[00:00.000 --> 00:27.500] Bad boys, what you gonna do? [00:27.500 --> 00:28.500] Bad boys, bad boys! [00:28.500 --> 00:29.500] What you gonna do? [00:29.500 --> 00:31.800] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [00:31.800 --> 00:33.500] Bad boys, bad boys [00:33.500 --> 00:34.900] Whatcha gonna do? [00:34.900 --> 00:37.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [00:37.500 --> 00:40.300] When you were eight and you had bad traits [00:40.300 --> 00:42.900] You go to school and learn the golden rule [00:42.900 --> 00:45.700] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [00:45.700 --> 00:48.300] If you get hot then you must get cool [00:48.300 --> 00:50.000] Bad boys, bad boys [00:50.000 --> 00:51.200] Whatcha gonna do? [00:51.200 --> 00:53.700] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [00:53.700 --> 00:55.400] Bad boys, bad boys [00:55.400 --> 00:56.700] Whatcha gonna do? [00:56.700 --> 00:59.400] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [00:59.400 --> 01:00.700] You chuck it on that one [01:00.700 --> 01:02.400] You chuck it on this one [01:02.400 --> 01:03.500] You chuck it on your mother [01:03.500 --> 01:04.900] And you chuck it on your father [01:04.900 --> 01:06.100] You chuck it on your brother [01:06.100 --> 01:07.700] And you chuck it on your sister [01:07.700 --> 01:08.900] You chuck it on that one [01:08.900 --> 01:10.200] And you chuck it on me [01:10.200 --> 01:11.900] Bad boys, bad boys [01:11.900 --> 01:13.200] Whatcha gonna do? [01:13.200 --> 01:15.600] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:15.600 --> 01:17.300] Bad boys, bad boys [01:17.300 --> 01:18.900] Whatcha gonna do? [01:18.900 --> 01:21.100] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:21.100 --> 01:22.900] Bad boys, bad boys [01:22.900 --> 01:24.200] Whatcha gonna do? [01:24.200 --> 01:26.700] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:26.700 --> 01:28.300] Bad boys, bad boys [01:28.300 --> 01:32.300] Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:32.300 --> 01:37.300] Nobody now give you no break. Police now give you no break. [01:37.300 --> 01:43.300] That old soldier man now give you no break. Not even your agent now give you no breaks. [01:43.300 --> 01:48.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:48.300 --> 01:54.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:54.300 --> 01:59.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [01:59.300 --> 02:06.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [02:25.300 --> 02:32.300] Why did you have to act so mean? Don't you know you're a human being? [02:32.300 --> 02:37.300] Born of a mother with a lover for father. Reflection comes and reflection goes. [02:37.300 --> 02:48.300] I know sometimes you wanna let go. Hey, hey, hey. I know sometimes you wanna let go. [02:48.300 --> 02:53.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [02:53.300 --> 02:58.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [02:58.300 --> 03:09.300] You're too bad. You're too rude. You're too bad. You're too rude, yeah. [03:09.300 --> 03:15.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:15.300 --> 03:20.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:20.300 --> 03:23.300] You chuck it on that one. You chuck it on this one. [03:23.300 --> 03:26.300] You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father. [03:26.300 --> 03:29.300] You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister. [03:29.300 --> 03:31.300] You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me. [03:31.300 --> 03:36.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:36.300 --> 03:42.300] Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:46.300 --> 03:52.300] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio. [03:52.300 --> 04:01.300] On this, the Thursday, the eighth day of May 2025, [04:01.300 --> 04:06.300] do you all realize we're approaching halfway through the year already? [04:08.300 --> 04:10.300] Mom warned me about this. [04:11.300 --> 04:23.300] But okay, so to start out with, I almost have my electronic lawyer up and working. [04:23.300 --> 04:28.300] I have finally set aside everything else. [04:28.300 --> 04:34.300] I've been working on this electronic lawyer for some 16 years now. [04:35.300 --> 04:39.300] I've got 16 years and over half a million dollars in it. [04:39.300 --> 04:45.300] And I've been spending my time on other things. [04:47.300 --> 04:53.300] Taking on the legal system, suing them and trying to get everything straightened out. [04:53.300 --> 05:01.300] And I finally decided that I have to get serious about this and get the electronic lawyer working. [05:02.300 --> 05:06.300] So I've been going through the questionnaires. [05:06.300 --> 05:13.300] If anybody is interested in helping me work out this system, make sure I got the bugs out of it, [05:13.300 --> 05:21.300] I would appreciate it if you send me a link to email to randyatruelaradio.com. [05:21.300 --> 05:27.300] I'll send you a link to the questionnaires and just go in there and fill them out. [05:27.300 --> 05:30.300] Just put any old stuff in there, who cares? [05:31.300 --> 05:38.300] And just follow the line of questions to the end and it will send me a report. [05:39.300 --> 05:46.300] And what I'm doing right now is I have to get a programmer to look at the software that I have. [05:46.300 --> 05:54.300] Because the software I have was written by some guys in Russia. [05:55.300 --> 06:03.300] In trying to find people to do programming for me, I learned some things. [06:03.300 --> 06:16.300] If you go to an Indian programmer, the Indian programming will give you exactly what you asked for, whether it works or not. [06:17.300 --> 06:26.300] If you go to an American programmer, you will not get what you asked for because he won't let you ask for anything. [06:27.300 --> 06:37.300] And I'm saying this after talking to a whole string of American programmers, one of whom was a listener to my show. [06:37.300 --> 06:44.300] And he contacted me and wanted to help me get this project up and off the ground. [06:46.300 --> 06:53.300] And he was a 20-year programmer. He had done 20 years of database programming. [06:54.300 --> 06:58.300] I told him precisely what I needed. [07:00.300 --> 07:07.300] And he said exactly what every other American programmer said. [07:07.300 --> 07:14.300] Oh, no, you don't need what you're asking for. You need what I want to give you. [07:17.300 --> 07:24.300] And he absolutely refused to give me what I asked for. [07:26.300 --> 07:31.300] I've probably had 20 American programmers that I've tried to work with. [07:32.300 --> 07:35.300] And every one of them did exactly the same thing. [07:36.300 --> 07:40.300] I couldn't even tell an American programmer what I needed. [07:41.300 --> 07:49.300] Because as soon as he thought he had the slightest idea of what I needed, oh, no, you don't need that. [07:49.300 --> 07:52.300] You need what I got to sell you. [07:52.300 --> 07:55.300] So I quit dealing with American programmers. [07:55.300 --> 08:00.300] The only ones I got good results from was Eastern Europe. [08:01.300 --> 08:07.300] Western Europe were a lot like Americans, but not quite as bad. [08:07.300 --> 08:13.300] Eastern Europe, I contacted a guy in Moscow. [08:14.300 --> 08:16.300] He was in Moscow originally. [08:16.300 --> 08:21.300] He wound up going to St. Petersburg and then immigrating to Australia. [08:21.300 --> 08:25.300] But first time I talked to him, I talked to him for about two hours. [08:27.300 --> 08:35.300] And then two weeks later, he came back and gave me better software than I asked for. [08:38.300 --> 08:39.300] Problem. [08:40.300 --> 08:48.300] Since the war between Russia and Kuwait, he disappeared. [08:49.300 --> 08:53.300] Even though he had immigrated to Australia, he disappeared. [08:53.300 --> 08:55.300] He had two programmers. [08:55.300 --> 08:59.300] One was originally in Moscow and then he went to St. Petersburg. [08:59.300 --> 09:03.300] And he had a friend in St. Petersburg and both of them disappeared. [09:03.300 --> 09:13.300] So now I have to find a programmer to take the programming they did and add a couple of pieces to it. [09:13.300 --> 09:16.300] I only need a couple of pieces added. [09:16.300 --> 09:25.300] And then I will have a tool that for criminal, someone with a criminal allegation against them, [09:26.300 --> 09:36.300] can go online and fill out this questionnaire and it will spit the amount and analysis of their case. [09:39.300 --> 09:45.300] Debra is trying to get bread in, so he'll probably be in by the next segment. [09:47.300 --> 09:49.300] But I'm going to turn, I can't turn the phone lines on. [09:49.300 --> 09:51.300] I don't have my wave station up yet. [09:51.300 --> 09:59.300] Debra, if you can hear me, if you can get up the wave station, turn on the call-in lines. [09:59.300 --> 10:04.300] So by the time we get to the next segment, we'll be ready to take some calls. [10:04.300 --> 10:06.300] I don't know if you can hear me or not. [10:07.300 --> 10:15.300] But we've had to migrate from Skype to Teams. [10:15.300 --> 10:18.300] And we don't have everything quite set up yet. [10:20.300 --> 10:22.300] Anyway, let me see what the time is. [10:22.300 --> 10:24.300] I am, okay, five minutes in. [10:26.300 --> 10:33.300] So I would like, if anyone is interested to help me beta test this questionnaire, [10:34.300 --> 10:41.300] send me an email at roelovellradio.com, randy at roelovellradio.com. [10:41.300 --> 10:43.300] And it doesn't matter if you have a case or not. [10:45.300 --> 10:47.300] Just fill in the blanks. [10:47.300 --> 10:48.300] Just answer the question. [10:48.300 --> 10:50.300] It doesn't matter if it's true or not. [10:50.300 --> 10:52.300] None of it makes any difference. [10:53.300 --> 11:00.300] Just fill out the questionnaire so that I get the system to actually produce some responses. [11:01.300 --> 11:07.300] The only response, only reports that I have on the system now are the ones I've done. [11:07.300 --> 11:13.300] So I need people to go in and use it and tell me what problems they have with it. [11:15.300 --> 11:17.300] The difficulty is I built it. [11:18.300 --> 11:23.300] So when I use it, I understand everything. [11:25.300 --> 11:27.300] I don't have any problems. [11:27.300 --> 11:36.300] And it's hard for me to step outside my mental perspective and into the mental perspective of someone who's never done anything. [11:36.300 --> 11:39.300] Like it's never had anything to do with this. [11:40.300 --> 11:51.300] So I'd appreciate it if anybody can, but we'll go to, no, just send an email to randy at roelovellradio.com. [11:51.300 --> 11:57.300] And let me know, and I will send you a link to the questionnaire and fill it out. [11:57.300 --> 11:59.300] And let's get this thing up and working. [12:00.300 --> 12:10.300] This is the electronic lawyer that I've been working on for the last 17 years, 16, 17 years. [12:11.300 --> 12:13.300] It's been so long, I forget. [12:14.300 --> 12:16.300] I've got over half a million dollars in it. [12:17.300 --> 12:21.300] All of my fortune is in this project. [12:22.300 --> 12:24.300] Right now I'm retired. [12:24.300 --> 12:28.300] I have no retirement income other than Social Security. [12:30.300 --> 12:35.300] I put everything else into this project, but I'm at the point of getting it lost. [12:35.300 --> 12:40.300] And it's a great time to do that with the changes Trump is making. [12:41.300 --> 12:50.300] This is a real good time to get this thing going and bring the legal system back within the rule of law. [12:50.300 --> 13:03.300] This is a real good time to get this thing going and bring the legal system back within the rule of law. [13:04.300 --> 13:13.300] They have gotten so far outside the rule of law that it's not even close. [13:14.300 --> 13:16.300] I live in Texas. [13:17.300 --> 13:28.300] And in Texas, the average conviction rate for all crimes across the board is 99.6. [13:30.300 --> 13:32.300] That's insane. [13:33.300 --> 13:38.300] I'm hoping you and I, we can do something to kind of fix that. [13:38.300 --> 13:41.300] Randy Cowell and Brett Fountain do a little radio. [13:41.300 --> 13:44.300] I can't see the clock, so I may go out too early. [13:44.300 --> 13:46.300] We'll be right back. [13:59.300 --> 14:05.300] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [14:05.300 --> 14:08.300] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [14:08.300 --> 14:10.300] And it's time we changed all that. [14:10.300 --> 14:16.300] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [14:16.300 --> 14:24.300] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [14:24.300 --> 14:30.300] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [14:30.300 --> 14:38.300] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [14:38.300 --> 14:45.300] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [14:45.300 --> 14:50.300] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [14:50.300 --> 14:57.300] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [14:57.300 --> 14:59.300] Order now. [14:59.300 --> 15:04.300] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [15:04.300 --> 15:10.300] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk, [15:10.300 --> 15:15.300] where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [15:15.300 --> 15:22.300] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [15:22.300 --> 15:30.300] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [15:30.300 --> 15:37.300] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [15:37.300 --> 15:42.300] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [15:42.300 --> 15:48.300] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [15:48.300 --> 15:58.300] So tune in to scripture talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures. [16:00.300 --> 16:08.300] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com [16:30.300 --> 16:40.300] We ask the question, look what we get, and they don't ever answer. [16:40.300 --> 16:42.300] I'm sloping, slipping, sliding. [16:42.300 --> 16:47.300] Them a talk about issues per se, Lord, how they want we to take it easy. [16:47.300 --> 16:52.300] Them a talk way too politically and them getting mad and angry. [16:52.300 --> 16:57.300] But them not standing up and fighting, fight for the freedom and be free. [16:57.300 --> 17:02.300] And they like them love slavery and get handouts from the government. [17:02.300 --> 17:13.300] We ask the question, look what we get, and they don't ever answer. [17:13.300 --> 17:22.300] We ask the question, look what we get, and they don't ever answer. [17:22.300 --> 17:34.300] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Colton, Brett Fountainwood Law Radio. [17:34.300 --> 17:36.300] And we're trying to get Brett up. [17:36.300 --> 17:39.300] We're migrating from Skype to Teams. [17:39.300 --> 17:44.300] So Brett should be coming in shortly. [17:45.300 --> 17:54.300] I've been working on my electronic lawyer, and I'm hoping I can get a lot of you to participate. [17:54.300 --> 18:01.300] This has been a, what about, an 18-year odyssey for me. [18:01.300 --> 18:11.300] Years, a long time ago, someone called into the show and asked me if I knew what a Frank's hearing was. [18:11.300 --> 18:14.300] Oh, by the way, call boards are open. [18:14.300 --> 18:17.300] If you have a question or comment, give us a call. [18:17.300 --> 18:25.300] I will just wander around and blab about all kind of stuff until I get some callers. [18:25.300 --> 18:30.300] But now I even lost where I was at. [18:30.300 --> 18:41.300] Okay, a long time ago, I had someone call into the show and ask me if I knew what a Frank's hearing was. [18:41.300 --> 18:49.300] And I told them, yeah, I heard of it, but I don't remember what it is. [18:49.300 --> 18:55.300] So after the show, I went on the Internet and looked it up. [18:56.300 --> 19:08.300] Frank's hearing is a hearing for the purpose of determining the veracity of a police officer who testified before a magistrate to secure a warrant. [19:08.300 --> 19:12.300] And I thought that was interesting. [19:12.300 --> 19:16.300] It is kind of an obscure issue. [19:16.300 --> 19:27.300] So how do I put together something so that I will never miss that particular issue? [19:27.300 --> 19:33.300] And this was not long after I read an article in the Scientific American. [19:33.300 --> 19:41.300] And it was about a doctor who had diagnosed a very obscure disease. [19:41.300 --> 19:45.300] And in the article, he explained how he did it. [19:45.300 --> 19:55.300] He had been to a convention of people who worked in his particular area of expertise. [19:55.300 --> 20:03.300] And he went to his obligated meetings, and he was kind of done, and he's wandering around the pavilion. [20:03.300 --> 20:09.300] And he come across this presentation on this obscure African disease. [20:09.300 --> 20:14.300] So he was bored, so he went and sat down and listened to the presentation. [20:14.300 --> 20:22.300] Six weeks later, he had a patient with that disease. [20:22.300 --> 20:31.300] And he got all this notoriety because he was able to diagnose that disease. [20:31.300 --> 20:34.300] I said, what? [20:34.300 --> 20:40.300] That's the only reason I can get diagnosed is serendipity? [20:40.300 --> 20:46.300] Then if I happen to have a doctor who happened to be in the right place at exactly the right time [20:46.300 --> 20:51.300] and heard exactly the right presentation, he can diagnose my disease? [20:51.300 --> 20:54.300] The heck is this crap? [20:54.300 --> 20:57.300] We need a way to fix that. [20:57.300 --> 21:11.300] And between the two, that kind of set me on a odyssey of figuring out how to capture the knowledge base of the human animal [21:11.300 --> 21:19.300] in a way that we could make it available to the ordinary layperson. [21:19.300 --> 21:24.300] And after 16 years, I got something. [21:24.300 --> 21:35.300] In this particular application, I'm calling it the electronicparalegal.com or electronic lawyer. [21:35.300 --> 21:47.300] But the underlying software, the underlying methodology will allow us to capture the entire knowledge base of the human animal. [21:47.300 --> 21:51.300] This is not AI. [21:51.300 --> 21:57.300] This is OI, organic intelligence. [21:57.300 --> 22:02.300] This is not some tool that figures stuff out. [22:02.300 --> 22:12.300] It is a tool for capturing the knowledge base of a professional in a given position, a given professional. [22:12.300 --> 22:23.300] Well, I've used this tool to capture the knowledge base for criminal law. [22:23.300 --> 22:37.300] If you have been accused of a crime, you go to this questionnaire and it has, for the most part, my knowledge base. [22:37.300 --> 22:48.300] I've been able to take what I know about criminal law and criminal procedure and put it inside this tool. [22:48.300 --> 22:51.300] And granted, I don't know everything. [22:51.300 --> 22:55.300] Yeah, there may be a lot of stuff I don't know. [22:55.300 --> 23:06.300] But what I do know is in this tool and it is fixed inside this tool, absolutely consistent. [23:06.300 --> 23:17.300] So now what I can do is I can take someone with more knowledge than me and have them follow my line of questions. [23:17.300 --> 23:21.300] Let me give you an example. [23:21.300 --> 23:24.300] Let's see, traffic. [23:24.300 --> 23:34.300] Let's see, at the time of the stop, was the vehicle you were in being operated on a public roadway? [23:34.300 --> 23:42.300] If they answer yes, then I ask, at the time of the stop, were you the operator of the motor vehicle? [23:42.300 --> 23:47.300] Now, think about this. You're someone who doesn't know anything about what happened. [23:47.300 --> 23:53.300] Person has a legal issue. And in this case, it happens to be traffic. [23:53.300 --> 23:57.300] It started out, when I opened my program, it started out with traffic. [23:57.300 --> 24:01.300] So a guy has a traffic issue. You don't know anything about it. [24:02.300 --> 24:05.300] How do you isolate this particular issue? [24:05.300 --> 24:12.300] OK, first issue was the vehicle being operated on a public roadway. [24:12.300 --> 24:18.300] That is the first issue before you can get to anything else. [24:18.300 --> 24:23.300] At this time of the stop, if they say yes, it was operated on a public roadway, [24:23.300 --> 24:31.300] then the transportation code may apply. [24:31.300 --> 24:36.300] At the time of the stop, were you the operator of the vehicle? [24:36.300 --> 24:50.300] OK, they say yes. And the way I create these is I start asking questions and assume that the respondent always answers yes. [24:51.300 --> 24:54.300] So everything I ask, they're going to answer yes to. [24:54.300 --> 24:57.300] So at the time of the stop, were you the operator of the vehicle? [24:57.300 --> 25:05.300] And they say yes. Did the officer inform you that you were being detained? [25:05.300 --> 25:15.300] Yeah. OK, did you ask the officer why you were being detained? Yes. [25:16.300 --> 25:24.300] Did the officer claim that she or he had a reason to believe you had committed a crime? Yes. [25:24.300 --> 25:27.300] Did the officer demand that you produce identification? [25:27.300 --> 25:32.300] Those of you who's listened to the show, you may recognize where I'm going. [25:32.300 --> 25:42.300] If you have been stopped by a peace officer and the peace officer has reason to believe that you've committed a crime, [25:42.300 --> 25:53.300] reasonable, articulatable belief, then did the officer demand that you produce identification? [25:53.300 --> 26:02.300] If the officer has stopped you and he has a reasonable cause to believe that you've committed a crime, then he has standing to demand identification. [26:02.300 --> 26:09.300] So yes, did you object to being required to identify yourself? Yes. [26:09.300 --> 26:14.300] And my questionnaire here says go to fail to identify. [26:14.300 --> 26:19.300] I'm actually giving up how I produce this thing. [26:19.300 --> 26:25.300] There can be yeses and nos and yeses. I think I just got on. [26:25.300 --> 26:30.300] Who's that? That's some guy I've heard his voice before. [26:30.300 --> 26:33.300] Hello, Mr. Brett. [26:33.300 --> 26:36.300] Okay. [26:36.300 --> 26:39.300] Okay, it sounds like we are going to our... [26:39.300 --> 26:43.300] They got here just in time to do the outro. [26:43.300 --> 26:46.300] You want to do the outro, Brett? [26:49.300 --> 26:50.300] He's not doing the outro. [26:50.300 --> 26:53.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountainwood of La Radio. [26:53.300 --> 26:55.300] We'll be right back. [26:56.300 --> 27:04.300] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. [27:04.300 --> 27:09.300] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets. [27:09.300 --> 27:13.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details. [27:13.300 --> 27:19.300] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [27:19.300 --> 27:24.300] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [27:24.300 --> 27:29.300] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [27:29.300 --> 27:32.300] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [27:32.300 --> 27:35.300] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [27:35.300 --> 27:39.300] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [27:39.300 --> 27:43.300] Start over with StartPage. [27:43.300 --> 27:50.300] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information. [27:50.300 --> 27:52.300] But what happens if it escapes their control? [27:52.300 --> 27:55.300] It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey, [27:55.300 --> 28:02.300] a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year. [28:02.300 --> 28:06.300] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [28:06.300 --> 28:10.300] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [28:10.300 --> 28:14.300] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. [28:14.300 --> 28:16.300] The cupboard would be bare. [28:16.300 --> 28:19.300] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [28:19.300 --> 28:24.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [28:49.300 --> 28:51.300] And believe there is more to the story. [28:51.300 --> 28:54.300] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [28:54.300 --> 28:56.300] Go to buildingwhat.org. [28:56.300 --> 29:00.300] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [29:00.300 --> 29:04.300] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [29:04.300 --> 29:06.300] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [29:06.300 --> 29:08.300] and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, [29:08.300 --> 29:11.300] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [29:11.300 --> 29:14.300] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [29:14.300 --> 29:18.300] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [29:18.300 --> 29:21.300] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [29:21.300 --> 29:24.300] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [29:24.300 --> 29:27.300] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [29:27.300 --> 29:30.300] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [29:30.300 --> 29:32.300] that will help you understand what due process is [29:32.300 --> 29:34.300] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [29:34.300 --> 29:36.300] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [29:36.300 --> 29:39.300] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [29:39.300 --> 29:41.300] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [29:41.300 --> 29:44.300] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [29:44.300 --> 29:46.300] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [29:46.300 --> 29:49.300] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [29:49.300 --> 29:53.300] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [29:53.300 --> 29:58.300] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [30:17.300 --> 30:21.300] I want you to follow the law of the land [30:21.300 --> 30:24.300] I don't understand [30:24.300 --> 30:27.300] Your job is to protect and to serve [30:27.300 --> 30:30.300] Not beat and abuse [30:30.300 --> 30:33.300] Not be served [30:33.300 --> 30:36.300] When you gonna stop abuse [30:36.300 --> 30:39.300] Your power [30:39.300 --> 30:42.300] When you gonna stop abuse [30:42.300 --> 30:45.300] Your power [30:45.300 --> 30:48.300] When you gonna stop abuse [30:48.300 --> 30:51.300] Your power [30:51.300 --> 30:54.300] When you gonna stop abuse [30:54.300 --> 30:57.300] Your power [30:57.300 --> 31:02.300] So please Mr. Macklin, teach officers not to abuse their power [31:02.300 --> 31:07.300] Send a request to the leader, the captain of all officers [31:07.300 --> 31:10.300] Tell them to uphold the law [31:10.300 --> 31:13.300] And please don't abuse their power [31:13.300 --> 31:17.300] And the chief and the chief and the lie every hour [31:17.300 --> 31:20.300] So Mr. Officer [31:20.300 --> 31:23.300] Please stop abusing your power [31:23.300 --> 31:25.300] You pull me over [31:25.300 --> 31:28.300] And tell me to be silent, sir [31:28.300 --> 31:31.300] I need to speak to my lawyer [31:43.300 --> 31:46.300] We're up to the 8th already [31:46.300 --> 31:49.300] Almost half way through the year [31:49.300 --> 31:52.300] That's scary [31:52.300 --> 31:55.300] Do you know which year? [31:55.300 --> 31:58.300] Yeah, I know which year [31:58.300 --> 32:01.300] 2020 [32:01.300 --> 32:04.300] Mile [32:04.300 --> 32:07.300] 25, okay [32:08.300 --> 32:11.300] Okay, I was talking about [32:11.300 --> 32:14.300] My program that I'm [32:14.300 --> 32:17.300] I'm getting really close to launching it [32:17.300 --> 32:20.300] And for everybody out there [32:20.300 --> 32:23.300] You have legal issues [32:23.300 --> 32:26.300] Once I get this thing loaded up [32:26.300 --> 32:29.300] I'm gonna want everybody's legal issues [32:29.300 --> 32:32.300] So that I could take their issues [32:32.300 --> 32:35.300] And build documents [32:35.300 --> 32:38.300] That address their issues [32:38.300 --> 32:41.300] Lawyers [32:41.300 --> 32:44.300] They get in the legal field [32:44.300 --> 32:47.300] They look at all of these laws and all of these potential [32:47.300 --> 32:50.300] Situations and circumstances and they think [32:50.300 --> 32:53.300] That the law is horribly, horribly complex [32:53.300 --> 32:56.300] On one of my websites I had this [32:56.300 --> 32:59.300] Image, this picture of a [32:59.300 --> 33:02.300] Legal library in Ohio [33:02.300 --> 33:05.300] It was six stories high [33:05.300 --> 33:08.300] It had this huge foyer in the middle [33:08.300 --> 33:11.300] It went all the way up six stories [33:11.300 --> 33:14.300] And on each side there were [33:14.300 --> 33:17.300] Areas with lines of books on them [33:17.300 --> 33:20.300] Six stories high [33:20.300 --> 33:23.300] So you're looking at this legal library [33:23.300 --> 33:26.300] That had to be 100 feet long [33:26.300 --> 33:29.300] 150 [33:29.300 --> 33:32.300] Six stories high [33:32.300 --> 33:35.300] Legal books [33:35.300 --> 33:38.300] That was horribly intimidating [33:38.300 --> 33:41.300] It's kind of like [33:41.300 --> 33:44.300] When you have a legal issue [33:44.300 --> 33:47.300] And you look in your mind for all the legal ramifications [33:47.300 --> 33:50.300] It's like [33:50.300 --> 33:53.300] You're looking into this [33:53.300 --> 33:56.300] Bottomless pit [33:56.300 --> 33:59.300] With infinite possibilities [33:59.300 --> 34:02.300] Well [34:02.300 --> 34:05.300] One thing that designing this software [34:05.300 --> 34:08.300] Demonstrated to me [34:08.300 --> 34:11.300] That it's not a bottomless pit [34:11.300 --> 34:14.300] And there are not [34:14.300 --> 34:17.300] Endless possibilities [34:17.300 --> 34:20.300] The only thing that's problematic [34:20.300 --> 34:23.300] Is organization [34:23.300 --> 34:26.300] If we take all the law [34:26.300 --> 34:29.300] And get it organized [34:29.300 --> 34:32.300] It's not so complicated at all [34:32.300 --> 34:35.300] Okay, well it is somewhat complicated [34:35.300 --> 34:38.300] But it is [34:38.300 --> 34:41.300] Straightforward [34:41.300 --> 34:44.300] Do this step, do this step, do this step [34:44.300 --> 34:47.300] The only time you have a problem [34:47.300 --> 34:50.300] Is when you miss a step [34:50.300 --> 34:53.300] Each step [34:53.300 --> 34:56.300] There is all kinds of case law and such [34:56.300 --> 34:59.300] But as long as you keep all the steps in place [34:59.300 --> 35:02.300] It dramatically [35:02.300 --> 35:05.300] Reduces the amount of complexity [35:05.300 --> 35:08.300] And that's what [35:08.300 --> 35:11.300] Electronic lawyer project is designed to do [35:11.300 --> 35:14.300] So [35:14.300 --> 35:17.300] What I need to hear [35:17.300 --> 35:20.300] Is your issues [35:20.300 --> 35:23.300] I got my issues [35:23.300 --> 35:26.300] I've been arrested, I've been beat up [35:26.300 --> 35:29.300] Had bones broken, I got all this experience [35:29.300 --> 35:32.300] And I have collected all of this [35:32.300 --> 35:35.300] Experience [35:35.300 --> 35:38.300] Into a million and a half questions [35:38.300 --> 35:41.300] In a questionnaire [35:41.300 --> 35:44.300] Million and a half at the last count [35:44.300 --> 35:47.300] In a questionnaire [35:47.300 --> 35:50.300] Run the system and tell me you had that many questions [35:50.300 --> 35:53.300] But I think that's deceptive [35:53.300 --> 35:56.300] I think that's deceptive [35:56.300 --> 35:59.300] Because [35:59.300 --> 36:02.300] In each criminal issue [36:02.300 --> 36:05.300] You have a set of elements [36:05.300 --> 36:08.300] I did DUI [36:08.300 --> 36:11.300] DUI had nine issues [36:11.300 --> 36:14.300] Once I worked through DUI [36:14.300 --> 36:17.300] And then went back and looked at it, it only had nine issues [36:17.300 --> 36:20.300] Now the questionnaire was huge [36:20.300 --> 36:23.300] But it was [36:23.300 --> 36:26.300] Made up of these nine issues [36:26.300 --> 36:29.300] Spread around [36:29.300 --> 36:32.300] In different contexts [36:32.300 --> 36:35.300] And in different orders [36:35.300 --> 36:38.300] But once I started [36:38.300 --> 36:41.300] Organizing all the issues [36:41.300 --> 36:44.300] There were only nine [36:44.300 --> 36:47.300] And I could put all those nine over on one side [36:47.300 --> 36:50.300] Ask you a question and say, okay, that points to this issue [36:50.300 --> 36:53.300] Go to that issue, ask the questions [36:53.300 --> 36:56.300] And then come back and ask you another one [36:56.300 --> 36:59.300] That points to this other issue [36:59.300 --> 37:02.300] I may go to those issues in [37:02.300 --> 37:05.300] An infinite number of [37:05.300 --> 37:08.300] But at the end of the day [37:08.300 --> 37:11.300] There were only nine issues [37:11.300 --> 37:14.300] I don't think lawyers get this [37:14.300 --> 37:17.300] They think law is [37:17.300 --> 37:20.300] Way, way more complex than that [37:20.300 --> 37:23.300] So [37:23.300 --> 37:26.300] This is what building the tool has taught me [37:26.300 --> 37:29.300] Now what I want to do [37:29.300 --> 37:32.300] Is expand on my own [37:32.300 --> 37:35.300] Personal knowledge base [37:35.300 --> 37:38.300] I need your knowledge base [37:38.300 --> 37:41.300] And calling into the show [37:41.300 --> 37:44.300] And telling me that [37:44.300 --> 37:47.300] Your knowledge base, I've got a whole lot of experience in that [37:47.300 --> 37:50.300] And that is enough to tell me [37:50.300 --> 37:53.300] That there's an infinite [37:53.300 --> 37:56.300] Number of possibilities [37:56.300 --> 37:59.300] That can bring us to a particular [37:59.300 --> 38:02.300] Data set [38:02.300 --> 38:05.300] But once we get to that data set [38:05.300 --> 38:08.300] Which this data set is [38:08.300 --> 38:11.300] Criminal law [38:11.300 --> 38:14.300] The criminal law data set [38:14.300 --> 38:17.300] Is very finite [38:17.300 --> 38:20.300] Nothing vague or ambiguous [38:20.300 --> 38:23.300] About criminal law [38:23.300 --> 38:26.300] It is specific [38:26.300 --> 38:29.300] And straightforward [38:29.300 --> 38:32.300] They're vague and [38:32.300 --> 38:35.300] Inspecific assertions and allegations [38:35.300 --> 38:38.300] And facts and presumed facts [38:38.300 --> 38:41.300] They lead us to a set of [38:41.300 --> 38:44.300] Possibilities in law [38:44.300 --> 38:47.300] That are very specific [38:47.300 --> 38:50.300] So it turns out it's not that hard [38:50.300 --> 38:53.300] By asking some [38:53.300 --> 38:56.300] Pointed questions to lead us [38:56.300 --> 38:59.300] To the specific legal issues [38:59.300 --> 39:02.300] Brett, am I making sense? [39:02.300 --> 39:05.300] Yep, sure [39:05.300 --> 39:08.300] What I'm trying to tell everybody is not as complicated [39:08.300 --> 39:11.300] As you think it is [39:11.300 --> 39:14.300] Yeah, there are an infinite number of ways [39:14.300 --> 39:17.300] You can get to a certain point [39:17.300 --> 39:20.300] But once you get to that point, it makes no difference [39:20.300 --> 39:23.300] The law is always the same [39:23.300 --> 39:26.300] In what order [39:26.300 --> 39:29.300] Rest without warrant [39:29.300 --> 39:32.300] There's a whole myriad [39:32.300 --> 39:35.300] Of different methods [39:35.300 --> 39:38.300] Ways that you can get to arrest without a warrant [39:38.300 --> 39:41.300] But once you get to arrest without a warrant [39:41.300 --> 39:44.300] The law is absolutely specific [39:44.300 --> 39:47.300] On what must happen [39:47.300 --> 39:50.300] The law is always the same [39:50.300 --> 39:53.300] Lawyers tend to not get this part [39:53.300 --> 39:56.300] Because they're not engineers [39:56.300 --> 39:59.300] They mix up the facts [39:59.300 --> 40:02.300] With the law [40:02.300 --> 40:05.300] And their conclusions [40:05.300 --> 40:08.300] Yeah, and their conclusions about the facts and the law [40:08.300 --> 40:11.300] Well, if you want to build your knowledge base [40:11.300 --> 40:14.300] By having callers dump in their knowledge [40:14.300 --> 40:17.300] Give out the caller number [40:17.300 --> 40:20.300] I don't know why I hadn't thought of that [40:20.300 --> 40:23.300] Caller number [40:23.300 --> 40:26.300] Caller page is on [40:26.300 --> 40:29.300] If you have a question or comment, give us a call [40:29.300 --> 40:32.300] And I'm kind of focused on [40:32.300 --> 40:35.300] What I'm doing right now [40:35.300 --> 40:38.300] Is finishing up almost 20 years [40:38.300 --> 40:41.300] Of research [40:41.300 --> 40:44.300] I'm kind of focused on getting you guys' inputs [40:44.300 --> 40:47.300] On the different ways you get to the legal issues [40:47.300 --> 40:50.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio [40:50.300 --> 40:53.300] Call in number [40:53.300 --> 40:56.300] 512-646-1984 [40:56.300 --> 40:59.300] We'll be right back [41:11.300 --> 41:14.300] To save in premium costs [41:14.300 --> 41:17.300] On a current major medical plan [41:17.300 --> 41:20.300] By lowering the claims cost [41:20.300 --> 41:23.300] The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved [41:23.300 --> 41:26.300] Preventative health plan [41:26.300 --> 41:29.300] That provides your employees with doctors, medications [41:29.300 --> 41:32.300] Emergency care and Teladoc [41:32.300 --> 41:35.300] All at zero cost with zero copay [41:35.300 --> 41:38.300] If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise [41:38.300 --> 41:41.300] As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars [41:41.300 --> 41:44.300] And matching FICA taxes [41:44.300 --> 41:47.300] The CHAMP plan can help add working capital [41:47.300 --> 41:50.300] Market resale value or pay down lines of credit [41:50.300 --> 41:53.300] Call Scott at 214-730-2471 [41:53.300 --> 41:56.300] Or dallasmms.com [41:59.300 --> 42:02.300] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [42:02.300 --> 42:05.300] Win your case without an attorney [42:05.300 --> 42:08.300] Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand [42:08.300 --> 42:11.300] 4-CD course that will show you how [42:11.300 --> 42:14.300] In 24 hours, step by step [42:14.300 --> 42:17.300] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing [42:17.300 --> 42:20.300] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself [42:20.300 --> 42:23.300] Thousands have won with our step by step course [42:23.300 --> 42:26.300] And now you can too [42:26.300 --> 42:29.300] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [42:29.300 --> 42:32.300] With 22 years of case winning experience [42:32.300 --> 42:35.300] Even if you're not in a lawsuit [42:35.300 --> 42:38.300] You can learn what everyone should understand [42:38.300 --> 42:41.300] About the principles and practices that control our American courts [42:41.300 --> 42:44.300] You'll receive our audio classroom [42:44.300 --> 42:47.300] Video seminar, tutorials [42:47.300 --> 42:50.300] Forms for civil cases, pro se tactics [42:50.300 --> 42:53.300] And much more [42:53.300 --> 42:56.300] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [42:56.300 --> 42:59.300] Or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ [43:02.300 --> 43:05.300] Music [43:05.300 --> 43:08.300] Music [43:08.300 --> 43:11.300] Music [43:11.300 --> 43:14.300] Music [43:14.300 --> 43:17.300] Music [43:17.300 --> 43:20.300] Music [43:20.300 --> 43:23.300] Music [43:23.300 --> 43:26.300] Music [43:26.300 --> 43:29.300] Music [43:29.300 --> 43:32.300] Music [43:32.300 --> 43:35.300] Music [43:35.300 --> 43:38.300] Music [43:38.300 --> 43:41.300] Music [43:41.300 --> 43:44.300] Music [43:44.300 --> 43:47.300] Music [43:47.300 --> 43:50.300] Music [43:50.300 --> 43:53.300] Music [43:53.300 --> 43:56.300] Music [43:56.300 --> 44:06.300] Reflection isn't addiction, the hard work can leave you topless nails [44:06.300 --> 44:12.300] There's been hostility towards tranquility, heavy loads of taping on scales [44:12.300 --> 44:18.300] The time is colliding with the conflict, you find out after a while [44:18.300 --> 44:23.300] It's not your moral standard, it's your patience that's on trial [44:23.300 --> 44:46.300] Watching the sparks fly [44:53.300 --> 45:08.620] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, and Debra is doing a little [45:08.620 --> 45:12.420] maintenance on the color lines, so they're not quite up yet, but they will be shortly. [45:12.420 --> 45:17.940] We'll let you know as soon as they are. Brett, on the break, we were talking about an issue [45:17.940 --> 45:27.300] you have with the IRS. But before we get there, there may be a problem, because as I understand [45:27.300 --> 45:34.500] yesterday, 10,000 IRS agents up and resigned. [45:34.500 --> 45:37.380] Why would they do a thing like that? [45:37.460 --> 45:43.220] I think they thought President Trump didn't appreciate them enough. [45:47.380 --> 45:52.740] Well, yeah, I was wondering if you wanted to talk about the federal tax court. [45:53.380 --> 45:54.740] Yes, I absolutely do. [45:56.020 --> 46:01.220] So they have their own court. It's an administrative court that deals specifically with [46:01.940 --> 46:11.460] IRS as one party and you as the other. So it's similar in a lot of ways to the [46:12.100 --> 46:19.300] Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, FRCP, but it's slightly different. They have things tweaked a [46:19.300 --> 46:25.700] little bit with their, all the rule numbers are different, and discovery is slightly different, [46:25.700 --> 46:30.340] and you just have to read up on the rules. There's a little bit difference on minor [46:30.340 --> 46:35.300] details of deadlines and things, but it's basically the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [46:35.300 --> 46:45.140] tweaked for tax court. And I took them to tax court because I read a book from Dan Pilla. [46:46.020 --> 46:54.660] Dan Pilla died in the wool. He's going to do everything as if we are liable for all taxes, [46:54.660 --> 47:00.660] as if all human beings are automatically taxpayers. He starts from that presumption. [47:01.300 --> 47:05.220] He knows the code very well, but he never addresses the fact of who's liable, [47:06.580 --> 47:14.260] who is a taxpayer. He never goes there. He starts from the presumption that [47:16.900 --> 47:24.180] if they want you to owe it, then magically you owe it. And then from that point, he is very [47:24.260 --> 47:31.540] didactic and carefully walks you through all of how to navigate their system. [47:32.260 --> 47:33.140] Didactic? [47:35.540 --> 47:37.220] You could ask Tina about that one. [47:42.100 --> 47:47.540] So Dan Pilla is very good with the details. He brings out details to help you. [47:48.500 --> 47:56.500] Like you say, pedantic. He steps through the little details so that you don't miss anything. [47:56.500 --> 47:59.780] He's doing with tax law what we do with criminal law. [48:01.540 --> 48:07.700] Yes, and he does it in a way that Dr. Graves would address, criminal law. [48:09.140 --> 48:15.860] In other words, you and I start from the position of a willingness to challenge jurisdiction. [48:17.780 --> 48:22.260] Most attorneys won't do that. Dan Pilla doesn't do that with the tax law. [48:22.980 --> 48:31.940] Dan Pilla starts from the position of bowing and groveling and doing everything according [48:31.940 --> 48:36.020] to the book. So he's very good with presenting how to navigate the system. [48:38.340 --> 48:45.780] But one thing that he did bring out in one of his books was really encouraging to me. [48:46.740 --> 48:54.980] He said, believe it or not, the United States tax court fines frequently in favor of the taxpayer. [48:55.940 --> 49:04.580] So in fact, more than half of the time, the IRS commissioner is the party on the other side, [49:04.580 --> 49:08.420] always. And he says more than half of the time, the commissioner loses [49:09.140 --> 49:13.140] in tax court to the taxpayer. It was frequently a pro se. [49:16.580 --> 49:18.100] So that's interesting. [49:18.100 --> 49:22.900] Yeah, very different twist than what we see in the rest of the courts, right? [49:25.140 --> 49:30.420] So that encouraged me to go ahead and try it. So I took the commissioner to tax court. [49:31.380 --> 49:41.140] And that was in February. They have 60 days to answer, not 21 like in the usual civil matters, [49:41.140 --> 49:56.900] but 60. Well, guess what? On day 59, a pile of lawyers put together this bundle of garbage and [49:56.900 --> 50:06.580] dumped it into the record as titled as an answer. And they started out, they let out and set up the [50:06.580 --> 50:12.740] context of their answer without the benefit of the administrative records. [50:16.260 --> 50:18.740] So they're essentially saying, what does that mean? [50:19.300 --> 50:21.780] It means they don't have any documents to look at. [50:23.940 --> 50:30.100] Okay, that's a way of saying we are pulling this out of our behind. [50:30.820 --> 50:42.100] Mm hmm. Yep, exactly. So they went through the effort to give an answer, [50:43.140 --> 50:46.900] but there was five lawyers that signed their names to this thing. [50:48.740 --> 50:57.860] And in a lot of the assertions that I made in my primary pleadings, their answer [50:57.860 --> 51:04.980] responded with, they have a lack of knowledge sufficient to respond, [51:05.620 --> 51:08.020] lack of knowledge sufficient, lack of knowledge sufficient. [51:08.020 --> 51:14.740] So that account amounts to a failure to dispute the issue. [51:16.100 --> 51:23.540] Exactly. And it also is specifically contrary or explicitly contrary to the tax court rules. [51:24.180 --> 51:29.220] They're not allowed to do a general denial. You know how in the civil court rules, [51:29.220 --> 51:35.540] you can just generally deny everything. You don't have to specifically one by one. [51:35.540 --> 51:37.540] Let me speak to that. Sure. [51:37.540 --> 51:46.660] You can do a general denial, but if someone in their pleading has made a specific accusation, [51:47.620 --> 51:51.700] you cannot do a general denial to a specific accusation. [51:52.660 --> 52:00.900] You have to address the specifics of the plaintiff's pleading specifically. [52:04.420 --> 52:05.700] Does that make sense? [52:05.700 --> 52:12.740] Yeah. Well, in the tax court, they don't get to do any general denials, and that's all they did. [52:12.740 --> 52:20.740] Yes. And in all of this about lack of information sufficient or lack of knowledge, [52:23.540 --> 52:32.100] I highlighted for the tax court that they are playing this improper shell game and trying to [52:34.180 --> 52:40.340] conflate the commissioner's lack of knowledge with their own. [52:40.740 --> 52:44.260] Because, of course, they're a pile of attorneys, and they don't have any personal knowledge of [52:44.260 --> 52:49.540] anything. But who cares? It's the commissioner whose knowledge is at question here, not theirs. [52:51.140 --> 52:55.860] And the commissioner is the one who has those records. Or does he? If he doesn't have those [52:55.860 --> 52:59.700] records, then he has no way to prevail. So you might as well just go ahead and give up now. [53:04.500 --> 53:04.660] Please. [53:04.660 --> 53:05.940] So we'll see what happens. [53:05.940 --> 53:08.340] I don't understand the context of that. [53:08.340 --> 53:17.620] The context of administrative records. If the commissioner is asserting [53:18.420 --> 53:25.140] that there's a notice of deficiency, well, presumably he's got some math to back that up [53:25.140 --> 53:34.420] and say why there's a deficiency. And there's got to be some kind of indication of who's a taxpayer [53:34.420 --> 53:41.300] and how they came up with the idea to come after me. And they should have records of [53:41.300 --> 53:47.540] all the money that they did take because if I had filed one of their precious 1040 forms that I'm [53:47.540 --> 53:54.580] by law not even allowed to file. But if I had, and I had sworn under penalty of perjury [53:55.460 --> 53:59.940] that I owe them all this money, then they would have given me a quote refund. [53:59.940 --> 54:08.180] So where are all of their records that support this idea? All the stack of assumptions. [54:09.380 --> 54:11.940] I owe money and that I didn't pay enough, all that stuff. [54:12.660 --> 54:13.780] That begs a question. [54:14.660 --> 54:16.020] Begs a lot of them. [54:16.020 --> 54:17.540] Yeah. Who says you owed money? [54:18.740 --> 54:20.580] Exactly. That's the commissioner. [54:21.380 --> 54:27.780] And did they just make this up and decide that you owed money by snatching nothing out of the air? [54:28.580 --> 54:32.340] Yeah. And that's what I mean by saying if there are no records, then [54:32.980 --> 54:35.380] the commissioner has no way to prevail in this case. [54:36.020 --> 54:42.420] If worse than that, the commissioner has tampered with the government document. [54:46.340 --> 54:49.700] Has exerted or purported to exert an authority he doesn't have. [54:50.980 --> 54:55.380] He doesn't have authority to come after you unless he has reason to believe. [54:55.620 --> 55:03.620] And based on articulatable facts that you have violated the tax code, did he demonstrate any of [55:03.620 --> 55:09.780] that? No. In fact, we have five attorneys swearing on their oath that the commissioner has no [55:09.780 --> 55:13.300] knowledge about any of this and has no benefit of the administrative records. [55:16.820 --> 55:20.500] So they're just throwing crap out there to see who salutes. [55:20.500 --> 55:23.540] Somebody should stick their boot up their behinds for that. [55:23.940 --> 55:26.980] Yeah. So that's what I did. I filed a motion to strike their answer. [55:31.220 --> 55:35.220] Okay. Hang on. We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Shelton, Brett Fountain, [55:35.220 --> 55:41.700] Wheel of Life Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. I'm not sure if it's working or not, [55:41.700 --> 55:43.220] but you can give it a try. [55:50.660 --> 55:55.860] This is the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they [55:55.860 --> 56:01.700] struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the [56:01.700 --> 56:08.020] process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. [56:08.740 --> 56:14.500] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than [56:14.500 --> 56:21.140] 1000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [56:21.140 --> 56:26.180] providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [56:26.820 --> 56:31.540] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [56:32.100 --> 56:42.500] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [56:42.500 --> 56:48.820] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [56:51.860 --> 56:58.020] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [57:00.580 --> 57:04.340] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [57:04.340 --> 57:09.300] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on [57:09.300 --> 57:13.780] it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of [57:13.780 --> 57:19.940] your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, [57:19.940 --> 57:25.060] you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will [57:25.060 --> 57:30.900] start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to [57:30.900 --> 57:36.420] yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by [57:36.420 --> 57:43.780] Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [57:45.060 --> 57:50.020] Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. Think of how the number six [57:50.020 --> 57:55.780] is implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666. So it would fit right in that the seventh amendment [57:55.780 --> 58:01.620] would be about civil trials. Civil seven, civil trials, get it? Civil trials are ones where people [58:01.620 --> 58:06.500] sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, like the dividing line between properties. [58:06.500 --> 58:10.980] They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs. [58:10.980 --> 58:15.940] The seventh amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters [58:15.940 --> 58:20.660] instead of having a lone judge rule on the case. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news [58:20.660 --> 58:22.980] and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [58:22.980 --> 58:35.540] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution. They guarantee [58:35.540 --> 58:40.580] the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. [58:40.580 --> 58:44.580] Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your [58:44.580 --> 58:50.980] constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never [58:50.980 --> 58:56.260] get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, [58:56.260 --> 59:03.060] too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [59:03.060 --> 59:08.260] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [59:08.260 --> 59:14.260] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [59:15.780 --> 59:20.900] Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel, 1984, when Winston is threatened with his worst [59:20.900 --> 59:26.580] fear? That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face. But what if his worst fear [59:26.580 --> 59:31.620] was spiders? Eight-legged spiders, to be exact. Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty [59:31.620 --> 59:36.740] cruel and unusual. That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment. [59:36.740 --> 59:41.620] Our founding fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from creepy, [59:41.620 --> 59:46.420] crawly eight-legged punishments and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in [59:46.420 --> 59:51.140] their day. The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail [59:51.140 --> 59:57.540] and charging excessive fines. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:00:46.420 --> 01:01:02.500] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelly and Brett Fountainfield with our radio. [01:01:03.140 --> 01:01:11.540] And we're going to finish up with the issue on income tax. But first I wanted to ask Eric. Eric, [01:01:11.540 --> 01:01:19.940] are our phones working? Now they are, yeah. I've been diligent about ringing it, checking it, [01:01:19.940 --> 01:01:25.380] and as soon as I was available, I hit the phone line. So it's working now. [01:01:25.380 --> 01:01:28.900] Okay. I looked like you were there. I just wanted to make sure. [01:01:30.020 --> 01:01:40.420] Absolutely. You know how we can be distracted. Okay, about the tax court. That's interesting. [01:01:42.180 --> 01:01:50.900] That you're saying that the tax court on its face doesn't. Brett, you're kind of talking like the [01:01:50.900 --> 01:01:57.380] tax courts, not like the traffic courts or the low level courts who tend to rule against the [01:01:57.380 --> 01:02:03.060] pro se litigant out of hand without regard to the right of things. Are you saying? [01:02:03.700 --> 01:02:06.980] That has yet to be seen. I mean, for myself, I don't really know yet. [01:02:07.140 --> 01:02:14.260] What I read from Dan Pilla, he says, believe it or not, the tax court frequently rules and he says [01:02:14.900 --> 01:02:20.660] more than half of the time it's against the commissioner and it's in favor of the taxpayer. [01:02:21.860 --> 01:02:23.860] We'll see how they act with a non-tax payer. [01:02:26.340 --> 01:02:28.020] That will be interesting. Okay. [01:02:32.100 --> 01:02:34.340] We finished with this subject. Did I miss something? [01:02:35.300 --> 01:02:43.220] Nope. Well, so right now they've gotten to the end of their 60 days and they gave on day 59, they [01:02:43.220 --> 01:02:51.060] gave their technically attempted to answer, but it was really frivolous. So I ripped it to shreds. [01:02:51.060 --> 01:02:52.420] Standard BS answer. [01:02:53.380 --> 01:03:02.580] Yeah. It was an attempt to do general denials. So I highlighted how their document, [01:03:03.380 --> 01:03:12.020] which was titled answer, was non-compliant with the tax court rules 36, 33, and needed to be [01:03:12.020 --> 01:03:19.220] stricken as a rule 52 says. And so I just kind of highlighted all this says general denials are [01:03:19.220 --> 01:03:23.780] forbidden by rule 55. And I pointed out this and that and just ripped them up, [01:03:23.780 --> 01:03:32.260] flashed them back and forth. And it was kind of fun. And then I moved to have their answer stricken. [01:03:32.580 --> 01:03:39.300] And then I said, you know, in the conclusion and prayer part, you sometimes will have multiple [01:03:39.300 --> 01:03:45.620] things that you ask the court to do. So I asked the court to strike their answer. And then I asked [01:03:45.620 --> 01:03:52.500] the court to render a default judgment or in the alternative, require the other party to give a [01:03:52.500 --> 01:03:58.420] more definite statement as per this rule and per that rule and so forth. Well, what I didn't know [01:03:58.420 --> 01:04:03.460] and just learned was that in the tax court, you're not allowed to do that. You can't put [01:04:03.460 --> 01:04:11.060] multiple things into a motion. You know, we frequently see that in civil courts. We say [01:04:11.620 --> 01:04:18.500] it's kind of like a way to conserve judicial resources. Go ahead and ask for this or in [01:04:18.500 --> 01:04:21.860] the alternative, ask for that. Judicial economy. [01:04:22.580 --> 01:04:27.860] Yes. You show good cause for both of the things and you hope they'll do the first. And if they [01:04:27.860 --> 01:04:33.300] don't, well, then here's a good reason why they should do the second. But in tax court, they say [01:04:33.300 --> 01:04:41.220] that's an impermissible joiner of motions. So I said, okay, no problem. And I put in another motion [01:04:41.220 --> 01:04:50.820] to strike same day and just took out the rest of the stuff about anything else. I made one issue. [01:04:50.900 --> 01:04:58.820] I said, I'm moving the court to strike their answer, period. Then I said, and any other [01:05:00.740 --> 01:05:07.300] relief that this court might find appropriate under the circumstances, for example, [01:05:09.540 --> 01:05:17.140] and I listed a few other things. Default judgment and sanction the attorneys for violating this rule [01:05:17.140 --> 01:05:22.180] and that rule and sanction the attorneys for their perjury because of their impossibly [01:05:22.180 --> 01:05:32.340] inconsistent statements. So yeah, I managed to slip some of that back in there. [01:05:32.340 --> 01:05:34.660] You're violating one of the unspoken rules. [01:05:36.900 --> 01:05:40.020] Embarrassing an attorney. You can't have this much fun. [01:05:41.460 --> 01:05:44.580] Oh, that's right. I forgot. Sorry. [01:05:44.580 --> 01:05:47.540] You're supposed to be distraught and miserable and stressed. [01:05:49.060 --> 01:05:53.140] But it's too fun when they just pitch you a softball like this. [01:05:57.140 --> 01:05:59.780] Okay. So where are we now with your case? [01:06:01.060 --> 01:06:04.660] Well, the next thing is that my motion to strike needs to be set for hearing. [01:06:05.940 --> 01:06:08.340] And we'll see what happens. [01:06:08.900 --> 01:06:16.340] What did the rules say about the requirement of opposing counsel to respond? [01:06:17.700 --> 01:06:26.020] They don't have a requirement. They do have a, I believe it's a 45 day or a 30 day. I forget [01:06:26.020 --> 01:06:32.420] which they get. They have 45 days and then I have 30 days to respond to that. [01:06:33.380 --> 01:06:39.380] But they can file an opposition in 45 days and you can file a rebuttal within 30 days. [01:06:39.380 --> 01:06:41.780] That's about double of what's in the federal court. [01:06:42.420 --> 01:06:42.740] Yes. [01:06:47.300 --> 01:06:52.180] So has their time expired to file a response? [01:06:54.100 --> 01:06:57.300] Yes, they're way past that 60 day mark now. [01:06:57.940 --> 01:06:59.860] Have you filed for default judgment? [01:07:00.820 --> 01:07:04.900] No, because now they have an answer. Technically they have a document that's sitting there called [01:07:04.900 --> 01:07:08.020] answer. Once I get that stricken, then I'll file for default judgment. [01:07:09.460 --> 01:07:13.620] Now mean in the meantime, check this out. [01:07:13.620 --> 01:07:21.460] Wait a minute. Did their answer respond specifically to all of the issues before them? [01:07:22.500 --> 01:07:26.900] No, and that was part of the problem. That's why I said it was frivolous and empty. [01:07:27.460 --> 01:07:30.420] And I hope I didn't hurt their feelings. [01:07:31.300 --> 01:07:37.380] Any issue which they did not address directly should you should move for default judgment. [01:07:40.580 --> 01:07:42.020] And that's what I said in my [01:07:43.780 --> 01:07:48.420] relief that the court might find appropriate under the circumstances. For example. [01:07:48.420 --> 01:07:52.660] Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You got to stop being ahead of me this way. [01:07:53.700 --> 01:07:54.740] Oh, yeah. [01:07:54.740 --> 01:07:58.420] Who's going to think I'm the guru know it all if you're ahead of me this way. [01:08:01.220 --> 01:08:03.140] It is great. This is perfect. [01:08:03.860 --> 01:08:11.380] It has been fun. So yeah, meanwhile, while these this answer has been [01:08:12.100 --> 01:08:16.500] awaited and eventually showed up on next to the last day of their deadline. [01:08:17.700 --> 01:08:22.740] And while I'm waiting for the court to rule on this motion to strike, [01:08:23.700 --> 01:08:30.260] the discovery I already put discovery out started with discovery requests for admissions. [01:08:31.620 --> 01:08:38.980] And I got some pretty some pretty solid statements in there that would destroy [01:08:38.980 --> 01:08:45.380] their case if they admit that is true. And guess what? They've gone past the time that [01:08:45.380 --> 01:08:47.540] is allowed for them to answer. [01:08:48.420 --> 01:08:52.260] So they defaulted and thereby admitted everything. [01:08:52.980 --> 01:09:00.980] Yes. I also did some request for production and request for I did some discovery interrogatories. [01:09:02.580 --> 01:09:04.180] And they haven't answered those either. [01:09:05.780 --> 01:09:11.060] Now the prop the proper way to handle that is a motion to compel discovery or compel [01:09:11.060 --> 01:09:17.540] cooperation with discovery. And depending on what happens with this motion to strike, [01:09:17.540 --> 01:09:23.140] like I don't want to muddy the waters right now. But if if it turns out that [01:09:24.100 --> 01:09:28.900] the judge is going to allow them to, you know, take however many months they feel like to [01:09:28.900 --> 01:09:38.500] eventually answer. Well, then we're going to ask the court to compel cooperation with discovery. [01:09:39.220 --> 01:09:44.740] Because I've got these discovery requests that have been out there already. And they've [01:09:44.740 --> 01:09:49.540] already violated the rules that require them to answer within a certain number of days. [01:09:50.340 --> 01:09:57.860] So just like with the civil court, when they don't answer admissions, it is deemed admitted. [01:09:59.460 --> 01:10:06.020] And when they don't answer your interrogatories and your request for production and so forth, [01:10:06.260 --> 01:10:14.980] then that triggers a need for you to compel or to move the court to compel their cooperation. [01:10:19.220 --> 01:10:26.500] So that's where we are right now. It sounds like you since they refuse to pose your [01:10:27.860 --> 01:10:32.820] assertions, your allegations, sounds like we have a default judgment challenge. [01:10:33.300 --> 01:10:40.260] Quiet. Yeah, or at least a summary judgment. Because they said this is their answer. [01:10:41.460 --> 01:10:44.900] And even though general denials are explicitly forbidden, [01:10:46.660 --> 01:10:53.460] if it gets treated as if, I mean, if the court treats this so called answer as [01:10:54.340 --> 01:11:00.180] legit denying everything. Okay, well, then they've provided zero facts. [01:11:01.140 --> 01:11:02.820] And we can ask for summary judgment. [01:11:02.820 --> 01:11:11.060] Yeah, if they had specific facts, if you had something to demonstrate that [01:11:11.060 --> 01:11:16.740] they were absolutely, judge had caused a rule against them, then you could get default. [01:11:16.740 --> 01:11:23.380] Or if they fail to adequately respond, default. But if they respond and the response is BS, [01:11:24.020 --> 01:11:33.540] all right, I didn't say that right. They failed to respond. Or if their response is non-responsive. [01:11:35.700 --> 01:11:40.500] Yeah, fluff. If you say they did this, that or the other and they said, [01:11:41.300 --> 01:11:44.500] we stood on our heads and squawk like a chicken. [01:11:45.780 --> 01:11:50.660] And if standing on your head and squawk like a chicken has nothing to do with what you alleged [01:11:50.660 --> 01:11:53.940] against them. Yeah, they just said. [01:11:53.940 --> 01:12:00.420] Response is non-responsive. They just said without knowledge sufficient, so therefore denied. [01:12:04.180 --> 01:12:11.060] Point I'm making here is they have to give a substantive response. [01:12:13.060 --> 01:12:17.220] The only substance they have, Randy, is their lack of knowledge as attorneys. [01:12:17.940 --> 01:12:20.340] And that's not substantive. That's all they've got. [01:12:20.820 --> 01:12:27.780] So the other side is generally always gonna file a response. But it may be just like this one. [01:12:28.820 --> 01:12:36.100] What I'm suggesting to everybody is look at their response. If the response is just word salad [01:12:37.940 --> 01:12:46.900] and doesn't address the specific issues before the court, then their answer is non-responsive. [01:12:47.540 --> 01:12:53.460] Right. So then you can move for summary judgment, [01:12:53.460 --> 01:12:56.100] but not responding to the issues that you brought. [01:12:58.740 --> 01:13:02.260] That make sense? Absolutely. [01:13:06.660 --> 01:13:09.460] All of law really makes sense. [01:13:09.460 --> 01:13:18.740] It has been carefully crafted for some 800 years, at least. [01:13:20.740 --> 01:13:23.380] Of generation after generation after generation. [01:13:24.100 --> 01:13:30.180] Every horrible rotten low down tool attack anybody can come up with, somebody's already [01:13:30.180 --> 01:13:41.620] come up with it. And if you pay attention, then you don't argue BS. Call out BS. [01:13:42.740 --> 01:13:48.500] Ask the court to strike us on BS. Is that sophisticated enough, Brett? [01:13:50.820 --> 01:13:54.740] Calling it BS, I like it. Here and after BS. [01:13:55.380 --> 01:13:56.180] We'll be right back. [01:14:00.180 --> 01:14:04.260] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of his word? [01:14:04.820 --> 01:14:10.020] Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for [01:14:10.020 --> 01:14:15.780] scripture talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15. [01:14:16.500 --> 01:14:20.980] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [01:14:20.980 --> 01:14:26.100] rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the [01:14:26.100 --> 01:14:30.820] Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [01:14:30.820 --> 01:14:35.620] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [01:14:35.620 --> 01:14:40.580] and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to [01:14:40.580 --> 01:14:45.780] all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves [01:14:45.780 --> 01:14:50.980] more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to scripture talk live on [01:14:50.980 --> 01:14:56.660] logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your [01:14:56.660 --> 01:15:03.700] studies of the scriptures. Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved [01:15:03.700 --> 01:15:08.660] except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves [01:15:08.660 --> 01:15:14.500] and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic [01:15:14.500 --> 01:15:19.700] environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, [01:15:19.700 --> 01:15:25.380] adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need. Logos [01:15:25.380 --> 01:15:31.060] Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We [01:15:31.060 --> 01:15:37.540] have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, [01:15:37.540 --> 01:15:44.260] Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve [01:15:44.260 --> 01:15:49.620] as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy, [01:15:49.620 --> 01:15:54.580] you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, [01:15:54.580 --> 01:15:59.060] help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. [01:16:14.260 --> 01:16:15.860] Ain't gonna blind me [01:16:19.860 --> 01:16:21.060] Don't bore me [01:16:30.580 --> 01:16:34.500] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again [01:16:35.460 --> 01:16:40.500] I was blindsided but now I can see your plan [01:16:40.580 --> 01:16:45.700] You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand [01:16:45.700 --> 01:16:49.700] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again [01:16:54.660 --> 01:16:58.660] Okay, we are back with the Young Jeopardy Mountain Radio. [01:16:59.780 --> 01:17:07.940] We have been pontificating all kinds of legal conclusions pontificating. [01:17:08.900 --> 01:17:10.340] Is that what those sounds were? [01:17:11.140 --> 01:17:15.620] We got a we got a new pope so we were pope tisicate but anyway [01:17:18.020 --> 01:17:22.740] we're going to cut cut that out and go to Eric in Massachusetts. [01:17:24.660 --> 01:17:25.780] I say that right Eric? [01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:27.780] Sure sounds good. [01:17:29.780 --> 01:17:30.340] What do you have? [01:17:30.340 --> 01:17:37.780] All right so all right we got we got 45 minutes so it's limited time so all we only [01:17:37.780 --> 01:17:39.540] okay we only have two more callers. [01:17:40.980 --> 01:17:47.700] All answers no stories okay so okay wait wait we got Chris from California and we have Ted [01:17:48.340 --> 01:17:56.340] from in Colorado sorry California I'm sorry Chris I did not mean to insult you. [01:17:56.340 --> 01:18:03.060] We have Chris in Colorado and Ted in California so if you have good content [01:18:03.060 --> 01:18:07.140] we'll just blow these guys off and yeah go ahead. [01:18:08.020 --> 01:18:11.540] All right so this is this is important this is what we all need to be doing. [01:18:13.460 --> 01:18:20.500] So going back to my tyrannical judge who's not a judge who's been working well past his [01:18:20.500 --> 01:18:23.380] 90 days and past his 70 years old. [01:18:26.580 --> 01:18:30.420] Wait a minute wait a minute 70 only only 70? [01:18:31.140 --> 01:18:37.860] In in the state that's in the state of Massachusetts the constitutional amendment from 1972 [01:18:38.580 --> 01:18:44.260] he can adjudicate only beyond only to 70 years old and that at that point as I say [01:18:44.260 --> 01:18:48.260] Cinderella's dress disappears at midnight and he can no longer adjudicate. [01:18:50.340 --> 01:18:55.220] I'm 75 and I'm looking down for that two two okay go ahead. [01:18:55.220 --> 01:19:00.660] Putting him in the grave it doesn't put him or you in the grave it just allows you to educate [01:19:00.660 --> 01:19:05.540] people like myself and that would be great if he educated people on how to adjudicate properly but [01:19:05.540 --> 01:19:10.980] I'm never sure that he actually knew how to do that to begin with so well not if he can't follow [01:19:10.980 --> 01:19:20.340] the law that says how what the limit is for him exactly that's kind of basic so exactly so going [01:19:20.340 --> 01:19:28.020] back to this judge and this specific scenario which I presented to you in the past the judge [01:19:28.020 --> 01:19:36.420] is somehow moving a criminal complaint he's a civil court judge in this eviction process that's [01:19:36.420 --> 01:19:45.860] all civil court the board of health it has the capacity under the statutes we argued this [01:19:46.340 --> 01:19:51.940] I don't know almost a year ago with Eddie under the statutes they're allowed to bring forth [01:19:53.060 --> 01:20:01.460] a criminal complaint in this case there's no criminal issue they don't have any criminal [01:20:01.460 --> 01:20:05.220] code but they're bringing forth a criminal complaint that's the whole separate whatever [01:20:05.860 --> 01:20:12.660] so what I don't understand is somehow this civil judge is able to [01:20:13.380 --> 01:20:23.700] stay and un-stay and manipulate and control when this criminal show cause hearing will take place [01:20:24.660 --> 01:20:32.420] before a magistrate it's it can't be legal it makes no sense it's some creation well [01:20:32.980 --> 01:20:36.820] maybe hearing before what you're just saying what you just said [01:20:37.700 --> 01:20:42.180] uh actually clarifies things in favor of the judge [01:20:44.420 --> 01:20:49.940] you said that he and correct me if I'm wrong there may be other pieces that need to fit into this [01:20:49.940 --> 01:20:57.620] but just the factors that are just mentioned here he's not allowed to adjudicate beyond the [01:20:57.620 --> 01:21:03.060] age of 70 but it doesn't say that he's not allowed to do any administrative functions [01:21:03.220 --> 01:21:07.060] that's at least what you've just given us to work with I don't know I haven't read your [01:21:07.780 --> 01:21:15.540] well any of those documents but if he's merely doing an adjudicate a non-adjudicative function [01:21:15.540 --> 01:21:21.220] of saying uh let's set this thing for a hearing on such and such a date before that magistrate [01:21:21.220 --> 01:21:24.820] then the magistrate's the one who's going to do the adjudicative functions right [01:21:26.340 --> 01:21:31.380] um yeah I mean you're kind of you're kind of mixing the two separate sort of issues which is [01:21:31.380 --> 01:21:36.340] sort of issues which is you know it's a good question but I don't think I think any judge [01:21:37.460 --> 01:21:43.460] could be doing the same thing so the question is can this judge can any judge in a civil court [01:21:44.340 --> 01:21:52.340] somehow control a criminal show cause hearing in the criminal court how is that [01:21:52.340 --> 01:22:00.820] well the question is whether or not the the bar to his actions are merely adjudicative [01:22:01.460 --> 01:22:07.780] or do they just bar him from even sitting behind the bench and doing anything is he does he need [01:22:07.780 --> 01:22:15.140] to get off of there as a judge or can he sit in his office and not hear cases and do adjudication [01:22:15.140 --> 01:22:24.660] but he can still order toilet paper and handle things around the office let's remove let's remove [01:22:24.660 --> 01:22:33.940] the at the aspect that he's a that's over 70 let's just let's say any judge can any judge [01:22:37.220 --> 01:22:45.380] in a civil court control have control over a criminal show cause hearing the filing is not [01:22:45.380 --> 01:22:52.420] to him the filing is to the criminal court so that the board of health makes a criminal uh [01:22:52.420 --> 01:22:57.860] criminal hearing or criminal complaint to the criminal court and the criminal court then sets [01:22:57.860 --> 01:23:06.020] up a show cause hearing there's no connection okay and somehow this judge is staying and [01:23:06.020 --> 01:23:11.700] unstaying this criminal show cause for more than a year which you know you can't have this got to [01:23:11.700 --> 01:23:17.940] have some due process limitation here or you know speedy trial that type of thing again it's a show [01:23:17.940 --> 01:23:23.780] cause it's not a trial but still within reason i can't you can't have hanging over your head for [01:23:23.780 --> 01:23:29.140] well over a year well you might go to jail you might not go to jail you know that's crazy [01:23:31.540 --> 01:23:39.620] so again my question is how can how can i mean maybe there's a possibility how can a civil [01:23:39.620 --> 01:23:45.460] or judge have some you know reach into the criminal court [01:23:51.620 --> 01:23:52.260] any ideas [01:23:54.980 --> 01:24:01.060] i don't know and uh it could go to whether that particular man or woman [01:24:01.700 --> 01:24:10.420] uh is uh is operating in two different courts or in cause i know there are in texas there are courts [01:24:10.420 --> 01:24:20.660] that have been assigned or conferred statutorily jurisdiction over both they can handle civil [01:24:20.660 --> 01:24:27.140] matters and they can handle criminal matters and so i don't know if maybe he's in this this [01:24:27.220 --> 01:24:34.260] particular judge is in one of those courts or if that even exists in massachusetts at all i'm not [01:24:34.260 --> 01:24:44.180] sure yeah he is he is the first uh first justice of this district court which is you know kind of [01:24:44.180 --> 01:24:50.900] funny because three or four months before he turned 70 he took he was given this position [01:24:51.700 --> 01:25:00.100] which suggests that the you know the the judiciary had no intention on this man ever [01:25:00.100 --> 01:25:07.620] only serving 90 days that suggests permanency you know so which is you know again horrifying i don't [01:25:07.620 --> 01:25:14.420] think i think these whole recall laws at no point were ever used properly i think they've always [01:25:14.420 --> 01:25:21.700] been abusing them since day one i've come to that realization now that they've always abused it [01:25:22.660 --> 01:25:30.660] but that's a separate issue so so i need to find out if it's possible for somehow [01:25:32.500 --> 01:25:39.460] be it a first judge justice or uh there's somehow a connection between the two i just [01:25:39.460 --> 01:25:47.140] to me it doesn't feel right it's there because they're using it as a means to oppress to threaten [01:25:47.140 --> 01:25:53.140] to bully landlords in this situation well if you don't do this we're going to do a criminal charge [01:25:53.140 --> 01:26:01.140] against you that's what it is yeah and they're they're effectively using it as a way to get [01:26:01.140 --> 01:26:05.220] around following the law because the law is clear about 70 years old [01:26:05.460 --> 01:26:11.380] well again it this the issue that i'm bringing right here right now this really i'm not bringing [01:26:11.380 --> 01:26:16.180] the age aspect into it because i think any judge could do this and maybe again it's because he's [01:26:16.180 --> 01:26:24.500] the first justice not just you know but i i think any judge could do this whether he's 50 or 74 or [01:26:24.500 --> 01:26:31.220] whatever i think a judge can somehow do this potentially or he's abusing the process i don't [01:26:31.220 --> 01:26:36.900] know that's what i'm trying to figure out what do you think randy is it possible that a judge is [01:26:36.900 --> 01:26:38.900] abusing the process [01:26:45.540 --> 01:26:46.740] he's already asleep [01:26:48.820 --> 01:26:53.140] well i do think you're on to something there we'll have to find out what does massachusetts [01:26:53.140 --> 01:26:54.660] have to say about it [01:27:01.620 --> 01:27:08.660] reality tv sugar obesity jet lag the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing [01:27:08.660 --> 01:27:13.540] but now researchers say we can add stress to the list i'm dr catherine albrecht back with [01:27:13.540 --> 01:27:20.100] details in a moment privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get [01:27:20.100 --> 01:27:26.260] it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so [01:27:26.260 --> 01:27:32.500] protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's [01:27:32.500 --> 01:27:38.180] worth hanging on to this message is brought to you by startpage.com the private search engine [01:27:38.180 --> 01:27:46.020] alternative to google yahoo and bing start over with startpage are you always on the go and [01:27:46.020 --> 01:27:51.380] juggling multiple projects if so you might think that multitasking proves you're smart [01:27:51.380 --> 01:27:57.380] but think again all that stress might be eating your brain a new study finds stress reduces the [01:27:57.380 --> 01:28:01.940] number of connections between neurons which actually makes it harder for people to manage [01:28:01.940 --> 01:28:07.540] problems researchers at yale university found that stressed out people have less gray matter [01:28:07.540 --> 01:28:12.900] in their prefrontal cortex that's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and [01:28:12.900 --> 01:28:19.220] regulate our emotions so take a deep breath and chill out it'll help keep your mind as sharp as [01:28:19.220 --> 01:28:24.980] attack i'm dr kathryn albrecht for startpage.com the world's most private search engine [01:28:30.020 --> 01:28:35.620] this is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of september 11 the [01:28:35.620 --> 01:28:41.380] government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a [01:28:41.380 --> 01:28:45.940] controlled demolition over 6 000 of my fellow service members have given their lives thousands [01:28:45.940 --> 01:28:50.500] of my fellow first responders are dying i'm not a conspiracy theorist i'm a structural engineer i'm [01:28:50.500 --> 01:28:54.660] a new york city correction officer i'm an air force pilot i'm a father who lost his son we're [01:28:54.660 --> 01:29:02.100] americans and we deserve the truth go to rememberbuildingseven.org today rule of law [01:29:02.100 --> 01:29:06.260] radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we live in an us [01:29:06.260 --> 01:29:10.100] against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to [01:29:10.100 --> 01:29:14.340] have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from [01:29:14.340 --> 01:29:18.340] place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due [01:29:18.340 --> 01:29:23.140] process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and [01:29:23.140 --> 01:29:27.380] preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy eddie craig in conjunction with [01:29:27.380 --> 01:29:30.980] rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will [01:29:30.980 --> 01:29:35.460] help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law you can get your [01:29:35.460 --> 01:29:40.180] own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio.com and ordering your copy today [01:29:40.180 --> 01:29:44.260] by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus [01:29:44.260 --> 01:29:48.900] the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and other [01:29:48.900 --> 01:29:52.580] useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from [01:29:52.580 --> 01:29:58.180] ruleoflawradio.com order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve [01:30:01.540 --> 01:30:06.580] you are listening to the logos radio network logosradionetwork.com [01:30:06.580 --> 01:30:10.900] huh [01:30:10.900 --> 01:30:14.900] Yeah, and who you want to chip? Who you take me for? Freetall, eh? [01:30:14.900 --> 01:30:18.900] Who you want to chip? Me no Freetall, eh? You can't chip me. [01:30:18.900 --> 01:30:23.900] Homosack. Don't let them chip you in the morning. Chip you in the evening. [01:30:23.900 --> 01:30:27.900] Put a chip in your body. And anyway, you go computer reading. [01:30:27.900 --> 01:30:32.900] You can't hide me from nobody. When me say, chip in your mom. Chip in your daddy. [01:30:32.900 --> 01:30:37.900] Chip in your grandpa and the granny. Chip in me. Chip in your baby. [01:30:37.900 --> 01:30:42.900] Chip in your family, whole family. Chip in your dog and the cat around me. [01:30:42.900 --> 01:30:47.900] Chip in the beef and you still go eat it. Chip in the fish, them all in the sea. [01:30:47.900 --> 01:30:52.900] Chip in the shark and the whale around me. You must be mankind, you ain't chip crazy. [01:30:52.900 --> 01:30:56.900] That's the kind of thing man, they want to read it. Social security, they go tell me. [01:30:56.900 --> 01:30:59.900] Number with them, give me them, repeat up your C. [01:31:00.900 --> 01:31:12.900] Randy Kelton Britt found in the radio and a civil judge issuing a stay of binding on a criminal court. [01:31:12.900 --> 01:31:21.900] Well, and specifically the magistrate that would do probable cause hearing to make a determination whether or not the criminal court can commence a case. [01:31:21.900 --> 01:31:27.900] The criminal court cannot have any claim, any jurisdiction over the magistrate. [01:31:27.900 --> 01:31:32.900] As the criminal court would not have subject matter jurisdiction. [01:31:32.900 --> 01:31:34.900] You mean civil? [01:31:34.900 --> 01:31:43.900] I'm sorry, yes. Civil court have no, but either the criminal or the civil, it doesn't matter which one it was. [01:31:43.900 --> 01:31:46.900] Oh, you're right, good point. [01:31:47.900 --> 01:31:53.900] Until there's a determination by a magistrate, neither one of them have jurisdiction. [01:31:55.900 --> 01:31:57.900] Explain that again, please. [01:31:57.900 --> 01:32:12.900] If the primary requirement after arrest is that a magistrate, a unbiased magistrate make a determination of probable cause. [01:32:12.900 --> 01:32:17.900] If there is no probable cause, there is no jurisdiction. [01:32:17.900 --> 01:32:27.900] Until that magistrate makes a determination of probable cause, nobody has any jurisdiction in the matter of a criminal accusation. [01:32:29.900 --> 01:32:36.900] So what's supposed to happen, Eric, is at that probable cause hearing, the rules of evidence kick in. [01:32:37.900 --> 01:32:43.900] And you can't just go off of, he said, she said, you have to get some people up on the stand and swear them in. [01:32:43.900 --> 01:32:49.900] It doesn't matter about their belief and upon belief and information anymore. [01:32:49.900 --> 01:32:51.900] That's enough to get them to the probable cause hearing. [01:32:51.900 --> 01:32:58.900] But at the probable cause hearing, that magistrate's determination is based on a finding of facts. [01:32:59.900 --> 01:33:05.900] So there has to be those facts presented as admissible evidence. [01:33:05.900 --> 01:33:17.900] There's a significant bar for, or a significant, oh, bar is probably not the right word, a significant hurdle for an accuser to get over there. [01:33:18.900 --> 01:33:32.900] And then once there's been a finding from the magistrate, then the magistrate will say, hey, this person needs to be bound over to such and such superior court for a criminal case. [01:33:32.900 --> 01:33:38.900] Then the prosecutor will go and draw up the pleadings, the primary pleadings, and send them to that court. [01:33:38.900 --> 01:33:41.900] Before that, no court has jurisdiction. [01:33:41.900 --> 01:33:53.900] The only person in the criminal justice system who could have prior jurisdiction would be a magistrate. [01:33:53.900 --> 01:34:06.900] If I have reason to believe and do believe that a crime has been committed, nobody has any duty to pay attention to me except the magistrate. [01:34:07.900 --> 01:34:23.900] And if I give the magistrate enough information to give a reasonable person of ordinary prudence cause to believe that a crime has been committed and the accused, the named individual has committed that crime, [01:34:23.900 --> 01:34:30.900] then the judge has a duty to issue a warrant to bring that person before this court for a determination of probable cause. [01:34:30.900 --> 01:34:34.900] Up to this point, nobody else has any jurisdiction. [01:34:35.900 --> 01:34:37.900] Civil or criminal? [01:34:37.900 --> 01:34:49.900] Right. If the magistrate finds probable cause, he's to issue an order and file it with the court of jurisdiction and the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [01:34:49.900 --> 01:34:57.900] And that moves jurisdiction from the magistrate to the court. Without that, there's no jurisdiction. [01:34:58.900 --> 01:35:20.900] So I think you're asking a very pertinent question here when you're saying, how is this judge getting, or any civil judge, 70 or not, how is he getting the authority to speak into this magistrate's docket? [01:35:20.900 --> 01:35:30.900] Precisely. I realize that most of the courts in every state tend to ignore this for the most part. [01:35:30.900 --> 01:35:43.900] That's because you got this guy that got a ticket, or he got arrested for some third class C or third degree misdemeanor, and it's a minor thing and he makes a deal. [01:35:44.900 --> 01:35:56.900] So 90% of the people don't object to, don't raise this issue. But that does not mean that when somebody does raise this issue, they can ignore it. [01:35:56.900 --> 01:36:10.900] And what I've been moved toward is I want to ask them to do things that they're going to think they don't have to do to set them up so I can land on them. [01:36:10.900 --> 01:36:19.900] So instead of us complaining, I didn't do what he was supposed to do, let's jump up down and clap our hands and fight against him. [01:36:21.900 --> 01:36:31.900] Even if you're in court, you're having these hearings, you file criminally against him with another court and ask the other court to disqualify him. Am I making sense, Brett? [01:36:31.900 --> 01:36:33.900] Me? Yeah. [01:36:33.900 --> 01:36:44.900] They don't get to do anything they want to. I do, and you do as a citizen in a republic, we can do anything we want to. [01:36:44.900 --> 01:37:01.900] Unless the law specifically forbids us from doing a thing. Public officials on the other hand, they only do what they are specifically authorized to do. [01:37:02.900 --> 01:37:09.900] So what's Eric going to do about this? What's his best next step? [01:37:13.900 --> 01:37:14.900] This. [01:37:16.900 --> 01:37:18.900] That's for you, Randy. I'm waiting for your answer. [01:37:20.900 --> 01:37:24.900] Reorient me to this. What are they going to do about this? [01:37:25.900 --> 01:37:31.900] So how do I unwind this? Do I file a federal claim? What's my claim? What do I do? [01:37:36.900 --> 01:37:38.900] Brett, I lost track. [01:37:39.900 --> 01:38:03.900] Oh, I'm just wondering, what is your suggestion for Eric's next step in the situation where a judge has overstepped his authority, or seemingly, and he's presuming to have authority to speak into a magistrate's docket? [01:38:03.900 --> 01:38:14.900] Most of the time when this kind of thing occurred, the go-to procedure is a petition for clarification. [01:38:17.900 --> 01:38:25.900] Or a motion for clarification. I'm sorry, I said petition. Technically, that's incorrect. A motion for clarification. [01:38:26.900 --> 01:38:34.900] You indicate in your pleading what you think is unclear and ask the court to commit itself. [01:38:39.900 --> 01:38:47.900] Well, I'd like to do more than that. I'd like to do maybe a federal claim, a declaratory judgment. [01:38:48.900 --> 01:38:49.900] Okay, you can do both at the same time. [01:38:49.900 --> 01:39:09.900] If you're in a state court, and the state court's screwing up, and they violate a federally protected right, there's nothing to prevent you from going after them for the federally protected right while you're still adjudicating the state issue. [01:39:09.900 --> 01:39:29.900] Okay, I mean, it's a minor issue, but it would allow me to have the judge dismissed from my case. And again, it is an important issue because they're, what they're doing is they're... [01:39:29.900 --> 01:39:35.900] No, no. When it comes to due process, there are no minor issues. [01:39:35.900 --> 01:39:36.900] Yeah, I agree. [01:39:39.900 --> 01:39:55.900] Fair enough. So it is a major issue. They're using it as a means to oppress landlords. So what one of the magistrates told me, I asked him, hey, how does this work? What's going on? [01:39:56.900 --> 01:40:14.900] I said, I don't want to have this show cause hearing, and I don't get notice, and I don't appear. And he goes, oh, no, don't worry. It moves with the docket. If you don't get a notice, it's going with your docket related to eviction. [01:40:14.900 --> 01:40:20.900] Wait a minute. If you don't get a notice, what does that mean? [01:40:20.900 --> 01:40:21.900] Notice to hear. [01:40:21.900 --> 01:40:22.900] Yeah. [01:40:22.900 --> 01:40:35.900] Does that mean if you cannot prove that you did not get a notice, or does it mean that if the other side cannot prove that you got a notice? [01:40:35.900 --> 01:40:52.900] Right. And we kind of had this discussion before where they, you know, I don't get a notice and I don't appear and what have you. But again, a notice to appear. But again, what they're doing is it moves with my civil case, with my eviction case. That's crazy. [01:40:52.900 --> 01:40:58.900] Okay, hang on. Randy Shelton, Brett Fountain moves our radio. We'll be right back. [01:41:05.900 --> 01:41:16.900] Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on? Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost? [01:41:16.900 --> 01:41:31.900] The CHAMP plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay. [01:41:31.900 --> 01:41:50.900] If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes. The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit. [01:41:50.900 --> 01:41:58.900] Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com. [01:41:58.900 --> 01:42:13.900] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:42:13.900 --> 01:42:26.900] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [01:42:26.900 --> 01:42:41.900] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:42:41.900 --> 01:42:59.900] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:43:11.900 --> 01:43:21.900] You got busted, man? Aw, man, I'm broke, dude. [01:43:21.900 --> 01:43:38.900] Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully. Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the bully. [01:43:38.900 --> 01:43:43.900] There's always a room at the top of the hill. [01:43:43.900 --> 01:44:01.900] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelly and Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. And if I sound a little dingy, I apologize. I woke up two o'clock this morning and brought my system up, and it did not see the Windows partition on my hard drive. [01:44:01.900 --> 01:44:18.900] Made your big time crash. I spent most of the day trying to get the system back up. So I'm a little bit whacked. So if I seem a little bit out of sorts, I apologize. [01:44:18.900 --> 01:44:27.900] You know how I feel about Microsoft, but I'm not sure we can blame all the whacked stuff on Microsoft in this particular instance. [01:44:27.900 --> 01:44:37.900] No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I want to. Cut me some slack here. I'm old. [01:44:37.900 --> 01:44:50.900] I've been all day. I tried to create a image on a separate disk, and I've been all day trying to get it to do that, and it gets right up to the end and then it fails. [01:44:50.900 --> 01:45:09.900] So I use the screaming cost method. That didn't work. Pray to God about it and ask him to damn it. And I think he did. So I have to be careful what I asked for. Anyway, okay, where were we, Eric? [01:45:09.900 --> 01:45:31.900] Good question. We were talking about how to move this maybe in a federal court as a due process issue or something like that. I was explaining how it's crazy that this criminal show cause hearing somehow moves with the eviction case. [01:45:31.900 --> 01:45:43.900] So basically for 14, 15 months, my show cause hearing has been delayed, delayed, delayed, delayed or stayed. Although I did have one show cause hearing, which was kind of interesting. [01:45:43.900 --> 01:46:06.900] And yet here it is. So, you know, we last week, or is this the one where you have a renter in your property? Yep, yep, yep. Not paying rent and the courts are forbidding you to remove her so you can replace your paying customer. [01:46:07.900 --> 01:46:32.900] Exactly. And they will not allow me to do work at this point. The judge will not allow me to do work at this point, will not allow non-English speaking contractors to do work. It's getting crazy. I made a filing yesterday to the Supreme Court for an extraordinary petition, extraordinary relief petition, because this is so crazy. [01:46:33.900 --> 01:46:36.900] So that's good. I definitely want to hear. [01:46:36.900 --> 01:46:37.900] I agree with you. [01:46:37.900 --> 01:46:38.900] Yeah. [01:46:38.900 --> 01:46:56.900] But you know, these poor renters that can't pay their rent. Well, give me a break. What about these poor guys who have taken their life savings and purchased rental property so that they could provide for their retirement? [01:46:56.900 --> 01:47:10.900] And you get these people who've done nothing all their lives, created no value of their own. They move into your property and they don't pay you back. They have absolutely nothing to lose. [01:47:11.900 --> 01:47:20.900] And the court says you have to keep paying your mortgage on the overall property, even though this renter doesn't pay you. [01:47:20.900 --> 01:47:34.900] Right. And that's that's what I'm going to go towards, because this is overly abusive in Massachusetts. I mean, it's basically it's Rico, as I've explained to you in the past, you know, they're stealing from landlords. [01:47:34.900 --> 01:47:38.900] They're using landlords as their as their welfare system. [01:47:38.900 --> 01:47:42.900] But in doing so, they're also stealing from the IRS. [01:47:42.900 --> 01:47:45.900] That's theft. They're unjustly enriching the tenants. [01:47:45.900 --> 01:47:54.900] Right, because they're costing you all of this money. So you don't make any profit. So you don't owe any money to the IRS. [01:47:54.900 --> 01:48:04.900] Exactly. That's big. But they're in they're unjustly enriching these tenants, but they're also unjustly enriching themselves because they have people who are on welfare. [01:48:04.900 --> 01:48:09.900] Or or, you know, who get some benefits or whatever. [01:48:09.900 --> 01:48:20.900] And if those people don't have to move their rent doesn't go up or they don't have to deal with them or, you know, if there's a problem, well, then they don't have to pay that nine hundred dollars of, you know, subsidized housing money. [01:48:20.900 --> 01:48:23.900] They don't have to pay it to the landlord, maybe. [01:48:23.900 --> 01:48:28.900] So if they're benefiting the state also. [01:48:28.900 --> 01:48:31.900] So it's a big problem. [01:48:31.900 --> 01:48:44.900] That reminds me, my wife was just showing me where there was somebody who just bought a brand new BMW and was so upset that they're taking away her her her welfare food stamps. [01:48:44.900 --> 01:48:49.900] That's outrageous. [01:48:49.900 --> 01:48:54.900] You mean she can't even pay for it with her worth food stamps? [01:48:54.900 --> 01:49:01.900] All of all the mistreating mistreating things that could happen to that poor lady. [01:49:01.900 --> 01:49:13.900] For everybody who's listening, sometimes I when I'm talking to other officials and such, I state that I sometimes preach to the church the malcontents. [01:49:13.900 --> 01:49:22.900] A lot of my listeners, and I hope I don't piss everybody off, but they were raised with no discipline. [01:49:22.900 --> 01:49:27.900] Teaching and how to in consequences to life. [01:49:27.900 --> 01:49:38.900] They expect that the parents gave them everything, did everything for them and gave them no tools to deal with the real world. [01:49:38.900 --> 01:49:41.900] And they get out in the real world and the real world doesn't care. [01:49:41.900 --> 01:49:49.900] The parents gave them everything, did everything for them and gave them no tools to deal with the real world. [01:49:49.900 --> 01:49:54.900] And they get out in the real world and the real world doesn't kiss their behind, give them everything they want. [01:49:54.900 --> 01:50:00.900] And they just rail and righteous indignation at the inequity of it all. [01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:08.900] Had one caller wanted me to take over his suit and file suit for him. [01:50:08.900 --> 01:50:12.900] And when I said, yeah, I'll do that, but I'm going to have to charge you my time. [01:50:12.900 --> 01:50:16.900] He was absolutely indignant. [01:50:16.900 --> 01:50:25.900] How dare you ask me to pay for what I need. [01:50:25.900 --> 01:50:32.900] You owe me because of who I am. [01:50:32.900 --> 01:50:34.900] I hope. [01:50:34.900 --> 01:50:36.900] Brandy, Brandy, we got seven minutes. [01:50:36.900 --> 01:50:42.900] I need a I need an answer on how to get this to federal court. [01:50:42.900 --> 01:50:48.900] Yes. [01:50:48.900 --> 01:50:53.900] Anyone Brett, anyone? Seven minutes, six minutes. [01:50:53.900 --> 01:50:57.900] Okay, Brett, I lost track of where exactly where he was at. [01:50:57.900 --> 01:51:01.900] He's still harping on this about the civil judge. [01:51:01.900 --> 01:51:11.900] Why does a civil judge, why is a civil judge interfering in my magistrate probable cause hearing docket? [01:51:11.900 --> 01:51:14.900] And he I think you have done the right thing. [01:51:14.900 --> 01:51:17.900] Eric, you're reaching out for a declaratory judgment from the feds. [01:51:17.900 --> 01:51:20.900] And that sounds perfectly appropriate. [01:51:20.900 --> 01:51:23.900] You say you want to set up a federal action. [01:51:23.900 --> 01:51:30.900] I think you mean something besides declaratory judgment, like maybe a 1983 suit. [01:51:30.900 --> 01:51:35.900] And it sounds like that's what you're the answer you want to hear. [01:51:35.900 --> 01:51:39.900] And I don't see any reason why you can't go ahead and do that. [01:51:39.900 --> 01:51:41.900] I'm a little vague on the framework. [01:51:41.900 --> 01:51:43.900] What am I exactly? [01:51:43.900 --> 01:51:52.900] I'm struggling to find the framework of what I want to argue, what I want to say in terms of is it just with any kind of a 1983 suit or civil rights action? [01:51:52.900 --> 01:52:00.900] Whether it's even Bivens, if it's a federal actor, you have to find a federally protected right. [01:52:00.900 --> 01:52:07.900] So you don't talk about the state protections, you talk about the federal protections. [01:52:07.900 --> 01:52:13.900] So you would go towards something like your federally protected right to own property. [01:52:13.900 --> 01:52:20.900] And the prohibition against the feds interfering with a private contract. [01:52:21.900 --> 01:52:24.900] You have a rental contract. [01:52:24.900 --> 01:52:28.900] The feds have no business interfering with your rental contract. [01:52:28.900 --> 01:52:34.900] Well, then the state actors to have no business either, like this state judge. [01:52:34.900 --> 01:52:39.900] He can't interfere with that private contractor, even if he's so full of himself. [01:52:39.900 --> 01:52:42.900] I don't care how many black robes he has. [01:52:42.900 --> 01:52:45.900] He can't interfere with the private contract. [01:52:45.900 --> 01:52:47.900] And we use this. [01:52:47.900 --> 01:52:56.900] If a state judge interferes with a private contract, then he becomes liable in the fed. [01:52:56.900 --> 01:52:59.900] The fed forbade him to do that. [01:53:03.900 --> 01:53:05.900] So here's an interesting question for you. [01:53:05.900 --> 01:53:07.900] All right, so let's say I do file something. [01:53:07.900 --> 01:53:12.900] It gets accepted and we're moving along and I haven't done my amendment pleading. [01:53:12.900 --> 01:53:16.900] Can I turn around and add additional claims? [01:53:16.900 --> 01:53:20.900] So let's say I get it approved and I'm moving. [01:53:20.900 --> 01:53:23.900] And I say, oh, by the way, I want to add, I make an amended pleading. [01:53:23.900 --> 01:53:26.900] I go, this judge isn't a judge. [01:53:26.900 --> 01:53:29.900] How can he be adjudicating cases? [01:53:29.900 --> 01:53:33.900] That does not require an amended pleading. [01:53:33.900 --> 01:53:41.900] The amended pleading is only required when you want to make a claim you didn't make in your original petition. [01:53:41.900 --> 01:53:47.900] If you have a judge that doesn't, that you have reason to believe doesn't have any standing, that's separate. [01:53:47.900 --> 01:53:50.900] That doesn't go into the pleading. [01:53:50.900 --> 01:53:56.900] Then you have a move to qualify or move to... [01:53:56.900 --> 01:54:05.900] Yeah, the reason is when you throw something too hairy at them, they're like, oh, you don't have standing. [01:54:05.900 --> 01:54:07.900] All the walls go up. [01:54:07.900 --> 01:54:15.900] But once you get it in court, once you get moving along as potentially a supplemental jurisdiction, let's say it's a state issue or something like that. [01:54:15.900 --> 01:54:19.900] I want to throw in a supplemental jurisdiction issue. [01:54:19.900 --> 01:54:21.900] Once it's moving, they can't stop the train. [01:54:21.900 --> 01:54:26.900] But now I can start throwing a bunch of hobos on there on the old train and go, hey, wait a minute. [01:54:26.900 --> 01:54:29.900] What about this? What about this? [01:54:29.900 --> 01:54:39.900] If the other side files a pleading that's frivolous, you should always get a motion for sanctions first. [01:54:39.900 --> 01:54:45.900] But what I'm saying is I can't get the state or the Fed to consider that this judge is not a judge. [01:54:45.900 --> 01:54:56.900] But if I get a case moving in the federal court with an amended pleading, once I get it moving, once I get the train going, can I throw in there, oh, by the way, this judge is also not a judge. [01:54:56.900 --> 01:54:58.900] Can you adjudicate that for me? [01:54:58.900 --> 01:55:01.900] I would say you need another declaratory judgment. [01:55:01.900 --> 01:55:04.900] You're asking for a declaratory judgment on one issue. [01:55:04.900 --> 01:55:07.900] That sounds like you want to do the same for another issue. [01:55:07.900 --> 01:55:13.900] Amend your pleading and add a declaratory judgment claim with it. [01:55:13.900 --> 01:55:15.900] That's what I want, yeah. [01:55:15.900 --> 01:55:17.900] You think that'll work? [01:55:17.900 --> 01:55:18.900] Yes. [01:55:18.900 --> 01:55:23.900] There's a deadline to amend pleadings, you know. [01:55:23.900 --> 01:55:24.900] What Debra said? [01:55:24.900 --> 01:55:26.900] What's the deadline, Debra? [01:55:26.900 --> 01:55:28.900] It's different in every case. [01:55:28.900 --> 01:55:30.900] He has to look at what the deadline is to amend pleadings. [01:55:30.900 --> 01:55:32.900] I'm not on the air right now. [01:55:32.900 --> 01:55:33.900] Just tell her. [01:55:33.900 --> 01:55:34.900] Okay, Debra's not on the air. [01:55:34.900 --> 01:55:39.900] She's saying there's a federal deadline on time to amend the pleading. [01:55:39.900 --> 01:55:41.900] It's going to be set in every case. [01:55:41.900 --> 01:55:43.900] Okay, we're out of time. [01:55:43.900 --> 01:55:46.900] Randy Kelton, Fountain Rood Law Radio. [01:55:46.900 --> 01:55:48.900] Thank you all for listening.