Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:13.000]  Bad boys, what you want, what you want, what you gonna do
[00:13.000 --> 00:18.000]  When Sheriff John Brown come for you
[00:18.000 --> 00:25.000]  Tell me, what you wanna do, what you gonna do
[00:25.000 --> 00:38.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you
[00:38.000 --> 00:43.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits You go to school and learn the golden rule
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool If you get fucked then you must get cooed
[00:49.000 --> 01:00.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you
[01:00.000 --> 01:03.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one
[01:03.000 --> 01:07.000]  You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[01:07.000 --> 01:19.000]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and LulaVlo Radio on this Thursday, the 21st day of November 2024
[01:19.000 --> 01:23.000]  And I got all of that without Brett telling me any of that
[01:23.000 --> 01:26.000]  Well, I didn't tell you the year anyway
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  You always tell me the wrong year anyways, doesn't matter
[01:30.000 --> 01:32.000]  Anyway
[01:32.000 --> 01:34.000]  Well, there's that
[01:34.000 --> 01:36.000]  There is that
[01:36.000 --> 01:42.000]  Before the show we were talking about something I'm working on
[01:42.000 --> 01:48.000]  I had a sort of epiphany, of an epiphany
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.000]  I have a guy in Arizona who had these Patriot plates
[01:54.000 --> 02:00.000]  And he's sitting in a, he's at an AA meeting in a church parking lot
[02:00.000 --> 02:02.000]  He's got his car parked in a church parking lot
[02:02.000 --> 02:06.000]  And the cops see that he's sitting there with the Patriot plates on it
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000]  So they wait until he pulled out onto the street and pulled him over
[02:13.000 --> 02:21.000]  For not displaying a commercial license plate
[02:21.000 --> 02:34.000]  I have all kinds of case law that says that the public thoroughfares belong to the public
[02:34.000 --> 02:39.000]  And that they can be used for commerce
[02:39.000 --> 02:45.000]  But in order to do that, you have to sign a contract with the state
[02:46.000 --> 02:49.000]  Yeah, a business would have to get permission to use
[02:49.000 --> 02:53.000]  Business doesn't have the rights that men and women have a rights-based usage
[02:53.000 --> 02:57.000]  So business obviously has to go through the permission route
[02:57.000 --> 02:59.000]  They're saying this is a privilege
[02:59.000 --> 03:03.000]  Well, commercial use of the highways is the privilege
[03:03.000 --> 03:05.000]  Yes, exactly
[03:05.000 --> 03:10.000]  So this guy pulls out and the officer has no reason to believe
[03:10.000 --> 03:16.000]  That this person has entered into a contract with the state
[03:16.000 --> 03:24.000]  Neither does he have a reason to believe that the person is operating under a commercial contract
[03:24.000 --> 03:32.000]  Did you say that they accused him of not displaying a commercial?
[03:32.000 --> 03:34.000]  They used the word commercial?
[03:34.000 --> 03:38.000]  No, they accused him of not displaying a license plate
[03:38.000 --> 03:41.000]  Okay, but we know what the category is
[03:41.000 --> 03:44.000]  That is by definition a commercial
[03:44.000 --> 03:46.000]  Whether or not they recognize
[03:46.000 --> 03:50.000]  What they recognize? They don't recognize anything that doesn't suit their fancy
[03:50.000 --> 03:56.000]  What I'm looking for is what is the right argument to bring
[03:56.000 --> 04:03.000]  This guy didn't do anything that would authorize them to stop him
[04:03.000 --> 04:11.000]  Rather than not display a commercial contract with the state
[04:11.000 --> 04:16.000]  So they're saying that in order to use these thoroughfares
[04:16.000 --> 04:19.000]  You must be engaged in commerce
[04:19.000 --> 04:23.000]  You must agree to a commercial contract
[04:23.000 --> 04:26.000]  And I'm saying I have a right to travel
[04:26.000 --> 04:28.000]  These are my roads
[04:28.000 --> 04:30.000]  Exactly
[04:30.000 --> 04:33.000]  I'm not a business operator
[04:33.000 --> 04:39.000]  Exactly, so this may be the way to take on the issue
[04:39.000 --> 04:43.000]  I have ordered two plates
[04:43.000 --> 04:51.000]  In large red letters it says deadheading
[04:51.000 --> 04:59.000]  Every policeman knows precisely what that is
[04:59.000 --> 05:03.000]  This is not a question, this is not something that's arcane
[05:03.000 --> 05:06.000]  Maybe ordinary citizens don't know what that means
[05:06.000 --> 05:10.000]  But anybody who's a truck driver knows precisely what that means
[05:10.000 --> 05:17.000]  And that term is specifically for the Department of Public Safety
[05:17.000 --> 05:24.000]  It defines a period of time when a commercial driver
[05:24.000 --> 05:31.000]  Is driving his vehicle from one location to another location
[05:31.000 --> 05:37.000]  To where he is not being paid commercially to operate the vehicle
[05:37.000 --> 05:39.000]  In between loads
[05:39.000 --> 05:42.000]  Where he's dropped a load off at one warehouse
[05:42.000 --> 05:46.000]  And to get another load he's got to drive this other warehouse
[05:46.000 --> 05:48.000]  Sometimes it's 100 miles away
[05:48.000 --> 05:51.000]  He's not being paid here at that time
[05:51.000 --> 05:55.000]  He may bill enough to this other client to cover that
[05:55.000 --> 05:59.000]  But he's not being paid for that time
[05:59.000 --> 06:01.000]  That's called deadheading
[06:01.000 --> 06:05.000]  And in that time he's not in commerce
[06:05.000 --> 06:13.000]  Every DPS officer absolutely knows precisely what that means
[06:13.000 --> 06:17.000]  So I'm deadheading
[06:18.000 --> 06:22.000]  They have to know exactly what that means
[06:22.000 --> 06:26.000]  I'm not putting a knot for hire or all that other crap
[06:26.000 --> 06:28.000]  I've just been deadheading, that's telling them
[06:28.000 --> 06:31.000]  I do have commercial license plates
[06:31.000 --> 06:34.000]  I'm going to take these plates I've ordered
[06:34.000 --> 06:38.000]  And I'm going to attach them to the back of the license plate
[06:38.000 --> 06:41.000]  Are you going to do that wingnut thing?
[06:41.000 --> 06:46.000]  Yeah, I bought these little clips that they use like for tonneau covers
[06:46.000 --> 06:50.000]  They're marine clips like if you have a tarp on a boat
[06:50.000 --> 06:54.000]  You stretch it down and you turn this thing, slide this
[06:54.000 --> 06:58.000]  It's got a metal grommet with a hole in it
[06:58.000 --> 07:01.000]  You slide it over the little clip, you turn it 90 degrees
[07:01.000 --> 07:04.000]  So I'm going to take my plates off
[07:04.000 --> 07:06.000]  Put these two things on there
[07:06.000 --> 07:09.000]  Attach these two plates together
[07:09.000 --> 07:14.000]  Turn the plate around so that the license plate is facing in
[07:14.000 --> 07:19.000]  And the deadheading side is facing out
[07:19.000 --> 07:22.000]  It's a current license plate
[07:22.000 --> 07:28.000]  And I have current registrations on that license plate
[07:28.000 --> 07:31.000]  But I'm not displaying it
[07:31.000 --> 07:38.000]  Just like when the officer pulled me over in Austin and I gave him an ID
[07:38.000 --> 07:43.000]  Back then you could have an ID and a driver's license
[07:43.000 --> 07:46.000]  And they looked exactly alike
[07:46.000 --> 07:52.000]  Except the driver's license started with DL and the ID started with ID
[07:52.000 --> 07:55.000]  Well, the officer took it and went back to his car
[07:55.000 --> 07:58.000]  Came back and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, this is a Texas ID
[07:58.000 --> 08:00.000]  I said, yes, sir, it is
[08:00.000 --> 08:03.000]  Do you have a driver's license? Yes, I do
[08:03.000 --> 08:06.000]  But I'm not using it right now
[08:06.000 --> 08:09.000]  That's the point
[08:10.000 --> 08:14.000]  I have a contract with the state
[08:14.000 --> 08:19.000]  I can operate in commerce if I want to
[08:19.000 --> 08:27.000]  And I can even use this vehicle to operate in commerce if I want to
[08:27.000 --> 08:35.000]  But at this time I am advertising that I am not operating in commerce
[08:35.000 --> 08:40.000]  So he can't charge me with not entering into this contract
[08:40.000 --> 08:44.000]  He can't charge me with not having a current registration
[08:44.000 --> 08:55.000]  He can only charge me with using the public highways for public purposes
[08:55.000 --> 08:59.000]  Good luck with that
[08:59.000 --> 09:02.000]  Let's see how they fight that one
[09:02.000 --> 09:06.000]  That's not all I got. I got another one
[09:06.000 --> 09:12.000]  I just went to a city hall
[09:12.000 --> 09:15.000]  A friend of mine got a ticket
[09:15.000 --> 09:18.000]  And I went with him
[09:18.000 --> 09:24.000]  This was the Rome city hall where I had had a couple tickets
[09:24.000 --> 09:28.000]  And the week before I went to a city council meeting
[09:28.000 --> 09:32.000]  And gave some criminal complaints to the mayor
[09:32.000 --> 09:39.000]  And told the mayor that I expect him to do with that
[09:39.000 --> 09:46.000]  I told him that I had given you these complaints in your capacity as a magistrate in the state of Texas
[09:46.000 --> 09:48.000]  And I quoted him the statute
[09:48.000 --> 09:52.000]  And I said, now your lawyer over here, and they had the city attorney set next to him
[09:52.000 --> 09:57.000]  Is going to give you some song and dance and seltzer down your pants
[09:57.000 --> 10:08.000]  But at the end of the day I will expect you to do exactly what 15.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure commands you to do
[10:08.000 --> 10:14.000]  You need to understand that I did this to the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme
[10:14.000 --> 10:20.000]  And he did not do what the code specifically commanded him to do
[10:20.000 --> 10:25.000]  So I sued him for $20 million in the federal court in his personal capacity
[10:25.000 --> 10:27.000]  So be cautious
[10:27.000 --> 10:29.000]  Do what the law commands you to do
[10:29.000 --> 10:31.000]  Your three minutes is up
[10:31.000 --> 10:33.000]  Okay, so my three minutes is up
[10:33.000 --> 10:35.000]  I go to this hearing
[10:35.000 --> 10:38.000]  It's the first appearance on a ticket
[10:38.000 --> 10:40.000]  And they got this
[10:40.000 --> 10:43.000]  They rearranged the courtroom
[10:43.000 --> 10:45.000]  And they got this female
[10:45.000 --> 10:47.000]  I didn't notice she was in a black robe
[10:47.000 --> 10:49.000]  I just thought she's in a black outfit
[10:49.000 --> 10:51.000]  She's talking to this guy
[10:51.000 --> 10:53.000]  And the clerk is sitting next to him
[10:53.000 --> 10:55.000]  The guy gets down and he leaves
[10:55.000 --> 10:59.000]  And I went up and spoke to the clerk
[10:59.000 --> 11:05.000]  And I said that I needed, I'm going to want a copy of the recording of this hearing
[11:05.000 --> 11:09.000]  She said, we're not recording this hearing
[11:09.000 --> 11:11.000]  What?
[11:11.000 --> 11:13.000]  You have to record this hearing
[11:13.000 --> 11:15.000]  And it turned out to be the judge
[11:15.000 --> 11:19.000]  The judge said, well, this is just a show cause hearing
[11:19.000 --> 11:23.000]  What's wrong with that picture, Brett?
[11:23.000 --> 11:25.000]  It has to be recorded
[11:25.000 --> 11:29.000]  They have to collect up all the evidence that they obtain
[11:29.000 --> 11:35.000]  What does 28.01 say about the hearings that can be had
[11:35.000 --> 11:43.000]  That a judge is authorized to order a person to come to court for?
[11:43.000 --> 11:53.000]  Well, one would be a conference with the prosecutor for the judge to watch
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.000]  For what purpose?
[11:55.000 --> 11:59.000]  They can't just call you to confer with the prosecutor
[11:59.000 --> 12:07.000]  It says they can call you to confer with the prosecutor for the following reasons
[12:07.000 --> 12:11.000]  Well, I'm not even sure, that question even feels premature
[12:11.000 --> 12:15.000]  Because there has to be a case existing
[12:15.000 --> 12:19.000]  Somebody has to bring a piece of paper to the court
[12:19.000 --> 12:21.000]  He's there on a summons
[12:21.000 --> 12:23.000]  Okay, but then that wouldn't be a court
[12:23.000 --> 12:25.000]  It would be a magistrate
[12:25.000 --> 12:29.000]  It wouldn't be 28.01 court activities
[12:29.000 --> 12:35.000]  It would be 16.01 during 211
[12:35.000 --> 12:39.000]  They would be doing something that determines probable cause
[12:39.000 --> 12:43.000]  543.006
[12:43.000 --> 12:47.000]  Yeah, that's the way you get to it from transportation code
[12:47.000 --> 12:51.000]  The officer can, if he stops you for a violation
[12:51.000 --> 12:53.000]  He can release you on your own recognizance
[12:53.000 --> 12:59.000]  If you sign this promise to appear before a magistrate of the county
[12:59.000 --> 13:03.000]  So he appeared before a magistrate of the county
[13:03.000 --> 13:07.000]  And the magistrate is holding a show cause hearing
[13:07.000 --> 13:11.000]  We can't show a show cause hearing as far as I can tell
[13:11.000 --> 13:13.000]  In a criminal prosecution
[13:13.000 --> 13:17.000]  It's not in the code of criminal procedure
[13:17.000 --> 13:21.000]  The only thing you can have someone come to court for
[13:21.000 --> 13:25.000]  To meet with the prosecutor
[13:25.000 --> 13:29.000]  Is examining trial
[13:29.000 --> 13:33.000]  At arraignment, which you can't hold in a class C misdemeanor
[13:33.000 --> 13:37.000]  Or there are about 8 or 10 other 11 things I think
[13:37.000 --> 13:39.000]  And they're all motions of pleadings
[13:39.000 --> 13:43.000]  I don't read that the same way about the arraignment
[13:43.000 --> 13:47.000]  Yeah, it does give a list of the things and that's certainly not one of them
[13:47.000 --> 13:53.000]  And a show cause hearing is not an arraignment
[13:53.000 --> 13:55.000]  Exactly
[13:55.000 --> 13:57.000]  This was a let's make a deal hearing
[13:57.000 --> 13:59.000]  So I'm saying I want to see it
[13:59.000 --> 14:01.000]  I want to record it
[14:01.000 --> 14:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[14:05.000 --> 14:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method
[14:09.000 --> 14:13.000]  The Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[14:13.000 --> 14:15.000]  And now you can win two
[14:15.000 --> 14:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[14:19.000 --> 14:21.000]  Using federal civil rights statutes
[14:21.000 --> 14:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[14:25.000 --> 14:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[14:27.000 --> 14:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[14:29.000 --> 14:33.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[14:33.000 --> 14:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[14:38.000 --> 14:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[14:40.000 --> 14:44.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[14:44.000 --> 14:46.000]  And click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[14:46.000 --> 14:49.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[14:49.000 --> 14:51.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[14:51.000 --> 14:57.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[14:57.000 --> 15:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[15:00.000 --> 15:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[15:06.000 --> 15:12.000]  Then tune in to logosradio.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for scripture talk
[15:12.000 --> 15:17.000]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15
[15:17.000 --> 15:24.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth
[15:24.000 --> 15:28.000]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the book of Mark
[15:28.000 --> 15:32.000]  Where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message
[15:32.000 --> 15:39.000]  Our 2nd hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[15:39.000 --> 15:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[15:44.000 --> 15:50.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[15:50.000 --> 15:56.000]  So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradio.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[15:56.000 --> 16:00.000]  To inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures
[16:02.000 --> 16:05.000]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[16:05.000 --> 16:09.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:32.000 --> 16:36.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:36.000 --> 16:40.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:40.000 --> 16:44.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:44.000 --> 16:48.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:48.000 --> 16:52.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:52.000 --> 16:56.000]  Logosradio.com
[16:56.000 --> 17:00.000]  Logosradio.com
[17:00.000 --> 17:04.000]  People have been fighting this right to travel for a long time
[17:04.000 --> 17:08.000]  And I'm trying to find the right question to bring
[17:08.000 --> 17:14.000]  The right to travel is historic
[17:14.000 --> 17:24.000]  And ever since we've had any kind of civilization
[17:24.000 --> 17:28.000]  In order for the civilization to function and flourish
[17:28.000 --> 17:33.000]  People had to have access to thoroughfares
[17:33.000 --> 17:39.000]  Since we gathered together in cities and large groups
[17:39.000 --> 17:46.000]  We built roads and thoroughfares and in order for the population to function effectively
[17:46.000 --> 17:52.000]  Those roads and thoroughfares had to be publicly available to everybody
[17:52.000 --> 17:55.000]  They always have been
[17:55.000 --> 17:58.000]  Except for now
[17:58.000 --> 18:05.000]  Now they're only available if you enter into a commercial contract with the state
[18:05.000 --> 18:10.000]  Our case law still affirms
[18:10.000 --> 18:14.000]  Every single circuit in the country
[18:14.000 --> 18:17.000]  The federal circuit has affirmed repeatedly
[18:17.000 --> 18:22.000]  That the public have a right to travel freely on the roads and highways
[18:22.000 --> 18:25.000]  That goes without question
[18:25.000 --> 18:31.000]  So now they're saying yes, you can travel freely on the roads and highways
[18:31.000 --> 18:37.000]  So long as you first enter into a written contract with the state
[18:37.000 --> 18:40.000]  Or you agree to certain restrictions
[18:40.000 --> 18:43.000]  Yeah, trade your right for a privilege, will you?
[18:43.000 --> 18:46.000]  Yeah, and they're calling it a privilege
[18:46.000 --> 18:48.000]  And so how do I get to it?
[18:48.000 --> 18:50.000]  So I'm going to try to
[18:50.000 --> 18:54.000]  I'm going to be entered into the contract
[18:54.000 --> 18:59.000]  So they can't accuse me of not being registered
[18:59.000 --> 19:05.000]  They can only accuse me of not displaying the registration
[19:05.000 --> 19:13.000]  But I'm using the public highways for personal use
[19:13.000 --> 19:16.000]  So I'm not using that license right now
[19:16.000 --> 19:19.000]  I'm a pilot's license
[19:19.000 --> 19:24.000]  But I haven't had a pilot's license in my hand for 40 years
[19:24.000 --> 19:26.000]  I can go to the VA and get one
[19:26.000 --> 19:27.000]  I still got it down there
[19:27.000 --> 19:29.000]  And pilot's license never expired
[19:29.000 --> 19:31.000]  Once you got one, you got one
[19:31.000 --> 19:35.000]  No one asked me for my pilot's license
[19:35.000 --> 19:39.000]  I mean, maybe if I landed an airplane in an airport
[19:39.000 --> 19:41.000]  And did something really stupid
[19:41.000 --> 19:43.000]  All the time I flew airplanes
[19:43.000 --> 19:45.000]  Nobody ever asked me to see that license
[19:45.000 --> 19:49.000]  But if I'd have gotten an accident or something
[19:49.000 --> 19:53.000]  Then I would have had to have had it
[19:53.000 --> 19:57.000]  But only if I wrecked an airplane
[19:57.000 --> 20:02.000]  So I could still move around the country freely without that license
[20:02.000 --> 20:05.000]  Well, I've got a driver's license
[20:05.000 --> 20:08.000]  Well, couldn't you do that in an airplane as well?
[20:08.000 --> 20:10.000]  Yes
[20:10.000 --> 20:13.000]  As long as you're not doing the commercial transportation in an airplane
[20:13.000 --> 20:16.000]  Airplanes don't have license plates on them
[20:16.000 --> 20:18.000]  They have a tail number
[20:18.000 --> 20:22.000]  Tail number is just for identification
[20:22.000 --> 20:24.000]  Well, it's the same thing, right?
[20:24.000 --> 20:26.000]  No
[20:26.000 --> 20:29.000]  You've got a license
[20:29.000 --> 20:33.000]  No, the tail number goes to the airplane, not to the pilot
[20:33.000 --> 20:37.000]  I'm not saying that whether it's affixed or painted
[20:37.000 --> 20:42.000]  I'm saying that the issue is that they are giving you permission to do something
[20:42.000 --> 20:44.000]  You already have a right to do
[20:44.000 --> 20:48.000]  There's no historical right to fly
[20:48.000 --> 20:49.000]  What do you mean?
[20:49.000 --> 20:51.000]  In the conveyance of the day?
[20:51.000 --> 20:55.000]  Yeah, that's an issue I could probably take on
[20:55.000 --> 20:57.000]  But it's not the one I want to fight right now
[20:57.000 --> 20:59.000]  My point is I've got this other license
[20:59.000 --> 21:04.000]  And nobody's asking me for it because I'm not using it
[21:04.000 --> 21:09.000]  Now, I pull out on a public highway
[21:09.000 --> 21:11.000]  Using it for personal use
[21:11.000 --> 21:14.000]  And now they're asking me for my commercial license
[21:14.000 --> 21:16.000]  That's like asking me for my pilot's license
[21:16.000 --> 21:20.000]  I'm not using either one of them
[21:20.000 --> 21:24.000]  So I'm using the highways for private use
[21:24.000 --> 21:29.000]  I'm not advertising that I'm a commercial driver
[21:29.000 --> 21:33.000]  If I put those plates on there, I'm advertising that I'm in commerce
[21:33.000 --> 21:35.000]  And I'm not advertising it
[21:35.000 --> 21:38.000]  So they don't have reason to believe that I'm in commerce
[21:38.000 --> 21:42.000]  If I had plates showing, they would have reason to believe that I'm in commerce
[21:42.000 --> 21:49.000]  Once they stop me, then because I could operate this commercial vehicle in a non-commercial way
[21:49.000 --> 21:54.000]  Then they would have to determine whether or not I was using it in commerce
[21:54.000 --> 21:59.000]  But I'm not advertising commerce
[21:59.000 --> 22:05.000]  So they have no reason to believe that I'm in commerce in the first place
[22:06.000 --> 22:11.000]  They're poor trains, as anything that has wheels is fair game
[22:11.000 --> 22:13.000]  Yeah, that's what they're saying
[22:13.000 --> 22:23.000]  And I'm saying what that does is converts the highways from public to commercial use only
[22:23.000 --> 22:34.000]  I can't use those highways and roadways unless I first enter into a commercial contract with the state
[22:34.000 --> 22:39.000]  So that makes the highways no longer public
[22:39.000 --> 22:45.000]  And the commercial use of the highways is a privilege
[22:45.000 --> 22:48.000]  That's where you get this privilege nonsense
[22:48.000 --> 22:56.000]  So I'm going to ask them to take me on with no knowledge that I am in commerce
[22:56.000 --> 23:00.000]  No reason to believe I'm in commerce
[23:01.000 --> 23:06.000]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it
[23:06.000 --> 23:12.000]  So you're going to have tags that say deadheading
[23:12.000 --> 23:20.000]  And when the officer wants to accuse you of a ride ticket and say that you
[23:20.000 --> 23:29.000]  He's going to be looking at probably Texas transportation code 502.473
[23:29.000 --> 23:34.000]  Operation of vehicle without registration insignia
[23:34.000 --> 23:41.000]  A person commits an offense if the person operates on a public highway during a registration period
[23:41.000 --> 23:48.000]  A motor vehicle that does not properly display the registration insignia issued by the department
[23:48.000 --> 23:55.000]  That establishes that the license plates have been validated for the period
[23:55.000 --> 23:58.000]  So they're going to want to call that a crime
[23:58.000 --> 24:06.000]  I get it and I'm going to say that particular provision of law is unconstitutional on its face
[24:08.000 --> 24:14.000]  And the municipal judge or the JP is going to say consta what
[24:14.000 --> 24:19.000]  I'm going to say Mr. Bailiff arrest that judge
[24:19.000 --> 24:24.000]  And the bailiff is going to refuse and I'm going to pull out my criminal complaint
[24:24.000 --> 24:28.000]  Based on that and I'm going to file it with another magistrate
[24:28.000 --> 24:35.000]  And ask the magistrate to issue a warrant against the traffic court judge and the bailiff
[24:35.000 --> 24:39.000]  And the magistrates going to refuse
[24:39.000 --> 24:44.000]  And I'm going to take the lawsuit I just finished today
[24:44.000 --> 24:51.000]  I'm going to go down to a JP court and I'm going to file suit against the judge and the bailiff
[24:51.000 --> 24:55.000]  In their personal capacity
[24:55.000 --> 25:00.000]  For $20,000 or $19,000 apiece
[25:00.000 --> 25:05.000]  That's dance bubba
[25:05.000 --> 25:10.000]  Get your behind down here and explain to this court
[25:10.000 --> 25:16.000]  Why you didn't issue that warrant the way the law specifically commanded you to do
[25:16.000 --> 25:24.000]  And why you Mr. Bailiff didn't arrest that judge the way 14.06 commanded you to do
[25:24.000 --> 25:28.000]  The stats guys
[25:28.000 --> 25:33.000]  And then they're going to get a city attorney to answer for
[25:33.000 --> 25:38.000]  And I'm going to wait until the 21 days are up
[25:38.000 --> 25:42.000]  And then I'm going to file a motion to strike
[25:42.000 --> 25:48.000]  Claiming that the prosecutor, the city attorney
[25:48.000 --> 25:53.000]  Acting as counsel with these two individuals amounted to a public emolument
[25:53.000 --> 25:57.000]  That's forbidden by Article 5 Section 53
[25:57.000 --> 26:01.000]  Texas Constitution
[26:01.000 --> 26:03.000]  So strike it
[26:03.000 --> 26:07.000]  And then I'm going to move to strike the pleading
[26:07.000 --> 26:11.000]  And then I'll move for default judgment
[26:11.000 --> 26:15.000]  Yeah because 21 days went by and this guy piped up
[26:15.000 --> 26:19.000]  He's not allowed to and then nobody else that is authorized ever piped up
[26:19.000 --> 26:22.000]  So there's not been an answer
[26:22.000 --> 26:25.000]  Oh is this going to be fun or not what
[26:25.000 --> 26:33.000]  And I have that complaint written in a generic template format
[26:33.000 --> 26:37.000]  That's going in my ticket site
[26:37.000 --> 26:41.000]  So as the ticket site develops we'll get to that point
[26:41.000 --> 26:45.000]  Did you file a complaint with the magistrate against this officer
[26:45.000 --> 26:48.000]  Whoever did the magistrate issue a warrant
[26:48.000 --> 26:52.000]  No boom it'll spit out this lawsuit
[26:52.000 --> 26:56.000]  While you do sign it
[26:56.000 --> 26:58.000]  I think we can take our system back
[26:58.000 --> 27:01.000]  Hang on we'll be right back
[27:01.000 --> 27:04.000]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information
[27:04.000 --> 27:06.000]  And you may trust them to keep it safe
[27:06.000 --> 27:11.000]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets
[27:11.000 --> 27:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details
[27:15.000 --> 27:17.000]  Privacy is under attack
[27:17.000 --> 27:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[27:20.000 --> 27:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[27:25.000 --> 27:27.000]  So protect your rights
[27:27.000 --> 27:30.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[27:30.000 --> 27:33.000]  Privacy it's worth hanging on to
[27:33.000 --> 27:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[27:37.000 --> 27:41.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[27:41.000 --> 27:44.000]  Start over with Startpage
[27:44.000 --> 27:46.000]  Data privacy is a big deal
[27:46.000 --> 27:51.000]  So nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information
[27:51.000 --> 27:54.000]  But what happens if it escapes their control
[27:54.000 --> 27:55.000]  It's not an idle question
[27:55.000 --> 27:57.000]  According to a recent survey
[27:57.000 --> 28:03.000]  A shocking 90% of US companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year
[28:03.000 --> 28:07.000]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to Startpage.com
[28:07.000 --> 28:11.000]  Unlike other search engines, Startpage doesn't store any data on you
[28:11.000 --> 28:14.000]  They've never been hacked but even if they were
[28:14.000 --> 28:16.000]  There would be nothing for criminals to see
[28:16.000 --> 28:18.000]  The cupboard would be bare
[28:18.000 --> 28:21.000]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way
[28:21.000 --> 28:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[28:23.000 --> 28:26.000]  For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[28:53.000 --> 28:56.000]  Justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son
[28:56.000 --> 28:58.000]  Go to buildingwatt.org
[28:58.000 --> 29:01.000]  Why it fell, why it matters and what you can do
[29:01.000 --> 29:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar
[29:05.000 --> 29:08.000]  In today's America we live in an us against them society
[29:08.000 --> 29:10.000]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[29:10.000 --> 29:13.000]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[29:13.000 --> 29:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[29:16.000 --> 29:18.000]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly
[29:18.000 --> 29:20.000]  The right to due process of law
[29:20.000 --> 29:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[29:23.000 --> 29:26.000]  How to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[29:26.000 --> 29:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[29:29.000 --> 29:31.000]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[29:31.000 --> 29:34.000]  That will help you understand what due process is
[29:34.000 --> 29:36.000]  And how to hold courts to the rule of law
[29:36.000 --> 29:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[29:38.000 --> 29:41.000]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[29:41.000 --> 29:43.000]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[29:43.000 --> 29:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[29:46.000 --> 29:48.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[29:48.000 --> 29:51.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[29:53.000 --> 29:55.000]  From ruleoflawradio.com
[29:55.000 --> 29:57.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have
[29:57.000 --> 29:59.000]  The free society we all want and deserve
[30:03.000 --> 30:07.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:22.000 --> 30:26.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:26.000 --> 30:30.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:30.000 --> 30:34.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:34.000 --> 30:38.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[30:46.000 --> 30:51.000]  When you gonna stop abuse your power
[30:51.000 --> 30:57.000]  When you gonna stop abuse your power
[30:57.000 --> 31:02.000]  So please Mr. McClan teach officers not to abuse their power
[31:02.000 --> 31:08.000]  Send a request to the leader, the captain of all officers
[31:08.000 --> 31:13.000]  Tell them to uphold the law and please don't abuse their power
[31:13.000 --> 31:18.000]  They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour
[31:18.000 --> 31:24.000]  So Mr. Officer, please stop abusing your power
[31:24.000 --> 31:29.000]  You pull me over and tell me to be silent sir
[31:29.000 --> 31:35.000]  I need to speak to my lawyer, Mr. Officer
[31:35.000 --> 31:40.000]  You acting like you're the judge, finding me guilty sir
[31:40.000 --> 31:45.000]  So when you gonna stop abuse your power
[31:45.000 --> 31:51.000]  When you gonna stop abuse your power
[31:51.000 --> 31:57.000]  When you gonna stop abuse your power
[31:57.000 --> 32:02.000]  When you gonna stop abuse your power
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Mr. Officer abusing his power
[32:06.000 --> 32:06.860]  Okay.
[32:07.860 --> 32:15.260]  On the break, Brett was talking about something on the issue of when they
[32:15.260 --> 32:18.780]  stopped me solely for not displaying.
[32:20.240 --> 32:20.560]  Go ahead.
[32:20.600 --> 32:20.880]  Yeah.
[32:22.080 --> 32:29.200]  I think this is a, this is a good, relatively cheap, I think, way to, to
[32:29.200 --> 32:35.800]  deal with this, inexpensive, I should say, because we, I can accuse you
[32:35.800 --> 32:42.000]  of not displaying this registration thing, but it also says that's in
[32:42.000 --> 32:49.680]  subsection A, subsection D says that a court may dismiss a charge brought
[32:49.680 --> 32:54.520]  under subsection A if the defendant pays a reimbursement fee, not to
[32:54.520 --> 33:02.240]  exceed 10 bucks and shows that the, the motor vehicle was issued a
[33:02.280 --> 33:06.920]  registration insignia by the department that was attached to the motor vehicle.
[33:07.840 --> 33:08.240]  So,
[33:13.320 --> 33:16.980]  you know, first, what came to my mind is that it could be attached and
[33:16.980 --> 33:20.960]  not displayed like you could have it in clip to your visor, but what you're
[33:20.960 --> 33:25.000]  describing is actually even probably more fun because you, you've got it.
[33:25.000 --> 33:29.880]  You're, you're going to have it on the place where it would normally be displayed.
[33:30.000 --> 33:34.960]  It has to be so far from the pavement and there are, you can't put it in your,
[33:34.960 --> 33:38.640]  in your dash because there are, no, but none of that is on there.
[33:39.000 --> 33:42.680]  This is, this is just saying it can be dismissed if it's attached.
[33:46.520 --> 33:50.240]  They can still come back and complain about how many inches it away is.
[33:50.240 --> 33:52.120]  And so then it's not properly displayed.
[33:52.360 --> 33:56.520]  That will be another round, obviously, but as long as it's attached, you
[33:56.520 --> 33:58.320]  can get it dismissed for 10 bucks.
[34:00.200 --> 34:00.440]  Okay.
[34:00.440 --> 34:00.920]  Okay.
[34:01.320 --> 34:07.240]  I got one, I got a, no proof of insurance ticket once, but I had
[34:07.240 --> 34:08.800]  insurance, I didn't have proof with me.
[34:09.560 --> 34:14.120]  Ah, and over there in subsection D where they're not allowed to enforce.
[34:16.320 --> 34:17.960]  And that's the way this was.
[34:17.960 --> 34:21.960]  And, and when I come in, they said, did you have insurance?
[34:21.960 --> 34:22.960]  Of course I had insurance.
[34:23.720 --> 34:27.000]  Well, if you'll just pay $10, we can dismiss it.
[34:27.000 --> 34:27.520]  I said, no.
[34:27.520 --> 34:29.800]  What do you mean no, then we can't dismiss it.
[34:29.800 --> 34:33.240]  If you don't pay us $10, I know, I want a jury trial.
[34:34.960 --> 34:36.120]  This clerk knew me.
[34:36.120 --> 34:36.720]  Oh, Mr.
[34:36.720 --> 34:40.840]  Kelton, the, the, the judge, her name was Mary Motsenbacher.
[34:41.320 --> 34:42.240]  She heard it.
[34:43.080 --> 34:44.200]  She come out, Mr.
[34:44.200 --> 34:46.560]  Kelton, what are you doing now?
[34:47.200 --> 34:50.080]  And they said, well, your honor, he, he's got proof of
[34:50.080 --> 34:51.880]  insurance, but he won't show it to us.
[34:53.480 --> 34:55.800]  She said, well, you know, I'm not going to show it to you.
[34:56.200 --> 34:59.760]  She said, you have proof of insurance?
[34:59.800 --> 35:00.400]  Yeah.
[35:01.080 --> 35:02.960]  All you do show it to them and they'll dismiss.
[35:02.960 --> 35:06.840]  Yeah, but they want to charge me 10 bucks and I'm not guilty.
[35:07.760 --> 35:09.080]  She said, well, we have to.
[35:09.560 --> 35:10.360]  I said, okay.
[35:10.360 --> 35:12.080]  So I want a jury trial.
[35:12.800 --> 35:15.040]  So we get a jury and I show it to the jury.
[35:15.280 --> 35:17.720]  The jury will find me not guilty and I don't have to pay anything.
[35:18.880 --> 35:21.440]  She told the clerk, just dismiss it, just dismiss it.
[35:24.000 --> 35:25.560]  So this kind of goes to that.
[35:26.680 --> 35:27.960]  So this is perfect.
[35:29.760 --> 35:32.800]  But then again, that statute is still problematic.
[35:34.560 --> 35:42.440]  I have to prove that when I was using the public highways, that I was under
[35:42.440 --> 35:47.560]  a commercial contract to do so, making my use of the highways a privilege.
[35:47.560 --> 35:52.280]  It is problematic in that way, but actually for that matter, all of
[35:52.320 --> 35:56.000]  Texas transportation code is equally problematic.
[35:56.520 --> 35:57.320]  Absolutely.
[35:59.000 --> 36:02.680]  Unless I'm using the road for hire.
[36:04.960 --> 36:11.880]  There's ample code, ample case law in every federal circuit that
[36:11.880 --> 36:17.960]  establishes that the roadways belong to the public and that the public
[36:17.960 --> 36:19.960]  has a right to freely use them.
[36:23.240 --> 36:24.160]  Every state has it.
[36:24.400 --> 36:27.240]  When I look for that, I get stacks of case law on that.
[36:29.440 --> 36:35.880]  So how is it that while I have this right to freely use the highways, I can
[36:35.880 --> 36:43.320]  only exercise that right if I convert it into a privilege by entering into
[36:43.320 --> 36:50.440]  a contract with the state, and I can only access and use those highways
[36:50.720 --> 36:56.120]  while acting under the covenants of that commercial contract.
[37:00.080 --> 37:07.120]  I've wondered, why is it that most every state, not Arizona, Arizona's
[37:08.240 --> 37:13.600]  traffic laws are codified into state code, into the general laws.
[37:13.640 --> 37:16.200]  They're not into a special commercial code.
[37:17.040 --> 37:23.000]  But most every other state has passed their laws into a commercial
[37:23.000 --> 37:27.320]  code, as opposed to the general laws.
[37:28.120 --> 37:32.320]  Now, there are a couple of things in there that are in the general laws.
[37:32.320 --> 37:41.240]  If you are stopped for speeding in excess of 20 miles above a posted speed limit,
[37:42.600 --> 37:45.360]  then that is a class B misdemeanor.
[37:47.200 --> 37:56.680]  But then again, only if you're doing so in commerce, because the speed
[37:56.680 --> 38:00.440]  limit signs only apply to commercial traffic.
[38:02.360 --> 38:09.400]  So why did they pass these into a commercial code instead of the general laws?
[38:10.280 --> 38:17.080]  Maybe because it would restrict our right to free use of the roadways.
[38:17.280 --> 38:24.840]  That has been a right of the people in every country on the planet for
[38:24.840 --> 38:26.920]  the last 6,000 years we know of.
[38:29.800 --> 38:34.800]  No country could thrive without free public use of the highways.
[38:34.840 --> 38:37.120]  No civilization could thrive without the highways.
[38:38.960 --> 38:46.200]  And then those highways had to be freely accessible by everybody for
[38:46.200 --> 38:54.240]  millennium, and all of a sudden now, in the last 70 years, 80 years, that's
[38:54.240 --> 38:55.280]  no longer the case.
[38:55.280 --> 39:01.640]  Now you can only use them if you're into a government, a contractual
[39:02.040 --> 39:02.240]  government.
[39:02.240 --> 39:04.080]  I think we can win that one, Brett.
[39:05.440 --> 39:06.720]  Well, I certainly hope so.
[39:07.360 --> 39:09.240]  Get all the law and the facts on your side.
[39:09.240 --> 39:12.080]  It sounds like you're getting the politics on your side.
[39:14.360 --> 39:18.960]  That's what my, I think the way to get the politics on our side, at least to
[39:18.960 --> 39:24.320]  get them to pay attention to it, is this thing of us going back after them.
[39:24.520 --> 39:31.280]  You step half inch across the legal line, I'm going to sue you in the JP
[39:31.280 --> 39:36.840]  court, in your personal capacity, and it's only going to cost me 60 bucks
[39:37.040 --> 39:43.280]  instead of 500 bucks for the ticket and then another 500 a year for the next
[39:43.280 --> 39:45.320]  five years on my insurance.
[39:46.480 --> 39:51.320]  So I'm going to sue you, and I'm going to sue you, and I'm going to sue you
[39:51.360 --> 39:53.560]  for the next five years on my insurance.
[39:59.440 --> 40:01.520]  That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
[40:02.080 --> 40:04.320]  Come back, do you have something you want to talk about, Brett?
[40:05.440 --> 40:08.120]  No, I'm ready to go ahead and I see we've got a couple of callers here.
[40:08.640 --> 40:09.600]  Yeah, we do.
[40:11.080 --> 40:14.160]  So when we come back on the other side, we'll go to our callers.
[40:14.680 --> 40:18.840]  We have Alex in California and Ted in California.
[40:19.520 --> 40:21.240]  We're stuck on Californians tonight.
[40:21.680 --> 40:27.520]  And both of y'all, I'd like to know anything you're sensing in California
[40:28.200 --> 40:33.520]  relative to the politics of the latest election.
[40:36.400 --> 40:41.480]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Life Radio, call in number.
[40:41.560 --> 40:43.840]  We've got two open spaces on the board.
[40:44.160 --> 40:48.600]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[40:49.960 --> 40:50.760]  We'll be right back.
[40:51.320 --> 41:03.200]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:03.280 --> 41:07.160]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:07.160 --> 41:11.080]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:11.360 --> 41:16.440]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[41:16.440 --> 41:18.520]  by lowering the claims cost?
[41:18.560 --> 41:24.120]  The CHANT Plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[41:24.160 --> 41:29.360]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care,
[41:29.400 --> 41:33.280]  and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay.
[41:33.320 --> 41:39.360]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less than FICA taxes.
[41:39.360 --> 41:45.600]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[41:45.640 --> 41:51.880]  The CHANT Plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[41:51.920 --> 41:59.960]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[42:01.080 --> 42:03.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:04.160 --> 42:08.400]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable,
[42:08.440 --> 42:14.920]  easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[42:15.600 --> 42:19.320]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[42:19.320 --> 42:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[42:23.200 --> 42:28.040]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[42:28.040 --> 42:34.600]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[42:34.600 --> 42:39.080]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[42:39.080 --> 42:43.520]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[42:43.520 --> 42:49.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[42:49.680 --> 42:52.240]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[42:52.240 --> 43:00.480]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[43:14.480 --> 43:20.320]  If you did not have any problem, where are you going to look for one?
[43:20.320 --> 43:26.080]  If you could not wait any battle too long, would your process be done?
[43:26.080 --> 43:32.080]  Such a sentiment, a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling to keep the peace.
[43:32.080 --> 43:39.680]  All it takes is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police for watching the spotlight.
[43:39.680 --> 43:46.160]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[43:46.160 --> 43:49.840]  And I got distracted on part of my story. I was in the courtroom.
[43:51.680 --> 43:57.440]  Last week, I went to the city council meeting and gave criminal charges to the mayor
[43:58.560 --> 44:01.680]  against the municipal judge and the chief of police.
[44:02.480 --> 44:08.880]  Now, was this a special mayor or was he one of the normal ones that doesn't even realize he's a magistrate?
[44:08.880 --> 44:12.160]  He's a normal mayor that doesn't realize he's a magistrate.
[44:13.520 --> 44:20.320]  But I instructed him that under Article 2.09, who are magistrates?
[44:21.440 --> 44:25.920]  Justices of the Supreme Court, judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
[44:25.920 --> 44:31.760]  district judges, county judges, justices of the peace, and municipal judges, which is your...
[44:32.480 --> 44:34.000]  And mayors.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.760]  And I'm sorry, municipal judges and mayors, which is you.
[44:41.360 --> 44:43.840]  I didn't go to the reporters because it's too arcane.
[44:44.480 --> 44:50.640]  And I said, your attorney over here is going to give you a bunch of song and dance and seltzer
[44:50.640 --> 44:56.720]  down your pants, but I'm going to hold you precisely to Article 15.09, Texas Code of
[44:56.800 --> 44:57.840]  Criminal Procedure.
[44:57.840 --> 45:07.200]  And my complaint against the judge was that he didn't act on criminal complaints under 15.09.
[45:11.600 --> 45:15.040]  How does it feel being pushed up on this dime, bubba?
[45:15.840 --> 45:21.680]  So the next time I come to Rome, I go to a court hearing because a friend of mine got a ticket
[45:22.640 --> 45:29.840]  and the mayor I'm after, I mean, the municipal judge that I was after is gone.
[45:31.120 --> 45:32.080]  They got a new judge.
[45:33.280 --> 45:34.320]  I love when that happens.
[45:35.040 --> 45:39.680]  So I wonder, did he quit or did I get him fired?
[45:42.480 --> 45:46.480]  Because I've caused some serious difficulties.
[45:46.480 --> 45:52.320]  And there were no lawyers there.
[45:54.560 --> 45:57.280]  The municipal judge is holding these hearings.
[45:57.280 --> 45:59.440]  There's no prosecutor there.
[46:01.040 --> 46:04.640]  Generally, the prosecutor does the let's make a deal.
[46:05.920 --> 46:09.760]  And we had the judge do it, claiming she was doing a show-calls hearing.
[46:09.760 --> 46:17.360]  And clearly, this judge didn't know what she was doing and knew she didn't know what she was doing.
[46:19.360 --> 46:24.320]  Because she stood there and let me crawl all over the chief, the chief of police.
[46:25.360 --> 46:29.440]  We had a pretty good interaction with him.
[46:29.440 --> 46:30.720]  And I asked him to leave.
[46:30.720 --> 46:32.720]  He said I was too close to him to back up.
[46:33.280 --> 46:41.760]  I stood there and stared at it a minute and thought about it and thought, well, maybe I better back up because I don't want to give him a reason to pull his pistol.
[46:41.760 --> 46:43.200]  Well, I was concerned about it.
[46:43.840 --> 46:45.360]  This guy's got issues.
[46:47.600 --> 46:52.400]  And when I went home, he left before everything was finished.
[46:53.200 --> 46:56.400]  And I was concerned he was going to be sitting out there on the highway waiting for me.
[46:58.240 --> 46:59.600]  I've had that happen before.
[47:00.160 --> 47:05.200]  I've had that happen before, and that's very disconcerting.
[47:06.080 --> 47:07.520]  But fortunately, he wasn't.
[47:08.400 --> 47:13.120]  I think he just decided he might need to get the hell out of there, which he did.
[47:13.840 --> 47:15.600]  That part was good for him.
[47:16.160 --> 47:20.640]  But the judge clearly didn't know what she was doing.
[47:22.320 --> 47:25.040]  And I kind of landed in the middle of them.
[47:25.040 --> 47:29.280]  Now I'm going to go back and try to get a meeting with the mayor.
[47:30.560 --> 47:35.920]  And the city attorney and this judge.
[47:38.720 --> 47:46.560]  I'm going to say, guys, this is what I want you to do so that I don't wind up continuing to sue you.
[47:49.760 --> 47:57.200]  And specify the code and how it's supposed to work and ask them to do exactly what the code says.
[47:59.760 --> 48:04.800]  Make sure when you have people come in for that first hearing,
[48:04.800 --> 48:07.120]  you've got the officer there who wrote the ticket.
[48:08.480 --> 48:11.120]  And you hold a proper examining trial.
[48:13.200 --> 48:17.360]  And then if you want to try to make a deal, well, knock yourself out.
[48:18.960 --> 48:21.440]  But first, you let that person be heard.
[48:21.440 --> 48:32.160]  And then I'm going to want you and I want the mayor, not the mayor, I want the
[48:34.400 --> 48:43.680]  municipal judge to come down to Austin and testify before the Texas Senate subcommittee on
[48:44.640 --> 48:53.440]  criminal justice on how it works if you exercise your court exactly the way the law commands you to
[48:53.440 --> 49:00.240]  do. I don't think it'll make much difference. This guy was there to help. I've got him out of
[49:00.240 --> 49:04.480]  trouble several times. A couple of them were really big ones. One of them, they were trying
[49:04.480 --> 49:09.040]  to put him in jail for a year. And I got all of it thrown out, got everything expunged.
[49:09.040 --> 49:16.880]  Got everything fixed for him. Everything he needed, I got done for him. But he still paid the ticket.
[49:19.280 --> 49:22.480]  I gave him a whole stack of motions to file that would stop everything.
[49:22.480 --> 49:30.800]  He still paid the ticket. He was terrified. People come in there and they were absolutely
[49:30.800 --> 49:39.680]  terrified. And I want that fixed. I want people to come in there and feel comfortable.
[49:39.680 --> 49:47.280]  I walked right up to the clerk and said, I want a copy of the recording of this hearing. I was
[49:47.280 --> 49:54.960]  at least a bit intimidated. I want everybody else to be the same way. We're not recording this hearing.
[49:54.960 --> 49:59.760]  What? What? You're having a hearing? You're not recording? And Judge sat over and kept her mouth
[49:59.760 --> 50:05.760]  shut until she finally said, well, we don't have to record this because it's a show cause hearing.
[50:08.400 --> 50:14.400]  Now, how dumb is that? How can we have a show cause hearing?
[50:15.440 --> 50:20.800]  Have you ever heard of a show cause hearing in a criminal case? And even if it's not a criminal
[50:20.800 --> 50:24.320]  case, you ever heard of a show cause hearing that's not on the record?
[50:26.240 --> 50:31.520]  Nope. It would need to be on the record and it would need to be something that the law
[50:31.520 --> 50:36.720]  authorizes them to hold. Exactly. And there would have to be some paperwork filed to commence a case.
[50:37.440 --> 50:45.520]  Yeah. And she would have to know that. So she was just, I think this was her first day
[50:45.520 --> 50:52.720]  in on the bench and she was just playing it by ear. They already had this hearing,
[50:53.280 --> 50:58.960]  this day set. And yeah, I think the other judge either quit or got fired.
[51:01.360 --> 51:06.800]  And they got this new judge to stand in and then I come in there and land right in the middle of her.
[51:07.920 --> 51:12.560]  And she was clearly disconcerted.
[51:12.560 --> 51:20.080]  But she knew when she was telling me this was only a show cause hearing,
[51:21.280 --> 51:27.520]  that I knew that you couldn't hold a show cause hearing in this circumstance.
[51:29.120 --> 51:32.800]  Yeah. She knew that you were bluffing and you could tell.
[51:33.680 --> 51:36.000]  She knew that I knew she didn't know what she was doing.
[51:36.960 --> 51:43.040]  That's why she didn't say anything to me when the chief of police got in my face and I told him,
[51:43.040 --> 51:49.280]  go sit your butt down out there if we need you, I'll summon you. That didn't go over too well with
[51:49.280 --> 51:57.840]  him. But the judge did not interfere. I think the judge was really caught out of her element.
[51:58.800 --> 52:06.640]  I think she's afraid right now. She tried to wing it and play it by ear and I caught her.
[52:08.240 --> 52:13.200]  So I may have a chance to get, if I can sit down with the mayor cause the mayor doesn't have a dog
[52:13.200 --> 52:21.040]  in that hunt. This new judge doesn't really have a dog in that hunt. I'll sit down and school the
[52:21.280 --> 52:28.240]  mayor. This is how it should be done. Walker through the codes, step by step. This is how
[52:28.240 --> 52:37.120]  it's supposed to be done. The only thing I want out of it is for the accused not to be afraid of
[52:37.120 --> 52:44.800]  the court proceeding. For the accused first to be able to make a statement. They get to make a
[52:44.800 --> 52:52.240]  statement first, then they don't feel like they're being run over. Then the officer has to overcome
[52:52.240 --> 52:58.560]  their statement instead of them having to overcome the officer's statement. It flips the script.
[53:02.320 --> 53:05.440]  We'll probably have close to the same conviction rate,
[53:07.360 --> 53:12.800]  but we'll have people coming out of the court feeling like they had their day in court.
[53:15.120 --> 53:20.960]  That's what I really want. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Okay.
[53:22.080 --> 53:26.960]  We've got almost two and a half minutes left. Do you have anything else, Brett?
[53:27.600 --> 53:30.720]  Nothing on that. Let's go ahead to Alex.
[53:30.720 --> 53:35.360]  Let's go to Alex in California. Alex, what do you have for us today?
[53:35.360 --> 53:45.200]  Good evening, gentlemen. I wanted to know what ideas could you guys give me to find out the
[53:45.200 --> 53:54.800]  addresses. This is about my lawsuit in California against the three judges to find the addresses
[53:54.800 --> 54:00.240]  to actually serve them. Wait, wait, wait. These are police officers?
[54:00.320 --> 54:09.680]  No, these are judges. There's one presiding judge, one commissioner, one regular judge,
[54:09.680 --> 54:15.680]  and one CEO. If I sue them in their personal capacity, I cannot serve them at the court.
[54:16.400 --> 54:20.480]  Sure you can. You can serve them in the bathroom.
[54:23.040 --> 54:29.040]  You can serve them anywhere you can find them. What I'll do with that, what I did with the
[54:29.040 --> 54:36.640]  city of Rome is I went to the city manager and I said, I need you to talk to the mayor and get
[54:36.640 --> 54:44.320]  the mayor to agree to accept service for all of the city employees so that I don't have to go bang
[54:44.320 --> 54:50.400]  on their door at 10 o'clock at night at their home and disturb them at home.
[54:51.040 --> 54:57.600]  If these are public officials, you go down there. I went into the city council meeting
[54:58.640 --> 55:04.640]  and the city council meeting took a break and I took the service and dropped it on each one of
[55:04.640 --> 55:09.760]  the council members' desks. One of them was standing there and she said, well, thank you.
[55:10.720 --> 55:16.800]  No need to thank me. I'm serving you with a federal lawsuit. She said, well, I was doing
[55:16.800 --> 55:23.920]  a federal lawsuit. She said, well, I was just trying to be polite. I did this in the city
[55:23.920 --> 55:28.480]  council meeting. I went to the bailiff first and I told him what I'm going to do and I said,
[55:29.200 --> 55:37.120]  are you going to interfere with me? He said, it's your papers, but if he had tried to interfere with
[55:37.120 --> 55:42.560]  me, I'd have filed charges against him for interfering with service, which I had already
[55:42.560 --> 55:48.960]  filed on the city attorney because he told him not to accept it. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[55:50.160 --> 55:55.760]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[55:55.760 --> 56:01.760]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[56:01.760 --> 56:05.920]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[56:06.800 --> 56:13.280]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[56:13.280 --> 56:19.360]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound
[56:19.360 --> 56:24.560]  passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the
[56:24.560 --> 56:30.560]  word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[56:30.560 --> 56:36.640]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[56:36.640 --> 56:47.600]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[56:47.600 --> 56:49.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[56:52.800 --> 56:59.040]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[57:02.240 --> 57:06.560]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee
[57:06.560 --> 57:11.440]  the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr.
[57:11.440 --> 57:15.440]  Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your
[57:15.440 --> 57:21.600]  constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never
[57:21.600 --> 57:26.960]  get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish,
[57:26.960 --> 57:33.680]  too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[57:33.680 --> 57:38.880]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[57:38.880 --> 57:44.880]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[57:46.320 --> 57:51.200]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a third
[57:51.200 --> 57:56.160]  party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. That shocking image
[57:56.160 --> 58:00.960]  of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[58:00.960 --> 58:05.680]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days
[58:05.680 --> 58:10.640]  of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get it? So if you answer a knock
[58:10.640 --> 58:15.200]  at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of
[58:15.200 --> 58:20.240]  Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at
[58:20.240 --> 58:35.760]  CatherineAlbrecht.com. The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution.
[58:35.760 --> 58:40.480]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on
[58:40.480 --> 58:45.120]  it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of
[58:45.120 --> 58:51.040]  your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[58:51.040 --> 58:56.160]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will
[58:56.160 --> 59:02.000]  start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.520]  yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[59:07.520 --> 59:14.560]  startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Start
[59:14.560 --> 59:21.440]  Page. Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray
[59:21.440 --> 59:26.320]  goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from
[59:26.320 --> 59:32.000]  unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you. Get it? Unfortunately,
[59:32.000 --> 59:36.720]  the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point,
[59:36.720 --> 59:42.240]  TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees demand a peep at your
[59:42.240 --> 59:47.200]  privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[59:47.200 --> 59:50.480]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[59:50.480 --> 59:53.440]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[59:54.080 --> 59:58.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:12.240 --> 01:01:29.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. Brett told me it's the 21st
[01:01:29.120 --> 01:01:37.840]  of November. But he didn't tell me what day of the week it was or what year it is. He knows I'm old.
[01:01:37.920 --> 01:01:43.920]  Thursday, November 21st, 2024.
[01:01:44.960 --> 01:01:51.520]  There you go. And we're talking to Alex in California about
[01:01:53.040 --> 01:01:57.680]  who did you sue in California? Or what's the deal in California?
[01:01:58.640 --> 01:02:08.960]  Oh, that was the judges who violated several of my rights while they were pretending to act
[01:02:08.960 --> 01:02:20.320]  in their traditional function. Oh, this is... Have you seen my lawsuit in that regard?
[01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:27.360]  Yes, the one where you sued them for $480 million and you sued like 20 of them.
[01:02:27.360 --> 01:02:35.360]  Yeah, yeah. Did you pull out the section in there on how to get past a 12B1?
[01:02:39.360 --> 01:02:47.200]  Not recently, but it is in my files. And I have many. I have your suits. I have some big suits.
[01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:55.360]  Big suits and a lot of your files, Brett. Wait, that's big chumpsuit.
[01:02:57.760 --> 01:03:07.920]  I'm just kidding. Well, in my suit, I went to special care to brief out how to sue a public,
[01:03:08.400 --> 01:03:16.000]  a state official in the federal court so that they would have no immunity.
[01:03:18.160 --> 01:03:25.360]  And that keeps them from getting past a 12B1. I didn't know if you'd see that. The Young Doctrine
[01:03:25.360 --> 01:03:33.680]  and the Sovereign Immunity... Is that it, Brett? What is the one? The...
[01:03:35.120 --> 01:03:36.080]  Ex parte Young?
[01:03:36.080 --> 01:03:36.880]  Superior?
[01:03:36.880 --> 01:03:40.000]  No, not Young and the one about the...
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:42.240]  The supremacy clause, is that right?
[01:03:42.240 --> 01:03:46.240]  Supremacy, that's the word I was looking for. Yeah, the supremacy clause. Did you get that in there?
[01:03:48.160 --> 01:03:54.080]  I didn't yet, because I'm still waiting for the magistrate judge to come back to me,
[01:03:54.080 --> 01:03:58.960]  because he has to review my... He has to screen my lawsuit because of the
[01:03:59.680 --> 01:04:06.640]  informal papyrus procedure there. So I'm waiting for him to get back to me. He did deny my
[01:04:07.840 --> 01:04:14.960]  motion for electronic filing, which sucks. Now I have to serve all of them with paper.
[01:04:15.760 --> 01:04:19.760]  Well, you could have anybody serve them other than you.
[01:04:21.920 --> 01:04:28.160]  And the way I did it is I had a friend of mine take... I sued all of the judges of the
[01:04:28.160 --> 01:04:34.240]  Court of Criminal Appeals. There were eight or nine of them. And he went down to the Court
[01:04:34.240 --> 01:04:40.560]  of Criminal Appeals and gave it to the clerk and asked the clerk if she would accept service
[01:04:41.520 --> 01:04:48.320]  for all these judges. And she did. Handled, no problem.
[01:04:51.600 --> 01:04:59.360]  Okay, that's cool. And I was a process server for somebody and we ended up going to their houses.
[01:05:02.640 --> 01:05:06.000]  How did you fix the addresses? Is that so easy?
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:13.520]  Well, yeah, it's actually not hard at all. Now you were asking about California. I've
[01:05:13.520 --> 01:05:20.480]  got a subscription service that doesn't cover California, but there's somebody that you probably
[01:05:20.480 --> 01:05:28.640]  hear on a regular basis, Tina in California. She has a subscription to a service like that,
[01:05:28.640 --> 01:05:34.800]  and she is willing to help people for that. So pitch in a few bucks to help her with
[01:05:35.760 --> 01:05:40.480]  the fees that it's costing her, and she comes back with all that information.
[01:05:42.560 --> 01:05:45.120]  Okay. You can email them.
[01:05:46.560 --> 01:05:55.200]  If you're in California, what part of California are you in? San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco?
[01:05:56.720 --> 01:06:03.440]  Well, it would be Kern County, so near Bakersfield. That's one hour northeast of Los Angeles,
[01:06:03.440 --> 01:06:10.960]  sort of. So you're further north. No, San Francisco is north. Los Angeles is central. Okay.
[01:06:11.760 --> 01:06:13.680]  I think- All south.
[01:06:16.400 --> 01:06:20.960]  Not like San Diego. No, yeah. San Diego is an hour and-
[01:06:20.960 --> 01:06:25.360]  You're north of San Diego. I'm north of San Diego, yeah.
[01:06:25.360 --> 01:06:32.000]  Between, you've got San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. Okay. I think Tina is in San
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:38.400]  Luis Obispo. Oh, okay. That's kind of there. She's a little bit south of me then, I think.
[01:06:38.400 --> 01:06:44.960]  Yeah, that's the suburb of San Francisco. So yeah, she will be a great person to talk to.
[01:06:45.520 --> 01:06:51.920]  She is wonderful. I don't know if she's listening or not, but if we say too much good about her,
[01:06:51.920 --> 01:06:56.400]  then she'll get the big head. We need to accuse her of being churlish.
[01:06:57.600 --> 01:06:59.840]  She's also from Europe, which is cool.
[01:07:02.320 --> 01:07:11.680]  And Tina rocks. She takes no crap. She doesn't take prisoners. She is tough.
[01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:17.920]  If you're near each other enough, she might even be the process server for you.
[01:07:18.720 --> 01:07:25.120]  You just need somebody who's over 18 or some states that's 21 and not a party to the suit.
[01:07:25.120 --> 01:07:31.360]  It's a pretty simple thing. So to serve the process for you.
[01:07:32.640 --> 01:07:33.840]  Yeah.
[01:07:33.840 --> 01:07:41.680]  You could probably go down to any bar and say, I need somebody to serve a lawsuit on a smart mouth
[01:07:41.680 --> 01:07:45.840]  judge. Who's up for that? And you'll probably get overhand in the place.
[01:07:48.960 --> 01:07:50.400]  Yeah, I wonder.
[01:07:50.400 --> 01:07:52.000]  And if not, offer a free beer.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:01.600]  Yeah. Is there, for federal court, is there like a trick to get a motion for LA 20 to grant access
[01:08:01.600 --> 01:08:07.280]  to electronic filing as a pro se granted? Is there like a trick to it?
[01:08:08.640 --> 01:08:10.960]  Wait a minute. Get access to...
[01:08:10.960 --> 01:08:17.840]  Not that I know of. It's a motion and they decide if they're going to let you do it or not.
[01:08:20.400 --> 01:08:24.400]  Anybody can get on Pacer, but she's talking about to do e-filing.
[01:08:26.240 --> 01:08:30.720]  You can always look at it, but you can't always put documents into it.
[01:08:30.720 --> 01:08:39.600]  I'm working on that at this moment. There is a special filing that Pacer has two logins.
[01:08:40.640 --> 01:08:46.960]  One is you log in where you search Pacer and another you log in for your account.
[01:08:48.160 --> 01:08:59.200]  And on the account side, there's a place where you can go in and fill out paperwork to e-file.
[01:09:00.800 --> 01:09:08.480]  We were just two hours before the show. We were on the phone with the
[01:09:11.440 --> 01:09:13.840]  federal court in Oregon on this exact issue.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:17.200]  Well, they're not granting...
[01:09:17.200 --> 01:09:22.960]  What she's saying, Alex already moved the court to allow the e-filing and they denied it. So
[01:09:22.960 --> 01:09:28.400]  they're not letting her e-file. And for her, that's a pain. She wants to e-file.
[01:09:28.400 --> 01:09:37.520]  That may be because she didn't get all of the filings done because the federal courts
[01:09:38.960 --> 01:09:40.160]  allow e-filing.
[01:09:42.080 --> 01:09:47.600]  Overall, it's available, yes, but you have to move the court to allow it.
[01:09:49.120 --> 01:09:52.640]  Unless they're wanting to defraud you by saying,
[01:09:52.640 --> 01:09:56.800]  okay, we served you and they sent it to your email just because they know your email.
[01:09:56.880 --> 01:10:01.680]  But in general, they've got a motion that they want you to fill out.
[01:10:02.880 --> 01:10:08.720]  There's an application you have to fill out. You fill out an application first and it goes
[01:10:08.720 --> 01:10:13.280]  before the court. That's what we just did today, is you fill out this application.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:16.400]  It's a standard federal form.
[01:10:16.400 --> 01:10:24.400]  So they can't just deny it because if they denied you
[01:10:25.680 --> 01:10:32.480]  e-filing, it's because you didn't get something done right. Call the clerks. The clerks are always
[01:10:32.480 --> 01:10:38.320]  really in the federal court especially, very easy to get along with. They'll explain exactly how
[01:10:38.320 --> 01:10:45.360]  to do it. So I'll tell you how it went for me. I relied on the clerk and I should know because
[01:10:45.360 --> 01:10:50.960]  the clerk told me, you just file a motion. You don't even have to explain it. Just file a motion
[01:10:50.960 --> 01:11:01.520]  to be granted access to electronic filing just like that. And I did. I was denied and I was denied
[01:11:01.520 --> 01:11:11.680]  and there was some code of federal procedure and a local rule.
[01:11:11.680 --> 01:11:12.720]  A local court rule?
[01:11:12.720 --> 01:11:25.040]  I read both of them and the judge was correct. I should have provided a reason for him to grant
[01:11:25.040 --> 01:11:31.840]  me because usually only attorneys will be allowed to file electronically by default and a pro se
[01:11:32.480 --> 01:11:40.560]  have to ask the court. So I relied on the clerk and I should have read the local rule and so I
[01:11:40.560 --> 01:11:47.840]  was denied. So I filed a motion for reconsideration and I did acknowledge that I failed to read the
[01:11:47.840 --> 01:11:53.920]  local rule and now I'm providing these reasons as per local rule for why the court should grant me
[01:11:54.880 --> 01:12:01.120]  access. And even though I provided really good rational reasons, I think like...
[01:12:01.920 --> 01:12:07.600]  This is not the kind of thing that's contentious.
[01:12:09.200 --> 01:12:15.040]  So long as you treat the court with dignity and respect, the federal courts tend to do the same
[01:12:15.040 --> 01:12:23.120]  thing and if you didn't meet their requirements then they'll tell you and once you meet the
[01:12:23.120 --> 01:12:29.600]  requirements they'll allow you to file electronically. This probably almost certainly will not be a
[01:12:29.600 --> 01:12:37.760]  problem in the long run. No, I agree. I'm just saying like I made the mistake and I relied on
[01:12:37.760 --> 01:12:46.560]  the clerk's information and she was wrong and I failed to verify it. So maybe someone else
[01:12:46.560 --> 01:12:51.760]  hears that maybe that could help them like always verify it. I just didn't do it and that was my
[01:12:51.760 --> 01:13:00.320]  fault. Talk to Carabel about that. She filed a complaint against a clerk for giving her a hard
[01:13:00.320 --> 01:13:10.320]  time. I'm sorry, not Carabel. It was Tina who filed a complaint against a federal clerk for giving
[01:13:10.320 --> 01:13:22.720]  her a hard time. And boys... Tina's on the line. Oh, there we go. Cool, is she? Hello, Ms.
[01:13:22.800 --> 01:13:24.400]  Charlie. Tina.
[01:13:28.080 --> 01:13:36.480]  Tenacious. Tenacious, tenacious, yeah. Tenacious, that's the word. Okay, music's up.
[01:13:38.320 --> 01:13:46.560]  Let me go back on the other side. Tina, tell her about how you handled the federal clerk who gave
[01:13:46.560 --> 01:13:57.120]  you a problem. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain of We Love Our Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984,
[01:13:57.120 --> 01:14:03.760]  One Empty Space. We'll be right back. Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[01:14:03.760 --> 01:14:09.600]  and a better understanding of his word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8
[01:14:09.600 --> 01:14:15.120]  to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in
[01:14:15.120 --> 01:14:21.440]  accord with 2 Timothy 2-15. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to
[01:14:21.440 --> 01:14:27.200]  be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are
[01:14:27.200 --> 01:14:32.160]  in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:14:32.160 --> 01:14:37.040]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and
[01:14:37.040 --> 01:14:42.080]  Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all
[01:14:42.080 --> 01:14:47.120]  those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves
[01:14:47.120 --> 01:14:52.240]  more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to scripture talk live on
[01:14:52.240 --> 01:14:59.200]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[01:15:00.800 --> 01:15:06.480]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt
[01:15:06.480 --> 01:15:12.080]  collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal
[01:15:12.080 --> 01:15:17.120]  court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in
[01:15:17.120 --> 01:15:22.800]  plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted
[01:15:22.800 --> 01:15:28.320]  by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors
[01:15:28.320 --> 01:15:34.320]  out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:15:34.320 --> 01:15:39.600]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[01:15:39.600 --> 01:15:44.960]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:15:44.960 --> 01:15:50.320]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. That's
[01:15:50.320 --> 01:16:00.240]  RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:16:00.240 --> 01:16:08.160]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:16:30.240 --> 01:16:51.520]  Okay, we are back at Radio California. We're talking to Alex in California. We just brought on Tina
[01:16:52.400 --> 01:17:00.000]  and we were talking about how to handle clerks. Tina, she had a clerk give her bad information
[01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:04.400]  about e-filing. Do you talk to her about that and how to deal with that?
[01:17:08.400 --> 01:17:16.400]  I actually filed a complaint. It was a conduct complaint.
[01:17:18.720 --> 01:17:24.400]  No, I just related it. This is what the clerk said. They were trying to say that I couldn't
[01:17:25.120 --> 01:17:32.000]  file where I said and I had to, you know, they were not a lawyer because they had to go
[01:17:32.640 --> 01:17:41.040]  to hire people and see if I was in the correct case. It happened. The other side had the
[01:17:41.040 --> 01:17:46.320]  opportunity to change that. It's not up to the clerk to decide that. It's up to the
[01:17:46.320 --> 01:17:53.440]  of the three to file a motion to move it to the correct court. It was a professional
[01:17:53.440 --> 01:17:57.920]  conduct complaint and I just laid out the facts and I sent it to the supervisor.
[01:18:02.080 --> 01:18:07.120]  They came back and said, you know, you're right. Besides, you know, just have that ability,
[01:18:07.120 --> 01:18:13.520]  we are going to file it. Then after that, it was interesting because that same clerk became
[01:18:13.520 --> 01:18:25.040]  extremely helpful to me and so then I filed a professional compliment to their supervisor
[01:18:25.600 --> 01:18:34.480]  and it was a great end day. It was amazing how much help I got after I did that. You
[01:18:34.480 --> 01:18:39.600]  first have to file the professional conduct complaint and you just make it to the fact.
[01:18:40.080 --> 01:18:47.040]  You know, say, oh, people, you know, and I just pointed out what they did wrong,
[01:18:47.040 --> 01:18:55.600]  what the other side could do and I said this is wrong because they need the help. We were not
[01:18:55.600 --> 01:19:05.040]  trained attorneys and it changed everything for me in that particular court. The next one was a
[01:19:05.040 --> 01:19:14.080]  different court and they were changing the record and I will tell you, you should print out the
[01:19:15.520 --> 01:19:24.720]  doc as soon as you can because they were changing some things and I filed a complaint against the
[01:19:24.720 --> 01:19:43.920]  clerk. Another thing about that is you can ask for them to include the comments and notes
[01:19:43.920 --> 01:19:48.640]  because they have some metadata that's just in their office and they never expect anybody to
[01:19:48.640 --> 01:19:53.840]  want to see it but you can ask for it and it has very helpful little things like it'll show you
[01:19:54.720 --> 01:20:01.280]  somebody's initials saying let the prosecutor ask the prosecutor if I should do this or that
[01:20:02.960 --> 01:20:10.560]  and so yeah, early and often and ask for the comments. Yes, that's a good point.
[01:20:15.440 --> 01:20:21.760]  When things are filed and when I check because sometimes that doesn't add up, you know,
[01:20:22.160 --> 01:20:29.840]  the time it comes in, the time they do things and you know, you've got to really watch it.
[01:20:32.240 --> 01:20:41.920]  So don't be afraid to and if there's a compliment deserved, do that and I actually pointed out to
[01:20:41.920 --> 01:20:48.960]  the, you know, the head person and I said this is what needs to happen which per se may be
[01:20:49.760 --> 01:20:57.120]  a little class, an online class to teach per se how to go through this because it is your duty
[01:20:57.120 --> 01:21:00.240]  to help everybody.
[01:21:00.880 --> 01:21:07.520]  Oh yeah, they've done it but they said they would certainly look into it.
[01:21:17.680 --> 01:21:19.280]  Was this a court in Fresno?
[01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:36.560]  Oh, okay. Oh, you are in the, yeah, I'm in the eastern district. You're, then you're in one of
[01:21:36.560 --> 01:21:44.240]  the other ones. Yeah. Oh, I see, okay. Oh, it would have been interesting if that would have
[01:21:44.240 --> 01:21:50.800]  been the same court in the same clerk but it's not. The other thing you can do, have you checked
[01:21:50.800 --> 01:21:56.320]  the roving room for California? Have you ever gone on there and looked up your judge?
[01:21:58.640 --> 01:22:04.880]  What room? It's called theroom.com and you can,
[01:22:04.880 --> 01:22:17.040]  and it tells you a lot about certain judges. It has the judges listed and it will give ratings
[01:22:17.840 --> 01:22:24.000]  and literally, I'm one judge that had the most appalling room. I mean one that's
[01:22:26.160 --> 01:22:32.720]  ego is because in this courtroom, the whole, the whole building, she's, you know, she's in
[01:22:32.720 --> 01:22:38.800]  D.I.I. I mean they ringed her and I put that case of like I'm, I'm going to list this. This
[01:22:38.800 --> 01:22:46.400]  is what this judge is about. Here's your report because what have you got to lose? I mean it's
[01:22:46.400 --> 01:22:54.240]  out there, putting in there, so check it out. You'll particularly have a rating. They may have a
[01:22:54.240 --> 01:22:59.760]  rating of two. They may have a rating of five but read through all of this if they're on there.
[01:23:00.720 --> 01:23:07.760]  What is this? It's very hard for me to understand you. Is it ruling.com? What is the website?
[01:23:15.760 --> 01:23:18.880]  Tina, are you using a hands-free device?
[01:23:23.280 --> 01:23:27.920]  Try moving the mic a little further from your mouth. I'm getting a lot of distortion as well.
[01:23:29.760 --> 01:23:37.920]  I think it's just my, my phone and it's about five percent. So that's much, that is much better.
[01:23:39.040 --> 01:23:48.240]  Yeah, okay. I've got five percent but give that a try and I heard you saying that I have,
[01:23:48.240 --> 01:23:54.720]  I do have a subscription to check on people and if someone's in a little bit that I pay monthly
[01:23:55.280 --> 01:24:04.240]  I'm happy to report whatever. It really gives you some, like any of these people and addresses.
[01:24:04.880 --> 01:24:13.120]  That's everything. Alex, can you send me a request for contact to Tina and I will forward that to
[01:24:13.120 --> 01:24:20.560]  Tina. So you guys can. That's awesome. Thank you so much. Okay, I'll do that. All right Tina,
[01:24:20.560 --> 01:24:26.000]  I'll let you have your time with the two gentlemen here. Have a good night. Well,
[01:24:27.680 --> 01:24:34.960]  two gentlemen? Yeah, aren't you one of them? Brett, Brett, who else are they talking about?
[01:24:36.480 --> 01:24:43.760]  Are you not one of them? I don't think, well you'd have to ask my wife and I don't think she'd go
[01:24:43.760 --> 01:24:55.840]  for that. Okay, okay. Us poor guys, we're so mistreated. Don't you feel sorry for me, Tina?
[01:24:58.160 --> 01:25:04.000]  I don't feel sorry. Yeah, I didn't think so. Okay, thank you Alex.
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:16.080]  Okay, Tina, we had Ted in front of you. Have you ever, have you talked to Ted directly?
[01:25:17.360 --> 01:25:25.760]  Oh, we lost the time. I've been on his court hearings too. Ted, say hello to Tina.
[01:25:25.760 --> 01:25:33.920]  Yeah, it's good to hear from you again.
[01:25:42.480 --> 01:25:50.160]  So Randy, the last call regarding the PACER and all that, I just sent you and Brett an email.
[01:25:50.960 --> 01:26:00.400]  It is from the Fed Court in the Northern District of California, but anybody can have,
[01:26:01.760 --> 01:26:07.040]  right now what it says, and it's right on the website, that pro se litigants,
[01:26:07.040 --> 01:26:13.440]  whose names appear on existing cases before this court, may register to become ECF users
[01:26:13.440 --> 01:26:19.120]  and may file documents electronically without first obtaining a judge's permission.
[01:26:20.560 --> 01:26:26.400]  So there it is. So is that unique to the Northern District?
[01:26:27.920 --> 01:26:34.400]  No, and I would, since I sent it to you and Brett, maybe you guys can get it over to this lady.
[01:26:35.280 --> 01:26:40.560]  So all the courts, all the fed courts that operate the same, and she should just,
[01:26:41.360 --> 01:26:46.560]  where she got wrapped around the axle was submitting the request when she didn't need to.
[01:26:46.560 --> 01:26:53.840]  Okay, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll look at our radio, we'll be right back.
[01:27:03.040 --> 01:27:10.080]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing,
[01:27:10.080 --> 01:27:13.200]  but now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:27:13.200 --> 01:27:16.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:27:16.800 --> 01:27:22.400]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again,
[01:27:22.400 --> 01:27:26.800]  and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:27:27.440 --> 01:27:33.680]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:27:33.680 --> 01:27:38.320]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:27:38.320 --> 01:27:44.320]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:27:44.320 --> 01:27:51.600]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? If so, you might think that multitasking
[01:27:51.600 --> 01:27:57.440]  proves you're smart, but think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. A new study
[01:27:57.440 --> 01:28:02.320]  finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually makes it harder
[01:28:02.320 --> 01:28:07.760]  for people to manage problems. Researchers at Yale University found that stressed-out people
[01:28:07.760 --> 01:28:12.880]  have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex. That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh
[01:28:12.880 --> 01:28:18.960]  conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help
[01:28:18.960 --> 01:28:24.480]  keep your mind as sharp as a tack. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com,
[01:28:24.480 --> 01:28:35.360]  the world's most private search engine. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell
[01:28:35.360 --> 01:28:39.520]  on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down. However,
[01:28:39.520 --> 01:28:45.280]  1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow
[01:28:45.280 --> 01:28:49.920]  service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders have died. I'm not
[01:28:49.920 --> 01:28:53.760]  a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an
[01:28:53.760 --> 01:28:59.200]  Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:28:59.200 --> 01:29:06.320]  rememberbuilding7.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:29:06.320 --> 01:29:10.080]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to
[01:29:10.080 --> 01:29:14.320]  have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[01:29:14.320 --> 01:29:17.840]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private
[01:29:17.840 --> 01:29:22.320]  capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[01:29:22.320 --> 01:29:26.640]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:29:26.640 --> 01:29:29.680]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:29:29.680 --> 01:29:33.520]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[01:29:33.520 --> 01:29:37.600]  due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this
[01:29:37.600 --> 01:29:42.320]  invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[01:29:42.320 --> 01:29:46.640]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video
[01:29:46.640 --> 01:29:51.200]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource
[01:29:51.200 --> 01:29:55.600]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:29:55.600 --> 01:29:59.680]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:29:59.680 --> 01:30:08.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:31:30.400 --> 01:31:35.440]  You didn't sound entirely happy about that.
[01:31:35.440 --> 01:31:43.440]  Yeah, I lost my place in where I was at. I was kind of confused there. Okay, I was noticing that
[01:31:46.800 --> 01:31:51.600]  Tina had dropped off and I was kind of trying to do three things at once thinking I hope she gets
[01:31:51.600 --> 01:32:06.800]  her phone plugged in and can call back in. We got Ted. Ted, what do you have for us? Now,
[01:32:06.800 --> 01:32:12.800]  Ted tried to talk to me about his case a couple of times, but he caught me when I was so exhausted
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:19.520]  I couldn't think. Ted, I'm a lot better off today. I'm not quite so wiped out.
[01:32:22.320 --> 01:32:28.800]  Well, don't sound so excited to hear from me. Well, I am, and I apologize for the last two
[01:32:28.800 --> 01:32:34.320]  times you called. Man, you're talking to me. My brain is feeling like mush because I'd been on
[01:32:34.320 --> 01:32:40.080]  the phone all day long and I hated to put you off of all people, but I was whacked.
[01:32:41.600 --> 01:32:48.320]  I think I didn't have enough medicine. I think what you're telling me is my timing is impeccable,
[01:32:48.320 --> 01:32:57.920]  and that's why so many people really like me. Judges and prosecutors and police officers.
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:02.720]  Yeah, that's what I was thinking. They so sarcastically appreciate you.
[01:33:04.240 --> 01:33:14.480]  Oh, yeah. They've all found an appreciation for me. So, yeah, just the regarding this
[01:33:14.560 --> 01:33:20.160]  e-filing in the federal court. Get yourself a Pacer account, and when you do,
[01:33:20.800 --> 01:33:26.000]  you don't give them a credit card number. You don't have to. You don't have to have a credit
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:36.880]  card attached to your Pacer account. It doesn't help. They don't use it. Every month they shut me
[01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:45.200]  off, and I have to go in and manually pay them. They got my information. They don't use it.
[01:33:47.040 --> 01:33:54.560]  That's annoying. I've only been charged one time because if you don't run up a $30 bill
[01:33:54.560 --> 01:33:58.960]  within a quarter, I think it is, well, then they don't charge you at all.
[01:33:58.960 --> 01:34:03.840]  But I have gotten hit one time on my credit card. They didn't hit me at all.
[01:34:03.840 --> 01:34:09.360]  I'm trying to get them to, and I can't find anything to auto-pay. They just shut it off for $31.
[01:34:11.680 --> 01:34:18.160]  If it was $30, they would just wipe it off. So $31.10, they cut it off.
[01:34:19.440 --> 01:34:24.160]  I've got to spend a couple of hours trying to figure out how to get to the right place to pay
[01:34:24.160 --> 01:34:29.280]  them. I don't know. A government employee built this site. It's a pain in the neck.
[01:34:29.840 --> 01:34:36.320]  It's no more than Pacer. It shouldn't be that much of a problem. Anyway, I'll stop grabbing.
[01:34:38.800 --> 01:34:48.000]  I've been through all of this stuff. Actually, it's just like working on a Mercedes or any
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:52.080]  other German car. You've got to think like a German. When you're on these government websites,
[01:34:52.080 --> 01:34:54.000]  you've got to think like a government employee.
[01:34:54.960 --> 01:34:58.480]  Now, but that would force me to stop thinking.
[01:35:00.640 --> 01:35:01.680]  Well, that's part of it.
[01:35:01.680 --> 01:35:03.440]  Does that mean you've got to get a lobotomy?
[01:35:06.640 --> 01:35:10.320]  When you're using it, yes. No, it's not that bad.
[01:35:10.320 --> 01:35:13.680]  Okay, that was unfair. That was unfair. We do really have
[01:35:14.480 --> 01:35:26.160]  good employees. This thing with Trump and Elon Musk and this Vivek wanting to cut back to
[01:35:26.160 --> 01:35:30.720]  government, I really see the problem because we really do have good people in government
[01:35:32.080 --> 01:35:35.520]  and people who want to do the job, and they want to do the job right.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:44.880]  But when you're in such a massive system, you get caught up in the flow of things,
[01:35:46.080 --> 01:35:52.400]  and it's hard to get out of the flow, and we'll have to get rid of otherwise good people.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:54.800]  Life is tough.
[01:35:59.920 --> 01:36:03.600]  There are good people in government, and most of the people I know in government
[01:36:03.600 --> 01:36:08.480]  want to do things right. If we stand back and look at them from a distance,
[01:36:08.480 --> 01:36:13.280]  they look like jackbooty thugs. But when you go in and actually talk to people,
[01:36:14.880 --> 01:36:18.400]  and don't go in there and start a fight with them, just talk to them like you're human beings,
[01:36:20.480 --> 01:36:22.880]  they seem like ordinary human beings.
[01:36:24.800 --> 01:36:29.520]  And they're helpful, and they're easy to get along with, they want to do things right,
[01:36:30.240 --> 01:36:32.160]  and they're stuck with the way things are set up.
[01:36:34.560 --> 01:36:38.320]  We need to go after the ones who set things up. That's why I'm going after these judges.
[01:36:41.280 --> 01:36:45.920]  They're the ones who set the rules, so if one of their people violates the rules,
[01:36:45.920 --> 01:36:47.840]  I want to go after the judge who set the rules.
[01:36:52.560 --> 01:36:53.840]  It got real quiet out there.
[01:36:57.440 --> 01:36:58.320]  Am I still on?
[01:36:58.960 --> 01:36:59.600]  Ted, are you with us?
[01:37:01.920 --> 01:37:08.640]  There's all kinds of people working for the government. It's just a microcosm of our
[01:37:08.640 --> 01:37:14.240]  country. So you've got good people and bad people. And if you want to be a pain in the butt,
[01:37:16.400 --> 01:37:19.840]  it's really easy to be a pain in the butt when you're a government employee.
[01:37:19.840 --> 01:37:23.120]  You can give people a hard time, just like this previous caller.
[01:37:23.120 --> 01:37:26.240]  Those people could have helped her. She could be all set up right now.
[01:37:26.800 --> 01:37:32.160]  And this thing that I sent you the link, and you can forward it to her,
[01:37:33.040 --> 01:37:37.760]  you read it, it says right on there, you don't even have to get the judge's permission
[01:37:38.960 --> 01:37:44.400]  to have an ECF user account. And so you can just do it.
[01:37:45.440 --> 01:37:51.120]  And actually, as I scrolled down, the step-by-step instructions are part of that link I sent you
[01:37:51.120 --> 01:37:58.880]  guys. And it's just unfortunate she ran into somebody. And she's probably used to, like me
[01:37:58.880 --> 01:38:05.200]  as well, butting heads with some of these people. But yeah, I've found all kinds.
[01:38:06.240 --> 01:38:13.040]  Come on. I had early on somebody from the Superior Court give me an anonymous phone call
[01:38:13.040 --> 01:38:21.840]  and told me, watch out. You know, so Judge Mnuchin flipped out because Marshall served him.
[01:38:21.840 --> 01:38:26.640]  You better watch out. And I don't know who that person is to this day.
[01:38:28.400 --> 01:38:31.920]  That's cool. That is so good to hear.
[01:38:32.400 --> 01:38:41.200]  I've had a public official once that I had developed a good rapport and level of trust with.
[01:38:42.960 --> 01:38:52.080]  And he told me something he did. And I said, holy mackerel, are you out of your mind?
[01:38:52.960 --> 01:38:56.240]  He said, that can get you disbarred. That can get you in jail.
[01:38:56.320 --> 01:38:59.120]  That can get you disbarred. That can get you in jail.
[01:39:00.560 --> 01:39:10.560]  He said, I know. But what was going on was just wrong. And I could not let it be.
[01:39:13.200 --> 01:39:17.120]  This is someone deep in the court system, and I would have never expected it.
[01:39:18.800 --> 01:39:23.200]  There are really good people out there. They're trapped inside a system they didn't create.
[01:39:23.200 --> 01:39:29.920]  And with that said, that does not mean you have to cut them slack.
[01:39:32.320 --> 01:39:38.800]  Sometimes you have to kick them in the butt so that they have plausible deniability.
[01:39:38.800 --> 01:39:45.760]  You go fix something. I talked to a policeman here in Texas, and he told me something.
[01:39:45.760 --> 01:39:57.120]  This is a guy I'm helping with a lawsuit, that there is something in the rules of professional
[01:39:57.120 --> 01:40:05.760]  conduct that requires a policeman to report bad conduct by another policeman. I told him about
[01:40:05.760 --> 01:40:17.600]  this statute in Colorado that made it a crime for a police officer to not report bad behavior
[01:40:17.600 --> 01:40:25.360]  by another police officer, and told him about this video I saw of this woman being stopped
[01:40:25.360 --> 01:40:31.200]  by a policeman, a frail, she might have been 90 pounds, walking down the side of a road.
[01:40:31.760 --> 01:40:37.680]  And a policeman stopped her and wanted to see her receipt because he didn't believe
[01:40:37.680 --> 01:40:44.320]  she paid for some stuff she got from Walmart. That's unheard of. And clearly this woman had
[01:40:44.320 --> 01:40:51.280]  dementia. She was old and frail. He wound up arresting her, and she struggled because she
[01:40:51.280 --> 01:40:57.280]  was confused. He broke her wrist. I'll pick this up on the other side. This is a good story.
[01:40:57.920 --> 01:41:04.960]  I like this. Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save
[01:41:04.960 --> 01:41:10.240]  hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can
[01:41:10.240 --> 01:41:16.880]  afford to be on? Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[01:41:16.880 --> 01:41:24.560]  by lowering the claims cost? The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[01:41:24.560 --> 01:41:31.280]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all
[01:41:31.280 --> 01:41:38.320]  at zero cost with zero copay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying
[01:41:38.320 --> 01:41:45.440]  less in FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA
[01:41:45.440 --> 01:41:52.400]  taxes. The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[01:41:52.400 --> 01:42:04.080]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:04.640 --> 01:42:10.160]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand,
[01:42:10.160 --> 01:42:17.440]  four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:42:17.440 --> 01:42:21.200]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:42:21.200 --> 01:42:27.280]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you
[01:42:27.280 --> 01:42:33.680]  can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning
[01:42:33.680 --> 01:42:39.680]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:42:39.680 --> 01:42:46.000]  the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom,
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:53.520]  video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[01:42:53.520 --> 01:43:01.040]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:23.520 --> 01:43:30.640]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully.
[01:43:32.080 --> 01:43:39.040]  Somebody's on a police, a policeman. Somebody's on a police, a police.
[01:43:40.560 --> 01:43:45.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Fountain Rule of Law Radio. I didn't realize this is our last
[01:43:45.680 --> 01:43:51.280]  segment already. I'll go quickly with the story. This little, this woman was just tiny and frail
[01:43:51.840 --> 01:43:57.200]  and kind of broke my heart to watch this cop pushing her around. He calls, she resists him
[01:43:57.200 --> 01:44:01.440]  because she's obviously confused. She doesn't understand what's happening. So he calls for
[01:44:01.440 --> 01:44:07.920]  backup. A citizen pulled over and went up to the policeman asking him, what the heck is going on
[01:44:07.920 --> 01:44:14.960]  here? Because that's how outrageous it appeared from someone driving down the street. And he went
[01:44:14.960 --> 01:44:20.080]  talked to him and was real calm and handled himself well with this guy. And this guy said,
[01:44:20.080 --> 01:44:26.080]  okay. And he left. The female cop that he called to help contain this woman, get her in the car.
[01:44:28.400 --> 01:44:35.680]  Six months later, I see another video on this same issue. The female policewoman who came and
[01:44:35.680 --> 01:44:41.760]  helped this guy contain this frail woman and put her in the car, they wound up breaking her wrist
[01:44:41.760 --> 01:44:49.760]  because she had osteoporosis. They didn't realize she broke her wrist. They show her in the cell,
[01:44:49.760 --> 01:44:54.080]  moaning in pain. And these cops are out here laughing and joking about arresting her.
[01:44:55.120 --> 01:45:02.800]  The next time I see the video, the female cop got 180 days in jail. The cop, I think he got two years.
[01:45:04.640 --> 01:45:09.920]  The female got 180 days in jail because she didn't report the male cop.
[01:45:11.440 --> 01:45:17.520]  They got a statute in Colorado that requires them to report it. I told this to a policeman,
[01:45:17.520 --> 01:45:23.920]  friend of mine, and he said there is a requirement in the TECOL,
[01:45:26.800 --> 01:45:31.280]  something in TECOL that requires them to do that, and he's going to be sending that to me.
[01:45:33.200 --> 01:45:38.720]  Oh, well, that'd be good. And it's not because we want to get the cops in trouble.
[01:45:39.760 --> 01:45:46.240]  It's because now if one policeman sees another policeman acting ignorant, he can put a stop to
[01:45:46.240 --> 01:45:52.560]  it and say, look, Bubba, you're going to wind up causing me to lose my certification.
[01:45:53.840 --> 01:45:59.520]  So I've got to report you. I don't have any option. It eliminates the thin blue line.
[01:46:03.520 --> 01:46:07.920]  Well, it gives the good guys an opportunity to help eliminate that line.
[01:46:07.920 --> 01:46:13.680]  And I think we have way more good cops than we realize. We just need to give them a way
[01:46:13.920 --> 01:46:22.800]  to be able to fix things. We do have Alex back on. OK, Ted, this is your time.
[01:46:24.800 --> 01:46:34.960]  Well, they're dismissing my federal case. The judge granted their motion to dismiss.
[01:46:36.400 --> 01:46:42.320]  He denied their motion to have me declared vexatious, said they didn't meet the burden
[01:46:42.320 --> 01:46:51.680]  of proof. But one of the things as I'm reading through the opinion is that they're talking about
[01:46:51.680 --> 01:47:00.240]  immunity, for one thing. And I don't think this judge truly appreciates. They don't have immunity.
[01:47:01.120 --> 01:47:07.360]  They never had jurisdiction to prosecute me, and they made up a phony felony charge that doesn't
[01:47:07.360 --> 01:47:15.360]  exist, and then used that for eight years and all that they did to me. And it's a wonder that I'm
[01:47:15.360 --> 01:47:33.760]  even alive, honestly. Part of the reason they're saying this is over is because I filed lawsuits
[01:47:33.760 --> 01:47:46.480]  I filed lawsuits previously. But I was doing it trying to survive, and the fact that I felt
[01:47:46.480 --> 01:47:52.240]  they were violating my rights and not taking me to trial, and that we were way, way past
[01:47:52.240 --> 01:48:03.120]  any reasonable time, and they were way outside the law. And what I realized is those other cases,
[01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:10.160]  it's not res judicata, because this is a continuum. They continued to violate my rights.
[01:48:12.560 --> 01:48:14.880]  Are you getting your appeal together?
[01:48:16.400 --> 01:48:22.400]  Well, this is the question. Do I want to first try to do a motion of reconsideration?
[01:48:23.120 --> 01:48:26.400]  Absolutely. Absolutely. Stops the clock on appeal.
[01:48:26.400 --> 01:48:36.240]  Okay, the reason is, and this is for everyone, what am I exactly going to appeal? I don't have
[01:48:36.240 --> 01:48:42.560]  anything in the record. That's why you asked for reconsideration. You say that the court failed to
[01:48:43.680 --> 01:48:50.400]  they gave you a judgment. Did the judgment address anything with facts and law?
[01:48:51.040 --> 01:48:58.480]  Yes. And it's really, that's strange how they did that, too. You're asking really good questions.
[01:48:58.480 --> 01:49:05.760]  They gave a judgment that's like two sentences. Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff.
[01:49:07.360 --> 01:49:17.360]  That's not a judgment. That's an order. That's the ruling against you. A judgment is finding
[01:49:17.440 --> 01:49:25.200]  a fact and conclusion to law. They have to say what facts they relied on and how they applied
[01:49:25.200 --> 01:49:30.240]  the law to those facts. Otherwise, how are you supposed to be able to appeal a judgment?
[01:49:31.840 --> 01:49:35.920]  Well, the way they've set this up is that they don't want me to appeal it.
[01:49:36.480 --> 01:49:41.360]  Of course they don't. Who cares? Well, I mean the court and that the
[01:49:41.440 --> 01:49:49.600]  the this was dismissed with prejudice and I wasn't allowed even a first amended complaint.
[01:49:50.640 --> 01:49:57.760]  Then file your demand for findings of facts and conclusions in law. Provide your own findings of
[01:49:57.760 --> 01:50:06.960]  fact. This is your precursor to appeal. So you provide, you prepare a findings of fact and
[01:50:06.960 --> 01:50:13.840]  conclusions at law and ask the court to provide you with findings of fact and conclusions or
[01:50:13.840 --> 01:50:20.480]  accept yours. Now they're going to deny it, but this gets you halfway toward an appeal
[01:50:20.480 --> 01:50:24.880]  and then when they deny it, it resets the appeal clock. So it buys you more time.
[01:50:25.040 --> 01:50:34.000]  Okay. You know, I, I'll have to read through it. You have to read these several times.
[01:50:35.040 --> 01:50:42.240]  I'm looking at this, this order granting motion to dismiss and denying the pre-filing motion.
[01:50:42.800 --> 01:50:51.680]  It's 20 pages long, actually. And I don't like that he combined the defendants made
[01:50:52.160 --> 01:51:01.120]  the defendants made two motions and I don't like it that the judge combined both motions into,
[01:51:02.400 --> 01:51:08.320]  you know, one, whatever you want to call this, that's an order granting motion to dismiss.
[01:51:08.960 --> 01:51:16.400]  I don't like that he combined them because it muddies up, you know, what is what.
[01:51:16.400 --> 01:51:18.320]  Raise, raise that in your appeal.
[01:51:20.960 --> 01:51:25.120]  Raise it in your motion for findings of fact and conclusions.
[01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:32.560]  You prepare your own and say, you know, address this combining them as inappropriate,
[01:51:33.520 --> 01:51:43.360]  provide your own case law and in his, in their order, in their judgment, did they provide any
[01:51:43.360 --> 01:51:51.600]  case law at all? Yes. Yeah. And they're talking about younger abstention and, you know, they,
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:51:58.640]  did you pull up all their case law and check to make sure that it says what they said it said?
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  I haven't been able to do that yet. Do that first. You may be surprised.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:11.200]  You're going to have fun with that. 80% of the trash they put out there is just garbage.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:19.680]  And if you can show that they relied on bad case law, mandamus or an appeal will get you
[01:52:19.680 --> 01:52:25.040]  right back into court. When you pull up all their stuff, Ted, you're going to start giggling because
[01:52:26.800 --> 01:52:33.280]  they so often make a big mess out of that. Not only do they cite things that are not on point,
[01:52:33.280 --> 01:52:36.800]  but they will say that a case says something it doesn't say.
[01:52:36.880 --> 01:52:43.920]  I'm looking into these cases. If they cite a case, I go in the case and try to find it.
[01:52:43.920 --> 01:52:53.360]  80% of the time I don't. I find a sentence fragment of the attorney general, first page,
[01:52:53.360 --> 01:53:03.120]  first paragraph, cites a 20-year-old case unpublished, pulled a sentence fragment
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:09.440]  that if you put the dependent clause back on the sentence, it made the sentence say something else.
[01:53:10.160 --> 01:53:17.040]  And if you put the sentence into the paragraph it came out, it was totally different. This was
[01:53:17.680 --> 01:53:26.000]  insane. Look them all up and document all their mess that they made. You're going to have fun.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:30.400]  You'll be smiling. That will get you back into court.
[01:53:31.360 --> 01:53:35.280]  When you say they, it's the judge that's citing these cases.
[01:53:35.280 --> 01:53:41.840]  The judge, yeah. The judge uses the trash that the prosecutors give him.
[01:53:41.840 --> 01:53:50.640]  He don't check all those cases. You go check the cases and 80% that I got from the attorney general
[01:53:51.360 --> 01:54:00.320]  was trash. It was amazing how screwed up their case law is. So first thing you do is check
[01:54:00.320 --> 01:54:07.120]  all the case law and that does not take long. It used to, but now give me a case 30 seconds.
[01:54:07.120 --> 01:54:15.760]  I got it ripped to shreds. Go to case text. Case text is great. You just put in case text,
[01:54:15.760 --> 01:54:21.360]  the case number, get the case. Then you search for whatever they cited out of it.
[01:54:21.360 --> 01:54:26.960]  Most of the time it's not going to be in there. So then you'll have to take the sentence apart
[01:54:26.960 --> 01:54:32.400]  and find words in there that you can find in the original case because they paraphrased it.
[01:54:33.920 --> 01:54:37.120]  When you find what they paraphrased, they paraphrased it.
[01:54:39.520 --> 01:54:45.040]  It is amazing how messed up their case law is. That gives us a tremendous advantage.
[01:54:45.840 --> 01:54:51.920]  So do that first. Take the judge's judgment and rip it apart for him.
[01:54:51.920 --> 01:54:56.720]  I think you'll call us back next week,
[01:54:56.720 --> 01:55:02.240]  chuckling and laughing at what you find. I'll call you back tomorrow.
[01:55:03.440 --> 01:55:07.600]  Good, good, good, good. Get on it today. Let's talk about that tomorrow. This would be great.
[01:55:10.240 --> 01:55:17.920]  Just remember that the defendant, you cited a case for fixation and it turned out that
[01:55:17.920 --> 01:55:20.640]  that case had been overturned by the appellate court.
[01:55:21.280 --> 01:55:23.520]  Well, that should get a motion for sanctions.
[01:55:24.480 --> 01:55:27.040]  And I did and they totally ignored my-
[01:55:27.040 --> 01:55:32.000]  That's okay. You just keep pushing them. When you get to the appellate court, things change.
[01:55:32.960 --> 01:55:38.720]  Okay. Thank you all for listening. We are out of time. Randy Kelton, Bretton Fountain,
[01:55:38.720 --> 01:55:44.240]  Rule of Law Radio. We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour info marathon.
[01:55:44.240 --> 01:55:50.400]  Thank you all for listening and good night.