[00:00.000 --> 00:05.680] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.680 --> 00:09.320] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.320 --> 00:10.800] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.800 --> 00:14.740] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.740 --> 00:16.840] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.840 --> 00:18.440] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.440 --> 00:22.040] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.040 --> 00:26.800] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.800 --> 00:31.880] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:31.880 --> 00:34.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [00:34.560 --> 00:38.840] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:38.840 --> 00:42.400] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.400 --> 00:44.600] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.600 --> 00:47.680] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.680 --> 00:50.720] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:50.720 --> 00:54.360] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.360 --> 01:01.480] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, [01:01.480 --> 01:02.840] and R for religion. [01:02.840 --> 01:06.960] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:06.960 --> 01:08.420] assembly, and religion. [01:08.420 --> 01:10.760] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.760 --> 01:14.480] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.480 --> 01:18.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.000 --> 01:20.680] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.680 --> 01:22.640] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:22.640 --> 01:31.000] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.680] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.680 --> 01:38.120] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.120 --> 01:39.600] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.600 --> 01:43.520] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.520 --> 01:46.640] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.640 --> 01:48.240] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.240 --> 01:51.840] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.840 --> 01:56.600] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:56.600 --> 02:01.640] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.640 --> 02:04.360] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.360 --> 02:08.640] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.640 --> 02:12.180] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.180 --> 02:14.280] Start over with StartPage. [02:14.280 --> 02:20.120] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.120 --> 02:22.200] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.200 --> 02:26.680] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.680 --> 02:30.560] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.560 --> 02:31.560] Get it? [02:31.560 --> 02:32.560] Two arms? [02:32.560 --> 02:33.560] Bear hug? [02:33.560 --> 02:34.560] Bear arms? [02:34.560 --> 02:37.440] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.440 --> 02:38.680] when he said, [02:38.680 --> 02:43.640] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [02:43.640 --> 02:48.720] one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, but which historically [02:48.720 --> 02:50.480] has proved to always be possible. [02:50.480 --> 02:52.360] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.360 --> 03:21.120] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:22.960 --> 03:44.160] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [03:44.160 --> 04:02.000] one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, but which [04:02.000 --> 04:21.800] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now [04:21.800 --> 04:46.800] appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now [04:46.800 --> 05:02.200] appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears [05:02.200 --> 05:18.320] remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears [05:18.320 --> 05:25.740] remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but [05:25.740 --> 05:35.280] really arrogant and dismissive through this whole thing. I attended three Zoom [05:35.280 --> 05:42.720] hearings and he was not happy with any of them and then I didn't hear anything [05:42.720 --> 05:48.720] else from the court and the next thing I know I get pulled over and get noticed [05:48.720 --> 05:58.860] that my license has been suspended. Well, it turned out it was suspended because I [05:58.860 --> 06:10.260] missed two court hearings. So I contacted the city of Rome, Texas and wanted to know what [06:10.260 --> 06:20.580] the deal was and I filed a notice of change of plea to Nolo Contende and [06:20.580 --> 06:27.180] gave them a notice of intent to appeal and an affidavit for inability [06:27.180 --> 06:34.900] to pay and went into their little courtroom and the judge sat there and did [06:34.900 --> 06:42.060] his little deal until it got to me and when it got to me he informed me that [06:42.060 --> 06:48.660] this was a court of record and turned on had the clerk turn on the recording. [06:48.660 --> 06:54.740] Now he didn't do that for anybody else. Wow, how about that? I think he made a [06:54.740 --> 07:04.180] tactical error because he stated on the record that this was a court of record. [07:04.180 --> 07:19.340] So I want a copy of the recordings of all the other hearings I attended where [07:19.340 --> 07:28.540] he denied my challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, where he [07:28.540 --> 07:35.260] blew off everything. I filed criminal charges against his clerk and he refused [07:35.260 --> 07:41.660] to issue warrants. Oh, he just screwed up everything. But this time he was not [07:41.660 --> 07:51.180] quite so arrogant because he saw that I was appealing it out of his court and he [07:51.180 --> 07:57.980] went down. I had a affidavit of inability to pay that I got from a template from a [07:57.980 --> 08:04.340] friend of mine and it listed apparently all of the stuff they consider and he [08:04.340 --> 08:09.660] asked me about each one of them. Do I have know anybody I could borrow money [08:09.660 --> 08:18.700] from? Do I have anything I could sell? I don't think you're required to do any of [08:18.700 --> 08:31.020] that. But I told him no anyway and he granted me indigency status and so I [08:31.020 --> 08:38.860] didn't have to pay the $800 bond they had set. That failure to appear had a $600 [08:38.860 --> 08:49.140] bond all by itself. I asked the prosecutor to get me a copy of the [08:49.140 --> 08:58.260] email off the server where the clerk emailed me to notice me about the [08:58.260 --> 09:06.460] hearing. Well, she didn't have it. Surprise, surprise. Yeah, because she didn't email me. [09:06.460 --> 09:12.620] She mailed these. Well, in that case, I want to see the return receipt you [09:12.620 --> 09:22.180] received to prove that you mailed him. She said we don't have to do that. So you [09:22.180 --> 09:28.260] don't have to do that. All of the other hearings that I appeared at, you [09:28.260 --> 09:36.860] emailed notice to appear. But the two that I didn't appear at, you didn't email [09:36.860 --> 09:46.780] those. You snail mail on those. It's not looking very good. Yeah. How does this [09:46.780 --> 09:53.820] happen? I want to see all of the copies of all of the notices to appear that you [09:53.820 --> 09:59.620] have sent by mail. That's what I'm going to request. I'm going to do it under [09:59.620 --> 10:09.240] discovery when I get my appeal into the County Court. The judge in the County [10:09.240 --> 10:16.020] Court is someone I've known for 30 years. I wouldn't say we're friends. We are [10:16.020 --> 10:23.740] good acquaintances and we have a mutual respect for one another. And he knows I [10:23.740 --> 10:31.020] know the code, the law, better than he does. So it'll be interesting to see how [10:31.020 --> 10:35.980] this shakes out, because I'm going to ask him to issue warrants against the [10:35.980 --> 10:41.380] sheriff and the clerk. Of course. I'm sorry, I said sheriff and clerk. Against [10:41.380 --> 10:48.420] the judge and the clerk. And we'll see how that shakes out. And if he doesn't [10:48.420 --> 10:54.900] want to issue warrants, he's going to also know that you know he must. Yeah, he [10:54.900 --> 10:58.620] knows I'll file criminal charges against him because I've already done that to [10:58.620 --> 11:08.380] some other guys. The district judge, for one. The district attorney. He used to [11:08.380 --> 11:14.500] be the district attorney. And I never had opportunity or reason to file against [11:14.500 --> 11:21.100] him. We get a new one, and I have opportunity and reason to file against [11:21.100 --> 11:31.180] the new one. So I'll wind up putting the judge on the dime. And I'll ask him to [11:31.180 --> 11:39.740] do exactly what the law commands him to do. And I believe he will do it. I don't [11:39.740 --> 11:46.580] think he wants to get in a fight with me. You seriously think he's going to [11:46.580 --> 11:54.260] issue warrants for the other judge and his own clerk? I put a criminal affidavit [11:54.260 --> 11:59.580] in his hand, accusing the district judge of first degree felony aggravated [11:59.580 --> 12:06.620] assault. And he walked in and handed it to the foreman, the grand jury, and told [12:06.620 --> 12:14.100] him here, handle this, I'm out of here, and walked back out. He gave criminal [12:14.100 --> 12:21.620] charges. Smart man. Yes, he knew I knew what I was doing. And he didn't want to [12:21.620 --> 12:28.940] get in a fight with me. So I'm going to make this as easy for him as I can. I'm [12:28.940 --> 12:33.780] not going to dump everything on him. There are a couple of things I need a [12:33.780 --> 12:40.580] ruling on. And I'm going to put him on the dime to give me that ruling. I'm [12:40.580 --> 12:48.300] going to file a motion to dismiss for denial of speed trial, a motion to [12:48.300 --> 12:59.740] dismiss for lack of a indictment, and motion to dismiss for lack of a 16.17 [12:59.740 --> 13:11.860] order in the public record. See how this shakes out. And I'll tell him, and I [13:11.860 --> 13:17.180] really don't care how you rule. It doesn't matter. Because I really do need [13:17.180 --> 13:22.940] to get this to the appellate court. I need to force the appellate court to [13:22.940 --> 13:34.060] rule on these issues. We need good case law to fix this. And I have my criminal [13:34.060 --> 13:42.620] my civil suit against all the highest judges in Texas where I raised these [13:42.620 --> 13:51.660] issues and accused them of training magistrates in practices and procedure [13:51.660 --> 13:58.700] that are what's commonly practiced but violate all these issues. [13:58.700 --> 14:04.500] It seems kind of serendipitous that you would end up with the timing of these [14:04.500 --> 14:13.980] two issues coming together. Not exactly. I filed a change of plea and [14:13.980 --> 14:23.100] notice of appeal for this reason so that I would get it in front of this judge at [14:23.100 --> 14:30.780] this time. Because I wasn't finished fighting with the city yet. They hadn't [14:30.780 --> 14:35.580] screwed up everything that they could have, but I wanted this in front of this [14:35.580 --> 14:46.060] judge so I could move it past him into the Court of Appeals. So it's all [14:46.060 --> 14:55.180] working out pretty good. I got this ticket in March of last year. And they [14:55.180 --> 15:04.660] accused me of not appearing in July. So I'm gonna claim that was everything [15:04.660 --> 15:08.100] after that. They're going to claim against me, but I'm going to claim they [15:08.100 --> 15:15.940] deliberately did not notice me. That this is a pattern of behavior. And then I'm [15:15.940 --> 15:20.820] going to request discovery. I'm going to want to see all of their their notices to [15:20.820 --> 15:30.440] appeal that were mailed by this clerk and do that under discovery. They're [15:30.440 --> 15:36.500] trying to charge me with failure to appear, and that's a class B misdemeanor. [15:38.500 --> 15:49.620] And I'm maintaining that they conspired to false charges. Yeah. This is gonna be [15:49.620 --> 15:55.700] fun. And file criminally against the judge and the clerk and then sue them [15:55.700 --> 16:03.380] both. I've already got them where I can sue them in their individual capacities. [16:03.380 --> 16:10.940] Because some stuff, I'm gonna run out of time on this segment, but the clerk, when [16:10.940 --> 16:15.980] I first appeared, I gave her a bunch of motions and she didn't recognize that as [16:15.980 --> 16:23.940] an appearance. So she wound up giving me a notice of a failure to appear and [16:23.940 --> 16:27.820] reported it to the Department of Public Safety so I couldn't get my license [16:27.820 --> 16:35.620] renewed. And when I instructed her, she changed it right away, but it's too late. [16:35.620 --> 16:45.300] I've got the letter from the DPS refusing to renew my license. Oh, now they have a [16:45.300 --> 16:48.860] problem. Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, [16:48.860 --> 16:59.140] Wheel of Law Radio, a call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [16:59.140 --> 17:03.700] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or [17:03.700 --> 17:08.580] even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:08.580 --> 17:12.560] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors [17:12.560 --> 17:16.580] and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain [17:16.580 --> 17:21.100] English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do [17:21.100 --> 17:25.700] when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone [17:25.700 --> 17:29.500] calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [17:29.500 --> 17:34.380] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears [17:34.380 --> 17:38.820] proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal [17:38.820 --> 17:42.580] consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit [17:42.580 --> 17:47.080] ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email [17:47.080 --> 17:55.980] michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s [17:55.980 --> 18:00.900] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:00.900 --> 18:05.100] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's [18:05.100 --> 18:08.100] America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we the people are ever [18:08.100 --> 18:11.220] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our [18:11.220 --> 18:14.580] own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to [18:14.580 --> 18:17.460] place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, [18:17.460 --> 18:21.220] the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive [18:21.220 --> 18:24.740] opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [18:24.740 --> 18:28.220] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has [18:28.220 --> 18:31.060] put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help [18:31.060 --> 18:34.460] you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:34.460 --> 18:37.420] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to [18:37.420 --> 18:41.380] ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a [18:41.380 --> 18:44.300] copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the [18:44.300 --> 18:48.500] Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents [18:48.500 --> 18:51.620] and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the [18:51.620 --> 18:55.180] help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and [18:55.180 --> 19:00.180] together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [19:00.180 --> 19:08.180] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:30.180 --> 19:43.180] The world is spinning like it's out of control, on the edge of a hole, inside a deep dark [19:43.180 --> 19:53.180] hole. I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul. So I sit back and I watch [19:53.180 --> 20:09.180] the evidence unfold and I see justice is the goal. Yeah, justice is the goal. [20:09.180 --> 20:16.180] Sometimes we sail a little too far at sea and then we got to get back on course quickly [20:16.180 --> 20:23.180] so we go under heavy advisory from the man that came over. Okay, we are back. [20:23.180 --> 20:28.180] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio and we're going to our callers. [20:28.180 --> 20:36.180] We have what appears to be a first-time caller. This says David and 702. [20:36.180 --> 20:42.180] We looked that up. That's Denver. So if you're from Colorado, make sure the first [20:42.180 --> 20:50.180] name is right and make sure our state is right. [20:50.180 --> 20:57.180] Oh, I guess I should unmute you. Okay, we've got Chris from Colorado on the line and he's [20:57.180 --> 21:02.180] from the same area, but he's not the one we're talking to. If you're from Colorado, [21:02.180 --> 21:04.180] talk to us. [21:04.180 --> 21:06.180] Yes, it's David. Can you hear me? [21:06.180 --> 21:07.180] Yes, we can hear you. [21:07.180 --> 21:12.180] Hello? Okay, I'm from Kansas basically. I have a Colorado number. [21:12.180 --> 21:17.180] Oh, okay. David from Kansas. [21:17.180 --> 21:25.180] I have a question for you guys. I have my own case going. When you challenge, you know, [21:25.180 --> 21:30.180] you're in court, you're standing there, how do you, because your motion to dismiss is [21:30.180 --> 21:37.180] only as good as you can defend it. Is that correct? Would that be a correct statement? [21:37.180 --> 21:41.180] Wait a minute. Say that again. It's only as good as what? [21:41.180 --> 21:47.180] Your motion to dismiss that you write can be completely perfect, but unless you can [21:47.180 --> 21:53.180] defend it, it's not as good. Would that be like a correct way to put it? [21:53.180 --> 21:56.180] No, that's not okay. [21:56.180 --> 22:01.180] Sometimes a judge will ask you to go ahead, when you've got a motion in, you go to the [22:01.180 --> 22:08.180] motions hearing and the judge will ask you about it. Like, it's almost like trying to [22:08.180 --> 22:12.180] feel you out and see if you really know what it was you wrote and what it means and so [22:12.180 --> 22:16.180] forth, but you don't have to stand there and recite everything. You can if you want [22:16.180 --> 22:20.180] to. You could read it off or you can just say, well, Your Honor, I'd like to stand [22:20.180 --> 22:25.180] on my pleadings. So everything that you've written there, you carefully crafted it. [22:25.180 --> 22:29.180] You spent the time to put your motion together the way you want to say it, exactly [22:29.180 --> 22:36.180] right. And once you're done, you can just say that you stand on your pleadings and [22:36.180 --> 22:39.180] there it is. [22:39.180 --> 22:47.180] And I suggest that if you are not a learned counsel and experienced attorney, that you [22:47.180 --> 22:56.180] object to oral argument as is patently unfair for a pro se and move the court to make its [22:56.180 --> 23:03.180] determinations on the pleadings. And I did what I, you know, I do this a lot, so I'm [23:03.180 --> 23:09.180] pretty comfortable talking to the judge. But I did what I suggest other people do. The [23:09.180 --> 23:14.180] judge said he wanted me to argue the pleadings, so I started reading it. He said, Mr. [23:14.180 --> 23:19.180] Kelton, you're just reading the pleading. Yes, I am. And if you want me to keep reading [23:19.180 --> 23:25.180] the pleading, I'll keep reading the pleading. But if you want me to bandy words with this [23:25.180 --> 23:31.180] prosecutor over here, that's not going to happen. I'm going to stand on my pleadings. [23:31.180 --> 23:36.180] And the judge was frustrated, but he didn't ask me to continue reading the pleading. So [23:36.180 --> 23:43.180] it's not what you say in court that's most important. It's what's in your document that [23:43.180 --> 23:54.180] matters. Okay. And when you're in there and you say, just for an example, you're wanting [23:54.180 --> 23:59.180] to stand on your pleadings and you're asking them for something, you know, because we want [23:59.180 --> 24:06.180] to make them prove their claim, how do we say, like, can you please show me the record [24:06.180 --> 24:12.180] with the evidence that they have standing for the subject matter jurisdiction, basically? [24:12.180 --> 24:19.180] Well, you should already have anything they want to present to the court should already [24:19.180 --> 24:26.180] be presented to the court and to you. You're supposed to get a copy of it prior. [24:26.180 --> 24:33.180] Okay. Otherwise, you have trial by ambush. You need to be able to see all of this stuff [24:33.180 --> 24:41.180] before you come into court so you can formulate your objections and formulate briefs in support [24:41.180 --> 24:48.180] of your position. Okay. That helps. Thank you. I appreciate it. I'm very learned. I've [24:48.180 --> 24:53.180] got jurisdictionary.com and, and I've listened to Brett all through his speeding tickets. [24:53.180 --> 24:57.180] So I appreciate you guys' help and I'll let you guys go to the next call. I just wanted [24:57.180 --> 25:05.180] to call in and say hello and ask one question. Okay. Don't be a stranger. And it happens [25:05.180 --> 25:12.180] that we have another calling behind you and his area code is also seven two zero. Well, [25:12.180 --> 25:18.180] you'll see in your chat room. I'm, I'm king man. Just let you know. So thank you. Okay. [25:18.180 --> 25:25.180] Thank you, David. Okay. Now we're going to go to Chris in Colorado. Hello, Chris. What [25:25.180 --> 25:32.180] do you have for us today? Hello, gentlemen. Um, I hope we have another, just a quick question [25:32.180 --> 25:39.180] about discovery. I'm, I'm hashing through all this and, um, I read through, let's see, [25:39.180 --> 25:45.180] where do I start? Um, the subpoena that I, that I submitted. Okay. I called you guys [25:45.180 --> 25:50.180] a week or two ago and I said that the, uh, insurance company responded and asked for [25:50.180 --> 25:53.180] two more weeks or asked for another week on top of the week that was left. And then all [25:53.180 --> 25:58.180] of a sudden the same day they got back to me and said, nevermind. Well, I went through [25:58.180 --> 26:03.180] all their material and the reason they went, nevermind is because they, they threw out [26:03.180 --> 26:13.180] this blanket, um, firm that falls in with, uh, attorney client privilege, insurer insurer [26:13.180 --> 26:21.180] privilege. And now there's this thing called work product privilege. So the, uh, insurance [26:21.180 --> 26:26.680] company is not using any, any, any attorney client privilege, but they are using insured [26:26.680 --> 26:32.220] insured privilege. And now this thing called work product protection. And it's basically [26:32.220 --> 26:36.820] all the same BS. They, they're just stating that, that, you know, everything they're, [26:36.820 --> 26:42.380] they're using is protected, but the courts are very clear. The only way any of this stuff [26:42.380 --> 26:48.100] is protected as if it was for some preparation for litigation or advice from a lawyer to [26:48.100 --> 26:56.020] and from anybody within the parties. Um, so I'm just, I guess I'm frustrated. I'm not [26:56.020 --> 27:02.180] sure how to just smack these people hard. They're playing. I just, I'm baffled by the, [27:02.180 --> 27:08.100] the almost childness of, of some of these lawyers and how the courts allow them to get [27:08.100 --> 27:14.680] away with this. Why would a judge who's gone to the system themselves just allow this type [27:14.680 --> 27:19.460] of language and why does it continue? I guess is a question of mine. [27:19.460 --> 27:28.540] Well, they all have their snouts in the same trough. You are not a lawyer, so you're not [27:28.540 --> 27:37.660] part of their fraternity. All of these judges are also lawyers. So, you know, I tell people [27:37.660 --> 27:45.400] that when you go into court, it's like sitting down at a four sided chessboard. You have [27:45.400 --> 27:52.040] your, you sit down and you have your attorney to your right, opposing counsel to your left, [27:52.040 --> 27:58.740] the judge across from you. Well, you have a relationship with your attorney and your [27:58.740 --> 28:04.540] attorney has a relationship with opposing counsel and both attorneys have a relationship [28:04.540 --> 28:11.000] with the judge. It's all about relationships. If you're going to win your case, you need [28:11.000 --> 28:20.020] to get inside these relationships. You're in there without counsel. So nobody has a [28:20.020 --> 28:29.340] relationship with you. You're an outsider. So this is a three sided chessboard. You should [28:29.340 --> 28:38.280] think of it that way. How, how do you play the lawyers against the judge and the judge [28:38.280 --> 28:48.940] against the lawyers? Well, one way is to bar grieve the lawyers. And then when the judge [28:48.940 --> 28:54.940] rules in favor of the lawyers arbitrarily or capriciously, you file a judicial conduct [28:54.940 --> 29:03.460] complaint against him. Now judges don't get many judicial conduct complaints against them [29:03.460 --> 29:12.500] because lawyers don't dare do that or they'll get squashed. The judges will hammer them [29:12.500 --> 29:16.500] big time and they know it. So they tend to leave the judges alone. They let the judge [29:16.500 --> 29:24.600] do pretty much whatever they want to. Then they get a pro se in there. A pro se can hammer [29:24.600 --> 29:29.340] the judge all he wants to. Now you may think, okay, if I'm mean to the judge, the judge [29:29.340 --> 29:38.420] is likely to be mean to you. That's naive. You have to assume the judge is going to rule [29:38.420 --> 29:50.260] against you out of hand at every turn. So be the citizen in the Republic. Spank them [29:50.260 --> 29:58.060] all. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the group of La Radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. [29:58.060 --> 30:06.100] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively [30:06.100 --> 30:10.220] affected our health? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new [30:10.220 --> 30:16.300] findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. Privacy is under [30:16.300 --> 30:21.060] attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your [30:21.060 --> 30:26.980] privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. [30:26.980 --> 30:33.300] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [30:33.300 --> 30:37.580] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:37.580 --> 30:45.260] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Cell phones emit [30:45.260 --> 30:49.980] radio frequency energy. It's a fact. But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this [30:49.980 --> 30:54.340] kind of radiation near your head has been disputed. Some have blamed it for brain tumors [30:54.340 --> 30:58.780] while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. Well, now the Journal of the American [30:58.780 --> 31:03.620] Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry. A study of [31:03.620 --> 31:08.460] 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell [31:08.460 --> 31:12.900] phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. While researchers aren't sure whether [31:12.900 --> 31:18.020] this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances. I always keep the phone far from [31:18.020 --> 31:23.140] my body and I use a corded headset. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information [31:23.140 --> 31:24.740] at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:53.140 --> 32:06.100] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [32:06.100 --> 32:11.580] Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time [32:11.580 --> 32:17.020] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [32:17.020 --> 32:22.980] 2.15. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [32:22.980 --> 32:27.860] tightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in [32:27.860 --> 32:32.820] the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [32:32.820 --> 32:37.460] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [32:37.460 --> 32:42.340] and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to [32:42.340 --> 32:47.540] all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves [32:47.540 --> 32:52.780] more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on [32:52.780 --> 32:58.860] LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies [32:58.860 --> 33:26.100] of the Scriptures. [33:28.860 --> 33:47.500] I need a prosecutor to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked leader, you see. Them murderers [33:47.500 --> 33:52.940] are liars, them tell me. Them are liars, they tell sweet stories. Me not believe me, say [33:52.940 --> 33:58.740] what them tell me. 3% of America vote for Bushy. So how the hell he get the presidency? [33:58.740 --> 34:04.740] That's why me have a warrant for he. Everybody listen carefully. Listen to the words of the [34:04.740 --> 34:15.740] three shoes Posse. Citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy. Have a warrant for Nick Cheney. Citizens [34:15.740 --> 34:26.940] arrest Mr. Bushy. Have a warrant for Nick Cheney. Well we not forget Rumsfield, warrant [34:26.940 --> 34:32.540] for him. I'll be cheney, warrant for him. Fight about the citizens in the country. Them [34:32.540 --> 34:38.660] get in so bad. Okay, howdy, howdy. We are back. Randy Kelcom, Brett Fountain, Root [34:38.660 --> 34:49.100] of Law Radio on this, the 16th day of June 2023. And we're talking to Chris in Colorado. [34:49.100 --> 34:55.540] We have our phone lines open. So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. Okay [34:55.540 --> 35:07.340] Chris. Yeah, they're always screw around with discovery. They always make the judge [35:07.340 --> 35:19.860] order discovery, so expect that. And then beat them up, you can do that. Lawyers can't. [35:19.860 --> 35:29.260] The bar grieve the lawyer for misrepresenting the truth about the discovery to the court. [35:29.260 --> 35:36.540] And the bar is not going to do anything about it, especially in Colorado. I talked to the [35:36.540 --> 35:42.300] state bar association and asked them where to file a bar grievance. Oh, you need to file [35:42.300 --> 35:54.100] that with us. Liar, liar, pants on fire. The bar association themselves? Yeah. In Colorado, [35:54.100 --> 35:59.220] you don't file bar grievances with the bar association. You file them with the Colorado [35:59.220 --> 36:09.900] Supreme Court. They lied to me. You should never ask a lawyer a question you don't already [36:09.900 --> 36:18.260] know the answer to. And I had fun bar grieving the lawyers, state bar association lawyers [36:18.260 --> 36:29.300] for lying to me. There you go. Okay, are you there, Chris? They were ready to just go ahead [36:29.300 --> 36:38.620] and, hey, we'll throw that in the trash for you. Yeah. Well, now I'm in two states at [36:38.620 --> 36:44.700] this point. Now Illinois is where the original suit is. And I've got plenty of lawyers to [36:44.700 --> 36:51.900] bar grieve there, but then we got this new guy is from Minnesota. And so he's answering [36:51.900 --> 36:58.500] for the insurance company. I'll look up the Minnesota rules, but I'm pretty sure he's [36:58.500 --> 37:04.100] violating some stuff there, but he's also violating federal rules across borders for [37:04.100 --> 37:18.300] a suit that he got subpoena for in Illinois. Is he authorized to practice in Illinois? [37:18.300 --> 37:26.020] I don't think so, but I don't know that for sure. He's just answering for the insurance [37:26.020 --> 37:31.340] company. Well, okay, you sued the insurance company, so you will have sued them either [37:31.340 --> 37:39.060] in the Fed or in Minnesota. No, I sued, I originally did sue the insurance company, [37:39.060 --> 37:44.220] but I dismissed them and then I refiled their, they don't know they're going to get sued [37:44.220 --> 37:48.340] yet. So this doesn't have anything to do with that separate suit. I'm going to file that. [37:48.340 --> 37:52.140] I'm waiting to, I'm waiting to serve them. I should say that it's already been filed, [37:52.140 --> 37:57.700] but he's, his title is claims counsel. Okay. So he's a lawyer for the, for the insurance [37:57.700 --> 38:07.220] company, but I'm assuming he'll be, he'll be, he'll be licensed in Minnesota. [38:07.220 --> 38:13.060] Now you have a lawsuit in Illinois. Right. But that's only, it's against their insurer, [38:13.060 --> 38:23.260] the tow company. And you don't, okay. But if he, is he in representing the insurance [38:23.260 --> 38:30.520] company's interest in this case? No, the insurance company had to hire a separate firm [38:30.520 --> 38:34.580] in Illinois because they're not, they're not, they're, they're businesses, you know, they're [38:34.580 --> 38:40.220] outside of, they're in Minnesota. They're only licensed to sell insurance policies in [38:40.220 --> 38:47.740] Illinois. That's it. So they don't have any council that, that works for them in Illinois. [38:47.740 --> 38:54.300] That's where I was getting to. So if they have a Minnesota lawyer, he couldn't represent [38:54.300 --> 39:00.340] them in Illinois. So this is a Minnesota lawyer in Minnesota. [39:00.340 --> 39:05.500] Yeah. Answering a subpoena from Illinois federal court. [39:05.500 --> 39:14.300] Oh, is he licensed to practice in the federal court? [39:14.300 --> 39:21.580] I don't know. He's the one who answered the subpoena that I sent. So that's all. [39:21.580 --> 39:26.380] Can he answer a subpoena in a federal court if he's not authorized to practice in a federal [39:26.380 --> 39:27.380] court? [39:27.380 --> 39:34.940] Well, it'd be like me subpoenaing, you know, anybody who's not a lawyer. If I, if I subpoena [39:34.940 --> 39:40.380] a business, they're going to answer it. Um, but since... [39:40.380 --> 39:47.420] Yeah, but it depends, how they answer depends on whether, whether it's a state subpoena [39:47.420 --> 39:54.700] or a federal subpoena. Now a private party can answer, like the private, if it was an [39:54.700 --> 40:03.140] individual, but this is an insurance company and the executives of the insurance company [40:03.140 --> 40:09.380] can't answer. They have to hire counsel. And counselor is, counsel is representing the [40:09.380 --> 40:16.060] insurance company's interest in a federal suit. This guy has to be licensed for practicing [40:16.060 --> 40:17.060] the Fed. [40:17.060 --> 40:21.940] Well, he could be. He could be. [40:21.940 --> 40:25.780] It would be a good question to ask. [40:25.780 --> 40:32.180] Yeah. Because he didn't answer it like a normal civilian would. He answered it as if it's [40:32.180 --> 40:38.500] a brief from, you know, emotion and opposition to compel. Like he's already preparing for [40:38.500 --> 40:42.180] that and you can read, you can see it. [40:42.180 --> 40:49.180] And what you said earlier, I had a thought. They always give the new attorneys the pro [40:49.180 --> 40:59.660] se. So it may be the new attorney is trying to show his behind and demonstrate to his [40:59.660 --> 41:08.900] bosses how valuable he is to them. So Bargrieve. [41:08.900 --> 41:15.020] Well, I plan to, and I plan to Bargrieve his bosses that he mentioned in here too, or some [41:15.020 --> 41:22.060] other people he mentioned in here. Oh, nevermind. Yeah. He, these are from, these are people [41:22.060 --> 41:25.540] from previous who are going to get Bargrieve, but he just reminded me who they were. These [41:25.540 --> 41:29.820] were, these were other councils for that insurance company. [41:29.820 --> 41:33.700] But the other part that's funny is I emailed him today and I just let him know that your [41:33.700 --> 41:38.420] response is deficient. I expect an expansion on your, on your response. Cause I'm not playing [41:38.420 --> 41:42.820] that basically pointed out. This is, this is a common tactic that you dumb, some lawyers [41:42.820 --> 41:49.500] use and I already know that I read the case. And so I'd like you to expand before you get [41:49.500 --> 41:54.940] emotion and compel. And I get this automatic reply and it says, I will be out from June [41:54.940 --> 42:02.140] 8th till the 18th. And the letter in the email that he sent me was on the 7th stating that [42:02.140 --> 42:07.620] I needed an extra two weeks. And then the day before he takes off on vacation, he just [42:07.620 --> 42:14.860] goes and sends me this BS. So, I mean, these guys are just, they're really sad, you know? [42:14.860 --> 42:20.300] I mean, it's just really sad. I guess that was that that's because lawyers generally [42:20.300 --> 42:26.900] don't beat up lawyers. The client is sitting back there and they wouldn't like this stuff, [42:26.900 --> 42:32.180] but the lawyers don't care. The lawyers all have their snouts in the same trough. [42:32.180 --> 42:37.860] The more billable hours, the more delay that's the better for their pocket. [42:37.860 --> 42:46.380] And then when a pro se comes along, they figure you're ignorant and they can do anything you [42:46.380 --> 42:55.260] want to to you. The worst thing for them is a knowledgeable pro se. Because now all of [42:55.260 --> 42:59.580] a sudden they're getting their butt, they give it to the newest lawyer in the place [42:59.580 --> 43:07.580] who's most likely to screw up the most. And like I got one where I filed a petition for [43:07.580 --> 43:14.860] declaratory judgment and Lock Lord, one of the biggest law firms in the country responded. [43:14.860 --> 43:24.500] And the guy responded with a 12B6. Oops. The whole purpose of declaratory judgment was [43:24.500 --> 43:37.100] to avoid a 12B6. The judge granted the 12B6 and dismissed with prejudice. So I filed criminal [43:37.100 --> 43:43.620] charges against the judge with a special agent in charge of the Dallas FBI. [43:43.620 --> 43:53.100] Oh, that was so much fun. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio. I'll call in [43:53.100 --> 44:00.660] number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [44:00.660 --> 44:05.260] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [44:05.260 --> 44:09.840] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time [44:09.840 --> 44:16.060] we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [44:16.060 --> 44:21.220] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [44:21.220 --> 44:27.860] mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests [44:27.860 --> 44:32.860] to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young [44:32.860 --> 44:39.220] Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many [44:39.220 --> 44:46.060] others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [44:46.060 --> 44:52.020] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:52.020 --> 44:57.260] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [44:57.260 --> 45:00.260] increase your income. Order now. [45:00.260 --> 45:07.260] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary. [45:07.260 --> 45:14.260] The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by [45:14.260 --> 45:19.940] step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have [45:19.940 --> 45:26.220] a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, [45:26.220 --> 45:33.220] and now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [45:33.220 --> 45:39.020] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.020 --> 45:44.540] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [45:44.540 --> 45:51.540] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [45:51.540 --> 46:04.340] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:04.340 --> 46:27.540] Whoa whoa... whoa whoa... yeah... cause I always... I must be careful what I'm wishing [46:27.540 --> 46:35.300] what i'm wishing for when i'm hungry i like to know just what i'm fishing for [46:35.300 --> 46:44.820] i ain't asking for much i ain't trying to be no glutton i'm just here making my living pushing buttons [46:44.820 --> 46:55.780] i get my message out to anyone in shot and distance i vote for bravery okay [46:55.780 --> 47:02.340] we are back randy kelton brett fountain radio talking to chris in colorado chris you're in a [47:02.340 --> 47:07.860] good position nothing worse than a knowledgeable pro se [47:07.860 --> 47:14.820] day and one one that's at least at least a little bit ruthless [47:17.940 --> 47:25.540] yeah i'm i'm i'm way past patient i'm wait i'm patient but i'm way past timidness that's for [47:25.540 --> 47:32.420] sure i mean i guess the word's not getting around but the thing is is that's interesting is that they [47:32.980 --> 47:37.140] this is i'm learning the hard way or i'm learning the way there's only one way to learn [47:37.140 --> 47:44.820] is going through this is that this is how it works and no wonder it's messed up when you have [47:46.020 --> 47:52.740] judges who tolerate this the only reason that lawyers are continuing to throw the entire kitchen [47:52.740 --> 47:59.700] sink at the courts is because the judges allow it they don't reprimand enough so why why are [47:59.700 --> 48:04.980] the lawyers afraid of the judge if the judge doesn't do anything like in situations like this [48:04.980 --> 48:10.500] i mean i'm reading the what's amazing is that the the case law is pretty clear when you get to the [48:10.500 --> 48:14.820] appellate courts and you get to the supreme court the judges up there are no nonsense but they don't [48:14.820 --> 48:20.820] have any they don't have any direct you know engagement with the lower judges so i'm trying [48:20.820 --> 48:26.340] to understand how this this game works a little better and and that's my i guess that's my my [48:26.340 --> 48:35.140] inquiry tonight so i think they quoted a case law which is it's a great case it's um they were used [48:35.140 --> 48:41.300] that they missed they misdirected it thinking i guess i wouldn't read it but um you know it's not [48:41.300 --> 48:48.100] how it works we got to read this stuff anyway so they have a case of of um higher or prior [48:48.100 --> 48:55.300] prior versus target corp and this is in illinois and they misquoted um they misquoted a reference [48:55.300 --> 49:00.340] from that case trying to get to to argue that they have attorney-client privilege and that that [49:00.340 --> 49:06.340] extends directly to insured insured privilege but all throughout that case it's amazing they also [49:06.340 --> 49:13.220] talk about um this work at this work doctrine so there's those three categories and so it's very [49:13.220 --> 49:21.300] clear from what this this this court is saying that you don't get carte blanche to just use this to [49:21.300 --> 49:32.340] to hide everything they actually say that they say the wording is um what is it all encompassing [49:32.340 --> 49:38.980] shroud of secrecy that's the term the term and so they you know they they initiate this work product [49:38.980 --> 49:43.780] dark uh work product doctrine uh privilege the their attorney-client privilege and then and then [49:43.780 --> 49:47.700] the uh insured insured privilege there's probably other privileges but those are three that i'm [49:47.700 --> 49:53.220] working with and if you invoke those then you know obviously you can you can withhold documentation [49:53.220 --> 49:58.340] but you have to be very very specific and so this case is basically beating up target because target [49:58.340 --> 50:05.860] is using these these really you know disrespectful uh client privilege claims and then they appealed [50:05.860 --> 50:09.940] it and this is the appellate court saying yeah we we basically are backing up the lower courts [50:09.940 --> 50:18.340] because you don't get to do this and so i guess i my question is is if if is this just how it works [50:18.340 --> 50:25.220] is it just always messy and there's not enough reprimand for for lawyers to act up and up whereas [50:25.220 --> 50:30.980] as a pro se if we if we squeak the wrong way because we can't disrespect the courts with these [50:30.980 --> 50:34.580] games that'll really ignore them i guess that's what i'm saying it's like a double standard [50:34.580 --> 50:39.780] court they tolerate this even though it annoys them but they they would get really frustrated [50:39.780 --> 50:45.140] if a pro se played the same game is that sound accurate kind of what you were talking to before [50:45.140 --> 50:54.900] i'm not in that club i'm not sure i think it depends on the judge because i have seen judges [50:54.900 --> 51:04.980] is sit there and be incredibly patient uh this is a woman that just went to jail for five years over [51:04.980 --> 51:12.820] this patriot mythology stuff um i was in court with bonnie and it was a contempt hearing [51:14.180 --> 51:20.580] and the judge was doing everything she could to get bonnie to give her a reason not to hold her [51:20.580 --> 51:28.020] in contempt and i was amazed at how patient the judge was clearly she was frustrated [51:28.980 --> 51:35.860] and my bonnie kept doing this patriot stuff you know this is not me i'm not the all caps [51:36.660 --> 51:42.580] and on and on and on and the judge was struggling after about 10 minutes i couldn't tolerate it [51:42.580 --> 51:52.020] anymore i got up walked out of the the courtroom so i've seen judges be really patient and then [51:52.020 --> 52:01.780] i've seen judges be very impatient so i guess there's a spectrum i've seen both too and it's [52:01.780 --> 52:08.500] rare to see them come down hard on an attorney in front of a pro se but i did see that happen too [52:08.500 --> 52:18.500] once well that's so i've seen it once here too it wasn't super hard they deserve sanctions for [52:18.500 --> 52:22.020] everything they've done but you know she never hit she never said anything about sanctions she [52:22.020 --> 52:28.740] just slapped them and you should you should ask for sanctions and get the judge to deny them [52:28.740 --> 52:38.900] then because the idea of sanctions terrifies them and you're asking for sanctions they're [52:38.900 --> 52:41.860] going to be terrified until the judge denies your sanctions [52:44.500 --> 52:54.260] so in every opportunity ask for sanctions i asked in this recent answer to the opposition to compel [52:54.260 --> 52:59.540] i didn't ask for them but i said i asked the court i said i basically said the court should consider [52:59.540 --> 53:06.180] sanctions for the continued disregard and i also did not ask respectfully for the court to [53:07.300 --> 53:13.220] consider the motion i asked the court i moved the court to enforce the motion i'm getting tired of [53:13.220 --> 53:19.460] being so nicey-nicey you know and using that language when it's very clear that the opposing [53:19.460 --> 53:25.140] party even even as the seasoned attorneys are just messing with the court just seeing if the [53:25.140 --> 53:30.020] court's not looking it's like the dog you know i'm taking care taking care of my my landlord's dogs [53:30.020 --> 53:34.100] and if i'm not looking and that door is cracked they're out the side of the door running as fast [53:34.100 --> 53:39.780] as they can just to do it because it's fun you know and it's it's cute in the moment except when [53:39.780 --> 53:44.820] i got to get downtown you know so it's just it's that type of mentality just seeing if the court's [53:44.820 --> 53:52.980] going to miss it and if they can squeak by and i guess i'm i i expect adults who are who are [53:52.980 --> 53:57.780] attorneys to act a little more respectful to the court and to the parties instead of playing this [53:57.780 --> 54:02.260] juvenile stuff this is something that you know a teenager would do fresh out of high school [54:02.260 --> 54:07.220] oh i got these new tools i'm gonna see what i can get away with that should be in your motion [54:07.220 --> 54:12.180] okay yeah that sounds really well put [54:13.700 --> 54:21.700] yeah that should that language should be in your motion and it sounds good too that you're not [54:22.260 --> 54:27.860] picking on them for um the part that you're highlighting is that they're [54:27.860 --> 54:29.940] trying to pull the wool over the court's eyes [54:29.940 --> 54:37.060] yes yeah i mean they're they're they're quoting court they're quoting case law that [54:37.060 --> 54:41.700] i mean thank god it's not very long it's only 11 pages but they're quoting case law that [54:41.700 --> 54:47.380] forces the judge to go through and see if it's right instead of actually saying okay here's what [54:47.380 --> 54:54.500] we think it is they know down well it's not what it is so this is what i think i'm seeing that [54:54.500 --> 55:01.300] needs to get a request for sanctions the worst thing a lawyer can do is misquote case law [55:02.820 --> 55:09.380] the second worst thing they can do is miss something but misapplying case law is the worst [55:10.020 --> 55:11.300] foo-pah they can make [55:13.780 --> 55:16.260] so that should be you should ask for sanctions for that [55:19.220 --> 55:22.100] well i hinted at it i definitely hinted at it um [55:22.100 --> 55:27.620] um i should have asked for it i guess i guess it's my first time asking for it i'm going to [55:27.620 --> 55:31.700] start asking for it from here on out actually i'm going to ask for sanctions against the [55:31.700 --> 55:36.420] insurance company for also i guess the insurance company's obviously talking to defense in illinois [55:37.220 --> 55:41.620] because the language is similar so they're coming up with a similar strategy on their own [55:42.420 --> 55:48.740] and uh what's fascinating is they're denying me access to communications i didn't realize i was [55:48.740 --> 55:52.500] going to turn into this but they're denying me access to communications before i even filed a [55:52.500 --> 56:00.180] lawsuit and they won't let me see any of those emails between the insured and the insurer they [56:00.180 --> 56:05.380] won't let me see anything and that's not protected under any of their their privilege yet they're [56:05.380 --> 56:10.260] they're forcing that they're trying to stuff that down the course the court's mouth and and make [56:10.260 --> 56:14.020] them swallow it and think that that you know enough and they're putting a lot of pressure on [56:14.020 --> 56:18.180] that which is interesting they do not want me seeing what's in those communications which makes [56:18.180 --> 56:26.740] me want to see them even more there's probably something pretty damning in there and you know [56:26.740 --> 56:31.860] what that's exactly what i put in the motion the only reason they would be fighting this hard is [56:31.860 --> 56:38.020] because there's something damning i use that exact word and that's why i said i i uh i want i asked [56:38.020 --> 56:42.020] the court to seriously consider what's being hit in those emails and the force and to order them to [56:42.020 --> 56:50.500] be uh uh produced for review so yeah it's going to get interesting because i i thought we would [56:50.500 --> 56:56.020] just have some basic stuff behind them but they're one of the attorneys that the that the the federal [56:56.020 --> 57:01.300] hibler helped us we get you get access to a federal attorney for about 45 minutes one of them said [57:01.300 --> 57:07.140] they probably conspired and um i mean he says they obviously conspired but you have to have some type [57:07.140 --> 57:14.980] of evidence that shows that and i said i bet it's in those emails almost certainly in those emails [57:16.180 --> 57:18.500] and the judge will probably know that [57:22.500 --> 57:30.340] okay and he's not going to want to embarrass these lawyers because they all got their snouts in the [57:30.340 --> 57:41.380] same trough they played golf together on the weekends well this is a female magistrate she's [57:41.380 --> 57:51.060] a she's no nonsense but i think you're right i think she comes from the same you know paternity [57:51.060 --> 57:59.060] so to speak so if she's not going to embarrass them then what what might happen well it'll [57:59.060 --> 58:05.060] scare them in any case although she might if you if they annoy her enough [58:09.460 --> 58:16.180] but it's that's kind of something kind of hard to beat because they are one fraternity so [58:16.820 --> 58:23.060] finally judicial conduct complained against the judge for protecting these lawyers that's [58:23.060 --> 58:35.380] going to not make her happy good point yeah okay you can do that the these lawyers that there's [58:35.380 --> 58:42.980] tactics they can't use hang on randy kelton brett fountain wheel of law radio call in number five [58:42.980 --> 58:48.500] one two six four six nineteen eighty four we've got one slot on the board but we'll be right back [58:48.500 --> 58:54.740] back would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with god bibles for [58:54.740 --> 59:00.740] america is offering a free study bible and a set of free christian books that can really help [59:00.740 --> 59:05.940] the new testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study bibles available today [59:05.940 --> 59:10.500] it's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to [59:10.500 --> 59:16.820] know god and to know the meaning of life the free books are a three volume set called basic elements [59:16.820 --> 59:22.180] of the christian life chapter by chapter basic elements of the christian life clearly presents [59:22.180 --> 59:28.900] god's plan of salvation growing in christ and how to build up the church to order your free new [59:28.900 --> 59:35.620] testament recovery version and basic elements of the christian life call bibles for america toll [59:35.620 --> 59:53.300] free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org live free speech radio logos [59:53.300 --> 01:00:05.780] radio network.com the bill of rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution they [01:00:05.780 --> 01:00:10.820] guarantee the specific freedoms americans should know and protect our liberty depends on it i'm [01:00:10.820 --> 01:00:15.140] dr katherine albrecht and i'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your [01:00:15.140 --> 01:00:21.460] constitutional rights privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get [01:00:21.460 --> 01:00:27.460] it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so [01:00:27.460 --> 01:00:33.620] protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's [01:00:33.620 --> 01:00:39.220] worth hanging on to this public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com the private [01:00:39.220 --> 01:00:46.900] search engine alternative to google yahoo and bing start over with startpage imagine your mom [01:00:46.900 --> 01:00:52.500] and dad are getting ready for bed they pull back the covers and find a third party there he announces [01:00:52.500 --> 01:00:56.660] i'm with the military and i'm sleeping here tonight that shocking image of a third party [01:00:56.660 --> 01:01:01.220] in my parents bed reminds me what the third amendment was designed to prevent it protects [01:01:01.220 --> 01:01:05.620] us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers a common demand in the days of our [01:01:05.620 --> 01:01:11.380] founding fathers third party third amendment get it so if you answer a knock at your door and guys [01:01:11.380 --> 01:01:16.020] and fatigues demand lodging tell them to dust off their copy of the bill of rights and reread the [01:01:16.020 --> 01:01:21.300] third amendment i'm dr katherine albrecht more news and information at katherinealbrecht.com [01:01:31.780 --> 01:01:35.460] the bill of rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution [01:01:35.460 --> 01:01:38.900] they guarantee the specific freedoms americans should know and protect [01:01:38.900 --> 01:01:42.980] our liberty depends on it i'm dr katherine albrecht and i'll be right back with an [01:01:42.980 --> 01:01:48.820] unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights privacy is under attack [01:01:48.820 --> 01:01:54.260] when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again and once your privacy is gone [01:01:54.260 --> 01:02:00.180] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect your rights say no to surveillance [01:02:00.180 --> 01:02:05.940] and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this public service [01:02:05.940 --> 01:02:11.220] announcement is brought to you by startpage.com the private search engine alternative to google [01:02:11.220 --> 01:02:19.060] yahoo and bing start over with startpage imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars [01:02:19.060 --> 01:02:24.180] a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles that imagery reminds me that the fourth amendment [01:02:24.180 --> 01:02:29.380] guarantees americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure fourth amendment four eyes [01:02:29.380 --> 01:02:34.100] staring at you get it unfortunately the government is trampling our fourth amendment rights in the [01:02:34.100 --> 01:02:40.020] name of security case in point tsa airport scanners that peer under your clothing when [01:02:40.020 --> 01:02:44.260] government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause i say it's [01:02:44.260 --> 01:02:49.060] time to sound the constitutional alarm bells join me in asking our representatives to dust [01:02:49.060 --> 01:02:54.580] off the bill of rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the fourth i'm dr katherine [01:02:54.580 --> 01:03:11.060] albrecht more news and information at katherinealbrecht.com [01:03:24.740 --> 01:03:45.940] okay we are back randy kelton rep fount rule of law radio on this friday the 16th day of june 2023 [01:03:45.940 --> 01:03:53.700] and we're talking to chris in colorado we have a full board right now we have two first time callers [01:03:54.580 --> 01:03:57.540] so we will get to everybody okay chris [01:03:59.860 --> 01:04:03.380] where were we we were beating up the judge [01:04:06.980 --> 01:04:11.940] you're the pro se and they expect you to be a chomp [01:04:11.940 --> 01:04:22.660] uh but you have the capacity to be a jerk jerk is so much better nobody can mess with the judge [01:04:23.620 --> 01:04:31.620] except the pro se and that gives you powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal attorneys [01:04:32.580 --> 01:04:37.460] and you always have to assume that the judge is going to rule against you out of hand at every [01:04:37.460 --> 01:04:48.020] turn no matter what so don't worry about it get the judge to do the dumbest thing she can [01:04:49.620 --> 01:04:57.620] because she's you know she's on their side she's way and weighted against the you and toward them [01:04:57.620 --> 01:05:07.460] so a couple complaints against her like for instance for allowing this improper behavior [01:05:07.460 --> 01:05:18.100] by these lawyers she is not going to like that but she can't do anything to you about it you have [01:05:18.100 --> 01:05:24.580] to assume she's going to rule against you anyway what she can do is go to these lawyers and tell [01:05:24.580 --> 01:05:27.780] them you better do something to get this guy off my case [01:05:30.980 --> 01:05:37.700] that may not be right but that's pretty much how it works in the real world we both live in [01:05:41.220 --> 01:05:44.900] at the end of the day they're human beings and they're subject to the same [01:05:46.180 --> 01:05:51.700] frustrations and pressures as anybody else and when these lawyers start [01:05:51.700 --> 01:05:54.980] annoying the judges the judges have the power to annoy back [01:05:58.820 --> 01:06:03.700] but you said this judge has been pretty straightforward [01:06:05.620 --> 01:06:12.740] she's been polite um i mean i learned i learned a trick about the judges they they really don't [01:06:12.740 --> 01:06:18.100] care if you're a day or two late just as long as you acknowledge it and my the first judge [01:06:18.100 --> 01:06:22.660] you know i i would put motions in or whatever and one time i i missed you know i was a day late or [01:06:22.660 --> 01:06:26.660] something and he just said i'll make an administrative move i'll make administrative [01:06:26.660 --> 01:06:30.260] decision here granted you know he didn't he was just totally kind of letting me be pro se [01:06:31.060 --> 01:06:36.100] and so i tested this judge this time just to see how she was because this is the first time i've [01:06:36.100 --> 01:06:43.620] had to file too much you know it's much with her so i filed it a day late and then i put in a motion [01:06:43.620 --> 01:06:48.820] much with her so i filed it a day late and then i put in a motion a day late just to see what she [01:06:48.820 --> 01:06:54.580] would do well she granted it but she also put in a no which the other judges don't this will [01:06:55.300 --> 01:07:00.340] for all future community for all future uh extensions for any party if it's late i will [01:07:00.340 --> 01:07:07.140] not grant it so she was just making a remark just let you know i'm watching you so i tested her and [01:07:07.140 --> 01:07:14.020] she fired right back so she's been kind of uh she's been kind of respectful and stern at the same [01:07:14.020 --> 01:07:22.500] time so yes to answer your question but she's also very biased towards the case and i don't know if [01:07:22.500 --> 01:07:27.380] that's just because of a thing in illinois like you just are expected to get toady legally because [01:07:27.380 --> 01:07:34.340] you live there or she just wants a sexier case before her so i keep reminding the court this [01:07:34.340 --> 01:07:39.940] is about fraud before and after the toe and the toe was just the mechanism they use for fraud but [01:07:39.940 --> 01:07:45.540] you know and i keep reminding the court that and she doesn't like it when i do that so i don't know [01:07:45.540 --> 01:07:50.740] how to feel about her when we really get to the to the to the meat of this case and we're getting [01:07:50.740 --> 01:07:57.460] there you know well one one thing to keep in mind you're never talking to this court [01:07:57.460 --> 01:08:08.500] you are always talking to the appellate court your only purpose is to set the record for appeal if [01:08:08.500 --> 01:08:17.220] this annoys her let her be annoyed will it annoy the appellate court no appellate court the appellate [01:08:17.220 --> 01:08:25.220] court's a lot busier than she is and you know when i write legal documents just like uh what we do on [01:08:25.220 --> 01:08:31.060] the show is a good example of how to write legal documents when you're talking to me or when anyone [01:08:31.060 --> 01:08:38.180] else is talking on the show i'm sitting here listening to what you're saying and trying to [01:08:38.180 --> 01:08:47.620] figure out what questions my listeners will have most of this material i know but i try to listen [01:08:47.620 --> 01:08:54.500] to it from the perspective of an eighth grader who doesn't know anything about law and they don't [01:08:54.500 --> 01:09:03.540] know and doesn't know anything about the case so when you make a a statement that alludes to some [01:09:04.180 --> 01:09:11.460] property of law or something that went on that we talked about earlier in the case i'll stop and ask [01:09:11.460 --> 01:09:20.020] a question about it because we don't want our listener to get behind because of something you [01:09:20.020 --> 01:09:25.860] and i both know but our listeners don't necessarily know that so we try to keep them up to speed [01:09:25.860 --> 01:09:35.620] when you write legal documents same way judge is busy reads lots of documents do not expect [01:09:35.620 --> 01:09:47.140] the judge to remember anything remind them where you need reference to other information [01:09:47.140 --> 01:09:53.700] and make a reference to that other information you know do it as subtly and diplomatically as you can [01:09:54.580 --> 01:10:00.900] but at the end of the day it's not the trial judge that you're playing to it's the appellate judge [01:10:00.900 --> 01:10:08.260] who didn't hear all that went on in this case so when they read the appellate documents [01:10:08.260 --> 01:10:16.420] you need to think what questions are they going to have in their mind that i haven't answered [01:10:18.100 --> 01:10:22.740] in order you have to answer those either before you create the question or just after [01:10:24.980 --> 01:10:31.300] so reminding them is is not a problem at all i if i were you i would not be concerned about that [01:10:31.300 --> 01:10:38.580] at all i don't care if the judge doesn't like it because you're not writing for this judge anyway [01:10:40.020 --> 01:10:46.900] okay you kind of just answered my next question i would feel better preparing myself and my own [01:10:46.900 --> 01:10:54.020] mind for appeal because you know they they raise the bar one side i have to answer and and so if [01:10:54.020 --> 01:10:57.940] they're setting me up to like walk away because they're trying to intimidate me because they [01:10:57.940 --> 01:11:02.980] don't think i'll do appeals they probably never thought i would do a motion to compel and they [01:11:02.980 --> 01:11:10.580] certainly didn't think i was going to do a subpoena so why not just file off an appeal next time if [01:11:10.580 --> 01:11:15.860] they you know they rule something that's questionable and then after that if they [01:11:15.860 --> 01:11:21.620] continue to be that agree just start filing judicial conduct complaints criminal complaints [01:11:21.620 --> 01:11:28.820] all that yeah i think that's a great idea you're just laying the groundwork for the appellate court [01:11:30.420 --> 01:11:38.020] dr graves in jurisdictionary you know he reminds everybody your only purpose in the trial court [01:11:38.020 --> 01:11:44.980] is to set the record for appeal you go into the trial court and the judge rules against you [01:11:44.980 --> 01:11:50.420] and it makes you feel horrible and you feel like you're losing the case and you get stressed and [01:11:50.420 --> 01:11:56.740] depressed and all that other stuff heck with all that you don't care what that judge does [01:11:58.260 --> 01:12:04.900] you're just down here to get the facts of law on the record yep going methodically and patiently [01:12:04.900 --> 01:12:13.620] through all the mistakes they want to make raising exceptions objecting whatever you need to [01:12:14.340 --> 01:12:17.860] that throws the flag on the field so that the appellate court can review that [01:12:17.860 --> 01:12:27.700] up yeah and and once you're doing that when when they realize you are not impassioned by their [01:12:27.700 --> 01:12:36.100] rulings they'll have more respect for you you will you'll seem more like one of the lawyers you watch [01:12:36.100 --> 01:12:42.740] these lawyers objection objection well they raise the objection but they don't get excited they don't [01:12:42.740 --> 01:12:47.860] get angry they just state their objection the grounds for their objection and judge rules [01:12:47.860 --> 01:12:54.020] against them and sometimes their lawyer will say well we ask the court to to reflect the [01:12:55.940 --> 01:13:04.900] the party's uh exception to the ruling nobody's upset nobody's angry they're just touching the [01:13:04.900 --> 01:13:12.020] basis yeah except when you as a pro se start doing that you might get to see the attorneys [01:13:12.020 --> 01:13:17.060] on the other side physically shaking trembling or getting red in the face [01:13:19.460 --> 01:13:24.580] you start seeing them snapping their fingers and whispering and having other lawyers coming over [01:13:24.580 --> 01:13:29.140] there and they start clustering together and whispering to each other bringing more books over [01:13:29.860 --> 01:13:38.100] they it does something to them they're not accustomed i had we had a guy out of florida [01:13:38.100 --> 01:13:46.660] who was uh adjudicating a tax issue he kept calling into the show and he told us that [01:13:47.540 --> 01:13:52.980] after he called in one day and he said after the hearing he got on the elevator and this lawyer [01:13:52.980 --> 01:13:59.220] from the other side got on the elevator and he pushed the button to go down and after the [01:13:59.220 --> 01:14:04.820] doors closed and the lawyer reached over and hit the stop button he thought uh oh this is not going [01:14:04.820 --> 01:14:14.260] to look good and the lawyer asked him if he was an attorney and he said no and the lawyer said i've [01:14:14.260 --> 01:14:20.100] been doing this for about 15 years i've worked with the best i've worked with the with the worst [01:14:20.820 --> 01:14:25.380] but i have never had anyone take me to the books the way you have [01:14:25.380 --> 01:14:33.300] and he made it a point to express his appreciation for how this guy handled himself [01:14:36.420 --> 01:14:40.100] have you ever been in a fight in a high school parking lot [01:14:41.860 --> 01:14:48.020] or the high school playground you get out there and you get in a fight with one of the other kids [01:14:48.020 --> 01:14:55.380] fight with one of the other kids you beat each other up and it doesn't matter who wins you wind [01:14:55.380 --> 01:15:02.580] up with this as long as both sides gave as good as they got you wind up with mutual respect [01:15:06.020 --> 01:15:12.980] and i would much rather have that than have them like me and the judge will be the same way even [01:15:12.980 --> 01:15:21.060] if you annoy the judge you stand your ground you don't get excited you don't get angry [01:15:21.060 --> 01:15:27.940] you just keep methodically plugging away at them if whatever else you get you'll wind up with their [01:15:27.940 --> 01:15:35.620] respect i think one of the greatest compliments i got was the process the district attorney in [01:15:35.620 --> 01:15:40.900] the county i live in asked me what i was doing in wichita falls and i said how did you know i was [01:15:40.900 --> 01:15:46.900] in wichita falls oh i got a call from the district attorney up there and he wanted to know if i knew [01:15:46.900 --> 01:15:54.500] you and i told him yeah i did and he wanted to know if you were crazy i said well greg what'd [01:15:54.500 --> 01:16:02.260] you tell him yeah you're crazy but if he mentioned something about law pay attention he does his [01:16:02.260 --> 01:16:16.100] homework i'll take that any day and if you keep in mind your only purpose is to set the record [01:16:17.860 --> 01:16:21.220] that will give you a posture that will get their respect [01:16:21.220 --> 01:16:34.180] it may not like you but who really cares about that i don't and and this is this is for everybody [01:16:34.180 --> 01:16:41.220] else because when you're in something where you have a dog in the hunt it's really hard to be [01:16:41.220 --> 01:16:50.820] dispassionate it's really hard to not be overwhelmed yeah keep in mind betrayed you're just setting the [01:16:50.820 --> 01:16:56.980] record they the worse they do the better for you hang on randy kelton bread fountain we'll be right [01:16:56.980 --> 01:17:05.380] back are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuits stop [01:17:05.380 --> 01:17:10.580] debt collectors now with the michael mirrors proven method michael mirrors has won six cases [01:17:10.580 --> 01:17:16.020] in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step-by-step instructions [01:17:16.020 --> 01:17:21.300] in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statues what to do when [01:17:21.300 --> 01:17:26.820] contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt [01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:32.020] collectors out of your credit report how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay [01:17:32.020 --> 01:17:38.260] you to go away the michael mirrors proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors [01:17:38.260 --> 01:17:44.100] personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:17:44.100 --> 01:17:49.460] and click on the blue michael mirrors banner or email michael mirrors at yahoo.com that's [01:17:49.460 --> 01:17:58.420] ruleoflawradio.com or email m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [01:17:58.420 --> 01:18:04.020] collectors now i love logos without the shows on this network i'd be almost as ignorant as my [01:18:04.020 --> 01:18:08.500] friends i'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back i need my truth fixed i'd [01:18:08.500 --> 01:18:14.020] be lost without logos and i really want to help keep this network on the air and love to volunteers [01:18:14.020 --> 01:18:18.420] a show producer but i'm a bit of a luddite and i really don't have any money to give because i [01:18:18.420 --> 01:18:24.660] spent it all on supplements how can i help logos well i'm glad you asked whenever you order anything [01:18:24.660 --> 01:18:30.180] from amazon you can help logos you can order your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is [01:18:30.180 --> 01:18:37.940] clear your cookies now go to logosradio.network.com click on the amazon logo and bookmark it now when [01:18:37.940 --> 01:18:44.740] you order anything from amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do i pay extra no do [01:18:44.740 --> 01:18:51.700] you have to do anything different when i order no can i use my amazon prime no i mean yes wow giving [01:18:51.700 --> 01:18:58.500] without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect thank you so much we are welcome happy [01:18:58.500 --> 01:19:14.980] holidays logos this is the logos the logos the radio network [01:19:14.980 --> 01:19:29.460] ain't gonna blame me don't bore me [01:19:29.460 --> 01:19:40.180] ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again i was blindsided but okay we are back [01:19:40.180 --> 01:19:47.140] randy kelton brett fountainville baleno and chris colorado chris do you have anything else [01:19:48.820 --> 01:19:53.700] no i think you guys gave me pretty good game uh game plan here so thank you very much as [01:19:53.700 --> 01:20:00.180] always thank you very much okay thank you chris now we're going to go to what appears to be a [01:20:00.180 --> 01:20:12.740] first-time caller uh karen what was that at six seven eight atlanta area code if you are in georgia [01:20:15.300 --> 01:20:18.900] talk oh wait let me unmute you let's see did i hit the wrong one [01:20:18.900 --> 01:20:25.540] um okay talk to us karen i'm here [01:20:29.620 --> 01:20:31.620] you're breaking up there's try that again [01:20:38.260 --> 01:20:47.780] i'm hearing pieces of a voice are you hearing her well but uh randy no i'm just getting bits [01:20:47.780 --> 01:20:58.420] and pieces as well okay karen to another room all right yes that is better okay are you you're karen [01:20:59.300 --> 01:21:07.220] okay good yes i'm karen from snowville georgia from georgia all right [01:21:09.460 --> 01:21:12.100] okay what do you have for us today [01:21:12.100 --> 01:21:20.020] um i don't know if this is like um an unusual thing or not i'm not but i was arrested [01:21:21.460 --> 01:21:30.020] um for criminal trespass i have a school board meeting in november of 2021 because in october [01:21:30.020 --> 01:21:36.980] of 2021 i took my mask off at the school board meeting and violated their policy and therefore [01:21:36.980 --> 01:21:44.900] i was quote disruptive unquote and so they issued me a criminal trespass from the school [01:21:45.780 --> 01:21:52.900] and i ignored it and went anyway and they arrested me so my court case is now coming up [01:21:53.460 --> 01:22:02.500] wednesday and my lawyer has um filed and i can't pronounce it a demurrer [01:22:02.500 --> 01:22:11.380] i guess it was a motion to dismiss it and but now she came to me friday with a plea deal [01:22:12.820 --> 01:22:20.020] and wants me to take the plea deal and i don't want to take the plea deal even though [01:22:20.820 --> 01:22:27.060] both cases would be um marked as no prosc and one would just be dismissed totally because i got [01:22:27.060 --> 01:22:36.420] arrested again in february for the same thing and um anyway long story short she wants me to take [01:22:36.420 --> 01:22:44.100] this plea and part of this plea is is i have to do pre-trial diversion um class that would be eight [01:22:44.100 --> 01:22:50.500] hours long and i'd have to go and take it you know um the entire month and that makes me nervous [01:22:50.500 --> 01:22:57.140] because she keeps telling me it's going to be shown as a dismissed and not on my records but if that's [01:22:57.140 --> 01:23:05.540] the case why am i have to take this course does that does any of that make sense yeah they can [01:23:05.540 --> 01:23:14.500] place pretty much any condition they want to on a dismissal of this type [01:23:14.500 --> 01:23:17.700] on a dismissal of this type [01:23:20.500 --> 01:23:28.420] so this is a the contract negotiation for me to take that though we'd say that again [01:23:31.380 --> 01:23:34.660] i said is it wise for me to take a plea in this situation [01:23:34.660 --> 01:23:43.940] well it's hard for me to say what's wise for you i can give you my philosophy [01:23:45.940 --> 01:23:55.140] if they don't have a case they're going to huff and puff right up to the courthouse door [01:23:55.140 --> 01:24:03.380] so we had one guy that they were trying they tackled him because he had a recorder with him [01:24:03.380 --> 01:24:11.620] in the courthouse they screwed everything up and the guards overreacted and then they prosecuted [01:24:11.620 --> 01:24:17.860] him to cover up what they did and they kept offering him deals and he kept telling him to go [01:24:17.860 --> 01:24:28.100] scratch they got to the courthouse door and they offered to dismiss everything on just some minor [01:24:28.100 --> 01:24:34.420] concession on his part and he told him to go scratch they went in the courthouse and the [01:24:34.420 --> 01:24:38.500] lawyers were all over themselves trying to figure out how to get this thing dismissed [01:24:39.460 --> 01:24:46.020] they did not want this coming before the court and i suggest to you they are not going to want this [01:24:46.020 --> 01:24:50.420] they are not going to want this getting before the court of appeals [01:24:52.660 --> 01:25:00.100] this is something that needs this they threatened you in order to deny you access to a public [01:25:00.100 --> 01:25:08.340] building and there are a lot of people in this position who would love to have some case law [01:25:08.340 --> 01:25:16.260] come from the appellate courts about that is but before you do that is this the the fight you want [01:25:16.260 --> 01:25:17.300] to have [01:25:21.060 --> 01:25:29.700] see that's that's one of the things that i'm i'm struggling over because i felt like from the in [01:25:29.700 --> 01:25:34.500] people look at me funny when i say this but i felt like from the very get-go that god put me in that [01:25:34.500 --> 01:25:42.500] position to take care of this and that if i feel like if i take this plea am i going to be a [01:25:42.500 --> 01:25:48.660] disappointing him but be am i going to wander the rest of my life if i could have done something [01:25:48.660 --> 01:25:58.980] different that is hard enough then let me speak to that i am an old guy my house is paid for [01:25:58.980 --> 01:26:09.380] my kids are grown i have no debt i can do anything i want to nobody is depending on me [01:26:11.620 --> 01:26:15.700] i have no responsibilities i can pick any fight i want to pick [01:26:17.220 --> 01:26:22.340] and a lot of other folks out here just like me we have on the telegram channel [01:26:22.340 --> 01:26:30.260] uh the mask site law the mask law society channel with a whole bunch of people on there who [01:26:30.260 --> 01:26:40.980] are taking on these issues you don't have to have this fight unless you feel compelled to have this [01:26:40.980 --> 01:26:52.660] fight but if you do feel compelled to have this fight you really need to give them a fight you are [01:26:53.620 --> 01:27:01.140] a citizen in a republic who have powers and abilities far beyond those public officials [01:27:02.580 --> 01:27:08.260] there are all kind of things you can do to them but it's not right for you to do that [01:27:08.260 --> 01:27:17.380] do to them but it's not right for everybody and if you don't feel like you're in a position [01:27:17.380 --> 01:27:24.020] to take on this fight don't feel like you're letting anybody down there are lots of us out here [01:27:24.020 --> 01:27:32.180] to have this fight if you get in this fight you're really not prepared for it you won't do any of us [01:27:32.180 --> 01:27:41.780] in good the last thing we need is someone who's not prepared to have the fight taking it on because [01:27:41.780 --> 01:27:51.140] they feel some kind of personal responsibility to do it you're right you're right in that [01:27:52.180 --> 01:27:57.700] see i've been i just have to be praying over it but the other question i had when it comes [01:27:57.700 --> 01:28:05.060] wait a minute let me make one more comment on that if you take this deal and they dismiss this case [01:28:06.020 --> 01:28:12.260] and you take this little course sheet thing you can still come back and sue them personally [01:28:12.980 --> 01:28:23.140] and the civil courts that that's what my question was if i see this deal can i because the other [01:28:23.140 --> 01:28:31.300] part of this equation is the school board issued out a criminal trespass warning to the NAACP [01:28:31.300 --> 01:28:37.620] president of Gwinnett county and she showed up the next month and they let her stay there causing [01:28:37.620 --> 01:28:44.580] a ruckus but yet they arrested a parent so i don't want i want to be able to sue them for [01:28:44.580 --> 01:28:49.060] the discrimination and everything else that i can but i don't want this to be in the way [01:28:49.060 --> 01:28:59.780] okay if if they dismiss the case then it's not in your way if they reduce it to a lesser charge [01:29:00.500 --> 01:29:04.820] it might be somewhat in your way but you said they were willing to dismiss the case if you [01:29:04.820 --> 01:29:14.020] took this eight hour course right the supreme court has rules the best offer they've ever seen [01:29:14.020 --> 01:29:19.940] you that means they know they can't win at the end of the day [01:29:21.540 --> 01:29:24.180] now that's easy for me to say that's what i was here [01:29:25.540 --> 01:29:29.140] it's easy for me to say that but my liberty is not on the line [01:29:31.940 --> 01:29:41.380] yours is so always my first advice liberty first get your liberty cleared [01:29:41.380 --> 01:29:49.220] once your liberty is cleared then you can come back and have the best kind of fight to have [01:29:50.340 --> 01:29:57.300] and the best kind of fight to have is the one you picked hang on randy kelton brett [01:29:57.300 --> 01:30:05.460] we'll be right back sorry soft drink lovers even diet drinks can make you fat a new study [01:30:05.460 --> 01:30:09.940] shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff [01:30:09.940 --> 01:30:15.860] i'm dr kathryn albrecht and i'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas [01:30:16.500 --> 01:30:22.020] privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again [01:30:22.020 --> 01:30:26.820] and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too [01:30:26.820 --> 01:30:32.100] so protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself [01:30:32.100 --> 01:30:36.740] privacy it's worth hanging on to this public service announcement is brought to you by [01:30:36.740 --> 01:30:44.100] startpage.com the private search engine alternative to google yahoo and bin start over with start page [01:30:45.460 --> 01:30:51.620] artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight right wrong researchers at ut [01:30:51.620 --> 01:30:56.340] san antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade they found that [01:30:56.340 --> 01:31:02.340] regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all [01:31:02.340 --> 01:31:07.220] the study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite but unlike regular sugars [01:31:07.220 --> 01:31:12.580] don't deliver anything to squelch it waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings [01:31:12.580 --> 01:31:17.700] which can result in a larger overall calorie intake so use natural sweeteners to maintain [01:31:17.700 --> 01:31:22.420] a healthy weight and if you need to shed some pounds avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink [01:31:22.420 --> 01:31:28.180] water instead i'm dr kathryn albrecht more news and information at kathrynalbrecht.com [01:31:28.180 --> 01:31:35.620] this is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of september 11 the [01:31:35.620 --> 01:31:41.460] government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a [01:31:41.460 --> 01:31:45.540] controlled demolition over 6 000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and [01:31:45.540 --> 01:31:50.180] thousands of my fellow first responders are dying i'm not a conspiracy theorist i'm a structural [01:31:50.180 --> 01:31:54.500] engineer i'm a new york city correction officer i'm an air force pilot i'm a father who lost his son [01:31:54.500 --> 01:31:59.940] we're americans and we deserve the truth go to remember building seven dot org today [01:32:01.620 --> 01:32:05.780] rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we [01:32:05.780 --> 01:32:09.460] live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society [01:32:09.460 --> 01:32:13.620] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to [01:32:13.620 --> 01:32:17.620] travel freely from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly [01:32:17.620 --> 01:32:22.020] the right to due process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to [01:32:22.020 --> 01:32:26.420] learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy eddie [01:32:26.420 --> 01:32:30.340] craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool [01:32:30.340 --> 01:32:34.420] available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of [01:32:34.420 --> 01:32:39.060] law you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio.com and [01:32:39.060 --> 01:32:42.740] ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas [01:32:42.740 --> 01:32:47.300] transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar [01:32:47.300 --> 01:32:51.220] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your [01:32:51.220 --> 01:32:55.620] rights with the help of this material from rule of law radio.com order your copy today and together [01:32:55.620 --> 01:33:06.420] we can have free society we all want and deserve looking for some truth you found it logos radio [01:33:06.420 --> 01:33:21.620] network.com [01:33:36.740 --> 01:33:39.620] the wicked come with temptation [01:33:42.180 --> 01:33:45.620] they're trying to buy the whole place [01:33:47.620 --> 01:33:50.420] they wanna poison the nation [01:33:53.140 --> 01:33:55.620] because they've fallen from grace [01:33:58.580 --> 01:34:01.620] i will not drink from that cup [01:34:01.620 --> 01:34:06.420] i just can't act that way [01:34:09.460 --> 01:34:12.580] they got this problem they're dreaming of [01:34:14.260 --> 01:34:17.220] and i won't be the slave come what may [01:34:24.740 --> 01:34:30.660] okay we are back in the kelton red fountain blue of law radio and we're talking to karen [01:34:30.660 --> 01:34:37.860] in georgia and karen i think i know about your your case from the telegram channel [01:34:39.140 --> 01:34:47.780] and you know we're a bunch of patriots here and we get out here and we we fight the good fight [01:34:48.500 --> 01:34:57.860] and we take on the bad guys well you gotta take the bad guys on from where you're at and [01:34:57.860 --> 01:35:05.860] uh when they're challenging your liberty first get your liberty clear you can't fight them [01:35:05.860 --> 01:35:15.220] effectively if they're holding your liberty over your head if it was me right i'd take that deal [01:35:15.220 --> 01:35:24.100] in a heartbeat i'd do that eight hours then i'd come back and land on them like a ton of bricks [01:35:24.100 --> 01:35:36.260] and do it with absolute impunity i just did it to a judge in rome texas i changed my plea [01:35:36.260 --> 01:35:43.780] i fought him like a tiger and they set hearings and didn't notify me so they could charge me [01:35:43.780 --> 01:35:55.380] was failure to appear so he figures he's got me so i filed a change of plea and even the prosecutor [01:35:55.380 --> 01:36:04.100] said well mr kelton you can't do that of course i can do that i already did that well mr kelton [01:36:04.100 --> 01:36:12.420] if you'll just accept this plea i'll lower the fee from 800 to 600 no ma'am we can't talk about [01:36:12.420 --> 01:36:20.980] that i have a notice of of intent to appeal she said you can't appeal yet there's no adjudication [01:36:21.940 --> 01:36:26.420] said yeah there is i changed my plea and she's standing sitting there scratching her head and it [01:36:26.420 --> 01:36:37.300] finally sunk in the yeah it outmaneuvered them and then when the judge heard my pleading he got out [01:36:37.300 --> 01:36:45.860] the recorder told me this was a court of record and recorded the hearing and was very careful [01:36:46.420 --> 01:36:55.780] this time because he knew he had been out maneuvered now i get out of his court get into the [01:36:56.580 --> 01:37:02.900] county court now i can hammer him big time there's nothing you can do about it when i filed a notice [01:37:02.900 --> 01:37:10.820] of intent to appeal he lost jurisdiction so he knew because i'd already asked him to arrest his [01:37:10.820 --> 01:37:16.980] clerk and asked him to have a bailiff in the next hearing so i could ask the bailiff to arrest him [01:37:17.620 --> 01:37:24.820] so he knew i was coming after him but first i got to get out of his court so my suggestion to you is [01:37:24.820 --> 01:37:31.940] take this deal get your liberty cleared and if anybody wants to have a criticism well you just [01:37:31.940 --> 01:37:37.940] go on down there and put your mask on and let them threaten you with six months a year in jail see [01:37:37.940 --> 01:37:46.900] how that works for you so you are certainly welcome to do that but you are no good trying to fight for [01:37:46.900 --> 01:37:59.140] our rights if you're trying to keep yourself out of jail at the same time so take the deal okay i [01:37:59.140 --> 01:38:07.700] think that's the way i'm going to go so can i ask you one question if we decide to go to court and [01:38:07.700 --> 01:38:12.740] they don't dismiss the charges then um which i probably will take the deal but i just want the [01:38:12.740 --> 01:38:18.900] answer should with it next step be a juror request a jury trial [01:38:21.060 --> 01:38:26.660] i would say yes but in my case juries always find me incredibly guilty [01:38:28.020 --> 01:38:38.100] but juries are harder on the prosecution as well because juries are always a unknown [01:38:38.100 --> 01:38:45.620] so i would say absolutely request a jury well no i shouldn't say it that way it depends on [01:38:46.820 --> 01:38:52.020] your position i won't ask for a jury and the reason i won't ask for a jury [01:38:52.980 --> 01:39:02.180] is because i'm going to bring the judge to point of law if you have a jury then whatever the jury [01:39:02.180 --> 01:39:08.980] rules you're stuck with but if you don't have a jury then you can hold the judge responsible for [01:39:08.980 --> 01:39:16.580] the rulings that he makes and i want to deviate he can't read between the lines well it's all [01:39:16.580 --> 01:39:24.100] circumstantial evidence but we find that so the jury can you can't challenge that judge doesn't [01:39:24.100 --> 01:39:33.220] have that leeway so it depends on who you are what your abilities are and the fight you're willing [01:39:33.220 --> 01:39:40.980] to have if you take the deal and they dismiss the case then now you can come back and come after [01:39:40.980 --> 01:39:48.020] them with your impunity because the supreme court is going to take the case and they're going to [01:39:48.020 --> 01:39:55.780] now you can come back and come after them with your impunity because the supreme recently ruled [01:39:56.660 --> 01:39:59.780] that if the case is dismissed you can sue them [01:40:03.140 --> 01:40:05.700] as if the case should never have happened in the first place [01:40:07.780 --> 01:40:14.180] so when you come back and you're the plaintiff it's a whole different ball game [01:40:14.180 --> 01:40:22.740] now you're the one dragging them up on the carpet feels good too yeah this is fun [01:40:26.340 --> 01:40:32.420] okay i really appreciate that you have taken the time and given me advice i think that you've [01:40:32.420 --> 01:40:38.660] given me advice that i really needed somebody to tell me and i cannot tell you how much i appreciate [01:40:38.660 --> 01:40:49.780] it well this is my job we're trying to help people take on this system and brett and i both [01:40:49.780 --> 01:40:59.220] have experience at it and we're learning what works and what doesn't and being a martyr yeah never a [01:40:59.220 --> 01:41:10.820] good idea that's what i was thinking but you know you know i just i i needed somebody who [01:41:12.100 --> 01:41:18.420] is not involved to say you know it's okay you're okay yeah yes and i appreciate that [01:41:20.260 --> 01:41:26.180] and someone who's who's not in the fight and not dedicated to the fight i am dedicated to the fight [01:41:26.180 --> 01:41:34.100] but we're realists and we know what works and what doesn't and what works is the ability to be there [01:41:34.740 --> 01:41:45.860] in the long term and i have had them come after me and adjudicating my own case when my liberty [01:41:45.860 --> 01:41:55.220] was at risk was incredibly difficult for me i went before a jury with all of my knowledge and i [01:41:55.220 --> 01:42:07.380] managed to convince the jury to throw the book at me so don't do that now when i go back before the [01:42:07.380 --> 01:42:16.100] court when i do that sued when i sued a a magistrate after i played him like a cheap fiddle [01:42:17.620 --> 01:42:22.900] you should have seen him when he walked into the courtroom after i had sued him [01:42:22.900 --> 01:42:31.860] he had himself a whole other attitude and in that case i asked the bailiff to arrest the trial judge [01:42:31.860 --> 01:42:41.380] twice mr bailiff did you hear that he just stood there you're standing mute did you hear that [01:42:41.380 --> 01:42:51.460] arrest that judge that was so much fun but i could do that because i was the plaintiff [01:42:51.460 --> 01:43:00.900] i was the plaintiff i picked this fight so we if if you want to go after these guys we want you [01:43:00.900 --> 01:43:13.300] to be good at it and this will make you much better at it right thank you again you are welcome [01:43:13.300 --> 01:43:22.180] well then y'all have a great evening you too okay thanks for calling okay we have another first time [01:43:22.180 --> 01:43:32.980] caller uh looks like vivian where's 904 brett i don't know you're in the 904 area code give us [01:43:32.980 --> 01:43:38.180] first name and estate hold on hold on we'll we're about to run out of time so we'll pick this up on [01:43:38.180 --> 01:43:45.140] the other side uh this is randy calton brett fountain wheel of law radio we got a couple [01:43:45.140 --> 01:43:53.300] spots on the caller board i call in number 512-646-1984 we'll be right back [01:44:00.260 --> 01:44:06.180] through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition [01:44:06.180 --> 01:44:10.980] people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that [01:44:10.980 --> 01:44:17.300] our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition [01:44:17.300 --> 01:44:22.100] in a world where natural foods have been irradiated adulterated and mutilated [01:44:22.100 --> 01:44:28.260] longevity can provide the nutrients you need logos radio network gets many requests to endorse [01:44:28.260 --> 01:44:34.820] all sorts of products most of which we reject we have come to trust longevity so much we became a [01:44:34.820 --> 01:44:41.220] marketing distributor along with alex jones ben fuchs and many others when you order from logos [01:44:41.220 --> 01:44:48.260] radio network.com your health will improve as you help support quality radio as you realize the [01:44:48.260 --> 01:44:54.980] benefits of longevity you may want to join us as a distributor you can experience improved health [01:44:54.980 --> 01:45:02.660] help your friends and family and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff or defendant [01:45:02.660 --> 01:45:08.820] in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to [01:45:08.820 --> 01:45:16.980] understand 4 cd course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know [01:45:16.980 --> 01:45:22.260] what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself [01:45:22.980 --> 01:45:29.380] thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created [01:45:29.380 --> 01:45:36.340] by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit [01:45:36.340 --> 01:45:41.620] you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control [01:45:41.620 --> 01:45:48.740] our american courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil [01:45:48.740 --> 01:45:56.500] cases pro se tactics and much more please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or [01:45:56.500 --> 01:46:00.260] call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY [01:46:26.740 --> 01:46:30.260] Okay, karma is lurking around the corner [01:46:30.260 --> 01:46:32.260] Sing Jerry, come! [01:46:32.260 --> 01:46:38.100] As we sow, so shall we reap [01:46:38.100 --> 01:46:46.020] So many crucial words get put on hold while we sing [01:46:46.020 --> 01:46:52.180] Try as we will, take small steps to the giant knee [01:46:52.180 --> 01:46:54.180] Remember what goes around comes around [01:46:54.180 --> 01:47:00.580] As we sow, so shall we reap [01:47:00.580 --> 01:47:02.580] Everybody listen to this song [01:47:16.580 --> 01:47:22.580] Alright, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain. [01:47:22.580 --> 01:47:28.820] And we're going to go to our first time caller here in the 904 area code. [01:47:28.820 --> 01:47:32.180] If you're in 904, give us a first name and a state. [01:47:34.580 --> 01:47:37.300] Hi, my name is Vivian. I'm from Florida. [01:47:38.660 --> 01:47:42.260] Vivian in Florida. Great. Thanks for calling. What's on your mind? [01:47:42.260 --> 01:47:53.860] Oh my gosh. Well, I have been working on this case for my granddaughter who, and I'm going to try to [01:47:53.860 --> 01:48:01.380] make this as short as possible, but granddaughter and it has been going on since August of 2021. [01:48:03.060 --> 01:48:06.020] And there are so many different facets of it. [01:48:06.020 --> 01:48:16.740] She moved a camper onto the land with permission and parked it in a assigned spot that they gave [01:48:16.740 --> 01:48:27.700] her to park in until they had an actual lot with amenities available. So this was all an oral agreement. [01:48:27.700 --> 01:48:34.740] And it was done with what she thought was the owner of the property. [01:48:35.540 --> 01:48:42.340] So I'm just going to go through this very quickly. So we're looking at a breach of an oral contract. [01:48:42.980 --> 01:48:46.580] And then because they allowed her to live in it, [01:48:46.580 --> 01:48:56.100] but it was supposedly a spot for storage is what it was on a throughway. Other people were parked [01:48:56.100 --> 01:49:07.220] there also. So I am trying to go to the course of, and I initially submitted it as a small claim. [01:49:07.220 --> 01:49:15.780] And I made it self-help. What they did is they seized all her property. They seized the camper, [01:49:15.780 --> 01:49:25.780] the car, and all her property. Then they, when they seized it, they made extortion demand. [01:49:26.740 --> 01:49:34.980] After that, I sent them a letter and they said, well, you know, we're going to get you out of this [01:49:34.980 --> 01:49:42.820] after that. I sent them a letter of demand or a notice of demand that we wanted $6,000. [01:49:45.060 --> 01:49:51.460] But then they didn't answer anything. So I filed them a small claim at that point. And that went [01:49:51.460 --> 01:50:02.260] up to $8,000, which did not nearly cover all of what she had. That did not go through. It was a [01:50:02.260 --> 01:50:13.460] no show. The courts did not let us know about it. And I had not addressed all of the defendants or [01:50:13.460 --> 01:50:20.740] one of the defendants properly. So I did a lot of research, went to Circuit Civil. I did that [01:50:21.540 --> 01:50:28.420] almost a year later. So I guess it was like 11 months later, because I found out that there is [01:50:28.420 --> 01:50:39.460] a trustee who handles the real trust, a real property. So the trustee handles [01:50:41.940 --> 01:50:52.980] the trust, which entails five parcels of real property. They all wanted, all the attorneys [01:50:52.980 --> 01:51:01.540] wanted to get dismissed. There were, I think, four attorneys, because I sued the first beneficiary, [01:51:02.500 --> 01:51:09.220] or the trustee, the first beneficiary and the property manager. All the attorneys wanted to [01:51:09.220 --> 01:51:18.020] withdraw, but so far I still have all of them except one. Well, at this point, in the year 2023. [01:51:18.020 --> 01:51:29.300] The judge questioned me as to, well, the trustee should not really be part of this. And I explained [01:51:29.300 --> 01:51:38.020] to him, and I said, Judge, isn't the trustee supposed to oversee the land? And just because [01:51:38.020 --> 01:51:44.020] the activities on the land are happening, he should know what those activities are, illegal [01:51:44.020 --> 01:51:51.220] or not illegal, and they are illegal. This is not a mobile home park or anything like that. And it's [01:51:51.220 --> 01:52:01.540] a zoned commercial office. Okay. So then I'm going to bring you forward. We got through all [01:52:01.540 --> 01:52:06.260] the withdrawal process and we're still in court. But one attorney- [01:52:06.260 --> 01:52:10.020] Just a moment. One quick question for you before you go to the next part. [01:52:10.020 --> 01:52:18.900] You mentioned that they took the RV and all the belongings. Who did the seizing? [01:52:20.740 --> 01:52:33.540] Okay. The primary beneficiary slash manager of the property, he calls himself the manager landlord. [01:52:33.540 --> 01:52:41.620] He and his property manager seized the property. What they did and how they did that is they gave [01:52:41.620 --> 01:52:48.500] the police false information and said she was a squatter when she had been there six months waiting [01:52:48.500 --> 01:52:58.020] for a lot. And these lots that they're talking about, they're going to have amenities. This is [01:52:58.020 --> 01:53:04.260] something that the property that they're on is owned by or maybe managed by these same people [01:53:04.260 --> 01:53:08.340] that are saying that they're going to develop a lot and she's going to have a place. [01:53:09.860 --> 01:53:19.460] They have some lots that are illegal. It's a mobile home camper rental. And then they have [01:53:19.460 --> 01:53:27.060] mobile lots and campers that are rental. And then they have what they call storage, which they [01:53:27.060 --> 01:53:39.380] park on the wherever in there. It's just real property, kind of wooded. And it's not zoned. [01:53:39.380 --> 01:53:48.340] I mean, it's zoned for commercial office, but they're using it. The owner collects the money [01:53:48.340 --> 01:53:52.820] and pockets it, is what he does because everybody has to pay in cash. [01:53:52.820 --> 01:53:56.740] Okay. Got it. So then what's this next part you were going to tell us about? [01:53:56.740 --> 01:54:09.300] Okay. So I showed the police while they were there that this was her camper. And they said, [01:54:09.300 --> 01:54:14.100] well, it wasn't civil now, because that was the third time they came on that day. They said, [01:54:14.100 --> 01:54:19.860] well, this is civil court now. Okay. So that's when we went through all of this and the [01:54:19.860 --> 01:54:34.420] went to circuit civil. Let's see. Now, one of the attorneys just kept wanting to withdraw and [01:54:35.780 --> 01:54:42.340] expansion of time is what he's had put on there. And then finally he ended up withdrawing totally. [01:54:42.340 --> 01:54:52.100] He got fired by the client. So, but in the interim, what he did is he complained about me being a POA. [01:54:53.060 --> 01:54:58.820] So that's a biggie that we need to take care of this evening. And the judge concurred. [01:55:00.260 --> 01:55:06.580] Nobody has said anything up until he came on the scene. And he reported me to the police. [01:55:06.580 --> 01:55:13.460] Nobody has said anything up until he came on the scene and he reported me to the Florida bar also, [01:55:13.460 --> 01:55:21.300] which that's another story. I'm taking care of that. So now we're at the point where [01:55:23.380 --> 01:55:35.140] in my complaint, I had put in a section that dealt with the civil theft. I'm calling it civil theft [01:55:35.140 --> 01:55:44.660] or the theft that they did. And the judge a couple of months ago told me to take that out [01:55:44.660 --> 01:55:53.140] and readdress it. And I guess I understood as an issue, write up another case, which I did, [01:55:53.140 --> 01:55:59.220] but then I was told that was wrong and he's going to bring it into this court. But what I did is I [01:55:59.220 --> 01:56:09.780] did what he said. I rewrote a civil demand letter. Okay. Now that it's been 30 days now, [01:56:09.780 --> 01:56:19.540] but I wrote the civil demand letter for treble the charges of the first one. And right now we're [01:56:19.540 --> 01:56:29.700] getting ready to, well, I'm, I want to address the POA and I want to address the civil theft demand [01:56:29.700 --> 01:56:38.740] letter. In addition, since there are, since there is the trust and the primary beneficiary [01:56:39.540 --> 01:56:45.940] and the property manager who now has, let's say become my friend, if you want to call it that. [01:56:45.940 --> 01:56:54.740] I want to go into court and say, you know, Hey, there's the $78,000 that is owed. Nobody [01:56:54.740 --> 01:57:02.500] responded in two years. Nobody's not tried to negotiate, responded, called me. I want you to [01:57:02.500 --> 01:57:11.060] make a ruling on this. And I don't know if that's the right thing to do. But who is going to end up [01:57:11.060 --> 01:57:18.180] paying for this? I want the judge to decide, is it going to be the trustee from the trust? Or is [01:57:18.180 --> 01:57:28.580] it, or am I supposed to be addressing the primary beneficiary help? There's a lot more to this, [01:57:28.580 --> 01:57:32.660] but at least if I get those couple of things taken care of, that would be wonderful. [01:57:32.660 --> 01:57:42.820] Wow. A lot to unpack there. So nobody wanted to take any of this. There's so many different facets [01:57:42.820 --> 01:57:50.900] of it. I've gone to all kinds of attorneys. I've asked for pro bono. I've gone to legal aid. I went [01:57:50.900 --> 01:57:58.340] to the mayor, right? Oh yeah. A grand theft report. I went to the mayor. I went to the [01:57:58.340 --> 01:58:06.100] mayor. Right. Oh yeah. A grand theft report. I did everything I could and finally got a [01:58:06.660 --> 01:58:14.820] grand theft report written up. Of course, they can't say who did it because nobody saw them do it. [01:58:16.180 --> 01:58:24.740] Okay. Because it was on their property. Did your daughter get the RV and everything back at this [01:58:24.740 --> 01:58:33.700] point? Or is it still sitting in some impound lot or what? Oh wow. That's why I filed a civil theft [01:58:33.700 --> 01:58:43.540] because what they did is they called it abandoned on the- Oh no. Oh my goodness. Well, okay. So [01:58:43.540 --> 01:58:48.340] there's some more we're going to have to unpack on the other side of the sponsors. Hold on Vivian, [01:58:48.340 --> 01:58:53.220] we'll be right back. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [01:58:53.220 --> 01:58:58.820] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations [01:58:58.820 --> 01:59:04.580] try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of [01:59:04.580 --> 01:59:11.780] the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and [01:59:11.780 --> 01:59:18.660] accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound [01:59:18.660 --> 01:59:24.500] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word [01:59:24.500 --> 01:59:30.180] beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free [01:59:30.180 --> 01:59:36.180] recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours [01:59:36.180 --> 01:59:47.220] just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [01:59:47.220 --> 02:00:00.020] That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.