[00:00.000 --> 00:05.800] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.800 --> 00:09.480] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.480 --> 00:10.920] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.920 --> 00:14.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.880 --> 00:17.100] your First Amendment rights. [00:17.100 --> 00:18.680] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.680 --> 00:22.300] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.300 --> 00:27.080] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [00:27.080 --> 00:28.520] So protect your rights. [00:28.520 --> 00:32.240] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.240 --> 00:33.240] Privacy. [00:33.240 --> 00:34.840] It's worth hanging on to. [00:34.840 --> 00:39.120] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [00:39.120 --> 00:42.660] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.660 --> 00:45.960] Start over with StartPage. [00:45.960 --> 00:50.000] Most of us know that taking the Fifth means you're choosing to remain silent about a criminal [00:50.000 --> 00:51.000] matter. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.800] It's a good way to remember that the Fifth Amendment spells out what can and can't happen [00:54.800 --> 00:57.360] to you when you're accused of a criminal offense. [00:57.360 --> 01:01.600] The Fifth guarantees due process, prohibits trying someone more than once for the same [01:01.600 --> 01:04.180] crime, and lets you keep your mouth shut. [01:04.180 --> 01:09.280] The Founding Fathers inserted these constitutional provisions to protect citizens from torture. [01:09.280 --> 01:13.760] Back in the day, governments often used painful methods to extract confessions. [01:13.760 --> 01:17.680] The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the government from taking your house and land without paying [01:17.680 --> 01:18.680] you for it. [01:18.680 --> 01:20.040] That used to happen a lot, too. [01:20.040 --> 01:21.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:21.840 --> 01:31.760] For news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.760 --> 01:35.160] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:35.160 --> 01:39.200] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:39.200 --> 01:40.680] Our liberty depends on it. [01:40.680 --> 01:44.540] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:44.540 --> 01:47.560] one of your constitutional rights. [01:47.560 --> 01:49.140] Privacy is under attack. [01:49.140 --> 01:52.740] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:52.740 --> 01:57.520] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:57.520 --> 02:02.600] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:02.600 --> 02:05.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:05.280 --> 02:09.560] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:09.560 --> 02:13.120] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:13.120 --> 02:16.040] Start over with StartPage. [02:16.040 --> 02:18.840] The number 666 reminds me of evil. [02:18.840 --> 02:23.520] I also associate it with the sick feeling one might get when falsely accused of a heinous [02:23.520 --> 02:27.840] crime, or when thinking about sickos who actually do commit acts of murder and mayhem. [02:27.840 --> 02:33.640] Either way, the number 666 can help you remember that the Sixth Amendment deals with the constitutionally [02:33.640 --> 02:36.920] guaranteed rights Americans have in a criminal trial. [02:36.920 --> 02:41.200] Those include the right to a speedy public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the [02:41.200 --> 02:45.200] right to full information about the charges, the right to an attorney, and the right to [02:45.200 --> 02:47.840] confront any witnesses face to face. [02:47.840 --> 02:51.520] 666, sick, sickos, and the Sixth Amendment. [02:51.520 --> 02:52.520] Get it? [02:52.520 --> 02:53.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:53.720 --> 03:22.280] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:54.720 --> 04:08.560] on this the first day of June 2023, this Thursday the first day of June 2023. [04:08.560 --> 04:11.800] And I'm going to start out, I've got the phone lines on. [04:11.800 --> 04:22.320] So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call, a call in number 512-646-1984. [04:22.320 --> 04:24.280] And I've been working on my questionnaires. [04:24.280 --> 04:29.880] I've only got a million five to work on. [04:29.880 --> 04:31.680] That shouldn't take too long. [04:31.680 --> 04:33.160] Only a million five. [04:33.160 --> 04:41.080] Yes, been all week working on the underlying HTML code. [04:41.080 --> 04:48.760] But I forgot I had the programmer rework the system so it no longer uses the HTML code. [04:48.760 --> 04:53.880] Oh, that was really annoying. [04:53.880 --> 05:00.600] And I got through two or three really long questionnaires and I found I had some errors [05:00.600 --> 05:03.760] in the code. [05:03.760 --> 05:09.720] And so I loaded one up and ran it to make sure it worked and it worked. [05:09.720 --> 05:14.520] And I looked in the code and the code was all messed up. [05:14.520 --> 05:19.360] That's when I remembered I had even changed the program so it doesn't use the code anymore. [05:19.360 --> 05:23.440] Oh, that was not good. [05:23.440 --> 05:27.120] All that time working on it and I forgot. [05:27.120 --> 05:35.880] But they'll go quickly now with this new process. [05:35.880 --> 05:42.320] And I'm hoping that within two weeks I'll have a working sample up. [05:42.320 --> 05:46.680] I don't have all of the penal code mapped out yet. [05:46.680 --> 05:49.720] I've only got about half of it. [05:49.720 --> 05:54.960] But I do have traffic and due process. [05:54.960 --> 05:56.200] And that is by far the biggest. [05:56.200 --> 06:03.160] The penal codes are about half a dozen questions each so they should go pretty quick. [06:03.160 --> 06:14.040] And which reminds me, you know, last time we talked about the asset forfeiture scam [06:14.040 --> 06:22.600] going on in Victoria County and I suspect something similar is going on everywhere. [06:22.600 --> 06:27.320] Maybe not quite as sinister as there. [06:27.320 --> 06:32.720] But Brett, did you hear about the recent case of a woman in Kenny? [06:32.720 --> 06:36.020] And I had talked to this woman when this stuff happened to her. [06:36.020 --> 06:40.080] She called into the show and we talked to her. [06:40.080 --> 06:49.520] And the police, someone barricaded their self in one of a house that she was renting. [06:49.520 --> 06:52.640] And the police went in and tore it all to pieces. [06:52.640 --> 06:57.080] And then she went to the city to get it repaired and the city told her to go scratch. [06:57.080 --> 07:03.800] But the police were just doing their job and they have immunity. [07:03.800 --> 07:08.080] And this has been going on for a long time in Texas and all over the country. [07:08.080 --> 07:13.640] Yeah, they just ransack whatever they want to destroy everything and then oops, that's [07:13.640 --> 07:14.640] your problem. [07:14.640 --> 07:15.640] Yeah. [07:15.640 --> 07:27.040] And so this lawyer who was actually thinking, I know thinking and lawyer in the same sentence [07:27.040 --> 07:38.200] tends to be an oxymoron, but on occasion he took them on for imminent domain. [07:38.200 --> 07:49.360] Imminent domain in the city came in and took her property for a city purpose. [07:49.360 --> 07:55.700] And instead of going after the officers, the officers were there at the behest of the city. [07:55.700 --> 08:03.840] So this was sued as an improper taking. [08:03.840 --> 08:09.600] The Fifth Circuit agreed to it and this article I read said that everybody else is telling [08:09.600 --> 08:14.080] them don't appeal, don't appeal. [08:14.080 --> 08:18.080] Because it's only the Fifth Circuit now. [08:18.080 --> 08:24.960] If you appeal it and the Supreme agrees, then it screws everybody. [08:24.960 --> 08:36.160] But I was looking at this and we talked about Dr. Joe's case last week about the asset forfeiture. [08:36.160 --> 08:39.160] That's the same thing. [08:39.160 --> 08:45.120] That's an improper taking by the county. [08:45.120 --> 08:52.640] So I was looking at suing to get back Dr. Joe's airplane and they could do that under [08:52.640 --> 08:54.900] improper taking. [08:54.900 --> 09:04.720] He took his airplane and then they said he could have it back, but he was in a physical [09:04.720 --> 09:11.200] state where he couldn't get it and they abandoned it on an airport and someone stole it. [09:11.200 --> 09:17.480] So we're holding them responsible for stealing the airplanes. [09:17.480 --> 09:19.680] We don't care what happened to it. [09:19.680 --> 09:26.800] You were responsible for it and you didn't give it back so it was improper taking. [09:26.800 --> 09:28.040] They said, well, we released it. [09:28.040 --> 09:29.880] Yeah, but you didn't give it back to him. [09:29.880 --> 09:32.360] You took it away from him. [09:32.360 --> 09:33.840] You didn't give it back to him. [09:33.840 --> 09:34.840] Released? [09:34.840 --> 09:35.840] What good does that do? [09:35.840 --> 09:42.360] Yeah, told him to go find it, but by then it had been stolen. [09:42.360 --> 09:50.440] So we'll call that an improper taking and that'll give us a shot at getting the city [09:50.440 --> 09:55.520] to write us a deal, at least on the airplane and his assets. [09:55.520 --> 10:02.720] He had over $100,000 worth of assets, the airplane and gold and silver and other stuff. [10:02.720 --> 10:07.880] He didn't get any of it back. [10:07.880 --> 10:12.640] So we'll sue for all of that under the improper taking. [10:12.640 --> 10:14.680] This is going to be great. [10:14.680 --> 10:20.560] Yeah, it's a good angle to pick for that because otherwise they're looking at, hey, you caused [10:20.560 --> 10:23.480] certain damage and then they say, oh, but we have governmental immunity. [10:23.480 --> 10:25.960] We were just doing our job. [10:25.960 --> 10:34.160] And he's taking this other angle of imminent domain and I think that's really smart. [10:34.160 --> 10:36.280] But it worked. [10:36.280 --> 10:45.760] I guess odd how that's been sitting there for 200 years and it just never occurred to [10:45.760 --> 10:46.760] anyone. [10:46.760 --> 10:47.760] And what did she get? [10:47.760 --> 10:53.280] Like it was $60,000 that the city had to pay to her? [10:53.280 --> 10:56.240] Something like that, yeah. [10:56.240 --> 11:00.120] When I was looking at, she asked for 70, but I didn't see what they actually paid. [11:00.120 --> 11:04.080] It wasn't in the article I was reading. [11:04.080 --> 11:15.160] But she did get, she did win the case and set a precedent that every other state's terrified [11:15.160 --> 11:19.560] they're going to get it set in their state and they're going to get them the same suits [11:19.560 --> 11:20.920] in their states anyway. [11:20.920 --> 11:22.560] Oh, you know it. [11:22.560 --> 11:23.560] Yeah. [11:23.560 --> 11:28.720] They kicked this door open. [11:28.720 --> 11:29.720] So that's- [11:29.720 --> 11:32.720] They knocked the fence down. [11:32.720 --> 11:33.720] Yeah. [11:33.720 --> 11:36.280] So I was really, really pleased to hear that. [11:36.280 --> 11:40.400] So things are going pretty good here. [11:40.400 --> 11:49.520] The questionnaire is shaping up it could change the way the courts do things. [11:49.520 --> 11:57.940] If I can convince the local county court, county commissioner's court, that this will [11:57.940 --> 12:06.360] save them in a court appointed council costs and get them to pressure the sheriff to make [12:06.360 --> 12:07.360] this available to everybody. [12:07.360 --> 12:12.760] And if I get the county judge to do it, they really won't have an option because the judge [12:12.760 --> 12:19.080] can do it himself when they come to his court and ask for court appointed council, as this [12:19.080 --> 12:21.120] always has to go through a court. [12:21.120 --> 12:25.440] Now the district court may be a little harder. [12:25.440 --> 12:35.760] The district judge hates me, probably sued him a couple of times and only filed a small [12:35.760 --> 12:40.520] handful of criminal complaints against him. [12:40.520 --> 12:48.400] But maybe I can win him over with my great personality, my big smile. [12:48.400 --> 12:50.820] Yeah, maybe. [12:50.820 --> 12:51.820] Maybe not. [12:51.820 --> 12:55.920] But if I get the county, that'll be enough. [12:55.920 --> 13:01.760] Once I get the county court doing this, then they'll probably, if it works out for them, [13:01.760 --> 13:08.720] the lawyers in the county will pressure the district judge to do it because they'll be [13:08.720 --> 13:12.320] getting solicitations for representation. [13:12.320 --> 13:16.360] They'd be getting clients contacting them. [13:16.360 --> 13:21.800] Yeah, that's actually, that'd work out well for them. [13:21.800 --> 13:26.080] I'm hoping it does. [13:26.080 --> 13:34.360] If it does, then the only thing I need to get this thing financed is to be able to show [13:34.360 --> 13:37.360] that people will pay for it. [13:37.360 --> 13:45.000] So if I get it going in Wise County, I'll be sending these to lawyers in Tarrant and [13:45.000 --> 13:52.360] Dallas County as well, they'll begin to see this and it's very likely to spread relatively [13:52.360 --> 13:53.360] quickly. [13:53.360 --> 13:58.640] Once I have the questionnaire up and working, I could put it all over the state of Texas [13:58.640 --> 14:01.960] in a heartbeat. [14:01.960 --> 14:12.920] So then I get the lawyers to pay me so much a month to be on my lists. [14:12.920 --> 14:18.240] That gives me considerable passive income. [14:18.240 --> 14:19.240] Very cool. [14:19.240 --> 14:25.840] Then I won't know you guys when I get to feel wealthy rich. [14:25.840 --> 14:28.200] You're going to forget all of us little people. [14:28.200 --> 14:33.760] Red who? [14:33.760 --> 14:37.520] So what have you been up to lately? [14:37.520 --> 14:40.120] Well I have a lesson in what not to do. [14:40.120 --> 14:43.920] Do you like to hear about that? [14:43.920 --> 14:47.880] Yes I would. [14:47.880 --> 14:49.320] So here's the thing. [14:49.320 --> 14:57.600] Number one, don't sit on a document that you need to write and just think, oh, I'll [14:57.600 --> 15:04.120] be able to do that and you keep helping everybody else with their urgent, urgent issues. [15:04.120 --> 15:07.460] So that's number one. [15:07.460 --> 15:16.160] Number two, don't write the document, stayed up late three nights in a row, just burning [15:16.160 --> 15:21.160] the midnight oil, working through the wee hours and I got this document where I think [15:21.160 --> 15:22.160] it's ready. [15:22.160 --> 15:25.640] And then I'm like, how many days do I have? [15:25.640 --> 15:29.400] I think I have, it's either, I don't know, I need to go look at that. [15:29.400 --> 15:34.120] If it was 28, then that was yesterday, but if it's 30, I still have until tomorrow. [15:34.120 --> 15:35.120] So that'd be good. [15:35.120 --> 15:36.120] I went and looked again. [15:36.120 --> 15:41.640] Okay, so it says I have 40 days, but right underneath the 40 days, it tells all these [15:41.640 --> 15:45.360] details of what the document needs to contain. [15:45.360 --> 15:50.440] This is my federal appellate brief and it's going from the federal district court to the [15:50.440 --> 15:52.920] federal circuit court. [15:52.920 --> 15:59.720] And so I'm finding out at the tail end of my 40 days, I've got now another week now, [15:59.720 --> 16:03.040] and I'm finding out at the tail end of it that I'm supposed to write all these, I need [16:03.040 --> 16:08.680] to include pieces of all the documents that I'm trying to reference in there. [16:08.680 --> 16:15.200] I need to hyperlink everything and I need to do all these details with the document [16:15.200 --> 16:19.680] that's a pain. [16:19.680 --> 16:32.280] I have a template for an appellate brief with the table of contents and table of authorities. [16:32.280 --> 16:37.200] Let's pick this up on the other side. [16:37.200 --> 16:41.640] It's got to be, the numbering, the hardest thing for me was the numbering, because the [16:41.640 --> 16:42.640] first... [16:42.640 --> 16:46.840] Footnotes and hyperlink back and forth to the footnotes and yeah. [16:46.840 --> 16:49.840] I didn't use any footnotes at all. [16:49.840 --> 16:54.520] Where I'd put a footnote, I'd put in a quote, heck with that footnote crap, that's not too [16:54.520 --> 16:55.520] complicated. [16:55.520 --> 17:00.240] Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back. [17:00.240 --> 17:06.280] Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [17:06.280 --> 17:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.000 --> 17:16.600] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:16.600 --> 17:23.040] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [17:23.040 --> 17:25.320] provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.320 --> 17:30.320] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [17:30.320 --> 17:31.320] we reject. [17:31.320 --> 17:36.560] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [17:36.560 --> 17:39.400] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:39.400 --> 17:45.680] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [17:45.680 --> 17:47.320] quality radio. [17:47.320 --> 17:51.640] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.640 --> 17:56.880] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [17:56.880 --> 17:58.840] increase your income. [17:58.840 --> 18:01.000] Order now. [18:01.000 --> 18:05.360] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [18:05.360 --> 18:06.360] Word? [18:06.360 --> 18:11.520] Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture [18:11.520 --> 18:17.920] Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [18:17.920 --> 18:22.440] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly [18:22.440 --> 18:24.720] dividing the word of truth. [18:24.720 --> 18:28.480] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go [18:28.480 --> 18:32.160] verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [18:32.160 --> 18:36.800] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [18:36.800 --> 18:39.160] and Christian character development. [18:39.160 --> 18:43.680] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:43.680 --> 18:48.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [18:48.000 --> 18:50.280] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.280 --> 18:56.920] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [18:56.920 --> 19:00.920] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [19:00.920 --> 19:15.240] Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [19:15.240 --> 19:32.480] Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [19:32.480 --> 19:52.840] Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [19:52.840 --> 20:13.200] Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [20:13.200 --> 20:33.280] Okay, we are back. [20:33.280 --> 20:38.200] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and we're just talking [20:38.200 --> 20:43.560] about a lesson in what not to do. [20:43.560 --> 20:45.640] Don't do like what I did. [20:45.640 --> 20:51.160] I helped everybody with their issues, their urgent issues, and I didn't look, and I knew [20:51.160 --> 20:57.200] I had a document I need to go from the Federal District Court and appeal to the Federal Circuit [20:57.200 --> 21:03.600] Court, but I figured these people have real urgent issues. [21:03.600 --> 21:06.720] I mean, I'm not facing any jail time. [21:06.720 --> 21:13.960] I'm not facing immediate extradition, imminent, all kinds of problems of families being ripped [21:13.960 --> 21:19.000] apart and everything, and if there's anything I can do, my document keeps getting later [21:19.000 --> 21:20.000] and later. [21:20.000 --> 21:25.800] Well, that's one problem, but the other problem is I didn't look at the requirements early [21:25.800 --> 21:26.800] on. [21:26.800 --> 21:31.840] I did, but then I got distracted with other things, and I couldn't really remember what [21:31.840 --> 21:34.320] I had read about how many days. [21:34.320 --> 21:41.000] I think I have 21 or 30 days or something, I don't know, but then I also saw 40 days. [21:41.000 --> 21:46.480] Oh, I sure hope it wasn't that line about the 14, but I just kept doing other people's [21:46.480 --> 21:54.920] stuff, helping with their whatever was urgent, and so I go to look after I wrote my document, [21:54.920 --> 22:01.160] I go to look at the requirements, and I see that I do have 40 days, so that's good. [22:01.160 --> 22:06.280] I'm not going to be late, but I also have to include a whole bunch of stuff. [22:06.280 --> 22:12.480] They actually want all of the pleadings that were in the previous case if I'm going to [22:12.480 --> 22:17.360] refer to anything from district to circuit, so that's kind of a pain. [22:17.360 --> 22:20.640] I was giving them a hard time all along the way, so I've got a lot of paperwork that [22:20.640 --> 22:24.480] they're going to have to read if we're going to address all of the issues, right? [22:24.480 --> 22:30.520] So it's going to be a big deal, but yeah, don't do what I did and wait until the last [22:30.520 --> 22:36.000] minute on your own stuff, and then figure out what the requirements are. [22:36.000 --> 22:42.160] Look at the requirements first, see how much time you have to do it, and prioritize it [22:42.160 --> 22:46.160] so that you can get your own stuff done too. [22:46.160 --> 22:51.560] Anyway, that's my suggestion about what to not do. [22:51.560 --> 22:52.560] Don't do it like I did. [22:52.560 --> 22:59.160] I'm still going to get this in on time, but it would have been better all around if I [22:59.160 --> 23:00.560] had done mine first. [23:00.560 --> 23:04.360] All right, so we've got our phones are open. [23:04.360 --> 23:05.760] Our caller lines are ready. [23:05.760 --> 23:10.760] If you want to call in, it is 512-646-1984. [23:10.760 --> 23:11.760] 512-646-1984. [23:11.760 --> 23:21.000] Randy, have you ever gotten yourself in a situation where you're working on somebody [23:21.000 --> 23:26.720] else's stuff and you don't get a chance to work on your own? [23:26.720 --> 23:28.720] Has that ever happened to you? [23:28.720 --> 23:35.600] I once had a sergeant on the Department of Public Safety smash me in the wall and knock [23:35.600 --> 23:37.320] my tooth out. [23:37.320 --> 23:44.160] I never got around to suing him because I was helping everybody else. [23:44.160 --> 23:49.840] I've had three or four suits of my own that I didn't get to because I was helping everybody [23:49.840 --> 23:53.240] else. [23:53.240 --> 24:00.800] And Deborah made a comment once in an email to someone that I took to heart. [24:00.800 --> 24:08.440] It said, your lack of preparation does not create an emergency for me. [24:08.440 --> 24:15.400] And I started paying more attention to that. [24:15.400 --> 24:20.200] Brett and I both, we get people coming to us, oh, they're going to throw me in jail [24:20.200 --> 24:21.200] tomorrow. [24:21.200 --> 24:22.200] What can I do? [24:22.200 --> 24:23.200] You've got to help me. [24:23.200 --> 24:26.880] And I say, no, I can't help you. [24:26.880 --> 24:31.920] If you came to me last week or last month, I might be able to help you. [24:31.920 --> 24:37.640] But you go to everybody else first and then when it's absolutely the last possible second [24:37.640 --> 24:45.960] you come to me and ask me to drop my life and dig you out of this hole you dug for yourself. [24:45.960 --> 24:51.360] Maybe I'm getting old and maybe I'm getting jaded. [24:51.360 --> 24:58.680] But I have, I still help people, but not like I used to. [24:58.680 --> 25:07.440] What I'm doing now is trying to get some things done that will give everybody new tools to [25:07.440 --> 25:09.880] work with. [25:09.880 --> 25:22.440] The suit I have before the federal court against Travis County is designed to get the court [25:22.440 --> 25:30.640] of criminal appeals judges to change the training of magistrates and police so it's in line [25:30.640 --> 25:39.120] with the black litter law and code of criminal procedure. [25:39.120 --> 25:44.080] If I get that done, then I've helped everybody. [25:44.080 --> 25:47.840] There's three things in there I'm going after. [25:47.840 --> 25:58.400] One of them is the 1617 issue where if you are not brought before a magistrate for an [25:58.400 --> 26:04.920] examining trial and there is no order showing or finding a probable cause in the record [26:04.920 --> 26:13.160] within 48 hours you have the statute says the accused shall be discharged. [26:13.160 --> 26:19.000] Now that dictates a judicial determination, but it's never been challenged like the Speedy [26:19.000 --> 26:21.080] Trial Act was. [26:21.080 --> 26:25.000] So that's still very much entrenched in black litter law. [26:25.000 --> 26:29.960] The second one is the Speedy Trial Act. [26:29.960 --> 26:43.000] I'm asking the courts to distinguish Barker Wingo as it applies to the state of Texas. [26:43.000 --> 26:50.320] Barker Wingo says that if you want a right to a Speedy Trial you have to demand it. [26:50.320 --> 26:57.520] And I'm saying I'm not going to challenge whether or not that's true in the Fed, but [26:57.520 --> 27:01.440] it certainly is not true in the state of Texas. [27:01.440 --> 27:08.000] State of Texas says nothing about, the Constitution doesn't say anything about you have a right [27:08.000 --> 27:11.520] to a Speedy Trial if you demand it. [27:11.520 --> 27:14.200] That's not what it says. [27:14.200 --> 27:18.280] It says public officials shall provide a Speedy Trial. [27:18.280 --> 27:21.760] Does not say may, might, or can if they want to. [27:21.760 --> 27:25.920] And all these public officials soar in their oath, they'd abide by the Constitution, they'd [27:25.920 --> 27:28.040] protect the Constitution. [27:28.040 --> 27:32.080] We can't protect the Constitution while breaching it. [27:32.080 --> 27:40.160] So they agreed to do all of these things the Constitution tells them to do. [27:40.160 --> 27:42.520] One of them is to provide a Speedy Trial. [27:42.520 --> 27:45.560] Doesn't say anything about whether we ask for it or not. [27:45.560 --> 27:51.440] Doesn't even say anything about whether we want one or not. [27:51.440 --> 27:54.160] They're required to provide it. [27:54.160 --> 27:57.680] And they're making all these laws to make adjudication easier. [27:57.680 --> 28:04.280] They're saying, well, you know, in court cases, things come up and it takes time. [28:04.280 --> 28:07.560] Your problem, not my problem. [28:07.560 --> 28:09.520] Get yourself busy. [28:09.520 --> 28:11.640] Get this done. [28:11.640 --> 28:14.720] The law is clear on what you're to do. [28:14.720 --> 28:20.280] Just because it's difficult, if this were easy, somebody else would be doing it. [28:20.280 --> 28:21.960] That's why you're in this position. [28:21.960 --> 28:24.960] Okay, that's two. [28:24.960 --> 28:29.360] Three is 15.09. [28:29.360 --> 28:39.320] In 15.09, if a magistrate is presented with a warrant, I'm sorry, if a magistrate is [28:39.320 --> 28:48.120] presented with a criminal affidavit, complete in accordance with 15.05, the magistrate shall [28:48.120 --> 28:50.480] issue a warrant forthwith. [28:50.480 --> 28:52.840] But part of that is hard to understand. [28:52.840 --> 28:59.320] Doesn't say anything about a determination of the sufficiency of the complaint. [28:59.320 --> 29:02.960] That has to be done later. [29:02.960 --> 29:05.880] He needs to issue the warrant forthwith. [29:05.880 --> 29:07.480] No discretion. [29:07.480 --> 29:09.120] That's the third thing. [29:09.120 --> 29:12.600] That's probably the most important. [29:12.600 --> 29:19.500] If we get that one, we will get all the rest. [29:19.500 --> 29:27.900] If I go down to observe a polling place, and I see someone do something that I have reason [29:27.900 --> 29:34.960] to believe is improper, I call the police, I file a complaint with the policeman. [29:34.960 --> 29:40.840] And the policeman is to give notice to some magistrate in accordance with 2.13 Code of [29:40.840 --> 29:41.840] Criminal Procedure. [29:41.840 --> 29:47.360] And if he gives notice in the form of my verified affidavit, the magistrate needs to issue a [29:47.360 --> 29:48.360] warrant forthwith. [29:48.360 --> 29:52.680] That person has to come before the court and explain himself. [29:52.680 --> 29:54.880] That'll change everything. [29:54.880 --> 30:01.600] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Weave Law Radio, we'll be right back. [30:01.600 --> 30:05.720] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. [30:05.720 --> 30:10.440] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your [30:10.440 --> 30:11.440] secrets. [30:11.440 --> 30:15.640] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details. [30:15.640 --> 30:17.240] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.240 --> 30:20.840] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.840 --> 30:25.600] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:25.600 --> 30:30.760] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.760 --> 30:33.360] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.360 --> 30:37.660] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:37.660 --> 30:41.200] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.200 --> 30:44.880] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.880 --> 30:49.640] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle [30:49.640 --> 30:50.920] your personal information. [30:50.920 --> 30:54.100] But what happens if it escapes their control? [30:54.100 --> 30:55.520] It's not an idle question. [30:55.520 --> 31:00.880] According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was [31:00.880 --> 31:03.680] breached by hackers in the last year. [31:03.680 --> 31:06.920] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [31:06.920 --> 31:11.820] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [31:11.820 --> 31:15.200] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals [31:15.200 --> 31:16.200] to see. [31:16.200 --> 31:17.200] The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.200 --> 31:20.840] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [31:20.840 --> 31:22.760] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:22.760 --> 31:30.480] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.480 --> 31:31.480] I lost my son. [31:31.480 --> 31:32.480] My nephew. [31:32.480 --> 31:33.480] My uncle. [31:33.480 --> 31:34.480] My son. [31:34.480 --> 31:35.480] On September 11, 2001. [31:35.480 --> 31:38.760] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:38.760 --> 31:39.760] World Trade Center 7. [31:39.760 --> 31:42.920] A 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. [31:42.920 --> 31:46.760] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. [31:46.760 --> 31:50.560] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence. [31:50.560 --> 31:52.520] And believe there is more to the story. [31:52.520 --> 31:53.960] Bring justice to my son. [31:53.960 --> 31:54.960] My uncle. [31:54.960 --> 31:55.960] My nephew. [31:55.960 --> 31:56.960] My son. [31:56.960 --> 31:57.960] Go to buildingwhat.org. [31:57.960 --> 32:00.800] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:00.800 --> 32:04.920] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:04.920 --> 32:07.240] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:07.240 --> 32:10.480] And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have [32:10.480 --> 32:12.720] to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.720 --> 32:15.920] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [32:15.920 --> 32:19.960] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.960 --> 32:23.800] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [32:23.800 --> 32:25.200] our rights through due process. [32:25.200 --> 32:28.800] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put [32:28.800 --> 32:32.320] together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what [32:32.320 --> 32:35.320] due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.320 --> 32:39.320] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [32:39.320 --> 32:40.640] ordering your copy today. [32:40.640 --> 32:44.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:44.000 --> 32:48.400] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [32:48.400 --> 32:50.720] documents and other useful resource material. [32:50.720 --> 32:54.680] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.680 --> 33:00.120] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:00.120 --> 33:04.200] Live, free speech radio. [33:04.200 --> 33:06.000] Logosradionetwork.com. [33:34.200 --> 34:04.120] So please Mr. Macklin, teach officers not to abuse the power, send a request to the [34:04.120 --> 34:12.120] captain of all officers, tell them to uphold the law, and please don't abuse the power. [34:12.120 --> 34:18.120] They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour. [34:18.120 --> 34:23.120] So Mr. Officer, please stop abusing your power. [34:23.120 --> 34:28.120] You pull me over and tell me to be silent, sir. [34:28.120 --> 34:33.120] I need to speak to my lawyer, Mr. Officer. [34:33.120 --> 34:41.720] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking about [34:41.720 --> 34:49.160] instead of helping everybody out of their immediate issues, I'm trying to lay the groundwork [34:49.160 --> 34:54.200] so we have more to work with. [34:54.200 --> 34:59.200] Now I went through what I did in my first suit, now I'm preparing a second one to sue [34:59.200 --> 35:04.920] Victoria County, and there I'm going to go after access to grand juries. [35:04.920 --> 35:12.520] I'm going to take a whole stack of criminal complaints and then contact the clerk and [35:12.520 --> 35:20.520] get the names of the grand jurors and then send my criminal complaints to the grand juries. [35:20.520 --> 35:24.920] Well they're not going to want to give me the names, so I'll do the standard routine [35:24.920 --> 35:30.320] of sending it to the prosecutor addressed to the grand jury, and with a cover letter [35:30.320 --> 35:36.840] that I won't get back, and then I'll sue the prosecutor. [35:36.840 --> 35:45.360] Because the prosecutor is interfering with access to the grand jury. [35:45.360 --> 35:48.880] What was it Brett, 28.051? [35:48.880 --> 35:49.880] Yeah. [35:49.880 --> 35:55.680] Okay, that's the duties of grand juries, it shall be the duty of the grand jury to [35:55.680 --> 36:04.120] investigate into all crimes subject to indictment, and that's felonies and misdemeanors, that [36:04.120 --> 36:10.000] come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury, the prosecuting attorney [36:10.000 --> 36:14.520] or any credible person. [36:14.520 --> 36:21.200] Credible person is defined in Texas law as a person over the age of majority, which is [36:21.200 --> 36:25.520] 18, and never been convicted of a felony. [36:25.520 --> 36:29.160] I am by statute a credible person. [36:29.160 --> 36:35.280] I don't care what my wife says, over and over. [36:35.280 --> 36:38.440] By statute I'm credible. [36:38.440 --> 36:42.360] She says you're under 18. [36:42.360 --> 36:45.880] Over 18, over 18. [36:45.880 --> 36:47.560] She says I act under 18. [36:47.560 --> 36:50.560] Oh, that's the difference, okay. [36:50.560 --> 36:54.720] Okay, so that's going to be the second thing I'm going to go after. [36:54.720 --> 37:03.480] I will go after the prosecutor and I'll then I'll petition for a declaratory judgment [37:03.480 --> 37:11.440] to declare that the prosecuting attorney has no power to intercede between a citizen and [37:11.440 --> 37:13.800] giving notice of crime to the grand jury. [37:13.800 --> 37:16.800] Then that opens the grand jury to us. [37:16.800 --> 37:19.360] So that's what I'm after. [37:19.360 --> 37:21.880] And we've got three callers on the board. [37:21.880 --> 37:24.000] So I'm going to go ahead and go to our callers. [37:24.000 --> 37:29.640] We've got Ted in California, hello Ted, what do you have for us today? [37:29.640 --> 37:40.800] Howdy, howdy, and since you guys haven't done it, it's Thursday night, June 1st [37:40.800 --> 37:41.800] of 2023. [37:41.800 --> 37:46.520] Oh, this guy is stealing my thunder. [37:46.520 --> 37:56.800] I only do that, it's just a half hour, I only do that on the top of the hour, unless I forget. [37:56.800 --> 37:59.360] So we did that, we did that starting out. [37:59.360 --> 38:03.640] Okay, it's the first of June. [38:03.640 --> 38:04.640] I missed the first call. [38:04.640 --> 38:07.240] Okay Ted, get back into your place. [38:07.240 --> 38:13.520] All right, I missed the first couple of minutes, my bad. [38:13.520 --> 38:17.000] But you were talking about, I think, an imminent domain thing. [38:17.000 --> 38:25.920] And I sent you a YouTube video about that very case where someone is explaining how [38:25.920 --> 38:32.480] this woman, her house was trashed by the police and she- [38:32.480 --> 38:36.520] Yeah, and I knew this woman. [38:36.520 --> 38:40.440] She had called into our show right after this happened. [38:40.440 --> 38:41.440] Wow. [38:41.440 --> 38:54.960] Okay, and then I'll quickly move on to Brett, I feel you, and it's just something we do [38:54.960 --> 39:05.600] and we take care of people and put ourselves, not first, but you know, a motion for enlargement [39:05.600 --> 39:11.760] of time, especially if it's the first request, is usually always granted and you could get [39:11.760 --> 39:18.280] that in tomorrow and give yourself even some more breathing room. [39:18.280 --> 39:23.460] And you would probably have an answer back on a motion for enlargement of time before [39:23.460 --> 39:28.960] the due date, so you'd know either way if you have to go with whatever you've got at [39:28.960 --> 39:29.960] that moment. [39:29.960 --> 39:30.960] Yeah. [39:30.960 --> 39:36.280] We filed it in Arizona, I helped a woman file in Arizona. [39:36.280 --> 39:42.880] The lawyers put in a request for an enlargement of time and before we had time to answer it [39:42.880 --> 39:46.020] like two days, the judge granted it. [39:46.020 --> 39:52.360] So we didn't have time to agree or disagree, the judge just gave it to them. [39:52.360 --> 39:55.040] Yeah, I appreciate that, Ted. [39:55.040 --> 39:59.200] I think in this situation, I'm not gonna do that and here's why. [39:59.200 --> 40:06.680] One of the issues that I'm bringing, that I brought to the district court, see the defendants [40:06.680 --> 40:12.280] didn't answer timely, they had 21 days, right, they didn't answer. [40:12.280 --> 40:23.000] On the night of the last day that they could answer, there was a document e-filed, which [40:23.000 --> 40:29.680] actually by rules is not allowed, it was a request for an extension of time or an application [40:29.680 --> 40:31.880] for extension of time. [40:31.880 --> 40:38.000] But that's not allowed unless it's unopposed, which means that they would have had to have [40:38.000 --> 40:42.080] a meet and confer and they didn't do that. [40:42.080 --> 40:46.080] And they're trying to say, oh, well, you don't have to have a meet and confer because proceeds [40:46.080 --> 40:50.800] are not required to meet and confer, but that's not the point. [40:50.800 --> 40:55.440] The point is, they can't slide something in there and pretend like it's unopposed. [40:55.440 --> 40:59.880] They actually even, when you e-file, you can control what the title of it is. [40:59.880 --> 41:03.020] They called it granted. [41:03.020 --> 41:09.920] So it looks like if you pull up on Pacer, it looks like it was already granted and they [41:09.920 --> 41:14.440] just tried all these little trickery, little stuff to make themselves have an extension [41:14.440 --> 41:15.440] of time. [41:15.440 --> 41:18.700] And it wasn't even the defendant who filed. [41:18.700 --> 41:24.260] It was some random law firm that had not appeared as counsel. [41:24.260 --> 41:25.880] Nothing had been filed. [41:25.880 --> 41:26.880] So nothing was timely. [41:26.880 --> 41:27.880] There was no answer. [41:27.880 --> 41:32.640] I had a right to default judgment and the next day they're sitting on a default judgment [41:32.640 --> 41:44.200] motion and they denied it as moot because the other side was imagined to have more time. [41:44.200 --> 41:50.520] It was like somehow automatically granted without any actual judge looking at it. [41:50.520 --> 41:56.000] So that issue of an extension of time could be kind of touchy since that's what I'm giving [41:56.000 --> 41:59.280] them a hard time about. [41:59.280 --> 42:00.280] That's not the only thing. [42:00.280 --> 42:09.480] I'm giving them 73 objections to their report and recommendations. [42:09.480 --> 42:13.160] Not the least of which is that there's no such thing as a report and recommendations [42:13.160 --> 42:15.280] authorized. [42:15.280 --> 42:19.440] If there had been a referral to a magistrate judge, then there would be something authorized [42:19.440 --> 42:23.920] called findings of fact and recommendations. [42:23.920 --> 42:29.520] Well, the findings of fact require them to hold evidentiary hearings, which they didn't [42:29.520 --> 42:30.520] do. [42:30.520 --> 42:35.520] So to issue something else called a report and recommendations wasn't authorized even [42:35.520 --> 42:38.440] if they had a referral, which they didn't. [42:38.440 --> 42:43.320] So it's a bunch of technical stuff that I'm picking them to pieces about the technical [42:43.320 --> 42:44.320] stuff. [42:44.320 --> 42:47.760] I don't think I want to go walk in there and go, hey, I don't really know what I'm doing. [42:47.760 --> 42:52.920] Can you give me a little more time? [42:52.920 --> 42:56.960] Even if you don't really know what you're doing, you still don't want to say that. [42:56.960 --> 42:57.960] Exactly. [42:57.960 --> 43:07.360] Well, the other thing I would have suggested is when they defiled this granted extension [43:07.360 --> 43:12.920] of time, I would have immediately moved to strike that for the reasons you already stated, [43:12.920 --> 43:17.280] including they're not counsel in the case. [43:17.280 --> 43:22.520] And so they were standing to even file that. [43:22.520 --> 43:23.520] And it wasn't signed. [43:23.520 --> 43:26.440] It was for a number of reasons, which yes, you're right. [43:26.440 --> 43:30.720] I did raise. [43:30.720 --> 43:35.520] And I'm sure you did a bunch of bar complaints, right? [43:35.520 --> 43:40.840] Oh yeah, that was the fun part. [43:40.840 --> 43:42.800] Brett filed bar complaints? [43:42.800 --> 43:43.800] Okay. [43:43.800 --> 43:49.040] Yeah, I bar grieved the lawyers who were actually the defendants, even though they weren't the [43:49.040 --> 43:53.120] ones that did what their skin key representatives did. [43:53.120 --> 43:55.120] And I bar grieved the representatives. [43:55.120 --> 43:59.800] We'll be right back. [43:59.800 --> 44:00.800] I love logos. [44:00.800 --> 44:04.120] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [44:04.120 --> 44:06.960] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [44:06.960 --> 44:08.120] I need my truth fixed. [44:08.120 --> 44:10.160] I'd be lost without logos. [44:10.160 --> 44:12.880] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [44:12.880 --> 44:16.640] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't [44:16.640 --> 44:20.000] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [44:20.000 --> 44:21.400] How can I help logos? [44:21.400 --> 44:23.560] Well, I'm glad you asked. [44:23.560 --> 44:26.280] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [44:26.280 --> 44:29.080] You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts. [44:29.080 --> 44:31.040] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [44:31.040 --> 44:37.400] Now go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [44:37.400 --> 44:43.080] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [44:43.080 --> 44:44.080] Do I pay extra? [44:44.080 --> 44:45.080] No. [44:45.080 --> 44:46.720] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [44:46.720 --> 44:47.720] No. [44:47.720 --> 44:48.720] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [44:48.720 --> 44:49.720] No. [44:49.720 --> 44:50.720] I mean, yes. [44:50.720 --> 44:51.720] Wow. [44:51.720 --> 44:55.520] Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [44:55.520 --> 44:56.520] Thank you so much. [44:56.520 --> 44:58.240] We are welcome. [44:58.240 --> 44:59.720] Happy holidays, logos. [44:59.720 --> 45:04.040] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.040 --> 45:10.800] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [45:10.800 --> 45:13.960] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:13.960 --> 45:18.560] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.560 --> 45:22.800] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.800 --> 45:27.640] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too. [45:27.640 --> 45:34.440] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [45:34.440 --> 45:38.880] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [45:38.880 --> 45:43.280] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.280 --> 45:49.440] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.440 --> 45:52.240] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.240 --> 45:59.240] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [46:22.240 --> 46:52.160] Okay, we are back. [46:52.160 --> 46:57.880] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Ted in California. [46:57.880 --> 47:03.720] Okay, Ted, you were giving us non-legal advice. [47:03.720 --> 47:04.720] You can't give legal advice. [47:04.720 --> 47:07.720] You were giving us your legal opinion. [47:07.720 --> 47:08.720] Correct. [47:08.720 --> 47:15.480] So, I'm going to just cut it short and call in tomorrow night. [47:15.480 --> 47:21.160] I want to talk more about the grand jury and the process there. [47:21.160 --> 47:24.040] And so, Randy, we're going to give Brett a little slack here. [47:24.040 --> 47:28.600] We're not going to tell him to pick his phone up and beat himself around the head with it. [47:28.600 --> 47:35.600] And hopefully, in the future, he'll know to put his oxygen mask on first. [47:35.600 --> 47:37.800] And I'll call in. [47:37.800 --> 47:40.400] I'll try to call in tomorrow night. [47:40.400 --> 47:41.400] Okay. [47:41.400 --> 47:42.400] All right. [47:42.400 --> 47:43.400] Thanks, Ted. [47:43.400 --> 47:44.400] Okay. [47:44.400 --> 47:53.360] Now, it looks like Chris dropped off. [47:53.360 --> 47:54.360] Maybe he'll call back in. [47:54.360 --> 47:57.280] Now, we're going to Tina in California. [47:57.280 --> 47:59.360] Hello, Ms. Tina. [47:59.360 --> 48:01.800] What do you have for us today? [48:01.800 --> 48:06.000] Well, a couple of little things here. [48:06.000 --> 48:13.560] I've been researching and reading my voluminous loan file. [48:13.560 --> 48:22.480] I find today that back in 2015, it says, please consider this a rush request. [48:22.480 --> 48:26.960] We have a court date on Monday and would like to have confirmation of the location of the [48:26.960 --> 48:36.000] note, verifying physical location of the note for litigation counsel, and redirect any questions [48:36.000 --> 48:37.000] to Calvin. [48:37.000 --> 48:44.240] Then it comes back saying, from life of loan, all correspondence needs to go through counsel. [48:44.240 --> 48:50.800] Initial review, the file, including the original note and mortgage, is at Deutsche Bank. [48:50.800 --> 48:53.040] The file has not been withdrawn. [48:53.040 --> 49:00.520] Well, why is my OneWest supposed loan at Deutsche Bank? [49:00.520 --> 49:10.240] Unless they are the mysterious investor that OneWest Bank claims does not participate in [49:10.240 --> 49:16.800] the loss share agreement, while at the same time they claim that OneWest Bank is the investor. [49:16.800 --> 49:27.080] So I'm wondering how do you use it and why it's saying this? [49:27.080 --> 49:28.080] Any thoughts? [49:28.080 --> 49:30.720] Is she breaking up on your end, Brett? [49:30.720 --> 49:32.360] She's breaking up on mine. [49:32.360 --> 49:33.920] A little bit. [49:33.920 --> 49:43.440] But overall, so they're asking for the location, but then you're saying, what is it about OneWest? [49:43.440 --> 49:53.880] Well, they were asking for the location of the note and mortgage because there was litigation [49:53.880 --> 49:54.880] going on. [49:54.880 --> 49:55.880] And they said- [49:55.880 --> 49:56.880] Wait a minute. [49:56.880 --> 49:57.880] Wait a minute. [49:57.880 --> 49:58.880] Who's they? [49:58.880 --> 49:59.880] Who's they? [49:59.880 --> 50:00.880] OneWest Bank. [50:00.880 --> 50:07.360] It's in the notes on my loan file. [50:07.360 --> 50:14.600] So OneWest was asking you to tell the location of some physical paper note? [50:14.600 --> 50:15.600] No. [50:15.600 --> 50:17.400] No, they weren't asking me. [50:17.400 --> 50:20.720] This was in the notes on my loan file. [50:20.720 --> 50:27.600] So they were asking, I guess, OneWest or counsel or whoever, because it doesn't say- [50:27.600 --> 50:28.600] Ah. [50:28.600 --> 50:29.600] It's just a list of notes. [50:29.600 --> 50:33.400] And they were saying, where is the original note and mortgage? [50:33.400 --> 50:36.600] It comes back because they had a litigation pending from me. [50:36.600 --> 50:40.960] So then it comes back saying, well, it's with Deutsche Bank. [50:40.960 --> 50:43.560] Why is it with Deutsche Bank? [50:43.560 --> 50:48.400] OneWest says they're the investor, but then they say the investor will lose everything [50:48.400 --> 50:52.520] because they don't participate in the loss share, but OneWest did. [50:52.520 --> 50:58.320] So this is the first I've heard of the involvement of Deutsche Bank. [50:58.320 --> 51:05.200] I'm not sure how I'm going to use it yet, but it's just interesting going through this [51:05.200 --> 51:10.440] and finding all these little snippets, because there's another note in there that said, [51:10.440 --> 51:11.800] why are we asking these questions? [51:11.800 --> 51:14.280] This loan closed two years ago. [51:14.280 --> 51:16.600] Wait a minute. [51:16.600 --> 51:17.600] Which loan closed three years ago? [51:17.600 --> 51:18.600] Because mine didn't. [51:18.600 --> 51:26.480] But it's in my notes with my loan number saying it closed two years ago. [51:26.480 --> 51:29.680] What does closed mean? [51:29.680 --> 51:31.960] I would like to know myself. [51:31.960 --> 51:32.960] It doesn't say. [51:32.960 --> 51:35.840] It says this loan closed two years ago. [51:35.840 --> 51:40.400] Well, it didn't close because it was taken out in 2008. [51:40.400 --> 51:44.480] And we're talking about this in 2011. [51:44.480 --> 51:50.440] They may be talking about an internal bank transaction closing, where they transfer it [51:50.440 --> 51:54.240] from one holder to another. [51:54.240 --> 51:58.480] It could be, but the dates don't add up to even that. [51:58.480 --> 51:59.480] That's what puzzles me. [51:59.480 --> 52:05.560] Because I looked at that and thinking, well, it's when the FDIC shut down First Fed and [52:05.560 --> 52:12.240] transferred it to them, or when OneWest transferred it from First Fed to IndyMax six months after [52:12.240 --> 52:17.000] it went out of business, none of it makes any sense, date-wise. [52:17.000 --> 52:18.680] So I'm just going through that. [52:18.680 --> 52:25.160] It's just interesting when you get this, how you've got to go through another puzzle. [52:25.160 --> 52:27.280] And of course, they denied me discovery. [52:27.280 --> 52:33.160] So I can't ask these questions as yet unless they in my appeal, which this has got an interesting [52:33.160 --> 52:34.160] point here. [52:34.160 --> 52:41.000] This is the case against the attorney, and it's related to him lying to me about sending [52:41.000 --> 52:46.320] the original note, which of course, if it was with Douche Bank, maybe they couldn't [52:46.320 --> 52:47.320] send it. [52:47.320 --> 52:55.360] So on an appeal, they filed their answer, but they did not do the proper disclosure [52:55.360 --> 52:58.320] of all their insurance and related parties. [52:58.320 --> 53:01.560] They only did one. [53:01.560 --> 53:10.920] So I filed, with the help of someone, filed an opposition to that saying, hey, they haven't [53:10.920 --> 53:15.200] done the correct disclosure under this rule, this rule, this rule, and we're demanding [53:15.200 --> 53:17.880] that they do the correct disclosure. [53:17.880 --> 53:25.360] And my 60-day extension that I asked for will run from the day they actually do the disclosure. [53:25.360 --> 53:28.160] Well, they had 15 days to oppose that. [53:28.160 --> 53:29.160] They didn't. [53:29.160 --> 53:39.480] So I just recently filed a notice of non-opposition stating, you know, hey, this was in my order. [53:39.480 --> 53:40.480] They did not respond. [53:40.480 --> 53:43.080] They still have not responded. [53:43.080 --> 53:50.000] And so therefore, we're expecting that the court orders them to fully disclose, as per [53:50.000 --> 53:56.120] the rules, and also that my time runs from the time that they disclose. [53:56.120 --> 54:02.120] But as yet, I've had nothing from the court and nothing from the opposing counsel. [54:02.120 --> 54:06.840] So I'm not sure what to think on that. [54:06.840 --> 54:12.840] Because it was unopposed, is what I asked for automatically granted, or does the court [54:12.840 --> 54:14.840] have to agree to it? [54:14.840 --> 54:19.000] The court would have to agree to it. [54:19.000 --> 54:26.200] But if the court's not ruling, you could petition for writ mandamus asking the higher court [54:26.200 --> 54:30.320] to order the lower court to render a ruling. [54:30.320 --> 54:32.280] How long has it been? [54:32.280 --> 54:33.280] Okay. [54:33.280 --> 54:43.440] I filed the notice of non-opposition, well, I filed the objection to their disclosure [54:43.440 --> 54:45.560] on May 5th. [54:45.560 --> 54:49.520] They had till May 20th to respond, and they didn't. [54:49.520 --> 54:54.640] And I filed a notice of non-opposition on the 26th, because I was on the train. [54:54.640 --> 54:58.520] I didn't have Wi-Fi access or ability to do it. [54:58.520 --> 54:59.520] And so- [54:59.520 --> 55:03.480] That was the 26th of May? [55:03.480 --> 55:04.480] Yes. [55:04.480 --> 55:07.320] Well, that's only a few days. [55:07.320 --> 55:12.240] The courts can sometimes take 30 or 60 days to respond. [55:12.240 --> 55:22.800] So, but then if they take that long, when does my response time start? [55:22.800 --> 55:30.520] Because technically I have until June the 23rd is what we agreed upon as an extension [55:30.520 --> 55:39.080] of time to file my reply to theirs, but now they didn't respond properly, am I still required [55:39.080 --> 55:44.880] to file by the 23rd, or is my time extended? [55:44.880 --> 55:47.880] That's a good question. [55:47.880 --> 55:53.520] And the other side could be using up your time, especially if they have their courts [55:53.520 --> 55:56.920] bought and paid for, and this is California. [55:56.920 --> 56:01.520] Yes, this is California, you're right. [56:01.520 --> 56:05.480] So I'm just kind of wondering, how do I address this? [56:05.480 --> 56:10.400] Do I have the court clerk, what I'm supposed to do? [56:10.400 --> 56:17.720] Do I try to have everything done by the 23rd, even though I do not have the full disclosure [56:17.720 --> 56:21.400] from the other side as they're required by law? [56:21.400 --> 56:29.880] You might file a motion for extension based on the failure of opposing party to provide [56:29.880 --> 56:31.840] the necessary discovery. [56:31.840 --> 56:36.880] Well, it's not discovery, it's disclosure. [56:36.880 --> 56:46.200] Disclosure, that's a part of discovery, disclosures are in discovery, but anyway, they're not [56:46.200 --> 56:48.960] providing their disclosures. [56:48.960 --> 56:52.920] And so they're using up your time and ask the court to charge that time to them and [56:52.920 --> 56:59.360] grant you the time you need to respond based on their failure to get your discovery to [56:59.360 --> 57:00.360] you. [57:00.360 --> 57:06.280] If the judge doesn't want this pushed out, she's not going to be happy, but she'll [57:06.280 --> 57:08.800] be unhappy at them, not at you. [57:08.800 --> 57:11.760] Yeah, that sounds like a good angle. [57:11.760 --> 57:19.840] Yeah, that's worth thinking about for sure, because they only disclose, they said there [57:19.840 --> 57:21.440] is no other party to disclose. [57:21.440 --> 57:26.680] Well, of course there is, it's their insurance part that they have to disclose. [57:26.680 --> 57:33.760] The bank was bought out by another bank last year, so they're required to disclose their [57:33.760 --> 57:37.680] new ownership, and they haven't disclosed any of that. [57:37.680 --> 57:43.160] I just found out it was pulled out by researching on the internet. [57:43.160 --> 57:49.200] So they're a party that's of interest in this case. [57:49.200 --> 57:50.200] Would that be correct? [57:50.200 --> 57:57.640] I would think if they bought it, if there's a claim, they bought the claim. [57:57.640 --> 57:58.640] Yeah. [57:58.640 --> 57:59.640] Okay, hang on. [57:59.640 --> 58:00.640] You couldn't bet? [58:00.640 --> 58:01.640] Oh, we got about 45 seconds. [58:01.640 --> 58:02.640] Oh, well. [58:02.640 --> 58:17.200] Anyway, but a motion to the court for an extension of time calculated based on the amount of [58:17.200 --> 58:22.800] time the other side has used by not providing the necessary disclosure, and blaming it on [58:22.800 --> 58:23.800] them. [58:23.800 --> 58:24.800] I like that. [58:24.800 --> 58:33.040] You get the judge P.O. with them so she don't hit P.O. with you. [58:33.040 --> 58:34.040] Okay. [58:34.040 --> 58:37.120] We have some empty space on the board. [58:37.120 --> 58:43.040] If you have a question or comment, give us a call, or call in number 512-646-1984. [58:43.040 --> 58:50.000] We'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:53.760] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. [58:53.760 --> 58:58.200] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.200 --> 59:03.600] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [59:03.600 --> 59:06.840] the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.840 --> 59:08.720] Enter the recovery version. [59:08.720 --> 59:14.560] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more [59:14.560 --> 59:18.280] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.280 --> 59:23.280] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance [59:23.280 --> 59:28.000] into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.160] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.160 --> 59:43.600] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102, [59:43.600 --> 59:47.640] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.640 --> 59:48.640] That's freestudybible.com. [59:48.640 --> 01:00:01.520] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:01.520 --> 01:00:05.280] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:05.280 --> 01:00:08.960] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:08.960 --> 01:00:10.440] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:10.440 --> 01:00:14.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:17.080] one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:17.080 --> 01:00:19.040] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:19.040 --> 01:00:22.640] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.640 --> 01:00:27.440] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.440 --> 01:00:32.520] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.520 --> 01:00:35.200] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.200 --> 01:00:39.480] This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search [01:00:39.480 --> 01:00:43.040] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:44.920] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:44.920 --> 01:00:49.800] Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. [01:00:49.800 --> 01:00:54.520] Think of how the number six is implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666. [01:00:54.520 --> 01:00:58.680] So it would fit right in that the Seventh Amendment would be about civil trials. [01:00:58.680 --> 01:01:01.120] Civil seven, civil trials, get it? [01:01:01.120 --> 01:01:05.280] Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, like [01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:07.080] the dividing line between properties. [01:01:07.080 --> 01:01:11.920] They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs. [01:01:11.920 --> 01:01:16.000] The Seventh Amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil [01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:19.400] matters instead of having a lone judge rule on the case. [01:01:19.400 --> 01:01:21.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:01:21.160 --> 01:01:31.960] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.960 --> 01:01:35.720] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.720 --> 01:01:39.400] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:40.880] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.880 --> 01:01:44.760] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:01:44.760 --> 01:01:47.880] one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:49.480] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.480 --> 01:01:53.080] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:53.080 --> 01:01:57.840] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:01:57.840 --> 01:02:03.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:05.600] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.600 --> 01:02:09.880] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [01:02:09.880 --> 01:02:13.400] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:13.400 --> 01:02:15.400] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:15.400 --> 01:02:21.280] Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel, 1984, when Winston is threatened with his [01:02:21.280 --> 01:02:22.400] worst fear? [01:02:22.400 --> 01:02:26.080] That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face. [01:02:26.080 --> 01:02:30.240] But what if his worst fear was spiders, eight-legged spiders, to be exact? [01:02:30.240 --> 01:02:33.900] Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual. [01:02:33.900 --> 01:02:37.600] That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment. [01:02:37.600 --> 01:02:41.940] Our Founding Fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from [01:02:41.940 --> 01:02:46.560] creepy-crawly eight-legged punishments and other cruel and unusual prison practices that [01:02:46.560 --> 01:02:48.160] were common in their day. [01:02:48.160 --> 01:02:52.480] The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging [01:02:52.480 --> 01:02:53.480] excessive fines. [01:02:53.480 --> 01:02:55.520] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:02:55.520 --> 01:03:20.520] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:26.220 --> 01:03:27.220] How are we, sir? [01:03:27.220 --> 01:03:29.380] Chant for our words to speak. [01:03:29.380 --> 01:03:30.740] Mother, me tell them. [01:03:30.740 --> 01:03:32.480] Chant down, father. [01:03:32.480 --> 01:03:34.020] Chant down, father. [01:03:34.020 --> 01:03:35.980] Chant for justice and. [01:03:35.980 --> 01:03:37.780] Chant for justice. [01:03:37.780 --> 01:03:39.460] Chant of rubies. [01:03:39.460 --> 01:03:41.180] Chant for our words to speak. [01:03:41.180 --> 01:03:43.040] Chant for our words to speak. [01:03:43.040 --> 01:03:45.380] Chant for our words to speak. [01:03:45.380 --> 01:03:48.140] None of them will me chant when me see. [01:03:48.140 --> 01:03:51.840] See all man was created equally. [01:03:51.840 --> 01:03:55.220] Chant down Babylon and do it daily. [01:03:55.220 --> 01:03:58.660] And when night come, pray for everybody. [01:03:58.660 --> 01:04:02.160] Say one by one me haff to chant them on. [01:04:02.160 --> 01:04:03.320] Me chant down Babylon. [01:04:03.320 --> 01:04:05.760] Chant for our words to speak. [01:04:05.760 --> 01:04:06.760] Okay, we are back. [01:04:06.760 --> 01:04:07.760] Dr. Dr. Albrecht Fountain, Moving Law Radio. [01:04:07.760 --> 01:04:10.020] And I'm talking to my team in California. [01:04:10.020 --> 01:04:17.260] Okay, Tina, Brett and I, we're talking about how we're having a little difficulty with [01:04:17.260 --> 01:04:18.260] you. [01:04:18.260 --> 01:04:21.620] We're having a little difficulty keeping up. [01:04:21.620 --> 01:04:30.300] And I explained to him what I think it is, is you talk to us, and you've talked to us [01:04:30.300 --> 01:04:34.220] a lot, and you know that we know what you're talking about. [01:04:34.220 --> 01:04:40.340] Well, we kind of do, but we don't have it in our mind the way you do. [01:04:40.340 --> 01:04:46.140] And you go through this real quickly, and I find myself struggling to try to remember [01:04:46.140 --> 01:04:50.260] how all these pieces fit together. [01:04:50.260 --> 01:04:56.100] You need to give us a little more background as you move through the different things that [01:04:56.100 --> 01:05:02.420] are going on, so it's easier for us that we need some road markers to keep us in place. [01:05:02.420 --> 01:05:05.220] Does that make sense, Tina? [01:05:05.220 --> 01:05:06.220] That makes sense. [01:05:06.220 --> 01:05:11.860] Just as a little quick background on what I was just talking about, this is the case, [01:05:11.860 --> 01:05:17.140] you know, I filed a case against the attorney for deliberately lying about sending me the [01:05:17.140 --> 01:05:23.860] original note in mortgage, and you had me file a declaratory judgment on whether I'm [01:05:23.860 --> 01:05:28.060] entitled to it, and the court said, oh, it's all bought by Resjit Akhada, and no, you're [01:05:28.060 --> 01:05:29.060] not entitled. [01:05:29.060 --> 01:05:35.620] So then I filed a fraud claim against him for deliberately defrauding me. [01:05:35.620 --> 01:05:41.580] It fitted all the elements, and the same trial court said, no, it's all bought by Resjit [01:05:41.580 --> 01:05:45.980] Akhada, even though it's a different party, a different claim. [01:05:45.980 --> 01:05:50.580] It's just regarding the same property, but, you know, it's completely different than [01:05:50.580 --> 01:05:59.700] this all happened afterwards, where they filed the anti-SLAPP and the litigation privilege. [01:05:59.700 --> 01:06:06.740] So I've taken it up to the appeal court, and we're going to go from there and see what [01:06:06.740 --> 01:06:12.580] they say, but this is the same appellate court that said, if you continue to litigate, we [01:06:12.580 --> 01:06:15.460] will sanction you. [01:06:15.460 --> 01:06:22.060] And the opposing attorneys remembered that, and in their response, they put, as the judge [01:06:22.060 --> 01:06:28.380] says, we're not asking for sanctions for ourself, but we ask that you give sanctions [01:06:28.380 --> 01:06:30.660] to her, to some charity, really? [01:06:30.660 --> 01:06:36.860] Well, you can't sanction a right to go to court and have a redress of grievance, isn't [01:06:36.860 --> 01:06:38.860] that correct? [01:06:38.860 --> 01:06:39.860] Exactly. [01:06:39.860 --> 01:06:42.460] Sanction the exercise of a right? [01:06:42.460 --> 01:06:43.460] Yeah. [01:06:43.460 --> 01:06:52.780] So even though they threatened me with that, and they were very bullying and berating me [01:06:52.780 --> 01:06:59.740] by putting, basta, enough, and it's got to stop, well, no, that's bullying language [01:06:59.740 --> 01:07:00.740] to me. [01:07:00.740 --> 01:07:02.860] You know, that's trying to berate and be a little illitigant. [01:07:02.860 --> 01:07:07.100] Well, you're not allowed to do that because you don't have a First Amendment right to [01:07:07.100 --> 01:07:09.060] do that as a judge. [01:07:09.060 --> 01:07:14.500] And then the other side continued with that in their response, and as the judge said, [01:07:14.500 --> 01:07:15.500] basta. [01:07:15.500 --> 01:07:19.540] Well, I mean, I am working on some complaints for that, but so that's where I'm at right [01:07:19.540 --> 01:07:20.540] now. [01:07:20.540 --> 01:07:25.220] And as I said, they did not file the correct disclosures. [01:07:25.220 --> 01:07:33.940] They did not respond to my notice of objection to their response and lack of proper disclosure. [01:07:33.940 --> 01:07:38.180] And so then I filed a notice of non-response. [01:07:38.180 --> 01:07:42.820] So that's where I'm at, is just going after that attorney for the bank for deliberately [01:07:42.820 --> 01:07:46.820] lying and then saying, oh, we have litigation privilege to do whatever we want. [01:07:46.820 --> 01:07:49.460] No, you don't. [01:07:49.460 --> 01:07:51.620] It was just before the break. [01:07:51.620 --> 01:07:53.900] It dawned on me what you were talking about. [01:07:53.900 --> 01:07:59.020] I was thinking about the other suits against one West and all the rest of them, then it [01:07:59.020 --> 01:08:01.820] dawned on me, you sued this lawyer. [01:08:01.820 --> 01:08:10.860] He said, that's good, you sued the lawyer for lying, and I bet he is unhappy. [01:08:10.860 --> 01:08:18.540] Well, I'm sure he is, but remember you read their response and you were the one that pointed [01:08:18.540 --> 01:08:25.780] out to me, as soon as you read it, you said, wait a minute, here they are admitting to [01:08:25.780 --> 01:08:32.140] their guilt right out in the response because they said that, I think the wording was you [01:08:32.140 --> 01:08:38.740] knew when those statements were made, that we had no intention of following through. [01:08:38.740 --> 01:08:42.540] And you said that's a complete admission of guilt. [01:08:42.540 --> 01:08:45.780] Like I am psychic and I knew what you were thinking. [01:08:45.780 --> 01:08:46.780] No. [01:08:46.780 --> 01:08:51.380] But they said it right there, they admitted it. [01:08:51.380 --> 01:08:55.220] That was mind reading, but they weren't reading your mind. [01:08:55.220 --> 01:08:59.500] They were reading, accusing you of reading their mind. [01:08:59.500 --> 01:09:00.500] Yeah. [01:09:00.500 --> 01:09:06.980] And, you know, I mean, they're just going around the bush saying, oh, we have the absolute [01:09:06.980 --> 01:09:07.980] litigation privilege. [01:09:07.980 --> 01:09:11.740] We have this, we have that, we have a first, oh, that's the other thing they claim. [01:09:11.740 --> 01:09:18.620] They have a first amendment right to free speech. [01:09:18.620 --> 01:09:23.780] And free speech goes to free speech. [01:09:23.780 --> 01:09:32.660] Yeah, that whole free speech thing goes along with a responsibility or how do they call [01:09:32.660 --> 01:09:39.500] it a responsibility for the effects thereof. [01:09:39.500 --> 01:09:43.260] You don't have freedom of speech in court. [01:09:43.260 --> 01:09:46.580] You have freedom of speech out on the street. [01:09:46.580 --> 01:09:53.540] But when you walk into a courtroom environment, you don't have freedom of speech. [01:09:53.540 --> 01:09:58.980] You only speak when the judge tells you you can speak and you speak to what the judge [01:09:58.980 --> 01:10:00.900] tells you, you can speak to it. [01:10:00.900 --> 01:10:03.060] You don't have it in there. [01:10:03.060 --> 01:10:11.780] Well, they also have a duty under their business and professional rules of conduct to not mislead [01:10:11.780 --> 01:10:16.500] the other party, to not lie to the court, so does any other party. [01:10:16.500 --> 01:10:21.940] So there's all these rules of professional misconduct that they have violated. [01:10:21.940 --> 01:10:26.140] And then I pointed out to the lower court, they said, oh no, it's all about by res judicata [01:10:26.140 --> 01:10:29.140] because they can't think of anything else to argue. [01:10:29.140 --> 01:10:32.340] That's the only thing they ever come back with. [01:10:32.340 --> 01:10:36.220] They never had a good argument in the first place. [01:10:36.220 --> 01:10:38.260] No. [01:10:38.260 --> 01:10:44.900] My wife got a little placard and put on the refrigerator for me once years ago, not long [01:10:44.900 --> 01:10:52.860] after we got married, and it said if you can't, oh, how does it go, if you can't convince [01:10:52.860 --> 01:10:58.820] them with facts, baffle them with BS, something to that effect. [01:10:58.820 --> 01:11:04.860] That sounds like the attorneys, yeah. [01:11:04.860 --> 01:11:07.620] It sounds like exactly what they're doing. [01:11:07.620 --> 01:11:14.660] But now you, these are much different circumstances because now you've sued the attorney directly [01:11:14.660 --> 01:11:22.380] for what he's doing, that you were trying to get the judge to address in the foreclosure [01:11:22.380 --> 01:11:28.080] context, but he wouldn't, the judge wouldn't go to this. [01:11:28.080 --> 01:11:32.460] Now you have filed a suit that goes directly to this. [01:11:32.460 --> 01:11:35.700] So it would be a lot harder for them to duck and dodge. [01:11:35.700 --> 01:11:43.060] Except for the appeal court, judges are already against me. [01:11:43.060 --> 01:11:53.060] Free speech, that is an interesting argument they're bringing. [01:11:53.060 --> 01:11:57.020] They're saying that free speech goes to aggravated perjury. [01:11:57.020 --> 01:11:58.020] Yes. [01:11:58.020 --> 01:12:00.500] Well, they're free to speak. [01:12:00.500 --> 01:12:06.740] Nobody's saying that they are not allowed to open their mouth or something. [01:12:06.740 --> 01:12:08.420] But they also have responsibility. [01:12:08.420 --> 01:12:13.260] They have consequences for what they decide that they're going to speak. [01:12:13.260 --> 01:12:17.500] Yeah, they're yelling fire in a courtroom. [01:12:17.500 --> 01:12:21.220] Yeah, there are consequences. [01:12:21.220 --> 01:12:25.900] Doesn't mean that they didn't have a freedom to speak, but that means they're the ones [01:12:25.900 --> 01:12:28.900] that are liable for those consequences. [01:12:28.900 --> 01:12:30.380] Yes. [01:12:30.380 --> 01:12:33.300] Perjury, not okay. [01:12:33.300 --> 01:12:35.020] Absolutely promised it. [01:12:35.020 --> 01:12:41.420] Now, well, the other thing I bring it up, brought up, and the trial court judge ignored [01:12:41.420 --> 01:12:47.940] it as usual, is that, you know, he says, well, you were not, the court says you're not entitled [01:12:47.940 --> 01:12:48.940] to it. [01:12:48.940 --> 01:12:53.580] Well, really these are lunges and the original note. [01:12:53.580 --> 01:12:54.580] Well, really? [01:12:54.580 --> 01:12:55.580] Irrelevant. [01:12:55.580 --> 01:13:00.580] So when the attorney said, it's relevant because when the attorney said he was going to send [01:13:00.580 --> 01:13:06.700] them, he can't plead ignorance of the law if he thought what my attorney sent him as [01:13:06.700 --> 01:13:08.900] the requirement was wrong. [01:13:08.900 --> 01:13:18.380] He had a duty to say, Oh, Mr. Anna, we actually disagree with your request and your interpretation [01:13:18.380 --> 01:13:19.380] of the law. [01:13:19.380 --> 01:13:22.220] And we don't believe your client is entitled to it. [01:13:22.220 --> 01:13:23.220] That's what they should have done. [01:13:23.220 --> 01:13:25.380] But no, they said, Oh yeah, we'll send it to you. [01:13:25.380 --> 01:13:28.720] So no, you can't plead ignorance of the law as an attorney. [01:13:28.720 --> 01:13:32.700] You should have known, and this is what you should have said if that's what you believed. [01:13:32.700 --> 01:13:33.700] So. [01:13:33.700 --> 01:13:35.700] I still say that's irrelevant. [01:13:35.700 --> 01:13:39.300] Whether or not you had access to it, it doesn't matter. [01:13:39.300 --> 01:13:45.500] If somebody had promised you, the attorney had promised you something else that you didn't [01:13:45.500 --> 01:13:47.140] really have a right to. [01:13:47.140 --> 01:13:52.460] He says, yeah, I'll promise I'll come and, you know, your car broke down a block away. [01:13:52.460 --> 01:13:53.460] No problem. [01:13:53.460 --> 01:13:54.460] I promise. [01:13:54.460 --> 01:13:58.060] After this court case, I'll go and help pick you up and do that. [01:13:58.060 --> 01:14:03.100] And then later when you expected him to do what he promised he would do, he says, Oh, [01:14:03.100 --> 01:14:04.100] you should have known. [01:14:04.100 --> 01:14:05.100] I was just kidding. [01:14:05.100 --> 01:14:06.940] I'm not going to help anybody. [01:14:06.940 --> 01:14:10.100] You have a right to rely on what somebody promises. [01:14:10.100 --> 01:14:13.020] And he did actually much worse than that. [01:14:13.020 --> 01:14:16.220] He put it on the record in a court case. [01:14:16.220 --> 01:14:21.060] And you relied on that and you were harmed in a court case by that. [01:14:21.060 --> 01:14:25.500] So yes, it's, I think, irrelevant. [01:14:25.500 --> 01:14:31.540] Yeah, it's irrelevant whether a court would have thought that you had a right to have [01:14:31.540 --> 01:14:34.540] that thing. [01:14:34.540 --> 01:14:38.300] That's not the point. [01:14:38.300 --> 01:14:40.300] His statement was proactive. [01:14:40.300 --> 01:14:45.300] He made a proactive statement that he didn't have to make. [01:14:45.300 --> 01:14:46.580] Yeah. [01:14:46.580 --> 01:14:51.500] If he had said to you, instead of what he did say, if he had said, I don't think I have [01:14:51.500 --> 01:14:54.220] to provide that to you. [01:14:54.220 --> 01:14:56.180] Let's see what the court thinks. [01:14:56.180 --> 01:15:00.260] And then you would have had a motion or an objection and the judge would have to adjudicate [01:15:00.260 --> 01:15:02.500] whether or not you have a right to that. [01:15:02.500 --> 01:15:04.500] Well then that's different. [01:15:04.500 --> 01:15:05.500] Correct. [01:15:05.500 --> 01:15:06.500] Correct. [01:15:06.500 --> 01:15:14.300] But he just went ahead out there and just spontaneously made you a promise. [01:15:14.300 --> 01:15:15.300] Yes. [01:15:15.300 --> 01:15:20.180] And not only once, but he made that promise twice in writing. [01:15:20.180 --> 01:15:28.020] And under California Evidence Code 623, a party cannot change their mind. [01:15:28.020 --> 01:15:33.540] Once they've said something, they can't change their mind in any other litigation. [01:15:33.540 --> 01:15:35.540] They can't contradict themselves. [01:15:35.540 --> 01:15:38.340] Well, he's now contradicting himself. [01:15:38.340 --> 01:15:45.460] And that goes directly to the concept of collateral estoppel. [01:15:45.460 --> 01:15:48.900] That's exactly what collateral estoppel is. [01:15:48.900 --> 01:15:50.300] Yes. [01:15:50.300 --> 01:15:57.380] But the judge, it's all about by restricting his conduct. [01:15:57.380 --> 01:16:06.380] Well, we'll see how it works in this case, because now this is the issue before the court. [01:16:06.380 --> 01:16:16.420] So the lawyer would probably be well advised to get his insurance carrier to make you a [01:16:16.420 --> 01:16:17.420] deal. [01:16:17.420 --> 01:16:24.140] Have you tried the Stowars Doctrine? [01:16:24.140 --> 01:16:25.140] Not yet. [01:16:25.140 --> 01:16:26.140] Okay. [01:16:26.140 --> 01:16:33.860] I've talked about it, I thought about it, but I haven't tried it. [01:16:33.860 --> 01:16:34.860] Okay. [01:16:34.860 --> 01:16:35.860] Do you have anything else on the other side? [01:16:35.860 --> 01:16:36.860] Information. [01:16:36.860 --> 01:16:37.860] No, no. [01:16:37.860 --> 01:16:38.860] I'll let you go to other corners. [01:16:38.860 --> 01:16:43.860] And thank you for your input on values and appreciate it. [01:16:43.860 --> 01:16:45.820] Thank you, Tina. [01:16:45.820 --> 01:16:54.580] This is Randy Kelt and Brett Fountain, we have Mike from Tennessee, John from New York. [01:16:54.580 --> 01:17:00.700] Pick him up on the other side, we'll be right back. [01:17:00.700 --> 01:17:05.100] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [01:17:05.100 --> 01:17:06.100] Word? [01:17:06.100 --> 01:17:11.220] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture [01:17:11.220 --> 01:17:17.620] Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.620 --> 01:17:22.140] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [01:17:22.140 --> 01:17:24.540] dividing the word of truth. [01:17:24.540 --> 01:17:28.520] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse [01:17:28.520 --> 01:17:31.820] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [01:17:31.820 --> 01:17:36.460] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [01:17:36.460 --> 01:17:38.860] and Christian character development. [01:17:38.860 --> 01:17:43.380] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.380 --> 01:17:47.700] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [01:17:47.700 --> 01:17:49.980] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:17:49.980 --> 01:17:56.620] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [01:17:56.620 --> 01:18:00.860] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:18:00.860 --> 01:18:05.460] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:18:05.460 --> 01:18:06.860] of nutrition. [01:18:06.860 --> 01:18:10.700] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all [01:18:10.700 --> 01:18:11.700] that. [01:18:11.700 --> 01:18:17.300] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:17.300 --> 01:18:23.620] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [01:18:23.620 --> 01:18:25.900] provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.900 --> 01:18:31.860] LogosRadioNetwork gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.860 --> 01:18:37.100] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [01:18:37.100 --> 01:18:40.300] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.300 --> 01:18:46.220] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:18:46.220 --> 01:18:47.860] quality radio. [01:18:47.860 --> 01:18:52.180] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.180 --> 01:18:57.420] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:18:57.420 --> 01:18:59.420] increase your income. [01:18:59.420 --> 01:19:02.860] This is the LogosRadioNetwork. [01:19:02.860 --> 01:19:05.540] This is the LogosRadioNetwork. [01:19:05.540 --> 01:19:35.020] This is the LogosRadioNetwork. [01:19:36.140 --> 01:19:41.140] I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan. [01:19:41.140 --> 01:19:46.340] You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand. [01:19:46.340 --> 01:19:54.940] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:54.940 --> 01:20:00.540] Hang on to me. [01:20:00.540 --> 01:20:09.020] Okay, we are back, Randy Carroll from Brent Mountain Radio on this Thursday, the first [01:20:09.020 --> 01:20:13.740] day of June, 2023. [01:20:13.740 --> 01:20:17.540] And we're going to Mike in Tennessee. [01:20:17.540 --> 01:20:18.540] Hello, Mike. [01:20:18.540 --> 01:20:23.060] Hey, how y'all doing out there? [01:20:23.060 --> 01:20:25.620] We're doing pretty good down here. [01:20:25.620 --> 01:20:28.340] What do y'all got for today? [01:20:28.340 --> 01:20:34.980] Well, I had a question for you there, Mr. Kelton. [01:20:34.980 --> 01:20:40.420] Last week, I was listening to the show, you had said something about ongoing criminal [01:20:40.420 --> 01:20:41.420] enterprise. [01:20:41.420 --> 01:20:44.140] Can you elaborate on that? [01:20:44.140 --> 01:20:48.420] Is there any federal case law on that? [01:20:48.420 --> 01:20:57.340] Racketeering-inspired criminal enterprise, criminal body enterprise. [01:20:57.340 --> 01:21:00.100] Criminal what, Brent? [01:21:00.100 --> 01:21:01.100] Organization. [01:21:01.100 --> 01:21:02.500] Yeah, organization. [01:21:02.500 --> 01:21:07.060] I think it's influence, racketeering-influenced, yeah. [01:21:07.060 --> 01:21:14.420] Yeah, racketeering-influenced criminal organization, RICO. [01:21:14.420 --> 01:21:16.140] RICO is a special kind of suit. [01:21:16.140 --> 01:21:25.140] It's a law that was put in to give the government a way to go after organized crime. [01:21:25.140 --> 01:21:27.700] Yeah, corrupt organizations. [01:21:27.700 --> 01:21:31.580] So there has to be at least two acts. [01:21:31.580 --> 01:21:37.380] I think they've got 35 different ones. [01:21:37.380 --> 01:21:44.540] Multiple predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal enterprise. [01:21:44.540 --> 01:21:51.220] Multiple predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal enterprise. [01:21:51.220 --> 01:21:56.500] Okay, is there a federal case law that I can cite? [01:21:56.500 --> 01:21:57.500] Big time. [01:21:57.500 --> 01:22:05.700] Well, you'd sue them using OJU U.S. Code 1983, but RICO, there is a RICO statute. [01:22:05.700 --> 01:22:08.460] Just look up R-I-C-O, RICO statute. [01:22:08.460 --> 01:22:13.380] Yeah, I think it's 1961. [01:22:13.380 --> 01:22:15.860] Let's see. [01:22:15.860 --> 01:22:22.580] In Texas, we've got Chapter 71, Texas Penal Code goes to Street Gang Statute of Organized [01:22:22.580 --> 01:22:23.580] Crime. [01:22:23.580 --> 01:22:33.780] Every state has one, and then we have the Fed that overreaches all of it. [01:22:33.780 --> 01:22:34.780] We have sued- [01:22:34.780 --> 01:22:43.460] The ongoing criminal enterprise, it's going to be in the municipal court, the probate [01:22:43.460 --> 01:22:53.060] court out there, with the ongoing criminal enterprise, because they have stolen my inherited [01:22:53.060 --> 01:22:58.380] property along with the closed union bar association shop. [01:22:58.380 --> 01:23:05.540] So these third-party leases just come in there and just gives them the job, and the probate [01:23:05.540 --> 01:23:13.740] court takes 30% of the sale of the state on top of that sale- [01:23:13.740 --> 01:23:14.740] Wait a minute. [01:23:14.740 --> 01:23:15.740] Wait a minute. [01:23:15.740 --> 01:23:16.740] Wait a minute. [01:23:16.740 --> 01:23:23.060] You have started in the middle of a big story. [01:23:23.060 --> 01:23:25.060] What the heck are you talking about? [01:23:25.060 --> 01:23:30.700] Yeah, he's launching into it. [01:23:30.700 --> 01:23:37.300] So you had, did you say you had your property, there was something inherited, but you never [01:23:37.300 --> 01:23:43.700] did get to see it because a bunch of lawyers swept in and they sold it and divvied it up? [01:23:43.700 --> 01:23:47.380] Well, they're a criminal organization. [01:23:47.380 --> 01:23:54.180] It's the probate court out there in California, which they have no sense of jurisdiction. [01:23:54.180 --> 01:24:02.260] The person who's blood-related is the superior rightful heir, not the state probate court [01:24:02.260 --> 01:24:05.660] or the third-party probate leases and lawyers. [01:24:05.660 --> 01:24:06.660] Wait a minute. [01:24:06.660 --> 01:24:13.860] You're still, you're starting in the middle of something, and you're making really far-reaching [01:24:13.860 --> 01:24:22.940] assertions with no structure behind it, so all we're hearing is a lot of vague accusations, [01:24:22.940 --> 01:24:27.140] and we have no idea what you're talking about. [01:24:27.140 --> 01:24:34.540] Here's the thing, Mike, when we, it's natural for us to do what you're doing right now, [01:24:34.540 --> 01:24:41.580] but what happens is you've got all these facts that are going on in your mind, and those [01:24:41.580 --> 01:24:48.460] facts would lead anybody, a reasonable person, to some kind of conclusion, and you're starting [01:24:48.460 --> 01:24:54.340] in here by telling us your conclusion, but we don't know the facts, so everybody would [01:24:54.340 --> 01:24:59.220] probably come to that same conclusion, oh, they're all criminals, and oh, it's a whole [01:24:59.220 --> 01:25:03.780] bunch of leeches, and we probably would come to that very same conclusion, but we don't [01:25:03.780 --> 01:25:07.300] know what the facts underneath it are that you're talking about. [01:25:07.300 --> 01:25:09.780] You know, like, was there a sale? [01:25:09.780 --> 01:25:12.040] Your property was sold? [01:25:12.040 --> 01:25:15.380] Somebody decided that they owned your property more than you do, and they decided they wanted [01:25:15.380 --> 01:25:18.440] to sell it and take all the proceeds, and you know what I mean? [01:25:18.440 --> 01:25:22.460] We don't know those facts, you do, and it's real easy for your mind to just go ahead and [01:25:22.460 --> 01:25:26.860] jump to the conclusion part and tell us the conclusion, but we don't know what's underneath [01:25:26.860 --> 01:25:27.860] it yet. [01:25:27.860 --> 01:25:37.620] Yeah, that's basically what the organized crime criminal closed union shops did. [01:25:37.620 --> 01:25:38.620] They steal people's properties. [01:25:38.620 --> 01:25:46.420] I mean, this is not just in the state of California, but it's all across the, in most states. [01:25:46.420 --> 01:25:52.300] They give the illusion to the republic that they have the authority and it belongs in [01:25:52.300 --> 01:25:55.260] probate court, and that's not true. [01:25:55.260 --> 01:26:01.340] They have no subject matter jurisdiction, just because a loved one or one of your relatives [01:26:01.340 --> 01:26:06.540] didn't leave a trust or will, therefore they say, well, the state has to come in and cause [01:26:06.540 --> 01:26:09.500] controversy and give you up the property. [01:26:09.500 --> 01:26:15.140] Well, that's not conserving the state to the proper heirs. [01:26:15.140 --> 01:26:19.420] Probate court's all about sales, and that's exactly what they did over my objection. [01:26:19.420 --> 01:26:23.120] But like I said, this can't be said in one phone call. [01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:32.900] My call was to see Mr. Kelton, I know I emailed you quite a few documents on that two weeks [01:26:32.900 --> 01:26:40.780] ago, and I never heard from Ted Scarlett, so I guess he don't want to talk, but trying [01:26:40.780 --> 01:26:47.020] to close any shop attorney out there, it's kind of hard because they're all part of the [01:26:47.020 --> 01:26:49.260] same racket. [01:26:49.260 --> 01:26:57.360] It will be really hard to get any attorney if you just throw them a whole stack of documents. [01:26:57.360 --> 01:27:02.340] People send me stacks of documents all the time and I take a stack of documents. [01:27:02.340 --> 01:27:04.980] What am I going to do with that? [01:27:04.980 --> 01:27:06.620] I can start reading these documents. [01:27:06.620 --> 01:27:08.420] You know what they all go to. [01:27:08.420 --> 01:27:14.140] The thing I always want to see is a timeline. [01:27:14.140 --> 01:27:18.260] What happened and when, this happened and this happened and this happened. [01:27:18.260 --> 01:27:22.420] Now I can look at these documents and I can see where they go and kind of get an idea [01:27:22.420 --> 01:27:24.500] what's going on. [01:27:24.500 --> 01:27:31.380] But also after the timeline, the documents need some kind of a synopsis of what they [01:27:31.380 --> 01:27:33.940] are. [01:27:33.940 --> 01:27:41.740] I don't have time to take a whole stack of somebody's documents and read them from scratch. [01:27:41.740 --> 01:27:46.820] I'd spend all my time reading people's documents, so I don't even, when I just get a stack of [01:27:46.820 --> 01:27:52.260] documents, I don't even waste my time to try to figure out what all that stuff is unless [01:27:52.260 --> 01:27:55.220] you give me some kind of organizing principle. [01:27:55.220 --> 01:28:01.660] Well, that was the timeline I sent you. [01:28:01.660 --> 01:28:03.740] No, no. [01:28:03.740 --> 01:28:04.740] That was the timeline. [01:28:04.740 --> 01:28:09.020] I think, no, if you had a timeline, you would, I think it's a timeline. [01:28:09.020 --> 01:28:12.220] You would absolutely be certain because they're hard to write. [01:28:12.220 --> 01:28:18.660] It's a lot of work to write a timeline, but you need one. [01:28:18.660 --> 01:28:23.100] If you're going to be able to talk about these issues, you need a timeline. [01:28:23.100 --> 01:28:28.180] You needed to come on here and say, I had a relative in California. [01:28:28.180 --> 01:28:37.340] He or he passed away, he or he had assets, but didn't have a will, give us kind of the [01:28:37.340 --> 01:28:39.020] structure of what's going on here. [01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:43.020] You just come in here and said, oh, they're all a bunch of crooks. [01:28:43.020 --> 01:28:48.340] Okay, that may be, but that's not helpful. [01:28:48.340 --> 01:28:51.820] We don't know how to help you because we just don't have enough information. [01:28:51.820 --> 01:28:57.860] Well, I mean, it's the same thing with y'all's friends out there, what you're doing. [01:28:57.860 --> 01:29:02.620] It's the same criminality organization that you're up against. [01:29:02.620 --> 01:29:07.460] We're all on the fighting for the rights. [01:29:07.460 --> 01:29:08.460] Okay. [01:29:08.460 --> 01:29:09.460] Okay. [01:29:09.460 --> 01:29:17.540] When I talk about, say, Victoria County operating an ongoing criminal conspiracy, or even better [01:29:17.540 --> 01:29:24.660] Travis County, I claimed specifically what they were doing. [01:29:24.660 --> 01:29:30.420] They arrest someone instead of taking them directly to the nearest magistrate the way [01:29:30.420 --> 01:29:33.860] Article 1406 and 1516 commands them to do it. [01:29:33.860 --> 01:29:38.420] I'm just saying you're going up the same against the criminal organization. [01:29:38.420 --> 01:29:39.420] Yeah. [01:29:39.420 --> 01:29:40.420] Okay. [01:29:40.420 --> 01:29:43.420] So I don't know what you're asking us then. [01:29:43.420 --> 01:29:51.740] If I'm to understand what you're talking about, I need some structure. [01:29:51.740 --> 01:30:02.980] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [01:30:02.980 --> 01:30:08.500] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps [01:30:08.500 --> 01:30:09.500] on growing. [01:30:09.500 --> 01:30:12.580] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:30:12.580 --> 01:30:16.740] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:30:16.740 --> 01:30:18.460] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.460 --> 01:30:22.060] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.060 --> 01:30:27.060] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.060 --> 01:30:32.300] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.300 --> 01:30:34.820] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.820 --> 01:30:40.460] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:30:40.460 --> 01:30:42.180] Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.180 --> 01:30:44.380] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:44.380 --> 01:30:48.540] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? [01:30:48.540 --> 01:30:52.140] If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart. [01:30:52.140 --> 01:30:55.900] But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:30:55.900 --> 01:31:00.900] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually [01:31:00.900 --> 01:31:04.460] makes it harder for people to manage problems. [01:31:04.460 --> 01:31:08.420] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter [01:31:08.420 --> 01:31:10.740] in their prefrontal cortex. [01:31:10.740 --> 01:31:15.860] That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. [01:31:15.860 --> 01:31:18.140] So take a deep breath and chill out. [01:31:18.140 --> 01:31:21.260] It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack. [01:31:21.260 --> 01:31:31.180] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.180 --> 01:31:36.540] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:36.540 --> 01:31:39.020] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:39.020 --> 01:31:43.580] 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.580 --> 01:31:46.300] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.300 --> 01:31:49.020] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.020 --> 01:31:50.500] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.500 --> 01:31:51.500] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.500 --> 01:31:52.860] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.860 --> 01:31:53.860] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.860 --> 01:31:55.540] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.540 --> 01:31:58.140] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.140 --> 01:32:02.740] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:02.740 --> 01:32:05.620] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:05.620 --> 01:32:09.380] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going [01:32:09.380 --> 01:32:13.340] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.340 --> 01:32:16.540] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [01:32:16.540 --> 01:32:20.580] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.580 --> 01:32:24.420] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [01:32:24.420 --> 01:32:25.820] our rights through due process. [01:32:25.820 --> 01:32:29.420] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put [01:32:29.420 --> 01:32:32.940] together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what [01:32:32.940 --> 01:32:35.900] due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [01:32:35.900 --> 01:32:39.900] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:32:39.900 --> 01:32:41.260] ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.260 --> 01:32:44.460] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [01:32:44.460 --> 01:32:49.020] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [01:32:49.020 --> 01:32:51.340] documents and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.340 --> 01:32:55.300] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.300 --> 01:33:00.860] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:00.860 --> 01:33:07.140] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:34:00.860 --> 01:34:17.660] We're talking to Mike in Tennessee. [01:34:17.660 --> 01:34:23.140] Baby Mike, when you came on, I misunderstood what you were here for. [01:34:23.140 --> 01:34:31.260] Did you come here to ask us for something, some input or something, in particular? [01:34:31.260 --> 01:34:42.580] Well, I mean, I just explained it in simple, and it's the truth, and I think the public [01:34:42.580 --> 01:34:49.380] needs to know, and most people are aware of it, even watching Mr. Craig. [01:34:49.380 --> 01:34:50.380] Yeah. [01:34:50.380 --> 01:34:56.700] I think everybody is aware that there are two primary courts that are very corrupt, [01:34:56.700 --> 01:34:59.380] and that's family courts and probate. [01:34:59.380 --> 01:35:01.820] Oh, big time, big time. [01:35:01.820 --> 01:35:08.780] I mean, not just the probate courts, but most of the courts are very much arbitrary, and [01:35:08.780 --> 01:35:10.580] they're corrupt to the bone. [01:35:10.580 --> 01:35:20.220] But like I said, you're dealing with an ongoing criminal organization, and I think [01:35:20.220 --> 01:35:28.340] this country has been taken over by the Bar Association for the last 80 or 90 years. [01:35:28.340 --> 01:35:37.220] They've been oppressing the public so much, and it's like what you're going through, [01:35:37.220 --> 01:35:39.980] what Mr. O'Kellen is going through. [01:35:39.980 --> 01:35:44.740] He said he filed a complaint, as we listened earlier, he said the defendants didn't answer. [01:35:44.740 --> 01:35:48.700] I think a motion through default should have been filed, maybe he already did or didn't. [01:35:48.700 --> 01:35:50.660] I'm not sure. [01:35:50.660 --> 01:35:56.460] But filing a motion through default when they had 21 days to answer, that should have been [01:35:56.460 --> 01:35:57.460] done. [01:35:57.460 --> 01:36:06.060] But like I said, when you're pro se, it's hard for the person to be respected by licensed [01:36:06.060 --> 01:36:11.300] bar attorneys because they really despise people in sweet jurists and pro se as their [01:36:11.300 --> 01:36:12.300] own man. [01:36:12.300 --> 01:36:14.780] So they really despise you. [01:36:14.780 --> 01:36:22.100] And I think most people in the public should realize, like I was listening to Ms. Tina, [01:36:22.100 --> 01:36:25.780] she may have to go to United States District Court to get some justice, same thing with [01:36:25.780 --> 01:36:26.780] me in my case. [01:36:26.780 --> 01:36:31.820] I may have to go to United States District Court, because at the lower court levels, [01:36:31.820 --> 01:36:38.060] I don't think you'll get any justice, and I'll let somebody else get on. [01:36:38.060 --> 01:36:46.100] Okay, I get that, especially if you're pro se. [01:36:46.100 --> 01:36:53.020] And I've sat in court and watched judges deal with pro ses and do everything they can to [01:36:53.020 --> 01:36:55.660] help them. [01:36:55.660 --> 01:36:59.580] But the pro ses just wouldn't let the judge. [01:36:59.580 --> 01:37:05.540] It was one case, this woman, Bonnie, just got five years in prison. [01:37:05.540 --> 01:37:12.060] I was encouraged to come to one of her hearings, and she was in the Republic of Texas group [01:37:12.060 --> 01:37:16.340] who preached this patriot mythology stuff. [01:37:16.340 --> 01:37:21.580] And they were railing about this judge, about a family court judge, about how horrible she [01:37:21.580 --> 01:37:23.820] was and on and on and on. [01:37:23.820 --> 01:37:26.260] And I went and sat in this hearing. [01:37:26.260 --> 01:37:35.940] It was a sanctioned hearing or a contempt of court hearing, and this judge was doing everything [01:37:35.940 --> 01:37:46.180] she could to get Bonnie to give her one reason not to file for contempt of court with her [01:37:46.180 --> 01:37:47.760] against her. [01:37:47.760 --> 01:37:52.220] And she just would not let her. [01:37:52.220 --> 01:37:55.900] Halfway through, I couldn't listen anymore, got up and walked out. [01:37:55.900 --> 01:37:59.540] The judge gave her 30 days. [01:37:59.540 --> 01:38:07.180] I thought, you know, if I was that judge, I'd probably gave her 10 years. [01:38:07.180 --> 01:38:16.100] She was struggling to tell her, please, just tell me this, oh, I'm not the person you're [01:38:16.100 --> 01:38:17.100] addressing. [01:38:17.100 --> 01:38:23.700] I'm not the all-caps and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, on and on. [01:38:23.700 --> 01:38:27.260] She wanted her 30 days in jail. [01:38:27.260 --> 01:38:30.660] And the judge was absolutely frustrated. [01:38:30.660 --> 01:38:33.620] It's not all the judges. [01:38:33.620 --> 01:38:37.140] You get a pro se, come into your court. [01:38:37.140 --> 01:38:40.740] I sat in a mock trial once in Massachusetts. [01:38:40.740 --> 01:38:43.620] I was the judge in a mock trial. [01:38:43.620 --> 01:38:49.220] This guy had sent some liens to some public officials in Pennsylvania, and they were prosecuting [01:38:49.220 --> 01:38:50.220] him in Pennsylvania. [01:38:50.220 --> 01:38:55.540] But he lived in Massachusetts, so we had a mock trial. [01:38:55.540 --> 01:39:01.500] And him and this guy who's helping him got up there, and they were just blasting out [01:39:01.500 --> 01:39:04.060] this patriot mythology stuff. [01:39:04.060 --> 01:39:10.100] Well, I was sitting as the judge, and I was surprised at how different it was. [01:39:10.100 --> 01:39:18.100] As the judge, it was my job to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence, [01:39:18.100 --> 01:39:23.220] and apply the law as it came to me to the facts in the case. [01:39:23.220 --> 01:39:29.020] That's my job, but not giving me any facts in the case. [01:39:29.020 --> 01:39:33.740] You're giving me political ideology. [01:39:33.740 --> 01:39:37.980] And even if I agreed with him, it wouldn't help. [01:39:37.980 --> 01:39:40.740] You have to give me facts in law. [01:39:40.740 --> 01:39:44.340] If you don't, I can't rule in your favor. [01:39:44.340 --> 01:39:53.700] People go into family courts, and they are at their absolute worst. [01:39:53.700 --> 01:39:56.860] And they tell the judge how horrible the wife was. [01:39:56.860 --> 01:40:01.900] The wife tells the judge how horrible the husband is. [01:40:01.900 --> 01:40:06.580] No matter what the judge does, somebody's not gonna be happy. [01:40:06.580 --> 01:40:11.180] And if the judge does her job right, neither side will be happy. [01:40:11.180 --> 01:40:12.720] Probate. [01:40:12.720 --> 01:40:14.540] People don't know anything about probate. [01:40:14.540 --> 01:40:17.820] They don't understand how it works. [01:40:17.820 --> 01:40:22.780] And lawyers absolutely take advantage of that, because there's a lot of money involved. [01:40:22.780 --> 01:40:25.820] So yeah, I absolutely agree, they're corrupt. [01:40:25.820 --> 01:40:30.420] But if we're gonna do anything about it, we're gonna do our homework. [01:40:30.420 --> 01:40:35.100] Rhett, did I chase him off? [01:40:35.100 --> 01:40:37.340] I think he got off right at the beginning. [01:40:37.340 --> 01:40:39.580] I hope he was hearing some of that. [01:40:39.580 --> 01:40:42.740] Okay, I didn't mean to run him off. [01:40:42.740 --> 01:40:48.380] But yeah, I agree with him, the courts are a mess, especially in California. [01:40:48.380 --> 01:40:49.580] You mentioned it's two courts. [01:40:49.580 --> 01:40:53.300] I was thinking that you were gonna mention two other courts. [01:40:53.300 --> 01:41:02.180] It's the courts you know about, and then the courts you don't. [01:41:02.180 --> 01:41:03.180] I'm not sure. [01:41:03.180 --> 01:41:06.740] Two that I think, you said there are two that are corrupt. [01:41:06.740 --> 01:41:08.540] It's family and probate. [01:41:08.540 --> 01:41:11.660] And I was thinking you were gonna say it's the courts you've been in, and the courts [01:41:11.660 --> 01:41:12.660] you haven't. [01:41:12.660 --> 01:41:17.740] No, that might have been a good idea. [01:41:17.740 --> 01:41:26.220] But those two, I get more complaining and more really negative feedback on those two [01:41:26.220 --> 01:41:28.820] courts more than any other. [01:41:28.820 --> 01:41:32.900] People complain about tax, and they complain about criminal. [01:41:32.900 --> 01:41:39.500] Well, there's something that's just gut wrenching at a visceral level, people getting [01:41:39.500 --> 01:41:44.540] their entire families torn apart or getting their entire life savings in their homes and [01:41:44.540 --> 01:41:46.340] everything ripped away from them. [01:41:46.340 --> 01:41:51.340] There's something that's just deep and visceral about that. [01:41:51.340 --> 01:41:55.660] And almost always nobody's gonna be happy. [01:41:55.660 --> 01:42:00.740] And the more they fight with one another, the more the lawyers take. [01:42:00.740 --> 01:42:04.900] And the lawyers do everything they can to set them against one another. [01:42:04.900 --> 01:42:07.900] Exactly. [01:42:07.900 --> 01:42:15.060] We just have to learn what we're doing, get better at what we're doing. [01:42:15.060 --> 01:42:21.620] So I know I didn't answer his question, didn't give him what he wanted, but oh well. [01:42:21.620 --> 01:42:25.940] Well, and I see Ted came back on here. [01:42:25.940 --> 01:42:28.460] Yeah, I saw him hide. [01:42:28.460 --> 01:42:30.900] I saw him hide down there at the bottom. [01:42:30.900 --> 01:42:36.100] So we got John in New York, we've got what's left of this segment. [01:42:36.100 --> 01:42:40.660] We could give John a minute and a half, couldn't we? [01:42:40.660 --> 01:42:41.660] John? [01:42:41.660 --> 01:42:42.660] Yup? [01:42:42.660 --> 01:42:46.580] You got a minute and 15 seconds. [01:42:46.580 --> 01:42:47.580] Let us have it. [01:42:47.580 --> 01:42:48.580] Well, okay. [01:42:48.580 --> 01:42:49.980] Would you do me a favor? [01:42:49.980 --> 01:42:50.980] And I need your help. [01:42:50.980 --> 01:42:52.980] I need it right away. [01:42:52.980 --> 01:42:58.740] You're not gonna talk about a seatbelt issue, are you? [01:42:58.740 --> 01:42:59.740] A what? [01:42:59.740 --> 01:43:02.740] No, no seatbelt tickets. [01:43:02.740 --> 01:43:03.740] Okay. [01:43:03.740 --> 01:43:06.780] Yeah, I was just picking on you. [01:43:06.780 --> 01:43:11.180] I was just filling some time, we were a minute before the break and we didn't have time [01:43:11.180 --> 01:43:17.100] to get into anything, so I figured it'd be a good opportunity to pick on you a little [01:43:17.100 --> 01:43:18.100] bit. [01:43:18.100 --> 01:43:19.100] Okay. [01:43:19.100 --> 01:43:20.100] That's all right. [01:43:20.100 --> 01:43:21.100] You can pick on me. [01:43:21.100 --> 01:43:22.100] I appreciate it. [01:43:22.100 --> 01:43:30.500] Anyway, this is about code enforcement offices and I just want to reiterate, make sure I [01:43:30.500 --> 01:43:34.980] understand and that's basically it. [01:43:34.980 --> 01:43:35.980] Okay. [01:43:35.980 --> 01:43:36.980] Okay. [01:43:36.980 --> 01:43:37.980] Hang on. [01:43:37.980 --> 01:43:38.980] Yeah. [01:43:38.980 --> 01:43:45.500] I just got the grass police ruling, Jerry sent it to me in snail mail, so I finally [01:43:45.500 --> 01:43:46.500] got it. [01:43:46.500 --> 01:43:48.500] I've got somebody that's been wanting it. [01:43:48.500 --> 01:43:49.500] Okay. [01:43:49.500 --> 01:43:50.500] Hang on. [01:43:50.500 --> 01:43:59.780] I just got a call in numbers, we've got one segment, two people, we'll be right back. [01:43:59.780 --> 01:44:04.420] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [01:44:04.420 --> 01:44:08.580] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [01:44:08.580 --> 01:44:12.900] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [01:44:12.900 --> 01:44:13.900] can win too. [01:44:13.900 --> 01:44:18.700] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:44:18.700 --> 01:44:20.380] civil rights statutes. [01:44:20.380 --> 01:44:25.340] What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone [01:44:25.340 --> 01:44:29.980] calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables [01:44:29.980 --> 01:44:33.300] on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:44:33.300 --> 01:44:38.420] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:44:38.420 --> 01:44:40.580] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:44:40.580 --> 01:44:46.100] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [01:44:46.100 --> 01:44:49.100] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:44:49.100 --> 01:44:58.140] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [01:44:58.140 --> 01:45:00.780] collectors now. [01:45:00.780 --> 01:45:03.980] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:03.980 --> 01:45:09.220] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand [01:45:09.220 --> 01:45:14.020] four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:14.020 --> 01:45:18.940] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:18.940 --> 01:45:22.740] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:22.740 --> 01:45:27.580] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:27.580 --> 01:45:34.140] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.140 --> 01:45:38.820] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:38.820 --> 01:45:43.180] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.180 --> 01:45:49.340] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.340 --> 01:46:17.340] pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [01:46:17.340 --> 01:46:24.340] to subscribe. [01:46:24.340 --> 01:46:38.020] Okay. [01:46:38.020 --> 01:46:39.020] We are back. [01:46:39.020 --> 01:46:40.020] We're in the fountain. [01:46:40.020 --> 01:46:43.780] We're at Rule Law Radio and we're talking to John in New York. [01:46:43.780 --> 01:46:45.980] Okay, John. [01:46:45.980 --> 01:46:46.980] What is it? [01:46:46.980 --> 01:46:50.260] What do you need to know about ordinances? [01:46:50.260 --> 01:46:51.660] Okay. [01:46:51.660 --> 01:46:53.940] You mentioned that you heard from someone. [01:46:53.940 --> 01:46:55.540] Tell me about that. [01:46:55.540 --> 01:46:57.300] Oh, Jerry. [01:46:57.300 --> 01:47:00.500] Jerry took on the grass police in Pennsylvania. [01:47:00.500 --> 01:47:07.540] The grass police come onto his property and photographed his weeds, and he had no trespassing [01:47:07.540 --> 01:47:08.540] signs up. [01:47:08.540 --> 01:47:13.580] And he caught them on his property and told them to get the heck off his property, and [01:47:13.580 --> 01:47:15.700] they gave him a hard time. [01:47:15.700 --> 01:47:20.420] And then they filed charges against him based on the photographs they took while they were [01:47:20.420 --> 01:47:23.420] on his property. [01:47:23.420 --> 01:47:33.580] And he sued him in the federal court for a criminal trespass and won. [01:47:33.580 --> 01:47:41.620] The feds told him, you went on his property, passed his no trespassing signs without a [01:47:41.620 --> 01:47:45.620] warrant. [01:47:45.620 --> 01:47:50.260] So they reversed the ruling in the case and remanded it back. [01:47:50.260 --> 01:47:55.260] I bet the next time they go traipsing around and somebody says, get off my property, they're [01:47:55.260 --> 01:47:59.020] not going to try to convince the homeowner how important they are. [01:47:59.020 --> 01:48:02.780] Yeah, probably not. [01:48:02.780 --> 01:48:07.680] That is one of my favorite cases. [01:48:07.680 --> 01:48:14.740] That's even better than a traffic ticket taken to the feds. [01:48:14.740 --> 01:48:15.740] The grass police. [01:48:15.740 --> 01:48:19.820] Well, Brett, did you get my message I just sent you? [01:48:19.820 --> 01:48:21.820] My message? [01:48:21.820 --> 01:48:24.540] Oh, what way did you send it? [01:48:24.540 --> 01:48:28.940] I know I haven't been looking at any messages anywhere right now. [01:48:28.940 --> 01:48:32.500] Yeah, I sent it about five minutes ago. [01:48:32.500 --> 01:48:33.500] Okay. [01:48:33.500 --> 01:48:34.500] Anyways. [01:48:34.500 --> 01:48:36.020] I'll go take a look at messages. [01:48:36.020 --> 01:48:38.220] All right, here it is. [01:48:38.220 --> 01:48:40.700] Essentially, I don't want to say too much on the air. [01:48:40.700 --> 01:48:45.340] I just want to know what I looked at. [01:48:45.340 --> 01:48:50.660] You guys told me exactly where to look and I looked, I could not find the information [01:48:50.660 --> 01:48:59.460] that you told me to find on whether or not New York state who has authorized why as far [01:48:59.460 --> 01:49:05.140] as the code enforcement rules and regulations. [01:49:05.140 --> 01:49:12.220] And I could first place first place to look at the constitution, who does the constitution [01:49:12.220 --> 01:49:14.300] empower to make law? [01:49:14.300 --> 01:49:22.500] Well, it's the legislature, the state legislature and well, we talked to someone in Ohio, and [01:49:22.500 --> 01:49:34.420] it was actually in the constitution that says, you know, say that again, so in Ohio, it was [01:49:34.420 --> 01:49:40.140] in their constitution that cities, cities could write ordinances. [01:49:40.140 --> 01:49:48.060] Now, yeah, so they could write ordinances, they could write law. [01:49:48.060 --> 01:49:55.260] But in Texas, there is no authorization for a municipality to write law. [01:49:55.260 --> 01:50:00.900] So the legislature authorized them to create ordinances. [01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:12.260] And our argument was that if the ordinance is applied to anyone other than a employee [01:50:12.260 --> 01:50:18.300] of the corporation, or someone in contractual privity with the corporation, where they had [01:50:18.300 --> 01:50:25.140] agreed to the court to the statutory scheme, that they have tried to apply it to anybody [01:50:25.140 --> 01:50:31.500] else, it would have the effect of a law, and would therefore be an unconstitutional application [01:50:31.500 --> 01:50:32.500] of the ordinance. [01:50:32.500 --> 01:50:33.500] Right. [01:50:33.500 --> 01:50:34.500] Exactly. [01:50:34.500 --> 01:50:37.180] So that's the argument we're trying to bring. [01:50:37.180 --> 01:50:42.420] But the constitution first, and then look in the legislature. [01:50:42.420 --> 01:50:53.580] If the constitution did not give municipalities and counties authority to write law, and if [01:50:53.580 --> 01:51:00.260] the legislature gave them the authority to write ordinances, then our argument is the [01:51:00.260 --> 01:51:08.060] ordinance cannot be applied to the public in general, because only the legislature can [01:51:08.060 --> 01:51:11.100] write laws that apply to the public in general. [01:51:11.100 --> 01:51:13.620] Yeah, binding on the public. [01:51:13.620 --> 01:51:17.060] Does that make sense, John? [01:51:17.060 --> 01:51:18.700] Oh, yeah, yeah. [01:51:18.700 --> 01:51:24.140] Now, so how will that affect what I'm asking you help for? [01:51:24.140 --> 01:51:32.220] Will that mean that the code office can't do anything, they can't authorize, they have [01:51:32.220 --> 01:51:34.020] no authority to enforce? [01:51:34.020 --> 01:51:35.740] That's what I'm trying to say. [01:51:35.740 --> 01:51:40.460] They have no authority to enforce against you. [01:51:40.460 --> 01:51:47.060] Now, if you're a licensed professional and you've got your license from the municipality, [01:51:47.060 --> 01:51:50.260] that's a different thing. [01:51:50.260 --> 01:51:57.560] And if the application for the license, if in the application you agreed to abide by [01:51:57.560 --> 01:52:01.900] all city ordinances, then they can enforce against you. [01:52:01.900 --> 01:52:02.900] Yeah. [01:52:02.900 --> 01:52:03.900] Right. [01:52:03.900 --> 01:52:04.900] That's different. [01:52:04.900 --> 01:52:05.900] Obviously, that's not the case. [01:52:05.900 --> 01:52:10.300] So am I correct in saying, and here's the magic question, and this will answer my whole [01:52:10.300 --> 01:52:13.620] question, my whole problem. [01:52:13.620 --> 01:52:22.700] If I were to say that the code enforcement office has no authority to enforce the code [01:52:22.700 --> 01:52:32.860] regulations, let's see if I can remember some of the other names, rules, regulations, [01:52:32.860 --> 01:52:39.900] code, statutes, they just do, all the municipalities do are ordinances. [01:52:39.900 --> 01:52:40.900] Ordinances. [01:52:40.900 --> 01:52:46.940] Well, sometimes they call it code, but it's not, it can't be binding on the public unless [01:52:46.940 --> 01:52:48.620] the constitution allowed that. [01:52:48.620 --> 01:52:53.340] So you have to look and find it in the state to see if it's allowed or not. [01:52:53.340 --> 01:52:56.340] And so just look in the state constitution. [01:52:56.340 --> 01:53:01.860] And then look in the statutes that came from the legislators, because we, the people that [01:53:01.860 --> 01:53:06.020] are in New York, put some representatives in there to set up how the laws are going [01:53:06.020 --> 01:53:08.420] to be in the state of New York. [01:53:08.420 --> 01:53:13.580] And if they set it up that way, like almost none of them did, but which was the one that [01:53:13.580 --> 01:53:15.220] you found, Randy, that had? [01:53:15.220 --> 01:53:16.220] Ohio. [01:53:16.220 --> 01:53:17.220] Ohio. [01:53:17.220 --> 01:53:22.340] So if New York is like Ohio, then you're stuck with that. [01:53:22.340 --> 01:53:25.380] You need to go to your legislators and tell them to fix it. [01:53:25.380 --> 01:53:31.180] But if it's like most of the states, then these guys that are writing ordinances have [01:53:31.180 --> 01:53:34.140] no business trying to apply them to you. [01:53:34.140 --> 01:53:35.140] Right. [01:53:35.140 --> 01:53:36.140] All right. [01:53:36.140 --> 01:53:43.300] And, and, and what's the, and this whole thing is whether or not the legislature or [01:53:43.300 --> 01:53:45.300] the state constitution. [01:53:45.300 --> 01:53:49.540] Okay, hold on, John, hold on. [01:53:49.540 --> 01:53:50.540] Yeah. [01:53:50.540 --> 01:53:55.740] It hinges on what the constitution allows, not what the legislature allows. [01:53:55.740 --> 01:54:04.340] What we're saying is if the constitution only authorized the legislature to write law [01:54:04.340 --> 01:54:12.020] and did not authorize the legislature to delegate its authority to write law, then it can't [01:54:12.020 --> 01:54:14.700] delegate that authority. [01:54:14.700 --> 01:54:15.700] Right. [01:54:15.700 --> 01:54:22.900] In Texas, only the legislature can write law binding on the people. [01:54:22.900 --> 01:54:25.900] Period. [01:54:25.900 --> 01:54:32.020] They allowed, they authorized municipalities and counties to issue ordinances, but they [01:54:32.020 --> 01:54:40.700] could not bind those on the people because then it would have the effect of a law and [01:54:40.700 --> 01:54:45.380] writing law is not a power the legislature can delegate. [01:54:45.380 --> 01:54:47.380] Right. [01:54:47.380 --> 01:54:52.900] And so even in New York, they cannot delegate that, is that correct? [01:54:52.900 --> 01:54:54.320] I don't know. [01:54:54.320 --> 01:54:56.620] What does the New York constitution say? [01:54:56.620 --> 01:54:57.620] Right. [01:54:57.620 --> 01:54:58.620] You gotta find it. [01:54:58.620 --> 01:55:03.300] Okay, it hinges on what the constitution in New York allows. [01:55:03.300 --> 01:55:07.260] That's the whole, the whole crux. [01:55:07.260 --> 01:55:08.260] Yes. [01:55:08.260 --> 01:55:09.260] Okay. [01:55:09.260 --> 01:55:17.700] And when you can, when you can, when you can, Brett, take a look at your text messages. [01:55:17.700 --> 01:55:19.100] I explained a few things in there. [01:55:19.100 --> 01:55:23.500] I didn't want to go into it on the air, but I explained a couple of things there. [01:55:23.500 --> 01:55:24.500] Okay. [01:55:24.500 --> 01:55:29.900] Read your text messages and see what you can do to answer and cause I know you guys are [01:55:29.900 --> 01:55:30.900] busy. [01:55:30.900 --> 01:55:31.900] Okay. [01:55:31.900 --> 01:55:34.900] Thank you, John. [01:55:34.900 --> 01:55:37.180] We've got one more caller. [01:55:37.180 --> 01:55:40.300] We got Ted's back from California. [01:55:40.300 --> 01:55:42.700] Hello, Ted. [01:55:42.700 --> 01:55:45.100] What do you have for us now? [01:55:45.100 --> 01:55:51.180] Well, this goes to Mike in Tennessee, but it does go to everyone. [01:55:51.180 --> 01:56:00.100] And you know, Randy, from time to time, we don't appreciate or forget how it all started [01:56:00.100 --> 01:56:05.580] and for us and each is, you know, a personal story. [01:56:05.580 --> 01:56:11.860] But what I got out of Mike, number one, Mike seems like a very intelligent guy. [01:56:11.860 --> 01:56:17.820] He seems to know a little bit of law, know a little bit of procedure, but number one [01:56:17.820 --> 01:56:22.580] thing, Randy, cause you've got a tough shell, you got a turtle shell. [01:56:22.580 --> 01:56:25.380] Mike is traumatized right now. [01:56:25.380 --> 01:56:26.380] Okay. [01:56:26.380 --> 01:56:30.420] And he's trying to get back up on his feet. [01:56:30.420 --> 01:56:37.260] And so he's doing exactly the kind of thing I did from time to time calling in and everybody [01:56:37.260 --> 01:56:43.460] needs to know that yes, this suck. [01:56:43.460 --> 01:56:45.060] Okay. [01:56:45.060 --> 01:56:47.420] And you've got two choices. [01:56:47.420 --> 01:56:57.120] Buck it up and move along or hunker down and learn law procedure and the court. [01:56:57.120 --> 01:57:05.540] And if you want to shine the light of the corruption in the probate court, then one [01:57:05.540 --> 01:57:08.420] step at a time. [01:57:08.420 --> 01:57:14.740] I also think people come on and they think they can have one conversation on this show [01:57:14.740 --> 01:57:17.780] and get their problems fixed. [01:57:17.780 --> 01:57:19.980] That's not how it works. [01:57:19.980 --> 01:57:23.580] It's going to be a thousand paper cut. [01:57:23.580 --> 01:57:26.220] Everything is paper. [01:57:26.220 --> 01:57:28.780] Everything you get into the court. [01:57:28.780 --> 01:57:33.700] So I feel for Mike and I don't know, I don't know if he reached out to me. [01:57:33.700 --> 01:57:40.620] I certainly didn't see it or I would have responded, but just keep in mind, Randy, because [01:57:40.620 --> 01:57:47.820] you're past all that and you, you tossed out a few bitter pills tonight and if, if people [01:57:47.820 --> 01:57:53.340] have to take them with a shot of tequila, I recommend they do because reality is reality. [01:57:53.340 --> 01:57:58.820] And the only way we're going to change this is one pleading filing at a time. [01:57:58.820 --> 01:58:04.700] And remember at the civil or the first level, all you're doing is creating a record for [01:58:04.700 --> 01:58:05.700] appeal. [01:58:05.700 --> 01:58:16.300] Okay, if I came off sounding like I was trying to give Mike a hard time, it wasn't my intention. [01:58:16.300 --> 01:58:19.700] I was expecting that he had some issue. [01:58:19.700 --> 01:58:25.620] It sounded like he was just calling and was complaining and I was trying to get to something [01:58:25.620 --> 01:58:28.860] a little more focused than just complaining. [01:58:28.860 --> 01:58:33.500] Mike if you felt like I was heavy handed, it was not my intention. [01:58:33.500 --> 01:58:36.100] I'm not Eddie Craig. [01:58:36.100 --> 01:58:39.460] Okay, thank you all for listening. [01:58:39.460 --> 01:58:46.100] We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour eco-marathon and we'll be taking the calls [01:58:46.100 --> 01:58:47.100] all night. [01:58:47.100 --> 01:58:50.220] Thank you all for listening and good night. [01:58:50.220 --> 01:58:56.300] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.300 --> 01:58:57.500] recovery version. [01:58:57.500 --> 01:59:02.460] The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.460 --> 01:59:08.140] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.140 --> 01:59:11.420] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.420 --> 01:59:20.400] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.400 --> 01:59:25.920] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus [01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:29.940] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:29.940 --> 01:59:32.500] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.500 --> 01:59:40.860] To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.860 --> 01:59:59.220] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.