[00:00.000 --> 00:05.800] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.800 --> 00:09.480] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.480 --> 00:10.960] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.960 --> 00:14.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.880 --> 00:16.960] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.960 --> 00:18.560] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.560 --> 00:22.160] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.160 --> 00:26.920] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.920 --> 00:32.040] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.040 --> 00:34.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.560 --> 00:38.120] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com [00:38.120 --> 00:42.160] The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.160 --> 00:45.560] Start over with StartPage. [00:45.560 --> 00:47.640] SPAR, it's what fighters do. [00:47.640 --> 00:51.160] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.160 --> 00:54.200] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to SPAR with you. [00:54.200 --> 01:00.320] SPAR with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, [01:00.320 --> 01:02.880] A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:02.880 --> 01:06.520] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, [01:06.520 --> 01:08.440] press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.440 --> 01:10.760] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.760 --> 01:14.480] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.480 --> 01:17.440] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.440 --> 01:21.280] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.280 --> 01:25.840] I'm Dr. Katharine Albrecht, more news and information at KatharineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.680 --> 01:35.040] Pressure, we usually associate it with stress and negativity, [01:35.040 --> 01:37.600] but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing. [01:37.600 --> 01:41.280] I'm Dr. Katharine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea [01:41.280 --> 01:45.880] can be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure. [01:45.880 --> 01:47.880] Privacy is under attack. [01:47.880 --> 01:51.480] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.480 --> 01:56.280] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.280 --> 02:01.520] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.520 --> 02:04.040] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.040 --> 02:07.600] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:07.600 --> 02:11.560] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:11.560 --> 02:15.360] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.360 --> 02:19.160] Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure [02:19.160 --> 02:22.000] to cure everything from headaches to constipation. [02:22.000 --> 02:24.400] The pressure is applied to points known as meridians [02:24.400 --> 02:27.560] that are believed to control the flow of energy in the human body. [02:27.560 --> 02:30.120] Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea. [02:30.120 --> 02:34.440] You might try the next time you get a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness. [02:34.440 --> 02:37.760] Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6. [02:37.760 --> 02:42.200] You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, about two fingers width down from your palm. [02:42.200 --> 02:48.160] Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands. [02:48.160 --> 02:51.640] But this relief is free and always on hand. [02:51.640 --> 03:13.120] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:21.640 --> 03:30.640] All right, folks. Good evening. [03:30.640 --> 03:32.720] This is the Monday Night Rural Law Radio Show. [03:32.720 --> 03:36.080] Your host, Eddie Craig, it is March 6, 2023. [03:36.080 --> 03:38.440] We are live tonight. [03:38.440 --> 03:42.520] Now, the phones are on. [03:42.520 --> 03:48.360] If anybody wants to call and get in line, the phone number is 512-646-1984. [03:48.360 --> 03:51.840] If y'all want to call in and talk, y'all just get in line there. [03:51.840 --> 03:55.480] But before we start taking callers, there's something I kind of want to touch on that [03:55.480 --> 03:59.040] I'm putting into the new seminar material that I'm still working on. [03:59.040 --> 04:00.320] No, it's not ready. [04:00.320 --> 04:02.960] No, I can't tell you when it's going to be. [04:02.960 --> 04:09.440] I can only tell you I am trying to make it as thorough, in-depth, and bulletproof as [04:09.440 --> 04:13.600] absolutely possible, okay? [04:13.600 --> 04:18.680] I hope to make you as much of an expert on this issue as I have had to become, just like [04:18.680 --> 04:23.000] Dave Champion did on the federal income tax issues when he wrote Income Tax Shattering [04:23.000 --> 04:24.480] the Myths. [04:24.480 --> 04:31.080] My goal here is to make sure that we leave no stone unturned so that we can never again [04:31.080 --> 04:37.320] lose an argument with a public official, even in a court of law, if they are willing to [04:37.320 --> 04:42.400] both apply and abide by the law, okay? [04:42.400 --> 04:48.520] So that said, what I want to get into for our short discussion tonight is the insufficient [04:48.520 --> 04:50.800] evidence problem in criminal traffic courts. [04:50.800 --> 04:55.760] And it doesn't really matter what state you're in, though I am going to speak specifically [04:55.760 --> 05:03.040] about how it's done in Texas, it essentially works exactly the same way in every state. [05:03.040 --> 05:08.000] Having had to fight traffic tickets in multiple states during my military career when I'd [05:08.000 --> 05:12.360] get a speeding ticket here and there when I was in the Air Force and so on and so forth [05:12.360 --> 05:19.680] I've appeared in courts in multiple states and believe me, they all do the same thing. [05:19.680 --> 05:27.360] They ignore the rules to get your money and that's all that matters to them, okay? [05:27.360 --> 05:34.040] Now here in Texas, the rules of criminal procedure are in their own code. [05:34.040 --> 05:37.520] That code is the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [05:37.520 --> 05:44.000] We also have the Texas Rules of Evidence, which while not a code per se, contains the [05:44.000 --> 05:49.160] rules that are published by the Texas Supreme Court on everything to do with admissible [05:49.160 --> 05:52.560] evidence in our courts of law, okay? [05:52.560 --> 05:57.240] The Texas Rules of Evidence are not promulgated by the Texas legislature. [05:57.240 --> 06:03.680] They are promulgated by the Texas Supreme Court and only the Texas Supreme Court. [06:03.680 --> 06:08.880] The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, even though it's the criminal Supreme Court, does not [06:08.880 --> 06:11.600] promulgate these rules. [06:11.600 --> 06:19.120] They are bound by them as written by the Texas Supreme Court, okay? [06:19.120 --> 06:23.920] As are these lower courts that are also failing to abide by them. [06:23.920 --> 06:28.360] Now the rules of criminal procedure and the rules of evidence work hand in hand from the [06:28.360 --> 06:36.080] moment you are suspected of criminal conduct until the moment you are found not guilty. [06:36.080 --> 06:41.640] Notice that I did not say that this relationship stops once you have been convicted of an [06:41.640 --> 06:47.120] offense and that's because the relationship does not stop if you are in the process of [06:47.120 --> 06:52.960] appealing your case or you were railroaded or wrongfully convicted and you are trying [06:52.960 --> 06:57.000] to fight it, especially on evidentiary issues. [06:57.000 --> 07:00.120] That relationship doesn't stop. [07:00.120 --> 07:07.840] Although this particular subject is going to be extensive, it's imperative that you [07:07.840 --> 07:12.520] understand how this works, okay? [07:12.520 --> 07:17.680] So what exactly am I saying the evidence problem is, okay? [07:17.680 --> 07:22.480] Well the explanation for that starts in the United States and Texas Constitution's respective [07:22.480 --> 07:29.760] Bill of Rights and it culminates in the codification of one specific right into legislatively enacted [07:29.760 --> 07:31.840] black letter law. [07:31.840 --> 07:38.560] Here in Texas, that law is Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.03 which codifies the [07:38.560 --> 07:44.640] presumption of innocence clause of both Constitution's Bill of Rights. [07:44.640 --> 07:50.920] Now for full context, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.03 reads as follows. [07:50.920 --> 08:03.400] Well 38.03 presumption of innocence and then it reads, all persons are presumed to be innocent [08:03.400 --> 08:11.000] and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved [08:11.000 --> 08:14.320] beyond a reasonable doubt. [08:14.320 --> 08:21.040] Each element folks, all right continue on the statute, the fact that he has been arrested, [08:21.040 --> 08:29.560] confined or indicted for or otherwise charged with the offense gives rise to no inference [08:29.560 --> 08:31.640] of guilt at his trial. [08:31.640 --> 08:37.000] Now this in these traffic courts creates more than a presumption of innocence problem and [08:37.000 --> 08:43.400] more than an evidentiary problem because here in Texas we also have the examining trial [08:43.400 --> 08:52.080] that they refuse to do but that examining trial is where the presumption of innocence [08:52.080 --> 09:01.880] comes to its first acid test and that is through a probable cause determination by a judge. [09:01.880 --> 09:07.720] It's not one made by the arresting officer, not by the person who signs the complaint [09:07.720 --> 09:16.880] but by an actual judge who is not attached to the case but they don't do the probable [09:16.880 --> 09:23.480] cause finding so what they do is they send you directly to trial as if the presumption [09:23.480 --> 09:28.160] of innocence does not apply. [09:28.160 --> 09:35.080] You now must go to court and defend your innocence against what they have turned into a presumption [09:35.080 --> 09:39.480] of guilt by failing to even have a probable cause hearing. [09:39.480 --> 09:45.400] The presumption is probable cause must exist, you must be guilty or we would not be going [09:45.400 --> 09:49.800] into court to have a trial. [09:49.800 --> 09:57.080] That negates the presumption of innocence but even more egregious and provable than that [09:57.080 --> 10:06.200] perspective, is the fact that they are not asserting and proving all of the elements [10:06.200 --> 10:13.320] of the alleged defense and this statute specifically says that they must do that so what our Texas [10:13.320 --> 10:21.880] courts have done is find ways to avoid having to address what all of the required elements [10:21.880 --> 10:25.120] of an offense actually are. [10:25.120 --> 10:28.760] Now those of you that have listened to this show knows that there's something specific [10:28.760 --> 10:34.240] I'm talking about here and that once again boils down to the transportation issue. [10:34.240 --> 10:40.520] But we have to look at this from a constitutional protection and a constitutional requirement [10:40.520 --> 10:48.200] for how that protection is made to function in order to see why this is such an imperative [10:48.200 --> 10:53.960] argument to make and to stand on and force the court to deal with which so far they have [10:53.960 --> 11:00.480] refused to do and they have outright avoided it or they've mischaracterized it so they [11:00.480 --> 11:04.080] could treat it as if it didn't mean anything. [11:04.080 --> 11:12.320] But here's the problem, the courts especially the third quarter criminal appeals has said [11:12.320 --> 11:16.280] that the term transportation doesn't mean anything. [11:16.280 --> 11:21.960] Now if you've seen cases where the Texas Supreme Court has had to make judicial determinations [11:21.960 --> 11:26.360] about how incorrect the criminal courts have been in their interpretation of the law and [11:26.360 --> 11:31.120] the Texas Constitution, you will never have an opportunity to stop reading. [11:31.120 --> 11:35.520] There are that many cases, okay? [11:35.520 --> 11:43.160] The courts on the criminal side are so ignorant of the Constitution and the laws of the state [11:43.160 --> 11:50.240] of Texas that how these people even passed the fricking bar to practice in this state [11:50.240 --> 11:53.320] is beyond me. [11:53.320 --> 11:59.320] But what did again I digress, you would think that the bar exam actually required you to [11:59.320 --> 12:04.320] have an understanding of these things, it doesn't. [12:04.320 --> 12:15.600] The bar exam only requires you to have an understanding of how a high court decided that law and what [12:15.600 --> 12:19.160] they decided it actually means. [12:19.160 --> 12:26.880] And they don't bring up the fact of whether or not that opinion conflicted with the Constitution, [12:26.880 --> 12:32.360] conflicted with multiple other parts of the law, they don't address any of that. [12:32.360 --> 12:38.320] They just say what is the opinion, what is the citation for the opinion where the court [12:38.320 --> 12:41.440] determined this specific issue? [12:41.440 --> 12:47.840] Or in the case of blah, blah, blah, what is the specific issue that the court was attempting [12:47.840 --> 12:50.760] to determine and finally settled on? [12:50.760 --> 12:55.280] Those are the kinds of things that are on your bar exam. [12:55.280 --> 13:00.520] There's nothing about what does the law actually say in respect to this. [13:00.520 --> 13:07.440] No, they simply go by what some higher court said the law said and then they ignore whether [13:07.440 --> 13:13.880] that law has even changed since that opinion was originally rendered. [13:13.880 --> 13:18.480] For instance, did you know, as I stated in one of the shows I did with some of the other [13:18.480 --> 13:27.680] material I looked at, that there is an 18-something case that is still cited by the Texas courts [13:27.680 --> 13:37.160] dealing with the rules of criminal procedure that has been dead since 1985 at the very [13:37.160 --> 13:44.320] least and yet they're still citing it as a controlling authority and yet the statute [13:44.320 --> 13:50.320] that it addresses was amended to make what is found, held to be true in that case, no [13:50.320 --> 14:00.560] longer valid and yet the courts of Texas are still citing it as valid authority. [14:00.560 --> 14:07.880] And you wonder why you cannot get justice in these courts. [14:07.880 --> 14:17.520] So not only do they have a due process problem, but this due process problem directly contributes [14:17.520 --> 14:23.400] to the lack of evidence problem and the lack of evidence begins with the loss of the presumption [14:23.400 --> 14:29.000] of innocence by the court's failure to provide a proper examining trial to get the facts [14:29.000 --> 14:32.080] on the table beforehand. [14:32.080 --> 14:39.200] Then they set it up in such a way that the subject matter to which a regulatory statute [14:39.200 --> 14:46.120] is attached is not considered an element of the offense that's required to be listed [14:46.120 --> 14:55.040] or proven and I'm not sure how that is supposed to work because think about this. [14:55.040 --> 14:59.360] Let's compare two products. [14:59.360 --> 15:04.400] This is how I'm going to do it in the material, so this is how I'm going to do it with you. [15:04.400 --> 15:07.880] In the material for the new book, we have two products. [15:07.880 --> 15:14.080] You have the Tootsie Roll Tootsie Pop and you have the Charms Blow Pop. [15:14.080 --> 15:20.800] From the outside, they look to be the same product, hard candy shell, stick crammed [15:20.800 --> 15:24.920] in one end, you lick it till you get to the middle and in the middle there's a treat. [15:24.920 --> 15:31.600] In those respects and the marketing concepts, those two products are identical. [15:31.600 --> 15:35.760] It's not until you actually get through the hard candy shell to what's in the middle that [15:35.760 --> 15:38.560] you learn for sure that they are different. [15:38.560 --> 15:43.480] One is a Tootsie Roll Center and the other is a Bubble Gum Center. [15:43.480 --> 15:47.480] Not the same in the middle at all, okay? [15:47.480 --> 15:53.040] So even though at first glance they appear to be the same, once you've dug in and you've [15:53.040 --> 16:00.040] gotten to the middle of things, you can positively say with 100% certainty they are no longer [16:00.040 --> 16:08.040] considered to be the same thing, nor could they be with anyone with disinformation, okay? [16:08.040 --> 16:13.600] So that is my metaphorical comparison for how this is going to work. [16:13.600 --> 16:18.920] In order, in either product, in order to get to that center, you must penetrate that hard [16:18.920 --> 16:20.520] candy shell. [16:20.520 --> 16:26.960] For the purposes of our discussion, that hard candy shell is the single subject clause of [16:26.960 --> 16:30.000] the Texas Constitution, okay? [16:30.000 --> 16:36.720] The single subject requirement that everything in that bill must pertain to, or it's not [16:36.720 --> 16:39.920] a valid entry into that bill. [16:39.920 --> 16:43.360] That statute's unconstitutional because it violates a single subject clause. [16:43.360 --> 16:45.680] All right, we're going to take a quick break. [16:45.680 --> 16:51.760] Go ahead and number 512-646-1984, give us a call, get in line, and we will be right [16:51.760 --> 17:00.960] back to continue our discussion. [17:00.960 --> 17:05.240] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [17:05.240 --> 17:06.240] Word? [17:06.240 --> 17:11.480] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture [17:11.480 --> 17:17.880] Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [17:17.880 --> 17:22.400] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [17:22.400 --> 17:24.800] dividing the word of truth. [17:24.800 --> 17:28.800] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the book of Mark, where we'll go verse [17:28.800 --> 17:32.120] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [17:32.120 --> 17:36.760] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [17:36.760 --> 17:39.120] and Christian character development. [17:39.120 --> 17:43.680] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [17:43.680 --> 17:48.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [17:48.000 --> 17:50.240] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [17:50.240 --> 17:56.680] So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire [17:56.680 --> 18:00.680] and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [18:00.680 --> 18:05.760] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.760 --> 18:09.440] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras Proven Method. [18:09.440 --> 18:13.800] Michael Muiris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [18:13.800 --> 18:14.800] can win, too. [18:14.800 --> 18:19.600] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [18:19.600 --> 18:25.360] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [18:25.360 --> 18:30.000] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [18:30.000 --> 18:34.200] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.200 --> 18:39.320] The Michael Mirras Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:39.320 --> 18:41.480] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.480 --> 18:47.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner [18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] or email MichaelMirras@yahoo.com. [18:50.000 --> 18:59.560] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [18:59.560 --> 19:00.560] net. [19:00.560 --> 19:07.560] If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:07.560 --> 19:11.560] We got it? [19:11.560 --> 19:21.560] Yeah, the storm loose, sunroofs in my head, wrap them in cyan, soft circus and dead, can't [19:21.560 --> 19:26.560] I be cold, my whole life spins into a brand new day? [19:26.560 --> 19:31.680] All right folks, we are back, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host [19:31.680 --> 19:32.680] Eddie Craig. [19:32.680 --> 19:34.920] It is March 6, 2023. [19:34.920 --> 19:36.560] We are live tonight. [19:36.560 --> 19:41.720] All right, get in to calling number if you want to call and get in line and talk tonight, [19:41.720 --> 19:42.720] 512-646-1984. [19:42.720 --> 19:49.080] I'm going to have one more segment here, this segment where I'm doing the discussion [19:49.080 --> 19:52.200] on this and then we're going to go ahead and start taking calls. [19:52.200 --> 19:56.200] So guys that are already on the board, give me this one more section and after that we'll [19:56.200 --> 19:59.200] start talking and see what you got. [19:59.200 --> 20:07.160] Okay, now besides the single subject matter, there is another problem with how they conduct [20:07.160 --> 20:13.840] evidence and make it admissible in these criminal traffic courts, okay? [20:13.840 --> 20:22.880] They allow every single element of the offense to be presumed true, okay? [20:22.880 --> 20:27.840] It also violates the right to be presumed innocent. [20:27.840 --> 20:32.760] Now how do I mean they presume every element to be true, okay? [20:32.760 --> 20:40.240] Well, let's look at the things that they would have to prove just again for simplicity's [20:40.240 --> 20:41.240] sake. [20:41.240 --> 20:52.800] Let's say you're charged with, well, anything, let's say you're just charged with an offense [20:52.800 --> 20:56.400] that specifically involves the operation of a motor vehicle. [20:56.400 --> 21:02.160] Let's say you fail to change, to signal before the change of a lane or you fail to signal [21:02.160 --> 21:06.120] prior to making a turn at an intersection, okay? [21:06.120 --> 21:12.280] Some of the things that they must allege in such a complaint is that A, you were operating [21:12.280 --> 21:18.320] a motor vehicle, there's two elements operating a motor vehicle or that you were a driver [21:18.320 --> 21:19.600] of a motor vehicle. [21:19.600 --> 21:25.400] Now remember, driver and operator are two differently defined terms. [21:25.400 --> 21:30.480] Which term is in effect at any given point within the statute depends on which one was [21:30.480 --> 21:36.240] defined locally for use within that statute and then what the specific offense itself, [21:36.240 --> 21:44.640] what term it uses to identify what definition it's relying on to convey its intent, okay? [21:44.640 --> 21:50.640] So if this offense statute specifically as a person commits an offense if they were operating [21:50.640 --> 21:56.560] a motor vehicle, that would be completely different if operate is the defined term in [21:56.560 --> 22:06.040] the statute and drive or driving or driver is not defined in that portion of the statute. [22:06.040 --> 22:15.920] The local use of operating a motor vehicle overrides their ability to substitute operator [22:15.920 --> 22:21.360] with driver and say that they're the same thing, you get it? [22:21.360 --> 22:27.280] They're doing this but it's not following the law, okay? [22:27.280 --> 22:34.200] It's actually a misapplication and misinterpretation of the law when they do it that way. [22:34.200 --> 22:39.240] Now on top of that, you take motor vehicle. [22:39.240 --> 22:44.200] Which definition of motor vehicle applies in this statute? [22:44.200 --> 22:49.040] Is it defined locally or are we still using the same definition that's put into the general [22:49.040 --> 22:53.880] definition that's in chapter 541 of the transportation code? [22:53.880 --> 22:58.640] Which definition is applicable in this particular offense statute? [22:58.640 --> 23:05.200] Then they have to have the element that you failed, they have to prove that you did not [23:05.200 --> 23:09.120] use your turn signal, okay? [23:09.120 --> 23:14.640] To either change the lane, which is an element along with the turn signal, along with the [23:14.640 --> 23:19.960] operate, along with the motor vehicle, all right? [23:19.960 --> 23:25.320] Or to make the turn, which making a right or left hand turn is also would be an element [23:25.320 --> 23:27.560] of the offense, okay? [23:27.560 --> 23:34.240] Those are the specific elements other than while engaged in transportation that must [23:34.240 --> 23:37.680] be asserted and proven at trial. [23:37.680 --> 23:42.720] And the complaint says that on or about this date, so and so person did then in there operate [23:42.720 --> 23:48.920] a motor vehicle and failed to use their turn signal to change the lane or to make the right [23:48.920 --> 23:53.680] hand turn at an intersection, blah, blah, blah, okay? [23:53.680 --> 24:01.680] Now the question is, since each of these terms are term specifically defined within the body [24:01.680 --> 24:09.360] of the statute, such as operator or driver or motor vehicle or turn signal or the right [24:09.360 --> 24:17.480] or left turn or the changing of a lane or the at an intersection, et cetera, et cetera, [24:17.480 --> 24:25.680] who is submitting evidence that that element is actually true? [24:25.680 --> 24:28.480] The answer is no one. [24:28.480 --> 24:35.560] No one is bringing evidence to court that you were in a motor vehicle. [24:35.560 --> 24:41.320] No one is bringing evidence to court to prove that you were an operator or a driver. [24:41.320 --> 24:48.800] No one is coming to court with evidence to prove that you used a signal on a motor vehicle [24:48.800 --> 24:56.640] or failed to use a signal on a motor vehicle to make a change of lanes or a turn at an intersection. [24:56.640 --> 25:03.760] There is no evidence for any of this that is being submitted into the court. [25:03.760 --> 25:10.240] What they are doing is they're allowing the police officer to testify to these elements [25:10.240 --> 25:14.440] as if they were already true. [25:14.440 --> 25:22.280] That they have been stipulated to by the defense and by the prosecution. [25:22.280 --> 25:26.520] And that is not the case. [25:26.520 --> 25:28.480] It has not been stipulated to. [25:28.480 --> 25:33.120] And there is no documentation, documentary evidence to be submitted to the court that [25:33.120 --> 25:35.520] proves them to be true. [25:35.520 --> 25:43.680] So what this comes down to is they are allowing an unqualified witness to provide expert testimony [25:43.680 --> 25:51.360] that it is his opinion that these elements are true without actually getting him sworn [25:51.360 --> 25:58.320] in as an expert witness or without actually having him provide evidence that his opinion [25:58.320 --> 26:00.000] is correct. [26:00.000 --> 26:02.320] Nothing. [26:02.320 --> 26:07.760] They're simply sidestepping the presumption of innocence of each of these elements and [26:07.760 --> 26:14.760] allowing this witness to testify that these elements are each one true with no evidence [26:14.760 --> 26:23.800] of any kind, no expert witness testimony of any kind, thus allowing the cop to make a [26:23.800 --> 26:33.480] legal conclusion on the stand as if it is valid evidence. [26:33.480 --> 26:42.200] Now if there are any attorneys out there that wish to prove me wrong on this point, I would [26:42.200 --> 26:50.280] love it if you would call into this show and explain to all of us exactly how that is an [26:50.280 --> 26:58.880] incorrect perspective of what's happening because it is what's happening. [26:58.880 --> 27:05.440] So the thing you've got to prove is why it's the correct thing to let happen, how it is [27:05.440 --> 27:08.480] justice to allow such a thing to happen. [27:08.480 --> 27:15.920] Because in my view, if I'm correct, this creates a two-tiered legal system. [27:15.920 --> 27:20.080] Those who have the right to justice through the presumption of innocence and those from [27:20.080 --> 27:27.120] whom you are stealing money that have no such presumption on their side. [27:27.120 --> 27:34.000] And thus, every element is automatically true and now the presumption of innocence is gone [27:34.000 --> 27:39.680] and if they want to win, they have to prove their innocence, which turns our criminal [27:39.680 --> 27:46.120] justice system upside down. [27:46.120 --> 27:58.120] It reverses the burden of proof, every bit of it completely unconstitutional. [27:58.120 --> 28:09.160] Now if there's a hole in my logic, I would really love it if someone would point it out. [28:09.160 --> 28:17.760] But show me another case of a different kind where they're allowed to do exactly what I've [28:17.760 --> 28:30.880] just described and that does not get overturned as being completely bogus. [28:30.880 --> 28:34.920] You are allowing a witness to get on the stand to provide false testimony. [28:34.920 --> 28:39.680] In other words, the prosecutor is subordinate perjury from a witness who is unqualified [28:39.680 --> 28:43.160] to testify to the things they're testifying to. [28:43.160 --> 28:52.160] They're absolutely unqualified and yet the court is letting them do it with no evidence [28:52.160 --> 28:56.960] of support, no other expert testimony in support. [28:56.960 --> 29:01.880] They're just letting the cop make their own legal conclusions and presuming those conclusions [29:01.880 --> 29:08.000] to be 100% true. [29:08.000 --> 29:16.840] Thus presuming the person charged is not innocent. [29:16.840 --> 29:22.440] That's a problem, okay? [29:22.440 --> 29:28.600] So I've tried for years to explain to you that you people are correct when you say that [29:28.600 --> 29:30.000] the system is rigged. [29:30.000 --> 29:33.160] It is absolutely rigged. [29:33.160 --> 29:38.480] The problem is, is you keep coming up with these really inventive ways to try to say [29:38.480 --> 29:43.760] how it's rigged that you can't support with evidence. [29:43.760 --> 29:51.800] However, everything I've just laid out for you is 100% supported by the existing evidence. [29:51.800 --> 29:54.960] It is supported by the very actions taken. [29:54.960 --> 29:57.640] It's supported by how they conduct these proceedings. [29:57.640 --> 30:02.560] It's supported in the record list. [30:02.560 --> 30:06.800] Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under [30:06.800 --> 30:08.280] the blood alcohol limit. [30:08.280 --> 30:13.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government [30:13.160 --> 30:15.720] cover-up in a moment. [30:15.720 --> 30:17.320] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.320 --> 30:20.920] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.920 --> 30:25.680] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.680 --> 30:30.600] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.600 --> 30:33.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.440 --> 30:37.760] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:37.760 --> 30:41.280] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.280 --> 30:44.680] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.680 --> 30:46.840] Ever hear the term fine farming? [30:46.840 --> 30:51.360] It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business [30:51.360 --> 30:53.680] in the Sunshine State of Florida. [30:53.680 --> 30:59.560] This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations. [30:59.560 --> 31:04.240] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. [31:04.240 --> 31:07.880] State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing. [31:07.880 --> 31:12.880] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document [31:12.880 --> 31:13.880] the problem. [31:13.880 --> 31:18.720] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed, [31:18.720 --> 31:21.560] perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier. [31:21.560 --> 31:26.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:51.600 --> 31:53.600] I'm an Air Force pilot. [31:53.600 --> 31:54.960] I'm a father who lost his son. [31:54.960 --> 31:57.560] We're Americans and we deserve the truth. [31:57.560 --> 32:25.560] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [32:25.560 --> 32:29.200] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the [32:29.200 --> 32:32.960] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [32:32.960 --> 32:35.360] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.360 --> 32:39.360] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [32:39.360 --> 32:40.680] ordering your copy today. [32:40.680 --> 32:44.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:44.000 --> 32:48.440] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [32:48.440 --> 32:50.760] documents and other useful resource material. [32:50.760 --> 32:54.720] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.720 --> 33:02.720] After your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve. [33:02.720 --> 33:23.720] Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:23.720 --> 33:25.960] All right folks, we are back. [33:25.960 --> 33:33.560] This is rule of law radio, the call in number 512-646-1984, okay, you want to call and get [33:33.560 --> 33:34.560] in line and talk. [33:34.560 --> 33:35.560] Let's get that done. [33:35.560 --> 33:43.320] Now we're going to start in with our callers, I'm sorry guys, I've got a dog trading thing [33:43.320 --> 33:48.040] going on here and I've got a girl that's got a real anxiety issue and she's clinging to [33:48.040 --> 33:49.520] me like saran wrap. [33:49.520 --> 33:53.200] All right, John in New York, what can we do for you? [33:53.200 --> 34:01.040] Well, we've got a situation and here is the situation, traffic ticket or not a traffic [34:01.040 --> 34:02.040] ticket. [34:02.040 --> 34:14.840] Someone claims that one of my relatives was seen driving erratically and supposedly the [34:14.840 --> 34:19.480] cop stopped him but no cop ever stopped him. [34:19.480 --> 34:28.760] And all of a sudden in the mail he got a letter that says you didn't answer the letter that [34:28.760 --> 34:35.720] we sent you therefore you've just lost your license. [34:35.720 --> 34:37.480] No cop stopped him. [34:37.480 --> 34:43.080] Well, here's the problem first off, number one, the United States Supreme Court has said [34:43.080 --> 34:46.720] can't suspend the license without a hearing. [34:46.720 --> 34:52.080] Number two, that hearing could not be conducted by surprise. [34:52.080 --> 34:57.520] Number three, no matter what the state law on the subject says, in order for them to [34:57.520 --> 35:03.480] have a valid hearing, they have to prove the other party got served. [35:03.480 --> 35:08.320] So this mail it and forget it and you don't have to prove you actually mailed it BS from [35:08.320 --> 35:13.080] the state doesn't fly even when it's written into statute. [35:13.080 --> 35:16.840] Okay, that was wonderful, please repeat that again. [35:16.840 --> 35:20.840] No, you'd like to go back and do the archive to get me to repeat it. [35:20.840 --> 35:25.120] Remember these things come out, I just feel I don't recall them breath for breath but [35:25.120 --> 35:33.120] still the point being that if the state says we sent you something but the state has no [35:33.120 --> 35:39.320] evidence such as a signature card or anything else that they sent it and you received it, [35:39.320 --> 35:46.880] how do they prove that you were served okay in a civil suit, would they get away with [35:46.880 --> 35:47.880] that? [35:47.880 --> 35:51.640] Absolutely not. [35:51.640 --> 35:55.680] There is no way they could get away with that in a civil suit. [35:55.680 --> 36:03.360] They have to prove the other side was served and if it turns out they falsified that proof [36:03.360 --> 36:07.280] then they've lost their case before they even got started. [36:07.280 --> 36:12.960] All the other side has to do is say, judge that receipt that they claim they have with [36:12.960 --> 36:18.400] a signature on it, that's not my client's signature, that's not my law firm's signature. [36:18.400 --> 36:23.480] We didn't sign as having received anything, my client never signed as having received [36:23.480 --> 36:29.200] anything and his signature looks nothing like the one that's on that piece of paper. [36:29.200 --> 36:33.960] Therefore we submit to the court that that receipt is a forgery and that this, the other [36:33.960 --> 36:43.800] party has decided to fraudulently pursue a false, a directed verdict in this court because [36:43.800 --> 36:48.600] we didn't respond to a service we never received. [36:48.600 --> 36:59.200] They want a default judgment claiming they served us and yet that receipt is a forgery. [36:59.200 --> 37:04.720] So how does the state prove they sent what they say they sent? [37:04.720 --> 37:09.440] If they can't, if there was no little green card or yellow card, whatever color it is. [37:09.440 --> 37:12.320] Well, here's what they're going to try to say. [37:12.320 --> 37:13.640] We put it in the mail. [37:13.640 --> 37:18.200] The statute says it's all we have to do. [37:18.200 --> 37:23.520] That's what they're going to try to say, presuming New York has such a statute like [37:23.520 --> 37:27.320] Texas does, okay? [37:27.320 --> 37:34.240] Yeah, the problem is putting it in the mail and saying you put it in the mail does not [37:34.240 --> 37:38.400] prove service on the other party. [37:38.400 --> 37:39.400] And they have to prove- [37:39.400 --> 37:42.400] And no statute is going to change that. [37:42.400 --> 37:45.640] And they have to prove the service, am I right? [37:45.640 --> 37:52.960] How can they pursue a suit in court without notifying the other party of the suit? [37:52.960 --> 37:59.400] In New York, these are civil, right, they're administrative, but administrative is just [37:59.400 --> 38:03.680] another form of civil. [38:03.680 --> 38:07.800] And administrative courts are the absolute worst about doing what you're describing. [38:07.800 --> 38:16.920] They're the ones that abuse that process constantly. [38:16.920 --> 38:23.400] So the bottom line is they've got to be able to prove that they noticed the driver. [38:23.400 --> 38:26.280] That they served the driver. [38:26.280 --> 38:27.440] They served the driver. [38:27.440 --> 38:28.440] Yes. [38:28.440 --> 38:33.200] And if they can't, obviously, their case goes to hell. [38:33.200 --> 38:34.200] Yeah. [38:34.200 --> 38:36.480] Well, yes and no. [38:36.480 --> 38:42.720] What happens then is they have to serve them again in a way that they can prove they were [38:42.720 --> 38:45.640] served, okay? [38:45.640 --> 38:50.880] So that means either a processed server or certified mail, return receipt requested or [38:50.880 --> 38:57.960] registered mail, something that requires a signature upon delivery. [38:57.960 --> 38:59.760] That's how they would prove service. [38:59.760 --> 39:00.760] Yeah. [39:00.760 --> 39:01.760] Okay. [39:01.760 --> 39:11.480] But the problem for them remains exactly the same, okay? [39:11.480 --> 39:13.240] How do they prove it? [39:13.240 --> 39:16.840] They're saying it doesn't hold water. [39:16.840 --> 39:24.960] I mean, if you were suing them and you couldn't prove you had served them before taking them [39:24.960 --> 39:28.200] into court, what would they do? [39:28.200 --> 39:31.160] You'll lose. [39:31.160 --> 39:32.560] No. [39:32.560 --> 39:38.440] They would immediately follow a dismissal request for failure to provide proper service [39:38.440 --> 39:41.640] and lack of notice. [39:41.640 --> 39:44.880] That's exactly what they would do. [39:44.880 --> 39:47.520] So that's exactly what we should do. [39:47.520 --> 39:48.520] Exactly. [39:48.520 --> 39:49.520] Okay. [39:49.520 --> 39:52.760] All right. [39:52.760 --> 39:56.920] They can't prove it. [39:56.920 --> 39:59.160] They've got no case. [39:59.160 --> 40:00.160] That's what it was. [40:00.160 --> 40:04.520] Well, what it sounds like you're saying, though, is they've already given pursuit of default [40:04.520 --> 40:05.520] judgment. [40:05.520 --> 40:09.160] So now he's going to have to sue them to get that judgment overturned. [40:09.160 --> 40:10.160] Yeah. [40:10.160 --> 40:15.000] Yeah, that's exactly what happened. [40:15.000 --> 40:19.640] They had a hearing and they didn't invite him to it is what it boils down to. [40:19.640 --> 40:20.640] Yeah. [40:20.640 --> 40:24.000] So they could extort money out of him later to get his license back because I guarantee [40:24.000 --> 40:26.320] you there's extra fees associated with it. [40:26.320 --> 40:27.320] Yeah. [40:27.320 --> 40:34.200] Well, you've got a Utica New York, you've got to contact them and you have to... [40:34.200 --> 40:35.600] Well, not just that. [40:35.600 --> 40:41.320] Whatever it was they were trying to prosecute or to charge him with in order to get to that [40:41.320 --> 40:50.040] point of a hearing, such as speeding or DUI or whatever, if they got a default judgment [40:50.040 --> 40:57.200] on that, then that's a two-fold problem for him and for them. [40:57.200 --> 40:58.200] You know what they said? [40:58.200 --> 41:05.520] They said that it was probably a police officer saw him and probably the cop stopped [41:05.520 --> 41:07.400] him, which never happened. [41:07.400 --> 41:08.400] And probably... [41:08.400 --> 41:11.560] Well, there are no probabilities. [41:11.560 --> 41:14.240] They either have evidence of it or they don't. [41:14.240 --> 41:19.200] And if they're saying, now, are you sure this is from a court or some state agency and not [41:19.200 --> 41:25.280] some law firm that's misleading the person it's addressed to? [41:25.280 --> 41:27.600] We don't know. [41:27.600 --> 41:32.480] He was told, get the Freedom of Information Act and you can find out how they did this [41:32.480 --> 41:33.480] to you. [41:33.480 --> 41:34.480] What? [41:34.480 --> 41:36.760] What are you talking about? [41:36.760 --> 41:38.880] Freedom of Information Act. [41:38.880 --> 41:42.720] They're claiming that a cop stopped him, saw he was... [41:42.720 --> 41:43.720] Wait a minute. [41:43.720 --> 41:47.280] Who is making the claim? [41:47.280 --> 41:52.720] Well, the Department of Motor Vehicles claims they sent a letter in the mail, which he [41:52.720 --> 41:53.720] never got. [41:53.720 --> 41:59.120] And you're positive the communication that you have is from the New York Department of [41:59.120 --> 42:00.720] Motor Vehicles. [42:00.720 --> 42:01.960] Yeah. [42:01.960 --> 42:07.960] And then we did get a letter in the mail from the DMV that said, well, you didn't respond [42:07.960 --> 42:13.280] to our first letter, so now your license goes bye-bye. [42:13.280 --> 42:14.400] Which they can't do. [42:14.400 --> 42:20.080] They can't do an administrative license revocation without a judicial intervention. [42:20.080 --> 42:21.080] They can't do it. [42:21.080 --> 42:22.080] That's what I... [42:22.080 --> 42:27.040] There's Supreme Court case law on that that says they can't do it, especially if that [42:27.040 --> 42:32.200] license is attached to an occupation. [42:32.200 --> 42:34.640] Well, there's no occupation, but... [42:34.640 --> 42:39.960] Well, if you have a license, the presumption is that it's for an occupation, no matter [42:39.960 --> 42:42.320] what kind of license it is. [42:42.320 --> 42:48.800] Because a license can only be applied to a privilege, not a right. [42:48.800 --> 42:49.800] I got you. [42:49.800 --> 42:50.800] I got you. [42:50.800 --> 42:51.800] Yeah. [42:51.800 --> 42:58.600] And then what they're trying to say is we sent you a letter, you didn't respond to it, [42:58.600 --> 43:03.160] now we're going to take your license away because you didn't respond to it, and he never [43:03.160 --> 43:05.320] got the letter to begin with. [43:05.320 --> 43:06.320] We got a letter that says... [43:06.320 --> 43:10.640] Well, again, they cannot prove receipt of the letter, so he's going to have to sue them [43:10.640 --> 43:12.440] and that's what he needs to do. [43:12.440 --> 43:13.440] Gotcha. [43:13.440 --> 43:14.440] Okay. [43:14.440 --> 43:15.440] All right. [43:15.440 --> 43:16.440] Okay. [43:16.440 --> 43:17.840] I think you just nailed it down. [43:17.840 --> 43:19.840] I think you nailed it down. [43:19.840 --> 43:20.840] Okay. [43:20.840 --> 43:21.840] Yes. [43:21.840 --> 43:22.840] Okay. [43:22.840 --> 43:30.520] Now, just one last thing, is there an administrative process for bad judgments that you have to [43:30.520 --> 43:34.280] exhaust before you pursue a suit? [43:34.280 --> 43:38.960] That's another question that has to be asked, okay? [43:38.960 --> 43:43.600] Remember the thing about that you did not attempt to reconcile all administrative remedies [43:43.600 --> 43:45.400] to the issue before filing suit? [43:45.400 --> 43:49.400] Well, that applies everywhere. [43:49.400 --> 43:53.560] Make sure there's not some appeals process for this that he has to go through first and [43:53.560 --> 43:54.560] be turned down. [43:54.560 --> 44:00.800] All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break. [44:00.800 --> 44:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:04.000 --> 44:09.960] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD [44:09.960 --> 44:14.680] course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [44:14.680 --> 44:18.920] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:18.920 --> 44:23.160] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:23.160 --> 44:28.440] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too. [44:28.440 --> 44:34.360] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.360 --> 44:38.880] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [44:38.880 --> 44:43.200] principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.200 --> 44:48.880] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:48.880 --> 44:52.160] prosay tactics, and much more. [44:52.160 --> 45:01.240] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:01.240 --> 45:02.240] I love logos. [45:02.240 --> 45:05.760] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [45:05.760 --> 45:08.400] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [45:08.400 --> 45:09.600] I need my truth fix. [45:09.600 --> 45:14.240] I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [45:14.240 --> 45:17.760] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really [45:17.760 --> 45:21.400] don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [45:21.400 --> 45:22.960] How can I help logos? [45:22.960 --> 45:24.920] Well, I'm glad you asked. [45:24.920 --> 45:27.920] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [45:27.920 --> 45:30.480] You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. [45:30.480 --> 45:32.480] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [45:32.480 --> 45:38.600] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo, and bookmark it. [45:38.600 --> 45:44.480] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and Logos gets a few pesos. [45:44.480 --> 45:45.480] Do I pay extra? [45:45.480 --> 45:46.480] No. [45:46.480 --> 45:48.240] Do I have anything different when I order? [45:48.240 --> 45:49.240] No. [45:49.240 --> 45:50.240] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [45:50.240 --> 45:51.240] No. [45:51.240 --> 45:52.240] I mean, yes. [45:52.240 --> 45:56.960] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [45:56.960 --> 45:57.960] Thank you so much. [45:57.960 --> 45:59.440] You're welcome. [45:59.440 --> 46:17.400] Happy holidays, Logos. [46:17.400 --> 46:30.280] All right, folks, we are packed, this is the London Outroom of All Radio Show with your [46:30.280 --> 46:31.280] host, Eddie Craig. [46:31.280 --> 46:34.760] It is March 6, 2023. [46:34.760 --> 46:38.280] We are live tonight, and they give me a call. [46:38.280 --> 46:44.960] All right, let's get this thing to work. [46:44.960 --> 46:45.960] I'm leaving. [46:45.960 --> 46:47.800] Let's get the button there we go. [46:47.800 --> 46:53.160] All right, now, I see John in New York is still on the line. [46:53.160 --> 46:55.480] John, was there something else you wanted to ask? [46:55.480 --> 46:57.480] No, I think that's it. [46:57.480 --> 46:58.880] Thanks an awful lot, Eddie. [46:58.880 --> 47:00.680] Okay, not a problem. [47:00.680 --> 47:02.320] Okay, I'm gone. [47:02.320 --> 47:03.320] Thank you very much. [47:03.320 --> 47:04.320] All right, have a good night. [47:04.320 --> 47:05.320] Yes, sir. [47:05.320 --> 47:07.920] All right, now we have Jerry in Pennsylvania. [47:07.920 --> 47:10.640] Jerry, what can we do for you? [47:10.640 --> 47:12.640] Yeah, Eddie. [47:12.640 --> 47:13.640] Yes? [47:13.640 --> 47:28.280] Yeah, the thing is, when the public official gets off the stand and is not testifying a [47:28.280 --> 47:41.680] line against you, and you go to the court, the upper court, they give you all this baloney [47:41.680 --> 47:49.040] about absolute immunity, qualified immunity, sovereign immunity. [47:49.040 --> 47:56.760] I've got a couple of them here, remember, from the circuit court and the U.S. court, [47:56.760 --> 48:03.960] where the judge keeps telling me that these public officials, like I say, when the trial [48:03.960 --> 48:09.120] is over to get done lying, that they've got immunity on all this stuff. [48:09.120 --> 48:14.120] Now, the thing is, if they keep telling me this case, I don't know what he might be [48:14.120 --> 48:23.960] going with it, Bosco versus LaHue, and that was the case there, where the cop lied on [48:23.960 --> 48:30.640] the stand, and then after the trial was over and everything, the guy went to the appeals [48:30.640 --> 48:41.680] court, and they got it out of the 7th circuit there, and they said that they had absolute [48:41.680 --> 48:42.680] immunity. [48:42.680 --> 48:48.120] Here's the deal. [48:48.120 --> 48:52.960] The qualified immunity BS is exactly that, it's BS. [48:52.960 --> 48:57.360] But here's the way it's working at the moment. [48:57.360 --> 49:03.760] You have every court below the Supreme Court of the United States that is attempting to [49:03.760 --> 49:13.000] pass the buck instead of render an opinion on virtually any case that involves public [49:13.000 --> 49:14.880] officials. [49:14.880 --> 49:19.520] They don't want to be the one that holds the public official accountable. [49:19.520 --> 49:28.120] So they throw out qualified or official immunity at every turn of the hat in order to not have [49:28.120 --> 49:34.080] to render that opinion, and then they use the excuse that the particular facts of this [49:34.080 --> 49:42.680] case are not 100% on point with the facts of a case already decided, either at this [49:42.680 --> 49:51.360] level or a higher level court to make what you're alleging an actual rights violation [49:51.360 --> 49:52.960] in and of itself. [49:52.960 --> 49:58.280] Now that's what the lower courts are all doing, every last one of them. [49:58.280 --> 50:04.160] However, I forget which case it is, but it wasn't all that long ago, the United States [50:04.160 --> 50:11.080] Supreme Court finally handed down an opinion that says that is not how the qualified immunity [50:11.080 --> 50:14.680] doctrine is supposed to work. [50:14.680 --> 50:19.080] The case does not have to be 100% on point. [50:19.080 --> 50:24.680] It just has to have a similar fact pattern and elements. [50:24.680 --> 50:33.320] If it can be associated fact wise and circumstance wise, then it's on point enough to make a [50:33.320 --> 50:38.520] determination about qualified or official immunity. [50:38.520 --> 50:46.720] Now the only people that have absolute immunity for their acts in their official capacities [50:46.720 --> 50:48.600] are judges. [50:48.600 --> 50:52.240] Right or wrong, it's judges and they gave it to themselves. [50:52.240 --> 50:58.160] There's no law that gives it to them, they gave it to themselves. [50:58.160 --> 51:07.080] Not even a prosecutor is 100% immune for his actions in his official capacity if it is shown [51:07.080 --> 51:12.120] that his actions actually constituted a violation of the rights of the unknowing and willful [51:12.120 --> 51:15.880] violation of the rights of the individual. [51:15.880 --> 51:20.800] We know this because of the recent cases where these prosecutors who sent people to prison [51:20.800 --> 51:27.080] on trumped up charges they knew to be false are now being prosecuted and sued and it's [51:27.080 --> 51:29.520] allowed to happen. [51:29.520 --> 51:34.840] Now it doesn't happen often, not nearly as much as it probably needs to happen and should [51:34.840 --> 51:41.000] happen but it is happening from time to time. [51:41.000 --> 51:49.160] That doesn't happen with judges, okay, and they gave themselves that immunity. [51:49.160 --> 51:56.120] So therein lies the problem that you're dealing with, however, the claim of immunity without [51:56.120 --> 52:04.360] proof that they've looked at the other cases that are similar, not just exactly the same [52:04.360 --> 52:13.000] but are at least similar enough to be applicable, then that's an appeal that can be made that [52:13.000 --> 52:18.600] the court abused its discretion in holding that qualified or absolute or official immunity [52:18.600 --> 52:20.840] even applied. [52:20.840 --> 52:23.040] And you go from there. [52:23.040 --> 52:32.160] Well, that's what I usually do anyway when they throw a case in that, I usually go through [52:32.160 --> 52:38.360] the case, read the whole thing, decipher it, then sit down and write it up and throw it [52:38.360 --> 52:44.360] right back at him and point out what the problem was with the case in the first place. [52:44.360 --> 52:50.680] It takes a lot of time to do but that's the only way you're going to do it. [52:50.680 --> 52:58.640] I know for a fact that one case here where the guy was playing his radio too loud and [52:58.640 --> 53:04.240] he went to court and everything, he lost the case, they keep throwing that thing at me [53:04.240 --> 53:08.800] and I keep, I already know the neighborhood, I even know the town. [53:08.800 --> 53:16.120] I know how crooked the shrub is in that town and I'm playing so I know firsthand, I don't [53:16.120 --> 53:21.400] know the people in the case but I know about the case and the vicinity is different so [53:21.400 --> 53:26.080] I have some idea of what these circuit judges are doing. [53:26.080 --> 53:33.840] And what I did is like this one here, what's the same thing but here you go again if they're [53:33.840 --> 53:42.400] outside of scope and I've got the testimony of the witness on the witness stand lying [53:42.400 --> 53:45.720] and then I have documents where... [53:45.720 --> 53:48.440] How are you proving the witnesses lying? [53:48.440 --> 53:55.160] The statement, the declaratory statement. [53:55.160 --> 54:00.480] When they get these public officials in office, they're not all that bright, they're somebody's [54:00.480 --> 54:01.480] relative. [54:01.480 --> 54:06.160] That's the whole problem with most of these cops running around, they have no idea what [54:06.160 --> 54:10.440] the tax is going on, their brother-in-law or something, they won the election and they [54:10.440 --> 54:14.080] call them over and say, hey, Harry, come on over, give me the uniform, give me the gun, [54:14.080 --> 54:16.240] go to work, you know you got a job. [54:16.240 --> 54:19.720] Well, you can see that even right now in that circuit. [54:19.720 --> 54:23.400] That doesn't help what we're trying to figure out here. [54:23.400 --> 54:25.400] What declaratory statement? [54:25.400 --> 54:32.120] Well, no, no, in a declaratory statement, right, didn't coincide with the testimony [54:32.120 --> 54:36.240] that was given on the stand, you know what I mean? [54:36.240 --> 54:41.000] Is the declaratory statement signed under oath and penalty of perjury? [54:41.000 --> 54:44.400] Yeah, it's signed in a... [54:44.400 --> 54:50.400] No, is it signed under oath and penalty of perjury? [54:50.400 --> 54:54.200] It says that right on there. [54:54.200 --> 54:55.440] Okay. [54:55.440 --> 55:02.400] If that's the case, then how are you using it to prove that the testimony is false? [55:02.400 --> 55:10.280] Well, I think declaratory judgment, it doesn't go out, everything that was just on that. [55:10.280 --> 55:20.960] A declaratory judgment and a declaratory statement are not the same thing. [55:20.960 --> 55:23.920] Okay, I got it here. [55:23.920 --> 55:27.640] I can't put my fingers on it right away. [55:27.640 --> 55:32.040] The declaratory statement, you're right, the declaratory statement, that's what it [55:32.040 --> 55:33.040] is. [55:33.040 --> 55:34.040] Okay. [55:34.040 --> 55:38.480] I don't know, I haven't seen it, I'm assuming you're right, you should know you're the [55:38.480 --> 55:39.480] one reading it. [55:39.480 --> 55:43.720] I'm just telling you that a judgment and a statement are not the same thing. [55:43.720 --> 55:47.360] I didn't know there was a declaratory judgment. [55:47.360 --> 55:52.040] Yes, that's what happens in a civil suit when one side defaults, they get a declaratory [55:52.040 --> 55:54.440] judgment in their favor. [55:54.440 --> 55:55.440] Yeah. [55:55.440 --> 55:59.480] The court declares them the winner, hence declaratory judgment. [55:59.480 --> 56:00.480] No. [56:00.480 --> 56:02.760] Okay, you've caught me off guard. [56:02.760 --> 56:08.800] I know what the difference has been, so okay, so you take the testimony and you take the [56:08.800 --> 56:13.800] transcript and you put the whole thing together and write it up, right? [56:13.800 --> 56:14.800] Okay. [56:14.800 --> 56:15.800] Right. [56:15.800 --> 56:22.480] Well, that's how you prove that they're lying. [56:22.480 --> 56:30.960] And then they come back and they say, well, we got absolute immunity from a 1983 suit [56:30.960 --> 56:35.800] for damages based upon the performance of the testimony. [56:35.800 --> 56:40.400] Well, who is the witness that provided the testimony? [56:40.400 --> 56:44.320] The public official, the township. [56:44.320 --> 56:53.320] I had the code enforcement officer come in here and tell me that this place was a you-know-what [56:53.320 --> 56:58.320] and gave me 40 tickets, like patients. [56:58.320 --> 57:00.320] So we were caught over. [57:00.320 --> 57:01.320] What place? [57:01.320 --> 57:02.320] And I sued him. [57:02.320 --> 57:03.320] No. [57:03.320 --> 57:04.320] Where I live. [57:04.320 --> 57:12.720] I got junk vehicles, my car is junk, the grass is too high, there's no lid on the trash [57:12.720 --> 57:21.240] town, you know, all that stuff, whatever they could find, you know, you've got a dog, you've [57:21.240 --> 57:27.040] got a cat, you've got chickens, you've got a goldfish, I mean, you name it, you know. [57:27.040 --> 57:31.400] Are the things they're charging you with things that are enacted by the state legislature [57:31.400 --> 57:34.480] or are these local ordinance policies? [57:34.480 --> 57:36.680] There's some local ordinance. [57:36.680 --> 57:37.680] Okay. [57:37.680 --> 57:44.000] Then where do they have jurisdiction to apply them to private property and private people? [57:44.000 --> 57:49.560] Does your state constitution give municipalities and counties the ability to create local ordinances [57:49.560 --> 57:54.320] as if they're the same as binding public law or does your constitution only give your [57:54.320 --> 57:59.240] legislature the power to create binding public law? [57:59.240 --> 58:06.320] When I sat in the courtroom, I told Judd that he did not have rhetoric matters, he ignored [58:06.320 --> 58:09.960] me and right to the city attorney to start. [58:09.960 --> 58:10.960] Okay. [58:10.960 --> 58:11.960] Hold on. [58:11.960 --> 58:12.960] Stop, stop, stop. [58:12.960 --> 58:13.960] Hang on. [58:13.960 --> 58:16.960] Let me take this break and we'll continue this conversation on the other side. [58:16.960 --> 58:17.960] All right. [58:17.960 --> 58:18.960] 512-646-1984. [58:18.960 --> 58:22.280] I need some callers to talk to. [58:22.280 --> 58:26.680] I got an hour left in this show and I would really like to talk to some folks. [58:26.680 --> 58:29.560] We're going to try to get this thing rolling back in the way it used to be. [58:29.560 --> 58:32.240] So please get in line, give us a call and let's talk. [58:32.240 --> 58:33.240] Y'all hang on. [58:33.240 --> 58:50.240] We'll be right back after this break. [58:50.240 --> 58:55.680] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.680 --> 58:58.480] because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.480 --> 59:03.880] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [59:03.880 --> 59:07.120] the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:07.120 --> 59:08.920] Enter the recovery version. [59:08.920 --> 59:14.840] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more [59:14.840 --> 59:18.560] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.560 --> 59:23.520] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance [59:23.520 --> 59:28.240] into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.240 --> 59:33.400] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.400 --> 59:43.840] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.840 --> 59:47.880] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.880 --> 59:49.880] That's freestudybible.com. [59:49.880 --> 59:56.760] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [59:56.760 --> 01:00:04.480] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:04.480 --> 01:00:07.920] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:07.920 --> 01:00:09.440] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:09.440 --> 01:00:13.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:00:13.320 --> 01:00:16.000] one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:18.040] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:18.040 --> 01:00:21.640] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:21.640 --> 01:00:26.440] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:26.440 --> 01:00:31.680] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:31.680 --> 01:00:34.200] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:38.520] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [01:00:38.520 --> 01:00:42.000] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:45.600] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:45.600 --> 01:00:49.960] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [01:00:49.960 --> 01:00:52.040] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [01:00:52.040 --> 01:00:56.520] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms. [01:00:56.520 --> 01:01:00.400] Arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [01:01:00.400 --> 01:01:01.400] Get it? [01:01:01.400 --> 01:01:02.400] Two arms? [01:01:02.400 --> 01:01:03.400] Bear hug? [01:01:03.400 --> 01:01:04.400] Bear arms? [01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:07.360] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:12.080] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against [01:01:12.080 --> 01:01:17.240] arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [01:01:17.240 --> 01:01:20.240] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:33.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:33.400 --> 01:01:37.880] You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but new research shows that as brains get [01:01:37.880 --> 01:01:40.160] older, they actually work more efficiently. [01:01:40.160 --> 01:01:45.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper [01:01:45.600 --> 01:01:47.360] after this. [01:01:47.360 --> 01:01:49.080] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.080 --> 01:01:52.680] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.680 --> 01:01:57.680] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.680 --> 01:01:59.200] So protect your rights. [01:01:59.200 --> 01:02:02.880] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.880 --> 01:02:05.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:02:05.440 --> 01:02:11.160] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:02:11.160 --> 01:02:12.760] Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:12.760 --> 01:02:16.400] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:20.920] It's a widely held notion that the older people get, the more doddering they become. [01:02:20.920 --> 01:02:26.640] But new research shows that even as our brains age, they can actually become more efficient. [01:02:26.640 --> 01:02:33.600] Scientists ask two groups of volunteers, one age 18 to 35 and the other 55 to 75, to associate [01:02:33.600 --> 01:02:35.880] different words with given topics. [01:02:35.880 --> 01:02:39.040] At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake. [01:02:39.040 --> 01:02:42.600] When that happened, the younger groups' brains lit up and lost focus. [01:02:42.600 --> 01:02:47.000] But the older groups' brains didn't even flinch, and they stayed focused on solving [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:48.320] the next task. [01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:49.320] The moral? [01:02:49.320 --> 01:02:51.040] There's something to be said for experience. [01:02:51.040 --> 01:03:18.040] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:03:18.040 --> 01:03:23.040] All right folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio, Monday Night Show, with your host, [01:03:23.040 --> 01:03:25.600] Eddie Craig, and it's March 6, 2023. [01:03:25.600 --> 01:03:29.120] We are live tonight, and we are going good. [01:03:29.120 --> 01:03:31.760] Right now, we are talking to Jerry in Pennsylvania. [01:03:31.760 --> 01:03:38.080] All right, Jerry, let's continue this on and see if we can wrap it up. [01:03:38.080 --> 01:03:41.760] What exactly is your question for me? [01:03:41.760 --> 01:03:49.240] Well, they keep throwing this qualified immunity at me, so I thought I'd call you and see if [01:03:49.240 --> 01:03:51.840] you could explain it. [01:03:51.840 --> 01:04:00.200] But like you say, I read someplace for what you said, it hit me just now, that there was [01:04:00.200 --> 01:04:07.840] something at the seventh circuit over there on a case that somebody was trying to, a lawyer [01:04:07.840 --> 01:04:15.040] or something, was trying to explain what you were saying, and I started looking for just [01:04:15.040 --> 01:04:22.320] Supreme Court cases now, so that I'd avoid any circuit cases, you know what I mean? [01:04:22.320 --> 01:04:27.480] So if I spend the time reading the circuit case and find out it's no good anyway, they're [01:04:27.480 --> 01:04:28.880] trying to dodge it. [01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:29.880] Exactly. [01:04:29.880 --> 01:04:35.200] The Supreme Court case will overrule the circuit case no matter what the circuit case is. [01:04:35.200 --> 01:04:42.280] Yeah, but the Supreme Court is held to a higher standard, so they'd have to... [01:04:42.280 --> 01:04:43.280] No, they're not. [01:04:43.280 --> 01:04:46.120] Who holds the Supreme Court to a higher standard? [01:04:46.120 --> 01:04:48.280] Who's above them? [01:04:48.280 --> 01:04:49.720] Absolutely nobody. [01:04:49.720 --> 01:04:52.400] And they're appointed for life in good behavior. [01:04:52.400 --> 01:04:58.360] So unless they get impeached for bad behavior, they're not held to any standard other than [01:04:58.360 --> 01:05:06.000] public opinion that doesn't get them out of office and doesn't affect how they do things. [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.200] Well I figured the Congress put some pressure on it because the voters... [01:05:10.200 --> 01:05:14.640] The only thing Congress can do is impeach them for bad behavior. [01:05:14.640 --> 01:05:19.080] Can you tell me how many times in our nation's history that has actually happened to a United [01:05:19.080 --> 01:05:22.360] States Supreme Court justice? [01:05:22.360 --> 01:05:23.960] No matter how bad they were? [01:05:23.960 --> 01:05:28.480] I've never heard of it, I've never heard of one of the judges getting kicked off. [01:05:28.480 --> 01:05:29.480] I've heard of it. [01:05:29.480 --> 01:05:31.360] It ain't happened in my lifetime. [01:05:31.360 --> 01:05:32.360] Louisiana. [01:05:32.360 --> 01:05:34.800] But I don't know what... [01:05:34.800 --> 01:05:42.480] I got it here someplace, they kicked a circuit judge off the bench in Louisiana circuit. [01:05:42.480 --> 01:05:43.480] What circuit that is? [01:05:43.480 --> 01:05:48.840] I don't know, but instead of Louisiana, I don't know, seven, I don't know which one [01:05:48.840 --> 01:05:49.840] that was. [01:05:49.840 --> 01:05:54.840] Louisiana is at least part of it, it's under the fifth circuit, I think. [01:05:54.840 --> 01:06:01.800] Well, I put it on the side, but I got so much stuff here that I didn't really know who [01:06:01.800 --> 01:06:04.760] the heck cares what a judge does his job. [01:06:04.760 --> 01:06:09.640] But I guess I'm going to have to find it and find out why they kicked me out, what was [01:06:09.640 --> 01:06:10.640] the reason. [01:06:10.640 --> 01:06:12.960] There might be something interesting there. [01:06:12.960 --> 01:06:15.400] In fact, maybe I could use it. [01:06:15.400 --> 01:06:21.920] I know a couple of times, stuff that's down to, you know, regardless, you can use in [01:06:21.920 --> 01:06:25.720] some of these cases, you know? [01:06:25.720 --> 01:06:29.920] If you can show that the case is at least somewhat on point with how you're trying to [01:06:29.920 --> 01:06:31.320] use it, yes. [01:06:31.320 --> 01:06:35.360] Otherwise, the opposing counsel is going to bring up the fact that it's not relevant [01:06:35.360 --> 01:06:40.080] to this case because the issues in that case are not the same as the issues in this case. [01:06:40.080 --> 01:06:43.600] Oh, yeah, I'll make sure they're pretty close. [01:06:43.600 --> 01:06:50.320] So here's the thing is that every time these judges send me something, it's always something [01:06:50.320 --> 01:06:52.760] that has nothing to do with the case anyway. [01:06:52.760 --> 01:06:54.600] Yeah, and that part's true. [01:06:54.600 --> 01:06:57.800] They do that a lot, but they sure won't let you get away with it. [01:06:57.800 --> 01:06:58.800] Oh, yeah. [01:06:58.800 --> 01:07:03.480] If they can do it, that's fine, but they don't want you, a layman or anybody else, getting [01:07:03.480 --> 01:07:07.440] away with it and proving that they don't know what the hell they're doing because that's [01:07:07.440 --> 01:07:09.640] exactly what it would prove. [01:07:09.640 --> 01:07:13.960] Well, this is what I'm trying to write now. [01:07:13.960 --> 01:07:15.720] I got like 12 pages here. [01:07:15.720 --> 01:07:19.480] I spent two, three weeks on stupid things. [01:07:19.480 --> 01:07:27.760] I sent in a complaint disability on this judge, right, in fact, two or three judges [01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:28.760] over there. [01:07:28.760 --> 01:07:34.920] Anyway, so I figured I'd get one, I took the worst one, and that's when I was writing [01:07:34.920 --> 01:07:35.920] it up. [01:07:35.920 --> 01:07:42.680] This is what I was working on, was disqualified immunity to keep doing. [01:07:42.680 --> 01:07:48.360] I got all the other ones that they said, I pretty much tore them all apart and everything. [01:07:48.360 --> 01:07:51.560] So this is not going as a motion or anything. [01:07:51.560 --> 01:07:57.560] This is going to a complaint against a judge, a U.S. judge. [01:07:57.560 --> 01:08:00.600] So it's going over to the chief circuit judge. [01:08:00.600 --> 01:08:01.600] Okay. [01:08:01.600 --> 01:08:08.880] So if he buys it, if he buys it, then I guess what is he going to do, kick the judge off [01:08:08.880 --> 01:08:09.880] the bench? [01:08:09.880 --> 01:08:15.280] Well, they'll put it under a judicial review hearing probably, but yeah, they'll do something [01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:17.880] if they find it noteworthy to do something. [01:08:17.880 --> 01:08:26.760] Yeah, they always, the three judges are always on the paperwork here, and I always, I always [01:08:26.760 --> 01:08:32.040] follow on them anyway, you know, to make sure that they know that I'm out here. [01:08:32.040 --> 01:08:33.040] Okay. [01:08:33.040 --> 01:08:34.040] You know what I'm saying? [01:08:34.040 --> 01:08:36.040] Well, give it a shot and see what happens. [01:08:36.040 --> 01:08:37.040] Okay. [01:08:37.040 --> 01:08:38.040] All right. [01:08:38.040 --> 01:08:39.040] All right. [01:08:39.040 --> 01:08:40.040] Thank you. [01:08:40.040 --> 01:08:41.040] You're welcome, Jerry. [01:08:41.040 --> 01:08:42.040] Thanks for calling. [01:08:42.040 --> 01:08:43.040] All right. [01:08:43.040 --> 01:08:45.040] Have a good night. [01:08:45.040 --> 01:08:46.200] All right. [01:08:46.200 --> 01:08:49.480] Our next caller up is Reina in Utah. [01:08:49.480 --> 01:08:50.480] It looks like. [01:08:50.480 --> 01:08:52.000] Reina, what can I do for you? [01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:53.000] Hey, Eddie. [01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:54.000] How are you? [01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:55.000] I'm good. [01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:56.000] And you? [01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:57.000] I'm good. [01:08:57.000 --> 01:08:58.000] Good. [01:08:58.000 --> 01:08:59.000] Welcome back to the airwaves. [01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:00.000] I missed you. [01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Well, thank you. [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000] A couple of Mondays there. [01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:05.000] I didn't know I was that popular in Utah. [01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:06.000] Well, yeah. [01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:11.640] Well, you just, everything that you have on your website and everything applies specifically [01:09:11.640 --> 01:09:16.640] to my case, it seems like, so I like it when you're, when you come on live. [01:09:16.640 --> 01:09:21.400] So the case, my case, I don't know if you remember. [01:09:21.400 --> 01:09:25.440] There were three cops that pulled me and my brother over. [01:09:25.440 --> 01:09:27.960] I had a dog did a search and all that. [01:09:27.960 --> 01:09:33.880] So I submitted for a FOIA request and I know it could have been part of my discovery, or [01:09:33.880 --> 01:09:37.600] at least I think it could have been, but I didn't know that at the time, but I still [01:09:37.600 --> 01:09:38.600] got the information. [01:09:38.600 --> 01:09:48.000] So I asked for the, the dog's certification and training like you told me to, and his [01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:52.800] is expired two years prior. [01:09:52.800 --> 01:09:59.360] And then all three of the cops, I asked for their oath of office and their surety bonds [01:09:59.360 --> 01:10:05.160] and the reply was, we don't have any oath of office on record and we don't know what [01:10:05.160 --> 01:10:07.240] you mean by surety bond. [01:10:07.240 --> 01:10:09.840] Who did you ask for that information? [01:10:09.840 --> 01:10:16.720] Well, they have a, you do it online here and it's a site just called, it's called [01:10:16.720 --> 01:10:23.920] grandma, government record, something, something, something, management. [01:10:23.920 --> 01:10:30.920] Okay, but understand something that system may only cover statewide records. [01:10:30.920 --> 01:10:37.080] It may not cover local records and depending upon how your state constitution or your state [01:10:37.080 --> 01:10:44.440] law requires certain kinds of records to be kept, like for example, here in Texas, local [01:10:44.440 --> 01:10:51.880] cops, oath of office are kept by the municipality. [01:10:51.880 --> 01:11:00.320] And the secretary, the city secretary is the custodian of record for the municipality. [01:11:00.320 --> 01:11:06.240] She's the one that has their oath of offices, not their police department, not the state, [01:11:06.240 --> 01:11:13.000] not the district, but that city that employs that cop has their oath of office. [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:17.640] They're the ones that had to administer it and they're the ones that keep it on file. [01:11:17.640 --> 01:11:23.800] Then when you have people like say, for instance, district judges here in the state of Texas, [01:11:23.800 --> 01:11:30.920] a district judge's oath of office is actually held at the secretary of state's office. [01:11:30.920 --> 01:11:36.600] Whereas the county judges, the county courts of law and the justices of the peace and [01:11:36.600 --> 01:11:45.560] municipal court judges, the municipal court judges records are held by the municipal municipality, [01:11:45.560 --> 01:11:46.840] just like the cops. [01:11:46.840 --> 01:11:53.200] The justice of the pieces records are held by the county clerk, as are the county court [01:11:53.200 --> 01:11:55.960] judges such as the constitutional county court. [01:11:55.960 --> 01:12:04.320] But the county court at law, they're, yeah, I'm sorry, the county court at law is also [01:12:04.320 --> 01:12:07.440] held by the county clerk if I'm not mistaken here in Texas. [01:12:07.440 --> 01:12:12.120] So again, who you ask for that record can directly impact about whether or not they [01:12:12.120 --> 01:12:14.600] have it and you find it. [01:12:14.600 --> 01:12:19.160] So don't presume that a cop's records are kept in this database you're talking about [01:12:19.160 --> 01:12:24.440] if you have not specifically gone to the municipality that employs them and made the same request. [01:12:24.440 --> 01:12:25.440] Okay. [01:12:25.440 --> 01:12:32.760] Well, one of the things that they do is they publish every request they make it public. [01:12:32.760 --> 01:12:38.000] And so I just, you know, scrolled through the list and I saw a few other sheriffs both [01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:40.800] of office within this list. [01:12:40.800 --> 01:12:48.400] But the sheriff is a county wide official, which still differentiates them from a municipality, [01:12:48.400 --> 01:12:54.120] which is only a local area official, right. [01:12:54.120 --> 01:13:00.720] And so the request that I submitted was to the county actually, and it has been a sheriff's [01:13:00.720 --> 01:13:01.720] deputy. [01:13:01.720 --> 01:13:02.720] Yes. [01:13:02.720 --> 01:13:03.720] Okay. [01:13:03.720 --> 01:13:04.720] Yeah. [01:13:04.720 --> 01:13:09.200] And the county said they didn't have any such records. [01:13:09.200 --> 01:13:10.200] Yeah. [01:13:10.200 --> 01:13:11.200] Yep. [01:13:11.200 --> 01:13:12.200] They said they didn't have any. [01:13:12.200 --> 01:13:18.560] And does the state constitution and state law require such an oath to exist and be kept? [01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:20.520] I believe so. [01:13:20.520 --> 01:13:25.520] And who does the constitution or state law identify as the peer as the person responsible [01:13:25.520 --> 01:13:29.200] for the maintenance of that record? [01:13:29.200 --> 01:13:32.440] What was that last part again? [01:13:32.440 --> 01:13:38.520] What does the constitution or the state law say about who is responsible, the custodian [01:13:38.520 --> 01:13:42.920] for that specific record for that specific level? [01:13:42.920 --> 01:13:43.920] Okay. [01:13:43.920 --> 01:13:49.360] Does it say who has to maintain it and where? [01:13:49.360 --> 01:13:50.360] And then for how long? [01:13:50.360 --> 01:13:51.360] I believe it does. [01:13:51.360 --> 01:13:52.360] I just don't know. [01:13:52.360 --> 01:13:53.360] Okay. [01:13:53.360 --> 01:13:57.860] And does it, and does your state constitution or your state law state what does the state [01:13:57.860 --> 01:14:06.480] law, what are the consequences for such an oath or document not existing? [01:14:06.480 --> 01:14:13.200] For instance, here in Texas, the state constitution says no person can assume the capacity of [01:14:13.200 --> 01:14:19.160] their, and affect any of the duties of their official office until that oath has been filed. [01:14:19.160 --> 01:14:26.000] And that oath cannot be filed until the anti bribery statement has been filed. [01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:33.960] So here they have to actually have two under oath statements on file before they can even [01:14:33.960 --> 01:14:37.800] begin to act in an official capacity. [01:14:37.800 --> 01:14:41.160] What does your state say about that? [01:14:41.160 --> 01:14:42.280] That's a very good question. [01:14:42.280 --> 01:14:48.680] I don't know entirely and I should have taken a look at that before I jumped on, but I will [01:14:48.680 --> 01:14:53.400] now and just make sure that I cover all my bases. [01:14:53.400 --> 01:14:59.280] Now be aware that this is an argument that the courts tend to ignore, but the problem [01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:06.360] is for by them ignoring it, they're never addressing the issue of the individual in question acting [01:15:06.360 --> 01:15:09.000] without lawful legitimate authority. [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:13.080] They're simply presuming the existence of that authority because the person's committing [01:15:13.080 --> 01:15:20.920] the acts and wearing the uniform and therefore are considered disure rightful officers. [01:15:20.920 --> 01:15:25.280] The problem is that the state constitution or state law says that they cannot perform [01:15:25.280 --> 01:15:29.160] those duties without that paperwork having been filed. [01:15:29.160 --> 01:15:31.760] They can't be disure. [01:15:31.760 --> 01:15:39.760] There is no legitimately legal way to hold them as being disure and they are only de facto [01:15:39.760 --> 01:15:42.520] meaning they are actually an officer. [01:15:42.520 --> 01:15:51.560] In fact, when those documents that are required by constitution law or both have been filed [01:15:51.560 --> 01:15:58.520] to complete the cycle that delegates that power into their hands. [01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:04.740] If that hasn't happened, they're acting illegally without lawful authority and a disure declaration [01:16:04.740 --> 01:16:09.480] by the court is a violation of state law and the state constitution if and when they [01:16:09.480 --> 01:16:12.800] do that. [01:16:12.800 --> 01:16:21.400] Okay, so I'll look those things up and verify for sure. [01:16:21.400 --> 01:16:27.480] Now if you know it says that they have to have those and and all of that or they haven't [01:16:27.480 --> 01:16:34.760] completed their duties to have that authority, do I have remedy against them? [01:16:34.760 --> 01:16:41.120] Sure, you can if they if you've got a conviction, you can seek to have it overturned because [01:16:41.120 --> 01:16:44.580] the initial seizure was illegal and unconstitutional. [01:16:44.580 --> 01:16:47.680] There's all kinds of ways to a collateral the attack it on those grounds. [01:16:47.680 --> 01:16:48.680] Hang on just a second. [01:16:48.680 --> 01:16:50.960] Let me take this break and then we'll finish up. [01:16:50.960 --> 01:16:51.960] Okay. [01:16:51.960 --> 01:16:52.960] All right, folks, 512-646-1984. [01:16:52.960 --> 01:16:53.960] Give us a call. [01:16:53.960 --> 01:16:54.960] Get in line. [01:16:54.960 --> 01:16:55.960] Let's have somebody to talk to. [01:16:55.960 --> 01:17:00.960] We'll be right back. [01:17:00.960 --> 01:17:05.400] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [01:17:05.400 --> 01:17:06.400] Word? [01:17:06.400 --> 01:17:11.520] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. central time for scripture [01:17:11.520 --> 01:17:17.920] talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.920 --> 01:17:22.440] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly [01:17:22.440 --> 01:17:24.840] dividing the word of truth. [01:17:24.840 --> 01:17:28.800] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the book of Mark where we'll go verse [01:17:28.800 --> 01:17:32.160] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [01:17:32.160 --> 01:17:36.800] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [01:17:36.800 --> 01:17:39.160] and Christian character development. [01:17:39.160 --> 01:17:43.680] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.680 --> 01:17:48.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:50.240] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:17:50.240 --> 01:17:56.680] So tune into scripture talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire [01:17:56.680 --> 01:18:00.720] and motivate your studies of the scriptures. [01:18:00.720 --> 01:18:05.720] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:18:05.720 --> 01:18:09.480] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras Proven Method. [01:18:09.480 --> 01:18:13.840] Michael Mirras has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [01:18:13.840 --> 01:18:14.840] can win too. [01:18:14.840 --> 01:18:19.640] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:18:19.640 --> 01:18:21.320] civil rights statutes. [01:18:21.320 --> 01:18:24.960] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? [01:18:24.960 --> 01:18:27.000] How to answer letters and phone calls? [01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.600] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? [01:18:29.600 --> 01:18:34.240] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? [01:18:34.240 --> 01:18:39.040] The Michael Mirras Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:18:39.040 --> 01:18:41.520] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:18:41.520 --> 01:18:47.040] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner [01:18:47.040 --> 01:18:50.040] or email michaelmirras@yahoo.com. [01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:57.760] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. [01:18:57.760 --> 01:19:25.440] To learn how to stop debt collectors now, as I walk through the valley of the shadow [01:19:25.440 --> 01:19:30.680] of the sun, I take a look at my life and realize it's not a step, because I've been blasting [01:19:30.680 --> 01:19:37.000] and laughing so low and bad, even my mama thinks that my mind is gonna fly. [01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:38.000] Alright folks, we are back. [01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:39.000] This is rule of law radio. [01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:43.000] The call in number 512-646-1984 gives a call. [01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:44.000] Get in line. [01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:45.000] Let's have some conversation. [01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:47.000] Meanwhile, let's give back to Reina. [01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:50.000] Alright, Reina, please continue. [01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:55.360] Okay, well that's pretty much what I had. [01:19:55.360 --> 01:19:58.720] You know, I get conflicting stories depending on who I ask. [01:19:58.720 --> 01:20:04.200] Some people say that the oath of office doesn't matter, even if they don't have it. [01:20:04.200 --> 01:20:05.200] You know, you're... [01:20:05.200 --> 01:20:09.200] Well, if your state constitution says they cannot assume their official duties until [01:20:09.200 --> 01:20:15.840] it's filed, then whoever's making that statement is a moron, especially if they're a public [01:20:15.840 --> 01:20:21.400] official. [01:20:21.400 --> 01:20:26.280] If the state law says the same thing, whoever's making that statement is a moron, especially [01:20:26.280 --> 01:20:29.080] if they're a public official. [01:20:29.080 --> 01:20:34.320] But what you've got to have is that information in your hands to prove you don't know what [01:20:34.320 --> 01:20:36.280] the hell you're talking about. [01:20:36.280 --> 01:20:37.280] Yeah. [01:20:37.280 --> 01:20:43.520] So right here it says in Utah, state officers are required by both the federal and state [01:20:43.520 --> 01:20:46.000] constitutions to take an oath of office. [01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:47.240] The Constitution of the United States. [01:20:47.240 --> 01:20:51.760] The caveat there is it specifically says state officers. [01:20:51.760 --> 01:20:52.760] Okay. [01:20:52.760 --> 01:20:53.760] Alright. [01:20:53.760 --> 01:20:54.760] So that's... [01:20:54.760 --> 01:21:01.240] See, here in Texas it simply says any elected or appointed official. [01:21:01.240 --> 01:21:07.800] Okay. [01:21:07.800 --> 01:21:09.280] So if the... [01:21:09.280 --> 01:21:16.040] It does further say that all executive and judicial officers of the states could be bound [01:21:16.040 --> 01:21:21.400] by oath or affirmation to support the federal constitution. [01:21:21.400 --> 01:21:24.720] And the Constitution of the state of Utah? [01:21:24.720 --> 01:21:29.320] Utah specifies the wording of the oath to be taken by all officers made effective or [01:21:29.320 --> 01:21:32.800] appointed by this Constitution or by the laws made. [01:21:32.800 --> 01:21:33.800] Yes. [01:21:33.800 --> 01:21:38.920] Now what you have to do is find case law in Utah that specifically says that clause of [01:21:38.920 --> 01:21:42.800] the Constitution applies to local officials. [01:21:42.800 --> 01:21:48.400] You get a binding court case from your state that says it applies to local officials. [01:21:48.400 --> 01:21:54.320] And now you've got evidence that the lack of that oath disqualifies these individuals [01:21:54.320 --> 01:21:56.800] from performing the acts they perform. [01:21:56.800 --> 01:22:01.000] So they would be acting out of scope, right? [01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:03.960] They have no scope without that oath. [01:22:03.960 --> 01:22:07.040] There are moron pretending to be a cop. [01:22:07.040 --> 01:22:10.800] They're basically just citizens like you and I. [01:22:10.800 --> 01:22:11.800] No. [01:22:11.800 --> 01:22:12.800] No. [01:22:12.800 --> 01:22:18.000] They're criminals, not citizens. [01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:20.280] I love it. [01:22:20.280 --> 01:22:25.640] If they're acting without lawful authority to act, that's called impersonating a peace [01:22:25.640 --> 01:22:27.760] officer. [01:22:27.760 --> 01:22:33.400] That's a crime in every state of the union. [01:22:33.400 --> 01:22:39.040] If they have facilitated an arrest with no lawful authority to do so, they have committed [01:22:39.040 --> 01:22:43.000] aggravated assault and aggravated kidnapping. [01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:50.120] God knows how many times since the day they got employed. [01:22:50.120 --> 01:22:53.280] Look up the elements of aggravated assault and aggravated kidnapping. [01:22:53.280 --> 01:22:58.840] I guarantee you they met every single one of them. [01:22:58.840 --> 01:23:02.480] That's what that lack of oath of office actually means. [01:23:02.480 --> 01:23:11.960] If you get case law for Utah that says that applies to local officials. [01:23:11.960 --> 01:23:17.320] If you can find one that says it specifically applies to county and municipal police officers [01:23:17.320 --> 01:23:20.360] and deputies, even better. [01:23:20.360 --> 01:23:21.360] Right. [01:23:21.360 --> 01:23:22.360] Okay. [01:23:22.360 --> 01:23:23.360] Perfect. [01:23:23.360 --> 01:23:24.760] All right. [01:23:24.760 --> 01:23:32.120] What about as far as the dog and his paperwork being expired, just file that as part of motion [01:23:32.120 --> 01:23:33.120] to this. [01:23:33.120 --> 01:23:36.800] Is that any different than the cop not having an oath of office? [01:23:36.800 --> 01:23:43.660] If he's not a certified drug dog, why is he being used in the capacity of a certified [01:23:43.660 --> 01:23:44.920] drug dog? [01:23:44.920 --> 01:23:48.880] The dog is being used to impersonate a police canine. [01:23:48.880 --> 01:23:51.440] Oh, I love it. [01:23:51.440 --> 01:23:57.120] That's fraud by the sheriff's department. [01:23:57.120 --> 01:24:02.280] Do I go after the sheriff's department for fraud or the handler of the canine? [01:24:02.280 --> 01:24:08.600] Get evidence of this applying and that it doesn't actually exist and that that certification [01:24:08.600 --> 01:24:10.800] was actually expired at the time. [01:24:10.800 --> 01:24:17.960] Then you have all of the elements to sue the whole damn department, not just the officers [01:24:17.960 --> 01:24:23.040] because the department could have known and should have known these officers had no oath [01:24:23.040 --> 01:24:24.040] of office. [01:24:24.040 --> 01:24:29.040] If they were using an uncertified dog in a league, in a capacity, it was not authorized [01:24:29.040 --> 01:24:35.760] to be used in to perpetrate arrests that they had no legitimate authority to make based upon [01:24:35.760 --> 01:24:39.920] a dog that's not qualified to make it. [01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:42.920] Nice. [01:24:42.920 --> 01:24:45.880] And these guys are the strike force around here. [01:24:45.880 --> 01:24:50.800] Of course they are, which means they think they can do whatever they want. [01:24:50.800 --> 01:24:52.000] They do. [01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:53.000] They're very arrogant. [01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:54.680] They're more arrogant. [01:24:54.680 --> 01:24:59.520] That is every drug interdiction team in every police department and sheriff's department [01:24:59.520 --> 01:25:07.000] in this entire country, if not the world. [01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:08.400] Oh, I just, I love it. [01:25:08.400 --> 01:25:10.680] I just love the information that you've given me. [01:25:10.680 --> 01:25:11.680] So. [01:25:11.680 --> 01:25:17.400] Well, again, if there are any attorneys listening, criminal or otherwise that would like to call [01:25:17.400 --> 01:25:22.400] in and point out the error of my statements, please feel free to do so. [01:25:22.400 --> 01:25:30.120] But logically, constitutionally, morally and ethically, you will never ever prove I'm incorrect. [01:25:30.120 --> 01:25:31.120] You can't. [01:25:31.120 --> 01:25:32.120] It's impossible. [01:25:32.120 --> 01:25:33.120] Right. [01:25:33.120 --> 01:25:36.240] Now, the law may give them a special pass. [01:25:36.240 --> 01:25:40.120] That doesn't make the law right and it doesn't make their actions right. [01:25:40.120 --> 01:25:41.120] Right. [01:25:41.120 --> 01:25:46.720] Well, if I threatened to take it public in the newspaper, just, you know. [01:25:46.720 --> 01:25:47.720] No, no, no. [01:25:47.720 --> 01:25:48.920] Stop, stop, stop. [01:25:48.920 --> 01:25:56.160] Never ever use the word threaten about the things we're talking about and never ever [01:25:56.160 --> 01:26:00.040] give them advance notice that you're going to do it. [01:26:00.040 --> 01:26:06.560] Once you have all of the facts and you can prove that those facts are true, then you [01:26:06.560 --> 01:26:14.640] simply go to the local media and give them a pre-packaged gift wrap story that they can [01:26:14.640 --> 01:26:20.120] then go through and verify everything themselves and jump on it that much quicker because you've [01:26:20.120 --> 01:26:23.320] given them a springboard to start with. [01:26:23.320 --> 01:26:28.920] But don't ever tell anybody that you're going to be using this against that you're going [01:26:28.920 --> 01:26:33.440] to use it because what does that look like you're attempting to do? [01:26:33.440 --> 01:26:40.760] Bride or threaten or or influence of the outcome of an investigation or the behavior [01:26:40.760 --> 01:26:42.360] of a public official. [01:26:42.360 --> 01:26:48.280] In other words, it reflects and can seriously damage you personally. [01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:49.280] Right. [01:26:49.280 --> 01:26:51.280] So, don't do it. [01:26:51.280 --> 01:26:52.280] Just go do it. [01:26:52.280 --> 01:26:54.800] Retaliate either, right? [01:26:54.800 --> 01:26:55.800] And so. [01:26:55.800 --> 01:26:56.800] Say again. [01:26:56.800 --> 01:27:02.200] They're not supposed to retaliate either if I do go to that extreme, correct? [01:27:02.200 --> 01:27:07.040] Sure, they're not supposed to, but before you do it, make damn sure you understand it's [01:27:07.040 --> 01:27:09.040] still 100% possible. [01:27:09.040 --> 01:27:10.040] Right. [01:27:10.040 --> 01:27:14.320] Remember, these are people that think they're immune to consequences and they're the only [01:27:14.320 --> 01:27:18.520] ones that get to decide what those consequences are. [01:27:18.520 --> 01:27:21.040] And they're above the law in their mind. [01:27:21.040 --> 01:27:22.040] Yes. [01:27:22.040 --> 01:27:23.040] Yeah. [01:27:23.040 --> 01:27:26.040] Oh, this is exciting. [01:27:26.040 --> 01:27:30.880] I'm telling you if there's a completely different feel when you're the defendant and then all [01:27:30.880 --> 01:27:34.760] of a sudden you do just a little bit of work, you put in a little bit of effort and you [01:27:34.760 --> 01:27:39.000] find out just the minor things like this or they appear, they seem minor, but they're [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:40.840] really not. [01:27:40.840 --> 01:27:46.240] And the way that you carry yourself in the courtroom or, you know, it's pretty funny. [01:27:46.240 --> 01:27:51.080] I've done a couple of bar grievances and some FOIA requests and these guys are completely [01:27:51.080 --> 01:27:53.520] afraid of me at this point. [01:27:53.520 --> 01:27:55.200] It's really kind of funny to. [01:27:55.200 --> 01:27:57.400] It's empowering, isn't it? [01:27:57.400 --> 01:27:58.640] It is very much so. [01:27:58.640 --> 01:27:59.640] Yeah. [01:27:59.640 --> 01:28:03.080] Just like Randy said, this could get to be a lot of fun. [01:28:03.080 --> 01:28:04.080] It can be. [01:28:04.080 --> 01:28:10.320] As long as you understand, yes, it's a serious thing, but at the same time, nobody will fight [01:28:10.320 --> 01:28:12.300] harder for you than you will. [01:28:12.300 --> 01:28:16.360] You just have to understand how to fight. [01:28:16.360 --> 01:28:23.080] And there, there is very, very few people I've ever met in my life or know about in [01:28:23.080 --> 01:28:30.880] history that were natural born fighters, physical or otherwise, as far as they just knew how [01:28:30.880 --> 01:28:38.120] without any training, without anything beyond just, it just came to them out of the blue. [01:28:38.120 --> 01:28:40.720] Well, this is absolutely no different. [01:28:40.720 --> 01:28:45.240] This is not the kind of fighting that just comes to you out of the blue. [01:28:45.240 --> 01:28:46.240] It takes time. [01:28:46.240 --> 01:28:47.240] It takes experience. [01:28:47.240 --> 01:28:52.880] It takes knowledge and information and a strategy on how to use all that combined to [01:28:52.880 --> 01:28:55.680] make something with it. [01:28:55.680 --> 01:28:57.360] Lawyers are trained to do it. [01:28:57.360 --> 01:29:01.520] We have to figure it out for ourselves, but it's not as hard as they would like you to [01:29:01.520 --> 01:29:03.520] believe it is. [01:29:03.520 --> 01:29:04.520] Right. [01:29:04.520 --> 01:29:09.840] But just as the satisfaction of knowing that they are going to feel the exact way that [01:29:09.840 --> 01:29:15.720] me and my brother did that night when they did their whole bracket, you know, their whole [01:29:15.720 --> 01:29:21.800] scripted little thing that they did to us that night and the fear and the worry and [01:29:21.800 --> 01:29:26.680] the panic and, and everything, it just is really gratifying to know that they're going [01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:28.440] to feel the same way. [01:29:28.440 --> 01:29:29.840] It's entirely possible. [01:29:29.840 --> 01:29:33.880] If you can, if you get the court to do its job, it's entirely possible. [01:29:33.880 --> 01:29:36.000] You get a grand jury to do their job. [01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:38.000] It's entirely possible. [01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:39.480] Yeah. [01:29:39.480 --> 01:29:45.960] Especially considering the consensus of how people feel about cops. [01:29:45.960 --> 01:29:48.040] Especially when they're informed the cop is dirty. [01:29:48.040 --> 01:29:52.920] Hang on just a second, Raina, let me finish this break and we'll get right this up for [01:29:52.920 --> 01:29:53.920] you. [01:29:53.920 --> 01:29:54.920] Okay. [01:29:54.920 --> 01:29:56.920] I'm going to call you 646-1984. [01:29:56.920 --> 01:29:57.920] This is my last caller. [01:29:57.920 --> 01:29:58.920] I need to talk to somebody. [01:29:58.920 --> 01:29:59.920] Give me a call. [01:29:59.920 --> 01:30:04.560] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number [01:30:04.560 --> 01:30:05.560] and date of birth. [01:30:05.560 --> 01:30:08.360] But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. [01:30:08.360 --> 01:30:12.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment. [01:30:12.280 --> 01:30:16.880] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive [01:30:16.880 --> 01:30:19.520] database of your personal information. [01:30:19.520 --> 01:30:20.520] That's creepy. [01:30:20.520 --> 01:30:22.520] But it doesn't have to be that way. [01:30:22.520 --> 01:30:25.640] StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine. [01:30:25.640 --> 01:30:30.400] StartPage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking [01:30:30.400 --> 01:30:32.480] cookies, and they're third party certified. [01:30:32.480 --> 01:30:36.960] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with StartPage. [01:30:36.960 --> 01:30:39.560] Great search results and total privacy. [01:30:39.560 --> 01:30:43.080] StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:30:43.080 --> 01:30:45.320] Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere. [01:30:45.320 --> 01:30:48.880] But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give [01:30:48.880 --> 01:30:49.880] it. [01:30:49.880 --> 01:30:54.800] I make spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually [01:30:54.800 --> 01:30:56.600] nobody notices or cares. [01:30:56.600 --> 01:31:01.160] I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory [01:31:01.160 --> 01:31:05.480] for employment or a government requirement, and I won't give my phone number to a company [01:31:05.480 --> 01:31:09.640] or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare. [01:31:09.640 --> 01:31:14.760] To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests. [01:31:14.760 --> 01:31:16.400] It's like exercising a muscle. [01:31:16.400 --> 01:31:18.200] It gets easier the more you do it. [01:31:18.200 --> 01:31:20.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:31.520] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:32.520] I lost my son. [01:31:32.520 --> 01:31:33.520] My nephew. [01:31:33.520 --> 01:31:34.520] My uncle. [01:31:34.520 --> 01:31:35.520] My son. [01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:36.520] On September 11, 2001. [01:31:36.520 --> 01:31:39.760] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [01:31:39.760 --> 01:31:43.920] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:47.760] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7. [01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:52.560] Over 1,200 architects and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there is more [01:31:52.560 --> 01:31:53.560] to the story. [01:31:53.560 --> 01:31:54.960] Bring justice to my son. [01:31:54.960 --> 01:31:55.960] My uncle. [01:31:55.960 --> 01:31:56.960] My nephew. [01:31:56.960 --> 01:31:57.960] My son. [01:31:57.960 --> 01:31:58.960] Go to buildingwhat.org. [01:31:58.960 --> 01:31:59.960] Why it fell. [01:31:59.960 --> 01:32:00.960] Why it matters. [01:32:00.960 --> 01:32:01.960] And what you can do. [01:32:01.960 --> 01:32:05.960] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. [01:32:05.960 --> 01:32:09.600] In today's America, we live in a us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever [01:32:09.600 --> 01:32:13.680] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.680 --> 01:32:16.760] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to [01:32:16.760 --> 01:32:21.000] act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:24.880] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [01:32:24.880 --> 01:32:26.760] our rights through due process. [01:32:26.760 --> 01:32:30.240] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [01:32:30.240 --> 01:32:34.000] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:36.400] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.400 --> 01:32:40.400] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:32:40.400 --> 01:32:41.760] ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:45.040] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [01:32:45.040 --> 01:32:49.480] The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [01:32:49.480 --> 01:32:51.800] documents and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.800 --> 01:32:55.760] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.760 --> 01:33:04.760] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:04.760 --> 01:33:33.760] You're listening to The Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:34.760 --> 01:33:45.600] Alright, we are back, this is Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie [01:33:45.600 --> 01:33:46.600] Craig. [01:33:46.600 --> 01:33:49.160] It is March 6th, 2023. [01:33:49.160 --> 01:33:53.560] We are live tonight and we are currently talking with Raina in Utah. [01:33:53.560 --> 01:34:01.880] Okay, Raina, you, as I was saying, these cops and these attorneys and these judges all look [01:34:01.880 --> 01:34:08.000] at you like, what makes you think that you can understand what this is and what it means [01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:10.440] and everything you're trying to make an argument about here? [01:34:10.440 --> 01:34:12.880] They think they're the only ones that can do this. [01:34:12.880 --> 01:34:16.440] Do you remember the movie Blue Thunder with Roy Shiter? [01:34:16.440 --> 01:34:19.880] Can't say that I do. [01:34:19.880 --> 01:34:22.600] It's the big military helicopter that he's flying. [01:34:22.600 --> 01:34:30.040] It's kind of a movie version of Airwolf kind of deal, but Roy Shiter's playing an LA cop [01:34:30.040 --> 01:34:36.880] that is put on a project where this secret military group is trying to use this military [01:34:36.880 --> 01:34:37.880] helicopter. [01:34:37.880 --> 01:34:45.320] They're trying to make, build up its reputation so they can sell it for domestic use to municipalities [01:34:45.320 --> 01:34:51.080] as a police helicopter when in fact it's a truly heavily armed military helicopter. [01:34:51.080 --> 01:34:57.480] So they're starting problems in the city to try to make the use of this helicopter acceptable, [01:34:57.480 --> 01:34:59.480] so to speak. [01:34:59.480 --> 01:35:12.080] So in one part of the movie, let's see, McDowell, I forget, yeah, anyway, he's playing a bad [01:35:12.080 --> 01:35:17.160] guy in this and he's asking Roy Shiter if he thinks he can actually fly this big military [01:35:17.160 --> 01:35:21.000] helicopter and Roy Shiter just goes, well you flew it, didn't you, because they knew [01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:25.440] each other from when they flew together in Vietnam during the war. [01:35:25.440 --> 01:35:28.800] So they don't like each other and so on and so forth. [01:35:28.800 --> 01:35:33.400] But the fact that McDowell's character was challenging him is that do you really think [01:35:33.400 --> 01:35:40.480] that you can fly this and he just shot or just shot back, well you flew it, didn't you. [01:35:40.480 --> 01:35:43.920] That's the approach I have when it comes to an attorney telling me I don't know what I'm [01:35:43.920 --> 01:35:46.720] talking about and that I'm misunderstanding something. [01:35:46.720 --> 01:35:51.720] I said, wait a minute, you're telling me that I misunderstand it when I'm the one who's [01:35:51.720 --> 01:35:54.000] actually read it and researched it. [01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:57.040] How much reading and research of it have you actually done? [01:35:57.040 --> 01:35:58.520] Well I read the court opinion. [01:35:58.520 --> 01:36:00.400] The court didn't do the research. [01:36:00.400 --> 01:36:05.320] I guarantee you the court didn't do the research because the opinion you're talking about only [01:36:05.320 --> 01:36:11.560] addressed this one specific thing and did not look at all this other cornucopia of related [01:36:11.560 --> 01:36:17.720] statutes and information that shows the court got it completely wrong. [01:36:17.720 --> 01:36:20.880] And you're going to tell me I don't know what I'm doing. [01:36:20.880 --> 01:36:26.800] You're going to ask me, do I really think I can make this fly? [01:36:26.800 --> 01:36:32.200] That's the whole reason I'm on this show is to try to empower people to learn how to do [01:36:32.200 --> 01:36:37.160] this so they can stand on their own two feet and beat these people black and blue with their [01:36:37.160 --> 01:36:42.160] own rule book. [01:36:42.160 --> 01:36:45.080] And so hopefully that's something you're getting out of this show. [01:36:45.080 --> 01:36:48.320] Oh hang on, she's muted and she's not supposed to be. [01:36:48.320 --> 01:36:49.320] Go ahead, I'm sorry. [01:36:49.320 --> 01:36:53.640] That's okay, I actually dropped off for a second there on Acti. [01:36:53.640 --> 01:36:54.640] Oh okay, alright. [01:36:54.640 --> 01:37:00.160] No, I would love nothing more than to take these guys to task because I hate deception [01:37:00.160 --> 01:37:06.400] at the level that they are doing it. [01:37:06.400 --> 01:37:12.800] Yeah, and they are, they know that what they're doing is wrong. [01:37:12.800 --> 01:37:14.320] They simply do not care. [01:37:14.320 --> 01:37:19.920] The rule of law does not apply to them in their eyes and in their minds. [01:37:19.920 --> 01:37:28.680] And the problem is our system has now become one great huge criminal enterprise operating [01:37:28.680 --> 01:37:31.440] under the guise of legitimate authority. [01:37:31.440 --> 01:37:38.080] And there is no worse kind of criminal organization to have, believe me, than one that holds the [01:37:38.080 --> 01:37:42.400] power to make itself appear to be legitimate. [01:37:42.400 --> 01:37:43.400] Right. [01:37:43.400 --> 01:37:51.200] Well, and everyone that I know thinks that I'm crazy for doing this to them when I'm [01:37:51.200 --> 01:37:58.920] the one that got in trouble and I just thought, that's what's wrong with the system, is... [01:37:58.920 --> 01:38:00.440] That's exactly what's wrong with the system. [01:38:00.440 --> 01:38:04.440] They have to pose a line and I said, I'm not going to be a sheeple. [01:38:04.440 --> 01:38:07.120] I'm not going to be a follower like everybody else. [01:38:07.120 --> 01:38:11.720] They violated my rights and I have rights and I'm going to stand up for them. [01:38:11.720 --> 01:38:17.240] And the worst thing that they can do is make me do some classes for a year or something [01:38:17.240 --> 01:38:18.240] like that. [01:38:18.240 --> 01:38:19.240] Big deal. [01:38:19.240 --> 01:38:20.240] If I lose, I lose. [01:38:20.240 --> 01:38:21.240] So what? [01:38:21.240 --> 01:38:29.440] Well, now, keep in mind that depending upon how big a threat you become to their interest, [01:38:29.440 --> 01:38:31.680] that may or may not be true. [01:38:31.680 --> 01:38:37.760] They could come back and try to do something that will make matters a lot worse for you. [01:38:37.760 --> 01:38:42.400] Never count that out when you're talking about people with this kind of power. [01:38:42.400 --> 01:38:44.320] Never count that out. [01:38:44.320 --> 01:38:46.320] Right. [01:38:46.320 --> 01:38:50.560] I kind of encourage it because I like to do that dance with them because I know I'm not [01:38:50.560 --> 01:38:51.560] a follower. [01:38:51.560 --> 01:38:55.640] Well, be real careful because you're encouraging the wrong kind of people to follow up on something [01:38:55.640 --> 01:39:00.840] that most of them are all too willing to follow up on and have far too many people willing [01:39:00.840 --> 01:39:03.000] to help them follow up on it. [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:04.000] Yeah. [01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:09.800] So if you have a vast network, that's for sure, of people to help them with the deceit. [01:39:09.800 --> 01:39:13.400] So anything you do, I'm not saying don't do it. [01:39:13.400 --> 01:39:20.280] I'm just saying be fully prepared and fully capable of covering your backside for every [01:39:20.280 --> 01:39:26.160] single thing that happens so that it is that much harder for them to get away with pulling [01:39:26.160 --> 01:39:28.080] something like that. [01:39:28.080 --> 01:39:29.280] Absolutely. [01:39:29.280 --> 01:39:35.840] And I know that if everything shakes out the way I hope it does, that I'll have a target [01:39:35.840 --> 01:39:37.120] on my back. [01:39:37.120 --> 01:39:46.360] And so, yeah, I will have to operate and not give them a reason for anything. [01:39:46.360 --> 01:39:50.920] Even though they'll still try, you know, they'll create a reason, but if I don't give them [01:39:50.920 --> 01:39:56.280] reason, then I'm in that much better of a position. [01:39:56.280 --> 01:39:57.280] You're right. [01:39:57.280 --> 01:40:01.960] And do what I've said for many years on this show, never again leave your house without [01:40:01.960 --> 01:40:04.640] something that audio and video records. [01:40:04.640 --> 01:40:06.040] Right. [01:40:06.040 --> 01:40:11.080] And anytime you even so much as see a cop in the vicinity, have that recording running [01:40:11.080 --> 01:40:12.880] and ready to go as a just in case. [01:40:12.880 --> 01:40:15.680] You can always delete it if it turned out to be nothing. [01:40:15.680 --> 01:40:19.920] But if something happens in short order and it's not recording, you may never get the [01:40:19.920 --> 01:40:22.400] opportunity to turn it on. [01:40:22.400 --> 01:40:23.400] Right. [01:40:23.400 --> 01:40:29.840] Well, you know, and they love to publicize just anything about, you know, anything that [01:40:29.840 --> 01:40:36.560] you do as quote unquote criminals, you know, they post your mug shots, they put them on [01:40:36.560 --> 01:40:40.600] Facebook, they put them in the paper, they put them everywhere, you know, and if you [01:40:40.600 --> 01:40:47.120] Google my name right now, it already says, shows that I have this criminal record now. [01:40:47.120 --> 01:40:52.720] And I haven't even been convicted of anything yet, but you're innocent until proven guilty. [01:40:52.720 --> 01:40:57.000] You know, they like to just mirror your name through mud nonstop. [01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:01.840] But the second that, you know, the tables turn and you do it to them, they will retaliate. [01:41:01.840 --> 01:41:02.840] I know they will. [01:41:02.840 --> 01:41:08.120] There's no way that guys that are that cocky and arrogant won't. [01:41:08.120 --> 01:41:10.840] But I'm not afraid of it. [01:41:10.840 --> 01:41:14.760] Well, good luck to you. [01:41:14.760 --> 01:41:15.880] Hey, thanks. [01:41:15.880 --> 01:41:18.440] I appreciate it. [01:41:18.440 --> 01:41:22.960] And if I have a victory, I will call back and let you know. [01:41:22.960 --> 01:41:23.960] All right. [01:41:23.960 --> 01:41:24.960] Well, please do. [01:41:24.960 --> 01:41:25.960] Okay. [01:41:25.960 --> 01:41:26.960] Thanks. [01:41:26.960 --> 01:41:27.960] Yes, ma'am. [01:41:27.960 --> 01:41:28.960] All right. [01:41:28.960 --> 01:41:31.120] Well, she was my last caller. [01:41:31.120 --> 01:41:36.880] If anybody else is out there, 512-646-1984 is the call in number, give us a call. [01:41:36.880 --> 01:41:41.320] And I've got a little over 20 minutes left in the show. [01:41:41.320 --> 01:41:44.160] Well, a little less than 20 minutes, actually. [01:41:44.160 --> 01:41:48.600] But still, there are things we've got time to talk about if you call. [01:41:48.600 --> 01:41:52.080] But in the meantime, I'm going to go back to the other stuff I was talking about at [01:41:52.080 --> 01:41:54.000] the beginning of the show. [01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:01.960] So, and that's dealing with the lack of evidence for everything that's going on in these criminal [01:42:01.960 --> 01:42:03.920] traffic courts. [01:42:03.920 --> 01:42:11.600] But remember that the cop is the one testifying against you and he's testifying based upon [01:42:11.600 --> 01:42:15.640] his perception and opinion of the facts. [01:42:15.640 --> 01:42:18.640] He's not doing it based upon actual evidence. [01:42:18.640 --> 01:42:24.040] See, he is taking what he thinks he knows about the statute. [01:42:24.040 --> 01:42:29.320] He's comparing it to what he thinks he saw and that he's drawing a conclusion about [01:42:29.320 --> 01:42:34.840] the legality of those two things combined. [01:42:34.840 --> 01:42:41.640] But he is not qualified to make that conclusion. [01:42:41.640 --> 01:42:47.600] He can allege that you did it, but he can't get on the stand and testify to the fact that [01:42:47.600 --> 01:42:55.440] you did it because he does not have the capability and the qualifications to make that determination [01:42:55.440 --> 01:42:56.880] of law. [01:42:56.880 --> 01:43:01.040] That's a legal conclusion beyond his ability to make. [01:43:01.040 --> 01:43:08.200] Now, he can say, I believe this is true, but where's the evidence that they have to present [01:43:08.200 --> 01:43:10.080] to support it? [01:43:10.080 --> 01:43:19.760] His belief is nothing without the evidence and they don't ever have it. [01:43:19.760 --> 01:43:24.840] To prove a motor vehicle, they would have to prove that the automobile in question meets [01:43:24.840 --> 01:43:27.880] all the statutory criteria of a motor vehicle. [01:43:27.880 --> 01:43:28.880] It's registered. [01:43:28.880 --> 01:43:30.720] It's insured. [01:43:30.720 --> 01:43:35.920] It was being driven for the purpose of whatever the single subject matter clause is, which [01:43:35.920 --> 01:43:43.000] in this particular case is transportation, and that the person behind the wheel was a [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:46.200] driver of such a motor vehicle. [01:43:46.200 --> 01:43:49.040] They have to prove all of those things. [01:43:49.040 --> 01:43:55.320] They have to have documents that show it was insured, it was registered, it was inspected, [01:43:55.320 --> 01:44:00.480] and it was registered for use as a motor vehicle. [01:44:00.480 --> 01:44:05.120] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:44:05.120 --> 01:44:06.520] of nutrition. [01:44:06.520 --> 01:44:11.280] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:44:11.280 --> 01:44:16.920] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:44:16.920 --> 01:44:22.360] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young [01:44:22.360 --> 01:44:25.760] Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:25.760 --> 01:44:31.560] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:44:31.560 --> 01:44:36.800] We have come to trust Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [01:44:36.800 --> 01:44:40.000] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:45.960] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:44:45.960 --> 01:44:47.560] quality radio. [01:44:47.560 --> 01:44:51.880] As you realize the benefits of Youngjevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:51.880 --> 01:44:57.160] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:44:57.160 --> 01:44:59.040] increase your income. [01:44:59.040 --> 01:45:01.040] Order now. [01:45:01.040 --> 01:45:04.240] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.240 --> 01:45:10.960] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [01:45:10.960 --> 01:45:14.960] that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:14.960 --> 01:45:18.760] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:18.760 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:27.880] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [01:45:27.880 --> 01:45:34.440] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [01:45:34.440 --> 01:45:39.080] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:39.080 --> 01:45:43.440] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.440 --> 01:45:49.560] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.560 --> 01:45:52.240] prosa tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.240 --> 01:45:56.320] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. [01:45:56.320 --> 01:46:21.600] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:21.600 --> 01:46:28.480] We are back, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig, [01:46:28.480 --> 01:46:32.160] we are now in the last segment of the show for tonight, I don't have any callers up [01:46:32.160 --> 01:46:37.520] on the board at the moment, so I'm going to finish up this discussion on my own. [01:46:37.520 --> 01:46:47.760] Now because they don't have any actual evidence to support the legal conclusions of this officer, [01:46:47.760 --> 01:46:57.280] why, how can they allow this to be the basis of a conviction? [01:46:57.280 --> 01:47:05.720] Well, legally speaking, they can't, but they don't care about the legality of it. [01:47:05.720 --> 01:47:09.760] If they did, there wouldn't be two different sets of rules, okay? [01:47:09.760 --> 01:47:11.360] And there are two different sets of rules. [01:47:11.360 --> 01:47:16.600] For instance, as I said, the rules of evidence come into play here, but do you know that [01:47:16.600 --> 01:47:23.760] the Texas Supreme Court has a specific rule of evidence, now it doesn't say anything about [01:47:23.760 --> 01:47:30.120] it applying to municipal courts, but there is a specific rule of evidence that exempts [01:47:30.120 --> 01:47:38.080] justice of the peace courts from having to provide evidence in the, in the manners required [01:47:38.080 --> 01:47:39.680] by the rules of evidence. [01:47:39.680 --> 01:47:44.280] In other words, the rules of evidence do not apply at all in a, in a judicial court. [01:47:44.280 --> 01:47:47.080] And here's exactly what the rule is and what it says. [01:47:47.080 --> 01:47:56.000] Rule 101, and it's titled, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules, Definitions. [01:47:56.000 --> 01:48:03.040] And under subsection F, it has exception for justice courts. [01:48:03.040 --> 01:48:12.240] And it specifically says, these rules do not apply to justice court cases except as authorized [01:48:12.240 --> 01:48:16.560] by Texas rule of civil procedure 500.3. [01:48:16.560 --> 01:48:18.600] Now think about that. [01:48:18.600 --> 01:48:25.120] Since justice of the peace courts have criminal jurisdiction over Class C fine only offenses, [01:48:25.120 --> 01:48:32.800] just as municipal courts do, they are saying that in a justice court, the rules of evidence [01:48:32.800 --> 01:48:35.560] do not have to be followed. [01:48:35.560 --> 01:48:41.920] That means they can use hearsay evidence, they can use legal conclusions made by a witness [01:48:41.920 --> 01:48:45.840] that's not qualified to make them. [01:48:45.840 --> 01:48:52.280] That means that they don't have to have any evidentiary support for anything a witness [01:48:52.280 --> 01:48:56.080] gets up there to testify to. [01:48:56.080 --> 01:49:02.200] Because the judge is free to accept or reject anything that's offered by either side any [01:49:02.200 --> 01:49:10.880] damn time and way they want to, because they're not bound by the rules of evidence. [01:49:10.880 --> 01:49:15.880] That's a double standard on criminal justice. [01:49:15.880 --> 01:49:24.880] All because one is used to steal money from the general population in huge quantities. [01:49:24.880 --> 01:49:29.520] And they get away with it under the premise that since it doesn't require imprisonment [01:49:29.520 --> 01:49:34.520] as a part of the punishment, we can do it differently. [01:49:34.520 --> 01:49:38.640] I don't see that in the Texas constitution anywhere. [01:49:38.640 --> 01:49:43.080] I know that the state and federal constitution have equal application and protection of the [01:49:43.080 --> 01:49:50.640] laws clauses, i.e. everyone must be treated the same under the same circumstances. [01:49:50.640 --> 01:49:56.160] Well, if you're charging me with a crime and the criminal rules apply, then you don't get [01:49:56.160 --> 01:50:02.960] to make exceptions for the criminal rules relative to a certain type of offense or offenses [01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:07.120] or based upon a particular court that's being done in. [01:50:07.120 --> 01:50:11.240] Because if you're doing that, then you're changing the rules for one class of people [01:50:11.240 --> 01:50:17.200] versus those of another class of people. [01:50:17.200 --> 01:50:27.680] It's not fair, it's not right, it's not constitutional, and yet it is exactly what they're doing. [01:50:27.680 --> 01:50:32.800] And we are letting them get away with it. [01:50:32.800 --> 01:50:38.160] Our juries are comprised of ignorant sheeple that don't know any better and don't want [01:50:38.160 --> 01:50:42.960] to be there and could care less about justice being done because they don't even know what [01:50:42.960 --> 01:50:45.800] the hell justice even is. [01:50:45.800 --> 01:50:50.280] They just know that the person over there is accused by some cop of doing something. [01:50:50.280 --> 01:50:54.200] The cop got up on the stand, raised their hand and said they accused them and that they were [01:50:54.200 --> 01:50:56.280] doing these things. [01:50:56.280 --> 01:51:01.080] And that because the judge and the prosecutor allowed the answers to go forward and all [01:51:01.080 --> 01:51:08.200] that, then all the dots must be, all the eyes must be dotted and all the T's must be crossed. [01:51:08.200 --> 01:51:12.320] Everything must be right with the world and thus we're going to go ahead and rule according [01:51:12.320 --> 01:51:19.200] to what we've been allowed to see when the fact of the matter is the case was rigged [01:51:19.200 --> 01:51:23.120] from the get-go. [01:51:23.120 --> 01:51:30.080] Because the defendant was not presumed innocent, the defendant was not confronted by any actual [01:51:30.080 --> 01:51:36.920] evidence, the defendant was not confronted by a witness with personal firsthand knowledge [01:51:36.920 --> 01:51:44.720] of the facts and the witness was prosecuted based entirely upon statements and legal conclusions [01:51:44.720 --> 01:51:50.920] made by a witness that was not qualified to make them or to testify to their veracity [01:51:50.920 --> 01:51:54.000] in the first place. [01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:59.960] And yet the judge and the prosecutor are working hand in hand to ensure that that outcome [01:51:59.960 --> 01:52:08.280] that preconceived outcome of guilty is achieved. [01:52:08.280 --> 01:52:11.080] And the jury is none the wiser. [01:52:11.080 --> 01:52:15.480] The general population is none the wiser. [01:52:15.480 --> 01:52:26.360] This just goes on and on and on in utter perpetuity and has for decades. [01:52:26.360 --> 01:52:31.680] This is the problem with not knowing your rights, not knowing your constitution and [01:52:31.680 --> 01:52:38.160] not knowing the laws of the state you live in, especially those that deal with the required [01:52:38.160 --> 01:52:43.400] procedures in a given set of circumstances and types of case. [01:52:43.400 --> 01:52:47.840] You have to know the rules and when the rules aren't being followed you have to be able [01:52:47.840 --> 01:52:54.280] to point out how and why they're not and how and who is not following them. [01:52:54.280 --> 01:52:57.960] So why is always left up to interpretation? [01:52:57.960 --> 01:53:03.760] And they can always lie about the why, but what they cannot do is lie about the violation [01:53:03.760 --> 01:53:12.000] when the facts of the violation are clearly evident. [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:20.080] We have got to become better educated on these things. [01:53:20.080 --> 01:53:26.040] That's the whole reason for this show's existence because I got tired of people getting railroaded [01:53:26.040 --> 01:53:31.680] by a system that could care less that they were doing it to either innocent or plainly [01:53:31.680 --> 01:53:34.520] ignorant people. [01:53:34.520 --> 01:53:39.000] They don't care. [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:46.240] So the only way we fix it is to make them care. [01:53:46.240 --> 01:53:54.960] Now as of right now, we don't have a multitude of ways to accomplish that, unfortunately. [01:53:54.960 --> 01:53:58.480] For example, we can't fire the judge directly. [01:53:58.480 --> 01:54:03.120] We can petition to have the judge fire, but that doesn't mean anybody will do it. [01:54:03.120 --> 01:54:06.320] Remember they have a very good track record of protecting their own. [01:54:06.320 --> 01:54:10.880] Judges in every state of the union do some really egregious crap and they're allowed [01:54:10.880 --> 01:54:16.600] to remain on the bench and act as a judge when they should literally be in jail for [01:54:16.600 --> 01:54:23.120] the things they did and they should never, ever be allowed to hold a public office again [01:54:23.120 --> 01:54:28.760] and will power over anyone when they're willing to abuse their office and their power in such [01:54:28.760 --> 01:54:36.480] a capacity in the first place and yet they're still there. [01:54:36.480 --> 01:54:46.440] I mean, the Chief Justice of our Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to take a phone [01:54:46.440 --> 01:55:01.960] call on a death sentence case because the phone call came in after regular business hours. [01:55:01.960 --> 01:55:11.080] Now this was a death sentence case and the guy was executed, but the Chief Justice of [01:55:11.080 --> 01:55:17.520] the Court of Criminal Appeals refused to act on the phone call they received because it [01:55:17.520 --> 01:55:25.760] was outside of normal office hours for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [01:55:25.760 --> 01:55:37.120] That ladies and gentlemen is a level of arrogance and immorality in a public official that I [01:55:37.120 --> 01:55:44.120] have never seen surpassed to this day with the possible exception of Abraham Lincoln [01:55:44.120 --> 01:55:58.360] in the war on Northern Aggression, okay? They do not care until it hits them personally. [01:55:58.360 --> 01:56:05.400] So we've got to change things so that it can hit them personally. [01:56:05.400 --> 01:56:12.600] We need to be taking away immunity from any and every public official regardless of their [01:56:12.600 --> 01:56:16.100] office, regardless of what they do. [01:56:16.100 --> 01:56:24.600] If their action a, violates the rights of an individual, b, violates the state or federal [01:56:24.600 --> 01:56:35.000] laws in how it was done or what was done, or if they violate their oath of office to [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:42.160] the Constitution and uphold the rights of the people and the laws of the state or federal [01:56:42.160 --> 01:56:47.200] area in which they work, they shouldn't be allowed to be judges. [01:56:47.200 --> 01:56:52.160] They shouldn't be allowed to hold public office anywhere of any kind ever for the rest of [01:56:52.160 --> 01:56:54.160] their lives. [01:56:54.160 --> 01:57:00.080] If they violate any of those things, they're not trustworthy. [01:57:00.080 --> 01:57:09.560] Why would you give an untrustworthy person power over you, your property, and your life? [01:57:09.560 --> 01:57:17.080] Why would a reasonable person with all of their cognitive abilities ever choose willingly [01:57:17.080 --> 01:57:18.720] to do that? [01:57:18.720 --> 01:57:22.680] Well, the answer is they wouldn't. [01:57:22.680 --> 01:57:28.440] So the powers that be, including these judges and your legislators that are also part and [01:57:28.440 --> 01:57:38.480] parcel of the same little union of bar attorneys, have given such power to themselves without [01:57:38.480 --> 01:57:45.000] our approval, without our consent, they have given it to themselves. [01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:46.000] We need to take it away. [01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:53.800] We need to organize, we need to learn, we need to educate, and we need to take action [01:57:53.800 --> 01:57:58.920] to get the laws and the Constitution fixed in such a way as to take this power out of [01:57:58.920 --> 01:57:59.920] their hands forever. [01:57:59.920 --> 01:58:03.600] All right, folks, that's the end of our show for tonight. [01:58:03.600 --> 01:58:05.720] I want to thank all the callers who called in. [01:58:05.720 --> 01:58:10.680] I want to thank all the listeners who are out there paying attention, and most of all, [01:58:10.680 --> 01:58:11.680] thanks for having me back. [01:58:11.680 --> 01:58:14.920] I'm sorry I was gone for so long and so often. [01:58:14.920 --> 01:58:18.240] Things haven't worked out the way I'd hoped in that regard, but they're getting better. [01:58:18.240 --> 01:58:21.040] So now that things have, I'm back to stake. [01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:23.400] All right, folks, y'all have a great week. [01:58:23.400 --> 01:58:50.520] Have a great week, good night, and God bless. [01:58:50.520 --> 01:58:56.560] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.560 --> 01:58:57.760] Recovery Version. [01:58:57.760 --> 01:59:02.760] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.760 --> 01:59:08.400] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.400 --> 01:59:11.720] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.720 --> 01:59:20.680] Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.680 --> 01:59:26.200] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus [01:59:26.200 --> 01:59:30.240] charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.240 --> 01:59:32.760] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.760 --> 01:59:41.160] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.160 --> 01:59:51.320] Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.320 --> 01:59:52.960] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.960 --> 01:59:53.960] You found it. [01:59:53.960 --> 02:00:11.720] LogosRadioNetwork.com.