[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, brand crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $25.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.840 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.360]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade,
[00:57.360 --> 01:00.240]  killing 10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:04.480 --> 01:10.240]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp into taxes law
[01:10.240 --> 01:14.880]  back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio,
[01:14.880 --> 01:18.720]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[01:18.720 --> 01:23.040]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test
[01:23.040 --> 01:28.240]  the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month
[01:28.240 --> 01:33.440]  that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.440 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.800]  that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:42.800 --> 01:48.000]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.400]  as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kaima Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.400 --> 01:59.600]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution
[01:59.600 --> 02:05.040]  of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball,
[02:05.040 --> 02:09.760]  an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that quote, the law is constantly
[02:09.760 --> 02:14.160]  changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if
[02:14.160 --> 02:18.080]  someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[02:22.480 --> 02:27.600]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As the
[02:27.600 --> 02:32.720]  first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark
[02:32.720 --> 02:38.400]  ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific
[02:38.400 --> 02:43.520]  Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland
[02:43.520 --> 02:50.400]  near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:13.520 --> 03:22.800]  When every sunroof comes for you, tell me what you sure want to do, what you're gonna do,
[03:25.440 --> 03:32.400]  yeah. Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you.
[03:32.400 --> 03:38.080]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you.
[03:38.080 --> 03:44.160]  When you were eight and you had that tree, you go to school and learn to go and then lose. So why
[03:44.160 --> 03:50.960]  are you acting like a fluffy fool if you get high and you're just cool. Bad boys, bad boys, what you're
[03:50.960 --> 03:58.080]  gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you. Bad boys, bad boys. Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy
[03:58.080 --> 04:07.920]  Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio on this Friday. The, the, what was it, Brett? Come on,
[04:07.920 --> 04:13.440]  yesterday was the 16th. We talked about this. Okay, okay. All you have to do is add one. Add one,
[04:13.440 --> 04:23.440]  okay. It is the 17th day of December 2021, our Friday in four hour info marathon and I have
[04:23.440 --> 04:28.560]  already turned the phones on, lines on. See, Brett thinks I'm getting senile.
[04:30.640 --> 04:35.120]  And maybe I am. Did I, did I say that or did you just imagine it? I don't remember.
[04:38.160 --> 04:41.840]  I've been taking this stuff for, for to improve my memory.
[04:43.760 --> 04:51.680]  Which one was it? I forgot. Okay. If you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[04:51.680 --> 05:03.760]  512-646-1984 and I'll try not to, to teeter too far off the center. Something I didn't talk about
[05:03.760 --> 05:12.080]  last night that I do want to start out with today. You know, we talk about, this is a show about
[05:12.080 --> 05:20.720]  law and we talk about how we are creatures of statute. And while we are creatures of statute,
[05:22.560 --> 05:29.040]  I'm an old guy and I'm not naive anymore. I'm not no, so naive that I think the law
[05:29.840 --> 05:40.640]  is automatic. That it functions automatically and it, it just jumps up there and protects and preserves
[05:40.640 --> 05:46.800]  all my rights for me. That's a really good distinction. It's not automatic. It doesn't
[05:46.800 --> 05:52.880]  happen by itself. That's a really good distinction. I think a lot of people imagine that for a long
[05:52.880 --> 05:58.160]  time until they find out that it really hurts when it didn't happen that way. Yeah, and then when it
[05:58.160 --> 06:05.680]  doesn't happen that way, they feel betrayed. Exactly. And I can tell you from experience
[06:05.680 --> 06:17.520]  the absolute worst thing that can happen to us is betrayal. It dramatically affects our whole
[06:18.800 --> 06:28.080]  position in the universe. We're busy in a complex world and we're focused on the place that we're
[06:28.080 --> 06:35.440]  at and the things that we're doing. All the other issues that are around us, the tiger that might
[06:35.440 --> 06:44.960]  try to attack us, that broke out of a wildlife refuge, the drunk that's about to run us over,
[06:44.960 --> 06:51.120]  all these other things that could happen, we have to have some kind of expectation
[06:51.920 --> 06:58.560]  that there are other members of the society that we live in that will protect us from those.
[06:58.560 --> 07:06.480]  Those issues and problems that could occur so we could focus on what we're doing. And a primary
[07:07.680 --> 07:16.880]  issue that we expect is that the law will be upheld, that the law will protect us and preserve our
[07:16.880 --> 07:24.080]  inalienable rights. And we hear all these people saying, I have all these inalienable rights.
[07:24.080 --> 07:33.920]  Good luck with that, Bubba. They are not automatically inalienable. They're only inalienable
[07:34.880 --> 07:42.480]  if you are belligerent enough to make darn well sure they are inalienable. They have to
[07:42.480 --> 07:49.680]  be defended or else it's just as like you don't have it. Exactly. Rights belong to the belligerent
[07:49.680 --> 08:01.840]  litigant. And I'm working on that. I have, okay, the law is there and we are creatures of statute
[08:01.840 --> 08:08.400]  and we follow the law scrupulously. But we understand that the law is not automatic. It's not
[08:08.400 --> 08:16.400]  going to just jump out there and enforce itself. We have to do that. But then we get all these
[08:16.400 --> 08:20.720]  people saying, well, I went down and I filed criminal charges and they didn't do nothing.
[08:21.920 --> 08:31.760]  And they feel horribly betrayed because these public officials that we have employed
[08:32.960 --> 08:38.480]  for the purpose of protecting our rights didn't do it.
[08:38.480 --> 08:50.640]  And we feel emasculated. How do I say that, Brett? Not emasculated but unemasculated. Oh,
[08:50.640 --> 09:00.560]  well. We feel betrayed. We feel helpless. Nobody's protecting us. I was in the military and I always
[09:00.560 --> 09:09.120]  felt like I had people at my back. I never understood these guys who would go out in the bush all
[09:09.120 --> 09:19.280]  on their own. No backup. That is really, really tough. And then us, when our public officials
[09:19.280 --> 09:25.440]  don't do what we expect them to, that's how we feel. We're out in the bush and we don't have any cover.
[09:25.440 --> 09:31.360]  And that gives us a hint as to how we need to adjust their perception as well,
[09:32.000 --> 09:35.920]  because they feel invincible if they feel like everybody's behind them.
[09:37.440 --> 09:41.200]  You would have thought that I had set that up for Brett to say that,
[09:42.480 --> 09:50.240]  but I didn't. That's exactly where I was going. Everything's political.
[09:50.240 --> 09:58.800]  The laws are out there, but it's politics that enacts and enforces them. Everything's always
[09:58.800 --> 10:03.600]  political. So we have prosecuting attorneys now who are pretty well doing whatever they want to.
[10:05.520 --> 10:10.720]  You can file all the criminal complaints you want to and the prosecutor will decide whether or not
[10:11.600 --> 10:16.400]  he feels like it's in his political best interest to pursue your complaints. If he doesn't,
[10:16.400 --> 10:24.560]  well, heck with you. So how do we fix that, guys? How do we turn politics to our favor?
[10:24.560 --> 10:33.520]  Well, T. and Co. Brook filed some complaints with Brett's help with Travis County District Attorney,
[10:34.400 --> 10:40.480]  and he decided that it was not politically convenient for him to pursue those complaints.
[10:40.480 --> 10:50.480]  So he made the determination that he did not have jurisdiction. Well, I've raised the question of,
[10:51.840 --> 11:00.800]  where the heck did you get authority to make that ruling? You're just a prosecutor. Prosecutors
[11:00.800 --> 11:08.800]  are required to prosecute, not make judicial determinations a probable cause or jurisdiction.
[11:08.800 --> 11:23.440]  Jurisdiction is not a bar to prosecution. A trial judge does not have to dismiss a case
[11:23.440 --> 11:32.080]  for lack of prosecution to esponte. Jurisdiction, lack of jurisdiction, is an affirmative defense
[11:32.080 --> 11:40.320]  that must be raised. If you don't raise it, the court is going to assume that it has jurisdiction.
[11:42.240 --> 11:49.920]  That's how it works in the real world. It's not self-activating. You have to activate it.
[11:50.640 --> 11:58.720]  So what I've been doing is working the politics. How do we put the prosecutor in a political position
[11:58.720 --> 12:05.680]  such that it's more politically expedient for him to take these public officials
[12:06.400 --> 12:12.480]  and lead them to their own devices? When I file a complaint against a public official,
[12:12.480 --> 12:18.000]  I expect my, or anyone, if I file a criminal complaint with prosecutor attorney,
[12:18.000 --> 12:30.320]  I expect him to do precisely what the law commands him to do. I really don't care whether he thinks
[12:30.320 --> 12:36.320]  he has jurisdiction or not. I don't care if he thinks that a complaint that I filed
[12:37.440 --> 12:46.480]  is politically expedient, not his job. The legislature is state of Texas and most other
[12:46.480 --> 12:57.600]  states went to great lengths to ensure that prosecuting attorneys did not have the power
[12:57.600 --> 13:07.840]  to take over prosecutions. Prosecutors hate grand juries. They say, I'm the prosecutor. I'm the
[13:07.840 --> 13:14.080]  guy who's going to have to bring this to court. I'm the one who should be able to determine
[13:14.080 --> 13:19.520]  whether or not I have the facts and law I need to prosecute this case.
[13:21.200 --> 13:27.360]  And our founders understood that. They understood that prosecutors felt that way.
[13:28.880 --> 13:34.560]  But they also understood the problem was allowing prosecutors to have that power.
[13:34.560 --> 13:47.120]  And they said, absolutely not. 203, 4, 5, and 6, duties of prosecutors.
[13:49.520 --> 13:54.240]  Nothing in there says, oh, you can make a determination of probable cause.
[13:56.080 --> 14:01.040]  You can make a determination of whether or not you have jurisdiction. It's not in there anywhere.
[14:01.040 --> 14:10.640]  He's public official. He may only do what the law specifically authorizes him to do. And our
[14:10.640 --> 14:21.760]  legislature created a system of magistrates and grand juries for the singular specific purpose
[14:21.760 --> 14:31.200]  of reining in prosecuting attorneys, preventing prosecuting attorneys from making determinations
[14:31.200 --> 14:41.600]  of probable cause. It's right there in the code. So we're letting prosecutors make these decisions
[14:41.600 --> 14:50.080]  that our founders understood the horrible potential consequences. If you let prosecutors make these
[14:50.080 --> 15:00.320]  determinations, it will lead to the precise disaster we experienced today. We don't have
[15:00.320 --> 15:07.760]  to guess what will happen. We're looking at it. So I'm softening up the prosecutor. It's all
[15:07.760 --> 15:13.200]  politics at the end of the day. And that's the point I'm trying to make. It's politics. You get
[15:13.200 --> 15:22.800]  law enforced politically, not statutorily. So how do we push the prosecutor into a position
[15:23.760 --> 15:31.600]  to where he finds it more politically expedient to give complaints to grand juries, whether
[15:31.600 --> 15:43.360]  it's making determinations of jurisdiction or probable cause? Got a good way to do that. You
[15:43.360 --> 15:47.760]  file criminal charges against him when he doesn't give a set of complaints to the grand jury.
[15:49.520 --> 15:58.880]  Or a misdemeanor if he refuses to prosecute. Oh, you collected your check and you went home
[15:58.880 --> 16:04.320]  and spent it any way you wanted to. We didn't tell you what you had to do with your money.
[16:05.040 --> 16:14.320]  We gave it to you. You accepted it. That bound you. We don't care whether you want to do something
[16:14.320 --> 16:19.680]  or not. If you don't do it, then you fail to perform a duty you required to perform. And in
[16:19.680 --> 16:26.720]  the process, denied the complaintant in the due course of the law of state detections,
[16:26.720 --> 16:31.440]  that's a class A misdemeanor in the state. And we should file it with the grand jury and that's
[16:31.440 --> 16:39.680]  exactly what I did. And set him up, played him like a cheat fiddle, and he took debate. And when
[16:39.680 --> 16:46.240]  we come back on the other side, I'll explain the steps I'm taking to make it very politically
[16:46.240 --> 16:57.040]  inexperienced for the prosecutor. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Google Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[17:16.640 --> 17:22.160]  English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by
[17:22.160 --> 17:27.440]  phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors
[17:27.440 --> 17:32.480]  out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[17:32.480 --> 17:38.320]  to go away? The Michael Mearest proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.320 --> 17:43.520]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit rule of law radio
[17:43.520 --> 17:49.120]  dot com and click on the blue Michael Mearest banner or email Michael Mearest at yahoo.com.
[17:49.120 --> 17:58.160]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop
[17:58.160 --> 18:04.720]  debt collectors next. Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In
[18:04.720 --> 18:08.400]  today's America, we live in a us against them society and if we the people are ever going to
[18:08.400 --> 18:12.640]  have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[18:12.640 --> 18:16.080]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private
[18:16.080 --> 18:20.400]  capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Trap the courts afford us the
[18:20.400 --> 18:24.960]  least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[18:24.960 --> 18:28.960]  Former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most
[18:28.960 --> 18:33.040]  comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how
[18:33.040 --> 18:36.960]  to hold your courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this valuable material by
[18:36.960 --> 18:41.520]  going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy
[18:41.520 --> 18:45.520]  of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie, video and audio of the
[18:45.520 --> 18:50.080]  original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.080 --> 18:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.000 --> 19:12.480]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.000 --> 19:43.040]  We're standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep dark
[19:43.040 --> 19:53.280]  hole. I'm always on the lookout for something that suits my soul. So I sit back and I watch the
[19:53.280 --> 20:02.800]  evidence unfold and I see justice. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[20:02.800 --> 20:16.960]  rule of law radio. And on this Friday, December 17, 2021. And I'm talking about politics.
[20:18.640 --> 20:26.400]  Take your local prosecutor and set him up. I set him up. Well, actually Tina and Brett set him up.
[20:26.400 --> 20:32.320]  And then when he decided not to prosecute, I filed criminal charges against him
[20:33.280 --> 20:38.720]  with the grand jury. But I filed it with him because the only address we have for grand
[20:38.720 --> 20:43.280]  jury is the prosecuting attorney's office. And I gave him this folder and I said,
[20:44.080 --> 20:50.720]  this is for the grand jury only. Do not open it. Tell your boss, do not open it. It's a trap.
[20:50.720 --> 21:01.440]  You probably won't believe this, but he opened it. Such a surprise. And he found criminal
[21:01.440 --> 21:07.760]  complaints against himself, accusing him of secreting criminal complaints from the grand jury.
[21:08.960 --> 21:11.360]  So what do you think he did with the complaints against himself?
[21:12.880 --> 21:19.120]  Well, secreted them too. So I made up a set of criminal complaints,
[21:19.120 --> 21:26.880]  including a brief showing that a prosecuting attorney had zero prosecutural discretion by statute
[21:28.080 --> 21:37.920]  and filed it with every district judge in Travis County and requested that of each
[21:37.920 --> 21:42.080]  district judge that they petition the head administrative judge of the district for a
[21:42.080 --> 21:52.080]  court of inquiry and issue a warrant for the arrest of the prosecuting attorney. So Brett,
[21:52.080 --> 21:59.360]  how many of those judges whose duty as a magistrate I invoked, do you believe will
[22:00.960 --> 22:09.280]  issue warrants against the prosecuting attorney? Well, they wouldn't just abdicate their duties
[22:09.280 --> 22:16.560]  of office, would they? No, you're right, they would. They don't think they have to bother.
[22:18.160 --> 22:21.760]  I filed a criminal complaint against the governor with Chief Justice of the Supreme,
[22:21.760 --> 22:27.120]  and he didn't bother. Then I filed a criminal complaint against the Chief Justice of the
[22:27.120 --> 22:31.520]  Supreme with the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals, and she didn't bother.
[22:33.200 --> 22:36.320]  So there's a good chance these district judges won't bother.
[22:36.320 --> 22:43.280]  Then I go after the district judges. This is running the routine on them, guys.
[22:44.080 --> 22:48.800]  You don't run the routine on them so that you can get them indicted.
[22:50.080 --> 22:55.600]  Oh, if I got them indicted, that would be an extra benefit, but it's not necessary.
[22:55.600 --> 23:05.360]  That's not my purpose. My purpose is to hold them to the strict letter of the law.
[23:06.720 --> 23:10.640]  Now, if these complaints were given to a grand jury and a grand jury no-build,
[23:12.560 --> 23:19.280]  I'm done. I did my part. I did that to the court of criminal appeals in 2008,
[23:19.280 --> 23:24.960]  got them all presented to a grand jury, and that's what taught me about politics.
[23:26.560 --> 23:31.200]  I didn't get them presented to a grand jury because of all the pressure I put on them,
[23:31.840 --> 23:39.600]  all of my eloquent oratory. I got them presented to the grand jury because the 25-year democratic
[23:39.600 --> 23:46.480]  prosecuting attorney was retiring. All of the judges at the court of criminal appeals were
[23:46.480 --> 23:54.560]  Republicans. He used my complaint as cannon fodder to try to take out his political rivals
[23:55.120 --> 24:01.360]  with him when he retired. It's not about law. It's all about politics.
[24:02.560 --> 24:08.720]  We just use the law as kind of a set of rules to structure the game.
[24:08.720 --> 24:16.560]  So, I'm playing their political game. I'm putting every district judge in Travis County
[24:16.560 --> 24:24.880]  in a position such that they're subject to indictment by a grand jury because they refuse
[24:24.880 --> 24:31.120]  to perform their duty and issue a warrant against the prosecutes of district attorney
[24:31.120 --> 24:40.640]  the way they are absolutely commanded to do by statute. Now, they slithered up behind that
[24:40.640 --> 24:49.680]  thin blue line, and they protected their fellow democratic prosecutor. I think if you listen
[24:49.680 --> 24:56.080]  to the show all the time, you know I'm not particularly anti-democratic. I tend not to be
[24:56.080 --> 25:01.680]  political. It's not about politics. It's not about, for me, it's not about politics. It's about
[25:01.680 --> 25:06.960]  rule of law. But in order to get to rule of law, we sometimes have to use the politics.
[25:08.480 --> 25:15.360]  So, they've all got their snouts in the same trough. Now, I'm going to have every district
[25:15.360 --> 25:22.320]  judge in Travis County with criminal charges against them for shielding the district attorney
[25:22.320 --> 25:30.800]  from prosecution. Now, the likelihood of me actually getting them indicted is not very high,
[25:32.080 --> 25:34.960]  but who here would like to play Russian roulette?
[25:37.680 --> 25:41.760]  My prosecuting attorney in Wise County, I went into his office one day, and he was sitting
[25:41.760 --> 25:47.520]  with his head in his hand, looking all full-on, and I said, well, Greg, what's the matter?
[25:47.520 --> 25:56.480]  And he looked up at me with this sad look on his face, and he said, those darn grand jurors,
[25:57.360 --> 26:04.080]  you never know what they're going to do. And I held up both hands, looked up at the ceiling,
[26:04.080 --> 26:14.800]  and said, there is a God. I could not have heard anything better. The prosecuting attorney
[26:14.800 --> 26:25.920]  is telling me that he can't control the grand jury. Exactly. The grand jury is the genius of our
[26:25.920 --> 26:34.960]  founders. You never know what 12 or 23 people, the feds got 23 people on the grand jury.
[26:36.400 --> 26:44.080]  You never know what they're going to do. You can try, you can do a little dance and try to handle
[26:44.080 --> 26:54.880]  them. There was a program on not long ago about a guy who specialized in analyzing juries,
[26:56.160 --> 27:01.440]  but at the end of the day, you never know what 12 people are going to do.
[27:03.760 --> 27:08.400]  So I filed criminal complaints against the prosecuting attorney. What if this,
[27:08.400 --> 27:15.120]  Jack Legg gets me in front of a grand jury? What if one of those grand jurors happened
[27:15.120 --> 27:27.280]  not to like me? That's all it takes. It's one grand jury member to stand up and take a different
[27:27.280 --> 27:32.960]  position. And what if one of those grand jury members is just upset with the system?
[27:32.960 --> 27:42.960]  Or Pia, because they prosecuted his granddaughter. He's thrown in jail all night and the prosecutor
[27:42.960 --> 27:49.840]  screwed him over. You never know. Who wants to take that risk with their career?
[27:51.840 --> 27:58.000]  Guys, this is how we control the system. Only you and I can do this.
[27:58.000 --> 28:06.320]  You can go directly to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas and file criminal charges
[28:06.320 --> 28:12.480]  with him in his capacity as a magistrate. And if he doesn't issue a warrant, you can file criminal
[28:12.480 --> 28:22.160]  charges against him and sue him personally. We can do this. I filed a criminal complaint
[28:22.160 --> 28:29.520]  against the governor. I mean, who the heck am I? Just some low-level redneck chump in
[28:29.520 --> 28:40.880]  Hillbilly, Texas. One person in 29 million. And he rescinded all his executive orders.
[28:41.920 --> 28:48.320]  You can do that. I don't have any power or authority you don't have.
[28:48.320 --> 28:58.720]  The hardest part of all of this is getting someone to step up and write their name on a criminal
[28:58.720 --> 29:11.920]  complaint that first time. We have this internal, I like to think, irrational fear that if we file
[29:11.920 --> 29:18.640]  criminal complaints, oh, wow, you can get in a lot of trouble. In point of fact, no, you can't.
[29:20.640 --> 29:25.920]  When I file criminal complaints, if one of these people with guns on their hips simply frowns at me,
[29:26.640 --> 29:33.760]  I call 911 on them. I become a protected class. You become a protected class. I filed against the
[29:33.760 --> 29:41.840]  governor. Nobody talked to me. Nobody threatened me. Nobody told me how to get in trouble.
[29:41.840 --> 29:49.360]  They got as far away from me as they possibly could. Because I became kryptonite. Randy
[29:49.360 --> 29:55.040]  Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue Law Radio. When we come back, we'll go to our callers. We'll be right back.
[30:02.160 --> 30:06.080]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:06.080 --> 30:10.800]  affected our health? I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings
[30:10.800 --> 30:17.520]  about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. Privacy is under attack. When you give
[30:17.520 --> 30:22.320]  up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:22.320 --> 30:28.240]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance
[30:28.240 --> 30:34.000]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[30:34.000 --> 30:39.280]  announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:39.280 --> 30:47.680]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with start page. Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. It's a fact.
[30:47.680 --> 30:51.520]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head
[30:51.520 --> 30:56.320]  has been disputed. Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed
[30:56.320 --> 31:01.120]  concerns. Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell
[31:01.120 --> 31:06.720]  phones affect brain chemistry. A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in
[31:06.720 --> 31:11.520]  the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:11.520 --> 31:16.640]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances. I
[31:16.640 --> 31:21.840]  always keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.840 --> 31:24.640]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:24.640 --> 31:36.240]  I lost my son. My nephew. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2004. Most people don't know that
[31:36.240 --> 31:42.480]  a third tower fell on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a
[31:42.480 --> 31:48.640]  plane. I will be official explanation is that fire brought down building 7. Over 1200 architects
[31:48.640 --> 31:53.040]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story. Bring justice
[31:53.040 --> 31:59.200]  to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org. Why it fell. Why it matters.
[31:59.200 --> 32:05.600]  And what you can do. Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:05.600 --> 32:11.840]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[32:11.840 --> 32:17.920]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your
[32:17.920 --> 32:23.760]  good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light and be a
[32:23.760 --> 32:29.440]  blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible
[32:29.440 --> 32:35.600]  studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works. Our verse by
[32:35.600 --> 32:41.120]  verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[32:41.120 --> 32:46.800]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian
[32:46.800 --> 32:53.200]  character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[32:53.200 --> 32:59.360]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the
[32:59.360 --> 33:17.040]  Scriptures. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:59.360 --> 34:12.320]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rooted Law Radio and we're going to go to our
[34:12.320 --> 34:17.840]  callers. I have finished my sermon. That was the Gospel According to Randy.
[34:19.760 --> 34:26.640]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Okay, Jeff in South Carolina, what do you have for us
[34:26.640 --> 34:33.120]  today? Good evening Randy and Brett. Glad to hear you guys online there.
[34:35.360 --> 34:40.080]  Question and I'm kind of blending it. I might corrupt the actual
[34:41.200 --> 34:45.600]  genuineness of the question because of that but I'm blending it with city and county,
[34:45.600 --> 34:53.600]  municipal and county agencies. We know that state legislation can only make the law.
[34:53.600 --> 35:03.360]  The county and the city, they'll make ordinances or regulations but according to like with Eddie and
[35:03.360 --> 35:11.120]  you folks, I've heard explanations very well on this house. They can't make a law that governs the
[35:11.120 --> 35:20.960]  general public. But one thing, I know Eddie wrote that and he researched it but I'm the one that
[35:20.960 --> 35:27.280]  gave it to you so give me credit, not Eddie. Okay, okay, I see. It was only Eddie. Forget I
[35:27.280 --> 35:35.680]  didn't mention Eddie. Whoever that guy is. Yeah, who is that guy? Eddie Craig is really good
[35:36.560 --> 35:46.400]  at doing really sophisticated and detailed research. Eddie didn't realize how powerful
[35:46.400 --> 35:56.080]  the ruling I got because of that pleading was. When you get the Court of Appeals to take five
[35:56.080 --> 36:03.920]  months to go find a reason to dismiss your case other than what you asked them to dismiss it for,
[36:05.920 --> 36:13.280]  you know that they got a problem with it. They should not play poker. They went to great links
[36:13.280 --> 36:20.240]  to avoid this particular argument. Okay, I don't want to sound like I'm digging up Eddie.
[36:21.520 --> 36:23.680]  He might hear that and that'll give him the big head.
[36:26.560 --> 36:36.080]  Okay, but my question goes to city, in some cases like city inspectors, municipal inspectors that
[36:36.080 --> 36:43.040]  are not law enforcement agents. They haven't been trained or certified and of course in many cases
[36:43.040 --> 36:49.440]  county employees have not been. So I'm not including the county sheriff of course or deputy
[36:49.440 --> 36:59.280]  sheriff. But where I'm kind of with the link, I can't quite find the link here is how I've heard
[36:59.280 --> 37:05.600]  you, you and or Eddie, I don't recall who, but I think you in particular said how they can adopt
[37:05.600 --> 37:19.360]  state statutes and enforce them. No, they can't. They like to think they can, but when they adopt
[37:19.360 --> 37:25.760]  those state statutes, they adopt them as ordinances. Yeah, so then they can enforce ordinances.
[37:28.640 --> 37:31.680]  They can only enforce ordinances. They become ordinances.
[37:31.680 --> 37:37.840]  But not on the general public again, right? Right, exactly. They're still ordinances.
[37:39.520 --> 37:46.720]  They don't stop being ordinances just because they are a representation of state law.
[37:49.040 --> 37:56.640]  The reason that's important is I was in Highland Park, Texas, where it was that day,
[37:56.640 --> 38:07.280]  and the officer accused me of speeding and I asked him, are you charging me with a violation
[38:07.280 --> 38:11.600]  under the Texas Transportation Code or as a city ordinance?
[38:13.680 --> 38:16.800]  And they got to dance it up and down. Do you remember that part, Brett?
[38:17.520 --> 38:22.080]  Yes, I thought that was very interesting that they, but he knew when it came down to it,
[38:22.080 --> 38:26.160]  you squeezed him and then it turned out that he actually knew it was only an ordinance. He was
[38:26.160 --> 38:33.280]  enforcing it because they couldn't enforce the trust. The police officer had no power to enforce
[38:33.280 --> 38:35.920]  the transportation code, so they called it an ordinance.
[38:38.560 --> 38:43.920]  They had adopted the ordinances of this state transportation code into their
[38:46.960 --> 38:54.720]  city ordinances, but I don't think they actually have in Highland Park. But the judge was doing
[38:54.720 --> 39:00.400]  a little song and dance trying to find a way not to lose space in this whole room full of people.
[39:03.600 --> 39:14.160]  So, oh well, so if they say it's an ordinance, good. If they say it's a statute, then
[39:16.880 --> 39:19.680]  the statute, they would have to bring the statute from
[39:19.680 --> 39:26.560]  the penal code, criminal procedure code, or one of the professional conduct codes.
[39:27.920 --> 39:39.120]  The legislature does not get into city and county local issues. Now, the legislature could have
[39:39.120 --> 39:49.520]  taken a set of model ordinances and passed them into state law, but they didn't do that.
[39:51.760 --> 40:00.720]  They certainly had the power to do that, but they didn't. Brett, do you have any reason, any idea why?
[40:00.720 --> 40:11.440]  I don't know why. I've thought about that. With the potential problem that they have,
[40:12.000 --> 40:15.760]  why didn't, you know, they did that with transportation code, they did that with
[40:15.760 --> 40:21.120]  the Code of Criminal Procedure and Penal Code, they took a model code and passed it into law.
[40:22.000 --> 40:27.680]  So, why don't you do that with ordinances? Just make them state law and problems over.
[40:27.680 --> 40:35.280]  But they didn't. Maybe it's because different communities have different sort of personalities,
[40:35.280 --> 40:43.200]  and some want to be really picky about not allowing neon on any signs, all the signs have
[40:43.200 --> 40:49.680]  to be brick, and so they make that city ordinances, and they can enforce things that are people that
[40:49.680 --> 40:53.840]  are in contract with the city, and they try to push through the envelope and try to enforce it on
[40:53.840 --> 41:01.840]  anybody they want to, but maybe it's because some other communities are sort of anti-rules.
[41:01.840 --> 41:06.640]  They don't want to have pressure and people telling them what to do, and so that's kind
[41:06.640 --> 41:12.000]  of the flavor of that community. I don't know. What I'm thinking, you know, it doesn't make sense.
[41:12.960 --> 41:21.840]  The state could pass, the legislature could pass those into law, and then the city could decide
[41:21.840 --> 41:28.320]  if it wanted to actually enforce certain of those laws. You know, that happens now. We've got laws
[41:28.320 --> 41:35.280]  on the books that aren't enforced. Okay. We've got speeding on the sidewalk. It's a crime in Texas.
[41:36.960 --> 41:43.440]  It's never enforced. I understand why I walked into the local convenience store a year or two ago,
[41:43.440 --> 41:49.440]  and this guy's sitting at a bench chewing tobacco and spitting between his legs, and there's a pile
[41:49.440 --> 41:57.040]  of spit a half-inch tall between his legs. If I was queasy at all, that wouldn't have been enough
[41:57.040 --> 42:02.960]  to make me vomit. So I understood why spitting on the sidewalk was a problem, but that was when
[42:02.960 --> 42:11.200]  people, a lot of people chewed tobacco and such, and it got pretty nasty, but they don't enforce it.
[42:12.320 --> 42:17.440]  There's a lot of them they don't enforce. So the legislature could have passed all these ordinances
[42:17.440 --> 42:23.680]  and just not enforce them, and then the city could decide which ones they wanted to enforce
[42:23.680 --> 42:34.480]  and which ones they didn't, and that's what the city can do. They can grant you more rights than
[42:34.480 --> 42:42.000]  the legislature, but they can't grant you less. The legislature can grant you more rights than
[42:42.000 --> 42:48.800]  the constitution, but not less. The state constitution can grant you more rights than
[42:48.800 --> 42:54.000]  the federal, but not less. So they could have done it. They just chose not to.
[42:55.360 --> 43:01.120]  But back to the point, the point is you want to bring a constitutional issue,
[43:02.560 --> 43:08.400]  something that will really jerk a knot in their shorts, and they're going to want to make that go away.
[43:08.400 --> 43:12.240]  Jeff, does that make sense?
[43:13.520 --> 43:20.320]  To a degree, but can you take two different applications? One would be, let's just say,
[43:20.320 --> 43:33.280]  the county tax collector, and the other would be a city with enforcing international building code,
[43:33.280 --> 43:42.160]  and the county would be, let's say, the tax collector taking state legislation and applying it to state...
[43:42.160 --> 43:47.520]  Okay, hold on. We're about to go to our sponsors, and I'll speak to the international building code.
[43:48.560 --> 43:54.560]  Most jurisdictions have adopted that into their own codes. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[43:54.560 --> 44:04.160]  Rural Law Radio, we'll be right back. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[44:04.160 --> 44:09.120]  except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[44:09.120 --> 44:14.960]  and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[44:14.960 --> 44:20.160]  environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[44:20.160 --> 44:26.960]  adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets
[44:26.960 --> 44:32.480]  many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[44:32.480 --> 44:39.760]  Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.760 --> 44:46.480]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, you're health will improve as you help support quality
[44:46.480 --> 44:52.800]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[44:52.800 --> 44:59.520]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[45:00.880 --> 45:05.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:05.760 --> 45:12.960]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24
[45:12.960 --> 45:19.600]  hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[45:19.600 --> 45:25.200]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[45:25.200 --> 45:32.240]  course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[45:32.240 --> 45:38.080]  case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.080 --> 45:44.000]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our
[45:44.000 --> 45:52.080]  audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.080 --> 46:10.080]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.800 --> 46:33.200]  Yeah, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry, I like to know just what
[46:33.200 --> 46:42.960]  I'm fishing for. I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no blood. I'm just here making my
[46:42.960 --> 46:53.280]  living pushing buttons. I get my message that I do anyone in the shout and distance. I hope for
[46:53.280 --> 46:59.440]  bravery, and I'm the guest slave which showing resistance. First I'm from...
[46:59.440 --> 47:05.360]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and before we go back to Jeff's,
[47:05.360 --> 47:12.560]  one thing I want to touch on. I used to be a contractor, and these building codes can
[47:12.560 --> 47:21.280]  sometimes get really onerous, but I learned pay attention to those building codes.
[47:22.640 --> 47:30.480]  They were not created faciously. When you put a piece of metal flexible conduit into a
[47:31.760 --> 47:37.200]  switchbox, there's a little plastic grommet you're required to put on the end of it.
[47:37.200 --> 47:43.440]  You don't want to first saw that. I thought, you got to be kidding me. I'm going to get
[47:43.440 --> 47:48.720]  shut down because I didn't put that little plastic grommet on there. The guy said, well,
[47:48.720 --> 47:54.800]  what happens is when you cut this conduit, the edges before you cut it sharp,
[47:55.760 --> 48:02.880]  and rodents and stuff moving in the walls over the years causes the conduit to move and
[48:02.880 --> 48:10.080]  scrape against the insulation of the wiring, and they've had a number of people killed in fires
[48:10.080 --> 48:16.880]  caused by this. This is something you don't see coming. Something that will cause you problems
[48:16.880 --> 48:24.800]  down the road that they've found cause problems, and they put in requirements to keep this from
[48:24.800 --> 48:33.760]  happening. When I'm building this place here, I've got time and money crunching in front of me,
[48:34.640 --> 48:42.720]  and I'm trying to get this thing done. I will tend to short circuit those minor issues
[48:42.720 --> 48:49.600]  unless somebody steps on my throat. I learned, and I had some good building inspectors
[48:49.600 --> 48:57.040]  that weren't just jackbooty thugs. They said, you put a hole through the wall for the vent
[48:57.040 --> 49:08.160]  for the hot water heater. It's not big enough. I got a 12-inch thick concrete wall with a half-inch
[49:08.160 --> 49:15.200]  hole in it, and I got to chase it with a three-quarter inch bit. That thing beat me up big time,
[49:15.200 --> 49:25.280]  but it was a problem they had had that caused the backup in the hot water heater that caused
[49:25.280 --> 49:33.440]  them to explode. Five, 10, 15 years down the road that I would never have known about,
[49:34.080 --> 49:39.520]  that I wouldn't have considered it worth the trouble, but when the inspector explained why
[49:39.520 --> 49:48.320]  they were doing it every time, it always made sense. With that said, okay, the building codes
[49:48.320 --> 49:52.400]  are really well-constructed, and they're a good idea. It's just a really good idea to follow
[49:52.400 --> 50:01.040]  them to the letter, but the city doesn't have the authority to enforce those against me if
[50:01.040 --> 50:08.880]  I'm not a contractor. When I was a contractor, they could because I had to enter into a contract
[50:08.880 --> 50:14.480]  with the city. When I got a building permit, I agreed to abide by all of these codes.
[50:16.000 --> 50:18.240]  If you're a homeowner, you haven't agreed to any of that stuff,
[50:19.840 --> 50:24.800]  and just because it's a good idea, just because it's well researched,
[50:25.920 --> 50:32.480]  that doesn't mean they have the authority to enforce it. Jeff, does that make sense?
[50:32.480 --> 50:39.120]  Yes, sir. That's the distinction we need to keep in place.
[50:40.480 --> 50:43.840]  What is your issue? What is going on here?
[50:45.440 --> 50:52.560]  In particular, I have been trying to look at county taxation, and they base that here in
[50:52.560 --> 51:04.160]  South Carolina on Title XII. There, the legislature established a county tax collector and gave them
[51:04.160 --> 51:11.680]  the rates they could tax and so on and so forth. I'm referring particularly to property tax, of
[51:11.680 --> 51:17.360]  course, but here again, we're in the same situation, or is it different?
[51:17.360 --> 51:27.520]  It's different. Tax is different than ordinances, but we're probably not the best one to talk to
[51:27.520 --> 51:35.840]  about that. Alphonse is the best one to talk to about that. If you will send me an email
[51:37.280 --> 51:44.000]  and ask for introduction to Alphonse, I will get you a link to his telegram site
[51:44.000 --> 51:52.800]  and send him, forward your email to him asking for an introduction. He is taking this issue on big
[51:52.800 --> 52:00.400]  time. I know that he's studied with Steve Emerson down in Florida.
[52:01.920 --> 52:04.000]  You don't need that link. You already know about it.
[52:05.680 --> 52:10.320]  I've listened to Steve Emerson repeatedly, the same thing over and over and listened to him,
[52:10.320 --> 52:16.720]  everything I could get a hold of, but the problem is with many of these different issues that I've
[52:16.720 --> 52:25.360]  looked at, what Steve Emerson quotes out of the Florida law does not exist in South Carolina law.
[52:25.360 --> 52:31.600]  I was in the same type of sections in South Carolina. I'm thinking this is it. This is what
[52:31.600 --> 52:39.600]  he's talking about, but the critical phrase or phraseology or definition is missing. It's not
[52:39.600 --> 52:53.120]  there. To me, I look at it and I'm looking at what he's claiming is there in Florida. I think
[52:53.120 --> 52:59.840]  we know Florida statute and find it. Or like some of yours with Texas, who's a magistrate?
[52:59.840 --> 53:05.600]  That's great, but in South Carolina, only the district magistrate is a magistrate. No one else
[53:05.600 --> 53:13.200]  is. I don't have the options of using a higher judge as a magistrate function. It's not available
[53:13.200 --> 53:19.280]  to me in South Carolina. Now I'm just expressing some frustrations, understand? But staying back
[53:19.280 --> 53:29.120]  on the topic, the property tax, these are not certified law enforcement. They are county entities,
[53:29.120 --> 53:35.600]  yet they exert authority over the individual and their private property. How can this be?
[53:37.600 --> 53:42.400]  They're not exerting criminal authority. This is all administrative.
[53:44.480 --> 53:48.080]  They're not coming out and arresting you. They'll try to steal your property.
[53:49.520 --> 53:54.960]  Have you read the entire tax code, property tax code?
[53:54.960 --> 54:01.600]  Well, which is title 12, which seems to be South Carolina's tax-enabling legislation. Absolutely,
[54:01.600 --> 54:07.920]  read it from the end. Twice. Probably more than that.
[54:08.800 --> 54:16.160]  Oh, okay. Then you're probably very familiar with all the nuances.
[54:16.160 --> 54:22.800]  You're stuck with the code that you're in. Pardon me?
[54:24.480 --> 54:30.480]  You're stuck with the code that you're in, but there is the politics.
[54:32.480 --> 54:39.040]  They're trying to collect taxes from you. How do they get you onto their tax rolls?
[54:39.040 --> 54:46.800]  Well, it's triggered by the recorder of deeds. When we record our deed, if they record a deed,
[54:47.520 --> 54:54.800]  that somehow they get a link or the assessor reviews that and then makes an assessment.
[54:54.800 --> 55:01.360]  And that's what actually triggers the taxation. Okay. Let's take a step back from that.
[55:01.360 --> 55:11.120]  Okay. How does your property, how does the state get acclaimed against your property?
[55:11.680 --> 55:14.400]  Let me go through a little history of how this all came about.
[55:15.440 --> 55:19.600]  Originally, if you had, I'm sure you've heard of a loyal title.
[55:20.560 --> 55:27.040]  It does. There's no reference to that in South Carolina. All I can find, and I even talk to
[55:27.040 --> 55:33.360]  agencies as far as I can, and there was no land patents ever issued in South Carolina.
[55:35.760 --> 55:43.440]  Well, that's interesting because as a rule, the only way they could tax a property
[55:44.560 --> 55:47.040]  is that they had to have a claim against the property.
[55:48.080 --> 55:52.240]  Right. Do you have private tax rolls in South Carolina?
[55:52.240 --> 55:58.560]  I'm not sure what you mean by that term. Send a letter to the tax assessor collector
[55:59.600 --> 56:02.560]  and ask the tax assessor, are your taxes paid up?
[56:04.560 --> 56:12.320]  I have one property. I let a small little parcel land. I let go through to tax sale. It is now,
[56:12.320 --> 56:14.880]  you know, a year of grace that I could purchase it back.
[56:14.880 --> 56:22.400]  Okay. Any other property? Do you have any property that has no tax claim against it?
[56:23.280 --> 56:28.160]  Well, they just issued them for the year, but generally speaking, yes, I do have other property,
[56:28.160 --> 56:35.200]  yes. Send a letter to the tax assessor and ask the tax assessor if the state of South Carolina
[56:35.200 --> 56:41.600]  has a claim against your property. Okay. They'll almost always send you a letter back saying we
[56:41.600 --> 56:45.520]  have no claim unless there's a tax lien. Right. Okay.
[56:45.520 --> 56:51.360]  Can you send a letter and ask them to take you off the public rolls and put you on the private rolls?
[56:52.880 --> 56:56.640]  This is the way guys have been getting their property off the tax rolls.
[56:59.280 --> 57:04.400]  I'm not an expert in it. These are what I've had people on the show addressing.
[57:04.400 --> 57:13.440]  Okay. Now, in our Title 12 taxation, the assessor is specifically given the duty
[57:14.560 --> 57:24.160]  to find all property or all land. I forget exactly. It's all land in South Carolina,
[57:24.160 --> 57:32.000]  I'm sorry, in this county, in a county level. This is state legislation, state taxation 12,
[57:32.000 --> 57:42.160]  but all land is to be entered onto the tax roll and all land is to be taxed, period.
[57:42.960 --> 57:47.440]  No, I mean, I've looked at that thing upside down backwards and there's no wiggle room.
[57:49.520 --> 57:53.920]  And I don't know how to get past that. I'm really not the one to go to talk to.
[57:53.920 --> 58:02.640]  Emerson and Alphonse are probably better to talk to than me because tax is not my area
[58:03.280 --> 58:10.800]  of particular expertise. And I suspect you are far more knowledgeable in this area than I am.
[58:11.840 --> 58:18.880]  Yeah. Whenever I lived in Pennsylvania years ago, I went in and researched the
[58:18.880 --> 58:24.480]  Lodio title and all lands in Pennsylvania and Maryland are supposed to be a Lodio.
[58:24.480 --> 58:31.760]  And I found the original land grant and all that. Now, they have land grants, colonial and state,
[58:32.320 --> 58:39.840]  but there's no mention, nothing ever of a land patent or direct terminology of a Lodio land
[58:39.840 --> 58:46.640]  that I can find yet anywhere for South Carolina. And I even, like I said, got a hold of archives
[58:46.640 --> 58:53.920]  and history on this stuff. Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.920 --> 59:00.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really
[59:00.000 --> 59:05.200]  help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.200 --> 59:10.720]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know
[59:10.720 --> 59:16.880]  God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three volume set called basic elements of
[59:16.880 --> 59:22.160]  the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life clearly presents
[59:22.160 --> 59:28.640]  God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free
[59:28.640 --> 59:35.280]  New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life, call Bibles for America
[59:35.280 --> 59:48.880]  toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.640 --> 59:54.720]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:54.720 --> 01:00:04.240]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.160 --> 01:00:12.240]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429
[01:00:12.240 --> 01:00:20.640]  an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.640 --> 01:00:28.960]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:28.960 --> 01:00:41.280]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:41.280 --> 01:00:52.240]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a tying suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.240 --> 01:00:58.080]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and
[01:00:58.080 --> 01:01:07.280]  entering 40. Today in history. And recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:01:07.280 --> 01:01:12.960]  1325 legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June county prosecutors around the state including
[01:01:12.960 --> 01:01:17.520]  Houston, Austin, San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:01:17.520 --> 01:01:22.160]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:27.360]  equipment to test the earth for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced
[01:01:27.360 --> 01:01:32.320]  earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:01:32.320 --> 01:01:36.880]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:01:36.880 --> 01:01:41.920]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:41.920 --> 01:01:48.160]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well
[01:01:48.160 --> 01:01:54.720]  as other cities too like the district attorney in El Paso, Cayman Esparza a Democrat who also
[01:01:54.720 --> 01:01:59.520]  stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of
[01:01:59.520 --> 01:02:04.880]  marijuana cases in El Paso. However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball
[01:02:04.880 --> 01:02:10.000]  an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:14.320]  on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone
[01:02:14.320 --> 01:02:23.920]  is charged with something the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University
[01:02:23.920 --> 01:02:29.040]  identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of
[01:02:29.040 --> 01:02:35.120]  Mexico the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other
[01:02:35.120 --> 01:02:40.320]  one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper
[01:02:40.320 --> 01:02:47.280]  the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized
[01:02:47.280 --> 01:03:00.480]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is Ruth Rody with your lowdown for July 22nd 2019.
[01:03:17.280 --> 01:03:26.480]  These warmongers come by that time Friday.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:36.480]  I won't pay for the war with my wife. I ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't pay for the fun.
[01:03:36.480 --> 01:03:42.800]  Okay we are back. Randy Calhoun, Brett Fountain, Rula Radio on this Friday the
[01:03:42.800 --> 01:03:52.320]  70th day of December 2021 and our call lines are open. Let me check the board. The board is full
[01:03:53.360 --> 01:03:56.640]  so I'm not going to give out the call in number. When someone drops off
[01:03:57.520 --> 01:04:04.480]  then you can call in our board can only hold four callers at one time. So if someone drops off you
[01:04:04.480 --> 01:04:15.440]  can call in at 512-646-1984 and we're talking to Jeff in South Carolina and Jeff. I think
[01:04:16.560 --> 01:04:24.000]  if I get a caller who has a issue with property tax I need to send him to you.
[01:04:27.520 --> 01:04:32.560]  I haven't been able to solve it and it's something that I've thought we're supposed to
[01:04:32.560 --> 01:04:38.400]  be secure as sovereigns on our land. I'm not getting carried away with the sovereigns business
[01:04:38.400 --> 01:04:45.120]  right now. I just mean that was the idea that we were kings on our land. How can I be secure in my
[01:04:45.120 --> 01:04:50.960]  personal property and effects when somebody can lay an obligation on me and take my property away
[01:04:50.960 --> 01:05:02.400]  from me every year? That is a good constitutional challenge. One they're not going to want to risk
[01:05:03.360 --> 01:05:12.080]  getting a negative ruling on. So if you can't get everything you want
[01:05:12.080 --> 01:05:20.000]  what would be the least acceptable outcome for you?
[01:05:21.360 --> 01:05:26.320]  My least acceptable outcome has always been no property tax.
[01:05:27.840 --> 01:05:36.720]  Okay. If anything less than that poses an ongoing threat to my security.
[01:05:36.720 --> 01:05:50.720]  Okay. Aside from property tax legislation how can you frame property tax legislation in a way
[01:05:51.840 --> 01:05:56.960]  that will give the appearance of a constitutional violation?
[01:05:56.960 --> 01:06:06.880]  Well, what comes to my mind right away and I can't find information beyond so is no right
[01:06:06.880 --> 01:06:12.960]  can be taxed and the right to property is undenied. So if I have property how are they
[01:06:12.960 --> 01:06:23.040]  taxing it? That is a very good argument. At the end of the day it's not what you can win
[01:06:23.040 --> 01:06:30.240]  or not win in court. I mean we would think reasonably and logically that that is the
[01:06:30.240 --> 01:06:37.920]  criteria but I'm going to suggest to you that it is not. The real criteria is what threat can you
[01:06:37.920 --> 01:06:48.400]  bring to the state of South Carolina that's great enough and of potential negative consequence to
[01:06:48.400 --> 01:06:54.240]  the point that they would make a deal with you to go away and leave you alone or does your
[01:06:55.600 --> 01:07:04.560]  intended ultimate outcome include eliminating property taxes for everyone in South Carolina?
[01:07:06.720 --> 01:07:11.920]  I'm not at this point I don't know that I'm picking up that burden but I would think if I
[01:07:11.920 --> 01:07:18.640]  can do it for myself anyone else could do it then too couldn't they? But I'm trying to get a
[01:07:18.640 --> 01:07:25.280]  distinction. If you don't know where you're going there is a good chance you're going to wind up
[01:07:25.280 --> 01:07:38.320]  somewhere else. So do you want to be able to stop paying taxes in South Carolina or do you want
[01:07:38.320 --> 01:07:48.080]  property taxes eliminated in South Carolina? I want my property tax eliminated in South Carolina.
[01:07:48.960 --> 01:07:57.520]  Okay now that is a whole different animal that goes to politics. Yeah so that gives you a
[01:07:59.840 --> 01:08:05.120]  low bar and a high bar and you'll take the low bar if you aim for
[01:08:05.120 --> 01:08:12.000]  or make it look like you're willing to go after them for the whole state then you'll
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:17.280]  settle for just you. One of the problems we have when we get into these fights
[01:08:18.800 --> 01:08:25.840]  is after a while it stops being about our intended outcome and starts being about the fight.
[01:08:27.040 --> 01:08:31.360]  Oh those dirty rats they did this to me and they did that to me and they gotta pay.
[01:08:31.360 --> 01:08:36.480]  And you forget why you started into this in the first place. A good friend of mine did
[01:08:37.520 --> 01:08:44.400]  income tax and she was in Pennsylvania helping someone. They said their next door neighbor had
[01:08:44.400 --> 01:08:52.000]  some income tax liens some tax liens against her property to your apple and she said well I'll
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:55.840]  talk to them and see. Well they gave her the tax liens and she looked at them and she said
[01:08:55.840 --> 01:08:59.120]  do you want to get rid of these tax liens? They said yes we do and they were just
[01:08:59.120 --> 01:09:05.600]  vilifying the IRS. She worked them up and threw them in the trash can. They're gone.
[01:09:06.720 --> 01:09:12.800]  They were what? Oh yeah they expired two years ago. The IRS didn't renew them.
[01:09:14.800 --> 01:09:22.080]  So what do these people do? They were incensed. They wrote a staving letter to the IRS.
[01:09:22.080 --> 01:09:29.760]  What do you think the IRS did? Anything possible to reinstate those liens?
[01:09:30.560 --> 01:09:39.120]  Exactly what they did. These people forgot what their outcome was. It stopped being about their
[01:09:39.120 --> 01:09:45.920]  intended outcome and became about the fight. They felt mistreated and put upon and they
[01:09:45.920 --> 01:09:54.480]  wanted to pay these people back. Keep your eye on the price. So if your purpose is to get them to
[01:09:54.480 --> 01:10:03.120]  stop charging you taxes that's a whole different animal than getting them to stop charging property
[01:10:03.120 --> 01:10:15.760]  taxes altogether. That becomes a simple calculation. How much is this guy going to cost me to try to
[01:10:15.760 --> 01:10:24.560]  collect taxes from him? If he's going to cost me more in litigation fees that I can collect from him
[01:10:25.680 --> 01:10:32.400]  then we need to find a way to handle this. Does that give you any ideas?
[01:10:34.240 --> 01:10:41.680]  Well yeah I mean just like you were saying that you can't tax a writer whatever. To me that sounds
[01:10:41.680 --> 01:10:53.440]  like a very sound issue to litigate. So what I'm saying is you sue at a high bar
[01:10:55.360 --> 01:11:00.960]  then you beat up the lawyers with bar grievances. You beat up the judge with judicial
[01:11:00.960 --> 01:11:09.280]  conduct complaints. You want them all upset, angry and wanting this off their plate so they can go
[01:11:09.280 --> 01:11:19.280]  back to business. So first you make a nuisance of yourself but you got to know when you're at a
[01:11:19.280 --> 01:11:26.640]  point at which you're winning. If they you know it's unlikely they will agree to not charge you
[01:11:26.640 --> 01:11:36.800]  any taxes. What would be the least amount of property tax that you would be willing to pay
[01:11:36.800 --> 01:11:44.880]  not to have this fight in the future? I don't want to mean zero tax because I feel
[01:11:45.920 --> 01:11:52.880]  I'm not asking what you want. I'm asking for what you would compromise for.
[01:11:55.280 --> 01:12:01.680]  Any tax, any property tax for me is unacceptable. I'm sorry that's how I feel.
[01:12:01.680 --> 01:12:09.040]  Well I can be pretty sure you're going to lose this fight.
[01:12:11.600 --> 01:12:21.280]  I'm relatively certain you're going to lose this fight because the state simply cannot let you win
[01:12:21.280 --> 01:12:29.120]  this fight period. The reason I say that as I did call in some time back on a property I left
[01:12:29.120 --> 01:12:37.280]  go, it was $16.99. I did not pay it. It went through and it has been sold. The tax lien has
[01:12:37.280 --> 01:12:42.640]  been sold. I don't have a year that I can go back and repurchase it. There's of course some
[01:12:44.560 --> 01:12:51.440]  cost involved and punishments and that's as far more than $16 now but I wanted to be,
[01:12:51.440 --> 01:12:57.920]  I wanted to at least establish that I was an injured party or I had claims, I had ability to
[01:12:57.920 --> 01:13:04.720]  claim that I had been damaged. By that I'm there attempting to separate me from my property over
[01:13:04.720 --> 01:13:13.040]  an original amount of $16.99. So this is why I say no tax can be acceptable because they can
[01:13:13.040 --> 01:13:20.720]  tax lien you out of your property. I'm going to suggest this is not a fight you can win.
[01:13:20.720 --> 01:13:28.000]  The state simply cannot afford to let you win this fight. It's not about the money,
[01:13:29.280 --> 01:13:38.400]  it's about the precedent you'll set. Absolutely right. So you're taking on an
[01:13:38.400 --> 01:13:44.240]  impossible battle so that leads me to a whole different consideration.
[01:13:44.240 --> 01:13:49.120]  Why do you have this death wish?
[01:13:51.920 --> 01:13:57.840]  How can I be secure in my personal, personal property and effects when they can take it
[01:13:57.840 --> 01:14:02.400]  from me? That will. Oh easy, just pays the tax.
[01:14:05.360 --> 01:14:11.680]  That's, and my earnings and my money is considered my property. So here again,
[01:14:11.680 --> 01:14:20.720]  they're, he has involuntary service to you. Yes, it is. And in a perfect world, they couldn't do that.
[01:14:22.560 --> 01:14:31.200]  But then again, if this were a perfect world, I wouldn't be in it. And I wonder about you.
[01:14:32.560 --> 01:14:38.240]  I have no problem with that. Let me give you a quick run down here. We've talked about this
[01:14:38.240 --> 01:14:44.800]  before, so I'll just run down through it. I asked the county assessor for the information that they
[01:14:45.360 --> 01:14:50.480]  assessed my property. They weren't responsive. I filed criminal charges against them with the
[01:14:50.480 --> 01:14:56.320]  district magistrate. That district magistrate would not accept them. So I filed charges against
[01:14:56.320 --> 01:15:01.680]  that district magistrate with another district magistrate and they've dumbed me down. They
[01:15:01.680 --> 01:15:07.280]  will not respond. Nothing. So I've gotten in touch with the state attorney general. They will not
[01:15:07.280 --> 01:15:14.720]  respond to me. Okay. Does the state attorney general in South Carolina have prosecutorial
[01:15:14.720 --> 01:15:22.080]  authority? For public corruption and public corruption is defined as any criminal activity
[01:15:22.080 --> 01:15:31.120]  by a public official. Okay. Let's, I'm trying to find a way you can win. If you could sue South
[01:15:31.120 --> 01:15:44.800]  Carolina under federal RICO and collect enough money from them in a settlement to pay your taxes
[01:15:44.800 --> 01:15:52.880]  for the rest of your life, would that be an acceptable outcome? Absolutely. Okay. Good.
[01:15:52.880 --> 01:16:00.880]  Now we've got something we can work with. That'll work. So how do we go after the state?
[01:16:04.480 --> 01:16:10.880]  You see, the state is not going to want to risk you winning this issue. They will spend any amount
[01:16:10.880 --> 01:16:20.880]  of money to keep you from winning this issue. And it, you know, most people bristle when I say
[01:16:20.880 --> 01:16:28.080]  the only way you're going to win is by making a deal. Oh, I don't want to make a deal with these
[01:16:28.080 --> 01:16:35.840]  no good ground rules. Well, good luck with that. In war, you never completely demolish your enemy.
[01:16:36.880 --> 01:16:40.320]  You beat them up to the point that you can make a deal and everybody go home.
[01:16:41.040 --> 01:16:47.280]  When we come back on the other side, let's talk about how we can manipulate them into a place,
[01:16:47.280 --> 01:16:51.600]  a position to give you the deal you want. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:16:51.600 --> 01:17:21.280]  who's on radio, we'll be right back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method. Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when
[01:17:21.280 --> 01:17:49.280]  contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.280 --> 01:17:59.280]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors net.
[01:18:20.280 --> 01:18:34.280]  How can I help Logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.280 --> 01:18:47.280]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I order? No.
[01:18:47.280 --> 01:19:00.280]  Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy Holidays Logos.
[01:19:18.280 --> 01:19:24.280]  Don't bore me.
[01:19:31.280 --> 01:19:41.280]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided but now I can see your back.
[01:19:41.280 --> 01:19:50.280]  You put the fear in my pocket. Took the money from my ass. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:50.280 --> 01:20:06.280]  Okay, we are back. Randy Carroll from Brett Fountain, ruleoflawradio. And on this Friday, the 17th day of December 2021, and we're talking to Jeff in South Carolina, and I hope everybody gets it.
[01:20:06.280 --> 01:20:26.280]  Or we're going here. If we are a purist and have an absolute, unflinching, unyielding outcome that we have to get no matter what, we're gonna lose.
[01:20:26.280 --> 01:20:41.280]  It's just how it works in the real world we live in. The whole world is about compromise. If you want to win, first you need to figure out what it is you're after at the end of the day.
[01:20:41.280 --> 01:20:56.280]  You know, I do this show and I've been doing this show a long time, but I know exactly what I'm doing. I am working toward a singular, very specific, intended outcome.
[01:20:56.280 --> 01:21:08.280]  It is my purpose to place every judge in the country in a position such that when they step up behind the bench and look out across the bar at the gallery, I want them wondering which one.
[01:21:08.280 --> 01:21:17.280]  Which one of those scoundrels sitting out there are waiting for me to render a ruling so they can run down to the grand jury and try to get me indicted.
[01:21:17.280 --> 01:21:23.280]  If I can get that done, I have served my purpose.
[01:21:23.280 --> 01:21:39.280]  And that filters every single thing I do. Everything I try to do, when someone says something to me and it really pisses me off.
[01:21:39.280 --> 01:21:47.280]  And I want to let them know how to cow eat the cabbage. This goal I have jumps up in my face.
[01:21:47.280 --> 01:21:56.280]  How will this lead me to my intended ultimate outcome? When the balist drug be downstairs, shoved me out the door and knocked me down and broke my elbow.
[01:21:56.280 --> 01:22:02.280]  To keep me from giving criminal complaints against the district attorney to the grand jury.
[01:22:02.280 --> 01:22:12.280]  I said, that dirty rotten scoundrel, that really hurt. I'm going to kick his behind and then something in my brain said, okay.
[01:22:12.280 --> 01:22:20.280]  In kicking his behind, how will that lead you closer to your intended ultimate outcome?
[01:22:20.280 --> 01:22:30.280]  And I simply could not find a way to frame that so it led me toward my outcome. So I didn't go after this balist.
[01:22:30.280 --> 01:22:38.280]  And by not going after this balist, all of a sudden I became the real deal.
[01:22:38.280 --> 01:22:48.280]  All of a sudden I wasn't just the radical flake. Everybody started paying more attention.
[01:22:48.280 --> 01:22:59.280]  This guy is focused. Being focused makes him bad news. Everybody got more careful with me. Jeff, does that make sense?
[01:22:59.280 --> 01:23:08.280]  Yes, it does. But I just wanted to throw in one correction. You said it pisses you off. I think on rural radio it's urinating you all.
[01:23:08.280 --> 01:23:14.280]  Oh, you're right about that. I'm sorry. Urinating me off. I can't say piss me off on the radio.
[01:23:14.280 --> 01:23:20.280]  I actually stuttered when I started to say that, but something else didn't come to mind.
[01:23:20.280 --> 01:23:39.280]  So, okay, yeah, you're urinating me off. But yeah, we need guidelines. And you need to know when you have reached a place that you didn't know exactly what the lowest, least acceptable outcome for you is.
[01:23:39.280 --> 01:23:55.280]  That doesn't mean you have to accept it. But you just have to know when you're on the winning side. And you have to have an outcome that's possible so that you can win.
[01:23:55.280 --> 01:24:13.280]  And in the end, it's all politics. You act like you want absolutes. And you beat them up and rail and write this indignation and jump up on your soapbox and go after them.
[01:24:13.280 --> 01:24:20.280]  And then when they're softened up enough, you come to them and say, let's make a deal.
[01:24:20.280 --> 01:24:31.280]  When you get them to the point, they'll make a deal that is within your least acceptable parameters. Now you are on the winning side.
[01:24:31.280 --> 01:24:38.280]  Now you can build your best outcome, but you have something realistic.
[01:24:38.280 --> 01:24:46.280]  So what I'm hearing you saying or kind of driving towards would be a Federal 42-1983?
[01:24:46.280 --> 01:24:57.280]  Oh yeah. And criminal complaints. File criminal complaints with the Special Agent Charge of the FBI, with the Federal Grand Jury, just make a nuisance of yourself.
[01:24:57.280 --> 01:25:09.280]  And then at one point, once you've got them beat up really good, then go to the judge and file a motion for and ask the judge to order mediation.
[01:25:09.280 --> 01:25:19.280]  If you're a pro se, you are their worst nightmare. One reason you're hard to deal with.
[01:25:19.280 --> 01:25:32.280]  The other one is, if they get beat by you, it will dramatically damage their career.
[01:25:32.280 --> 01:25:41.280]  What kind of lawyer or you that gets the floor wiped, gets wiped with a pro se litigant? You can't beat a pro se litigant.
[01:25:41.280 --> 01:25:49.280]  Why in the heck would we ever hire you? They're not ever going to come to you and offer you a deal.
[01:25:49.280 --> 01:26:04.280]  Unless the judge orders them to. Now they've got plausible deniability. Hey guys, don't blame us. The judge ordered us to make a deal. It's not us.
[01:26:04.280 --> 01:26:20.280]  So push them until they want a deal, but you know they can't ask for it. Then you ask for it. In good chance, they'll give you what you want just to get you off their docket and not have to deal with you anymore.
[01:26:20.280 --> 01:26:29.280]  What would they call politics guys? It's not about laws, it's about politics. We just use law to get us to politics.
[01:26:29.280 --> 01:26:36.280]  What would the cause of action be for 1983?
[01:26:36.280 --> 01:26:51.280]  Official oppression, ongoing criminal enterprise. You can claim that they are misapplying the laws. These guys can never get things right.
[01:26:51.280 --> 01:27:04.280]  They always make little errors. Just find anything you can to beat them up with. It doesn't really make any difference. It doesn't matter if you can win your claims or not.
[01:27:04.280 --> 01:27:17.280]  That's not what they're concerned about. They're concerned about one is a ruling against them that would cripple their ability to do their job and two is litigation costs.
[01:27:17.280 --> 01:27:30.280]  This guy has margrieved all our lawyers into the stone age. He's costing us a fortune. We're trying to collect chump change in taxes and this guy's costing us a fortune.
[01:27:30.280 --> 01:27:45.280]  Then you go to the judge and ask them to make a deal. Then they can make a deal, agree to seal the deal. They'll write you a deal good enough so you won't ever have to worry about taxes again.
[01:27:45.280 --> 01:27:58.280]  On a side comment there, South Carolina Supreme Court has a disciplinary board that handles lawyers and judges.
[01:27:58.280 --> 01:28:10.280]  The South Carolina Bar Association didn't want to hear anything about a bar complaint. They said you have to go to the South Carolina disciplinary board.
[01:28:10.280 --> 01:28:23.280]  Look, that is so much better. It's the same way in Colorado. In Colorado, they'll tell you you have to send your complaint to the bar and that's not true.
[01:28:23.280 --> 01:28:32.280]  You have to send it to the Colorado Supreme but the bar does not want you to do that so they'll lie to you.
[01:28:32.280 --> 01:28:36.280]  Isn't that the violation of another ethical rule for lawyers?
[01:28:36.280 --> 01:28:37.280]  Yeah, it is.
[01:28:37.280 --> 01:28:39.280]  No lying allowed.
[01:28:39.280 --> 01:28:44.280]  The Supreme you can beat up. That's even better.
[01:28:44.280 --> 01:28:59.280]  When I sent to the disciplinary board on the first district justice that would not accept or act on my verified criminal complaint, I sent that in against that district justice
[01:28:59.280 --> 01:29:14.280]  and a lady from the disciplinary board got in touch with me and said you can't include any personal identifiers or personal information and I looked down over and I said the only thing I can find is a fax number
[01:29:14.280 --> 01:29:27.280]  and a telephone number which was gotten from a public site but everything else is what your form is for and I sent it back in. I haven't heard anything back from them.
[01:29:27.280 --> 01:29:47.280]  Your whole point is this is all political. You have to become so politically difficult that you're costing them a whole lot of money while you're also placing them at risk of a negative outcome.
[01:29:47.280 --> 01:30:00.280]  I'd like to make Rico noises. Rico. Rico is defined by two or more per...
[01:30:00.280 --> 01:30:11.280]  Sorry soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat. A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:30:11.280 --> 01:30:17.280]  Dr. Kaepfer and Albrecht, I'll be back in a moment with the scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:42.280 --> 01:30:55.280]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:55.280 --> 01:31:02.280]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.280 --> 01:31:15.280]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite but unlike regular sugars don't deliver anything to squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.280 --> 01:31:23.280]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight and if you need to shed some pounds avoid the sweet stuff all together and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.280 --> 01:31:32.280]  I'm Dr. Kaepfer and Albrecht, more news and information at KaepferandAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:53.280 --> 01:32:00.280]  We are Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuildingSeven.org today.
[01:32:24.280 --> 01:32:34.280]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:34.280 --> 01:32:40.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.280 --> 01:32:47.280]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:47.280 --> 01:32:54.280]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.280 --> 01:32:59.280]  Order your copy today and together we can have the pre-society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.280 --> 01:33:15.280]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.280 --> 01:33:47.280]  The wicked come with temptation. They're trying to buy the whole place.
[01:33:47.280 --> 01:33:58.280]  They want to force new nations because they're falling from grace.
[01:33:58.280 --> 01:34:02.280]  I will not think back to us.
[01:34:02.280 --> 01:34:10.280]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. And, Jeff, you let me run off the cliff there.
[01:34:10.280 --> 01:34:14.280]  You did a splendid job, I'll explain this to you.
[01:34:14.280 --> 01:34:17.280]  I did a free fall.
[01:34:17.280 --> 01:34:23.280]  Okay, the whole point I'm trying to make with all of this is all politics.
[01:34:23.280 --> 01:34:28.280]  At the end of the day, it's all politics. It's all compromise.
[01:34:28.280 --> 01:34:39.280]  So, you know, when people are looking at going to jail, fight them like a tiger and then take the best deal you can take.
[01:34:39.280 --> 01:34:45.280]  Don't feel like you're betraying anyone by taking a deal. Liberty's most important.
[01:34:45.280 --> 01:35:01.280]  Here, you're talking about property tax. If you could get them to give you enough money that it would cover any property tax you would have to pay, then you could pay your property tax and laugh all the way to the bank.
[01:35:01.280 --> 01:35:03.280]  Right, I agree.
[01:35:03.280 --> 01:35:20.280]  I'm in a small town and several years ago, I took a dossier to the gasler, president of the Katie Railroad, and told him that we were losing 24 people a year because of these rock trucks out here on Highway 114.
[01:35:20.280 --> 01:35:24.280]  And you've got this railroad and you're not using it.
[01:35:24.280 --> 01:35:39.280]  And just crawl down his throat. Well, six months later, we see all of these trucks with these electronic equipment that's examining the rails, and then for a year, they're working on it.
[01:35:39.280 --> 01:35:46.280]  And then I had one of my customers call me to clean up a set of trucks that he was going to sell.
[01:35:46.280 --> 01:35:55.280]  And this is 85 and we just had a recession here. And I said, well, must not be much rock moving since this recession.
[01:35:55.280 --> 01:36:02.280]  And he said, play rock moving. Damn railroad hauling at all.
[01:36:02.280 --> 01:36:08.280]  We're not using it, losing 24 people a year on this highway.
[01:36:08.280 --> 01:36:12.280]  Nobody knows I did that.
[01:36:12.280 --> 01:36:17.280]  But me and gasler, president of the Katie. Don't tell everybody.
[01:36:17.280 --> 01:36:28.280]  But I sit here and Deborah one time complained about the train noise in the background and I told her what I had done.
[01:36:28.280 --> 01:36:33.280]  She never complained about the train noise again.
[01:36:33.280 --> 01:36:39.280]  If you can beat them, only you need to know you beat them.
[01:36:39.280 --> 01:36:48.280]  If you can force these guys to pay you enough to pay your taxes with their money, would that be a problem for you?
[01:36:48.280 --> 01:36:50.280]  I can live with that.
[01:36:50.280 --> 01:36:57.280]  Good. That's all we need. We need a goal. We need need to know when we're winning when we're losing.
[01:36:57.280 --> 01:37:05.280]  And this stuff of purism, you know, everything has to be exactly perfect. Good luck with that.
[01:37:05.280 --> 01:37:09.280]  Never has been. I don't think it ever will be.
[01:37:09.280 --> 01:37:15.280]  So where are you? Call us back next week.
[01:37:15.280 --> 01:37:30.280]  Think about this. How could you set this up where you think you can beat them up enough that they'll want you out of their hair so they can go back to collecting their taxes and not putting out money on lawyers?
[01:37:30.280 --> 01:37:35.280]  What could you do to beat them into that position?
[01:37:35.280 --> 01:37:46.280]  Well, I've been kind of trying to work on it at low kind of moderate pace, but I can't get past the magistrates and nobody else wants to talk to me.
[01:37:46.280 --> 01:37:55.280]  Well, what does the law in South Carolina say is the duty of a magistrate?
[01:37:55.280 --> 01:38:13.280]  They, according to Title 22, Section 5-110, when a non-law enforcement officer person delivers a request for a warrant, they must issue a summons.
[01:38:13.280 --> 01:38:15.280]  That's a warrant.
[01:38:15.280 --> 01:38:17.280]  Right.
[01:38:17.280 --> 01:38:20.280]  Okay. Do they issue their summons?
[01:38:20.280 --> 01:38:22.280]  No. They won't act on it.
[01:38:22.280 --> 01:38:29.280]  What is the statute that reflects 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act?
[01:38:29.280 --> 01:38:32.280]  First of all, misconduct.
[01:38:32.280 --> 01:39:01.280]  I sent that to you. I think it's our Criminal Code 16, Chapter 17, Section 735, in there, talks about anybody that supports, interacts in a public capacity or trying to act in a public capacity and denies or impedes anybody in an exercise of right privilege or immunity is guilty of misdemeanor.
[01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:13.280]  Okay. Have you filed complaints against the magistrate who refused to act with another magistrate, perhaps the Chief Justice of the State Supreme?
[01:39:13.280 --> 01:39:15.280]  Well, see, there immediately I can't...
[01:39:15.280 --> 01:39:17.280]  Oh, that's right. A magistrate issue.
[01:39:17.280 --> 01:39:32.280]  That's right. Yeah, I cannot find where now the State Attorney General has the authority to get involved in public corruption, but I can't find these other links to continue the chain upward.
[01:39:32.280 --> 01:39:38.280]  Take it to the Fed. If you don't have it in the state, take it to the Fed.
[01:39:38.280 --> 01:39:43.280]  I'm going to have to do some heavy reinforcing there because I really haven't done any study in that area.
[01:39:43.280 --> 01:39:47.280]  Fed's easy. Fed's easier in state.
[01:39:47.280 --> 01:40:04.280]  You accuse the magistrate of denying you in due process, in procedural due process, and that is harm per se, and that's a violation of 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:40:04.280 --> 01:40:20.280]  So you make up a complaint against the magistrate, and you find out who the local special agent in charge of the FBI is, and you send it to him because we now have secret police, the FBI or secret police now.
[01:40:20.280 --> 01:40:22.280]  They won't tell you who they are.
[01:40:22.280 --> 01:40:26.280]  The only name you can get is the special agent in charge.
[01:40:26.280 --> 01:40:31.280]  So you send it to him or her.
[01:40:31.280 --> 01:40:37.280]  And with instructions to give it to the grand jury.
[01:40:37.280 --> 01:40:42.280]  And you put a cover page on it and ask him to return the cover page to you so you know he received it.
[01:40:42.280 --> 01:40:49.280]  And when you send it to him, you send it registered insured.
[01:40:49.280 --> 01:40:52.280]  It costs you about $10 or $15 to insure it.
[01:40:52.280 --> 01:40:57.280]  It comes insured for $50, but you want to insure it for more than that.
[01:40:57.280 --> 01:41:00.280]  So insure it for $500 or $1,000.
[01:41:00.280 --> 01:41:07.280]  And put a cover letter on it and ask the special agent in charge to send that cover back letter back to you so you know he received it.
[01:41:07.280 --> 01:41:10.280]  Well, he's not going to do that.
[01:41:10.280 --> 01:41:20.280]  And when you don't get that cover letter back, then that gives you reasonable probable cause to believe that he didn't get it.
[01:41:20.280 --> 01:41:25.280]  So you run down to the postal inspector and she wants your $500.
[01:41:25.280 --> 01:41:29.280]  Well, they're not going to want to give you your $500.
[01:41:29.280 --> 01:41:36.280]  So they're going to run down to the special agent in charge and land on him like a ton of bricks.
[01:41:36.280 --> 01:41:41.280]  The FBI and the postal inspector don't like one another.
[01:41:41.280 --> 01:41:47.280]  And you give the postal inspectors an opportunity to go beat up the FBI.
[01:41:47.280 --> 01:41:51.280]  They're going to consider that a Christmas present.
[01:41:51.280 --> 01:42:01.280]  And they will bring you back a sworn letter from the special agent in charge that he actually got that document.
[01:42:01.280 --> 01:42:05.280]  Because the postal inspectors are not going to want to pay you $500.
[01:42:05.280 --> 01:42:11.280]  They don't care about $500, but that will raise their bond rating.
[01:42:11.280 --> 01:42:14.280]  And they don't want that to happen.
[01:42:14.280 --> 01:42:17.280]  So now you got proof he got it.
[01:42:17.280 --> 01:42:24.280]  And now you have reason to believe that he secreted or shielded the accused from prosecution.
[01:42:24.280 --> 01:42:36.280]  So he sent a second complaint to the address of the U.S. attorney directed to the federal grand jury.
[01:42:36.280 --> 01:42:39.280]  And the U.S. attorney is going to intercept it.
[01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:44.280]  And he's likely to call you and make all kinds of threats against you.
[01:42:44.280 --> 01:42:52.280]  Then you file criminal charges against the district attorney for tampering with U.S. mail.
[01:42:52.280 --> 01:43:01.280]  Now all these state officials are down here looking at you beating up the federal officials for not coming after these state officials.
[01:43:01.280 --> 01:43:04.280]  How do you think they're going to feel?
[01:43:04.280 --> 01:43:08.280]  Maybe a little bit uncomfortable.
[01:43:08.280 --> 01:43:12.280]  And then you file suit against them in the federal court.
[01:43:12.280 --> 01:43:18.280]  The best way I like to do it is to file a petition for declaratory judgment.
[01:43:18.280 --> 01:43:24.280]  That helps you get around a Rule 12B6 motion to dismiss for failure to stay to claim.
[01:43:24.280 --> 01:43:28.280]  And I'll explain that when we come back on the other side.
[01:43:28.280 --> 01:43:31.280]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:31.280 --> 01:43:39.280]  And I know I'm taking a lot of time with this, but this really goes to something that I believe is really important.
[01:43:39.280 --> 01:43:47.280]  We really need to understand the politics of these situations beyond just the law.
[01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:53.280]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.280 --> 01:44:06.280]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.280 --> 01:44:09.280]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.280 --> 01:44:11.280]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.280 --> 01:44:17.280]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.280 --> 01:44:22.280]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.280 --> 01:44:25.280]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.280 --> 01:44:31.280]  Logo civilian network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.280 --> 01:44:34.280]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.280 --> 01:44:39.280]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.280 --> 01:44:47.280]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.280 --> 01:44:51.280]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.280 --> 01:44:58.280]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.280 --> 01:45:00.280]  Order now.
[01:45:00.280 --> 01:45:04.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.280 --> 01:45:11.280]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[01:45:11.280 --> 01:45:15.280]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:19.280]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.280 --> 01:45:23.280]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.280 --> 01:45:28.280]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.280 --> 01:45:34.280]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.280 --> 01:45:43.280]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.280 --> 01:45:52.280]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.280 --> 01:46:01.280]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.280 --> 01:46:49.280]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Sound, and ruleoflawradio.
[01:46:49.280 --> 01:46:59.280]  I probably need to move along, but I started out today wanting to go to politics.
[01:46:59.280 --> 01:47:03.280]  Jeff, everything you're doing is about politics.
[01:47:03.280 --> 01:47:09.280]  It seems like it's about law, but law is just the way we get their attention.
[01:47:09.280 --> 01:47:25.280]  The way we win it is with politics. When you're fighting with the feds and the feds are not prosecuting state officials, the state officials are going to be down there terrified.
[01:47:25.280 --> 01:47:32.280]  And when you're doing this, everything you send to the state, you need to send to these state officials.
[01:47:32.280 --> 01:47:40.280]  I'm sorry, everything you send to the fed, you need to send to the state officials, so they know what you're trying to do to them in the fed.
[01:47:40.280 --> 01:47:46.280]  They don't need to be copied, but it's okay to do it.
[01:47:46.280 --> 01:47:49.280]  Let them know what you're trying to do to them.
[01:47:49.280 --> 01:47:57.280]  In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, we went after an IRS agent, and I filed with the special agent in charge.
[01:47:57.280 --> 01:48:12.280]  He didn't respond, so I filed with the U.S. Attorney, with the grand jury, and the U.S. Attorney called me and told me that if I tried to contact the grand jury again, he would charge me with jury tampering.
[01:48:12.280 --> 01:48:15.280]  I told him, knock yourself out.
[01:48:15.280 --> 01:48:17.280]  You charge me with jury tampering.
[01:48:17.280 --> 01:48:27.280]  You can do with what was it, healing from prosecution, and we'll see how this works out for you.
[01:48:27.280 --> 01:48:33.280]  And the next day, they fired the IRS agent.
[01:48:33.280 --> 01:48:37.280]  What they're doing is all huff and puff.
[01:48:37.280 --> 01:48:39.280]  The feds will try to frighten you off.
[01:48:39.280 --> 01:48:43.280]  The U.S. Attorney thinks everybody's terrified of him.
[01:48:43.280 --> 01:48:49.280]  The only one that doesn't have to be terrified of a U.S. Attorney is a private citizen.
[01:48:49.280 --> 01:49:04.280]  You, Jeff, you're the most powerful motor scooter in the building, and when the feds figure out you know that, then they're going to contact these state officials and say, guys, you better do something.
[01:49:04.280 --> 01:49:09.280]  I'm not throwing myself under the bus for you.
[01:49:09.280 --> 01:49:11.280]  Does that make sense, Jeff?
[01:49:11.280 --> 01:49:16.280]  Just to clarify something here, so I'll get on my way and you can take other callers.
[01:49:16.280 --> 01:49:20.280]  I thank you so much for your time, but you were, according to...
[01:49:20.280 --> 01:49:25.280]  I'm kind of feeling like I'm hitting a ceiling at this point due to the structure here in South Carolina.
[01:49:25.280 --> 01:49:39.280]  But you're saying I should focus on the violation of procedural due process with the local district justice, but file that in 1842 in the Fed.
[01:49:39.280 --> 01:49:42.280]  Well, you look at North Carolina.
[01:49:42.280 --> 01:49:45.280]  In Texas, we have a RICO statute.
[01:49:45.280 --> 01:49:52.280]  It's called Street Gang, Penal Code Chapter 71.
[01:49:52.280 --> 01:50:08.280]  You have to have some organized crime statute in South Carolina and accuse the magistrate of acting in an ongoing criminal conspiracy to deny due process.
[01:50:08.280 --> 01:50:11.280]  That's not going to make him happy.
[01:50:11.280 --> 01:50:14.280]  And accuse him of shielding from prosecution.
[01:50:14.280 --> 01:50:24.280]  You have to have a statute similar to that that goes to someone who would shield somebody else from prosecution.
[01:50:24.280 --> 01:50:32.280]  You know, if I'm a bad guy and I'm working with another bad guy and they come to me for information and I have information,
[01:50:32.280 --> 01:50:40.280]  but don't give it to them, they're going to want a way to come after me, you've got to have that statute in South Carolina.
[01:50:40.280 --> 01:50:43.280]  Okay, can you repeat down a little slower?
[01:50:43.280 --> 01:50:47.280]  I was trying to write, but you were talking about the organized criminal...
[01:50:47.280 --> 01:50:49.280]  Organized crime statute.
[01:50:49.280 --> 01:50:54.280]  You're going to have one in North Carolina, I'm sorry, South Carolina.
[01:50:54.280 --> 01:51:00.280]  Every state is going to have a statute that goes to organized crime.
[01:51:00.280 --> 01:51:05.280]  What they don't expect is you have to use the statute against them.
[01:51:05.280 --> 01:51:06.280]  Right.
[01:51:06.280 --> 01:51:19.280]  And if you go to two magistrates and both magistrates act in concert and collusion with one another and fail to perform their duty for the purpose of shielding the accused from prosecution,
[01:51:19.280 --> 01:51:21.280]  you've got organized crime.
[01:51:21.280 --> 01:51:23.280]  You've got RICO.
[01:51:23.280 --> 01:51:26.280]  And the State Attorney General.
[01:51:26.280 --> 01:51:28.280]  Oh, even better.
[01:51:28.280 --> 01:51:32.280]  Yeah, I've sent in to the State Attorney General and they won't reply.
[01:51:32.280 --> 01:51:44.280]  I informed them of the district justice of bad behavior and let them know that criminal affidavits were filed and they...no response, zero.
[01:51:44.280 --> 01:51:52.280]  Okay, but you said the organized crime statute and then you...I think you listed two other things that I should be able to review.
[01:51:52.280 --> 01:51:55.280]  Can you tell me what they were again, please?
[01:51:55.280 --> 01:51:58.280]  Shielding from prosecution is one.
[01:51:58.280 --> 01:52:00.280]  Okay.
[01:52:00.280 --> 01:52:04.280]  And I'm not sure what the other one was.
[01:52:04.280 --> 01:52:06.280]  I'm thinking.
[01:52:06.280 --> 01:52:09.280]  And my head hurts.
[01:52:09.280 --> 01:52:11.280]  Okay.
[01:52:11.280 --> 01:52:13.280]  All right, now give me something to work on.
[01:52:13.280 --> 01:52:15.280]  I'll see one so I can talk with.
[01:52:15.280 --> 01:52:17.280]  Maybe I can get back with you next week.
[01:52:17.280 --> 01:52:18.280]  Who knows?
[01:52:18.280 --> 01:52:19.280]  You've taken a lot of time.
[01:52:19.280 --> 01:52:20.280]  Thank you so much.
[01:52:20.280 --> 01:52:22.280]  You guys are marvelous.
[01:52:22.280 --> 01:52:27.280]  I still can't make the good use out of Telegram and the Alphonse site.
[01:52:27.280 --> 01:52:32.280]  I go in and dig around, but I'm not sure I'm making most of that, but I'm trying.
[01:52:32.280 --> 01:52:35.280]  So the battle goes on.
[01:52:35.280 --> 01:52:37.280]  Okay, wonderful.
[01:52:37.280 --> 01:52:38.280]  Thank you, Jeff.
[01:52:38.280 --> 01:52:41.280]  Now we're going to go to Mary in Texas.
[01:52:41.280 --> 01:52:43.280]  Hello, Miss Mary.
[01:52:43.280 --> 01:52:44.280]  Good evening.
[01:52:44.280 --> 01:52:45.280]  How are you?
[01:52:45.280 --> 01:52:47.280]  I am good.
[01:52:47.280 --> 01:52:51.280]  Hi, Brad.
[01:52:51.280 --> 01:53:04.280]  What are you up to today?
[01:53:04.280 --> 01:53:06.280]  Well, several things.
[01:53:06.280 --> 01:53:20.280]  I was wondering, Brad, if you could look up the lawsuit that Ken Paxton here in Texas lost regarding special powers our attorney general could have during election fraud that belong to the DA.
[01:53:20.280 --> 01:53:30.280]  Some of my Republican friends were upset about this today at one of our meetings, and I got there a little late, so I wasn't able to go over all of that.
[01:53:30.280 --> 01:53:38.280]  Okay, so you want to find out what rights does he have to address election fraud?
[01:53:38.280 --> 01:53:40.280]  Let me address this.
[01:53:40.280 --> 01:54:00.280]  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued a ruling today that essentially said that the attorney general had no prosecutorial power in the matter of a claim of election fraud.
[01:54:00.280 --> 01:54:06.280]  That was absolutely correct.
[01:54:06.280 --> 01:54:13.280]  This goes to what the Court of Criminal Appeals said from what I hear.
[01:54:13.280 --> 01:54:19.280]  I haven't seen the opinion yet, but they said this needed to go to a district attorney, a prosecuting attorney.
[01:54:19.280 --> 01:54:21.280]  No, it doesn't.
[01:54:21.280 --> 01:54:31.280]  It needs to go to some magistrate, and the magistrate is ordered to issue a warrant when you file the complaint of election fraud.
[01:54:31.280 --> 01:54:35.280]  The Court of Criminal Appeals got it wrong, and we're going to hammer them for that.
[01:54:35.280 --> 01:54:40.280]  Okay, well how do we get involved at this point?
[01:54:40.280 --> 01:54:46.280]  File criminal charges against whoever the person is with some magistrate.
[01:54:46.280 --> 01:54:49.280]  That made the ruling?
[01:54:49.280 --> 01:54:51.280]  No.
[01:54:51.280 --> 01:55:00.280]  Whoever you're accusing of election fraud, you file a criminal complaint against them with a magistrate.
[01:55:00.280 --> 01:55:03.280]  I'm not talking about you in particular, but whoever.
[01:55:03.280 --> 01:55:08.280]  The best magistrate to do this with is a district judge.
[01:55:08.280 --> 01:55:22.280]  Look at the complaints filed against the Travis County District Attorney with the district judges in Travis County.
[01:55:22.280 --> 01:55:30.280]  In that complaint, I asked for a Court of Inquiry.
[01:55:30.280 --> 01:55:40.280]  So in order to get a Court of Inquiry, you must file the complaint with a district judge in his capacity as a magistrate,
[01:55:40.280 --> 01:55:46.280]  because only a district judge can request a Court of Inquiry.
[01:55:46.280 --> 01:55:52.280]  So this gives you a reason to file criminal charges with the district court.
[01:55:52.280 --> 01:56:01.280]  The district judge in their capacity as a magistrate, and if they don't issue a warrant,
[01:56:01.280 --> 01:56:06.280]  did you file criminal charges against the district judge with someone else,
[01:56:06.280 --> 01:56:15.280]  like a Court of Appeals judge or a Court of Criminal Appeals judge or a Supreme Court magistrate?
[01:56:15.280 --> 01:56:18.280]  I'm sorry, the Supreme Court justice.
[01:56:18.280 --> 01:56:21.280]  They're all magistrates.
[01:56:21.280 --> 01:56:25.280]  I'm starting to think maybe we've got to go after the county recorders and the mayors,
[01:56:25.280 --> 01:56:33.280]  because these judges seem to have this down to a science about shielding.
[01:56:33.280 --> 01:56:36.280]  No, they don't.
[01:56:36.280 --> 01:56:38.280]  They don't have squat.
[01:56:38.280 --> 01:56:43.280]  They've just never had anybody come after them this way.
[01:56:43.280 --> 01:56:45.280]  They're not used to it.
[01:56:45.280 --> 01:56:55.280]  It would look like to give it to a mayor or a county court, because as soon as the fat little married ladies start getting fired
[01:56:55.280 --> 01:57:05.280]  and losing the insurance for their families and stuff, I know these women don't sit down quietly when they've been molested.
[01:57:05.280 --> 01:57:07.280]  Well, you could do that.
[01:57:07.280 --> 01:57:13.280]  I prefer to go up higher, because when you get a higher level public official
[01:57:13.280 --> 01:57:19.280]  who feels like he's throwing himself under the bus for some low-level Trump,
[01:57:19.280 --> 01:57:24.280]  they're more likely to say, I'm not going to do this.
[01:57:24.280 --> 01:57:31.280]  I'm not going to risk my career to protect you from you being stupid.
[01:57:31.280 --> 01:57:35.280]  Okay, so this ruling, did you read it today?
[01:57:35.280 --> 01:57:38.280]  No, I haven't got it yet.
[01:57:38.280 --> 01:57:41.280]  Okay, so we'll look into that next week, maybe.
[01:57:41.280 --> 01:57:43.280]  Yes.
[01:57:43.280 --> 01:57:45.280]  I will be up to speed.
[01:57:45.280 --> 01:57:47.280]  Wait.
[01:57:47.280 --> 01:57:54.280]  That being said, I think I was abused today in court.
[01:57:54.280 --> 01:57:57.280]  Oh, you don't say.
[01:57:57.280 --> 01:58:02.280]  You were in one of our public officials with Lawless?
[01:58:02.280 --> 01:58:10.280]  Well, it was a soy boy, and I think he needed to have some power, which they bought in your day.
[01:58:10.280 --> 01:58:19.280]  Okay, that's pretty cryptic.
[01:58:19.280 --> 01:58:21.280]  What's going on?
[01:58:21.280 --> 01:58:24.280]  Could you give us some background?
[01:58:24.280 --> 01:58:30.280]  Well, he was giving me legal advice over the phone, telling me the court was closed today.
[01:58:30.280 --> 01:58:32.280]  Who was?
[01:58:32.280 --> 01:58:42.280]  One of the civil law courts in the county court, the county court's office.
[01:58:42.280 --> 01:58:50.280]  And everything was fine, and my document got submitted, but he tried to persuade me not to come to the court today and present the document.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:58.280]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.280 --> 01:59:06.280]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.280 --> 01:59:09.280]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.280 --> 01:59:18.280]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.280 --> 01:59:27.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:27.280 --> 01:59:33.280]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.280 --> 01:59:47.280]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.280 --> 01:59:50.280]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:50.280 --> 02:00:00.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.