[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:13.040]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019, open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.040 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, brand crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.680]  $62.47 a barrel, and crypto is in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.680 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Whitecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.920 --> 00:52.400]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:57.760]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[00:57.760 --> 01:04.720]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:04.720 --> 01:09.760]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hempett attacks
[01:09.760 --> 01:15.040]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, San Antonio,
[01:15.040 --> 01:19.080]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones, since they
[01:19.080 --> 01:23.200]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:23.200 --> 01:28.240]  or for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month
[01:28.240 --> 01:33.360]  that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.360 --> 01:37.600]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.600 --> 01:42.720]  that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas
[01:42.720 --> 01:49.200]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities,
[01:49.200 --> 01:55.520]  too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier
[01:55.520 --> 02:00.480]  this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases
[02:00.480 --> 02:05.680]  in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant
[02:05.680 --> 02:10.400]  public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what
[02:10.400 --> 02:14.960]  makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged
[02:14.960 --> 02:24.480]  with something, the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified
[02:24.480 --> 02:29.840]  a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[02:29.840 --> 02:35.360]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[02:35.360 --> 02:40.640]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[02:40.640 --> 02:47.360]  shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins. For the purpose, it is hypothesized
[02:47.360 --> 03:12.640]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is what happens when you call the cops,
[03:12.640 --> 03:20.720]  this is what happens when you call the cops, this is what happens when you call the cops,
[03:20.720 --> 03:25.120]  you get your rights violated or you all get shot. I'm sick of people being victimized by
[03:25.120 --> 03:29.280]  criminal cops. Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood blocks. They clip with pepper,
[03:29.280 --> 03:33.680]  spray, mate, truck, cases and glass. They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts.
[03:33.680 --> 03:37.680]  Forget what you talk, these cops have got a license to kill. Witness intimidation means that
[03:37.680 --> 03:41.520]  they can use it, it will. Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal. And
[03:41.520 --> 03:45.040]  if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal for real. That's why they
[03:45.040 --> 03:49.440]  stopping me, locking me up and stopping me, confiscating my property, talking in my democracy,
[03:49.440 --> 03:53.440]  making the poor commodity, profiting off of poverty, enforcing the policy, supporting
[03:53.440 --> 03:58.240]  prison economy. Yeah, no one makes money when the violence stops. Hatin' brutality's the way to
[03:58.240 --> 04:02.480]  make a criminal crock. Blood in the gutter's how to wish whether they credit the top. That's why
[04:02.480 --> 04:08.640]  this is what happens when you call the cops. All right folks, good evening. This is the Monday
[04:08.640 --> 04:16.480]  night rule of law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. It is October 25th, 2021. We are live
[04:16.480 --> 04:22.000]  tonight. This is not a recording. I am actually here. With all the other things going on here
[04:22.000 --> 04:26.320]  lately, it's kind of hard to decide when a show is going to happen, when it's not. But we take it
[04:26.320 --> 04:32.080]  as we get it. That said, I am currently working on several different things at the moment,
[04:32.080 --> 04:38.960]  including a graph for Randy that I've been spending probably three weeks on trying to get all the
[04:39.120 --> 04:44.960]  material gathered that is likely to be applicable to it so we can get the structuring done.
[04:46.160 --> 04:53.120]  And the graph literally shows the step-by-step procedures that Texas law actually mandates
[04:53.120 --> 05:04.480]  for a criminal prosecution. But in that same graph, it highlights exactly how the courts
[05:04.480 --> 05:12.160]  and the prosecutors are skipping due process rights and requirements in order to get to trial
[05:12.160 --> 05:17.360]  as quickly as possible without doing any investigations, gathering any evidence, etc.,
[05:17.360 --> 05:22.160]  etc. On top of that, I'm working on a couple other things, one of which was a letter that I
[05:22.160 --> 05:27.600]  got sent a couple days ago that is directed toward the governor and several other folks
[05:27.600 --> 05:35.680]  dealing with Terrell County about a resolution they just enacted. And part of this letter deals with
[05:36.880 --> 05:40.480]  all the reasons why what the Terrell County
[05:41.600 --> 05:47.760]  Commissioners Court did is unconstitutional and why chapter 418 of the government code
[05:47.760 --> 05:54.080]  has multiple unconstitutional sections and provisions in it. So what I'm trying to do
[05:54.080 --> 06:03.440]  is review what the person wrote and basically state it in a way that makes it legally arguable,
[06:03.440 --> 06:11.200]  etc., etc., so that we can file this as a proper petition of grievances and get an actual response.
[06:12.080 --> 06:15.920]  So what I'd like to do before we start taking calls tonight is go a little bit over
[06:15.920 --> 06:25.920]  some of what is going on here. Now in this declaration, it's basically a declaration of local
[06:25.920 --> 06:36.400]  disaster. And chapter 418 of the Texas government code was enacted in 1975 and it's called the
[06:36.400 --> 06:42.000]  State Disaster Preparedness Act or something to that effect, something very similar to that.
[06:42.000 --> 06:50.400]  But either way, it purports to give specific offices and officers of the state and local
[06:50.400 --> 06:56.800]  political subdivisions an array of powers that they cannot constitutionally wield.
[06:58.080 --> 07:03.840]  A good example here is some of the powers that are being used by the Terrell County
[07:03.840 --> 07:11.360]  Commissioners Court is under the direction of the county judge there. Now the problem with
[07:11.360 --> 07:19.120]  the county judge being given the power that is stated by this result, this declaration that
[07:19.120 --> 07:28.960]  they've got here is that it purports in this that the Terrell County judge has determined that
[07:28.960 --> 07:39.120]  extortacy, where is it? Ah, whereas pursuant to the Texas Disaster Act of 1975, the county judge
[07:39.120 --> 07:44.640]  is designated as the Emergency Management Director of the County of Terrell and may exercise the
[07:44.640 --> 07:55.680]  powers granted to the governor on an appropriate local scale. No, absolutely not. A judge is a
[07:55.680 --> 08:03.600]  judicial officer. The governor is an executive officer. Such an act would be a direct violation
[08:03.600 --> 08:11.600]  of Article 2, Section 1, the separation of powers clause. The judge of a county, no judge,
[08:11.600 --> 08:22.000]  no matter what level they're at, can exercise the governor's powers on any level. Period. To do so
[08:22.000 --> 08:28.000]  is a knowing and willful violation of the Texas Constitution, no matter what the legislature
[08:28.000 --> 08:34.480]  tried to enact. Not only is it an act of sedition for the legislature to attempt to create a law
[08:34.480 --> 08:40.080]  of doing this, it's actual sedition for an individual officer of the state or a political
[08:40.080 --> 08:47.520]  subdivision to attempt to exercise the power that they know they constitutionally cannot use
[08:48.640 --> 08:57.520]  and do not have and can never be given. And yet they're making that claim in this document that
[08:57.520 --> 09:04.160]  the judge can do this. As a judicial officer, the judge is not responsible for any executive
[09:04.160 --> 09:11.680]  functions and cannot exercise any power relative to an executive function. Period. So making a judge
[09:11.680 --> 09:17.680]  the county emergency officer and in trying to give them such powers is unconstitutional on its face.
[09:17.680 --> 09:26.000]  No s, no ns, no buts. Not to mention the fact there are other problems with this document,
[09:26.000 --> 09:33.280]  including the logic used to make it. So what I want to do is I want to go through part of what
[09:33.280 --> 09:38.640]  I'm writing up. I'm not going to go through the original document because I haven't got to go
[09:38.640 --> 09:43.920]  through the whole thing yet as far as the rewrite. So I'm going to go through what bit of it I've
[09:43.920 --> 09:51.840]  actually managed to rewrite so far to put into a, an arguable court-ready presentation.
[09:51.840 --> 10:00.400]  Should it come to that? Okay. Skipping the individual who's actually making it, we'll just
[10:00.400 --> 10:05.360]  start with this. All recipients of this petition, and it's got an entire list of public officials
[10:05.360 --> 10:12.240]  to whom it's being addressed, should consider and address the issues contained here in the
[10:12.240 --> 10:17.280]  in accordance with the provisions of article one, section 27 of the Texas Constitution,
[10:17.280 --> 10:23.200]  i.e. the Bill of Rights. The exercise of all governmental power is subject to the provisions
[10:23.200 --> 10:29.280]  of the specific constitution or constitutions that grant the power and authority to a political body
[10:29.280 --> 10:35.760]  or actor to engage in any governmental act. No governmental actor or body may simply shrug
[10:35.760 --> 10:40.400]  their shoulders and decide the constitutional provisions, the very provisions that are
[10:40.400 --> 10:46.400]  gave them the power to act in the first place, no longer has any power over them or their actions
[10:46.400 --> 10:53.520]  once they take office, regardless of the proposed or alleged necessity or emergency used to give rise
[10:53.520 --> 10:59.760]  to the attempts of such persons to ignore or overthrow the specific and inherent limitations
[10:59.760 --> 11:06.160]  imposed upon them thereby. The constitution is not suspended when the government declares a
[11:06.160 --> 11:14.880]  state of disaster. Henry Abbott, 601 Southwest 3rd, 802 and 807, Texas, 2020. All government power
[11:14.880 --> 11:20.560]  in this country, no matter how well intentioned to rise only from the state and federal constitutions,
[11:20.560 --> 11:26.720]  government power cannot be exercised in conflict with these constitutions, even in a pandemic.
[11:26.720 --> 11:34.800]  Henry Salon Allamode et al. In case you forget, that is the lady with the Salon in doubt,
[11:34.800 --> 11:43.680]  the Salon in Dallas, that was thrown in jail by the district judge there illegally and she
[11:43.680 --> 11:49.920]  should sue the living crap out of him for it because he had no power to hold her in contempt,
[11:49.920 --> 11:55.360]  just as the judge had issued the order she was held in contempt for, had no legitimate power to issue it.
[11:57.600 --> 12:02.000]  They illegally and unconstitutionally tried to force her to close her business
[12:02.000 --> 12:09.040]  and lose it rather than feed her family and none of them, not the governor, not the judges,
[12:09.040 --> 12:16.080]  had any power to do that and the Texas Supreme Court agreed when they said, let her out of jail.
[12:20.080 --> 12:26.560]  Numerous sections and provisions of chapter 418, Texas government code are patently unconstitutional
[12:26.560 --> 12:33.120]  under numerous existing provisions of the Texas Constitution. Not only do these sections and
[12:33.120 --> 12:39.360]  provisions violate the separation of powers clause under article 2, section 1, Texas Constitution,
[12:39.360 --> 12:45.120]  these sections and provisions purport to grant multiple and various powers and authority to the
[12:45.120 --> 12:50.880]  governor and individual local officials, such as county and district judges and other officers of
[12:50.880 --> 12:56.880]  political subdivisions that constitute outright violations of multiple articles and sections
[12:56.880 --> 13:02.480]  of the Texas Constitution, including, but not limited to, Texas Constitution article 1, the
[13:02.480 --> 13:08.160]  Bill of Rights. The powers and authority being granted by these sections and provisions of chapter
[13:08.160 --> 13:13.360]  418 government code are powers and authority delegated and reserved by the Texas Constitution
[13:13.360 --> 13:19.200]  to other departments of state government and specific offices and officers therein.
[13:19.200 --> 13:24.960]  These powers and their related authority cannot be re-delegated or reassigned by the Texas
[13:24.960 --> 13:30.800]  legislature using a statutory scheme such as that perpetrated by these sections and provisions
[13:30.800 --> 13:36.560]  of chapter 418 government code. And for the legislature to even attempt to do so and for
[13:36.560 --> 13:42.560]  those local officials who actually attempt, accept and attempt to will these unconstitutional powers
[13:42.560 --> 13:51.600]  is nothing short of knowingly overt acts of sedition. For example, section 418.012 government
[13:51.600 --> 13:58.000]  code reads, executive orders. Under this chapter, the governor may issue executive orders,
[13:58.000 --> 14:03.920]  proclamations and regulations and amend or rescind them. Executive orders, proclamations
[14:03.920 --> 14:10.320]  and regulations have the force and effect of law. It is readily apparent by the language
[14:10.320 --> 14:15.520]  of this second clause that the Texas legislature has attempted to unconstitutionally delegate
[14:15.520 --> 14:21.520]  its lawmaking power and authority to the office of the governor of Texas in order to unconstitutionally
[14:21.520 --> 14:27.520]  convert any executive orders issued therefrom in the binding public law rather than the
[14:27.520 --> 14:33.360]  constitutionally limited nature intended to the extent of their power and effect. The limited
[14:33.360 --> 14:38.320]  effect being that they are merely internal regulatory rules and directives applicable
[14:38.320 --> 14:44.000]  in binding only upon the offices, officers and employees of the executive branch within
[14:44.000 --> 14:49.680]  our Texas government. This statutory delegation of the lawmaking power is a direct violation
[14:49.680 --> 14:57.040]  of the provisions of article 2, section 1, article 3, sections 1, sections 1 and sections 29 through
[14:57.040 --> 15:03.360]  39. Thus, this statute also constitutes a direct violation of article 1, section 29,
[15:03.360 --> 15:10.720]  Texas Constitution's Bill of Rights. On October 21, 2021, Terrell County Judge Dale
[15:10.720 --> 15:14.960]  Link, or others, and three of the four county commissioners, two with commissioners, Mike
[15:14.960 --> 15:21.920]  Sanchez, Arnold Falcena and Heather Gully, Commissioner Adam Johnson was not present,
[15:21.920 --> 15:29.280]  created and signed a document titled, Resolution 2021-17, Declaration of Local State of Disaster
[15:29.280 --> 15:37.280]  in Order Regarding Invasion, hearing that to refer to as resolution. The resolution enacted
[15:37.280 --> 15:43.440]  by these Terrell County officials is in direct conflict with the Texas Constitution. Anytime
[15:43.440 --> 15:51.360]  a law, ordinance, code or policy violates the provisions set out therein, or I'm sorry, set
[15:51.360 --> 15:56.560]  out in the Texas Constitution. Hang on just a second, folks. It just dawned on me I do not
[15:56.560 --> 16:06.240]  have the caller page up, and if I'm not hearing it go to break, I can't tell if it is or it isn't.
[16:08.720 --> 16:11.040]  All right. All right. I got about 50 seconds. Okay.
[16:14.400 --> 16:19.520]  The resolution, anytime a law, ordinance, code or policy violates the provisions set out in the
[16:19.520 --> 16:26.480]  Texas Constitution, then the Texas Constitution prevails. All else is void as if it never existed.
[16:26.480 --> 16:33.360]  Not voidable at some later point in time, but instantly void ab initio, pursuant Article 1,
[16:33.360 --> 16:39.360]  Section 29 of the Texas Constitution. All right. I'm going to take a quick break. I will continue
[16:39.360 --> 16:44.240]  this on the other side so y'all hang in there. I'm going to go ahead and turn the phones on so
[16:44.240 --> 16:47.680]  y'all can start calling and getting in line on the board because this won't take very long.
[16:48.560 --> 16:54.560]  Calling number 512-646-1984, if you want to call and get in line, we will be right back after the
[16:54.560 --> 17:04.480]  break. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[17:04.480 --> 17:09.440]  except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[17:09.440 --> 17:15.280]  and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[17:15.280 --> 17:20.480]  environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[17:20.480 --> 17:25.760]  adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.760 --> 17:30.160]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[17:30.160 --> 17:36.640]  most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor
[17:36.640 --> 17:43.440]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[17:43.440 --> 17:49.360]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of
[17:49.360 --> 17:55.440]  young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[17:55.440 --> 17:59.920]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[18:01.040 --> 18:05.520]  Are you wondering what this world is coming to and why God isn't stopping it?
[18:05.520 --> 18:11.040]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for
[18:11.040 --> 18:16.000]  Scripture Talk, where Nana and guests study God's Word to find these answers and more.
[18:16.000 --> 18:21.920]  Join us for both verse-by-verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to explain
[18:21.920 --> 18:27.760]  God's plan as well as to provoke unto love and good works. Our first-hour studies are in the
[18:27.760 --> 18:33.440]  book of Matthew. Our second-hour topics vary each week, exploring sound doctrine as well as
[18:33.440 --> 18:40.080]  Christian character development. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5.16. Let your light so shine
[18:40.080 --> 18:44.560]  before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[18:44.560 --> 18:49.840]  We wish to reflect God's light and to be a blessing to all those who have a hearing year.
[18:50.400 --> 18:56.480]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[18:56.480 --> 19:26.320]  for an inspiring and motivating study of the Scriptures.
[19:26.480 --> 19:46.320]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Like I said, calling number is 512-646-1984.
[19:46.880 --> 19:52.320]  If you want to call in and ask some questions or discuss an issue you've got, which I will be doing
[19:52.320 --> 19:57.920]  as soon as I get done reading over this notice. Okay, picking up where we left off.
[19:59.280 --> 20:05.440]  The Texas Constitution is the supreme law of the land within the territorial borders of Texas
[20:05.440 --> 20:11.040]  and it is subordinate only to certain provisions of the 18 specific enumerated powers granted
[20:11.040 --> 20:16.240]  and reserved solely to the federal government that are inherently or specifically stated as being
[20:16.240 --> 20:22.880]  simultaneously applicable to the states. The Texas Constitution is subordinate to nothing else,
[20:23.520 --> 20:29.360]  especially the statutory schemes and machinations of the Texas legislature, the courts, or that
[20:29.360 --> 20:35.840]  of a local political subdivision. All laws flow from and are governed by the Texas Constitution
[20:35.840 --> 20:42.000]  as being the supreme law of our state, having only the aforementioned exception. It should be
[20:42.000 --> 20:47.200]  remembered that the people's individual rights come from our Creator, not any instrument political
[20:47.200 --> 20:53.760]  body or office made and controlled by man. Our rights are secured and protected by the Texas
[20:53.760 --> 20:59.040]  Constitution and our Bill of Rights, but they are neither granted nor bequeathed to the people of
[20:59.040 --> 21:05.280]  Texas by either. The Texas Constitution merely creates the necessary offices and officers of
[21:05.280 --> 21:10.960]  government while providing strictly defined areas of authority and established protections from
[21:10.960 --> 21:17.760]  and limitations upon the exercise of the high powers granted there too. The resolution issued
[21:17.760 --> 21:22.560]  by the Terrell County Commissioner's Court makes presumptions about events that have not yet even
[21:22.560 --> 21:28.640]  occurred rather than any actual demonstrable ongoing state of emergency based upon a specifically
[21:28.640 --> 21:35.280]  identifiable disaster. Even where actual facts are stated such as those involving legal aliens
[21:35.280 --> 21:40.560]  and human trafficking, these same events have been ongoing on the Texas border for more than a
[21:40.560 --> 21:46.560]  century. So why is it only now an issue that constitutes a disaster worthy of declaring a
[21:46.560 --> 21:52.480]  state of emergency? Furthermore, how does this fit into any of the categories specifically listed
[21:52.480 --> 22:01.120]  in the definition of disaster at section 418.0041 to wit? And I have the section listed there.
[22:01.920 --> 22:07.840]  But there are very specific emergencies that are recognized here. Only two of them could in any way
[22:07.840 --> 22:15.840]  be used to support what they're trying to do in this resolution. The problem is is that the
[22:15.840 --> 22:23.040]  two they're trying to use and some of the ones that they have on here are absolutely not consistent
[22:23.040 --> 22:28.000]  with the delegation of authority given in the Texas Constitution to the governor.
[22:29.760 --> 22:35.840]  See there's a problem here with what this statute says. Now I'm not saying that the Texas government
[22:35.840 --> 22:42.960]  doesn't have a legitimate authority to assist the people of Texas in cases of emergency that are
[22:42.960 --> 22:52.720]  listed here, but they can't do it the way they're doing it. Okay? They cannot violate any other part
[22:52.720 --> 22:58.720]  of the Texas Constitution to try and fulfill the power granted them in another part, especially
[22:58.720 --> 23:05.680]  when the part they're violating is the separation of powers and the bill of rights. Okay? They can't
[23:05.680 --> 23:12.720]  violate any part of it to make another part work. And that's what they're doing. And we'll see that
[23:12.720 --> 23:20.080]  as we get through this. However, even within those actual verifiable facts that are stated,
[23:20.080 --> 23:25.040]  the issues specifically named or isolated individual incidents that in and of themselves
[23:25.040 --> 23:33.280]  do not constitute a level of disaster that is simultaneously adversely affecting and endangering
[23:33.280 --> 23:40.000]  every man, woman, and child within any specifically identified widespread area affected by a specifically
[23:40.000 --> 23:46.160]  identified disaster. Now the reason I've got widespread in double quotes here is if you look at
[23:46.160 --> 23:52.640]  the definition of disaster, disaster means the occurrence or imminent threat of widespread or
[23:52.640 --> 24:00.560]  severe damage, injury, or loss of life or property resulting from one or more of the things they've
[24:00.560 --> 24:09.120]  got listed next. Okay? The two that are in there that could potentially apply to what they've got
[24:09.120 --> 24:16.800]  written in this resolution is epidemic and other public calamity. The problem is, like I said,
[24:16.800 --> 24:23.120]  the person they're trying to give the power to exercise in this regard cannot constitutionally
[24:23.120 --> 24:29.680]  exercise it, a county judge. And the way they're exercising it is a violation of the bill of rights,
[24:29.680 --> 24:35.680]  the separation of powers clause, and other parts of the Texas Constitution, which is what I'm getting
[24:35.680 --> 24:43.600]  into, just so everyone's on the same page. The constitutional issue with this definition
[24:43.600 --> 24:48.000]  and the actions being purportedly authorized by the legislature through the statutory enactments
[24:48.000 --> 24:55.760]  within Chapter 418 government code is as follows. Section 418.108, Declaration of Local Disaster
[24:55.760 --> 25:02.160]  subsection 8, except as provided by subsection E, the presiding officer of the governing body
[25:02.160 --> 25:08.160]  of a political subdivision may declare a local state of disaster. The term disaster appears
[25:08.160 --> 25:13.920]  in the Texas Constitution in only three specific articles and sections. Twice in Article 3,
[25:13.920 --> 25:21.920]  Section 62, twice in Article 7, Section 18, and four times in Article 8, Section 2E. The use of
[25:21.920 --> 25:27.920]  the term disaster as used within Article 7 and 8 are direct references back to the use of the term
[25:27.920 --> 25:35.200]  as used in Article 3, Section 62. There is no question that the only recognized form of emergency
[25:35.200 --> 25:42.000]  relating to a disaster that can be found in Article 3, Section 62 is that of periods of
[25:42.000 --> 25:48.240]  emergency resulting from disasters caused by enemy attack. Thus, the problem with the Tarrell
[25:48.240 --> 25:54.640]  County elected official's logic is the Article 3, Section 62 requirement that the disaster be
[25:54.640 --> 26:00.320]  the result of an actual enemy attack. The Texas Constitution does not even mention the term
[26:00.320 --> 26:07.600]  invasion except in two other articles and sections. Article 3, Section 49 relating to state
[26:07.600 --> 26:13.680]  debts and Article 4, Section 7, Governor as Commander in Chief of Military Forces, both of
[26:13.680 --> 26:19.680]  which identify a situation where the United States is in a declared state of war with another nation.
[26:20.560 --> 26:26.720]  And last time I checked, none of the countries the immigrants in double quotes discussed in the
[26:26.720 --> 26:34.960]  resolution are from have been declared an official and current enemy of the United States.
[26:36.080 --> 26:40.320]  The actions of the aforementioned officials of the Tarrell County Commissioners Court can only
[26:40.320 --> 26:45.760]  be described as an effort to institute martial law in Tarrell County. This is a direct violation
[26:45.760 --> 26:51.040]  of Article 1, Section 28 of the Texas Constitution relating to the suspension of laws.
[26:51.840 --> 26:58.800]  To wit, Section 28 of Article 1, suspension of laws, no power of suspending laws in this state
[26:58.800 --> 27:05.120]  shall be exercised except by the legislature. Am I the only person in Texas that sees of the
[27:05.120 --> 27:09.840]  state problem with the logic and actions of my public officials in light of what is written in
[27:09.840 --> 27:18.400]  Article 3, Section 62 of the Texas Constitution. This section outlines strict and meditoy requirements
[27:18.400 --> 27:25.600]  for what must occur in order to declare a disaster, even in the face of an imminent or ongoing enemy
[27:25.600 --> 27:31.440]  attack. And those requirements originate with the legislature and the governor of the state,
[27:31.440 --> 27:37.440]  not the local officials of a political subdivision. In fact, the independent powers specifically
[27:37.440 --> 27:43.840]  granted to the legislature under this section are solely as follows. Subsection A of Article 3,
[27:43.840 --> 27:50.160]  Section 62, the legislature shall have the power and the immediate duty to provide for
[27:50.160 --> 27:55.680]  prompt and temporary succession to the powers and duties of public offices of whatever nature
[27:55.680 --> 28:00.720]  and whether filled by election or appointment, the incumbents of which may become available
[28:00.720 --> 28:07.120]  for carrying on the powers and duties of such offices. Moreover, that section makes it extremely
[28:07.120 --> 28:13.680]  clear that no one, and I mean no one, was given nor has the power to suspend any provision of the
[28:13.680 --> 28:20.560]  Bill of Rights to wit, provided, however, that Article 1 of the Constitution of Texas known
[28:20.560 --> 28:27.120]  as the Bill of Rights shall not be in any manner affected, amended, impaired, suspended, repealed
[28:28.400 --> 28:36.320]  or suspended here by. So even in the face of an enemy attack, the Texas Constitution specifically
[28:36.320 --> 28:42.160]  forbids and prohibits the Texas government from suspending any part of the Bill of Rights.
[28:42.160 --> 28:48.800]  Thus, by default, they cannot suspend my individual rights or those of any other person within the
[28:48.800 --> 28:54.720]  entire state of Texas. The provisions I have disclosed here in thus far are enough to prove
[28:54.720 --> 29:00.720]  that Governor Abbott's executive orders during the demonstrably fictitious COVID pandemic slash
[29:00.720 --> 29:06.800]  epidemic were blatantly unconstitutional and no less is true of many of the provisions codified
[29:06.800 --> 29:11.280]  in Chapter 480 of the government code and numerous other Texas codes and statutes.
[29:12.320 --> 29:18.000]  That's as far as I've gotten on the rewrite of this. The document I received is actually eight
[29:18.000 --> 29:26.640]  pages. This is almost a full five pages in my rewritten version of it. The individual that
[29:26.640 --> 29:33.040]  wrote this and sent it to me has made several additional things to it according to a phone
[29:33.040 --> 29:37.360]  call we shared earlier. So there's going to be some other stuff I have to incorporate this from
[29:37.360 --> 29:45.120]  their new version, but I'm going to finish the version I've got and try to get it worded and
[29:45.840 --> 29:52.320]  massaged into an arguable, arguable presentation that will hold legal and constitutional water.
[29:52.320 --> 29:58.880]  So that's that. Alright folks, I got callers on the board. We'll be right back after this.
[30:22.640 --> 30:27.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.440 --> 30:33.520]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:33.520 --> 30:38.720]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.720 --> 30:44.720]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.320 --> 30:50.720]  Feeling tired, sick, or blue? A bit of sun exposure can make you feel like a million
[30:50.720 --> 30:55.760]  bucks and it won't cost you a dime. Ten or fifteen minutes in the sun without sunscreen helps your
[30:55.760 --> 31:01.520]  body produce its daily vitamin D requirement. Vitamin D may prevent type 1 diabetes and decrease
[31:01.520 --> 31:06.960]  your risk of breast, colon, and prostate cancer. The sun can also help you get more Zs by stimulating
[31:06.960 --> 31:11.440]  production of melanin, the hormone that promotes better sleep. And when you're out of sorts,
[31:11.440 --> 31:15.840]  the sun can boost your body's production of endorphins and serotonin, the brain chemicals
[31:15.840 --> 31:20.960]  that lift your mood. So be sure to make every day a Sunday. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[31:20.960 --> 31:23.760]  more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:31.600 --> 31:37.040]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:37.040 --> 31:41.840]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers have
[31:41.840 --> 31:46.400]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given
[31:46.400 --> 31:50.800]  their lives. And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[31:50.800 --> 31:54.240]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[31:54.240 --> 31:59.200]  pilot. I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to
[31:59.200 --> 32:06.320]  RememberBuilding7.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.320 --> 32:10.080]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society. If we, the people, are ever going to
[32:10.080 --> 32:14.320]  have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:14.320 --> 32:17.760]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private
[32:17.760 --> 32:22.080]  capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the
[32:22.080 --> 32:25.920]  least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due
[32:25.920 --> 32:30.000]  process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put
[32:30.000 --> 32:33.520]  together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[32:33.520 --> 32:37.680]  due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this
[32:37.680 --> 32:42.400]  invaluable material by going to rulelawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[32:42.400 --> 32:46.320]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.320 --> 32:50.800]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful
[32:50.800 --> 32:54.160]  resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[32:54.160 --> 32:59.760]  rulelawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.760 --> 33:07.440]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:30.000 --> 33:48.320]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:49.200 --> 33:54.640]  All right, now we've got this far. Let's see who we got on the board. First up appears to be
[33:54.640 --> 34:03.520]  Barrett in Colorado. Barrett, what can we do for you? All right, let's try it again.
[34:04.800 --> 34:11.360]  Barrett disappeared. All right, well hopefully Barrett will get back up on the board right now
[34:11.360 --> 34:15.120]  then. Let's go ahead and see if we can take Trey in Colorado. Trey, what can we do for you?
[34:16.480 --> 34:20.000]  Hey there, Mr. Trey. How are you doing, sir? I'm doing fine. How's your day?
[34:20.000 --> 34:27.120]  Oh, it's going well, sir. I really liked what you just read there. Now, is that something that
[34:27.120 --> 34:34.800]  you've written yourself? Well, what I was reading was my rewrite of what the other person provided,
[34:34.800 --> 34:43.120]  yes. Okay, is there any way I could get a hold of something like that because I could really use
[34:43.120 --> 34:49.120]  that here in Colorado to deal with these ridiculous ordinance? Yeah, I mean like I say, this is going
[34:49.120 --> 34:53.760]  to be an open letter sent to a list of public officials, including the governor of Texas.
[34:53.760 --> 34:58.000]  So once we get it all done, I'll be happy to send you a copy out if you'll just send me an email.
[34:59.280 --> 35:04.560]  Yes, sir. Yes, I talked to you several weeks ago and I've been talking with Brett and Randy
[35:04.560 --> 35:12.480]  there also and about these county ordinance systems. I'm trying to, literally, I had court this past
[35:12.480 --> 35:22.800]  Thursday and literally the county attorney looks at me and says, if you plead guilty,
[35:23.760 --> 35:30.960]  I can get you at least a week to vacate the premises. I got 20 acres of land and I think
[35:30.960 --> 35:36.160]  you might remember I told you, I'm living on it with me and my family in a fifth wheel.
[35:36.160 --> 35:42.960]  Right. And they're trying to tell me that the petition says that I'm illegally camping.
[35:45.280 --> 35:53.440]  It literally says camping on his own property for 60 days or more or for greater than 60 days.
[35:53.440 --> 35:58.480]  That's what the, in its county. Yeah, they have absolutely no legitimate authority to tell a
[35:58.480 --> 36:03.360]  landowner how they have to live on their own property. They absolutely don't. They like
[36:03.360 --> 36:07.840]  to think they do, but they don't. And the fact that they're basing it upon an ordinance that by
[36:07.840 --> 36:12.800]  the constitution of the state itself cannot be binding public law, you would think these
[36:12.800 --> 36:19.440]  ridiculous people would learn to understand this. Okay. It's like the judge was just taking
[36:19.440 --> 36:25.040]  cues from the county attorney. Well, that's exactly what she was doing. That's exactly
[36:25.040 --> 36:30.480]  what these judges do. And they wanted me, they, you know, oh, you want to go talk to him? No,
[36:30.480 --> 36:36.400]  I'm not. I'm so new to this. I was like, okay, I'll go talk to him, I guess. And I talked to him
[36:36.400 --> 36:41.200]  and thankfully, you know, Colorado, we have sunshine laws. So I recorded all of this audio
[36:41.200 --> 36:49.760]  as well as video to record and devices, took a Brett's advice on that. And, and I literally got
[36:49.760 --> 36:57.280]  the attorney on video and audio saying, the county attorney saying, you're camping, you're
[36:57.280 --> 37:02.480]  illegally camping on your property. And then he walks away after I started showing him some things
[37:02.480 --> 37:06.880]  to the law and he comes back and he goes, well, I actually don't know if he admitted. He said,
[37:06.880 --> 37:10.640]  I actually don't know if you're actually camping on your property. I've never seen him before.
[37:11.200 --> 37:17.680]  So right there, I just had the man admit to hearsay. Well, but wait a minute. My question is,
[37:17.680 --> 37:22.320]  is who is in these court appearances? Is it you, the judge and the prosecutor, or are there
[37:22.320 --> 37:28.480]  any witnesses there? There were, there were a bunch of people in the other people getting
[37:28.480 --> 37:34.960]  railroaded by the judge. And yeah, but who was the prosecutor attempting to put forth as a witness
[37:34.960 --> 37:43.120]  in your case? No, no one. He didn't. Okay. The prosecutor cannot enter evidence of his own accord.
[37:43.120 --> 37:50.080]  He cannot testify as to any fact in the case. Anything he says is absolute garbage,
[37:50.080 --> 38:00.480]  inadmissible crap. He cannot introduce that stuff himself unless you objection your honor.
[38:00.480 --> 38:07.120]  Her rule 602, the attorney cannot testify. And she said he's not testified, overruled.
[38:10.960 --> 38:17.680]  Is he giving you facts relative to this case or pertinent to this case for which there is no
[38:17.680 --> 38:22.160]  witness that has provided testimony to this court as to those facts?
[38:24.720 --> 38:28.400]  As far as I know, what happened was somebody called and complained.
[38:29.040 --> 38:31.760]  No, no, no. That's what you need to say to the judge.
[38:32.720 --> 38:38.080]  Okay. Okay. Because when this attorney is speaking and stating facts and the judge is
[38:38.080 --> 38:43.680]  taking that under advisement to make a decision, he is testifying. There's no way around that.
[38:43.680 --> 38:53.120]  Right. Exactly. So I'm just, you know, I guess I'm sorry. I got a lot of them on mind. The one
[38:53.120 --> 38:58.480]  thing that frustrates me the most that I worry about, I can just see the corruption. The person
[38:58.480 --> 39:03.760]  who was the bailiff there, she's a deputy for the county. She's the one who originally came and
[39:03.760 --> 39:07.440]  was like, okay, you're camping and all that stuff. So no, ma'am, I'm not. You know, they'll have
[39:07.440 --> 39:12.560]  jurisdiction, et cetera. And then another, finally, another deputy was sent out and he's the one
[39:12.560 --> 39:18.800]  who brought citation. Like a couple of weeks later, he actually handed me citation, which are a few
[39:18.800 --> 39:27.440]  signed and signed. And so the thing that, I mean, just looking at the way they're all taking,
[39:27.440 --> 39:33.040]  here's from this attorney, I mean, sometimes I kind of worry about them trying to use my
[39:33.040 --> 39:37.440]  family, my little children as leverage or something like that against me. Well, they're
[39:37.440 --> 39:41.280]  liable to try anything if they figure they're going to lose. As long as they think they've
[39:41.280 --> 39:45.840]  got the upper hand, they won't go that route. But the moment they feel like they stand a chance
[39:45.840 --> 39:49.360]  of losing, you better expect every dirty, underhanded trick they can throw at you.
[39:50.560 --> 39:55.280]  Right. I'm just curious if there's any way that I can make sure that my family is
[39:55.280 --> 40:01.040]  secure and safe, you know. Well, make sure they're not in the state if, if that you start getting
[40:01.040 --> 40:09.840]  the upper hand. Oh, that would be near impossible. That's the only problem because I want to barge
[40:09.840 --> 40:16.480]  Reed's attorney. And I found out that he's actually, he's actually at a practice in another
[40:16.480 --> 40:21.680]  county. He gave me his business card. He doesn't even own the practice. He works for another
[40:21.680 --> 40:26.240]  practice in another county. Because I know if I barger even for the, you know, for this county
[40:26.240 --> 40:30.880]  or as a county attorney, it hasn't done the insurance, he doesn't care if it goes up,
[40:30.880 --> 40:36.400]  because taxpayers pay it. But oh, wait, that barger even is also going to hit him at that
[40:36.400 --> 40:43.360]  practice. Well, now wait a minute. Here's the thing. In Texas, now are they prosecuting you
[40:43.360 --> 40:51.120]  for a civil administrative offense or a criminal offense? How's this classified? County ordinance.
[40:51.760 --> 40:58.000]  Yeah, but that doesn't, I know what they're using, but how is it classified, criminal or civil?
[40:59.440 --> 41:01.760]  As far as I understood, I asked and they said it was civil.
[41:01.760 --> 41:07.040]  But then it's administrative. If it's civil, it's administrative.
[41:08.800 --> 41:14.080]  Right. So yeah, they have no administrative authority over private property.
[41:17.280 --> 41:21.760]  In order to have a claim in a straight up, not administrative civil suit, they would have to
[41:21.760 --> 41:26.320]  have standing to bring it, which means they would have to demonstrate a harm, which they can't do.
[41:26.320 --> 41:32.800]  No. I don't even have any neighbors that can even see my property.
[41:34.400 --> 41:41.920]  All the land around me is all vacant. I mean, it's just crazy. But yeah,
[41:41.920 --> 41:46.800]  I mean, so I was thinking about trying to do, we have pre-trial December 16th and I want to get as
[41:46.800 --> 41:52.000]  much done for that as I can. And I was hoping I could do, I guess, discovery and try and find
[41:52.000 --> 42:00.720]  out if there's any actual complaints filled out. Okay. That should be part of the record
[42:00.720 --> 42:05.600]  they bring to court. You can just tell the judge, judge, I've never been served with a copy of this
[42:05.600 --> 42:12.720]  so-called complaint. Where is it? Right. And it would have to be an affidavit, correct?
[42:14.000 --> 42:17.760]  Yeah, it would have to be an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury and it would have to be
[42:17.760 --> 42:22.160]  somebody appearing in court to testify to its veracity because it cannot stand on its own two feet
[42:22.160 --> 42:27.680]  without that. No one testifies to an affidavit. The affidavit's worthless.
[42:30.080 --> 42:35.920]  Yes, sir. And now the police, the deputies, could they fill out an affidavit for it? I mean,
[42:35.920 --> 42:40.880]  even though obviously I haven't harmed them or anything. The deputies don't have personal first
[42:40.880 --> 42:46.320]  hand knowledge of anything. They came out and accused you of something. Did they ask you how
[42:46.320 --> 42:53.520]  long you'd been there? No, that's funny because it says, it actually says, I hadn't even been
[42:53.520 --> 42:59.600]  living there yet whenever they gave me that. I just had my camper there. Yeah, see, that's
[42:59.600 --> 43:05.120]  what I'm saying. They can't actually testify to anything. They have no personal knowledge of
[43:05.120 --> 43:17.120]  anything. Can your trailer be seen from a public road? From the road and we're a landowner's
[43:17.120 --> 43:22.320]  association from the dirt road. It can be seen. We're going to be putting up a fin
[43:22.320 --> 43:28.960]  for that very reason, just to get off our backs, get off our case. Well, the only way that would
[43:28.960 --> 43:34.560]  actually help you though is if they couldn't go at any point on that road and see onto your property.
[43:34.560 --> 43:39.760]  You'd have to have a fence that basically covered the whole thing. Yeah, we got a 10 foot fence that
[43:39.760 --> 43:43.600]  we're going to be putting in. Once it's in, it'll be at least 10 feet high. It won't be able to see
[43:43.600 --> 43:49.280]  that. Yeah, but it's not just an issue of pie. It would have to be long enough that it would exceed
[43:49.280 --> 43:54.400]  the length of the road wherever they could be on the road or walk to the end of the property line
[43:54.400 --> 43:58.880]  and peer around. You get what I'm saying? They would trespass to look. Let me put it that way.
[43:58.880 --> 44:04.960]  Hang on just a second. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without
[44:04.960 --> 44:11.360]  an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show
[44:11.360 --> 44:18.880]  you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.880 --> 44:24.160]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our
[44:24.160 --> 44:30.800]  step by step course. And now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[44:30.800 --> 44:37.040]  with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[44:37.040 --> 44:43.120]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.120 --> 44:49.360]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.360 --> 44:56.240]  prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.240 --> 45:03.840]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. I love logos. Without the shows on this network,
[45:03.840 --> 45:08.240]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going
[45:08.240 --> 45:13.920]  back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network
[45:13.920 --> 45:18.000]  on the air. And I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really
[45:18.000 --> 45:23.200]  don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[45:23.200 --> 45:28.240]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[45:28.240 --> 45:33.120]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies. Now,
[45:33.120 --> 45:40.160]  go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything
[45:40.160 --> 45:46.640]  from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do I have to do
[45:46.640 --> 45:53.120]  anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving
[45:53.120 --> 45:59.520]  without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome.
[45:59.520 --> 46:21.040]  Happy holidays, logos. All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling
[46:21.040 --> 46:29.200]  number 512-646-1984. We are still on with Trey in Colorado. All right. Anyway, with Trey,
[46:29.200 --> 46:35.200]  what I was saying is you would have to basically cover your entire road frontage and down whatever
[46:35.200 --> 46:39.520]  other property there is. If you don't completely enclose it, they'll trespass to do it is what I'm
[46:39.520 --> 46:45.440]  saying. All right. Whether it's on your property or someone next to you, they'll do it if they
[46:45.440 --> 46:51.280]  think they can get money out of it when it's all said and done. So, whatever you do, make sure you
[46:51.280 --> 46:56.400]  properly post your property according to Colorado law as private. And if you put a gate up,
[46:56.400 --> 47:04.000]  they can't enter your gate without a warrant. Excellent. Yep. All those things are in plan.
[47:04.000 --> 47:11.360]  We got about 750 feet of fence and we're about to put up. So, the whole road frontage is going
[47:11.360 --> 47:21.200]  to cover that. Okay. One more question for you about another kind of way to get them off my case,
[47:21.200 --> 47:26.960]  kind of strike back. I looked at the actual, because you had sent me some information about
[47:26.960 --> 47:31.200]  this ordinances, which I greatly appreciate. And I was going through that. And in there,
[47:31.200 --> 47:36.480]  in the land use regulation for Teller County, there's land use regulations. And then it says,
[47:36.480 --> 47:42.320]  you know, within that is ordinance number 20, which is what they're citing. Well, when you go
[47:42.320 --> 47:55.440]  down to definition of land use regulation, it says that any camper or fifth wheel that is at least
[47:55.440 --> 48:01.920]  eight feet wide, 40 feet or greater in length, which might be both of those. It's 42 feet long
[48:01.920 --> 48:12.880]  and eight feet wide. And then it says, or what's open has 300, at least 320 square feet. And also,
[48:12.880 --> 48:17.280]  it says it needs to have a permanent steel chassis, which mine has, obviously, just like all of them
[48:17.280 --> 48:26.000]  do, and needs to have, can go in and out of road mode. It says that that is no longer classified
[48:26.000 --> 48:35.360]  as a mobile home. It is now, or as a RV or camper, and is now classified as an actual
[48:37.520 --> 48:42.080]  modular home or as like a permanent residence. Anyways, they actually...
[48:42.080 --> 48:48.400]  Yeah. And see, that's, that's what I'm saying. These deputies cannot testify as to any facts
[48:48.400 --> 48:54.400]  relative to what your home is or isn't. You see what I'm saying? They don't know what
[48:54.400 --> 48:58.880]  its capabilities are. They haven't measured it. They haven't used, compared it against these,
[48:58.880 --> 49:03.520]  this part of the ordinance that you're talking about, et cetera, et cetera. So here's what you do
[49:03.520 --> 49:11.920]  with that. You file a motion to dismiss, and you cite that part of the regulation in it,
[49:11.920 --> 49:16.640]  along with the fact that the, or I'm sorry, the ordinance, that the ordinance itself is
[49:16.640 --> 49:22.480]  unconstitutional and that it purports to act as binding public law upon private property and
[49:22.480 --> 49:28.960]  persons, which it cannot do without violating the state constitution. You give them the chance
[49:28.960 --> 49:39.520]  to dismiss the case. Give them 30 days to do that in that document. Okay? Okay. Make sure you
[49:39.520 --> 49:46.400]  file a second motion asking for a motion's hearing on that motion to dismiss.
[49:46.400 --> 49:57.520]  Yes. Okay. Okay. Now, if they fail or refuse, start writing up a lawsuit for malicious prosecution
[49:57.520 --> 50:03.360]  against the deputies, the attorney, because the attorney is not an elected prosecutor.
[50:03.920 --> 50:11.280]  Therefore, they do not have immunity as a prosecutor. You get me?
[50:11.280 --> 50:18.480]  Yes. Sue the living crap out of the attorney for malicious prosecution. Sue his law firm
[50:19.120 --> 50:25.600]  on top of that. Didn't find out whether or not this so-called judge is acting in an actual
[50:25.600 --> 50:32.400]  judicial capacity or as in an administrative capacity via being an administrative judge.
[50:33.120 --> 50:38.960]  If they're administrative, they also have no immunity. Add them to the lawsuit.
[50:38.960 --> 50:43.760]  How would I do that now? How would I find out if she's the administrative?
[50:44.640 --> 50:50.480]  Well, you find out what authority she is sitting in that position. You find out what the powers of
[50:50.480 --> 50:57.680]  that position are, where that authority comes from. If it's not judicial, she does not have immunity
[50:58.880 --> 51:05.040]  because anything that's non-judicial is administrative and administrative is ministerial.
[51:05.040 --> 51:13.120]  Ministerial, no immunity. Could I ask the county clerk that or that?
[51:13.120 --> 51:21.040]  You can ask, but you can't trust the answer. You need to find the actual law or ordinance
[51:21.040 --> 51:29.760]  that creates that position and set its powers and duties. Okay. Okay. Excellent. Now, here's the thing.
[51:29.760 --> 51:38.160]  Unless the Colorado Constitution specifically authorizes counties to appoint judges and create
[51:38.160 --> 51:44.320]  judge positions that are actually judicial, if her position was created by ordinance,
[51:44.320 --> 51:47.120]  it's 100% administrative. It can't be anything else.
[51:49.760 --> 51:55.360]  Okay. Okay. Excellent. Excellent. I think I did see something about that. You know,
[51:55.360 --> 52:02.160]  there's different classes of counties in Colorado and we're a class D county.
[52:03.040 --> 52:07.040]  And I thought it said in there that basically there's one county judge who's elected
[52:07.760 --> 52:15.840]  and then I think he can set up judges underneath them. Yeah, but the thing is that judges underneath
[52:15.840 --> 52:22.960]  them will most likely, depending, here's the thing. It doesn't matter if they're calling
[52:22.960 --> 52:28.640]  her a judge or not and that she's actually beneath the county judge and that you have appellate powers
[52:28.640 --> 52:36.400]  from her administrative court to an actual judicial court. The problem is her ignoring the law
[52:37.120 --> 52:44.560]  to further a malicious prosecution. If she's doing that administratively, she has no immunity.
[52:44.560 --> 52:50.240]  Even though you've got an appealable error from what she's doing, she has no immunity from a
[52:50.240 --> 53:01.440]  malicious prosecution suit. Right. Okay. All right. And I, okay. She did not get all my motions.
[53:01.440 --> 53:07.280]  I had dismissed, you know, motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
[53:08.000 --> 53:13.360]  And I had my elements in there. I had that. I had a special appearance. Did you have a
[53:13.360 --> 53:20.480]  reference to the section of the ordinance you just told me about? About the actual dwelling and the
[53:20.480 --> 53:25.600]  size. Right. I didn't have that in there. I did not have that in there. File an amended one.
[53:27.120 --> 53:31.600]  Okay. Okay. Another amended subject matter jurisdiction. Correct.
[53:32.560 --> 53:38.960]  Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction amended to include that part of
[53:38.960 --> 53:46.560]  that ordinance specification. Do I put it on the same page as the old one? Just like use the old
[53:46.560 --> 53:51.600]  one and write amended and then add that in? Or you just put amended on the end of the title
[53:51.600 --> 53:56.560]  and then insert your new paragraph in there, arguing the section out of the ordinances.
[53:57.520 --> 54:06.480]  And also that even if this section were not applicable, the ordinance would still be unconstitutional
[54:06.480 --> 54:12.640]  as it is being used to substitute for binding public law, which you cannot do under section
[54:12.640 --> 54:21.120]  blah, blah, blah of the Colorado Constitution. Okay. Oh man. Is there any way to get a recording
[54:21.120 --> 54:27.360]  at this? Whenever it gets it edited and posted, other than that, no. You have to wait till she
[54:27.360 --> 54:33.760]  gets that done. I'd love to write all this down. But see, this is why when I call him the shows
[54:33.760 --> 54:39.680]  like this, I use my cell phone and I have an app on my phone that records both sides of the conversation.
[54:41.600 --> 54:46.080]  And if you want to call in, I would highly recommend you get an app like that for your phone.
[54:46.080 --> 54:50.160]  So if you call from there, then you'll have a recording of what we're talking about right now
[54:51.600 --> 54:58.400]  or you would have that way. Yes, sir. Okay. Is there any, do you have any documents like this
[54:58.400 --> 55:04.320]  already? I have been on. Not specific to the subject you're going to be dealing with in that
[55:04.320 --> 55:13.360]  ordinance. No. Okay. All right. But when the judge, when the judge denies that motion, she has set
[55:13.360 --> 55:19.520]  herself up for failure right there. She set her own self up to be sued because guaranteed she did
[55:19.520 --> 55:26.160]  not bother to read it. Had she read it and saw that section in there and ignored it, now you've
[55:26.160 --> 55:32.320]  got her by the short and curlies because she has completely ignored the law in order to steal money.
[55:33.520 --> 55:37.280]  Not only can you sue her for that, you can get her thrown out of office.
[55:39.680 --> 55:46.880]  Excellent. I just want to say, and I saw so many four suckers clearly getting
[55:47.760 --> 55:53.520]  posed over this same thing. And, you know, I mean, it's just ridiculous. And they were just,
[55:53.520 --> 56:00.240]  you know, paying the fine. Here's the other thing then. Go back down to the court and get a list of
[56:00.240 --> 56:05.120]  all the cases and the contact information for the individuals that were in court on the same day you
[56:05.120 --> 56:13.440]  were there for the same issue. Get in touch with them and find out how many of them are in your
[56:13.440 --> 56:19.280]  predicament. Exactly. And whether or not they also have the same exception you do. Exactly.
[56:19.280 --> 56:25.440]  And then find out whether or not they ever made any admissions about how long they'd been there,
[56:25.440 --> 56:29.440]  what they were staying in, et cetera, et cetera, before they ever got the ticket.
[56:32.240 --> 56:37.760]  Okay. Okay. And then all of you band together and now your lawsuit's a whole lot bigger.
[56:39.280 --> 56:46.240]  Yeah, because you could show a pattern of abuse by this judge, this attorney, and these deputies.
[56:46.240 --> 56:53.120]  Yes. Yeah, that's one guy. I've got 90 acres been here. His family's been here since the late 1800
[56:53.120 --> 57:00.000]  and he's absolutely just getting railroaded and he's worn out. He's an older guy. He's had me
[57:00.000 --> 57:05.600]  replaced myself. So back to that, man. Well, this might be a way you can help yourself and
[57:05.600 --> 57:10.400]  them all at the same time and put a stop to this crap for good. Sir, I'm not, I'm, yeah, I don't,
[57:10.400 --> 57:14.320]  I don't, I don't want to just do this for me and mine. I want to do it for others as well. I really
[57:14.320 --> 57:19.760]  have. I really didn't mean that. Yeah. And that, that to me, that in my opinion is one of the better
[57:19.760 --> 57:26.160]  ways to do it. Go get a list of those people and start contacting them. All right. You could
[57:26.160 --> 57:31.440]  probably even go to the clerk of the court and say you want to, you want a list of all the cases
[57:31.440 --> 57:41.920]  relative to this specific ordinance for the entire year. Oh, excellent. Oh, that's good. Okay. Yeah,
[57:41.920 --> 57:49.680]  I'm writing that down. Yeah. All right. Yeah. Well, I don't want to hold anybody else. No,
[57:49.680 --> 57:55.520]  Eddie. Uh, I just, I had to get in here. I appreciate y'all so much. Yes, sir. Get someone
[57:55.520 --> 58:01.040]  else. All right. All right. You have a great night. Thanks for calling. All right. Barrett and
[58:01.040 --> 58:07.120]  Jason, I see you on the board. I have got to take a break here top of the hour, but I will get to
[58:07.120 --> 58:12.560]  Barrett when we get back and then Jason after that. So you gentlemen, please hang on and we will
[58:12.560 --> 58:17.520]  take your call. In the meantime, I want to say thank you to everyone out there listening and
[58:17.520 --> 58:23.760]  for keeping the show going. I do apologize for my lack of appearance from time to time.
[58:24.800 --> 58:30.160]  Things are just, you know, very hectic around here for me and it's just me doing everything
[58:30.160 --> 58:37.520]  between all the stuff I've got in my daily duties to my dog. It's very time consuming.
[58:37.520 --> 58:41.600]  But anyhow, folks, y'all hang on and we will be right back after this break.
[58:50.160 --> 58:53.280]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:53.840 --> 58:57.600]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.600 --> 59:04.240]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the
[59:04.240 --> 59:11.200]  profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is
[59:11.200 --> 59:17.520]  extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.160 --> 59:23.840]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into
[59:23.840 --> 59:29.360]  the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would
[59:29.360 --> 59:35.120]  like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact
[59:35.120 --> 59:45.360]  study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online
[59:45.360 --> 59:53.200]  at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[59:53.840 --> 59:56.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:13.040]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold, $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:13.040 --> 01:00:20.800]  silver, $16.45 an ounce, copper, $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude, $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:29.120]  Brent crude, $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.120 --> 01:00:45.920]  Ethereum, $227.26, XRP, Ripple, $0.33, Litecoin, $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:45.920 --> 01:00:52.480]  During history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.480 --> 01:00:57.440]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.440 --> 01:01:00.320]  killing 10 and injuring 40. Today in history.
[01:01:04.560 --> 01:01:09.520]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing HEPA to
[01:01:09.520 --> 01:01:14.160]  tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin,
[01:01:14.160 --> 01:01:18.160]  San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:18.160 --> 01:01:22.720]  new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:01:22.720 --> 01:01:27.840]  to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier
[01:01:27.840 --> 01:01:32.480]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:37.120]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:01:37.120 --> 01:01:42.160]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.160 --> 01:01:48.400]  in Texas, and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well
[01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:54.960]  as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso. Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also
[01:01:54.960 --> 01:01:59.680]  stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution
[01:01:59.680 --> 01:02:05.120]  of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball,
[01:02:05.120 --> 01:02:09.840]  an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly
[01:02:09.840 --> 01:02:14.240]  changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if
[01:02:14.240 --> 01:02:23.600]  someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane
[01:02:23.600 --> 01:02:28.640]  University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind
[01:02:28.640 --> 01:02:34.720]  in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded
[01:02:34.720 --> 01:02:39.680]  with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the
[01:02:39.680 --> 01:02:45.920]  university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the
[01:02:45.920 --> 01:02:54.720]  purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This was Brook Roddy with
[01:02:54.720 --> 01:03:10.560]  your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:24.720 --> 01:03:32.560]  Because you can't starve a foward and you can't make a run, those wooden-mole boys raise
[01:03:32.560 --> 01:03:41.760]  own shot guns. We say, craze, we say, ma'am, if you ain't into that, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:41.760 --> 01:03:52.800]  We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too. Ain't too many things these old boys can't do.
[01:03:52.800 --> 01:04:11.840]  The growth of the old maters and homemade wine and the country boy can't survive, the country folks can't survive.
[01:04:11.840 --> 01:04:20.400]  But don't you can't starve a foward and you can't make a run, those wooden-mole boys raise own shot guns.
[01:04:20.400 --> 01:04:26.640]  We say, craze, we say, ma'am, if you ain't into that, we don't give a damn.
[01:04:31.280 --> 01:04:35.360]  Hello, Jason. Yes, sir. All right, what can we do for you?
[01:04:36.320 --> 01:04:41.440]  Oh, yeah, I had sent you an email. I had a ticket that I was...
[01:04:41.440 --> 01:04:46.160]  Yes, I saw the email and I have a couple of questions. I was hoping you would call in
[01:04:46.160 --> 01:04:52.960]  tonight because I have some questions for you. Okay. All right. First off, one of the things
[01:04:52.960 --> 01:05:01.520]  you say in this email is that you are seeking qualifications of a judge as required by 4 USC
[01:05:01.520 --> 01:05:07.840]  101. Are you in federal court? No. Then why are you citing federal law?
[01:05:07.840 --> 01:05:16.960]  It does follow federal law, does it not? No. Federal law has absolutely no application
[01:05:16.960 --> 01:05:21.120]  within the territorial boundaries of any state except where that law is related to
[01:05:21.120 --> 01:05:27.520]  one of the 18 specific enumerated powers of government and is a power that is itself
[01:05:27.520 --> 01:05:35.280]  specifically related to a state. Okay. Who qualifies the judges that sit
[01:05:35.280 --> 01:05:40.960]  in state courts? The federal government or the state government? State government.
[01:05:41.680 --> 01:05:46.720]  And where is the oath of office required to be taken by an officer of state government?
[01:05:46.720 --> 01:05:52.080]  The federal constitution, federal law or state law or the state constitution?
[01:05:52.080 --> 01:06:03.360]  State law. Or state constitution. Okay. So why are you citing federal law as an argument?
[01:06:06.720 --> 01:06:11.360]  I actually didn't know any better. Okay. Well, now that we've got that out of the way,
[01:06:13.120 --> 01:06:17.040]  let's see. There was something else that you had in here. You cited federal law
[01:06:17.040 --> 01:06:22.960]  and everything. You didn't cite one state law whatsoever. What state are you actually in fighting
[01:06:22.960 --> 01:06:34.560]  this case, by the way? Don't say confusion. I'm in Texas. You're in Texas? Yes. Okay. Then
[01:06:35.280 --> 01:06:42.400]  have you not been to my legal blog? I just found you not too long ago, actually. Okay.
[01:06:42.400 --> 01:06:49.520]  What's the charge? Speeding. Okay. Then you definitely want to go to my legal blog because
[01:06:49.520 --> 01:06:54.480]  there are at least a dozen articles on my legal blog dealing with speeding in the state of Texas.
[01:06:55.680 --> 01:06:59.920]  Okay. Okay. I did contact Randy when I first
[01:06:59.920 --> 01:07:07.040]  came across John's radio station and he had sent me the document that you have about the
[01:07:07.040 --> 01:07:14.080]  transportation code, which really got me digging into it and other Texas codes as well.
[01:07:16.720 --> 01:07:23.040]  I like your document. I know what they mean, but I don't know what they mean. It's a different story.
[01:07:27.440 --> 01:07:30.640]  But what I'm cutting down to is she asked a lot of the right questions.
[01:07:31.600 --> 01:07:36.640]  Then he said, well, it's a crime because the transportation code is part of the penal code
[01:07:36.640 --> 01:07:43.200]  and I said, I kind of got... Well, the judge is an idiot. That's absolutely not true. Absolutely
[01:07:43.200 --> 01:07:49.840]  not true. Yeah. Not only that, the penal code shoots down the fact that there's such an offense
[01:07:49.840 --> 01:07:58.400]  in Texas as speeding. 1.03 Texas penal code specifically says that if it is not specifically
[01:07:58.400 --> 01:08:04.560]  stated in the statute as being defined as a crime, it is not defined as an offense.
[01:08:04.560 --> 01:08:10.960]  It's not an offense and nowhere does Texas law define speeding as an offense. Absolutely nowhere.
[01:08:10.960 --> 01:08:19.360]  It doesn't even infer that it's an offense. The term offense and misdemeanor never exist
[01:08:19.360 --> 01:08:24.000]  within the code in relation to the term speed or speeding ever.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:30.240]  There is absolutely no such offense in Texas law. Never has been.
[01:08:30.240 --> 01:08:37.280]  But I'm going to email you a document. Had I known you were in Texas, if you're going to call
[01:08:37.280 --> 01:08:43.280]  shows like this or email shows like this, always start with the facts. 1. Where are you? So we
[01:08:43.280 --> 01:08:49.200]  know what law we're dealing with. Had you done that, I would have sent you this motion before you
[01:08:49.200 --> 01:08:53.040]  even had to worry about calling in. You could have read it and been prepared to talk about it
[01:08:53.040 --> 01:08:57.840]  tonight and then we'd have gotten somewhere. But as it is right now, I'm going to email this to you
[01:08:57.840 --> 01:09:05.200]  when I get on my next break. Okay. This motion is the only thing that you should need to file
[01:09:05.200 --> 01:09:14.560]  other than a motion requesting a hearing on this motion when you file it. Okay. And remember,
[01:09:14.560 --> 01:09:20.000]  all you have to do, you can get a template for a motion requesting a motion's hearing
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:25.280]  off the internet for Texas very easily. All you have to do is call the clerk of the court
[01:09:25.280 --> 01:09:31.040]  and get three different dates when the court is in session and open for public business.
[01:09:31.840 --> 01:09:37.520]  And you can use any of those three days to schedule a motion hearing. Pick one of them,
[01:09:38.880 --> 01:09:45.840]  but make sure it's at least 10 days, no less than 10 days from the date that you file the motion.
[01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:53.120]  Okay. Okay. And those days are not calendar days. They are business dates. Business days.
[01:09:53.120 --> 01:10:00.480]  Okay. So weekends and holidays and the day you file are not to be counted.
[01:10:02.240 --> 01:10:09.200]  Got it. Okay. So make sure that you do it at least 10 business days from the date you file it
[01:10:09.920 --> 01:10:18.400]  and get three dates after that date, dates and times. Then pick one and put that in your motion
[01:10:18.400 --> 01:10:26.960]  requesting a hearing on the motion you just filed and then file that. Okay. Got it. All right.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:32.800]  And then the court is going, at that point, going to be required to notify you of the setting of
[01:10:32.800 --> 01:10:37.680]  the motion's hearing. In which case, when you go in there, you better have read and studied the
[01:10:37.680 --> 01:10:43.680]  motion I'm sending you in depth. You better be able to make every argument off the top of your head.
[01:10:43.680 --> 01:10:54.960]  Got it. It's a very easy read. It's not hard, but you still have to internalize the information
[01:10:54.960 --> 01:10:59.840]  to make a coherent and useful argument with it. Then if they proceed to take you to trial,
[01:10:59.840 --> 01:11:06.640]  you've got appealable error. Okay. Okay. Now, despite what the judge may tell you,
[01:11:06.640 --> 01:11:12.240]  do not tell them that you are doing this, but make damn sure you take something into that
[01:11:12.240 --> 01:11:18.000]  court with you, including a witness. And all of you are more, one or more witnesses at least.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:25.120]  And all of you have something that can at least audio record that no one knows you've got recording.
[01:11:26.400 --> 01:11:32.400]  You want a record of this so you can file it right up your appeal if they try to road you
[01:11:32.400 --> 01:11:39.840]  into court anyway. Okay. Yeah. But if they do that, the next thing you're going to try to do
[01:11:39.840 --> 01:11:47.360]  is file a motion to disqualify the judge for negligence, corruption, incompetence,
[01:11:47.360 --> 01:11:56.000]  and abuse of official capacity. Got it. All right. And I had to, I saw the official capacity. I was
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:00.320]  listening to one of your old shows the other day and had heard that one already and had that written
[01:12:00.320 --> 01:12:07.600]  down and that was one of my, on my list to look up. So. Well, their official capacity
[01:12:07.600 --> 01:12:13.120]  is when they purport to act under color of their office, which is that of a judge. Okay.
[01:12:13.760 --> 01:12:20.080]  The problem is, is when they ignore the law to do what they want instead of what the law requires,
[01:12:20.080 --> 01:12:26.320]  they stop acting like a judge. They no longer have the cover of their office when they do that.
[01:12:26.320 --> 01:12:38.160]  Yes. All right. Okay. That's it. I guess I'll wait for that. And that that should take care
[01:12:38.160 --> 01:12:43.200]  of what you want. And then depending upon what they do from there, if you have questions over
[01:12:43.200 --> 01:12:48.560]  what you read, then you can call in next week or you can email me after the fact. But before you
[01:12:48.560 --> 01:12:54.960]  do anything else, once you get this document, you sit down and you study it as if your life
[01:12:54.960 --> 01:13:02.320]  depended on it. And then you go to my legal blog, which write down this address, tau,
[01:13:02.320 --> 01:13:17.360]  T-A-O, hyphen, huh? Yes, T-A-O hyphen. T-A-O hyphen, O-F hyphen, L-A-W dot com. Okay.
[01:13:18.480 --> 01:13:24.080]  That's my that's my legal blog on WordPress. When you get there, go to the search, the little
[01:13:24.080 --> 01:13:34.880]  magnifying glass field and type in speeding. Okay. Okay. And then once you've done that,
[01:13:34.880 --> 01:13:43.280]  you read every article that pops up in that list. Got it. All right. Know this subject like you know
[01:13:43.280 --> 01:13:54.000]  your own name. All right. Can do. All right. Now, I also have a practice cross examination script,
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:14:01.840]  I think, for speeding. But I will try to email that along with this motion when I send it.
[01:14:03.600 --> 01:14:08.880]  All right. Awesome. Okay. All right. See you next time, baby. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling.
[01:14:08.880 --> 01:14:16.720]  Thank you. Bye-bye. All right. Now we go from Jason to Barrett. Barrett, what can we do for you?
[01:14:16.720 --> 01:14:23.280]  Hey, can you hear me, Eddie? I can. You can. I can. Yeah, this is reception on your terrible.
[01:14:25.760 --> 01:14:35.040]  But hey, I've got two questions. Okay. I, there's this judge that I went before about six weeks ago.
[01:14:35.040 --> 01:14:42.960]  And he just, but anyway, that's one thing. But hey, I've got a traffic question. I was charged
[01:14:42.960 --> 01:14:52.640]  with, I was charged with fictitious plates, displaying fictitious plates. And it's actually
[01:14:52.640 --> 01:14:59.360]  a legitimate DOT number, the kind that you put on the side of a truck, you know, like you put my
[01:14:59.360 --> 01:15:05.120]  truck or something. And that's what was on my plate. So legitimate plate. Okay. Now, wait a minute.
[01:15:05.120 --> 01:15:11.280]  Wait a minute. I should say. You had a DOT number on something that was in the same place as your
[01:15:11.280 --> 01:15:20.560]  license plate. Right. Okay. Now, was, did this license plate, was it done in an attempt to
[01:15:20.560 --> 01:15:28.720]  make the license plate resemble a license plate issued by any state? No. No. Okay. It was white.
[01:15:28.720 --> 01:15:34.400]  Pure white. And all it had was the number and then had DOT on top. Okay. Then what you need
[01:15:34.400 --> 01:15:42.880]  to do is go on to Google Scholar and do a search for Robert Fox. Okay. And what you're going to
[01:15:42.880 --> 01:15:49.680]  find is you're going to find a court case on there that Robert got precedent set at the federal level
[01:15:49.680 --> 01:16:00.160]  where it states very clearly that a fictitious plate under every state law cannot be fictitious
[01:16:00.160 --> 01:16:08.160]  if the place that issued it, one, does not exist or two, it was not done in a manner to make it
[01:16:08.160 --> 01:16:13.360]  appear to be issued by some legitimate authority responsible for the issuance in such place.
[01:16:13.360 --> 01:16:22.880]  Okay. I got another question here. Hold on. Hold on. Now, the other thing you need to do is to
[01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:27.920]  read the statute that they're trying to use against you very carefully and see exactly what the
[01:16:27.920 --> 01:16:36.400]  elements are, such as does it require that the license plate be made to resemble a license plate
[01:16:36.400 --> 01:16:44.320]  issued by the current state or any other state? If that's an element and yours doesn't do that,
[01:16:44.320 --> 01:16:48.160]  they can't prove that element, which means they can't prove the charge.
[01:16:50.640 --> 01:16:55.440]  Okay. Okay. All right. Hang on just a second. Let me take this break and then we'll get back. Okay.
[01:16:57.120 --> 01:16:58.800]  We'll be right back, folks. Y'all hang on.
[01:17:00.800 --> 01:17:05.280]  Are you wondering what this world is coming to and why God isn't stopping it?
[01:17:05.280 --> 01:17:12.000]  Then tune into LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:15.760]  where Nana and guests study God's Word to find these answers and more.
[01:17:16.480 --> 01:17:22.080]  Join us for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to explain God's
[01:17:22.080 --> 01:17:28.720]  plan as well as to provoke unto love and good works. Our first-hour studies are in the book of Matthew.
[01:17:28.720 --> 01:17:34.080]  Our second-hour topics vary each week, exploring sound doctrine as well as Christian character
[01:17:34.080 --> 01:17:40.720]  development. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5.16. Let your light so shine before men that
[01:17:40.720 --> 01:17:46.000]  they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.600]  God's light and to be a blessing to all those who have a hearing year. So tune into Scripture Talk
[01:17:51.600 --> 01:17:58.480]  live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. for an inspiring and motivating study of
[01:17:58.480 --> 01:18:05.600]  the Scriptures. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the
[01:18:05.600 --> 01:18:11.040]  area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed
[01:18:11.040 --> 01:18:18.160]  all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:18.160 --> 01:18:22.880]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:29.040]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. LogosRadioNetwork gets many requests to endorse
[01:18:29.040 --> 01:18:35.600]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much. We became a
[01:18:35.600 --> 01:18:41.440]  marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from
[01:18:41.440 --> 01:18:48.880]  LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize
[01:18:48.880 --> 01:18:55.760]  the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:55.760 --> 01:19:21.760]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:19:26.080 --> 01:19:31.760]  I take a look at my life, and realize it's such a mess, because I've been practicing and laughing so
[01:19:31.760 --> 01:19:37.040]  long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone, but I ain't never caught some man that
[01:19:37.040 --> 01:19:42.640]  didn't deserve it. Maybe treat it like a pump, you know that's unheard of. You better watch how
[01:19:42.640 --> 01:19:48.000]  you're talking, and where you're walking, or you and your homies might be lying in shock. I really
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:54.400]  hate to trip, but I gotta know. As they go, I see myself in the pistol smoke pool. I'm the kind of
[01:19:54.400 --> 01:20:00.400]  guy that's in the pool. All right, folks, this is Eddie on Monday Night's Rule of Law radio show.
[01:20:00.400 --> 01:20:06.960]  Call him number 512-646-1984. We've only got one caller up on the board that I'm currently talking
[01:20:06.960 --> 01:20:14.400]  to, so I need somebody else to chat with. Give me a call. 512-646-1984. All right, back to Barrett
[01:20:14.400 --> 01:20:21.120]  in Colorado. All right, Barrett, please continue. Okay, let me explain what the situation was,
[01:20:21.120 --> 01:20:27.120]  how this cop came upon me, and then you'll understand how, what my defense is going to be.
[01:20:27.840 --> 01:20:35.040]  Okay, see, I moved from Cortez, Colorado. I was out there for four years. I bought some property here
[01:20:35.840 --> 01:20:44.560]  in Northern Apache County, some cheap land, about two acres. I put a trailer, well anyway,
[01:20:44.560 --> 01:20:51.920]  so I was sick of living in government housing in Cortez, Colorado, and I was really getting sick
[01:20:51.920 --> 01:21:03.200]  of it. So in February 20th, I packed up my car. I had my DOT issued number on a plate, on a plate,
[01:21:04.480 --> 01:21:12.640]  and anyway, so I moved out here and I had permission from this church in St. John's, Arizona,
[01:21:12.640 --> 01:21:17.280]  the small town of St. John's. I had permission from this beacon, from this church. I said,
[01:21:17.280 --> 01:21:25.120]  can I park on your property while I'm looking through the ad to get my trailer so I could put
[01:21:25.120 --> 01:21:32.080]  on my property, so I could live on my property instead of living in my stupid car out here on
[01:21:32.080 --> 01:21:39.520]  your... They had a huge parking lot, and I was the only one out there. I mean, it was like
[01:21:39.520 --> 01:21:46.960]  February or early March, and this cop... I'm sitting there eating my lunch and going through
[01:21:47.840 --> 01:21:55.120]  the ads for trailers, and this cop comes up and I have all my window coverings up.
[01:21:55.680 --> 01:22:00.720]  It's an insert to keep the windows from freezing you on the inside of the car, it's like inserts
[01:22:00.720 --> 01:22:10.160]  you put up, really nice stuff. Anyway, this cop comes up, knocks on my window, and I open the door,
[01:22:10.160 --> 01:22:17.200]  and he says, hey, what are you doing here and all this and all that? And before he even knocked on
[01:22:17.200 --> 01:22:21.600]  my door, the first thing he did was walk around the back of my car because I was back in where you
[01:22:21.600 --> 01:22:26.320]  couldn't see it from the parking lot. You would have to get out of your car, walk around to the back
[01:22:26.320 --> 01:22:32.400]  of my car, and look at my plate, so it wasn't on display. So my defense is going to be,
[01:22:33.120 --> 01:22:40.000]  as I was on private property, your honor, because I'm going to bench trial day after tomorrow,
[01:22:40.640 --> 01:22:47.920]  so Wednesday. And I really want to win this because he took my plate off, and I paid 500
[01:22:47.920 --> 01:22:56.880]  bucks for that plate, and he took that plate off. And so on private property, I'm not displaying
[01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:01.920]  anything, don't you have, displaying is a verb, so don't you have going down the street traveling or
[01:23:01.920 --> 01:23:09.680]  driving down the street display? No, no, but here's the thing, you need to read the statute.
[01:23:09.680 --> 01:23:19.760]  Do what I said. All right, let me get, and I also, all right, let me get a pencil or something.
[01:23:19.760 --> 01:23:25.360]  How can I listen to this later on, like when you get this up on your website or something?
[01:23:25.360 --> 01:23:29.440]  Well, you can, you can go to the website and download the archives of the show,
[01:23:30.560 --> 01:23:34.640]  but I don't know how long it takes Deborah to get an archive up after the show is done.
[01:23:34.640 --> 01:23:41.200]  So, I have to find out, once I look this, this statute up or whatever,
[01:23:43.200 --> 01:23:49.280]  you have to see what the elements are listed by the statute. What is the definition of a fictitious
[01:23:49.280 --> 01:23:57.440]  plate? If one of the requirements is that it is made to resemble a plate issued by some proper
[01:23:57.440 --> 01:24:07.760]  authority, i.e. the state you're in or some other state. What do I go to on the internet?
[01:24:07.760 --> 01:24:15.120]  What do I Google this to find out? What state is this? This is Arizona. Okay, then you go,
[01:24:15.120 --> 01:24:18.960]  you do a search on Google for Arizona laws, codes and statutes.
[01:24:18.960 --> 01:24:28.960]  Okay, and anything that specifically points to Arizona, especially Arizona.gov or
[01:24:28.960 --> 01:24:35.600]  Arizona.Ledge or anything like that, that'll probably be the site where you will find what you want
[01:24:35.600 --> 01:24:45.280]  and need. So, the argument that I'm going to use or was the argument will depend upon what the
[01:24:45.280 --> 01:24:52.240]  elements of the offense are. But I'm almost willing to bet you dollars to donuts that the
[01:24:52.240 --> 01:25:02.720]  statute requires that the fictitious plate meet the criteria I just gave you. And when they can't,
[01:25:02.720 --> 01:25:10.000]  when it doesn't do that, they cannot prove that element. And they have to prove every single
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:15.680]  element. If there's three, they've got to prove all three. If there's 12, they've got to prove all
[01:25:15.680 --> 01:25:28.080]  12. If they miss even one, they lose. Okay, so, all right. I'm going to ask you.
[01:25:30.480 --> 01:25:36.480]  So, the argument, okay, so I have to look that up. I can't just say, hey, this doesn't
[01:25:36.480 --> 01:25:43.360]  reach them and it's a legitimate deal. Until that's an element of the offense,
[01:25:43.360 --> 01:25:47.760]  making that argument doesn't do you any good, does it? You're not refuting their allegation,
[01:25:47.760 --> 01:25:52.000]  you're just making a statement. I have to have that number ready, that code number or whatever
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:57.920]  ready when I go to court. I have to have that ready. You need to have everything done in writing
[01:25:57.920 --> 01:26:03.280]  and have it filed so that you're ready. You don't just walk in there and talk off the top of your
[01:26:03.280 --> 01:26:10.240]  head ever. You do this, you do it in writing. If you don't, then there's nothing to go to
[01:26:10.240 --> 01:26:17.200]  on appeal with if they railroad you. You don't file what you do in writing and they ignore it.
[01:26:17.200 --> 01:26:22.480]  How are you going to prove it on appeal? You lose because you can't set up and then write
[01:26:22.480 --> 01:26:30.960]  a letter to them. No, not a letter, not a letter. This is not your girlfriend you're writing to.
[01:26:30.960 --> 01:26:40.160]  This is a court. You write legal pleadings, motions, briefs, memorandums of law, but you don't write
[01:26:40.160 --> 01:26:50.160]  fricking letters. Okay, can I mail a motion in to the court? As long as you send a certified
[01:26:50.160 --> 01:26:56.560]  mail return receipt requested and you send it to the correct place, yes, but you have to file one
[01:26:56.560 --> 01:27:02.080]  with the prosecution as well. Whatever you send to the court, you've got to send to the prosecution
[01:27:02.080 --> 01:27:08.000]  and vice versa. They have to do the same thing for you and when they don't, then they have failed
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:13.680]  to give you proper notice. This is why you also need to be familiar with the rules of procedure
[01:27:13.680 --> 01:27:22.080]  in the state of Colorado or in Arizona. Arizona. Okay, so just the prosecutor and the court.
[01:27:22.080 --> 01:27:31.040]  I have to file that motion with. Yes. And I have to write the actual code number or whatever
[01:27:32.480 --> 01:27:37.520]  so they could. You need to write a document that cites the law they're trying to use
[01:27:37.520 --> 01:27:44.080]  with a coherent argument as to why the law does not apply and thus jurisdiction does not exist.
[01:27:44.080 --> 01:27:54.000]  Okay. I can win on appeal if they do railroad me. I can win on appeal.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:56.480]  If you've got a record, you can fall back on. Yeah.
[01:27:58.560 --> 01:28:04.960]  And the only way to do that is to send a certified return receipt bail and send one to the prosecutor
[01:28:04.960 --> 01:28:09.840]  and one to the. Okay, the first thing you need to do is look and see what the requirements for
[01:28:09.840 --> 01:28:15.120]  making filings in the courts are because of COVID. Most of them are doing it by mail or email.
[01:28:15.760 --> 01:28:21.440]  Okay, call the clerk of the court you're supposed to appear in and ask. It's really that simple.
[01:28:23.360 --> 01:28:30.880]  How do I serve a motion in this case to the court and make sure that it's sent to the prosecution
[01:28:30.880 --> 01:28:36.480]  as well? Get the information from the court court on where to send all that and how to do it.
[01:28:36.480 --> 01:28:42.160]  They can't write your motion before you. They cannot advise you, but they can damn sure give
[01:28:42.160 --> 01:28:45.840]  you the administrative information you need to do what I'm telling you.
[01:28:49.440 --> 01:28:57.680]  Okay. Here's the other question that I had. This judge was, wouldn't allow me to ask questions
[01:28:57.680 --> 01:29:04.880]  about the nature and cause of my, the action against me. And the first question that was
[01:29:04.880 --> 01:29:09.440]  out of my mouth that I asked the judge, I says, your honor is this court bound by the Constitution
[01:29:09.440 --> 01:29:16.160]  and Supreme Court rulings. And this judge came unglued. He, uh, he started getting up out of
[01:29:16.160 --> 01:29:24.480]  his chair and leaning forward and, you know, and just yelling, uh, you are not going to do this,
[01:29:24.480 --> 01:29:29.600]  this way. You're going to listen to me and you're going to do this highway and, and we're not going
[01:29:29.600 --> 01:29:35.600]  to have this and get out of the court. Okay. Now you, now you have a way to disqualify this judge
[01:29:35.600 --> 01:29:41.200]  and get him removed from the case and replaced. Move to disqualify the judge for professional
[01:29:41.200 --> 01:29:48.400]  misconduct. Okay. We're also demonstrating a prejudice and bias against the accused in the
[01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:54.080]  case for simply asking questions. It's, it's unprofessional conduct. You can get that judge
[01:29:54.080 --> 01:29:59.600]  removed from that because it removes all, all premise of fair and impartial in that court.
[01:30:00.640 --> 01:30:04.880]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number,
[01:30:04.880 --> 01:30:09.360]  and date of birth, but you should think twice before giving away your personal data. I'm Dr.
[01:30:09.360 --> 01:30:14.960]  Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment. Google is watching you recording everything
[01:30:14.960 --> 01:30:19.920]  you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information. That's
[01:30:19.920 --> 01:30:25.680]  creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way. StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.680 --> 01:30:30.560]  StartPage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[01:30:30.560 --> 01:30:36.000]  cookies and their third party certified. If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  with StartPage. Great search results and total privacy. StartPage.com, the world's most private
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:47.040]  search engine. Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere, but just because a piece of paper
[01:30:47.040 --> 01:30:51.920]  asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it. I lay blank spaces on forms all the time
[01:30:51.920 --> 01:30:58.160]  or I write N slash A for not applicable and usually nobody notices or cares. I never give my social
[01:30:58.160 --> 01:31:02.960]  security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government
[01:31:02.960 --> 01:31:07.680]  requirement and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually
[01:31:07.680 --> 01:31:12.400]  want them to call me and that's pretty rare. To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice
[01:31:12.400 --> 01:31:17.920]  saying no to random data requests. It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you
[01:31:17.920 --> 01:31:22.880]  do it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.680 --> 01:31:37.600]  I lost my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2001. Most people don't know that
[01:31:37.600 --> 01:31:43.760]  a third tower fell on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by
[01:31:43.760 --> 01:31:50.080]  a plane. I will be official explanation is that fire brought down building 7. Over 1200 architects
[01:31:50.080 --> 01:31:54.400]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story. Bring justice
[01:31:54.400 --> 01:32:00.640]  to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org. Why it fell. Why it matters.
[01:32:00.640 --> 01:32:20.640]  As what you can do. Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place. The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.640 --> 01:32:36.640]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.640 --> 01:33:04.640]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:04.640 --> 01:33:12.640]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:34.640 --> 01:33:46.640]  Alright we are back calling number 512-646-1984 and we are still talking with Barrett in Colorado. Alright Barrett now listen closely okay.
[01:33:46.640 --> 01:33:52.640]  When the judge behaves that way they have violated the rules of judicial conduct okay.
[01:33:52.640 --> 01:34:12.640]  They have removed any appearance of fairness and impartiality. They have demonstrated a belligerence to parties in the court that they preside over. All of those are disqualifying factors because it's not just the fact that they can and do act prejudicially against an individual.
[01:34:12.640 --> 01:34:30.640]  It's the mere impression or perception that they can or will okay. And this judge's attitude and behavior on being asked specific legitimate questions that demonstrates he's not capable of presiding over this case fairly.
[01:34:30.640 --> 01:34:50.640]  File a motion along with your other motion to disqualify that judge citing the date and time you appeared before him exactly what he said in response to your question that your question was asked in a very civil tone and manner and the judge acted hostile and belligerent to you for asking the question.
[01:34:50.640 --> 01:35:06.640]  Thus you move to disqualify for violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and then you need to look up the Code of Judicial Conduct in the state of Arizona and find each section that his actions violated.
[01:35:06.640 --> 01:35:09.640]  You want me to tell you what I did?
[01:35:09.640 --> 01:35:12.640]  What did you do?
[01:35:12.640 --> 01:35:23.640]  I called the Arizona Bar Association and I told them about what this judge was doing.
[01:35:23.640 --> 01:35:31.640]  What does the Arizona Bar Association have to do with a judge? Can you tell me that?
[01:35:31.640 --> 01:35:35.640]  Phone number to call.
[01:35:35.640 --> 01:35:38.640]  What?
[01:35:38.640 --> 01:35:44.640]  The Bar Association gave me a phone number to complain about a judge in Arizona. Any judge in Arizona.
[01:35:44.640 --> 01:35:46.640]  Yeah, okay.
[01:35:46.640 --> 01:35:55.640]  But what was the first thing I told you about the motion that you filed? How are you supposed to file it?
[01:35:55.640 --> 01:35:58.640]  Oh, are you talking about...
[01:35:58.640 --> 01:36:00.640]  In writing, right?
[01:36:00.640 --> 01:36:02.640]  I didn't know about your...
[01:36:02.640 --> 01:36:07.640]  Let me finish about what I'm telling you because I got in between.
[01:36:07.640 --> 01:36:10.640]  Okay, you got him recused.
[01:36:10.640 --> 01:36:13.640]  Okay.
[01:36:13.640 --> 01:36:15.640]  Hello?
[01:36:15.640 --> 01:36:17.640]  Are you there?
[01:36:17.640 --> 01:36:19.640]  Yes, can you hear me?
[01:36:19.640 --> 01:36:22.640]  Yeah, okay. I can hear you now.
[01:36:22.640 --> 01:36:32.640]  Okay. All right. So I called the phone number that the Arizona Bar Association gave me and it was to complain about a judge, any judge in Arizona.
[01:36:32.640 --> 01:36:33.640]  Right.
[01:36:33.640 --> 01:36:46.640]  And I called them and I can't remember what the name of that phone number was, but they sent me a complaint form to complain about the judge and asked me what county I was in.
[01:36:46.640 --> 01:36:55.640]  And they sent me the... They sent me a whole... It was like 50 pages. They sent me the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct.
[01:36:55.640 --> 01:36:56.640]  Right.
[01:36:56.640 --> 01:37:12.640]  And so... And the complaint form asked me what court it was. It's St. John's Judicial Court and the Judge Butch Gunnels.
[01:37:12.640 --> 01:37:22.640]  And anyway, asked me a bunch of questions and then it got to where it asked me what he did or what happened in the court.
[01:37:22.640 --> 01:37:33.640]  I wrote the date and time down and I said, pull the tape so you could see for yourself what this judge did.
[01:37:33.640 --> 01:37:35.640]  So I complained about it. I was just wondering...
[01:37:35.640 --> 01:37:48.640]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Before we go any further, let me clarify something here. You said, instead of answering the question of what he said or did, you said pull the tape yourself?
[01:37:48.640 --> 01:38:00.640]  No, no. I said that... I said just exactly what I told you. I said, I asked him, is this court, your honor, is this court bound by Supreme Court rulings and the Constitution?
[01:38:00.640 --> 01:38:08.640]  He freaked out and I said that, you know, he was... He started yelling at me and then he threw me out. He said, get him out of my courtroom.
[01:38:08.640 --> 01:38:16.640]  And I tried three times to get him to calm down. So...
[01:38:16.640 --> 01:38:18.640]  He was scared again.
[01:38:18.640 --> 01:38:22.640]  I told the judge, are you giving up?
[01:38:22.640 --> 01:38:23.640]  Hello.
[01:38:23.640 --> 01:38:26.640]  Yeah, okay, go ahead. I don't have to move around so much.
[01:38:26.640 --> 01:38:40.640]  I told the judge, I said to the judge, I told the judge, I said, it's your duty to honor your oath and to make sure that I understand the nature and cause of the action against me and you're in violation of that.
[01:38:40.640 --> 01:38:47.640]  I said, get him out. And there was like two or three cops started towards me and to throw me out. So he threw me out.
[01:38:47.640 --> 01:38:52.640]  And I says, no, before I go, are you throwing this thing out or what are you doing?
[01:38:52.640 --> 01:38:58.640]  He says, you'll get something in the mail for a next court date. You're going to learn how to do this my way.
[01:38:58.640 --> 01:39:05.640]  And so I was thinking, can I have this case thrown out because my rights were violated?
[01:39:05.640 --> 01:39:14.640]  No, because those actions were not relevant to the specific facts of the case. You got the judge removed from the case and now some other judge will take it over.
[01:39:14.640 --> 01:39:18.640]  It's going to be an Indian judge called Judge Yellow Horse or something like that.
[01:39:18.640 --> 01:39:20.640]  Okay.
[01:39:20.640 --> 01:39:32.640]  And, you know, I haven't, let me tell you this, I haven't had a driver's license. I haven't applied for a driver's license or anything for like 12, 11 years, for 11 years.
[01:39:32.640 --> 01:39:40.640]  And so I'm basically, I'm a traveler and I don't have insurance or registration or any of that stuff.
[01:39:40.640 --> 01:39:44.640]  And my car's gone too, so they did take my car.
[01:39:44.640 --> 01:39:48.640]  Okay, so that was my Honda.
[01:39:48.640 --> 01:39:55.640]  Well, then you're going to have to sue them for an illegal taking and conversion.
[01:39:55.640 --> 01:40:07.640]  Right. I even tried to get that guy to sell me my car back at the tow yard and he says, no, you have to have a license, registration, and it has to be active.
[01:40:07.640 --> 01:40:10.640]  And you have to be the one that has the license and all.
[01:40:10.640 --> 01:40:20.640]  Oh man. I just said, hey, if you only get 400 bucks or 800 bucks, I'll give you 200 or $300 more if you just sell it back to me.
[01:40:20.640 --> 01:40:29.640]  After all, it is my property. And this guy is just, you know, he says something like, oh, you just don't have any respect for the law and all that.
[01:40:29.640 --> 01:40:32.640]  And I do not believe in the authority vested in government.
[01:40:32.640 --> 01:40:43.640]  If you watch Mark Cascio or Mark Stevens, he doesn't believe in the authority vested in government or who's that other guy?
[01:40:43.640 --> 01:40:51.640]  He's a famous writer. He wrote the book called Authority, The Most Dangerous Myth. Mark and Rose.
[01:40:51.640 --> 01:40:56.640]  I believe this is that stuff. Mark, Mark and Rose and Mark Cascio type stuff.
[01:40:56.640 --> 01:40:58.640]  And Mark Stevens.
[01:40:58.640 --> 01:40:59.640]  Okay.
[01:40:59.640 --> 01:41:01.640]  Can you still hear me?
[01:41:01.640 --> 01:41:04.640]  I can hear you.
[01:41:04.640 --> 01:41:05.640]  Yes, I can hear you.
[01:41:05.640 --> 01:41:18.640]  I'm going to look, I'm going to look all that stuff up that you told me to look up. And so I think I stand a pretty good sense of winning or do you think?
[01:41:18.640 --> 01:41:29.640]  If you follow what I told you and the law reads, as I said, it probably does. Yeah, I would say you do, especially since there's already federal precedent in your favor in that regard.
[01:41:29.640 --> 01:41:38.640]  Okay. Yeah, I go to court on Wednesday. It's a bench trial. I wanted a jury trial because I think I convinced a jury that I'm innocent.
[01:41:38.640 --> 01:41:41.640]  No, you can't.
[01:41:41.640 --> 01:41:43.640]  Why not?
[01:41:43.640 --> 01:41:51.640]  Because the jury's dumber than dirt. And you're never going to be allowed to educate them.
[01:41:51.640 --> 01:41:53.640]  Oh, that's right.
[01:41:53.640 --> 01:41:57.640]  The jury nullification is illegal in Arizona, I guess.
[01:41:57.640 --> 01:42:00.640]  No, it's got nothing to do with jury nullification.
[01:42:00.640 --> 01:42:02.640]  Okay.
[01:42:02.640 --> 01:42:11.640]  A jury can still find you innocent of any bad law, but the problem is educating the jury to understand what the law does and does not apply to.
[01:42:11.640 --> 01:42:15.640]  That is something you're never going to be given an opportunity to do.
[01:42:15.640 --> 01:42:23.640]  And based upon our discussion here tonight, even if you wanted to do it, you don't know how to do it.
[01:42:23.640 --> 01:42:32.640]  Because you're going to be talking about things that there, it's going to be very easy for the prosecution to just simply say irrelevant and stop you dead in your tracks.
[01:42:32.640 --> 01:42:40.640]  You're not going to be able to use the law and the facts to get the information you need in front of a jury.
[01:42:40.640 --> 01:42:45.640]  Hey, I want to get that jurist dictionary. Is that a good thing to learn how to fight these people and win?
[01:42:45.640 --> 01:42:52.640]  Jurist dictionary is for lawsuits. Okay, it's for suing people, not fighting criminal cases.
[01:42:52.640 --> 01:42:56.640]  I want to sue this cop. It took my place.
[01:42:56.640 --> 01:43:13.640]  Well, there again, jurisdiction is great for lawsuits, but it doesn't do you any good at all when it comes to suing a government official and dealing with the 12B6 motion that will immediately be filed under qualified immunity.
[01:43:13.640 --> 01:43:28.640]  Okay, if you don't have a clue how to get around qualified immunity and write that up in your lawsuit so that you can do that and then argue it when it comes up in rebuttal to the 12B6 that will absolutely be filed, it won't do you any good.
[01:43:28.640 --> 01:43:34.640]  And jurisdictionary, as of the last time I studied it, did not do that.
[01:43:34.640 --> 01:43:39.640]  What else should I buy along with that?
[01:43:39.640 --> 01:43:44.640]  Well, I don't know. I don't know what your capabilities are at absorbing information.
[01:43:44.640 --> 01:43:47.640]  Okay?
[01:43:47.640 --> 01:43:53.640]  But as far as what's out there, like I said, jurist dictionaries for civil lawsuits is not for fighting criminal cases.
[01:43:53.640 --> 01:43:57.640]  Hang on just a second. Let's finish this on the other side. Hang on.
[01:43:57.640 --> 01:43:59.640]  Okay.
[01:43:59.640 --> 01:44:09.640]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos.
[01:44:09.640 --> 01:44:19.640]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:44:19.640 --> 01:44:21.640]  How can I help logos?
[01:44:21.640 --> 01:44:31.640]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:44:31.640 --> 01:44:43.640]  Now, go to LogosRegulatework.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:44:43.640 --> 01:44:44.640]  Do I pay extra?
[01:44:44.640 --> 01:44:45.640]  No.
[01:44:45.640 --> 01:44:47.640]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:44:47.640 --> 01:44:48.640]  No.
[01:44:48.640 --> 01:44:49.640]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:44:49.640 --> 01:44:50.640]  No.
[01:44:50.640 --> 01:44:51.640]  Yes.
[01:44:51.640 --> 01:44:56.640]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:44:56.640 --> 01:44:58.640]  We are welcome.
[01:44:58.640 --> 01:45:27.640]  Happy Holidays, Logos!
[01:45:28.640 --> 01:45:43.640]  This dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.640 --> 01:46:05.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradios.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:05.640 --> 01:46:34.640]  Alright folks, we are back. We are now in the last segment of the show. I'm going to see if I can get this wrapped up real quick. I've got Barrett and John on the line. Alright Barrett, let's see if we can get this wrapped up.
[01:46:34.640 --> 01:46:36.640]  The last question.
[01:47:04.640 --> 01:47:23.640]  I just told you, in the case you're in, it won't help you. Sue in the cop, it'll help you write the lawsuit, but it won't do a darn thing to help you overcome the 12B6.
[01:47:23.640 --> 01:47:43.640]  And that's going to get filed. I guarantee you it's going to get filed. And if you don't study up in the court cases that involve 12B6s, how to respond to an answer of 12B6 in a way that doesn't let them throw the case out, you're going to lose. You filed the case for nothing.
[01:47:43.640 --> 01:47:53.640]  Should I have this? I'm going to a bench trial on Wednesday. Should I have these set over?
[01:47:53.640 --> 01:47:54.640]  Have what set over?
[01:47:54.640 --> 01:47:57.640]  My bench trial is set over so I can prepare better.
[01:47:57.640 --> 01:48:08.640]  Well, you can ask for an extension of time so that you can better prepare your case. Just tell them that you're seeking legal counsel and you haven't yet found an attorney to take the case.
[01:48:08.640 --> 01:48:12.640]  Okay, I'll just tell them that even though I'm working myself.
[01:48:12.640 --> 01:48:14.640]  Well, all right.
[01:48:14.640 --> 01:48:16.640]  Let me, let me clear you on something.
[01:48:16.640 --> 01:48:21.640]  Don't wait a minute. Stop talking. Listen first. Talk later.
[01:48:21.640 --> 01:48:23.640]  Now listen.
[01:48:23.640 --> 01:48:24.640]  Okay.
[01:48:24.640 --> 01:48:28.640]  Stop saying stuff like that on air. Okay.
[01:48:28.640 --> 01:48:34.640]  When you file a document in a court, you have to do it under penalty of perjury. You get that?
[01:48:34.640 --> 01:48:44.640]  Which means you can't lie to the court. So when I tell you to file a document based upon something you're trying to do in your case, accept it for what it is.
[01:48:44.640 --> 01:48:57.640]  Don't tell me what you're going to do regardless of what it is because if someone finds this radio show that's in that court handling your case and they hear what you just said, guess what they're going to do with that motion you filed?
[01:48:57.640 --> 01:49:01.640]  They're going to use it to get you charged with perjury.
[01:49:01.640 --> 01:49:02.640]  Wow.
[01:49:02.640 --> 01:49:06.640]  Okay, Roger. I got you. All right.
[01:49:06.640 --> 01:49:09.640]  Thanks, Eddie. Appreciate it.
[01:49:09.640 --> 01:49:11.640]  All right. Anything else?
[01:49:11.640 --> 01:49:13.640]  No, no, that's it.
[01:49:13.640 --> 01:49:18.640]  Okay. All right. Well, thanks for calling in, Bert.
[01:49:18.640 --> 01:49:28.640]  All right. Now we have John in New York. John, I've only got this segment. So whatever you've got, make it short.
[01:49:28.640 --> 01:49:35.640]  Well, I'm sorry. Hang on. All right, John, let's try that again.
[01:49:35.640 --> 01:49:37.640]  All right. Can you hear me now?
[01:49:37.640 --> 01:49:39.640]  Yeah, I can hear you now.
[01:49:39.640 --> 01:49:43.640]  Okay, great. Thank you very much. I'll make it short and sweet.
[01:49:43.640 --> 01:49:56.640]  Recently in the news, recently in the news, some parents who were attending public meetings of their local school board, there were some things that the school boards were doing and the parents were not in agreement with.
[01:49:56.640 --> 01:50:01.640]  So they stood up and in a nice way, they let their feelings be known.
[01:50:01.640 --> 01:50:05.640]  They were told to keep quiet, to sit down, to leave.
[01:50:05.640 --> 01:50:24.640]  And then not only among the school board people, there was a move in the government to have people who have any difference of opinion with what a local school board is doing to be declared domestic terrorists.
[01:50:24.640 --> 01:50:31.640]  Please comment on all the rights that have been violated, actions of what to do about it.
[01:50:31.640 --> 01:50:45.640]  Some of the people, I guess, were arrested and they want people like that that have any kind of a dissenting opinion, whether it be against Trump or for Trump or whoever to be declared domestic terrorists.
[01:50:45.640 --> 01:50:50.640]  I don't know what Trump has to do with the school board meetings, but let me address this real quick.
[01:50:50.640 --> 01:50:54.640]  First and foremost, there's no law in place authorizing anything these people do.
[01:50:54.640 --> 01:50:57.640]  School boards are subject to the Open Government Act in every state.
[01:50:57.640 --> 01:51:05.640]  Therefore, as a public body, they cannot prevent these parents from appearing and commenting on whatever it is they're doing.
[01:51:05.640 --> 01:51:11.640]  Okay, open government acts in every state prohibit the school board from having any authority to do any of that.
[01:51:11.640 --> 01:51:27.640]  Therefore, if the two things the parents should do is organize and then seek the removal, permanent removal from any such position ever again of every one of these school board officials across their entire state.
[01:51:27.640 --> 01:51:34.640]  Anyone that's sanctioning this and hoping to get it pushed that way, these parents should band together and get them ousted in the discussion.
[01:51:34.640 --> 01:51:47.640]  Anyone, any one of these parents that suffered detrimentally because of the actions of the school board or their child suffered detrimentally should seek to sue the school board for any act it did that harmed them or their children.
[01:51:47.640 --> 01:51:53.640]  But they better be able to prove everything they're making the allegation for, just like in any other case.
[01:51:53.640 --> 01:51:56.640]  Okay, that's, it's as simple as that.
[01:51:56.640 --> 01:52:05.640]  There's no law allowing anything that's going on to happen. In fact, there's laws specifically prohibiting it from happening and they're doing it anyway.
[01:52:05.640 --> 01:52:13.640]  But of course, no one reads the law except for those that wish to use it against the everyday people.
[01:52:13.640 --> 01:52:23.640]  Okay, now the reason why I mentioned Trump, just like anybody who supports Trump is they want to declare and they have declared to be domestic terrorists.
[01:52:23.640 --> 01:52:29.640]  They do the same thing with school board and the people that come before them to complain.
[01:52:29.640 --> 01:52:36.640]  Okay, now how do you, last question, how do you go about getting them removed? What is involved?
[01:52:36.640 --> 01:52:51.640]  Well, I don't know. That will vary from state to state. Whatever the requirements for seeking removal of these people are, petitions, whatever, public petitions, signatures, petitioning a court, I don't know.
[01:52:51.640 --> 01:52:57.640]  You need to look up what the laws in your state say, govern getting these people removed.
[01:52:57.640 --> 01:52:59.640]  Okay, got it.
[01:52:59.640 --> 01:53:00.640]  Okay.
[01:53:00.640 --> 01:53:05.640]  Alrighty. Yep, that's basically it. That's all I needed to know.
[01:53:05.640 --> 01:53:07.640]  All right. Well, thanks for calling in, John.
[01:53:07.640 --> 01:53:09.640]  Thank you very much.
[01:53:09.640 --> 01:53:15.640]  Yes, sir. All right. Now we have Eric in California. Eric, you got just at five minutes.
[01:53:15.640 --> 01:53:26.640]  Perfect. That's all I need. So two things. One is, can you elaborate on sales tax and who's made liable for that?
[01:53:26.640 --> 01:53:38.640]  Sales tax, if you go back to its origin in every state, sales tax is a tax upon the privilege of doing business within the state if it's an out of state corporation.
[01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:45.640]  Here in Texas, for example, the sales tax does not apply to any business that is headquartered in this state if it's incorporated.
[01:53:45.640 --> 01:53:54.640]  It doesn't apply to any unincorporated business at all. It has to be an incorporated business if you actually read the law.
[01:53:54.640 --> 01:54:05.640]  And it cannot be used. It's basically made to level the playing field between foreign commerce within the state and the local businesses themselves.
[01:54:05.640 --> 01:54:18.640]  So that big chains like Walmart and Sam's Club and all that cannot undercut the local businesses and drive them out of business by price and material undercutting them because of their bigger budgets.
[01:54:18.640 --> 01:54:31.640]  That's what the sales tax was originally created to do and was intended to do. It was not a revenue measure. It was a business protection measure.
[01:54:31.640 --> 01:54:44.640]  Okay, cool. That was my understanding of it. And then also, worker's compensation, California says it's all for state government agencies, city, county, state.
[01:54:44.640 --> 01:54:47.640]  I don't understand the question.
[01:54:47.640 --> 01:55:03.640]  Oh, worker's comp is usually applied to all the private sector businesses. If you hire employees, you're going to have worker's comp. But if you read the statutes in California, they list the employer as only government agencies.
[01:55:03.640 --> 01:55:15.640]  Well, that's a fact. I mean, the government cannot compel a local business to do something detrimental to the local business as long as it's not harmful to the public.
[01:55:15.640 --> 01:55:23.640]  Okay, the federal government never has the power to dictate minimum wage to the states. Period. No matter how much they want to say they can't.
[01:55:23.640 --> 01:55:33.640]  There's no such power given to the federal government. The federal government cannot set minimum wage except for federal employees. That's it.
[01:55:33.640 --> 01:55:38.640]  They can't do it for anyone else. The exact same thing applies to the state.
[01:55:38.640 --> 01:55:58.640]  The state cannot set a minimum wage for anyone because to do so would directly violate the state constitution's prohibition on impairing the obligation of contracts because every person within the state is free to agree to any contract that is not legally unconscionable.
[01:55:58.640 --> 01:56:10.640]  So piggybacking off of that when, I guess, if they have all these contractors' licenses, I know we've talked about it, where it's to protect the consumer.
[01:56:10.640 --> 01:56:21.640]  Is that the only reason, I guess, that they have those licenses is to protect the consumer, but we have a right to contract.
[01:56:21.640 --> 01:56:25.640]  And so where does that right to contract kind of stopped where you have to?
[01:56:25.640 --> 01:56:36.640]  It stops when we're dealing with a regulable type of business and occupation versus an occupation of common right.
[01:56:36.640 --> 01:56:54.640]  If the occupation is one that represents a specific and inherent danger to the public, if qualified individuals are not the ones doing the work and performing everything involved in it, like architects and things of that nature when you're building skyscrapers.
[01:56:54.640 --> 01:56:58.640]  Okay, engineers and all those other things.
[01:56:58.640 --> 01:57:09.640]  I'll be damned if I want Tommy the hard hat carpenter from down the block building a skyscraper because he knows how to build dog houses.
[01:57:09.640 --> 01:57:11.640]  You get my drift?
[01:57:11.640 --> 01:57:18.640]  Yeah, so if you were landscaping, you could just exercise your right to contract.
[01:57:18.640 --> 01:57:36.640]  Yes, if you're doing an occupation of common right, in other words, it's not regulated because the job itself has a direct relation to public health and welfare, then, yeah, it's an occupation of common right.
[01:57:36.640 --> 01:57:39.640]  Okay.
[01:57:39.640 --> 01:57:41.640]  Okay, that was it tonight.
[01:57:41.640 --> 01:57:55.640]  Yeah, I mean, that's why you're free to build your own house and it not be up to code, though they may not let you hook it to the power grid or anything else, but they sure as hell can't stop you from building it the way you want to build it, code or not.
[01:57:55.640 --> 01:58:08.640]  But if you hire someone to do it, that someone has to jump to all the hoops and do everything that's required because they're doing it as a business and their business has a direct impact upon the health and welfare of the public.
[01:58:08.640 --> 01:58:13.640]  Okay, thank you.
[01:58:13.640 --> 01:58:15.640]  All right, thanks for calling in here.
[01:58:15.640 --> 01:58:20.640]  All right, folks, I want to thank y'all for listening and for calling in to the Monday night rule of law radio show.
[01:58:20.640 --> 01:58:22.640]  I'm so glad I was able to be on the night.
[01:58:22.640 --> 01:58:27.640]  I want to thank all the listeners for all the people that donate to us and especially those who have been donating to me.
[01:58:27.640 --> 01:58:28.640]  I appreciate you so much.
[01:58:28.640 --> 01:58:31.640]  I could not have gotten by without you folks want to thank you again.
[01:58:31.640 --> 01:58:32.640]  You have a great week.
[01:58:32.640 --> 01:58:33.640]  Good night.
[01:58:33.640 --> 01:58:50.640]  God bless.
[01:58:50.640 --> 01:59:08.640]  The Bible's for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version.
[01:59:08.640 --> 01:59:20.640]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.640 --> 01:59:30.640]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.640 --> 01:59:32.640]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.640 --> 01:59:40.640]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.640 --> 01:59:49.640]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.640 --> 02:00:03.640]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.