[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, brand crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.840]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, bitcoin core $10,566.52, ethereum $200.00
[00:29.840 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31 and bitcoin cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.920 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.400 --> 00:58.080]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10
[00:58.080 --> 01:07.440]  and entering 40 today in history and recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House bill
[01:07.440 --> 01:13.120]  1325 legalizing HEP into taxes law back in June county prosecutors around the state including
[01:13.120 --> 01:17.680]  Houston, Austin, San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:17.680 --> 01:22.240]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory
[01:22.240 --> 01:27.440]  equipment to test the error for THC Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced
[01:27.440 --> 01:32.400]  earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:32.400 --> 01:37.040]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:37.040 --> 01:42.080]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.080 --> 01:48.320]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well
[01:48.320 --> 01:55.280]  as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso Kyma Esparza a Democrat who also stated
[01:55.280 --> 02:00.240]  earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana
[02:00.240 --> 02:06.000]  cases in El Paso however the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public
[02:06.000 --> 02:10.720]  defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.720 --> 02:15.200]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone is charged with
[02:15.200 --> 02:24.720]  something the test matches what they're charged with a paper by Tulane University identified a
[02:24.720 --> 02:29.920]  five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico
[02:29.920 --> 02:35.440]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[02:35.440 --> 02:41.040]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean according to the university paper the shark
[02:41.040 --> 02:47.840]  secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure
[02:47.840 --> 02:57.920]  and prey who may be drawn into the glow this is book roadie with your lowdown for July 22nd 2019
[03:03.200 --> 03:08.080]  what happens when you call the cops say what this is what happens when you call the cops come on
[03:08.080 --> 03:12.800]  this is what happens when you call the cops if you get your rights violated or you all get shot
[03:12.800 --> 03:20.480]  this is what happens when you call the cops this is what happens when you call the cops
[03:20.480 --> 03:26.320]  get your rights violated or you all get shot people being victimized by criminal cops psychopathic
[03:26.320 --> 03:30.560]  predators they arrive in neighborhood blocks stick up with pepper playmate cuffs taters and
[03:30.560 --> 03:35.680]  cuffs good evening this is the Monday night rule-of-law radio show with your host Eddie Craig
[03:35.680 --> 03:45.600]  it is June 14th 2021 yes we are live tonight I really am on the air um I do have something I
[03:45.600 --> 03:51.280]  want to talk about but it is not legal related at the moment it is something that we're about to
[03:51.280 --> 03:58.800]  try to get started um I have finally gotten around to a point financially and equipment wise where I
[03:58.800 --> 04:06.960]  believe I could start doing online classes on zoom uh and the reason zoom was chosen is because it's
[04:07.520 --> 04:13.280]  compared to a lot of other places for this stuff it's it's a lot less expensive uh it
[04:13.280 --> 04:21.120]  works for everything that we need to use it for for the time being um I I can get up to 100 people
[04:21.120 --> 04:27.840]  at a time on it so that's good it'll work with the equipment that I have which is also good though
[04:27.840 --> 04:36.000]  I'm trying to improve that uh however I can but that's another issue but the reason I wanted to
[04:36.000 --> 04:41.120]  bring that up is I put an announcement about that effort on Facebook but now I want to bring it up
[04:41.120 --> 04:47.920]  on the air to the listeners who may not be on Facebook what I'm looking at is at the moment
[04:47.920 --> 04:55.760]  the popular poll is that the class will either be on a Tuesday or Thursday night from eight
[04:55.760 --> 05:03.120]  to ten p.m central standard time now wherever you are listening to this show if that's a time
[05:03.680 --> 05:10.400]  that's the time in Texas now um if that time would work with you to participate for those two
[05:10.400 --> 05:15.280]  hours these classes are going to be like these Sunday classes at brave new books they're going
[05:15.280 --> 05:22.400]  to be subscription only which means you're going to have to uh subscribe to them uh either online
[05:22.400 --> 05:28.160]  via PayPal uh with a recurring payment or you're going to have to send in your payments in advance
[05:28.160 --> 05:33.840]  before the class is for the month or the year however you want to do it and at this very new
[05:33.840 --> 05:40.960]  books it was 20 per person per class that was the rate that I charged down there I want to be able
[05:40.960 --> 05:48.080]  to do it less expensively than that but whether or not I can is going to depend upon how many people
[05:48.080 --> 05:54.480]  actually participate on a regular basis the more subscribers we have to these classes
[05:54.480 --> 06:01.600]  the lower the price can be made for everyone involved because I could spread out the money
[06:01.600 --> 06:06.800]  a little bit better I could cover my bills still and thus lessen the burden on everybody else
[06:06.800 --> 06:13.680]  is what they have to pay to participate um as time progresses I expect that cost to go down
[06:13.680 --> 06:20.400]  unless other costs involved go up which God knows that's beyond my control but we will see
[06:21.760 --> 06:25.760]  but in all the time I've been doing this that was the rate for the class I don't
[06:25.760 --> 06:30.640]  like charging people a ton of money for something and I noticed some that's a lot of money 20
[06:30.640 --> 06:37.920]  dollars a class but when you consider that it breaks down to you having to spend only 10
[06:37.920 --> 06:48.320]  dollars an hour for a total of 104 hours a year okay to learn the things that you're not being
[06:48.320 --> 06:54.880]  taught and how best to use them to help yourself it becomes an extremely good investment in time
[06:54.880 --> 07:02.240]  and money okay now the beauty of zoom is and it's not a great beauty but it's a beauty nonetheless
[07:02.240 --> 07:10.000]  is that we can record the sessions okay I can make local recordings or I can make cloud recordings
[07:10.000 --> 07:15.200]  and those who cannot actively participate in the class at the designated time
[07:16.160 --> 07:22.480]  if they're a subscriber they can still access the videos of the class for the ones that they have
[07:22.480 --> 07:29.600]  to miss so they can always go back at any point and catch up all they have to do is let me know
[07:29.600 --> 07:36.880]  the need access to the video and I can send them the information to get access okay it's not directly
[07:36.880 --> 07:43.520]  accessible from the zoom call you will have to go through me to get to the video of the class
[07:44.320 --> 07:49.200]  but once I know who's going to be there on a regular basis and who is it we can kind of make
[07:49.200 --> 07:53.200]  that an automatic thing where I set up a link and email it out to the people that I know are
[07:53.200 --> 08:00.880]  going to miss that class at the end of every meeting all right so right now we're going to
[08:00.880 --> 08:09.120]  start the class off at a $20 per week subscription on a monthly basis this and that's the only way
[08:09.120 --> 08:16.560]  I can do it because I don't know if PayPal will let you set up monthly recurring or weekly recurring
[08:16.560 --> 08:24.640]  or off but it will do it so if it only does the minimum amount of monthly then that's what you're
[08:24.640 --> 08:30.480]  going to have to go with it's not going to be on a buy class basis it's going to be on a subscription
[08:30.480 --> 08:39.120]  basis because I have to be able to plan out what money I'm going to have and how much I've been
[08:39.120 --> 08:45.120]  free the last 10 years I've been in Austin that has been something I have not been able to do I
[08:45.120 --> 08:51.200]  have had to live hand to mouth every single week not knowing how many people I'm going to have
[08:51.200 --> 08:57.360]  not knowing how you know how long things are going to work out the bookstore clothes make that even
[08:57.360 --> 09:03.840]  worse so it's a big deal to me okay it's a very big deal not being able to plan for that stuff
[09:04.960 --> 09:10.080]  so when I need something I need to know whether or not I've got any money that's going to be
[09:10.080 --> 09:15.680]  available for that so this is why this is going to go from a week by week class to a monthly
[09:15.680 --> 09:21.440]  subscription class we're going to start at 20 and hopefully we can go down very soon the more people
[09:21.440 --> 09:28.960]  we start to get if I can get at least 20 people I'm up to 17 at least according to Facebook
[09:29.680 --> 09:37.440]  if I can get over 20 then I can knock that down I can go from 20 down to something else to say like
[09:37.440 --> 09:45.600]  15 dollars per class per person okay so that that's just a plan right now that's where we're working
[09:45.600 --> 09:51.520]  at everything is not finalized yet I have not purchased the zoom subscription I've been testing
[09:51.520 --> 09:59.680]  the free one to see what I can do what I can't do how good it is the video quality produced by
[09:59.680 --> 10:06.320]  zoom is terrible okay especially when you're having to use excellent webcams to make the video I've
[10:06.320 --> 10:13.040]  got two c920 webcams which as webcams with Skype or something like that they're excellent
[10:14.000 --> 10:20.960]  but when you use them in zooms zooms video capabilities are really really poor quality
[10:21.520 --> 10:28.640]  if I move or twitch in these video cameras there's massive tearing in the video image it's just
[10:28.640 --> 10:34.640]  absolutely horrible quality I don't know how to correct that so what I'm going to have to do is
[10:34.640 --> 10:42.480]  come up with a different hardware solution that will allow me to use either different video recording
[10:42.480 --> 10:50.160]  software that feeds to my Elgato card to make this work or I'm going to have to figure out a way to
[10:50.160 --> 10:57.040]  get my new Samsung phone to serve as my video camera which is extremely high quality but I've
[10:57.040 --> 11:03.600]  got to be able to use it as a webcam and get that video into the Elgato card which will record me
[11:03.600 --> 11:10.480]  really high quality video directly to my hard drive and then I could bypass the zoom recordings of
[11:10.480 --> 11:16.960]  the webcams and cells all together and just send everything out in the stream with really good video
[11:16.960 --> 11:25.440]  and audio to everybody that's what I'm hoping to do so I've got a request for help in on people that
[11:25.440 --> 11:32.880]  have done that type of video setup and streaming I'm really really needing help from somebody that
[11:32.880 --> 11:38.320]  knows how to do this stuff right there's a lot of stuff I can do in computers but video streaming
[11:38.320 --> 11:44.400]  is one of the things I have never even tried to do never have no clue how to do it when I'm having
[11:44.400 --> 11:50.880]  to integrate a bunch of equipment I know how to get my mixer and my really good mic involved in this
[11:50.880 --> 11:56.720]  that for an audio source that's no problem but I need to combine this separate audio source
[11:56.720 --> 12:03.040]  with really good quality video from my new cell phone into a single video stream and get it out
[12:03.040 --> 12:09.760]  of the world and and uh down into an actual save video file so anybody out there listening that
[12:09.760 --> 12:18.320]  knows how to do this and do it well please send me an email eddie.de.de at ruleoflawradio.com
[12:18.320 --> 12:23.600]  if you can offer me some help and guidance on how to do this I'll be more than happy to take it
[12:23.600 --> 12:30.720]  I'd pay for it if I could afford it but like I said everything I have is I have no way of
[12:30.720 --> 12:35.840]  planning for what to spend and I have no spare money to go each and every week I do what I can
[12:35.840 --> 12:41.520]  on a shoe string and that's why I have to request help for people so often because everything I do
[12:41.520 --> 12:46.800]  here we don't get paid to do this stuff for you guys and I've got to find a way to change that
[12:46.800 --> 12:52.240]  somehow so the online classes are going to be the only way I can do that it's going to be vastly
[12:52.240 --> 12:57.760]  different than what we do here on the radio show yes we are going to be talking about the same stuff
[12:57.760 --> 13:04.560]  but we're going to be going in depth in the class on teaching you what to do with it and how
[13:04.560 --> 13:11.520]  not only for texas but how to do the exact same thing in your own state we're going to have the
[13:11.520 --> 13:18.160]  sessions where we're dedicated to letting somebody from a different state ask questions talk about
[13:18.160 --> 13:24.800]  their law we're going to show them how to find it what it says what it means how to read it
[13:24.800 --> 13:32.320]  and then how to use it okay we're about to try to make ourselves an educated population if people
[13:32.320 --> 13:40.880]  will participate that's the goal okay so if you would like to join in on that and can afford to
[13:40.880 --> 13:46.640]  do that uh which I say right now that's what it's going to have to be for me to pay what bills I've
[13:46.640 --> 13:55.600]  got uh and uh as soon as I can lower that cost I will do so okay so please help me out if at all
[13:55.600 --> 14:00.640]  possible you want to participate once we get everything set up on the website where you can
[14:00.640 --> 14:06.320]  go it's going to be set up on a button on my legal blog and possibly on rule of law it depends
[14:06.320 --> 14:10.720]  on whether or not we can get access to the code for the rule of law pages to set the button up
[14:10.720 --> 14:17.520]  but for right now we're definitely going trying to get one uh coded for my legal blog which is
[14:17.520 --> 14:33.280]  tau of law t a o o f l a w dot com okay uh or i'm sorry tau of law dot wordpress dot com or tau hyphen
[14:33.840 --> 14:45.840]  of hyphen law hyphen uh dot com okay take t a o hyphen o f hyphen la w dot com that's the actual
[14:45.840 --> 14:51.600]  web domain so you can get to it in either of those two ways uh once we have that up on the page you'll
[14:51.600 --> 14:57.360]  be able to make uh your subscription to the course directly from there and then once we get it up on
[14:57.360 --> 15:04.320]  rule of law radio you'll be able to go and make one there as well okay so that said that's the
[15:04.320 --> 15:11.520]  announcement I've got for today uh I'm going I've got the phones turned on the calling number for
[15:11.520 --> 15:18.720]  the show is five one two six four six nineteen eighty four you want to call start talking I've
[15:18.720 --> 15:24.720]  got the phones open you can get in line and we can do that okay I don't have any other presentations
[15:24.720 --> 15:28.800]  or anything like that prepared I'm planning on talking about how we're trying to get these
[15:28.800 --> 15:35.600]  classes set up for the rest of the show if I have to if I don't get calls but tonight uh that's where
[15:35.600 --> 15:42.160]  we're focused I'm trying to get something organized so that we can get this stuff underway to teach
[15:42.160 --> 15:48.960]  people how to fight the crap that's going on and folks if you think it's been bad I'm telling you
[15:48.960 --> 15:54.160]  here and now with all the other crap the federal government's pulling all the covid crap all the
[15:54.160 --> 16:01.120]  mass crap all the business closing crap there is a plethora of things that are going to come to
[16:01.120 --> 16:07.600]  fruition here about people wanting to know how to go after government entities and individuals
[16:07.600 --> 16:13.520]  for their actions during all this and these classes are going to be one of the things that helps to do
[16:13.520 --> 16:20.640]  that all right just like this show has been helpful to people the classes I'm hoping will be even more
[16:20.640 --> 16:27.520]  so why because it's group think it's group participation it's not just me trying to explain
[16:27.520 --> 16:32.160]  something to a handful of people and then having them call in and ask questions about
[16:32.960 --> 16:41.360]  okay so that said calling number 512 646 1984 if you want to call and get in line for something
[16:41.360 --> 16:47.040]  you've got going on or just to talk please give us a call and right now we are about to take a break
[16:47.040 --> 16:59.840]  so y'all hang on and we will be right back
[17:03.680 --> 17:09.440]  it's the 2019 logos radio network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by central
[17:09.440 --> 17:15.840]  texas gunworks go to logosradio network dot com and enter to win any amount is appreciated
[17:15.840 --> 17:21.120]  everything helps to keep us on the air from central texas gunworks the grand prize up for
[17:21.120 --> 17:28.880]  grabs is a spikes tactical ar 15 more prizes and sponsors to be announced every $25 donation is a
[17:28.880 --> 17:35.440]  chance to win when you purchase randy kelton's ebook legal 101 you get four chances to win
[17:35.440 --> 17:40.880]  purchase eddie craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win if you've enjoyed the shows on
[17:40.880 --> 17:46.080]  logos radio network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[17:46.080 --> 17:52.160]  programming on talk radio today we also accept bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and remember
[17:52.160 --> 17:58.880]  every $25 donation is a chance to win go to logosradio network dot com for details and donate
[17:58.880 --> 18:06.160]  today are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even losses stop debt
[18:06.160 --> 18:12.000]  collectors now with the michael miras proven method michael miras has won six cases in federal court
[18:12.000 --> 18:17.200]  against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step-by-step instructions in plain
[18:17.200 --> 18:22.720]  english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do when contacted by
[18:22.720 --> 18:28.160]  phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors out of
[18:28.160 --> 18:34.000]  your credit reports how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:34.000 --> 18:40.000]  the michael miras proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation
[18:40.000 --> 18:45.280]  is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the
[18:45.280 --> 18:52.000]  blue michael miras banner or email michael miras at yahoo dot com that's rule of law radio dot com
[18:52.000 --> 19:07.920]  or email michael miras at yahoo dot com to learn how to stop debt collectors next
[20:22.240 --> 20:24.240]  who
[20:24.240 --> 20:28.240]  Because I'm the one who's thinking I'm the next
[20:28.240 --> 20:31.240]  That I'm gonna take a chance
[20:33.240 --> 20:36.240]  Yeah, I love the song Blue
[20:36.240 --> 20:38.240]  It's gonna ring in my head
[20:38.240 --> 20:40.240]  That's a piece I haven't thought
[20:40.240 --> 20:42.240]  Look at this
[20:42.240 --> 20:44.240]  Can I be cold?
[20:44.240 --> 20:48.240]  My whole life's been into a great event
[20:48.240 --> 20:54.240]  Hell, my whole life's been into this while I was at home
[20:54.240 --> 20:56.240]  My head is a madhouse
[20:56.240 --> 20:58.240]  It feels like I'm being called
[20:58.240 --> 21:02.240]  My reason is that I'm gonna lose my star
[21:02.240 --> 21:04.240]  Parallel story
[21:04.240 --> 21:06.240]  Now that I've fallen too far
[21:06.240 --> 21:08.240]  I'm gonna go
[21:09.240 --> 21:11.240]  From the bottom and to the bottom
[21:14.240 --> 21:16.240]  You will come to know
[21:16.240 --> 21:19.240]  From the bottom and to the bottom
[21:22.240 --> 21:24.240]  I'm falling down a spiral
[21:24.240 --> 21:26.240]  To destination unknown
[21:27.240 --> 21:30.240]  No time to measure all alone
[21:31.240 --> 21:33.240]  Can't get no connection
[21:33.240 --> 21:36.240]  Can't get through where I am
[21:36.240 --> 21:39.240]  Alright folks, sorry about that slap technical difficulty there
[21:39.240 --> 21:41.240]  I got that worked out
[21:41.240 --> 21:43.240]  And now we are back
[21:43.240 --> 21:45.240]  Okay
[21:45.240 --> 21:48.240]  Now while we're waiting for caller to get up on the floor
[21:48.240 --> 21:51.240]  There is something I want to go ahead and talk about for
[21:52.240 --> 21:54.240]  Until we get some
[21:54.240 --> 21:56.240]  Now
[21:56.240 --> 21:59.240]  Right now we know that here in Texas
[21:59.240 --> 22:01.240]  When it comes to
[22:01.240 --> 22:04.240]  Any kind of misdemeanor case
[22:04.240 --> 22:08.240]  They amended the bill of rights within the Texas Constitution
[22:08.240 --> 22:10.240]  To remove the requirement that
[22:10.240 --> 22:12.240]  Any prosecution of a criminal offense
[22:12.240 --> 22:15.240]  Whether it be felony or misdemeanor
[22:15.240 --> 22:18.240]  Was required to be done
[22:18.240 --> 22:21.240]  First by the presentment of a grand jury
[22:21.240 --> 22:25.240]  They couldn't just go to the court with information
[22:25.240 --> 22:28.240]  And charge you with a criminal offense
[22:28.240 --> 22:31.240]  They literally had to take any crime
[22:31.240 --> 22:33.240]  To a grand jury
[22:33.240 --> 22:35.240]  Get an indictment
[22:35.240 --> 22:38.240]  And then prosecute you based upon the indictment
[22:38.240 --> 22:42.240]  In fact, the information is what had to be used to make the presentment
[22:42.240 --> 22:44.240]  To the grand jury
[22:44.240 --> 22:48.240]  And the informations in Texas have to be based upon complaints
[22:48.240 --> 22:50.240]  So
[22:50.240 --> 22:54.240]  The prerequisite documents before any criminal prosecution was
[22:54.240 --> 22:57.240]  A verified criminal complaint
[22:57.240 --> 23:00.240]  An information signed by the county or district attorney
[23:00.240 --> 23:02.240]  Based upon that complaint
[23:02.240 --> 23:06.240]  And a presentment and indictment by a grand jury
[23:06.240 --> 23:09.240]  To and by a grand jury
[23:09.240 --> 23:12.240]  Charging you with the offense
[23:12.240 --> 23:16.240]  They amended it and removed that requirement for misdemeanors
[23:16.240 --> 23:21.240]  In fact, they've made it where you don't even have to have
[23:21.240 --> 23:24.240]  An information for class C misdemeanors
[23:24.240 --> 23:28.240]  Even though you have to have them for A and B misdemeanors
[23:28.240 --> 23:30.240]  Now
[23:30.240 --> 23:34.240]  If you studied the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Texas Constitution
[23:34.240 --> 23:39.240]  You know that that is invalid
[23:39.240 --> 23:43.240]  They can't prosecute you for any crime
[23:43.240 --> 23:49.240]  In the state of Texas without filing a valid information
[23:49.240 --> 23:54.240]  And the reason they're doing it is because of a very early
[23:54.240 --> 23:59.240]  Onset case back in the 60s or 70s I think it was
[23:59.240 --> 24:04.240]  By the Court of Criminal Appeals that declared without any legal authority
[24:04.240 --> 24:06.240]  Whatsoever
[24:06.240 --> 24:10.240]  That class C's did not require an information to be filed
[24:10.240 --> 24:13.240]  Which is completely false
[24:13.240 --> 24:16.240]  There is not one part of the Code of Criminal Procedure
[24:16.240 --> 24:21.240]  With the Texas Constitution that makes that opinion accurate
[24:21.240 --> 24:25.240]  It's not based on anything in law
[24:25.240 --> 24:30.240]  In fact, it is an opinion that directly violates the law
[24:30.240 --> 24:33.240]  In every way possible
[24:33.240 --> 24:36.240]  So until we get some colors on the board
[24:36.240 --> 24:41.240]  What I'm going to be doing is explaining to you exactly how that works
[24:41.240 --> 24:43.240]  Okay
[24:43.240 --> 24:46.240]  Within the Texas Constitution
[24:46.240 --> 24:49.240]  We have Article 5, Section 12
[24:49.240 --> 24:52.240]  And in Article 5, Section 12 it reads
[24:52.240 --> 24:58.240]  Judges to be conservators of the peace, indictments, and information
[24:58.240 --> 24:59.240]  Okay
[24:59.240 --> 25:02.240]  So right here in Article 5, Section 12
[25:02.240 --> 25:07.240]  It tells us right off the bat about indictments and information
[25:07.240 --> 25:08.240]  And this is what it reads
[25:08.240 --> 25:10.240]  Subsection 8
[25:10.240 --> 25:13.240]  All judges of courts of this state by virtue of their office
[25:13.240 --> 25:18.240]  Are conservators of the peace throughout the state
[25:18.240 --> 25:20.240]  Okay
[25:20.240 --> 25:22.240]  Subsection B
[25:22.240 --> 25:25.240]  An indictment is a written instrument presented to a court
[25:25.240 --> 25:30.240]  By a grand jury charging a person with the commission of an offense
[25:30.240 --> 25:33.240]  And information is a written instrument presented to a court
[25:33.240 --> 25:36.240]  By an attorney for the state
[25:36.240 --> 25:40.240]  Charging a person with the commission of an offense
[25:40.240 --> 25:45.240]  The practice and procedures relating to the use of indictments
[25:45.240 --> 25:48.240]  And information including their contents
[25:48.240 --> 25:55.240]  Amendments, sufficiency, and requisites are as provided by law
[25:55.240 --> 25:59.240]  The presentment of an indictment or information to a court
[25:59.240 --> 26:02.240]  Invest the court with jurisdiction of the cause
[26:02.240 --> 26:05.240]  Now let's look at what this really tells us here
[26:05.240 --> 26:07.240]  Subsection A as it begins
[26:07.240 --> 26:10.240]  All judges of courts of this state
[26:10.240 --> 26:13.240]  And then we jump down to Parts of Subsection B
[26:13.240 --> 26:17.240]  Part that says are as provided by law
[26:17.240 --> 26:21.240]  The presentment of information to a court
[26:21.240 --> 26:25.240]  Invest the court with jurisdiction of the cause
[26:25.240 --> 26:30.240]  Now even though this article lets the legislature set by law
[26:30.240 --> 26:34.240]  How the information and indictments are to be used
[26:34.240 --> 26:36.240]  What they must contain
[26:36.240 --> 26:38.240]  How they can be amended
[26:38.240 --> 26:42.240]  And what makes them sufficient
[26:42.240 --> 26:46.240]  And thus determining all of the requisites
[26:46.240 --> 26:50.240]  For each of those things
[26:50.240 --> 26:54.240]  This constitutional clause specifically says
[26:54.240 --> 26:59.240]  That the information or the indictment
[26:59.240 --> 27:02.240]  Are what prisons are actually
[27:02.240 --> 27:06.240]  Invest the courts with jurisdiction
[27:06.240 --> 27:09.240]  Doesn't mention a complaint here at all
[27:09.240 --> 27:11.240]  Never says a complaint
[27:11.240 --> 27:13.240]  Invest the court with jurisdiction
[27:13.240 --> 27:16.240]  This specifically says the presentment
[27:16.240 --> 27:22.240]  Of an indictment or information to a court
[27:22.240 --> 27:26.240]  Invest the court with jurisdiction of the cause
[27:26.240 --> 27:30.240]  So absent a valid information
[27:30.240 --> 27:33.240]  Under this clause of the Texas Constitution
[27:33.240 --> 27:37.240]  No court can be invested with jurisdiction
[27:37.240 --> 27:40.240]  Of a criminal case without an information
[27:40.240 --> 27:43.240]  At a minimum
[27:43.240 --> 27:46.240]  A complaint alone is not sufficient
[27:46.240 --> 27:50.240]  Why? Because here it says the information is what does it
[27:50.240 --> 27:54.240]  And the information by law is required to be based upon the complaint
[27:54.240 --> 27:58.240]  Hence the complaint must come first
[27:58.240 --> 28:02.240]  But it does nothing to validate the process
[28:02.240 --> 28:05.240]  And procedures involved in prosecuting the case
[28:05.240 --> 28:09.240]  Until it has been reduced
[28:09.240 --> 28:13.240]  By an attorney for the state
[28:13.240 --> 28:15.240]  And presented to a court
[28:15.240 --> 28:17.240]  Let's go a little further in this
[28:17.240 --> 28:19.240]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure states
[28:19.240 --> 28:21.240]  How an information must be created
[28:21.240 --> 28:24.240]  And filed with a court
[28:24.240 --> 28:29.240]  Article 1.4 or 1.141
[28:29.240 --> 28:32.240]  Waiver of indictment for non-capital felony
[28:32.240 --> 28:34.240]  A person represented by legal counsel
[28:34.240 --> 28:36.240]  May in open court a by-written instrument
[28:36.240 --> 28:39.240]  Voluntarily waive the right to be accused
[28:39.240 --> 28:42.240]  By indictment of any offense
[28:42.240 --> 28:44.240]  Other than a capital felony
[28:44.240 --> 28:47.240]  On a waiver as provided in this article
[28:47.240 --> 28:52.240]  The accused shall be charged by information
[28:52.240 --> 28:54.240]  Okay?
[28:54.240 --> 28:57.240]  So this is for a non-capital felony
[28:57.240 --> 29:00.240]  Information is required
[29:00.240 --> 29:04.240]  Article 2.05 when complaint is made
[29:04.240 --> 29:07.240]  If the offense be a misdemeanor
[29:07.240 --> 29:10.240]  The attorney shall forthwith prepare an information
[29:10.240 --> 29:12.240]  Based upon such complaint
[29:12.240 --> 29:15.240]  And file the same in the court having jurisdiction
[29:15.240 --> 29:18.240]  Provided that in counties having no county attorney
[29:18.240 --> 29:21.240]  Misdemeanor cases may be tried upon
[29:21.240 --> 29:23.240]  Complaint alone without an information
[29:23.240 --> 29:26.240]  Provided, however, in counties having one or more
[29:26.240 --> 29:28.240]  Criminal district courts an information
[29:28.240 --> 29:31.240]  Must be filed in each misdemeanor case
[29:31.240 --> 29:34.240]  Okay?
[29:37.240 --> 29:40.240]  Alright, we'll be right back after this break
[29:40.240 --> 29:44.240]  Calling number 512-646-1984
[29:44.240 --> 29:46.240]  Give us a call getting live
[29:46.240 --> 29:48.240]  Or we will continue this when we get back
[29:48.240 --> 30:02.240]  So y'all hold on
[30:02.240 --> 30:05.240]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI
[30:05.240 --> 30:08.240]  May very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit
[30:08.240 --> 30:10.240]  Look at your Catherine Albrecht
[30:10.240 --> 30:12.240]  And I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers
[30:12.240 --> 30:15.240]  And a government cover-up in a moment
[30:15.240 --> 30:17.240]  Privacy is under attack
[30:17.240 --> 30:19.240]  When you give up data about yourself
[30:19.240 --> 30:21.240]  You'll never get it back again
[30:21.240 --> 30:23.240]  And once your privacy is gone
[30:23.240 --> 30:25.240]  You'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[30:25.240 --> 30:27.240]  So protect your rights
[30:27.240 --> 30:30.240]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[30:30.240 --> 30:33.240]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[30:33.240 --> 30:35.240]  This public service announcement is brought to you by
[30:35.240 --> 30:37.240]  StartPage.com
[30:37.240 --> 30:39.240]  The private search engine alternative
[30:39.240 --> 30:41.240]  To Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[30:41.240 --> 30:44.240]  Start over with StartPage
[30:44.240 --> 30:46.240]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:46.240 --> 30:49.240]  It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue
[30:49.240 --> 30:51.240]  And it's apparently big business
[30:51.240 --> 30:53.240]  In the Sunshine State of Florida
[30:53.240 --> 30:55.240]  This case involves breathalysers
[30:55.240 --> 30:57.240]  Used to convict thousands of Florida motorists
[30:57.240 --> 30:59.240]  For DUI violations
[30:59.240 --> 31:01.240]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices
[31:01.240 --> 31:03.240]  Were improperly calibrated
[31:03.240 --> 31:06.240]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years
[31:06.240 --> 31:07.240]  But did nothing
[31:07.240 --> 31:10.240]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program
[31:10.240 --> 31:13.240]  Ordered inspectors not to document the problem
[31:13.240 --> 31:16.240]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life
[31:16.240 --> 31:18.240]  But now that the cover-up has been exposed
[31:18.240 --> 31:21.240]  Perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier
[31:21.240 --> 31:23.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[31:23.240 --> 31:26.240]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[31:30.240 --> 31:31.240]  This is Building 7
[31:31.240 --> 31:33.240]  A 47-story skyscraper
[31:33.240 --> 31:35.240]  That fell on the afternoon of September 11
[31:35.240 --> 31:37.240]  The government says that fire brought it down
[31:37.240 --> 31:40.240]  However, 1500 architects and engineers
[31:40.240 --> 31:43.240]  Have concluded it was a controlled demolition
[31:43.240 --> 31:45.240]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members
[31:45.240 --> 31:46.240]  Have given their lives
[31:46.240 --> 31:48.240]  And thousands of my fellow first responders have died
[31:48.240 --> 31:50.240]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[31:50.240 --> 31:51.240]  I'm a structural engineer
[31:51.240 --> 31:52.240]  I'm a New York City correctional
[31:52.240 --> 31:53.240]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[31:53.240 --> 31:55.240]  I am a father who lost his son
[31:55.240 --> 31:56.240]  We are Americans
[31:56.240 --> 31:58.240]  And we deserve the truth
[31:58.240 --> 32:01.240]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[32:01.240 --> 32:05.240]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar
[32:05.240 --> 32:07.240]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society
[32:07.240 --> 32:09.240]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[32:09.240 --> 32:12.240]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[32:12.240 --> 32:15.240]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[32:15.240 --> 32:17.240]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[32:17.240 --> 32:19.240]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[32:19.240 --> 32:22.240]  The traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:22.240 --> 32:25.240]  To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[32:25.240 --> 32:27.240]  Former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig
[32:27.240 --> 32:28.240]  In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[32:28.240 --> 32:31.240]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.240 --> 32:33.240]  That will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.240 --> 32:35.240]  And how to hold the courts to the rule of law
[32:35.240 --> 32:37.240]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:37.240 --> 32:40.240]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[32:40.240 --> 32:42.240]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[32:42.240 --> 32:45.240]  The Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie
[32:45.240 --> 32:47.240]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[32:47.240 --> 32:50.240]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[32:50.240 --> 32:52.240]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:52.240 --> 32:54.240]  From ruleoflawradio.com
[32:54.240 --> 32:57.240]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society
[32:57.240 --> 32:59.240]  We all want and deserve
[33:02.240 --> 33:04.240]  Live free speech radio
[33:04.240 --> 33:07.240]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:34.240 --> 33:48.240]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio
[33:48.240 --> 33:53.240]  Call in number 512-646-1984
[33:53.240 --> 33:58.240]  Okay, hopefully this all panned out okay
[33:58.240 --> 34:00.240]  I was in such a rush to get all this done
[34:00.240 --> 34:02.240]  I missed a setup issue here tonight
[34:02.240 --> 34:05.240]  And I hope the mic went out like it was supposed to
[34:05.240 --> 34:09.240]  I've got that corrected so we will see
[34:09.240 --> 34:12.240]  All right, in the meantime while we're still waiting on callers
[34:12.240 --> 34:15.240]  Let's get back to what we were reading here
[34:15.240 --> 34:21.240]  Okay, now notice that if we have one or more criminal district courts
[34:21.240 --> 34:27.240]  In a county, there must be an information filed in each misdemeanor case
[34:27.240 --> 34:30.240]  And it doesn't say anything about what class of misdemeanor
[34:30.240 --> 34:33.240]  It just says each misdemeanor case
[34:33.240 --> 34:36.240]  Now I know this is something we went over a long time ago
[34:36.240 --> 34:41.240]  Back over the years we went over it
[34:41.240 --> 34:44.240]  But none of it has changed folks
[34:44.240 --> 34:50.240]  Nothing about what they're doing wrong has ever changed
[34:50.240 --> 34:53.240]  They've gone back and amended some of the other statutes
[34:53.240 --> 34:55.240]  To cover their butts about the things
[34:55.240 --> 34:57.240]  Some of the things they've been doing wrong
[34:57.240 --> 35:01.240]  Like issuing warrants for failure to appear on these citations
[35:01.240 --> 35:05.240]  They fixed that problem kind of
[35:05.240 --> 35:09.240]  But they've never addressed the illegal prosecution
[35:09.240 --> 35:12.240]  In municipal courts by city attorneys
[35:12.240 --> 35:16.240]  They've never addressed the illegal prosecution of a city attorney
[35:16.240 --> 35:18.240]  Without an information
[35:18.240 --> 35:22.240]  Because a city attorney is not an attorney for the state
[35:22.240 --> 35:27.240]  By any definition
[35:27.240 --> 35:30.240]  And can't prosecute in the name of the state
[35:30.240 --> 35:31.240]  Why?
[35:31.240 --> 35:34.240]  Because the state constitution specifically identifies
[35:34.240 --> 35:38.240]  And assigns the prosecutorial power of the state
[35:38.240 --> 35:41.240]  To two elected officials
[35:41.240 --> 35:43.240]  The county and district attorney
[35:43.240 --> 35:48.240]  And specifically identifies those two offices
[35:48.240 --> 35:50.240]  As being attorneys for the state
[35:50.240 --> 35:54.240]  A city attorney does not fall into that category
[35:54.240 --> 35:58.240]  And nowhere in law or the constitution
[35:58.240 --> 36:03.240]  Where the legislature was given the power to create courts by statute
[36:03.240 --> 36:11.240]  No power was given to them to create attorneys for the state by statute
[36:11.240 --> 36:12.240]  None
[36:14.240 --> 36:17.240]  The power to prosecute in the name of the state
[36:17.240 --> 36:23.240]  Is and always has been a constitutionally delegated power
[36:23.240 --> 36:26.240]  And because it's a judicial power
[36:26.240 --> 36:28.240]  Well, I guess I shouldn't say judicial
[36:28.240 --> 36:36.240]  Because it's invested directly and specifically in county and district attorneys
[36:36.240 --> 36:41.240]  It's not something the legislature can do what they want with
[36:41.240 --> 36:44.240]  They can't create attorneys for the state
[36:44.240 --> 36:49.240]  To prosecute in the name of the state out of city attorneys
[36:49.240 --> 36:50.240]  Just can't do it
[36:50.240 --> 36:53.240]  They can't do it for hired gun attorneys
[36:53.240 --> 36:59.240]  They have to be someone that is operating under and through the authority
[36:59.240 --> 37:03.240]  Of the county or district attorney's office
[37:03.240 --> 37:10.240]  And city attorneys and hired gun attorneys don't qualify for that at all
[37:10.240 --> 37:17.240]  Now, not only do we have 1.141 and article 2.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
[37:17.240 --> 37:19.240]  We have many, many more
[37:19.240 --> 37:22.240]  Let's look at article 12.02
[37:22.240 --> 37:25.240]  Misdemeanors
[37:25.240 --> 37:30.240]  An indictment or information for any misdemeanor
[37:30.240 --> 37:35.240]  May be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense
[37:35.240 --> 37:37.240]  And not afterward
[37:37.240 --> 37:39.240]  Got it?
[37:39.240 --> 37:42.240]  Article 12.07
[37:42.240 --> 37:45.240]  An information is presented when
[37:45.240 --> 37:56.240]  An information is considered as presented when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court
[37:56.240 --> 38:00.240]  Again, the proper officer is an attorney for the state
[38:00.240 --> 38:05.240]  An attorney for the state is the county or district attorney
[38:05.240 --> 38:09.240]  They are the only ones that can file an information
[38:09.240 --> 38:11.240]  How do we know this?
[38:11.240 --> 38:14.240]  We'll tell you that here in just a second
[38:14.240 --> 38:17.240]  Article 13.16
[38:17.240 --> 38:21.240]  Where it talks about criminal non-support
[38:21.240 --> 38:23.240]  Okay, child support
[38:23.240 --> 38:29.240]  Criminal non-support may be prosecuted in the county where the offended spouse or child is residing
[38:29.240 --> 38:36.240]  At the time the information or indictment is presented
[38:36.240 --> 38:40.240]  That's the only way they can prosecute you for child support failure
[38:40.240 --> 38:43.240]  Is information or indictment
[38:43.240 --> 38:44.240]  Okay?
[38:44.240 --> 38:48.240]  Article 21.20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
[38:48.240 --> 38:51.240]  Information
[38:51.240 --> 38:56.240]  An information is a written statement filed and presented
[38:56.240 --> 39:01.240]  In behalf of the state by the district or county attorney
[39:01.240 --> 39:05.240]  There is your proper officer
[39:05.240 --> 39:13.240]  Charging the defendant with an offense which may by law be so prosecuted
[39:13.240 --> 39:18.240]  So you see the Code of Criminal Procedure says a complaint charges someone with an offense
[39:18.240 --> 39:22.240]  That's not true. That's a misuse of terminology
[39:22.240 --> 39:28.240]  The complaint makes an allegation against an individual
[39:28.240 --> 39:33.240]  But it is not sufficient to charge them
[39:33.240 --> 39:41.240]  It's an allegation only until it is investigated or turned over to a proper officer
[39:41.240 --> 39:51.240]  In the form of a county or district attorney to be reduced in writing to an information
[39:51.240 --> 39:56.240]  That's exactly what 2.05 says they have to do with it
[39:56.240 --> 40:02.240]  If the offense be a misdemeanor, the attorney meeting the prosecutor, the county or district attorney
[40:02.240 --> 40:09.240]  Shall forthwith prepare an information based upon such complaint
[40:09.240 --> 40:16.240]  You see, those two are inextricably intertwined and wholly dependent
[40:16.240 --> 40:20.240]  No complaint and information is impossible
[40:20.240 --> 40:27.240]  No information of prosecution on a complaint alone is impossible
[40:27.240 --> 40:36.240]  Unless the county you're in does not have one or more criminal district courts
[40:36.240 --> 40:40.240]  Which means it won't have a county or district attorney
[40:40.240 --> 40:44.240]  The problem there is is that we don't have any counties in Texas
[40:44.240 --> 40:53.240]  That are not under the jurisdiction of some county or district attorney to prosecute crimes therein
[40:53.240 --> 40:56.240]  Okay?
[40:56.240 --> 41:02.240]  If that were the case, every Tom, Dick and Harry criminal in Texas would
[41:02.240 --> 41:06.240]  Headquarter themselves in counties without district courts
[41:06.240 --> 41:10.240]  And without the jurisdiction of a county or district attorney
[41:10.240 --> 41:16.240]  They couldn't be prosecuted for crimes as long as they stayed in that county
[41:16.240 --> 41:21.240]  If it worked the way they're treating it here
[41:21.240 --> 41:23.240]  You get it?
[41:23.240 --> 41:26.240]  Okay
[41:26.240 --> 41:32.240]  Now, 21.21 Requisites of an information
[41:32.240 --> 41:37.240]  An information is sufficient if it has the following requisites
[41:37.240 --> 41:40.240]  And it goes through a whole list, okay?
[41:40.240 --> 41:42.240]  But number nine is this
[41:42.240 --> 41:50.240]  It must be signed by the district or county attorney officially
[41:50.240 --> 41:54.240]  Now, why would the county or district attorney have to be the official
[41:54.240 --> 41:58.240]  In their official capacity who signs an information?
[41:58.240 --> 42:02.240]  Well, it goes right back to what I said before about who is a valid
[42:02.240 --> 42:09.240]  Constitutionally mandated attorney for the state
[42:09.240 --> 42:15.240]  They're the only two officers given the prosecutorial power of the state
[42:15.240 --> 42:17.240]  You get it?
[42:17.240 --> 42:24.240]  That's why they're the only officers that can sign an information in their official capacity
[42:24.240 --> 42:28.240]  They're the only ones that can produce one
[42:28.240 --> 42:30.240]  Okay?
[42:30.240 --> 42:35.240]  21.22 An information based upon complaint
[42:35.240 --> 42:43.240]  No information shall be presented until affidavit has been made by some credible person
[42:43.240 --> 42:46.240]  Charging the defendant with an offense
[42:46.240 --> 42:50.240]  In this case, charging is actually accusing
[42:50.240 --> 42:51.240]  Okay?
[42:51.240 --> 42:53.240]  That's what the affidavit does
[42:53.240 --> 42:57.240]  The affidavit is the verified complaint
[42:57.240 --> 43:02.240]  Or an officially signed and sworn statement
[43:02.240 --> 43:03.240]  Okay?
[43:03.240 --> 43:05.240]  Criminal statement
[43:05.240 --> 43:07.240]  Those two things can be used
[43:07.240 --> 43:10.240]  The statement can be used to create a complaint
[43:10.240 --> 43:16.240]  Or the complaint can be written and it be the affidavit
[43:16.240 --> 43:18.240]  Okay?
[43:18.240 --> 43:20.240]  And thus it's a verified complaint
[43:20.240 --> 43:26.240]  Then the information is based upon the verified complaint
[43:26.240 --> 43:33.240]  And the information or the indictment is what actually charges
[43:33.240 --> 43:36.240]  The defendant with an offense
[43:36.240 --> 43:43.240]  The complaint or the criminal statement only accuses the defendant of an offense
[43:43.240 --> 43:50.240]  Alright folks, once again, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number
[43:50.240 --> 43:57.240]  Give us a call and we will be right back
[44:20.240 --> 44:22.240]  Know what you should do for yourself
[44:22.240 --> 44:25.240]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course
[44:25.240 --> 44:27.240]  And now you can too
[44:27.240 --> 44:33.240]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience
[44:33.240 --> 44:38.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.240 --> 44:42.240]  About the principles and practices that control our American courts
[44:42.240 --> 44:49.240]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases
[44:49.240 --> 44:52.240]  Prosay tactics and much more
[44:52.240 --> 44:56.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.240 --> 45:01.240]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[45:01.240 --> 45:06.240]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends
[45:06.240 --> 45:10.240]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick
[45:10.240 --> 45:15.240]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air
[45:15.240 --> 45:19.240]  There's a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give
[45:19.240 --> 45:21.240]  Because I spent it all on supplement
[45:21.240 --> 45:23.240]  How can I help logos?
[45:23.240 --> 45:25.240]  Well, I'm glad you asked
[45:25.240 --> 45:28.240]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos
[45:28.240 --> 45:30.240]  With ordering your supplies or holiday gifts
[45:30.240 --> 45:32.240]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies
[45:32.240 --> 45:35.240]  Now go to LogosReguleNetwork.com
[45:35.240 --> 45:38.240]  Click on the Amazon logo and book market
[45:38.240 --> 45:44.240]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos
[45:44.240 --> 45:45.240]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.240 --> 45:46.240]  No
[45:46.240 --> 45:48.240]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.240 --> 45:49.240]  No
[45:49.240 --> 45:50.240]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[45:50.240 --> 45:51.240]  No
[45:51.240 --> 45:52.240]  I mean yes
[45:52.240 --> 45:56.240]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect
[45:56.240 --> 45:58.240]  Thank you so much
[45:58.240 --> 45:59.240]  We are Logos
[45:59.240 --> 46:24.240]  Happy Holidays Logos
[46:24.240 --> 46:26.240]  Alright folks, we are back
[46:26.240 --> 46:32.240]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling 512-646-1984
[46:32.240 --> 46:34.240]  Okay
[46:34.240 --> 46:39.240]  Now let's continue this on here one more time
[46:39.240 --> 46:44.240]  Now, no information shall be presented until Affidavit has been made by some credible person charging
[46:44.240 --> 46:48.240]  Accusing the defendant of an offense
[46:48.240 --> 46:50.240]  Article 21.22
[46:50.240 --> 46:54.240]  The Affidavit shall be filed with the information
[46:54.240 --> 47:02.240]  It may be sworn to before the district or county attorney who, for that purpose, shall have power to administer the oath
[47:02.240 --> 47:08.240]  Or it may be made before any officer authorized by law to administer oaths
[47:08.240 --> 47:11.240]  Article 21.23
[47:11.240 --> 47:16.240]  Rules as to indictment apply to information
[47:16.240 --> 47:23.240]  The rules with respect to allegations in an indictment and the certainty required apply also to an information
[47:23.240 --> 47:30.240]  In other words, just like with the complaint, all of the required elements of the alleged offense must be stated
[47:30.240 --> 47:33.240]  It must contain facts, not conjecture
[47:33.240 --> 47:43.240]  It must state everything that is required to be stated and proven in a court of law in order to convict for someone of the offense that it alleges they committed
[47:43.240 --> 47:45.240]  Okay
[47:45.240 --> 47:48.240]  Article 22.13
[47:48.240 --> 47:51.240]  Causes which will exonerate
[47:51.240 --> 48:00.240]  The following causes and no other will exonerate the defendant and his sureties if any from liability upon the forfeiture taken
[48:00.240 --> 48:03.240]  Number four of that list is
[48:03.240 --> 48:14.240]  Failure to present an indictment or information at the first term of the court which may be held after the principal has been admitted to bail
[48:14.240 --> 48:24.240]  In case where the party was bound over before indictment or information and the prosecution has not been continued by order of the court
[48:24.240 --> 48:26.240]  To get that
[48:26.240 --> 48:39.240]  If they don't present an indictment or information at the first term of the court which may be held after the principal, that means the accused has been admitted to bail
[48:39.240 --> 48:48.240]  In a case where the party was bound over, okay, bound over for trial
[48:48.240 --> 49:05.240]  Or I'm sorry, bound over before there was an indictment or information. In other words, they've given you bail, released you from jail, but you're bound over awaiting an indictment or information
[49:05.240 --> 49:07.240]  Okay
[49:07.240 --> 49:15.240]  And the prosecution itself for this purpose has not been continued by an order of the court
[49:15.240 --> 49:23.240]  If they fail to present that indictment or information at the first term of the court
[49:23.240 --> 49:27.240]  Then they have to dismiss the case
[49:27.240 --> 49:36.240]  Now do you know how many cases in Texas that statute impacts every single year?
[49:36.240 --> 49:54.240]  That statute right there would have solved the entire case for a friend of mine in San Antonio who was being threatened with a 15-year federal prison sentence for drug possession that was planted on them by a confidential informant of the San Antonio Sheriff's Department
[49:54.240 --> 50:04.240]  It was planted in their house by the confidential informant who worked for the Sheriff's Department so they could raid the house
[50:04.240 --> 50:12.240]  He's the one that got them their probable cause for a warrant because he knew the drugs were there because he planted them
[50:12.240 --> 50:18.240]  And yet after they raided their house, they got the drugs
[50:18.240 --> 50:24.240]  It was way past the first term of the court before they presented the indictment
[50:24.240 --> 50:32.240]  After they had released her on bail, having arrested her that same night
[50:32.240 --> 50:36.240]  Right then and there the case was required to be dismissed under this statute
[50:36.240 --> 50:38.240]  But it wasn't
[50:38.240 --> 50:42.240]  This is how well your public servants know and understand the actual law
[50:42.240 --> 50:43.240]  They don't
[50:43.240 --> 50:47.240]  If they tell you they do, they're lying out their backsides
[50:47.240 --> 50:50.240]  Okay?
[50:50.240 --> 50:52.240]  25.04
[50:52.240 --> 50:54.240]  Code of Criminal Procedure
[50:54.240 --> 50:56.240]  In a misdemeanor
[50:56.240 --> 51:04.240]  In misdemeanors, it shall not be necessary before trial to furnish the accused with a copy of the indictment or information
[51:04.240 --> 51:10.240]  But he or his counsel may demand a copy which shall be given as early as possible
[51:10.240 --> 51:14.240]  Now here's the problem with 25.04
[51:14.240 --> 51:20.240]  Since any prosecution in a court or any lawsuit in a civil side of a court
[51:20.240 --> 51:30.240]  acquires actual notice to the person being sued or the person being prosecuted
[51:30.240 --> 51:44.240]  I do not see how 25.04 can be even remotely constitutional when it says it's not necessary before trial to furnish the accused with a copy
[51:44.240 --> 51:46.240]  How is that possible?
[51:46.240 --> 51:48.240]  We can indict you?
[51:48.240 --> 51:50.240]  Do we have any information on you?
[51:50.240 --> 51:52.240]  We can prosecute you after that's done
[51:52.240 --> 51:58.240]  But we don't have to give you a copy of it unless you specifically ask us for it
[51:58.240 --> 52:02.240]  This is the problem with the court's interpretation of a right
[52:02.240 --> 52:06.240]  When the court says something is a right
[52:06.240 --> 52:12.240]  But only if the person to whom the right belongs demands it and fights for it
[52:12.240 --> 52:16.240]  There's something inherently wrong with the way they view a right
[52:16.240 --> 52:20.240]  By definition is something they are prohibited to violate
[52:20.240 --> 52:22.240]  By definition
[52:22.240 --> 52:26.240]  By constitutional decree
[52:26.240 --> 52:32.240]  Therefore how can it be the burden of the person to whom it belongs
[52:32.240 --> 52:34.240]  To invoke it
[52:34.240 --> 52:42.240]  When the Constitution already prohibits its violation by the government
[52:42.240 --> 52:48.240]  Can someone explain that basacra's mentality to me?
[52:48.240 --> 52:50.240]  The court says you have to demand it
[52:50.240 --> 52:54.240]  The Constitution says the government can't violate it
[52:54.240 --> 52:56.240]  If the government can't violate it
[52:56.240 --> 53:00.240]  Then it doesn't matter whether I demand it or not
[53:00.240 --> 53:02.240]  They can't violate it
[53:02.240 --> 53:04.240]  You would think that would be a common sense type of reasoning
[53:04.240 --> 53:06.240]  But no
[53:06.240 --> 53:08.240]  We don't do common sense here
[53:08.240 --> 53:10.240]  Not in this government
[53:10.240 --> 53:14.240]  Not in any government that I've seen lately
[53:14.240 --> 53:18.240]  Now we go from 2504 to 27.01
[53:18.240 --> 53:20.240]  Where again it speaks of indictment or information
[53:20.240 --> 53:22.240]  And it tells us this
[53:22.240 --> 53:26.240]  The primary pleading
[53:26.240 --> 53:30.240]  In a criminal action on the part of the state
[53:30.240 --> 53:32.240]  Is the indictment or information
[53:32.240 --> 53:34.240]  It is not the complaint
[53:34.240 --> 53:36.240]  Never was the complaint
[53:36.240 --> 53:38.240]  Never was the sworn criminal statement
[53:38.240 --> 53:42.240]  It was always an indictment or information
[53:42.240 --> 53:46.240]  So this takes us back to the obvious question on the court opinion
[53:46.240 --> 53:48.240]  By the court of criminal appeals
[53:48.240 --> 53:52.240]  The highest court on the criminal side in Texas
[53:52.240 --> 53:56.240]  How did the judges on that court come to the conclusion
[53:56.240 --> 54:00.240]  That they can invalidate every part of the law
[54:00.240 --> 54:02.240]  And every part of the Constitution
[54:02.240 --> 54:10.240]  To say that information is not required for class C misdemeanors
[54:10.240 --> 54:12.240]  When nothing in law says that
[54:12.240 --> 54:18.240]  In fact, everything we've seen here in law says exactly the opposite of that
[54:18.240 --> 54:22.240]  How did that become the norm?
[54:22.240 --> 54:24.240]  How did that become acceptable?
[54:24.240 --> 54:30.240]  How has it remained unchallenged?
[54:30.240 --> 54:38.240]  See, this is the things I'm hoping that this online class will help us alleviate
[54:38.240 --> 54:42.240]  Now I know the class has done a brave new book's work for people
[54:42.240 --> 54:46.240]  We had people go into court fighting and winning their cases
[54:46.240 --> 54:48.240]  They were getting them thrown out
[54:48.240 --> 54:50.240]  Or they were getting declared not guilty
[54:50.240 --> 54:54.240]  We caught the Austin Municipal Court and so much underhanded crap
[54:54.240 --> 54:58.240]  That they were doing behind the scenes it wasn't even funny
[54:58.240 --> 55:00.240]  We had one case
[55:00.240 --> 55:02.240]  A young lady I was working with
[55:02.240 --> 55:04.240]  Her name was Marnie Martinettes
[55:04.240 --> 55:06.240]  Very sweet lady
[55:06.240 --> 55:08.240]  Loved her to death
[55:08.240 --> 55:16.240]  She was being unlawfully prosecuted for a road rage crime
[55:16.240 --> 55:22.240]  That the Austin Police Department had no business charging her with
[55:22.240 --> 55:26.240]  Because they had no business investigating the accident
[55:26.240 --> 55:30.240]  That the law then let the charge stem from
[55:30.240 --> 55:36.240]  An accident that all the physical evidence proved she was not responsible for
[55:36.240 --> 55:44.240]  That it was the person in the other car who had in fact taken his big four wheel drive truck
[55:44.240 --> 55:48.240]  And tried to drive it over the front end of her car
[55:48.240 --> 55:54.240]  By making a right hand turn from the inside lane
[55:54.240 --> 55:58.240]  Or a four lane road
[55:58.240 --> 56:00.240]  In town
[56:00.240 --> 56:04.240]  You got two lanes going one direction, two lanes going the other direction
[56:04.240 --> 56:10.240]  He's on the inside lane, not the right hand lane, the left hand lane
[56:10.240 --> 56:16.240]  And tries to turn right at a light that they're both stopped at
[56:16.240 --> 56:20.240]  And in doing so drives right across the front of her car
[56:20.240 --> 56:22.240]  Breaks her axle
[56:22.240 --> 56:26.240]  And she still manages to force her car down the road with a broken axle
[56:26.240 --> 56:30.240]  To the point of almost burning it entirely up
[56:30.240 --> 56:36.240]  To make the kid in the truck pull over so they could call the cops
[56:36.240 --> 56:38.240]  And when the cops showed up
[56:38.240 --> 56:42.240]  They didn't even ticket the kid that drove across the front of her car
[56:42.240 --> 56:46.240]  They ticketed her
[56:46.240 --> 56:50.240]  They didn't listen to anybody, they didn't interview all the people that were witnesses
[56:50.240 --> 56:54.240]  Because this kid in the truck actually had several other girls in the truck with him
[56:54.240 --> 56:58.240]  That as soon as he pulled over they all bailed out and took off to the mall
[56:58.240 --> 57:02.240]  That they were going by at the time
[57:02.240 --> 57:04.240]  Okay
[57:04.240 --> 57:06.240]  They all ran into the mall and disappeared
[57:06.240 --> 57:10.240]  Cops didn't go looking for them even though they were material witnesses
[57:10.240 --> 57:14.240]  Well
[57:14.240 --> 57:16.240]  To make a long story short
[57:16.240 --> 57:20.240]  We go and we fight this in the Austin Municipal Court
[57:20.240 --> 57:24.240]  Help her get everything done
[57:24.240 --> 57:28.240]  Get all of her paperwork filed and she follows my instructions
[57:28.240 --> 57:32.240]  Finally someone who listened to me about keeping an eye on the court record
[57:32.240 --> 57:36.240]  She diligently went down there before trial
[57:36.240 --> 57:40.240]  Remember the last week before your trial I tell people to do everything
[57:40.240 --> 57:44.240]  If your trial is supposed to be on the last day of the week
[57:44.240 --> 57:48.240]  Then you need to check the court record Monday
[57:48.240 --> 57:52.240]  Wednesday and Thursday the day before trial if your trial is on Friday
[57:52.240 --> 57:54.240]  Okay
[57:54.240 --> 57:58.240]  And she did that
[57:58.240 --> 58:00.240]  Fortunate
[58:00.240 --> 58:06.240]  Okay, and I'll explain why it was fortunately and what we found when we get back on the other side of this break
[58:06.240 --> 58:08.240]  This is our top of the hour
[58:08.240 --> 58:12.240]  So it's a little bit longer break so it'll be a few minutes but we will be back
[58:12.240 --> 58:16.240]  In the meantime 512-646-1984
[58:16.240 --> 58:18.240]  If you want to call and talk
[58:18.240 --> 58:44.240]  Alright y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break
[58:48.240 --> 58:53.240]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[58:53.240 --> 58:57.240]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it
[58:57.240 --> 59:01.240]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[59:01.240 --> 59:06.240]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture
[59:06.240 --> 59:09.240]  Enter the recovery version
[59:09.240 --> 59:13.240]  First this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate
[59:13.240 --> 59:17.240]  But the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes
[59:17.240 --> 59:21.240]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[59:21.240 --> 59:27.240]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[59:27.240 --> 59:32.240]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[59:32.240 --> 59:43.240]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.240 --> 59:47.240]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[59:47.240 --> 59:50.240]  That's freestudybible.com
[59:50.240 --> 59:53.240]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[59:53.240 --> 01:00:16.240]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:00:23.240 --> 01:00:28.240]  And crypto is an order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52
[01:00:28.240 --> 01:00:31.240]  Ethereum $227.26
[01:00:31.240 --> 01:00:34.240]  XRP Ripple $0.33
[01:00:34.240 --> 01:00:36.240]  Lightcoin $100.31
[01:00:36.240 --> 01:00:41.240]  And Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of crypto coin
[01:00:41.240 --> 01:00:57.240]  In history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade
[01:00:57.240 --> 01:00:59.240]  Killing 10 and injuring 40
[01:00:59.240 --> 01:01:00.240]  Today in history
[01:01:00.240 --> 01:01:24.240]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEPA to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the earth for THC
[01:01:24.240 --> 01:01:33.240]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law
[01:01:33.240 --> 01:01:47.240]  Mr Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works
[01:01:47.240 --> 01:02:01.240]  As well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso
[01:02:01.240 --> 01:02:13.240]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup
[01:02:13.240 --> 01:02:22.240]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with
[01:02:22.240 --> 01:02:39.240]  A paper by Tulane University identified a 5.5 inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean
[01:02:39.240 --> 01:02:51.240]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow
[01:02:51.240 --> 01:03:10.240]  This is Wolf Rody with the Lowdown from July 22, 2019
[01:03:10.240 --> 01:03:33.240]  The growth of good ol' tomatoes and homemade wine and the country boy can survive
[01:03:33.240 --> 01:03:44.240]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Cool of Law Radio. Again, the calling number 512-646-1984
[01:03:44.240 --> 01:03:51.240]  Okay, now as I was saying, and I do see my caller up on the board, please hang on and let me get this finished and I'll take your call
[01:03:51.240 --> 01:03:59.240]  Alright, we were in court. She was checking the court record like she was supposed to do. Monday and Wednesday the court record was fine
[01:03:59.240 --> 01:04:07.240]  Everything was just the way we had seen it before. We had everything filed in the case. We were ready to go
[01:04:07.240 --> 01:04:16.240]  Thursday, the night before her trial, she went down to check the record one last time and it's a good thing she did
[01:04:16.240 --> 01:04:27.240]  Because that very night before, after she had gone and checked it and everything was okay, sometime that night, on Wednesday night
[01:04:27.240 --> 01:04:37.240]  The city attorney had quietly filed a dismissal of the original complaint and the original case against her
[01:04:37.240 --> 01:04:50.240]  The whole thing then turned around that same night and refiled a new complaint with a new cause of action number
[01:04:50.240 --> 01:05:10.240]  Making it an entirely new case, which means every single thing we had filed in rebuttal in the original case was no longer attached or had any value whatsoever in the new case
[01:05:10.240 --> 01:05:25.240]  Okay? She called me in a panic because it was 30 minutes before the clerk of the court closed up and she was downtown Austin
[01:05:25.240 --> 01:05:36.240]  Having to figure out what to do now that none of her legal pleadings had the same cause number as the new complaint that had been filed
[01:05:36.240 --> 01:05:48.240]  The old one had been dismissed. Now this by the way is highly illegal. It's highly illegal and we had just caught them at it red handed
[01:05:48.240 --> 01:06:03.240]  So I told her to get copies of the dismissal, the signed dismissal order and the new cause that had been filed in the court
[01:06:03.240 --> 01:06:14.240]  Which she did. Then I told her to get the court clerk to print out copies of every pleading we had already filed
[01:06:14.240 --> 01:06:21.240]  Change the cause number and refile them right then and there
[01:06:21.240 --> 01:06:38.240]  So she did that too. The clerk printed out the copies of everything that we had already filed in the case. She changed the date and she changed the cause number on it to match the new cause number and made the clerk file it back in the system
[01:06:38.240 --> 01:06:56.240]  We also, while she was doing that, I immediately sat down at my computer and wrote a motion to dismiss the entire case and I cited all of these illegal acts by the prosecutor, the city attorney and the judge of the court
[01:06:56.240 --> 01:07:05.240]  That same judge by the way was Susan Statman, the one who is now the head judge of the municipal court
[01:07:05.240 --> 01:07:12.240]  This woman deserves to be disbarred and she was made their head judge
[01:07:12.240 --> 01:07:24.240]  In any case, we refiled everything. We accused the court of criminal conduct of conspiring with the city attorney to deprive her of her right of due process
[01:07:24.240 --> 01:07:40.240]  And we filed it. No questions. Just filed it. We also sent copies of everything we filed and what we had filed in that latest motion to one of the district judges here in Austin
[01:07:40.240 --> 01:07:58.240]  Well, we go to court the next day. Okay? Friday morning. We walk in. We do not even make it to our seat before the court announces her name. Okay?
[01:07:58.240 --> 01:08:17.240]  And they immediately say, please come up. Your case has been dismissed. So she walks up front. She gets her signed dismissal order from Susan Statman, the judge presiding over her case
[01:08:17.240 --> 01:08:35.240]  The judge who knew the case was illegal from the word go and had been illegally tampered with by both her and the city attorney and had they had gotten caught at it
[01:08:35.240 --> 01:08:48.240]  So they immediately dismissed her to get her out of there because of the document that I had helped her file the night before. That stated clear as day the crimes they were committing
[01:08:48.240 --> 01:08:54.240]  And we sent it to a district judge. I did anyway
[01:08:54.240 --> 01:09:00.240]  And somehow this woman still wound up head judge of the Austin municipal court. Go figure
[01:09:00.240 --> 01:09:11.240]  So if you think the attorneys and the judges are interested in the law for your benefit, you are sadly and grossly mistaken
[01:09:11.240 --> 01:09:24.240]  They will make you its victim at every opportunity, especially when it lines the pockets of their employer, the city and the state, especially the city
[01:09:24.240 --> 01:09:34.240]  Because these courts are their biggest revenue generators bar none. That's exactly why the courts are illegal
[01:09:34.240 --> 01:09:48.240]  Did you know that there's a Texas Supreme Court case that says that municipal courts in Texas are unconstitutional and don't exist? And yet we still have them. Why is that? And how is it possible?
[01:09:48.240 --> 01:09:57.240]  And all they're doing by saying that the court does not get to keep any of the money that comes from the revenue generated by the citations
[01:09:57.240 --> 01:10:06.240]  The court itself doesn't get to keep it. The police department doesn't get to keep it. Therefore, it's not a conflict of interest
[01:10:06.240 --> 01:10:20.240]  That's baloney. Oh, it's so much horse crap in a barrel. Okay, why? Because what it amounts to is all the money they steal through these fraudulent courts and allegations
[01:10:20.240 --> 01:10:33.240]  Goes into a centralized fund for road and bridge maintenance, which means that they don't have to use money from other accounts to fund road and bridge
[01:10:33.240 --> 01:10:43.240]  They now get to take the money that would have had to go to road and bridge from the other accounts and funnel it into the police departments and the courts
[01:10:43.240 --> 01:10:53.240]  Now you need any other place in the world. You know what this is called? Money laundering
[01:10:53.240 --> 01:11:08.240]  It's racketeering on a grand scale and it's completely legal. It's legal money laundering. It's legal racketeering according to the Texas courts
[01:11:08.240 --> 01:11:22.240]  And yet it doesn't change. Why? Because those in power that have the responsibility to make it change are the ones benefiting the most from it. So why would they change it?
[01:11:22.240 --> 01:11:31.240]  See how that works? Alright, I'll probably pick this up on the next show unless I get to pick it up after our caller here
[01:11:31.240 --> 01:11:38.240]  Alright, we have a call. It is from Adam in Texas. Adam, what can we do for you?
[01:11:38.240 --> 01:11:43.240]  No, man, pick it up. I want to keep listening. It's awesome.
[01:11:43.240 --> 01:11:45.240]  Well, I've already got you. What do you got?
[01:11:45.240 --> 01:11:53.240]  Don't y'all roll. Keep going. Okay, well hang on in and I'll get right back to you.
[01:11:53.240 --> 01:12:10.240]  Okay, now besides 27.01 saying the primary pleading in a criminal action is the indictment or information, we go down to government code section 30.000126
[01:12:10.240 --> 01:12:24.240]  Complaint pleading. Complaints and pleadings must substantially conform to the relevant provisions of chapters 27 and 45 code of criminal procedure.
[01:12:24.240 --> 01:12:37.240]  Now I just told you what chapter 27 says. Primary pleading in a criminal action is the indictment or information and 45 only deals with a complaint, not with an information.
[01:12:37.240 --> 01:12:48.240]  But what it says about a complaint is essentially the exact same thing it says about a complaint in chapter 15.07 if I'm not mistaken.
[01:12:48.240 --> 01:13:00.240]  But there all it says is that the complaint is the instrument charging the accused with an offense, but the proper word is actually accusing the accused of an offense.
[01:13:00.240 --> 01:13:18.240]  Okay, and that language means the exact same thing in chapter 15 as it does in chapter 45. It does not create an exception for an information because the complaint that's filed under chapter 15 absolutely requires an information to be filed with it.
[01:13:18.240 --> 01:13:30.240]  So why wouldn't the one under chapter 45 require it? Because there is no provision in 45 that says an information is accepted by the law in these types of prosecutions.
[01:13:30.240 --> 01:13:42.240]  And in fact, the remainder of the law we're talking about 27.01 included says that it is the only pleading that gives jurisdiction and it is the primary pleading.
[01:13:42.240 --> 01:13:54.240]  So how are we failing at this to understand how this works? Or better yet, how are those responsible for knowing it, failing and understanding it?
[01:13:54.240 --> 01:14:05.240]  You want to see now why we'll never trust the opinion of a court or an attorney for anything? They can't frickin' read. They can't reason if the reason doesn't suit them.
[01:14:05.240 --> 01:14:19.240]  If they reason something through and it comes out to a conclusion they don't like, even though it's the one required by law, they ignore it and replace it with their own version of facts and reality.
[01:14:19.240 --> 01:14:31.240]  That's not justice and that damn sure is not a constitutionally delegated power. It is not proper for them to engage in that activity and yet they do it every single day.
[01:14:31.240 --> 01:14:52.240]  Alright, 27.02. Depleting and criminal actions. Defendance pleadings. The pleadings and motions of the defendant shall be, number one, a motion to set aside or an exception to an indictment or information for some matter of form or substance.
[01:14:52.240 --> 01:15:07.240]  Well, let's see. Is the fact that it doesn't exist a proper matter of form? Yeah, because it doesn't contain any of the requisites and information required to have because it has no form. Doesn't exist.
[01:15:07.240 --> 01:15:15.240]  Or substance. It doesn't allege anything because nobody made one. It doesn't exist.
[01:15:15.240 --> 01:15:30.240]  So, there is definitely an exception to an information in these cases for some matter of form, not or substance, but form and substance. It doesn't freaking exist.
[01:15:30.240 --> 01:15:35.240]  It has no form and no substance.
[01:15:35.240 --> 01:15:41.240]  Thus, jurisdiction is never conveyed.
[01:15:41.240 --> 01:15:48.240]  27.03 code of criminal procedure. Motion to set aside indictment.
[01:15:48.240 --> 01:16:01.240]  In addition to any grounds authorized by law, a motion to set aside an indictment or information may be based on the following.
[01:16:01.240 --> 01:16:16.240]  One of the list, that it appears by the records of the court that the indictment was not found by at least nine grand jurors or that the information was not based upon a valid complaint.
[01:16:16.240 --> 01:16:22.240]  Well, let's see. They file a valid complaint but don't produce an information.
[01:16:22.240 --> 01:16:28.240]  Is the information based upon a valid complaint when the information doesn't even exist?
[01:16:28.240 --> 01:16:34.240]  The logical answer to that unequivocally is hell no!
[01:16:34.240 --> 01:16:39.240]  It doesn't. It isn't. It can't be.
[01:16:39.240 --> 01:16:46.240]  Unless you're a judge in the court, in the state of Texas. Then of course that doesn't matter.
[01:16:46.240 --> 01:16:51.240]  The reality is whatever you declare it to be, not what actually is in the world around you.
[01:16:51.240 --> 01:16:58.240]  Y'all hang on. We'll be right back after this break and continue on.
[01:17:21.240 --> 01:17:26.240]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffics Seminar
[01:17:51.240 --> 01:18:00.240]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:05.240]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.240 --> 01:18:09.240]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.240 --> 01:18:15.240]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[01:18:15.240 --> 01:18:21.240]  Step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:18:21.240 --> 01:18:26.240]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:18:26.240 --> 01:18:29.240]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:18:29.240 --> 01:18:34.240]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:18:34.240 --> 01:18:39.240]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.240 --> 01:18:41.240]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.240 --> 01:18:49.240]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.240 --> 01:19:11.240]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:19.240 --> 01:19:25.240]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death.
[01:19:25.240 --> 01:19:33.240]  Hi folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:33.240 --> 01:19:38.240]  I've almost got this done so hang on and we will get back to our caller here in just a minute.
[01:19:38.240 --> 01:19:41.240]  I've only got a couple things left and we are ready for that.
[01:19:41.240 --> 01:19:49.240]  Now article 27.16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, plea of not guilty, how made?
[01:19:49.240 --> 01:19:55.240]  Subsection A, the plea of not guilty may be made orally by the defendant or by his counsel in open court.
[01:19:55.240 --> 01:20:01.240]  If the defendant refuses to plead, the plea of not guilty shall be entered for him by the court.
[01:20:01.240 --> 01:20:10.240]  In chapter 45 it specifically says that a plea is required to be entered in open court after the jury has been impaneled.
[01:20:10.240 --> 01:20:17.240]  And if it is refused by the defendant to enter a plea, then the court may enter a plea of not guilty.
[01:20:17.240 --> 01:20:21.240]  Again, everything here is about refusal.
[01:20:21.240 --> 01:20:28.240]  One cannot make a valid, considerable plea to an allegation without proper notice.
[01:20:28.240 --> 01:20:33.240]  Which once again goes back to the fact that A, you haven't been notified of what you are being charged with.
[01:20:33.240 --> 01:20:36.240]  Why would you even try to enter a plea to it?
[01:20:36.240 --> 01:20:41.240]  If they didn't give you a copy of the information or indictment, you've had no notice.
[01:20:41.240 --> 01:20:48.240]  You've had no notice, you must, you can only refuse to enter a plea.
[01:20:48.240 --> 01:20:51.240]  Okay, because what's another word for refuse?
[01:20:51.240 --> 01:20:55.240]  Look, I declined to enter a plea because the plea would be unconscionable.
[01:20:55.240 --> 01:20:58.240]  I have no information.
[01:20:58.240 --> 01:21:02.240]  I haven't been given proper notice.
[01:21:02.240 --> 01:21:12.240]  Once again, making any of these statues in Texas that do this crap unconstitutional on their face.
[01:21:12.240 --> 01:21:18.240]  Under this plea, evidence to establish the insanity of defendant, every fact, whatever, tending to...
[01:21:18.240 --> 01:21:20.240]  Oh, I'm sorry, wrong one.
[01:21:20.240 --> 01:21:28.240]  Subsection B, a defendant charged with a misdemeanor for which the maximum possible punishment is by fine only may,
[01:21:28.240 --> 01:21:35.240]  in lieu of the method provided in subsection A of this article, melt to the court a plea of not guilty.
[01:21:35.240 --> 01:21:40.240]  Okay, article 27.17, plea of not guilty construed.
[01:21:40.240 --> 01:21:46.240]  The plea of not guilty shall be construed to a denial of every material allegation in the indictment or information.
[01:21:46.240 --> 01:21:51.240]  Once again, the indictment and information does not exist.
[01:21:51.240 --> 01:21:56.240]  Therefore, there is nothing to deny.
[01:21:56.240 --> 01:21:59.240]  There's no allegation being made.
[01:21:59.240 --> 01:22:00.240]  Okay?
[01:22:00.240 --> 01:22:03.240]  Because these documents have not been filed.
[01:22:03.240 --> 01:22:09.240]  The complaint alone is completely insufficient.
[01:22:09.240 --> 01:22:11.240]  Okay?
[01:22:11.240 --> 01:22:19.240]  Under this plea, evidence to establish the insanity of defendant and every fact, whatever, tending to acquit him of the accusation may be introduced,
[01:22:19.240 --> 01:22:25.240]  except such facts as are proper for a special plea under article 27.05.
[01:22:25.240 --> 01:22:27.240]  Okay?
[01:22:27.240 --> 01:22:33.240]  So the very first thing we should be filing in these cases is a motion to dismiss.
[01:22:33.240 --> 01:22:34.240]  Okay?
[01:22:34.240 --> 01:22:35.240]  Why?
[01:22:35.240 --> 01:22:36.240]  Because there's no charging instrument.
[01:22:36.240 --> 01:22:39.240]  There's never been a charging instrument.
[01:22:39.240 --> 01:22:44.240]  There's never been a proper allegation before any court.
[01:22:44.240 --> 01:22:45.240]  Never.
[01:22:45.240 --> 01:22:54.240]  And the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals case that says otherwise needs to be challenged for invalidly interpreting the law.
[01:22:54.240 --> 01:23:02.240]  It is a complete and total fabrication of what the law says and means from the word go.
[01:23:02.240 --> 01:23:04.240]  No exceptions.
[01:23:04.240 --> 01:23:06.240]  Okay?
[01:23:06.240 --> 01:23:12.240]  This is the problem with your public service lying to your faces, people.
[01:23:12.240 --> 01:23:14.240]  They're very good at it.
[01:23:14.240 --> 01:23:18.240]  It's what they do, and they get away with it constantly.
[01:23:18.240 --> 01:23:27.240]  All right, now we're 512-646-1984, and we are ready to take Adam, our caller.
[01:23:27.240 --> 01:23:31.240]  All right, Adam, go ahead.
[01:23:31.240 --> 01:23:34.240]  Hey, man.
[01:23:34.240 --> 01:23:39.240]  I guess to start out, you know, it's like, they're just bullies.
[01:23:39.240 --> 01:23:47.240]  They're big dumb bullies, and everybody knows that once you start swinging back at a bully's nose,
[01:23:47.240 --> 01:23:53.240]  they don't bully you anymore, and that's exactly what happens once you get your head around the law and your rights.
[01:23:53.240 --> 01:23:55.240]  They're just morons.
[01:23:55.240 --> 01:23:57.240]  They'll do everything wrong, though.
[01:23:57.240 --> 01:24:06.240]  I mean, it's so easy to catch them violating your due process, violating their own rules, procedures, laws, all that stuff.
[01:24:06.240 --> 01:24:19.240]  So, I mean, two years back, I got a buddy who's gone off a manslaughter charge in district court simply by pointing out their inconsistencies
[01:24:19.240 --> 01:24:24.240]  and their unwillingness to provide him due process, including the examining trial and so on.
[01:24:24.240 --> 01:24:29.240]  I mean, they're not going to...they're not...they can't do it right.
[01:24:29.240 --> 01:24:30.240]  They can't.
[01:24:30.240 --> 01:24:31.240]  They can't.
[01:24:31.240 --> 01:24:33.240]  They're not capable of doing it right.
[01:24:33.240 --> 01:24:34.240]  So, it's really easy.
[01:24:34.240 --> 01:24:36.240]  I mean, class fees, that's how you start out, yeah.
[01:24:36.240 --> 01:24:40.240]  I mean, the county where I'm from, they won't pull me over and give me a ticket anymore.
[01:24:40.240 --> 01:24:41.240]  I'm free.
[01:24:41.240 --> 01:24:46.240]  I'm free to pretty much do whatever I want, because I don't break the law, but they're not...they're no mess with me.
[01:24:46.240 --> 01:24:53.240]  Well, you don't break the law in a way that they can use it against you because you're not engaging the things they would normally get everybody else for.
[01:24:53.240 --> 01:24:55.240]  Yeah, pretty much.
[01:24:55.240 --> 01:24:57.240]  I mean, they just...they won't mess with me anymore.
[01:24:57.240 --> 01:25:02.240]  I mean, I've got the respect that I deserve as an American citizen tax payer now because I earned it,
[01:25:02.240 --> 01:25:06.240]  and unfortunately, it shouldn't have to be that way, but it is that way.
[01:25:06.240 --> 01:25:11.240]  You know, if you want something, you've got to earn it, and that includes your rights as an American.
[01:25:11.240 --> 01:25:17.240]  You've got to go punch those bullies right in the mouth, and then they'll leave you alone forever, pretty much.
[01:25:17.240 --> 01:25:18.240]  Yeah.
[01:25:18.240 --> 01:25:22.240]  Now, you heard the announcement at the beginning of this show, right?
[01:25:22.240 --> 01:25:26.240]  I might have come in a few minutes late.
[01:25:26.240 --> 01:25:34.240]  I'm starting up online classes, and there are going to be subscription-only classes, but they will be relatively inexpensive.
[01:25:34.240 --> 01:25:39.240]  They won't cost more than my downtown class did, and eventually, hopefully, they'll be able to cost less.
[01:25:39.240 --> 01:25:44.240]  But once we get it all set up to do that, spread the word.
[01:25:44.240 --> 01:25:53.240]  Now, people go look at my legal blog, and at Rule of Law Radio, and try to find the button to join up and sign up for those classes once we get them going.
[01:25:53.240 --> 01:25:54.240]  Yeah.
[01:25:54.240 --> 01:25:57.240]  Everybody talk about that. Yeah, it's $15 or $20 per class.
[01:25:57.240 --> 01:25:58.240]  Right.
[01:25:58.240 --> 01:26:06.240]  That's how much the $20 a class is what it was down at Brave New Books, and we did one class a week.
[01:26:06.240 --> 01:26:17.240]  It ought to be $50 or $75 a class, because, I mean, the information you provide, I mean, everything is so worth it.
[01:26:17.240 --> 01:26:18.240]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:26:18.240 --> 01:26:19.240]  That's super-deep.
[01:26:19.240 --> 01:26:20.240]  That's cheap.
[01:26:20.240 --> 01:26:22.240]  God, that's cheap.
[01:26:22.240 --> 01:26:28.240]  Yeah, for the education you're getting and what you learn from it, and what is going to save you in the long run, it's dirt cheap.
[01:26:28.240 --> 01:26:41.240]  I mean, when you consider that all told, you're only, hell, you're paying, I mean, what, $7.85 an hour for an entire year subscription?
[01:26:41.240 --> 01:26:46.240]  That's all you're paying me for these classes, is $7.85 an hour.
[01:26:46.240 --> 01:26:51.240]  Okay, and that's if I charge the full $80 a month for it.
[01:26:51.240 --> 01:27:00.240]  If I charge $20 a class, just like I did down at Brave New Books, that's what it would come out to, $7.85 an hour.
[01:27:00.240 --> 01:27:16.240]  And to see the thing about it is, those months that have more than four weeks in them, which occasionally we will have, when the classes are actually done, you'll get extra classes here and there through the year, it actually comes out to less than that.
[01:27:16.240 --> 01:27:18.240]  Yeah.
[01:27:18.240 --> 01:27:23.240]  I guess I wanted to talk about the Four Corners Rule.
[01:27:23.240 --> 01:27:24.240]  Okay.
[01:27:24.240 --> 01:27:42.240]  As far as, I'm sure you're aware of it, yeah, as far as when a magistrate, you know, someone comes in and has a particular complaint, they bring a, you know, a sworn affidavit, you know, the Four Corners Rule is where they're only supposed to be making their decision on whether or not to issue the
[01:27:42.240 --> 01:27:50.240]  certain cheeser warrant or the arrest warrant based off the Four Corners of the affidavit that is put in front of them.
[01:27:50.240 --> 01:27:54.240]  They're not supposed to be making their decision based off anything else.
[01:27:54.240 --> 01:28:09.240]  So I wanted you to discuss the Four Corners Rule a little bit and also, you know, what can be thrown out in challenge as far as an invalid warrant, search warrant, it mainly is what I'm looking for.
[01:28:09.240 --> 01:28:21.240]  Well, the Four Corners Rule is actually a legal doctrine and it's a doctrine that basically says that the court is being asked to interpret a legal document or instrument of some kind.
[01:28:21.240 --> 01:28:22.240]  Okay.
[01:28:22.240 --> 01:28:28.240]  Whether it be in a civil case or for the purpose of probable cause for a warrant, things like that.
[01:28:28.240 --> 01:28:39.240]  The Four Corners Rule is what the court has to look at based upon what's written in the document itself with no outside evidence being allowed to be admitted.
[01:28:39.240 --> 01:28:47.240]  What is before them in the Four Corners of the written document is the only thing that matters to their conclusions.
[01:28:47.240 --> 01:28:50.240]  That's the way it's supposed to work.
[01:28:50.240 --> 01:29:07.240]  When a judge allows someone to file a probable cause statement for a warrant and they do it in person and they start augmenting the facts in the written statement with verbal facts that aren't in the statement.
[01:29:07.240 --> 01:29:13.240]  And the judge says, oh, okay, based upon a combination of the two, I'll issue the warrant.
[01:29:13.240 --> 01:29:16.240]  That's dead wrong.
[01:29:16.240 --> 01:29:25.240]  Because the statement of probable cause is what by law is required to support the issuance of that warrant.
[01:29:25.240 --> 01:29:35.240]  That is the sworn statement of the person requesting the warrant, not what they say verbally to the judge in addition to it.
[01:29:35.240 --> 01:29:42.240]  If the judge can't draw their conclusions from that statement, the judge shouldn't be drawing any conclusions at all.
[01:29:42.240 --> 01:29:49.240]  Hang on just a second. Let me get this break done and we'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[01:29:49.240 --> 01:30:00.240]  All right, folks. 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this break.
[01:30:00.240 --> 01:30:05.240]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth.
[01:30:05.240 --> 01:30:08.240]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.240 --> 01:30:12.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:39.240 --> 01:30:45.240]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:45.240 --> 01:30:49.240]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.240 --> 01:30:56.240]  I lay blank spaces on forms all the time or I write N slash A for not applicable and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.240 --> 01:31:03.240]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement.
[01:31:03.240 --> 01:31:08.240]  And I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me.
[01:31:08.240 --> 01:31:09.240]  And that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.240 --> 01:31:14.240]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.240 --> 01:31:18.240]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.240 --> 01:31:23.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:23.240 --> 01:31:35.240]  I lost my son, my uncle, on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:35.240 --> 01:31:39.240]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.240 --> 01:31:44.240]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.240 --> 01:31:47.240]  The official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:47.240 --> 01:31:51.240]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[01:31:51.240 --> 01:31:53.240]  and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.240 --> 01:31:56.240]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.240 --> 01:31:58.240]  Go to building what.org.
[01:31:58.240 --> 01:32:26.240]  Why it's health, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:26.240 --> 01:32:29.240]  Former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.240 --> 01:32:31.240]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.240 --> 01:32:35.240]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.240 --> 01:32:39.240]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:39.240 --> 01:32:41.240]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.240 --> 01:32:44.240]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.240 --> 01:32:48.240]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.240 --> 01:32:51.240]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.240 --> 01:32:55.240]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.240 --> 01:33:04.240]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:04.240 --> 01:33:33.240]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:34.240 --> 01:33:52.240]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:52.240 --> 01:33:57.240]  We have two more segments of this show. This one and the one coming up next.
[01:33:57.240 --> 01:34:04.240]  Call in number 512-646-1984 and we are currently talking with Adam in Texas.
[01:34:04.240 --> 01:34:11.240]  Adam, the thing about it is the Four Corners rule is how they should be reviewing land patents
[01:34:11.240 --> 01:34:14.240]  when we're going in to sue for these illegal property taxes.
[01:34:14.240 --> 01:34:19.240]  They should be reading the land patent language in the Four Corners of the document.
[01:34:19.240 --> 01:34:25.240]  The document itself makes it very, very clear the state of Texas has no claim to the land that is named in that patent.
[01:34:25.240 --> 01:34:27.240]  Not one iota.
[01:34:27.240 --> 01:34:37.240]  It also shows there is no reservation of any kind for the purpose of taxation or any other accessing used by the state.
[01:34:37.240 --> 01:34:39.240]  Not even eminent domain.
[01:34:39.240 --> 01:34:45.240]  It's completely outside of their jurisdiction to touch the land.
[01:34:45.240 --> 01:34:56.240]  Now it's within their jurisdiction to take you if you commit crimes on that land that violates state law but they can't touch the land.
[01:34:56.240 --> 01:35:02.240]  It's beyond their power according to the terms of the land patent.
[01:35:02.240 --> 01:35:07.240]  And yet you can't get a court in this state to read one. Why is that?
[01:35:07.240 --> 01:35:11.240]  You still there?
[01:35:11.240 --> 01:35:13.240]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:35:13.240 --> 01:35:18.240]  I know that land patent stuff. I've been reading the tax code a lot.
[01:35:18.240 --> 01:35:27.240]  But it's just these stuff. I really want to pursue that and get more involved on that side of the park.
[01:35:27.240 --> 01:35:29.240]  So it's back to the Four Corners rule.
[01:35:29.240 --> 01:35:45.240]  What if the assiant filed the probable cause after David? What if they're testing to something that the judge would be using to make their ultimate decision or not to issue the warrant?
[01:35:45.240 --> 01:35:54.240]  What if the assiant is testifying to something that they're not qualified and have no knowledge to testify about?
[01:35:54.240 --> 01:36:08.240]  Well, the thing about it is this, the probable cause statement is supposed to contain actual facts, not legal conclusions or presumptions.
[01:36:08.240 --> 01:36:16.240]  So when someone, say for instance, let's take a traffic case and someone's trying to get a warrant issued for it,
[01:36:16.240 --> 01:36:24.240]  every single thing in that probable cause statement is a legal conclusion or presumption by the person making it.
[01:36:24.240 --> 01:36:29.240]  There's no evidence to back up anything that's in that probable cause statement.
[01:36:29.240 --> 01:36:35.240]  It's based entirely upon the belief of the individual making it.
[01:36:35.240 --> 01:36:48.240]  So even though they're allowed to use their belief to make the probable cause statement, the requirement once you're in court is to actually provide evidence and support of that belief.
[01:36:48.240 --> 01:36:58.240]  And when they can't do that, the prosecution is supposed to fail for lack of evidence.
[01:36:58.240 --> 01:37:11.240]  So even if they're making a probable cause statement based upon a presumption or a conclusion, that's okay up to a point.
[01:37:11.240 --> 01:37:15.240]  And the point is when it actually goes to trial.
[01:37:15.240 --> 01:37:22.240]  Then what's in that probable cause statement is irrelevant without evidence to back it up.
[01:37:22.240 --> 01:37:24.240]  See what I'm saying?
[01:37:24.240 --> 01:37:26.240]  Yeah.
[01:37:26.240 --> 01:37:35.240]  Because it's like, for instance, you can file a probable cause statement and a criminal complaint against somebody for beating up their wife.
[01:37:35.240 --> 01:37:41.240]  If the wife confides in you that her husband is beating her, okay?
[01:37:41.240 --> 01:37:45.240]  And that's why she keeps showing up with black eyes and bruises.
[01:37:45.240 --> 01:37:49.240]  And she's afraid to file the complaint because it'll get worse.
[01:37:49.240 --> 01:37:53.240]  So you go file it on her behalf.
[01:37:53.240 --> 01:38:01.240]  Wouldn't that be you doing something that you don't have any actual power to testify to because you weren't present during the beatings?
[01:38:01.240 --> 01:38:03.240]  Yeah, that's true.
[01:38:03.240 --> 01:38:04.240]  Okay.
[01:38:04.240 --> 01:38:08.240]  But someone needs to file the complaint to get the ball rolling, right?
[01:38:08.240 --> 01:38:09.240]  That's right.
[01:38:09.240 --> 01:38:14.240]  And that's why it says any credible person can do that.
[01:38:14.240 --> 01:38:20.240]  Now, can you confirm that she's not lying to you about how she's getting those bruises at this point?
[01:38:20.240 --> 01:38:22.240]  Absolutely not.
[01:38:22.240 --> 01:38:32.240]  You're testing your conclusions only upon her testimony, not actual evidence beyond the visible indication of injury to her person.
[01:38:32.240 --> 01:38:40.240]  But you cannot testify as to the source of those injuries from actual firsthand accountability.
[01:38:40.240 --> 01:38:41.240]  Right?
[01:38:41.240 --> 01:38:42.240]  Right.
[01:38:42.240 --> 01:38:43.240]  Okay.
[01:38:43.240 --> 01:38:50.240]  So when it comes to the probable cause statement or the criminal complaint, personal knowledge is not a prerequisite.
[01:38:50.240 --> 01:39:00.240]  What's the prerequisite for personal knowledge is when you're going to take the stand and testify that everything in its factual and that you've got the evidence to support it.
[01:39:00.240 --> 01:39:04.240]  That's where they fail in so many of these cases.
[01:39:04.240 --> 01:39:18.240]  They take somebody's testimony as the only evidence, when in fact the testimony alone is almost always a personal opinion or conclusion that by the rules of evidence is inadmissible.
[01:39:18.240 --> 01:39:24.240]  But it has to be challenged as such.
[01:39:24.240 --> 01:39:26.240]  Yeah, under the rules of evidence.
[01:39:26.240 --> 01:39:28.240]  Yeah, it's got to be challenged.
[01:39:28.240 --> 01:39:30.240]  That's all we've got to keep studying.
[01:39:30.240 --> 01:39:32.240]  Exactly.
[01:39:32.240 --> 01:39:51.240]  Is it possible for a text magistrate to issue one search and cheese reward that encompasses five different properties and locations?
[01:39:51.240 --> 01:39:55.240]  Well, I don't know.
[01:39:55.240 --> 01:40:00.240]  It depends over what span of time.
[01:40:00.240 --> 01:40:06.240]  If there's simultaneous searches and seizures on the same day and time, probably.
[01:40:06.240 --> 01:40:15.240]  But if this is a warrant that covers individual searches and seizures over a period of time, almost certainly not.
[01:40:15.240 --> 01:40:18.240]  Period of time include over three days?
[01:40:18.240 --> 01:40:19.240]  Potentially so.
[01:40:19.240 --> 01:40:23.240]  The warrant could definitely be challenged if that's the case.
[01:40:23.240 --> 01:40:24.240]  Right.
[01:40:24.240 --> 01:40:28.240]  It just depends on, yeah, if you've got a good enough attorney.
[01:40:28.240 --> 01:40:30.240]  No one knows yourself.
[01:40:30.240 --> 01:40:35.240]  Yeah, or hopefully not yourself because you've been listening to this show for long enough.
[01:40:35.240 --> 01:40:38.240]  No, I see people all the time.
[01:40:38.240 --> 01:40:43.240]  They just believe that some attorney is going to help them.
[01:40:43.240 --> 01:40:47.240]  And they go, these attorneys, they just suck at people.
[01:40:47.240 --> 01:40:48.240]  Oh, yeah, sure.
[01:40:48.240 --> 01:40:49.240]  Give me this much money.
[01:40:49.240 --> 01:40:50.240]  Blah, blah, blah.
[01:40:50.240 --> 01:40:54.240]  And people really just does attorneys drop the ball.
[01:40:54.240 --> 01:40:58.240]  Yeah, well, there's something about these attorneys that most people don't realize.
[01:40:58.240 --> 01:41:05.240]  See, the way it works at every state that I'm aware of, and especially here in Texas because they do it all the time.
[01:41:05.240 --> 01:41:12.240]  When the attorney takes your money, the very first thing he's going to do is try to get you to stop talking to him.
[01:41:12.240 --> 01:41:16.240]  He's going to run the case however he wants to, whether it helps you or not.
[01:41:16.240 --> 01:41:18.240]  And no matter how you want it done.
[01:41:18.240 --> 01:41:24.240]  Okay, and the moment you open your mouth, he's going to try to get himself recused from your case by the judge.
[01:41:24.240 --> 01:41:27.240]  He's going to get the judge to release him.
[01:41:27.240 --> 01:41:33.240]  What needs to happen is, is that needs to be directly challenged by the individual when it happens.
[01:41:33.240 --> 01:41:45.240]  You file a complaint with the court stating that if the judge attempts to release your attorney from his contract with you, that you will sue the judge for tortuous interference.
[01:41:45.240 --> 01:41:56.240]  Why? Because the Texas Constitution specifically forbids in its bill of rights for the state to interfere with a contract.
[01:41:56.240 --> 01:42:05.240]  If you have a contract with an attorney you've paid to do a job, and he's just trying to take the money and run after you've paid him,
[01:42:05.240 --> 01:42:12.240]  and the judge is going to let him get away with it, sue the judge for tortuous interference.
[01:42:12.240 --> 01:42:19.240]  And say, you release this guy from his obligations to me, and I will sue him, and I will sue you.
[01:42:19.240 --> 01:42:31.240]  Him for breach of contract and malpractice, and you for tortuous interference with the contract that he breached.
[01:42:31.240 --> 01:42:33.240]  See how that flies.
[01:42:33.240 --> 01:42:46.240]  Because they have a problem trying to say that the judge is immune when the bill of rights specifically says, that's forbidden.
[01:42:46.240 --> 01:42:56.240]  Yeah. Yeah, there's so many, there's so many tools at our disposal to beat them with, it's hard to remember of all.
[01:42:56.240 --> 01:42:59.240]  Exactly. Why do you think I write them all down?
[01:42:59.240 --> 01:43:04.240]  Why do you think there's 400 plus legal pleadings in this seminar material? Everything went on paper.
[01:43:04.240 --> 01:43:08.240]  Every possible scenario you could come up with.
[01:43:08.240 --> 01:43:12.240]  And despite that, they still manage to keep coming up with new ones.
[01:43:12.240 --> 01:43:20.240]  Now that they're, now that it's illegal for them to issue warrants for failure to appear on the citation itself,
[01:43:20.240 --> 01:43:36.240]  since they changed Chapter 45, what they've gone to doing now is intentionally looking up old addresses so they can send the phone calls and or mail notices to an address you're no longer living at.
[01:43:36.240 --> 01:43:41.240]  And then they can issue a warrant when you don't show up for the court date they sent and don't tell you about.
[01:43:41.240 --> 01:43:47.240]  How you like them, Atlas?
[01:43:47.240 --> 01:43:51.240]  All right, Adam, anything else before we get to this break?
[01:43:51.240 --> 01:43:54.240]  If you got another call, I'll hand it over.
[01:43:54.240 --> 01:43:57.240]  I got two more when I get back, so thanks for calling in, man.
[01:43:57.240 --> 01:43:59.240]  Have a good one.
[01:43:59.240 --> 01:44:00.240]  Good bye.
[01:44:00.240 --> 01:44:06.240]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.240 --> 01:44:09.240]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.240 --> 01:44:17.240]  And it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.240 --> 01:44:25.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.240 --> 01:44:31.240]  Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.240 --> 01:44:39.240]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.240 --> 01:44:47.240]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, you're health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.240 --> 01:44:51.240]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.240 --> 01:45:00.240]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:00.240 --> 01:45:04.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.240 --> 01:45:07.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.240 --> 01:45:15.240]  The affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.240 --> 01:45:19.240]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.240 --> 01:45:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.240 --> 01:45:28.240]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:34.240]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.240 --> 01:45:43.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.240 --> 01:45:52.240]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.240 --> 01:46:01.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.240 --> 01:46:30.240]  I was bad to the bone. I was bad to the bone.
[01:46:30.240 --> 01:46:38.240]  You betcha to batook us I'm bad to the bone. That's why I do this stuff. I just happen to be good at it.
[01:46:38.240 --> 01:46:44.240]  And hopefully I'll be able to make you good at it, okay?
[01:46:44.240 --> 01:46:51.240]  All we gotta do is get these classes online, get you to participate, and we can make you good at it. All of you.
[01:46:51.240 --> 01:46:56.360]  please keep that in mind all right we got the next caller up which is
[01:46:57.080 --> 01:46:59.480]  Steven it appears Steven what could we do for you
[01:47:01.800 --> 01:47:08.600]  they're gonna be me that would be you all right there's those like uh Eddie a good
[01:47:08.600 --> 01:47:16.200]  to have you back again and uh wanted to ask y'all stop for your head and got an incident with uh
[01:47:16.200 --> 01:47:21.240]  uh with a uh Hillsborough police department here where I'm at
[01:47:22.440 --> 01:47:29.800]  nor they kept uh coming at me on a piece of property that my wife and I own saying it's not
[01:47:29.800 --> 01:47:36.840]  up to building code standards and I've got them every which way from Sunday but says my wife won't
[01:47:36.840 --> 01:47:43.960]  fight she won't do anything against the state that's that's her so they started writing her
[01:47:43.960 --> 01:47:48.680]  tickets because they can't come at me because I'm the only one that they get criminal whose
[01:47:48.680 --> 01:47:54.760]  name is on the property both of our names does that still count as retaliation when they come
[01:47:54.760 --> 01:48:01.400]  against my wife yeah after I filed criminal complaints yeah perfect that's what I needed
[01:48:01.400 --> 01:48:07.400]  I didn't know if it'd been a stab that was kind of established or not well whether or not it's
[01:48:07.400 --> 01:48:11.880]  established it's almost it's most certainly an allegation you can make that the tickets given
[01:48:11.880 --> 01:48:16.440]  to her are retaliatory if they weren't they'd still be coming after you which they know they
[01:48:16.440 --> 01:48:25.000]  can't do and win that's why they quit that's right okay no try but if both of your names are on the
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:33.400]  property correct then it may not matter who they issued the citation to since the action itself
[01:48:33.400 --> 01:48:39.080]  is against the person who owns the property or is in control of it that's both of you not just your
[01:48:39.080 --> 01:48:47.560]  wife for instance if they were trying to prosecute you as a tenant and not the landlord who owned it
[01:48:48.200 --> 01:48:54.360]  they wouldn't have a case against you as a tenant none they have to prosecute the landlord
[01:48:55.560 --> 01:48:58.280]  because their name is the one registered to the property
[01:49:01.800 --> 01:49:07.000]  so there's a good chance you can go to court and make the argument you have made an allegation
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  based upon this property and who controls it well both of us do
[01:49:16.680 --> 01:49:23.400]  right so I followed an original set of criminal complaints against the first couple of guys that
[01:49:23.400 --> 01:49:29.080]  came across it one was a fire marshal which I've already proven he has no training to be a uh
[01:49:29.080 --> 01:49:35.160]  be a code code enforcement officer according to the state he quit I mean he didn't quit but he quit
[01:49:35.160 --> 01:49:41.000]  putting his name on anything which tells me no he was up to no good I mean they they shielded him
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:45.880]  which I've got him on that they had him on multiple things I just really wanted to catch the angle
[01:49:45.880 --> 01:49:50.840]  where they're trying to hit her up because she'll do anything anything to make them supposedly go
[01:49:50.840 --> 01:49:54.520]  away and I'll try to tell her she ain't gonna listen you're not gonna make them go away all
[01:49:54.520 --> 01:49:59.000]  they're going to do is bleed money out of y'all through her if you let them get away with that
[01:49:59.560 --> 01:50:04.440]  but because both of your names are on the property and their actions against something
[01:50:04.440 --> 01:50:11.960]  relative to the property not the person right both of your names are on the property as long as that's
[01:50:11.960 --> 01:50:19.320]  the case then either of you should be able to go to court and fight the ticket okay all right
[01:50:19.320 --> 01:50:23.320]  that's one of the double checks which they did what they've always said there's not even a
[01:50:23.320 --> 01:50:27.960]  there's nothing but a citation supposedly in the file and I told her I'm not doing this thing
[01:50:27.960 --> 01:50:33.080]  I'm just going to go against her I'll freaking do it myself right but now what you should do
[01:50:33.080 --> 01:50:38.520]  is get a copy of the property record that shows that both names are on it okay they've already
[01:50:38.520 --> 01:50:42.760]  admitted that they have that they I mean they've already admitted that we both showing regardless
[01:50:42.760 --> 01:50:47.720]  of what they've admitted you get a copy and you keep a copy and every time you write a pleading
[01:50:48.280 --> 01:50:53.720]  that for a ticket that goes to your wife you make a copy of that document and stick it to the back
[01:50:53.720 --> 01:51:00.760]  of it as exhibit a of your standing to challenge the citation stand that you got you all right
[01:51:00.760 --> 01:51:07.480]  that's standing correct okay all right like I said I wanted to kind of get my head around another
[01:51:07.480 --> 01:51:13.000]  angle to come at a month uh I'm that much should most certainly be one because that's an action
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:21.880]  against something about the property not about the individual specifically okay all right sir
[01:51:21.880 --> 01:51:26.600]  I got a lot more homework due but I do appreciate it I'm working on my lawsuit so I definitely
[01:51:26.600 --> 01:51:35.400]  serve good luck with all of it thank you thank you all right folks now see tonight we've had the
[01:51:35.400 --> 01:51:45.560]  calls that show exactly why these online classes are necessary it also shows that I know what I'm
[01:51:45.560 --> 01:51:50.920]  doing I know what I'm talking about I've done this enough I've done it long enough I've helped enough
[01:51:50.920 --> 01:52:03.160]  people okay that I have no doubt about what I can and cannot teach you I have no doubt that no
[01:52:03.160 --> 01:52:12.280]  attorney will help you the way you can help yourself they will not even try not unless
[01:52:12.280 --> 01:52:17.080]  you're pouring buckets of money into their pockets that's the only time your attorney's
[01:52:17.080 --> 01:52:21.800]  going to do what's necessary to fight for you instead of with the other side against you
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:31.080]  it doesn't benefit them financially to wage war on your behalf in most cases
[01:52:33.880 --> 01:52:40.440]  and they will be the first ones to tell you that and anyone up to say anything different
[01:52:40.440 --> 01:52:48.520]  is blowing smoke up your hind in and watching it roll around behind your eyeballs they could care
[01:52:48.520 --> 01:52:54.280]  less what happens to you because they've got their money and then they think they can go
[01:52:54.280 --> 01:53:00.040]  in to see that judge and walk out with your money and never have to put a minute's worth of work
[01:53:00.040 --> 01:53:08.360]  into earning it but new slash the Texas Constitution Bill of Rights prohibits that judge
[01:53:08.360 --> 01:53:15.160]  from releasing that attorney from that contract once you have it the judge cannot legitimately
[01:53:15.160 --> 01:53:19.720]  interfere in the obligations of that contract between you and your attorney
[01:53:22.040 --> 01:53:26.120]  so no matter what excuse the attorney tries to give the judge about why he should be released
[01:53:26.120 --> 01:53:31.880]  from the case you need to argue that you're not allowing him to breach the agreement and you're
[01:53:31.880 --> 01:53:42.040]  not allowing the judge to interfere with everything the agreement requires that's tortuous interference
[01:53:43.160 --> 01:53:53.160]  okay not only in Texas is it tortuous interference with a contract it is an outright criminal act
[01:53:53.160 --> 01:54:01.000]  under the bill of rights it's actionable under the crimes of abuse of official capacity
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:09.240]  and official oppression and official misconduct okay judges can commit that just as well as any
[01:54:09.240 --> 01:54:14.760]  other public servant by their actions and that's exactly what they're doing they release your
[01:54:14.760 --> 01:54:21.160]  attorney from the case so you have to pay money to another one that's tortuous interference with
[01:54:21.160 --> 01:54:26.280]  your contract it's an abuse of official capacity because it violates the bill of rights it's official
[01:54:26.280 --> 01:54:32.520]  oppression because it violates the bill of rights under color of judicial procedure i.e.
[01:54:33.080 --> 01:54:44.600]  other law see how this works you're not going to learn this even in law school
[01:54:46.280 --> 01:54:50.760]  do you believe it law school does not teach you this
[01:54:50.760 --> 01:55:00.600]  law teaches you how to agree with a court opinion or how to argue against a court opinion
[01:55:01.320 --> 01:55:05.960]  but not how to look at the actual law and determine that both sides are wrong
[01:55:08.360 --> 01:55:10.840]  because they never comply with law in the first place
[01:55:13.560 --> 01:55:20.120]  they don't teach you alternative methods of accountability because they want the profession
[01:55:20.120 --> 01:55:23.160]  to look honorable when it is anything but
[01:55:26.280 --> 01:55:32.840]  a judge or prosecutor or defense attorney that won't comply with the law should not be allowed
[01:55:32.840 --> 01:55:39.400]  to practice it or sit on a bench they dang sure shouldn't be making money off of it
[01:55:40.840 --> 01:55:46.280]  and when you consider the fact that under the state bar act here in texas every single attorney
[01:55:46.280 --> 01:55:56.200]  is a de facto government official by their membership in the state bar then every one of
[01:55:56.200 --> 01:56:02.280]  them is a criminal embezzler because every one of them charges you for their services and puts
[01:56:02.280 --> 01:56:08.760]  that money in their own pocket while acting entirely under the color of an official office
[01:56:09.480 --> 01:56:15.720]  as a judicial officer of the state so they're actually using their government office and
[01:56:15.720 --> 01:56:24.920]  license to line their own pockets that's embezzlement people that too is abuse of official capacity
[01:56:24.920 --> 01:56:29.240]  and official oppression not to mention fraud
[01:56:31.960 --> 01:56:37.960]  see none of these people responsible for the law have a freaking clue what the law says and they
[01:56:37.960 --> 01:56:44.120]  dang sure don't know what it means and they certainly refuse to recognize the implications
[01:56:44.120 --> 01:56:53.000]  upon their actions for what they do so when the law is null and void when it suits them
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:57:01.240]  then we have no law at all and when we have no law at all then we have no one to enforce it
[01:57:01.240 --> 01:57:07.320]  we have no one to adjudicate it what we really have is anarchy in favor of one group
[01:57:07.320 --> 01:57:13.720]  and that's just wrong
[01:57:16.760 --> 01:57:24.120]  but they're not going to tell you what's the old saying no one is going to give you the education
[01:57:24.120 --> 01:57:34.120]  needed to overthrow them that's true of anyone in power over you anyone in power over you is
[01:57:34.120 --> 01:57:42.280]  never going to allow you to have the education necessary to overthrow them all you got to do
[01:57:42.280 --> 01:57:47.400]  is look around and see what's going on and know that to be true because this is stuff that everybody
[01:57:47.400 --> 01:57:55.880]  should know but no one does or those that should know don't care well it's up to us to make them
[01:57:55.880 --> 01:58:01.720]  care that's why these classes are coming back that's why we need to attend them that's why you need
[01:58:01.720 --> 01:58:09.880]  to subscribe to them and learn the bigger our army of people fighting back the more push back we
[01:58:09.880 --> 01:58:18.040]  can recruit and go forward with and make this stuff stop but without it just another victim
[01:58:19.720 --> 01:58:23.480]  all right folks it's been the money night rule of law radio show with your host jadie craig i
[01:58:23.480 --> 01:58:28.040]  want to thank all the callers and all the listeners out there y'all have a great week good night and
[01:58:28.040 --> 01:58:39.480]  god bless
[01:58:50.200 --> 01:58:56.600]  bibles for america is offering absolutely free a unique study bible called the new testament
[01:58:56.600 --> 01:59:02.040]  recovery version the new testament recovery version has over 9 000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.040 --> 01:59:08.440]  what the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god and to know the meaning of life order
[01:59:08.440 --> 01:59:17.160]  your free copy today from bibles for america call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us
[01:59:17.160 --> 01:59:25.160]  online at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13 000 cross
[01:59:25.160 --> 01:59:31.400]  references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the bible this is truly a bible
[01:59:31.400 --> 01:59:37.000]  you can understand to get your free copy of the new testament recovery version call us toll free
[01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:48.920]  at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:48.920 --> 01:59:56.040]  looking for some truth you found it logo radio network dot com