[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.520]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.720]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.720 --> 00:41.480]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.960 --> 00:52.440]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.440 --> 00:58.200]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.200 --> 01:07.400]  entering 40 today in history. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.400 --> 01:13.080]  1325 legalizing Hemp in a taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including
[01:13.080 --> 01:17.320]  Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even
[01:17.320 --> 01:21.400]  refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:21.400 --> 01:26.680]  or the laboratory equipment to test the error for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:26.680 --> 01:30.680]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and
[01:30.680 --> 01:35.400]  delivery of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials,
[01:35.400 --> 01:39.400]  including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on
[01:39.400 --> 01:44.520]  Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a
[01:44.520 --> 01:51.000]  misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney
[01:51.000 --> 01:57.240]  in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:57.240 --> 02:02.680]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue
[02:02.680 --> 02:07.640]  was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County who
[02:07.640 --> 02:12.120]  stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its
[02:12.120 --> 02:17.160]  chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what
[02:17.160 --> 02:26.280]  they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American
[02:26.280 --> 02:31.960]  pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second
[02:31.960 --> 02:37.720]  pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the
[02:37.720 --> 02:42.920]  East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from
[02:42.920 --> 02:49.640]  a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn
[02:49.640 --> 03:16.520]  into the glow. This was Brook Rody with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:16.520 --> 03:26.680]  Well, I received my remedy today. Came in the box just like they say. I accepted it for value
[03:26.680 --> 03:36.440]  right away. It's now two years, not later. We are originators and the pathway seems to get
[03:36.440 --> 03:42.120]  straighter. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Shouton, Willow Radio. We're talking to Nathan and
[03:42.120 --> 03:54.120]  Robert. Yes. Okay, Nathan and Robert in Washington. And they sound like they're taking these guys on
[03:54.120 --> 03:58.120]  and we want to do everything we can to help you. We're taking them to task.
[04:00.200 --> 04:09.160]  Quo Warnto. Paul Mitchell, how does he do Quo Warnto? And I apologize. When I mentioned Quo Warnto,
[04:09.160 --> 04:17.640]  I forgot that it's treated differently in different places. So, bring me up to speed on what Mitchell
[04:17.640 --> 04:26.520]  does. Okay, well, we filed a writ of Quo Warnto ex-real as the attorney general for the state of
[04:26.520 --> 04:33.240]  Washington by the people for the people because they didn't. We brought forth all of the evidence
[04:33.240 --> 04:41.160]  of misconduct and malfeasance and they didn't act on it. So, we brought the writ to the appellate court
[04:42.440 --> 04:49.960]  Quo Warnto and they found a loophole to throw it out based on the filing.
[04:51.800 --> 04:58.040]  Does the loophole bar you from refiling? I don't think so.
[04:58.040 --> 05:06.840]  Good. Okay, what does, what does Quo Warnto ask to do? Does it ask to remove
[05:07.800 --> 05:12.280]  the, does it claim the person vacated their office and ask them to be removed?
[05:13.400 --> 05:20.520]  Yes. Okay, good. Then that's got to get their attention and that doesn't have anything to do
[05:20.520 --> 05:21.800]  with your criminal case.
[05:21.800 --> 05:29.080]  Correct. It's a separate matter just like what you brought up with the open bond
[05:29.080 --> 05:37.400]  issue being a separate matter and you brought up interlocutory and yeah.
[05:37.400 --> 05:44.280]  Okay, if you have filed an action, oh, because this is not exactly interlocutory. This sounds
[05:44.280 --> 05:52.840]  like a whole separate action. Did you file it from within this case or did you file a new petition?
[05:54.200 --> 06:00.760]  We filed it within this case. Now, what the clerk tried to say was that only the district
[06:00.760 --> 06:14.440]  attorney in a criminal matter can file a case number. So we filed the Quo Warnto under the
[06:14.440 --> 06:22.520]  appellate court, which we had a different case number under because we were bringing an argument
[06:22.520 --> 06:31.560]  of, you know, this is a matter of an infant minor decedent, which brings it under the appellate
[06:31.560 --> 06:37.880]  court and they didn't want to have anything to do with that because, you know, they're like,
[06:37.880 --> 06:44.520]  no, you're not going to talk about persons. You're not going to talk about what a person
[06:44.520 --> 06:53.160]  is under the 14th Amendment versus a living man. They didn't want to have anything to do with that.
[06:53.160 --> 06:57.000]  Okay, but what does that have to do with Quo Warnto action?
[06:58.040 --> 07:03.560]  Well, it was just the way that we were able to file the action.
[07:03.560 --> 07:09.800]  Oh, okay. In the state of Texas, Quo Warnto must be filed by a prosecuting attorney
[07:09.800 --> 07:18.200]  or by an attorney for the state. Yes. Is it the same in Washington?
[07:19.400 --> 07:24.440]  Yes, and they were saying you can't file that, but, you know, the district attorney,
[07:27.080 --> 07:34.280]  he didn't want to file this even though we have ample evidence that, you know, these guys don't
[07:34.280 --> 07:43.160]  have bonds. They don't have those recorded, which they're, you know, required to have.
[07:44.360 --> 07:48.760]  Then go after the prosecuting attorney for shielding from prosecution.
[07:53.560 --> 07:57.640]  Right. He may have some discussion, but he does not have caprice.
[07:57.640 --> 08:05.480]  This is the argument I made in Pennsylvania because Pennsylvania doesn't have a grand jury,
[08:05.480 --> 08:09.320]  and the prosecuting attorney has first blush discretion.
[08:10.760 --> 08:15.160]  So we filed criminal complaint against the public official, and the prosecuting attorney says,
[08:15.160 --> 08:20.840]  I don't want to hear it. So we filed criminal charges against the prosecuting attorney with
[08:20.840 --> 08:28.760]  the attorney general, claiming that the prosecuting attorney, while he has prosecutorial discretion
[08:29.800 --> 08:35.960]  for the purpose of determining whether there is sufficient evidence to give a reasonable person
[08:35.960 --> 08:40.520]  of ordinary prudence caused to believe that a crime has been committed, he does not have
[08:41.800 --> 08:49.800]  prosecutorial caprice in that he cannot arbitrarily determine which cases he wants to
[08:49.800 --> 08:59.160]  prosecute and which cases he does not. And so the, when the, when the attorney general
[08:59.800 --> 09:06.360]  refused to act on the complaint against the prosecuting attorney, then in accordance with
[09:06.360 --> 09:11.160]  Pennsylvania law, you have standing because you don't have a grand jury, you can appeal
[09:11.160 --> 09:19.960]  his issue to the court of common police. So we have, we appeal the attorney general's refusal to
[09:20.840 --> 09:27.000]  prosecute the prosecuting attorney to the court of common police and then appeal it all the way
[09:27.000 --> 09:32.440]  up to the Supreme. And we just drag him through the mud the whole time.
[09:32.440 --> 09:39.480]  Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Dragging these lawless
[09:40.360 --> 09:45.320]  emepers through the mud because these guys think they can do whatever they want.
[09:46.520 --> 09:51.960]  They think they are God, they think that they are not accountable to the people,
[09:51.960 --> 09:53.320]  and we have to reverse this.
[09:53.320 --> 10:01.160]  Yeah, and the one thing that you find out doing this is the one problem that we tend to have
[10:02.600 --> 10:07.400]  is that once you start doing this, you find that it is way too much fun.
[10:08.840 --> 10:09.240]  All right.
[10:10.040 --> 10:17.400]  It gets addictive. We're so accustomed to these public officials coming after us.
[10:17.400 --> 10:27.000]  Well, when we start going after them, it gets to be great fun. Nathan, have you ever asked a
[10:27.000 --> 10:30.200]  bailiff to arrest the judge in the courtroom?
[10:32.760 --> 10:39.560]  Not yet, but I'm waiting for the day, and I know after listening, this is where I knew
[10:39.560 --> 10:48.120]  we went wrong. We're not necessarily wrong, but we missed an opportunity to really enforce
[10:48.120 --> 10:59.240]  our stand, enforce the rights. Because when these judges admitted in open court on the record
[10:59.240 --> 11:06.280]  that they did not have bonds, they did not need them, was the minute we should have done that.
[11:06.280 --> 11:17.400]  Mr. Bailiff, did you hear that? Oh, that is so much fun. I've done that seven times in court,
[11:18.760 --> 11:23.240]  and every single time the judge sat there and kept his mouth shut.
[11:26.120 --> 11:29.080]  When you do that, you change everything.
[11:29.080 --> 11:37.320]  Right. We did get them to run out of the courtroom when we asked if the state of Washington and
[11:37.320 --> 11:43.160]  the county of Chelan was not a bankrupt debtor in possession under chapter 11 reorganization.
[11:43.720 --> 11:45.800]  That got him out of the courtroom.
[11:48.840 --> 11:49.880]  Okay, explain that.
[11:49.880 --> 11:54.040]  A debtor have standing? Does a debtor have standing? Is the question.
[11:54.040 --> 12:03.080]  Are you in this, are you claiming yourself to be a debtor as the defendant?
[12:04.280 --> 12:13.400]  No, we were saying that the court was a debtor in possession under a chapter 11 reorganization.
[12:17.160 --> 12:19.160]  Okay, how did we get to bankruptcy?
[12:19.160 --> 12:25.240]  We were asking for, we were asking for a claim. Do you have a claim against us?
[12:26.120 --> 12:29.240]  Can a debtor bring a claim against us?
[12:33.480 --> 12:35.800]  I am not sure how we get there.
[12:35.800 --> 12:47.880]  Okay, I am completely lost here. How does the court become a debtor?
[12:50.200 --> 12:54.840]  The court is a corporation.
[12:56.040 --> 12:57.800]  Objection, relevance.
[12:57.800 --> 13:04.360]  And they are operating a business under the...
[13:04.360 --> 13:08.360]  Hold on, hold on. That goes to an unstated presupposition.
[13:09.720 --> 13:15.400]  That the court, when it steps up behind the bench, does so in a corporate capacity.
[13:17.080 --> 13:22.600]  And it does not. The court steps up behind the bench in a constitutional capacity.
[13:22.600 --> 13:29.720]  Now the court may be incorporated, but that's how they can buy toilet paper and pay their help
[13:29.720 --> 13:34.840]  and organize the business of the court. But when that judge steps up on the bench,
[13:35.720 --> 13:42.840]  he's there as a constitutional officer. I've heard this argument a lot and probably the reason he
[13:42.840 --> 13:49.560]  ran out of the court because he hadn't heard this argument before. And he needed to do some
[13:49.560 --> 13:57.560]  research to find out it was actually a frivolous argument. I've been there before and I would
[13:57.560 --> 14:07.960]  very much like to find a way to use this commercial process. A pastime asset, I do a show with him
[14:07.960 --> 14:16.840]  every Thursday morning. And have you ever heard of Winston Shrout? Sure, of course.
[14:16.840 --> 14:25.000]  Okay, he had Winston Shrout had a show on his network. Trying to think of the first guy that
[14:25.000 --> 14:32.920]  really pushed the commercial process. I'll think of it in a minute. He had a show on pastor's network.
[14:32.920 --> 14:39.240]  He's the one that brought these guys into the forefront. And he's had just about all of the
[14:39.240 --> 14:46.920]  major guys in the commercial process on his show. And he told me that in all of his time, with all
[14:46.920 --> 14:54.120]  of these shows we've done, I have never found anyone who achieved remedy using the commercial
[14:54.120 --> 15:06.040]  process. And he was very frustrated about that. I am too. I'm frustrated when someone who is
[15:06.040 --> 15:12.440]  very well intended and Winston Shrout was very well intended. The pastor got me a spot on his show.
[15:13.640 --> 15:21.160]  And I told Winston that I do a show on legal reform and I'm a creature of statute. I have
[15:21.160 --> 15:25.960]  to do everything by law. He explained all of this stuff he's doing. And I said, Winston,
[15:27.480 --> 15:34.280]  where is the statute in case law to support what you're presenting? And he thought about it a
[15:34.280 --> 15:40.680]  minute and he said, well, I don't think there is any. Well, where did you come up with all this?
[15:40.680 --> 15:50.360]  He said, I figured it out. So essentially you're saying you made it up. Long pause and to his
[15:50.360 --> 15:57.880]  credit he said, well, yes, I guess you could say I did. I said, Winston, I can't go into court without
[15:57.880 --> 16:10.840]  made it up. I need facts and I need law. That's all I can use there. Winston's in jail now 160 years.
[16:14.120 --> 16:19.000]  And he was a great guy. I really liked Winston. And he really wanted to help people.
[16:19.000 --> 16:27.000]  But he didn't go into court specifically and strictly facts and law.
[16:28.680 --> 16:32.920]  Number of these guys that were promoting commercial processes are in jail now. And I've
[16:32.920 --> 16:37.400]  been called on in the country to get people out of jail using these processes. So
[16:39.560 --> 16:45.080]  what? That thing beeped. I got 20 seconds. Oh, I'm going to get in trouble. Okay, hang on.
[16:45.080 --> 16:51.560]  I wasn't going to our break if we haven't already. Randy Charlton, Brett Fountain,
[16:52.360 --> 16:57.080]  low radio. We got one empty space. We'll be right back.
[17:00.040 --> 17:04.600]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:05.160 --> 17:10.760]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases
[17:10.760 --> 17:15.560]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step by step
[17:15.560 --> 17:20.600]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[17:20.600 --> 17:25.880]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone
[17:25.880 --> 17:30.520]  calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables
[17:30.520 --> 17:36.760]  on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for
[17:36.760 --> 17:41.960]  how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[17:41.960 --> 17:47.640]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email Michael
[17:47.640 --> 17:57.080]  Mears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[17:57.080 --> 18:03.880]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law
[18:03.880 --> 18:07.880]  traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us against them society. If we, the people,
[18:07.880 --> 18:12.280]  are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.280 --> 18:15.960]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[18:15.960 --> 18:19.960]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[18:19.960 --> 18:23.960]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[18:23.960 --> 18:28.120]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[18:28.120 --> 18:31.800]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand
[18:31.800 --> 18:36.200]  what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this
[18:36.200 --> 18:40.840]  valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[18:40.840 --> 18:44.760]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[18:44.760 --> 18:48.920]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and further
[18:48.920 --> 18:52.440]  useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[18:52.440 --> 18:57.560]  from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want
[18:57.560 --> 19:03.560]  and deserve.
[19:27.560 --> 19:55.560]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Robert
[19:55.560 --> 20:10.040]  Nathan in Washington State. Robert, Nathan, you there? Sorry about that. Okay. Okay, I hope I
[20:10.040 --> 20:17.960]  didn't step on you. It wasn't my intention. But I didn't have concerns about these. Will you explain
[20:17.960 --> 20:31.480]  how you get to the court in the corporate side? Well, we don't get to the court. What we're trying
[20:31.480 --> 20:40.840]  to do is demonstrate that they don't have standing based on the fact that they are a bankrupt entity
[20:41.800 --> 20:45.960]  operating in commerce and they don't have standing to bring a claim because they're
[20:45.960 --> 20:54.040]  there. Okay, hold on, hold on. How do you establish that when the judge steps up behind the bench,
[20:54.040 --> 21:05.880]  he's in commerce? Are they not, is not the court system a bank? No, not that I know of. It's not
[21:05.880 --> 21:13.560]  a bank. The clerk isn't a teller and they're not collecting fees and where did you come up with
[21:13.560 --> 21:21.720]  that? Registry. The clerk is specifically defined in what she is. And they don't say anything about
[21:21.720 --> 21:30.200]  a bank. Well, banks, a bank is a specific legal, a specific type of legal entity.
[21:32.440 --> 21:40.040]  And that is not what a clerk is. Okay, I have a rule that protects us. And it says,
[21:40.040 --> 21:48.920]  never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. When you say the court is a bank,
[21:49.880 --> 21:57.160]  you need to say the court is a bank in accordance with tell me statute or case law.
[21:57.960 --> 22:07.240]  If you don't have that, you have nothing because the judge has only two duties. He must determine
[22:07.240 --> 22:12.920]  the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence, then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts
[22:12.920 --> 22:21.960]  in the case. If you call the court a corporation and you don't give him facts and law as it applies
[22:21.960 --> 22:28.840]  to those facts that make him a corporation, he can't hear you. I mean, he may hear you,
[22:28.840 --> 22:35.720]  but he can't rule on that. I want to set as a judge in a mock trial. And this guy, Danny,
[22:35.720 --> 22:40.760]  he stayed in Pennsylvania, was coming after him. We were in Massachusetts at the time.
[22:40.760 --> 22:46.120]  Pastor Massad was the prosecutor. He was tough. But I'm sitting up there as the mock judge,
[22:46.840 --> 22:53.800]  and Danny's up there talking a lot of patriot issues. And I'm thinking, okay, okay, and I'm
[22:53.800 --> 22:59.880]  on their side. I'm one of you guys. Give me facts and law. Give me something I can rule on. And
[22:59.880 --> 23:04.920]  he's going on and on about all this patriot stuff. That's really nice. But give me some facts and
[23:04.920 --> 23:14.440]  law. It was frustrating. I kind of understood that a judge is frustration. They sit here and listen
[23:14.440 --> 23:21.480]  to this stuff, and they know the guy is digging him a hole. But I couldn't tell him. I'm trying to
[23:21.480 --> 23:25.960]  act like a real judge. So I call a recess and he had a guy helping him. And I told him, Danny,
[23:27.000 --> 23:31.640]  this guy's trying to help you. But if he gets up there and says anything else,
[23:31.640 --> 23:41.560]  you have my permission to shoot him. He's going to get you put in jail. We had a mock court with
[23:41.560 --> 23:47.640]  a mock jury. They pulled off the street. Just ordinary people who agreed to sit in on it.
[23:47.640 --> 23:53.880]  They found him guilty. Three months later, they had another mock trial that I didn't participate in.
[23:53.880 --> 23:59.320]  They found him guilty again. He went to trial in Pennsylvania. I got two years in prison.
[23:59.320 --> 24:07.640]  Facts and Law. That's all the judge can hear. So what facts and law do you have before this judge
[24:07.640 --> 24:13.640]  to show that he doesn't have standing? He doesn't have a bond or an office.
[24:14.520 --> 24:19.160]  That one's good. You got facts and law on that one.
[24:21.080 --> 24:27.800]  Yeah. And not only that, but also the legislature for the county doesn't have bonds either.
[24:27.800 --> 24:34.120]  Nor does the sheriff have bonds. I mean, all of these guys, they're not following the law.
[24:35.320 --> 24:39.160]  Have you filed criminally against them? That's why I said they're dipped in caca.
[24:41.720 --> 24:49.560]  What? You said they were what? Dipped in caca. Oh, dipped in caca. I forgot. That was a term of art.
[24:49.560 --> 24:58.120]  Yes, they are. And you need to come in with a shovel in the form of criminal accusations against
[24:58.120 --> 25:05.240]  them and then get all the public officials who have a duty to prosecute crime to refuse to prosecute
[25:05.240 --> 25:15.240]  that crime, which we did. We went to the sheriff and he recused himself. So then we went to the
[25:15.240 --> 25:21.640]  police. No, no, no. Hold on. Hold on. Sheriff cannot recuse himself. Well, he basically said,
[25:21.640 --> 25:26.120]  look, I don't, you know, I'm not dealing with this because this isn't my jurisdiction. This is
[25:26.120 --> 25:32.280]  the jurisdiction of the municipal police department. And we... No, no, no, no. He's full of crap. Oh,
[25:33.240 --> 25:36.920]  no. Okay, that's good. That's good. Now you charge him with Miss Peejenson office.
[25:38.040 --> 25:45.080]  Yes. You have that statute. Everybody has that statute. So have you charged him
[25:45.080 --> 25:51.560]  criminally? No, we have not done that. And that's why I'm talking to you now.
[25:52.360 --> 25:59.480]  Okay. Okay. Let me tell you one of my favorite stories. I'm helping people stop foreclosures
[25:59.480 --> 26:05.480]  or stop evictions in this case. In Texas, anyone can represent someone in an eviction hearing.
[26:05.480 --> 26:14.680]  Okay. So a friend of mine, David went up first and this judge Hayes was a real stinker and real
[26:14.680 --> 26:20.760]  me spirit a guy. And David goes up and I walked up to the bar and just stood there. And finally,
[26:20.760 --> 26:24.840]  the judge looked up and said, can I help you? I said, yes, your honor, my name's Randy Kelton
[26:24.840 --> 26:28.920]  and I have a hearing deficiency. Well, Mr. Kelton, what's wrong with your hearing? So,
[26:28.920 --> 26:34.600]  I'll judge you. I was down in Mexico the other day and I drank too much of that cheap tequila
[26:34.600 --> 26:39.880]  and I lost my hearing aid. Well, I was lying. I had it in my pocket. Well, why are you telling me
[26:39.880 --> 26:44.520]  this? Do you have a competition for the hearing impaired? No, I do not. I see you have a sound
[26:44.520 --> 26:51.400]  system here. Will you turn it up? No, I will not. Well, then will you speak up? And he did. He told
[26:51.400 --> 26:57.160]  the bailiff, that didn't sound shut up. He's a strobeialic courtroom. Well, I went up for my
[26:57.160 --> 27:03.320]  he ruled against David. I went up for mine and he denied my challenge subject matter jurisdiction,
[27:03.320 --> 27:09.880]  which I just filed 20 minutes ago and that really annoyed him. And so, I stormed out of the courtroom
[27:09.880 --> 27:15.160]  and stopped at the bar and pointed at the bailiff, you come with me and I stormed out of the courtroom.
[27:15.880 --> 27:20.520]  The bailiff came out and said, what can I do for you, Mr. Kelton? I need you to arrest the judge.
[27:21.800 --> 27:27.560]  Well, why would I arrest the judge? Class A, misdemeanor, official oppression, criminal violation
[27:27.560 --> 27:34.760]  39.03, Texas Penal Code, in that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform
[27:34.760 --> 27:40.760]  and in the process, denied me full free access to enjoy my right. Well, what right did he deny
[27:40.760 --> 27:45.960]  you in? He denied me and my right to accommodation under the Americans Disabilities Act. Well,
[27:45.960 --> 27:51.720]  Mr. Kelton, why didn't you tell him about the Americans Disabilities Act? Well, heck, if I'd
[27:51.720 --> 27:57.880]  done that, he might have turned the sound up. Why are you getting there and arresting me? This big
[27:57.880 --> 28:03.880]  guy, about six foot six, three fifty four hundred pounds. Well, I can't arrest the judge. You sure
[28:03.880 --> 28:08.920]  can. Just go in there and throw the cuffs on him and drag him off to jail. Oh, no, Mr. Kelton,
[28:08.920 --> 28:14.920]  I can't arrest the judge. I said, look at you, big strapped in officer. Got that pistol on your hip.
[28:14.920 --> 28:19.480]  You need to take your chicken suit off. He said, I'm not taking my chicken suit off.
[28:19.480 --> 28:27.480]  Point is, all of these guys, every time you step up in front of a public official,
[28:28.360 --> 28:34.600]  never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do.
[28:36.600 --> 28:43.800]  Because you never ask them to do anything that the law does not compel them to do
[28:43.800 --> 28:49.720]  so that when they don't do it, you can bring out the Ku Klux Klan Act. Official oppression is the
[28:49.720 --> 28:57.640]  state representation of 18 U.S. Code 242 every state has it. If a public official fails to perform
[28:57.640 --> 29:04.920]  a duty he is required to perform, or exerts or purports to exert an authority he does not expressly
[29:04.920 --> 29:10.360]  have, and in the process, denies you informed for access to or enjoy him at a variety of
[29:10.360 --> 29:17.640]  classic misdemeanor in every state of looked at. Up to you in jail. Let's dance, Bubba.
[29:19.800 --> 29:24.200]  I asked, is he some workers? They tell me I can't see him. Oh, you shouldn't have told me that.
[29:24.760 --> 29:32.920]  I take out my phone. I dial 911. Get somebody out here to arrest him. Never give fair warning.
[29:35.000 --> 29:39.160]  Never tell him, oh, I got this fraud. I got that right. You're supposed to do this and that.
[29:39.160 --> 29:46.200]  They'll always take that as you being agitated. Just call 911. That's a lot more fun. Hang on,
[29:46.200 --> 29:50.600]  Randy Kelton, Brett Felton. The Wheel of the Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:00.760 --> 30:05.640]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.640 --> 30:10.360]  could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell
[30:10.360 --> 30:16.760]  you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give
[30:16.760 --> 30:22.040]  up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find
[30:22.040 --> 30:28.040]  your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your
[30:28.040 --> 30:33.800]  information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is
[30:33.800 --> 30:39.960]  brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:39.960 --> 30:46.920]  Start over with StartPage. New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're
[30:46.920 --> 30:52.120]  going to live. The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk
[30:52.120 --> 30:57.320]  one meter per second or faster live longer than expected. In case you're wondering, one meter
[30:57.320 --> 31:02.680]  per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour. A senior's age, gender, and walking speed
[31:02.680 --> 31:07.640]  were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures. Generally
[31:07.640 --> 31:13.240]  speaking, faster walkers live longer. Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. It only
[31:13.240 --> 31:18.200]  takes a stopwatch, some space to walk in a few minutes. Researchers say it could help doctors
[31:18.200 --> 31:24.120]  identify older patients who need special care. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[31:24.120 --> 31:34.840]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com. I lost my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2004,
[31:34.840 --> 31:40.840]  most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story
[31:40.840 --> 31:45.800]  skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. I will be official explanation is that fire brought down
[31:45.800 --> 31:51.080]  building 7. Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there
[31:51.080 --> 31:57.640]  is more to the story. Bring justice to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org.
[31:57.640 --> 32:03.960]  Why it fell. Why it matters. And what you can do. Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our
[32:03.960 --> 32:09.400]  lineup for the new year. Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th,
[32:09.400 --> 32:16.280]  from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516. Let your light so shine
[32:16.280 --> 32:22.200]  before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to
[32:22.200 --> 32:28.280]  reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Join Nana and guests for both
[32:28.280 --> 32:33.960]  verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good
[32:33.960 --> 32:39.880]  works. Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one
[32:39.880 --> 32:45.960]  chapter per week. Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine
[32:45.960 --> 32:51.000]  as well as Christian character development. So mark your calendar and join us live on
[32:51.000 --> 32:57.880]  LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring
[32:57.880 --> 33:17.640]  and motivating discussion of the Scriptures. Live Free Speech Radio LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:27.880 --> 33:49.640]  I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes
[33:49.640 --> 34:11.400]  cause it wants me to use your nose also coming light. It seems you like the space but please take some words to the wise. Please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
[34:19.960 --> 34:31.320]  Okay we are back. We're at the fountain. We're at the low radio and we're talking to
[34:32.360 --> 34:38.280]  Robert and Nathaniel in Washington state. Okay what I was talking about when I went out
[34:38.840 --> 34:48.680]  is the process of the routine. We run the routine on them. It takes a little longer. I tried to go
[34:48.680 --> 34:54.520]  through that very quickly. I'm putting together a seminar on this and we're going to do the first one in North Carolina.
[34:55.240 --> 35:02.680]  But I spent two days. I've got enough for a week but we're going to do a two day seminar
[35:03.400 --> 35:10.920]  and this is part of it. This will take half a day and we walk through the routine where
[35:11.800 --> 35:15.320]  you never ask public officials to do anything you actually want them to do
[35:15.320 --> 35:23.960]  and how to walk them through a process. All of these rules I have developed those over the years
[35:25.080 --> 35:33.240]  based on what these officials do. Doing it this way will keep you at two steps ahead of
[35:33.240 --> 35:40.920]  them all the time. And basically the routine is let's say you've got a judge here without
[35:40.920 --> 35:51.160]  a oath of office even if he's got one now. He sat as a judge and ruled on cases when he had not met
[35:51.160 --> 35:58.120]  the statutory requirements for the office so he vacated the office. He acted without subject matter
[35:58.120 --> 36:07.880]  jurisdiction and impersonated a public official. So you'll find that I like to walk them up from
[36:07.880 --> 36:16.120]  the bottom to the top. Every judge you try to give this to will refuse to do his duty.
[36:17.320 --> 36:21.160]  Are you familiar with the criminal complaint I filed against the governor in Texas?
[36:23.160 --> 36:31.320]  You know I'd like that. I read that today. Okay I filed that. Okay I didn't care about
[36:31.320 --> 36:40.600]  the governor. I used the governor to crash dummy. Everything you do you should have a goal.
[36:42.520 --> 36:49.480]  What are you trying to achieve and you need to put that out in front of you as your guide because
[36:49.480 --> 36:56.440]  they will try to lead you down one rabbit hole after another. You set your goal. My goal is
[36:56.440 --> 37:02.760]  to put every judge in the country in a position such that when they step right behind the bench
[37:02.760 --> 37:08.040]  look out across the bar at the gallery I want them wondering which one. Which one of those
[37:08.040 --> 37:12.120]  scoundrels sitting out there are waiting for me to render a ruling they don't like so they can run
[37:12.120 --> 37:18.440]  down the grandeur and try to get me indicted. Thomas Jefferson said when the people fear the
[37:18.440 --> 37:25.400]  government there is tyranny. When the government fears the people there is liberty. So that's my
[37:25.400 --> 37:36.360]  ultimate overriding purpose and in each step down from that I have a goal and all those goals
[37:36.360 --> 37:43.080]  will ultimately lead me toward that purpose. So I'm always after the judges and in this case
[37:43.080 --> 37:50.120]  I filed against the governor on the 8th of October. On the 9th of October I took that
[37:50.120 --> 37:57.320]  same criminal complaint that I gave to the district attorney for the grand jury and mailed it to the
[37:57.320 --> 38:05.720]  chief justice of the Texas Supreme. And I stated that since I am filing criminal complaints against
[38:05.720 --> 38:12.840]  the highest level executive officer in the state of Texas it is appropriate that I file it with
[38:12.840 --> 38:21.000]  the highest level judicial officer in the state of Texas. Which is Judge Hitch chief justice
[38:21.000 --> 38:27.400]  Texas Supreme Court. In Texas we have two high courts one for civil one for criminal supreme
[38:27.400 --> 38:35.080]  does civil. Well he refused the whole examining trial and under 2.09 Texas penal code a Texas
[38:35.080 --> 38:44.440]  criminal code of criminal procedure who are magistrates. First one justices of the supreme
[38:44.440 --> 38:50.200]  court. Well he refused the whole examining trial. So I filed criminal charges against him
[38:51.240 --> 38:59.320]  with the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals. And accused the chief justice
[38:59.320 --> 39:06.840]  of denying the governor due process by refusing to hold an examining trial which would have given
[39:06.840 --> 39:13.800]  the governor opportunity to enter exculpatory evidence so that the grand jury would have that
[39:13.800 --> 39:19.880]  to consider when they got my complaints. As it was exactly what you were saying about what was
[39:19.880 --> 39:28.040]  going on with Robert exactly same thing exactly he was denied due process. This requirement was
[39:28.040 --> 39:35.400]  first put in law in 1216 A.D. when the Dukes drug King John down to the River Thames at Reignade
[39:35.400 --> 39:42.280]  and threatened to cut his head off if he didn't follow his agreement and signed the first Magna
[39:42.280 --> 39:51.000]  Carter Libertatum. It's been in law ever since and served us well. Well the presiding judge of
[39:51.000 --> 39:56.680]  court of criminal appeals should have got it because in 2008 I put her and all the judges
[39:56.680 --> 40:02.760]  of the nine judges at the court of criminal appeals in front of a grand jury. Grand jury got my
[40:02.760 --> 40:09.240]  complaints on their first day in office they no build on their last day. In that interim these
[40:09.240 --> 40:16.600]  judges had to wonder if their career was going on tomorrow and all they had was my 119 page
[40:16.600 --> 40:23.560]  criminal complaint. That was before the grand jury. Grand jury had nothing else because
[40:23.560 --> 40:30.440]  there was no examining trial held on the justice as well. It was a minor problem with that. They
[40:30.440 --> 40:37.000]  would have had to be arrested first. That would have been inconvenient but she should have understood
[40:37.000 --> 40:44.920]  the problem. So then I went down to the district judge and I was trying to file with the district
[40:44.920 --> 40:53.960]  judge against these two judges when they arrested me. That was an oops. Now I've got over a hundred
[40:53.960 --> 41:00.360]  million dollar lawsuit against him for that. This is how the process works. He just walk comes
[41:00.360 --> 41:09.400]  from it. Generally you would start at the bottom and walk you. That whole idea of like going before
[41:09.400 --> 41:16.760]  the court and saying hey I don't have my hearing aid because if we're just
[41:19.000 --> 41:28.040]  in plain English and we don't understand legalese isn't that an ADA issue? I mean it doesn't
[41:28.040 --> 41:35.160]  matter. Yes Americans with Disabilities Act language. Aren't I at a disadvantage?
[41:35.160 --> 41:46.680]  Who me? Oh no. No no anyone. Anyone going before a court and they're talking a language you don't
[41:46.680 --> 41:55.480]  understand. How can you have do process a remedy if you don't understand what they're speaking?
[41:56.040 --> 41:59.320]  They're denying me and my right to a public court.
[41:59.320 --> 42:09.240]  So you set them up. Point is always know what you're going to do next. I set that judge up.
[42:10.040 --> 42:15.640]  If you go to any courthouse in Dallas or Fort Worth area and mention my name
[42:17.800 --> 42:23.640]  you can hear their anal sphincter muscles squeezing shut because the word is if that
[42:23.640 --> 42:30.520]  countness OB comes to your office watch out. He is just trying to do something so he can get
[42:30.520 --> 42:36.760]  you to do something so he can file criminal charges against you and that's right. I am
[42:37.800 --> 42:43.800]  so don't screw with me. Right. If you have it if you have an attitude you better leave that at
[42:43.800 --> 42:52.760]  house because I will adjust it for you if we can get one person in every county. You know in this
[42:52.760 --> 43:00.360]  case with Robert I mean Robert will walk in and they'll definitely like contract their sphincter
[43:01.000 --> 43:08.680]  but like we're missing that aspect of it and that was the puzzle piece that I found through your work
[43:09.400 --> 43:20.680]  was not stopping and allowing an unjust ruling to go unnoticed like we're not going to take that
[43:20.680 --> 43:27.960]  as an answer. Exactly. That's the whole point. You want them to rule against you.
[43:29.320 --> 43:36.760]  You want them to misapply the law to the facts. We have a case in Texas Walker v. Packard.
[43:38.760 --> 43:44.840]  Come on Brett. Did I get it right? You got it. He generally tells me I got it wrong even if I got
[43:44.840 --> 43:50.760]  it right. We'll talk about Walker v. Packard when we come back. You are going to like this. We'll
[43:50.760 --> 43:55.960]  find something in Washington law that's similar. Hang on Randy Kelton Brett Fountain. We'll be right
[43:55.960 --> 44:06.360]  back. Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.360 --> 44:11.160]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.160 --> 44:17.480]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.480 --> 44:22.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.200 --> 44:28.440]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos radio network gets many requests to endorse
[44:28.440 --> 44:34.280]  all sorts of products most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[44:34.280 --> 44:39.880]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.880 --> 44:46.120]  When you order from Logos Radio Network.com your health will improve as you help support
[44:46.120 --> 44:51.800]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.800 --> 44:56.920]  As a distributor you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[44:56.920 --> 45:03.480]  and increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.480 --> 45:09.560]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand,
[45:09.560 --> 45:16.840]  four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[45:16.840 --> 45:21.560]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do
[45:21.560 --> 45:28.760]  for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary
[45:28.760 --> 45:35.240]  was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not
[45:35.240 --> 45:40.920]  in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[45:40.920 --> 45:46.600]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[45:46.600 --> 45:55.000]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit LulaVlogRadio.com
[45:55.000 --> 46:00.600]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:25.000 --> 46:32.760]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rudevlog Radio, and we're talking to Robert
[46:32.760 --> 46:41.400]  Nathan in Washington State. You happen to hit on my favorite topic. I have way too much fun with
[46:41.400 --> 46:48.520]  this. I love doing it. That's the problem you can have as it gets addictive. But point is,
[46:48.520 --> 46:52.280]  never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do because everything's
[46:52.280 --> 47:01.000]  a setup. If they do what you want them to, they screwed up everything. And we're speaking to
[47:02.440 --> 47:12.680]  Walker V. Packer when we went out. Walker V. Packer says that a judge has no discretion
[47:12.680 --> 47:21.000]  in properly applying the law to the facts. A failure to do so is an abuse of discretion.
[47:22.600 --> 47:31.960]  Well, the way I read the penal code state of Texas, if a public official abuses his discretion
[47:31.960 --> 47:37.720]  and in the process denies a citizen in the full and free access to her enjoyment, we're right.
[47:37.720 --> 47:48.920]  That's a class A misdemeanor in Texas. So while I have the right to petition the
[47:48.920 --> 47:58.280]  Court of Appeals for a ruling to overturn their ruling, they committed a crime. That's a separate
[47:58.280 --> 48:09.560]  issue. We asked the district court for findings of facts and conclusions at law. And under the
[48:09.560 --> 48:18.600]  rule, they had 20 days to produce it. On the 21st day, if you haven't received it, you can
[48:19.800 --> 48:26.520]  file a notice of late filing. And we did that. But we also filed criminal charges against him
[48:26.520 --> 48:33.960]  with the grand jury. I bet he didn't see that coming. The judges forget about that side and we
[48:33.960 --> 48:43.800]  need to remind them. So I'm asking you to change your mindset. Because we did that. We did a finding
[48:43.800 --> 48:50.360]  a fact and conclusion of law. And what does the rule say? Does the rule say that the judge
[48:50.360 --> 48:56.680]  should, can, may matter, can if he wants to, or does it say shall?
[49:00.840 --> 49:05.000]  As far as the statute goes? Yeah. This will probably be in the rules.
[49:05.960 --> 49:13.880]  Move the civil procedure. Right. Well, they did produce the finding a fact and a conclusion
[49:13.880 --> 49:21.640]  of law. But it was an error, basically. They were basically defending their position that they
[49:21.640 --> 49:27.480]  don't need a bond. Good. Okay. That's good. That's exactly what it should have been. And
[49:29.160 --> 49:37.080]  in Texas, and it's probably similar in other states, technically, if you don't request findings of
[49:37.080 --> 49:45.480]  fact and conclusions at law, then you haven't perfected your appeal because you don't know what
[49:45.480 --> 49:51.960]  facts the judge relied on and what law the judge applied to those facts.
[49:54.120 --> 49:59.960]  So it denies you an appeal. It denies you your right to appeal. And that should get criminal
[49:59.960 --> 50:05.400]  charges. But if they file findings of facts and conclusions at law, that's one claim you don't
[50:05.400 --> 50:15.000]  get. But that is amazing that a municipal court actually provided it. You know what that tells me?
[50:17.480 --> 50:21.880]  There are some really tight anal sphincters going on around there.
[50:23.480 --> 50:30.680]  Absolutely. Yeah, these guys are taking this really serious. Have you filed criminally against
[50:30.680 --> 50:43.480]  him yet? Well, what we pursued was not what you outlined. We went to the municipal police that
[50:43.480 --> 50:50.360]  had the jurisdiction over the courthouse and asked the captain to arrest the judge.
[50:51.480 --> 50:57.480]  And he hemhauled around about it. He agreed with us. He said, that guy's a son of a bitch.
[50:57.480 --> 51:03.800]  Oh, we can say son of a bitch on the air. We can say, oh yeah, we can say that. Can't we?
[51:05.400 --> 51:07.800]  Well, it's a dog, right? Yes, a dog. Okay.
[51:10.840 --> 51:19.480]  Now, there are things you can't say on there like anal sphincter in the cloveal. Okay, enough
[51:19.480 --> 51:29.240]  of that crappy humor. Okay, what did the municipal officer do? The same thing you've been doing,
[51:29.240 --> 51:34.680]  but we just haven't perfected it. Okay, when you're a municipal officer, this is what I do.
[51:34.680 --> 51:40.840]  I go to a magistrate and the magistrate says, oh, you shouldn't file that with me. You should
[51:40.840 --> 51:47.000]  file that with the sheriff's department. Oh, thank you very much. I appreciate your advice there.
[51:47.000 --> 51:51.480]  And I will go do that. So I go to the sheriff's department and I file criminal charges against
[51:51.480 --> 52:01.160]  the magistrate. The one that just sent over there could not perform his duty as a magistrate.
[52:01.720 --> 52:07.800]  And so what are you going to tell me, sheriff? And the way you do that when you go to a policing
[52:07.800 --> 52:17.560]  agency, they're going to always want to give you a voluntary statement form. And what you do is you
[52:17.560 --> 52:24.040]  make up your criminal affidavit and have it verified and bring it with you. We need you to fill out
[52:24.040 --> 52:32.680]  this. Oh, okay. In Graham, Texas. I take it, I fill it out, I give it back to him and he's
[52:32.680 --> 52:40.760]  reading it and he realizes there's something behind it. He pulls it out. What's this? Wow,
[52:40.760 --> 52:46.840]  that's a verified criminal affidavit against county attorney. Oh, I'm not taking this. Sorry,
[52:46.840 --> 52:53.800]  Bubba. You got it. You're stuck to it. I'm not going to do anything with it. I don't care what you do.
[52:53.800 --> 53:03.720]  That's how you do it. And you just walk them up the line, always have a verified criminal
[53:03.720 --> 53:13.560]  affidavit with you. And you give that to them. The reason I was arrested is the district judge
[53:13.560 --> 53:20.200]  knew I was coming to give him a verified criminal affidavit against the county judge
[53:20.200 --> 53:26.440]  and he did not want to be on that dime. And he knew exactly what was going to happen with that
[53:26.440 --> 53:33.240]  routine. Yeah, he knew exactly. I had already filed criminal charges against him a couple of times
[53:33.240 --> 53:41.560]  as a grand jury. Actually, I just filed the more chicken caca, the most chicken caca criminal
[53:41.560 --> 53:47.960]  complaint with the grand jury I ever filed. I asked to see the attorney wheel for all the
[53:47.960 --> 53:52.680]  court upon attorneys. He refused to let me see it unless I gave him a written request. I gave it
[53:52.680 --> 54:00.120]  to him. He got the county attorney to request an opinion from the attorney general. I charged
[54:01.160 --> 54:07.320]  the county attorney and the district judge with criminal conspiracy and official misconduct
[54:08.920 --> 54:15.080]  for misappropriating public funds because the county attorney is paid by the county and the
[54:15.080 --> 54:21.960]  district judge is paid by the state. He should have went to the district attorney. But the district
[54:21.960 --> 54:30.920]  attorney would have told him give him the records. So I filed with the grand jury. Oh, that was so
[54:30.920 --> 54:38.920]  much fun. A brand new district attorney was the judge died. They moved the district attorney to
[54:38.920 --> 54:44.600]  the judge's position and their county attorney to the district attorney's position. So I gave him
[54:44.600 --> 54:53.720]  criminal complaints against himself. Oh, that was so much fun. But I sealed it in an envelope
[54:53.720 --> 55:01.800]  addressed to the former to the grand jury and used a wax seal. And inside I put a cover letter
[55:01.800 --> 55:06.680]  asking him to send this cover letter back to me. So I know he actually got it and asked him to
[55:06.680 --> 55:11.800]  initial it. And if the seal was broken when you got it, check this box on the bottom.
[55:11.800 --> 55:19.880]  Well, I never got that letter back. So I have reason to believe it from and didn't get those
[55:19.880 --> 55:31.720]  complaints. Okay, there's a lot to this. We don't have time on this show. I've got stuff I've used
[55:31.720 --> 55:41.560]  up a lot of time. But just it's not that difficult. If you think every guy you go to, you're going to
[55:41.560 --> 55:49.320]  ask him to do something and you don't want him to do it. And never give fair warning. Don't tell
[55:49.320 --> 55:57.240]  him what he's supposed to do. Here, I need you to act on these complaints. And let him do whatever
[55:57.240 --> 56:04.120]  he wants to. And then the next thing you know, you're filing against him. Arlene Contextious,
[56:04.120 --> 56:09.320]  I asked to see some records. She said, are you the accused? Oh, no, no, no, I'm a good guy.
[56:09.320 --> 56:15.240]  Are you the attorney? Oh, no, no, I keep both hands and I keep my hands in my pockets. And
[56:17.000 --> 56:18.120]  what's the rest of that bread?
[56:19.640 --> 56:21.240]  Keep my hands in my own pockets.
[56:22.600 --> 56:25.560]  And there was two of them. I lost them. Sleep well at night.
[56:25.560 --> 56:30.040]  Sleep well at night. Keep my hands in my own pockets. So she said, well, if you're not the
[56:30.040 --> 56:36.680]  attorney of the accused, you can't see those. Now, I could have told her what the law said. I could
[56:36.680 --> 56:44.440]  have quoted or the Open Records Act or the Constitution required a public court. But instead,
[56:44.440 --> 56:49.800]  I said, oh, you shouldn't have told me that. And I called the bailiff over and asked him to arrest her
[56:50.920 --> 56:53.480]  for not showing them to me. And he said, well, you can't see those.
[56:54.520 --> 57:00.360]  You shouldn't have told me that either. Take out my cell phone. You can't use a
[57:00.360 --> 57:05.000]  cell phone in here. I looked up and said, are you going to interfere with a 911 call?
[57:05.000 --> 57:10.760]  Oops. I thought 911 asked for somebody to come out and arrest both of them.
[57:12.120 --> 57:19.640]  When you do that, you completely change the position you're in. You're now the victim.
[57:20.920 --> 57:28.520]  Now, you get an officer sent out based on your 911 call. And you get to see this little chicken
[57:28.520 --> 57:35.240]  dance. The little chicken dance is where they start shifting from one foot to the other. Oh,
[57:35.240 --> 57:41.880]  uh, Mr. Calcum, uh, I can't arrest him. Oh, sure you can. Just just throw the cuffs on him and
[57:41.880 --> 57:45.400]  drag him off to jail. Heck, you don't have far to go. You got one right down the basement.
[57:46.120 --> 57:49.080]  Oh, no, no, no, miss Cal, I can't arrest a bailiff.
[57:50.040 --> 57:57.320]  And always tell him, you need to take your chicken suit off. The reason I do that is I'm
[57:57.320 --> 58:07.400]  always thinking what will play well before a grand jury of my peers. They can't accuse me of being
[58:07.400 --> 58:14.760]  angry, agitated, troubling, you know, disruptive when I ask him to take his chicken suit off.
[58:17.960 --> 58:18.760]  Okay.
[58:18.760 --> 58:23.800]  That's where we've been. We've been this last year and this is that we've been beating them over the
[58:23.800 --> 58:31.640]  head with a frontal assault of the law and not setting traps like we did. Okay. That's, you're
[58:31.640 --> 58:37.400]  missing the best part. Hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side. Randy Calcum, Brett Thouten,
[58:37.400 --> 58:44.600]  Bruella Radio. Tina, we're going to get to you. Okay. You're still there. Okay. Uh, we'll be right back.
[58:44.600 --> 58:54.040]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.040 --> 58:59.640]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.640 --> 59:04.440]  can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:04.440 --> 59:09.960]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.960 --> 59:15.560]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three volume set
[59:15.560 --> 59:20.600]  called basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the
[59:20.600 --> 59:26.680]  Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build
[59:26.680 --> 59:32.520]  up the church to order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the
[59:32.520 --> 59:45.880]  Christian life. Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us
[59:45.880 --> 59:58.280]  online at bfa.org. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:58.280 --> 01:00:04.360]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.200 --> 01:00:12.920]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:12.920 --> 01:00:20.680]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.680 --> 01:00:29.000]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:41.320]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:41.320 --> 01:00:52.280]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.280 --> 01:00:58.120]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and
[01:00:58.120 --> 01:01:07.320]  entering 40. Today in history and recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:13.000]  1325 legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June county prosecutors around the state including
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.640]  Houston, Austin, San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing
[01:01:17.640 --> 01:01:22.600]  to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:01:22.600 --> 01:01:27.960]  to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this
[01:01:27.960 --> 01:01:32.840]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:32.840 --> 01:01:36.920]  law. Mr Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:01:36.920 --> 01:01:41.960]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:41.960 --> 01:01:48.200]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well
[01:01:48.200 --> 01:01:54.760]  as other cities too like the district attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza a Democrat who also
[01:01:54.760 --> 01:01:59.560]  stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of
[01:01:59.560 --> 01:02:04.920]  marijuana cases in El Paso. However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr Brandon Ball
[01:02:04.920 --> 01:02:10.120]  an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing
[01:02:10.120 --> 01:02:14.600]  on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone is
[01:02:14.600 --> 01:02:23.960]  charged with something the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University
[01:02:23.960 --> 01:02:29.080]  identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of
[01:02:29.080 --> 01:02:35.160]  Mexico the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other
[01:02:35.160 --> 01:02:40.680]  one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean according to the university paper the
[01:02:40.680 --> 01:02:47.320]  sharks it creates a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized
[01:02:47.320 --> 01:03:00.600]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is Rook Rody with your lowdown for July 22nd 2019.
[01:03:17.320 --> 01:03:32.600]  Okay we are back Randy Kelton Brett Fountain rule low radio and we're talking to Robert Mason
[01:03:32.600 --> 01:03:37.960]  in Washington state okay it sounds like you're already on track Mason.
[01:03:37.960 --> 01:03:47.800]  Yeah absolutely and what we're looking for here is to bring this to the public's attention we need
[01:03:47.800 --> 01:04:00.200]  a show we need this to be brought for to a public record so that we can have a win for us we the
[01:04:00.200 --> 01:04:09.320]  people we the people need a win in this situation and I appreciate everything you're doing to help
[01:04:09.320 --> 01:04:16.520]  us we've been in this battle for a couple of years and we've been dealing with these guys
[01:04:17.080 --> 01:04:24.200]  and you're dealing with these guys and I feel like we're soldiers in arms shoulder to shoulder
[01:04:24.200 --> 01:04:34.600]  we're on the same page and we're going to make it happen. Good and we'll be here with any help we
[01:04:34.600 --> 01:04:44.360]  can give you. I appreciate that you guys are awesome righteous let's let's go forth and true
[01:04:44.360 --> 01:04:51.400]  you know what I mean let's let's be uh accountable let's be accountable and and let's hold those
[01:04:51.400 --> 01:04:59.160]  people accountable that that's the idea we're all accountable to our actions they act out we got to
[01:04:59.160 --> 01:05:04.760]  hold them accountable in this story the reason why everything sideways because we haven't been
[01:05:04.760 --> 01:05:12.120]  holding these guys accountable that's been my story it's not the police it's not the prosecutors
[01:05:12.120 --> 01:05:21.480]  your judges it's us we haven't done our job probably the main reason we haven't done our job is we
[01:05:21.480 --> 01:05:34.600]  just don't realize how much fun it can be okay do you have anything else for us I'll let you go and
[01:05:34.600 --> 01:05:40.120]  you can talk to anybody else you want but I appreciate the time and uh god bless we're
[01:05:40.120 --> 01:05:49.640]  going to do this okay okay thank you Nathan okay now we're going to go to Tina in California
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:56.360]  if I get my screen up there we go hello Tina what do you have for us today
[01:05:57.640 --> 01:06:07.240]  well I've got a few things actually uh I found something today that I thought be very interesting
[01:06:07.240 --> 01:06:20.200]  particularly for those in California and it's about the right of an indigent party to have
[01:06:20.200 --> 01:06:32.120]  counsel and it's you know I sent you something about it and it says um where is it uh prior
[01:06:32.120 --> 01:06:38.600]  California rulings any protection suggest an error in the denial of right to counsel
[01:06:39.160 --> 01:06:47.880]  for indigent civil litigants so they're basically saying that you know you were talking about the
[01:06:47.880 --> 01:06:57.320]  Magna Carta earlier and this is all goes back to indigestion law which is really fascinating
[01:06:57.320 --> 01:07:05.480]  that it seems to basically say that under the common law in the United States and California
[01:07:05.480 --> 01:07:14.440]  Constitutions um that indigent civil litigants not just criminal uh they will have the right
[01:07:15.080 --> 01:07:23.480]  to counsel so if you are deemed as informal paupers you still have an incoherent
[01:07:23.480 --> 01:07:32.040]  right in now am I pronouncing this right uh incoherent right to free counsel in incoherent
[01:07:32.760 --> 01:07:40.360]  incoherent for right for free counsel for indigent civil litigants exists under California
[01:07:40.360 --> 01:07:48.120]  common law we have possessed this right in several cases under the common law since 1850
[01:07:48.120 --> 01:07:56.680]  shortly after the state's constitution was adopted um and you know I was looking at that
[01:07:57.320 --> 01:08:08.760]  and it talks about the um right uh of where did I send you this the right to have uh
[01:08:09.640 --> 01:08:16.760]  you know when you're talking about um because under California due process interpretations
[01:08:16.760 --> 01:08:28.120]  a civil litigant cannot be deprived of property without a due process hearing with representation
[01:08:28.120 --> 01:08:38.600]  by counsel now I was deprived of property without the process of a hearing without
[01:08:38.600 --> 01:08:46.040]  representation by counsel because we have a non-judicial statute here doesn't that go
[01:08:46.040 --> 01:08:51.960]  completely against what this says that under California due process interpretations
[01:08:52.520 --> 01:08:58.520]  we can be deprived of property no I'm afraid it doesn't it goes to contract
[01:09:00.840 --> 01:09:10.680]  that was an agreement made in the contract as a condition of initiating the loan
[01:09:10.680 --> 01:09:21.480]  loan you what they call this is a confessed judgment in the deed of trust you confessed
[01:09:21.480 --> 01:09:31.000]  a judgment in the case of a default but don't did we none of us really knew that when we were
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:41.320]  finding me that's any issue but that doesn't that doesn't render the deed of trust invalid or the
[01:09:41.960 --> 01:09:54.360]  authority or the ability of the lender to foreclose without a order from the court without a judgment
[01:09:54.360 --> 01:10:02.600]  from the court because you've already confessed the judgment okay but does it does this case
[01:10:03.160 --> 01:10:09.560]  allow us to say if we're considered indigent that we can request counsel
[01:10:10.680 --> 01:10:16.440]  that the court appoint us counsel and would that be a good thing or a bad thing based on
[01:10:16.440 --> 01:10:23.640]  your experience and my experience with with counsel anyway I would say that absolutely
[01:10:23.640 --> 01:10:31.640]  you should be able to request counsel and if the court denies you that counsel that gives
[01:10:31.640 --> 01:10:39.080]  you a great issue to appeal but I haven't looked at the case law surrounding that particular
[01:10:40.200 --> 01:10:45.080]  I'm going to send it to you because it says it starts with windows of the small claims court
[01:10:45.080 --> 01:10:51.560]  the California Supreme Court has created a right to the assistance of counsel in several cases
[01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:55.480]  which is indistinguishable from the language of the Sixth Amendment
[01:11:00.440 --> 01:11:08.680]  so that seems to say that we can have that and further to that which I've just
[01:11:08.680 --> 01:11:21.640]  realized that the California trial court the Supreme Court here has said that in the present
[01:11:21.640 --> 01:11:27.160]  case after it demonstrates the absence of a court reporter a trial court proceeding and a resulting
[01:11:27.160 --> 01:11:34.360]  lack of a vaping record of such proceedings will frequently be fatal to litigants appellate
[01:11:34.360 --> 01:11:43.000]  the opinion says it says the in this case of Jameson Speedway the status the California
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.280]  Supreme Court said it did not ask whether Jameson wanted to record the proceedings or pay for
[01:11:48.280 --> 01:11:53.800]  less expensive short-term reporter therefore there was no transcript available when Jameson
[01:11:53.800 --> 01:12:00.120]  appealed eventual ruling the grant of non-suit support of appeal the court found that without
[01:12:00.120 --> 01:12:05.320]  such a record it could not reach the merits of Jameson's argument that the trial court got it
[01:12:05.320 --> 01:12:11.800]  wrong he argued that the case should therefore be reversed and amended for a new trial that includes
[01:12:11.800 --> 01:12:19.480]  a court reporter but the court of appeal found no legal error California Supreme Court took the
[01:12:19.480 --> 01:12:25.800]  case said to determine the validity of the policy of not providing court reporters even for
[01:12:25.800 --> 01:12:33.160]  indigent litigants over vaping granted fee waivers unanimously the court ruled against this policy
[01:12:33.160 --> 01:12:40.280]  finding it inconsistent with trial court decisions on litigants proceeding in formal purpose as well
[01:12:40.280 --> 01:12:49.400]  as California's general policy of facilitating access to the court and so it's basically saying
[01:12:49.400 --> 01:12:59.080]  here that California Supreme Court rules that indigent litigants are entitled to free court
[01:12:59.080 --> 01:13:06.680]  reporters if one is not already provided and this was apparently ruled in 2018
[01:13:08.440 --> 01:13:18.520]  that's pretty standard as far as court reporters in Texas if you are declared indigent the court
[01:13:18.520 --> 01:13:27.640]  reporter must provide your transcripts for free but if there are no court reporters provided
[01:13:27.640 --> 01:13:35.960]  unless you order one as in California how would anyone know that they're entitled to a free court
[01:13:35.960 --> 01:13:46.360]  reporter that how would anyone know is really the problem we just it's our responsibility to find
[01:13:46.360 --> 01:13:56.120]  that out but how does an indigent person ever figure out that this is even a possibility
[01:13:58.120 --> 01:14:03.240]  because they don't advertise it they don't tell you even though they know that you've been declared
[01:14:03.240 --> 01:14:10.360]  indigent then you can have fee waivers wouldn't it be appropriate that they say you know you have
[01:14:10.360 --> 01:14:18.360]  the right to a reporter free report it if you so desire but they don't do that yes that does
[01:14:18.360 --> 01:14:25.320]  sound appropriate but that's something you would have to encourage the legislature to require
[01:14:27.960 --> 01:14:34.920]  another fight another fight if it's not in law now then it may be unjust but it is
[01:14:34.920 --> 01:14:44.200]  the law is what it is well I wish that had known this in my last case because I would have asked
[01:14:44.200 --> 01:14:52.600]  for a court reporter but I will be asking for one in this in this new case I will be I will be
[01:14:52.600 --> 01:15:01.480]  requesting that of the court to you know create an official verbatim record but I will be letting
[01:15:01.480 --> 01:15:07.720]  Ted Scarlett know he probably doesn't know this either if he's indigent and has been declared
[01:15:07.720 --> 01:15:12.760]  indigent he's entitled to a free court reporter that's going to cost him a lot of money for all
[01:15:12.760 --> 01:15:19.800]  the hearings they put him into yes he's he's going to like that part yeah he sure is
[01:15:22.200 --> 01:15:27.000]  and then the last thing I wanted to talk about was what we spoke about before is this
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:35.560]  ability through Fiverr.com for people who you know don't have a lot of experience in writing
[01:15:36.840 --> 01:15:43.960]  their cases out and researching case law and putting everything into the correct format
[01:15:45.160 --> 01:15:53.960]  as you've seen in one of my filings I've had some good results with using this service
[01:15:53.960 --> 01:16:03.720]  and it's very very affordable my last you know writing cost $100 to you know put it into the
[01:16:03.720 --> 01:16:11.320]  correct format put the case size put you know everything into the right vehicle format with
[01:16:11.320 --> 01:16:19.320]  the page numbers and all this other stuff it's you know it's something that you have to when
[01:16:19.320 --> 01:16:25.720]  you go on there you have to search for the ones that speak English you have to look at their
[01:16:25.720 --> 01:16:32.280]  you know reviews and pick you know if they're a top tier or second tier seller and I've had a
[01:16:32.280 --> 01:16:36.520]  couple of cases so I think you're running me off the cliff Randy it's all your fault
[01:16:37.640 --> 01:16:41.400]  no it's Preston on it no no Brad would never do that to me
[01:16:41.400 --> 01:16:47.720]  okay hang on we'll be right back
[01:17:00.040 --> 01:17:04.520]  are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even losses
[01:17:05.160 --> 01:17:10.760]  stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method Michael Maris has won six cases
[01:17:10.760 --> 01:17:16.200]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two you'll get step by step instructions
[01:17:16.200 --> 01:17:21.480]  in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do when
[01:17:21.480 --> 01:17:27.000]  contacted by phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.600]  collectors out of your credit report how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[01:17:32.600 --> 01:17:38.440]  to go away the Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:17:38.440 --> 01:17:44.200]  personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.200 --> 01:17:51.560]  and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com that's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:59.400]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:18:00.120 --> 01:18:05.000]  I love logos without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends I'm so
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.360]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back I need my truth pick I'd be lost without logos
[01:18:10.360 --> 01:18:14.840]  and I really want to help keep this network on the air I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[01:18:14.840 --> 01:18:19.400]  but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on
[01:18:19.400 --> 01:18:25.800]  supplements how can I help logos well I'm glad you asked whenever you order anything from amazon
[01:18:25.800 --> 01:18:30.760]  you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your
[01:18:30.760 --> 01:18:38.520]  cookies now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com click on the amazon logo and bookmark it now when you order
[01:18:38.520 --> 01:18:45.160]  anything from amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do I pay extra no do you have to
[01:18:45.160 --> 01:18:52.280]  do anything different when I order no can I use my amazon pride no I mean yes wow giving without
[01:18:52.280 --> 01:18:58.680]  doing anything or spending any money this is perfect thank you so much we are welcome happy
[01:18:58.680 --> 01:19:08.120]  holidays logos this is the logos radio
[01:19:08.120 --> 01:19:25.560]  oh come on
[01:19:25.560 --> 01:19:29.000]  oh
[01:19:35.560 --> 01:19:39.000]  if I can't get everything I want
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  we're gonna break you
[01:19:46.840 --> 01:19:49.000]  if I can't get everything I need
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  okay we are back brandy kelton brett fountain real live radio and
[01:19:58.040 --> 01:20:07.720]  tina it will be sending me the names of fiber contractors that have done good work for her
[01:20:07.720 --> 01:20:15.160]  it's he she can vouch for so if you're producing documents in your you're not sure how to get them
[01:20:15.160 --> 01:20:23.160]  in right form contact me send me an email I'll get it to to tina and she'll try to help find
[01:20:23.160 --> 01:20:30.280]  you a contractor who can do what you need it'll save you a lot of money and keep you from making a
[01:20:30.280 --> 01:20:36.600]  lot of these minor little errors that make us crazy tina you got anything else for us
[01:20:37.880 --> 01:20:44.600]  I don't know I just wanted to share that you know definitely got some issues with my appeal
[01:20:44.600 --> 01:20:49.560]  and what the judge said but uh I'll save that for chatting with you later because I'm sure you've
[01:20:49.560 --> 01:20:56.840]  got other people to talk to tonight yes we do we have a full board right now yeah so thank you
[01:20:56.840 --> 01:21:04.200]  thank you very much and I'm sorry I kept you holding this along but Robert Nathan uh and
[01:21:04.200 --> 01:21:10.360]  Nathaniel just happened to step on my favorite subject and you know how I am about that and
[01:21:10.360 --> 01:21:16.040]  it I know you all but it's all good learning for all of us you know listening into everybody's
[01:21:16.040 --> 01:21:22.520]  concerns and issues so yeah good to know that okay fighting okay thank you tina
[01:21:24.760 --> 01:21:30.440]  now we're yeah we're going to go to what appears to be a first-time caller if you are in the Chicago
[01:21:30.440 --> 01:21:43.320]  area and you are on the call speak up hello hello can you give us a first name
[01:21:45.320 --> 01:21:54.600]  my first name is Valerie hello Valerie and I take it you're in the Chicago area I am okay what do
[01:21:54.600 --> 01:22:05.560]  you have for us today well I wanted to hopefully get some help with the foreclosure of a rental
[01:22:05.560 --> 01:22:13.480]  property that I have that was quick claim to me and I'm trying to save the home my cousin
[01:22:13.480 --> 01:22:25.480]  quick claimed it to me back in 2017 because she was ill and just recently about 2019 I got a letter
[01:22:25.480 --> 01:22:32.280]  in the mail saying that there was a docket number to it so I called her and I served did she ever
[01:22:32.280 --> 01:22:41.160]  get served she said no she never was served by our server you know but there is a docket number which
[01:22:41.160 --> 01:22:46.760]  meant they have been the court but because she had showed up they kept you know bringing it back
[01:22:46.760 --> 01:22:54.040]  and bringing it back because we are not judicial I mean a judicial state yes yes and it's pretty
[01:22:54.040 --> 01:23:02.360]  easy to beat them up for quite a while if they fail to do proper service you and you are you have a
[01:23:02.360 --> 01:23:13.960]  quick claim it is the quick claim filed with the with the registrar of deeds yes okay county cook
[01:23:13.960 --> 01:23:20.200]  county and but the mortgage is still in her name so that's where I'm trying to figure out
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:29.880]  what's best to do to save the home and what vehicle to use to save the home okay okay that
[01:23:29.880 --> 01:23:39.480]  we got lots of tools for that but we would need to do that off the air there are a mirrored of
[01:23:39.480 --> 01:23:48.920]  claims you can bring against the lender how old is the mortgage she bought it in 2008 and I want to
[01:23:48.920 --> 01:24:02.200]  say the base okay did you say 2008 $28,000 okay you broke up there say that again
[01:24:03.640 --> 01:24:13.080]  they're saying she owes about $228,000 okay we can we got lots of waste to handle these guys
[01:24:13.080 --> 01:24:19.160]  there are more claims that you can make than I'd have time to talk about here on the air okay I
[01:24:19.160 --> 01:24:24.280]  used to do seminars on this and I did a two-day seminar on this subject so there's lots of things
[01:24:24.280 --> 01:24:35.400]  you can go after them with if they have filed against the person named on the mortgage there is
[01:24:35.400 --> 01:24:49.320]  an issue that arises here the quick claim may not be valid because the in order to quick claim a
[01:24:49.320 --> 01:24:57.480]  property that you have a mortgage on you have to have the permission of the lender so they can
[01:24:57.480 --> 01:25:07.720]  challenge the quick claim and let them so you would file as an intervener as the necessary party
[01:25:10.120 --> 01:25:17.800]  since you are in the record they knew about you and chose to ignore you so you file as an
[01:25:17.800 --> 01:25:28.120]  intervener and if there has been any rulings in the case okay to your knowledge has there did
[01:25:28.120 --> 01:25:38.680]  they give summary judgment in the case um okay a summary judgment I'm not sure what that means
[01:25:38.680 --> 01:25:46.280]  but I would say no that's what happens when you file a suit and the opposing party doesn't respond
[01:25:46.280 --> 01:25:54.280]  then the petitioner can move for summary judgment or I'm sorry for default judgment
[01:25:56.520 --> 01:26:01.720]  but default judgments are really easy to overturn if there has been one then you just
[01:26:01.720 --> 01:26:10.280]  file a notice of motion to reconsider for lack of proper service
[01:26:10.280 --> 01:26:20.600]  okay but we can't help you much until we actually know what the state of the property is right now
[01:26:22.200 --> 01:26:29.080]  okay so when and how do I get back to you because I can gather up everything and do
[01:26:29.080 --> 01:26:39.960]  okay here's here's what you do you go to the county recorder and get an electronic copy if
[01:26:39.960 --> 01:26:50.040]  possible of every document filed with the county recorder's office since the your cousin received
[01:26:50.040 --> 01:27:03.320]  a warranty deed okay and then I need the note deed of mortgage truth and lending statement
[01:27:03.960 --> 01:27:17.480]  hard one settlement statement okay and then if she has some notices regular payment notices
[01:27:17.480 --> 01:27:26.600]  from the bank we want to see what the bank was charging her a lot of these people do foreclosures
[01:27:26.600 --> 01:27:35.960]  and they always try to say that the property was securitized the lender doesn't have standing
[01:27:35.960 --> 01:27:43.240]  and blah blah blah all that's been ruled against over and over and over so take out the contract
[01:27:43.240 --> 01:27:51.480]  and read it twice right take the mortgage and then read the note do you know if the note is
[01:27:51.480 --> 01:28:03.800]  a fixed rate or variable it's fixed okay then we want to look at the bills that that she did
[01:28:03.800 --> 01:28:12.280]  your cousin has received and then compare what the you're being billed with what your calculation
[01:28:12.280 --> 01:28:22.360]  say you should be billed they always screw that up and then I have a an analysis analysis I can run
[01:28:23.560 --> 01:28:31.400]  on the hard one settlement statement when the lender provides you with a hard one settlement
[01:28:31.400 --> 01:28:39.000]  statement it lists all the fees they charge in creating a mortgage but they don't give you any
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:45.640]  evidence to show that the fees were not otherwise forbidden to be charged by law that they were for
[01:28:45.640 --> 01:28:52.760]  services actually rendered let me take a step back not otherwise forbidden by law anything that is a
[01:28:52.760 --> 01:28:59.800]  normal part of doing business is intended to be taken out of the interest you pay and not charged
[01:28:59.800 --> 01:29:04.520]  on the HUD one if it's charged on the HUD one then you wind up paying interest on it for 30 years
[01:29:04.520 --> 01:29:10.680]  so make sure it's not otherwise forbidden by law that it was for services actually rendered
[01:29:11.480 --> 01:29:18.120]  that the services were necessary that the amounts charged were reasonable and the lender did not
[01:29:18.120 --> 01:29:25.560]  take an undisclosed markup on the amounts charged they never give you receipts so you assume that
[01:29:25.560 --> 01:29:33.080]  every one of those charges are bogus take it off the head of the note we calculate the note with
[01:29:33.080 --> 01:29:39.800]  that amount except taking out I'll give you between two and three times the original
[01:29:41.320 --> 01:29:47.160]  mortgage as a claim against the lender that'll get their attention hang on Randy Kelton Brett
[01:29:47.160 --> 01:30:05.080]  Fountain a little radio we'll be right back at top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America
[01:30:05.080 --> 01:30:10.920]  if you build an electrical smart grid the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic black
[01:30:10.920 --> 01:30:17.080]  out under your count for an all-break back with the shocking details in a moment privacy is under
[01:30:17.080 --> 01:30:22.520]  attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again and once your privacy
[01:30:22.520 --> 01:30:28.760]  is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect your rights say no to
[01:30:28.760 --> 01:30:35.080]  surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this message is
[01:30:35.080 --> 01:30:41.400]  brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine alternative to google yahoo and bing
[01:30:41.400 --> 01:30:48.920]  start over with start page governments love power so it's only natural they'd want to control the
[01:30:48.920 --> 01:30:54.200]  power going into your home too with the smart grid so they're installing a national network of
[01:30:54.200 --> 01:31:00.600]  smart meters to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure but cybersecurity
[01:31:00.600 --> 01:31:05.560]  expert david chalk says not so fast if we make the national power grid controllable through
[01:31:05.560 --> 01:31:11.160]  the web hackers will have a field day working remotely they could tap in and black out the
[01:31:11.160 --> 01:31:17.720]  entire nation leaving us vulnerable to our enemies i'd want to pose smart meters for privacy and
[01:31:17.720 --> 01:31:23.080]  health reasons the catastrophic failures caused by hackers there's nothing smart about that
[01:31:23.080 --> 01:31:31.960]  like dr catrin albright first page dot com the world's most private search engine this is building
[01:31:31.960 --> 01:31:37.320]  seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of september 11 the government says
[01:31:37.320 --> 01:31:43.080]  that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled
[01:31:43.080 --> 01:31:47.480]  demolition over 6000 my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my
[01:31:47.480 --> 01:31:52.040]  fellow first responders are playing i'm not a conspiracy theorist structural engineer new york
[01:31:52.040 --> 01:31:56.680]  city correction office i'm an air force pilot i'm a father who lost his son we're americans
[01:31:56.680 --> 01:32:04.440]  and we deserve the truth go to rememberbuildingseven.org today rule of law radio is proud to offer the
[01:32:04.440 --> 01:32:08.680]  rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we live in an us against them society and if we the
[01:32:08.680 --> 01:32:12.760]  people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own
[01:32:12.760 --> 01:32:16.840]  rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place the right to act in
[01:32:16.840 --> 01:32:21.080]  our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law traffic courts
[01:32:21.080 --> 01:32:25.080]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[01:32:25.080 --> 01:32:29.400]  through due process former sheriff's deputy eddie craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has
[01:32:29.400 --> 01:32:33.320]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due
[01:32:33.320 --> 01:32:37.720]  process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law you can get your own copy of this invaluable
[01:32:37.720 --> 01:32:42.120]  material by going to rule of law radio dot com and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll
[01:32:42.120 --> 01:32:46.680]  receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of
[01:32:46.680 --> 01:32:51.320]  the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:32:51.320 --> 01:32:54.520]  learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from rule of law radio
[01:32:54.520 --> 01:32:59.240]  dot com order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[01:32:59.240 --> 01:33:15.240]  you are listening to the logos radio network logos radio network
[01:33:29.240 --> 01:33:41.720]  okay we are back randy kelton brett fountain
[01:33:41.720 --> 01:34:06.440]  rule of law radio and holly is that right valerie it's valerie valerie i was close i need to take more zink okay okay get me those documents okay and i will look at them and most of the
[01:34:06.440 --> 01:34:17.080]  documents other than the public the county recorder's office should be in a package or a cd that your cousin
[01:34:17.080 --> 01:34:28.680]  received at closing if you have it on a cd just open the cd and pull out the documents i need as best if i
[01:34:28.680 --> 01:34:38.200]  have them in electronic format if you have to get them in hard copies see if you can scan them in make sure
[01:34:38.200 --> 01:34:44.040]  when you scan them in you scan if a document has more than one page you scan them all as
[01:34:44.040 --> 01:34:52.920]  either one document or one email okay if you scan if you scan them in order then the scanner will if it
[01:34:52.920 --> 01:34:59.880]  doesn't scan them all as one document it'll make images of them and name them in consecutive order
[01:34:59.880 --> 01:35:09.720]  that way i can capture those images drop them in a word document export them as a pdf open them in
[01:35:09.720 --> 01:35:16.200]  acrobat do character recognition on them export them back out as a word document and i've got real
[01:35:16.200 --> 01:35:25.080]  documents so i can handle those it's best if in their order and the worst thing is upside down upside
[01:35:25.080 --> 01:35:31.400]  down makes me crazy because i have to turn them all over and then reposition every document takes me
[01:35:31.400 --> 01:35:39.800]  a lot of time so try to make sure that they're right side up and in order okay do you have any
[01:35:39.800 --> 01:35:48.280]  problems call me uh my number is nine four zero three nine nine nine nine two two
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:54.280]  early in the morning it's better than late in the evening about eleven
[01:35:55.160 --> 01:36:02.600]  twelve o'clock or so my phone really blows up okay i'll be early bird when i call you nine four
[01:36:02.600 --> 01:36:11.160]  zero three nine nine nine two two yes and uh we need to talk off here because it'll take too long
[01:36:11.160 --> 01:36:16.840]  in there to explain all this but once i've got those documents then i can give you a better idea
[01:36:16.840 --> 01:36:26.360]  where you're at okay i understand i overstand and i understand thank you very much okay thank you
[01:36:26.360 --> 01:36:34.520]  okay now we're going to go to penny in texas hello penny what do you have for us today hey randy
[01:36:35.160 --> 01:36:44.520]  hi brit i'm just wondering um you know that there's people being hurt by this vaccination
[01:36:44.520 --> 01:36:50.120]  which is really not a vaccination but a gene therapy and i'm just you know they say that the
[01:36:50.120 --> 01:36:54.200]  pharmaceutical companies are not going to be held liable at all for any damages or harm
[01:36:54.200 --> 01:37:03.480]  and they're already being sued by states i'm sorry what they're already being sued by a couple of
[01:37:03.480 --> 01:37:11.000]  states uh they called it a vaccine but it's not a vaccine armed so they're not going to
[01:37:11.560 --> 01:37:17.640]  and part of it is they've been caught in some pretty serious lies and that makes it fraud and
[01:37:17.640 --> 01:37:24.440]  that meat meat meaty mitigates everything wait that's not the right term what's the right term
[01:37:28.440 --> 01:37:38.360]  anyway it if they've lied to us then you can still sue them okay that's all i that's all i
[01:37:38.360 --> 01:37:43.560]  really wanted to to know okay well they're not getting close to me with one of those needles
[01:37:43.560 --> 01:37:54.920]  unless they can run faster mad than i can't steered okay thank you penny i need
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:02.680]  okay now we're going to jane in texas hello jane what do you have for us today
[01:38:03.720 --> 01:38:09.560]  hi well uh i'm getting out of court on monday morning and i know you already know this um
[01:38:09.560 --> 01:38:13.320]  um so i'm kind of thinking that maybe we could do some role play
[01:38:16.600 --> 01:38:20.360]  uh uh britt i didn't know she was kinky
[01:38:23.320 --> 01:38:25.480]  and okay uh are you hitting on me
[01:38:25.480 --> 01:38:37.720]  um yeah uh probably a good idea i don't know this is your first time in court
[01:38:38.440 --> 01:38:44.520]  it's yes it's so new and strange you you really don't know what to do so that would that might
[01:38:44.520 --> 01:38:58.600]  be a good idea um do you have uh i have the thing in front of me okay well okay what are you okay
[01:38:58.600 --> 01:39:06.360]  you're going to go into court uh the uh what i would like to do send me that document i will
[01:39:06.360 --> 01:39:11.720]  make some adjustments fix that type or your head and we will file it as an amended pleading and
[01:39:11.720 --> 01:39:23.560]  nuns protoc okay nuns protoc means there are no substantive changes just uh essentially typos
[01:39:24.840 --> 01:39:33.000]  right and that'll get you've got one unfortunate uh typo in there that we need to adjust so we'll
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:38.600]  make some minor adjustments so it reads better and then when you get into court notify the court
[01:39:38.600 --> 01:39:44.200]  that you have a amended pleading to correct some minor typos because you're in a hurry to produce
[01:39:44.200 --> 01:39:53.320]  get the document out in time and okay one one thing the only thing before the court initially
[01:39:53.960 --> 01:39:56.600]  is your challenge to subject matter jurisdiction
[01:39:58.920 --> 01:40:02.680]  motion motion to dismiss for failure to state of claim
[01:40:02.680 --> 01:40:13.080]  what do you what do you do off track what do you tell the judge okay oh you're asking me okay
[01:40:13.080 --> 01:40:20.200]  so uh you're asking me um you're asking me why i'm saying this or why i'm asking this of the judge
[01:40:21.320 --> 01:40:27.240]  miss jane you have filed a motion a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction will you explain
[01:40:27.240 --> 01:40:38.600]  the nature of your claim uh the plaintiff has failed to show or to prove subject matter jurisdiction
[01:40:39.480 --> 01:40:45.720]  for because of the lack of evidence in her claim or the lack of uh tally see that's what i'm saying
[01:40:48.840 --> 01:40:56.520]  i know so now bratt you act like to shock the attorney over there okay hang on uh you know i
[01:40:56.520 --> 01:41:04.680]  am here at arm's length to the court is it what's going yet i'll start the hearing and uh the judge
[01:41:04.680 --> 01:41:10.040]  will start to do something and if he doesn't go straight to your subject matter jurisdiction
[01:41:10.040 --> 01:41:18.360]  challenge you say your honor i'm here at arm's length to the court i have a challenge to subject
[01:41:18.360 --> 01:41:26.680]  matter jurisdiction before the court and the judge should know what that means if he doesn't
[01:41:26.680 --> 01:41:33.160]  you and if he tries to move ahead with anything else objection a subject matter jurisdiction
[01:41:33.160 --> 01:41:40.600]  challenge is a threshold issue you must determine jurisdiction before you can move to the merits
[01:41:40.600 --> 01:41:50.760]  of the case okay and then you tell the judge the complaint is simply insufficient to invoke
[01:41:50.760 --> 01:41:58.200]  the subject matter jurisdiction of the court give me your now give me your assessment of the
[01:41:58.200 --> 01:42:10.760]  the claim of her claim yep no your turn your turn to try it your turn to start and say the
[01:42:10.760 --> 01:42:15.480]  same kind of thing tell me what's wrong with the petition the original petition
[01:42:15.480 --> 01:42:27.720]  uh it fell to invoke jurisdiction for jurisdiction tell me why it fails to invoke jurisdiction
[01:42:27.720 --> 01:42:38.600]  because i because she has no evidence of injury and no uh no right that the defendant has violated
[01:42:38.600 --> 01:42:50.920]  jenna uh okay okay back up back up the the plaintiff failed to properly state a claim
[01:42:51.880 --> 01:43:00.920]  oh she she alleged i acted wrongfully and claims generally that i violated a bunch of laws
[01:43:00.920 --> 01:43:11.160]  but she failed to specify or failed to that i violated some homeowner association
[01:43:12.120 --> 01:43:21.400]  uh covenants or guidelines what do they call rules there um that rules and vcrs too so
[01:43:21.400 --> 01:43:32.920]  so she she failed to specify any rule that i have violated and establish evidence to show
[01:43:32.920 --> 01:43:40.360]  that i violated that rule okay okay therefore i don't know how to defend myself your honor i
[01:43:40.360 --> 01:43:54.120]  don't have a sufficient notice okay okay you do it all right when we come back
[01:43:56.440 --> 01:43:58.840]  brad was gonna let me run out the clip we'll be right back
[01:44:00.360 --> 01:44:06.280]  through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition
[01:44:06.280 --> 01:44:11.160]  people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that
[01:44:11.160 --> 01:44:17.400]  our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:44:17.400 --> 01:44:23.800]  in a world where natural foods have been irradiated adulterated and mutilated young jevity can provide
[01:44:23.800 --> 01:44:29.880]  the nutrients you need logos radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products
[01:44:29.880 --> 01:44:35.400]  most of which we reject we have come to trust young jevity so much we became a marketing
[01:44:35.400 --> 01:44:41.800]  distributor along with alex jones bin fuchs and many others when you order from logos radio
[01:44:41.800 --> 01:44:48.360]  network dot com your health will improve as you help support quality radio as you realize the
[01:44:48.360 --> 01:44:55.160]  benefits of young jevity you may want to join us as a distributor you can experience improved health
[01:44:55.160 --> 01:44:59.640]  help your friends and family and increase your income order now
[01:44:59.640 --> 01:45:09.640]  are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary
[01:45:09.640 --> 01:45:16.040]  the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show you how in 24 hours
[01:45:16.040 --> 01:45:22.920]  step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer
[01:45:22.920 --> 01:45:28.760]  know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step course and now
[01:45:28.760 --> 01:45:35.320]  you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning
[01:45:35.320 --> 01:45:41.320]  experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:41.320 --> 01:45:47.640]  the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive our audio classroom
[01:45:47.640 --> 01:45:55.880]  video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases prosa tactics and much more please visit luleblah
[01:45:55.880 --> 01:46:11.800]  radio dot com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866 law easy
[01:46:26.280 --> 01:46:41.320]  okay we are back randy carleton brett fountains will relate radio in our last segment
[01:46:42.120 --> 01:46:51.160]  on this friday the fourth day of june 2021 and jane let's call tomorrow let's do this tomorrow
[01:46:51.160 --> 01:46:59.640]  this is going to take way too much time to try to do on the radio okay let's call tomorrow and
[01:46:59.640 --> 01:47:06.440]  we'll do a zoom or something and i will work you over okay i don't have a new link but uh i guess
[01:47:06.440 --> 01:47:11.880]  i can figure out how to do that i had to go to meeting but i don't know if y'all use that well
[01:47:11.880 --> 01:47:16.600]  well if what i can do if i send you a zoom invitation you don't have zoom you click on it
[01:47:16.600 --> 01:47:23.880]  it will automatically load zoom and open it that won't be a problem we handle that to me okay okay
[01:47:23.880 --> 01:47:31.320]  so but just are you is it time to go or you want brach yes i have a another first time caller and
[01:47:31.320 --> 01:47:37.800]  i'd like to get them before we run out of time all right okay good night thank you so so get on
[01:47:37.800 --> 01:47:44.920]  telegram in the morning and we'll set something up okay sounds good okay thank you jane okay now
[01:47:44.920 --> 01:47:56.280]  we're going to uh someone in houston if you were in houston talk to us okay randy my name is john
[01:47:56.280 --> 01:48:03.720]  and uh although i haven't talked to you on the phone before i had sent you a email uh regarding
[01:48:03.720 --> 01:48:11.800]  a quo warrant on governor abbott and so i just wanted to bring you up to speed on that uh the
[01:48:11.800 --> 01:48:19.480]  harris county district attorney rejected that uh saying uh that those has already been ruled on
[01:48:19.480 --> 01:48:30.600]  back in 2013 and so uh she wait what had been ruled on in 2013 uh the oath of office of the
[01:48:30.600 --> 01:48:41.400]  texas elected officials what did it rule uh it ruled that they were sufficient to meet the federal
[01:48:41.400 --> 01:48:48.680]  requirement oh okay so you're you're not saying you didn't have an oath you're saying had the wrong
[01:48:48.680 --> 01:48:56.440]  oath uh well that well more not i said that they didn't take the correct oath of office
[01:48:58.280 --> 01:49:05.720]  oh okay so and uh well there's another way to go after him core until
[01:49:05.720 --> 01:49:17.160]  though but now i went after him criminally and anytime a public official is convicted of
[01:49:18.120 --> 01:49:22.280]  a crime related to his office then he's subject to core until removal
[01:49:23.480 --> 01:49:30.280]  yeah but but then again it is the prosecutor who must do it but if the prosecutor refuses
[01:49:30.280 --> 01:49:37.960]  you can certainly go after the prosecutor but if the prosecutor in houston has stated that this has
[01:49:37.960 --> 01:49:43.720]  already been ruled on then then it wouldn't do any good to try to go after him on that
[01:49:44.760 --> 01:49:49.000]  yeah and i understand that i just wanted to bring you up to speed on that because uh
[01:49:49.720 --> 01:49:55.080]  you you know you had looked at it and you said it was written very well i appreciated that
[01:49:55.080 --> 01:50:00.680]  because that was your first attempt at writing something like that well if that was your first
[01:50:00.680 --> 01:50:09.320]  attempt uh do you have talent well i've studied wow so but i wanted to ask you a question
[01:50:09.880 --> 01:50:17.560]  another thing i'm working on right now is uh i'm i'm looking at using uh notices and affidavits
[01:50:17.560 --> 01:50:25.880]  and uh i'm planning on sending uh the local countable here in my precinct a notice about
[01:50:26.920 --> 01:50:34.040]  their use of writing uh speeding tickets to uh people uh based on the speed limit signs
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:44.760]  as a constable well because uh where i live out in the county uh they're the ones that patrol
[01:50:44.760 --> 01:50:52.120]  the most often and they're the ones uh you know constantly pulling people over well and i've told
[01:50:52.120 --> 01:50:58.200]  a couple of them you know hey you know how i got wait a minute that's not there's another way to go
[01:50:58.200 --> 01:51:08.520]  after them uh the affidavit it may state facts to them but it doesn't invoke any duty it doesn't
[01:51:08.520 --> 01:51:16.440]  uh invoke any law unless the affidavits different than less your definition of affidavits different
[01:51:16.440 --> 01:51:25.000]  than mine my definition of affidavit is statement of facts correct either assertions or denials
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:32.280]  but it's saying here's the truth yeah and so it does it well here is the truth now that goes to
[01:51:32.280 --> 01:51:38.760]  a it appears to go to a legal opinion
[01:51:41.240 --> 01:51:46.040]  and that affidavit wouldn't be right the right vehicle for legal opinion
[01:51:47.800 --> 01:51:55.880]  well yes and i agree with you on that uh so that's why i said notices and affidavits
[01:51:55.880 --> 01:52:05.000]  so i want to send them a notice first saying look here is the here is the statute are the
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:11.960]  texas transportation code regarding speed signs which is strictly for commercial motor vehicles
[01:52:12.840 --> 01:52:19.640]  so any speeding ticket that you write to a person who's not driving a commercial motor vehicle
[01:52:19.640 --> 01:52:26.840]  when you base it upon the posted speed limit signs then you are in fact writing a illegal ticket
[01:52:28.680 --> 01:52:30.440]  okay but you're starting in the middle
[01:52:33.240 --> 01:52:41.240]  always you want to go to subject matter jurisdiction okay first where did a constable
[01:52:41.240 --> 01:52:52.440]  get authority to enforce texas transportation code well that's a good question because i don't
[01:52:52.440 --> 01:53:03.080]  have the answer to that i i do you do oh yeah he never got authority to enforce the texas
[01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:10.120]  transportation code there are two entities who can enforce the texas transportation code one of
[01:53:10.120 --> 01:53:17.640]  them is department of public safety and they were created for that purpose the other is a traffic
[01:53:17.640 --> 01:53:27.720]  control officer the traffic control officer must be a sheriff deputy who is employed by the sheriff
[01:53:29.080 --> 01:53:38.680]  and the deputy must be certified and he must be appointed by the county commissioners court as a
[01:53:38.680 --> 01:53:48.680]  public public as a traffic control officer paid by the county commissioners court and ride
[01:53:48.680 --> 01:54:03.720]  a motorcycle 701.001 through 003 texas transportation code now i can establish that those two entities
[01:54:03.720 --> 01:54:15.080]  are authorized to enforce the code the legislature said these two entities can enforce the code
[01:54:15.880 --> 01:54:24.680]  and uh eddie what's uh eddie brett what's eddie's favorite saying about what's not included
[01:54:24.680 --> 01:54:36.920]  what is excluded huh i don't think he has he says that in latin but the legislature included
[01:54:37.720 --> 01:54:47.560]  these two entities that means they excluded everybody else okay so the last time a sheriff's
[01:54:47.560 --> 01:54:59.480]  deputy turned his lights on me he was in a uh cruiser so i call 911 there was no inclement
[01:54:59.480 --> 01:55:04.680]  weather and he wasn't wearing a ride the motorcycle so i had reason to believe and did believe
[01:55:04.680 --> 01:55:10.280]  that when he turned those lights on me he did not have authority to force me to pull over because
[01:55:10.280 --> 01:55:15.160]  the only authority for that is in the transportation code and he didn't have authority to enforce
[01:55:15.160 --> 01:55:20.920]  transportation code and since i had reason to believe and did believe that he was wearing a
[01:55:20.920 --> 01:55:27.800]  pistol on his hip as turned out he was i considered that an act first degree felony aggravated
[01:55:27.800 --> 01:55:41.400]  assault criminal violation 2202 b2a let's dance guys that was so much fun he pulled me over and he
[01:55:41.400 --> 01:55:45.240]  came up to the window and he said mr count you know why i pulled you over i said no but i'm sure
[01:55:45.240 --> 01:55:52.200]  you're going to tell me well your registration is expired i said only two years what's the problem
[01:55:53.080 --> 01:56:03.800]  he went to write the ticket i call 911 i want him arrested point is that the issue about the
[01:56:03.800 --> 01:56:12.920]  speed limit signs is goes to the merits and these guys hadn't got past subject matter jurisdiction
[01:56:12.920 --> 01:56:21.880]  yet yeah i see what you're saying there can you just quickly i got a pen in my hand now give me
[01:56:21.880 --> 01:56:35.000]  that 701 what was it 701 point 001 through 003 okay very good now now there is a section that
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:44.040]  authorized that allows a municipal police officer to become authorized to do dott inspections
[01:56:44.040 --> 01:56:53.880]  and that's i forget 614 brett 44 yeah 6 okay 644 so that's not everything you can't do just
[01:56:54.680 --> 01:57:01.240]  stopping for everything he wants to it's just that just 10 inspections and then that's only if you
[01:57:01.240 --> 01:57:09.560]  fall within if he has evidence you fall within dott and that means you have a dott sticker on your
[01:57:09.560 --> 01:57:17.320]  vehicle or don't you can't you have like hazmat placards or i know you're required to depending
[01:57:17.320 --> 01:57:25.960]  on what you're holding commercially but if you're in a private conveyance that has
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:32.600]  license plates on it and you have a driver's license that authorizes you to act in commerce
[01:57:32.600 --> 01:57:42.760]  that conveyance can be used in a non-commercial capacity so the first question the officer
[01:57:42.760 --> 01:57:52.360]  has to ask you are you transporting persons or property for hire if he hasn't asked that question
[01:57:52.360 --> 01:58:01.880]  him he hasn't established an essential element of the crime and in dott they can stop you
[01:58:05.640 --> 01:58:12.520]  without being an infraction just to inspect that's all he does he gets to do is inspect
[01:58:12.520 --> 01:58:17.240]  and a lot of conditions for that if they write it they don't have the authority to write a ticket
[01:58:17.240 --> 01:58:26.360]  otherwise well okay hold on hold on we are out of time this is randy kelton brett fountain
[01:58:26.360 --> 01:58:31.720]  rule law radio but thank you all for listening you'll be back next week at a regular time
[01:58:31.720 --> 01:58:38.360]  eight o'clock central thursday for our two-hour show five before a four-hour show thank you all
[01:58:38.360 --> 01:58:50.120]  for listening and good night
[01:58:50.120 --> 01:58:56.600]  bibles for america is offering absolutely free a unique study bible called the new testament
[01:58:56.600 --> 01:59:02.040]  recovery version the new testament recovery version has over 9 000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.040 --> 01:59:08.440]  what the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god and to know the meaning of life order
[01:59:08.440 --> 01:59:17.160]  your free copy today from bibles for america call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us
[01:59:17.160 --> 01:59:25.160]  online at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13 000 cross
[01:59:25.160 --> 01:59:31.400]  references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the bible this is truly a bible
[01:59:31.400 --> 01:59:37.000]  you can understand to get your free copy of the new testament recovery version call us toll free
[01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:48.920]  at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:48.920 --> 01:59:59.880]  looking for some truth you found it logosradiotnetwork.com