[00:00.000 --> 00:07.040]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[00:07.040 --> 00:13.440]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.440 --> 00:21.760]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.760 --> 00:29.960]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.960 --> 00:41.720]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:46.200 --> 00:52.920]  Here in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated on
[00:52.920 --> 00:58.920]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and entering
[00:58.920 --> 01:09.320]  40 today in history. In recent news since the Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing
[01:09.320 --> 01:13.960]  hemp into Texas law back in June county prosecutors around the state including Houston,
[01:13.960 --> 01:18.360]  Austin, San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:18.360 --> 01:23.080]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:23.080 --> 01:28.280]  test the earth for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this
[01:28.280 --> 01:32.680]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:32.680 --> 01:37.320]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:37.320 --> 01:42.360]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.360 --> 01:48.600]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well
[01:48.600 --> 01:55.160]  as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayman Esparza a Democrat who also
[01:55.160 --> 01:59.960]  stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of
[01:59.960 --> 02:05.320]  marijuana cases in El Paso. However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball
[02:05.320 --> 02:10.440]  an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing
[02:10.440 --> 02:14.920]  on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is
[02:14.920 --> 02:24.360]  charged with something the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University
[02:24.360 --> 02:29.080]  identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the
[02:29.080 --> 02:34.920]  Gulf of Mexico the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded
[02:34.920 --> 02:40.360]  with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university
[02:40.360 --> 02:46.760]  paper the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is
[02:46.760 --> 02:54.920]  hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This was Ruff Rody with your
[02:54.920 --> 03:17.080]  lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:17.080 --> 03:45.240]  Okay we are back. Randy Kelton Brett Fountain River radio on this the 30th day of April 2020
[03:45.240 --> 03:54.600]  What Brett? Yes 21. Brett has to watch out for me because I'm a wood. I'm not going to mention
[03:54.600 --> 04:02.440]  him wiping the slobber off my chin anymore that seemed to bother him. Okay Chris yeah pattern
[04:03.000 --> 04:13.400]  jury charges. It is the duty of the court specifically the judge to determine the facts
[04:13.400 --> 04:17.400]  in accordance with the rules of evidence that apply the laws that comes to hear them to the facts in
[04:17.400 --> 04:26.920]  the case. The only facts and evidence that matters are facts and evidence that go to
[04:27.640 --> 04:35.720]  the elements of the cause of cause of action or claim. So it doesn't really matter that somebody's
[04:35.720 --> 04:45.480]  fat or that they they did something. Are you talking about me again Brett?
[04:49.320 --> 04:54.040]  Yeah only the elements cause at the end of the day the judge is going to take the pattern jury
[04:54.040 --> 05:00.520]  charges that lists all the elements. You must this is what you must find. Example fraud by
[05:00.520 --> 05:07.800]  non-disclosure. If you make a claim of fraud by non-disclosure and all of these causes of actions
[05:08.440 --> 05:14.840]  are defined in law and this is that's where you'll find them. Okay cause of action for
[05:14.840 --> 05:23.800]  fraud by non-disclosure you must allege that the defendant made a voluntary statement of fact
[05:23.800 --> 05:34.440]  that the voluntary statement of fact was not true. That the defendant knew the voluntary
[05:34.440 --> 05:44.200]  statement of fact was not true. That the defendant knew that you did not know that the statement
[05:44.200 --> 05:57.400]  was not true and that you did not have equal accident equal access to evidence to indicate
[05:57.400 --> 06:05.880]  to you that it was not true. That you accepted that it was true that you made decisions based
[06:05.880 --> 06:15.240]  on that acceptance and you were harmed thereby. If you don't allege and present evidence to
[06:15.240 --> 06:22.520]  support each of those elements the judge will tell the jury you cannot rule in his favor
[06:24.840 --> 06:30.520]  and the place to find those elements is you can you can look up the elements online
[06:30.520 --> 06:37.800]  I'm sorry look up the causes of action online and they will generally tell you what the elements
[06:37.800 --> 06:44.680]  are but if you're not sure look up pattern jury charges for fraud by non-disclosure
[06:46.440 --> 06:55.800]  and the courts over a period of years have developed charges that both sides can accept.
[06:55.800 --> 07:07.000]  They've been very well adjudicated and the judge will say this is what you must find. If you argue
[07:07.000 --> 07:14.360]  anything that's not in those elements you're wasting everybody's time and if you argue those things
[07:14.360 --> 07:20.920]  the lawyer on the other side will jump right on and fight you like a tiger because there's nothing
[07:20.920 --> 07:28.520]  he likes better than you running down a rabbit hole and he'll help you. So look at your suit if you
[07:28.520 --> 07:37.400]  have filed a suit and the suit does not allege all of these elements not a problem. So long as your
[07:37.400 --> 07:43.720]  suit is filed within the statute of limitations it doesn't really matter how crappy it is or what
[07:43.720 --> 07:51.320]  you might have missed or any of that because you can you always have one amended suit that you can
[07:51.320 --> 07:58.120]  file without permission of the court you can file other amended suits with permission of the court
[07:59.960 --> 08:07.800]  and this may not be the form to talk about that but how to get the judge to accept your filings
[08:07.800 --> 08:17.960]  and Olivier is on the line we'll get to him in a bit but Olivier filed a suit and the court
[08:18.680 --> 08:27.080]  denied his dismissed his suit without prejudice and we were talking about it and I've told him
[08:27.080 --> 08:32.600]  that the judge is going to tell you what you need to give him so he can rule in your favor.
[08:32.600 --> 08:38.760]  He's going to tell the other guy the same thing because he wants all the pertinent information
[08:38.760 --> 08:43.640]  so he can make the best ruling so when you read a ruling pay attention to it the judge
[08:43.640 --> 08:50.520]  is telling you what's wrong with it and what I suggested that he do is start out his pleading
[08:50.520 --> 08:59.000]  by saying the criticism criticism of the court is well taken and then argue why you think the
[08:59.000 --> 09:08.360]  criticism of the court was incorrect he did that the judge denied his next pleading and in his response
[09:09.080 --> 09:20.680]  remarked that the petitioner acknowledged that the court's criticisms were well taken
[09:20.680 --> 09:28.440]  and indicated that he hoped that the petitioner would take these criticisms as well
[09:31.080 --> 09:39.000]  he doesn't get that often he mostly gets people saying you're wrong you screwed this up blah blah
[09:39.000 --> 09:44.840]  blah but here the the petitioner is saying I recognize that you're giving me good information
[09:44.840 --> 09:51.400]  and I will try to fix this and it's not supposed to influence the judge but it does
[09:52.680 --> 10:01.560]  so point is look at all the elements of the crime of the issue argue each one of the elements
[10:02.120 --> 10:10.360]  you argue anything else the judge cannot pay attention to it so when you built this suit Chris
[10:10.360 --> 10:20.440]  did you look at something to show you what the elements of your claim was I did so all I had
[10:20.440 --> 10:25.160]  was fraud at that time and when I talked to the other lawyer I talked to a lawyer it's probably
[10:25.160 --> 10:30.520]  got 30 to 40 years experience well about 30 years experience and that's why he spent so much time
[10:30.520 --> 10:33.960]  on me because one he wanted to make sure he said first of all you need a ticket to the ball game
[10:33.960 --> 10:39.880]  so you need to get jurisdiction so he hammered me with that make sure you're very clear that this
[10:39.880 --> 10:43.640]  is the this is the court you need to be in you need to show the judge that that's what it is so
[10:43.640 --> 10:49.000]  he went over that now as far as the claims Randy I looked up two other well several actually
[10:50.200 --> 10:56.200]  federal lawsuits that made it into the court and are still in court one for fraud and another one
[10:56.200 --> 11:02.200]  for fraud and towing and I literally copied their claims just changed the stuff around
[11:03.000 --> 11:07.480]  and it had most of the elements you spoke about so I was not even worried about the claim
[11:07.480 --> 11:13.480]  because they were they were clearly accepted by other federal judges and two other courts and
[11:13.480 --> 11:21.400]  two other states but that wasn't okay let me make a comment that is perfect okay there's one skill
[11:21.400 --> 11:33.240]  you should develop beyond all other and I have I am an accomplished plagiarist don't write that suit
[11:33.240 --> 11:40.200]  get some high paid lawyer suit who's already written it and yeah you did that exactly right
[11:41.320 --> 11:47.480]  and these were lawyers these were lawyers and so they made theirs in they didn't get kicked out
[11:47.480 --> 11:52.360]  they didn't have any issue and so that's my claims and I'm I'm going to add to my claims what I got
[11:52.360 --> 11:57.800]  back from the judge and this is all I got I don't have any comments other than this you're filing
[11:57.800 --> 12:04.680]  your your form of offers is denied plaintiff is granted 28 days basically to pay and to file an
[12:04.680 --> 12:10.280]  amended complaint that adequately alleges the basis for this court's jurisdiction so I don't
[12:10.280 --> 12:15.640]  know if that means claims or just the fact that I need to bring the point that they have jurisdiction
[12:16.440 --> 12:21.320]  but it can't really be the claims because I copied some other lawyers who has been doing this
[12:21.320 --> 12:27.880]  okay well your lawyer was correct in addressing jurisdiction that's the most important thing
[12:30.200 --> 12:33.400]  are you familiar with a case called international shoe
[12:35.400 --> 12:44.040]  no international shoe look it up okay it is the seminal case on diversity jurisdiction
[12:44.040 --> 12:52.840]  you want to tell what diversity is where you have parties in different jurisdictions
[12:56.600 --> 13:03.000]  your diversity jurisdiction if you are in one state and you're suing someone in another state
[13:03.560 --> 13:11.560]  over a violation that that person committed in their state against their state laws
[13:11.560 --> 13:21.400]  that involved you you get diversity jurisdiction you're not in that state's jurisdiction so
[13:21.400 --> 13:28.280]  that state can't command you to come to their state and address an issue in their state
[13:29.640 --> 13:37.400]  unless there has been sufficient contacts within that state and international shoe
[13:37.400 --> 13:44.520]  is the seminal case that explains how diversity jurisdiction works and international shoe goes
[13:44.520 --> 13:51.800]  to minimum contacts how much contact do you have to have with that state in order to
[13:53.320 --> 14:01.080]  give that state jurisdiction over your case and that could be a problem in your case because you
[14:01.080 --> 14:08.920]  went to Illinois you had to have been within in the territory jurisdictions of Illinois
[14:08.920 --> 14:11.480]  to have your car improperly towed in Illinois
[14:14.280 --> 14:17.560]  so jurisdiction can be an issue
[14:20.680 --> 14:24.840]  well they're not saying that and and even everybody I've talked to including the lawyer
[14:24.840 --> 14:29.960]  that we were working that day he says okay you're a resident from another state the insurance
[14:29.960 --> 14:36.760]  company is a resident from Minnesota and the tow company is a resident from Illinois and all the
[14:36.760 --> 14:41.640]  all the actions happened Illinois says is absolutely diversity and he says all you
[14:41.640 --> 14:47.080]  need to say is that okay that doesn't okay I'm hearing that and I'm not convinced
[14:48.920 --> 14:54.920]  I'm the other side I'm going to say I have a towing company in Illinois I'm licensed in Illinois
[14:54.920 --> 15:02.600]  I towed a car in Illinois I didn't have anything to do I have an insurance company
[15:02.600 --> 15:08.920]  that's out of another state but the insurance company is not litigant the insurance company
[15:08.920 --> 15:21.960]  is indemnifying me so you came into my state and I towed your car in my state I should not be forced
[15:21.960 --> 15:31.560]  to go to a federal court based on diversity jurisdiction I should be able to to adjudicate
[15:31.560 --> 15:39.240]  this case based on the state law under which I am licensed how do you get around that well I've
[15:39.240 --> 15:46.040]  even looked at the class actions they get around diversity just for counties and so it's it clearly
[15:46.040 --> 15:53.480]  says in the rules of diversity resident so if I visited like I'm from another country which
[15:53.480 --> 16:00.120]  technically I am too I never told you guys that but my mom was from Canada so anyway
[16:01.560 --> 16:07.000]  diversity it says in the rules that the party's residents they're placed a resident so if I go
[16:07.000 --> 16:16.520]  to another country and I have an issue there okay residents is not does not necessarily preclude
[16:16.520 --> 16:26.840]  local jurisdiction you need to if the problem with residents is this occurred because you went
[16:26.840 --> 16:34.120]  to another jurisdiction you were in that jurisdiction when your car was towed and they're
[16:34.120 --> 16:40.040]  going to claim that just because you live somewhere else you were here in this jurisdiction so I have
[16:40.040 --> 16:45.560]  a right for the laws of this jurisdiction hang on Randy Felton Brett Felton leave our radio
[16:46.600 --> 16:54.760]  we'll be right back
[16:54.760 --> 17:04.760]  are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even losses
[17:05.400 --> 17:11.160]  stop debt collectors now with the michael miras proven method michael miras has won six cases in
[17:11.160 --> 17:16.440]  federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step by step instructions
[17:16.440 --> 17:21.720]  in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do when
[17:21.720 --> 17:27.240]  contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt
[17:27.240 --> 17:32.840]  collectors out of your credit reports how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[17:32.840 --> 17:38.680]  to go away the michael miras proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[17:38.680 --> 17:43.880]  personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio
[17:43.880 --> 17:51.800]  dot com and click on the blue michael miras banner or email michael miras at yahoo.com that's ruleoflawradio.com
[17:51.800 --> 17:59.720]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next
[18:01.800 --> 18:06.200]  rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america we live in
[18:06.200 --> 18:09.960]  an us against them society and if we the people are never going to have a free society then we're
[18:09.960 --> 18:14.360]  going to have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely
[18:14.360 --> 18:18.520]  from place to place right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due
[18:18.520 --> 18:23.320]  process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and
[18:23.320 --> 18:27.800]  preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy k craig in conjunction with rule
[18:27.800 --> 18:31.560]  of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[18:31.560 --> 18:35.640]  understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law you can get your
[18:35.640 --> 18:40.360]  own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[18:40.360 --> 18:44.440]  by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus
[18:44.440 --> 18:48.920]  the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and
[18:48.920 --> 18:52.600]  other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[18:52.600 --> 18:57.560]  for rule of law radio.com order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all
[18:57.560 --> 19:08.520]  want and deserve you are listening to the logos radio network logo radio network dot com
[19:12.680 --> 19:19.480]  well don't let nothing get to you only the father can't deliver you so don't let badmine people hurt
[19:19.480 --> 19:28.440]  you i guess it's i'm getting behind you know what i mean my friend and all i just showed you
[19:28.440 --> 19:44.040]  okay we are back ready to help brett fount blue law radio and we're talking to chris colorado
[19:44.040 --> 19:52.920]  and chris your station will be a problem they are not going to want to have to go to the federal
[19:52.920 --> 19:59.400]  court and argue this issue when i was on the break i was talking about this to brett say i've
[19:59.400 --> 20:06.520]  got a grocery store and i'm selling groceries and i'm licensed with the state of texas and i'm
[20:06.520 --> 20:13.640]  functioning under under state law and somebody comes in and buys something or somebody comes in
[20:13.640 --> 20:23.240]  and they slip and fall in my establishment and they sue me i should be able to rely on the state
[20:23.240 --> 20:28.920]  that i'm in because i'm in the state i'm dealing with people in the state i don't have anything to
[20:28.920 --> 20:36.360]  do with any people in other states they come in my state and come to me and a tort occurs and now
[20:36.360 --> 20:45.880]  they want me to have to go out to the fed to defend myself is that does that sound reasonable chris
[20:53.160 --> 21:01.080]  chris you there you got me muted no i'm muted do i i think i heard my hit my meat button my
[21:01.080 --> 21:07.640]  eye it doesn't make sense for any but i this is where we were i've been steered this whole
[21:07.640 --> 21:12.920]  direction my this whole year and right up before i the day before i was submitting the lawsuit the
[21:12.920 --> 21:17.400]  lawyer and i were talking about this is yeah that i mean here's a guy who's who's actually knows the
[21:17.400 --> 21:21.560]  court and knows the federal and was telling me he says it's called diversity of citizenship
[21:22.600 --> 21:27.240]  and so citizens of the state and citizens subject to foreign state and things like that and that's
[21:27.240 --> 21:31.880]  what i'm looking at here and he says that you if you're a resident of illinois you can't do them in
[21:31.880 --> 21:36.840]  federal court but if you're not a resident or if you're a citizen of another country and you're
[21:36.840 --> 21:43.160]  visiting this is the things we talked about so i'll dig deeper into that and find out i don't
[21:43.160 --> 21:49.000]  know that that's the actual reason the judge is so vague that i don't know what why he's saying any of
[21:49.000 --> 21:58.520]  this yeah that jurisdiction is is is a difficult issue and then and what i was doing was i took
[21:58.520 --> 22:03.320]  the other guy's side and i want to argue his position from a rational and reasonable perspective
[22:04.200 --> 22:10.600]  sure and the lawyer just saying that simply because you live in another state you necessarily have
[22:10.600 --> 22:17.960]  your diversity jurisdiction that is not true and international international shoe will address
[22:17.960 --> 22:27.800]  is that issue of diversity jurisdiction under minimum contacts and minimum contacts in this case
[22:27.800 --> 22:35.560]  goes to you came into the state voluntarily and you did business within the state and that's what
[22:35.560 --> 22:41.080]  minimum contacts goes to so look at that one you're sure to get that argument
[22:43.000 --> 22:46.920]  whatever jurisdiction you sue in they're likely to want to push you into another one
[22:46.920 --> 22:53.640]  on especially if they're state actors and you sue in the fed they're definitely going to want to
[22:53.640 --> 22:59.640]  push you back to the state because they feel like the state will be more favorable to a state
[22:59.640 --> 23:06.200]  citizen than it will be to a foreign citizen okay remember to please if you would the the
[23:06.200 --> 23:14.120]  insurance company they're in they're in um not wisconsin but minnesota irrelevant license license
[23:14.120 --> 23:20.840]  to do business in illinois yep but so yeah so they're if they're licensed to do business in
[23:20.840 --> 23:27.640]  illinois then they can be sued in illinois that won't get you and you don't have a claim against
[23:27.640 --> 23:34.840]  the insurance company anyway no i do i do we talked about that but i do okay that i that i need to
[23:34.840 --> 23:41.560]  see some case law on because the insurance company has a contract with the insured and the insurance
[23:41.560 --> 23:49.640]  company agrees to indemnify the insured so you're not in a contractual relationship with the insurance
[23:49.640 --> 23:56.840]  company they don't owe you anything if if you get a judgment against the accused then the insurance
[23:56.840 --> 24:03.640]  company the accused has to pay you the insurance company pays the accused i understand but they
[24:03.640 --> 24:09.160]  member they stepped in and i they actually on day two were the ones that acted on behalf of the
[24:09.160 --> 24:14.680]  tow company i have never spoken to the tow company after august 28 2018 it's always been to the
[24:14.680 --> 24:19.560]  insurance the insurance company has harbored them they have they have with health information
[24:19.560 --> 24:25.800]  that'll do it that'll do it they have minimum contacts yeah yeah once once they stepped in
[24:25.800 --> 24:32.360]  then they became a litigant and that will almost certainly get you uh diversity jurisdiction
[24:32.360 --> 24:40.680]  okay so how do i address the judge in far as is extracting just some guidance because i'm
[24:40.680 --> 24:44.520]  i know i'm defensive and that's just my life experience but it's like maybe he's trying
[24:44.520 --> 24:49.640]  to help me i don't feel he is that's my gut feeling okay but i'm i'm going to suggest
[24:49.640 --> 24:59.880]  whether he's trying to help you or not treat his pleadings his his advice to you as if he
[24:59.880 --> 25:10.520]  is trying to instruct you you will find it very valuable he's telling you this is what
[25:10.520 --> 25:20.600]  you have to give me so that i can rule in your favor okay whether he intends to or not you know
[25:20.600 --> 25:25.720]  he may be just be a jerk but he's telling you you're not giving me what i need
[25:25.720 --> 25:33.400]  and try to look at it from that perspective most of the times you will find that is exactly the
[25:33.400 --> 25:47.160]  case alivia are you there yep hello tell chris about your experience with the courts and them
[25:48.520 --> 25:54.680]  giving you advice on how to give them what they need but i actually got a document from
[25:54.680 --> 26:05.320]  me now i wanted to read it for you but um about the lawsuit uh in my case i just i wrote where the
[26:05.320 --> 26:14.360]  issues started from i have a good ability to assess information and see how things started
[26:14.360 --> 26:22.200]  and where it led to so me not understanding the proper way to write up a claim i wrote it up in
[26:22.200 --> 26:28.280]  that form you know gave gave him the specific so when the issue started and everything so
[26:29.320 --> 26:36.040]  in that because of that i did not follow the format properly so i was not saying the proper
[26:36.040 --> 26:42.920]  claim and everything but in my head i was doing the property but when he came down to it the
[26:43.480 --> 26:48.520]  first judge i guess he's an interim judge or i don't know what they call him but he said no i
[26:48.520 --> 26:54.120]  have a claim because this reason this reason that reason i talked to randy randy told him told me
[26:54.120 --> 27:02.280]  to be nice to him so i did i looked at what they said i like okay well these issues you know have
[27:02.280 --> 27:10.920]  have standing but i have i brought up my other issues that um i thought needed to be looked at
[27:10.920 --> 27:16.840]  or addressed even though because i'm not a professional you know i'm a pro safe individual
[27:16.840 --> 27:24.040]  trying to litigate my case so this is where i was trying to say but when he came down to it
[27:24.760 --> 27:32.360]  the judge who actually rules on the case uh wrote uh order of dismissal and this is how
[27:33.000 --> 27:39.320]  he wrote his dismissal when i first read the dismissal i was mad because you know what i
[27:39.320 --> 27:46.120]  knew that i tried as i did at best i could but i was so mad that i didn't read i was not able to
[27:46.120 --> 27:54.440]  look at the codes that was that the paper wasn't encoded with when i when i finally settled down
[27:54.440 --> 28:00.440]  two months later and re-looked at it i realized that he gave me everything i needed to properly
[28:00.440 --> 28:05.720]  put it in front of a properly put it in front of a court because it actually got removed
[28:05.720 --> 28:11.240]  from one jurisdiction to the jurisdiction in which i claimed the problem occurred so they
[28:11.240 --> 28:17.640]  can deny it properly so uh this is what he wrote he said the order of dismissal
[28:17.640 --> 28:23.480]  martin levier sued the state of florida he filed in the middle district of florida but the court
[28:23.480 --> 28:30.520]  transferred the case here the magistrate has recommended uh dismissal in response levier
[28:30.520 --> 28:37.080]  said that the magistrate recommends recommendations are well taken and correct he also sought to
[28:37.080 --> 28:44.280]  amend the gist of the original complaint was that the leon county court suspended
[28:44.280 --> 28:53.800]  levier's license in 2006 2010 that was my first mistake and but i was just explaining the story
[28:53.800 --> 29:02.440]  i didn't understand so and it it violated the constitution in doing so because the complaint
[29:02.440 --> 29:08.520]  came long after the four-year statute of limitation is expired the magistrate judge
[29:08.520 --> 29:16.520]  recommended dismissal for untimeliness this is the recommendation that levier says is correct
[29:17.720 --> 29:25.400]  and certainly to the extent levier seeks redress for those older actions and he does not and he
[29:25.400 --> 29:32.200]  does say he is asking the court to reverse its distinction and then state his license
[29:35.160 --> 29:39.080]  okay yeah hang on we're back to go to our sponsors randy kelton
[29:39.080 --> 29:44.440]  brett fouton rule by radio the thing i wanted you to pay most attention to is the judge actually
[29:44.440 --> 29:52.920]  remarked that levier accepted his ruling that will bring the judge way closer to your side hang on
[29:52.920 --> 30:04.760]  we'll be right back everyone knows that walking is great exercise but you might want to know that
[30:04.760 --> 30:09.720]  the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live i'm dr kathryn albrecht and i'll
[30:09.720 --> 30:16.520]  be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment privacy is under attack when you
[30:16.520 --> 30:21.880]  give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll
[30:21.880 --> 30:27.720]  find your freedoms will start to vanish too so protect your rights say no to surveillance and
[30:27.720 --> 30:33.800]  keep your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this public service announcement
[30:33.800 --> 30:38.600]  is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine alternative to google
[30:38.600 --> 30:46.360]  yahoo and bing start over with start page new research shows how fast you walk could predict
[30:46.360 --> 30:51.320]  how long you're going to live the journal of the american medical association reports that older
[30:51.320 --> 30:56.920]  adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected in case you're wondering
[30:56.920 --> 31:02.440]  one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour a senior's age gender and walking
[31:02.440 --> 31:07.800]  speed whereas good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures generally
[31:07.800 --> 31:13.320]  speaking faster walkers live longer measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive it only
[31:13.320 --> 31:18.360]  takes a stopwatch some space to walk in a few minutes researchers say it could help doctors
[31:18.360 --> 31:24.200]  identify older patients who need special care i'm dr catherine albrecht more news and information
[31:24.200 --> 31:33.880]  at catherine albrecht dot com i lost my son one nephew my uncle my son on september 11th
[31:33.880 --> 31:39.880]  2000 most people don't know that a third tower fell on september 11 world trade center seven a
[31:39.880 --> 31:45.880]  47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane although the official explanation is that fire brought down
[31:45.880 --> 31:51.320]  building seven over 1200 architects and engineers looked into the evidence and believed there is
[31:51.320 --> 31:58.120]  more to the story bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what dot org why it
[31:58.120 --> 32:04.680]  fell why it matters is what you can do logos radio network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the
[32:04.680 --> 32:11.960]  new year scripture talk with nano will begin wednesday january 8th from 8 to 10 p.m central time
[32:11.960 --> 32:18.120]  our goal is in accord with matthew 516 let your light so shine before men that they may see your
[32:18.120 --> 32:23.880]  good works and glorify your father which is in heaven we wish to reflect god's light and be a
[32:23.880 --> 32:30.120]  blessing to all those with a hearing ear join nana and guests for both verse by verse bible studies
[32:30.120 --> 32:36.440]  and topical bible studies designed to provoke onto love and good works our verse by verse bible
[32:36.440 --> 32:41.960]  studies will begin in the book of matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week our topical
[32:41.960 --> 32:47.400]  bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as christian character
[32:47.400 --> 32:54.040]  development so mark your calendar and join us live on logos radio network dot com wednesdays
[32:54.040 --> 33:00.120]  from 8 to 10 p.m starting january 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the scriptures
[33:00.120 --> 33:06.360]  live free speech radio logos radio network dot com
[33:30.120 --> 33:41.320]  uh
[34:00.120 --> 34:08.760]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Riddleball Radio, and we're talking to Chris
[34:08.760 --> 34:10.760]  in Colorado.
[34:10.760 --> 34:14.840]  Okay, where are we?
[34:14.840 --> 34:16.800]  Does that make sense on jurisdiction?
[34:16.800 --> 34:19.400]  You got to know the other side's going to fight you like a tiger.
[34:19.400 --> 34:27.120]  Oh, wait, wait, no, I'm sorry, we were talking to, to Olivier, I forgot where we were at.
[34:27.120 --> 34:28.120]  Okay, go ahead.
[34:28.120 --> 34:34.920]  The point I wanted to make from Olivier is, instead of fighting with the judge, he told
[34:34.920 --> 34:42.640]  the judge that his arguments were well taken, and the judge very clearly took that to heart
[34:42.640 --> 34:47.400]  because I have never seen a judge mention something like that before.
[34:47.400 --> 34:49.920]  And he appreciates that?
[34:49.920 --> 34:51.960]  That's what I got.
[34:51.960 --> 34:56.040]  He said that to Olivier, he said, telling him he appreciates the fact that he's not
[34:56.040 --> 35:05.240]  being antagonistic, and he recognizes that the judge is trying to find a fair adjudication.
[35:05.240 --> 35:12.800]  And it should not soften the judge's position toward him, but at the end of the day, he's
[35:12.800 --> 35:13.800]  human being.
[35:13.800 --> 35:15.800]  Does that make sense, Chris?
[35:15.800 --> 35:24.440]  Yeah, I mean, I want respect and I want things to glow, but when I get a big statement like
[35:24.440 --> 35:30.640]  this, my question is, Olivier, did you get a response where it was only after the case
[35:30.640 --> 35:34.720]  was dismissed that you got a response to know where it was directed to go?
[35:34.720 --> 35:41.280]  I got a response from the first free judge that they looked at it, and that's the one
[35:41.280 --> 35:45.160]  that kind of went back and forth with it, but because they were trying to transfer my
[35:45.160 --> 35:53.080]  case, and then once I got my head on right, it took random device, I replied with an amendment
[35:53.080 --> 36:00.760]  with an amended one, and now that file was going to go to the actual judge that was going
[36:00.760 --> 36:07.840]  to make the final ruling, so that the judge who made the final ruling, he's the one who
[36:07.840 --> 36:11.080]  clarified it a lot more than the first judge.
[36:11.080 --> 36:15.160]  The first judge just like, ah, an odysmist, whatever.
[36:15.160 --> 36:24.840]  He didn't really explain or he just denied it on a reason, and then I came back and argued
[36:24.840 --> 36:31.480]  and they sent me a letter back stating why and what up, why the issues were, and then
[36:31.480 --> 36:32.480]  I responded back.
[36:32.480 --> 36:33.480]  You know what I'm saying?
[36:33.480 --> 36:38.880]  So, it was a respond back and forth type thing, from the first judge until the final judge
[36:38.880 --> 36:39.880]  read it.
[36:39.880 --> 36:49.680]  Let me address that, for the most part the judges are busy, and they don't really have
[36:49.680 --> 36:52.680]  a dog in your hunt.
[36:52.680 --> 37:00.960]  What they want to do is find the best adjudication of the case, especially in the federal courts.
[37:00.960 --> 37:08.720]  In the federal court, an order is not enough, an order dismissing a case does not dismiss
[37:08.720 --> 37:10.520]  the case.
[37:10.520 --> 37:21.840]  There must be an order and a, what's it called, we're at finding the fact, I'll think of
[37:21.840 --> 37:30.240]  the name in a second, there's an order and there must be another document, it has a
[37:30.240 --> 37:34.920]  special name I think of in a second, but it's effectively finding the fact in conclusions
[37:34.920 --> 37:41.480]  at law, a judgment, it's a judgment, there must be an order and a judgment, the judgment
[37:41.480 --> 37:45.320]  is what Olivier was reading.
[37:45.320 --> 37:52.320]  This is the law, these are the facts that I addressed, this is the law I applied to
[37:52.320 --> 37:59.760]  those facts, the judge will tell you why he ruled, what he ruled, if he doesn't do that
[37:59.760 --> 38:09.160]  you don't know how to appeal, you don't know why, what he ruled or how he ruled, so in
[38:09.160 --> 38:16.240]  the Fed you must have both of them, in the states you generally have to ask for findings
[38:16.240 --> 38:24.760]  of fact and conclusions at law, but the states do it automatically, and it's a real good
[38:24.760 --> 38:31.800]  practice because the judge will literally say to you, this is what you must give me
[38:31.800 --> 38:36.760]  so I can rule for you, and I'll say to the guy on the other side, this is what you have
[38:36.760 --> 38:47.040]  to give me so I can rule for you, so read the documents careful and give them, you give
[38:47.040 --> 38:51.640]  them respect they'll give it back to you, okay, go ahead Olivier.
[38:51.640 --> 39:00.520]  I'm saying in this case the judge gave extra, he not only gave a judgment on why things
[39:00.520 --> 39:06.840]  were the way they're supposed to be, why the judge is correct, he also gave reasons
[39:06.840 --> 39:18.960]  why I was correct and how to rewrite it, he's literally like if I finish reading the rest
[39:18.960 --> 39:25.800]  you will realize he just told me how to rewrite it, and all the issues, he was saying no this
[39:25.800 --> 39:32.600]  is not a claim, but within his responses or his argument I see that he's pulling these
[39:32.600 --> 39:40.280]  violations, these fact, this happened, he said like this is an issue, but underneath
[39:40.280 --> 39:43.000]  this format it's not a claim.
[39:43.000 --> 39:54.640]  Okay, point is Chris, if you're when you're in the feds, it's not directly confrontational
[39:54.640 --> 40:00.360]  especially between you and the judge, most of us guys in legal reform were always in
[40:00.360 --> 40:07.600]  fight mode, when you get in the federal courts it's much more sophisticated and they're
[40:07.600 --> 40:14.640]  not in fight mode, they really are trying to find the correct adjudication, okay, maybe
[40:14.640 --> 40:23.360]  they're not, but they have to give the impression that they are, and if you treat them as if
[40:23.360 --> 40:30.320]  they are you will get a much better adjudication, and here was your case, I do see a fight over
[40:30.320 --> 40:32.880]  jurisdiction.
[40:32.880 --> 40:37.120]  Can I ask for clarification because I'm not even getting anything, I'm just getting
[40:37.120 --> 40:40.240]  your suit because I don't like it.
[40:40.240 --> 40:47.280]  If you didn't get a judgment, you don't have a ruling, so you can, and that is exactly
[40:47.280 --> 40:49.880]  the right thing to ask for is clarification.
[40:49.880 --> 40:57.400]  Okay, I have a case number, but that's it, and he's giving me 28 days to fix something
[40:57.400 --> 41:01.920]  that I have no idea what he wants fixed, so I'm just absolutely fine, I'm motion for
[41:01.920 --> 41:10.960]  clarification, treat the judge with respect, and he'll do the same thing to human nature
[41:10.960 --> 41:14.840]  that can't help it, you know, when Olivier told me what he got from the judge, I was
[41:14.840 --> 41:25.440]  just thrilled that they appreciate the fact, especially from a procé, most procés they
[41:25.440 --> 41:34.720]  get are just in fight mode, and waving the flag and threatening them on every turn, they
[41:34.720 --> 41:43.000]  get someone that treats them with respect, that's unusual for them, so look at what the
[41:43.000 --> 41:48.080]  judge tells you, if he didn't tell you anything, ask him for clarification, he will almost
[41:48.080 --> 41:52.440]  certainly give it to you, if he doesn't, then you have a different problem.
[41:52.440 --> 42:01.040]  Okay, and then I'll find out my answer, okay, all right, I'll do that this week.
[42:01.040 --> 42:02.760]  Say that last part again.
[42:02.760 --> 42:06.920]  I will do that this week, I will ask for clarification and then we'll find out what type of judge
[42:06.920 --> 42:07.920]  I have.
[42:07.920 --> 42:14.200]  Good, wonderful, and if you have a judge that's a real stinker, I'll give you this
[42:14.200 --> 42:21.960]  kind of complaint against him, burn him good, and then the way he handles that is he shits
[42:21.960 --> 42:27.520]  gears and starts treating you with the respect you had a right to in the first place.
[42:27.520 --> 42:34.280]  Okay, all right, well I got 28 days as of today, so that should be enough time, but
[42:34.280 --> 42:39.360]  man, did I beat myself up, Randy, I got it in on the last day, but it was sufficient
[42:39.360 --> 42:43.120]  enough, so I beat the statute of limitations, but that's what I'm dealing with now, if
[42:43.120 --> 42:47.560]  he dismisses it, how does that deal with statute of limitations after that?
[42:47.560 --> 42:54.040]  You've already made this statute, once you get something in, my first foreclosure case,
[42:54.040 --> 43:00.120]  a fellow broadcaster came to me, I got an eviction hearing in two days, I need a lawsuit, I said
[43:00.120 --> 43:03.920]  I'm still doing my research, I don't have time for research, I need a lawsuit, so I
[43:03.920 --> 43:08.200]  went on the internet and pulled down a bunch of junk, stuck it in a suit, gave it to him,
[43:08.200 --> 43:14.160]  he filed it, we made a claim against the title, because that's what would take away to JP's
[43:14.160 --> 43:18.280]  jurisdiction, they take it into court, the JP looks at it, this is the claim against
[43:18.280 --> 43:24.480]  the title, what are you doing in my court, get out of my court, 30 days later the opposing
[43:24.480 --> 43:30.960]  side filed a response that said, you're out of this case, this is a piece of crap, 45
[43:30.960 --> 43:37.080]  days later the judge responded, you're right, this is a piece of crap, fix it, three times
[43:37.080 --> 43:43.760]  through the routine, the third one's stuck, you get something in, if it's a piece of crap,
[43:43.760 --> 43:50.280]  doesn't matter, get it in, once it's in, statute of limitations is fixed, now you can move
[43:50.280 --> 44:00.760]  ahead, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we will radio, we'll be right back.
[44:00.760 --> 44:06.800]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition,
[44:06.800 --> 44:11.520]  people feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that,
[44:11.520 --> 44:17.200]  our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition,
[44:17.200 --> 44:22.600]  in a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.600 --> 44:28.120]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need, Logos Radio Network gets many requests to
[44:28.120 --> 44:33.640]  endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject, we have come to trust Jevity so
[44:33.640 --> 44:39.880]  much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others,
[44:39.880 --> 44:46.200]  when you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:46.200 --> 44:53.280]  quality radio, as you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us, as a distributor,
[44:53.280 --> 44:59.080]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income,
[44:59.080 --> 45:00.080]  order now.
[45:00.080 --> 45:04.480]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.480 --> 45:11.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.240 --> 45:17.920]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step, if you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[45:17.920 --> 45:23.680]  should be doing, if you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself, thousands
[45:23.680 --> 45:29.680]  have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too, Jurisdictionary was created
[45:29.680 --> 45:36.720]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience, even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[45:36.720 --> 45:41.720]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[45:41.720 --> 45:43.720]  our American courts.
[45:43.720 --> 45:49.800]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.800 --> 45:52.360]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.360 --> 45:59.360]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-V.
[46:22.360 --> 46:45.360]  I have homework to do, I just wanted to make sure, so I have a mental thing going, if my
[46:45.360 --> 46:55.000]  statute of limitations was done Tuesday, and I made it, but if my case is dismissed, you
[46:55.000 --> 46:58.080]  made the statute of limitations.
[46:58.080 --> 47:03.080]  If they dismissed with or without prejudice, doesn't matter, because you can continue to
[47:03.080 --> 47:11.400]  adjudicate the case, you just have to get a pleading in before the deadline, and you
[47:11.400 --> 47:13.400]  raise the flag.
[47:13.400 --> 47:19.960]  All right, well, I should be able to figure this out before, in 28 days, I will do my
[47:19.960 --> 47:20.960]  homework.
[47:20.960 --> 47:24.240]  I'm usually pretty good at that, but I just wanted to see if I had a crappy judge, and
[47:24.240 --> 47:27.760]  you finally gave me an answer, I wanted Randy, but you also gave me a lot of common sense
[47:27.760 --> 47:28.760]  to go off of.
[47:28.760 --> 47:32.320]  I need to treat people of respect and not assume everybody's after me, and we'll see
[47:32.320 --> 47:33.320]  you.
[47:33.320 --> 47:42.440]  I just went into Johnson County, and several years ago, I hammered Jim big time, but not
[47:42.440 --> 47:47.680]  one person in Johnson County ever heard me raise my voice.
[47:47.680 --> 47:53.680]  Not one person ever heard me speak harshly to anyone.
[47:53.680 --> 47:55.880]  I laugh and joke with them.
[47:55.880 --> 48:00.880]  I saw David Lloyd, the district clerk in the courthouse, I said, hello, David, how's it
[48:00.880 --> 48:01.880]  going?
[48:01.880 --> 48:05.680]  Hello, Mr. Kelton, you're going to try to get me arrested again today?
[48:05.680 --> 48:07.880]  Oh, that, David, heck.
[48:07.880 --> 48:11.160]  I was just joking, wasn't that a hoot?
[48:11.160 --> 48:18.520]  I called 911, asked him to come out and arrest him, the day before, because he tried to charge
[48:18.520 --> 48:20.280]  me for a habeas corpus.
[48:20.280 --> 48:27.560]  He said, that'll be a $241 fine fee, way right there, David, don't go anywhere, somebody's
[48:27.560 --> 48:32.600]  going to want to talk to you, and I flipped my phone out, called 911.
[48:32.600 --> 48:37.560]  About 20 minutes, the cops showed up, the old fat guy walks in the back door and said,
[48:37.560 --> 48:39.680]  what seemed to me the problem here?
[48:39.680 --> 48:43.200]  And I said, the problem is, you don't have pencil and paper.
[48:43.200 --> 48:47.080]  Well, why do I need pencil and paper?
[48:47.080 --> 48:49.880]  Take my criminal complaint against the district judge standing here.
[48:49.880 --> 48:55.200]  Well, why would I take a criminal complaint against the district judge?
[48:55.200 --> 49:00.280]  Because he's a criminal, that's why.
[49:00.280 --> 49:05.480]  He went down the hills from there, but to David's credit, he stood there and didn't
[49:05.480 --> 49:07.760]  untrack a foot.
[49:07.760 --> 49:15.280]  So they finally, I finally let it drop after I harassed him for a while, and I come back
[49:15.280 --> 49:21.920]  the next day and David's not happy, but I'm laughing and joking with him.
[49:21.920 --> 49:26.560]  How do you deal with a guy like that?
[49:26.560 --> 49:35.480]  Never let them, they want to be able to say that you are agitated.
[49:35.480 --> 49:43.720]  That's why when he told me a $241 filing fee, I didn't quote him 11.151, Texas Court of
[49:43.720 --> 49:51.840]  Criminal Procedure that says there shall be no fee for a writ of habeas corpus.
[49:51.840 --> 49:59.680]  I could have told him that, but if I had, he would construe me as being argumentative
[49:59.680 --> 50:04.600]  and call me agitated.
[50:04.600 --> 50:09.920]  Never give fair warning, never give legal advice.
[50:09.920 --> 50:13.120]  Never tell them, oh, if you do that, I'll call 911.
[50:13.120 --> 50:19.280]  Just call 911, then you've got their attention.
[50:19.280 --> 50:26.520]  So always treat them with dignity and respect, even when you're trying to give them arrested.
[50:26.520 --> 50:30.240]  They don't know how to handle you when you do that, so absolutely.
[50:30.240 --> 50:36.360]  And especially judges, judges, they don't have time to single you out for special persecution.
[50:36.360 --> 50:41.840]  They're just too busy and they always get paid.
[50:41.840 --> 50:49.520]  If you're a good judge, neither part is going to be happy as a rule.
[50:49.520 --> 50:54.440]  So you're going to rule what's right and without regard to the people involved.
[50:54.440 --> 50:58.680]  And most of the time, nobody gets everything they wanted.
[50:58.680 --> 51:06.040]  So when someone tells a judge they appreciate their criticism as well taken, like Olivier,
[51:06.040 --> 51:07.560]  that goes a long way.
[51:07.560 --> 51:09.520]  Okay, I'll shut up now.
[51:09.520 --> 51:10.520]  I'll quit preaching.
[51:10.520 --> 51:15.200]  Okay, I'll do that and I'll get on my next task here.
[51:15.200 --> 51:16.200]  Thank you very much.
[51:16.200 --> 51:17.200]  Okay.
[51:17.200 --> 51:18.200]  Thank you, Chris.
[51:18.200 --> 51:19.200]  Okay.
[51:19.200 --> 51:21.200]  Now we're going to go to Scott in Michigan.
[51:21.200 --> 51:22.200]  Hello, Scott.
[51:22.200 --> 51:23.200]  Hey.
[51:23.200 --> 51:24.200]  Hello.
[51:24.200 --> 51:25.200]  How's it going?
[51:25.200 --> 51:27.440]  It's going good.
[51:27.440 --> 51:30.240]  What do you have for us today?
[51:30.240 --> 51:32.520]  I respectfully yield my time to Olivier.
[51:32.520 --> 51:36.400]  I want to hear him first and maybe ask him some questions.
[51:36.400 --> 51:37.400]  That'll work.
[51:37.400 --> 51:38.400]  Okay.
[51:38.400 --> 51:40.520]  I'll leave you unmuted.
[51:40.520 --> 51:43.920]  So if you have a question or a comment, Olivier?
[51:43.920 --> 51:46.520]  Yeah, I'm here.
[51:46.520 --> 51:47.520]  Okay.
[51:47.520 --> 51:55.840]  Now you have to understand that Scott is in Michigan, so he's a Yankee and he doesn't
[51:55.840 --> 51:57.640]  speak hillbilly.
[51:57.640 --> 51:58.640]  Okay.
[51:58.640 --> 52:03.680]  So it says that the claims are too late.
[52:03.680 --> 52:10.680]  It says, so I, like Olivier, agree with the magistrate judge that the original complaint
[52:10.680 --> 52:11.680]  cannot succeed.
[52:11.680 --> 52:15.600]  You know, there was a time bar and I wrote it in 2006.
[52:15.600 --> 52:19.080]  The incident happened in 2006 and 2010.
[52:19.080 --> 52:25.800]  It says, but Olivier has filed an amended complaint trying to clear it up, but he did
[52:25.800 --> 52:29.240]  it before any response to the first complaint.
[52:29.240 --> 52:32.240]  He did it as a matter of rights.
[52:32.240 --> 52:36.200]  Then it says that to, I have, let me explain that.
[52:36.200 --> 52:40.760]  When you file a complaint, and that's why I say, get something in, make sure you get
[52:40.760 --> 52:48.040]  in in time, doesn't matter if it's piece of crap, because you have one amended complaint
[52:48.040 --> 52:52.360]  that you can file as a matter of rights.
[52:52.360 --> 52:58.160]  After that, you have to ask the court for permission to file an amended complaint.
[52:58.160 --> 53:04.840]  And when you do that, you send the judge the amended complaint and ask the judge for permission
[53:04.840 --> 53:06.920]  to file it.
[53:06.920 --> 53:13.840]  So he can look at the complaint and determine whether or not it's worth the court's time.
[53:13.840 --> 53:15.920]  And he will approve or not approve.
[53:15.920 --> 53:20.360]  Now you can file as many amended as you want to, so long as the court's approved, but you
[53:20.360 --> 53:23.240]  got one as a matter of right.
[53:23.240 --> 53:24.240]  I'm sorry.
[53:24.240 --> 53:25.240]  Go ahead, Olivier.
[53:25.240 --> 53:31.120]  They said, I have therefore considered the amended complaint, too.
[53:31.120 --> 53:40.800]  He said, read charitably, his new complaint alleges ongoing problems, not just problems
[53:40.800 --> 53:44.800]  from 2006 or 2010.
[53:44.800 --> 53:51.960]  He suggests that certain Florida statutes are vague and are allowing unconstitutional
[53:51.960 --> 53:54.880]  prosecutions.
[53:54.880 --> 54:06.720]  And in his response to the report and recommendation, he alleges he was unlawfully arrested again
[54:06.720 --> 54:19.000]  for statute 33246, the suspended license statute, while he was using his automobile as a normal
[54:19.000 --> 54:22.480]  mode of locomotion.
[54:22.480 --> 54:33.760]  And he put in parentheses is, he and his, it may not stand out like he's relating that
[54:33.760 --> 54:36.840]  he understands exactly what I'm arguing.
[54:36.840 --> 54:47.120]  It says that, so it is at least possible that part of his claim is not time barred.
[54:47.120 --> 54:53.120]  Nevertheless, the amended complaint fails to state a claim.
[54:53.120 --> 55:01.200]  For one thing, as a matter of law, the challenged provisions are not impermissible, impermissibly
[55:01.200 --> 55:06.480]  vague in all applications, then it gives me case law, which is that they're correct.
[55:06.480 --> 55:11.280]  I was just upset and I wanted them to do work, but now I understand that's not how I should
[55:11.280 --> 55:12.280]  do it.
[55:12.280 --> 55:21.440]  It says a statute is spatially vague in violation of due process only when the law is impermissibly
[55:21.440 --> 55:25.880]  vague in all of its applications.
[55:25.880 --> 55:32.440]  So, to the extent he brings a facial challenge, it fails.
[55:32.440 --> 55:37.440]  So, this is the judge telling me how to write my next lawsuit.
[55:37.440 --> 55:43.120]  He's telling me that I have something that's not time barred, but because they're not,
[55:43.120 --> 55:49.000]  they don't have the will, they don't have the right to read it any, read my complaint
[55:49.000 --> 55:54.200]  any type of way and just give me the ruling, he sees what the argument that I'm trying
[55:54.200 --> 55:57.840]  to make, but I didn't write it correctly.
[55:57.840 --> 56:04.440]  Then he says that, in my argument, I brought up a facial challenge also.
[56:04.440 --> 56:07.920]  I brought up three different, three or four different categories.
[56:07.920 --> 56:09.920]  One of them was facial challenge.
[56:09.920 --> 56:15.000]  Right here, he's telling me, he's given me the law that a facial challenge will not
[56:15.000 --> 56:22.440]  get me into the court, but he did not bring up the other three, which the other three
[56:22.440 --> 56:25.640]  are dead on point.
[56:25.640 --> 56:35.360]  He said, and any hidden as applied challenges fails too, because he alleges no facts to
[56:35.360 --> 56:41.560]  show how the statute was applied to him.
[56:41.560 --> 56:51.040]  That's another key to get into the court, and he's showing me, he's like, I understand
[56:51.040 --> 56:57.280]  what you're saying, but you have to put this in perspective, so you can get into the court.
[56:57.280 --> 57:06.120]  Plus, he has not alleged that defendant Ashley Moody, Florida State, Florida Attorney General,
[57:06.120 --> 57:19.680]  is responsible for enforcing the challenge statute, and his 1983 complaint cannot succeed
[57:19.680 --> 57:27.320]  against the other defendant, the state, because it is not a person for the purpose of the
[57:27.320 --> 57:28.320]  statute.
[57:28.320 --> 57:36.360]  For all of the reasons, I agree that dismissal is appropriate, and because all of us have
[57:36.360 --> 57:44.000]  already admitted once, and because it appears no further amendment would help, the dismissal
[57:44.000 --> 57:47.200]  is without leave to amend.
[57:47.200 --> 57:52.480]  It makes sense, like, I can't even get mad at it, because he wrote my lawsuit for me,
[57:52.480 --> 57:57.800]  like, listen, all this is wrong, but this is the issue that you want to bring up, and
[57:57.800 --> 58:01.240]  this is how you should bring it up.
[58:01.240 --> 58:12.880]  So now when you follow the next lawsuit, you will be better prepared, and this is wonderful.
[58:12.880 --> 58:18.600]  Women should read pleadings this way, especially in the Fed.
[58:18.600 --> 58:23.880]  It's not so much so in the state, but in the Fed, they're generally pretty good about this.
[58:23.880 --> 58:32.880]  Hang on, Scott, hang on, Olivier, if I don't choke on the break, we'll be right back.
[58:32.880 --> 58:33.880]  Okay.
[58:33.880 --> 58:41.880]  Breathe, then swallow, don't swallow and breathe, we'll be right back.
[58:41.880 --> 58:54.560]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.560 --> 58:59.760]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.760 --> 59:00.760]  can really help.
[59:00.760 --> 59:05.520]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.520 --> 59:06.520]  today.
[59:06.520 --> 59:10.440]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.440 --> 59:13.560]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.560 --> 59:18.800]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.800 --> 59:23.080]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:23.080 --> 59:28.000]  of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.000 --> 59:45.800]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[59:45.800 --> 59:48.800]  us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.800 --> 01:00:00.800]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:06.880]  The following is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.880 --> 01:00:12.760]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July, 2019, open with precious metals, gold at $1,429
[01:00:12.760 --> 01:00:21.200]  an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:21.200 --> 01:00:29.400]  brand crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.400 --> 01:00:41.160]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash $324.10, a crypto
[01:00:41.160 --> 01:00:42.160]  coin.
[01:00:42.160 --> 01:00:52.560]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.560 --> 01:00:57.880]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[01:00:57.880 --> 01:01:04.880]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:01:04.880 --> 01:01:09.920]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEPA to tax
[01:01:09.920 --> 01:01:14.520]  his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San
[01:01:14.520 --> 01:01:18.960]  Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:01:18.960 --> 01:01:22.920]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:01:22.920 --> 01:01:24.840]  test the herb for THC.
[01:01:24.840 --> 01:01:28.560]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that
[01:01:28.560 --> 01:01:33.200]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:01:33.200 --> 01:01:34.200]  law.
[01:01:34.200 --> 01:01:37.720]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:01:37.720 --> 01:01:42.200]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.200 --> 01:01:48.360]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB1325 works, as
[01:01:48.360 --> 01:01:51.320]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney.
[01:01:51.320 --> 01:01:57.360]  In El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law quote
[01:01:57.360 --> 01:02:01.840]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.840 --> 01:02:06.800]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.800 --> 01:02:11.280]  in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[01:02:11.280 --> 01:02:13.560]  illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.560 --> 01:02:17.440]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[01:02:17.440 --> 01:02:22.680]  charged with.
[01:02:22.680 --> 01:02:27.320]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark
[01:02:27.320 --> 01:02:32.440]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[01:02:32.440 --> 01:02:38.080]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[01:02:38.080 --> 01:02:39.080]  Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.080 --> 01:02:43.880]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near
[01:02:43.880 --> 01:02:50.120]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[01:02:50.120 --> 01:02:51.120]  glow.
[01:02:51.120 --> 01:03:01.120]  This was Rook Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:01.120 --> 01:03:22.060]  Thank you and I'm glad you enjoyed the video.
[01:03:31.120 --> 01:03:44.680]  Okay, we are back to Randy Kelton, Brad Fountain, Rueva Radio, and we're talking to Scott and
[01:03:44.680 --> 01:03:45.680]  Olivier.
[01:03:45.680 --> 01:03:49.640]  Scott, did you have any questions for Olivier?
[01:03:49.640 --> 01:03:53.040]  Well, the Voice for Vagamist thing is fascinating.
[01:03:53.040 --> 01:04:00.080]  You know, I think there's infinite applications for that because so many statutes and the
[01:04:00.080 --> 01:04:05.880]  proliferation of so many statutes means that the possibility for them to be unclear is
[01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:06.880]  definitely out there.
[01:04:06.880 --> 01:04:11.440]  So, I think there's a lot of places to go, a lot of directions to go with that.
[01:04:11.440 --> 01:04:18.040]  Yeah, and going to this point, I want to speak to Promissaria Staple.
[01:04:18.040 --> 01:04:23.680]  Olivier promised to send me some case law on this, and he never did.
[01:04:23.680 --> 01:04:27.400]  I got to read it for you.
[01:04:27.400 --> 01:04:28.400]  Okay.
[01:04:28.400 --> 01:04:34.000]  So, I'm going to sue him for Promissaria Staple.
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:43.920]  And what Scott said was correct, and that's why I tend to look at the bigger picture of
[01:04:43.920 --> 01:04:49.120]  things, and that's one of the things I wanted to ask and talk to you about, too, the fact
[01:04:49.120 --> 01:04:56.320]  that this vehicle has so many ways, so many ways that we can use it, and I just heard
[01:04:56.320 --> 01:05:02.560]  about it, and I just learned about it, and I'm 38, so I'm like, how did we get here?
[01:05:02.560 --> 01:05:08.240]  I'm like, this is how we got here, we allowed them to take over our schools and educate
[01:05:08.240 --> 01:05:13.720]  us to the point where the words that we're speaking don't even represent or not even
[01:05:13.720 --> 01:05:21.320]  represented in the courtroom, you know, like there's a big diversion that happened, and
[01:05:21.320 --> 01:05:23.760]  we missed out, we don't understand it.
[01:05:23.760 --> 01:05:31.360]  So, now that I see and understand how they've got there, now how do I explain to people
[01:05:31.360 --> 01:05:36.240]  not to bring your children to the public schools?
[01:05:36.240 --> 01:05:41.560]  Because that's what it comes down to, the public schooling is what put us to sleep,
[01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:45.280]  because this vehicle has been out here forever.
[01:05:45.280 --> 01:05:56.480]  Well, you know, I have a niece who is a teacher, and you should see the look on her face when
[01:05:56.480 --> 01:06:03.920]  she speaks about her children, her students, and the things she does with them.
[01:06:03.920 --> 01:06:11.680]  She is absolutely, it's just incredible to watch her.
[01:06:11.680 --> 01:06:18.880]  She loves what she does, and everything she does is for the benefit of her children.
[01:06:18.880 --> 01:06:28.320]  The teachers are stuck within a system that's operated by professional bureaucrats.
[01:06:28.320 --> 01:06:31.080]  The teachers are not a problem.
[01:06:31.080 --> 01:06:35.760]  What they teach, they're prescribed to teach, we need to go after the bureaucrats.
[01:06:35.760 --> 01:06:42.360]  Well, okay, I understand that, but I'm not blaming the teachers, because I understand
[01:06:42.360 --> 01:06:45.440]  that you work for somebody and you're pressured to do something.
[01:06:45.440 --> 01:06:49.000]  My thing is, let's get straight to the problem.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:53.120]  The parent, your mom and dad, you're the problem.
[01:06:53.120 --> 01:06:59.200]  You're allowing, you're relinquishing your power and bringing your child to a public
[01:06:59.200 --> 01:07:09.000]  system that I can show you is putting you to sleep, to take your power and your rights
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  away.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:12.560]  Well, I have a suggestion.
[01:07:12.560 --> 01:07:19.040]  I addressed this a number of years ago, and I plan to get back to it, but I had other
[01:07:19.040 --> 01:07:21.440]  things intervene.
[01:07:21.440 --> 01:07:29.120]  We put our children through 12 years of government mandated school system, and we're in Texas
[01:07:29.120 --> 01:07:36.960]  and Ross Perot a number of years ago pushed through an education reform bill.
[01:07:36.960 --> 01:07:43.040]  The stated reason for that was to eliminate social promotions.
[01:07:43.040 --> 01:07:49.040]  If you're a good football or basketball player, you'll get promoted whether you warrant it
[01:07:49.040 --> 01:07:54.680]  or not, and that became a real big issue, and they pushed you the education reform
[01:07:54.680 --> 01:07:55.680]  bill.
[01:07:55.680 --> 01:08:02.040]  Well, social promotions, it says there shall be no social promotions, but that was the
[01:08:02.040 --> 01:08:04.040]  second half.
[01:08:04.040 --> 01:08:11.760]  The first half stated, the school shall instill in the child a deep and abiding faith in and
[01:08:11.760 --> 01:08:14.800]  respect for the American form of government.
[01:08:14.800 --> 01:08:19.680]  So when our children go to school, they tell us what a great country this is and how it's
[01:08:19.680 --> 01:08:27.040]  a country of laws and how we have all these wonderful and alienable rights.
[01:08:27.040 --> 01:08:34.480]  However, while you're in this school, don't even think of trying to express one of those
[01:08:34.480 --> 01:08:41.240]  rights or the whole weight of the system will land right square on your head.
[01:08:41.240 --> 01:08:48.280]  We put our children through 12 years of that hypocrisy, and then we expect them to graduate
[01:08:48.280 --> 01:08:54.360]  and go out into the real world and magically become empowered citizens.
[01:08:54.360 --> 01:08:55.360]  Doesn't happen.
[01:08:55.360 --> 01:08:57.960]  They're following their training.
[01:08:57.960 --> 01:09:08.640]  What I suggest is that we propose and present legislation to separate the school counselor
[01:09:08.640 --> 01:09:15.680]  from the school system and designate the counselor as an ombudsman.
[01:09:15.680 --> 01:09:24.560]  So when the sixth grader gets sent to the principal, the first stop is the ombudsman.
[01:09:24.560 --> 01:09:33.120]  And when he goes to the principal, the ombudsman goes with him or her as their advocate.
[01:09:33.120 --> 01:09:40.400]  I'm not here in the real world, and if the system comes after me, I have a right to counsel.
[01:09:40.400 --> 01:09:46.760]  I'm going to suggest that my children have an equal right to counsel.
[01:09:46.760 --> 01:09:54.480]  And an ombudsman is well established in law that the ombudsman is a representative of
[01:09:54.480 --> 01:10:04.800]  the people before government or like the electric company, a highly regulated company must have
[01:10:04.800 --> 01:10:05.800]  an ombudsman.
[01:10:05.800 --> 01:10:10.240]  The electric company is huge and complex.
[01:10:10.240 --> 01:10:12.400]  I don't know all the ins and outs.
[01:10:12.400 --> 01:10:17.040]  So they must, since they're highly regulated by the government, they must provide an ombudsman
[01:10:17.040 --> 01:10:21.440]  that goes in as your representative.
[01:10:21.440 --> 01:10:26.120]  This would go a long ways to fix the problem that you're concerned with Olivier.
[01:10:26.120 --> 01:10:28.120]  What do you think?
[01:10:28.120 --> 01:10:29.120]  Right.
[01:10:29.120 --> 01:10:30.120]  Yeah.
[01:10:30.120 --> 01:10:35.640]  That's a good, that's a good, that's a vehicle.
[01:10:35.640 --> 01:10:44.160]  But the best vehicle is for the parents to take their power back, raise your child.
[01:10:44.160 --> 01:10:50.440]  I mean, our forefathers, when they came here and wrote the constitution and left that slave
[01:10:50.440 --> 01:10:56.600]  plantation, they knew that they had to teach that to their children.
[01:10:56.600 --> 01:11:03.320]  They didn't go, required no public schooling, which they knew was ran by the same people
[01:11:03.320 --> 01:11:06.320]  that they're running from.
[01:11:06.320 --> 01:11:11.320]  We don't understand that we're in a war, we're in a war with these people that just,
[01:11:11.320 --> 01:11:12.880]  it has not ended.
[01:11:12.880 --> 01:11:13.880]  Go look at history.
[01:11:13.880 --> 01:11:17.880]  It didn't just stop and take a break and we don't understand that.
[01:11:17.880 --> 01:11:21.520]  We're in a war for the minds of our children.
[01:11:21.520 --> 01:11:22.520]  Exactly.
[01:11:22.520 --> 01:11:29.640]  They put us to sleep and they don't have us by chains, but that dollar bill, that control,
[01:11:29.640 --> 01:11:30.640]  they got that.
[01:11:30.640 --> 01:11:35.760]  And they got control over the court because we don't even know the proper language.
[01:11:35.760 --> 01:11:41.000]  We, you know how many people get shocked and almost had a heart attack when I showed them
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:44.080]  the black legislationary?
[01:11:44.080 --> 01:11:47.880]  Just that part alone, they're like, wait a minute, we're not speaking the same language
[01:11:47.880 --> 01:11:48.880]  when we go to court?
[01:11:48.880 --> 01:11:49.880]  Like, no.
[01:11:49.880 --> 01:11:50.880]  Well, what do you mean?
[01:11:50.880 --> 01:11:51.880]  I can't take, what?
[01:11:51.880 --> 01:11:52.880]  No, you can't take that dictionary in the court.
[01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:53.880]  You're going to lose.
[01:11:53.880 --> 01:11:54.880]  What?
[01:11:54.880 --> 01:11:55.880]  That's not fair.
[01:11:55.880 --> 01:11:56.880]  That's not right.
[01:11:56.880 --> 01:11:57.880]  Well, it's been like that forever.
[01:11:57.880 --> 01:12:01.280]  You took your child and said, we take our children to school.
[01:12:01.280 --> 01:12:03.160]  I just learned about this dictionary too.
[01:12:03.160 --> 01:12:05.840]  I'm peed off too, but this is the reality.
[01:12:05.840 --> 01:12:09.560]  We need to stop it.
[01:12:09.560 --> 01:12:19.400]  I've been, I've been the show for 15 years trying to do exactly what you're saying.
[01:12:19.400 --> 01:12:23.360]  I wish there were a easy prescription.
[01:12:23.360 --> 01:12:31.120]  One thing to understand is that most people are so busy, they got so many claims on their
[01:12:31.120 --> 01:12:37.760]  time and their focus, they just don't have time to fight this battle.
[01:12:37.760 --> 01:12:39.240]  I'm an older guy.
[01:12:39.240 --> 01:12:40.400]  My house is paid for.
[01:12:40.400 --> 01:12:42.120]  My car is paid for.
[01:12:42.120 --> 01:12:44.160]  My children are grown.
[01:12:44.160 --> 01:12:46.520]  My grandchildren are grown.
[01:12:46.520 --> 01:12:50.520]  I have fulfilled my contract with life.
[01:12:50.520 --> 01:12:55.440]  I can go out here and do this because nobody's depending, depending on me, but when you got
[01:12:55.440 --> 01:13:04.200]  someone who's got two car payments, a mortgage, three kids, two jobs, all he can do is keep
[01:13:04.200 --> 01:13:06.320]  putting fires out.
[01:13:06.320 --> 01:13:12.480]  It's really difficult to ask him to step outside of his incredibly busy world and take
[01:13:12.480 --> 01:13:14.920]  on the system.
[01:13:14.920 --> 01:13:23.320]  But then again, the revolution was won by 3% of the population.
[01:13:23.320 --> 01:13:31.040]  We only need 3% and what you're doing on the VA is exactly what you need to be doing.
[01:13:31.040 --> 01:13:36.000]  You're taking these guys on, you're coming on this show and you're talking to other people,
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:40.240]  telling them how to do what you're doing.
[01:13:40.240 --> 01:13:47.280]  We do our jobs right now, if ever there was a time in our history that the public is awake,
[01:13:47.280 --> 01:13:50.360]  it's awake right now.
[01:13:50.360 --> 01:13:59.600]  I believe I was put here to be at this place at this time to help create more people like
[01:13:59.600 --> 01:14:00.600]  myself.
[01:14:00.600 --> 01:14:09.840]  The only way we're going to win this is to alleviate, you create more alleviates.
[01:14:09.840 --> 01:14:12.640]  We can do this.
[01:14:12.640 --> 01:14:18.240]  We can do it, but I'm kind of afraid because me, I'm tough enough to take it.
[01:14:18.240 --> 01:14:22.840]  I know what it would kind of take on your life, but when I see people changing in front
[01:14:22.840 --> 01:14:30.640]  of my eyes, I'm like, oh my God, listen, don't educate yourself first before you do anything.
[01:14:30.640 --> 01:14:31.640]  It's difficult.
[01:14:31.640 --> 01:14:39.680]  I do it because just like you said, for some reason, I have the life where I can bounce
[01:14:39.680 --> 01:14:44.680]  all of these things and not get affected, so I totally understand what you're saying.
[01:14:44.680 --> 01:14:50.480]  I'm not saying that everyone should do it, but we should get together to alleviate the
[01:14:50.480 --> 01:14:56.440]  stress so we could stop bringing our children to these public schools.
[01:14:56.440 --> 01:15:04.640]  If we come together and create our own schooling, one that is based on facts, one that is based
[01:15:04.640 --> 01:15:14.080]  on law on how to apply and protect yourself, by the time you graduate fifth grade, you
[01:15:14.080 --> 01:15:17.680]  should be able to write and stay to claim.
[01:15:17.680 --> 01:15:23.280]  You should be able to write a philosophy before you get to middle school.
[01:15:23.280 --> 01:15:28.440]  Well, on the other side, we're moving in that direction.
[01:15:28.440 --> 01:15:32.560]  We now have school vouchers, people can home school.
[01:15:32.560 --> 01:15:39.960]  That took a lot to get homeschooling approved, and we're taking a lot of this away from the
[01:15:39.960 --> 01:15:44.520]  public school systems, so we're moving in that direction.
[01:15:44.520 --> 01:15:50.000]  It's just very large companies, a country, and it's hard to make change.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:52.560]  It should be hard to make change.
[01:15:52.560 --> 01:15:53.560]  I don't think it's hard to make change.
[01:15:53.560 --> 01:16:00.280]  I think everybody tells me, like every time I talk to somebody, they tell me that I explain
[01:16:00.280 --> 01:16:02.200]  it very well.
[01:16:02.200 --> 01:16:06.360]  They've heard it before, and they thought it was a whole bunch of bologna, but the way
[01:16:06.360 --> 01:16:12.400]  I explain it to them and I take them down and show them all the facts, I open like there
[01:16:12.400 --> 01:16:14.040]  is no doubt in it now.
[01:16:14.040 --> 01:16:20.480]  I realize that the people are not taking it seriously, they feel it, but they're not taking
[01:16:20.480 --> 01:16:24.600]  it seriously because they don't have all the facts in front of them to test how dangerous
[01:16:24.600 --> 01:16:26.600]  this is.
[01:16:26.600 --> 01:16:35.120]  If you can create 10 people like you, you've done your job.
[01:16:35.120 --> 01:16:40.240]  Hang on, go into our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Our Radio.
[01:16:40.240 --> 01:16:45.440]  We have a, we've got one empty space on our cardboard.
[01:16:45.440 --> 01:16:53.200]  We are into the last hour, so we'll probably get pretty close with the colors we have.
[01:16:53.200 --> 01:17:00.480]  So hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.480 --> 01:17:05.160]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.160 --> 01:17:09.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.200 --> 01:17:13.600]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:17:13.600 --> 01:17:14.600]  can win two.
[01:17:14.600 --> 01:17:19.440]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.440 --> 01:17:21.080]  civil rights statute.
[01:17:21.080 --> 01:17:25.840]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and
[01:17:25.840 --> 01:17:30.240]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial
[01:17:30.240 --> 01:17:34.000]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:39.120]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.120 --> 01:17:41.080]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.080 --> 01:17:46.800]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[01:17:46.800 --> 01:17:49.800]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.800 --> 01:17:57.480]  It's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.480 --> 01:18:00.480]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.480 --> 01:18:01.480]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.480 --> 01:18:04.840]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.840 --> 01:18:07.640]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.640 --> 01:18:08.840]  I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:13.560]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.560 --> 01:18:17.320]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[01:18:17.320 --> 01:18:20.680]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.680 --> 01:18:22.200]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:24.080]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.080 --> 01:18:27.480]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.480 --> 01:18:29.480]  You can order new supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.480 --> 01:18:31.640]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.640 --> 01:18:37.800]  Now, go to logosregulnetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo, and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.800 --> 01:18:43.760]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.760 --> 01:18:44.760]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.760 --> 01:18:45.760]  No.
[01:18:45.760 --> 01:18:47.480]  Do I pay anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.480 --> 01:18:48.480]  No.
[01:18:48.480 --> 01:18:49.480]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.480 --> 01:18:50.480]  No.
[01:18:50.480 --> 01:18:51.480]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.480 --> 01:18:56.200]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:18:57.200]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:18:58.760]  We are logos.
[01:18:58.760 --> 01:19:00.760]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:00.760 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the logos, logos, radio, net video, net video, net video, net video, net video,
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:21.200]  net video, net video, net video, net video.
[01:19:21.200 --> 01:19:32.700]  OK, we are back.
[01:19:32.700 --> 01:19:36.440]  Brandi Kelton, Brett Fountain, Google Fire Radio, and we're talking to Scott and Olivier.
[01:19:36.440 --> 01:19:40.200]  I need to tell you guys about Olivier.
[01:19:40.200 --> 01:19:46.600]  I first started talking to Olivier, he was calling me to the show, and then I went up
[01:19:46.600 --> 01:19:51.920]  to Tennessee to take care of my mom, and it turned out Olivier was about 90 miles away
[01:19:51.920 --> 01:19:59.600]  from me in Clarksville, Tennessee, and I went down to watch him in court one day.
[01:19:59.600 --> 01:20:10.640]  And Olivier came in, and he's a black guy, a really black guy, with dreadlocks, and he
[01:20:10.640 --> 01:20:15.960]  had a look, I looked at him and I thought, I would not want to run into this guy in a
[01:20:15.960 --> 01:20:22.960]  dark alley, and then he stood up in front of the court and opened his mouth, and I could
[01:20:22.960 --> 01:20:30.760]  not believe the dichotomy here. I looked at him and got the impression of one type of
[01:20:30.760 --> 01:20:37.520]  individual, a stereotype, and he opened his mouth and that stereotype went in the toilet.
[01:20:37.520 --> 01:20:43.640]  And I watched the judge and everybody else staring at him, and they weren't believing.
[01:20:43.640 --> 01:20:54.440]  The guy was more articulate and professional than lawyers and the judges. He has an impressive
[01:20:54.440 --> 01:21:04.360]  presentation. I can imagine people paying close attention to you, Olivier, because you're
[01:21:04.360 --> 01:21:14.560]  a study in contrast. You are put in this place to do what you're doing. You can turn a lot
[01:21:14.560 --> 01:21:23.280]  of people. And I do this show to find guys like you. I've got a few of them. It's my
[01:21:23.280 --> 01:21:30.600]  job to find people like you and help you become like me, help you to know what I know and
[01:21:30.600 --> 01:21:39.520]  then take your skill and your particular style and deliver it out there. I can't reach everybody.
[01:21:39.520 --> 01:21:46.080]  If I can create 10 people who can do what I'm doing, when I stand in front of St. Peter
[01:21:46.080 --> 01:21:51.960]  and he said, and he asked, what did you do that made a difference? I pointed these 10
[01:21:51.960 --> 01:22:00.280]  guys and did my job. We don't need everybody, Olivier, and you will talk to a lot of these
[01:22:00.280 --> 01:22:06.600]  people and they will listen to you and say, oh, this is great and wonderful. Oh, you got
[01:22:06.600 --> 01:22:11.920]  to keep doing this. And then they'll go back to their lives and keep doing the same things
[01:22:11.920 --> 01:22:23.200]  they were doing. Do not get frustrated by that. Most people just have too much going
[01:22:23.200 --> 01:22:29.280]  on, too many responsibilities. They can't do this. You're just looking for the few who
[01:22:29.280 --> 01:22:41.080]  just need a little push. I didn't give you much. I'm not frustrated by it because one,
[01:22:41.080 --> 01:22:47.400]  I got a plan now. Now that I saw this, I was like, well, instead of crying, he said, well,
[01:22:47.400 --> 01:22:53.080]  what can you do? Then I looked at my equation. I'm like, wait a minute. I could attack the
[01:22:53.080 --> 01:22:57.280]  legislature. I could attack the legislature, which I'm going to file a lawsuit against
[01:22:57.280 --> 01:23:06.280]  them on their statutes within the Transportation Act, which crossed over to the automobile
[01:23:06.280 --> 01:23:15.480]  as far as the violation of due process and equal protection law and equal protection.
[01:23:15.480 --> 01:23:22.960]  I could attack them that way. But the thing is, I've done over 75% of the work by finding
[01:23:22.960 --> 01:23:28.280]  the equation and how to use it and everything. Now, all I have to do is implement the second
[01:23:28.280 --> 01:23:35.760]  part of it, which we, me and Troy, thought about this years ago. We thought about, hey,
[01:23:35.760 --> 01:23:42.480]  why don't, because I'm good at carpentry, automotive. I'm a handyman. I'm a master.
[01:23:42.480 --> 01:23:48.720]  I'm a master. I'm often charged with math. I'm very good at math. So when we were looking
[01:23:48.720 --> 01:23:53.600]  at it, we were thinking about it a year ago, like, how can we get this thing going or make
[01:23:53.600 --> 01:23:58.480]  a difference? We were like, well, we could start a plantation or a farm because we're
[01:23:58.480 --> 01:24:05.160]  really into good health too. So we got a farm and get people who are interested and build
[01:24:05.160 --> 01:24:12.400]  on that property and then let them live there. Let them be able to quit their job. You know,
[01:24:12.400 --> 01:24:20.080]  don't need a babysitter because the community would take care of them. And our job is to
[01:24:20.080 --> 01:24:28.640]  attack the law system and not a law system to expose these things. And then we could
[01:24:28.640 --> 01:24:34.480]  do, we could start from one state. Once that gets going, we get a name and say people would
[01:24:34.480 --> 01:24:40.480]  now become easier for me to convince people to come to my plantation or to the farm that
[01:24:40.480 --> 01:24:47.200]  I'm building in that state. To come and live, reside, you're saying, have time to spend,
[01:24:47.200 --> 01:24:53.760]  raise their children. Don't have to pay for their place of staying. And all they have
[01:24:53.760 --> 01:25:01.680]  to do is commit time to the farm and commit time to doing legal papers, legal ventures
[01:25:01.680 --> 01:25:10.960]  with us. So basically we had the plan before we signed the equation. So now it's like,
[01:25:10.960 --> 01:25:15.760]  oh, I got the equation. Now I got the plan. We thought about the plan a long time ago.
[01:25:15.760 --> 01:25:25.040]  Now we just got to put it together. And I'm working on something that will be helpful.
[01:25:25.040 --> 01:25:36.240]  I was arrested and put in jail for 48 hours, I'm sorry, 28 hours. I'm suing the county
[01:25:36.240 --> 01:25:46.320]  for 5.6 million for those 28 hours. And I won't ever win this at the end of the day.
[01:25:48.240 --> 01:25:53.040]  But I can beat them up enough. I've got all these dirty rotten scoundrel tools that I use
[01:25:53.040 --> 01:25:55.600]  that I can get them to come to the table and write me a check.
[01:25:59.440 --> 01:26:05.600]  This is how we're going to beat them. Somebody sent me a video of two black guys in a white
[01:26:05.600 --> 01:26:11.920]  neighborhood. They're up on this porch fiddling with the doorknob. A white guy,
[01:26:13.440 --> 01:26:18.640]  retired cop sees these two black guys. They don't recognize them. And they're messing with the
[01:26:18.640 --> 01:26:23.760]  doorknob. They finally get the door open going in and he thinks, that didn't look right. So he
[01:26:23.760 --> 01:26:28.480]  called the police. The police come and they bring the guys out and they're talking to them. One of
[01:26:28.480 --> 01:26:33.840]  the guys gets kind of annoyed and excited. So they cuff both of them and they apologize. This is
[01:26:33.840 --> 01:26:40.480]  just for our safety. The policemen were real professional the whole time. They were never
[01:26:40.480 --> 01:26:45.680]  aggressive or insulting. And they checked them out. These two guys had bought this house at auction.
[01:26:45.680 --> 01:26:50.320]  And they finally verified all that and they released them and apologized for the inconvenience.
[01:26:51.680 --> 01:26:58.960]  They sued them. The city of Cincinnati settled for a hundred and seventy thousand dollars.
[01:27:04.240 --> 01:27:08.160]  That's a good way to make money here. The only way you're going to win at the end of
[01:27:08.160 --> 01:27:13.120]  today is all about the money. If you're going to beat these jurisdictions about the money,
[01:27:13.120 --> 01:27:18.400]  if they have to start digging into their budget and paying you, they'll fix things.
[01:27:19.600 --> 01:27:23.840]  And that's convenient because you get to generate some income. What if you built a plantation of
[01:27:23.840 --> 01:27:32.560]  people who specialized in setting up jurisdictions to give them reason to sue them? Now, that sounds
[01:27:32.560 --> 01:27:44.720]  mercenary, but it's not. How do we get these guys to follow law? We reach inside their wallet and
[01:27:44.720 --> 01:27:51.280]  get a hold of their budget. That's how we get them to follow law. Never been about law. It's
[01:27:51.280 --> 01:27:57.920]  always been about the money. If somebody knows that they have a team fighting for them, they
[01:27:57.920 --> 01:28:02.640]  will be more willing to. They know that, hey, something has to happen to me. My kids are taking
[01:28:02.640 --> 01:28:08.480]  care of me and they're coming to get me. They're going to be more than happy to be part of it.
[01:28:10.480 --> 01:28:15.840]  Can we back up a little bit, Olivier? How would your equal protection argument work?
[01:28:15.840 --> 01:28:18.640]  Did you say that was for traffic? Would you cite a protected class?
[01:28:18.640 --> 01:28:29.520]  Equal protection. Equal protection is a category and what equal protection means is that when
[01:28:30.960 --> 01:28:38.560]  the legislatures write a law and the law has the effect to
[01:28:38.560 --> 01:28:48.160]  transverse into a protected area, the legislature has to write in that statute
[01:28:49.280 --> 01:28:57.840]  reference to that right that the individuals have and they have to write clearly clear
[01:28:57.840 --> 01:29:07.600]  instructions to the people who are regulating that statute on how to deal with people who have
[01:29:07.600 --> 01:29:21.440]  the right and the people who have the privilege. So underneath the driver's license that in any
[01:29:21.440 --> 01:29:29.840]  state, all states are supposed to reference the right to use an automobile on roads and highways.
[01:29:29.840 --> 01:29:37.120]  And then they're supposed to explain to the officers how to deal or how to acknowledge
[01:29:37.120 --> 01:29:42.800]  someone who's in the vehicle and someone who's in the automobile.
[01:29:43.760 --> 01:29:47.920]  Okay, hang on. Do I have to go to our sponsors? We're under Kelton, Brett,
[01:29:47.920 --> 01:30:01.600]  Fountain. We've got a full board. We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.600 --> 01:30:07.440]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid,
[01:30:07.440 --> 01:30:11.680]  the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[01:30:11.680 --> 01:30:19.200]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. Back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:48.080]  Start over with Start Page. Governments love power, so it's only natural
[01:30:48.080 --> 01:30:52.400]  they'd want to control the power going into your home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.400 --> 01:30:57.280]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric use for
[01:30:57.280 --> 01:31:03.760]  efficiency and avoid grid failure. But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast if we make
[01:31:03.760 --> 01:31:08.960]  the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day. Working
[01:31:08.960 --> 01:31:14.640]  remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
[01:31:15.200 --> 01:31:18.960]  I'd want to pose smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:18.960 --> 01:31:23.360]  But catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.920 --> 01:31:28.720]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.360 --> 01:31:36.800]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.800 --> 01:31:41.600]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:41.600 --> 01:31:46.160]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given
[01:31:46.160 --> 01:31:50.480]  their lives. And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:50.480 --> 01:31:54.240]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.240 --> 01:31:58.960]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:58.960 --> 01:32:08.960]  RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.960 --> 01:32:40.320]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rulelawradio.com and
[01:32:40.320 --> 01:32:44.000]  ordering your copy today. By wearing now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:48.960]  Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds
[01:32:48.960 --> 01:32:52.720]  of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[01:32:52.720 --> 01:32:57.600]  with the help of this material from rulelawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have
[01:32:57.600 --> 01:32:59.600]  the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:27.600 --> 01:33:49.600]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelvin, Brett Fountain, rulelaw radio, and we're talking to Scott and
[01:33:49.600 --> 01:33:58.800]  Olivier. Olivier, we really need to move along. Send me that information on Royce
[01:33:58.800 --> 01:34:08.160]  Revegnes. What happened was a bunch of states skipped over the part where they were supposed
[01:34:08.160 --> 01:34:13.120]  to honor your right to drive, and they just jumped to regulating it as a privilege, and
[01:34:13.120 --> 01:34:22.880]  that's a problem, right? They gave them the right to regulate transportation to protect us,
[01:34:23.760 --> 01:34:29.520]  right? But transportation is because the way that we travel now, transportation
[01:34:30.480 --> 01:34:38.800]  also resembles us using our automobile, which is a private object which belongs to the household.
[01:34:38.800 --> 01:34:47.520]  So we have the right to use our automobile on there. So by law, the legislature has to make
[01:34:48.320 --> 01:34:57.120]  accommodations in that statute so that we won't get arrested underneath a transportation code,
[01:34:57.680 --> 01:35:04.240]  which has nothing to do with us. It resembles transportation, but we're not in transportation.
[01:35:04.240 --> 01:35:11.120]  Okay. Yep, that makes sense. I know we're going from there, yeah.
[01:35:11.120 --> 01:35:18.400]  That makes sense. Yeah, it's equal protection. You're protecting us from crime, but you also
[01:35:18.400 --> 01:35:25.040]  have to protect us from the officers who are trying to regulate that crime because we have
[01:35:25.040 --> 01:35:34.240]  well put. Well put, Olivier. Thanks. If it's not in there, you have violated my equal protection
[01:35:34.240 --> 01:35:42.720]  rights. It is your job to make everyone know what my rights are, but you took over the system and
[01:35:42.720 --> 01:35:47.920]  didn't explain to me as a child how to do that, and now you get to do whatever you want.
[01:35:47.920 --> 01:35:53.600]  Got it. And we're in the process of putting an end to that.
[01:35:54.960 --> 01:35:58.320]  Right. But we do need to move ahead. We've got two more callers who've been on a long time.
[01:35:59.440 --> 01:36:05.840]  Olivier, call back next week. Okay, I'm seeing you. I think we need more time with you.
[01:36:07.280 --> 01:36:11.200]  Okay. Okay. Scott, did you have something else?
[01:36:12.320 --> 01:36:14.960]  Yeah, a couple weeks ago we had a good talk about jurisdiction,
[01:36:14.960 --> 01:36:21.040]  and I was just curious what you think the limits are of that. I mean, traffic is easy because
[01:36:21.680 --> 01:36:27.040]  when you take your pick, the laws don't apply, no jurisdiction, no victim. But what about if
[01:36:27.040 --> 01:36:34.720]  you get into a case where somebody claims they have damages or harm, like a fender bender or a
[01:36:35.440 --> 01:36:39.520]  simple assault when there's somebody saying that they're a victim? How does that change
[01:36:39.520 --> 01:36:46.320]  how you would use the jurisdiction argument? Well, it depends on the nature of the claim.
[01:36:48.480 --> 01:36:56.560]  Jurisdiction has been pretty well defined. A judge must, actually, that's a little too
[01:36:57.600 --> 01:37:04.240]  vague and open for me to answer specifically. Well, it also seems to like that particular
[01:37:04.240 --> 01:37:12.320]  kind of example bleeds all over into crimes that are like common law. This person harmed me,
[01:37:12.320 --> 01:37:17.120]  he hurt me. He did something that was, it doesn't really fit into the transportation
[01:37:18.320 --> 01:37:23.520]  so much because whether or not they were speeding, I suppose, or whether they were
[01:37:23.520 --> 01:37:27.840]  operating with defective equipment, that's not the issue. The issue is that they hurt them.
[01:37:27.840 --> 01:37:33.840]  And so then you have, it could be a civil issue, which is like a tort, somebody did
[01:37:33.840 --> 01:37:37.680]  something wrong, they were negligent or they were criminally negligent. There's
[01:37:37.680 --> 01:37:46.000]  other things that it goes to besides transportation there. Okay. Yeah, every jurisdiction
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:53.120]  issue would have to fall within the specific authority of an agent who is expressing that
[01:37:53.120 --> 01:38:00.480]  jurisdiction. So it would go to the facts of each case. I don't have a way of giving a blanket
[01:38:01.120 --> 01:38:06.080]  statement of jurisdiction. But generally speaking, the same jurisdiction argument
[01:38:06.080 --> 01:38:15.680]  from traffic would work well in a criminal case? No. No. Okay. Yeah, the specific issue is
[01:38:15.680 --> 01:38:24.320]  is that the complaint does not establish that you fall within the statutory scheme.
[01:38:26.080 --> 01:38:35.440]  If the complaint does not allege commerce, then it's insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction
[01:38:35.440 --> 01:38:40.400]  of the court because it doesn't show that you fall within the statutory scheme because the
[01:38:40.400 --> 01:38:47.040]  statutory scheme only applies to commercial transportation. Now, if you commit a crime,
[01:38:47.040 --> 01:38:52.800]  if you're accused of committing a crime, the criminal courts have jurisdiction by virtue
[01:38:52.800 --> 01:39:02.880]  of the accusation because the criminal court addresses penal code violations.
[01:39:02.880 --> 01:39:08.080]  So they automatically have subject matter jurisdiction in criminal?
[01:39:09.200 --> 01:39:13.680]  If the complaint alleges all of the elements, yes.
[01:39:15.520 --> 01:39:16.960]  Okay. What about in persona?
[01:39:18.880 --> 01:39:26.400]  In persona, if that would depend on the sufficiency of the complaint itself
[01:39:26.400 --> 01:39:34.800]  and whether or not you fall within the jurisdiction of the court, there's a lot of things about in
[01:39:34.800 --> 01:39:42.720]  persona. It all goes to the nature of the claim that you make. And so it's hard to say just
[01:39:42.720 --> 01:39:54.000]  generally. The law must be clear that you as a person are subject to this jurisdiction,
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:02.480]  like the criminal codes. If you place yourself within the territorial jurisdiction, then you
[01:40:02.480 --> 01:40:10.880]  bind yourself to an adhesive contract wherein you agree to abide by the penal laws. And if a
[01:40:12.640 --> 01:40:19.680]  crime is alleged to have been committed by you within the boundaries of this jurisdiction,
[01:40:19.680 --> 01:40:26.080]  that's something that the criminal court would have jurisdiction to adjudicate.
[01:40:30.080 --> 01:40:32.720]  So why don't they use the same justification for traffic?
[01:40:34.800 --> 01:40:41.680]  Traffic goes primarily to commerce. Okay.
[01:40:41.680 --> 01:40:52.720]  If they allege that you were transporting people or property for hire and in the process you violated
[01:40:52.720 --> 01:40:58.320]  a transportation code statute, then the court has jurisdiction.
[01:41:00.800 --> 01:41:08.640]  Right. The primary thing in traffic is they don't allege facts to establish transportation.
[01:41:08.640 --> 01:41:10.400]  Right.
[01:41:14.240 --> 01:41:17.680]  Okay. Do you have anything else? We're really running out of time.
[01:41:17.680 --> 01:41:21.920]  That's definitely good. Thank you very much. And thanks, Olivier. Take care, Brett.
[01:41:22.640 --> 01:41:26.160]  Okay. Thank you, Scott. Okay. Now we're going to Ted in California. Hello, Ted.
[01:41:28.080 --> 01:41:33.840]  Good evening, Randy and Brett. So what do you have for us today?
[01:41:33.840 --> 01:41:46.640]  Well, I'm going to follow up. I read the night circuit, what was it called? They wanted a statement
[01:41:46.640 --> 01:41:52.960]  from me. I read that to you last night. Yes. If anyone is listening who didn't listen last night,
[01:41:52.960 --> 01:42:03.200]  we brought Ted on very, very first thing. You should go on to Thursday nights and listen to that
[01:42:04.080 --> 01:42:11.040]  statement. That's how it's supposed to be done. It was a nice job.
[01:42:11.040 --> 01:42:20.640]  And that's what you get when you listen in and shout out to Olivier. Really good to
[01:42:20.640 --> 01:42:27.840]  hear him on here. I heard him years ago on here. And if you tune in and listen,
[01:42:29.440 --> 01:42:38.000]  I thought a lot of what I was able to put into that statement that my appeal is not
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:46.640]  frivolous comes from what I've learned on here. So to follow on tonight, I first thing this morning
[01:42:48.160 --> 01:42:55.920]  did a new bar complaint. The bar complaint is against a public defender. I've been fighting
[01:42:56.480 --> 01:43:06.640]  a false state criminal charge for six years, the charge of recording a quit claim deed on my home
[01:43:06.640 --> 01:43:14.800]  of 32 years at the time. But bottom down for more than six years, a year ago, they stuck this
[01:43:14.800 --> 01:43:22.400]  public defender on me. The judge did it. Other judges wouldn't do it, but this judge decided
[01:43:22.400 --> 01:43:27.600]  he was going to do it. And I immediately turned around and filed a civil lawsuit against the
[01:43:27.600 --> 01:43:37.360]  public defender's office and specifically this deputy public defender. I bet you made his day.
[01:43:37.360 --> 01:43:42.640]  Hang on. Go on to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fouton, Ruella Radio.
[01:43:42.640 --> 01:43:59.440]  Irvin, I see you there. We'll get to you before this is done. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.560 --> 01:44:06.480]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.480 --> 01:44:11.360]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.360 --> 01:44:17.680]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.680 --> 01:44:22.400]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.400 --> 01:44:28.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo Sweden Network gets many requests
[01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:34.480]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.480 --> 01:44:40.000]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:46.800]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[01:44:46.800 --> 01:44:53.120]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:53.120 --> 01:44:59.840]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:03.440 --> 01:45:06.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.000 --> 01:45:12.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD
[01:45:12.880 --> 01:45:20.000]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:24.800]  lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.520 --> 01:45:32.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:32.000 --> 01:45:38.880]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:38.880 --> 01:45:44.160]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[01:45:44.160 --> 01:45:50.960]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[01:45:50.960 --> 01:45:58.880]  civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit LulevLawRadio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:58.880 --> 01:46:02.880]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:28.880 --> 01:46:35.840]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brent Stout, LulevLawRadio, and we're talking to Ted in California.
[01:46:35.840 --> 01:46:43.520]  Okay, go ahead, Ted. Okay, so I've got some exciting news about the California bar website
[01:46:43.520 --> 01:46:50.560]  as well in just a second. But anyway, you are able to file a bar complaint online,
[01:46:51.280 --> 01:46:57.360]  or you can print out a PDF and fill it in and back it to them, mail it to them.
[01:46:57.360 --> 01:47:01.760]  The first question is, you know, what's the connection with the attorney? And I write,
[01:47:01.760 --> 01:47:07.440]  I have no connection with this attorney, and I am suing him and his boss, case number 19,
[01:47:07.440 --> 01:47:17.840]  PB 360335. He and his boss are trespassing on my estate. Then in the next category,
[01:47:17.840 --> 01:47:24.640]  I put this is notice that at this point, I intend to hold the California bar responsible
[01:47:24.640 --> 01:47:30.800]  for the conduct of bar members and the California bar failure to properly supervise,
[01:47:30.800 --> 01:47:38.960]  restrain, and discipline its members. Bar member Gregory Howard Goldman, 16952,
[01:47:38.960 --> 01:47:47.200]  and Martha Jane O'Neill, who is the public defender, along with the aid of Karan Singh
[01:47:47.200 --> 01:47:55.920]  Dalewala and James Williams. Those two individuals are county lawyers. James William is the county
[01:47:55.920 --> 01:48:05.200]  lawyer. I'm naming them because what's gone on in my case here, guys, is their action and
[01:48:05.200 --> 01:48:13.760]  everything is documented. But basically, we have a RICO here. The judges are receiving payments
[01:48:13.760 --> 01:48:19.840]  from the county. The judges are state court judges. Their employment, their compensation,
[01:48:19.840 --> 01:48:25.600]  all comes from the state of California. What the heck is Santa Clara County doing paying these
[01:48:25.600 --> 01:48:32.000]  judges between $40,000 and $60,000 a year in addition to their compensation from the state?
[01:48:32.880 --> 01:48:39.280]  And then you get into a situation like this where who's prosecuting you? The county DA.
[01:48:39.280 --> 01:48:47.040]  So the county DA knows that the judges are getting these payments. The judges want to keep
[01:48:47.040 --> 01:48:52.160]  getting these payments so they obviously don't want to do anything to upset the DA, do they?
[01:48:52.960 --> 01:49:01.360]  And the wonder for over six years now, every motion I've filed has been denied. And even a
[01:49:01.360 --> 01:49:10.320]  motion where they, the DA, they were still afraid of my motion. They didn't even show up. So basically
[01:49:10.320 --> 01:49:17.760]  what I'm doing with the FAR complaint is I go on and say that the two individuals I just named
[01:49:18.320 --> 01:49:26.720]  and they're county lawyers. The one lawyer is representing Martha Jane O'Neill and Howard
[01:49:26.720 --> 01:49:34.080]  Goldman, the two public defenders, against me and this civil lawsuit. Okay. So then I go on and I
[01:49:34.080 --> 01:49:40.480]  say, you know, this is conspiracy and a ricoch, convict, complainant, you know, me, Ed Scarlett,
[01:49:40.480 --> 01:49:46.800]  Sidney Scarlett, Gregory Howard Goldman is trespassing on my court matters and he has been
[01:49:46.800 --> 01:49:53.280]  noticed to cease and desist. I am playing up in a lawsuit against Mr. Goldman, which means,
[01:49:53.280 --> 01:50:00.560]  and he's represented by the lawyer, which means he can't talk to me. So he's interfering with a
[01:50:00.560 --> 01:50:10.240]  witness. His actions are harassing. Okay. Wait, Ted, wait, Ted, we don't have time to go through
[01:50:10.240 --> 01:50:18.960]  the whole suit. We've got one more caller. Got it. So just what I did, Randy, I sent you a link
[01:50:18.960 --> 01:50:25.840]  to the FAR complaint and how you can make FAR complaints. I called friends of mine. We all,
[01:50:26.400 --> 01:50:32.400]  I got several people to file FAR complaints. I have court on Monday. This will be like the 15th
[01:50:32.400 --> 01:50:36.720]  time that they've set a trial date and I don't know if it's going to go this time or not.
[01:50:37.520 --> 01:50:45.520]  And that's basically to wrap it up right there. Okay. Wonderful. Ted has really hung in there
[01:50:45.520 --> 01:50:52.400]  on these guys and you hang in there long enough. You're going to beat them. So I'm looking forward
[01:50:52.400 --> 01:50:58.000]  to this thing closing out for you soon, Ted, to get this off your plates so you can go back to your
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:08.400]  life. Well, at least take care of my elderly mom and thank you guys very much. Okay. Thank you, Ted.
[01:51:08.400 --> 01:51:13.280]  Now we're going to go to Irvin in Nevada. Hello, Irvin. What do you have for us today?
[01:51:13.280 --> 01:51:20.000]  Oh, hi, Randy. Yeah, not a lot. I just wanted you to opinion on a couple of the tactics
[01:51:20.560 --> 01:51:26.080]  this by you and then also by Alfant and I guess before Brent. I sent the
[01:51:28.400 --> 01:51:34.240]  our email, the insurance to the Special Agent of the FBI last time I'd done that prior to
[01:51:34.800 --> 01:51:41.280]  hearing your suggestions and it was pointedly ignored. But I was just wondering like, okay,
[01:51:41.280 --> 01:51:48.240]  when I read them out to the postal inspector, you know, can I really claim mail fraud? He's just
[01:51:48.240 --> 01:51:52.240]  going to probably say, well, I ignore them. I don't have time for that stuff or, you know,
[01:51:52.240 --> 01:51:58.000]  what are your thoughts on that? And to birth similarly, the Alfant's thing of sending it to
[01:51:58.720 --> 01:52:04.320]  the U.S. Attorney for the State of Nevada, as well as Attorney General from Nevada,
[01:52:04.320 --> 01:52:14.080]  including a letter or postcard, but just saying, send this to the foreman for the grand jury,
[01:52:14.080 --> 01:52:17.040]  much to stop them from just initially themselves and sending it back to me.
[01:52:18.400 --> 01:52:26.480]  Okay. That's the one thing you can do is then send an inquiry to the grand jury itself. But
[01:52:26.480 --> 01:52:33.760]  the U.S., I mean, the Special Agent in charge, he's just an investigator. He's not a judge.
[01:52:33.760 --> 01:52:42.080]  He doesn't get to decide what gets investigated and what didn't. If he doesn't take your complaint
[01:52:42.080 --> 01:52:46.560]  and present it to some magistrate, then he's in criminal violation.
[01:52:48.560 --> 01:52:55.760]  So then you forget about the original complaint. Now you go after the Special Agent in charge
[01:52:55.760 --> 01:53:04.480]  for shielding from prosecution. It's all about politics. It's about... I went out to the cops
[01:53:04.480 --> 01:53:07.840]  years ago with a criminal complaint. The cop whipped out his smartphone and said,
[01:53:07.840 --> 01:53:11.600]  if you look under DOJ, perjury, that's what I was going out there for, for a lawyer,
[01:53:12.160 --> 01:53:15.600]  is handled by the DOJ and specifically by the FBI. So I went all the way out the
[01:53:15.600 --> 01:53:20.640]  FBI office. They sent me and you sit around for 45 minutes while they check me out. And the agent
[01:53:20.640 --> 01:53:25.520]  comes out and he says, the DOJ thing notwithstanding, we feel this is a civil matter, not criminal.
[01:53:25.520 --> 01:53:29.280]  And I said, really? Can I speak to the supervisor? Another guy comes out and says that he agreed.
[01:53:29.280 --> 01:53:31.840]  And I asked for their names. They wouldn't give them to me. So...
[01:53:33.200 --> 01:53:38.480]  That's why I always direct you to the Special Agent in charge because you can get his name.
[01:53:40.480 --> 01:53:48.080]  You can hold him responsible. The rest of them are secret police. And that's why we
[01:53:48.080 --> 01:53:52.800]  suggest to press processes we do because now you have recourse to go after them.
[01:53:52.800 --> 01:53:59.120]  The Special Agent in charge is not a judge. He cannot hold an
[01:53:59.120 --> 01:54:04.000]  examining trial. He cannot make a determination a probable cause. If he does that,
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:06.640]  you charge him with impersonating a public official.
[01:54:09.120 --> 01:54:12.640]  And you just start creating negative politics for them.
[01:54:13.760 --> 01:54:19.840]  Yeah, they all got their snouts in the same trough and they all worked to protect one another.
[01:54:19.840 --> 01:54:24.560]  But at the end of the day, it's all politics. And when you start stinging that
[01:54:26.720 --> 01:54:32.000]  Special Agent in charge's professional career by filing criminal charges against him,
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  it puts marks on his chart.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:40.560]  You're in a little grand jury. I don't know what it is, though. I'm Randy. You mentioned
[01:54:40.560 --> 01:54:44.160]  trying to get the best best for us with the whole points that I find interesting. So,
[01:54:44.160 --> 01:54:48.080]  we don't know where the grand jury is far, but the attorney general for the state and the
[01:54:48.080 --> 01:54:54.080]  attorney don't know. You don't care if the grand jury gets it or not. What has
[01:54:54.080 --> 01:55:00.400]  effect is making grand jury noises. If the grand jury gets it, they'll just no bill it.
[01:55:01.840 --> 01:55:09.120]  We know that, but they don't know that. So, you file criminal charges against Special Agent
[01:55:09.120 --> 01:55:15.360]  in charge with the grand jury, the prosecutor is going to step in the way. Then you go after
[01:55:15.360 --> 01:55:21.440]  the prosecutor and you start putting marks on his chart and he's not going to be happy about that.
[01:55:22.560 --> 01:55:27.280]  And then, when both of them don't do anything they're supposed to, then you go to the U.S.
[01:55:27.280 --> 01:55:34.080]  Attorney in D.C. on both of them. And then they wind up with a call from the Justice Department
[01:55:34.080 --> 01:55:39.600]  in D.C. They won't know what's going on here. Why is this guy trying to get us to arrest you?
[01:55:39.600 --> 01:55:48.960]  It stings their career. It's all politics. And by the way, I got a call with Henderson,
[01:55:48.960 --> 01:55:54.320]  which borders Las Vegas, asking him who's the person who initiated the traffic
[01:55:54.320 --> 01:56:03.040]  losses against Mary Wife and herself respectively. And analogous to Alfonpo's thing, they said,
[01:56:03.040 --> 01:56:10.000]  oh, it's not generated. We don't get a district attorney until the case is adjudicated.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:13.120]  That sounds like a car before the horse to me. And the other one just said,
[01:56:14.240 --> 01:56:21.120]  it's automatically generated once you get a ticket. So, they're very much against
[01:56:21.120 --> 01:56:26.240]  mentioning an actual name. So, I guess freedom of information or a right to do something like that.
[01:56:26.240 --> 01:56:37.440]  No, okay. You don't care. Whatever court it goes to, whoever the designated prosecutor is,
[01:56:38.320 --> 01:56:44.800]  you go after him, the head prosecutor. If he's got a bunch of subordinates that are doing his
[01:56:44.800 --> 01:56:50.160]  work for him, you don't care about them. They all act in his name. He's responding to that superior.
[01:56:50.160 --> 01:56:56.880]  Best to go after somebody for something they didn't do. One of their subordinates did it.
[01:56:56.880 --> 01:57:03.920]  Tinnacle, Randy. He's going to be a nun. You know, I don't know who those guys are. I didn't
[01:57:03.920 --> 01:57:10.560]  hire those guys. I hired you. You hired those guys. If you didn't train them properly,
[01:57:10.560 --> 01:57:15.680]  your problem, not my problem. Too bad, so sad. Yeah, I get it.
[01:57:15.680 --> 01:57:20.480]  Exactly. They all answer to you.
[01:57:21.600 --> 01:57:22.480]  Buck stops here.
[01:57:24.720 --> 01:57:30.080]  Boss is, he gets it. What do you think is going to happen to the lawyer who actually did it?
[01:57:33.200 --> 01:57:37.600]  He's going to get a near fall. And, you know, Bargreaves Venom and professional conduct
[01:57:37.600 --> 01:57:44.640]  complaints, it stings their professional career. Brett filed against the lawyer in Wise County.
[01:57:44.640 --> 01:57:53.760]  He's been practicing for 20 years. That's the only Bargreaves he's ever had.
[01:57:55.440 --> 01:58:04.320]  And it clearly hurt his feelings. Okay, I'm sorry. We are just about out of time.
[01:58:05.040 --> 01:58:11.040]  We will be back next week. Errin, send me an email. We haven't talked in a while.
[01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:17.920]  Oh, okay. Okay, thank you.
[01:58:18.960 --> 01:58:24.960]  Okay, it's Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We will be back next week on our regular
[01:58:26.400 --> 01:58:31.360]  two hour and four hour show Thursday and Friday, respectively. So,
[01:58:32.960 --> 01:58:38.640]  collect up your questions and comments and listen to our show. Thank you all for listening
[01:58:38.640 --> 01:58:48.160]  and good night.
[01:58:50.320 --> 01:58:56.800]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.800 --> 01:59:02.240]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.240 --> 01:59:08.320]  what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.320 --> 01:59:16.640]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.640 --> 01:59:23.840]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.840 --> 01:59:30.240]  13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.240 --> 01:59:34.960]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:34.960 --> 01:59:49.760]  Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.760 --> 01:59:59.280]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com