[00:00.000 --> 00:06.860] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown. [00:06.860 --> 00:13.260] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals Gold $1,429 an ounce, [00:13.260 --> 00:21.520] Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude [00:21.520 --> 00:29.820] $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $200.00 [00:29.820 --> 00:41.480] $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin. [00:41.480 --> 00:52.600] Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated on [00:52.600 --> 00:58.320] Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and [00:58.320 --> 01:07.480] entering 40 today in history and recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill [01:07.480 --> 01:13.160] 1325 legalizing HEPA into taxes law back in June. County prosecutors around the state including [01:13.160 --> 01:17.480] Houston, Austin, and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even [01:17.480 --> 01:22.360] refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory [01:22.360 --> 01:27.240] equipment to test the earth for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney [01:27.240 --> 01:31.280] announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery [01:31.280 --> 01:35.960] of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including [01:35.960 --> 01:39.960] the Attorney General stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday [01:39.960 --> 01:44.560] that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate [01:44.560 --> 01:50.480] a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well as other cities too like the district [01:50.480 --> 01:56.680] attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the [01:56.680 --> 02:02.560] law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However the [02:02.560 --> 02:07.240] issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public defender in Harris [02:07.240 --> 02:12.040] County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based [02:12.040 --> 02:16.560] on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something the test [02:16.560 --> 02:25.240] matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and [02:25.240 --> 02:30.720] a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico. The specimen [02:30.720 --> 02:36.160] being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found [02:36.160 --> 02:41.200] way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper the shark [02:41.200 --> 02:47.640] secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized [02:47.640 --> 02:54.640] to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. [03:17.640 --> 03:47.220] Alright folks good evening this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show your host Eddie [03:47.220 --> 03:58.640] Craig it is January 20th, 2020. Alright well ain't that something. It's the 20th of 2020. [03:58.640 --> 04:03.960] Okay alright the phone lines are open if you want to start calling and getting the line [04:03.960 --> 04:12.280] on the call at board 512-646-1984. And just something real quick that I'd like to open [04:12.280 --> 04:24.560] with tonight it's not a diatribe it's more of a well and kind of thing. There was some [04:24.560 --> 04:28.280] young guy on Facebook who's talking about how he just started law school he's been a [04:28.280 --> 04:34.200] member of one of my legal discussion groups and he's never exhibited a real aptitude for [04:34.200 --> 04:38.680] understanding the things that you tell him when it comes to law and legal issues but [04:38.680 --> 04:48.680] he enrolled in law school anyway. And then yesterday out of the blue he makes the announcement [04:48.680 --> 04:58.760] that he's in law school and that I'm only right 5% of the time. Okay now granted he [04:58.760 --> 05:04.800] offered no evidence as to how he came up with that number or why he thinks that number is [05:04.800 --> 05:12.720] even remotely accurate and personally I don't care because I know better but the point being [05:12.720 --> 05:19.920] that if you listen to this show anytime at all and you've looked up the stuff that I've [05:19.920 --> 05:28.560] told you on this show at any point in that time then what I would like to know is how [05:28.560 --> 05:38.320] many of you have actually found where what I was telling you was incorrect. If I've got [05:38.320 --> 05:47.400] it wrong I want to know and if I don't and you're saying I do then I want you to be [05:47.400 --> 05:53.560] able to prove up your side of the argument because I don't tell people things that I [05:53.560 --> 06:00.080] can't substantially verify and almost always am in a position and on this show I do provide [06:00.080 --> 06:06.480] you with the source of the information I am using to tell you what I'm telling you and [06:06.480 --> 06:17.240] then I admonish you to always go look it up. Do not believe me go look it up. Now my best [06:17.240 --> 06:25.720] guess on why he's saying this is because he is comparing what I'm saying to court rulings [06:25.720 --> 06:33.280] on similar but not exactly the legally the same issues. See the one thing he doesn't [06:33.280 --> 06:40.160] appear to have picked up in law school yet is that lawyers like to make arguments that [06:40.160 --> 06:45.160] skew all the facts in their favor whether they actually belong on the side of the scale [06:45.160 --> 06:53.200] they're placing them or not and the courts being lawyers are no different. When they [06:53.200 --> 06:58.080] make an opinion they want to skew the facts in favor of how they're ruling to make it [06:58.080 --> 07:03.800] look like they know what they're talking about as much as possible. So let me clue you in [07:03.800 --> 07:10.920] on something really really quick here. If I'm arguing that a court case is invalid in [07:10.920 --> 07:19.520] its opinion because it failed to properly cite the law then you are not going to convince [07:19.520 --> 07:25.520] me I am wrong by trying to use that same court case to show me where the court said so and [07:25.520 --> 07:33.520] so. You get it? Why would I accept from you that the court ruled correctly when I'm sitting [07:33.520 --> 07:39.000] here arguing the case you're holding in my face was ruled upon incorrectly because it [07:39.000 --> 07:47.880] did not properly interpret and apply the law and the opinion itself is absolute proof that [07:47.880 --> 07:55.400] they did not interpret and properly apply the law because there is tons of relevant [07:55.400 --> 08:05.360] statutory facts that address other issues in the facts of that case as far as the law [08:05.360 --> 08:12.160] itself is concerned that shows the way the court is reading the law is to be completely [08:12.160 --> 08:20.920] incorrect but they never bring up those parts of the law they never look at those parts [08:20.920 --> 08:31.320] of the law they never rule on those parts of the law. In which case if I'm saying here's [08:31.320 --> 08:37.200] the one thing the court addressed and here's the nine things that prove the court did not [08:37.200 --> 08:43.320] properly interpret and apply the law why would I give weight to the one thing you're hanging [08:43.320 --> 08:52.880] on to for dear life to prove your point when I've got nine that says you're wrong. So to [08:52.880 --> 08:58.040] the gentleman who made that comment in my legal discussion group you know who you are [08:58.040 --> 09:05.680] if I'm wrong then use the law not the court opinions because I'm telling you the court [09:05.680 --> 09:14.240] opinions are every single last one dead wrong because not a single one of them has addressed [09:14.240 --> 09:21.000] the stuff I'm talking about that I talk about on this show that leaks it all together from [09:21.000 --> 09:30.160] top to bottom not just the cherry picking they use to make the rulings they make. In [09:30.160 --> 09:38.120] every single court ruling where that opinion has said the law is such and such they have [09:38.120 --> 09:44.760] treated the particular statute they're referring to as if that statute is the sole subject [09:44.760 --> 09:59.720] of the law and it is not. It is a subordinate component object of the overhead object the [09:59.720 --> 10:07.840] one that encloses it all and the one that must enclose it all because of the constitutional [10:07.840 --> 10:16.320] mandate that every legislative act must have a single subject which all the statutes in [10:16.320 --> 10:23.880] that statutory enactment must adhere to in their application and purpose and if they [10:23.880 --> 10:32.560] deviate from that they are unconstitutional on their face. Now the fact that you don't [10:32.560 --> 10:41.160] know this and the fact that law school will never ever teach you how to understand this [10:41.160 --> 10:49.040] does not qualify you in any way whatsoever to tell me that I'm 5% right when you cannot [10:49.040 --> 11:01.800] refute the stuff I've got in front of me. Attorneys don't know the law, judges don't [11:01.800 --> 11:10.200] know the law. They only know the opinions of the other judges. They only know the opinion [11:10.200 --> 11:19.440] they hold and want to argue but they don't know the law and I have proven that time and [11:19.440 --> 11:26.960] time and time and time and time and time and time again on this show. I have shown you [11:26.960 --> 11:31.680] a court ruling, I have shown you the statute and there was no question the court ruling [11:31.680 --> 11:37.200] did not properly address the statute and in relation to the transportation code side [11:37.200 --> 11:45.000] of things there are multiple codes and multiple dozens of statutes that link this stuff together [11:45.000 --> 11:53.080] that prove the exact opposite of everything the courts have ruled upon but none of those [11:53.080 --> 11:58.920] links are ever mentioned, they're never brought up, they're never used in an opinion despite [11:58.920 --> 12:08.200] the fact that they are controlling over the very decisions the courts are making. So you [12:08.200 --> 12:15.040] want to tell me I'm wrong? Prove it. Until you can do that without a court opinion using [12:15.040 --> 12:22.880] only the law that they are ignoring then you have no qualification whatsoever to sit here [12:22.880 --> 12:28.520] and tell me that I'm only this amount right or that amount right. I'm not trying to say [12:28.520 --> 12:35.160] I'm always right, I'm not trying to say I'm 100% right in any way shape or form. It is [12:35.160 --> 12:40.560] possible I've got some of this wrong but you're damn well going to have to stand up and point [12:40.560 --> 12:48.760] it out and show me how your explanation makes mine incorrect. I've been at this too long, [12:48.760 --> 12:57.840] I've studied it too hard, I've drawn out my little statutory linking map too many times [12:57.840 --> 13:11.680] and I will lay every last dollar I've got that you have never, ever done the same. Got [13:11.680 --> 13:17.880] it? So you can say I'm wrong all you want to but you're going to find out that proving [13:17.880 --> 13:25.600] it is a whole other animal. Alright folks with that said we got about three and a half [13:25.600 --> 13:30.080] minutes before we go on our first break so I'm going to bring the first caller on but [13:30.080 --> 13:35.600] we may not get finished with him until after the break here. So first one up appears to [13:35.600 --> 13:42.400] be Roger in Wisconsin. Roger let me get you on here can you hear me? Yes hi Eddie first [13:42.400 --> 13:49.760] time caller great show I'm glad you cleared a few things up with what you just said and [13:49.760 --> 13:57.360] does this my question could it only apply to traffic or no or criminal as well. You can [13:57.360 --> 14:01.720] try anything if I don't know that subject of law I'll tell you and if you're going to [14:01.720 --> 14:05.320] ask me something specific about your state I will tell you you're going to need to look [14:05.320 --> 14:16.400] that up. Right well in Wisconsin in a criminal arraignment hearing which is one of the first [14:16.400 --> 14:27.280] things that happened I tried to interject to George and I wanted to file a criminal complaint [14:27.280 --> 14:32.400] and as I've learned you can't use the Burbage cross complaint because they don't recognize [14:32.400 --> 14:39.920] that apparently. Not in criminal cases they don't. Excuse me. Not in criminal cases they [14:39.920 --> 14:53.840] don't. Right and then I was basically shut down by the judge immediately and I felt previously [14:53.840 --> 15:02.560] known that a person has a right to access the court and counsel and I'd never met the [15:02.560 --> 15:09.080] state public defender before or anything and I wanted to talk to him and tell him I wanted [15:09.080 --> 15:16.680] to file a complaint and they wouldn't you basically for fear of being immediately you [15:16.680 --> 15:27.880] know in contempt of court I was stifled in my speech and basically in the statute I read [15:27.880 --> 15:37.920] it's a defender has a right to counsel through all phases of the criminal trial and even [15:37.920 --> 15:45.160] upon interrogation so I would think that an arraignment hearing would be within all phases [15:45.160 --> 15:50.280] of a criminal trial and then when I brought it to the attention of the SBD afterwards [15:50.280 --> 15:56.320] he said no nothing you can't do just nothing I could have done or understood it because [15:56.320 --> 16:04.040] I said why didn't you object and I probably agreed them for that. For not objecting and [16:04.040 --> 16:14.000] of course. Who is the person you're talking about? As far as the person being the state [16:14.000 --> 16:23.320] public defender. Okay so the state public defender was present? Yes it was the prosecutor [16:23.320 --> 16:27.440] the judge and the state public defender of which I've never spoke to before or matter [16:27.440 --> 16:32.640] or even known or anything. Okay and this is somebody that was helping you with your case [16:32.640 --> 16:39.880] that day? Yes. Alright then the first thing I've got to ask you before we get much further [16:39.880 --> 16:46.680] is what is your point then when it comes to assistance of counsel? Because it certainly [16:46.680 --> 16:54.960] sounds like counsel was provided. Well yeah that's part of their argument was counsel [16:54.960 --> 17:06.440] was provided but I'm is the answer. Okay well hang on a sec. It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network [17:06.440 --> 17:13.160] Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [17:13.160 --> 17:18.360] and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated everything helps to keep us on the air. From [17:18.360 --> 17:24.760] Central Texas Gun Works the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15. More [17:24.760 --> 17:30.640] prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. When you [17:30.640 --> 17:36.720] purchase Randy Kelton's ebook Legal 101 you get 4 chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's [17:36.720 --> 17:41.760] Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio [17:41.760 --> 17:47.000] Network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming [17:47.000 --> 17:52.680] on Talk Radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and remember every [17:52.680 --> 18:01.360] $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today. Are you [18:01.360 --> 18:06.480] being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt [18:06.480 --> 18:11.600] collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has won 6 cases in [18:11.600 --> 18:16.240] federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step by step [18:16.240 --> 18:21.520] instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:21.520 --> 18:26.520] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone [18:26.520 --> 18:31.160] calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables [18:31.160 --> 18:37.280] on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution [18:37.280 --> 18:41.960] for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more [18:41.960 --> 18:47.240] information please visit www.ruleslawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner [18:47.240 --> 18:56.680] or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m [18:56.680 --> 19:25.680] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next. [19:27.680 --> 19:35.680] That's my business, that's why I'm in my home. The headsets of men have to be in my [19:35.680 --> 19:40.680] key phone. I become handsome on top of the moon and star. [19:40.680 --> 19:48.680] Prayer's gonna go, now that I've fallen too far. You will come and go. On the bullet [19:48.680 --> 20:13.680] hits the ball. You will come and go. On the bullet hits the ball. [20:13.680 --> 20:20.680] Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call in number is 512-646-1984 [20:20.680 --> 20:28.680] if you want to call in and get in line. Okay, I am talking with Roger and Wisconsin. Alright, [20:28.680 --> 20:36.680] Roger, please continue. Yes, I kind of thought that it was a possible violation of civil [20:36.680 --> 20:42.680] rights, especially the... No, they provided you with counsel which you admit was in the [20:42.680 --> 20:47.680] human presence. The fact that he didn't do things the way you may have liked is a totally [20:47.680 --> 20:55.680] different issue. Okay, but I had never met him before or spoke with him or anything. [20:55.680 --> 21:00.680] Okay, what's your point? Preliminary. You ever see the show Night Court? [21:00.680 --> 21:07.680] Yes. Okay. None of those people ever met their attorney either until they were standing in [21:07.680 --> 21:14.680] front of Harry there in the courtroom. The attorney is there to address the facts to [21:14.680 --> 21:19.680] the court, the facts as they appear in the record. If there's more than what is in the [21:19.680 --> 21:23.680] record that the attorney needs to make the court aware of, then you need to make sure [21:23.680 --> 21:28.680] they know that, which means talk to them, which means you need to ask the court for [21:28.680 --> 21:33.680] time to talk with the attorney about the facts of the case because there's something the [21:33.680 --> 21:37.680] attorney may not be aware of because it's not in the record. Did you do that? [21:37.680 --> 21:44.680] Yes, that's exactly what I tried to do. What do you mean tried to do? [21:44.680 --> 21:49.680] Well, I said excuse me and I was stifled immediately by the judge. He wouldn't allow [21:49.680 --> 21:56.680] me to speak, so I heard that as being denied access to the court as a civil rights [21:56.680 --> 22:00.680] violation... Well, it's not denial of access to the court because you have counsel. [22:00.680 --> 22:05.680] The problem is whether or not counsel can be shown to be factually knowledgeable of [22:05.680 --> 22:11.680] your case before appearing in court on your behalf. Normally, that's why the charges [22:11.680 --> 22:21.680] have to be read and before anybody goes into any discussion. [22:21.680 --> 22:31.680] I interrupted during the charges being read. That's true. The problem was I didn't [22:31.680 --> 22:39.680] use the word objection, apparently, and I said excuse me, but I'm not a lost graduate [22:39.680 --> 22:47.680] student. It was the first case of this attorney. He just got out of law school. [22:47.680 --> 22:54.680] I just really holy about that. I had a criminal complaint which would have been [22:54.680 --> 23:03.680] appearing completely on the whole rest of the case more or less due to using a wrong [23:03.680 --> 23:17.680] verbage or something like the word objection versus excuse me, your honor. As I was [23:17.680 --> 23:23.680] led to know that you could file a criminal complaint with the prosecutor or a judge, [23:23.680 --> 23:27.680] so I was to take the opportunity to do this. [23:27.680 --> 23:34.680] It's not something that's normally done in the middle of your own prosecution. [23:34.680 --> 23:37.680] I didn't get that. [23:37.680 --> 23:43.680] It's not something that's usually done in the middle of your own prosecution. [23:43.680 --> 23:49.680] Right. Like I said, I'm not a lost school graduate. I'm a graduate of a technical [23:49.680 --> 23:52.680] college, yes, but not... [23:52.680 --> 23:58.680] Think of it kind of like this, not trying to compare you to it, but just as an [23:58.680 --> 24:05.680] aside, a burglar caught by the police in the middle of a burglary is not going to [24:05.680 --> 24:09.680] be given much of an opportunity to report another burglary. [24:09.680 --> 24:21.680] Yes, I can understand that. It's just based on working with an attorney as a [24:21.680 --> 24:28.680] mechanic, rather. I've learned one thing, the Nippon and Nippon scenario. [24:28.680 --> 24:37.680] I was searching drastically to find... Since he wasn't around, he had died a [24:37.680 --> 24:44.680] couple years prior. I was drastically searching for this Nippon and Nippon [24:44.680 --> 24:50.680] type of a thing, and I've even heard you guys mention something to the effect so [24:50.680 --> 24:55.680] it doesn't get too out of hand, which it ended up doing. [24:55.680 --> 25:02.680] But I guess you kind of answered the question. [25:02.680 --> 25:09.680] I do have another statement about traffic with those traffic lightcams. [25:09.680 --> 25:11.680] Which is? [25:11.680 --> 25:21.680] Well, I had gotten a letter in the mail at a stop sign or whatever. [25:21.680 --> 25:30.680] It wasn't a light along O'Haraport, and what had happened was I looked at my rear [25:30.680 --> 25:35.680] rear view mirror and another car behind me at a high rate of speed was coming up [25:35.680 --> 25:41.680] and the ground was wet. It wasn't snow or ice, but it did rain. [25:41.680 --> 25:51.680] I actually had stopped momentarily before the stop line, and I actually had to get [25:51.680 --> 25:56.680] out of the way to avoid a rear-end collision, and I stated it in my appeal. [25:56.680 --> 26:06.680] They gave me a chance to appeal, and they reviewed the CCV cam, and they said, [26:06.680 --> 26:12.680] no, but the other guy behind you stopped, and I'm like, well, I really think that [26:12.680 --> 26:18.680] they should have, first of all, an approach speed like they have a radar gun [26:18.680 --> 26:24.680] that they could compare to, and secondly, have another camera to monitor the traffic [26:24.680 --> 26:31.680] behind people that are coming to those stops in order to understand that some [26:31.680 --> 26:42.680] people have to take evasive driving reactions to avoid a catastrophic rear-end [26:42.680 --> 26:52.680] collision. I ended up paying, and some people commented and said that all the [26:52.680 --> 27:00.680] proceeds go to the country of Israel like they sell the concessions or the parking [27:00.680 --> 27:09.680] meters to different countries like France or something in Chicago and stuff like that. [27:09.680 --> 27:14.680] Okay, so is that what you got? [27:14.680 --> 27:15.680] Yes. [27:15.680 --> 27:21.680] Okay, well, I appreciate you calling in, and I hope what I said helps. [27:21.680 --> 27:24.680] You understand better how the process works. [27:24.680 --> 27:30.680] Yeah, well, it would have to do with the accuser aspect a bit. [27:30.680 --> 27:37.680] I also mentioned that I'm, you know, whereas a camera is constitutionally or [27:37.680 --> 27:44.680] whatever, well, it's just like pay the fine, be or whatever, and otherwise we'll [27:44.680 --> 27:47.680] suspend your driver's license. [27:47.680 --> 27:52.680] And I've heard you respond to that on your show before those things. [27:52.680 --> 27:57.680] I was just wondering if you had any comment with relation to that. [27:57.680 --> 28:00.680] Well, my comment's always been one and the same. [28:00.680 --> 28:10.680] I don't need a license to travel on the road, so what are you going to suspend? [28:10.680 --> 28:13.680] Well, I guess we could phrase it another way. [28:13.680 --> 28:19.680] You can avoid being pulled over and handcuffed and brought to jail and then [28:19.680 --> 28:24.680] posed a bond, you know, go through that procedure, I guess. [28:24.680 --> 28:28.680] That's, it's, you're not, okay, let me, let me be very clear. [28:28.680 --> 28:33.680] You're not going to avoid being pulled over short of evading the cops to begin with, [28:33.680 --> 28:38.680] which if you're in your own car with a license plate would be very stupid to do [28:38.680 --> 28:42.680] if they ever got close enough to actually read it. [28:42.680 --> 28:47.680] Because if you think they're not going to come knocking on your door and trying [28:47.680 --> 28:52.680] to say you were the one behind the wheel of the car, and if they got close enough [28:52.680 --> 28:56.680] to read it, they quite possibly got close enough to get a picture of your face in [28:56.680 --> 29:02.680] the mirror or from oncoming traffic or something, then you're in more trouble. [29:02.680 --> 29:09.680] So I don't know what you mean by avoiding a traffic stop. [29:09.680 --> 29:16.680] Well, in response to your statement that if I, if I don't need a driver's license, [29:16.680 --> 29:19.680] what do I care if you suspend it for? [29:19.680 --> 29:26.680] And the way that I feel that their mentality is, is, okay, [29:26.680 --> 29:31.680] don't pay the fine, most suspend your license, and you'll just get pulled over [29:31.680 --> 29:35.680] and hauled into jail and posed a bond and go through the court proceeding. [29:35.680 --> 29:37.680] You know, that's their mentality. [29:37.680 --> 29:41.680] Well, when it's all about the money, it's always their mentality. [29:41.680 --> 29:46.680] And there's, this is actually something that goes beyond money for them, [29:46.680 --> 29:48.680] which I've touched on before. [29:48.680 --> 29:54.680] This, this licensing scheme has a lot of hidden governmental benefits, [29:54.680 --> 29:57.680] but a lot of detriments to us. [29:57.680 --> 29:59.680] All right, I got to take a break. [30:01.680 --> 30:06.680] Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving [30:06.680 --> 30:08.680] under the bloody alcohol image. [30:08.680 --> 30:12.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers [30:12.680 --> 30:15.680] and a government cover-up in a moment. [30:15.680 --> 30:17.680] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.680 --> 30:20.680] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.680 --> 30:25.680] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.680 --> 30:27.680] So protect your rights. [30:27.680 --> 30:30.680] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.680 --> 30:33.680] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.680 --> 30:36.680] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:36.680 --> 30:40.680] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.680 --> 30:43.680] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.680 --> 30:46.680] Ever hear the term fine farming? [30:46.680 --> 30:49.680] It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue, [30:49.680 --> 30:53.680] and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida. [30:53.680 --> 30:57.680] This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists [30:57.680 --> 30:59.680] for DUI violations. [30:59.680 --> 31:03.680] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. [31:03.680 --> 31:07.680] State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing. [31:07.680 --> 31:11.680] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors [31:11.680 --> 31:13.680] not to document the problem. [31:13.680 --> 31:16.680] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, [31:16.680 --> 31:18.680] but now that the cover-up has been exposed, [31:18.680 --> 31:21.680] perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier. [31:21.680 --> 31:23.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:23.680 --> 31:30.680] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:54.680 --> 31:57.680] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [31:57.680 --> 32:25.680] Don't go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [32:27.680 --> 32:32.680] Our original section with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [32:32.680 --> 32:36.680] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.680 --> 32:41.320] and valuable material by going to rulelawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering [32:41.320 --> 32:44.880] now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus [32:44.880 --> 32:49.200] the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents [32:49.200 --> 32:52.480] and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help [32:52.480 --> 32:57.080] of this material from rulelawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the [32:57.080 --> 33:02.680] free society we all want and deserve. [33:02.680 --> 33:09.680] All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. [33:32.680 --> 33:40.680] The call in number 512-646-1984. Let's see if we can wrap up Roger here. [33:40.680 --> 33:42.680] All right, Roger, anything else? [33:42.680 --> 33:49.800] Yeah, you know, Eddie, I had noticed from years ago and working with this turning being [33:49.800 --> 33:56.680] a good friend and everything and I had a 69 charger at the time and I just put a new motor [33:56.680 --> 34:05.160] in with a high performance clutch pack and everything and I got like five tickets, you [34:05.160 --> 34:14.040] know, which is easy to rack up in the city, you know, and when I went to court, basically [34:14.040 --> 34:20.920] my attorney goes up there and he's one of the best, you know, and rails off some things. [34:20.920 --> 34:26.920] But after listening to your show and everything, I wouldn't doubt it's based on this USC and [34:26.920 --> 34:33.960] your honor, my client isn't a commercial driver or whatever and they basically don't [34:33.960 --> 34:40.520] have jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction, is it? [34:40.520 --> 34:49.880] And to that effect, you know, basically he's falling under that USC code. So in a lot of [34:49.880 --> 34:54.600] these attorneys, it's almost like a secret to them and that's where they make their big [34:54.600 --> 35:01.560] money is to be able to get traffic tickets off or passenger privately owned passenger [35:01.560 --> 35:10.440] vehicles because they cite that law and it's kind of like an inner secret to the lawyer [35:10.440 --> 35:16.080] industry or something. Am I correct possibly? [35:16.080 --> 35:21.040] I don't know. I don't know what law you're referring to and or anything like that. So [35:21.040 --> 35:24.680] I don't know what it is you're wanting me to say to that. [35:24.680 --> 35:34.720] Right. Yeah, just like kind of generally, you know, that's what the attorneys have done [35:34.720 --> 35:40.320] the research, the attorneys are going to realize that most state laws are either directly based [35:40.320 --> 35:47.080] on the federal statutes under Title 49 under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act or they [35:47.080 --> 35:52.160] were enacted by the state at the behest of the federal government saying, we're going [35:52.160 --> 35:57.000] to blackmail you into enforcing our rules and regulations within your state by withholding [35:57.000 --> 36:03.720] highway funds if you won't do what we want done, which is itself unconstitutional on [36:03.720 --> 36:08.320] multiple grounds. One, the federal government is not supposed to be divvying out money to [36:08.320 --> 36:15.600] the states for highway funds. Nowhere is that an enumerated power. Second, the federal government [36:15.600 --> 36:19.880] is not allowed to blackmail the states and to comply with anything it wants because the [36:19.880 --> 36:28.360] states don't work for it. And third, it violates the rights of the individual to move freely [36:28.360 --> 36:36.400] about the several states of the union without government permission to do so. And that doesn't [36:36.400 --> 36:40.200] even begin to touch on all the other things I was talking about that are detrimental to [36:40.200 --> 36:49.240] us because of programs exactly like this. My second motion. Okay, so as far as what [36:49.240 --> 36:54.160] you're asking, I don't know exactly what it is you're asking. As far as the position [36:54.160 --> 37:03.160] I hold on it, well, there you go. Yes, it was just a general kind of a thought feeling [37:03.160 --> 37:09.840] that I had with concern to how these attorneys, they grant a lot of... The attorney is most [37:09.840 --> 37:15.760] likely citing law that they know for a fact is controlling in that state from the federal [37:15.760 --> 37:20.480] government and therefore eliminates the state's ability to enforce against someone that doesn't [37:20.480 --> 37:25.960] fall under federal law, which is exactly the same thing that I'm doing with the state law [37:25.960 --> 37:31.840] because the state law here in Texas is very clear it doesn't apply to the general public. [37:31.840 --> 37:36.960] If you just know where to look to find all the pieces that prove it. [37:36.960 --> 37:44.560] Right, right. Well, Eddie, thank you so much for taking my call and you have a fantastic [37:44.560 --> 37:52.640] show and you're quite knowledgeable and I wish everybody knew about this. They should [37:52.640 --> 37:57.680] teach this in high school, really, as I've heard on jurisdiction areas as well. [37:57.680 --> 38:02.360] Well, that would interfere with the attorney's ability to lie to the public and steal their [38:02.360 --> 38:08.880] money if everybody knew what they knew. That's a fact. Thank you, sir. [38:08.880 --> 38:13.240] Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. Yes, bye. Bye-bye. [38:13.240 --> 38:20.160] All right, now we have Angel in Texas. Angel, what do you got? [38:20.160 --> 38:30.080] Hi, Eddie. Hi. Hi. I'm sorry, I wasn't speaking. Hello, how are you doing? [38:30.080 --> 38:37.400] I'm doing good, and you? Good, good, good. Do you remember me talking before? [38:37.400 --> 38:43.080] I remember the sound of your voice over the radio, yes, and that we have talk, though [38:43.080 --> 38:47.240] I couldn't tell you off the top of my head about what specific subject. [38:47.240 --> 38:57.360] I was supposed to send you an email, just being busy because of a traffic ground violation, [38:57.360 --> 39:02.800] you know, jaywalking, blah, blah, blah. Oh, okay, yeah, the jaywalking case from way [39:02.800 --> 39:08.280] back when? Yes, and I have submitted a motion based on [39:08.280 --> 39:13.920] your arguments, you know, with all the backup information you had and all that stuff. So [39:13.920 --> 39:22.320] it turns out that that motion has worked for me very, very, very well. [39:22.320 --> 39:31.760] Last year in September, I was stopped on a traffic violation on Highway 10, going towards [39:31.760 --> 39:39.280] Houston, and I wasn't speeding. I wasn't doing anything. I was just on the left lane [39:39.280 --> 39:47.880] going about a mile or two faster than the speed limit. And this guy, one state trooper, [39:47.880 --> 39:54.520] you know, he's, you know, checking for, I don't know what he's checking for. And anyway, [39:54.520 --> 39:59.240] I think I smelled good for him. He just came behind me and put his lights on, whatever [39:59.240 --> 40:03.600] stopped me. Then he, you know, he stopped me because I was on the left lane for too [40:03.600 --> 40:13.240] long to explain that, hey, man, I'm not in transportation. I'm just a traveler in my [40:13.240 --> 40:20.280] private car, and I'm just heading to work. And, you know, he kept on his stuff, blah, [40:20.280 --> 40:29.960] blah, blah. Anyway, the whole thing turned out that he was a canine unit. [40:29.960 --> 40:33.720] He wanted to do it. He just wanted somebody to direct sniff on. [40:33.720 --> 40:44.200] Yes. He did that. And a long story short, they made out, they fabricated evidence, and [40:44.200 --> 40:48.640] they took me to jail that day, you know, even though I asked to be taken to the magistrate [40:48.640 --> 40:56.520] and all that stuff. They had me in jail for 24 hours, and they impounded my car. And anyway, [40:56.520 --> 41:01.800] I had to borrow money to, you know, to get my car out. [41:01.800 --> 41:11.400] What did they arrest you for? They said a possession of marijuana, two ounces or less, [41:11.400 --> 41:18.040] which I didn't have. I didn't have. I didn't even smell like marijuana. I hadn't even smoked [41:18.040 --> 41:23.480] marijuana that day. I was just heading to work. I had my uniform. I had just picked up [41:23.480 --> 41:29.000] some parts from the parts stores because I'm a mechanic to take to the shop and stuff. [41:29.000 --> 41:34.840] But, you know, I was just in my regular day. And this guy made up, you know, I mean, it's [41:34.840 --> 41:44.800] all on video. It's all recorded, at least on their cameras. And anyways, they bailed [41:44.800 --> 41:55.880] myself out. They sent me for court in October. And then they postponed it again in January. [41:55.880 --> 42:04.040] And when I went in January, the 7th, they just called me and they said the prosecution [42:04.040 --> 42:10.280] has declined to prosecute. The state has declined to prosecute. They dropped all your charges. [42:10.280 --> 42:15.680] Yeah. Now what you have to do is file a written petition to the prosecutor demanding that [42:15.680 --> 42:21.080] they expunge that arrest from your record. Otherwise, it'll be there every time somebody [42:21.080 --> 42:27.720] ever looks you up. Okay. But I also like to, you know, pursue [42:27.720 --> 42:34.760] a lawsuit, you know, because if the circumstances had been different, they couldn't have ruined [42:34.760 --> 42:40.600] my day. I mean, you know, if I had been a little bit more upset that they could even [42:40.600 --> 42:45.640] gotten shot or something. Okay. What do you have in your favor to prove [42:45.640 --> 42:53.160] that they set you up and falsified evidence? Well, first of all, they dismissed the case. [42:53.160 --> 43:01.960] That's not proof they falsified the evidence. Oh, well, the charge they made, you know, [43:01.960 --> 43:05.960] the video. Okay. The charge itself is not proof they falsified [43:05.960 --> 43:11.200] the evidence supporting the charge. You said they had two ounces of, they charged you with [43:11.200 --> 43:18.440] two ounces of marijuana or less. What did they use to say this is marijuana? [43:18.440 --> 43:26.520] I had a small container with just a little bit, not even the gram or less, not even, [43:26.520 --> 43:30.680] I mean, I have forgotten the stuff was there and I didn't give them any permission to search [43:30.680 --> 43:36.360] my car. Okay. So how is that falsified evidence since that is two grams or less? [43:38.040 --> 43:41.800] No, no, it's not even a gram or less. It doesn't, you've not listened to me. [43:42.520 --> 43:49.400] Two grams or less, which covers anything less than two grams, even if it's one billionth of a [43:49.400 --> 43:53.880] gram. Okay. Hang on just a second. Hang on just a second. Let me take this break. [43:53.880 --> 44:02.680] All right, folks, we'll be right back. Y'all hold on. Are you the plaintiff or defendant [44:02.680 --> 44:08.760] in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to [44:08.760 --> 44:16.840] understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, [44:16.840 --> 44:21.720] know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for [44:21.720 --> 44:28.920] yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course. And now you can too. Jurisdictionary was [44:28.920 --> 44:35.400] created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a [44:35.400 --> 44:40.840] lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices [44:40.840 --> 44:47.720] that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [44:47.720 --> 44:54.920] forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflongradio.com [44:54.920 --> 45:00.040] and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:01.400 --> 45:06.280] I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so [45:06.280 --> 45:10.920] addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth bank. I'd be lost without [45:10.920 --> 45:15.800] logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. And I'd love to volunteer as a show [45:15.800 --> 45:20.360] producer, but I'm a bit of a bloodite and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it [45:20.360 --> 45:26.120] all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything [45:26.120 --> 45:30.920] from Amazon, you can help logos. You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing [45:30.920 --> 45:38.360] you do is clear your cookies. Now go to logosregualnetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and book [45:38.360 --> 45:44.600] market. Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [45:44.600 --> 45:49.960] Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon [45:49.960 --> 45:57.000] Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. [45:57.000 --> 46:15.240] Thank you so much. We are logos. Happy holidays, logos. [46:27.000 --> 46:42.360] All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call it number 512-646-1984. [46:42.360 --> 46:50.040] And we are talking with Angel in Texas. All right, Angel, go ahead. Now you have two grams or less. [46:50.040 --> 46:59.160] In this case, the or less is what is applicable here, not the two grams. So they found that, [46:59.160 --> 47:06.200] and you did have that, which you are admitting that you had. However, they dismissed the case. [47:06.200 --> 47:15.320] Now when did this occur? This January on the 7th. That's when they dismissed it. [47:15.320 --> 47:21.960] Right. Right after the state enacted laws making possession of certain types of hemp [47:21.960 --> 47:29.000] and certain amounts of marijuana less than a certain weight, absolutely legal. What would [47:29.000 --> 47:38.280] they prosecute you for? The question is, was that law active when you were originally arrested? [47:38.280 --> 47:47.080] If the answer is no. By the way, did they test this and have it come up positive with a drug test [47:47.080 --> 47:55.480] kit? No, no, no, no. Then they have no way of proving what it was. They have no way of proving [47:55.480 --> 48:00.760] what it was. And if the only thing they had to rely on was a drug test kit, you could have challenged [48:00.760 --> 48:06.200] that very easily as being highly unreliable. And if the amount is as small as what you say, [48:06.200 --> 48:09.000] the possibility is they wouldn't have had enough to test it again. [48:10.840 --> 48:17.080] Well, what I was relying on is on the subject matter jurisdiction because from the beginning, [48:17.080 --> 48:26.040] you see, I have a prior conviction. So to me, when, you know, a police officer, whatever, [48:26.040 --> 48:33.000] you know, they approach me. So I identify myself so that I don't, you know, so they know I'm not, [48:33.000 --> 48:38.600] you know, in any threat or anything like that. So when they stopped me and they asked me for [48:38.600 --> 48:44.600] driver license, I said, I showed my driver license and they asked me for insurance. [48:45.800 --> 48:48.120] What did they say they originally stopped you for? [48:49.560 --> 48:55.000] I said, traffic, for traffic, because I was going on the left lane and I was on the left [48:55.000 --> 49:00.440] lane for too long. That made up excuse. But I told the guy, I told the cop, I'm showing my [49:00.440 --> 49:06.760] driver license for the purpose of identification only, not because I'm engaged [49:06.760 --> 49:13.080] on the regulated activity of driving. I'm not driving, I'm traveling in my private car. [49:13.640 --> 49:19.080] So these driving staff, transportation staff, I'm not under jurisdiction. [49:19.720 --> 49:26.360] So that's what I told, that's all on camera, you know, on the camera and all the conversations, [49:26.360 --> 49:31.320] you know, when they went into my car, I said, you don't have concession or permission to go [49:31.320 --> 49:36.840] into my car. You cannot search my car unless you present me a warrant stating the cost, [49:37.640 --> 49:44.360] the probable cost of such search, which they didn't and they refused to. [49:45.240 --> 49:50.040] They refused to read the Mami Rondo rights, even though I asked, I mean, these guys, I mean, [49:50.040 --> 49:54.040] they broke everything. I mean, all I did was asking questions, you know, too. [49:54.040 --> 49:59.560] And since I knew the cameras were rolling, there's three or four, five of them according to them, [49:59.560 --> 50:04.280] and every single one of them, they broke, you know, they did not follow procedures, [50:04.280 --> 50:09.320] they took me directly to jail and all that stuff. I said, like, when you're violating the law, [50:09.320 --> 50:14.760] we hear, and this is not correct, and they're still not, not, not, not listened. And, [50:16.520 --> 50:21.960] and then they made up this charge, you know, that they found that they had two answers for [50:21.960 --> 50:29.720] less. Dude, I didn't have it. I'm very sure I didn't have it. You know, whatever container [50:29.720 --> 50:35.560] they found it, there wasn't a container in my backpack that could hold any, any, that amount. [50:35.560 --> 50:41.320] So, you know, they made that up to legitimize their, their, their search, their, you know, their [50:41.320 --> 50:48.040] charges. And then when it came to the bail, you know, I said, I'm bailing myself out. [50:48.040 --> 50:54.840] I'm not going to sign for myself. I'm not going to pay bail. And so I signed myself out. And [50:54.840 --> 51:00.280] the later, you know, the second time I went to court, that's when they, they said, I have the [51:00.280 --> 51:13.000] paper here where it says the, the, it says the county attorney's office has declined to prosecute [51:13.000 --> 51:20.120] in your caviar for the charges listed above that occurred under about 10 to, or, you know, [51:20.120 --> 51:27.000] about the 10, 10, 16, 2019. Okay. Well, that's all well and good. And I'm glad for you as far as [51:27.000 --> 51:33.480] that working out in your favor, but I'm still trying to figure out where you're going to make [51:33.480 --> 51:41.480] the claim that they fabricated the evidence. I don't know how you're going to prove that when [51:41.480 --> 51:46.760] you admitted that there was something in the car for them to find, regardless of the amount of it. [51:47.880 --> 51:52.280] No, I didn't admit to, I didn't admit to anything. I didn't, when they said it'll [51:52.280 --> 51:58.360] fund this on them. No, I'm just saying, you just did to me, whether you did to them or not, [51:58.360 --> 52:05.000] is not the issue. You told me that the fact is that they, that I had this and I forgot it was [52:05.000 --> 52:13.720] in there. That's an admission that it was in there. Is it not? Yes. Oh, yes. Okay. So [52:17.720 --> 52:23.240] wait a minute. How did they fabricate the amount when they said two grams or less? [52:24.520 --> 52:32.280] Two ounces or less. Okay. Regardless, where is the or less not going to cover whatever amount [52:32.280 --> 52:46.120] you had? Well, okay. Then I might have misinstated that they fabricated a probable cause maybe? [52:46.120 --> 52:50.840] I don't know, but the fabrication of probable cause would have had to have come at the time of the [52:50.840 --> 52:58.120] stop. Yeah, they did that. Okay. When you said you were in the left lane too long, what does that [52:58.120 --> 53:05.800] even mean? Was this a four lane highway? Two lane highway. It's on 10 on Seguin, you know. Okay. So [53:05.800 --> 53:12.760] how were you, left lanes oncoming traffic then? No, I was on the highway, left lane passing lane. [53:12.760 --> 53:19.320] We know it's the passing lane, slower traffic on the right, faster traffic on the left. Okay. [53:19.320 --> 53:26.840] It says, the sign says, left lane for passing traffic only, which I was. It's a four lane [53:26.840 --> 53:34.760] divided highway, right? There's two on the other side, two on this side, right? Okay. Yeah, [53:34.760 --> 53:39.720] no, he made that up, man. He made that up because what happened was that I looked at him when I [53:39.720 --> 53:45.720] was passing him by, I looked at him and I just kept going. And then he came behind me and he [53:45.720 --> 53:52.360] followed me for at least two miles. For at least a mile, I mean, he was checking my place. From [53:52.360 --> 53:58.120] the beginning, he was already breaking the law, right? Without searching features, you know, [53:59.320 --> 54:05.400] without a warrant. Well, here's what I'm pretty sure happened. No warrant. Well, here's what I'm [54:05.400 --> 54:10.920] pretty sure happened in order for them to fabricate the excuse to pull you over. Since they can make [54:10.920 --> 54:16.440] up anything they want, absent dashcam evidence proving that no such incident occurred before [54:16.440 --> 54:22.680] they initiated the stop. What he did do was, yes, he ran your plate. Yes, it came up with your [54:22.680 --> 54:28.120] information. Yes, it showed a prior conviction. Yes, that's the basis he used to go on a fishing [54:28.120 --> 54:33.960] expedition and to initiate the traffic stop. Mm-hmm. That's exactly what he did. Mm-hmm. [54:33.960 --> 54:41.560] But now we're back to the same question. How are you going to prove it? See, the thing is, [54:41.560 --> 54:48.040] this is without timestamped video showing when he was running your information in conjunction with [54:48.040 --> 54:52.760] when the traffic stop was performed. They can always say they didn't look you up until after [54:52.760 --> 55:00.280] the fact. So you would have to match everything up according to timestamp on the video. If there [55:00.280 --> 55:06.760] is any video of the actual stop, you then have to match up the timestamps on the searches and [55:06.760 --> 55:11.720] everything in their computer system to show that he was searching before he ever had any [55:11.720 --> 55:18.120] cause to pull you over, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Okay. That's all stuff [55:18.120 --> 55:27.080] you would have to prove in order to prove lack of probable cause, absent proof of transportation. [55:28.840 --> 55:35.240] But, you see, I don't want to reverse the burden and prove for me to prove this. [55:35.240 --> 55:38.840] I want to put it on them because they're the ones who are supposed to prove it. [55:38.840 --> 55:43.880] You have nothing. No, you can't sue them and then say they have the burden of proof. [55:44.920 --> 55:48.920] We're talking about you suing them. They've already dropped the criminal charges, [55:48.920 --> 55:53.320] so they no longer have a burden of proof against you because they're not prosecuting you. [55:53.320 --> 55:58.360] You're talking about suing them. Hence, the burden of proof now lies on you. [55:58.360 --> 56:05.880] Well, what I'm going is for the, I mean, I'm skipping all this stuff. I'm going for the [56:05.880 --> 56:12.440] false incarceration, all right? False imprisonment. They didn't have no jurisdiction, [56:12.440 --> 56:17.160] yet they still put me to jail. You see, they still put me to jail. Well, the thing is, [56:17.160 --> 56:21.960] is they were required absent some accident circumstances to take you immediately before [56:21.960 --> 56:28.440] a magistrate. However, that is the way it's written in the transportation code. They didn't [56:28.440 --> 56:33.560] arrest you for a transportation code offense. They arrested you for a penal code offense. [56:35.960 --> 56:42.920] Okay, okay. Okay, so there's two different things right there. Okay. But they started with the [56:42.920 --> 56:50.280] transportation. Irrelevant. Irrelevant. The only thing you can prove goes back to everything [56:50.280 --> 56:56.680] I'm talking about, that the original stop itself was illegal. That puts the burden of proof on you. [56:56.680 --> 57:01.000] That means you've got to match up all the records just like I started to say. [57:02.200 --> 57:07.720] Okay. So how do, how do I go about getting those records? [57:07.720 --> 57:14.360] Well, you would have to file discovery and you're probably not going to be allowed to have it [57:14.360 --> 57:19.480] unless you actually file suit, which means you're spending more money to file a suit. You may not [57:19.480 --> 57:26.040] have any way to prove and prosecute. Because I guarantee you the first thing that's going to [57:26.040 --> 57:31.480] happen when you file a suit against a cop, any cop, is they're going to file a 12B6 for immunity [57:32.200 --> 57:40.520] and failure to stay to claim. Okay. Which means you're going to be taking your time right off [57:40.520 --> 57:46.360] the bat to sit down and address every issue they raise in the dismissal motion they're going to [57:46.360 --> 57:52.920] make to the court to say he has no grounds to sue. And the lawyer has qualified immunity because he [57:52.920 --> 58:04.680] was just doing his job. Okay. But on the gathering of evidence, you said file a demotion for [58:04.680 --> 58:10.360] discovery, but that's only when you can file a motion for pre-trial discovery, but you have [58:10.360 --> 58:16.120] to file a notice of intent to sue to do that, which starts the clock on your statute of limitations [58:16.120 --> 58:31.480] to follow through. Because right now you've got a year or two years versus you file that notice, [58:31.480 --> 58:42.920] you've got six months. Okay. What's your wages? Okay. Hang on a second, Angel. I got to take [58:42.920 --> 58:47.080] a break. We'll finish this up on the other side. Folks, y'all hang on. We shall be right back. [58:50.280 --> 58:55.880] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.880 --> 59:01.880] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:01.880 --> 59:06.040] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.040 --> 59:13.400] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.400 --> 59:19.480] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound [59:19.480 --> 59:24.680] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the [59:24.680 --> 59:30.680] word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free [59:30.680 --> 59:36.840] recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours [59:36.840 --> 59:47.800] just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.800 --> 01:00:04.600] That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:00:06.520 --> 01:00:12.680] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals Gold $1,429 [01:00:12.680 --> 01:00:21.320] an oz silver $16.45 an oz copper $2.75 an oz oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel Brent [01:00:21.320 --> 01:00:31.640] crude $62.47 a barrel and cryptos in order of market cap Bitcoin Core $10,566.52 Ethereum $227.26 [01:00:31.640 --> 01:00:41.640] XRP Ripple $0.33 white coin $100.31 and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin. [01:00:46.120 --> 01:00:52.600] Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a timed suitcase bomb was detonated [01:00:52.600 --> 01:00:58.440] on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing 10 and [01:00:58.440 --> 01:01:07.640] entering 40 today in history and recent news since the governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill [01:01:07.640 --> 01:01:13.320] 1325 legalizing heaven attacks law back in June county prosecutors around the state including [01:01:13.320 --> 01:01:17.960] Houston, Austin and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing [01:01:17.960 --> 01:01:22.920] to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment [01:01:22.920 --> 01:01:28.280] to test the or for THC Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this [01:01:28.280 --> 01:01:33.160] month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the [01:01:33.160 --> 01:01:38.040] law Mr Abbott and other state officials including the attorney general stipulated in a letter that [01:01:38.040 --> 01:01:43.000] county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas [01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:49.800] and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well as other cities too [01:01:49.800 --> 01:01:56.280] like the district attorney in El Paso Kyman Esparza a Democrat who also stated earlier this month [01:01:56.280 --> 01:02:01.960] that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso [01:02:01.960 --> 01:02:06.920] however the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr Brandon Ball an assistant public defender [01:02:06.920 --> 01:02:11.400] in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes something [01:02:11.400 --> 01:02:16.120] illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone is charged with something [01:02:16.120 --> 01:02:25.320] the test matches what they're charged with a paper by Tulane University identified a five and a [01:02:25.320 --> 01:02:31.240] half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico the specimen being [01:02:31.240 --> 01:02:36.360] only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way [01:02:36.360 --> 01:02:41.960] back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean according to the university paper the shark secretes a [01:02:41.960 --> 01:02:49.080] luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and pray [01:02:49.080 --> 01:03:16.200] who may be drawn into the glow this is work roadie with your loadout for July 22nd 2019 [01:03:19.880 --> 01:03:36.760] all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio the call in number five one two six four [01:03:36.760 --> 01:03:42.680] six 1984 we got an hour left in the show and we are talking with angel in Texas all right angel go [01:03:42.680 --> 01:03:58.840] ahead uh hb 1325 passed on the july 10th 2019 okay it passed on july 10th and you were arrested when [01:03:58.840 --> 01:04:19.400] okay well that depends on what the law that you're referring to actually says I haven't actually [01:04:19.400 --> 01:04:24.440] read it though I know that they enacted one I just don't know when and exactly what it said [01:04:24.440 --> 01:04:31.240] because I haven't read it but if it specifically covers the activities and amounts that you were [01:04:31.240 --> 01:04:39.240] engaged in when they arrested you then yeah it's absolutely a false arrest and you can't you can [01:04:39.240 --> 01:04:44.600] that's all you've got to prove the arrest was false the charges were false because the cops [01:04:44.600 --> 01:04:52.040] were improperly educated on the law and improperly trained on how to enforce the law and oh man [01:04:52.040 --> 01:05:00.600] and they they they act like kids man they act like kids with guns well they are mentally speaking [01:05:01.960 --> 01:05:09.240] yeah yeah they are like I mean even when I called for the for the supervisors he was even worse [01:05:09.240 --> 01:05:15.480] he was more retarded than the two of the ones I don't know well now all you need to do is find [01:05:15.480 --> 01:05:20.920] you a retarded attorney that wants to sue somebody over in marijuana that's why I'm calling you buddy [01:05:20.920 --> 01:05:25.240] that one don't call me to get references to attorneys because I don't give references to [01:05:25.240 --> 01:05:31.880] attorneys no no no no no no the only thing I would give anybody in reference to an attorney [01:05:31.880 --> 01:05:41.240] is the grade of hemp rope to use to hang him with I don't I never have trust in attorneys and I [01:05:41.240 --> 01:05:49.240] never will I'll believe that the only person that can make the best fight for you freedom and [01:05:49.240 --> 01:05:57.400] liberty is yourself nobody else nobody else can do it because it's not the freedom or liberty [01:05:57.400 --> 01:06:06.360] that is in jeopardy you know so I wanted to ask for your guidance and if possible you know [01:06:07.400 --> 01:06:14.040] pay for your wages you know for you for your time but yeah I would like to know what steps to take [01:06:14.040 --> 01:06:21.960] but you know I'm not very eloquent or acquainted with all of these as you are but I'm willing to do [01:06:21.960 --> 01:06:29.080] the work I'm with like I have done in the past you know yeah well you did what was necessary [01:06:29.080 --> 01:06:35.880] before I'm sure you can do it this time too but remember suing a cop especially in state and federal [01:06:35.880 --> 01:06:47.560] courts that's that's a whole nother animal and they will fight back hard okay so well unless [01:06:47.560 --> 01:06:53.880] you know the ins and outs intimately you're taking a big risk if you're in if you intend to try to do [01:06:53.880 --> 01:07:09.000] that yourself okay I'm not saying you can't do it I know I know of people through time that have [01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:16.440] sued them without attorneys in one but that was different law and different people I'm not saying [01:07:16.440 --> 01:07:22.600] you can't do it I'm just saying you you have no clue what hard work and learning is until you start [01:07:22.600 --> 01:07:32.520] that little trip that's why I'm willing to compensate for weight you know because I know [01:07:33.640 --> 01:07:40.040] there is there is something in here there is a very something substantial in here and you know I [01:07:40.040 --> 01:07:46.680] would have let it go you know if I was not taken to jail but to go through the humiliation to be [01:07:46.680 --> 01:07:51.960] taken to jail get naked in front of a dude show them your butt hole so they can see that there [01:07:51.960 --> 01:08:01.640] is nothing in there no no I can't let go of that I can't you know they could they can ruin anybody's [01:08:01.640 --> 01:08:09.000] life anytime they want to they need to they need to stop they're not they're not immune you know [01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:21.240] it may be hard but not impossible well I love I wish you luck man okay can you can you call me back [01:08:21.240 --> 01:08:29.480] to this number Eddie uh well send me an email if you want to talk about it angel eddie dide at [01:08:29.480 --> 01:08:35.080] ruleoflawradio.com with your contact information in it I don't copy the phone numbers off of this [01:08:35.080 --> 01:08:43.960] this is not something I have direct access to except during showtime okay okay all right I'll [01:08:43.960 --> 01:08:52.840] send you an email okay all right thank you for your help and to everybody out there Eddie is the man [01:08:52.840 --> 01:09:00.440] in us what he's talking about so please compensate for his time and for the time he has invested [01:09:00.440 --> 01:09:06.760] in teaching us and educating us with all this information that otherwise we would have been [01:09:06.760 --> 01:09:13.080] completely oblivious to thank you very much Eddie well you're welcome Angel and thank you [01:09:13.080 --> 01:09:19.320] this has been an unpaid endorsement knobs thanks Angel I appreciate you you're welcome thank you [01:09:19.320 --> 01:09:26.200] all right bye bye okay now we have Chris in Texas Chris what can we do for you [01:09:28.200 --> 01:09:37.080] hi mr eddie howdy um back about month ago or last year on the 26th uh I was uh taking my [01:09:37.080 --> 01:09:45.240] niece to the store uh we got in our we got in our automobile looked out the windows looked out the [01:09:45.240 --> 01:09:53.320] back rear and rear mirror all was clear I put the car in drive I let it coast backwards it was on [01:09:53.320 --> 01:10:00.440] it was in a parking spot the spot is a little sloped down I'll tell you about maybe on maybe [01:10:00.440 --> 01:10:06.920] not even 10 degrees but slopes down to where they can move on its own power and I let it [01:10:06.920 --> 01:10:15.640] roll back in about two feet we feel a sudden so we get out we check everybody and it turns [01:10:15.640 --> 01:10:19.000] to there was a car parked behind us that we didn't see in our blind spot [01:10:21.400 --> 01:10:29.000] okay well the okay well the thing is I just recently went to court one of the things on the [01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:37.560] on the ticket was for parked without safety even though we never even left our own parking spot [01:10:39.960 --> 01:10:47.240] well that's something they can't prove what what are the specific elements of parked without [01:10:47.240 --> 01:10:55.560] safety I don't know and how did another car get close enough behind you to be legally parked itself [01:10:55.560 --> 01:11:03.320] well we live on private property we live on government housing okay that's not what I asked [01:11:03.320 --> 01:11:11.160] you though it was how did the other car park close enough behind you to get hit and them be deemed [01:11:11.160 --> 01:11:18.680] as having parked safely if you were already in a parking spot when they parked that other car [01:11:18.680 --> 01:11:28.360] exactly and and I don't know how it was parked safely I really don't but anyway I just went to [01:11:28.360 --> 01:11:35.480] court over the over the whole thing and with the motions from your from your course that I've [01:11:35.480 --> 01:11:44.040] learned about I gave to the I gave to the count I gave to the court assistant and when our case [01:11:44.040 --> 01:11:51.320] was called forward she passed them on to the actual judge who was who was uh who was seeing the case [01:11:53.240 --> 01:11:59.960] and she said that she was going since I still had stuff from last year that was going to go to court [01:11:59.960 --> 01:12:06.520] this year from the uh when I was arrested and on in August whoa whoa whoa wait a minute [01:12:06.520 --> 01:12:15.080] um okay stuff from last year is that traffic also yes uh no license no insurance [01:12:16.120 --> 01:12:18.760] did they ever file the criminal complaints in those cases [01:12:20.120 --> 01:12:23.480] they just now finally they finally just now sent them to my door [01:12:28.280 --> 01:12:32.520] okay so they finally they finally did they finally mailed those off and I finally got them [01:12:32.520 --> 01:12:40.520] this month about those cases that were like last year okay four or five months back last year [01:12:43.080 --> 01:12:52.280] so the and they are traffic related when did you get those I got those August eight August [01:12:53.720 --> 01:12:55.320] what day were they signed [01:12:55.320 --> 01:13:07.000] uh they were signed uh I was in jail for 10 hours they were signed the same day on the eighth [01:13:07.880 --> 01:13:09.800] wait a minute what I was told about the complaint [01:13:11.480 --> 01:13:16.680] okay but since it hadn't come across the city all right so they you got the tickets and thrown [01:13:16.680 --> 01:13:21.400] in jail on the same and the criminal complaints were done on the same day which was August [01:13:21.400 --> 01:13:25.960] August 20 August eight [01:13:30.360 --> 01:13:37.800] and they haven't gone to court yet no sir did you ever file a motion for a speedy trial [01:13:40.040 --> 01:13:46.360] we did trial motions and they wouldn't the court that's not what I asked you did you file a motion [01:13:46.360 --> 01:13:54.440] specifically for a speedy trial I did and they were rejected when I went through when I went [01:13:54.440 --> 01:14:02.040] they can't reject a speedy trial motion I need you to be absolutely certain you filed a motion [01:14:02.040 --> 01:14:07.880] for speedy trial well it was one of the motions I had meant to file with the court I took them [01:14:07.880 --> 01:14:16.120] down to court okay again again you say meant to file did you or didn't you file a motion [01:14:16.120 --> 01:14:23.960] for speedy trial I had the motion with me to file please please listen mr eddie I went down there to [01:14:23.960 --> 01:14:29.880] file the motions I was at the courthouse to file the motions and the when I went to talk to the [01:14:29.880 --> 01:14:36.360] court assistant at the time to file the motions she told me she would not file the motions [01:14:36.360 --> 01:14:45.000] unless I was intending to make a plea right did you record that no sir how many times do I have to [01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:48.760] say this folks and don't take this personally Chris but I'm fixing to chew your ass here [01:14:50.680 --> 01:15:00.440] do not ever go down to the courts and not record what you're doing this is exactly why [01:15:02.120 --> 01:15:08.120] you have no evidence they interfere with your right to file motions which is illegal you have no [01:15:08.120 --> 01:15:13.320] evidence that they denied you in a speedy trial by stopping you from filing those motions which [01:15:13.320 --> 01:15:19.720] is illegal but you can't prove it you see the problem here yes sir [01:15:23.240 --> 01:15:31.960] if you're going to talk to these public surface take a damned recorder and record everybody [01:15:33.240 --> 01:15:40.760] this is going to be you if you don't so now that you can't prove you filed a motion for a speedy [01:15:40.760 --> 01:15:46.840] trial because you didn't file a motion for a speedy trial because you didn't record the [01:15:46.840 --> 01:15:51.480] conversation where the clerk denied you access to the courts to file the motions in your own [01:15:51.480 --> 01:15:57.880] behalf unless you entered a plea first which is also illegal but which you also cannot prove [01:16:01.320 --> 01:16:07.640] you have a problem had you got that motion in you could have now filed a motion to dismiss [01:16:07.640 --> 01:16:14.040] for failure to provide a speedy trial and they would have had no choice but to grant it none not a zip [01:16:16.040 --> 01:16:23.160] you also filed no judicial conduct complaint and no complaint with the county or district [01:16:23.160 --> 01:16:27.240] attorney's office against the clerk of the court for denying you access to the courts and not [01:16:27.240 --> 01:16:39.240] taking your motions did you it's common sense if a public service breaking the law you need to [01:16:39.240 --> 01:16:44.360] complain to somebody where do you start it can't be with the judge it's allowing them to get away [01:16:44.360 --> 01:16:49.640] with it so where do you go next judicial conduct complaints and the district or county attorney's [01:16:49.640 --> 01:16:56.360] office to prosecute them for the crime right right there you go hang on a sec let me take this [01:16:56.360 --> 01:17:08.440] break we'll pick this up it's the 2019 logos radio network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway [01:17:08.440 --> 01:17:15.000] sponsored by central texas gunworks go to logosradio network dot com and enter to win any amount is [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:21.000] appreciated everything helps to keep us on the air from central texas gunworks the grand prize up [01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:27.800] for grabs is a spikes tactical ar-15 more prizes and sponsors to be announced every 25 [01:17:27.800 --> 01:17:34.120] dollar donation is a chance to win when you purchase randy kelton's ebook legal 101 you get [01:17:34.120 --> 01:17:39.960] four chances to win purchase eddie craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win if you've [01:17:39.960 --> 01:17:45.640] enjoyed the shows on logos radio network support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best [01:17:45.640 --> 01:17:51.480] quality programming on talk radio today we also accept bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and [01:17:51.480 --> 01:17:58.200] remember every 25 dollar donation is a chance to win go to logos radio network dot com for details [01:17:58.200 --> 01:18:05.000] and donate today are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuit [01:18:05.640 --> 01:18:11.400] stop debt collectors now with the michael mirris proven method michael mirris has won six cases in [01:18:11.400 --> 01:18:16.680] federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too you'll get step by step instructions [01:18:16.680 --> 01:18:21.960] in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what to do when [01:18:21.960 --> 01:18:27.480] contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt [01:18:27.480 --> 01:18:33.080] collectors out of your credit reports how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you [01:18:33.080 --> 01:18:39.000] to go away the michael mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors [01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:44.120] personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of law radio [01:18:44.120 --> 01:18:49.800] dot com and click on the blue michael mirris banner or email michael mirris at yahoo dot com [01:18:49.800 --> 01:18:59.080] that's rule of law radio dot com or email michael mirris at yahoo dot com to learn how to stop debt [01:18:59.080 --> 01:19:27.240] collectors now as i walk through the valley of the shadow of death i take a look at my life [01:19:27.240 --> 01:19:32.680] in real life that's not enough because i've been rafting and laughing so low a bet [01:19:32.680 --> 01:19:38.840] all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio the calling number five one two six four six [01:19:38.840 --> 01:19:44.360] nineteen eighty four we got about 45 minutes left in the show and we are talking with chris in texas [01:19:45.080 --> 01:19:51.400] all right chris so now you have to go file documents again correct [01:19:51.400 --> 01:20:00.120] um well i was in court on the 14th of this week this last week you know what i'm talking about [01:20:00.120 --> 01:20:04.360] for this new case you said you were in court did you ever file anything in relation to this case [01:20:04.360 --> 01:20:12.760] and other yes okay and they took that the the court assistant in court took the since she [01:20:12.760 --> 01:20:18.120] didn't take them outside of the courtroom she accepted she told the court judge that i had [01:20:18.120 --> 01:20:25.400] motions to file with the judge okay did you buy any chance on the record in court bring up the [01:20:25.400 --> 01:20:31.960] issue to the judge that the court clerk sitting over here back in august denied my right to access [01:20:31.960 --> 01:20:38.440] this court by filing motions in those previous cases which the court just spoke of it wasn't the [01:20:38.440 --> 01:20:46.440] same assistant doesn't matter you could have simply said is this court aware that you're [01:20:46.440 --> 01:20:51.160] that the other assistant that works there whether they still do or not is not relevant to the issue [01:20:51.160 --> 01:20:55.160] the fact is is the court is the court is the court no matter who's acting on its behalf [01:20:56.520 --> 01:21:00.440] okay uh no i did not bring that up to the judge [01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:05.640] had you done that that too would be an official part of the record you could rely on at some [01:21:05.640 --> 01:21:10.680] point to make an argument but because you're not doing these things and keeping up with the [01:21:10.680 --> 01:21:17.400] jones's so to speak on keeping your rights protected you're killing yourself here legally [01:21:17.400 --> 01:21:25.640] speaking when i was in court i did file motions that did uh did have buried on my case uh with [01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:31.720] the this uh current citation that i had and i filed those with her now she told me she was [01:21:31.720 --> 01:21:37.560] going to give me a continuance and see me in two weeks and i think she's gonna i think she was [01:21:37.560 --> 01:21:42.200] gonna combine both cases okay wait a minute she said she was going to give you a continuance did [01:21:42.200 --> 01:21:48.760] you ask for a continuance no she said since i filed the motions with her for this this last case [01:21:49.400 --> 01:21:55.960] that she was going to be continuing and on the on on the basis that they wanted me to talk with [01:21:55.960 --> 01:22:01.000] their city attorney the main city attorney which is also their prosecutor they wanted me to make [01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:07.960] an appointment with him uh and talk to him about the motions okay [01:22:12.920 --> 01:22:19.720] and that that that right there is the main reason for my call is because uh uh i have [01:22:19.720 --> 01:22:25.480] had somebody that has come through your course advised me uh speak to you about it first before [01:22:25.480 --> 01:22:32.760] i actually make the appointment talk to this is the the city attorney that's also their prosecutor [01:22:32.760 --> 01:22:41.160] okay my advice to you in that regard is this only ask questions do not answer any make no [01:22:41.160 --> 01:22:50.600] admissions which would be answering questions okay okay so the point here is ask never answer [01:22:50.600 --> 01:22:57.160] never admit never do anything because this is the person who is using it against you in a court [01:22:57.160 --> 01:23:05.560] of law okay and now when i when she said she was giving me she was giving me my continuance [01:23:05.560 --> 01:23:10.840] i never signed anything court either i didn't sign nothing i didn't she allowed me just to [01:23:10.840 --> 01:23:15.160] walk out i didn't sign anything or nothing i didn't admit anything what day was this [01:23:15.160 --> 01:23:22.440] this was the 14th i said she said she was giving me a continuance she also said that she knows i'm [01:23:22.440 --> 01:23:30.520] not going to give a give a a guilt i'm not going to give i'm not going to give a plea [01:23:31.960 --> 01:23:35.480] so she didn't ask for a plea at that time she just said she was going to give me a [01:23:35.480 --> 01:23:41.480] continuance in regards to uh talking to their city attorney okay you need to follow the a written [01:23:41.480 --> 01:23:49.480] objection to the judge saying she was granting you a continuance because one you never requested [01:23:49.480 --> 01:23:57.160] a continuance two all motions for continuance in texas must be in writing and they must be [01:23:57.160 --> 01:24:03.960] notarized to be legal what they're doing is they're delaying your case and they're making [01:24:03.960 --> 01:24:14.680] it look like it's your fault therefore you have no complaint of failure to provide a speedy trial [01:24:15.080 --> 01:24:25.000] you get it yes sir so file a written objection to the judge's statement of i'm granting you a [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:31.400] continuance you didn't ask for one you didn't file a motion a verified motion asking for one [01:24:31.400 --> 01:24:38.040] one that's a violation of the code of criminal procedure hence it's a violation of the code [01:24:38.040 --> 01:24:39.240] of judicial conduct [01:24:45.720 --> 01:24:51.560] okay now the other thing is is just for everyone listening for future reference [01:24:52.680 --> 01:24:59.160] if a court if a judge in a court is going to tell you to meet with the attorney prosecuting you [01:24:59.160 --> 01:25:07.320] you the first thing you need to do is say judge if you're going to have me speak about the facts [01:25:07.320 --> 01:25:12.680] of this case with the person prosecuting this case against me then i demand the court provide me [01:25:12.680 --> 01:25:14.440] with assistance of counsel immediately [01:25:19.640 --> 01:25:24.760] watch how quickly the subject of having you meet with the prosecuting attorney goes right out the [01:25:24.760 --> 01:25:36.680] window and is that and then this and then there's continuance is that does that do anything to [01:25:36.680 --> 01:25:43.160] put the case in my favor i mean it's it's written and it can you need to file a motion to disqualify [01:25:43.160 --> 01:25:48.600] this judge because this judge is not being fair to you she's trying to delay your right to a speedy [01:25:48.600 --> 01:25:53.800] trial by making false statements in the official record that you requested a continuance when you [01:25:53.800 --> 01:25:59.560] did not recuse her and dis or disqualify her from your case [01:26:02.760 --> 01:26:09.000] yes sir but make damn sure you filed judicial conduct complaints against her for what she did [01:26:13.400 --> 01:26:13.880] yes sir [01:26:16.200 --> 01:26:19.160] and do i follow that with the uh follow that with the court as well [01:26:19.160 --> 01:26:25.720] so yeah you need to file that but you're going to file the judicial you need to file the objection [01:26:25.720 --> 01:26:29.640] with the court you need to file the judicial conduct complaint with the judicial conduct [01:26:29.640 --> 01:26:33.720] commission you need to file the motion to disqualify with the court [01:26:35.720 --> 01:26:43.400] this is a municipal judge right yes okay court judge then you also need to make sure that you [01:26:43.400 --> 01:26:50.280] see see a copy of that motion to disqualify and the written objection for the judge providing [01:26:50.280 --> 01:26:57.080] a continuance in your name that you didn't request and i would also go ahead and make the [01:26:57.080 --> 01:27:01.800] objection that the court refused to accept legal pleadings in your in previous cases [01:27:04.280 --> 01:27:09.960] and send that to the head administrative judge of the district that oversees the administrative [01:27:09.960 --> 01:27:17.160] management of these courts because the courts required by law under chapter 29 of the Texas [01:27:17.160 --> 01:27:23.400] government code to send that information to that judge themselves but they never do all [01:27:23.400 --> 01:27:28.920] they do is hand it off to another municipal judge with no hearing and the law specifically says [01:27:28.920 --> 01:27:34.840] that when the motion to disqualify has been made that there must be a hearing and the administrative [01:27:34.840 --> 01:27:40.200] judge must set it up yes sir [01:27:44.280 --> 01:27:48.920] chapter 29 government code look at it study it understand it apply it [01:27:52.280 --> 01:27:52.840] yes sir [01:27:58.040 --> 01:28:02.120] so what don't want to have to step up now also be aware there's multiple [01:28:02.120 --> 01:28:06.040] subsections of chapter 29 make sure you look at all of them [01:28:11.880 --> 01:28:20.360] all right there's like a 29 a and 29 a is where this is versus just a straight 29 [01:28:20.360 --> 01:28:35.320] 29 section a 29 dash a or 29 a i forget maybe no dash but it's it's in there it's in the [01:28:35.320 --> 01:28:40.600] government code it comes after chapter 29 all righty [01:28:43.160 --> 01:28:49.720] that's good to know that's good to look up to yeah like i said at the beginning of the show [01:28:49.720 --> 01:28:55.960] i don't give information i can't tell you where to verify it of course and where do i find the [01:28:55.960 --> 01:29:02.360] the written objections adi we're kind of fine we're gonna find something like that you can't [01:29:02.360 --> 01:29:08.280] the new seminar material will have them but the old one does not so basically all you have to do [01:29:08.280 --> 01:29:16.680] is format it with just a few different sections the first one is the objection the second one [01:29:16.680 --> 01:29:22.520] is the legal basis for the objection the third one is the request being made of the court because [01:29:22.520 --> 01:29:34.200] of the objection and then followed is a verified pleading in other words get it notarized okay [01:29:36.360 --> 01:29:41.640] awesome at least helps me some but helps me somewhat yeah [01:29:41.640 --> 01:29:48.360] yeah because i'm still pretty much all made of this myself so forgive me if i'm not if i'm not [01:29:48.920 --> 01:29:54.520] i'm not uh if i'm not keeping up with the jones per se i ain't worried about the jones i'm [01:29:54.520 --> 01:30:01.640] worried about you and you better keep up or they're going to get you it seems like everywhere you [01:30:01.640 --> 01:30:06.120] turn nowadays someone wants your name social security number and date of birth but you should [01:30:06.120 --> 01:30:11.160] think twice before giving away your personal data i'm dr catherine albrecht and i'll say more in just [01:30:11.160 --> 01:30:17.160] a moment google is watching you recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive [01:30:17.160 --> 01:30:23.080] database of your personal information that's creepy but it doesn't have to be that way start page [01:30:23.080 --> 01:30:28.360] dot com is the world's most private search engine start page dot com doesn't store your ip address [01:30:28.360 --> 01:30:32.920] make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified if you [01:30:32.920 --> 01:30:38.760] don't like big brother spying on you start over with start page great search results and total [01:30:38.760 --> 01:30:44.600] privacy start page dot com the world's most private search engine forms forms forms they're [01:30:44.600 --> 01:30:49.400] everywhere but just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it [01:30:49.400 --> 01:30:55.000] i laid blank spaces on forms all the time or i write n slash a for not applicable and usually [01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:00.120] nobody notices or cares i never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's [01:31:00.120 --> 01:31:05.320] absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement and i won't give my phone number to a [01:31:05.320 --> 01:31:10.280] company or an organization unless i actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare to preserve [01:31:10.280 --> 01:31:15.960] our vanishing privacy we need to practice saying no to random data requests it's like exercising a [01:31:15.960 --> 01:31:21.320] muscle it gets easier the more you do it i'm dr catherine albrecht more news and information at [01:31:21.320 --> 01:31:36.840] Catherine all breath dot com i lost my son my uncle my son on september 11 2000 most people [01:31:36.840 --> 01:31:42.840] don't know that a third tower fell on september 11 world trade center seven a 47 story skyscraper [01:31:42.840 --> 01:31:49.400] was not hit by a plane the official explanation is that fire brought down building seven over 1200 [01:31:49.400 --> 01:31:53.560] architects and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there's more to the story [01:31:53.560 --> 01:32:00.520] bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what dot org why it fell why it matters [01:32:00.520 --> 01:32:06.680] as what you can do rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's [01:32:06.680 --> 01:32:10.440] america we live in a mess against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free [01:32:10.440 --> 01:32:14.920] society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right [01:32:14.920 --> 01:32:19.000] to travel freely from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly [01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:23.720] the right to do process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn [01:32:23.720 --> 01:32:28.200] how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's deputy eddie craig [01:32:28.200 --> 01:32:31.800] in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool [01:32:31.800 --> 01:32:35.800] available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule [01:32:35.800 --> 01:32:40.360] of law you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio dot com [01:32:40.360 --> 01:32:44.200] and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas [01:32:44.200 --> 01:32:49.160] transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds [01:32:49.160 --> 01:32:53.080] of research documents and further useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with [01:32:53.080 --> 01:32:57.560] the help of this material for rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and together we can [01:32:57.560 --> 01:33:07.160] have the free society we all want to and deserve you're listening to the logos radio network [01:33:07.160 --> 01:33:17.160] at logo's radio network dot com [01:33:37.160 --> 01:33:58.040] all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we now have a half an hour left in the [01:33:58.040 --> 01:34:02.920] show five one two six four six nineteen eighty four is a calling number i will try to get to [01:34:02.920 --> 01:34:08.360] everybody but i could make no guarantees that said let's see if we can finish up the chris [01:34:09.240 --> 01:34:17.640] all right chris anything else well my um um uh you know my brother charles he's had the same [01:34:17.640 --> 01:34:24.120] trouble with the same judge that i'm having trouble with now said that uh started recused uh [01:34:24.120 --> 01:34:29.240] from six of the cases that were brought against them by the same judge who were doing the same [01:34:29.240 --> 01:34:39.720] impropriety ah okay you're that chris okay well he's right he did [01:34:42.680 --> 01:34:49.080] so what is your question about that well i mean she has a case history of doing all this [01:34:49.080 --> 01:34:58.920] impropriety uh especially in my case a difference from his cases in traffic court i mean what can i do [01:34:59.480 --> 01:35:05.800] to help get her recused a lot faster well there is no faster do it the way i told you and just get [01:35:05.800 --> 01:35:20.680] it done yes sir faster is not up to you well is there anything i can ask this district attorney [01:35:20.680 --> 01:35:25.080] did the only way you can get rid of this judge faster is to prove that she pulled a gun on you [01:35:25.080 --> 01:35:36.360] in court yes sir now you can also petition to have her removed from the bench when you file [01:35:36.360 --> 01:35:41.640] the judicial conduct complaint if you can show that she's a habitual offender of rights and due [01:35:41.640 --> 01:35:49.480] process but that's a long row to hoe considering the information you've got you would need to go in [01:35:49.480 --> 01:35:55.320] and collect a lot of different people's cases and get them to be willing to go to court or swear [01:35:55.320 --> 01:36:01.000] out affidavits that she's done the same thing to them in the same way multiple times before you'd [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:11.240] even begin to have the grounds to make them look at that okay all right i thank you i appreciate [01:36:11.240 --> 01:36:17.240] the advice you give me tonight it gives me a lot to look forward to a lot to let's start to get my [01:36:17.240 --> 01:36:25.160] objections going against this this the judge on the bench because i didn't say anything about [01:36:25.160 --> 01:36:32.280] continuing she just offered it to me all of a sudden and i'm like well texas law and the [01:36:32.280 --> 01:36:40.600] code of criminal procedure specifically says continuances must be in writing period not only [01:36:40.600 --> 01:36:46.360] they have to be in writing they have to be verified which means they have to be notarized under oath [01:36:46.360 --> 01:36:52.200] that the reason you're requesting the continuance is a lawful valid reason and it is not for the [01:36:52.200 --> 01:37:00.200] purpose of delay and the court's saying we're going to grant you a continuance when in fact you [01:37:00.200 --> 01:37:06.440] didn't request one and the court can't give any valid grounds other than because we want you to [01:37:06.440 --> 01:37:16.840] meet with the guy that's making our money for us there's something wrong with this scenario [01:37:16.840 --> 01:37:21.800] okay but they still want me to make an appointment with them when i'm making an appointment with them [01:37:21.800 --> 01:37:27.240] just don't answer any questions just ask questions correct and don't ask your questions in such a way [01:37:27.240 --> 01:37:35.880] as to answer theirs or incriminate yourself anything they say is what your only thing is [01:37:35.880 --> 01:37:40.840] what is your evidence of that what what is your evidence of that where are your witnesses to that [01:37:42.280 --> 01:37:48.760] ask questions make no admissions well you back out of spot right what is your evidence of that [01:37:48.760 --> 01:37:58.040] not yes i did you get it yes sir i get it [01:37:58.040 --> 01:38:08.040] oh hard to get thank you mr eddie you're welcome good luck thank you sir you're welcome bye bye [01:38:08.040 --> 01:38:17.320] bless you all right now next up in line we have david in texas if i can get this mouse to work [01:38:17.320 --> 01:38:31.800] david what can we do for you hello david is there a david in the house check the mute button man [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:44.440] hello hello all right we'll come back to see if david's there in a few minutes [01:38:44.440 --> 01:38:51.480] and meantime we have truth raider on the line let's see if i can get this mouse to work [01:38:54.440 --> 01:39:03.080] raider yes happy new decade yep so far my god by the end of this decade by the 7th of 31st [01:39:03.080 --> 01:39:08.840] 2029 number four through the slam of these bureaucratic bogs-o's turn the tables on [01:39:08.840 --> 01:39:16.440] them sue the crap out of them as you say and have victory that's not burning desire and [01:39:16.440 --> 01:39:23.640] go but end of this decade i'm sure you're with me on that if you think you can get it done be my [01:39:23.640 --> 01:39:31.080] guest well i'm not gonna use your help i'll be waiting and i'm asking from time to time when [01:39:31.080 --> 01:39:40.680] i have some news updated some of my materials ready i could sure use those motions okay [01:39:41.800 --> 01:39:44.040] okay all right two questions real quick [01:39:46.520 --> 01:39:53.000] february 26 is the next so-called tribune it's not even a trial because it doesn't meet the [01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:59.000] criteria for a trial because all parties are not present in the courtroom in order to [01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:04.440] establish it as a trial i'd like to say there's no way i can get a fair trial in any of these cases [01:40:05.800 --> 01:40:13.000] but the traffic stop is on september 26 and it's so-called trial it's on february 26 [01:40:14.200 --> 01:40:16.600] you see a little problem with that about five months in between [01:40:18.600 --> 01:40:24.600] is that a little bit late in your opinion well that depends what does the law in the state you're [01:40:24.600 --> 01:40:31.000] currently in say they have as far as a time frame goes to prosecute a misdemeanor case such as this [01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:39.080] or this is a civil case right that's correct five look and see what that is you'll write that down [01:40:39.080 --> 01:40:43.000] and i will look that don't know that answer but i was going to see what you thought about that [01:40:44.040 --> 01:40:50.360] and your opinion for right now is kind of kind of a stretch kind of a delay [01:40:50.360 --> 01:40:59.880] if you're five months in between well here in texas five months is failure to provide a speedy [01:40:59.880 --> 01:41:07.560] trial provided you ever demanded the speedy trial which is why it's one of the first motions that we [01:41:07.560 --> 01:41:15.880] file and have that notarized as you were saying to the previous color everything that we do is [01:41:15.880 --> 01:41:21.960] notarized we file only verified pleadings and objections and things like that in our cases [01:41:21.960 --> 01:41:27.560] here if you're using the seminar material because that's what they could get calls for now if you [01:41:27.560 --> 01:41:32.200] don't do that well that's on you but it should be the way you're doing it according to the [01:41:32.200 --> 01:41:39.800] instructions in the material everything's a verified pleading yes sir and when i do go down [01:41:39.800 --> 01:41:47.640] to the court window there are the different places so-called municipal court i turn on [01:41:47.640 --> 01:41:52.040] my cell phone camera record the clerks and everything there the whole transaction [01:41:53.160 --> 01:42:01.480] i make sure i have a record of that on video so did you receive my message i gave you a message [01:42:01.480 --> 01:42:08.200] a couple days ago and i gave you an offer my question is if you ever consider doing what [01:42:08.200 --> 01:42:13.880] well if you have to listen to the message would you consider that offer i don't know that i have [01:42:13.880 --> 01:42:20.200] a message my phone has not told me i have any voice messages okay well i i left it a couple [01:42:20.200 --> 01:42:29.560] days ago send me emails radar emails so i can go back and find stuff i can't find the voice [01:42:29.560 --> 01:42:36.360] messages they're either there or they aren't okay i check that phone when it should be recorded [01:42:36.360 --> 01:42:43.400] but i'll send that also yeah if you request well my phone only records the conversation if i answer [01:42:43.400 --> 01:42:50.840] it oh really okay all right so you don't have a set up recorded no i have a set up to record if [01:42:50.840 --> 01:42:56.280] i answer the phone because there's no there's no communication unless i answered the phone [01:42:56.280 --> 01:43:01.640] otherwise it goes back to the phone company to go to voicemail not my phone and you don't have [01:43:01.640 --> 01:43:06.760] that set up you don't have a voice box set up on your phone okay no all right well send an email [01:43:06.760 --> 01:43:15.080] then that's not the way the technology works the voicemails are not left on your phone they're left [01:43:15.080 --> 01:43:21.960] at the phone company that's why you have to dial the phone company to get your messages right [01:43:21.960 --> 01:43:28.200] but if you don't have a box set up and you can't do that obviously okay final question for you [01:43:28.200 --> 01:43:34.600] if you had to do this all over again eddie being the degree of difficulty that this is would you [01:43:34.600 --> 01:43:45.000] do all this all over again why would i not write is right wrong is wrong idiots or idiots criminals [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:51.480] or criminals why wouldn't i all right it's your shade all right there's the uh music from commercial [01:43:51.480 --> 01:43:56.120] break that's all i got for you goodnight and god bless as always brother all right thanks for calling [01:43:56.120 --> 01:44:03.000] all right folks will be right back for the last segment through advances in technology our lives [01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:08.120] have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition people feed their pets better than [01:44:08.120 --> 01:44:14.440] they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease [01:44:14.440 --> 01:44:20.520] in this toxic environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been irradiated [01:44:20.520 --> 01:44:27.320] adulterated and mutilated young jeffrey can provide the nutrients you need logos radio network gets [01:44:27.320 --> 01:44:32.840] many requests to endorse all sorts of products most of which we reject we have come to trust [01:44:32.840 --> 01:44:39.160] young jeffrey so much we became a marketing distributor along with alex jones ben fuchs and [01:44:39.160 --> 01:44:45.480] many others when you order from logos radio network dot com your health will improve as you [01:44:45.480 --> 01:44:52.040] help support quality radio as you realize the benefits of young jeffrey you may want to join us [01:44:52.040 --> 01:44:57.880] as a distributor you can experience improved health help your friends and family and increase [01:44:57.880 --> 01:45:05.400] your income order now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without [01:45:05.400 --> 01:45:11.800] an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show [01:45:11.800 --> 01:45:19.480] you how in 24 hours death by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if [01:45:19.480 --> 01:45:25.160] you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by [01:45:25.160 --> 01:45:32.440] step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years [01:45:32.440 --> 01:45:38.440] of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should [01:45:38.440 --> 01:45:44.360] understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive our [01:45:44.360 --> 01:45:52.840] audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases prosa tactics and much more please [01:45:52.840 --> 01:46:00.360] visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner or call toll free 866 law easy [01:46:00.360 --> 01:46:11.960] okay [01:46:11.960 --> 01:46:32.040] All right folks, we are back. [01:46:32.040 --> 01:46:33.960] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:46:33.960 --> 01:46:39.200] Calling number won't be necessary because this is the last segment of the show and hopefully [01:46:39.200 --> 01:46:40.760] we got one caller left. [01:46:40.760 --> 01:46:45.760] But just in case they don't pick up the phone, 512-646-1984. [01:46:45.760 --> 01:46:54.240] All right, David, are you there? [01:46:54.240 --> 01:46:56.520] Hello, David. [01:46:56.520 --> 01:47:03.760] Well, okay, I'm going to have to say David is not there. [01:47:03.760 --> 01:47:08.320] So either David just called in to listen over the telephone or David isn't working correctly [01:47:08.320 --> 01:47:09.320] on to talk. [01:47:09.320 --> 01:47:13.920] So if anybody else wants to call in in the last segment of the show, please be my guest [01:47:13.920 --> 01:47:16.200] and we'll get to you as quick as we can here. [01:47:16.200 --> 01:47:20.400] All right, back to what I originally said at the opening of the show about being right [01:47:20.400 --> 01:47:24.280] or wrong with the information I've provided to folks over the years. [01:47:24.280 --> 01:47:29.760] Again, I never claimed to be perfect, never claimed to always be right, but you are never [01:47:29.760 --> 01:47:35.680] going to tell me I'm wrong if you can't prove I'm wrong because I researched my information, [01:47:35.680 --> 01:47:44.600] I verify my information, I cross-check my information, I match it up to other information [01:47:44.600 --> 01:47:48.080] and I make sure that it is valid. [01:47:48.080 --> 01:47:53.960] Now when you tell me a court case says otherwise and the court case has not done the things [01:47:53.960 --> 01:47:59.760] I've done to verify what I'm saying, I'm not accepting that court case as factual. [01:47:59.760 --> 01:48:06.400] Yes, it may be the status of the law as the court see it, but it is not the law as it [01:48:06.400 --> 01:48:12.640] is written and that case needs to be challenged on that basis alone. [01:48:12.640 --> 01:48:19.280] So knowing is part of the battle in doing exactly that. [01:48:19.280 --> 01:48:24.640] So I don't disagree with court cases just because I disagree with judges and attorneys. [01:48:24.640 --> 01:48:31.440] I disagree with them because they are flat-out fricking wrong and it isn't all that hard [01:48:31.440 --> 01:48:37.760] to point out where many of these cases have done things that are unconstitutional and [01:48:37.760 --> 01:48:43.920] created a doctrine that the judiciary has no lawful authority to make. [01:48:43.920 --> 01:48:50.560] It has created a version of the law that is nothing less than a complete rewrite and [01:48:50.560 --> 01:48:55.440] a change of the legislative subject matter, which is exactly the case in the transportation [01:48:55.440 --> 01:49:00.360] code, which is unconstitutional. [01:49:00.360 --> 01:49:03.320] That is not a power given to the courts. [01:49:03.320 --> 01:49:09.160] They cannot change the legislative purpose of a law to encompass subject matter. [01:49:09.160 --> 01:49:15.920] That the subject matter the legislature defined does not and that is exactly what they've [01:49:15.920 --> 01:49:16.920] done. [01:49:16.920 --> 01:49:21.680] Now, you want to say I'm wrong, anyone? [01:49:21.680 --> 01:49:31.080] Prove it and do it with the law, not somebody's opinion about the law when that opinion does [01:49:31.080 --> 01:49:36.360] not do the research and never has. [01:49:36.360 --> 01:49:40.920] And none of them do, absolutely none of them do. [01:49:40.920 --> 01:49:47.680] So you can't tell me any of them are correct when they are ruling against private people [01:49:47.680 --> 01:49:53.000] traveling in their cars versus someone engaged in transportation. [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:58.160] The opinion is dead wrong from the word go on that basis alone. [01:49:58.160 --> 01:50:04.960] All right, that said, I appear to have a wireless caller with no name, so this is possibly a [01:50:04.960 --> 01:50:05.960] first-time caller. [01:50:05.960 --> 01:50:09.640] Who am I talking with, please, and where are you calling from? [01:50:09.640 --> 01:50:17.720] Hello, 267 area code. [01:50:17.720 --> 01:50:24.600] Well, that's another caller that ain't calling. [01:50:24.600 --> 01:50:32.560] All right, so if you think you can do that, then please be my guest because you will have [01:50:32.560 --> 01:50:36.320] to have done the same research I've done in order to do it. [01:50:36.320 --> 01:50:41.680] And if you do the same research that I've done, there is no way you're going to come [01:50:41.680 --> 01:50:46.240] in front of me and try to say you're still wrong. [01:50:46.240 --> 01:50:48.720] Just not going to happen. [01:50:48.720 --> 01:50:54.040] I'm that confident in the information I have and how it fits together. [01:50:54.040 --> 01:50:57.360] You're not going to be able to stand in front of me and say I'm still wrong. [01:50:57.360 --> 01:51:02.560] If you do all the research I've done and look at everything I've looked at, never going [01:51:02.560 --> 01:51:05.040] to happen. [01:51:05.040 --> 01:51:13.280] Unless your whole point is just to lie and maintain the status quo to begin with, okay? [01:51:13.280 --> 01:51:15.400] So I don't have to be right all the time. [01:51:15.400 --> 01:51:24.760] I just have to be right this time, and I am absolutely confident I am. [01:51:24.760 --> 01:51:29.200] If it comes to anything else that I've said that is incorrect, well, again, I'm willing [01:51:29.200 --> 01:51:33.640] to accept it's incorrect if you can show me where and how it is incorrect as long as you [01:51:33.640 --> 01:51:40.240] are not basing it entirely on a court opinion, or unless what I said is relative entirely [01:51:40.240 --> 01:51:45.600] to that court opinion. [01:51:45.600 --> 01:51:51.360] But when I'm talking about the actual written law, I'm talking about something I have read [01:51:51.360 --> 01:51:55.880] front to back, backwards and forwards, and found every other relevant statute that has [01:51:55.880 --> 01:51:59.520] anything to do with it. [01:51:59.520 --> 01:52:01.600] Something that the courts do not do. [01:52:01.600 --> 01:52:07.440] They do some of them some of the time, but very rarely do enough of them to understand [01:52:07.440 --> 01:52:09.080] the big picture. [01:52:09.080 --> 01:52:13.200] I know, I'll read the opinions, I've looked at what they've argued, I've looked at how [01:52:13.200 --> 01:52:14.200] they've ruled. [01:52:14.200 --> 01:52:21.000] I know they're not taking everything into consideration because they never mention it, which is what [01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:27.040] they would do if they had, because it affects the outcome of their decision, unless of course [01:52:27.040 --> 01:52:32.400] you are willing to admit that the corrupt attorneys and the corrupt courts don't do [01:52:32.400 --> 01:52:40.680] that because it would expose the scam they're running. [01:52:40.680 --> 01:52:42.760] Because that's what we're dealing with here. [01:52:42.760 --> 01:52:48.040] When it's all boiled down to the very bottom of the pot, there's a scam being put on. [01:52:48.040 --> 01:52:52.920] The lawyers and the judges are responsible for it, and it is intended to subjugate the [01:52:52.920 --> 01:52:59.800] American people to law and putative funding of the government through an illegal form [01:52:59.800 --> 01:53:05.240] of taxation called fines and fees that we were never subject to under the law to begin [01:53:05.240 --> 01:53:06.640] with. [01:53:06.640 --> 01:53:13.640] If you don't see why that would be a problem, what the hell are you arguing with me for? [01:53:13.640 --> 01:53:19.040] Because you obviously have no brain cell in your head that works. [01:53:19.040 --> 01:53:22.760] What could you possibly have that you think is going to empower you to argue with me [01:53:22.760 --> 01:53:26.280] on this subject if that's the case? [01:53:26.280 --> 01:53:34.760] See, my premise in understanding law begins on a very basic fundamental foundation. [01:53:34.760 --> 01:53:43.000] The people have rights, the government does not, and the servant cannot have a greater [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:49.560] power than that bequeathed to them by their master. [01:53:49.560 --> 01:53:51.760] That's simple. [01:53:51.760 --> 01:53:59.960] If they write a rule or an opinion or a regulation or a statute or an ordinance that violates [01:53:59.960 --> 01:54:08.480] that foundational premise, it is wrong end of discussion. [01:54:08.480 --> 01:54:14.400] And I will do everything within my power to make sure that I expose it based upon what [01:54:14.400 --> 01:54:19.520] the law says or does as a whole. [01:54:19.520 --> 01:54:26.800] Because when the law is wrong, it is unjust to everyone whom it touches, not just some [01:54:26.800 --> 01:54:33.760] of them, all of them. [01:54:33.760 --> 01:54:41.120] America was not built on the premise of being a foundational government of law. [01:54:41.120 --> 01:54:47.600] It was built on the premise of individual rights and liberty protected by that law. [01:54:47.600 --> 01:54:53.520] Not abused by it, not destroyed by it, but protected by it. [01:54:53.520 --> 01:55:03.080] And when the law fails in that regard, it is not a just and valid law. [01:55:03.080 --> 01:55:05.680] There is no other premise for me to think about this from. [01:55:05.680 --> 01:55:08.960] There is no other perspective for me to think about this from. [01:55:08.960 --> 01:55:09.960] That's it. [01:55:09.960 --> 01:55:13.400] That's how it flies from point A to point B in my book. [01:55:13.400 --> 01:55:14.960] You don't like my book? [01:55:14.960 --> 01:55:17.040] I don't care. [01:55:17.040 --> 01:55:32.080] I don't care what some third party individual thinks about how I can exercise my rights [01:55:32.080 --> 01:55:38.200] when my exercise does not violate the fundamental principles of right and wrong. [01:55:38.200 --> 01:55:45.520] So as to harm the rights person or property of any other, my servant has no power or authority [01:55:45.520 --> 01:55:55.200] granted by anyone for any reason to dictate that I've used my rights improperly. [01:55:55.200 --> 01:56:00.680] I don't care what court rules otherwise. [01:56:00.680 --> 01:56:03.040] And you folks should feel the same way. [01:56:03.040 --> 01:56:08.880] Not because I said so, but because your rights are exactly the same as mine. [01:56:08.880 --> 01:56:13.400] Your rights suffer harm exactly the same as mine. [01:56:13.400 --> 01:56:16.440] Surely you understand that or not, it's a different issue. [01:56:16.440 --> 01:56:23.200] But the fact that you accept it, therein lies the problem in how this system operates in [01:56:23.200 --> 01:56:29.960] perpetuity to continue its abuses of all that we hold dear. [01:56:29.960 --> 01:56:34.040] And I decided no more. [01:56:34.040 --> 01:56:42.160] I had been abused enough by the law and those who wielded it improperly, illegally and without [01:56:42.160 --> 01:56:50.960] any consideration for what it did and did not validly allow them to do. [01:56:50.960 --> 01:56:53.240] And here I am. [01:56:53.240 --> 01:56:57.960] And because of that, this radio show exists. [01:56:57.960 --> 01:57:03.240] The information that I've brought to you folks has been made public knowledge. [01:57:03.240 --> 01:57:10.800] And I want to ask you in all honesty, and I'm trying to do this to lift myself up, I'm simply [01:57:10.800 --> 01:57:17.840] trying to understand where I fit into this niche as far as you are concerned, okay? [01:57:17.840 --> 01:57:29.040] Where else have you ever heard this specific information and had it coupled with the information [01:57:29.040 --> 01:57:34.680] necessary to verify it on your own? [01:57:34.680 --> 01:57:43.480] If it didn't come from this show first or from this show entirely, where did you get [01:57:43.480 --> 01:57:45.760] it? [01:57:45.760 --> 01:57:48.600] That's a question you need to ask yourself. [01:57:48.600 --> 01:57:53.800] And then if the answer to your question is, well, it definitely came from you, then I [01:57:53.800 --> 01:58:00.400] have to ask you, why then don't we have your financial backing on a regular basis to be [01:58:00.400 --> 01:58:07.480] able to stay on the air and do what is necessary to bring this information to you guys? [01:58:07.480 --> 01:58:13.320] Because we need it, we work for it, we don't do it out of the expectation of it, but it [01:58:13.320 --> 01:58:18.120] sure would be nice once in a while to have that support and to know that we're helping. [01:58:18.120 --> 01:58:24.280] All right, folks, I want to say thank you all for the callers, and I want to also say [01:58:24.280 --> 01:58:50.800] have a great new year, good night, and God bless. [01:58:50.800 --> 01:58:56.160] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New [01:58:56.160 --> 01:58:58.080] Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.080 --> 01:59:03.040] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:03.040 --> 01:59:08.720] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.720 --> 01:59:12.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:20.960] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.960 --> 01:59:26.480] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus [01:59:26.480 --> 01:59:30.520] charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.520 --> 01:59:33.040] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:41.440] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.440 --> 01:59:51.640] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.640 --> 01:59:53.280] Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.280 --> 02:00:14.240] You can find it at LogosRadioNetwork.com.