[00:00.000 --> 00:06.880]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.880 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.520]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.520 --> 00:29.760]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $20.00
[00:29.760 --> 00:41.520]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:46.000 --> 00:52.480]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a tying suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.480 --> 00:58.240]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.240 --> 01:07.520]  entering 40 today in history. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.520 --> 01:13.200]  1325 legalizing hemp into Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including
[01:13.200 --> 01:17.360]  Houston, Austin, and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even
[01:17.360 --> 01:21.440]  refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:21.440 --> 01:26.720]  or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:26.720 --> 01:30.720]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and
[01:30.720 --> 01:35.440]  delivery of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials,
[01:35.440 --> 01:39.440]  including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on
[01:39.440 --> 01:44.560]  Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a
[01:44.560 --> 01:51.040]  misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney,
[01:51.040 --> 01:57.040]  and El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law
[01:57.040 --> 02:02.800]  quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue
[02:02.800 --> 02:07.680]  was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County who
[02:07.680 --> 02:12.160]  stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its
[02:12.160 --> 02:17.200]  chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what
[02:17.200 --> 02:26.320]  they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American
[02:26.320 --> 02:32.080]  pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second
[02:32.080 --> 02:37.760]  pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the
[02:37.760 --> 02:43.040]  East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from
[02:43.040 --> 02:49.680]  a gland near its front fins. For the purpose, it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn
[02:49.680 --> 03:14.640]  into the glow. This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[03:14.640 --> 03:20.800]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[03:20.800 --> 03:25.600]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot. I'm thinking people being victimized by criminal
[03:25.600 --> 03:29.680]  cops. Psychopathic predators terrorizing neighborhood blocks. They clip with pepper spray,
[03:29.680 --> 03:34.000]  mate, cuss, gazes and glass. They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts. Forget
[03:34.000 --> 03:38.400]  what you talk. The cops have got a license to kill. Witness intimidation means that they can use it
[03:38.400 --> 03:42.320]  at will. Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal. And if they go to court,
[03:42.320 --> 03:46.400]  they know the judge will make them a deal for real. That's why they're stopping me, locking me up,
[03:46.400 --> 03:50.640]  stopping me, complicating my property, talking to my demographers, making the proof of my
[03:50.640 --> 03:54.080]  identity. All right folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your
[03:54.080 --> 04:04.640]  host Eddie Craig. It is November 18, 2019. And this year is just rolling right on by it. Okay,
[04:05.440 --> 04:11.920]  couple things. In case you hadn't heard about him, there is a sheriff's deputy in the state of
[04:11.920 --> 04:19.600]  Florida who was recently called planting drugs on people whenever he pulled them over for a traffic
[04:19.600 --> 04:30.480]  stop. And because of the number of times this cop has done this, over 100 cases have been thrown
[04:30.480 --> 04:42.880]  out because this was the arresting officer. Out of all of these cases, supposedly if he gets convicted,
[04:42.880 --> 04:50.080]  this cop can face up to 100 years in prison. I would like to go on the record right now
[04:50.080 --> 05:01.680]  as predicting that he will not serve more than 10 years total for anything he's done,
[05:03.600 --> 05:12.560]  if even that much. I would like to go on record saying before this plays out, that's how that's
[05:12.560 --> 05:20.880]  going to play out if he even gets convicted at all. He should, but then again, that all depends on
[05:20.880 --> 05:27.280]  how many people on his jury want to chiss up and rub their noses in that thin blue line flag, right?
[05:29.040 --> 05:37.520]  Now, we also have this week instances of cops stopping cars that are leaving,
[05:37.520 --> 05:44.480]  you know, sporting events and things of that nature just to harass the occupants. There's no
[05:44.480 --> 05:49.680]  valid reason to detain the individuals in the car to stop the car. They're leaving an event,
[05:49.680 --> 05:56.160]  they've done absolutely nothing wrong, but they're getting stopped and inspected by hordes of police
[05:56.160 --> 06:01.760]  officers at the exits. And these police officers are stopping everybody and demanding that they
[06:01.760 --> 06:08.400]  produce identification, which on its face is blatantly illegal and unconstitutional.
[06:09.040 --> 06:15.520]  And then you have the idiot officers saying that they have every legal right to stop anyone they
[06:15.520 --> 06:25.120]  want to and demand their ID, which we know to be a complete and total lie. Now, we also know the
[06:25.120 --> 06:35.440]  Supreme Court ruled that cops are allowed to lie to the public. However, when that lie is used to
[06:35.440 --> 06:43.200]  facilitate a deprivation of a right under the premise of an authority that the officer does
[06:43.200 --> 06:55.040]  not legally have, that makes it a whole other ballgame. And this is why knowing what these cops
[06:55.040 --> 07:03.840]  can and cannot legitimately do becomes so important. Okay? Now, cops are not the only ones that do this.
[07:04.720 --> 07:10.560]  Prosecutors do it, defense attorneys do it. If you think your defense attorney is defending you,
[07:10.560 --> 07:18.000]  think again, unless you have lined their pockets with more cash than anyone else,
[07:18.000 --> 07:23.280]  they're not defending you, they're defending the system. And you will become whatever
[07:24.480 --> 07:31.680]  cannon fodder you need to to facilitate the protection of the system. Okay? If and when
[07:31.680 --> 07:41.440]  that is the necessary outcome to your particular case. Now, on top of this, you have judges who do
[07:41.440 --> 07:50.000]  it, and they do it repeatedly. But I want to back up and go to private law firms who do it,
[07:50.800 --> 07:57.360]  not private law firms who are acting as prosecutors or as defense attorneys, but who are doing it
[07:57.360 --> 08:04.800]  in these debt collection letters they're sending out to people saying you owe for fines and fees
[08:04.800 --> 08:10.000]  out of this court this amount of money. When in fact you don't owe anything because one,
[08:10.000 --> 08:16.400]  your case has never gone to trial and it's never been adjudicated. And you've never entered a plea
[08:16.400 --> 08:22.240]  of guilty or null or contender and filed that with the court so as to allow the court to proceed
[08:22.240 --> 08:27.680]  in absentia to issue the conviction order and set the fine and the judgment and all that good
[08:27.680 --> 08:34.400]  stuff. All of which requires that that court generate specific paperwork as part of the final
[08:34.960 --> 08:46.160]  judgment process. Okay? Now, given that, what then is the legitimate authority for these law firms
[08:46.160 --> 08:53.440]  to be contacted by these municipalities and justices of the peace and say I want you to collect on
[08:53.440 --> 09:05.440]  this set of fines, but they don't tell the attorneys that the case has never been adjudicated.
[09:06.880 --> 09:12.720]  They just say send them a notice, tell them they owe it and see if they pay it. How is this not
[09:12.720 --> 09:26.480]  fraud? How is it not male fraud? How is it not simulation of legal process? How is it not numerous
[09:26.480 --> 09:34.480]  felonies? How is it not a violation of the Code of Judicial and Professional Ethics
[09:35.680 --> 09:41.360]  for attorneys and judges to engage in this particular type of activity and to collude
[09:41.360 --> 09:47.600]  with each other to do it? That's criminal conspiracy and criminal conspiracy to commit
[09:47.600 --> 09:55.360]  male fraud. The criminal conspiracy comes into the play because absent an adjudication of this case
[09:55.360 --> 10:02.320]  there is no legally valid judgment therefore there can be no debt related to a judgment.
[10:04.160 --> 10:10.320]  So they are depriving the individual who they are trying to get money out of their pocket
[10:10.320 --> 10:14.000]  via this notice from these attorneys that they owe this alleged debt.
[10:16.400 --> 10:23.760]  They're depriving them of their right of due process in a criminal case. They're trying to punish them
[10:23.760 --> 10:29.200]  without a trial and they're using fraudulent communications to do it.
[10:31.920 --> 10:39.600]  This is criminal folks. There's no if ands or buts about this. This entire process
[10:39.600 --> 10:50.640]  is downright criminal. So the question is what do we do about it? Well as is always the question
[10:51.200 --> 10:56.000]  you're only going to go as far as you're willing to go to do something about it and most people
[10:56.000 --> 11:00.000]  would rather they just go away and leave them alone than actually do something about it.
[11:00.000 --> 11:08.560]  The fact remains however that when you receive one of these letters from these law firms
[11:09.760 --> 11:14.240]  they're not as protected in that letter as they think they are and want you to believe
[11:14.240 --> 11:23.840]  they are and as they used to be. Why? Because in 1986 the United States Congress took away
[11:23.840 --> 11:31.280]  their protection under the FDCPA the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Attorneys are no longer
[11:31.280 --> 11:38.720]  blanket exempted from the requirements of the FDCPA when it comes to collection of a debt.
[11:40.720 --> 11:48.800]  Specifically the case that set this precedent was Heinz, H-E-I-N-T-Z versus Jenkins,
[11:48.800 --> 12:03.040]  514 U.S. 291 in 1995. Now that was the case that set the precedent but the Congress actually
[12:03.040 --> 12:13.680]  repealed it nine years earlier in 1986 and this was the first time anybody took it to court and
[12:13.680 --> 12:18.720]  challenged it apparently at least all the way to the United States Supreme Court.
[12:21.520 --> 12:30.560]  And in this precedent it says very clearly that the FDCPA now directly applies to attorneys who
[12:30.560 --> 12:36.240]  regularly engage in consumer debt collection activity even when that activity consists of
[12:36.240 --> 12:44.800]  litigation. Well there's the caveat there. First off there is no valid debt because there is no
[12:44.800 --> 12:52.320]  valid judgment, there is no valid conviction, there was no valid trial, there was no valid plea
[12:52.320 --> 13:05.040]  of guilty or no low contender or no contest. So there cannot be a legitimate debt. So if they're
[13:05.040 --> 13:12.560]  engaging in regular debt collection even when the debt involves litigation what happens when
[13:12.560 --> 13:18.400]  they're attempting to collect the debt for which there's never been any litigation because it's a
[13:18.400 --> 13:28.240]  criminally induced debt that is the result of a criminal conviction that has never been done.
[13:28.240 --> 13:39.760]  You get this? So there cannot possibly be any way no matter how they want to argue this
[13:40.640 --> 13:48.480]  that they are protected by the FDCPA for attempting to collect a debt because there is
[13:48.480 --> 13:59.680]  no debt if there is no conviction judgment order if there is no inter plea of guilty or no contest
[13:59.680 --> 14:09.680]  and the fines already been paid. There's none of that. Even if you file paperwork saying I'm
[14:09.680 --> 14:15.120]  going to challenge this, I'm going to fight this, if they've never gone to trial they don't have a
[14:15.120 --> 14:21.680]  conviction, they can't have a judgment without the conviction, they can't have fines and fees
[14:21.680 --> 14:29.040]  without a judgment. The fines and fees are what comprise the alleged debt which cannot exist
[14:29.040 --> 14:34.960]  without the judgment, which cannot exist without the conviction, which cannot exist without due
[14:34.960 --> 14:47.600]  process which requires having a trial or entering a plea of guilty or no contest. Get it? So everything
[14:47.600 --> 14:53.920]  these attorneys firms are doing in relation to collection of these kinds of debts is patent fraud.
[14:55.920 --> 15:04.080]  It is fraud perpetrated via the United States mail. It is conspiracy to commit fraud because
[15:04.080 --> 15:10.960]  guaranteed this law firm employs at least two people. Then there is the aspect of the court
[15:10.960 --> 15:19.680]  itself sending the information to the law firm to collect a debt that the court originally knows
[15:19.680 --> 15:29.760]  is invalid. And the court will get a portion of the money that law firm collects.
[15:29.760 --> 15:41.280]  Folks, that's the very definition of RICO. Get it?
[15:45.840 --> 15:51.200]  If one of them is committing a felony and the others are assisting them in the commission
[15:51.200 --> 16:03.040]  of that felony, which mail fraud is a felony, abuse of process in the state of Texas is a felony.
[16:08.800 --> 16:16.720]  Why are we pursuing this? Now along those lines, I sat down and I wrote up a reply letter to these
[16:16.720 --> 16:24.400]  law firms who send out these, and this reply letter I posted up on Facebook. I give it out
[16:24.400 --> 16:30.240]  if people want it, but it will be part of the seminar material as well. But the simple fact of
[16:30.240 --> 16:38.960]  the matter is that these law firms are knowingly and willfully engaging in criminal conduct by
[16:38.960 --> 16:47.200]  sending out the debt collection notice in violation of the FDCPA, the requirement that they comply
[16:47.200 --> 16:51.280]  with the laws of the United States and of the state in which they operate, and that they don't
[16:51.280 --> 16:58.320]  commit fraud in their activities and their guilty of violating all of it. We'll be right back. Y'all hang on.
[16:58.320 --> 17:10.000]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.000 --> 17:16.640]  Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps
[17:16.640 --> 17:22.560]  to keep us on the air. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes
[17:22.560 --> 17:30.160]  Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.160 --> 17:36.240]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie
[17:36.240 --> 17:42.320]  Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network,
[17:42.320 --> 17:47.840]  support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio
[17:47.840 --> 17:54.080]  today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation
[17:54.080 --> 17:59.360]  is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.560 --> 18:05.040]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.600 --> 18:11.280]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method. Michael Mearris has won six cases
[18:11.280 --> 18:16.080]  in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[18:16.080 --> 18:21.120]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.120 --> 18:26.800]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.800 --> 18:31.360]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them
[18:31.360 --> 18:37.520]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to
[18:37.520 --> 18:42.480]  stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[18:42.480 --> 18:47.680]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email
[18:47.680 --> 18:57.600]  MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com
[18:57.600 --> 19:13.280]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.600 --> 19:53.360]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[19:53.360 --> 19:59.360]  I'm hoping everyone out there can hear me okay. I didn't get a chance to do a sound
[19:59.360 --> 20:04.560]  check before the show tonight, so we'll see. But in any case, I want to go through this debt
[20:04.560 --> 20:09.680]  collection letter really quick, and I actually wrote this in response to someone posting on
[20:09.680 --> 20:15.600]  Facebook about getting one of these very notices from such a law firm here in Texas.
[20:15.600 --> 20:23.840]  So here's the way you write the body of this response to them.
[20:24.480 --> 20:29.920]  Dear sir or madam, in response to your debt collection communication letter sent via the
[20:29.920 --> 20:35.360]  United States Postal Mail Service dated on this month, day, and year, under the terms and conditions
[20:35.360 --> 20:41.520]  of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, FDCPA, I have good reason to believe and do
[20:41.520 --> 20:48.640]  believe that your firm is acting as a debt collector for the city of whomever and that your
[20:48.640 --> 20:53.680]  letter is a communication made exclusively for the collection of an alleged debt.
[20:54.960 --> 20:58.560]  Okay, so that's how we start this off and set the tone.
[21:01.520 --> 21:08.400]  The United States Supreme Court has previously held that the United States Congress amended
[21:08.400 --> 21:17.280]  the FDCPA in 1986 to remove the blanket exception for attorneys. Thus, the FDCPA now directly
[21:17.280 --> 21:21.840]  applies to attorneys who regularly engage in consumer debt collection activity,
[21:21.840 --> 21:27.840]  even when that activity consists of litigation, Heinz versus Jenkins. An attorney who is regularly
[21:27.840 --> 21:33.360]  engaged directly and indirectly in the collection of debts is a debt collector under the FDCPA,
[21:33.360 --> 21:41.200]  Kistner versus Law Offices of Michael P. Marjoleski, LLC, and Gathering versus Murders Incorporated.
[21:41.840 --> 21:48.080]  Therefore, I must presume that all FDCPA debt collection requirements apply to your firm
[21:48.080 --> 21:54.720]  and your firm's debt collection letter as a matter of law. Therefore, as your communication
[21:54.720 --> 22:00.400]  clearly violates numerous mandatory requirements for such debt collection communications under
[22:00.400 --> 22:07.600]  the FDCPA on its face, I must presume that your intentions are to knowingly and willfully act
[22:07.600 --> 22:14.480]  in violation of said act, existing Texas law, and both the due process and consumer rights
[22:14.480 --> 22:21.280]  of the individual to whom it is addressed. As no due process via any sort of fair and impartial
[22:21.280 --> 22:26.240]  trial has been afforded the individual to whom your unlawful communication is directed,
[22:26.240 --> 22:32.880]  and no adjudication has been had, nor any signed order of conviction and judgment having been
[22:32.880 --> 22:40.160]  subsequently issued, no valid judgment, much less any kind of judgment related debt, can possibly
[22:40.160 --> 22:46.880]  legally exist. These are simply the facts. As attorneys practicing law within the state of
[22:46.880 --> 22:52.640]  Texas, you both could have known and should have known that Texas law requires the existence of
[22:52.640 --> 22:59.760]  a post-conviction order signed by the judge of the court, even for Class C fine only convictions,
[22:59.760 --> 23:05.920]  which I am absolutely certain your records do not contain as no such order could have been
[23:05.920 --> 23:11.680]  lawfully issued without a guilty plea or conviction at trial, neither of which has occurred.
[23:12.960 --> 23:17.600]  As attorneys, these are things you are required to know and account for in the course of your
[23:17.600 --> 23:22.400]  actions. The most important of which is that you act in full compliance with the law and the
[23:22.400 --> 23:28.160]  individual rights of the public. However, it would appear that your firm would rather engage in
[23:28.160 --> 23:34.000]  perpetrating fraud upon the public by knowingly and willingly demanding payment of a non-existent
[23:34.000 --> 23:40.560]  and legally invalid debt. Therefore, I hereby demand that you immediately provide me with
[23:40.560 --> 23:46.960]  certified copies of all documentary proof of the alleged final judgment and its associated debt
[23:46.960 --> 23:54.560]  that you are claiming exists and are attempting to collect. Be further advised absent your firm
[23:54.560 --> 24:00.080]  making every possible effort to provide me the requested certified records and other documents
[24:00.080 --> 24:09.280]  required by and pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 45.041d and 45.047
[24:09.280 --> 24:18.160]  as and the FDCPA as expeditiously as possible and these records proving the existence of
[24:18.160 --> 24:23.840]  a legally proper criminal conviction and signed judgment order necessary for the creation of
[24:23.840 --> 24:29.840]  the alleged judgment debt. Your unlawful communication must and will be viewed as a
[24:29.840 --> 24:35.280]  knowing and willful act of attempted mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud
[24:35.280 --> 24:41.520]  by use of the United States Postal Mail, a federal offense, as well as being sufficient
[24:41.520 --> 24:46.560]  grounds to pursue the filing of an FDCPA lawsuit against your firm and its officers.
[24:47.440 --> 24:52.240]  Should you fail to provide the requested verifiable documentary evidence proving the
[24:52.240 --> 24:57.520]  existence of the alleged debt you claim to have been contracted to collect within 10 business
[24:57.520 --> 25:02.480]  days from the receipt of this written demand for validation, a copy of your communication will
[25:02.480 --> 25:07.840]  be forwarded to the United States Department of Justice and the Office of the Postmaster General
[25:07.840 --> 25:13.040]  accompanied by a sworn criminal complaint, wherein the allegation will be made that your
[25:13.040 --> 25:19.120]  law firm is believed to be engaging in deceptive trade practices, mail fraud, conspiracy to
[25:19.120 --> 25:25.360]  commit mail fraud, and knowing and willful violations of not only the FDCPA but also the
[25:25.360 --> 25:30.080]  due process rights of the individual to whom you have directed the communication regarding the
[25:30.080 --> 25:36.400]  alleged debt as well as the rules of professional ethics and conduct. Again, you have 10 business
[25:36.400 --> 25:40.800]  days from the date of receipt of this reply to provide the requested records and documents
[25:40.800 --> 25:46.320]  validating the existence of the alleged debt. No further communication from your firm or any
[25:46.320 --> 25:52.640]  agent thereof shall be accepted by any means other than certified mail service via the United
[25:52.640 --> 25:58.160]  States Postal Mail Service. Then you sign this letter using a formal business form and be sure
[25:58.160 --> 26:06.480]  it is mailed back to the law firm certified mail return receipt requested. This is how we should
[26:06.480 --> 26:17.920]  be responding. Of course, people aren't doing it. No one's doing it even though that's what we
[26:17.920 --> 26:27.600]  should be doing. But folks, if you're not paying attention to what's going on around you in relation
[26:27.600 --> 26:35.440]  to these kinds of activities and those that are occurring everywhere in every state by the powers
[26:35.440 --> 26:43.040]  that be, how in the world do you ever expect to remain free? How do you expect to even understand
[26:43.040 --> 26:50.400]  what freedom and liberty are supposed to mean in relation to Americans as a whole and as individuals?
[26:50.400 --> 27:01.040]  Right now, there has been so much indoctrination that you will literally get torn to pieces in a
[27:01.040 --> 27:07.680]  crowd of people by saying that the cops are doing something wrong if the crowd you're in happens to
[27:07.680 --> 27:15.760]  be full of cop lovers. To those kinds of people, worship cops. They can do no wrong. And I'm telling
[27:15.760 --> 27:21.600]  you, they're dangerous and they're dangerous because of that mindset. They're as dangerous as
[27:21.600 --> 27:27.920]  liberals when it comes to your rights and freedoms. They can say they're patriotic and support
[27:27.920 --> 27:35.680]  freedom and liberty all they want. But when they are willing to hold up cops as inexcusably perfect,
[27:36.320 --> 27:40.960]  no matter what they do wrong and how they do it and make excuses for them, say,
[27:40.960 --> 27:50.160]  oh, it's just that one. It's not all of them. Baloney. The mafia does not stay in existence.
[27:57.680 --> 28:07.280]  They don't stay in existence just because there are people in the mafia who are not actually
[28:07.280 --> 28:15.440]  pulling the trigger to snuff out people. The mafia doesn't remain in existence in control of what it
[28:15.440 --> 28:22.880]  does by making excuses for its members who screw up and for who fail and what they were assigned
[28:22.880 --> 28:30.720]  to do, et cetera, et cetera. So it doesn't matter how many people in the mafia want to make the
[28:30.720 --> 28:37.360]  excuse that I never engaged in the murder of anybody. I never gave an order to hit somebody,
[28:37.920 --> 28:44.560]  you know, et cetera, et cetera. You also never informed on someone who was going to murder
[28:44.560 --> 28:51.440]  someone or who has murdered someone or who is doing other illegal activities, did you?
[28:51.440 --> 29:02.800]  You're still a part of the mafia. Whether you wish to recognize yourself as part of that or not,
[29:02.800 --> 29:11.040]  you are. You're either its participant or its protector in that regard. And when it comes to
[29:11.040 --> 29:17.840]  cops, that's the only two categories in which you can live. You're either a direct participant
[29:17.840 --> 29:26.640]  in all the wrongdoing or you are in the silent background doing nothing to stop it.
[29:31.040 --> 29:37.440]  Okay? Because you learn from experience that those who try to stop the criminality of the even more
[29:37.440 --> 29:44.800]  organized crime that is law enforcement in good old America these days, the more likely you are
[29:44.800 --> 29:57.840]  to get some of that old fashioned mafia accountability. Huh? Your cowards, your total cowards.
[30:02.400 --> 30:07.280]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the
[30:07.280 --> 30:12.800]  blood alcohol limit. Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers
[30:12.800 --> 30:19.360]  in a government cover up in a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[30:19.360 --> 30:24.240]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[30:24.240 --> 30:30.080]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[30:30.080 --> 30:35.440]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to
[30:35.440 --> 30:41.680]  you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start
[30:41.680 --> 30:49.040]  over with start page. Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops find innocent people to
[30:49.040 --> 30:53.840]  bring in revenue and it's apparently big business in the sunshine state of Florida.
[30:53.840 --> 30:59.840]  This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.840 --> 31:05.200]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. State officials
[31:05.200 --> 31:09.680]  knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing. In fact, the head of Florida's
[31:09.680 --> 31:15.920]  breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem. A DUI conviction can ruin
[31:15.920 --> 31:20.960]  somebody's life but now that the cover up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe
[31:20.960 --> 31:26.560]  a bit easier. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.800 --> 31:36.240]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.240 --> 31:41.760]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:41.760 --> 31:46.080]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[31:46.080 --> 31:50.880]  and thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[31:50.880 --> 31:55.280]  engineer. I'm a New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.280 --> 32:00.640]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.640 --> 32:06.320]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.320 --> 32:10.160]  we live in an us against them society. If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.160 --> 32:14.240]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[32:14.240 --> 32:18.240]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[32:18.240 --> 32:22.640]  the right to due process of law. The traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[32:22.640 --> 32:26.800]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy
[32:26.800 --> 32:30.720]  Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching
[32:30.720 --> 32:34.960]  tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule
[32:34.960 --> 32:39.520]  of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com
[32:39.520 --> 32:42.880]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.880 --> 32:47.440]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Life, video and audio of the original 2009
[32:47.440 --> 32:51.280]  seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to
[32:51.280 --> 32:55.200]  fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com. Order your
[32:55.200 --> 32:58.800]  copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.920 --> 33:34.880]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:34.880 --> 33:40.800]  If you want to call and get in line. Now, one last thing. Another recent event in the news
[33:41.600 --> 33:50.000]  is out of Tucson, Arizona, the Pima County Sheriff's Department. You have what appears to be a fat
[33:50.000 --> 33:59.120]  slob of a deputy pumbling and laying on top of a 15-year-old quadriplegic in the hallway of a
[33:59.120 --> 34:10.480]  group home. Now, he has no reason to assault this kid, which the video of the event clearly shows.
[34:10.480 --> 34:15.440]  There's no way for this kid to be attacking him, to run away from him, to do anything other than
[34:15.440 --> 34:22.880]  raise his voice at this deputy. Who, of course, takes a personal affront to having a 15-year-old
[34:22.880 --> 34:28.800]  raise his voice to him because he is such a professional that he is so far above all that
[34:28.800 --> 34:38.080]  that his wrath should be allowed to take precedent over anything else in the situation when he feels
[34:38.080 --> 34:45.200]  disrespected as a police officer. So what does he do? He physically assaults the 15-year-old
[34:45.200 --> 34:56.000]  quadriplegic in the hallway for eight minutes. Curses at him, shoves him, screams in his face.
[34:56.000 --> 35:02.800]  Now, remember, this is a group home. The kids here are already under a lot of stress and strain
[35:02.800 --> 35:07.440]  to even be there. Yes, some of them are there because they did things wrong. Some of them,
[35:07.440 --> 35:13.200]  however, are not, and yet this deputy is treating everybody in here as if they're a hard case criminal,
[35:15.520 --> 35:23.360]  including the quadriplegic. Now, fortunately, the only video that exists of this assault
[35:24.880 --> 35:33.280]  is by another kid who was also in the group home who began secretly recording this encounter when
[35:33.280 --> 35:37.840]  this cop was doing this, and there was two cops there. And like I was saying before we went to
[35:37.840 --> 35:44.080]  break, I don't care if you're a direct participant. When you are doing nothing to stop it, nothing to
[35:44.080 --> 35:50.720]  report it, and nothing to make the individual doing it stop, you are every bit as guilty and
[35:50.720 --> 35:58.240]  culpable as they are. And that's exactly what happened in this case. Now, the second cop knows
[35:58.240 --> 36:04.240]  that the kid recording, after they find out he is recording, has done absolutely nothing wrong,
[36:04.240 --> 36:08.960]  other than when the cop screams in the face of the quadriplegic to shut the F up,
[36:11.120 --> 36:19.280]  he'll scream in his face if he wants to, and the kid recording while he was standing in the hallway
[36:19.280 --> 36:22.880]  eating his cereal because they're not allowed apparently according to what he tells his cop
[36:22.880 --> 36:35.120]  to eat food in their rooms, that the quadriplegic kid was asked a question by the cop, and the kid
[36:35.120 --> 36:39.680]  responded to the cop, and then the cop got in his face and screamed at him and told him to shut up.
[36:40.800 --> 36:45.440]  And this kid said all he did was answer your question. So the cop turns on the kid recording
[36:45.440 --> 36:49.840]  and starts screaming at him to go to his room and leave and all this kind of stuff, which he has no
[36:49.840 --> 37:00.320]  legitimate authority to do. And the kid says he's eating, he can't go to his room. So the cop then
[37:00.320 --> 37:07.680]  gets up and tells this kid that he's arresting him as well as the quadriplegic kid. He's going to
[37:07.680 --> 37:12.160]  charge them both with disturbing the peace, a complete and total falsehood from the word go,
[37:12.160 --> 37:15.040]  but he's going to get away with it at least for the time being.
[37:15.040 --> 37:24.560]  So when he turns the kid around and the second officer is helping him to handcuff a kid,
[37:24.560 --> 37:33.440]  he knows has done absolutely nothing wrong. The first deputy grabs the kid by the head
[37:33.440 --> 37:48.640]  and slams it into the wall, which is also recorded. No provocation, no warning, no need to do so,
[37:48.640 --> 37:54.480]  no resistance from the kid. The deputy just grabs him and slams his head as hard as he can into the
[37:54.480 --> 38:02.880]  wall. And the other deputy stands there and lets it happen. And then takes the kid that just got
[38:02.880 --> 38:12.000]  his head slammed into the wall, out into a patrol car and locks him in it. Like I said,
[38:12.800 --> 38:18.640]  you're either a knowing and willing participant or you're covering for those who are.
[38:22.240 --> 38:28.000]  There is no in between, there is no if and so but you cannot keep your nose clean
[38:28.000 --> 38:33.040]  when these are the things that you do. You can't be a good cop.
[38:38.720 --> 38:44.160]  All these patriots out here that are saying it's an oxymoron to say sovereign citizen.
[38:44.160 --> 38:48.240]  Let me tell you what's a bigger oxymoron, the phrase good cop.
[38:48.240 --> 38:59.200]  Can't be one, impossible, cannot be done.
[39:01.440 --> 39:10.240]  Okay, so given that, how long you think this deputy is going to get? They put him on administrative
[39:10.240 --> 39:16.240]  leave months after this happened and somebody finally brought the video in which was some public
[39:16.240 --> 39:22.560]  defenders. They finally put this cop on administrative leave, which means he's going to get a paid
[39:22.560 --> 39:33.040]  vacation. But what do you think is going to actually happen to him? Something is very, very wrong
[39:34.640 --> 39:43.280]  in these United States of America when we the people must endure these kinds of actions
[39:43.280 --> 39:48.960]  by those who are supposed to serve and protect us and those who are supposed to serve us in
[39:48.960 --> 40:01.760]  general as their bosses. When their policy can be written in a way that allows actions like this to
[40:01.760 --> 40:11.280]  occur in violation of our individual rights rather than the courts upholding the Bill of Rights over
[40:11.280 --> 40:22.720]  any sort of policy. This is the government legitimizing its own criminal conduct to gain
[40:22.720 --> 40:29.120]  the upper hand over the people it was put in place to serve. And this has been going on
[40:29.120 --> 40:38.560]  since day one. Since day one, the metamorphosis has been ongoing to convert us back into something
[40:38.560 --> 40:44.480]  we're not supposed to be and that the initial revolution set us free from being.
[40:50.080 --> 40:55.200]  But it's like trying to climb up a grease lag pole apparently because we're sliding right back to
[40:55.200 --> 41:03.760]  the bottom and starting right back over from ground zero except now it is a thousand times worse.
[41:03.760 --> 41:18.240]  Because there's more of them and there's less of us that know it's wrong. And now not only would we
[41:18.240 --> 41:25.280]  have to fight those in power, we would have to fight those that support those in power. Something
[41:25.280 --> 41:31.200]  that had to happen during Revolutionary War II don't get me wrong, but a lot more of the columnists
[41:31.200 --> 41:35.840]  were willing to just stay at home and out of the way and not take sides if they thought they could
[41:35.840 --> 41:41.840]  get away with it. Then there are those that are willing to jump in on the wrong side
[41:44.320 --> 41:47.360]  to stop what is most assuredly coming.
[41:50.720 --> 41:57.760]  Because this cannot remain America the land of the free if this is allowed to continue.
[41:57.760 --> 42:05.120]  There is no way for it to operate like that. No way whatsoever.
[42:09.200 --> 42:17.040]  So ladies and gentlemen, I put it to you. What are you going to do about this?
[42:20.080 --> 42:25.520]  I mean I'm doing what I can here. I'm helping as many people as I can fight their individual
[42:25.520 --> 42:30.880]  battles as best I can. I'm trying to provide you with the information. I'm doing the studying,
[42:30.880 --> 42:35.120]  I'm doing the research, I'm doing the radio show, I'm doing the seminar material,
[42:35.120 --> 42:40.320]  I'm doing everything I can possibly do short of having to just pick up a gun and start shooting
[42:42.960 --> 42:46.000]  to get this information out there to you folks
[42:46.000 --> 42:55.760]  so that we can be empowered to work together to change it without having to fire those shots.
[42:57.280 --> 43:02.240]  But I think we have passed that tipping point to be honest. I don't think we're going to get
[43:02.240 --> 43:08.560]  this back to any form of what they would consider a legitimate means because they control
[43:08.560 --> 43:16.720]  every aspect of that means and because of that they can morph anything we do into any outcome
[43:16.720 --> 43:21.120]  they want and there's not a thing in the world we are going to be able to do to change that.
[43:21.680 --> 43:27.120]  So the only way to change it is to take control and power away from them which they will not
[43:27.120 --> 43:35.840]  give up willingly. They never have. No government in the history of mankind ever has freely given
[43:35.840 --> 43:43.760]  up any powers managed to get its hands on. Never. It's never ever happened. It has always been a
[43:43.760 --> 43:52.320]  fight. It has always required bloodshed or force. One of the two, if not both. Okay, so y'all hang
[43:52.320 --> 43:57.920]  on. We're going to take this break and I'll come back and start taking your calls. 512-646-1984.
[43:57.920 --> 44:07.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.280 --> 44:13.680]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:13.680 --> 44:19.840]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a
[44:19.840 --> 44:25.840]  lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course
[44:25.840 --> 44:32.640]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[44:32.640 --> 44:38.080]  winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[44:38.080 --> 44:44.000]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our
[44:44.000 --> 44:52.080]  audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[44:52.080 --> 45:00.080]  Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.360 --> 45:06.240]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so
[45:06.240 --> 45:10.880]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without
[45:10.880 --> 45:16.160]  logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[45:16.160 --> 45:20.720]  but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on
[45:20.720 --> 45:27.120]  supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon,
[45:27.120 --> 45:32.080]  you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your
[45:32.080 --> 45:39.520]  cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and book market. Now when you
[45:39.520 --> 45:46.240]  order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do
[45:46.240 --> 45:52.720]  I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow.
[45:52.720 --> 45:59.040]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are
[45:59.040 --> 46:16.640]  Logos. Happy Holidays Logos.
[46:29.280 --> 46:44.640]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. The call in number 512646 1984.
[46:46.000 --> 46:51.920]  All right, that's it. Let me get this music here turning around and we'll just start taking calls.
[46:51.920 --> 47:01.200]  All right, first up is Larry in Arizona. Larry, what can we do for you? Good evening, Eddie.
[47:02.240 --> 47:08.720]  Eddie, I've been listening to your archives and I was calling about a conversation you had with a
[47:08.720 --> 47:19.040]  gentleman a couple of months ago on a land patent. But your monologue ran so parallel to the way they
[47:19.040 --> 47:26.800]  are trying to tax my federally patented property. Can I use any of that material that you were
[47:26.800 --> 47:35.280]  telling us today against a county tax collector? I don't know. I don't know specifically what
[47:35.280 --> 47:39.840]  all you're referring to and what I said. You got to remember when I do these shows or I do
[47:39.840 --> 47:46.480]  presentations, I very, very, very rarely ever prepare this stuff in advance and everything I
[47:46.480 --> 47:52.400]  say and do is completely off the top of my head in the moment. I react to what comes out of my
[47:52.400 --> 47:58.880]  mouth and what comes out of the audience and that's it. I cannot for the life of me tell you
[47:58.880 --> 48:02.640]  nine times out of ten anything I said during the entire sequence of events.
[48:04.880 --> 48:10.080]  Literally, I just can't do it. I do not commit it to memory. It's coming from memory and therefore
[48:10.080 --> 48:19.680]  it's not going back in. Okay. Can I use a debt validation letter against a county tax collector?
[48:19.680 --> 48:25.520]  Okay. You mean the FDCPA stuff? No. Property taxes do not fall into the FDCPA.
[48:26.880 --> 48:34.960]  Okay. Okay. In this archive, you said a few things I didn't fully understand.
[48:34.960 --> 48:43.680]  You're talking about, you're telling this gentleman, Eric, you know, how about his land patent and you
[48:43.680 --> 48:52.560]  said there's a, they are violating prohibition on a variety of rights by trying to tax his land
[48:52.560 --> 48:59.440]  patent. Now, I understand we have a right to own property. Okay. Hold on. Hold on. Okay. There's
[48:59.440 --> 49:06.400]  two things at issue here in relation to the land patents and the property taxes. Okay. The first
[49:06.400 --> 49:12.560]  and foremost issue is breach of contract. That land patent is a binding contract upon the state
[49:12.560 --> 49:17.120]  and or the federal government and any subsequent errors in the signs of that federal government,
[49:17.120 --> 49:25.600]  which is the state of Arizona, when it comes to that property. Okay. So if it says that the person
[49:25.600 --> 49:34.640]  under whose control it originally was relinquishes all claims and titles forever to the person named
[49:34.640 --> 49:42.160]  in the patent, then there is no question that that binding contract prohibits them from ever
[49:42.160 --> 49:49.760]  having any control over that land again. Okay. Okay. Wait, wait. Back up a little bit here.
[49:49.760 --> 49:58.480]  Let's clarify this. Okay. Arizona was not a state. I know that all the land grants under patent in
[49:58.480 --> 50:06.000]  Arizona were federal. I know that. Oh, okay. Okay. So if the federal government gave it away
[50:06.000 --> 50:14.000]  via patent before Arizona became a state, even if it that territory now lies within the territorial
[50:14.000 --> 50:21.120]  boundaries of Arizona, it's the rights and privileges afforded the owner passed to the state of Arizona.
[50:21.120 --> 50:30.880]  How? It should have never passed to them. It didn't with the pain of title. How could it? How could it
[50:30.880 --> 50:41.920]  have? The government waived the federal government waived all rights to the land when they gave away
[50:41.920 --> 50:47.840]  the patent. True? Okay. That was another question. No. Wait a minute. Answer the question. Follow
[50:47.840 --> 50:57.360]  along. Play the game. True? Okay. When they gave the land via patent to the heirs and assigns
[50:58.160 --> 51:04.320]  and the person named in the patent, they relinquish all claims and titles to that land forever,
[51:04.320 --> 51:12.400]  then all rights to that land in every form and fashion passed to the person named in the patent.
[51:12.400 --> 51:23.760]  True? Yes. Okay. So if the federal government then authorizes the creation of a new state called
[51:23.760 --> 51:29.120]  Arizona and says these are your territorial boundaries,
[51:29.120 --> 51:40.560]  how then can they take land that they've already relinquished claim to and say we are also giving
[51:40.560 --> 51:54.320]  you this so you can tax it? Okay. I'll follow that. And considering that they have no rights to the
[51:54.320 --> 52:00.880]  state of Arizona for the purpose of taxation, how then did Arizona get it? The only way they could
[52:00.880 --> 52:09.440]  have gotten it was either by a law that allowed someone to put their land up for taxing purposes
[52:09.440 --> 52:16.480]  for the course of drawing out money to finance a particular piece of legislation,
[52:17.520 --> 52:22.320]  okay, which is what the property taxes are supposed to be when it comes from private
[52:22.320 --> 52:28.960]  landowners. If they want to vote yes on some financial item that the government wants and
[52:28.960 --> 52:36.160]  needs money for, they offer up a parcel of their land of X value and they agree to pay X value in
[52:36.160 --> 52:43.200]  taxes or surrender the land for the purposes of sale to pay those taxes. It's a pledge.
[52:45.600 --> 52:50.640]  But if they don't make that pledge and they don't make an agreement to make that pledge,
[52:50.640 --> 52:58.400]  then the state of Arizona has no legitimate claim to the land on which they live and hold
[52:58.400 --> 53:03.120]  title under the patent to do anything any more than the federal government does.
[53:05.920 --> 53:17.440]  Okay. So since that is a contract between the original patent holder and all their
[53:17.440 --> 53:27.840]  heirs and assigns forever, then they can sue for breach of contract when the government attempts
[53:27.840 --> 53:33.600]  to do something. See, the state of Arizona is not even a party to that agreement. They have no standing
[53:33.600 --> 53:45.280]  to be a party to that agreement. Okay. Okay, but no one is suing the state of Arizona for an
[53:45.280 --> 53:51.360]  attempted breach of contract or a conversion. That's an even better. It's a form of fraud.
[53:52.000 --> 53:57.520]  They're attempting to convert privately held land under a patent from the federal government
[53:57.520 --> 54:05.920]  into state owned and taxable land. That's conversion. That's fraud.
[54:05.920 --> 54:20.480]  Okay. Okay. Now, in the archive, you had mentioned that it also violates a provision
[54:20.480 --> 54:27.200]  of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Wait, say that again?
[54:28.960 --> 54:34.240]  You had said that it violates a provision of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
[54:34.240 --> 54:37.360]  Okay. By violating this contract.
[54:39.840 --> 54:46.560]  Well, if you'll at that time understand the nexus there. Right. It's a federal nexus.
[54:48.800 --> 54:54.880]  The state has no power to legislate in an area that is under the control of the federal government
[54:55.920 --> 55:01.680]  by constitutional mandate. Okay. Okay. If the federal government
[55:01.680 --> 55:07.440]  had that land as a territory, it was under their mandate, not the states because the state did
[55:07.440 --> 55:13.840]  not exist. The state cannot get that later, which it could not have had to begin with
[55:15.360 --> 55:19.680]  because the entity that controlled it, the federal government had already given it away
[55:19.680 --> 55:29.200]  themselves. That's like us trying to sell Guam to France and England and Japan all at the same time.
[55:29.200 --> 55:36.880]  Okay. After we've already sold it to somebody else, a fourth party.
[55:38.160 --> 55:43.040]  It's the Brooklyn Bridge argument. Now, I got a bridge for you. Is there, I mean,
[55:44.000 --> 55:50.320]  can I do like a declaratory type judgment so I can avoid the 12B6 problem?
[55:50.320 --> 55:57.360]  There can't be a 12B6 as long as there's a legitimate fact issue.
[55:59.120 --> 56:04.560]  A 12B6 dismissal can only be had when there are no legitimate facts because that's a failure
[56:04.560 --> 56:10.880]  to state a claim. If there is an original fact issue of law, then a 12B6 dismissal can't happen.
[56:12.160 --> 56:17.120]  Okay. Okay. So I need a fact. Okay. I need a fact issue. Okay. That didn't understand that.
[56:17.120 --> 56:21.200]  Well, the fact issue is, is the state is attempting to commit fraud and convert
[56:21.200 --> 56:25.840]  private property into taxable property of the state, and they can't do that.
[56:26.800 --> 56:31.520]  That violates the agreement between the patent holder and the federal government,
[56:31.520 --> 56:36.480]  the original holder of the land under that patent, who bequeathed it to the individual
[56:37.120 --> 56:46.320]  via patent forever. All rights, titles, property, everything. They relinquish it to the individual
[56:46.320 --> 56:52.880]  named in the patent. The state cannot intercede in that contract. That's a breach of contract.
[56:52.880 --> 56:59.840]  That's, I forget what the specific legal term for it is, but it's tortuous interference
[56:59.840 --> 57:05.040]  with a contract. That's what it is, tortuous interference with a contract. And your own
[57:05.040 --> 57:13.440]  state constitution forbids your state government from interfering with the obligation of contracts,
[57:13.440 --> 57:16.480]  doesn't it? Yes, it does. There you go.
[57:20.560 --> 57:23.120]  Okay. It's just no one that I talked to believes that.
[57:24.640 --> 57:29.200]  Well, regardless of what they believe, until somebody actually brings up these points and
[57:29.200 --> 57:33.440]  argues them and makes a case with it, you're not going to be able to prove one way or another,
[57:33.440 --> 57:40.000]  whether or not it's the case, are you? That's very true. Very true. Okay. That's, okay. I think,
[57:40.000 --> 57:45.520]  I think you've given me plenty to work with tonight. I have access to Lexus Advanced and I
[57:45.520 --> 57:51.440]  will start doing my searching this evening. All right. Well, good luck. Okay. Well, thank you,
[57:51.440 --> 57:57.840]  Eddie. I sure appreciate it. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. Okay. All right. We have got
[57:57.840 --> 58:02.080]  another break coming up here, our top of the hour break. So we'll be gone for a few minutes,
[58:02.080 --> 58:07.040]  but we shall return. And when we do, we'll start in on the rest of the calls. In the meantime,
[58:07.040 --> 58:15.920]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number. Please go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Take a look at the fundraiser.
[58:16.480 --> 58:23.680]  Please donate whenever and however as much as you can. Every $25 gets you a draw entry into
[58:24.480 --> 58:32.640]  our fundraiser for the prize, which I believe is an AR-15. Also, you must go to ruleoflawradio.com
[58:32.640 --> 58:38.800]  and click on the donations link if you want to make donations directly to us as individual hosts,
[58:38.800 --> 58:43.360]  including me. All right, folks. So hang on. We will be right back after this break.
[58:50.320 --> 58:55.920]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.920 --> 59:01.920]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.920 --> 59:06.080]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.040 --> 59:13.520]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.520 --> 59:19.600]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound
[59:19.600 --> 59:24.800]  passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the
[59:24.800 --> 59:30.800]  word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[59:30.800 --> 59:36.880]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:36.880 --> 59:47.840]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.840 --> 01:00:03.760]  That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:17.840 --> 01:00:25.200]  Oil, Texas Crude, $55.63 of barrel, Brent Crude, $62.47 of barrel, and Crypto in order of market
[01:00:25.200 --> 01:00:37.120]  cap, Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52, Ethereum, $227.26, XRP, Ripple, $0.33, Litecoin, $100.31,
[01:00:37.120 --> 01:00:41.680]  and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of crypto coin.
[01:00:41.680 --> 01:00:52.640]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a tying suitcase bomb, was detonated
[01:00:52.640 --> 01:00:57.680]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade,
[01:00:57.680 --> 01:01:00.480]  killing 10 and entering 40. Today in history.
[01:01:04.720 --> 01:01:09.280]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing
[01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.920]  heaven attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston,
[01:01:13.920 --> 01:01:18.320]  Austin, San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:18.320 --> 01:01:22.880]  new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment
[01:01:22.880 --> 01:01:28.000]  to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:32.640]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:01:32.640 --> 01:01:36.800]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General,
[01:01:36.800 --> 01:01:41.040]  stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana
[01:01:41.040 --> 01:01:45.920]  has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding
[01:01:45.920 --> 01:01:52.560]  of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney in El Paso,
[01:01:52.560 --> 01:01:57.440]  Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:01:57.440 --> 01:02:02.480]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However,
[01:02:02.480 --> 01:02:06.960]  the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[01:02:06.960 --> 01:02:10.960]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.960 --> 01:02:15.440]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with
[01:02:15.440 --> 01:02:24.800]  something, the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified
[01:02:24.800 --> 01:02:30.160]  a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico,
[01:02:30.160 --> 01:02:35.680]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[01:02:35.680 --> 01:02:40.960]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the
[01:02:40.960 --> 01:02:47.680]  shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized
[01:02:47.680 --> 01:03:00.880]  to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is Book Roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:17.840 --> 01:03:29.360]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:29.360 --> 01:03:34.000]  We've got an hour left in the show here, and we are now going to talk to Chris in California.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:39.280]  Chris, what can we do for you? Hey, Eddie, thanks for taking the call here. Hey,
[01:03:39.920 --> 01:03:44.480]  20, I thought that you brought up debt collection because that's kind of where I'm coming from at
[01:03:44.480 --> 01:03:54.640]  this point with an attorney to private practice and civil case and trying to help my old man out
[01:03:54.640 --> 01:04:00.080]  here, 87 years old. He's got some little better dimension, but believe it or not, the guy's still
[01:04:01.280 --> 01:04:06.400]  working. He's a dentist, and although we don't know what's going to happen in the short term,
[01:04:06.400 --> 01:04:14.960]  he just had one of those mini-strokes. He got himself into it with his 90-plus-year-old colleague,
[01:04:15.600 --> 01:04:23.120]  and I sent you an email about it. It's kind of a big drama scene. I just need to know now
[01:04:23.120 --> 01:04:31.440]  that the case has essentially been dismissed. He paid off the guy. The attorney, after getting paid
[01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:37.600]  a whole bunch of money, is coming back for a whole bunch more. If I have any leverage or not,
[01:04:37.600 --> 01:04:45.680]  it's kind of the question to kind of back this guy off and threaten reprisal, bar grievance,
[01:04:45.680 --> 01:04:53.120]  whatever, to kind of even things out a little bit here because he really threw him under the
[01:04:53.120 --> 01:05:00.000]  bus pretty bad. If you were to ever look at the mail, I sent you, it would be pretty egregious.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:07.920]  It was a very frivolous case to begin with. It's something that before I go ahead and take any
[01:05:07.920 --> 01:05:14.400]  action, just get some feedback if it's possible. Well, I haven't had a chance to see your email yet.
[01:05:14.400 --> 01:05:19.840]  I've been kind of heads down on other stuff today, so I haven't even looked at email yet today.
[01:05:20.400 --> 01:05:24.960]  I don't know if I'll have a glimpse or you on this show. I may have to do it next Monday.
[01:05:24.960 --> 01:05:30.640]  Okay. So, it might be worth, back to you in a week or so, huh?
[01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:35.040]  Yeah. I mean, at least that'll give me a chance to look at what you're talking about and everything,
[01:05:35.040 --> 01:05:39.200]  but right now, I couldn't begin to answer anything you'd ask me because I don't have any knowledge
[01:05:39.200 --> 01:05:44.560]  of what we're talking about. Okay. Yeah. Well, just touching base and seeing if it's even a
[01:05:44.560 --> 01:05:50.640]  possibility. I mean, it's always a possibility. I can't make any promises, things being what
[01:05:50.640 --> 01:05:57.040]  they are. No man, no one's promised tomorrow, right? Oh, yeah, no. I don't know what I could even
[01:05:57.040 --> 01:06:06.800]  promise. So, yeah, I'll follow up with you. I appreciate that. A couple other things. I like
[01:06:06.800 --> 01:06:14.240]  kind of hearing your going on about people and how dangerous they can be. There's some stuff
[01:06:14.240 --> 01:06:23.840]  I could share on that, but what I wanted to get into here real quick on of all things because
[01:06:23.840 --> 01:06:30.480]  there's a lot of different stuff here going on. I got a regional park system out here in Cali and
[01:06:30.480 --> 01:06:36.960]  we're all kind of nutty out here. Anyway, these guys apparently is the biggest regional park system
[01:06:36.960 --> 01:06:44.560]  in the whole country and they're looking over what has been described as the greatest, what was
[01:06:44.560 --> 01:06:52.240]  the greatest stand of redwoods in the world. And these guys are kind of that crazy trying to
[01:06:53.120 --> 01:06:59.600]  keep people from using their old historic trails and their old, you know, infrastructure trails
[01:06:59.600 --> 01:07:07.520]  that went to like power lines and things. And their solution is on public land. Yeah, it's a
[01:07:07.520 --> 01:07:12.960]  big system of regional parks throughout this state and apparently it's the biggest in the country.
[01:07:15.520 --> 01:07:23.280]  So, these guys, and I think it has to do with just the number of people coming into these areas that
[01:07:23.280 --> 01:07:28.480]  are undesignated trails, these guys are, because I think they understand the liability issues,
[01:07:28.480 --> 01:07:33.920]  they're getting volunteers to come in and they're just handing them chains. I was saying, look,
[01:07:33.920 --> 01:07:37.920]  you got to close this stuff down. We don't want anyone going through there. And literally, they're
[01:07:38.880 --> 01:07:44.000]  cutting down to try to close these trails with the chains. They're just wiping out the forest in
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:54.240]  certain areas. And of course, the issue now with our fire situation is it's created this fuel load
[01:07:54.240 --> 01:07:59.680]  that they've taken a couple fire department friends out there and their jaws hit the table.
[01:07:59.680 --> 01:08:06.080]  They're like, oh my God, but everybody's too afraid because of the implications, the legal and
[01:08:06.080 --> 01:08:11.600]  the insurance and all that to say anything about it. I've talked to Cal Fire, they're too afraid.
[01:08:11.600 --> 01:08:15.200]  They said, oh my God, and you could hear them rustling the background saying, hey,
[01:08:17.040 --> 01:08:21.040]  you're going to have to go to the press with this. They don't want to touch it with a 20 foot pole.
[01:08:21.040 --> 01:08:30.400]  And just to give you some contrast, the city, because they have their set of parks here,
[01:08:30.400 --> 01:08:35.520]  nowhere near as big as the regional guys, they come out there with their goats and they
[01:08:35.520 --> 01:08:39.680]  clean everything up. And if their tree falls down, they'll clean it up and everything. But the big
[01:08:39.680 --> 01:08:45.520]  boss hogs, the regional guys, they don't care. There's fire or fuel loads coming right up to the
[01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:51.040]  road where their property, the budget, public, their affairs. So I don't know. I imagine it's
[01:08:51.040 --> 01:08:54.880]  not a heck of a lot you could do as a citizen, but I thought I'd run that by you.
[01:08:58.720 --> 01:09:05.440]  Well, I mean, going through bureaucratic channels to report bureaucratic screw ups has never been
[01:09:05.440 --> 01:09:15.040]  a success in my experience. Yeah. I believe the gentleman told you correctly, you need to take
[01:09:15.040 --> 01:09:23.840]  it to the people by taking it through the press. And of course, in a lot of cases, they're pretty
[01:09:23.840 --> 01:09:34.320]  much in bed with the large powers that they, if you want to. Do you have any proof that
[01:09:34.320 --> 01:09:37.680]  what's going on in this park has anything at all to do with the powers that be?
[01:09:37.680 --> 01:09:48.160]  No, no, no. Why would you think that the local news would bury a story like this because of that?
[01:09:49.200 --> 01:09:53.200]  Well, the first thing I expect they would do would be to call the park and the park would say,
[01:09:53.200 --> 01:09:56.960]  oh, no, it's just nothing. You don't need to worry. These guys are just trying to.
[01:09:56.960 --> 01:10:03.040]  So what other evidence and information can you provide them to contradict what the park's people
[01:10:03.040 --> 01:10:08.160]  would tell them so that they can go back and push back and say, well, I've got information here
[01:10:08.160 --> 01:10:14.160]  that says you're telling me a big fiver. Right. Well, it's video, obviously, and you can get out
[01:10:14.160 --> 01:10:17.840]  there and that's that's the issue is getting people involved enough to come out and look at it.
[01:10:19.440 --> 01:10:21.840]  Well, I can't help it. I'm not in California.
[01:10:24.320 --> 01:10:30.800]  Yeah. No, I understand. So any who that was one thing. And then the other issue,
[01:10:30.800 --> 01:10:40.560]  because you were talking about transportation on highways and, of course, as a hunter and off-road,
[01:10:40.560 --> 01:10:48.800]  you know, bike and truck and all that stuff, is there a application or is it all the same with
[01:10:48.800 --> 01:10:53.760]  off-road for, you know, whether you're on a forest service dirt road or you're going on a
[01:10:53.760 --> 01:11:02.240]  on a trail through the woods or commercial use and nothing else is. Okay. And because that's
[01:11:02.240 --> 01:11:09.360]  a big one out here, we have in the same area, we have laws that permit automobile traffic.
[01:11:09.360 --> 01:11:15.200]  If you have a reservation that can't ground. Okay. And it also permits. Okay. Same difference.
[01:11:15.200 --> 01:11:19.520]  Of course. You're talking about two different things. Permitting to have access is not the
[01:11:19.520 --> 01:11:27.440]  same thing as licensing to make use of. Okay. No, I know. I'm probably not explaining it clearly.
[01:11:27.440 --> 01:11:34.000]  But what I'm saying is that existing roads and trails that everybody basically is allowed on
[01:11:35.360 --> 01:11:41.760]  even to drive their automobiles under certain circumstances, they're not allowed to ride a
[01:11:41.760 --> 01:11:48.000]  bicycle. So if you put your bicycle in the back of your car, it's okay to bring your bicycle on
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:53.360]  that trail. But if you put those two wheels on the ground, you're going to be penalized.
[01:11:54.080 --> 01:11:59.120]  Is there a danger to the person on the bicycle from the persons in the cars for doing so?
[01:11:59.920 --> 01:12:08.560]  Oh, no, no. This is just a forest trail that very rarely would have a vehicle, an automobile.
[01:12:08.560 --> 01:12:17.520]  Okay. What is the reason for excluding bikes versus motorized cars?
[01:12:18.400 --> 01:12:22.640]  I believe in the code it talks about environmental damage.
[01:12:23.920 --> 01:12:29.360]  How does a bike create greater environmental damage than a car does with the exception that
[01:12:29.360 --> 01:12:33.440]  the bike can be used to access places the car probably can't?
[01:12:33.440 --> 01:12:39.440]  Well, that's a good question and obviously it doesn't. What's really going on is a similar
[01:12:39.440 --> 01:12:45.200]  situation that occurred at a ski resort where they didn't allow snowboarders because they
[01:12:45.200 --> 01:12:52.560]  just didn't like them. It was a new type of toy and nobody liked them. So they said no snowboards
[01:12:52.560 --> 01:12:58.720]  here. Okay. Well, and so proving that is the basis and saying it's two different things.
[01:12:58.720 --> 01:13:06.000]  My point being that in the case of excluding the bicycle, can the bicycle access parts of that
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:13.360]  trail in a way that a car cannot? And by doing so, could the bicycle cause damage to something
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:22.400]  there that it shouldn't? Yeah, no, that's not possible. Well, you have an argument for fighting
[01:13:22.400 --> 01:13:29.200]  the rules. But again, that's not my area. And it's not my state. So I can't tell you what those
[01:13:29.200 --> 01:13:36.320]  rules are and who to talk to. Yeah. Well, there are obviously the policies and or ordinances.
[01:13:37.120 --> 01:13:42.880]  And I guess that's where you would. Yeah, but what agency and again, I don't
[01:13:43.600 --> 01:13:47.920]  your state agencies are all interlinked differently than they are here most likely.
[01:13:47.920 --> 01:13:55.040]  Right. Yeah, it would be it would be helpful if anyone listening could who wanted to
[01:13:55.760 --> 01:14:01.040]  become involved in that kind of thing, you know, be able to contact and get together.
[01:14:01.040 --> 01:14:07.520]  And but good luck with that. Why don't you try to find chapters of Greenpeace and Pita and all
[01:14:07.520 --> 01:14:11.440]  that out there in California. These are the kinds of things they love to jump in the middle of and
[01:14:11.440 --> 01:14:18.000]  start a ruckus over. Well, I'll tell you what, though, they hate the mountain biking and the
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:22.640]  biking community out here. I mean, that's that's the battle right there. Those are the battle lines,
[01:14:22.640 --> 01:14:28.800]  the environmental groups, and it's upside down like most other things. You know, they're in bed
[01:14:28.800 --> 01:14:34.480]  with the oil companies when it comes to important issues like, you know, all the climate change
[01:14:34.480 --> 01:14:39.760]  BS and not to mention other things like ethanol. This is another one. They they hate the bikers.
[01:14:39.760 --> 01:14:45.360]  And if for all I know, they support the force getting cut down to keep bikers and and others
[01:14:45.360 --> 01:14:51.440]  out. Well, again, then I don't know what else to tell you. Not relation to that stuff.
[01:14:53.040 --> 01:15:03.200]  All right. So let's see, full circle here. Real quick, some some newbie questions on
[01:15:03.200 --> 01:15:10.320]  grievances. Once this case is going back to the case, once once the cases are closed,
[01:15:10.320 --> 01:15:18.320]  what is the statute for for doing bar grievances against private practice attorneys? Is that
[01:15:18.320 --> 01:15:23.360]  something I have a limit on? No, you can bar grievance attorney for anything.
[01:15:24.560 --> 01:15:28.240]  Okay, you can bar grievance attorney for breaking wind in an elevator.
[01:15:28.240 --> 01:15:36.560]  And there we go. I like that one, actually. The other would be the attorney who referred
[01:15:37.760 --> 01:15:43.920]  attorney that my father got. And also the opposing attorney. I mean, these guys,
[01:15:46.240 --> 01:15:49.120]  you know, vulnerable to to the same or
[01:15:51.440 --> 01:15:54.880]  Well, what do you mean? What do you I don't know what you're talking about in relation to the
[01:15:54.880 --> 01:16:03.840]  opposing attorney, the opposing one or lost? Well, it was settled. It was settled in mediation.
[01:16:03.840 --> 01:16:07.520]  Okay, it was settled. So what claim do you have against the other attorney?
[01:16:10.880 --> 01:16:14.480]  He had obviously was involved in the
[01:16:16.400 --> 01:16:21.520]  the the seat and the, you know, take advantage of my phone.
[01:16:21.520 --> 01:16:26.800]  Good to mention. Is this all stuff that hopefully your email explains as to what you're referring
[01:16:26.800 --> 01:16:33.120]  to as a deceit? Yeah, oh, yeah. Okay, then let me read that. We'll discuss it further then.
[01:16:33.840 --> 01:16:39.840]  That'll work. All right, well, I'll probably try next Monday then. Okay. Thanks for calling.
[01:16:42.960 --> 01:16:47.120]  All right, we got another break. And I'll start on the rest of the callers when we get back.
[01:16:47.120 --> 01:16:53.440]  512-646-1984 is a call in number. Y'all hang on and we'll be right back.
[01:17:03.920 --> 01:17:09.280]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[01:17:09.280 --> 01:17:16.080]  Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated.
[01:17:16.080 --> 01:17:19.840]  Everything helps to keep us on the air. From Central Texas Gun Works,
[01:17:19.840 --> 01:17:27.040]  the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.040 --> 01:17:32.560]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win. When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook,
[01:17:32.560 --> 01:17:38.880]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:44.640]  to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep
[01:17:44.640 --> 01:17:50.240]  bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other
[01:17:50.240 --> 01:17:57.520]  cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com
[01:17:57.520 --> 01:18:03.840]  for details and donate today. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls,
[01:18:03.840 --> 01:18:09.840]  letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method. Michael
[01:18:09.840 --> 01:18:15.280]  Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll
[01:18:15.280 --> 01:18:20.560]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights
[01:18:20.560 --> 01:18:26.560]  statute. What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. How to answer letters and phone
[01:18:26.560 --> 01:18:31.600]  calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables on them
[01:18:31.600 --> 01:18:37.760]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to
[01:18:37.760 --> 01:18:42.640]  stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[01:18:42.640 --> 01:18:48.240]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael
[01:18:48.240 --> 01:18:57.760]  Mirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.760 --> 01:19:11.760]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:27.760 --> 01:19:47.760]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is available as well.
[01:19:57.760 --> 01:20:09.760]  All right folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. All right, let's see what else we have up
[01:20:09.760 --> 01:20:17.760]  here. Now we have Tim in Texas. Tim, what do you got? Hello, sir. How are you doing? So far so grand.
[01:20:17.760 --> 01:20:25.760]  Okay. If I misunderstand just because your kind of your volume is kind of low tonight, so. Well, sorry
[01:20:25.760 --> 01:20:30.400]  how's that? All right. Well, I'm sitting here listening to you and my wife comes in said,
[01:20:31.280 --> 01:20:35.920]  honey, we just got a phone call said there's a fire truck up at the shop. You need to go check on
[01:20:35.920 --> 01:20:41.520]  it. So I get in the car and I drive up there when I drive up, I see an ambulance and a police cruiser
[01:20:42.400 --> 01:20:48.880]  for the West County Sheriff's Department and a pickup truck in the car. And so I walk around to
[01:20:48.880 --> 01:20:55.440]  the ambulance door that's opened on the side. And there's a guy standing there, one of the ambulance
[01:20:55.440 --> 01:21:03.040]  guys, and then I could see a couple people inside. And I said, excuse me. And he goes turns around,
[01:21:03.040 --> 01:21:09.520]  looks at me and goes, I said, yeah, I'm the owner of the property here. I says, what's going on?
[01:21:09.520 --> 01:21:14.400]  He goes, we got it handled. And I go, you got it handled. I said, yeah, I said,
[01:21:14.400 --> 01:21:21.520]  don't you think you don't let me know what's going on? And the guy that's inside, he's a
[01:21:21.520 --> 01:21:27.520]  sheriff's deputy, he looks at me and says something. I can't, I mean, those, those ambulances,
[01:21:27.520 --> 01:21:35.680]  those decals, they're loud, man. And anyway, he says later on that he told me three times,
[01:21:35.680 --> 01:21:40.880]  but I swear I couldn't hear him. But what he was telling me was that there's a medical
[01:21:40.880 --> 01:21:47.120]  emergency and we've got it handled. And so I said, well, someone called me
[01:21:48.240 --> 01:21:52.960]  and told me that you guys were here. I said, so I came up to check. He said, well,
[01:21:52.960 --> 01:21:59.760]  they should mind their own business. We got it handled. So I'm like, okay,
[01:22:00.960 --> 01:22:08.320]  we got it handled. I said, so I waited for him. And they came back out. And when the cop came out,
[01:22:08.320 --> 01:22:14.160]  he's talking to me. And he's going, he says, first of all, I told you three times. I said,
[01:22:14.160 --> 01:22:19.040]  well, I can't hear you. It's loud. He said, but he said, I could hear you. I said, yeah,
[01:22:19.040 --> 01:22:24.400]  but you're inside an ambulance. I'm outside next to the engine. And I can't hardly hear you, you
[01:22:24.400 --> 01:22:33.120]  know. So we were having that little discussion. And then he says, then he keeps telling me,
[01:22:33.120 --> 01:22:38.400]  I asked first to ask him for a card. He said he didn't have a card. And I thought they always
[01:22:38.400 --> 01:22:46.080]  carried cards, but I guess not. And he told me his name, Fitzgerald. And I didn't recognize him
[01:22:46.640 --> 01:22:51.040]  because he looks like he put on about 30 pounds. Wouldn't Benny Fitzgerald, was it?
[01:22:52.400 --> 01:22:55.840]  I don't think so. Sergeant Fitzgerald, Wise County Sheriff's Department.
[01:22:55.840 --> 01:23:03.920]  Anyway, go ahead. Do you know him? Well, if his first name is Benny, I know him. That's why I
[01:23:03.920 --> 01:23:14.720]  was asking. No, I don't think so. No, he's about 40 years old. But anyway, I says, well, I'm Tim
[01:23:14.720 --> 01:23:21.920]  Pixler. He says, I know who you are. And then it clicked. Fitzgerald said, oh, you're the one. He
[01:23:21.920 --> 01:23:27.280]  goes, yeah, I know who you are. He says, yeah, you're the one that filed the little warning against
[01:23:27.280 --> 01:23:35.360]  me. I'm the one that Randy had me file a T-close complaint against him because when they were
[01:23:35.360 --> 01:23:43.520]  taking me to civil court, they then were harassing me again. They wrote me up for another vehicle
[01:23:43.520 --> 01:23:49.040]  out on my property. And so I had to go to court for that. And I was trying to keep from entering
[01:23:49.040 --> 01:23:54.960]  a plea. So I was talking to the prosecutor when they called me up. And I recorded the entire
[01:23:55.520 --> 01:24:02.960]  scenario. And she was getting flustered, but I was not. It's all in the recording. So when I
[01:24:02.960 --> 01:24:10.320]  turn around finally to go back to my seat, he's already made his way up behind my wife. And when
[01:24:10.320 --> 01:24:19.440]  me and him meet eye to eye, he gives me this threatening look. And so I sit down, I'm like, what?
[01:24:19.440 --> 01:24:25.120]  It's just got looking at me like that. And my wife said, sit down before you go to jail, you know.
[01:24:26.240 --> 01:24:30.560]  And I sit there with a pen and a paper. So I just walk up to him and I said, what is your name?
[01:24:31.360 --> 01:24:36.960]  He said, Sergeant Fitzgerald. And he spells it out for me as I write it down. I says, I know,
[01:24:36.960 --> 01:24:41.120]  I'm just trying to get it. Get your name here. He says, I don't care what you're doing. He said the
[01:24:41.120 --> 01:24:50.400]  same exact thing to me tonight. He didn't care what I did. So this guy's got a real, he's real,
[01:24:50.400 --> 01:24:57.440]  I guess he's real upset about the T-close complaint. But I heard you say one night, I believe,
[01:24:57.440 --> 01:25:03.760]  that a T-close complaint doesn't really do much. Yeah, T-close complaint doesn't go into his
[01:25:03.760 --> 01:25:10.720]  department. And because T-close cannot yank a cop certification without going through his department.
[01:25:11.840 --> 01:25:16.160]  Okay. And they can't investigate an officer without going through the officer's department.
[01:25:16.160 --> 01:25:19.440]  So going directly to T-close doesn't do a whole lot. Okay.
[01:25:21.600 --> 01:25:29.520]  Well, you know, for it, the whole point was not that I was out of, you know, I told him,
[01:25:29.520 --> 01:25:34.880]  I said, you realize you're on private property. He said, well, I'm parked in the right of way.
[01:25:34.880 --> 01:25:40.000]  I said, well, okay, but the ambulance is on private property. These two vehicles are on
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:46.080]  private property. Someone was concerned. They called and had me come up. And for you to say that
[01:25:46.080 --> 01:25:50.560]  they should mind their own business and we're a small community, it's really uncalled for.
[01:25:51.200 --> 01:25:56.880]  But he doesn't think so. So you think I'm barking up a wrong tree or do you think I'm trying to
[01:25:56.880 --> 01:26:02.960]  let you need to file an internal affairs complaint for this officer's unprofessional conduct?
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:09.120]  Okay. All right. Now, you know, it's election year.
[01:26:11.200 --> 01:26:17.360]  Then file one against it against the sheriff if he's a deputy for allowing his cops to act like
[01:26:17.360 --> 01:26:28.720]  this. Yeah. This is the Lane Aiken. I think he's a career cop. He was a Texas Ranger. He's pretty
[01:26:28.720 --> 01:26:32.880]  much been, he's a, you know, family man. He's been a pretty, he's a pretty good man, I think.
[01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:40.320]  You hope. That's all I can say. But you did listen to the beginning of this show, right?
[01:26:40.320 --> 01:26:44.160]  Yes, sir. Yeah. You had me. That's why I thought, well, this is really a coincidence,
[01:26:44.160 --> 01:26:50.720]  you know, for me to go up there and to be concerned about what's going on, you know,
[01:26:50.720 --> 01:26:56.960]  I don't have to know the personal stuff that you don't just meet eyes with the owner of a property
[01:26:56.960 --> 01:27:04.080]  and go, this doesn't concern you. First of all, yes, it does. If you're on private property,
[01:27:04.080 --> 01:27:14.080]  you can learn me, right? Is it true? It's true. And then to say the person who told us said, you know,
[01:27:14.080 --> 01:27:19.120]  they need to mind their own business. That's insane to even say that. This guy does not.
[01:27:19.920 --> 01:27:26.160]  I guess sheriff's deputies are probably the least trained of all. Is that correct?
[01:27:27.200 --> 01:27:31.440]  Well, they're the least paid, so they give the least credence to learning anything.
[01:27:31.440 --> 01:27:38.800]  Yeah. I mean, it's just like they have the least motivation to do a good job. Let me put it that
[01:27:38.800 --> 01:27:48.480]  way. That's a good way of putting it. That sure is. Yeah. Oh my God. Well, I've got other things to
[01:27:48.480 --> 01:27:54.560]  say that this fired me up and I was thinking, oh my God, and I tell you what, I can't swear it was him.
[01:27:54.560 --> 01:28:02.640]  I kicked myself. Me and my sons, I've got two younger sons. We had gone downtown Fort Worth.
[01:28:02.640 --> 01:28:10.640]  We were coming home and just as we got into town, there was a police cruiser and I drove by,
[01:28:10.640 --> 01:28:16.240]  they jumped right on my tail and they followed me straight to my driveway and then turned off.
[01:28:16.880 --> 01:28:24.160]  I mean, they were right on my rear. I think it was that Fitzgerald guy because my wife was on
[01:28:24.160 --> 01:28:33.760]  council here and you know, I'm the guy who's the city administrator, got the council fired up on me
[01:28:34.480 --> 01:28:41.760]  and all of this. So there's no telling what he was brainwashed over me about, but when it all
[01:28:41.760 --> 01:28:49.200]  comes down to it, all charges have been dismissed against me. Even the second dairy one where they
[01:28:49.200 --> 01:28:56.080]  took me back into court over another vehicle, that was dropped. But I'm trying to determine now
[01:28:57.120 --> 01:29:02.720]  if all the charges that they had brought against me because you had mentioned earlier in the show
[01:29:04.080 --> 01:29:13.440]  about, I'm trying to talk and my kids are talking. You got kids? I don't want to suffer my dog.
[01:29:13.440 --> 01:29:26.160]  Well, kids are okay. So I'm trying to determine whether or not, oh, Lord, I lost my place. What
[01:29:26.160 --> 01:29:33.200]  was I talking about, Eddie? What are you asking me for? Well, you were listening. You were talking
[01:29:33.200 --> 01:29:36.960]  about the sheriff's deputy's attitude towards you and personal vendetta and that kind of thing.
[01:29:36.960 --> 01:29:44.000]  Yeah, but then I was talking about what you were talking about earlier in the show about the
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:49.920]  cases against me and how I could formulate non-conforming usage. Okay, well, hang on just
[01:29:49.920 --> 01:29:54.000]  a second. Let me get this break out of the way and we'll be right back. All right, folks, y'all hang on.
[01:30:00.640 --> 01:30:04.880]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number,
[01:30:04.880 --> 01:30:09.360]  and date of birth, but you should think twice before giving away your personal data. I'm Dr.
[01:30:09.360 --> 01:30:14.960]  Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment. Google is watching you recording everything
[01:30:14.960 --> 01:30:19.920]  you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information. That's
[01:30:19.920 --> 01:30:25.280]  creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search
[01:30:25.280 --> 01:30:30.160]  engine. Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use
[01:30:30.160 --> 01:30:35.200]  tracking cookies and their third party certified. If you don't like Big Brother spying on you,
[01:30:35.200 --> 01:30:40.800]  start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy. Startpage.com,
[01:30:40.800 --> 01:30:45.440]  the world's most private search engine. Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere,
[01:30:45.440 --> 01:30:49.520]  but just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.520 --> 01:30:55.120]  I laid blank spaces on forms all the time or I write n slash a for not applicable and usually
[01:30:55.120 --> 01:31:00.240]  nobody notices or cares. I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's
[01:31:00.240 --> 01:31:05.360]  absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement and I won't give my phone number to
[01:31:05.360 --> 01:31:09.760]  a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.760 --> 01:31:14.880]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:20.080]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[01:31:20.080 --> 01:31:26.080]  more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.760 --> 01:31:39.040]  I lost my son, my uncle on September 11, 2001. Most people don't know that a third tower fell on
[01:31:39.040 --> 01:31:44.560]  September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. Although the
[01:31:44.560 --> 01:31:50.720]  official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. Over 1,200 architects and engineers
[01:31:50.720 --> 01:31:55.200]  has looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story. Bring justice to my son,
[01:31:55.200 --> 01:32:01.600]  my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go to BuildingWhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:03.280 --> 01:32:07.280]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[01:32:07.280 --> 01:32:11.120]  we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:15.120]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right
[01:32:15.120 --> 01:32:19.280]  to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly
[01:32:19.280 --> 01:32:23.920]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[01:32:23.920 --> 01:32:28.400]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig
[01:32:28.400 --> 01:32:32.000]  in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.560]  of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.560 --> 01:32:43.920]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.920 --> 01:32:48.480]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie. Video and audio of the original 2009
[01:32:48.480 --> 01:32:52.320]  seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to
[01:32:52.320 --> 01:32:56.240]  fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your
[01:32:56.240 --> 01:32:59.840]  copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.840 --> 01:33:10.960]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.840 --> 01:33:46.640]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Caller number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:47.440 --> 01:33:54.960]  All right, let's get back to Tim in Texas. All right, Tim, go ahead. Okay, this all started
[01:33:54.960 --> 01:34:04.400]  about junk vehicles on my property. I'm an auto repair facility and these were unregistered
[01:34:04.400 --> 01:34:11.440]  vehicles so therefore they were presumed and operable also. That's what the statute even calls
[01:34:11.440 --> 01:34:23.760]  for. They tricked me into an administrative hearing and even though on the record it stated
[01:34:23.760 --> 01:34:30.160]  that I requested the administrative hearing, I think you know the story, the writ of mandamus
[01:34:31.520 --> 01:34:36.640]  by the Second Court of Appeals overruled the administrative hearing because it was never
[01:34:36.640 --> 01:34:45.040]  adopted into the municipal ordinances as required by statute. So the main thing that
[01:34:45.040 --> 01:34:54.800]  they took me to court for and got a restraining order was because of irreparable damage and so
[01:34:55.440 --> 01:35:01.920]  I never could really figure out what they meant by irreparable damage. Something irreparable
[01:35:01.920 --> 01:35:08.640]  means that it can't be replaced monetarily so maybe they were talking about loss of life
[01:35:08.640 --> 01:35:16.240]  or something but I mean I'm an auto repair facility you know. So when it comes down to the
[01:35:16.240 --> 01:35:28.080]  non-conforming use issue, if I am a shop that was taken over from another shop that was taken
[01:35:28.080 --> 01:35:33.200]  over from another shop all the way back to its inception right after the incorporation of the
[01:35:33.200 --> 01:35:44.640]  city, what I found out was that the zoning of our town I don't think was started until
[01:35:45.440 --> 01:35:54.000]  year 2000. It was dissected up into the commercial residential mobile homes and things like that
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:04.240]  in industrial and if that's the case then unless they can actually prove through a trial
[01:36:05.120 --> 01:36:10.400]  that I had junked vehicles then they can't really get a restraining order against me
[01:36:11.200 --> 01:36:18.800]  for that. Is that correct? Am I thinking straight? Well the seeking of a restraining order doesn't
[01:36:18.800 --> 01:36:28.960]  require a trial. Right. It may require a hearing but not a trial. Yeah well they it was a I can't
[01:36:28.960 --> 01:36:34.480]  remember what they call it but where only one side is heard for the restraining order yeah
[01:36:35.360 --> 01:36:41.200]  they would have the right to challenge it. Yeah well they had the they had the hearing I think
[01:36:41.200 --> 01:36:49.360]  two weeks later and so I went and of course all I did was challenge subject matter jurisdiction and
[01:36:50.720 --> 01:36:54.800]  the rest of it I just let go. I was kind of how I was instructed to do
[01:36:55.840 --> 01:37:02.400]  and it got us in deep water and eventually they got an $80,000 judgment against me
[01:37:03.040 --> 01:37:08.400]  but looking back at it and people go well why are you even worried with that because you know
[01:37:08.400 --> 01:37:13.040]  that was all dismissed it still worries me because if it ever happens again I want to
[01:37:13.040 --> 01:37:23.040]  know exactly what I need to do but there's parking ordinances where I park on my property
[01:37:23.760 --> 01:37:29.600]  that I can't park off of my property you know like next door I can't park there unless I have a
[01:37:29.600 --> 01:37:40.480]  permit but those are ordinances that were not uh written up until 2009 and so I've been there since
[01:37:40.480 --> 01:37:50.320]  95 and if that's the case then what is it you're wanting to park next door there's a church next
[01:37:50.320 --> 01:37:55.840]  door has no I know what's next door what are you wanting to park there I parked vehicles
[01:37:55.840 --> 01:38:00.000]  ones that are being worked on yeah that's why
[01:38:02.720 --> 01:38:07.120]  that's why that's why they can use the ordinance to do what they're doing
[01:38:08.560 --> 01:38:13.760]  okay even if I've been doing it for the the church is not zoned for the top of use you're
[01:38:13.760 --> 01:38:18.320]  trying to put it to and they're not going to let you working on the cars I'm just parking I know
[01:38:18.320 --> 01:38:23.040]  you're not working on the cars but the cars are in the same condition that require you to work on
[01:38:23.040 --> 01:38:28.400]  them when you park them there is when you're working on them right yeah well there you go
[01:38:28.400 --> 01:38:30.560]  that's exactly how they're going to couch it
[01:38:33.280 --> 01:38:40.480]  huh okay so they're not they're not dismantled
[01:38:43.120 --> 01:38:48.240]  or anything they can make the argument that you're parking inoperable cars in a location
[01:38:48.240 --> 01:38:53.920]  that's not zoned for the parking of inoperable cars to be worked on in a place of business
[01:38:53.920 --> 01:39:00.720]  like what you own then they're going to win that fight guaranteed now if you were trying to park
[01:39:00.720 --> 01:39:06.560]  your car there so you'd have one extra parking space on your property to park the other ones
[01:39:06.560 --> 01:39:11.840]  you're working on that's a whole different ball game well that's that's basically what we do we
[01:39:11.840 --> 01:39:17.600]  park our cars there yeah any car that's there that's operable well we don't put in operable cars
[01:39:17.600 --> 01:39:23.360]  because it's downhill we couldn't get it to up on our property the point is not whether or not it
[01:39:23.360 --> 01:39:27.200]  is inoperable the point is whether or not they can make the argument that it's inoperable
[01:39:27.840 --> 01:39:32.080]  all right and that would start with the unregistered vehicle correct okay
[01:39:33.760 --> 01:39:40.160]  so non-conforming use is out the window wait a minute the state statute never said anything about
[01:39:40.160 --> 01:39:47.280]  it uh the fact that it's not registered doesn't mean make it inoperable now if the
[01:39:47.280 --> 01:39:53.920]  ordinance says that then they have a problem the city is attempting to increase the uh expand the
[01:39:53.920 --> 01:40:00.080]  application of a state law to cover how it wants to use it in an ordinance and it can't do that
[01:40:00.880 --> 01:40:08.480]  well okay the legislation says that they can expand the municipalities can some municipalities
[01:40:08.480 --> 01:40:17.520]  I've seen uh even go as far to say stuff that is totally ridiculous the municipality cannot create
[01:40:17.520 --> 01:40:26.400]  binding public law on private property they cannot do it if there is no state law to build an ordinance
[01:40:26.400 --> 01:40:32.560]  on then their ordinances are limited to their property and their personnel and their contractors
[01:40:32.560 --> 01:40:39.280]  there's been no two ways about that okay anything else is a violation of the state constitution
[01:40:39.840 --> 01:40:48.800]  okay would please do me a favor um I'll ask the question on your uh facebook page
[01:40:49.920 --> 01:40:55.040]  and if you could try to point me so that I could read it for myself it takes me a little while to
[01:40:55.680 --> 01:41:00.000]  I've only been studying this for the past year or so huh to read what
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:06.160]  read what you just told me so I want to know it's all on my blog you go on my blog and type in
[01:41:06.160 --> 01:41:16.000]  the word ordinances you're going to get like 20 articles okay 20 articles all right I said like
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:20.240]  20 I don't really know how many there are up there but there's definitely more than one there's several
[01:41:21.440 --> 01:41:27.360]  and they go into great detail in arguing about why this is not possible okay well one of the things
[01:41:27.360 --> 01:41:35.200]  that you were talking about earlier was how the attorneys are using um when there was not a trial
[01:41:35.840 --> 01:41:43.440]  okay a criminal trial for my cars when I because I had requested one and uh
[01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:52.400]  pled not guilty to that and then she talked me into the administrative hearing I can't can I make
[01:41:52.400 --> 01:42:00.800]  the argument in a suit against the attorney that they took me to court and they applied the law
[01:42:00.800 --> 01:42:08.000]  negligently toward me for the parking and all you can make the argument but the problem is is
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  you're going to have to go through the city to get it you're going to have to sue the city and the
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:16.640]  city attorney because they're the ones that did it and they did it at the behest of the city which
[01:42:16.640 --> 01:42:26.080]  makes the city respond to superior you can't just go after the attorney right okay see that's the part
[01:42:26.080 --> 01:42:32.240]  that is thrown me because uh that's one of the things that they threw my countersuit out was
[01:42:32.240 --> 01:42:42.560]  because I had sued the employees and the uh city both at the same time so because I sued the city
[01:42:42.560 --> 01:42:49.440]  that immediately it throws the employees out because even if I sued the employees it does
[01:42:49.440 --> 01:42:57.760]  through the city so this stuff gets you start going round and round and get mixed up real easy on
[01:42:57.760 --> 01:43:03.520]  this stuff so it's like I'm looking for something that's not the problem here is is you once again
[01:43:03.520 --> 01:43:09.200]  have the Texas courts ignoring what's specifically written in the Texas law Texas law specifically
[01:43:09.200 --> 01:43:16.640]  says that municipalities can sue and be sued be plea and impleted they can plea and be impleted
[01:43:16.640 --> 01:43:21.840]  they can be sued yet the courts continue to protect them like they're they can't be sued
[01:43:21.840 --> 01:43:29.280]  and state law specifically says they can right so once again this is the court's legislating
[01:43:29.280 --> 01:43:40.880]  from the bench to protect its own right so what would you recommend a federal lawsuit against
[01:43:40.880 --> 01:43:49.040]  the city and against the courts in that city well I don't think I've ever been before the court
[01:43:50.560 --> 01:43:55.440]  kind of missing the point an illegal court or an illegal court actions illegal no matter what
[01:43:55.440 --> 01:44:01.600]  whether you've been before or not if they're going against you in a decision through advances in
[01:44:01.600 --> 01:44:07.760]  technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition people feed their pets
[01:44:07.760 --> 01:44:13.600]  better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging
[01:44:13.600 --> 01:44:19.360]  in disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have
[01:44:19.360 --> 01:44:26.160]  been irradiated adulterated and mutilated young jeffrey can provide the nutrients you need logo
[01:44:26.160 --> 01:44:32.080]  radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products most of which we reject we have
[01:44:32.080 --> 01:44:38.320]  come to trust young jeffrey so much we became a marketing distributor along with alex jones
[01:44:38.320 --> 01:44:44.160]  ben fuchs and many others when you order from logo's radio network dot com your health will
[01:44:44.160 --> 01:44:50.960]  improve as you help support quality radio as you realize the benefits of young jeffrey you may want
[01:44:50.960 --> 01:44:57.120]  to join us as a distributor you can experience improved health help your friends and family
[01:44:57.120 --> 01:45:05.040]  and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case
[01:45:05.040 --> 01:45:11.200]  without an attorney with jurors dictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course
[01:45:11.200 --> 01:45:18.400]  that will show you how in 24 hours death by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should
[01:45:18.400 --> 01:45:24.240]  be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won
[01:45:24.240 --> 01:45:31.200]  with our step by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.200 --> 01:45:37.440]  with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what
[01:45:37.440 --> 01:45:43.600]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts
[01:45:43.600 --> 01:45:49.840]  you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases
[01:45:49.840 --> 01:45:56.640]  pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.640 --> 01:46:08.080]  or call toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:26.640 --> 01:46:41.680]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio all right we're in our last segment
[01:46:41.680 --> 01:46:51.120]  now tim let's see if we can wrap this up okay so if the local court including state district court
[01:46:51.120 --> 01:46:58.640]  protect their own i thought part of this occurred in the municipal court well that's the thing we
[01:46:58.640 --> 01:47:04.880]  went to a hearing and she took us to a back room suggested the administrative hearing but she
[01:47:04.880 --> 01:47:11.680]  portrayed it as being something completely different than what it was and who is she the
[01:47:11.680 --> 01:47:18.960]  prosecutor he took us to a back room my wife just so happened to record the entire conversation
[01:47:18.960 --> 01:47:26.240]  who presided over this hearing oh the municipal judge thank you yes sir
[01:47:28.720 --> 01:47:33.440]  so you have a municipal judge acting in an administrative setting where they have absolutely
[01:47:33.440 --> 01:47:41.600]  no jurisdiction or authority of any kind that's fraud that's impersonation of a judicial officer
[01:47:41.600 --> 01:47:48.560]  that's lack of jurisdiction those are all actionable you can sue for malicious prosecution
[01:47:48.560 --> 01:47:53.680]  in that case well hang on a second i'll make sure i'm not portraying something that's not true
[01:47:54.240 --> 01:47:59.600]  when i when you asked about the hearing this is just the preliminary hearing this is not the
[01:47:59.600 --> 01:48:07.360]  administrative hearing i asked you who presided over the administrative hearing okay the administrative
[01:48:07.360 --> 01:48:12.240]  hearing there was there's nobody presiding over except the city secretary that they put with the
[01:48:12.240 --> 01:48:18.400]  gavel in her hand and then they can't preside over anything she can't conduct a hearing of any kind
[01:48:18.400 --> 01:48:24.800]  well that's what happened and then the attorney the prosecutor attorney that sold this to me
[01:48:25.360 --> 01:48:32.720]  it was sitting there uh running the show standing up telling me what i could say and what i couldn't
[01:48:32.720 --> 01:48:43.120]  say randy was there and uh that's where it all went south but you know like i said it was that's
[01:48:43.120 --> 01:48:50.240]  how they that's how they did it so so you have multiple city employees engaging in fraudulent
[01:48:50.240 --> 01:48:55.760]  activities against members of the public and they're doing it openly yeah code enforcement officers
[01:48:55.760 --> 01:49:02.080]  are there city administrator was there uh okay then you can sue each and every one of these in
[01:49:02.080 --> 01:49:10.240]  their individuals in their private and official capacities okay well uh i have someone that's
[01:49:10.240 --> 01:49:16.640]  mentioning a riko suit instead of would it be easier to do it with a riko suit because
[01:49:17.280 --> 01:49:21.680]  they would at least listen to what i had to say as long as it was formulated correctly well you
[01:49:21.680 --> 01:49:27.200]  have a rights violation for due process at the federal level anyway riko or not okay
[01:49:29.840 --> 01:49:36.960]  all right i'm going to email you is that okay yeah it's okay i can't guarantee when i'll see it
[01:49:36.960 --> 01:49:47.760]  but it's okay okay and um try to have everything organized properly i'm supposed to go this week
[01:49:48.320 --> 01:49:54.800]  and look at the ordinances and see which ordinances were adopted when what do you mean go this week
[01:49:55.840 --> 01:50:01.360]  are you trying to do this historical research yeah she's pulling up all of the ordinances
[01:50:01.360 --> 01:50:09.600]  when they were uh you know changed at the bottom it says adopted and so i want to see
[01:50:10.560 --> 01:50:16.080]  when they were adopted i want to see if i was in business before they even adopted the ordinances
[01:50:16.960 --> 01:50:22.800]  okay that they used against me in a court of law uh doesn't sound to me like they used it against
[01:50:22.800 --> 01:50:26.400]  you in a court of law sounds to me like they use it in front of the city secretary in a rigged
[01:50:26.400 --> 01:50:35.360]  uh kangaroo trial well yeah it's the the whole thing is is whether you know eddie i'm not you've
[01:50:35.360 --> 01:50:41.600]  been studying this stuff for a long time me i'm like the rest of the sheep we've just been letting
[01:50:41.600 --> 01:50:48.720]  it go by and you know who needs the trouble but now it purged itself up on my porch and i gotta do
[01:50:48.720 --> 01:50:53.120]  something about it yeah now it's taking a crap all over your breakfast chair in the mornings and
[01:50:53.120 --> 01:50:59.360]  i want to hear about it well i want to do whatever it is that gets their attention
[01:51:00.320 --> 01:51:06.000]  because uh and that's another thing is when they finally dismiss their case against me
[01:51:08.080 --> 01:51:16.560]  that was january of this year january the 23rd so for a malicious prosecution i only have one
[01:51:16.560 --> 01:51:24.720]  year yep a statute of limitations so my time is running out yep so i need to discuss this
[01:51:24.720 --> 01:51:33.280]  with you uh and whenever i can just me and you and you tell me what to do and all that stuff and
[01:51:34.800 --> 01:51:40.560]  if that would be i that's what i want to do but i want to do the right thing i don't want to go in
[01:51:40.560 --> 01:51:48.880]  there have caught being stupid well the thing about it is the thing that can help you more than i
[01:51:48.880 --> 01:51:54.000]  can as far as how to do the lawsuit is jurisdiction that's number one i want to tell you how to file
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:59.760]  the lawsuit and go after it now the only downside the jurisdiction is it does not tell you at all
[01:51:59.760 --> 01:52:05.840]  how to sue anybody in government that's the downside of it but at least it gives you a basic
[01:52:05.840 --> 01:52:11.760]  understanding of how the the anatomy of a lawsuit is handled and dealt with and time constraints and
[01:52:11.760 --> 01:52:16.560]  what you need to do to make sure you meet them and all that good stuff yeah i'm doing it every
[01:52:16.560 --> 01:52:21.520]  night okay the rest of the time you can talk to court clerks you can talk to these people and
[01:52:21.520 --> 01:52:26.800]  though they can't give you legal advice they can't say well if if you've done this and this is the
[01:52:26.800 --> 01:52:31.040]  next step you have to do these are the things you have to do in these next steps okay they can't
[01:52:31.040 --> 01:52:36.160]  tell you how to do them or what to do them with but they can tell you what the steps are right
[01:52:36.160 --> 01:52:42.160]  if the restraining order was based specifically on something that like you said the kangaroo court
[01:52:42.160 --> 01:52:50.960]  of the administrative hearing that's that's uh that's uh uh the attorneys can't say oh we made
[01:52:50.960 --> 01:52:58.080]  a mistake and get off of it right oh they could say it all day long but there's no way an attorney
[01:52:58.080 --> 01:53:03.760]  can legitimately claim that a city secretary had the authority to preside over an administrative
[01:53:03.760 --> 01:53:12.800]  hearing eddie they they voted the people in on this thing the night before the hearing
[01:53:14.080 --> 01:53:20.960]  what do you mean voted on me in they had to have a council meeting and a point who was
[01:53:20.960 --> 01:53:25.520]  going to be on the administrative board this okay so you're saying that the city council
[01:53:25.520 --> 01:53:32.160]  conspired to violate state constitution and law to create a court of jurisdiction that the state
[01:53:32.160 --> 01:53:42.880]  itself doesn't allow them to have well in the state well there is an alternative adjudication
[01:53:42.880 --> 01:53:49.280]  process they call an administrative hearing no there isn't well the municipal courts do not
[01:53:49.280 --> 01:53:58.480]  have civil jurisdiction outside of that granted by state law period okay well that's not what i read so
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:05.040]  i'm not trying to argue with you i'm just telling you i read it from the statute itself
[01:54:05.040 --> 01:54:08.720]  that i need to see the statute because i'm willing to bet bucks you you read it wrong
[01:54:09.360 --> 01:54:16.400]  okay i'm going to send it to you all right okay and we'll we'll end it at that now are we talking
[01:54:16.400 --> 01:54:22.160]  about a statute are we talking about an ordinance talking about a statute from the state okay that
[01:54:22.160 --> 01:54:30.240]  gives the municipal uh municipality authority for an administrative hearing but the administrative
[01:54:30.240 --> 01:54:43.040]  hearing has to be adopted into their ordinance okay send it i'll read it okay i will do so i
[01:54:43.040 --> 01:54:50.960]  appreciate you yes sir all right bye bye yes sir thanks for calling all right now i got four
[01:54:50.960 --> 01:54:57.440]  minutes here so let's see what else i can get we have a proof writer what do you got
[01:54:59.440 --> 01:55:01.280]  okay sir two questions
[01:55:03.760 --> 01:55:07.440]  please explain quickly since we're almost out of time so i might have a little bit more time to
[01:55:07.440 --> 01:55:16.400]  almost out of time when an officer brings the dmv printout of my record in court and i object to
[01:55:16.400 --> 01:55:22.240]  this information because it's hearsay and it's from a computer and it doesn't have any bearing
[01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:30.080]  what do i say with that what is the proper way to address that objection what is exactly just
[01:55:30.080 --> 01:55:34.960]  supposed to say to the judge the officer has no personal knowledge of the contents of those records
[01:55:34.960 --> 01:55:40.720]  he didn't enter the data and he didn't personally retrieve the data and even if he did he has no
[01:55:40.720 --> 01:55:44.960]  he cannot account for the rest of the data when it was entered into the system that's exactly
[01:55:44.960 --> 01:55:50.400]  why it's hearsay he cannot testify to the data on that sheet because he didn't personally enter
[01:55:50.400 --> 01:56:00.080]  it into the computer very good sir yes sir the other question you were discussing several months
[01:56:00.080 --> 01:56:06.160]  back about all the information and research that you did over the years and you decided to take
[01:56:06.160 --> 01:56:11.280]  it from i guess one or two or four three maybe maybe you got two or three opinions two an attorney
[01:56:11.280 --> 01:56:17.920]  or a lawyer to review them to see if you're making any mistakes is everything accurate what kind of
[01:56:17.920 --> 01:56:27.600]  lawyer or attorney did you take them before all kinds so every kind of any anyone particular
[01:56:27.600 --> 01:56:34.960]  that you took it to more than any other no any attorney i could find who would willingly look
[01:56:34.960 --> 01:56:42.320]  at the information we even right after i started this show randy met a young attorney who wanted
[01:56:42.320 --> 01:56:49.040]  to argue over the points of this randy invited him on to the show to debate with me the texas
[01:56:49.040 --> 01:56:58.000]  transportation code and he agreed to do so and i said i'll i'll even send you my book on the
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:04.160]  subject so you can see exactly what we're going to be talking about and exactly what the argument
[01:57:04.160 --> 01:57:10.400]  is based on and exactly what you're going to have to rebut and he canceled the appearance
[01:57:10.400 --> 01:57:24.320]  so that book incidentally was that the law versus the lie yes all right well thank you
[01:57:24.320 --> 01:57:27.760]  that that's all i need to know i want to find out what i might think about doing that get some
[01:57:27.760 --> 01:57:32.880]  information and take it in before any particular type of attorney to see if they can reach you
[01:57:32.880 --> 01:57:38.400]  well it depends since they're since and you're here they're handled criminally the first one
[01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:43.680]  i tried to talk to was a criminal attorney but i found people that were public defenders
[01:57:44.640 --> 01:57:49.200]  and they dealt with criminal cases from a defense side instead of a prosecution side
[01:57:49.200 --> 01:57:56.000]  and they were willing to read it i've let civil attorneys read it i've i've let all kinds of
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:01.600]  attorneys read it and i and they some of them want to argue but they don't get very far because
[01:58:01.600 --> 01:58:06.880]  they always run up against something they hadn't brought to the argument because they didn't
[01:58:06.880 --> 01:58:14.000]  bother to read that far or understand it well enough awesome well there's the music all right
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:18.720]  good night and god bless and thank you much yes sir thanks for calling in all right folks rest of
[01:58:18.720 --> 01:58:23.280]  you up on the color board i'm sorry i missed out on getting your call i just ran out of time tonight
[01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:28.480]  i had so much to talk about and so much to get done but anyway i hope y'all have a great week
[01:58:28.480 --> 01:58:35.120]  good night and god bless and please go to logosradio network.com check out the fundraiser and
[01:58:35.120 --> 01:58:40.640]  please donate whenever and wherever you can to the network and go to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:58:40.640 --> 01:58:47.120]  the donations page and there you can donate to us as individual co-host thank you so much have a great week
[01:58:50.400 --> 01:58:56.800]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study bible called the new testament
[01:58:56.800 --> 01:59:02.480]  recovery version the new testament recovery version has over 9 000 footnotes that explain what
[01:59:02.480 --> 01:59:08.640]  the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god and to know the meaning of life order
[01:59:08.640 --> 01:59:18.240]  your free copy today from bibles for america call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at
[01:59:18.240 --> 01:59:26.160]  bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13 000 cross references
[01:59:26.160 --> 01:59:31.920]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the bible this is truly a bible you can
[01:59:31.920 --> 01:59:41.120]  understand to get your free copy of the new testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:41.120 --> 01:59:55.280]  that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org looking for some truth you found it logosradio
[01:59:55.280 --> 02:00:05.280]  network.com