[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000] The Falling News Flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown [00:05.000 --> 00:08.000] Providing the Delhi Bulletsons for the Commodities Market [00:08.000 --> 00:10.000] Today's History [00:10.000 --> 00:12.000] News Updates [00:12.000 --> 00:16.000] And the Inside Scoop into the Tides of the Alternative [00:16.000 --> 00:19.000] Markets for Wednesday, the 26th of June, 2019 [00:19.000 --> 00:23.000] Open with Precious Metals, Gold in $1,407.70 an ounce [00:23.000 --> 00:25.000] Silver, $15.25 an ounce [00:25.000 --> 00:27.000] Copper, $2.73 an ounce [00:27.000 --> 00:29.000] Platinum, $808 an ounce [00:29.000 --> 00:32.000] Oil, Texas Crude, $57.83 a barrel [00:32.000 --> 00:34.000] Brent Crude, $65.05 a barrel [00:34.000 --> 00:37.000] And the Top 5 Cryptos in Order of Market Cap [00:37.000 --> 00:39.000] Bitcoin, $12,707 [00:39.000 --> 00:43.000] Coin, Ethereum, $332.57 a coin [00:43.000 --> 00:45.000] XRP, Ripple, $0.47 a coin [00:45.000 --> 00:48.000] Bitcoin Cash, $490.04 a coin [00:48.000 --> 00:52.000] And Lite Coins at $135.40 a crypto coin [00:52.000 --> 00:55.000] Today in History [00:55.000 --> 00:59.000] The year 1870, the Roman Catholic Holiday of Christmas [00:59.000 --> 01:02.000] has declared a federal holiday in the United States [01:02.000 --> 01:04.000] Today in History [01:07.000 --> 01:08.000] And recent news [01:08.000 --> 01:10.000] Representative Michael Burgess, Republican from the [01:10.000 --> 01:13.000] 26th Texas Congressional District, Centering in Denton County [01:13.000 --> 01:16.000] Defended the controversial conditions in which the facilities [01:16.000 --> 01:19.000] being used to house child immigrants are supposedly found in [01:19.000 --> 01:22.000] on MSNBC earlier this week. [01:22.000 --> 01:25.000] The lawmaker stated, quote, I've been to Casa Padre [01:25.000 --> 01:28.000] in Brownsville, Texas, and yes, it's a restored Walmart [01:28.000 --> 01:31.000] And you know what? There's not a lock on the door [01:31.000 --> 01:34.000] Any child is free to leave at any time, but they don't [01:34.000 --> 01:37.000] You know why? Because they are well taken care of [01:37.000 --> 01:40.000] And that they are, quote, free to leave at any time [01:40.000 --> 01:43.000] Apparently children must leave the facility with a parent or guardian [01:43.000 --> 01:47.000] who has passed a background check if they wish to stay in the United States [01:47.000 --> 01:49.000] But the child is free to leave by themselves [01:49.000 --> 01:52.000] if they return to where they came from [01:53.000 --> 01:56.000] General Motors Company is planning on investing $20 million [01:56.000 --> 01:59.000] at its Arlington Assembly plant in order to fit it to build [01:59.000 --> 02:02.000] the next generation of GM's full-size SUVs [02:02.000 --> 02:05.000] Gerald Johnson, GM Executive Vice President of Global Manufacturing [02:05.000 --> 02:08.000] stated that, quote, we've been building trucks in Texas [02:08.000 --> 02:11.000] for more than 20 years and our additional investment in Arlington Assembly [02:11.000 --> 02:14.000] is proof of our commitment and confidence in our Arlington team [02:14.000 --> 02:17.000] The automaker built the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban [02:17.000 --> 02:19.000] the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL [02:19.000 --> 02:23.000] and the catalog escalated at the 250-acre Arlington plant [02:27.000 --> 02:30.000] Findings in a report released by the insurance company Allstate [02:30.000 --> 02:32.000] looked into collision claims across the U.S. [02:32.000 --> 02:35.000] Two Texas cities made the list of safest cities to drive in [02:35.000 --> 02:39.000] with Laredo at number five and McAllen at number nine [02:39.000 --> 02:41.000] So let's keep driving safe, Texas [02:42.000 --> 02:44.000] The low-down is for a look at the sponsors [02:44.000 --> 02:47.000] You have a product or a service that can advertise with us [02:47.000 --> 02:50.000] Feel free to shoot me an e-mail at rickrodyatprotonmail.com [02:50.000 --> 02:54.000] That's rickrodyROHDE at protonmail.com [02:54.000 --> 03:23.000] This is the low-down for June 26, 2019 [03:23.000 --> 03:25.000] I think the people being victimized by criminal cops [03:25.000 --> 03:28.000] Psychopathic predators can't arrive the neighborhood black [03:28.000 --> 03:31.000] They're equipped with pepper spray, mate, cuffs, tazers, and glass [03:31.000 --> 03:33.000] They're like serial killers acting out for criminals [03:33.000 --> 03:36.000] The Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig [03:36.000 --> 03:39.000] It is July 8, 2019 [03:39.000 --> 03:41.000] We are live tonight [03:41.000 --> 03:44.000] I've got the caller board open if y'all want to start calling and getting in line [03:44.000 --> 03:48.000] 512-646-1984 [03:48.000 --> 03:51.000] I'd also like to take a moment to quickly remind you that [03:51.000 --> 03:54.000] We are still in need of your funding, folks [03:54.000 --> 03:57.000] We need donations, we need them bad [03:57.000 --> 04:01.000] Things are not any better for us than they are for anyone else [04:01.000 --> 04:04.000] And we depend upon y'all to survive here [04:04.000 --> 04:10.000] And surviving is becoming much, much harder every single day [04:10.000 --> 04:12.000] More so than you can believe [04:12.000 --> 04:18.000] So much so I'm looking for anything and everything else I can be doing to make a way better than this [04:18.000 --> 04:22.000] Because this is getting too difficult to maintain the way it is [04:22.000 --> 04:27.000] So if you are able, please keep us in your financial process [04:27.000 --> 04:33.000] And donate either to the network, to us personally, however you need to do it [04:33.000 --> 04:36.000] Or want to do it, but please keep us going [04:36.000 --> 04:40.000] Because we can't help you if we're not here [04:40.000 --> 04:46.000] Okay, I just want to talk real quick about something I'm working on for somebody right now [04:46.000 --> 04:52.000] And it is a case where they are attempting to charge him with driving while licensed and valid [04:52.000 --> 04:57.000] And they're attempting to raise it to a class B misdemeanor because [04:57.000 --> 05:02.000] They claim he had a prior conviction for a DUI [05:02.000 --> 05:05.000] Now we've got a certified copy of his criminal record [05:05.000 --> 05:08.000] We've got a certified copy of his driving record [05:08.000 --> 05:12.000] And there is no DUI conviction on it at all [05:12.000 --> 05:19.000] Now there is a prior suspension from many years ago for him refusing to blow [05:19.000 --> 05:26.000] Which is all part of the now defunct driver responsibility program [05:26.000 --> 05:31.000] Where they could actually administratively fine you and suspend your license automatically [05:31.000 --> 05:33.000] Which is what they were doing [05:33.000 --> 05:37.000] And the Supreme Court said many years ago that was absolutely unconstitutional [05:37.000 --> 05:40.000] They cannot just do that [05:40.000 --> 05:44.000] But they do not notify you of the administrative hearing [05:44.000 --> 05:48.000] They don't tell you anything about it until they've already done it [05:48.000 --> 05:51.000] And then you're screwed in trying to get it back [05:51.000 --> 05:58.000] But in any case, the prior suspension, his license was reinstated within a couple of three months [05:58.000 --> 06:05.000] And assumingly because either they found out they had made a mistake in suspending it in the first place [06:05.000 --> 06:08.000] Or he paid whatever fines was accumulated [06:08.000 --> 06:12.000] It doesn't really tell you how it was resolved, it just shows that it was [06:12.000 --> 06:20.000] Now, the prosecuting attorney in this case is going to be in deep doo-doo when I get done with him [06:20.000 --> 06:22.000] And here is why [06:22.000 --> 06:30.000] They use the information from his driving record to up the offense from a Class C to a Class B [06:30.000 --> 06:39.000] Thus they fail to thoroughly examine into the facts and get proper information and evidence from his criminal record [06:39.000 --> 06:42.000] Which is the only place that would show a conviction [06:42.000 --> 06:49.000] His driving record only shows driving offense convictions, not DUIs [06:49.000 --> 06:51.000] Okay? [06:51.000 --> 06:56.000] The criminal record is what would show the DUI and it shows there never was one [06:56.000 --> 06:59.000] He was never even charged with DUI [06:59.000 --> 07:03.000] He was never given anything in relation to a DUI [07:03.000 --> 07:06.000] Ever [07:06.000 --> 07:13.000] So the prosecuting attorney submitted a warrant or a request for a warrant to have him arrested on the Class B [07:13.000 --> 07:20.000] He's now under a bond which I've got to ride a habeas corpus to get taken off of him [07:20.000 --> 07:25.000] And get his money refunded because it was illegal to charge him with it to begin with [07:25.000 --> 07:35.000] Because the prosecuting attorney could have known and should have known by checking the criminal record that they could not put a penalty enhancement on this charge [07:35.000 --> 07:40.000] Because there was no prior conviction and they damn well knew it [07:40.000 --> 07:44.000] Or at least could have known and should have known it [07:44.000 --> 07:46.000] But they didn't [07:46.000 --> 07:51.000] So they perpetrated fraud upon the court to get the bond and to up the charge [07:51.000 --> 07:56.000] That means I also have to challenge the jurisdiction of the court over this offense [07:56.000 --> 08:04.000] How does that work? Everybody is claiming everybody that I'm in these legal group, discussion groups, I'm in and everything [08:04.000 --> 08:09.000] They're all going, challenge the jurisdiction doesn't work, I tried it, it doesn't work, they just ignore it [08:09.000 --> 08:13.000] Well, let me clue you in, you are doing it wrong [08:13.000 --> 08:14.000] Okay? [08:14.000 --> 08:23.000] First and foremost, in order to elevate a Class C to a Class B there has to be proof of the prior conviction for the enhancement to kick in [08:23.000 --> 08:30.000] Since there is no proof of a prior conviction the Class B cannot be in existence [08:30.000 --> 08:33.000] Leaving this thing at a Class C [08:33.000 --> 08:37.000] Who has original jurisdiction over Class C offenses? [08:37.000 --> 08:40.000] It is justice and municipal courts [08:40.000 --> 08:49.000] It is not county courts at law which is where they have him scheduled to appear and be arraigned and go to trial on the elevated offense [08:49.000 --> 08:52.000] That can't possibly exist [08:52.000 --> 08:56.000] Therefore the challenge to jurisdiction here is straight up subject matter [08:56.000 --> 09:05.000] The subject matter jurisdiction of this court is not and cannot be invoked as a court of original jurisdiction for a Class C misdemeanor [09:05.000 --> 09:13.000] Plain and simple, says so right in the law, you do not have original jurisdiction over a Class C [09:13.000 --> 09:20.000] End of discussion, therefore you have no grounds to conduct an arraignment [09:20.000 --> 09:25.000] Because you don't have jurisdiction over the case [09:25.000 --> 09:36.000] You don't have any jurisdiction to conduct a trial or any other proceeding in this matter nor to hold an individual on a bond for a Class B misdemeanor [09:36.000 --> 09:42.000] Hence you have to release them from that [09:42.000 --> 09:47.000] There is a correct way to do things folks and a correct way that will work [09:47.000 --> 09:54.000] If you just understand how it works and how to put it into action [09:54.000 --> 10:04.000] Okay, not only are we going after the lack of subject matter jurisdiction because this can't be elevated from a Class C fine only to a Class B [10:04.000 --> 10:14.000] And going after the simple fact that there was no prior conviction and the prosecution lied to the court to get the bond into first place [10:14.000 --> 10:27.000] But it stems from an arrest warrant that was issued for a failure to appear in a case where we have documented and video or audio evidence of an appearance on the day in question [10:27.000 --> 10:37.000] And the entire reason the warrant was issued was because the individual refused to plea, not because they didn't show up, but because they wouldn't enter a plea [10:37.000 --> 10:51.000] Which means that the lower courts that do this kind of thing are illegally converting a refusal to plead, an untimely refusal, or an untimely pleading, I should say [10:51.000 --> 10:55.000] Because they're not required to enter a plea at these appearances, ever [10:55.000 --> 11:04.000] In fact, in Chapter 45 the only time the accused is required to enter a plea is at the time of trial if the jury's been impenetled [11:04.000 --> 11:15.000] And then and only then can the judge, by law, enter a plea if not guilty on their behalf and presume to go forward [11:15.000 --> 11:21.000] That is the only way the process is described as functioning in Chapter 45 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure [11:21.000 --> 11:27.000] And yet, every single time you make an initial appearance, what does the clerk or someone else ask you to do? [11:27.000 --> 11:28.000] Enter a plea [11:28.000 --> 11:31.000] None of these people have the authority to take a plea [11:31.000 --> 11:40.000] This is not a judicial proceeding, which is the only place where a plea can be entered on the record of a court [11:40.000 --> 11:45.000] The only other way to do it is to write guilty on the ticket and send it in with your money [11:45.000 --> 11:51.000] Which raises a whole other plethora of problems, but that's beside the point of what I'm discussing at the moment [11:51.000 --> 12:00.000] So what this judge's policy in this municipal court was that anyone that won't enter a plea charged them with failure to appear [12:00.000 --> 12:04.000] That's falsifying government documents [12:04.000 --> 12:08.000] That is malicious prosecution [12:08.000 --> 12:16.000] That is intentionally perpetrating fraud upon your own court when you do that [12:16.000 --> 12:22.000] Because refusal to enter a plea can never be equivocated with failure to appear [12:22.000 --> 12:28.000] They are not in any way, shape, or form the same thing [12:28.000 --> 12:36.000] And yet, this individual was arrested and jailed for two days [12:36.000 --> 12:48.000] On a warrant that after we actually got the paperwork back on it, had already been recalled by the judge who issued it [12:48.000 --> 12:52.000] So how could he be arrested on a warrant that was recalled? [12:52.000 --> 13:02.000] I'll tell you how, because the Texas law enforcement system that runs these warrants and the judicial system that manages these warrants [13:02.000 --> 13:07.000] If it goes outside of that county, it has to be specifically sent outside of that county [13:07.000 --> 13:15.000] Therefore, if it is recalled, it has to be specifically recalled outside of that county to every place where it was sent [13:15.000 --> 13:17.000] This warrant was not [13:17.000 --> 13:23.000] Plus the fact, or at least if it was, no one bothered to check [13:23.000 --> 13:38.000] But when he was arrested and the judge appeared before, or they appeared before the judge in the jail in a non-public forum for this proceeding [13:38.000 --> 13:48.000] What they did then was tell him that they were basing his arrest on a telex about a warrant [13:48.000 --> 13:53.000] It wasn't about the warrant, it wasn't from a copy of the warrant [13:53.000 --> 13:57.000] It was from a telex that said there was a warrant [13:57.000 --> 14:05.000] No one ever looked at the actual warrant before they left him in the jail cell [14:05.000 --> 14:12.000] Now, the thing is, is they left him in there because they were waiting on the place that issued the warrant to come pick him up [14:12.000 --> 14:16.000] Or for him to bond out [14:16.000 --> 14:21.000] But the place that issued the warrant had recalled it, therefore there was no one there to go pick him up [14:21.000 --> 14:25.000] They had no legal grounds to pick him up [14:25.000 --> 14:29.000] So he had to post a bond to get out of jail [14:29.000 --> 14:40.000] And the bond was set based upon the false information from the prosecuting attorney that this was now a Class B due to a prior conviction that never happened [14:40.000 --> 14:45.000] This is your Texas justice system at work, people [14:45.000 --> 14:57.000] It is working very hard to screw the pooch at every turn in every single thing they do, and you are the only one that suffers consequences for their screw-ups [14:57.000 --> 15:00.000] You get that? [15:00.000 --> 15:12.000] They screw up, you pay the price, they continue to screw up, you pay the price, you do nothing about it, they keep screwing up, you keep paying the price [15:12.000 --> 15:19.000] What does it take to wake folks up to understand that these people are morons? [15:19.000 --> 15:32.000] They shouldn't have any power and authority, they damn well shouldn't be able to arrest somebody on a whim, and they certainly shouldn't be able to keep them in jail without reading the actual damned warrant [15:32.000 --> 15:38.000] And having a copy of it to be presented to the individual, which by the way they didn't have [15:38.000 --> 15:46.000] When the copy of the warrant was demanded they refused to give it, even though as a matter of law they are required to show it when it's requested [15:46.000 --> 15:48.000] But they didn't have it [15:48.000 --> 15:58.000] Therefore they couldn't verify that it had been recalled one way or the other and they just kept him in jail instead [15:58.000 --> 16:13.000] And now we've got to fight it and we've got to go after the judge again because if they did what I told them the first time they filed a judicial conduct complaint against this judge for falsifying the record and issuing that warrant [16:13.000 --> 16:16.000] Which is probably why it got recalled [16:16.000 --> 16:19.000] But they didn't recall it from everywhere [16:19.000 --> 16:24.000] And that's how this gentleman got arrested [16:24.000 --> 16:31.000] And then they held him based upon a warrant that no one had actually seen [16:31.000 --> 16:35.000] And that no one could provide him with a copy of [16:35.000 --> 16:41.000] And no one bothered to look up to see whether or not it was valid [16:41.000 --> 16:48.000] And yet our courts, including our criminal supreme court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal says [16:48.000 --> 16:53.000] That's okay, the warrant's valid as long as y'all sir believes it is [16:53.000 --> 16:54.000] Bologna [16:54.000 --> 17:00.000] Alright folks, we'll take your calls when we get back. 512-646-1984 [17:00.000 --> 17:12.000] Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights [17:12.000 --> 17:19.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law [17:19.000 --> 17:34.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former sheriff's deputy A. Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law [17:34.000 --> 17:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today [17:40.000 --> 17:50.000] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material [17:50.000 --> 17:58.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com, order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve [17:58.000 --> 18:15.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers proven method. Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two [18:15.000 --> 18:21.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute [18:21.000 --> 18:34.000] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away [18:34.000 --> 18:41.000] The Michael Meyers proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well [18:41.000 --> 18:51.000] For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner or email Michael Meyers at yahoo.com [18:51.000 --> 19:01.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now [19:01.000 --> 19:11.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network at yahoo.com [19:31.000 --> 19:42.000] Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio, the calling number 512-646-1984 [19:42.000 --> 19:50.000] Alright, we've got a caller board up and ready here. First person up in line is Max in Texas. Max, what do you got? [19:50.000 --> 19:56.000] Hang on just a sec. For some reason I can't get this thing to click [19:56.000 --> 20:07.000] It's called there were security thing has popped up here yet again in my way. Hang on just a second. It's making me log in over 5 seconds [20:07.000 --> 20:11.000] Alright, now let me see if I can get you up here. Max, you there? [20:11.000 --> 20:13.000] Am I there? [20:13.000 --> 20:14.000] You are there. [20:14.000 --> 20:18.000] Alright, great. Hey, Shidochi, Mr. Eddie Craig. [20:18.000 --> 20:20.000] Yes sir, how you doing? [20:20.000 --> 20:28.000] Nah, I just made a ghost account on Facebook. I need you to befriend me. That'd be great. [20:28.000 --> 20:29.000] Okay. [20:29.000 --> 20:40.000] But anyway, yeah, I was looking at the y'all are running a new fundraiser and seems like it's going okay for how quick y'all just started it [20:40.000 --> 20:54.000] but I know y'all can always use more and you know, I'm trying to do a dedicated at least $25 a month to you guys, you know, just for an entry [20:54.000 --> 21:06.000] because I'd love to have me a spike tactical AR-15 but and I'm not sure if that does it. If I do a recurring payment of $25 every month, does that get me an entry every month? [21:06.000 --> 21:10.000] Yeah, every $25 donation gets you an entry, so yes. [21:10.000 --> 21:19.000] Oh, sweet. Okay, and cool. And of course, naturally, I donate to you, you know, a meaningful amount, you know, just enough to get you back. [21:19.000 --> 21:22.000] I know how hard you hustle, brother. [21:22.000 --> 21:25.000] I appreciate that. I really do. [21:25.000 --> 21:38.000] But anyway, yeah, I'm hoping to get back linked in on Facebook. I know you kind of admonished me for completely buggering out of Facebook, so I made myself... [21:38.000 --> 21:48.000] Well, not admonished. I mean, it's just like the only problem with the Miwi stuff is that there wasn't enough people on there to make going over there completely worthwhile at the time [21:48.000 --> 21:53.000] and now it looks like that may be finally changing so I can start going over there more regular. [21:53.000 --> 21:55.000] The thing is, is that... [21:55.000 --> 22:05.000] I was never a Miwi guy, man. I was a Mines guy. I kind of started your group on Mines, but anyway, yeah, I had a video that I'd made. [22:05.000 --> 22:18.000] I know it's kind of cheesy, but I wanted to share it with at least the not engaged in Transportation Texas Facebook group and maybe even your group, should you approve? [22:18.000 --> 22:25.000] Yeah, I'm not sure I understand everything about what you're trying to make a point of in it, but yes, it's fine. [22:25.000 --> 22:33.000] Yeah, I know. I know. I know. It's a little lazy, but I thought it was funny the way the dialogue lined up with the video. [22:33.000 --> 22:36.000] But anyway, that aside... [22:36.000 --> 22:53.000] Try to make one... If you really want to draw attention, I mean, I really like the one that someone just did with the cross interlacing of the previews and scenes from Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure and John Wick Parabellum, [22:53.000 --> 23:02.000] where he gets to meet himself as Ted and, you know, is progressing through. It's actually quite funny. [23:02.000 --> 23:11.000] Oh, man, you gotta share that with me, man. Once I get established back in Facebook, I have like zero friends, so... [23:11.000 --> 23:14.000] What name did you go back under? [23:14.000 --> 23:19.000] Well, put it this way. It's someone who sleeps with the fishes. [23:19.000 --> 23:21.000] Okay. [23:21.000 --> 23:38.000] So, you know, Godfather reference there. But anyway, yeah, yeah, but my latest thing now is, you know, I got my personal landcraft, you know, bristling with cameras, as everyone's should be. [23:38.000 --> 23:54.000] And what I've done is I've paid for the stupid registration and all that stuff, but I just didn't stick it on my windshield because, you know, I think you're the one who taught me the wrong subtitle. [23:54.000 --> 24:02.000] We're not allowed to make a warrantless arrest for things regarding registration of motor vehicles or what have you. [24:02.000 --> 24:14.000] Yeah, exactly. The 42 arrest is limited to chapters 541 through 600, and everything else is outside of that. [24:14.000 --> 24:24.000] Uh-huh, so I'm waiting to get them on my GoPro saying, the reason we pulled you over is because it's thicker. Oh, really? Can you say that a little louder on my cameras? [24:24.000 --> 24:38.000] But anyway, yeah, just, but other than that, I mean, it's been pretty slow pace. I'm not sure if these guys around here, ever since I sent out the PIRs, so all the various departments around here that they're kind of like, [24:38.000 --> 24:56.000] man, that guy's not worth the trouble. Let's just get his neighbors, you know, kind of thing or what, but I haven't been getting too much trouble from them. But like I was saying, I thought I'd jump back on the Facebook just because I think most of your action happens on the Facebook, not necessarily. [24:56.000 --> 24:58.000] At the moment it does, yes. [24:58.000 --> 25:08.000] Yes, I needed to jump back in there just so I can, you know, stay abreast with what's going on with Shidoshi Craig. [25:08.000 --> 25:32.000] But anyway, yeah, yeah, I mostly called to Toot your horn and tell other people that, hey, man, let's help out logos, radio networks, stay on air because, I mean, these guys are just, I mean, I can't, you know, it's hard for me to even explain how much of a benefit you guys have given me in a court setting [25:32.000 --> 25:57.000] and learning how to read and understand legalese and the statutory interpretation and all that kind of stuff. I mean, simply, you know, incalculable value. So, you know, other new listeners, you know, I know Eddie Craig, you know, when you talk to him, he, you know, sorry to talk about you in the third person, but he's a tough guy on you. [25:57.000 --> 26:09.000] And it's because when you get into these courts, man, these guys are going to give you no quarter, you know, and so if we don't learn how to spar full contact, if you can't handle it with Eddie Craig, and you're not going to be able to handle it in the courtroom. [26:09.000 --> 26:28.000] So, you know, you need to toughen yourself up and be on your game. Don't just study this stuff like it's a script. Understand the concepts that are behind it so that you can think on your feet and learn to object in a timely fashion and preserve those objections and preserve those objections for, you know, for appeal. [26:28.000 --> 26:40.000] So, because we all know that's the point, you know, of the trial court is to set yourself up for appeal. So. [26:40.000 --> 26:47.000] Yeah, I've been called a lot of things from downright mean and abusive to just plain old a-hole, you know, that's just the way it is. [26:47.000 --> 27:05.000] Eddie, I remember when I first called you, I was like, I was like, man, this guy beat me up. This is a nice guy. And I just continue to listen and persevere through it. And now, man, like, man, I can't tell you how many people a week asked me, you know, hey, man, can you jump in the ring and fight Mike Tyson for me? [27:05.000 --> 27:15.000] And I'm like, no, I really can't. You're going to have to learn how to do self-defense yourself, you know. You know, I can give you great advice, you know, that's not legal advice, of course. [27:15.000 --> 27:23.000] I can be in your corner and I can tell you what kind of punch and how to punch. But if you ain't listening and able to box, what difference does it make? [27:23.000 --> 27:35.000] Right. I can't do it for you. So, but anyway, I can't thank you enough. You and Deb and really Randy as well. Randy's been extremely helpful. [27:35.000 --> 27:46.000] He's a little, as he says, he's not trying to be always pedantic, you know, and he's a little hard to listen to. But, man, listen to you. [27:46.000 --> 27:59.000] I mean, Eddie, you're to the point, you know, you don't pull any punches and if people think that that's a bad thing and a turnoff, I'm telling you guys, you're wrong. [27:59.000 --> 28:12.000] When you get into these settings where you've got these people who are these road pirates who are trying to take your money, trying to take your money, you know, unlawfully, this is what we got to do. [28:12.000 --> 28:23.000] We all got to stand up and, you know, and I see a lot of these, you know, oh, what is it, live PD and all this stuff and all these YouTube videos of people completely screwing it up, screwing up. [28:23.000 --> 28:40.000] They don't follow the script or anything like that. But just the very fact that they know about not engaged in transportation and not, you know, like they know these basic words means that we were at a lot better position of having a well-informed jury out there [28:40.000 --> 28:53.000] and a people who understand that the transportation is something completely different from us being all de facto on house arrest here in Texas. So I, you know, I can't thank you enough, brother. [28:53.000 --> 28:59.000] And mostly I call the Toot Your Horn, you know, and tell you, hey, befriend me on Facebook. I know it's a weird account. [28:59.000 --> 29:03.000] Well, I found it, and I'm irreplaceable unknown. [29:03.000 --> 29:05.000] I found it, and I did. [29:05.000 --> 29:18.000] Good man. Okay. Well, that's it. Look, look, I think y'all are sitting like, let me see, $550 something right now on the money bomb that's going on. [29:18.000 --> 29:30.000] Hey, guys, everybody listening. Let's throw some more. Let's throw some more at these guys because, man, since 2009, these guys have been teaching people how to fight and how to get dismissals. [29:30.000 --> 29:38.000] And it ain't no joke. I mean, we have the dismissals to prove it. So yeah, it works. If you learn it and you apply it, it works. [29:38.000 --> 29:42.000] That's right. It may take you a little while to get there, but it will work. [29:42.000 --> 29:56.000] Yeah. And, you know, sometimes it takes a little bit of a beating. You know, you think you know what's right. And, you know, sometimes any guy's got to, you know, sweep the leg and, you know, and teach you, hey, that didn't work. [29:56.000 --> 30:00.000] All right, man. Hang on. Just a sec. I got a break to take him. We'll be right back. [30:02.000 --> 30:09.000] Please scan your next item. That annoying mechanical voice from the self-check-out lane may soon be silenced for good. [30:09.000 --> 30:15.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have great news on the death of computerized cashiers next. [30:15.000 --> 30:25.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.000 --> 30:33.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.000 --> 30:43.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Ben. Start over with StartPage. [30:43.000 --> 30:57.000] Apparently, I'm not the only one who hates the self-served check stands at stores. After a decade of trying them, retailers are finally acknowledging studies that say shoppers would rather dodge the self-serve lane and head for a human cashier. [30:57.000 --> 31:09.000] Today, just 16% of grocery store transactions go through self-checkout lanes. That's down from a high of 22% three years ago. Shoppers say they're more satisfied when they pay people, not cold computers. [31:09.000 --> 31:18.000] In response, grocery chains like Big Y and Albertsons plan to bag the do-it-yourself option and bring back customer service, hooray. [31:18.000 --> 31:23.000] Now, if only they dump the purchase tracking cards, I mean membership cards. [31:23.000 --> 31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:31.000 --> 31:37.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [31:37.000 --> 31:44.000] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [31:44.000 --> 31:47.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [31:47.000 --> 31:50.000] And thousands of my fellow fortune-spunders are dying. [31:50.000 --> 31:51.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [31:51.000 --> 31:52.000] I'm a structural engineer. [31:52.000 --> 31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [31:53.000 --> 31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [31:54.000 --> 31:56.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [31:56.000 --> 31:59.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [31:59.000 --> 32:02.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [32:02.000 --> 32:07.000] It's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [32:07.000 --> 32:10.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails. [32:10.000 --> 32:12.000] But good luck getting them to pay for it. [32:12.000 --> 32:14.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails. [32:14.000 --> 32:15.000] But I'm serious about your roof. [32:15.000 --> 32:22.000] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [32:22.000 --> 32:27.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [32:27.000 --> 32:32.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [32:32.000 --> 32:39.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [32:39.000 --> 32:46.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [32:46.000 --> 32:51.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. [32:51.000 --> 32:57.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [32:57.000 --> 33:00.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [33:00.000 --> 33:29.000] I might actually be kidding about chemtrails. [33:30.000 --> 33:35.000] All right, folks, we are back. [33:35.000 --> 33:43.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984, and we are finishing up with Max in Texas. [33:43.000 --> 33:45.000] All right, Max. [33:45.000 --> 33:46.000] Yeah, okay. [33:46.000 --> 33:56.000] So everybody who's thinking about or even contemplating donated money to the Logos Radio Network fundraiser. [33:56.000 --> 34:09.000] Right now it's at 505-66, and before the end of my phone call, I'm going to throw in another $100, plus my usual monthly donations. [34:09.000 --> 34:19.000] And I'm telling you guys, if any of y'all derive a benefit out of this, you got to help these guys out, because they do it bare bones. [34:19.000 --> 34:31.000] You know, I mean, they don't get paid for this, you know, and so, you know, it behooves us to keep them on the air and pumping out this, you know, the truth. [34:31.000 --> 34:43.000] The truth about how Texas Law and Transportation Code and how this crap works versus how it's being used to plunder and steal our money. [34:43.000 --> 34:54.000] And if we're going to do anything about this, guys, you know, short of the cartridge box, you know, this is what we got to do, is we got to fully inform juries, and we got to fully inform people. [34:54.000 --> 35:02.000] And so I plan on donating more, and I hope I can convince everybody else to. [35:02.000 --> 35:05.000] I got a Mines Group for Dallas Law. [35:05.000 --> 35:12.000] I don't know if anybody's on mines.com, but we got a Dallas Law Mines Group. [35:12.000 --> 35:15.000] You know, we've got a Dallas Law Facebook group, of course. [35:15.000 --> 35:17.000] We got the legal blog. [35:17.000 --> 35:22.000] Man, I mean, we got to get the word out, and we got to fix this problem. [35:22.000 --> 35:29.000] Well, have you been at least taking the stuff that I've posted on the blog or linking it into the mine stuff at least? [35:29.000 --> 35:30.000] Absolutely. [35:30.000 --> 35:32.000] Every time, Eddie, you know that. [35:32.000 --> 35:33.000] Okay. [35:33.000 --> 35:37.000] Yeah, every single one of your posts get posted over there on Mines. [35:37.000 --> 35:42.000] And the video that I made recently, you know, it ends with a Mines plug. [35:42.000 --> 35:46.000] Only because I like open source stuff. Mines is open source. [35:46.000 --> 36:03.000] You know, we're all wrestling with what, you know, I made a fake, you know, a shell Facebook account because apparently, I'm not welcome in their community standards. [36:03.000 --> 36:14.000] Me, you know, me listening to you and just understanding the law and the black letter, the way it reads, family against their community standards. [36:14.000 --> 36:15.000] And that really offended me. [36:15.000 --> 36:17.000] And I left and you're right. [36:17.000 --> 36:19.000] I shouldn't have just buggered out. [36:19.000 --> 36:22.000] I should have just, you know, kind of kept my head down. [36:22.000 --> 36:26.000] But anyway, I'd like to share that video out there. [36:26.000 --> 36:32.000] You know, it's rather simplistic and, you know, I wish I could have spent more time on it. [36:32.000 --> 36:43.000] Like, like, like pasting your face on Shidoshi's, you know, over Shidoshi's face, but the video editing actually takes a lot of work to do that. [36:43.000 --> 36:47.000] So, but anyway, I encourage everyone to donate, man. [36:47.000 --> 36:59.000] And if anybody has any doubt in their mind that you can secure a dismissal using the information that Eddie Craig and even Randy Kelton puts out there. [36:59.000 --> 37:08.000] I mean, I'm telling you guys, trust me, they wouldn't, they would much rather take the 300 people behind you. [37:08.000 --> 37:17.000] They would much rather take their money than engage in a fight with anybody who has any kind of knowledge about this, you know, this subject matter. [37:17.000 --> 37:23.000] So, so, you know, again, I want to encourage everybody to, hey, hey. [37:23.000 --> 37:29.000] The more difficult you make yourself as a mark, the less likely they are to want to keep you around. [37:29.000 --> 37:30.000] That's right. [37:30.000 --> 37:33.000] And as far as the funding goes, folks, think of it this way. [37:33.000 --> 37:45.000] You can keep paying the tickets and losing that money forever, or you can donate that money to us and learn the knowledge that will keep you from having to pay those tickets forever. [37:45.000 --> 37:46.000] That's right. [37:46.000 --> 37:49.000] And actually, I mean, it's not just Texas, man. [37:49.000 --> 38:04.000] You've got, you've got all, you know, California, you've got all these different states that you've spent the time, the time and the effort to understand their laws and their legislative acts and all this kind of stuff. [38:04.000 --> 38:17.000] And so, man, I mean, you know, there's nobody who's done more homework than Eddie Craig when it comes to transportation versus just the people's liberty of locomotion. [38:17.000 --> 38:20.000] You know, to, you know, to not be under house arrest. [38:20.000 --> 38:24.000] So, you know, you're not wasting your money, guys. [38:24.000 --> 38:27.000] And then not only that, but you got a chance to win an AR-15. [38:27.000 --> 38:30.000] I mean, who could beat that? [38:30.000 --> 38:32.000] Exactly. [38:32.000 --> 38:33.000] Anyway, okay. [38:33.000 --> 38:35.000] All right, Max, I appreciate it. [38:35.000 --> 38:36.000] Thank you. [38:36.000 --> 38:38.000] Yeah, I don't have much more of a question. [38:38.000 --> 38:48.000] It was much more of just trying to encourage everybody to get on board with the movement and I'll let you move on to the next caller, man. [38:48.000 --> 38:49.000] All right. [38:49.000 --> 38:50.000] Thanks for calling. [38:50.000 --> 38:51.000] Love what you do. [38:51.000 --> 38:52.000] God bless, brother. [38:52.000 --> 38:53.000] Appreciate it. [38:53.000 --> 38:54.000] You too. [38:54.000 --> 38:55.000] Bye. [38:55.000 --> 38:56.000] Bye-bye. [38:56.000 --> 38:57.000] All right. [38:57.000 --> 39:01.000] Now we have Khalia Mary. [39:01.000 --> 39:04.000] Hello? [39:04.000 --> 39:07.000] Area Code 443. [39:07.000 --> 39:08.000] Hey, Eddie Craig. [39:08.000 --> 39:09.000] Yes? [39:09.000 --> 39:11.000] Hey, what's going on? [39:11.000 --> 39:12.000] Nothing much. [39:12.000 --> 39:13.000] I have a question. [39:13.000 --> 39:14.000] Okay. [39:14.000 --> 39:16.000] So, I was pulled over. [39:16.000 --> 39:17.000] No tags. [39:17.000 --> 39:20.000] I have tags that are probably not for hire. [39:20.000 --> 39:21.000] It's pulled over. [39:21.000 --> 39:22.000] What state are you in? [39:22.000 --> 39:24.000] Denver. [39:24.000 --> 39:25.000] Maryland. [39:25.000 --> 39:26.000] Baltimore, Maryland. [39:26.000 --> 39:27.000] Okay. [39:27.000 --> 39:28.000] Okay. [39:28.000 --> 39:30.000] So, I was pulled over. [39:30.000 --> 39:32.000] No tags on my car. [39:32.000 --> 39:35.000] The tagger in my car said probably not for hire. [39:35.000 --> 39:37.000] I was pulled over. [39:37.000 --> 39:39.000] I bought them with County Police. [39:39.000 --> 39:41.000] I was going off the script. [39:41.000 --> 39:44.000] I didn't provide them any information. [39:44.000 --> 39:47.000] I started to notice that I wasn't engaging transportation. [39:47.000 --> 39:52.000] When you say you didn't provide them information, how did you do that? [39:52.000 --> 39:53.000] I asked them. [39:53.000 --> 39:55.000] They asked me for my license to registration. [39:55.000 --> 39:58.000] And I said, could that information be used against me in the court of law? [39:58.000 --> 39:59.000] Very good. [39:59.000 --> 40:01.000] That's exactly what you should do. [40:01.000 --> 40:04.000] And they said that it could be used to write your ticket. [40:04.000 --> 40:07.000] And I said, do I have a right to non-criminate myself? [40:07.000 --> 40:08.000] And they said, yeah. [40:08.000 --> 40:13.000] So, he called the supervisor and I gave him, another paper that I gave him that said the [40:13.000 --> 40:14.000] same thing for real. [40:14.000 --> 40:20.000] He called the supervisor and he was saying, oh, I know all about this service citizen [40:20.000 --> 40:25.000] thing, but you had to provide us with your license to registration. [40:25.000 --> 40:28.000] And I told him I wasn't waiting for my first amendment. [40:28.000 --> 40:31.000] They were about to break my window. [40:31.000 --> 40:34.000] And I told them that, you know, I dealt the car under the rest. [40:34.000 --> 40:35.000] I dealt the car. [40:35.000 --> 40:37.000] I don't consent to anything. [40:37.000 --> 40:40.000] I'm not waiving my first amendment like this open criminal nation. [40:40.000 --> 40:46.000] So, they locked me up in the investigation and told my car. [40:46.000 --> 40:52.000] So, I called you before and I remember you was telling me how to point it out in the [40:52.000 --> 40:53.000] law. [40:53.000 --> 41:00.000] So, what I did was a distant researcher and first thing I found was Article 3, Section [41:00.000 --> 41:06.000] 29 of Maryland Constitution that states all laws must embrace one subject. [41:06.000 --> 41:11.000] I also have a report on Senate Bill 40. [41:11.000 --> 41:15.000] Senate Bill 40 in Maryland is the vehicle law. [41:15.000 --> 41:18.000] It was recodified in 1977. [41:18.000 --> 41:22.000] It was recodified under the subject matter transportation. [41:22.000 --> 41:23.000] Right. [41:23.000 --> 41:28.000] And also had the legal definition of transportation as well. [41:28.000 --> 41:29.000] Right. [41:29.000 --> 41:31.000] And I wanted to see, do you think that... [41:31.000 --> 41:32.000] Where did you get it? [41:32.000 --> 41:33.000] Possibly any more evidence. [41:33.000 --> 41:34.000] I could add some more. [41:34.000 --> 41:38.000] Where did you get the definition of transportation from? [41:38.000 --> 41:39.000] Huh. [41:39.000 --> 41:43.000] Where did you get your definition for transportation from? [41:43.000 --> 41:45.000] The legal dictionary. [41:45.000 --> 41:46.000] No. [41:46.000 --> 41:47.000] Well, okay. [41:47.000 --> 41:50.000] Do not ever cite the legal dictionary as an authority. [41:50.000 --> 41:51.000] Don't do that. [41:51.000 --> 41:53.000] It's not an authority. [41:53.000 --> 42:00.000] Just cite the case in Black's law for the definition. [42:00.000 --> 42:02.000] That's the authority. [42:02.000 --> 42:03.000] Okay. [42:03.000 --> 42:04.000] Okay. [42:04.000 --> 42:05.000] Okay. [42:05.000 --> 42:10.000] In that case, it's Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson. [42:10.000 --> 42:11.000] Okay. [42:11.000 --> 42:12.000] So... [42:12.000 --> 42:13.000] Okay. [42:13.000 --> 42:17.000] There is also a federal definition of transportation. [42:17.000 --> 42:18.000] Find it. [42:18.000 --> 42:20.000] It's in Title 49. [42:20.000 --> 42:23.000] It's USC 31301. [42:23.000 --> 42:24.000] Yes. [42:24.000 --> 42:26.000] It defines transportation. [42:26.000 --> 42:27.000] Yes. [42:27.000 --> 42:30.000] It says transportation equals commerce. [42:30.000 --> 42:31.000] Exactly. [42:31.000 --> 42:35.000] It defines commerce as trade, traffic, or transportation. [42:35.000 --> 42:36.000] Exactly. [42:36.000 --> 42:37.000] Okay. [42:37.000 --> 42:38.000] Okay. [42:38.000 --> 42:44.000] And then when I was pulled over, the card that I had, the state that I wasn't waving [42:44.000 --> 42:49.000] any of my rights, also was on that card, that USC code that you had mentioned. [42:49.000 --> 42:51.000] That was also on the card. [42:51.000 --> 42:55.000] So he was informed that it wasn't a case of transportation based off of the USC code [42:55.000 --> 42:56.000] that you just... [42:56.000 --> 42:57.000] I just mentioned. [42:57.000 --> 42:58.000] Right. [42:58.000 --> 43:02.000] What you need to make sure of, in addition to that, is that the state of Maryland did [43:02.000 --> 43:04.000] not define the term within its own statutes. [43:04.000 --> 43:08.000] I almost guarantee you that they did not, but you need to make sure. [43:08.000 --> 43:15.000] So go to the legislative website where your online statutes are and do a term search [43:15.000 --> 43:24.000] there for transportation means and then also transportation includes. [43:24.000 --> 43:31.000] And put those, not each word, but the phrase transportation means in double quotes. [43:31.000 --> 43:37.000] And then repeat that on the next search with transportation includes inside of double quotes. [43:37.000 --> 43:38.000] Okay. [43:38.000 --> 43:39.000] Okay. [43:39.000 --> 43:41.000] And see how many returns you get. [43:41.000 --> 43:47.000] And if you will look through them, I bet you will find that there is no singular definition [43:47.000 --> 43:49.000] of transportation. [43:49.000 --> 43:50.000] Okay. [43:50.000 --> 43:55.000] And when you find that out, then you've got definitive proof that the state of Maryland [43:55.000 --> 43:57.000] didn't define it and the federal one is controlling. [43:57.000 --> 43:58.000] Hang on just a second. [43:58.000 --> 43:59.000] Let me take this break. [43:59.000 --> 44:00.000] We'll be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:04.000 --> 44:11.000] When your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD [44:11.000 --> 44:15.000] course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [44:15.000 --> 44:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:19.000 --> 44:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:23.000 --> 44:26.000] Thousands have won with our step by step course. [44:26.000 --> 44:28.000] And now you can too. [44:28.000 --> 44:34.000] Your jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [44:39.000 --> 44:43.000] principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:49.000 --> 44:52.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [44:52.000 --> 45:02.000] Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EV. [45:02.000 --> 45:06.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [45:06.000 --> 45:10.000] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [45:10.000 --> 45:14.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality [45:14.000 --> 45:16.000] coins and precious metals. [45:16.000 --> 45:20.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [45:20.000 --> 45:24.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers [45:24.000 --> 45:25.000] and journalists. [45:25.000 --> 45:28.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [45:28.000 --> 45:32.000] In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and [45:32.000 --> 45:33.000] Pollen Burst. [45:33.000 --> 45:38.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storeable Foods, Berkey Water Products, [45:38.000 --> 45:40.000] Ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. [45:40.000 --> 45:44.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment. [45:44.000 --> 45:47.000] Call us at 512-646-6440. [45:47.000 --> 45:52.000] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [45:52.000 --> 45:56.000] We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2. [45:56.000 --> 46:01.000] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [46:12.000 --> 46:14.000] Alright folks, we are back. [46:14.000 --> 46:17.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [46:17.000 --> 46:21.000] Alright, let's see if we can get this caller back online here. [46:21.000 --> 46:22.000] Alright. [46:22.000 --> 46:23.000] Yeah. [46:23.000 --> 46:24.000] I'm sorry. [46:24.000 --> 46:25.000] What is your first name? [46:25.000 --> 46:26.000] Khalid. [46:26.000 --> 46:27.000] Khalid. [46:27.000 --> 46:28.000] Okay. [46:28.000 --> 46:29.000] I have that part right. [46:29.000 --> 46:30.000] So where's the merry fit? [46:30.000 --> 46:31.000] Oh, it's Maryland. [46:31.000 --> 46:32.000] Okay. [46:32.000 --> 46:33.000] I get it now. [46:33.000 --> 46:34.000] Khalid and Mary. [46:34.000 --> 46:35.000] Okay. [46:35.000 --> 46:36.000] I get it. [46:36.000 --> 46:37.000] Alright, Khalid. [46:37.000 --> 46:38.000] Go ahead. [46:38.000 --> 46:39.000] Okay. [46:39.000 --> 46:40.000] So quick question. [46:40.000 --> 46:45.000] When you said transportation means transportation includes, would I look that up on the Maryland [46:45.000 --> 46:47.000] General Assembly website? [46:47.000 --> 46:53.000] Wherever it is that they house their online statutes for the public to view, yes. [46:53.000 --> 46:55.000] Okay, the online statutes for real. [46:55.000 --> 46:58.000] So under the annotated code, okay. [46:58.000 --> 47:03.000] So I just have a question and I just wanted to know your opinion on it for real. [47:03.000 --> 47:08.000] So I know you were saying that we can't, well, did you say that we really can't use [47:08.000 --> 47:13.000] Black's Law Dictionary as a definition in court? [47:13.000 --> 47:15.000] Did it kind of really invalidate? [47:15.000 --> 47:18.000] So I think I'll still ask you anyway for real. [47:18.000 --> 47:25.000] So I was looking, I looked up the definition of crime in the dictionary and it was saying [47:25.000 --> 47:28.000] that it's a violation of public law. [47:28.000 --> 47:34.000] And when I looked up public law, it was saying that it's between state citizens and the [47:34.000 --> 47:35.000] state. [47:35.000 --> 47:41.000] So when I looked at the definition of citizen, basically means a resident. [47:41.000 --> 47:50.000] And so basically, would I be wrong to think that they have to prove residency before [47:50.000 --> 47:52.000] they can charge you with a crime? [47:52.000 --> 47:58.000] All they would have to do to prove residency is show your name on a local address. [47:58.000 --> 47:59.000] Okay. [47:59.000 --> 48:03.000] So now my question, I just want to know your opinion on it. [48:03.000 --> 48:08.000] So I understand that if you show your name on an address, that that proves residency [48:08.000 --> 48:09.000] to them. [48:09.000 --> 48:11.000] But what if you don't limit that address? [48:11.000 --> 48:12.000] Because... [48:12.000 --> 48:13.000] It doesn't matter. [48:13.000 --> 48:15.000] Your name is associated with a local address. [48:15.000 --> 48:18.000] Therefore, residency is presumed. [48:18.000 --> 48:19.000] Okay. [48:19.000 --> 48:24.000] And so there wouldn't be no way to rebut that presumption. [48:24.000 --> 48:26.000] Sure there is if you can show that you don't live there. [48:26.000 --> 48:31.000] But if you, if that's the address that's on all the information you've given them, then [48:31.000 --> 48:34.000] they can't rely on anything outside of that as being factual. [48:34.000 --> 48:36.000] They have to go with what they have. [48:36.000 --> 48:41.000] But the fact that they have it establishes a prima facie case that you are a resident. [48:41.000 --> 48:43.000] Now here's the thing though. [48:43.000 --> 48:49.000] You need to go to my legal blog and look for an article that discusses resident versus [48:49.000 --> 48:50.000] domicile. [48:50.000 --> 48:51.000] Okay. [48:51.000 --> 48:52.000] Okay. [48:52.000 --> 48:56.000] Because they are two very distinctive things in law. [48:56.000 --> 49:04.000] And a resident is someone who is temporary to the location, not necessarily permanent. [49:04.000 --> 49:07.000] Whereas domicile is permanent. [49:07.000 --> 49:10.000] It is your home. [49:10.000 --> 49:11.000] Okay. [49:11.000 --> 49:14.000] And there's plenty of case law on there that shows. [49:14.000 --> 49:16.000] That's how the courts have always viewed that. [49:16.000 --> 49:17.000] Hello. [49:17.000 --> 49:20.000] You there? [49:20.000 --> 49:25.000] Can you hear me? [49:25.000 --> 49:26.000] Khalid? [49:26.000 --> 49:27.000] Okay. [49:27.000 --> 49:34.000] Well, I'll wrap this up even if you can't hear me and it'll be in the recording. [49:34.000 --> 49:41.000] Oh, it appears my caller board may have gone cattywampus here. [49:41.000 --> 49:45.000] All my callers suddenly dropped. [49:45.000 --> 49:47.000] I don't know why. [49:47.000 --> 49:49.000] All right. [49:49.000 --> 49:51.000] That can be a problem. [49:51.000 --> 49:53.000] All right. [49:53.000 --> 49:59.000] 512-646-1984, call back in and let's see if you can get back on the board. [49:59.000 --> 50:02.000] If you can't get on the board before the end of the break, then I'm going to try to figure [50:02.000 --> 50:05.000] out why that is real quick and get back. [50:05.000 --> 50:10.000] Because, yeah, I'll be at the top of the hour break then and hopefully can get it fixed before [50:10.000 --> 50:12.000] we have a big issue with it. [50:12.000 --> 50:21.000] But in any case, in relation to what you were asking, resident and domicile, not the same [50:21.000 --> 50:22.000] thing at all. [50:22.000 --> 50:25.000] So you need to go read the blog and find out what that is. [50:25.000 --> 50:29.000] As far as the defense, here in Texas, one of the things that I noticed about when they [50:29.000 --> 50:35.000] recodified the statute under the transportation title, they did it unconstitutionally. [50:35.000 --> 50:40.000] They did it in a way that violated multiple provisions of the Texas Constitution, thus [50:40.000 --> 50:43.000] invalidating the act in its entirety. [50:43.000 --> 50:45.000] It is void. [50:45.000 --> 50:47.000] It is unenforceable law. [50:47.000 --> 50:52.000] You might want to do your research on how your state constitution says laws are required [50:52.000 --> 50:58.000] to be enacted by the legislature and all the steps required for that. [50:58.000 --> 51:04.000] And then compare that to the actual record on the passage of the act in question. [51:04.000 --> 51:08.000] And then see whether or not they complied with all of the requirements. [51:08.000 --> 51:15.000] For instance, here in Texas, Article 3, Section 35 has a specific requirement that every bill [51:15.000 --> 51:21.000] has to be read on the floor of each house over three several days and discussion, open [51:21.000 --> 51:24.000] discussion held on the bill. [51:24.000 --> 51:30.000] If that does not happen, the bill does not have the force and effect of law. [51:30.000 --> 51:33.000] Cannot have the force and effect of law. [51:33.000 --> 51:38.000] And the Constitution says no bill that doesn't do this shall have the force and effect of [51:38.000 --> 51:39.000] law. [51:39.000 --> 51:41.000] So they didn't do it. [51:41.000 --> 51:47.000] They suspended it and they used a suspension clause that's in the Constitution, but they [51:47.000 --> 51:52.000] used one that's unconstitutional for the type of bill they were using. [51:52.000 --> 52:01.000] The clause they used relates only to fiscal finance bills, funding bills, not to regulatory [52:01.000 --> 52:04.000] bills like what the transportation code is. [52:04.000 --> 52:14.000] Not only that, that specific clause is associated with bills that can only originate in the [52:14.000 --> 52:17.000] House of Representatives because it's a finance bill. [52:17.000 --> 52:22.000] The transportation code originated as a Senate bill, SB 971. [52:22.000 --> 52:29.000] And because it's a Senate bill, it can't use the same suspension clause that is related [52:29.000 --> 52:32.000] to finance bills. [52:32.000 --> 52:38.000] The only suspension clause allows to be used in relation to bills that are not financial [52:38.000 --> 52:44.000] in nature comes under Article III, Section 62 of the Texas Constitution. [52:44.000 --> 52:50.000] And there is a whole slew of specific steps and requirements that have to be met before [52:50.000 --> 52:55.000] the procedural rules, including the reading on the floor of each House in open discussion, [52:55.000 --> 52:57.000] can be suspended. [52:57.000 --> 53:00.000] And those were not done. [53:00.000 --> 53:02.000] The suspension was illegal. [53:02.000 --> 53:05.000] It was unconstitutional on its face. [53:05.000 --> 53:08.000] And that's just one of several reasons. [53:08.000 --> 53:13.000] The bill itself perpetrated fraud upon the public when it said that it contained no substantive [53:13.000 --> 53:21.000] changes or substantive changes to the law itself in the new bill, when, in fact, that's [53:21.000 --> 53:28.000] exactly what it did was implement an entire plethora of substantive changes. [53:28.000 --> 53:31.000] For instance, driver's licenses. [53:31.000 --> 53:37.000] The original forms of license prior to 1995 was an operator's license, commercial operator's [53:37.000 --> 53:39.000] license, and a chauffeur's license. [53:39.000 --> 53:44.000] Those are the actual forms of permanent license that exist in the state of Texas. [53:44.000 --> 53:51.000] However, those three forms of license do not appear at all in SB 971, nor do they appear [53:51.000 --> 53:57.000] currently anywhere within any part of the Texas Transportation Code, as it's been recodified. [53:57.000 --> 54:05.000] Thus, a substantive change was made because prior to 1995, Texas courts ruled there was [54:05.000 --> 54:08.000] no such thing in Texas law as a driver's license. [54:08.000 --> 54:17.000] Yet, in 1995, it created a driver's license, but it forgot to put the actual licenses into [54:17.000 --> 54:21.000] the code to which that driver's license actually applied. [54:21.000 --> 54:28.000] Instead, the driver's license is defined solely as the temporary forms of the original learner's [54:28.000 --> 54:37.000] permit out-of-state application, out-of-state temporary license, and the occupational license. [54:37.000 --> 54:43.000] Those are the three temporary forms of licenses in Texas that relate to either the gaining [54:43.000 --> 54:50.000] of the permanent license or to the suspension of the permanent license, and thus having to [54:50.000 --> 54:55.000] have one to get to and from work and to and from shopping and food and things like that [54:55.000 --> 54:58.000] necessary to survival. [54:58.000 --> 55:04.000] Again, check your state constitution on how those laws were made, and let's see what that gets you. [55:04.000 --> 55:06.000] It looks like the call-in board is back up. [55:06.000 --> 55:10.000] I'm getting people back up online, so if you're still listening to me, then go ahead and call back in [55:10.000 --> 55:12.000] and we'll finish up this discussion real quick. [55:12.000 --> 55:18.000] The fact of the matter is that if you check these things, you may possibly find that Maryland [55:18.000 --> 55:23.000] didn't do any better job of recodifying their statutes than the legislature of Texas did [55:23.000 --> 55:26.000] because they screwed the pooch royally here. [55:26.000 --> 55:34.000] There is no way the Texas Constitution allowed the Texas Transportation Code to be a valid enactment [55:34.000 --> 55:40.000] because everything that was done to enact it violated the provisions of the Constitution outright. [55:40.000 --> 55:42.000] No question about it, no way to deny it. [55:42.000 --> 55:49.000] The only thing they can do is just say the Constitution doesn't matter and pee on it and then the revolution will start [55:49.000 --> 55:55.000] because that's exactly what they're pushing to the forefront when they do that. [55:55.000 --> 56:01.000] Because the Constitution of Texas very clearly states these are mandatory requisites. [56:01.000 --> 56:02.000] These are not options. [56:02.000 --> 56:08.000] These are mandatory, and when they fail to comply with them, they invalidate the very laws they're trying to create, [56:08.000 --> 56:13.000] and that's exactly what they did in this case. [56:13.000 --> 56:21.000] So, that being said, I've got two and a half minutes here, so I'm going to start up real quick with one other caller. [56:21.000 --> 56:27.000] Cox and Gloria, who am I talking to? 512 area code. [56:27.000 --> 56:28.000] This is Joe. [56:28.000 --> 56:30.000] Hi, hey Joe. What's up? [56:30.000 --> 56:31.000] Hey, Mary. [56:31.000 --> 56:33.000] Where is Gloria? [56:33.000 --> 56:35.000] She is my wife. [56:35.000 --> 56:37.000] Oh, okay. [56:37.000 --> 56:42.000] Yeah, it comes up her name typically whenever it comes up on caller ID. [56:42.000 --> 56:46.000] Yeah, okay. Well, now I know, so I'll know in the future. [56:46.000 --> 56:48.000] Yeah, there you go. [56:48.000 --> 56:59.000] So anyways, I was looking through some records and it appears that this time, three years ago, okay, I had a traffic stop [56:59.000 --> 57:05.000] and it was actually one of my first attempts at trying to defend, you know, I didn't know anything. [57:05.000 --> 57:09.000] I screwed the whole thing up, obviously, but I didn't know any better. [57:09.000 --> 57:15.000] I mean, I was studying this stuff, but, you know, I was very new at it. [57:15.000 --> 57:24.000] Anyways, I submitted all my stuff, my motions or whatever, went to the motions hearing, and all the motions were denied out of hand. [57:24.000 --> 57:28.000] I mean, he just announced that I think they're frivolous and denied them. [57:28.000 --> 57:33.000] There was never any other kind of a ruling or an order or anything. [57:33.000 --> 57:39.000] Everything just stopped like there was nothing ever, no more communication period between me and that court ever until now. [57:39.000 --> 57:41.000] And I got to thinking about that. [57:41.000 --> 57:46.000] There's got to be something that either, I mean, do I need to be worried about it? [57:46.000 --> 57:48.000] Well, which should I do? [57:48.000 --> 57:57.000] Because let's just say that when the time comes for me to either renew my license or let it lapse, as we talked about in class a year or two ago, whatever it was. [57:57.000 --> 58:03.000] I haven't decided which one I'm going to deal with that yet, but at some point in time, they're going to want that money. [58:03.000 --> 58:12.000] And since there has been no communication back and forth between the courts, no order, no nuts between me and the court, how should I handle that? [58:12.000 --> 58:14.000] How should I proceed with that? [58:14.000 --> 58:16.000] Well, what was it for? [58:16.000 --> 58:19.000] It was for speeding. [58:19.000 --> 58:26.000] Okay, well, speeding is not one of those things that they can give you an administrative suspension for. [58:26.000 --> 58:35.000] But if the court has failed to prosecute and they've never filed a complaint or followed up on the complaint, they're outside of their statute of limitations if it was more than two years ago. [58:35.000 --> 58:37.000] They all just second will address that on the other side. [58:37.000 --> 58:41.000] All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is a call-in number. [58:41.000 --> 58:46.000] If you want to call and get in line, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. [58:46.000 --> 58:50.000] We will be right back after this break. [58:50.000 --> 58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:06.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:18.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:28.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:44.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:44.000 --> 59:48.000] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:48.000 --> 59:51.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:51.000 --> 01:00:17.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:24.000] LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:00:47.000 --> 01:01:02.000] Today in history, the year 1870, the Roman Catholic holiday of Christmas is declared a federal holiday in the United States. [01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:07.000] Today in history. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:22.000] And recent news. Representative Michael Burgess, Republican from the 26th Texas Congressional District, Centering in Denton County, defended the controversial conditions in which the facilities being used to house child immigrants are supposedly found in on MSNBC earlier this week. [01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:31.000] The lawmaker stated, quote, I've been to Casa Padre in Brownsville, Texas. And yes, it's a restored Walmart. And you know what? There's not a lock on the door. [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Any child is free to leave at any time, but they don't. You know why? Because they are well taken care of. And that they are, quote, free to leave at any time. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:47.000] Apparently children must leave the facility with a parent or guardian who has passed a background check if they wish to stay in the United States. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:53.000] But the child is free to leave by themselves if they return to where they came from. [01:01:53.000 --> 01:02:02.000] General Motors Company is planning on investing $20 million at its Arlington Assembly plant in order to fit it to build the next generation of GM's full-size SUVs. [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:15.000] General Johnson, GM Executive Vice President of Global Manufacturing stated that, quote, We've been building trucks in Texas for more than 20 years, and our additional investment in Arlington Assembly is proof of our commitment and confidence in our Arlington team. [01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:27.000] The automaker built the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, and the catalog escalated at the 250-acre Arlington plant. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:39.000] Findings in a report released by the insurance company Allstate looked into collision claims across the U.S. Two Texas cities made the list of safest cities to drive in with Laredo at number five and McAllen at number nine. [01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000] So let's keep driving safe, Texas. [01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000] He blowed down his career looking for sponsors. You have a product or a service that can advertise with us. [01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:54.000] Feel free to shoot me an email at rickrodyatprotomail.com. That's rickrodyrohce.com. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:23.000] This was the lowdown for Q and 26, 2019. [01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:27.000] All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:31.000] We are now at the top of the hour. We've got four segments left in this show. [01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:37.000] All right. Now, let's see if we can get back to Joe here and get his question answered. [01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:42.000] All right. When was this ticket issued? [01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:51.000] It was in July of, well, it was three years ago, so what, 2016? Let me look at this. I'll find it real fast. [01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:58.000] So that was three years old, so let me put this thing back up. [01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:02.000] Did you ever check the court record to see what had been filed? [01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:11.000] Well, there's, okay, so Bastrop County, I went online to their website, and this was the last time I looked at it. [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:18.000] This was about a year and a half ago, and it showed that there was a fine due or, you know, payment due for a fine. [01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:26.000] But, I mean, like I said, I never received anything. I was never given any court orders or anything. [01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:30.000] Did you plea out? Did you go to court? What? [01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:33.000] No, all we had was a motion hearing. [01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:43.000] Okay. Don't use the online system, okay? It is never complete. It is never up to date. Go check the court file. [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:49.000] Go get a copy of everything that's in the file that you didn't put there. [01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:52.000] Was there a proper complaint ever filed? [01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:53.000] No. [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:57.000] Well, then there are SOL. [01:04:57.000 --> 01:04:58.000] Okay. [01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:03.000] But you need to check the record to make damn sure of that. [01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:07.000] Okay, and if I see that they have filed one after the fact, [01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:13.000] then it's not going to do them any good. They're outside the statute of limitations, and Chapter 45 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:20.000] specifically says that any complaint filed must be, must not be time barred. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:27.000] And that's exactly what it's talking about is the statute of limitations, two years time from the day to the event. [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:30.000] Okay. [01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:32.000] Okay. [01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:35.000] Well, that's what I need to know then. [01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:40.000] I looked up a little bit. I didn't have much time to spend on today. I just found that today was, and it just crossed my mind. [01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:44.000] So I started looking up statute of limitations and kind of trying to do some research on it. [01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:46.000] And I haven't gotten too far at this point yet. [01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000] But that's kind of what I was needing to know was like, okay, so just need to see what it is they were trying to do. [01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:00.000] I said it just, I went through, I filed all the judicial kind of complaints about everything and never heard another word. [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:08.000] It just kind of went away. But I needed to make sure that, oh, no, I know that I was stopped a year ago. [01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:11.000] I think, you know, I talked about that one and this never came up. [01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:16.000] So it didn't show up on any kind of a, you know, there's no warrant, stuff like that associated with it. [01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:22.000] So I guess I do need to check and see if it just totally disappeared or what they did. [01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:28.000] Yeah, compare it to Article 45.019 Requests of a Complaint. [01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:35.000] Okay. But I'm going to state the date of the offense was committed. [01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:41.000] I'm going to spare the signature. [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:50.000] Let's see. [01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:55.000] Yeah. [01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:58.000] Yeah, it's all there in 45.019. [01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:00.000] Okay. [01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:02.000] All right, I will look it up. Thank you, sir. [01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:04.000] All right. [01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:06.000] Look at that. [01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:08.000] Thanks for calling, Joe. [01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:11.000] All right, next up is Adam in Texas. [01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000] Adam, what can I do for you? [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000] Hey, Eddie, how's it going? [01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:17.000] It's going. [01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000] Um, there any way you can turn your speaker up, I can barely hear you. [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:27.000] I don't know if I can turn it up or not. How's that? [01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:29.000] Yeah, I don't know. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:33.000] Recent lately, you know, in the last few months when I call you or Randy, [01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:35.000] y'all are really hard to hear. [01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:37.000] It should not be that way. I don't know. [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:43.000] Yeah, I'll check with Deborah and see if there's anything on the sound settings that may be different. [01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:45.000] Okay. [01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:52.000] But I've got it. I've got my side turned up as loud as I can go without going into squelch mode. [01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:56.000] Cool. Cool. Yeah. All right. Well, I mean, I can hear you enough. [01:07:56.000 --> 01:08:04.000] Well, like the first caller said, y'all should, you know, people need to donate. [01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:09.000] Y'all's services are invaluable. [01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:16.000] And I'd like to say if, you know, if you're not actively listening to Randy and Eddie [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:20.000] and reading the laws and doing your study and, and, and learning how to fight, [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:25.000] if you're not actually doing that, take down your American flag off your wall, [01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:29.000] fold it up, put it in a drawer, take your American flag details off your car. [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:32.000] And if you're ever at a game and ask you to stand for the pledge of allegiance, [01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:36.000] just sit down and shut up because you're not an American. [01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:39.000] We don't fight for these rights. We're going to lose them. [01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:44.000] So get, get, get in the, get, get, get with the plan, get with the program. [01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:57.000] Anyway, so my question is about Texas stops an incident to, incident to arrest, [01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:00.000] searches incident to arrest, things of that nature. [01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:09.000] I got pulled over for a, a, a buddy throughout a beer can, which is open container, [01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:16.000] which is covered in penal code 49 and transportation code 543 and everything like that. [01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:22.000] But my question is, and I've been looking up the case laws and reading up on this stuff. [01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:25.000] As soon as I got pulled over, I wasn't even the one who had it. [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:26.000] You know, I didn't have an open container. [01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:30.000] It's a buddy riding, riding shotgun anyhow. [01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:35.000] We got pulled over and they immediately told everybody to get out of the car, [01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:42.000] started grabbing people, pulling them out of the car and handcuffed all three of us [01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:49.000] and stood on the side of the road and then they wanted to know about the open container. [01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:53.000] And as they pulled us down, they told my wife to lock the door and shut up behind you. [01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:56.000] She did and they said, oh, no, don't you, don't you shut that door? [01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:58.000] She said, I'll shut my door if I want to. [01:09:58.000 --> 01:09:59.000] She locked it and shut it. [01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:02.000] I got out, locked mine, shut it. [01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000] You know, of course, that raises their suspicion, but who cares? [01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:07.000] You know, I'm not going to leave you in the car. [01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:11.000] And I don't want, I don't want their grubby hands in my property. [01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:20.000] So the question is, what authority do they have to just, I mean, over an open container [01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:23.000] and you know, an alleged open container offense? [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:24.000] They don't. [01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:29.000] Open container is not an arrestable offense under the Transportation Code. [01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:30.000] So why were all three of them? [01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:33.000] They are required to issue a citation and move on. [01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:38.000] There are only two things that they have to get a signature for the citation on. [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:41.000] And one of them is open container and the other is speeding. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:44.000] But they're not allowed to simply just take you to jail for it. [01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:46.000] Did they do that? [01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:51.000] No, nobody was taken to jail and what you're talking about is covered in 543 [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:52.000] Texas Transportation Code. [01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:53.000] Right. [01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:55.000] If anybody wants to go look it up. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000] No, nobody was taken to jail. [01:10:57.000 --> 01:11:02.000] You know, I even told them, I said, you know, this is an open container violation. [01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:04.000] Let's get the ticket wrote. [01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:07.000] Well, technically it's a littering violation. [01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:11.000] Yeah, and littering, okay. [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:13.000] Well, littering, whatever. [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:16.000] Yeah, see, in order for them to prove open container, they would have had to have [01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:21.000] found it in the vehicle and it would have had to have contained something. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:22.000] Right. [01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:24.000] And it was not found in the vehicle. [01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:25.000] Yeah. [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:28.000] And by then I'm sure it was empty when he tossed it, right? [01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.000] Oh, I don't remember. [01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:31.000] Maybe it was half full. [01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:33.000] It don't matter. [01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:38.000] So, so what happened was we're staying there handcuffed all of us, you know, [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:43.000] and the cops like, you know, y'all tell us who threw the can out or we're going to [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000] give all three of y'all open container citation and, you know, nobody said anything. [01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:49.000] Oh, good. [01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:51.000] Oh, good. [01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:54.000] Y'all should have said go right ahead. [01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:56.000] You should have said that in unison. [01:11:56.000 --> 01:11:59.000] You should have said go right ahead. [01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:04.000] And then you should have demanded the video from the, from their cars and their bodycams [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:10.000] because right there that proves that they falsified charges without knowing who they [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:12.000] were charging for what. [01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:14.000] They had no clue who was guilty. [01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:16.000] They had no clue who committed the offense. [01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:20.000] And yet they're going to falsely charge everybody for the same offense. [01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:21.000] I know, I know, I know. [01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:22.000] Yes, you're right. [01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:26.000] Which is a simultaneously said, okay, but you know, that's, that's ridiculous. [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:30.000] You can't get three people staying ticket for one can. [01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:34.000] I was hoping they do that so I could go beat the crap out of the JP. [01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:37.000] But so no, what happened was. [01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:39.000] So we're sitting there handcuffed. [01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:43.000] You know, I made sure my doors were locked and shut. [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:48.000] And I've been reading case law about, you know, searches into arrest, which, you know, [01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:50.000] we weren't arrested for anything. [01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:51.000] We were handcuffed. [01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:52.000] No, no, no, no, no, no, no. [01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:54.000] The moment they pulled you over, you were arrested. [01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:59.000] The question is whether or not they were going to attempt to take possession of you in the car. [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:02.000] That's the, that's the varying distinction there. [01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:11.000] If they weren't going to take possession of you and the car, then they would not have had any lawful authority to search it without a warrant. [01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:13.000] That's, I'm getting to exactly. [01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:23.000] So what happened was we're sitting there handcuffed and they're asking us questions and stuff and we're kind of, you know, laughing at them. [01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:29.000] You know, we don't care, like, what are you going to do, punks? [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:37.000] And they take my key ring off my belt loop and they say, is this the key to the truck? [01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:39.000] And I didn't answer. [01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:40.000] It says, is this the key to the truck? [01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:42.000] And they just took it. [01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:43.000] They unlocked me. [01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000] This is why we're already all out of the car already. [01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:48.000] We're handcuffed. [01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:50.000] Okay, right there. [01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:59.000] You have burglary of a vehicle, file a criminal complaint against the cop that took your keys and burgled your vehicle. [01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:02.000] That's a felony in the state of Texas. [01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:07.000] He had no legal basis or authority to enter that, that truck at all. [01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:08.000] Period. Period. [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:09.000] Yeah. [01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:12.000] So I told him, I said, I said, what are you doing? [01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:16.000] I said, you do not have my consent to search my car. [01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:18.000] Get out of my property. [01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:26.000] And he went on his merry way, but when he unlocked the door and started getting in the car, you know what he was looking for? [01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:31.000] He was rifling through my wife's purse to find her driver's license so he could identify everybody. [01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:33.000] That's what he was searching for. [01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:40.000] He wasn't searching for more open containers, which it wouldn't matter anyway, because if you have a thousand open beer cans, still one charge. [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:42.000] He wasn't searching for any of that stuff. [01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:55.000] He was searching my wife's purse for her driver's license so he could find out who everybody was, which we all know that the recent ruins on passengers not having to identify themselves during traffic stop is clear as day is not. [01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:57.000] It is. [01:14:57.000 --> 01:14:59.000] Yeah, so what was he doing, Eddie? [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000] He was breaking the law. [01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:02.000] That's what I just said. [01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:03.000] I told him he was breaking the law. [01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:04.000] I said, you're welcome. [01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:07.000] Well, do something about it. [01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:08.000] I'm going to do something about it. [01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:10.000] I just want to double check. [01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:19.000] Yeah, so look under the penal code for burglary of a vehicle. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:32.000] Write out a sworn statement that you witnessed this officer illegally burglarize your vehicle in plain view of you and two other witnesses at another officer who did nothing to stop him. [01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:36.000] Regardless of if he destroyed or took anything out of the vehicle. [01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:37.000] Correct. [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:40.000] It's not a requisite under the under the penal code. [01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:41.000] They don't have to take anything. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:49.000] They simply have to break the barrier of the between interior and exterior of the car without consent or permission. [01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:50.000] Yeah. [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:51.000] Well, she. [01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:57.000] Yeah, he didn't have because I mean, I've been looking at caseball forever and like, he just doesn't have it. [01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:02.000] I mean, yeah, okay, you might be able to search the, you know, immediate. [01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:08.000] No, they can only search the immediate area surrounding passengers and the driver. [01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:10.000] You were outside the car. [01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:16.000] There was no legal basis for him to enter it once it was locked and you were not in it. [01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:19.000] He could not enter the car without a warrant. [01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:21.000] Period. [01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000] Yeah, that's what I was thinking, man. [01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:24.000] That's what I was thinking. [01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:29.000] And much less to go fishing from a through my wife's purse for drivers. [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000] You don't have anything to do with it. [01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:33.000] Yeah. [01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:34.000] They just, he's caught. [01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:35.000] They just think oh. [01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:36.000] Yeah. [01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:41.000] They think they can get away with whatever they want because most people are too ignorant to know what they can and cannot rightfully do. [01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:44.000] So they just tend to whine and cry and do nothing about it later. [01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000] Don't be that person. [01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000] I'm not going to be that person. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:52.000] No, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I already got my dreams up for you guys a long time ago. [01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:53.000] I'm, I'm trying man. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:54.000] I won't fight. [01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:55.000] Um. [01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:56.000] All right. [01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000] Hang on. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:16:59.000] Okay. [01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:33.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:38.000] The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:40.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com. [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. [01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:00.000] To learn how to stop debt collectors net. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:01.000] I love logos. [01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:04.000] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:07.000] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:08.000] I need my truth pick. [01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:10.000] I'd be lost without logos. [01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:13.000] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:20.000] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplement. [01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000] How can I help logos? [01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000] Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:29.000] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. [01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:31.000] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:34.000] Now, go to logosradio network.com. [01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:37.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:43.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000] Do I pay extra? [01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000] No. [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000] No. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000] No. [01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000] I mean, yes. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:55.000] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [01:18:55.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Thank you so much. [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000] You're welcome. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:23.000] Happy holidays, logos. [01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:25.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:28.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:31.000] Call it number 512-646-1984. [01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:34.000] All right, let's see if we can finish up with Adam in Texas. [01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:35.000] All right, Adam. [01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:41.000] All right, I'm going to go for, yeah, a burglary of automobile and let the courts figure that out. [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:43.000] I'm going to run that up just to keep all. [01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:44.000] Yeah. [01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:48.000] And don't forget to file both a criminal complaint and an internal affairs complaint against the cop. [01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:50.000] Both of them, in fact. [01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:52.000] Are you talking about C? [01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:53.000] No. [01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:56.000] I'm talking about their police department. [01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:00.000] Okay, in addition to the T-Close. [01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:02.000] No. [01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:10.000] Criminal charges with the county and district attorney or the grand jury and an internal affairs complaint with their police department. [01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:17.000] If you're going to inform against anyone else about it, if you can file, T-Close can't do anything to the officer. [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:20.000] His department's the only one responsible for that. [01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:30.000] T-Close could only suspend his license upon something his department tells them to do or that some judge tells them to do. [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:35.000] But they cannot, will not just spend his license on their own. [01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:37.000] Yeah, well, that's not what I'm looking for. [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:41.000] You know, the T-Close area is a little gray and I've heard that. [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:43.000] T-Close isn't going to help you. [01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:46.000] They're not going to do anything to this guy. [01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:49.000] Yeah, but doesn't it still make a permanent black? [01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:52.000] No, it doesn't attach it to him in any way, shape, or form. [01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:57.000] They'll file 13 and it never existed. [01:20:57.000 --> 01:20:58.000] Yeah. [01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:07.000] That's why I said you need to put it in his internal personnel file, which is why you go to the internal affairs department and file a complaint against him with his department. [01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:10.000] That goes in his personnel file. [01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:12.000] Gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. [01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:14.000] Okay. [01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:16.000] Yeah, I was, I don't know. [01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:20.000] You know, when it happens, you pull that over and you try to remember everything, but I don't know. [01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:21.000] We handle it pretty well. [01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:24.000] We're pretty much laughing at a bunch of jerks. [01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:34.000] Real quick, Chapter 18, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, dealing with warrants. [01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:45.000] The way I read it, the magistrate who issued the search warrant is supposed to be the same magistrate who conducts the examinee trial. [01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:49.000] No, that's not necessarily true. [01:21:49.000 --> 01:22:00.000] It's possible that it can be, but it's not necessarily true that it will be because there's nothing that requires one to immediately occur upon the completion of the other. [01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:03.000] Yeah. [01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:15.000] Earlier, you were talking about some fellow you're helping or whatever, and you finally got the warrant documents and stuff, you know, free information or public information request. [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:31.000] I'm about to be doing the same thing in another county over a search warrant for blood that was issued, and I've been reading it up in Chapter 18, and I can almost guarantee that all the requirements listed in there. [01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:35.000] More than half of them were not done properly or not done at all. [01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:47.000] My only concern is when I go in for the public information request, which we're allowed to do anonymously, but, like Rainey says, you don't ever want to let them know exactly what you're looking for. [01:22:47.000 --> 01:23:06.000] So I'm trying to figure out the best way to go about getting the requirements out of Chapter 18 from the district court without them giving them the chance to omit or change or do anything to the documents. [01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:14.000] You know, I don't want to give them a heads up of what I'm trying to do, and so that's kind of an issue right now. [01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.000] What would you suggest? [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:19.000] Well, do it piecemeal. [01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:24.000] Don't try to do it all in one shot from one place. [01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:27.000] So, yeah, move around with different mailing addresses? [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:30.000] Well, no, no, no, that's not what I'm getting at. [01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:34.000] You can have different people file requests for these public records, okay? [01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:36.000] That's one way of doing it. [01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:46.000] So have different people in different locations do it on your behalf, you know, without using your name, and then get all the records together and use them yourself. [01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:47.000] That's one way. [01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:54.000] The other way is just to divide up your information request according to who has what, and that's the only way to get it anyway. [01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:58.000] And if you try to send it all to one place, it's going to wind up not getting what you want. [01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:10.000] So it's very unlikely that they're going to piece the entire picture together of what you're doing because you have to ask multiple people in multiple places for the multiple pieces of information. [01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:24.000] For instance, audio and video you're going to get from the police department, court records you're going to get from the court, certain other records that are historical in nature for courts or whatever, you may have to go to the county or municipal clerk to get. [01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:25.000] See what I'm saying? [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:26.000] Yeah. [01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:32.000] So it all depends on who is the custodian of the specific record you are requesting. [01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:35.000] Well, the custodian of the blood warrant is going to be the district clerk. [01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:40.000] The district judge is the one who issued the search warrant. [01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:53.000] Well, actually, the district clerk's records, they may have a separate section for them, but they're still going to be at the county clerk's office almost certainly. [01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:00.000] Okay, so maybe try to, okay, still be at the county level. [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:06.000] Yeah, they'll be maintained at the county level, but they'll be within the county to which it applied. [01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:11.000] For instance, a district court covers more than one county. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:12.000] Yeah. [01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:13.000] Okay. [01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:14.000] Yeah. [01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:22.000] So generally speaking, there will be a copy of that record in whatever county that proceeding applied to. [01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:24.000] Okay. [01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:25.000] All right. [01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:28.000] Well, I'm going to keep hammering, man. [01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:29.000] Appreciate your time. [01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:30.000] Yes, sir. [01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:31.000] Next caller. [01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:32.000] All right. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:33.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:34.000] All right. [01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:37.000] Now we have, Khalid is back. [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000] Let's see if we can finish up with him. [01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:39.000] All right, Khalid. [01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:41.000] Hey, I know what was happening. [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:43.000] Did you hear the rest of what I said? [01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:45.000] Now you hear nothing. [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:46.000] Okay. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:47.000] Well, all right. [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:52.000] All right, if you go back and download the archive when she's done with it, getting it up here in a few days, [01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:54.000] it'll be up on the website and you can pull it down. [01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:00.000] You'll hear all the additional stuff I suggest that you take into consideration when you're doing your research and look it up. [01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:08.000] One of those being the way that Texas has done it makes the act itself the recodification of the transportation code completely unconstitutional [01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:11.000] and therefore the entire code is void. [01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:18.000] That's one of the things that I've managed to prove through public records and disclosure of those public records here in Texas. [01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:25.000] You might find that the same thing occurred in Maryland, thus invalidating the entire code where they can't enforce any of it. [01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:28.000] Much less the part they're trying to use against you now. [01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:29.000] Okay. [01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:36.000] So you're saying that by Maryland recodifying the code that puts the vehicle laws in transportation is unconstitutional? [01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:37.000] No, no, no, no, no, no. [01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:38.000] That's not what I'm saying. [01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:44.000] I'm saying it's possible that it's unconstitutional if they didn't do it the way the Constitution says they must. [01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:45.000] Okay. [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:53.000] And what you do is find in your state Constitution where it tells the legislature how laws for the state of Maryland are to be enacted [01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:57.000] and find every clause that deals with the enactment and passage of law. [01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:58.000] Period. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:26:59.000] Okay. [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:10.000] Then when you go find the original bill that was used to recodify the code into its current form, whatever year that hit, what you told me at the beginning, 74, 76, something like that. [01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:11.000] So yes, and a bill for it. [01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:12.000] Yes, and a bill for it. [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:13.000] Okay. [01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:19.000] Then you get the historical record of that bill and you look at all of the stuff that was associated with it. [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:24.000] For instance, does Maryland have a suspension clause that allows them to suspend reading of the bill? [01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:27.000] Does it require reading of the bill? [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:30.000] Et cetera, et cetera. [01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:38.000] There's all kinds of reasons why it could be invalid if it was enacted in any way that fails to comply with constitutional requirements. [01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:56.000] Because here in Texas, we have Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights that says very clearly, any act created by the legislature or any government activity by any branch of the government that violates any provision of the Texas Constitution is null and void and unenforceable. [01:27:56.000 --> 01:27:57.000] Okay. [01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000] That is in our Bill of Rights. [01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:01.000] Okay. [01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:10.000] And the Texas Transportation Code falls squarely within that violation and makes it completely void law. [01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:11.000] Okay. [01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:17.000] So what I have to, so I would be set to find out how Senate Bill 40 was passed. [01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:27.000] You need to find out if it passed in accordance with all of the constitutional requirements for how law is to be enacted in the state of Maryland. [01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:29.000] Okay. [01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:30.000] Okay. [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:34.000] So I think that's about it. [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:38.000] I'm going to go ahead and check that out how laws are enacted in Maryland. [01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:39.000] All right. [01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:43.000] But so the recodification, that's the secondary point. [01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:44.000] Right. [01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:52.000] Recodification is simply a reorganization, a gathering reorganization and renumbering of existing law into a single code. [01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:53.000] Okay. [01:28:53.000 --> 01:29:07.000] However, most states have a clause at the beginning that says that there are no substantive changes, substantive changes within the law that they are recodifying from the original law that it's coming from. [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:13.000] Because they're not rewriting the law, they're simply restating the law in a more organized form. [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:16.000] That's the story they give us. [01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:29.000] What you can look at is say what was the original law prior to this bill and then do all of the provisions of the new codification make any changes that would be considered substantive to that. [01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:41.000] Like they did here in Texas when they completely obliterated all three original forms of license and replaced them with a singular reference to the temporary versions of those original licenses. [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:44.000] Thus invalidating licenses as a whole. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.000] That's a substantive change. [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:48.000] They completely screwed the pooch. [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:51.000] That's the way I have it in the report. [01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000] It's in the bill 40. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:58.000] It said that it got rid of chauffeur because they were older terms and... [01:29:58.000 --> 01:29:59.000] Yeah. [01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:00.000] Hang on just a second. [01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:11.000] Does stress make your hair turn gray? For years, silver foxes have been claiming as much, but scientists now say they can explain why. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:17.000] I'm Dr. Kauffern Albrecht and I'll be right back to tell you how stress ages us prematurely. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:23.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:42.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:48.000] When the going gets tough, the hairs turn gray. [01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:55.000] It may sound like folklore, but scientists say chronic stress really does make us look older and heightens the risk of disease. [01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:03.000] During a four-week experiment, Duke University researchers injected mice with an adrenaline-like compound that mimics stress in human beings. [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:10.000] They found a sharp reduction in P53, a protein that keeps cells healthy and prevents cancer. [01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:19.000] When the mice's level of P53 stayed low, their chromosomes began to develop irregularities that sped up the aging process and increased their risk of cancer. [01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:25.000] So don't skip that vacation. It may do more than just calm your mind. It could help keep you young. [01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:02.000] My nephew, my son, go to BuildingWhat.org. YFL, why it matters, and what you can do. [01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:36.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:51.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material for ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:04.000] Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:28.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:28.000 --> 01:33:36.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, by the night show with your host, Eddie Craig, and we are talking to Khalid in Maryland. [01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:41.000] All right, Khalid, real quick, do you know where my legal blog is? [01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000] Yes, I do. [01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000] You do? [01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:53.000] Yeah, okay. On there, go look for a article titled Working Outline of Motion Challenging Constitutionality. [01:33:53.000 --> 01:34:02.000] And it's a long title, Entire Recodification of Texas Transportation Code, blah, blah, blah, blah, but that'll be enough to pull it up and find it. [01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:17.000] When you read through that, you will see how I'm taking the Texas Constitution and the specific provisions dealing with how laws are to be enacted and how I am contrasting them with how the bill itself was passed. [01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:18.000] Okay? [01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:19.000] Okay. [01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:31.000] And there you will see, you will get an idea of what you need to be looking for in your own state constitution by doing that and then what to be looking for in the bill. [01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:32.000] Okay? [01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:33.000] Okay. [01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:41.000] And that'll give you a leg up on trying to figure out how this works and how it was supposed to work. [01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:43.000] Okay, I'll definitely check that out. [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:48.000] And you said you were explaining more about the resident versus the homicide, right? I know we got disconnected, but... [01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:49.000] Say that last part again? [01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:52.000] The resident versus domicile part. [01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:56.000] Yeah, there's another article on the blog that goes into that as well. [01:34:56.000 --> 01:34:59.000] And it has to do with Texas juries. [01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:01.000] Do you know where your jury came from? [01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:03.000] Yes, I was reading it. [01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:11.000] It was saying how resident and domicile are two totally different things for real. [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:13.000] Yes, they're absolutely different things. [01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:15.000] Always have been. [01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:24.000] See, your representatives, when they travel around for you within your state or to different states when they're in Congress, they're residents. [01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:26.000] They're moving from place to place. [01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:28.000] They're only there temporarily. [01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:31.000] People that are transient through your state are residents. [01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:33.000] They're only there temporarily. [01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:42.000] But if you are domiciled there as your home, then you are not a resident. [01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:43.000] Yes, too. [01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:46.000] Okay. [01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:56.000] And if a law is specifically written to a resident, then you need to figure out how the law defines resident. [01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:10.000] Because if it's not making a distinction between resident and domiciled, then there's a possibility it can be argued that the blog is vague and ambiguous as to who it applies to because they're not the same thing. [01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:21.000] It's being applied to people who are domiciled here, and yet the law specifically directed at residents. [01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:22.000] Exactly. [01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:29.000] So I should go in the law and see how resident and domicile define and see if there's any separation. [01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:30.000] I'm almost getting to you. [01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:32.000] Your law doesn't define it. [01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:35.000] You're going to have to find that case law defines it. [01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:36.000] Okay. [01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:37.000] I'll definitely look up the case law. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:46.000] But I'll be definitely thinking that because I'm like, if we move around all the time, how can you determine where I'm domiciled in this case? [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:53.000] Well, as a citizen of a state, you can move around anywhere you want in the state and still be domiciled there. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:54.000] Okay. [01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:57.000] Doesn't matter how often you change addresses within the state. [01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:58.000] You're domiciled there. [01:36:58.000 --> 01:36:59.000] That's your home. [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:00.000] The state of. [01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:01.000] You're a citizen of. [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:03.000] That's your home. [01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:07.000] It's when you're going across those state lines to various places all over. [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:08.000] Okay. [01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:11.000] That make you resident. [01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:14.000] Oh, okay. [01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:16.000] Okay. [01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:18.000] Now you can always change your domicile. [01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:19.000] Don't get me wrong. [01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:28.000] If you no longer like Maryland and you want to relocate to Texas and become permanently domiciled here, then your domicile switches. [01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:32.000] And then anytime you go back to Maryland, you're simply a resident. [01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:34.000] Oh, so the resident. [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:37.000] So you basically send a resident apply for all the other states. [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:42.000] But if you're basically in Maryland, but it was saying that these, um, diamond is domiciled judged off. [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:45.000] It was saying by your tax return or something like that. [01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:46.000] No, domiciled. [01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:48.000] No, it tells you in there in the art. [01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:49.000] Read the article. [01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:54.000] The article can give you the full details of a read it carefully and you'll come to understand what it means. [01:37:54.000 --> 01:37:58.000] The fact is that they are not the same while they may have similarities. [01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:05.000] And while they may be used similarly in some cases, they are not the same thing for every purpose. [01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:08.000] Okay. [01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:11.000] Okay. [01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000] Okay. [01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:13.000] All right, that's cool. [01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:23.000] And every state has a clause in its law that makes it very clear that where a law does not define a term or phrase and the term or phrase is being used as a term of art. [01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:34.000] Then the term of art must be given its common meaning by those who are engaged in the profession, occupation, or art to which the term applies. [01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:36.000] Okay. [01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:40.000] And so, or other law, uh, if other law defines it. [01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:42.000] And in this case, other law has defined it. [01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:51.000] That article is full of case law, United States Supreme Court case law that says what the differences are. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000] Okay, yeah, I'm definitely going to check that out. [01:38:53.000 --> 01:39:04.000] Because I was thinking like a bit, I'm like, because I was like, if that could invalidate the criminal law the same way how it would invalidate the transportation law, the transportation code. [01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:19.000] If that specific law is directed at a resident and resident is not defined as someone permanently domiciled within the state to make it more in line with domiciled in resident, that's correct. [01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:22.000] Oh, okay, okay, okay, okay. [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:23.000] All right, cool. [01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:29.000] I just wanted to know your thoughts on it because I was just definitely thinking like, why would it apply for transportation and not apply for the criminal law? [01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:30.000] You feel me? [01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.000] That's the subject matter that they're going on for. [01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:38.000] Well, like I said, unless they change the definition of the term within the law itself, it does. [01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:47.000] It doesn't automatically change from one set of laws to the other unless the law itself creates a definition for it locally. [01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:50.000] Oh, okay, okay, okay. [01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:55.000] Yeah, because I was thinking I'm like, if you're not a resident that you wouldn't qualify for transportation anyway. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:07.000] I can tell by this conversation you need to read a lot more of those articles on my blog because I go into a lot of this stuff including not only the resident stuff but how to actually read a statute and understand it. [01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:15.000] And it goes into all the things and breaks down how the state law says the terms must be interpreted, et cetera, et cetera. [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:22.000] All right, do some thorough reading on there because there's lots of good information up there and it's all verifiable stuff. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:28.000] Okay, one thing I'll do, I'll just call back next Monday and see if I'm on the right path. [01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:32.000] I'm definitely about to go through your blog and check out everything for real. [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:33.000] Okay. [01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:34.000] And I'm sure I got a good grasp on it. [01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:35.000] All right, good luck, man. [01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:36.000] I appreciate everything you do. [01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:38.000] Yes, sir, thank you. [01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:39.000] All right, see you. [01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:41.000] All right, bye-bye. [01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:49.000] All right, let's see, Adam in Texas is still, Adam, you still there? [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:53.000] Oh, yeah, crap, man. [01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:55.000] Sorry, I forgot I was still on there. [01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:56.000] That's okay. [01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:58.000] I was just wondering if you'd call back in. [01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:02.000] I didn't notice if you'd dropped off or not, so I was just checking. [01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:05.000] No, I didn't drop off, but if you've got other callers, take them. [01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:06.000] It's not, man. [01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:08.000] Okay, yeah, I've got some more up here. [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:11.000] I was just trying to see if you'd call back in for something real quick. [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:12.000] All right, thanks. [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:14.000] No, my bad. [01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:17.000] All right, now we have Eric in California. [01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000] Eric, what do you got? [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:26.000] Hey, Eddie, I got stopped for a cell phone violation last week and was going through [01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:34.000] your script and vote my right to remain silent and the officer, of course, goes into wanting [01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:39.000] to arrest me, tow the car, and then I have my kids in the back seat, so then he's talking [01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:42.000] about taking them too. [01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:50.000] So in the recording, I've got him threatening, you know, the punishment for invoking my right. [01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:56.000] I ended up giving him the paperwork just to get the traffic stop over with. [01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:00.000] So I figure I could fight it some other ways. [01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:07.000] That's an unlawful seizure on its own, but is there anything that you would recommend [01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:12.000] when you're traveling with your kids and the cops are, you know, getting aggressive? [01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:18.000] Yeah, don't be doing things they'll stop you for. [01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:20.000] That's the best advice I can give you. [01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:24.000] If you're worried about how you're going to handle things, if you've got kids in the car [01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:28.000] or strangers in the car or anybody else in the car, then don't be doing anything that [01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:33.000] will get you pulled over one way or the other. [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:37.000] Yeah, that was my fault. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:46.000] Is there anything I can do, any recourse with a cop once he started threatening to arrest me [01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:49.000] and tow my car and take my kids for invoking my right? [01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:50.000] But I did wave them. [01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:57.000] Did you object to having to produce any information other than your name, address, and date of birth? [01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:01.000] He wouldn't take it. [01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:04.000] That's not what I asked you. [01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:06.000] I objected. [01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:13.000] I told him I wasn't going to give him those documents because they could be used against me. [01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:19.000] Does California have a physical production element in the statute? [01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:22.000] Yes, in the vehicle code. [01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:23.000] No. [01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:26.000] Read it very carefully. [01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:28.000] Okay? [01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:29.000] Okay. [01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:36.000] The statute cannot compel you to wave a right against self-incrimination, no matter what it says. [01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:46.000] But when it says ID, does it require a physical production or does it require verbal production [01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000] of three pieces or two pieces of information, whatever? [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:52.000] Hang on just a second. [01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:55.000] Let me take this break and then we'll let you answer that. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:57.000] All right, folks, we'll be right back. [01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:26.000] Y'all hang in there. [01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:29.000] Thank you. [01:44:57.000 --> 01:44:59.000] And increase your income. [01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Order now. [01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:31.000] Thank you. [01:45:59.000 --> 01:46:15.000] Law Easy. [01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:17.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:46:17.000 --> 01:46:20.000] We are now in the last segment of the Rule of Law radio show. [01:46:20.000 --> 01:46:23.000] And I am currently talking to Eric in California. [01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:25.000] All right, Eric, go ahead. [01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:31.000] Okay, yeah, I just read the statute. It says it's a failure to produce a driver's license. [01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:35.000] Did he ask for a driver's license or did he ask for ID? [01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:39.000] He asked. As far as I recall, it was a driver's license. [01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:43.000] Okay. And the statute says you're required to produce it? [01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:44.000] Correct. [01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:51.000] Does the statute contain any provision that says, except for where it may be violated of a Fifth Amendment protection? [01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:53.000] No, not at all. [01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:58.000] Then the statute can't violate the Fifth Amendment protection, right? [01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:00.000] Okay. [01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:03.000] Now, here's the one problem. [01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:09.000] Is what he was charging you with a civil infraction or a criminal offense? [01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:15.000] He was charging me with a civil infraction to cellphone violation. [01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:20.000] Which is punitive, right? [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000] Yeah, monetarily. [01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:32.000] Therefore, they still cannot force you to waive your Fifth Amendment right, Fourth and Fifth Amendment right. [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:34.000] Okay? [01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:38.000] Got it. [01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:40.000] Yeah, in the future, I'll handle it differently. [01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:42.000] This is hard with kids in the car. [01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:48.000] No, I understand the mindset, but that's something you've got to be aware of. [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:53.000] If you're worried about what the consequences are for standing in your ground when someone else is in the car, [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:58.000] then don't do things that make it necessary to stand your ground when someone else is in the car. [01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:00.000] Gotcha. [01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:05.000] Yeah, I learned my lesson. [01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:07.000] Motion of lemony to suppress the testimony. [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:09.000] Motion in lemony. [01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:12.000] Motion in lemony, okay. [01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:19.000] I heard you talk before about just limiting the witness's testimony to personal firsthand knowledge. [01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:22.000] You're right. [01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:29.000] And when you ask him to, what is it, go over the definition, like driving and operating, [01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:34.000] and he doesn't know that, then that's where you would object to him giving any testimony. [01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:38.000] If he's going to use those terms to describe the offense, absolutely. [01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:43.000] How can he testify you're driving a motor vehicle if he doesn't know what motor vehicle means? [01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000] Hey, that's not a fact within his personal knowledge. [01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:50.000] Therefore, it cannot be a fact in his testimony. [01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:57.000] And at that point, I would ask for a verdict in my favor. [01:48:57.000 --> 01:48:58.000] Not necessarily. [01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:00.000] It depends. [01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:05.000] You wait and see what the prosecutor's going to try to do, but you need to be objecting every time they try. [01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:07.000] There's no prosecutor out here. [01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:12.000] I don't know, but you still need to object to whatever the officer says one way or the other. [01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:16.000] Okay. [01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:19.000] Oh, another question about jury duty out here. [01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:28.000] So I've done, I've written to the head of the juror services here for the various counties I've had jury duty in, [01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:32.000] and they do ask for residence, and it does say when they define it. [01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:39.000] If you read the article on my blog dealing with exactly that in the state of Texas, you'll see why that could be a problem. [01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:45.000] Because that means everyone but Texas people can serve on the jury. [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:46.000] Correct. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:50.000] So if you were a defendant and you wanted a jury trial, there's two things. [01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:54.000] One is you can't get a jury of your peers because they're a resident. [01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:57.000] Number two, they're also 14th Amendment citizens. [01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:01.000] The 14th Amendment doesn't have Jack squat to do with this. [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:04.000] Get off that horse before it throws you. [01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:06.000] I'm telling you now. [01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:09.000] Okay. [01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:12.000] I've used it, but anyways. [01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:15.000] You've used it, but what did it get you? [01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:20.000] Oh, I got it in jury duty using it. [01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:21.000] Okay. [01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:24.000] Well, there's a reason for that, and it's not the one you think it is. [01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:29.000] Most people don't argumentative crazy people on their jury. [01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:38.000] They would have disqualified you just out of cause for that alone. [01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:43.000] But when they're asking for 14th Amendment citizens or residents and you're the defendant. [01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:44.000] Okay. [01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:46.000] That's a presumption on your part. [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:49.000] A resident, anyway, doesn't matter. [01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:55.000] A resident is different than someone permanently domiciled, which I've discussed this whole show one way or the other. [01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:56.000] Okay. [01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:04.000] And the article on my blog that deals with Texas juries goes into this in very specific detail on exactly that same issue. [01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:06.000] It's exactly what the article's about. [01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:18.000] Texas juries and how they only allow residents and not those who are domiciled to participate according to the letter of the law. [01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:20.000] So I suggest you read that. [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:25.000] It'll give you more information and I'm going to be able to in the next seven minutes. [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:26.000] Okay. [01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:27.000] No, I read it a couple of times. [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:28.000] Yeah. [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:29.000] I'm well aware of what it says. [01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:30.000] Okay. [01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:31.000] Then you understand where the concepts are. [01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:34.000] I didn't mention 14th Amendment citizen in there anywhere, did I? [01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:35.000] No. [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:36.000] That's Dave Champion. [01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:37.000] That's something else. [01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:44.000] But back to the jury not being of your peers, can you object to that jury? [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:45.000] Sure. [01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:54.000] If you could make a valid argument against residency, you would have to argue that the jury pool was formed unconstitutionally. [01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:58.000] Your peers were not allowed to participate in your jury. [01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:08.000] You were not allowed to get people who are permanently domiciled within the state of California and who are familiar with California and the way they need to be in order to serve on your jury. [01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:12.000] They only allowed residents. [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:14.000] Okay. [01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:32.000] But you would have to challenge the statute forming a jury pool as being unconstitutional and thus incapable of giving you a fair and impartial trial with it by a jury of your peers. [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:35.000] Okay. [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:36.000] All right. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:43.000] Any other tips for besides the motion and lemony to suppress the cop testimony out here? [01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:50.000] Well, again, if the cop attempts, they're going to let him do it anyway because they're most likely going to deny your motion. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:57.000] And then you need to jump right on the cop every time he says something that requires a legal definition from the statute in order to be true. [01:52:57.000 --> 01:53:05.000] Immediately object, I wish to cross-examine the witness on Wadiar for personal knowledge and ask him those questions. [01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:08.000] Can you give me the legal definition of blah, blah, blah? [01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:16.000] And when he can't do it, then I object to this witness testifying that that's a fact in this case because they don't know what it means. [01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:30.000] How can they say it's a fact if they don't know what it means? [01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:31.000] Okay. [01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:32.000] Good enough? [01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:33.000] Good enough. [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:34.000] Thank you. [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:35.000] You're welcome. [01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:37.000] Thanks for calling. [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:38.000] All right. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:39.000] Now, let's see. [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:43.000] I've got five minutes left here and Truth Raider is up next. [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:45.000] Truth Raider, what do you got? [01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:47.000] Couple questions for you, Eddie. [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000] Okay. [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000] What? [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:50.000] Remember that by me one more time? [01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:55.000] You were talking about Interstate Commerce versus Brimson. [01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:58.000] Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson. [01:53:58.000 --> 01:53:59.000] Okay. [01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:01.000] I was trying to look that up. [01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:02.000] I couldn't find it. [01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:08.000] Okay. Now, would you agree with me in this that God is the writer of all moral common law? [01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:09.000] No. [01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:11.000] Our fundamental, no. [01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:17.000] I have yet to see a law that God himself wrote anywhere except maybe for the tablets and I've never seen those. [01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:18.000] All right. [01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:22.000] But he provided us our fundamentally protected rights. [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:26.000] Our rights are granted by our Creator. [01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:27.000] Right. [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:34.000] Now, what do you think that God's position on this on all this betrayal of our rights by [01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:41.000] these people that are put in government supposed to be using the moral common law? [01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:47.000] Again, Raider, I don't know what you're calling the moral common law. [01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:49.000] Well, simple. [01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:54.000] The moral common law, you don't beat, you don't cheat, you don't steal, you don't rob. [01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:59.000] Well, you just invalidated to have the existence of government officials. [01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:00.000] Yeah. [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:01.000] They don't like competition. [01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:04.000] Yeah, I know. [01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:05.000] All right. [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:06.000] Fair enough. [01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:10.000] You're asking somebody to enforce something they don't understand and much less have any [01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:12.000] experience with. [01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:17.000] So how do you expect that to work? [01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:19.000] It's supposed to because they take an oath. [01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:20.000] It's really supposed to take an oath. [01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:24.000] It's a completely different deal of chimpanzee can take an oath through sign language. [01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:27.000] Doesn't mean he understands what he's signing. [01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:29.000] Yeah, you have a point there. [01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:32.000] I just wonder what you think God would feel about all this betrayal. [01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:33.000] I don't know. [01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:36.000] He hasn't reached down and given whispered by here to tell me what he thinks about it. [01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:43.000] I know what I think about it and I base what I think about it upon what I know to be right and wrong. [01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:44.000] Good enough. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:45.000] All right. [01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:46.000] I'm going to go to work. [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:53.000] Now, one other question, what is the U.S. title code that was mentioned there earlier? [01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:54.000] 49. [01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:55.000] 49. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:56.000] Okay. [01:55:56.000 --> 01:55:58.000] And that's it. [01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:00.000] Is USC 49? [01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:04.000] Title 49 of the United States Code. [01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:05.000] Okay. [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:08.000] Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act. [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:11.000] There's a lot of information that I'm trying to get on Google Earth. [01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:13.000] It's just not giving it to me. [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:17.000] How would you go on Google Earth to find something out about law? [01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:20.000] Google Scholar, I mean, I'm just taking, sorry. [01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:22.000] Google Scholar is for case law. [01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:25.000] It's not for law. [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:26.000] Case law. [01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:27.000] Okay. [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:32.000] So I could find that interstate commerce commission versus bremsen there. [01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:33.000] Yeah. [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:34.000] Okay. [01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:35.000] I'm going to take a look at that. [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:36.000] All right. [01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:37.000] That's all I got for tonight. [01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:38.000] Time goes up to the show. [01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:39.000] Yes, sir. [01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:40.000] And God bless. [01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:41.000] Thanks. [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:42.000] All right. [01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:47.000] I've got two minutes here and not enough time to get another caller in. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:50.000] So the rest of the guys on the board, I'm sorry, I'm not going to be able to get to you. [01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:54.000] I'm going to be out of time for when you can get started on your question here. [01:56:54.000 --> 01:57:02.000] But once again, before I sign off for this Monday night, I would like to ask, please keep us in your financial means. [01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:07.000] However you have to do that, however you can do that, every little bit helps. [01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:13.000] We are the network itself is didn't even make the funds that needed to for last year. [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:16.000] If we don't make it this year, there ain't going to be a next year. [01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:18.000] It's that simple folks. [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:20.000] It's really that simple. [01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:27.000] I personally am sitting here on absolutely zero dollars in no sense have been that way for weeks. [01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:30.000] Usually will remain that way for weeks. [01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:47.000] We don't do anything but work on this stuff to bring this information to you and whatever other things we can do in between those periods to support ourselves because this is a very time consuming thing to do and get right. [01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:52.000] We need you guys to understand that this takes a lot to do correctly. [01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:56.000] This is why attorneys and judges don't do it correctly. [01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:59.000] They're too busy playing golf and whatever else they do. [01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:01.000] But it sure isn't studying law. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:05.000] Not the actual law anyway. [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:07.000] That's what we do here. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:20.000] That's where we spend our hours, our days, our weeks, our months putting together information in a way that we can bring it to you, educate you and help you. [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:26.000] Please help us continue to do that for the benefit of everybody. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:32.000] We really need your financial support individually and as a network. [01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:35.000] I want to thank everyone for listening and everyone who called. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:37.000] I greatly appreciate it. [01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:38.000] We all do. [01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:40.000] I want to thank you so much. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.000] Y'all all have a great week. [01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:44.000] Good night and God bless. [01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:58.000] Bible for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000] The New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:02.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.