[00:00.000 --> 00:05.780]  The following, these flashes brought to you by the Low Star Lowdown, providing your deli
[00:05.780 --> 00:13.420]  bulletins for the commodity market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.420 --> 00:21.260]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.260 --> 00:27.660]  Markets for Waze the 6th of February, 2019, open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce, silver
[00:27.660 --> 00:36.680]  $15.77 an ounce, copper $2.83 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $3.66 a barrel, brand crude $61.98
[00:36.680 --> 00:43.380]  an ounce, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple
[00:43.380 --> 00:50.720]  XRP $0.29, Ethereum $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[00:50.720 --> 00:59.620]  Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[00:59.620 --> 01:04.540]  qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.540 --> 01:05.980]  was passed by Parliament.
[01:05.980 --> 01:13.620]  Today in History, in recent news, several Texas-based organizations filed a lawsuit today requesting
[01:13.620 --> 01:18.460]  that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally
[01:18.460 --> 01:19.820]  registered to vote.
[01:19.820 --> 01:24.620]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:24.620 --> 01:29.980]  of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:29.980 --> 01:33.340]  who were registered to vote when obtaining major arbitralizations.
[01:33.340 --> 01:37.060]  Over half of the 95,000 didn't indeed vote, it seems.
[01:37.060 --> 01:41.060]  However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:41.060 --> 01:45.340]  not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:45.340 --> 01:50.900]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:50.900 --> 01:55.260]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:55.260 --> 01:57.140]  with proof of eligibility.
[01:57.140 --> 02:01.260]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[02:01.260 --> 02:09.020]  yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[02:09.020 --> 02:14.420]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck after
[02:14.420 --> 02:16.860]  a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[02:16.860 --> 02:20.660]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[02:20.660 --> 02:24.260]  An x-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[02:24.260 --> 02:30.460]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ, has refused to comment.
[02:30.460 --> 02:35.260]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristin Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[02:35.260 --> 02:40.180]  Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[02:40.180 --> 02:44.620]  Conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February
[02:44.620 --> 02:47.460]  14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:47.460 --> 02:51.460]  You can find the interview at kiiitv.com.
[02:51.460 --> 03:19.460]  This is Rick Brody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[03:19.460 --> 03:49.420]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, root of law radio on this, the 8th day of the 8th
[03:49.420 --> 03:57.540]  day of February 2018, the Friday, the 8th day of February 2018.
[03:57.540 --> 04:01.940]  We are doing our four hour info marathon.
[04:01.940 --> 04:10.220]  I have the, I'm turning the phones on now, if you have a question or a comment, give
[04:10.220 --> 04:15.900]  us a call, 512-646-1984.
[04:15.900 --> 04:22.380]  I'll start with an update on the electronic lawyer project.
[04:22.380 --> 04:31.140]  We are working toward getting the project funded, although I've worked on it a long
[04:31.140 --> 04:33.620]  time and put a massive amount of work into it.
[04:33.620 --> 04:38.620]  It is a extremely large project.
[04:38.620 --> 04:47.580]  It has the potential of completely changing the way lawyers do law.
[04:47.580 --> 04:53.340]  Some of the things, when you start a project, you almost never know what it's going to look
[04:53.340 --> 04:57.060]  like when you get done.
[04:57.060 --> 05:03.060]  This one, it started as one thing and it morphed into several others and it has reached a level
[05:03.060 --> 05:08.500]  of sophistication that surprises even me and I created the thing.
[05:08.500 --> 05:16.500]  So, we're putting together some final touches so that we can start producing some serious
[05:16.500 --> 05:18.740]  funding and get this thing launched.
[05:18.740 --> 05:24.540]  I've got a whole board full of callers already, so I won't spend too much time with this.
[05:24.540 --> 05:28.900]  I'll go ahead and go to the callers and we're going to start with Scott in Texas.
[05:28.900 --> 05:29.900]  Hello, Scott.
[05:29.900 --> 05:33.460]  Well, howdy, howdy, how you been?
[05:33.460 --> 05:34.460]  I've been good.
[05:34.460 --> 05:36.460]  Where have you been?
[05:36.460 --> 05:43.860]  I've been busy with my business getting my agency off the ground, so I'm in all kinds
[05:43.860 --> 05:49.820]  of health care, all the way in the mortgage insurance, everything in Texas and now licensed
[05:49.820 --> 05:52.820]  in Colorado and California.
[05:52.820 --> 05:57.380]  So, wow, you're an insurance salesman, huh?
[05:57.380 --> 06:03.820]  Well, Medicare is what I've been doing for five years on the side while battling all
[06:03.820 --> 06:15.820]  the public corruption and learn quite a bit along the way because some of the actual continuing
[06:15.820 --> 06:23.820]  education that I had to do, there was certain topics that were actually in law and I would
[06:23.820 --> 06:27.700]  say, well, which one do you want?
[06:27.700 --> 06:32.020]  They rattled off a couple of the topics and mentioned more about law and I said, law and
[06:32.020 --> 06:35.900]  they said, yeah, nobody takes that and I said, well, that's the one I want and nobody wants
[06:35.900 --> 06:45.620]  it, I'll find out what's going on and that's where I actually discovered vicarious liability
[06:45.620 --> 06:52.340]  and so that's what kind of pieced a lot of this stuff together but moving on, there's
[06:52.340 --> 06:59.860]  been some major chatter that's been going all over YouTube, American intelligence media
[06:59.860 --> 07:06.620]  has done, they do a lot of really good deep research and stuff and I don't know if you're
[07:06.620 --> 07:16.780]  aware about 18USD code 1001, Statements for Entry General, you never really checked that
[07:16.780 --> 07:17.780]  into that.
[07:17.780 --> 07:20.940]  Okay, okay, say that again, 18USD code?
[07:20.940 --> 07:34.300]  18USD code 1001, Statements or Entries Generally and in this, in the first section in section
[07:34.300 --> 07:39.460]  A, it talks about everybody making a false statement, you know, that's where you get
[07:39.460 --> 07:47.100]  criminally prosecuted but when you go to subsection B, it just says, their intelligence, it doesn't
[07:47.100 --> 07:56.140]  apply to anything and it's great, it gives the Congress and everybody the legal liability
[07:56.140 --> 08:01.580]  to lie and I'll read it for you, subsection B, well, I can read the whole thing because
[08:01.580 --> 08:07.420]  it's pretty short, section A, except it's otherwise provided in this section, whoever
[08:07.420 --> 08:12.460]  in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branching
[08:12.460 --> 08:17.460]  government of the United States, knowingly and willfully, one, false, false, conceals
[08:17.460 --> 08:23.940]  or covers up by any trick, scheme or device of material fact, two, makes a materially
[08:23.940 --> 08:31.900]  false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation or three, makes or uses
[08:31.900 --> 08:38.140]  any false writings or documents knowing this thing to conceal any material, false, fictitious
[08:38.140 --> 08:43.980]  or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than five years, blah, blah,
[08:43.980 --> 08:46.060]  blah, blah, subsection B.
[08:46.060 --> 08:50.340]  Wait a minute, five years, that makes you a felony.
[08:50.340 --> 08:56.380]  Oh yeah, involved in domestic terrorism, blah, blah, blah, right, and so here goes
[08:56.380 --> 09:06.060]  the subsection B, subsection A does not apply to a party, to a judicial proceeding or that
[09:06.060 --> 09:13.900]  party's counsel or statement, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party
[09:13.900 --> 09:21.380]  or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
[09:21.380 --> 09:26.300]  So it specifically says that you can commit aggravated perjury in court in the federal
[09:26.300 --> 09:27.300]  courts.
[09:27.300 --> 09:31.820]  There you go.
[09:31.820 --> 09:33.820]  That needs to be challenged.
[09:33.820 --> 09:42.580]  Wait, wait, wait, let me finish and there's been appeals cases heard on this and the appellate
[09:42.580 --> 09:50.460]  courts upheld subsection B saying that the legislators were very queer in writing this
[09:50.460 --> 09:56.700]  and they have the absolute ability to lie and get away with it and not be held to any
[09:56.700 --> 09:57.700]  liability.
[09:57.700 --> 10:03.180]  Yes, it's already been discovered it's been upheld in appeals court.
[10:03.180 --> 10:08.940]  This is why you can't, these people are getting away with lying to everybody and they don't
[10:08.940 --> 10:15.860]  get prosecuted, they wrote it in there.
[10:15.860 --> 10:22.260]  We need to figure out how to address that, that needs to be addressed by legislation.
[10:22.260 --> 10:26.020]  Some lawyers paid a lot of money to get that passed.
[10:26.020 --> 10:32.900]  That's the subsection B where nobody reads, it's the same how they charge everybody, they
[10:32.900 --> 10:40.220]  only read half the section with a selective prostitution, that's exactly the bull down
[10:40.220 --> 10:47.060]  on there and they can use it to get away with it and they can use it to protect themselves.
[10:47.060 --> 10:52.420]  This should be blowing up everywhere.
[10:52.420 --> 10:59.260]  That's a constitutional violation because it denies due process on its face.
[10:59.260 --> 11:09.100]  It doesn't even hold even the semblance of reasonable and prudent.
[11:09.100 --> 11:15.740]  I mean come on, when I saw this and this is only about a week old and you know it's like
[11:15.740 --> 11:20.060]  holy crap you've got to be kidding me.
[11:20.060 --> 11:25.420]  They wrote it in their in plain sight.
[11:25.420 --> 11:32.420]  So it definitely needs a serious constitutional challenge.
[11:32.420 --> 11:39.380]  Now we've got to find a really politically charged place to use it.
[11:39.380 --> 11:44.740]  Well help, you know anybody can just go in the court and lie and if they want to get
[11:44.740 --> 11:52.580]  prosecuted, oh no let me break out US 18 USC 1001 subsection B and shove it in their face.
[11:52.580 --> 11:56.020]  This is all laws.
[11:56.020 --> 11:58.740]  I didn't write it, I just read it.
[11:58.740 --> 12:00.540]  I've heard that before.
[12:00.540 --> 12:04.340]  Oh it kind of got a little catchy.
[12:04.340 --> 12:13.780]  So don't blame me, okay that is entry, I don't have to pull that out and look at some of
[12:13.780 --> 12:16.780]  the case law.
[12:16.780 --> 12:22.060]  That means that I can go into the federal court and lie to the federal court with absolute
[12:22.060 --> 12:25.140]  impunity.
[12:25.140 --> 12:32.660]  Everybody can, well I just don't know if I could even take it and go in the court and
[12:32.660 --> 12:37.980]  lie to everybody just fall face, lie straight up even though he has never been in the law.
[12:37.980 --> 12:43.380]  Most people don't have nothing to lie about, it's the public officials that have everything
[12:43.380 --> 12:50.460]  to lie about and they can just hide under 18 USC 1001 subsection B.
[12:50.460 --> 12:57.100]  But that doesn't get them past 18 U.S. Code 242.
[12:57.100 --> 13:05.140]  If the effect of their lying denies me and the full free access to or enjoy my right,
[13:05.140 --> 13:10.420]  I think we can still trap them under 18 U.S. Code 242.
[13:10.420 --> 13:17.220]  Well when they have the ability to lie right there and you got these crooked judges that
[13:17.220 --> 13:23.780]  are upholding it and saying hey it's right there, what, the judges are right, if that's
[13:23.780 --> 13:26.580]  what it says, that's what it says.
[13:26.580 --> 13:36.580]  So you can't charge them with perjury but you can charge them with official misconduct.
[13:36.580 --> 13:40.340]  It's not a felony, it's a misdemeanor but it's high enough misdemeanor.
[13:40.340 --> 13:44.500]  But isn't that just outright shocking?
[13:44.500 --> 13:54.740]  I mean, yes, that we have written into the code an exclusion from aggravated perjury.
[13:54.740 --> 14:01.700]  That only certain people knew about and we're using that defense because they knew about
[14:01.700 --> 14:04.380]  it and nobody else did.
[14:04.380 --> 14:08.820]  So nobody should be able to be charged for perjury ever again.
[14:08.820 --> 14:11.140]  In a federal court.
[14:11.140 --> 14:13.980]  That's true.
[14:13.980 --> 14:17.660]  So we'd need to adjust our strategy.
[14:17.660 --> 14:22.340]  Well, if you had a state case and you just move it to state court and say hey, well yeah,
[14:22.340 --> 14:30.420]  I lied but you know, this was the federal court now, you know, it's legal to lie.
[14:30.420 --> 14:34.020]  That is an interesting question.
[14:34.020 --> 14:43.580]  If the person is in a federal court, the federal court is in a state and even if the federal
[14:43.580 --> 14:53.140]  court can't prosecute him, state court can because he is the actor is in this state,
[14:53.140 --> 14:54.860]  whichever state is in.
[14:54.860 --> 14:59.380]  The federal courthouse is not a federal enclave.
[14:59.380 --> 15:08.020]  So he stands subject to the common law of the state, i.e. criminal code and the criminal
[15:08.020 --> 15:18.980]  code of the state makes it a felony to commit aggravated perjury even if the state doesn't.
[15:18.980 --> 15:24.700]  He can really go after the fed and the state and the state and the fed.
[15:24.700 --> 15:32.300]  So maybe we should file aggravated perjury charges against the actor in a state grand
[15:32.300 --> 15:33.300]  jury.
[15:33.300 --> 15:38.620]  I just had someone notice me that they received a letter from the Tarrant County Grand Jury
[15:38.620 --> 15:40.420]  over criminal charges.
[15:40.420 --> 15:47.020]  They had filed, she sent me a, and she texted me, said she got a letter from the grand jury
[15:47.020 --> 15:50.060]  but she didn't tell me what it was.
[15:50.060 --> 15:54.820]  I bet it's going to say that they're going to take no action.
[15:54.820 --> 15:59.940]  Oh, I already did that three years ago with the Tarrant County Grand Jury and they said
[15:59.940 --> 16:07.500]  they weren't going to do anything about it and so I sent a criminal complaint against
[16:07.500 --> 16:11.860]  that Foreman of the Grand Jury to your buddy over there in Wise County.
[16:11.860 --> 16:17.260]  The Foreman did sign it but never heard another thing about it.
[16:17.260 --> 16:21.740]  Then you need to file criminal charges against the Foreman of the Grand Jury.
[16:21.740 --> 16:26.820]  Well, they can just no bill it and that's where we're talking about.
[16:26.820 --> 16:30.380]  Let him prove that he no billed it.
[16:30.380 --> 16:34.220]  Since you have no evidence that it was ever heard by the Grand Jury, you have reason to
[16:34.220 --> 16:39.700]  believe that the Foreman secreted it from the Grand Jury and filed against the Foreman
[16:39.700 --> 16:47.860]  and let the Foreman come to court and show that he, that the Grand Jury examined into
[16:47.860 --> 16:54.180]  the accusation.
[16:54.180 --> 16:57.780]  You went after the Foreman beat great strategy.
[16:57.780 --> 17:01.580]  That will make him crazy.
[17:01.580 --> 17:04.380]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[17:04.380 --> 17:07.940]  In today's America we live in a us against them society and if we the people are ever
[17:07.940 --> 17:12.020]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:12.020 --> 17:15.340]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[17:15.340 --> 17:19.380]  in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[17:19.380 --> 17:23.220]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[17:23.220 --> 17:25.100]  our rights through due process.
[17:25.100 --> 17:28.580]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the
[17:28.580 --> 17:32.340]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[17:32.340 --> 17:34.740]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.740 --> 17:38.740]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[17:38.740 --> 17:40.100]  ordering your copy today.
[17:40.100 --> 17:43.340]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code,
[17:43.340 --> 17:47.820]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of your original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[17:47.820 --> 17:50.140]  documents and other useful resource material.
[17:50.140 --> 17:54.140]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[17:54.140 --> 18:00.700]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.700 --> 18:06.020]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:06.020 --> 18:09.540]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[18:09.540 --> 18:13.860]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.860 --> 18:14.860]  can win two.
[18:14.860 --> 18:19.660]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.660 --> 18:25.380]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.380 --> 18:30.020]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:30.020 --> 18:34.220]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.220 --> 18:39.340]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.340 --> 18:41.460]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.460 --> 18:47.020]  For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:47.020 --> 18:49.900]  or email Michael Mearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.900 --> 18:57.700]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.700 --> 19:17.220]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:17.220 --> 19:29.900]  Radio Network.
[19:29.900 --> 19:31.380]  Okay we are back.
[19:31.380 --> 19:41.580]  Randy Kelton, rule of radio on this Friday the 8th day of February 2019 and we're talking
[19:41.580 --> 19:45.020]  to Scott in Texas.
[19:45.020 --> 19:53.180]  Okay Scott, what are you going to do to ensure that this law is not enforced in a way that
[19:53.180 --> 19:56.380]  denies a citizen pool in due process?
[19:56.380 --> 20:00.380]  What am I going to do?
[20:00.380 --> 20:05.900]  Well dang, I've done quite a bit.
[20:05.900 --> 20:11.780]  I've been pounding away at these people for so long I had to take a break for a while.
[20:11.780 --> 20:22.060]  It was just man, it was overwhelming but all I did was send that in over to that grand jury
[20:22.060 --> 20:24.580]  and let them kind of flop around on it.
[20:24.580 --> 20:31.140]  I knew they weren't going to do anything and it was mainly just a setup anyway because
[20:31.140 --> 20:36.500]  knowing that none of these people are going to go after, you know, and this is what I
[20:36.500 --> 20:41.700]  was talking about going after the insurance carriers because I'm really starting to really
[20:41.700 --> 20:49.300]  drill down into, since the public officials are all, you know, they'll cover each other's
[20:49.300 --> 20:55.100]  butt because it's a fraternity, but you start going after these insurance companies and
[20:55.100 --> 21:03.540]  we start suing them for allowing these practices to occur in violation of their own policies
[21:03.540 --> 21:08.540]  and procedures, now we're getting into fraud, waste and abuse.
[21:08.540 --> 21:11.940]  Okay, you're in that area.
[21:11.940 --> 21:12.940]  I know.
[21:12.940 --> 21:20.300]  Tell me, how do I originate a claim against the insurance carrier?
[21:20.300 --> 21:28.900]  Well, that's what the drilling down into is discovering the fraud, waste and abuse and
[21:28.900 --> 21:36.260]  these are legal terms in insurance that are, you have to take, we take a lot of testing
[21:36.260 --> 21:46.020]  on those specific topics and basically once you can discover kickbacks and, you know,
[21:46.020 --> 21:53.940]  procedures that are being willfully violated, you know, now it's going into, you know, the
[21:53.940 --> 21:58.460]  fraud part and the waste, you know, just the...
[21:58.460 --> 22:00.180]  Wait, wait, wait, hold on.
[22:00.180 --> 22:08.580]  When you say fraud, are you speaking in the context of the insurance company seeking out
[22:08.580 --> 22:17.740]  fraud that would indemnify them from having to pay a claim or are you looking at fraud
[22:17.740 --> 22:24.980]  from the perspective of the insurance company itself in trying to avoid a proper claim?
[22:24.980 --> 22:36.740]  No, what it is, is the fraud is basically that the insurance is actually almost prosecuting,
[22:36.740 --> 22:44.020]  you know, discovering like the doctor committed fraud by filing these fraudulent paperwork
[22:44.020 --> 22:45.620]  with Medicare.
[22:45.620 --> 22:52.780]  Now this doctor, you know, made tons and tons of money by billing Medicare improperly,
[22:52.780 --> 23:01.260]  fraudulently, well, you know, now they basically, people went after the doctor and subsequently
[23:01.260 --> 23:08.980]  the insurance company has to pay, so now the insurance company is kind of prosecuting it.
[23:08.980 --> 23:18.180]  I'm not sure exactly how to get it figured out yet, but there's a way where the holding
[23:18.180 --> 23:25.540]  the insurance company liable for allowing the fraud, waste and abuse, if we can connect
[23:25.540 --> 23:31.340]  those dots like that, now we put the insurance companies on the dime and they're going to
[23:31.340 --> 23:34.540]  have to be the one, because who polices the police?
[23:34.540 --> 23:41.020]  Well, it's going to have to be the insurance company, so they're writing to action.
[23:41.020 --> 23:52.860]  Okay, if fraud is occurring and the insurance company is subject to be liable for that fraud,
[23:52.860 --> 24:02.820]  how is it, what measures does the insurance companies have that they can take to interrupt
[24:02.820 --> 24:03.820]  this fraud?
[24:03.820 --> 24:07.580]  How can we use the insurance companies to our benefit?
[24:07.580 --> 24:13.500]  Well, number one, if they start canceling policies or raising the rates through the
[24:13.500 --> 24:21.660]  roof, that's going to have to change procedures there, because, you know, the basic...
[24:21.660 --> 24:27.180]  Well, what I was hoping that in your training you would get some glimpse of how the insurance
[24:27.180 --> 24:32.020]  company plans to deal with these issues.
[24:32.020 --> 24:37.540]  If we know what their strategies are, then we know how to play to their strategies.
[24:37.540 --> 24:45.140]  I don't know that yet, so I'm still trying to figure out, you know, a lot of the ins and
[24:45.140 --> 24:48.140]  outs, it's a little bit new stuff.
[24:48.140 --> 24:55.740]  Okay, next question, what does waste mean in this regard?
[24:55.740 --> 25:06.420]  Waste is just, you know, they're wasting money, say, like you have dispensed...
[25:06.420 --> 25:12.980]  You have like five milligrams of some ointment, and you only dispense one milligram, and then
[25:12.980 --> 25:18.140]  you throw the other four out, then you go grab another fresh tube for another person,
[25:18.140 --> 25:21.220]  and you're billing them for the whole five, you know, and so...
[25:21.220 --> 25:25.140]  Okay, this is primarily Medicare.
[25:25.140 --> 25:31.660]  Because Medicare is the one that's producing the product for them, or paying for the product.
[25:31.660 --> 25:32.660]  Exactly.
[25:32.660 --> 25:39.220]  Okay, okay, now that makes sense, that they're not using the product efficiently, so it's
[25:39.220 --> 25:41.740]  costing the insurance company more money.
[25:41.740 --> 25:44.300]  Okay, what about abuse?
[25:44.300 --> 25:50.060]  What does abuse mean in the insurance context?
[25:50.060 --> 25:55.860]  As opposed to fraud, how is abuse different than fraud?
[25:55.860 --> 26:04.140]  And it's funny because they're really so similar, it's not even funny, but abuse, I'm trying
[26:04.140 --> 26:11.540]  to think of a good qualifying example without having to pull up notes and stuff, but it's
[26:11.540 --> 26:18.100]  just like, I don't want to steer everybody wrong, I'd have to get back to you on that.
[26:18.100 --> 26:23.660]  I'll get the actual definitions and quote them verbatim in that way.
[26:23.660 --> 26:24.660]  Good, good.
[26:24.660 --> 26:30.100]  Okay, I didn't really expect a detailed answer on that, I was asking those for exactly that
[26:30.100 --> 26:35.340]  purpose, for when you're looking at this, or thinking about what they actually mean
[26:35.340 --> 26:36.340]  by these things.
[26:36.340 --> 26:37.340]  Right, right.
[26:37.340 --> 26:44.660]  Now, I have some, you know, because, you know, like I say, there are real gray areas
[26:44.660 --> 26:50.820]  on the transitions between this, and because they almost intertwine, and that's the interesting
[26:50.820 --> 26:51.820]  part about it.
[26:51.820 --> 26:58.780]  Once you hit fraud, you almost hit waste and abuse almost simultaneously, so it's a real
[26:58.780 --> 27:02.020]  concept to figure out.
[27:02.020 --> 27:07.620]  Okay, well that was what I was hoping, you know, over time going through these training
[27:07.620 --> 27:14.980]  and such here, it could give us a really good idea of, you could be our mole in the insurance
[27:14.980 --> 27:20.780]  industry, is to help us figure out how to set them up.
[27:20.780 --> 27:26.540]  Yeah, I already am, so, and if anybody needs any help with their health insurance from
[27:26.540 --> 27:35.420]  under 65 to Medicare, just go to DallasMMS.com, I got my website set up now, it's great.
[27:35.420 --> 27:42.060]  Wait a minute, wait a minute, are you on my show doing shameless self-promotion?
[27:42.060 --> 27:45.300]  I just did, I snuck that one in, of course.
[27:45.300 --> 27:49.820]  That's okay, we allow shameless self-promotion.
[27:49.820 --> 27:52.580]  Well thank you, thank you.
[27:52.580 --> 28:01.620]  So yeah, like I say, if anybody in California, Texas, and soon in Colorado, but yeah, I can
[28:01.620 --> 28:09.300]  crush anybody's plan, man, and save them a ton of money, but DallasMMS.com, but other
[28:09.300 --> 28:13.340]  than that, I'm gonna go ahead and let you get to your next call or something, I'm sure
[28:13.340 --> 28:19.060]  you got a board full already, but I wanted you to know about that 18-USD, that was just
[28:19.060 --> 28:25.100]  creepy, I'll get out some of it, there can legally lie, and they wrote it in there right
[28:25.100 --> 28:28.020]  before our eyes.
[28:28.020 --> 28:33.380]  So we need to take it closely, we need to learn how to use that, and I already have
[28:33.380 --> 28:40.020]  a way, when next time a U.S. attorney threatens me, I'll tell him to go scratch, I can go
[28:40.020 --> 28:44.860]  into court and lie all I want to, and ain't nothing you can do about it.
[28:44.860 --> 28:50.220]  I'm indemnified by your own rules, and see if we can't take that and turn it back against
[28:50.220 --> 28:53.220]  them.
[28:53.220 --> 28:58.980]  So what I get when I try to get to a grand jury, that's when they start threatening me,
[28:58.980 --> 29:04.780]  and this will be helped, so it's okay if I get something wrong because I'm indemnified
[29:04.780 --> 29:06.420]  from that anyway.
[29:06.420 --> 29:12.940]  Well, that's for everybody's knowledge out there, so anyhow, we'll have a good evening,
[29:12.940 --> 29:16.980]  have a good show, I'm following you on the radio, so take care, I'll give you a call
[29:16.980 --> 29:21.260]  because I know your phone doesn't call mine, have a good night.
[29:21.260 --> 29:28.140]  Okay, good night Scott, okay, now we're going to Ralph in Texas, hello Ralph.
[29:28.140 --> 29:30.340]  Hello Randy.
[29:30.340 --> 29:34.020]  Hello, what do you have for us today?
[29:34.020 --> 29:39.980]  Well, I'm wondering if you've ever come across anything like this, a couple of my defendants
[29:39.980 --> 29:43.060]  have disappeared.
[29:43.060 --> 29:46.620]  A couple of your defendants have disappeared?
[29:46.620 --> 29:51.420]  Yes, they are no longer on the style page.
[29:51.420 --> 29:57.620]  Wait a minute, I'm not sure I know what that means, defendant, oh you mean, okay, you're
[29:57.620 --> 30:01.100]  in a case and there were a number.
[30:01.100 --> 30:05.220]  Shhh, keep your voice down.
[30:05.220 --> 30:10.860]  The government now has Russian technology that matches identities to voices so it can tell
[30:10.860 --> 30:11.860]  who's doing the talking.
[30:11.860 --> 30:17.020]  I'm Dr. Kauffman Albrecht, back to tell you how it works after this.
[30:17.020 --> 30:18.740]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.740 --> 30:22.340]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.340 --> 30:27.340]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.340 --> 30:32.580]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.580 --> 30:35.100]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.100 --> 30:40.740]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:40.740 --> 30:42.460]  Yahoo and Bing.
[30:42.460 --> 30:46.180]  Start over with start page.
[30:46.180 --> 30:50.940]  Since 2001, when the Patriot Act opened the doors to electronic surveillance, Big Brother
[30:50.940 --> 30:54.580]  is gone crazy, vacuuming up all of our data.
[30:54.580 --> 30:59.500]  Now it has a new tactic, courtesy of our former communist allies, the Russians.
[30:59.500 --> 31:04.820]  It's called voice grid nation and it analyzes and identifies voices courtesy of Russia's
[31:04.820 --> 31:06.740]  speech technology center.
[31:06.740 --> 31:11.500]  When authorities intercept a call, the speaker's voice is compared to millions of others like
[31:11.500 --> 31:12.500]  a fingerprint.
[31:12.500 --> 31:14.500]  How long does it take for a match?
[31:14.500 --> 31:15.900]  Three seconds.
[31:15.900 --> 31:20.500]  So watch what you say on the phone, comrades, whether you say your name or not, Big Brother
[31:20.500 --> 31:22.020]  may know who's talking.
[31:22.020 --> 31:31.420]  I'm Dr. Kauffman Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.420 --> 31:32.420]  I lost my son.
[31:32.420 --> 31:33.420]  My nephew.
[31:33.420 --> 31:34.420]  My uncle.
[31:34.420 --> 31:35.420]  My son.
[31:35.420 --> 31:36.420]  On September 11, 2000.
[31:36.420 --> 31:39.660]  People don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:39.660 --> 31:43.820]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.820 --> 31:49.660]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1200 architects
[31:49.660 --> 31:53.420]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[31:53.420 --> 31:54.900]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:54.900 --> 31:55.900]  My uncle.
[31:55.900 --> 31:56.900]  My nephew.
[31:56.900 --> 31:57.900]  My son.
[31:57.900 --> 31:58.900]  Go to building what.org.
[31:58.900 --> 31:59.900]  Why it fell.
[31:59.900 --> 32:00.900]  Why it matters.
[32:00.900 --> 32:01.900]  And what you can do.
[32:01.900 --> 32:04.060]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:04.060 --> 32:07.020]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:07.020 --> 32:10.700]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[32:10.700 --> 32:11.700]  them to pay for it.
[32:11.700 --> 32:15.300]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[32:15.300 --> 32:19.100]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[32:19.100 --> 32:21.860]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:21.860 --> 32:26.140]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[32:26.140 --> 32:27.460]  zero complaints.
[32:27.460 --> 32:31.820]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[32:31.820 --> 32:32.900]  first time.
[32:32.900 --> 32:39.220]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:39.220 --> 32:43.580]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos
[32:43.580 --> 32:46.180]  Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:46.180 --> 32:51.340]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:51.340 --> 32:57.340]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:57.340 --> 32:59.620]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:59.620 --> 33:06.620]  And I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:29.620 --> 33:37.220]  Okay, we are back.
[33:37.220 --> 33:47.540]  Randy Kelton, Rural Law Radio on this Friday, the 8th day of February 2019.
[33:47.540 --> 33:52.980]  And we're talking to Ralph in Texas.
[33:52.980 --> 33:58.380]  Okay Ralph, you said your defendants were missing.
[33:58.380 --> 34:02.500]  Are you in a case where there were more than, where there were a number of defendants, let
[34:02.500 --> 34:07.100]  me just tell you back, are you the plaintiff or the defendant?
[34:07.100 --> 34:08.100]  Plaintiff.
[34:08.100 --> 34:14.140]  So defendants have disappeared off your case heading?
[34:14.140 --> 34:15.140]  Yes.
[34:15.140 --> 34:17.300]  Let me back up just a minute.
[34:17.300 --> 34:22.220]  I think I can explain it fairly quickly, and there's several things here.
[34:22.220 --> 34:28.740]  I don't do electronic filing, but I keep an eye on my case by watching the recent entries
[34:28.740 --> 34:32.780]  live feed from the court.
[34:32.780 --> 34:35.100]  You're familiar with that, I'm sure, huh?
[34:35.100 --> 34:36.100]  Yes.
[34:36.100 --> 34:37.100]  Okay.
[34:37.100 --> 34:49.060]  So on the 5th, just a few days ago, there was a, the district judge adopted the report
[34:49.060 --> 34:55.780]  recommendation of the magistrate and issued a final judgment, two different documents.
[34:55.780 --> 34:59.300]  And dismissed my case, of course, which we know that's, you know, that's what they do
[34:59.300 --> 35:00.300]  with the trial court.
[35:00.300 --> 35:02.980]  They just dismissed it and sent it to the appeals court.
[35:02.980 --> 35:08.700]  But anyway, it was in the recent entries on the 5th.
[35:08.700 --> 35:12.740]  So I said, okay, well, I'm going to get that in the mail a few days, and sure enough, on
[35:12.740 --> 35:14.700]  the 7th I got it in the mail.
[35:14.700 --> 35:22.740]  Well, the first thing I noticed was that the envelope was dated the 5th, but the document,
[35:22.740 --> 35:28.540]  both documents, were signed on the 1st.
[35:28.540 --> 35:32.100]  And I just think that's a little bit odd because this is the final judgment.
[35:32.100 --> 35:37.700]  I have only 30 days to appeal it from the day that it's signed.
[35:37.700 --> 35:46.300]  So I got to thinking, well, did the judge predate the final judgment, or did the docket
[35:46.300 --> 35:51.220]  clerk just decide to hold off on putting it into the docket and...
[35:51.220 --> 35:52.220]  Okay.
[35:52.220 --> 35:53.220]  Hold on.
[35:53.220 --> 35:54.940]  I can answer this one.
[35:54.940 --> 35:59.660]  The clerk has no duty to give you notice.
[35:59.660 --> 36:06.060]  If that the clerk gave you notice is a plus.
[36:06.060 --> 36:12.380]  The courts say that your responsibility to check the court record is not the...
[36:12.380 --> 36:16.420]  The clerk does not have a duty to give you notice of rulings.
[36:16.420 --> 36:18.980]  That has been a problem in the past.
[36:18.980 --> 36:25.260]  So whatever day they might have mailed you notice, you won't have a claim because the
[36:25.260 --> 36:28.900]  clerk had no actual duty to give you notice anyway.
[36:28.900 --> 36:29.900]  Okay.
[36:29.900 --> 36:34.140]  I've heard that, but I also read today something about...
[36:34.140 --> 36:39.900]  I say something about because I was reading about it, not the actual rule, was that FRCP
[36:39.900 --> 36:43.900]  77 requires notice.
[36:43.900 --> 36:46.580]  So I'll go back and check on that.
[36:46.580 --> 36:47.580]  Okay.
[36:47.580 --> 36:49.500]  But there's a couple of things in that I was...
[36:49.500 --> 36:50.500]  Wait a minute.
[36:50.500 --> 36:54.740]  There's one thing I don't want to get away from before I address it.
[36:54.740 --> 36:57.580]  The magistrate judge.
[36:57.580 --> 37:00.100]  Who appointed that magistrate judge?
[37:00.100 --> 37:01.100]  Okay.
[37:01.100 --> 37:03.100]  We've talked about this before.
[37:03.100 --> 37:07.060]  I don't know if it's right or wrong, but they give you a magistrate and the magistrate
[37:07.060 --> 37:10.820]  does everything but hear the trial.
[37:10.820 --> 37:11.820]  He takes care of it.
[37:11.820 --> 37:12.820]  Okay.
[37:12.820 --> 37:13.820]  Hold on.
[37:13.820 --> 37:14.820]  Hold on.
[37:14.820 --> 37:15.820]  That's not exactly where I'm going.
[37:15.820 --> 37:23.340]  Recently, the Supreme Court ruled against the Securities and Exchange Commission because
[37:23.340 --> 37:32.060]  the Securities and Exchange Commission was appointing magistrate judges to sit in a securities
[37:32.060 --> 37:39.100]  and exchange court, and they said these guys were not public officials so that they didn't
[37:39.100 --> 37:45.780]  have to be appointed by the president, that they rendered rulings, but those rulings
[37:45.780 --> 37:55.180]  were not final until the SEC panel approved the rulings.
[37:55.180 --> 38:01.740]  So their argument to the Supreme was that they're not officials because their acts are
[38:01.740 --> 38:02.740]  not binding.
[38:02.740 --> 38:06.460]  They have to be approved by someone else.
[38:06.460 --> 38:13.340]  And the Supreme Court said, yes, they are officials, and they do have to be appointed
[38:13.340 --> 38:15.260]  by the president.
[38:15.260 --> 38:21.860]  All of the matters heard by these magistrate judges appointed by the SEC are void and they
[38:21.860 --> 38:24.980]  have to be re-heard.
[38:24.980 --> 38:31.300]  If that is the case with the SEC, that will be the case with the federal courts.
[38:31.300 --> 38:34.500]  I think this happened because Trump hates the SEC.
[38:34.500 --> 38:36.100]  He said to deal with them for years.
[38:36.100 --> 38:41.820]  They've been a thorn in his side, and he got an opportunity to sting them a little bit,
[38:41.820 --> 38:42.820]  and he kind of stung them.
[38:42.820 --> 38:44.220]  He kind of went behind the scenes.
[38:44.220 --> 38:49.220]  If you weren't looking in that particular area, you wouldn't have found it.
[38:49.220 --> 38:54.020]  But I happened to be doing some work in that area, so I come across it.
[38:54.020 --> 39:00.980]  So the Supreme Court ruling, even if Trump got it done just to beat up the SEC, their
[39:00.980 --> 39:04.420]  problem is those rulings apply to everyone.
[39:04.420 --> 39:10.540]  You might want to see, who is this magistrate and how did this magistrate get in place?
[39:10.540 --> 39:16.260]  Did the magistrate get appointed by a district judge?
[39:16.260 --> 39:20.940]  I don't know, but I would presume that he did, yes.
[39:20.940 --> 39:26.980]  And you need to check if he was appointed by a district judge based on brand new law,
[39:26.980 --> 39:33.180]  August of last year, this was the supreme issue, this ruling.
[39:33.180 --> 39:36.740]  Based on this new law, you can challenge the magistrate.
[39:36.740 --> 39:41.140]  Well, but the magistrate is not making any final rulings.
[39:41.140 --> 39:42.660]  Doesn't matter.
[39:42.660 --> 39:47.540]  That's exactly the argument the SEC brought.
[39:47.540 --> 39:54.540]  And the feds and the SCOTUS said makes no difference.
[39:54.540 --> 40:00.620]  They're sitting as a judge, they have to be appointed by the president.
[40:00.620 --> 40:01.620]  That would be interesting.
[40:01.620 --> 40:08.740]  You get those, these district judges are appointing their buddies who will only rule the way they
[40:08.740 --> 40:10.500]  want their buddies to rule.
[40:10.500 --> 40:15.460]  We need the president appointing these guys.
[40:15.460 --> 40:19.900]  And you know, there's stuff in these magistrates down our throats.
[40:19.900 --> 40:23.860]  If you haven't approved of the magistrate, you challenge it anyway.
[40:23.860 --> 40:24.860]  Right.
[40:24.860 --> 40:31.140]  Well, there's two things written, well, there's three things on this final judgment that I
[40:31.140 --> 40:32.660]  wanted to ask you about.
[40:32.660 --> 40:36.860]  I think this is a kind of a win.
[40:36.860 --> 40:41.820]  It says each party shall bear its own cost of court.
[40:41.820 --> 40:45.060]  That is almost a standard.
[40:45.060 --> 40:50.260]  Unless one party is outrageous.
[40:50.260 --> 41:03.260]  And you know, we had this case in Newark where the, we won a petition for writ of mandamus.
[41:03.260 --> 41:09.620]  12% of the rits of mandamus get picked up by the court.
[41:09.620 --> 41:20.260]  22% get ruled in favor of the filer and they got theirs ruled on by a pro se filing.
[41:20.260 --> 41:29.820]  So that means that the behavior of the trial court was absolutely outrageous.
[41:29.820 --> 41:35.140]  And they still, the court said, everybody bears their own cost.
[41:35.140 --> 41:40.300]  So that's not necessarily a win, that's kind of a standard.
[41:40.300 --> 41:44.020]  That's, that's Tim, I've been following that.
[41:44.020 --> 41:49.740]  Well, the reason I said it was because, and this has been bizarre from the beginning,
[41:49.740 --> 41:57.820]  I went to a process server and the process server knew one of the attorneys that I was
[41:57.820 --> 42:04.180]  suing and he told me, this is a process server now, he told me, oh, that's bad news.
[42:04.180 --> 42:08.540]  Oh, that judge, oh, that judge is going to put the attorney fees on you.
[42:08.540 --> 42:13.300]  That process server was trying to get me to not do the lawsuit.
[42:13.300 --> 42:15.300]  If you can believe that.
[42:15.300 --> 42:17.300]  I absolutely do.
[42:17.300 --> 42:21.100]  Well, the process server, he said, he's a constable.
[42:21.100 --> 42:24.500]  He probably knew the attorney as well.
[42:24.500 --> 42:25.900]  They all know each other there.
[42:25.900 --> 42:28.460]  Yeah, this was a private process server.
[42:28.460 --> 42:29.460]  Oh, okay.
[42:29.460 --> 42:36.380]  Well, he might have been sincere because his judge may be causing, have done that to some
[42:36.380 --> 42:40.540]  other people that he's seen, but generally, unless something's really outrageous, that's
[42:40.540 --> 42:41.540]  what they do.
[42:41.540 --> 42:42.540]  Okay.
[42:42.540 --> 42:48.180]  It's this also standard and I have not read any judgments off of the internet because
[42:48.180 --> 42:52.300]  I've been reading several of the papers and this was kind of a spur of the moment call
[42:52.300 --> 42:53.300]  to you.
[42:53.300 --> 42:54.300]  Okay.
[42:54.300 --> 42:58.940]  It says this standard, the clerk of the court is directed to close this case.
[42:58.940 --> 42:59.940]  Okay.
[42:59.940 --> 43:05.540]  They rendered a final judgment.
[43:05.540 --> 43:11.820]  Now you only have a short time to issue a request for findings, effect, and conclusions
[43:11.820 --> 43:17.580]  at law unless you have it in, this is federal, so you have a judgment, I take it, along with
[43:17.580 --> 43:18.580]  your order.
[43:18.580 --> 43:19.580]  Yes.
[43:19.580 --> 43:20.580]  Okay.
[43:20.580 --> 43:21.580]  Hold on.
[43:21.580 --> 43:26.020]  For everybody else, let me explain.
[43:26.020 --> 43:33.220]  In the state, you get an order, in the Fed, you get an order and a judgment.
[43:33.220 --> 43:39.380]  A judgment is findings, effect, and conclusions at law.
[43:39.380 --> 43:42.180]  Without a judgment, you don't have a complete order.
[43:42.180 --> 43:44.980]  There has to be both.
[43:44.980 --> 43:50.620]  But in any case, you can ask for a, for a reconsideration.
[43:50.620 --> 44:01.340]  You don't have 10 days to do that and you say that again.
[44:01.340 --> 44:04.900]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[44:04.900 --> 44:09.300]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.300 --> 44:12.780]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high
[44:12.780 --> 44:14.780]  quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.780 --> 44:18.700]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.700 --> 44:23.340]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers
[44:23.340 --> 44:24.340]  and journalists.
[44:24.340 --> 44:27.300]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.300 --> 44:31.580]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[44:31.580 --> 44:32.580]  Pollen Burst.
[44:32.580 --> 44:37.420]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storeable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[44:37.420 --> 44:39.580]  at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.580 --> 44:43.540]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment.
[44:43.540 --> 44:46.540]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:46.540 --> 44:51.540]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.540 --> 44:54.660]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.660 --> 45:01.340]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:01.340 --> 45:04.540]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.540 --> 45:11.300]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.300 --> 45:14.300]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.300 --> 45:19.060]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.060 --> 45:23.300]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.300 --> 45:28.980]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.980 --> 45:34.900]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.900 --> 45:39.340]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.340 --> 45:43.740]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.740 --> 45:49.860]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.860 --> 45:52.420]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.420 --> 45:56.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.500 --> 46:14.780]  Our call toll-free, 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:14.780 --> 46:30.660]  And if you're not in a lawsuit, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[46:30.660 --> 46:34.660]  I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for
[46:34.660 --> 46:39.660]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no blood
[46:39.660 --> 46:45.660]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons
[46:45.660 --> 46:51.660]  I get my message out, do anyone in the shouting distance
[46:51.660 --> 46:57.660]  I vote for bravery and against slavery to show resistance
[46:57.660 --> 47:02.660]  First I'm rolling, then I'm walking, then I start shouting
[47:02.660 --> 47:06.660]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton and the rule of law radio
[47:06.660 --> 47:10.660]  and we're talking to, where else in Texas
[47:10.660 --> 47:13.660]  and I kind of run off the cliff there again
[47:13.660 --> 47:15.660]  Debra's going to skin me for that
[47:15.660 --> 47:18.660]  Okay, where were we?
[47:18.660 --> 47:24.660]  I said I'm surprised you're having your skin left
[47:24.660 --> 47:28.660]  Debra works me over
[47:28.660 --> 47:32.660]  One day, years ago when I lived down in Austin
[47:32.660 --> 47:36.660]  I was in the studio and Debra was working me over
[47:36.660 --> 47:40.660]  and I come out of the office and her husband Jerry's sitting there
[47:40.660 --> 47:44.660]  and he looks up at me and he said, you know, I really ought to thank you
[47:44.660 --> 47:47.660]  and I'm kind of missed, so I said, for what?
[47:47.660 --> 47:51.660]  Well, Debra's been on use so much lately, she's leaving me alone
[47:51.660 --> 47:54.660]  I'd like with you
[47:54.660 --> 47:58.660]  and I walked out of the house to the sound of Jerry's laughter
[47:58.660 --> 48:01.660]  ringing in my ears
[48:01.660 --> 48:06.660]  but Debra's mellowed out quite a bit in the last few years
[48:06.660 --> 48:12.660]  She's gotten back to religion, you know, every Saturday
[48:12.660 --> 48:15.660]  at Friday they have a religious thing they do
[48:15.660 --> 48:18.660]  where they go to music for the church and such
[48:18.660 --> 48:22.660]  and she's really mellowed out, it's really been good for her
[48:22.660 --> 48:26.660]  so she's not quite as hard on me as she used to be
[48:26.660 --> 48:29.660]  but maybe in a guy we always like to complain about
[48:29.660 --> 48:32.660]  have these women pick on us or us
[48:32.660 --> 48:36.660]  Okay, where were we Ralph?
[48:36.660 --> 48:39.660]  I'm thinking as I'm talking to you
[48:39.660 --> 48:43.660]  how do we structure approaches?
[48:43.660 --> 48:48.660]  I'm getting close to the point that I'm likely to get funded
[48:48.660 --> 48:50.660]  to start building all of these tools
[48:50.660 --> 48:55.660]  and I want to build a very structured tool for the feds
[48:55.660 --> 48:58.660]  so that all of these things are going after like
[48:58.660 --> 49:00.660]  going after the magistrate
[49:00.660 --> 49:05.660]  whether or not he's been appointed by a federal district judge
[49:05.660 --> 49:10.660]  or the president, that is just such a great thing to go after him for
[49:10.660 --> 49:14.660]  because now you're stinging them where they live
[49:14.660 --> 49:18.660]  and if you have opposing counsel
[49:18.660 --> 49:22.660]  the judge is going to be upset at opposing counsel
[49:22.660 --> 49:25.660]  for not pulling you off their case
[49:25.660 --> 49:28.660]  It's all politics
[49:28.660 --> 49:30.660]  Anyway, okay, go ahead
[49:30.660 --> 49:37.660]  Well, so it says the clerk of court is directed to close this case
[49:37.660 --> 49:40.660]  so that's another one of those legal conundrums
[49:40.660 --> 49:42.660]  that drives me up the wall
[49:42.660 --> 49:44.660]  because the case is not closed
[49:44.660 --> 49:47.660]  I can still file a motion for
[49:47.660 --> 49:49.660]  finding the past conclusions as law
[49:49.660 --> 49:52.660]  a motion for reconsideration
[49:52.660 --> 49:56.660]  and a crafting something with your help
[49:56.660 --> 49:59.660]  over these missing defendants
[49:59.660 --> 50:02.660]  a motion for a more definitive statement
[50:02.660 --> 50:05.660]  on where these defendants have went
[50:05.660 --> 50:07.660]  Okay, how is that relevant?
[50:07.660 --> 50:10.660]  If the court dismissed the case
[50:10.660 --> 50:14.660]  were the defendants
[50:14.660 --> 50:16.660]  separately dismissed
[50:16.660 --> 50:20.660]  or did the court just style the case
[50:20.660 --> 50:23.660]  with the plaintiff and the first defendant?
[50:23.660 --> 50:25.660]  That's what they often do
[50:25.660 --> 50:29.660]  Okay, let me think
[50:29.660 --> 50:32.660]  Yeah, I don't know if this is significant
[50:32.660 --> 50:36.660]  I don't know if it is or not, but I am concerned about it at this time
[50:36.660 --> 50:38.660]  Okay, why don't we...
[50:38.660 --> 50:41.660]  What I'm going to is
[50:41.660 --> 50:45.660]  the primary thing you always ask is so what?
[50:45.660 --> 50:47.660]  They don't show these other defendants
[50:47.660 --> 50:49.660]  in the dismissal order so what?
[50:49.660 --> 50:53.660]  Does that mean that the other defendants aren't dismissed?
[50:53.660 --> 50:56.660]  No, I have other defendants listed
[50:56.660 --> 51:00.660]  I just have the two are missing
[51:00.660 --> 51:03.660]  and the two are, are you ready for this?
[51:03.660 --> 51:06.660]  A judge and a prosecutor
[51:06.660 --> 51:08.660]  Are missing?
[51:08.660 --> 51:11.660]  How do you mean missing? Have they not responded?
[51:11.660 --> 51:14.660]  No, here's what happened
[51:14.660 --> 51:18.660]  The year and a half ago
[51:18.660 --> 51:21.660]  they were all the state claims
[51:21.660 --> 51:24.660]  were dismissed against those people
[51:24.660 --> 51:28.660]  Well, the order specifically said
[51:28.660 --> 51:32.660]  state claims are dismissed with prejudice
[51:32.660 --> 51:36.660]  So I said, okay, well that still leaves my federal claims
[51:36.660 --> 51:39.660]  So I kept pounding on my federal claims
[51:39.660 --> 51:42.660]  and they dismissed them as well
[51:42.660 --> 51:44.660]  but they've dismissed all my claims
[51:44.660 --> 51:47.660]  and until now, and now they've dismissed the last two
[51:47.660 --> 51:50.660]  but what they did was
[51:50.660 --> 51:52.660]  we've all been using the first defendant
[51:52.660 --> 51:54.660]  and then add all
[51:54.660 --> 51:58.660]  Well, once the first two, once two of the defendants
[51:58.660 --> 52:01.660]  were dismissed they were no longer a part of the case
[52:01.660 --> 52:06.660]  so they styled the case with the only defendants left
[52:06.660 --> 52:08.660]  that way the clerk doesn't have to serve these people
[52:08.660 --> 52:10.660]  because they're not part of the case anymore
[52:10.660 --> 52:14.660]  at least as far as the trial court is concerned
[52:14.660 --> 52:16.660]  I think there's more to it than that
[52:16.660 --> 52:17.660]  but I'm not sure what it is
[52:17.660 --> 52:19.660]  but with your help maybe I'll figure it out
[52:19.660 --> 52:21.660]  or I'll calm down, I don't know
[52:21.660 --> 52:24.660]  but under the docket
[52:24.660 --> 52:26.660]  they're listed as terminated
[52:26.660 --> 52:29.660]  from the date of the order
[52:29.660 --> 52:31.660]  that dismissed the state claims against them
[52:31.660 --> 52:35.660]  and the defendants railed whenever I said
[52:35.660 --> 52:38.660]  when I came back with the federal claims
[52:38.660 --> 52:41.660]  but then the judge dismissed the federal claims
[52:41.660 --> 52:44.660]  Yeah, under Rooker-Fellman
[52:44.660 --> 52:47.660]  if you brought essentially the same claims
[52:47.660 --> 52:49.660]  in the state and the Fed
[52:49.660 --> 52:53.660]  will not overrule the state under Rooker-Fellman, doctor
[52:53.660 --> 52:56.660]  Well, I have to look, but I know
[52:56.660 --> 52:59.660]  I think those were separate claims
[52:59.660 --> 53:02.660]  I'll have to look and see how close they were
[53:02.660 --> 53:05.660]  or it's not hard to keep track
[53:05.660 --> 53:07.660]  because it doesn't like
[53:07.660 --> 53:10.660]  it's quite a bit to try to handle
[53:10.660 --> 53:14.660]  If the Fed had dismissed under Rooker-Fellman
[53:14.660 --> 53:17.660]  they would have stated that clearly
[53:17.660 --> 53:21.660]  and stated they were dismissed because of Residucata
[53:21.660 --> 53:23.660]  If they didn't state that
[53:23.660 --> 53:27.660]  then they just accepted your separate claims
[53:27.660 --> 53:29.660]  as separate claims
[53:29.660 --> 53:32.660]  and then dismissed those separate claims
[53:32.660 --> 53:35.660]  But, you know, this is a trial court
[53:35.660 --> 53:38.660]  you don't expect to win in the trial court
[53:38.660 --> 53:41.660]  Right, but see, now I looked at my docket
[53:41.660 --> 53:44.660]  and they're listed as terminated
[53:44.660 --> 53:46.660]  I looked at the case summary
[53:46.660 --> 53:48.660]  and the case summary
[53:48.660 --> 53:51.660]  lists each defendant and his attorney
[53:51.660 --> 53:54.660]  but those defendants are not
[53:54.660 --> 53:56.660]  even listed in the case summary
[53:56.660 --> 53:59.660]  Yeah, but that's because the defendants
[53:59.660 --> 54:01.660]  are still subject to appeal
[54:01.660 --> 54:03.660]  they're not gone
[54:03.660 --> 54:06.660]  they're just not before the trial court anymore
[54:06.660 --> 54:09.660]  Okay, but here's the punchline, not here
[54:09.660 --> 54:11.660]  This final judgment
[54:11.660 --> 54:13.660]  has my name versus
[54:13.660 --> 54:17.660]  and it names every single defendant
[54:17.660 --> 54:21.660]  except the judge and the prosecutor
[54:21.660 --> 54:25.660]  And that's because they've already been dismissed from the case
[54:25.660 --> 54:28.660]  All the others have been dismissed from the case for a year
[54:28.660 --> 54:31.660]  It was only one that this final judgment covered
[54:31.660 --> 54:35.660]  All these other defendants were dismissed a year ago
[54:35.660 --> 54:37.660]  Well, that's interesting
[54:37.660 --> 54:40.660]  That's what I'm trying to say, I just don't know how to say it
[54:40.660 --> 54:43.660]  Why they would name all of the original defendants
[54:43.660 --> 54:45.660]  except the judge and the prosecutor
[54:45.660 --> 54:50.660]  I think they're probably just trying to keep their names off the court record
[54:50.660 --> 54:54.660]  Well, I was thinking about doing a motion for information
[54:54.660 --> 54:56.660]  on why they're not in the summary
[54:56.660 --> 54:59.660]  and why they're terminated on the docket
[54:59.660 --> 55:02.660]  and why they're not in the final judgment style
[55:02.660 --> 55:05.660]  on the final judgment paper wasn't on the style
[55:05.660 --> 55:08.660]  Okay, I'm opposing counsel
[55:08.660 --> 55:12.660]  and objection relevance
[55:15.660 --> 55:18.660]  What does it mean? Well, how does it harm?
[55:18.660 --> 55:23.660]  What adjudicatable issue does it point to?
[55:25.660 --> 55:27.660]  I like it when you do that, believe it or not
[55:27.660 --> 55:31.660]  I like it a week or so ago whenever you were reading your book
[55:31.660 --> 55:34.660]  since I haven't finished it myself
[55:34.660 --> 55:38.660]  Yeah, okay, what relevance is it?
[55:38.660 --> 55:42.660]  The only thing I can think of is not much
[55:42.660 --> 55:46.660]  but just messing up the style
[55:46.660 --> 55:49.660]  One of the things I try to be careful about
[55:49.660 --> 55:53.660]  is I try to adjudicate everything I can find
[55:53.660 --> 55:57.660]  but only if I can show harm
[55:57.660 --> 56:01.660]  because the last thing I want to do is go to a lot of trouble
[56:01.660 --> 56:03.660]  to make a claim and get it before the court
[56:03.660 --> 56:06.660]  and the judge says, ah, this is nonsense
[56:06.660 --> 56:09.660]  No harm, no foul
[56:09.660 --> 56:12.660]  Which leads me to something I want to say
[56:12.660 --> 56:15.660]  and no harm, no foul, something I'd like to address
[56:15.660 --> 56:18.660]  Ken Magnuson brought this up
[56:18.660 --> 56:21.660]  Harmless error
[56:21.660 --> 56:26.660]  The courts often dismiss claims against actions
[56:26.660 --> 56:31.660]  by public officials as harmless error
[56:31.660 --> 56:34.660]  and they have a harmless error document
[56:34.660 --> 56:37.660]  doctrine
[56:37.660 --> 56:41.660]  and I'm saying, wait a minute
[56:41.660 --> 56:45.660]  a failure on the part of a public official
[56:45.660 --> 56:48.660]  to perform a duty is required to perform
[56:48.660 --> 56:52.660]  is not harmless error
[56:52.660 --> 56:55.660]  ever
[56:55.660 --> 56:58.660]  it's criminal
[56:58.660 --> 57:02.660]  so they're trying to claim that the law commands me
[57:02.660 --> 57:05.660]  to do a certain thing
[57:05.660 --> 57:08.660]  and I failed to do that certain thing
[57:08.660 --> 57:11.660]  but because you can't prove that you were harmed
[57:11.660 --> 57:14.660]  by my failure to do that certain thing
[57:14.660 --> 57:18.660]  is harmless error and who cares
[57:18.660 --> 57:20.660]  and that's an issue
[57:20.660 --> 57:23.660]  what I want to do is
[57:23.660 --> 57:27.660]  the officer wrote me a ticket for speeding
[57:27.660 --> 57:31.660]  no problem, harmless error
[57:31.660 --> 57:37.660]  I like it, yeah
[57:37.660 --> 57:41.660]  he take their garbage and cram it down their throats
[57:41.660 --> 57:45.660]  unless you can show harm
[57:45.660 --> 57:49.660]  a traffic law violation as far as I can tell
[57:49.660 --> 57:53.660]  does not constitute harm per se
[57:53.660 --> 57:56.660]  and then they want to say that
[57:56.660 --> 57:58.660]  I know in Texas they have a code that says
[57:58.660 --> 58:00.660]  a violation of the penal code
[58:00.660 --> 58:03.660]  is in a violation of the penal code
[58:03.660 --> 58:06.660]  the state is the injured party
[58:06.660 --> 58:09.660]  that's how they show harm
[58:09.660 --> 58:11.660]  so when a public official fails to perform a duty
[58:11.660 --> 58:13.660]  is required to perform
[58:13.660 --> 58:15.660]  it's not harmless error
[58:15.660 --> 58:19.660]  because he harmed the state
[58:19.660 --> 58:22.660]  ah, this is right
[58:22.660 --> 58:24.660]  and the state is the injured party
[58:24.660 --> 58:27.660]  in a violation of the penal law
[58:27.660 --> 58:30.660]  okay, hang on, about to go to break
[58:30.660 --> 58:32.660]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio
[58:32.660 --> 58:36.660]  or call in number 512-646-1984
[58:36.660 --> 58:38.660]  we'll be taking your calls all night
[58:38.660 --> 58:40.660]  we do have a full board
[58:40.660 --> 58:42.660]  so if you try to call in and you can't get in
[58:42.660 --> 58:44.660]  wait until somebody drops off
[58:44.660 --> 58:46.660]  because we can only hold four at one time
[58:46.660 --> 58:47.660]  on the cardboard
[58:47.660 --> 58:49.660]  we'll be right back
[58:49.660 --> 58:52.660]  would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.660 --> 58:54.660]  in your walk with God?
[58:54.660 --> 58:57.660]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.660 --> 58:59.660]  and a set of free Christian books
[58:59.660 --> 59:00.660]  that can really help
[59:00.660 --> 59:02.660]  the New Testament recovery version
[59:02.660 --> 59:04.660]  is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles
[59:04.660 --> 59:05.660]  available today
[59:05.660 --> 59:07.660]  it's an accurate translation
[59:07.660 --> 59:09.660]  and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.660 --> 59:11.660]  that will help you to know God
[59:11.660 --> 59:13.660]  and to know the meaning of life
[59:13.660 --> 59:15.660]  the free books are a three volume set
[59:15.660 --> 59:17.660]  called basic elements of the Christian life
[59:17.660 --> 59:19.660]  chapter by chapter
[59:19.660 --> 59:21.660]  basic elements of the Christian life
[59:21.660 --> 59:23.660]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation
[59:23.660 --> 59:25.660]  growing in Christ
[59:25.660 --> 59:27.660]  and how to build up the church
[59:27.660 --> 59:30.660]  to order your free New Testament recovery version
[59:30.660 --> 59:33.660]  and basic elements of the Christian life
[59:33.660 --> 59:36.660]  call Bibles for America toll free
[59:36.660 --> 59:40.660]  at 888-551-0102
[59:40.660 --> 59:44.660]  that's 888-551-0102
[59:44.660 --> 59:46.660]  or visit us online
[59:46.660 --> 59:49.660]  at bfa.org
[59:49.660 --> 59:52.660]  live free speech radio
[59:52.660 --> 59:55.660]  logosradionetwork.com
[59:59.660 --> 01:00:02.660]  The Falling Use Flash is brought to you by
[01:00:02.660 --> 01:00:04.660]  The Low Star of Lowdown
[01:00:04.660 --> 01:00:07.660]  Providing you daily bulletins for the commodity market
[01:00:07.660 --> 01:00:09.660]  Today in History
[01:00:09.660 --> 01:00:11.660]  News Updates
[01:00:11.660 --> 01:00:20.660]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative
[01:00:20.660 --> 01:00:23.660]  Markets for Wednesday the 6th of February 2019
[01:00:23.660 --> 01:00:26.660]  open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce
[01:00:26.660 --> 01:00:29.660]  silver $15.77 an ounce
[01:00:29.660 --> 01:00:31.660]  copper $2.83 an ounce
[01:00:31.660 --> 01:00:34.660]  oil Texas crude $3.66 a barrel
[01:00:34.660 --> 01:00:36.660]  brand crude $61.98 a barrel
[01:00:36.660 --> 01:00:39.660]  and cryptos in order of market capitalization
[01:00:39.660 --> 01:00:42.660]  Bitcoin $3,401.64
[01:00:42.660 --> 01:00:44.660]  Ripple XRP $0.29
[01:00:44.660 --> 01:00:46.660]  Ethereum $10.10
[01:00:46.660 --> 01:00:50.660]  and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin
[01:00:53.660 --> 01:00:54.660]  Today in History
[01:00:54.660 --> 01:00:57.660]  The year 1918 British women over the age of 30
[01:00:57.660 --> 01:00:59.660]  who meet minimum property qualifications
[01:00:59.660 --> 01:01:02.660]  get the right to vote when the representation
[01:01:02.660 --> 01:01:04.660]  of the People Act of 1918 was passed
[01:01:04.660 --> 01:01:06.660]  by Parliament Today in History
[01:01:06.660 --> 01:01:09.660]  And Recent News
[01:01:09.660 --> 01:01:12.660]  Several Texas based organizations filed a lawsuit today
[01:01:12.660 --> 01:01:14.660]  requesting that a federal court stop the state
[01:01:14.660 --> 01:01:16.660]  from flagging about 95,000 people
[01:01:16.660 --> 01:01:18.660]  as potentially illegally registered to vote.
[01:01:18.660 --> 01:01:21.660]  The list was compiled after an 11 month long investigation
[01:01:21.660 --> 01:01:24.660]  by the office of the Texas Secretary of State
[01:01:24.660 --> 01:01:26.660]  and the Texas Department of Public Safety
[01:01:26.660 --> 01:01:29.660]  which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:01:29.660 --> 01:01:32.660]  who were registered to vote when obtaining age arbitrage license.
[01:01:32.660 --> 01:01:36.660]  Over half of the 95,000 did indeed vote, it seems.
[01:01:36.660 --> 01:01:38.660]  However, further controversy was raised
[01:01:38.660 --> 01:01:40.660]  when it became clear that some of the names
[01:01:40.660 --> 01:01:42.660]  were not in fact belonging to those
[01:01:42.660 --> 01:01:44.660]  who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:44.660 --> 01:01:47.660]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants
[01:01:47.660 --> 01:01:49.660]  become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:01:49.660 --> 01:01:51.660]  Registered voters who receive letters
[01:01:51.660 --> 01:01:53.660]  querying their citizenship have 30 days
[01:01:53.660 --> 01:01:55.660]  to respond with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:55.660 --> 01:01:57.660]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
[01:01:57.660 --> 01:02:00.660]  and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State
[01:02:00.660 --> 01:02:03.660]  have yet to officially comment regarding this list
[01:02:03.660 --> 01:02:05.660]  and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:08.660 --> 01:02:10.660]  A Texas man of only 24 years old,
[01:02:10.660 --> 01:02:13.660]  William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck
[01:02:13.660 --> 01:02:16.660]  after a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[01:02:16.660 --> 01:02:18.660]  It apparently happened in the parking lot
[01:02:18.660 --> 01:02:20.660]  of the vape shop where he got it.
[01:02:20.660 --> 01:02:22.660]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal
[01:02:22.660 --> 01:02:24.660]  was embedded in his brainstem.
[01:02:24.660 --> 01:02:27.660]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ has refused to comment.
[01:02:27.660 --> 01:02:30.660]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz,
[01:02:30.660 --> 01:02:33.660]  interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director
[01:02:33.660 --> 01:02:35.660]  of Grow Local, South Texas,
[01:02:35.660 --> 01:02:37.660]  concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers
[01:02:37.660 --> 01:02:39.660]  and Gardeners Association Conference,
[01:02:39.660 --> 01:02:42.660]  which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel
[01:02:42.660 --> 01:02:45.660]  from February 14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[01:02:45.660 --> 01:02:49.660]  You can find the interview at kiiitv.com.
[01:02:49.660 --> 01:02:56.660]  This is Rick Rode with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:20.660 --> 01:03:23.660]  Hmm, I don't see Ralph.
[01:03:23.660 --> 01:03:25.660]  It looks like Ralph dropped off.
[01:03:25.660 --> 01:03:27.660]  Ralph, if you're done,
[01:03:27.660 --> 01:03:29.660]  then we'll move on, if not, call back
[01:03:29.660 --> 01:03:31.660]  and we'll finish up.
[01:03:31.660 --> 01:03:34.660]  But I think we were kind of finished with you.
[01:03:34.660 --> 01:03:37.660]  Now we're going to Neil in Pennsylvania.
[01:03:37.660 --> 01:03:40.660]  Hello Neil, what do you have for us today?
[01:03:44.660 --> 01:03:46.660]  Hello Neil.
[01:03:46.660 --> 01:03:48.660]  Hmm.
[01:03:48.660 --> 01:03:51.660]  It looks like we may have lost Neil.
[01:03:54.660 --> 01:03:57.660]  Or, I might as well call him or just reset itself.
[01:03:57.660 --> 01:04:00.660]  I thought for a second there we'd lost the caller board.
[01:04:00.660 --> 01:04:02.660]  Okay, Neil, are you there?
[01:04:04.660 --> 01:04:06.660]  Okay, we will try Neil later.
[01:04:06.660 --> 01:04:08.660]  Now we're going to Max in Texas.
[01:04:08.660 --> 01:04:10.660]  Hello, Max.
[01:04:10.660 --> 01:04:13.660]  Oh, hello, Mr. Kelton.
[01:04:13.660 --> 01:04:16.660]  Hello, Mr. Kelton.
[01:04:16.660 --> 01:04:21.660]  I actually have recently sent some PIRs
[01:04:21.660 --> 01:04:24.660]  under the 552 government code
[01:04:24.660 --> 01:04:28.660]  to possible precincts for hearing...
[01:04:28.660 --> 01:04:30.660]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:04:30.660 --> 01:04:34.660]  For everybody's benefit, avoid acronyms like the plague.
[01:04:34.660 --> 01:04:36.660]  Roger, Roger.
[01:04:36.660 --> 01:04:38.660]  Okay, I'll go ahead and stretch it out.
[01:04:38.660 --> 01:04:42.660]  I recently submitted public information requests
[01:04:42.660 --> 01:04:46.660]  to, let's see,
[01:04:46.660 --> 01:04:48.660]  Harris County Constable Precinct 4
[01:04:48.660 --> 01:04:53.660]  and the Home Rule Municipality of Jersey Village
[01:04:53.660 --> 01:04:56.660]  asking their public information officers to supply me
[01:04:56.660 --> 01:04:59.660]  with the memorandum of understanding between the DPS
[01:04:59.660 --> 01:05:02.660]  in order to certify their officers
[01:05:02.660 --> 01:05:05.660]  under the administrative code.
[01:05:05.660 --> 01:05:07.660]  Oh, wonderful, wonderful.
[01:05:07.660 --> 01:05:09.660]  Now I don't have any tickets with them,
[01:05:09.660 --> 01:05:11.660]  so I'm coming out of them.
[01:05:11.660 --> 01:05:13.660]  I'm calling them to the principal's office
[01:05:13.660 --> 01:05:15.660]  rather than the other way around.
[01:05:15.660 --> 01:05:16.660]  I'm a stranger to them.
[01:05:16.660 --> 01:05:18.660]  I've never interacted with them.
[01:05:18.660 --> 01:05:21.660]  This is the best fight to have.
[01:05:21.660 --> 01:05:24.660]  The one you picked.
[01:05:24.660 --> 01:05:27.660]  Well, see, what they decided to do is they decided
[01:05:27.660 --> 01:05:29.660]  that I believe it's a delay tactic,
[01:05:29.660 --> 01:05:31.660]  but I could improve it,
[01:05:31.660 --> 01:05:34.660]  so I'll just act like that's not the case.
[01:05:34.660 --> 01:05:37.660]  They sent me one of the two questions
[01:05:37.660 --> 01:05:39.660]  they were allowed to ask me under 552,
[01:05:39.660 --> 01:05:42.660]  which was a request for clarification
[01:05:42.660 --> 01:05:45.660]  as to the records that I'm asking for,
[01:05:45.660 --> 01:05:47.660]  and so now I believe...
[01:05:47.660 --> 01:05:50.660]  Oh, hold on, hold on.
[01:05:50.660 --> 01:05:57.660]  If you requested a memorandum of understanding,
[01:05:57.660 --> 01:06:00.660]  that is as clear as it can get.
[01:06:00.660 --> 01:06:04.660]  I suggest you file a criminal complaint against them.
[01:06:04.660 --> 01:06:09.660]  Now, with violations of 552 government code,
[01:06:09.660 --> 01:06:12.660]  original jurisdiction goes to the attorney general
[01:06:12.660 --> 01:06:15.660]  of the state of Texas, Mr. Paxton, right?
[01:06:15.660 --> 01:06:17.660]  Yes, it does.
[01:06:17.660 --> 01:06:22.660]  Okay, and so they asked me for clarification.
[01:06:22.660 --> 01:06:25.660]  I thought it was as clear as glass, but what I...
[01:06:25.660 --> 01:06:28.660]  It's a frivolous request.
[01:06:28.660 --> 01:06:30.660]  Why is that?
[01:06:30.660 --> 01:06:34.660]  I once had a file in Webeson County
[01:06:34.660 --> 01:06:36.660]  a request for all documents collected,
[01:06:36.660 --> 01:06:38.660]  simply maintained by the department
[01:06:38.660 --> 01:06:42.660]  that are specifically referenced by article 17.30,
[01:06:42.660 --> 01:06:44.660]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:06:44.660 --> 01:06:46.660]  and they sent this assistant DA,
[01:06:46.660 --> 01:06:48.660]  assistant county attorney out,
[01:06:48.660 --> 01:06:51.660]  and, you know, I'm a guy,
[01:06:51.660 --> 01:06:54.660]  and I like, you know, like any other guy,
[01:06:54.660 --> 01:06:56.660]  I like good-looking women.
[01:06:56.660 --> 01:06:58.660]  This was a good-looking woman,
[01:06:58.660 --> 01:07:01.660]  with big old hooters,
[01:07:01.660 --> 01:07:03.660]  short miniskirt,
[01:07:03.660 --> 01:07:05.660]  so tight she could barely walk,
[01:07:05.660 --> 01:07:07.660]  stripper heels,
[01:07:07.660 --> 01:07:10.660]  low-cut blouse.
[01:07:10.660 --> 01:07:12.660]  I was offended.
[01:07:12.660 --> 01:07:14.660]  Story.
[01:07:14.660 --> 01:07:17.660]  You know, I like three women as much as anyone,
[01:07:17.660 --> 01:07:19.660]  but as a prosecuting attorney,
[01:07:19.660 --> 01:07:22.660]  she's dressed like a stripper?
[01:07:22.660 --> 01:07:23.660]  Yeah.
[01:07:23.660 --> 01:07:25.660]  What the heck is this crap all in?
[01:07:25.660 --> 01:07:27.660]  They sent her out to talk to me.
[01:07:27.660 --> 01:07:29.660]  Somehow, if they sent her out,
[01:07:29.660 --> 01:07:31.660]  I would be easy to deal with.
[01:07:31.660 --> 01:07:32.660]  Right.
[01:07:32.660 --> 01:07:33.660]  And she said,
[01:07:33.660 --> 01:07:36.660]  Mr. Colton, I've read your request,
[01:07:36.660 --> 01:07:39.660]  but I'm not sure what you're looking for,
[01:07:39.660 --> 01:07:41.660]  can you clarify?
[01:07:41.660 --> 01:07:43.660]  I said, yes, ma'am, I can.
[01:07:43.660 --> 01:07:46.660]  I want to see
[01:07:46.660 --> 01:07:52.660]  exactly what I asked for in that request.
[01:07:52.660 --> 01:07:55.660]  She stood there looking at me like,
[01:07:55.660 --> 01:07:59.660]  can I get the bailiff to come and beat this guy up?
[01:07:59.660 --> 01:08:02.660]  May I interject there?
[01:08:02.660 --> 01:08:04.660]  The thing is,
[01:08:04.660 --> 01:08:07.660]  I used one of, you know,
[01:08:07.660 --> 01:08:10.660]  on Eddie Craig's Facebook page,
[01:08:10.660 --> 01:08:13.660]  they have some public information requests
[01:08:13.660 --> 01:08:17.660]  that are pre-done for specific officers.
[01:08:17.660 --> 01:08:19.660]  Like, if you've gotten a ticket,
[01:08:19.660 --> 01:08:21.660]  then you put that officer,
[01:08:21.660 --> 01:08:24.660]  you're asking for that officer's specific certification,
[01:08:24.660 --> 01:08:27.660]  oath of office, anti bribery statement,
[01:08:27.660 --> 01:08:28.660]  so on and so forth.
[01:08:28.660 --> 01:08:30.660]  But what I did,
[01:08:30.660 --> 01:08:32.660]  because I have no ticket and I have no case
[01:08:32.660 --> 01:08:33.660]  before these people,
[01:08:33.660 --> 01:08:36.660]  I asked them for any and all of your officers
[01:08:36.660 --> 01:08:40.660]  whose duties include, you know,
[01:08:40.660 --> 01:08:43.660]  issuing citations to motorists.
[01:08:43.660 --> 01:08:47.660]  So I understand that is a little bit broad.
[01:08:47.660 --> 01:08:50.660]  No, that's not a bit broad.
[01:08:50.660 --> 01:08:53.660]  But they didn't ask me to narrow the scope,
[01:08:53.660 --> 01:08:55.660]  which was the other question they could ask me.
[01:08:55.660 --> 01:08:57.660]  They asked me for clarification
[01:08:57.660 --> 01:08:59.660]  as to the records that I was getting,
[01:08:59.660 --> 01:09:01.660]  you know, or requesting.
[01:09:01.660 --> 01:09:03.660]  You know, so...
[01:09:03.660 --> 01:09:07.660]  Did you give a list of records that you were requesting?
[01:09:07.660 --> 01:09:09.660]  Correct, yes.
[01:09:09.660 --> 01:09:12.660]  I wanted the memorandum understanding.
[01:09:12.660 --> 01:09:15.660]  I don't need to list them then.
[01:09:15.660 --> 01:09:19.660]  Okay, if you gave them a list of documents
[01:09:19.660 --> 01:09:22.660]  and they asked you for clarification,
[01:09:22.660 --> 01:09:24.660]  that's delay for delay's sake.
[01:09:24.660 --> 01:09:26.660]  That should get a criminal complaint.
[01:09:26.660 --> 01:09:27.660]  That's what I suspected.
[01:09:27.660 --> 01:09:28.660]  That's what I suspected.
[01:09:28.660 --> 01:09:31.660]  But I have 61 days to respond
[01:09:31.660 --> 01:09:33.660]  from my understanding under 552.
[01:09:33.660 --> 01:09:37.660]  I have 61 days to respond, you know,
[01:09:37.660 --> 01:09:39.660]  to their request for clarification.
[01:09:39.660 --> 01:09:44.660]  And I know that according to the PIR handbook
[01:09:44.660 --> 01:09:46.660]  put out by the Attorney General,
[01:09:46.660 --> 01:09:49.660]  I'm not allowed to make these people do legal research
[01:09:49.660 --> 01:09:52.660]  because they're not lawyers, they're just, you know,
[01:09:52.660 --> 01:09:55.660]  custodians of records and so on and so forth.
[01:09:55.660 --> 01:10:00.660]  Okay, you asked them for specific documents.
[01:10:00.660 --> 01:10:02.660]  You didn't ask them for law.
[01:10:02.660 --> 01:10:03.660]  Correct.
[01:10:03.660 --> 01:10:06.660]  You didn't ask them any legal questions.
[01:10:06.660 --> 01:10:10.660]  So that wouldn't apply.
[01:10:10.660 --> 01:10:15.660]  Okay, so if it was just for delay's sake,
[01:10:15.660 --> 01:10:23.660]  I did not see any kind of prohibition of them doing that
[01:10:23.660 --> 01:10:27.660]  except for if they're asking for an attorney general's opinion
[01:10:27.660 --> 01:10:29.660]  for delay's sake.
[01:10:29.660 --> 01:10:31.660]  Not asking for clarification.
[01:10:31.660 --> 01:10:33.660]  They asked you for clarification
[01:10:33.660 --> 01:10:38.660]  when you asked for specific documents.
[01:10:38.660 --> 01:10:39.660]  Okay.
[01:10:39.660 --> 01:10:45.660]  How much clearer can you get than asking for specific documents?
[01:10:45.660 --> 01:10:49.660]  You didn't ask a general question.
[01:10:49.660 --> 01:10:52.660]  All of the documents collected are simply maintained
[01:10:52.660 --> 01:10:56.660]  by the department that in any way relate to this issue.
[01:10:56.660 --> 01:10:59.660]  Now they can ask for clarification.
[01:10:59.660 --> 01:11:00.660]  Okay.
[01:11:00.660 --> 01:11:05.660]  On Jurisimprudence.website,
[01:11:05.660 --> 01:11:12.660]  I have a scope and content information request.
[01:11:12.660 --> 01:11:13.660]  Okay.
[01:11:13.660 --> 01:11:16.660]  And the scope and content information request
[01:11:16.660 --> 01:11:22.660]  asks for the designations of all of the records they keep
[01:11:22.660 --> 01:11:26.660]  and they always want clarification on that one
[01:11:26.660 --> 01:11:28.660]  because I ask for everything.
[01:11:28.660 --> 01:11:31.660]  I want a list of all of the records that you keep,
[01:11:31.660 --> 01:11:33.660]  the substantive content of those records,
[01:11:33.660 --> 01:11:35.660]  not the actual content,
[01:11:35.660 --> 01:11:38.660]  but the type of information kept in those records.
[01:11:38.660 --> 01:11:41.660]  How those records are kept, what media they're kept in,
[01:11:41.660 --> 01:11:46.660]  how they're designated and how I can request those,
[01:11:46.660 --> 01:11:50.660]  how and from whom I can request those particular documents.
[01:11:50.660 --> 01:11:53.660]  And they always ask me for clarification.
[01:11:53.660 --> 01:11:55.660]  And I always respond,
[01:11:55.660 --> 01:12:00.660]  if you have a problem understanding what I'm asking for,
[01:12:00.660 --> 01:12:03.660]  ask the legislature to explain
[01:12:03.660 --> 01:12:08.660]  because this request is taken out of the code where it stipulates
[01:12:08.660 --> 01:12:14.660]  what information is specifically made open for public inspection.
[01:12:14.660 --> 01:12:15.660]  Right.
[01:12:15.660 --> 01:12:21.660]  And that's under the control of Attorney General's opinion.
[01:12:21.660 --> 01:12:25.660]  No, this is in the code.
[01:12:25.660 --> 01:12:31.660]  The code says you shall make this information available
[01:12:31.660 --> 01:12:35.660]  and I quoted it right out of the code.
[01:12:35.660 --> 01:12:38.660]  If you can't understand the legislation,
[01:12:38.660 --> 01:12:41.660]  ask the legislature what they meant by it.
[01:12:41.660 --> 01:12:44.660]  Don't ask me to explain it.
[01:12:44.660 --> 01:12:46.660]  I can't ask you for legal advice.
[01:12:46.660 --> 01:12:49.660]  You can't ask me for legal advice.
[01:12:49.660 --> 01:12:52.660]  And yours, yours were so specific that...
[01:12:52.660 --> 01:12:55.660]  Here was the tack that I took.
[01:12:55.660 --> 01:12:58.660]  What I ended up doing is kind of writing this for a person
[01:12:58.660 --> 01:13:03.660]  who's not legally astute so that I wasn't trying to over confuse them,
[01:13:03.660 --> 01:13:08.660]  but I pasted in the code and I told them that I would be so kind
[01:13:08.660 --> 01:13:14.660]  as to highlight in green the specific statements in the statute
[01:13:14.660 --> 01:13:19.660]  and the requirements that would cause to be generated a record
[01:13:19.660 --> 01:13:22.660]  that was in the scope of my request.
[01:13:22.660 --> 01:13:24.660]  You see what I mean?
[01:13:24.660 --> 01:13:30.660]  So I dumbed it down for them and I'm going to see if I can fin that
[01:13:30.660 --> 01:13:36.660]  and see if they're going to ask me for further to narrow the scope,
[01:13:36.660 --> 01:13:39.660]  which is the only other question they're allowed to ask me,
[01:13:39.660 --> 01:13:41.660]  which of course they've already asked me.
[01:13:41.660 --> 01:13:42.660]  Were you in an accident?
[01:13:42.660 --> 01:13:43.660]  Were you arrested?
[01:13:43.660 --> 01:13:45.660]  And which a whole bunch of questions they're not allowed to ask me,
[01:13:45.660 --> 01:13:50.660]  which already they're in violation of 552 right there
[01:13:50.660 --> 01:13:52.660]  because they're not allowed to ask that.
[01:13:52.660 --> 01:13:57.660]  But anyway, I wanted to kind of ram this clarification thing through
[01:13:57.660 --> 01:13:59.660]  and you know...
[01:13:59.660 --> 01:14:04.660]  Well, what I suggest is ultimately I want the record
[01:14:04.660 --> 01:14:08.660]  or the lack thereof to be certified.
[01:14:08.660 --> 01:14:12.660]  What I suggest is you file your opposition to it
[01:14:12.660 --> 01:14:15.660]  along with a verified criminal affidavit,
[01:14:15.660 --> 01:14:19.660]  accusing them of violating the act by the filing of this.
[01:14:19.660 --> 01:14:23.660]  That they don't get often.
[01:14:23.660 --> 01:14:28.660]  They're used to people picking up the gauntlet and fighting with them.
[01:14:28.660 --> 01:14:34.660]  They're not used to somebody holding them strictly to rules of law.
[01:14:34.660 --> 01:14:35.660]  Right.
[01:14:35.660 --> 01:14:37.660]  And they barely responded in time.
[01:14:37.660 --> 01:14:41.660]  I was so excited that I was going to get sent a criminal complaint to the attorney general.
[01:14:41.660 --> 01:14:48.660]  But anyway, but okay, now that aside, next question, let's move on.
[01:14:48.660 --> 01:14:54.660]  If I were to get either a certified statement from say a municipality
[01:14:54.660 --> 01:15:00.660]  that does not qualify under Rule 4.13, you know, Title 37 administrative code,
[01:15:00.660 --> 01:15:07.660]  they don't make the requirements for a municipality to even certify officers.
[01:15:07.660 --> 01:15:13.660]  And if I can get them to send me a certified, you know, a response back saying
[01:15:13.660 --> 01:15:16.660]  that we have no records responsive to your request,
[01:15:16.660 --> 01:15:21.660]  then is there any way that I could like take out a full page ad
[01:15:21.660 --> 01:15:27.660]  and say like the municipal newspaper or perhaps get a sign and, you know,
[01:15:27.660 --> 01:15:33.660]  put up a sign somewhere in the small jurisdiction such that I can get other people
[01:15:33.660 --> 01:15:39.660]  involved and engaged in this battle with me?
[01:15:39.660 --> 01:15:42.660]  Do you have a pickup truck?
[01:15:42.660 --> 01:15:45.660]  I do.
[01:15:45.660 --> 01:15:52.660]  You can put any sign in the back of a pickup truck that you want to.
[01:15:52.660 --> 01:15:56.660]  Putting signs on the ground can get problems,
[01:15:56.660 --> 01:16:02.660]  but you can put a sign in the back of that pickup truck and park in front of the courthouse.
[01:16:02.660 --> 01:16:11.660]  But would they be able to deny me the ability to like say take out a half page, you know?
[01:16:11.660 --> 01:16:16.660]  That would be up to the publisher.
[01:16:16.660 --> 01:16:21.660]  A lot of times they won't accept an ad that's controversial,
[01:16:21.660 --> 01:16:25.660]  especially if it's a small town, small paper.
[01:16:25.660 --> 01:16:30.660]  In Wise County, the biggest paper here is the Wise County Messenger.
[01:16:30.660 --> 01:16:33.660]  Roy Eaton is the owner of the Messenger.
[01:16:33.660 --> 01:16:38.660]  The last words he ever said to me was get out.
[01:16:38.660 --> 01:16:44.660]  I told him, if it's news, Roy, you won't print it.
[01:16:44.660 --> 01:16:46.660]  Get out.
[01:16:46.660 --> 01:16:47.660]  He threw you out.
[01:16:47.660 --> 01:16:50.660]  So he wouldn't do anything that was in any way controversial.
[01:16:50.660 --> 01:16:52.660]  He would not touch it.
[01:16:52.660 --> 01:16:54.660]  So that may be a problem.
[01:16:54.660 --> 01:16:55.660]  It depends on the issue.
[01:16:55.660 --> 01:16:56.660]  Hang on.
[01:16:56.660 --> 01:16:57.660]  About to go to break.
[01:16:57.660 --> 01:16:59.660]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:59.660 --> 01:17:04.660]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.660 --> 01:17:08.660]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:17:08.660 --> 01:17:14.660]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.660 --> 01:17:20.660]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.660 --> 01:17:24.660]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:17:24.660 --> 01:17:26.660]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.660 --> 01:17:28.660]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:28.660 --> 01:17:33.660]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.660 --> 01:17:38.660]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.660 --> 01:17:40.660]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.660 --> 01:17:46.660]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner,
[01:17:46.660 --> 01:17:49.660]  or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.660 --> 01:17:56.660]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:56.660 --> 01:17:59.660]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.660 --> 01:18:00.660]  I love logos.
[01:18:00.660 --> 01:18:04.660]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.660 --> 01:18:07.660]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.660 --> 01:18:08.660]  I need my truth fake.
[01:18:08.660 --> 01:18:12.660]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:12.660 --> 01:18:15.660]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite,
[01:18:15.660 --> 01:18:19.660]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:19.660 --> 01:18:21.660]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.660 --> 01:18:23.660]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.660 --> 01:18:29.660]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.660 --> 01:18:31.660]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.660 --> 01:18:34.660]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.660 --> 01:18:37.660]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.660 --> 01:18:43.660]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.660 --> 01:18:44.660]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.660 --> 01:18:45.660]  No.
[01:18:45.660 --> 01:18:47.660]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.660 --> 01:18:48.660]  No.
[01:18:48.660 --> 01:18:49.660]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:18:49.660 --> 01:18:50.660]  No.
[01:18:50.660 --> 01:18:51.660]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.660 --> 01:18:55.660]  Well, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:55.660 --> 01:18:56.660]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.660 --> 01:18:58.660]  We are logos.
[01:18:58.660 --> 01:19:00.660]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:00.660 --> 01:19:02.660]  It is.
[01:19:02.660 --> 01:19:04.660]  The logos.
[01:19:04.660 --> 01:19:05.660]  Logos.
[01:19:05.660 --> 01:19:06.660]  Radio.
[01:19:06.660 --> 01:19:07.660]  Network.
[01:19:07.660 --> 01:19:07.660]  Radio.
[01:19:07.660 --> 01:19:08.660]  Network.
[01:19:08.660 --> 01:19:09.660]  Radio.
[01:19:09.660 --> 01:19:10.660]  Network.
[01:19:10.660 --> 01:19:11.660]  Radio.
[01:19:11.660 --> 01:19:12.660]  Network.
[01:19:12.660 --> 01:19:13.660]  Radio.
[01:19:13.660 --> 01:19:14.660]  Network.
[01:19:14.660 --> 01:19:15.660]  Radio.
[01:19:15.660 --> 01:19:16.660]  Network.
[01:19:16.660 --> 01:19:17.660]  Radio.
[01:19:17.660 --> 01:19:18.660]  Network.
[01:19:18.660 --> 01:19:19.660]  Radio.
[01:19:19.660 --> 01:19:20.660]  Network.
[01:19:20.660 --> 01:19:22.660]  Don't call me
[01:19:31.820 --> 01:19:39.340]  Okay, we are back Randy Kelton rule law radio, and we're talking to Mack at Mack and Max in Texas
[01:19:40.740 --> 01:19:43.500]  I just got someone up on my
[01:19:44.780 --> 01:19:46.780]  Cocker bridge
[01:19:46.980 --> 01:19:48.980]  Okay, go ahead Max
[01:19:48.980 --> 01:19:58.740]  Okay, so anyway, I'm uh, I am so sick of what what I've seen is the people who take up this fight
[01:20:00.140 --> 01:20:02.140]  Whether they you know follow
[01:20:02.900 --> 01:20:08.940]  You in your electronic lawyer, which I'd love to see you add some AI technology and machine learning to
[01:20:09.580 --> 01:20:11.580]  Because I think that's the only way it's gonna work
[01:20:11.900 --> 01:20:16.220]  But hold on hold on and do you have knowledge in AI and machine learning?
[01:20:16.220 --> 01:20:23.220]  Well, yeah, and there's a lot of open-source libraries for AI and machine learning and stuff like that
[01:20:23.220 --> 01:20:26.700]  Okay, but when we get done with this board, I'll speak to that
[01:20:28.220 --> 01:20:30.220]  Okay, yes, yes, I am doing that
[01:20:31.820 --> 01:20:35.860]  Okay, okay, go ahead. Well, so so here's my problem is I am
[01:20:36.420 --> 01:20:39.100]  I've noticed that those of us
[01:20:40.100 --> 01:20:43.020]  Especially here in Harris County and us Houston folks
[01:20:43.020 --> 01:20:49.940]  Houston strong, you know, I hope some guys out there are listening, you know, you know Tommy Hargraves and everybody and
[01:20:50.100 --> 01:20:51.460]  and then and
[01:20:51.460 --> 01:20:57.660]  We need we need to get together and we need to kind of beat up these municipalities that don't even qualify to
[01:20:57.900 --> 01:21:04.060]  Certify officers because I'm tired of just solving the problem for myself and getting myself dismissals
[01:21:04.060 --> 01:21:07.940]  I want this idea of perpetual probable cause
[01:21:07.940 --> 01:21:15.300]  I haven't quite figured out how I can make it go away for everybody
[01:21:15.980 --> 01:21:23.140]  Instead of just myself, you know, I can get a dismissal. Okay. Okay. Hold on. Are you familiar with traffic ticket website?
[01:21:24.460 --> 01:21:30.340]  Traffic ticket website. That is your kind of a prototype electronic lawyer where you type in, you know
[01:21:30.500 --> 01:21:35.220]  What happened at the stop and the various stuff like that. No, you just put in the ticket information
[01:21:35.220 --> 01:21:38.180]  I don't I have the
[01:21:39.500 --> 01:21:43.260]  Questionnaires built for it, but I haven't implemented them yet
[01:21:43.940 --> 01:21:51.420]  Well, what I was thinking AI would help you with what I was thinking AI would help you with is because when people type into a
[01:21:53.420 --> 01:21:58.020]  Submission box on a website they have a tendency of being very
[01:21:58.020 --> 01:22:04.740]  Passionate and they have skin in the game and they're saying things that aren't facts and
[01:22:05.300 --> 01:22:09.700]  And and and that and that would have a natural tendency to confuse the computer
[01:22:10.340 --> 01:22:14.540]  Especially if it doesn't have AI or machine learning involved in it. We see what I mean
[01:22:14.540 --> 01:22:17.900]  We got all we got all that handles without AI and
[01:22:19.460 --> 01:22:23.020]  Okay, let me speak to that to AI I
[01:22:23.020 --> 01:22:31.900]  Was at a meeting of big data programmers and they were complaining that AI had not lived up to its expectations
[01:22:33.620 --> 01:22:36.380]  So I said guys, you're talking about
[01:22:37.340 --> 01:22:42.420]  Artificial intelligence and you're speaking to the subject from a high level of abstraction
[01:22:43.940 --> 01:22:45.940]  My question to you is
[01:22:46.620 --> 01:22:48.620]  What is the organic?
[01:22:48.620 --> 01:22:55.380]  Intelligence that you're trying to artificially emulate. I have this program
[01:22:56.140 --> 01:23:00.260]  That will kick any living lawyers behind
[01:23:00.260 --> 01:23:06.740]  And it has no intelligence whatsoever and this one guy said wait a minute
[01:23:06.740 --> 01:23:11.860]  I'm a lawyer and I take exception to that. I said present company included
[01:23:12.420 --> 01:23:15.660]  All this tool does is connect the dots
[01:23:15.660 --> 01:23:22.460]  Yes, but I what I'm so hold on hold on I can't find that place
[01:23:24.660 --> 01:23:30.900]  Between connecting the dots and this thing we call intelligence
[01:23:31.780 --> 01:23:35.580]  I'm coming to believe that this concept of
[01:23:37.660 --> 01:23:39.660]  Organic intelligence is
[01:23:41.740 --> 01:23:43.740]  Wrong-headed
[01:23:43.740 --> 01:23:46.500]  We have this notion that there's some
[01:23:47.700 --> 01:23:57.300]  Magical sentient thing that makes our intelligence special. I'm not so sure if there is it may all be connecting the dots
[01:23:57.980 --> 01:24:00.580]  With the tool that I am developing
[01:24:01.460 --> 01:24:03.460]  We're right now working
[01:24:04.660 --> 01:24:09.180]  Down through all the things we can do with
[01:24:10.140 --> 01:24:12.140]  straightforward algorithms
[01:24:12.140 --> 01:24:14.140]  Yeah, I
[01:24:14.900 --> 01:24:25.220]  I can get them all separated and here's the place where I need intelligence. I can sort all of the case law
[01:24:25.940 --> 01:24:27.940]  By the law it references
[01:24:28.380 --> 01:24:32.980]  For some reason Lexus nexus Westlaw and none of these guys ever figured that out
[01:24:33.940 --> 01:24:37.220]  Yeah, you go and try to find the first case on point
[01:24:37.220 --> 01:24:42.340]  So you start searching with keywords long long long
[01:24:42.980 --> 01:24:44.980]  That's the way they've done it for 800 years
[01:24:46.620 --> 01:24:53.620]  Scribes would take down the case and set out keywords to indicate what the issues were and they would
[01:24:54.100 --> 01:24:57.020]  put all those keywords in encyclopedias and
[01:24:57.580 --> 01:24:58.940]  a
[01:24:58.940 --> 01:25:05.980]  Representative set of cases for each of the keywords and this is a way for 800 years lawyers have done legal research until the mid 70s
[01:25:05.980 --> 01:25:07.900]  when
[01:25:07.900 --> 01:25:10.400]  Lexus nexus and Westlaw come along and
[01:25:11.620 --> 01:25:13.620]  They said we don't have to depend on this
[01:25:15.140 --> 01:25:20.620]  Old encyclopedia with a limited number of cases we use our whiz-bang tool and
[01:25:21.540 --> 01:25:28.620]  Search the entire database instead of only having 20 or 30 cases to work from you can have 10,000
[01:25:29.220 --> 01:25:31.220]  Good luck with that. Yes
[01:25:31.220 --> 01:25:37.220]  Yeah, after the mid 70s, you'd stop seeing lawyers in general practice
[01:25:38.740 --> 01:25:46.580]  Westlaw and nexus nexus that ruined the practice of law, but nobody ever figured it out
[01:25:48.020 --> 01:25:50.020]  Yeah, don't do it. Yeah
[01:25:50.900 --> 01:25:52.580]  Here's the problem
[01:25:52.580 --> 01:25:56.500]  Randy is that is that how would you tell?
[01:25:56.500 --> 01:26:03.380]  Let's say a burgeoning newborn AI a baby AI
[01:26:04.220 --> 01:26:08.820]  How would you teach it how to shepherd eyes cases? I don't need it to
[01:26:10.100 --> 01:26:11.780]  Yes, you do
[01:26:11.780 --> 01:26:14.420]  Hold on. You didn't let me finish. I
[01:26:15.740 --> 01:26:18.940]  Can do and I can automatically shepherd eyes cases
[01:26:20.060 --> 01:26:24.500]  Well using like I can do it all the simple algorithms
[01:26:24.500 --> 01:26:29.340]  Do don't need AI for that. Okay
[01:26:30.380 --> 01:26:35.860]  Instead of looking for key words to find your first case on point
[01:26:36.980 --> 01:26:39.700]  Case law is called case law
[01:26:41.140 --> 01:26:44.540]  Every case goes to some law
[01:26:46.020 --> 01:26:48.020]  Yeah, first thing we do is
[01:26:48.020 --> 01:26:55.660]  is we run an algorithm on the case law and everywhere a case represents a law
[01:26:55.860 --> 01:26:59.340]  We put a link to that case and add it we build a
[01:27:00.380 --> 01:27:02.580]  database with all the
[01:27:03.380 --> 01:27:05.140]  statutes in it
[01:27:05.140 --> 01:27:10.540]  Yeah, everywhere a statutes referenced by a case we put a link to that case at that statute
[01:27:10.980 --> 01:27:15.740]  Yeah, yeah, yeah, but you're using relational databases. You need to use Jason
[01:27:15.740 --> 01:27:18.620]  You're it's irrelevant. Rather. I use relational
[01:27:19.420 --> 01:27:22.340]  graphical link list doesn't matter what kind of use
[01:27:23.340 --> 01:27:30.580]  That doesn't matter. No, the structure different the structure matters newer Jason is newer and it's Jason
[01:27:30.740 --> 01:27:33.260]  Jason is just for interpage refresh
[01:27:34.100 --> 01:27:36.100]  This is not
[01:27:36.100 --> 01:27:38.100]  Doesn't go to any particular
[01:27:38.820 --> 01:27:40.820]  language I
[01:27:41.100 --> 01:27:43.620]  have an issue with the current
[01:27:43.620 --> 01:27:45.620]  Programming languages
[01:27:46.620 --> 01:27:51.660]  Which is a whole other discussion about the scarcity model. They're all built on the scarcity model
[01:27:51.660 --> 01:27:58.700]  I think Python Python will do with you. What do you need? Yeah, but pythons that don't need Python for what I'm doing
[01:27:59.740 --> 01:28:01.740]  This is far simpler than that
[01:28:02.820 --> 01:28:05.340]  No, this is a problem. I have reprogrammers
[01:28:06.260 --> 01:28:09.940]  They all want to make this they only use their whiz-bang tools
[01:28:09.940 --> 01:28:15.860]  To do this job for them and I don't want to use any sophisticated tools
[01:28:16.700 --> 01:28:18.700]  Until I've done all the basics
[01:28:19.260 --> 01:28:23.980]  Well, no, you're an engineer and you and you connect a to b to see yeah
[01:28:23.980 --> 01:28:30.860]  And and that's so and that's beautiful. That's beautiful algorithmically, but unfortunately with with artificial intelligence
[01:28:31.380 --> 01:28:37.540]  That is not how it works my friend. It works. I don't know what the heck do I need with artificial intelligence? I
[01:28:37.540 --> 01:28:39.540]  Didn't get this all done straightforward
[01:28:40.660 --> 01:28:46.180]  What you need with artificial intelligence is because you sir cannot fit the
[01:28:47.060 --> 01:28:51.260]  amount of algorithms into a teacup and make your electronic lawyer
[01:28:51.940 --> 01:28:59.020]  Work with with more than just Texas law the whole time yet and listen hold on you've been working on that electronic lawyer
[01:28:59.620 --> 01:29:04.180]  That is an unstated. That's a that's a false presupposition. Yes, I can
[01:29:04.180 --> 01:29:09.020]  It is not near as hard as we tend to think it is
[01:29:10.340 --> 01:29:15.020]  Yeah, I'm an engineer. Yeah, I take things I take things apart in little pieces
[01:29:16.700 --> 01:29:19.580]  Lawyers have not figured this part out
[01:29:20.460 --> 01:29:25.620]  But if I took a bunch of ten year olds and put them in a room and say I have this problem
[01:29:26.260 --> 01:29:32.500]  I've got all this case law over here all these opinions these judges have come up with and
[01:29:32.500 --> 01:29:36.900]  And they're different opinions on different laws and I need all of these cases
[01:29:38.140 --> 01:29:43.620]  Separated out so I can find the cases that address specific laws. How would I do that?
[01:29:43.620 --> 01:29:46.620]  And they'd come up with it almost immediately
[01:29:47.740 --> 01:29:51.020]  Well, just well look for the cases by the laws
[01:29:51.980 --> 01:29:55.980]  Lawyers are trying to find the cases by some keyword they make up
[01:29:55.980 --> 01:30:02.220]  The first search on Lexus should be
[01:30:02.220 --> 01:30:09.500]  Is too much internet driving Americans crazy new research says the web can make us lonely and depressed and even
[01:30:09.900 --> 01:30:16.180]  Psychotic I've got your Catherine Albright and I'll talk about the internet's impact on our state of mind in a moment
[01:30:17.380 --> 01:30:21.220]  Privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself
[01:30:21.220 --> 01:30:27.340]  You'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:30:27.700 --> 01:30:33.900]  So protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy
[01:30:33.900 --> 01:30:40.060]  It's worth hanging on to this message is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine
[01:30:40.180 --> 01:30:44.700]  Alternative to Google yahoo and Bing start over with start page
[01:30:44.700 --> 01:30:50.580]  It's no secret many Americans spend more time tweeting texting and emailing than they do sleeping
[01:30:50.580 --> 01:30:57.700]  But can too much time online make us plum crazy proof is piling up that the internet may be making us lonelier more depressed
[01:30:57.700 --> 01:31:02.700]  Prone to obsessive compulsive disorders and in extreme cases even psychotic
[01:31:02.700 --> 01:31:08.700]  Researchers are documenting actual changes in the brain caused by even moderate web exposure
[01:31:08.700 --> 01:31:13.700]  They're finding that digitized minds are constantly scanning for a fix just like that
[01:31:13.700 --> 01:31:20.700]  Drug addicts with every ping delivering a squirt of Dilba mean that many reward system for opening that message
[01:31:20.700 --> 01:31:22.700]  Maybe it's time we stopped answering the call
[01:31:22.700 --> 01:31:27.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright for start page dot com the world's most private search engine
[01:31:29.700 --> 01:31:35.700]  This is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:31:35.700 --> 01:31:37.700]  The government says that fire brought it down however
[01:31:37.700 --> 01:31:43.700]  1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition over 6000
[01:31:43.700 --> 01:31:48.700]  My fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow first responders of dying
[01:31:48.700 --> 01:31:52.700]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist structural engineer in New York City correctional
[01:31:52.700 --> 01:31:57.700]  I'm an Air Force pilot my father who lost his son we're Americans and we deserve the truth
[01:31:57.700 --> 01:32:00.700]  Go to rememberbuilding7.org today
[01:32:00.700 --> 01:32:07.700]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's America we live in an us against them society
[01:32:07.700 --> 01:32:12.700]  If we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[01:32:12.700 --> 01:32:15.700]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[01:32:15.700 --> 01:32:19.700]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law
[01:32:19.700 --> 01:32:25.700]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[01:32:25.700 --> 01:32:30.700]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[01:32:30.700 --> 01:32:35.700]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:32:35.700 --> 01:32:40.700]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[01:32:40.700 --> 01:32:45.700]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book the Texas Transportation Code the law versus the lie
[01:32:45.700 --> 01:32:50.700]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:32:50.700 --> 01:32:54.700]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material for ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:54.700 --> 01:32:59.700]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve
[01:32:59.700 --> 01:33:22.700]  Looking for some truth you found it LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:30.700 --> 01:33:39.700]  Okay, we're back Randy Kelton rule of law radio on this Friday the 8th day of February 2019 and
[01:33:39.700 --> 01:33:44.700]  Max there was a place I was going this is something I've been working on a long time
[01:33:44.700 --> 01:33:52.700]  We can organize all of the cases by the laws that they represent
[01:33:52.700 --> 01:34:01.700]  Once I have all the cases linked to the laws that they represent what we then we take all of the cases
[01:34:01.700 --> 01:34:10.700]  And run a search on the cases for all of the cases each case references
[01:34:10.700 --> 01:34:16.700]  Then I have a complete database of all the cases and every time a case is referenced
[01:34:16.700 --> 01:34:22.700]  I put a mark at that case's location in a tally field
[01:34:22.700 --> 01:34:27.700]  I keep a tally of how many times it's been referenced
[01:34:27.700 --> 01:34:33.700]  Once I've got that done then we do a search on the database for a specific statute
[01:34:33.700 --> 01:34:38.700]  And all of the cases that reference that statute we drop them in a folder
[01:34:38.700 --> 01:34:51.700]  And then we index that folder by the cases that are in there by the number of times they have been referenced in the entire database
[01:34:51.700 --> 01:34:59.700]  Once you've got that lined out now we've got all the cases lined out with the ones that are cited the most and less and less and less and less
[01:34:59.700 --> 01:35:03.700]  Let's take Brady and Miranda
[01:35:03.700 --> 01:35:14.700]  Both of those go to discovery. Brady grants you the right to discovery in a criminal case
[01:35:14.700 --> 01:35:21.700]  Brady restricts how discovery can be used in a criminal case
[01:35:21.700 --> 01:35:29.700]  You can never get to Miranda without going through Brady
[01:35:29.700 --> 01:35:36.700]  All the way this Brady will come before Miranda and Brady because Miranda distinguishes Brady
[01:35:36.700 --> 01:35:42.700]  Miranda will have less hits in the entire database than Brady does
[01:35:42.700 --> 01:35:49.700]  So we can line these cases out by the number of times they've been hit and we have a hierarchy
[01:35:49.700 --> 01:36:00.700]  And it implies the linkage of cases from the more general Brady to the more specific where Miranda and then issues under Miranda
[01:36:00.700 --> 01:36:07.700]  We can essentially imply the entire fact set
[01:36:07.700 --> 01:36:12.700]  Okay, here's what I need artificial intelligence for
[01:36:12.700 --> 01:36:19.700]  I want the tool to look in Brady and Miranda cases that reference those two
[01:36:19.700 --> 01:36:24.700]  They will both be referenced in a single paragraph
[01:36:24.700 --> 01:36:27.700]  Almost always we're very close to each other
[01:36:27.700 --> 01:36:39.700]  Now I want the AI engine to look at that and create a question that would attach Brady to Miranda
[01:36:39.700 --> 01:36:42.700]  I know how to do that, that's real easy
[01:36:42.700 --> 01:36:54.700]  When you look at the cases you say, okay, did the prosecuting attorney attempt to introduce evidence that he secured from the accused before the accused was ready to rise?
[01:36:54.700 --> 01:36:58.700]  It's easy for a human to do that
[01:36:58.700 --> 01:37:01.700]  We are really, really good at asking questions
[01:37:01.700 --> 01:37:08.700]  So the question to you, Max, how do you create questions in your mind?
[01:37:08.700 --> 01:37:14.700]  Well, here's the problem with communicating questions for an AI to process
[01:37:14.700 --> 01:37:21.700]  Is that human beings, especially when they have skin in the game, have a hard time making it
[01:37:21.700 --> 01:37:24.700]  No, no, wait, wait, you're answering a different question
[01:37:24.700 --> 01:37:25.700]  Okay, okay
[01:37:25.700 --> 01:37:30.700]  How do you formulate a question?
[01:37:30.700 --> 01:37:36.700]  If we're going to get an AI engine to be able to emulate organic intelligence
[01:37:36.700 --> 01:37:39.700]  We have to figure out what that organic intelligence is
[01:37:39.700 --> 01:37:42.700]  Now every human being knows how to answer questions
[01:37:42.700 --> 01:37:49.700]  The first use a human being puts to language is to formulate questions
[01:37:49.700 --> 01:37:52.700]  We learn how to do that when we're two
[01:37:52.700 --> 01:37:56.700]  But it's buried so deep in our psyche
[01:37:56.700 --> 01:38:00.700]  We need a question and the question just comes to mind
[01:38:00.700 --> 01:38:05.700]  We have no conscious representation of how we created that question
[01:38:05.700 --> 01:38:14.700]  How do we know how to manipulate these lines on papers that form words in a dictionary?
[01:38:14.700 --> 01:38:20.700]  How do we rearrange those from a statement and turn them into a question?
[01:38:20.700 --> 01:38:26.700]  If I can figure that out and teach an AI engine to do that
[01:38:26.700 --> 01:38:31.700]  That's all I needed to do, the rest of it I can do with algorithms
[01:38:31.700 --> 01:38:35.700]  Because of the quintessential rule of garbage in garbage out
[01:38:35.700 --> 01:38:48.700]  If you give the AI a very biased statement to where you're making things that are inferences and not facts
[01:38:48.700 --> 01:38:59.700]  The computer and the AI will have a hard time distinguishing between what is something that you're just being angry about
[01:38:59.700 --> 01:39:04.700]  Because you have a hard time presenting it dispassionately to the computer
[01:39:04.700 --> 01:39:10.700]  And that's what the AI will have to learn over time
[01:39:10.700 --> 01:39:17.700]  Have you ever heard of transformational grammar?
[01:39:17.700 --> 01:39:19.700]  No, enlighten me
[01:39:19.700 --> 01:39:24.700]  You should look into transformational grammar if you're working toward AI
[01:39:24.700 --> 01:39:35.700]  Transformational grammar takes grammar apart and doesn't just deal with static grammar like our classes in grade school did
[01:39:35.700 --> 01:39:47.700]  But deals with dynamic grammar, distortions, deletions, nominalizations, how the mind uses language
[01:39:47.700 --> 01:39:54.700]  And there's a book by Grindr and Bandler called Structures of Magic
[01:39:54.700 --> 01:40:03.700]  It's Drives Gunpowder, written by clinical psychologists for clinical psychologists
[01:40:03.700 --> 01:40:08.700]  But it was written by Grindr who's an engineer
[01:40:08.700 --> 01:40:13.700]  And I use that sometimes on the air
[01:40:13.700 --> 01:40:20.700]  When I get someone that's in a highly emotional state, sometimes I get people that frighten me
[01:40:20.700 --> 01:40:26.700]  Because I get people that are so on the edge that I worry for them
[01:40:26.700 --> 01:40:32.700]  When I get that, then I shift into what Grindr and Bandler call the metamodel
[01:40:32.700 --> 01:40:38.700]  And in the metamodel, I only pay attention to the descriptive words people use
[01:40:38.700 --> 01:40:43.700]  And ask for the deletions that are included in those descriptive words
[01:40:43.700 --> 01:40:47.700]  Often there are verbs, adverbs, and nominalizations
[01:40:47.700 --> 01:40:54.700]  Nominalization is where you've taken a verb, a process, and turned it into a noun like mad
[01:40:54.700 --> 01:40:56.700]  He makes me mad
[01:40:56.700 --> 01:40:58.700]  Mad is not a thing
[01:40:58.700 --> 01:41:02.700]  Mad is a behavioral set
[01:41:02.700 --> 01:41:06.700]  I want to know what's in that behavioral set
[01:41:06.700 --> 01:41:14.700]  If when you were growing up, if your parents were reasonable in understanding when they're angry
[01:41:14.700 --> 01:41:17.700]  You're likely to have that in your angry set
[01:41:17.700 --> 01:41:26.700]  But if they weren't, and you're not consciously aware of the limitations of the particular behavioral set that's been elicited
[01:41:26.700 --> 01:41:31.700]  You don't know what you're doing, you're just doing this little unconscious dance
[01:41:31.700 --> 01:41:41.700]  This formational grammar is a way to take the living functional language and take it apart in pieces
[01:41:41.700 --> 01:41:45.700]  That I could teach an AI engine to understand
[01:41:45.700 --> 01:41:55.700]  This is how you make a procedural program using if and conditional statements
[01:41:55.700 --> 01:42:01.700]  But AI acts differently, and AI is trained differently
[01:42:01.700 --> 01:42:04.700]  How is it trained differently? I'm familiar with an AI classifier
[01:42:04.700 --> 01:42:08.700]  How is a classifier different than, say, an array?
[01:42:08.700 --> 01:42:22.700]  AI is basically saying it gives it a rating between true and not true or irrelevant
[01:42:22.700 --> 01:42:30.700]  And I said that when your electronic lawyer site asks people to explain what happens
[01:42:30.700 --> 01:42:32.700]  They have a tendency to
[01:42:32.700 --> 01:42:34.700]  Okay, hold on, hold on
[01:42:34.700 --> 01:42:35.700]  Emotional passion
[01:42:35.700 --> 01:42:36.700]  Misunderstanding
[01:42:36.700 --> 01:42:37.700]  To that answer
[01:42:37.700 --> 01:42:44.700]  My electronic lawyer site never asks anyone to explain what happened
[01:42:44.700 --> 01:42:47.700]  Never, we don't go there
[01:42:47.700 --> 01:42:57.700]  How do you quantify the elements that the electronic lawyer is to spit out and make relevant?
[01:42:57.700 --> 01:42:58.700]  We ask code
[01:42:58.700 --> 01:42:59.700]  We ask form
[01:42:59.700 --> 01:43:03.700]  Were you arrested? Yes or no?
[01:43:03.700 --> 01:43:07.700]  Were you arrested for an on-site offense?
[01:43:07.700 --> 01:43:15.700]  If they say yes, to your knowledge, did the officer, the arresting officer personally see or hear the offense being committed? Yes or no?
[01:43:15.700 --> 01:43:17.700]  Everything's yes or no
[01:43:17.700 --> 01:43:21.700]  We're not asking for explanations, we're asking for legal elements
[01:43:21.700 --> 01:43:30.700]  And we can walk through the whole case and pull out the facts as they relate to legal elements
[01:43:30.700 --> 01:43:33.700]  We don't need them to explain
[01:43:33.700 --> 01:43:36.700]  Explanation that gets you in trouble
[01:43:36.700 --> 01:43:43.700]  Randy, I'm curious to see if you are using AI, machine learning, deep learning and stuff like this
[01:43:43.700 --> 01:43:48.700]  In order to augment your electronic lawyer
[01:43:48.700 --> 01:43:53.700]  I haven't found, hold on, we're about to go to break, we'll pick this up on the other side
[01:43:53.700 --> 01:43:56.700]  Randy, we'll be right back
[01:43:59.700 --> 01:44:05.700]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition
[01:44:05.700 --> 01:44:10.700]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that
[01:44:10.700 --> 01:44:16.700]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:44:16.700 --> 01:44:21.700]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated
[01:44:21.700 --> 01:44:24.700]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[01:44:24.700 --> 01:44:30.700]  Logo Sweden Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[01:44:30.700 --> 01:44:33.700]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much
[01:44:33.700 --> 01:44:39.700]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others
[01:44:39.700 --> 01:44:47.700]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[01:44:47.700 --> 01:44:51.700]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us
[01:44:51.700 --> 01:44:58.700]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income
[01:44:58.700 --> 01:45:00.700]  Order now
[01:45:00.700 --> 01:45:03.700]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.700 --> 01:45:10.700]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course
[01:45:10.700 --> 01:45:14.700]  That will show you how in 24 hours, you step by step
[01:45:14.700 --> 01:45:18.700]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:45:18.700 --> 01:45:22.700]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[01:45:22.700 --> 01:45:27.700]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[01:45:27.700 --> 01:45:33.700]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[01:45:33.700 --> 01:45:42.700]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:45:42.700 --> 01:45:51.700]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[01:45:51.700 --> 01:46:00.700]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:46:00.700 --> 01:46:29.700]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Max in Texas, and yes Max, I'm trying to get to AI
[01:46:29.700 --> 01:46:37.700]  But what I'm trying to do is not ask AI to do more than I needed to do
[01:46:37.700 --> 01:46:45.700]  The more complex information I give it, the less effective and efficient it's going to be
[01:46:45.700 --> 01:46:48.700]  The more I sort out...
[01:46:48.700 --> 01:46:52.700]  The opposite is true, garbage in, garbage out
[01:46:52.700 --> 01:47:02.700]  I'm talking to AI guys, and what they're telling me is be kind of quiet about that AI stuff
[01:47:02.700 --> 01:47:07.700]  Because when you get down to the end of the day, it's all algorithms
[01:47:07.700 --> 01:47:15.700]  The AI classifier, it will determine how well the AI engine does, and it's just a set of algorithms
[01:47:15.700 --> 01:47:24.700]  We keep increasing the sophistication of our algorithms, but there really isn't something called artificial intelligence
[01:47:24.700 --> 01:47:39.700]  It has the appearance of being intelligent, but only because we have our algorithms so sophisticated that they do things that appear that only humans would be able to do
[01:47:39.700 --> 01:47:45.700]  Do you remember the movies, the Lord of the Rings movies?
[01:47:45.700 --> 01:47:49.700]  I am not a movie guy, I'm a top radio guy
[01:47:49.700 --> 01:47:59.700]  Okay, well, they were really well done movies, and they had these hordes of elves and orcs and all these different creatures
[01:47:59.700 --> 01:48:08.700]  They had six basic structures, and on those structures they built different characters, they're all animated
[01:48:08.700 --> 01:48:14.700]  And they built an AI program to control them, and one night they were just screwing with it
[01:48:14.700 --> 01:48:22.700]  And they set the program, they set two groups against one another, and just set the AI program running
[01:48:22.700 --> 01:48:29.700]  So that when they did something and it moved them ahead, they did more of that, they did something that didn't work, they quit doing that
[01:48:29.700 --> 01:48:36.700]  They set it running, come back the next day, and they said they looked at what it was doing and scared them, they had shut it off
[01:48:36.700 --> 01:48:45.700]  Now they knew that wasn't intelligent, but it looked so intelligent, it made them uncomfortable
[01:48:45.700 --> 01:48:54.700]  At the end of the day, it may turn out that this whole idea of intelligence is not what we think it is
[01:48:54.700 --> 01:49:11.700]  That we have a need to think that we are sentient in a way that is beyond connecting the dots, and there may not be any intelligence past connecting the dots
[01:49:11.700 --> 01:49:19.700]  I understand that, but to think that there is no such thing as artificial intelligence, I think is a bit short-sighted
[01:49:19.700 --> 01:49:22.700]  And I know that you believe in artificial intelligence
[01:49:22.700 --> 01:49:31.700]  I'm not saying there is no such thing, I'm saying that these guys who are talking about artificial intelligence are talking about it from a high level of abstraction
[01:49:31.700 --> 01:49:36.700]  I want to get down to a little more specifics
[01:49:36.700 --> 01:49:45.700]  I once built a mental model of the living mind, I have it in a mind map
[01:49:45.700 --> 01:49:56.700]  Where I imagined that I was an alien zoo while I just sent to a backwater corner of the galaxy to examine a bipedal creature Homo sapien sapien
[01:49:56.700 --> 01:50:04.700]  I could not interfere with the creature, I couldn't dissect it, I couldn't touch it, all I could do was observe
[01:50:04.700 --> 01:50:11.700]  What can we tell about Homo sapien sapien just from observation?
[01:50:11.700 --> 01:50:21.700]  From that I built a map and it started with instinctual imperatives
[01:50:21.700 --> 01:50:27.700]  We tend to think that human beings primary instinct is survival and that is not true
[01:50:27.700 --> 01:50:37.700]  That's true of tiger, but not of a lion and not of a human, primary instinct for human beings protection of the group
[01:50:37.700 --> 01:50:43.700]  Humans herd, that's why you can get kids to go to war to fight for home and family
[01:50:43.700 --> 01:50:50.700]  Because primary instinctual imperatives is integrity of the group, then personal integrity
[01:50:50.700 --> 01:50:57.700]  I just built this map, now the map may not be right, and who cares, I got one
[01:50:57.700 --> 01:51:05.700]  So if we encounter a phenomenon that doesn't match the map, then we look at the map and say okay, how can we adjust the map
[01:51:05.700 --> 01:51:13.700]  So it predicts the phenomenon, and it predicted a set of tools that I use, I use these on the air all the time
[01:51:13.700 --> 01:51:22.700]  I have it written up or a representation of a tool, I call it the rubber ball theory
[01:51:22.700 --> 01:51:24.700]  And if you want to copy I'll send it to you
[01:51:24.700 --> 01:51:27.700]  I know the rubber ball, pattern interruptions
[01:51:27.700 --> 01:51:38.700]  Yeah, but what it's based on is the idea that everything the brain does, it does by internal reference
[01:51:38.700 --> 01:51:46.700]  We develop mental context, anger, frustration, happiness
[01:51:46.700 --> 01:52:00.700]  And the conscious aspect looks out at the environment, the conscious aspect is the only one that can directly detect the environment, it has about five instruments it uses to detect the environment with
[01:52:00.700 --> 01:52:11.700]  It accumulates that information, and another aspect of mind that is generally not subconscious, but not paid attention to
[01:52:11.700 --> 01:52:16.700]  We don't pay attention to this because of the way we've defined our experience
[01:52:16.700 --> 01:52:28.700]  Primarily we have defined emotions as if they were nouns, and they're not nouns, they're verbs, they're communications
[01:52:28.700 --> 01:52:42.700]  And once you understand the emotions of communications between one aspect of the mind and the conscious aspect, when you figure that out, everything changes
[01:52:42.700 --> 01:52:47.700]  You very quickly realize it ain't like we think it is
[01:52:47.700 --> 01:52:55.700]  These are tools I use on the air all the time, I tell these stories on the air, all of them are therapeutic metaphors, all of them
[01:52:55.700 --> 01:53:05.700]  So the suing of your worst nightmare, I love these stories, and I remember them all
[01:53:05.700 --> 01:53:15.700]  Those are therapeutic metaphors, they're very carefully designed to match the way the human mind does what it does
[01:53:15.700 --> 01:53:17.700]  If they seem compelling, that's one
[01:53:17.700 --> 01:53:20.700]  It has a lot to do with your rubber ball theory
[01:53:20.700 --> 01:53:23.700]  It has all to do with the rubber ball theory
[01:53:23.700 --> 01:53:25.700]  Pattern interruption
[01:53:25.700 --> 01:53:33.700]  Exactly, I tell people that I have this strategy that using this strategy I can change you
[01:53:33.700 --> 01:53:38.700]  You can know that I'm doing it, know when I'm doing it, how I'm doing it, you can't even think about it
[01:53:38.700 --> 01:53:43.700]  Matter of fact, using the same techniques, you can change me
[01:53:43.700 --> 01:53:48.700]  I can know you're doing it, know when and how you're doing it, and I can't do anything about it
[01:53:48.700 --> 01:53:53.700]  Matter of fact, if I know you're doing it, it works better
[01:53:53.700 --> 01:53:56.700]  Max, have you read the rubber ball theory?
[01:53:56.700 --> 01:54:01.700]  The rubber ball theory? You explained the rubber ball theory to me
[01:54:01.700 --> 01:54:07.700]  Okay, then if you got it, then it's clear that if I do a pattern interruption
[01:54:07.700 --> 01:54:15.700]  If I make your expectation come false, then there is nothing more powerful
[01:54:15.700 --> 01:54:22.700]  However, if I do that with the intent of manipulating you into responding a certain way
[01:54:22.700 --> 01:54:27.700]  You will catch me every time it won't work
[01:54:27.700 --> 01:54:31.700]  But if I just interrupt a pattern and leave you hanging
[01:54:31.700 --> 01:54:36.700]  Then the air mind says, holy crap, we don't have a behavior for this
[01:54:36.700 --> 01:54:42.700]  And it pushes what was an automatic response set up into the conscious awareness
[01:54:42.700 --> 01:54:47.700]  Hey guy, this thing did not work, you need to look at it and fix it
[01:54:47.700 --> 01:54:54.700]  The way the conscious aspect becomes aware that something is being pushed up to it
[01:54:54.700 --> 01:54:58.700]  To look at is it feels it, the inner mind doesn't speak
[01:54:58.700 --> 01:55:02.700]  Randy, I've taken up like three years' segment
[01:55:02.700 --> 01:55:06.700]  I'm not really, okay, you understand, I'm not really just talking to you
[01:55:06.700 --> 01:55:09.700]  I've talked to everybody else
[01:55:09.700 --> 01:55:12.700]  We're talking to all of Texas
[01:55:12.700 --> 01:55:17.700]  This is about how things work, and when you go to AI
[01:55:17.700 --> 01:55:20.700]  Then we understand, the only way we're going to get AI to work
[01:55:20.700 --> 01:55:24.700]  Is we need to understand what these patterns are
[01:55:24.700 --> 01:55:30.700]  That you and I are working from that are not necessarily conscious
[01:55:30.700 --> 01:55:36.700]  We learned when we were two how to create questions
[01:55:36.700 --> 01:55:39.700]  I don't know how I do that
[01:55:39.700 --> 01:55:44.700]  The conclusions cannot be inferred by human beings
[01:55:44.700 --> 01:55:50.700]  It's much better for AI, naturally, when the computer
[01:55:50.700 --> 01:55:56.700]  How do I create AI when I don't know what OI is?
[01:55:56.700 --> 01:55:58.700]  OI
[01:55:58.700 --> 01:56:04.700]  Organic intelligence, I'm trying to create an artificial representation of an intelligence
[01:56:04.700 --> 01:56:07.700]  And I can't define the intelligence
[01:56:07.700 --> 01:56:14.700]  Organic intelligence, the common Texan has hardly any idea
[01:56:14.700 --> 01:56:18.700]  Of exactly how his government is supposed to work
[01:56:18.700 --> 01:56:20.700]  That's a separate issue
[01:56:20.700 --> 01:56:23.700]  I'm talking about how the brain works
[01:56:23.700 --> 01:56:28.700]  What is this thing we call intelligence?
[01:56:28.700 --> 01:56:33.700]  How can we define that in a way that we can create an artificial representation of it?
[01:56:33.700 --> 01:56:40.700]  Intelligence, when it is of an organic source
[01:56:40.700 --> 01:56:44.700]  When it's human beings intelligence, that's one thing
[01:56:44.700 --> 01:56:47.700]  And that also encompasses common sense
[01:56:47.700 --> 01:56:52.700]  However, when it comes to artificial intelligence and machine learning
[01:56:52.700 --> 01:56:55.700]  There is no such thing as common sense
[01:56:55.700 --> 01:56:59.700]  What it actually learns from is patterns
[01:56:59.700 --> 01:57:04.700]  But now we're talking generally about artificial intelligence
[01:57:04.700 --> 01:57:07.700]  I'm trying to define it
[01:57:07.700 --> 01:57:12.700]  I've taken up too much time
[01:57:12.700 --> 01:57:15.700]  Can I ask you one more question?
[01:57:15.700 --> 01:57:16.700]  Absolutely
[01:57:16.700 --> 01:57:20.700]  My email address for people who are in Harris County
[01:57:20.700 --> 01:57:24.700]  And we can get together
[01:57:24.700 --> 01:57:26.700]  Can I give out my email address?
[01:57:26.700 --> 01:57:27.700]  Sure
[01:57:27.700 --> 01:57:29.700]  Other people who are interested can...
[01:57:29.700 --> 01:57:31.700]  Okay, thank you
[01:57:31.700 --> 01:57:35.700]  My email address is MAX
[01:57:35.700 --> 01:57:43.700]  Which is mikealfaxray.alphalemavictoralphaalpha
[01:57:43.700 --> 01:57:47.700]  at protonmail.com
[01:57:47.700 --> 01:57:50.700]  Guys, if we're in Harris County
[01:57:50.700 --> 01:57:52.700]  Let's back each other up
[01:57:52.700 --> 01:57:56.700]  We know these guys are not following the right rules
[01:57:56.700 --> 01:57:57.700]  We understand that
[01:57:57.700 --> 01:57:59.700]  So let's group together
[01:57:59.700 --> 01:58:03.700]  And let's make verified criminal complaints
[01:58:03.700 --> 01:58:05.700]  Against these people
[01:58:05.700 --> 01:58:07.700]  They're doing it wrong
[01:58:07.700 --> 01:58:11.700]  They're doing it without certification
[01:58:11.700 --> 01:58:16.700]  And possibly without qualification
[01:58:16.700 --> 01:58:19.700]  So I would like some people to get a hold of me
[01:58:19.700 --> 01:58:20.700]  That would be great
[01:58:20.700 --> 01:58:22.700]  Your electronic lawyer thing
[01:58:22.700 --> 01:58:27.700]  I'm thinking about it from an IT perspective
[01:58:27.700 --> 01:58:30.700]  I'd like to refine it
[01:58:30.700 --> 01:58:32.700]  And man, Randy
[01:58:32.700 --> 01:58:35.700]  I mean, man, if I can get a hold of you
[01:58:35.700 --> 01:58:37.700]  And we can work together
[01:58:37.700 --> 01:58:40.700]  Wait, send me an email
[01:58:40.700 --> 01:58:41.700]  We're about to go to break
[01:58:41.700 --> 01:58:44.700]  Randy Kelton, we'll go to our radio
[01:58:44.700 --> 01:58:46.700]  We'll be right back
[01:58:46.700 --> 01:58:53.700]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[01:58:53.700 --> 01:58:55.700]  Yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.700 --> 01:58:57.700]  Because they struggle to understand it
[01:58:57.700 --> 01:58:59.700]  Some new translations try to help
[01:58:59.700 --> 01:59:01.700]  By simplifying the text
[01:59:01.700 --> 01:59:03.700]  But in the process can compromise
[01:59:03.700 --> 01:59:05.700]  The profound meaning of the Scripture
[01:59:05.700 --> 01:59:08.700]  Enter the recovery version
[01:59:08.700 --> 01:59:10.700]  First, this new translation
[01:59:10.700 --> 01:59:12.700]  Is extremely faithful and accurate
[01:59:12.700 --> 01:59:14.700]  But the real story is the more than
[01:59:14.700 --> 01:59:17.700]  9,000 explanatory footnotes
[01:59:17.700 --> 01:59:19.700]  Difficult and profound passages
[01:59:19.700 --> 01:59:21.700]  Are opened up in a marvelous way
[01:59:21.700 --> 01:59:24.700]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[01:59:24.700 --> 01:59:27.700]  Beyond which you've ever experienced before
[01:59:27.700 --> 01:59:29.700]  Bibles for America would like to give you
[01:59:29.700 --> 01:59:32.700]  A free recovery version simply for the asking
[01:59:32.700 --> 01:59:35.700]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible
[01:59:35.700 --> 01:59:38.700]  Is yours just by calling us toll-free
[01:59:38.700 --> 01:59:43.700]  At 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.700 --> 01:59:47.700]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[01:59:47.700 --> 02:00:14.700]  That's freestudybible.com