[00:00.000 --> 00:06.480]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns.
[00:06.480 --> 00:12.560]  Markets for Monday, 21 January 2019 Open with precious metals, gold at $1,277.74
[00:12.560 --> 00:19.240]  an ounce, silver $15.22 an ounce, copper $2.68 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $53.80
[00:19.240 --> 00:27.240]  a barrel, Brent crude $62.70 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, bitcoin $3,579.35,
[00:27.240 --> 00:36.240]  triple XRP $0.32, ethereum $117.88, and bitcoin cash $123.39 a crypto coin.
[00:40.240 --> 00:45.520]  Today in History, the year 1525, the Swiss Anabaptist movement is founded when Conrad
[00:45.520 --> 00:50.880]  Grebel, Felix Manns, George Blorock, and about a dozen others baptize each other in the home
[00:50.880 --> 00:54.720]  of Manns' mother in Zurich, the rediscovery of adult baptism.
[00:54.720 --> 01:02.160]  In recent news, Texas craft breweries are challenging a Texas law which bars customers
[01:02.160 --> 01:03.680]  from taking beer to go.
[01:03.680 --> 01:07.400]  State law emphasizes that customers are allowed to take wine or distilled spirits home when
[01:07.400 --> 01:12.000]  visiting in winery or distillery, but somehow the same privilege does not apply to breweries.
[01:12.000 --> 01:15.520]  If that doesn't seem unfair enough, it turns out Texas is the only state where this nuanced
[01:15.520 --> 01:17.320]  regulation is still in effect.
[01:17.320 --> 01:22.520]  With the number of craft breweries in Texas exploding from 59 to more than 250 since 2011,
[01:22.520 --> 01:26.200]  it seems pressure to change these blue law era rules is brewing.
[01:26.200 --> 01:29.720]  Two beer to go bills have been submitted at the state legislators so far along with the
[01:29.720 --> 01:35.720]  craft beer lobby working with lawmakers to change the current laws.
[01:35.720 --> 01:40.120]  A BuzzFeed News article published on their website last Thursday written by Jason Leopold
[01:40.120 --> 01:44.280]  and Anthony Cormier claimed that prosecutors had evidence that President Trump told Michael
[01:44.280 --> 01:48.880]  Cohen, Trump's former attorney, to light a congress about his proposed office tower project
[01:48.880 --> 01:51.040]  in Moscow in 2016.
[01:51.040 --> 01:55.120]  The article turned out to be a huge failure in investigative journalism and yet another
[01:55.120 --> 01:58.520]  example of fake news for the sake of undermining the president.
[01:58.520 --> 02:03.000]  A statement by Robert Mueller's office on Friday said that, quote, the BuzzFeed's description
[02:03.000 --> 02:07.560]  of specific statements to the special counsel's office in characterization of documents and
[02:07.560 --> 02:11.880]  testimony obtained by the office regarding Michael Cohen's congressional testimony are
[02:11.880 --> 02:13.280]  not accurate.
[02:13.280 --> 02:17.640]  Robert Mueller is the former FBI director who is now a special counsel for the United States
[02:17.640 --> 02:22.080]  Department of Justice who has been investigating Russian interference in the 2016 United States
[02:22.080 --> 02:27.840]  election and related matters by appointment in 2017 by then Deputy Attorney General Rod
[02:27.840 --> 02:28.840]  Rosenstein.
[02:28.840 --> 02:33.360]  In response to Mueller's office, editor Ben Smith said that BuzzFeed stood by his story
[02:33.360 --> 02:36.920]  urging Mueller to, quote, make clear what he's disputing.
[02:36.920 --> 02:40.640]  Speaking to reporters on Saturday, the president said that, quote, I think that the BuzzFeed
[02:40.640 --> 02:42.800]  piece was a disgrace to our country.
[02:42.800 --> 02:47.320]  It was a disgrace to journalism and I think also the coverage by the mainstream media was
[02:47.320 --> 02:51.960]  disgraceful and I think it's going to take a long time for the mainstream media to recover
[02:51.960 --> 02:52.960]  its credibility.
[02:52.960 --> 03:22.800]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for January 21st, 2019.
[03:22.800 --> 03:49.480]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host
[03:49.480 --> 03:50.480]  Eddie Craig.
[03:50.480 --> 03:59.480]  Today is January 21st, 2019, yes we are live tonight, we are not MRX.
[03:59.480 --> 04:07.880]  Now I want to share some, a quote that I considered words of wisdom in America today, okay.
[04:07.880 --> 04:12.800]  See, I don't know how many of you will be familiar with this and if you're not then
[04:12.800 --> 04:18.000]  you'll want to read up on the gentleman a little bit and read some of his stuff.
[04:18.000 --> 04:25.480]  The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
[04:25.480 --> 04:33.040]  If you try it you will be lonely often and sometimes frightened but no price is too high
[04:33.040 --> 04:36.520]  to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
[04:36.520 --> 04:46.360]  Now that's a quote by Frederick Nietzsche and nowhere is that quote more in danger than
[04:46.360 --> 04:50.040]  in today's America in my opinion.
[04:50.040 --> 04:57.160]  And the reason for that is because everybody is more willing to follow the crowd to avoid
[04:57.160 --> 05:04.480]  being ridiculed or thought to be something they're not or to be called something they're
[05:04.480 --> 05:13.600]  not to avoid controversy, to avoid conflict, to appear to fit in.
[05:13.600 --> 05:23.000]  But that brings us to another quote as well, a time is coming when people will go mad and
[05:23.000 --> 05:30.000]  when they see someone who is not mad they will mock him saying, you are mad, you are
[05:30.000 --> 05:33.880]  not like us.
[05:33.880 --> 05:42.580]  That is St. Anthony the Great, folks if you can't look around and see both of these pieces
[05:42.580 --> 05:49.920]  of wisdom in play in every interaction that's going on in America today then you're not
[05:49.920 --> 05:57.680]  really looking because the world as we know it has gone completely topsy-turvy.
[05:57.680 --> 06:00.680]  Of that there is no question.
[06:00.680 --> 06:11.480]  Now you can blame it or assess it on any basis you want but the fact remains that the further
[06:11.480 --> 06:22.720]  we get from the mindset we've held for decades in this country about certain things the worse
[06:22.720 --> 06:24.640]  things become.
[06:24.640 --> 06:29.720]  Now to ease their own on how that pans out for them but I'm just saying that when you
[06:29.720 --> 06:36.980]  look at the reality of things the more liberal we become in our ways and means of dealing
[06:36.980 --> 06:45.760]  with things from our old conservative methods and means the more out of whack things become
[06:45.760 --> 06:53.400]  and there is no question that's happening, there just isn't and if you don't have a question
[06:53.400 --> 06:59.600]  about what's happening then again you're more asleep than anybody I've ever seen before
[06:59.600 --> 07:08.040]  because things are definitely not as they should be as far as people understanding people,
[07:08.040 --> 07:14.000]  caring about people, wanting to do the right thing, having morals, having ethics, caring
[07:14.000 --> 07:19.720]  about what someone other than themselves has to say or how they want to do things or how
[07:19.720 --> 07:24.400]  they want to live their life.
[07:24.400 --> 07:28.840]  Everybody thinks they have a right to force others to accept what they do and how they
[07:28.840 --> 07:34.720]  do it while decrying anything that they want to hold dear to themselves as being against
[07:34.720 --> 07:41.600]  the norm or racist or some other politically correct nomenclature about why you're wrong
[07:41.600 --> 07:47.120]  and they're right and their new way of doing things has to be to accept the norm for everybody
[07:47.120 --> 07:50.880]  or it's not good enough.
[07:50.880 --> 08:02.080]  We got a real problem and we're going to crumble under its weight real soon is my greatest
[08:02.080 --> 08:05.000]  fear.
[08:05.000 --> 08:11.400]  We have given up on trying to find what's true, what's right, what's moral, what's ethical
[08:11.400 --> 08:15.760]  and I know the question is always out there by whose ethics, by whose morals.
[08:15.760 --> 08:26.760]  The ethics and morals which I've always lived by, I don't see why they wouldn't be acceptably
[08:26.760 --> 08:33.520]  the norm for everyone no matter what your religion, what your political views, nothing.
[08:33.520 --> 08:39.400]  These are the ones that I believe every person should recognize as fundamental and true and
[08:39.400 --> 08:49.080]  that is that we all have the right to do and be anything we want especially in our privacy
[08:49.080 --> 08:57.840]  but we do not have the right to force what we want or what we do upon others whether
[08:57.840 --> 09:05.760]  it be to make them accept it, recognize it or join in it, doesn't matter.
[09:05.760 --> 09:10.280]  I can't harm you, you can't harm me, I can't tell you what to do, you can't tell me what
[09:10.280 --> 09:16.280]  to do but we have a responsibility to act morally and ethically in relation to each
[09:16.280 --> 09:23.320]  other to better our lives and not make them worse and to harm anyone else's person's
[09:23.320 --> 09:33.760]  rights or property in those actions period and we have strayed so far from that mindset
[09:33.760 --> 09:42.120]  these days it's not even funny and nowhere is that more true than in those that are employed
[09:42.120 --> 09:48.120]  as by government where they now see themselves as the ultimate authority in every regard
[09:48.120 --> 09:53.280]  to do anything that they feel they want to do and we as the people must swallow and take
[09:53.280 --> 09:56.080]  it whether we agree with it or not.
[09:56.080 --> 10:01.400]  The political power that's inherent in us now doesn't belong to us but only to them
[10:01.400 --> 10:06.800]  is the way this is turning out and the way it's being used and abused and ruled upon
[10:06.800 --> 10:11.560]  by those who have it.
[10:11.560 --> 10:19.320]  We are not long for peace in the United States of America, not unless we're just going to
[10:19.320 --> 10:27.800]  go with a whimper and let things continue to erode and blow up in our face anyway because
[10:27.800 --> 10:31.080]  then it's just a matter of just staying right where we're at and doing what we're doing
[10:31.080 --> 10:36.400]  and it'll come whether we want it or not.
[10:36.400 --> 10:40.360]  But if we are going to be free men and women, if we are going to live our lives without
[10:40.360 --> 10:47.360]  rulers and we are going to do what we were intended to do when this country was founded
[10:47.360 --> 10:52.000]  then we have a real situation brewing here and it's going to be a violent one because
[10:52.000 --> 10:59.440]  there is no way to get rid of those who have got their hands on the power in a peaceable
[10:59.440 --> 11:03.880]  fashion because it doesn't matter what you say to them, it doesn't matter how you vote
[11:03.880 --> 11:09.040]  for them because you don't control the outcome of any of it.
[11:09.040 --> 11:14.760]  Not in their minds and not in the way things are constructed to work to ensure that their
[11:14.760 --> 11:17.920]  power remains intact no matter where they are.
[11:17.920 --> 11:21.040]  Why do you think these politicians never leave politics?
[11:21.040 --> 11:26.520]  They may move from one office to another, one job to another, one section of government
[11:26.520 --> 11:32.040]  to another but they're living off of us, they are nothing but parasitic ticks in the truest
[11:32.040 --> 11:38.280]  sense of the word and they don't want to be taken off the dog so to speak.
[11:38.280 --> 11:44.560]  They don't want to be burned loose with a match or smothered with Vaseline to get them
[11:44.560 --> 11:45.560]  to let go.
[11:45.560 --> 11:50.600]  No, they want you to think that they belong there and that you couldn't function if they
[11:50.600 --> 11:56.080]  weren't there.
[11:56.080 --> 12:04.240]  And that is where we have failed ourselves in recognizing that we don't need them to
[12:04.240 --> 12:05.700]  live our lives.
[12:05.700 --> 12:10.160]  We don't need them doing the majority of the things they're doing.
[12:10.160 --> 12:16.080]  We shouldn't want them doing the majority of the things they're doing but instead we
[12:16.080 --> 12:23.560]  keep looking for simple solutions that someone else needs to take care of instead of each
[12:23.560 --> 12:27.680]  of us doing what we need to do to handle our own business.
[12:27.680 --> 12:33.040]  We always fall into the trap of there ought to be a law, there ought to be a rule, there
[12:33.040 --> 12:38.800]  ought to be someone who, as long as someone isn't me, to take responsibility for and be
[12:38.800 --> 12:50.520]  responsible for making somebody do this or somebody not do that and blah, blah, blah.
[12:50.520 --> 12:54.240]  And we thought we could improve system as white men when we came over here and conquered
[12:54.240 --> 12:56.600]  the Indians way of life, right?
[12:56.600 --> 13:00.760]  They hunted, they fished, they had a family, they enjoyed their downtime.
[13:00.760 --> 13:07.040]  Yeah, they fought and they had their own battles but they never waged a war until it was against
[13:07.040 --> 13:11.800]  us for survival.
[13:11.800 --> 13:17.640]  They had battles, they had skirmishes but they didn't have wars.
[13:17.640 --> 13:28.320]  They didn't go out of their way just to subjugate their fellow men and yet here we are in every
[13:28.320 --> 13:35.560]  single way thinking that all this is going to fix itself if we just stick our head in
[13:35.560 --> 13:45.240]  the sand long enough and look the other way and that just isn't going to happen.
[13:45.240 --> 13:50.240]  What have you done to prepare yourself out there for when things get really bad?
[13:50.240 --> 13:55.840]  And they're going to get really bad, of that I'm fairly certain.
[13:55.840 --> 14:00.880]  That's not going to change any time soon as to how that's going to play out.
[14:00.880 --> 14:02.480]  So what have you done to prepare for it?
[14:02.480 --> 14:03.920]  How are you prepared for it?
[14:03.920 --> 14:09.680]  Where are you living and what are you going to do with it when it comes?
[14:09.680 --> 14:13.080]  Know what seems to be thinking about that, everyone seems to be thinking that if they
[14:13.080 --> 14:19.000]  just wait long enough everything will fix itself and life will go on.
[14:19.000 --> 14:24.480]  I don't think that's going to be the way this works at all.
[14:24.480 --> 14:29.040]  I think we're going to have problems bigger than the 40 years in the desert if you go by
[14:29.040 --> 14:34.240]  biblical prophecy on things.
[14:34.240 --> 14:38.840]  I think it's going to be a lot worse.
[14:38.840 --> 14:43.640]  The only question is how much?
[14:43.640 --> 14:46.920]  And who's going to live through it and who's not?
[14:46.920 --> 14:50.680]  Who's going to have something to show for it and who's not?
[14:50.680 --> 14:55.840]  Because I guarantee you when that time comes you're not going to be able to stand there
[14:55.840 --> 15:01.000]  and tell somebody that they're not behaving the way you want them to.
[15:01.000 --> 15:06.120]  You're not going to be able to sit up there and have somebody else able to act on your
[15:06.120 --> 15:10.520]  behalf to make somebody accept something the way you want them to accept it whether they
[15:10.520 --> 15:13.040]  agree with it or not.
[15:13.040 --> 15:19.600]  That time is coming to a close if things don't change and it's coming to a close if things
[15:19.600 --> 15:24.640]  do change because all those that are helping you with it now are going to be the first
[15:24.640 --> 15:29.560]  ones to turn on you and make you submit to them when it's all said and done because you're
[15:29.560 --> 15:37.120]  not going to be one of those that are fighting back.
[15:37.120 --> 15:42.720]  Where will you be when they finally come to take the last vestige of freedom that you
[15:42.720 --> 15:46.680]  have?
[15:46.680 --> 15:56.960]  How will you resist if you will resist or will you go peacefully into that good night?
[15:56.960 --> 16:02.040]  Because those of you that they don't have a use for, they're not going to keep you around,
[16:02.040 --> 16:04.520]  they're not going to feed you, they're not going to clothe you, they're not going to
[16:04.520 --> 16:09.120]  shelter you, they're going to get rid of you.
[16:09.120 --> 16:14.080]  We've seen what people around the world are capable of, digging trenches, shooting people
[16:14.080 --> 16:17.280]  in the back of the head and letting them fall in and covering them right back up and moving
[16:17.280 --> 16:19.720]  to the next one.
[16:19.720 --> 16:23.920]  If you think this government or any other government on the planet is not still in a
[16:23.920 --> 16:28.120]  place where they're perfectly willing to do that, then you are sorely out of touch with
[16:28.120 --> 16:32.640]  the reality.
[16:32.640 --> 16:37.800]  The only thing that stopped them thus far is the fact that they don't yet control the
[16:37.800 --> 16:39.760]  guns.
[16:39.760 --> 16:46.720]  They don't have that monopoly yet, but they are certainly working to get it.
[16:46.720 --> 16:50.720]  And the thing is, is you keep putting those same people back in the same office to keep
[16:50.720 --> 16:55.040]  doing the same thing until one of these days they're going to unite together in a way where
[16:55.040 --> 16:57.040]  they absolutely succeed.
[16:57.040 --> 17:00.040]  Y'all hang on, we'll be right back.
[17:00.040 --> 17:04.360]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[17:04.360 --> 17:07.920]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[17:07.920 --> 17:12.240]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:12.240 --> 17:15.080]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to
[17:15.080 --> 17:19.320]  act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to do process of law.
[17:19.320 --> 17:23.320]  Courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our
[17:23.320 --> 17:24.320]  rights through due process.
[17:24.320 --> 17:28.520]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[17:28.520 --> 17:32.280]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[17:32.280 --> 17:34.360]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.360 --> 17:38.680]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[17:38.680 --> 17:40.000]  ordering your copy today.
[17:40.000 --> 17:43.360]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[17:43.360 --> 17:47.000]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[17:47.000 --> 17:50.080]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[17:50.080 --> 17:54.080]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[17:54.080 --> 18:00.600]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.600 --> 18:05.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.920 --> 18:09.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.680]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.680 --> 18:14.680]  can win two.
[18:14.680 --> 18:19.640]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.640 --> 18:20.640]  civil rights statutes.
[18:20.640 --> 18:25.960]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and
[18:25.960 --> 18:30.400]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial
[18:30.400 --> 18:34.160]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.160 --> 18:39.280]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.280 --> 18:41.400]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.400 --> 18:46.960]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[18:46.960 --> 18:49.960]  or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.960 --> 18:57.640]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.640 --> 19:04.640]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:04.640 --> 19:11.640]  at yahoo.com.
[19:34.640 --> 20:02.040]  All right folks, we are back.
[20:02.040 --> 20:04.720]  This is rule of law radio.
[20:04.720 --> 20:10.560]  Calling number is 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line and have an issue
[20:10.560 --> 20:11.560]  to talk about.
[20:11.560 --> 20:14.840]  Phone lines are open if you want to call and get in line.
[20:14.840 --> 20:19.240]  Right now we have a couple of callers up on the board, so let's start with Michael in
[20:19.240 --> 20:20.240]  Ohio.
[20:20.240 --> 20:22.240]  Michael, what can we do for you?
[20:22.240 --> 20:25.320]  Hello, can you hear me?
[20:25.320 --> 20:27.320]  I can hear you.
[20:27.320 --> 20:37.320]  Okay, I just had a couple quick questions in regards to the DMV laws here in Ohio.
[20:37.320 --> 20:43.440]  Let's talk about the motor vehicle definitions.
[20:43.440 --> 20:50.640]  I don't understand how you can really get away from being under the rule of a DMV, it
[20:50.640 --> 20:51.640]  seems like.
[20:51.640 --> 20:57.840]  Well, first off, when the law that created the DMV was enacted, what was the subject
[20:57.840 --> 21:04.800]  matter purpose the legislature said the DMV was there for?
[21:04.800 --> 21:07.280]  I'm honestly behind the able now.
[21:07.280 --> 21:10.880]  Okay, well that's the first thing you have to know because you're not going to create
[21:10.880 --> 21:15.800]  a bunch of regulatory laws without first creating the agency that's meant to regulate and control
[21:15.800 --> 21:17.800]  those laws, right?
[21:17.800 --> 21:19.280]  Correct, yeah.
[21:19.280 --> 21:23.120]  Because the Ohio Constitutes, you contain a single subject matter clause requirement
[21:23.120 --> 21:30.360]  for every piece of legislation that goes through the legislature?
[21:30.360 --> 21:36.240]  To be honest, you're speaking about things that I should definitely be researching.
[21:36.240 --> 21:39.080]  I haven't headed in that direction, I've just been.
[21:39.080 --> 21:42.120]  Well, you have to because how are you going?
[21:42.120 --> 21:46.560]  Okay, let me back up here for a second and let me explain to you why you're having a
[21:46.560 --> 21:54.040]  problem understanding and why your first comment is what's wrong with your perception, okay?
[21:54.040 --> 21:56.800]  And don't take this as something, I'm not meaning it that way, I'm just trying to help
[21:56.800 --> 22:03.160]  you understand how this actually plays out versus how they're telling you it works, alright?
[22:03.160 --> 22:08.640]  You have a state constitution, whatever article it is that establishes your legislature in
[22:08.640 --> 22:16.400]  your state's constitution, it says specifically how that legislature must create law, okay?
[22:16.400 --> 22:18.400]  Okay.
[22:18.400 --> 22:24.760]  So that's the very first thing you need to study and understand in depth and completely.
[22:24.760 --> 22:32.040]  Now once you understand how the legislature is required to create law, then you also have
[22:32.040 --> 22:38.160]  to understand what the Bill of Rights of your specific constitution says, okay?
[22:38.160 --> 22:43.640]  And you have to understand that no matter how the legislature uses its power delegated
[22:43.640 --> 22:49.360]  within the constitution to make laws, they cannot do it in a way that violates that same
[22:49.360 --> 22:54.720]  constitution's Bill of Rights, okay?
[22:54.720 --> 22:55.720]  So understand how it makes laws.
[22:55.720 --> 23:02.920]  You cannot delegate a power to them to violate the collective rights of everyone else that
[23:02.920 --> 23:08.240]  are protected by that constitution.
[23:08.240 --> 23:12.840]  That's like me and five of your neighbors voting to evict you from the home that you
[23:12.840 --> 23:23.080]  paid for five years ago in cash because we don't like the color you painted it.
[23:23.080 --> 23:28.000]  We can't give each other that power, we collectively don't have that power, doesn't matter whether
[23:28.000 --> 23:31.520]  you voted for us to have it or not, we don't have it.
[23:31.520 --> 23:32.520]  Why?
[23:32.520 --> 23:34.080]  Because you don't have it.
[23:34.080 --> 23:41.120]  You cannot give us the power that we can exercise if you never had it, okay?
[23:41.120 --> 23:42.120]  Okay.
[23:42.120 --> 23:43.120]  All right.
[23:43.120 --> 23:48.000]  So, which came first, the chicken or the egg?
[23:48.000 --> 23:51.680]  This is the question you've got to answer.
[23:51.680 --> 23:58.920]  Automobiles came into existence in the U.S. in the late 1800s, okay?
[23:58.920 --> 24:07.560]  Not the early 1900s, the late 1800s, last 30 years or so and there were motor vehicles
[24:07.560 --> 24:12.960]  per se, motor cars, before even that time.
[24:12.960 --> 24:22.160]  But they weren't really ubiquitous in America until 1870 plus, okay?
[24:22.160 --> 24:24.480]  And that's when they became a big thing for a lot of folks.
[24:24.480 --> 24:27.760]  Those who could afford them started getting into them, they got motorcycles, they got
[24:27.760 --> 24:31.720]  the old Model T buggies, blah, blah, blah, all right, as soon as they started getting
[24:31.720 --> 24:36.520]  up in those types of later models.
[24:36.520 --> 24:43.240]  But the fact of the matter is, the first laws regulating them did not appear until the teens
[24:43.240 --> 24:45.760]  of the 1900s, okay?
[24:45.760 --> 24:46.760]  Right.
[24:46.760 --> 24:47.760]  Right.
[24:47.760 --> 24:55.040]  Now, every Constitution I'm aware of contains a provision on retroactive law, okay?
[24:55.040 --> 25:01.680]  And again, the Bill of Rights being what it is, is not something granted to you by your
[25:01.680 --> 25:02.680]  Constitution.
[25:02.680 --> 25:07.560]  It is not the source of your rights, okay?
[25:07.560 --> 25:11.160]  Your rights predate every state's Constitution.
[25:11.160 --> 25:12.160]  They're inherent.
[25:12.160 --> 25:13.160]  They're fundamental.
[25:13.160 --> 25:14.240]  You're born with them.
[25:14.240 --> 25:20.480]  So that means everyone before you was born with those same rights, hence before any Constitution
[25:20.480 --> 25:25.160]  existed or any forms of American government existed, right?
[25:25.160 --> 25:26.160]  Right.
[25:26.160 --> 25:27.160]  Okay.
[25:27.160 --> 25:32.840]  So, how did people get around from place to place before there were motorcars?
[25:32.840 --> 25:34.280]  Well, there were various ways.
[25:34.280 --> 25:41.160]  They walked, they had wagons, they had chariots, they had animals, and if they felt like if
[25:41.160 --> 25:44.000]  they could barrel roll around if they thought they could get away with it, you know, and
[25:44.000 --> 25:45.160]  get where they were going.
[25:45.160 --> 25:46.160]  Right.
[25:46.160 --> 25:48.680]  Were licenses of permits required then?
[25:48.680 --> 25:49.680]  No.
[25:49.680 --> 25:51.680]  No, okay.
[25:51.680 --> 25:52.680]  Now...
[25:52.680 --> 25:59.600]  Yeah, so that's what I'm trying to understand, I mean, they've always had the right to movement.
[25:59.600 --> 26:00.600]  Correct.
[26:00.600 --> 26:02.600]  It's called the right to local motion.
[26:02.600 --> 26:03.600]  Okay.
[26:03.600 --> 26:07.400]  We have the right to move about freely by whatever means of transportation exist during the
[26:07.400 --> 26:10.600]  day or any means of local motion that exist during the day.
[26:10.600 --> 26:16.400]  Now, here's the thing.
[26:16.400 --> 26:21.640]  Do changes in the law revoke a constitutionally protected right?
[26:21.640 --> 26:22.640]  No.
[26:22.640 --> 26:23.640]  Absolutely.
[26:23.640 --> 26:26.160]  Unless you're intentionally accidentally falling underneath...
[26:26.160 --> 26:30.640]  Well, actually, I don't find anywhere where there's an accident to it.
[26:30.640 --> 26:34.640]  I don't find anything in the constitution that allows a government to revoke a fundamental
[26:34.640 --> 26:38.680]  right from an individual for all eternity simply because they're convicted of some sort
[26:38.680 --> 26:40.160]  of crime, yet they do it.
[26:40.160 --> 26:41.160]  Right.
[26:41.160 --> 26:42.160]  Exactly.
[26:42.160 --> 26:43.160]  Okay.
[26:43.160 --> 26:45.200]  But I don't see anywhere without authority as one delegated to government to remove
[26:45.200 --> 26:50.360]  an inherent right permanently from an individual once they have paid their debt to society
[26:50.360 --> 26:52.600]  for whatever crime they committed before.
[26:52.600 --> 26:53.600]  Right.
[26:53.600 --> 26:54.600]  Okay?
[26:54.600 --> 26:55.600]  Right.
[26:55.600 --> 26:57.920]  But again, that's a different issue from what we're talking about here.
[26:57.920 --> 27:05.280]  The point being that people owned motor cars before there were regulatory laws for them.
[27:05.280 --> 27:06.280]  Okay?
[27:06.280 --> 27:11.320]  So, the government could not turn around and make a regulatory law that deprived people
[27:11.320 --> 27:15.400]  of the rightful use of the property they had acquired before that law was enacted.
[27:15.400 --> 27:16.400]  Right?
[27:16.400 --> 27:17.400]  Right.
[27:17.400 --> 27:23.160]  And if the means of that property was to exercise a fundamentally protected right to locomotion
[27:23.160 --> 27:28.720]  in the first place, then legislation could not readily be created that would convert
[27:28.720 --> 27:30.880]  that right into a privilege either.
[27:30.880 --> 27:31.880]  Right?
[27:31.880 --> 27:32.880]  Exactly.
[27:32.880 --> 27:33.880]  Okay.
[27:33.880 --> 27:39.080]  So, that's where the courts came down to the determination of use being the key factor
[27:39.080 --> 27:40.080]  here.
[27:40.080 --> 27:47.560]  Excuse me, what use was the motorized device being put?
[27:47.560 --> 27:50.120]  And here's the way it works.
[27:50.120 --> 27:54.440]  When you look at how it's written into law, every time they define a term or phrase in
[27:54.440 --> 27:59.560]  law, then it's 100% guarantee the term or phrase is not being used as it is in the common
[27:59.560 --> 28:01.040]  English language.
[28:01.040 --> 28:05.560]  If it were, there would have been no need for them to create a definition for it in
[28:05.560 --> 28:07.560]  the law itself.
[28:07.560 --> 28:09.560]  Correct?
[28:09.560 --> 28:14.800]  Trust me, that's correct, okay?
[28:14.800 --> 28:19.960]  Because their own rules of construction state that if the law does not provide the definition,
[28:19.960 --> 28:26.000]  then and only then can they start going backwards to other law, other means like words in terms
[28:26.000 --> 28:28.480]  of art, or common English.
[28:28.480 --> 28:33.520]  There's a hierarchy they must follow in order to supply a definition that the law may or
[28:33.520 --> 28:35.800]  may not supply itself.
[28:35.800 --> 28:36.800]  Okay?
[28:36.800 --> 28:37.800]  Right.
[28:37.800 --> 28:42.280]  So, here's the way the rules work.
[28:42.280 --> 28:50.000]  Every automobile is capable of being used as a motor vehicle.
[28:50.000 --> 28:54.560]  But not every motor vehicle is an automobile.
[28:54.560 --> 28:57.680]  I understand that, yeah.
[28:57.680 --> 28:58.680]  Okay?
[28:58.680 --> 28:59.680]  Yeah.
[28:59.680 --> 29:07.360]  So, just because something can be used for a specific purpose, the question now is,
[29:07.360 --> 29:12.720]  is it being used for that specific purpose or not?
[29:12.720 --> 29:21.080]  If the answer is yes, then the regulatory rules that call it a motor vehicle, kick in.
[29:21.080 --> 29:22.080]  Okay?
[29:22.080 --> 29:23.080]  Yeah.
[29:23.080 --> 29:27.880]  And that the person behind the wheel is a driver or an operator, kick in.
[29:27.880 --> 29:34.080]  But if it is not being used for the purpose regulated by that single subject matter requirement
[29:34.080 --> 29:41.160]  of your Constitution, then the automobile in question is not a motor vehicle.
[29:41.160 --> 29:45.160]  And the person behind the wheel is not a driver or an operator.
[29:45.160 --> 29:52.840]  In which case, neither the automobile nor the person are subject to the DMV's regulatory
[29:52.840 --> 29:55.760]  code or the DMV's authority.
[29:55.760 --> 30:01.600]  See how that works?
[30:01.600 --> 30:04.480]  Japan is number one in life expectancy, right?
[30:04.480 --> 30:06.000]  Well, maybe not.
[30:06.000 --> 30:10.200]  Recent discoveries have people wondering if those famous 100-year-old Japanese aren't
[30:10.200 --> 30:11.200]  just a scam.
[30:11.200 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albright, back with the bizarre details next.
[30:16.000 --> 30:17.720]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.720 --> 30:21.320]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.320 --> 30:26.320]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.320 --> 30:27.840]  So protect your rights.
[30:27.840 --> 30:31.960]  Stay known to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.960 --> 30:34.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:34.120 --> 30:39.760]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:39.760 --> 30:41.440]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.440 --> 30:44.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.920 --> 30:48.440]  For Japanese investigators, it was a gruesome discovery.
[30:48.440 --> 30:53.000]  The bones of an elderly woman thought to be alive were found in a backpack belonging
[30:53.000 --> 30:54.000]  to her son.
[30:54.000 --> 30:58.200]  Why had he stashed his mother's remains instead of giving her a decent burial?
[30:58.200 --> 31:01.800]  Well, the sordid truth was more about money than gruesomeness.
[31:01.800 --> 31:06.680]  As it happens, he never reported his mother's death back in 2001 and had been collecting
[31:06.680 --> 31:08.920]  her benefits ever since.
[31:08.920 --> 31:14.320]  The discovery is just one of many suggesting the Japanese may not live as long as we thought.
[31:14.320 --> 31:20.280]  In a nationwide search, more than 200,000 so-called centenarians or 100-year-olds have turned
[31:20.280 --> 31:22.080]  up to be dead or missing.
[31:22.080 --> 31:31.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.520 --> 31:36.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.920 --> 31:39.080]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:39.080 --> 31:43.960]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.960 --> 31:48.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[31:48.000 --> 31:49.400]  force responders have bled.
[31:49.400 --> 31:50.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.880 --> 31:51.880]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.880 --> 31:52.880]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[31:52.880 --> 31:53.880]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.880 --> 31:55.880]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[31:55.880 --> 31:58.520]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.520 --> 32:01.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.200 --> 32:04.120]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:04.120 --> 32:07.080]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:07.080 --> 32:10.760]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[32:10.760 --> 32:11.760]  them to pay for it.
[32:11.760 --> 32:15.360]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[32:15.360 --> 32:19.160]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[32:19.160 --> 32:24.400]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense, and we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus
[32:24.400 --> 32:27.520]  member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[32:27.520 --> 32:31.880]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[32:31.880 --> 32:32.960]  first time.
[32:32.960 --> 32:41.600]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show, and get $100 off,
[32:41.600 --> 32:46.240]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:46.240 --> 32:51.360]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:51.360 --> 32:57.400]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:57.400 --> 32:59.360]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:59.360 --> 33:25.360]  I may not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[33:25.360 --> 33:32.360]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[33:55.360 --> 33:58.800]  All right folks, we are back.
[33:58.800 --> 34:03.360]  This is Rural Law Radio, and we are still talking to Michael in Ohio.
[34:03.360 --> 34:07.800]  All right, Michael, sorry the music cut us off, I didn't even hear it coming, so anyhow,
[34:07.800 --> 34:08.800]  back to where we were.
[34:08.800 --> 34:13.320]  Yeah, I definitely, I understand exactly where you're coming from with the motor vehicles
[34:13.320 --> 34:18.720]  and being a driver and operator, and it's all about intended use case, whether or not
[34:18.720 --> 34:23.640]  you're being a motor carrier or whether or not you're using a automobile as your personal
[34:23.640 --> 34:26.080]  conveyance from point A to point B.
[34:26.080 --> 34:32.360]  Right, and the way that the courts and the attorneys tend to obfuscate this issue is
[34:32.360 --> 34:37.920]  they keep switching back to the legal terminology of motor vehicle, which is when the rules
[34:37.920 --> 34:45.640]  apply without providing even one iota of factual evidence as to its use.
[34:45.640 --> 34:46.640]  Right.
[34:46.640 --> 34:52.520]  There's where they get you in court on a charge of violating one of those codes every
[34:52.520 --> 35:01.080]  single time is they are negating their own requirement to state the essential element
[35:01.080 --> 35:05.640]  of any such charge, and that element is use.
[35:05.640 --> 35:09.840]  Under the subject matter, the legislature declared that law applicable to.
[35:09.840 --> 35:16.360]  And I'm just wondering, so many times, all these people that are getting the charges
[35:16.360 --> 35:20.480]  slapped on them for all these things, and they're trying it, we're just getting wrapped
[35:20.480 --> 35:27.000]  up in the association with the commercial use, and it's just a cultural norm at this
[35:27.000 --> 35:32.760]  point where, you know, anyways, so I'm just trying to figure out how it's so.
[35:32.760 --> 35:36.400]  They're not denying the commercial use.
[35:36.400 --> 35:37.680]  That's the thing.
[35:37.680 --> 35:41.800]  No one's addressing that, or at least they're not addressing it properly.
[35:41.800 --> 35:45.360]  They're not citing your own law to back it up.
[35:45.360 --> 35:50.760]  They're trying to cite things that are not relevant to the specific facts of their case
[35:50.760 --> 35:55.160]  or controlling over the specific facts of their case.
[35:55.160 --> 35:59.720]  For instance, people that are always going to the definitions that are not in the statutes
[35:59.720 --> 36:04.440]  and sales instead of the ones the statute has, they're not going to the actual title
[36:04.440 --> 36:09.360]  of the original bill the legislature put into play that was signed by the governor
[36:09.360 --> 36:14.320]  where that single subject matter clause at the very top of the bill tells you that everything
[36:14.320 --> 36:19.920]  in this bill must relate to this single subject, and if that single subject does not apply,
[36:19.920 --> 36:22.920]  nothing in this bill can apply.
[36:22.920 --> 36:23.920]  Okay.
[36:23.920 --> 36:24.920]  Yeah.
[36:24.920 --> 36:25.920]  Okay.
[36:25.920 --> 36:34.200]  One other quick thing in regards to the B and VN, just whether or not that this ties
[36:34.200 --> 36:39.800]  into it or not, I've always wondered a lot, whether or not your certificate of title and
[36:39.800 --> 36:44.840]  that being given basically over to the B and VN then they give you a certificate of title,
[36:44.840 --> 36:49.120]  is that holding your vehicle somewhat?
[36:49.120 --> 36:53.080]  By registering it with them and turning that over, then you're telling them in advance
[36:53.080 --> 36:55.080]  it's for commercial use.
[36:55.080 --> 36:56.880]  That's exactly what you're doing.
[36:56.880 --> 37:01.360]  Basically, they have a hold on you, kind of a leg up on you anytime you go to court
[37:01.360 --> 37:05.240]  because you've already bought in the system.
[37:05.240 --> 37:10.160]  That's why you have to be very particular about the paperwork when you buy the car.
[37:10.160 --> 37:14.480]  Never ever let the dealer do the registration for you.
[37:14.480 --> 37:16.680]  Never let them do that.
[37:16.680 --> 37:19.400]  Never let the dealer do the tax title and license.
[37:19.400 --> 37:24.160]  Buy the car and then tell the dealer, I will go down and take care of the tax title and
[37:24.160 --> 37:30.760]  license myself because the moment you pay the tax title and license, you are registering
[37:30.760 --> 37:33.480]  it specifically for that commercial use.
[37:33.480 --> 37:36.920]  Now, here's the other caveat.
[37:36.920 --> 37:41.880]  Just because you registered it to be capable of being used, still does not mean that you
[37:41.880 --> 37:44.080]  are using it for that purpose.
[37:44.080 --> 37:45.080]  Right.
[37:45.080 --> 37:50.640]  So, again, it's like any other form of license and that's all a license plate is.
[37:50.640 --> 37:54.080]  A license plate is permission to use your car for that purpose.
[37:54.080 --> 37:58.520]  Just like a driver's license is permission for you to be employed for that purpose.
[37:58.520 --> 38:02.960]  Right, but all these things are kind of making it more of an uphill battle than it already
[38:02.960 --> 38:03.960]  is.
[38:03.960 --> 38:04.960]  Correct.
[38:04.960 --> 38:05.960]  It's an uphill battle and you're just...
[38:05.960 --> 38:06.960]  Correct.
[38:06.960 --> 38:11.640]  Everything in this system is based upon deception through perception.
[38:11.640 --> 38:17.440]  Exactly, and I heard you talk about before the whole thing with even having a Social
[38:17.440 --> 38:25.280]  Security number and your benefits that you pay into for so long.
[38:25.280 --> 38:30.120]  Anyways, I'm just saying as far as getting rid of some of these hurdles that are already
[38:30.120 --> 38:31.360]  making it harder than it should be.
[38:31.360 --> 38:35.200]  You have to understand the law as it applies in your state.
[38:35.200 --> 38:38.440]  That's what I had to do here to solve this riddle.
[38:38.440 --> 38:40.720]  I went through all the same rigmarole.
[38:40.720 --> 38:44.240]  Everybody else out there has tried without the legal training.
[38:44.240 --> 38:49.520]  I looked at all the patronage stuff, the mythical silver bullets that don't really exist.
[38:49.520 --> 38:52.920]  I went through all of that stuff, not actually using it.
[38:52.920 --> 38:57.600]  I had the good sense at least to try to verify it before I attempted to use it.
[38:57.600 --> 39:04.840]  I found all of these so-called silver bullets that everybody was toting as being the solution
[39:04.840 --> 39:05.840]  to everything.
[39:05.840 --> 39:11.320]  When I went to research them and dig into them deeper and deeper, I couldn't find anything
[39:11.320 --> 39:17.680]  but a dead end where the only source of this being useful is the person saying that it's
[39:17.680 --> 39:22.880]  useful because I can't find what they're saying this case says in the case.
[39:22.880 --> 39:28.880]  I can't find any court that's ever ruled that this is the case, at least not using that
[39:28.880 --> 39:32.480]  particular case citation as a reference, for instance.
[39:32.480 --> 39:36.760]  Most of the laws they're quoting, they're quoting either out of context or they're making
[39:36.760 --> 39:37.760]  them up.
[39:37.760 --> 39:38.760]  All right.
[39:38.760 --> 39:46.920]  I'll definitely look back into the origination with making the wolf in it.
[39:46.920 --> 39:52.560]  Do you have a law library close to you, like a state law library or a university law library?
[39:52.560 --> 39:55.240]  I don't know about university because I'm currently in university.
[39:55.240 --> 40:00.040]  I can look into that, but I'm about an hour away from the state capital.
[40:00.040 --> 40:04.200]  Are you saying university is city or university has in a college?
[40:04.200 --> 40:05.200]  College, sorry.
[40:05.200 --> 40:06.200]  Yeah.
[40:06.200 --> 40:13.040]  A college library generally has a law book section.
[40:13.040 --> 40:19.760]  If you're lucky enough that your town college is a federal book repository library, then
[40:19.760 --> 40:26.280]  you'll have every law book in there, like in my hometown, Stephen F. Austin, Stephen
[40:26.280 --> 40:33.600]  F. Austin is a book repository library, quiet access to everything.
[40:33.600 --> 40:39.120]  That's how I managed to go through and piece together all this stuff from the actual historical
[40:39.120 --> 40:40.120]  law.
[40:40.120 --> 40:41.760]  That's where you need to start.
[40:41.760 --> 40:47.480]  Go to an actual law library where the books are because the books contain codes that the
[40:47.480 --> 40:50.840]  online versions of the statutes do not.
[40:50.840 --> 40:57.600]  Those codes tell you how that section used to be numbered in a previous piece of legislation.
[40:57.600 --> 41:02.600]  Then you go to that book, and that book will show you how it was before that, and it allows
[41:02.600 --> 41:08.600]  you to backtrack it all the way to the very original first act.
[41:08.600 --> 41:13.960]  But besides reading what's in the statutes, you need to read the original legislative
[41:13.960 --> 41:15.680]  bill that was signed.
[41:15.680 --> 41:19.400]  It's called the enrolled bill.
[41:19.400 --> 41:23.120]  The enrolled bill is the one the governor signed into law.
[41:23.120 --> 41:28.840]  You need to read the caption of every bill that deals with that to see what the specific
[41:28.840 --> 41:35.120]  single subject matter is that that legislation had to apply to, and it cannot apply to anything
[41:35.120 --> 41:41.280]  outside of that single subject.
[41:41.280 --> 41:47.320]  Eventually you will find that when they re-codify these things into one big code or one big
[41:47.320 --> 41:54.160]  title, they do it in a single piece of legislation that will encompass all this multitude of
[41:54.160 --> 42:01.680]  generations of statutes under one now matching single subject.
[42:01.680 --> 42:08.480]  Once again, prove positive that even in prior history, the single subject always was relating
[42:08.480 --> 42:11.000]  to this.
[42:11.000 --> 42:16.960]  Here in Texas, in 1995, when they re-enacted the transportation code under the bill SB
[42:16.960 --> 42:24.160]  971, as a single piece of legislation, the legislature said that the single subject
[42:24.160 --> 42:31.000]  matter that every statute in that code must adhere to is transportation.
[42:31.000 --> 42:37.200]  Now, guess what term is not defined by Texas law in its singular form anywhere?
[42:37.200 --> 42:38.200]  Transportation.
[42:38.200 --> 42:43.520]  Transportation, bingo, which means it is being used in one of two ways.
[42:43.520 --> 42:49.440]  It's either being used in its common English meaning or it's being used as a term or word
[42:49.440 --> 42:51.160]  of art.
[42:51.160 --> 43:01.400]  Guess which one it's always used as first?
[43:01.400 --> 43:03.320]  Terminary art.
[43:03.320 --> 43:04.480]  Correct.
[43:04.480 --> 43:10.960]  It's always used as a term of art first, in which case Texas law under the Texas government
[43:10.960 --> 43:18.920]  code chapters 311 and 312 specifically says how the legislature, the courts, and the executive
[43:18.920 --> 43:24.120]  must all interpret law that contains terms of art.
[43:24.120 --> 43:30.120]  If the term or phrase that is being used as a term of art is not defined by the statute
[43:30.120 --> 43:36.560]  in question or any other part of the law in question, then they are required to give it
[43:36.560 --> 43:47.120]  the same definition that experts in the profession, occupation, or art give to that term.
[43:47.120 --> 43:51.480]  And everybody that works in the profession of transportation knows exactly what the hell
[43:51.480 --> 43:52.480]  that term means.
[43:52.480 --> 43:55.600]  Hang on just a second and we'll wrap this up on the other side, okay?
[43:55.600 --> 44:00.960]  All right folks, y'all hang on, we'll be right back.
[44:00.960 --> 44:04.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.160 --> 44:10.920]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand 4CD course
[44:10.920 --> 44:14.880]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.880 --> 44:18.720]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.720 --> 44:22.800]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.800 --> 44:28.640]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.640 --> 44:34.560]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.560 --> 44:39.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.120 --> 44:43.400]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.400 --> 44:49.600]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.600 --> 44:56.240]  Jose tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.240 --> 45:00.440]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.440 --> 45:06.120]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[45:06.120 --> 45:10.520]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[45:10.520 --> 45:14.400]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality
[45:14.400 --> 45:16.000]  coins and precious metals.
[45:16.000 --> 45:19.800]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[45:19.800 --> 45:24.600]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers
[45:24.600 --> 45:25.600]  and journalists.
[45:25.600 --> 45:28.560]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[45:28.560 --> 45:32.800]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products, such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[45:32.800 --> 45:33.800]  Pollen Burst.
[45:33.800 --> 45:38.680]  We also offer one-world way, Mountain House storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition
[45:38.680 --> 45:40.880]  at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[45:40.880 --> 45:44.800]  We boil through metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment.
[45:44.800 --> 45:47.800]  Call us at 512-646-644-0.
[45:47.800 --> 45:52.800]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[45:52.800 --> 45:55.800]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[45:55.800 --> 46:23.800]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[46:23.800 --> 46:52.800]  Thank you so much for your time and I'm definitely going to head down this direction.
[46:52.800 --> 47:00.360]  It takes a lot of time and effort, believe me, it's not something you're going to figure
[47:00.360 --> 47:06.040]  out and find all the key aspects of it in one night, but if you'll take a look at my
[47:06.040 --> 47:15.440]  legal blog, which is toweloflaw.wordpress.com, you'll learn a lot of information that gives
[47:15.440 --> 47:21.000]  you an idea of where to look and what to be looking for so that you can make sense of
[47:21.000 --> 47:24.000]  it faster than you would on your own.
[47:24.000 --> 47:30.280]  Right, I have been on the website and there's a lot there for sure.
[47:30.280 --> 47:37.760]  Just one last thing, it's just small, in regards to what you talked about, never getting the
[47:37.760 --> 47:42.240]  dealership, if you went to buy a brand new vehicle and never getting the dealership to
[47:42.240 --> 47:47.120]  take care of the title for you and the loan process and things.
[47:47.120 --> 47:55.200]  In Florida, I live in Ohio now, but in Florida, I talked with a lady and I talked with multiple
[47:55.200 --> 48:01.360]  people in the different bureaus and all, but they said that it's illegal for me to buy
[48:01.360 --> 48:10.600]  a car without having the dealership, if the title to the bank, it's illegal for me to
[48:10.600 --> 48:11.600]  take off the vehicle.
[48:11.600 --> 48:16.000]  Not if you pay for it and cash, if there's a lien on it, that's a different story.
[48:16.000 --> 48:21.280]  Well, this lady in the bureau was saying that it was illegal for me to...
[48:21.280 --> 48:25.160]  Now, never trust the bureaucrat to tell you what the law is.
[48:25.160 --> 48:26.160]  They don't know.
[48:26.160 --> 48:27.160]  They've never read it.
[48:27.160 --> 48:31.680]  They were trained to do it by somebody that had the job before them who also never read
[48:31.680 --> 48:32.680]  it.
[48:32.680 --> 48:38.760]  You can go to any state of the union and buy a car and tell them not to register it because
[48:38.760 --> 48:44.360]  you're going to register it in some other state from where you're currently buying it.
[48:44.360 --> 48:45.360]  People do that all the time.
[48:45.360 --> 48:49.600]  I've bought one and told them don't do anything with the paperwork or registration or anything
[48:49.600 --> 48:52.880]  because I'm going to register it in Utah when I move.
[48:52.880 --> 48:53.880]  Okay.
[48:53.880 --> 48:54.880]  All right.
[48:54.880 --> 48:58.400]  No, they're dead wrong.
[48:58.400 --> 49:04.680]  The other thing about it is, is the law in most states specifically says that registration
[49:04.680 --> 49:12.320]  must occur, especially if it's on a loan to buy the car, then the other party must have
[49:12.320 --> 49:16.560]  a security in that car, hence the reason the state's able to get involved in the first
[49:16.560 --> 49:20.560]  place because there's a contract for negotiable instruments involved.
[49:20.560 --> 49:21.560]  Okay.
[49:21.560 --> 49:26.880]  And that was what kind of led me down this trail to begin with is trying to get a hold
[49:26.880 --> 49:34.760]  of the MCO and find out if the local title agency or BNV has my original MCO and they
[49:34.760 --> 49:38.160]  were like, well, it's illegal to get and now at this point, you're not allowed to have
[49:38.160 --> 49:39.160]  that anymore.
[49:39.160 --> 49:40.160]  No, that's not true.
[49:40.160 --> 49:45.880]  Tell them to show you the law that says that because there isn't one.
[49:45.880 --> 49:52.120]  Most states have a law that dictates what construes a first sale of a car.
[49:52.120 --> 50:00.480]  That first sale only applies when that car is being sold for use as a motor vehicle for
[50:00.480 --> 50:03.800]  commercial purposes.
[50:03.800 --> 50:09.320]  And that's what they're talking about is when it's the subject of a first sale, but when
[50:09.320 --> 50:16.360]  it's being sold to you as a private use auto, it is not subject of a first sale, even though
[50:16.360 --> 50:19.600]  that's how they're reading it and how they're applying it.
[50:19.600 --> 50:21.320]  That's not what's actually happening.
[50:21.320 --> 50:25.320]  It's not what the law says it is.
[50:25.320 --> 50:30.960]  So you're saying even though they're pushing it this way, that it pushed them to show that
[50:30.960 --> 50:33.320]  I should have a right to the MCO?
[50:33.320 --> 50:34.320]  Absolutely.
[50:34.320 --> 50:37.920]  As long as you're paying cash for the car.
[50:37.920 --> 50:40.400]  You can't do that if you're getting a loan.
[50:40.400 --> 50:42.200]  Right, for sure.
[50:42.200 --> 50:43.200]  For sure.
[50:43.200 --> 50:44.200]  Okay.
[50:44.200 --> 50:45.200]  Well, I appreciate it.
[50:45.200 --> 50:47.400]  I'll let you wrap this up with me.
[50:47.400 --> 50:48.400]  Okay.
[50:48.400 --> 50:49.400]  Thanks for calling.
[50:49.400 --> 50:50.400]  Yeah.
[50:50.400 --> 50:51.400]  Definitely.
[50:51.400 --> 50:52.400]  Thank you.
[50:52.400 --> 50:53.400]  Yes, sir.
[50:53.400 --> 50:54.400]  Bye-bye.
[50:54.400 --> 50:55.400]  All right.
[50:55.400 --> 50:57.400]  Now we have John in New York.
[50:57.400 --> 50:59.400]  John, what can we do for you?
[50:59.400 --> 51:00.400]  Right.
[51:00.400 --> 51:01.400]  How are you?
[51:01.400 --> 51:02.400]  Thank you.
[51:02.400 --> 51:07.400]  I'm good if you'll get that phone from scratching around there.
[51:07.400 --> 51:09.520]  There we go.
[51:09.520 --> 51:19.120]  Now, we've got a little bit more information on a traffic ticket issued for not wearing
[51:19.120 --> 51:20.120]  a seatbelt.
[51:20.120 --> 51:26.200]  First of all, the defendant really did have a seatbelt on, but that's neither here nor
[51:26.200 --> 51:27.200]  there.
[51:27.200 --> 51:34.560]  What it all comes right down to, that's what we can prove.
[51:34.560 --> 51:44.360]  Long story short, the ticket said no seatbelt in a New York state, it's 1229, see like Charlie
[51:44.360 --> 51:45.360]  3.
[51:45.360 --> 51:53.360]  That's the section on the seatbelt.
[51:53.360 --> 52:01.840]  So the charge on the ticket says no seatbelt, and then when the passenger or the guest got
[52:01.840 --> 52:08.200]  out of the car, he said to the officer at the scene, he did have a seatbelt down, and
[52:08.200 --> 52:16.800]  I'll swear to that in the court of law, then the officer quickly and very obviously changed
[52:16.800 --> 52:17.800]  his tune.
[52:17.800 --> 52:21.560]  He said, well, you weren't wearing it properly.
[52:21.560 --> 52:27.560]  So now he goes from no seatbelt at all to wearing it improperly.
[52:27.560 --> 52:34.680]  Once the court comes the court date, he gets up and he tells his side of the story about
[52:34.680 --> 52:43.800]  how he parked and he was watching traffic, and he saw Mr. Smith not wearing a seatbelt
[52:43.800 --> 52:44.800]  improperly.
[52:44.800 --> 52:54.000]  Well, the defendant objected and said, your honor, the traffic charge says no seatbelt,
[52:54.000 --> 52:58.680]  and now we're going to, you weren't wearing it properly.
[52:58.680 --> 53:04.080]  That means, and I think what the point he was trying to make was, now the officer himself
[53:04.080 --> 53:06.360]  is testifying for me.
[53:06.360 --> 53:10.400]  He didn't say it that way, but that's what it boiled down to.
[53:10.400 --> 53:15.000]  So now you can't have a charge on the seatbelt ticket.
[53:15.000 --> 53:20.440]  It says you weren't wearing it at all when the cop got up and admitted in front of everybody
[53:20.440 --> 53:22.520]  he was wearing it.
[53:22.520 --> 53:24.480]  You can't do both.
[53:24.480 --> 53:25.800]  So he objected to that.
[53:25.800 --> 53:33.800]  He objected to the fact that he asked for a deposition from the court, never got it.
[53:33.800 --> 53:37.480]  The police officer had given him a deposition at the scene.
[53:37.480 --> 53:43.920]  When I read the New York State law, and according to what I think I'm reading, it doesn't say
[53:43.920 --> 53:51.240]  just because the cop gave it to you that you can't ask for it from the court.
[53:51.240 --> 53:54.520]  And when you don't get it within 30 days, it's very specific.
[53:54.520 --> 54:01.320]  It says in 30 days, if you don't get it, then the ticket must be by law dismissed.
[54:01.320 --> 54:05.680]  Well, he never got it from the court.
[54:05.680 --> 54:10.920]  And the judges just walked right past that one by saying, well, you got the deposition
[54:10.920 --> 54:12.800]  from the officer that day.
[54:12.800 --> 54:14.240]  You didn't need one from the court.
[54:14.240 --> 54:18.240]  Well, that's not what the law says as far as I can tell.
[54:18.240 --> 54:22.560]  The law doesn't say, well, just because the cop gives you one, that you can't ask for
[54:22.560 --> 54:23.560]  one from the court.
[54:23.560 --> 54:26.360]  And if you don't get it in 30 days, then the ticket...
[54:26.360 --> 54:36.240]  Well, first off, what does the law say that particular document must be constructed from?
[54:36.240 --> 54:38.360]  And who must supply it?
[54:38.360 --> 54:43.520]  If the law says that the court is the one required to provide it, it doesn't make a
[54:43.520 --> 54:46.320]  damn what the officer gives him on the side of the road.
[54:46.320 --> 54:47.320]  Okay?
[54:47.320 --> 54:48.320]  Well...
[54:48.320 --> 54:56.280]  So, what does the law say that document you're talking about actually must come...who must
[54:56.280 --> 54:59.080]  it come from and what must it contain?
[54:59.080 --> 55:01.080]  All right.
[55:01.080 --> 55:08.160]  You request it through the court, and then the judge signs a paper that says, according
[55:08.160 --> 55:23.400]  to CPL, Criminal Procedure Law, 100.252, you have 30 days to produce it, Mr. Officer.
[55:23.400 --> 55:30.000]  If you don't produce it within 30 days, then 1, 4...
[55:30.000 --> 55:31.000]  Oh, let's see.
[55:31.000 --> 55:32.000]  What is it?
[55:32.000 --> 55:41.120]  140 point...the numbers, I forget the numbers, but 140, CPL, 140 point, something takes effect
[55:41.120 --> 55:46.280]  and the ticket is going to be automatically dismissed if you don't follow through, Mr.
[55:46.280 --> 55:47.280]  Officer.
[55:47.280 --> 55:54.960]  So, the judge ordered the officer to produce that deposition and cause it to be, I think
[55:54.960 --> 56:03.160]  the wording is, delivered to the defendant, not just sent, whether it makes it there or
[56:03.160 --> 56:07.080]  not, makes no difference, as long as it's sent.
[56:07.080 --> 56:11.440]  It seems to be that it's got to be delivered to the defendant.
[56:11.440 --> 56:12.440]  Okay.
[56:12.440 --> 56:16.600]  You're putting a lot of phrasing in this that makes us sound like you don't know for sure
[56:16.600 --> 56:20.560]  if all of these things are really what is required or if you're just thinking they're
[56:20.560 --> 56:21.560]  what's required.
[56:21.560 --> 56:27.640]  Well, you've got to see the New York State, you've got to see the way the New York State
[56:27.640 --> 56:28.640]  law is written.
[56:28.640 --> 56:29.640]  Well, no.
[56:29.640 --> 56:30.640]  That's the thing.
[56:30.640 --> 56:31.640]  I don't have to see it.
[56:31.640 --> 56:35.720]  You're the one or whoever is the one that's making the arguments the one that's got to
[56:35.720 --> 56:40.080]  see it that's got to understand it and has got to use it.
[56:40.080 --> 56:44.000]  They're the ones that has to know whether or not the judge is full of crap.
[56:44.000 --> 56:48.440]  They're the one that has to make the allegation the judge is not applying the law to the facts
[56:48.440 --> 56:52.560]  and it's trying to rewrite the law from the bench.
[56:52.560 --> 56:57.280]  They're the ones that has to do that.
[56:57.280 --> 57:01.720]  What I'm getting at is how is that supposed to be a question that I can help you with
[57:01.720 --> 57:02.720]  on this show?
[57:02.720 --> 57:04.040]  Because I haven't read that law.
[57:04.040 --> 57:05.480]  I don't know what that law says.
[57:05.480 --> 57:08.520]  I don't know what the document is you're talking about.
[57:08.520 --> 57:11.560]  How am I supposed to be able to help you with that information?
[57:11.560 --> 57:14.080]  Well, two things.
[57:14.080 --> 57:18.680]  First of all, I wrote the appeal and you tell me what I made a mistake in.
[57:18.680 --> 57:22.560]  Well, how am I going to know that if I don't know what the basis for your allegation of
[57:22.560 --> 57:25.040]  a mistake are?
[57:25.040 --> 57:26.600]  What is the basis here?
[57:26.600 --> 57:30.000]  All these things you're telling me deal with the law that I haven't read.
[57:30.000 --> 57:33.720]  Well, then let me read it to you and then you'll know.
[57:33.720 --> 57:37.640]  Well, John, I don't have time to sit here and for you to go through all that stuff and
[57:37.640 --> 57:40.640]  me to try to formulate a response for you on the air.
[57:40.640 --> 57:42.320]  That's not what this show is for.
[57:42.320 --> 57:45.480]  If you want to do that stuff, do it in an email.
[57:45.480 --> 57:46.480]  Cool it.
[57:46.480 --> 57:47.480]  Wait.
[57:47.480 --> 57:48.480]  Stop.
[57:48.480 --> 57:49.480]  Please.
[57:49.480 --> 57:52.840]  It will become abundantly clear in 90 seconds at the office of fate.
[57:52.840 --> 57:54.360]  You don't have 90 seconds.
[57:54.360 --> 57:59.200]  I'm about to go on another break.
[57:59.200 --> 58:00.840]  What the hell did I call for?
[58:00.840 --> 58:05.280]  Well, that's the part I'm asking you.
[58:05.280 --> 58:08.120]  Let me read it and then you'll know.
[58:08.120 --> 58:10.400]  I'm about to have to take another break.
[58:10.400 --> 58:12.280]  You don't have time to read it.
[58:12.280 --> 58:16.000]  Hang on and I will get you on the other side of this break.
[58:16.000 --> 58:17.000]  Okay?
[58:17.000 --> 58:18.000]  Got it.
[58:18.000 --> 58:22.880]  All right, folks, this is rule of law radio.
[58:22.880 --> 58:26.120]  We're going to take us to another break here and we will be right back.
[58:26.120 --> 58:50.400]  Call in number 512-646-1984, give us a call, get in line, and we shall return.
[58:50.400 --> 58:55.840]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.840 --> 58:58.600]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.600 --> 59:04.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.240]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.240 --> 59:09.040]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.040 --> 59:14.960]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.960 --> 59:18.680]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.680 --> 59:23.680]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.680 --> 59:28.400]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.400 --> 59:33.560]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.560 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.840]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.840 --> 01:00:06.280]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star of Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:12.840]  Markets for Monday the 21st of January, 2019, open with precious metals, gold at $1,277.74
[01:00:12.840 --> 01:00:19.800]  an ounce, silver $15.22 an ounce, copper $2.68 an ounce, oil Texas crude $53.80 a barrel,
[01:00:19.800 --> 01:00:27.520]  Brent crude $62.70 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap Bitcoin $3,579.35, Ripple
[01:00:27.520 --> 01:00:37.720]  XRP $0.32, Ethereum $117.88 and Bitcoin cash is at $123.39 a crypto coin.
[01:00:37.720 --> 01:00:46.520]  History, the year 1525, the Swiss Anabaptist Movement is founded when Conrad Grebel, Felix
[01:00:46.520 --> 01:00:51.640]  Manns, George Florek, and about a dozen others baptize each other in the home of Manns'
[01:00:51.640 --> 01:00:58.200]  mother, Inzurek, the rediscovery of adult baptism, take history.
[01:00:58.200 --> 01:01:02.240]  In recent news, Texas craft breweries are challenging a Texas law which spars customers
[01:01:02.240 --> 01:01:03.760]  from taking beer to go.
[01:01:03.760 --> 01:01:07.480]  State law emphasizes that customers are allowed to take wine or distilled spirits home when
[01:01:07.480 --> 01:01:12.080]  visiting in winery or distillery, but somehow the same privilege is not applied to breweries.
[01:01:12.080 --> 01:01:15.600]  If that doesn't seem unfair enough, it turns out Texas is the only state where this nuanced
[01:01:15.600 --> 01:01:17.400]  regulation is still in effect.
[01:01:17.400 --> 01:01:22.560]  With the number of craft breweries in Texas exploding from 59 to more than 250 since 2011,
[01:01:22.560 --> 01:01:26.280]  it seems pressure to change these blue law era rules is brewing.
[01:01:26.280 --> 01:01:29.800]  Two beer to go bills have been submitted at the state legislators so far along with the
[01:01:29.800 --> 01:01:35.800]  craft beer lobby working with lawmakers to change the current laws.
[01:01:35.800 --> 01:01:40.200]  A BuzzFeed News article published on their website last Thursday written by Jason Leopold
[01:01:40.200 --> 01:01:44.360]  and Anthony Cormier claimed that prosecutors had evidence that President Trump told Michael
[01:01:44.360 --> 01:01:48.480]  Cohen, Trump's former attorney, to light a Congress about his proposed office tower
[01:01:48.480 --> 01:01:51.120]  project in Moscow in 2016.
[01:01:51.120 --> 01:01:55.200]  The article turned out to be a huge failure in investigative journalism and yet another
[01:01:55.200 --> 01:01:58.600]  example of fake news for the sake of undermining the president.
[01:01:58.600 --> 01:02:03.080]  A statement by Robert Mueller's office on Friday said that, quote, the BuzzFeed's description
[01:02:03.080 --> 01:02:07.640]  of specific statements to the special counsel's office and characterization of documents and
[01:02:07.640 --> 01:02:11.960]  testimony obtained by the office regarding Michael Cohen's congressional testimony are
[01:02:11.960 --> 01:02:13.360]  not accurate.
[01:02:13.360 --> 01:02:17.720]  Robert Mueller is the former FBI director who is now a special counsel for the United States
[01:02:17.720 --> 01:02:22.200]  Department of Justice who has been investigating Russian interference in the 2016 United States
[01:02:22.200 --> 01:02:27.960]  election and related matters by appointment in 2017 by then deputy attorney General Rod
[01:02:27.960 --> 01:02:28.960]  Rosenstein.
[01:02:28.960 --> 01:02:33.480]  In response to Mueller's office, editor Ben Smith said that BuzzFeed stood by in story
[01:02:33.480 --> 01:02:36.960]  urging Mueller to, quote, make clear what he's disputing.
[01:02:36.960 --> 01:02:40.760]  Speaking to reporters on Saturday, the president said that, quote, I think that the BuzzFeed
[01:02:40.760 --> 01:02:45.280]  piece was a disgrace to our country, it was a disgrace to journalism and I think also
[01:02:45.280 --> 01:02:50.520]  the coverage by the mainstream media was disgraceful and I think it's going to take a long time
[01:02:50.520 --> 01:02:52.960]  for the mainstream media to recover its credibility.
[01:02:52.960 --> 01:03:22.800]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for January 21st, 2019.
[01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:26.940]  The
[01:03:26.940 --> 01:03:36.080]  Beause you can't spot a bout and you can't make a run cause when the mulled boys raise
[01:03:36.080 --> 01:03:37.080]  don't shot guns.
[01:03:37.080 --> 01:03:40.160]  We say praise, we say man if you ain't into this we don't give a damn.
[01:03:40.160 --> 01:03:51.440]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky Mountains and the Western Steins.
[01:03:51.440 --> 01:04:07.440]  The preacher man says it's the end of time and the Mississippi River, she's a gold grime.
[01:04:07.440 --> 01:04:11.440]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:04:11.440 --> 01:04:15.440]  Okay, let's see if we can get back on this with John here.
[01:04:15.440 --> 01:04:19.440]  If I can find the dead-blame mouse. There we go.
[01:04:19.440 --> 01:04:22.440]  Thank you. Okay, thank you very much.
[01:04:22.440 --> 01:04:28.440]  There are three elements to the appeal. Each element takes 30 seconds. Here we go.
[01:04:28.440 --> 01:04:33.440]  Element number one. I believe I hit a right to a verdict of not guilty with prejudice.
[01:04:33.440 --> 01:04:35.440]  Okay, wait, stop, stop, stop.
[01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:37.440]  Got it.
[01:04:37.440 --> 01:04:46.440]  You're going to an appeal. I still don't know what the law is you're arguing about on the appeal, which was my point from the very beginning.
[01:04:46.440 --> 01:04:48.440]  Okay, I'll tell you.
[01:04:48.440 --> 01:04:54.440]  There is a seatbelt law. It is number 1229c3.
[01:04:54.440 --> 01:05:02.440]  I know. The law you're arguing about is one that says that you have to get some sort of written notice from the court if it's requested,
[01:05:02.440 --> 01:05:05.440]  but then a certain number of days of the ticket must be dismissed.
[01:05:05.440 --> 01:05:13.440]  Well, just let me do it this way, please. It'll become abundantly clear when I read it.
[01:05:13.440 --> 01:05:20.440]  Element number one. I believe I had a right to a verdict of guilty or not guilty with prejudice for at least three reasons.
[01:05:20.440 --> 01:05:29.440]  First, I challenged the sufficiency of the charging instrument. The charge on the ticket was no seatbelt in trial court.
[01:05:29.440 --> 01:05:37.440]  The officer, by his own admission, testified that I was indeed wearing my seatbelt, even for a late person.
[01:05:37.440 --> 01:05:48.440]  Does the seatbelt statute have a specific clause relating to not proper wearing of a seatbelt?
[01:05:48.440 --> 01:05:57.440]  I've never seen one. I've read it ten times and I've never seen one. To the best of my ability, I've never seen one. I know what you mean.
[01:05:57.440 --> 01:06:01.440]  I know exactly what you mean because I've read it so many times.
[01:06:01.440 --> 01:06:06.440]  Is it the only statute dealing with seatbelts?
[01:06:06.440 --> 01:06:18.440]  No, then there's other statutes in the V&T law that deals with 16-year-olds, 4-year-olds, weight.
[01:06:18.440 --> 01:06:22.440]  Again, do any of them contain such a clause?
[01:06:22.440 --> 01:06:27.440]  No. I've never seen one. And I've read it ten times.
[01:06:27.440 --> 01:06:30.440]  Okay.
[01:06:30.440 --> 01:06:38.440]  But you've got to see New York State law how ambiguous it is. And they do that for a reason.
[01:06:38.440 --> 01:06:42.440]  Please continue with your dissertation, John.
[01:06:42.440 --> 01:06:49.440]  Well, they got it. In trial court, the officer, by his own admission, testified that I was indeed wearing my seatbelt.
[01:06:49.440 --> 01:06:54.440]  Even for a late person, the two contradictions should have ended the case right there.
[01:06:54.440 --> 01:07:00.440]  I was deprived of proper notice as to what I was there for to defend myself again.
[01:07:00.440 --> 01:07:08.440]  I moved the appeals court to rule that I had a right to a verdict of not guilty with prejudice.
[01:07:08.440 --> 01:07:12.440]  There is no such thing as not guilty with prejudice.
[01:07:12.440 --> 01:07:15.440]  Okay. What do I say there?
[01:07:15.440 --> 01:07:18.440]  Not guilty is all there is.
[01:07:18.440 --> 01:07:19.440]  Okay, got it.
[01:07:19.440 --> 01:07:26.440]  You either seek not guilty or a dismissal of the charges with prejudice without a verdict.
[01:07:26.440 --> 01:07:31.440]  Oh, I see. All right. Which would you put in there?
[01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:39.440]  You are entitled to a dismissal, not a or a directed verdict of not guilty.
[01:07:39.440 --> 01:07:43.440]  Okay, so one more time.
[01:07:43.440 --> 01:07:49.440]  You were entitled to one or the other. You had the opportunity to ask for either one.
[01:07:49.440 --> 01:07:54.440]  The only question is, did you?
[01:07:54.440 --> 01:08:08.440]  Was there ever anything filed in the court or anything stated on the record demanding a dismissal with prejudice or a directed verdict in favor of the defense of not guilty?
[01:08:08.440 --> 01:08:15.440]  Yes, just the defendant asked for a dismissal with prejudice.
[01:08:15.440 --> 01:08:18.440]  In writing or at trial?
[01:08:18.440 --> 01:08:20.440]  At trial.
[01:08:20.440 --> 01:08:22.440]  On the record?
[01:08:22.440 --> 01:08:24.440]  On the record, yes.
[01:08:24.440 --> 01:08:25.440]  Okay.
[01:08:25.440 --> 01:08:26.440]  Yes.
[01:08:26.440 --> 01:08:29.440]  Signing what authority?
[01:08:29.440 --> 01:08:34.440]  Signing what authority.
[01:08:34.440 --> 01:08:37.440]  I believe that's all he said.
[01:08:37.440 --> 01:08:46.440]  All he said was I wanted a dismissal with prejudice and he didn't state any other reason why?
[01:08:46.440 --> 01:08:49.440]  Yeah. First, the officer...
[01:08:49.440 --> 01:08:51.440]  Yeah, why?
[01:08:51.440 --> 01:08:58.440]  He said first the officer said that he was not wearing a seatbelt and put that in the ticket.
[01:08:58.440 --> 01:09:09.440]  Then the officer stands up in court and admits that the defendant was wearing a seatbelt.
[01:09:09.440 --> 01:09:16.440]  So what exactly did he say when he requested the dismissal?
[01:09:16.440 --> 01:09:18.440]  What I just said.
[01:09:18.440 --> 01:09:19.440]  The officer...
[01:09:19.440 --> 01:09:21.440]  Were you there?
[01:09:21.440 --> 01:09:23.440]  I was sitting 10 feet away.
[01:09:23.440 --> 01:09:30.440]  Okay, then give me the exact words. Don't summarize it for me. Tell me exactly what was said.
[01:09:30.440 --> 01:09:34.440]  I just did. He said to the judge...
[01:09:34.440 --> 01:09:41.440]  No, you're telling me from a third person perspective. Tell me what he said. Verbatim.
[01:09:41.440 --> 01:09:52.440]  Oh, verbatim. Your Honor, the ticket says no seatbelt, but I was not wearing a seatbelt.
[01:09:52.440 --> 01:09:58.440]  The officer just testified that I was wearing a seatbelt.
[01:09:58.440 --> 01:10:03.440]  What is the use of the charging instrument in New York?
[01:10:03.440 --> 01:10:07.440]  For a traffic violation, it's a traffic ticket.
[01:10:07.440 --> 01:10:11.440]  And is the ticket signed under penalty of perjury?
[01:10:11.440 --> 01:10:13.440]  Yes.
[01:10:13.440 --> 01:10:22.440]  Okay, they cannot, and there's plenty of case law on that, they cannot charge you with one offense and convict you of a different offense.
[01:10:22.440 --> 01:10:30.440]  It should have to be this. It's the only thing you can sign up with trying to make. They're contradicting each other.
[01:10:30.440 --> 01:10:36.440]  Okay, so again, he asked for a dismissal with prejudice, not a directed verdict.
[01:10:36.440 --> 01:10:37.440]  That's correct.
[01:10:37.440 --> 01:10:42.440]  Okay, then that's what you need to say.
[01:10:42.440 --> 01:10:46.440]  All right, second element.
[01:10:46.440 --> 01:10:51.440]  During the trial, I asked the officer what evidence he had against me.
[01:10:51.440 --> 01:10:59.440]  I asked if he had any pictures, witnesses in the courtroom, or sworn affidavits from witnesses who weren't present in the courtroom.
[01:10:59.440 --> 01:11:01.440]  And he said no to everything.
[01:11:01.440 --> 01:11:12.440]  I then told the court, the judge, since there was no real evidence against me, only an unsupported accusation by the officer, the rules of evidence weren't followed in trial court.
[01:11:12.440 --> 01:11:14.440]  And for this additional reason, I moved.
[01:11:14.440 --> 01:11:20.440]  Where does the rules of evidence say that the officer's testimony is not sufficient?
[01:11:20.440 --> 01:11:22.440]  Well...
[01:11:22.440 --> 01:11:32.440]  Even more to the point, like here in Texas, where it says the rules of evidence don't apply in these types of cases in these types of courts.
[01:11:32.440 --> 01:11:38.440]  Well, number one, I do know this, that the rules of evidence are basically the same in any courtroom.
[01:11:38.440 --> 01:11:43.440]  No, they're not, so you don't know what you're talking about. That's not true.
[01:11:43.440 --> 01:11:45.440]  I just told you it's not true.
[01:11:45.440 --> 01:11:54.440]  Here in Texas, the law specifically says that the rules of evidence can be ignored in justice and municipal courts in relation to these types of cases.
[01:11:54.440 --> 01:11:58.440]  They can be completely ignored.
[01:11:58.440 --> 01:12:01.440]  So is there such a clause in New York?
[01:12:01.440 --> 01:12:14.440]  And if not, where is the clause that says the officer's testimony alone, whether substantiated by other means or not, is not sufficient evidence?
[01:12:14.440 --> 01:12:20.440]  It is up to the plaintiff in any courtroom in the United States of America. I do know this.
[01:12:20.440 --> 01:12:23.440]  This is not an answer to my question, John.
[01:12:23.440 --> 01:12:29.440]  I'm not asking you to give me a dissertation on how plaintiffs work in any state in America when it comes to the rules of evidence.
[01:12:29.440 --> 01:12:37.440]  I'm asking you specifically what the rules of evidence in the state of New York do or do not say in regard to my point.
[01:12:37.440 --> 01:12:46.440]  So either the answer is, this is what it says in this section, or the answer is, I don't know. Which is it?
[01:12:46.440 --> 01:12:53.440]  It is up to the plaintiff to prove beyond the reasonable doubt that the defendant did whatever they say he did.
[01:12:53.440 --> 01:13:01.440]  And if the court says the officer's testimony is beyond reasonable doubt, where are you saying that is not sufficient?
[01:13:01.440 --> 01:13:08.440]  What are you basing that on? What is your friend basing that on?
[01:13:08.440 --> 01:13:16.440]  For the same reason that if I say I didn't do it, that doesn't hold water. But the officer says I did it so automatically.
[01:13:16.440 --> 01:13:23.440]  Okay. Now that we know what your opinion is, what is the damned law?
[01:13:23.440 --> 01:13:25.440]  Well, and I guess I don't know the law.
[01:13:25.440 --> 01:13:34.440]  Thank you. Good move on to the third step that isn't helping us so far.
[01:13:34.440 --> 01:13:38.440]  You said there were three. Where's the third one?
[01:13:38.440 --> 01:13:41.440]  It just started. Just let me finish.
[01:13:41.440 --> 01:13:54.440]  Third, the law says CPL 100.252, the defendant has the right to request from the court, from the court.
[01:13:54.440 --> 01:14:00.440]  From the court, a deposition to be delivered to the defendant.
[01:14:00.440 --> 01:14:06.440]  A deposition. What is the definition of a deposition in that context?
[01:14:06.440 --> 01:14:16.440]  In this state, a deposition is further amplification and explanation of what happened the day the ticket was written.
[01:14:16.440 --> 01:14:24.440]  In other words, the ticket will say a charge on it like no seatbelt. Then the officer will, in the deposition, go on to say,
[01:14:24.440 --> 01:14:29.440]  I was parked at the intersection of blah, blah, blah. I saw the defendant go by.
[01:14:29.440 --> 01:14:39.440]  I noticed he wasn't wearing a seatbelt. He was proceeding south and I followed him. I stopped him and I saw he was not wearing a seatbelt.
[01:14:39.440 --> 01:14:49.440]  That would be a deposition. Then he signs that and I believe that is definitely under perjury as well.
[01:14:49.440 --> 01:14:54.440]  Okay. A deposition to be delivered to the defendant.
[01:14:54.440 --> 01:15:00.440]  What date was the ticket written?
[01:15:00.440 --> 01:15:06.440]  May, I'm going to say May 19th.
[01:15:06.440 --> 01:15:15.440]  2018. What, when was this deposition requested?
[01:15:15.440 --> 01:15:26.440]  Two days after that. By the time they received it, I don't know, I guess maybe three, four days had gone by.
[01:15:26.440 --> 01:15:35.440]  And how long after that was the trial?
[01:15:35.440 --> 01:15:39.440]  It was after 30 days.
[01:15:39.440 --> 01:15:42.440]  Of which you were absolutely 100% positive.
[01:15:42.440 --> 01:15:45.440]  Oh, 100% positive. It was longer than 30 days.
[01:15:45.440 --> 01:15:55.440]  Now, what is the specific language in the statute that says that the citation must be voided if that deposition is not provided?
[01:15:55.440 --> 01:16:03.440]  It says this. I could pull it up and read it to you. It was right out of the judge's own office.
[01:16:03.440 --> 01:16:06.440]  But I can tell you what it says from memory.
[01:16:06.440 --> 01:16:09.440]  No, you can't.
[01:16:09.440 --> 01:16:10.440]  I can't?
[01:16:10.440 --> 01:16:14.440]  No, you can't.
[01:16:14.440 --> 01:16:21.440]  The thing about statutory language is, is you have to see it to know what you're looking at.
[01:16:21.440 --> 01:16:27.440]  Audible language from a statute is not going to get you anywhere. Trust me on this.
[01:16:27.440 --> 01:16:31.440]  Trust me on this. I read it 20 times.
[01:16:31.440 --> 01:16:33.440]  I've almost got it memorized.
[01:16:33.440 --> 01:16:37.440]  Almost. Operative word here.
[01:16:37.440 --> 01:16:39.440]  Hold on and I'll pull it up for you.
[01:16:39.440 --> 01:16:42.440]  Please do that while I take him out of the break.
[01:16:42.440 --> 01:17:00.440]  All right, folks, y'all hang on. We will be right back after this break.
[01:17:00.440 --> 01:17:05.440]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.440 --> 01:17:09.440]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:17:09.440 --> 01:17:14.440]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.440 --> 01:17:20.440]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:17:20.440 --> 01:17:26.440]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.440 --> 01:17:29.440]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:29.440 --> 01:17:33.440]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.440 --> 01:17:38.440]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.440 --> 01:17:40.440]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.440 --> 01:17:46.440]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner,
[01:17:46.440 --> 01:17:49.440]  or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.440 --> 01:17:57.440]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.440 --> 01:18:00.440]  You'll learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.440 --> 01:18:04.440]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.440 --> 01:18:08.440]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.440 --> 01:18:13.440]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.440 --> 01:18:16.440]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a bloodite,
[01:18:16.440 --> 01:18:20.440]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.440 --> 01:18:22.440]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:22.440 --> 01:18:24.440]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.440 --> 01:18:29.440]  If you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.440 --> 01:18:31.440]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.440 --> 01:18:34.440]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.440 --> 01:18:37.440]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.440 --> 01:18:43.440]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.440 --> 01:18:44.440]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.440 --> 01:18:45.440]  No.
[01:18:45.440 --> 01:18:47.440]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.440 --> 01:18:48.440]  No.
[01:18:48.440 --> 01:18:49.440]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.440 --> 01:18:50.440]  No.
[01:18:50.440 --> 01:18:51.440]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.440 --> 01:18:55.440]  Well, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:55.440 --> 01:18:56.440]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.440 --> 01:18:58.440]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.440 --> 01:19:00.440]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.440 --> 01:19:22.440]  This is the Logos RadioNetwork.
[01:19:22.440 --> 01:19:37.440]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:37.440 --> 01:19:38.440]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:38.440 --> 01:19:41.440]  I've got three more segments in this show.
[01:19:41.440 --> 01:19:42.440]  Wonder wonders.
[01:19:42.440 --> 01:19:45.440]  All right, let's get back to it here.
[01:19:45.440 --> 01:19:47.440]  And we're back with John in New York.
[01:19:47.440 --> 01:19:50.440]  All right, John, let's continue this.
[01:19:50.440 --> 01:19:53.440]  I've got the paper somewhere in my computer.
[01:19:53.440 --> 01:19:55.440]  I cannot find it.
[01:19:55.440 --> 01:20:01.440]  It came directly from the judge, from his own hand, and it was typed, and then he signed
[01:20:01.440 --> 01:20:09.440]  it and told the cop, you have 30 days in order to produce the deposition, send it to the
[01:20:09.440 --> 01:20:15.440]  car, deliver it to the defendant, or the ticket will be dismissed.
[01:20:15.440 --> 01:20:18.440]  And the judge is not complying with his own rules.
[01:20:18.440 --> 01:20:22.440]  He gave directions to the cop, and he turned around telling your friend in open court that
[01:20:22.440 --> 01:20:24.440]  you got it from the cop on the day you got the ticket.
[01:20:24.440 --> 01:20:26.440]  That doesn't sound right.
[01:20:26.440 --> 01:20:32.440]  Well, of course, this is Boss High, Lulu Bell, and Roscoe P. Coltrane all rolled into one
[01:20:32.440 --> 01:20:34.440]  with the Dukes of Hazard.
[01:20:34.440 --> 01:20:39.440]  This is the county that is the most corrupt in the country.
[01:20:39.440 --> 01:20:44.440]  Well, I'm starting to wonder where Enos plays into all this at this point.
[01:20:44.440 --> 01:20:52.440]  But regardless, is there a statute that we're talking about here?
[01:20:52.440 --> 01:20:54.440]  Yeah, there is.
[01:20:54.440 --> 01:21:03.440]  It's 100.252 and 140.142.
[01:21:03.440 --> 01:21:06.440]  And that is New York State.
[01:21:06.440 --> 01:21:12.440]  One says you've got 30 days to send it, and the other says if you don't get it there,
[01:21:12.440 --> 01:21:14.440]  it's dismissed automatically.
[01:21:14.440 --> 01:21:17.440]  The ticket is automatically dismissed.
[01:21:17.440 --> 01:21:19.440]  Okay.
[01:21:19.440 --> 01:21:20.440]  And that's a fact.
[01:21:20.440 --> 01:21:22.440]  You can take that to the bank.
[01:21:22.440 --> 01:21:25.440]  Then the thing still applies on the third part.
[01:21:25.440 --> 01:21:31.440]  I was entitled to a dismissal with prejudice or a directed verdict because there was no
[01:21:31.440 --> 01:21:34.440]  case because the rules were not followed.
[01:21:34.440 --> 01:21:41.440]  But again, why was this not put in writing before Kyle ever began?
[01:21:41.440 --> 01:21:49.440]  It may have been put into writing, but all I saw was, all I witnessed was his verbal
[01:21:49.440 --> 01:21:51.440]  testimony to the judge.
[01:21:51.440 --> 01:21:55.440]  Well, if he had put it in in writing, then he could have simply said,
[01:21:55.440 --> 01:21:58.440]  Judge, if the court will notice such and such document was filed with this court,
[01:21:58.440 --> 01:22:02.440]  such and such date is such and such time that specifically quotes that the law
[01:22:02.440 --> 01:22:06.440]  requires this case to be dismissed with prejudice or that a directed verdict
[01:22:06.440 --> 01:22:13.440]  would be given at this time because the state no longer has a case.
[01:22:13.440 --> 01:22:17.440]  Now had he filed those documents in writing, that would have been all he would have had
[01:22:17.440 --> 01:22:19.440]  to say in the matter.
[01:22:19.440 --> 01:22:23.440]  And the judge, knowing that it was in writing, knowing it was filed ahead of time
[01:22:23.440 --> 01:22:26.440]  with the court, and knowing that the law was right in front of him and he couldn't
[01:22:26.440 --> 01:22:32.440]  ignore it, probably wouldn't have.
[01:22:32.440 --> 01:22:35.440]  I'll find out whether or not the defendant actually gave it to him in writing
[01:22:35.440 --> 01:22:36.440]  or not.
[01:22:36.440 --> 01:22:44.440]  Okay, now that we've gone through all of this, what is your question?
[01:22:44.440 --> 01:22:49.440]  It sounds to me like the first and the third elements are the ones that we should
[01:22:49.440 --> 01:22:54.440]  use in the appeal.
[01:22:54.440 --> 01:22:57.440]  Is that a question?
[01:22:57.440 --> 01:23:02.440]  No, that's a statement.
[01:23:02.440 --> 01:23:07.440]  Here is the question.
[01:23:07.440 --> 01:23:13.440]  The question is, the first and the third elements, as I have presented them,
[01:23:13.440 --> 01:23:19.440]  with any changes that you have suggested to be made, are they the ones that I should
[01:23:19.440 --> 01:23:21.440]  use in the appeal?
[01:23:21.440 --> 01:23:24.440]  I thought you just said that was a statement.
[01:23:24.440 --> 01:23:29.440]  Well, it sounds to me like you're telling me that the first and the third are the
[01:23:29.440 --> 01:23:33.440]  strongest ones to use.
[01:23:33.440 --> 01:23:38.440]  Based upon your information, if it is accurate, why wouldn't it be the one to
[01:23:38.440 --> 01:23:41.440]  use?
[01:23:41.440 --> 01:23:43.440]  Well, that's what I'm saying.
[01:23:43.440 --> 01:23:47.440]  It certainly sounds like that's what you're telling me.
[01:23:47.440 --> 01:23:52.440]  Well, based upon the information I don't have, my best guess is yes, that's what
[01:23:52.440 --> 01:23:56.440]  I'm telling you.
[01:23:56.440 --> 01:24:03.440]  Okay, and the wording as you gave it is the way we should put it in the appeal.
[01:24:03.440 --> 01:24:05.440]  Is that correct?
[01:24:05.440 --> 01:24:10.440]  He was entitled to one of two outcomes, either a dismissal with prejudice before the
[01:24:10.440 --> 01:24:16.440]  trial got started or a directed verdict in favor of the defense of not guilty if a
[01:24:16.440 --> 01:24:21.440]  trial started that should not have been started in the first place because it was
[01:24:21.440 --> 01:24:23.440]  never a valid case.
[01:24:23.440 --> 01:24:27.440]  It was the case of the court of water, which should have been an objection he made on
[01:24:27.440 --> 01:24:31.440]  its face right then and there to preserve it for the record, which I hope he did.
[01:24:31.440 --> 01:24:35.440]  Because on your appeal, if this was a court of record, you're going to need a copy of
[01:24:35.440 --> 01:24:37.440]  that transcript.
[01:24:37.440 --> 01:24:45.440]  It's the other reason why putting this stuff in in writing was so imperative.
[01:24:45.440 --> 01:24:49.440]  Well, I'll make sure whether or not he put it in writing.
[01:24:49.440 --> 01:24:54.440]  It'll be a little bit too late now if this is not a court of record.
[01:24:54.440 --> 01:24:56.440]  Well, it is a court of record.
[01:24:56.440 --> 01:25:00.440]  Really, there was a court reporter present?
[01:25:00.440 --> 01:25:02.440]  There wasn't a court reporter present.
[01:25:02.440 --> 01:25:05.440]  There was a digital recording.
[01:25:05.440 --> 01:25:08.440]  That doesn't mean it's automatically a court of record.
[01:25:08.440 --> 01:25:13.440]  That just means that someone made a record, but that doesn't make it a court of record.
[01:25:13.440 --> 01:25:17.440]  I know that, but this is a court of record.
[01:25:17.440 --> 01:25:20.440]  And where's the transcript?
[01:25:20.440 --> 01:25:22.440]  In the defendant's hands.
[01:25:22.440 --> 01:25:27.440]  So he has an actual transcription of the recording and a copy of the recording.
[01:25:27.440 --> 01:25:30.440]  So he can make sure the transcription is right.
[01:25:30.440 --> 01:25:37.440]  Well, they told him that he's not supposed to have a copy of the recording, which is ridiculous.
[01:25:37.440 --> 01:25:40.440]  Baloney.
[01:25:40.440 --> 01:25:43.440]  I have a copy of the recording.
[01:25:43.440 --> 01:25:48.440]  I took it upon myself to make a recording.
[01:25:48.440 --> 01:25:54.440]  Then you don't have a copy of theirs, but the point is, is that if he's entitled to a transcript,
[01:25:54.440 --> 01:25:58.440]  he's entitled to the audio recording that made that transcript.
[01:25:58.440 --> 01:26:01.440]  And that's the same in every state in America?
[01:26:01.440 --> 01:26:02.440]  No, not necessarily.
[01:26:02.440 --> 01:26:08.440]  Again, that's the difference between a court of record and a court of no record.
[01:26:08.440 --> 01:26:11.440]  Okay, so a court of record, you can have a recording.
[01:26:11.440 --> 01:26:12.440]  You can ask for a recording.
[01:26:12.440 --> 01:26:16.440]  You can ask for a copy of the recording upon which the transcript is based.
[01:26:16.440 --> 01:26:20.440]  How else are you supposed to verify that the transcript is accurate?
[01:26:20.440 --> 01:26:25.440]  Well, that's what we both said, that that's ridiculous, not to allow him to have a recording.
[01:26:25.440 --> 01:26:31.440]  Okay, you still need to find the law that backs that up, but that's beside the point.
[01:26:31.440 --> 01:26:36.440]  In any case, if your question is in relation to the appeal, then you're going to need the transcript.
[01:26:36.440 --> 01:26:42.440]  You're going to need to show how he asked for it, what he asked for,
[01:26:42.440 --> 01:26:50.440]  and demand that the appellate court rule that he should have gotten it.
[01:26:50.440 --> 01:26:56.440]  Okay, we will use the first element and the third element.
[01:26:56.440 --> 01:27:05.440]  That second element, it doesn't sound like from what you were telling me that it is has any weight.
[01:27:05.440 --> 01:27:12.440]  Based upon what I was hearing you talk about, I don't see how that would be anywhere near as effective or relevant as the other two.
[01:27:12.440 --> 01:27:13.440]  Okay.
[01:27:13.440 --> 01:27:21.440]  And again, my answer is based upon what you're telling me not what I've seen and know for sure.
[01:27:21.440 --> 01:27:29.440]  Okay, then we'll dump number two, state chief number one and number three.
[01:27:29.440 --> 01:27:31.440]  Okay, anything else?
[01:27:31.440 --> 01:27:33.440]  No, that should do it.
[01:27:33.440 --> 01:27:36.440]  Okay.
[01:27:36.440 --> 01:27:37.440]  Thank you.
[01:27:37.440 --> 01:27:41.440]  Yes, sir. Have a good night.
[01:27:41.440 --> 01:27:46.440]  Okay, well, there's that idea.
[01:27:46.440 --> 01:27:53.440]  Okay, now we have Raider's issue.
[01:27:53.440 --> 01:27:56.440]  This is me, Raider from Oregon.
[01:27:56.440 --> 01:27:59.440]  Okay, what can I do for you?
[01:27:59.440 --> 01:28:03.440]  Well, I hope your ear is doing a lot better than mine.
[01:28:03.440 --> 01:28:07.440]  Do you still have a law dog?
[01:28:07.440 --> 01:28:10.440]  Unless someone's told you in the last five minutes, yeah.
[01:28:10.440 --> 01:28:12.440]  All right.
[01:28:12.440 --> 01:28:17.440]  Well, yeah, I've lost two people in the past year, two chief figures in my life, two mentors.
[01:28:17.440 --> 01:28:22.440]  Okay, well, I hate to sound like I don't care or anything like that, but this is not the obituary columns.
[01:28:22.440 --> 01:28:24.440]  You called in the show for a purpose.
[01:28:24.440 --> 01:28:25.440]  What is it?
[01:28:25.440 --> 01:28:28.440]  I'm sure that's not the information that's going to be useful to me.
[01:28:28.440 --> 01:28:29.440]  Yeah.
[01:28:29.440 --> 01:28:34.440]  Don't mean to be cold-hearted, but I've got limited time on here and it's getting burned up.
[01:28:34.440 --> 01:28:36.440]  Yeah.
[01:28:36.440 --> 01:28:40.440]  Well, the simple solution is,
[01:28:40.440 --> 01:28:49.440]  Sergeant Will Cesar pulled me over a couple of months ago and his black and white spaceship took my property again, two blocks from my house.
[01:28:49.440 --> 01:28:52.440]  So the solution is the filing, so it's very simple.
[01:28:52.440 --> 01:29:00.440]  But this amounts to harassment because this is the third time and he had no architectural problem caused with any type of criminal conduct afoot.
[01:29:00.440 --> 01:29:09.440]  As you said many, many times, it's all I need to go by and use the seven interrogatories or the, you know, in the civil fractions thing that you have in your blog.
[01:29:09.440 --> 01:29:11.440]  So that's what I'm going to do.
[01:29:11.440 --> 01:29:20.440]  And I haven't heard from my counterfeit court here in the past couple months after I submitted my file and some person into this case again.
[01:29:20.440 --> 01:29:27.440]  I'm seeking, seeking to file lawsuit against his officer and his across the can.
[01:29:27.440 --> 01:29:31.440]  So let's see if I could dismiss it first in my favor and find out.
[01:29:31.440 --> 01:29:35.440]  So I don't know that that's, that's what's just going on recently.
[01:29:35.440 --> 01:29:37.440]  It's just before the start of the holidays.
[01:29:37.440 --> 01:29:47.440]  So this, I feel, I don't know for sure, but I think this was just something to kneel me, something to try and get even with me because I had a victory in the previous case.
[01:29:47.440 --> 01:29:50.440]  So it's just the whole thing started over again.
[01:29:50.440 --> 01:29:53.440]  Okay, hold on a second. I got another break coming up here.
[01:29:53.440 --> 01:29:54.440]  All right.
[01:29:54.440 --> 01:29:59.440]  Okay, folks, this is a rule of law and complaining radio. We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.440 --> 01:30:09.440]  In a South African game park, a rhinoceros died during an operation to embed a remotely readable tracking microchip in its horn.
[01:30:09.440 --> 01:30:15.440]  Under Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have details on the tragic death of Spencer the Rhino. Next.
[01:30:15.440 --> 01:30:21.440]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.440 --> 01:30:26.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.440 --> 01:30:34.440]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.440 --> 01:30:41.440]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.440 --> 01:30:45.440]  Start over with start page.
[01:30:45.440 --> 01:30:50.440]  Africa has a real problem with poachers who hunt endangered animals for ivory and meat.
[01:30:50.440 --> 01:30:57.440]  To stop the slaughter, they've tried various countermeasures, including locator microchips, to track the animals' movements.
[01:30:57.440 --> 01:31:04.440]  But a game park in South Africa made the wrong decision when they tried to embed a microchip into the horn of a rhino named Spencer.
[01:31:04.440 --> 01:31:11.440]  To perform the procedure, veterinarians injected him with sedatives, inserted the chip, and tried to wake him up with stimulants.
[01:31:11.440 --> 01:31:15.440]  The combination tragically resulted in the animal's death.
[01:31:15.440 --> 01:31:21.440]  It was a painful reminder that drugging and chipping living creatures can be dangerous and sometimes deadly.
[01:31:21.440 --> 01:31:30.440]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.440 --> 01:31:35.440]  I lost my son, my uncle, on September 11, 2000.
[01:31:35.440 --> 01:31:39.440]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.440 --> 01:31:43.440]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.440 --> 01:31:50.440]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7, over 1,200 architects and engineers
[01:31:50.440 --> 01:31:53.440]  had looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.440 --> 01:31:56.440]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my son.
[01:31:56.440 --> 01:32:01.440]  Go to buildingwatch.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.440 --> 01:32:05.440]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.440 --> 01:32:10.440]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.440 --> 01:32:13.440]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:17.440]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.440 --> 01:32:20.440]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.440 --> 01:32:26.440]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.440 --> 01:32:29.440]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.440 --> 01:32:34.440]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.440 --> 01:32:36.440]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.440 --> 01:32:40.440]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.440 --> 01:32:41.440]  and ordering your copies today.
[01:32:41.440 --> 01:32:46.440]  By ordering now, you will receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:46.440 --> 01:32:51.440]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.440 --> 01:32:55.440]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.440 --> 01:32:59.440]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:32:59.440 --> 01:33:11.440]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.440 --> 01:33:58.440]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:33:58.440 --> 01:34:00.440]  He is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:00.440 --> 01:34:03.440]  We got half an hour left in this show.
[01:34:03.440 --> 01:34:05.440]  So let's see where we're going from here.
[01:34:05.440 --> 01:34:08.440]  All right, back to Truth Reader.
[01:34:08.440 --> 01:34:09.440]  All right, Reader, go ahead.
[01:34:09.440 --> 01:34:12.440]  All right Eddie, yeah, I don't take much of your time.
[01:34:12.440 --> 01:34:16.440]  I just called and checked in, but it doesn't let you know what's going on.
[01:34:16.440 --> 01:34:19.440]  As I said, I just got a new one going on right now.
[01:34:19.440 --> 01:34:25.440]  Two months ago, he pulled me over at this two-box playhouse and took my property again with no crime or anything to that.
[01:34:25.440 --> 01:34:33.440]  So I'm looking at USC of California 42, 1983.
[01:34:33.440 --> 01:34:34.440]  That's what I'm doing.
[01:34:34.440 --> 01:34:37.440]  I'm saying that's what I should do right at that.
[01:34:37.440 --> 01:34:38.440]  That's my only question.
[01:34:38.440 --> 01:34:40.440]  That's what I should go for.
[01:34:40.440 --> 01:34:41.440]  Well, that depends.
[01:34:41.440 --> 01:34:50.440]  I mean, 1983, 1984, and all depends on what you're trying to make a claim as to what they did or didn't do.
[01:34:50.440 --> 01:34:54.440]  A lawful seizure or removal of my property.
[01:34:54.440 --> 01:34:58.440]  Well, okay.
[01:34:58.440 --> 01:34:59.440]  So that's what I would go with, right?
[01:34:59.440 --> 01:35:01.440]  I would go with the USC 42.
[01:35:01.440 --> 01:35:07.440]  Read 1983 and 84 and see which one is more applicable, if not both.
[01:35:07.440 --> 01:35:09.440]  Okay.
[01:35:09.440 --> 01:35:10.440]  All right.
[01:35:10.440 --> 01:35:14.440]  Well, I just hope you're having a better start to the year.
[01:35:14.440 --> 01:35:17.440]  Have you been listening to the show tonight?
[01:35:17.440 --> 01:35:18.440]  Yeah.
[01:35:18.440 --> 01:35:21.440]  Okay, what do you think?
[01:35:21.440 --> 01:35:24.440]  I'm struggling.
[01:35:24.440 --> 01:35:26.440]  I hear frustration and what you're saying.
[01:35:26.440 --> 01:35:32.440]  I heard the beginning of your monologue at the beginning that this world has gone absolutely mad.
[01:35:32.440 --> 01:35:36.440]  And when the people come around saying that you're mad, they're mad.
[01:35:36.440 --> 01:35:39.440]  And you know, we're in deep duty.
[01:35:39.440 --> 01:35:42.440]  Yeah, we are that.
[01:35:42.440 --> 01:35:43.440]  Yeah.
[01:35:43.440 --> 01:35:45.440]  So, yeah, I didn't want to take up much of your time.
[01:35:45.440 --> 01:35:47.440]  I just wanted to check in and let you know what's going on.
[01:35:47.440 --> 01:35:49.440]  But I got a new one and what to do.
[01:35:49.440 --> 01:35:50.440]  Okay.
[01:35:50.440 --> 01:35:51.440]  All right.
[01:35:51.440 --> 01:35:52.440]  All right.
[01:35:52.440 --> 01:35:53.440]  Thank you for going here.
[01:35:53.440 --> 01:35:55.440]  And as usual, God bless.
[01:35:55.440 --> 01:35:56.440]  You too.
[01:35:56.440 --> 01:35:57.440]  Bye-bye.
[01:35:57.440 --> 01:35:58.440]  Bye-bye.
[01:35:58.440 --> 01:36:00.440]  All right.
[01:36:00.440 --> 01:36:06.440]  Now we have, well, it looks like Kaleeb in Maryland.
[01:36:06.440 --> 01:36:08.440]  Kaleeb, is that correct?
[01:36:08.440 --> 01:36:09.440]  Yes, sir.
[01:36:09.440 --> 01:36:10.440]  Okay.
[01:36:10.440 --> 01:36:11.440]  What can we do for you?
[01:36:11.440 --> 01:36:14.440]  Hey, what's going on, Mr. Craig?
[01:36:14.440 --> 01:36:16.440]  The same old, same old.
[01:36:16.440 --> 01:36:17.440]  Okay.
[01:36:17.440 --> 01:36:21.440]  SSDD, you familiar with that one?
[01:36:21.440 --> 01:36:22.440]  SSDD?
[01:36:22.440 --> 01:36:23.440]  Yep.
[01:36:23.440 --> 01:36:25.440]  No, sir.
[01:36:25.440 --> 01:36:28.440]  Same stuff, different day?
[01:36:28.440 --> 01:36:29.440]  Okay.
[01:36:29.440 --> 01:36:30.440]  Yes, yes, yes.
[01:36:30.440 --> 01:36:31.440]  Well, I ain't going to hold you.
[01:36:31.440 --> 01:36:32.440]  I'm going to get right to it.
[01:36:32.440 --> 01:36:38.440]  So I was listening to your video and I put a lot of piece together there.
[01:36:38.440 --> 01:36:41.440]  I was already researching before I even seen your video.
[01:36:41.440 --> 01:36:45.440]  So I don't have a state license plate on my car.
[01:36:45.440 --> 01:36:49.440]  I have a license plate that says private, not for hire.
[01:36:49.440 --> 01:36:52.440]  I was in October, I was leaving out of store.
[01:36:52.440 --> 01:36:56.440]  And when I was getting in my car, police officer was behind me.
[01:36:56.440 --> 01:36:58.440]  I parked in front of the store.
[01:36:58.440 --> 01:36:59.440]  I pulled over.
[01:36:59.440 --> 01:37:00.440]  He stayed behind me.
[01:37:00.440 --> 01:37:05.440]  Now, as he got out of the car, he said he asked for my license registration.
[01:37:05.440 --> 01:37:08.440]  And I explained to him before I continued.
[01:37:08.440 --> 01:37:09.440]  It was, I have a paper.
[01:37:09.440 --> 01:37:11.440]  It's called a statement for police.
[01:37:11.440 --> 01:37:16.440]  And it's other notices declaration, which basically is, it says exactly what you're
[01:37:16.440 --> 01:37:20.440]  saying for real, how you not engage the transportation, how I'm not willing to
[01:37:20.440 --> 01:37:21.440]  incriminate myself.
[01:37:21.440 --> 01:37:23.440]  So I provided that to the officer.
[01:37:23.440 --> 01:37:25.440]  He called the supervisor.
[01:37:25.440 --> 01:37:26.440]  The supervisor came.
[01:37:26.440 --> 01:37:28.440]  I tried to explain that to him.
[01:37:28.440 --> 01:37:33.440]  He wasn't trying to really see or listen to anything that I was saying for real.
[01:37:33.440 --> 01:37:34.440]  And I did record it.
[01:37:34.440 --> 01:37:35.440]  I did record everything.
[01:37:35.440 --> 01:37:37.440]  I didn't give him a name.
[01:37:37.440 --> 01:37:39.440]  Didn't give him a license.
[01:37:39.440 --> 01:37:40.440]  Didn't give him anything.
[01:37:40.440 --> 01:37:42.440]  They told my car.
[01:37:42.440 --> 01:37:46.440]  And when he told me he got the car, got out of the car.
[01:37:46.440 --> 01:37:52.440]  And when I spoke to the officer, he said that they want to tow my car to a
[01:37:52.440 --> 01:37:53.440]  abandoned vehicle.
[01:37:53.440 --> 01:37:57.440]  And because you didn't give us a name or license, you're free to go.
[01:37:57.440 --> 01:38:00.440]  So I was one put in a 1983 lawsuit.
[01:38:00.440 --> 01:38:03.440]  And I just wanted to know if you had any advice.
[01:38:03.440 --> 01:38:08.440]  Well, the thing is, you need to first find the case law that says the cop
[01:38:08.440 --> 01:38:11.440]  should not allow the tow car unless it's for the specific purpose of
[01:38:11.440 --> 01:38:15.440]  evidence or because it's a safety hazard to the public.
[01:38:15.440 --> 01:38:20.440]  And usually when they tow cars from these traffic stops, it's retaliatory.
[01:38:20.440 --> 01:38:23.440]  It's not because they have any lawful authority or need to do it.
[01:38:23.440 --> 01:38:25.440]  It's because they're retaliating.
[01:38:25.440 --> 01:38:28.440]  If they can't get you one way, they're going to get you another.
[01:38:28.440 --> 01:38:29.440]  Okay?
[01:38:29.440 --> 01:38:30.440]  Yeah.
[01:38:30.440 --> 01:38:33.440]  So you need to find the case law on that.
[01:38:33.440 --> 01:38:36.440]  You need to make sure you understand the Maryland law that supports your
[01:38:36.440 --> 01:38:39.440]  position and how to argue it, okay?
[01:38:39.440 --> 01:38:43.440]  Because you're going to have to present that as part of the grounds for why
[01:38:43.440 --> 01:38:47.440]  your suit should not be dismissed and why the officer does not have
[01:38:47.440 --> 01:38:48.440]  qualified immunity.
[01:38:48.440 --> 01:38:52.440]  The officer is required to know the law and he's required to properly
[01:38:52.440 --> 01:38:53.440]  apply the law.
[01:38:53.440 --> 01:38:57.440]  This is not a question of a simple mistake of law, okay?
[01:38:57.440 --> 01:39:00.440]  Which is how they're going to try to spin this.
[01:39:00.440 --> 01:39:04.440]  The other thing is, is here in Texas, an officer must be specifically
[01:39:04.440 --> 01:39:08.440]  certified by the state police to enforce traffic.
[01:39:08.440 --> 01:39:11.440]  They can't do it just because they're cops.
[01:39:11.440 --> 01:39:15.440]  So you need to find out whether or not Maryland has similar statutes.
[01:39:15.440 --> 01:39:20.440]  So start looking at the administrative code for your state that has a
[01:39:20.440 --> 01:39:22.440]  chapter governing your state police department.
[01:39:22.440 --> 01:39:25.440]  Here they're called the Department of Public Safety.
[01:39:25.440 --> 01:39:28.440]  They may be state police in Maryland or they may be Department of Public
[01:39:28.440 --> 01:39:29.440]  Safety in Maryland.
[01:39:29.440 --> 01:39:34.440]  But you need to read through that and find out what is their law as far as
[01:39:34.440 --> 01:39:35.440]  their duties go.
[01:39:35.440 --> 01:39:40.440]  Here in Texas it specifically says their duty relates to commercial and
[01:39:40.440 --> 01:39:43.440]  for hire traffic when it comes to regulatory programs.
[01:39:43.440 --> 01:39:49.440]  And every regulatory program in the code is DPS when it comes to license,
[01:39:49.440 --> 01:39:54.440]  financial responsibility, and safety inspection, okay?
[01:39:54.440 --> 01:39:59.440]  So you've got to tie all those pieces together for your federal lawsuit
[01:39:59.440 --> 01:40:03.440]  to show why the officer was acting under color of law and he should have
[01:40:03.440 --> 01:40:04.440]  known better.
[01:40:04.440 --> 01:40:07.440]  If you can't do that, you're going to get the case thrown out and you're
[01:40:07.440 --> 01:40:09.440]  not going to be able to sue and get anything.
[01:40:09.440 --> 01:40:11.440]  And it's going to cost you money to file it.
[01:40:11.440 --> 01:40:13.440]  And I understand that.
[01:40:13.440 --> 01:40:15.440]  So I wanted to add one quick piece.
[01:40:15.440 --> 01:40:17.440]  I wanted to know your opinion on it.
[01:40:17.440 --> 01:40:23.440]  So the first thing I have, it says, oh, I'm just reading as quick as I can.
[01:40:23.440 --> 01:40:28.440]  It says, if you do not, based on start off, notice the declaration,
[01:40:28.440 --> 01:40:33.440]  I revoke, rescind, cancel, and void and do not consent to any power of attorney
[01:40:33.440 --> 01:40:34.440]  I may have authorized.
[01:40:34.440 --> 01:40:38.440]  I declare and claim Article III court jurisdiction.
[01:40:38.440 --> 01:40:41.440]  If you do not know what this is, then verify with your supervisor if they
[01:40:41.440 --> 01:40:46.440]  wish to be responsible for your actions before making an unauthorizable legal
[01:40:46.440 --> 01:40:49.440]  determination which makes place you, your supervisor, and the Secretary of
[01:40:49.440 --> 01:40:54.440]  State and Article III impeachable felony situation which is treason.
[01:40:54.440 --> 01:40:58.440]  You are in violation of your job at open office the moment you declared an
[01:40:58.440 --> 01:41:01.440]  emergency by turning on a red light to stop me, which is a felony where there
[01:41:01.440 --> 01:41:03.440]  is no emergency.
[01:41:03.440 --> 01:41:05.440]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:41:05.440 --> 01:41:08.440]  Where do you see it's a felony?
[01:41:08.440 --> 01:41:12.440]  The state law in which they're operating has to say it's a felony before it's
[01:41:12.440 --> 01:41:14.440]  a felony.
[01:41:14.440 --> 01:41:16.440]  Okay?
[01:41:16.440 --> 01:41:17.440]  Here's the thing.
[01:41:17.440 --> 01:41:20.440]  Whatever you tried to give him is irrelevant.
[01:41:20.440 --> 01:41:25.440]  It's not going to bear one way or the other on the outcome of the lawsuit.
[01:41:25.440 --> 01:41:30.440]  All that's going to matter is where you can show that the law supports your
[01:41:30.440 --> 01:41:35.440]  specific rights and version of events versus how the officer did it and that
[01:41:35.440 --> 01:41:41.440]  his lack of knowledge is not going to entitle him to any form of immunity
[01:41:41.440 --> 01:41:46.440]  because it is knowledge he is required to have and that any reasonable officer
[01:41:46.440 --> 01:41:51.440]  should know that they're required to have and should properly apply because of
[01:41:51.440 --> 01:41:53.440]  it.
[01:41:53.440 --> 01:41:57.440]  Those are the things you're going to have to be able to prove up to avoid a
[01:41:57.440 --> 01:42:01.440]  qualified immunity dismissal.
[01:42:01.440 --> 01:42:03.440]  Okay.
[01:42:03.440 --> 01:42:06.440]  Okay, because the moment you file your lawsuit, I guarantee you the very first
[01:42:06.440 --> 01:42:11.440]  thing you're going to see is a 12B6 motion to dismiss for failure state of
[01:42:11.440 --> 01:42:17.440]  claim or for some form of immunity.
[01:42:17.440 --> 01:42:19.440]  Okay.
[01:42:19.440 --> 01:42:23.440]  That's why it's important that you find out whether or not the state police
[01:42:23.440 --> 01:42:27.440]  must specifically certify a local police department or a county police
[01:42:27.440 --> 01:42:32.440]  department to enforce the law when it comes to those codes because the
[01:42:32.440 --> 01:42:39.440]  officer can't claim official or qualified immunity if his duty is not
[01:42:39.440 --> 01:42:44.440]  sanctioned by or what he did is not sanctioned by law.
[01:42:44.440 --> 01:42:49.440]  If the law didn't give him the authority to do what he was doing or give the
[01:42:49.440 --> 01:42:52.440]  appearance that he had the authority to do what he was doing, then he doesn't
[01:42:52.440 --> 01:42:58.440]  have it and his presumption of having it is absolutely irrelevant and that's
[01:42:58.440 --> 01:43:00.440]  his fault.
[01:43:00.440 --> 01:43:02.440]  See what I'm saying?
[01:43:02.440 --> 01:43:03.440]  Okay.
[01:43:03.440 --> 01:43:05.440]  Okay, so let me just, all right, so one quick thing.
[01:43:05.440 --> 01:43:09.440]  So I was going to approach it as, you know, I have a cross examination
[01:43:09.440 --> 01:43:10.440]  script.
[01:43:10.440 --> 01:43:15.440]  I was going to approach it as he didn't have any reasonable suspicion that I
[01:43:15.440 --> 01:43:18.440]  was engaged in any commercial activity.
[01:43:18.440 --> 01:43:23.440]  Well, you have to have the state law to be able to use it to show that that is
[01:43:23.440 --> 01:43:26.440]  the elemental requirement for such an offense.
[01:43:26.440 --> 01:43:30.440]  Okay, here in Texas it's easy because it says the single subject that all those
[01:43:30.440 --> 01:43:35.440]  laws must adhere to is transportation, which is commerce.
[01:43:35.440 --> 01:43:40.440]  You have to make sure that the law in Maryland says the same thing and that
[01:43:40.440 --> 01:43:44.440]  will be in the title of the bill that was used to enact those laws.
[01:43:44.440 --> 01:43:46.440]  So you've got to do your research here.
[01:43:46.440 --> 01:43:49.440]  It's not going to be in the statutes.
[01:43:49.440 --> 01:43:54.440]  It's only going to appear in the title of the bill that created those statutes.
[01:43:54.440 --> 01:43:57.440]  Hang on and we'll be right back to wrap this up.
[01:43:57.440 --> 01:44:00.440]  Okay.
[01:44:27.440 --> 01:44:29.440]  Thank you very much.
[01:44:57.440 --> 01:45:00.440]  Increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:27.440 --> 01:45:29.440]  Thank you.
[01:45:57.440 --> 01:46:01.440]  It's a free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:28.440 --> 01:46:30.440]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:30.440 --> 01:46:33.440]  We are now in the last segment of the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with
[01:46:33.440 --> 01:46:37.440]  your host Eddie Craig and we are talking to Khalid in Maryland.
[01:46:37.440 --> 01:46:40.440]  All right, Khalid.
[01:46:40.440 --> 01:46:42.440]  Okay, so I'm looking up on the public safety.
[01:46:42.440 --> 01:46:47.440]  Yes, I'm seeing that transportation is located under the Department of Public
[01:46:47.440 --> 01:46:49.440]  Safety in Maryland.
[01:46:49.440 --> 01:46:50.440]  Right.
[01:46:50.440 --> 01:46:55.440]  So the code you need to look at, whatever code or title is your transportation
[01:46:55.440 --> 01:46:59.440]  code, you need to find out what bill was used to enact that code as it currently
[01:46:59.440 --> 01:47:00.440]  exists.
[01:47:00.440 --> 01:47:03.440]  Then you need to go find that actual bill, legislative bill.
[01:47:03.440 --> 01:47:05.440]  Start with your Secretary of State.
[01:47:05.440 --> 01:47:10.440]  In there, you're going to need at least two things, certified copies of that
[01:47:10.440 --> 01:47:11.440]  bill.
[01:47:11.440 --> 01:47:15.440]  You're going to need a certified copy of the bill, caption or title if your
[01:47:15.440 --> 01:47:20.440]  Constitution says that every piece of legislation must have a single subject
[01:47:20.440 --> 01:47:21.440]  clause.
[01:47:21.440 --> 01:47:22.440]  Okay.
[01:47:22.440 --> 01:47:26.440]  And you're going to need the signature pages showing where that bill was signed into
[01:47:26.440 --> 01:47:27.440]  law.
[01:47:27.440 --> 01:47:28.440]  All right.
[01:47:28.440 --> 01:47:29.440]  Okay.
[01:47:29.440 --> 01:47:33.440]  Now, if there are other requirements such as a reading rule over a certain number
[01:47:33.440 --> 01:47:38.440]  of days before the bill can have the force and effective law and whether or not
[01:47:38.440 --> 01:47:42.440]  there can be an emergency suspension of such rules, you're going to need any pages
[01:47:42.440 --> 01:47:48.440]  or signatures that would have suspended that reading and a copy of the emergency clause
[01:47:48.440 --> 01:47:54.440]  was used and make sure that it's a clause that is authorized by the language of your
[01:47:54.440 --> 01:47:55.440]  Constitution.
[01:47:55.440 --> 01:47:58.440]  Because here in Texas, they're doing that all the time.
[01:47:58.440 --> 01:48:00.440]  They've been doing it since 63.
[01:48:00.440 --> 01:48:04.440]  They've been suspending the reading of laws, but they've been using a bogus
[01:48:04.440 --> 01:48:09.440]  emergency clause to do it, making every law they've enacted since then absolutely
[01:48:09.440 --> 01:48:13.440]  unconstitutional if they suspended that reading rule.
[01:48:13.440 --> 01:48:14.440]  Okay.
[01:48:14.440 --> 01:48:15.440]  All right.
[01:48:15.440 --> 01:48:19.440]  There's a lot of stuff you got to do to get your ducks in a row and get your homework
[01:48:19.440 --> 01:48:20.440]  done.
[01:48:20.440 --> 01:48:21.440]  Believe me.
[01:48:21.440 --> 01:48:22.440]  Yeah.
[01:48:22.440 --> 01:48:24.440]  That's what I need to do now.
[01:48:24.440 --> 01:48:25.440]  Yeah.
[01:48:25.440 --> 01:48:28.440]  Unfortunately, you may have waited too long because I'm not kidding you when I tell
[01:48:28.440 --> 01:48:33.440]  you there's a lot of dots to connect and you got to be able to connect them flawlessly.
[01:48:33.440 --> 01:48:34.440]  Okay.
[01:48:34.440 --> 01:48:41.440]  So, is there a way, is there a way to reach you on Facebook so I can ask the mother
[01:48:41.440 --> 01:48:44.440]  question so I don't hold up this on this call?
[01:48:44.440 --> 01:48:49.440]  The only thing you can do is send me an email and I can't guarantee when or if I'm going
[01:48:49.440 --> 01:48:50.440]  to be able to respond to them.
[01:48:50.440 --> 01:48:52.440]  I get hundreds of emails a day.
[01:48:52.440 --> 01:48:54.440]  I can't keep up with what I've got.
[01:48:54.440 --> 01:48:58.440]  I'm going blind on this damn computer doing this stuff, but that's the best way to do
[01:48:58.440 --> 01:49:03.440]  it is send me an email to eddyddieatruleoflawradio.com.
[01:49:03.440 --> 01:49:04.440]  Okay.
[01:49:04.440 --> 01:49:12.440]  So, look up single subject clause and my island constitution and look up an emergency clause.
[01:49:12.440 --> 01:49:19.440]  And see, well, under the legislative branch provision of your state constitution, you
[01:49:19.440 --> 01:49:24.440]  should have everything dealing with the single subject and everything the legislature is
[01:49:24.440 --> 01:49:29.440]  required to do to properly and constitutionally enact the bill into law.
[01:49:29.440 --> 01:49:35.440]  It'll tell them how that bill has to be done, how that bill must originate, what committees
[01:49:35.440 --> 01:49:41.440]  or panels it must go through, what procedural rules are required, and when and if they can
[01:49:41.440 --> 01:49:43.440]  follow those rules and under what set of conditions.
[01:49:43.440 --> 01:49:46.440]  All those are things you're going to need to know.
[01:49:46.440 --> 01:49:52.440]  So, read everything in that legislative department section of your constitution.
[01:49:52.440 --> 01:49:53.440]  Everything.
[01:49:53.440 --> 01:49:54.440]  Everything.
[01:49:54.440 --> 01:49:55.440]  Okay.
[01:49:55.440 --> 01:49:56.440]  Okay.
[01:49:56.440 --> 01:50:00.440]  So, I need to follow these motions before I go in the court?
[01:50:00.440 --> 01:50:06.440]  Well, you have to follow suit in order to go in the court to begin with if you're talking
[01:50:06.440 --> 01:50:07.440]  about suing.
[01:50:07.440 --> 01:50:10.440]  Now, if you're talking about defending the case, then absolutely you're going to have to
[01:50:10.440 --> 01:50:11.440]  put your hand.
[01:50:11.440 --> 01:50:12.440]  Okay.
[01:50:12.440 --> 01:50:13.440]  Yeah, I already filed a suit.
[01:50:13.440 --> 01:50:17.440]  So, basically print out the bills and put them in.
[01:50:17.440 --> 01:50:20.440]  Well, yeah, you're going to have to get your evidence together.
[01:50:20.440 --> 01:50:25.440]  You're going to need certified copies of all public records, which the bill is, and so
[01:50:25.440 --> 01:50:29.440]  on and so forth, but you're not going to want the entire bill, especially if it's hundreds
[01:50:29.440 --> 01:50:34.440]  or thousands of pages long, because that's going to cost you an arm and a leg.
[01:50:34.440 --> 01:50:40.440]  All you need are the relevant pages that contain the information that facilitates your suit.
[01:50:40.440 --> 01:50:45.440]  All you got to do is have the Secretary of State certify that this is the caption of this
[01:50:45.440 --> 01:50:50.440]  bill, which created this code or title of law.
[01:50:50.440 --> 01:50:51.440]  Okay.
[01:50:51.440 --> 01:50:52.440]  So, I see what you said.
[01:50:52.440 --> 01:50:58.440]  So, you said go to the Secretary of State, get a certified copy showing which bill enacted
[01:50:58.440 --> 01:50:59.440]  the transportation code.
[01:50:59.440 --> 01:51:00.440]  No, no, no.
[01:51:00.440 --> 01:51:06.440]  Find out which bill did that and what year, and then you go to them and ask for a certified
[01:51:06.440 --> 01:51:13.440]  copy of the bill caption or title, whatever your Constitution calls it, any emergency
[01:51:13.440 --> 01:51:17.440]  clause, what page that's on, you're going to need to read the bill to find out.
[01:51:17.440 --> 01:51:18.440]  Okay.
[01:51:18.440 --> 01:51:22.440]  And you're going to find out whether or not they suspended the reading rule if there is
[01:51:22.440 --> 01:51:28.440]  one, or any of the other rules they're required to do before that bill could become law.
[01:51:28.440 --> 01:51:32.440]  And if they did suspend them, what is the criteria for doing so?
[01:51:32.440 --> 01:51:37.440]  And where in that law did they do it, and did they do it properly?
[01:51:37.440 --> 01:51:42.440]  If they didn't, then you're going to want a copy of where they didn't do it properly to
[01:51:42.440 --> 01:51:47.440]  prove that it's not a valid law, and thus it's unenforceable.
[01:51:47.440 --> 01:51:48.440]  Okay.
[01:51:48.440 --> 01:51:49.440]  Okay.
[01:51:49.440 --> 01:51:52.440]  I got a lot to do.
[01:51:52.440 --> 01:51:53.440]  Yep.
[01:51:53.440 --> 01:51:58.440]  You may only get to sue the cop, but you may get to challenge certain state law in that
[01:51:58.440 --> 01:52:03.440]  code as being unconstitutional on its face under both the state and federal Constitution
[01:52:03.440 --> 01:52:04.440]  because it violates rights.
[01:52:04.440 --> 01:52:07.440]  That's the link you're going to have to make in the federal court.
[01:52:07.440 --> 01:52:11.440]  In the state court, you can just say it violates these provisions of the state Constitution.
[01:52:11.440 --> 01:52:16.440]  In federal court, you've got to say, not only does it violate these provisions of the state
[01:52:16.440 --> 01:52:21.440]  Constitution, but it creates a rights issue of rights protected by the federal government
[01:52:21.440 --> 01:52:28.440]  when I am unlawfully searched and seized under a law that's not a law.
[01:52:28.440 --> 01:52:29.440]  Okay.
[01:52:29.440 --> 01:52:30.440]  Okay.
[01:52:30.440 --> 01:52:33.440]  So I just want to make sure I got everything one more time.
[01:52:33.440 --> 01:52:36.440]  So look in the bill for the legislative part of Maryland.
[01:52:36.440 --> 01:52:42.440]  Look for the bill that speaks on the law that opened up the bill for transportation in Maryland.
[01:52:42.440 --> 01:52:44.440]  Get a certified copy of that.
[01:52:44.440 --> 01:52:49.440]  Then look for the emergency clause to see if it's still being read, and if it's not, get
[01:52:49.440 --> 01:52:52.440]  a certified copy of that and enter that in the evidence.
[01:52:52.440 --> 01:52:57.440]  Yeah, you have to read what the requirements of enacting the law are.
[01:52:57.440 --> 01:53:03.440]  Then you have to see whether or not the legislature followed every one of them.
[01:53:03.440 --> 01:53:04.440]  That's a simple way to put it.
[01:53:04.440 --> 01:53:09.440]  That's why you have to read everything in the legislative article of your Constitution
[01:53:09.440 --> 01:53:13.440]  to see what their requirements are from making the law, and then you have to look at the
[01:53:13.440 --> 01:53:18.440]  actual law they passed and see if they followed them the way they were supposed to.
[01:53:18.440 --> 01:53:19.440]  Okay.
[01:53:19.440 --> 01:53:27.440]  And they can't follow just some of them unless the Constitution says that this is optional.
[01:53:27.440 --> 01:53:33.440]  But if it says they shall do it, or they are required to do it, or they must do it, then
[01:53:33.440 --> 01:53:36.440]  it's not optional.
[01:53:36.440 --> 01:53:37.440]  Okay.
[01:53:37.440 --> 01:53:38.440]  Okay.
[01:53:38.440 --> 01:53:43.440]  And for the federal seat, would I have to look how it was followed?
[01:53:43.440 --> 01:53:49.440]  You have to show how the state violation affected the federally protected rights when the officer
[01:53:49.440 --> 01:53:55.440]  seized you, which is a fourth and fifth amendment issue, unlawful search and seizure, false
[01:53:55.440 --> 01:54:01.440]  imprisonment, the taking of your property, trying to make you to testify against yourself
[01:54:01.440 --> 01:54:06.440]  in a court of law, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:54:06.440 --> 01:54:07.440]  Okay.
[01:54:07.440 --> 01:54:11.440]  I'm looking it up right now, and I will see how it applies.
[01:54:11.440 --> 01:54:14.440]  And I'll try to file for certified copy.
[01:54:14.440 --> 01:54:17.440]  And if I got any questions, I'll just call back next week.
[01:54:17.440 --> 01:54:18.440]  I appreciate all the advice.
[01:54:18.440 --> 01:54:19.440]  All right, sir.
[01:54:19.440 --> 01:54:21.440]  If you could help me out, I would have went ahead looking crazy.
[01:54:21.440 --> 01:54:22.440]  All right.
[01:54:22.440 --> 01:54:23.440]  Well, good luck.
[01:54:23.440 --> 01:54:24.440]  All right.
[01:54:24.440 --> 01:54:25.440]  Thank you.
[01:54:25.440 --> 01:54:26.440]  Enjoy the evening.
[01:54:26.440 --> 01:54:27.440]  You too.
[01:54:27.440 --> 01:54:28.440]  Bye-bye.
[01:54:28.440 --> 01:54:29.440]  All right.
[01:54:29.440 --> 01:54:30.440]  Bye.
[01:54:30.440 --> 01:54:31.440]  All right.
[01:54:31.440 --> 01:54:35.440]  Now, we've got four minutes left, so that'll be it for the callers as I'm the last caller
[01:54:35.440 --> 01:54:36.440]  on the board anyway.
[01:54:36.440 --> 01:54:37.440]  All right, folks.
[01:54:37.440 --> 01:54:42.440]  I hate to be so depressing on those beginning monologues at times, but if you look around,
[01:54:42.440 --> 01:54:49.440]  I don't know how you can avoid being depressed at the state of things, because it bothers
[01:54:49.440 --> 01:54:56.440]  me that we as Americans do not take a bigger interest and concern in what is happening
[01:54:56.440 --> 01:55:02.440]  here and how we're not more up in arms literally about it.
[01:55:02.440 --> 01:55:08.000]  It's like the entire bill of rights that was put in place that authorizes us to do whatever
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:14.840]  is necessary to protect our rights from a government that abuses them is to be treated
[01:55:14.840 --> 01:55:23.440]  as if it's a permission slip that the government that it was meant to protect us from can revoke
[01:55:23.440 --> 01:55:25.740]  by its own declaration.
[01:55:25.740 --> 01:55:26.740]  That's not right.
[01:55:26.740 --> 01:55:29.040]  That's not the way this was set up to work.
[01:55:29.040 --> 01:55:33.920]  That's not what the founding fathers intended, it's not what they meant, never was.
[01:55:33.920 --> 01:55:41.540]  And I am sick and tired to death of people that want to willfully misread, misapply,
[01:55:41.540 --> 01:55:50.040]  and misunderstand things so that they can exercise a power over me that they were never intended
[01:55:50.040 --> 01:55:51.840]  to have.
[01:55:51.840 --> 01:55:56.720]  And I never intended to give them.
[01:55:56.720 --> 01:56:04.080]  I certainly did not consent to anyone else giving them in my place.
[01:56:04.080 --> 01:56:10.680]  Folks, we've got too many people in too many places of power that don't understand the
[01:56:10.680 --> 01:56:21.960]  most basic concept of morals, ethics, right, wrong, liberty, individual rights, individual
[01:56:21.960 --> 01:56:28.120]  freedoms, and infringement on any of those things.
[01:56:28.120 --> 01:56:33.600]  They don't understand the most basic tenets of those.
[01:56:33.600 --> 01:56:46.920]  And yet they claim that their authority is irrefutable, undeniable, and all-powerful.
[01:56:46.920 --> 01:56:53.240]  That is not America.
[01:56:53.240 --> 01:56:57.600]  It's not supposed to be.
[01:56:57.600 --> 01:57:03.680]  So that being said, ladies and gentlemen, I hope that all the things that you have learned
[01:57:03.680 --> 01:57:12.920]  from us so far are igniting a fire within you to know what is happening and who is responsible
[01:57:12.920 --> 01:57:19.960]  and a willingness to do something about it, because the few of us that understand a lot
[01:57:19.960 --> 01:57:25.880]  of what's going on and have seen it for ourselves, as much as we want to fight back, the one
[01:57:25.880 --> 01:57:32.760]  thing we know for sure is that we cannot do it alone.
[01:57:32.760 --> 01:57:36.560]  If you try to do it alone, you're the one that gets painted crazy, you're the one that
[01:57:36.560 --> 01:57:40.280]  gets painted as the demon and the bad guy, and you're the one that's made to look like
[01:57:40.280 --> 01:57:44.720]  the problem rather than the solution.
[01:57:44.720 --> 01:57:48.320]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, isn't helping anybody.
[01:57:48.320 --> 01:57:52.640]  So we either have to all stand up together or we're all going to get buried together.
[01:57:52.640 --> 01:57:55.920]  It's the only way this is going to work.
[01:57:55.920 --> 01:58:01.480]  All right, I hope this has been a show worth hearing for y'all out there.
[01:58:01.480 --> 01:58:08.560]  I want y'all to have a great week, and may all your hopes, dreams, and blessings be there
[01:58:08.560 --> 01:58:10.600]  for you day in and day out.
[01:58:10.600 --> 01:58:15.040]  Y'all take care, and I will see you next Monday night on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:15.040 --> 01:58:16.040]  This is your host, A. Craig.
[01:58:16.040 --> 01:58:46.000]  Have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:46.040 --> 01:59:15.880]  God bless you all, and God bless you all, and God bless you all.
[01:59:15.880 --> 01:59:16.880]  Thank you.
[01:59:16.880 --> 01:59:46.720]  Thank you very much.