[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown
[00:07.000 --> 00:10.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 14th of November, 2018
[00:10.000 --> 00:20.000]  Opened with precious metals at $1,203.05 Silver, $14.05 Copper, $2.69 Platinum, $840.05
[00:20.000 --> 00:30.000]  Platinum, $1,136.20 Rodiums, $2,515.00 Oil, $55.69
[00:30.000 --> 00:39.000]  Brent crude, $65.47 Crypto, $6,244.16 Ethereum, $194.90
[00:39.000 --> 00:49.000]  XRP, $0.48 Bitcoin Cash, $473.16 XLM, $0.24 Eos, $4.93
[00:49.000 --> 00:53.000]  And Litecoins at $48.21 Crypto Coin
[00:53.000 --> 01:03.000]  Today in History, the year 1922, the British Broadcasting Company, or BBC, begins radio transmissions in the United Kingdom.
[01:03.000 --> 01:07.000]  Today in History
[01:07.000 --> 01:14.000]  In recent news, Houston set a new record for first snowfall, breaking one set on November 23, 1979
[01:14.000 --> 01:21.000]  beating places like New York City and Boston to give you some perspective. A consequence of a near record breaking cold front in the south
[01:21.000 --> 01:26.000]  with temperatures in the state plummeting 25 degrees or more below the yearly average.
[01:26.000 --> 01:32.000]  Freeze warnings are in effect for a large part of the state, including stretching into New Mexico, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
[01:32.000 --> 01:44.000]  Temperatures are expected to chill in the high 30s with forecast by the National Weather Services showing temperatures below freezing late Tuesday and Wednesday.
[01:44.000 --> 01:54.000]  After months of delays and setbacks, Brexit negotiators for Britain and the European Union have fondly drafted an agreement on how the country will exit the political and economic union of Europe.
[01:54.000 --> 02:03.000]  The document is set to be reviewed by an emergency cabinet meeting called by Prime Minister Theresa May for Wednesday afternoon. If the cabinet ends up endorsing Theresa May's proposal,
[02:03.000 --> 02:11.000]  the following agenda would be a Brexit summit attended by leaders of the European Union's remaining 27 member states and Brussels later this month.
[02:11.000 --> 02:19.000]  If approved by European leaders, the treaty would then go to the British Parliament where it faces obstacles concerning Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
[02:19.000 --> 02:24.000]  and the battle between hard-breasted tears and the soft islands.
[02:24.000 --> 02:33.000]  Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, speaking on the potentiality of cryptocurrencies being used by governments at a FinTech conference in Singapore,
[02:33.000 --> 02:42.000]  said that the advantage is clear. Your payment would be immediate, safe, and cheap and potentially semi-anonymous, and central banks would retain a sure footing in payment.
[02:42.000 --> 02:54.000]  In addition, they would offer a more level playing field for competition and a platform for innovation. Meanwhile, your bank or fellow entrepreneurs would have ensured a friendly user experience based on the latest technologies.
[02:54.000 --> 03:13.000]  This was Rick Rowdy with your loadout for November 14, 2018.
[03:13.000 --> 03:37.000]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Roodle Law Radio on this, the 16th day of November, 2018. This Friday, the 16th day of November, 2016, this is our four-hour info marathon on Roodle Law Radio.
[03:37.000 --> 03:44.000]  We do have our phone lines open. They will be open all night. We'll be taking your calls if you have a question or a comment.
[03:44.000 --> 04:00.000]  Give us a call at 512-646-1984, and let me start out by giving an update on the electronic lawyer project.
[04:00.000 --> 04:09.000]  We are in the process of putting together the final presentations for angel funding.
[04:09.000 --> 04:22.000]  We have the project for the most part together. What we're looking at, what we're looking to do, is we're looking to get angel funding.
[04:22.000 --> 04:42.000]  And this angel funding, we're looking for a million dollars for 90 days. We take that initial funding, and then we hire a number of professionals, which includes a law firm, to bring us up to compliance with the Securities and Insurance Commission.
[04:42.000 --> 05:06.000]  We need a set of, or a number of coders and blockchain professionals to put together our blockchain, our Bitcoin, and I'm sorry, Bitcoin, our coin and our securities token offering.
[05:06.000 --> 05:29.000]  But that won't take long. Once we have the professionals in place, we look at, once we get the initial funding three months and we'll be ready for a private sale, and we're maneuvering into a very good position for that purpose.
[05:29.000 --> 05:54.000]  Because there are some circumstances occurring in the community, in the crypto market that we think will be very conducive to increasing the amount of investment we will be able to secure.
[05:54.000 --> 06:10.000]  And that's because, for the most part, the SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission laws, are convoluted and complex.
[06:10.000 --> 06:33.000]  It's not necessary for them to be so complex, but it seems that the legislature and the Exchange Commission went to great trouble to construct a set of codes that no normal human being could read and make sense of.
[06:33.000 --> 06:43.000]  Now, if I sound somewhat critical of the SEC and the legislature, it is criticism that's well founded.
[06:43.000 --> 07:09.000]  If you go to Singapore and pull their securities code, or to Switzerland and pull theirs, these are the other two primary countries that have a set of securities code, a relatively comprehensive set of code that are on par with the United States, you can actually read their codes.
[07:09.000 --> 07:17.000]  Their codes actually make sense. An eighth grader can read their codes and make sense of them.
[07:17.000 --> 07:24.000]  No one can read the US Securities and Exchange Commission code and make sense of them.
[07:24.000 --> 07:42.000]  I was breaking Regulation A exemption down into a questionnaire. Regulation A exemption is supposed to be a simplified method for securing funding.
[07:42.000 --> 07:57.000]  Well, first sentence, 17 CFR 230.251. That's the first statute under Regulation A.
[07:57.000 --> 08:18.000]  First sentence, it asks if you're promoting a security that is registered under 230.261.
[08:18.000 --> 08:34.000]  So now in order to get past that, I have to go to 230.261 and see if the offering is valid under 230.261. So I go to 230.261 and I get through it.
[08:34.000 --> 08:37.000]  It's got about 10 or 15 questions to get through it.
[08:37.000 --> 08:51.000]  And I ask, is it this kind of a token? Is it an offering or is it this kind of a security or this kind of security? If you say yes to any one of those, those are securities that fit within the code.
[08:51.000 --> 09:02.000]  But if you say yes to any one of those, then you go to 2207.1101C and have to go through that one.
[09:02.000 --> 09:08.000]  And then that one sends you to another one and another one. I've got about 100 questions.
[09:08.000 --> 09:37.000]  Before I get past the first half of the first sentence of the regulation, it is a horrible mess. And in the space, in the crypto space, the crypto space is it's clear to everyone that it is poised.
[09:37.000 --> 09:56.000]  To dramatically change everything. Technology is about to take a giant leap into cyberspace. It's going to take a leap away from fiat currencies and the current banking system.
[09:56.000 --> 10:15.000]  It's already occurring. But it started out with a number of technological solutions being launched with an investment vehicle and then the SEC started shutting them down.
[10:15.000 --> 10:27.000]  And people are apparently trying to comply, but the SEC shuts them down anyway. I'm looking through all of the things you've shut down for.
[10:27.000 --> 10:48.000]  One company shut down because they did not provide an adequate bio, a biographical data on the company officers. It's not that they didn't provide one, but the SEC didn't think it was good enough.
[10:48.000 --> 11:01.000]  Another one was shut down because they didn't inform the purchaser that they could lose money on the investment. Are you kidding me?
[11:01.000 --> 11:07.000]  This is an investment and they didn't inform them adequately that they could lose money on the investment.
[11:07.000 --> 11:20.000]  I'm reading through this and we have this company, Munchy. Munchy is one of the most famous recently. Munchy set up their offering.
[11:20.000 --> 11:30.000]  They hired a law firm. You can't launch a sale without a law firm approving the details of the sale.
[11:30.000 --> 11:44.000]  So they went through a securities law firm. A law firm approved the sale. Second day of the sale, the SEC came and shut them down, made them pay all the money back they collected.
[11:44.000 --> 12:06.000]  Because they had a sentence on their white paper that said, if you sell this token, then other people will buy the token and they will trade the tokens and the tokens will gain in value.
[12:06.000 --> 12:23.000]  I've read that on their white paper and thought, are you guys out of your mind of all the red flags? That's the reddest red flag of all the red flags.
[12:23.000 --> 12:46.000]  That is the one thing, if you're doing a token sale that you maintain is exempt from SEC regulation, it absolutely cannot be expected to gain in value or the purchaser cannot be led to believe that it will gain in value.
[12:46.000 --> 13:07.000]  So how on earth did their securities lawyers authorize and approve this marketing procedure when they had the most obvious, blatant red flag on their site that you could possibly have?
[13:07.000 --> 13:24.000]  Well, this kind of terrified everybody, everybody in the space. Everybody in the space or like most people when it comes to law, if people call into the show and they don't know anything about law.
[13:24.000 --> 13:45.000]  So when I start talking to them about law, they think of law like walking into a legal library and there's this huge space with thousands and thousands of books.
[13:45.000 --> 14:06.000]  Where on earth did they start? What did they read? How did they come up to speed? This is impossible. When I'm going to these conventions and when I raise the issue of SEC compliance with these guys, it's clear they're terrified.
[14:06.000 --> 14:29.000]  You know, when I talk to one of these developers, they're for the most part supergeeks, they got great ideas and highly sophisticated technological practices and procedures they're working with and they're just happy as they can be to try to explain all these highly technical issues to me.
[14:29.000 --> 14:44.000]  Well, for the most part I do not have a clue as to what they're talking about. They're using a lot of highly sophisticated terms that they have very specific meanings for, but I have no idea what those terms mean.
[14:44.000 --> 14:54.000]  And I stand here and my eyes kind of go out of focus and I nod politely and pretend like I understand what they're saying and I don't have a clue.
[14:54.000 --> 15:06.000]  But then when I start talking about the SEC regulations, they get exactly the same look. They have no clue. They have no idea where to start.
[15:06.000 --> 15:19.000]  They would have no idea if they went through the code, if they found what all they needed, if they got everything they needed, if they were in compliance or not, they have no way of knowing.
[15:19.000 --> 15:29.000]  And because they have no knowing and they know this is critical to their business, it terrifies them and they want to be somewhere else.
[15:29.000 --> 15:38.000]  So they wind up hitting the road and go and find somebody who will talk about stuff they actually want to talk about. So they're terrified of this area.
[15:38.000 --> 15:54.000]  That appeared to us to be a excellent opportunity. So what we did was took the SEC code and started breaking it down using our technology.
[15:54.000 --> 16:16.000]  Now we can go to these people, primarily what we're producing this for are the investors. Because when I talk to the investors and ask the investors, what criteria did they have for investing in a cryptocurrency?
[16:16.000 --> 16:27.000]  They had no answers for me. The space is too new and they didn't understand the space well enough to have an effective set of criteria.
[16:27.000 --> 16:34.000]  And it seemed to make them uncomfortable that they didn't have a set of criteria that they could articulate.
[16:34.000 --> 16:43.000]  Because when they invest, if the investment fails, they won't have to go to their bosses and explain why they invested in this company and they don't know what to tell them.
[16:43.000 --> 16:49.000]  So we have designed a solution and when we come back on the other side, we'll talk about that solution.
[16:49.000 --> 17:14.000]  This is Randy Kelton with our radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[17:14.000 --> 17:25.000]  Enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:25.000 --> 17:34.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get 4 chances to win.
[17:34.000 --> 17:43.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:43.000 --> 17:52.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:52.000 --> 18:00.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.000 --> 18:09.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:21.000]  Michael Mears has won 6 cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:29.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:29.000 --> 18:39.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:49.000]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:01.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:29.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logos Radio Network.com.
[19:29.000 --> 19:39.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[19:39.000 --> 19:55.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[19:55.000 --> 20:05.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[20:05.000 --> 20:15.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[20:15.000 --> 20:25.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[20:25.000 --> 20:45.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[20:45.000 --> 20:55.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[20:55.000 --> 21:05.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:05.000 --> 21:15.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:15.000 --> 21:25.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:25.000 --> 21:35.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:35.000 --> 21:45.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:45.000 --> 21:55.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[21:55.000 --> 22:23.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[22:23.000 --> 22:33.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[22:33.000 --> 22:43.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[22:43.000 --> 22:53.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[22:53.000 --> 23:03.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:03.000 --> 23:13.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:13.000 --> 23:23.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:23.000 --> 23:33.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:33.000 --> 23:43.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:43.000 --> 23:51.000]  Logos Radio Network.
[23:51.000 --> 23:57.000]  When I asked that question, he got a look on his face that said,
[23:57.000 --> 24:04.000]  I should know how to answer that question, but I don't.
[24:04.000 --> 24:09.000]  And watching that gave me an idea.
[24:09.000 --> 24:14.000]  These guys need some red flags and green flags.
[24:14.000 --> 24:20.000]  They need something that they can use to evaluate one of these investments.
[24:20.000 --> 24:26.000]  We took the SAC codes and we're breaking them down into questionnaires.
[24:26.000 --> 24:32.000]  So that when a developer goes through the questionnaire,
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  the questionnaire will produce for the developer a checklist.
[24:37.000 --> 24:44.000]  These are all of the criteria you must meet in order to be compliant.
[24:44.000 --> 24:50.000]  For the investor, it will create a compliance report.
[24:50.000 --> 25:02.000]  The investor can go through the output report and be able to establish how this particular offering
[25:02.000 --> 25:08.000]  relates to the controlling securities codes.
[25:08.000 --> 25:16.000]  It gives them something to work with rather than tell these guys what a great product we've developed.
[25:16.000 --> 25:24.000]  We use the tool, we use the product to develop a solution for these guys
[25:24.000 --> 25:30.000]  so that we don't have to tell them what a great product we have, we can demonstrate it to them.
[25:30.000 --> 25:37.000]  Solve the serious problems they have so that when we get to the private sale,
[25:37.000 --> 25:44.000]  we won't have to convince the investors that this is a good investment.
[25:44.000 --> 25:50.000]  We're hoping that we'll set out a target investment amount.
[25:50.000 --> 25:58.000]  We're hoping that they're willing to pay more for our tokens than we're asking
[25:58.000 --> 26:03.000]  in order to be able to purchase the tokens and we're hoping to get more than we're asking for.
[26:03.000 --> 26:11.000]  We're relatively certain that we will be able to meet our investment, our goal
[26:11.000 --> 26:15.000]  because of this tool that will be available to everybody.
[26:15.000 --> 26:22.000]  That's basically where we're at. We're right at the point of seeking the angel funding
[26:22.000 --> 26:25.000]  once we get that and we're rocking and rolling.
[26:25.000 --> 26:32.000]  It looks like Deb has the phone lines up because we're beginning to build up some calls.
[26:32.000 --> 26:36.000]  Let's start with Ken in New York. Hello, Ken.
[26:36.000 --> 26:39.000]  Hi, Randy. How are you doing?
[26:39.000 --> 26:41.000]  I'm doing good.
[26:41.000 --> 26:46.000]  Sounds like it. Were you talking about the SEC or the F-E-C?
[26:46.000 --> 26:50.000]  SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission.
[26:50.000 --> 26:55.000]  Sorry. It was no help.
[26:55.000 --> 27:00.000]  You're just picking on me because I got new teeth and my asses sound like AFs.
[27:00.000 --> 27:02.000]  I'm still adjusting.
[27:02.000 --> 27:07.000]  I didn't want to say anything about it, but it actually sounds like your accent's a little different.
[27:07.000 --> 27:17.000]  You know you're getting old when you sneeze and you can't catch your teeth before they hit the ground.
[27:17.000 --> 27:28.000]  I'm getting old. I had to go to Mexico and had a new plate fitted and still getting used to it.
[27:28.000 --> 27:33.000]  If I sound a little funny, it's not because I'm drunk or gay or anything like that.
[27:33.000 --> 27:40.000]  I'm just having a little trouble just enunciating clearly. It takes a while to get used to it.
[27:40.000 --> 27:43.000]  What do you have for us, Ken?
[27:43.000 --> 27:53.000]  Somebody was talking about statues not being clear last night or being vague.
[27:53.000 --> 28:02.000]  Yes, we have a lot of problems with that. Especially when I'm working with the SEC codes right now.
[28:02.000 --> 28:06.000]  They're a horrible mess.
[28:06.000 --> 28:11.000]  The Securities and Exchange Commission.
[28:11.000 --> 28:22.000]  Securities. The definition for securities has contained, it says a security can be this, this, this.
[28:22.000 --> 28:26.000]  It starts out with a security.
[28:26.000 --> 28:30.000]  I'm sorry, it starts out with a stock.
[28:30.000 --> 28:40.000]  Well, I can guess at what a stock is, but I don't think a stock when they reference it is the center shank on an anchor,
[28:40.000 --> 28:57.000]  or a fence post, or what do you keep in your factory when you need more stock, what you put on your shelves.
[28:57.000 --> 29:02.000]  I'm sure they've got a meeting for stock, but they didn't say what it was.
[29:02.000 --> 29:17.000]  They've got a number of other things that a security can be, four of which are not defined anywhere on planet Earth.
[29:17.000 --> 29:26.000]  First, both basic, primary definition, and it does make sense.
[29:26.000 --> 29:37.000]  Well, you know what I found? In my limited experience, what I found out in the case of, let's take the Department of Health, for example,
[29:37.000 --> 29:43.000]  the legislature makes a law, you read the law, but it seems like it's lacking something.
[29:43.000 --> 29:50.000]  It doesn't tell you exactly how to make use of it, or it just seems vague.
[29:50.000 --> 30:03.000]  It seems like there's something missing from it, and then by accident, I find a PDF file, and the PDF file is the agency's interpreter.
[30:03.000 --> 30:10.000]  Do you rise with the roosters or hoot with the owls? Either way, it's your brain that determines what time of day you're at your best.
[30:10.000 --> 30:17.000]  Like Dr. Kaepernal Brackton, I'll be back with new research on how the clock affects brain function next.
[30:17.000 --> 30:23.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:23.000 --> 30:28.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:28.000 --> 30:33.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:43.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:43.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:51.000]  Are you a morning person or a night owl? Researchers say our brains determine the answer.
[30:51.000 --> 30:57.000]  They scan volunteers for muscle strength and the excitability of pathways through their nervous systems.
[30:57.000 --> 31:03.000]  They found the brains of early risers worked best at 9 a.m. while the night owls peaked at 9 p.m.
[31:03.000 --> 31:08.000]  Late sleepers also grew stronger throughout the day while morning folks stayed steady.
[31:08.000 --> 31:11.000]  So early birds go easy on those night owls.
[31:11.000 --> 31:15.000]  Sleeping in is more a function of biology than willpower.
[31:15.000 --> 31:22.000]  And once they clear the sleep from their eyes, night owls grow stronger with each passing moment, so they're on a continual upswing.
[31:22.000 --> 31:49.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:52.000 --> 32:03.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at thisusa.org.
[32:03.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:13.000]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:20.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:36.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie.
[32:46.000 --> 32:51.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:00.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:04.000 --> 33:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:11.000 --> 33:25.000]  Yeah, I got that one rent, and I'm going to solve them, to the government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.000 --> 33:27.000]  Okay.
[33:27.000 --> 33:44.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelsen, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Ken in New York.
[33:44.000 --> 33:52.000]  Ken, you just ran right off the cliff, and if Deborah was here, she would blame me for it.
[33:52.000 --> 33:58.000]  I'm making the point about your voice changing.
[33:58.000 --> 34:04.000]  When you announced during the break, it was quite a bit different than it is now.
[34:04.000 --> 34:06.000]  I'm not criticizing or anything.
[34:06.000 --> 34:08.000]  I'm working on it.
[34:08.000 --> 34:17.000]  Okay, so I realize it might not be the same thing with the SEC because they're an agency to begin with, so I don't know whether they're...
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  I doubt that these guys just seem to run on their own authority, but...
[34:22.000 --> 34:38.000]  It is the same. It is the place of the enforcement agency to define what the code means.
[34:38.000 --> 34:47.000]  When the code is obtuse or unclear, it's the place of the agency to clarify the code.
[34:47.000 --> 34:52.000]  But the SEC seems to have made no effort to clarify the code.
[34:52.000 --> 35:06.000]  In fact, their CFRs, their Code of Federal Regulation, is as convoluted, if not more so, than the statutes themselves.
[35:06.000 --> 35:11.000]  Maybe that's why so many lawyers make money doing that stuff.
[35:11.000 --> 35:26.000]  Lawyers are charging people an unreasonable amount to declare whether or not their particular offering is in compliance.
[35:26.000 --> 35:32.000]  And for the most part, the lawyers do not have a clue.
[35:32.000 --> 35:38.000]  That's why the space is in such a mess. That's why Monty got shut down.
[35:38.000 --> 35:44.000]  They hired some chump lawyer, and the lawyer said, oh yeah, that's fun.
[35:44.000 --> 35:54.000]  And they had the single most glaring red flag on their site that you absolutely cannot have.
[35:54.000 --> 36:02.000]  If you're selling a security, then you fall under one set of code.
[36:02.000 --> 36:08.000]  If you're selling a token, you fall under a different set of code.
[36:08.000 --> 36:10.000]  And here's the difference.
[36:10.000 --> 36:22.000]  If a person purchases your offering, and they are given no reason to believe
[36:22.000 --> 36:33.000]  that the offering will increase in value simply because you hold it, then it is not a security.
[36:33.000 --> 36:41.000]  If I sell you a pound of lead, a pound of lead is a pound of lead.
[36:41.000 --> 36:53.000]  You don't necessarily expect that pound of lead to increase in value other than normal increase in the normal course of business.
[36:53.000 --> 37:08.000]  But if I sell you an investment and you hold that investment and you expect that because of the efforts of the company
[37:08.000 --> 37:12.000]  that that investment will increase in value, that is a security.
[37:12.000 --> 37:19.000]  Now the Securities and Charities Commission has a definition for security that no human being can make sense of.
[37:19.000 --> 37:24.000]  By definition, it doesn't make sense.
[37:24.000 --> 37:32.000]  You can't define something by saying it can be a certain thing, and that certain thing is not defined anywhere on Earth.
[37:32.000 --> 37:38.000]  Then you don't know if it's that certain thing or not, that certain thing can be anything on the planet.
[37:38.000 --> 37:41.000]  Now they do have a definition.
[37:41.000 --> 37:47.000]  They use it when they do enforcement actions.
[37:47.000 --> 37:54.000]  And that definition is out of the holy case.
[37:54.000 --> 38:10.000]  And what it says is if there's a common enterprise, and a common enterprise is where you allow members of the public or other people other than yourself to participate in the enterprise,
[38:10.000 --> 38:34.000]  and you sell something to people engaging in this common enterprise, that the people purchasing it have an expectation that it will increase in value through no effort of themselves.
[38:34.000 --> 38:36.000]  Then it's a security.
[38:36.000 --> 38:43.000]  And that's a definition that's understandable.
[38:43.000 --> 38:46.000]  A human being can make sense of that.
[38:46.000 --> 38:54.000]  So basically you have to, the clarification comes from somebody duking it out in court and then the case law rules.
[38:54.000 --> 38:56.000]  Exactly.
[38:56.000 --> 39:00.000]  So why isn't that in code?
[39:00.000 --> 39:03.000]  Guys, this is not rocket science.
[39:03.000 --> 39:12.000]  So what I'm going to do is I'm going to send a information request to the director of the exchange commission,
[39:12.000 --> 39:27.000]  asking for a citable definition of securities that meet the requirements of the Statutory Construction Act.
[39:27.000 --> 39:37.000]  And when I don't get one, which I'm sure I won't because I contacted the Securities Exchange Commission in 4th to have an office there,
[39:37.000 --> 39:42.000]  and asked them for a definition of securities.
[39:42.000 --> 39:50.000]  I received an email that said I should go to investopedia.
[39:50.000 --> 39:56.000]  I sent him an email back, are you kidding me?
[39:56.000 --> 40:09.000]  Did you really direct me to a commercial website for a definition of a primary term used by this commission?
[40:09.000 --> 40:16.000]  Give me the commission's definition.
[40:16.000 --> 40:20.000]  And they referred me.
[40:20.000 --> 40:23.000]  Yeah, the definition is really simple.
[40:23.000 --> 40:29.000]  So why didn't they just send that to you?
[40:29.000 --> 40:32.000]  Wait, I'm losing you there, kid.
[40:32.000 --> 40:34.000]  I'm sorry, do you have me now?
[40:34.000 --> 40:37.000]  Yeah, now I can hear you.
[40:37.000 --> 40:45.000]  I mean, this definition that I quoted, they've used it in a number of cases.
[40:45.000 --> 40:49.000]  Why didn't they send that to me?
[40:49.000 --> 40:52.000]  What's going on here?
[40:52.000 --> 40:59.000]  So I'm going to request it, and when I don't get it, then I'm going to petition the federal court.
[40:59.000 --> 41:14.000]  I'm going to file a petition for declaratory judgment and ask the court to give me a citable definition of the term security.
[41:14.000 --> 41:27.000]  This is not hard. If the Spiritist Exchange Commission can't give me a definition that I can cite in court, then we'll see federal judge can't do that for us.
[41:27.000 --> 41:43.000]  And every time I come across these terms that I find in code, while I'm talking, I'm going to try to bring one up here, that is a real good example of some of the problems in the code.
[41:43.000 --> 41:52.000]  It's just kind of nuts the way they use language here.
[41:52.000 --> 41:59.000]  It is the idea of code that ordinary people be able to read and understand it.
[41:59.000 --> 42:10.000]  So what I'm getting are these terms that nobody can make sense of, let's see if I've got it here.
[42:10.000 --> 42:18.000]  I always thought of code as being something that was meant to be secret.
[42:18.000 --> 42:29.000]  Well, I think they got that idea too. Here, okay, this is 230.500 paragraph B.
[42:29.000 --> 42:41.000]  Nothing in regulation D obviates the D to comply with any applicable state law relating to the offer and sale of securities.
[42:41.000 --> 42:52.000]  What in the heck does that mean? What does obviates mean?
[42:52.000 --> 42:54.000]  They copy it.
[42:54.000 --> 43:07.000]  It's an English term and it has a definition, but even when you look it up, it is unclear what is meant by obviates.
[43:07.000 --> 43:09.000]  Is there a chief counsel in this agency?
[43:09.000 --> 43:19.000]  If I take obviates out and I put in implicates, didn't it make sense?
[43:19.000 --> 43:33.000]  And that's actually where they're going. So I'm going to ask the SEC to explain what that means and why the SEC in their CFRs is a code of federal regulation.
[43:33.000 --> 43:49.000]  If you are in court and you are addressing an issue that is regulated by a government agency who has produced a code of federal regulation.
[43:49.000 --> 44:00.000]  The code of federal regulation stands before the statute because the Supreme has said...
[44:00.000 --> 44:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.000 --> 44:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.000 --> 44:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal stealers and journalists.
[44:24.000 --> 44:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.000 --> 44:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[44:32.000 --> 44:39.000]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.000 --> 44:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:46.000 --> 44:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.000 --> 44:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.000 --> 45:00.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:00.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.000 --> 46:23.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:23.000 --> 46:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelsen, rule of law radio, and that can ran off to cliff again while I wasn't looking.
[46:36.000 --> 46:42.000]  I didn't do that that time.
[46:42.000 --> 46:44.000]  Okay, this is obvious.
[46:44.000 --> 46:53.000]  When you read the code, there should be no room for interpretation.
[46:53.000 --> 47:15.000]  If two people, two reasonable people of ordinary prudence, can read the code and come to different opinions as to what it means, then the code does not meet statutory construction requirements.
[47:15.000 --> 47:24.000]  It is the nature of SEC to not meet statutory construction requirements.
[47:24.000 --> 47:35.000]  And one of the things that we will be doing is, as we build these questionnaires, and we have a special interest in it.
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  We're building this questionnaire as a marketing tool.
[47:40.000 --> 47:56.000]  So when we develop the questionnaire so that we can convert the statute into questions, we really need to know what, be able to understand what that statute means.
[47:56.000 --> 48:01.000]  So that gives us a standing to raise the issue.
[48:01.000 --> 48:09.000]  When we start dragging the director of the SEC into the federal court repeatedly,
[48:09.000 --> 48:26.000]  I think we'll be able to get the SEC to start defining these terms and put them in CFRs because the agency writes the CFR is not the legislature.
[48:26.000 --> 48:28.000]  They could have fixed this.
[48:28.000 --> 48:39.000]  And the legislature has been testizing the SEC for defining policy with enforcement.
[48:39.000 --> 48:44.000]  Same problem they're having with the IRS.
[48:44.000 --> 48:55.000]  The IRS defines policy with enforcement, and this allows the IRS and the SEC to simply go in and say,
[48:55.000 --> 48:58.000]  we don't like the way you're doing this.
[48:58.000 --> 49:04.000]  I know you read the code and you think that you're in compliance with the code,
[49:04.000 --> 49:10.000]  but we decided that we don't like the way you're doing it, and we're going to adopt policy.
[49:10.000 --> 49:15.000]  And our policy says you're not doing it the way we want you to do it,
[49:15.000 --> 49:22.000]  so you're going to have to do it this other way and pay us a $300,000 fine.
[49:22.000 --> 49:28.000]  They're padding their budget with fines.
[49:28.000 --> 49:31.000]  That's why they're not defining these.
[49:31.000 --> 49:33.000]  They're planning their retirement.
[49:33.000 --> 49:36.000]  They don't have time to actually do what they're supposed to be doing.
[49:36.000 --> 49:41.000]  Maybe you should get a hold of the chief counsel and bar grieve from me.
[49:41.000 --> 49:44.000]  What is it with that guy?
[49:44.000 --> 49:48.000]  Oh, I will bar grieve them into the Stone Age.
[49:48.000 --> 49:55.000]  The reason is, I don't have a bar card that can jerk.
[49:55.000 --> 49:58.000]  And the federal judges are already going to know who I am,
[49:58.000 --> 50:04.000]  because I'm the one that filed a petition for declaratory judgment in Fort Worth,
[50:04.000 --> 50:14.000]  and Judge McBride got it, and I affectionately called him a stinker.
[50:14.000 --> 50:26.000]  And he was practicing, had a practice of dismissing any prose filing with prejudice.
[50:26.000 --> 50:32.000]  So I filed a petition for declaratory judgment.
[50:32.000 --> 50:44.000]  Lawyer for Locklord filed a response, a 12b6 response to a petition for declaratory judgment.
[50:44.000 --> 50:47.000]  He said there was no claim.
[50:47.000 --> 50:50.000]  Naughty, naughty.
[50:50.000 --> 50:53.000]  The lawyer really didn't understand what it was.
[50:53.000 --> 51:04.000]  A 12b6, that's a new catch all that the lawyers get to use to get any prose filing thrown out.
[51:04.000 --> 51:12.000]  12b6 is an allegation of a failure to state a claim on which recovery can be had.
[51:12.000 --> 51:18.000]  Well, a petition for declaratory judgment doesn't have a claim.
[51:18.000 --> 51:25.000]  It's merely a request that the court declare the rights of the parties.
[51:25.000 --> 51:27.000]  It has no claims.
[51:27.000 --> 51:36.000]  Well, they filed a 12b6, and the judge dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
[51:36.000 --> 51:41.000]  I filed criminal charges against him with the SAC in Dallas,
[51:41.000 --> 51:45.000]  and Special Agent charged the FBI in Dallas.
[51:45.000 --> 51:53.000]  How long has he been a judge?
[51:53.000 --> 51:56.000]  Oh, he's in his 90s.
[51:56.000 --> 52:02.000]  He's been a judge for some 50 years.
[52:02.000 --> 52:08.000]  On the one hand, he seems very opinionated and cantankerous.
[52:08.000 --> 52:11.000]  That's why I call him a stinker.
[52:11.000 --> 52:22.000]  But then on the other, he has written some very well-structured rulings and orders.
[52:22.000 --> 52:29.000]  So he's no chump, he's just a jerk.
[52:29.000 --> 52:32.000]  I guess you could be a jerk without being a chump.
[52:32.000 --> 52:40.000]  He just seems to hate process, and I want to give him more reason to hate process.
[52:40.000 --> 52:45.000]  Sometimes he loses his moments, and other times he doesn't.
[52:45.000 --> 52:50.000]  Well, I'm not crazy about Judge McBride.
[52:50.000 --> 53:04.000]  He's an old guy, but I have no evidence to indicate that he's in any way disabled.
[53:04.000 --> 53:09.000]  So if I could make that claim against him, I would, but have no way to do it.
[53:09.000 --> 53:14.000]  I think that some of his rulings and some of them are really pretty good.
[53:14.000 --> 53:17.000]  And he's difficult.
[53:17.000 --> 53:23.000]  But I don't always mind someone who's difficult as long as they're consistent.
[53:23.000 --> 53:31.000]  He's consistently against pro se litigants, but that's not such a problem if I know what he's going to do.
[53:31.000 --> 53:36.000]  Because frankly, I set him up so I could file charges against him.
[53:36.000 --> 53:41.000]  He dismissed that case the same day I non suited it.
[53:41.000 --> 53:51.000]  I non suited it because the lawyer said that the judge should dismiss the case because Wells Fargo was not the lender.
[53:51.000 --> 53:55.000]  Well, maybe they weren't, but they were the agent for the lender.
[53:55.000 --> 54:01.000]  So they stand in the shoes of the lender, and I don't think the lawyer understood that.
[54:01.000 --> 54:08.000]  He said that Wells Fargo wasn't the lender. He means that they're the servicer.
[54:08.000 --> 54:14.000]  But they stand in the shoes of the lender so they can be sued just like the lender can.
[54:14.000 --> 54:17.000]  Well, you made a big mistake.
[54:17.000 --> 54:25.000]  If you make a statement in court of a particular position,
[54:25.000 --> 54:32.000]  then you can never make a contradictory statement in any other court.
[54:32.000 --> 54:37.000]  When they stated that they were not the lender,
[54:37.000 --> 54:44.000]  they can never, in order to keep him from having an opportunity to correct that,
[54:44.000 --> 54:47.000]  I filed a non suit.
[54:47.000 --> 54:50.000]  Oh my goodness, my bad.
[54:50.000 --> 54:56.000]  I sued the wrong guy. I thought he was the agent for the lender, but I guess he's not.
[54:56.000 --> 54:58.000]  So I non suited it.
[54:58.000 --> 55:00.000]  That created collateral stoppage.
[55:00.000 --> 55:09.000]  Now they could never come back into court and say that they are the agent for the lender.
[55:09.000 --> 55:15.000]  That's why I did that, but the same day I did that, he dismissed with prejudice for failure state of claim.
[55:15.000 --> 55:23.000]  So it was perfect to file criminal charges against him because it was clear I didn't care that case was dismissed.
[55:23.000 --> 55:26.000]  I'm just claiming he didn't have power to do it.
[55:26.000 --> 55:31.000]  He exerted, reported to exert an authority he did not expressly have it in the process.
[55:31.000 --> 55:37.000]  Did not mean full free access to enjoyment of right. Take that chump and deal with that.
[55:37.000 --> 55:43.000]  Well, after that some other people filed my declaratory judgment suit.
[55:43.000 --> 55:48.000]  And he did not dismiss a single one of them.
[55:48.000 --> 55:50.000]  We got his attention.
[55:50.000 --> 55:58.000]  Well, so when I start going after the SEC, when something like that happens to one of these judges, everybody finds out about it.
[55:58.000 --> 56:09.000]  So they're going to know that who this Trump pro say is that likes to go after federal judges and knows how.
[56:09.000 --> 56:21.000]  I don't know if I, Randy, I don't know if I was muted before, but I suggested that you just, if you consider the SEC fully the investors, you won't have to go through any of this.
[56:21.000 --> 56:25.000]  Well, no, it's not that. I want to do that.
[56:25.000 --> 56:27.000]  Oh, okay.
[56:27.000 --> 56:35.000]  Yeah, I want to demonstrate to the investors the power of the tools that we're using.
[56:35.000 --> 56:37.000]  Ah, an objective.
[56:37.000 --> 56:40.000]  Yeah, they're afraid of the SEC.
[56:40.000 --> 56:46.000]  All of them are terrified of the SEC and I want to come in and run over the SEC rough shot.
[56:46.000 --> 56:58.000]  I want to stomp all over them, drag them into court, filed complaints against the director, bar grieve their lawyers into the stone age.
[56:58.000 --> 57:06.000]  I want to show them how to defend themselves against these guys and demonstrate that it can be done.
[57:06.000 --> 57:20.000]  So when I go for investment for funding, these people in the space are going to say, these are the guys that took on the SEC.
[57:20.000 --> 57:27.000]  These are the guys that are forcing the SEC to clarify their position.
[57:27.000 --> 57:31.000]  So we're going to be well known in the space.
[57:31.000 --> 57:43.000]  We're going to be the ones to have fixed this problem and we will eliminate the concern about the SEC because here are all the requirements.
[57:43.000 --> 58:00.000]  First, we go through all the codes and once we have the codes broken down into questionnaires, then we go, we take all of the reasons someone has been cited or prosecuted by the SEC.
[58:00.000 --> 58:13.000]  We go in, look at the area that they were charged, where they were charged and we show them how to make adjustments to avoid that.
[58:13.000 --> 58:26.000]  So if the SEC comes back and charges them for the same thing when they've made the correction and they have a different argument, then we hammer them, drag them into court, force them to be consistent.
[58:26.000 --> 58:35.000]  Hang on, about to go to break. Randy Kelsen, Wheel of Law Radio, our calling number 512-646-1984.
[58:35.000 --> 58:42.000]  Ted, John, I see you both there. We will get to everybody. We have one empty space on our call board.
[58:42.000 --> 58:50.000]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 59:01.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:27.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:50.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:58.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  To follow in these flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  Markets for Wednesday 14 November 2018 open with precious metals at $1,203.05, silver $14.05, copper $2.69, platinum $840.05, palladium $1,136.20, and rhodium $2,515 an ounce.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  Oil, Texas Crude's $55.69, and Brian Crude is at $65.47 a barrel, and cryptos, Bitcoins at $6,244.16, Ethereum $194.90, XRP $48, Bitcoin Cash $473.16, XLM $24, EOS $4.93, and Litecoins at $48.21 a crypto coin.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  Today in History, the year 1922, the British Broadcasting Company, or BBC, begins radio transmissions in the United Kingdom.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  Today in History.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  In recent news, Houston set a new record for first snowfall, breaking one set on November 23rd, 1979, beating places like New York City and Boston to give you some perspective, a consequence of a near record breaking cold front in the south with temperatures in the state plummeting 25 degrees or more below the yearly average.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Freeze warnings are in effect for a large part of the state, including stretching into New Mexico, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Temperatures are expected to chill in the high 30s with forecast by the National Weather Services showing temperatures below freezing late Tuesday and Wednesday.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:02:00.000]  After months of delays and setbacks, Brexit negotiators for Britain and the European Union have fondly drafted an agreement on how the country will exit the Political and Economic Union of Europe. The document is set to be reviewed by an emergency cabinet meeting called by Prime Minister Theresa May for a Wednesday afternoon.
[01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  If the cabinet ends up endorsing Theresa May's proposal, the following agenda would be a Brexit summit attended by leaders of the European Union's remaining 27 member states and Brussels later this month. If approved by European leaders, the treaty would then go to the British Parliament where it faces obstacles concerning Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and the certain battle between hard Brexit tears and the soft ones.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, speaking on the potentiality of cryptocurrencies being used by governments at a FinTech conference in Singapore, said that the advantage is clear. Your payment would be immediate, safe, and cheap and potentially semi-anonymous, and central banks would retain a sure footing in payment.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  In addition, they would offer a more level playing field for competition and a platform for innovation. Meanwhile, your bank or fellow entrepreneurs would have ensured a friendly user experience based on the latest technologies.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:59.000]  This was work rotting with your lowdown for November 14, 2018.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with our radio and we're talking to Ken in New York. Okay, Ken.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  I'm all done.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Okay, we're looking at being able to. It's a unique position. We've got everybody afraid of the SEC. We have people trying to comply with the SEC and they're unable to.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  So we have a lot of people just trying to ignore the SEC or get around them.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  So we have an opportunity to go in and essentially stabilize the space.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  We can get the SEC under control by developing the questionnaires. We ask them questions like we have the SEC shut one company down because they didn't.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  The bio biographical information on their officers was insufficient. They shut their company down for that nonsense.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  We'll put an end to that stuff because we will require stipulation of what amount of information is needed.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  When they shut these people down, they will explain what they claim was missing.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  So once they've done that, they have established their position.
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  And we'll ask questions to ensure that they meet this set of requirements. If the SEC comes back with a different set of requirements, then we go directly after the SEC.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  We go after the director, go after the regulator, go after them in the federal court and sue them for official oppression.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  You guys can't get your act straight. We'll see if we can't straighten it out for you.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  Would you promise one thing before you do that? Don't let it end up like East Texas. I don't want to see it end up in supermax.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  I've been doing this for 20 years. I've been going straight for these guys.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  But I don't like to go after really major issues. If you listen to the show a lot, you'll see that sometimes I get people on the show that I tell them to get off the air quickly.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  Call me off the air. Do not do this on the air. Too dangerous.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  What a wind-up in supermax. You won't fix the system by going after the horrible stuff that they do.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  You'll fix the system by picking them apart on minor details.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  That's where we're going after your minor detail.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  You don't want to shoot your mouth off the whole world about what you're planning.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  No, this is okay. We're planning on holding the SEC to their own rules.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  We're not accusing the SEC of a huge conspiracy. There's not some major calamities.
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  They're not trying to collapse the investment community. They're not trying to destroy the government.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  They're not trying to wipe out half the population. They just declared themselves to hold a position.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  We expect them to hold to that position. You change that position and you try to find someone because you decided to change the position.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  We come after you directly.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  Now, you go to the federal grand jury and explain yourself. In this prosecution of someone, you explained what they had to do.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  We make sure everybody's doing that. You go after somebody else for that, then we take you to the grand jury and explain it.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  The way to fix it is not going after the big stuff, but take them apart on the minor details.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  So when the boss tells them, well, we're not collecting enough fines here, I need you to do some more enforcement.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  If you tell the boss, you go do that enforcement. I try that stuff. This guy's coming after me. Don't put me in front of a grand jury.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  So if you want to go out there and take the lead, take the point, then I'll follow you. But don't ask me to do it. This is how we fix it.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  We're doing this with tickets in Texas.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  The policeman writes a ticket. Somebody goes to my website and if the policeman is not a DPS officer, the vast majority of the tickets are not written by DPS officers.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  They're written by local police.
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  If he's not a DPS officer, first thing we do is file a professional conduct complaint against him.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  He's one of those and he can't be insured.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  His bonding company, the agency's bonding agent will come to the agency and say, hey, you got this cop over here.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  He's got six professional conduct complaints. He is an unacceptable risk.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  If you keep this guy, we're going to raise the bond rating for your whole department.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  So what's going to happen to this guy? He is going right under the bus and he not only does he get fired, no one else will hire him.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  He becomes unemployable and they know that.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  So the cop goes out and does what the boss told him and bang, he gets a professional conduct complaint.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  The boss wants to send him out to write another ticket.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  You're going to write that ticket. Six of those, my career is over.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  This is how we get them.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  We use their own politics against them.
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  Not major, minor stuff.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  The major stuff is where they put you in supermanics.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  But taking them apart on the tiny details, they can't put everybody in supermanics who objects to a minor error on their part or a minor enforcement fraction on their part.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  But if we make it so that the objection is automatic so that the individual doesn't have to know anything about the code,
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  he just goes through the questionnaire and the questionnaire will spit out the objection.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  It will spit out the professional conduct complaint and in some cases it will spit out a criminal complaint.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  If the guy is a lawyer, it will spit out a bar grievance.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Just pound him and the system will pound him automatically.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  This is how we're going to fix it.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  I'm not too concerned about supermanics, especially since I won't be doing it.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  I'll be getting these other people to do it.
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  The computer that's doing it will not be in the United States.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  Do you there, Ken?
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  I use an email service that's in Australia.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  I have sites in the Isle of Man, where is Iceland.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  I'm looking at British Virgin Islands to set the company up in.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Some place that's out of reach of US Long Arm.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  Long Arm can't get to me if it's a computer in another country.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  I'm using the I.O. for the Indian Ocean that I.O. goes to.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  The United States can't redirect that URL.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  The same thing with Iceland.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  That's the primary reason for getting one in Iceland, so the US can't mess with it.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  But I don't think they will anyway.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  Because at the end of the day, this will simply stabilize the space.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  The DSCC is not going to like having to change their practices and procedures.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  But at the end of the day, everybody will benefit.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  They'll get the legislature off their case.
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  They may not have as much fine funds to play with, but they can learn to live within their budget.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  One of the things we definitely want to look at is making sure that if an agency issues a fine,
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  or is granted a fine, that the fine goes to the general fund and not to the agency.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  So it's not to the agency's benefit to produce fines.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  The IRS is a separate company, so they're a different situation.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  They need to be set up so that any fine the IRS issues goes to the United States General Fund and not to the IRS corporation.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  But that's a different issue.
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  It was a long ride, but thanks.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  I kind of hijacked you and talked about my stuff.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  I only had a simple question.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  I'll call back next week if anybody's ever had any success against police quarters.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  Like on the 1st and the 15th of the month, you see them hanging underneath bridges and they're doing a harvesting thing.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  Wait, against police what?
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  We have a system here called a quota, which they smile at you and deny when you...
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  You know what I'm talking about?
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  They claim they don't have quotas.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  Of course they do.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  Of course they smile at you while you're doing it.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  That's what the ticket sign is for.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  I don't have it fleshed out for New York and all the other states.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  I do have it fleshed out for Texas.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  I haven't actively promoted it, but a few people have used it, probably 20 or 30.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  And we just had someone on the show last night that said he filed my documents and then went to court.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  The prosecutor told him that it was illegal to file sovereign citizen documents.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  They've already got them named.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  You know where that came from?
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  That's an invention of Homeland Security.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  And it makes no sense at all because the two terms would be mutually exclusive, wouldn't they?
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  How could you be a sovereign and yet be a citizen of something?
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  I had a captain on the Wheatley County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department ask me if I was a sovereign citizen.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  I said, you know that's a contradiction of terms.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  So tell me, are you a Jack booted thug?
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  Sure.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  Anytime I'm asked if I'm a sovereign citizen, I always ask them if they're a Jack booted thug.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  That is one of the most aggravating things that I've ever heard of a sovereign citizen.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  They used to call us patriots and now they call us sovereign citizens.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  They're always going to make up terms to try to poison our wealth, but it's the way it works.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  Okay, thank you Ken.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  About to go to break.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Ted, John, I'll see you there.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  We'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  Randy Kelton, Wheatley Law Radio.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:59.000]  I'll call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  That's the 2018 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get 4 chances to win.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:20.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a bloodite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  No.
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  No.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  No.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  We are Logos.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  Good evening, Randy.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  Well, this is a continuation of our call from, I believe, last Thursday where I was, we were
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  in the middle of where we're going to go with the complaint against the judge that had me
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  demanded my appearance in the courtroom against doctors' orders under threat of arrest.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  I appeared, started to have a heart attack, but prior to the onset of the heart attack,
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  we did start the hearing.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:36.000]  The judge took a recess to go check the law in her office, and while she was in her office,
[01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  I'd been increasingly ill, and I told the deputy, I need to go to the doctor now, and
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  the deputy went and told the judge.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  The judge said, he's not going, you know, he can't go anywhere, and the deputy came back
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  and sat back down at his desk, looked at me, observed me a while, time went by.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  The deputy says, do you want me to call 911?
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  I said yes.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  He called 911, and then he ran back and told the judge, but he called 911, and the judge
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  came out, took the bench and continued, went back on the record and continued to prosecute
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  me while the paramedics and ambulance were on the way.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  So for that, I'm writing a criminal complaint, or it's written, it's done.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  I've repeatedly asked for the transcript from the court reporter that was there that day,
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  and it's always been ignored.
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  I called that court reporter every day this week.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  She finally responded to me today, because we're trying to get the court reporter's transcript
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  as an exhibit within this criminal complaint.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  So it looks like that's finally going to happen.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  I expect it to be scrubbed, and for those that don't know, court reporters really, it's becoming
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  more clear to me that they clean up the language, and they're not reporting the word that are
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  coming out of the judge's mouth, or for that matter, anybody's mouth.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  And I'm going to segue just for a second.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  I think the fastest, quickest way to clean up our court system across this country is
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  for the people to demand that there is video and audio recording of every court appearance
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  every time the court is open for business.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  This, you know, would, I believe in my experience, really start to change things,
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  because we're out of impasse now where court reporters can just change what's going on.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  For example, in my case, my arraignment, I did not waste time, but in the transcript.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  Okay, let me explain. I said, I see the public defender nodding his head.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  The court and the court reporter took that to mean that I said yes, that I waste time.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  However, and again, I've segueed off for a second, but it's very important for people to know.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  Why would court reporters not put down exact word?
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Okay, some of it could be because people talk over each other.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  Some of it's a mistake, but a lot of it's not.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  But, you know, I've read that transcript now several times,
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  and what the judge asked me if I waved time to was did I waved time to a preliminary hearing within 60 days?
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  That's what he asked me, and in fact, the court reporter put that down twice.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  So, I never waved time to a speed trial, and we are waved half the time for that.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  But back to the situation of this hearing, it was on June 1st of 2016.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  Again, doctors' order and doctors' prescription, the doctors' letter said that I was subject to sudden death,
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  that I could have no stress. I had a heart attack five weeks earlier.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  And the judge said, that's vague. You tell him to get down here, I'm issuing a bench warrant.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  So, I appear, and like I said, she started the hearing, she left the bench to check some law,
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  and I started to have a second heart attack.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  Marimatics are on the way, she comes in, goes back on the bench, fully aware of all this, continues to prosecute me.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  And as you said in our last call, that that was a depraved heart or depraved indifference.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  I've written that in the criminal complaint.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  But I'm stuck, and Randy, I got one other big thing to bring up tonight on the quote warrant, though.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  I'm a little stuck here as to, because you know, I've already presented mailed by registered mail
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  about six criminal complaints to the district attorney's office.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  They've said nothing about a couple of them that were against their deputy DAs,
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  but they sent a couple other ones back to me.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  They, in a letter, admitted, they opened the mail, admitted they opened registered mail that was addressed
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  to the foreman of the criminal grand jury, and they sent them back to me.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  And so, for that, I wrote a criminal complaint against the assistant DA that did that
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  and also named the district attorney because I'm not his agent.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  And I believe that the district attorney instructed his assistant DA to do that.
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:12.000]  And so, I wrote a criminal complaint on that.
[01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I mailed it to the foreman of the criminal grand jury.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  And to, you know, the criminal grand jury's address is the DA's office.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  And so, and as always, so you don't get to tell me, I get to beat my, take the phone and beat myself up the head.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  Yes, absolutely.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  I always enclose a self-addressed stamped envelope with a letter informing the grand jury foreman
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  that I've enclosed a self-addressed stamped envelope and a note for him to put his mark on
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  confirming he received my complaint.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  So, with that background, like I said, I went ahead and I filed a criminal complaint or
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  wrote the criminal complaint against the DA and the assistant DA for secreting my complaint
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  to the criminal grand jury and mail tampering and mail fraud and about six other counts.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  Now, I have not heard a word about that.
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  I sent that again by registered mail and for address the only and confidential, you know,
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  it was all written all over it.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:36.000]  And I put insurance on it, Randy.
[01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  Good.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  So, now, since I do see by looking at online at the U.S. Post Office's record that it was handled,
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  it did get to them.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  We got another issue here where they use a stamp or don't sign at all.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  And we've now taken that to Washington, D.C., United States Post Office.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  The guy's name, he's in charge of everything.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  And I think they're going to be coming down here educating our mail carriers about how
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  to properly handle registered mail.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  And I will file a claim for the insurance because I did not get back the confirmation that the
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  criminal grand jury foreman received my criminal complaint against the DA and the assistant DA.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  And so, now, with all those out there, I'm now making this, it's written, it's ready to go against the judge
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  for the depraved indifference aggravated assault and, you know, a litany of other charges.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  And I'm stumped exactly where I believe I should go to, who I should go to with that.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  But I also want to remind you, I have that core warrant, so, up at the Attorney General.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  And I'll talk about that next.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  But with that also being in play, and the fact that, and by the way, yes, absolutely,
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  I bar grieve these liars, I mean, lawyers every time this happens.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  So, I've got about six bar grievances, you know, bar complaints that are active right now.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  I've received a card back from the California Bar and they've assigned case numbers to each of them.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  I also, it's really interesting that when you send mail to the...
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Wait, wait, hold on, hold on, about to go to break, we'll be right back.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Imagine you're coming home from work when you see someone lugging a huge TV down the sidewalk.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  Would you pity the guy and help out or would you drive on past?
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  One Delaware Good Samaritan did the right thing when he lent a hand to a stranger struggling to carry a flat screen TV.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  Then he noticed this.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  The door of his house was ajar and the television was his.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Picture the scene.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:11.000]  Thief and victim lock stairs.
[01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  Thief dumps the TV in bolts.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Victim chases thief dialing 911 on his cell phone.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  Police respond quickly and nab the thief and his getaway driver.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  The moral to the story? Lend a hand. Some good might come of it.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:33.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:05.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:10.000]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  Randy Kelton.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  We'll have our radio on this Friday, the 16th day of November, 2018.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  And we're talking to Ted in California.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Okay, Ted, go ahead.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  I was too deep in what you were doing and I wasn't watching the clock.
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  You found it good enough and I think we're still not in trouble just yet.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  So with all that said, Randy, I'm a little stumped at where I send this criminal complaint on this judge.
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  Besides to the jury grand-form and who else should I send it to?
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  I'm thinking.
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  I'm trying to think of how we bring that to a federal violation.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  It's directly state.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  So it might be time to charge the district attorney with denying due process by secreting your complaints from the grand jury.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  File that with the SAC for the FBI.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  But I don't think we can get directly to the judge in the Fed. We can get directly to her in the state but not the Fed yet.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Yeah, although she violated my first, fourth, fifth, eighth amendment right, I'm stumped on that as well.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  I believe I should... Okay, hold on. First, fourth, and fifth amendment, how do you get to those?
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  What I'm asking, what I'm looking for, are those violations that were committed in conjunction with this depraved indifference?
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Yes.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Then take them straight to the Fed. Take the depraved indifference with it.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  Now, when you say take it to the Fed...
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  Special agent in charge of the FBI for that, whatever district that court has in.
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Okay, now, what about the Department of Justice?
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  First, you want to go to the SAC.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  And then, when you get no response from the SAC, you file against the SAC with U.S. attorney.
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  And the U.S. attorney is required to give notice to the attorney general in D.C. and that'll bring you to D.C.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  Okay, when you say U.S. attorney, you're talking about the U.S. attorney that's over this district?
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  Yes.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  Okay. And remember, I did already send one of my criminal complaints to the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in San Francisco.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  Have you heard a response from him?
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  No.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  How long has it been?
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  Going on four weeks.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  Then file against him with the U.S. attorney.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  Accused him of shielding the accused from prosecution and official oppression in 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  File that with the U.S. attorney.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  And then file all these complaints against the judge.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  And the others, file all these with the SAC while you're going after the SAC with the U.S. attorney.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  Turn the heat up on him.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  When you bring what they're doing out of the state court and into the federal court,
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  whatever this prosecutor, whoever he was trying to protect, he's not going to be so quick to try to protect him
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  from when he's got the feds breathing down his neck.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see what the United States Postal Inspector does with their tampering with the mail.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  Well, file that with, file a complaint directly with the SAC as well.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  That's the one I did send him.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  Oh, and that's the one they didn't, they haven't done anything on, so good.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  File that one with, now file against him on that one with the U.S. attorney.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  And if he's still investigating it, then he could have let you know if not he can explain it to the U.S. attorney.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  When the U.S. attorney tries to blow it off, then you file against the U.S. attorney with the foreman of the federal grand jury.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  And then when the U.S. attorney intercepts it like the district attorney did, the U.S. attorney should recognize the process
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  because you'll be doing to him what you'll be setting him up for what you're doing to the district attorney.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  It'll be clear that you set up the district attorney so that you could go to him.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  And when you go to him, it's going to be clear to him you're setting him up so you can go to the next step.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  I just want these people to do their job.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  Exactly. This is how we get it done. It is a process. Nobody wants to do their job.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  Everybody wants their life easy. They don't want to do anything that is political.
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  So you're asking them to do something out of the ordinary they don't want to, especially since you're just a pro se and you're not one of their group.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  So you've got to take it to them. The more politics you create in the Fed, the more pressure is going to come on the state
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  because the Fed's eight actors are not going to be happy with the local yokels who got you sicken on them.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  It's all politics.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Okay, with that, let's move on to the Quo warranto that I sent registered mail to the attorney general's office.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  I sent it to the Sacramento office. Quo warrantos are handled out of Los Angeles.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  However, these other offices should know very well what to do with a Quo warranto.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  And, you know, they have pony mail, internal mail, and it should have been immediately sent forward.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  So they received it on September 20 of this year.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  Several weeks went by, got online, did some research, found this guy, sent an email to him.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  He is in charge of processing Quo warrantos. He is a lawyer.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  I sent an email to him and copied his boss and he responded within two hours in an email.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  They jacked me around and I received the letter in the mail today and the letter states,
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  we have received your correspondence and associated materials in which you seek our permission to file a Quo warranto lawsuit against
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  Seneca County Superior Court Judge, Thomas C. Hastings, on the ground that he failed to have the required oath of office and or bond on file
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  when he took actions in a court case in which you were a party. We must deny your request.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  First, we declined to proceed because the application you have submitted was not prepared by a licensed California attorney,
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  nor does it otherwise adhere to our filing requirements and they direct me to their webpage in California Code Regs
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  and then it goes second, in any event, the relief you seek is not available.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Under the de facto officer doctrines that are performed by an officer who is acting under the color of authority will not be notified
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  even if it is later discovered that there was some deficiency in the officer's appointment or election and then they cite some several cases.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  He assumed the remedy I was thinking, which is a mistake on his part.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  He assumed that I wanted the case against me dropped or what this judge did nullified and that's not really what I was seeking.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  And in California, there a Quo warranto, basically there are three questions and unfortunately again I don't have enough of the computer in front of me of one,
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  is the judge, is the person validly in office? Okay, which he responded to saying whether I, he was or wasn't, that's not going to help me.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  I'm not out to just help myself, I'm out to help the entire state.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Okay, hang on, hang on, back to you at a break.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Rand Kelton, rule of law radio, I call in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  And many still don't know what hemp is, so now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:33.000]  They are different varieties of the same species, hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:49.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:49.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempusa.org.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:09.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:09.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:29.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  The Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Ted in California.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  Okay, go ahead Ted.
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  So what I'm finding is this judge is being used as a ringer.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:47.000]  He retired some 11 years ago.
[01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  So they're playing games. Oh, he's a retired judge and he is not active with the bar,
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  but all the judges of California now actually go into a special status with the bar when they become judges.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  But here's what's going on.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  This guy doesn't have a valid oath of office and he's brought in, I personally know,
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  he's been brought into cases like a fixer or basically to screw somebody.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  And he gets bounced around, not only in our county, I think he goes to the team.
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  And I think their strategy behind this, I believe, is they think that he's got some kind of immunity.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:49.000]  You know, he's like what do you call it when you have a teacher out thick and bring in a substitute.
[01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  And that's what they do.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  They take a substitute and into a case when the defendant is prevailing and he screws them up.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  In my case, my experience, he was a raving lunatic screaming at me from the onset.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  You know, demanding my plea and all this stuff and it was bizarre.
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  But that's what caused me to look into him.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  And I found out about eight years ago, and I think I brought this up before, that he dismissed a rape case against a deputy GA.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  It was alleged that the deputy GA raped the coworker at lunchtime at his condo.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  And this deputy GA had like eight diners.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  This was a violent rape.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  And this went around in the courts for a long time.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  And then, voila, this got before this judge.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  And he wrote a almost 70-page decision dismissing the indictment.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  But basically, it's all DS because it whittles down to this.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  But he said because the grand jury was not made aware that the victim was paid $450,000 through workman's comp or through, you know, something like that that they had.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  But because they didn't know that, that the indictment should be dismissed.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  I asked the biggest pilot.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  Well, why don't you file federally against this judge for denying your due process?
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  I think I did also file a criminal complaint.
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  I guess I did.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Besides the court warrant, I did file a criminal complaint against him.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  That went to the, to our GA.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  And of course, nothing was done.
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  So, okay.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:02.000]  Okay, I see that.
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  All these guys to the feds for an ongoing criminal conspiracy to secret criminal complaints from the state grand jury denying you equal protection and the laws.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  Okay, that would be a separate case.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  What I'm doing right now, Randy, because I have a December 3rd trial date. This has been going on now for almost four years.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  I went in about eight weeks ago and for, for a trial setting conference, of course, it was a different judge.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  And I told the judge that, and by the way, the prosecuting attorney did not show up to this hearing.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  Just, just the deputy VA that sits there, you know, answered for the prosecuting deputy VA.
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  And I told the judge, this is not ready for trial.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  I said, I'm not getting discovery.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  I, I have motions that I am working on to file.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  And the judge said, well, you know, I'm putting it out on December 3rd.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  You can always motion.
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  There's, there's, there's ways to get that changed, you know, they don't want to give any legal advice.
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  But I, I said, well, I don't, I don't, I object and I don't, I haven't even gotten through the first round of discovery on this.
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  And file motion for continuance.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  Yeah, I'm going to set a motion.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  It's a what Audi House here, what we do is a motion to vacate the trial date.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  Okay.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  I expect.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  You have a challenge, a speedy trial request and so you move to vacate for cause so that it doesn't count against you.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  Okay. Well, I, after that preliminary hearing, that was two years ago.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  And I'm sorry, after the arraignment.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  And since then we have preliminary hearing and after the preliminary hearing, they added a second felony charge.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  And we went, I had a lawyer at the time and I waved time and that was about a year and a half ago.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  And so we've, we've been bouncing along here.
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  That attorney left the case after that, after that second arraignment and I've been representing myself ever since.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  I can't get the court to even give me a copy of the file.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  I have trouble getting, I can't get transcripts.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  I put in a motion.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  What does the law say about your right to get those documents?
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  Oh, it's absolutely positively my right.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  Didn't file a criminal against them with the feds.
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  Yeah. And I've already wrote a criminal complaint against the court clerk for refusing to give me a copy of the court file.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  You start bringing all your complaints into the fed.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  Feds are going to get real irritated with all these complaints, especially if you start filing against the U.S. attorney.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:46.000]  If you start pushing your complaints to the grand jury, the U.S. attorney is going to get real happy, unhappy.
[01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  And when he tries to threaten you, then you file against him in Washington, D.C.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  And when you file against him in Washington, D.C., with Trump as president,
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  I'm relatively certain he's going to be a Democrat.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  He is not going to be a happy camper since Trump has his resignation.
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:17.000]  Politics. You want to push it as high as you can.
[01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  Like I said, I expect that they're going to try to bum-rush me to trial on December 3rd.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  And there is no case here. I commit...
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:39.000]  There's a very, very good chance when you get to the courthouse steps, they'll dismiss everything.
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  There's a good chance of that. They're not going to want this getting into the court of appeals,
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  especially when you're making federal noises.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  Because they'll look at this going into the federal courts.
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  This could get out of their control and they could wind up with serious issues.
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  My handle. That's what they did with my handle.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  They huffed and puffed and jumped up and down and made all kinds of horrible threats.
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  But when they got to the courthouse steps, they made him a final deal offer
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  and he told them to stick it. They went into the court and dismissed everything.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  My concern is they know they have a huge liability.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  And that they know I'm going to sue their asses off for...
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  Wait a minute. This is radio. You can't say that. You can say anuses.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  Just kidding. Go ahead.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  You had me falling out of my chair laughing at the beginning of this show tonight, Randy,
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:50.000]  when you talked about you're not drunk.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  I'm old, okay?
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  Okay, but the rule is take the fed to the state and the state to the fed.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  So you wanted to get it out of their venue, out of something they feel like they can control.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Into the hands of someone who has other political pressures on him.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  The U.S. Attorney is one of those people.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  Then you start sending letters to Trump's office asking Trump to remove this U.S. Attorney for cause
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  and replace him with a Republican.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:40.000]  It's all politics at the end of the day.
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  I won't ask for a Republican. I'll just ask for a sensible person, which that means it ain't a Democrat.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:56.000]  I'm not going to touch that one because I got Democrats listening and they're not going to be happy.
[01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  I'm not political, but I'm looking at the politics here.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  Trump, I liked him because he's neither Democrat or Republican.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  He's just a gunfly and a pain in the rear and I figured that's what we needed.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  But he does have this U.S. Attorney's resignation and he does need appointees that will be supportive of him, especially in California.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:43.000]  So you got a U.S. Attorney there with the President has his resignation and now you've got this really ugly looking set of complaints
[01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  showing what appears to be an ongoing criminal conspiracy to heal all these guys from prosecution and deny you due process.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  All the President needs is an excuse and he may be ready for one.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  You don't know what the politics is in DC and you start making ugly political noises.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  This U.S. Attorney is not going to know what those politics are either and you're likely to terrify him and put him in a position to where he wants to get you off his case.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  And the only way he can do that is to clobber the guys below them.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Politics.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  Okay, we're about to go to break.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.000 --> 02:00:04.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.