[00:00.000 --> 00:07.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star of Lowdown, providing retailing
[00:07.800 --> 00:15.440]  bulletins for the commodities market, today's history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:15.440 --> 00:23.600]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.600 --> 00:29.640]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.640 --> 00:41.200]  Over $16.68 an ounce, Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel, Bitcoins $6,902.19, Ethereum $420.80,
[00:41.200 --> 00:55.560]  Bitcoin Cash $652.90, and Finanly Lite Coins $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:55.560 --> 01:01.240]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.240 --> 01:06.640]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion,
[01:06.640 --> 01:08.040]  sex, or national origin.
[01:08.040 --> 01:13.200]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.200 --> 01:18.320]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.320 --> 01:24.000]  Today in History.
[01:24.000 --> 01:28.000]  For recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.280]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.280 --> 01:36.720]  is being blamed on the democratically elected President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.720 --> 01:41.480]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.480 --> 01:43.360]  evidence as of yet.
[01:43.360 --> 01:46.840]  President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down
[01:46.840 --> 01:51.200]  any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice
[01:51.200 --> 01:55.800]  and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing
[01:55.800 --> 01:58.600]  animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:58.600 --> 02:02.640]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.640 --> 02:06.800]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.800 --> 02:11.040]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization
[02:11.040 --> 02:15.640]  for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.640 --> 02:19.400]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.000]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.800]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.800 --> 02:32.040]  notorious swinner groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.040 --> 02:37.880]  Now, surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[02:37.880 --> 02:42.200]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.200 --> 02:47.120]  has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:47.120 --> 02:54.120]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[03:17.120 --> 03:24.120]  I'm sure the people being victimized by criminal cops, psychopathic predators, terrorize the
[03:27.120 --> 03:31.360]  neighborhood block, equip with pepper spray made cocktails and glass, they like serial
[03:31.360 --> 03:35.360]  killers acting out subliminal thoughts, forget what you taught, these cops have got a license
[03:35.360 --> 03:39.360]  to kill, witness intimidation means that they can use it at will, co-disciples means that
[03:39.360 --> 03:43.360]  the people never let out a squeal, and if they go to court they know the judge will make
[03:43.360 --> 03:47.360]  it real, for real, that's why they're stopping me, locking me up and stopping me, complicating
[03:47.360 --> 03:51.360]  my property, talking in my demography, making the poor commodity profit an awful pile of
[03:51.360 --> 03:55.360]  these, in court, the politics, the poor, the prison, the economy, yeah, no one makes money
[03:55.360 --> 03:59.360]  when the violence stops, hating brutality is the way to make a criminal cry, blood in
[03:59.360 --> 04:03.360]  the gutters, how to risk what it ain't worth at the top, and that's why this is what happens
[04:03.360 --> 04:07.360]  when you call the cops, come on, this is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:07.360 --> 04:11.660]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host
[04:11.660 --> 04:18.480]  Eddie Craig, it is June 25th, 2018, we are live tonight, this is not an archive, just
[04:18.480 --> 04:24.840]  in case you're wondering, now that being said, I hope you pay close attention to the words
[04:24.840 --> 04:31.000]  of the opening song for this show that I put up a few months ago, and understand why I
[04:31.000 --> 04:40.320]  did so, there is more truth in this one song about the current state of America than in
[04:40.320 --> 04:46.920]  any number of songs you could line up and play back to back, and the reason we know
[04:46.920 --> 04:54.720]  it's true is because more and more what these guys do behind the scenes, or at least what
[04:54.720 --> 05:01.000]  they used to be behind the scenes, is getting exposed to the light of day because of cell
[05:01.000 --> 05:07.480]  phone cameras, security cameras, and people willing to come forward and testify against
[05:07.480 --> 05:17.600]  them. Now, you guys know that I'm a next deputy, I worked the county jail back home, it wasn't
[05:17.600 --> 05:21.520]  for a long period of time, never said I had years of experience at it, but I learned an
[05:21.520 --> 05:26.200]  awful lot while I was in it because like everything else I do, I don't half ask things when I
[05:26.200 --> 05:32.200]  go into it, I work my butt off to become the absolute best at whatever I undertake that
[05:32.200 --> 05:38.880]  I possibly can. I may not be first, but if I'm not, it will not be for lack of trying,
[05:38.880 --> 05:44.320]  I promise you. So the things that I pick up when I take something on, I accumulate at
[05:44.320 --> 05:50.280]  a very rapid rate. I experiment with it, I stretch it as far as I can, and I look for
[05:50.280 --> 05:56.440]  other ways to augment it as much as possible. This is how I approach learning law and everything
[05:56.440 --> 06:03.120]  else I've ever done in my life. Now, a lot of people out there would say well the number
[06:03.120 --> 06:06.120]  and amount of time you spent doesn't really make you an authority on any of this and blah
[06:06.120 --> 06:13.000]  blah blah, well I've got news for you. How long you do something is not necessarily relative
[06:13.000 --> 06:19.320]  to how well you are able to learn how to do it or to do it in the first place. We have
[06:19.320 --> 06:22.840]  proof of that in the very fact that there are people out there that have been in law enforcement
[06:22.840 --> 06:31.640]  for decades and still can't do it right, okay? And their version of right is what suits
[06:31.640 --> 06:37.120]  them and the power trip they're on. Not what the law says, not what they're actually allowed
[06:37.120 --> 06:42.680]  to do and so on and so forth. So if the measure of longevity is the measure of corruption,
[06:42.680 --> 06:50.760]  I'm glad I don't have that much time involved because that would be sad. All the things
[06:50.760 --> 06:54.880]  that I've learned and tried to share with other people, there are those who absolutely
[06:54.880 --> 07:00.240]  appreciate it and there are those who will absolutely pee on it before they'll even begin
[07:00.240 --> 07:04.920]  to consider it. Either because it goes against the way they want to do it, it goes against
[07:04.920 --> 07:08.760]  what they think they know, it goes against what they believe or it goes against what
[07:08.760 --> 07:16.360]  they feel. Take your pick or choice of mixture, however you want to do it. The fact remains
[07:16.360 --> 07:25.480]  that there are those that will ignore reality to pursue that which they want or wish for
[07:25.480 --> 07:35.080]  regardless of any ability to achieve it. Now, it's not that I don't want people to be motivated.
[07:35.080 --> 07:38.000]  It's not that I don't want people to push the envelope. It's not that I don't want people
[07:38.000 --> 07:43.880]  to try things that have never been tried before. But there comes a time that when it has been
[07:43.880 --> 07:52.040]  tried and it has been tried correctly according to all sources and it has failed utterly every
[07:52.040 --> 08:00.720]  single time that you might need to consider that it's not the people that's the problem.
[08:00.720 --> 08:07.440]  It is not the method that is as far as the system itself in this particular case, which
[08:07.440 --> 08:14.400]  is rare but true, is not the actual problem. It is that you are basing what you're doing
[08:14.400 --> 08:22.520]  on a bottomless foundation. What you think you're standing on is solid until you apply
[08:22.520 --> 08:30.080]  weight and it crumbles. That right there summarizes the epitome of the patronage arguments that
[08:30.080 --> 08:36.120]  I spend my days dealing with such as yesterday and today, for example, in some of these Facebook
[08:36.120 --> 08:41.800]  discussions. Now, on top of all this, when I'm trying to go through this and answer
[08:41.800 --> 08:46.080]  questions and provide information where I can in these forums, I have spent the better
[08:46.080 --> 08:52.800]  part of my day trying to go through some research material that I got, sent a request to the
[08:52.800 --> 08:56.760]  state law library for, which I got the documents on and I have been pouring through it with
[08:56.760 --> 09:01.360]  a fine tooth comb looking to see what else I may need in addition to it. And the reason
[09:01.360 --> 09:10.560]  it's important and took up so much of my time is because it goes directly to the information
[09:10.560 --> 09:15.040]  that I talked about in last Monday night's show dealing with both the Department of Public
[09:15.040 --> 09:18.440]  Safety, the Department of Transportation, how they were created, when they were created
[09:18.440 --> 09:25.360]  and so on and so forth. But it also goes directly to the heart of the facts asserted in the
[09:25.360 --> 09:33.240]  constitutional challenge motion to SB 971. So the folks that are still waiting on a copy
[09:33.240 --> 09:38.280]  of that, it's not that I have forgotten you, it's not that I'm ignoring you. Please understand
[09:38.280 --> 09:43.080]  that as I'm doing updates on the material, I get in the middle of something and I'm trying
[09:43.080 --> 09:48.760]  to get it fixed and I lost the original of the constitutional challenge. I don't know
[09:48.760 --> 09:53.600]  how the one that I was sending out, I have no idea how I managed to misplace the one
[09:53.600 --> 09:59.880]  copy that was more complete than the rest. It wasn't as new as the rest of it, but it
[09:59.880 --> 10:06.080]  was organized better, it was interlinked better, it had the case law in it better and so on
[10:06.080 --> 10:10.880]  and so forth. But somehow or other I've managed to lose the only copy that I could find or
[10:10.880 --> 10:17.080]  had available. And now I'm having to piece together the different iterations that I had
[10:17.080 --> 10:24.040]  did getting to that point and making a single one out of it, but I'm also trying to integrate
[10:24.040 --> 10:32.320]  the new information at the same time and it's taking, because it is such a massive amount
[10:32.320 --> 10:39.440]  of resources in the statutes and the legislative history, it's a massive document. When you
[10:39.440 --> 10:45.120]  put it in at one and a half spacing instead of the double space the court wants it in,
[10:45.120 --> 10:54.880]  it's 74 pages long, okay? So if I increase that by another 50%, well it's 130 something
[10:54.880 --> 11:02.640]  page motion by the time we're all said and done, see? And that's a lot of information
[11:02.640 --> 11:09.800]  for anybody to wade through. So as I'm trying to get it rewritten I'm trying to take out
[11:09.800 --> 11:18.040]  superfluous language, repetitive language, and basically whittle the entire redwood
[11:18.040 --> 11:24.480]  down into the smallest toothpick I can. Right now the toothpick is about 140 feet long and
[11:24.480 --> 11:30.440]  weighs several tons. So until I get beyond that I can't even lift it to send it to one
[11:30.440 --> 11:36.400]  of you and get it anywhere. So please be patient. I'm not trying to ignore you or shove you
[11:36.400 --> 11:42.240]  aside. This is just a lot more involved and complex that it appears on the surface when
[11:42.240 --> 11:48.120]  you hear me talk about it. And the reason for that is because I've already formulated
[11:48.120 --> 11:52.480]  the argument. I've already looked up the facts. When I'm sitting here talking to you about
[11:52.480 --> 11:57.560]  it, I've already either written it down or got it ingrained, but it may or may not be
[11:57.560 --> 12:02.680]  in its final form, especially when I've written it down. That may just be my preliminary review
[12:02.680 --> 12:09.080]  of it that I'm trying to teach you about that time on the air. So please bear with me. There
[12:09.080 --> 12:13.880]  are lots of other ways to go after these particular cases rather than just the constitutional
[12:13.880 --> 12:18.640]  challenge motion. And those are all available in the seminar. At least that package is still
[12:18.640 --> 12:23.720]  wrapped up nice and neat and ready to go out as far as the original version of it goes.
[12:23.720 --> 12:27.640]  But as I'm getting through the new one I am integrating more and more information, but
[12:27.640 --> 12:34.840]  I am trying to refine it and boil it down to its more of an essence of what it means
[12:34.840 --> 12:40.360]  instead of a straight detail on everything it means. Because the detail is what you need
[12:40.360 --> 12:47.240]  to understand it, but the essence is what you need to see it big picture. Okay? So understand
[12:47.240 --> 12:51.280]  the distinction between the two. The reason these documents and writings and everything
[12:51.280 --> 12:58.280]  get so involved is when you get into the details. And as much as they dislike having to read
[12:58.280 --> 13:03.920]  it, courts run on details. Because if you don't provide them with a detail, then they
[13:03.920 --> 13:10.760]  tend to make up their own version and that is not something you want to do. Now on top
[13:10.760 --> 13:17.760]  of all of that, another thing I have been working on for the last four or five days
[13:17.760 --> 13:25.200]  is writing a Title 42 lawsuit. This one is directed at a specific judge in a specific
[13:25.200 --> 13:31.520]  court on behalf of a specific individual for crimes that this judge has committed under
[13:31.520 --> 13:39.720]  color of his official office. Now we've already levied criminal accusations against a JP and
[13:39.720 --> 13:45.840]  we actually got the county attorney prosecuting this gentleman's case to take the criminal
[13:45.840 --> 13:52.360]  complaint. He didn't want it, but he took it. Okay? And we informed him right then he
[13:52.360 --> 13:57.320]  had a duty under the law to forward it to the grand jury, which we're going to check
[13:57.320 --> 14:01.920]  the minutes of the grand jury and see if that was ever done. If it was not, then the next
[14:01.920 --> 14:06.400]  set of complaints that goes up not only has the original one, but it's also got one against
[14:06.400 --> 14:13.600]  this county attorney for secreting the original criminal complaint, shielding from prosecution
[14:13.600 --> 14:18.640]  and a corrupt public official and conspiring with that public official to protect them
[14:18.640 --> 14:25.280]  in their crimes. And that of course is going to trickle up to their boss, who we will take
[14:25.280 --> 14:29.240]  it to directly at that point. And then when they do nothing with it, we'll repeat the
[14:29.240 --> 14:34.280]  process and add their boss to the mix, just like Randy suggests. And it's not that that's
[14:34.280 --> 14:39.600]  not a good plan and it's not that it's not the way to do it, it's just time consuming.
[14:39.600 --> 14:47.160]  Now in this Title 42 lawsuit, I have had to sit down and read through several different
[14:47.160 --> 14:53.720]  lawsuits that have been written over the last couple decades or so, because I want to see
[14:53.720 --> 15:00.600]  how the original old school attorneys wrote them versus how the newer people are writing
[15:00.600 --> 15:06.400]  them. So I can see where the court may have shifted the way it wants to view an argument.
[15:06.400 --> 15:11.120]  I'm all about trying to do this the best, cleanest way possible that'll get the most
[15:11.120 --> 15:17.360]  attention from the judge. So in that regard, I've had to delve into a half a dozen or so
[15:17.360 --> 15:24.760]  lawsuits so far, and I've got about two dozen more to dig through to get myself collected
[15:24.760 --> 15:28.800]  on how I want to write this one. It's the same way I went about designing my first
[15:28.800 --> 15:34.000]  aquaponic system on a commercial scale was I took everything I learned, good, bad and
[15:34.000 --> 15:39.240]  ugly from all the other stuff and tried to figure out and distill it down to the best
[15:39.240 --> 15:45.160]  practices for the design that I've come up with, that I'm trying to get also drawn out
[15:45.160 --> 15:54.400]  and make a 3D model of so that I can use it to get certified for organic growing and
[15:54.400 --> 15:59.720]  so on and so forth. And let me tell you just real quick off the topic of law and onto aquaponics
[15:59.720 --> 16:09.280]  here for just a half a second, but you would be astounded how absolutely frustrating it
[16:09.280 --> 16:21.240]  is to try to find materials in America and Texas too that are food safe to build these
[16:21.240 --> 16:27.400]  systems out of. The more research I do on how the like supermarkets with their produce
[16:27.400 --> 16:32.680]  misting systems and some of these people that are making all of these certified organic
[16:32.680 --> 16:37.280]  systems, but when you look at what they've got the system constructed of, you have to
[16:37.280 --> 16:42.440]  wonder how they got organically certified because a lot of the plastic stuff they're
[16:42.440 --> 16:49.120]  using like PVC pipe, spray nozzles and stuff like this are all made with toxic chemicals
[16:49.120 --> 16:54.640]  that aren't supposed to be used for this purpose. And so that's been frustrating too. Y'all
[16:54.640 --> 17:01.640]  hang on, we'll be right back to continue with the show.
[17:01.640 --> 17:10.280]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.280 --> 17:17.520]  Gun Works. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[17:17.520 --> 17:23.800]  to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical
[17:23.800 --> 17:30.640]  AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:30.640 --> 17:36.800]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get ten
[17:36.800 --> 17:43.600]  chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.600 --> 17:48.400]  shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the
[17:48.400 --> 17:55.240]  best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.240 --> 18:00.640]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.960]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.960 --> 18:10.160]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[18:10.160 --> 18:15.080]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll
[18:15.080 --> 18:19.960]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:19.960 --> 18:25.360]  rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.360 --> 18:30.000]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:30.000 --> 18:35.280]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris Proven
[18:35.280 --> 18:40.680]  Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available
[18:40.680 --> 18:46.040]  as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael
[18:46.040 --> 18:56.440]  Mearris banner or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.440 --> 19:00.440]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.440 --> 19:11.440]  All right folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio.com.
[19:11.440 --> 19:35.360]  Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig, and as I was saying before, with the break,
[19:35.360 --> 19:39.680]  these systems that these people and these big commercial setups and everything have
[19:39.680 --> 19:45.400]  built, they're full of toxic plastics, ABS plastics in the spray nozzle, which leaches
[19:45.400 --> 19:52.400]  toxins into every drop of water that comes out of that mister. The PVC pipe that leaches
[19:52.400 --> 19:58.400]  into the water over as it ages and does so over time if it's exposed to sunlight, which
[19:58.400 --> 20:04.000]  in these greenhouses it almost always is and so on and so forth. Even some of the tubs
[20:04.000 --> 20:11.680]  and tanks and stuff like that they're using are not food safe tanks. They all are made
[20:11.680 --> 20:17.560]  out of plastics that leach toxic chemicals and yet these places got organic certified
[20:17.560 --> 20:25.080]  and I'm trying to figure out how. But I am actually looking to find the materials that
[20:25.080 --> 20:32.920]  are food safe to construct mine with and it is difficult beyond all imagination to find
[20:32.920 --> 20:39.360]  anyone that supplies it. And if you do manage to find one thing here or there, it is so
[20:39.360 --> 20:45.280]  prohibitively expensive, it almost makes no sense to try to buy it. So it's a difficult
[20:45.280 --> 20:50.280]  situation either way. But anyway, different subject that I'll be getting into on a separate
[20:50.280 --> 20:55.520]  blog on the website as well and everything else. But if you're wondering why you haven't
[20:55.520 --> 21:00.720]  seen the plan yet, it's because I'm still devising how I'm going to set it up because
[21:00.720 --> 21:06.440]  I'm not sure yet what materials for the plumbing and everything I'm actually going to be able
[21:06.440 --> 21:12.840]  to use, which is going to affect how I have to hook it all up and how I have to run everything.
[21:12.840 --> 21:18.120]  So until I get that part figured out and find a source for supplies, it may take longer
[21:18.120 --> 21:25.320]  than I thought. Now that being said, the phones are on. The calling number is 512-646-1984
[21:25.320 --> 21:30.600]  if you want to call in and ask a question or just anything like that. Remember that
[21:30.600 --> 21:36.160]  it is not a listener line. Please don't call into the caller board and hang out to listen
[21:36.160 --> 21:41.160]  to the show. If you stay there, not only do you run up the phone bill on the network,
[21:41.160 --> 21:44.960]  but you prevent other people from calling in because you're taking up one of the very
[21:44.960 --> 21:49.920]  few spots we have. So if at all possible, please listen to the show over the internet
[21:49.920 --> 21:54.920]  on your phone or over your computer internet connection if you're at home and so on and
[21:54.920 --> 22:01.200]  so forth, not on the listener or the calling line. Now, while we're going through that,
[22:01.200 --> 22:09.320]  let's go back to the other stuff I was talking about originally, the Title 42 lawsuit especially.
[22:09.320 --> 22:17.880]  There appears to be only one correct way to write a Title 42 lawsuit and any variances
[22:17.880 --> 22:28.560]  to that are small to none and usually they deal only with the specific facts and maybe
[22:28.560 --> 22:36.600]  just maybe a little bit of the way you word your complaint, but not a lot because if you
[22:36.600 --> 22:42.840]  don't cite certain elements for certain types of charges that you're trying to make and
[22:42.840 --> 22:49.720]  recover under, the court won't pay attention to it. Now, I don't know why that is because
[22:49.720 --> 22:55.400]  that is something they've been prohibited to do for decades by the Supreme Court, but
[22:55.400 --> 23:01.440]  they're still doing it. Some of these cases that I've read have been the intent of reading
[23:01.440 --> 23:09.560]  ones that failed, that the court dismissed on a 12b6 or whatever reason to try to figure
[23:09.560 --> 23:19.320]  out why the court found it necessary to dismiss the complaint and the reasons that I'm getting
[23:19.320 --> 23:25.040]  make it very clear that these judges are being far more picky than they should be from a
[23:25.040 --> 23:31.920]  pro se to begin with and just from the way the facts have to be stated in general. The
[23:31.920 --> 23:38.840]  courts as far as the people are concerned are supposed to make the effort to determine
[23:38.840 --> 23:46.040]  what the individual filing the suit is actually requesting and whether or not they have a
[23:46.040 --> 23:53.360]  proper claim once the judge determines what they're requesting. The court is required
[23:53.360 --> 24:02.480]  to do that, but these lazy bums don't want to do it. We have all these public servants
[24:02.480 --> 24:10.160]  making all this money off of us, but who do so with such an entitlement mentality that
[24:10.160 --> 24:18.200]  they feel they should get paid whether they're fully doing their job or not. I've got a problem
[24:18.200 --> 24:27.440]  with that, a big problem with that. Now, the reason that's important is because the judge
[24:27.440 --> 24:32.600]  that I'm saying that we were going to, that this lawsuit I'm writing up is directed at,
[24:32.600 --> 24:38.840]  has completely abused the power of his office. He has illegally falsified court documents
[24:38.840 --> 24:46.320]  which we can prove. He has acted with the intent to maliciously cause harm to the defendant
[24:46.320 --> 24:55.080]  in the case by his falsification. He has falsely reported information to another state agency
[24:55.080 --> 25:03.880]  which is a felony in Texas. He has abused the laws of Texas under the abuse of official
[25:03.880 --> 25:12.360]  capacity, official oppression, and simulation of legal process, penal code statutes, not
[25:12.360 --> 25:16.680]  only against this defendant, but every defendant's ever appeared in this court, and we have records
[25:16.680 --> 25:23.400]  of that as well. It holds true for the majority of these courts and these judges. They are
[25:23.400 --> 25:33.480]  every single one doing it wrong, and they're doing it criminally. Now, on my Facebook group
[25:33.480 --> 25:42.560]  I have posted an actual copy of the criminal complaint that we wrote against the JP in
[25:42.560 --> 25:50.160]  the case that is resulting from the falsification of government records that the first judge
[25:50.160 --> 25:55.520]  did. Okay? So there's two judges involved with this one individual right now under two
[25:55.520 --> 26:00.920]  separate cases. The original judge that falsified the information to the Department of Public
[26:00.920 --> 26:07.800]  Safety that prevented his license from being renewed, and then the fact that he was arrested
[26:07.800 --> 26:13.920]  by a DPS officer and charged with driving while licensed invalid because he could not
[26:13.920 --> 26:20.120]  get that license renewed due to the original judge's falsification. But the JP in the second
[26:20.120 --> 26:27.240]  case acted illegally under Texas law by sending out a notice that does not comply with the
[26:27.240 --> 26:36.000]  requirements of a proper summons. Under Texas law, that is called simulation of legal process.
[26:36.000 --> 26:46.160]  It is illegal to do, but every single municipal and JP court in the state of Texas does it
[26:46.160 --> 26:55.200]  the same way. Not a single one of them send out a validly formatted summons as required
[26:55.200 --> 27:02.080]  by law. Not a single one of them put the information on those things they send out that the law
[27:02.080 --> 27:12.440]  requires to be on it. And yet, on its face, it contains language threatening punishment.
[27:12.440 --> 27:17.440]  If the person does not comply with the order of appearing before the court in relation
[27:17.440 --> 27:24.400]  to that document. This is a direct violation of the statute for a simulation of legal process
[27:24.400 --> 27:32.560]  under the penal code. Let's see, 32.48, I think it is, is the statute. But when you go
[27:32.560 --> 27:41.320]  and read it, that statute was written to curb the activities of the Republic of Texas folks
[27:41.320 --> 27:47.400]  and their courts that they created and formulated and all the forms and things they were sending
[27:47.400 --> 27:54.400]  out to public officials and warrants and all this stuff. But it is not worded in a way
[27:54.400 --> 28:00.760]  that limits it to those of a particular group of people. The way it is worded, it applies
[28:00.760 --> 28:15.160]  to anyone, even an actual Texas court. Okay? So, given that, this county attorney, when
[28:15.160 --> 28:21.680]  we gave him the criminal complaint, had a duty to submit it to the grand jury. That's
[28:21.680 --> 28:27.760]  what their duties are under Chapter 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In 2.03, 2.04,
[28:27.760 --> 28:32.720]  and 2.05, they are specifically directed on the things they must do when a complaint is
[28:32.720 --> 28:41.520]  presented to them or made before them. They're not doing their job either. Okay? So, what
[28:41.520 --> 28:47.080]  we're trying to do by all these things is we're trying to get all of the necessary records,
[28:47.080 --> 28:53.280]  all the necessary proof that we need to show that there is a statewide criminal conspiracy
[28:53.280 --> 29:00.160]  between the TMCEC, the prosecuting attorneys at the county and municipal levels, as well
[29:00.160 --> 29:07.480]  as the DAs in cases where the county attorney is not the prosecutor at the county level,
[29:07.480 --> 29:14.120]  and that the judges themselves are sanctioning this criminal conspiracy and aiding and abetting
[29:14.120 --> 29:21.240]  its commission. When this is all said and done, all the documents that we're going to
[29:21.240 --> 29:28.000]  have accumulated should show that interlink in a manner that is going to be absolutely
[29:28.000 --> 29:38.440]  undeniable, because the statutes are very, very clear on what the requirements are. Yet,
[29:38.440 --> 29:45.800]  what they're doing is very, very clearly being done in violation of those statutes, and no
[29:45.800 --> 29:51.640]  one is being held accountable for it, despite the number of complaints being filed about
[29:51.640 --> 29:55.800]  it. So, we may get the Bar Association and Judicial Conduct Committee convicted right
[29:55.800 --> 30:16.800]  along with them. Wish us luck. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[30:16.800 --> 30:43.800]  We'll be right back.
[30:43.800 --> 30:50.840]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify
[30:50.840 --> 30:56.240]  and track people on the streets. Now, clothing companies in Europe, Canada, and America are
[30:56.240 --> 31:01.600]  getting in on the act. So, where do they hide the cameras? In the eyes of mannequins. That's
[31:01.600 --> 31:07.000]  right, those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:07.000 --> 31:12.760]  They're called eye-seers, and their job is to log the age, gender, and race of passersby
[31:12.760 --> 31:18.200]  so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy. But, hang on, aren't mannequins
[31:18.200 --> 31:23.680]  spooky enough already? This is taking weird science to a whole new level. I'm Dr.
[31:23.680 --> 31:31.600]  Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.600 --> 31:36.960]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.960 --> 31:42.400]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:42.400 --> 31:46.320]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[31:46.320 --> 31:51.000]  lives and thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm
[31:51.000 --> 31:57.080]  a structural engineer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans,
[31:57.080 --> 32:02.080]  and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.080 --> 32:07.080]  Rule of Law radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:07.080 --> 32:10.080]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a
[32:10.080 --> 32:14.120]  free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:14.120 --> 32:17.320]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[32:17.320 --> 32:21.320]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[32:21.320 --> 32:24.960]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our
[32:24.960 --> 32:28.880]  rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule
[32:28.880 --> 32:32.560]  of Law radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:32.560 --> 32:36.600]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[32:36.600 --> 32:40.680]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[32:40.680 --> 32:44.600]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[32:44.600 --> 32:49.080]  Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of
[32:49.080 --> 32:52.760]  research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[32:52.760 --> 32:57.080]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we
[32:57.080 --> 33:03.080]  can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:03.080 --> 33:10.080]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:33.080 --> 33:40.080]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[34:03.080 --> 34:10.080]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[34:16.600 --> 34:22.000]  Okay, now, since we're going after these people, we've got our work cut out for us, and we're
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.760]  going to be working on it hard. So if I don't get back to you an email or anything else
[34:26.760 --> 34:31.600]  like that right away, please understand. I am the only one working on this. I am the
[34:31.600 --> 34:38.600]  only one writing this. I'm the only one researching this. So I'm busy, okay? That being said,
[34:40.080 --> 34:45.280]  let's get on with our callers. First one up for this evening is James in Texas. James,
[34:45.280 --> 34:52.280]  what can we do for you? James, if you're there, you're muted.
[34:52.280 --> 34:59.280]  Hello, James. Alright, we'll come back to James. James is dropped off, okay? Well,
[35:03.280 --> 35:08.280]  there's that. Alright, let's try Eric in California. Eric, what can we do for you?
[35:08.280 --> 35:09.280]  Hey Eddie.
[35:09.280 --> 35:10.280]  Howdy.
[35:10.280 --> 35:17.280]  Just calling in to, how are you? Just want to let you know that successively I used your
[35:17.280 --> 35:23.280]  script to beat a 12-road violation out here in California.
[35:23.280 --> 35:24.280]  Cool.
[35:24.280 --> 35:25.280]  Which script?
[35:25.280 --> 35:30.280]  This one I think I got from one year 2013 or 2014 episodes. It's the one that says that
[35:30.280 --> 35:37.280]  other than the fact that you don't know if I'm behind the wheel, you're not offering me
[35:37.280 --> 35:44.280]  the opportunity to go before a judge. So this sounds like it's a bill of pains and penalties
[35:46.480 --> 35:53.320]  which are outlawed by the California Constitution. I decided that.
[35:53.320 --> 35:58.320]  Well, every Constitution. Well, good.
[35:58.320 --> 36:00.320]  I decided the one from California.
[36:00.320 --> 36:05.320]  I mean, these people tend to forget that what they're doing is not lawful. Not lawful.
[36:05.320 --> 36:10.320]  What they're doing is not lawful. Not by a long shot. They just hope that you don't know
[36:10.320 --> 36:12.320]  it and you agree to it.
[36:12.320 --> 36:19.320]  Correct. Yeah, it took one letter. What they did was they took a freeway here in Los Angeles
[36:19.320 --> 36:24.320]  that had a car pool lane and then they started charging for it decades later just recently
[36:24.320 --> 36:28.320]  and started charging for it. And we're like, that's ridiculous. So we're driving on all
[36:28.320 --> 36:34.320]  the toll roads and using this and doing that. So far we haven't paid.
[36:34.320 --> 36:37.320]  Oh, good. I'm knocked off. Good.
[36:37.320 --> 36:40.320]  So thank you for that. Yes, sir.
[36:40.320 --> 36:46.320]  My question tonight would be, when it comes to doing business activities, when do you
[36:46.320 --> 36:51.320]  have to get a permit or a business license and when can you tell the government to go
[36:51.320 --> 36:53.320]  and count and say it?
[36:53.320 --> 36:58.320]  Well, when the business is one that has a direct public interest, for instance, like
[36:58.320 --> 37:05.320]  the practice of medicine or engineering, things that involve directly the health and
[37:05.320 --> 37:09.320]  welfare of the general public. That's why electricians have to have licenses.
[37:09.320 --> 37:14.320]  That's why plumbers have to have licenses because if they install something while they're
[37:14.320 --> 37:20.320]  getting paid to install it in someone else's house or property and it burns down or floods,
[37:20.320 --> 37:24.320]  then they're on the hook for that because they did it wrong.
[37:24.320 --> 37:30.320]  And so same thing with doctors and all these other people, they have to be licensed because
[37:30.320 --> 37:35.320]  the jobs they do directly impact the public health and welfare.
[37:35.320 --> 37:46.320]  Otherwise, if it's an occupation of common right, then they can't force you to get a license to do it.
[37:46.320 --> 37:51.320]  Like for instance, some of the most cities will require you to get a business license to do
[37:51.320 --> 37:54.320]  business in their city.
[37:54.320 --> 37:59.320]  Only if you're incorporated. You have a right to conduct business as a human being.
[37:59.320 --> 38:04.320]  They can only make you get a license from them to open a business if your business is
[38:04.320 --> 38:09.320]  incorporated or it's a business affecting public interest, like I said.
[38:09.320 --> 38:11.320]  Okay.
[38:11.320 --> 38:17.320]  And then what's your take on the reasons the Supreme Court ruling about the internet tax?
[38:17.320 --> 38:22.320]  I mean, I've heard you talk before that it can only possibly apply to if you're incorporated
[38:22.320 --> 38:24.320]  and under certain circumstances.
[38:24.320 --> 38:30.320]  Well, that sales tax in general as far as them forcing you to collect it.
[38:30.320 --> 38:37.320]  And nothing the Supreme Court ruled is going to do that for a mom and pop business that
[38:37.320 --> 38:41.320]  the state cannot compel them to act as its tax collector for them.
[38:41.320 --> 38:45.320]  But as far as corporate businesses, I'm completely against the ruling.
[38:45.320 --> 38:52.320]  There is no logical basis for the Supreme Court after all this time changing that except to
[38:52.320 --> 38:55.320]  increase government revenue and control.
[38:55.320 --> 39:00.320]  That's the only reason it could have been done because there was nothing else that could
[39:00.320 --> 39:03.320]  even be a good result from what they did.
[39:03.320 --> 39:05.320]  Nothing.
[39:05.320 --> 39:13.320]  Because now they have a hugely increased burden on businesses to track what states they sell
[39:13.320 --> 39:17.320]  so that the tax rates that are going to be different and every one of them can be paid
[39:17.320 --> 39:21.320]  properly or they're going to lose money on every sale because of it.
[39:21.320 --> 39:27.320]  Or the state making claims against businesses that they owe themselves tax when in fact they don't.
[39:27.320 --> 39:31.320]  So their litigation bill and all this other stuff is going to go up as well.
[39:31.320 --> 39:32.320]  It's a complete mess.
[39:32.320 --> 39:36.320]  And the Supreme Court has screwed everybody by what they ruled.
[39:36.320 --> 39:39.320]  Yeah.
[39:39.320 --> 39:43.320]  Okay.
[39:43.320 --> 39:47.320]  Are you and Dave working on the next movie?
[39:47.320 --> 39:49.320]  Well, come tax.
[39:49.320 --> 39:51.320]  It's not up to us to work on it.
[39:51.320 --> 39:54.320]  We both have the material and information and are ready to do it.
[39:54.320 --> 39:59.320]  But the people with the money and the resources are the ones going to decide if and when they're going to.
[39:59.320 --> 40:02.320]  They were talking about it if our other one did well.
[40:02.320 --> 40:08.320]  Turns out that obviously people don't want to learn anything.
[40:08.320 --> 40:13.320]  Because the sales of the movie were not nearly as good as we expected them to be,
[40:13.320 --> 40:16.320]  which was surprising considering what it was about.
[40:16.320 --> 40:20.320]  So who knows what America is ready for and willing to accept anymore.
[40:20.320 --> 40:22.320]  They'll swallow a lie all day long.
[40:22.320 --> 40:27.320]  But when you feed them the truth, they choke on it.
[40:27.320 --> 40:32.320]  Yeah, I recently had a discussion with an employer's PPA about this.
[40:32.320 --> 40:36.320]  And they just end up walking away.
[40:36.320 --> 40:39.320]  They just throw their hands up in there and they don't want to do their due diligence to research.
[40:39.320 --> 40:43.320]  No, because they've already been told this is how you'll do it.
[40:43.320 --> 40:45.320]  And they don't want to go beyond that.
[40:45.320 --> 40:51.320]  This has become an issue of where everybody is acting for their own self-preservation,
[40:51.320 --> 40:58.320]  they think up until the individual that they're hosing over by not doing their due diligence
[40:58.320 --> 41:02.320]  decides to take action against them and hold them accountable for it.
[41:02.320 --> 41:06.320]  But then again, you've got to show that it's not somebody you were just having a discussion with,
[41:06.320 --> 41:11.320]  but someone that was taking your money and withholding it from you illegally.
[41:11.320 --> 41:17.320]  Is there any remedy for someone that is, I don't know, like beyond the interview process,
[41:17.320 --> 41:21.320]  you've been offered the job and you don't want to complete a W-9 or a W-4
[41:21.320 --> 41:24.320]  and then they retract the job offer.
[41:24.320 --> 41:28.320]  Is there any remedy for that person to go after the company or the...
[41:28.320 --> 41:32.320]  If you can document that that's the reason they did it,
[41:32.320 --> 41:36.320]  that you would not authorize them to steal your money, then you might have a lawsuit
[41:36.320 --> 41:41.320]  if you can figure out a way to make the claim.
[41:41.320 --> 41:46.320]  But that's the only way you're going to get anything out of it.
[41:46.320 --> 41:48.320]  Yeah, the same.
[41:48.320 --> 41:55.320]  It is, but such as the system we're stuck in right now because of those who control it.
[41:55.320 --> 41:58.320]  It's amazing. I've talked to a few CPAs and tax attorneys.
[41:58.320 --> 42:02.320]  They don't know one thing about the income tax law.
[42:02.320 --> 42:03.320]  No, they don't.
[42:03.320 --> 42:12.320]  I mean, when I was a computer consultant and one of the contracts I had was a network migration for Sprint up in Rockville, Maryland.
[42:12.320 --> 42:15.320]  I was working in Maryland, living over in Centerville, Virginia,
[42:15.320 --> 42:22.320]  and I did three different contracts, four different contracts while I was living up there to do this stuff.
[42:22.320 --> 42:29.320]  But one of the things that I did while I was in DC, because the second project I did while I was up there,
[42:29.320 --> 42:34.320]  was rewriting the federal budget software for Congress because of Y2K.
[42:34.320 --> 42:41.320]  So while I was up there, I was leading the team of people that was rewriting the new software for the United States Congress to use.
[42:41.320 --> 42:56.320]  But on one of my, I took an extended lunch one day and went over and had a meeting with the House Ways and Means Committee head attorney on income tax.
[42:56.320 --> 43:00.320]  And we were in his conference room in his law library.
[43:00.320 --> 43:07.320]  We had law books scattered all over the table, and I had this guy in a screaming fit.
[43:07.320 --> 43:17.320]  Now this is an actual attorney, and he was livid that every single time he would argue something about a statute,
[43:17.320 --> 43:24.320]  I'd flip to another section and say, you're reading that without this, you're also skipping over that word, that word, and that word,
[43:24.320 --> 43:33.320]  and you can't do that because it changes the meaning of the statute, because when you take those words and you look them up over here in the definition section for that section,
[43:33.320 --> 43:38.320]  you'll find out it means something completely different than you're saying and you're screwed.
[43:38.320 --> 43:43.320]  Oh man, you would think somebody had set off a firecracker in his butthole the way he carried on.
[43:43.320 --> 43:46.320]  I mean this dude was out of it.
[43:46.320 --> 43:52.320]  He was screaming at me, his own people walking by his door looking at him in there like he's lost his mind.
[43:52.320 --> 43:56.320]  Hang on just a sec, we're about to take a break and I'll finish this on the other side.
[43:56.320 --> 44:03.320]  Hang on folks, we shall return.
[44:27.320 --> 44:33.320]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.320 --> 44:42.320]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.320 --> 44:51.320]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.320 --> 45:00.320]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.320 --> 45:09.320]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturesdureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store
[45:09.320 --> 45:15.320]  at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[45:15.320 --> 45:18.320]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.320 --> 45:23.320]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.320 --> 45:27.320]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.320 --> 45:31.320]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.320 --> 45:38.320]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturesdureorganics.com.
[45:38.320 --> 45:43.320]  That's 512-264-4043 naturesdureorganics.com.
[45:43.320 --> 45:48.320]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.320 --> 46:14.320]  Naturesdureorganics.com
[46:18.320 --> 46:31.320]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984
[46:31.320 --> 46:34.320]  and we are talking to Eric in California.
[46:34.320 --> 46:38.320]  Yeah, anyway, that Ways and Means Committee head attorney.
[46:38.320 --> 46:42.320]  Ah man, his people thought he had lost his ever-loving mind.
[46:42.320 --> 46:47.320]  I have never had a so-called professional screaming like that at the top of their lungs
[46:47.320 --> 46:51.320]  telling me I didn't know what I was talking about
[46:51.320 --> 46:55.320]  because I was showing him that I do exactly what I was talking about
[46:55.320 --> 46:59.320]  and that he was the one in fact that didn't know what he was talking about.
[46:59.320 --> 47:06.320]  It would have been hilarious to have had that conversation recorded.
[47:06.320 --> 47:09.320]  Yeah, that's exactly my experience as well.
[47:09.320 --> 47:13.320]  You start the law form and they either don't want to look it up or they want to ignore it.
[47:13.320 --> 47:16.320]  Yeah, or they want to say it means something it doesn't say
[47:16.320 --> 47:21.320]  and they want to read it outside the context of the other things to which it relates
[47:21.320 --> 47:27.320]  and everyone of them are guilty of doing that, whether it be the professional or the judge.
[47:27.320 --> 47:30.320]  They're not looking at the law as a whole like they're required to do.
[47:30.320 --> 47:34.320]  They're looking only at the part that supports the position they want to take.
[47:34.320 --> 47:40.320]  Not the one that says the position you have is wrong because you're missing 15 things over here.
[47:40.320 --> 47:45.320]  You're supposed to be including.
[47:45.320 --> 47:49.320]  Yeah, I know that all too well.
[47:49.320 --> 47:51.320]  Last question for tonight.
[47:51.320 --> 48:02.320]  Is there any reason or necessity to get your car deregistered if it is registered with your state DMV?
[48:02.320 --> 48:06.320]  Well, it depends on how private you want to be.
[48:06.320 --> 48:11.320]  The more things you have registered with government, the more things they can track.
[48:11.320 --> 48:14.320]  That's one reason not to do it.
[48:14.320 --> 48:18.320]  Well, if you go back and look at the history of registration,
[48:18.320 --> 48:23.320]  the only thing that you're actually agreeing to as a private individual by registering your car
[48:23.320 --> 48:30.320]  is that the state has access to the necessary information to help recover it if it is stolen,
[48:30.320 --> 48:41.320]  though they are not required to prioritize that or in their eyes to even actually provide the service of looking for it.
[48:41.320 --> 48:49.320]  So that would be an individual interest, which the courts say the cops are not obligated to protect anyone under.
[48:49.320 --> 48:51.320]  So it's a catch-22.
[48:51.320 --> 48:58.320]  You're being told the reason they invented the process was to track stolen material and property and help recover it,
[48:58.320 --> 49:04.320]  but over here they're telling you we don't have to provide that service even if you register it and pay us some money to do it.
[49:04.320 --> 49:12.320]  So what the courts are actually ruling is they can take your money saying they're taking it because they have to get paid to do a job,
[49:12.320 --> 49:20.320]  but then they're not required to do the actual job, which makes it fraud.
[49:20.320 --> 49:22.320]  Yeah, there's a lot of things to do that's fraud.
[49:22.320 --> 49:27.320]  Well, not arguing that as being an incorrect statement by any means.
[49:27.320 --> 49:38.320]  Okay, so I'm on my second round with the California DMV to get my car D registered under the pretense of fraud that it was registered originally.
[49:38.320 --> 49:42.320]  So I was just wondering if it was a necessity or not, but I do like my privacy.
[49:42.320 --> 49:51.320]  Well, I've talked before about what is potentially the best process for doing that, and it's not actually going through the DMV.
[49:51.320 --> 50:01.320]  It's going to the Secretary of State and informing them in writing that you intend to remove your car from the jurisdiction of this state.
[50:01.320 --> 50:10.320]  And you need them to do a title search to assure that there is no outstanding liens, loans, or any other claims against the property in question.
[50:10.320 --> 50:19.320]  And once they certify that there is no such claim against the property and that it's currently in the name of whoever it supposedly belongs to,
[50:19.320 --> 50:21.320]  then that's all there is to it at that point.
[50:21.320 --> 50:23.320]  D registration is no longer a big deal.
[50:23.320 --> 50:24.320]  It's not required to DMV.
[50:24.320 --> 50:27.320]  You can just let the registration expire and be done with it.
[50:27.320 --> 50:32.320]  But now the issue here becomes, is can you show proper ownership via a bill of sale?
[50:32.320 --> 50:40.320]  Because the certificate of title is not evidence of ownership except for legal ownership.
[50:40.320 --> 50:44.320]  It is not representative of equity ownership.
[50:44.320 --> 50:52.320]  The reason for that is because your state business and commerce code defines a certificate of title as a negotiable instrument,
[50:52.320 --> 50:54.320]  meaning it's transferable.
[50:54.320 --> 51:02.320]  That's exactly why when people sell a car, the only thing they have to do is sign the back of that certificate of title just like they're endorsing a check
[51:02.320 --> 51:05.320]  and handing it over to someone else to cash or deposit.
[51:05.320 --> 51:13.320]  You're doing exactly the same thing with a certificate of title except what you're exchanging isn't money, it's the car.
[51:13.320 --> 51:17.320]  It works exactly the same way.
[51:17.320 --> 51:24.320]  But possession of the money is the only semblance of ownership you've got, and in this case, the car.
[51:24.320 --> 51:28.320]  But equity ownership is different than legal ownership.
[51:28.320 --> 51:34.320]  Legal ownership only entitles you to possession and use, but not disposition.
[51:34.320 --> 51:44.320]  In other words, under legal ownership, you can have the property in your possession, you can use the property for whatever purpose you want,
[51:44.320 --> 51:49.320]  but you do not have the lawful authority to destroy or transfer the property.
[51:49.320 --> 51:52.320]  And that's not my definition of legal ownership.
[51:52.320 --> 51:58.320]  That is the way the court's determined its meaning in black's law and posted it in black's law.
[51:58.320 --> 52:04.320]  In legal ownership, you can burn it to the ground if you want to, as long as you don't try to commit insurance fraud when you do it.
[52:04.320 --> 52:06.320]  You can sell it to anyone you want to.
[52:06.320 --> 52:14.320]  You can disassemble it and sell the parts if you want to, and there's nothing they can do about it if you have equity ownership.
[52:14.320 --> 52:15.320]  And that's the difference.
[52:15.320 --> 52:19.320]  That's why you can lease a car, but you can't sell it.
[52:19.320 --> 52:27.320]  You can't transfer it to someone else because that certificate of title is operating, in essence, just like a lease.
[52:27.320 --> 52:34.320]  So if I do get it de-registered, I need to get the bill of sale with it as well.
[52:34.320 --> 52:35.320]  Yes.
[52:35.320 --> 52:38.320]  And keep a copy of it with me at all times?
[52:38.320 --> 52:43.320]  I would keep a certified copy in the original somewhere else in safekeeping, absolutely.
[52:43.320 --> 52:47.320]  Okay.
[52:47.320 --> 52:51.320]  Is there any need to get the manufacturers?
[52:51.320 --> 52:52.320]  Nope.
[52:52.320 --> 52:54.320]  No, okay.
[52:54.320 --> 53:03.320]  MSO and MCO, despite the things I used to think about it on the show, I've gone back into it and I've looked at it a lot more heavily and I've talked to people about it.
[53:03.320 --> 53:09.320]  Dave Champion and I have talked about it extensively and the information that he's gotten from it and everything.
[53:09.320 --> 53:20.320]  And generally what it all comes down to is a manufacturer's statement of origin is simply the way that they track the original part numbers for an assembled car.
[53:20.320 --> 53:22.320]  And that's what it's for.
[53:22.320 --> 53:36.320]  It is so that if you want to certify the car as all original, for instance, as a classic or collectible, the MSO is the only way you can verify that all the original part numbers match.
[53:36.320 --> 53:38.320]  That's good to know.
[53:38.320 --> 53:44.320]  Okay, but other than that, it's not in any way something that signifies ownership.
[53:44.320 --> 53:53.320]  Even if you bought the car directly from a dealer, you still want a notarized bill of sale for the car.
[53:53.320 --> 53:57.320]  Okay.
[53:57.320 --> 53:58.320]  Last question.
[53:58.320 --> 54:05.320]  Once it's registered as part of the traffic stop, should I cover the Venn number on the dash?
[54:05.320 --> 54:15.320]  Well, you can do whatever you want, but don't ask me how they're going to react and what they're going to do because that all is isolated to the temperament of the particular officer and his knowledge.
[54:15.320 --> 54:16.320]  No, I know.
[54:16.320 --> 54:21.320]  So that would fall under the protection of a warrantless search, would it not?
[54:21.320 --> 54:29.320]  Again, if they arrest you, then it will be considered a search contingent upon arrest.
[54:29.320 --> 54:36.320]  And if they tow the car, then they'll call it a search contingent upon inventory after an arrest.
[54:36.320 --> 54:44.320]  So there's all kinds of ways that the courts have allowed them to get around the warrant requirement.
[54:44.320 --> 54:48.320]  None of it's right, but they can do it.
[54:48.320 --> 54:50.320]  Okay.
[54:50.320 --> 54:56.320]  So even if you don't have it registered or anything else, my advice to anyone in a car is very simple.
[54:56.320 --> 55:07.320]  Don't be hauling anything illegal in that car that you don't want to get caught with because they can find a way around the warrant.
[55:07.320 --> 55:10.320]  Okay.
[55:10.320 --> 55:13.320]  Steven, what if it's like a warrantless arrest?
[55:13.320 --> 55:14.320]  Can I come back?
[55:14.320 --> 55:24.320]  Again, unless you can first prove that the arrest itself was invalid, then you can't prove that the search contingent upon that arrest is invalid, can you?
[55:24.320 --> 55:26.320]  No, no.
[55:26.320 --> 55:27.320]  Okay.
[55:27.320 --> 55:30.320]  Now I was just kind of prepared for that.
[55:30.320 --> 55:31.320]  Okay.
[55:31.320 --> 55:39.320]  You can always file motions to suppress and all this for anything they may find, but almost guaranteed the trial court at least is not going to grant it.
[55:39.320 --> 55:48.320]  You may have grounds on appeal to get that overturned and force a suppression, but you're still going to have to go through that battle to get there.
[55:48.320 --> 55:53.320]  If you want to avoid that battle up front, then don't have it in the car.
[55:53.320 --> 56:06.320]  Because the moment you're not running plates or anything else, it's a guarantee someone's going to act on that and stop you whether it's legal or not.
[56:06.320 --> 56:07.320]  All right.
[56:07.320 --> 56:08.320]  All right.
[56:08.320 --> 56:09.320]  Well, thank you.
[56:09.320 --> 56:10.320]  I'll let you get to some other callers.
[56:10.320 --> 56:11.320]  Yes, sir.
[56:11.320 --> 56:12.320]  Thanks for calling in.
[56:12.320 --> 56:13.320]  All right.
[56:13.320 --> 56:14.320]  Bye-bye.
[56:14.320 --> 56:15.320]  All right.
[56:15.320 --> 56:17.320]  Now we have John in Texas.
[56:17.320 --> 56:22.320]  John, I'm two and a half minutes from a break so I can give you two minutes and then I'll have to go from there.
[56:22.320 --> 56:23.320]  All right.
[56:23.320 --> 56:29.320]  Hello, John.
[56:29.320 --> 56:33.320]  John.
[56:33.320 --> 56:35.320]  John.
[56:35.320 --> 56:41.320]  I can hear you on the line.
[56:41.320 --> 56:44.320]  Hello, John.
[56:44.320 --> 56:45.320]  Hello.
[56:45.320 --> 56:46.320]  Hi.
[56:46.320 --> 56:47.320]  Thanks for tuning in.
[56:47.320 --> 56:48.320]  What's up?
[56:48.320 --> 56:52.320]  I thought I was calling in just to the listening line.
[56:52.320 --> 56:53.320]  There is no such thing.
[56:53.320 --> 56:56.320]  I went over that at the beginning of the show.
[56:56.320 --> 56:57.320]  Okay.
[56:57.320 --> 57:02.320]  If you want to listen, use your internet connection to do it.
[57:02.320 --> 57:03.320]  Okay.
[57:03.320 --> 57:04.320]  Okay.
[57:04.320 --> 57:06.320]  Just go to the website, click on the listen link.
[57:06.320 --> 57:09.320]  When it pops up and says, what do you want to open this with?
[57:09.320 --> 57:15.320]  Pick whatever media player you have on your phone or on your computer and stream it that way.
[57:15.320 --> 57:17.320]  But yeah, the caller line is not a listener line.
[57:17.320 --> 57:21.320]  We don't actually have a listener line.
[57:21.320 --> 57:22.320]  All right.
[57:22.320 --> 57:23.320]  Well, thanks again.
[57:23.320 --> 57:24.320]  Yes, sir.
[57:24.320 --> 57:25.320]  Sorry.
[57:25.320 --> 57:26.320]  Thanks for calling.
[57:26.320 --> 57:27.320]  Bye-bye.
[57:27.320 --> 57:28.320]  Bye-bye.
[57:28.320 --> 57:29.320]  All right.
[57:29.320 --> 57:34.320]  Now, I've got a minute and 20 seconds so I'm going to wait to take the next caller.
[57:34.320 --> 57:37.320]  So I've got time to talk to them on the other side of the break.
[57:37.320 --> 57:38.320]  Okay.
[57:38.320 --> 57:42.320]  Now, back to what I was talking about before we got into the callers here real quick on
[57:42.320 --> 57:43.320]  the lawsuits.
[57:43.320 --> 57:47.320]  I will do another article on the blog.
[57:47.320 --> 57:50.320]  I haven't posted anything on the blog in a while because I've been so caught up in trying
[57:50.320 --> 57:54.320]  to get this information done that I haven't had time to sit down and just write anything
[57:54.320 --> 57:57.320]  of any real essence to put up there.
[57:57.320 --> 58:02.320]  I'm hoping to get beyond that point here relatively soon where I can take a little bit of time
[58:02.320 --> 58:03.320]  and add to it.
[58:03.320 --> 58:08.320]  But one of the things I am going to post soon is an article that highlights the criminal,
[58:08.320 --> 58:13.320]  the sworn criminal statement we made against this justice of the peace.
[58:13.320 --> 58:17.320]  And the reason that's going to be important is because I'm going to post the actual criminal
[58:17.320 --> 58:21.320]  complaint and a word document that you can download and use against the judges and the
[58:21.320 --> 58:27.320]  courts in these cases because every one of them is doing the same thing and they're doing
[58:27.320 --> 58:28.320]  it wrong.
[58:28.320 --> 58:31.320]  And the way they're doing it is criminal.
[58:31.320 --> 58:35.320]  So we're going to go after them by droves.
[58:35.320 --> 58:36.320]  All right, folks.
[58:36.320 --> 58:38.320]  This is rule of law radio.
[58:38.320 --> 58:40.320]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:40.320 --> 58:43.320]  We will be right back after this break.
[58:43.320 --> 58:50.320]  So y'all hang in there.
[58:50.320 --> 58:54.320]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:54.320 --> 58:58.320]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.320 --> 59:04.320]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.320 --> 59:07.320]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.320 --> 59:09.320]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.320 --> 59:15.320]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:15.320 --> 59:18.320]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.320 --> 59:24.320]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:24.320 --> 59:28.320]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.320 --> 59:33.320]  Bibles from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.320 --> 59:43.320]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.320 --> 59:47.320]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.320 --> 59:50.320]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.320 --> 59:53.320]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[59:53.320 --> 59:56.320]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[59:56.320 --> 59:59.320]  Logos Radio Network
[01:00:26.320 --> 01:00:30.320]  Logos Radio Network
[01:00:57.320 --> 01:01:03.320]  The year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited
[01:01:03.320 --> 01:01:08.320]  private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
[01:01:08.320 --> 01:01:13.320]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:01:13.320 --> 01:01:18.320]  in public schools, and employment, and public accommodations for places of business today
[01:01:18.320 --> 01:01:20.320]  in history.
[01:01:20.320 --> 01:01:27.320]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:01:27.320 --> 01:01:31.320]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured.
[01:01:31.320 --> 01:01:36.320]  An attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
[01:01:36.320 --> 01:01:42.320]  by the United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet.
[01:01:42.320 --> 01:01:48.320]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria,
[01:01:48.320 --> 01:01:52.320]  get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart.
[01:01:52.320 --> 01:01:58.320]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partnered with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it.
[01:01:58.320 --> 01:02:03.320]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack
[01:02:03.320 --> 01:02:06.320]  must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[01:02:06.320 --> 01:02:11.320]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization
[01:02:11.320 --> 01:02:15.320]  for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the sign of the chemical slaughter.
[01:02:15.320 --> 01:02:20.320]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[01:02:20.320 --> 01:02:24.320]  a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels
[01:02:24.320 --> 01:02:27.320]  that are openly being funded by Western governments,
[01:02:27.320 --> 01:02:32.320]  with ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.320 --> 01:02:37.320]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook
[01:02:37.320 --> 01:02:42.320]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government,
[01:02:42.320 --> 01:02:47.320]  which has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike,
[01:02:47.320 --> 01:02:51.320]  and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:51.320 --> 01:03:20.320]  This was Crick Roadie with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:21.320 --> 01:03:31.320]  You can't make a run
[01:03:31.320 --> 01:03:35.320]  because wouldn't, oh, boys, raise, don't shot guns.
[01:03:35.320 --> 01:03:42.320]  We say grace and we say man, if you ain't in the best, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:42.320 --> 01:03:50.320]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky Mountains and the West.
[01:03:50.320 --> 01:03:59.120]  Folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio calling number 5126461984. We still got a few
[01:03:59.120 --> 01:04:04.640]  callers up on the board. Now I made a meme I put up on Facebook, which people seem to be thoroughly
[01:04:04.640 --> 01:04:11.200]  enjoying. I did put it on a post that I sent relating to last Monday night show, which is the
[01:04:11.200 --> 01:04:17.520]  audio link I sent to my cousin who is the licensed peace officer here in Texas. So he could play it
[01:04:17.520 --> 01:04:23.040]  for the deputy that he was having a discussion with over the subject. I'm not sure how he reacted
[01:04:23.040 --> 01:04:28.640]  to the picture. I took a shot of Robin Williams out of Good Morning Vietnam when they're all
[01:04:28.640 --> 01:04:35.440]  sitting around in that meeting with the lieutenant and it basically says, in my defense, sir, I did
[01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:41.680]  not say that all law enforcement officers are stupid because simply because most of them have
[01:04:41.680 --> 01:04:46.880]  an IQ that can be measured in double digits. What I actually said was that it should be a
[01:04:46.880 --> 01:04:53.760]  requirement that the first digit be higher than zero or one. And I'm not sure how that's going
[01:04:53.760 --> 01:05:00.880]  to go over when he sees it, but I guess he'll tell me. So hopefully he'll just give the audio to his
[01:05:00.880 --> 01:05:06.480]  deputy friends so his deputy friend won't take offense at it and we'll listen to it. All right,
[01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:11.920]  that being said, let's get to our next caller, which is James in Texas. James, what can we do for you?
[01:05:11.920 --> 01:05:16.480]  Well, I apologize. I think I hung up on you earlier.
[01:05:17.360 --> 01:05:21.600]  Well, I don't know if you hung up or got dropped. I was definitely calling out for you,
[01:05:21.600 --> 01:05:28.480]  but I'm glad you made it back. I think I hung up on you. I appreciate you, you know, I contacted
[01:05:28.480 --> 01:05:36.640]  you on towel law about my experience on my first appearance with the judge that I'm the
[01:05:36.640 --> 01:05:42.800]  access to court and the court clerk too. The court clerk had no clue when I had, you know,
[01:05:42.800 --> 01:05:49.520]  gave her a motion. I had three motions to enter and looked at me like I had three heads.
[01:05:50.160 --> 01:05:57.440]  You know, apparently they've never had anyone by their traffic citation in Angelina County at
[01:05:57.440 --> 01:06:07.200]  J.P. Justice Court precinct code. Well, that's not correct. I have. Well, I've also fought the city
[01:06:07.200 --> 01:06:14.000]  of Lufkin over there. Yeah, well, I know that, but this may be a court clerk that wasn't there
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:20.400]  like when you did it. I don't know. Yeah. But you know, she told me, she said, I've never seen
[01:06:20.400 --> 01:06:26.800]  anything like this. Normally what happens is you enter a plea and you talk to the county attorney
[01:06:26.800 --> 01:06:33.840]  and I said, no, no, I'm not here to enter a plea. I can't since I've never been given proper notice.
[01:06:34.560 --> 01:06:40.080]  You know, I'm just here to enter these motions into the into the record. And she said, well,
[01:06:40.080 --> 01:06:44.800]  I just don't know what to do. I said, well, the judge and the prosecutor should understand it.
[01:06:45.840 --> 01:06:51.040]  And it just, this went on for five minutes, maybe, and she finally got the judge out of
[01:06:51.040 --> 01:06:56.640]  out of a meeting. I think it was meeting with one of the county commissioners. I could hear
[01:06:56.640 --> 01:07:04.320]  part of their conversation. He's a little video banny rooster. Yeah. I was doing, he come out
[01:07:04.320 --> 01:07:08.560]  asking, you know, can I help you? And I explained to him what I was trying to do.
[01:07:10.400 --> 01:07:16.640]  And he just, he looked at me like I had three heads. I'm going, gotta be kidding me.
[01:07:16.640 --> 01:07:22.400]  And he told me, he said, look, I don't, I don't see people on traffic citation,
[01:07:23.840 --> 01:07:31.360]  which to me is a tacit admission that he's delegated as a 30 authority to the court clerk.
[01:07:31.360 --> 01:07:36.080]  Well, did you ask him specifically what he meant by he does not see people?
[01:07:37.120 --> 01:07:41.600]  No, I did not. That would have been good. Remember, when they say something
[01:07:41.600 --> 01:07:47.760]  like that, you always need to clarify what they mean just for future reference. Always get
[01:07:47.760 --> 01:07:54.240]  clarification. Judge, are you saying that you don't grant trials to people for traffic tickets?
[01:07:54.240 --> 01:07:58.480]  Or are you saying that you refuse to deal with people because of traffic tickets? Can
[01:07:58.480 --> 01:08:01.600]  you please help me out here and help me understand what you meant by I don't see?
[01:08:01.600 --> 01:08:11.040]  Well, and I think later, I may have helped myself. He started explaining the same thing
[01:08:11.040 --> 01:08:16.880]  the court clerk did that, you know, you see the county attorney and I said, no, sir,
[01:08:16.880 --> 01:08:22.160]  my first appearance is supposed to be before a magistrate or probably will cause contamination.
[01:08:22.160 --> 01:08:31.040]  And he just started shaking his head. Like, you know, I think he finally told me he said,
[01:08:31.840 --> 01:08:37.200]  well, I'm not an attorney and you aren't either. He said, why don't you just hire an attorney?
[01:08:37.200 --> 01:08:47.360]  And I said, no, that's not going to happen. And he finally said, well, I will take your
[01:08:47.360 --> 01:08:54.800]  motion under consideration and I will forward it to the county attorney. I said, that's not the
[01:08:54.800 --> 01:09:03.280]  same thing as entering into the court record. And he just again reiterated he would take it in
[01:09:03.280 --> 01:09:08.000]  under consideration forwarded to the county attorney. I said, well, actually, I have two more
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:13.760]  motions. Would you like a copy of each of those? He said, sure, I'll take them under consideration
[01:09:13.760 --> 01:09:21.360]  forwarded to the county attorney. Okay. Well, so I asked him, I said, well, I need to get my copy
[01:09:21.360 --> 01:09:27.520]  stamped by the court showing that I appeared on my promise to appear. And he said, we're not going
[01:09:27.520 --> 01:09:34.880]  to stamp anything for you. And at that point, I just said, okay, y'all have a nice day.
[01:09:35.680 --> 01:09:42.640]  Did you record this? Yes, sir. Okay, here's the first thing you need to do. Go to the county
[01:09:42.640 --> 01:09:50.000]  commissioners, file a complaint against that JP, file a judicial conduct complaint against that JP,
[01:09:50.640 --> 01:09:56.640]  file a Supreme Court complaint against that JP, and include copies of that recording with each
[01:09:56.640 --> 01:10:03.280]  of them. Then turn around and go to the county attorney's office and file a criminal complaint
[01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:08.720]  for denying of access to the courts, which means abuse of official capacity and official
[01:10:08.720 --> 01:10:13.600]  oppression on the part of the judge. Got you. I've already got those. As a matter of fact,
[01:10:14.480 --> 01:10:20.240]  I've been looking at that today, and I will type it up tomorrow. Well, if you're on my Facebook
[01:10:20.240 --> 01:10:26.160]  group, there should be a document for the criminal complaint that has all those charges already in
[01:10:26.160 --> 01:10:33.040]  it, a sworn criminal statement that I posted in the group. You posted that after I sent you my
[01:10:33.040 --> 01:10:37.360]  scenario about what happened. You posted it. Yeah, you can actually use that as a template,
[01:10:37.360 --> 01:10:43.680]  because those charges are already in there. I've already got it downloaded to my flash drive,
[01:10:43.680 --> 01:10:49.040]  and I've read through it all today. I just didn't type that up today. I was typing up a
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:57.920]  public information request to open to the county sheriff's department for all the videos and
[01:10:57.920 --> 01:11:05.120]  records and I forget what the other one was, but I also typed up a demand for access to the public
[01:11:05.120 --> 01:11:10.400]  court records today. I'm going to take that in tomorrow morning and hand it to them. Of course,
[01:11:10.400 --> 01:11:16.480]  you've got all the statutes that will be violating if they deny me access again.
[01:11:18.640 --> 01:11:25.920]  I guess if they deny me again, I can file two counts of each of those charges against them.
[01:11:25.920 --> 01:11:29.600]  Absolutely. That's what I was calling them to verify today.
[01:11:29.600 --> 01:11:41.520]  I'm sure I'll have other questions later on. Like I said, I've typed up another motion to
[01:11:41.520 --> 01:11:49.280]  dismiss today based on 708.105, and I will turn that in Wednesday. I'm not going to turn it in
[01:11:49.280 --> 01:11:54.480]  tomorrow. I'm going to go back and reread it today. That's what I was telling you. Most of the
[01:11:54.480 --> 01:12:03.440]  citations issued in the state do not comply with 601.053 or 708.105. 608.053.
[01:12:05.280 --> 01:12:12.160]  I couldn't remember which one that was. I had 601 on my phone. 601.053.
[01:12:18.160 --> 01:12:22.480]  When I called you last week, I've got a call recorder on my phone, but it doesn't record
[01:12:22.480 --> 01:12:28.400]  you're in, so I couldn't get what you said. I don't know why. That would be the app I use
[01:12:28.400 --> 01:12:36.080]  records both sides. Well, this one did for some reason. The day after I made my initial
[01:12:36.080 --> 01:12:41.680]  appearance, which was last Thursday, I got another ticket Friday before the same judge.
[01:12:43.120 --> 01:12:49.520]  Of course, this one was DPS, and it is compliant with 708.105,
[01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:56.080]  but he actually listed, he asked me to charge me for two things, failure, the display driver's
[01:12:56.080 --> 01:13:02.400]  license. Here's an element that they've got to cite in the complaint, which I guarantee
[01:13:02.400 --> 01:13:07.840]  you they will not. I've got the court case that says they have to do it too, but if they're going
[01:13:07.840 --> 01:13:12.720]  to charge you a failure to display a license, they have to prove in court that you were actually
[01:13:12.720 --> 01:13:18.560]  issued a license. They have to assert it in the complaint, and they have to prove that you didn't,
[01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:28.240]  that you had a license, but didn't show it. Okay. Yeah. Well, when you go in and read 521.025A,
[01:13:28.240 --> 01:13:35.920]  it talks about a person required to have a license. Yeah, exactly. Okay. And that's exactly why they
[01:13:35.920 --> 01:13:43.360]  have to show that you were issued one. Okay. But where would I find that definition of person?
[01:13:43.360 --> 01:13:53.440]  Is that in the government case? 541. Which is in 541. Yep. Okay. Okay. I looked through it
[01:13:53.440 --> 01:13:58.080]  some today. Of course, I was at work, and I didn't have time. But you're going to find that it shows
[01:13:58.080 --> 01:14:03.120]  individual or natural person listed with legal entities. So you're going to need to go to the
[01:14:03.120 --> 01:14:06.560]  legal blog and look at the Includes and Includes article and make sure you understand how that
[01:14:06.560 --> 01:14:14.720]  works. Exactly. It's an individual, comma, and then all fictional entities. Correct. Which I
[01:14:14.720 --> 01:14:21.600]  understand means individual can only mean an individual, one of those fictional entities,
[01:14:21.600 --> 01:14:28.000]  or an eighth of living, breathing man or woman acting as an agent for one of those fictional
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:34.320]  legal entities. Well, it's not individual as in one of those things. It is a living, breathing
[01:14:34.320 --> 01:14:40.000]  individual acting as an agent on behalf or for the benefit of one of those things.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:48.160]  Correct. Okay. So, well, I was 50% right. Yes. 50% wrong. Okay. Got you. But on the speeding
[01:14:48.160 --> 01:14:56.240]  chart, you actually listed 545.351 and 352. Right. And they have to prove collision. They
[01:14:56.240 --> 01:15:01.120]  have to both assert and prove collision, which they can't do. Correct. And there's a motion for
[01:15:01.120 --> 01:15:08.720]  that up there as well. And I found that one also. But I haven't even started looking at this one yet.
[01:15:08.720 --> 01:15:18.240]  But to me, it's very telling that they conveniently leave out 201.904. Oh, absolutely.
[01:15:19.440 --> 01:15:26.240]  But we don't. Yeah. But they do. So, you know, and I'm sitting there looking at this
[01:15:26.240 --> 01:15:32.720]  reading this citation, I go, well, he listed those two, but he left that one out. I wonder why.
[01:15:33.760 --> 01:15:39.760]  Well, because there's no offense under that. There's no offense under 352 either.
[01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:49.440]  Actually, there is no offense under any of them. There is no such thing in Texas law as a speeding
[01:15:49.440 --> 01:15:56.000]  offense. Nowhere will you find the word offense in association with speeding or speed limits,
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:00.640]  or speed signs. You know what? You know what? I've heard you say that in the past,
[01:16:00.640 --> 01:16:05.600]  but I didn't catch that. Yeah. You will not find the word offense and you will not find the word
[01:16:05.600 --> 01:16:18.240]  misdemeanor. There is absolute and 1.03 of the Texas Penal Code says very clearly,
[01:16:18.240 --> 01:16:24.640]  a regulatory statute cannot allege a crime that the statute itself does not specifically state
[01:16:24.640 --> 01:16:31.200]  is an offense. And there is none for speeding. Absolutely none.
[01:16:32.320 --> 01:16:37.200]  And what was that on the Penal Code? 1.03 of the Penal Code.
[01:16:38.480 --> 01:16:48.000]  Okay. Got it. Okay. All right. I'm gonna let you go. If you've never called me to get your boot
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:56.800]  down, so I'm eating it. All right, James. All right. Thanks, James. All right, folks. Y'all hang
[01:16:56.800 --> 01:17:08.880]  on. We'll be right back. It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway
[01:17:08.880 --> 01:17:15.200]  sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.200 --> 01:17:21.920]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for
[01:17:21.920 --> 01:17:29.040]  grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase
[01:17:29.040 --> 01:17:35.600]  Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic
[01:17:35.600 --> 01:17:43.200]  seminar and get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've
[01:17:43.200 --> 01:17:48.560]  enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the
[01:17:48.560 --> 01:17:54.480]  best quality programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.040 --> 01:17:58.960]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.480 --> 01:18:05.360]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so
[01:18:05.360 --> 01:18:10.000]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fit. I'd be lost without
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:15.280]  logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[01:18:15.280 --> 01:18:19.840]  but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on
[01:18:19.840 --> 01:18:26.160]  supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon,
[01:18:26.160 --> 01:18:31.200]  you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:38.640]  cookies. Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you
[01:18:38.640 --> 01:18:45.360]  order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do
[01:18:45.360 --> 01:18:51.200]  you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes.
[01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:57.200]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:19:10.800]  We are Logos. Happy holidays, Logos. This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.800 --> 01:19:29.360]  As I walk through the body of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize it's a step
[01:19:29.360 --> 01:19:35.280]  because I've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone. But
[01:19:35.280 --> 01:19:41.040]  I ain't never cross a man that didn't deserve it. You be treated like a punk. You know that's unheard
[01:19:41.040 --> 01:19:46.080]  of. You better watch how you're talking and where you're walking. Or you and your homies might be
[01:19:46.080 --> 01:19:51.840]  lying to each other. I really hate the trip, but I got a look. As they close, I see my film within
[01:19:51.840 --> 01:19:57.120]  the pistol smoke pool. I'm the kind of tree that little homies want to be like. All my needs in
[01:19:57.120 --> 01:20:09.120]  the night is 10 prayers in the street lights. All right folks, we are back. This is Rule of
[01:20:09.120 --> 01:20:17.840]  Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. All right. Now, down to our next caller,
[01:20:17.840 --> 01:20:24.560]  which is Lenny in Arizona. Lenny, what can we do for you? Hey, Eddie. Thanks for taking my call,
[01:20:24.560 --> 01:20:31.600]  man. Yes, sir. I do the best I can with what I got. I'm going to be kind of off topic of traffic,
[01:20:31.600 --> 01:20:39.440]  and I have a neighbor that's having a problem with the county. The county is charging her in a
[01:20:39.440 --> 01:20:45.680]  civil suit with failure to comply with codes, and they put like $48,000 or the fines on her.
[01:20:45.680 --> 01:20:51.120]  Well, more than the value of the property. They've threatened to condemn it and bulldoze it. They've
[01:20:51.120 --> 01:20:57.200]  said that she is a nuisance per se. They said she's a health hazard, the property is.
[01:20:58.800 --> 01:21:04.160]  None of which they have any actual evidence of, right? Well, you know, what's funny is I have
[01:21:04.160 --> 01:21:09.440]  one question to ask about the complaint. The complaint lists the county, a body corporate
[01:21:09.440 --> 01:21:15.600]  and politic, and the county board of supervisors, not by name, just by that title. Right. But none
[01:21:15.600 --> 01:21:22.560]  of those entities signed the complaint. Now, can a county inspector sign the complaint as an agent
[01:21:22.560 --> 01:21:28.720]  on behalf of the county in something like that, or would that just be an insufficient complaint?
[01:21:30.880 --> 01:21:33.760]  Well, the first thing is, who's claiming to be injured?
[01:21:35.600 --> 01:21:40.000]  Nobody. They're not listing any injuries. Right. They're simply saying it's a code violation,
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:45.840]  when in which case they're trying to claim the code is injured. But the thing about it is, is in Arizona,
[01:21:47.200 --> 01:21:52.400]  I'm sorry? They're claiming that she had somehow had a duty to abide by these codes,
[01:21:52.960 --> 01:21:58.800]  which have no enactment clause. Right. They're a complete violation of the state constitution
[01:21:58.800 --> 01:22:04.560]  as binding public law. Right. How do I get that across to them? I mean, they just throw,
[01:22:04.560 --> 01:22:08.960]  they look at the... Well, under the legislative section of the Arizona Constitution, who is
[01:22:08.960 --> 01:22:15.840]  authorized to make law? The Arizona legislature and nobody else. Is there any power in that,
[01:22:15.840 --> 01:22:23.840]  in any part of the legislative department or title of the Constitution that allows them to
[01:22:23.840 --> 01:22:29.760]  delegate that power to a political subdivision, or that directly authorizes such power to a
[01:22:29.760 --> 01:22:36.400]  political subdivision? You know, I'm unclear on that. There's... What do you mean, unclear?
[01:22:36.400 --> 01:22:44.160]  So, well, they delegate authority to the county to handle regulatory stuff that...
[01:22:44.160 --> 01:22:50.640]  Yeah, but the question is, is who can the county regulate with their rules and regulations,
[01:22:50.640 --> 01:22:56.480]  as far as it having enforcement power? See, there's the caveat that makes that the problem.
[01:22:57.040 --> 01:23:04.640]  The county has given power over its own stuff and its own people, but they cannot use that power
[01:23:04.640 --> 01:23:09.280]  against the general public, at least the unincorporated general public, and private property.
[01:23:10.480 --> 01:23:17.440]  Because it is not legislation enacted by the legislature. It is not authorized by the Constitution,
[01:23:17.440 --> 01:23:22.400]  and the people cannot be bound by anything that is not enacted by the legislature.
[01:23:24.240 --> 01:23:29.600]  Now, how can I assert that on paper? Well, the first thing you need to do is search the statutes
[01:23:29.600 --> 01:23:36.320]  for a definition of the term law. The way you do that is you do a search inside of double quotes
[01:23:36.320 --> 01:23:45.600]  that says law means, or law includes. What you're likely to find is you're going to find the definition
[01:23:45.600 --> 01:23:52.960]  of the term law, where they have added things that the legislature did not enact, such as ordinances,
[01:23:52.960 --> 01:23:59.680]  for instance, to the meaning of the term. That statute would be fought as being unconstitutional
[01:23:59.680 --> 01:24:08.480]  on its face, because it is authorizing by statutory fiat and mere definition the delegation
[01:24:08.480 --> 01:24:15.840]  of an authority that the state constitution itself forbids. Because there is tons of case
[01:24:15.840 --> 01:24:25.200]  law that a delegated power cannot be redelegated. This lady got all the way to a summary judgment,
[01:24:25.200 --> 01:24:31.040]  and they ruled against her, because she's totally, she's aged, never been to court before,
[01:24:31.040 --> 01:24:34.560]  knows nothing about it, and I'm not sure she has the capacity to know about it.
[01:24:34.560 --> 01:24:41.600]  And they count on that too. They gave her a summary judgment, and I drew up a document to help her,
[01:24:41.600 --> 01:24:45.840]  and it was a motion for relief from judgment, from summary judgment.
[01:24:47.280 --> 01:24:52.080]  When you say they got a judgment against her, what kind of court does she go into?
[01:24:53.440 --> 01:24:59.760]  The county superior court, but I don't know how to tell if the judge was acting administratively or
[01:25:00.400 --> 01:25:06.960]  Because the statute, if the judge is acting in some capacity under law, then the law has to say
[01:25:06.960 --> 01:25:13.600]  what that capacity is. In other words, what kind of action was this intended to be? Was it
[01:25:13.600 --> 01:25:19.520]  intended to be administrative, in which case he's acting solely as an administrative officer,
[01:25:19.520 --> 01:25:25.200]  with no immunity, no nothing, and no judicial authority, which means it was not a judicial
[01:25:25.200 --> 01:25:31.680]  decision, which means it's unconstitutional on its face under the takings clause, because she was
[01:25:31.680 --> 01:25:40.160]  not given proper judicial hearing. So you've got to find out. That's imperative to know.
[01:25:41.760 --> 01:25:48.400]  Okay, so all of the charges were only codes and regulations. There were no
[01:25:48.400 --> 01:25:54.480]  Right, which would make them entirely administrative under almost anything with any sense. But this
[01:25:54.480 --> 01:25:59.440]  is not about making sense. This is about making money through theft and legalized robbery.
[01:25:59.440 --> 01:26:04.480]  So what do I have to do to determine whether he's administrative?
[01:26:04.480 --> 01:26:09.760]  You've got to read the statutes. What does the statute say the type of action is required to
[01:26:09.760 --> 01:26:16.160]  be in relation to the actions they took against her? There has to be a law that backs up the
[01:26:16.160 --> 01:26:21.360]  actions that the court took and that the county took. There has to be. Can't just be their own
[01:26:21.360 --> 01:26:26.480]  regulations because if it is, then it's 100% administrative and it's illegal on its face.
[01:26:26.480 --> 01:26:34.400]  Okay, so if they acted in a state court, then there has to be a state law that says what that
[01:26:34.400 --> 01:26:41.280]  action has to be considered as and treated as. And under what authority the judge of that court
[01:26:41.280 --> 01:26:48.720]  is acting, whether it's judicial or non-judicial. But you've got to know that if you can't determine
[01:26:48.720 --> 01:26:52.640]  that, then you can't determine the nature of the action. If you can't determine the nature,
[01:26:52.640 --> 01:26:58.560]  then you've got a rights deprivation because no one's telling you. And you have a right to know
[01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:04.400]  that. Would a request or a motion to request that information from the judge be effective?
[01:27:05.200 --> 01:27:09.200]  The case is over. There's no motion to be filed with the judge.
[01:27:09.200 --> 01:27:14.640]  A motion's only good in a case. There is no case. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Now it's not over.
[01:27:15.680 --> 01:27:18.000]  Well, you said they got a summary judgment against her.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:25.680]  Right. Are you appealing it? Yes. She went to a motion for relief from
[01:27:25.680 --> 01:27:30.800]  summary judgment and she got there so late she didn't file the document that I handed her.
[01:27:30.800 --> 01:27:34.640]  And she went in and tried to argue it herself. And the judge basically told her to sit down
[01:27:34.640 --> 01:27:39.360]  and shut up. He didn't have time to listen to her argument. And then she went out and filed
[01:27:39.360 --> 01:27:45.280]  that document. And then a couple of days later, she filed her appeal. And that took the jurisdiction
[01:27:45.280 --> 01:27:51.600]  away from the Superior Court. And the appellate court looked at that document that had been filed
[01:27:51.600 --> 01:27:59.040]  and gave her in order to file a motion that the Superior Court take on the jurisdiction again
[01:27:59.040 --> 01:28:06.480]  and rule upon that document that we filed. And according to Rule 56B, it's saying that there's
[01:28:06.480 --> 01:28:11.600]  no more things to be dealt with that he finished it. And that he's got to do that. And she's got
[01:28:11.600 --> 01:28:23.120]  to get that in by the 5th of July. Okay. Then do that. Then yeah, if it's been sent back and they
[01:28:23.120 --> 01:28:29.200]  have been ordered to resume jurisdiction and continue the case, then yeah, file a motion
[01:28:29.200 --> 01:28:39.840]  demanding nature and cause. And don't leave it up to them to tell you, provide them with a question.
[01:28:39.840 --> 01:28:44.160]  Is this actually considered administrative? Is this actually considered civil? Is this
[01:28:44.160 --> 01:28:53.840]  actually considered criminal? Pick one and tell me. That administrative is a form of civil,
[01:28:53.840 --> 01:29:00.080]  but it doesn't have to do process protections. So be aware of that. If they try to say, well,
[01:29:00.080 --> 01:29:10.080]  civil and administrative are the same thing. No, they are not. Okay. So I got to get that motion
[01:29:10.080 --> 01:29:14.560]  separate from the motion she's doing according to the order from the... It depends on what
[01:29:14.560 --> 01:29:19.680]  they're telling her that motion is for. You might can do both, but I would do it separate anyway
[01:29:19.680 --> 01:29:25.200]  to make sure that they take notice of the two different issues. They proceeded without providing
[01:29:25.200 --> 01:29:30.960]  nature and cause, even though that was originally requested. But since you didn't do it in writing
[01:29:30.960 --> 01:29:36.640]  until now, you're going to have a hard time proving it was requested earlier. Well, yeah,
[01:29:36.640 --> 01:29:43.840]  that's true. The motion for relief from judgment brought up the issue that there's no signatures
[01:29:43.840 --> 01:29:50.400]  on the complaint by any of the listed plaintiffs. There's no damages asked for it or... Yeah.
[01:29:50.400 --> 01:29:53.760]  Well, hang on, Lenny. Let me get this break out of the way and we'll pick back up. Okay.
[01:29:53.760 --> 01:29:56.720]  All right, folks. Y'all hang in there. We'll be right back after this break.
[01:30:02.240 --> 01:30:07.920]  In Wisconsin, an elderly woman who housed orphans was about to lose her home to foreclosure
[01:30:07.920 --> 01:30:12.960]  when her 12-year-old grandson came to the rescue. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, back with
[01:30:12.960 --> 01:30:19.520]  the story of Noah the Dreamcatcher after this. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data
[01:30:19.520 --> 01:30:24.560]  about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your
[01:30:24.560 --> 01:30:30.400]  freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep
[01:30:30.400 --> 01:30:36.480]  your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by
[01:30:36.480 --> 01:30:43.840]  StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:43.840 --> 01:30:51.760]  For years, Janice Sparhawk cared for dozens of orphans. Many dropped on her doorstep after dark,
[01:30:51.760 --> 01:30:57.520]  but at 72, she was in trouble. Her health failing, she couldn't pay the mortgage unless she found
[01:30:57.520 --> 01:31:03.440]  $10,000 the bank would foreclose. She appealed to her congressman, her governor, and even the
[01:31:03.440 --> 01:31:08.720]  president, but it was her grandson, Noah, who saved the day. The 12-year-old posted her story
[01:31:08.720 --> 01:31:14.080]  on a website he'd created three years earlier, Noah's Dreamcatcher network, to help hurricane
[01:31:14.080 --> 01:31:19.600]  victims. Within days, enough money had poured in to rescue Sparhawk, her foster kids,
[01:31:19.600 --> 01:31:25.040]  and their faith in America. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most
[01:31:25.040 --> 01:31:35.920]  private search engine. I lost my son. My nephew. My uncle. My son. On September 11, 2000. Most
[01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:41.600]  people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story
[01:31:41.600 --> 01:31:46.560]  skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that fire brought down
[01:31:46.560 --> 01:31:51.840]  building 7. Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there
[01:31:51.840 --> 01:31:58.400]  is more to the story. Bring justice to my son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:58.400 --> 01:32:03.040]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[01:32:03.040 --> 01:32:06.960]  Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on,
[01:32:06.960 --> 01:32:11.120]  we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for
[01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:15.280]  it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you
[01:32:15.280 --> 01:32:20.080]  have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no
[01:32:20.080 --> 01:32:24.800]  out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year, A-plus member of the Better
[01:32:24.800 --> 01:32:29.440]  Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle
[01:32:29.440 --> 01:32:37.600]  your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhome
[01:32:37.600 --> 01:32:42.560]  improvements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100
[01:32:42.560 --> 01:32:47.040]  to the Logos radio network to help continue this programming. So if those out-of-town
[01:32:47.040 --> 01:32:55.680]  roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhome
[01:32:55.680 --> 01:32:59.920]  improvements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be
[01:32:59.920 --> 01:33:29.760]  kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:29.920 --> 01:33:49.760]  That's the way you do it. You play the guitar on the MTV. That ain't working. That's the
[01:33:49.760 --> 01:34:04.000]  way you do it. Money for nothing. Let me choose free. Now that ain't working. That's the way
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:13.200]  you do it. Let me tell you, damn guys ain't dumb. Maybe get up the door on your little
[01:34:13.200 --> 01:34:14.200]  finger. Maybe get up the door on your thumb. We got the ring on my finger.
[01:34:14.200 --> 01:34:15.700]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got a half an hour left in
[01:34:15.700 --> 01:34:18.800]  the show and several callers on the board, so I'm going to see what I can do with what
[01:34:18.800 --> 01:34:20.800]  I got at the moment. All right, ladies, please continue.
[01:34:20.800 --> 01:34:29.400]  Okay. They took a bunch of photo surveillance pictures without a warrant standing outside
[01:34:29.400 --> 01:34:33.720]  the property and they entered the property with only an administrative warrant after
[01:34:33.720 --> 01:34:38.440]  she told them not to come in and they left. They showed up with a bunch of cops with rifles
[01:34:38.440 --> 01:34:43.200]  in their hands trying to serve this administrative warrant. And when she told them to get off
[01:34:43.200 --> 01:34:49.520]  the property, they did. Yeah, an administrative warrant has absolutely no probable call statement
[01:34:49.520 --> 01:34:54.160]  and no criminal implication to it, so there can't be probable cause. They can't enter
[01:34:54.160 --> 01:34:59.320]  with an administrative warrant unless you're an administrative entity like a corporation
[01:34:59.320 --> 01:35:04.360]  or something. They know that. They did later. They did later by coming back when she wasn't
[01:35:04.360 --> 01:35:09.400]  home and they took photos and entered them into evidence. And I complained that they
[01:35:09.400 --> 01:35:13.560]  were collected illegally and they are a fruit of the poison tree and not admissible. Well,
[01:35:13.560 --> 01:35:20.080]  they can use anything that they took pictures of outside of her fence line from the road
[01:35:20.080 --> 01:35:24.920]  or anything like that. But as far as private property, you know what the Supreme Court just
[01:35:24.920 --> 01:35:32.920]  ruled on that. Unless her gate was closed and or locked before they entered the property,
[01:35:32.920 --> 01:35:39.920]  and she's not going to be able to argue trespass or anything else. Okay. And I also put in
[01:35:39.920 --> 01:35:43.440]  that she's not a person that's defined three different times in three different places
[01:35:43.440 --> 01:35:49.600]  in the administrative county code, the county administrative rules and regulations. Yeah.
[01:35:49.600 --> 01:35:53.840]  And they're all the same as they are in that block that you wrote about. All being legal
[01:35:53.840 --> 01:35:59.800]  entities. Except for the one in the beginning, which is an agent. Right. And so she sent
[01:35:59.800 --> 01:36:04.880]  in an affidavit that said that she was not a person has defined in, you know, number
[01:36:04.880 --> 01:36:13.080]  da da da, number da da da. And that was all just repudiated by her, refuted by the county
[01:36:13.080 --> 01:36:19.320]  attorney by saying, well, yes, she is. They can offer any, any sites or any proof. They
[01:36:19.320 --> 01:36:24.160]  just said his responses put, I think I put the county attorney back on his heels because
[01:36:24.160 --> 01:36:30.640]  his responses were all basically no. Yeah. His, his responses were entirely his opinion
[01:36:30.640 --> 01:36:35.300]  and legal conclusions, which he can't offer up as evidence of anything. And he is well
[01:36:35.300 --> 01:36:39.800]  aware of that. And if he, if he isn't, he'd have sure shouldn't be sitting in an elected
[01:36:39.800 --> 01:36:51.280]  job doing what he's doing. Um, the, the county codes and the, uh, and the, uh, statutes
[01:36:51.280 --> 01:36:58.000]  that they're citing, they don't have enactment clauses, but the laws behind them may. Well,
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:03.400]  the statutes will have them in the laws behind them, but their ordinances won't because the
[01:37:03.400 --> 01:37:10.880]  legislature didn't enact them. So with no, and all these things are ordinances with,
[01:37:10.880 --> 01:37:15.680]  with no enactment clause, there's no law and no duty to put on anybody. Right. Okay. If,
[01:37:15.680 --> 01:37:20.280]  if you go, if you haven't seen them, I've got a ton of articles on ordinances on my
[01:37:20.280 --> 01:37:27.400]  blog. Yeah. Last time I typed that in, I got one over and over again. No, no, there's
[01:37:27.400 --> 01:37:35.120]  at least five. There's at least five. Okay. I'll have to search. That's the only one
[01:37:35.120 --> 01:37:40.640]  that we've actually done an administrative hearing on, but there's at least five articles
[01:37:40.640 --> 01:37:45.720]  up there dealing with ordinances, if not more. All you should have to do is type in
[01:37:45.720 --> 01:37:52.720]  ordinance in the search field. Okay. But go to the blog and use the search field there,
[01:37:52.720 --> 01:37:57.920]  not Google. There's a term that I just ran into and I'm not sure if it's pertinent for
[01:37:57.920 --> 01:38:02.200]  what I'm doing that it's called piercing the corporate veil. Are you familiar with that?
[01:38:02.200 --> 01:38:07.720]  Yeah. But piercing the corporate veil is being able to go after someone acting on behalf
[01:38:07.720 --> 01:38:14.040]  of the corporation for their acts. That's what Pierce and making them directly and personally
[01:38:14.040 --> 01:38:18.760]  responsible for the corporation's actions because they were the ones who instigated
[01:38:18.760 --> 01:38:24.360]  them or carried them out and they were in violation of law. Such as the guy that signed
[01:38:24.360 --> 01:38:30.320]  the complaint on behalf of the county. Well, that's not necessarily true. Criminal complaints
[01:38:30.320 --> 01:38:36.600]  do not necessarily have to be signed by the person making the allegation directly. Complaints
[01:38:36.600 --> 01:38:42.760]  can be hearsay, which is why they're not valid charging instruments. And the state of Texas
[01:38:42.760 --> 01:38:48.200]  uses them in class C's for that all the time and it's just not right. It's not due process
[01:38:48.200 --> 01:38:53.080]  because the person making the hearsay complaint has no firsthand knowledge of what they're
[01:38:53.080 --> 01:38:58.840]  saying and they're not allowed to testify to anything asserted in it and yet they're
[01:38:58.840 --> 01:39:05.920]  going to trial based solely on what's in that complaint. And that's not right because there's
[01:39:05.920 --> 01:39:12.400]  no probable cause attached to a hearsay instrument. All of these charges are his opinion, the
[01:39:12.400 --> 01:39:14.400]  inspector. Exactly.
[01:39:14.400 --> 01:39:20.080]  He's put down what are your opinion and signed it. These are all true according to the best
[01:39:20.080 --> 01:39:26.440]  of my knowledge and belief. Yeah, which is sufficient for a complaint, but not to prove
[01:39:26.440 --> 01:39:34.280]  a case. And the thing is, is if he's actually citing his opinion of the law, then you can
[01:39:34.280 --> 01:39:41.480]  challenge him on the stand and that regard. Are you qualified to offer an expert opinion
[01:39:41.480 --> 01:39:46.240]  on the law? And he's going to have to say, well, no. And so is the prosecutor in the
[01:39:46.240 --> 01:39:52.680]  court. Well, no, he's not. Well, then how can he testify that this is true? It's all his
[01:39:52.680 --> 01:39:58.160]  opinion and his conclusions and his presumptions of law, which you just said he can't testify
[01:39:58.160 --> 01:40:07.200]  to and are inadmissible hearsay because he's not qualified. So his testimony is worthless.
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:18.040]  Why are we here? Okay. Lots of good ammo. Thank you. Well, you're welcome. But the blog
[01:40:18.040 --> 01:40:23.440]  will give you a whole lot more on how to use your constitution and the law itself in relation
[01:40:23.440 --> 01:40:31.920]  to ordinances. Okay. And in this instance, making the defendant a cross plaintiff by making
[01:40:31.920 --> 01:40:37.180]  some kind of a charge, how important is that at this stage? I'm not understanding what
[01:40:37.180 --> 01:40:41.480]  you mean defended into a cross plaintiff. You're talking about her making an allegation
[01:40:41.480 --> 01:40:47.360]  against them for their actions? Yeah. And that way she can ask... If this is civil
[01:40:47.360 --> 01:40:52.800]  or administrative, you most certainly can file cross complaints. Would that give her
[01:40:52.800 --> 01:40:57.200]  any advantage at this stage? As long as she can prove what she's claiming, it may give
[01:40:57.200 --> 01:41:03.920]  her an absolute advantage, especially as her claim is that they acted illegally and they're
[01:41:03.920 --> 01:41:09.840]  using the laws incorrectly and unconstitutionally because that not only proves their case is
[01:41:09.840 --> 01:41:24.120]  dead in the water and that she's right, it proves a lawsuit. Okay. And the unconstitutional
[01:41:24.120 --> 01:41:34.600]  use of those codes. The unconstitutional application of ordinances as binding public law under
[01:41:34.600 --> 01:41:44.520]  color of law and lawful authority. That's all illegal. It's a direct violation of your
[01:41:44.520 --> 01:41:51.480]  own state's constitution. And the legislature cannot circumvent the constitution by creating
[01:41:51.480 --> 01:41:58.480]  a statutory definition that empowers an agency outside of the parameters of that constitution.
[01:41:58.480 --> 01:42:05.880]  Okay. So that kind of allegation would be made as a civil charge in this case and used
[01:42:05.880 --> 01:42:09.880]  as a... It could be made as both. She can file a criminal charge against them and she
[01:42:09.880 --> 01:42:17.000]  can file a civil suit against them for it. In the same court? In the same action? Well,
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:20.800]  no. The criminal complaint is directed at the county or district attorneys or whoever
[01:42:20.800 --> 01:42:25.960]  in your state is required to take criminal complaints and apply them to a grand jury
[01:42:25.960 --> 01:42:31.000]  and a charge against whoever it's made against. That'll be a magistrate, a county attorney,
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:36.600]  a district attorney, someone that's authorized in your state to accept criminal complaints
[01:42:36.600 --> 01:42:42.920]  and administer oaths. So you got to look that up. It'll be in your code of criminal procedure,
[01:42:42.920 --> 01:42:47.720]  whatever that may be, as to who's required to take a criminal complaint and how they
[01:42:47.720 --> 01:42:52.320]  have to go about it and what they have to do with it. Then her civil suit is something
[01:42:52.320 --> 01:42:58.720]  completely separate from the criminal complaint. Now, it may be based upon the facts and circumstances
[01:42:58.720 --> 01:43:03.480]  relating to the criminal complaint, but the civil suit won't mention anything about the
[01:43:03.480 --> 01:43:09.800]  crime other than how it caused her harm. Because that's what the civil suit is all about is
[01:43:09.800 --> 01:43:17.160]  the harm she suffered through these actions by these people. Acting under color of a law
[01:43:17.160 --> 01:43:26.920]  and authority that they didn't actually have. Okay, so the harm and distress suffered. There
[01:43:26.920 --> 01:43:31.080]  could be all kinds of basis for harm. It all depends upon the cause of action as to what
[01:43:31.080 --> 01:43:36.600]  you can claim. So you need to look that up too. The lawsuit, you've got both a state
[01:43:36.600 --> 01:43:41.640]  and a federal lawsuit if you could show civil rights violations as they determine civil
[01:43:41.640 --> 01:43:47.240]  rights anyway. So you might be able to sue them twice for the same stuff at both the
[01:43:47.240 --> 01:43:49.720]  state and the federal level. Who knows?
[01:43:49.720 --> 01:43:54.520]  Well, it'd be nice. This lady is really, really poor. She's out of social security.
[01:43:54.520 --> 01:44:23.520]  All right, hang on, Lenny. I got another break. All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:44:23.520 --> 01:44:28.560]  You know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties
[01:44:28.560 --> 01:44:33.920]  of the same species. Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help
[01:44:33.920 --> 01:44:38.240]  people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to
[01:44:38.240 --> 01:44:45.520]  know about. Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:44:45.520 --> 01:44:54.520]  non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367-888-910-4367 and see what our
[01:44:54.520 --> 01:45:00.520]  powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempusa.org.
[01:45:00.520 --> 01:45:07.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.520 --> 01:45:15.520]  Be affordable, easy to understand for a CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:20.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.520 --> 01:45:26.520]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and
[01:45:26.520 --> 01:45:33.520]  now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[01:45:33.520 --> 01:45:39.520]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.520 --> 01:45:45.520]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[01:45:45.520 --> 01:45:52.520]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.520 --> 01:46:04.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.520 --> 01:46:32.520]  All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. We are now in the last segment
[01:46:32.520 --> 01:46:35.520]  of the show, and I'm going to try to see if I can get all this wrapped up.
[01:46:35.520 --> 01:46:41.520]  All right, Lenny, I know you're trying to get off here when I was going to break, but just FYI,
[01:46:41.520 --> 01:46:46.520]  yeah, look at all that stuff, go through it, and see what you can find out, okay?
[01:46:46.520 --> 01:46:48.520]  Thanks for all the new ammo, Eddie.
[01:46:48.520 --> 01:46:57.520]  Yes, sir, good luck. All right, now, next up, Mauricio. Mauricio, what you got?
[01:46:57.520 --> 01:47:03.520]  Hey, Eddie, just real quick, I've been on a circle for a while, and I didn't know that
[01:47:03.520 --> 01:47:09.520]  you came out with a movie with David. What's the name of that movie?
[01:47:09.520 --> 01:47:17.520]  I completely forget, I don't know. I was not even thinking about the movie.
[01:47:17.520 --> 01:47:21.520]  Okay, well, if it comes to you, just throw it out there. I'll be listening.
[01:47:21.520 --> 01:47:23.520]  Okay, we'll do.
[01:47:23.520 --> 01:47:26.520]  All right, bye-bye.
[01:47:26.520 --> 01:47:31.520]  No, that's not supposed to be reflected on the movie. I just had my mind on so many other things,
[01:47:31.520 --> 01:47:36.520]  and that was not an expected question, so I can't remember what the heck the name of the movie is called,
[01:47:36.520 --> 01:47:39.520]  to tell you the truth.
[01:47:39.520 --> 01:47:49.520]  Oh, it's Grand Scam, Mauricio. Grand Scam is what it is, and you can find it on Amazon movies,
[01:47:49.520 --> 01:47:57.520]  Google, Apple iStore movies, and things like that. There are some places that have it.
[01:47:57.520 --> 01:48:06.520]  Okay, I have a wireless caller, area code 409, but I don't have a name. Are you there?
[01:48:06.520 --> 01:48:07.520]  Hello?
[01:48:07.520 --> 01:48:09.520]  I'm at 409.
[01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:10.520]  Hi.
[01:48:10.520 --> 01:48:12.520]  Hi, who am I talking to?
[01:48:12.520 --> 01:48:14.520]  How's it going? Hey, this is Scott.
[01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:18.520]  Hi, Scott. It's going good so far.
[01:48:18.520 --> 01:48:27.520]  All right. Well, today I went into a motion hearing, and expected that to be on the hearing side of the device.
[01:48:27.520 --> 01:48:37.520]  They've got an immunosupport where I was hearing and free trial, so they called me up there as I had to wait a few minutes
[01:48:37.520 --> 01:48:43.520]  after the 50m console. I got there right at 3. There was a girl standing at the door at 159.
[01:48:43.520 --> 01:48:47.520]  I don't know what the deal was, but they stopped people and waited a few minutes out there,
[01:48:47.520 --> 01:48:51.520]  and finally went in. He called me up to the judge and asked to ask my name,
[01:48:51.520 --> 01:48:57.520]  and the other didn't have me on the list. He said, no, you're on free trial,
[01:48:57.520 --> 01:49:02.520]  and I said, oh, I have a motion hearing, thinking they had made a mistake.
[01:49:02.520 --> 01:49:09.520]  He said, no, that's free trial, and he had a chip on his shoulder, and said it would only take three minutes.
[01:49:09.520 --> 01:49:15.520]  So I signed the clipboard for the free trial people, and I was last one in line.
[01:49:15.520 --> 01:49:18.520]  Last one was there. It took two hours to wait.
[01:49:18.520 --> 01:49:26.520]  So after listening to his bad attitude with a couple of folks,
[01:49:26.520 --> 01:49:34.520]  I went to the library next door for about 40 minutes, and I come back,
[01:49:34.520 --> 01:49:38.520]  and the people that had signed in right after me are walking out for the parking lot.
[01:49:38.520 --> 01:49:45.520]  So I kind of panicked and got in there as fast as I could, and there's still a handful of defendants in the courtroom.
[01:49:45.520 --> 01:49:48.520]  It wasn't just one person. It was not like they were just one person waiting on a ride.
[01:49:48.520 --> 01:49:51.520]  They're obviously still dealing with the court.
[01:49:51.520 --> 01:50:00.520]  And I approached the clerk in the bay up there, and she explains that he had instructed her to issue a warrant for IRS,
[01:50:00.520 --> 01:50:05.520]  and that he had said that, you know, I shouldn't have left.
[01:50:05.520 --> 01:50:08.520]  You know, I warned up. You know, she said that...
[01:50:08.520 --> 01:50:13.520]  Who instructed her to write up a warrant?
[01:50:13.520 --> 01:50:15.520]  The judge.
[01:50:15.520 --> 01:50:17.520]  Ah, what state is this?
[01:50:17.520 --> 01:50:19.520]  Texas.
[01:50:19.520 --> 01:50:21.520]  He screwed.
[01:50:21.520 --> 01:50:29.520]  The judge cannot request the issuance of a warrant. Was the county or district attorney there?
[01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:31.520]  No, this was municipal.
[01:50:31.520 --> 01:50:34.520]  Okay, was the city attorney there?
[01:50:34.520 --> 01:50:37.520]  I believe they would have been there.
[01:50:37.520 --> 01:50:42.520]  Well, I didn't ask if they would have been there. I asked, were they there?
[01:50:42.520 --> 01:50:48.520]  I'm not sure. I could call in and find out tomorrow.
[01:50:48.520 --> 01:50:51.520]  Okay, should have been yes, but here's the thing.
[01:50:51.520 --> 01:50:57.520]  In Texas under Chapter 23, the judge is not the one authorized to request a warrant.
[01:50:57.520 --> 01:51:02.520]  The warrant must be specifically requested by the attorney prosecuting for the state,
[01:51:02.520 --> 01:51:05.520]  which city attorneys are not lawfully authorized to do.
[01:51:05.520 --> 01:51:07.520]  Okay?
[01:51:07.520 --> 01:51:11.520]  And they cannot do it in relation to Class C misdemeanors.
[01:51:11.520 --> 01:51:20.520]  Everything in the law only authorizes them to request the issuance of a warrant for A and B misdemeanors or felonies,
[01:51:20.520 --> 01:51:23.520]  not Class C fine-onies.
[01:51:23.520 --> 01:51:25.520]  Okay?
[01:51:25.520 --> 01:51:33.520]  Now, last but not least, if they're the ones that told you they were not going to see you for X amount of time,
[01:51:33.520 --> 01:51:38.520]  which this is a trick they use all the time, so it's what they do.
[01:51:38.520 --> 01:51:44.520]  You need to file a complaint against that judge and that prosecutor for subverting people's rights by the process they're using,
[01:51:44.520 --> 01:51:46.520]  because here's what they do.
[01:51:46.520 --> 01:51:51.520]  They intentionally tell you we're not going to see you for this amount of time.
[01:51:51.520 --> 01:52:01.520]  Then they very carefully monitor every one that's there to see if anyone leaves the building or goes out of earshot to the bathroom or anywhere else.
[01:52:01.520 --> 01:52:10.520]  Then they immediately inform the judge who then immediately calls that person's name, who of course is not there to hear it,
[01:52:10.520 --> 01:52:21.520]  so that they can then turn around and order the issuance of a warrant for failure to appear and thus get the fee for the warrant on top of everything else.
[01:52:21.520 --> 01:52:24.520]  This is a common practice in these courts.
[01:52:24.520 --> 01:52:34.520]  It is absolutely 100% corrupt and it goes on thousands of times a day across the state.
[01:52:34.520 --> 01:52:37.520]  Yeah, I can tell they're pulling the rug off my feet.
[01:52:37.520 --> 01:52:39.520]  Yeah, they do that with everybody.
[01:52:39.520 --> 01:52:42.520]  This is exactly the kind of crap they pull.
[01:52:42.520 --> 01:52:49.520]  This is exactly what's dishonest about them and why they should never be allowed to handle cases.
[01:52:49.520 --> 01:52:54.520]  Yeah, so I was like, they're still here though, right?
[01:52:54.520 --> 01:52:55.520]  She's like, no.
[01:52:55.520 --> 01:52:59.520]  She went through her spiel, explained it why.
[01:52:59.520 --> 01:53:05.520]  I didn't want to stand there and argue because the bailiff was standing right there and I was like, well, are you going to slap some cuss on me?
[01:53:05.520 --> 01:53:07.520]  I was like, okay, I'll handle it.
[01:53:07.520 --> 01:53:09.520]  They walked out.
[01:53:09.520 --> 01:53:20.520]  Yeah, file a motion to recall the warrant, file a criminal complaint against the prosecuting attorney and the judge for criminal conspiracy to violate rights under color of law,
[01:53:20.520 --> 01:53:32.520]  which they did by telling you they weren't going to see you before a certain amount of time or a certain time of day and then knowingly calling your name when you were no longer present to make it appear that you had failed to appear.
[01:53:32.520 --> 01:53:36.520]  It's a complete scam job.
[01:53:36.520 --> 01:53:42.520]  Okay, but then, dang, I'm just afraid they're going to say, well, he wasn't there.
[01:53:42.520 --> 01:53:45.520]  He was left and they even sent the bailiff outside.
[01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:57.520]  This is the reason why I tell people, take a witness and record all at the same time so that someone is there that can testify as to what was said and what you were told.
[01:53:57.520 --> 01:53:59.520]  Of course you left.
[01:53:59.520 --> 01:54:05.520]  They told you they weren't going to see you for three hours, right?
[01:54:05.520 --> 01:54:06.520]  Right.
[01:54:06.520 --> 01:54:07.520]  Okay.
[01:54:07.520 --> 01:54:11.520]  It's insane to be honest, but I thought it was going to be a couple hours because that's how long it waited.
[01:54:11.520 --> 01:54:13.520]  Well, now, hold on, hold on.
[01:54:13.520 --> 01:54:14.520]  Here's the problem.
[01:54:14.520 --> 01:54:15.520]  Yes.
[01:54:15.520 --> 01:54:18.520]  Don't be thinking like that.
[01:54:18.520 --> 01:54:24.520]  If they tell you they're going to see you eventually, then you get them to commit to a specific time.
[01:54:24.520 --> 01:54:27.520]  Don't ever assume anything.
[01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:31.520]  That's a major mistake.
[01:54:31.520 --> 01:54:36.520]  As you can see at this point, right?
[01:54:36.520 --> 01:54:37.520]  Hello?
[01:54:37.520 --> 01:54:38.520]  Yeah.
[01:54:38.520 --> 01:54:40.520]  Okay, because it's always a setup.
[01:54:40.520 --> 01:54:46.520]  It's always a setup.
[01:54:46.520 --> 01:54:54.520]  And you're going in there fighting blind because you don't know how they play this game and they play it very corruptly.
[01:54:54.520 --> 01:54:55.520]  Yeah.
[01:54:55.520 --> 01:55:05.520]  So do the things I told you, file a judicial conduct complaint, file criminal complaints, file a motion to recall warrant or to quash the warrant rather.
[01:55:05.520 --> 01:55:10.520]  And what is the charge?
[01:55:10.520 --> 01:55:11.520]  Feeding.
[01:55:11.520 --> 01:55:12.520]  Okay.
[01:55:12.520 --> 01:55:16.520]  Go to my legal blog and download those documents and get them filed.
[01:55:16.520 --> 01:55:17.520]  Done.
[01:55:17.520 --> 01:55:18.520]  Done?
[01:55:18.520 --> 01:55:19.520]  Yeah.
[01:55:19.520 --> 01:55:20.520]  Okay.
[01:55:20.520 --> 01:55:21.520]  I'm done.
[01:55:21.520 --> 01:55:23.520]  That's why I was there for a motion series.
[01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:25.520]  Okay.
[01:55:25.520 --> 01:55:26.520]  Then...
[01:55:26.520 --> 01:55:28.520]  They're supposed to hear my motions.
[01:55:28.520 --> 01:55:30.520]  They already have chip on their shows.
[01:55:30.520 --> 01:55:34.520]  Yeah, but the thing is, is they set your motions hearing for a specific time.
[01:55:34.520 --> 01:55:36.520]  Did they not?
[01:55:36.520 --> 01:55:38.520]  Yeah, they told me 2 p.m.
[01:55:38.520 --> 01:55:39.520]  Okay.
[01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:42.520]  And then they told you they weren't going to have it, right?
[01:55:42.520 --> 01:55:48.520]  Then they told me, no, you're in the pre-trial line, so I had to sign the court board to get in line.
[01:55:48.520 --> 01:55:49.520]  And...
[01:55:49.520 --> 01:55:54.520]  What do you mean to get in line, to be heard or to even get into court room?
[01:55:54.520 --> 01:55:59.520]  To be heard to have the pre-trial, because, no, it was in...
[01:55:59.520 --> 01:56:08.520]  I was in the court room, but to be heard in line, they called people off for pre-trial off this sign-in sheet.
[01:56:08.520 --> 01:56:11.520]  And that's what happened.
[01:56:11.520 --> 01:56:15.520]  I mean, the people who were working to sign in after me were walking in the parking lot.
[01:56:15.520 --> 01:56:20.520]  I walked in and, oh, she told me the judge had disappeared.
[01:56:20.520 --> 01:56:26.520]  Yeah, and that's because they're very carefully watching to see if anyone on that list leaves that building so that they can do this.
[01:56:26.520 --> 01:56:29.520]  This is something they do constantly.
[01:56:29.520 --> 01:56:36.520]  Yeah, I would have argued, hey, there's a bunch of other people still in this court room, but I just didn't want to see them slapping those cuffs on me.
[01:56:36.520 --> 01:56:39.520]  So I was like, okay, just wait a long time.
[01:56:39.520 --> 01:56:40.520]  I said, okay, I'll hang on.
[01:56:40.520 --> 01:56:44.520]  Well, that's liable to happen anyway if they issued that warrant.
[01:56:44.520 --> 01:57:08.520]  The thing is, is when you read 15.17 and 14.05 and 06 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and you look at Chapter 23, you will find very clearly that there is no language whatsoever that authorizes the issuance of a warrant for failure to appear in relation to a citation.
[01:57:08.520 --> 01:57:13.520]  Now, did they send you a written notice of your motions hearing?
[01:57:13.520 --> 01:57:17.520]  I believe there was.
[01:57:17.520 --> 01:57:18.520]  Yeah.
[01:57:18.520 --> 01:57:19.520]  Okay.
[01:57:19.520 --> 01:57:20.520]  Yes.
[01:57:20.520 --> 01:57:22.520]  And it said two o'clock.
[01:57:22.520 --> 01:57:23.520]  Yes.
[01:57:23.520 --> 01:57:33.520]  And did they give you any notice that you were going to be in a line of people for motions hearings?
[01:57:33.520 --> 01:57:34.520]  No.
[01:57:34.520 --> 01:57:35.520]  No.
[01:57:35.520 --> 01:57:37.520]  That was under the assumption that was going to be it.
[01:57:37.520 --> 01:57:40.520]  I was going to go at 2 p.m. and they were going to be, we were going to be happy.
[01:57:40.520 --> 01:57:42.520]  Right, which is something else they do.
[01:57:42.520 --> 01:57:47.520]  They stack you up so that you're there wasting time and being delayed.
[01:57:47.520 --> 01:57:51.520]  Okay, so file the documents that we've talked about.
[01:57:51.520 --> 01:58:01.520]  Hopefully nothing will happen between now and next Monday or you can call into Randy on Thursday or Friday if you've got any other questions because he'll give you some information as well.
[01:58:01.520 --> 01:58:11.520]  It won't be as directly relevant, but because I know the statute's on all that as far as the traffic stuff goes and he does, but he knows it well enough.
[01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:12.520]  Okay.
[01:58:12.520 --> 01:58:13.520]  Right.
[01:58:13.520 --> 01:58:15.520]  So get that done.
[01:58:15.520 --> 01:58:21.520]  Get those motions in to, to quash the warrant and so on and so forth as well as the complaint.
[01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:24.520]  Make sure you file a motion to quash that complaint as well as the one for speeding.
[01:58:24.520 --> 01:58:25.520]  Okay.
[01:58:25.520 --> 01:58:26.520]  Hello.
[01:58:26.520 --> 01:58:29.520]  Oh yeah, that's it.
[01:58:29.520 --> 01:58:30.520]  Okay.
[01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:31.520]  That one's in.
[01:58:31.520 --> 01:58:32.520]  I've got everything.
[01:58:32.520 --> 01:58:34.520]  I'm waiting on discovery and everything.
[01:58:34.520 --> 01:58:37.520]  They're dragging their heels, but that's the CRR's in.
[01:58:37.520 --> 01:58:38.520]  All right.
[01:58:38.520 --> 01:58:40.520]  Well, I'm out of time, man, so I got to cut you off.
[01:58:40.520 --> 01:58:41.520]  All right, folks.
[01:58:41.520 --> 01:58:44.520]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:58:44.520 --> 01:58:45.520]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:45.520 --> 01:58:46.520]  Thanks for listening.
[01:58:46.520 --> 01:58:47.520]  Y'all have a great week.
[01:58:47.520 --> 01:59:16.520]  God bless.
[01:59:17.520 --> 01:59:39.520]  Thank you.
[01:59:39.520 --> 01:59:56.520]  Thank you.