[00:00.000 --> 00:07.680]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns, providing the jelly
[00:07.680 --> 00:15.400]  bulletins for the Commodities Market, Today in History, News Updates, and the Inside Scoop
[00:15.400 --> 00:23.560]  into the Tides of the Alternative.
[00:23.560 --> 00:31.720]  It's for the 11th of April, 2018, closed with gold $1,353.22 an ounce, silver $16.68 an ounce,
[00:31.720 --> 00:41.600]  Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash
[00:41.600 --> 00:55.560]  at $652.90, and finally litecoins at $114.34 a cryptocoin.
[00:55.560 --> 01:01.200]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act
[01:01.200 --> 01:06.600]  of 1968, which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion,
[01:06.600 --> 01:08.000]  sex, or national origin.
[01:08.000 --> 01:13.160]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.160 --> 01:18.160]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.160 --> 01:27.200]  Today in History, in recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a
[01:27.200 --> 01:31.800]  chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured,
[01:31.800 --> 01:36.560]  an attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
[01:36.560 --> 01:41.480]  by the United States, and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:41.480 --> 01:43.360]  evidence as of yet.
[01:43.360 --> 01:47.200]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any and
[01:47.200 --> 01:51.560]  all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new
[01:51.560 --> 01:52.560]  and smart.
[01:52.560 --> 01:56.440]  Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who
[01:56.440 --> 01:58.600]  kills its people and enjoys it.
[01:58.600 --> 02:02.640]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical
[02:02.640 --> 02:06.840]  attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.840 --> 02:11.040]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the Organization
[02:11.040 --> 02:15.840]  for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the sign of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.840 --> 02:19.400]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.000]  war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.760]  rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one of the more
[02:28.760 --> 02:32.520]  notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.520 --> 02:37.280]  I'm going to surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on
[02:37.280 --> 02:42.160]  Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government,
[02:42.160 --> 02:44.400]  which has been fighting terrorists.
[02:44.400 --> 02:48.240]  Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will
[02:48.240 --> 02:51.520]  be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[02:51.520 --> 02:58.520]  This was Kirk Rode with your loading on for April 11, 2018.
[02:58.520 --> 03:05.520]  Thanks for watching.
[03:58.520 --> 04:28.480]  Good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your
[04:28.480 --> 04:29.480]  host Eddie Craig.
[04:29.480 --> 04:33.680]  It is April 30, 2018.
[04:33.680 --> 04:38.280]  We are now, four months, or coming up on five months into the new year.
[04:38.280 --> 04:40.480]  We have hit the end of number four.
[04:40.480 --> 04:44.920]  Well, I don't have a whole lot to talk about offline tonight.
[04:44.920 --> 04:51.760]  I have spent most of my days, last few days, working on a bunch of other stuff, the cyber
[04:51.760 --> 04:58.280]  alarm material, the aquaponics design and layout and all that other good stuff, if I'm
[04:58.280 --> 05:02.440]  even going to manage to get that off the ground, I'm trying to figure out how all that's going
[05:02.440 --> 05:03.440]  to work.
[05:03.440 --> 05:10.680]  I've seen the sunrise every morning for the past week, and have not even set foot in my
[05:10.680 --> 05:15.240]  bedroom until two or three hours after sunrise, and then of course my dog gets upset when
[05:15.240 --> 05:20.000]  I sleep past nine, so that's just been a short lived day for me.
[05:20.000 --> 05:27.640]  But in any case, the phone lines are open, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[05:27.640 --> 05:32.640]  Now since I've spent most of my time the last few days working on this, I haven't been looking
[05:32.640 --> 05:39.400]  into a lot of the other things that I typically look at each day, like some of the news reports
[05:39.400 --> 05:44.560]  on cops and courts and all this other kind of stuff, and some of the legal research that
[05:44.560 --> 05:51.400]  I have been working on, trying to get the second version of the seminar up and going.
[05:51.400 --> 05:59.400]  But it's slow, I mean it took me two and a half months to do the book and the first few
[05:59.400 --> 06:07.920]  pleadings in the original seminar, and two years just about to get all of the 400 plus
[06:07.920 --> 06:14.680]  pleadings that are in it all written out and planned out and researched out and ready to
[06:14.680 --> 06:16.800]  go for all that.
[06:16.800 --> 06:23.240]  I'm trying to do all of that in one step by myself right now.
[06:23.240 --> 06:28.320]  I didn't know if I ever wanted to dig into this that deep and that hard again, but as
[06:28.320 --> 06:36.200]  it turns out, there's enough information now to make the case virtually irrefutable as to
[06:36.200 --> 06:41.720]  what the state of Texas has been doing to the people of Texas through fraud.
[06:41.720 --> 06:48.840]  I can make this case, I can make this case winnable, I can make this case stick.
[06:48.840 --> 06:54.600]  But this case is not the ones they're doing in their court, it's the one where we're going
[06:54.600 --> 07:00.680]  to have to sue the living crap out of every state, agency and political subdivision to
[07:00.680 --> 07:03.960]  make them stop.
[07:03.960 --> 07:13.880]  They are making too much money in these kangaroo courts to ever put a stop to it on their own.
[07:13.880 --> 07:17.040]  That is just a simple fact.
[07:17.040 --> 07:23.240]  They are stealing more through fraud than they can ever hope to make honest, and like
[07:23.240 --> 07:32.600]  any good racketeering scheme, those that get it working hate to give it up, especially
[07:32.600 --> 07:39.960]  when they're the only ones that can punish themselves for their crimes, if that wasn't
[07:39.960 --> 07:42.080]  bad enough.
[07:42.080 --> 07:46.600]  So the fact is, ladies and gentlemen, until we band together with the knowledge that I'm
[07:46.600 --> 07:55.680]  trying to get out there to you to put an end to this, it's not going away.
[07:55.680 --> 08:00.360]  They will keep doing the same thing they've been doing for as long as they can possibly
[08:00.360 --> 08:08.720]  do it until we either stop them by refusing to convict or we shoot them and try them for
[08:08.720 --> 08:12.560]  sedition and treason.
[08:12.560 --> 08:18.040]  I'm not looking forward to the latter, but I can't deny that it's entirely possible that
[08:18.040 --> 08:23.200]  that's what is going to come down to to regain any sort of control of our country and our
[08:23.200 --> 08:32.120]  lives because they are hell bound for leather on preventing us from having our rightful
[08:32.120 --> 08:34.200]  do as the people.
[08:34.200 --> 08:39.560]  And I for one have been tired of that for a very long time, the whole reason I'm here.
[08:39.560 --> 08:46.920]  I'm tired of being told that somebody else knows better than me what I can and can't
[08:46.920 --> 08:53.240]  do when I'm not doing anything to anyone whatsoever.
[08:53.240 --> 09:00.360]  The state and government in general has gone far beyond its original purpose.
[09:00.360 --> 09:03.200]  It is intruding in areas it was never meant to go.
[09:03.200 --> 09:08.320]  In fact, it is prohibited from going and it's doing it anyway.
[09:08.320 --> 09:15.920]  And I know I'm using a non-personable it, but it's the mindset of the bureaucrats in
[09:15.920 --> 09:21.400]  it that think they understand what's going on and what they can and cannot do.
[09:21.400 --> 09:25.760]  They've been indoctrinated into that just as much as the majority of the people have
[09:25.760 --> 09:28.560]  as to believing that it's true.
[09:28.560 --> 09:32.520]  So you can't really blame those that work there because they don't know any better.
[09:32.520 --> 09:38.680]  They're just as dumb and ignorant as you were the first time you heard this information.
[09:38.680 --> 09:43.920]  The big difference is their willingness to accept it and understand it and take it into
[09:43.920 --> 09:50.400]  consideration because their livelihood literally depends upon it.
[09:50.400 --> 09:56.160]  The more blind they remain, the more employable they remain.
[09:56.160 --> 09:59.560]  And that's just the facts of it.
[09:59.560 --> 10:07.360]  So the longer we allow that to be the case, the longer we remain where we are and enslave
[10:07.360 --> 10:15.200]  to those that should never have had any power over us whatsoever.
[10:15.200 --> 10:16.960]  Only we can fix it.
[10:16.960 --> 10:22.240]  We're the only ones that are going to be willing to fix it because the government and those
[10:22.240 --> 10:26.880]  in it like it just the way it is.
[10:26.880 --> 10:34.160]  The moment you remember that and the moment you consider that they're not going to stop,
[10:34.160 --> 10:39.480]  hopefully that will be the moment when you decide enough is enough and I'm not going
[10:39.480 --> 10:41.600]  to let it happen anymore.
[10:41.600 --> 10:43.200]  I don't care who believes me.
[10:43.200 --> 10:44.880]  I don't care who will listen.
[10:44.880 --> 10:46.840]  I'm going to shot this from the rooftops.
[10:46.840 --> 10:48.960]  I'm going to show it in black and white.
[10:48.960 --> 10:55.280]  I'm going to do everything within my power to make those that I know understand what's
[10:55.280 --> 10:57.280]  going on.
[10:57.280 --> 11:04.400]  But remember you can't just throw a bit of bait in the water without a hook attached to it
[11:04.400 --> 11:08.680]  and catch a fish, can't do it.
[11:08.680 --> 11:14.080]  The basic information, the hook is being able to explain the information well enough that
[11:14.080 --> 11:22.200]  they want to know more and they trust you as a source to refer them to what is more.
[11:22.200 --> 11:26.160]  Until you have that hook, you're not prepared to fish.
[11:26.160 --> 11:31.440]  You're just feeding the fish and you're getting nothing in return for it and neither are they
[11:31.440 --> 11:34.240]  except a fat belly.
[11:34.240 --> 11:36.240]  Okay?
[11:36.240 --> 11:38.160]  So let's work together.
[11:38.160 --> 11:39.360]  Let's make the change.
[11:39.360 --> 11:41.240]  Let's get this going.
[11:41.240 --> 11:45.560]  That being said, I now have some callers up on the board and the first one we have in
[11:45.560 --> 11:47.880]  line is Riley.
[11:47.880 --> 11:49.880]  Riley, what can we do for you?
[11:49.880 --> 11:52.880]  This is Debbie Bartholomew.
[11:52.880 --> 11:53.880]  Yes, ma'am.
[11:53.880 --> 11:54.880]  Is this Eddie Craig?
[11:54.880 --> 11:56.600]  It is.
[11:56.600 --> 12:04.040]  I had emailed you a complaint that I filed at the Texas Supreme Court.
[12:04.040 --> 12:05.840]  Yes, ma'am.
[12:05.840 --> 12:07.840]  I hope you read it.
[12:07.840 --> 12:19.960]  If you noticed, I went to the local administrative judge who is Judge Hatch in Lubbock on the
[12:19.960 --> 12:28.920]  situation of the government filing false records in a court proceeding which corrupted the
[12:28.920 --> 12:36.920]  whole court system in the area of Texas that I live in.
[12:36.920 --> 12:44.480]  And I took the matter to Kelly G. Moore, which is the ninth administrative judicial
[12:44.480 --> 12:55.320]  region presiding judge of the situation, and he basically said, well, just appeal it.
[12:55.320 --> 12:56.320]  Appeal it.
[12:56.320 --> 13:00.600]  And I said, how do you appeal false records that are filed?
[13:00.600 --> 13:01.600]  Okay.
[13:01.600 --> 13:04.200]  Let me ask this question for clarification.
[13:04.200 --> 13:08.160]  What records are you saying they filed that were false?
[13:08.160 --> 13:16.400]  Well, when the Attorney, Texas Attorney General and the Office of the District Attorney filed
[13:16.400 --> 13:19.120]  their motions, they made false...
[13:19.120 --> 13:21.920]  Motions in relation to what, ma'am?
[13:21.920 --> 13:26.360]  In a court proceeding that I was in.
[13:26.360 --> 13:27.360]  Okay.
[13:27.360 --> 13:31.240]  Can I ask what kind of proceeding?
[13:31.240 --> 13:40.080]  I originally went into court, ex parte, for an urgent court order for an urgent disinternment.
[13:40.080 --> 13:41.080]  Okay.
[13:41.080 --> 13:49.280]  And the medical examiner violated the court order.
[13:49.280 --> 13:53.040]  So, several years later, I went back in.
[13:53.040 --> 13:55.920]  So, you've got the court order you went in for?
[13:55.920 --> 13:56.920]  Yes.
[13:56.920 --> 13:57.920]  Okay.
[13:57.920 --> 14:01.800]  And it ordered the medical examiner to do what?
[14:01.800 --> 14:06.880]  To disintern the body that was in my mother's grave.
[14:06.880 --> 14:08.280]  Okay.
[14:08.280 --> 14:11.960]  And they violated the court order how?
[14:11.960 --> 14:20.120]  They violated the court order by not obtaining a conclusive identification or conducting
[14:20.120 --> 14:21.840]  a DNA.
[14:21.840 --> 14:24.480]  Were they ordered in the order to do that?
[14:24.480 --> 14:26.880]  Yes, it did.
[14:26.880 --> 14:27.880]  Okay.
[14:27.880 --> 14:35.360]  So, the order said that they, one, had to disintern the body, two, they had to DNA test the body,
[14:35.360 --> 14:40.760]  three, they had to identify the body by whatever means available to do to them, whether it
[14:40.760 --> 14:43.760]  be through DNA analysis, dental records or whatever.
[14:43.760 --> 14:46.800]  The order specifically said those things.
[14:46.800 --> 14:51.400]  The only way they could do that is through the DNA testing.
[14:51.400 --> 14:54.960]  Did she not have any teeth?
[14:54.960 --> 15:00.440]  It was believed that the wrong body was buried in my mother's grave.
[15:00.440 --> 15:01.440]  Okay.
[15:01.440 --> 15:04.040]  And so...
[15:04.040 --> 15:07.640]  But you're saying they didn't do the things that were in the order?
[15:07.640 --> 15:10.080]  Oh, absolutely not.
[15:10.080 --> 15:11.080]  Okay.
[15:11.080 --> 15:14.640]  What did they do instead?
[15:14.640 --> 15:19.360]  They took the body over to the medical examiner's office.
[15:19.360 --> 15:22.000]  What happened there?
[15:22.000 --> 15:25.240]  I don't know.
[15:25.240 --> 15:33.240]  I was told that the tissues they took off the body for the DNA testing, they lost.
[15:33.240 --> 15:45.240]  And when the body was supposedly removed, I asked the district attorney's office for
[15:45.240 --> 15:53.480]  a chain of custody form concerning that situation and the district attorney's office didn't
[15:53.480 --> 16:01.640]  even have a chain of custody concerning the disinternment through the medical examiners
[16:01.640 --> 16:02.640]  or...
[16:02.640 --> 16:06.560]  Why would the district attorney have a chain of custody?
[16:06.560 --> 16:10.640]  How did the district attorney get involved in this case?
[16:10.640 --> 16:16.320]  Because when you ask under the Open Records Act, the district attorney always intercedes
[16:16.320 --> 16:18.640]  in this area.
[16:18.640 --> 16:20.640]  Okay.
[16:20.640 --> 16:25.760]  But we're not talking about anything that was in an Open Records Act except for the
[16:25.760 --> 16:28.960]  report you're requesting, right?
[16:28.960 --> 16:35.880]  The only way that I could get anything concerning the situation, even though I was involved,
[16:35.880 --> 16:41.480]  even though the court order involved me, was through the Open Records Act.
[16:41.480 --> 16:42.480]  Okay.
[16:42.480 --> 16:48.120]  We'll hang on just a moment, ma'am, and let me get this, or our breakout away and then
[16:48.120 --> 16:50.120]  we'll be right back, okay?
[16:50.120 --> 16:51.120]  Sure.
[16:51.120 --> 16:52.120]  All right, folks.
[16:52.120 --> 16:53.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[16:53.120 --> 16:58.120]  Y'all hang in there and we will be right back after this break.
[16:58.120 --> 17:01.120]  Thanks, Cookie.
[17:01.120 --> 17:02.120]  Cookie?
[17:02.120 --> 17:03.120]  We love cookies.
[17:03.120 --> 17:04.120]  Oh.
[17:04.120 --> 17:05.120]  Hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:05.120 --> 17:06.120]  These are yucky cookies.
[17:06.120 --> 17:07.120]  Cookie?
[17:07.120 --> 17:08.120]  Yucky?
[17:08.120 --> 17:09.120]  No.
[17:09.120 --> 17:10.120]  No bad cookies.
[17:10.120 --> 17:11.120]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:11.120 --> 17:12.120]  These are cyber-cookies.
[17:12.120 --> 17:13.120]  No candy?
[17:13.120 --> 17:14.120]  No.
[17:14.120 --> 17:17.120]  They are cyber-cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:17.120 --> 17:18.120]  They have apples.
[17:18.120 --> 17:19.120]  Really?
[17:19.120 --> 17:20.120]  Oh.
[17:20.120 --> 17:21.120]  That's an actual apple.
[17:21.120 --> 17:22.120]  Hmm.
[17:22.120 --> 17:23.120]  Yummy apple.
[17:23.120 --> 17:26.800]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:26.800 --> 17:32.920]  I click Control, Shift, Delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:32.920 --> 17:34.520]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.520 --> 17:40.200]  Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand
[17:40.200 --> 17:46.200]  side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:46.200 --> 17:47.200]  new cookie.
[17:47.200 --> 17:49.200]  New cookies for me?
[17:49.200 --> 17:51.040]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.040 --> 17:55.800]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this
[17:55.800 --> 17:56.800]  radio network, too.
[17:56.800 --> 17:57.800]  These are cookies.
[17:57.800 --> 17:58.800]  These look like a pie.
[17:58.800 --> 18:05.800]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.800 --> 18:09.480]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[18:09.480 --> 18:13.640]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.640 --> 18:14.640]  can win, too.
[18:14.640 --> 18:19.440]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.440 --> 18:24.880]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.880 --> 18:28.760]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:28.760 --> 18:34.040]  how to turn the financial tables on them, and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.040 --> 18:39.160]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.160 --> 18:41.320]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.320 --> 18:46.840]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner
[18:46.840 --> 18:49.760]  or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.760 --> 18:57.560]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.560 --> 19:07.560]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:07.560 --> 19:33.560]  at yahoo.com.
[19:33.560 --> 19:35.560]  We are speaking of Ms. Debbie Bartholomew.
[19:35.560 --> 19:39.560]  All right, Ms. Bartholomew, please go ahead.
[19:39.560 --> 19:47.760]  And as time went on, I heard that the body that was disinterred from my mother's grave,
[19:47.760 --> 19:51.360]  that the medical examiner did an autopsy on it.
[19:51.360 --> 19:59.560]  So I wrote under the Open Records Act requesting all pictures, the autopsy report, everything
[19:59.560 --> 20:08.560]  concerning the situation, and the district attorney said that I wasn't allowed to have
[20:08.560 --> 20:16.560]  anything, and they appealed it to the Texas Attorney General's Office for an opinion ruling.
[20:16.560 --> 20:22.360]  The Texas Attorney General's Office, and I have all of the letters, said we've received
[20:22.360 --> 20:28.560]  all the pictures, we have received everything, and we agree with the district attorney that
[20:28.560 --> 20:36.560]  you are not allowed at the public or you are not allowed to view anything, that it is not.
[20:36.560 --> 20:40.560]  All right, I'm still having a problem with the situation here.
[20:40.560 --> 20:50.560]  You have a court order that ordered the ME to turn this information once discovered over to whom?
[20:50.560 --> 21:00.560]  Well, they were supposed to turn the conclusive identification, they were supposed to turn it over to me.
[21:00.560 --> 21:01.560]  Okay.
[21:01.560 --> 21:04.560]  Is that stated in the order?
[21:04.560 --> 21:06.560]  No, it isn't.
[21:06.560 --> 21:07.560]  Okay.
[21:07.560 --> 21:08.560]  I'm just assuming that.
[21:08.560 --> 21:11.560]  Well, that's where you have a problem.
[21:11.560 --> 21:14.560]  Don't ever do that.
[21:14.560 --> 21:16.560]  Okay.
[21:16.560 --> 21:22.560]  If the order specifically ordered them to produce the information and give it to you, they would
[21:22.560 --> 21:26.560]  have to do it, and you don't have to file an information request to get it because you
[21:26.560 --> 21:29.560]  have a court order to get it.
[21:29.560 --> 21:33.560]  Well, then, if they have a court order...
[21:33.560 --> 21:34.560]  No, no, no, no, no.
[21:34.560 --> 21:35.560]  I didn't say they had.
[21:35.560 --> 21:41.560]  I said if it was in the court order that you were supposed to get it, then the public information
[21:41.560 --> 21:43.560]  request is irrelevant.
[21:43.560 --> 21:49.560]  But you don't know if it's in the order based upon what you just told me.
[21:49.560 --> 21:52.560]  So where is this order?
[21:52.560 --> 21:54.560]  Did you not read it?
[21:54.560 --> 21:55.560]  Yes, I did.
[21:55.560 --> 21:56.560]  I did.
[21:56.560 --> 21:57.560]  I have it.
[21:57.560 --> 21:58.560]  Okay.
[21:58.560 --> 22:03.560]  If you have it, does it instruct them to turn that information over to you?
[22:03.560 --> 22:04.560]  No.
[22:04.560 --> 22:05.560]  Okay.
[22:05.560 --> 22:07.560]  There's your problem.
[22:07.560 --> 22:15.560]  It sounds to me like you're going to have to go back and get another order ordering them
[22:15.560 --> 22:20.560]  to turn that information over to you.
[22:20.560 --> 22:31.560]  Well, as time went on, I understand what you're saying, but please let me continue on the
[22:31.560 --> 22:36.560]  Attorney General when the Attorney General ruled against me.
[22:36.560 --> 22:43.560]  The district attorney changed and said they sent the wrong pictures that it wasn't of
[22:43.560 --> 22:46.560]  the disinterment, that it was of the disinterment.
[22:46.560 --> 22:51.560]  It was not of the autopsy report.
[22:51.560 --> 23:01.560]  And as time went on, I have records to prove that my mother's body, when my mother died
[23:01.560 --> 23:10.560]  in Covenant Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, that her body was illegally put into a donor program.
[23:10.560 --> 23:15.560]  And I believe that the government was trying to cover that up.
[23:15.560 --> 23:16.560]  Okay.
[23:16.560 --> 23:21.560]  That's something separate and apart from the information that we're talking about at the
[23:21.560 --> 23:22.560]  moment, though.
[23:22.560 --> 23:27.560]  That may have been something you've discovered apart from this, but as far as the information
[23:27.560 --> 23:34.560]  that you're wanting, I'm still not hearing what you're telling me is false documents produced
[23:34.560 --> 23:37.560]  by any agency.
[23:37.560 --> 23:41.560]  They said that they didn't send the correct information to the AG.
[23:41.560 --> 23:47.560]  What evidence do you have that that is not true if you don't have any of the evidence
[23:47.560 --> 23:53.560]  that they've got?
[23:53.560 --> 24:07.560]  Somebody gave me a disc of some pictures.
[24:07.560 --> 24:16.560]  And because the medical examiner resigned from that medical examiner's office and moved
[24:16.560 --> 24:24.560]  to Florida, and I called the medical examiner, and the medical examiner said he definitely
[24:24.560 --> 24:34.560]  did an autopsy on the body and that I should go to Texas Tech University Health Science
[24:34.560 --> 24:39.560]  Center in order to get the autopsy report.
[24:39.560 --> 24:40.560]  Okay.
[24:40.560 --> 24:44.560]  That still doesn't answer my question.
[24:44.560 --> 24:49.560]  You're taking coincidences, whatever them there actually are that may exist, and you're making
[24:49.560 --> 24:53.560]  inferences from them that I don't see how you're making.
[24:53.560 --> 24:56.560]  I understand that you have a concern here.
[24:56.560 --> 25:03.560]  I really do, but I'm still not able to connect these dots, and if I can't connect them, then
[25:03.560 --> 25:06.560]  they're not going to connect them.
[25:06.560 --> 25:12.560]  So what I'm asking you is, this disc that you say you've gotten, what is the source?
[25:12.560 --> 25:17.560]  Is it an official source that would have the actual records?
[25:17.560 --> 25:18.560]  I believe so.
[25:18.560 --> 25:19.560]  Wait a minute.
[25:19.560 --> 25:20.560]  Wait a minute.
[25:20.560 --> 25:22.560]  Now, that's a problem right there.
[25:22.560 --> 25:25.560]  You believe so.
[25:25.560 --> 25:27.560]  You don't know so.
[25:27.560 --> 25:35.560]  How do you make a case with I believe but can't prove?
[25:35.560 --> 25:37.560]  You see the wall you're running into here?
[25:37.560 --> 25:42.560]  The medical examiner has, if the medical examiner doesn't release their information.
[25:42.560 --> 25:47.560]  The medical examiner has laws they have to follow too.
[25:47.560 --> 25:53.560]  And like I said, an order to do one thing is not an automatic inference that it's an order
[25:53.560 --> 25:57.560]  to do something else with that information.
[25:57.560 --> 26:00.560]  Hence the part about doing autopsy.
[26:00.560 --> 26:02.560]  Well, what do you want me to do with the results of the autopsy?
[26:02.560 --> 26:04.560]  Oh, well, nobody told me what to do about that.
[26:04.560 --> 26:07.560]  And now I've got other laws telling me I can't give it to just anybody.
[26:07.560 --> 26:09.560]  Now, what do I do?
[26:09.560 --> 26:20.560]  If they did a conclusive identification through DNA testing, they were supposed to release the body to me.
[26:20.560 --> 26:23.560]  Is that in the order?
[26:23.560 --> 26:25.560]  Absolutely.
[26:25.560 --> 26:33.560]  Then how can they say that they can give you the body but they can't give you the information?
[26:33.560 --> 26:37.560]  How does the order say one and not the other?
[26:37.560 --> 26:46.560]  Well, that's what the order says.
[26:46.560 --> 26:54.560]  So the order says give her back the body but don't tell her who it belongs to.
[26:54.560 --> 27:06.560]  The only way that I got the information that I did get is because people that have worked in different areas have secretly given me the information.
[27:06.560 --> 27:10.560]  Lubbock is very small and very connected.
[27:10.560 --> 27:12.560]  Okay, I can understand all that.
[27:12.560 --> 27:17.560]  But we're back to an issue here of, one, how did they give it to you?
[27:17.560 --> 27:35.560]  Two, how do you plan on using it without sending those people to jail and possibly yourself at the same time for possessing the information that they would have given you if it's outside of the legal channels in which you have to obtain it and which they have to distribute it?
[27:35.560 --> 27:52.560]  Do you see the quandary I've got here? I don't know how you intend to use this to your advantage in a way other than what I said about getting a court order that says they have to release those records and information to you.
[27:52.560 --> 28:02.560]  One thing that I do have that I got from the district attorney's office is the report of disinterment.
[28:02.560 --> 28:03.560]  Okay.
[28:03.560 --> 28:19.560]  And the report of disinterment says the family and I agree that the remains are of my mother, which is a lie, a total, total lie.
[28:19.560 --> 28:21.560]  That is a false record.
[28:21.560 --> 28:33.560]  And I brought that matter up not only to the district attorney, but I brought it up to the judge. And they still use the record.
[28:33.560 --> 28:37.560]  Which judge? The one that issued this order?
[28:37.560 --> 28:42.560]  I brought the matter up to Judge Pat Thielen.
[28:42.560 --> 28:45.560]  Is that the judge that issued this order?
[28:45.560 --> 28:53.560]  No. No. The one that a judge that issued the order has retired.
[28:53.560 --> 29:05.560]  Okay. And so when you brought this up to this other judge, in what type of situation or case did it come up in?
[29:05.560 --> 29:17.560]  I brought it up to the judge in a motion called a motion for contempt and an order setting hearing.
[29:17.560 --> 29:18.560]  Okay.
[29:18.560 --> 29:22.560]  And it was all detailed in that motion.
[29:22.560 --> 29:26.560]  Okay. An order for contempt against who?
[29:26.560 --> 29:37.560]  Against Thomas R. Beaver, who was the medical examiner at that time.
[29:37.560 --> 29:47.560]  Okay. But didn't he do everything you said the order said he had to do, which was do the disinterment, do the autopsy, and so on and so forth?
[29:47.560 --> 29:50.560]  Hang on just a second, ma'am. I got another break here.
[29:50.560 --> 30:01.560]  All right, folks. We'll be right back. Y'all hang on.
[30:01.560 --> 30:10.560]  Let's get physical, physical. Hey, if you exercise even a tent as much as you should, you can extend your life by years.
[30:10.560 --> 30:15.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll hike right back with the good news in just a moment.
[30:15.560 --> 30:22.560]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:22.560 --> 30:25.560]  That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:25.560 --> 30:28.560]  StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:28.560 --> 30:35.560]  StartPage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified.
[30:35.560 --> 30:39.560]  If you don't like big brothers spying on you, start over with StartPage.
[30:39.560 --> 30:45.560]  Great search results and total privacy. StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:45.560 --> 30:50.560]  Exercise. We all know we need it, but we don't always take the time to do it.
[30:50.560 --> 30:56.560]  Now new evidence says just 15 measly minutes of physical activity a day can extend your life a lot.
[30:56.560 --> 31:03.560]  Researchers in Taiwan found that an hour and a half of exercise a week extended people's lives by three whole years.
[31:03.560 --> 31:05.560]  That's just 13 minutes a day.
[31:05.560 --> 31:14.560]  The study found that small amounts of daily exercise made people 10% less likely to die of cancer and 14% less likely to die for any reason.
[31:14.560 --> 31:20.560]  So come on, couch potatoes, dig out those Olivia Newton-John CDs and let me hear your body talk.
[31:20.560 --> 31:25.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:25.560 --> 31:35.560]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:35.560 --> 31:37.560]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:37.560 --> 31:42.560]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:42.560 --> 31:45.560]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.560 --> 31:48.560]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.560 --> 31:49.560]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.560 --> 31:50.560]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.560 --> 31:51.560]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:51.560 --> 31:52.560]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:52.560 --> 31:54.560]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:54.560 --> 31:55.560]  We're Americans.
[31:55.560 --> 31:57.560]  And we deserve the truth.
[31:57.560 --> 32:26.560]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:57.560 --> 33:02.560]  We all want and deserve it.
[33:02.560 --> 33:31.560]  We all want and deserve it.
[33:32.560 --> 33:33.560]  Hi, folks.
[33:33.560 --> 33:34.560]  We are back.
[33:34.560 --> 33:40.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:40.560 --> 33:44.560]  All right, Ms. Bartholomew, let's see if we can't get this wrapped up here
[33:44.560 --> 33:48.560]  because I got other people waiting in line.
[33:48.560 --> 33:54.560]  Now, again, let me try to get through where I'm at here and try to understand.
[33:54.560 --> 33:59.560]  I'm not trying to disavow you or take away from your situation or anything like that.
[33:59.560 --> 34:04.560]  But there are certain things that have to be covered here in order for the picture to be clear enough
[34:04.560 --> 34:10.560]  to make any recommendations on or much less to understand, okay?
[34:10.560 --> 34:15.560]  So when I ask these questions and the comments, I'm not trying to belittle you in any way.
[34:15.560 --> 34:19.560]  I'm just trying to make sure that I have a firm grasp of where you are
[34:19.560 --> 34:22.560]  and what it is you're trying to accomplish, okay?
[34:22.560 --> 34:24.560]  Oh, absolutely.
[34:24.560 --> 34:29.560]  And if it's necessary, I'd love to call back next Monday.
[34:29.560 --> 34:34.560]  Okay, well, let me see what I can do with this real quick.
[34:34.560 --> 34:37.560]  And then we'll see if it'll be necessary, okay?
[34:37.560 --> 34:38.560]  Okay.
[34:38.560 --> 34:39.560]  All right.
[34:39.560 --> 34:43.560]  Now, as far as the document that the DA gave you,
[34:43.560 --> 34:47.560]  was that something new that the DA had signed recently
[34:47.560 --> 34:56.560]  or was that from the original case before the death in burial occurred or just after it occurred or what?
[34:56.560 --> 35:01.560]  When was that document that they handed over saying everybody agreed done?
[35:01.560 --> 35:06.560]  That was given to me several years ago.
[35:06.560 --> 35:07.560]  Okay.
[35:07.560 --> 35:14.560]  And when did everyone agree on this document if ever?
[35:14.560 --> 35:17.560]  No one ever agreed on it.
[35:17.560 --> 35:21.560]  Okay, who originally gave you all that document?
[35:21.560 --> 35:23.560]  The district attorney's office.
[35:23.560 --> 35:26.560]  The same district attorney or is this someone new?
[35:26.560 --> 35:29.560]  No, the same district attorney.
[35:29.560 --> 35:31.560]  Okay.
[35:31.560 --> 35:36.560]  And who signed this document that the district attorney gave you?
[35:36.560 --> 35:45.560]  Thomas R. Beaver, the licensed medical examiner that worked at the office of the medical examiner in Lubbock, Texas.
[35:45.560 --> 35:50.560]  Okay, so the ME is the one that signed the document that said all the family agreed that that's the body?
[35:50.560 --> 35:52.560]  Yes.
[35:52.560 --> 35:53.560]  Okay.
[35:53.560 --> 35:56.560]  And his is the only signature on it?
[35:56.560 --> 35:58.560]  The only signature.
[35:58.560 --> 35:59.560]  Okay.
[35:59.560 --> 36:04.560]  And why did the DA give you a copy of that document again?
[36:04.560 --> 36:15.560]  Because when I wrote under the Open Records Act for the autopsy report, they gave me that thinking I would think that it was the autopsy report.
[36:15.560 --> 36:16.560]  And it wasn't.
[36:16.560 --> 36:19.560]  It was the report of disinterment.
[36:19.560 --> 36:20.560]  Well, no, wait a minute.
[36:20.560 --> 36:24.560]  When did they disinter the body?
[36:24.560 --> 36:26.560]  They disinter the body.
[36:26.560 --> 36:31.560]  This has been a 15-year long process.
[36:31.560 --> 36:35.560]  They disinterred the body in the year 2006.
[36:35.560 --> 36:39.560]  I, my mother died in 2003.
[36:39.560 --> 36:44.560]  I fought year after year to get the body disinterred.
[36:44.560 --> 36:46.560]  That was in my mother's grave.
[36:46.560 --> 36:55.560]  And the city of Lubbock fought tooth and toenail against me to have that body disinterred.
[36:55.560 --> 37:00.560]  I filed a complaint with the Texas Funeral Service Commission.
[37:00.560 --> 37:05.560]  It was assigned to the chief investigator, Earl Monroe.
[37:05.560 --> 37:24.560]  At that time, the CEO of the funeral commission told Earl Monroe, and I have it recorded on my recorder, that he was told to cover up the investigation, not to investigate, to stonewall the investigation.
[37:24.560 --> 37:29.560]  He did not and was fired from the funeral commission.
[37:29.560 --> 37:32.560]  Okay.
[37:32.560 --> 37:49.560]  It was later, Ann Cosper, an investigator at the funeral commission, wrote, the city manager at that time was, shoot, I can't even think of her name, in Lubbock, Texas.
[37:49.560 --> 38:07.560]  She was the city manager for Lubbock, Texas, and the investigator said, do everything you can not to allow her to disinter that body, to force her into court, to obtain the court order.
[38:07.560 --> 38:17.560]  And Cosper quit the funeral commission and went over and went to work over at the office of the Texas Attorney General.
[38:17.560 --> 38:24.560]  So you got the judge to sign the disinterment order at some point after this?
[38:24.560 --> 38:25.560]  Yes.
[38:25.560 --> 38:26.560]  Okay.
[38:26.560 --> 38:38.560]  And the judge, which was Judge Lanehart in Lubbock, Texas, she told me that she was the judge, and we were in the hallway.
[38:38.560 --> 38:58.560]  The judge told me she was there to protect the city cemetery, that they believed that the wrong body had been buried in my mother's grave, and that I must file a lawsuit against the city of Lubbock.
[38:58.560 --> 39:10.560]  And I told the judge, no, I am not suing anybody, I refuse to sue anybody, I just want a court order to do an urgent disinterment.
[39:10.560 --> 39:18.560]  It took me months and months and months, and I finally got the court order.
[39:18.560 --> 39:21.560]  Okay.
[39:21.560 --> 39:38.560]  All right, you got the court order, they disinterred the body, they did the autopsy, they did all the things as far as you know that the order told them to do because the order did not tell them to turn over the findings to you or to any other member of your family.
[39:38.560 --> 39:58.560]  No, the order did not order them to do an autopsy. Thomas R. Beaver, many years later, when I called him in Florida, told me that Texas Tech had the record that they did the autopsy.
[39:58.560 --> 40:08.560]  The only thing the court order was to do conclusive identification through DNA testing.
[40:08.560 --> 40:09.560]  Okay.
[40:09.560 --> 40:21.560]  And then after the conclusive identification was to release the body to me, which they do not have a chain of custody of record to prove anything.
[40:21.560 --> 40:32.560]  But my point is, is that the information on identity and everything else that's in that is not in the order to be turned over to you.
[40:32.560 --> 40:33.560]  Right?
[40:33.560 --> 40:35.560]  Well, the only thing they turned over to me.
[40:35.560 --> 40:46.560]  I'm not asking what they did turn over, I'm asking you that the order does not specifically order them to turn any of that over to you or the member or any member of your family.
[40:46.560 --> 40:52.560]  No, but I would think if they did a conclusive identification.
[40:52.560 --> 41:03.560]  Well, they don't know why they were ordered to do the identification. They don't know who they can tell about the identification, not unless the order tells them to.
[41:03.560 --> 41:09.560]  Otherwise, any other law on the books is controlling over what they can and can't do.
[41:09.560 --> 41:17.560]  This is where you're running into a problem, what the order doesn't say and do. Okay?
[41:17.560 --> 41:18.560]  Okay.
[41:18.560 --> 41:27.560]  So, you're not going to like the answer based upon what information I have, but this is my suggestion.
[41:27.560 --> 41:35.560]  You need to petition the court for an order to have that information disclosed to you and your family.
[41:35.560 --> 41:52.560]  Ordering them to provide you with copies of the autopsy, copies of the identification reports, copies of all the testing materials, everything to show what was done in reference to the first order.
[41:52.560 --> 41:56.560]  Well, that would be very interesting.
[41:56.560 --> 42:10.560]  Well, I can't argue that one way or the other, but I can tell you that odds are that is the only solution to your problem that is in sight at the moment short of actually suing.
[42:10.560 --> 42:12.560]  Okay, I do not want to sue.
[42:12.560 --> 42:25.560]  Well, I agree. No one does. But the facts are that if they're fighting this hard to prevent it, had you sued them sooner, you might have actually won and gotten this information years ago.
[42:25.560 --> 42:32.560]  You're trying to go through it just to get a judge to sign an order without suing anybody, therein lies your problem.
[42:32.560 --> 42:40.560]  How do you sue in a court that is so corrupt they allowed the district attorney and the general's records?
[42:40.560 --> 42:48.560]  You move for a change of venue. That's the first thing you need to do is move for a change of venue.
[42:48.560 --> 42:59.560]  You have the hearing held somewhere else outside of that county and municipality and district or whatever.
[42:59.560 --> 43:09.560]  If you feel that you can't get a fair trial there for that suit, then you move for a change of venue.
[43:09.560 --> 43:17.560]  But right now, that is the only two options I see available to you to accomplish what it appears to me that you're trying to accomplish.
[43:17.560 --> 43:33.560]  You have to get a judge agree that they need to sign an order to enforce the original order and add the requirement to provide you and your family with the information that is the result of that order or you're going to have to sue to get it.
[43:33.560 --> 43:40.560]  Now, can I go in ex parte for that order?
[43:40.560 --> 43:48.560]  You can try, but I doubt you will get anywhere. They're going for an order like that. If they have the opportunity to respond, the court is going to give it to them.
[43:48.560 --> 43:55.560]  I'm sorry, Ms. Batalimu, but I'm going to take the next caller when we get back, but that should solve your problem and what we got, okay?
[43:55.560 --> 43:56.560]  Thank you very much.
[43:56.560 --> 43:57.560]  Yes, ma'am.
[43:57.560 --> 44:00.560]  All right, folks, y'all hang on. We'll be right back.
[44:00.560 --> 44:14.560]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.560 --> 44:33.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.560 --> 44:51.560]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.560 --> 45:03.560]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.560 --> 45:18.560]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas, behind brave new books and chasing to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.560 --> 45:30.560]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:30.560 --> 45:43.560]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:43.560 --> 45:50.560]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products naturespureorganics.com.
[46:13.560 --> 46:42.560]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show, and yes we are live
[46:42.560 --> 46:54.560]  tonight, April 30th, 2018. All right, now who else do we have in line here? Oh yeah, we have Scott in Texas. Scott, what can we do for you?
[46:54.560 --> 47:14.560]  I've got a problem with my local bank. I have purchased some rental properties and I have sent a letter to the bank seven years ago to clarify a portion of the loan and the bank never, well they responded and they said we've received your letter.
[47:14.560 --> 47:31.560]  However, it's a legal argument. We need to look into it and it's going to take us some time, so give us some time to look into it. Well they never responded back after a couple of years. I started the letters over again and sent them three letters through a notary and created a notarial default.
[47:31.560 --> 47:50.560]  Then I filed a lien against the properties, a mechanics lien against my own properties. Then the bank tried to foreclose, so I went and attempted to sue the bank and get a temporary restraining order and the court would not issue it because they said I had failed to make a proper
[47:50.560 --> 48:08.560]  criminal lawsuit case. However, I did not fully disclose to the court what my case was. I did a poor job of that. That's the reason it was declined. Then I was forced to file bankruptcy therefore and in the bankruptcy court I filed an adversarial proceeding.
[48:08.560 --> 48:24.560]  They have not allowed me to have the adversarial proceeding at this time and it appears what they're going to do is they're going to go ahead and sell the houses and my understanding is that once the bankruptcy court case is closed then the adversarial proceeding is also closed.
[48:24.560 --> 48:39.560]  So I have two questions. The first one is what, they're trying to remove my lien against the properties in the bankruptcy court and my first question is simply what weight does that lien have?
[48:39.560 --> 48:56.560]  Well, it depends on the consequences under which it was done in the first place. I don't know how one can file a mechanics lien against their own property. The whole purpose of a mechanics lien is a claim to a property because the service is rendered but unpaid.
[48:56.560 --> 49:01.560]  How do you claim that against yourself?
[49:01.560 --> 49:13.560]  Well, it goes into one of the crazy arguments. Well, it would have to if you're going to say that you provided services to yourself for a fee and then you didn't pay yourself.
[49:13.560 --> 49:31.560]  Well, I was disassociating myself with the Social Security number. Okay, wait, stop. Right there. Right there. Right there. Far enough. Okay. That is not going to fly. It's not going to get you anywhere except dead broken in jail. Got me?
[49:31.560 --> 49:37.560]  Yes. So we can just disregard the lien then. That's a non-issue.
[49:37.560 --> 49:39.560]  Right?
[49:39.560 --> 49:43.560]  I would say that's a pretty good statement. Yeah.
[49:43.560 --> 50:00.560]  Okay. Another more promising issue is that this adversarial proceeding, you may not be familiar with this. I understand that I can, because it was filed, it was attempted to be filed. It wasn't actually filed, but I have evidence that it was attempted.
[50:00.560 --> 50:15.560]  And that I can file for a motion for abstention in the Bank of State Court and transfer this to the State Court. And the Bank of State Court must state the proceedings and allow me to have my suit against the...
[50:15.560 --> 50:18.560]  Is this in federal court right now?
[50:18.560 --> 50:19.560]  Yes, it is.
[50:19.560 --> 50:42.560]  No, you're not going to get it taken out of federal court and put back into a state court unless both parties agree to that. And that's not going to happen. The moment you would have filed suit against them in a state court, they would have filed a removal to federal court because it's much more favorable to them there.
[50:42.560 --> 50:45.560]  Okay.
[50:45.560 --> 50:50.560]  Do you have any... those required to give me this adversarial proceeding or does this, in fact, go...
[50:50.560 --> 51:05.560]  Okay. Little news flash about American court systems. Every proceeding of any court is an adversarial proceeding, with the simple exception of maybe juvenile court.
[51:05.560 --> 51:13.560]  Well, the understanding was that I would not be able to file this in federal court if it were not for the Bank of State. And that's the reason...
[51:13.560 --> 51:21.560]  Well, the reason the federal court has it is because of diversity jurisdiction.
[51:21.560 --> 51:25.560]  Well, why... how is it diverse to go in the state of Texas?
[51:25.560 --> 51:35.560]  Because are they headquartered in the state of Texas? Or is just the bank you banked through one of their branches in Texas?
[51:35.560 --> 51:44.560]  No, I believe it's a locally owned bank. Fully, locally owned branch.
[51:44.560 --> 51:51.560]  I guarantee this is not a locally owned bank. It may be a bank, but I guarantee you it belongs to one of the bigger banks.
[51:51.560 --> 51:55.560]  I've got their corporate chatter papers. Would it not be reflected in there?
[51:55.560 --> 51:58.560]  Does it show who actually owns them?
[51:58.560 --> 52:01.560]  Yes, local, local people.
[52:01.560 --> 52:06.560]  Is the foreclosure being done under federal law?
[52:06.560 --> 52:09.560]  No, it's under state law claim.
[52:09.560 --> 52:13.560]  Okay. Then how did it get in federal court to begin with?
[52:13.560 --> 52:16.560]  Well, I filed bankruptcy in the federal court. That's the only place...
[52:16.560 --> 52:21.560]  Okay. The bankruptcy proceeding has nothing to do with the foreclosure proceeding.
[52:21.560 --> 52:31.560]  Oh, well, no, no, of course, nobody filed a foreclosure to a non-judicial state, of course.
[52:31.560 --> 52:34.560]  Yeah, I'm aware of that.
[52:34.560 --> 52:37.560]  So, I don't understand the question then.
[52:37.560 --> 52:47.560]  Well, the question I've got is why are we arguing about the federal court when your bankruptcy is not your foreclosure?
[52:47.560 --> 52:54.560]  What are you asking that your bankruptcy is supposed to do in relation to your foreclosure?
[52:54.560 --> 52:59.560]  The bankruptcy was simply supposed to state the proceedings and then allow me to...
[52:59.560 --> 53:01.560]  State what proceedings?
[53:01.560 --> 53:03.560]  The foreclosure.
[53:03.560 --> 53:10.560]  How do you get the idea that a bankruptcy declaration by you stalls the foreclosure on a separate deal?
[53:10.560 --> 53:13.560]  Well, it did. It did. It stalls off.
[53:13.560 --> 53:20.560]  Well, but to what degree are you wanting to do it is my question.
[53:20.560 --> 53:29.560]  To the degree that I can fight the adversarial proceeding in the bankruptcy court or in any court.
[53:29.560 --> 53:34.560]  Again, two separate issues. You're not going to fight the one through the other.
[53:34.560 --> 53:44.560]  How the bankruptcy is allowed to progress will be decided by what the determination is in the bankruptcy.
[53:44.560 --> 53:55.560]  You're only going to be protected as far as the law authorizes you to be protected under bankruptcy in relation to a foreclosure.
[53:55.560 --> 53:58.560]  If there are no protections, it's not giving you anything.
[53:58.560 --> 54:06.560]  It may delay things, but what is going to get you in the end is anybody's guess,
[54:06.560 --> 54:17.560]  because that's going to be in the hands of the judge that rules on your bankruptcy.
[54:17.560 --> 54:20.560]  Okay. Well, I'm a little bit lost then.
[54:20.560 --> 54:23.560]  If I had the claim against the bank, what would have been the proper...
[54:23.560 --> 54:27.560]  What claim do you have against the bank?
[54:27.560 --> 54:30.560]  I had sent the confirmatory writings to the bank.
[54:30.560 --> 54:33.560]  What the hell is a confirmatory writing?
[54:33.560 --> 54:39.560]  I had a question about the loan and I sent a letter to him to confirm.
[54:39.560 --> 54:45.560]  Okay. Let me ask this again now and I'll think this through real clear.
[54:45.560 --> 54:52.560]  What question about the loan could you possibly ask the lender who gave you the loan
[54:52.560 --> 55:02.560]  that would nullify the loan unless the question relates specifically to an identifiable fraud in the loan itself
[55:02.560 --> 55:09.560]  or in the contract for the loan?
[55:09.560 --> 55:19.560]  Other than fraud and misrepresentation, which is still fraud,
[55:19.560 --> 55:25.560]  what do you think it is that's giving you a claim against the bank?
[55:25.560 --> 55:29.560]  That's like saying you asked me what I had for lunch and I didn't answer you,
[55:29.560 --> 55:34.560]  so you filed a lien against my house.
[55:34.560 --> 55:40.560]  Yeah.
[55:40.560 --> 55:49.560]  So what is in the contract that you're calling fraud that would have given you an estoppel against the bank for the loan?
[55:49.560 --> 55:55.560]  I don't have a particularly good answer other than the fact that at the time that this started seven years ago,
[55:55.560 --> 56:01.560]  I believed that it was a proper thing to do and I did it with the bank.
[56:01.560 --> 56:06.560]  That was the one I attempted to see if I could stand on that issue.
[56:06.560 --> 56:11.560]  Yeah, but again, let's go through a different scenario.
[56:11.560 --> 56:14.560]  You check out a book at the local library.
[56:14.560 --> 56:20.560]  You know that they have a five-day return policy on all books checked out of the library.
[56:20.560 --> 56:27.560]  You call on day seven and ask if you have to return the book
[56:27.560 --> 56:31.560]  and someone goes to look it up but no one gets back to you.
[56:31.560 --> 56:36.560]  And here it is seven years later and you're still wondering when they say,
[56:36.560 --> 56:44.560]  I want my book back if they have a case.
[56:44.560 --> 56:47.560]  Isn't that kind of what we're doing here?
[56:47.560 --> 56:49.560]  Yes.
[56:49.560 --> 56:53.560]  Isn't it sort of a self-proposying answer?
[56:53.560 --> 56:54.560]  Yes.
[56:54.560 --> 56:56.560]  They own the book, right?
[56:56.560 --> 56:57.560]  Yes.
[56:57.560 --> 57:01.560]  You didn't have a right to keep the book that long, right?
[57:01.560 --> 57:02.560]  Correct.
[57:02.560 --> 57:07.560]  So not only do you have to give them back the book, you got to pay the damn late fees, right?
[57:07.560 --> 57:08.560]  Right.
[57:08.560 --> 57:13.560]  There you go.
[57:13.560 --> 57:16.560]  Is there anywhere else we can take this conversation?
[57:16.560 --> 57:17.560]  No, there's not.
[57:17.560 --> 57:18.560]  I appreciate it.
[57:18.560 --> 57:19.560]  All right.
[57:19.560 --> 57:21.560]  Thanks for calling in, Scott.
[57:21.560 --> 57:22.560]  Thank you.
[57:22.560 --> 57:23.560]  Yep.
[57:23.560 --> 57:24.560]  All right.
[57:24.560 --> 57:27.560]  We have Tracy in Tennessee.
[57:27.560 --> 57:31.560]  Tracy, what can we do for you?
[57:31.560 --> 57:35.560]  Hey, well, I had a couple of questions.
[57:35.560 --> 57:43.560]  First would be whether or not you think that these municipalities have a pecuniary interest
[57:43.560 --> 57:51.560]  in the outcome of these proceedings and whether or not that pecuniary interest is in fact against
[57:51.560 --> 57:54.560]  any of the Ohio.
[57:54.560 --> 57:55.560]  Wait, wait, wait.
[57:55.560 --> 57:59.560]  You got to run that by me again after the break, okay?
[57:59.560 --> 58:00.560]  Okay.
[58:00.560 --> 58:04.560]  I want to make sure I thoroughly understand what you just asked me.
[58:04.560 --> 58:05.560]  Okay.
[58:05.560 --> 58:08.560]  Not what you asked me, but what you asked me.
[58:08.560 --> 58:11.560]  I want to make sure I got it, okay?
[58:11.560 --> 58:16.560]  So you hang on right there and we will pick this up when I get back, okay?
[58:16.560 --> 58:17.560]  All right.
[58:17.560 --> 58:24.560]  Folks, this is rule of law radio, the call in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:24.560 --> 58:29.560]  Gives the call, get in line and please try to make some sense.
[58:29.560 --> 58:50.560]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.560 --> 59:00.560]  All right.
[59:00.560 --> 59:27.560]  Thank you.
[59:27.560 --> 59:49.560]  Thank you.
[59:49.560 --> 01:00:17.560]  Thank you.
[01:00:17.560 --> 01:00:24.560]  Thank you.
[01:00:47.560 --> 01:00:55.560]  Thank you.
[01:01:17.560 --> 01:01:24.560]  Thank you.
[01:01:47.560 --> 01:02:03.560]  Thank you.
[01:02:03.560 --> 01:02:31.560]  Thank you.
[01:02:31.560 --> 01:02:53.560]  Thank you.
[01:02:53.560 --> 01:03:08.560]  Thank you.
[01:03:08.560 --> 01:03:19.560]  Thank you.
[01:03:19.560 --> 01:03:35.560]  Thank you.
[01:03:35.560 --> 01:03:36.560]  All right, folks.
[01:03:36.560 --> 01:03:37.560]  We are back.
[01:03:37.560 --> 01:03:39.560]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:03:39.560 --> 01:03:40.560]  Okay.
[01:03:40.560 --> 01:03:42.560]  We are talking with Tracy in Tennessee.
[01:03:42.560 --> 01:03:48.560]  All right, Tracy, ask that question again, please.
[01:03:48.560 --> 01:03:49.560]  Okay.
[01:03:49.560 --> 01:03:53.560]  All right.
[01:03:53.560 --> 01:04:03.560]  So I'm trying to confirm that the municipal judges here are paid from the municipality's
[01:04:03.560 --> 01:04:08.560]  general fund, which comes from all those traffic tickets.
[01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:12.560]  You're trying to learn if they are or you know that they are?
[01:04:12.560 --> 01:04:14.560]  I know that they are.
[01:04:14.560 --> 01:04:17.560]  You actually have documentation for that?
[01:04:17.560 --> 01:04:18.560]  Yeah.
[01:04:18.560 --> 01:04:20.560]  It's in the statute.
[01:04:20.560 --> 01:04:22.560]  Okay.
[01:04:22.560 --> 01:04:24.560]  So...
[01:04:24.560 --> 01:04:26.560]  That's a conflict of interest.
[01:04:26.560 --> 01:04:28.560]  That judge...
[01:04:28.560 --> 01:04:29.560]  I'm sorry.
[01:04:29.560 --> 01:04:30.560]  I'm sorry.
[01:04:30.560 --> 01:04:32.560]  That's a definite conflict of interest.
[01:04:32.560 --> 01:04:33.560]  Right.
[01:04:33.560 --> 01:04:38.560]  But I mean, that judge would have a personal pecuniary interest in violation of
[01:04:38.560 --> 01:04:42.560]  Jimmy B. Ohio, right?
[01:04:42.560 --> 01:04:47.560]  Well, I'm trying to recall all of what was into me, but if it deals with that issue,
[01:04:47.560 --> 01:04:50.560]  then probably yes.
[01:04:50.560 --> 01:04:53.560]  See, here's the way they do it in Texas.
[01:04:53.560 --> 01:04:59.560]  They don't pay the judges directly from the same money they take in the relation of the
[01:04:59.560 --> 01:05:03.560]  traffic tickets, but it's all just a big money laundering scheme.
[01:05:03.560 --> 01:05:05.560]  It doesn't matter what state you're in.
[01:05:05.560 --> 01:05:09.560]  You're just lucky to have something that says they do get paid directly from the same money
[01:05:09.560 --> 01:05:10.560]  they steal.
[01:05:10.560 --> 01:05:13.560]  So the more they steal, the more they get paid and the longer they're employed.
[01:05:13.560 --> 01:05:14.560]  Yay.
[01:05:14.560 --> 01:05:15.560]  You got proof.
[01:05:15.560 --> 01:05:18.560]  That's a definite conflict of interest to be challenged.
[01:05:18.560 --> 01:05:20.560]  Here in Texas, they shuffle the money around.
[01:05:20.560 --> 01:05:23.560]  They take the money they steal in the court.
[01:05:23.560 --> 01:05:29.560]  They put it in this account over here, but then their budget is offset by that amount
[01:05:29.560 --> 01:05:34.560]  in relation to what they can allocate from other funds to pay the judges.
[01:05:34.560 --> 01:05:41.560]  So basically, all the money they steal through traffic is used to offset the money they take
[01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:46.560]  from somewhere else to pay the judges because that money no longer has to be allocated
[01:05:46.560 --> 01:05:50.560]  in the budget and taken from other places.
[01:05:50.560 --> 01:05:52.560]  It's money laundering.
[01:05:52.560 --> 01:05:54.560]  There's no other way to put it.
[01:05:54.560 --> 01:05:59.560]  It's the exact same thing that all of these drug dealers and large corporations do with
[01:05:59.560 --> 01:06:01.560]  their dirty money.
[01:06:01.560 --> 01:06:03.560]  Same principle.
[01:06:03.560 --> 01:06:06.560]  Wash it through these little groups of accounts over here.
[01:06:06.560 --> 01:06:12.560]  By the time it gets back to this one, it's clean.
[01:06:12.560 --> 01:06:17.560]  So, yeah, if you've got actual proof that they're paid from the same money they steal,
[01:06:17.560 --> 01:06:19.560]  you've got a case for that.
[01:06:19.560 --> 01:06:23.560]  I'm not sure if Toomey's the one that'll back it up, but I'm sure you've read enough
[01:06:23.560 --> 01:06:27.560]  of it to see, to think so, or you wouldn't have mentioned it.
[01:06:27.560 --> 01:06:32.560]  Well, Toomey says, but it certainly violates the 14th Amendment.
[01:06:32.560 --> 01:06:36.560]  And the privacy defendant in a criminal case of due process of law.
[01:06:36.560 --> 01:06:38.560]  Oh, absolutely.
[01:06:38.560 --> 01:06:39.560]  But now here's the question.
[01:06:39.560 --> 01:06:42.560]  Are they criminal in Tennessee?
[01:06:42.560 --> 01:06:43.560]  Yeah.
[01:06:43.560 --> 01:06:44.560]  Okay.
[01:06:44.560 --> 01:06:45.560]  In Mississippi.
[01:06:45.560 --> 01:06:46.560]  Yeah.
[01:06:46.560 --> 01:06:51.560]  Then it's also a violation of the judicial cannons because any judge that has a
[01:06:51.560 --> 01:06:59.560]  relationship to one party or the other, and in this case, since the city itself is not
[01:06:59.560 --> 01:07:03.560]  an actual party, assuming that we're talking about a municipal judge here, right?
[01:07:03.560 --> 01:07:04.560]  Mm-hmm.
[01:07:04.560 --> 01:07:09.560]  Are the prosecutions brought in the name of the city or in the name of the state?
[01:07:09.560 --> 01:07:11.560]  In the city.
[01:07:11.560 --> 01:07:12.560]  No, no, no.
[01:07:12.560 --> 01:07:14.560]  Not where are they brought?
[01:07:14.560 --> 01:07:21.560]  On the complaint, does it say by the authority of the city or by the authority of the people
[01:07:21.560 --> 01:07:23.560]  of the state or the state of Tennessee?
[01:07:23.560 --> 01:07:25.560]  What does it say in the complaint?
[01:07:25.560 --> 01:07:30.560]  The uniformed traffic complaint, as it says, the state.
[01:07:30.560 --> 01:07:35.560]  But everything I'm receiving, docket, plea deals.
[01:07:35.560 --> 01:07:39.560]  Well, yeah, but that's all the court it's being held in.
[01:07:39.560 --> 01:07:44.560]  The thing is, is who is being identified as the party moving against you?
[01:07:44.560 --> 01:07:46.560]  Is it the municipality or the state?
[01:07:46.560 --> 01:07:48.560]  The city of Gunshouse.
[01:07:48.560 --> 01:07:49.560]  The city.
[01:07:49.560 --> 01:07:50.560]  Okay.
[01:07:50.560 --> 01:07:56.560]  So the actual case is the city of whatever versus you.
[01:07:56.560 --> 01:07:57.560]  Mm-hmm.
[01:07:57.560 --> 01:07:58.560]  Okay.
[01:07:58.560 --> 01:08:01.560]  Then you've got a conflict of interest case.
[01:08:01.560 --> 01:08:03.560]  You've got violations of the judicial cannons.
[01:08:03.560 --> 01:08:06.560]  You've got violation of due process.
[01:08:06.560 --> 01:08:12.560]  You've got violation of right to fair and impartial trial, a fair and unbiased judge.
[01:08:12.560 --> 01:08:15.560]  Yeah, you've definitely got a problem.
[01:08:15.560 --> 01:08:19.560]  Yeah, Mississippi's tore up.
[01:08:19.560 --> 01:08:27.560]  Also, I believe in the statute, it also says that the municipalities actually get,
[01:08:27.560 --> 01:08:30.560]  like, 50% of these tickets.
[01:08:30.560 --> 01:08:32.560]  It says the same thing here.
[01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:36.560]  In Texas, now see, here's the thing.
[01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:42.560]  In Texas, the statute says that 50% goes to the state, 50% goes to the municipality
[01:08:42.560 --> 01:08:45.560]  or the county if it's in a JP court.
[01:08:45.560 --> 01:08:50.560]  However, the statute specifically limits what they can use that money for,
[01:08:50.560 --> 01:08:52.560]  which is road and bridge.
[01:08:52.560 --> 01:08:53.560]  Okay?
[01:08:53.560 --> 01:08:54.560]  But that's what I was saying.
[01:08:54.560 --> 01:08:55.560]  Not fair.
[01:08:55.560 --> 01:08:58.560]  The money goes into the road and bridge account.
[01:08:58.560 --> 01:09:06.560]  But that means that whatever money goes into road and bridge doesn't have to come out of the general fund to augment road and bridge.
[01:09:06.560 --> 01:09:12.560]  That money can then be used to pay the judges to steal more money to go into road and bridge.
[01:09:12.560 --> 01:09:17.560]  So they can use that excess budget money that is saved somewhere else.
[01:09:17.560 --> 01:09:20.560]  That's money laundering.
[01:09:20.560 --> 01:09:22.560]  That's exactly what it is.
[01:09:22.560 --> 01:09:28.560]  And it's what they're doing.
[01:09:28.560 --> 01:09:32.560]  So you see, even if they say put it in an account over here, it can't go right back into your own pockets.
[01:09:32.560 --> 01:09:34.560]  It doesn't matter.
[01:09:34.560 --> 01:09:47.560]  The city is saving that money for some other purpose out of its general fund because of the money that went into that account.
[01:09:47.560 --> 01:09:53.560]  So it doesn't change anything in the reality.
[01:09:53.560 --> 01:10:07.560]  All right. Well, the only other thing that I'd like to bring up is I was reading up on injunctions and from my understanding, in order to move for a permanent injunction,
[01:10:07.560 --> 01:10:11.560]  you have to first move for a preliminary injunction.
[01:10:11.560 --> 01:10:20.560]  But is my understanding incorrect as far as your knowledge or can you move for a permanent injunction without the preliminary?
[01:10:20.560 --> 01:10:22.560]  It depends.
[01:10:22.560 --> 01:10:26.560]  It depends on what you're asking to have the injunction issued for.
[01:10:26.560 --> 01:10:36.560]  If it's a state function, the preliminary is there to give the other side a chance to come up and respond as to why it shouldn't be granted.
[01:10:36.560 --> 01:10:40.560]  Okay.
[01:10:40.560 --> 01:10:56.560]  The first issue is the no rules for challenging misdemeanor traffic tickets, no rules, no procedure, no nothing in Mississippi.
[01:10:56.560 --> 01:11:01.560]  So I want to erase that issue. Also, I'm going to erase the issue of...
[01:11:01.560 --> 01:11:06.560]  No legal remedy.
[01:11:06.560 --> 01:11:19.560]  Okay. And the other issue is the fact that the Attorney General's mission for public safety were bound with the duty to prescribe these uniform traffic tickets
[01:11:19.560 --> 01:11:23.560]  and that these uniform traffic tickets shall constitute a complaint.
[01:11:23.560 --> 01:11:26.560]  But they set out no facts.
[01:11:26.560 --> 01:11:29.560]  They don't contain any essential elements.
[01:11:29.560 --> 01:11:32.560]  They're not as specific as an indictment, blah, blah, blah.
[01:11:32.560 --> 01:11:35.560]  They do not constitute criminal complaints.
[01:11:35.560 --> 01:11:40.560]  And they allege federal code.
[01:11:40.560 --> 01:11:51.560]  Yeah, which is exactly what limits their jurisdictional application to commercial because it's the only place a federal law can reach within the state is the Commerce Clause.
[01:11:51.560 --> 01:11:57.560]  Exactly. It's either that or it is Dred Scott. It's the resurrection of the Dred Scott decision.
[01:11:57.560 --> 01:12:01.560]  And I'm going to put that in there, too, in the federal court.
[01:12:01.560 --> 01:12:06.560]  But so I guess the preliminary...
[01:12:06.560 --> 01:12:12.560]  I was stuck on whether it needs to be, you know, two separate issues, like two separate injunctions.
[01:12:12.560 --> 01:12:17.560]  One for the preliminary aspect of, you know, the judge...
[01:12:17.560 --> 01:12:22.560]  It's been 20 days since I went to court and the judge said I don't have jurisdiction.
[01:12:22.560 --> 01:12:26.560]  And so you give me jurisdiction, prosecutor.
[01:12:26.560 --> 01:12:36.560]  So, surprisingly, the prosecutor is supposed to be getting this judge jurisdiction by going and writing another...or Asa David.
[01:12:36.560 --> 01:12:39.560]  But I really don't think he's going to do that.
[01:12:39.560 --> 01:12:46.560]  But the fact is, it is said that it's going to happen.
[01:12:46.560 --> 01:12:51.560]  So that needs to be under a...
[01:12:51.560 --> 01:12:53.560]  Go in the house.
[01:12:53.560 --> 01:12:56.560]  The thing is, that's the way it's supposed to be.
[01:12:56.560 --> 01:13:01.560]  The moving party is the one that has to show that the court hearing the matter has jurisdiction.
[01:13:01.560 --> 01:13:10.560]  That's exactly why in a federal lawsuit there has to be a statement in there about why that federal court has jurisdiction over this issue.
[01:13:10.560 --> 01:13:13.560]  It's no different in the criminal cases.
[01:13:13.560 --> 01:13:21.560]  I would say that they had jurisdiction over the issues because they are alleging federal code on the ticket, you know,
[01:13:21.560 --> 01:13:29.560]  and then coming into court and merely reciting state penalty statute and saying, oh, well, actually, you're...you breached this,
[01:13:29.560 --> 01:13:31.560]  but we don't have to have that.
[01:13:31.560 --> 01:13:42.560]  If they're citing federal code and you've got the complaint to prove it, you have the power to remove it to federal court.
[01:13:42.560 --> 01:13:47.560]  Would you say that we should remove it or preliminary...
[01:13:47.560 --> 01:13:51.560]  You file a removal. They are citing federal law.
[01:13:51.560 --> 01:13:55.560]  That puts it squarely within the realm of federal jurisdiction.
[01:13:55.560 --> 01:13:58.560]  File a removal to federal court.
[01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:01.560]  The state is citing federal law.
[01:14:01.560 --> 01:14:05.560]  All right, let's go talk to the feds about it.
[01:14:05.560 --> 01:14:11.560]  Okay, and I can raise up...I can raise every issue on a removal that I could deal with.
[01:14:11.560 --> 01:14:12.560]  Absolutely.
[01:14:12.560 --> 01:14:13.560]  No rules, nothing.
[01:14:13.560 --> 01:14:14.560]  Okay.
[01:14:14.560 --> 01:14:15.560]  All right.
[01:14:15.560 --> 01:14:17.560]  The removal...wait a minute now.
[01:14:17.560 --> 01:14:19.560]  The removal is very short and sweet.
[01:14:19.560 --> 01:14:28.560]  All you have to do is state why the removal is occurring, why the federal court has jurisdiction of it, and that's it.
[01:14:28.560 --> 01:14:29.560]  Okay?
[01:14:29.560 --> 01:14:36.560]  After that, then when you get into the case of defending the information in the statute that they're citing,
[01:14:36.560 --> 01:14:40.560]  that's when you can beat the crap out of them and the rest of it.
[01:14:40.560 --> 01:14:42.560]  Okay.
[01:14:42.560 --> 01:14:45.560]  All right. Well, that sounds good.
[01:14:45.560 --> 01:14:48.560]  That means I could probably get that in pretty quickly.
[01:14:48.560 --> 01:14:49.560]  Yeah.
[01:14:49.560 --> 01:14:51.560]  I mean, the removal is very short and sweet.
[01:14:51.560 --> 01:14:55.560]  Now, be aware they're going to turn around and try to get it remanded back,
[01:14:55.560 --> 01:14:59.560]  but the problem is they're citing federal law.
[01:14:59.560 --> 01:15:03.560]  And there's case law that very clearly says, as your motion shows,
[01:15:03.560 --> 01:15:11.560]  that they cannot cite punitive-only statutes.
[01:15:11.560 --> 01:15:12.560]  Okay?
[01:15:12.560 --> 01:15:13.560]  They've got to cite something else.
[01:15:13.560 --> 01:15:20.560]  So if the state is just trying to cite a punishment statute for an offense under federal law,
[01:15:20.560 --> 01:15:23.560]  they can't stand on that.
[01:15:23.560 --> 01:15:30.560]  Well, what they are, they're AANVA dictionary codes for convictions and withdrawals.
[01:15:30.560 --> 01:15:39.560]  And the AANVA was contracted with the NDR, which is under the Department of Transportation, which is commerce.
[01:15:39.560 --> 01:15:40.560]  Right.
[01:15:40.560 --> 01:15:46.560]  And the feds are going to agree with you because that's all their code is if they're citing.
[01:15:46.560 --> 01:15:49.560]  If they're citing federal codes relating to these charges,
[01:15:49.560 --> 01:15:52.560]  then the feds are going to kick them right in the teeth and say,
[01:15:52.560 --> 01:15:56.560]  look, all of our codes are commercial.
[01:15:56.560 --> 01:15:59.560]  And she's arguing that point right here.
[01:15:59.560 --> 01:16:02.560]  And you're trying to charge her with those same laws right here.
[01:16:02.560 --> 01:16:04.560]  She's arguing it correctly.
[01:16:04.560 --> 01:16:09.560]  What the hell are you idiots taking?
[01:16:09.560 --> 01:16:10.560]  All right.
[01:16:10.560 --> 01:16:17.560]  Which one of you has the open bar in the damn legislature that you think this is reasonable?
[01:16:17.560 --> 01:16:20.560]  All right.
[01:16:20.560 --> 01:16:22.560]  That's right.
[01:16:22.560 --> 01:16:28.560]  If they had to prove each fact to the essential elements of all the state-defined charges in every single state,
[01:16:28.560 --> 01:16:31.560]  and all 50 states, they would fail on their fate.
[01:16:31.560 --> 01:16:32.560]  Absolutely.
[01:16:32.560 --> 01:16:41.560]  And if they knew the essential elements of the terms within these state-defined charges, they could stick their butt.
[01:16:41.560 --> 01:16:43.560]  Because it's all commercial.
[01:16:43.560 --> 01:16:44.560]  But all right.
[01:16:44.560 --> 01:16:46.560]  Well, I'll let you go, Eddie.
[01:16:46.560 --> 01:16:47.560]  Okay.
[01:16:47.560 --> 01:16:48.560]  Thanks for calling in, Tracy.
[01:16:48.560 --> 01:16:49.560]  All right.
[01:16:49.560 --> 01:16:50.560]  Thank you.
[01:16:50.560 --> 01:16:51.560]  Yes, ma'am.
[01:16:51.560 --> 01:16:52.560]  All right, folks.
[01:16:52.560 --> 01:16:53.560]  We will be right back after this break.
[01:16:53.560 --> 01:17:00.560]  So y'all hang on and we'll get to Charles and Washington.
[01:17:00.560 --> 01:17:07.560]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:31.560 --> 01:17:34.560]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:34.560 --> 01:17:37.560]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:37.560 --> 01:17:43.560]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.560 --> 01:17:44.560]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.560 --> 01:17:45.560]  No.
[01:17:45.560 --> 01:17:47.560]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.560 --> 01:17:48.560]  No.
[01:17:48.560 --> 01:17:49.560]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:50.560]  No.
[01:17:50.560 --> 01:17:51.560]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:52.560]  Wow.
[01:17:52.560 --> 01:17:54.560]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.560 --> 01:17:55.560]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.560 --> 01:17:56.560]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.560 --> 01:17:58.560]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.560 --> 01:18:00.560]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:18:29.560 --> 01:18:33.560]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:33.560 --> 01:18:38.560]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.560 --> 01:18:40.560]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:40.560 --> 01:18:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[01:18:46.560 --> 01:18:49.560]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.560 --> 01:18:57.560]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.560 --> 01:19:00.560]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:28.560 --> 01:19:31.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:31.560 --> 01:19:33.560]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:19:33.560 --> 01:19:38.560]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:19:38.560 --> 01:19:41.560]  Charles is the only person I got up on the board right this second.
[01:19:41.560 --> 01:19:45.560]  So if anybody else wants to call and get in line and get ready to talk, then please do so.
[01:19:45.560 --> 01:19:48.560]  All right, Charles, what can we do for you?
[01:19:48.560 --> 01:19:49.560]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:19:49.560 --> 01:19:50.560]  How you doing?
[01:19:50.560 --> 01:19:53.560]  Again, I want to say thank you for the information that you sent me.
[01:19:53.560 --> 01:19:57.560]  It was information that you sent a little over a year ago when I first started calling you.
[01:19:57.560 --> 01:20:01.560]  And I didn't realize I actually had that when you had been turning it all along.
[01:20:01.560 --> 01:20:02.560]  You had sent it.
[01:20:02.560 --> 01:20:06.560]  These statutes for Washington are no driver's license, no registration.
[01:20:06.560 --> 01:20:12.560]  So I looked over there and it was good that I did again because it had also no insurance.
[01:20:12.560 --> 01:20:20.560]  The question I have for you guys is I have my court date, my first hearing coming up on the 25th of May.
[01:20:20.560 --> 01:20:25.560]  And I know you're supposed to submit some information like tools prior.
[01:20:25.560 --> 01:20:28.560]  And what I was calling about is there's any way to possibly submit.
[01:20:28.560 --> 01:20:33.560]  And I have to get someone to draft that information up for me in the legal form because before when I did that,
[01:20:33.560 --> 01:20:39.560]  they said they wouldn't accept it because it wasn't done in the form which they accustomed to having done.
[01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:44.560]  They cannot reject a process pleading based on form.
[01:20:44.560 --> 01:20:47.560]  There's Supreme Court case law on that.
[01:20:47.560 --> 01:20:49.560]  Really?
[01:20:49.560 --> 01:20:56.560]  Prison inmates can write the dabbling thing in chocolate bar if they have to on a roll of toilet paper.
[01:20:56.560 --> 01:20:58.560]  And the judge has to take it.
[01:20:58.560 --> 01:21:03.560]  He may not be able to make sense out of it, but he has to take it.
[01:21:03.560 --> 01:21:04.560]  All right.
[01:21:04.560 --> 01:21:09.560]  What I sent you to because I'm seeing a document that I had that I submitted that another gentleman had wrote in Seattle.
[01:21:09.560 --> 01:21:18.560]  There's two cases that were sold out because one was an old document going way back to the whole beginning of the territory and all of that,
[01:21:18.560 --> 01:21:21.560]  which I couldn't quite get into it, but I'd like to send that to you.
[01:21:21.560 --> 01:21:27.560]  I sent that to them and they sent it back sending that to be in another form rather than just dismiss it.
[01:21:27.560 --> 01:21:33.560]  So my question to you is since I have this orientation coming up on the first part of the trial,
[01:21:33.560 --> 01:21:38.560]  am I able to draft up a motion to have this thing dismissed based on the information that you've already submitted to me?
[01:21:38.560 --> 01:21:43.560]  You need to have it to be dismissed based upon something specific.
[01:21:43.560 --> 01:21:47.560]  In this case, subject matter and personal jurisdiction.
[01:21:47.560 --> 01:21:53.560]  Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter and impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:21:53.560 --> 01:21:55.560]  This is a commercial statute.
[01:21:55.560 --> 01:21:58.560]  I was never engaged in commercial use of the highways.
[01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:02.560]  I was not operating a motor vehicle as that is a commercial use item.
[01:22:02.560 --> 01:22:04.560]  I was not engaging in commerce.
[01:22:04.560 --> 01:22:08.560]  Therefore, there is no nexus with commerce in order to be in transportation.
[01:22:08.560 --> 01:22:15.560]  Therefore, there is no nexus in commerce for me to be classified as a driver, operator or carrier for said purposes.
[01:22:15.560 --> 01:22:20.560]  The court lacks subject matter and impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:22:20.560 --> 01:22:23.560]  Impersonal jurisdiction and that's what I want to ask you.
[01:22:23.560 --> 01:22:27.560]  So when I draft this up, I'll write this up.
[01:22:27.560 --> 01:22:31.560]  It's got to be based exactly what you just said and I submit that.
[01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:36.560]  Well, there'll be a little more than that, but yeah, you'll be going down the list on those issues.
[01:22:36.560 --> 01:22:38.560]  Commercial, commercial, commercial.
[01:22:38.560 --> 01:22:39.560]  I'm not in commercial.
[01:22:39.560 --> 01:22:40.560]  Never was in commercial.
[01:22:40.560 --> 01:22:41.560]  Wouldn't do anything commercial.
[01:22:41.560 --> 01:22:43.560]  Don't have a car for commercial purposes.
[01:22:43.560 --> 01:22:46.560]  Therefore, it's not a motor vehicle under your code.
[01:22:46.560 --> 01:22:50.560]  Therefore, no license is acquired under your code.
[01:22:50.560 --> 01:22:52.560]  So again, you said there'd be a little bit more than that.
[01:22:52.560 --> 01:23:01.560]  The first time I went there before, I challenged subject matter jurisdiction and I took in a form to show that I had no contracts with the state doing business under contract.
[01:23:01.560 --> 01:23:02.560]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:02.560 --> 01:23:05.560]  What do you mean you took a form showing you had no contracts?
[01:23:05.560 --> 01:23:06.560]  What?
[01:23:06.560 --> 01:23:15.560]  How do you show, how do you prove a negative by filing something that doesn't exist?
[01:23:15.560 --> 01:23:16.560]  Well, that's what I did.
[01:23:16.560 --> 01:23:22.560]  I went on this website with the Secretary of State where you registered it.
[01:23:22.560 --> 01:23:23.560]  No.
[01:23:23.560 --> 01:23:29.560]  You're making this way, way more complicated than you have to, Charles.
[01:23:29.560 --> 01:23:43.560]  Okay, there's this thing called an affidavit that you sign in front of a notary under penalty of perjury that says, I was never engaged in any commercial use of the highways.
[01:23:43.560 --> 01:23:47.560]  I was traveling biologically from my own personal business and pleasure.
[01:23:47.560 --> 01:23:50.560]  I was not operating a motor vehicle for commerce.
[01:23:50.560 --> 01:23:56.560]  I was not acting in the legal capacity of a driver, operator or carer for the purpose of engaging in commerce.
[01:23:56.560 --> 01:24:05.560]  I was at all times acting entirely privately in my common law capacity, period.
[01:24:05.560 --> 01:24:08.560]  You have a seminar material, do you not?
[01:24:08.560 --> 01:24:12.560]  No, I just got all the information from her.
[01:24:12.560 --> 01:24:13.560]  I got sick.
[01:24:13.560 --> 01:24:15.560]  I thought I had a heart attack.
[01:24:15.560 --> 01:24:19.560]  So they've been put me through a lot of tests for some other stuff I had to deal with.
[01:24:19.560 --> 01:24:26.560]  So my thing to do tonight was to go on to that because my friend had the information that you had sent her.
[01:24:26.560 --> 01:24:29.560]  So she told me that you had it and I looked up when I said this is what it is.
[01:24:29.560 --> 01:24:34.560]  I need to go back at it at tonight to get that seminar information because you told me how to find it.
[01:24:34.560 --> 01:24:36.560]  So that's what I was going to do tonight.
[01:24:36.560 --> 01:24:41.560]  But let me call Eddie first and find out if in the seminar information that I'm...
[01:24:41.560 --> 01:24:45.560]  There's a not in transportation affidavit in the seminar.
[01:24:45.560 --> 01:24:47.560]  Several, in fact.
[01:24:47.560 --> 01:24:49.560]  Okay.
[01:24:49.560 --> 01:24:54.560]  So when I once I read over the seminar, I know how to go ahead and should be able...
[01:24:54.560 --> 01:24:57.560]  The seminar is organized into folders.
[01:24:57.560 --> 01:25:04.560]  The folders are organized according to stage of proceedings as to how things should progress.
[01:25:04.560 --> 01:25:11.560]  And so you will find it according to what stage you're in as to what document you're wanting to start with.
[01:25:11.560 --> 01:25:12.560]  All right.
[01:25:12.560 --> 01:25:16.560]  That's the question I call to ask you because all the stuff you just said earlier,
[01:25:16.560 --> 01:25:18.560]  that's what I was going to draft up.
[01:25:18.560 --> 01:25:23.560]  I was going to go back to the archives and hopefully that'd be up in time for me to do that on what you said.
[01:25:23.560 --> 01:25:29.560]  But you're saying if I go to the seminar portion, there are stages or files as RAP set for the different...
[01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:30.560]  No, not if you...
[01:25:30.560 --> 01:25:32.560]  There is no seminar portion.
[01:25:32.560 --> 01:25:34.560]  The seminar is something you have to purchase and download.
[01:25:34.560 --> 01:25:39.560]  Once you've done that, the seminar has all of the documents in Word...
[01:25:39.560 --> 01:25:45.560]  Microsoft Word format, which you can use OpenOffice to open as long as you're using the current version of OpenOffice.
[01:25:45.560 --> 01:25:49.560]  Okay.
[01:25:49.560 --> 01:25:52.560]  And so that's something you have to purchase off of the website.
[01:25:52.560 --> 01:25:56.560]  It's not something that's just there to be accessed.
[01:25:56.560 --> 01:25:57.560]  Okay.
[01:25:57.560 --> 01:25:59.560]  And I understood because I remember a year ago you said that you...
[01:25:59.560 --> 01:26:00.560]  You offered that.
[01:26:00.560 --> 01:26:01.560]  And there was a certain fee.
[01:26:01.560 --> 01:26:03.560]  I didn't remember how much it was, but it don't matter just why.
[01:26:03.560 --> 01:26:07.560]  I wanted to get it because I didn't know if I was ever able to get it because I missed it,
[01:26:07.560 --> 01:26:09.560]  but you told me last time I can't get that.
[01:26:09.560 --> 01:26:10.560]  Okay.
[01:26:10.560 --> 01:26:11.560]  Well, you answered the question.
[01:26:11.560 --> 01:26:12.560]  I needed that.
[01:26:12.560 --> 01:26:20.560]  So I just got to get that seminar, purchase that seminar, and go through those files and draft this thing up based upon the affidavit that you told me
[01:26:20.560 --> 01:26:23.560]  and the statements that you told me since I talked with you tonight.
[01:26:23.560 --> 01:26:24.560]  Right.
[01:26:24.560 --> 01:26:26.560]  Just put that through there before the two weeks.
[01:26:26.560 --> 01:26:27.560]  Right.
[01:26:27.560 --> 01:26:28.560]  Okay.
[01:26:28.560 --> 01:26:29.560]  Well, good.
[01:26:29.560 --> 01:26:30.560]  I hope you guys are with.
[01:26:30.560 --> 01:26:31.560]  And again, I appreciate you.
[01:26:31.560 --> 01:26:33.560]  I mean, I had a birthday party itself.
[01:26:33.560 --> 01:26:34.560]  I wasn't going to miss you for that.
[01:26:34.560 --> 01:26:36.560]  So I'm going to get that straight because that's coming up.
[01:26:36.560 --> 01:26:38.560]  But again, I appreciate it, Eddie.
[01:26:38.560 --> 01:26:39.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:26:39.560 --> 01:26:40.560]  Keep kicking back.
[01:26:40.560 --> 01:26:41.560]  Thank you.
[01:26:41.560 --> 01:26:42.560]  Good night.
[01:26:42.560 --> 01:26:43.560]  You too.
[01:26:43.560 --> 01:26:44.560]  Bye-bye.
[01:26:44.560 --> 01:26:45.560]  Bye-bye.
[01:26:45.560 --> 01:26:46.560]  All right.
[01:26:46.560 --> 01:26:47.560]  Now we have Brett in Texas.
[01:26:47.560 --> 01:26:52.560]  Brett, what can we do for you?
[01:26:52.560 --> 01:26:58.560]  Hello, Brett.
[01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:01.560]  Brett, going once, going twice.
[01:27:01.560 --> 01:27:02.560]  Hey.
[01:27:02.560 --> 01:27:03.560]  Hey.
[01:27:03.560 --> 01:27:05.560]  Sorry about that.
[01:27:05.560 --> 01:27:09.560]  I had you on mute while I was listening to the other caller, so I apologize.
[01:27:09.560 --> 01:27:10.560]  No worries.
[01:27:10.560 --> 01:27:18.560]  So I have not a particular law question on my mind as much as I just wanted to call it,
[01:27:18.560 --> 01:27:19.560]  and thank you.
[01:27:19.560 --> 01:27:25.560]  Eddie, you, well, I really appreciate your giving so much of yourself in this way.
[01:27:25.560 --> 01:27:30.560]  I know it might be frustrating to get times that everybody's not able to go where you're
[01:27:30.560 --> 01:27:35.560]  going, but man, you're a pioneer, and I really appreciate how you're leading the way.
[01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:40.560]  You're shining the light on the pathway so that people can take another step in the direction
[01:27:40.560 --> 01:27:46.560]  that they need to instead of following all this nonsense that's so loud all around us,
[01:27:46.560 --> 01:27:51.560]  and you're showing us how to read the codes, and you're showing us how to connect the dots,
[01:27:51.560 --> 01:27:56.560]  and there's just, there's just nobody else doing this, and thank you so much.
[01:27:56.560 --> 01:28:03.560]  Now, after, you know, being so many years of knowing that something's wrong and feeling
[01:28:03.560 --> 01:28:10.560]  bad, if I just bow up to it enough, and somebody will, it can somehow be right, and being so
[01:28:10.560 --> 01:28:18.560]  frustrated that there's no way to get remedy, and then you start showing us, me, you know,
[01:28:18.560 --> 01:28:24.560]  I can, I guess, only speak for myself, but well, man, my father as well, I can speak for
[01:28:24.560 --> 01:28:32.560]  him, because what you're showing us is ways that actually can have some effect.
[01:28:32.560 --> 01:28:39.560]  Ways that are rooted in the statutes and rooted in the constitution, and things that actually
[01:28:39.560 --> 01:28:43.560]  they make sense instead of just all those theories.
[01:28:43.560 --> 01:28:47.560]  I'm a big believer in being able to connect the dots.
[01:28:47.560 --> 01:28:53.560]  You can't see the picture, most of, at least not clearly, until the dots are all connected,
[01:28:53.560 --> 01:28:59.560]  and when you have dots that aren't connected, it just doesn't look right.
[01:28:59.560 --> 01:29:08.560]  Yeah, well, I've gone from frustrated and powerless to finally feeling like I know how
[01:29:08.560 --> 01:29:14.560]  to respond with what documents I need to hold people accountable, at least to some extent.
[01:29:14.560 --> 01:29:18.560]  I still haven't learned how to do a lawsuit, and I think that's going to be powerful too.
[01:29:18.560 --> 01:29:25.560]  But a lot of these things, they're so prolific with their errors, and it gives you a lot
[01:29:25.560 --> 01:29:32.560]  of fodder to work with, and to the point where I feel like, because of you, I can respond
[01:29:32.560 --> 01:29:34.560]  properly and hold them accountable.
[01:29:34.560 --> 01:29:35.560]  Well, I appreciate it.
[01:29:35.560 --> 01:29:37.560]  That's that pioneer comment.
[01:29:37.560 --> 01:29:41.560]  There are times when I feel like Will Gears character out of Jeremiah Johnson.
[01:29:41.560 --> 01:29:46.560]  I've been in these mountains 30 years, and I want to tell you, I've never been lost.
[01:29:46.560 --> 01:29:50.560]  I've been confused for a month or two, but I ain't never been lost.
[01:29:50.560 --> 01:29:55.560]  Now, hang on just a second, we'll finish this up on the other side, all right?
[01:29:55.560 --> 01:30:21.560]  Folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on.
[01:30:21.560 --> 01:30:49.560]  Here's a tale of a sweet, an apple tree, and a moose.
[01:30:49.560 --> 01:30:54.560]  It begins with Per Johansson of Saro, Sweden, who heard a roar one night from his neighbor's
[01:30:54.560 --> 01:30:55.560]  yard.
[01:30:55.560 --> 01:31:00.560]  With his neighbor on vacation, Johansson crept next door, where he spied a full-grown moose,
[01:31:00.560 --> 01:31:05.560]  dangling from the branches of an apple tree, apparently tipsy on fermented apples.
[01:31:05.560 --> 01:31:10.560]  So what do you do when you see bullwinkle drunk as a skunk in your neighbor's tree?
[01:31:10.560 --> 01:31:15.560]  Johansson got a buzzsaw, not to harm the critter, but just to cut enough branches till the moose
[01:31:15.560 --> 01:31:16.560]  came crashing down.
[01:31:16.560 --> 01:31:19.560]  We still don't know how he got up there.
[01:31:19.560 --> 01:31:21.560]  I'll leave that to your imagination.
[01:31:21.560 --> 01:31:30.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.560 --> 01:31:31.560]  I lost my son.
[01:31:31.560 --> 01:31:32.560]  My nephew.
[01:31:32.560 --> 01:31:33.560]  My uncle.
[01:31:33.560 --> 01:31:34.560]  My son.
[01:31:34.560 --> 01:31:35.560]  On September 11, 2001.
[01:31:35.560 --> 01:31:39.560]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.560 --> 01:31:43.560]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.560 --> 01:31:47.560]  The official exclamation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:31:47.560 --> 01:31:52.560]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[01:31:52.560 --> 01:31:53.560]  to the story.
[01:31:53.560 --> 01:31:54.560]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:55.560]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.560 --> 01:31:56.560]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.560 --> 01:31:57.560]  My son.
[01:31:57.560 --> 01:31:58.560]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:58.560 --> 01:32:00.560]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.560 --> 01:32:03.560]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.560 --> 01:32:06.560]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.560 --> 01:32:10.560]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:11.560]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.560 --> 01:32:14.560]  I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.560 --> 01:32:18.560]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.560 --> 01:32:21.560]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.560 --> 01:32:26.560]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero
[01:32:26.560 --> 01:32:27.560]  complaints.
[01:32:27.560 --> 01:32:31.560]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:32.560]  first time.
[01:32:32.560 --> 01:32:38.560]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.560 --> 01:32:43.560]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio
[01:32:43.560 --> 01:32:45.560]  Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:50.560]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:50.560 --> 01:32:56.560]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.560 --> 01:32:58.560]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.560 --> 01:33:01.560]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.560 --> 01:33:10.560]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.560 --> 01:34:00.560]  All right, folks.
[01:34:00.560 --> 01:34:01.560]  We are back.
[01:34:01.560 --> 01:34:03.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:03.560 --> 01:34:06.560]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:34:06.560 --> 01:34:08.560]  We got a half an hour left in the show.
[01:34:08.560 --> 01:34:12.560]  That is two segments for the you initiates out there that haven't been listening that
[01:34:12.560 --> 01:34:13.560]  long.
[01:34:13.560 --> 01:34:14.560]  Half an hour.
[01:34:14.560 --> 01:34:16.560]  So y'all hang on just a minute.
[01:34:16.560 --> 01:34:17.560]  All right, Brett.
[01:34:17.560 --> 01:34:18.560]  Let's see if we can wrap this up here.
[01:34:18.560 --> 01:34:19.560]  What you got?
[01:34:19.560 --> 01:34:20.560]  Let's finish up.
[01:34:20.560 --> 01:34:21.560]  Okay.
[01:34:21.560 --> 01:34:27.560]  Well, if you don't have any other caller, I could put some questions in there.
[01:34:27.560 --> 01:34:28.560]  I do.
[01:34:28.560 --> 01:34:32.560]  If you have a question, then let's see what we can do with it.
[01:34:32.560 --> 01:34:33.560]  Okay.
[01:34:33.560 --> 01:34:34.560]  Well, if I have...
[01:34:34.560 --> 01:34:40.560]  I do have some warrants for my arrest for this driving while licensed in Valley.
[01:34:40.560 --> 01:34:46.560]  And I don't know how to get those lifted in a city where...
[01:34:46.560 --> 01:34:47.560]  Get what?
[01:34:47.560 --> 01:34:48.560]  Listed.
[01:34:48.560 --> 01:34:49.560]  What do you mean, listed?
[01:34:49.560 --> 01:34:50.560]  Listed?
[01:34:50.560 --> 01:34:52.560]  I mean removed or...
[01:34:52.560 --> 01:34:53.560]  Oh, lifted.
[01:34:53.560 --> 01:34:54.560]  Okay.
[01:34:54.560 --> 01:34:55.560]  I'm sorry.
[01:34:55.560 --> 01:34:56.560]  I thought you said listed.
[01:34:56.560 --> 01:35:03.560]  Oh, no, I mean to nullify the warrants or make them to where they don't appear on every
[01:35:03.560 --> 01:35:06.560]  peace officer's screen in the world where I...
[01:35:06.560 --> 01:35:07.560]  Well, there's two ways.
[01:35:07.560 --> 01:35:09.560]  To just go to the grocery store.
[01:35:09.560 --> 01:35:10.560]  There's two ways.
[01:35:10.560 --> 01:35:13.560]  One is to appear at the court that issued them and...
[01:35:13.560 --> 01:35:14.560]  Right.
[01:35:14.560 --> 01:35:17.560]  In which case the warrant is fulfilled.
[01:35:17.560 --> 01:35:18.560]  Right.
[01:35:18.560 --> 01:35:20.560]  So why were they issued?
[01:35:20.560 --> 01:35:22.560]  I'm scared to do that.
[01:35:22.560 --> 01:35:23.560]  Why were they issued?
[01:35:23.560 --> 01:35:29.560]  Well, a particular court has demonstrated themselves as willing to...
[01:35:29.560 --> 01:35:36.560]  A friend of mine went down there to this same municipal court to deal with his traffic ticket.
[01:35:36.560 --> 01:35:41.560]  And instead of lifting the warrant, they just chased him down afterwards.
[01:35:41.560 --> 01:35:43.560]  They followed him out of there and then they threw him in jail.
[01:35:43.560 --> 01:35:45.560]  He was in there for six months.
[01:35:45.560 --> 01:35:47.560]  I don't want to go through that.
[01:35:47.560 --> 01:35:48.560]  I'll lose my job.
[01:35:48.560 --> 01:35:53.560]  How did they throw him in jail for six months on a municipal warrant?
[01:35:53.560 --> 01:35:55.560]  I don't know how they pulled it off.
[01:35:55.560 --> 01:35:57.560]  It doesn't make sense to me.
[01:35:57.560 --> 01:36:06.560]  Well, it makes no sense at all considering municipalities don't have a rest authority for warrants as far as throwing you in jail goes.
[01:36:06.560 --> 01:36:07.560]  Yeah.
[01:36:07.560 --> 01:36:16.560]  Well, what they got in for when they chased him down, I guess, had they been something, but they got it for turning right without using his blinker.
[01:36:16.560 --> 01:36:22.560]  He came up to a right turn only lane, pulled up to the intersection there and stopped.
[01:36:22.560 --> 01:36:28.560]  And then when he continued on to the right, they grabbed him because he didn't use his blinker.
[01:36:28.560 --> 01:36:29.560]  I don't know.
[01:36:29.560 --> 01:36:34.560]  It's just that was their way of just having a reason to get him again.
[01:36:34.560 --> 01:36:36.560]  And so they turned out they didn't lift the warrants.
[01:36:36.560 --> 01:36:38.560]  I don't want to go through all that stuff.
[01:36:38.560 --> 01:36:45.560]  I want to find a way that doesn't involve me setting foot in there on what they consider their turf.
[01:36:45.560 --> 01:36:57.560]  Well, unless you can give the court a good reason to withdraw the warrant, which you can file a motion demanding they do, but that's not going to happen.
[01:36:57.560 --> 01:36:58.560]  Why?
[01:36:58.560 --> 01:37:00.560]  You didn't answer my question though.
[01:37:00.560 --> 01:37:03.560]  Why were the warrants issued?
[01:37:03.560 --> 01:37:06.560]  Oh, you mean for me or my friend?
[01:37:06.560 --> 01:37:08.560]  Well, we're talking about you, right?
[01:37:08.560 --> 01:37:11.560]  You didn't ask me how to keep your friend from out of jail and get rid of his warrants.
[01:37:11.560 --> 01:37:13.560]  You asked me about yours.
[01:37:13.560 --> 01:37:16.560]  Okay, I misunderstood you.
[01:37:16.560 --> 01:37:19.560]  So my warrants, they were issued.
[01:37:19.560 --> 01:37:25.560]  They called it, they said failure to appear, which was actually not true.
[01:37:25.560 --> 01:37:26.560]  I did.
[01:37:26.560 --> 01:37:27.560]  Okay.
[01:37:27.560 --> 01:37:29.560]  That's falsifying a government record.
[01:37:29.560 --> 01:37:33.560]  Do you have proof that you were there?
[01:37:33.560 --> 01:37:34.560]  Yeah.
[01:37:34.560 --> 01:37:36.560]  I can come up with some.
[01:37:36.560 --> 01:37:37.560]  Yeah.
[01:37:37.560 --> 01:37:39.560]  Well, what do you mean you can come up with some?
[01:37:39.560 --> 01:37:42.560]  You've been listening to this show for how long?
[01:37:42.560 --> 01:37:48.560]  Well, I didn't have some unbiased party take pictures or something if that's what you
[01:37:48.560 --> 01:37:49.560]  aimed at.
[01:37:49.560 --> 01:37:53.560]  How are you going to take pictures after the fact?
[01:37:53.560 --> 01:37:57.560]  No, that's not what I'm saying.
[01:37:57.560 --> 01:38:03.560]  I'm saying I'll find some way to correlate something that shows that I was, that I did the appearance.
[01:38:03.560 --> 01:38:04.560]  Okay.
[01:38:04.560 --> 01:38:09.560]  When you appeared down there on the proper day, right?
[01:38:09.560 --> 01:38:12.560]  On a proper day?
[01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:15.560]  Yeah, if I remember correctly, they had a range of days.
[01:38:15.560 --> 01:38:16.560]  It wasn't.
[01:38:16.560 --> 01:38:17.560]  Yeah?
[01:38:17.560 --> 01:38:21.560]  But you were in before the due date on the citation, right?
[01:38:21.560 --> 01:38:22.560]  Yes.
[01:38:22.560 --> 01:38:28.560]  And what did you do while you were there?
[01:38:28.560 --> 01:38:30.560]  They wanted a prosecutor.
[01:38:30.560 --> 01:38:34.560]  They had a prosecutor that wanted me to do a plea.
[01:38:34.560 --> 01:38:35.560]  Okay.
[01:38:35.560 --> 01:38:39.560]  And so I said, well, how can I plea when there's not even any charges?
[01:38:39.560 --> 01:38:41.560]  You don't have a charging instrument?
[01:38:41.560 --> 01:38:44.560]  When you look at it, I want to copy it and have anything.
[01:38:44.560 --> 01:38:47.560]  So, you know, then they, I don't know.
[01:38:47.560 --> 01:38:49.560]  I don't know what they entered in on their side.
[01:38:49.560 --> 01:38:50.560]  Okay.
[01:38:50.560 --> 01:38:51.560]  But I didn't ask what they did.
[01:38:51.560 --> 01:38:54.560]  I asked what you did.
[01:38:54.560 --> 01:38:55.560]  Okay.
[01:38:55.560 --> 01:38:59.560]  So, let's see.
[01:38:59.560 --> 01:39:07.560]  I said I can't plea, I can't enter a plea when there's no charges.
[01:39:07.560 --> 01:39:11.560]  To which they replied?
[01:39:11.560 --> 01:39:13.560]  No, I wish I could remember what they said.
[01:39:13.560 --> 01:39:14.560]  It was.
[01:39:14.560 --> 01:39:15.560]  Okay.
[01:39:15.560 --> 01:39:16.560]  But my point here is this.
[01:39:16.560 --> 01:39:18.560]  You didn't file a single document.
[01:39:18.560 --> 01:39:23.560]  You didn't record a single conversation.
[01:39:23.560 --> 01:39:27.560]  You didn't, you don't have any video of you being in the courthouse with
[01:39:27.560 --> 01:39:31.560]  something in the background that shows the date and time.
[01:39:31.560 --> 01:39:32.560]  You've got none of that.
[01:39:32.560 --> 01:39:35.560]  Am I correct?
[01:39:35.560 --> 01:39:37.560]  So, I do have documents I filed.
[01:39:37.560 --> 01:39:40.560]  You have documents you filed.
[01:39:40.560 --> 01:39:45.560]  Do those documents bear a stamp from the court clerk?
[01:39:45.560 --> 01:39:49.560]  It's got a stamp, but it's not, it's from the judge.
[01:39:49.560 --> 01:39:51.560]  The judge had a stamp.
[01:39:51.560 --> 01:39:53.560]  It wasn't a file stamp.
[01:39:53.560 --> 01:39:56.560]  Does it have a date on it?
[01:39:56.560 --> 01:39:57.560]  No.
[01:39:57.560 --> 01:39:58.560]  It just says denied.
[01:39:58.560 --> 01:40:02.560]  That's all it says.
[01:40:02.560 --> 01:40:05.560]  Okay.
[01:40:05.560 --> 01:40:10.560]  When it says denied, did the judge sign an order denying whatever it was you
[01:40:10.560 --> 01:40:13.560]  tried to file?
[01:40:13.560 --> 01:40:15.560]  Well, that's a good question.
[01:40:15.560 --> 01:40:17.560]  Don't know about that.
[01:40:17.560 --> 01:40:18.560]  Okay.
[01:40:18.560 --> 01:40:24.560]  I have been through a bunch of information requests and attempts to get them to give
[01:40:24.560 --> 01:40:29.560]  me the information that's in the file, and so far they're all ignoring me,
[01:40:29.560 --> 01:40:30.560]  which is a result.
[01:40:30.560 --> 01:40:33.560]  Then file a criminal complaint with the Attorney General's office that the
[01:40:33.560 --> 01:40:37.560]  court is not providing you copies of public records.
[01:40:37.560 --> 01:40:41.560]  All court records except for the internal administrative records of the court
[01:40:41.560 --> 01:40:44.560]  function are public records.
[01:40:44.560 --> 01:40:49.560]  Everything in an adjudicatory file is public record.
[01:40:49.560 --> 01:40:52.560]  They have to give it to the public.
[01:40:52.560 --> 01:40:55.560]  There are no exceptions to that.
[01:40:55.560 --> 01:40:57.560]  I agree.
[01:40:57.560 --> 01:41:05.560]  So file a criminal complaint under 552.323 with the Attorney General's office
[01:41:05.560 --> 01:41:09.560]  against that court clerk and against that judge.
[01:41:09.560 --> 01:41:15.560]  And file a complaint of falsifying a government record to boot.
[01:41:15.560 --> 01:41:16.560]  All right.
[01:41:16.560 --> 01:41:21.560]  Well, I've done some criminal complaints, but I haven't gone to the AG about it.
[01:41:21.560 --> 01:41:26.560]  The AG is the one responsible for enforcing the Open Records Act and public
[01:41:26.560 --> 01:41:30.560]  information in general.
[01:41:30.560 --> 01:41:31.560]  All right.
[01:41:31.560 --> 01:41:34.560]  Great.
[01:41:34.560 --> 01:41:38.560]  So do you think that going to the AG about it is going to get the warrants lifted?
[01:41:38.560 --> 01:41:42.560]  You mentioned a minute ago about my motion to withdraw the warrants.
[01:41:42.560 --> 01:41:43.560]  Yeah.
[01:41:43.560 --> 01:41:45.560]  They can either withdraw or quash the warrant.
[01:41:45.560 --> 01:41:50.560]  You can file a motion with your basic legal argument about why the warrant has
[01:41:50.560 --> 01:41:55.560]  quashed or you can file a motion requesting the court withdraw it based upon
[01:41:55.560 --> 01:41:57.560]  whatever reason.
[01:41:57.560 --> 01:41:58.560]  Okay.
[01:41:58.560 --> 01:42:02.560]  What's the difference between quashing and withdrawing?
[01:42:02.560 --> 01:42:08.560]  Well, one is you citing legal facts that gives the judge no choice and the other
[01:42:08.560 --> 01:42:10.560]  is asking the judge nicely.
[01:42:10.560 --> 01:42:16.560]  Here's the reason this warrant shouldn't exist and I'm asking you to recall it.
[01:42:16.560 --> 01:42:19.560]  Okay.
[01:42:19.560 --> 01:42:21.560]  All right.
[01:42:21.560 --> 01:42:24.560]  Great.
[01:42:24.560 --> 01:42:27.560]  Okay.
[01:42:27.560 --> 01:42:28.560]  Thanks again, really.
[01:42:28.560 --> 01:42:29.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:42:29.560 --> 01:42:30.560]  Appreciate you.
[01:42:30.560 --> 01:42:32.560]  No worries.
[01:42:32.560 --> 01:42:33.560]  Well, good night.
[01:42:33.560 --> 01:42:34.560]  You too.
[01:42:34.560 --> 01:42:35.560]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:42:35.560 --> 01:42:36.560]  All right.
[01:42:36.560 --> 01:42:38.560]  Now we have Tim in Texas.
[01:42:38.560 --> 01:42:39.560]  Tim, what do you got?
[01:42:39.560 --> 01:42:41.560]  How you doing, sir?
[01:42:41.560 --> 01:42:48.560]  Well, that really depends upon how you listen to things out there.
[01:42:48.560 --> 01:42:50.560]  It sounds like you're ready to get the show over.
[01:42:50.560 --> 01:42:51.560]  No.
[01:42:51.560 --> 01:42:53.560]  I'm never really up for that.
[01:42:53.560 --> 01:42:56.560]  It's just sometimes I'm kind of going like there's a point near somewhere.
[01:42:56.560 --> 01:42:59.560]  I hope we find it soon.
[01:42:59.560 --> 01:43:02.560]  So you're like 12 steps ahead of everyone else, okay?
[01:43:02.560 --> 01:43:07.560]  I don't know about that because sometimes it's really hard trying to play catch up
[01:43:07.560 --> 01:43:09.560]  before this conversation went off the rails.
[01:43:09.560 --> 01:43:10.560]  Yeah.
[01:43:10.560 --> 01:43:14.560]  Well, I'll start with mine.
[01:43:14.560 --> 01:43:17.560]  You know, I think you remember me, don't you?
[01:43:17.560 --> 01:43:21.560]  Well, there's a lot of Tim's in Texas and I know quite a few of them.
[01:43:21.560 --> 01:43:27.560]  Yeah, I'm the one that had code violations here with my shop.
[01:43:27.560 --> 01:43:28.560]  Okay.
[01:43:28.560 --> 01:43:29.560]  The cars?
[01:43:29.560 --> 01:43:30.560]  Yeah, cars.
[01:43:30.560 --> 01:43:31.560]  Okay.
[01:43:31.560 --> 01:43:33.560]  Sorry, it's not vehicles, yeah.
[01:43:33.560 --> 01:43:34.560]  All right.
[01:43:34.560 --> 01:43:35.560]  Well, hang on just a second.
[01:43:35.560 --> 01:43:38.560]  Let me get this break and then we'll pick it up on the other side, okay?
[01:43:38.560 --> 01:43:39.560]  Okay.
[01:43:39.560 --> 01:43:40.560]  All right, folks, y'all hang on.
[01:43:40.560 --> 01:43:42.560]  We are going into the last segment after this break.
[01:43:42.560 --> 01:43:45.560]  I will try to get through the rest of the color board if I have the time.
[01:43:45.560 --> 01:43:48.560]  So, y'all hang on, give me a chance.
[01:43:48.560 --> 01:43:50.560]  I can't promise, but I'll do my best.
[01:43:50.560 --> 01:44:19.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break.
[01:44:20.560 --> 01:44:46.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:44:46.560 --> 01:45:15.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:45:15.560 --> 01:45:43.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:45:43.560 --> 01:46:09.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:46:09.560 --> 01:46:27.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:27.560 --> 01:46:29.560]  We are now in the last segment of the show.
[01:46:29.560 --> 01:46:34.560]  We are talking to Tim in Texas about his shop and car issue.
[01:46:34.560 --> 01:46:36.560]  All right, let's continue on.
[01:46:36.560 --> 01:46:44.560]  Well, they're basically trying to sue me for administrative fees and everything, upwards of $80,000.
[01:46:44.560 --> 01:46:51.560]  And some friends of mine in the city that know me, they're actually customers of mine, ran for counsel.
[01:46:51.560 --> 01:46:52.560]  Yeah, I remember that.
[01:46:52.560 --> 01:47:00.560]  And one of them was in violation of the same stuff for a while.
[01:47:00.560 --> 01:47:04.560]  One was in violation of the same type of stuff for a while, right?
[01:47:04.560 --> 01:47:05.560]  No.
[01:47:05.560 --> 01:47:07.560]  No, none of them were in violation.
[01:47:07.560 --> 01:47:08.560]  Oh, okay.
[01:47:08.560 --> 01:47:10.560]  Well, I'm sorry that I'm missing the other point here.
[01:47:10.560 --> 01:47:17.560]  Okay, well, the other one that ran was a Canadian and he wasn't eligible.
[01:47:17.560 --> 01:47:21.560]  But he went ahead and signed up and swore the oath and everything.
[01:47:21.560 --> 01:47:23.560]  We didn't know.
[01:47:23.560 --> 01:47:27.560]  And so they found out the first day of early voting and called him.
[01:47:27.560 --> 01:47:29.560]  I guess they threatened him.
[01:47:29.560 --> 01:47:36.560]  In fact, they had a meeting and he's come out and made a public statement saying that me and mentioning our names,
[01:47:36.560 --> 01:47:46.560]  me and the other guy, misled him and coerced him into running and that he apologized and wanted everybody to quit the phone.
[01:47:46.560 --> 01:47:51.560]  Oh, well, there's a slander and libel suit right there.
[01:47:51.560 --> 01:47:56.560]  Yeah, I know it, but I don't know that's what the guy needs.
[01:47:56.560 --> 01:47:58.560]  Well, but here's the thing.
[01:47:58.560 --> 01:48:07.560]  If he made that announcement, then that's exactly what he needs because what he's done now is put you in the line of sight for criminal charges
[01:48:07.560 --> 01:48:16.560]  by making that statement because it's illegal to coerce a political candidate of any kind for any reason.
[01:48:16.560 --> 01:48:19.560]  Well, look at the word coerced.
[01:48:19.560 --> 01:48:21.560]  I couldn't have coerced him.
[01:48:21.560 --> 01:48:23.560]  Well, you're missing the whole point here.
[01:48:23.560 --> 01:48:24.560]  Okay.
[01:48:24.560 --> 01:48:33.560]  He's made the allegation that's enough for somebody to pick up that ball and say, let's see if we can go after these guys for this.
[01:48:33.560 --> 01:48:35.560]  Oh, okay.
[01:48:35.560 --> 01:48:39.560]  Well, hmm, okay.
[01:48:39.560 --> 01:48:42.560]  Well, God, this is crazy.
[01:48:42.560 --> 01:48:50.560]  I have a, you know, I talked to Randy today and he said, he said the county DA would basically take the case.
[01:48:50.560 --> 01:48:54.560]  It would be out of their hands if the city wanted to press this thing.
[01:48:54.560 --> 01:48:55.560]  Okay.
[01:48:55.560 --> 01:48:57.560]  Obviously, he's not eligible.
[01:48:57.560 --> 01:48:59.560]  He can't withdraw from the race.
[01:48:59.560 --> 01:49:00.560]  Okay.
[01:49:00.560 --> 01:49:05.560]  The election committee already told him that, but he cannot hold the office.
[01:49:05.560 --> 01:49:06.560]  Well, wait a minute.
[01:49:06.560 --> 01:49:13.560]  How can someone ineligible not withdraw?
[01:49:13.560 --> 01:49:15.560]  That makes absolutely no sense.
[01:49:15.560 --> 01:49:16.560]  I'm sorry.
[01:49:16.560 --> 01:49:19.560]  His name not be taken off the ballot is what it is.
[01:49:19.560 --> 01:49:22.560]  So you can still vote for him if you go into vote.
[01:49:22.560 --> 01:49:25.560]  That way the other guy loses.
[01:49:25.560 --> 01:49:30.560]  And so they had a meeting tonight with four councilmen.
[01:49:30.560 --> 01:49:32.560]  They won two, three.
[01:49:32.560 --> 01:49:41.560]  Yeah, but that gives y'all the opportunity to declare the ballot invalid because it contains an ineligible candidate.
[01:49:41.560 --> 01:49:44.560]  Okay.
[01:49:44.560 --> 01:49:46.560]  Okay.
[01:49:46.560 --> 01:49:49.560]  All right, I didn't think about that.
[01:49:49.560 --> 01:49:52.560]  This is all new to me, you know, details of the law.
[01:49:52.560 --> 01:49:55.560]  So I just thought, um...
[01:49:55.560 --> 01:50:05.560]  Yeah, the election committee can't sit there and knowingly run a ballot through that they know contains an unqualified candidate.
[01:50:05.560 --> 01:50:15.560]  Well, I'm saying that they didn't know, but it's funny that the first day of early voting at nine that morning, the other councilman who's a friend of mine got a phone call.
[01:50:15.560 --> 01:50:20.560]  Stating that from the city administrator.
[01:50:20.560 --> 01:50:21.560]  Okay.
[01:50:21.560 --> 01:50:25.560]  Well, that sounds like a public information request in an Open Meetings Act.
[01:50:25.560 --> 01:50:30.560]  Open Meetings Act material on when they found this out, how long they knew.
[01:50:30.560 --> 01:50:31.560]  Yeah.
[01:50:31.560 --> 01:50:33.560]  And so on and so forth.
[01:50:33.560 --> 01:50:37.560]  I guarantee you somebody's going to get buried if you find the right information.
[01:50:37.560 --> 01:50:38.560]  Yeah.
[01:50:38.560 --> 01:50:42.560]  I just don't know how that we would find any information if it was all done over telephone.
[01:50:42.560 --> 01:50:45.560]  I just told you they're not allowed.
[01:50:45.560 --> 01:50:51.560]  Everything they do when they communicate with each other has to be recorded under the Open Meetings Act.
[01:50:51.560 --> 01:50:54.560]  Talk about the meeting.
[01:50:54.560 --> 01:50:56.560]  You're not listening to me.
[01:50:56.560 --> 01:51:11.560]  Everything they do when two or more city councilmen or commissioners in a commissioner's court, two or more are communicating about any business relating to those offices.
[01:51:11.560 --> 01:51:18.560]  It has to be on record, whether it be email, telephone, any of it.
[01:51:18.560 --> 01:51:20.560]  That includes election.
[01:51:20.560 --> 01:51:21.560]  Correct.
[01:51:21.560 --> 01:51:22.560]  Okay.
[01:51:22.560 --> 01:51:23.560]  All right.
[01:51:23.560 --> 01:51:24.560]  I didn't know that.
[01:51:24.560 --> 01:51:26.560]  I thought it was just city business.
[01:51:26.560 --> 01:51:29.560]  When is an election for council not city business?
[01:51:29.560 --> 01:51:30.560]  Okay.
[01:51:30.560 --> 01:51:31.560]  All right.
[01:51:31.560 --> 01:51:33.560]  I understand.
[01:51:33.560 --> 01:51:34.560]  Okay.
[01:51:34.560 --> 01:51:36.560]  Well, that just clarifies for it.
[01:51:36.560 --> 01:51:46.560]  You know, like Dave Champion says, unless the word, you know, when they say a term, you know, anyway, this is frustrating.
[01:51:46.560 --> 01:51:58.560]  I agree, and I can't argue that it's not, but you also have a constitutional claim here of excessive fines, which they're not allowed to do.
[01:51:58.560 --> 01:52:00.560]  Right.
[01:52:00.560 --> 01:52:10.560]  Well, I think what we're doing right now is we're preparing a mandamus and also we're going to try to do a change of venue with the court because we have criminal charges against the district court.
[01:52:10.560 --> 01:52:16.560]  And so, and a couple of other things.
[01:52:16.560 --> 01:52:17.560]  Okay.
[01:52:17.560 --> 01:52:36.560]  But I thought you would find that interesting that you put pressure on a person. I mean, it was just stupid for him to do that. If anybody had known that he was a Canadian citizen and it affected his, you know, his voter rights or not being able to vote, they would have said, hey, you can't do that.
[01:52:36.560 --> 01:52:38.560]  Well, he should have known.
[01:52:38.560 --> 01:52:39.560]  I know it.
[01:52:39.560 --> 01:52:44.560]  But in the thing, it asks, are you a United States citizen?
[01:52:44.560 --> 01:52:45.560]  Right.
[01:52:45.560 --> 01:52:49.560]  And he should have known he was lying when he filled out the application to run.
[01:52:49.560 --> 01:52:50.560]  Exactly.
[01:52:50.560 --> 01:52:52.560]  It says, are you a registered voter?
[01:52:52.560 --> 01:52:53.560]  Yeah.
[01:52:53.560 --> 01:52:56.560]  See, the thing is what he did was commit a felony.
[01:52:56.560 --> 01:52:59.560]  He falsified a government document.
[01:52:59.560 --> 01:53:00.560]  Right.
[01:53:00.560 --> 01:53:05.560]  And he did so with the intent to receive a benefit by that falsification.
[01:53:05.560 --> 01:53:07.560]  That's a felony.
[01:53:07.560 --> 01:53:08.560]  Yeah.
[01:53:08.560 --> 01:53:09.560]  Okay.
[01:53:09.560 --> 01:53:11.560]  That's not just a class A, huh?
[01:53:11.560 --> 01:53:13.560]  No.
[01:53:13.560 --> 01:53:15.560]  Okay.
[01:53:15.560 --> 01:53:16.560]  Okay.
[01:53:16.560 --> 01:53:17.560]  Okay.
[01:53:17.560 --> 01:53:18.560]  Okay.
[01:53:18.560 --> 01:53:19.560]  Okay.
[01:53:19.560 --> 01:53:21.560]  I don't want you getting too fired up for bedtime.
[01:53:21.560 --> 01:53:22.560]  Okay.
[01:53:22.560 --> 01:53:25.560]  I've got hours to go before bedtime looms up for me.
[01:53:25.560 --> 01:53:26.560]  I know it.
[01:53:26.560 --> 01:53:27.560]  This loss.
[01:53:27.560 --> 01:53:31.560]  What do you think gets me through the night on Mondays if it didn't need conversations?
[01:53:31.560 --> 01:53:32.560]  You know?
[01:53:32.560 --> 01:53:38.560]  I spent, I spent my time and every half an hour, I'll sit back, shake my head and go,
[01:53:38.560 --> 01:53:40.560]  what in the hell?
[01:53:40.560 --> 01:53:44.560]  Well, it's because of the legal system, correct?
[01:53:44.560 --> 01:53:45.560]  Yeah.
[01:53:45.560 --> 01:53:48.560]  That's all it is, the legal system.
[01:53:48.560 --> 01:53:50.560]  It's not anybody in it.
[01:53:50.560 --> 01:53:52.560]  It's not anybody trying to stay out of it.
[01:53:52.560 --> 01:53:54.560]  It's just the system.
[01:53:54.560 --> 01:53:58.560]  Listen, it wouldn't be no legal system without the humans involved.
[01:53:58.560 --> 01:54:02.560]  Granted.
[01:54:02.560 --> 01:54:04.560]  Well, okay.
[01:54:04.560 --> 01:54:07.560]  Well, now we have another thing to look at.
[01:54:07.560 --> 01:54:09.560]  You know, that's, I think that's where the attorneys get you.
[01:54:09.560 --> 01:54:16.560]  They just crowd you with so much stinking paperwork that you suffocate and fear doubt.
[01:54:16.560 --> 01:54:18.560]  That's what it's always about.
[01:54:18.560 --> 01:54:20.560]  That is what it's always about.
[01:54:20.560 --> 01:54:21.560]  Yeah.
[01:54:21.560 --> 01:54:22.560]  Okay.
[01:54:22.560 --> 01:54:24.560]  I read something in Rule 13.
[01:54:24.560 --> 01:54:32.560]  I think of the government code and it said that if attorneys submit any motions or anything
[01:54:32.560 --> 01:54:38.560]  knowing that they have no merit, then that is a, I think, a felony.
[01:54:38.560 --> 01:54:40.560]  Well, you would think.
[01:54:40.560 --> 01:54:44.560]  Have you ever seen the Gene Hackman movie, Class Action?
[01:54:44.560 --> 01:54:46.560]  I don't know if I have.
[01:54:46.560 --> 01:54:48.560]  I've seen so many of his movies over the years.
[01:54:48.560 --> 01:54:56.560]  Well, it's the one where the, one of the female attorneys he's up against in this case is actually his daughter.
[01:54:56.560 --> 01:54:57.560]  Oh, okay.
[01:54:57.560 --> 01:55:08.560]  Mary Monster Antonio plays his daughter in this and he's, he's well known for all of these civil lawsuits.
[01:55:08.560 --> 01:55:15.560]  He's one for consumers against defective products and companies and she happens to be working for a big law firm defending this great big huge car company.
[01:55:15.560 --> 01:55:16.560]  Okay.
[01:55:16.560 --> 01:55:17.560]  Okay.
[01:55:17.560 --> 01:55:29.560]  So this car company had a defective car that the wiring on it was arranged in such a way that if the car got rear ended while the, the turn signal, one of the left to right turn signal was activated.
[01:55:29.560 --> 01:55:35.560]  It would puncture the fuel tank and cause the car to explode and burn anybody inside of it.
[01:55:35.560 --> 01:55:40.560]  And there was a husband who was suing because of that.
[01:55:40.560 --> 01:55:58.560]  One of the scenes in here is when they find out that these, this car company has certain records, especially one particular record, which is the report of the then chief engineer for the car company who had told them that this problem existed and had swept it under the rug.
[01:55:58.560 --> 01:56:06.560]  Because the guy that's now running the company knew about it, but didn't want to do the recall because of the millions of dollars involved.
[01:56:06.560 --> 01:56:07.560]  Okay.
[01:56:07.560 --> 01:56:12.560]  And this report was going to be key to Hackman's defense.
[01:56:12.560 --> 01:56:21.560]  Well, what the other side did was they buried him in boxes upon boxes upon boxes of paper.
[01:56:21.560 --> 01:56:32.560]  And then they intentionally misnumbered the listing that they're supposed to provide that tells you what each of these boxes contains as far as specific information.
[01:56:32.560 --> 01:56:33.560]  Yeah.
[01:56:33.560 --> 01:56:39.560]  And it turns out that they actually did not give them this report in the first place, blah, blah, blah.
[01:56:39.560 --> 01:56:49.560]  But the thing is it goes a long way to show you exactly the kind of crap that they will pull to keep certain information out of people's hands or to keep it buried so far out of sight.
[01:56:49.560 --> 01:56:53.560]  They hope they never find it in order to be able to use it.
[01:56:53.560 --> 01:56:54.560]  Right.
[01:56:54.560 --> 01:56:55.560]  So you're right.
[01:56:55.560 --> 01:57:04.560]  They will snowstorm you, they will blizzard you into submission with paperwork on discovery if they think it's what will help them win.
[01:57:04.560 --> 01:57:10.560]  So how would you word this public information's request at City Hall?
[01:57:10.560 --> 01:57:13.560]  Because what am I asking for?
[01:57:13.560 --> 01:57:15.560]  What am I asking for?
[01:57:15.560 --> 01:57:22.560]  Any conversation, telephone conversations, anything else that goes along with that between any...
[01:57:22.560 --> 01:57:44.560]  Can narrow it down any communications, whether verbal electronic written or stored or retrieved or read by any other means, relating specifically to knowledge of such and such persons, inability to run and hold a public office due to not being a U.S.
[01:57:44.560 --> 01:57:45.560]  national or a U.S. citizen.
[01:57:45.560 --> 01:57:46.560]  Okay.
[01:57:46.560 --> 01:57:47.560]  Okay.
[01:57:47.560 --> 01:57:48.560]  Something to that effect.
[01:57:48.560 --> 01:57:53.560]  I don't really want to go after this guy because he was a friend of mine, but I think they've got him scared.
[01:57:53.560 --> 01:58:04.560]  Well, when he threw you under the bus by citing you as someone that coerced him, that's not a friend because there's a very good chance he could have just now gotten you investigated and charged with a felony.
[01:58:04.560 --> 01:58:06.560]  Oh, boy.
[01:58:06.560 --> 01:58:08.560]  I don't know how I could have cursed him.
[01:58:08.560 --> 01:58:10.560]  I'm just a citizen.
[01:58:10.560 --> 01:58:12.560]  Yeah, well, you never know.
[01:58:12.560 --> 01:58:16.560]  People have a strange way of looking at what coercion is to them these days.
[01:58:16.560 --> 01:58:21.560]  However, all you got to do is say something they don't like and they're being coerced and having to listen.
[01:58:21.560 --> 01:58:22.560]  Right.
[01:58:22.560 --> 01:58:23.560]  Okay.
[01:58:23.560 --> 01:58:25.560]  But again, thanks for calling in, Tim.
[01:58:25.560 --> 01:58:26.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:26.560 --> 01:58:27.560]  All right, folks.
[01:58:27.560 --> 01:58:28.560]  I am sorry.
[01:58:28.560 --> 01:58:29.560]  I am out of time.
[01:58:29.560 --> 01:58:33.560]  All the other callers up on the board, I apologize for not getting to you.
[01:58:33.560 --> 01:58:35.560]  Folks, y'all have a great week.
[01:58:35.560 --> 01:58:37.560]  I want to say thank you for listening.
[01:58:37.560 --> 01:58:41.560]  Please continue to support the network with your finances whenever and however you can.
[01:58:41.560 --> 01:58:43.560]  We really, really need it.
[01:58:43.560 --> 01:58:47.560]  Please keep us in your prayers and in your funding whenever possible.
[01:58:47.560 --> 01:58:48.560]  Y'all have a great week.
[01:58:48.560 --> 01:58:49.560]  Good night.
[01:58:49.560 --> 01:59:18.560]  Thank you.
[01:59:19.560 --> 01:59:48.560]  Thank you.
[01:59:50.560 --> 01:59:52.560]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.560 --> 01:59:54.560]  You found it.
[01:59:54.560 --> 02:00:20.560]  Thank you.