[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The fall in these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:08.000 --> 00:15.000]  bulletins for the Commodities Market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[00:15.560 --> 00:18.560]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:18.560 --> 00:34.560]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22, silver $16.68, Texas Crude $65.51,
[00:34.560 --> 00:45.040]  bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum $420.80, bitcoin cash is at $652.90 and finally lite coins
[00:45.040 --> 00:50.040]  at $114.34, a crypto coin.
[00:50.040 --> 01:04.040]  Today in history, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, which
[01:04.040 --> 01:07.560]  prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex or national
[01:07.560 --> 01:12.680]  origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial
[01:12.680 --> 01:17.680]  segregation in public schools, in employment and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:17.680 --> 01:22.680]  Today in history.
[01:22.680 --> 01:28.120]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.120 --> 01:32.400]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:32.400 --> 01:36.840]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:36.840 --> 01:42.040]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence
[01:42.040 --> 01:46.520]  as of yet. President Trump tweeted today, Wednesday, that if, quote, Russia vows to
[01:46.520 --> 01:50.880]  shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will be coming
[01:50.880 --> 01:55.240]  in nice and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with
[01:55.240 --> 01:59.560]  a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:59.560 --> 02:04.640]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[02:04.640 --> 02:09.720]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[02:09.720 --> 02:14.040]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side
[02:14.040 --> 02:18.920]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[02:18.920 --> 02:22.900]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and
[02:22.900 --> 02:27.800]  anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with
[02:27.800 --> 02:32.600]  ISIS being one of the more notorious swimmer groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.600 --> 02:37.960]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted on Facebook
[02:37.960 --> 02:42.320]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.320 --> 02:47.240]  has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[02:47.240 --> 02:51.080]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[02:51.080 --> 03:21.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, we love our radio, and on this, the
[03:21.040 --> 03:34.040]  Friday the 13th, April 2018, and we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. Okay, go ahead, Mark.
[03:34.040 --> 03:40.320]  All right. The high points here taken from briefs of the briefwriter, No Windowheel,
[03:40.320 --> 03:45.720]  the supervisory writ from Wisconsin Law Journal. A supervisory writ is a way to obtain jurisdiction
[03:45.720 --> 03:51.320]  of court of appeals or Supreme Court through other than normal appeal petition procedures.
[03:51.320 --> 03:58.960]  So if this type of case where the corporation has the opportunity to just drop the case,
[03:58.960 --> 04:06.720]  they're never going to get there. Okay, now, this is an extraordinary or drastic remedy
[04:06.720 --> 04:13.080]  to only be issued upon a previous exceediency. You must be able to show an appeal as an inadequate
[04:13.080 --> 04:19.800]  remedy. Well, if it was going to get tossed, it would, you know, inadequate. Grave hardship
[04:19.800 --> 04:26.720]  or irreparable harm would occur. Yeah. Like, like you'd be forced to adjudicate
[04:26.720 --> 04:36.200]  a case that the writ would, that the, the issue would be dispositive of, like this
[04:36.200 --> 04:40.640]  guy can't invoke subject matter jurisdiction of the court, it would dispose of the case.
[04:40.640 --> 04:47.400]  You wouldn't be subject to the harm of having to adjudicate this entire case.
[04:47.400 --> 04:53.600]  The duty sought to be enforced as plain and the trial court has or intends to violate
[04:53.600 --> 04:59.480]  that duty. No adequate law, remedy and law exist. And the request is they made promptly
[04:59.480 --> 05:07.720]  and speedily. Okay. Then it goes into they, they, the petition must contain statements
[05:07.720 --> 05:14.280]  of issue, blah, blah, blah. No, it's further here. Oh, the appellate court may consider
[05:14.280 --> 05:18.760]  the rights of the public and third parties in addition to those expressly named in the
[05:18.760 --> 05:25.160]  petition. And how I'm going to hang a frame around that is this moves the jurisprudence
[05:25.160 --> 05:33.800]  of the state forward. But also that seems to point at a private
[05:33.800 --> 05:40.280]  attorney general claim. You are not the only one harmed by this issue.
[05:40.280 --> 05:47.480]  Correct. But again, we're not going to, we're going to use their words, uh, rate of supervision
[05:47.480 --> 05:57.200]  or, you know, supervisory writ. And it's since the small claims are covered, uh, all procedures
[05:57.200 --> 06:04.440]  otherwise are covering in small claims, I can pull this. So it's just a difference in
[06:04.440 --> 06:10.920]  how law is. Yeah, this, this sounds very much like an
[06:10.920 --> 06:19.520]  interlocutory appeal. A limited appeal, appeal on an issue that would act as a dispositive
[06:19.520 --> 06:29.320]  issue. Okay. And let me explain for those that didn't get that dispositive issue. You
[06:29.320 --> 06:33.520]  bring something before the court and the court denies it. Now you're subject to adjudicating
[06:33.520 --> 06:40.480]  the entire case. If this ruling were ruled properly, it would dispose of the case. That
[06:40.480 --> 06:45.320]  makes it dispositive. And if it's dispositive, then it's subject to interlocutory appeal.
[06:45.320 --> 06:55.160]  You can appeal that focused issue as a ruling in your favor would be adjudicatively efficient
[06:55.160 --> 07:00.920]  as it would save both parties all the time and trouble it took to adjudicate these issues
[07:00.920 --> 07:08.400]  in the court. That sounds like what, uh, supervisory writ goes to, goes pretty close to.
[07:08.400 --> 07:14.400]  Mm-hmm. And it explicitly says here, supervisory writ is not available for discretionary term
[07:14.400 --> 07:20.280]  donations, less appeal would be inadequate. Then it gives the site some case law. In other
[07:20.280 --> 07:25.600]  words, if you've missed the deadline for you either or your interlocutory appeal petition
[07:25.600 --> 07:33.560]  has been denied, a writ won't automatically give you a redo. So there's the mess.
[07:33.560 --> 07:36.160]  Holy, did you say a writ? Interlocutory.
[07:36.160 --> 07:42.880]  Will or will not give you an automatic redo. In other words, comma, if you've missed the
[07:42.880 --> 07:51.560]  deadline for either or your interlocutory appeal petition has been denied, comma, a writ won't
[07:51.560 --> 07:58.600]  automatically give you a redo. Oh, so it will give you a redo. Wonderful.
[07:58.600 --> 08:09.440]  It certainly can give you a redo. Yes. Um, otherwise, I took your, um, ball of spoilage
[08:09.440 --> 08:18.880]  and have run with that. And that's been fun. Um, I guess I'll, we'll see how far they
[08:18.880 --> 08:25.320]  get on, once I file this writ, we'll see how far they get on that and a few other things.
[08:25.320 --> 08:32.120]  The attorney has also accused me of doing things to delay the, um, the one conclusion
[08:32.120 --> 08:36.440]  that can be drawn is that the amended answer would serve to delay a conclusion of this
[08:36.440 --> 08:43.080]  matter or in this matter. So here I'm being accused of just, uh, delaying things.
[08:43.080 --> 08:49.120]  So any opposition to any issue that the lawyer has made would have the effect of delaying
[08:49.120 --> 08:53.400]  the matter. Okay. Your point is,
[08:53.400 --> 09:01.200]  Mm hmm. Yeah. Yeah. I'm not, you know, here's a guy who didn't do this, didn't do this,
[09:01.200 --> 09:06.800]  didn't do this, didn't answer this, didn't do this, didn't do this. Yeah. Mm hmm.
[09:06.800 --> 09:15.040]  And like I say, I, I appreciate your, your help and, um, clarification on these things.
[09:15.040 --> 09:21.120]  Um, it's too bad there wasn't a real good way to kick them in the teeth with bankruptcy
[09:21.120 --> 09:29.800]  for ha ha's for people, but, uh, definitely they need, people need to be aware that if
[09:29.800 --> 09:34.120]  they are, when they're going to look at signing a credit card and if they've declared bankruptcy
[09:34.120 --> 09:39.400]  or any of these other things, uh, apparently they're willing to try a clawback at least
[09:39.400 --> 09:48.400]  as demonstrated in Louisiana court. Yeah. So if you get a petition or a promotion from
[09:48.400 --> 09:55.360]  a company that you've had a credit card with before and have defaulted or, or bankrupted
[09:55.360 --> 10:04.800]  on, be careful. Yeah. Well, anything is this cap one's been sending me offers, uh, continuously
[10:04.800 --> 10:12.520]  since this case has happened and they've stepped it up in, in, in the last two months, about
[10:12.520 --> 10:18.520]  every three weeks I get something from them. And up until I found that Louisiana, uh, reference,
[10:18.520 --> 10:23.280]  I thought they were just chumps and I was laughing. After that it was like, nah, they're
[10:23.280 --> 10:31.280]  sneaky. They're tricky offices. Try to trick out them. Okay. Anything else for us, Mark?
[10:31.280 --> 10:36.600]  Let's go to the next caller. Nope. That's it. Thank you very much for your time again,
[10:36.600 --> 10:47.960]  Mr. Kelton. Thank you, Mark. Okay. Now we're going to Tim in Texas. Hello, Tim. Hello.
[10:47.960 --> 10:55.560]  What do you have for us today? Oh, I don't know. Um, I'm almost fell asleep listening
[10:55.560 --> 11:06.640]  to you guys. I have that effect on people. Um, well, really just kind of set around and
[11:06.640 --> 11:14.320]  tried to figure out a plan of attack with this city council. Not sure the attorney doesn't
[11:14.320 --> 11:19.680]  think to want to be responding to anything that we have requested because she says she
[11:19.680 --> 11:28.840]  doesn't have to. Okay. We, uh, I helped him put together. He sent me a, his wife did. He
[11:28.840 --> 11:36.080]  didn't do squat. Uh, his wife sent me a bar grievous against the lawyer, a bar grievous
[11:36.080 --> 11:41.240]  against the judge, a judicial, judicial conduct complaint against the judge. Tico's complaint
[11:41.240 --> 11:50.120]  against one of the bailiffs. And that was my favorite. Bailiff is in the building and
[11:50.120 --> 11:58.680]  he's prominently displaying a deadly weapon. And because Tim is actively adjudicating his
[11:58.680 --> 12:06.360]  case and the prosecuting attorney is getting annoyed. And just for reference, I listened
[12:06.360 --> 12:15.240]  to the recording of the hearing and you know, Tim comes on and he talks about these issues
[12:15.240 --> 12:27.840]  and he, he tends to sound uncomfortable and he tends to demonstrate a lack of confidence.
[12:27.840 --> 12:40.000]  You should hear him on this tape. He drove them crazy. Nothing, nothing they did had
[12:40.000 --> 12:48.720]  an effect. Everything bounced right off. He was cool and collected and sent the prosecutor
[12:48.720 --> 12:53.800]  into overdrive and got her to do all kinds of ignorant stuff. Then now we get to hammer
[12:53.800 --> 13:04.360]  her for. I am reluctant to, uh, compliment Phillip, Tim, because I don't want to get
[13:04.360 --> 13:12.080]  into big head. Yeah, but in spite of the fact that, you know, I've been where Tim is except
[13:12.080 --> 13:21.280]  mine was a year in jail and I understand how overwhelming this can be. And to listen to
[13:21.280 --> 13:30.120]  him on that tape, nothing they did affected his tone of voice or his posture or his presentation.
[13:30.120 --> 13:36.880]  He just kept going. They had a bailiff come up behind him and stand behind his wife and
[13:36.880 --> 13:44.360]  glared out at him. So what does Tim do? He stands up and asks him for his name and his
[13:44.360 --> 13:56.320]  badge number. That was wonderful. So everybody else is trying to do their little song and
[13:56.320 --> 14:01.560]  dance. What they do is they get you in court and they want to intimidate you, frustrate
[14:01.560 --> 14:09.520]  you, and get you to act out. And Tim came in at one level, stayed at that level the
[14:09.520 --> 14:16.960]  whole time. They could not manipulate him. Perfect. The other thing was that when my
[14:16.960 --> 14:25.200]  wife was sitting on the front row, the judge recognized me from the year before and, uh,
[14:25.200 --> 14:29.920]  had known that we had filed charges against his cohort, which is the other judge there.
[14:29.920 --> 14:37.240]  It's a young lady. He's an older guy and, uh, he asked her out loud where we could,
[14:37.240 --> 14:44.600]  my wife and I can hear him. How's your court case going? Oh, they dismissed it. She says,
[14:44.600 --> 14:48.880]  me and my wife just look at one another go. Do they think that we don't hear them? No,
[14:48.880 --> 14:55.160]  they know we hear them. And he just kind of smirked a little bit. Oh, I see. You know,
[14:55.160 --> 14:59.560]  like they work together. They actually, I think share a building together. They work
[14:59.560 --> 15:06.480]  together during the daytime and then they do this in the evenings. It's a small municipality.
[15:06.480 --> 15:12.600]  So, uh, you know, that's just, that was not called for, but, you know, start. We filed
[15:12.600 --> 15:19.160]  it. So Tim filed a due to his conduct complaint against him and a bar grievance. Yeah. They
[15:19.160 --> 15:26.320]  had a bar grievance against the prosecutor. She kept her face down. She was just responding
[15:26.320 --> 15:34.560]  to his question. She did not look at us in the eye or anything. She's a wise girl. Yep.
[15:34.560 --> 15:41.680]  So now that, uh, you know, the first time she was pretty arrogant, this time she sounded
[15:41.680 --> 15:50.560]  a little on the edge of hysterical, angry, frustrated. Things are not going the way I
[15:50.560 --> 15:51.560]  want them to.
[15:51.560 --> 15:59.440]  That's the prosecutor. Yeah, I was talking about the other judge. The other judge kept
[15:59.440 --> 16:04.200]  her face down, not looking me in the eye and everything when she answered the other judge
[16:04.200 --> 16:05.840]  about the court case.
[16:05.840 --> 16:12.400]  Yeah, it's probably because she knew that was really a bad idea. Yeah. Yeah. She wasn't
[16:12.400 --> 16:15.680]  about to look at us and go, I'm not opening this up again.
[16:15.680 --> 16:24.240]  Exactly. Yeah. So this is good. This is good. I think Tim, you're beginning to realize we're
[16:24.240 --> 16:30.560]  making headway and, you know, at the end of the day, the court, the case will be adjudicated
[16:30.560 --> 16:36.800]  in the court of appeals, not in the trial court. Right. So now Tim has one, has two
[16:36.800 --> 16:43.480]  criminals. Well, one criminal charges so far against the judge for not responding to finding
[16:43.480 --> 16:49.680]  defect and conclusions at all. Really pedantic, really detailed. I love those kinds of complaints.
[16:49.680 --> 16:54.280]  Hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side. Randy Kelton, we'll have our radio. We'll
[16:54.280 --> 17:01.280]  be right back.
[17:01.280 --> 17:05.840]  Dang, cookies. Cookies? Me love cookies. Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers. No, these are yucky
[17:05.840 --> 17:11.320]  cookies. Cookies? Yucky? No, no bad cookies. You can't even eat these cookies. These are
[17:11.320 --> 17:17.280]  cyber cookies. No cookies? No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. Me
[17:17.280 --> 17:24.240]  have apples. Really? Oh, that's an actual apple. Hmm, yummy apple. I'm going to say
[17:24.240 --> 17:30.680]  throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll
[17:30.680 --> 17:37.600]  down to cookies and clear them. Bye bye, yucky cookies. Now I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com
[17:37.600 --> 17:42.200]  and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link, and I
[17:42.200 --> 17:48.400]  can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookie. No cookies? For
[17:48.400 --> 17:53.640]  me? Consider it an early Christmas present. And every time I order on Amazon, I go through
[17:53.640 --> 17:58.560]  this link and I give a little present to this radio network too. See you for cookies. See
[17:58.560 --> 18:04.080]  you for collection fights. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters,
[18:04.080 --> 18:09.560]  or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael
[18:09.560 --> 18:15.040]  Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[18:15.040 --> 18:19.840]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:19.840 --> 18:24.960]  rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.960 --> 18:29.440]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[18:29.440 --> 18:34.480]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael
[18:34.480 --> 18:39.960]  Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation
[18:39.960 --> 18:45.000]  is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleablogradio.com and click
[18:45.000 --> 18:52.080]  on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleablogradio.com
[18:52.080 --> 18:59.880]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[18:59.880 --> 19:28.880]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:28.880 --> 19:35.880]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rue's Law Radio. And we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[19:35.880 --> 19:44.600]  And they're coming to Tim. Yes, sir. Now we're at the point where we, they have, the judge
[19:44.600 --> 19:54.200]  has denied everything in your, in the civil case from your side. The, Tim went to court
[19:54.200 --> 20:04.160]  on some junk vehicle allegations. He has an unrepairable establishment in Newark. His
[20:04.160 --> 20:09.440]  wife was on the city council with the city manager, didn't vote for the city managers,
[20:09.440 --> 20:15.440]  raised. You got off the city council. They started a campaign, the city manager engineered
[20:15.440 --> 20:26.320]  campaign after them. The court, the prosecutor manipulated an administrative hearing that
[20:26.320 --> 20:31.480]  was improper. There was a challenge, subject matter jurisdiction before the court that
[20:31.480 --> 20:40.160]  the court refused to put on for hearing. The prosecution failed to oppose the subject matter
[20:40.160 --> 20:49.920]  jurisdiction. Complaining, pleading. We filed for a summary judgment. The court refused
[20:49.920 --> 20:54.600]  to put the summary judgment on for hearing and then just declared that the administrative
[20:54.600 --> 21:01.760]  ruling was final and sued in the district court to collect on a judgment that was not
[21:01.760 --> 21:07.120]  final. The trial court judge in the district court looked at all this and did not care
[21:07.120 --> 21:16.360]  what the law said. Ruled against Tim on everything. So now we're at the point of moving to the
[21:16.360 --> 21:20.680]  court of appeals, but in the process, when the court ruled against the first issue, we
[21:20.680 --> 21:26.880]  asked for finding defect and conclusions at law. The judge was required to produce that
[21:26.880 --> 21:35.960]  within 20 days. He did not. If under rule 297, if the judge fails to produce the findings
[21:35.960 --> 21:43.600]  effect and conclusions at law within 20 days, then you have to file a notice of late findings
[21:43.600 --> 21:50.560]  and it has another 10 more days. But what we maintained was that after the first 20
[21:50.560 --> 21:57.200]  days, the court, the statute says the judge shall produce findings effect and conclusions
[21:57.200 --> 22:06.480]  at law. He didn't say may, might, or can if he wants to. So he failed to perform a duty
[22:06.480 --> 22:13.120]  he is required to perform in the process, not Tim in the form of free access to or enjoying
[22:13.120 --> 22:19.240]  the enjoyment of a right. We called that official oppression. Tim filed criminal charges against
[22:19.240 --> 22:24.920]  the judge. Now the prosecutors holding those criminal charges. That's okay. We'll get
[22:24.920 --> 22:35.960]  to that. That was a ruling on Tim's counterclaim against the city of Newark. They came to the
[22:35.960 --> 22:41.040]  claims of the city of Newark. He granted everything they asked for. Now we've asked for another
[22:41.040 --> 22:46.120]  findings effect and conclusions at law and the clock is running on receiving that. We
[22:46.120 --> 22:52.720]  expect to receive nothing because the judge really don't, doesn't think that he's subject
[22:52.720 --> 23:00.080]  to the law himself. He thinks he adjudicates the law, but the law doesn't apply to him.
[23:00.080 --> 23:02.280]  But we want to demonstrate to him that it does.
[23:02.280 --> 23:03.280]  Yes.
[23:03.280 --> 23:08.280]  I don't think they ever have anyone challenging them. I think somebody just goes in. I was
[23:08.280 --> 23:12.720]  watching everybody one by one. They just went in there as quick as they could get in there,
[23:12.720 --> 23:18.320]  make a strike a plea deal or a payment plan or something just so they could get out of
[23:18.320 --> 23:24.320]  there. They didn't have time. They were all working people. They don't want to fight.
[23:24.320 --> 23:27.400]  Nobody wants to fight. They don't have time to fight and that's what they've been banking
[23:27.400 --> 23:30.080]  on. It's been easy money for them for years.
[23:30.080 --> 23:38.240]  Yeah. And they need someone like Tim to come by and land on them like a ton of bricks. And
[23:38.240 --> 23:46.200]  the problem is, is there are elections and council members change. And that's what's
[23:46.200 --> 23:52.000]  happening now at Newark. And the council members coming in can look at this case and say, this
[23:52.000 --> 23:59.560]  is nonsense. What is going on here? Why are we trying to eliminate a tax-paying business
[23:59.560 --> 24:07.200]  in our city by these outrageous claims? And there's a very good chance this whole thing
[24:07.200 --> 24:18.160]  will get dropped. At least the claim by the city will get dropped. And if it does, then
[24:18.160 --> 24:26.360]  Tim is open to go after them from now on. But even if it doesn't, when this gets to
[24:26.360 --> 24:33.360]  the court of appeals, the court of appeals don't care about the facts. They care about
[24:33.360 --> 24:42.120]  the law. Well, they completely change their procedures in that courtroom. Same people,
[24:42.120 --> 24:48.480]  they use the same people, but they have changed their procedures, their files, their papers
[24:48.480 --> 24:53.800]  that they file and everything that goes along with it. And we've overheard the judge say
[24:53.800 --> 24:58.640]  to the court clerk something about, well, we probably need to have that in case we ever
[24:58.640 --> 25:05.280]  get audited. And he said that in your view where I could hear it too. So he knows they're
[25:05.280 --> 25:06.560]  being watched now.
[25:06.560 --> 25:13.400]  And that's part of the purpose. It doesn't, you know, 90% of the people that got their
[25:13.400 --> 25:21.080]  own issues, and this is not a primary issue for them. Tim, on the other hand, they're
[25:21.080 --> 25:28.240]  coming after him big time. This is Vandetta. So it's kind of like what I said to a district
[25:28.240 --> 25:33.320]  judge once when he asked me why I was doing this. I filed criminal charges against him,
[25:33.320 --> 25:40.880]  the sheriff and the prosecutor. And I told him, judge, you kick this soapbox up under
[25:40.880 --> 25:48.800]  my feet. You don't get the wine that I stand squally on it. They have, they have kicked
[25:48.800 --> 25:57.040]  this soapbox up under Tim's feet. This was not a fight he wanted to have. But they gave
[25:57.040 --> 26:04.760]  him a fight that was so big he couldn't avoid it. Now they get the fight. They got through
[26:04.760 --> 26:06.760]  the first part.
[26:06.760 --> 26:13.480]  On the night that we went in for the pre-trial hearing, and I had picked up the docket paper
[26:13.480 --> 26:17.840]  because she was not being very cordial to me the entire time that I had first gone up
[26:17.840 --> 26:23.240]  there when she called me in, called me up to the front. And I picked up her docket paper.
[26:23.240 --> 26:27.200]  She goes, that is my docket sheet. You can please put it down on the desk. And then she
[26:27.200 --> 26:32.000]  changed the meeting and goes, but it's public record. Anybody can look at it. And so I started
[26:32.000 --> 26:38.280]  looking at it. Well, that's one of the things we record requested was the docket sheet.
[26:38.280 --> 26:44.320]  And when my wife went in there today, she said that I'm not sure you're going to be
[26:44.320 --> 26:49.920]  able to get that docket sheet because Ashley, which is the prosecutor's name, said that
[26:49.920 --> 26:56.520]  she didn't have to give it to you. And I think that's what she said, something like that.
[26:56.520 --> 27:01.760]  Anyway, and my wife said, well, Ashley said the other night that it was public records.
[27:01.760 --> 27:07.920]  And Diane looked at her with raised eyebrows. She did. So now they're all really confused.
[27:07.920 --> 27:14.240]  Well, she said that, she said this, he says that. What's the law? Because when you say
[27:14.240 --> 27:20.480]  something, yeah, their problem is, is when they say something, Tim takes them to task
[27:20.480 --> 27:26.560]  on what they say. Yeah. Go ahead, sir.
[27:26.560 --> 27:32.920]  It's the point. Yeah, that's the point. You just, you just want, you want them not to
[27:32.920 --> 27:39.000]  try to deceive you, just to do what they're supposed to do. And that's the whole thing.
[27:39.000 --> 27:48.280]  Read the ordinance supposedly that I've violated. The first thing it says is that it's not
[27:48.280 --> 27:54.840]  registered or inspected. And then it says, and whatever else follows, whether it's an
[27:54.840 --> 28:00.680]  operable, dismantled, you know, things like that. But these vehicles were, none of them
[28:00.680 --> 28:09.000]  were dismantled. And especially this last one we got, it was registered at the time
[28:09.000 --> 28:16.000]  with antique plates. And then further on down in the ordinance, it, it requests that the
[28:16.000 --> 28:22.120]  ordinance officer can ask the owner of the vehicle to display whether or not the vehicle
[28:22.120 --> 28:30.160]  is, is operable. He never did. So he just, he kind of acquiesced that, you know, he didn't
[28:30.160 --> 28:36.960]  ask, I didn't say, regardless. So it goes to the fact that it was registered. So there
[28:36.960 --> 28:42.400]  shouldn't have been any question at all. Because how many vehicles do you go by? You see them
[28:42.400 --> 28:50.360]  registered, you ask no questions. Right? And then if you do ask questions, you, you
[28:50.360 --> 28:59.840]  cannot enforce a issue unless you have problem cause. Right. So if you ask, does that vehicle
[28:59.840 --> 29:08.560]  run now your business? Right. Now, if you want, he wants to go to a judge and get a warrant
[29:08.560 --> 29:18.120]  to authorize him to test and see if that vehicle operate runs. Well, yes, have probable cause.
[29:18.120 --> 29:25.000]  The ordinance does not say that though. It just says that the ordinance officer can ask
[29:25.000 --> 29:31.640]  for him for you to display whether or not it's operable. Well, sure. The ordinance officer
[29:31.640 --> 29:36.880]  can also ask you to stand on your head and squawk like a chicken. He can ask you to do
[29:36.880 --> 29:42.160]  anything he wants you to do. We're going back to state law then on top of that. I'm going
[29:42.160 --> 29:49.720]  back to the point that he can ask anything he wants to. Yeah. But he has no power to
[29:49.720 --> 29:56.800]  enforce. Now, if he asks you to demonstrate that it operates and you say, go scratch.
[29:56.800 --> 30:07.400]  Now he has to go to the judge and get a warrant. Put on your walking shoes, couch potatoes.
[30:07.400 --> 30:12.120]  A hike a day can keep diabetes at bay. I'm Dr. Kauffernal Brackton and in a moment I'll
[30:12.120 --> 30:18.440]  have details on how even a short stroll can lower your risk of developing diabetes. Privacy
[30:18.440 --> 30:23.760]  is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:23.760 --> 30:28.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So
[30:28.760 --> 30:35.000]  protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:35.000 --> 30:40.320]  it's worth hanging onto. This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search
[30:40.320 --> 30:48.000]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Start Page.
[30:48.000 --> 30:51.860]  Walking can do wonders for your heart, but a new study shows that even walking a few
[30:51.860 --> 30:57.120]  minutes a day lowers your chance of getting diabetes. Researchers used pedometers to
[30:57.120 --> 31:02.040]  monitor 1,800 Native Americans for a week. They found people who walked just four miles
[31:02.040 --> 31:07.560]  a day had a nearly 30% lower risk of diabetes than those who walked a mile and a half. The
[31:07.560 --> 31:12.920]  benefits held even for those who walked the least. People who took just 3,500 steps a day
[31:12.920 --> 31:17.520]  had a much lower risk of diabetes than those who hardly walked at all. So get out those
[31:17.520 --> 31:22.840]  walking shoes. Your heart and your pancreas will love you for it. I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht
[31:22.840 --> 31:48.800]  for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:48.800 --> 32:00.760]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[32:00.760 --> 32:13.760]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[32:13.760 --> 32:20.760]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[32:43.760 --> 33:06.760]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[33:13.760 --> 33:23.800]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton of Wheel of Law Radio on this Friday, the 13th day of
[33:23.800 --> 33:33.720]  April 2018. And we're going to talk to Tim in Texas. Okay, Tim. Tim, is that the process
[33:33.720 --> 33:37.760]  where the worm begins to turn?
[33:37.760 --> 33:45.560]  Well, we've still got to go to the district court so they can finish filing the remainder
[33:45.560 --> 33:54.960]  of whatever charges on top of the original $8,000 plus 5% per annum interest that they've
[33:54.960 --> 34:01.120]  already assessed to me. And then whatever's on top of that with administrative fees and
[34:01.120 --> 34:08.040]  of course attorney's fees and everything else. But we still have a baritry charge before
[34:08.040 --> 34:18.800]  the district attorney indicator or the prosecuting attorney of the municipality that has not gone
[34:18.800 --> 34:20.120]  before the grand jury.
[34:20.120 --> 34:30.760]  Yes, and we're going to convert that into a complaint against the prosecutor for shielding
[34:30.760 --> 34:36.760]  all of these public officials from prosecution and file it with the Texas Ranger.
[34:36.760 --> 34:38.760]  No, boy.
[34:38.760 --> 34:46.520]  Oh, this is going to be so much fun. Okay, here's the deal. Ron Earl, criminal district
[34:46.520 --> 34:53.720]  attorney for Travis County for 25 years. He's the guy that took out Tom DeLay, speaker
[34:53.720 --> 35:00.600]  of the House of the United States House of Representatives. The second most powerful
[35:00.600 --> 35:08.480]  political person in the United States and Ron Earl took him out with a criminal complaint
[35:08.480 --> 35:20.160]  of campaign fund manipulation. Problem. Nobody ever accused Tom DeLay of a crime. But Ron
[35:20.160 --> 35:27.120]  Earl took him out anyway. A local district attorney in Texas takes out the second highest
[35:27.120 --> 35:37.040]  political figure in the country. Ron Earl was a scoundrel and he got the state legislature
[35:37.040 --> 35:47.560]  to create a task force or a group within the prosecuting attorney's office, a public integrity
[35:47.560 --> 35:58.480]  unit. And I said, what? You can't have a public integrity unit because Article 2.03 Code of
[35:58.480 --> 36:04.800]  Criminal Procedure says the prosecuting attorney has no discretion when he's made known that
[36:04.800 --> 36:09.560]  a public official has violated the law relating to his office. He must reduce the complaint
[36:09.560 --> 36:14.960]  from an information submitted to the grand jury. So how can he have a public integrity
[36:14.960 --> 36:21.320]  unit? Well, that rocked along for a while. Finally, the legislature decided when they
[36:21.320 --> 36:25.600]  tried to take out Governor Perry with that public integrity unit, they decided this is
[36:25.600 --> 36:36.720]  a really bad idea. And they eliminated it and moved that authority to the Texas Rangers
[36:36.720 --> 36:45.040]  and required that the Texas Rangers develop a protocol. Well, prior to this, the Texas
[36:45.040 --> 36:51.800]  Ranger could not investigate a complaint against a public official, could not take a complaint
[36:51.800 --> 36:58.360]  against a public official or investigate a complaint without the express written permission
[36:58.360 --> 37:05.400]  of the director of the Department of Public Safety himself. Well, the legislature moved
[37:05.400 --> 37:11.920]  this authority to the Rangers so that the director would no longer have authority to
[37:11.920 --> 37:19.000]  tell them when they could perform this duty and whatnot because there's no longer discretionary.
[37:19.000 --> 37:26.200]  And requested that the Department of Public Safety develop a protocol. And they did. They
[37:26.200 --> 37:35.920]  developed this protocol that said that the Texas Ranger had to request permission from
[37:35.920 --> 37:44.200]  the prosecuting attorney to take or investigate a complaint against a public official. What
[37:44.200 --> 37:55.040]  they're trying to do is keep political control of prosecutions. So we go to the Texas Ranger
[37:55.040 --> 38:05.640]  with a complaint against the district attorney. Okay, Bubba, what do you do now? The last
[38:05.640 --> 38:10.120]  time I filed a complaint against a public official and the Ranger took it to the prosecutor
[38:10.120 --> 38:14.120]  attorney, I filed criminal charges against the Ranger and the director of Department
[38:14.120 --> 38:15.120]  of Public Safety.
[38:15.120 --> 38:21.520]  All right. Well, if you remember what I told you that the district attorney said when we
[38:21.520 --> 38:29.080]  dropped off the paperwork, which was nice and neat, all separate packets for each Ranger,
[38:29.080 --> 38:34.040]  he said, well, I'll take a look at it. He signed a paper saying that he'd received it.
[38:34.040 --> 38:38.880]  And then he said, and well, it'll go for the grand jury if I deem that it's, you know,
[38:38.880 --> 38:43.640]  it's valuable, but I think you had stepped in there a couple of months after that, sat
[38:43.640 --> 38:47.320]  there and visited him with him and said, hey, what's this right here? As you saw the
[38:47.320 --> 38:53.640]  box of all the envelopes, and you kind of had a little discussion there. And I can't
[38:53.640 --> 39:00.160]  remember what you said that you had told him that the prosecutor had done, but he kind
[39:00.160 --> 39:07.240]  of raised his eyebrows at that. So I'm wondering if he's trying to figure out a method, hoping
[39:07.240 --> 39:11.280]  that I will just go away.
[39:11.280 --> 39:21.360]  That's probably exactly what he's doing. But I think knowing Greg Lowry, he's just stalling.
[39:21.360 --> 39:23.240]  He knows I won't go away.
[39:23.240 --> 39:28.280]  He's nice, you know, and he's got plenty on his hands, you know, because the county's
[39:28.280 --> 39:31.200]  getting bigger with population.
[39:31.200 --> 39:39.320]  And I have known Greg Lowry for over 20 years. And it is my opinion that Greg Lowry, if
[39:39.320 --> 39:46.480]  there is any prosecutor in the state of Texas who has his moral center in the right place,
[39:46.480 --> 39:49.240]  it's Greg Lowry.
[39:49.240 --> 39:57.280]  But in this case, he's stuck with a political conundrum. And he knows he's dealing with
[39:57.280 --> 40:04.280]  somebody who doesn't care that he has a political conundrum, that in fact, if I give him a problem,
[40:04.280 --> 40:12.800]  I will think it's funny. So he can't complain to me about it. And here's his problem. He's
[40:12.800 --> 40:17.800]  had these complaints and he did not give them to the grandeur.
[40:17.800 --> 40:24.200]  So now we file a complaint against him with the local Texas Ranger. And this is the ranger
[40:24.200 --> 40:30.320]  that I've already filed criminal charges against. The ranger is not going to be a happy camper.
[40:30.320 --> 40:37.240]  No, he used to be the Texas Ranger in the Decatur office who is now the sheriff's deputy
[40:37.240 --> 40:40.240]  or the sheriff of the county.
[40:40.240 --> 40:48.240]  No, Lane Akin is now the sheriff. He was never a... Oh, yeah, he was a ranger for this area
[40:48.240 --> 40:57.760]  because about 10 years ago, I took him on, they were trying to fire a city of Decatur
[40:57.760 --> 41:04.160]  police officer because the police officer was one of us. And we took him on and I kind
[41:04.160 --> 41:10.920]  of wiped the floor with Lane Akin. But he's now the sheriff. He's an ex-Texas ranger.
[41:10.920 --> 41:16.080]  So he'll understand the problem, but we don't care. He doesn't have anything to do with
[41:16.080 --> 41:24.760]  this. The current ranger is going to have a problem because we'll file another... This
[41:24.760 --> 41:28.960]  time we didn't file a crime... Tico has complained against him last time, but we will this time
[41:28.960 --> 41:34.600]  because I didn't have all that in place yet. But we'll file a criminal against him, criminally
[41:34.600 --> 41:41.320]  against the director for setting the policy that sends him to the prosecutor's attorney
[41:41.320 --> 41:43.440]  and we'll file against the prosecutor's attorney.
[41:43.440 --> 41:46.440]  Oh, boy.
[41:46.440 --> 41:49.440]  See how that works out for him.
[41:49.440 --> 41:50.440]  Yeah.
[41:50.440 --> 41:51.440]  And then we...
[41:51.440 --> 41:52.440]  Stay working.
[41:52.440 --> 41:53.440]  Right?
[41:53.440 --> 41:58.280]  We have more complaints coming. Criminal complained against the district judge.
[41:58.280 --> 41:59.280]  Right.
[41:59.280 --> 42:00.280]  Well...
[42:00.280 --> 42:04.440]  When this first happened, I filed first degree felony aggravated assault charges against
[42:04.440 --> 42:06.440]  the district judge.
[42:06.440 --> 42:07.440]  Yeah.
[42:07.440 --> 42:14.120]  And I got mine to the grand jury. But then I've known Greg for 20 years and he knows
[42:14.120 --> 42:20.640]  me and he knows I know my law. And he knows I don't push.
[42:20.640 --> 42:22.360]  Yeah.
[42:22.360 --> 42:28.080]  So now he needs to find somebody else that doesn't push. And when you come back after
[42:28.080 --> 42:33.000]  him, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out.
[42:33.000 --> 42:34.000]  Yeah.
[42:34.000 --> 42:45.360]  Well, the... Back to the case at hand with not the one in district court, but the one...
[42:45.360 --> 42:51.520]  In the citation that they have cited me for, this vehicle that they cited me for was one
[42:51.520 --> 42:58.960]  of the first eight that they said was unregistered and inoperable, named them junk vehicles.
[42:58.960 --> 43:04.240]  And I had... Before we had gone to court, I had gotten the thing registered with antique
[43:04.240 --> 43:09.920]  plates, but they didn't care. They just went ahead and prosecuted me on all eight vehicles.
[43:09.920 --> 43:20.920]  So on this one, they noted on the citation that says original offense was March 31, 2017.
[43:20.920 --> 43:27.120]  So that tells me that they've kind of opened the door to themselves to allow me to bring
[43:27.120 --> 43:36.840]  in to testimony about the original eight vehicles, wouldn't it? So that I can do something on
[43:36.840 --> 43:38.840]  record, perhaps?
[43:38.840 --> 43:45.720]  No, I don't know that they would be relevant to this single charge. Hang on.
[43:45.720 --> 43:46.720]  The single charge.
[43:46.720 --> 43:51.600]  We're going to break... Hold on a minute. Hold on a minute. We're going to break. Randy
[43:51.600 --> 43:58.560]  Kelton, we'll radio our call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[43:58.560 --> 44:04.840]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by
[44:04.840 --> 44:09.520]  delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. We provide a
[44:09.520 --> 44:13.520]  wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and
[44:13.520 --> 44:17.800]  precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions
[44:17.800 --> 44:22.480]  for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited
[44:22.480 --> 44:26.680]  metal stealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find
[44:26.680 --> 44:31.280]  it. In addition, we carry popular young jevity products such as beyond hanging tangerine
[44:31.280 --> 44:35.840]  and pollen birds. We also offer one-world way, mountain house storeable foods, Berkey
[44:35.840 --> 44:41.120]  water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. We broker metals IRA accounts and
[44:41.120 --> 44:48.160]  we also accept big coins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6404. We're located at 7304
[44:48.160 --> 44:52.120]  Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through
[44:52.120 --> 45:01.280]  Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6404.
[45:01.280 --> 45:06.600]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris
[45:06.600 --> 45:14.080]  Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[45:14.080 --> 45:19.920]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[45:19.920 --> 45:24.840]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[45:24.840 --> 45:31.080]  by step course, and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[45:31.080 --> 45:37.120]  with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn
[45:37.120 --> 45:42.000]  what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[45:42.000 --> 45:48.320]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[45:48.320 --> 45:55.600]  for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[45:55.600 --> 46:02.600]  on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:25.600 --> 46:43.240]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this, the 13th day of April, 2013,
[46:43.240 --> 46:48.960]  this Friday the 13th, and we're talking to Tim in Texas. Okay, Tim?
[46:48.960 --> 47:03.520]  You said 2013. Did I say 2013? 2018. I'm getting brain-dead. I'm sorry, man. You weren't supposed
[47:03.520 --> 47:14.000]  to mention that. I'm sorry, man. It's too funny. Well, you got to go to midnight, man,
[47:14.000 --> 47:23.720]  so you can splash some water on your face. Okay, so now we're at the point where we really
[47:23.720 --> 47:29.920]  start going after these guys. I was going over some of the bar grievances in judicial
[47:29.920 --> 47:35.600]  conduct complaints and T-Close complaints that you were filing earlier. We need to get
[47:35.600 --> 47:47.320]  those in, and now every week we need to file one, file a set of these. I'm not sure how
[47:47.320 --> 47:56.160]  to get after the code enforcement officer. We need a way to sting him.
[47:56.160 --> 48:03.320]  Well, here's my thinking. I called when Diane said that they didn't have to give us or that
[48:03.320 --> 48:11.040]  they did not possess the inspection reports that the code enforcement officer does. I
[48:11.040 --> 48:15.720]  called my friend on the council and told him, and I says, since you're on councilman, don't
[48:15.720 --> 48:19.920]  you have access to his records? Can't you just go in there and say, yeah, I want to
[48:19.920 --> 48:24.760]  see his file. I want to see what he, because he said that ultimately he goes back with
[48:24.760 --> 48:34.280]  Diane, the administrator, and then she determines who gets the ticket. Okay, not him. So it's
[48:34.280 --> 48:40.280]  not procedure. It's, you know, it's like they're playing it by gut.
[48:40.280 --> 48:49.120]  So where does the city manager have the authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion?
[48:49.120 --> 48:55.920]  Well, that's what I'm getting at. So you would have to say, you'd have to, you know,
[48:55.920 --> 49:01.280]  you'd have to probably subpoena the councilman and say, did you have a discussion with the
[49:01.280 --> 49:07.520]  code enforcement officer exactly what was discussed, you know, and go into about procedure
[49:07.520 --> 49:12.000]  and did he say this and did he say that, you know, they could say, well, the councilman's
[49:12.000 --> 49:23.200]  lying, I guess, you know, but okay, reports. So the court enforcement officer goes out
[49:23.200 --> 49:30.960]  and he writes up what he perceives to be violations of law, right? He brings those to the city
[49:30.960 --> 49:42.800]  manager and the city manager decides whether or not to pursue criminal prosecution. Yes.
[49:42.800 --> 49:48.440]  Okay, Tim, when I, when I questioned him about that, when I asked him to go in and look at
[49:48.440 --> 49:54.600]  the reports because of what they had told us, he said, well, it wasn't exactly like that,
[49:54.600 --> 49:58.480]  but that's what he was alluding to. Because I asked him specifically, well, how do you
[49:58.480 --> 50:03.720]  know, because he said we would drive by people's houses that I knew had junk cars there and
[50:03.720 --> 50:09.680]  he would just drive right by them. He wouldn't leave, you know, he wasn't, and he saw the
[50:09.680 --> 50:14.920]  cars, he knew that they were there. It was obvious. Wait, hold on. Does the code enforcement
[50:14.920 --> 50:24.320]  officer have a citation book? Yes. That's what he wrote me was a citation. Is that citation
[50:24.320 --> 50:40.800]  book numbered? Yes. Mine was 0-40000-1. Then we put in a request for all citations for
[50:40.800 --> 50:49.680]  citation numbers from this number to this number. Do we want just junk or do we want
[50:49.680 --> 50:56.560]  all ordnance violations? We don't care. We want to see which ones were prosecuted. Okay.
[50:56.560 --> 51:05.600]  And for each one that was not prosecuted, we want to know why. It is a code enforcement
[51:05.600 --> 51:11.400]  officer's job to enforce the code. So his course code enforcement officer fills out
[51:11.400 --> 51:23.040]  a government document that, according to his own statement, does not have to be signed
[51:23.040 --> 51:30.040]  by him and therefore it is presumed to be signed under oath. If he fills out this government
[51:30.040 --> 51:36.640]  document, then that is a criminal complaint. Well, I don't think that's how they're doing
[51:36.640 --> 51:55.440]  things. I'm not concerned about it. Okay. Okay. Where is that required? Okay. Where
[51:55.440 --> 52:04.080]  he has reason to believe that a violation occurred. We want to see all of those citations
[52:04.080 --> 52:13.080]  written. Then we want to see all of the notices sent to the person who was accused. That's
[52:13.080 --> 52:17.520]  what we were talking about, an inspection report. And they said that they're not available.
[52:17.520 --> 52:26.920]  Oh, is that a fact, Jack? Well, let me see exactly what it says. The word has everything
[52:26.920 --> 52:34.080]  to do when it comes to these things. It says, please be advised, an inspection report for
[52:34.080 --> 52:39.640]  the dates also a copy of the document. It does not exist. It's what it says. An inspection
[52:39.640 --> 52:47.560]  report does not exist. That looks crazy. So are they required to create an inspection
[52:47.560 --> 52:53.640]  report? Well, that's the thing. Yeah, I may have to call it something else because somehow,
[52:53.640 --> 52:59.120]  so what we'll do, I'll get my friend, Cody, on the council to go by and say, what do you
[52:59.120 --> 53:05.520]  call that? Okay, that's what we need and let him get it. And he can make copies on his
[53:05.520 --> 53:12.520]  own and then he can give me the copies. I don't have to go through public records request.
[53:12.520 --> 53:18.400]  Well, what we know we want public records request. I know it, but I don't know what
[53:18.400 --> 53:24.040]  to call it. That's what I'm getting at. Yeah, okay. Well, we can get to that. I have a special
[53:24.040 --> 53:32.480]  request called a scope and substantive content request. Okay. That request lists all of the
[53:32.480 --> 53:43.400]  items in the open records in the open government statute 5x2 government code that are specifically
[53:43.400 --> 53:52.120]  designated open for public inspection. And one of the things that's specifically listed
[53:52.120 --> 54:00.880]  is the names of all of the documents, all of the records kept, the medium in which they're
[54:00.880 --> 54:09.040]  kept and methods for requesting those records. It doesn't ask for any content in the record.
[54:09.040 --> 54:14.880]  It asks for the names of the records, how they kept, where they kept and how to request
[54:14.880 --> 54:23.560]  it. I had a captain on the sheriff's department spend eight hours with me going through every
[54:23.560 --> 54:33.120]  record they kept. Say, you guys want to jerk me around with the artist works out for you.
[54:33.120 --> 54:38.920]  And this is the only one who was smart enough to do it right. But if they don't want to
[54:38.920 --> 54:46.720]  give you the record name, we send in the scope and content request. Well, then we ask them
[54:46.720 --> 54:55.400]  which one of these contains an inspection report. Then we ask for all of those. That's
[54:55.400 --> 55:01.040]  how we get there. See, for them to say it does not exist, they could have, they could
[55:01.040 --> 55:06.400]  have sent an email and say, what do you mean by inspection report? They could have done
[55:06.400 --> 55:13.320]  that. But it just shows they're stalling for time. And they're doing so, they're like,
[55:13.320 --> 55:18.200]  they're calling the prosecutor who's already realized that I have charges against her before
[55:18.200 --> 55:24.720]  the DEA and the grand jury. So she's not happy with me. And she even, you know, that's another
[55:24.720 --> 55:30.000]  thing we didn't bring up is that she objected to saying that there was something on that
[55:30.000 --> 55:34.480]  special appearance that we had presented before the judge and she was objecting because
[55:34.480 --> 55:40.000]  we didn't have certain things on there. They were on there. She just hadn't taken the time
[55:40.000 --> 55:41.480]  to read it.
[55:41.480 --> 55:51.600]  Yeah, that's in the record. Did she, did she file a written response to it? No, she filed
[55:51.600 --> 55:58.040]  nothing. Okay. Anytime they don't file a written response, you object to them raising any objection
[55:58.040 --> 56:04.600]  to what's in there. Well, but the thing about it is that the judge didn't read it. Yeah.
[56:04.600 --> 56:09.680]  Three lines and then said, tell me what this means. And I says, well, you know, that's
[56:09.680 --> 56:13.720]  when I said, well, if she's not going to tell me what you're charging me with and explain
[56:13.720 --> 56:18.200]  it to me as far as the license attorney and your license attorney, what makes you think
[56:18.200 --> 56:26.440]  that I'm going to sit here and explain to you what this legal document said. And I did
[56:26.440 --> 56:31.080]  it in a very nice, calm voice, you know, but they knew what I meant. He goes, well, if
[56:31.080 --> 56:36.720]  you want me to rule in your favor, you'll explain to me what it says. I said, no, I
[56:36.720 --> 56:42.920]  refrain. I'll stand on the document. That's exactly what I said.
[56:42.920 --> 56:50.520]  Good. And I listened to the tape. Tim did that very well. He never broke tone. He was
[56:50.520 --> 56:57.920]  just deadpan level. And, you know, there's something I don't talk about often on the
[56:57.920 --> 57:03.840]  air. And it's this little document I've written up called the verbal theory. And it's really
[57:03.840 --> 57:13.080]  a tool about how to make people crazy. It goes to how you react and respond to overt
[57:13.080 --> 57:22.080]  stimuli. When you don't give someone a response that they expect, it causes an internal pattern
[57:22.080 --> 57:28.360]  interruption. It makes them a little bit crazy. And Tim was doing that to them. They were
[57:28.360 --> 57:34.160]  expecting Tim to be getting all excited and frustrated and angry. And he didn't do any
[57:34.160 --> 57:41.760]  of that kind of stuff. And they smartmouthed him and were aggressive with him and he just
[57:41.760 --> 57:48.280]  ignored it. The judge demanded that he do something and he just refused. And it put
[57:48.280 --> 57:54.440]  him off their game. They're sitting there wondering, what does this guy know that I
[57:54.440 --> 57:59.480]  don't? What's he setting me up for? Because they were sure he was setting them up for
[57:59.480 --> 58:06.640]  something. And when I listened to the tape, I could not have been more pleased. Forget
[58:06.640 --> 58:16.720]  more guys out here doing this. We'll get our courts back. Hang on. You get one gold star
[58:16.720 --> 58:22.240]  and that's all. Now half a gold star. I don't want to overdo this. Hang on, I'm about to
[58:22.240 --> 58:29.320]  go to break. Randy Kelton, we have our radio. Our call in number is 512-646-1984. We have
[58:29.320 --> 58:34.640]  an open board tonight and it's unusual on a Saturday night, this lady in the evening.
[58:34.640 --> 58:39.480]  This is the only way it builds up. So have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll
[58:39.480 --> 58:54.080]  be right back. Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.080 --> 58:59.680]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.680 --> 59:04.400]  can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:04.400 --> 59:09.840]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that
[59:09.840 --> 59:14.680]  will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three
[59:14.680 --> 59:20.480]  volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of
[59:20.480 --> 59:26.080]  the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how
[59:26.080 --> 59:32.280]  to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements
[59:32.280 --> 59:45.200]  of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102
[59:45.200 --> 01:00:02.680]  or visit us online at bf a dot o r g. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.680 --> 01:00:07.720]  The Falling East Flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdowns, providing you jelly
[01:00:07.720 --> 01:00:15.560]  bulletins for the commodity market. Today's history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:15.560 --> 01:00:26.560]  into the tides of the alternative. Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold
[01:00:26.560 --> 01:00:35.360]  $1,353.22 in ounce, silver $16.68 in ounce, Texas crude $65.51 of barrel, bitcoins at
[01:00:35.360 --> 01:00:44.960]  $6,902.19, ethereums at $420.80, bitcoin cash at $652.90, and finally light coins
[01:00:44.960 --> 01:00:58.960]  at $114.34, a crypto coin. Today in history, the year 1968, President
[01:00:58.960 --> 01:01:04.200]  Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited private businesses
[01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:08.800]  from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It also
[01:01:08.800 --> 01:01:13.640]  prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public
[01:01:13.640 --> 01:01:24.040]  schools, and employment, and public accommodations for places of business. Today in history.
[01:01:24.040 --> 01:01:28.040]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:01:28.040 --> 01:01:32.360]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:01:32.360 --> 01:01:36.800]  is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, by the
[01:01:36.800 --> 01:01:41.520]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:01:41.520 --> 01:01:46.360]  evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:01:46.360 --> 01:01:50.440]  to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:01:50.440 --> 01:01:55.040]  be coming in nice and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:01:55.040 --> 01:01:59.480]  with a gas-killing animal who kills its people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:01:59.480 --> 01:02:04.560]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[01:02:04.560 --> 01:02:09.680]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[01:02:09.680 --> 01:02:14.000]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:18.840]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[01:02:18.840 --> 01:02:22.880]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and
[01:02:22.880 --> 01:02:27.800]  anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with
[01:02:27.800 --> 01:02:32.560]  ISIS being one of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[01:02:32.560 --> 01:02:37.920]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook
[01:02:37.920 --> 01:02:42.240]  that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[01:02:42.240 --> 01:02:47.160]  has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile
[01:02:47.160 --> 01:02:51.160]  strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:02:51.160 --> 01:02:58.160]  This was Kirk Brody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:21.160 --> 01:03:33.160]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton from Rula La Radio, and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:03:33.160 --> 01:03:39.160]  We have an open call board, so if you have a question or comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[01:03:39.160 --> 01:03:46.440]  Okay, Tim? Yes, sir. On the special appearance on Senator
[01:03:46.440 --> 01:03:55.960]  Reedness, it talks about no-commercial nexus, and it references the Texas Transportation
[01:03:55.960 --> 01:04:03.440]  Code. What exactly is, does it have to come under the, uh...
[01:04:03.440 --> 01:04:11.720]  No, that's a mistake. I thought I had taken that out of this one. This was actually written
[01:04:11.720 --> 01:04:21.440]  for a traffic issue. But I have to go back and read the whole thing. The whole point
[01:04:21.440 --> 01:04:28.760]  of it is, is it challenges the authority of the court. It is, in effect, a subject-media
[01:04:28.760 --> 01:04:35.120]  jurisdiction challenge, and in the first one we filed, I had taken the commercial nexus
[01:04:35.120 --> 01:04:42.120]  out. I didn't realize, I thought I had. I didn't realize it was in this one.
[01:04:42.120 --> 01:04:48.400]  But it's in no-commercial nexus. And, and commercial nexus is still relevant
[01:04:48.400 --> 01:04:59.800]  here because it is our claim that, in the constitutional challenge, that the, the legislature
[01:04:59.800 --> 01:05:10.120]  has no authority to delegate their, legislate their law-making power to a corporation, that
[01:05:10.120 --> 01:05:18.880]  a corporation can issue a ordinance. But that ordinance only applies to employees of the
[01:05:18.880 --> 01:05:28.480]  corporation or someone who has, is in a, a contractual agreement with the corporation
[01:05:28.480 --> 01:05:35.840]  wherein they agreed, agreed to abide by all of the corporate canons. Because, in effect,
[01:05:35.840 --> 01:05:40.880]  an ordinance is merely a corporate canon. So there would have to be a commercial nexus
[01:05:40.880 --> 01:05:50.560]  with the municipality in order for the municipality to be able to enforce the municipal ordinance
[01:05:50.560 --> 01:06:01.280]  against an ordinary person. Otherwise, if it's not a corporate rule or canon, then it
[01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:09.040]  is a general law. And there's no authority in the constitution for anyone to pass a
[01:06:09.040 --> 01:06:15.320]  general law that's applicable to all of the public other than the state legislature. And
[01:06:15.320 --> 01:06:21.160]  that's our argument. Right. I'd, I'd have to reread that, but it's, I think I rewrote
[01:06:21.160 --> 01:06:26.120]  that one so that, that argument was correct that it, does, does that one say it goes to
[01:06:26.120 --> 01:06:32.720]  transportation code? Which part? The nexus. Does any, does any part of it say it goes
[01:06:32.720 --> 01:06:38.680]  to transportation code? Just the, just the nexus it does. Okay. It says. The nexus. Civil
[01:06:38.680 --> 01:06:48.920]  procedure. 45. Okay. 45 is municipal courts, municipal JP courts. It doesn't go to transportation
[01:06:48.920 --> 01:06:56.880]  code. And then on the pleading, did no crime alleged, the Insta complaint states that the
[01:06:56.880 --> 01:07:02.600]  vehicle, oh, you called it a vehicle. Eddie would have corrected you on that. Is currently
[01:07:02.600 --> 01:07:07.160]  properly licensed, which amounts to the admission that the vehicle does not meet the statutory
[01:07:07.160 --> 01:07:16.520]  law. It is, it is a vehicle when it's licensed. Okay. All right. It may not be operated as
[01:07:16.520 --> 01:07:23.560]  a vehicle, but it's licensed as a vehicle. Gotcha. That's where they got it, huh? Tell
[01:07:23.560 --> 01:07:31.160]  Eddie to take that one and stick it. I haven't picked on Eddie in a long time. I need to
[01:07:31.160 --> 01:07:37.640]  call into his show and give him a hard time. Well, another thing that I'm sitting and noticing
[01:07:37.640 --> 01:07:42.400]  on this, uh, special parents that we give them, it says city of Newark versus Philip
[01:07:42.400 --> 01:07:50.640]  Timothy Pixler. And, um, that's because I guess of the citation that they've given me,
[01:07:50.640 --> 01:07:57.360]  which I used to think that it said state of Texas, but I don't have anything like that.
[01:07:57.360 --> 01:08:05.560]  I just have, uh, that they had written me this code, code and ordinance violation notice,
[01:08:05.560 --> 01:08:19.520]  um, along with the, uh, notice of violation. Is there an information file? No, but I asked
[01:08:19.520 --> 01:08:24.800]  Eddie specifically because there was a thing about the difference between indictment information
[01:08:24.800 --> 01:08:33.160]  and complaints. And Eddie said that the court, the Texas courts have consistently claimed
[01:08:33.160 --> 01:08:39.040]  that a complaint is the same as an information, but that is totally against the Texas constitution
[01:08:39.040 --> 01:08:48.800]  and the, uh, code of civil rules, uh, CCR is what he called it, whatever that is. So
[01:08:48.800 --> 01:08:57.600]  CCR, the, the, the courts recognize that, that the complaint is as good as an information
[01:08:57.600 --> 01:09:05.440]  and you've, okay, hold on. Let me explain complaining information. A complaint is intended
[01:09:05.440 --> 01:09:14.120]  to be written by a non lawyer, by a regular citizen. They're not expected to have any
[01:09:14.120 --> 01:09:22.560]  special legal knowledge. When a prosecutor gets a complaint, he is to take the complaint
[01:09:22.560 --> 01:09:29.560]  and convert it to an information. What an information is intended to be, excuse me,
[01:09:29.560 --> 01:09:36.080]  is a complaint in regular form, a complaint that meets the statutory requirements. For
[01:09:36.080 --> 01:09:42.960]  instance, all criminal complaints in Texas shall run in the name of the state of Texas
[01:09:42.960 --> 01:09:47.840]  in the name of and under the authority of the state of Texas. If you look at my complaint
[01:09:47.840 --> 01:09:54.720]  blanks, it says in the name of and under the authority of the state of Texas, that's the
[01:09:54.720 --> 01:10:03.480]  statutory requirement. The complaint must state that the complainant has reason to believe
[01:10:03.480 --> 01:10:13.640]  and does believe that the defendant violated a certain statute. Those two are mandatory.
[01:10:13.640 --> 01:10:19.960]  The Texas, I think, is the only one that has that mandatory wording. So when an ordinary
[01:10:19.960 --> 01:10:25.760]  citizen says, this dirty rotten rascal, he did this, that, and the other, the prosecutor
[01:10:25.760 --> 01:10:34.240]  then takes that affidavit and makes up information based on the complaint. So the complaint doesn't
[01:10:34.240 --> 01:10:41.640]  have to be in proper form. The information is the complaint in proper form. And an information
[01:10:41.640 --> 01:10:50.840]  is required, except in traffic cases. The prosecution can proceed on the complaint
[01:10:50.840 --> 01:10:57.160]  alone, but this is not a traffic case. Right. So here's what I asked, Eddie, is this okay
[01:10:57.160 --> 01:11:02.280]  if I read this? It won't take a second. I said, is a complaint as good, because I was
[01:11:02.280 --> 01:11:07.760]  getting confused between different information. Is a complaint as good as an information in
[01:11:07.760 --> 01:11:14.120]  a Class C misdemeanor ordinance violation, or does Article 5, Section 12B hold to it
[01:11:14.120 --> 01:11:19.840]  has to be an information and not simply a complaint, but took a day for him to get back
[01:11:19.840 --> 01:11:24.840]  to me. But he said, the courts have a rule that a complaint alone is all that is required
[01:11:24.840 --> 01:11:31.840]  in municipal and JP courts, which directly violates both the CCT, that's what he said,
[01:11:31.840 --> 01:11:32.840]  CCT.
[01:11:32.840 --> 01:11:33.840]  Code of criminal procedure.
[01:11:33.840 --> 01:11:40.280]  Yes, and the Texas Constitution. So I wrote, so how do you use it to your advantage? Corruption
[01:11:40.280 --> 01:11:45.760]  at its best, I suppose, shaking my head. He put, make the record of the rights violations
[01:11:45.760 --> 01:11:51.120]  involved in this matter rule breaking, so you have it for the federal lawsuit. So it
[01:11:51.120 --> 01:11:55.640]  looks like everybody's pointing me towards a federal lawsuit, but I've had people tell
[01:11:55.640 --> 01:12:06.680]  me, they said, I think that's Title 42, 42 U.S. Code 1983. 83. But they said, are you
[01:12:06.680 --> 01:12:13.760]  sure you're ready for this? I said, well, of course not. So if I were to take it to
[01:12:13.760 --> 01:12:22.800]  the federal court, is there, go ahead. You're too soon. We're setting the record. We're
[01:12:22.800 --> 01:12:30.160]  setting the record. It's okay. Yeah. We're giving the state every opportunity to violate
[01:12:30.160 --> 01:12:38.160]  every law that they can. And this is the problem most people make when they go after government
[01:12:38.160 --> 01:12:45.520]  agencies or public officials. They jump too soon. The first time the agency or official
[01:12:45.520 --> 01:12:49.920]  does something the person perceives to be inappropriate, they want to jump to the federal
[01:12:49.920 --> 01:12:58.760]  courts and beat them up. And I'm saying, hold on here. You don't have enough. The federal
[01:12:58.760 --> 01:13:06.720]  courts are going to say, okay, this got me to an error. That does not indicate an ongoing
[01:13:06.720 --> 01:13:13.360]  pattern of intentional abuse. Right. Give me something more to sink my legal teeth
[01:13:13.360 --> 01:13:18.480]  into. Then we come back and say, they did this, they did this, they did this, they did
[01:13:18.480 --> 01:13:23.240]  this, they did this, they did this. I went to the court of appeals, they did this, this
[01:13:23.240 --> 01:13:28.800]  and this. I went to the state supreme, they did this, this and this. Now you have a track
[01:13:28.800 --> 01:13:35.680]  record that shows an ongoing system of abuse. Now you've got something the feds can sink
[01:13:35.680 --> 01:13:39.680]  the teeth into. So we are setting the record.
[01:13:39.680 --> 01:13:47.080]  Well, there's a whole group of people across the United States that are, they're stating
[01:13:47.080 --> 01:13:54.600]  that the 16th amendment, that if you're a 16th amendment citizen, then you basically
[01:13:54.600 --> 01:14:00.120]  have lost your right. I think that it's the 16th amendment. No, not the 16th, excuse me,
[01:14:00.120 --> 01:14:06.440]  the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment, they're claiming, and the 14th amendment is the one
[01:14:06.440 --> 01:14:14.400]  that gives us the right to claim due process. Right. So it's kind of, that's when I saw
[01:14:14.400 --> 01:14:23.640]  this. I don't care if I'm a citizen or not. It does make any difference. Right. Whether
[01:14:23.640 --> 01:14:32.040]  you're a citizen in the United States, an expatriate from another country and illegal
[01:14:32.040 --> 01:14:44.040]  alien makes no difference. Constitution and laws apply anyway. So I don't, I never, I've
[01:14:44.040 --> 01:14:51.120]  heard this for 10 years, people making these arguments and I keep saying the same thing.
[01:14:51.120 --> 01:15:02.200]  So what? No, they get all up in arms. Well, okay, so what? How does that affect due process?
[01:15:02.200 --> 01:15:08.440]  I can't find where it does. Most of it's coming from them just not wanting to pay income
[01:15:08.440 --> 01:15:14.520]  tax. That and not wanting to do the whole day. Okay. Sometimes I talk about preaching
[01:15:14.520 --> 01:15:23.120]  to the church of the malcontents. They don't want to follow any rules. So they tend to
[01:15:23.120 --> 01:15:30.240]  look for things that support what they already want to believe. Yes. And doesn't work well
[01:15:30.240 --> 01:15:37.360]  that way. We don't need to do that. Okay. It takes a little more work, a little more
[01:15:37.360 --> 01:15:46.880]  research to find the law that fits your remedy. Yeah. But we cannot, these public officials
[01:15:46.880 --> 01:15:54.440]  screw up everything. It's not hard to find remedy. They just cannot bring themselves
[01:15:54.440 --> 01:16:01.160]  to do it right. When they bring up the universal commercial code and things like that, is that,
[01:16:01.160 --> 01:16:10.600]  is that play into our benefit at all? No. That's really just the trade business, doesn't
[01:16:10.600 --> 01:16:17.600]  it? That's rules of, that's contract law. Yeah. And we're not under contract law. We're
[01:16:17.600 --> 01:16:22.720]  under penal code. For the most part, when you get criminal charges against us, we're
[01:16:22.720 --> 01:16:31.120]  under the penal code. Uniform commercial code does not apply. Right. A lot of confusion.
[01:16:31.120 --> 01:16:36.760]  Out there. And if you wonder, if these people are just ignorant or if they're just not.
[01:16:36.760 --> 01:16:44.040]  Well, a lot of, we get a lot of, okay, I'm getting a bunch of calls up. So we're getting
[01:16:44.040 --> 01:16:49.560]  a lot of, we get a lot of people who study law and they look for what they want to find.
[01:16:49.560 --> 01:16:54.040]  And when they find something that looks like what they want, they focus on that and don't
[01:16:54.040 --> 01:17:00.400]  pay any attention to anything else. You need to study how all of the law works. I love
[01:17:00.400 --> 01:17:04.720]  logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:17:04.720 --> 01:17:08.720]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fake. I'd be
[01:17:08.720 --> 01:17:13.640]  lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to
[01:17:13.640 --> 01:17:17.480]  volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:17:17.480 --> 01:17:23.640]  to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:23.640 --> 01:17:28.160]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. We'd order them in your supplies
[01:17:28.160 --> 01:17:34.800]  or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to logosregualnetwork.com.
[01:17:34.800 --> 01:17:40.160]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use
[01:17:40.160 --> 01:17:46.160]  that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do I have to do anything different
[01:17:46.160 --> 01:17:52.520]  when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing
[01:17:52.520 --> 01:17:59.400]  anything or spending any money, this is perfect. Thank you so much. We are logos. Happy holidays,
[01:17:59.400 --> 01:18:05.680]  logos. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.680 --> 01:18:10.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[01:18:10.200 --> 01:18:15.120]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[01:18:15.120 --> 01:18:19.960]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[01:18:19.960 --> 01:18:25.360]  rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:18:25.360 --> 01:18:30.040]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:18:30.040 --> 01:18:35.280]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris Proven
[01:18:35.280 --> 01:18:40.680]  Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available
[01:18:40.680 --> 01:18:46.040]  as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael
[01:18:46.040 --> 01:18:52.720]  Mearris banner or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email
[01:18:52.720 --> 01:19:20.400]  m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:20.400 --> 01:19:35.520]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio and we're talking to Tim in Texas.
[01:19:35.520 --> 01:19:40.120]  Tim, I kind of need to move along. We've got a couple of more callers and only three
[01:19:40.120 --> 01:19:46.640]  more segments. We'll get a hold of it. Yeah, we've spent a lot of time on this, but it's
[01:19:46.640 --> 01:19:50.560]  getting interesting. We're getting to the good part. Okay, thank you, Tim. Now I'm
[01:19:50.560 --> 01:19:57.800]  going to go to Sonny in Georgia. Hello, Sonny. Hello, Randy. How are you doing? I am doing
[01:19:57.800 --> 01:20:09.720]  good. What do you have for us today? Well, I've got a couple of questions. One is,
[01:20:09.720 --> 01:20:20.600]  is the judge deemed to know the law? Because I've seen some case law where they've tried
[01:20:20.600 --> 01:20:26.120]  to make the case that the judge is not deemed to know the law, but it almost seems like
[01:20:26.120 --> 01:20:33.960]  it's kind of impossible to really have that position. Yes, it is. The judge is not deemed
[01:20:33.960 --> 01:20:43.240]  to know the law. What the judge must do is determine the facts in accordance with the
[01:20:43.240 --> 01:20:50.480]  rules of evidence, then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case. It's
[01:20:50.480 --> 01:20:57.400]  not the duty or responsibility of the judge to go out and find the law. The litigants
[01:20:57.400 --> 01:21:07.040]  must bring the law to the court. Then the court must properly apply the law to the facts.
[01:21:07.040 --> 01:21:13.480]  If you don't bring him the law he needs, he can't rule in your favor. This goes to some
[01:21:13.480 --> 01:21:20.080]  of my rules. Never make a primary, never make a proactive statement of law out of your own
[01:21:20.080 --> 01:21:35.520]  opinion. You can give the judge the most convincing arguments. You can give the judge a great
[01:21:35.520 --> 01:21:43.560]  story as to why he should rule in your favor. But if you don't bring him facts and law,
[01:21:43.560 --> 01:21:50.680]  he has no power to rule in your favor. The law, the court, the judge is not there to
[01:21:50.680 --> 01:21:59.360]  dispense justice. That's what the legislature's for. The legislature's there to pass laws,
[01:21:59.360 --> 01:22:08.960]  the adjudication of which result in just outcomes for litigants. It is the judge's duty to apply
[01:22:08.960 --> 01:22:15.960]  the law that the legislature passes and as it is brought to the judge, to the facts in
[01:22:15.960 --> 01:22:23.120]  the case. I do not want the judge coming into court and deciding what he thinks is fair.
[01:22:23.120 --> 01:22:28.320]  That's what happens in the common law. We have these guys out there advocating the common
[01:22:28.320 --> 01:22:38.520]  law. And I want to say, are you guys out of your minds? The common law puts no requirements
[01:22:38.520 --> 01:22:45.600]  on the judge's just ruling where he wants to. The common law is case law alone. I do
[01:22:45.600 --> 01:22:54.760]  not want common law. I want statutory law that I can bind that judge to. And in our
[01:22:54.760 --> 01:23:00.320]  court system, the judge is bound to the law. And I have case law that says that if a judge
[01:23:00.320 --> 01:23:10.680]  fails to properly apply the law to the facts, that's a due process violation. If a judge
[01:23:10.680 --> 01:23:15.160]  acting under the color of his authority exerts a proportion to an authority he does not have
[01:23:15.160 --> 01:23:24.600]  or fails to perform a duty he's required to perform and in the process denies uniform
[01:23:24.600 --> 01:23:31.280]  for access to a dormitory right. That's a class A misdemeanor. Primary duty the judge
[01:23:31.280 --> 01:23:41.160]  must perform is to properly apply the law to the facts if he fails to do so. I say,
[01:23:41.160 --> 01:23:46.400]  you can appeal to a court of appeals, but you can also appeal to a grand jury to indict
[01:23:46.400 --> 01:23:58.040]  him. That's what we need to start doing. Did I get off topic? No, no, it's just it's
[01:23:58.040 --> 01:24:09.640]  confusing. It's still confusing to me because I've read it was, I don't know if it was
[01:24:09.640 --> 01:24:14.000]  an old constitution of Georgia. I've been, I've got it printed somewhere. I've been
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:18.520]  trying to find it, haven't been able to put my hand on it, but it says that the sheriff
[01:24:18.520 --> 01:24:26.320]  is deemed to know the law. And if the sheriff is deemed to know the law, then I would think
[01:24:26.320 --> 01:24:34.160]  that the judge and the prosecutor would be deemed to know the law even better than the
[01:24:34.160 --> 01:24:42.680]  sheriff. Okay, that's that's a logical presumption. But it is species logic. And that is based
[01:24:42.680 --> 01:24:51.880]  on false premise. The sheriff is deemed to know the law because he goes out on the streets
[01:24:51.880 --> 01:25:01.640]  and purports to enforce the law. It is reasonable to expect a sheriff who enforces the law at
[01:25:01.640 --> 01:25:09.080]  the point of a gun. It's reasonable to presume that he knows what the law is. The judge is
[01:25:09.080 --> 01:25:18.520]  not enforcing the law. That's what the executive branch does. The judge adjudicates law. The
[01:25:18.520 --> 01:25:24.320]  judge looks at the facts the sheriff brings him and determines if the sheriff acted in
[01:25:24.320 --> 01:25:31.240]  accordance with the law. The judge looks at the facts and the law brought to him by the
[01:25:31.240 --> 01:25:38.960]  litigants. That's a problem proceeds have. They don't know. And the judge doesn't tell
[01:25:38.960 --> 01:25:44.480]  them. You can't just come in here and tell me that the guys are dirty, rotten scoundrel
[01:25:44.480 --> 01:25:52.760]  and did everything wrong. You have to say that these facts occurred. And under this
[01:25:52.760 --> 01:25:59.600]  law and this set of facts, this is how the case should be adjudicated. That's what you
[01:25:59.600 --> 01:26:05.840]  have to give the judge. And that's the way it has to be. Otherwise we'll have judges
[01:26:05.840 --> 01:26:16.720]  of their doing whatever they want to. Just like what we have right now. Judges act on
[01:26:16.720 --> 01:26:23.440]  their caprice and we're not going after them and holding them to the rule of law. If we
[01:26:23.440 --> 01:26:28.840]  bring the judges back to their primary duty, apply the law as it comes to them. They don't
[01:26:28.840 --> 01:26:35.280]  go out. They don't get to go out and look up law on their own. They must adjudicate the
[01:26:35.280 --> 01:26:41.720]  law brought before them. This is the part they don't tell you in social studies class
[01:26:41.720 --> 01:26:46.960]  which they don't even have anymore. Does that make sense?
[01:26:46.960 --> 01:26:59.880]  It does. And this is where I'm getting mixed messages from the judge. For example, I had
[01:26:59.880 --> 01:27:15.400]  a hearing for a new trial. He ruled on the hearing before he got the transcript for
[01:27:15.400 --> 01:27:22.560]  the, before the transcript was prepared. And in that ruling, he did not address any of
[01:27:22.560 --> 01:27:30.920]  the points that I brought up. But he brought in all this case law, several mentions of
[01:27:30.920 --> 01:27:44.120]  different case law to deny my motion. But the prosecution did not say one word in rebuttal
[01:27:44.120 --> 01:27:53.800]  or offer one sentence in written rebuttal to anything that I did. So it has been filed
[01:27:53.800 --> 01:28:01.480]  criminally against the judge for exerting or purporting to exerting authority. He did
[01:28:01.480 --> 01:28:10.080]  not express to have and the process of not uniform for access to your enjoyment of right.
[01:28:10.080 --> 01:28:16.480]  That's official oppression. In Texas, it's called official oppression. In most states,
[01:28:16.480 --> 01:28:23.840]  it's called official misconduct. But it's the same in either case.
[01:28:23.840 --> 01:28:29.760]  Would that be filed in a state?
[01:28:29.760 --> 01:28:35.200]  That would be filed with any magistrate. Any magistrate?
[01:28:35.200 --> 01:28:41.200]  Now when you file it with a magistrate, all judges are magistrates. If you go to a judge
[01:28:41.200 --> 01:28:46.520]  and ask the judge to act on a criminal complaint against another judge, what do you think he's
[01:28:46.520 --> 01:28:47.520]  going to do?
[01:28:47.520 --> 01:28:51.960]  He's going to put on his chicken suit.
[01:28:51.960 --> 01:28:59.680]  Exactly. And that's exactly what we want him to do. Because when he does that, then
[01:28:59.680 --> 01:29:06.240]  we go to the next judge and file against this one. And while the next judge is putting
[01:29:06.240 --> 01:29:11.480]  on his chicken suit, the first judge really gets his chicken suit on because now he's
[01:29:11.480 --> 01:29:17.040]  afraid of what's going to happen to him when that next judge gets peed for being put on
[01:29:17.040 --> 01:29:25.000]  a spot because of this judge. And you keep stepping up the ladder and just keep raising
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:31.800]  the heat on him. I live in Wise County, Texas. And I had a sure step to come to me and say,
[01:29:31.800 --> 01:29:34.520]  what did you do to the sheriff? I said, why didn't I do anything to him?
[01:29:34.520 --> 01:29:39.440]  Lately, why? He said, well, we had roll call this morning and he said, ask who knew Randy
[01:29:39.440 --> 01:29:45.240]  Kelton, about half of us raised our hand. And he said, look, you are not to stop him.
[01:29:45.240 --> 01:29:52.800]  You are not to cite him. And whatever you do, don't put that SOB in my jail.
[01:29:52.800 --> 01:29:59.800]  And being is around the routine on them. Repeatedly. And they do not.
[01:30:22.800 --> 01:30:50.000]  Is your last name Miracle, Relish or Tumblr? If so, you're one of the final folks to bear
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.840]  some of Britain's oldest surnames, dating back to the Domestay Book of 1086. The Guild
[01:30:55.840 --> 01:31:00.800]  of One Name Studies, which investigates the origin and heritage of names, says hundreds
[01:31:00.800 --> 01:31:06.240]  of British surnames are nearly extinct. Those include Roe Brea, an old English term for a
[01:31:06.240 --> 01:31:12.160]  nearby hill, and Dewgoot, likely the nickname of a well-intentioned man, also foot head
[01:31:12.160 --> 01:31:17.020]  from the property near the foot of Spurnhead in Yorkshire. But if your surname is Brett
[01:31:17.020 --> 01:31:22.360]  or a spinster, well, the Guild would be shocked. You see, old chap, those names are presumed
[01:31:22.360 --> 01:31:31.360]  extinct. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.360 --> 01:31:36.760]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.760 --> 01:31:42.200]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:42.200 --> 01:31:46.120]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[01:31:46.120 --> 01:31:50.760]  lives. And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist,
[01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:53.800]  I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correction officer, I'm an Air Force
[01:31:53.800 --> 01:31:58.760]  pilot, I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:58.760 --> 01:32:03.960]  RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did
[01:32:03.960 --> 01:32:07.800]  your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the
[01:32:07.800 --> 01:32:11.560]  government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.560 --> 01:32:15.360]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why
[01:32:15.360 --> 01:32:19.840]  you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little
[01:32:19.840 --> 01:32:24.840]  to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the
[01:32:24.840 --> 01:32:29.280]  Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:29.280 --> 01:32:37.160]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to
[01:32:37.160 --> 01:32:41.920]  hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate
[01:32:41.920 --> 01:32:46.640]  another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. So if those
[01:32:46.640 --> 01:32:55.080]  out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745
[01:32:55.080 --> 01:32:59.520]  or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean,
[01:32:59.520 --> 01:33:12.520]  I actually be kidding about chemtrails. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:29.520 --> 01:33:40.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Reelville Radio on this Friday the 13th, March 2018,
[01:33:40.040 --> 01:33:44.880]  and we're talking to Sonny and George, and I ran off the cliff again. But Sonny, you're
[01:33:44.880 --> 01:33:53.920]  asking the right questions. In all this time I've been doing these shows, I've been trying
[01:33:53.920 --> 01:34:06.440]  to work my way down to what is the ultimate remedy? What is the core of this problem and
[01:34:06.440 --> 01:34:13.920]  this issue? And it's not the police. It's not the prosecutors. It's not your lawyers.
[01:34:13.920 --> 01:34:20.840]  They're all stuck in a system they didn't create. And the judges, just like the rest
[01:34:20.840 --> 01:34:30.720]  of them are stuck in this system they didn't create. However, the fix goes to judges. If
[01:34:30.720 --> 01:34:35.760]  we're going to fix this problem, we're going to fix it with the judges. When we start landing
[01:34:35.760 --> 01:34:43.320]  on the judges like a ton of bricks, the judges will start changing their behavior. And when
[01:34:43.320 --> 01:34:50.040]  we start forcing them to change their behavior, everything else will begin to write itself.
[01:34:50.040 --> 01:34:57.440]  That's the right question, Sonny. Did I answer all your questions?
[01:34:57.440 --> 01:35:05.120]  That was really good what you said about the judges being deemed to know the law because
[01:35:05.120 --> 01:35:12.480]  for a long time I sort of had the approach of, well, if I just present all the facts
[01:35:12.480 --> 01:35:18.920]  then the judge should be able to just connect all the dots for me. And it was just a bad
[01:35:18.920 --> 01:35:26.400]  presumption on my part. In all of my time in studying and researching
[01:35:26.400 --> 01:35:37.120]  law and these issues, that is the hardest thing to discover. The unstated presuppositions
[01:35:37.120 --> 01:35:46.880]  that we hold. We just accept that if we give the judge reasonable facts, then he'll ruin
[01:35:46.880 --> 01:35:55.520]  our favor. And nobody says to us, you can't do that. And once the lights come on, then
[01:35:55.520 --> 01:36:03.400]  it becomes abundantly clear what Dr. Graves is talking about when he says your only purpose
[01:36:03.400 --> 01:36:12.040]  in the trial court is to set the record for appeal. Because when you think my only purpose
[01:36:12.040 --> 01:36:19.880]  is to set the record for appeal, the only thing you will do in the trial court is get
[01:36:19.880 --> 01:36:26.120]  the facts on the record and get the law relevant to those facts on the record. That's your
[01:36:26.120 --> 01:36:32.640]  only purpose. Forget about explaining yourself. Forget about convincing the judge that you
[01:36:32.640 --> 01:36:40.440]  have a right to a fair adjudication. I set as a judge in a mock trial once for a friend
[01:36:40.440 --> 01:36:49.160]  of mine who was being charged by the state of Pennsylvania. And they pulled a jury panel
[01:36:49.160 --> 01:36:55.720]  off the street. This is in Massachusetts. Wooster, Massachusetts. Massachusetts. I'll
[01:36:55.720 --> 01:37:00.240]  get that right in a second. Anyway, they pulled a mock jury off the street who didn't know
[01:37:00.240 --> 01:37:05.240]  this guy. They didn't know anybody here. And he came up and he's bringing all these
[01:37:05.240 --> 01:37:14.080]  patriot issues. And I'm sitting as the judge. And I'm thinking, okay, you're telling me
[01:37:14.080 --> 01:37:26.520]  all this stuff, so what? How does that go to the case before me? Give me something I
[01:37:26.520 --> 01:37:34.200]  can work with. Give me some facts and give me the law that goes to those facts so I can
[01:37:34.200 --> 01:37:41.400]  apply the law to the facts and give you a just adjudication. He had two mock trials.
[01:37:41.400 --> 01:37:49.160]  The jury found him guilty in both. He went to real trial and got four years in jail.
[01:37:49.160 --> 01:37:59.880]  He just couldn't get past all of this patriot mythology and these unstated presuppositions
[01:37:59.880 --> 01:38:06.880]  he was working from. That if I give you a good enough reason, you'll rule in my favor.
[01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:15.600]  No, no, no. We don't want judges doing that nonsense. Give me facts. Give me law. Okay.
[01:38:15.600 --> 01:38:24.880]  Go ahead, Sonny. Do you think a proper analogy to what we've just been talking about would
[01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:39.720]  be kind of like with a computer program, as far as programming, where you have the software,
[01:38:39.720 --> 01:38:47.400]  the programming there and then by inputting the fact, if you supply the fact and you supply
[01:38:47.400 --> 01:38:55.800]  the basic program and the software, then you should get the right output. Would that be
[01:38:55.800 --> 01:39:02.520]  a perfect analogy? That is a perfect analogy and that is precisely the tool I'm in the
[01:39:02.520 --> 01:39:14.000]  process of building. I take the law, take the elements in a code and I have 10 years
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:22.200]  building these questionnaires and not one of them goes to merits. I haven't got to merits
[01:39:22.200 --> 01:39:31.200]  yet. I say, this is the code. These are the elements of the code. I ask, is this element
[01:39:31.200 --> 01:39:38.040]  present? Yes, no. Is this element present? Is this element present? If they say yes,
[01:39:38.040 --> 01:39:43.560]  then I go to the next element. If they say no on any one of them, I go to, okay, this
[01:39:43.560 --> 01:39:52.160]  case law says, or this statute says, if this element is not present, then the absence of
[01:39:52.160 --> 01:39:58.280]  this present, this element is an affirmative defense. I write a motion, go into the affirmative
[01:39:58.280 --> 01:40:08.880]  defense and I show the facts and how they relate to the law. It's really straightforward.
[01:40:08.880 --> 01:40:17.720]  Once we get this tool completely built, there won't be any wiggle room for the judge. It
[01:40:17.720 --> 01:40:21.520]  will automatically put the law and the facts in front of him. It doesn't matter what the
[01:40:21.520 --> 01:40:32.560]  law, judge thinks is fair or just. That's irrelevant. If law and facts lead to unjust
[01:40:32.560 --> 01:40:40.800]  outcomes, that's the legislature's place to fix, not the judge. When we start asking
[01:40:40.800 --> 01:40:49.120]  judges to fix the weakness in legislature, we start down a really slippery slope. While
[01:40:49.120 --> 01:40:57.800]  I don't do politics, primarily what my difference between Democrats and Republicans is Democrats
[01:40:57.800 --> 01:41:06.440]  tend to say, do what right? Give us justice. If the law doesn't give us justice, we want
[01:41:06.440 --> 01:41:15.520]  you to give us justice anyway. Then the Republicans say, bad, bad idea. Follow law. If the law
[01:41:15.520 --> 01:41:22.960]  doesn't give us justice, change the law. That's a gross generalization, but that's the perception
[01:41:22.960 --> 01:41:31.680]  I go by. It always makes me cringe. The Trump is getting all of this flack about wanting
[01:41:31.680 --> 01:41:42.520]  to enforce the immigration laws. I'm thinking, I'm saying, what is your problem, folks? This
[01:41:42.520 --> 01:41:53.880]  is the law. Follow it. And they're saying, well, it's unfair, okay? Change it. But until
[01:41:53.880 --> 01:42:04.000]  you change it, insist that our judges follow it. Otherwise, you go down a slippery slope
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:12.440]  that leads precisely to the mess we're experiencing right now. How do you feel about that, silly?
[01:42:12.440 --> 01:42:29.320]  Yeah. Yeah, I think that's a pretty good assessment. I do have another question on a motion. If
[01:42:29.320 --> 01:42:45.080]  it's unopposed, shouldn't I be granted the motion? Not necessarily. If a motion is unopposed,
[01:42:45.080 --> 01:42:53.840]  the court must construe all statements you make in the motion as true. And then look
[01:42:53.840 --> 01:43:04.840]  at the motion and say, if all of these facts are true, does that give the movement a right
[01:43:04.840 --> 01:43:12.960]  to this outcome? If the motion is insufficient on its face, even if the other side doesn't
[01:43:12.960 --> 01:43:19.640]  oppose it, the judge has no power to grant it. So you have to be real careful when you
[01:43:19.640 --> 01:43:28.080]  construct the motion. And make sure that if you accept all of these facts as true and
[01:43:28.080 --> 01:43:36.880]  apply this law, these laws to those facts, it leads to this outcome. If it doesn't, and
[01:43:36.880 --> 01:43:41.800]  you get a lot of motions that don't, then the judge has no power to grant it. Does that
[01:43:41.800 --> 01:43:48.880]  make sense? It does. And should you... Wait, wait, hang on. About to go to break. Randy
[01:43:48.880 --> 01:43:53.320]  Kelton with our radio. I'm not going to give out the calling number. We'll go into our
[01:43:53.320 --> 01:44:23.160]  last segment. Ted, we'll get to you. We'll be right back.
[01:44:23.160 --> 01:44:28.020]  And now you know hemp is not marijuana. And marijuana is not hemp. They are different
[01:44:28.020 --> 01:44:33.360]  varieties of the same species. Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts.
[01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:37.800]  And to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you
[01:44:37.800 --> 01:44:44.240]  need to know about. Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein. It's gluten-free,
[01:44:44.240 --> 01:44:53.920]  anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367
[01:44:53.920 --> 01:44:59.880]  and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you. Only at hempusa.org.
[01:44:59.880 --> 01:45:09.560]  It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Defense
[01:45:09.560 --> 01:45:16.120]  Distributed in Fat Sal's Deli. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation
[01:45:16.120 --> 01:45:21.000]  is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, first place, up for grabs, a spikes
[01:45:21.000 --> 01:45:28.600]  tactical AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm pistol. From Defense Distributed, third
[01:45:28.600 --> 01:45:35.600]  place, the AR-308, 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15, 80% lower. From Fat Sal's Deli,
[01:45:35.600 --> 01:45:41.360]  fifth place, $100 gift card for Fat Sal's Deli. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:45:41.360 --> 01:45:47.160]  That's LogosRadioNetwork.com. Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal101,
[01:45:47.160 --> 01:45:51.680]  you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar, get 10 chances to
[01:45:51.680 --> 01:45:57.680]  win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:45:57.680 --> 01:46:24.160]  for details and donate today.
[01:46:24.160 --> 01:46:30.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Legal101 Radio. And we're talking to Sonny and Georgia.
[01:46:30.040 --> 01:46:38.080]  Okay, you had another question, Sonny? Yes, Randy. What would be some of the dangers
[01:46:38.080 --> 01:46:53.080]  or drawbacks of not writing an order and including that with your motion? Okay. Generally, you
[01:46:53.080 --> 01:47:01.040]  might get an order you didn't want. I don't know that there's really a drawback. If the
[01:47:01.040 --> 01:47:10.480]  judge wants an order, he will ask for one. If you want a specific order, you write it
[01:47:10.480 --> 01:47:15.360]  because you want that order. If the judge decides to rule in your favor and there is
[01:47:15.360 --> 01:47:22.360]  no order, the judge will generally tell you how he intends to rule and ask you to write
[01:47:22.360 --> 01:47:32.000]  the order for it. So, I don't know that there's a specific drawback. What I generally do is
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:39.360]  I create the order. I mean, I create my pleading and my prayer and then I take the prayer and
[01:47:39.360 --> 01:47:46.560]  I convert it into an order and say, I requested this, granted or denied. I request this. The
[01:47:46.560 --> 01:47:51.400]  court orders this, granted, denied. I put a section in there where the judge can check
[01:47:51.400 --> 01:47:57.760]  off, granted or denied. And that lets the judge go down and pick and then I give a section
[01:47:57.760 --> 01:48:07.480]  at the bottom where he can write in whatever he wants to. It's just polite. This is for
[01:48:07.480 --> 01:48:11.640]  the most part, we're in civil litigation and we're civil with one another. The judge is
[01:48:11.640 --> 01:48:16.480]  really busy. He don't have time to create documents. If you want one, he expects you
[01:48:16.480 --> 01:48:25.000]  to create a form. But I don't know that it creates any kind of adjudicative liability.
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Okay. That's good. What about if a judge in the early stages of the proceedings, if he
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:52.160]  were to threaten you with more jail time than is legally possible? For example, if he said,
[01:48:52.160 --> 01:48:59.840]  well, I could give you three years when legally, that story that he could only give you two.
[01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:00.840]  Does that...
[01:49:00.840 --> 01:49:14.280]  File officialments conduct charges against him immediately. You have a right to procedural
[01:49:14.280 --> 01:49:21.160]  due process and that means the proper adjudication of the law for a judge to make a threat against
[01:49:21.160 --> 01:49:29.040]  you, of giving you a punishment that's beyond his authority. He exerts or purports to exert
[01:49:29.040 --> 01:49:34.480]  an authority he does not expressly have and denies you in full and free access to or enjoins
[01:49:34.480 --> 01:49:40.320]  him right, the right being the just adjudication of the law. And that's the class A misdemeanor
[01:49:40.320 --> 01:49:49.400]  in most every state, filed against him immediately. I am prone to ask the bailiff to arrest him
[01:49:49.400 --> 01:49:57.800]  in the courtroom, but I have a little different motivation. I'm addicted to a trial and I
[01:49:57.800 --> 01:50:01.800]  love to give him a trial and where I think he's sweet. So I don't suggest everybody
[01:50:01.800 --> 01:50:12.840]  else do it. It reminds me of the time when I stood on a jeep spotting incoming and essentially
[01:50:12.840 --> 01:50:21.920]  dared them to shoot me off that jeep. They accommodated me. I can take on the judge and
[01:50:21.920 --> 01:50:26.480]  I don't have to worry about being shot. At least not as much, but yeah, file criminal
[01:50:26.480 --> 01:50:30.480]  charges against him immediately.
[01:50:30.480 --> 01:50:38.280]  Yeah. And when the magistrate don't want to take it, wonderful. See how that works for
[01:50:38.280 --> 01:50:42.560]  you. Bubba and you start working up the chain. Why are you still going into court with this
[01:50:42.560 --> 01:50:49.640]  judge? Criminal complaint, judicial conduct complaint. If it's a municipal court, bar
[01:50:49.640 --> 01:50:57.040]  grievance because if it's a court of record, he has to be a judge. If you care, I'm sorry,
[01:50:57.040 --> 01:51:02.680]  if it's a court of record, he has to be an attorney. If he's an attorney and he has a
[01:51:02.680 --> 01:51:07.280]  bar card, judicial conduct, a bar grievance against him, just be him with everything you
[01:51:07.280 --> 01:51:18.120]  got. The judge does not have to be your buddy. You do that on the grade school parking lot
[01:51:18.120 --> 01:51:22.920]  and the biggest bully out there wants to push you around. You sneak up behind him with a
[01:51:22.920 --> 01:51:30.000]  baseball bat and cold cock him. Next time he sees you, he may be mad at you, but he is
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:37.440]  not going to want to mess with you. That's what we want to do to the judges. If we're
[01:51:37.440 --> 01:51:42.880]  going to get control back, we have to take them on. Sonny, I got one more caller and
[01:51:42.880 --> 01:51:46.520]  only seven minutes left. Do you have anything else?
[01:51:46.520 --> 01:51:51.320]  That's it, Randy. Thank you. Thank you and have a good night.
[01:51:51.320 --> 01:51:55.840]  Okay, thank you, Sonny. Okay, now we're going to Ted in Utah. Hello, Ted.
[01:51:55.840 --> 01:51:59.240]  Hi, Randy. How are you doing tonight?
[01:51:59.240 --> 01:52:02.760]  I'm doing good. What do you have for us today?
[01:52:02.760 --> 01:52:06.760]  I'm just wondering about my e-book.
[01:52:06.760 --> 01:52:11.040]  Oh, you're the one with the... You didn't get that yet.
[01:52:11.040 --> 01:52:12.560]  No, sir.
[01:52:12.560 --> 01:52:20.920]  Okay, send me another email and I will send you my copies of it. I afforded that to Deb,
[01:52:20.920 --> 01:52:26.880]  but she's been really stressed out lately. She may have missed it. I will afford you
[01:52:26.880 --> 01:52:33.800]  two copies. I'll forward you the PDF copy, and I'll also forward you the mind map copy.
[01:52:33.800 --> 01:52:34.800]  Okay.
[01:52:34.800 --> 01:52:35.800]  I like...
[01:52:35.800 --> 01:52:38.720]  Y'all, I want to study up on things.
[01:52:38.720 --> 01:52:40.720]  I like the mind map copy better.
[01:52:40.720 --> 01:52:43.280]  I hear you now I can start stinging people.
[01:52:43.280 --> 01:52:45.280]  Pardon me?
[01:52:45.280 --> 01:52:49.880]  I want to study up on things and figure out how I can start stinging them.
[01:52:49.880 --> 01:52:59.360]  Oh, this is... The problem it has is it's addictive. It is so much fun.
[01:52:59.360 --> 01:53:05.480]  You just haven't lived until you tried to get a public official to do something and
[01:53:05.480 --> 01:53:11.400]  they wouldn't do it, so you call 911 and then they come out and try to do what you ask
[01:53:11.400 --> 01:53:20.560]  them to do, and you tell them, sorry, Bubba, that bell's already been wrong. The district
[01:53:20.560 --> 01:53:30.240]  clerk in Randall County, the look on her face was absolutely priceless, and it is great
[01:53:30.240 --> 01:53:37.680]  fun and this will help you do that. It's quite involved. There's a lot in there. It's not
[01:53:37.680 --> 01:53:43.600]  as well-organized as I would like, but I didn't have time to do all of it. It's 10 years
[01:53:43.600 --> 01:53:49.920]  of research, actually more than that. There are sections in there that go to 30 years
[01:53:49.920 --> 01:53:53.720]  of research. The section that...
[01:53:53.720 --> 01:53:58.120]  You guys have been extremely busy.
[01:53:58.120 --> 01:54:05.240]  I have been extremely busy, and so I haven't had time to go back and redo it the way I
[01:54:05.240 --> 01:54:13.240]  would like to. There are sections in there, the section on how to write legal documents.
[01:54:13.240 --> 01:54:21.760]  There's a section in there on mental flow. That section's based on over 30 years of research.
[01:54:21.760 --> 01:54:29.520]  That is based on a new psychology that I wrote. I studied the popular psychology after I got
[01:54:29.520 --> 01:54:34.800]  back in Vietnam. I was nuts, and I did something one time that made me realize I was really
[01:54:34.800 --> 01:54:39.720]  crazy, and I went to work on it and tried to figure out what the problem was. I read
[01:54:39.720 --> 01:54:46.360]  all the popular psychologists, and I felt like I was reading theologies. These were
[01:54:46.360 --> 01:54:55.400]  not science. These were just somebody's ideas, and it was frustrating. I'm an engineer, and
[01:54:55.400 --> 01:55:00.480]  I connect dots. I don't do philosophy.
[01:55:00.480 --> 01:55:07.720]  I sat down and imagined that I was an alien zoologist sent to a backwater edge of the
[01:55:07.720 --> 01:55:21.160]  galaxy to a minor planet around a mediocre star to examine a bipedal mammal, Homo sapiensapiens.
[01:55:21.160 --> 01:55:29.720]  What can I tell about that mammal? Just from observation. I can't touch him. I can't interview
[01:55:29.720 --> 01:55:38.160]  with him. I can't dissect him. I can only watch. What can I determine just from watching?
[01:55:38.160 --> 01:55:48.000]  I put together a structured model of the living mind. That model predicted a number of things.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:53.600]  One of the things it predicted was the rubber ball theory. The rubber ball theory is not
[01:55:53.600 --> 01:56:01.920]  included in the mind map, in the legal 101, because it really doesn't go to law directly,
[01:56:01.920 --> 01:56:08.480]  but it goes to how human beings do what they do. If anybody's interested in the rubber
[01:56:08.480 --> 01:56:16.960]  ball theory, I will send an email and ask for it, and I'll send it to them. It demonstrates
[01:56:16.960 --> 01:56:27.040]  a tool, a very specific procedure, and using that procedure, I can change you. You can
[01:56:27.040 --> 01:56:31.200]  know that I'm doing it, know when I'm doing it and how I'm doing it, and you can't do
[01:56:31.200 --> 01:56:39.040]  anything about it. As a matter of fact, using the same procedure, you can change me. I can
[01:56:39.040 --> 01:56:42.440]  know you're doing it, know when and how you're doing it, and I can't do anything about it.
[01:56:42.440 --> 01:56:47.640]  As a matter of fact, if I know you're doing it, it works better. If anybody's interested
[01:56:47.640 --> 01:56:53.280]  in that, I'll send it to them. It's only about 15 pages, but if I've done my job right,
[01:56:53.280 --> 01:56:59.160]  it will change your life, and it will give you a foundation to better understand the
[01:56:59.160 --> 01:57:07.760]  section on mental flow in the e-book, because the section on mental flow was developed from
[01:57:07.760 --> 01:57:17.720]  that map of the living mind. In that section, the whole purpose of it is to pay attention
[01:57:17.720 --> 01:57:26.600]  to how you're moving the mind of your reader. I do this radio show, and I'm sitting here
[01:57:26.600 --> 01:57:32.200]  speaking to a microphone. I can't see how you're responding to me, so I have to carefully
[01:57:32.200 --> 01:57:40.240]  craft my language so that when I make these noises with my face, and someone else hears
[01:57:40.240 --> 01:57:49.280]  these noises I make with my face, that the understanding and realizations I'm trying
[01:57:49.280 --> 01:57:59.160]  to present are what formulates in the mind of my listener. That's tough, but the e-book
[01:57:59.160 --> 01:58:05.200]  in this section has all of the tools I've developed over the years for that purpose.
[01:58:05.200 --> 01:58:12.040]  I think you'll find that extremely interesting, and if you'll send me an email, I will send
[01:58:12.040 --> 01:58:20.000]  that to you directly. I've got both of them in my... I prefer Deb to send them so that
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:25.160]  she has it all in her records, but I will make sure I get that to you, and I do apologize
[01:58:25.160 --> 01:58:35.120]  for the delay. This is Randy Kelton, Rue La Radio, on this Friday, the 13th day of April
[01:58:35.120 --> 01:58:44.320]  2018. We will be back next week on our regular Thursday night show, and Friday, both starting
[01:58:44.320 --> 01:58:50.640]  at 8 p.m. Central. Thank you all for listening, and good night.
[01:58:50.640 --> 01:58:56.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New
[01:58:56.000 --> 01:59:01.480]  Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:01.480 --> 01:59:07.080]  that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know
[01:59:07.080 --> 01:59:12.840]  the meaning of life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll-free
[01:59:12.840 --> 01:59:22.960]  at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate, and
[01:59:22.960 --> 01:59:29.120]  it comes with over 13,000 cross-references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every
[01:59:29.120 --> 01:59:34.240]  book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the
[01:59:34.240 --> 01:59:45.760]  New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102, or visit
[01:59:45.760 --> 02:00:06.360]  us online at bfa.org.