[00:00.000 --> 00:08.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:08.760 --> 00:17.080]  Markets for Wednesday, 7 March 2018 are trading with gold at $1,327.21 an ounce, silver $16.49
[00:17.080 --> 00:28.240]  an ounce, Texas crude $62.60 a barrel, bitcoins at $9,883.87, Ethereum $748.18, Bitcoin Cash
[00:28.240 --> 00:35.240]  $1,086.63 and fighting Litecoins at $181.10 a crypto coin.
[00:35.240 --> 00:46.080]  Today in History, the year 1989, I ran in the United Kingdom break diplomatic relations after
[00:46.080 --> 00:55.200]  a fight over Simon Rushdie's controversial novel, The Titanic vs. Today in History.
[00:55.200 --> 01:00.400]  One recent news, President Trump's top economic advisor, Gary D. Cohn, stated yesterday Tuesday
[01:00.400 --> 01:04.920]  that he was indeed resigning this after giving a heads up last week that he was considering
[01:04.920 --> 01:10.120]  doing so if President Trump decided to follow through with his tariffs on imported aluminum
[01:10.120 --> 01:11.120]  and steel.
[01:11.120 --> 01:14.720]  Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed levy tariffs
[01:14.720 --> 01:19.560]  on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure seems obvious for
[01:19.560 --> 01:23.800]  many, considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents of any such measures in the
[01:23.800 --> 01:27.960]  administration.
[01:27.960 --> 01:32.800]  According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jantz out of the University
[01:32.800 --> 01:37.360]  of Tennessee believes he may have found the skeletal remains of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific
[01:37.360 --> 01:38.360]  island.
[01:38.360 --> 01:43.160]  Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator Fred Newton were never to be
[01:43.160 --> 01:44.160]  found.
[01:44.160 --> 01:48.880]  At least until now, Richard Jantz stated that what I can say scientifically is that they,
[01:48.880 --> 01:53.280]  the recent Pacific island remains, are 99% likely to be hers.
[01:53.280 --> 01:56.720]  There has been timing for this finding to be released, considering that the 1932 Hudson
[01:56.720 --> 02:01.760]  Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, was reportedly stolen on Friday, February
[02:01.760 --> 02:08.160]  23, 2018, only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood
[02:08.160 --> 02:13.720]  in LA.
[02:13.720 --> 02:18.280]  The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, with the top 10 currencies suffering 5-10%
[02:18.280 --> 02:19.280]  losses.
[02:19.280 --> 02:22.120]  This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would
[02:22.120 --> 02:26.160]  be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them.
[02:26.160 --> 02:30.360]  According to the Sec statement, quote, if a platform offers trading of digital assets
[02:30.360 --> 02:35.240]  that are securities and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws,
[02:35.240 --> 02:40.120]  then the platform must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or be
[02:40.120 --> 02:42.120]  exempt from registration.
[02:42.120 --> 02:45.120]  The Low Start Lowdown is looking for sponsors.
[02:45.120 --> 02:48.680]  You have a product or a service you like to advertise with us, feel free to give me
[02:48.680 --> 02:53.680]  a call at 210-363-2257.
[02:53.680 --> 03:22.680]  This was Brick Rody with your Lowdown for March 7, 2018.
[03:22.680 --> 03:48.320]  Alright folks, good evening, this is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig.
[03:48.320 --> 03:55.320]  It is April 2, 2018, yes, we are live tonight, not Memorex.
[03:55.320 --> 04:00.320]  The thing about it is, let's see, let me get this to work completely now, alright, there
[04:00.320 --> 04:01.320]  we go.
[04:01.320 --> 04:07.000]  Alright, now I do apologize for last week's archive.
[04:07.000 --> 04:10.360]  We were planning on doing a live show but we had a problem with the caller server where
[04:10.360 --> 04:14.680]  we wouldn't be able to talk to any of you folks if you tried to call in.
[04:14.680 --> 04:18.000]  You couldn't hear us, we couldn't hear you and it wouldn't have done anybody any good
[04:18.000 --> 04:21.920]  because we couldn't log in to tell you we were there anyway, so.
[04:21.920 --> 04:27.360]  In lieu of that situation, we went ahead and ran an archive last week so my apologies
[04:27.360 --> 04:28.840]  for having to do that.
[04:28.840 --> 04:31.840]  But tonight, we don't have that issue.
[04:31.840 --> 04:36.440]  Now real quick, just an update in this segment and I'm going to just take this segment to
[04:36.440 --> 04:42.200]  talk about this and then we'll start taking calls after the break and I will turn the
[04:42.200 --> 04:48.960]  phones on here and allow you to start getting in line so that you can be ready for the next
[04:48.960 --> 04:49.960]  segment.
[04:49.960 --> 04:55.560]  Now please, if you're going to call in, have questions, not commentary and running dialogue
[04:55.560 --> 05:00.960]  or stories unless your story is one of how you've been successful with the information
[05:00.960 --> 05:05.280]  you've learned here, okay, or successful in a case period because of something you've
[05:05.280 --> 05:09.560]  learned here or put to good use and you want to share it, that's fine.
[05:09.560 --> 05:13.960]  But let's not get into historical reenactments of crap.
[05:13.960 --> 05:21.600]  Now that being said, I have spent the last several weeks diligently trying to rewrite
[05:21.600 --> 05:25.760]  everything in the seminar material.
[05:25.760 --> 05:30.680]  The writing is going slowly because the research is going lengthy.
[05:30.680 --> 05:39.840]  I am trying to augment more reference material into what I'm doing this time than I had time
[05:39.840 --> 05:41.920]  to do the first time.
[05:41.920 --> 05:53.640]  I'm also trying to sit down and in much clearer and shorter language write out the information
[05:53.640 --> 05:55.920]  for everyone in the new books.
[05:55.920 --> 06:01.800]  So I am trying to do an awful lot on multiple fronts here.
[06:01.800 --> 06:06.960]  I am researching, I am writing books and I am writing legal pleadings and I'm doing a
[06:06.960 --> 06:11.640]  different kind of research while I'm also trying to teach myself a few other things
[06:11.640 --> 06:18.640]  so I can make some actual training videos to put up online that will contain short snippets
[06:18.640 --> 06:24.720]  of this information and research so that we can start getting more people involved in
[06:24.720 --> 06:28.200]  learning what's truly going on.
[06:28.200 --> 06:33.040]  So it's an awful lot of work and it takes up an awful lot of time.
[06:33.040 --> 06:36.800]  It gets me frustrated to the point where I'm sitting over here cursing like a fleet full
[06:36.800 --> 06:43.240]  of sailors, not just one guy, but a whole bunch of guys because every time I find or
[06:43.240 --> 06:52.760]  do something, then I'll read some court opinion where a judge or panel of judges is intentionally
[06:52.760 --> 07:02.200]  misdirecting the facts of the case to get an outcome that they want and I have found
[07:02.200 --> 07:08.480]  that to be true far more often than I find comforting.
[07:08.480 --> 07:14.960]  Most of the time the facts that were presented in the court record do not line up with the
[07:14.960 --> 07:21.240]  declaration made by either the trial court or the appellate court.
[07:21.240 --> 07:27.960]  They simply glossed over the facts to reach the conclusions they wanted and they spun
[07:27.960 --> 07:34.960]  the facts or denied the existence of facts that were clearly there to reach the conclusion
[07:34.960 --> 07:37.160]  that they wanted.
[07:37.160 --> 07:40.720]  Now this isn't true in just these kinds of cases.
[07:40.720 --> 07:46.520]  This has been true in many kinds of cases.
[07:46.520 --> 07:52.800]  If they are one thing, they are consistent when it comes to insisting on perpetrating
[07:52.800 --> 07:57.200]  fraud and lying to the public.
[07:57.200 --> 08:05.880]  When they have carved out the toehold they want to stand on in some section of law, it
[08:05.880 --> 08:10.560]  will literally take a stick of legal dynamite to break them loose from that toehold.
[08:10.560 --> 08:17.120]  They will not give it up no matter how many times you prove they are wrong and they have
[08:17.120 --> 08:25.680]  proven that time and time again by continuing to reach the same erroneous conclusions in
[08:25.680 --> 08:29.600]  following cases that they did in that case.
[08:29.600 --> 08:37.440]  They simply refuse to recognize the existence and meaning of the law when it goes against
[08:37.440 --> 08:40.520]  how they want it to work.
[08:40.520 --> 08:45.480]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we are working to educate you on.
[08:45.480 --> 08:47.240]  Here is what the law is.
[08:47.240 --> 08:49.160]  Here is what they're doing.
[08:49.160 --> 08:53.440]  They do not match.
[08:53.440 --> 09:00.080]  The only way we're going to stop that is to prevent them from getting convictions by
[09:00.080 --> 09:09.520]  being party on a jury and taking part in that jury to educate our fellow jurors that something
[09:09.520 --> 09:15.640]  stinks and it ain't the lunch.
[09:15.640 --> 09:22.760]  So the only way we're going to do that is education, which is why we're here.
[09:22.760 --> 09:28.720]  Now a lot of this research that I'm doing goes back through case law and case law and case
[09:28.720 --> 09:34.800]  law and Corpus Jurisicundum and any other legal encyclopedia and legal dictionary you
[09:34.800 --> 09:40.080]  can come up with and formulation of reasoning that should make sense on its face to the
[09:40.080 --> 09:46.960]  most basic intelligence we have and yet to someone educated in law, you couldn't get
[09:46.960 --> 09:52.400]  them to understand it by drilling a hole in their head and pouring it in because they
[09:52.400 --> 09:54.560]  don't want to understand it.
[09:54.560 --> 10:00.400]  It does not fit with their preconceived thought paradigm.
[10:00.400 --> 10:06.100]  That's not how they want it to be.
[10:06.100 --> 10:11.600]  The biggest obstacle you're going to run into in getting this information into the minds
[10:11.600 --> 10:18.200]  of others is the refusal or the rejection by that mind of that information because it
[10:18.200 --> 10:20.680]  doesn't have it.
[10:20.680 --> 10:24.840]  It's a square peg going into the round hole that's in their brain.
[10:24.840 --> 10:30.920]  Something they've been taught says this round hole is what there is and only a round peg
[10:30.920 --> 10:38.520]  will fit in it and the information you're trying to give them is a square peg in relation
[10:38.520 --> 10:44.320]  to that because it doesn't fit that round hole.
[10:44.320 --> 10:46.760]  So we've got our work cut out for us.
[10:46.760 --> 10:51.920]  I know I've got mine cut out for me just trying to get this stuff down on paper.
[10:51.920 --> 10:59.160]  I can tell you how many files, I just can't tell you how many pages, the notes, just the
[10:59.160 --> 11:08.440]  notes on all of this encompass that is going to be incorporated into the books and the
[11:08.440 --> 11:10.000]  new sets of pleadings.
[11:10.000 --> 11:13.160]  Let me see if I can tell you here.
[11:13.160 --> 11:24.240]  Right now there are 146 files of notes on my computer and each of those files can be
[11:24.240 --> 11:35.080]  anywhere from a single page up to 70, 80, 90 pages and there's 146 of them and that
[11:35.080 --> 11:39.840]  doesn't include the case law or anything at all like that.
[11:39.840 --> 11:42.120]  This is just my notes.
[11:42.120 --> 11:48.440]  Things I have written to remind myself about thoughts, about process, about references,
[11:48.440 --> 11:53.320]  about a particular court case that I want to be using in a certain situation and so
[11:53.320 --> 11:55.800]  on and so on.
[11:55.800 --> 11:59.040]  So I'm telling you it's a lot of stuff.
[11:59.040 --> 12:03.400]  This does not come easy to me any more than it comes easy to you.
[12:03.400 --> 12:08.280]  I have had to train myself on how to organize it and how to keep track of it and how to
[12:08.280 --> 12:13.320]  develop the arguments to use it in.
[12:13.320 --> 12:20.240]  Like most of the things that I've had to learn in my life, this is self-taught for me.
[12:20.240 --> 12:26.120]  The only thing I can say I'm proud of about that is you can't ever say that I can't do
[12:26.120 --> 12:27.120]  something.
[12:27.120 --> 12:32.000]  I may not can do it right now but you can't say that I will never be able to do it because
[12:32.000 --> 12:35.160]  I can't do it right now.
[12:35.160 --> 12:41.360]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is my biggest issue when it comes to people that ask the
[12:41.360 --> 12:48.760]  same questions over and over again because to me those people are not paying attention
[12:48.760 --> 12:54.200]  to what they're learning either through what they do or through what they call in and ask
[12:54.200 --> 12:57.240]  me or they hear me say.
[12:57.240 --> 13:05.000]  And it's not like I don't give you all the information necessary on where to find it but
[13:05.000 --> 13:12.440]  if you can't keep it organized and accessible where you can use it, then how do you plan
[13:12.440 --> 13:18.320]  on fighting the fight you're wanting to take on?
[13:18.320 --> 13:22.280]  You know, it's like getting in the boxing ring, you're fully decked out and ready to
[13:22.280 --> 13:26.560]  go but you don't know what a set of boxing gloves is used for.
[13:26.560 --> 13:31.280]  You don't know when to duck, you don't know when to blot.
[13:31.280 --> 13:36.040]  I find myself sitting in your corner with a towel over my head going where the hell
[13:36.040 --> 13:39.960]  did I go wrong this time in the training.
[13:39.960 --> 13:45.240]  That's why I say we are a source of information.
[13:45.240 --> 13:53.760]  We're not your teachers, we're not your trainers, you have to take on that role for yourself.
[13:53.760 --> 14:01.920]  You can do it in whatever way suits you and works for you as long as it works.
[14:01.920 --> 14:07.280]  You can use it, it keeps you organized to the point where you're ready to do what you
[14:07.280 --> 14:11.480]  need to do at a moment's notice without thought.
[14:11.480 --> 14:17.840]  When you can do that, you're prepared because you can't be caught off guard if you're always
[14:17.840 --> 14:20.640]  prepared.
[14:20.640 --> 14:26.320]  And when you can cite any statute that they're going to be arguing over virtually from memory
[14:26.320 --> 14:34.240]  at the snap of some of their fingers, they can't beat you.
[14:34.240 --> 14:41.160]  Not on facts, not on law unless you're saying or doing something that is not factual and
[14:41.160 --> 14:44.920]  is not in the law.
[14:44.920 --> 14:51.840]  In which case, then you're not prepared, see how that works?
[14:51.840 --> 14:57.440]  People tend to put themselves into a false sense of security because they're relying
[14:57.440 --> 15:04.080]  on the information we gave them, but they're not researching it to the depth and internalizing
[15:04.080 --> 15:11.080]  it to the degree that they can do it at the drop of a hat like most of us can that do
[15:11.080 --> 15:17.760]  this every day just by asking ourselves questions and trying to go through the various scenarios
[15:17.760 --> 15:22.640]  that we've encountered or we've been told about other people encountering to see how
[15:22.640 --> 15:28.080]  it could have been handled in such a way as to negate the outcome that existed at the
[15:28.080 --> 15:31.240]  time.
[15:31.240 --> 15:34.360]  It's like any other thing you want to get good at.
[15:34.360 --> 15:37.760]  It requires dedicated practice.
[15:37.760 --> 15:42.320]  It requires dedicated study.
[15:42.320 --> 15:47.840]  There is a form and function to all of this and that is the biggest hurdle I've got in
[15:47.840 --> 15:53.240]  trying to give the information to others and it will be the biggest one that you have.
[15:53.240 --> 15:59.200]  The one thing you need to keep in mind is that the more you know before you start that
[15:59.200 --> 16:05.400]  process, the more likely you are to be able to convince them with less effort.
[16:05.400 --> 16:11.540]  Why? Because when they start firing questions about this, that or the other back at you,
[16:11.540 --> 16:16.120]  the one thing they don't want to hear from you and still believe that you know what you're
[16:16.120 --> 16:23.280]  talking about is, uh, I don't know.
[16:23.280 --> 16:28.360]  That right there will put a bullet right through the forehead of any concept you're trying
[16:28.360 --> 16:40.040]  to convey to them because you threw out a bone and it just turned out to be inedible
[16:40.040 --> 16:42.920]  because you couldn't eat anything on it.
[16:42.920 --> 16:46.840]  You couldn't, you couldn't flesh it out for them if they asked you.
[16:46.840 --> 16:48.080]  That's a problem.
[16:48.080 --> 16:49.560]  Don't fall for that.
[16:49.560 --> 16:54.520]  Learn it first, internalize it, get good at it, then start spreading it.
[16:54.520 --> 17:00.520]  It'll be right back after the break, so y'all hang on.
[17:00.520 --> 17:01.520]  Thanks, Cookie.
[17:01.520 --> 17:02.520]  Cookie?
[17:02.520 --> 17:03.520]  Me love cookies.
[17:03.520 --> 17:04.520]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:04.520 --> 17:06.520]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:06.520 --> 17:07.520]  Cookie?
[17:07.520 --> 17:08.520]  Yucky?
[17:08.520 --> 17:09.520]  No.
[17:09.520 --> 17:10.520]  No bad cookies.
[17:10.520 --> 17:11.520]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:11.520 --> 17:12.520]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:12.520 --> 17:13.520]  No cookies?
[17:13.520 --> 17:14.520]  No.
[17:14.520 --> 17:17.120]  They are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:17.120 --> 17:18.120]  Me have apples.
[17:18.120 --> 17:19.120]  Really?
[17:19.120 --> 17:21.120]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:21.120 --> 17:23.120]  Yummy apple.
[17:23.120 --> 17:27.120]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.120 --> 17:33.120]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.120 --> 17:35.120]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[17:35.120 --> 17:40.240]  Now, I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right
[17:40.240 --> 17:45.920]  hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you
[17:45.920 --> 17:47.120]  some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.120 --> 17:48.120]  No cookies?
[17:48.120 --> 17:49.120]  Or me?
[17:49.120 --> 17:54.120]  Consider it an early Christmas present, and every time I order on Amazon, I go through
[17:54.120 --> 17:57.120]  this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.120 --> 17:58.120]  These are cookies.
[17:58.120 --> 18:00.120]  These are classified.
[18:00.120 --> 18:06.120]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.120 --> 18:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[18:09.120 --> 18:14.120]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:14.120 --> 18:15.120]  can win two.
[18:15.120 --> 18:20.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:20.120 --> 18:25.120]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.120 --> 18:30.120]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:30.120 --> 18:34.120]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.120 --> 18:39.120]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.120 --> 18:41.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.120 --> 18:47.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner
[18:47.120 --> 18:50.120]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.120 --> 18:59.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.120 --> 19:27.120]  now.
[19:29.120 --> 19:36.120]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to get debt collectors out of your
[19:36.120 --> 19:39.120]  credit reports and phone calls.
[19:39.120 --> 19:45.120]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to get debt collectors out of your
[19:45.120 --> 19:47.120]  credit reports and phone calls.
[19:47.120 --> 19:57.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com or email
[19:57.120 --> 20:08.120]  m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s.
[20:08.120 --> 20:10.120]  Alright folks, we are back.
[20:10.120 --> 20:17.120]  This is ruleoflawradio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[20:17.120 --> 20:19.120]  We are live tonight.
[20:19.120 --> 20:23.120]  That being said, we appear to have a first time caller up on the board.
[20:23.120 --> 20:26.120]  This is Dulcey in Montana.
[20:26.120 --> 20:28.120]  Dulcey, what can we do for you?
[20:28.120 --> 20:30.120]  Hi, beautiful intro.
[20:30.120 --> 20:32.120]  Intro, I hope you're doing well.
[20:32.120 --> 20:33.120]  Well, thank you.
[20:33.120 --> 20:42.120]  And I am here for a resource of information because I was listening to your show in January
[20:42.120 --> 20:48.120]  and you were describing a case against your friend's business not being licensed.
[20:48.120 --> 20:52.120]  And so I am actually planning on starting my own business.
[20:52.120 --> 20:56.120]  When you say licensed, what are we talking about?
[20:56.120 --> 21:01.120]  What they came after you, your friend's business.
[21:01.120 --> 21:04.120]  Well, that was not licensing.
[21:04.120 --> 21:13.120]  That was because I refused to be a uncompensated tax collector for the state.
[21:13.120 --> 21:27.120]  They came after me because I refused to accept a sales tax certificate so that I could charge and collect tax on behalf of the state without compensation by the state.
[21:27.120 --> 21:34.120]  They wanted me to work as their tax collector, but they didn't want to pay me an hourly wage or anything like that to do it.
[21:34.120 --> 21:37.120]  They wanted me to do it for free at my own expense.
[21:37.120 --> 21:54.120]  That's what happened. Not to mention the fact that the state law here, when you actually read it, only makes corporations that are not headquartered in the state of Texas legally liable for the collection and paying of sales tax to the state.
[21:54.120 --> 21:58.120]  It's got nothing to do with personal businesses like mine was.
[21:58.120 --> 22:00.120]  Mine was the sole proprietorship.
[22:00.120 --> 22:07.120]  I was the only owner, not incorporated in any way or anything like that, or headquartered corporations here in the state.
[22:07.120 --> 22:13.120]  They're not required, according to the statutes, to charge sales tax and collect it and pay it.
[22:13.120 --> 22:18.120]  And I refused to do it because I wasn't getting paid to do it.
[22:18.120 --> 22:26.120]  So when you say that, I think I'm talking about, I believe it was a well-digging company.
[22:26.120 --> 22:29.120]  That's an irrigation company.
[22:29.120 --> 22:32.120]  Gotcha. And you had an interest in that company.
[22:32.120 --> 22:33.120]  Yes.
[22:33.120 --> 22:39.120]  So you were representing, I would guess?
[22:39.120 --> 22:42.120]  No, I helped him out. I was not representing him.
[22:42.120 --> 22:51.120]  I was representing the business as someone with an interest in the business, which I'm perfectly allowed to do.
[22:51.120 --> 23:01.120]  But the point being that what the state was trying to do was assess an administrative fee against the man, not the business, but the man.
[23:01.120 --> 23:02.120]  Gotcha.
[23:02.120 --> 23:11.120]  And he did not have one of their licenses to give them a nexus to go after the man.
[23:11.120 --> 23:24.120]  Under the laws it's written here for irrigators, the only penalty that could be assessed to get someone that does not have one of their license to be an irrigator
[23:24.120 --> 23:36.120]  and who is doing the work of an irrigator is to charge them with a $200, up to a $200 Class C fine-only offense.
[23:36.120 --> 23:47.120]  So they could fine him up to $200 if they convicted him of a Class C misdemeanor for not having a license and working as an irrigator.
[23:47.120 --> 23:50.120]  But that is a criminal charge here.
[23:50.120 --> 23:52.120]  It's not an administrative charge.
[23:52.120 --> 23:58.120]  It is outside of the jurisdiction of an administrative court or the state administrative agency.
[23:58.120 --> 24:01.120]  It's not within their purview at all.
[24:01.120 --> 24:11.120]  But they were attempting nonetheless to assess administrative fines against him that the law does not allow.
[24:11.120 --> 24:26.120]  They were trying to use the fines and everything that were authorized to be used against completely different types of businesses relating to health and safety and the water in the state,
[24:26.120 --> 24:31.120]  but had nothing to do with an irrigator.
[24:31.120 --> 24:38.120]  But they were attempting to assess him $6,000 a day in fines under those laws that didn't apply to him at all.
[24:38.120 --> 24:41.120]  Okay, understood.
[24:41.120 --> 24:57.120]  So I was doing research on the code of pertaining to a business that I would like to start, and I couldn't find any reference in the code to anything substantially close to what I would like to start.
[24:57.120 --> 24:59.120]  Which is?
[24:59.120 --> 25:14.120]  Like commercial cleaning, sort of like going to office buildings and taking out contracts with people to come in.
[25:14.120 --> 25:15.120]  Right.
[25:15.120 --> 25:26.120]  So I was wondering, do I need to get ready for any sort of board or administrative processes that would come after me for not having licensing?
[25:26.120 --> 25:35.120]  If there's no law, if you can show that there's no law in the state that covers what you do, then that's the preparation you need.
[25:35.120 --> 25:43.120]  That doesn't mean they're not going to come after you because they love to lie and start a fight and take money from people whether they owe it to them or not.
[25:43.120 --> 25:58.120]  But the fact is, if you know for a fact that there is no law that supports their position to come after you for having this kind of business, then you can fight back and sue the crap out of them for malicious prosecution.
[25:58.120 --> 26:02.120]  And for every dime they cost you to fight back.
[26:02.120 --> 26:14.120]  Now that being said, while you may not need to be licensed, you need to consider the possibility of the places that you're working giving you a problem.
[26:14.120 --> 26:23.120]  If they say something like, well, we've got property or money or things like that that turned up missing after you came in and did this job.
[26:23.120 --> 26:36.120]  So in which case the one thing you're going to want to be is bonded to cover any allegations like that or they're going to come after you directly and take it out of your pocket specifically.
[26:36.120 --> 26:39.120]  You see what I'm saying?
[26:39.120 --> 26:48.120]  There's always something to watch out for and the way the attorneys have set our society up to be so litigious.
[26:48.120 --> 26:53.120]  It doesn't mean it's not even going to matter if they have proof that you did it or not.
[26:53.120 --> 27:07.120]  If they can make a case based upon the way they want to spend something in surveillance video footage or the fact that you were the only person with access at the time and blah, blah, blah, it isn't going to matter whether you're guilty or not of having done anything.
[27:07.120 --> 27:09.120]  They're going to press it like you are.
[27:09.120 --> 27:19.120]  And you're going to have to be prepared for that and you're going to have to have a means if they're successful to pay for it that doesn't bankrupt you.
[27:19.120 --> 27:20.120]  Thank you.
[27:20.120 --> 27:25.120]  So when you say bonded, does that mean by contract or what is that specific?
[27:25.120 --> 27:27.120]  Well, every bond is a contract.
[27:27.120 --> 27:30.120]  It's basically a form of insurance.
[27:30.120 --> 27:31.120]  Okay.
[27:31.120 --> 27:43.120]  Okay, so basically what they do is they indentify you against any suit or loss incurred in the course of your business, just like any insurance company would.
[27:43.120 --> 27:44.120]  Awesome.
[27:44.120 --> 27:45.120]  Great.
[27:45.120 --> 27:47.120]  That's beautiful information.
[27:47.120 --> 27:58.120]  So when they come after me, is there a specific reference that I need or just pretty much the proof that there is no law pertaining to what I'm doing?
[27:58.120 --> 28:03.120]  Well, when they come after you, they're going to start citing statutes.
[28:03.120 --> 28:06.120]  What you've got to know is what those statutes say.
[28:06.120 --> 28:15.120]  So anything they say you're in violation of, you need to make dang sure you read it and don't read just what they cite.
[28:15.120 --> 28:29.120]  If they cite something like 61-007-67, you want to read everything that is encompassed in that first number prior to that first dash.
[28:29.120 --> 28:30.120]  Okay.
[28:30.120 --> 28:31.120]  Gotcha.
[28:31.120 --> 28:39.120]  Because that has to all be read as a whole in order to fully understand how it works.
[28:39.120 --> 28:52.120]  If they only read one single piece of it, they're not looking at the whole picture because the piece that they're reading down here may have 14 other requirements somewhere else in that same chapter.
[28:52.120 --> 29:01.120]  And they must all exist before the section they're pointing at would even apply, and they may not.
[29:01.120 --> 29:02.120]  Wonderful.
[29:02.120 --> 29:16.120]  And this is what you're going to find in most of these bureaucratic entities is that they like to take one piece of the law and act like it's the only piece that matters, and it isn't.
[29:16.120 --> 29:18.120]  Absolutely.
[29:18.120 --> 29:19.120]  Okay.
[29:19.120 --> 29:20.120]  Awesome.
[29:20.120 --> 29:21.120]  Thank you.
[29:21.120 --> 29:22.120]  You're very welcome.
[29:22.120 --> 29:23.120]  That was beautiful information.
[29:23.120 --> 29:24.120]  Thank you so much.
[29:24.120 --> 29:25.120]  You're very welcome.
[29:25.120 --> 29:26.120]  Wonderful night.
[29:26.120 --> 29:27.120]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[29:27.120 --> 29:28.120]  Thank you.
[29:28.120 --> 29:29.120]  Yes, ma'am.
[29:29.120 --> 29:30.120]  Bye-bye.
[29:30.120 --> 29:32.120]  All right, now let's see.
[29:32.120 --> 29:35.120]  Well, we had our other caller up and disappear here.
[29:35.120 --> 29:37.120]  All right, that's our music for the break.
[29:37.120 --> 29:40.120]  Y'all hang on, and we will be right back on the other side.
[29:40.120 --> 29:43.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig.
[29:43.120 --> 29:48.120]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:48.120 --> 29:52.120]  Give us a call, get in line, ask us a question, tell us we're good, whatever.
[29:52.120 --> 30:01.120]  We'll be right back after this break.
[30:01.120 --> 30:25.120]  We'll be right back.
[30:25.120 --> 30:41.120]  We'll be right back.
[30:41.120 --> 31:06.120]  We'll be right back.
[31:06.120 --> 31:31.120]  We'll be right back.
[31:31.120 --> 32:00.120]  We'll be right back.
[32:01.120 --> 32:27.120]  We'll be right back.
[32:27.120 --> 32:53.120]  We'll be right back.
[32:53.120 --> 33:19.120]  We'll be right back.
[33:19.120 --> 33:48.120]  We'll be right back.
[33:48.120 --> 33:50.120]  Folks, we are back.
[33:50.120 --> 33:52.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:52.120 --> 33:57.120]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[33:57.120 --> 33:59.120]  All right, who do we got where here?
[33:59.120 --> 34:00.120]  Let's see.
[34:00.120 --> 34:02.120]  We have Mike in Indiana.
[34:02.120 --> 34:05.120]  Mike, what can we do for you?
[34:05.120 --> 34:09.120]  Hey Eddie, I got a couple questions for you.
[34:09.120 --> 34:13.120]  I've had a driver's license that's been expired for around four years now.
[34:13.120 --> 34:18.120]  I'm living in a different state than where I had the license.
[34:18.120 --> 34:21.120]  I spoke with you about a couple of years ago.
[34:21.120 --> 34:29.120]  I recall and you suggested that you ideally want to write in and get a certified copy of your driving history
[34:29.120 --> 34:35.120]  to prove that the license simply expired and there was no issues or anything up to that expiration
[34:35.120 --> 34:42.120]  and that you wanted to continue to do so, I think maybe with every quarter or so for a while.
[34:42.120 --> 34:49.120]  Yeah, what you want to be able to show is that there were no outstanding violations or suspensions
[34:49.120 --> 34:58.120]  or anything on the license when it expired, that it did expire as a matter of law on a particular date
[34:58.120 --> 35:06.120]  and that for X amount of time after that, nothing else appeared on the record, hence the periodic updates.
[35:06.120 --> 35:16.120]  So what I would recommend is once your license expires, you immediately get a copy of that record
[35:16.120 --> 35:25.120]  and then you do it every quarter for the next year so that you can show that for it's been expired for a year
[35:25.120 --> 35:35.120]  there's nothing that's popped up on the record since, blah, blah, blah, or you can see when someone did unlawfully alter the record
[35:35.120 --> 35:41.120]  and you'll know exactly which quarter it occurred in because it wasn't on the first three if it's in the last one only, right?
[35:41.120 --> 35:42.120]  Yeah.
[35:42.120 --> 35:48.120]  So that narrows down the ability to determine when and who may have altered that record illegally?
[35:48.120 --> 35:49.120]  Yeah.
[35:49.120 --> 35:56.120]  Okay, so given that, you're right, we've probably had that conversation.
[35:56.120 --> 36:05.120]  The issue is basically I was lazy and it's been four years or it's been two years since we had the conversation. I haven't done that. I haven't had any issues or anything.
[36:05.120 --> 36:15.120]  But at this point, I still want to get on doing this at this because we're at like four years worth of X that's being expired.
[36:15.120 --> 36:19.120]  Should I just go ahead and do the same thing from here to the next year?
[36:19.120 --> 36:32.120]  Well, if it's been expired for four years, then I would guess that one record showing that there's nothing outstanding on it at any point in time up to this time would be fine.
[36:32.120 --> 36:34.120]  You shouldn't have to go that.
[36:34.120 --> 36:53.120]  It's like I say, generally what I would recommend you do is if you do get a citation for anything, then you turn around and repeat this process immediately file for a copy of your record as it exists as soon as you get the citation.
[36:53.120 --> 36:54.120]  Okay.
[36:54.120 --> 37:06.120]  And then do it every amount of time after that that you think would be necessary depending upon what your timeframe is to respond to that ticket.
[37:06.120 --> 37:11.120]  Because odds are they're going to try to put a notice on your old license number.
[37:11.120 --> 37:20.120]  So somewhere in that timeframe is when they would have to alter that record, which would be prior to your actual trial date at maximum.
[37:20.120 --> 37:28.120]  So that could be anywhere from 30 days to a year or two, you know, you just don't know.
[37:28.120 --> 37:40.120]  But what you do want to know is when they sent information to your old licensing state and somebody in that state tampered with that record.
[37:40.120 --> 37:41.120]  Wonderful.
[37:41.120 --> 37:42.120]  Okay.
[37:42.120 --> 37:44.120]  I got it.
[37:44.120 --> 37:50.120]  And I think that's about all I need on that issue.
[37:50.120 --> 37:51.120]  Okay.
[37:51.120 --> 37:58.120]  Second question is I hope you don't mind if I ask this, but do you personally have any sort of government issued photo ID at this point that's valid?
[37:58.120 --> 37:59.120]  I do not.
[37:59.120 --> 38:00.120]  I do not.
[38:00.120 --> 38:09.120]  The only thing I have issued by government is a copy of my original birth certificate, which by the way, people is in proper case in its entirety.
[38:09.120 --> 38:14.120]  There's not a single all case anything on it so much for that theory.
[38:14.120 --> 38:16.120]  Haha.
[38:16.120 --> 38:20.120]  I'm only 30 and I'm actually in the same example.
[38:20.120 --> 38:23.120]  I have an original copy and it's written properly as well.
[38:23.120 --> 38:24.120]  So yeah.
[38:24.120 --> 38:26.120]  Just that it carries out the window.
[38:26.120 --> 38:32.120]  With that being said, I'm curious if let's say you need to get an affidavit notarized.
[38:32.120 --> 38:38.120]  What do you use to do that if in the event like I go to a notary who already knows me personally.
[38:38.120 --> 38:46.120]  If a notary knows you, the notary is not required to get ID from you.
[38:46.120 --> 38:53.120]  The notary can simply sign this person is known by me to be such and such person.
[38:53.120 --> 39:04.120]  And so for years, I've been lucky enough that I've had friends and close family members and friends and girlfriends and aunts and uncles and all this.
[39:04.120 --> 39:07.120]  Somebody's a notary all the time somewhere.
[39:07.120 --> 39:09.120]  Yeah.
[39:09.120 --> 39:17.120]  The reason I asked is in the past I've been lucky enough to have that that I had a notary that was personally known and would do that.
[39:17.120 --> 39:20.120]  But now that I'm in a new area, I don't have that.
[39:20.120 --> 39:23.120]  And I was curious if you had any opinions as to.
[39:23.120 --> 39:35.120]  I know some people do a thing like you go basically create your own private identification and you go into a notary with two people and have them swear out that you are who you would say you are.
[39:35.120 --> 39:37.120]  And lastly, then you bring a birth certificate in.
[39:37.120 --> 39:39.120]  Do you have any opinions as to doing that?
[39:39.120 --> 39:43.120]  They won't even take a birth certificate because there's no picture on it.
[39:43.120 --> 39:45.120]  Do I have an opinion on it?
[39:45.120 --> 39:46.120]  Absolutely.
[39:46.120 --> 39:48.120]  Does it make any difference to the notary?
[39:48.120 --> 39:51.120]  Absolutely not.
[39:51.120 --> 40:00.120]  So in that event, if you're like you have a court case coming up or something and you don't have any government photo ID and you have to get some notarized.
[40:00.120 --> 40:03.120]  Then I would do it at the court.
[40:03.120 --> 40:04.120]  Okay.
[40:04.120 --> 40:08.120]  Because they're going to sit there and say, are you such and such?
[40:08.120 --> 40:21.120]  If it's good enough for them to accept it when you say in the courtroom, yeah, that's me, then why isn't it good enough for their notary in that court to say, well, if you say that's you and you sign this, okay.
[40:21.120 --> 40:36.120]  But as an example, if you had a case coming up and you hadn't yet to go to your first appearance and you hadn't actually been in the courtroom at the seated court, maybe I should say.
[40:36.120 --> 40:42.120]  And how would you go about doing that to get it notarized prior to your first appearance?
[40:42.120 --> 41:01.120]  Well, again, it's same principle. If you're going to be filing pleadings in the case and they're going to be accepting those as being from the person named on the document, then what justification could they turn around and say, well, I don't believe this is you when it comes to verifying that document for you?
[41:01.120 --> 41:02.120]  Okay.
[41:02.120 --> 41:05.120]  Have you ever heard of that happening or any issues?
[41:05.120 --> 41:14.120]  In a court case, I have never had a court clerk refuse to notarize a document for me if they're a notary.
[41:14.120 --> 41:16.120]  Okay.
[41:16.120 --> 41:25.120]  Okay, and that's without showing them any ID. I said, look, this is my case. This is my citation. That's me named on the paper. Sign the damn thing, please.
[41:25.120 --> 41:30.120]  Otherwise, you're interfering with my access to the court.
[41:30.120 --> 41:34.120]  Okay.
[41:34.120 --> 41:36.120]  Great.
[41:36.120 --> 41:42.120]  And other than that, have you possibly gotten on a plane any time recently?
[41:42.120 --> 41:58.120]  The last airplane I got on without being behind the stick was when I went to New York with Randy, and I didn't have any ID then except for an old expired copy of my license and my birth certificate.
[41:58.120 --> 42:01.120]  And I made it through everything just fine.
[42:01.120 --> 42:03.120]  Okay.
[42:03.120 --> 42:15.120]  See, the thing about the licenses, I know what they try to tell you, but if you ask anybody associated with them, the license has your picture on it, right?
[42:15.120 --> 42:16.120]  Correct.
[42:16.120 --> 42:29.120]  It has an expiration date to act as a license, but it has no expiration date for acting as a state-issued photo ID.
[42:29.120 --> 42:33.120]  One would think, but I...
[42:33.120 --> 42:41.120]  Well, that's just a simple fact. That doesn't mean they're going to take it, and it doesn't mean they're going to do what it says, even though your picture's right there on it.
[42:41.120 --> 42:49.120]  They want to go by that date, even though that date is absolutely irrelevant to the purpose for which they're trying to use it.
[42:49.120 --> 42:59.120]  Well, absolutely. I mean, I've been denied access to just a bar because it's expired, so apparently I'm retroactively no longer the age that I am.
[42:59.120 --> 43:07.120]  Exactly. How stupid is that? Suddenly, you're not you because the picture of you has a date on it.
[43:07.120 --> 43:13.120]  What the hell are they going to do with ones when your camera stamps a date on it? Well, this can't be you. This picture's three years old.
[43:13.120 --> 43:16.120]  Yeah.
[43:16.120 --> 43:29.120]  I mean, is that stupid or is that stupid? Nobody looks at your photo album and says, this thing's got a stamp date on it of 1984. That can't be you.
[43:29.120 --> 43:34.120]  But they do it. That just shows you how ignorant bureaucrats are.
[43:34.120 --> 43:37.120]  Yeah.
[43:37.120 --> 43:40.120]  Um, I have one other thing. If you have the time, if not...
[43:40.120 --> 43:44.120]  Okay. Well, hang on just a minute, and we'll get you on the other side of the break, okay?
[43:44.120 --> 43:47.120]  I appreciate it. Yes, sir. All right, folks, we're about to take another break.
[43:47.120 --> 43:52.120]  Calling number is 512-646-1984.
[43:52.120 --> 44:00.120]  Give us a call, get in line, and let's talk. We'll be right back.
[44:00.120 --> 44:03.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.120 --> 44:15.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.120 --> 44:22.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.120 --> 44:27.120]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.120 --> 44:34.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.120 --> 44:43.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.120 --> 44:52.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro-save tactics, and much more.
[44:52.120 --> 45:01.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[45:01.120 --> 45:13.120]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from natures2organics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.120 --> 45:19.120]  Find brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.120 --> 45:23.120]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.120 --> 45:31.120]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.120 --> 45:38.120]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at natures2organics.com.
[45:38.120 --> 45:44.120]  That's 512-264-4043 natures2organics.com.
[45:44.120 --> 45:48.120]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.120 --> 45:51.120]  naturespureorganics.com
[46:18.120 --> 46:31.120]  I take you to see the news today. They say the danger has gone away, but I can see the fires in the light.
[46:31.120 --> 46:41.120]  Burning into the night. There's too many things. Too many people speaking too many problems.
[46:41.120 --> 46:51.120]  And I'm about to love you around. Can't you feel it in my empty future?
[46:51.120 --> 46:56.120]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:56.120 --> 47:02.120]  Call in number 512-646-1984 and we are talking to Mike in Indiana.
[47:02.120 --> 47:05.120]  Alright Mike, what's that last thing you got?
[47:05.120 --> 47:09.120]  Alright, my question is about passports and social security numbers.
[47:09.120 --> 47:20.120]  It's my understanding that as of about the last year or so, they are not issuing them if you do not put down an identifying number.
[47:20.120 --> 47:23.120]  And it seems to me that that would be in violation of the Privacy Act.
[47:23.120 --> 47:28.120]  It is a violation of Privacy Act and who is they?
[47:28.120 --> 47:45.120]  The Department of State is failing to issue it and basically sending you a rejection letter and saying you either have to provide us with an affidavit stating that a number has never been issued or you have to put a number basically.
[47:45.120 --> 47:55.120]  Well, then I would complain to whoever is above them. I would start that ball rolling uphill really quick.
[47:55.120 --> 48:02.120]  Because they cannot create policy in violation of federal law.
[48:02.120 --> 48:10.120]  The Privacy Act has not been repealed. The Privacy Act has not been superseded by any existing law.
[48:10.120 --> 48:26.120]  If there is a law saying that a social security number is required for an American individual to receive a passport, that's a direct violation not only of the Social Security Act but of the Privacy Statement.
[48:26.120 --> 48:29.120]  Okay.
[48:29.120 --> 48:36.120]  So somebody's boss needs to be made aware that there is an employee trying to write their own law.
[48:36.120 --> 49:00.120]  Okay. So I'm thinking the way to go about that in the case somebody who's never had a passport before is go ahead and apply, not put a number down, wait for the denial, and then go ahead and send them a notice that, okay, look, you're in violation of the Privacy Act, cite everything, and give them a chance to go ahead and process the application.
[49:00.120 --> 49:09.120]  Correct. You've got to go through all the administrative process and be denied all the way through first or you don't have standing to go above that as far as suing somebody.
[49:09.120 --> 49:19.120]  But right now, I mean, depending upon which circuit you fall under, the case law will either be for or against you.
[49:19.120 --> 49:32.120]  If you're in the night circuit, then you do have no hope of getting the law obeyed. The night circuit is the most idiotic group of morons with the authority to declare something I have ever seen.
[49:32.120 --> 49:43.120]  The simplest, most fundamental thought process that American has on rights and freedoms, those idiots can't even begin to comprehend.
[49:43.120 --> 49:46.120]  Yep.
[49:46.120 --> 49:53.120]  They ought to call them the night circuit. They ought to call them the night circuit.
[49:53.120 --> 49:56.120]  All right. Anything else?
[49:56.120 --> 50:06.120]  I can't tell you how it will all work out, but I can tell you that somewhere, if you fight back hard enough, there will be a remedy because the law is in your favor.
[50:06.120 --> 50:12.120]  It may require you to sue the crap out of somebody, but that can still be done.
[50:12.120 --> 50:16.120]  I wanted to get the ball rolling with it and kind of see where it goes.
[50:16.120 --> 50:22.120]  Well, keep very good records. Don't lose any paperwork, including envelopes. Make sure you keep everything organized.
[50:22.120 --> 50:30.120]  Make sure that you record any phone conversations, names, telephone numbers, job titles, dates, all of it.
[50:30.120 --> 50:35.120]  Keep track of everything. Document your case from the very beginning.
[50:35.120 --> 50:37.120]  Okay.
[50:37.120 --> 50:47.120]  And don't just leave it on a computer. Make sure to print you out a hard copy file, as well as what you keep on your computer, because that's going to be small enough you should be able to do that pretty easily.
[50:47.120 --> 50:51.120]  Yeah.
[50:51.120 --> 50:56.120]  All right. Well, I got one more, but I'll get off here so you can get somebody else on there.
[50:56.120 --> 50:59.120]  Well, what's the one more, and is it short?
[50:59.120 --> 51:11.120]  It's fairly short. It's more of a discussion. I think it might take some time. It's more concerned with the ramifications of declaring residency within a state by, for example, getting a state ID.
[51:11.120 --> 51:20.120]  Okay. Well, here's the thing. I have an article on my legal blog dealing with domicile versus residency. You need to go read that.
[51:20.120 --> 51:22.120]  Okay.
[51:22.120 --> 51:24.120]  You know where the address is?
[51:24.120 --> 51:25.120]  Yes, I sure do.
[51:25.120 --> 51:32.120]  Okay. Yeah. Just look on there somewhere. There's an entire article on domicile versus resident.
[51:32.120 --> 51:33.120]  Okay.
[51:33.120 --> 51:34.120]  Okay.
[51:34.120 --> 51:35.120]  All right.
[51:35.120 --> 51:38.120]  I'll give that a read and maybe call back in next week. I appreciate it.
[51:38.120 --> 51:40.120]  Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
[51:40.120 --> 51:41.120]  Thank you.
[51:41.120 --> 51:42.120]  Yes, sir. Bye-bye.
[51:42.120 --> 51:48.120]  All right. Now we have Keith in West Virginia. Keith, what can we do for you?
[51:48.120 --> 51:56.120]  I appreciate that I'm doing the show here. I just want to thank you for what you do. Definitely. I was trying to hang in there with you.
[51:56.120 --> 52:01.120]  But I wanted to kind of touch base and kind of reaffirm what you said in your monologue.
[52:01.120 --> 52:13.120]  And I'm kind of an example of myself acting before you know fully what you're doing because it can get real, real quick, whether it be on the side of the road or in the court.
[52:13.120 --> 52:22.120]  But anyways, I'm working my way back out of it. But as I said, I basically got in some trouble with some fines and whatnot.
[52:22.120 --> 52:32.120]  A couple of times I think I basically scared them to think, made them think I knew enough what I was going to scare them to drop them or dismiss the charges.
[52:32.120 --> 52:44.120]  Okay, several of them stuck though. So I got several fines, driving fines on my record. If you were in my position, would you take care of those before moving forward?
[52:44.120 --> 52:54.120]  Well, it depends on what you mean by taking care of. Knowing what I know, I would go back to challenging the original jurisdiction to have the conviction for them in the first place.
[52:54.120 --> 53:02.120]  If I wasn't engaged in the activity to which the law applied, I certainly can't be punished under that law. End of discussion.
[53:02.120 --> 53:06.120]  The jurisdiction has no time limit, correct?
[53:06.120 --> 53:20.120]  Subject matter jurisdiction, does it? And that's exactly what we're talking about. If the laws governing the act are not applicable to you because your act does not fall under those laws,
[53:20.120 --> 53:36.120]  then how can they convict you under that law for an act that it doesn't apply to? That's subject matter jurisdiction. It doesn't exist. Therefore, you can challenge it at any time.
[53:36.120 --> 53:54.120]  Good deal. Two more things. The internet classes, I've heard you speak about them a couple times as far as you're trying to get some kind of internet access class on whether it be a webcam or however you do it, but any further progress in that?
[53:54.120 --> 54:07.120]  With all the things on my plate right now, that's taken a backseat to everything. Mainly because anything that I do in that online class is going to be fundamentally based on everything that's in this seminar material to begin with.
[54:07.120 --> 54:25.120]  So the course material would actually be very similar to what we're already talking about in all the seminar material, okay? The seminar material benefit would be that you would actually have the legal pleadings and the books and everything to actually sit down and use
[54:25.120 --> 54:38.120]  rather than having to try to write everything up on your own again, something I've already am trying to do. So having an online course competing with the same time for the same thing,
[54:38.120 --> 54:48.120]  though I'm not making anything except what's coming in on donations right now, which is very little by the way, folks, and I'm not saying that for me personally but for the network as a whole.
[54:48.120 --> 55:03.120]  So if you can do something about that and have the opportunity, please do so. I mean, I'm living tooth and nail here just to pay the bills on what I've got because I don't have any money coming in from a Sunday class like I used to.
[55:03.120 --> 55:19.120]  And this online class is actually costing me money to maintain but I can't do anything with it until I've got the groundwork laid for making a class because I want to do the format online like an actual class.
[55:19.120 --> 55:33.120]  There's going to be specific sessions for specific subjects. There's going to be specific testing material for that subject and there's going to be specific review criteria for that subject.
[55:33.120 --> 55:48.120]  So it's going to operate like an actual class but I want everything ready when I do that. I don't want to have to try to do them both at the same time because then I could wind up giving out something that today is not what I'm giving out tomorrow
[55:48.120 --> 55:55.120]  because I realized it's different. It needs to be different. See what I'm saying?
[55:55.120 --> 55:56.120]  Sir.
[55:56.120 --> 56:02.120]  I want all my ducks in a row so I can kill them all with one shotgun chill.
[56:02.120 --> 56:13.120]  And you do well at it. I did donate a week or so ago and definitely anybody that's calling in, I mean, value for value. You don't get something without giving something that's true blue.
[56:13.120 --> 56:23.120]  Last thing, well, two things here. Update of course material, seminar material. What's the best way to contact and get that?
[56:23.120 --> 56:32.120]  If you actually don't have the current seminar then you can go online to the LogosRadioNetwork.com website and order it direct from there.
[56:32.120 --> 56:45.120]  Once you've done that, Deborah will send you within 24 to 48 hours, she will send you an email with your user ID and login information to download the material.
[56:45.120 --> 57:01.120]  Once she sends you that email, you send a copy of that email forwarded over to me and I reply back with any updated documents that I've got if I've got anything newer than what you're downloading.
[57:01.120 --> 57:10.120]  I bought one at the one time. I don't know, a year and a half, two, even more good, but I believe you did update it since then.
[57:10.120 --> 57:27.120]  Okay, then if you need to find your original email and if you can't, then email Deborah with the original email address that you purchased it with and she will send you a new login email and everything and you forward that over to me and I will email back the updates.
[57:27.120 --> 57:43.120]  Now of course if you will let me know what the email address is, send me an email. I can check and see if I already have it, but just in case, you know, I've got all of my stuff online so it should be there unless something happens on their end.
[57:43.120 --> 57:57.120]  So if you will send me what the original email address was, I can see if I have the email Deborah originally sent you because I keep all of the seminar purchase emails I receive from listeners.
[57:57.120 --> 58:07.120]  I keep those in a particular folder in my email account so I can always do a mass update if I have one.
[58:07.120 --> 58:09.120]  Understood, I appreciate it Eddie.
[58:09.120 --> 58:10.120]  Yes sir.
[58:10.120 --> 58:12.120]  Alright, thanks for calling in.
[58:12.120 --> 58:18.120]  Alright folks, this has been the first hour of the Bundy Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[58:18.120 --> 58:27.120]  I want to thank all of our callers so far and all those people waiting on the board. I will get to y'all just as soon as I can get back off of this break so y'all please hang in there.
[58:27.120 --> 58:37.120]  For folks that are still listening before the break, 512-646-1984 is the calling number. If you've got something you want to ask about, please do so.
[58:37.120 --> 58:42.120]  Alright folks, y'all hang on and we will be right back after this break.
[59:07.120 --> 59:18.120]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.120 --> 59:28.120]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.120 --> 59:44.120]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.120 --> 59:51.120]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.120 --> 59:59.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:00:21.120 --> 01:00:40.120]  Bitcoin's at $9,883.87, Ethereum's $748.18, Bitcoin cashed $1,086.63, and finally Litecoin's at $181.10, a crypto coin.
[01:00:40.120 --> 01:00:55.120]  Okay, in history. The year 1989, Iran and the United Kingdom break diplomatic relations after a fight over Simon Rushdie's controversial novel, The Cetanic Versus, saying history.
[01:00:55.120 --> 01:01:11.120]  In recent news, President Trump's top economic advisor, Gary D. Cohn, stated yesterday, Tuesday, that he was indeed resigning, this after giving a heads up last week, that he was considering doing so if President Trump decided to follow through with his tariffs on imported aluminum and steel.
[01:01:11.120 --> 01:01:27.120]  Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed levy tariffs on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure seems obvious for many, considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents of any such measures in the administration.
[01:01:27.120 --> 01:01:44.120]  According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jantz out of the University of Tennessee believes he may have found the skeletal remains of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific Island. Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator Fred Newton were never to be found.
[01:01:44.120 --> 01:02:09.120]  At least until now, Richard Jantz stated that, what I can say scientifically is that they, the recent Pacific Island remains, are 99% likely to be hers. Interesting timing for this finding to be released, considering that the 1932 Hudson Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, was reportedly stolen on Friday, February 23, 2018, only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood in L.A.
[01:02:09.120 --> 01:02:25.120]  The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, with the top 10 currencies suffering 5-10% losses. This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them.
[01:02:25.120 --> 01:02:41.120]  According to the SEC statement, quote, if a platform offers trading of digital assets that are securities and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws, then the platform must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or be exempt from registration.
[01:02:41.120 --> 01:02:59.120]  The low-star lowdown is looking for sponsors. If you're a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me call it 210-363-2257. This was Rick Rodey with your lowdown for March 7, 2018.
[01:03:12.120 --> 01:03:19.120]  The growth of old maters and homemade wine and the country boy can survive.
[01:03:19.120 --> 01:03:23.120]  Country folks can survive.
[01:03:23.120 --> 01:03:43.120]  Because you can't survive a bout and you can't make a run, those wasn't old boys raised on shotguns. We say craze, we say ma'am, if you ain't in the best, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:43.120 --> 01:03:53.120]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky mountains and the western stars.
[01:03:53.120 --> 01:04:08.120]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We are now in our second hour. Call in number 512-646-1984 and we had a caller drop off who is back now. Eric in California. Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:04:08.120 --> 01:04:25.120]  I've been doing a lot of research and had some questions through discovery. One of them was what is your thought on the affidavit of non-use of your automobile if you do have it registered? Is that something that you recommend people do?
[01:04:25.120 --> 01:04:48.120]  Well, I don't know what you're talking about when you say an affidavit of non-use. Because if it's what I think you're asking about, then you've got a contradiction here. You registered it for the use and now you're trying to write a separate affidavit that says that's not the use. Do you see a problem here?
[01:04:48.120 --> 01:05:00.120]  Not exactly. It says here that you can declare your vehicle as nothing operated or parked on any California roadway.
[01:05:00.120 --> 01:05:22.120]  Yeah, but that's not what they're going to say that means. They're going to say that the vehicle quote unquote is inoperable or is sitting by itself out in the field or your driveway and no one's taking it around as a conveyance.
[01:05:22.120 --> 01:05:43.120]  Now, the other form of non-use that I was saying about what you're talking about is when you say it's not being used as a motor vehicle, which would be contradictory to the registration for the purpose of using it as a motor vehicle. See what I'm saying?
[01:05:43.120 --> 01:05:53.120]  What's your advice then? My registration has expired in March and I'm at the point now where they're setting the late fees.
[01:05:53.120 --> 01:05:56.120]  You said you're in California, right?
[01:05:56.120 --> 01:05:57.120]  Correct.
[01:05:57.120 --> 01:06:14.120]  Okay, then what you can do is send them information stating that your previous registration was a mistake. Your car is not used for commercial purposes pursuant California code blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and there's the one in there that specifically says those codes are commercial.
[01:06:14.120 --> 01:06:25.120]  Okay, and that your car is a recreational vehicle under California statute blah, blah, blah, and it's not required to be registered.
[01:06:25.120 --> 01:06:28.120]  You said that my vehicle would be...
[01:06:28.120 --> 01:06:40.120]  That your car is a recreational vehicle according to California law because it's not used for commercial purposes and therefore is not required to be registered.
[01:06:40.120 --> 01:06:56.120]  Okay, and then as far as the commercial applicability of the cars out here, the only thing I've come across is the rules of the road where it states...
[01:06:56.120 --> 01:06:59.120]  No, that's not the only thing there is. Trust me.
[01:06:59.120 --> 01:07:01.120]  Okay.
[01:07:01.120 --> 01:07:22.120]  See, here in Texas you have the whole code and then you have subtitle C of that code which is only one very small part encompassing chapters 541 through 600 and it is entitled Rules of the Road.
[01:07:22.120 --> 01:07:29.120]  It's not by any means the whole code, not in any way, shape, or form.
[01:07:29.120 --> 01:07:39.120]  Okay, in this part it said that these rules were exclusively to apply to the operation of vehicles so I thought maybe that was...
[01:07:39.120 --> 01:07:50.120]  Again, a recreational vehicle is not a vehicle. It's not a motor vehicle. It's not a commercial motor vehicle.
[01:07:50.120 --> 01:07:51.120]  Okay.
[01:07:51.120 --> 01:07:55.120]  It's a car. A car is not commercial, that term.
[01:07:55.120 --> 01:07:57.120]  Correct.
[01:07:57.120 --> 01:08:03.120]  Okay.
[01:08:03.120 --> 01:08:17.120]  And then as far as the notification, I would just draft up a letter and send it to the DMV saying that my car is now recreational and that it was registered in an air beforehand.
[01:08:17.120 --> 01:08:19.120]  Yes.
[01:08:19.120 --> 01:08:21.120]  Okay.
[01:08:21.120 --> 01:08:30.120]  And then recently I've used your seven interrogatories to take down a local cop in a city here.
[01:08:30.120 --> 01:08:44.120]  I started thinking about this because of the premise and nature of the civil infractions out here in California, does that give us the leeway to, let's say, speed or use the carpool lane?
[01:08:44.120 --> 01:09:06.120]  If the statute regulating speed specifically says that the only way to commit an offense under it for anyone, even those to whom that statute actually applies, is to cause injury to persons or property, then how fast you're going is absolutely irrelevant until that circumstance occurs.
[01:09:06.120 --> 01:09:07.120]  Okay.
[01:09:07.120 --> 01:09:16.120]  So here it's just negligence, but it didn't define negligence except negligence is already defined as a matter of law.
[01:09:16.120 --> 01:09:36.120]  Negligence, in and of itself, is an act for which there was a greater than possible danger to another person or their property that the perpetrator should have known and could have known was much more likely to be the result than not.
[01:09:36.120 --> 01:09:38.120]  Okay.
[01:09:38.120 --> 01:09:44.120]  In other words, it's that same principle of shooting a gun into a crowd.
[01:09:44.120 --> 01:09:45.120]  Okay.
[01:09:45.120 --> 01:09:49.120]  Doesn't matter if you actually hit anyone.
[01:09:49.120 --> 01:10:03.120]  The fact of the matter is, is that the risk of hitting someone was so great compared to the risk of not hitting someone that the act in and of itself was criminally negligent.
[01:10:03.120 --> 01:10:06.120]  Is that case law or is that black law?
[01:10:06.120 --> 01:10:08.120]  That's common sense.
[01:10:08.120 --> 01:10:12.120]  But yeah, that's case law.
[01:10:12.120 --> 01:10:14.120]  Okay.
[01:10:14.120 --> 01:10:16.120]  You have no offhand with case law.
[01:10:16.120 --> 01:10:19.120]  I do not because there's thousands of them.
[01:10:19.120 --> 01:10:20.120]  I'll look it up.
[01:10:20.120 --> 01:10:23.120]  Okay.
[01:10:23.120 --> 01:10:37.120]  And just through the research here, it looks like using a bicycle is the same thing. They use the same terminology as driving a vehicle or operating.
[01:10:37.120 --> 01:10:38.120]  Okay.
[01:10:38.120 --> 01:10:39.120]  That's being used.
[01:10:39.120 --> 01:10:41.120]  If the statutes, all right, let me ask a question.
[01:10:41.120 --> 01:10:47.120]  Are there businesses in California that use bicycles to perform delivery services of any kind?
[01:10:47.120 --> 01:10:49.120]  Probably.
[01:10:49.120 --> 01:10:57.120]  Is the delivery service using the road for that purpose actually engaging in commerce upon the road with the bicycle?
[01:10:57.120 --> 01:10:58.120]  Yes.
[01:10:58.120 --> 01:11:09.120]  Then why would you think that it would apply to something that isn't doing that any more than it would to a car that isn't doing that?
[01:11:09.120 --> 01:11:14.120]  No.
[01:11:14.120 --> 01:11:16.120]  Is that your answer?
[01:11:16.120 --> 01:11:17.120]  Yeah, that's my answer.
[01:11:17.120 --> 01:11:20.120]  Just running these questions by, I don't know.
[01:11:20.120 --> 01:11:23.120]  I'm doing the research and I'm going to cross stuff for the first time.
[01:11:23.120 --> 01:11:25.120]  It's a question of exclusion.
[01:11:25.120 --> 01:11:31.120]  If there is no commercial use, there is no applicability of the statute.
[01:11:31.120 --> 01:11:33.120]  End of discussion.
[01:11:33.120 --> 01:11:37.120]  Okay.
[01:11:37.120 --> 01:11:42.120]  Now, talk to a couple of CHP guys about this and they're like, they don't know any of this, obviously.
[01:11:42.120 --> 01:11:43.120]  Well, of course they don't.
[01:11:43.120 --> 01:11:45.120]  We would just tow your car.
[01:11:45.120 --> 01:11:47.120]  So what do you do when they tow the car?
[01:11:47.120 --> 01:11:56.120]  You sue the crap out of them.
[01:11:56.120 --> 01:11:59.120]  And then here's my point with that.
[01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:05.120]  Out here with the situation I've been in, I've reached out to a bunch of attorneys to try to sue the city.
[01:12:05.120 --> 01:12:08.120]  Why are you asking an attorney to help you?
[01:12:08.120 --> 01:12:12.120]  Why don't you learn to do it yourself?
[01:12:12.120 --> 01:12:16.120]  That's what I'm working on, but there's a time limit here where I got to get the...
[01:12:16.120 --> 01:12:18.120]  There's a time limit everywhere.
[01:12:18.120 --> 01:12:19.120]  What's your point?
[01:12:19.120 --> 01:12:21.120]  Yeah.
[01:12:21.120 --> 01:12:23.120]  I don't want to waste my time and go in there and get...
[01:12:23.120 --> 01:12:27.120]  Well, then you're going to take that risk every time you go out there without it then.
[01:12:27.120 --> 01:12:30.120]  End of story.
[01:12:30.120 --> 01:12:32.120]  Okay, let me put it this way.
[01:12:32.120 --> 01:12:39.120]  Do you consider going to work and earning a paycheck to pay your bills and have a roof over your head and food in your mouth a waste of time?
[01:12:39.120 --> 01:12:40.120]  No.
[01:12:40.120 --> 01:12:51.120]  Do you consider that all the effort you put into earning that money to buy your car, your bicycle, or any other piece of property that you want to be a waste of time if it got you what you wanted?
[01:12:51.120 --> 01:12:52.120]  No.
[01:12:52.120 --> 01:13:01.120]  Then why would you think learning how to sue these people in a court of law to make them stop is somehow a waste of time?
[01:13:01.120 --> 01:13:02.120]  No, no, no.
[01:13:02.120 --> 01:13:03.120]  I didn't mean like that.
[01:13:03.120 --> 01:13:06.120]  That's what I'm working on.
[01:13:06.120 --> 01:13:11.120]  Well, yeah, but you just said, I don't want to waste my time doing A, B, C, or D.
[01:13:11.120 --> 01:13:18.120]  And the problem here we have is you're not going to fix this problem without doing that.
[01:13:18.120 --> 01:13:25.120]  Unless you get elected to the legislature and manage to rewrite the law and get it passed that way.
[01:13:25.120 --> 01:13:26.120]  Okay.
[01:13:26.120 --> 01:13:34.120]  And even then they're still going to enforce it incorrectly and somebody else is going to have to do what you could have done at that time.
[01:13:34.120 --> 01:13:37.120]  I just want to make sure I'm going in a court prepared.
[01:13:37.120 --> 01:13:40.120]  Then get jurisdictionary and learn how to be prepared.
[01:13:40.120 --> 01:13:41.120]  That's what it's for.
[01:13:41.120 --> 01:13:42.120]  Okay.
[01:13:42.120 --> 01:13:56.120]  Now be aware that even though it teaches you an awful lot about how to file and maintain a lawsuit, it does not speak directly to all the issues involved in suing a governmental entity or employee.
[01:13:56.120 --> 01:14:07.120]  So you're going to have to expand beyond just what jurisdictionary tells you, but what it can show you for the basics and the foundation is invaluable.
[01:14:07.120 --> 01:14:12.120]  Okay.
[01:14:12.120 --> 01:14:13.120]  All right.
[01:14:13.120 --> 01:14:14.120]  All right.
[01:14:14.120 --> 01:14:15.120]  That's it for tonight.
[01:14:15.120 --> 01:14:16.120]  Okay.
[01:14:16.120 --> 01:14:17.120]  We'll thanks for calling in.
[01:14:17.120 --> 01:14:18.120]  Thank you.
[01:14:18.120 --> 01:14:19.120]  All right.
[01:14:19.120 --> 01:14:20.120]  All right.
[01:14:20.120 --> 01:14:21.120]  Bye-bye.
[01:14:21.120 --> 01:14:22.120]  All right.
[01:14:22.120 --> 01:14:23.120]  Now we have Charles and Georgia.
[01:14:23.120 --> 01:14:25.120]  Charles, what can we do for you?
[01:14:25.120 --> 01:14:26.120]  How are you doing tonight, Eddie?
[01:14:26.120 --> 01:14:27.120]  I'm doing good.
[01:14:27.120 --> 01:14:30.120]  Are you standing out at the airport or something?
[01:14:30.120 --> 01:14:33.120]  I am in a truck and I can't turn it off.
[01:14:33.120 --> 01:14:36.120]  If I turn it off, then I'm going to lose power and I won't be able to hear you.
[01:14:36.120 --> 01:14:37.120]  No, no, no.
[01:14:37.120 --> 01:14:38.120]  That's okay.
[01:14:38.120 --> 01:14:39.120]  Go ahead.
[01:14:39.120 --> 01:14:40.120]  Okay.
[01:14:40.120 --> 01:14:41.120]  Excellent.
[01:14:41.120 --> 01:14:56.120]  I had a question about the removal process and the removal process came up in I think it was US 2028 section 1446.
[01:14:56.120 --> 01:15:01.120]  When you say removal, are we talking about a case in a state court to a federal court?
[01:15:01.120 --> 01:15:02.120]  That's correct.
[01:15:02.120 --> 01:15:03.120]  Okay.
[01:15:03.120 --> 01:15:14.120]  Now I've already sent the notice of removal to the state court and I would like to know,
[01:15:14.120 --> 01:15:22.120]  am I supposed to also send a notice of removal to the federal eastern district as well?
[01:15:22.120 --> 01:15:23.120]  I don't know.
[01:15:23.120 --> 01:15:29.120]  What are the rules and say that you have to do for the purpose of removal?
[01:15:29.120 --> 01:15:36.120]  See, there are certain criteria that you have to meet before the request for removal would be valid to begin with,
[01:15:36.120 --> 01:15:45.120]  such as diversity, jurisdiction or federally protected rights issue that the state is not upholding.
[01:15:45.120 --> 01:15:49.120]  And then there's the process of how to do it.
[01:15:49.120 --> 01:15:57.120]  The process should tell you what has to be filed and who it has to be filed with and when.
[01:15:57.120 --> 01:15:58.120]  Exactly.
[01:15:58.120 --> 01:16:00.120]  So what did it tell you?
[01:16:00.120 --> 01:16:04.120]  Okay.
[01:16:04.120 --> 01:16:12.120]  I have to have it within 30 days of the citation or the complaint and I've done that by the hair of my chinny chin chin.
[01:16:12.120 --> 01:16:22.120]  I've done that to the state court, but I didn't have that to the federal court, which is the court that I'm trying to remove it to.
[01:16:22.120 --> 01:16:27.120]  But I did do it, but I just didn't have it within the 30 days.
[01:16:27.120 --> 01:16:35.120]  Well, again, the criteria for what you file in the state court may not be the same as what's required for the federal court.
[01:16:35.120 --> 01:16:40.120]  That same requirement may not even exist.
[01:16:40.120 --> 01:16:41.120]  Hang on.
[01:16:41.120 --> 01:16:43.120]  Hang on just a second and we'll finish this up on the other side.
[01:16:43.120 --> 01:16:44.120]  Okay.
[01:16:44.120 --> 01:16:46.120]  I got a break coming up here.
[01:16:46.120 --> 01:16:47.120]  All right, folks.
[01:16:47.120 --> 01:16:51.120]  This is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:51.120 --> 01:17:00.120]  We've got three segments left, so give us a call, get a line and we will be right back after this break.
[01:17:00.120 --> 01:17:01.120]  I love logos.
[01:17:01.120 --> 01:17:04.120]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:04.120 --> 01:17:07.120]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.120 --> 01:17:08.120]  I need my truth fix.
[01:17:08.120 --> 01:17:13.120]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.120 --> 01:17:20.120]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplement.
[01:17:20.120 --> 01:17:22.120]  How can I help logos?
[01:17:22.120 --> 01:17:24.120]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:24.120 --> 01:17:27.120]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:17:27.120 --> 01:17:31.120]  In order of your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.120 --> 01:17:35.120]  Now, go to LogosReguleNetwork.com.
[01:17:35.120 --> 01:17:38.120]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:38.120 --> 01:17:43.120]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.120 --> 01:17:44.120]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.120 --> 01:17:45.120]  No.
[01:17:45.120 --> 01:17:47.120]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.120 --> 01:17:48.120]  No.
[01:17:48.120 --> 01:17:49.120]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:17:49.120 --> 01:17:50.120]  No.
[01:17:50.120 --> 01:17:51.120]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.120 --> 01:17:52.120]  Wow.
[01:17:52.120 --> 01:17:54.120]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.120 --> 01:17:55.120]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.120 --> 01:17:57.120]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.120 --> 01:17:58.120]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.120 --> 01:18:00.120]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.120 --> 01:18:05.120]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.120 --> 01:18:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.120 --> 01:18:15.120]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:18:15.120 --> 01:18:21.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:18:21.120 --> 01:18:25.120]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:18:25.120 --> 01:18:27.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:18:27.120 --> 01:18:29.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:18:29.120 --> 01:18:34.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.120 --> 01:18:39.120]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.120 --> 01:18:41.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.120 --> 01:18:47.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner,
[01:18:47.120 --> 01:18:50.120]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.120 --> 01:18:57.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.120 --> 01:19:11.120]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:27.120 --> 01:19:46.120]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:46.120 --> 01:19:48.120]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:19:48.120 --> 01:19:50.120]  Okay, back to Charles and Georgia.
[01:19:50.120 --> 01:19:58.120]  Charles, while I was on the break here, I had a couple of the people listening to the show pop up some information for me.
[01:19:58.120 --> 01:20:04.120]  And what you could do at the federal court is you could file a, what's called a motion to file,
[01:20:04.120 --> 01:20:07.120]  or motion for leave to file out of time.
[01:20:07.120 --> 01:20:16.120]  Since your request to them was not timely, you need to get that done and then file the other one if it's approved.
[01:20:16.120 --> 01:20:19.120]  Okay, just to cover your bases and be sure.
[01:20:19.120 --> 01:20:23.120]  They may grant it anyway, but better safe than sorry.
[01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:31.120]  Okay, and the other thing was I wanted to know, since it's a state court here in Georgia,
[01:20:31.120 --> 01:20:38.120]  and I'm removing it to the Eastern District Court in Michigan, would that even be plausible?
[01:20:38.120 --> 01:20:39.120]  I think it should be the...
[01:20:39.120 --> 01:20:41.120]  Well, do you have a diversity jurisdiction issue?
[01:20:41.120 --> 01:20:44.120]  Are you from a different state than where it was issued?
[01:20:44.120 --> 01:20:45.120]  Yes.
[01:20:45.120 --> 01:20:48.120]  Okay, then it's a diversity jurisdiction issue.
[01:20:48.120 --> 01:20:57.120]  Excellent, and that's what I'll put in, because I've already sent the notice to the state court here in Georgia,
[01:20:57.120 --> 01:21:02.120]  but I didn't put a diversity citizenship issue.
[01:21:02.120 --> 01:21:08.120]  Yeah, you need to raise that issue because that's one thing that would invest the federal court with jurisdiction.
[01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:10.120]  Okay.
[01:21:10.120 --> 01:21:16.120]  Okay, so I'm going to, I probably have to amend that notice that I already sent to the state.
[01:21:16.120 --> 01:21:23.120]  You got to get the leave motion done first, because if they don't grant you leave to file out of time,
[01:21:23.120 --> 01:21:29.120]  then you're going to start the process again, and then you're going to go out of time on the state side.
[01:21:29.120 --> 01:21:31.120]  Gotcha.
[01:21:31.120 --> 01:21:34.120]  Okay, okay, got you.
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:36.120]  All right, I got you.
[01:21:36.120 --> 01:21:37.120]  Okay.
[01:21:37.120 --> 01:21:39.120]  So I'm going to get the work on that, and I'll call you back in a couple of weeks.
[01:21:39.120 --> 01:21:43.120]  Okay, good luck.
[01:21:43.120 --> 01:21:46.120]  All right, now where are we going to next?
[01:21:46.120 --> 01:21:48.120]  Oh yeah, let's see.
[01:21:48.120 --> 01:21:51.120]  We have, there we go.
[01:21:51.120 --> 01:21:53.120]  Now my thing's working.
[01:21:53.120 --> 01:21:54.120]  Ken in New York.
[01:21:54.120 --> 01:21:56.120]  Ken, what can we do for you?
[01:21:56.120 --> 01:22:00.120]  Thank you for taking my quality.
[01:22:00.120 --> 01:22:08.120]  Normally the kind of questions that I have usually I refer to that other guy at the end of the week.
[01:22:08.120 --> 01:22:10.120]  Randy?
[01:22:10.120 --> 01:22:11.120]  Yes.
[01:22:11.120 --> 01:22:12.120]  Okay.
[01:22:12.120 --> 01:22:15.120]  But you had said something years ago.
[01:22:15.120 --> 01:22:16.120]  I was thinking about it.
[01:22:16.120 --> 01:22:18.120]  And you just thought about it tonight?
[01:22:18.120 --> 01:22:19.120]  Okay.
[01:22:19.120 --> 01:22:22.120]  Yes, because it's traffic related.
[01:22:22.120 --> 01:22:29.120]  Well, I had just got my notice for renewal registration that comes in the email, and you just push a button,
[01:22:29.120 --> 01:22:35.120]  pay the money, and you don't give it any more thought.
[01:22:35.120 --> 01:22:40.120]  I have not had a car loan since 1990, so I owe my car outright.
[01:22:40.120 --> 01:22:46.120]  Is it true that when you, now I haven't seen an application for registration in years,
[01:22:46.120 --> 01:22:51.120]  but is it true that you're signing your property over to the state when you fill out a registration?
[01:22:51.120 --> 01:22:53.120]  No, it's not true.
[01:22:53.120 --> 01:22:54.120]  It's not true.
[01:22:54.120 --> 01:23:00.120]  Now what you have to realize about registration is what you're getting in return,
[01:23:00.120 --> 01:23:02.120]  not what you're doing up front.
[01:23:02.120 --> 01:23:07.120]  This comes down to the issue of what a certificate of title actually is.
[01:23:07.120 --> 01:23:11.120]  When you read the Business and Commerce Code here in Texas,
[01:23:11.120 --> 01:23:16.120]  it says specifically that a certificate of title is a negotiable instrument,
[01:23:16.120 --> 01:23:26.120]  a negotiable instrument that represents the existence of an outstanding commercial lien against the property because of a loan.
[01:23:26.120 --> 01:23:27.120]  Okay?
[01:23:27.120 --> 01:23:30.120]  That's what the certificate of title actually is.
[01:23:30.120 --> 01:23:34.120]  Evidence of a lien based upon a loan.
[01:23:34.120 --> 01:23:39.120]  Thus making the property collateral for that loan.
[01:23:39.120 --> 01:23:44.120]  This is where the state is able to get its fingers into the pie,
[01:23:44.120 --> 01:23:54.120]  because the state is duty bound to ensure that both parties are protected in relation to the terms of the agreement.
[01:23:54.120 --> 01:23:55.120]  Okay?
[01:23:55.120 --> 01:24:09.120]  So because there is a lien represented by the certificate of title and liens have to be filed with the state, guess what?
[01:24:09.120 --> 01:24:15.120]  The state doesn't own it, but the state hasn't say so about it.
[01:24:15.120 --> 01:24:24.120]  So how does this affect me if I don't have, if I own the car outright, which I do?
[01:24:24.120 --> 01:24:31.120]  Do you have it registered and the only proof that you own it is a certificate of title?
[01:24:31.120 --> 01:24:32.120]  Okay.
[01:24:32.120 --> 01:24:37.120]  I think the question, someone had asked you a question this again going back years ago,
[01:24:37.120 --> 01:24:50.120]  and I think you told them to write to either the Secretary of State, if I'm not mistaken, in a particular state.
[01:24:50.120 --> 01:25:03.120]  The first thing you do is get a certified copy of your certificate of title made so that you can send the original title that you have in your possession to the Secretary of State
[01:25:03.120 --> 01:25:16.120]  and ask the Secretary of State to determine whether or not there are any outstanding leads or other encumbrances against the property listed in that title.
[01:25:16.120 --> 01:25:35.120]  If there is not, then you wish for the Secretary of State to certify that the certificate of title no longer represents a valid lien or an outstanding loan or any other type of encumbrance against that property.
[01:25:35.120 --> 01:25:48.120]  Now, in some states, and I've heard it rumored from some people that should know, but I haven't actually ever seen one and they didn't show me one to prove it, and when I say should know it's because they own car dealerships,
[01:25:48.120 --> 01:26:02.120]  that the Secretary of State can give you a different kind of title in place of that certificate of title certifying that the property is completely unencumbered and owned by you.
[01:26:02.120 --> 01:26:17.120]  Another way to short circuit all of that was to get the certificate of title with a signed bill of sale stating that the car had been paid for in full and had no encumbrances attached to it.
[01:26:17.120 --> 01:26:23.120]  But if you didn't get that, then this is the only other process that remains.
[01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:39.120]  And I believe the lien that I have now, I don't have it in front of me, but the lien that I have when I bought this last car of mine, I think it says that I don't have any, there are no liens against the car.
[01:26:39.120 --> 01:26:58.120]  But again, regardless of what your agreement with the lender says, the certificate of title is something that stands apart and it represents a lien.
[01:26:58.120 --> 01:27:05.120]  And is that a lot of the state to somehow use it as any kind of a financial instrument?
[01:27:05.120 --> 01:27:09.120]  It is a negotiable instrument, just like a check.
[01:27:09.120 --> 01:27:18.120]  When, if you've turned around tomorrow and sold that car to someone else, what's the process for transferring your claim to the property to them?
[01:27:18.120 --> 01:27:24.120]  You endorse the certificate of title and you give it to them at the time of sale, correct?
[01:27:24.120 --> 01:27:25.120]  Right.
[01:27:25.120 --> 01:27:34.120]  Just like signing over a check to someone else to deposit in their bank account.
[01:27:34.120 --> 01:27:52.120]  And is it necessary that if the car, another thing that is apposalling to me is if the car is paid for in cash and there's no loan involved, why does every time you transfer it you can charge sales tax for it when I'm not a...
[01:27:52.120 --> 01:27:55.120]  Because you're registering it as a commercial use item.
[01:27:55.120 --> 01:27:58.120]  That's the other part of registration.
[01:27:58.120 --> 01:28:08.120]  What you're paying there are privilege taxes for using the roads as a place of business and that device for business purposes.
[01:28:08.120 --> 01:28:12.120]  So I am not in commerce.
[01:28:12.120 --> 01:28:14.120]  Then what?
[01:28:14.120 --> 01:28:16.120]  Is this something I can do about it?
[01:28:16.120 --> 01:28:19.120]  Well, that depends on how well you know the laws in New York.
[01:28:19.120 --> 01:28:27.120]  I know people in New York that have been fighting this for years and doing a pretty good job of it.
[01:28:27.120 --> 01:28:39.120]  I haven't talked to any of them in a very long time and don't know how to get in touch with them anymore, but I know they're there.
[01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:48.120]  So I could start by writing a letter to the Secretary of State and ask him what?
[01:28:48.120 --> 01:29:11.120]  You don't write a letter, you ask them to determine with a copy that original certificate of title that you have to check their records and see if they have 80 filed outstanding liens or encumbrances against the property that is listed in that certificate of title.
[01:29:11.120 --> 01:29:18.120]  And make sure that you ask them to send you back a certified response.
[01:29:18.120 --> 01:29:24.120]  And since I bought the car in cash, which I did, this is going back to 2008.
[01:29:24.120 --> 01:29:33.120]  Doesn't matter how you bought it, there could be a hidden encumbrance against it from the three people that owned it before you.
[01:29:33.120 --> 01:29:47.120]  That's what you're trying to get the Secretary of State to certify, that there is nothing against that piece of property and you are now the actual true legal rightful equity owner.
[01:29:47.120 --> 01:29:50.120]  Well, if there was with that...
[01:29:50.120 --> 01:29:53.120]  Hang on, Ken, I got to get a break going here.
[01:29:53.120 --> 01:29:55.120]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:55.120 --> 01:30:01.120]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:30:01.120 --> 01:30:06.120]  Potatoes are hot. Baked, french fried or mashed, we love our spuds.
[01:30:06.120 --> 01:30:09.120]  But pesticides in your potatoes aren't so hot.
[01:30:09.120 --> 01:30:35.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll give you some good reasons to buy organic.
[01:30:35.120 --> 01:30:41.120]  Like Big Brother's spine on you, start over with StartPage, great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:41.120 --> 01:30:44.120]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:44.120 --> 01:30:52.120]  The USDA says potatoes are among the five most contaminated vegetables in the store and they sure do soak up a lot of chemicals.
[01:30:52.120 --> 01:30:59.120]  First they're drenched in fungicide, planted in insecticide treated soil and then penetrated with systemic bug killers.
[01:30:59.120 --> 01:31:05.120]  Their vine is killed off with diesel fuel and herbicides before the potatoes are harvested.
[01:31:05.120 --> 01:31:11.120]  And finally they're sprayed with an anti-sprouting chemical that's toxic to the kidneys, spleen, liver and bones.
[01:31:11.120 --> 01:31:16.120]  Farm workers need protective clothing and a respirator to work the potato fields.
[01:31:16.120 --> 01:31:20.120]  But you shouldn't need all that just to pick up a fork. Choose organic.
[01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:28.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:28.120 --> 01:31:33.120]  I lost my son, my uncle, my uncle on September 11th, 2000.
[01:31:33.120 --> 01:31:37.120]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:37.120 --> 01:31:41.120]  World Trade Center 7, a 47 story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:41.120 --> 01:31:45.120]  Will the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:31:45.120 --> 01:31:51.120]  Over 1200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:51.120 --> 01:31:54.120]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:54.120 --> 01:31:59.120]  Go to buildingwatch.org. Why it fell, why it matters, is what you can do.
[01:31:59.120 --> 01:32:04.120]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:04.120 --> 01:32:09.120]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:09.120 --> 01:32:12.120]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:12.120 --> 01:32:19.120]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:19.120 --> 01:32:24.120]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:24.120 --> 01:32:30.120]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:30.120 --> 01:32:36.120]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:36.120 --> 01:32:43.120]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:43.120 --> 01:32:48.120]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:48.120 --> 01:32:55.120]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:55.120 --> 01:32:57.120]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:57.120 --> 01:32:59.120]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:32:59.120 --> 01:33:22.120]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:22.120 --> 01:33:30.120]  All right, folks, we are back. We're going to try to get this moving on a little bit quicker here because I got a full board.
[01:33:30.120 --> 01:33:32.120]  All right, Ken, what else you got?
[01:33:32.120 --> 01:33:40.120]  I'm just about done. Could I be opening up the can of worms by looking into this? I did buy it from the business.
[01:33:40.120 --> 01:33:46.120]  By looking into it? Probably not. By taking action on what you learn? Absolutely.
[01:33:46.120 --> 01:33:50.120]  Okay, I'll keep it in mind then. All right, thank you.
[01:33:50.120 --> 01:33:57.120]  I'm going to get a copy of the registration because I haven't seen one in a while, but I should be able to get a whole one.
[01:33:57.120 --> 01:33:59.120]  I'll read the whole thing for you.
[01:33:59.120 --> 01:34:04.120]  Okay, thanks for calling. All right, now we have a couple other first-time callers up here.
[01:34:04.120 --> 01:34:11.120]  We have Tracy in Tennessee. Tracy, what can we do for you?
[01:34:11.120 --> 01:34:15.120]  Hello, Tracy.
[01:34:15.120 --> 01:34:19.120]  If you got your phone on mute, there you go. All right.
[01:34:19.120 --> 01:34:26.120]  I was just going to get your opinion on stipulation.
[01:34:26.120 --> 01:34:36.120]  I think is that I would like to go and, you know, stipulate that I don't have a driver's license, insurance or license plate,
[01:34:36.120 --> 01:34:46.120]  and to move the court to prove, you know, beyond a reasonable doubt, the known legal duty of which was breached.
[01:34:46.120 --> 01:34:54.120]  I don't know what it's like in Texas, but in Mississippi and in Tennessee, it all goes back to privilege tax,
[01:34:54.120 --> 01:35:02.120]  which is full-profit activity in the public interest, which is converting a motor vehicle into an instrumentality of commerce.
[01:35:02.120 --> 01:35:03.120]  Right.
[01:35:03.120 --> 01:35:13.120]  So would it be damaging to stipulate that I didn't have a driver's license, insurance or license plate?
[01:35:13.120 --> 01:35:26.120]  Well, my thing is, is since the burden of proof is on them to everything that they're alleging, including how the statute applies,
[01:35:26.120 --> 01:35:34.120]  why would you assume that you need to do that? Why would you want to do that?
[01:35:34.120 --> 01:35:37.120]  Because I could avoid trial and I hate trial.
[01:35:37.120 --> 01:35:44.120]  I could avoid trial by stipulating that you're guilty of the very thing they're trying to say you're guilty of.
[01:35:44.120 --> 01:35:48.120]  Well, my, well, all right.
[01:35:48.120 --> 01:35:50.120]  And that's what a stipulation is.
[01:35:50.120 --> 01:35:51.120]  The fact is true.
[01:35:51.120 --> 01:35:53.120]  That's what you're stipulating.
[01:35:53.120 --> 01:35:57.120]  The fact that you're alleging is true.
[01:35:57.120 --> 01:36:05.120]  But is it trial to find and determine the facts and then apply the law to the facts?
[01:36:05.120 --> 01:36:16.120]  But the whole point of the motion that you wrote is to bring the facts that they're going to have to prove at trial into the open before trial arrives.
[01:36:16.120 --> 01:36:23.120]  And then you have the issue of, okay, look, you must prove I was engaged in an activity of commerce.
[01:36:23.120 --> 01:36:31.120]  I'm going to file discovery wanting your evidence that proves that, which you can do with a separate motion.
[01:36:31.120 --> 01:36:32.120]  Okay.
[01:36:32.120 --> 01:36:38.120]  But there's no rules for, there's no procedure for discovery.
[01:36:38.120 --> 01:36:40.120]  We were looking at pure bills of discovery.
[01:36:40.120 --> 01:36:43.120]  We don't know how to get discovery because the criminal rules don't apply.
[01:36:43.120 --> 01:36:50.120]  We don't really see exculpatory evidence or discovery or Brady material.
[01:36:50.120 --> 01:36:51.120]  Okay.
[01:36:51.120 --> 01:36:53.120]  We don't see how that we could actually...
[01:36:53.120 --> 01:36:56.120]  Is this a civil infraction in Mississippi?
[01:36:56.120 --> 01:36:57.120]  Nope.
[01:36:57.120 --> 01:36:59.120]  What is it?
[01:36:59.120 --> 01:37:00.120]  Criminal.
[01:37:00.120 --> 01:37:03.120]  And how are you saying the criminal rules don't apply?
[01:37:03.120 --> 01:37:14.120]  Because Mississippi Criminal Rules 3.1 specifically says Mississippi traffic tickets are governed by statute and not these rules.
[01:37:14.120 --> 01:37:15.120]  Okay.
[01:37:15.120 --> 01:37:18.120]  And by what statute?
[01:37:18.120 --> 01:37:22.120]  63, 21, 9 or 921.
[01:37:22.120 --> 01:37:23.120]  Yeah, but hold on now.
[01:37:23.120 --> 01:37:24.120]  We're talking two different things here.
[01:37:24.120 --> 01:37:32.120]  We're not talking about the statutes relating to the rules themselves governing commercial use of the roads.
[01:37:32.120 --> 01:37:41.120]  The rules that it has to be referring to are the rules governing the procedure for trying a case associated with the violation of those rules.
[01:37:41.120 --> 01:37:42.120]  So where is that?
[01:37:42.120 --> 01:37:55.120]  In the criminal rules it quoted 63, 921 or 63, 21, 9 which is the uniform traffic ticket law which says that these traffic tickets shall constitute a complaint.
[01:37:55.120 --> 01:38:01.120]  If they want to call it criminal then it needs to meet the elements of a criminal complaint, correct?
[01:38:01.120 --> 01:38:03.120]  Yeah.
[01:38:03.120 --> 01:38:12.120]  So, you know, I have tons of cases on what a criminal complaint shall constitute and they don't do that and there's a appellate court.
[01:38:12.120 --> 01:38:18.120]  The appellate court says that, you know, these traffic tickets do constitute a complaint but it says it shall constitute a complaint.
[01:38:18.120 --> 01:38:20.120]  But anyways, I don't want to get into that.
[01:38:20.120 --> 01:38:26.120]  What I'm saying is that there's no discovery rules in the statute.
[01:38:26.120 --> 01:38:32.120]  I mean, there's nothing in the statute in regard to challenging and assuming a traffic ticket.
[01:38:32.120 --> 01:38:35.120]  File it anyway.
[01:38:35.120 --> 01:38:37.120]  Okay.
[01:38:37.120 --> 01:38:40.120]  File a Brady motion for discovery.
[01:38:40.120 --> 01:38:45.120]  Let Mississippi tell you that we don't have to give you discovery in a criminal case.
[01:38:45.120 --> 01:38:51.120]  Then you take it up the line and see if the federal courts and the Supreme Court agree with them.
[01:38:51.120 --> 01:38:59.120]  Okay, so I've already filed a Brady motion and I keep going back and forth because Brady motions are for exculpatory which is...
[01:38:59.120 --> 01:39:07.120]  It's not just exculpatory. Brady motion is everything in the kitchen sink.
[01:39:07.120 --> 01:39:14.120]  The Brady motion is meant to encompass anything in their possession and especially if it's exculpatory.
[01:39:14.120 --> 01:39:22.120]  But it's to say, look, whether you think it's exculpatory or not exculpatory, if you've got it, I want it.
[01:39:22.120 --> 01:39:25.120]  So what do they have that we want?
[01:39:25.120 --> 01:39:29.120]  That's the whole point. If they produce nothing, they have nothing.
[01:39:29.120 --> 01:39:33.120]  So what are they going to present at trial to say they're right?
[01:39:33.120 --> 01:39:36.120]  Well, I just want them to produce something here, you know.
[01:39:36.120 --> 01:39:45.120]  Well, but that's the point. They can't produce anything because you're given on the law that says they have to produce proof that you were acting commercially.
[01:39:45.120 --> 01:40:00.120]  So if you ask for things dealing with proof that you were engaging in a commercial use of the road, that can constitute things such as a commercial logbook, a bill of lading, a passenger manifest, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:40:00.120 --> 01:40:07.120]  Those things are physical records they would have to produce and which you would be entitled to through discovery.
[01:40:07.120 --> 01:40:21.120]  If they have none of those, then what articulable facts can an officer honestly testify to to say he had reason to believe you were and be proven right?
[01:40:21.120 --> 01:40:32.120]  That's what I'm saying. Just because they can't produce something doesn't mean that that doesn't work for you.
[01:40:32.120 --> 01:40:42.120]  If the burden of proof is on the state, then make them prove it. Every single element.
[01:40:42.120 --> 01:40:54.120]  All right. All right. All right. Well, the only other thing is, you know, in Mississippi, I don't know about other states, but insurance is mandatory.
[01:40:54.120 --> 01:40:57.120]  I'm sure an authorship state's insurance is mandatory.
[01:40:57.120 --> 01:41:03.120]  No, I'm going to guarantee you that insurance is mandatory for motor vehicles, right?
[01:41:03.120 --> 01:41:09.120]  Right, but it's under the automobile insurance.
[01:41:09.120 --> 01:41:12.120]  Irrelevant. That's not the controlling law.
[01:41:12.120 --> 01:41:16.120]  I understand. No, I, well, okay. All right.
[01:41:16.120 --> 01:41:22.120]  So I have an insurance, no insurance ticket. I'm sure anybody who doesn't have insurance has one.
[01:41:22.120 --> 01:41:29.120]  But anyway, so I don't know if you read that motion and I don't know.
[01:41:29.120 --> 01:41:38.120]  I'm still reading it. I was actually surprised by how much of the stuff that's in this one is stuff that I've been putting into the one I've been working on.
[01:41:38.120 --> 01:41:43.120]  It's kind of like almost feel like my computer got hacked.
[01:41:43.120 --> 01:41:47.120]  I didn't hack you, I promise.
[01:41:47.120 --> 01:41:58.120]  But so what are your thoughts on insurance companies not being mandated to provide insurance and were mandated to have insurance?
[01:41:58.120 --> 01:42:06.120]  You made this argument in your motion. The state cannot compel fraud or commerce.
[01:42:06.120 --> 01:42:19.120]  Insurance is a contractual agreement. The state cannot compel an individual in their private capacity to engage in an agreement.
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:24.120]  Can't do it.
[01:42:24.120 --> 01:42:28.120]  You made that argument already. You were 100% correct. What's the problem?
[01:42:28.120 --> 01:42:36.120]  All right. Well, I need to re-read it because I was just jotting stuff down and I wasn't a hurry. But all right, I'm just nervous.
[01:42:36.120 --> 01:42:38.120]  Cordade's coming up.
[01:42:38.120 --> 01:42:49.120]  I know, but you've got everything in there. From what I've read so far, you have nailed every statute and the requirements that the statute sets forth, everything in it says commercial.
[01:42:49.120 --> 01:43:02.120]  So what you need to do is sit down and make a list of every element that not only must they allege, they must prove. And if they miss even one, they didn't prove the charge.
[01:43:02.120 --> 01:43:06.120]  And the case has to be dismissed.
[01:43:06.120 --> 01:43:14.120]  So if commerce is a requisite element, it must be asserted in the complaint, it must be proven at trial.
[01:43:14.120 --> 01:43:32.120]  If the commerce is not asserted on that traffic citation, they're done because they did not cite a necessary element of the allegation, nor did they prove it at trial.
[01:43:32.120 --> 01:43:34.120]  Can you follow?
[01:43:34.120 --> 01:43:37.120]  Yes, I do. All right. I'll let you go.
[01:43:37.120 --> 01:43:39.120]  All right. Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:43:39.120 --> 01:43:40.120]  All right. You're welcome.
[01:43:40.120 --> 01:43:41.120]  Thank you.
[01:43:41.120 --> 01:43:43.120]  You're welcome. Bye-bye.
[01:43:43.120 --> 01:43:51.120]  Folks, we are about to enter into the last segment. I still got lots of callers on the board. I will try to get there by as quick as I can, but I cannot make any promises.
[01:43:51.120 --> 01:44:20.120]  So y'all hang in there and we'll be right back after this break.
[01:44:22.120 --> 01:44:27.120]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.120 --> 01:44:30.120]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.120 --> 01:44:39.120]  hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best-gapped health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.120 --> 01:44:48.120]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.120 --> 01:45:00.120]  Call 888-910-4367 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempusa.org.
[01:45:18.120 --> 01:45:24.120]  What your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.120 --> 01:45:29.120]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.120 --> 01:45:35.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.120 --> 01:45:44.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.120 --> 01:45:53.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.120 --> 01:46:22.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.120 --> 01:46:31.120]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. We are now running into our last segment here, and we have Robby in Texas.
[01:46:31.120 --> 01:46:33.120]  Robby, what can we do for you?
[01:46:33.120 --> 01:46:37.120]  Hi, yeah, I just discovered you, so I'm new to all of this.
[01:46:37.120 --> 01:46:41.120]  Goodie, I'm like a new element here. I'm discovered. Alright.
[01:46:41.120 --> 01:46:47.120]  Yeah, you're awesome. I'm so excited to find you. I'm dealing with the Lesbian County Corrupt Police.
[01:46:47.120 --> 01:46:53.120]  Oh, I know who they are. Yeah, the Lesbian County guys.
[01:46:53.120 --> 01:47:07.120]  They harassed us for about six years, and recently my boyfriend got a few charges, went to court, and all of the things don't go so well with that, with the public defender and all of those things.
[01:47:07.120 --> 01:47:18.120]  So I want to kind of ask about that too, but my main thing is I was just indicted for evading arrest in a motor vehicle, driving two blocks home.
[01:47:18.120 --> 01:47:24.120]  You know, Dustin Simmons is messing with me, but I don't know how to fight it. I don't know what I need to do first.
[01:47:24.120 --> 01:47:30.120]  Well, I actually helped someone beat that exact charge here in Texas.
[01:47:30.120 --> 01:47:32.120]  Awesome.
[01:47:32.120 --> 01:47:44.120]  So go to my legal blog. It is located at Tau of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W, dot wordpress.com.
[01:47:44.120 --> 01:47:45.120]  Okay.
[01:47:45.120 --> 01:47:54.120]  And let me see if I can find which article it is here real quick. I've got so much stuff open here.
[01:47:54.120 --> 01:48:06.120]  You'll recognize it. It's got a lot of motions embedded in the page that you can actually read right there, but let me get to it here real quick and see if I can tell you exactly what the article is.
[01:48:06.120 --> 01:48:16.120]  Oh yeah, it's the one with Scalia on the front in the picture, and it says, a few bad apples.
[01:48:16.120 --> 01:48:18.120]  Okay. Okay, good.
[01:48:18.120 --> 01:48:24.120]  Okay, so just do a search for a few bad apples in the search field there, and it'll take you right to that article.
[01:48:24.120 --> 01:48:40.120]  Okay. And if I want to go ahead and just fight up against these guys big, since my boyfriend is on deferred adjudication with these charges, can we fight that again and get that?
[01:48:40.120 --> 01:48:51.120]  Well, subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time. A conviction that you can't beat on lack of subject matter jurisdiction is another issue.
[01:48:51.120 --> 01:48:59.120]  But if you can show that subject matter jurisdiction never was properly invoked or had, then absolutely you can fight it.
[01:48:59.120 --> 01:49:09.120]  If you can show that there was a violation of due process that deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction, or at least personal jurisdiction, you can fight it.
[01:49:09.120 --> 01:49:18.120]  Okay. Okay. I'm going to go ahead and read that first because I'm so new to this, and then I'm going to call again.
[01:49:18.120 --> 01:49:25.120]  Okay, well, it's a pretty good size motion. It's 30-something pages, but I did not leave any stone unturned in it when I did it.
[01:49:25.120 --> 01:49:31.120]  I'm so grateful for you. You've just been such a sunshine in my world. The point I was getting scared.
[01:49:31.120 --> 01:49:36.120]  You was in a pretty small, boring world in a fascination. But thank you nonetheless.
[01:49:36.120 --> 01:49:41.120]  No, we've been harassed for so long from these guys. I need to figure out what to do.
[01:49:41.120 --> 01:49:50.120]  Well, it's Gillespie County, so we already know that they're too dumb to know the law. They're the ones that got the precedent-setting case of Gillespie v. Rothgeary.
[01:49:50.120 --> 01:49:56.120]  Gillespie County, sorry. Yeah, where he sat in jail, I know. I know I read all about that, too.
[01:49:56.120 --> 01:50:02.120]  Well, my portion was sitting in jail 30 days for a letter mailed to the wrong address.
[01:50:02.120 --> 01:50:05.120]  Yeah. Yeah.
[01:50:05.120 --> 01:50:17.120]  Well, not to mention, there was the one here in 2015 where they forced these people to let them search their house for their son and a woman without a search warrant
[01:50:17.120 --> 01:50:21.120]  and arrested the husband for refusing to let them do it.
[01:50:21.120 --> 01:50:28.120]  Yeah. And somebody that was at Jax, they just won a case against Gillespie, too. A couple, I think.
[01:50:28.120 --> 01:50:34.120]  I think a court could win a case against Gillespie County because they're that stupid.
[01:50:34.120 --> 01:50:40.120]  God, they're so bad. They're so bad. Dustin Simmons, I think, is the worst around here.
[01:50:40.120 --> 01:50:51.120]  I think I even have records of his phone. I think I've got a lot against him so that I videoed the whole incident when he arrested Chad in a different county on a traffic violation,
[01:50:51.120 --> 01:50:58.120]  took him into the Sally Port, and then claims that he had drugs, and then he got a tampering. And so, and he didn't.
[01:50:58.120 --> 01:51:06.120]  And he should, I don't even think he should have been arrested in that county. So, I don't know. It's just, it's bad.
[01:51:06.120 --> 01:51:14.120]  OK. Well, I wish you luck with it. But, yeah, read up on that, and it should give you at least something to go look at.
[01:51:14.120 --> 01:51:20.120]  OK. Thanks so much. I'll be in touch. Yes, ma'am. OK. Bye. All right. Bye-bye.
[01:51:20.120 --> 01:51:26.120]  All right. Now we have Gary in Kansas. Gary, what can we do for you? Hey, what's up?
[01:51:26.120 --> 01:51:32.120]  Well, my blood pressure at the moment, but that's another story. Pick your phone.
[01:51:32.120 --> 01:51:44.120]  Oh, OK. So, what you got? Yeah, I was arrested for failure to appear, and I never received any summons or notice.
[01:51:44.120 --> 01:51:50.120]  OK. It wasn't sent through certified mail or it wasn't hand delivered. OK.
[01:51:50.120 --> 01:52:01.120]  Does state law require that to be done, or state law say that they can send it through the U.S. Postal Service but they're not required to show proof of receipt?
[01:52:01.120 --> 01:52:06.120]  I don't have any. I can't receive mail through the United States.
[01:52:06.120 --> 01:52:13.120]  Well, that's not my question. I'm asking you what the state law is on how notice is to be provided.
[01:52:13.120 --> 01:52:21.120]  I don't know. OK. Then the things you're citing, you're just citing off the top of your head about hand delivery or any of this other stuff.
[01:52:21.120 --> 01:52:29.120]  The question here is, is did you go and find out where the court said they mailed it?
[01:52:29.120 --> 01:52:31.120]  OK. So, you need to do that.
[01:52:31.120 --> 01:52:33.120]  It just happened like three days ago.
[01:52:33.120 --> 01:52:40.120]  OK. Still, something to be considered. You still need to go find out where the court is claiming they mailed the notice.
[01:52:40.120 --> 01:52:46.120]  Now, here is the trick they like to play. Here in Texas, they do this all the time.
[01:52:46.120 --> 01:52:56.120]  They will look up your driving record and find out some of your previous addresses that they know damn good and well you're no longer located at.
[01:52:56.120 --> 01:53:03.120]  And they will intentionally send the notice to the wrong address. OK.
[01:53:03.120 --> 01:53:08.120]  Well, the cops knew my address because I would not listen to what I'm saying.
[01:53:08.120 --> 01:53:12.120]  I didn't say they didn't know where you lived in real life.
[01:53:12.120 --> 01:53:22.120]  I said when it comes to giving you the notice that they're supposed to give you, they intentionally send it to an old address.
[01:53:22.120 --> 01:53:34.120]  That way, see, they can get you to agree that you were there even if you're not there now, which lets them off the hook because they said this was our last known good address.
[01:53:34.120 --> 01:53:47.120]  So, the other thing you need to be looking at is not only where they sent it, but any other information they have in relation to you that would prove that they knew the address they sent it to was wrong.
[01:53:47.120 --> 01:53:59.120]  Now, if they sent it to the address you're actually at and you still didn't get it, then you can demand that they show proof that it was received.
[01:53:59.120 --> 01:54:07.120]  They'll say that we don't have to because the statutes don't require us to. That's a due process violation.
[01:54:07.120 --> 01:54:18.120]  They cannot find you guilty of not doing something for which notice was required without first proving that notice was given.
[01:54:18.120 --> 01:54:20.120]  Okay.
[01:54:20.120 --> 01:54:21.120]  Okay.
[01:54:21.120 --> 01:54:27.120]  I never received a notice of a peer. Notice to a peer in court. I never received nothing.
[01:54:27.120 --> 01:54:38.120]  I'm not saying that you're lying about that. I'm simply trying to tell you some of the ways that they try to cover their butt and what kind of tricks they use to do it.
[01:54:38.120 --> 01:54:40.120]  Okay.
[01:54:40.120 --> 01:54:49.120]  This is, and the other thing I'm then trying to do is tell you how to expose what they're doing.
[01:54:49.120 --> 01:54:52.120]  There's a proof of burden on them.
[01:54:52.120 --> 01:54:58.120]  If the statute relieved them of it, once you challenge it, it goes to them. Yeah.
[01:54:58.120 --> 01:55:04.120]  When you say, look, you're lying. You never mailed it. You have no proof I ever received it.
[01:55:04.120 --> 01:55:09.120]  How can you show proof that you mailed it if neither one of us have it?
[01:55:09.120 --> 01:55:14.120]  That's a fact.
[01:55:14.120 --> 01:55:16.120]  Okay. So there you go.
[01:55:16.120 --> 01:55:19.120]  I never received any notice to a peer. Never, ever.
[01:55:19.120 --> 01:55:21.120]  Okay. We have established that.
[01:55:21.120 --> 01:55:30.120]  I'm trying to tell you how to argue that they do have to prove it regardless of what the statute says.
[01:55:30.120 --> 01:55:35.120]  Okay. They can't prove it.
[01:55:35.120 --> 01:55:36.120]  What?
[01:55:36.120 --> 01:55:39.120]  It was not hand delivered. It was not served.
[01:55:39.120 --> 01:55:51.120]  Again, you don't know what the delivery requirements are, so sitting here saying what they didn't do isn't going to help you until you find out that they had to do it.
[01:55:51.120 --> 01:56:01.120]  You've got to look at the law to see what the law says is required in the form of notice. How are they required to serve you?
[01:56:01.120 --> 01:56:02.120]  I would think...
[01:56:02.120 --> 01:56:03.120]  Don't think.
[01:56:03.120 --> 01:56:07.120]  Go read.
[01:56:07.120 --> 01:56:09.120]  Read a code?
[01:56:09.120 --> 01:56:11.120]  Yeah.
[01:56:11.120 --> 01:56:19.120]  Read the rules of procedure. What constitutes proper service?
[01:56:19.120 --> 01:56:21.120]  I have no idea.
[01:56:21.120 --> 01:56:31.120]  Hence the reason you read.
[01:56:31.120 --> 01:56:41.120]  I would have never served a notice to a peer.
[01:56:41.120 --> 01:56:44.120]  Okay. Again, point established.
[01:56:44.120 --> 01:56:48.120]  Not relevant at this point any longer that you didn't get it.
[01:56:48.120 --> 01:56:53.120]  Now we need to figure out how to do something about it.
[01:56:53.120 --> 01:56:54.120]  Right?
[01:56:54.120 --> 01:56:57.120]  That's what you're calling for.
[01:56:57.120 --> 01:57:02.120]  Or am I wrong?
[01:57:02.120 --> 01:57:09.120]  I was a jail for a penalty to a peer, and I never received a summons to a peer.
[01:57:09.120 --> 01:57:13.120]  You ever seen that movie Cool Hand Luke with Paul Newman?
[01:57:13.120 --> 01:57:14.120]  No.
[01:57:14.120 --> 01:57:15.120]  No?
[01:57:15.120 --> 01:57:16.120]  Yeah, probably years ago.
[01:57:16.120 --> 01:57:17.120]  Yeah.
[01:57:17.120 --> 01:57:25.120]  He's a prisoner in this old fashioned southern type prison where they put you on chain gangs on the road, but he's also in the Toria's escape artist.
[01:57:25.120 --> 01:57:29.120]  He tries to run away every chance he gets.
[01:57:29.120 --> 01:57:34.120]  And the last prison that he's in, he tries to run.
[01:57:34.120 --> 01:57:39.120]  They catch him and bring him back, throw him down in front of the other prisoners in an warden standing up on the hill.
[01:57:39.120 --> 01:57:47.120]  And the first thing that the warden says when he hits the ground is what we have here is a failure to communicate.
[01:57:47.120 --> 01:57:49.120]  To communicate.
[01:57:49.120 --> 01:57:50.120]  Okay?
[01:57:50.120 --> 01:58:02.120]  So what I'm telling you right now is I'm telling you how to try to help yourself prove that you didn't get noticed by forcing them to prove they sent it.
[01:58:02.120 --> 01:58:07.120]  And the only way they can do that is to prove that you got it.
[01:58:07.120 --> 01:58:08.120]  I agree.
[01:58:08.120 --> 01:58:14.120]  So read the statutes that govern proper service.
[01:58:14.120 --> 01:58:19.120]  Because that's the only thing that's going to tell you what they have to do and how they have to do it.
[01:58:19.120 --> 01:58:20.120]  Don't assume.
[01:58:20.120 --> 01:58:21.120]  Don't guess.
[01:58:21.120 --> 01:58:22.120]  Don't think.
[01:58:22.120 --> 01:58:23.120]  Don't believe.
[01:58:23.120 --> 01:58:24.120]  Read.
[01:58:24.120 --> 01:58:25.120]  Okay?
[01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:27.120]  So is.
[01:58:27.120 --> 01:58:28.120]  There's no so, man.
[01:58:28.120 --> 01:58:29.120]  I'm out of time.
[01:58:29.120 --> 01:58:30.120]  That's all there is to it.
[01:58:30.120 --> 01:58:33.120]  Do that or you're gonna get nowhere.
[01:58:33.120 --> 01:58:34.120]  All right, folks.
[01:58:34.120 --> 01:58:37.120]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:37.120 --> 01:58:40.120]  I appreciate all the callers and all the listeners.
[01:58:40.120 --> 01:58:41.120]  Y'all take care.
[01:58:41.120 --> 01:58:42.120]  Have a great week.
[01:58:42.120 --> 01:58:49.120]  Good night and God bless.
[01:59:12.120 --> 01:59:19.120]  God bless.
[01:59:42.120 --> 01:59:56.120]  Thank you.