[00:00.000 --> 00:08.600] The following news flash was brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns. [00:08.600 --> 00:17.080] Markets for Wednesday, 7 March 2018 are trading with gold at $1,327.21 an ounce, silver $16.49 [00:17.080 --> 00:28.240] an ounce, Texas Crude $62.60 a barrel, bitcoins at $9,883.87, Ethereum $748.18, Bitcoin Cash [00:28.240 --> 00:35.240] $1,086.63, and filing litecoins at $181.10 a crypto coin. [00:35.240 --> 00:45.720] Today in History, the year 1989, Iran and the United Kingdom break diplomatic relations [00:45.720 --> 00:55.080] after a fight over Simon Rushdie's controversial novel, The Cetanic Versus, Today in History. [00:55.080 --> 01:00.280] In recent news, President Trump's top economic advisor, Gary D. Cohn, stated yesterday Tuesday [01:00.280 --> 01:04.800] that he was indeed resigning after giving a heads up last week that he was considering [01:04.800 --> 01:10.000] doing so if President Trump decided to follow through with his tariffs on imported aluminum [01:10.000 --> 01:11.000] and steel. [01:11.000 --> 01:14.600] Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed levy tariffs [01:14.600 --> 01:19.400] on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure seems obvious for [01:19.400 --> 01:27.920] many, considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents of any such measures in the administration. [01:27.920 --> 01:32.720] According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jants out of the University [01:32.720 --> 01:37.320] of Tennessee believes he may have found the skeletal remains of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific [01:37.320 --> 01:38.320] island. [01:38.320 --> 01:43.360] Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator Fred Newman were never to be [01:43.360 --> 01:44.360] found. [01:44.360 --> 01:48.840] At least until now, Richard Jants stated that what I can say scientifically is that they, [01:48.840 --> 01:53.200] the recent Pacific island remains, are 99% likely to be hers. [01:53.200 --> 01:56.640] Interesting timing for this finding to be released, considering that the 1932 Hudson [01:56.640 --> 02:01.760] Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, was reportedly stolen on Friday, February [02:01.760 --> 02:08.080] 23rd, 2018, only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood [02:08.080 --> 02:13.600] in L.A. [02:13.600 --> 02:17.680] The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, with the top ten currencies suffering 5 to [02:17.680 --> 02:19.120] 10% losses. [02:19.120 --> 02:22.000] This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would [02:22.000 --> 02:26.080] be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them. [02:26.080 --> 02:30.280] According to the SEC statement, quote, if a platform offers trading of digital assets [02:30.280 --> 02:35.120] that are securities and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws, [02:35.120 --> 02:40.520] then the platform must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or be exempt [02:40.520 --> 02:41.520] from registration. [02:41.520 --> 02:47.880] The low-star low-down is looking for sponsors, you have a product or a service you like to [02:47.880 --> 02:54.680] advertise with us, feel free to give me, call it 210-363-2257, this was Rick Rody with your [02:54.680 --> 03:22.720] low-down for March 7th, 2018. [04:54.680 --> 05:05.840] Hey, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton with our radio on this Friday, the 30th day of March, 2018. [05:05.840 --> 05:11.200] We are a third of the way through another year already. [05:11.200 --> 05:21.640] We have the phone lines open, we will have them open all night, our call-in number, 512-646-1984, [05:21.640 --> 05:28.280] and a little update on the traffic issue, the traffic site. [05:28.280 --> 05:32.800] My programmer has been out of commission for a couple of weeks, but we're about to get [05:32.800 --> 05:34.800] him back. [05:34.800 --> 05:40.600] And by Monday or Tuesday, probably by Monday, if I can get a hold of my programmer, I've [05:40.600 --> 05:47.800] got a minor adjustment to make on the traffic site and I can bring it back up and load up [05:47.800 --> 05:51.440] all of my new documents to it. [05:51.440 --> 06:00.920] And I have a number of questionnaires mostly completed, and I have one minor little programming [06:00.920 --> 06:08.600] issue with the questionnaires, and we should have both of those issues fixed Monday. [06:08.600 --> 06:14.480] And we'll have it up where you can not only go in and put your ticket information in like [06:14.480 --> 06:21.440] we could before, but then after you appear the first time, you come back, go back on [06:21.440 --> 06:26.760] the website, and fill out this questionnaire. [06:26.760 --> 06:30.920] And the questionnaire will take you through what happened the first time you showed up [06:30.920 --> 06:33.880] at court. [06:33.880 --> 06:42.040] Now it should start getting interesting because I will have a statement of facts, but in a [06:42.040 --> 06:47.080] week or so, I'm at the point of building documentation. [06:47.080 --> 06:52.120] I have a set of questions, and I'll go down the questions. [06:52.120 --> 06:59.880] And there are points in the questionnaire where you get to an answer that when you give [06:59.880 --> 07:07.520] the answer, the answer implicates emotion, pleading, criminal complaint, professional [07:07.520 --> 07:14.800] conduct complaint, bar grievance, judicial conduct complaint, a whole myriad of stuff [07:14.800 --> 07:21.720] that it can't, that any one answer can indicate, and I'll go in and lay in codes in all of [07:21.720 --> 07:22.720] those places. [07:22.720 --> 07:25.400] That's the part I'm having to do now. [07:25.400 --> 07:31.240] We had to rewrite all of our questionnaires to change the coding structure because of [07:31.240 --> 07:42.320] a programming issue, and that's held us back for about two or three weeks, recoding everything. [07:42.320 --> 07:48.480] And once all of it's recoded and I have it producing an output statement, then I will [07:48.480 --> 07:53.960] go in and lay in the codes to call up all of these documents, and then I start creating [07:53.960 --> 07:54.960] the documents. [07:54.960 --> 07:59.640] And when it calls the documents, it'll go to the database, pull all your information, [07:59.640 --> 08:05.800] fill in, and literally create the entire document on the fly. [08:05.800 --> 08:13.760] So I'm hoping that by the end of the week, I'll have all of these processes working, [08:13.760 --> 08:17.800] then I'll start filling in the documentation. [08:17.800 --> 08:23.800] And that's when I'll go ahead and launch the traffic site. [08:23.800 --> 08:29.760] Once we launch it and start pouring these documents in, these guys are not going to [08:29.760 --> 08:32.840] believe what happens to them. [08:32.840 --> 08:38.400] As I go through this, I am amazed myself, even though I've been doing this all this [08:38.400 --> 08:45.920] time, I'm still amazed at how many different motions, pleadings, criminal complaints, [08:45.920 --> 08:55.240] war grievances, judicial conduct complaints, all of these documents we can flood these [08:55.240 --> 08:56.240] guys with. [08:56.240 --> 09:02.160] And you have these guys trying to use traffic to make money with. [09:02.160 --> 09:07.600] And they've got a lawyer there who's acting as a municipal judge. [09:07.600 --> 09:13.200] So they're going to make $200, maybe $200 an hour, but that's okay because they produce [09:13.200 --> 09:14.200] a lot of income. [09:14.200 --> 09:19.280] And then they've got a prosecutor there, and he's going to make probably $100, $150 [09:19.280 --> 09:21.400] an hour. [09:21.400 --> 09:26.960] And then they've got a bailiff, or a bailiff or two, and a clerk, and they've got quite [09:26.960 --> 09:30.920] a bit of outgo. [09:30.920 --> 09:38.440] And then we come in and we drop a stack of motions and pleadings on them. [09:38.440 --> 09:41.480] And then they do what they always do. [09:41.480 --> 09:47.360] They call you in so that you can meet with the prosecutor and he can play, let's make [09:47.360 --> 09:48.360] a deal. [09:48.360 --> 09:56.280] Well, when they do that, it doesn't make any difference what you do at the hearing. [09:56.280 --> 10:02.480] When you're done, you go online, fill out the questionnaire, you'll file impersonating [10:02.480 --> 10:08.960] a public official against the prosecutor, a securing and executing document by deception [10:08.960 --> 10:15.400] against the prosecutor, the clerk, and the judge, impersonating a public official against [10:15.400 --> 10:23.720] the prosecutor, bargaining against the prosecutor to just a conduct complaint against the judge. [10:23.720 --> 10:28.000] Just for that hearing, and there's probably a couple of more that I've skipped over, plus [10:28.000 --> 10:34.320] a motion to dismiss, and then I say criminal complaints, yeah, criminal complaints against [10:34.320 --> 10:35.320] all of them. [10:35.320 --> 10:37.560] That's just for one hearing. [10:37.560 --> 10:43.320] They get flooded with these documents, then they call you in the next time and do the [10:43.320 --> 10:46.160] same thing. [10:46.160 --> 10:54.680] And one thing that we're doing that is somewhat different is we are filing criminal affidavits [10:54.680 --> 11:03.920] against the judge when the judge fails to properly apply the law to the facts. [11:03.920 --> 11:07.800] We just did that with Tim's case in the county I live in. [11:07.800 --> 11:17.080] The next time you went into court, the judge was agreeable, I guess is the best term to [11:17.080 --> 11:18.080] say. [11:18.080 --> 11:24.480] He asked Tim for a statement, and Tim started telling him all the stuff that was going on, [11:24.480 --> 11:30.440] and the prosecutor objected, I mean, the opposing counsel objected as irrelevant. [11:30.440 --> 11:35.880] And the judge said, that's okay, I'm going to let him speak, and he got to go through [11:35.880 --> 11:38.560] all the garbage that's going on. [11:38.560 --> 11:46.280] But I suspect he let him speak because he found out that Tim had already filed criminal [11:46.280 --> 11:50.320] charges against him. [11:50.320 --> 11:55.240] What he gets for not doing this job, and they're not used to you filing criminal charges against [11:55.240 --> 12:04.960] them when they rule improperly, they're used to ruling improperly at their caprice with [12:04.960 --> 12:09.080] no possibility of ramifications. [12:09.080 --> 12:16.200] Well, we want to start visiting ramifications on them. [12:16.200 --> 12:21.680] When we start doing that, we will very quickly get everybody's attention. [12:21.680 --> 12:28.200] Now, I don't have any calls yet, we do have the call boards open, we'll keep them open [12:28.200 --> 12:32.120] all night. [12:32.120 --> 12:44.920] Before this, I was beginning to go through the e-book, and last week I went through [12:44.920 --> 12:49.960] a section, I'm trying to get it open here, there's a section I've been wanting to go [12:49.960 --> 13:00.760] through, part because it's really good information, but also part because it's something I need [13:00.760 --> 13:04.080] to go through in time or two. [13:04.080 --> 13:09.960] When I go through this, it helps when you think you know something, and then you try [13:09.960 --> 13:13.640] to explain it to someone. [13:13.640 --> 13:17.760] You find out you may not know it as well as you thought you did. [13:17.760 --> 13:23.560] So I'd like to explain this on the air, this is, I think you'll find it good information. [13:23.560 --> 13:36.160] It is unusual in that when I talk about legal, about mental flow, that is something that [13:36.160 --> 13:41.400] actually developed myself, it's not something I got from somewhere else, and it really doesn't [13:41.400 --> 13:48.840] have much to do with the law, or it doesn't have so much to do with the law as it has [13:48.840 --> 14:00.680] to do with psychology, and primarily this came from researching all the popular psychologies [14:00.680 --> 14:06.800] years ago, after I came back from Vietnam, I did something that made me realize I was [14:06.800 --> 14:19.560] pretty crazy, and so I started going through all of the popular psychologies, and I was [14:19.560 --> 14:25.520] not pleased with what I found, for the most part the psychologies that I read were not [14:25.520 --> 14:35.720] actually what I would construe as psychologies, but more theologies, in that this was this [14:35.720 --> 14:44.840] guy's idea, was Freud's idea of how things worked, or Piaget, or Fritz Perles, or the [14:44.840 --> 14:52.040] whole raft of them, and they came up with these psychologies, but there was no underlying [14:52.040 --> 15:01.960] basis, and I'm trained as an engineer, and as an engineer, I start from one plus one [15:01.960 --> 15:11.080] is two, everything I do at engineering, everything in design, can all be traced back to one [15:11.080 --> 15:17.280] plus one is two, everything is built on that, all the science, all the physics is built [15:17.280 --> 15:28.000] on a very specific defined structure, I took some courses in psychology a few years back, [15:28.000 --> 15:32.600] and the professors are talking about these highly sophisticated psychological metaphors, [15:32.600 --> 15:38.920] and I asked the professor, I told him, you're going through all of these sophisticated metaphors, [15:38.920 --> 15:46.400] and this is a introductory class to psychology, apparently you are presupposing that I know [15:46.400 --> 15:52.320] a whole lot about psychology, and then he said, well, Mr. Kalkin, I've talked to you, [15:52.320 --> 16:00.040] you do know a lot about psychology, maybe I do, but I didn't pay for a course, a sophisticated [16:00.040 --> 16:08.920] course in psychology, I paid for psychology 101, the basics, what is the basic premise [16:08.920 --> 16:14.600] of the living mind on which you base all of these sophisticated psychological structures, [16:14.600 --> 16:20.800] and he didn't have one, he sent me to the behavioral science department, they didn't [16:20.800 --> 16:28.720] have one either, so I made up one, and we've come back on the other side, I'll talk about [16:28.720 --> 16:35.680] it a little bit, but it was that psychology that I put together from an engineering perspective [16:35.680 --> 16:39.800] that led me to this whole section on mental flow, and I'll explain that when we come back, [16:39.800 --> 16:51.640] Randy Kelsen, rule of law radio, our call in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back. [16:51.640 --> 17:21.480] Thank you for watching, and I'll see you in the next one. [17:51.640 --> 18:21.480] Thank you for watching, and I'll see you in the next one. [18:21.640 --> 18:51.480] Thank you for watching, and I'll see you in the next one. [18:51.640 --> 19:08.480] Thank you for watching, and I'll see you in the next one. [19:21.640 --> 19:44.480] Thank you for watching, and I'll see you in the next one. [19:44.480 --> 20:07.640] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelsen, rule of law radio, and we're talking about mental [20:07.640 --> 20:10.400] flow and how I got there. [20:10.400 --> 20:16.440] The way I got to mental flow was the first thing I did was build a mental model of the [20:16.440 --> 20:19.200] leading mind. [20:19.200 --> 20:28.520] I imagined that I was an alien zoologist sent to a backwater corner of the galaxy, and that's [20:28.520 --> 20:38.760] kind of hard because the galaxy is round, but just for metaphor's sake, to examine a creature [20:38.760 --> 20:42.200] almost sapient-sapient. [20:42.200 --> 20:43.600] Now all I could do was examine it. [20:43.600 --> 20:47.600] I couldn't interfere with it, I couldn't touch it, I couldn't dissect it, I couldn't [20:47.600 --> 20:48.600] interact with it. [20:48.600 --> 20:51.800] All I could do was watch. [20:51.800 --> 21:00.200] What can you tell about the human animal from observation? [21:00.200 --> 21:11.720] And it led to a set of parameters that we have aspects of mind, some that are conscious, [21:11.720 --> 21:17.000] we're consciously aware of, some we're not, some we are consciously aware of, we don't [21:17.000 --> 21:25.360] pay attention to, and we have internal, instinctual imperatives. [21:25.360 --> 21:31.960] If somebody throws a rock at your head, you'll duck, even if you're a baby. [21:31.960 --> 21:39.960] If a baby, they put them on a glass plate and put a table under half of it so they could [21:39.960 --> 21:47.880] climb over, crawl across the plate over the drop-off, and an infant that could just barely [21:47.880 --> 21:53.000] move would not cross the edge of that drop-off, they knew. [21:53.000 --> 22:03.000] They had birds that had always been in Japan and there was a certain hawk that preyed on [22:03.000 --> 22:05.520] these birds. [22:05.520 --> 22:12.560] They took a bunch of the birds to one of the outlying islands that didn't have these hawks [22:12.560 --> 22:18.240] and raised them there, and then they played the sound of these hawks and it terrified [22:18.240 --> 22:19.240] the birds. [22:19.240 --> 22:28.640] These birds had never heard one of these hawks, so it was clear that some of the bar behaviors [22:28.640 --> 22:38.240] we inherit from our parents and that's a reasonable way to help creatures get more sophisticated. [22:38.240 --> 22:46.440] So we have certain instinctual imperatives and then as we grow and learn, we develop [22:46.440 --> 22:52.520] meaning and understanding and we organize our meanings and understandings into contextual [22:52.520 --> 22:57.800] references, like anger, frustrated, happy, sad. [22:57.800 --> 23:04.280] We've got all these contextual references and something happens and we go to one of [23:04.280 --> 23:11.040] these references and then we open that middle drawer and in that middle drawer you've got [23:11.040 --> 23:14.280] all the things you can do to save when you're angry. [23:14.280 --> 23:21.680] And then you look closer at the other situation and you more down and find more and more specific [23:21.680 --> 23:24.720] contextual references. [23:24.720 --> 23:34.000] By breaking our behavior down into contextual references, we can become extremely sophisticated. [23:34.000 --> 23:39.440] And that's a great thing to be able to do and I'm going real short here because I don't [23:39.440 --> 23:48.240] want to get too deep into that mental map or that side of things. [23:48.240 --> 23:58.320] But from that, I've developed a method of writing and sometimes you'll hear me ask people [23:58.320 --> 24:03.280] to read my documents on the air and I always ask them to rip them to shreds. [24:03.280 --> 24:11.360] And there's one thing I always ask them to do and that is to tell me when you notice [24:11.360 --> 24:16.440] the writer as opposed to the content. [24:16.440 --> 24:20.480] And that goes to Referential Index. [24:20.480 --> 24:34.160] If I do my job right and I construct my prose carefully, I will not create questions in the [24:34.160 --> 24:39.840] mind of the reader that I didn't anticipate. [24:39.840 --> 24:44.720] Probably most everybody here at one time or other has been to a seminar and you go to [24:44.720 --> 24:51.360] a seminar and a guy is talking and they generally don't want you to record it because they sell [24:51.360 --> 24:52.360] the records. [24:52.360 --> 24:55.280] So you're sitting there taking notes. [24:55.280 --> 24:58.760] The guy is talking, you're taking notes. [24:58.760 --> 25:02.040] When you're taking notes, you're not listening to what he's saying so you've got to figure [25:02.040 --> 25:06.640] out a time when he's not going to say something important to take your notes, otherwise you [25:06.640 --> 25:07.640] miss good content. [25:07.640 --> 25:14.560] But then if you miss something, now you've got to try to, you've got to try to, you've [25:14.560 --> 25:23.240] got to take what he's saying now and reconstruct what he would have said before that you missed. [25:23.240 --> 25:25.200] And that just gets you further behind. [25:25.200 --> 25:26.200] Before long you're lost. [25:26.200 --> 25:35.600] When I do a seminar, I try to pay close attention to my listeners, especially those that are [25:35.600 --> 25:39.000] taking notes. [25:39.000 --> 25:44.480] I watch the ones taking notes and when they get a confused look on their face, I try to [25:44.480 --> 25:52.680] back up and try to elegantly restate what I've already said. [25:52.680 --> 25:58.200] When someone looks confused, I try to restate what I've already said. [25:58.200 --> 26:04.080] When I do a seminar, I tend to go over the same things two or three different times from [26:04.080 --> 26:09.800] two or three different perspectives so that I don't lose somebody and they fall behind [26:09.800 --> 26:13.600] and once you fall behind, you can almost never catch up. [26:13.600 --> 26:20.720] So the struggle with that, when I do radio, it's even more difficult. [26:20.720 --> 26:27.560] I can't gauge my audience, I can't see my audience and I like to work with a caller [26:27.560 --> 26:35.080] because then the caller can give me feedback on when what I'm saying makes sense and when [26:35.080 --> 26:37.520] it doesn't. [26:37.520 --> 26:46.720] The section in the e-book on mental flow, that section is all about how to construct [26:46.720 --> 26:54.120] your writing in a way such that you don't cause a mental interrupt in your reader. [26:54.120 --> 27:08.200] And I have a few rules that I've adopted to, oh, it looks like my phones are off. [27:08.200 --> 27:12.800] There we go, if you've been trying to call in and I apologize, I try to turn them on, [27:12.800 --> 27:13.800] I must see what's wrong. [27:13.800 --> 27:18.680] But okay, phone lines are on now so if you have a question or comment, give us a call. [27:18.680 --> 27:24.880] But I try to construct the narrative so that I anticipate the questions you're going to [27:24.880 --> 27:28.200] have in your mind and make sure I answer those. [27:28.200 --> 27:37.360] And there's some rules I have to keep that from inadvertently happening. [27:37.360 --> 27:48.640] One of the rules is never use pronouns, it is the job of a lawyer to misconstrue your [27:48.640 --> 27:53.280] document in any way that he can, bare wordsmiths. [27:53.280 --> 28:00.680] They will take your terminology and twist it and turn it any time you use a term that [28:00.680 --> 28:12.480] is a term of art that has a special meaning, define it, define it every time you use it [28:12.480 --> 28:22.160] if the times you use it are spaced more than 10 minutes, if it's a new term or if it's [28:22.160 --> 28:29.320] a term like a person, and you're using person to indicate a living, breathing, human being. [28:29.320 --> 28:35.720] The next time I use the word person, I indicate that in legalese, person means a legal fiction [28:35.720 --> 28:37.600] as well as a living, breathing, human being. [28:37.600 --> 28:42.640] And when I use person, I'm going to use it in the context of a living, breathing, human [28:42.640 --> 28:50.800] being and not a corporation, an organization, a trust. [28:50.800 --> 28:56.120] Those are persons under law but their legal fictions do not live and breathe human beings [28:56.120 --> 28:58.320] so I'll make those distinctions. [28:58.320 --> 29:07.000] I think Craig is real pedantic about automobile and vehicle or private conveyance in vehicle [29:07.000 --> 29:11.240] because they have different meanings so I'm careful when you use terms, make sure you [29:11.240 --> 29:13.600] define them. [29:13.600 --> 29:20.680] Never use pronouns unless you've used the proper noun in the same sentence that you're [29:20.680 --> 29:23.680] in. [29:23.680 --> 29:31.520] If you use a pronoun, your reader will always have to stop. [29:31.520 --> 29:43.480] Look back and make sure that the he, the reader assumes you met to reference by the pronoun [29:43.480 --> 29:48.280] is actually the he that he thought it was. [29:48.280 --> 29:54.880] He has to go back and see the narrative to make sure it all, at most, always causes a [29:54.880 --> 29:56.960] mental interruption. [29:56.960 --> 29:57.960] Not always. [29:57.960 --> 29:59.960] And that's just... [29:59.960 --> 30:06.000] Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat. [30:06.000 --> 30:10.320] A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid [30:10.320 --> 30:11.320] the stuff. [30:11.320 --> 30:15.200] I'll get your cap for it Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with the scoop on supposedly [30:15.200 --> 30:17.360] skinny sodas. [30:17.360 --> 30:18.960] Privacy is under attack. [30:18.960 --> 30:22.560] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:22.560 --> 30:27.320] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:27.320 --> 30:32.600] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:32.600 --> 30:35.080] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:35.080 --> 30:39.400] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:39.400 --> 30:42.920] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:42.920 --> 30:45.920] Start over with StartPage. [30:45.920 --> 30:50.440] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? [30:50.440 --> 30:51.440] Wrong. [30:51.440 --> 30:56.160] Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. [30:56.160 --> 31:01.120] They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more [31:01.120 --> 31:02.880] than no soda at all. [31:02.880 --> 31:07.680] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, [31:07.680 --> 31:10.040] don't deliver anything to squelch it. [31:10.040 --> 31:14.360] Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger [31:14.360 --> 31:16.080] overall calorie intake. [31:16.080 --> 31:20.640] So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, [31:20.640 --> 31:23.880] avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead. [31:23.880 --> 31:53.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [32:54.840 --> 33:03.880] Order your coffee today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:03.880 --> 33:14.880] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:14.880 --> 33:24.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'm gonna solve them, to the end of the momentum, prosecute [33:24.880 --> 33:25.880] them. [33:25.880 --> 33:26.880] OK. [33:26.880 --> 33:27.880] What was that? [33:27.880 --> 33:45.880] Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wickedly. [33:45.880 --> 33:46.880] OK. [33:46.880 --> 33:47.880] We are back. [33:47.880 --> 33:49.880] We're ready to go to the radio. [33:49.880 --> 33:54.880] It was my fault with the car boards. [33:54.880 --> 33:59.880] Looks like we have them up, we have a board full of callers. [33:59.880 --> 34:03.880] Let me go through a little bit more of mental slow. [34:03.880 --> 34:04.880] Just kind of basic. [34:04.880 --> 34:09.880] So you get an idea of what is in the e-book. [34:09.880 --> 34:10.880] Mental slow. [34:10.880 --> 34:11.880] Never use pronouns. [34:11.880 --> 34:18.880] Pronouns don't always cause a mental interrupt, where you have to go back and make sure you're [34:18.880 --> 34:23.880] attaching the pronoun to the right proper noun, but the problem with that is sometimes [34:23.880 --> 34:27.880] you get the pronoun attached to the wrong proper noun and you don't know it. [34:27.880 --> 34:31.880] And then down the road it becomes a problem. [34:31.880 --> 34:41.880] If I write the, say I'm referring to a person and I write the person's name every time, [34:41.880 --> 34:43.880] it doesn't slow down the reader. [34:43.880 --> 34:47.880] It slows down the writer because we had to put the whole name in. [34:47.880 --> 34:52.880] But the reader sees the name and recognizes it. [34:52.880 --> 34:58.880] You know, when we read, we don't look at a word and say flow and say F-L-O-W flow. [34:58.880 --> 35:03.880] I-S is, we look at it and we recognize it. [35:03.880 --> 35:08.880] Sometimes we look at a word, we know what it is, but something in our mind says, wait [35:08.880 --> 35:11.880] a minute, something's not right with that. [35:11.880 --> 35:13.880] It's not spelled right. [35:13.880 --> 35:19.880] And then you go inside because you've got a picture of it and look at your picture of [35:19.880 --> 35:23.880] it and compare your picture to what you're seeing and it tells you what's wrong with [35:23.880 --> 35:24.880] it. [35:24.880 --> 35:27.880] See, we don't read the word, we recognize it. [35:27.880 --> 35:32.880] So if it's a long name, we see the name and we recognize it instantly and just step [35:32.880 --> 35:35.880] right over, it does not slow us down. [35:35.880 --> 35:41.880] Other than you notice the fact that you used the proper name and stood up the pronoun. [35:41.880 --> 35:51.880] But noticing that I did something that doesn't trip you up, doesn't knock you out of flow. [35:51.880 --> 35:57.880] This leads directly to never use acronyms. [35:57.880 --> 36:01.880] Pronouns will not always knock the reader out of flow. [36:01.880 --> 36:07.880] Acronyms will always knock the reader out of flow. [36:07.880 --> 36:15.880] FDCPA, when you see FDCPA, even if I put Faraday Collections Practices Act, brackets, [36:15.880 --> 36:19.880] FDCPA, it tells you what it is. [36:19.880 --> 36:27.880] Two sentences later, I put FDCPA, you still have to stop and make sure that's not FCRA [36:27.880 --> 36:28.880] or some other acronym. [36:28.880 --> 36:34.880] You have to stop and look at each letter and mentally convert it into a word to make sure [36:34.880 --> 36:38.880] that it's not a different acronym than the one you expected. [36:38.880 --> 36:44.880] An acronym will always trip your reader out of flow. [36:44.880 --> 36:55.880] If you're addressing a complex subject for your balancing four or five different parameters [36:55.880 --> 37:02.880] and then you trip your reader out of flow, it's kind of like what I used to be a shoulder [37:02.880 --> 37:04.880] back in my teens. [37:04.880 --> 37:10.880] And I would have four or five hamburgers on the grill, half a dozen eggs, chicken in [37:10.880 --> 37:13.880] the broasters, pizzas in the oven, I know where everything is. [37:13.880 --> 37:17.880] I know exactly how long everything's been where it's at. [37:17.880 --> 37:19.880] I'm smoking. [37:19.880 --> 37:24.880] And then the waitress comes back and asks me a question. [37:24.880 --> 37:30.880] I answer the question and turn around and look and I have no idea where everything is at. [37:30.880 --> 37:34.880] And they used to do that all the time, I think, just to make me crazy. [37:34.880 --> 37:36.880] They knocked me out of flow. [37:36.880 --> 37:39.880] I was in the groove and I lost it all. [37:39.880 --> 37:42.880] This is what happens to your reader. [37:42.880 --> 37:48.880] So never use pronouns, never use acronyms if you can avoid it. [37:48.880 --> 37:55.880] Any time you use an acronym, the only time I use an acronym is if I have used the proper [37:55.880 --> 38:05.880] name earlier in the sentence and I have hyphenated the acronym next to the proper name. [38:05.880 --> 38:09.880] So if they're not certain, they can just glance back to the front of the sentence, [38:09.880 --> 38:14.880] compare what they're seeing to what I put there and they know they haven't misinterpreted it [38:14.880 --> 38:19.880] and they keep going, they don't drop out of flow. [38:19.880 --> 38:27.880] Never make proactive statements of law out of your own mouth if you're writing a legal document. [38:27.880 --> 38:31.880] And you say, well, they can't do this and they can't do that. [38:31.880 --> 38:32.880] Excuse me. [38:32.880 --> 38:35.880] The reader's going to say, why not? [38:35.880 --> 38:42.880] Who says, especially if it's a professional reader, what would you come up with that? [38:42.880 --> 38:51.880] Always when you say they can't do this, you say they can't do this according to 39.03 [38:51.880 --> 38:56.880] Texas Penal Code, which reads as follows and quote it. [38:56.880 --> 39:07.880] If the reader knows what 39.03 is, you do the quotes and you shrink both margins through [39:07.880 --> 39:12.880] them single space, shrink them two points in font. [39:12.880 --> 39:18.880] So they're stitched together tighter, they're indented in both sides, the smaller text. [39:18.880 --> 39:22.880] It's clear of where the quotation starts and where it ends. [39:22.880 --> 39:27.880] I don't know how many legal documents I've read that had quotations in them. [39:27.880 --> 39:38.880] And I'm studying the content and I miss that final quotation mark that's in line with the narrative. [39:38.880 --> 39:46.880] And I'm not sure when the quotation ended and when the lawyer's argument began. [39:46.880 --> 39:52.880] And it's really disconcerting because I have to go back and reread and study the document to make [39:52.880 --> 39:57.880] sure I find what the lawyer said as opposed to what the court said. [39:57.880 --> 40:01.880] So mark them out. [40:01.880 --> 40:11.880] Put a paragraph on every single paragraph, I'm sorry, put a heading on every paragraph. [40:11.880 --> 40:18.880] When you're writing legal documents, never write a paragraph without putting heading on it. [40:18.880 --> 40:27.880] You take it off later, but when you write any complex document, be it a legal document [40:27.880 --> 40:33.880] or a paper for school or something else, put a heading on every paragraph. [40:33.880 --> 40:37.880] With word processors that's really easy. [40:37.880 --> 40:45.880] And when you do that, you can, like in Microsoft Word, you can go in, you can hit CTRL-F which does searches. [40:45.880 --> 40:52.880] When the search window opens up, underneath where you put in the search term, there's three little boxes. [40:52.880 --> 40:54.880] The third one is the search one. [40:54.880 --> 40:55.880] Do you click the first one? [40:55.880 --> 40:58.880] It'll give you a navigation pane. [40:58.880 --> 41:05.880] And that navigation pane, all the headings you can put in, you can see is a table of contents. [41:05.880 --> 41:12.880] That is if you use the styles heading in Microsoft Word or open office. [41:12.880 --> 41:21.880] Instead of writing the heading, you go up and click one of the styles, like paragraph heading one, two, three, or four. [41:21.880 --> 41:23.880] And then write in what it is. [41:23.880 --> 41:27.880] That will create a running table of contents. [41:27.880 --> 41:33.880] So once you're down toward the end of the document, you can open up that table of contents for you. [41:33.880 --> 41:41.880] And I always go down it and look at my headings and see if I have essentially the same heading more than once. [41:41.880 --> 41:45.880] And I find I always do. [41:45.880 --> 41:59.880] And then I go back and I look at the two different places I've argued this issue and figure out which one I needed in and which one I could just refer back to the first time. [41:59.880 --> 42:11.880] And this keeps your reader from getting frustrating and annoyed because you don't necessarily notice it when you're writing it because you're so deep in the content. [42:11.880 --> 42:17.880] But the reader will always trip over that and be annoyed and having to read the same argument more than once. [42:17.880 --> 42:22.880] And I seem to always find this in legal documents by lawyers. [42:22.880 --> 42:26.880] This is a mistake they seem to always make. [42:26.880 --> 42:28.880] It's frustrating. [42:28.880 --> 42:31.880] Okay, that'll give you an idea. [42:31.880 --> 42:36.880] There's really a lot more to the idea of flow. [42:36.880 --> 42:49.880] I didn't get into artful vagueness, deep structure as opposed to surface structure that goes into deletions, distortions, and nominalizations. [42:49.880 --> 42:57.880] There's a lot of linguistic tools that we can use to increase the effectiveness of our narrative. [42:57.880 --> 43:01.880] And I have a lot of that in the ebook. [43:01.880 --> 43:04.880] Okay, we have a whole board full of callers. [43:04.880 --> 43:07.880] So I'm going to stop that for the moment. [43:07.880 --> 43:11.880] And we've got about 50 seconds to the break. [43:11.880 --> 43:19.880] So as soon as I come back from the break, we will start with our callers and we'll go to Scott in Texas in the meantime. [43:19.880 --> 43:25.880] We are working to upgrade our equipment here at Louis Radio Network. [43:25.880 --> 43:38.880] And when we have appreciated any help we can get, you might go to Logos Radio Network over the break and check out the ebook and ADS traffic seminar and Dr. Graves jurisdiction area. [43:38.880 --> 43:48.880] These are three tools that will be very valuable if you have issues that you need, and you need help getting it done. [43:48.880 --> 43:59.880] Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [43:59.880 --> 44:08.880] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [44:08.880 --> 44:13.880] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. [44:13.880 --> 44:18.880] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [44:18.880 --> 44:23.880] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top, accredited metal dealers and journalists. [44:23.880 --> 44:26.880] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [44:26.880 --> 44:31.880] In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products, such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burks. [44:31.880 --> 44:38.880] We also offer one-world-way, Mountain House storeable foods, Berkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. [44:38.880 --> 44:45.880] We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6400. [44:45.880 --> 44:50.880] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [44:50.880 --> 44:53.880] We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2. [44:53.880 --> 44:59.880] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6400. [44:59.880 --> 45:03.880] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.880 --> 45:10.880] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [45:10.880 --> 45:14.880] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.880 --> 45:18.880] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.880 --> 45:22.880] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.880 --> 45:27.880] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:27.880 --> 45:33.880] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:33.880 --> 45:38.880] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:38.880 --> 45:42.880] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:42.880 --> 45:49.880] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.880 --> 45:51.880] prosay tactics, and much more. [45:51.880 --> 46:00.880] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [46:00.880 --> 46:21.880] Okay, we are back. [46:21.880 --> 46:25.880] We're into Kelsen, rule of law radio, and we're going to our callers. [46:25.880 --> 46:27.880] We're going to Scott in Texas. [46:27.880 --> 46:28.880] Hello, Scott. [46:28.880 --> 46:30.880] What do you have for us? [46:30.880 --> 46:31.880] Howdy. [46:31.880 --> 46:33.880] I finally turned on the phones there. [46:33.880 --> 46:34.880] I see how you are. [46:34.880 --> 46:36.880] You just wanted the halls all the airtime. [46:36.880 --> 46:39.880] That's me. [46:39.880 --> 46:41.880] Yep. [46:41.880 --> 46:44.880] Well, just got a quick question here. [46:44.880 --> 46:50.880] I had naturally had that hearing about a week ago, [46:50.880 --> 47:00.880] and I filed a motion for the court transcript. [47:00.880 --> 47:08.880] So, since I filed that, do I also need to follow a motion for an extension of time [47:08.880 --> 47:15.880] while I'm waiting on my answer for the transcript, or is that good enough? [47:15.880 --> 47:24.880] Well, it depends on how quick, since this is essentially not a court where they have [47:24.880 --> 47:30.880] a court reporter and they keep a recording, probably we won't take them long. [47:30.880 --> 47:39.880] If it takes them more than a week, then you might ask for a continuance to give time to [47:39.880 --> 47:49.880] receive and transcribe the recording. [47:49.880 --> 47:52.880] Right, right. [47:52.880 --> 47:53.880] Okay. [47:53.880 --> 48:00.880] Well, I was just wondering, so, and then I just got some other things that are coming [48:00.880 --> 48:07.880] up with the appeal, and I sent you what you probably haven't had a chance to look at that [48:07.880 --> 48:11.880] email about the appeal to see about that. [48:11.880 --> 48:15.880] So, I was wondering if you're going to be able to have a little time. [48:15.880 --> 48:21.880] We can kind of work on that and get a template set up or something. [48:21.880 --> 48:25.880] Yeah, but we talked about that last year. [48:25.880 --> 48:26.880] Yeah, I know. [48:26.880 --> 48:33.880] So, but other than that, I just got some criminal charges to follow on some judges [48:33.880 --> 48:35.880] and write that stuff up this week. [48:35.880 --> 48:44.880] So, we'll get that out and I guess I'll let you go for tonight because I don't have a [48:44.880 --> 48:45.880] whole lot going on. [48:45.880 --> 48:48.880] That was just my main question about extension of time. [48:48.880 --> 48:49.880] Oh, okay. [48:49.880 --> 48:54.880] I have a, I'm doing an appeal right now. [48:54.880 --> 49:01.880] This, getting these put together is something I want to do, the complaints and such, and [49:01.880 --> 49:07.880] your appeal because I need to get one written for the traffic site. [49:07.880 --> 49:09.880] So, yeah, I'll help you with that. [49:09.880 --> 49:17.880] We will build a kind of a generic set of planes to make. [49:17.880 --> 49:20.880] So, we'll go through what happened and I'll create a questionnaire. [49:20.880 --> 49:28.880] I've already got a questionnaire on, I've got first appearance and then first hearing. [49:28.880 --> 49:33.880] And we'll go through the questionnaire and see what happened that I don't have in the [49:33.880 --> 49:35.880] questionnaire and we'll add that in. [49:35.880 --> 49:43.880] And I'll put in links to documents and links to claims and causes of action. [49:43.880 --> 49:48.880] And then we will, we'll get to the appropriate spot. [49:48.880 --> 49:56.880] We will put in a call to the civil lawsuit and I'll build the suit and then the system [49:56.880 --> 50:01.880] could start cranking these suits out. [50:01.880 --> 50:04.880] Now, initially they may not have everything in them. [50:04.880 --> 50:09.880] They'll only have what we have programmed into the system. [50:09.880 --> 50:16.880] But as new things happen, as the judge, you know, once we hammer the judges for what they're doing, [50:16.880 --> 50:23.880] you can count on them to begin to get creative. [50:23.880 --> 50:31.880] And the problem is, is there are thousands of judges around the state of Texas. [50:31.880 --> 50:41.880] And we have one repository for all these different judges doing all these different things. [50:41.880 --> 50:44.880] We bring them into this repository. [50:44.880 --> 50:51.880] Each time we get something different, we add a set of questions, create a remedy for those issues. [50:51.880 --> 50:55.880] And then once we've done that one time, it's locked into the system. [50:55.880 --> 50:56.880] Then we get a new one. [50:56.880 --> 50:57.880] We add it in. [50:57.880 --> 51:05.880] It won't be long till they will run out of interesting and innovative things they can do. [51:05.880 --> 51:12.880] But what the next day, we're not landing on them like a ton of bricks. [51:12.880 --> 51:16.880] So we're about to get to the fun part. [51:16.880 --> 51:23.880] Well, yeah, because once you get past, you know, the trial and everything, and you kind of have your head, [51:23.880 --> 51:28.880] your mindset set on, you were going to get ruled on against every which way, [51:28.880 --> 51:36.880] then now you start going in there and start really hammering on them from this end. [51:36.880 --> 51:40.880] This is where we're really, the worm turns. [51:40.880 --> 51:49.880] And this is where their attention starts really becoming a lot more focused on what's going on. [51:49.880 --> 51:54.880] And I can't wait to really go ahead and start putting the screws to some of this. [51:54.880 --> 51:57.880] So it's going to be quite interesting. [51:57.880 --> 52:04.880] And most of these appeals, I mean, they're all going to be so quasi-similar. [52:04.880 --> 52:12.880] And, you know, shoot, I had a cross-examination script that I even went off of. [52:12.880 --> 52:23.880] So some of the questions that I was able to pry some of the answers out of this guy are going to really help to formulate future questions too. [52:23.880 --> 52:27.880] So we'll be able to head off in the past. [52:27.880 --> 52:28.880] Yeah. [52:28.880 --> 52:31.880] I'm glad you brought that up. [52:31.880 --> 52:36.880] One of the things we'll be getting to is an app. [52:36.880 --> 52:45.880] You can bring it on your computer or tell the judge that you have an app you need to run on the cell phone. [52:45.880 --> 52:49.880] And the app will have the questionnaire in it. [52:49.880 --> 52:59.880] We'll build a set of questionnaires for a examination of the officer or witness or whatever it is. [52:59.880 --> 53:10.880] And this is, see, the questionnaire itself is designed to secure a yes-no answer. [53:10.880 --> 53:14.880] So we get the lawyer on the stand. [53:14.880 --> 53:15.880] Let me get the lawyer. [53:15.880 --> 53:18.880] We get the officer on the stand. [53:18.880 --> 53:20.880] And we tell the officer we have some questions. [53:20.880 --> 53:24.880] And I'll be asking all of these questions in the form of a yes-no. [53:24.880 --> 53:28.880] And I'm going to ask you to answer yes or no. [53:28.880 --> 53:34.880] If I ask for explanation, if I need explanation, I will ask for it. [53:34.880 --> 53:37.880] And then you start asking the questions. [53:37.880 --> 53:39.880] And you have this app. [53:39.880 --> 53:40.880] You ask the question. [53:40.880 --> 53:43.880] And if they say yes, you click the yes. [53:43.880 --> 53:46.880] And then it gives you the next question to ask. [53:46.880 --> 53:50.880] If they click the click no, it gives you a different question to ask. [53:50.880 --> 53:54.880] And you walk down through these questions. [53:54.880 --> 54:09.880] And if the prosecutor objects, we will have a opposition to the objection that when we build this questionnaire, [54:09.880 --> 54:18.880] it has a tool tip, a tool in it where you'll have the question on one side of the screen. [54:18.880 --> 54:23.880] And in the middle, you'll have an explanation of why we asked the question. [54:23.880 --> 54:30.880] And we'll put in a place for handling objections. [54:30.880 --> 54:41.880] And then if you get an objection, then you'll have a place to click to go to the next question that won't get the same objection. [54:41.880 --> 54:59.880] And if you're asking him about what kind of clothes his grandmother wears, and you ask if she wears combat boots in the prosecutor of Jacks, then you don't want to go to the next one and ask if she wears leather jackets. [54:59.880 --> 55:11.880] For example, with that section, go to the next and keep going so we can create a set of questions that the prosecutor won't be able to interrupt you. [55:11.880 --> 55:15.880] You could just go to the next section and keep going. [55:15.880 --> 55:18.880] And we'll have an extensive set of questions. [55:18.880 --> 55:22.880] And they'll be designed to all be on point. [55:22.880 --> 55:29.880] That's the next tool we will create after we create the initial questionnaire. [55:29.880 --> 55:33.880] So it's in the pipe. [55:33.880 --> 55:35.880] We just got to get to it. [55:35.880 --> 55:36.880] I understand. [55:36.880 --> 55:43.880] Yeah, that was, I went in there with 32 pages of cross-examination script already prepared. [55:43.880 --> 55:52.880] So I got to fire away as much as they would let me, you know, you know, they would rule against me on some of the judges. [55:52.880 --> 55:56.880] Let me go ahead and get a couple of them answered though. [55:56.880 --> 55:59.880] He didn't rule against me on every daggum thing. [55:59.880 --> 56:08.880] But we will put together a questionnaire that has a legal explanation of why you best this question. [56:08.880 --> 56:17.880] So when the prosecutor objects, then you just go down and read the opposition to the objection. [56:17.880 --> 56:18.880] Right. [56:18.880 --> 56:21.880] Makes it more difficult. [56:21.880 --> 56:22.880] Oh, yeah. [56:22.880 --> 56:29.880] Even though when they still rule against you, but all you're doing now is just perfecting the appeal. [56:29.880 --> 56:46.880] And then everything that we start sucking out of them now is just going to be information that we use to help build questionnaires that can, you know, address those issues before they even get to them. [56:46.880 --> 57:02.880] And one of the things that the tutor will do when you answer a question, it will keep a record what it does is adds a statement to a statement of facts. [57:02.880 --> 57:05.880] And then you'll do an output report when you're done. [57:05.880 --> 57:10.880] So it's taking notes for you as you move through the questions. [57:10.880 --> 57:19.880] So you won't have to take notes to keep track of what the answers were that this tool will do that for you. [57:19.880 --> 57:20.880] Okay. [57:20.880 --> 57:21.880] Just do. [57:21.880 --> 57:22.880] All right. [57:22.880 --> 57:23.880] Whoa. [57:23.880 --> 57:24.880] Thank you, Scott. [57:24.880 --> 57:25.880] Be back. [57:25.880 --> 57:26.880] Okay. [57:26.880 --> 57:27.880] Okay. [57:27.880 --> 57:30.880] Now we're going to Mark in Wisconsin. [57:30.880 --> 57:32.880] Hello, Mark. [57:32.880 --> 57:35.880] What do you have for us today? [57:35.880 --> 57:54.880] Well, Mr. Kilton, I wanted to make sure I've got the Peckin' Order correct in the courtroom and have a question about attempting to use the pre-loss of discovery in the Feds. [57:54.880 --> 57:59.880] So it sounds like we've got the break coming up. [57:59.880 --> 58:01.880] Yes, as a matter of fact, we do. [58:01.880 --> 58:09.880] This is Randy Kelsen, root of law radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. [58:09.880 --> 58:12.880] We're going to our top of the hour break. [58:12.880 --> 58:16.880] So the music generally comes on about 30 seconds early. [58:16.880 --> 58:18.880] So I've got a little more time. [58:18.880 --> 58:22.880] We would like each of you to go check out Logos Radio Network. [58:22.880 --> 58:29.880] And you might, if you buy much on Amazon, you might go and work out how to set up a link to Amazon. [58:29.880 --> 58:34.880] Anything we can get in helps to support this radio station. [58:34.880 --> 58:38.880] We literally keep this thing going on a shoestring. [58:38.880 --> 58:42.880] And shoestrings at the moment are getting a bit threadbare. [58:42.880 --> 58:43.880] Hang on. [58:43.880 --> 59:10.880] We'll be right back. [59:13.880 --> 59:17.880] These books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:17.880 --> 59:23.880] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, [59:23.880 --> 59:27.880] growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. [59:27.880 --> 59:33.880] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, [59:33.880 --> 59:44.880] call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, [59:44.880 --> 59:50.880] or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:50.880 --> 59:59.880] Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [59:59.880 --> 01:00:07.880] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdowns. [01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:14.880] Markets for Wednesday, the 7th of March, 2018 are trading with gold at $1,327.21 an ounce, [01:00:14.880 --> 01:00:19.880] silver $16.49 an ounce, Texas crude $62.60 a barrel, [01:00:19.880 --> 01:00:29.880] Bitcoins at $9,883.87, Ethereum $748.18, Bitcoin Cash $1,086.63, [01:00:29.880 --> 01:00:39.880] and finally Litecoins at $181.10 a crypto coin. [01:00:39.880 --> 01:00:44.880] Okay, in history, the year 1989, Iran and the United Kingdom break diplomatic relations [01:00:44.880 --> 01:00:49.880] after a fight over Simon Rushdie's controversial novel, The Cetanic Versus, [01:00:49.880 --> 01:00:53.880] to date in history. [01:00:53.880 --> 01:00:57.880] In recent news, President Trump's top economic adviser, Gary D. Cohn, [01:00:57.880 --> 01:01:00.880] stated yesterday, Tuesday that he was indeed resigning, [01:01:00.880 --> 01:01:04.880] this after giving a heads-up last week, that he was considering doing so [01:01:04.880 --> 01:01:09.880] if President Trump decided to follow through with his tariffs on imported aluminum and steel. [01:01:09.880 --> 01:01:12.880] Of course, with President Trump's announcement last week that he would indeed [01:01:12.880 --> 01:01:17.880] levy tariffs on aluminum and steel imports, the reason for Mr. Cohn's departure [01:01:17.880 --> 01:01:21.880] seems obvious for many, considering he was one of the lone vocal opponents [01:01:21.880 --> 01:01:27.880] of any such measures in the administration. [01:01:27.880 --> 01:01:31.880] According to a report by The Daily Mail, skeletal biology expert Richard Jantz [01:01:31.880 --> 01:01:34.880] at the University of Tennessee believes he may have found the skeletal remains [01:01:34.880 --> 01:01:37.880] of Amelia Earhart on a Pacific Island. [01:01:37.880 --> 01:01:41.880] Amelia went missing in 1937 when her plane and navigator Fred Newton [01:01:41.880 --> 01:01:43.880] were never to be found. [01:01:43.880 --> 01:01:45.880] At least until now, Richard Jantz stated that, [01:01:45.880 --> 01:01:49.880] what I can say scientifically is that they, the recent Pacific Island remains, [01:01:49.880 --> 01:01:52.880] are 99% likely to be hers. [01:01:52.880 --> 01:01:54.880] Interesting timing for this finding to be released, [01:01:54.880 --> 01:01:58.880] considering that the 1932 Hudson-Essex Terraplane, which once belonged to Earhart, [01:01:58.880 --> 01:02:02.880] was reportedly stolen on Friday, February 23rd, 2018, [01:02:02.880 --> 01:02:12.880] only to be found three days later on the street corner in the Sereno neighborhood in LA. [01:02:12.880 --> 01:02:15.880] The crypto market took a big blow today, Wednesday, [01:02:15.880 --> 01:02:18.880] with the top ten currencies suffering 5-10% losses. [01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:21.880] This downturn right after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced [01:02:21.880 --> 01:02:25.880] that it would be requiring digital asset exchanges to register with them. [01:02:25.880 --> 01:02:27.880] According to the sex statement, quote, [01:02:27.880 --> 01:02:30.880] if a platform offers trading of digital assets that are securities [01:02:30.880 --> 01:02:34.880] and operates as an exchange as defined by the federal securities laws, [01:02:34.880 --> 01:02:39.880] then the platform must register with the SEC as a National Securities Exchange, [01:02:39.880 --> 01:02:42.880] or be exempt from registration. [01:02:42.880 --> 01:02:45.880] The Lowdown Lowdown is looking for sponsors. [01:02:45.880 --> 01:02:47.880] If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, [01:02:47.880 --> 01:02:52.880] feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. [01:02:52.880 --> 01:02:59.880] This was Rick Rody with your Lowdown for March 7th, 2018. [01:02:59.880 --> 01:03:14.880] Music [01:03:14.880 --> 01:03:18.880] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton of Rule by Renio. [01:03:18.880 --> 01:03:22.880] And we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. [01:03:22.880 --> 01:03:28.880] Okay, Mark, what have you been up to recently? [01:03:28.880 --> 01:03:33.880] Well, just trying to fill out the paperwork [01:03:33.880 --> 01:03:38.880] and answer the various and sundry pleadings. [01:03:38.880 --> 01:03:43.880] And along those lines, I wanted to get an understanding [01:03:43.880 --> 01:03:46.880] of how the pecking order works in the courtroom. [01:03:46.880 --> 01:03:51.880] In Milwaukee County, they have a supplemental judge, [01:03:51.880 --> 01:03:57.880] who is apparently a political appointee that each judge can make [01:03:57.880 --> 01:04:01.880] and is an assistant can do very little. [01:04:01.880 --> 01:04:03.880] Then there's court commissioners. [01:04:03.880 --> 01:04:06.880] The court commissioners can do a number of things, [01:04:06.880 --> 01:04:09.880] but ultimately not trials. [01:04:09.880 --> 01:04:12.880] And so then we have the judges. [01:04:12.880 --> 01:04:18.880] Now, my understanding is a chief judge is the same as a regular judge, [01:04:18.880 --> 01:04:23.880] except chief judge has a title and extra responsibility. [01:04:23.880 --> 01:04:28.880] So if that is the correct interpretation of what's going on, [01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:35.880] if a judge going in and out of the rotation makes a decision, [01:04:35.880 --> 01:04:40.880] the next judge is stuck with it until the appellate court weighs it. [01:04:40.880 --> 01:04:42.880] Am I correct? [01:04:42.880 --> 01:04:48.880] Okay, when you say judge, you're referring to the actual judge [01:04:48.880 --> 01:04:57.880] and not one of the appointed, limited capacity individuals? [01:04:57.880 --> 01:04:58.880] Correct. [01:04:58.880 --> 01:05:01.880] They actually have judge in their title, [01:05:01.880 --> 01:05:07.880] and they are, for all intents and purposes, a judge. [01:05:07.880 --> 01:05:11.880] Milwaukee rotates them around such that at some point, [01:05:11.880 --> 01:05:17.880] they go in and out of the higher stress ones like family [01:05:17.880 --> 01:05:21.880] and sensitive crimes, [01:05:21.880 --> 01:05:25.880] because apparently the judges end up with PTSD. [01:05:25.880 --> 01:05:29.880] Yeah, when those judges render a ruling, [01:05:29.880 --> 01:05:34.880] those rulings are final unless they're overturned by an appeal court. [01:05:34.880 --> 01:05:37.880] So yes, they're real appeals. [01:05:37.880 --> 01:05:39.880] That's what I thought. [01:05:39.880 --> 01:05:40.880] That's what I thought. [01:05:40.880 --> 01:05:47.880] All right, I was reading a particular case, [01:05:47.880 --> 01:05:54.880] Seeger v. AFNI Inc. [01:05:54.880 --> 01:05:58.880] 2007 case in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [01:05:58.880 --> 01:06:06.880] And what I noticed is the bona fide error defense, [01:06:06.880 --> 01:06:11.880] where basically you have to, [01:06:11.880 --> 01:06:18.880] and the debt collector has to have documentation as to... [01:06:18.880 --> 01:06:20.880] Wait, hold on. [01:06:20.880 --> 01:06:23.880] Let's go back to bona fide error. [01:06:23.880 --> 01:06:27.880] What does bona fide mean? [01:06:27.880 --> 01:06:33.880] Well, bona fide means a made in good faith without fraud, [01:06:33.880 --> 01:06:36.880] sincere, genuine. [01:06:36.880 --> 01:06:39.880] Okay, so excusable error. [01:06:39.880 --> 01:06:41.880] Right, excusable error. [01:06:41.880 --> 01:06:48.880] In Black's Law 168, 1999, that is what was cited. [01:06:48.880 --> 01:06:52.880] Okay, so that's where I wanted to go and make sure. [01:06:52.880 --> 01:06:58.880] Okay, so they go ahead and say there's three prongs to it. [01:06:58.880 --> 01:07:01.880] It must be presumed that the violation was non-tentional. [01:07:01.880 --> 01:07:05.880] It must be shown that the violation resulted in bona fide error. [01:07:05.880 --> 01:07:08.880] It must be shown that it maintained procedures [01:07:08.880 --> 01:07:14.880] reasonably adapted to avoid such error. [01:07:14.880 --> 01:07:19.880] How do I go ahead and then, in a pre-law suit, [01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:25.880] say, turn over these policies and procedures? [01:07:25.880 --> 01:07:30.880] That's not how pre-litigation discovery works. [01:07:30.880 --> 01:07:34.880] In all the states, in pre-litigation discovery, [01:07:34.880 --> 01:07:39.880] you don't get to force production of documents. [01:07:39.880 --> 01:07:43.880] You only get to do depositions. [01:07:43.880 --> 01:07:45.880] Okay. [01:07:45.880 --> 01:07:55.880] You want to depose whoever would be the office manager, [01:07:55.880 --> 01:08:01.880] whoever maintains the policies and procedures of the office. [01:08:01.880 --> 01:08:04.880] And you ask them, how do you keep records? [01:08:04.880 --> 01:08:09.880] How do you schedule your trials and how do you maintain your business [01:08:09.880 --> 01:08:16.880] in order to ensure against unexcusable error? [01:08:16.880 --> 01:08:19.880] Okay. [01:08:19.880 --> 01:08:23.880] All right. [01:08:23.880 --> 01:08:31.880] Okay. Well, then that's going to not be as helpful as I had hoped [01:08:31.880 --> 01:08:34.880] simply because of the expense. [01:08:34.880 --> 01:08:36.880] Yeah, they're trying to... [01:08:36.880 --> 01:08:41.880] You can really do that by phone. [01:08:41.880 --> 01:08:42.880] Okay. [01:08:42.880 --> 01:08:44.880] A phone deposition. [01:08:44.880 --> 01:08:51.880] But they don't want to put a non-litigant into position. [01:08:51.880 --> 01:08:56.880] They don't want to put out a lot of money to produce production of documents [01:08:56.880 --> 01:08:59.880] when there may not be a case. [01:08:59.880 --> 01:09:01.880] Okay. [01:09:01.880 --> 01:09:03.880] Okay. [01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:09.880] Eric, I was trying to figure out a way since the attorney's in this case [01:09:09.880 --> 01:09:18.880] with cap one, which if you take cap one and make it one word, it's capone. [01:09:18.880 --> 01:09:26.880] So if what cap one's attorney has not come forward with any documentation [01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:33.880] unless forced and his answer is I'm not... [01:09:33.880 --> 01:09:35.880] The judge made a ruling. [01:09:35.880 --> 01:09:38.880] I don't have to produce anything more for you. [01:09:38.880 --> 01:09:41.880] And the ruling said nothing of the sort. [01:09:41.880 --> 01:09:46.880] But since he wrote the ruling, the judge signed. [01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:51.880] That's the way it's interpreted. [01:09:51.880 --> 01:09:53.880] All right. [01:09:53.880 --> 01:10:00.880] Well, you can interpret it differently and ask a grand jury what they think about it. [01:10:00.880 --> 01:10:04.880] Well, we've had grand juries in Wisconsin. [01:10:04.880 --> 01:10:16.880] The only time a grand jury gets called is if somebody succeeds on a 968.01 or 968.122 John Doe. [01:10:16.880 --> 01:10:27.880] I still haven't been successful in getting a list of the dollar amounts. [01:10:27.880 --> 01:10:29.880] Okay. [01:10:29.880 --> 01:10:33.880] I came across an interesting case law recently. [01:10:33.880 --> 01:10:34.880] All right. [01:10:34.880 --> 01:10:42.880] And it said that due process rings equally in the Fed as in the state. [01:10:42.880 --> 01:10:43.880] Okay. [01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:48.880] So if a public official fares form a due to his quite formative process, [01:10:48.880 --> 01:10:54.880] and as you'd fold free access to enjoyment and rights, that's a due process violation. [01:10:54.880 --> 01:10:59.880] And it rings under 18 U.S. Code 242. [01:10:59.880 --> 01:11:01.880] Okay. [01:11:01.880 --> 01:11:04.880] So file it with a federal grand jury. [01:11:04.880 --> 01:11:05.880] Okay. [01:11:05.880 --> 01:11:12.880] That'll get your attention because the FBI is not going to do anything. [01:11:12.880 --> 01:11:19.880] But in order to cover their behinds, they are going to call these guys and say, [01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:21.880] folks, what is going on here? [01:11:21.880 --> 01:11:24.880] I got a guy trying to get me to come down and arrest you. [01:11:24.880 --> 01:11:28.880] Give me a good reason why I shouldn't do that. [01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:29.880] Right. [01:11:29.880 --> 01:11:31.880] And that's the CYA. [01:11:31.880 --> 01:11:38.880] And when these guys get a call from the feds, they're going to get excited. [01:11:38.880 --> 01:11:39.880] Okay. [01:11:39.880 --> 01:11:46.880] And what was that 15, 15 U.S.C.? [01:11:46.880 --> 01:11:51.880] No, 18 U.S.C. of 1982. [01:11:51.880 --> 01:11:52.880] I'm sorry. [01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:53.880] 18 U.S. [01:11:53.880 --> 01:11:55.880] I'm mixing up the Ku Klux Klan Act. [01:11:55.880 --> 01:12:00.880] Now, 18 U.S. Code 242 is the criminal side. [01:12:00.880 --> 01:12:03.880] 42 U.S. Code 1983 is the criminal side. [01:12:03.880 --> 01:12:06.880] I mean, it's a civil side. [01:12:06.880 --> 01:12:08.880] It's in USC Blackboard 2. [01:12:08.880 --> 01:12:09.880] Yes. [01:12:09.880 --> 01:12:15.880] So you accuse them of official misconduct under the fed, [01:12:15.880 --> 01:12:23.880] but that essentially tells them that you're preparing a 1983 suit. [01:12:23.880 --> 01:12:29.880] It tells them without telling them. [01:12:29.880 --> 01:12:34.880] So what they think, what you say can be alive, [01:12:34.880 --> 01:12:39.880] what they think is going to be true to them. [01:12:39.880 --> 01:12:40.880] Yeah. [01:12:40.880 --> 01:12:47.880] Well, I was hoping for a way to backdoor getting the information I'm not getting from the state, [01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:54.880] notably the policies, practices, and procedures documented, [01:12:54.880 --> 01:12:58.880] because as you stated in one of our conversations, [01:12:58.880 --> 01:13:06.880] you have an interest in doing this debt collection in the same way you're doing the traffic. [01:13:06.880 --> 01:13:11.880] And it strikes me as the more data that you have available [01:13:11.880 --> 01:13:16.880] as to what their official policies and procedures are the better. [01:13:16.880 --> 01:13:17.880] Absolutely. [01:13:17.880 --> 01:13:25.880] And then we can ask questions that go directly to policies and procedures. [01:13:25.880 --> 01:13:32.880] And things like the thesis system, which I saw a reference to, [01:13:32.880 --> 01:13:36.880] but it was like, all right, what is that? [01:13:36.880 --> 01:13:42.880] It's mentioned in one particular set of pleadings about the thesis system. [01:13:42.880 --> 01:13:48.880] They're computerized note-taking system whenever they interact with the customer. [01:13:48.880 --> 01:13:53.880] Good. [01:13:53.880 --> 01:13:57.880] Computerized note-taking. [01:13:57.880 --> 01:14:03.880] That means they record their clients. [01:14:03.880 --> 01:14:15.880] Certainly has that, when you call, they certainly say calls are recorded for quality assurance purposes. [01:14:15.880 --> 01:14:22.880] So yeah, that's probably built in there. [01:14:22.880 --> 01:14:27.880] So if you do the same thing, they have no grounds for objection. [01:14:27.880 --> 01:14:33.880] And the only state I know of where you have to give notice, [01:14:33.880 --> 01:14:38.880] where you are a party to the conversation is Pennsylvania. [01:14:38.880 --> 01:14:40.880] Okay. [01:14:40.880 --> 01:14:45.880] I thought California was a notice state. [01:14:45.880 --> 01:14:47.880] Maybe they've changed. [01:14:47.880 --> 01:14:48.880] Okay. [01:14:48.880 --> 01:14:53.880] Well, only if one party is aware that's enough. [01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:58.880] If neither party is aware, as far as I know, in every state, that's illegal. [01:14:58.880 --> 01:14:59.880] All right. [01:14:59.880 --> 01:15:04.880] Or if you're in a restaurant or something at the next table and you're talking loud enough I can hear you, [01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:08.880] then you have no expectation of privacy. [01:15:08.880 --> 01:15:14.880] But if you're on a cell phone or a telephone or some private communication media, [01:15:14.880 --> 01:15:18.880] then you have expectation of privacy. [01:15:18.880 --> 01:15:22.880] All right. [01:15:22.880 --> 01:15:26.880] Well, you have anything else for us today? [01:15:26.880 --> 01:15:35.880] No, no, I've just got to start knitting everything together and, you know, [01:15:35.880 --> 01:15:48.880] sending my 21-day countdown so I can then file the motions to have things, the sanctions, [01:15:48.880 --> 01:15:55.880] the motion for sanctions against the attorney because he gets 21 days. [01:15:55.880 --> 01:15:59.880] 21 days for what? [01:15:59.880 --> 01:16:05.880] Apparently to look at it, respond and possibly correct the problem. [01:16:05.880 --> 01:16:08.880] It's the way Wisconsin's code's written. [01:16:08.880 --> 01:16:10.880] Wait, I missed something. [01:16:10.880 --> 01:16:13.880] What problem? [01:16:13.880 --> 01:16:20.880] Well, when you are asking for sanctions, apparently the state wants to give the lawyer an opportunity [01:16:20.880 --> 01:16:26.880] to correct the problem that you're wanting them to be sanctioned for. [01:16:26.880 --> 01:16:29.880] And so you give them 21-day notice. [01:16:29.880 --> 01:16:30.880] Oh, okay. [01:16:30.880 --> 01:16:33.880] And before you can submit your sanction to the court. [01:16:33.880 --> 01:16:34.880] Oh, okay. [01:16:34.880 --> 01:16:38.880] I missed that you were referring to sanctions. [01:16:38.880 --> 01:16:40.880] Okay. [01:16:40.880 --> 01:16:41.880] All right. [01:16:41.880 --> 01:16:44.880] Well, can you move on to your other crawlers? [01:16:44.880 --> 01:16:45.880] Okay. [01:16:45.880 --> 01:16:46.880] Thank you, Mark. [01:16:46.880 --> 01:16:47.880] Okay. [01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:50.880] Now we're going to go to Brett in Texas. [01:16:50.880 --> 01:16:51.880] Hello, Brett. [01:16:51.880 --> 01:16:53.880] Let's hold on. [01:16:53.880 --> 01:16:55.880] Let me get the one there. [01:16:55.880 --> 01:16:56.880] There we go. [01:16:56.880 --> 01:16:57.880] Okay. [01:16:57.880 --> 01:17:22.880] I love logos. [01:17:22.880 --> 01:17:27.880] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies [01:17:27.880 --> 01:17:28.880] or holiday gifts. [01:17:28.880 --> 01:17:30.880] The first thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:17:30.880 --> 01:17:33.880] Now go to LogosRegulatework.com. [01:17:33.880 --> 01:17:36.880] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:17:36.880 --> 01:17:42.880] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:43.880] Do I pay extra? [01:17:43.880 --> 01:17:44.880] No. [01:17:44.880 --> 01:17:46.880] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [01:17:46.880 --> 01:17:47.880] No. [01:17:47.880 --> 01:17:48.880] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:17:48.880 --> 01:17:49.880] No. [01:17:49.880 --> 01:17:50.880] I mean, yes. [01:17:50.880 --> 01:17:52.880] Wow. [01:17:52.880 --> 01:17:54.880] Giving without doing anything or spending any money. [01:17:54.880 --> 01:17:55.880] This is perfect. [01:17:55.880 --> 01:17:56.880] Thank you so much. [01:17:56.880 --> 01:17:58.880] We are welcome. [01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:00.880] Happy holidays, Logos. [01:18:00.880 --> 01:18:05.880] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:18:05.880 --> 01:18:09.880] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. [01:18:09.880 --> 01:18:14.880] Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [01:18:14.880 --> 01:18:20.880] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [01:18:20.880 --> 01:18:24.880] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [01:18:24.880 --> 01:18:26.880] How to answer letters and phone calls. [01:18:26.880 --> 01:18:28.880] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:18:28.880 --> 01:18:33.880] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:18:33.880 --> 01:18:38.880] The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:18:38.880 --> 01:18:40.880] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:18:40.880 --> 01:18:46.880] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner, [01:18:46.880 --> 01:18:49.880] or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. [01:18:49.880 --> 01:18:57.880] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. [01:18:57.880 --> 01:19:23.880] Learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:19:23.880 --> 01:19:32.880] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton Rule of Law Radio, and on this 30th day of March, 2018, [01:19:32.880 --> 01:19:35.880] and we're talking to Brett in Texas. [01:19:35.880 --> 01:19:41.880] Okay, Brett, what do you have for us today? [01:19:41.880 --> 01:19:52.880] Well, I have a whole lot of things on my mind, and I think I've distilled down one question that might be helpful to everybody, [01:19:52.880 --> 01:19:57.880] certainly to me, but you've always said that when we are in the trial court, [01:19:57.880 --> 01:20:03.880] we shouldn't expect to win in the trial court, we're just making our record for appeal, [01:20:03.880 --> 01:20:07.880] and that the appeals court is where we really need to be aiming for. [01:20:07.880 --> 01:20:13.880] So, I think there's a weak spot in between there. [01:20:13.880 --> 01:20:20.880] I hit it with a couple of different cases here with this driving law license invalid nonsense, [01:20:20.880 --> 01:20:28.880] and it comes when the trial court does everything we expect them to do and rule against us out of hand [01:20:28.880 --> 01:20:34.880] and categorically deny an overrule and blow off everything that the law commands, [01:20:34.880 --> 01:20:38.880] and then we need to take our paperwork and go to the appeals court. [01:20:38.880 --> 01:20:43.880] But what if they're not providing us the paperwork that we have to have to get there? [01:20:43.880 --> 01:20:52.880] We have to take a judgment document, and we have to have a mobile findings of fact and conclusions of law [01:20:52.880 --> 01:20:55.880] so that we know how to write the brief for the appeal court. [01:20:55.880 --> 01:20:57.880] Okay, hold on, hold on. [01:20:57.880 --> 01:21:04.880] In a traffic court, is this traffic court a court of records? [01:21:04.880 --> 01:21:05.880] Yes. [01:21:05.880 --> 01:21:06.880] Okay. [01:21:06.880 --> 01:21:13.880] I've got two rules right now that are kind of doing the same thing, one's county and one's municipal. [01:21:13.880 --> 01:21:21.880] I was saying something last night that makes it look like there's findings of fact and conclusions of law, [01:21:21.880 --> 01:21:29.880] but municipal people don't have any kind of, they're not compelled to do that. [01:21:29.880 --> 01:21:35.880] Right, 297 specifically addresses county and district courts. [01:21:35.880 --> 01:21:40.880] And that's because these statutes presumed that they were not courts of record. [01:21:40.880 --> 01:21:49.880] I'm going to say if it's court of record, then you have a right to it. [01:21:49.880 --> 01:21:56.880] Even though 297 doesn't command them to do it, if they don't do it, [01:21:56.880 --> 01:22:05.880] and you can show that the judge failed to determine the facts in accordance to the rule of the evidence and apply the laws that comes to him to the facts in the case, [01:22:05.880 --> 01:22:11.880] then you can claim that the court denied you and due process. [01:22:11.880 --> 01:22:16.880] And the way I read the penal code, that's crime in the state of Texas. [01:22:16.880 --> 01:22:27.880] The judge filed official question against the district judge in Wise County for failing to produce findings of fact and conclusions of law. [01:22:27.880 --> 01:22:33.880] And it didn't matter about 297, we used 297, but we'd have done it anyway, [01:22:33.880 --> 01:22:47.880] because the judge has a duty to determine the facts and apply the law if he fails to do so. [01:22:47.880 --> 01:22:49.880] Now they say you can appeal. [01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:50.880] Yeah, we can. [01:22:50.880 --> 01:22:55.880] We can appeal to a grand jury to indict. [01:22:55.880 --> 01:23:00.880] So if it's a municipal court, I suggest you do that. [01:23:00.880 --> 01:23:08.880] If it's a county court, then you do the request for findings of fact. [01:23:08.880 --> 01:23:15.880] As a practice, it is a good idea when you're creating pleadings. [01:23:15.880 --> 01:23:21.880] Always create your pleadings based on facts and law. [01:23:21.880 --> 01:23:33.880] And while you're creating your pleadings, you might also create points and authorities, because you actually need those to effectively build your pleadings. [01:23:33.880 --> 01:23:38.880] You need the facts and the law in which you're basing your pleadings. [01:23:38.880 --> 01:23:51.880] So then when you request finding the facts and conclusions at law, you take your points and authorities and expand those to include what went on with the court and show what went wrong, [01:23:51.880 --> 01:24:05.880] what the judge did wrong, and state how the judge should have ruled and the law in support of that, and ask the court to accept your findings of fact and conclusions at law or preparatory zone. [01:24:05.880 --> 01:24:13.880] In our last filing, I didn't do that. I was just out of time, but I should have. [01:24:13.880 --> 01:24:25.880] Okay, what this does for you is it gives you a real leg up when it comes time to appeal, because you'll have almost all your work done already. [01:24:25.880 --> 01:24:27.880] Okay, go ahead. [01:24:27.880 --> 01:24:35.880] So what do you do? How do you... [01:24:35.880 --> 01:24:37.880] I'm sorry? [01:24:37.880 --> 01:24:41.880] Getting distorted, really. Try that again. [01:24:41.880 --> 01:24:43.880] I'm sorry, I can't hear you. [01:24:43.880 --> 01:24:49.880] I said you were getting distorted really bad, so it just sounded better now. Go ahead. [01:24:49.880 --> 01:25:11.880] Okay, so what's a good angle to take? How do you pull out the big guns and make something go to the appeals court when the appeals court doesn't have the necessary documents in front of them because the lower court is preventing on purpose? [01:25:11.880 --> 01:25:21.880] They know that you've made a good record for appeal, and they know it's going to be egg on the face, and so they're coming up with all kinds of creative ways to keep the appeal from happening. [01:25:21.880 --> 01:25:25.880] Yeah, that's okay. I'll criminalize them. [01:25:25.880 --> 01:25:27.880] But they don't... [01:25:27.880 --> 01:25:33.880] You've got a criminal complaint, and you've got a judicial conduct complaint. You've got the barber even. [01:25:33.880 --> 01:25:37.880] You still have the guilty verdict. [01:25:37.880 --> 01:25:51.880] Yeah, and then you go to... I don't have the statute memorized, but from a municipal or JP court and a... [01:25:51.880 --> 01:26:07.880] Okay, what the case law says, essentially some case law on this, and it says that a remedy for a judge who fails to properly apply the law to the facts is an extraordinary writ. [01:26:07.880 --> 01:26:21.880] And from a municipal court, an extraordinary writ is petitioned to the county court. From the county court, an extraordinary writ, writ of mandamus. [01:26:21.880 --> 01:26:29.880] Rit of mandamus, you ask a higher court to order a lower court to do what the law requires them to do. [01:26:29.880 --> 01:26:41.880] So you ask the county court for a writ of mandamus in the municipal court. You ask the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus in the county court. [01:26:41.880 --> 01:26:49.880] It's always the court to whom you would file an appeal. That's the next court in the pecking order. [01:26:49.880 --> 01:26:51.880] Right. [01:26:51.880 --> 01:27:01.880] The county or district court is the court of appeals. JP or municipal is the county court. So you ask them for a writ of mandamus. [01:27:01.880 --> 01:27:13.880] And if they refuse, then you move from your file of plea and abatement and an interlocutory appeal with the court of appeals. [01:27:13.880 --> 01:27:27.880] They try that out, guys, and then you do this a conduct complaint to judge. You file the criminally against the judge because you have a right to a writ of mandamus and he denied it. [01:27:27.880 --> 01:27:30.880] Oh, you're talking about the appellate court. [01:27:30.880 --> 01:27:32.880] Yeah. [01:27:32.880 --> 01:27:44.880] Well, if it's a county court who's the appellate court and that's the case in municipal JP, then you have a right to the mandamus. [01:27:44.880 --> 01:27:50.880] He can refuse to do it, but you can charge him criminally for denying you due process. [01:27:50.880 --> 01:27:52.880] Mm-hmm. [01:27:52.880 --> 01:27:54.880] Yeah, he likes that. [01:27:54.880 --> 01:27:59.880] That's the criminal complaint being the big gun, sounds like. [01:27:59.880 --> 01:28:06.880] Exactly. Because that's going to scare them. They're not, they're not likely to tell you, but it is. [01:28:06.880 --> 01:28:10.880] Because they're going to run to the prosecutor and say, can he do that? [01:28:10.880 --> 01:28:16.880] And if the prosecutor knows what he's doing, he's going to say, yes, he can do that. [01:28:16.880 --> 01:28:23.880] And the prosecutor probably tell him, well, don't worry about it. I won't let anything happen. Then you go after the prosecutor. [01:28:23.880 --> 01:28:31.880] Right. Who's going to protect the prosecutor? What's the district judge? Then you go after the district judge. [01:28:31.880 --> 01:28:38.880] I've got so many of these people tied up with each other's criminal complaints, but I don't see any action happening. [01:28:38.880 --> 01:29:07.880] I mean, today I filed one with a Rockwall County DA and accused to be one of the Dallas County criminal district court judges of not handling the felonies and high-level misdemeanors that have been reported to him. [01:29:07.880 --> 01:29:20.880] And those were reported to him from Richardson. Well, so I mentioned in there that we've got 70, 70 felonies and high-level misdemeanors happening in Richardson. [01:29:20.880 --> 01:29:30.880] And he had a duty to address those. And now he's shielding from prosecution, which actually puts him in the category of a criminal with no authority. [01:29:30.880 --> 01:29:38.880] And he's got the impersonating of public official. And I sent all that over to Rockwall for them to deal with him. [01:29:38.880 --> 01:29:42.880] I don't know. I don't see action happening. Yes. [01:29:42.880 --> 01:29:44.880] Okay. Hang on. [01:29:44.880 --> 01:29:46.880] Left and right. [01:29:46.880 --> 01:30:01.880] Randy Kelton with a radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [01:30:01.880 --> 01:30:06.880] Jabber, jabber, jabber. It's the sound of people talking about other people. [01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:10.880] Valsipping around the water cooler is an age-old tradition, but is it really okay? [01:30:10.880 --> 01:30:14.880] Dr. Kaffir and Albright, I'll tell you more in just a moment. [01:30:14.880 --> 01:30:19.880] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:19.880 --> 01:30:24.880] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:24.880 --> 01:30:32.880] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:32.880 --> 01:30:40.880] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:40.880 --> 01:30:43.880] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:43.880 --> 01:30:45.880] Gossip is more than just idle talk. [01:30:45.880 --> 01:30:52.880] A study by Northeastern University proves that negative chit chat actually changes the way we view the person who's defamed. [01:30:52.880 --> 01:30:58.880] Volunteers viewed images of neutral human faces paired with neutral, positive, or negative gossip. [01:30:58.880 --> 01:31:03.880] When shown an image associated with negative comments like she stole money, [01:31:03.880 --> 01:31:08.880] volunteers spent much more time studying the person's face than they did the other faces. [01:31:08.880 --> 01:31:15.880] Researchers believe the change in the visual perception of people associated with negative gossip is a protection mechanism. [01:31:15.880 --> 01:31:20.880] It helps us steer clear of people with a reputation for lying, cheating, or harming others. [01:31:20.880 --> 01:31:25.880] Look after Catherine Albright to more news and information at CatherineAlbright.com. [01:31:30.880 --> 01:31:35.880] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:35.880 --> 01:31:37.880] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:37.880 --> 01:31:42.880] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:42.880 --> 01:31:45.880] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, [01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:48.880] and thousands of my fellow force responders have died. [01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:49.880] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:49.880 --> 01:31:50.880] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:52.880] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:53.880] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.880 --> 01:31:54.880] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:54.880 --> 01:31:57.880] We are Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.880 --> 01:32:00.880] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.880 --> 01:32:02.880] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:02.880 --> 01:32:05.880] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:05.880 --> 01:32:08.880] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, [01:32:08.880 --> 01:32:10.880] but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:10.880 --> 01:32:12.880] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, [01:32:12.880 --> 01:32:13.880] but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:13.880 --> 01:32:15.880] That's why you have insurance, [01:32:15.880 --> 01:32:18.880] and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you [01:32:18.880 --> 01:32:20.880] with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:20.880 --> 01:32:23.880] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member [01:32:23.880 --> 01:32:26.880] of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:26.880 --> 01:32:29.880] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim [01:32:29.880 --> 01:32:31.880] and your roof right the first time. [01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:35.880] Just call 512-992-8745 [01:32:35.880 --> 01:32:37.880] or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:37.880 --> 01:32:40.880] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, [01:32:40.880 --> 01:32:43.880] and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network [01:32:43.880 --> 01:32:44.880] to help continue this programming. [01:32:44.880 --> 01:32:47.880] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, [01:32:47.880 --> 01:32:49.880] your door should be locked in. [01:32:49.880 --> 01:32:53.880] That's 512-992-8745 [01:32:53.880 --> 01:32:55.880] or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:55.880 --> 01:32:58.880] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.880 --> 01:33:01.880] We're not actually kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:02.880 --> 01:33:04.880] Looking for some truth? [01:33:04.880 --> 01:33:29.880] If you found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:29.880 --> 01:33:31.880] Okay, we are back. [01:33:31.880 --> 01:33:36.880] Welcome to LogosRadio, and we're talking to Brett in Texas. [01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:43.880] Okay, Brett, you have filed against the original actors, [01:33:43.880 --> 01:33:45.880] and now you've filed against the judge [01:33:45.880 --> 01:33:47.880] with whom you filed the complaints. [01:33:47.880 --> 01:33:49.880] Am I correct on that? [01:33:49.880 --> 01:33:54.880] Yes, filed against the prosecutor, [01:33:54.880 --> 01:33:56.880] criminal complaints against, [01:33:56.880 --> 01:33:57.880] and we've got barter events too, [01:33:57.880 --> 01:34:00.880] criminal complaints against the arresting officer, [01:34:00.880 --> 01:34:02.880] against the judge, [01:34:02.880 --> 01:34:04.880] against two of the judges actually. [01:34:04.880 --> 01:34:08.880] They did a switcheroo when one of them got disqualified. [01:34:08.880 --> 01:34:10.880] The second judge decided that he didn't care [01:34:10.880 --> 01:34:12.880] if he was disqualified or not. [01:34:12.880 --> 01:34:14.880] He was just going to bluster ahead, [01:34:14.880 --> 01:34:17.880] and I told him, [01:34:17.880 --> 01:34:20.880] I'm going to an interlocutory appeal, [01:34:20.880 --> 01:34:22.880] and he says, denied. [01:34:22.880 --> 01:34:24.880] And I said, your honor, [01:34:24.880 --> 01:34:27.880] you don't have the authority to hear an interlocutory appeal. [01:34:27.880 --> 01:34:30.880] And he says, denied. [01:34:30.880 --> 01:34:35.880] Just one thing after another. [01:34:35.880 --> 01:34:37.880] But then at the end of the day, [01:34:37.880 --> 01:34:40.880] he put out a KPS warrant for my arrest [01:34:40.880 --> 01:34:43.880] because he wanted me to pay the fine. [01:34:43.880 --> 01:34:45.880] So how do I deal with this? [01:34:45.880 --> 01:34:46.880] How do I go to a... [01:34:46.880 --> 01:34:47.880] Wait a minute. [01:34:47.880 --> 01:34:48.880] At the end of the day? [01:34:48.880 --> 01:34:50.880] He appeals. [01:34:50.880 --> 01:34:51.880] Hold on. [01:34:51.880 --> 01:34:52.880] At the end of the day? [01:34:52.880 --> 01:34:54.880] At the end of the day. [01:34:54.880 --> 01:34:56.880] I mean figuratively. [01:34:56.880 --> 01:34:57.880] No, no, no. [01:34:57.880 --> 01:34:58.880] Hold on. [01:34:58.880 --> 01:34:59.880] The reason I asked that [01:34:59.880 --> 01:35:04.880] is you have 10 days before you do anything. [01:35:04.880 --> 01:35:11.880] So does he ask before 10 days? [01:35:11.880 --> 01:35:12.880] No, he didn't. [01:35:12.880 --> 01:35:15.880] He didn't put out the KPS warrant yet. [01:35:15.880 --> 01:35:18.880] He just threatened it. [01:35:18.880 --> 01:35:19.880] Oh, okay. [01:35:19.880 --> 01:35:25.880] Then have you given him notice of intent to appeal? [01:35:25.880 --> 01:35:26.880] Yes. [01:35:26.880 --> 01:35:27.880] Okay. [01:35:27.880 --> 01:35:29.880] Did you file a bail form? [01:35:29.880 --> 01:35:32.880] No, I don't know what that is. [01:35:32.880 --> 01:35:34.880] Okay. [01:35:34.880 --> 01:35:37.880] Bond is an option. [01:35:37.880 --> 01:35:39.880] Bail is a right. [01:35:39.880 --> 01:35:41.880] Bail is a promise. [01:35:41.880 --> 01:35:42.880] Send me an email. [01:35:42.880 --> 01:35:44.880] I'll send you a copy of one. [01:35:44.880 --> 01:35:45.880] Bail... [01:35:45.880 --> 01:35:48.880] It's a copy of one I got from Highland Park. [01:35:48.880 --> 01:35:50.880] You may have to make a few changes. [01:35:50.880 --> 01:35:55.880] It's a HTML document. [01:35:55.880 --> 01:35:58.880] I think I turned it into a fill in the blanks. [01:35:58.880 --> 01:36:01.880] If I didn't, remind me and I'll do that. [01:36:01.880 --> 01:36:03.880] It had Highland Park on it, [01:36:03.880 --> 01:36:06.880] but I can take that out and fix it. [01:36:06.880 --> 01:36:08.880] It's a fill in the blank document. [01:36:08.880 --> 01:36:12.880] You get two charities and that's Bail. [01:36:12.880 --> 01:36:14.880] And that's constitutional rights. [01:36:14.880 --> 01:36:16.880] You don't have to put any money. [01:36:16.880 --> 01:36:20.880] And all you have to do is tell them that you're a resident of the county [01:36:20.880 --> 01:36:29.880] and you're worth at least double the amount of the fine exclusive of all encumbrances. [01:36:29.880 --> 01:36:32.880] And for this kind of thing, that's easy enough. [01:36:32.880 --> 01:36:38.880] You don't have to put any money. [01:36:38.880 --> 01:36:39.880] Okay. [01:36:39.880 --> 01:36:41.880] Exclusion of all encumbrances. [01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:47.880] And then you make sure you go after them. [01:36:47.880 --> 01:36:51.880] You might send a tort letter to the city. [01:36:51.880 --> 01:36:56.880] And okay, you've done the bar grievance and you just do this a conduct complaint. [01:36:56.880 --> 01:37:06.880] Make sure you file complaints against the judge for exerting or reporting to exerting authority he did not expressly have. [01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:08.880] Yes. [01:37:08.880 --> 01:37:12.880] You give notice of appeal and he denied your appeal. [01:37:12.880 --> 01:37:16.880] That's exerting or reporting to exerting authority he doesn't expressly have. [01:37:16.880 --> 01:37:24.880] And under 37.11 Texas penal code, that's felony in Texas. [01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:25.880] Mm-hmm. [01:37:25.880 --> 01:37:31.880] That's why that went on smart guy. [01:37:31.880 --> 01:37:38.880] Okay, what you said was earlier is that you didn't hear anything from them. [01:37:38.880 --> 01:37:41.880] You didn't hear anything happening as a result of it. [01:37:41.880 --> 01:37:44.880] You're not going to. [01:37:44.880 --> 01:37:52.880] Because they're going to do everything they can to make you think that what you've done is meaningless and worthless. [01:37:52.880 --> 01:37:53.880] Okay. [01:37:53.880 --> 01:37:59.880] They do not want you to know how much problems this causes them. [01:37:59.880 --> 01:38:02.880] So just keep filing. [01:38:02.880 --> 01:38:06.880] Keep raising the bar. [01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:25.880] And, you know, in any political structure, as you move up the chain of command and get the chain of command in trouble over the guy at the bottom, the chain of command is really, really not happy with the guy at the bottom. [01:38:25.880 --> 01:38:32.880] And you can go all the way up to the Chief Justice of the Supreme of the State Supreme Court. [01:38:32.880 --> 01:38:41.880] The 2.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure titled, Who Are Magistrates? [01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:48.880] First one, Justices of the Supreme Court. [01:38:48.880 --> 01:39:05.880] Justices of the Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellate Court Judges, District Judges, County Judges, Municipal Judges, and County Recorders, and Mayors and Recorders. [01:39:05.880 --> 01:39:08.880] Never did figure out what Recorders means. [01:39:08.880 --> 01:39:13.880] I think it means a clerk, but that's never used. [01:39:13.880 --> 01:39:19.880] All of the judges are magistrates, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme. [01:39:19.880 --> 01:39:25.880] And I have sent criminal complaints to him and had great fun at his expense. [01:39:25.880 --> 01:39:28.880] And never heard a word from them. [01:39:28.880 --> 01:39:41.880] When I filed criminal charges against the Court of Criminal Appeals judges and got them put before a grand jury, I never heard one word. [01:39:41.880 --> 01:39:44.880] I went to the grand jury. [01:39:44.880 --> 01:39:51.880] Because I found out it went in front of the grand jury because I stepped right in the middle of the prosecutor. [01:39:51.880 --> 01:39:59.880] And I was telling her that I was going to file criminal charges against her in a petition for rid of mandamus. [01:39:59.880 --> 01:40:02.880] And she told me she had given them to the grand jury. [01:40:02.880 --> 01:40:07.880] But had I not done that, I would not have heard a word. [01:40:07.880 --> 01:40:12.880] Justice. Because they're not going to give you any feedback. [01:40:12.880 --> 01:40:14.880] But that's okay. [01:40:14.880 --> 01:40:18.880] Because we get to use that. [01:40:18.880 --> 01:40:25.880] I get to come down there and hop up and down and rail in righteousness and indignation. [01:40:25.880 --> 01:40:37.880] They're better to do it through letters than any time you ask a question concerning what they're required to do. [01:40:37.880 --> 01:40:42.880] And they don't tell you that they did what they're required to do. [01:40:42.880 --> 01:40:49.880] It is a reasonable presumption that they didn't do what they were required to do. [01:40:49.880 --> 01:40:51.880] Exactly. [01:40:51.880 --> 01:40:58.880] The way you move ahead is if they didn't do it. If they did it, let them prove it up. [01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:03.880] So they don't want to respond. That works for me. [01:41:03.880 --> 01:41:05.880] Okay. [01:41:05.880 --> 01:41:13.880] That's part of a real hard to wrap your head around until you've been through this fight, time or two. [01:41:13.880 --> 01:41:19.880] The second time you go into one of these fights, once you've really worked them over, [01:41:19.880 --> 01:41:24.880] then you'll see these guys ducking and dodging and taking a whole different tactic here. [01:41:24.880 --> 01:41:28.880] And that's when you know what you did the first time worked. [01:41:28.880 --> 01:41:41.880] Well, they arrested me in Williamson County when I called 911 to get them to arrest the district attorney and district judge. [01:41:41.880 --> 01:41:50.880] And when they were processing me out of jail, the jailer said, now, Mr. Kelton, [01:41:50.880 --> 01:41:55.880] you know we didn't have anything to do with this. We're just doing our jobs. [01:41:55.880 --> 01:42:06.880] I said, but there's a one restricting me at my rights, but if that's my job, I didn't do anything to do with it. [01:42:06.880 --> 01:42:10.880] They could not get me out of there fast enough. [01:42:10.880 --> 01:42:18.880] And I said, I know when the chief found out that these two cops had arrested me, they said, you did what? [01:42:18.880 --> 01:42:24.880] I could not get Williamson County to bring me to trial on that. [01:42:24.880 --> 01:42:33.880] I insisted. I jumped up and down and railed in righteous indignation and they absolutely refused. [01:42:33.880 --> 01:42:38.880] That's what happens the second time around. [01:42:38.880 --> 01:42:44.880] You've got to get through the first time. They're not anywhere near done yet. [01:42:44.880 --> 01:42:50.880] They're making these claims, but they denied due process so that disqualifies the prosecution. [01:42:50.880 --> 01:42:58.880] They don't have a 16.17 order and we are building support for that. [01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:09.880] I have some folks in Texas that are going to hire me to take on Tarrant County. [01:43:09.880 --> 01:43:21.880] And I guess I can say that they're bondsmen, but the purpose of taking them on is the examining trial issue. [01:43:21.880 --> 01:43:28.880] So we have people interested in this issue other than just us process. [01:43:28.880 --> 01:43:31.880] And I'm getting other people interested. [01:43:31.880 --> 01:43:39.880] And I've talked to some trial attorneys and they like the argument that we will have attorneys behind this as well. [01:43:39.880 --> 01:43:42.880] We may actually get this done. [01:43:42.880 --> 01:43:44.880] Hang on. About to go to break. [01:43:44.880 --> 01:43:53.880] We'll be right back. [01:44:14.880 --> 01:44:24.880] We'll be right back. [01:44:44.880 --> 01:44:59.880] We'll be right back. [01:45:15.880 --> 01:45:19.880] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.880 --> 01:45:23.880] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.880 --> 01:45:26.880] Thousands have won with our step by step course. [01:45:26.880 --> 01:45:28.880] And now you can too. [01:45:28.880 --> 01:45:34.880] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [01:45:34.880 --> 01:45:43.880] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.880 --> 01:45:52.880] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro safe tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.880 --> 01:46:21.880] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:22.880 --> 01:46:32.880] Thank you. [01:46:52.880 --> 01:47:02.880] Okay, we are back. [01:47:02.880 --> 01:47:07.880] Randy Kelsen, we're at rule of law radio and we're talking to Brett in Texas. [01:47:07.880 --> 01:47:14.880] Okay, Brett, where were we? [01:47:14.880 --> 01:47:23.880] We brought up some good information. You were talking about that the criminal complaints really do have an effect. You just say don't let us know about it. [01:47:23.880 --> 01:47:31.880] And you were saying that we can go to the Chief Justice with this because he's a magistrate too. [01:47:31.880 --> 01:47:37.880] We can go to the Chief Justice of the Supreme and say, here's some criminal complaints. [01:47:37.880 --> 01:47:53.880] And I don't quite know exactly what I can do about making the appeal happen, but I guess I don't have to worry about that too much as long as I'm keeping them busy with as long as I stay on top of it with criminal complaints, I suppose. [01:47:53.880 --> 01:48:11.880] But their problem is you can appeal always to the U.S. Supreme. This little traffic ticket, you can appeal it all the way to the U.S. Supreme. [01:48:11.880 --> 01:48:25.880] So it'll be four or five years before they can get there. And most likely it's going to go away before it gets there. Talk to Scott Richardson, he'll tell you about that. [01:48:25.880 --> 01:48:32.880] He got a number of tickets the same way. And he didn't go to jail. They all went bye-bye. [01:48:32.880 --> 01:48:34.880] He didn't. [01:48:34.880 --> 01:48:44.880] He got arrested when he got the tickets, but he got back out and then he fought them and they're all gone. [01:48:44.880 --> 01:48:47.880] Okay. [01:48:47.880 --> 01:48:54.880] So you start turning the crank up on them and well, one of them got convicted on and they gave him no time. [01:48:54.880 --> 01:49:02.880] And I think just a piton's token fine because they didn't want him to appeal. [01:49:02.880 --> 01:49:05.880] And that was Rockwall. [01:49:05.880 --> 01:49:06.880] Yeah. [01:49:06.880 --> 01:49:09.880] Oh, he beat him up big time. [01:49:09.880 --> 01:49:18.880] The prosecutor refused to tell him his name because he didn't want to get bar grieved. [01:49:18.880 --> 01:49:29.880] He bar grieved. He bar grieved. He said he bar grieved the first one into the Stone Age and the second one wouldn't reveal his name. [01:49:29.880 --> 01:49:35.880] So that's when you know you're stinging them. [01:49:35.880 --> 01:49:42.880] The last cop that wrote him a ticket, he filed suit the next day or two days later. [01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:50.880] He filed a bunch of complaints the first day, a bunch of documents, and then the next day he filed suit. [01:49:50.880 --> 01:49:57.880] So what do you think? The chief is going to tell his officers. [01:49:57.880 --> 01:50:02.880] The same thing that Sheriff told the deputies in the county I live in. [01:50:02.880 --> 01:50:13.880] Don't you dare write him no ticket and whatever you do, don't put that SOB in my jail. [01:50:13.880 --> 01:50:17.880] So the police really don't like it when you come back after them. [01:50:17.880 --> 01:50:25.880] And if you talk to Scott about the judicial, I mean the professional conduct complaints, the TECOS complaints. [01:50:25.880 --> 01:50:33.880] The three police officers, he filed those against the next time he called the first two of God. [01:50:33.880 --> 01:50:41.880] Now he can't be sure they quit because of that, but we sure like to think they did. [01:50:41.880 --> 01:50:45.880] Because professional conduct complaint to these guys is a big deal. [01:50:45.880 --> 01:50:50.880] And that's when they find out that we know their Achilles heel. [01:50:50.880 --> 01:51:00.880] That's when they get excited, the bar grievance. We just got a judicial conduct complaint against a district judge for not providing findings of fact and conclusions at law. [01:51:00.880 --> 01:51:06.880] He may, he had another 10 days, but I think his second 10 days are up. [01:51:06.880 --> 01:51:11.880] Because when you request they got 20 days. [01:51:11.880 --> 01:51:20.880] But the code said the judge shall produce findings of fact and conclusions at law within 20 days. [01:51:20.880 --> 01:51:25.880] Did not say, may, might, or can if he wants to. [01:51:25.880 --> 01:51:37.880] And then if he doesn't, your remedy is, or your civil remedy is to file a notice of late findings. [01:51:37.880 --> 01:51:45.880] But the way I read the code, he had 20 days. The fact that you have a remedy is irrelevant. [01:51:45.880 --> 01:51:55.880] It's like saying, you can't write me a ticket for running that stop sign because I stopped halfway down the block. [01:51:55.880 --> 01:52:03.880] Well, duh, once the 20th day passed, the bell had been rung. [01:52:03.880 --> 01:52:09.880] So he committed the crime. That's the way I read it. [01:52:09.880 --> 01:52:16.880] So we filed on him and I'm sure he just got the judicial conduct complaint. This guy just got appointed as a judge. [01:52:16.880 --> 01:52:28.880] The first thing he gets is a criminal complaint against him. I bet he didn't see that coming. [01:52:28.880 --> 01:52:35.880] Some of these people are running for office right now. Some of them are trying to get elected or re-elected. [01:52:35.880 --> 01:52:38.880] So it might be a particularly sensitive time for them. [01:52:38.880 --> 01:52:44.880] Get a hold of whoever's running against him. [01:52:44.880 --> 01:52:47.880] And tell them this guy was such a... [01:52:47.880 --> 01:52:49.880] What's the criminal complaint? [01:52:49.880 --> 01:52:53.880] Yeah, I filed criminal charges against him. [01:52:53.880 --> 01:52:59.880] They're before the courts right now and he gets to use that against this guy. [01:52:59.880 --> 01:53:13.880] And what the guy's going to say is, when he brings us up in a debate, is it true that people who've been before you have felt so mistreated that they filed criminal charges against you for your behavior in court? [01:53:13.880 --> 01:53:24.880] Oh, well, that was just a sour grapes. And they were just angry because they didn't get the ruling they wanted. [01:53:24.880 --> 01:53:26.880] Yeah, maybe. [01:53:26.880 --> 01:53:35.880] But at the end of the day, perceptions everything. And people think, where there's smoke. [01:53:35.880 --> 01:53:40.880] Good luck, smart guy. [01:53:40.880 --> 01:53:49.880] So at the end of the day, it's all political. And see if you can get the judge tossed. [01:53:49.880 --> 01:53:56.880] And just, you know, when I got all the high studies in Texas put in front of a grand jury, I thought it's because of me. [01:53:56.880 --> 01:54:03.880] All of my eloquent oratory and all the pressure I put on him. I didn't have anything to do with it. [01:54:03.880 --> 01:54:10.880] Ron Earl, 25 year district attorney. He's retiring, not running for office again. [01:54:10.880 --> 01:54:15.880] He's a Democrat. All nine of those judges are Republicans. [01:54:15.880 --> 01:54:24.880] That dirty Robin's calendar used my complaints as cannon fodder to try to take out all those judges with him. [01:54:24.880 --> 01:54:28.880] That was a valuable lesson for me. [01:54:28.880 --> 01:54:38.880] It's all about politics. And you know, these judges, they fear that of Garland. [01:54:38.880 --> 01:54:49.880] The judge heard me in the hall, tell the bailiff to take his chicken suit off because he refused to arrest the judge. [01:54:49.880 --> 01:54:54.880] The bailiff was walking away from me and I think his name was Douglas. [01:54:54.880 --> 01:55:00.880] Mr. Douglas, I need you to take your chicken suit off. [01:55:00.880 --> 01:55:06.880] He just froze in his tracks and he turned around real slow. [01:55:06.880 --> 01:55:14.880] Mr. Kelton, that was not called for. Yes, it was called for. You stinking coward. [01:55:14.880 --> 01:55:17.880] And David Wethy was with me. [01:55:17.880 --> 01:55:24.880] His daughter, they were heading for the door. They said they were sure that bailiff was going to shoot me. [01:55:24.880 --> 01:55:29.880] No, he's not. I was right. He knew I was right. [01:55:29.880 --> 01:55:38.880] I just put him on the dime and he didn't like it. And the judge heard us in the courtroom. [01:55:38.880 --> 01:55:42.880] Two months later, the judge retired. [01:55:42.880 --> 01:55:53.880] Now, I don't know if I had anything to do with that, but I certainly like to think that I did. [01:55:53.880 --> 01:55:58.880] This really is powerful. And they've got you under the gun. [01:55:58.880 --> 01:56:03.880] But one thing to understand, you've got five years worth of appeals on these. [01:56:03.880 --> 01:56:07.880] Once you have the appeal written for one ticket, you got it for all of them. [01:56:07.880 --> 01:56:13.880] You just change the names and dates, stamp it and file it. [01:56:13.880 --> 01:56:17.880] And you're a customer fortune. [01:56:17.880 --> 01:56:22.880] And each one you do, you'll get better. [01:56:22.880 --> 01:56:25.880] They'll do their song and dance and sell us with down your pants. [01:56:25.880 --> 01:56:32.880] And then you'll adjust for that and hit the next one. [01:56:32.880 --> 01:56:40.880] We start getting a set of tools for this purpose put together and we get lots of people doing this. [01:56:40.880 --> 01:56:44.880] The courts are just simply not going to be able to function. [01:56:44.880 --> 01:56:52.880] And we may actually get the higher court to rule on what the law says. [01:56:52.880 --> 01:56:56.880] Go ahead. [01:56:56.880 --> 01:57:01.880] I appreciate it. I'll let you get to your next callers. I appreciate your input. [01:57:01.880 --> 01:57:11.880] Okay. And tell your wife that I said she deserves better. [01:57:11.880 --> 01:57:18.880] And Brett's wife is a sweetheart. And she does keep him in line. [01:57:18.880 --> 01:57:21.880] Okay. [01:57:21.880 --> 01:57:23.880] Thank you, Brett. [01:57:23.880 --> 01:57:29.880] Okay. Now we're going to Ted in Utah. Hello, Ted. [01:57:29.880 --> 01:57:32.880] Hello, Randy. How are you tonight? [01:57:32.880 --> 01:57:37.880] I am good. I don't care what everybody says. [01:57:37.880 --> 01:57:41.880] Well, I want to give you a laugh at everybody else. [01:57:41.880 --> 01:57:45.880] I signed up for your e-book. [01:57:45.880 --> 01:57:50.880] And I waited a while. I thought I'd get an email showing me a link or something. [01:57:50.880 --> 01:57:53.880] But I'm a dinosaur. [01:57:53.880 --> 01:57:57.880] I don't know where it's at. How to find it? [01:57:57.880 --> 01:58:02.880] Well, I will talk to Deb. I think I got a note that you got there. [01:58:02.880 --> 01:58:06.880] So I'm sure she did that. If she didn't send me an email, I'll send you a copy. [01:58:06.880 --> 01:58:11.880] Actually, I will send you two copies. [01:58:11.880 --> 01:58:17.880] I'll send you the PDF copy. I'll also send you the mind map copy. [01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:21.880] I built it in a mind map. [01:58:21.880 --> 01:58:29.880] Ted, I said Ted the mind map, and at first he was frustrated with it because it took him a little bit to figure out how to use that mind map. [01:58:29.880 --> 01:58:33.880] But once he got it sorted out, he understood why I did that. [01:58:33.880 --> 01:58:39.880] Because it gives you a visual representation of all the contents. [01:58:39.880 --> 01:58:49.880] And you can jump from place to place, forward and back in a way that you can't with a flat file piece. [01:58:49.880 --> 01:58:53.880] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. [01:58:53.880 --> 01:58:57.880] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:01.880] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text. [01:59:01.880 --> 01:59:06.880] But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [01:59:06.880 --> 01:59:08.880] Enter the recovery version. [01:59:08.880 --> 01:59:12.880] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate. [01:59:12.880 --> 01:59:17.880] But the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes. [01:59:17.880 --> 01:59:21.880] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [01:59:21.880 --> 01:59:27.880] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [01:59:27.880 --> 01:59:32.880] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [01:59:32.880 --> 01:59:42.880] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [01:59:42.880 --> 01:59:49.880] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.