[00:00.000 --> 00:07.920] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown. [00:07.920 --> 00:14.080] Markets for Monday, the 8th of January, 2018, opened with gold at $1,320.02 an ounce, silver [00:14.080 --> 00:22.440] at $17.20 an ounce, Texas Crude at $61.44 a barrel, Bitcoin at $16,020.30, while Bitcoin [00:22.440 --> 00:34.920] cashed at $2,757.56, finally dash coins at $1,284.36, a crypto coin. [00:34.920 --> 00:40.680] Today in history, the year 1835, the United States government national debt is zero for [00:40.680 --> 00:45.720] the first time and presumably only time in the government's existence. Zero government [00:45.720 --> 00:50.480] debt? Today in history. [00:50.480 --> 00:54.320] For recent news, the president will undergo a two-hour physical exam which will include [00:54.320 --> 00:58.480] urine blood analysis, cardiac evaluation, and some more personal prying with sleeping [00:58.480 --> 01:02.880] habits and even his romantic life being discussed with the multi-administration presidential [01:02.880 --> 01:07.760] physician. It seems the president may be wanting to later rest, the recent lineup of criticisms [01:07.760 --> 01:11.680] questioning his mental health and stability. Apparently some of the president's more recent [01:11.680 --> 01:16.320] tweets directed towards North Korea's Kim Jong-un and the author of the book Fire and [01:16.320 --> 01:20.960] Fury, Michael Wolfe, has many thinking that the president should perhaps be more articulate [01:20.960 --> 01:23.080] and less rash with his tweets. [01:23.080 --> 01:29.920] The U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Nambaro dismissed cases against Nevada rancher Clive [01:29.920 --> 01:35.120] and Bundy, two sons and a Montana militiaman today. Judge ruled that the government's lawyers [01:35.120 --> 01:40.200] suppressed footage from several cameras that were set up by the FBI around the Bundy's [01:40.200 --> 01:44.240] family home that would have been favorable in the defendant's case when Mr. Bundy was [01:44.240 --> 01:48.600] released today Monday after leaving the courthouse, he told reporters that I've been a political [01:48.600 --> 01:53.360] prisoner for 700 days. He hadn't seen his wife for nearly two years due to the fact [01:53.360 --> 01:57.520] that he had refused any conditional release, which required him to forfeit his trial by [01:57.520 --> 02:01.200] jury rights. [02:01.200 --> 02:05.560] Former Google engineer James D'Amour filed a class action lawsuit against the Alphabet [02:05.560 --> 02:10.280] Corporation on Monday claiming that it discriminates against white men and those with conservative [02:10.280 --> 02:14.920] leaning views. D'Amour was terminated for dismantling a memo, essentially questioning [02:14.920 --> 02:19.600] the company's diversity policies. The suit is basically arguing that Google employees [02:19.600 --> 02:24.320] who express views deviating from corporate sentiments on politics and practices like [02:24.320 --> 02:31.000] diversity hiring policies via sensitivity and social justice were singled out, mistreated [02:31.000 --> 02:34.040] and systematically punished and terminated from Google. [02:34.040 --> 02:38.280] Google spokesman Tasha Parr said in response that we look forward to defending against [02:38.280 --> 02:40.280] Mr. D'Amour's lawsuit in court. [03:08.280 --> 03:12.280] What happens when you call the cops? You get your rights violated or you all get shot? [03:12.280 --> 03:17.280] This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. [03:17.280 --> 03:22.280] This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get [03:22.280 --> 03:23.280] shot. [03:23.280 --> 03:27.280] I'm thinking people being victimized by criminal cops. Psychopathic predators terrorize the [03:27.280 --> 03:31.280] neighborhood blocks. Equipped with pepper spray, mate, cuffs, cases and glass. They like serial [03:31.280 --> 03:35.280] killers acting out subliminal thoughts. Forget what you talk. These cops have got a license [03:35.280 --> 03:39.280] to kill. Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will. Code of silence means [03:39.280 --> 03:42.280] that the pigs will never let out a squeal. And if they go to court, they know the judge [03:42.280 --> 03:46.280] will make them a deal for real. That's why they're stopping me, locking me up and stopping [03:46.280 --> 03:50.280] me, confiscating my property, talking in my demography, making the poor commodities [03:50.280 --> 03:55.280] profiting off of poverty, in court, the policies supporting prison economy. Yeah, no one makes [03:55.280 --> 03:59.280] money when the violence stops. Hatin' brutality is the way to make a criminal cry. Blood in [03:59.280 --> 04:03.280] the gut is how to rich whether they bread at the top. And that's why this is what happens [04:03.280 --> 04:08.280] when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens [04:08.280 --> 04:09.280] when you call the cops. [04:09.280 --> 04:14.280] All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your [04:14.280 --> 04:23.280] host Eddie Craig. Man, it is February 5th of 2018. Can you believe it? We have now begun [04:23.280 --> 04:29.280] the second month of the new year. We are live tonight. This is not an archive. And we are [04:29.280 --> 04:34.280] live with all kinds of events going on around us here. We've got SWAT rolling through our [04:34.280 --> 04:40.280] neighborhood for a domestic issue where a woman that lives just down the street from [04:40.280 --> 04:45.280] me was physically assaulted to a life-threatening degree. And the cops in the SWAT team have [04:45.280 --> 04:50.280] the street where the house is cordoned off right now trying to get the guy out of the [04:50.280 --> 04:55.280] house if they're even aware that he's still in the house. It would be something for them [04:55.280 --> 05:02.280] to spend the last four hours talking to an empty house or to the family cat. But then [05:02.280 --> 05:11.280] again, never can tell. But the thing about it is, as usual, they brought every type of [05:11.280 --> 05:17.280] toy you can imagine, including two different SWAT teams, a couple of different military [05:17.280 --> 05:24.280] vehicles, and all the cop cars and helicopters you can find to round up and fly over a single [05:24.280 --> 05:34.280] neighborhood or pile onto its streets. It's kind of ridiculous, really, overkill, because [05:34.280 --> 05:40.280] whatever happened to trying to save a life instead of take another in America these days [05:40.280 --> 05:45.280] is just a question I've had for a while, but can't ever seem to get a straight answer to it. [05:45.280 --> 05:49.280] Now, for those of you that listened to last week's show, you know I brought up the issue [05:49.280 --> 05:57.280] of the state bar and attorneys in general and the criminality of the bar and what it does [05:57.280 --> 06:06.280] and how it does it and just the general thing involving attorneys. Well, this week I was [06:06.280 --> 06:13.280] talking to a woman, she's an older woman that is an attorney, and we've been acquainted. [06:13.280 --> 06:17.280] We don't really know each other, but we've been acquainted and had discussions as we've [06:17.280 --> 06:25.280] met up here and there over the last few years. And when I started telling her about the research [06:25.280 --> 06:31.280] I had done to the state bar act and all this other stuff and about how they have actually [06:31.280 --> 06:35.280] unlawfully seized control of government and all this, and I've got the documents that [06:35.280 --> 06:41.280] prove all of this, by the way. So it's not just me being hypothetical, it's me with actual [06:41.280 --> 06:48.280] documentation, the legislation, everything it says and all that good stuff, and the actual [06:48.280 --> 06:54.280] official records from the votes and everything that proves that it's correct. And then we [06:54.280 --> 07:02.280] also got into the issue of how abusive of the system both prosecuting and defense attorneys [07:02.280 --> 07:09.280] have become, or at least I got into that aspect of it. And within five minutes of me getting [07:09.280 --> 07:13.280] into the details about how these guys are taking people's money, telling them they're [07:13.280 --> 07:17.280] going to help them out, and then turning around and filing a motion to get dismissed from the [07:17.280 --> 07:22.280] case in the court while never refunding an individual's money, she took personal affront to [07:22.280 --> 07:27.280] this about me talking about attorneys that do these kind of things. And her defense was [07:27.280 --> 07:32.280] that I put a lot of time and effort and money into getting really good at doing this, and [07:32.280 --> 07:38.280] you've impugned the occupation that I've chosen, and I'm just done talking to you. Now I didn't [07:38.280 --> 07:44.280] make any personal attacks on her, I was talking generally about the facts of what is, and that [07:44.280 --> 07:51.280] I have actual records and documentation and personal experience to know is true. I have [07:51.280 --> 07:58.280] seen attorneys do this, I have worked for attorneys who have done this, okay? I have helped [07:58.280 --> 08:05.280] people whose attorneys have done this. They'll take their money, the person will demand that [08:05.280 --> 08:09.280] they do the job, protect their rights and defend them against the false allegations against [08:09.280 --> 08:16.280] them, and the attorney will not do it because he says the judge won't like it. And then [08:16.280 --> 08:21.280] after getting a huge lump of money from these people, we'll turn around and file to get [08:21.280 --> 08:26.280] dismissed from the case and pocket the money. They never give that money back, even though [08:26.280 --> 08:33.280] they didn't do one thing they were being paid to do. And that of course is lining their [08:33.280 --> 08:44.280] pockets for services not rendered. It is fraud. In any other profession, it is flat out fraud. [08:44.280 --> 08:51.280] Okay? But she got very upset about it, that I would couch it in those terms, even though [08:51.280 --> 09:01.280] the facts bear witness that it's all true. Okay? So again, that's the problem when you [09:01.280 --> 09:08.280] start talking to attorneys about being an attorney and the system they're involved in, [09:08.280 --> 09:14.280] just like it is about talking to one cop about bad cops and how there really are no good [09:14.280 --> 09:20.280] cops and you can prove it. The facts are they all take a vow to do this, this and this [09:20.280 --> 09:25.280] against what is moral and ethical in a country that's supposed to be free like ours. It's [09:25.280 --> 09:31.280] absolutely immoral and unethical to enforce 99% of the crap they enforce against people. [09:31.280 --> 09:36.280] It is absolutely immoral and unethical to be willing to use deadly force because a [09:36.280 --> 09:46.280] blinker on your car doesn't work and you didn't even know it. Okay? That is completely wrong. [09:46.280 --> 09:54.280] I don't care who you are, that's wrong. And when you take an oath to harm people for [09:54.280 --> 10:04.280] those reasons, then you're in this for the wrong reasons and you are not a good anything [10:04.280 --> 10:11.280] if that's how you intend to do things. End of discussion. And that is no less true for [10:11.280 --> 10:16.280] any profession, including attorneys. When you're going to lie to your client, betray [10:16.280 --> 10:21.280] your client, throw your client under the bus and do everything to protect your career [10:21.280 --> 10:26.280] and your bottom line over the client that paid you to protect them and see that they [10:26.280 --> 10:31.280] were properly vindicated and defended against these allegations and you don't do it, [10:31.280 --> 10:39.280] you're committing fraud. You are a criminal, paid or otherwise. Now, just so you know that [10:39.280 --> 10:45.280] I am not the only one that has this opinion, though I'm the one that spends an awful lot [10:45.280 --> 10:49.280] of time hearing these stories from people in the lower order of the courts and things [10:49.280 --> 10:54.280] where this happens more often than anywhere else because both sides there are absolutely [10:54.280 --> 11:00.280] corrupt, defense and prosecution. There is absolutely no question of that. Both of them [11:00.280 --> 11:08.280] can turn profits more readily at that level because no one pays any attention to the [11:08.280 --> 11:14.280] wrongdoing at the level of a municipal and JP courts. They just ignore it as if it's [11:14.280 --> 11:21.280] can all be fixed on appeal and it can't, especially when it comes to courts of no record. [11:21.280 --> 11:29.280] What the harm you suffer in these lower courts to your due process rights can never be [11:29.280 --> 11:39.280] remedied on a de novo appeal because it's not treated as an appeal. It's never treated [11:39.280 --> 11:46.280] as an appeal. It's treated as if it's the first place that you've gone when it's not. [11:46.280 --> 11:52.280] You see the problem here and then you go on all these attorney websites and look at all [11:52.280 --> 11:57.280] these things, for instance, I'm looking at one right now and this is the website of attorney [11:57.280 --> 12:05.280] Michael Lowe in Dallas, Fort Worth area and it is dallasjustice.com. Now, he's got his [12:05.280 --> 12:11.280] own legal blog on here and you should read some of the articles that are on this. For [12:11.280 --> 12:18.280] instance, there is one here titled and I kid you not district attorneys keep doing bad [12:18.280 --> 12:25.280] things more Texas prosecutorial misconduct stories. There's one here titled prosecutorial [12:25.280 --> 12:30.280] misconduct by Waco district attorney alleged by his first assistant. Now this is the [12:30.280 --> 12:39.280] Twin Peaks restaurant biker shootout slash case and the prosecuting attorney in Waco has [12:39.280 --> 12:46.280] been accused of misconduct by one of his own assistants. All right. Now, here's another [12:46.280 --> 12:52.280] one prosecutorial misconduct. How bad is it Dallas chief investigator pleads guilty to [12:52.280 --> 13:00.280] taking a bribe? More. Now, this is an interesting one because this one goes to something that's [13:00.280 --> 13:08.280] called the Brady list police that lie more on the secret Texas district attorney lists of [13:08.280 --> 13:14.280] police officers not trustworthy to take the witness stand. Okay. Now, y'all may have heard [13:14.280 --> 13:20.280] Randy mention this. I don't know if you have or not. Okay. But basically what this is is [13:20.280 --> 13:28.280] this is called the Brady list and it's from the Brady case back I think in the 60 something [13:28.280 --> 13:40.280] or other where the cops that had arrested this man lied about everything. Okay. And now [13:40.280 --> 13:45.280] the law under that Supreme Court opinion and the new Texas law the Michael Morton act that [13:45.280 --> 13:53.280] was put into place in 2014 have made it a requirement that a prosecuting attorney is supposed to [13:53.280 --> 14:02.280] provide you whether you asked for it or not with any evidence that would be helpful to [14:02.280 --> 14:09.280] your case and if you're accused of a crime. Now, when you read all of these blogs and [14:09.280 --> 14:16.280] everything else, the only thing they ever talk about are crimes where you can go to jail. [14:16.280 --> 14:23.280] They never talk about the misdemeanor cases where you can't go to jail, but you're still [14:23.280 --> 14:31.280] being robbed at the point of a gun and defrauded by a system that does not believe in justice [14:31.280 --> 14:39.280] of your money, your productivity, and your time. You're being robbed of those every time [14:39.280 --> 14:49.280] a citation is written unlawfully to you that you have to go to court and answer. Okay. [14:49.280 --> 14:57.280] They never talk about that yet I have seen just as much prosecutorial misconduct from [14:57.280 --> 15:03.280] county attorneys and JP courts and municipal attorneys and municipal courts as I've ever [15:03.280 --> 15:12.280] heard about from district attorneys. It's not just limited to cases where they can throw [15:12.280 --> 15:18.280] you in jail. They are perfectly willing to overlook fraud, theft, and extortion at the [15:18.280 --> 15:25.280] lower levels just so long they can't throw you in prison for it and somebody not answered. [15:25.280 --> 15:34.280] But the thing is, it's a rarity to see a prosecutor even if he gets somebody executed to [15:34.280 --> 15:44.280] actually be charged with a crime themselves. Okay. Now you may ask why am I getting into [15:44.280 --> 15:51.280] all this? And by the way, I highly recommend you go to DallasJustice.com. On the link at [15:51.280 --> 15:59.280] the top, there is a link for the legal blog or criminal blog or something like that. I [15:59.280 --> 16:03.280] forget exactly what it is. But there's a link in the little blue menu area at the top of [16:03.280 --> 16:08.280] all the pictures and everything for this. For the blog, go there and do a search for some [16:08.280 --> 16:12.280] of these articles. District attorneys keep doing bad things. Police officer or police [16:12.280 --> 16:19.280] that lie and so on and so forth. And see if you don't see a pattern here that we need [16:19.280 --> 16:28.280] to know about. Now, on top of all this, the reason I brought all this misconduct up and [16:28.280 --> 16:35.280] how this discussion with this female attorney that I kind of know has gone is to get into [16:35.280 --> 16:40.280] an issue that goes directly to the heart of the seminar material when you file some of [16:40.280 --> 16:47.280] the stuff in there and if by chance you get a response back from the prosecutor, and I [16:47.280 --> 16:52.280] say that with my fingers on either side as in, yeah, real prosecutor or not. Y'all [16:52.280 --> 17:20.280] hang on folks and we'll finish this discussion on the other side of the break. [17:20.280 --> 17:29.280] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete, [17:29.280 --> 17:35.280] and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. Bye bye yucky cookies. Now, I go to [17:35.280 --> 17:41.280] logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side, bookmark [17:41.280 --> 17:47.280] the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookie. [17:47.280 --> 17:52.280] New cookies for me. Consider it an early Christmas present and every time I order on [17:52.280 --> 17:57.280] Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too. [17:57.280 --> 18:26.280] See you for cookies. See you for cookies. Bye bye. [18:27.280 --> 18:34.280] We'll see you in the next video. [18:57.280 --> 19:07.280] We'll see you soon. [19:27.280 --> 19:56.280] We'll see you soon. [19:57.280 --> 20:21.280] Alright folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, [20:21.280 --> 20:28.280] Eddie Craig. It is February 5th, 2018. We are live tonight and I am going a little more [20:28.280 --> 20:35.280] in depth over the attorney situation that I began last Monday with the bar situation. [20:35.280 --> 20:41.280] Now, as I was saying, the reason I'm going into all this misconduct and things of that nature [20:41.280 --> 20:47.280] relating to DAs and prosecuting attorneys in general and when I say quotes around prosecutors [20:47.280 --> 20:53.280] talking about municipal attorneys who aren't constitutionally authorized to exercise that [20:53.280 --> 21:01.280] power by any stretch of the imagination, we run into the issue of these people just getting [21:01.280 --> 21:10.280] their way with the support of the court they're in. Now, there is nothing fair about these [21:10.280 --> 21:19.280] courts. And if you do have the actual blessing to find yourself in one where the judge actually [21:19.280 --> 21:29.280] cares about justice, which I've only had happen one time in my entire life, okay, once. [21:29.280 --> 21:35.280] And you will come to understand the perspective I'm about to try to explain to you. [21:35.280 --> 21:41.280] And without a frame of reference, you're going to find it hard or harder than those who have [21:41.280 --> 21:50.280] been through it to understand why this is a real issue. Now, I have somebody who I think [21:50.280 --> 21:57.280] recently filed one of the documents from the seminar material in a case that they're having. [21:57.280 --> 22:02.280] And it was, according to what they said, it was a motion to dismiss the 42-page one. [22:02.280 --> 22:08.280] Now, I'm not really sure there are several motions to dismiss in there and I don't have [22:08.280 --> 22:13.280] them memorized as to what their specific intent is by the number of pages they contain, so [22:13.280 --> 22:19.280] I don't know exactly which one of them he's referring to. But the fact of the matter is, [22:19.280 --> 22:27.280] is that every document short of the affidavits themselves that is in the seminar material [22:27.280 --> 22:40.280] writes every statute or court case or maximum law or thing of that nature that is an authority [22:40.280 --> 22:48.280] for what is being stated in the pleading. They all have authority behind them except [22:48.280 --> 22:55.280] where you are breaking down the elements of that authority for the discussion topic portion [22:55.280 --> 23:07.280] brief, okay? So imagine that you've worked that hard on a set of documents to input everything [23:07.280 --> 23:13.280] there is in support of your perspective and arguments into those documents with all the [23:13.280 --> 23:19.280] proper citations and documentation and all that other thing in support of what you're [23:19.280 --> 23:30.280] arguing. And then you have the city attorney or the county attorney or any attorney file [23:30.280 --> 23:38.280] a written response, which in and of itself is unheard of because more often than not, [23:38.280 --> 23:46.280] the one prosecuting the case never responds to anything that you put into writing and file. [23:46.280 --> 23:53.280] Now that alone is a due process violation when the judge acts suesponte to take on the [23:53.280 --> 24:01.280] burden of the prosecution to deny motions that are unchallenged and unopposed in any [24:01.280 --> 24:10.280] way by the other side. That's not being fair and impartial. That's not being unbiased. [24:10.280 --> 24:18.280] That is the judge being proactive on the side of the prosecution who was too damned lazy [24:18.280 --> 24:28.280] or incompetent to answer anything that you put into what you filed. There is no way around [24:28.280 --> 24:36.280] that. If this was a civil suit, they would have lost it automatically because they supplied [24:36.280 --> 24:44.280] absolutely no actual complaint with a claim from which they could get relief and then [24:44.280 --> 24:54.280] they failed to answer the response. They would have lost but not here. And the question [24:54.280 --> 25:02.280] remains why? Now think about this. This document they filed 42 pages long. So obviously it [25:02.280 --> 25:10.280] was either a whole bunch of just patronite garbage which my material absolutely is not [25:10.280 --> 25:16.280] or it was extensively written to cover every possible avenue that the state could try to [25:16.280 --> 25:24.280] use to escape the fact pattern that they themselves attempted to establish and you are now ripping [25:24.280 --> 25:34.280] to shreds in this pleading. This is the response that was actually filed in such a case. [25:34.280 --> 25:40.280] State's response to defendants motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Now comes the state [25:40.280 --> 25:45.280] of Texas and hereby respectfully requests the court to deny defendants motion to dismiss [25:45.280 --> 25:50.280] for lack of jurisdiction and retain the case on the court's docket. The state of Texas asserts [25:50.280 --> 25:56.280] that defendants 42-page motion has no basis in established law. Wherefore premises considered [25:56.280 --> 26:01.280] the state requests the court set defendants motion for hearing, deny defendants motion [26:01.280 --> 26:07.280] and retain states case on the docket. Respectfully submitted and then it's got the attorney's name [26:07.280 --> 26:16.280] and bar number and all that. This one was signed by I'm an idiot. Okay. Now that is all there [26:16.280 --> 26:27.280] is to this. Their entire rebuttal is the motion has no basis in established law. Now to understand [26:27.280 --> 26:37.280] the lunacy of this response we first have to understand something else. What does established [26:37.280 --> 26:48.280] law mean? Okay. So this is what we're getting into next. When you look up the definition [26:48.280 --> 27:01.280] of established law the only thing that you can find is C code. Okay. C O D E C code. So [27:01.280 --> 27:12.280] we know established law tells us to see what the meaning of code is. Okay. We can do that. [27:12.280 --> 27:21.280] So we go and look at code and there are several variations but all of the definition of code [27:21.280 --> 27:28.280] but all of them go to the exact same point. They're all worded different but they all come [27:28.280 --> 27:40.280] to the exact same ending for code. A systematic and comprehensive compilation of laws, rules [27:40.280 --> 27:49.280] or regulations that are consolidated and classified according to subject matter. Well let's see. [27:49.280 --> 27:54.280] We have the code of criminal procedure. We have the penal code. We have the transportation [27:54.280 --> 27:58.280] code. We have the health and commerce code. We have the occupations code. The water code. [27:58.280 --> 28:05.280] The property code. The tax code. The family code. The health and welfare code. I mean [28:05.280 --> 28:14.280] we got codes out the union but each one of those codes is a systematic and comprehensive [28:14.280 --> 28:18.280] compilation of laws, rules and regulations that are consolidated and classified according [28:18.280 --> 28:25.280] to subject matter. That particular definition goes on to say many states have published official [28:25.280 --> 28:31.280] codes of all laws in force including the common law and statutes as judicially interpreted [28:31.280 --> 28:37.280] that have been compiled by code commissions and enacted by legislatures. The U.S. code is [28:37.280 --> 28:45.280] the compilation of the federal laws. Okay. Now you get this? So the codes are established [28:45.280 --> 28:58.280] law. When you read there are let's see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 different variations of the [28:58.280 --> 29:02.280] definition of code depending upon what we're talking about here. Like code Napoleon for [29:02.280 --> 29:10.280] instance, code of Louisiana which is Napoleonic code by the way, code Justinian, code legislation [29:10.280 --> 29:16.280] and then just code code code on the rest of them. But no matter how you slice this it [29:16.280 --> 29:27.280] all comes down to the same thing. A volume of individual subject matter related statutory [29:27.280 --> 29:37.280] schemes in an organized form. That is the established law. Okay. Now think about that for [29:37.280 --> 29:44.280] just a minute and I'm going to revisit this rebuttal on that particular line when we return [29:44.280 --> 29:51.280] and let's see if now it makes a difference. Alright folks this Monday night rule of law [29:51.280 --> 30:15.280] radio y'all hang on and we will be right back. [30:15.280 --> 30:44.280] We'll be right back. [30:45.280 --> 30:50.280] It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to [30:50.280 --> 30:55.280] identify and track people on the streets. Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada and [30:55.280 --> 31:00.280] America are getting in on the act. So where do they hide the cameras? In the eyes of [31:00.280 --> 31:05.280] mannequins. That's right those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be [31:05.280 --> 31:11.280] watching you back. They're called eye seers and their job is to log the age, gender and [31:11.280 --> 31:17.280] race of passersby. So retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy. But hang on [31:17.280 --> 31:22.280] aren't mannequins spooky enough already? This is taking weird science to a whole new [31:22.280 --> 31:50.280] level. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com the world's most private search engine. [31:50.280 --> 32:00.280] That saves you space, time and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at USUSA.org. [32:50.280 --> 33:10.280] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:20.280 --> 33:30.280] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:50.280 --> 34:00.280] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [34:00.280 --> 34:10.280] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [34:10.280 --> 34:15.280] Alright folks we are back this is rule of law radio. Alright we are talking about the [34:15.280 --> 34:21.280] meaning of the phrase established law. Now there is something else here to kind of pay [34:21.280 --> 34:28.280] attention to and there is a legal maxim that reads quote populist, posturumum, [34:28.280 --> 34:34.280] jucit, idjust, radum, esto which is Latin for what the people have last and acted let [34:34.280 --> 34:42.280] that be the established law. Okay so again more confirmation that what the people last [34:42.280 --> 34:47.280] and acted through their representative legislative members were the statutes [34:47.280 --> 34:54.280] okay or at least revisions of those statutes. So if all the legal pleadings in the [34:54.280 --> 35:00.280] seminar material cites the statutes and any case law that is on point with the [35:00.280 --> 35:07.280] argument made in relation to those statutes how then is this a proper rebuttal? [35:07.280 --> 35:14.280] The 42 page motion has no basis in established law and yet the only thing [35:14.280 --> 35:22.280] it argues from is the position of established law. Now that right there is [35:22.280 --> 35:27.280] knowing and willful fraud upon the court unless of course what this attorney is [35:27.280 --> 35:36.280] referring to is something other than the established law is actually the law. [35:36.280 --> 35:43.280] Which means if they are in disagreement whatever it is he's referring to as [35:43.280 --> 35:53.280] established law with what is actually in the code then whose information is better? [35:53.280 --> 35:59.280] You see the problem we're running into here? If the codes themselves are not the [35:59.280 --> 36:03.280] established law and the interpretations based upon those are not the established [36:03.280 --> 36:13.280] law then what is this guy calling the established law to say that this is irrelevant to it? [36:13.280 --> 36:20.280] Well the answer to that is he's not. He's not making any claim because if he were [36:20.280 --> 36:26.280] he would be rebutting it with a set of point by point facts as to why the [36:26.280 --> 36:33.280] arguments are incorrect but he's not doing that. He is simply making a sweeping [36:33.280 --> 36:39.280] gesture of this is all wrong. Just ignore it as if it doesn't exist because it's [36:39.280 --> 36:50.280] all wrong yet he has not provided a single fact or point of law to refute [36:50.280 --> 37:01.280] anything that was argued. Nothing. So why would the judge be so willing to grant [37:01.280 --> 37:09.280] this motion while ignoring everything set out in yours? If it's not because the [37:09.280 --> 37:16.280] judge is prejudicial and biased toward his employer whether that be the state, [37:16.280 --> 37:25.280] the county or the city. Because if you and I were standing in a room full of [37:25.280 --> 37:33.280] people on debate teams and the other teams only response to every argument made [37:33.280 --> 37:40.280] by every other team is just ignore it. It has no basis in the facts that we're [37:40.280 --> 37:46.280] relying on but you don't tell anybody what those facts are and then the judges [37:46.280 --> 37:53.280] all go hey you did great you win the debate. But you said absolutely nothing [37:53.280 --> 37:59.280] of any merit to support any disqualification of the other arguments or to [37:59.280 --> 38:06.280] validate your own but you won anyway. Would you begin to question whether or [38:06.280 --> 38:17.280] not that debate contest was rigged? I sure as hell would. Well it is rigged. [38:17.280 --> 38:26.280] That's simple. It is rigged. No two ways about it. It's rigged. Now this lady [38:26.280 --> 38:29.280] that I was talking about earlier, this attorney that I've known for a little [38:29.280 --> 38:32.280] while and we're not really on a first name basis or anything. We're just kind [38:32.280 --> 38:38.280] of acquainted because we see each other all the time in this location and we [38:38.280 --> 38:42.280] talk from time to time. Or at least we did now that she doesn't like me anymore [38:42.280 --> 38:48.280] because I impugned a crooked profession that she chose to spend money to be [38:48.280 --> 38:55.280] good at even if she isn't using it for crooked purposes. She is in the minority [38:55.280 --> 39:03.280] in that regard. The fact of the matter is when we go through this and see this [39:03.280 --> 39:09.280] every single day across the state, every state in these lower courts so that [39:09.280 --> 39:14.280] they can steal your money off without incident of any kind and without [39:14.280 --> 39:20.280] cutting off or minimizing that flow through their courts. You have to realize [39:20.280 --> 39:26.280] something is amiss because this response should be thrown out of court as not [39:26.280 --> 39:34.280] being a response. The first thing you should do if you see a response like [39:34.280 --> 39:42.280] this, which is not often at all so you would even have a chance to do so, is [39:42.280 --> 39:50.280] to say objection. This entire thing they've done is argumentative but with no [39:50.280 --> 39:55.280] merit of its own because it cites absolutely no lawful or legal basis as [39:55.280 --> 40:03.280] to why all of the established law used is not actually the established law [40:03.280 --> 40:13.280] according to this guy. This is utter garbage. I demand that his motion to [40:13.280 --> 40:20.280] deny my motion be denied but that ain't how it's going to work out and we know [40:20.280 --> 40:25.280] this. It doesn't matter how much paper you file these people aren't going to do [40:25.280 --> 40:33.280] anything that is honest. It's just as simple and until you've gone through it [40:33.280 --> 40:39.280] time and time again you're never going to understand that for real and I hear [40:39.280 --> 40:43.280] it time and time again from people. It's like I never thought you were right. [40:43.280 --> 40:46.280] I never thought this kind of thing went on. I didn't believe it and then [40:46.280 --> 40:52.280] dad gummit it happened to me or it happened to my wife or my kids or my [40:52.280 --> 41:02.280] mother or my father or my brother or my sister or my girlfriend. It is amazing [41:02.280 --> 41:07.280] what people can look the other way at until it rears its head and bites them [41:07.280 --> 41:13.280] personally before they'll pay any attention to it. I equate that to [41:13.280 --> 41:19.280] telling somebody don't go in that yard. There is a rabid dog living in that [41:19.280 --> 41:25.280] yard not for much longer but he's still there and if you go in that yard you [41:25.280 --> 41:30.280] run the very serious risk of getting bit infected and suffering greatly for your [41:30.280 --> 41:36.280] ignorance and not listening to me. I ain't never had nothing like that to [41:36.280 --> 41:41.280] worry about. I'll go on up there and then here comes that dog soon as I [41:41.280 --> 41:46.280] through the gate and they dang near or do break a leg trying to get back out [41:46.280 --> 41:50.280] without getting bit and they may make it and they may not and they'll look at [41:50.280 --> 41:56.280] you like I never thought that kind of thing was happening and you just got [41:56.280 --> 42:03.280] to tell them that it was happening. It's what is wrong with people? Why is this [42:03.280 --> 42:10.280] so hard for people to see for what it is? I mean you want to know why America is [42:10.280 --> 42:20.280] sucking and circling the drain right now? There you go. It's all about me. [42:20.280 --> 42:25.280] If it hadn't happened to me it hadn't happened to anybody and if it has happened [42:25.280 --> 42:35.280] to somebody else it ain't me so I don't care and that's just the way it is and [42:35.280 --> 42:40.280] heaven help you if you get between them and what they are worshiping on any [42:40.280 --> 42:47.280] particular day whether it be Trump or football or cops or anything else they [42:47.280 --> 42:53.280] just can't help it. Now let me explain to you which I don't have a lot of time to do [42:53.280 --> 42:56.280] here before I'm taking another break but I'll see if I can get through it. [42:56.280 --> 43:00.280] When you get a non-response like this this is what you need to understand is [43:00.280 --> 43:06.280] actually being said by the attorney in the case. Help! I can't actually refute [43:06.280 --> 43:11.280] anything this prosa individual says in their pleadings. Neither the actual law [43:11.280 --> 43:16.280] and statutes or case opinions specifically address and refute the arguments [43:16.280 --> 43:21.280] they're making. I need you to back my play here which is going to be just me [43:21.280 --> 43:25.280] making a sweeping and totally unsubstantiated claim that the arguments [43:25.280 --> 43:30.280] have no basis of established law. Judge this is going to let you back me up by [43:30.280 --> 43:35.280] throwing in whatever completely off point case opinion you want even if they were [43:35.280 --> 43:40.280] written before the implementation of whatever statutory changes that may now [43:40.280 --> 43:45.280] exist. Just please back me up here because I can't beat this argument on the [43:45.280 --> 43:51.280] merits. If we're going to take his money we have to work together to lie. [43:51.280 --> 43:56.280] Alright? Hold that thought. We'll be right back on the other side of the break. [44:22.280 --> 44:27.280] Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. [44:27.280 --> 44:32.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning [44:32.280 --> 44:37.280] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should [44:37.280 --> 44:42.280] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:42.280 --> 44:48.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:48.280 --> 44:55.280] prosatastic and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [44:55.280 --> 45:00.280] or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:03.280 --> 45:07.280] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to [45:07.280 --> 45:12.280] invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, [45:12.280 --> 45:16.280] Texas. Find brave new books and change things. To see all our fantastic health and wellness [45:16.280 --> 45:21.280] products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our miracle healing clay that [45:21.280 --> 45:24.280] started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other [45:24.280 --> 45:29.280] wonderful products including our Australian emu oil, erosion candles, olive oil soaps [45:29.280 --> 45:38.280] and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [45:38.280 --> 45:45.280] That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook [45:45.280 --> 45:50.280] for information on events and our product naturespureorganics.com. [46:15.280 --> 46:21.280] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to [46:21.280 --> 46:27.280] invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, [46:27.280 --> 46:52.280] Texas. [46:52.280 --> 47:01.280] Hi folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. Now, on this, [47:01.280 --> 47:08.280] when we're talking about this kind of argument where the prosecutor is trying to get the [47:08.280 --> 47:17.280] judge to help them against you, there is no fair trial to be had because obviously [47:17.280 --> 47:24.280] this juncture, in order to get this denial of your motion and the granting of theirs, [47:24.280 --> 47:34.280] there are no amount or there is no amount of facts and evidence that are being applied [47:34.280 --> 47:46.280] by the court. None. They are doing absolutely nothing in relation to the law. They are doing [47:46.280 --> 47:56.280] what they want to do regardless of the law because opposing counsel didn't cite a single [47:56.280 --> 48:02.280] thing to refute what the arguments and the support for those arguments that you were [48:02.280 --> 48:07.280] making actually was. Nothing. They didn't refute anything. They just made the blankest [48:07.280 --> 48:12.280] statement. It's not any good. Don't believe any of it. Just find a system and let us win. [48:12.280 --> 48:20.280] No problem. It's criminal, folks. It's just money. [48:20.280 --> 48:27.280] Well, say that when you can't pay your bills, your rent, your mortgage. Say that when all [48:27.280 --> 48:33.280] your money is being stolen and these bogus traffic tickets do bogus due process made [48:33.280 --> 48:40.280] to look like due process so that they make millions and you wind up living on the street [48:40.280 --> 48:49.280] because you can't pay your bills. Think about that. One ticket ain't going to break me. [48:49.280 --> 48:54.280] Well, that might be true for you, but it isn't true for everyone. [48:54.280 --> 49:01.280] Look at all these news stories about these inner city folks that are getting tens of [49:01.280 --> 49:08.280] thousands of dollars of fines against them based upon a single $200 ticket they couldn't [49:08.280 --> 49:13.280] pay and now they've got five, six, seven thousand dollars in accumulated late fees and [49:13.280 --> 49:22.280] interest that have been tacked onto that because they were poor. What do they do about that? [49:22.280 --> 49:26.280] Because they got exactly the same kind of justice originally that I'm talking about [49:26.280 --> 49:37.280] right now, which is to say none at all. They never had a chance. [49:37.280 --> 49:46.280] It's criminal. It's for the enrichment of the people who create the conflict to the [49:46.280 --> 49:55.280] disadvantage suffering and extortion of the rest of us. That's simple. [49:55.280 --> 50:07.280] Remember, there are only three ways I can imagine that an attorney gets paid. [50:07.280 --> 50:14.280] A, he gets paid to draw up legal documents for which you pay him a fee. [50:14.280 --> 50:27.280] B, he gets paid to manage something for which you pay him a fee. Or C, he either creates [50:27.280 --> 50:38.280] or inserts himself into a conflict for which he either gets a fee or a percentage of [50:38.280 --> 50:46.280] whatever is won. Now if you boil everything that they get paid for down, you'll probably [50:46.280 --> 50:54.280] be able to put it squarely within one of those three categories. [50:54.280 --> 50:58.280] If you really think about it, you should be able to get it boiled down to one of those [50:58.280 --> 51:03.280] three things. They either create a conflict or insert themselves into a conflict, i.e. [51:03.280 --> 51:09.280] they write laws to ensure that they're vague and obtuse so that nobody can clearly [51:09.280 --> 51:14.280] understand them and not even the courts and attorneys themselves. Why do you think [51:14.280 --> 51:19.280] there are so many opposing interpretations and perspectives of the written law? [51:19.280 --> 51:25.280] It's because the law is intentionally to be that vague and ambiguous so that they can [51:25.280 --> 51:32.280] use it however they want whenever they need to. That's not by accident because this [51:32.280 --> 51:36.280] is the kind of thing that's been going on for a very long time. If they were truly [51:36.280 --> 51:41.280] trying to perfect the art of writing a law where these types of conflicts were [51:41.280 --> 51:50.280] minimized, litigation should have gone down. The language used to write a code or statute [51:50.280 --> 51:59.280] within a code should have minimized by now. Instead, it's gotten voluminous. [51:59.280 --> 52:07.280] Okay? So this is not about making the law easy to understand or comprehensible to [52:07.280 --> 52:15.280] the common everyday individual. It is about giving away to the attorneys to create [52:15.280 --> 52:25.280] or engage in a conflict for which they can get paid by one side or both. [52:25.280 --> 52:29.280] You got that? And this is fairly easy to do considering that they have managed to [52:29.280 --> 52:40.280] give themselves a government protected monopoly on what they do. [52:40.280 --> 52:47.280] It's a crime of the highest order against the people because we can no longer [52:47.280 --> 52:53.280] participate in an entire department of our own government in any meaningful way. [52:53.280 --> 52:59.280] Just like I said last week, we have been completely disenfranchised. All the [52:59.280 --> 53:04.280] authority of the judicial department has been usurped to one specific class of [53:04.280 --> 53:13.280] individuals called attorneys. And that's not right. That's not the way this was [53:13.280 --> 53:19.280] set up to work. So how did it happen? Well, I tell you, public education made you [53:19.280 --> 53:31.280] stupid and the me, me, me and instant gratification mindsets have made you [53:31.280 --> 53:39.280] unwilling to devote any time and effort to figuring out what's wrong. [53:39.280 --> 53:45.280] Put those two together and you've got the New America exactly as the [53:45.280 --> 53:51.280] communists and Marxists and socialists want it to be. They have been quite [53:51.280 --> 54:00.280] successful at it. Have you not watched some of these videos of people asking [54:00.280 --> 54:05.280] what should be fairly simple everyday questions about America to college [54:05.280 --> 54:10.280] students, even older folks, and they look at you like, what planet are you from? [54:10.280 --> 54:13.280] Why would you ask me a question like that? I have no clue what you're talking [54:13.280 --> 54:17.280] about. Oh yeah, I know the answer and it's so far from off being right that it's [54:17.280 --> 54:24.280] absolutely hilarious. I mean, hell, you say Homer Simpson to a group of college [54:24.280 --> 54:31.280] kids now and half of them think he's one of the guys on Mount Rushmore. And if [54:31.280 --> 54:47.280] he isn't, he ought to be. That is where you live now. Sad, isn't it? Now, what [54:47.280 --> 54:51.280] this also boils down to is eventually in that courtroom you're going to ask a [54:51.280 --> 54:56.280] question of the cop that started all this rigmarole and got you into that [54:56.280 --> 55:00.280] courtroom so that you had to write these legal pleadings in the first place and [55:00.280 --> 55:04.280] you're going to be trying to get them to give you answers to certain things. And [55:04.280 --> 55:08.280] then, inevitably, you're going to have a prosecuting attorney jump up and go, [55:08.280 --> 55:14.280] objection, the officer is not required to know whatever that is that you just [55:14.280 --> 55:18.280] asking. For instance, the legal definition of this term or that term or blah, [55:18.280 --> 55:26.280] blah, blah. Now, here is the problem with that assertion by the prosecuting [55:26.280 --> 55:39.280] attorney to protect the validity of his witness. If the officer does not know how [55:39.280 --> 55:47.280] the law defines a term or phrase in order to use it in the law, nor does the [55:47.280 --> 55:56.280] officer know the subject matter under which the law is required to be operating, [55:56.280 --> 56:02.280] how can the officer know the law well enough to do three things, get reasonable [56:02.280 --> 56:09.280] suspicion, get probable cause, or to make an allegation that the law was broken. [56:09.280 --> 56:13.280] If you don't know what the law is, how can you say it was broken? And if you [56:13.280 --> 56:19.280] don't know what the law of the elements of the offense is within the law that [56:19.280 --> 56:23.280] you're accusing someone of, how do you know it was broken? And then, how do you [56:23.280 --> 56:28.280] get on the stand and testify that this person was doing A, B, and C using the [56:28.280 --> 56:34.280] same legal terms that you don't know as if they're fat when you have no clue [56:34.280 --> 56:41.280] what they even mean? How can you testify that a conveyance is a motor vehicle when [56:41.280 --> 56:46.280] you do not know what the legal definition of motor vehicle is or that the only [56:46.280 --> 56:51.280] subject matter that the legislature said that particular definition applied to [56:51.280 --> 57:03.280] is the activity known as transportation? You see the problem here? The cop is [57:03.280 --> 57:09.280] testifying as if the statement on the citation or in the complaint is a fact [57:09.280 --> 57:15.280] when in fact they have no clue if it's a fact. But they're under oath testifying [57:15.280 --> 57:21.280] as if it is when what they're really offering is their opinion and their legal [57:21.280 --> 57:29.280] conclusion, which A, they're not qualified to make, and B, is inadmissible because [57:29.280 --> 57:34.280] they're not qualified to make it. They are not sworn in as an expert witness who [57:34.280 --> 57:42.280] can offer opinion or conclusion about anything. Yet here they are sitting on [57:42.280 --> 57:49.280] the witness stand doing exactly that under the guise of testifying to facts within [57:49.280 --> 57:56.280] their knowledge when they are not within their knowledge. Objection, the officer [57:56.280 --> 58:00.280] is not required to know that. Judge I object as the prosecution disqualifying [58:00.280 --> 58:05.280] their own witness by saying the officer is incompetent to testify to the facts [58:05.280 --> 58:10.280] alleged in the complaint and on the face of the citation in this proceeding. [58:10.280 --> 58:16.280] Because if that is the case, why did they swear them in to suborn perjury's [58:16.280 --> 58:21.280] testimony on the stand if they knew up front the officer didn't know these [58:21.280 --> 58:35.280] things? Because that is exactly what they are doing. And yet you will never find [58:35.280 --> 58:40.280] one of them that will admit this is what they're doing. But it isn't hard to look [58:40.280 --> 58:45.280] around and find evidence that it is. Y'all hang on, we'll be right back at the top [58:45.280 --> 58:54.280] of the hour break. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet [58:54.280 --> 58:59.280] countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some [58:59.280 --> 59:03.280] new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can [59:03.280 --> 59:09.280] compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. [59:09.280 --> 59:14.280] First this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real [59:14.280 --> 59:19.280] recovery is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound [59:19.280 --> 59:24.280] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the [59:24.280 --> 59:28.280] riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for [59:28.280 --> 59:33.280] America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.280 --> 59:38.280] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free [59:38.280 --> 59:50.280] at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.280 --> 01:00:00.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:00:00.280 --> 01:00:05.280] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown. [01:00:05.280 --> 01:00:10.280] Markets for Wednesday the 29th of November open with gold at $1,295.52 [01:00:10.280 --> 01:00:17.280] an ounce, silver $16.89 an ounce, Texas Crude $57.99 a barrel. Bitcoin broke [01:00:17.280 --> 01:00:22.280] $10,000 and is sitting at $10,278 U.S. dollars and Dashcoin is sitting [01:00:22.280 --> 01:00:31.280] at about $643 U.S. fiat. [01:00:31.280 --> 01:00:36.280] Today in history, the year 1963 U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson establishes [01:00:36.280 --> 01:00:41.280] the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. [01:00:41.280 --> 01:00:44.280] Today in history. [01:00:44.280 --> 01:00:48.280] In recent news, Trump-pointed FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has been in the headlines [01:00:48.280 --> 01:00:53.280] lately with the Trump's administration's decision to scrap Obama's net neutrality regulations. [01:00:53.280 --> 01:00:57.280] Regulations, i.e. powers, government bureaucrats tout the absolutely need in [01:00:57.280 --> 01:01:01.280] order to keep Internet content equally accessible to all consumers, regardless [01:01:01.280 --> 01:01:05.280] of provider preferences. It seems many in Washington and many of those who report [01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:09.280] on such matters have failed to take note of one simple economic reality, that is [01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.280] that the ISPs who decided to artificially block or slow down certain website [01:01:13.280 --> 01:01:17.280] traffic would lose business to providers who didn't. And given exclusive [01:01:17.280 --> 01:01:21.280] treatment to some sites in exchange for payments, not only a standard business model [01:01:21.280 --> 01:01:25.280] but only makes sense considering the flow of given sites. Now to mention [01:01:25.280 --> 01:01:29.280] and don't recall what widespread content was being censored before the enforcement [01:01:29.280 --> 01:01:33.280] of the also benevolently sounding net neutrality regulation. [01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:37.280] During his speech at a R Street Institute event, Pai stated that quote [01:01:37.280 --> 01:01:41.280] when it comes to a free and open Internet, Twitter is part of the problem [01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:45.280] and that the company has a viewpoint that it uses that viewpoint to discriminate. [01:01:45.280 --> 01:01:49.280] Similar sentiments were stated towards the many online giants who support net neutrality [01:01:49.280 --> 01:01:53.280] stating that quote, they may cloak their advocacy and public interests, but the real [01:01:53.280 --> 01:01:57.280] interest of these Internet giants is in using the regulatory process [01:01:57.280 --> 01:02:01.280] to cement their dominance in the Internet economy. Only intensive research [01:02:01.280 --> 01:02:05.280] and an evaluation of incentives will reveal whether net neutrality is a chronic [01:02:05.280 --> 01:02:09.280] takeover or not. [01:02:09.280 --> 01:02:13.280] The Holcomb family who lost eight members including a woman who was pregnant in the Mass Church [01:02:13.280 --> 01:02:17.280] shooting in 1st Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, has filed a wrongful [01:02:17.280 --> 01:02:21.280] death claim against the US military, claiming that the Air Force's negligence [01:02:21.280 --> 01:02:25.280] led to the gunman being able to acquire his weapons. The Air Force did [01:02:25.280 --> 01:02:29.280] admit that findings by Inspector General confirmed that proper personnel at home [01:02:29.280 --> 01:02:33.280] in Air Force Base did not report lawfully required information to civilian [01:02:33.280 --> 01:02:37.280] law enforcement in regards to the perpetrator's domestic violence case, [01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:41.280] a case that if reported would have borrowed him from potentially buying firearms. [01:02:41.280 --> 01:02:45.280] The one-star lowdown is currently for sponsors, certainly [01:02:45.280 --> 01:02:51.280] for a service just to advertise with us, feel free to get any call at 21-0-363-2257, [01:02:51.280 --> 01:02:56.280] which is quick roadie with your lowdown for November 29th, [01:02:56.280 --> 01:03:00.280] 2017. [01:03:00.280 --> 01:03:04.280] We make our own whiskey and our own smoke too [01:03:04.280 --> 01:03:08.280] Ain't too many things these old boys can't do [01:03:08.280 --> 01:03:15.280] We're broke good old maters and homemade wine [01:03:15.280 --> 01:03:18.280] And the country folks can't survive [01:03:18.280 --> 01:03:22.280] The country folks can't survive [01:03:26.280 --> 01:03:30.280] But cause you can't starve us out and you can't make us run [01:03:30.280 --> 01:03:34.280] Cause those mutton-moan boys raise own shots guns [01:03:34.280 --> 01:03:38.280] We say great, we say ma'am [01:03:38.280 --> 01:03:42.280] If you ain't into that, we don't give a damn [01:03:44.280 --> 01:03:49.280] We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky Mountains [01:03:49.280 --> 01:03:53.280] Alright folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio show. [01:03:53.280 --> 01:03:57.280] It is February 5th, 2018. We are live tonight. [01:03:57.280 --> 01:04:00.280] So this is not a recording yet. [01:04:00.280 --> 01:04:04.280] Alright, now, as I said [01:04:04.280 --> 01:04:08.280] When this officer is up there testifying and he does not know these things [01:04:08.280 --> 01:04:13.280] Then he is not testifying as to facts within his personal knowledge [01:04:13.280 --> 01:04:18.280] He is testifying as to his opinion and his legal conclusion [01:04:18.280 --> 01:04:22.280] Not to actual facts [01:04:22.280 --> 01:04:27.280] So right there when the prosecutor says the officer is not required to know that [01:04:27.280 --> 01:04:31.280] We need to draw a distinction between what's being objected to here [01:04:31.280 --> 01:04:36.280] I object, judge. I didn't ask the officer if they were required to know this [01:04:36.280 --> 01:04:40.280] I asked if they did or did not know this [01:04:40.280 --> 01:04:43.280] But what difference does that make? [01:04:43.280 --> 01:04:48.280] Well, it makes a very big difference to reasonable suspicion and probable cause, judge [01:04:48.280 --> 01:04:52.280] It makes a very big difference as to whether or not they are testifying the actual fact [01:04:52.280 --> 01:04:55.280] Or simply opinion or legal conjecture [01:04:55.280 --> 01:05:00.280] That's the difference. The problem is that you don't know that [01:05:00.280 --> 01:05:04.280] And you're the judge [01:05:04.280 --> 01:05:09.280] How can you not know that? [01:05:09.280 --> 01:05:14.280] You see the problem? [01:05:14.280 --> 01:05:19.280] It doesn't matter whether the person sitting on the bench is an attorney or not [01:05:19.280 --> 01:05:24.280] They either are an idiot or they are incompetent [01:05:24.280 --> 01:05:30.280] Or they are abusing their authority because they know damn well they're in the wrong [01:05:30.280 --> 01:05:37.280] And they're subverting the law for what they wanted as a result anyway [01:05:37.280 --> 01:05:43.280] Anything but providing justice [01:05:43.280 --> 01:05:45.280] Okay? [01:05:45.280 --> 01:05:48.280] So it doesn't matter how you slice that pie [01:05:48.280 --> 01:05:53.280] The filling is still made of crap [01:05:53.280 --> 01:05:58.280] It's the scene out of the movie, the help, all over again [01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:06.280] Okay? [01:06:06.280 --> 01:06:12.280] So I can't help that this lady attorney got her feelings heard about what I was saying [01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:17.280] And took it personal, even though I never pointed a finger directly at her and simply said, look [01:06:17.280 --> 01:06:21.280] According to the facts and the records I've got, this is the problem [01:06:21.280 --> 01:06:24.280] The bars have done this, they've done this [01:06:24.280 --> 01:06:32.280] And she wanted to argue about how the bar was punishing certain kinds of attorneys for certain things [01:06:32.280 --> 01:06:34.280] And then I asked her straight up as well [01:06:34.280 --> 01:06:39.280] Based upon what you're talking about with all these things you're saying that the bar is doing to certain attorneys [01:06:39.280 --> 01:06:46.280] The question I would have to ask is, of these punishments that you say these people are getting [01:06:46.280 --> 01:06:55.280] The basis for the punishment because they ticked off the judge or because they did something bad to a client [01:06:55.280 --> 01:06:57.280] Well, I don't know the answer to that [01:06:57.280 --> 01:06:59.280] Right, you don't [01:06:59.280 --> 01:07:07.280] And the thing about it is, is that nine times out of ten, an attorney that gets punished or disbarred is disbarred [01:07:07.280 --> 01:07:13.280] Because he went against the system, not because he screwed a client [01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:22.280] Hell, he can't hardly get disbarred when he screws a defendant as a prosecutor [01:07:22.280 --> 01:07:28.280] So how are you going to get your defense attorney for not doing his job? [01:07:28.280 --> 01:07:39.280] When a prosecutor can get you executed in the state of Texas and still remain a prosecutor with a bar card [01:07:39.280 --> 01:07:48.280] All because there is an organization in existence that is constitutionally prohibited from existing in the first place [01:07:48.280 --> 01:08:03.280] And that organization has seized control of an entire branch of government and then every important office of power and authority in all of the others [01:08:03.280 --> 01:08:18.280] Face facts folks, the attorneys are now the government in every branch at every level, the attorneys [01:08:18.280 --> 01:08:26.280] And that's not right, that leaves you and I out in the cold while they do whatever they want [01:08:26.280 --> 01:08:39.280] And the end goal of it all is to line their own pockets because the end result is always the lining of their pockets [01:08:39.280 --> 01:08:50.280] I don't know if any of you have ever seen it, there is a John Travolta movie where he is an attorney, I think it's called a civil action [01:08:50.280 --> 01:09:02.280] That may be the Gene Hackman version of the movie, but anyway, and in this he is trying to prove that this levitating company poisoned this river [01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:10.280] And people were dying from the polluted water and so on and so forth [01:09:10.280 --> 01:09:16.280] And of course he is so obsessed with this case [01:09:16.280 --> 01:09:26.280] First it's all about the money and then as he goes forward he develops a conscience which don't ever hope that's going to happen when you're dealing with an attorney [01:09:26.280 --> 01:09:28.280] Never count on that [01:09:28.280 --> 01:09:36.280] And bankrupts his entire law firm trying to fight this case [01:09:36.280 --> 01:09:51.280] And the thing about it is in the end he has to actually forward all of the stuff about the case to the environmental protection agency at the federal level [01:09:51.280 --> 01:09:56.280] In order to have someone actually go after this company to fix the problem [01:09:56.280 --> 01:10:10.280] And he goes completely broke and destitute and bankrupt himself trying to win this case because it needs to be won for the benefit of people rather than the money [01:10:10.280 --> 01:10:18.280] That is a rarity, that's not something that happens often, hell the only other place I've ever seen that happens is in the movie The Pelican Brief [01:10:18.280 --> 01:10:28.280] And where the young attorney sues this guy to protect this swamp land where the endangered brown pelican Louisiana lives, blah, blah, blah [01:10:28.280 --> 01:10:39.280] But the point is usually when an attorney is going for a cause, the cause is always how much money he can make [01:10:39.280 --> 01:10:56.280] And I know people are going to say that's wrong, I'm an attorney and I do this, this, and this, in fact let's see who was the one that John Colt is what he wanted to call himself that wanted to call in and tell me why I was so wrong about all the transportation stuff and blah, blah, blah [01:10:56.280 --> 01:10:58.280] And how much charity work he's done [01:10:58.280 --> 01:11:12.280] You know what, I'm willing to bet you that gentleman is not living in a shack and eating canned beans on a daily basis because he was out doing the right thing when he should be [01:11:12.280 --> 01:11:26.280] I guarantee you he had his hand in somebody's pockets through the course of the years and is living quite comfortably off those ill-gotten gains now, I don't doubt that at all [01:11:26.280 --> 01:11:39.280] The only honest attorney I know has a date on both sides of their headstone [01:11:39.280 --> 01:11:51.280] I haven't met another one yet, not that I can verify, I can give them the benefit of the doubt because I don't know, but I sure as hell can't verify it [01:11:51.280 --> 01:12:09.280] So the point here is when we get into this how are you and I supposed to achieve justice when we're playing poker at a table where everybody is in on the fact that they're using a fixed deck except for you [01:12:09.280 --> 01:12:24.280] Everyone else sitting at the table knows how to read the cards to know exactly what's in your hand while you have no clue what's in theirs and it's usually nothing by the way, they're always bluffing 9 times out of 10 [01:12:24.280 --> 01:12:39.280] But you still can't win the pot, does not matter how good the cards in your hand are most of the time [01:12:39.280 --> 01:12:55.280] Now every now and then if you do all of the things that I tell you to do, you will lock them into a corner where they don't have a choice but to pay out like a bad slot machine finally pays out at some point [01:12:55.280 --> 01:13:07.280] But most of the time they will keep taking your nickels, dimes and dollars for as long as they can and never pay out [01:13:07.280 --> 01:13:23.280] The whole reason the seminar material exists is because I got tired of seeing that same feeding frenzy circle revolving around and around and around [01:13:23.280 --> 01:13:39.280] Where you get pegged for something that you cannot possibly be guilty of doing, you go into a rigged court to answer for something that should never have been alleged against you, you get railroaded through that court by a witness who is lying through their teeth [01:13:39.280 --> 01:13:59.280] Providing testimony as to facts that they have no personal knowledge of and everything you do to object and to get the record made is being undermined by both the judge and the prosecutor working against you to ensure that you have nothing to take to the appeal [01:13:59.280 --> 01:14:23.280] And then they make the appeal process in this case one where you have to pay for the privilege of seeking the appeal. Now get that. This is also the only side of the system where you must pay twice the amount being judged against you to get your right to the appeal [01:14:23.280 --> 01:14:49.280] You understand that? Now personally, they try to say that you don't have a right of appeal in every case. And I say baloney, if anyone is accusing me of wrongdoing, especially the same entity that's prosecuting me and the same entity that's presiding over my case, I have an absolute right to an appeal [01:14:49.280 --> 01:15:07.280] But the system is rigged to make sure that that right is swept under the rug and you have no way at this juncture to enforce it if you can't pay [01:15:07.280 --> 01:15:23.280] Get that. And if you want to get the payment of that bond waived, you have to give them all of your personal financial information in order to do it [01:15:23.280 --> 01:15:43.280] So they're invading your privacy on the one hand to get to the one thing you should have an absolute right to or they're taking your money even though you were never properly convicted because it was a railroad job in a kangaroo court from the very beginning [01:15:43.280 --> 01:16:09.280] And day in and day out they successfully manage to railroad thousands and thousands of people across the nation because the rest of the population is fat, stupid and lazy about anything that matters [01:16:09.280 --> 01:16:19.280] And I don't for the life of me understand that. I really don't. I am not the smartest guy in the room nine times out of ten. I'm not stupid by any means [01:16:19.280 --> 01:16:33.280] But I certainly don't know everything about everything. I've done a lot in my life. I have a very, very wide range of experiences to draw from when I talk about something or do something [01:16:33.280 --> 01:16:49.280] But as my mother used to say, a jack of all trades but a master of none. There's only a few things that I consider myself to be masterful at. This is not one of them but I know far more than the average guy [01:16:49.280 --> 01:16:59.280] And I've learned how to use it and I'm trying to teach it to you but you gotta wake up and listen. Y'all hang on. We'll be right back after the break [01:16:59.280 --> 01:17:08.280] I love Logos. Without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick [01:17:08.280 --> 01:17:21.280] I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplement. How can I help Logos? [01:17:21.280 --> 01:17:34.280] Well I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:44.280] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from Amazon you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No [01:17:44.280 --> 01:17:47.280] Do I have to do anything different when I order? No [01:17:47.280 --> 01:17:56.280] Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect. Thank you so much [01:17:56.280 --> 01:18:05.280] We are welcome. Happy holidays Logos. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:20.280] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris Proven Method. Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [01:18:20.280 --> 01:18:33.280] What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? [01:18:33.280 --> 01:18:49.280] The Michael Maris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com [01:18:49.280 --> 01:19:04.280] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:19:19.280 --> 01:19:37.280] As I walk through the valley of the shadow of Kep, I take a look at my life and realize it touched me up. Cause I've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone. But I ain't never crossed a man that just deserves it. [01:19:37.280 --> 01:19:46.280] Me be treated like a punk, you know that's unheard of. You better watch how you're talking and where you're walking. Are you in your homies might be lying in shock. [01:19:46.280 --> 01:19:55.280] Alright folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio with your host Eddie Craig. [01:19:55.280 --> 01:20:06.280] Now I know I've been going on and normally I take a lot of calls on this show and talk very little. But here lately after all the time I've been off the air for all the various things that have been going on around here. [01:20:06.280 --> 01:20:15.280] Whether it be computer equipment issues or the state bar issues or the administrative law issues that I'm trying to help a friend of mine with etc etc. [01:20:15.280 --> 01:20:20.280] There's just been a lot going on to try to get things the way they need to be. [01:20:20.280 --> 01:20:41.280] The movie came out on December 20th, the grand scam and if you haven't seen it or know about it then go on to Amazon or iTunes and look it up. It's out there and available. I think it's like $9.99 or $95 for the HD version of the movie. [01:20:41.280 --> 01:20:59.280] It's a very decent documentary. It's not really made for people that are really in the know about a lot of stuff but it is definitely information that most people don't know. [01:20:59.280 --> 01:21:13.280] And when I say most I definitely mean those that are still snoozing or in a coma or those that are just beginning to wake up that knows there's something wrong but don't really know the details. [01:21:13.280 --> 01:21:24.280] As the theological side of it would be said it is the milk of the word not the meat as of yet but we are working toward the meat. [01:21:24.280 --> 01:21:37.280] These guys wanted to make sure that this was a subject that people would want to know about and get into so they took it simple the first time to see how far it would go and how popular it would be. [01:21:37.280 --> 01:21:49.280] And if the movie does well enough they will look at making more to enhance and build upon what was in the first one. [01:21:49.280 --> 01:22:02.280] For instance if things pan out Dave Champion wants he and I to do one together that is completely and entirely about the federal income tax. [01:22:02.280 --> 01:22:08.280] And we're going to go into it in a way that's never been done before. [01:22:08.280 --> 01:22:22.280] It will be kind of a mix of most of these the way most of these documentaries you've seen where you have people that are sitting in a room talking and then you have those scenes from on the street where they're talking to other people. [01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:37.280] Well the way Dave and I envision this it will be us on the street talking to each other and other people in front of the various locations where the particular part of the tax we're talking about would be relevant. [01:22:37.280 --> 01:22:47.280] Like downtown Washington DC for instance in front of the Federal Reserve for instance in front of the IRS building for instance in front of the Capitol for instance in front of the White House for instance. [01:22:47.280 --> 01:22:52.280] And Atlanta is Atlantic City or Vegas or some place like that for instance. [01:22:52.280 --> 01:22:55.280] What about the money that people win while they're playing here is that taxable. [01:22:55.280 --> 01:22:58.280] What about over here in this place is that taxable and blah blah blah. [01:22:58.280 --> 01:23:00.280] You know that kind of thing. [01:23:00.280 --> 01:23:10.280] So the more you show support for grand scam the more likely that that second movie is going to get made. [01:23:10.280 --> 01:23:12.280] It's really that simple. [01:23:12.280 --> 01:23:21.280] They're not going to risk their own personal wealth here for what they have to make a bomb. [01:23:21.280 --> 01:23:27.280] These are not Hollywood folks here that have money running out of their ears from various supporters. [01:23:27.280 --> 01:23:36.280] These are people that are putting their own hard earned time and money into making this project and that's the same way the rest of them will be. [01:23:36.280 --> 01:23:46.280] So given that support the movie as best you can please not to make money for me because I don't know how well it's going to do. [01:23:46.280 --> 01:23:53.280] I hope it's great but I'm not looking at that as a way to line my own pockets. [01:23:53.280 --> 01:23:56.280] I didn't even look at getting paid when I said I would do this. [01:23:56.280 --> 01:24:00.280] It was just nice that they told us they were going to give us something for it. [01:24:00.280 --> 01:24:10.280] But at the same time that's all great. I could definitely use the money because if you could see where I live as far as space and things like that. [01:24:10.280 --> 01:24:13.280] Y'all would almost consider me homeless. [01:24:13.280 --> 01:24:15.280] Almost. Not quite. [01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:21.280] I have a dry roof and warm very thin walls but they keep out the water and they keep out the wind. [01:24:21.280 --> 01:24:23.280] So that's something I'm not going to complain. [01:24:23.280 --> 01:24:32.280] Hell I grew up thinking one of these days I'll enjoy living in a refrigerator box but fortunately I don't have to go quite that far. [01:24:32.280 --> 01:24:36.280] But support the movie. If you haven't seen it please go take a look at it. [01:24:36.280 --> 01:24:37.280] Look at the previews for it. [01:24:37.280 --> 01:24:38.280] The previews are on YouTube. [01:24:38.280 --> 01:24:40.280] Grand scam. [01:24:40.280 --> 01:24:41.280] Okay. [01:24:41.280 --> 01:24:43.280] And just go look at it. [01:24:43.280 --> 01:24:50.280] And just remember it's milk not meat not yet but we're trying to build up to that. [01:24:50.280 --> 01:25:03.280] Okay. Now that being said and my second rant on attorneys and why the gallows is too good for them being more or less concluded for this particular show at the moment. [01:25:03.280 --> 01:25:12.280] I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines and let you guys start calling in and get in line on the board so that we can talk about whatever issues you have. [01:25:12.280 --> 01:25:27.280] Now one of these days I'm kind of hoping that we will have a show where there will be people out there that want to call in about what I'm actually talking about rather than just what problem they're facing today. [01:25:27.280 --> 01:25:28.280] And don't get me wrong. [01:25:28.280 --> 01:25:30.280] I don't mind at all that we do that. [01:25:30.280 --> 01:25:44.280] But every now and then it would be really great to be able to keep the show on point when it comes to callers and questions so that we could not lose the theme of what that show is about. [01:25:44.280 --> 01:26:03.280] Last week I definitely went completely through the show for an hour and a half because I did not want to lose that train of thought and theme about the criminality of what is being done to our system of government by the bar associations and attorneys in general. [01:26:03.280 --> 01:26:04.280] I didn't want to lose that. [01:26:04.280 --> 01:26:08.280] So I spent an hour and a half of last week without taking any calls. [01:26:08.280 --> 01:26:15.280] So I've opened the phones up to call in number is 512-646-1984. [01:26:15.280 --> 01:26:29.280] I'm actually surprised after all this time I can still remember that number but I've always kind of had the problem where if I ever dial or say a phone number more than twice it's stuck in my head forever. [01:26:29.280 --> 01:26:31.280] I may not remember who it belongs to. [01:26:31.280 --> 01:26:33.280] I may not remember why I know it. [01:26:33.280 --> 01:26:35.280] But it'll be there. [01:26:35.280 --> 01:26:43.280] And if I ever dial it up I'll remember when someone answers who it belongs to or did belong to. [01:26:43.280 --> 01:27:00.280] So that being said 512-646-1984 if you just want to call in and talk about what I've been talking about or if you just want to call in for whatever reasons you normally call in for or you need help with something that you're calling in for new. [01:27:00.280 --> 01:27:10.280] Okay, so that being said I see we have one caller up on the board and I'm going to guess by what's here that this is Truth Raider. [01:27:10.280 --> 01:27:12.280] Raider is that you? [01:27:12.280 --> 01:27:14.280] That is correct sir. [01:27:14.280 --> 01:27:15.280] Good evening. [01:27:15.280 --> 01:27:16.280] Good evening. [01:27:16.280 --> 01:27:17.280] Can you hear me just fine? [01:27:17.280 --> 01:27:19.280] So far. [01:27:19.280 --> 01:27:32.280] Okay, I'm just going on the cell phone sometimes there's feedback or sometimes there's static or sometimes there's a bit of distortion in this cricket phone. It's a real cheap phone so just want to know I'm coming in loud and clear. [01:27:32.280 --> 01:27:33.280] Okay. [01:27:33.280 --> 01:27:34.280] All righty. [01:27:34.280 --> 01:27:40.280] Well I got pulled over by my local municipal sergeant once again, sergeant Napoleon Bonaparte. [01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:44.280] And given the same ticket of the same three categories. [01:27:44.280 --> 01:27:48.280] License, registration and insurance issues so. [01:27:48.280 --> 01:27:58.280] But all the motions into the court, as you felt me to do, you would put in there, even put in a request for a hearing on the matter. [01:27:58.280 --> 01:28:00.280] For a subject matter. [01:28:00.280 --> 01:28:12.280] And trying to get the case dismissed on the basis of the officer did not establish personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction to initiate the traffic stop in the first place. [01:28:12.280 --> 01:28:19.280] Do you realize at some point you have a harassment suit when he keeps getting beat on the same things over and over again and still keeps doing it? [01:28:19.280 --> 01:28:21.280] That becomes harassment. [01:28:21.280 --> 01:28:23.280] Right. [01:28:23.280 --> 01:28:26.280] Now this is strike three. [01:28:26.280 --> 01:28:28.280] So I'm looking into that. [01:28:28.280 --> 01:28:30.280] I am definitely looking into that. [01:28:30.280 --> 01:28:35.280] But I have the other case to take care of is you know it's the old case that had for nearly two and a half years now. [01:28:35.280 --> 01:28:37.280] So I'm trying to get that taken care of. [01:28:37.280 --> 01:28:41.280] Learn how to do that one correctly as I'm doing it. [01:28:41.280 --> 01:28:46.280] And once I become successful at that, I'm just going to go after them for the harassment. [01:28:46.280 --> 01:28:50.280] And then I'll have a state case coming up because I got pulled over during the summer. [01:28:50.280 --> 01:28:53.280] This is after the last time that you were on regularly. [01:28:53.280 --> 01:28:57.280] You were off for a few months there, had some unfortunate problems with your computer. [01:28:57.280 --> 01:29:00.280] I got stopped by the state troopers. [01:29:00.280 --> 01:29:04.280] So I think I'm going to file a Title 42 for that one. [01:29:04.280 --> 01:29:06.280] That's involving assuming the state. [01:29:06.280 --> 01:29:13.280] There is a so-called statutory law or whatever it is. [01:29:13.280 --> 01:29:15.280] As you say, it's not law. [01:29:15.280 --> 01:29:17.280] They're just codes and rules. [01:29:17.280 --> 01:29:20.280] So we must so-called buy-buy. [01:29:20.280 --> 01:29:31.280] But it's a statutory code named 780 and that grants officers the provision to impound automobiles off the road at their own discretion. [01:29:31.280 --> 01:29:35.280] And that's what they did to me. [01:29:35.280 --> 01:29:41.280] Well, but under what conditions are they allowed to use their own discretion? [01:29:41.280 --> 01:29:49.280] They can only impound the car that falls within the purview of the Oregon Statutes for Transportation. [01:29:49.280 --> 01:29:53.280] If your car doesn't, then the impoundment's illegal. [01:29:53.280 --> 01:29:56.280] Hang on, Raider. I got a break here, so just hang on just a minute. [01:29:56.280 --> 01:30:00.280] Folks will be right back, so y'all hang on. [01:30:00.280 --> 01:30:05.280] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth. [01:30:05.280 --> 01:30:08.280] But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. [01:30:08.280 --> 01:30:12.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment. [01:30:12.280 --> 01:30:19.280] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information. [01:30:19.280 --> 01:30:20.280] That's creepy. [01:30:20.280 --> 01:30:22.280] But it doesn't have to be that way. [01:30:22.280 --> 01:30:32.280] StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine. StartPage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and their third party certified. [01:30:32.280 --> 01:30:39.280] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with StartPage. Great search results and total privacy. [01:30:39.280 --> 01:30:42.280] StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:30:42.280 --> 01:30:45.280] Forms, forms, forms. They're everywhere. [01:30:45.280 --> 01:30:49.280] But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it. [01:30:49.280 --> 01:30:56.280] I lay blank spaces on forms all the time or I write N slash A for not applicable and usually nobody notices or cares. [01:30:56.280 --> 01:31:03.280] I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement. [01:31:03.280 --> 01:31:08.280] And I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me. [01:31:08.280 --> 01:31:09.280] And that's pretty rare. [01:31:09.280 --> 01:31:14.280] To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests. [01:31:14.280 --> 01:31:18.280] It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it. [01:31:18.280 --> 01:31:23.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:49.280 --> 01:31:51.280] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:51.280 --> 01:31:52.280] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:52.280 --> 01:31:53.280] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:56.280] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:56.280 --> 01:31:58.280] We're Americans and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.280 --> 01:32:22.280] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:29.280 --> 01:32:39.280] To handle your claim and your roof right the first time, just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:39.280 --> 01:32:46.280] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:46.280 --> 01:32:51.280] So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. [01:32:51.280 --> 01:32:57.280] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:57.280 --> 01:32:59.280] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:59.280 --> 01:33:28.280] I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:29.280 --> 01:33:57.280] All right folks, we are back. [01:33:57.280 --> 01:33:59.280] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:59.280 --> 01:34:08.280] The calling number is 512-646-1984 and we are talking with Truth Raider. [01:34:08.280 --> 01:34:10.280] All right, Raider, go ahead. [01:34:10.280 --> 01:34:13.280] All right, I'll just make it brief in case there's anybody else calling in. [01:34:13.280 --> 01:34:16.280] I just want to take too much more of your time and just give you an update on what's going on. [01:34:16.280 --> 01:34:24.280] So on March 28, 2018, once again, I have another military tribunal this time, of course, with my city municipal court. [01:34:24.280 --> 01:34:30.280] I'm going to say things from written citation complaints that is not a charge against me. [01:34:30.280 --> 01:34:33.280] As you said, it's just a complaint or much, not much more. [01:34:33.280 --> 01:34:44.280] Not much more than a notice to the judge to be brought via my revenue in a tribunal court, basically. [01:34:44.280 --> 01:34:46.280] There's no trial. [01:34:46.280 --> 01:34:47.280] There's no jury. [01:34:47.280 --> 01:34:49.280] There is no victim. [01:34:49.280 --> 01:34:50.280] There's no damages. [01:34:50.280 --> 01:34:52.280] There's no case. [01:34:52.280 --> 01:34:55.280] So that's what I want you to know about that. [01:34:55.280 --> 01:34:58.280] It could be March 28, so we can do the same things again. [01:34:58.280 --> 01:35:06.280] And one thing different is I just want to demand a hearing and challenge the court's jurisdiction at every step. [01:35:06.280 --> 01:35:09.280] It's constantly just going to bang away, challenging the jurisdiction. [01:35:09.280 --> 01:35:11.280] Where's the evidence? [01:35:11.280 --> 01:35:18.280] They say they go by the preponderance of the evidence, but what do you take on that? [01:35:18.280 --> 01:35:22.280] What do you take on the preponderance of the evidence? [01:35:22.280 --> 01:35:24.280] Well, that's civil. [01:35:24.280 --> 01:35:25.280] Okay. [01:35:25.280 --> 01:35:26.280] Okay. [01:35:26.280 --> 01:35:27.280] All right. [01:35:27.280 --> 01:35:33.280] Now look, I know we've had this conversation before and I'm about to get mean again. [01:35:33.280 --> 01:35:40.280] And you're going to know why I'm getting mean again because you're asking me stuff you already know better than to ask me again. [01:35:40.280 --> 01:35:41.280] And here's what that is. [01:35:41.280 --> 01:35:43.280] People may not know about that. [01:35:43.280 --> 01:35:48.280] They may not know about it, but there's archives that'll keep me from having to repeat myself so damn often. [01:35:48.280 --> 01:35:49.280] Okay. [01:35:49.280 --> 01:35:50.280] Yeah. [01:35:50.280 --> 01:35:51.280] Sure. [01:35:51.280 --> 01:35:54.280] This is civil in Oregon. [01:35:54.280 --> 01:35:57.280] They are civil in fractions. [01:35:57.280 --> 01:36:01.280] They are not criminal offenses. [01:36:01.280 --> 01:36:20.280] There can never be a lawful basis for making a warrantless arrest or seizure of any person or property without criminal conduct, which a civil infraction does not have. [01:36:20.280 --> 01:36:37.280] There is no element of criminality whatsoever in order to provide the officer with either reasonable suspicion of a crime or probable cause to believe that there is a crime afoot. [01:36:37.280 --> 01:36:50.280] Therefore, any seizure of person or property is constitutionally invalid. [01:36:50.280 --> 01:36:51.280] All right. [01:36:51.280 --> 01:36:55.280] I was in here in court and I said the very same thing. [01:36:55.280 --> 01:36:57.280] Seizure was totally unlawful. [01:36:57.280 --> 01:37:03.280] There was no criminal elements to prove, no damages to anyone, no suspicion of any. [01:37:03.280 --> 01:37:04.280] Okay. [01:37:04.280 --> 01:37:05.280] Stop, stop, stop. [01:37:05.280 --> 01:37:09.280] Stop, stop, stop. [01:37:09.280 --> 01:37:18.280] Where did you hear me say a damned thing about damages or anything else? [01:37:18.280 --> 01:37:21.280] Criminal offenses, but not damages, but that's just what I was saying. [01:37:21.280 --> 01:37:26.280] No, no, no. [01:37:26.280 --> 01:37:31.280] You are kicking up mud in your drinking water, Raider. [01:37:31.280 --> 01:37:34.280] Stop it. [01:37:34.280 --> 01:37:42.280] The only thing you need to say is there was no criminal conduct. [01:37:42.280 --> 01:37:56.280] Therefore, no probable cause, no reasonable suspicion could have possibly existed to allow a warrantless seizure or arrest of any kind. [01:37:56.280 --> 01:37:59.280] End of discussion. [01:37:59.280 --> 01:38:04.280] There is nothing else that has to be said or argued. [01:38:04.280 --> 01:38:14.280] The more you say beyond that, the more likely you are to say something that they can use to say you made a bad argument. [01:38:14.280 --> 01:38:19.280] Shut up while you're ahead. [01:38:19.280 --> 01:38:33.280] See, there's a reason that trial lawyers know not only what to say, but when to sit down and stop asking questions. [01:38:33.280 --> 01:38:35.280] Okay? [01:38:35.280 --> 01:38:40.280] Other than the seven interrogatories, they must ask the office. [01:38:40.280 --> 01:38:53.280] The interrogatories are to be put into written discovery, which you can then cross-examine the officer on once you're in court. [01:38:53.280 --> 01:38:54.280] Right. [01:38:54.280 --> 01:39:01.280] But they all go to what? [01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:04.280] You don't define when to sit, I thought I was looking for the court. [01:39:04.280 --> 01:39:07.280] No. [01:39:07.280 --> 01:39:19.280] The seven interrogatories dealing with civil infractions all go to what particularity of law? [01:39:19.280 --> 01:39:21.280] Criminal law. [01:39:21.280 --> 01:39:25.280] Criminal conduct. [01:39:25.280 --> 01:39:31.280] And the lack of said criminal conduct. [01:39:31.280 --> 01:39:41.280] The lack of probable cause or reasonable suspicion to make a warrantless seizure, detention or arrest. [01:39:41.280 --> 01:39:44.280] You see, here's the thing. [01:39:44.280 --> 01:39:58.280] Not even an investigative detention is valid without criminal conduct. [01:39:58.280 --> 01:40:08.280] So the seven interrogatories all go to establishing that criminal conduct was absolutely nonexistent. [01:40:08.280 --> 01:40:21.280] Therefore, lawful authority to make a warrantless seizure, detention or arrest was also nonexistent. [01:40:21.280 --> 01:40:33.280] Why do you think you need to go beyond that argument and dwell on injury or damage to anything or anyone? [01:40:33.280 --> 01:40:42.280] Like the basis for anything, having the proceedings because there was no harm done to anyone, no criminal conduct, or any loss to anything. [01:40:42.280 --> 01:40:44.280] You would really suck on jeopardy. [01:40:44.280 --> 01:40:48.280] You know that? [01:40:48.280 --> 01:40:54.280] That's a rhetorical question and you still tried to answer it. [01:40:54.280 --> 01:40:56.280] Therein lies your problem. [01:40:56.280 --> 01:41:06.280] You do not understand the words shut up while you're ahead. [01:41:06.280 --> 01:41:20.280] You'd better figure that one out because there's nothing worse than losing because you dug the hole they buried you in. [01:41:20.280 --> 01:41:21.280] Alright. [01:41:21.280 --> 01:41:22.280] Okay? [01:41:22.280 --> 01:41:24.280] I'll keep it real simple. [01:41:24.280 --> 01:41:26.280] That would be a good idea. [01:41:26.280 --> 01:41:37.280] It's the reason there's seven interrogatories and not 17 or 70. [01:41:37.280 --> 01:41:38.280] I don't know. [01:41:38.280 --> 01:41:45.280] The other case I'll be dealing with in the next two years, I have about a year, probably a year and a half, filed suit against the state. [01:41:45.280 --> 01:41:47.280] That's the state. [01:41:47.280 --> 01:41:51.280] You can't file suit against the state. [01:41:51.280 --> 01:42:00.280] You can file suit against the state actor in their personal capacity, sometimes in their official capacity. [01:42:00.280 --> 01:42:06.280] But you better understand when and where you can do either one successfully. [01:42:06.280 --> 01:42:07.280] Okay. [01:42:07.280 --> 01:42:11.280] So I'll go after Barney Pfeiffer and his policy. [01:42:11.280 --> 01:42:14.280] Something like that. [01:42:14.280 --> 01:42:21.280] But I had a rookie that had dug five other additional state troopers at the scene just for that stop. [01:42:21.280 --> 01:42:27.280] He thought they captured a gang member or America's most wanted. [01:42:27.280 --> 01:42:28.280] And? [01:42:28.280 --> 01:42:30.280] He's my property. [01:42:30.280 --> 01:42:33.280] We're seizing your vehicle. [01:42:33.280 --> 01:42:35.280] Any questions? [01:42:35.280 --> 01:42:36.280] Yeah. [01:42:36.280 --> 01:42:44.280] What criminal conduct are you associating me or my car with in order to seize it without a warrant or probable cause? [01:42:44.280 --> 01:42:46.280] That should have been your question. [01:42:46.280 --> 01:42:47.280] Yeah. [01:42:47.280 --> 01:42:50.280] Well, the answer to that is you're in violation of... [01:42:50.280 --> 01:42:51.280] No, no, no. [01:42:51.280 --> 01:42:54.280] Did you ask them those questions? [01:42:54.280 --> 01:42:55.280] Yeah. [01:42:55.280 --> 01:42:58.280] What criminal? [01:42:58.280 --> 01:42:59.280] What criminal acts? [01:42:59.280 --> 01:43:01.280] What warrant do you have? [01:43:01.280 --> 01:43:05.280] What surrogate will probable cause? [01:43:05.280 --> 01:43:06.280] Okay. [01:43:06.280 --> 01:43:09.280] And so they said a violation that's a civil infraction? [01:43:09.280 --> 01:43:10.280] Correct. [01:43:10.280 --> 01:43:12.280] They just went on to just re-enterate it. [01:43:12.280 --> 01:43:13.280] Okay. [01:43:13.280 --> 01:43:14.280] Then they were stupid. [01:43:14.280 --> 01:43:17.280] That means you need those recordings. [01:43:17.280 --> 01:43:18.280] Right. [01:43:18.280 --> 01:43:19.280] Yeah. [01:43:19.280 --> 01:43:21.280] And they actually record the state police does have dash cams. [01:43:21.280 --> 01:43:23.280] Well, then get them. [01:43:23.280 --> 01:43:25.280] Yeah. [01:43:25.280 --> 01:43:30.280] The other agencies, the Department of Border Offices, don't have them in there. [01:43:30.280 --> 01:43:39.280] You have to record all of those and I have three cameras in my automobile to record all of those. [01:43:39.280 --> 01:43:40.280] All right. [01:43:40.280 --> 01:43:41.280] Well, here comes the break. [01:43:41.280 --> 01:43:42.280] So I don't have anything else to do. [01:43:42.280 --> 01:43:43.280] Okay. [01:43:43.280 --> 01:43:44.280] Well, that's good. [01:43:44.280 --> 01:43:46.280] I'll get the next person in line then. [01:43:46.280 --> 01:43:47.280] All right. [01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:48.280] All right. [01:43:48.280 --> 01:43:49.280] Have a good evening. [01:43:49.280 --> 01:43:50.280] Thanks for calling in. [01:43:50.280 --> 01:43:51.280] All right, folks. [01:43:51.280 --> 01:43:52.280] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:43:52.280 --> 01:43:59.280] Y'all hang on and we will be right back to take the rest of the cars. [01:43:59.280 --> 01:44:05.280] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:44:05.280 --> 01:44:08.280] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method. [01:44:08.280 --> 01:44:14.280] Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [01:44:14.280 --> 01:44:20.280] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute. [01:44:20.280 --> 01:44:24.280] What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? [01:44:24.280 --> 01:44:26.280] How to answer letters and phone calls? [01:44:26.280 --> 01:44:28.280] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? [01:44:28.280 --> 01:44:33.280] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? [01:44:33.280 --> 01:44:38.280] The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:44:38.280 --> 01:44:40.280] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:44:40.280 --> 01:44:46.280] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner [01:44:46.280 --> 01:44:49.280] or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com. [01:44:49.280 --> 01:44:57.280] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. [01:44:57.280 --> 01:45:00.280] To learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:45:00.280 --> 01:45:03.280] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:03.280 --> 01:45:07.280] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [01:45:07.280 --> 01:45:13.280] the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, [01:45:13.280 --> 01:45:15.280] step-by-step. [01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:18.280] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:18.280 --> 01:45:22.280] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:22.280 --> 01:45:27.280] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:27.280 --> 01:45:34.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.280 --> 01:45:38.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:38.280 --> 01:45:43.280] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.280 --> 01:45:47.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [01:45:47.280 --> 01:45:52.280] forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.280 --> 01:45:56.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. [01:45:56.280 --> 01:46:25.280] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY. [01:46:26.280 --> 01:46:55.280] All right, folks. [01:46:55.280 --> 01:46:56.280] We are back. [01:46:56.280 --> 01:46:58.280] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. [01:46:58.280 --> 01:47:02.280] We are now into the last segment, and we've got three callers up on the board, [01:47:02.280 --> 01:47:04.280] and I'm going to try to get to everybody. [01:47:04.280 --> 01:47:08.280] So if you haven't called in and you're not one of these three, you're not on yet, [01:47:08.280 --> 01:47:12.280] you're not one of these three, so just please let me get through these guys, [01:47:12.280 --> 01:47:14.280] because I'm not going to have the time to get to everybody. [01:47:14.280 --> 01:47:18.280] So real quick, as fast as we can, let's get through what these callers need. [01:47:18.280 --> 01:47:22.280] Ramadan, what can we do for you? [01:47:22.280 --> 01:47:24.280] Hey, how you doing, Eddie? [01:47:24.280 --> 01:47:26.280] How about you? [01:47:26.280 --> 01:47:28.280] All right, good to talk to you again. [01:47:28.280 --> 01:47:37.280] I had a callback back in June and stuff, and I had an unmarked car. [01:47:37.280 --> 01:47:50.280] You were telling me to challenge the constitutionality of the ability to read the license plate, [01:47:50.280 --> 01:47:52.280] but I agreed with you. [01:47:52.280 --> 01:47:54.280] No, no, no, no, no, no. [01:47:54.280 --> 01:47:56.280] Now, get it right if you're going to make the argument. [01:47:56.280 --> 01:47:59.280] It's not the ability to read the license plate. [01:47:59.280 --> 01:48:04.280] It's the ability to access the information attached to the license plate. [01:48:04.280 --> 01:48:12.280] The difference there being accessing those central databases without probable cause. [01:48:12.280 --> 01:48:19.280] The license plate reader cannot possibly have probable cause. [01:48:19.280 --> 01:48:23.280] It has no way to establish probable cause. [01:48:23.280 --> 01:48:25.280] Well, it wasn't the license plate reader. [01:48:25.280 --> 01:48:26.280] He read it on his own. [01:48:26.280 --> 01:48:28.280] He just, he had it on my car. [01:48:28.280 --> 01:48:30.280] He just got up close behind me. [01:48:30.280 --> 01:48:34.280] Now, he lied in his report that he pulled up beside me to make sure it was me, [01:48:34.280 --> 01:48:38.280] but no, he just looked at the back of the scene, the back of my head, [01:48:38.280 --> 01:48:43.280] just saw a copy that was black and that was good enough for him. [01:48:43.280 --> 01:48:47.280] But I did go after the, you told me to go after his own car. [01:48:47.280 --> 01:48:52.280] I did strongly after that because I wanted to go straight for the head and just chop it off. [01:48:52.280 --> 01:48:57.280] And the state law there forbid them to use unmarked cars? [01:48:57.280 --> 01:49:00.280] For a traffic enforcement, yes. [01:49:00.280 --> 01:49:05.280] And I had three, I looked up two different statues that actually can explain that. [01:49:05.280 --> 01:49:09.280] One of them was in their own title, Title 38 of Public Offices and Employees, [01:49:09.280 --> 01:49:13.280] and the exemption statues, the subsection A was for the governor. [01:49:13.280 --> 01:49:19.280] Subsection B was for a political governmental body to grant permission, [01:49:19.280 --> 01:49:24.280] and they had to have an application stating the nature of the car, [01:49:24.280 --> 01:49:29.280] the vehicle, big model, VIN number and all of what have you, [01:49:29.280 --> 01:49:32.280] on file at the city managers. [01:49:32.280 --> 01:49:36.280] Not only that, there was just two months prior to that stop, [01:49:36.280 --> 01:49:42.280] the city council issued a report to state that they had to go back to the statues. [01:49:42.280 --> 01:49:47.280] Now, the other statute is in the transportation code. [01:49:47.280 --> 01:49:54.280] The transportation code says that they can have basically for the felony alluding statute, [01:49:54.280 --> 01:49:58.280] it says decal markings are required. [01:49:58.280 --> 01:50:02.280] So a person could not be charged with a classified felony of alluding, [01:50:02.280 --> 01:50:09.280] which says willfully flee or attempt to elude an emergency vehicle that had the authority [01:50:09.280 --> 01:50:14.280] in the state of an emergency. [01:50:14.280 --> 01:50:23.280] But I had trial, just like you always explain, and they railroad you. [01:50:23.280 --> 01:50:26.280] But I was kind of prepared, but I wasn't too prepared. [01:50:26.280 --> 01:50:32.280] But I did make it known that the state needs to prove the lawful authority of this on our vehicle. [01:50:32.280 --> 01:50:35.280] And so you are so right. [01:50:35.280 --> 01:50:42.280] I don't know if they did even read the motions or he just attempted to just make my words. [01:50:42.280 --> 01:50:47.280] But he just said, I have wrote a motion that said lack of lawful, I mean, [01:50:47.280 --> 01:50:50.280] not for lack of jurisdiction, but I put it in the wrong context. [01:50:50.280 --> 01:50:56.280] The body of the motion explained how the vehicle was illegal according to the statutes [01:50:56.280 --> 01:50:58.280] in the city council report. [01:50:58.280 --> 01:51:01.280] And he just saw the title said lack of jurisdiction. [01:51:01.280 --> 01:51:05.280] And he just went with that said the court has jurisdiction all this. [01:51:05.280 --> 01:51:07.280] And I was like, this judge is going to eat this up. [01:51:07.280 --> 01:51:08.280] Wow. [01:51:08.280 --> 01:51:10.280] I can't believe this. [01:51:10.280 --> 01:51:11.280] Whatever. [01:51:11.280 --> 01:51:13.280] And I said, I don't even think he read the motion. [01:51:13.280 --> 01:51:16.280] I really don't even think I don't think the judge read the motion. [01:51:16.280 --> 01:51:22.280] Yeah, that's why I said one of my favorite tactics when it comes to these judges that say they've read it. [01:51:22.280 --> 01:51:26.280] Did you even read the part in there where I accused you and the prosecutor of both being biased [01:51:26.280 --> 01:51:30.280] and prejudicial against the defense because you're sleeping together? [01:51:30.280 --> 01:51:34.280] And it doesn't matter if they're both men or both women or a mix. [01:51:34.280 --> 01:51:35.280] It doesn't matter. [01:51:35.280 --> 01:51:36.280] You say something like that. [01:51:36.280 --> 01:51:37.280] What? [01:51:37.280 --> 01:51:38.280] I didn't see that in here. [01:51:38.280 --> 01:51:39.280] Where is that? [01:51:39.280 --> 01:51:43.280] Well, I don't remember exactly what pages it on, but I'll wait for you to read through it to see if you can, [01:51:43.280 --> 01:51:45.280] if you can find it again. [01:51:45.280 --> 01:51:46.280] Well, I didn't see it. [01:51:46.280 --> 01:51:47.280] No, they didn't. [01:51:47.280 --> 01:51:51.280] How dare you put something like that in there and says, well, obviously if you didn't see it, [01:51:51.280 --> 01:51:53.280] then you didn't read it. [01:51:53.280 --> 01:51:58.280] So I will now wait for you to actually read it since you've now admitted on the record you never did [01:51:58.280 --> 01:52:03.280] and was going to deny it out of hand anyway. [01:52:03.280 --> 01:52:04.280] Right. [01:52:04.280 --> 01:52:08.280] Well, I appealed the case. [01:52:08.280 --> 01:52:15.280] I think I talked to Randy a couple of weeks ago and he said it sounded like I was in good shape. [01:52:15.280 --> 01:52:26.280] He, but basically in his epilebrate, I stuck to certain matters about that. [01:52:26.280 --> 01:52:31.280] But mainly I stuck to the unmarked vehicle and explain why. [01:52:31.280 --> 01:52:40.280] And his appellate brief is like 10 pages of BF basically saying how we didn't know about, well, here it states this. [01:52:40.280 --> 01:52:46.280] He wrote, and now when you say his appellate brief, who's appellate brief? [01:52:46.280 --> 01:52:48.280] The prosecutors. [01:52:48.280 --> 01:52:49.280] Okay. [01:52:49.280 --> 01:52:53.280] Because you said Randy and you went right into appellate brief and I'm like, okay. [01:52:53.280 --> 01:52:56.280] I'm sorry. [01:52:56.280 --> 01:53:02.280] Now he told me that I was in, Randy told me that I was in good shape when I explained to him the situation. [01:53:02.280 --> 01:53:03.280] Right. [01:53:03.280 --> 01:53:09.280] Now the prosecutors appellate brief, he wrote, in the multitude of cases addressing traffic stuff, [01:53:09.280 --> 01:53:15.280] the state is unable to recall any that focused on the patrol vehicle decal. [01:53:15.280 --> 01:53:19.280] That's because they never found it or never tried to even look for it. [01:53:19.280 --> 01:53:28.280] And as it relates to sufficiency of the evidence, none of the violations that issues reference and get patrol vehicles decal. [01:53:28.280 --> 01:53:35.280] Apart from the makeup of the patrol vehicle, the appellate does not otherwise challenge the elements underlying the conviction. [01:53:35.280 --> 01:53:37.280] And they go into the charges. [01:53:37.280 --> 01:53:40.280] But I think I just have a case though. [01:53:40.280 --> 01:53:46.280] I think if it's going to be rolled out because they have to dismiss the case, they, you know, this is something. [01:53:46.280 --> 01:53:55.280] Well, the cop can't be acting in an unlawful capacity in order to enforce a law lawfully. [01:53:55.280 --> 01:53:58.280] That's a contradiction in terms. [01:53:58.280 --> 01:54:00.280] Right. [01:54:00.280 --> 01:54:12.280] That's like saying a cop is authorized to murder a civilian just so he can keep his cover with the mob intact because he's under cover with the mob. [01:54:12.280 --> 01:54:17.280] Yeah, that's a big contradiction. [01:54:17.280 --> 01:54:26.280] The only difference in the two acts is severity, but it's the same principle. [01:54:26.280 --> 01:54:27.280] Okay. [01:54:27.280 --> 01:54:28.280] So anyway, I'm sorry. [01:54:28.280 --> 01:54:30.280] I'm getting really short on time here and I need to move on. [01:54:30.280 --> 01:54:35.280] So what do you need to ask me? [01:54:35.280 --> 01:54:48.280] Well, I guess another specific question to see how, well, I didn't realize that I didn't think that I'd have to be short on time, but I just want to know what you thought of it. [01:54:48.280 --> 01:54:55.280] Well, if you made the argument, the only thing you did a motion for new trial and all that good stuff, right? [01:54:55.280 --> 01:54:57.280] No, I didn't do a motion for new trial. [01:54:57.280 --> 01:55:06.280] Well, I don't know what all the rules in Arizona here is, but here you'd have to do first a motion for new trial and then you'd do an appellate brief, which is essentially the same arguments. [01:55:06.280 --> 01:55:08.280] Well, it was a court of record. [01:55:08.280 --> 01:55:24.280] So the Superior Court is the one to have it and they're going to, it says according to the statutes and the court rules that they either do a vertical acquittal or they just, they forgot. [01:55:24.280 --> 01:55:27.280] But I'll just wait it out. [01:55:27.280 --> 01:55:28.280] Okay. [01:55:28.280 --> 01:55:29.280] I think I'm in pretty good shape. [01:55:29.280 --> 01:55:30.280] Well, you should be. [01:55:30.280 --> 01:55:36.280] If you made the argument and they just didn't read it, that doesn't make the conviction valid. [01:55:36.280 --> 01:55:37.280] Exactly. [01:55:37.280 --> 01:55:45.280] And then I'm going to buy the jurisdictionary and see if I have a case for taking them up on a civil suit. [01:55:45.280 --> 01:55:46.280] Okay. [01:55:46.280 --> 01:55:48.280] Well, I would do that. [01:55:48.280 --> 01:55:49.280] Okay, Robin, I'm sorry. [01:55:49.280 --> 01:55:50.280] I'm down to three minutes, man. [01:55:50.280 --> 01:55:53.280] So let me get one of these other callers at least. [01:55:53.280 --> 01:55:54.280] Okay. [01:55:54.280 --> 01:55:55.280] Thank you, Eddie. [01:55:55.280 --> 01:55:56.280] All right. [01:55:56.280 --> 01:55:57.280] Thanks for calling in. [01:55:57.280 --> 01:55:58.280] All right. [01:55:58.280 --> 01:55:59.280] Now we have Pat in Texas. [01:55:59.280 --> 01:56:02.280] Pat, what can we do for you? [01:56:02.280 --> 01:56:03.280] Even Randy. [01:56:03.280 --> 01:56:07.280] Randy, Eddie, good to hear your voice again on the radio. [01:56:07.280 --> 01:56:08.280] You too. [01:56:08.280 --> 01:56:12.280] I'm glad y'all are still out there working and doing. [01:56:12.280 --> 01:56:13.280] Yeah. [01:56:13.280 --> 01:56:19.280] Did you get the email from my wife about the list of trained certified? [01:56:19.280 --> 01:56:20.280] I did. [01:56:20.280 --> 01:56:23.280] And I replied back thinking her very much for that. [01:56:23.280 --> 01:56:30.280] I also got her mail and tell her thank you for that as well. [01:56:30.280 --> 01:56:31.280] Good, good. [01:56:31.280 --> 01:56:34.280] She was asking me if I had a chance to ask you. [01:56:34.280 --> 01:56:35.280] Yeah. [01:56:35.280 --> 01:56:39.280] Now folks, just in case you don't know who this is, this is Pat that used to hang from the water tower to call us. [01:56:39.280 --> 01:56:42.280] So he'd actually have signal reception on his cell phone. [01:56:42.280 --> 01:56:52.280] This is also the gentleman that I helped beat a felony evading charge that he was being falsely accused of. [01:56:52.280 --> 01:57:01.280] That his bar paid attorney would not make the arguments for and was going to throw him under the bus on. [01:57:01.280 --> 01:57:04.280] In fact, tried to throw him under the bus on. [01:57:04.280 --> 01:57:12.280] He accused us of being Republic of Texas movement members. [01:57:12.280 --> 01:57:16.280] All because you asked him to use the law to fight your case. [01:57:16.280 --> 01:57:17.280] Yeah. [01:57:17.280 --> 01:57:20.280] But that's a whole other side. [01:57:20.280 --> 01:57:31.280] Did you see the newspaper article about the court, I think it's in Ohio that overturned all the- [01:57:31.280 --> 01:57:33.280] The red light camera citations? [01:57:33.280 --> 01:57:34.280] Tickets? [01:57:34.280 --> 01:57:37.280] Yeah, and then told the municipality they had to pay them all back. [01:57:37.280 --> 01:57:40.280] Yeah, that's beautiful case law. [01:57:40.280 --> 01:57:41.280] Yep. [01:57:41.280 --> 01:57:42.280] I think it's fantastic. [01:57:42.280 --> 01:57:45.280] It's something you've been pounding on for a number of years. [01:57:45.280 --> 01:57:46.280] That is very true. [01:57:46.280 --> 01:57:50.280] I've said they were unconstitutional from day one. [01:57:50.280 --> 01:57:52.280] Yeah, that's all I needed. [01:57:52.280 --> 01:57:54.280] I'm glad to hear your voice again. [01:57:54.280 --> 01:57:55.280] I didn't make it last week. [01:57:55.280 --> 01:57:57.280] I was somewhere else. [01:57:57.280 --> 01:58:03.280] Well, I'm actually glad I made it last week and this week considering all the stuff going on in the neighborhood tonight. [01:58:03.280 --> 01:58:07.280] But it's good to hear y'all too and you and Ms. Metta take care, okay? [01:58:07.280 --> 01:58:09.280] And thank you both again. [01:58:09.280 --> 01:58:10.280] You have a good one. [01:58:10.280 --> 01:58:11.280] All right, you too. [01:58:11.280 --> 01:58:12.280] Bye. [01:58:12.280 --> 01:58:13.280] Brett, I'm sorry, man. [01:58:13.280 --> 01:58:14.280] I am out of time. [01:58:14.280 --> 01:58:18.280] If you really need to talk to me, send me an email or hit me up on Facebook. [01:58:18.280 --> 01:58:21.280] If you're the Brett from Facebook, if not, do the email and we'll go from there. [01:58:21.280 --> 01:58:22.280] All right, folks. [01:58:22.280 --> 01:58:26.280] This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. [01:58:26.280 --> 01:58:30.280] I want to thank you all so much for listening in and supporting the show. [01:58:30.280 --> 01:58:35.280] We are trying to get back on a regular show basis here, so please keep that in mind and keep listening. [01:58:35.280 --> 01:58:36.280] Y'all have a great week. [01:58:36.280 --> 01:58:38.280] Good night and God bless. [01:58:38.280 --> 01:58:56.280] Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.280 --> 01:58:57.280] Recovery Version. [01:58:57.280 --> 01:59:02.280] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.280 --> 01:59:08.280] says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.280 --> 01:59:11.280] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.280 --> 01:59:20.280] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.280 --> 01:59:26.280] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus [01:59:26.280 --> 01:59:30.280] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.280 --> 01:59:32.280] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.280 --> 01:59:40.280] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.280 --> 01:59:49.280] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.280 --> 01:59:52.280] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.280 --> 01:59:54.280] You found it. [01:59:54.280 --> 02:00:00.280] LogosRadioNetwork.com