[00:00.000 --> 00:05.400]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:05.400 --> 00:12.560]  Markets for Monday, 3 July 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,219.35 an ounce, silver
[00:12.560 --> 00:21.000]  $16.11 an ounce, Texas Crude $46.04 a barrel, and Bitcoin is sitting at about $2,550 US
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  currency.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.600]  Today in History, the year 1988, the United States Navy warship, the USS Svincinus, under
[00:32.600 --> 00:37.960]  the command of William C. Rogers III, shot down a Iranian air passenger flight 655 from
[00:37.960 --> 00:42.920]  Tehran to Dubai over Iran's airspace and territorial waters in the Persian Gulf.
[00:42.920 --> 00:48.960]  All 290 passengers aboard the Airbus A300 were killed by the detonation of the SM-2MR
[00:48.960 --> 00:50.600]  surface-to-air missile.
[00:50.600 --> 00:58.480]  In recent news, Robert David Steele, listed on Wikipedia as a former CIA clandestine
[00:58.480 --> 01:03.480]  service case officer, was a guest on Infowars Alex Jones Show, where he claimed last Thursday
[01:03.480 --> 01:07.800]  that NASA is not only operating colonies on Mars, but populating those colonies with
[01:07.800 --> 01:09.640]  kidnapped children slaves.
[01:09.640 --> 01:13.880]  Jones weighed in on NASA during the program, stating that 90% of NASA's missions are
[01:13.880 --> 01:19.240]  secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers he said that you have no idea.
[01:19.240 --> 01:23.280]  It seems even more out of this world is NASA responding to the Alex Jones Show, with NASA
[01:23.280 --> 01:27.800]  spokesperson Guy Webster telling the Daily Beast the same day that, quote, there are
[01:27.800 --> 01:32.400]  no humans on Mars, there are active rovers on Mars, there was a rumor going around last
[01:32.400 --> 01:35.720]  week that there weren't, but there are, but there are no humans.
[01:35.720 --> 01:42.440]  It seems Infowars and Alex Jones are being listened to by a lot of important people.
[01:42.440 --> 01:46.640]  The University of Exeter released a new study by Professor Charles Tyler, which catalogs
[01:46.640 --> 01:50.960]  how male freshwater fish in Britain are turning into females due to the chemicals released
[01:50.960 --> 01:56.120]  into the water from birth control pills, cosmetic makeup, cleaning agents, and plastics all
[01:56.120 --> 01:58.160]  being flushed down the drains.
[01:58.160 --> 02:02.920]  The study found that one-fifth of males, or 20% of the male fish population, were now
[02:02.920 --> 02:08.040]  showing feminine traits, including producing eggs, reduced sperm counts, and less aggressive
[02:08.040 --> 02:09.040]  behavior.
[02:09.040 --> 02:12.880]  Professor Tyler stated that, quote, we are showing that some of these chemicals can have
[02:12.880 --> 02:17.600]  much wider health effects in fish than we expected, using specially-created transgenic
[02:17.600 --> 02:21.280]  fish that allows us to see response to these chemicals in the bodies of the fish in real
[02:21.280 --> 02:22.280]  time.
[02:22.280 --> 02:27.080]  For example, we have shown that estrogens found in some plastics affect the valves in
[02:27.080 --> 02:28.280]  the heart.
[02:28.280 --> 02:32.600]  Other research has shown that many other chemicals that are being discharged through sewage treatment
[02:32.600 --> 02:38.160]  works can affect fish, including antidepressant drugs that reduce the natural shyness of
[02:38.160 --> 02:41.880]  some fish species, including the way they react to predators.
[02:41.880 --> 02:44.880]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently given for sponsors.
[02:44.880 --> 02:48.880]  If you have a product or a sewage you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me
[02:48.880 --> 02:51.880]  a call at 210-363-2257.
[02:51.880 --> 03:19.880]  This was Rick Brody with your lowdown for July 3, 2017.
[03:19.880 --> 03:45.880]  Thank you very much for watching this video.
[03:45.880 --> 04:10.880]  Thank you very much for watching.
[04:15.880 --> 04:43.780]  Okay, howdy howdy, this is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, rule of law radio.
[04:43.780 --> 04:58.540]  On this, the 6th day of July, 2017, okay, all the phone lines are open, 512-646-1984,
[04:58.540 --> 05:05.640]  sounds a little distracted, we have a little issues with my setup getting on the air.
[05:05.640 --> 05:09.800]  So I was a little distracted getting it all straightened out.
[05:09.800 --> 05:19.200]  I seem to give Debra special issues trying to get me on the air, so it's not uncommon.
[05:19.200 --> 05:23.560]  If you have any questions or comments, give us a call.
[05:23.560 --> 05:32.720]  I did have some interesting issues this week, I've been after my local authorities, I just
[05:32.720 --> 05:43.240]  had an interesting conversation with my local sheriff's office, I have filed some complaints
[05:43.240 --> 05:50.840]  against some public officials, one was a judge that I went into a hearing and told the judge
[05:50.840 --> 06:00.720]  I was going to record the hearing and he informed me that he would not allow it.
[06:00.720 --> 06:04.720]  So I asked the bailiff to arrest him and the bailiff chickened out and wouldn't arrest
[06:04.720 --> 06:11.880]  him, so I filed criminal charges with the bailiff who happened to be a sheriff's deputy.
[06:11.880 --> 06:17.880]  And this was back in May and I hadn't heard from it so I went to the sheriff's department
[06:17.880 --> 06:26.200]  and pressuring them to seek out their policy.
[06:26.200 --> 06:34.360]  We have a sheriff now who is an ex-Texas ranger and this particular sheriff seems to like
[06:34.360 --> 06:44.400]  to go after political opponents with the tools where he gets them accused of a crime and
[06:44.400 --> 06:49.240]  then goes to the public to get a petition to have them removed from office.
[06:49.240 --> 06:58.560]  He's doing that to a constable right now, but a constable has been accused of misappropriating
[06:58.560 --> 07:06.080]  gasoline that he supposedly bought for his county vehicle and actually used it in his
[07:06.080 --> 07:13.320]  personal vehicle or bought the gas and used it on personal time, something like that.
[07:13.320 --> 07:19.920]  And they're trying to indict him and get him prosecuted and the sheriff now is trying
[07:19.920 --> 07:26.920]  to get him removed by petition, so I filed criminal charges against a judge with one
[07:26.920 --> 07:29.720]  of these deputies.
[07:29.720 --> 07:39.200]  And as his relatively standard procedure, the deputy didn't give it some magistrate.
[07:39.200 --> 07:48.040]  So I talked to this lieutenant who was very good, he handled me very well, and I told
[07:48.040 --> 07:58.160]  him that since the deputy was working for the sheriff and the sheriff was responding
[07:58.160 --> 08:05.680]  at superior, if I don't find that these complaints were presented to some magistrate in accordance
[08:05.680 --> 08:14.800]  with Article 2.13, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, then my alternative, my remedy is to file
[08:14.800 --> 08:20.520]  criminal charges against the sheriff as responded at superior.
[08:20.520 --> 08:24.880]  And then once I file criminal charges against the sheriff for shielding from prosecution,
[08:24.880 --> 08:30.240]  they will need to put together a petition to see if we can't get the sheriff removed
[08:30.240 --> 08:31.240]  from office.
[08:31.240 --> 08:39.240]  The lieutenant just could not find the humor in that somehow.
[08:39.240 --> 08:45.960]  Oh, these policemen, they just seem not to have a good sense of humor when you take their
[08:45.960 --> 08:48.440]  behavior back to them.
[08:48.440 --> 08:53.920]  We do have some calls on that come on pretty early, and I do apologize about last week,
[08:53.920 --> 08:54.920]  last Friday.
[08:54.920 --> 09:01.000]  I had to put in an archive, I was pretty ill, I'm a lot better now.
[09:01.000 --> 09:03.000]  So we'll try not to get any more archives.
[09:03.000 --> 09:06.280]  We're going to start with Dave from Texas.
[09:06.280 --> 09:10.520]  Hello Dave, what do you have for us today?
[09:10.520 --> 09:21.920]  Yeah, Randy, my bank every couple of years, I just have a credit card attached to my checking
[09:21.920 --> 09:30.480]  account, and every couple of years, the money's always there.
[09:30.480 --> 09:40.400]  It's an automatic payment to the credit card, and they penalize me over computer errors,
[09:40.400 --> 09:54.360]  and I let it go, but after 15 years, I've had the card 15, they shut the card down.
[09:54.360 --> 10:10.360]  And besides this, my bank and all banks do not have a system or protocol or anything to
[10:10.360 --> 10:22.880]  do with disabled elderly men in a wheelchair, and I'm thinking of suing them for penalizing
[10:22.880 --> 10:35.720]  me for their computer errors, and number two, just not having any accommodation for under
[10:35.720 --> 10:46.360]  the Americans with Disabilities Act, does that apply to credit cards?
[10:46.360 --> 10:58.560]  Good question, Randy, Randy, sometimes when I'm calling in just to get my balance, I lose
[10:58.560 --> 11:04.560]  my train of thought, and then I'm interrogated, and they hang up on me.
[11:04.560 --> 11:24.640]  They don't have, I mean, other institutions don't have ways for business to do right by
[11:24.640 --> 11:31.120]  disabled people, and anyway, the bottom line is...
[11:31.120 --> 11:40.240]  Okay, wait, this doesn't sound like something that's amenable to courts, it sounds like
[11:40.240 --> 11:49.840]  something that's amenable to something much more powerful, and that's corporate politics.
[11:49.840 --> 12:00.600]  You know, you're just an old cripple with a credit card, but you're also a civilian
[12:00.600 --> 12:10.400]  as the corporation is concerned, so you're not limited by their protocols.
[12:10.400 --> 12:20.800]  Who is the president or chairman of the board of the company that owns the credit card company?
[12:20.800 --> 12:27.960]  Well, I'll tell you a little story about where I'm going.
[12:27.960 --> 12:33.520]  Years ago, a friend of mine moved in near me, and where we were at, they still had party
[12:33.520 --> 12:38.880]  lines, and we were kind of out in the country, and he needed a private line because he had
[12:38.880 --> 12:45.880]  a business where he had to pay $200 extra, and this was 25, 30 years ago, so it's a lot
[12:45.880 --> 12:51.200]  more than it is now, and he had to put in 200 feet of underground cable before they'd
[12:51.200 --> 12:52.200]  hooked it up.
[12:52.200 --> 12:53.700]  Well, he did all that.
[12:53.700 --> 12:58.000]  They hooked it up, and they put him on a six-party line.
[12:58.000 --> 13:05.480]  Well, he was not a happy camper, and I happened to know that Sintel, they claimed their office
[13:05.480 --> 13:15.600]  was in Waco, or Colleen, but in fact, it was actually the corporate office was in Chicago,
[13:15.600 --> 13:21.480]  so I called the corporate office in Chicago, and acted like I was upset and demanded it.
[13:21.480 --> 13:27.920]  But first, I called and asked for the name of the president, told him my daughter was
[13:27.920 --> 13:36.120]  doing a report in high school on high-level corporate executives, and wanted to do a story
[13:36.120 --> 13:39.760]  about the president of Sintel, so they gave me the president's name.
[13:39.760 --> 13:42.800]  Okay, I fibbed a little bit.
[13:42.800 --> 13:50.880]  I hung up, I called back, and I asked for the president by name, so they bring up his
[13:50.880 --> 13:59.520]  office, and I get his assistant, and I sat on real gruff with her, I demand to speak
[13:59.520 --> 14:02.840]  to him by name, and she said, well, he's not here.
[14:02.840 --> 14:04.360]  I said, well, who is there?
[14:04.360 --> 14:06.360]  She said, well, Mr. Rice is here.
[14:06.360 --> 14:07.360]  Well, who is he?
[14:07.360 --> 14:13.400]  Well, he's the chairman of the board, and I said, he will do.
[14:13.400 --> 14:17.520]  So I handed the phone to Mark, and I said, this guy's name's Rice, he's in Chicago,
[14:17.520 --> 14:18.520]  he can help.
[14:18.520 --> 14:21.920]  And Mark is pretty furious for this time.
[14:21.920 --> 14:29.880]  He grabbed the phone out of my hand and said, hello, Rice, look you, I paid you for a private
[14:29.880 --> 14:33.240]  line and you've put me on a six-party line.
[14:33.240 --> 14:37.960]  I'm going to have my private line, I have to come up to Chicago and kick your behind
[14:37.960 --> 14:38.960]  to get it.
[14:38.960 --> 14:41.960]  And he bailed me, hung up.
[14:41.960 --> 14:44.800]  I said, holy mackerel, Mark.
[14:44.800 --> 14:45.800]  You mean that was?
[14:45.800 --> 14:48.800]  I don't know, some Rice SOB.
[14:48.800 --> 14:52.400]  That was the chairman of the board.
[14:52.400 --> 14:59.920]  The next morning, I go over to his house, I bet there were 200 guys out there.
[14:59.920 --> 15:08.600]  They were up poles, back holes, ditch witches, big mess.
[15:08.600 --> 15:13.120]  Turned out that corporate had been trying to get these guys to upgrade these lines for
[15:13.120 --> 15:19.080]  a while because they bought this little telephone co-op and it's the only one with party lines
[15:19.080 --> 15:25.920]  and they couldn't get the company they bought to do what they were telling them to.
[15:25.920 --> 15:34.080]  Point is, you go straight to the top and raise your issue and do a little creative phone
[15:34.080 --> 15:40.000]  calling to find out who the president or chairman of the board is.
[15:40.000 --> 15:48.320]  And the one who's really the most politically powerful is not the president or the chairman
[15:48.320 --> 15:50.320]  of the board.
[15:50.320 --> 15:54.800]  It's their assistant or their secretary.
[15:54.800 --> 16:06.800]  The president and the chairman, they have to exercise political discretion, if the secretary
[16:06.800 --> 16:07.800]  doesn't.
[16:07.800 --> 16:13.520]  The secretaries are the one that gets lots of stuff done.
[16:13.520 --> 16:18.640]  If you crawl down the secretary's throat, she'll be calling down, calling down everybody's
[16:18.640 --> 16:25.360]  throat and they will not be able to fix your problem fast enough.
[16:25.360 --> 16:29.920]  Does that sound interesting, Dave?
[16:29.920 --> 16:30.920]  It does.
[16:30.920 --> 16:37.920]  It does, I've worked in a corporate world and I can imagine that being very helpful,
[16:37.920 --> 16:41.040]  very, very helpful, yeah.
[16:41.040 --> 16:44.760]  And us being just ordinary people, we can do that.
[16:44.760 --> 16:52.600]  I did that to Southwestern Bell when I was trying to put an advertisement in their Yellow
[16:52.600 --> 16:58.760]  Pages and I had a phone with hands free on it so they put me on hold and I just hit the
[16:58.760 --> 16:59.760]  hands free.
[16:59.760 --> 17:01.240]  Thank Cookie!
[17:01.240 --> 17:02.240]  Cookie?
[17:02.240 --> 17:03.320]  We love cookies!
[17:03.320 --> 17:04.800]  Oh, hi Cookie Munchers!
[17:04.800 --> 17:07.520]  No, these are Yucky Cookies.
[17:07.520 --> 17:08.520]  Cookie?
[17:08.520 --> 17:09.520]  Yucky?
[17:09.520 --> 17:10.520]  No, no bad cookies!
[17:10.520 --> 17:12.240]  You can't even eat these cookies, these are cyber cookies!
[17:12.240 --> 17:13.240]  No cookies?
[17:13.240 --> 17:17.020]  No, they're cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:17.020 --> 17:18.020]  These have apples.
[17:18.020 --> 17:19.020]  Really?
[17:19.020 --> 17:21.280]  Oh, that's an apple apple.
[17:21.280 --> 17:22.280]  Yummy apple.
[17:22.280 --> 17:26.880]  I'm going to throw away these Yucky Cookies in the trash.
[17:26.880 --> 17:33.000]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.000 --> 17:34.600]  Bye bye Yucca Cookies.
[17:34.600 --> 17:40.840]  Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side,
[17:40.840 --> 17:46.320]  bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:46.320 --> 17:47.320]  new cookies.
[17:47.320 --> 17:48.320]  New cookies?
[17:48.320 --> 17:49.320]  For me?
[17:49.320 --> 17:51.120]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.120 --> 17:55.920]  And every time I order on Amazon I go through this link and I give a little present to this
[17:55.920 --> 17:56.920]  radio network too.
[17:56.920 --> 17:57.920]  See you for cookies.
[17:57.920 --> 17:58.920]  See you for cookies.
[17:58.920 --> 17:59.920]  Bye bye.
[17:59.920 --> 18:08.920]  It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks.
[18:08.920 --> 18:10.920]  Defense distributed in Fatsal, Delhi.
[18:10.920 --> 18:13.920]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[18:13.920 --> 18:16.920]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:16.920 --> 18:21.920]  From Central Texas Gunworks, first place up for grabs of Spike's Tactical AR-15.
[18:21.920 --> 18:25.920]  Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm Pistol.
[18:25.920 --> 18:30.920]  From Defense Distributed, third place, the AR-308 80% lower.
[18:30.920 --> 18:33.920]  Fourth place, the AR-15 80% lower.
[18:33.920 --> 18:37.920]  From Fatsal, Delhi, fifth place, $100 gift card for Fatsal, Delhi.
[18:37.920 --> 18:40.920]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:40.920 --> 18:42.920]  That's logosradionetwork.com.
[18:42.920 --> 18:47.920]  Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[18:47.920 --> 18:50.920]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar, get 10 chances to win.
[18:50.920 --> 18:53.920]  Remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:53.920 --> 19:22.920]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[19:22.920 --> 19:29.920]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[19:53.920 --> 19:57.920]  I forgot who I called had been so long.
[19:57.920 --> 20:05.920]  When I realized who it was, I almost couldn't believe that the telephone company couldn't answer their own phone.
[20:05.920 --> 20:14.920]  So I hung up on them and called back and got one of the executive vice presidents and just crawled down his throat.
[20:14.920 --> 20:20.920]  Within 10 minutes, I had everybody calling me trying to handle my issue.
[20:20.920 --> 20:26.920]  Dave, it is good for companies for you to do that.
[20:26.920 --> 20:29.920]  I own my own company for years.
[20:29.920 --> 20:36.920]  When my employees screwed up, I was the last one to find out.
[20:36.920 --> 20:42.920]  These people who run these businesses, who have their money in these businesses,
[20:42.920 --> 20:53.920]  they never get good information on what's going on unless their customers come to them and tell them.
[20:53.920 --> 21:04.920]  Good chance you go to the top of this company and it all case that this will trickle down very quickly.
[21:04.920 --> 21:09.920]  Oh, you can probably hear you better if I unmute you.
[21:09.920 --> 21:12.920]  Oh, okay.
[21:12.920 --> 21:15.920]  Oh yeah, that's much better.
[21:15.920 --> 21:26.920]  Randy, I'm trying to develop my own style based on what you've said as far as the politics.
[21:26.920 --> 21:32.920]  As you know, I settled with my landlord over the floorboards issue.
[21:32.920 --> 21:39.920]  I think I'm developing a style.
[21:39.920 --> 21:45.920]  What I did with these people is I sued them in JP, I sued them in county,
[21:45.920 --> 21:51.920]  and I sued them in the district court all about the same time.
[21:51.920 --> 21:58.920]  Different people in this company, different charges.
[21:58.920 --> 22:06.920]  And ultimately, I was actually going to get a permission from City Hall to demonstrate
[22:06.920 --> 22:11.920]  and hire homeless people to hold signs up saying what these people were doing to me.
[22:11.920 --> 22:20.920]  It was kind of my own, and that's the style I want to pursue because my case is going to...
[22:20.920 --> 22:21.920]  Okay, hold on.
[22:21.920 --> 22:22.920]  Hold on.
[22:22.920 --> 22:24.920]  Let me make a comment.
[22:24.920 --> 22:32.920]  You are the first person since I've been doing this show to make that comment,
[22:32.920 --> 22:43.920]  and that is so very astute that I do what I do, but I do what I do because it is my style.
[22:43.920 --> 22:49.920]  And I would hope that everybody out there who listens to what we present
[22:49.920 --> 22:56.920]  understand that I do what I do because it's who I am, and that may not be your style,
[22:56.920 --> 23:00.920]  and everybody should look to develop their own style.
[23:00.920 --> 23:03.920]  I do appreciate that comment, Dave.
[23:03.920 --> 23:05.920]  Go ahead.
[23:05.920 --> 23:19.920]  Yeah, yeah, the cases, the people who have kind of aggravated me in the past couple of years,
[23:19.920 --> 23:23.920]  it's not going to be a amount too much money.
[23:23.920 --> 23:31.920]  And I'm listening to your shows literally every week.
[23:31.920 --> 23:35.920]  I'm set upon this style.
[23:35.920 --> 23:40.920]  It's only worked once, but it worked very, very well.
[23:40.920 --> 23:43.920]  I went after the owner and district court.
[23:43.920 --> 23:55.920]  I went after the manager in the county court, and then went after the property manager in J.P. Court.
[23:55.920 --> 24:05.920]  And they settled, and I was preparing to go to City Hall for a protest, a permit to protest.
[24:05.920 --> 24:17.920]  And that's all I really have that I'm going to continue to do is 1, 2, 3, 4, sue them on all courts
[24:17.920 --> 24:32.920]  and just see because what I saw in their lawyer is that he didn't seem to have the time to go into all these courts
[24:32.920 --> 24:39.920]  and fly back and forth to take care of me.
[24:39.920 --> 24:45.920]  And they weren't going to get any money out of me because I'm on disability.
[24:45.920 --> 24:55.920]  And that's all I have to say, Randy, is that I'm going to go with this style.
[24:55.920 --> 25:02.920]  It's the thing of trying to get people to understand.
[25:02.920 --> 25:13.920]  They had to marshal up a defense to three different lawsuits over one relatively minor issue.
[25:13.920 --> 25:23.920]  And almost certainly, all the way up through the corporate structure, everybody knows about this.
[25:23.920 --> 25:28.920]  Probably everybody in the company knows who you are.
[25:28.920 --> 25:37.920]  And almost certainly, they've changed their policies to keep this kind of thing from happening again.
[25:37.920 --> 25:41.920]  Yes, completely.
[25:41.920 --> 25:46.920]  This is powerful.
[25:46.920 --> 25:49.920]  I think so.
[25:49.920 --> 25:52.920]  Don't start trying to be nice with these guys.
[25:52.920 --> 25:56.920]  They don't understand nice.
[25:56.920 --> 25:59.920]  They understand what Scott teaches them.
[25:59.920 --> 26:04.920]  I'll bar grieve you into the Stone Age.
[26:04.920 --> 26:09.920]  Right, right, Randy.
[26:09.920 --> 26:13.920]  Okay, Randy, great talking to you.
[26:13.920 --> 26:17.920]  We'll keep on good work going on.
[26:17.920 --> 26:19.920]  You have a good night.
[26:19.920 --> 26:21.920]  Okay, thank you, Dave.
[26:21.920 --> 26:26.920]  Now we're going to go to Boris in Texas. Hello, Boris.
[26:26.920 --> 26:29.920]  Hey, Randy. How you doing?
[26:29.920 --> 26:31.920]  I'm doing good.
[26:31.920 --> 26:42.920]  Okay, where do you want to start? This is the case of the ex-husband, ex-wife, and trying to resolve a debt.
[26:42.920 --> 26:47.920]  How much of the back story do you want to give?
[26:47.920 --> 26:55.920]  Well, I think most people know you bought a house from a couple who were getting divorced who subsequently got divorced.
[26:55.920 --> 27:04.920]  The husband didn't give the money to the wife. The wife thought the lawyers sick the clients on each other.
[27:04.920 --> 27:11.920]  And then they went after your property that you had bought from them because the wife had a claim against the husband.
[27:11.920 --> 27:17.920]  So they put a lien on your property and stopped you from being able to make a sale.
[27:17.920 --> 27:20.920]  So where are we at now?
[27:20.920 --> 27:28.920]  Well, they dropped that lawsuit. That's what had recently happened, I think, the last time I talked to you.
[27:28.920 --> 27:31.920]  And that was two weeks ago because I couldn't get through last week.
[27:31.920 --> 27:36.920]  But anyway, so they dropped that.
[27:36.920 --> 27:40.920]  And so we were all happy about that.
[27:40.920 --> 27:48.920]  And then I started talking to the ex-husband and I said, okay, well, let's get this wrapped up so I can get this sale of it wrapped up.
[27:48.920 --> 27:58.920]  And he was kind of worried about being sued again by her without me in the picture, you know, a little bit later on or whatever.
[27:58.920 --> 28:05.920]  And I was like, well, you know, I've got to go on, you know, I can't guarantee that you won't be sued or whatever.
[28:05.920 --> 28:08.920]  So he said, okay, well, let's go talk to my attorney.
[28:08.920 --> 28:12.920]  You know, so he set an appointment with his attorney and we went and talked to him.
[28:12.920 --> 28:26.920]  And while we were sitting there, you know, I had made out a check for the remainder balance, which is not very much, you know, and I said, okay, well, what if I give him the check?
[28:26.920 --> 28:29.920]  I mean, he, you know, doesn't that do it?
[28:29.920 --> 28:39.920]  And his attorney was like, you know, recommending that he not take it, that he signed a paperwork over to his XY for whatever.
[28:39.920 --> 28:53.920]  And so anyway, afterwards, you know, we talked about that and the people who are buying my house, they talked to me and they said, well, you know, you are never responsible for being any kind of a liaison to the XY for any of that stuff.
[28:53.920 --> 28:58.920]  You're just supposed to go to the lender or anything about the lender's problems is the lender's problems.
[28:58.920 --> 29:14.920]  And I thought about that and I thought, yeah, why was I ever looking for the XY from trying to appeal to her or get her signature one that really, in most respects, or maybe all respects wasn't my job to be doing in the first place, you know.
[29:14.920 --> 29:21.920]  And so then I went ahead and wrote him a demand letter with another check.
[29:21.920 --> 29:38.920]  And I listed, you know, here's this and that, you know, and I even hinted toward the fact that he had asked me at one time to pay him under the pay bowl, you know, and I sent it to his attorney so his attorney would get it first.
[29:38.920 --> 29:40.920]  So his attorney would talk some sense into him.
[29:40.920 --> 29:48.920]  And sure enough, I mean, I said that yesterday afternoon at five o'clock and he called by one o'clock this afternoon today.
[29:48.920 --> 29:51.920]  And anyway, I hear the music.
[29:51.920 --> 29:52.920]  Okay, okay.
[29:52.920 --> 29:53.920]  Hang on, yeah.
[29:53.920 --> 30:00.920]  Randy Helton, Debra Stevens, we'll be right back.
[30:00.920 --> 30:03.920]  Is it stealing to download music from the Internet?
[30:03.920 --> 30:07.920]  You might be surprised at the way college students answer that question.
[30:07.920 --> 30:14.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with results of a new study that explores current attitudes about digital piracy.
[30:14.920 --> 30:16.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.920 --> 30:20.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.920 --> 30:24.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.920 --> 30:26.920]  So protect your rights.
[30:26.920 --> 30:30.920]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.920 --> 30:32.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.920 --> 30:40.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.920 --> 30:43.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.920 --> 30:47.920]  You've probably seen public service messages about digital piracy.
[30:47.920 --> 30:52.920]  One of the most famous ads likens illegally downloading digital content to stealing a car.
[30:52.920 --> 30:55.920]  But apparently those education efforts aren't working.
[30:55.920 --> 31:01.920]  A new study by the University of Nebraska found that students believe shoplifting a CD from a music store is wrong.
[31:01.920 --> 31:06.920]  But those same students view illegal digital downloads as far less serious.
[31:06.920 --> 31:12.920]  Researchers believe digital piracy is more acceptable because there's no physical danger and no visible victim.
[31:12.920 --> 31:17.920]  And since the practice is widespread on college campuses, there's a lot of social support.
[31:17.920 --> 31:22.920]  But as an author who's had my own work pirated, I can say it's pretty unpleasant from this end.
[31:22.920 --> 31:43.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.920 --> 32:00.920]  1-0-4-3-6-7 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you only at NQSA.org.
[32:22.920 --> 32:41.920]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.920 --> 32:46.000]  copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio
[32:46.000 --> 32:50.160]  of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[32:50.160 --> 32:54.680]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.680 --> 33:21.440]  Yes, Mr. Office, I was thinking to lie to you. I want you to follow the law of the
[33:21.440 --> 33:36.360]  law. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. We're talking to boys in Texas.
[33:36.360 --> 33:44.760]  And you're trying to give them a check to get this deal completed. Yeah, yeah. And I sent
[33:44.760 --> 33:50.920]  in a check saying here, you know, tracking down the X Ys and then negotiating with her
[33:50.920 --> 33:58.680]  was never my responsibility. I'm paying it off now, 30 days from now. You know, after
[33:58.680 --> 34:08.040]  30 days, there is a $250 liquidation damages kind of a fee that that applies if someone
[34:08.040 --> 34:16.080]  is not willing to accept payment and turn over a deed. And I included all that stuff
[34:16.080 --> 34:27.880]  in a couple of things that he had done. Did you include the UCC requirement or position
[34:27.880 --> 34:36.120]  that payment offered, payment tendered and not accepted as payment made? Yeah, I remember
[34:36.120 --> 34:43.320]  you mentioning that and at the time you don't remember exactly where that was. Although they
[34:43.320 --> 34:48.120]  called back. It looks like I said the right thing, but I remember you talking about the
[34:48.120 --> 34:58.920]  UCC. Do you remember what that is now? Like what? I don't, but it will be easy enough
[34:58.920 --> 35:04.920]  to find out if you used to a search for payment offered and not accepted as payment made.
[35:04.920 --> 35:10.920]  You should get a hit right on it. Yeah, and I know how to do that better than I did four
[35:10.920 --> 35:16.880]  or five months ago when you mentioned that. I've had a lot more experience in the past
[35:16.880 --> 35:25.560]  two months, three months. But anyway, he called right back though. I really put a lot of time
[35:25.560 --> 35:32.120]  into saying exactly the right thing I think I did because I mailed that just a regular
[35:32.120 --> 35:37.760]  certified letter to the attorney, which is just a few blocks from the post office right
[35:37.760 --> 35:45.000]  here in downtown Denton anyway. And this, anyway, XSFN called me back by one o'clock
[35:45.000 --> 35:52.680]  today and he said, I got this letter from that you sent in to my attorney and we talked
[35:52.680 --> 36:00.040]  it over and he said it's probably better just to go and give me a special warranty deed.
[36:00.040 --> 36:08.480]  So I wanted to ask about my buyers that would like to have the strongest possible deed. Now
[36:08.480 --> 36:14.120]  the special warranty deed, that's not too bad, is it considered that you might have
[36:14.120 --> 36:20.160]  the XSFN still lingering in the background? What do you think of the special warranty
[36:20.160 --> 36:25.080]  deed? Well, it depends on the nature of the special
[36:25.080 --> 36:36.640]  warranty deed, what the special applies to. A warranty deed is generally, okay, go back
[36:36.640 --> 36:46.400]  to Texas property code 13.001. Any claim against real property not properly acknowledged
[36:46.400 --> 36:56.280]  or proven and filed in the record is voidish to the holder. Is there a claim beyond the
[36:56.280 --> 37:01.280]  warranty deed to the property? Was there any claim there?
[37:01.280 --> 37:05.840]  Yeah, is there any claim filed in the county recorder's office?
[37:05.840 --> 37:11.040]  I don't think so other than, now I don't know if they've taken off that list of pendants
[37:11.040 --> 37:20.280]  yet, but the lawsuit dropped anyway. If the attempt to come back with a claim,
[37:20.280 --> 37:26.320]  if it's not filed in the public record against that property, they don't have it. If you
[37:26.320 --> 37:35.840]  have a warranty deed filed in the record and there is no claim subsequently filed against
[37:35.840 --> 37:42.040]  the property subsequent to your warranty deed, and they're the ones that granted the warranty
[37:42.040 --> 37:51.960]  deed, then there can be no claim. So if they come after you, then if they file anything,
[37:51.960 --> 37:59.920]  I would suggest you immediately countersue. That'll break them from sucking eggs.
[37:59.920 --> 38:08.400]  Well, it wouldn't be... He's going to do it just without even... Because he asked me
[38:08.400 --> 38:13.480]  if I'd contacted his ex-wife recently. I said no. So I mean, he's going to do it without
[38:13.480 --> 38:19.680]  her cooperation or signature or anything. So because...
[38:19.680 --> 38:29.080]  But if the deal was made while he and the wife were together and she didn't object
[38:29.080 --> 38:38.240]  to it, and you're completing a deal that was already in progress, she has no claim. If
[38:38.240 --> 38:43.600]  they attempt to exert a claim, then you can turn it right back on them.
[38:43.600 --> 38:53.800]  Yeah. Right. Well, it was only... He and his partner's business, they bought it through
[38:53.800 --> 38:59.880]  their business and split it right to me within five days at the time anyway. So it wasn't
[38:59.880 --> 39:09.800]  like it ever had he and his wife's name in the contract at all. In the contract, it shows
[39:09.800 --> 39:14.400]  their business name even and no mention of an ex-wife.
[39:14.400 --> 39:24.360]  So yeah. Her lawyer should have known she didn't have standing to start with.
[39:24.360 --> 39:32.760]  Yeah. Right. Well, okay. So then if they were to do anything to counter-sube on that, because
[39:32.760 --> 39:37.440]  I don't think there's any... I haven't done the telephone search recently or anything,
[39:37.440 --> 39:43.480]  but I don't think there's any other claim on it or any other obstacle.
[39:43.480 --> 39:53.120]  At the end of the day, anybody can sue you for anything that they want to. So to try
[39:53.120 --> 39:58.000]  to make a promise to the buyer that they won't be sued, well, they can sue you because you
[39:58.000 --> 40:05.280]  parted your hair on the wrong side. Yeah. That don't mean you're going to get anywhere,
[40:05.280 --> 40:10.440]  and you certainly have remedy for a frivolous action.
[40:10.440 --> 40:15.640]  Yeah. And that would be for years. That would definitely be frivolous because y'all to go
[40:15.640 --> 40:21.440]  after him with anything, but not try to, you know, file him.
[40:21.440 --> 40:31.080]  At the end of the day, real property in Texas, a claim against real property has to be filed
[40:31.080 --> 40:40.400]  in the public record. If you have an unencumbered warranty deed and there are no claims against
[40:40.400 --> 40:47.400]  it, no one can bring a claim. Unless someone goes on the property and gets injured, then
[40:47.400 --> 40:56.520]  they can sue against the property and try to get a claim. But if it's frivolous, then
[40:56.520 --> 41:01.920]  you can certainly countersue, but there is no guarantee that you won't be sued.
[41:01.920 --> 41:11.680]  Well, sure, there's never. And what you're saying is fine for a special warranty deed
[41:11.680 --> 41:15.600]  as well, right? I'm not sure what special means in that warranty
[41:15.600 --> 41:19.640]  deed. Well, the way I understand a special warranty
[41:19.640 --> 41:26.840]  deed is being a little, being a bit more timeframe-sensitive. Whereas, like with a special warranty
[41:26.840 --> 41:37.360]  deed, it's not as secure as a general warranty deed, but it's far stronger than something
[41:37.360 --> 41:46.760]  like a quick claim. Okay. In my research and work, I haven't found
[41:46.760 --> 41:56.120]  anything in particular on special warranted deeds. Generally, if there is a special warranty
[41:56.120 --> 42:01.360]  deed, there will be some kind of condition written into it. And the condition would
[42:01.360 --> 42:06.240]  be self-explanatory. Okay. Is there a condition in this special
[42:06.240 --> 42:11.160]  warranty deed? Well, nothing's written up. Nothing's written
[42:11.160 --> 42:17.200]  up. Yeah, he just called to the institute. He probably just did a special warranty deed.
[42:17.200 --> 42:26.080]  Look for a condition hidden in the fine print. Mm-hmm. Yeah. That's the only thing that could
[42:26.080 --> 42:32.840]  make it special. Okay. Okay. Well, it would pertain to her.
[42:32.840 --> 42:39.200]  If there's not anyone else to cause an issue there. And even...
[42:39.200 --> 42:47.640]  You might want them to agree to indemnify you against any claim by her.
[42:47.640 --> 42:53.760]  Oh, yeah. You mean, I get... When you say them, you mean who?
[42:53.760 --> 43:00.400]  Yeah, that is she... You buy this property, you pay it off on the condition that if you
[43:00.400 --> 43:07.680]  are sued by his wife, they will indemnify you and pay your costs for that suit.
[43:07.680 --> 43:19.000]  Oh, if they were to sue me. Well... Yes. Okay. Or a subsequent purchaser.
[43:19.000 --> 43:31.240]  Yeah. Well, that's what now... Yeah, because I do have a buyer here and what we were going
[43:31.240 --> 43:38.520]  to do is me, you know, turn right around and give them a deed. I was going to ask you if
[43:38.520 --> 43:43.120]  I could go up to a special warranty deed up to giving them a general warranty deed.
[43:43.120 --> 43:45.320]  Okay. Well, I just haven't heard a couple of that.
[43:45.320 --> 43:52.320]  Okay. Okay. Hang on. Hang on. That's a good break. But you would want to hold this clause.
[43:52.320 --> 43:59.320]  Hang on. Ready to count and get receiving. We will radio. I'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[43:59.320 --> 44:07.920]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come
[44:07.920 --> 44:13.400]  by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books
[44:13.400 --> 44:17.600]  and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:17.600 --> 44:22.680]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.680 --> 44:26.760]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu Oil,
[44:26.760 --> 44:34.840]  ocean candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[44:34.840 --> 44:43.280]  us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[44:43.280 --> 45:01.360]  forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.360 --> 45:07.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.760 --> 45:14.760]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.760 --> 45:21.080]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[45:21.080 --> 45:26.440]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and
[45:26.440 --> 45:33.240]  now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[45:33.240 --> 45:39.160]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.160 --> 45:44.640]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[45:44.640 --> 45:51.680]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[45:51.680 --> 46:04.120]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:04.120 --> 46:22.160]  If you need not have any problem, where you gonna look for one? If you could not wait any
[46:22.160 --> 46:37.480]  better to know what your purpose has to be done.
[46:37.480 --> 46:56.800]  If you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what your purpose has to be done.
[46:56.800 --> 47:15.880]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Boris
[47:15.880 --> 47:24.720]  in Texas. Yes, I would want a whole harmless clause in the Special Warranty deal for any
[47:24.720 --> 47:36.560]  claims against the property that arose from the XY for related to the divorce. Does that
[47:36.560 --> 47:42.560]  sound reasonable, Boris? Yeah, yeah. Right, just if they write something
[47:42.560 --> 47:50.040]  in there that says anything from what, mention anything from the divorce, you know, I'm not
[47:50.040 --> 47:57.760]  responsible for it basically. Yeah, that would make it a special warranty
[47:57.760 --> 48:01.760]  deed. Okay, right, the provision makes it the special
[48:01.760 --> 48:13.080]  rather than general. Okay, now when I turn around and then sell it to my buyer, could
[48:13.080 --> 48:20.600]  I just give them a general warranty deed? Yeah, you could give them, the wife would
[48:20.600 --> 48:26.760]  have no claim against the buyer at all. She might think she has a claim against you, but
[48:26.760 --> 48:32.800]  if you have a whole harmless clause, then she can sue if she wants to, but she has to
[48:32.800 --> 48:38.960]  sue the husband. Yeah, okay, so that clause would be for me,
[48:38.960 --> 48:45.440]  but then I can turn around and give my buyer a general warranty deed, and even though I
[48:45.440 --> 48:50.960]  just, you know, it'd be a couple of days, but I can give them a general warranty deed.
[48:50.960 --> 48:55.440]  Yeah, okay, yeah, that's what I'll do then. You should be good.
[48:55.440 --> 49:02.440]  Yeah, okay. Right, okay, well, then I'll try that, you
[49:02.440 --> 49:09.560]  know, okay. Okay, good luck for us. Yeah, last time I pitched in some chains in
[49:09.560 --> 49:14.240]  here in Randy's beer fund, you know, I don't have much money at all, but I wanted to chunk
[49:14.240 --> 49:22.120]  it from there, so I can encourage others. Yeah, Randy's beer fund is a horrible mess.
[49:22.120 --> 49:28.480]  I'm getting old and I'm down to half a beer, half a beer puts me to sleep.
[49:28.480 --> 49:39.040]  But it's okay because Randy's beer fund always jumps into my radio anyway. Randy's beer
[49:39.040 --> 49:45.800]  fund is more for fun than anything else. All right, well, I appreciate your help again,
[49:45.800 --> 49:51.560]  as always, and I owe you a little bit more once I get everything all ramped up.
[49:51.560 --> 49:59.920]  Okay, thank you, Boris. Thanks for that. Okay, now we're going to go to Scott in Texas.
[49:59.920 --> 50:08.080]  Hello, Scott. Howdy, howdy. Did you get that printer working?
[50:08.080 --> 50:14.120]  I got the ink in there. I still can't get that dumb thing to recognize my computer.
[50:14.120 --> 50:23.640]  Well, like I told you, go out into the street, flag down the first 10-year-olds you see
[50:23.640 --> 50:28.720]  and have him explain to you, this is the 21st century.
[50:28.720 --> 50:36.560]  Well, dang it, I just don't have anybody around here that's smart enough to do it. They're
[50:36.560 --> 50:42.280]  all playing video games. Yeah, we just bought a big printer. We're
[50:42.280 --> 50:56.040]  going to start cranking up this ticket issue. So have you had anything occur in your litigation?
[50:56.040 --> 51:03.400]  I've got to go to court next Tuesday and the bonds lady she called me yesterday while I
[51:03.400 --> 51:08.720]  was hanging out at my mechanic's shop and she goes, I just want to remind you, you never
[51:08.720 --> 51:14.200]  call this office. I was like, yeah, I'm kind of busy. And she goes, I know, you never call.
[51:14.200 --> 51:19.280]  I'm just giving you a courtesy call. I said, okay, I said, I thought you said you was going
[51:19.280 --> 51:23.840]  to be there last time. Oh, I was. You just didn't see me. I said, well, I was a nurse.
[51:23.840 --> 51:28.080]  I was the best dressed one in there one. I said, yeah, you are. You look real professional.
[51:28.080 --> 51:35.560]  I said, wait till this week. I went a lot of up.
[51:35.560 --> 51:42.560]  It makes a difference when you wear a suit and tie. They just changed their perspective
[51:42.560 --> 51:50.160]  about you to take you more serious. Now, that might not be right, but that's how it works.
[51:50.160 --> 51:57.600]  If I don't wear a suit and tie, I almost always wind up going to jail.
[51:57.600 --> 52:03.480]  Yeah, I was taught. I would talk real quiet and I was the I'm here in special appearance
[52:03.480 --> 52:08.600]  and blah, blah, blah. And even the judge, he looked up. He had just, he took notice of
[52:08.600 --> 52:13.120]  it and then he put his head back down and I said, yeah, here's a copy for you. Here's
[52:13.120 --> 52:17.920]  a copy for the judge. I have a motion to dismiss. Here's a copy for you. Here's a copy for
[52:17.920 --> 52:22.800]  the judge. Oh, we got it. We got reset all this. We can't go any further. We just have
[52:22.800 --> 52:28.120]  to stop here right now. I was like, that's fine. We'll just reset. I'll come back and
[52:28.120 --> 52:35.800]  we'll do this all over again. Have a nice day. So it's going to be really interesting
[52:35.800 --> 52:43.400]  to see how their attitude is after I've been guided to the county judge with the brand
[52:43.400 --> 52:52.320]  jury. I key close the sheriff about five times. He'd be lucky to still have a job and going
[52:52.320 --> 53:00.160]  after the mayor and the local sheriff, I mean, the local chief of police for Little O East
[53:00.160 --> 53:08.040]  to walk in me. They ought to be rolling up the sidewalks by now. But anyway, I got a
[53:08.040 --> 53:19.600]  hypothetical question because these lawsuits on these cops are going absolutely nowhere
[53:19.600 --> 53:30.920]  and they wanted to act like they were going to deny me. Well, they did deny and say that
[53:30.920 --> 53:40.080]  I filed for the poppers thing and they granted it. Well, then they came back on the two that
[53:40.080 --> 53:44.720]  I had against the county judge at Dallas and county judge at Rockwall. They wanted to say
[53:44.720 --> 53:52.160]  that, oh, we renege on your poppers thing and it's not certified. Well, now that I actually
[53:52.160 --> 53:58.000]  have food stamps, I would never take food stamps any time before. It doesn't matter if I was
[53:58.000 --> 54:05.480]  so poor I had to eat dirt. But once I found out that if once you get on food stamps, then
[54:05.480 --> 54:12.280]  you go and apply as a popper, you cannot be denied because you officially are poor according
[54:12.280 --> 54:17.760]  to the government standard. So I'm like, okay, I'll use the government standards and beat
[54:17.760 --> 54:27.000]  them over the head with this. So my question is for the judges that denied my poppers and
[54:27.000 --> 54:33.560]  then wanted to decertify it, can I go after those guys now and say, hey, I told y'all
[54:33.560 --> 54:41.640]  I was poor, y'all were denied me due process of hearing my cases. Then you wanted to decertify
[54:41.640 --> 54:48.440]  everything and say that I wasn't poor enough for you. But now I got a food stamp card says,
[54:48.440 --> 54:54.880]  yeah, I'm actually a dirt poor white boy. So is there any way to go after those guys
[54:54.880 --> 55:04.240]  for doing something like that? Or is it like a told Boris, you can sue anybody for anything.
[55:04.240 --> 55:16.680]  And here you have judges that are violating law. And most of this is about politics more
[55:16.680 --> 55:25.840]  than it is about law. If you can craft a story that would give a reasonable person of ordinary
[55:25.840 --> 55:34.840]  prudence caused to believe that the judge was deliberately spewing his discretion in order
[55:34.840 --> 55:42.760]  to deny you in your white to sink remedy, because you were seeking remedy against public officials
[55:42.760 --> 55:53.880]  like himself, then that's healing from prosecution 38 on five pin code. And that's an abusive
[55:53.880 --> 56:02.480]  discretion. So all you have to do is make up a story that looks like it might convince
[56:02.480 --> 56:13.080]  a grand jury. And then you get everybody hopping up and down. Don't expect to get anybody
[56:13.080 --> 56:18.600]  indicted. It'd be nice if we do. But we certainly can't count on that because these guys are
[56:18.600 --> 56:25.160]  all got their snouts in the same trough. And they're going to try to protect each other.
[56:25.160 --> 56:37.040]  So we make up a story that just looks bad, bad politics. And on the off chance that you
[56:37.040 --> 56:44.480]  will get a grand jury member who feels like they've been in the same place you're at.
[56:44.480 --> 56:51.160]  These officials have to deal with the possibility of being indicted or getting a jury, a pettit
[56:51.160 --> 56:59.080]  jury to rule against them. So yeah, absolutely. You can go after them and we should. The more
[56:59.080 --> 57:06.920]  we go after them, the more we take them to task, the more they'll have reason to follow
[57:06.920 --> 57:18.440]  the way they should. They only do this because 99% of the people let them. And it only takes
[57:18.440 --> 57:25.840]  one or two Scott Richardson's in a county to get everything changed.
[57:25.840 --> 57:36.960]  Oh, I agree. So that was my main thing. I was actually wanting to see if I could take
[57:36.960 --> 57:47.520]  a federal magistrate judge into a small claims court and watch him squirm in front of a small
[57:47.520 --> 57:53.000]  claims court. Now, I know the small claims court judge would probably not want to hear
[57:53.000 --> 57:59.120]  the case and then I'd have to do the round robin on him and get him, you know, file a
[57:59.120 --> 58:05.720]  case against him with a courted law and blah, blah, blah and do all that. But wouldn't it
[58:05.720 --> 58:11.600]  be fun to take a federal magistrate judge to small claims court?
[58:11.600 --> 58:22.760]  It would be wonderful when you have not agreed to a magistrate judge and in the federal system
[58:22.760 --> 58:27.800]  before they can use a magistrate judge, you have to sign an agreement authorizing it.
[58:27.800 --> 58:33.320]  If you don't agree, then he's impersonating a public official. And even if he's doing
[58:33.320 --> 58:38.000]  it in the federal courthouse, that federal courthouse is not a federal enclave. It belongs
[58:38.000 --> 58:43.840]  to the state. So he is in this state. Hang on. Reddick Elton, Deborah Stevens, real
[58:43.840 --> 58:53.040]  of the radio, will be right back. The Bible remains the most popular book in
[58:53.040 --> 58:58.680]  the world. Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some
[58:58.680 --> 59:04.080]  new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.080 --> 59:11.120]  the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation
[59:11.120 --> 59:17.000]  is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory
[59:17.000 --> 59:23.000]  footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.440]  an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.440 --> 59:33.600]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.600 --> 59:39.640]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1
[59:39.640 --> 59:46.640]  888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:09.640 --> 01:00:32.480]  Today in history, the year 1988, the United States Navy worshiped the U.S.S. of Incinus
[01:00:32.480 --> 01:00:37.080]  under the command of William C. Rogers III, shot down and raiding an air passenger flight
[01:00:37.080 --> 01:00:43.080]  655 from Tehran to Dubai over Iran's airspace and territorial waters in the Persian Gulf.
[01:00:43.080 --> 01:00:49.200]  All 290 passengers aboard the Airbus A300 were killed by the detonation of the SM-2MR
[01:00:49.200 --> 01:00:56.080]  surface-to-air missile. Today in history. In recent news, Robert David Steele, listed
[01:00:56.080 --> 01:01:01.560]  on Wikipedia as a former CIA clandestine service case officer, was a guest on InfoWars Alex
[01:01:01.560 --> 01:01:05.800]  Jones Show, where he claimed last Thursday that NASA is not only operating colonies
[01:01:05.800 --> 01:01:10.040]  on Mars, but populating those colonies with kidnapped children slaves. Jones weighed
[01:01:10.040 --> 01:01:15.080]  in on NASA during the program, stating that 90% of NASA's missions are secret, and I've
[01:01:15.080 --> 01:01:19.600]  been told by higher-level NASA engineers, he said, that you have no idea. What seems
[01:01:19.600 --> 01:01:24.120]  even more out of this world is NASA responding to the Alex Jones Show, with NASA spokesperson
[01:01:24.120 --> 01:01:29.320]  Guy Webster telling the Daily Beast the same day that, quote, there are no humans on Mars.
[01:01:29.320 --> 01:01:33.000]  There are active rovers on Mars. There was a rumor going around last week that there
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  weren't, but there are, but there are no humans. It seems InfoWars and Alex Jones are being
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:42.560]  listened to by a lot of important people.
[01:01:42.560 --> 01:01:46.760]  The University of Exeter released a new study by Professor Charles Tyler, which catalogs
[01:01:46.760 --> 01:01:51.080]  how male freshwater fish in Britain are turning into females due to the chemicals released
[01:01:51.080 --> 01:01:56.520]  into the water from birth control pills, cosmetic makeup, cleaning agents and plastics all being
[01:01:56.520 --> 01:02:01.720]  flushed down the drains. The study found that one-fifth of males, or 20% of the male fish
[01:02:01.720 --> 01:02:07.480]  population, were now showing feminine traits, including producing eggs, reduced sperm counts
[01:02:07.480 --> 01:02:09.360]  and less aggressive behavior.
[01:02:09.360 --> 01:02:13.000]  Professor Tyler stated that, quote, we are showing that some of these chemicals can have
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:17.760]  much wider health effects in fish than we expected. Using specially-created transgenic
[01:02:17.760 --> 01:02:21.440]  fish that allows us to see response to these chemicals in the bodies of the fish in real
[01:02:21.440 --> 01:02:27.240]  time, for example, we have shown that estrogens found in some plastics affect the valves in
[01:02:27.240 --> 01:02:31.840]  the heart. Other research has shown that many other chemicals that are being discharged
[01:02:31.840 --> 01:02:36.640]  through sewage treatment works can affect fish, including antidepressant drugs that
[01:02:36.640 --> 01:02:41.640]  reduce the natural shyness of some fish species, including the way they react to predators.
[01:02:41.640 --> 01:02:46.640]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently in for sponsors. If you have a product or a service
[01:02:46.640 --> 01:02:51.640]  you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to get in and call it 210-363-2257. This was
[01:02:51.640 --> 01:02:58.640]  Rick Brody with your Lowdown for July 3rd, 2017.
[01:03:21.640 --> 01:03:31.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Real Low Radio on this, the 6th day of July
[01:03:31.200 --> 01:03:40.040]  2017 and we're talking to Scott in Texas. Yes, absolutely, we can see these guys and
[01:03:40.040 --> 01:03:46.720]  we need to. I filed criminal charges against a federal judge, Federal Judge McBride, out
[01:03:46.720 --> 01:03:57.000]  of Fort Worth, for he dismissed my petition for declaratory judgment with prejudice for
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:02.920]  failure to state a claim on which a cubby can be had. It was a quiet title action. It
[01:04:02.920 --> 01:04:09.720]  didn't ask for recovery. It asked for a declaration of the rights of the parties. So he created
[01:04:09.720 --> 01:04:16.800]  a claim that didn't exist and then ruled that the claim was insufficient and dismissed
[01:04:16.800 --> 01:04:23.640]  with prejudice. So I filed criminal charges against him with the SAC, the Special Agent
[01:04:23.640 --> 01:04:30.480]  Charge in Dallas and I'll be pursuing that. And I liked the idea better of filing against
[01:04:30.480 --> 01:04:40.480]  him with a local grand jury. So absolutely, Scott, you can do that.
[01:04:40.480 --> 01:04:46.160]  That sounds like it's going to be, the general consensus is you take them to small claims
[01:04:46.160 --> 01:04:52.520]  court and then ask them all your questions for discovery, then non-suit and then move
[01:04:52.520 --> 01:05:00.160]  it up to a state court and then plug it in for a higher dollar amount. But it would just
[01:05:00.160 --> 01:05:07.880]  be so much fun to drag one of these guys into a small claims court and watch their whole
[01:05:07.880 --> 01:05:16.640]  demeanor just get confounded because they're a federal judge in a small claims court. It
[01:05:16.640 --> 01:05:17.880]  would just be funny.
[01:05:17.880 --> 01:05:25.320]  Yeah. And they think they're immune because no lawyer is going to take on a federal judge
[01:05:25.320 --> 01:05:33.480]  because that's not his bar card in a heartbeat. But you don't go in there dangling by your
[01:05:33.480 --> 01:05:45.600]  bar card. And when you're the one, when you're the one making the claim, you know, the police
[01:05:45.600 --> 01:05:54.760]  and the local prosecutors, they're used to being the ones bringing the fight to you.
[01:05:54.760 --> 01:05:58.640]  When you're the plaintiff, when you're taking the fight to them and they're in the defensive
[01:05:58.640 --> 01:06:08.360]  position, they are the dumbest people you'll ever come across. They do the stupidest things.
[01:06:08.360 --> 01:06:15.400]  I just went before a judge with a friend of mine in the town I live in, unbelievable
[01:06:15.400 --> 01:06:22.440]  how dumb he was. We filed my challenge, subject matter jurisdiction. The lawyer took three
[01:06:22.440 --> 01:06:34.480]  months to answer it. We get into court and they hand him the response in court. He objected
[01:06:34.480 --> 01:06:39.920]  to it because it was required to be given to him seven days before the hearing. The judge
[01:06:39.920 --> 01:06:46.280]  allowed it in anyway, never read it, obviously never read the challenge, subject matter jurisdiction
[01:06:46.280 --> 01:06:57.760]  and denied it. Well, good luck, Bubba. See how that works for you. So now we're going
[01:06:57.760 --> 01:07:03.840]  after him and they're not used to people coming back after them. They're not used to someone
[01:07:03.840 --> 01:07:09.240]  going in and setting them up so that they can go back after them. This ought to really
[01:07:09.240 --> 01:07:19.280]  be interesting. The fact that you're the plaintiff, it makes you a protected class. Once you
[01:07:19.280 --> 01:07:26.680]  sue that federal magistrate, if anybody says anything to you, if they come and give you
[01:07:26.680 --> 01:07:34.320]  another ticket, you accuse the federal magistrate of retaliating against you. You file a complaint
[01:07:34.320 --> 01:07:40.560]  against the magistrate and accuse him of sending that cop out to harass you because you sued
[01:07:40.560 --> 01:07:47.240]  the magistrate. What, the magistrate had nothing to do with it? Well, he's going to go ballistic.
[01:07:47.240 --> 01:07:56.120]  Hey, it's all politics, guys. Yeah, I just think it would be a real hoot to take one
[01:07:56.120 --> 01:08:01.120]  of these guys. Well, I got a couple of them and that's the beauty of it is because they
[01:08:01.120 --> 01:08:08.400]  already did this and now it does look like they were denying due process and trying to
[01:08:08.400 --> 01:08:14.760]  hamstring everything up six ways from Sunday. But then when I actually did qualify for food
[01:08:14.760 --> 01:08:21.120]  stamps, now they look like an idiot and these other three cases that I have going on in
[01:08:21.120 --> 01:08:28.200]  federal court, they already are kind of aware that I filed, that I have food stamps or something
[01:08:28.200 --> 01:08:35.120]  because of something I filed a few weeks ago and I'm going to have to go back and put some
[01:08:35.120 --> 01:08:40.320]  more paper in to get them to move because they just won't do it. They stuck everything
[01:08:40.320 --> 01:08:49.440]  on the back burner and pretended like I just disappeared. But since I actually have this
[01:08:49.440 --> 01:08:56.760]  card now, I could go after those two that were shielded in these county judges and it
[01:08:56.760 --> 01:09:02.280]  will damn sure look like that. Yeah, they were doing everything they could to deny
[01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:08.760]  me access to the court by not saying I wasn't poor enough and, yeah, I come to find out
[01:09:08.760 --> 01:09:14.720]  he was poor enough. This really ties them up pretty good, I think.
[01:09:14.720 --> 01:09:21.480]  Look close at shielding from prosecution, 3805 penal code.
[01:09:21.480 --> 01:09:30.040]  That's pretty serious crime in the state of Texas. And for the most part, they never
[01:09:30.040 --> 01:09:43.120]  see these codes used. I speak a lot to 2202B2A, Texas penal code. And no one has ever been
[01:09:43.120 --> 01:09:52.160]  prosecuted for that statute since it wasn't acted because it's against public officials.
[01:09:52.160 --> 01:10:06.040]  Now 2202B2B, I stopped getting the return stopped at 30,000 hits. B2B is when someone
[01:10:06.040 --> 01:10:12.040]  commits aggravated assault against a public official. B2A is when the public official
[01:10:12.040 --> 01:10:19.720]  commits aggravated assault against a citizen acting under the color of an official capacity.
[01:10:19.720 --> 01:10:25.280]  Never has a public official been prosecuted under that statute. So they're not used to
[01:10:25.280 --> 01:10:34.080]  it. When I talked to a sheriff's lieutenant on the sheriff's department today, I filed
[01:10:34.080 --> 01:10:40.920]  that against one of his deputies. He didn't know how to deal with me. I told him the guy
[01:10:40.920 --> 01:10:47.280]  pulled me over, and he told me the reason that he pulled me over was my registration
[01:10:47.280 --> 01:10:55.640]  was expired. And I told him, only two years, what's the problem? So he took my license
[01:10:55.640 --> 01:11:00.240]  to go back and write the ticket, and I took out my cell phone called 911 and asked him
[01:11:00.240 --> 01:11:06.280]  to come out and arrest him for first degree felony aggravated assault. Then I walked
[01:11:06.280 --> 01:11:15.120]  him down the code. This is how I got there. He actually sidetracked it before I got all
[01:11:15.120 --> 01:11:24.200]  the way through. He really did not want to hear how I got there. But they're being very
[01:11:24.200 --> 01:11:29.720]  careful with me, and that's good to see. They're not taking me for granted, especially since
[01:11:29.720 --> 01:11:34.280]  I put the district judge in front of the grand jury. But the district judge I put in front
[01:11:34.280 --> 01:11:43.520]  of the grand jury, he just passed away. And I kind of hated that because I never disliked
[01:11:43.520 --> 01:11:52.320]  him. He was actually real accommodating. He always gave me stuff I could do. Now, he
[01:11:52.320 --> 01:12:00.000]  never, he really hated me, but that was okay. I didn't really dislike him. I thought he was
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:06.240]  very convenient. I hated to see him up and down on me. Now I'm going to have to train
[01:12:06.240 --> 01:12:15.080]  a new judge. But anyway, they're not used to you coming back and taking them on. When
[01:12:15.080 --> 01:12:20.720]  you do, they just don't get it. They don't handle themselves well, and they just make
[01:12:20.720 --> 01:12:26.480]  more and more mistakes. So once you've run one or two of them through the ringer, you
[01:12:26.480 --> 01:12:35.160]  know, Judge McBride, I filed criminal charges against him. A friend of mine just took my
[01:12:35.160 --> 01:12:43.920]  quiet title action on a different property and filed it. Exact same pleading. McBride
[01:12:43.920 --> 01:12:53.640]  did not dismiss this one. He's been, he apparently give it to one of his clerks, and they're
[01:12:53.640 --> 01:12:59.400]  going through it. But unlike mine, that he dismissed with prejudice immediately. He didn't
[01:12:59.400 --> 01:13:04.960]  dismiss this one. I said, don't think he liked me coming after him criminally. Because I
[01:13:04.960 --> 01:13:12.120]  know that when I filed this with the, you know, this SAC, the Special Agent in Charge
[01:13:12.120 --> 01:13:18.680]  in Dallas, they contacted a judge to find out what was going on. That this guy's trying
[01:13:18.680 --> 01:13:26.360]  to get us to prosecute you. And I told them when they had someone call me that they don't
[01:13:26.360 --> 01:13:32.360]  have to worry guys. I'm not really after the judge. This is a setup. There's something
[01:13:32.360 --> 01:13:36.840]  you guys are supposed to do, and I'm sure you don't know what it is, and I'm not going
[01:13:36.840 --> 01:13:42.160]  to tell you. So they're wondering what I got planned for them. They're going to the judge
[01:13:42.160 --> 01:13:47.000]  to try to find out. And then the judge finds out that I'm trying to get him prosecuted
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:53.720]  criminally. It gets their attention. This is a 90 year old judge. He's kind of setting
[01:13:53.720 --> 01:14:00.400]  his ways, but only kind of setting their ways. They get a pro say hammering them good and
[01:14:00.400 --> 01:14:06.320]  hard. We get changes made. So stay after him, Scott.
[01:14:06.320 --> 01:14:12.120]  I will. And I'll let you get to the next caller.
[01:14:12.120 --> 01:14:18.560]  Okay. Thank you, Scott. Okay. Now we're going to Kenny in Texas. Hello, Kenny.
[01:14:18.560 --> 01:14:24.560]  Hey, Randy. Thank you for taking my call. Good evening to you. Can you hear me?
[01:14:24.560 --> 01:14:29.480]  Good evening. Yes, I can. And what do you have for us today?
[01:14:29.480 --> 01:14:37.080]  Well, I want to congratulate you on your ticket website. TRIFFIT TRIFFIT TIFTIT web
[01:14:37.080 --> 01:14:49.560]  site. It's wonderful. I love it. It's a great thing to have as a source. And just to put
[01:14:49.560 --> 01:14:56.200]  context around my situation for the listeners. I live in Dickinson, just south of Houston,
[01:14:56.200 --> 01:15:09.200]  and I got a little, I got a ticket for, it says Disregard Stop Sign. And it says TRC
[01:15:09.200 --> 01:15:19.600]  544.010. Okay. Municipal Dickinson. So anyway, I got all your pleadings and some from Eddie
[01:15:19.600 --> 01:15:26.600]  as well. I have a seminar. And anyway, I, the clerk would not take those pleadings,
[01:15:26.600 --> 01:15:37.800]  so I mailed them certified into the court and showed up on time. Again, like you said,
[01:15:37.800 --> 01:15:44.840]  there was no magistrate for an examining trial. I kept waiting for the clerk to ask me how
[01:15:44.840 --> 01:15:51.000]  I wanted to plead, but for her credit, she did not. So she asked me how I wanted to handle
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:58.680]  it. And I said, well, I'm not quite sure. And so I want to, you know, I want to fight
[01:15:58.680 --> 01:16:03.800]  it. And so she set a hearing up, which I thought would be, she said, you can talk to the judge
[01:16:03.800 --> 01:16:11.160]  and do your pleading. She wouldn't take my pleadings. So anyway, I sent them in. And
[01:16:11.160 --> 01:16:18.560]  when I, when I went to the second meeting, which I thought was going to be an examining
[01:16:18.560 --> 01:16:29.800]  trial, it was for an arrangement. And so wonderful. Yeah. The judge would not hear any discussion
[01:16:29.800 --> 01:16:39.000]  at all. I tried to get in that deflation to plead. I hear the music. Okay. Hang on. We're
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:46.240]  going to have fun with this cause this is getting to the second part on the traffic website
[01:16:46.240 --> 01:16:51.040]  that I'm working on. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Wheel of Law Radio, we'll
[01:16:51.040 --> 01:17:00.240]  be right back.
[01:17:00.240 --> 01:17:04.920]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:08.920]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fit. I'd be
[01:17:08.920 --> 01:17:13.800]  lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to
[01:17:13.800 --> 01:17:17.640]  volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:17:17.640 --> 01:17:23.920]  to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:23.920 --> 01:17:28.320]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. But order in your supplies
[01:17:28.320 --> 01:17:33.920]  or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to logosregulnetwork.com.
[01:17:33.920 --> 01:17:40.040]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon,
[01:17:40.040 --> 01:17:45.920]  you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything
[01:17:45.920 --> 01:17:51.920]  different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving
[01:17:51.920 --> 01:17:57.600]  without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are
[01:17:57.600 --> 01:18:06.920]  Logos. Happy Holidays, Logos. It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser, sponsored
[01:18:06.920 --> 01:18:13.320]  by Central Texas Gun Works, Defense Distributed in Fapsal, Delhi. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:18:13.320 --> 01:18:18.600]  and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gun Works,
[01:18:18.600 --> 01:18:25.920]  first place up for grabs are Spikes Tactical AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G-2 9mm
[01:18:25.920 --> 01:18:32.640]  pistol. From Defense Distributed, third place, the AR-308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15
[01:18:32.640 --> 01:18:39.320]  80% lower. From Fapsal, Delhi, fifth place, $100 gift card for Fapsal, Delhi. Every $25
[01:18:39.320 --> 01:18:45.120]  donation is a chance to win. That's the LogosRadioNetwork.com. Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's
[01:18:45.120 --> 01:18:50.200]  e-book, Legal101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar,
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:55.880]  get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to Logos
[01:18:55.880 --> 01:19:02.880]  RadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:19:25.880 --> 01:19:44.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens of Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to
[01:19:44.040 --> 01:19:54.760]  Kenny in Texas. And Kenny, when you go to the traffic website, I have a set of pleadings
[01:19:54.760 --> 01:20:04.280]  that are essentially generic and apply to any case, any traffic case. The website does
[01:20:04.280 --> 01:20:11.080]  not go to the merits at all. We don't even care what you were charged with. It goes to
[01:20:11.080 --> 01:20:20.760]  the first issue, the authority of the policeman to write the ticket in the first place. Now,
[01:20:20.760 --> 01:20:28.680]  that's really not a part of... Kenny, you're getting a horrible background noise. That's
[01:20:28.680 --> 01:20:37.400]  not a part of the litigation engine, the electronic lawyer that we're putting together. Actually,
[01:20:37.400 --> 01:20:47.560]  this week I finished working out the technology for the electronic lawyer. There's some relatively
[01:20:47.560 --> 01:20:53.400]  sophisticated conversions I had to make to get this thing to work. But I've got it worked
[01:20:53.400 --> 01:21:03.120]  out and I'm in the process of laying in all my form fields now. So, I build this questionnaire.
[01:21:03.120 --> 01:21:11.680]  And the questionnaire is based on due process. Due process says that the courts are required
[01:21:11.680 --> 01:21:17.560]  to do these things and follow these steps. And one of the things that's actually in there
[01:21:17.560 --> 01:21:26.960]  is goes to arraignment. The arraignment issue is addressed in the challenge to subject matter
[01:21:26.960 --> 01:21:38.200]  jurisdiction. And I talk about how a municipal court... Kenny, I'm having to keep you muted
[01:21:38.200 --> 01:21:45.760]  because you've got some really... Are you on a speakerphone? No, sir. No, sir. I'm on
[01:21:45.760 --> 01:21:56.480]  my cell phone. I'm getting some really loud feedback of some type. Is that better? Okay.
[01:21:56.480 --> 01:22:06.080]  That's much better. Okay. I'm not moving. Oh, okay. There are a municipal court or a justice
[01:22:06.080 --> 01:22:15.920]  of the peace court simply cannot hold an arraignment. And when you go to that second hearing, I'll
[01:22:15.920 --> 01:22:24.760]  have this... I actually have the questionnaire up and on the website. If you go to the website
[01:22:24.760 --> 01:22:35.760]  and look in the map at the top and find the court hearings and click on first appearance,
[01:22:35.760 --> 01:22:43.880]  that'll take you to a page that discusses what happens the first time you appear. What
[01:22:43.880 --> 01:22:50.480]  they're required to do as opposed to what they actually do. And you had read enough
[01:22:50.480 --> 01:22:54.440]  on that site and listened to us enough that you already knew what they were supposed to
[01:22:54.440 --> 01:23:01.720]  be doing. So you go in there and they don't do any of that stuff. That works. And one
[01:23:01.720 --> 01:23:06.720]  of the things that's in my explanations is they're doing it all wrong. But don't you
[01:23:06.720 --> 01:23:13.960]  dare tell them. No. Don't give them finger warning. No. Yeah, just let them screw up
[01:23:13.960 --> 01:23:31.400]  all they want to. All right. Now, go back... Go ahead. Prior to going to this arraignment,
[01:23:31.400 --> 01:23:40.600]  I had scanned on the official Dickinson City website. And under the municipal court page,
[01:23:40.600 --> 01:23:48.400]  there was a warning. If I did not plead or if you do not plead to everything on that
[01:23:48.400 --> 01:23:58.680]  ticket, a warrant for your arrest will be served and additional charges or failure to
[01:23:58.680 --> 01:24:08.920]  appear will be issued. Now, my question was, how in the world can I be there and not plead?
[01:24:08.920 --> 01:24:16.640]  But then, you know, then they're saying, I spare to appear. That's axiomatically impossible.
[01:24:16.640 --> 01:24:24.120]  So somebody's been tampering with the record and to get some sort of fake probable cause
[01:24:24.120 --> 01:24:31.240]  to issue this warrant. So I have a screen capture of all that and I plan on attaching
[01:24:31.240 --> 01:24:37.520]  that to my disciplinary complaint because I believe he's ultimately responsible for
[01:24:37.520 --> 01:24:47.280]  what goes in that public website. The judge is responding at Superior for all of the employees
[01:24:47.280 --> 01:24:54.440]  of the court. He's responsible for cleaning and direction. So whatever they do, they do
[01:24:54.440 --> 01:25:05.480]  in his name. So they actually say if you don't enter a plea that they will charge you with
[01:25:05.480 --> 01:25:13.400]  failure to appear. And that's indicating that even if you did appear and didn't give the
[01:25:13.400 --> 01:25:22.760]  clerk a plea that they'll charge you. When you said that the clerk wouldn't accept your
[01:25:22.760 --> 01:25:35.960]  filings, I would have called 911 immediately. 911 works real good or at least call over
[01:25:35.960 --> 01:25:41.960]  a bailiff. And when the clerk refuses to accept, tell the bailiff, I need you to arrest this
[01:25:41.960 --> 01:25:50.040]  woman or this man or this person. And they'll get all excited. And they'll say, okay, okay,
[01:25:50.040 --> 01:25:55.440]  I don't really need you to arrest him. But I do need you to take my criminal complaint
[01:25:55.440 --> 01:26:02.800]  to memorialize the fact that the clerk refused to perform her duty and denied me the right
[01:26:02.800 --> 01:26:09.680]  to petition the court for redress of grievance. That gets them excited.
[01:26:09.680 --> 01:26:17.280]  Yeah, I had talked to you via email and you said to go ahead and mail them in. So this
[01:26:17.280 --> 01:26:22.360]  is the good part that I wanted to share with the listeners tonight. When I got to the phone
[01:26:22.360 --> 01:26:30.280]  arraignment, I didn't know what to expect. Anyway, to the judge's credit, he said, well,
[01:26:30.280 --> 01:26:37.760]  I'm just going to enter in a not-filtered sentence. You can't decide. But then he said,
[01:26:37.760 --> 01:26:45.000]  these pleadings that you still in are jokes. And you have been in a serious voice up real
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:50.960]  nice and contorted a space limit. You better be very careful, because I can hold you in
[01:26:50.960 --> 01:26:58.400]  contempt and try and jail you. You better be very careful.
[01:26:58.400 --> 01:27:05.920]  I never interfere with someone when they're screwing up.
[01:27:05.920 --> 01:27:14.120]  Yeah, thanks to Scotch and Turner v. Driver, I did record the whole thing. So I have it
[01:27:14.120 --> 01:27:19.440]  on, you know, memorialize, you know, memorialize on tape.
[01:27:19.440 --> 01:27:30.440]  Okay, now you need to take that tape and turn it into a transcript. Do you have a good quality
[01:27:30.440 --> 01:27:38.200]  sound? Yes. Yes. Oh, good, good. Because you have noise in it. You know, if it's not very
[01:27:38.200 --> 01:27:47.440]  good quality, you can go, you can download Audacity 2. Okay. You can open the recording,
[01:27:47.440 --> 01:27:55.280]  you know, Audacity 2. I got one from a court in Newark, and it had a real loud hum in it.
[01:27:55.280 --> 01:28:08.240]  So you open it in there and you adjust the size of the sound wave so you can see the
[01:28:08.240 --> 01:28:15.360]  peaks. And you can see when people stop talking, even if you can't understand them, because
[01:28:15.360 --> 01:28:21.680]  you stop getting the high peaks and you got a flat spot. You go in and you can highlight
[01:28:21.680 --> 01:28:31.480]  that flat spot and then go up and to effects until Audacity 2 to make a sound profile, a
[01:28:31.480 --> 01:28:38.000]  noise profile. And it'll make a profile of that flat spot. Then you can tell it to delete
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.600]  the flat spot and it'll go through the whole thing. I had one you could barely hear what
[01:28:42.600 --> 01:28:48.600]  was going on. Ran that noise reduction on it and boom, it was gone. This snatched that
[01:28:48.600 --> 01:28:54.840]  noise right out of the middle, you get a good tape. So we do have some tape tools available.
[01:28:54.840 --> 01:29:05.240]  Once you have a relatively good quality recording, there are online tools. Call Graph is one
[01:29:05.240 --> 01:29:13.160]  of them that will listen to your tape, you know, like your phone listens to you and turns
[01:29:13.160 --> 01:29:20.560]  it into text. This will listen to your recording and turn it into text. And Call Graph does
[01:29:20.560 --> 01:29:25.200]  it for free. And then all you have to do is go through it and make some corrections where
[01:29:25.200 --> 01:29:30.240]  it doesn't hear right. Don't introduce the recording.
[01:29:30.240 --> 01:29:39.080]  I took his comments that the platings were a joke to mean that he was already prejudiced
[01:29:39.080 --> 01:29:49.200]  against me. Oh, well, the fact that he threatened you, that's a big deal. Hang on, Randy Kelton,
[01:29:49.200 --> 01:30:02.480]  they're receiving, we'll have our radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.480 --> 01:30:06.880]  Energy drinks are all the rage these days, but nowadays even young children are chugging
[01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:11.440]  beverages like Red Bull and Rockstar on the way to school. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht
[01:30:11.440 --> 01:30:15.760]  and I'll be back in a moment with more on this dangerous trend.
[01:30:15.760 --> 01:30:20.120]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:20.120 --> 01:30:25.720]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.720 --> 01:30:31.200]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:31.200 --> 01:30:37.000]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:44.520]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.520 --> 01:30:50.760]  They say that waking up is hard to do. It's tough rolling out of bed in the morning, but
[01:30:50.760 --> 01:30:56.320]  now even young people are turning to caffeinated energy drinks to kickstart their days. According
[01:30:56.320 --> 01:31:01.000]  to the Journal of Pediatrics, up to 50% of American youth are consuming them despite
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:06.080]  the risks. Many of these drinks contain large amounts of caffeine. 8 ounces of Red Bull,
[01:31:06.080 --> 01:31:10.720]  for example, contains about the same caffeine as a cup of coffee. Pediatricians caution
[01:31:10.720 --> 01:31:15.360]  that youngsters can have a difficult time handling the caffeine rush. While many kids just get
[01:31:15.360 --> 01:31:21.080]  wired or irritable, other potential effects include seizures, heart palpitations, strokes,
[01:31:21.080 --> 01:31:30.840]  or even sudden death. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.840 --> 01:31:36.240]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The
[01:31:36.240 --> 01:31:40.920]  government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:40.920 --> 01:31:45.200]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:45.200 --> 01:31:49.760]  given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:49.760 --> 01:31:52.800]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an
[01:31:52.800 --> 01:31:57.800]  Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.800 --> 01:32:02.760]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[01:32:02.760 --> 01:32:06.520]  Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come
[01:32:06.520 --> 01:32:10.280]  on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them
[01:32:10.280 --> 01:32:14.760]  to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails. I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.760 --> 01:32:18.560]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.560 --> 01:32:23.800]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus
[01:32:23.800 --> 01:32:27.920]  member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country
[01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:32.640]  Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call
[01:32:32.640 --> 01:32:41.040]  512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and
[01:32:41.040 --> 01:32:45.640]  we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.640 --> 01:32:53.640]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745.
[01:32:53.640 --> 01:32:59.120]  Or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean,
[01:32:59.120 --> 01:33:25.120]  I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:25.120 --> 01:33:44.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rive Law Radio. Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Rive
[01:33:44.200 --> 01:33:53.280]  Law Radio, and we're talking to Kenny in Texas. The big deal is this judge threatened
[01:33:53.280 --> 01:34:04.680]  you in order to prevent you from petitioning the court for redress of grievance. 3605,
[01:34:04.680 --> 01:34:17.960]  witness tampering, 3606, obstruction. Yes, sir. Well, I have it on recording, as I said.
[01:34:17.960 --> 01:34:26.000]  I had one quick question. Turvy driver specifically mentioned police filming was okay, but how
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:34.680]  does that translate into the rules of court? Am I exposing myself if I say I have a transcript
[01:34:34.680 --> 01:34:42.720]  based on a recording? No, no, you don't mention the recording. You have a transcript. And
[01:34:42.720 --> 01:34:49.320]  here's the deal with recording. They can only prevent recording if it interferes with the
[01:34:49.320 --> 01:34:58.280]  court. I was in Fort Worth and I went to the, I was going to a JP hearing and I told the
[01:34:58.280 --> 01:35:05.480]  clerks that I was going to record the hearings. And they had to go talk to the judge. They
[01:35:05.480 --> 01:35:10.400]  just come out and said there's no recording of these hearings that will interfere with
[01:35:10.400 --> 01:35:15.920]  the court proceedings. Oh, okay. And I turned to walk out and I stopped and turned back
[01:35:15.920 --> 01:35:22.280]  and I said, well, if I secretly record the proceedings, then they won't interfere with
[01:35:22.280 --> 01:35:31.440]  anything. There be no recording. He got real excited. It looks like we've lost Kenny. Kenny,
[01:35:31.440 --> 01:35:41.640]  are you still there? Okay, it looks like we've lost Kenny. But just make the transcript. If
[01:35:41.640 --> 01:35:48.200]  they question the veracity of the transcript, then you can introduce the recording. But
[01:35:48.200 --> 01:35:58.400]  the Fifth Circuit's authorization to enforce public officials references similar rulings
[01:35:58.400 --> 01:36:06.440]  by other circuits. And most of the other circuits are more general than the Fifth Circuit ruling.
[01:36:06.440 --> 01:36:13.440]  But since the Fifth Circuit bases its ruling on the others, the others clearly state like
[01:36:13.440 --> 01:36:23.640]  the one in New Jersey. I forget the guy's name. But it says that it is axiomatic that
[01:36:23.640 --> 01:36:29.640]  citizens have the right to record their public officials in the performance of their duties.
[01:36:29.640 --> 01:36:37.560]  You're not exposing yourself. One of the things I did in front of the sheriff today is I was
[01:36:37.560 --> 01:36:45.160]  there because I had filed criminal charges against a judge who I told him I intended
[01:36:45.160 --> 01:36:52.440]  to enforce to record and he forbade me to do that. So I charged him with official oppression.
[01:36:52.440 --> 01:37:01.120]  Did you get most of that, Kenny? I see you're back. Yes, yes. I got the important parts.
[01:37:01.120 --> 01:37:09.400]  Anyway, the only other question I'll wrap this up so other callers can maybe get in. The clerk
[01:37:09.400 --> 01:37:18.600]  is making me or she's keeping me from the court case file. She says I have to fill out a PI or
[01:37:18.600 --> 01:37:26.880]  like a regular 5.52 and wait 10 days. That should get a criminal complaint against the judge.
[01:37:26.880 --> 01:37:34.320]  I don't know how that policy that he has put in place is obstructing me from a timely
[01:37:34.320 --> 01:37:43.320]  asset. That goes to Rule 12 and Rule 12, the rules of civil procedure does not apply to a
[01:37:43.320 --> 01:37:51.280]  justice of the peace and municipal courts. It only applies to county and district courts.
[01:37:51.280 --> 01:38:00.080]  So file criminally against him. We get to run the routines on him. Violent judicial
[01:38:00.080 --> 01:38:06.200]  conduct complaint first and if the judge has a bar card file a bar grievance against him.
[01:38:06.200 --> 01:38:14.800]  I don't think he's a PIR with the city and he doesn't, they don't have it in the state
[01:38:14.800 --> 01:38:21.960]  bar association, they don't have him either. And so he doesn't have anything out there
[01:38:21.960 --> 01:38:28.360]  in the public domain that gives them a bar card even though he's supposed to be of city
[01:38:28.360 --> 01:38:37.480]  ordinance, he's supposed to be an attorney. Is it a court of record? No, sir. Okay, then
[01:38:37.480 --> 01:38:44.760]  he doesn't have to be an attorney. Yeah. So judicial conduct complaint, he'll be even
[01:38:44.760 --> 01:38:51.680]  more afraid of judicial conduct complaints if he's not an attorney. Yes, now the prosecutors
[01:38:51.680 --> 01:38:59.160]  are two, our subs, rotating in on two private contracted law firms. So I think we can bar
[01:38:59.160 --> 01:39:06.560]  grieve them and get their insurance up pretty good. So you bar grieve them a couple of times
[01:39:06.560 --> 01:39:13.240]  and they'll have to get a new law firm because this law firm hit the road. Yeah. On his,
[01:39:13.240 --> 01:39:21.920]  the officers close. You put three three offenses together. Is it more advantageous to break
[01:39:21.920 --> 01:39:27.000]  them up into separate and have three complaints issued? Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:36.760]  was actually I addressed official oppression first. It was the lowest when the officer
[01:39:36.760 --> 01:39:45.000]  pulls you over. When he didn't have authority to enforce the transportation code, he exerted
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  or purported to exert an authority he didn't didn't expressly have. However, at at the
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:40:01.520]  time of doing that, he was cloaked in a uniform of a police of a peace officer and presented
[01:40:01.520 --> 01:40:08.840]  himself as a police officer. Police officer was an authority he didn't have. So that was
[01:40:08.840 --> 01:40:16.840]  impersonating. That's a higher level offense for the same action. But he was also displaying
[01:40:16.840 --> 01:40:22.600]  a deadly weapon. So it up the offense to first degree felony aggravated assault. There's
[01:40:22.600 --> 01:40:29.000]  really not three charges there. There's just one. The other two were listed to show how
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:38.240]  I got to first degree felony aggravated assault. No, no, no advantage for tricky pulling them
[01:40:38.240 --> 01:40:45.920]  in to have key three key close complaints rather than one. No, because there would be an appropriate
[01:40:45.920 --> 01:40:55.000]  because you you'd be filing three complaints for the exact same behavior. Yes, okay, I
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:02.360]  understand. Well, yeah, we really don't want to ruin the officer's career. Oh, no, he was
[01:41:02.360 --> 01:41:09.280]  he was actually very polite and professional. Yeah, we want to give him plausible deniability.
[01:41:09.280 --> 01:41:16.520]  Yes. And I can almost guarantee you if the officer sees the way the judge is treating
[01:41:16.520 --> 01:41:23.480]  you and he was polite and professional, he is not going to like it. When I set up Judge
[01:41:23.480 --> 01:41:34.360]  Hayes and pulled the hearing aid trick on him. The bailiffs were absolutely a static.
[01:41:34.360 --> 01:41:42.000]  I went to a political meeting and they had security there. And I thought I recognized
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:47.320]  their security guard turned out he was that bailiff. He came and got me later on while
[01:41:47.320 --> 01:41:53.600]  I was in the pavilion and said, I have some people I'd like you to meet. And he took me
[01:41:53.600 --> 01:42:00.440]  over to his security guards. They're all bailiffs. And he said, This is the guy I told you about
[01:42:00.440 --> 01:42:07.560]  that set up judge Hayes. And they all came over shook my hands and just could not get
[01:42:07.560 --> 01:42:16.240]  over that. And the what these guys were saying about those judges, I was astounded. They hate
[01:42:16.240 --> 01:42:27.480]  those judges. So the policeman, we want to give. We don't want the policeman to feel
[01:42:27.480 --> 01:42:34.640]  like we're after him. We want him to have reason to go to his boss and say, Hey, you
[01:42:34.640 --> 01:42:39.120]  want to write these tickets? You go out there and write them. They're going to ruin my
[01:42:39.120 --> 01:42:49.320]  career and try to keep the police on our side. Can I do one for the chief of police as well?
[01:42:49.320 --> 01:42:58.880]  Absolutely. He's responding at superior officers out there doing it. You know, he's the one
[01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:13.800]  to send them out there. His career we handle. We can take his. As a matter of fact, I need
[01:43:13.800 --> 01:43:26.800]  to add that to the documents that I produce. But go to the traffic ticket website and look
[01:43:26.800 --> 01:43:34.600]  in them on the map at the top and find the appearances, the court hearings and click
[01:43:34.600 --> 01:43:39.440]  first appearance and go down to the bottom. And there's a leak down there that goes to
[01:43:39.440 --> 01:43:47.840]  my questionnaire and goes that I have explanations for each of the questions, why I ask them
[01:43:47.840 --> 01:43:53.720]  and what legal elements they go to and give you a real good idea of what they were supposed
[01:43:53.720 --> 01:44:00.720]  to do as compared to what they're actually doing. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:26.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:26.720 --> 01:44:33.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:56.720 --> 01:45:22.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:22.720 --> 01:45:29.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:52.720 --> 01:46:18.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:46:18.720 --> 01:46:33.720]  We'll be right back.
[01:46:33.720 --> 01:46:38.720]  Okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rula Radio. We're talking to Katie in Texas
[01:46:38.720 --> 01:46:44.320]  and Kenny. Go to the website. Go to the first appearance and go through what's supposed to
[01:46:44.320 --> 01:46:51.820]  happen. And then email me next week and I'll start putting together the documents that
[01:46:51.820 --> 01:46:54.320]  go with that questionnaire.
[01:46:54.320 --> 01:47:02.320]  Sure. Well, thank you for your time, Randy. And everybody remember to support the fundraiser.
[01:47:02.320 --> 01:47:07.320]  Plants could feed not only in your life but in everybody else's that benefits from this
[01:47:07.320 --> 01:47:10.320]  good subject matter. Thank y'all.
[01:47:10.320 --> 01:47:17.320]  Okay. Thank you, Kenny. Now we're going to Olivier in Tennessee. Hello, Olivier.
[01:47:17.320 --> 01:47:19.320]  Hello.
[01:47:19.320 --> 01:47:22.320]  Hello. We can hear you.
[01:47:22.320 --> 01:47:25.320]  All right. How you doing, Randy?
[01:47:25.320 --> 01:47:27.320]  Doing good.
[01:47:27.320 --> 01:47:28.320]  All right.
[01:47:28.320 --> 01:47:30.320]  What do you have for us today?
[01:47:30.320 --> 01:47:36.320]  Well, I wanted to share something but I want to, I know I'm not going to have enough time
[01:47:36.320 --> 01:47:41.320]  to talk about something else tomorrow but the main need of it but I want to tell you something
[01:47:41.320 --> 01:47:49.320]  and ask you a question. The question was I was reading part of our rules, court rules
[01:47:49.320 --> 01:48:03.320]  and I saw where it referred to dismissals that the court may dismiss a charge but they
[01:48:03.320 --> 01:48:13.320]  have the authority to dismiss the charge but that's only with the approval of the defendant.
[01:48:13.320 --> 01:48:19.320]  Wait, that doesn't sound right.
[01:48:19.320 --> 01:48:27.320]  Generally what the codes say is the judge can dismiss the charge with the approval of the
[01:48:27.320 --> 01:48:36.320]  prosecutor because it is the power that that is unusual.
[01:48:36.320 --> 01:48:37.320]  Yeah.
[01:48:37.320 --> 01:48:45.320]  They're not, basically they're not allowed to dismiss it unless the defendant agrees.
[01:48:45.320 --> 01:48:50.320]  And I read it over and over and over because it didn't make no sense to me because I figured
[01:48:50.320 --> 01:48:57.320]  a defendant would want it to be dismissed and the courts would want to get it settled and
[01:48:57.320 --> 01:49:06.320]  over with but dealing with the law, I know that they write things in order to protect
[01:49:06.320 --> 01:49:08.320]  certain issues or procedures.
[01:49:08.320 --> 01:49:11.320]  So I'm trying to figure out what.
[01:49:11.320 --> 01:49:19.320]  I can understand because I've objected to my cases being dismissed and the objection always
[01:49:19.320 --> 01:49:25.320]  was, was the case dismissed with prejudice?
[01:49:25.320 --> 01:49:34.320]  If it's not dismissed with prejudice, then the prosecutor is at liberty to re-bring the
[01:49:34.320 --> 01:49:36.320]  case at a later date.
[01:49:36.320 --> 01:49:42.320]  I'm here now, I'm ready to adjudicate this and get it done with.
[01:49:42.320 --> 01:49:48.320]  Don't want you to dismiss it and then bring it back and force me to do this again later.
[01:49:48.320 --> 01:49:56.320]  I've actually brought that objection in court.
[01:49:56.320 --> 01:50:01.320]  They called my name and the judge said, is the prosecution ready?
[01:50:01.320 --> 01:50:04.320]  The prosecutor said, no, your honor, the prosecutor is not ready.
[01:50:04.320 --> 01:50:05.320]  Case dismissed.
[01:50:05.320 --> 01:50:07.320]  I object, I object.
[01:50:07.320 --> 01:50:10.320]  Mr. Counten, you can't object to me dismissing it.
[01:50:10.320 --> 01:50:12.320]  Sure I can, Judge.
[01:50:12.320 --> 01:50:14.320]  We were just about to get to the good part.
[01:50:14.320 --> 01:50:17.320]  Get out of my court.
[01:50:17.320 --> 01:50:19.320]  That was Azel, Texas.
[01:50:19.320 --> 01:50:25.320]  So, yeah, I could see where someone would have an objection, but I certainly haven't
[01:50:25.320 --> 01:50:28.320]  seen it in law before.
[01:50:28.320 --> 01:50:32.320]  Yeah, it doesn't say anything about objection.
[01:50:32.320 --> 01:50:39.320]  It just said it's not allowed to do it unless the defendant agrees.
[01:50:39.320 --> 01:50:42.320]  Will you send me a link to that?
[01:50:42.320 --> 01:50:44.320]  I would like to look at that.
[01:50:44.320 --> 01:50:52.320]  It's not local court rules underneath dismissals, but I'll get it to you.
[01:50:52.320 --> 01:50:58.320]  I've been studying and checking and listening to everybody as I've been trying to find a
[01:50:58.320 --> 01:51:03.320]  way to communicate with people and help them understand or try to find a medium.
[01:51:03.320 --> 01:51:10.320]  But what I come to find out is that the whole logic of them trying to defend themselves
[01:51:10.320 --> 01:51:16.320]  is backwards because the language states that, okay, we have all these laws,
[01:51:16.320 --> 01:51:21.320]  Constitution, federal, state, but we're in the state right now.
[01:51:21.320 --> 01:51:33.320]  And the law states that we need to give the state opportunity to correct these offences.
[01:51:33.320 --> 01:51:43.320]  So, the right of locomotion is a federal objection or a federal standard.
[01:51:43.320 --> 01:51:51.320]  So, it's just arguing that now I see why people are having so much problems in court making
[01:51:51.320 --> 01:51:58.320]  these arguments because they are federal arguments and you're in a state court.
[01:51:58.320 --> 01:52:07.320]  And the state court provides, state has provisions which are equal to the Constitutional protections
[01:52:07.320 --> 01:52:12.320]  and they can't jump over these those state provisions.
[01:52:12.320 --> 01:52:17.320]  And the number one, what I've been realizing from reading Supreme Court cases,
[01:52:17.320 --> 01:52:25.320]  the number one law or rule that protects our right to locomotion that everybody wants to argue about,
[01:52:25.320 --> 01:52:34.320]  really, when it comes to, when I come look at it, is actually the right to free movement under personal liberty.
[01:52:34.320 --> 01:52:41.320]  And the warrantless search and seizure, every state statute,
[01:52:41.320 --> 01:52:51.320]  warrantless search and seizure statute in every state protects all the arguments that you want to argue
[01:52:51.320 --> 01:52:55.320]  about locomotion and all this other stuff.
[01:52:55.320 --> 01:52:59.320]  Most people are arguing the wrong argument and the wrong jurisdiction.
[01:52:59.320 --> 01:53:03.320]  We're speaking the wrong language to the wrong people.
[01:53:03.320 --> 01:53:09.320]  Exactly. It's hard for people to wrap their head around that.
[01:53:09.320 --> 01:53:19.320]  Before you go to federal issues, all your remedy is right there in the state court.
[01:53:19.320 --> 01:53:29.320]  I never go to the court quoting the Constitution because the Constitution does not grant you anything.
[01:53:29.320 --> 01:53:37.320]  The Constitution forbids state officials from interfering with certain of your rights.
[01:53:37.320 --> 01:53:42.320]  The Constitution limits authority of public officials.
[01:53:42.320 --> 01:53:44.320]  They don't grant you anything.
[01:53:44.320 --> 01:53:49.320]  So when you bring the constitutional provision into the state court,
[01:53:49.320 --> 01:54:02.320]  it's inappropriate because the state court will have a statute that reflects that provision in the federal court.
[01:54:02.320 --> 01:54:07.320]  I don't say I have a constitutional right to a public court.
[01:54:07.320 --> 01:54:14.320]  I say I have a right to a fair and public court under Texas.
[01:54:14.320 --> 01:54:19.320]  Code of criminal procedure 1.24, I believe.
[01:54:19.320 --> 01:54:22.320]  I turn the code, a 105 somewhere.
[01:54:22.320 --> 01:54:26.320]  I quote the statute, the state statute that gives it to me.
[01:54:26.320 --> 01:54:31.320]  That the local judge has to hear and has to adhere to.
[01:54:31.320 --> 01:54:41.320]  I'm glad to see you're getting this part.
[01:54:41.320 --> 01:54:49.320]  We have guys come in that try to take federal statutes and apply them to the states.
[01:54:49.320 --> 01:54:51.320]  And they're not getting it.
[01:54:51.320 --> 01:54:54.320]  Federal statutes don't apply to the states.
[01:54:54.320 --> 01:55:03.320]  Federal constitutional provisions that go to a procedural and substantive due process, they apply to the states.
[01:55:03.320 --> 01:55:07.320]  But the federal statutes are not state statutes.
[01:55:07.320 --> 01:55:10.320]  So don't quote those in the state court.
[01:55:10.320 --> 01:55:13.320]  They will ignore them.
[01:55:13.320 --> 01:55:16.320]  You have to quote the state law and all the remedies.
[01:55:16.320 --> 01:55:27.320]  Every state has a complete and well-structured jurisprudence, a corpus juris, body of law.
[01:55:27.320 --> 01:55:30.320]  We don't need to go outside.
[01:55:30.320 --> 01:55:34.320]  And you're doing exactly what you should do, Olivier.
[01:55:34.320 --> 01:55:35.320]  That's right.
[01:55:35.320 --> 01:55:41.320]  And as I learned, as I realized that, and we went and looked at it and I wondered,
[01:55:41.320 --> 01:55:48.320]  instead of that public offense committed, then I went to the Supreme Court and I went and researched public offense.
[01:55:48.320 --> 01:55:53.320]  And public offense committed is a criminal offense.
[01:55:53.320 --> 01:55:59.320]  When you go look at the traffic offenses, that's underneath another code.
[01:55:59.320 --> 01:56:02.320]  It's not underneath the criminal code.
[01:56:02.320 --> 01:56:05.320]  So that means if they don't have a charge underneath the criminal code,
[01:56:05.320 --> 01:56:18.320]  they switch up the language to make us who are not in form of their legal genre or whatever you call it, their legal language.
[01:56:18.320 --> 01:56:25.320]  So we won't understand that public offense means a felony, a criminal offense,
[01:56:25.320 --> 01:56:31.320]  not any of the million other codes that's there.
[01:56:31.320 --> 01:56:46.320]  They have a lot of other codes, but the criminal, the public offense is a felony underneath criminal charges, not traffic.
[01:56:46.320 --> 01:56:55.320]  And this is the part, I was talking to a sheriff's deputy today, and I was a lieutenant on the sheriff's department.
[01:56:55.320 --> 01:57:00.320]  And he already knew who I was, so he was being extremely careful with me.
[01:57:00.320 --> 01:57:03.320]  But he couldn't wrap his head around it.
[01:57:03.320 --> 01:57:09.320]  I referenced 701.001, and he said he was familiar with that.
[01:57:09.320 --> 01:57:12.320]  I said, did you read 701.003?
[01:57:12.320 --> 01:57:19.320]  701.001, I'll get that right in a second.
[01:57:19.320 --> 01:57:29.320]  701.001 says that the county commissioners court can appoint five deputies to enforce a transportation code.
[01:57:29.320 --> 01:57:32.320]  And I saw only five.
[01:57:32.320 --> 01:57:35.320]  701.003 says it got to be on motorcycles.
[01:57:35.320 --> 01:57:40.320]  He said he was familiar with 001, but not 003.
[01:57:40.320 --> 01:57:45.320]  Then why do you have all your officers out there enforcing the code?
[01:57:45.320 --> 01:57:47.320]  He said, because we can.
[01:57:47.320 --> 01:57:50.320]  I said, well, I catch them.
[01:57:50.320 --> 01:57:55.320]  I'm going to charge them with first degree felony aggravators assault, and it's just what I do to one of them.
[01:57:55.320 --> 01:58:10.320]  We say how that works out for them. They've been doing this this way for so long that they can't imagine it's not the way their bosses and their teachers have told them it is.
[01:58:10.320 --> 01:58:21.320]  But when you bring state code just the way you're doing and put it right in front of them, now you really get them dancing on the head of a pen.
[01:58:21.320 --> 01:58:25.320]  And you give the local officers plausible deniability.
[01:58:25.320 --> 01:58:27.320]  I am afraid we are out of time.
[01:58:27.320 --> 01:58:31.320]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, rule of law radio.
[01:58:31.320 --> 01:58:34.320]  You need to call back tomorrow night.
[01:58:34.320 --> 01:58:36.320]  I want to spend some more time on this.
[01:58:36.320 --> 01:58:39.320]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:58:39.320 --> 01:58:42.320]  We'll be back tomorrow night for our four hour info marathon.
[01:58:42.320 --> 01:58:50.320]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.320 --> 01:58:57.320]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version.
[01:58:57.320 --> 01:59:08.320]  The New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.320 --> 01:59:20.320]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.320 --> 01:59:30.320]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.320 --> 01:59:32.320]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.320 --> 01:59:40.320]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.320 --> 02:00:02.320]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.