[00:00.000 --> 00:07.760]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily
[00:07.760 --> 00:09.960]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:09.960 --> 00:23.360]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.360 --> 00:29.800]  Markets for Wednesday the 22nd of February 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,237.21
[00:29.800 --> 00:36.560]  an ounce, silver $18.01 an ounce, Texas crude $53.40 a barrel, and Bitcoin is still rising
[00:36.560 --> 00:45.720]  sitting at about $1,130 U.S. currency.
[00:45.720 --> 00:51.480]  Today in history, the year 1943, members of the White Rose Resistance, a nonviolent intellectual
[00:51.480 --> 00:55.760]  resistance group in Nazi Germany led by a group of students and a professor at the University
[00:55.760 --> 01:00.920]  of Munich that conducted an anonymous leaflet and graffiti campaign which called for active
[01:00.920 --> 01:06.120]  opposition against the Nazi regime, started on June 27, 1942 and ending with the arrest
[01:06.120 --> 01:12.480]  of the core group, Sophie Scholl, Hans Scholl, and Christoph Props by the Gustapo on February
[01:12.480 --> 01:19.560]  18 were executed today in history.
[01:19.560 --> 01:24.960]  In recent years, the Palestinian Baduin village of Can al-Amar near Jerusalem was raided by
[01:24.960 --> 01:29.440]  Israeli defense forces on Sunday after Israeli's government issued a demolition order for the
[01:29.440 --> 01:30.520]  Palestinian village.
[01:30.520 --> 01:34.560]  The IDF imposed a military closure on dozens of structures, homes, and the only school
[01:34.560 --> 01:39.440]  in the area giving residents just a few days until Thursday of this week to evacuate.
[01:39.440 --> 01:43.240]  It's estimated that 40 Palestinian homes in the central West Bank community are targeted
[01:43.240 --> 01:44.240]  for demolition.
[01:44.240 --> 01:49.160]  In 2014, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs identified
[01:49.160 --> 01:54.460]  the Can al-Amar village as one of the 46 settlements in the area that's at risk of forced relocation
[01:54.460 --> 01:55.460]  by Israel.
[01:55.460 --> 01:58.640]  Villagers were given construction termination warrants and will have a chance to present
[01:58.640 --> 02:01.120]  their case during a hearing on Thursday.
[02:01.120 --> 02:04.440]  Israeli officials maintain that the village was built illegally in the hotly disputed
[02:04.440 --> 02:14.720]  E1 corridor which physically links East Jerusalem and the Mali Adumim settlement.
[02:14.720 --> 02:18.360]  According to the Canadian Border Service Agency, more than 1,400 people have made claims at
[02:18.360 --> 02:23.280]  land border ports of entry in the region since November, which is more in the last four months
[02:23.280 --> 02:25.800]  than the entire year of 2015.
[02:25.800 --> 02:30.120]  Apparently a number of people seeking asylum has soared in the last year and spiked recently,
[02:30.120 --> 02:32.280]  with Quebec seeing the greatest numbers.
[02:32.280 --> 02:35.880]  Canadian authorities are saying that the migrants come from all over the world and ranging in
[02:35.880 --> 02:39.000]  all ages, from parents with infants to the elderly.
[02:39.000 --> 02:43.080]  Inspector Martin Roach of the Royal Canadian Mountain Police stated that since, quote,
[02:43.080 --> 02:46.960]  they're not reporting to the open port of entry, they're being placed under arrest and
[02:46.960 --> 02:50.600]  then interviewed to make sure there's no national security nexus.
[02:50.600 --> 02:57.600]  This is Kurt Brody with the Lowdown for February 22nd, 2017.
[03:20.600 --> 03:34.000]  OK, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Wheel of Love Radio on this, the 24th day of February 2017.
[03:34.000 --> 03:36.760]  Welcome to our four-hour info marathon.
[03:36.760 --> 03:38.200]  I have the phones on.
[03:38.200 --> 03:40.560]  I'll keep them on all night.
[03:40.560 --> 03:49.600]  Our call-in number is 512-646-1984, and I'm going to start out with a decision out of
[03:49.600 --> 04:02.480]  the Fifth Circuit, and the nature of the decision is, the way it came to the decision is especially
[04:02.480 --> 04:03.480]  gratifying.
[04:03.480 --> 04:15.440]  Turner, Philip Turner, a college student in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, went down to the
[04:15.440 --> 04:21.680]  Fort Worth police station and filmed the police, and they, as expected, the police came out
[04:21.680 --> 04:27.440]  and hopped up and down and got all excited and cuffed him and stuck him in the car for
[04:27.440 --> 04:30.120]  a while and then decided to release him.
[04:30.120 --> 04:36.600]  Well, so he filed suit, and we just got the decision out of the Fifth Circuit today.
[04:36.600 --> 04:39.120]  I was just reading it.
[04:39.120 --> 04:48.920]  One of my other listeners sent me a YouTube video, and I found a link to it, and the Fifth
[04:48.920 --> 04:55.080]  Circuit clearly established the right to record the police.
[04:55.080 --> 05:04.580]  What their position was is that this case actually ruled in favor of the police officers.
[05:04.580 --> 05:12.600]  The police officers were sued on 42 U.S. Code 1983, and they claimed that the right to film
[05:12.600 --> 05:22.840]  the police was not clearly established at the time, and the court agreed with them and
[05:22.840 --> 05:30.400]  granted them qualified immunity, but went on to uphold the right to film the police.
[05:30.400 --> 05:38.560]  So, it's clear now in the Fifth Circuit in Texas that we have a right to film our public
[05:38.560 --> 05:39.560]  officials.
[05:39.560 --> 05:52.600]  So, my next trip is going to be to a local court, and I'm going to film the court.
[05:52.600 --> 05:57.320]  And when the judge objects, Your Honor, I'm here filming the bailiffs.
[05:57.320 --> 06:04.680]  If you happen to get in the way, tough, but this should clear the way so that we can begin
[06:04.680 --> 06:08.520]  recording these courts.
[06:08.520 --> 06:12.360]  That will help to change everything.
[06:12.360 --> 06:18.600]  These courts have been saying that they could prevent us from filming.
[06:18.600 --> 06:22.720]  I had Judge Hayes, a Justice of the Peace out of Mansfield.
[06:22.720 --> 06:27.880]  Now, this guy's been a Justice of the Peace for a really long time.
[06:27.880 --> 06:33.480]  He's not a lawyer, but he can't pretend he didn't know better when he told me that it
[06:33.480 --> 06:42.280]  was illegal for him to keep a record of his court proceedings because he was not a court
[06:42.280 --> 06:43.280]  of record.
[06:43.280 --> 06:49.800]  I said, are you kidding me?
[06:49.800 --> 06:52.440]  That merely means you don't have to keep a record.
[06:52.440 --> 06:53.440]  Oh, no.
[06:53.440 --> 06:59.440]  He insisted that because it wasn't a court of record, he was forbidden to keep a record,
[06:59.440 --> 07:00.440]  and so was I.
[07:00.440 --> 07:03.440]  Now, that didn't make sense.
[07:03.440 --> 07:06.920]  Well, that's taken care of now.
[07:06.920 --> 07:13.480]  But in reading the opinion, I was struck with an issue.
[07:13.480 --> 07:22.040]  The courts granted these police officers qualified immunity because the right was not clearly
[07:22.040 --> 07:23.680]  established at the time.
[07:23.680 --> 07:26.200]  What the heck is that crap?
[07:26.200 --> 07:28.040]  The right was not clearly established.
[07:28.040 --> 07:32.280]  Of course it was clearly established.
[07:32.280 --> 07:35.320]  It's not a right that needs to be clearly established.
[07:35.320 --> 07:40.080]  It is a prohibition that needs to be clearly established.
[07:40.080 --> 07:43.160]  They've turned the law on its head.
[07:43.160 --> 07:49.200]  They've made it such that the police can do anything they want to unless they are specifically
[07:49.200 --> 07:52.280]  forbidden to do something.
[07:52.280 --> 07:56.320]  Now, that's backwards.
[07:56.320 --> 08:02.080]  The police may only do what they're specifically authorized to do.
[08:02.080 --> 08:11.120]  I guess that needs to be an issue brought before the courts for clarification.
[08:11.120 --> 08:13.400]  But right now, we can film.
[08:13.400 --> 08:19.440]  We've got a caller, Scott from Texas, and he's probably going to have something to say
[08:19.440 --> 08:20.440]  about this issue.
[08:20.440 --> 08:21.440]  Hello, Scott.
[08:21.440 --> 08:25.080]  Well, how are you doing tonight, Randy?
[08:25.080 --> 08:28.680]  Oh, I'm just dancing for joy.
[08:28.680 --> 08:40.360]  Well, I just want to have to kind of change the whole paradigm and the shift on the way
[08:40.360 --> 08:49.200]  everything is really...the way I've seen a bunch of changes that have overcome with
[08:49.200 --> 08:55.280]  the court system since I've been dealing with it.
[08:55.280 --> 08:59.080]  You're totally right about a lot of things.
[08:59.080 --> 09:06.760]  The training is part of it with the cops and all that stuff, but the whole problem is the
[09:06.760 --> 09:15.880]  way people are addressing when they are getting a citation with a cop or any interaction with
[09:15.880 --> 09:26.200]  a government official, because soon as a complaint is being made, you have to make a counterclaim.
[09:26.200 --> 09:36.680]  And I know you even balk at it when it's even mentioned, but as soon as you put in a counterclaim,
[09:36.680 --> 09:42.560]  stating that whatever claim that a person has made against you, because you even mentioned
[09:42.560 --> 09:49.720]  it on your show last night when you were talking about on a federal case, how as soon as a
[09:49.720 --> 09:55.760]  claim was made against the federal official that whatever charges were brought and he
[09:55.760 --> 10:04.280]  couldn't actually sustain those claims, then they ran away.
[10:04.280 --> 10:13.960]  The problem is that nobody is addressing these charges and making a counterclaim and then...
[10:13.960 --> 10:17.800]  Let me clarify how that works.
[10:17.800 --> 10:22.080]  You can't sustain a counterclaim in a criminal action.
[10:22.080 --> 10:25.680]  Criminal action is a special type of pleading.
[10:25.680 --> 10:36.600]  Well, Randy, check it out, because when Jody down in Polk County put in the counterclaim,
[10:36.600 --> 10:42.920]  the county court-at-law judge said he could not proceed with a criminal proceeding because
[10:42.920 --> 10:49.240]  this counterclaim was put in and it was a civil case now, and so it was waiting on a
[10:49.240 --> 10:52.160]  civil matter, so they had to sit all up on that.
[10:52.160 --> 10:55.880]  He actually admitted to it and set it aside.
[10:55.880 --> 10:56.880]  That's not in law.
[10:56.880 --> 10:59.560]  He just didn't know what he was doing.
[10:59.560 --> 11:03.280]  Well, no, he actually did know what he was doing.
[11:03.280 --> 11:06.080]  No, no, listen, listen.
[11:06.080 --> 11:10.720]  In order to make a claim, you have to file a civil action.
[11:10.720 --> 11:11.720]  Exactly.
[11:11.720 --> 11:18.240]  There's no accommodation in law for a counterclaim in a criminal action.
[11:18.240 --> 11:25.360]  The counterclaim was rebuking that and it was taking on a civil matter, so the judge
[11:25.360 --> 11:32.480]  actually admitted that this was a civil action and he had to wait until the civil proceeding
[11:32.480 --> 11:37.440]  would conclude before he could go ahead with the criminal.
[11:37.440 --> 11:42.320]  The only reason I know this actually happened because I sent it up to another guy in Missouri
[11:42.320 --> 11:49.480]  and the judge balked and had to wait and freaked out because they had a counterclaim in there
[11:49.480 --> 11:54.800]  and they didn't know what was going on because the claim was refuted from what it cost.
[11:54.800 --> 12:01.520]  Let me address an issue in the legal reform movement.
[12:01.520 --> 12:07.840]  We tend to do things that lawyers don't do.
[12:07.840 --> 12:14.960]  Sometimes we do things and the judge just has no idea how to handle it.
[12:14.960 --> 12:20.040]  When we do something like that and it gets us results, we think it's working because
[12:20.040 --> 12:25.560]  it's based on some kind of supportive law, when really it's based on the fact that the
[12:25.560 --> 12:27.720]  courts don't know what to do with it.
[12:27.720 --> 12:34.600]  They don't know yet how to handle this, so they back up so they can look to make sure
[12:34.600 --> 12:37.920]  they don't screw up.
[12:37.920 --> 12:44.320]  That's the problem because they're supposed to address any time a claim has been rebutted,
[12:44.320 --> 12:49.680]  they have to address that claim and if they don't, which they railroaded me several times
[12:49.680 --> 12:54.720]  as you well know through all my experiences, the only reason I know is because all these
[12:54.720 --> 13:01.440]  experiences I've seen come out to the outcome and then I went and filed federal lawsuits
[13:01.440 --> 13:08.000]  on them and now I'm addressing them in the federal court because of what has happened.
[13:08.000 --> 13:09.000]  Okay, hold on.
[13:09.000 --> 13:14.120]  Let's go back to making a claim in a criminal complaint.
[13:14.120 --> 13:17.440]  You just bumped me up against one of my rules.
[13:17.440 --> 13:18.440]  Sure.
[13:18.440 --> 13:24.000]  One of my rules is never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[13:24.000 --> 13:31.320]  While I'm saying this to you, I'm going inside and scanning around and trying to find something
[13:31.320 --> 13:43.600]  in law that says a criminal descendant may not make a counterclaim against the state.
[13:43.600 --> 13:46.520]  Well, the sad thing is-
[13:46.520 --> 13:48.480]  Wait a minute.
[13:48.480 --> 13:51.240]  I've never seen that anywhere.
[13:51.240 --> 13:57.200]  I've heard judges say it, but I've never seen that in law.
[13:57.200 --> 14:00.440]  It's not in the Code of Criminal Procedure anywhere.
[14:00.440 --> 14:03.520]  So you're saying it cannot happen, so it cannot happen?
[14:03.520 --> 14:04.520]  No, no, no.
[14:04.520 --> 14:05.520]  Wait, wait.
[14:05.520 --> 14:11.120]  I was saying it cannot happen and while I'm saying it cannot happen, I'm pulling out my
[14:11.120 --> 14:16.080]  rules and my rule was saying you're making a proactive statement of law out of your own
[14:16.080 --> 14:17.080]  mouth.
[14:17.080 --> 14:22.520]  You're not quoting code and I'm scanning my brain for the code.
[14:22.520 --> 14:24.800]  I can't find any.
[14:24.800 --> 14:29.080]  So you could well be right.
[14:29.080 --> 14:35.400]  It's federal procedure that it comes down to any claim that is made against you because
[14:35.400 --> 14:43.800]  all criminal cases, no matter what, even in federal law, it comes down to they are all
[14:43.800 --> 14:51.080]  civil proceedings and any claim that is made against you, you can file a counterclaim and
[14:51.080 --> 14:57.360]  you can claim... You can rebut the claim that's made against you and that's what's
[14:57.360 --> 15:04.720]  being made in a counterclaim, even in what you said last night when you were talking
[15:04.720 --> 15:09.520]  about that federal case with that guy that was on... He was having some kind of mess
[15:09.520 --> 15:18.200]  going on in Tennessee and you talked about a federal case where the guy actually filed
[15:18.200 --> 15:24.520]  a claim against the prosecutor and the prosecutor ran out of court because that's effectively
[15:24.520 --> 15:26.720]  almost like a counterclaim.
[15:26.720 --> 15:34.040]  Well, that was something that's... When you file a criminal complaint against the prosecutor,
[15:34.040 --> 15:39.480]  that's something you can actually do, but that's a separate case from the one that's
[15:39.480 --> 15:40.480]  against you.
[15:40.480 --> 15:41.640]  That's a counterclaim.
[15:41.640 --> 15:46.760]  Now you're effectively talking a counterclaim and it's different because you're suing.
[15:46.760 --> 15:47.760]  You're going back...
[15:47.760 --> 15:48.760]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[15:48.760 --> 15:50.360]  I'm trying to get to something.
[15:50.360 --> 15:53.160]  We're splitting things up here.
[15:53.160 --> 15:59.600]  First, you're saying that you can file a counterclaim in the criminal action.
[15:59.600 --> 16:06.760]  I would say no, you can't, but in thinking about it, I don't know of anything in law.
[16:06.760 --> 16:10.440]  I can't find anything in law that prevents it.
[16:10.440 --> 16:18.760]  It doesn't because it's been done, but here's the thing, the judges here in Dallas County
[16:18.760 --> 16:26.440]  railroaded me straight up over... I mean, railroaded me, but Jody down there in Kodak
[16:26.440 --> 16:34.160]  County, Pope County, the judge actually recognized it and I've seen another guy in Missouri,
[16:34.160 --> 16:35.160]  he recognized it.
[16:35.160 --> 16:36.160]  Take a look.
[16:36.160 --> 16:37.160]  I've heard of this happening before.
[16:37.160 --> 16:38.160]  Hang on.
[16:38.160 --> 16:45.240]  Dr. Goethebrecht, Randy Kelton, Brutabla Radio, we have our fundraiser on, so go to Logos
[16:45.240 --> 16:53.680]  Radio Network and check out our gun giveaway, and I've got the ebook up there and Eddie's
[16:53.680 --> 16:56.160]  traffic seminar, so help support this station.
[16:56.160 --> 16:57.160]  We'll be right back.
[16:57.160 --> 16:58.160]  Dang, cookies.
[16:58.160 --> 16:59.160]  Cookies?
[16:59.160 --> 17:00.160]  Me love cookies.
[17:00.160 --> 17:01.160]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:01.160 --> 17:02.160]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:02.160 --> 17:03.160]  Cookies?
[17:03.160 --> 17:04.160]  Yucky?
[17:04.160 --> 17:05.160]  No, no bad cookies.
[17:05.160 --> 17:06.160]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:06.160 --> 17:07.160]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:07.160 --> 17:08.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:08.160 --> 17:09.160]  No, they are cyber cookies.
[17:09.160 --> 17:10.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:10.160 --> 17:11.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:11.160 --> 17:12.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:12.160 --> 17:13.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:13.160 --> 17:14.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:14.160 --> 17:15.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:15.160 --> 17:16.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:16.160 --> 17:17.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:17.160 --> 17:18.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:18.160 --> 17:19.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:19.160 --> 17:20.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:20.160 --> 17:21.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:21.160 --> 17:22.160]  No, can't eat.
[17:22.160 --> 17:23.160]  Yucky cookies are cyber cookies, and they clog up your computer.
[17:23.160 --> 17:24.160]  These have apple.
[17:24.160 --> 17:25.160]  Really?
[17:25.160 --> 17:26.160]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:26.160 --> 17:27.160]  It's yummy apple.
[17:27.160 --> 17:28.160]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:28.160 --> 17:33.240]  I click Control, Shift, Delete, and then scroll down to Cookies, and clear them.
[17:33.240 --> 17:34.480]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.480 --> 17:40.160]  Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, and I click on the Amazon box in the upper right
[17:40.160 --> 17:41.160]  hand side.
[17:41.160 --> 17:47.160]  Mark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.160 --> 17:49.160]  New cookies for me?
[17:49.160 --> 17:51.160]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.160 --> 17:57.160]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too.
[17:57.160 --> 17:58.160]  B is for cookie.
[17:58.160 --> 18:00.160]  B is for classified.
[18:00.160 --> 18:05.160]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with song calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.160 --> 18:09.160]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.160 --> 18:15.160]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:15.160 --> 18:21.160]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.160 --> 18:25.160]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:25.160 --> 18:27.160]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.160 --> 18:29.160]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.160 --> 18:34.160]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.160 --> 18:39.160]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.160 --> 18:41.160]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.160 --> 18:47.160]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:47.160 --> 18:50.160]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.160 --> 18:52.160]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:52.160 --> 19:01.160]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:01.160 --> 19:05.160]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:05.160 --> 19:10.160]  Logosradio.com.
[19:16.160 --> 19:18.160]  Okay, we are back.
[19:18.160 --> 19:25.160]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 24th day of February 2017.
[19:25.160 --> 19:28.160]  And we're talking to Scott in Texas.
[19:28.160 --> 19:33.160]  So, I'm going to have to do some research on this, Scott.
[19:33.160 --> 19:47.160]  To see if I can find anything in law that would prevent a defendant from filing a counterclaim against the state.
[19:47.160 --> 19:49.160]  Well, here's the thing.
[19:49.160 --> 19:56.160]  As soon as they make the claim, you make the counterclaim against them immediately.
[19:56.160 --> 19:58.160]  File it within 30 days.
[19:58.160 --> 20:00.160]  Because here's the rule of thumb.
[20:00.160 --> 20:12.160]  Soon as you are charged with a ticket, you have 30 days to answer that claim that they have made against you that you got this ticket, right?
[20:12.160 --> 20:17.160]  But they always said it later than 30 days that you have to go to court.
[20:17.160 --> 20:21.160]  So, technically, 30 days, you didn't answer that.
[20:21.160 --> 20:22.160]  Wait, wait, wait.
[20:22.160 --> 20:23.160]  It's always 10 days.
[20:23.160 --> 20:27.160]  The statute requires at least 10 days.
[20:27.160 --> 20:29.160]  But the statute doesn't...
[20:29.160 --> 20:33.160]  Here's kind of the crux of the issue, though.
[20:33.160 --> 20:41.160]  They're kind of mixing like common law and criminal law and maritime law and all these...
[20:41.160 --> 20:42.160]  No, no, no, no, no.
[20:42.160 --> 20:43.160]  Wait, wait, wait.
[20:43.160 --> 20:49.160]  What we're mixing here is the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Rules of Civil Procedure.
[20:49.160 --> 20:53.160]  The Rules of Civil Procedure give you 30 days to respond.
[20:53.160 --> 21:01.160]  But the Code of Criminal Procedure doesn't address a response at all because it doesn't require a response.
[21:01.160 --> 21:03.160]  Well, Steve, now we got a...
[21:03.160 --> 21:06.160]  As far as I can tell, there is no time limit.
[21:06.160 --> 21:16.160]  Well, Steve, but here's the deal because according to federal, all cases are civil.
[21:16.160 --> 21:22.160]  You take every criminal case and it's supposedly civil in nature.
[21:22.160 --> 21:23.160]  Yeah.
[21:23.160 --> 21:36.160]  Well, where they're going is a criminal case, the Code of Criminal Procedure is a subset of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
[21:36.160 --> 21:45.160]  And thereby, anything that's not specifically covered in the Code of Criminal Procedure would revert back to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
[21:45.160 --> 21:49.160]  So Code of Criminal Procedure doesn't address everything.
[21:49.160 --> 21:51.160]  It doesn't tell you how to file a motion.
[21:51.160 --> 21:54.160]  It doesn't tell you how a motion to be structured.
[21:54.160 --> 21:57.160]  It's all kind of stuff that's not in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[21:57.160 --> 22:00.160]  And so that'll go back to civil.
[22:00.160 --> 22:05.160]  That's how they're saying that they're all essentially civil.
[22:05.160 --> 22:07.160]  Civil is precedent.
[22:07.160 --> 22:22.160]  So if we run on that assumption then 30 days, if you do not answer the complaint that they filed against you by counterclaim, blah, blah, blah, then now you're in default.
[22:22.160 --> 22:29.160]  Well, once you're in default, you're always in a defensive position trying to defend your way out of this case.
[22:29.160 --> 22:43.160]  And now you have a problem because what you're not addressing is they're violating your rights because they have usurped your rights by their constitutional limitations.
[22:43.160 --> 22:52.160]  And now you need to assert your rights by going as a plaintiff and suing.
[22:52.160 --> 23:01.160]  That's why I have filed a $33 million lawsuit against the Rockwell County Judge the other day, just this last week.
[23:01.160 --> 23:19.160]  And I'm fixing to put one on the Dallas County Judge for $66 million Monday morning for violating the Brady policy because they don't even have the mandatory training to have these officers out there
[23:19.160 --> 23:22.160]  and already had the FOIA request answered.
[23:22.160 --> 23:27.160]  So I already have the answers because they don't even have anything.
[23:27.160 --> 23:29.160]  They don't have nothing.
[23:29.160 --> 23:35.160]  So all goes back to the whole thing was a complete setup.
[23:35.160 --> 23:36.160]  It is so sweet.
[23:36.160 --> 23:38.160]  It is like butter.
[23:38.160 --> 23:39.160]  Okay.
[23:39.160 --> 23:40.160]  And this is – okay.
[23:40.160 --> 23:45.160]  You have – you've got my attention.
[23:45.160 --> 23:49.160]  This sounds like great fun.
[23:49.160 --> 23:54.160]  I am putting together a set of pleadings for traffic tickets.
[23:54.160 --> 24:02.160]  And, you know, Scott, we've been making accusations against the officer and against the –
[24:02.160 --> 24:03.160]  Now, I'm not worried –
[24:03.160 --> 24:04.160]  – the jurisdiction, so –
[24:04.160 --> 24:10.160]  I'm going after the county judges because they are the ones that are allowing –
[24:10.160 --> 24:11.160]  I got that.
[24:11.160 --> 24:12.160]  I got that.
[24:12.160 --> 24:14.160]  We're going to go back us.
[24:14.160 --> 24:16.160]  We're talking about how.
[24:16.160 --> 24:25.160]  And the idea of immediately filing a counterclaim in the criminal case,
[24:25.160 --> 24:30.160]  unless I can find some law that prevents it.
[24:30.160 --> 24:34.160]  You know, anytime somebody comes after me in the courts,
[24:34.160 --> 24:40.160]  I tend to have the right to raise issues against them.
[24:40.160 --> 24:48.160]  I don't remember seeing anything in the code that prevented me from doing that in a criminal case.
[24:48.160 --> 24:55.160]  And this is part of the problems that everybody who deals in these areas have,
[24:55.160 --> 24:59.160]  the judges and the prosecutors and the lawyers.
[24:59.160 --> 25:04.160]  They do things the way people have always done things.
[25:04.160 --> 25:11.160]  And some things are so entrenched that we don't question them.
[25:11.160 --> 25:17.160]  It's hard sometimes to find those places where I should ask a question and I haven't.
[25:17.160 --> 25:20.160]  Now you made me feel stupid.
[25:20.160 --> 25:23.160]  And I bet you feel bad about that, don't you?
[25:23.160 --> 25:26.160]  Well, no, I don't, because I love you, man.
[25:26.160 --> 25:31.160]  You have been a big inspiration and a huge help to me, man.
[25:31.160 --> 25:35.160]  I just don't know. I mean, you taught me how to write some of this stuff.
[25:35.160 --> 25:39.160]  This is the part I like the best,
[25:39.160 --> 25:45.160]  when I find myself realizing something I've been doing the whole time
[25:45.160 --> 25:50.160]  and hadn't considered the ramifications of what I was doing.
[25:50.160 --> 25:53.160]  So this is great. This is great.
[25:53.160 --> 26:02.160]  Okay, so we start making the claim immediately, and how are they going to fight against it?
[26:02.160 --> 26:04.160]  Well, here's the thing.
[26:04.160 --> 26:08.160]  I mean, did you even hear some of the things I was saying?
[26:08.160 --> 26:12.160]  I don't know. Your microphone is pretty damn powerful.
[26:12.160 --> 26:16.160]  I was telling you, I love you, man. You taught me how to write.
[26:16.160 --> 26:18.160]  You did a lot of shit for me.
[26:18.160 --> 26:23.160]  I'm sorry. You did a lot of things for me.
[26:23.160 --> 26:28.160]  You know, I've learned so much.
[26:28.160 --> 26:33.160]  I mean, I've gone on a huge, huge learning curve.
[26:33.160 --> 26:38.160]  And once we found this, this is the whole crux of the issue,
[26:38.160 --> 26:47.160]  is all this comes down to the lack of training from the prosecutors to the cops.
[26:47.160 --> 26:52.160]  The cops are being used as skinny pigs at the expense of the county courts
[26:52.160 --> 26:58.160]  and the commissioners and the judges, and nobody's holding these people accountable.
[26:58.160 --> 27:01.160]  And guess what?
[27:01.160 --> 27:10.160]  It's time everybody figured out what is going on and started doing something about it.
[27:10.160 --> 27:15.160]  Well, good. And this would be a good approach.
[27:15.160 --> 27:22.160]  I'm building a set of pleadings that you can, once I have it worked out,
[27:22.160 --> 27:27.160]  I've been working on the technology for quite a while, and I've got most of the technology down,
[27:27.160 --> 27:30.160]  where you go on and fill out this questionnaire,
[27:30.160 --> 27:37.160]  and then the system will start spitting out all the documents that are indicated.
[27:37.160 --> 27:47.160]  And I intend that this system be pedantic in that it spits out everything.
[27:47.160 --> 27:53.160]  It doesn't miss anything. Bar grievances, judicial conduct complaints.
[27:53.160 --> 28:01.160]  I found the T-CLOS, the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement complaint forms,
[28:01.160 --> 28:08.160]  and I'll integrate those into the system so as you answer the questions,
[28:08.160 --> 28:15.160]  if an officer, like I was going through intoxication offenses,
[28:15.160 --> 28:28.160]  and the first paragraph says that if you are in a public place and you are intoxicated, it is a crime.
[28:28.160 --> 28:34.160]  But then it goes on to define a public place.
[28:34.160 --> 28:53.160]  A public place under this statute is a facility licensed to sell alcoholic beverages, period.
[28:53.160 --> 28:58.160]  That's it. It's the only place you can get public intox.
[28:58.160 --> 29:02.160]  If you're in a beer joint or convenience store and you're drunk.
[29:02.160 --> 29:03.160]  Right, right.
[29:03.160 --> 29:10.160]  Out on the street, in your yard, those are public places.
[29:10.160 --> 29:20.160]  So if the police officer arrests you in a generally public place for public intoxication,
[29:20.160 --> 29:25.160]  but it's not a location that's authorized to sell alcoholic beverages,
[29:25.160 --> 29:31.160]  that gets false arrest against the officer, a T-CLOS complaint against the officer,
[29:31.160 --> 29:36.160]  tampering with the government document if you wrote out the criminal complaint,
[29:36.160 --> 29:42.160]  stating that you were in a public place, you're stealing these guys good.
[29:42.160 --> 29:45.160]  All right. Well, I've got one case in point I want to point out.
[29:45.160 --> 29:48.160]  Yeah, but you can't get to it because we're out of time.
[29:48.160 --> 29:50.160]  Hang on. What?
[29:50.160 --> 29:52.160]  Break. Ready, Kelton?
[29:52.160 --> 30:03.160]  We'll be right back.
[30:03.160 --> 30:05.160]  Here's a get-rich-quick scheme for you.
[30:05.160 --> 30:09.160]  What would you do if your ATM machine wouldn't stop spitting out cash?
[30:09.160 --> 30:17.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you what one guy did with 1.5 million from a generous ATM in a moment.
[30:17.160 --> 30:19.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.160 --> 30:22.160]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.160 --> 30:27.160]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.160 --> 30:29.160]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.160 --> 30:33.160]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.160 --> 30:35.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.160 --> 30:38.160]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.160 --> 30:42.160]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.160 --> 30:46.160]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.160 --> 30:49.160]  Ronald Page must have thought he'd hit the lotto.
[30:49.160 --> 30:54.160]  A Bank of America teller accidentally changed his account to allow unlimited cash withdrawals,
[30:54.160 --> 30:57.160]  even though he only had 300 bucks in his account.
[30:57.160 --> 31:03.160]  For six whole months, Page cashed in, withdrawing 1.5 million dollars in all.
[31:03.160 --> 31:08.160]  Did he pack the cash in a suitcase and make for Switzerland or invest it and change his name?
[31:08.160 --> 31:09.160]  Nope.
[31:09.160 --> 31:14.160]  By the time the bank caught on, Page had gambled it all away at three Detroit casinos.
[31:14.160 --> 31:19.160]  Today, he's serving a 15-month prison sentence and has to pay back every cent.
[31:19.160 --> 31:21.160]  I guess he should have known when to fold.
[31:21.160 --> 31:31.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.160 --> 31:34.160]  Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth
[31:34.160 --> 31:37.160]  and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:37.160 --> 31:40.160]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:40.160 --> 31:42.160]  It does not contain chemicals or THC,
[31:42.160 --> 31:45.160]  it's non-GMO and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:45.160 --> 31:47.160]  Hemp protein powder burns fat,
[31:47.160 --> 31:49.160]  builds muscle, contains 53% protein,
[31:49.160 --> 31:52.160]  and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:52.160 --> 31:58.160]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[31:58.160 --> 32:02.160]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[32:02.160 --> 32:05.160]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.160 --> 32:08.160]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.160 --> 32:10.160]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.160 --> 32:13.160]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.160 --> 32:16.160]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.160 --> 32:17.160]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.160 --> 32:20.160]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.160 --> 32:22.160]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:22.160 --> 32:26.160]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.160 --> 32:29.160]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.160 --> 32:31.160]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.160 --> 32:33.160]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.160 --> 32:35.160]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.160 --> 32:37.160]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:37.160 --> 32:40.160]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.160 --> 32:42.160]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.160 --> 32:45.160]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.160 --> 32:47.160]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.160 --> 32:50.160]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.160 --> 32:52.160]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:52.160 --> 32:54.160]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.160 --> 32:57.160]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[32:57.160 --> 33:01.160]  we all want and deserve.
[33:01.160 --> 33:16.160]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[33:16.160 --> 33:18.160]  Okay, we are back.
[33:18.160 --> 33:21.160]  We're in the Calhoun, Rule of Law Radio.
[33:21.160 --> 33:27.160]  And over the break, I did a search for counterclaim in a criminal case
[33:27.160 --> 33:33.160]  and got some lawyer, Denise Carter, that answered the question
[33:33.160 --> 33:37.160]  that said you cannot file a counterclaim in a criminal case.
[33:37.160 --> 33:39.160]  But she didn't give any law to support that.
[33:39.160 --> 33:42.160]  She just said it.
[33:42.160 --> 33:43.160]  And did you give...
[33:43.160 --> 33:44.160]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[33:44.160 --> 33:54.160]  Did you just say that an attorney gave you his opinion about a counterclaim?
[33:54.160 --> 33:58.160]  This is just a response to a law.
[33:58.160 --> 34:02.160]  Which is an attorney's opinion, though, is that how that's the question?
[34:02.160 --> 34:04.160]  Yes, yes, it's an attorney's opinion.
[34:04.160 --> 34:09.160]  Oh, that doesn't rise to the level of law, though, does it?
[34:09.160 --> 34:13.160]  That doesn't rise to the level of anything.
[34:13.160 --> 34:16.160]  Because she stated it out of her own mouth.
[34:16.160 --> 34:19.160]  She didn't state it out of any case law or anything.
[34:19.160 --> 34:22.160]  So my question to her would be, where did you get that?
[34:22.160 --> 34:24.160]  Did you just make it up?
[34:24.160 --> 34:27.160]  Yeah, well, that's your opinion, though.
[34:27.160 --> 34:28.160]  Well, guess what?
[34:28.160 --> 34:30.160]  I got an opinion, too.
[34:30.160 --> 34:32.160]  Yours sucks.
[34:32.160 --> 34:36.160]  Yeah, well, that was my point, that she didn't give any support.
[34:36.160 --> 34:42.160]  And it could be that she was saying that the same way I was saying that.
[34:42.160 --> 34:44.160]  Well, I just said that.
[34:44.160 --> 34:46.160]  I just said, who the hell are you?
[34:46.160 --> 34:49.160]  Tell me your opinion better than mine.
[34:49.160 --> 34:53.160]  My point is, she was saying that not because it's law,
[34:53.160 --> 34:58.160]  but because it's the way things were always done and she never questioned it.
[34:58.160 --> 35:00.160]  Well, I just did.
[35:00.160 --> 35:02.160]  It's time to question it.
[35:02.160 --> 35:04.160]  Well, I just did.
[35:04.160 --> 35:06.160]  Yeah, but you didn't...
[35:06.160 --> 35:11.160]  Just questioning out in the air is irrelevant.
[35:11.160 --> 35:15.160]  Questioning it through the courts, that's relevant.
[35:15.160 --> 35:18.160]  Well, before a court.
[35:18.160 --> 35:20.160]  Well, you're doing that.
[35:20.160 --> 35:22.160]  Well, I'll get that answer,
[35:22.160 --> 35:27.160]  because I've got a friend going to court here next month,
[35:27.160 --> 35:32.160]  and we'll prepare a counterclaim and see how they dance with it.
[35:32.160 --> 35:40.160]  Well, I've already got several all over North Texas.
[35:40.160 --> 35:42.160]  Well, you're doing good.
[35:42.160 --> 35:46.160]  When you file civil suits, it really makes a difference.
[35:46.160 --> 35:50.160]  About 11 or 12 years ago,
[35:50.160 --> 35:55.160]  I filed an $11 million lawsuit against Denton County.
[35:55.160 --> 36:01.160]  Brandy, I got my fourth civil suit right now,
[36:01.160 --> 36:07.160]  and I'm filing my fifth Monday morning against Dallas County Clay Jenkins.
[36:07.160 --> 36:08.160]  I got that.
[36:08.160 --> 36:09.160]  You said that already.
[36:09.160 --> 36:10.160]  We got that.
[36:10.160 --> 36:12.160]  You're filing a lot of good ones.
[36:12.160 --> 36:15.160]  How many federal suits do you have so far?
[36:15.160 --> 36:17.160]  All of them are federal.
[36:17.160 --> 36:20.160]  Oh, wonderful.
[36:20.160 --> 36:21.160]  Okay, let me...
[36:21.160 --> 36:27.160]  I was telling you how effective these are, even if you don't win.
[36:27.160 --> 36:31.160]  I sued Denton County for $11 million about 12 years ago.
[36:31.160 --> 36:34.160]  I named 24 litigants.
[36:34.160 --> 36:39.160]  I accused each litigant of following policy.
[36:39.160 --> 36:42.160]  And in the first hearing,
[36:42.160 --> 36:46.160]  the lawyer got all the litigants to deny all accusations by Kelvin.
[36:46.160 --> 36:50.160]  And I told the judge, that's perjury,
[36:50.160 --> 36:55.160]  because all of the accusations I made are matters of public record.
[36:55.160 --> 37:00.160]  And for them to deny them, that's aggravated perjury.
[37:00.160 --> 37:03.160]  And it wasn't my intent to harm anyone.
[37:03.160 --> 37:05.160]  I wanted to get law changed.
[37:05.160 --> 37:07.160]  But if I pursue this case,
[37:07.160 --> 37:10.160]  I'm going to have to file aggravated perjury against every one of them.
[37:10.160 --> 37:14.160]  So I want you to tell that lawyer over there to instruct these people
[37:14.160 --> 37:20.160]  to withdraw their answer and file one that's not perjurious.
[37:20.160 --> 37:24.160]  And the judge said here, Mr. Kelvin, I don't have that authority.
[37:24.160 --> 37:28.160]  I said, well, I promised one of these litigants that I wouldn't allow this to harm her,
[37:28.160 --> 37:34.160]  so I have no option but to non-suit this case.
[37:34.160 --> 37:37.160]  So I filed a $11 million lawsuit.
[37:37.160 --> 37:40.160]  First hearing, I non-suited.
[37:40.160 --> 37:43.160]  Just a couple of weeks ago, I met a friend of mine
[37:43.160 --> 37:49.160]  who just got a job at the Wise County Sheriff's Department in the jail.
[37:49.160 --> 37:51.160]  But before she could go to work in the jail,
[37:51.160 --> 37:58.160]  she had to take a course on how to handle difficult people in Denton County.
[37:58.160 --> 38:04.160]  And they used someone as an example of a difficult person to handle.
[38:04.160 --> 38:07.160]  That person was me.
[38:07.160 --> 38:12.160]  And that's over a suit that I dropped almost immediately.
[38:12.160 --> 38:18.160]  You've got to know, these suits really get their attention.
[38:18.160 --> 38:21.160]  Well, here's the thing I want to tell everybody.
[38:21.160 --> 38:27.160]  Immediately, as soon as they get a ticket, no matter what,
[38:27.160 --> 38:31.160]  follow a counterclaim against that ticket,
[38:31.160 --> 38:35.160]  and you're going to have to be prepared to go to court and do all that stuff.
[38:35.160 --> 38:39.160]  But fight this crap, and because the whole thing,
[38:39.160 --> 38:44.160]  it's all being funded because everybody just rolls over.
[38:44.160 --> 38:51.160]  You know, here's a paradigm that a lot of people should think about really seriously.
[38:51.160 --> 38:55.160]  Why is the 99% ruled by the 1%?
[38:55.160 --> 39:04.160]  Well, let's just look at what is the average conviction, the traffic conviction rate, 99.6%.
[39:04.160 --> 39:09.160]  And we wonder why the 99% is ruled by the 1%.
[39:09.160 --> 39:12.160]  Look at traffic.
[39:12.160 --> 39:20.160]  It's always been that way, and it probably always will be that way.
[39:20.160 --> 39:22.160]  Is that a scary thought?
[39:22.160 --> 39:25.160]  No, it's kind of normal.
[39:25.160 --> 39:31.160]  The thing that's reassuring is that the 1%, like you,
[39:31.160 --> 39:36.160]  can march through these guys and work them over.
[39:36.160 --> 39:43.160]  And the 1% can make changes and adjustments.
[39:43.160 --> 39:47.160]  It's been this way forever, and we've been able to...
[39:47.160 --> 39:53.160]  The standard, Randy, Randy, Randy, Randy, we're setting the community standard.
[39:53.160 --> 39:57.160]  Yes.
[39:57.160 --> 39:58.160]  We set the standard.
[39:58.160 --> 40:08.160]  The 1% will do it, and we're 1% addressing this particular area.
[40:08.160 --> 40:14.160]  We have some other 1%ers addressing other areas.
[40:14.160 --> 40:21.160]  Everybody is the 1%er in the area that's most important to them.
[40:21.160 --> 40:30.160]  And we can't expect everybody to hold our values as important to them as we hold them to us.
[40:30.160 --> 40:36.160]  So we shouldn't get frustrated that people have other focuses.
[40:36.160 --> 40:45.160]  What, is your freedom, and I don't know, I just don't get where anybody could consider there less than their freedom
[40:45.160 --> 40:49.160]  and anything else less than that.
[40:49.160 --> 40:52.160]  I got three kids.
[40:52.160 --> 40:54.160]  My wife works two jobs.
[40:54.160 --> 40:56.160]  I work a job and a half.
[40:56.160 --> 41:03.160]  It's all I can do to keep my bills paid and try to keep from getting fired from my job.
[41:03.160 --> 41:06.160]  I got all I can handle.
[41:06.160 --> 41:08.160]  You're self-employed.
[41:08.160 --> 41:11.160]  No, I'm giving you an example.
[41:11.160 --> 41:16.160]  People have their own issues they have to deal with.
[41:16.160 --> 41:26.160]  There's a few of us that have the luxury of being able to stand up for what we believe in.
[41:26.160 --> 41:33.160]  No, it's the slave mentality, and if you want to stay a part of the slave mentality,
[41:33.160 --> 41:42.160]  which is the paradigm that has been in place for generations, it's time to break the chain.
[41:42.160 --> 41:52.160]  And if people don't want to accept that, they have to realize people will fucking make, I'm sorry, people will make happen.
[41:52.160 --> 42:02.160]  We'll suffer. Those who don't will suffer, but judge not that ye be not judged there, Bubba.
[42:02.160 --> 42:07.160]  Let's leave everybody to their own issues.
[42:07.160 --> 42:09.160]  This is what the show is about.
[42:09.160 --> 42:13.160]  I'm trying to find those who can step up and who are willing to step up,
[42:13.160 --> 42:20.160]  but I certainly don't hold any grudge against those who aren't able to.
[42:20.160 --> 42:24.160]  When they get in a position where they can, they'll step on up.
[42:24.160 --> 42:26.160]  Brandy, you are the mentor.
[42:26.160 --> 42:37.160]  You're part of the mentor generation that gives some of the guidance and some of the creation and thought that goes into this.
[42:37.160 --> 42:45.160]  And then the people are going to have to step up and make the, you know, understand what the changes are.
[42:45.160 --> 42:55.160]  And now that we figure out how to put all this into place, it's not that hard anymore.
[42:55.160 --> 43:00.160]  We know what their jobs are. We know what they're supposed to do.
[43:00.160 --> 43:07.160]  And, you know, we know how to start putting our voice into place.
[43:07.160 --> 43:13.160]  Even jobs start to make it, even, you know, don't underestimate the people.
[43:13.160 --> 43:16.160]  They cannot underestimate the people no more.
[43:16.160 --> 43:19.160]  We are not stupid.
[43:19.160 --> 43:31.160]  Right. How many people does Rockwall, Mesquite, Garland, people like you, do they need to get their attention?
[43:31.160 --> 43:34.160]  I don't understand the question.
[43:34.160 --> 43:36.160]  I think they only need one.
[43:36.160 --> 43:42.160]  You've got their attention, and you will get policies changed.
[43:42.160 --> 43:48.160]  These guys don't like having to defend federal lawsuits.
[43:48.160 --> 43:51.160]  And that will get them to change their positions.
[43:51.160 --> 43:55.160]  My suit was only a state lawsuit.
[43:55.160 --> 44:02.160]  And now they use me as an example of a difficult person to deal with.
[44:02.160 --> 44:06.160]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com.
[44:06.160 --> 44:12.160]  And I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas,
[44:12.160 --> 44:18.160]  behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.160 --> 44:22.160]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.160 --> 44:26.160]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil,
[44:26.160 --> 44:37.160]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.160 --> 44:43.160]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.160 --> 44:47.160]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.160 --> 45:01.160]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.160 --> 45:04.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.160 --> 45:11.160]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.160 --> 45:15.160]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.160 --> 45:19.160]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.160 --> 45:23.160]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.160 --> 45:28.160]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.160 --> 45:34.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.160 --> 45:39.160]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.160 --> 45:43.160]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.160 --> 45:49.160]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.160 --> 45:52.160]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.160 --> 46:15.160]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:15.160 --> 46:29.160]  Okay, we are back.
[46:29.160 --> 46:31.160]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:31.160 --> 46:32.160]  We're talking to Scott in Texas.
[46:32.160 --> 46:34.160]  Scott, we need to move on.
[46:34.160 --> 46:38.160]  Enough of this mutual admirer society.
[46:38.160 --> 46:41.160]  I've got a full board of callers.
[46:41.160 --> 46:43.160]  But keep us up to date.
[46:43.160 --> 46:46.160]  Now, how many did you file this week?
[46:46.160 --> 46:48.160]  How many suits?
[46:48.160 --> 46:56.160]  Well, like I say, y'all can go to my YouTube channel on Staffoo Radio and check it out.
[46:56.160 --> 47:04.160]  And I've got some stuff on there and some good videos you can listen to about
[47:04.160 --> 47:09.160]  setting the community standard and things about like that.
[47:09.160 --> 47:14.160]  But other than that, have a good evening.
[47:14.160 --> 47:15.160]  Okay.
[47:15.160 --> 47:16.160]  Thank you, Scott.
[47:16.160 --> 47:19.160]  Now we're going to go to Paul in Texas.
[47:19.160 --> 47:21.160]  Hello, Paul.
[47:21.160 --> 47:22.160]  Hello, Randy.
[47:22.160 --> 47:23.160]  How are you tonight?
[47:23.160 --> 47:25.160]  I am good.
[47:25.160 --> 47:31.160]  We got a new ruling from the Fifth Circuit that says we can videotape our cops.
[47:31.160 --> 47:35.160]  That means we can videotape the courts.
[47:35.160 --> 47:37.160]  Well, fantastic.
[47:37.160 --> 47:43.160]  Randy, what I would like to talk to you about tonight is a topic that I don't think you
[47:43.160 --> 47:46.160]  discuss very often.
[47:46.160 --> 48:01.160]  We filed a private trust transferring the title of 30 acres of land in Hill County, Texas.
[48:01.160 --> 48:11.160]  And we filed this 10-page deed on the 7th of January of this year.
[48:11.160 --> 48:22.160]  And we inadvertently, we did not include an address for the new trust that we created.
[48:22.160 --> 48:29.160]  And so the Hill County, and this is probably a real simple question,
[48:29.160 --> 48:37.160]  the Hill County Appraisal District mailed us a letter and is asking us to correct this
[48:37.160 --> 48:38.160]  deed.
[48:38.160 --> 48:44.160]  And I guess my first question is, do we need to file a new deed?
[48:44.160 --> 48:45.160]  Can we file?
[48:45.160 --> 48:46.160]  No, yeah.
[48:46.160 --> 48:54.160]  File a new deed and just title it corrected deed and reference the original deed that
[48:54.160 --> 49:00.160]  you filed by the number that the clerk gave the document.
[49:00.160 --> 49:11.160]  And note that the deed was filed inadvertently without a trust address and said the lack
[49:11.160 --> 49:15.160]  of address is corrected by this filing.
[49:15.160 --> 49:21.160]  Just something so a reasonable person of ordinary prudence can read it and understand that this
[49:21.160 --> 49:32.160]  does not change the substance of the original, we'll do quiet title or a quick claim.
[49:32.160 --> 49:37.160]  It merely adds an address, that's all.
[49:37.160 --> 49:44.160]  You need to do it that way so that the date of filing stays the date that this document
[49:44.160 --> 49:46.160]  was originally filed.
[49:46.160 --> 49:50.160]  Understood, understood.
[49:50.160 --> 50:01.160]  As I mentioned, we filed a 10-page document and they put a little bar-coded stamp, or
[50:01.160 --> 50:07.160]  it's actually a peel-off label, so they attached it to the document, the original document
[50:07.160 --> 50:08.160]  that we filed.
[50:08.160 --> 50:18.160]  And it clearly says 10 pages, including page 9 is Schedule A, is the legal description.
[50:18.160 --> 50:25.160]  Well, the letter that they sent us said that we didn't include a legal description.
[50:25.160 --> 50:31.160]  I'm just curious why this is such a...
[50:31.160 --> 50:39.160]  Okay, did you not, was it a mailing address that was not included?
[50:39.160 --> 50:40.160]  Correct.
[50:40.160 --> 50:44.160]  That's one issue that they addressed in the letter.
[50:44.160 --> 50:49.160]  You got clerks there and they screw things up.
[50:49.160 --> 50:53.160]  That's not going to be something that's very important.
[50:53.160 --> 50:58.160]  Here's the deal about something filed in the record.
[50:58.160 --> 51:05.160]  Anything filed in the record is presumed to be regular until it's challenged.
[51:05.160 --> 51:09.160]  Well, the clerk can't challenge it.
[51:09.160 --> 51:13.160]  What the clerk can do is ask you to correct an error and that's all.
[51:13.160 --> 51:20.160]  And if the clerk goofed up on what she asked you, they might have told whoever wrote this
[51:20.160 --> 51:23.160]  letter that you didn't have an address.
[51:23.160 --> 51:31.160]  And what mostly happens, error-wise, is people forget to put the property description.
[51:31.160 --> 51:37.160]  So she might have just mixed up which one she was supposed to request.
[51:37.160 --> 51:42.160]  But as to something legal, there's nothing legal implicated there.
[51:42.160 --> 51:45.160]  Okay, understood, understood.
[51:45.160 --> 51:51.160]  I sent you an email almost a year ago or at least nine or ten months ago.
[51:51.160 --> 52:01.160]  You had mentioned someone I think at Austin, Barry Watson, as being a private trust guru.
[52:01.160 --> 52:04.160]  Yes, he is my trust guy.
[52:04.160 --> 52:05.160]  Okay.
[52:05.160 --> 52:10.160]  If I can get him to put that guitar down.
[52:10.160 --> 52:19.160]  You indicated that you had forwarded my contact information and I never heard back from Barry.
[52:19.160 --> 52:23.160]  So I was wondering if he's still...
[52:23.160 --> 52:24.160]  Yeah, he's still around.
[52:24.160 --> 52:32.160]  If you will send me another one, I will send him one and chastise him severely.
[52:32.160 --> 52:37.160]  Maybe you can get him to donate to your beer fund.
[52:37.160 --> 52:38.160]  Maybe I can.
[52:38.160 --> 52:40.160]  Barry is really good people.
[52:40.160 --> 52:49.160]  He's my trust guy and he's also the most knowledgeable guy on income tax law that I have ever come across.
[52:49.160 --> 52:51.160]  Well, fantastic.
[52:51.160 --> 52:59.160]  He was a 20-year Los Angeles police officer and now he's a country western singer.
[52:59.160 --> 53:00.160]  My goodness.
[53:00.160 --> 53:01.160]  Interesting guy.
[53:01.160 --> 53:03.160]  Fantastic.
[53:03.160 --> 53:08.160]  Probably one of the nicest human beings you'll ever encounter.
[53:08.160 --> 53:11.160]  Well, I look forward to talking with him.
[53:11.160 --> 53:12.160]  Okay.
[53:12.160 --> 53:13.160]  Send me another email.
[53:13.160 --> 53:15.160]  I'll forward it to him.
[53:15.160 --> 53:16.160]  Thanks, Randy.
[53:16.160 --> 53:17.160]  Appreciate what you do.
[53:17.160 --> 53:18.160]  Alrighty.
[53:18.160 --> 53:19.160]  Okay.
[53:19.160 --> 53:20.160]  Good night.
[53:20.160 --> 53:27.160]  Now we're going to go to Randy in Texas.
[53:27.160 --> 53:28.160]  Hello, Randy.
[53:28.160 --> 53:29.160]  This is Randy.
[53:29.160 --> 53:30.160]  Hi, Randy.
[53:30.160 --> 53:31.160]  Hi, Randy.
[53:31.160 --> 53:34.160]  Okay.
[53:34.160 --> 53:35.160]  We're both Randy.
[53:35.160 --> 53:41.160]  You know, we never told my mother what that meant.
[53:41.160 --> 53:46.160]  Anyway, okay, what do you have for us today?
[53:46.160 --> 53:55.160]  I'm giving you a call about that traffic ticket back in 2010 and, you know, went, bounced,
[53:55.160 --> 53:59.160]  followed it to Mirror because it's up in Oklahoma.
[53:59.160 --> 54:02.160]  And it went round and round and they kept sending me stuff.
[54:02.160 --> 54:04.160]  They wouldn't, they just wouldn't do anything.
[54:04.160 --> 54:07.160]  And they finally just went silent on it.
[54:07.160 --> 54:15.160]  And then about two years ago, went in to get my license renewed and I found out that they
[54:15.160 --> 54:23.160]  had gone to the Texas DPS, I guess, and held a hearing or something like that and had the
[54:23.160 --> 54:29.160]  license suspended, although I never was noticed of anything.
[54:29.160 --> 54:37.160]  And so the other day I got a letter from them or something in the mail and it says traffic
[54:37.160 --> 54:38.160]  docket.
[54:38.160 --> 54:45.160]  And it gives a date and a time and it gives a list of, it says the clerk's name and the
[54:45.160 --> 54:46.160]  judge's name.
[54:46.160 --> 54:48.160]  And then there's a list of people.
[54:48.160 --> 54:56.160]  And I'm on this list and it says pay or appear.
[54:56.160 --> 55:00.160]  And I'm, you know, I'm just like, why in the world am I getting this?
[55:00.160 --> 55:02.160]  It doesn't have a court seal.
[55:02.160 --> 55:03.160]  It has no signature.
[55:03.160 --> 55:07.160]  It doesn't have anything saying what it is.
[55:07.160 --> 55:13.160]  Just a list of basically, I guess, what they want you to think of as a docket and you're
[55:13.160 --> 55:15.160]  supposed to show up.
[55:15.160 --> 55:28.160]  Well, I'm not, I don't have a detailed knowledge of Oklahoma traffic code, but their criminal
[55:28.160 --> 55:34.160]  code is almost certainly going to be very similar to Texas.
[55:34.160 --> 55:41.160]  And the first thing I would want to do is look in Oklahoma law and see what the statute
[55:41.160 --> 55:43.160]  of limitations is.
[55:43.160 --> 55:48.160]  Does Oklahoma law have a speedy trial act?
[55:48.160 --> 55:51.160]  In Texas, it's been struck down.
[55:51.160 --> 55:55.160]  So they act like the right doesn't exist.
[55:55.160 --> 55:59.160]  So the first thing I would want to claim is the right.
[55:59.160 --> 56:05.160]  If there has been a final adjudication in your case, you need to check and see if there
[56:05.160 --> 56:08.160]  was a determination of guilt.
[56:08.160 --> 56:15.160]  If there has been a determination of guilt, the court lacks plenary jurisdiction.
[56:15.160 --> 56:19.160]  They cannot summon you to court.
[56:19.160 --> 56:21.160]  Well, it's not even a summons.
[56:21.160 --> 56:23.160]  It's just a list.
[56:23.160 --> 56:31.160]  Well, it's a notice to appear, so you should treat it as a summons.
[56:31.160 --> 56:35.160]  Well, no, that's what I was intending to do, but I don't think it's a proper summons.
[56:35.160 --> 56:38.160]  I don't think it would meet their legal standards for fun.
[56:38.160 --> 56:39.160]  That's true.
[56:39.160 --> 56:46.160]  But if it walks like a duck and it quacks duck, hold them responsible for it.
[56:46.160 --> 56:51.160]  If it is a summons and it doesn't tell you why you're being summoned, it's insufficient
[56:51.160 --> 56:54.160]  on its face.
[56:54.160 --> 57:01.160]  So the first thing I'd want to do is file a motion for clarification.
[57:01.160 --> 57:12.160]  But contact the court and find out if there has been a determination of guilt in the case.
[57:12.160 --> 57:15.160]  Will the clerk tell me that you think?
[57:15.160 --> 57:17.160]  Yeah, yeah.
[57:17.160 --> 57:21.160]  You tell her it's you, then you have a special interest.
[57:21.160 --> 57:22.160]  Yes, she'll tell you what's in the case.
[57:22.160 --> 57:27.160]  The clerk really doesn't have a dog in this hunt.
[57:27.160 --> 57:32.160]  So they're generally pretty easy to get along with.
[57:32.160 --> 57:33.160]  I think this one does.
[57:33.160 --> 57:34.160]  But yeah.
[57:34.160 --> 57:42.160]  Generally they don't, but that information is public and it may be available online.
[57:42.160 --> 57:45.160]  But call up and find out if there's been a conviction.
[57:45.160 --> 57:49.160]  You said before that you thought there was a conviction in the case.
[57:49.160 --> 57:54.160]  Well, the only reason I think that is because they came to Texas under that, you know, what
[57:54.160 --> 58:01.160]  do you call it, agreements between the states where, you know, if they do one thing...
[58:01.160 --> 58:02.160]  Reciprocity.
[58:02.160 --> 58:03.160]  Yeah.
[58:03.160 --> 58:10.160]  Because, I mean, how could they get them to suspend something if they hadn't done something
[58:10.160 --> 58:11.160]  over there?
[58:11.160 --> 58:16.160]  Well, you still need to make sure of what's going on.
[58:16.160 --> 58:17.160]  Right, okay.
[58:17.160 --> 58:19.160]  They can do anything they want to.
[58:19.160 --> 58:21.160]  They don't care what it is.
[58:21.160 --> 58:24.160]  Well, that's pretty much what I think they've done.
[58:24.160 --> 58:25.160]  I don't think they did anything.
[58:25.160 --> 58:28.160]  I don't even, I doubt if they even had a hearing.
[58:28.160 --> 58:29.160]  Okay, hang on.
[58:29.160 --> 58:30.160]  About to go to break.
[58:30.160 --> 58:33.160]  Randy Kelton, Wheel of Love Radio.
[58:33.160 --> 58:36.160]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[58:36.160 --> 58:37.160]  This is the top of the hour.
[58:37.160 --> 58:42.160]  So it's a good time to go to Logos Radio Network and check out our gun giveaway.
[58:42.160 --> 58:50.160]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.160 --> 58:54.160]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.160 --> 58:59.160]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.160 --> 59:00.160]  can really help.
[59:00.160 --> 59:05.160]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.160 --> 59:06.160]  today.
[59:06.160 --> 59:10.160]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.160 --> 59:13.160]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.160 --> 59:18.160]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.160 --> 59:23.160]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:23.160 --> 59:27.160]  of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.160 --> 59:33.160]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.160 --> 59:40.160]  Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.160 --> 59:45.160]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.160 --> 59:50.160]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.160 --> 01:00:00.160]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.160 --> 01:00:07.160]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[01:00:07.160 --> 01:00:14.160]  bulletins for the commodity market, Today in History, News Updates, and the Inside Scoop
[01:00:14.160 --> 01:00:23.160]  into the Tides of the Alternative.
[01:00:23.160 --> 01:00:28.160]  Markets for Wednesday to 22nd of February 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,237.21
[01:00:28.160 --> 01:00:36.160]  an ounce, silver $18.01 an ounce, Texas crude $53.40 a barrel, and Bitcoin is still rising
[01:00:36.160 --> 01:00:45.160]  sitting at about $1,130 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.160 --> 01:00:51.160]  Today in History, the year 1943, members of the White Rose Resistance, a nonviolent intellectual
[01:00:51.160 --> 01:00:55.160]  resistance group in Nazi Germany led by a group of students and a professor at the University
[01:00:55.160 --> 01:01:00.160]  of Munich that conducted an anonymous leaflet and graffiti campaign which called for active
[01:01:00.160 --> 01:01:06.160]  opposition against the Nazi regime, started on June 27, 1942 and ending with the arrest
[01:01:06.160 --> 01:01:12.160]  of the core group, Sophie Scholl, Hans Scholl, and Christoph Props by the Gustapo on February
[01:01:12.160 --> 01:01:14.160]  18 were executed.
[01:01:14.160 --> 01:01:19.160]  Today in History.
[01:01:19.160 --> 01:01:24.160]  In recent news, the Palestinian Badouin village of Gan Al-Amar near Jerusalem was raided by
[01:01:24.160 --> 01:01:29.160]  Israeli defense forces on Sunday after Israeli's government issued a demolition order for the
[01:01:29.160 --> 01:01:30.160]  Palestinian village.
[01:01:30.160 --> 01:01:34.160]  The IDF imposed a military closure on dozens of structures, homes, and the only school in
[01:01:34.160 --> 01:01:39.160]  the area giving residents just a few days until Thursday of this week to evacuate.
[01:01:39.160 --> 01:01:43.160]  It's estimated that 40 Palestinian homes in the central West Bank community are targeted
[01:01:43.160 --> 01:01:44.160]  for demolition.
[01:01:44.160 --> 01:01:49.160]  In 2014, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs identified
[01:01:49.160 --> 01:01:54.160]  the Gan Al-Amar village as one of the 46 settlements in the area that's at risk of forced relocation
[01:01:54.160 --> 01:01:55.160]  by Israel.
[01:01:55.160 --> 01:01:58.160]  Villagers were given construction termination warrants and will have a chance to present
[01:01:58.160 --> 01:02:00.160]  their case during a hearing on Thursday.
[01:02:00.160 --> 01:02:04.160]  Israeli officials maintain that the village was built illegally in the hotly disputed E1
[01:02:04.160 --> 01:02:14.160]  corridor, which physically links East Jerusalem and the Mali Adumim settlement.
[01:02:14.160 --> 01:02:18.160]  According to the Canadian Border Service Agency, more than 1,400 people have made claims at
[01:02:18.160 --> 01:02:23.160]  land border ports of entry in the region since November, which is more in the last four months
[01:02:23.160 --> 01:02:25.160]  than the entire year of 2015.
[01:02:25.160 --> 01:02:30.160]  Apparently, the number of people seeking asylum has soared in the last year and spiked recently,
[01:02:30.160 --> 01:02:32.160]  with Quebec seeing the greatest numbers.
[01:02:32.160 --> 01:02:36.160]  Canadian authorities are saying that the migrants come from all over the world and ranging in
[01:02:36.160 --> 01:02:39.160]  all ages, from parents with infants to the elderly.
[01:02:39.160 --> 01:02:43.160]  Inspector Martin Roach of the Royal Canadian Mountain Police stated that since, quote,
[01:02:43.160 --> 01:02:47.160]  they're not reporting to the open port of entry, they're being placed under arrest
[01:02:47.160 --> 01:02:50.160]  and then interviewed to make sure there's no national security nexus.
[01:02:50.160 --> 01:03:15.160]  This is Groot Brody with your Lowdown for February 22nd, 2017.
[01:03:15.160 --> 01:03:22.160]  OK, we are back. Randy Kelkin, We Love Radio, and we're talking to Randy in Texas.
[01:03:22.160 --> 01:03:29.160]  OK, Randy, so first thing, check to see if there's a conviction.
[01:03:29.160 --> 01:03:36.160]  If there's not, then your case is too old to prosecute.
[01:03:36.160 --> 01:03:43.160]  And in the meantime, I would file a motion for clarification.
[01:03:43.160 --> 01:03:49.160]  Now, if I file this motion for clarification, I'd have to look at the old paperwork,
[01:03:49.160 --> 01:03:53.160]  but they don't have the special appearance.
[01:03:53.160 --> 01:04:01.160]  They've got some kind of a deal of the old demure type deal going there still.
[01:04:01.160 --> 01:04:04.160]  Demure type deal?
[01:04:04.160 --> 01:04:10.160]  Demure, you know.
[01:04:10.160 --> 01:04:17.160]  And I forget how I had to word it, but it's like when we make a special appearance
[01:04:17.160 --> 01:04:22.160]  through the paperwork to ask them what the heck they're doing.
[01:04:22.160 --> 01:04:25.160]  Did they not respond to it?
[01:04:25.160 --> 01:04:26.160]  I'm sorry?
[01:04:26.160 --> 01:04:29.160]  Did they respond to your demure?
[01:04:29.160 --> 01:04:33.160]  No, not at all. Never.
[01:04:33.160 --> 01:04:40.160]  That's why they just, their response was to call me and send me threatening letters and say,
[01:04:40.160 --> 01:04:42.160]  pay us.
[01:04:42.160 --> 01:04:45.160]  We're going to turn you over to the state of Texas.
[01:04:45.160 --> 01:04:49.160]  I don't know anything about the peculiarities of Oklahoma law,
[01:04:49.160 --> 01:04:53.160]  so I really don't know how to address this for you.
[01:04:53.160 --> 01:04:55.160]  Yeah.
[01:04:55.160 --> 01:04:56.160]  Well, what I was getting at...
[01:04:56.160 --> 01:05:03.160]  Even in judicial conduct, complain them, bar grieve their lawyers, just make their lives miserable.
[01:05:03.160 --> 01:05:05.160]  All right.
[01:05:05.160 --> 01:05:09.160]  Well, I guess what I'll do is I'll just kind of use that same kind of framework
[01:05:09.160 --> 01:05:14.160]  and just state it as a motion for, what is it, clarification.
[01:05:14.160 --> 01:05:16.160]  Clarification.
[01:05:16.160 --> 01:05:22.160]  You're apparently being summoned, but you don't know why you're summoned.
[01:05:22.160 --> 01:05:24.160]  Okay.
[01:05:24.160 --> 01:05:30.160]  And I would assume that that would work as some type of an appearance to some degree.
[01:05:30.160 --> 01:05:32.160]  Absolutely.
[01:05:32.160 --> 01:05:33.160]  Yeah.
[01:05:33.160 --> 01:05:39.160]  Certified letter, and you make appearance by mail.
[01:05:39.160 --> 01:05:40.160]  All right.
[01:05:40.160 --> 01:05:41.160]  I can do that.
[01:05:41.160 --> 01:05:48.160]  And I guess when I talk to her, I guess I can find out, ask, find out.
[01:05:48.160 --> 01:05:51.160]  I guess when I do this, I could go ahead and send them something
[01:05:51.160 --> 01:05:54.160]  saying I want to find out how much, what have they got in their file,
[01:05:54.160 --> 01:05:56.160]  and just get copies of it all.
[01:05:56.160 --> 01:05:57.160]  Yes.
[01:05:57.160 --> 01:06:03.160]  Charge me for it, and then maybe follow up with you,
[01:06:03.160 --> 01:06:05.160]  once you figure out where they really are in this thing.
[01:06:05.160 --> 01:06:08.160]  But I suspect what they did is they just played with it,
[01:06:08.160 --> 01:06:12.160]  and then they just, they may or may not have done a conviction,
[01:06:12.160 --> 01:06:16.160]  just decided to throw it in there, and then they turned around
[01:06:16.160 --> 01:06:19.160]  and went to the administrative court here and said,
[01:06:19.160 --> 01:06:23.160]  oh, he's been bad, he won't pay his ticket.
[01:06:23.160 --> 01:06:35.160]  If they didn't have a conviction there, then you might file a JP suit here,
[01:06:35.160 --> 01:06:39.160]  and let them remove it to the federal court.
[01:06:39.160 --> 01:06:41.160]  Let them do it.
[01:06:41.160 --> 01:06:44.160]  Yeah.
[01:06:44.160 --> 01:06:50.160]  Or hire an attorney down here to answer your suit.
[01:06:50.160 --> 01:06:52.160]  That would be fun.
[01:06:52.160 --> 01:06:53.160]  Yeah, that's interesting.
[01:06:53.160 --> 01:06:56.160]  I was thinking of the federal suit to have them,
[01:06:56.160 --> 01:07:00.160]  force them to come here and answer or hire somebody.
[01:07:00.160 --> 01:07:03.160]  But if you filed a federal suit directly,
[01:07:03.160 --> 01:07:06.160]  then they'd have to hire an attorney here.
[01:07:06.160 --> 01:07:09.160]  Right.
[01:07:09.160 --> 01:07:12.160]  And I guess my damages, are they harassing me?
[01:07:12.160 --> 01:07:13.160]  I don't know.
[01:07:13.160 --> 01:07:18.160]  I don't know if they've filed against your license.
[01:07:18.160 --> 01:07:23.160]  Didn't they deny you a professional license?
[01:07:23.160 --> 01:07:25.160]  Ah, okay.
[01:07:25.160 --> 01:07:28.160]  Even though I don't really need it, still.
[01:07:28.160 --> 01:07:30.160]  You still have a right to it.
[01:07:30.160 --> 01:07:31.160]  You applied for it.
[01:07:31.160 --> 01:07:33.160]  You have the professional license.
[01:07:33.160 --> 01:07:40.160]  Now you can't make a living as an Uber driver.
[01:07:40.160 --> 01:07:43.160]  And I so wanted to do that too.
[01:07:43.160 --> 01:07:48.160]  With your Uber career.
[01:07:48.160 --> 01:07:52.160]  It's now not, it's an Uter career instead of an Uber career now.
[01:07:52.160 --> 01:07:54.160]  It's a what career?
[01:07:54.160 --> 01:07:56.160]  Uter.
[01:07:56.160 --> 01:07:57.160]  Uter, what is it?
[01:07:57.160 --> 01:08:01.160]  Uber is over and Uter is under.
[01:08:01.160 --> 01:08:02.160]  It's lesser.
[01:08:02.160 --> 01:08:05.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:08:05.160 --> 01:08:06.160]  Okay.
[01:08:06.160 --> 01:08:07.160]  Okay, well thanks a lot.
[01:08:07.160 --> 01:08:10.160]  We've got a whole full board, so I'm going to move on.
[01:08:10.160 --> 01:08:11.160]  All right.
[01:08:11.160 --> 01:08:12.160]  Thank you.
[01:08:12.160 --> 01:08:13.160]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:08:13.160 --> 01:08:16.160]  Okay, now we're going to Linda in Texas.
[01:08:16.160 --> 01:08:18.160]  Hello, Linda.
[01:08:18.160 --> 01:08:20.160]  Hello.
[01:08:20.160 --> 01:08:23.160]  I have a processing problem that I can't figure out.
[01:08:23.160 --> 01:08:31.160]  I have a triple wide mobile home, and I sold the home rent to own to this,
[01:08:31.160 --> 01:08:36.160]  the house was already on my land and they're buying just the house.
[01:08:36.160 --> 01:08:40.160]  About a year ago I sold it to them, but since then they won't pay,
[01:08:40.160 --> 01:08:42.160]  and they don't have insurance on it.
[01:08:42.160 --> 01:08:45.160]  And I've talked to them so many times, I've been over with them,
[01:08:45.160 --> 01:08:48.160]  because I'm sick of them, and I want to propose.
[01:08:48.160 --> 01:08:51.160]  Do you have a contract with them?
[01:08:51.160 --> 01:08:56.160]  I do, because whenever I sold it to them, I took it to the attorney,
[01:08:56.160 --> 01:09:00.160]  and we got the contract all drawn out by the attorney,
[01:09:00.160 --> 01:09:02.160]  and he charged, I think it was 850.
[01:09:02.160 --> 01:09:04.160]  Okay, what is the...
[01:09:04.160 --> 01:09:06.160]  I called him and asked him for help,
[01:09:06.160 --> 01:09:09.160]  and he said that he doesn't want to go to court,
[01:09:09.160 --> 01:09:12.160]  and he doesn't want to service his own work.
[01:09:12.160 --> 01:09:13.160]  Don't worry about it.
[01:09:13.160 --> 01:09:15.160]  This is pretty easy.
[01:09:15.160 --> 01:09:23.160]  If you have a contract, you need to give them notice of default,
[01:09:23.160 --> 01:09:30.160]  and give them 60, 90 days, whatever the contract says.
[01:09:30.160 --> 01:09:33.160]  Give them notice and opportunity.
[01:09:33.160 --> 01:09:38.160]  Give them a notice of default and how much they're behind,
[01:09:38.160 --> 01:09:43.160]  and give them, say, 30 days to cure.
[01:09:43.160 --> 01:09:46.160]  And then when they don't cure in 30 days,
[01:09:46.160 --> 01:09:52.160]  then you give them a notice to vacate,
[01:09:52.160 --> 01:09:55.160]  and give them 3 days to vacate.
[01:09:55.160 --> 01:09:58.160]  That's the standard notice to vacate.
[01:09:58.160 --> 01:10:01.160]  And when they ignore the notice to vacate,
[01:10:01.160 --> 01:10:08.160]  then you file an action with the Justice of the Peace Court
[01:10:08.160 --> 01:10:14.160]  asking the court to grant you...
[01:10:14.160 --> 01:10:16.160]  asking the court to order them to...
[01:10:16.160 --> 01:10:17.160]  No, wait a minute.
[01:10:17.160 --> 01:10:19.160]  I'm saying this.
[01:10:19.160 --> 01:10:22.160]  First, you have to foreclose,
[01:10:22.160 --> 01:10:27.160]  and since you've them on contract,
[01:10:27.160 --> 01:10:36.160]  this is a bit difficult because the laws changed in this regard a few years ago.
[01:10:36.160 --> 01:10:38.160]  Two years ago?
[01:10:38.160 --> 01:10:41.160]  Yeah, making it more difficult.
[01:10:41.160 --> 01:10:45.160]  How long ago did you sell this to them on contract?
[01:10:45.160 --> 01:10:47.160]  One year ago.
[01:10:47.160 --> 01:10:49.160]  Okay.
[01:10:49.160 --> 01:10:54.160]  And how long has it been since they paid you?
[01:10:54.160 --> 01:10:56.160]  Well, they've now had insurance on the house,
[01:10:56.160 --> 01:10:58.160]  which is a requirement.
[01:10:58.160 --> 01:11:01.160]  And right now they...
[01:11:01.160 --> 01:11:02.160]  Excuse me.
[01:11:02.160 --> 01:11:07.160]  They owe me about $3,050.
[01:11:07.160 --> 01:11:12.160]  How many months are they behind?
[01:11:12.160 --> 01:11:14.160]  Like three.
[01:11:14.160 --> 01:11:19.160]  Just put a notice to vacate on their door.
[01:11:19.160 --> 01:11:20.160]  Okay.
[01:11:20.160 --> 01:11:23.160]  Three day notice to vacate.
[01:11:23.160 --> 01:11:26.160]  Do I have to call in the whole long?
[01:11:26.160 --> 01:11:27.160]  No, no.
[01:11:27.160 --> 01:11:29.160]  You can't really do that legally.
[01:11:29.160 --> 01:11:31.160]  It doesn't have any legal force in effect,
[01:11:31.160 --> 01:11:36.160]  but it scared a bejesus out of them.
[01:11:36.160 --> 01:11:41.160]  I just had a friend here that a real estate agent did that to him,
[01:11:41.160 --> 01:11:43.160]  and he was just terrified,
[01:11:43.160 --> 01:11:44.160]  and he came to me and said,
[01:11:44.160 --> 01:11:47.160]  I don't want to pay any attention to that.
[01:11:47.160 --> 01:11:49.160]  But he didn't know that.
[01:11:49.160 --> 01:11:53.160]  It may fix your issue.
[01:11:53.160 --> 01:11:57.160]  Before I could say you can do this or you can do that,
[01:11:57.160 --> 01:12:01.160]  I'd have to read the contract because I don't know what the contract says.
[01:12:01.160 --> 01:12:03.160]  Since you had a lawyer make it up,
[01:12:03.160 --> 01:12:05.160]  it probably has provision in there,
[01:12:05.160 --> 01:12:08.160]  but I'd have to see the contract.
[01:12:08.160 --> 01:12:18.160]  And I have someone here that I know who's up to date on rent to purchase.
[01:12:18.160 --> 01:12:22.160]  The problem with rent to purchase is it can get real iffy,
[01:12:22.160 --> 01:12:24.160]  and if you take the property back,
[01:12:24.160 --> 01:12:30.160]  you may have to pay them back everything they paid you.
[01:12:30.160 --> 01:12:33.160]  Well, they've destroyed the house.
[01:12:33.160 --> 01:12:35.160]  It's all messed up.
[01:12:35.160 --> 01:12:40.160]  They also have two really, really junky travel trailers parked on my land,
[01:12:40.160 --> 01:12:43.160]  and they have like three cars that won't start,
[01:12:43.160 --> 01:12:45.160]  and I keep telling them you have to clean up
[01:12:45.160 --> 01:12:48.160]  because the whole property looks like a ghetto,
[01:12:48.160 --> 01:12:52.160]  and they wouldn't pay for their trash pickups,
[01:12:52.160 --> 01:12:56.160]  and there was garbage all over the place.
[01:12:56.160 --> 01:12:57.160]  Okay, there are problems.
[01:12:57.160 --> 01:12:59.160]  I get that part.
[01:12:59.160 --> 01:13:01.160]  But in order to be able to tell you what you can do,
[01:13:01.160 --> 01:13:05.160]  I'd have to see the contract.
[01:13:05.160 --> 01:13:07.160]  You said you know somebody?
[01:13:07.160 --> 01:13:10.160]  Yeah, I know somebody, but I'm in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
[01:13:10.160 --> 01:13:11.160]  I know someone here.
[01:13:11.160 --> 01:13:15.160]  You're 210. That looks like San Antonio area.
[01:13:15.160 --> 01:13:16.160]  Correct.
[01:13:16.160 --> 01:13:24.160]  Okay, so but he can tell you if you will email me a copy of the contract,
[01:13:24.160 --> 01:13:28.160]  I'll look it over and show it to David and see what he says,
[01:13:28.160 --> 01:13:33.160]  and next week I'll have something that you can do.
[01:13:33.160 --> 01:13:34.160]  Okay, awesome.
[01:13:34.160 --> 01:13:35.160]  Thank you so much.
[01:13:35.160 --> 01:13:37.160]  You are welcome.
[01:13:37.160 --> 01:13:40.160]  Okay, now we're going to go to Rodney in Texas.
[01:13:40.160 --> 01:13:42.160]  That'll Rodney.
[01:13:42.160 --> 01:13:44.160]  Randy, how are you doing?
[01:13:44.160 --> 01:13:46.160]  I'm doing good.
[01:13:46.160 --> 01:13:47.160]  All right, all right.
[01:13:47.160 --> 01:13:49.160]  Let me give you an update here.
[01:13:49.160 --> 01:13:51.160]  Last time I spoke with you,
[01:13:51.160 --> 01:13:56.160]  I told you about this attorney, court-appointed attorney.
[01:13:56.160 --> 01:14:00.160]  They had lied to him, basically.
[01:14:00.160 --> 01:14:06.160]  He hasn't fulfilled his obligation to represent my interests.
[01:14:06.160 --> 01:14:11.160]  And so I followed some of your suggestions
[01:14:11.160 --> 01:14:17.160]  and sent some information to the third court of appeal
[01:14:17.160 --> 01:14:20.160]  who has been sending notices to this attorney
[01:14:20.160 --> 01:14:33.160]  asking him to respond to their requests regarding destitute status on myself,
[01:14:33.160 --> 01:14:35.160]  and he hasn't responded.
[01:14:35.160 --> 01:14:41.160]  So what I did is a combination of your suggestion
[01:14:41.160 --> 01:14:44.160]  and some stuff out of jurisdictionary.
[01:14:44.160 --> 01:14:50.160]  I did a judicial notice to the third court of appeal,
[01:14:50.160 --> 01:14:55.160]  basically giving them a timeline on when this attorney was appointed,
[01:14:55.160 --> 01:14:59.160]  what he hasn't done, this, that, and the other,
[01:14:59.160 --> 01:15:02.160]  and asked for a hearing.
[01:15:02.160 --> 01:15:10.160]  I asked, I cited a couple of court cases and...
[01:15:10.160 --> 01:15:15.160]  What did you ask the court to rule?
[01:15:15.160 --> 01:15:21.160]  Sanctions and also a hearing so that I could have this attorney removed
[01:15:21.160 --> 01:15:26.160]  and replaced with hopefully one that's competent.
[01:15:26.160 --> 01:15:31.160]  And they haven't responded, and that's why I was calling to ask you
[01:15:31.160 --> 01:15:34.160]  the last time I spoke with the clerk of the court,
[01:15:34.160 --> 01:15:40.160]  they said that the judicial notice had been sent up to the chambers
[01:15:40.160 --> 01:15:46.160]  and that they were aware of my judicial notice and they were reviewing it.
[01:15:46.160 --> 01:15:51.160]  So since you have years of experience dealing with these people,
[01:15:51.160 --> 01:15:54.160]  what would you say their mindset is
[01:15:54.160 --> 01:15:59.160]  now that they're looking at this judicial notice that I sent to them?
[01:15:59.160 --> 01:16:03.160]  This is what I think is happening.
[01:16:03.160 --> 01:16:06.160]  The judges got your judicial notice and looked at it
[01:16:06.160 --> 01:16:10.160]  and gave it to one of their clerks and said,
[01:16:10.160 --> 01:16:14.160]  call this bozo and get him off the dime
[01:16:14.160 --> 01:16:18.160]  so we don't have to drop the hammer on him.
[01:16:18.160 --> 01:16:22.160]  And the clerk is going to contact the lawyer and tell him,
[01:16:22.160 --> 01:16:27.160]  you better get off the dime or you're going to get the hammer dropped on you.
[01:16:27.160 --> 01:16:31.160]  They're not going to want to issue sanctions against this lawyer
[01:16:31.160 --> 01:16:34.160]  because they protect each other.
[01:16:34.160 --> 01:16:37.160]  But almost certainly they'll contact this lawyer
[01:16:37.160 --> 01:16:40.160]  and get him off the dime, get him busy.
[01:16:40.160 --> 01:16:47.160]  And my suggestion is that you not allow this lawyer to be removed.
[01:16:47.160 --> 01:16:51.160]  If the court appointed him, hang on,
[01:16:51.160 --> 01:16:53.160]  we'll pick this up on the other side, Randy Kelton,
[01:16:53.160 --> 01:17:00.160]  and on the radio, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.160 --> 01:17:01.160]  I love Logos.
[01:17:01.160 --> 01:17:05.160]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:05.160 --> 01:17:07.160]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.160 --> 01:17:08.160]  I need my truth pick.
[01:17:08.160 --> 01:17:10.160]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:17:10.160 --> 01:17:13.160]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.160 --> 01:17:16.160]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:17:16.160 --> 01:17:20.160]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.160 --> 01:17:22.160]  How can I help Logos?
[01:17:22.160 --> 01:17:24.160]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:24.160 --> 01:17:27.160]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos
[01:17:27.160 --> 01:17:29.160]  with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.160 --> 01:17:31.160]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.160 --> 01:17:34.160]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:34.160 --> 01:17:37.160]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:37.160 --> 01:17:41.160]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link,
[01:17:41.160 --> 01:17:43.160]  and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.160 --> 01:17:44.160]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.160 --> 01:17:45.160]  No.
[01:17:45.160 --> 01:17:47.160]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.160 --> 01:17:48.160]  No.
[01:17:48.160 --> 01:17:49.160]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.160 --> 01:17:50.160]  No.
[01:17:50.160 --> 01:17:51.160]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.160 --> 01:17:54.160]  Oh, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.160 --> 01:17:55.160]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.160 --> 01:17:57.160]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.160 --> 01:17:58.160]  You're welcome.
[01:17:58.160 --> 01:18:00.160]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.160 --> 01:18:05.160]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.160 --> 01:18:09.160]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:18:09.160 --> 01:18:13.160]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:18:13.160 --> 01:18:15.160]  and now you can win too.
[01:18:15.160 --> 01:18:19.160]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[01:18:19.160 --> 01:18:21.160]  the federal civil rights statute,
[01:18:21.160 --> 01:18:25.160]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[01:18:25.160 --> 01:18:27.160]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:27.160 --> 01:18:29.160]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:18:29.160 --> 01:18:34.160]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.160 --> 01:18:39.160]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.160 --> 01:18:41.160]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.160 --> 01:18:45.160]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:18:45.160 --> 01:18:47.160]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:18:47.160 --> 01:18:50.160]  or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.160 --> 01:18:52.160]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:18:52.160 --> 01:18:58.160]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:18:58.160 --> 01:19:01.160]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:01.160 --> 01:19:11.160]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.160 --> 01:19:29.160]  Music
[01:19:29.160 --> 01:19:31.160]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:31.160 --> 01:19:33.160]  Randy Hilton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:33.160 --> 01:19:35.160]  We're talking to Rodney Texas.
[01:19:35.160 --> 01:19:39.160]  Rodney got this guy appointed.
[01:19:39.160 --> 01:19:44.160]  And he got paid from the court to do this job.
[01:19:44.160 --> 01:19:48.160]  Now he's got him by the testicles.
[01:19:48.160 --> 01:19:49.160]  Now you sting him.
[01:19:49.160 --> 01:19:53.160]  You haven't bargrieved him yet.
[01:19:53.160 --> 01:20:01.160]  But if the court fails to get him off the dime, then bargrieve him.
[01:20:01.160 --> 01:20:06.160]  When you bargrieve him, he is going to get real excited
[01:20:06.160 --> 01:20:09.160]  because if he's already had a bargrieve,
[01:20:09.160 --> 01:20:12.160]  they'll cancel his malpractice insurance.
[01:20:12.160 --> 01:20:16.160]  If he hasn't, they'll double it.
[01:20:16.160 --> 01:20:20.160]  So this is going to sting him big time.
[01:20:20.160 --> 01:20:22.160]  And then he's going to run to the court
[01:20:22.160 --> 01:20:28.160]  and ask the court to allow him to withdraw from the case.
[01:20:28.160 --> 01:20:30.160]  And you go to the court and tell the court,
[01:20:30.160 --> 01:20:33.160]  don't you dare let him withdraw from this case.
[01:20:33.160 --> 01:20:40.160]  He's my counsel of choice, and he's under contract.
[01:20:40.160 --> 01:20:45.160]  He'll withdraw without your agreement.
[01:20:45.160 --> 01:20:48.160]  I need clarification on something.
[01:20:48.160 --> 01:20:50.160]  Okay.
[01:20:50.160 --> 01:20:56.160]  The third court of appeal, the clerk, one of the clerks told me
[01:20:56.160 --> 01:20:59.160]  that that is, they just make rulings.
[01:20:59.160 --> 01:21:08.160]  They don't have hearings, which is what I requested in my judicial notice.
[01:21:08.160 --> 01:21:11.160]  And so is that true?
[01:21:11.160 --> 01:21:15.160]  This clerk is saying that they only issue rulings.
[01:21:15.160 --> 01:21:17.160]  They don't do hearings.
[01:21:17.160 --> 01:21:20.160]  No, that's not true.
[01:21:20.160 --> 01:21:23.160]  They can issue a mandamus for certain.
[01:21:23.160 --> 01:21:29.160]  If you petition for a mandamus, that'll always be to the court of appeal.
[01:21:29.160 --> 01:21:30.160]  Okay.
[01:21:30.160 --> 01:21:39.160]  Now, my second point of clarification here is I submitted this judicial notice
[01:21:39.160 --> 01:21:41.160]  to the third court of appeal.
[01:21:41.160 --> 01:21:45.160]  Could I also submit that same judicial notice to the district court
[01:21:45.160 --> 01:21:49.160]  where this attorney was appointed?
[01:21:49.160 --> 01:21:52.160]  It depends.
[01:21:52.160 --> 01:21:58.160]  Do you have a final adjudication in the trial court?
[01:21:58.160 --> 01:22:01.160]  No, it's still open and pending.
[01:22:01.160 --> 01:22:05.160]  Then the trial court still has plenary jurisdiction.
[01:22:05.160 --> 01:22:06.160]  Yes.
[01:22:06.160 --> 01:22:10.160]  If you had a final decision and you were appealing a final decision,
[01:22:10.160 --> 01:22:15.160]  then the trial court would have no jurisdiction at all.
[01:22:15.160 --> 01:22:19.160]  But if there's not a final determination, then the trial court still has
[01:22:19.160 --> 01:22:23.160]  plenary jurisdiction absolutely you can file in the trial court.
[01:22:23.160 --> 01:22:24.160]  Okay.
[01:22:24.160 --> 01:22:33.160]  But take a step back and consider the human factor and the politics for a moment.
[01:22:33.160 --> 01:22:36.160]  All of these guys, they want life to be easy.
[01:22:36.160 --> 01:22:38.160]  They want things to go well.
[01:22:38.160 --> 01:22:42.160]  All these lawyers and judges all know each other.
[01:22:42.160 --> 01:22:47.160]  And the judges are not going to want this lawyer to get sanctioned
[01:22:47.160 --> 01:22:51.160]  or to have this kind of problem because it makes them all look bad.
[01:22:51.160 --> 01:22:59.160]  And the judges are kind of the mentors of the lawyers.
[01:22:59.160 --> 01:23:07.160]  If you talk to Harmon Taylor, he considers opinions by judges as instruction.
[01:23:07.160 --> 01:23:12.160]  They're always instructing the lawyers on how to correct their pleadings
[01:23:12.160 --> 01:23:14.160]  or how to file their pleadings.
[01:23:14.160 --> 01:23:18.160]  So the judges tend to be mentors for the lawyers.
[01:23:18.160 --> 01:23:22.160]  So they don't want to go down there and beat up this lawyer and ruin his career.
[01:23:22.160 --> 01:23:28.160]  So when you file this document, even if it's wrong and they don't have any authority,
[01:23:28.160 --> 01:23:32.160]  they're going to get someone to get in touch with this guy and say,
[01:23:32.160 --> 01:23:39.160]  hey, look, your client is trying to get us to kick your beehive.
[01:23:39.160 --> 01:23:43.160]  Now, we can't kick your beehive, but he's going to find somebody that can
[01:23:43.160 --> 01:23:47.160]  if you don't get off the dime.
[01:23:47.160 --> 01:23:53.160]  Well, I filed this condition notice two weeks ago and I haven't heard any response.
[01:23:53.160 --> 01:23:57.160]  It's time to bar grieving.
[01:23:57.160 --> 01:23:58.160]  Now, that's the other thing.
[01:23:58.160 --> 01:24:04.160]  I went down to the Texas bar to get some bar grievance forms.
[01:24:04.160 --> 01:24:08.160]  And there were three other people standing there arguing with these people.
[01:24:08.160 --> 01:24:12.160]  They were like, look, I sent in my bar grievance on this attorney,
[01:24:12.160 --> 01:24:15.160]  not the one that I'm dealing with.
[01:24:15.160 --> 01:24:22.160]  But they sent them in certified return receipt and they were saying,
[01:24:22.160 --> 01:24:27.160]  I haven't heard anything back regarding this matter.
[01:24:27.160 --> 01:24:31.160]  And a couple of guys go, I even faxed it to the bar
[01:24:31.160 --> 01:24:38.160]  and didn't hear anything back about the attorney that they bar grievance.
[01:24:38.160 --> 01:24:46.160]  So my question to you is, they have an online form where you can file a bargain.
[01:24:46.160 --> 01:24:48.160]  Which one is better?
[01:24:48.160 --> 01:24:50.160]  And I know this might sound silly, but I'm going to ask you,
[01:24:50.160 --> 01:24:57.160]  which one is better to file the paper bar grievance or the one that's online?
[01:24:57.160 --> 01:25:02.160]  And how do the insurance companies know when these attorneys have been bar
[01:25:02.160 --> 01:25:07.160]  grievance, if these people are losing paperwork over there at the Texas bar,
[01:25:07.160 --> 01:25:11.160]  they're losing paperwork and people are standing there arguing with them,
[01:25:11.160 --> 01:25:14.160]  wondering how come they haven't heard anything back from them regarding
[01:25:14.160 --> 01:25:17.160]  that grievance that they filed against their attorneys?
[01:25:17.160 --> 01:25:19.160]  Okay.
[01:25:19.160 --> 01:25:26.160]  The lawyer is required to give notice of the bar grievance.
[01:25:26.160 --> 01:25:30.160]  If the state bar is blocking grievances,
[01:25:30.160 --> 01:25:37.160]  one thing to know is that the state bar is up for sunset at the next session.
[01:25:37.160 --> 01:25:39.160]  Okay. All right.
[01:25:39.160 --> 01:25:43.160]  We need to find all these complaints we can.
[01:25:43.160 --> 01:25:48.160]  But what you might do is never use the online form.
[01:25:48.160 --> 01:25:56.160]  If you want, I have a PDF fill-in-the-blanks form I can send you.
[01:25:56.160 --> 01:26:01.160]  And it has instructions in there.
[01:26:01.160 --> 01:26:02.160]  Don't give them this information.
[01:26:02.160 --> 01:26:04.160]  It's none of their business.
[01:26:04.160 --> 01:26:08.160]  It kind of instructs you on how to fill it out.
[01:26:08.160 --> 01:26:12.160]  And those instructions don't print when you print it.
[01:26:12.160 --> 01:26:14.160]  Okay.
[01:26:14.160 --> 01:26:19.160]  Then you send the lawyer one and send the bar one.
[01:26:19.160 --> 01:26:24.160]  Now you know the lawyer has notice.
[01:26:24.160 --> 01:26:31.160]  Once the lawyer has notice, he has a duty to notice his insurance company.
[01:26:31.160 --> 01:26:38.160]  If he doesn't and you sue him, he's not insured.
[01:26:38.160 --> 01:26:41.160]  That's the problem for the lawyer.
[01:26:41.160 --> 01:26:49.160]  And if you do a search for when a lawyer must notice his malpractice carrier,
[01:26:49.160 --> 01:26:53.160]  you will be surprised at what you will find.
[01:26:53.160 --> 01:26:58.160]  I found a document when I did that, I think it was the second hit,
[01:26:58.160 --> 01:27:05.160]  that said that lawyers have to notify their insurance carrier
[01:27:05.160 --> 01:27:12.160]  if there is any possibility they will be sued.
[01:27:12.160 --> 01:27:13.160]  No matter what it is.
[01:27:13.160 --> 01:27:16.160]  Because if they get sued, the first thing the insurance company is going to do
[01:27:16.160 --> 01:27:21.160]  is try to get out from under the liability.
[01:27:21.160 --> 01:27:23.160]  And they're going to go to that lawyer and say,
[01:27:23.160 --> 01:27:27.160]  did you have any idea that you could be sued for this?
[01:27:27.160 --> 01:27:30.160]  If he hasn't already notified him, if he gets a bar grievance
[01:27:30.160 --> 01:27:35.160]  and he doesn't notify him and you sue him, he doesn't have any insurance.
[01:27:35.160 --> 01:27:40.160]  You get to come for him personally.
[01:27:40.160 --> 01:27:41.160]  I've got a question.
[01:27:41.160 --> 01:27:45.160]  When I follow this judicial notice with the district court,
[01:27:45.160 --> 01:27:49.160]  can I attach a copy of the bar grievance to it?
[01:27:49.160 --> 01:27:52.160]  I wouldn't do that.
[01:27:52.160 --> 01:27:56.160]  This is none of their business.
[01:27:56.160 --> 01:27:57.160]  They can't speak to it.
[01:27:57.160 --> 01:28:02.160]  And the court will feel like you're trying to unduly influence them.
[01:28:02.160 --> 01:28:06.160]  What you filed with them was perfect.
[01:28:06.160 --> 01:28:12.160]  You're asking them to do something they probably can't do.
[01:28:12.160 --> 01:28:14.160]  Who cares?
[01:28:14.160 --> 01:28:18.160]  You give them notice of what's going on with this lawyer.
[01:28:18.160 --> 01:28:21.160]  And they will almost certainly contact the lawyer.
[01:28:21.160 --> 01:28:25.160]  But file a bar grievance and send one to the lawyer.
[01:28:25.160 --> 01:28:27.160]  I'll do that.
[01:28:27.160 --> 01:28:30.160]  Just one thing I want to agree with you on.
[01:28:30.160 --> 01:28:35.160]  These judges, like you said, they feel like they're mentors to these attorneys.
[01:28:35.160 --> 01:28:42.160]  So the odd man out, it seems, and I'm speaking for this personally,
[01:28:42.160 --> 01:28:48.160]  they seem like they'd rather throw the client under the bus
[01:28:48.160 --> 01:28:52.160]  than throw the attorney under the bus.
[01:28:52.160 --> 01:28:56.160]  And that's what has happened in my situation.
[01:28:56.160 --> 01:29:04.160]  This attorney has went out of his way to undermine my right to due process.
[01:29:04.160 --> 01:29:14.160]  Okay, so you go out of your way to undermine his ability to practice his profession.
[01:29:14.160 --> 01:29:20.160]  You have some serious power concerning his bar card.
[01:29:20.160 --> 01:29:26.160]  And when you start getting judges upset,
[01:29:26.160 --> 01:29:31.160]  when they get upset at you, they can't tell you they're upset with you.
[01:29:31.160 --> 01:29:34.160]  They can tell your lawyer they're upset.
[01:29:34.160 --> 01:29:37.160]  They can't do anything to retaliate against you.
[01:29:37.160 --> 01:29:40.160]  They can retaliate against that lawyer.
[01:29:40.160 --> 01:29:44.160]  He is absolutely vulnerable.
[01:29:44.160 --> 01:29:46.160]  Hang on, about to go to break.
[01:29:46.160 --> 01:29:53.160]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:53.160 --> 01:30:02.160]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.160 --> 01:30:07.160]  Radio frequency microchips are often used to track products as they make their way to stores.
[01:30:07.160 --> 01:30:09.160]  But would you want them in your socks?
[01:30:09.160 --> 01:30:17.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you about the bizarre privacy-invasive new product called Smart Socks, next.
[01:30:17.160 --> 01:30:19.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:19.160 --> 01:30:22.160]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.160 --> 01:30:27.160]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.160 --> 01:30:29.160]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:29.160 --> 01:30:33.160]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:33.160 --> 01:30:35.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.160 --> 01:30:38.160]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.160 --> 01:30:42.160]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.160 --> 01:30:46.160]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.160 --> 01:30:54.160]  Black Socks, a maker of men's dress socks, is embedding its products with radio frequency microchips or RFID technology.
[01:30:54.160 --> 01:30:58.160]  When scanned, each so-called smart sock transmits a unique ID number.
[01:30:58.160 --> 01:31:03.160]  The technology helps customers keep track of how many times their socks have been washed,
[01:31:03.160 --> 01:31:07.160]  how black their socks are, and which socks should be paired together.
[01:31:07.160 --> 01:31:08.160]  The cost?
[01:31:08.160 --> 01:31:14.160]  $189 for a 10-pack, a scanner, and yes, an iPhone app.
[01:31:14.160 --> 01:31:17.160]  Spy-chip socks may make for scientific sorting,
[01:31:17.160 --> 01:31:21.160]  but if you wear them, the floor itself could eventually track you.
[01:31:21.160 --> 01:31:24.160]  To me, that doesn't sound smart, it sounds spooky.
[01:31:24.160 --> 01:31:31.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.160 --> 01:31:37.160]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.160 --> 01:31:39.160]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.160 --> 01:31:43.160]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.160 --> 01:31:46.160]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.160 --> 01:31:49.160]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:49.160 --> 01:31:50.160]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.160 --> 01:31:51.160]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.160 --> 01:31:53.160]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:54.160]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.160 --> 01:31:55.160]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.160 --> 01:31:58.160]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.160 --> 01:32:01.160]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.160 --> 01:32:03.160]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.160 --> 01:32:06.160]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.160 --> 01:32:09.160]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim trails,
[01:32:09.160 --> 01:32:11.160]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.160 --> 01:32:15.160]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.160 --> 01:32:16.160]  That's why you have insurance,
[01:32:16.160 --> 01:32:19.160]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:19.160 --> 01:32:21.160]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.160 --> 01:32:27.160]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.160 --> 01:32:32.160]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.160 --> 01:32:39.160]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.160 --> 01:32:41.160]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.160 --> 01:32:46.160]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.160 --> 01:32:51.160]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.160 --> 01:32:57.160]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.160 --> 01:32:59.160]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.160 --> 01:33:03.160]  May not actually be kidding about Kim trails.
[01:33:03.160 --> 01:33:05.160]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:05.160 --> 01:33:09.160]  You found it, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:28.160 --> 01:33:30.160]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:30.160 --> 01:33:35.160]  I'm Randy Kelton from the Root of Love Radio, and we're talking to Rodney in Texas.
[01:33:35.160 --> 01:33:41.160]  But yeah, bar grievance is probably the most powerful tool you've got right now.
[01:33:41.160 --> 01:33:46.160]  Well, so my final thing that I've gotten out of your suggestions is number one,
[01:33:46.160 --> 01:33:48.160]  don't let this guy off the hook.
[01:33:48.160 --> 01:33:50.160]  Don't let him remove himself.
[01:33:50.160 --> 01:33:54.160]  And number two, don't get mad, get even.
[01:33:54.160 --> 01:33:55.160]  Exactly.
[01:33:55.160 --> 01:33:57.160]  Yeah, you let this guy off the hook.
[01:33:57.160 --> 01:34:03.160]  They're going to appoint another attorney, and he's going to do the same garbage.
[01:34:03.160 --> 01:34:08.160]  Then you'll wind up down the road in the same position or a worse position,
[01:34:08.160 --> 01:34:11.160]  because your time is running.
[01:34:11.160 --> 01:34:18.160]  But if you can sting this guy real good, you might even send him a tort letter.
[01:34:18.160 --> 01:34:24.160]  Did you notice an attempt to sue for malpractice?
[01:34:24.160 --> 01:34:26.160]  Wow, okay.
[01:34:26.160 --> 01:34:31.160]  That's like to get him off the dime.
[01:34:31.160 --> 01:34:33.160]  Okay.
[01:34:33.160 --> 01:34:38.160]  How would a letter like a very simplified version of a tort letter,
[01:34:38.160 --> 01:34:43.160]  can you give me an overview of a simplified version of a tort letter?
[01:34:43.160 --> 01:34:48.160]  Well, I just made up a tort letter for a woman in California.
[01:34:48.160 --> 01:34:54.160]  And what the tort letter consisted of was a lawsuit.
[01:34:54.160 --> 01:35:01.160]  This was against a tax assessor who had been assessing on the order of 10 times
[01:35:01.160 --> 01:35:09.160]  the value against the property as opposed to its actual value.
[01:35:09.160 --> 01:35:13.160]  And I wrote up the lawsuit to sue them for it.
[01:35:13.160 --> 01:35:17.160]  And then I took the heading off of it and put a letter heading on it.
[01:35:17.160 --> 01:35:25.160]  I took the prayer off the bottom and put a make me whole to be sued.
[01:35:25.160 --> 01:35:30.160]  And then put in the amount I wanted them to send to make us whole.
[01:35:30.160 --> 01:35:38.160]  So all a tort letter is is notice and opportunity to cure.
[01:35:38.160 --> 01:35:44.160]  So notice of harm and opportunity to cure.
[01:35:44.160 --> 01:35:52.160]  Figure out some way of monetizing a claim.
[01:35:52.160 --> 01:35:55.160]  I don't know what the nature of your suit is,
[01:35:55.160 --> 01:36:00.160]  but I get the impression it's not about money, it's about other things.
[01:36:00.160 --> 01:36:10.160]  So figure out a way to claim a dollar amount.
[01:36:10.160 --> 01:36:15.160]  And ask him, make it a big dollar amount.
[01:36:15.160 --> 01:36:22.160]  And ask him for this amount from him or be sued for malpractice.
[01:36:22.160 --> 01:36:27.160]  And he's immediately going to try to get the judge to let him withdraw.
[01:36:27.160 --> 01:36:30.160]  You object to that.
[01:36:30.160 --> 01:36:32.160]  You're under contract.
[01:36:32.160 --> 01:36:40.160]  You accepted payment for the contract, now perform.
[01:36:40.160 --> 01:36:41.160]  Okay.
[01:36:41.160 --> 01:36:46.160]  And so I would follow that tort with the same district court, wouldn't I?
[01:36:46.160 --> 01:36:48.160]  I know that sounds...
[01:36:48.160 --> 01:36:49.160]  No, no.
[01:36:49.160 --> 01:36:53.160]  The tort letter goes to the lawyer.
[01:36:53.160 --> 01:36:56.160]  That's only between you and the lawyer.
[01:36:56.160 --> 01:36:58.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:36:58.160 --> 01:37:02.160]  You're giving him notice.
[01:37:02.160 --> 01:37:08.160]  And if he wants to go show it to the court, let him.
[01:37:08.160 --> 01:37:09.160]  I got you.
[01:37:09.160 --> 01:37:14.160]  That'll also let the court know that you mean business
[01:37:14.160 --> 01:37:19.160]  and that you're willing to throw your lawyer under the bus.
[01:37:19.160 --> 01:37:23.160]  And you're aware that he was trying to throw you under the bus.
[01:37:23.160 --> 01:37:28.160]  So good luck with how this works out for you.
[01:37:28.160 --> 01:37:31.160]  Randy, thank you so much.
[01:37:31.160 --> 01:37:34.160]  This has actually been very, very helpful.
[01:37:34.160 --> 01:37:42.160]  And particularly just getting the psychological mindset of these judges and attorneys.
[01:37:42.160 --> 01:37:51.160]  That's something that, you know, school and things like that really can't teach you.
[01:37:51.160 --> 01:37:56.160]  You have to actually be there and you've got all that experience.
[01:37:56.160 --> 01:37:58.160]  So I appreciate you sharing it with me.
[01:37:58.160 --> 01:38:03.160]  That is the most powerful understanding you can have.
[01:38:03.160 --> 01:38:10.160]  You know, it took me quite a while to get over being angry at the judges and the lawyers.
[01:38:10.160 --> 01:38:18.160]  And once I started treating them as human beings, and these lawyers get out of law school
[01:38:18.160 --> 01:38:23.160]  and they begin the practice of law, and one of the things I keep saying,
[01:38:23.160 --> 01:38:32.160]  I don't think there's a single lawyer who spent six years in law school and $150,000 to $180,000
[01:38:32.160 --> 01:38:37.160]  so that he could get out of law school and spend the rest of his professional career
[01:38:37.160 --> 01:38:41.160]  kissing some arrogant judges behind.
[01:38:41.160 --> 01:38:46.160]  But that's how it winds up out here in the real world.
[01:38:46.160 --> 01:38:50.160]  Lawyers are terrified of everybody.
[01:38:50.160 --> 01:38:54.160]  And I have seen it. I've seen it, man.
[01:38:54.160 --> 01:39:03.160]  I've seen two lawyers who work for large law firms and one would think that they have pretty nice salaries.
[01:39:03.160 --> 01:39:12.160]  I've been in their offices, they're very plush offices in downtown Austin.
[01:39:12.160 --> 01:39:16.160]  But when they go into the courtroom and they go before these judges,
[01:39:16.160 --> 01:39:21.160]  you ought to see how these guys grovel to the lawyer and they're like,
[01:39:21.160 --> 01:39:25.160]  oh, I don't want to get sideways with you, Judge, so and so and so.
[01:39:25.160 --> 01:39:28.160]  And I mean, it is pretty sickening.
[01:39:28.160 --> 01:39:30.160]  Well, they have to.
[01:39:30.160 --> 01:39:32.160]  Pretty sickening.
[01:39:32.160 --> 01:39:37.160]  These judges, the judge can sanction this lawyer at the drop of a hat.
[01:39:37.160 --> 01:39:46.160]  If he does anything to annoy the judge, the judge can screw his next client to get back at him.
[01:39:46.160 --> 01:39:50.160]  You know, I mentioned this $11 million lawsuit earlier.
[01:39:50.160 --> 01:39:55.160]  I filed this thing and then I started calling lawyers.
[01:39:55.160 --> 01:39:59.160]  And I did this purposely. I called lawyers all over Denton County.
[01:39:59.160 --> 01:40:06.160]  I really wanted to tell them what the lawsuit was so we'd get around to everybody knowing about it.
[01:40:06.160 --> 01:40:14.160]  The last lawyer I called was the prior district attorney before the current one.
[01:40:14.160 --> 01:40:18.160]  And I had sued the current district attorney.
[01:40:18.160 --> 01:40:20.160]  So this guy's name was Jerry Cobb.
[01:40:20.160 --> 01:40:25.160]  And I said, hello, Jerry, my name is Randy Kelton and I have sued Denton County.
[01:40:25.160 --> 01:40:27.160]  And I need a lawyer to represent my suit.
[01:40:27.160 --> 01:40:30.160]  Oh, I know all about your suit, Mr. Kelton.
[01:40:30.160 --> 01:40:32.160]  I can't represent you.
[01:40:32.160 --> 01:40:34.160]  You made allegations against judges in there.
[01:40:34.160 --> 01:40:37.160]  I have to represent clients in this county.
[01:40:37.160 --> 01:40:40.160]  I said, what's the matter, Jerry?
[01:40:40.160 --> 01:40:45.160]  You afraid those judges will screw your next client to get back at me?
[01:40:45.160 --> 01:40:50.160]  And he said the same thing every other lawyer did.
[01:40:50.160 --> 01:40:54.160]  You darn right they will.
[01:40:54.160 --> 01:40:58.160]  Now, I don't know if that's true or not.
[01:40:58.160 --> 01:41:03.160]  But I do know that those lawyers think it's true.
[01:41:03.160 --> 01:41:08.160]  And they're not going to do anything to get that judge upset with them.
[01:41:08.160 --> 01:41:10.160]  It would be unethical.
[01:41:10.160 --> 01:41:14.160]  Because if they make the judge mad at them on your case,
[01:41:14.160 --> 01:41:16.160]  then they bring their next client to them.
[01:41:16.160 --> 01:41:21.160]  And the next client, if it's a matter of the discretion of the judge,
[01:41:21.160 --> 01:41:25.160]  the judge is going to screw their client to get back at them.
[01:41:25.160 --> 01:41:28.160]  So they're in a spot.
[01:41:28.160 --> 01:41:30.160]  What do they do?
[01:41:30.160 --> 01:41:33.160]  What you're saying is so true.
[01:41:33.160 --> 01:41:37.160]  This lawyer even falsified information.
[01:41:37.160 --> 01:41:42.160]  He left out very, very vital information regarding the ruling from a judge.
[01:41:42.160 --> 01:41:44.160]  And he did it intentionally.
[01:41:44.160 --> 01:41:50.160]  But he did it to shield for that judge because, again, he's afraid of him.
[01:41:50.160 --> 01:41:54.160]  And I tried to get another attorney to step in.
[01:41:54.160 --> 01:41:59.160]  But that attorney said exactly what you just said, Mr. Cobb said.
[01:41:59.160 --> 01:42:03.160]  You're trying to go after the judge.
[01:42:03.160 --> 01:42:08.160]  I'm not going to represent you if you're going to do that.
[01:42:08.160 --> 01:42:15.160]  And he had an ethical duty to his other clients.
[01:42:15.160 --> 01:42:26.160]  So what we need to do is give the lawyer the opportunity to actually be a lawyer.
[01:42:26.160 --> 01:42:32.160]  And the way we do that is we give our lawyer plausible deniability.
[01:42:32.160 --> 01:42:36.160]  Once he can go to the judge and say,
[01:42:36.160 --> 01:42:40.160]  oh, you know the client that just filed a judicial conduct complaint against you?
[01:42:40.160 --> 01:42:41.160]  Yeah, yeah, that one.
[01:42:41.160 --> 01:42:44.160]  That's the one that filed a bar grievance against me.
[01:42:44.160 --> 01:42:47.160]  Now, I got to come in here and adjudicate his case,
[01:42:47.160 --> 01:42:52.160]  and he's going to kick both our behinds.
[01:42:52.160 --> 01:42:55.160]  Plausible deniability.
[01:42:55.160 --> 01:42:59.160]  Once he has it, my last case in Austin,
[01:42:59.160 --> 01:43:07.160]  the judge dismissed the case to protect my lawyer from me.
[01:43:07.160 --> 01:43:13.160]  And there was a static first case he ever won.
[01:43:13.160 --> 01:43:16.160]  He'd just been a lawyer for about a year.
[01:43:16.160 --> 01:43:20.160]  And he was court appointed counsel.
[01:43:20.160 --> 01:43:23.160]  That's what they do when they don't get picked up by law firm.
[01:43:23.160 --> 01:43:25.160]  So he's struggling.
[01:43:25.160 --> 01:43:30.160]  And he's taking these clients and screwing one client after the other.
[01:43:30.160 --> 01:43:32.160]  Keep the court happy with it.
[01:43:32.160 --> 01:43:34.160]  And then he gets me.
[01:43:34.160 --> 01:43:40.160]  And he told me 20 times if he told me once that I was going to get him disbarred.
[01:43:40.160 --> 01:43:42.160]  I didn't care.
[01:43:42.160 --> 01:43:46.160]  And the judge dismissed the case to protect him from me.
[01:43:46.160 --> 01:43:49.160]  But this was the first time he got to win.
[01:43:49.160 --> 01:43:54.160]  So I can't blame the lawyers as much as we'd like to.
[01:43:54.160 --> 01:43:55.160]  Hang on.
[01:43:55.160 --> 01:43:57.160]  We'll blame them on the other side.
[01:43:57.160 --> 01:44:20.160]  Randy Calhoun, The Lawyer with Good News.
[01:44:27.160 --> 01:44:30.160]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.160 --> 01:44:33.160]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.160 --> 01:44:36.160]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:44:36.160 --> 01:44:39.160]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.160 --> 01:44:43.160]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein,
[01:44:43.160 --> 01:44:48.160]  is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.160 --> 01:44:54.160]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:44:54.160 --> 01:44:57.160]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:44:57.160 --> 01:45:02.160]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[01:45:02.160 --> 01:45:05.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:05.160 --> 01:45:08.160]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.160 --> 01:45:12.160]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:12.160 --> 01:45:16.160]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:16.160 --> 01:45:20.160]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.160 --> 01:45:23.160]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.160 --> 01:45:26.160]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course,
[01:45:26.160 --> 01:45:28.160]  and now you can too.
[01:45:28.160 --> 01:45:31.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.160 --> 01:45:34.160]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.160 --> 01:45:39.160]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.160 --> 01:45:43.160]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.160 --> 01:45:48.160]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.160 --> 01:45:52.160]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.160 --> 01:45:56.160]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.160 --> 01:46:01.160]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.160 --> 01:46:29.160]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:29.160 --> 01:46:35.160]  Randy Kelcom, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Rodney in Texas.
[01:46:35.160 --> 01:46:43.160]  Yeah, it gets a lot easier when you stop pointing fingers at people, blaming people.
[01:46:43.160 --> 01:46:46.160]  You know, Rodney, I'm not particularly religious,
[01:46:46.160 --> 01:46:50.160]  but I find the Bible to be a book of great wisdom.
[01:46:50.160 --> 01:46:54.160]  And when it says, judge not that ye be not judged,
[01:46:54.160 --> 01:46:59.160]  from my perspective, it has nothing to do with religion.
[01:46:59.160 --> 01:47:03.160]  It has to do with what works well.
[01:47:03.160 --> 01:47:08.160]  When I stopped blaming the lawyers for being dirty rotten scoundrels,
[01:47:08.160 --> 01:47:16.160]  I started looking back at the forces that were acting on them.
[01:47:16.160 --> 01:47:19.160]  Then I began to understand what was going on.
[01:47:19.160 --> 01:47:22.160]  Once I understood what was going on,
[01:47:22.160 --> 01:47:27.160]  then I knew what their weaknesses were.
[01:47:27.160 --> 01:47:28.160]  So...
[01:47:28.160 --> 01:47:32.160]  I have one term I want you to clarify for me,
[01:47:32.160 --> 01:47:36.160]  and hopefully it's one that I heard in the jurisdictionary course
[01:47:36.160 --> 01:47:40.160]  called equitable something equitable.
[01:47:40.160 --> 01:47:42.160]  Equitable a stopper?
[01:47:42.160 --> 01:47:50.160]  Yeah, where the judge, the court is able to rectify,
[01:47:50.160 --> 01:47:55.160]  I guess, an injustice.
[01:47:55.160 --> 01:48:01.160]  Well, equity is what's right.
[01:48:01.160 --> 01:48:04.160]  In equity, generally equity refers to money,
[01:48:04.160 --> 01:48:13.160]  but it also refers to balance of values.
[01:48:13.160 --> 01:48:21.160]  So if something is causing an unjust outcome,
[01:48:21.160 --> 01:48:26.160]  then the judge can construe it as going to equity.
[01:48:26.160 --> 01:48:36.160]  And if a certain action would lead to unjust imbalance,
[01:48:36.160 --> 01:48:40.160]  he can invoke equitable a stopper
[01:48:40.160 --> 01:48:47.160]  and stop that from happening because it's not equitable.
[01:48:47.160 --> 01:48:52.160]  That's the context that the jurisdictionary course is talking about.
[01:48:52.160 --> 01:48:59.160]  In situations where there's clear injustice about to be carried out
[01:48:59.160 --> 01:49:01.160]  on the part of the court,
[01:49:01.160 --> 01:49:08.160]  or in this case an incompetent attorney didn't do their job,
[01:49:08.160 --> 01:49:14.160]  the court has the power to intervene in this equitable adjustment,
[01:49:14.160 --> 01:49:18.160]  equitable a stopper.
[01:49:18.160 --> 01:49:23.160]  So I guess I'm bringing that up to ask,
[01:49:23.160 --> 01:49:27.160]  how would I look for cases along that line
[01:49:27.160 --> 01:49:34.160]  where the courses have used equitable a stopper to balance
[01:49:34.160 --> 01:49:38.160]  that wrong right?
[01:49:38.160 --> 01:49:43.160]  Just go on the internet and do a search for cases in equity
[01:49:43.160 --> 01:49:50.160]  or word it in a way that makes sense to you
[01:49:50.160 --> 01:49:53.160]  and just stick it on the internet.
[01:49:53.160 --> 01:49:58.160]  You know, I don't use Westlaw lexis anymore.
[01:49:58.160 --> 01:50:03.160]  I find the internet much more valuable.
[01:50:03.160 --> 01:50:07.160]  The reason being is you have all these lawyers.
[01:50:07.160 --> 01:50:12.160]  Most of the lawyers now, as opposed to 30, 40 years ago,
[01:50:12.160 --> 01:50:15.160]  lawyers used to be general practitioners.
[01:50:15.160 --> 01:50:21.160]  Now everybody pretty well focuses in really small areas.
[01:50:21.160 --> 01:50:24.160]  So this lawyer is good at one thing
[01:50:24.160 --> 01:50:28.160]  and he wants other lawyers to know he's good at that thing.
[01:50:28.160 --> 01:50:34.160]  So he will put essays and treatises on the internet
[01:50:34.160 --> 01:50:36.160]  so that other lawyers can find them
[01:50:36.160 --> 01:50:40.160]  if they have a case that deals with this issue.
[01:50:40.160 --> 01:50:44.160]  They want the other lawyer to find his treatment on the issue
[01:50:44.160 --> 01:50:47.160]  so that they will hire him, you know,
[01:50:47.160 --> 01:50:51.160]  bring him on to represent this area for their clients.
[01:50:51.160 --> 01:50:54.160]  Because generally lawyers get 50% of their business
[01:50:54.160 --> 01:50:57.160]  from referrals from other lawyers.
[01:50:57.160 --> 01:50:59.160]  They put them on the internet.
[01:50:59.160 --> 01:51:01.160]  So when we go on the internet,
[01:51:01.160 --> 01:51:07.160]  we can find excellent treatments on most anything you can think of.
[01:51:07.160 --> 01:51:12.160]  Let me look at equitable...
[01:51:12.160 --> 01:51:18.160]  I put estoppel.
[01:51:18.160 --> 01:51:23.160]  Equitable estoppel.
[01:51:23.160 --> 01:51:30.160]  Okay, equitable estoppel, definition of equitable estoppel.
[01:51:30.160 --> 01:51:35.160]  Okay, a legal principle that bars a party from denying
[01:51:35.160 --> 01:51:38.160]  or alleging a certain fact,
[01:51:38.160 --> 01:51:43.160]  owing to that party's previous conduct alleging allegation or denial.
[01:51:43.160 --> 01:51:45.160]  That's why I wanted to look that up,
[01:51:45.160 --> 01:51:48.160]  because we're going to equity,
[01:51:48.160 --> 01:51:52.160]  but we're not going to equitable estoppel.
[01:51:52.160 --> 01:51:54.160]  Right.
[01:51:54.160 --> 01:52:07.160]  Let's look up, say, just equity.
[01:52:07.160 --> 01:52:14.160]  Okay, equity, definition, estoppel.
[01:52:14.160 --> 01:52:16.160]  Breaking down equity.
[01:52:16.160 --> 01:52:19.160]  Generally speaking, the definition of equity
[01:52:19.160 --> 01:52:25.160]  can be represented with the accounting equation,
[01:52:25.160 --> 01:52:31.160]  equity equals assets minus liabilities.
[01:52:31.160 --> 01:52:34.160]  That's not going to help us much.
[01:52:34.160 --> 01:52:36.160]  Equitable estoppel is not what you're looking for,
[01:52:36.160 --> 01:52:39.160]  and I can't get it out,
[01:52:39.160 --> 01:52:46.160]  but this is basically what equity says is the good minus the bad.
[01:52:46.160 --> 01:52:49.160]  If the bad outweighs the good, the judge,
[01:52:49.160 --> 01:52:58.160]  he has a duty to find a just adjudication of cases.
[01:52:58.160 --> 01:53:01.160]  And I really don't know how to answer this correctly.
[01:53:01.160 --> 01:53:04.160]  I'd have to do a little research.
[01:53:04.160 --> 01:53:08.160]  Not a question I've been asked before.
[01:53:08.160 --> 01:53:11.160]  Right, it was a term that's in that jurisdiction,
[01:53:11.160 --> 01:53:12.160]  and that's my fault.
[01:53:12.160 --> 01:53:19.160]  I'm going to go back and review the context that the author used it,
[01:53:19.160 --> 01:53:22.160]  but I thought that I'd throw it out there.
[01:53:22.160 --> 01:53:27.160]  What I had to do here is pull up one of my rules.
[01:53:27.160 --> 01:53:33.160]  Never talk about something you don't know anything about.
[01:53:33.160 --> 01:53:37.160]  I once read a book years ago,
[01:53:37.160 --> 01:53:40.160]  and it said that if you're reading something
[01:53:40.160 --> 01:53:43.160]  and you find a word in there you don't know,
[01:53:43.160 --> 01:53:47.160]  just go back and look at the context in which you find it
[01:53:47.160 --> 01:53:49.160]  and figure out what it means.
[01:53:49.160 --> 01:53:51.160]  And I thought that was interesting,
[01:53:51.160 --> 01:53:58.160]  so what I was reading I was finding a lot of difficult terms,
[01:53:58.160 --> 01:53:59.160]  so I started doing that,
[01:53:59.160 --> 01:54:04.160]  and then I went to the dictionary to see how close I came.
[01:54:04.160 --> 01:54:12.160]  I did not get a single one even close.
[01:54:12.160 --> 01:54:15.160]  So all that nonsense of trying to figure out what words mean
[01:54:15.160 --> 01:54:22.160]  by the context you're in is a bad strategy.
[01:54:22.160 --> 01:54:29.160]  I try not to let myself assume that I know what a term means,
[01:54:29.160 --> 01:54:33.160]  especially when I'm working in law
[01:54:33.160 --> 01:54:39.160]  and a very good example of that is something I mentioned earlier in the show.
[01:54:39.160 --> 01:54:45.160]  I'm building a questionnaire on intoxication,
[01:54:45.160 --> 01:54:55.160]  and today I was mapping out intoxication offenses,
[01:54:55.160 --> 01:54:59.160]  and the first one was public intoxication.
[01:54:59.160 --> 01:55:06.160]  And public intoxication says that if you are intoxicated in a public,
[01:55:06.160 --> 01:55:14.160]  that it is an offense to be intoxicated in a public place.
[01:55:14.160 --> 01:55:21.160]  Okay, what does public place mean?
[01:55:21.160 --> 01:55:25.160]  Well, it's defined in the statute.
[01:55:25.160 --> 01:55:32.160]  In the statute it says a public place is an establishment license
[01:55:32.160 --> 01:55:38.160]  to sell intoxicating beverages.
[01:55:38.160 --> 01:55:47.160]  Now see if you can figure that one out from the context that you find it in.
[01:55:47.160 --> 01:55:50.160]  Well, we were at Deb's place one year,
[01:55:50.160 --> 01:55:54.160]  and we were having a big barbecue in the back,
[01:55:54.160 --> 01:55:56.160]  and this late in the evening this cop came along,
[01:55:56.160 --> 01:55:59.160]  and he wanted to come in the backyard, and we said, why?
[01:55:59.160 --> 01:56:06.160]  Well, he wanted to make sure that nobody was intoxicated.
[01:56:06.160 --> 01:56:09.160]  Get out of here.
[01:56:09.160 --> 01:56:17.160]  He stated that if you are intoxicated and you're in public,
[01:56:17.160 --> 01:56:21.160]  then I can see you, that's an offense.
[01:56:21.160 --> 01:56:28.160]  Well, I went and got it, and no, it's not an offense.
[01:56:28.160 --> 01:56:31.160]  It's only an offense if you're in a beer joint
[01:56:31.160 --> 01:56:36.160]  or a convenience store that sells booze.
[01:56:36.160 --> 01:56:40.160]  Always look these terms up,
[01:56:40.160 --> 01:56:45.160]  especially in law because they may not mean what they mean.
[01:56:45.160 --> 01:56:49.160]  So I would want to go back to Jurisdictionary,
[01:56:49.160 --> 01:56:54.160]  find his reference, and then do some research on it.
[01:56:54.160 --> 01:56:56.160]  Right, right.
[01:56:56.160 --> 01:57:02.160]  And looking up terms when you're reading legal issues
[01:57:02.160 --> 01:57:07.160]  is absolutely so valuable and vulnerable.
[01:57:07.160 --> 01:57:15.160]  Like in this case, if anybody out there has been charged with public intoxication,
[01:57:15.160 --> 01:57:24.160]  I can almost guarantee you that you were not in a beer joint at the time,
[01:57:24.160 --> 01:57:30.160]  that you probably thought public intoxication meant
[01:57:30.160 --> 01:57:35.160]  what the term means in the common vernacular.
[01:57:35.160 --> 01:57:40.160]  It doesn't mean any such thing, not even close.
[01:57:40.160 --> 01:57:43.160]  In a sense, it means the opposite of public.
[01:57:43.160 --> 01:57:48.160]  What if the guy is in his car behind the wheel and he...
[01:57:48.160 --> 01:57:53.160]  That's a question that I need to get answered.
[01:57:53.160 --> 01:57:59.160]  I just did Driving While Intoxicated,
[01:57:59.160 --> 01:58:06.160]  and it says that if you are operating a motor vehicle,
[01:58:06.160 --> 01:58:13.160]  the question becomes, what does operating mean?
[01:58:13.160 --> 01:58:18.160]  Does it mean moving the vehicle on...
[01:58:18.160 --> 01:58:24.160]  It says operating the motor vehicle on a public thoroughfare.
[01:58:24.160 --> 01:58:27.160]  So does it mean driving down the road?
[01:58:27.160 --> 01:58:33.160]  Does it mean sitting in the backseat parked at a curb?
[01:58:33.160 --> 01:58:39.160]  Does it mean sitting in the front seat on the passenger side?
[01:58:39.160 --> 01:58:45.160]  Does it mean sitting under the wheel, keys in condition?
[01:58:45.160 --> 01:58:50.160]  What does operating a motor vehicle mean?
[01:58:50.160 --> 01:58:54.160]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:58:54.160 --> 01:58:58.160]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.160 --> 01:59:02.160]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.160 --> 01:59:07.160]  but even the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.160 --> 01:59:09.160]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[01:59:09.160 --> 01:59:13.160]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.160 --> 01:59:18.160]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.160 --> 01:59:22.160]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.160 --> 01:59:28.160]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.160 --> 01:59:33.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.160 --> 01:59:43.160]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.160 --> 01:59:48.160]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.160 --> 01:59:51.160]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.160 --> 02:00:00.160]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.