[00:00.000 --> 00:07.720] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly [00:07.720 --> 00:09.920] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:09.920 --> 00:23.240] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:23.240 --> 00:29.560] Markets for Wednesday the 18th of January 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,211.45 [00:29.560 --> 00:37.800] an ounce, silver $17.23 an ounce, Texas crude $52.48 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently [00:37.800 --> 00:46.480] sitting at about $878 U.S. currency. [00:46.480 --> 00:52.400] Today in history, the year 2005, the Airbus A380, the world's largest commercial jet to [00:52.400 --> 00:56.040] date, is unveiled at its ceremony in Toll House, France. [00:56.040 --> 01:01.200] It has roughly 6,000 square feet of usable floor space, can seat up to 853 people in [01:01.200 --> 01:06.560] an all-economy class, and has a flight range of roughly 8,500 nautical miles. [01:06.560 --> 01:11.680] The Airbus A380 didn't get its first commercial flight until later that year in April, but [01:11.680 --> 01:18.080] it was unveiled today in history. [01:18.080 --> 01:22.320] In recent news, President Obama announced his exercise of clemency in commuting the [01:22.320 --> 01:27.400] sentence of Chelsea, formerly Bradley Manning. Manning had been arrested in 2010 after being [01:27.400 --> 01:32.160] outed by former hacker Adrian Lamo for being the main WikiLeaks source on the hundreds [01:32.160 --> 01:36.480] of thousands of sensitive U.S. government documents filed to him, which included cable [01:36.480 --> 01:41.880] gate and collateral murder, 39 minutes of classified gunsight footage in 2010 in Iraq, [01:41.880 --> 01:48.040] which shows two U.S. AH-64 Apache helicopters indiscriminately shooting and killing unarmed [01:48.040 --> 01:52.680] civilians, including two Iraqi war correspondents working for Reuters. [01:52.680 --> 01:57.380] Manning was held in virtual solitary confinement for 23 hours a day at a Marine Corps brig [01:57.380 --> 02:02.640] and sometimes even stripped completely naked. In 2013, he was sentenced in a military tribunal [02:02.640 --> 02:07.480] to 35 years in prison with the possibility of parole in the eighth year and dishonorably [02:07.480 --> 02:12.200] discharged from the Army. As a result of Obama's pardon, Manning will be free in May. [02:12.200 --> 02:16.320] To add a twist to all this, Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, tweeted last week via [02:16.320 --> 02:21.240] WikiLeaks' Twitter account that, quote, if Obama grants Manning clemency, Assange will [02:21.240 --> 02:27.480] agree to U.S. extradition despite clear unconstitutionality of the Department of Justice case. Assange [02:27.480 --> 02:32.240] has spent over four years in hideout at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Melinda Taylor, [02:32.240 --> 02:36.760] a member of Mr. Assange's legal team, recently stated to the press that everything that he [02:36.760 --> 02:38.760] has said, he's standing by. [02:38.760 --> 02:43.400] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors and even contributors. Is he [02:43.400 --> 02:47.680] a sponsor or a service you'd like to advertise with us or even want to write articles and [02:47.680 --> 02:54.680] read for us? Feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This is Rick Roady with your [02:54.680 --> 03:19.680] Lowdown for January 18, 2017. [03:19.680 --> 03:26.720] Hey, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, the Wheel of Law Radio. On this Friday, the 20th day [03:26.720 --> 03:42.640] of January 2017, we are officially under the thumb of Mr. Trump, our new sitting president. [03:42.640 --> 03:48.800] This ought to get interesting. And for those who weren't listening last night, I do have, [03:48.800 --> 03:55.240] I've been working on an e-book for a long time. We launched it last night. We'll be [03:55.240 --> 04:03.960] selling it in conjunction with the fundraiser. We have our fundraiser going and we'll be [04:03.960 --> 04:16.000] selling the e-book for $100. And the e-book, it's about 170, 160 some odd pages. I hope [04:16.000 --> 04:29.400] it's a good read. It is a compilation of pretty much all of the things that I have learned [04:29.400 --> 04:38.440] over the period of the last 10 years doing this radio show. It is the kind of information [04:38.440 --> 04:49.280] you just won't find anywhere else because I've certainly looked for it. I have a lot [04:49.280 --> 04:54.040] of experience doing a lot of different things and most of the things I know I've learned [04:54.040 --> 05:05.280] to myself, I have a lot of experience learning what to do. I told my son when he was growing [05:05.280 --> 05:11.840] up that if I tell you I don't think something's a good idea, it's because I've been around [05:11.840 --> 05:16.760] a while and I've got some experience and I've done a lot of things. You might look at it [05:16.760 --> 05:22.640] real careful, but if I tell you don't do that, which I'll probably tell you a whole lot, [05:22.640 --> 05:29.080] trust me, I can tell you how much it's going to cost you to fix it, how bad it's going [05:29.080 --> 05:37.240] to hurt and how much misery it's going to give you. Been there, done that. In the legal [05:37.240 --> 05:49.840] area, the first thing I looked for was this kind of information. Not so much what to do, [05:49.840 --> 05:58.120] but more what not to do. How to think about what you're doing, how to wrap your mind around [05:58.120 --> 06:07.280] the issue so that you're able to consistently make well-formed decisions on how to move [06:07.280 --> 06:14.480] ahead. I haven't found any of this in any of the books. It just wasn't out there. I've [06:14.480 --> 06:21.640] found bits and pieces in minor places, but they seem to only be afterthoughts. They're [06:21.640 --> 06:29.760] mostly from lawyers who've been practicing for 20 or 30 years, but they seem to only [06:29.760 --> 06:38.320] want to talk about what the law says and what practice and procedures dictate. Nobody talked [06:38.320 --> 06:51.560] about how to think about it from a basic level. Nobody seems to have taken their expertise, [06:51.560 --> 07:03.240] their lifetime of expertise and condense it down to some understandable rules and adages [07:03.240 --> 07:09.480] that you can use to keep you focused in the right direction. That is what this e-book [07:09.480 --> 07:18.640] is intended to be. I hope that I've been able to structure the delivery well. Part of it [07:18.640 --> 07:27.760] is that I've been delivering these same kinds of information for a long time and presenting [07:27.760 --> 07:34.920] it to different people in different situations. It's helped me develop some methods of imparting [07:34.920 --> 07:43.120] information that I'm hoping ordinary human beings can read it and make sense of. If anybody [07:43.120 --> 07:49.400] orders the e-book, if you look through it, you're going to find mistakes. I got those. [07:49.400 --> 07:55.880] I went through and tried to find them all, but I don't see that happening. I could probably [07:55.880 --> 08:01.240] read it a thousand times and I'll miss the same mistakes every time. This is one of the [08:01.240 --> 08:06.720] cases where you get what is intended to be a comprehensive book, but you also got direct [08:06.720 --> 08:17.400] access to the author in a way that will help improve the book for everybody that I hope. [08:17.400 --> 08:25.880] Anybody who gets this and reads it, I would appreciate it if you would rip it to shreds. [08:25.880 --> 08:35.280] Anytime I have written something and you read it, and you have to read it twice to make [08:35.280 --> 08:44.160] sense out of what I've said, I've screwed it up. I didn't structure it correctly. I want [08:44.160 --> 08:51.520] to know about that. I want to know when I create a question in your mind that I don't [08:51.520 --> 08:59.320] answer. This goes to flow. There's a section in the book on flow. Once you read the section [08:59.320 --> 09:08.160] on flow, then you'll understand why I'm asking you to do what I'm asking you to do now. It [09:08.160 --> 09:19.960] would make perfect sense because if I assume that you know something that you don't. One [09:19.960 --> 09:27.240] of the hardest things for someone who's knowledgeable in a subject to do is anticipate what the [09:27.240 --> 09:37.600] other person doesn't know. All this information I am intimately familiar with. I don't always [09:37.600 --> 09:46.160] know what you don't know. I know someone put a comment on my Facebook that Mr. Calhoun [09:46.160 --> 09:53.520] hates to be pedantic. Well, I do hate to be pedantic, but sometimes you have to be in [09:53.520 --> 10:02.280] order to keep from leaving important things out that 95% of your readers will already [10:02.280 --> 10:11.800] know, but that other 5% is going to trip over this and get stuck. I didn't have no idea [10:11.800 --> 10:22.440] what I'm talking about. So the conundrum is how do I be pedantic in a way that doesn't [10:22.440 --> 10:32.800] insult the educated reader and keeps the educated and knowledgeable reader engaged while being [10:32.800 --> 10:39.040] able to deliver this information to the first time, the person who's exposed to it for the [10:39.040 --> 10:48.680] first time. This is my conundrum and I would appreciate anybody's help who reads this. [10:48.680 --> 10:59.080] Let me know so I can improve this tool. If we can get one or two people using these practices [10:59.080 --> 11:09.600] in every county in a particular state, we will change everything and it will change [11:09.600 --> 11:19.120] quickly. A lot of people, a lot of readers have, listeners have taken these practices [11:19.120 --> 11:30.200] and used them and have found them to be of great value and effective. If any of these [11:30.200 --> 11:37.920] practices or procedures that I present here, you find not to be of good value or if you [11:37.920 --> 11:49.080] find in practice that they lead to bad outcomes, let me know. I need to know and I assume these [11:49.080 --> 11:56.280] are all well structured. The most part, whatever I suggest somebody want to do, I suggest they [11:56.280 --> 12:06.080] do it a certain way because I've done it a number of times and I develop a way of doing [12:06.080 --> 12:13.440] it to avoid problems. I don't always explain every possible problem that can have, can [12:13.440 --> 12:22.720] occur because there's too many possibilities, but I prescribe methods to go in about things [12:22.720 --> 12:34.240] that I have found to be generally and or of a general application to be effective. Now [12:34.240 --> 12:38.720] there's specific situations where things will obviously change, but in this book I could [12:38.720 --> 12:46.080] only be general. The amount of specificity I could get to is limited because I don't [12:46.080 --> 12:55.360] want this thing 500 pages long. Anyway, I know I said I must be rambling, but I am excited [12:55.360 --> 13:06.280] about this as a tool, as a way to expand the root of our radios and reach to people beyond [13:06.280 --> 13:15.120] just those listening to my voice on this program. So we'd appreciate anyone who finds what we [13:15.120 --> 13:28.480] present here to be a value. To at least consider the ebook, it will be the best money you can [13:28.480 --> 13:37.840] spend. If you have any legal issue, even traffic tickets, it'll show you a way of holding your [13:37.840 --> 13:48.560] mind when you walk in the door that changes everything. I walk into a courthouse and anybody [13:48.560 --> 13:53.440] there talk to me five minutes and they know they better be careful with this guy. This [13:53.440 --> 13:59.040] guy's going to clobber you if you don't. I'm always nice. I'm always pleasant. I'm never [13:59.040 --> 14:05.160] threatening and that's, that's in the book. I'm never threatening because they never give [14:05.160 --> 14:15.080] fair warning. And that's part of their problem. They, since I don't give fair warnings by [14:15.080 --> 14:19.800] telling them, Oh, I got these rats. I got those rats. You're supposed to do this. You're [14:19.800 --> 14:25.000] supposed to do that. They never get that from me. I just tell them what I want to do, what [14:25.000 --> 14:31.240] I want them to do. When they don't, I say, Oh, okay. The most fair warning I tend to [14:31.240 --> 14:37.720] give them is, well, brother, we'll see how that works out for you. And then I go to the [14:37.720 --> 14:48.520] next step. I, I just Thursday sent to the special agent in charge for the, uh, FBI field [14:48.520 --> 14:58.120] office in Dallas, a official pressure, official misconduct charge against federal judge, John [14:58.120 --> 15:07.400] McBride. Oh, you want to dismiss my case with my challenge to, you want to dismiss my petition [15:07.400 --> 15:12.640] for declaratory judgment with prejudice on a rule 12 motion for failure to state a claim [15:12.640 --> 15:18.360] on which can be had. Well, in a declaratory judgment suit, there is no claim for which [15:18.360 --> 15:28.040] recovery can be had by, as a matter of the structure of the petition. Obviously this [15:28.040 --> 15:34.520] judge did exactly what I accuse him of is he dismissed it out of hand without even reading [15:34.520 --> 15:41.240] it. And he did it as stupid as he possibly could. Now, did I go out back to judge McBride [15:41.240 --> 15:47.240] and say, Oh, I object. I object. You didn't do that right. You're supposed to do this, [15:47.240 --> 15:52.520] that or the other. No, I'm not going to tell him that he's a smart judge. He already knows [15:52.520 --> 15:58.080] that. When you deal with a public official, they violate a law relating to their office. [15:58.080 --> 16:02.280] You can't assume they don't know what they're doing. Of course they know what they're doing. [16:02.280 --> 16:08.480] If they don't, they're screwed. Screws for us. So since he already knows what he's doing, [16:08.480 --> 16:13.720] I could tell the next guy. Now I'm not going to tell this special agent in charge that [16:13.720 --> 16:18.000] the reason I'm sending it to him is to get him not to send it to the attorney general [16:18.000 --> 16:26.040] the way 28 US code 535 tells him to. So send that file against him. Oh, this is great fun. [16:26.040 --> 16:30.160] You guys will love it. Going to break, Randy Kelton, the ruler of our radio. I called in [16:30.160 --> 16:38.400] number 512-646-1984. Got the call lights open. We'll keep them open all night. Give us a [16:38.400 --> 16:46.960] call. Most any subjects concerning law tend to avoid politics. It always gives me a bite. [16:46.960 --> 16:50.800] Give us a call. We'll be waiting for you all night. We'll be right back. [17:16.960 --> 17:24.920] These have apples. Really? Oh, that's an actual apple. Yummy apple. I'm going to throw away [17:24.920 --> 17:31.000] these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down [17:31.000 --> 17:38.080] to cookies and clear them. Bye bye, yucky cookies. Now I go to logosradio.network.com and I click [17:38.080 --> 17:43.680] on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon [17:43.680 --> 17:49.960] through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. New cookies for me? Consider it an early [17:49.960 --> 17:55.160] Christmas present. And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little [17:55.160 --> 18:01.720] present to this radio network, too. P is for cookie. P is for classified. Are you being harassed [18:01.720 --> 18:07.280] by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with [18:07.280 --> 18:12.560] the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt [18:12.560 --> 18:18.000] collectors, and now you can win, too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how [18:18.000 --> 18:22.960] to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, [18:22.960 --> 18:28.120] mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out [18:28.120 --> 18:33.740] of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.740 --> 18:39.320] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal [18:39.320 --> 18:44.520] consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [18:44.520 --> 18:49.880] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's [18:49.880 --> 18:59.840] ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:59.840 --> 19:10.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [19:29.840 --> 19:46.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio, and on this Friday the 20th day of January [19:46.280 --> 19:56.320] 2017. And in looking at the e-book, the e-book is really general. It doesn't go to cases. [19:56.320 --> 20:08.120] I will be adding material to this e-book. And one of the things I'm working on right now are forms. [20:08.120 --> 20:15.560] When you write motions or pleadings, you know, I get a lot of people call in and say, [20:15.560 --> 20:22.520] what should I do in this case? What should I do in that case? I have a set of forms, [20:22.520 --> 20:31.080] standard forms, and I've been studying how these forms are structured. And it turns out that the [20:31.080 --> 20:38.280] stuff you have to put into a form, like for motions, if you ever go to a motion hearing, [20:38.280 --> 20:45.280] the judge will schedule one day for motion hearings, and he'll hear one motion after another. It takes [20:45.280 --> 20:50.040] about four or five minutes each. They'll hand him a motion. He looks over it. It takes him two [20:50.040 --> 20:56.640] minutes. It's got all this stuff in there, but it only takes him two minutes. It only takes him [20:56.640 --> 21:06.240] two minutes because there's all this technical stuff that has to be there. Then the heading, [21:06.240 --> 21:18.440] the citation, whatever the case cause number is, parties, jurisdiction. There has to be a certificate [21:18.440 --> 21:25.040] of service. If there's facts, there has to be acknowledgement. And these are the portions of [21:25.040 --> 21:36.480] the motions or pleadings that take the most detail. And the place where most lawyers, [21:36.480 --> 21:44.120] paralegals and proceeds make their biggest blunders, they get the wrong address on a [21:44.120 --> 21:51.120] party or they leave something out. They miss something. And then the other side catches it [21:51.120 --> 21:58.200] and then they hammer them for it. And they have this, it's a real pain in the neck. So I will be [21:58.200 --> 22:09.760] building a tool where I take all of these forms and I put them in a folder. And then there's an [22:09.760 --> 22:17.200] input form in the folder. You go in and input your name, address. And then if you have a court case, [22:17.200 --> 22:24.440] you put in the cause number, you put in the opposing party, opposing party's lawyer, all their [22:24.440 --> 22:32.920] addresses, all this technical detail that goes on every single document you would file with the [22:32.920 --> 22:41.680] court. And all of those things that change with every single case. And the tiny annoying details [22:41.680 --> 22:47.800] that will give you incredible grief if you screw one up, like getting a party's address wrong. [22:47.800 --> 22:54.040] And then you send them proof of service and you just jump up down, clap your hands because they [22:54.040 --> 23:00.760] don't respond. And then you find out you sent it to the wrong address. That is so annoying. So, [23:00.760 --> 23:10.880] well, once you filled out this input form, then you go look at a motion or a pleading. And then [23:10.880 --> 23:17.480] you open that pleading and it'll auto fill all this stuff for you. And then you only have to [23:17.480 --> 23:23.520] put in what's pertinent to this particular motion. You don't have to worry about all that other stuff, [23:23.520 --> 23:33.040] getting a typo in it or forget to put something in. That I will be adding to the ebook through a [23:33.040 --> 23:39.360] website I'll be setting up. So anybody who buys the ebook, once I get the website set up, I'll [23:39.360 --> 23:44.720] give you a login and go to that website, put in your basic information. It'll all be secured [23:44.720 --> 23:53.520] so then get out. And then you just go look at these motions. Say the lawyer files a motion to [23:53.520 --> 24:01.600] withdraw. We go to the section on attorneys and then we go down to withdraw and right onto motion [24:01.600 --> 24:09.760] to withdraw is opposition to withdraw. And you open that up and it'll populate the whole thing. [24:09.760 --> 24:14.920] And then there'll be a little section in there where you type in why you don't want to withdraw. [24:14.920 --> 24:22.560] And even most of that we will already put in because most of the reasons that you would object [24:22.560 --> 24:28.760] to a lawyer withdrawing is because they're already paid in. He's under contract. So all that stuff, [24:28.760 --> 24:39.120] you just open it up, boom, it's done for you. And then as we work with these, people do these [24:39.120 --> 24:48.080] motions and you have a particular issue, say under an opposition to motion to withdraw. [24:48.080 --> 24:56.160] We'll add another section to address a particular issue. We'll put in folders for case law. We're [24:56.160 --> 25:02.400] going to make this Lexis on steroids. It's something I've been working on for a long time. And it turns [25:02.400 --> 25:13.680] out this ebook is a good segue into building an electronic lawyer essentially. But we will be [25:13.680 --> 25:21.360] adding a tremendous number of resources that will do these minor annoying little things that [25:23.040 --> 25:25.920] are repetitive and are often [25:25.920 --> 25:31.360] called, I'm trying to think of the right way to say this, [25:31.360 --> 25:36.560] when the other side does something, it implies certain things you should do. [25:38.640 --> 25:42.080] But if you don't know anything about law, you don't know what it implies. [25:43.280 --> 25:46.880] So if somebody files a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, [25:48.400 --> 25:52.000] you have to file an answer and you have to file an answer within a certain time. [25:52.000 --> 25:56.640] And if you don't file that answer, until you file that answer, there are certain things the [25:56.640 --> 26:03.600] other side can't do. And we will start putting in explanations of these. So if you get a motion [26:03.600 --> 26:09.920] from the other side, you could go here and you open an opposition. It's going to explain to you [26:11.120 --> 26:18.800] what you need to know about that motion. So hopefully we can take someone who is not a legal [26:18.800 --> 26:31.520] expert. And just by following the steps, as the steps come through the litigation of the case, [26:32.320 --> 26:38.880] we'll be able to give them the specific information they need for whatever issues in front of them. [26:38.880 --> 26:52.560] So we're offering it also, if you buy the ebook, you'll get four chances in our drawing for the, [26:53.840 --> 27:00.880] I think it's an AR-15, I wrote it down. I was a weapon specialist in the military, but [27:00.880 --> 27:13.520] after getting out of the military, I stopped being a gun guy. It's an assault rifle, full assault [27:13.520 --> 27:19.200] rifle this year. I'll look it up on the break and then I'll get you the exact specification on it. [27:19.200 --> 27:26.640] Okay. Enough of my rambling. We've got a bunch of callers already. I'm going to go ahead and go to [27:26.640 --> 27:40.000] Scott in Texas. Hello, Scott. How you doing? Did it wake you up? No, no. I can barely hear you though. [27:40.800 --> 27:47.280] So I was just wondering. I don't know what to do. I've got a mixer, a big mixer here and I've got it [27:47.280 --> 27:54.480] maxed out. I've got the microphone almost stuck down my throat. I'm looking for a pre-app to put [27:54.480 --> 28:00.640] on this thing, but just the problem is if I pre-app it, then my mixer begins to crash out. So [28:01.680 --> 28:12.320] I'll try to stay close to the microphone. Okay. Well anyhow, I did send a writ of mandamus over [28:12.320 --> 28:26.400] to the fifth yesterday on them trying to figure out why they have jurisdiction over a case or, [28:26.400 --> 28:32.960] you know, for an appeal. Okay. Okay. Okay. This is an appeal for the traffic ticket appeal to the [28:32.960 --> 28:40.000] court of appeals. Yeah. From Mesquite to the fifth district in Dallas. Okay. They sent me back [28:40.000 --> 28:47.200] one during one day. Okay. That's what I thought. I saw your email. I responded to it. You didn't [28:47.200 --> 28:55.200] ask me back. Yes, I did. Well, I didn't bother to read it then. Oh, well you didn't bother to pick [28:55.200 --> 29:04.080] up my calls all week either. Okay. Here's the deal. Mesquite. So that's the city of Mesquite. [29:04.080 --> 29:15.840] Yeah. You can't appeal a traffic ticket to the court of appeals. That is appeal to the county [29:15.840 --> 29:26.640] court. Oh. By a motion to non-suit. There are a motion to withdraw the appeal. [29:26.640 --> 29:36.720] And then, oh, this is a problem. What? It should have been filed with the county court. [29:41.200 --> 29:47.440] So the motion, you need a motion for leave to file with the county court as it was timely filed, [29:47.440 --> 29:57.280] but filed in the wrong jurisdiction. They're likely to throw it out. Hang on. We'll be right back. [30:03.280 --> 30:07.920] Do you rise with the roosters or hoot with the owls? Either way, it's your brain that [30:07.920 --> 30:12.640] determines what time of day you're at your best. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with [30:12.640 --> 30:19.200] new research on how the clock affects brain function next. Privacy is under attack. When [30:19.200 --> 30:24.400] you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, [30:24.400 --> 30:30.640] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance [30:30.640 --> 30:36.480] and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought [30:36.480 --> 30:43.440] to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over [30:43.440 --> 30:50.560] with Startpage. Are you a morning person or a night owl? Researchers say our brains determine [30:50.560 --> 30:55.520] the answer. They scan volunteers for muscle strength and the excitability of pathways through [30:55.520 --> 31:00.880] their nervous systems. They found the brains of early risers worked best at 9 a.m. while the [31:00.880 --> 31:06.880] night owls peaked at 9 p.m. Late sleepers also grew stronger throughout the day while morning [31:06.880 --> 31:12.880] folks stayed steady. So early birds, go easy on those night owls. Sleeping in is more a function [31:12.880 --> 31:18.240] of biology than willpower. And once they clear the sleep from their eyes, night owls grow stronger [31:18.240 --> 31:24.960] with each passing moment so they're on a continual upswing. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, [31:24.960 --> 31:31.360] the world's most private search engine. [31:55.040 --> 32:00.720] And see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you. Only at mqsa.org. [32:02.720 --> 32:07.040] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live [32:07.040 --> 32:10.560] in an us-against-them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.560 --> 32:14.720] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to [32:14.720 --> 32:18.720] travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, [32:18.720 --> 32:23.360] the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn [32:23.360 --> 32:27.840] how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, [32:27.840 --> 32:31.440] in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool [32:31.440 --> 32:35.520] available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of [32:35.520 --> 32:40.160] law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [32:40.160 --> 32:43.840] ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas [32:43.840 --> 32:48.400] Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [32:48.400 --> 32:52.320] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your [32:52.320 --> 32:56.240] rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, [32:56.240 --> 33:22.720] and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:26.240 --> 33:38.960] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Scott in Texas. Scott, [33:38.960 --> 33:44.240] I think you have a problem, and I'm surprised you didn't know that. [33:45.600 --> 33:50.560] Haven't you already appealed a traffic ticket to a county court? [33:50.560 --> 33:59.840] No, this was actually because Addison denied that appeal from that judge over there, [34:00.720 --> 34:06.960] and so when he denied it, I didn't know you could just go ahead and appeal straight to [34:08.000 --> 34:12.560] the other court. I thought you could go through the judge, and so now I found out you can bypass [34:12.560 --> 34:18.880] that and just directly appeal yourself, but I didn't appeal that. So I asked you, and you're the [34:18.880 --> 34:24.160] one who told me to go ahead and stick it in. Okay, well, okay, now this is different information. [34:24.160 --> 34:30.320] That was the whole point I was going to. So you tried to appeal to the county court, [34:30.320 --> 34:37.200] and they denied it. So now you've appealed the county court's denial. I have not, no, because [34:37.200 --> 34:45.360] this was from Mesquite Municipal Court where they got the judgment, and so I appealed straight from [34:45.360 --> 34:49.520] that. I stuck the appeal over in the fifth because I thought that's where it was supposed to go. [34:50.640 --> 34:59.200] Okay, you, okay, it's always the same. You always have to appeal a municipal court decision [34:59.760 --> 35:06.000] to a county court, always. Okay, well, you told me it was to put it in the fifth. That's where [35:06.880 --> 35:10.480] I put it. Okay, look, Scott, Scott, this is not a mistake I make. [35:10.480 --> 35:18.960] You're a mistake I make, but you said you tried to file it with the county and the county denied it. [35:18.960 --> 35:26.000] No, never, because you know the case. I mean, it was in Mesquite. [35:26.000 --> 35:34.560] Yeah, I don't memorize these cases. Okay, Scott, the rule is the rule, and I don't forget the rule. [35:34.560 --> 35:42.480] So if you tried to file with the county court and the, okay, whoa, wait, hold on. Here's a problem [35:42.480 --> 35:53.440] with pronouns. Don't use pronouns. I tried to file an appeal and they denied it. Who was they? [35:53.440 --> 36:05.680] I have the only... That was a question. You tried to file an appeal and they denied it. That's what [36:05.680 --> 36:12.720] you told me. Now, I assumed when you said that, that they was the county court because that's [36:12.720 --> 36:19.600] where you file an appeal from in the municipal court. Is that who denied your appeal? No, the judge [36:19.600 --> 36:25.760] originally denied the appeal in Mesquite. Okay, now we need to teach you how to deliver [36:25.760 --> 36:33.520] good information. Yes. Who first? Mesquite judge denied your appeal to the county court. [36:35.040 --> 36:42.000] Now we've got something that you can... Okay, we still can't take that to the fifth. [36:44.080 --> 36:47.760] Yeah, I don't know why. I don't know how the fifth even got involved in this. [36:47.760 --> 36:52.960] So now the fifth wanted to know the information. It was funny because when I sent it over there, [36:52.960 --> 36:56.000] they wanted the information. I was like, okay, send them the information. [36:59.040 --> 37:05.280] Yeah, well, they didn't know it was improperly filed. Now this is what the fifth needs. [37:07.280 --> 37:14.800] You maintained that you filed and that you gave a notice of appeal to the municipal court judge. [37:14.800 --> 37:19.040] The municipal court denied your appeal to the county court. [37:21.680 --> 37:24.800] So your next point of appeal was the fifth circuit. [37:26.560 --> 37:33.360] And now what the fifth will do is give you direction and say, no, [37:34.400 --> 37:39.280] when the municipal court denies your appeal, this is what you must do. [37:39.280 --> 37:43.200] And then they'll almost certainly grant you time to do that. [37:46.080 --> 37:50.720] So if you had just overstepped the county court, then they'd have probably blew you off, [37:50.720 --> 37:59.280] but you didn't. You filed with the municipal court and if you filed timely and met the [38:00.400 --> 38:06.240] rules of the municipal court, then they're going to tell you how to [38:06.240 --> 38:12.640] handle this because the municipal court will have necessarily violated due process. [38:15.600 --> 38:22.240] So explain that to the court of appeals that you filed with the county court, [38:22.240 --> 38:26.240] but the local municipal court denied your appeal to the county court. [38:27.200 --> 38:31.360] Well, I did effectively because what I wrote to the M [38:31.360 --> 38:39.280] was basically that the judge had denied my appeal to the county court and then I'm writing to y'all [38:39.280 --> 38:47.280] and then they wanted to, they wanted me to write them back. I think I sent that over there to you too. [38:49.600 --> 38:52.480] They had a question about their jurisdiction [38:52.480 --> 38:59.040] and so I sent that quote or will rent out and you said, no, knucklehead, you can't use that. [38:59.040 --> 39:04.160] It needs to be like a written mandamus. So I wrote a written mandamus and sent it over there [39:04.160 --> 39:13.120] answering their question and also to bring the judge in compliance and basically you can't hear [39:13.120 --> 39:14.640] the case. You can't hear the case. [39:14.640 --> 39:22.320] And also to bring the judge in compliance and basically you can't hear the case. [39:22.320 --> 39:30.960] You asked the court of appeals to order the municipal judge to forward your appeal to the [39:30.960 --> 39:37.440] county clerk. Is that correct? Didn't say forward to the county clerk. [39:37.440 --> 39:44.080] Hang on, I'll pull it up again. What did you ask in your, what did you [39:44.080 --> 39:46.720] ask the court of appeals to mandate? [39:46.720 --> 40:11.200] It would be, it was, they sent a letter on January 9th concerning jurisdiction of this court. This [40:11.200 --> 40:16.080] court has jurisdiction well established by our counterplan. It's been on file well before the [40:16.080 --> 40:20.960] trial day and well over 90 days old. Unanswered should be noted that when the municipal court [40:20.960 --> 40:28.400] was challenged, the court went silent. Furthermore, after the trial, a guilty verdict was rendered. [40:28.400 --> 40:32.800] A challenge to subject matter jurisdiction was entered onto the record the next day. [40:32.800 --> 40:38.960] Judge Crane denied outright. Judge Crane performed acts of law with violence abusing his discretion, [40:38.960 --> 40:44.160] treason to his oath. The decision to convey a hearing to determine subject matter jurisdiction [40:44.160 --> 40:52.080] was probably properly established in order to enter any verdict. I asked the court issue a [40:53.040 --> 41:00.320] rear mandamus on Judge Crane, removing him of office until he can perform his duties as prescribed [41:00.320 --> 41:05.600] by code, statute code and law. Okay. Wrong place to do that. [41:07.120 --> 41:13.920] Thanks. What they're going to do is almost certainly is rule they don't have subject [41:13.920 --> 41:22.960] matter jurisdiction for that rid of mandamus for that question, that should have went to the county [41:22.960 --> 41:35.280] court. And what will happen based on your response here is they will re-characterize [41:35.280 --> 41:47.520] your filing as a rid of mandamus and not an appeal. And now you need to take, this raises a question, [41:47.520 --> 41:54.960] which I'm not sure what the answer is. Or even if there's case law on this, if you file a proper [41:54.960 --> 42:05.360] appeal with the proper court, so you, I'm sorry, if you give a notice of appeal to the trial court [42:07.440 --> 42:14.000] and the trial court does not forward your records to the appellate court, which in this case will be [42:14.000 --> 42:26.240] the county court, how much time do you have in order to secure a mandamus? I'm going to say [42:26.240 --> 42:35.600] you filed your notice of appeal timely. So you got it in time. So that clock's not running. [42:35.600 --> 42:42.400] Okay. The issue here is that the municipal court did not [42:43.840 --> 42:52.640] forward the records the way they were required to. So now go to, you might notice the court of appeals [42:52.640 --> 43:03.200] to withdraw your appeal as filed an error and then file a rid of mandamus with the county court [43:03.200 --> 43:10.160] ordering, asking the county court to order the municipal court to forward all the documentation [43:10.160 --> 43:20.000] to the county court. Okay. This is, this is not the place to argue the subject matter [43:20.000 --> 43:27.040] jurisdiction issue. First, you have to get it into court so you can argue that issue. [43:27.040 --> 43:35.760] You can argue that issue. So it's, it's, it's okay because it's very clear to these guys [43:36.800 --> 43:43.680] that you're going to get to the court of appeals. But first you made a mistake and you're learning, [43:44.720 --> 43:51.920] but unlike most people, you're not going away. You make a mistake, you correct it and keep going. [43:51.920 --> 43:57.360] Hang on to fixing stuff on the other side. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Rue La Radio. [44:02.320 --> 44:07.520] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you [44:07.520 --> 44:13.280] to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books [44:13.280 --> 44:17.360] and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [44:17.360 --> 44:22.400] Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:22.400 --> 44:26.560] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, [44:26.560 --> 44:34.880] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us [44:34.880 --> 44:43.120] online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't [44:43.120 --> 44:48.960] forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [45:01.120 --> 45:06.240] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with [45:06.240 --> 45:13.920] Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, [45:13.920 --> 45:20.800] step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, [45:20.800 --> 45:26.640] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now [45:26.640 --> 45:33.200] you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [45:33.200 --> 45:38.960] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:38.960 --> 45:44.640] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [45:44.640 --> 45:52.320] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.320 --> 46:03.680] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [46:22.400 --> 46:27.840] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelcom, Rule of Law Radio here with Scott in Texas. [46:28.800 --> 46:34.960] And Scott, you need to get the ebook and read the part about no pronouns. [46:36.080 --> 46:44.560] For the rest of this conversation, I would like you to practice not using any pronouns at all. [46:46.080 --> 46:50.800] I know you've listened to me on the air and you've heard me say that I don't need to sound [46:50.800 --> 47:02.160] pedantic. And when you don't use pronouns, at first to the writer or to the speaker, [47:02.160 --> 47:08.880] it sounds pedantic. It sounds like you're giving unnecessary detail. [47:10.800 --> 47:18.400] And the reason it does that is because you have exquisite access to referential index. [47:18.400 --> 47:26.640] You know precisely who you're referring to. I, as the listener, may or may not know. [47:27.760 --> 47:34.880] Any time you use a pronoun, I'm going to be mentally stopped for a second. And I got to [47:34.880 --> 47:42.160] back up and go through the conversation to make sure that I apply that he, them, her, they, [47:42.160 --> 47:49.600] to the right entity. And once I'm sure I got that right, then I can move on. That breaks me right [47:49.600 --> 47:58.480] out of flow. And that only happens if you're being very, very careful. If you're not being [47:58.480 --> 48:07.440] very, very careful, you will use the term they. And I assume that I know who they refers to. [48:07.440 --> 48:13.760] It may or may not be correct. And if I'm incorrect, now we're going down a rabbit hole. [48:14.640 --> 48:18.160] I think we're talking about one thing. You think we're talking about another, [48:18.160 --> 48:22.320] and neither one of us knows what we're talking about. Does that make sense, Scott? [48:23.760 --> 48:30.640] Oh yeah. Okay. I'll be a little bit more definitive from here on out, trust me. So [48:30.640 --> 48:37.120] was you saying that that would be a writ of mandamus to the county court? Wait a minute. Wait, you just [48:37.120 --> 48:44.000] used a pronoun. What? That. Referential index for that. [48:46.080 --> 48:56.240] You said to submit a writ of mandamus to the court in order to order the county court to get the [48:56.240 --> 49:02.880] records from the municipal court. Perfect. That, I can't misconstrue that. [49:04.160 --> 49:09.840] What you just said. If I'm a lawyer, it's my job to misconstrue everything you say. [49:10.560 --> 49:20.640] That I could not misconstrue. Okay. Yes. Okay. Mandamus to the county court because of the county [49:20.640 --> 49:28.880] court is the next court in line of jurisdiction. And it sounds to me like the court of appeals [49:29.920 --> 49:38.560] is doing to you exactly what Harmon Taylor keeps telling people. They're hitting you with a padded [49:38.560 --> 49:45.440] tube before. They're trying to cheat you. They're going to deny your pleading because they know [49:45.440 --> 49:54.560] you can't give them jurisdiction. But the appeals courts is going to give you opportunity to try [49:54.560 --> 49:59.280] to give them jurisdiction. And in doing that, you're going to figure out that you can't. [50:01.040 --> 50:11.280] They do this all the time. This is a standard thing that judges do. And I'm constantly telling [50:11.280 --> 50:18.960] people when they get a response from the court, they don't like, just read it, read it real careful. [50:20.400 --> 50:28.400] Because for the most part, they do this to both sides of an issue. If they deny a motion or [50:28.400 --> 50:33.200] pleading, they're going to tell you why they denied it. This is what's wrong. This is what's [50:33.200 --> 50:39.760] wrong. This is what's wrong. One of my favorite documents I ever read was on 38th of July, [50:39.760 --> 50:50.480] was a 38 page response to a appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a traffic ticket. [50:52.000 --> 50:57.040] And the guy was using a lot of this patriot mythology garbage. [50:59.200 --> 51:07.520] I read the appeal, it was trash. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court spent [51:07.520 --> 51:15.840] 38 pages going through that in excruciating detail telling me telling him this was wrong. [51:15.840 --> 51:20.080] This is wrong. This is wrong. And this is why and this is how you need to fix it. [51:21.040 --> 51:24.320] And they explained every step what he needed to do to fix it. [51:26.000 --> 51:34.960] I was astonished. It was a wonderful piece of education, educated material. So, okay, enough of [51:34.960 --> 51:46.720] that. Yes, mandamus to the county court. You filed your appeal timely. The municipal court denied it. [51:47.920 --> 51:51.840] You asked the county court to order them to give you appeal to their court. [51:54.880 --> 52:04.160] And then file a motion to withdraw your appeal from the court of appeals being very apologetic [52:04.160 --> 52:11.760] at your pro se ignorance and promise never to do it again. And you appreciate their education. [52:15.520 --> 52:20.400] This is good. Here I see all the courts and everything. Nobody's screwing anybody around [52:20.400 --> 52:29.440] here. They're all doing what they're supposed to. Okay, that's cool. [52:29.440 --> 52:34.960] And just for the listener, you know, this is a mistake that Scott made. [52:36.240 --> 52:43.760] Well, take one guess how I'm familiar with that mistake. [52:45.920 --> 52:53.040] Being there, done that. I have some knowledge of how to move around in the courts. And that's [52:53.040 --> 52:57.040] because I've done it wrong. That's about everything you can do wrong. I've done it wrong. [52:57.040 --> 53:07.200] Well, wait, wait, wait. The definition between mistake and error. You don't ever want to say [53:07.200 --> 53:17.120] that you made an error because an error can have criminal liabilities against the word errors and [53:17.120 --> 53:23.520] omissions insurance. You always say you made a mistake. The mistake, they can't punish you [53:23.520 --> 53:30.320] for a mistake. Well, hell, everybody makes mistakes, but an error that could lead to criminal charges. [53:30.320 --> 53:38.080] So that's real. You never forget anything. You simply don't recall. [53:40.240 --> 53:49.440] Right. Yeah. Now this is pedantic, but as cases get more serious, [53:49.440 --> 53:59.040] these become issues. And Scott, you're exactly right. An error is in law has a different meaning [53:59.040 --> 54:10.560] than a mistake. A mistake in law is an excusable error. An error that's not excusable is negligence. [54:10.560 --> 54:18.320] But that's a little fine. But right now it's enough to know that if you file a document in good [54:18.320 --> 54:25.760] faith, for the most part, at least once you get out of these municipal courts, the courts will [54:25.760 --> 54:35.360] treat them in good faith. If you've done your homework and they're less tolerant with lawyers, [54:35.360 --> 54:41.040] they're less tolerant with lawyers, but with proceeds, they're pretty tolerant. [54:41.760 --> 54:49.520] If you go to them and give them a good argument, you know, I seldom get much of an attitude from [54:49.520 --> 55:00.400] courts over my pleadings because the primary trick is to make your pleading look like the other [55:00.400 --> 55:11.600] lawyers' pleadings. And the way to do that is plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize. Exactly. [55:11.600 --> 55:17.680] Nice segue into these forms that I'm building. Once I get these forms up, [55:18.800 --> 55:26.080] I will suggest that nobody ever write a pleading from scratch. [55:26.080 --> 55:33.520] The forms that I'm building, the structure of those forms are taken from some of the local [55:33.520 --> 55:43.680] litigation guides. So this is exactly how the courts expect to see these motions and pleadings [55:43.680 --> 55:51.440] put together. That's why the judge can take a motion and she knows what it is because he [55:51.440 --> 55:56.640] knows what it is because he can ignore all this other stuff. It looks exactly like what you've [55:56.640 --> 56:06.480] seen 500 times. So he only has to look at the meat. So once you get that part down, and once [56:06.480 --> 56:12.160] I get this up, it'll make that part a lot easier. But until I have it, don't write your own motion [56:12.160 --> 56:18.960] if you can avoid it. Find one that a lawyer has already written and do it in that form. That'll [56:18.960 --> 56:25.760] tell the judge that you're using correct form and you're struggling to get this right. They will [56:25.760 --> 56:32.480] generally treat you just like a young lawyer and give you the same kind of positive feedback that [56:32.480 --> 56:39.360] they give lawyers. Sometimes it's not so positive to young lawyers, but judges mentor lawyers and [56:39.360 --> 56:45.040] they'll mentor you as well if you treat them with respect. That's enough. I'm not going to say [56:45.040 --> 56:49.600] anything else good about judges for tonight. I don't want anybody mad at me. Okay, Scott, [56:49.600 --> 56:58.160] you had another comment and I cut you off. Yeah. And shoot, I was trying to think of exactly. I [56:58.160 --> 57:05.120] had a real specific point I wanted to make too and I can't seem to recall it right now. Dang it. [57:05.120 --> 57:13.600] Well, my mama is 94 and she tells me that's not going to get better. And actually part of this [57:13.600 --> 57:22.640] is in the e-book. This goes to pattern interruptions, a tool that you can use to trigger amnesia. [57:23.760 --> 57:31.280] You can trigger short-term amnesia. If I tell you something that I don't want you to be able to [57:31.280 --> 57:41.440] consciously think about, all I have to do is shift gears and say, I reach in my pocket and say, [57:41.440 --> 57:48.640] anybody see any keys laying around? Man, I think I lost my keys. Oh, here they are. And then go [57:48.640 --> 57:53.280] and talk about something else. I've just done a pattern interruption and you're going to get [57:53.280 --> 57:56.880] amnesia for what I just said. That's what I just did to you without meaning to. [57:56.880 --> 58:03.040] Oh, thanks. You're really helping. Hey, it's the kind of guy I am. Over the break, maybe you can [58:03.040 --> 58:08.720] figure out what that was. If you can't, then we'll go to Don from New Mexico. I hope he's going to [58:08.720 --> 58:14.720] be glad to hear what I've done to Judge McBride. I'm having so much fun at the judge's expense. [58:15.520 --> 58:22.400] Randy Kelton, the rule of law radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. [58:22.400 --> 58:29.040] And go to Logos Radio Network. We have our fun drive going again this year. We're trying to get [58:29.040 --> 58:36.080] $10,000 so we can get upgrades and equipment. And $10,000 a year to run a whole radio station is [58:36.080 --> 58:41.840] a job change. And if everybody is into four or five bucks, we'd be in good shape. We'll be right back. [58:45.040 --> 58:47.440] Would you like to make more definite progress? [58:47.440 --> 58:54.240] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering [58:54.240 --> 58:59.680] a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help. The New Testament [58:59.680 --> 59:04.720] Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate [59:04.720 --> 59:09.760] translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the [59:09.760 --> 59:15.520] meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian [59:15.520 --> 59:21.120] Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of [59:21.120 --> 59:27.280] salvation growing in Christ and how to build up the church. To order your free New Testament [59:27.280 --> 59:34.080] Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free [59:34.080 --> 59:49.120] at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:50.880 --> 59:54.960] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [59:54.960 --> 01:00:08.400] The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily bulletins [01:00:08.400 --> 01:00:16.240] for the commodity market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of [01:00:16.240 --> 01:00:27.600] the alternatives. Markets for Wednesday the 18th of January 2017 are currently trading with gold [01:00:27.600 --> 01:00:37.440] at $1,211.45 an ounce, silver $17.23 an ounce, Texas crude $52.48 a barrel, and Bitcoin is [01:00:37.440 --> 01:00:50.720] currently sitting at about $878 U.S. currency. Today in history, the year 2005, the Airbus A380, [01:00:50.720 --> 01:00:55.840] the world's largest commercial jet to date, is unveiled at its ceremony in Toulouse, France. [01:00:55.840 --> 01:01:01.360] It has roughly 6,000 square feet of usable floor space, can seat up to 853 people in an [01:01:01.360 --> 01:01:07.680] all-economy class, and has a flight range of roughly 8,500 nautical miles. The Airbus A380 [01:01:07.680 --> 01:01:13.120] didn't get its first commercial flight until later that year in April, but it was unveiled today [01:01:13.120 --> 01:01:22.160] in history. In recent use, President Obama announced his exercise of clemency in commuting [01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:27.520] the sentence of Chelsea, formerly Bradley Manning. Manning had been arrested in 2010 after being [01:01:27.520 --> 01:01:32.320] outed by former hacker Adrian Lammo for being the main WikiLeaks source on the hundreds of [01:01:32.320 --> 01:01:37.520] thousands of sensitive U.S. government documents filed them, which included Cablegate and collateral [01:01:37.520 --> 01:01:44.560] murder. 39 minutes of classified gunsight footage in 2010 in Iraq, which shows two USAH-64 Apache [01:01:44.560 --> 01:01:50.080] helicopters indiscriminately shooting and killing unarmed civilians, including two Iraqi war [01:01:50.080 --> 01:01:55.680] correspondents working for Reuters. Manning was held in virtual solitary confinement for 23 hours [01:01:55.680 --> 01:02:00.800] a day at a Marine Corps brig, and sometimes even stripped completely naked. In 2013, he was [01:02:00.800 --> 01:02:06.000] sentenced in a military tribunal to 35 years in prison with the possibility of parole in the eighth [01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:11.440] year and dishonorably discharged from the Army. As a result of Obama's pardon, Manning will be free [01:02:11.440 --> 01:02:16.400] in May. To add a twist to all this, Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, tweeted last week via [01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:21.760] WikiLeaks' Twitter account that, quote, if Obama grants Manning clemency, Assange will agree to [01:02:21.760 --> 01:02:27.600] U.S. extradition despite clear unconstitutionality of the Department of Justice case. Assange has [01:02:27.600 --> 01:02:32.720] spent over four years in hideout at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Melinda Taylor, a member of [01:02:32.720 --> 01:02:38.240] Mr. Assange's legal team, recently stated to the press that everything that he has said he's standing [01:02:38.240 --> 01:02:43.920] by. The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors and even contributors. See if the product [01:02:43.920 --> 01:02:48.800] or service you like to advertise with us or even want to write articles and read for us, feel free [01:02:48.800 --> 01:02:58.000] to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for January 18th, 2017. [01:02:58.000 --> 01:03:14.000] It's all according to the will of the Almighty. I read his book and he said, [01:03:16.000 --> 01:03:21.440] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, the ruler of our radio, and we're talking to Scott. [01:03:21.440 --> 01:03:29.520] Scott, did you remember what it was you were going to ask me? Negative, so I'll just say goodbye [01:03:29.520 --> 01:03:37.440] and y'all have fun. Okay, thank you, Scott. Okay, now we're going to go to Don in New Mexico. Hello, [01:03:37.440 --> 01:03:46.480] Don. Hey, Randy, how you doing? I am following your prescription. You're following mine and I'm [01:03:46.480 --> 01:03:54.960] following yours. I made up a criminal complaint against Judge McBride. I called the FBI [01:03:56.320 --> 01:04:03.920] and talked to some woman and asked her if she was an FBI agent. She said no. [01:04:05.760 --> 01:04:13.760] I said, Are you an attorney? And she said, I just do intake. Well, I may need an attorney [01:04:13.760 --> 01:04:18.720] so that I have someone who can understand the technical nature of the complaint I'm going to [01:04:18.720 --> 01:04:26.000] bring. Well, I did intake. Well, who are you? What's your name? We're not allowed to reveal our [01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:38.000] identity. Oh, so I'm talking to the secret police, am I? She wound up hanging up on me. I explained [01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:46.640] the issue and she didn't understand it. Yeah. I re-explained 18 U.S. Code 242 and she's in [01:04:46.640 --> 01:04:52.240] the section where you file complaints against public officials and she pretends like she [01:04:52.240 --> 01:05:02.960] don't understand it. Then terminates the call. Oh, well, we'll see how that works. So I will [01:05:02.960 --> 01:05:10.640] I will put in a request for the, you know, they warned me that this conversation was being [01:05:10.640 --> 01:05:18.240] recorded for quality control purposes. So I'm going to ask for that tape. [01:05:21.200 --> 01:05:28.080] I've had this before. Deborah and I were in Philadelphia and I went to the FBI [01:05:28.080 --> 01:05:36.720] with a accusation I had received from a woman in jail in Bexar County who witnessed a grisly murder [01:05:36.720 --> 01:05:45.120] by the guards. And I went to, they had a little window and they had an agent behind the window [01:05:46.320 --> 01:05:55.040] and told him that I was there to file complaints against all the U.S. magistrates. It's kind of a [01:05:55.040 --> 01:06:00.640] kind of a long story with a scam they were pulling where the feds would go in and tell the local [01:06:00.640 --> 01:06:06.800] police that they had a warrant to search and seize and they need the police to run to security. [01:06:06.800 --> 01:06:10.240] So the police would come out, drag you out of your house at two o'clock in the morning [01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:15.360] and then the feds would go in, steal whatever they wanted, then leave and disappear. [01:06:17.280 --> 01:06:20.960] No prosecution, no nothing. They'd just steal everything you got and leave. [01:06:20.960 --> 01:06:28.080] And I was trying to short-circuit that. And the agent asked me if I had ever filed a [01:06:28.880 --> 01:06:35.680] complaint with the FBI before. I said, well, I tried to, but I couldn't get it filed. He said, [01:06:35.680 --> 01:06:39.440] well, what was the complaint? I told him it was a grisly murder by jail guards. [01:06:40.320 --> 01:06:47.200] Now I got his attention, his eyes lit up. He said, well, you can file that complaint with me. [01:06:47.200 --> 01:06:55.200] I said, well, who are you? And he kind of sat back in his charity. You could tell it, it [01:06:56.240 --> 01:07:01.200] bothered him, but he said, well, we're not allowed to identify ourselves. [01:07:03.200 --> 01:07:10.880] You're not allowed to identify yourself. So what do I call you? See, he had a big, [01:07:10.880 --> 01:07:17.840] a garish blue tie on. So what do I call you? Secret agent blue tie? [01:07:19.680 --> 01:07:26.400] Debra almost fell out in the floor and the guy was mortified. He's a 26, 27, young guy [01:07:27.200 --> 01:07:35.680] and clearly he was mortified. And I told him there is absolutely no way on earth. I'm going to give [01:07:35.680 --> 01:07:42.000] this complaint to a secret agent. That is not going to happen. I'm going to know who gets it. [01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:53.280] And your tool gives me exactly what I need. So I made up a complaint against a federal judge, [01:07:53.280 --> 01:08:04.240] John McBride, the one I lovingly refer to as the speaker. I, I filed a complaint with the FBI, [01:08:04.240 --> 01:08:10.480] I filed a petition for declaratory judgment with the state in the form of a quiet title action. [01:08:11.840 --> 01:08:17.440] Wells Fargo promptly removed it to the federal court along with a motion to [01:08:17.440 --> 01:08:23.760] dismiss for failure of state of claim on which a claim can be had. I promptly filed a challenge [01:08:23.760 --> 01:08:31.600] to subject matter jurisdiction. The opposition did not respond to my subject matter jurisdiction [01:08:31.600 --> 01:08:37.760] challenge. And the day I non-suited Judge McBride dismissed with prejudice. [01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:45.600] I non-suited because the lawyer for Wells Fargo said this case should be dismissed because [01:08:46.560 --> 01:08:55.040] Wells Fargo was not the lender. Say what? They're trying to foreclose and they testify in court [01:08:55.040 --> 01:09:00.080] they're not the lender. So I non-suited right away so they couldn't fix the error and made [01:09:00.080 --> 01:09:05.760] it collateral estoppel. The same day I non-suited Judge McBride dismissed with prejudice [01:09:07.120 --> 01:09:10.080] for failure to state a claim of which recovery can be had. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.880] It's a petition for declaratory judgment. There is no recovery. [01:09:19.200 --> 01:09:26.240] Got it. And this is not a complex legal argument. This is really clear. [01:09:26.240 --> 01:09:34.480] So when I got the dismissal I was just dancing around. This is a Christmas present. [01:09:35.760 --> 01:09:42.960] So I sent it to the SAC in Dallas. What did he violate? [01:09:45.680 --> 01:09:54.240] 18 U.S. Code 242 in that. Oh okay. Yeah he exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not have. [01:09:54.240 --> 01:09:59.120] There was an unanswered challenge to subject matter jurisdiction before the court. [01:10:00.560 --> 01:10:08.560] Instead of filing a motion to remand I challenged subject matter jurisdiction because the 2011 [01:10:08.560 --> 01:10:18.560] Venue and Removal Clarification Act says that while a suit, an action with state and federal [01:10:18.560 --> 01:10:26.720] and federal issues can be removed to the federal court, the state issues must be severed and remanded. [01:10:28.480 --> 01:10:35.120] That tells me they don't have, the federal court does not have subject matter jurisdiction [01:10:35.760 --> 01:10:45.200] to hear state issues. That was exactly the purpose of the 2011 Venue and Removal [01:10:45.200 --> 01:10:53.280] Clarification Act is to clear up a dispute between the circuits. One circuit said you can hear the [01:10:53.280 --> 01:10:59.760] state issues under judicial economy. Other circuits said no you can't it's an undue [01:10:59.760 --> 01:11:06.000] preemption of state law. The legislature chimed in and said yes it's an undue preemption you can't [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:16.640] hear state issues. Boom changed 200 years of law. That's the Texas legislature? Yes. Yeah. So I'm [01:11:16.640 --> 01:11:23.200] sorry no that's the federal legislature this is federal law. Oh okay. Oh they have to sever and [01:11:23.200 --> 01:11:28.480] remand. Well he that tells me he didn't have subject matter jurisdiction so I hit him with a [01:11:28.480 --> 01:11:36.960] subject matter jurisdiction challenge. I have no doubt that the judge never asked. It just it was [01:11:36.960 --> 01:11:44.240] a pro se filing he dismissed with prejudice. This is a third one for me that he for me partially [01:11:44.240 --> 01:11:51.040] that he has dismissed with prejudice. Same suit he saw my name on it saw it was the same suit [01:11:51.040 --> 01:12:01.040] dismissed it with prejudice. Well this one wasn't the same. Anyway so I sent it to the SAC if you [01:12:01.040 --> 01:12:09.120] know the routine the SAC is going to trash it then I may get a call from the SAC but I doubt it. [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:18.800] The SAC is special agent in charge for those who don't know every FBI office has a special agent [01:12:18.800 --> 01:12:25.200] in charge. So say it directly to him my family. Oh the when I call the FBI they wouldn't tell me [01:12:25.200 --> 01:12:32.320] who anybody was. Total secret police. They wouldn't tell you what? You're breaking up a little bit. [01:12:33.040 --> 01:12:41.280] Okay when I call the FBI they wouldn't tell me who anyone was. I ask who's the SAC we can't identify [01:12:41.280 --> 01:12:50.480] any employees. So they're playing secret police. So that'll work. So I looked on the internet [01:12:50.480 --> 01:12:57.040] found the SAC found an article where he was appointed. Right. So I sent it to him [01:12:58.720 --> 01:13:04.800] and he's not going to do anything with it. Then I will take a complaint against him [01:13:04.800 --> 01:13:13.920] for failing to act under 535, 28 U.S. Code 535 and send that to the U.S. Attorney. [01:13:15.920 --> 01:13:19.840] And when he fails to act then I go straight to D.C. [01:13:21.120 --> 01:13:24.480] To the U.S. Attorney in D.C. or straight to the Attorney General? [01:13:24.480 --> 01:13:33.360] The Attorney General. Okay. I go straight to the Attorney General because the way I read 535 [01:13:33.360 --> 01:13:42.480] 535 just because the U.S. Attorney is the prosecutor I don't see anything in there [01:13:42.480 --> 01:13:49.280] that excludes the prosecutor from that requirement. No that's right. [01:13:52.240 --> 01:14:00.080] He thinks he has discretion. Well maybe he does. But as to notify the Attorney General he has no [01:14:00.080 --> 01:14:06.720] discretion. So that's perfect. That allowed me to sting him. Okay. Okay. Enough of my stuff. [01:14:07.760 --> 01:14:13.600] The SAIC here blew off my complaint and I went ahead and filed a complaint against him with the [01:14:13.600 --> 01:14:19.360] U.S. Attorney which they got on January 4th and today I sent out a letter to the Attorney [01:14:19.360 --> 01:14:24.960] General asking if they knew anything about this complaint and so I'm that's kind of where that [01:14:24.960 --> 01:14:32.320] one stands. Oh good you're a month or so ahead of me. Yeah and there's a new Attorney General [01:14:32.320 --> 01:14:42.480] stepping in I think on Monday. Oh perfect. Yeah. A new Attorney General and for the most part he [01:14:42.480 --> 01:14:51.600] has appointed people who are not mainstream politicians. So do you know who this new Attorney [01:14:51.600 --> 01:15:02.080] General is? Sessions right? Sessions. That sounds right. He is going to want to establish his [01:15:02.080 --> 01:15:10.240] position. Yeah during his confirmation hearing he was talking up the rule of law. Oh good. [01:15:13.120 --> 01:15:17.200] When I got all of the highest judges in Texas put in front of a grand jury [01:15:17.200 --> 01:15:22.400] I thought it was all the pressure I put on them and all of my eloquent oratory. [01:15:23.840 --> 01:15:28.800] There was none of that. None of that had none of the stuff I did have anything to do with it. [01:15:30.320 --> 01:15:36.960] It was Ron Earl, 25 year prosecuting attorney. The guy that took out Tom DeLay illegally. [01:15:38.560 --> 01:15:44.720] Nobody ever accused Tom DeLay of a crime and Ron Earl took him out of office. Second highest [01:15:44.720 --> 01:15:52.400] political figure in the U.S. and local district attorney takes him out. He's not running for [01:15:52.400 --> 01:16:02.400] office again. All these judges are a Republican. All 15 of them and he's a Democrat. He used my [01:16:02.400 --> 01:16:09.920] complaint for cannon fodder. That's what you are Don. You're cannon fodder from the Attorney [01:16:09.920 --> 01:16:18.800] General. If he picks it up he will drop the sky on your local guy. Hang on. About to go to break [01:16:18.800 --> 01:16:26.960] Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. Our call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call during the break. [01:16:26.960 --> 01:16:34.720] Go have a look at Logos Radio Network. Check out our gun giveaway for this year and be a good time [01:16:34.720 --> 01:16:41.920] to purchase the ebook and that will give you four chances in the gun giveaway. Okay hang on we'll [01:16:41.920 --> 01:17:04.560] be right back. I love Logos. Without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:17:04.560 --> 01:17:09.200] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost [01:17:09.200 --> 01:17:14.080] without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer [01:17:14.080 --> 01:17:18.640] as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I [01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:24.800] spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos? Well I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything [01:17:24.800 --> 01:17:30.320] from Amazon you can help Logos in ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is [01:17:30.320 --> 01:17:38.080] clear your cookies. Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Pick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when [01:17:38.080 --> 01:17:44.720] you order anything from Amazon you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. [01:17:44.720 --> 01:17:50.720] Do you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes. [01:17:50.720 --> 01:17:56.800] Wow giving without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect. Thank you so much. [01:17:56.800 --> 01:18:03.680] We are welcome. Happy holidays Logos. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls [01:18:03.680 --> 01:18:09.680] letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael [01:18:09.680 --> 01:18:15.120] Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll [01:18:15.120 --> 01:18:20.400] get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights [01:18:20.400 --> 01:18:26.400] statute. What to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone [01:18:26.400 --> 01:18:31.040] calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables [01:18:31.040 --> 01:18:37.280] on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for [01:18:37.280 --> 01:18:42.880] how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information please [01:18:42.880 --> 01:18:48.800] visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at [01:18:48.800 --> 01:18:58.080] yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn [01:18:58.080 --> 01:19:06.480] how to stop debt collectors now. This is the Logos Radio Net. [01:19:15.280 --> 01:19:16.880] Ain't gonna blame me. [01:19:20.880 --> 01:19:22.080] Don't blame me. [01:19:22.080 --> 01:19:34.560] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old thing. [01:19:34.560 --> 01:19:42.960] Okay, we are back. We're in Kelton in the Rule of Law Radio on this Friday the 20th day of January [01:19:42.960 --> 01:19:49.440] 2017 and we're talking to Don in New Mexico. Okay, Don, when we went out last time you were [01:19:49.440 --> 01:19:59.680] getting a lot of background knowledge. Yeah, sounds a little better to me. You're not breaking [01:19:59.680 --> 01:20:10.000] up as much. Okay, good, good. Okay, now you're moving on. You're getting ready to move on the [01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:23.120] Attorney General. Have you heard anything from the IRS since you started this? Nothing new, nothing [01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:30.960] really since the end of December. Okay, that's only a month so that's not not long enough to [01:20:30.960 --> 01:20:40.080] tell if this has backed them off. But your complaint, your primary complaint was that, okay, [01:20:40.080 --> 01:20:46.240] let me let me back up. Bring this back up to speed. What did you file against the SAC [01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:51.840] or did you just file against an agent? [01:20:51.840 --> 01:21:02.400] Well, I sent a complaint to the FBI on the supervisor here basically for, [01:21:03.680 --> 01:21:15.760] what is it, 18 USC 242. Okay, supervisor, the IRS supervisor. Right, and, you know, nothing's [01:21:15.760 --> 01:21:23.120] happened with that. So I went ahead and did a complaint against the SAC over here of the FBI [01:21:23.120 --> 01:21:30.240] and sent that to the US Attorney. And I'm waiting, you know, they got that on January 4th and I'm, [01:21:30.240 --> 01:21:34.080] I've been waiting to hear something and I haven't heard a word. So I'm figuring they just buried it. [01:21:36.320 --> 01:21:43.040] And so now I'm, I sent a letter today out to the Attorney General's office asking if they had any [01:21:43.040 --> 01:21:49.680] information about that complaint, what the status was. And then I'm going to proceed from there and [01:21:49.680 --> 01:21:56.560] I guess when I don't hear anything back. Another couple of weeks. Yeah, I'm going to do a criminal [01:21:56.560 --> 01:22:04.640] complaint against the US Attorney and send that to the Attorney General. Right. That I was thinking [01:22:04.640 --> 01:22:13.200] as you were talking, a criminal complaint against the attorney, filed with the Attorney General. [01:22:13.200 --> 01:22:24.000] I need to look closely at the Attorney General's charter. Okay. Exactly what is his duty? [01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:34.000] Is he effectively the main US Attorney for the country? And I believe he is. [01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:44.000] I believe so too. I think that's in 535. It talks about the Attorney General. [01:22:46.800 --> 01:22:48.800] But I can look at that stuff again. [01:22:48.800 --> 01:22:57.520] I need to look at it and see if we can find some case law on it so that when we get to the Attorney [01:22:57.520 --> 01:23:08.240] General, we can dictate his behavior to him before some of his underling munchkins come and try to [01:23:08.240 --> 01:23:21.600] feed him a bunch of crapola. So we want all of our case law, where we make the complaint and show [01:23:21.600 --> 01:23:31.600] why he's the right one to make the complaint to. So that when he looks for input, we already have [01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:36.400] this law in front of them and his people can't lie to him, which they are certainly pulling. [01:23:36.400 --> 01:23:41.440] But if I'm filing a complaint because the US Attorney didn't notify him that there was a [01:23:41.440 --> 01:23:45.600] complaint against a government employee, who else would I send it to? [01:23:47.360 --> 01:23:57.680] Well, grand jury or another US Attorney or a district judge. This is why I'm thinking [01:23:57.680 --> 01:24:09.120] we need something that points directly at the US Attorney. I'm sorry, the Attorney General, [01:24:10.320 --> 01:24:19.120] showing that he has specific authority to enforce this requirement. Because he may not. [01:24:19.120 --> 01:24:21.520] That's Attorney, right? I mean, that's basically what he is. [01:24:21.520 --> 01:24:30.400] Yeah, you would think that he would be the one to adjudicate it, but I'm not sure. [01:24:31.440 --> 01:24:33.360] I'll do some looking into that too. [01:24:34.400 --> 01:24:42.560] But on the other hand, we might not want to tell him because if he doesn't do it right, [01:24:42.560 --> 01:24:52.640] then we file against the US Attorney General with a local grand jury and the US Attorney General, [01:24:52.640 --> 01:25:02.880] or you would file with the US Attorney in DC. And the new US Attorney is not going to be a happy camper. [01:25:02.880 --> 01:25:13.120] No, I would imagine so. And you know the kind of stuff that rolls [01:25:13.120 --> 01:25:19.280] downhill when the boss is not happy. Well, I'm trying to make him not so happy. [01:25:20.320 --> 01:25:28.800] At the end of the day, it doesn't have anything to do with law or only incidentally has to do with [01:25:28.800 --> 01:25:36.720] law. Your remedy incidentally has to do with law. Your remedy lies in the politics. [01:25:38.400 --> 01:25:44.480] Well, the grand jury felon got my letter on Tuesday. [01:25:46.400 --> 01:25:49.200] Oh, okay. Hold on back up. We didn't hear about that one. [01:25:50.080 --> 01:25:57.920] Yeah, I know this is I went ahead then. Since the US Attorney was ignoring complaints, [01:25:57.920 --> 01:26:01.840] I went ahead and in the FBI too. I went ahead and sent the grand jury foreman [01:26:02.800 --> 01:26:08.960] complaint against the IRS supervisor. And I sent it, I just heard restricted and the [01:26:08.960 --> 01:26:14.640] green card came back with a stamped or computerized signature. It's dotted. [01:26:15.440 --> 01:26:22.560] So it almost looks like it was run through and printed in the on the green card or it could be [01:26:22.560 --> 01:26:33.360] a stamp. But I've never kind of standard procedure. Yeah, this is okay. This is interesting. [01:26:34.800 --> 01:26:39.200] I don't know if it's the name of the grand jury foreman. You don't need that don't matter. [01:26:40.400 --> 01:26:45.840] Oh, grand is only going to be one. So if they can identify who it is, that's enough. [01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:55.280] But filed a complaint. Okay, you didn't file against the US Attorney with [01:26:56.240 --> 01:27:03.440] the grand jury, but the IRS supervisor. Yeah, you filed against the IRS supervisor [01:27:03.440 --> 01:27:09.280] because the US Attorney wouldn't because the FBI wouldn't act on your complaint. [01:27:09.280 --> 01:27:15.280] And now you have a complaint against the US Attorney with the Attorney General. Oh, [01:27:15.280 --> 01:27:23.440] okay. You don't have that in yet. Right. I'm thinking, how do we really compromise the US [01:27:23.440 --> 01:27:34.400] Attorney? When I do mine, I filed with the SAC and when he doesn't respond, I'm going to file with [01:27:34.400 --> 01:27:45.920] the US Attorney. And I'm going to file with the US Attorney so that when I do file with the foreman [01:27:45.920 --> 01:27:55.040] of the grand jury, I have the US Attorney compromised. I'll contact the Attorney General. [01:27:55.040 --> 01:28:05.040] And when I file, I want to research the Attorney General, see what his prosecutorial authority is. [01:28:07.440 --> 01:28:12.960] And in either case, I'll file with him and the local grand jury at the same time. [01:28:15.040 --> 01:28:20.000] Because I want the US Attorney to get a call from the Attorney General's office. [01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:26.160] And I also want him to get a criminal complaint to the foreman of the grand jury. Now, he's not [01:28:26.160 --> 01:28:34.080] going to let that foreman open it. He's going to open it. And when he opens it, it's a criminal [01:28:34.080 --> 01:28:44.720] complaint against him. Oops. That demonstrates that that will demonstrate to him the problem with him [01:28:44.720 --> 01:28:54.240] opening mail directed to somebody else. So I'm going to assume that he's intercepted the mail. [01:28:55.280 --> 01:29:05.040] Well, almost certainly, he will notify you that if you send anything else to the grand jury, [01:29:05.040 --> 01:29:11.760] he will charge you with witness tampering. That's what they generally do. [01:29:11.760 --> 01:29:20.800] Okay. And the reason I developed this strategy is that's exactly what they did in Fort Lauderdale, [01:29:20.800 --> 01:29:27.600] Florida, when we filed against an IRS agent there. And by the way, we got that one fired. [01:29:29.680 --> 01:29:35.600] But he threatened me with the jury tampering and I threatened him with witness tampering, [01:29:35.600 --> 01:29:43.200] told him, take your best shot, bubba. Then they fired the agent. Hang on, Randy Kelton, [01:29:43.200 --> 01:29:50.160] the rule of law radio. I called it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [01:29:59.040 --> 01:30:02.880] The next time the doctor asks you how you feel, ask him the same question. [01:30:02.880 --> 01:30:08.640] Why? New research shows unhappy doctors perform differently than their contented counterparts. [01:30:08.640 --> 01:30:33.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht with details in a moment. [01:30:38.640 --> 01:30:49.440] We've long suspected it and now a new study confirms it. A doctor's mood impacts their [01:30:49.440 --> 01:30:54.800] professional behavior towards patients. A survey of nearly 200 Israeli physicians found [01:30:54.800 --> 01:31:00.160] that on bad mood days, doctors spent less time talking with patients, wrote more prescriptions, [01:31:00.160 --> 01:31:05.200] ordered more tests, and issued more referrals, often unnecessarily. All of this, of course, [01:31:05.200 --> 01:31:10.000] leads to higher healthcare costs. But when the doctors were in a good mood and felt less [01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.880] burnout, they consulted more with patients, diagnosed their conditions with fewer tests, [01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:20.400] and prescribed less expensive medicines. Let's see, less caregiver stress, less burnout, [01:31:20.400 --> 01:31:25.200] and better patient care. Sounds like just what the doctor ordered. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht [01:31:25.200 --> 01:31:28.480] for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:28.480 --> 01:31:36.880] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.880 --> 01:31:42.400] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded [01:31:42.400 --> 01:31:46.800] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.800 --> 01:31:50.880] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:53.280] I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction office. [01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:55.840] I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.840 --> 01:32:01.600] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.600 --> 01:32:05.200] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or [01:32:05.200 --> 01:32:09.120] wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with their [01:32:09.120 --> 01:32:13.760] chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, [01:32:13.760 --> 01:32:17.520] but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home [01:32:17.520 --> 01:32:21.760] Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:21.760 --> 01:32:26.720] And we accept Bitcoin. As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero [01:32:26.720 --> 01:32:31.520] complaints, you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof [01:32:31.520 --> 01:32:39.440] right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention [01:32:39.440 --> 01:32:44.800] the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help [01:32:44.800 --> 01:32:50.240] continue this programming. So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be [01:32:50.240 --> 01:32:57.920] locked in. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are [01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:01.600] based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:01.600 --> 01:33:18.080] Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:18.080 --> 01:33:33.040] Okay. We are back. Randy Kalkin, U of I Radio, talking to Don in New Mexico. [01:33:34.640 --> 01:33:40.400] Okay, Don. So how are we going to set up the U.S. Attorney? [01:33:40.400 --> 01:33:47.440] Well, I think once upon a time, you mentioned filing a complaint with the U.S. Postmaster. [01:33:48.880 --> 01:33:54.960] No, that might have been somebody else. Not the Postmaster, but we go back to the Postmaster with [01:33:54.960 --> 01:34:06.960] a complaint about the U.S. Attorney tampering with the mail. Right. And that was the idea. [01:34:06.960 --> 01:34:13.200] Yeah. I think they've kind of done away with the postal inspectors to some degree. [01:34:13.840 --> 01:34:18.320] So they may not be as available as they used to. I think they pushed that off to the FBI. [01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:25.200] But I saw something on that recently. Do I go back to the FBI? [01:34:25.840 --> 01:34:31.760] I think so. I saw something on it. At the time, I didn't have time to research it out, but [01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:37.760] it indicated that they had essentially eliminated the postal inspectors and moved that [01:34:39.040 --> 01:34:44.240] authority to the FBI. But I'll have to check that out to be sure. And it won't matter if we [01:34:44.240 --> 01:34:47.680] try to go to the postal inspectors and they're the wrong ones. They'll tell us who to go to. [01:34:48.960 --> 01:35:00.000] But because the U.S. Attorney always opens anything mailed to the grand jury. And after [01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:07.760] reading Scalia's dissertation or his opinion in I think his Montgomery case, [01:35:09.760 --> 01:35:16.880] where he says that once the court consecrates a grand jury, it essentially becomes a fourth [01:35:16.880 --> 01:35:25.200] branch of government. For the U.S. Attorney to intercept mail directed to a grand jury, [01:35:25.200 --> 01:35:34.720] I can't find anything giving him that authority. So if I'm going to have a U.S. Attorney [01:35:34.720 --> 01:35:41.840] intercepting mail, I want him to intercept something that he should absolutely never [01:35:41.840 --> 01:35:53.200] see or touch to complain against himself. So that's when he'll know you've set him up. [01:35:53.200 --> 01:36:00.720] And that's why I put that cover letter on there telling them the foreman that I have problems with [01:36:02.160 --> 01:36:08.000] U.S. Attorney's secreting complaints from grand jurors. So if he opens it, now he's standing [01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:14.080] there with a letter warning the foreman that he'll do just exactly what he did. [01:36:14.080 --> 01:36:21.440] And the complaints against him. Good luck with that, Bubba. [01:36:21.440 --> 01:36:25.680] If I don't hear anything from the grand juror, the foreman, [01:36:28.480 --> 01:36:31.680] maybe I'll just do another letter to the grand jury foreman at that point. [01:36:33.360 --> 01:36:42.240] That's generally what I do. The first one is a complaint against generally an IRS FBI agent [01:36:42.240 --> 01:36:50.080] or something. I want to stack my complaints so that I file against the first person and [01:36:50.080 --> 01:36:58.800] then I never file against him again, like your IRS agent. Then you file with the FBI agent. [01:36:58.800 --> 01:37:05.200] The next time you file, it's against the FBI agent for not acting on the complaint against the IRS. [01:37:05.200 --> 01:37:13.280] You file that with the grand jury. And then the grand jury, you don't hear anything back from it. [01:37:13.280 --> 01:37:20.160] So you presume that the U.S. Attorney intercepted it. You file another one with them against the [01:37:20.160 --> 01:37:24.960] U.S. Attorney. Now he knows he's been set up. Okay. [01:37:27.600 --> 01:37:32.880] That's the worst thing that can happen to them. It's when they look at that and say, [01:37:32.880 --> 01:37:37.760] this guy walked me right into this. Now he's got me. [01:37:40.720 --> 01:37:46.720] That would be a nice next step. Or sometimes the U.S. Attorney will be arrogant enough to call you [01:37:46.720 --> 01:37:55.040] like the guy in Florida. Yeah. I'll give them a couple of weeks to answer, to respond to it. [01:37:55.040 --> 01:38:01.440] They just got that on Tuesday. So the one in Florida would have been much better off just [01:38:01.440 --> 01:38:07.280] to keep his mouth shut and say nothing. He wanted to play hardball. [01:38:07.280 --> 01:38:16.240] In the meantime, the supervisor of the supervisor is getting complained about with the FBI in Los [01:38:16.240 --> 01:38:22.160] Angeles. That is wonderful. That's when the politics really starts. [01:38:22.160 --> 01:38:32.400] Okay, Don, keep us up to date. This is going to be an interesting case. And what happens to you [01:38:33.440 --> 01:38:38.960] will tell me how to make adjustments in mind. If they find a way to circum, [01:38:39.760 --> 01:38:45.120] short circuit yours, then I'll make adjustments to mine right behind it. [01:38:45.120 --> 01:38:53.040] And when they get complaints from separate entities, they're going to feel like they're under siege. [01:38:55.840 --> 01:39:01.520] And I hope they do. It's time. It's time. Okay. Thank you, Don. [01:39:03.840 --> 01:39:07.600] Now we're going to go to Charlene in New York. Hello, Charlene. [01:39:08.800 --> 01:39:11.200] Hi, Randy. And happy new year to you. [01:39:11.200 --> 01:39:18.000] Oh, you too. What do you have for us today? I had sent the email. It was a while back. [01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:22.960] It was back in December. But what I want to know, I'm just a little confused about something. So [01:39:22.960 --> 01:39:30.320] basically, a foreclosure lien has been filed against the property in the Supreme County [01:39:30.320 --> 01:39:37.440] Clerk's record, Department of Records. So my question is, we continue to receive mail [01:39:37.440 --> 01:39:44.800] about the mortgage interest rates going up and the current mortgage each month. So I'm just [01:39:44.800 --> 01:39:50.560] confused that does that continue to go up even if a property is in foreclosure and listed to be [01:39:51.040 --> 01:39:52.880] auctioned off? Yes. [01:39:52.880 --> 01:39:57.760] They continue to have mortgage rates going, interest rates like the mortgage is still being [01:39:57.760 --> 01:40:03.840] paid on or because we get these statements. And it's just really confusing. I'm like, okay, [01:40:03.840 --> 01:40:09.200] if the house is in foreclosure, they continue to send statements about interest rates and payments [01:40:09.200 --> 01:40:17.760] to. The contract doesn't cease until the foreclosure is adjudicated, until there's a final order. [01:40:19.120 --> 01:40:25.280] Have you answered the petition for foreclosure? [01:40:25.280 --> 01:40:36.240] No, I haven't received anything like that yet. No, no. They haven't filed suit in the state. [01:40:36.240 --> 01:40:44.800] You said they filed with the Supreme Court. Those who don't know, in New York, the Supreme Court [01:40:44.800 --> 01:40:50.240] is one of the lowest courts, not the high court. Oh, okay. I didn't know that. [01:40:50.240 --> 01:40:58.880] Okay. Yes. In most every other state, the Supreme Court is the highest court. New York's got that [01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:10.400] backwards. Okay. So what did they file with the Supreme Court? Foreclosure lien. That's what's [01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:20.560] saying, a lien for foreclosure against the property and for the property to be input an option. [01:41:20.560 --> 01:41:28.320] I think you may be misinterpreting what you're reading. I think they filed an action to enforce [01:41:28.320 --> 01:41:34.240] the lien. Okay. So does that mean that- [01:41:34.240 --> 01:41:41.440] You've got 20 days here. I think in New York, it may be 30 days to answer. If you don't answer, [01:41:41.440 --> 01:41:52.560] they could default judgment. Okay. I don't know how to follow up with it. [01:41:52.560 --> 01:41:56.720] If the proceedings are in the middle of the foreclosure or if they're just beginning, [01:41:56.720 --> 01:42:06.400] it's just really, I'm just sort of lost. You need a lawyer. You are going to run out [01:42:06.400 --> 01:42:13.280] of time really fast. If that is a petition to enforce a lien, because they would not file a lien [01:42:13.280 --> 01:42:25.280] with the courts in New York. The lien is filed with the county clerk. If they file a lien, [01:42:25.280 --> 01:42:32.320] if they file something with the court, then it's almost certainly a petition to enforce the lien. [01:42:34.720 --> 01:42:38.400] Petition for foreclosure. Okay. That's the difference. Okay. [01:42:39.360 --> 01:42:47.040] As I just found this information, it was through realtor advertisements stating about our house, [01:42:47.040 --> 01:42:53.520] the state that it's in. So it wasn't an actual petition form, but it was a realtor's information [01:42:53.520 --> 01:42:57.200] stating that they- Oh, okay. So you weren't served by the court? [01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:03.760] No, this wasn't by the court. I'm sorry. I should have clarified that. No, this was a realtor's [01:43:04.400 --> 01:43:12.480] advertisement information. You had sent me an email and I hadn't had time to look at it. I was [01:43:12.480 --> 01:43:23.920] looking for it. But if you weren't officially served, then you don't have a foreclosure yet. [01:43:23.920 --> 01:43:31.040] When you get one, make sure you check the court rules. I think in New York, you've got 30 days [01:43:31.040 --> 01:43:38.960] to respond, but you have to make sure because most states and the fed, it's the Monday after [01:43:38.960 --> 01:43:46.560] the 20th day from the date you received it. So you don't have as much time. If you don't get [01:43:46.560 --> 01:44:09.520] a response in, it's over quickly. Great. Okay. But since I have no idea what the action is. [01:44:17.200 --> 01:44:22.880] People have been confused about this plan for over 80 years and many still don't know what hemp is. [01:44:22.880 --> 01:44:28.800] So now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the [01:44:28.800 --> 01:44:34.720] same species. HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand [01:44:34.720 --> 01:44:40.080] that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. Remember hemp [01:44:40.080 --> 01:44:47.120] protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO and is loaded [01:44:47.120 --> 01:44:57.040] with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you [01:44:57.040 --> 01:45:05.760] only at hempUSA.org. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without [01:45:05.760 --> 01:45:12.160] an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand for CD course that will show [01:45:12.160 --> 01:45:19.680] you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.680 --> 01:45:24.960] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our [01:45:24.960 --> 01:45:31.600] step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [01:45:31.600 --> 01:45:37.840] with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what [01:45:37.840 --> 01:45:43.920] everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.920 --> 01:45:50.160] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:50.160 --> 01:45:56.960] pro se tactics and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [01:45:56.960 --> 01:46:02.160] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:18.160 --> 01:46:23.680] Okay, we are back. Lady Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. We're talking to Charlene in New York. [01:46:23.680 --> 01:46:28.720] On the break, I look at the email and all that is is a list of [01:46:30.960 --> 01:46:36.800] what they alleged that you owe. So it doesn't look like you're actually in foreclosure yet. [01:46:40.320 --> 01:46:46.720] Oh, okay. Okay, because basically it's just confusing based on those statements. They're [01:46:46.720 --> 01:46:52.240] sending it like we're actually paying mortgage rate in the house. It's not in the foreclosure, [01:46:52.240 --> 01:46:58.240] but they're still asking for the $2,000 a month towards a mortgage. [01:46:59.600 --> 01:47:03.280] Yeah, they're going to keep asking for that right up until the time [01:47:03.920 --> 01:47:10.720] they get an order from the court. Once they get a foreclosure order from the court, [01:47:10.720 --> 01:47:12.640] then the contract is terminated. [01:47:12.640 --> 01:47:20.640] Oh, all right. Okay. Thank you for clarifying that part. [01:47:23.040 --> 01:47:30.560] So my next question, because I know I had contacted you prior, but I don't know if [01:47:30.560 --> 01:47:37.280] on the air was the right time to mention it, but I remember you had sent an email [01:47:37.280 --> 01:47:44.320] in December based about your services in terms of the payments and what you've went over. [01:47:45.200 --> 01:47:50.800] I'm not going to be able to do that. I've got other business issues that's coming about [01:47:52.480 --> 01:47:55.280] that my time is too tied up now. [01:47:57.440 --> 01:48:04.640] I have a piece of equipment that I designed so 20 years ago, and I'm in the process of building the [01:48:04.640 --> 01:48:10.480] the production right now, and I'm hoping to launch it by February 1st, [01:48:12.720 --> 01:48:16.240] make a whole bunch of money, then I can help support this radio station. [01:48:19.520 --> 01:48:23.920] Oh, okay. So this is definitely not the place to talk about that. [01:48:26.080 --> 01:48:28.640] Right. On the air is not the proper... [01:48:29.840 --> 01:48:32.000] Just send me an email and I'll explain. [01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:38.160] Okay. Okay. Yes. Definitely. That's what I was definitely concerned that a private [01:48:39.520 --> 01:48:44.240] contact would be better. Okay. Thank you. [01:48:44.960 --> 01:48:52.160] Okay. Thank you, Ms. Charlene. Okay. Now we're going to go to Susan in Texas. Hello, Ms. Susan. [01:48:53.600 --> 01:48:54.720] Hi, Randy. How are you doing? [01:48:54.720 --> 01:49:04.560] I'm doing good. Okay. You sent me an email and it was a good issue to talk about on the air. [01:49:04.560 --> 01:49:07.600] Will you bring everybody up to speed on what your issue is? [01:49:11.520 --> 01:49:14.400] This is the best way I can think of approach it is... [01:49:15.840 --> 01:49:19.680] Wait a minute. I'm having a little trouble understanding you. Can you move the microphone [01:49:19.680 --> 01:49:25.680] down by your chin a little bit? Your voice is kind of distorting the mic. Is this better? [01:49:27.040 --> 01:49:29.040] A little bit. Kind of sounds like you're in a well. [01:49:32.640 --> 01:49:36.000] Are you on a computer or a cell phone? Cell phone. [01:49:37.040 --> 01:49:47.120] Okay. Then it's just a phone. Okay. Go ahead. Okay. My issue is with an [01:49:47.120 --> 01:49:55.440] assistant DA in Wichita County, John Gillespie. He went into... [01:49:56.720 --> 01:50:02.080] Oh, wait a minute. Hold on. What was his name again? Let's make sure we get it clear. [01:50:03.360 --> 01:50:06.880] John Gillespie. John Gillespie. Okay. [01:50:06.880 --> 01:50:19.520] He had pictures taken of a 25-year-old disabled woman, naked. [01:50:23.120 --> 01:50:26.400] Okay. You said she was the victim of assault? [01:50:26.400 --> 01:50:37.680] No. Yeah. I would say so. Yeah. No, no. What I'm trying to get at, how did the [01:50:38.640 --> 01:50:44.720] prosecutor come by these photos? Okay. Let me bring everybody up to speed. [01:50:46.560 --> 01:50:53.680] What Susan is claiming is that the prosecuting attorney has nude photos of a victim [01:50:53.680 --> 01:51:02.080] and she was disabled, so she was unable to give consent, and he made these nude photos public. [01:51:03.680 --> 01:51:09.440] And that's what her issue is right now. Am I correct in that? Did I get that right? [01:51:10.160 --> 01:51:17.920] Yeah. Exactly right. Okay. How did the prosecutor come by these photos? [01:51:17.920 --> 01:51:22.880] What I'm getting at, did the police take these photos, or were these photos evidence from some [01:51:22.880 --> 01:51:31.120] other crime? The sheriff's department took these photos, but apparently he was there at the scene [01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:40.160] when they took the photos. So this is someone who was a victim. The sheriff's department takes [01:51:40.160 --> 01:51:49.600] photos of, what are sheriff's deputies doing in proximity here? Were these male deputies or females? [01:51:51.600 --> 01:51:57.360] They were all male. In fact, there were 12 officers that ended up there in the house [01:51:58.080 --> 01:52:05.760] standing around for three hours, and nobody even had the decency to just put a blanket on them. [01:52:05.760 --> 01:52:10.800] And nobody even had the decency to just put a blanket over the woman. [01:52:13.120 --> 01:52:15.680] And they're standing around taking photos of her. [01:52:17.600 --> 01:52:20.400] They should all be charged with sexual assault. [01:52:22.160 --> 01:52:28.720] Okay. I agree. I don't want to know too much about the circumstance, but [01:52:28.720 --> 01:52:34.640] why was she unable to cover herself? [01:52:36.320 --> 01:52:41.760] I've known Ashley since she was born. She was covered as... [01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:51.200] No. What I'm getting at, was she disabled to the point that she was unable to cover herself, [01:52:51.200 --> 01:52:55.360] or was she deprived of something to cover herself with? [01:52:55.360 --> 01:53:07.280] She threw it off of herself. She was dressed and had blankets that morning, but after [01:53:07.280 --> 01:53:13.840] the sheriff's department came in and is legally blind, so she had no idea what was going on, [01:53:14.800 --> 01:53:21.760] she could hear her mother in the other room. And she was furious that, you know, [01:53:21.760 --> 01:53:27.040] why isn't mom coming and taking care of me like she's done every day for the last 25 years? [01:53:31.040 --> 01:53:39.680] Okay. I'm trying to... I'm thinking I'm a sheriff's deputy or I'm a prosecuting attorney. [01:53:40.400 --> 01:53:45.120] How am I going to explain my actions? How am I going to explain a way? [01:53:45.120 --> 01:53:50.640] What argument would a sheriff's deputy have for being in that room with her [01:53:51.840 --> 01:54:02.160] naked and not covering her up? Or leaving the room if she wasn't a suspect leaving the room? [01:54:05.520 --> 01:54:10.000] I can't think of an excuse that that can come up with. [01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:18.000] Okay. Did this have to do with an assault against this woman [01:54:20.400 --> 01:54:24.480] by a third party? That was the only assault up until that time. [01:54:25.440 --> 01:54:29.440] No, wait, you're being really, really cryptic to the point that I have... [01:54:29.440 --> 01:54:35.040] I don't even know how to evaluate this. Is she the victim because she was there [01:54:35.040 --> 01:54:40.640] and they saw her naked? Or was she victim when they got there? [01:54:44.320 --> 01:54:46.320] When did she become the victim? [01:54:49.040 --> 01:54:54.240] That's really hard to say. What happened is they came to the house [01:54:55.360 --> 01:54:59.520] for a bench warrant for somebody that didn't even live at the house. [01:54:59.520 --> 01:55:04.960] And they decided to come into the house in search of her. [01:55:04.960 --> 01:55:16.480] Oh, okay. That's what we need. So, what did they... Do you know if there was any [01:55:17.280 --> 01:55:27.680] thing in the warrant or any statements that would give you an explanation of what was going on? [01:55:27.680 --> 01:55:33.440] That would give these deputies probable cause to believe [01:55:33.440 --> 01:55:36.240] that the person named in the warrant was in the house. [01:55:39.840 --> 01:55:44.560] Well, other than the fact that they had him in custody by the time that they went into her room. [01:55:46.720 --> 01:55:52.320] Oh, come on. You give me trouble getting information out. So, [01:55:52.320 --> 01:56:00.320] was he in the house when they entered? No, he wasn't when they entered. [01:56:00.320 --> 01:56:05.840] So, what was their reason for entering the house? They had none. [01:56:07.840 --> 01:56:12.960] Oh, no. They had a... Okay, no, no. They had a bench warrant. [01:56:12.960 --> 01:56:20.320] I'm not talking about your argument against them. I'm trying to get... [01:56:20.320 --> 01:56:27.680] I'm trying to get the facts of the case. You have a policeman out here who's about to enter [01:56:27.680 --> 01:56:37.520] a private residence. That in law is a big deal. And he's got a gun on his hip. That makes it an [01:56:37.520 --> 01:56:45.920] even bigger deal. So, when he walks in that door, he's going to have an excuse. What was his excuse? [01:56:45.920 --> 01:56:52.720] What they're going to say is that Brandon gave them permission to enter the house. [01:56:58.880 --> 01:57:02.480] So, they arrested this guy and just randomly came to this house? [01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:11.440] Pretty much. Apparently, Mickey had at one time put it on his [01:57:11.440 --> 01:57:15.600] personal information, maybe. Wait a minute. This is not... [01:57:16.400 --> 01:57:19.440] I'm using up a lot of time here and this is not making any sense. [01:57:21.200 --> 01:57:28.960] Can you send me a timeline, an email? I can send you the case. [01:57:31.520 --> 01:57:35.840] Wait, say that again? I can send you the case. The [01:57:35.840 --> 01:57:43.040] District Attorney published his case on the District Attorney's, District and County Attorney's [01:57:43.040 --> 01:57:47.760] website. Are these tapes of her nude? [01:57:51.120 --> 01:57:54.560] If it is, I don't want to see those. There's no tapes. There's just photographs. [01:57:55.600 --> 01:58:01.200] I don't need the tapes. I need the facts of the case. [01:58:01.200 --> 01:58:09.280] Okay. Give me a timeline. This happened, this happened, this happened, this happened, without [01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:18.880] legal argument or explanation. Just what happened and the time sequence in which it happened. [01:58:19.440 --> 01:58:27.040] Then we can talk. Then I can ask intelligent questions. First, I'm trying to determine [01:58:27.040 --> 01:58:35.200] how the police had probable cause to enter a private residence displaying deadly weapons. [01:58:36.640 --> 01:58:40.320] In this country, that's a big deal. Hang on. We'll be right back. [01:58:40.320 --> 01:58:47.680] Randy Kelton, Rue of La Radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [01:58:49.200 --> 01:58:54.720] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [01:58:54.720 --> 01:59:00.000] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying [01:59:00.000 --> 01:59:04.800] the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [01:59:05.760 --> 01:59:12.000] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:18.080] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound [01:59:18.080 --> 01:59:23.280] passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the [01:59:23.280 --> 01:59:28.720] word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give [01:59:28.720 --> 01:59:34.000] you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study [01:59:34.000 --> 01:59:44.000] Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at [01:59:44.000 --> 01:59:54.240] freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [01:59:54.240 --> 02:00:14.640] LogosRadioNetwork.com.