[00:00.000 --> 00:10.000]  You're listening to the Liberty Beats, your daily source for Liberty News and activist
[00:10.000 --> 00:15.560]  updates online at thelibertybeats.com.
[00:15.560 --> 00:20.200]  John Bush here with your Liberty Beats for February 15, 2013.
[00:20.200 --> 00:27.760]  Gold opened today at $1,642, silver at $30.87 and Bitcoin is trading at $26.50.
[00:27.760 --> 00:34.400]  Today's edition of the Liberty Beats is sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works, self-defense training,
[00:34.400 --> 00:36.920]  CHL classes and firearm sales.
[00:36.920 --> 00:42.800]  Online at centraltexasgunworks.com and now the news.
[00:42.800 --> 00:47.060]  Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked the nomination of former GOP Senator Chuck Hagel
[00:47.060 --> 00:51.320]  as the nation's next defense secretary over unrelated questions about President Barack
[00:51.320 --> 00:56.560]  Obama's actions in the aftermath of the deadly raid on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya.
[00:56.560 --> 01:00.320]  Democrats accused Republicans of playing politics with national security during wartime
[01:00.320 --> 01:04.520]  and Democrats vowed to revive the nomination after Congress's week-long break.
[01:04.520 --> 01:09.560]  By 58-40, with one abstention, the Senate fell short of the 60-vote threshold required
[01:09.560 --> 01:13.840]  to advance Hagel's nomination to a final up-or-down vote on his confirmation.
[01:13.840 --> 01:18.040]  Four Republicans voted with Democrats to end debate and proceed to a final vote.
[01:18.040 --> 01:21.840]  A food fight quickly turned into a brawl involving hundreds of students at a Minneapolis high
[01:21.840 --> 01:26.720]  school on Thursday, forcing police to use chemical spray to break up the melee.
[01:26.720 --> 01:30.160]  Four people were taken to a hospital with minor injuries, including a staff member
[01:30.160 --> 01:33.520]  who was hit in the head with a bottle according to the school and police.
[01:33.520 --> 01:37.000]  The 15-minute brackets broke out during lunchtime at South High School.
[01:37.000 --> 01:40.680]  No weapons were used, but about 200 to 300 students were involved.
[01:40.680 --> 01:45.560]  Minneapolis police spokesman Sergeant Bill Palmer said, and in gun control news, state
[01:45.560 --> 01:50.560]  legislatures across the country are making a push to restrict citizens' access to firearms.
[01:50.560 --> 01:54.800]  Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which returned law-abiding firearm owners
[01:54.800 --> 01:55.800]  into criminals.
[01:55.800 --> 01:59.920]  They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
[01:59.920 --> 02:03.560]  According to the proposed law, any person who prior to the effective date of this law was
[02:03.560 --> 02:08.200]  legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have 90 days
[02:08.200 --> 02:12.920]  from such effective date to comply with the law without being subject to prosecution.
[02:12.920 --> 02:18.640]  Washington State Senator Ed Murray and Jane Cole Wells, as well as Adam Klein, all Democrats
[02:18.640 --> 02:22.520]  have introduced new gun control legislation that goes far above and beyond what anyone
[02:22.520 --> 02:24.600]  would consider a simple sales ban.
[02:24.600 --> 02:30.600]  The bill, SB 5737, proposes the banning the sale of assault weapons according to the legislation
[02:30.600 --> 02:35.520]  an assault weapon is any semi-automatic pistol, pump-action rifle, or shotgun that can accept
[02:35.520 --> 02:41.240]  detachable magazines with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
[02:41.240 --> 02:46.120]  The Liberty Beat is sponsored in part by Grave New Books, your Austin supplier of one-world
[02:46.120 --> 02:52.800]  way protein powder, online at GraveNewBooksStore.com, and by Voice and Exit, March 9th in Austin,
[02:52.800 --> 02:57.480]  Voice and Exit as a conference exploring social entrepreneurship and radical community.
[02:57.480 --> 03:27.320]  Take its information at voiceandexit.com.
[03:27.480 --> 03:45.240]  Okay, hello all, this is Randy Kelton with you on this Friday night, February the 15th.
[03:45.240 --> 03:54.120]  I can't believe we're a month and a half into the new year already, and I know I get some
[03:54.120 --> 03:59.720]  flat sometimes for talking about things other than law, but there was an event in the news
[03:59.720 --> 04:05.160]  today I've found most compelling.
[04:05.160 --> 04:14.560]  Largest media to strike the earth in 100 years landed in Russia, actually it didn't land
[04:14.560 --> 04:15.560]  in Russia.
[04:15.560 --> 04:24.680]  And it's interesting that this particular meteor had the same or similar characteristics
[04:24.680 --> 04:31.880]  to one that hit Russia the last time we had a large meteor strike, and there was a movie
[04:31.880 --> 04:41.880]  made about it called A Fire Came By, and it's called the Tunguska incident, and the ground
[04:41.880 --> 04:54.000]  around the point of the explosion or remarkable similarities to a nuclear blast, where the
[04:54.000 --> 05:01.440]  trees are stripped clean, still standing under ground zero, and everything was pushed away
[05:01.440 --> 05:03.960]  as it moved out from ground zero.
[05:03.960 --> 05:15.320]  This was early in the last century, 1907, and here we are just over 100 years later,
[05:15.320 --> 05:23.360]  we have another one that comes into the atmosphere and detonates above ground just like the one
[05:23.360 --> 05:24.360]  in Tunguska.
[05:24.360 --> 05:30.840]  I know there's a lot of, my call screeners telling me there's a lot of stuff out there
[05:30.840 --> 05:38.080]  about Russia shooting something down and all that blah blah blah, yada yada, kind of trash
[05:38.080 --> 05:44.080]  to CIA starts putting out there right away to discredit anybody who would talk about the
[05:44.080 --> 05:50.360]  stuff they're really doing, but the thing that concerned me the most about this incident
[05:50.360 --> 06:01.080]  was that there was another asteroid, apparently a twin to this one, that passed from 500 miles
[06:01.080 --> 06:11.560]  or so under one of our 500 to 5000 miles below one of our geostationary satellites.
[06:11.560 --> 06:19.640]  That was very close, so we had two large meteors come through at the same time.
[06:19.640 --> 06:26.440]  If those two were part of the same year and had separated, had they not, we could have
[06:26.440 --> 06:35.640]  had a major event, and as events go, they're not terribly uncommon.
[06:35.640 --> 06:46.080]  It seems like the history of life on Earth is punctuated with major events of this nature,
[06:46.080 --> 06:54.440]  and I realize that we spend most of our lives and never see one of these events, but they
[06:54.440 --> 07:06.800]  do happen, and in the timeframe of geological history, these things pretty close together.
[07:06.800 --> 07:18.760]  Actually I was looking at this supposed global warming that we're experiencing, it's all
[07:18.760 --> 07:26.080]  horse manure, 12,600 years ago.
[07:26.080 --> 07:36.760]  There were mastodons here in the United States, horses were 30 species of horse here.
[07:36.760 --> 07:44.920]  The horse originated in North America, and then 12,600 years ago, along with the Clovis
[07:44.920 --> 07:50.600]  people, if you've ever heard of Clovis points, the people who produced those Clovis points
[07:50.600 --> 07:56.280]  12,600 years ago vanished.
[07:56.280 --> 08:04.200]  The mastodon vanished, the saber-toothed tiger vanished, and 30 major species vanished
[08:04.200 --> 08:09.560]  from this part of the planet, 12,600 years ago.
[08:09.560 --> 08:16.800]  Well they call it the younger Dias, a dryus, as dryus is over an arctic plant, the name
[08:16.800 --> 08:27.080]  of the plant, but 12,600 years ago an event occurred, and temperature precipitously dropped
[08:27.080 --> 08:29.240]  about 50 degrees.
[08:29.240 --> 08:38.640]  And then it gradually came back up, but in this period there was a major disruption of
[08:38.640 --> 08:45.120]  the deep ocean currents, and it caused a minor ice age.
[08:45.120 --> 08:54.040]  It took the temperatures a thousand years to re-establish themselves, and looking at
[08:54.040 --> 09:01.640]  the maps, the temperatures established themselves about 7 degrees above what the normal was prior
[09:01.640 --> 09:04.520]  to this time.
[09:04.520 --> 09:11.040]  That event marks the ending of the Pleistocene era.
[09:11.040 --> 09:20.440]  An epoch in geological time ended 12,600 years ago with this incident, and what the
[09:20.440 --> 09:29.560]  evidence tends to indicate occurred was there was a rather large meteor strike in the arctic.
[09:29.560 --> 09:37.920]  It apparently landed in the ice and melted so much ice that the runoff into the oceans
[09:37.920 --> 09:46.720]  disrupted the ocean currents and caused a thousand-year ice age, a minor ice age.
[09:46.720 --> 09:55.280]  And if you go on the Internet and do a search for younger dryus, D-R-Y-A-S, you'll find
[09:55.280 --> 09:59.480]  some rather interesting charts.
[09:59.480 --> 10:06.040]  At this time, some 12,000 years ago, the temperatures fluctuated wildly.
[10:06.040 --> 10:16.440]  They dropped precipitously for, oh, three or four hundred years, they stayed really low,
[10:16.440 --> 10:25.320]  and then all of a sudden they jumped up 10 or 11 degrees, and then that jumps, reversed
[10:25.320 --> 10:32.400]  itself slightly, and then the temperature started rising back up, and it came up to
[10:32.400 --> 10:41.360]  about three degrees above today's normal about 10,000 years ago.
[10:41.360 --> 10:47.480]  And over that period, the temperatures have fluctuated up and down about six degrees from
[10:47.480 --> 10:57.680]  looking at this chart, and that fluctuation varied over between 500 on the upside, 500
[10:57.680 --> 10:58.680]  on the downside.
[10:58.680 --> 11:05.160]  And over a thousand-year period, the temperature would drop and then rise back up, and it's
[11:05.160 --> 11:08.600]  fluctuated back and forth right now.
[11:08.600 --> 11:21.440]  We are at the lowest temperature that we have seen in 10,000 years, and look at this
[11:21.440 --> 11:29.400]  chart and thought about all of this huffing and puffing about global warming.
[11:29.400 --> 11:34.560]  Well, it's got a long way to go.
[11:34.560 --> 11:42.560]  It's got a long way to go just to come back to what appears to be normal for the last
[11:42.560 --> 11:43.560]  10,000 years.
[11:43.560 --> 11:53.440]  But that's only 10,000 years, but the last 10,000 years, it's been about eight degrees
[11:53.440 --> 11:57.440]  above the prior normal.
[11:57.440 --> 12:03.920]  So we've had a considerable amount of global warming from the Pleistocene era to the Holestate
[12:03.920 --> 12:08.320]  area, which we're in now.
[12:08.320 --> 12:13.160]  So all this stuff about global warming, I'm not going to be too concerned about it.
[12:13.160 --> 12:21.960]  What I am going to be concerned about is how many more of those rocks are out there.
[12:21.960 --> 12:28.640]  You know, if we had a meteor coming at us that potentially big enough to cause an extinction
[12:28.640 --> 12:39.680]  event, because of the vastness of deep space, the last projection I heard was we were not
[12:39.680 --> 12:47.880]  likely to find it unless we got lucky, until it was 30 days out.
[12:47.880 --> 12:55.160]  I've talked to Pastor Massit about this today, and it seems like we as a species are dancing
[12:55.160 --> 12:57.160]  on the head of a pin.
[12:57.160 --> 13:02.480]  Okay, I have a couple of collars, so I will go to them.
[13:02.480 --> 13:07.920]  I'm going to go to Cassie in Arizona.
[13:07.920 --> 13:10.920]  Hello, Miss Cassie.
[13:10.920 --> 13:14.040]  Hi, how are you?
[13:14.040 --> 13:16.800]  I am doing wonderful.
[13:16.800 --> 13:21.480]  I don't know if you remember, but we talked a few weeks ago.
[13:21.480 --> 13:29.920]  I had been in Cole's department store, and I took a blanket out that I had forgotten
[13:29.920 --> 13:32.240]  was in the shopping cart.
[13:32.240 --> 13:38.640]  They've never given me a copy of the security tape.
[13:38.640 --> 13:42.040]  They keep trying to bring the security tape in at the last second.
[13:42.040 --> 13:49.760]  Anyway, make a long story short, we filed a criminal complaint against basically the
[13:49.760 --> 13:57.880]  prosecutor's office for not giving us discoveries, which they still, well, they just tried again
[13:57.880 --> 13:59.680]  to do it the last second.
[13:59.680 --> 14:09.440]  We filed a complaint, and we gave it to the magistrate, like you suggested, and the judge
[14:09.440 --> 14:15.240]  came back and said this, and this is why I'm calling you back, says that Arizona does not
[14:15.240 --> 14:22.560]  provide a statutory basis for a private citizen to file a criminal complaint, and he basically
[14:22.560 --> 14:28.440]  goes on and on and on, but he says that Arizona is not a state where a citizen can file a
[14:28.440 --> 14:32.400]  criminal complaint.
[14:32.400 --> 14:33.400]  That is interesting.
[14:33.400 --> 14:45.880]  Is there anything, there is nothing in law in Texas that authorizes a citizen to file
[14:45.880 --> 14:46.880]  a criminal complaint.
[14:46.880 --> 14:50.080]  And that's basically what he's saying.
[14:50.080 --> 15:03.400]  And neither so what, he should ask him any point is, just where is the prohibition?
[15:03.400 --> 15:13.680]  Where is the specific authorization for a police officer to file a criminal complaint?
[15:13.680 --> 15:15.680]  There's not one.
[15:15.680 --> 15:21.840]  You see, a police officer does not file a criminal complaint in his official capacity
[15:21.840 --> 15:24.840]  as a police officer.
[15:24.840 --> 15:32.760]  He files a criminal complaint in the only capacity a complaint can be filed in.
[15:32.760 --> 15:42.680]  And that's a private capacity with the credible person, an ordinary citizen.
[15:42.680 --> 15:50.960]  You should prepare criminal charges against this judge and file them with the next higher
[15:50.960 --> 15:51.960]  judge.
[15:51.960 --> 16:00.400]  To accuse the judge of misfeasence in office, when a pro-N.A., if you'll check Arizona code,
[16:00.400 --> 16:06.000]  they're going to be like every other code because this has been standing law since
[16:06.000 --> 16:10.120]  1215 A.D.
[16:10.120 --> 16:15.160]  When the Dukes drug King John down to the River Triumphant and threatened to cut his
[16:15.160 --> 16:24.040]  arrogant head off if he didn't sign the Magna Carta, a document he had agreed to sign some
[16:24.040 --> 16:31.200]  20 years earlier when the French invaded and they got the Dukes to help overturn the invasion,
[16:31.200 --> 16:36.600]  King John agreed to sign this document and refused.
[16:36.600 --> 16:40.840]  It took a few years, but to finally drug him down and threaten to cut his head off if
[16:40.840 --> 16:46.480]  he signed it, it established magistrates.
[16:46.480 --> 16:53.800]  And all complaints are directed to some magistrate, there's nothing restricting you from filing
[16:53.800 --> 16:54.800]  a complaint.
[16:54.800 --> 17:02.800]  I'll go ahead and live that a little more when I come back, we'll rent out things.
[17:02.800 --> 17:06.800]  You want to talk about gun grabbing, gotcha down, how would you like to be the proud owner
[17:06.800 --> 17:13.040]  of a brand new AR-15, then go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter the drawing to win a free Rock
[17:13.040 --> 17:17.480]  River AR-15 sponsored by ZombieKillers M on Guns.
[17:17.480 --> 17:21.960]  Support LogosRadio Network by donating just $20 to their fundraiser and you'll get your
[17:21.960 --> 17:23.880]  name entered into the drawing.
[17:23.880 --> 17:30.880]  Second place prize is the Spikes Tactical AR-15 Lower Receiver sponsored by CentralTexasGunworks.com.
[17:30.880 --> 17:35.240]  Every $20 you donate will put your name in the hat, so increase your chances of winning
[17:35.240 --> 17:37.320]  by increasing your donation.
[17:37.320 --> 17:40.400]  Winners must be eligible to lawfully own and possess these items.
[17:40.400 --> 17:43.120]  Please visit LogosRadioNetwork.com for details.
[17:43.120 --> 17:48.600]  If you love all the Liberty-minded programming on LogosRadio Network, contribute to the fundraiser
[17:48.600 --> 17:54.880]  and secure your chance to win a Rock River AR-15 sponsored by ZombieKillers M on Guns.
[17:54.880 --> 17:57.560]  Like him on Facebook at ZombieKillers LLC.
[17:57.560 --> 18:00.560]  Contest ends February 28th.
[18:00.560 --> 18:05.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.880 --> 18:09.320]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.320 --> 18:13.680]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.680 --> 18:14.680]  can win two.
[18:14.680 --> 18:19.480]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.480 --> 18:20.480]  civil rights statute.
[18:20.480 --> 18:24.800]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.800 --> 18:26.840]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.840 --> 18:29.440]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:29.440 --> 18:34.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.120 --> 18:39.240]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.240 --> 18:41.360]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.360 --> 18:46.920]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:46.920 --> 18:49.760]  or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.760 --> 18:57.640]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.640 --> 19:07.640]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:07.640 --> 19:33.640]  at yahoo.com.
[19:33.640 --> 19:34.640]  Okay we are back.
[19:34.640 --> 19:39.520]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Stephens, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio and we're talking to Kathy
[19:39.520 --> 19:51.280]  in Arizona and there's a point I needed to get to that you do not have a specific delineated
[19:51.280 --> 19:59.680]  right to file a criminal complaint with a magistrate.
[19:59.680 --> 20:06.440]  Well then again you don't have a specifically stipulated right to go to the bathroom either.
[20:06.440 --> 20:11.440]  Check the code, it's not in there.
[20:11.440 --> 20:14.680]  There are a lot of things that are not in there.
[20:14.680 --> 20:26.360]  The only thing that is in there are specific restrictions and you are only restricted where
[20:26.360 --> 20:31.080]  you are specifically restricted.
[20:31.080 --> 20:42.560]  Now I am going to bet that in Arizona you have a code that mimics 18 U.S., 18 U.S. code
[20:42.560 --> 20:43.560]  4.
[20:43.560 --> 20:51.280]  Now this is not 18 U.S. code 2932 or something, way down there in the back, this right up
[20:51.280 --> 20:56.560]  there in the front, it's 4 and 3 has been repealed.
[20:56.560 --> 21:02.560]  It's called misprison of felony, they put it right up in the front.
[21:02.560 --> 21:10.280]  If you have knowledge that a felony has been committed and you do not report that knowledge,
[21:10.280 --> 21:11.280]  that's a crime.
[21:11.280 --> 21:16.160]  In Texas it's a crime not to report a felony.
[21:16.160 --> 21:27.280]  So if you can be criminally prosecuted for not reporting crime, then that implies that
[21:27.280 --> 21:31.000]  you can report crime and how do you report crime?
[21:31.000 --> 21:37.080]  So they say you go down and give a voluntary statement to the police officer, well who
[21:37.080 --> 21:41.000]  are you directed to do that?
[21:41.000 --> 21:48.400]  I haven't seen anywhere in any code that authorizes me to give a criminal complaint to a police
[21:48.400 --> 21:51.400]  officer.
[21:51.400 --> 22:00.960]  The only thing I can find is that a magistrate is required to take a criminal complaint, doesn't
[22:00.960 --> 22:03.960]  say who must give it to him.
[22:03.960 --> 22:15.920]  So I suggest you charge this judge with misfeasance in office and official misconduct by misfeasance
[22:15.920 --> 22:23.880]  in office and file that with the next hire judge and accuse this judge of failing to
[22:23.880 --> 22:29.960]  perform his duty as a magistrate, maybe you'll look at Arizona code.
[22:29.960 --> 22:38.800]  You will have a set of code in your criminal procedures, manual or volume, wherever they
[22:38.800 --> 22:43.920]  have your criminal procedures, in Texas it's the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[22:43.920 --> 22:51.720]  In most states it's part of the general statutes, like North Carolina's General Statute 14
[22:51.720 --> 22:52.960]  covers criminal procedure.
[22:52.960 --> 22:59.000]  You'll have it in there and it will define the duties of magistrates.
[22:59.000 --> 23:06.320]  It should not judge us, or there may be judges, but not necessarily, it can be mayors.
[23:06.320 --> 23:13.000]  And I'm going to magistrate his duties and vote when someone makes it known to him that
[23:13.000 --> 23:15.000]  a crime has been committed.
[23:15.000 --> 23:16.000]  That's right.
[23:16.000 --> 23:19.000]  Throughout the relationship that we have to do.
[23:19.000 --> 23:20.000]  Yeah.
[23:20.000 --> 23:21.000]  Anyone.
[23:21.000 --> 23:26.000]  It doesn't say in there who can make it known to a magistrate that a crime has been committed.
[23:26.000 --> 23:31.000]  It doesn't say in there who must make it known to a magistrate that a crime has been committed.
[23:31.000 --> 23:37.000]  It does say in most every code that when a magistrate has made known to him that a crime
[23:37.000 --> 23:41.000]  has been committed, he has a specific duty in that duty, so he's holding an examining
[23:41.000 --> 23:42.000]  trial.
[23:42.000 --> 23:47.000]  So the judge is playing a little song about suicide and pass.
[23:47.000 --> 23:51.000]  And from my part that's wonderful.
[23:51.000 --> 23:55.000]  Now you get a shot at the judge.
[23:55.000 --> 23:59.000]  He touched your car, baby.
[23:59.000 --> 24:04.000]  He made this really, really stupid argument.
[24:04.000 --> 24:10.000]  So now go to a higher judge and higher judge is likely to look at this and say, he did
[24:10.000 --> 24:11.000]  what?
[24:11.000 --> 24:15.000]  Are you kidding me?
[24:15.000 --> 24:20.000]  And then when this judge refuses to do his duty.
[24:20.000 --> 24:27.000]  And you need to look at the how the law is structured in Arizona.
[24:27.000 --> 24:34.000]  In most states, the Attorney General has prosecutorial powers.
[24:34.000 --> 24:42.000]  In Texas, the Attorney General was primarily a litigator for the state.
[24:42.000 --> 24:53.000]  And it wasn't until 2007 that the legislature passed a law that gave the prosecuting attorney
[24:53.000 --> 24:55.000]  prosecutorial power.
[24:55.000 --> 25:04.000]  Prior to this, the Attorney General in Texas was the prosecutor of original jurisdiction
[25:04.000 --> 25:08.000]  in only one instance.
[25:08.000 --> 25:16.000]  And that was in the case of an allegation under the Open Records Act against a prosecuting
[25:16.000 --> 25:17.000]  attorney.
[25:17.000 --> 25:25.000]  Since you wouldn't expect to prosecute a prosecuting self, in that case the prosecution would be
[25:25.000 --> 25:29.000]  performed by the Attorney General.
[25:29.000 --> 25:44.000]  In 2012, I'm sorry, 2007, the legislature passed a law that updated 39.01 and to 39.05.
[25:44.000 --> 25:51.000]  And it gave the Attorney General concurrent jurisdiction with the prosecutor in a matter
[25:51.000 --> 25:54.000]  of criminal complaints against public officials.
[25:54.000 --> 26:00.000]  So you need to check the duties of the Attorney General.
[26:00.000 --> 26:09.000]  If in your state he has prosecutorial power, then it's appropriate if you filed the complaint
[26:09.000 --> 26:15.000]  with the district attorney, the prosecuting attorney.
[26:15.000 --> 26:18.000]  And the prosecuting attorney refused to prosecute.
[26:18.000 --> 26:26.000]  That's an act of misleadance in office and shielding from prosecution, obstruction of
[26:26.000 --> 26:31.000]  justice, and final stack of them.
[26:31.000 --> 26:40.000]  And in thinking about it, if the judge communicated to you that you had no power to file a criminal
[26:40.000 --> 26:47.000]  complaint, that's tampering with a witness obstruction of justice.
[26:47.000 --> 26:54.000]  That's the one I think I would take is the judge telling me this nonsense.
[26:54.000 --> 26:59.000]  You call that tampering with a witness and told you that in order to prevent you from
[26:59.000 --> 27:03.000]  filing a criminal complaint.
[27:03.000 --> 27:09.000]  So take that to the highest level judge you can find.
[27:09.000 --> 27:16.000]  I sent a bunch of complaints to the Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[27:16.000 --> 27:20.000]  He was here in Texas and he did nothing.
[27:20.000 --> 27:26.000]  So I turned around and filed criminal charges with the district attorney against the Chief Justice.
[27:26.000 --> 27:32.000]  And that knucklehead sent me a piece of paper saying that he was ahead of their public
[27:32.000 --> 27:34.000]  integrity unit.
[27:34.000 --> 27:37.000]  And he decided to take no action.
[27:37.000 --> 27:41.000]  Holy mackerel, public integrity unit.
[27:41.000 --> 27:45.000]  You can't have one of those in Texas.
[27:45.000 --> 27:51.000]  We have special statute and the statute says that when a prosecuting attorney is made known
[27:51.000 --> 27:56.000]  in any manner that a public official violated a law relating to his office, he shall reduce
[27:56.000 --> 27:59.000]  complaint and information submitted to the grand jury.
[27:59.000 --> 28:06.000]  Where do they get off having a public integrity unit?
[28:06.000 --> 28:14.000]  He is required by statute to get that out of his hands and get it in the hands of the grand jury.
[28:14.000 --> 28:22.000]  Well, he didn't do that and he used this unit that they put together for the specific purpose
[28:22.000 --> 28:27.000]  of violating Article 2.03 Code of Criminal Procedure, these guys are boneheads.
[28:27.000 --> 28:35.000]  And they think that because they're the prosecutors, they can have no blowback.
[28:35.000 --> 28:37.000]  They think they have absolute immunity.
[28:37.000 --> 28:40.000]  They have no such thing.
[28:40.000 --> 28:46.000]  Now, they're pretty well protected from civil litigation, but who cares about that?
[28:46.000 --> 28:47.000]  Right.
[28:47.000 --> 28:53.000]  I want him indicted and he has no immunity from that.
[28:53.000 --> 29:00.000]  Nobody has immunity from violations of criminal law.
[29:00.000 --> 29:03.000]  So, does that sound workable?
[29:03.000 --> 29:04.000]  Yes.
[29:04.000 --> 29:05.000]  Yes, it does.
[29:05.000 --> 29:10.000]  I do have a question though.
[29:10.000 --> 29:17.000]  Can we file a criminal complaint using the authority of the Constitution as our basis of law?
[29:17.000 --> 29:18.000]  No.
[29:18.000 --> 29:23.000]  Constitution grants you no rights.
[29:23.000 --> 29:24.000]  Okay.
[29:24.000 --> 29:28.000]  Constitution is a restrictive document.
[29:28.000 --> 29:30.000]  It doesn't grant you any rights.
[29:30.000 --> 29:33.000]  You already got all of them.
[29:33.000 --> 29:39.000]  It just puts very specific restrictions on governmental entities.
[29:39.000 --> 29:42.000]  So, you can't use Constitution.
[29:42.000 --> 29:45.000]  You don't need to use anything.
[29:45.000 --> 29:46.000]  Okay.
[29:46.000 --> 29:50.000]  I have to say, where am I restricted from doing this thing?
[29:50.000 --> 29:51.000]  Okay.
[29:51.000 --> 29:52.000]  Hang on.
[29:52.000 --> 29:53.000]  Randy Kalb, Deb.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  Steve.
[29:54.000 --> 29:55.000]  Jenny Craig.
[29:55.000 --> 29:56.000]  Real law radio.
[29:56.000 --> 29:57.000]  Call it number 512-646-1984.
[29:57.000 --> 29:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[29:59.000 --> 30:05.000]  Mirror, mirror on the wall, who has got the creepiest looking glass of all?
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  The New York Times is who?
[30:07.000 --> 30:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you about a weird scheme to put RFID and voice recognition technology in your bathroom mirror.
[30:14.000 --> 30:15.000]  Next.
[30:15.000 --> 30:23.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  That's creepy.
[30:24.000 --> 30:26.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:26.000 --> 30:29.000]  StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:29.000 --> 30:36.000]  StartPage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified.
[30:36.000 --> 30:40.000]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with StartPage.
[30:40.000 --> 30:42.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:46.000 --> 30:53.000]  As if we didn't have enough privacy-invading gadgets, now the New York Times is experimenting with a high-tech two-way mirror.
[30:53.000 --> 30:57.000]  It's actually a spy that watches you and everything in your bathroom.
[30:57.000 --> 31:03.000]  The so-called magic mirror would let the time splash headlines or videos on your mirror as you brush your teeth.
[31:03.000 --> 31:12.000]  But it would also creepily scan your voice and face along with microchips embedded in products in your bathroom like drug vials in your medicine cabinet.
[31:12.000 --> 31:20.000]  That information would get broadcast silently to the Times and stored in their database file on you for sale to the highest bidder.
[31:20.000 --> 31:24.000]  Wow, Snow White's evil stepmom had nothing on these guys.
[31:24.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:54.000 --> 31:58.000]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:10.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[32:13.000 --> 32:15.000]  Brave New Books?
[32:15.000 --> 32:25.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[32:28.000 --> 32:33.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[32:33.000 --> 32:37.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[32:37.000 --> 32:45.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[32:48.000 --> 32:53.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[32:53.000 --> 33:01.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[33:01.000 --> 33:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:11.000 --> 33:25.000]  Yeah, I got the warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.000 --> 33:43.000]  Okay.
[33:43.000 --> 33:48.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig in Logos Radio.
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  We're talking to Kathy in Arizona.
[33:52.000 --> 33:59.000]  Okay. When we went out, we were talking about...
[33:59.000 --> 34:04.000]  I think we've finished this subject. Have I pretty well covered this?
[34:04.000 --> 34:06.000]  Well, I have a question.
[34:06.000 --> 34:07.000]  Oh, okay.
[34:07.000 --> 34:10.000]  The judge comes back, and this is what he says.
[34:10.000 --> 34:13.000]  I just want you to comment on what he said.
[34:13.000 --> 34:28.000]  The private citizen cannot circumvent this important element of review and charging decisions of those with lawful authority to bring criminal charges within the state or municipality.
[34:28.000 --> 34:42.000]  Despite captioning the criminal complaint in the name and by the authority of the state of Arizona, Mrs. Sutton does not provide any authority that she has vested with the power to bring charges in the name of the state of Arizona.
[34:42.000 --> 34:50.000]  So, should I not title it in the name and by the authority of the state of Arizona?
[34:50.000 --> 34:59.000]  I don't know. It depends. That is how it's required to be captioned in Texas.
[34:59.000 --> 35:05.000]  Texas law says all complaints shall run in the name of the state of Texas.
[35:05.000 --> 35:27.000]  Yeah. He also, if I can read one more sentence, he says submitting a document under such a heading leads to the conclusion that Kathy Denton agrees that only a person acting under authority of the state of Arizona is authorized to file a criminal complaint.
[35:27.000 --> 35:33.000]  That is horse manure.
[35:33.000 --> 35:39.000]  That's just song and dance and seltzer down your pants.
[35:39.000 --> 35:40.000]  Okay.
[35:40.000 --> 35:53.000]  Take that up the chain. No state wants it such that the citizens of the state cannot report crime.
[35:53.000 --> 35:59.000]  That would create a horrible mess for them.
[35:59.000 --> 36:06.000]  So, the judge is just huffing and puffing a bunch of nonsense.
[36:06.000 --> 36:15.000]  So, I would look at the criminal complaint. Are you in court on a criminal issue?
[36:15.000 --> 36:18.000]  Yeah. So, look at their complaint to me.
[36:18.000 --> 36:25.000]  Yeah. Look at the structure of their complaint, especially the heading and such.
[36:25.000 --> 36:27.000]  Okay.
[36:27.000 --> 36:33.000]  Do you file that? You know, have you ever filed a civil suit?
[36:33.000 --> 36:35.000]  No, I haven't.
[36:35.000 --> 36:40.000]  Have you known anybody who has?
[36:40.000 --> 36:41.000]  No, I don't.
[36:41.000 --> 36:56.000]  Okay. Well, anyway, I defy you to find anywhere in any law an authorization for a citizen to file a civil suit.
[36:56.000 --> 37:01.000]  It's not in there.
[37:01.000 --> 37:02.000]  Okay.
[37:02.000 --> 37:08.000]  It's not in there because you are not restricted from doing it.
[37:08.000 --> 37:13.000]  And anything you are not forbidden to do, you can do.
[37:13.000 --> 37:25.000]  So, I would charge this judge with tampering with the witness for lying to you about your duty to report crime.
[37:25.000 --> 37:38.000]  I did so for the purpose of shielding the accused from prosecution while committing misfeasance in office and failing to perform his duty as a magistrate.
[37:38.000 --> 37:48.000]  So, this is part once you get it, then when you go in and they don't do what you ask them to do, that's okay.
[37:48.000 --> 37:51.000]  You touched my tour, baby.
[37:51.000 --> 37:57.000]  You get to come after you and you get to wind it up higher in the courts.
[37:57.000 --> 38:02.000]  Higher you get in the courts, the more politics you create on the bottom.
[38:02.000 --> 38:10.000]  And absolutely, you need to prepare a judicial conduct complaint against this judge.
[38:10.000 --> 38:25.000]  I think that most of the day-to-day finishing up, creating a form from the federal canons of judicial ethics,
[38:25.000 --> 38:37.000]  turning it into not exactly a questionnaire, but under each canon, I have a section there to write a complaint based on that canon.
[38:37.000 --> 38:41.000]  I'm hoping that my programmer had this up in a few days.
[38:41.000 --> 38:47.000]  I also got bar grievance finished, so it's ready to plug into the system.
[38:47.000 --> 38:54.000]  We had to go back and do some major rewrites, but I finished up most of my end today,
[38:54.000 --> 39:04.000]  so I'm hoping within a few days we'll have them both up where you can go in and just fill in the blanks and it'll spit you out of grievance.
[39:04.000 --> 39:11.000]  I'm really needed up because we need to start filing grievances at the backdrop of a hat.
[39:11.000 --> 39:22.000]  You file a judicial conduct complaint against this judge, and while the State Commission on judicial conduct will toss it in the trash,
[39:22.000 --> 39:27.000]  his insurance provider won't, and his bond rating goes up.
[39:27.000 --> 39:31.000]  That'll make him really unhappy.
[39:31.000 --> 39:38.000]  Okay. So look at a judicial conduct complaint against him for tampering with a witness,
[39:38.000 --> 39:43.000]  and lying to you on the court, you're going to find there's a...
[39:43.000 --> 39:48.000]  I did the federal first because they will pretty well mimic all the rest of them.
[39:48.000 --> 39:59.000]  There are a set of American Bar Association model standards, but they had a whole section missing, so I went to the federal first.
[39:59.000 --> 40:07.000]  If you go through the federal canons of judicial ethics, every state is going to be pretty close to that,
[40:07.000 --> 40:16.000]  and I have these... you just... once you find the canon that the judge violated,
[40:16.000 --> 40:24.000]  you start out by saying the judge did what the canon says they can't do as follows.
[40:24.000 --> 40:31.000]  Don't cite the canon, just state your complaint in the verbiage of the canon,
[40:31.000 --> 40:35.000]  and then give the facts of how you did what you claim.
[40:35.000 --> 40:44.000]  And if I want every time he moves, you go to the higher court, and I suggest you don't go where they can see you,
[40:44.000 --> 40:52.000]  you send it by certified mail, they'll send it back to you with this really nice letter telling you these,
[40:52.000 --> 41:00.000]  oh my, give you all the sage advice, this is what you really should do, blah, blah, blah, yada, yada.
[41:00.000 --> 41:06.000]  And you say, oh, okay, wonderful, I should go to this place and file criminal charges.
[41:06.000 --> 41:12.000]  But what you don't tell them is you're going to file them on him, and actually it's better.
[41:12.000 --> 41:16.000]  Higher you go, the better. For you, the more political.
[41:16.000 --> 41:23.000]  Power, the more political effect it has, and the higher up you go,
[41:23.000 --> 41:33.000]  the more cognizant these guys are of how dangerous to their political aspirations upset citizens are.
[41:33.000 --> 41:38.000]  These guys on the bottom don't quite get that, but the higher up they go,
[41:38.000 --> 41:43.000]  the more people they have trying to get their position, the more political they are.
[41:43.000 --> 41:49.000]  And they will not like this one little bit.
[41:49.000 --> 41:56.000]  And especially if you go after the judge for what he told you,
[41:56.000 --> 42:03.000]  this gives fair warning to the next judge to be careful how you handle yourself.
[42:03.000 --> 42:06.000]  Okay, does all that make sense?
[42:06.000 --> 42:08.000]  Yes, it does.
[42:08.000 --> 42:12.000]  Does it sound like fun?
[42:12.000 --> 42:15.000]  Yes, sounds like fun.
[42:15.000 --> 42:21.000]  We did file a bar grievance here in Arizona as a prosecutor and actually my attorney,
[42:21.000 --> 42:27.000]  because I still haven't gotten a copy of the surveillance tape.
[42:27.000 --> 42:35.000]  But anyways, I couldn't really tell if the Bar Association got the bar grievance.
[42:35.000 --> 42:43.000]  I don't like give you anything. I filed it online, like you told us to, but it's, you know, it's...
[42:43.000 --> 42:50.000]  Did you send it a certified return receipt?
[42:50.000 --> 42:55.000]  We went to bargreevance.net and filed it on that site.
[42:55.000 --> 43:03.000]  Oh, okay, okay. See, the problem the lawyer has is if he doesn't tell the bar
[43:03.000 --> 43:09.000]  and his insurance company that he got grieved, he doesn't have insurance.
[43:09.000 --> 43:17.000]  So he has to tattle on himself, otherwise he's paying 30 to 40 grand a year for nothing.
[43:17.000 --> 43:23.000]  So that's how they get noticed and I will be doing some research to find all of the carriers
[43:23.000 --> 43:27.000]  and we'll make up an email list that when I get this put together,
[43:27.000 --> 43:32.000]  it will automatically email the grievance to every one of the carriers.
[43:32.000 --> 43:36.000]  As well as posting it online.
[43:36.000 --> 43:38.000]  Okay, thank you, Kathy.
[43:38.000 --> 43:43.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio.
[43:43.000 --> 43:47.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:47.000 --> 43:50.000]  Do you have any more questions for us, Kathy?
[43:50.000 --> 43:52.000]  No, I'm good. Thank you so much.
[43:52.000 --> 44:01.000]  Okay, thank you. We'll be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:08.000]  Mr. President, members of Congress, you've been making a lot of noise about taking our guns away,
[44:08.000 --> 44:11.000]  but you might want to review history.
[44:11.000 --> 44:15.000]  1835, Gonzales, Texas Territory.
[44:15.000 --> 44:20.000]  The authorities wanted to confiscate the big gun that protected that colony.
[44:20.000 --> 44:22.000]  You know what the people said?
[44:22.000 --> 44:29.000]  Come and take it, because they were willing to fight for their freedom and their guns.
[44:29.000 --> 44:31.000]  So are we.
[44:31.000 --> 44:34.000]  Come and take it, if you want it.
[44:34.000 --> 44:37.000]  Come and take it, if you think you can.
[44:37.000 --> 44:40.000]  Come and take it, but I want you.
[44:40.000 --> 44:43.000]  You'll have to fight for my conditions.
[44:43.000 --> 44:46.000]  We want the freedom that God gave us.
[44:46.000 --> 44:49.000]  So you best not cross that line.
[44:49.000 --> 44:54.000]  If you want this gun, you've got to come through us and take it.
[44:54.000 --> 45:00.000]  One shot at a time, just like Gonzales. We're keeping our guns.
[45:24.000 --> 45:28.000]  One with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:55.000]  prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[45:55.000 --> 45:57.000]  and click on the banner.
[45:57.000 --> 46:23.000]  That's toll-free, 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:23.000 --> 46:32.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:32.000 --> 46:36.000]  Randy Kelton, Deb Stephen, City Craig, Ruleoflaw Radio,
[46:36.000 --> 46:40.000]  and we were talking to Kathy.
[46:40.000 --> 46:45.000]  Now we're going to go to Lee in Texas.
[46:45.000 --> 46:48.000]  I said, Leah.
[46:48.000 --> 46:49.000]  It's Leah.
[46:49.000 --> 46:52.000]  Okay. Hello, Leah.
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  Thank you for taking my call.
[46:56.000 --> 47:00.000]  Glad to do it. What is on your mind tonight?
[47:00.000 --> 47:04.000]  Okay, so I had sent you an email earlier this week,
[47:04.000 --> 47:08.000]  and I had led you to a website that I had created.
[47:08.000 --> 47:13.000]  It's www.burnlyonce.com.
[47:13.000 --> 47:16.000]  I remember that.
[47:16.000 --> 47:25.000]  So for listeners to bring them up to speed with it, my husband and I lost the very real
[47:25.000 --> 47:27.000]  estate case.
[47:27.000 --> 47:30.000]  We lost the case in a summary judgment.
[47:30.000 --> 47:35.000]  Our lawyer advised us to not be present at the summary judgment,
[47:35.000 --> 47:39.000]  and there was no court reporter.
[47:39.000 --> 47:44.000]  We lost, and we do not know why we lost.
[47:44.000 --> 47:49.000]  But the judge denied us a jury trial,
[47:49.000 --> 47:56.000]  which we really believe that a jury of our peers would have understood.
[47:56.000 --> 47:59.000]  Okay, what's your in Texas?
[47:59.000 --> 48:01.000]  Yes, we're in Texas.
[48:01.000 --> 48:06.000]  On what grounds did the judge deny you a jury trial?
[48:06.000 --> 48:11.000]  Well, according to our attorney, he doesn't have to really specify.
[48:11.000 --> 48:17.000]  The judge doesn't really have to specify, and he really didn't specify.
[48:17.000 --> 48:20.000]  Okay, that is a constitutional right,
[48:20.000 --> 48:26.000]  and the judge doesn't have to tell you why he denied it.
[48:26.000 --> 48:32.000]  You need to sue your lawyer for everything you lost here.
[48:32.000 --> 48:35.000]  Okay.
[48:35.000 --> 48:37.000]  The chump?
[48:37.000 --> 48:43.000]  But okay, I'm saying that kind of all handed, I really don't know what all the details are yet.
[48:43.000 --> 48:46.000]  Actually, I don't have any idea what the case is about,
[48:46.000 --> 48:52.000]  other than that there was some property involved.
[48:52.000 --> 48:54.000]  What are the specific issues?
[48:54.000 --> 49:00.000]  They denied you a jury trial, had a summary judgment hearing.
[49:00.000 --> 49:05.000]  What was the nature of summary judgment?
[49:05.000 --> 49:08.000]  Well, so we were the plaintiffs,
[49:08.000 --> 49:13.000]  and the defendants were two real estate agents, a broker and the sellers of a home.
[49:13.000 --> 49:22.000]  And we were seen because the listing agent of this real estate company,
[49:22.000 --> 49:27.000]  she added an aluminum sun porch to the gross living area of the house.
[49:27.000 --> 49:38.000]  And she overrode, I guess the company's policy is to auto-populate the MLS listing with what PCAT has.
[49:38.000 --> 49:41.000]  And she did not do that.
[49:41.000 --> 49:47.000]  Instead, during the discovery phase, it came out how this 450 square feet got added.
[49:47.000 --> 49:52.000]  She said in her deposition that she called the seller, said,
[49:52.000 --> 49:58.000]  hey, how big is this enclosed porch? He estimated it to be about 450 square feet.
[49:58.000 --> 50:00.000]  She added it to the PCAT.
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  What was the same real estate company on both ends?
[50:03.000 --> 50:07.000]  But we did find in our intermediary agreement that they, you know,
[50:07.000 --> 50:10.000]  our buyer's agent was from the company, the listing agent was from the company.
[50:10.000 --> 50:16.000]  But also in the discovery process, it was revealed during deposition
[50:16.000 --> 50:20.000]  that our buyer's agent asked the listing agent,
[50:20.000 --> 50:28.000]  hey, why is the MLS listing 450 square feet different than the PCAT?
[50:28.000 --> 50:33.000]  And the listing agent said, I added the sun porch.
[50:33.000 --> 50:36.000]  Well, our agent did not disclose that to us.
[50:36.000 --> 50:40.000]  And this has all been established in deposition.
[50:40.000 --> 50:43.000]  So what we...
[50:43.000 --> 50:45.000]  Okay, hold on.
[50:45.000 --> 50:51.000]  The fact that he didn't disclose that,
[50:51.000 --> 50:58.000]  how is that relevant?
[50:58.000 --> 51:02.000]  I'm not being flippant here.
[51:02.000 --> 51:08.000]  It's an area of law I'm not specifically knowledgeable about.
[51:08.000 --> 51:14.000]  How is the square foot area of the property calculated?
[51:14.000 --> 51:16.000]  Is the...
[51:16.000 --> 51:25.000]  Are enclosed porches normally included in the calculation of square footage of the property?
[51:25.000 --> 51:32.000]  Is there something to that restricts that computation?
[51:32.000 --> 51:35.000]  Okay, so...
[51:35.000 --> 51:36.000]  Wait a minute.
[51:36.000 --> 51:38.000]  This is a really important question.
[51:38.000 --> 51:41.000]  It goes to whether or not you have a claim.
[51:41.000 --> 51:43.000]  Right.
[51:43.000 --> 51:45.000]  So is there...
[51:45.000 --> 51:50.000]  I do have the answer to that because they have certified letters from EALCB,
[51:50.000 --> 51:54.000]  which means the Texas Appraisal Licensing Certification Board.
[51:54.000 --> 51:58.000]  They're the ones who govern the appraisers.
[51:58.000 --> 52:00.000]  And we have signed...
[52:00.000 --> 52:05.000]  We had investigators come out and whatnot,
[52:05.000 --> 52:08.000]  and all of them say, you know, absolutely not.
[52:08.000 --> 52:14.000]  It doesn't count as... Okay, good. Good. That's exactly what we needed.
[52:14.000 --> 52:20.000]  Well, also, though, it's important to know that the Travis County tax assessor
[52:20.000 --> 52:25.000]  of that department also came out to the property and said...
[52:25.000 --> 52:30.000]  They said it before, and they say it again, and they hold true to know these people
[52:30.000 --> 52:33.000]  never paid taxes on that 460 square feet.
[52:33.000 --> 52:38.000]  They say it's a porch, not gross living area, and they will never count it as such.
[52:38.000 --> 52:40.000]  Okay, good. That's what you need.
[52:40.000 --> 52:48.000]  Okay, what I don't understand is what was the nature of the pleading for some re-judgment,
[52:48.000 --> 52:52.000]  and what did the judge grant?
[52:52.000 --> 52:55.000]  Well, I don't... I'm not sure.
[52:55.000 --> 52:57.000]  Well, I didn't see that.
[52:57.000 --> 53:03.000]  I know that they were saying the defense brought it to the judge as a frivolous lawsuit
[53:03.000 --> 53:05.000]  that they were saying we were bringing...
[53:05.000 --> 53:11.000]  Okay, okay. We can't really talk about the suit if you don't know what the issues are.
[53:11.000 --> 53:19.000]  So we don't know if the suit was frivolous, you need to sue your lawyer.
[53:19.000 --> 53:25.000]  The defense attorney said we brought forth the frivolous lawsuit, and that's why they brought it.
[53:25.000 --> 53:29.000]  Well, of course the defense lawyer is going to say that.
[53:29.000 --> 53:34.000]  If the judge agreed with him that it was a frivolous lawsuit,
[53:34.000 --> 53:42.000]  then you need to sue your lawyer for fomenting litigation.
[53:42.000 --> 53:46.000]  What was that for doing... what, the litigation?
[53:46.000 --> 53:48.000]  Fomenting.
[53:48.000 --> 53:54.000]  Creating litigation where there was no litigation.
[53:54.000 --> 54:05.000]  If you had no claim, what is your lawyer doing taking your money to file a suit for?
[54:05.000 --> 54:10.000]  You'll sue your lawyer to recover all that you lost
[54:10.000 --> 54:19.000]  if in fact the judge did grant some re-judgment claiming it was a frivolous filing.
[54:19.000 --> 54:22.000]  That's why you pay a lawyer to protect you from that happening.
[54:22.000 --> 54:27.000]  Okay, but Steve, so the thing is, is that we interviewed three attorneys
[54:27.000 --> 54:30.000]  before hiring the one we hired, all real estate attorneys,
[54:30.000 --> 54:35.000]  and they all said it was a plastic square footage case and that it was.
[54:35.000 --> 54:42.000]  Well, then your lawyer screwed you.
[54:42.000 --> 54:46.000]  Where was your lawyer in all of this?
[54:46.000 --> 54:54.000]  Well, this is where we're confused because our attorney is saying it's a judge.
[54:54.000 --> 54:59.000]  He said that he can't understand why the judge granted the summary judgment.
[54:59.000 --> 55:05.000]  Okay, I can't address it unless I've seen the pleadings.
[55:05.000 --> 55:11.000]  You don't seem to be familiar with the pleadings, so you can't help me with them.
[55:11.000 --> 55:15.000]  I need to know what the causes of action were, how they were pled.
[55:15.000 --> 55:17.000]  Oh, okay, I know what you're saying.
[55:17.000 --> 55:24.000]  Okay, so our attorney, he was sitting for deceptive trade.
[55:24.000 --> 55:26.000]  Is that what you mean?
[55:26.000 --> 55:37.000]  He was sitting for deceptive trade and, I believe, misrepresentation of a property.
[55:37.000 --> 55:42.000]  Okay, he would have to claim fraud by non-disclosure.
[55:42.000 --> 55:48.000]  And what do you call it, fraud per se?
[55:48.000 --> 55:53.000]  When you go to court, you can't just say the dirty rotten scoundrel did this to that or the other.
[55:53.000 --> 55:55.000]  Okay, right, so that is what he did.
[55:55.000 --> 55:57.000]  He said, fraud by non-disclosure.
[55:57.000 --> 56:00.000]  He said misrepresentation and deceptive trade.
[56:00.000 --> 56:06.000]  Okay, I would have to, you know, at this point I have no idea what really went on.
[56:06.000 --> 56:11.000]  Do you have an order by the judge granting the summary judgment?
[56:11.000 --> 56:13.000]  I have not seen it.
[56:13.000 --> 56:16.000]  No one has provided us with that after the document.
[56:16.000 --> 56:22.000]  Did you get all the documents from the case from your lawyer?
[56:22.000 --> 56:24.000]  Yes, most of them.
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  I don't know.
[56:25.000 --> 56:27.000]  We got what we got.
[56:27.000 --> 56:29.000]  It's been a struggle.
[56:29.000 --> 56:32.000]  What have you got?
[56:32.000 --> 56:38.000]  I think in that case, you know, actually we have not gotten this document.
[56:38.000 --> 56:42.000]  We're told that we got the summary judgment and then we were counter sued.
[56:42.000 --> 56:46.000]  We were counter sued for $157,000.
[56:46.000 --> 56:49.000]  It sounds like your lawyer screwed you.
[56:49.000 --> 56:52.000]  That's what it sounds like.
[56:52.000 --> 56:58.000]  When you file a legitimate petition, you get a countersuit.
[56:58.000 --> 56:59.000]  Your lawyer is screwing you.
[56:59.000 --> 57:00.000]  He's not doing this job.
[57:00.000 --> 57:05.000]  He's probably getting paid by the other side.
[57:05.000 --> 57:10.000]  Lawyers are low down, low and rotten scoundrels when they get a client.
[57:10.000 --> 57:17.000]  Their only purpose is to see how much of the client's estate they can come away with.
[57:17.000 --> 57:26.000]  Listen to lawyers brag to each other about how much of their client's estate they got to swallowing their lawsuits.
[57:26.000 --> 57:28.000]  It's the profession.
[57:28.000 --> 57:31.000]  The profession has just turned into trash.
[57:31.000 --> 57:33.000]  So we need to take them on.
[57:33.000 --> 57:42.000]  The lawyer is going to be sweet and nice to you and he's going to give you all this sage advice while he's screwing you big time.
[57:42.000 --> 57:48.000]  Well, the thing is, I don't see how that could be the case because he took it on a contingency.
[57:48.000 --> 57:51.000]  So that says that wouldn't make sense for him.
[57:51.000 --> 57:54.000]  Somebody else is paying him.
[57:54.000 --> 57:56.000]  Not you.
[57:56.000 --> 57:57.000]  It would just...
[57:57.000 --> 58:00.000]  Whose contingency is he working on?
[58:00.000 --> 58:06.000]  And did they dismiss with prejudice or without prejudice?
[58:06.000 --> 58:09.000]  Did he file a motion for reconsideration?
[58:09.000 --> 58:11.000]  Did he give notice of appeal?
[58:11.000 --> 58:13.000]  What is your attorney doing here?
[58:13.000 --> 58:18.000]  He said that he was going to try and file for...
[58:18.000 --> 58:22.000]  From this file at this point?
[58:22.000 --> 58:23.000]  Okay.
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  Well, first he needs to file a motion for reconsideration.
[58:26.000 --> 58:30.000]  The points and the demand for points and authorities if he doesn't...
[58:30.000 --> 58:33.000]  Finding the facts and conclusions of the law if he doesn't have it.
[58:33.000 --> 58:35.000]  There's a lot of things he should be doing.
[58:35.000 --> 58:36.000]  Hang on, we're about to go to break.
[58:36.000 --> 58:38.000]  This is our top of the hour break.
[58:38.000 --> 58:42.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, the rule of law radio.
[58:42.000 --> 58:46.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:46.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:27.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:40.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  Online at theLibertyBee.com
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked the nomination of former GOP Senator Chuck Hagel as the nation's next Defense Secretary
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  over unrelated questions about President Barack Obama's actions in the aftermath of the deadly raid on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  Obama accused Republicans of playing politics with national security during wartime and Democrats vowed to revive the nomination after Congress's week-long break.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  By 58-40, with one abstention, the Senate fell short of the 60-vote threshold required to advance Hagel's nomination to a final up-or-down vote on his confirmation.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  Four Republicans voted with Democrats to end debate and proceed to a final vote.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  A food fight quickly turned into a brawl involving hundreds of students at a Minneapolis high school on Thursday, forcing police to use chemical spray to break up the melee.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Four people were taken to a hospital with minor injuries, including a staff member who was hidden ahead with a bottle according to the school and police.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  The 15-minute track is broke out during lunchtime at South High School. No weapons were used, but about 200 to 300 students were involved.
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  Minneapolis police spokesman Sergeant Bill Palmer said.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  And in gun control news, state legislatures across the country are making a push to restrict citizens' access to firearms.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals.
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  According to the proposed law, any person who prior to the effective date of this law was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  shall have 90 days from such effective date to comply with the law without being subject to prosecution.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  Washington State Senator Ed Murray and James Cole Wells, as well as Adam Klein, all Democrats, have introduced new gun control legislation that goes far above and beyond what anyone would consider a simple sales ban.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  The bill, SB 5737, proposes the banning the sale of assault weapons according to legislation.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  An assault weapon is any semi-automatic pistol, pump-action rifle, or shotgun that can accept detachable magazines with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  The Liberty Beat is sponsored, in part, by Brave New Books, your Austin supplier of one-world-way protein powder.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:57.000]  Online at BraveNewBooksStore.com and by Voice and Exit. March 9th in Austin, Voice and Exit is a conference exploring social entrepreneurship and radical community.
[01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  Take its information at VoiceandExit.com.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  I ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  There's plans wicked in the logic study.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Eddie Craig with Real Law Radio, and we're talking to Leah in Texas.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  Okay, Leah, biggest problem that I see
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  is you don't seem to have a clue as to what's going on here.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Oh, no, I have a clue. I'm just, I have a hard time understanding the legal, you know, like when we talk about...
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Okay, that's the clue I'm talking about.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  You know what the details of the situation are, but you don't know what's going on there.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  No, no, you're right. That you are right about.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  That's been really hard to get the big picture from our representation.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  Okay, you need to listen to our show more and you'll get a lot of clues.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  You might want to go to ruleslawradio.com and look at Jurisdictionary.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  I just wrote it down. I just wrote it down from listening.
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  Jurisdictionary is basic training.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  When lawyers get out of law school, they know a whole lot about law,
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  but they don't teach them squat about the actual practice of law.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  I have to learn that once they get out, how to file a motion, where to file a motion,
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  how to get a motion put on for hearing, all these details.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  Jurisdictionary would give you all of that.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  It would give you a real good grounding in what's going on.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  You're looking at 175,000 loss, like 200 bucks, and you're looking at 175,000 loss.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  I suggest you get that thing that they're, I think, like 24 hours of CDs and go through them twice.
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  When I do this show, I can always tell who has been through Jurisdictionary.
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  That guy keeps calling me out of Michigan.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:41.000]  Mark, first time or two I talked to him, he was telling me what he was doing.
[01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  I said, well, you need to do this.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  He said, I did that.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  You need to file a writ of mandamus.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  I did that.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  Everything I suggested, he said, I did that.
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  I said, you've been through Jurisdictionary, haven't you?
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  Oh, yeah, oh, yeah.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  That will give you the basics you need to understand what is going on and what should be going on.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  The one thing you should have been able to tell me is what the nature of the summary judgment was.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  Okay.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  Was it for a dismissal with prejudice?
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:19.000]  Was it dismissed without prejudice?
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  Did the summary adjustment encompass the entire suit and all the causes of action?
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  There was the entire suit.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  We know that and all the causes of action and the defense was, they were granted all across the board.
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  Everything was denied, everything.
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Okay.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  Did he dismiss with prejudice?
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  That I don't know.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  That's real important.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  If he did not dismiss with prejudice, it changes everything.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Yeah, I didn't know.
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  And I didn't see any documentation.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  I was just told.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Okay.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  That you can get from the court.
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  Okay.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  Go down and get everything that's been filed in the court record.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  I do have everything, actually, so it's on a jump drive and I've almost printed what...
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  Okay.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Then why did you call me?
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  You don't know what's going on.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  You don't even know what to ask me.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  No, I do, actually.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  What I wanted to ask you is what my question was is if you feel that you were denied a jury trial.
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  That's grounds for a new trial.
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  That's grounds for complaints, criminal complaints against a judge.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  That's okay.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  So my question was if you were denied a jury trial, but you were told by your representation
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  and not be present and there was no court reporter, what does a person do at that point?
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  That was my question.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  That's why you sue your lawyer.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  Absolutely not to have any kind of hearing without you present.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  And for them to deny your presence, that's just so they could sit down and see how bad they were going to screw you.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  If your lawyer has gotten your case to a point that you can no longer pursue the case, you need to sue your lawyer.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  Get all your money back from him.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  This is, you know, it's hard.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  You kind of don't want to believe that the person is supposed to be on your side and he didn't do the job.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  You've got to get over that.
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  The courts are corrupt.
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  They're just absolutely corrupt.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  They help people with foreclosure issues and we tell them you can expect the court to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  You must expect the court to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  The trial court is merely there to set the record for appeal.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  So don't worry about the court ruling against you.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  Just get all your points before the court so that you have them available for appeal and that's what you'd want to look at with this lawyer.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  See if he's done that.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:48.000]  If he hasn't done that, if he has pled an issue improperly, he owes you what he costs you.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  He's a professional.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  You didn't hire me to go into court and represent you and that's because I'm not a professional.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  I can't do that.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  It takes a learned counsel and he held himself out as learned counsel.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  He better be learned counsel.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  If he doesn't do his job, sue him.
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  You know, part of the issue was, I guess something I was uncovered is that the room that the real estate agent added was built without any permit and it was built in the drainage even.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  Okay, wait a minute.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  That's a whole other issue.
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:41.000]  The, you're talking discovered porch was built without permits.
[01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  Right.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  And it had no HVAC system or heating or cooling or no installation or anything like that.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  Okay.
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  Did you use a title company?
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  Okay.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  So the loan company that we use, we didn't know that they were partners.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  They're in a partnership with the real estate company.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  We didn't know that.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Who was the lender?
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  The lender was United Lending.
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Okay.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Was that a federally licensed lender?
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Yes.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  Then they must have a title company.
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  We cannot close on a federally involved note without a title company, sue the title company.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  Title company's job to make sure this didn't happen.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  We have investigations going with all of them and so that is something that I will look into for sure.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  And then the appraisals, one of the appraisers had his license result for this and then another appraiser who was hired by the real estate company to say the other guy's appraiser was correct.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  He just got a letter from PA.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  Okay, wait, you're moving all over the place.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  I don't know what that's about.
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  Okay.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  You're throwing a whole lot of details at me, but they're not in any way consistent.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  Let me make a suggestion.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  Sit down with your husband and write out a timeline.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Not an argument in support, no arguments.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  This happened and this happened and this happened.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  Get everything in line.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Then when you talk to someone, me or you talk to a lawyer, put this timeline down in front of them.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  Now, when you talk about one issue or another issue, you can show him where that sat on the timeline and he can orient himself to what's going on.
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  You're throwing all of these pieces of information at me and I have no place to put them because I don't have a referential index.
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  I don't know what any of it refers to and how it's relevant.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  So it's just kind of out there and it leaves me confused.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  So I would suggest first thing, timeline, and that's going to be harder than you think.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Once you get started on it, you'll be surprised at the level of detail this will bring out.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  The second thing is to get jurisdictionary.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  If you're looking at a 175,000 dollar lawsuit, you need jurisdictionary so you'll know how to handle your next lawyer.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  And keep listening to the show.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  We have got lots of good information.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  Yeah, there's a lot of stuff going on. I think I'm just frustrated. I think my first frustration in which there's no way you can understand is why was it called a frivolous lawsuit when we have so much evidence?
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  And there's no way you can tell me that.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  And then the second you did help me with, just what do we do with, well, where do we go from here?
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  Well, it has to, first place to go is the timeline. And then I'd need to see the pleadings to know what was planned and how it was planned.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  And they told you not to show up at the hearing. Has the judge ever threatened you with sanctions?
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  Yes.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  Has he threatened you with contempt?
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  No.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  Okay. So if he threatened you with contempt, that might be a reason for you not coming to a hearing.
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  What were the nature of the sanctions he threatened you with?
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  Clearly, I need jurisdictionary because the sanctions, that was just the hearing for the attorney to see.
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  All I know is what, again, what we were told is that the hearing was for sanctions and for attorney to see.
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  And the judge said no on the sanctions and yes, the attorney to see, but I don't know the nature or why.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  Okay. Then, yeah, you definitely need jurisdictionary so that you'll know what to talk to me about.
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  You'll know the difference between those things that affected you strongly and those things that go to legal issues.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  They're not necessarily the same.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  So I'm going to be looking for things that you probably passed and didn't realize were important.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:51.000]  And jurisdictionary give you a good grounding on what's going to be important and what's not.
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  Okay.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  And the timeline will help greatly.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Well, I do know that our attorney, and again, I didn't see anything in writing, but what he told us is that he thought the judge denied us the jury trial
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  because what the defense presented with the appraisal looked like we got more square footage than what we did
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  because they had an appraisal that said that the room counted.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  But then we have evidence where we're governing, you know, authority states that it will never count.
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  So we can never sell a house for that.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  And he said that's what we lost on.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  That's what we were told, but I never saw anything like it.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Okay. Well, okay, we're about to go to break.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  I really don't know what to tell you unless I have more information about the case.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  And right now I still don't have any idea what the case is about yet.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  Other than some basic details.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  Okay, hang on.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  This is Randy Kelton, David Steven, David Craig.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  We have all radio.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  I call in number 512-6469.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  All the talk about gun grabbing got you down.
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  How would you like to be the proud owner of a brand new AR-15?
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Then go to logosradionetwork.com and enter the drawing to win a free Rock River AR-15
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  sponsored by Zombie Killers M on Guns.
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  Support Logos Radio Network by donating just $20 to their fundraiser
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  and you'll get your name entered into the drawing.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  Second place prize is a Spikes Tactical AR-15 Lower Receiver
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:30.000]  sponsored by CentralTexasGunWorks.com.
[01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  Every $20 you donate will put your name in the hat.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:36.000]  So increase your chances of winning by increasing your donation.
[01:17:36.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  Winners must be eligible to locally own and possess these items.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Please visit logosradionetwork.com for details.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  If you love all the Liberty-minded programming on Logos Radio Network,
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  contribute to the fundraiser and secure your chance to win a Rock River AR-15
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  sponsored by Zombie Killers M on Guns.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Like them on Facebook at Zombie Killers LLC.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Contest ends February 28th.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  At Capital Coin & Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation,
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  For freeze-dried, storable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products,
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silverpool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-440.
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  Now, here tonight, during the Friday night shows myself,
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  so I guess I ought to start throwing all three names out.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  This is Randy Kelton on Rood of the Raw Radio, and we're talking to Leah in Texas.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Leah, do you have anything else?
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  No, I do think looking into the situation with the title company
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  is probably really helpful information that you gave me,
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  and the rest, because it's like I need to do a lot of homework.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  Okay, I'm going to make a suggestion.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  Sure.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  Have you taken any action based on the loan itself?
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  No.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  Okay, you might want to go to remediesinrealestate.com.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  Okay.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  And click on free forensic analysis.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  Okay.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  That will give you a course in real estate mortgage law.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  And what we do here is this will give you a lot more tools to go after them with.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Okay.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  And it will also give you an idea of how things are put together.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  It's quite extensive, and you'll come across some pages that only have a title and there's nothing in them.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  And most of those are not really substantive, the more explanatory, but they're papers I still have to write.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  In putting together an effective structure, it's kind of like that timeline.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  When you look at this, it is, I've done it in a special format where you can see all the different directions this takes
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  and all the different issues that apply to the subject matter.
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  And as I planned it out, I found lots of things I needed to address that I hadn't.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  And when you do your timeline, you'll find the same thing.
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  You might want to go look at a mind map program and map out the whole process.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  What you'll find here is the first page will bring you to a mind map where I've mapped out all of the issues.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  And then you click on the center one and that'll take you through a set of pages just like a normal website.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  But you can always keep going back to this map so you keep oriented on where you're at.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  Always with these kinds of issues, there's more than one thing going on at any one time.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  Everything relates to something else and this map was put together as a way of representing all of these different issues
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  and demonstrating how they interact with one another.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  If you click on the center node, it has a little red arrow on the side of it, click on that arrow
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  and that will take you to the first page.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  And this page, the first thing it tells you to do is send a bunch of letters out.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Where to send them, who to send them to.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  Any time you're going to file a lawsuit, you need to have all your homework done before you ever start.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  And that's really what this is about.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  Whatever your lawsuit is may be somewhat different, but we go through the same steps.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  And you'll find a section in there on Learn the Law where I talk about lawsuits
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  and specifically claims, how you make claims in a lawsuit.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  In a lawsuit, you can't go in there and say the dirty rotten scoundrel, he did this, he did that, he did the other.
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  In a criminal prosecution, a criminal prosecution must be based on an allegation of a violation of a specific statute.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  A lawsuit must be based on a specific and named and legally defined cause of action.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  That's where I was going to earlier and you gave me two causes of action.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  Deceptive Trade Practices Act and fraud by non-disclosure.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  It's a good chance he has fraud per se in there because it appears as though this was deception.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  But each thing has to be claimed under a cause of action and I have a section there I'm building on
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  where I have all of the causes of action listed and I have blank documents, blank pleadings for pleading those causes of action.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  That'd be a good place to look at because as you walk through them, you'll be surprised at the causes of action.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  You'll find that it's likely to feature a suit.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  And that one, this one doesn't cost anything.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  There is a place there where it refers you to jurisdictionary, but this is a massive amount of information
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  and you'll be, once you've gone through a third of this, you'll be in a much better position to take these guys on.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Okay, is that about handle everything for today?
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  I'm sure you're going to be calling me back once you've done some more homework.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  Okay, you're right.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  I think you're absolutely right.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  Thank you so much for your time and being appreciated.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  You are most welcome and you'll find that the homework is very, very well worth it because if nothing else, it gives you a feeling of empowerment
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  and a sense that you can control your own destiny in this lawsuit.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  And we'll talk about some of these tools we have that only process have and there's nothing like a lawyer winding up with a client he can't control
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  because then he gets to go to the other side with plausible deniability.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  I got this no good rotten rascal for a client and he's fixing to kick my behinds if you guys don't help me out on this one.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  So we have a lot of tricks and everything is in the end is going to go to the politics situation.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  Are you good at politics?
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  Oh, oops.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  I had to mute it somehow.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Are you good at politics, Leah?
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:48.000]  So?
[01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  Good.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  We're going to help you with that.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  We say that you will never win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side to think so is naive.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  It is not that way now and it never has been that way.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  For the last 6000 years of recorded history, the courts have been corrupt.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  That doesn't mean you can't find some sort of justice in them, but we do need to understand how they work.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  You won't win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  You win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  And for the most part, what we're about is creating a little local politics, giving that judge to give a ruling that's fair even though he doesn't want to,
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  because he finds himself shackled with the pro se from hell.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  You see lawyers and judges, they're all in the same clique and they kind of work together.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  All of them try to see how much money they can pull out of their clients.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  I mean, that's natural.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  They want to make as much money as they can.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  Well, in order to counteract that, the client has powers and abilities of his own.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  And he has powers and abilities far beyond those of a mortal attorney or judge.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  You can kick their behinds.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  And most, for the most part, people tend to be civil.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  We want to get along, we want to do the right thing for the right reasons.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  Well, you're not in a civil environment when you're in court.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  You're in a legal environment.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  And it has a different set of rules except in the first rule is don't tell the other God's rules.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  So we're going to try to help you sort out some of the rules and show you how to kick their behinds every way from Sunday.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  Okay.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  We are about to go to another break when we come back on the other side.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  We're going to go to Rosetta in 360.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  I don't know where that is.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  Rosetta, Rosanna somewhere.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  Anyway, this is Randy Calton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Man, I'm supposed to stop doing that.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  The rule of law radio are called in number 512-646-1984 when you get old, you get caught in ruts.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  And you do the same things over and over whether they're important or not.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  Well, we'll try to do something innovative and different when we come back on the other side.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:31:11.000]  We'll start over with startpage.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  Later, a mob ransacked a business belonging to the woman's uncle even after she deleted the comment from her Facebook page and posted an apology.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  Oddly though, nobody was arrested for that.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  Like Dr. Panthorn Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  A noble lie, Oklahoma City 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:41.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  The decisions made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  Expose the cover up now at anobleye.com.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  And remember, all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:43.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:53.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:24.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  This is Randy Kelton with our five-hour, four-hour marathon.
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  And all you folks out there, don't forget about our fundraisers and the AR-15.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  That's in the big grand giveaway.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  And I have my soap finally. I lost my supplier and I had to find another one.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  And I made up a new batch each time I make one. I make somewhat different because I'm doing experimenting.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  And I'm pretty well pleased with how this one came out.
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  The next one will be slightly better, but I will hope Monday or Tuesday to start mailing all of these out.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  And I'm going to be looking forward to feedback on them.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  I have a soap ball that was about two inches in diameter when I made it.
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  I've been using it since October and it's about a one and three-quarter inches in diameter.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  The stuff just lasts forever.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  And I'll have it out to you here shortly and hope to get some really good feedback on it.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  And the same thing, good feedback. All feedback is good feedback.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  If you tell me it's got all these major crummy problems, I'll fix them.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  But if I don't know about them, I don't fix them.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  So I'll be looking for positive as well as negative feedback.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  Just let me know how I'm doing.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  Okay, we're going to go to Rosanna and he still didn't tell me where you're from.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  Rosanna, what state are you in?
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  I'm in Ohio.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  Ohio? Okay, you just got a good ruling from the courts in Ohio on the foreclosure issue.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  Okay, I understand you have a probate question.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  Okay, you have to understand, I know quite a bit about law, but I'm not a lawyer.
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  And I'm not well-versed in probate law specifically.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  So keep that in mind in any comment I might make.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  I try to be careful when I get into areas that I'm not really knowledgeable about.
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  Sure.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  Okay, with that said, what do you have for us?
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  I tell you, probate's really nasty and it's going on across the country, swallowing up our seniors in our third state.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  It's a major problem.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  And my story started six years ago with the death of my mother, which went immediately into an investigation.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  It's still an open case today.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  And she was my father's caretaker because he's mentally impaired.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  And when she went out of a picture, I had to step up to the plate and file for guardianship of my father.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  I am the power of attorney, the successor for the trust.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  All their legal documents were in place.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  Every eye dotted, T's crossed.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  And the judge drugged this out for years.
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  And it's all come down to the suspect of my mother's death and the abused person who was abusing my father has not been arrested last September.
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  And so I reapplied emergency for my father and the judge gave him to a lawyer who's been a lawyer for four years and knew all this was going on.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  Now I'm at the point where, back in 2009, this is a very small county, okay, so everybody knows each other.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  And the three judges in the county wrote a letter to the Supreme Court, and I'm looking at it now,
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  wrote a letter to the Supreme Court to recuse all of themselves and bring in somebody that they know, Sumner Walters.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  So they already had this lined up with him.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  And the Ohio Supreme Court granted it and brought in Sumner Walters.
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  They recused themselves because of impropriety, taintedness.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  I want a public records writ against the judge because he was holding public records back from me.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  And it went all the way up to the Supreme Court.
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  And I had to get it because we were filing briefs off of it, okay, from my father's competency assessment.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  That's when he was holding back from us, the doctor's psychological assessment.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  And, of course, that started them.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  They pulled all themselves out, brought in Sumner Walters.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  And then when I filed this emergency guardianship in September after my brother was arrested, finally, he comes right out on the bench and he says,
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  I've talked to the Supreme Court, they've called me about taking this case.
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  He said, and I'm looking at the transcript right here.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  He said, I indicated the Supreme Court office, I would conduct this emergency hearing today.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  But as for any other matters arising out of this or any other further proceedings in this case or anything else relating to the guardianship issue,
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  I asked the court to assign a different judge.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  So today is the last time you will see me on this matter.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  So I've still got things going on because they've given the judge, gave him to this fancy guy, this lawyer, this shark.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  And I've got putting in motions.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  Now, fans are just putting in the inventory of my parents' estate and smithing a quarter of a million dollars.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Now, I'm writing a motion here.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  Who's the executor of the estate?
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  He's a guardian now.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  He's my father's lawyer.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  Okay.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  Do you believe he has something to do with this?
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I believe everything he has something to do with it.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  Wait, I didn't understand that.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  I believe, well, you mean the theft of the money?
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  Yes.
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  He's in with my brother, absolutely.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  Have you filed anything criminal on these guys?
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  That's what I've been trying to do.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  As a prosecutor, I wrote the detective of my mother's case a couple years ago.
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  I'm looking at these emails and letters and the detective looked back and he said,
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  Sorry.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  Waste of time.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  Those guys are waste of time.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  Okay.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  They're all corrupt.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  Yeah, they're all in together.
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  Yeah, so what we can help you do with this show is we can help you become their worst nightmare.
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  And you have abilities that they will do everything they can to hide from you.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  If you have reason to believe this lawyer has been siphoning money out of this account,
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  you need to file criminally against him with prosecutor attorney.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  And the way you do that is don't go talk to the prosecutor.
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Prepare a criminal complaint and a affidavit in support and mail it to the prosecutor.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  Certified, return receipt so you can be sure he got it.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  And when he refuses to act, then you take the complaint to some magistrate, any magistrate.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  And I generally bushwhacked the judge in the court, but I don't suggest you do that.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Just mail it to him, certified mail.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  It's better to go to a higher level judge than a lower level judge.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  District judge would be nice.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  Send it to a district judge certified mail.
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Make sure that the complaint has been verified by a notary.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  Okay.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  The judge will send it back to you with a really kind letter giving you all sorts of sage advice as to what you should do with this complaint.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  He'll tell you who you should file it with.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  So you file with whoever he tells you to, but don't file the complaint you sent to him.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  File a complaint against him for misfeasance in office for failing to perform his duty as a magistrate.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  And whoever he sent you to, ask him to arrest him.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  The district judge?
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  Yeah, I just filed criminal charges against the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Oh, that was a hoot.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  Four years ago, we have two high courts in Texas.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  One for criminal, one for civil.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  Supreme handles civil, Court of Criminal Appeals handles criminal.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  15 judges on the Court of Criminal Appeals got them all put in front of a grand jury.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  Almost got him. That was four years ago.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  And that was a hoot.
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  You can do that.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  You will not win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  And that's all there is to that.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  That's the way it is. That is the way it has always been.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  You'll win your case if you get the politics on your side, and this is what we do.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  This is how you generate a little politics, and all the politics is vocal.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  All the politics that counts is local.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  Oh, yeah, all these people. The judge that started this mess off, he has no oaths.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  I just found out last year, he does not have an oath.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  A certified oath of office, it's not filed.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Okay, okay, hold on, hold on, we're about to go break. This is Randy Kelton's demonstration.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Albert Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock inner food, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So get them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  I've got to quit doing that.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  Just Randy Kelton, rule of law radio.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  Our four-hour info marathon, we're talking to Rosanna in Ohio.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  And I know you have a lot of issues.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  And so far, because of the way you've presented them, I take it you're not terribly sophisticated in the legal side of the probate issue.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  Is that true?
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  I think I'm pretty, I think I've got this down.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  I was just learning as I go.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  Now I know a lot.
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  Okay.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  The thing you haven't spoken to me of where specific actions, requirements, what they were supposed to do, what they didn't do.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  That's what I was looking for.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  The courts?
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  The lawyers in the courts.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  Understand that in probate, the lawyers, both sides, their whole purpose is to see how much of the estate they can swallow.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  Exactly.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  So knowing that, and maybe part of it is if you don't listen to a show all the time, you don't understand so much where we go.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:24.000]  I tend to be more interested in the actors than the issues.
[01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  I need the issues enough to get an idea of what the actors should be doing.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  And once I find what they should be doing, now we can start kicking their behinds.
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  These guys trying to see how much money they can swallow out of the estate.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  So it's all about the money.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  It is.
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  So let's have them out with that money thing.
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  I would bar grieve the attorneys on the other side every time they breathed.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  The guardian.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  Okay, what is he?
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  Is he still a guardian for your father?
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Yes, in September when I filed the emergency guardianship for my father after my brother's arrest,
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  then the lawyer became the guardian right during the hearing.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  At that point, my father has no legal counsel, and he's allowed to be counsel.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  Then who is causing your father to appear before the court without counsel?
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Would that be the judge?
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:37.000]  You've got to say my father is mentally impaired.
[01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  He just goes where he's told.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  No, no, you didn't answer my question.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  Who is causing your father to appear before the court without counsel?
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Because I filed emergency guardianship for my father.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  Who is causing your father to appear before the court without counsel?
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  Well, it would be the judge and the lawyer.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  Okay, it has to be the judge.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  Is the guardian a lawyer?
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  Okay, he is a lawyer.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:17.000]  But as guardian, can he not represent your father?
[01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  No.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  Nope.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:20.000]  Okay.
[01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  He cannot represent her, huh?
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  Then file criminal charges against the judge.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  You see, judges and lawyers, at least prosecutors, have carved out immunity from themselves from civil litigation.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  You don't have that remedy against them.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  For non-prosecutors, well, actually prosecutors alike, you have bar grievances.
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  Now, you would never hear these guys talk about bar grievances.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  Even if you file one against them, generally they won't say a word about it.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  They won't say a word about it because they're forbidden to.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  And they never mentioned bar grievances because they don't want anybody to know about them.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Bar grievances are bad news.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  You filed those in federal, right?
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  Yes, this is probate.
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  This would be state.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  No, no, no.
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  But I'm saying if you do a bar grievance, are you talking about like with the jail?
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  No, no, no.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  No, you do it in the state, state.
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:33.000]  But if you file a bar grievance against the lawyer,
[01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  the state bar is going to get that grievance and they're going to throw it in the trash.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  Yeah.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  And they're going to send you this little form letter said we examined into your complaint
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  and find it does not lie to the level of misconduct.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  Exactly.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  I get one of those and say, oh, goody, goody, goody, goody, goody.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  Okay, consider this.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  You buy a new car.
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  You go down to Walmart.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  You go inside, come out.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  Somebody's bastifendering.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  You call the insurance company to come out and fix it.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  You go down there next month, come out.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  Somebody's bastifendering.
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  You call the insurance company to come out and fix it.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  They cancel.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  Your fault, their fault, nobody's fault.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  They don't care.
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  You are an unacceptable risk.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  Lawyers pay between on the order of 30 to 40,000 a year in malpractice insurance.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  And this is how it works.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  If you file a grievance against a lawyer, the state bar is going to get that grievance
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  and throw it in the trash.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  We know it.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  They know it.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  Right.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  Their insurance company knows it.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  So how is the insurance company to gauges level risk?
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  By valid bar grievances?
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  Heck, they throw them all in the trash.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  Right.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  By the numbers.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  If you grieve that lawyer, because the dirty rotten petty fogger shister parts his hair
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  on the left, if you can believe that, he should be sanctioned.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  They're going to get that.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  And they're going to say, we examine into your allegation and find it does not rise to the
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  level of miscontact and trash it.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  And the insurance company is going to double this premium.
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  If it's his first year in practice, they'll cancel.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  If he gets two bar grievances any one year, if he's been practicing 20 years, they'll
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  cancel.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  I had a lawyer tell me, that is grossly unfair.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  And I'm standing there grin.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  He said, oh, I knew I shouldn't have told you that.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  It makes lawyers crazy when you file grievances against them.
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Even though they don't go through.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  Pardon me?
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  Even though they don't go through.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  That's the whole point.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  The insurance carrier can't gauge the level of risk for a particular lawyer by valid bar
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  grievances.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  They throw them all in the trash so they don't know what's valid, what's not.
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  They go by the numbers.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  This is consistent all over the country.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Bar grievances are bad news.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  Judicial conduct complains against judges.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:35.000]  It raises their bond rating.
[01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  They're all insured as well.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  They call it a bond, but it's still insured policy.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  And it goes on their record.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  It puts a mark against them that never, ever goes away.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  Even though it doesn't pass.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  Even though it doesn't pass, doesn't matter.
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:06.000]  Everybody knows that the supposed oversight agencies are absolutely worthless.
[01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Everybody knows that.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  Nobody pays any attention to whether or not the agency issues sanctions or not because
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  they know they're all corrupt.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  The only time the issue sanctions is if somebody is more politically powerful than you is upset
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  at you.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  It's all corrupt.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  But the insurance companies, they know it's corrupt.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  But when those complaints can, why don't they just not turn the complaints in?
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  The entry complaints?
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  That's a good part.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  Because it's in the contract that if they get a grievance, they are required to notify
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  the insurance company or they don't have any coverage.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  So if you're paying $30,000 to $40,000 a year for coverage, you're going to have to tell
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  them or you're paying $30,000 to $40,000 a year for nothing.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  Can I even find out who the insurance company is so I can call them and say, hey, have you
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  gotten five complaints because that's how many I've turned in?
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  You've done five already?
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  Good for you.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  I filed one against this judge and I got the complaint back from the disciplinary counsel
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  in December and they said, we don't find that the judge who doesn't have an oath, we don't
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  find that as a misconduct or an unethical issue.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  Excuse me?
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  You should file criminally against him for impersonating a judicial officer.
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  He doesn't because he didn't file it within 20 days of him taking office.
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  I've written the governor and the governor won't do anything.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  No, file a criminal complaint.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  It's all about politics.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  Now, when you say file a criminal complaint, aren't you saying...
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  You filed a complaint with the prosecuting attorney against this judge and the prosecutor's
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  going to refuse to do anything.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:54.000]  Right.
[01:56:54.000 --> 01:56:56.000]  I'm going to put an appetite for the court.
[01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  At least you hope he does because now you get plausible deniability.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  Okay.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  And now you get to file a complaint against this prosecutor with the highest level judge
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  you can find and ask that judge to arrest the prosecutor.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:18.000]  And he's going to refuse to act.
[01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  Now you take the complaint against him and send it to the local grand jury.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:25.000]  Local grand jury.
[01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  You say, you can't give it to the prosecutor.
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  You file a complaint against this district judge for not prosecuting the prosecutor.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:35.000]  He's disqualified.
[01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  The prosecutor's disqualified.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  And the district judge against whom you're filing, he's going to be an unhappy camper.
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  But he's going to be unhappy at you if you can't do anything about that.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:57.000]  And I suggest you go to a high level judge first.
[01:57:57.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  This keeps anybody from messing with you.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  When I tell people to do that, they get kind of concerned.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  What if he gets the police after me?
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  I live in a small county.
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  And a friend of mine's over the sheriff's department asked me what I did to the sheriff.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  And I said, I haven't done anything to him lately.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Why?
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  He said, well, we had a road call this morning.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  He asked who knew Randy Kelton, about half of us raised our hands.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  And he said, you're not to stop him.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  You are not to cite him.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  And whatever you do, don't put that SOP in my jail.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  And that's because I filed criminal charges against the district judge with the attorney general.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  And the first officer that talked to me, I accused the judge of sending him out to harass me.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:41.000]  And it terrified all of them.
[01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Dennis Stevens, Eddie Craig, Lula Radio.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  Hang on.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:58:54.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate.
[01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.000 --> 01:59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:54.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:22.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com