[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  Can reality TV make you dumber?
[00:05.000 --> 00:10.000]  New research suggests watching people do stupid things can dumb you down more than you realize.
[00:10.000 --> 00:16.000]  And Dr. Kauffernalbrecht, back with the details on the mind-numbing effects of reality TV in a moment.
[00:16.000 --> 00:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:33.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:33.000 --> 00:38.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:46.000 --> 00:51.000]  20-somethings drunk in nightclubs, teenage girls having babies with no husbands or money.
[00:51.000 --> 00:58.000]  Catty drama queens sniping at their families. Every night, Americans tune into the mindless universe of reality TV.
[00:58.000 --> 01:04.000]  But does watching such nonsense do more than just entertain us? Researchers in Australia say yes.
[01:04.000 --> 01:11.000]  They had volunteers watch a soccer hooligan get drunk with friends, get into a fight, and spend the whole next day sleeping.
[01:11.000 --> 01:17.000]  Then they took a knowledge test on an unrelated topic. They scored well below people who would not watch the show.
[01:17.000 --> 01:22.000]  So the next time Jersey Shore comes on, switch it off. Your brain will like you better for it.
[01:22.000 --> 01:27.000]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:34.000 --> 01:40.000]  Financial pop quiz. What company makes more money in a year than Google and Walmart combined?
[01:40.000 --> 01:43.000]  In terms of earnings, it's like its own small nation.
[01:43.000 --> 01:47.000]  Under Dr. Catherine Albrecht in a moment, I'll tell you who it is.
[02:14.000 --> 02:20.000]  I almost rule the world. My devices are everywhere, and people line up on city streets for my new releases.
[02:20.000 --> 02:27.000]  Who am I? Ding, ding. The answer is Apple Inc., the real big Apple, with all due respect to New York City.
[02:27.000 --> 02:36.000]  With sales last year of $128 billion in stock value that dwarfs both Exxon and Microsoft, Apple is king of the corporate Apple cart.
[02:36.000 --> 02:43.000]  The company earns more than 160 countries and sells 11 iPads every second.
[02:43.000 --> 02:48.000]  The 72 million iPhones sold last year alone weigh as much as the Eiffel Tower.
[02:48.000 --> 02:53.000]  That's scary big, but look out world, one rotten Apple could spoil the whole barrel.
[02:53.000 --> 02:58.000]  Under Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[02:58.000 --> 03:03.000]  Living alone is no fun. For one thing, you have to do all the chores by yourself,
[03:03.000 --> 03:08.000]  but new evidence suggests it may also increase the risk of becoming depressed.
[03:08.000 --> 03:31.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:31.000 --> 03:38.000]  Experts say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[03:38.000 --> 03:45.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[03:45.000 --> 03:49.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[03:49.000 --> 03:58.000]  We all know the elderly are more prone to depression if they live alone, but new research suggests that same pattern may also affect younger working age adults.
[03:58.000 --> 04:05.000]  We have 3,500 people age 30 to 65. Researchers found that a quarter of those living alone took antidepressants.
[04:05.000 --> 04:09.000]  That's almost double the rate of those who live with spouses, family, or roommates.
[04:09.000 --> 04:15.000]  Did living alone cause depression, or do depression-prone people simply prefer solitude?
[04:15.000 --> 04:23.000]  Both explanations are plausible, but there's one important wake-up call to all of us to reach out to friends, family members, and neighbors who live alone.
[04:23.000 --> 04:27.000]  Some human contact could make all the difference in their world.
[04:27.000 --> 04:34.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[04:34.000 --> 04:43.000]  Can reality TV make you dumber? New research suggests watching people do stupid things can dumb you down more than you realize.
[04:43.000 --> 04:49.000]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the details on the mind-suming effects of reality TV in a moment.
[04:49.000 --> 04:55.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[04:55.000 --> 05:00.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[05:00.000 --> 05:08.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[05:08.000 --> 05:15.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[05:15.000 --> 05:18.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[05:18.000 --> 05:24.000]  20-somethings drunk in nightclubs, teenage girls having babies with no husbands or money.
[05:24.000 --> 05:31.000]  Catty drama queens sniping at their families. Every night, Americans tune into the mindless universe of reality TV.
[05:31.000 --> 05:37.000]  But does watching such nonsense do more than just entertain us? Researchers in Australia say yes.
[05:37.000 --> 05:44.000]  They had volunteers watch a soccer hooligan get drunk with friends, get into a fight, and spend the whole next day sleeping.
[05:44.000 --> 05:50.000]  Then they took a knowledge test on an unrelated topic. They scored well below people who would not watch the show.
[05:50.000 --> 05:55.000]  So the next time Jersey Shore comes on, switch it off. Your brain will like you better for it.
[05:55.000 --> 06:21.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[06:21.000 --> 06:32.000]  6 o'clock news says somebody's been shot. Somebody's been abused. Somebody blew up a building. Somebody told a car. Somebody got away.
[06:32.000 --> 06:41.000]  Somebody didn't get too far. They didn't get too far.
[06:41.000 --> 07:03.000]  So one of the things you want the officer to admit to is that he was actually tailgating your car or he had to have been traveling at some safe distance behind the car.
[07:03.000 --> 07:17.000]  And how do we gauge what is a safe distance? We use the driver's ed rule of thumb that for every 10 miles of speed, the car behind you must be a distance of at least one car length away.
[07:17.000 --> 07:25.000]  Now, most of the places where these officers are going to pull you over, the speed limit is at least 30, if not 35.
[07:25.000 --> 07:36.000]  And in other cases, 45. So that would mean that they would have to be at least three and a half to four and a half car lengths away.
[07:36.000 --> 07:52.000]  So that means what to us exactly. That means that the officer's car, if it's traveling at a safe distance and the officer is not actually guilty of tailgating, thus causing you to, you know, have to do the things you do,
[07:52.000 --> 08:00.000]  then the officer is at least 65 to 75 feet behind you.
[08:00.000 --> 08:10.000]  Okay. So the problem here is when he initiates the stop for the tail lamp on the, or the lamp on the license plate.
[08:10.000 --> 08:22.000]  The transportation code specifically says that the tail lamp only has to illuminate the plate in order to make it visible from a maximum of 50 feet away.
[08:22.000 --> 08:36.000]  So if the officer is at least 65 feet away and he is initiating a traffic stop for a license plate he can't read at 65 feet, then the stop is illegal.
[08:36.000 --> 08:42.000]  Because the law requires that it only be visible from a distance of 50 feet.
[08:42.000 --> 08:48.000]  So the officer not being able to see it at 65 is not a violation.
[08:48.000 --> 09:01.000]  So when he initiates a traffic stop at the 65 feet and says that he couldn't see your tail lamp, he wants your license registration and proof of financial responsibility, the stop is illegal.
[09:01.000 --> 09:13.000]  Okay. So that right there is grounds to have the case thrown out and you bring that issue up to the judge. Excuse me, judge, but the officer just testified that he was 65 feet away.
[09:13.000 --> 09:19.000]  The law specifically requires that the license plate lamp only work from 50 feet away.
[09:19.000 --> 09:27.000]  So just exactly where was the officer's probable cause and what made the stop illegal?
[09:27.000 --> 09:38.000]  Now, if you want to go to merits, that's one way to do it. In fact, it's the best way to do it, especially if you're looking at a possible DUI.
[09:38.000 --> 09:43.000]  Now, there are other ways to go through this. Let's look at something else.
[09:43.000 --> 09:46.000]  The officer claims you're driving erratically rather than that.
[09:46.000 --> 09:56.000]  But again, if the officer is tailgating your car, then your erratic driving is caused by the fact that you're being tailgated.
[09:56.000 --> 10:04.000]  So the officer is in fact responsible for the way that you're having to maneuver your car, not you.
[10:04.000 --> 10:14.000]  And again, that negates his accusation because he is in fact the cause of what you're having to do, not you or any inebriated condition.
[10:14.000 --> 10:29.000]  Now, when you actually go through and they want to say this traffic violation occurred, if you've actually studied the actual offense they're charging you with, you would find that most of the elements required to prove the charge did not occur.
[10:29.000 --> 10:36.000]  And so once again, you can show that the officer fabricated the charge for the purpose of initiating the stop.
[10:36.000 --> 10:48.000]  It all comes down to knowing what these statutes are and how they apply, who they apply to, and what the elements of the charge are that would make it stick or not stick to somebody engaged in transportation.
[10:48.000 --> 11:01.000]  Now, the same thing goes when you refuse to give a blood or alcohol or blood or urine sample or breathalyzer or anything else relating to being inebriated or whether you are or aren't.
[11:01.000 --> 11:06.000]  Okay? The officer initiates an illegal stop.
[11:06.000 --> 11:23.000]  The officer then initiates sobriety test, which you pass, or if you did happen to fail one on just one simple instance but then managed to repeat it and complete it successfully, then you didn't fail.
[11:23.000 --> 11:32.000]  Therefore, the officer never developed probable cause because you passed the sobriety test.
[11:32.000 --> 11:41.000]  I mean, any officer would have to be an idiot to say, well, you passed four but you flunked one part of one of five.
[11:41.000 --> 11:47.000]  So I'm charging you with public intoxication or I'm charging you with DUI.
[11:47.000 --> 11:59.000]  I mean, that's idiotic. You passed every test except for one part of one when clearly the average means of the test shows that you were not drinking or you were not inebriated.
[11:59.000 --> 12:01.000]  Okay?
[12:01.000 --> 12:11.000]  So when you actually go through this and you show officer, isn't it true that I did that and you allowed me to do it again and that time I passed it without incident?
[12:11.000 --> 12:21.000]  Well, yeah, but you didn't do it right the first time. Yeah, but I did it right the second and third time, didn't I? And you arrested me anyway, didn't you?
[12:21.000 --> 12:30.000]  Okay? That right there is going to show that if they did take blood or breathalyzer samples that they were illegally seized.
[12:30.000 --> 12:45.000]  He never established probable cause. And then you have the administrative side of this idiocy where they're actually attempting to administratively revoke your license before you've even been proved guilty of the offense.
[12:45.000 --> 12:56.000]  And right here, the main excuse they're using is you refuse to take a blood or alcohol test after you were arrested and charged with this alleged offense.
[12:56.000 --> 13:03.000]  Well, what happened to having to prove that you were guilty of the offense before you can be punished for it?
[13:03.000 --> 13:08.000]  Oh, wait, you mean they don't have to do that on these administrative things? No, they don't.
[13:08.000 --> 13:21.000]  Well, then what's the problem? I'm being punished and there's no judicial review of the punishment and it's not adjudicated and I didn't get a trial by jury as is my right before I can be punished.
[13:21.000 --> 13:26.000]  Oh, my goodness, what are they doing wrong?
[13:26.000 --> 13:41.000]  How about an illegal unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties, an administrative or legislative determination of guilt without judicial review?
[13:41.000 --> 13:51.000]  That's what a bill of pains and penalties or a bill of attainer are. How idiotic are these higher courts that don't understand that concept?
[13:51.000 --> 14:01.000]  They try to isolate only specific things and say, only these things constitute a bill of attainer. However, or a bill of pains and penalties.
[14:01.000 --> 14:11.000]  However, the conditions are exactly the same in this other situation. Oh, well, that doesn't actually count as that because we ruled that it isn't under these conditions.
[14:11.000 --> 14:23.000]  Who gave these idiots that power? Oh, wait, we did by not objecting when they tried to usurp it and exercise it to our detriment. That's who did it.
[14:23.000 --> 14:35.000]  So, folks, if you're going to learn how to fight these cases, you need to be doing it before it becomes a problem. Not after.
[14:35.000 --> 14:44.000]  I mean, I'm actually extremely disappointed in most of the people here in Austin. I've been conducting my class here for two daggum years.
[14:44.000 --> 14:55.000]  And for the past month, the classes have gone from an average of about 10 people per class, which, by the way, is way too low.
[14:55.000 --> 15:04.000]  It's obvious to me that the people of Austin, for somebody that is so active in all of the political things going on in this town,
[15:04.000 --> 15:16.000]  they're too willfully ignorant to come to classes that would teach them how to stand up for their rights against the cops, against the city, against the inspectors, against, you know, the code enforcement.
[15:16.000 --> 15:30.000]  And they won't come learn how to defend themselves before it becomes a problem. I am completely disillusioned with the Patriot community having a lick of common sense about being prepared in advance.
[15:30.000 --> 15:41.000]  I mean, it's ridiculous. But here we are. I look around my classes past Sunday, three people, three whole people.
[15:41.000 --> 15:50.000]  Now, granted, a couple of people told me in advance they wouldn't be able to make it, but still, that's ridiculous.
[15:50.000 --> 16:00.000]  But they sure show up in droves when they get tickets. But then what are they going to do? They've already screwed themselves over at the initial stop.
[16:00.000 --> 16:07.000]  They've already screwed themselves over by going in and pleading before they ever came to the class. What am I supposed to do for you now?
[16:07.000 --> 16:14.000]  You've already put the noose around your neck, jumped off the podium with a gun in your hand, a barrel in your mouth, your finger on the trigger.
[16:14.000 --> 16:21.000]  And now that's at the end, hey, what is there left to save you with?
[16:21.000 --> 16:33.000]  It's time to be smart about how to fight, folks. And smart means you are trained and ready before you step in the ring to match your ability against the other guy.
[16:33.000 --> 16:43.000]  Okay? So let's get down to business and get educated and get smart about how to handle this stuff. Get people into the class. That's what it's for.
[16:43.000 --> 16:53.000]  Alright, folks. Chuck, I see you there on the board. Hang on. We'll start with you when we get back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:53.000 --> 17:17.000]  Hang in there, folks. We'll be right back on the other side.
[17:23.000 --> 17:33.000]  We're all breaking Tangerine. Tangerine, Tangerine, Tangerine, Tangerine.
[17:33.000 --> 17:41.000]  We're all breaking Tangerine. Tangerine, Tangerine, Tangerine.
[17:41.000 --> 17:48.000]  Order Beyond Tangerine and other great young Jevity products at LogosRadioNetwork.com by clicking on the Tangerine banner.
[17:48.000 --> 17:55.000]  Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[17:55.000 --> 17:57.000]  So what do you say, Elvis?
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  Tangerine, Tangerine, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute,
[18:20.000 --> 18:26.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.000 --> 18:33.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:11.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:11.000 --> 19:21.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio.com.
[19:21.000 --> 19:47.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. I do apologize, but I found that we did have a little bit of technical difficulty there on that first segment.
[19:47.000 --> 19:53.000]  We had a couple minutes of dead air, so we do apologize for that. We will be fixing that in the archive, I'm pretty sure.
[19:53.000 --> 19:57.000]  If not, then, you know, just paste the sign on my forehead that screw up.
[19:57.000 --> 20:04.000]  Okay. Alright, that being said, we're going to take a moment here and talk to Chuck.
[20:04.000 --> 20:09.000]  Alright Chuck, what's your problem? And let's see what we can do with it.
[20:09.000 --> 20:11.000]  Hey brother, how did you hear me?
[20:11.000 --> 20:13.000]  I hear you just fine.
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  Okay. I'm on Skype, that's why I was double-checking. First, can I ask you a question?
[20:17.000 --> 20:21.000]  Do you mind if I use this on a Blog Talk radio show?
[20:21.000 --> 20:23.000]  Full attribution, of course.
[20:23.000 --> 20:32.000]  No, I don't have any problem with it. That would be Deborah's call, but since we freely disseminate the archives, I don't see why it would be a problem.
[20:32.000 --> 20:35.000]  That's generally the way we are.
[20:35.000 --> 20:49.000]  Okay, here's what we're up against. When you go into court, when there's a TRO for an adult autistic child, my wife has a daughter who is autistic,
[20:49.000 --> 20:57.000]  and her ex has been being the vindictive guy that he is, has decided to try and separate her from her mother using me as the weapon.
[20:57.000 --> 21:13.000]  Now, I have a fairly checkered past in the past. Some of the TRO is based on my past history, and lies about a conversation with which we have had on the phone,
[21:13.000 --> 21:16.000]  which I, by the way, have recordings of.
[21:16.000 --> 21:18.000]  We being who?
[21:18.000 --> 21:23.000]  That I made recordings of his conversations with me.
[21:23.000 --> 21:29.000]  Okay. So the recordings are between you and the husband, not you and the mother of the daughter?
[21:29.000 --> 21:37.000]  Right. This way, whenever, I mean, I can easily prove if the judge would listen to the audio, which I'm sure he won't.
[21:37.000 --> 21:48.000]  Well, you can certainly ask for in-camera inspection, even though it can't be admitted as evidence, unless you get the husband in there to validate that it's his voice on the tape.
[21:48.000 --> 21:53.000]  Because you can't ask the judge to do an in-camera inspection, you just won't be able to admit it into evidence.
[21:53.000 --> 21:55.000]  What is an in-camera inspection?
[21:55.000 --> 22:04.000]  It means that he agrees to look at it outside the presence of any jury, but in the presence of both opposing parties.
[22:04.000 --> 22:05.000]  Oh, really?
[22:05.000 --> 22:10.000]  And he can use that to make the basis of his decision.
[22:10.000 --> 22:15.000]  Do I make this motion before or during this? We're hitting this Wednesday morning.
[22:15.000 --> 22:22.000]  I would put it in writing and file it ahead of time and give the judge the ability to determine whether or not he wishes to hear it.
[22:22.000 --> 22:29.000]  But now try to point out the significance of what you have and how it's relevant when you ask him to do so.
[22:29.000 --> 22:32.000]  By certified mail or...
[22:32.000 --> 22:36.000]  Well, if you're not going to hand deliver it, then it's always done by certified mail.
[22:36.000 --> 22:39.000]  Oh, okay. So I can hand deliver it and have someone sign for it?
[22:39.000 --> 22:46.000]  You can file it with the court and have it stamped as received and filed with the court. Just make sure you retain copies.
[22:46.000 --> 22:49.000]  Oh, sweet boy. I've got lots of copies.
[22:49.000 --> 22:52.000]  I mean, in this case, you are a party to the case, right?
[22:52.000 --> 22:56.000]  Well, yes, because I am me. You know, the TRO is on me.
[22:56.000 --> 23:00.000]  Okay. Then, yeah, most assuredly, you can file. Just go to the clerk of the court.
[23:00.000 --> 23:05.000]  File the copy of the motion requesting the judge do an in-camera inspection of the recordings you have.
[23:05.000 --> 23:12.000]  Because they're relevant in this way, they bear upon the relevancy and applicability of the TRO.
[23:12.000 --> 23:23.000]  And your hopes is that from the recordings, the judge will determine that the facts in the TRO are being misrepresented for the purpose of causing you harm.
[23:23.000 --> 23:27.000]  Okay. So bear with me just a moment here.
[23:27.000 --> 23:34.000]  For clarity of the word that you're using, that is camera, camera in...
[23:34.000 --> 23:38.000]  Camera, like in a take a picture camera.
[23:38.000 --> 23:39.000]  Okay.
[23:39.000 --> 23:43.000]  In camera inspection.
[23:43.000 --> 23:49.000]  Okay. And now let's move on to the day of court.
[23:49.000 --> 23:59.000]  I was speaking with Larry earlier today and he was advising me on whether to stand, whether not to stand,
[23:59.000 --> 24:04.000]  to challenge every, you know, everything that they say.
[24:04.000 --> 24:11.000]  In other words, you know, I don't remember the phraseology that he used.
[24:11.000 --> 24:15.000]  In fact, not in...
[24:15.000 --> 24:16.000]  Larry helped me out here.
[24:16.000 --> 24:19.000]  A fact not in evidence.
[24:19.000 --> 24:21.000]  There we go. Facts not in evidence.
[24:21.000 --> 24:26.000]  And it was fascinating to me, because I originally thought, look, I'm just going to go and tell him, look over there.
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000]  I said, there's a written statement, here's the audio, and you'll go screw yourself.
[24:29.000 --> 24:34.000]  And Larry was convincing me that that's not the way to handle it.
[24:34.000 --> 24:37.000]  No, that would absolutely be correct. That's not the way to handle it.
[24:37.000 --> 24:46.000]  Unless, of course, you want the TRO made permanent and your next visit to the jail also semi-permanent for contempt of court.
[24:46.000 --> 24:48.000]  Yeah, and that's kind of...
[24:48.000 --> 24:51.000]  That's why I'm going to have half of this in video cameras who are optitiously placed around.
[24:51.000 --> 24:56.000]  You know, I'll put that on YouTube, but I'm not new to the fight.
[24:56.000 --> 24:59.000]  I'm just new to this phase of the fight.
[24:59.000 --> 25:05.000]  And I'm with the rest of the perfect community that neglected this area of the fight.
[25:05.000 --> 25:09.000]  There's so many areas that were under attack.
[25:09.000 --> 25:11.000]  So, you know, your earlier segment...
[25:11.000 --> 25:14.000]  Well, if you find an area where we're not, that's where we ought to be standing.
[25:14.000 --> 25:18.000]  But since there isn't one, move point.
[25:18.000 --> 25:22.000]  Yeah, I agree. And this is one we need to start paying a little bit more attention to.
[25:22.000 --> 25:26.000]  I know I will. And we'll start bringing it out on my end a little bit as well.
[25:26.000 --> 25:28.000]  Would you walk me through what I'm looking at?
[25:28.000 --> 25:34.000]  Because now I have been to criminal court on the long end of it a few times.
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000]  But I've never really had much to do with the civil side.
[25:39.000 --> 25:42.000]  What am I looking at and how should...
[25:42.000 --> 25:46.000]  Well, this does not sound like it's civil side. This is family side.
[25:46.000 --> 25:56.000]  Family court is probably the second most corrupt part of court there is.
[25:56.000 --> 26:03.000]  I mean, a man in family court stands about as much chance of getting a fair shake in that court
[26:03.000 --> 26:09.000]  as a vampire does at the suntanning convention.
[26:09.000 --> 26:17.000]  But in this case, this was a man trying to separate me and another man from his daughter
[26:17.000 --> 26:27.000]  based on my history, you know, previous criminal record, to be honest, and then a pack of lies.
[26:27.000 --> 26:32.000]  It would be very hard if I wanted to really fight this hard. It would be a matter of...
[26:32.000 --> 26:37.000]  Well, the problem is, is the way that the system has been rearranged.
[26:37.000 --> 26:41.000]  Normally, when you paid your dues, it was a done deal.
[26:41.000 --> 26:46.000]  Nowadays, your dues once paid are always due and owing.
[26:46.000 --> 26:55.000]  Just because you've been convicted before, the judge will now look at that and use that any way they see fit.
[26:55.000 --> 26:58.000]  And you need to understand that.
[26:58.000 --> 27:07.000]  So even though you've done your time, you've paid society back, so on and so forth, that's never forgiven,
[27:07.000 --> 27:12.000]  which is completely opposite the way it's supposed to work.
[27:12.000 --> 27:20.000]  But that is how they've got it set up. Everything you've done in the past will continue to follow you to the future,
[27:20.000 --> 27:26.000]  especially when it comes to stuff like family court and criminal court.
[27:26.000 --> 27:31.000]  You know, I'm really not willing to, you know, inconvenience my friends.
[27:31.000 --> 27:37.000]  You know, just speaking my behalf, at least not in this, you know, I'm going to be put on trial here.
[27:37.000 --> 27:41.000]  And frankly, thankfully, I resent it.
[27:41.000 --> 27:48.000]  But I could win on that basis, possibly, by bringing in a whole raft of people to talk about who the man they know is.
[27:48.000 --> 27:50.000]  But that's not the route that I want to go.
[27:50.000 --> 27:57.000]  The route that I would like to go is shut the lawyer down, like Larry was talking about this morning.
[27:57.000 --> 28:01.000]  Force him into a later court date if they want to try again.
[28:01.000 --> 28:04.000]  Then maybe bring in the big guns and all my friends.
[28:04.000 --> 28:09.000]  Okay, well, what does forcing him into a later court date get you?
[28:09.000 --> 28:11.000]  Cost him more money.
[28:11.000 --> 28:16.000]  Not if they come back and ask that that money be reimbursed from you, it doesn't.
[28:16.000 --> 28:25.000]  Well, true enough, true enough, you know, so I'm just not sure how would be wise to proceed.
[28:25.000 --> 28:34.000]  Now, circumstances being what they are in the United States and the most dangerous thing a man can do is to marry a woman with a daughter.
[28:34.000 --> 28:36.000]  That's just nothing more dangerous than any man.
[28:36.000 --> 28:42.000]  I'm starting to believe the most dangerous thing a man can do is get anywhere near a woman, period, but still.
[28:42.000 --> 28:49.000]  Well, you have in that mind, whenever you have, if you ever do, you'll shine out just how right you are.
[28:49.000 --> 29:06.000]  But all that being said, we are at this point going to let him, you know, take over the responsibility of his daughter, which has abrogated for, you know, 18 years and they choke on it for a while.
[29:06.000 --> 29:09.000]  Okay, well, no, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[29:09.000 --> 29:13.000]  We're getting off track here right now. We don't give a crap what this guy wants to do.
[29:13.000 --> 29:16.000]  The situation here involves you in this hearing.
[29:16.000 --> 29:20.000]  So let's stick to that because that's because that's the thing you've got to address.
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  It doesn't matter what he winds up with. He's not in this fight right now. You are.
[29:25.000 --> 29:26.000]  Okay.
[29:26.000 --> 29:30.000]  So right now, what is your game plan for going in there?
[29:30.000 --> 29:37.000]  I mean, I don't know what advice you were given, so I don't know how it's going to work for you or how it isn't.
[29:37.000 --> 29:39.000]  Okay, come back after we break.
[29:39.000 --> 29:44.000]  Yeah. Well, hang on and we'll finish this up. Chris, I see you there. Don't drop off. We'll pick you up when we get done with Chuck.
[29:44.000 --> 29:51.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[29:51.000 --> 29:56.000]  This is Eddie Craig on the Monday Night Traffic Show. Hang in there. We will be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:05.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm not a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  And the father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:30.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:30.000 --> 30:38.000]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves,
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  while removing heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[30:46.000 --> 30:50.000]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach, and colon.
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[30:53.000 --> 31:01.000]  Visit us at hempUSA.org or call 908-69-12608 today.
[31:01.000 --> 31:04.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[31:04.000 --> 31:07.000]  but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:15.000]  Yes.
[31:15.000 --> 31:18.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like
[31:18.000 --> 31:23.000]  Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin. They even stock inner food, Burkey products,
[31:23.000 --> 31:25.000]  and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:33.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:36.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:36.000 --> 31:42.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility
[31:42.000 --> 31:44.000]  just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:53.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:53.000 --> 32:15.000]  Get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:15.000 --> 32:35.000]  All right, folks, we are back this year's Rule of Law Radio.
[32:35.000 --> 32:40.000]  Okay, we are going to try to get this finished up here with Chuck.
[32:40.000 --> 32:49.000]  Chuck, now, if I'm understanding all this correctly, the instructions you were given was to object to everything.
[32:49.000 --> 32:52.000]  Let me adjust that slightly.
[32:52.000 --> 33:00.000]  Object intelligently and promptly, but not necessarily to everything.
[33:00.000 --> 33:02.000]  And here's why.
[33:02.000 --> 33:11.000]  If you object to the point of objecting at the wrong time for no explicable reason, the judge will see you as being disruptive,
[33:11.000 --> 33:14.000]  and the judge is not going to like you.
[33:14.000 --> 33:15.000]  Understood.
[33:15.000 --> 33:17.000]  Okay?
[33:17.000 --> 33:26.000]  Now, what you're going to object to is any statement by the other party that there is no evidence before the court,
[33:26.000 --> 33:31.000]  and you're going to state it more or less, objection assumes facts not an evidence.
[33:31.000 --> 33:36.000]  This statement is unsubstantiated by any form of evidence whatsoever.
[33:36.000 --> 33:43.000]  I have contravening evidence in the form of these tapes that I filed a motion for you to examine in-camera, judge,
[33:43.000 --> 33:50.000]  so that you would understand that the conversation to which this statement relates proves the statement is false,
[33:50.000 --> 33:53.000]  if that is in fact the case.
[33:53.000 --> 33:54.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[33:54.000 --> 33:55.000]  It is.
[33:55.000 --> 33:56.000]  Okay.
[33:56.000 --> 33:59.000]  So that's how you want to address that.
[33:59.000 --> 34:02.000]  Object intelligently and properly.
[34:02.000 --> 34:06.000]  Not to everything, because not everything's objectionable.
[34:06.000 --> 34:11.000]  Otherwise, you sound like Bill Clinton trying to defend himself in the Monica Lewinsky case.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  Well, I object.
[34:13.000 --> 34:18.000]  I've never had sex with that woman, and that's really because it depends upon what is, is.
[34:18.000 --> 34:21.000]  Therefore, I object to the use of the word is.
[34:21.000 --> 34:23.000]  I object to the way it's spelled.
[34:23.000 --> 34:26.000]  I object to the fact that it only has two letters.
[34:26.000 --> 34:29.000]  I object to the fact that it was used in reference to my activities.
[34:29.000 --> 34:35.000]  See, those are all idiotic objections, but they're examples of exactly how it went.
[34:35.000 --> 34:36.000]  Right.
[34:36.000 --> 34:42.000]  Now, I expect to be vilified for my standing in the Patriot community.
[34:42.000 --> 34:44.000]  You know, I'm not going to.
[34:44.000 --> 34:46.000]  I really don't want to object to.
[34:46.000 --> 34:47.000]  Okay.
[34:47.000 --> 34:56.000]  Again, if anything comes up that is not pertinent to the issue before the court, you object to it to relevance.
[34:56.000 --> 34:59.000]  Objection, relevance.
[34:59.000 --> 35:03.000]  This has nothing to do with the issue before the court.
[35:03.000 --> 35:12.000]  Counsel is simply trying to introduce prejudicial content against me without any basis for it.
[35:12.000 --> 35:14.000]  See how it works?
[35:14.000 --> 35:16.000]  Very good.
[35:16.000 --> 35:18.000]  Very good.
[35:18.000 --> 35:20.000]  Okay.
[35:20.000 --> 35:29.000]  Well, I, if you, if you were shooting my wife is on the, on her hot phone on a conference call so that she had any questions asked.
[35:29.000 --> 35:34.000]  Tammy, if you have any questions you want to ask?
[35:34.000 --> 35:38.000]  Tammy.
[35:38.000 --> 35:40.000]  Do you have any questions you want to ask?
[35:40.000 --> 35:41.000]  Yeah.
[35:41.000 --> 35:42.000]  There I am.
[35:42.000 --> 35:47.000]  Yes, ma'am, I'm there.
[35:47.000 --> 35:52.000]  Can you get a little closer to whatever he's talking on because you're echoing badly where you're at?
[35:52.000 --> 35:54.000]  I'm moving.
[35:54.000 --> 35:57.000]  Oh, sorry about that.
[35:57.000 --> 36:15.000]  I understand that not to make an enemy of court, however, it's based upon what's in the QRO and what we are, what do you mean?
[36:15.000 --> 36:22.000]  Ma'am, do you by chance still have your, ma'am, do you still have your cell phone in your hand and active?
[36:22.000 --> 36:23.000]  Yes, I do.
[36:23.000 --> 36:31.000]  Okay, you need to move it away from whatever you're talking into because it's causing a lot of radio interference.
[36:31.000 --> 36:34.000]  Okay, let's see, is this better?
[36:34.000 --> 36:41.000]  Well, it's not buzzing at the moment like you're shaving your face, so yeah.
[36:41.000 --> 36:42.000]  Okay, is that better?
[36:42.000 --> 36:45.000]  That's much better.
[36:45.000 --> 36:55.000]  Okay, well, I understand, you know, I've already forgotten what I was going to ask you now, but I'll go ahead and don't cut to the chase there.
[36:55.000 --> 37:08.000]  Well, if we are going to be objecting to anything that's not pertinent to the case, that does mean that we, when filing a motion as you were talking about for the in-camera inspection,
[37:08.000 --> 37:21.000]  would that mean that we could still make an argument or at least read a statement to the court?
[37:21.000 --> 37:32.000]  Just because you asked for them to do an in-camera inspection of information you have, how does that interfere with your right to address the court on something else?
[37:32.000 --> 37:36.000]  Well, not on something else.
[37:36.000 --> 37:46.000]  Some other point regarding the issue, not something else separate, but a different point on issue.
[37:46.000 --> 37:48.000]  Okay.
[37:48.000 --> 37:50.000]  There's nothing to prevent that.
[37:50.000 --> 38:00.000]  The thing is, whatever you put into the written motion and give to the court, once the court rules on it, the court's not going to want you to bring it up again.
[38:00.000 --> 38:08.000]  But if it isn't in the written motion, then most certainly you can address it to the court if it's relevant.
[38:08.000 --> 38:09.000]  Okay.
[38:09.000 --> 38:10.000]  Thank you.
[38:10.000 --> 38:11.000]  You're welcome.
[38:11.000 --> 38:13.000]  Anything else?
[38:13.000 --> 38:26.000]  Well, my only question is that you don't necessarily advise going to run up his costs on the basis of we might end up with court costs.
[38:26.000 --> 38:33.000]  If you run up court costs unnecessarily unless you're absolutely positive, there's no way they can turn them back on you.
[38:33.000 --> 38:36.000]  And believe me, you're never that positive.
[38:36.000 --> 38:38.000]  Never that positive.
[38:38.000 --> 38:39.000]  All right.
[38:39.000 --> 38:48.000]  Partner, I appreciate it and we will be paying much more attention to your show and doing what we can to spread the word about you.
[38:48.000 --> 38:54.000]  Well, that would be greatly appreciated because I certainly try not to be talking out of my head or any other part of my anatomy.
[38:54.000 --> 39:06.000]  I try to use the law and clarify it for people's sake so that they know how to use it like the tool it's meant to be instead of getting themselves beat up with it like a crowbar in a back alley.
[39:06.000 --> 39:09.000]  We sure appreciate your time and we appreciate your efforts, brother.
[39:09.000 --> 39:10.000]  Strength and honor.
[39:10.000 --> 39:11.000]  Have a great evening.
[39:11.000 --> 39:12.000]  You too, sir.
[39:12.000 --> 39:13.000]  Thank you very much.
[39:13.000 --> 39:14.000]  All right.
[39:14.000 --> 39:16.000]  Now we're going to go to Chris in Texas.
[39:16.000 --> 39:19.000]  Chris, what you got for us?
[39:19.000 --> 39:21.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[39:21.000 --> 39:23.000]  I went to court today.
[39:23.000 --> 39:24.000]  Congratulations.
[39:24.000 --> 39:29.000]  And that was an experience.
[39:29.000 --> 39:31.000]  I had fun with it.
[39:31.000 --> 39:33.000]  What court for what purpose?
[39:33.000 --> 39:47.000]  I went to the municipal court in Fort Worth for the purpose of a plea to the jurisdiction.
[39:47.000 --> 39:58.000]  And the judge had failed to read anything that I had put before the court, which didn't surprise me.
[39:58.000 --> 40:13.000]  He, at the end of this plea to jurisdiction, he said, your motion is expressly overworld.
[40:13.000 --> 40:19.000]  Okay. How and why did you plead to jurisdiction?
[40:19.000 --> 40:29.000]  This is on the no driver's license ticket that I got sitting in a Tom Thumb parking lot.
[40:29.000 --> 40:30.000]  Okay.
[40:30.000 --> 40:35.000]  And again, that tells me what the ticket charge is.
[40:35.000 --> 40:42.000]  How does that actually answer my question of how did you challenge the jurisdiction of the court?
[40:42.000 --> 40:49.000]  That I was not engaged in transportation is what they're trying to pull me into.
[40:49.000 --> 40:50.000]  Okay.
[40:50.000 --> 40:56.000]  Again, how did you object to the jurisdiction of the court?
[40:56.000 --> 40:59.000]  I guess I'm not understanding the question.
[40:59.000 --> 41:03.000]  You mean as far as...
[41:03.000 --> 41:07.000]  What's in your challenge to the jurisdiction of the court?
[41:07.000 --> 41:08.000]  Oh, okay.
[41:08.000 --> 41:11.000]  What is your argument?
[41:11.000 --> 41:17.000]  My argument was that the court did not have jurisdiction because I was not involved in transportation.
[41:17.000 --> 41:27.000]  It also brings up, you know, site's case law supporting the fact that when a court is put on notice that it does not have jurisdiction.
[41:27.000 --> 41:29.000]  Oh, God.
[41:29.000 --> 41:33.000]  What site the case you're talking about?
[41:33.000 --> 41:34.000]  There's one here.
[41:34.000 --> 41:39.000]  It's Rankin v. Howard.
[41:39.000 --> 41:40.000]  Go ahead.
[41:40.000 --> 41:44.000]  Davis B. Burris.
[41:44.000 --> 41:49.000]  And by any chance, have you actually bothered to pull up those cases and read them?
[41:49.000 --> 41:52.000]  I did not get a chance to look up all of these, no.
[41:52.000 --> 41:53.000]  Okay.
[41:53.000 --> 41:58.000]  Let me put a little bug in the ear of everybody listening.
[41:58.000 --> 42:02.000]  Do not site case law.
[42:02.000 --> 42:09.000]  You have not thoroughly vetted yourself.
[42:09.000 --> 42:20.000]  You know, 80% of the crap you find in these patriot pleadings, the words that they're citing are not even in the opinion of the court that is being...
[42:20.000 --> 42:22.000]  of the case that's being cited.
[42:22.000 --> 42:31.000]  Not only is it not in there at all, but the context in which it's being used does not even address the point of the case.
[42:31.000 --> 42:40.000]  Never site case law you have not specifically pulled up and read.
[42:40.000 --> 42:42.000]  Got it?
[42:42.000 --> 42:43.000]  Yes, sir.
[42:43.000 --> 42:49.000]  Because I'm willing to bet you the judge may have actually done that very thing.
[42:49.000 --> 42:57.000]  And when he found out your case sites were BS, your entire motion became BS.
[42:57.000 --> 43:05.000]  The thing that led me to believe he had not read it is when I was reading from it, he said, where are you reading that from?
[43:05.000 --> 43:10.000]  And I said, it's here in my motion that I believe you have a copia.
[43:10.000 --> 43:15.000]  And he said, well, where's it at?
[43:15.000 --> 43:18.000]  And I had to actually tell him, it's on page three.
[43:18.000 --> 43:26.000]  And he went over there and he started looking at it and he says, okay.
[43:26.000 --> 43:28.000]  What other was he said?
[43:28.000 --> 43:34.000]  He said, okay, is there anything further you'd like to add?
[43:34.000 --> 43:36.000]  Yeah, just a little bit.
[43:36.000 --> 43:38.000]  Okay, hang on just a minute.
[43:38.000 --> 43:41.000]  We're going to take a break and then we'll come back and finish this up.
[43:41.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right, folks.
[43:42.000 --> 43:44.000]  Chris is my last and only caller.
[43:44.000 --> 43:47.000]  Don't leave him out here by himself or me either for that matter.
[43:47.000 --> 43:51.000]  512-646-1984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:52.000]  Give us a call.
[43:52.000 --> 43:53.000]  Give us a gripe.
[43:53.000 --> 43:54.000]  Give us a complaint.
[43:54.000 --> 43:55.000]  Give us a win.
[43:55.000 --> 43:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:25.000 --> 44:27.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:55.000 --> 44:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[45:25.000 --> 45:30.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley,
[45:30.000 --> 45:33.000]  who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful John Doe number two, exiting the rider truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing,
[45:44.000 --> 45:51.000]  no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:51.000 --> 45:57.000]  including when he rented the rider truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:26.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:27.000 --> 46:29.000]  All right folks, we are back.
[46:29.000 --> 46:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:32.000 --> 46:33.000]  Okay.
[46:33.000 --> 46:36.000]  Now, we are talking to Chris in Texas.
[46:36.000 --> 46:39.000]  All right, Chris, let's continue on here.
[46:39.000 --> 46:42.000]  Now, let me clarify one other thing about this case law situation,
[46:42.000 --> 46:45.000]  because I just got somebody else asking the same thing he asked.
[46:45.000 --> 46:49.000]  Does that include cases cited in Amjur, which is American jurisprudence?
[46:49.000 --> 46:51.000]  Absolutely.
[46:51.000 --> 46:52.000]  Here's why.
[46:52.000 --> 47:00.000]  American jurisprudence is looked at as a legal encyclopedia, not controlling opinion.
[47:00.000 --> 47:08.000]  Therefore, you read the cases that are cited in Amjur so that you can not only jeopardize the information out of that case,
[47:08.000 --> 47:14.000]  but look at all other referenced cases in relation to the same subject matter.
[47:14.000 --> 47:22.000]  Then maybe just maybe you will find that one of those other cases is controlling on that point of law.
[47:22.000 --> 47:30.000]  And that will be the case that you actually latch onto as citing the case in Amjur or whatever.
[47:30.000 --> 47:35.000]  But you always need to read, you need to jeopardize, and you need to make sure,
[47:35.000 --> 47:43.000]  and the whole purpose of jeopardization, of course, is to make sure that that case is still the controlling opinion.
[47:43.000 --> 47:47.000]  The controlling opinion is the only one that matters to the courts.
[47:47.000 --> 47:52.000]  Whether it's right, wrong, or idiotic, it doesn't matter.
[47:52.000 --> 47:55.000]  It's the one that wins.
[47:55.000 --> 47:58.000]  So you need to know two things.
[47:58.000 --> 48:02.000]  One, that your case law is the best case law.
[48:02.000 --> 48:13.000]  And two, whether or not the controlling case law was stupid in its decision and should be argued as being overturned by something else.
[48:13.000 --> 48:23.000]  And you can't do that if you have not read the case and understand the arguments of the court as to why it works that way.
[48:23.000 --> 48:25.000]  Are we clear?
[48:25.000 --> 48:26.000]  Yes.
[48:26.000 --> 48:27.000]  All right.
[48:27.000 --> 48:30.000]  So let's continue on.
[48:30.000 --> 48:39.000]  Okay, so was I wrong in thinking that the burden of proof fell on the prosecutor to prove that the court has jurisdiction?
[48:39.000 --> 48:41.000]  No.
[48:41.000 --> 48:43.000]  Because when we got started, the very first...
[48:43.000 --> 48:45.000]  Well, actually, yes, you are.
[48:45.000 --> 48:48.000]  The prosecutor does not have to prove the court has jurisdiction.
[48:48.000 --> 48:50.000]  The court has to prove it has jurisdiction.
[48:50.000 --> 48:56.000]  What the prosecutor has to prove is that he has standing to bring the charge.
[48:56.000 --> 49:05.000]  And the way that this started out is by the judge saying, we're here to hear this matter on blah, blah, blah.
[49:05.000 --> 49:06.000]  And he said...
[49:06.000 --> 49:14.000]  Okay, before we get that far, let me back up here a bit because there's something I need to know before we even get into that.
[49:14.000 --> 49:15.000]  Okay.
[49:15.000 --> 49:22.000]  Tell me exactly what happened from the moment you got pulled over by the officer.
[49:22.000 --> 49:34.000]  I was in a Tom Thumb parking lot going over to a space and he claimed that I threw a cigarette out the window.
[49:34.000 --> 49:37.000]  He came up, put his lights on behind me.
[49:37.000 --> 49:39.000]  I pulled into a space.
[49:39.000 --> 49:48.000]  He came up to my car and pulled me over for throwing a cigarette out the window and then asked me for a license.
[49:48.000 --> 49:51.000]  I refused to produce one.
[49:51.000 --> 49:57.000]  The reason I was refusing is because I do not have one on me.
[49:57.000 --> 50:04.000]  And he took my insurance card and I told him, I said, I'm not engaged in transportation.
[50:04.000 --> 50:09.000]  And I said, I have my insurance card.
[50:09.000 --> 50:15.000]  That's the only thing I have with me that has my name on it that also has an address with it.
[50:15.000 --> 50:16.000]  Can I ask you a question?
[50:16.000 --> 50:17.000]  Yes, sir.
[50:17.000 --> 50:18.000]  Okay.
[50:18.000 --> 50:30.000]  Did you do any of the preliminary questions that I instruct people to use to set the case tone of illegal stop, illegal rest?
[50:30.000 --> 50:31.000]  Okay.
[50:31.000 --> 50:36.000]  Then here's one that should have been automatic in this situation.
[50:36.000 --> 50:42.000]  Officer, would you please identify the alleged cigarette you saw me throw from the car window?
[50:42.000 --> 50:45.000]  Or that you allegedly saw me throw from the car window?
[50:45.000 --> 50:48.000]  Can you please identify the cigarette?
[50:48.000 --> 50:49.000]  I did not do that.
[50:49.000 --> 50:51.000]  I got that part.
[50:51.000 --> 50:54.000]  I'm just asking you what's wrong with that.
[50:54.000 --> 50:56.000]  There wouldn't have been anything wrong with that.
[50:56.000 --> 50:57.000]  Okay.
[50:57.000 --> 51:04.000]  Now, and if the officer could not identify and or procure the cigarette from wherever he allegedly saw it go.
[51:04.000 --> 51:05.000]  I mean, let's see.
[51:05.000 --> 51:09.000]  He's saying that that's his probable cause to initiate the stop.
[51:09.000 --> 51:12.000]  Was he charging you with littering to do this?
[51:12.000 --> 51:15.000]  Or was he charging you with five pounds?
[51:15.000 --> 51:16.000]  What?
[51:16.000 --> 51:18.000]  Littering less than five pounds.
[51:18.000 --> 51:19.000]  Okay.
[51:19.000 --> 51:22.000]  Where is that in the transportation code?
[51:22.000 --> 51:24.000]  That's a good question.
[51:24.000 --> 51:31.000]  No, that's an idiotic question because it's not in the transportation code.
[51:31.000 --> 51:34.000]  It's littering.
[51:34.000 --> 51:37.000]  Not in there.
[51:37.000 --> 51:51.000]  So how does that act constitute probable cause to ask you for license registration and proof of financial responsibility?
[51:51.000 --> 51:55.000]  There was no traffic offense that the officer could name.
[51:55.000 --> 52:03.000]  What was his probable cause to demand the things that are associated with a traffic offense?
[52:03.000 --> 52:06.000]  Yeah, he didn't have that probable cause.
[52:06.000 --> 52:07.000]  Ding ding.
[52:07.000 --> 52:10.000]  Somebody give this man a cold waffle.
[52:10.000 --> 52:12.000]  That's exactly the point.
[52:12.000 --> 52:13.000]  Okay.
[52:13.000 --> 52:17.000]  This is where we have to start learning to think on our feet.
[52:17.000 --> 52:19.000]  How do these things interrelate?
[52:19.000 --> 52:25.000]  If they don't interrelate, then what's the relevance of me producing a license when you're charging me with littering?
[52:25.000 --> 52:30.000]  Where in the hell do I get a license to litter?
[52:30.000 --> 52:31.000]  Exactly.
[52:31.000 --> 52:32.000]  That's a good question.
[52:32.000 --> 52:36.000]  That's a good way of putting it.
[52:36.000 --> 52:45.000]  Okay, so right there, the officer never established probable cause to ask for any of those things.
[52:45.000 --> 52:48.000]  Did the officer read you your rights?
[52:48.000 --> 52:49.000]  No.
[52:49.000 --> 52:57.000]  Then where's your motion to suppress the information produced and given to the officer?
[52:57.000 --> 53:01.000]  I'll have to go file it.
[53:01.000 --> 53:03.000]  Yeah.
[53:03.000 --> 53:05.000]  Okay.
[53:05.000 --> 53:08.000]  This is where it comes down to, folks.
[53:08.000 --> 53:10.000]  This is the whole reason for class.
[53:10.000 --> 53:14.000]  Now, I have not pledged to this thing at all.
[53:14.000 --> 53:15.000]  Okay.
[53:15.000 --> 53:18.000]  Have you been served with a complaint?
[53:18.000 --> 53:19.000]  No.
[53:19.000 --> 53:20.000]  Okay.
[53:20.000 --> 53:23.000]  Did you go into court and object to being served with a complaint?
[53:23.000 --> 53:24.000]  Yes.
[53:24.000 --> 53:30.000]  That's actually in my motion that I had over here for the challenge of subject matter jurisdiction.
[53:30.000 --> 53:33.000]  Did you file that motion as a special appearance?
[53:33.000 --> 53:34.000]  Yes.
[53:34.000 --> 53:36.000]  You're positive.
[53:36.000 --> 53:37.000]  Yes, sir.
[53:37.000 --> 53:41.000]  Did you file any other paperwork in association with this case?
[53:41.000 --> 53:42.000]  No.
[53:42.000 --> 53:43.000]  Okay.
[53:43.000 --> 53:45.000]  So you haven't filed the affidavit not in transportation.
[53:45.000 --> 53:47.000]  You haven't filed the special appearance.
[53:47.000 --> 53:50.000]  You haven't filed the motion waving assistance of counsel.
[53:50.000 --> 53:56.000]  You haven't filed the motion objecting to round robin processing by multiple judges.
[53:56.000 --> 53:59.000]  And things of that nature?
[53:59.000 --> 54:00.000]  No, sir.
[54:00.000 --> 54:01.000]  Okay.
[54:01.000 --> 54:07.000]  So you've just filed one motion and was, did it say special appearance?
[54:07.000 --> 54:08.000]  Yes, sir.
[54:08.000 --> 54:09.000]  Okay.
[54:09.000 --> 54:16.000]  So as long as you reserve special appearance, again, we're down to the argument of what's
[54:16.000 --> 54:20.000]  the argument on why the court does not have jurisdiction.
[54:20.000 --> 54:27.000]  Now, the argument of not in transportation goes toward standing by state, not directly
[54:27.000 --> 54:31.000]  to jurisdiction of the court except via standing.
[54:31.000 --> 54:36.000]  The state has not proved standing upon the record because state cannot prove there was
[54:36.000 --> 54:41.000]  a regular activity being engaged in at the time.
[54:41.000 --> 54:48.000]  But you also have not filed a special appearance and motion to suppress because the officer
[54:48.000 --> 54:56.000]  illegally stopped you and asked for information that had nothing to do with the alleged defense.
[54:56.000 --> 55:01.000]  And then again, the officer has no evidence of the alleged defense because the officer
[55:01.000 --> 55:04.000]  did not recover the cigarette, correct?
[55:04.000 --> 55:05.000]  Correct.
[55:05.000 --> 55:08.000]  So where's his evidence of littering?
[55:08.000 --> 55:09.000]  He has none.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  Exactly.
[55:10.000 --> 55:15.000]  Therefore, his evidence of probable cause to initiate the traffic stop doesn't exist,
[55:15.000 --> 55:16.000]  does it?
[55:16.000 --> 55:17.000]  No.
[55:17.000 --> 55:18.000]  Okay.
[55:18.000 --> 55:23.000]  So what is your argument now?
[55:23.000 --> 55:30.000]  It would be that they had no authority to even bring any of this against me.
[55:30.000 --> 55:32.000]  The arrest was illegal.
[55:32.000 --> 55:34.000]  The issuance of the citation was illegal.
[55:34.000 --> 55:39.000]  The search and seizure of the information relating to your license or driving record
[55:39.000 --> 55:46.000]  or anything else was illegal because the officer has no probable cause and cannot bring forth
[55:46.000 --> 55:51.000]  evidence of probable cause that any alleged defense was committed that would have allowed
[55:51.000 --> 55:55.000]  him to stop you on a transportation charge.
[55:55.000 --> 56:00.000]  I just went over that at the beginning of this with the DUI stuff.
[56:00.000 --> 56:03.000]  It operates the same no matter what.
[56:03.000 --> 56:07.000]  Where's his probable cause to initiate a transportation stop?
[56:07.000 --> 56:10.000]  Littering is not one of them.
[56:10.000 --> 56:19.000]  Littering is a separate offense all unto itself.
[56:19.000 --> 56:20.000]  Right?
[56:20.000 --> 56:22.000]  Yes, it is.
[56:22.000 --> 56:27.000]  I'm curious as to whether or not this makes a difference as to why they pulled me in on
[56:27.000 --> 56:29.000]  the no drivers license.
[56:29.000 --> 56:31.000]  Because he asked you for one.
[56:31.000 --> 56:33.000]  Did you give him one?
[56:33.000 --> 56:34.000]  No, I did not.
[56:34.000 --> 56:35.000]  Okay.
[56:35.000 --> 56:39.000]  So do you have one?
[56:39.000 --> 56:44.000]  I have one that's valid, but I don't have the actual physical license.
[56:44.000 --> 56:45.000]  Okay.
[56:45.000 --> 56:52.000]  So again, where's his evidence that you don't have one?
[56:52.000 --> 56:56.000]  Other than that fact that I didn't produce one, he...
[56:56.000 --> 56:59.000]  Listen to what you're hearing.
[56:59.000 --> 57:04.000]  I didn't ask you if you could produce one.
[57:04.000 --> 57:09.000]  I asked you what's his evidence that you don't have one.
[57:09.000 --> 57:12.000]  He doesn't have any because if he looked it up, it would be there.
[57:12.000 --> 57:13.000]  Exactly.
[57:13.000 --> 57:18.000]  So how the hell can you be charged with an offense when the record clearly shows the
[57:18.000 --> 57:23.000]  offense is a lie?
[57:23.000 --> 57:25.000]  Good point.
[57:25.000 --> 57:28.000]  Good point.
[57:28.000 --> 57:34.000]  So where's your DMV or your DPS record?
[57:34.000 --> 57:35.000]  What do you mean?
[57:35.000 --> 57:36.000]  I'm not understanding.
[57:36.000 --> 57:37.000]  Okay.
[57:37.000 --> 57:40.000]  Who issues drivers licenses?
[57:40.000 --> 57:42.000]  Department of Motor Vehicles.
[57:42.000 --> 57:44.000]  You're in Texas, aren't you?
[57:44.000 --> 57:47.000]  Yeah, Department of Transportation, I mean.
[57:47.000 --> 57:50.000]  No.
[57:50.000 --> 57:53.000]  Our DPS.
[57:53.000 --> 57:56.000]  There you go.
[57:56.000 --> 57:57.000]  Okay.
[57:57.000 --> 58:02.000]  So get your record from DPS showing that you do have a license.
[58:02.000 --> 58:07.000]  Now, if they kind of try to charge you, you can argue, hey, I want the charges thrown
[58:07.000 --> 58:12.000]  out, this officer is obviously a liar, he never ran my name or anything else to see
[58:12.000 --> 58:13.000]  if I had a license.
[58:13.000 --> 58:20.000]  He just presumed that because I wouldn't give him one, I didn't have one.
[58:20.000 --> 58:23.000]  There are different charges.
[58:23.000 --> 58:24.000]  See the point?
[58:24.000 --> 58:25.000]  Yes, sir.
[58:25.000 --> 58:26.000]  Okay.
[58:26.000 --> 58:27.000]  Anything else?
[58:27.000 --> 58:29.000]  Well, I was curious.
[58:29.000 --> 58:31.000]  I do have one other thing.
[58:31.000 --> 58:32.000]  Okay.
[58:32.000 --> 58:34.000]  Well, hang on and we'll cover that on the other side of the break.
[58:34.000 --> 58:37.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[58:37.000 --> 58:39.000]  This is our top of the hour break.
[58:39.000 --> 58:41.000]  I have only Chris on the line.
[58:41.000 --> 58:44.000]  I'm wondering where the rest of you people are sleeping tonight.
[58:44.000 --> 58:45.000]  Get on the air.
[58:45.000 --> 58:46.000]  Let's talk.
[58:46.000 --> 59:15.000]  All right, back.
[59:46.000 --> 59:47.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:48.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:52.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[59:52.000 --> 59:53.000]  LogosRidionetwork.com.
[59:53.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  This tropical fruit does wonders for your hard skin and hair, plus it kills harmful bacteria
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  and promotes oral hygiene.
[01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht in a moment, I'll let you know what that healthy something is.
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:25.000 --> 01:00:26.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:26.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:40.000]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Coconut oil has long gotten a bad rap.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  Although partially hydrogenated coconut oil is unhealthy, virgin coconut oil can do wonders
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  for your looks and your health.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  Let's start with the antioxidant effects.
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  Much like vitamin E, coconut oil helps exfoliate and repair damaged skin.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  It stimulates thyroid function and converts cholesterol into anti-aging steroids, lowering
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  risk of cancer and heart disease.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  Coconut oil also promotes weight loss.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  By boosting your metabolism, it makes you feel full longer.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  Finally, it's a natural antibiotic that can help prevent tooth decay.
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  So let's all go nuts for coconuts.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  Lawmakers like to boast about how popular they are on Twitter.
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  But a new study reveals a huge chunk of their followers are phony.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll pull back the curtain on our tweeting wizards in Congress right after this.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  Did you know Congress, at least on Twitter, is popular with ghosts?
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  A new study shows huge numbers of Twitter accounts following politicians are in fact fake.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  A digital marketing firm found that around 40% of everyone following House and Senate members were phonies.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  Congressman Jared Polis of Colorado was the biggest Twitter cheat.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  82% of his followers were bogus, followed by John McCain and Nancy Pelosi at 73%.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  No one topped Newt Gingrich, though.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  During his presidential run, 92% of Newt's followers were ghosts, and in the end, it showed.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  I'm Dr. Gappren Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rue de Blas Radio.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  Yeah, I knew I was going to be right.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  If I waited just long enough, the board would start to fill up.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  So we're halfway through the show, and now we've actually got several callers on the board.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  So let's get through this and see what we can do to finish this up.
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  All right, Chris, let's go through this one more time here and see if we can get this done.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Okay, my last question here is, when we first got started today, when he first opened up,
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  he immediately said that the burden of proof was on me to prove that the court did not have jurisdiction,
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  which went against everything that I've been reading that was to the contrary of that.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  He threw me off.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  Just the court, I mean, you said that the court has the burden of proof there.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  No, the prosecutor has the burden of proof.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  The court simply has to make the determination whether whatever information is being provided as to how they have jurisdiction,
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  whether or not they actually do.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  The prosecutor can say, according to this statute and this rule and this whatever, the court has jurisdiction on these grounds.
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  The court is always free to look at that information, go prosecutor or plaintiff.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  You are incorrect.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  That is not what the law means.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  That is not how it applies.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:05.000]  And in this particular instance, I do not have jurisdiction of this cause.
[01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  And therefore, I remand it back to whatever till you can file it in a proper court.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  The court always has that power.
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  The court can determine whether or not it actually has jurisdiction despite what the prosecutor is throwing out there.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  The prosecutor's job is to try to convince the court it's all in the right place,
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  or the plaintiff's job is to convince it's all in the right place,
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  but the court still has to agree it's in the right place,
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  or they can say, no, I don't have jurisdiction and get rid of it.
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  Okay, and because he wasn't hearing any, I mean, he didn't hear, if I mentioned anything.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  Now, wait a minute.
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  I never said the court would listen.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Okay, so don't go putting words in my mouth with this next argument.
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  I never said they would listen.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  Every one of these courts automatically presumes they have jurisdiction in these justice and municipal courts when it comes to traffic.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  Why? Because traffic is a misdemeanor case, fine, only class C, 99.9% of the time.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  And since the statute specifically says that they have original jurisdiction in such cases, then they presume it's automatic.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  They never look at whether or not standing has been invoked.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  Even though it is a due process procedural requirement, they never look for it.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  Why? Because they're all operating under the exact same faulty presumption of law that everyone is engaging in transportation.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  That's why they don't listen.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  That's why they don't read.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  That's why they don't understand.
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  Okay, well, so I haven't totally screwed myself by filing this thing, right? Because I filed it with special appearance and...
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  Or have I?
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  Well, that's the question.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  I haven't seen your paperwork.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  I don't know if you have or you haven't.
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  But as long as you kept it as a special appearance and you haven't waived jurisdiction by entering a plea, producing anything associated with transportation...
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  I mean, not only did you not give him a license, did you not give him anything else?
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  I gave him my insurance card.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  There you go. Ding, ding, ding.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  This is only...
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  Ding, ding, ding. Is insurance an accouterment of transportation?
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  I'm going to say I don't know.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  Why did you produce it?
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  I told him it was for ID purposes only.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Again...
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  Because he...
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  How is an insurance card going to ID you?
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  The insurance card could say Charlie Brown. How does that ID you?
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  The only thing I had with my name on it and he was threatening to take me to jail without any ID.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  Would that have been legal?
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  No, it wouldn't have been legal.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  Okay. You don't like money or what?
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  Oh, I do.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  Well, then why didn't you let this idiot keep screwing up enough to take some from him?
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  It arrested you for not having a state-issued ID. Please produce the law that says you're required to have a state-issued ID.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  Where is it?
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  To my understanding, there's not one.
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  Well, it's not just to your understanding. It's a bona fide fact. There isn't one.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  The only time you have to have a state ID is when you're using some state services that they require the ID to be obtained in order to access.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  Were you?
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  No.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  Great. Then tell the cop. I'm sorry. I'm not a subscriber to the service you offer, so I don't need any from you. Thank you. Please go on your way.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  Okay. Well, I just wanted to check and see with you because I went through this thing today and he kept insisting that the burden of proof was on me.
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  Absolutely not. The burden of proof is not on you to show the court has jurisdiction or that it doesn't. The burden on you is simply to challenge its jurisdiction.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  Once challenged, they have to prove it.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Okay. Should I bother appealing this thing?
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  Should you bother to duck when someone throws a brick at you?
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  Yes.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  Well, then that's a self-answering question, isn't it? But in order to make the appeal work, you've got to keep the case going the right way for the right argument.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  Which is he did not have authority to be even asked.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Illegal arrest, no probable cause, lack of notice, lack of jurisdiction, no transportation. Those are your key issues. Stick with those.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  Okay.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  I won't let you move on to the next caller.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  All right. Thank you very much.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:41.000]  Thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  You're welcome.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  All right. Is this the same Chuck from before? Let's find out. Chuck, is this you again?
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  Hey, I can hear me.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  I can hear you.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  Okay. Quick follow-up. I'm sitting here with a wife kicking things around. We can't find a form for in-camera inspection that applies to Texas.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  It's not a form. It's a motion. And it's simply the plaintiff or the fence moves the court to have an in-camera inspection review of the following whatever you're going to submit for the purpose of determining whether or not it proves falsification of the facts in the TRO.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  Okay. So the wording is just simply we request the court to review these.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  Well, the wording is anything relevant to that argument. Get the argument straight in your head and then write the words that make it.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  I don't have a problem with that.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  All right.
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  One other question.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  Okay.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  It's all through the patriot movement. Stand or no stand.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  Okay. Stand on your head. Stand on one foot. Stand on the judge's bias. What?
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  Do I stand whenever they say all rise?
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Well, that's up to you for religious reasons. I never do.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  Do you even know where that custom came from?
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  Well, I assume it's just a matter of dog training like everything else.
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Well, that's what it's become, but that's not how it originated. The reason people used to stand when a judge entered the courtroom was because the judge always entered the courtroom with the Bible held above his head.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  People stood to honor the word of God in the courtroom as being the only truth present and that the court's duty was to be as truthful in all proceedings.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  I guess I'm not going to be standing there.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  Okay.
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  They don't come in carrying a Bible anymore.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  Now they want you to stand up to honor the man or the woman in the black dress and I ain't having none of that soup.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  All right, brother.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  Now, if the bailiff or the judge or anybody else jumps on you, make sure you state, excuse me, no disrespect intended.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  However, my religious beliefs do not let me pay homage to a man or a woman and standing is all you're asking me to do is to pay homage to you in your capacity as a judge.
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  That violates my religious beliefs and I can't do that.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  I like that.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  Well, that's exactly what I've told them every time they've some bailiff's gotten in my face and it said, now, bailiff, let's see, Baker, do you intend to violate my freedom of religion rights by attempting to throw me out of a public courtroom or arrest me because I wouldn't stand
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  and pay homage to the guy in the black dress up front?
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:52.000]  You know, you said to your hordes are homage and homage.
[01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:56.000]  Well, it really just depends on what part of the country you're from.
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  The correct pronunciation, as I understand, is homage.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  But where I'm from, it can be home age.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  I don't care.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  Okay, just getting clarity there.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Appreciate your time again tonight, buddy.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  You're welcome.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  Have a good one.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  Thank you.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  All right, now we're going to go to John in Texas.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  John, what can we do for you?
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  Good evening.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  Eddie is a debater tonight.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  Actually, no.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  She may be in the background, but I'm running the board and doing the show.
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  Well, just wanted to get the word out, Eddie.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  I got a hold of Mike Mears' program to the link there.
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:52.000]  And I took my first of probably many creditors to federal court.
[01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  They decided they didn't want to have any of that.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  And they had already sued me in the lower JP court.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  I got that thrown out, got all future claims against me thrown out.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  They're going to get out of my credit report.
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  That's a good question.
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  Did you file to move the case to federal court from the local JP court before it completed?
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  No, I didn't.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  Okay.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  See, if you had done that and that JP continued to act, now you could have sued the JP too.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Wow.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  I'll keep that in mind, Eddie.
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  I was a little overwhelmed initially.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  I wasn't aware that you could, Mike Mears, I just wanted to save.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  I just wanted to really plug for him because anybody who's having credit issues,
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:53.000]  he definitely, his system really works.
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  I killed two birds with one stone, filed one suit, and they were trying to collect on one.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  The other one was just there, was not a very large dollar amount on the second one,
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  but they removed both claims on both with one lawsuit, and I got a check for $4,000.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  I never had to go before a federal judge, never even met with the attorneys.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  It was all just filed and served, and a few, a couple phone calls, a handful of emails,
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  and they sent me a check by DPS.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  Yeah, well, that's the way it's meant to work.
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  Anyway, that's the great program, and I wanted to appreciate you guys,
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  my time at about 3 a.m.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  All right, John.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Thank you.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  All right, folks.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  This is Rural Law Radio.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Call at number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:58.000]  We got about 45 minutes.
[01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation,
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  Tenghi Tangerine and Pollen Roast.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by August's Barms,
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  Vergie Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silverpool,
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Call us at 512-646-440 for more details.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A,
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  about a half-mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  Visit the CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-440.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  Ain't I a sight compared to what I used to be?
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  Calcium, magnesium, selenium, and zinc.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  Take a moment now and think.
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  If you have a little thing,
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  every day will bring the life that you've been looking for.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Beyond Tenghi Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 KW.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach,
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  founder of Young Jevity, and creator of Beyond Tenghi Tangerine.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:07.000]  Ain't gonna blind me
[01:19:07.000 --> 01:19:14.000]  Don't bore me
[01:19:17.000 --> 01:19:21.000]  Well
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old chicken
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  This is Cool Law Radio.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  You've got several callers up on the board right now, including Crystal from Nevada.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  Alright Crystal, what can we do for you?
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Well, first of all, I want to say I'm astounded that the people there in Austin don't show up to class.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  Because I'm stuck out here in Vegas and I can't go and I've been envious all this year.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  I've been listening and then I come to hear that, you know, they're not going there in droves
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  and I just want to chastise them a little bit for not going to class.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  Yeah, well that's awful sweet of you. Thank you very much.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  But let me make it where you'll be a little bit happier.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  This new website I'm working on, Tau of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  We're actually going to be conducting online classes from that site.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  It will have distance learning software so you can actually view the classes audio, visual, and video simultaneously
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  and participate in the class from anywhere on the planet with an internet connection.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  That'd be great.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  So when this is all said and done and this site launches, everyone that wants to participate in class can.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  Good.
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  Yeah, no longer being jealous of these people there.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  Yeah, well no longer be low on participation. I'm hoping we'll be this.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  And the other feature set of this is going to be making it where we can unify the Patriot community
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  and get us working together instead of separately.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  Yeah, there you go.
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  Well, one thing I was wondering about and I haven't belonged for two years is that
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:13.000]  anybody has come up with a procedure or some kind of way to protect themselves when they have to go through these TSA thugs
[01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  that there's anything that you can do verbally or affidavit or maybe get them to sign something or if it's just a lost cause.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  I would recommend wearing a real tight rubber pants underneath your clothes and coat the outside of it with super glue
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  when they reach down and grab something they're stuck.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Just what you want is a TSA agent stuck to you.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  Hey, that would be your evidence in court that you were being sexually molested by this individual
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  because they couldn't yank their hand away so I've never touched them.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  That's true.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  I mean, imagine that airport surveillance video in court.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  Well, that'd be funny.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  Well, I also thought about maybe having led them, warning them that I might have TSA triggered Tourette syndrome, you know,
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  and just go and just start swinging it, you know, when I get stressed.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  I tell them I have bludgeonies and when they ask what that is, I said,
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  I react violently to people I don't know grabbing parts of me I think they shouldn't be touching.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  You know, that should work.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  Well, I don't know.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  I haven't scheduled a holiday trip and I guess I'll be driving because I just...
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  You'll be whatting?
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  Probably be traveling.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  There you go.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  I knew as someone saying they had been listening, you should know better than that.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  Thought I'd check.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  No, I do know better.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  All right.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  Well, that was it.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  I just wanted to give the Austinites or whatever you call yourself a little hard time for not going to class.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Lazyites is what I'm calling them.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Yeah, well.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  Okay, that's it.
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  All right, Crystal, appreciate you calling in.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  Thank you very much, ma'am.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  Sure. All right.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  All right, now we're going to Doug in Texas.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  This ought to be good.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  What do you got for us, Mr. Doug?
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  Well, Eddie, I've got a... Last time I was in court, I went forward with Dr. Bill Vieth.
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  He was on some kind of a tax case.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  I had Randy Weaver on one side and I had Ralph Winterode on the other side.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  And the bailiff came in there and said, all rise for the honorable whoever it was.
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  I don't even remember, some female judge.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  And I just sat there and they were both kicking me.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  Like, get up, get up, get up, get up, get up, get up, get up, get up.
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  And they said, well, why didn't you rise?
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  And they didn't do anything to me, but they said, why didn't you rise?
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  And I said, because they didn't say salmon to us.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  So I think I won that one.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Yeah, well, I can say I'm not about to pay homage to a man or a woman.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  They're not getting any worship service out of me in that courtroom.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  Right.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  So, yeah, I mean, I completely agree with that.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  If they want to argue about it, I'm going to say, excuse me, you're going to throw me out of a public courtroom
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  or hold me in contempt for exercising my religious freedoms.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  I don't think so.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  You're only going to get away with that one this half of one time until I can get the lawsuit filed.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  You want to try that?
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:44.000]  And what I probably would have said if you were in front of me, you said honorable, you know.
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  Who did?
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  You know, I probably, if they had confronted me about not getting up, I just kept my scene.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  But if they had confronted me about it, I'd say, you know, I realize that kind of this little person's going up there,
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  but is there an honorable version of them that I haven't seen or whatever?
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  You know, the honorable completely throws me off.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Yeah, well, again, I have yet to find one that is honorable.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  That's why I will not address them as your honor.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  They are judge.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  And when they're not around, they're something else, but still.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  I understand that.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  I understand that.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  And let me tell you this, man, I was sitting at the South Congress AKB drinking my essential water, which is high dollar.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  Well, I know what the essential water is, but yours had a foamy head on top, didn't it?
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  No, I didn't.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  I started about eight o'clock at night, man.
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  Before that, it did.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  But I had APD pull up there.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  Come up there in the window and say, so are you drinking?
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  I said, well, I certainly am.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  And I said, well, we got a lady call in.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  911 called it.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  You were down here drinking.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  And I said, well, yeah, I am drinking.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  And I said, well, it's super hydrating, high pH water and this and that and that.
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  Well, we certainly took up your time.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  And I said, I'm sorry, I don't have anything better to be than responding to 911 calls or 311 or whatever it was.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  Because guys, you know, not sitting here eating a hard boiled egg and talking on the cell phone and whatever.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  What would be appropriate response should have been, man.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  What should I say to him?
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Well, that sounds fine to me.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Well, that gum right I'm drinking.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  Why do you ask?
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  Why?
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  Well,
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  my general thing is, you know, I'm not going to admit, even if I know for a fact that I'm drinking something that they can't possibly charge me with,
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  my first question is going to be, what business is it of yours if I'm drinking?
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  Who are you and what do you want?
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  I mean, what difference does it make if I'm drinking?
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  Well, I'd probably still be down there being taste if I said that.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Well, again, Doug, what does people have against money?
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  Well, you know, times have changed.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  Because I remember back when I was a kid and I could, you know, a university.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  He used to be the one that I could tell cops.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  Like, you know, you work for me and this and that and that, and we didn't think about doing that bad because, you know, they drive critical people,
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  double amputees out of their wheelchairs, shooting them in front.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  Well, let me clarify something real quick for folks out there that are listening, especially the ones in Austin.
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  Folks, you want to see things change in the city of Austin.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  You need to elect Raymond Frank Sheriff.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  The main reason you need to elect him Sheriff is he's asked me to be Chief Deputy if he gets elected.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  If I'm Chief Deputy, there's not going to be very many revenue officers left in the municipality because they're all going to be occupying my jail cells.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Okay.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  So if you really want to clean up Austin, let's start with the real criminals in blue.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  Elect Raymond Frank Sheriff so that I can become Chief Deputy and we can actually make a difference around here.
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  That would be worth having, I would think.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Little shame of self promotion for the job, but at least I'm willing to do it right.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Good blood, Eddie, and we can hope that people won't just go out there and vote for the deed because I hadn't seen any Craig Hamilton a year or so ago that I saw signs right now.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Yeah.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  All right, Doug, you got anything else we're about to hit the break?
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  All right.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  Hang in there.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  We'll talk to you later on.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  All right, Doug, take it on.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  We'll get you on the other side.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back after the break.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  A Noble Live, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did, you've dug on well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Expose the cover up now at anoblelive.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  The Rule of Law radio network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Eddie is a former Nacodotius Sheriff's deputy and for the past 21 years he's been studying the due process of law
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books,
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  Admission is $20 so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  At hempusa.org we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:29.000]  Micro-plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  Alright, looks like we have Paula and looks like Maine. Paula, what can we do for you?
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Hi.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Well, I thought I'd give you all an update on the situation with the husband that was charged with falling in possession of firearms and a few other little things.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:55.000]  Okay.
[01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:05.000]  Well, he didn't want to go to trial, so he put guilty on some of the counts and spent seven days in jail while he was reduced.
[01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  You know, he got out early five days. He's going to have to pay a fine.
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:18.000]  He's going to have to make monthly payments, but they still have all of our family's guns, most of them which are my son's guns.
[01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  Now, before he put guilty, the judge recused himself. Now, that judge was handling my appeal on a denial of unemployment benefits,
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  and I had asked that judge to recuse himself for my case because he was on my husband's, is the judge presenting over my husband's case,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  and he had refused to do that, but now he apparently recused himself.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  Well, they're going to look at it as being much different in a civil versus a criminal case.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  Great. Okay, so that's what I thought it might be.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  So, I sent paperwork asking to be a party to the case just before my husband fled, guilty, or took a plea bargain, you know,
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  and I asked to be a party to the case, and I challenged jurisdiction first, of course. I said that there should be a frank hearing.
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  Now, they didn't send me a stamped copy of my plea, my motion. I called the courthouse and asked what had happened with my motion.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  The clerk said that the judge had told her to send copies to the lawyers for the parties, but they never sent me a stamped copy.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  However... Well, wait a minute. How are you a lawyer for the party?
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  I'm not. I put in a motion on my own. I said that I have a right to some of this property because I'm married to, you know, the person you took them from.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  They took them from us, out of our home, so I said that I had an interest in those guns.
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  Yeah, which means you're going to have to sue to get them back.
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  Is that what I'll have to do now? That is what you're going to have to do.
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  And I would be, like, a federal lawsuit?
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  Absolutely. Theft of a firearm at the federal level is a felony.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  So then I would file, like, a statement of claim to the federal court.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  And how about the violation of privacy? I'll come in with that. Theft of firearms.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  And those also... Well, you see, I'm...
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  Okay, it is all a deprivation of right suit. They took your property without just compensation and without a warrant and without a court order.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  They did have a warrant.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  Not for your property, they didn't.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:50.000]  Oh, okay. All right. Well, now my husband, me and him purchased these guns. I don't remember.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  I don't know if I was on any of the purchases. This was dating back 30 years. He's had many guns through the whole time, bought and sold.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  Now, in order for my son to get their guns back, the lawyer wants him to get affidavits from my son telling which guns are theirs.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  But ultimately, he tells me that the lawyer called the other day and said they won't release my son's gun or at least those that they just...certain ones, unless my husband forfeits again his gun.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  Now, he sort of forfeited them, but he had no choice and it was more or less...
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  Okay, then that needs to be done in. Make them put that in writing and then use that in your suit against them to get the guns back.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  You're going to have to sue. Everybody's going to have to sue.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  Now, I told him that. I said that she can't do that for you because it's like accepting...
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  No, they cannot use their theft as justification against one piece of property they have no right to to coerce someone else to waive a right in order to give up that property.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  Well, I will ask him to tell his lawyer to put that in writing because as soon as he said that, I said, tell her to put it in writing because I knew this was not right.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  So, now, the motion that I put in, I did get a stamped copy of that motion because my husband got a copy from his lawyer.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  So, I made a copy for me and I would like to know which...when I do my statement of claim, I just do a statement of claim in the courthouse.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  I don't need to have any evidence or at this point, actually, the case is still in Maine Superior Court in Iristak County because they're waiting...
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  The judge is waiting before he makes a decision on my motion apparently is waiting until he gets a list from the DA, you know, what's going to happen to the guns.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  And then force the DA to make that list a lot faster by filing suit against him for illegal search and seizure of private property.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  Okay. That would still be in federal court though. That's a different court than what we're in.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Correct.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  Could I just ask to move the case to the...
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  No.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  Okay.
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  It's a separate case.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  No private property, even though it's in relation to the state case, the property was illegally seized without a warrant because the property will...
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  The warrant only applied to guns owned by your husband.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  Okay. Or in the sole possession of your husband.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  They can't just take every gun in the house under the pretense that it's his.
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  Okay.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  Okay.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  Okay. All right.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  So we let them know from the very beginning in fact that those guns belong to our son.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  Okay. That's fine. Just make sure you document all that and get your suit filed.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Okay.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  Well, thanks.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:06.000]  You're welcome.
[01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  You posted on my progress.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  All right.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  Bye.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Dirk in Texas.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  Dirk, what can we do for you?
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  Well, Mr. Eddie Craig, I have not listened to you before. I've heard advertisements on, you know, text from Liberty Radio because I try to listen to it every chance I get in Austin.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  All right.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  And God, I'd love to be able to come see your class on Sundays, but as per se, I'm a driver and that just ain't always happening.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  So I was kind of rather glad that you spoke with us tower of law that could be done online.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  Yeah. And actually, if it works out the way we want it to, it'll actually be able, you'll be able to access the class at least via a live streaming podcast if nothing else.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  We're going to try to set it up where you can access it from almost any mobile device as well as we get those features done.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  All right. Great. Great. Great. Great. That'll be great. All right. Let me start out here.
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  I am a CDL driver and I was off duty in my last vehicle and I got tagged for a failure to yield right away and making a left turn on a protected arrow.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  Basically, what it mounted to was that's dragging the line.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  Okay, there was a truck and about six cars. Of course, the truck takes time to get going and stuff, so which beats up the time of the light.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  Right.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  As I went through the light, I noticed the oncoming traffic start and then bank check and I caught that from a peripheral and I looked up the light and I still had a green light.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  I didn't have a green arrow, but I had a green light.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:51.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:51.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  I'm like, okay, well, shit. I went ahead and proceeded to start to make the ramp up onto I-10 East off of Texas 46 coming from the Bronfels.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:08.000]  Next thing I know, there come the disco show.
[01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  Paul was a bird dog in that corner and he asked me, you know why I stopped? I said, well, I ain't really got a good idea. He said, well, you went through that light.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Actually, about three ahead of you. You all went through the light together and the light had already turned.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Now, people at the other end, they had the brake check and I said, well, yeah, I caught that, but I mean, you know, anyways, I told him I said I ain't had a ticket and shoot four or five years, but I said, you know, I sure am sorry.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  I apologize. I mean, you know, granted, I might not have been paying that close attention to the arrow itself, but I'm just dragging the line trying to clear the intersection, you know.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  Anyway, he come back and says, well, you know, you can probably get this road off with a driver's course or whatever, you know, of course, it clearly states on the back of the ticket CDL drivers, no driver's course.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  And when I went to the pre-trial hearing, the prosecuting attorney was making his hour-long steal about, you know, what this matter does, and then he come up with the fact that, well, you CDL drivers, you basically shut up.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  Excuse me, I don't know so well because, you know, the Federal Highway Commission is basically blackmailed the Texas legislature into clamping down on you guys or else they lose their Federal Highway money.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  Well, when I went to talk to him about, you know, what you do, you know, what you do at pre-trial, see if there's anything to go on with or not.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  I asked him because I had been prompted. I used to be a member of American Driver's Association out of Kilvore, Texas.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  And, you know, I got a little bit of ammunition from them. Well, anyway, I proceeded to ask him if there was any way he could drop that down to a city ordinance or non-moving, and he looked to me and said, not a chance.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  And I said, well, I guess I'll see you in court for jury trial then.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  What I need to know is I need some ammunition.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  Well, let me stop you right there. You've already got plenty of ammunition. The problem is, is you gave it to the cop to use against you.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  Hang on just a minute and we'll explain that a little bit better on the other side.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. We are coming up on our last segment with Dirk and Chris, so I'm not going to get the number out again.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Hang in there, fellas. We'll get back on the other side. This is Rule of Law Radio. Your host, Eddie Craig, will be right back after this break.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock inner food, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays, so get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, death by step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:29.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  You will receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:15.000]  We're called toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:23.000]  Alright folks, we are back. We are now in the last segment of our two-hour Monday night traffic show.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  Okay, now let's get this wrapped up. We'll get back to dirt.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Okay, dirt, let me kind of rain on your parade a little bit here.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  Okay.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Alright, first off, yes, you are a CDL driver.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Therefore, the worst thing in the world you can do is start admitting that you're a CDL driver and that the CDL driver did something that the cop can validly complain about.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  And when you start apologizing and you start conversing and you start answering, that is exactly what you're doing.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  Everything that you said will be seen and heard in court if the prosecutor deems it necessary to pull that video out.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  That video will not help you because you are heard admitting that you did something wrong because you're apologizing for doing something wrong.
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  Get the point.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  Okay.
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  What we do not do is ever acknowledge that we did something wrong normally because as non-CDL holders and non-commercial drivers, we don't.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:47.000]  But even if you are, there is this little thing called innocent until proven guilty and we don't want to help them with that.
[01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:49.000]  Well, right, understandable.
[01:47:49.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  So, in the area you said that you haven't listened to the show before, I'd highly recommend you go back and start digging up some archives, especially when you find the one on what not to say to the police.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Okay.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  There are very basic things we say and then there are three very basic things we do when those things are said.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:20.000]  Now, I'm going to give you the last three things you do first so that we emphasize everything that precedes it.
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:25.000]  The last three things you do, shut up.
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  Keep shutting up.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  Shut up some more.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  Okay.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Kind of like kiss, right?
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Very much like kiss.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  Okay.
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  Keep it silent, stupid.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  Okay.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  All right.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  Now, let's go with what you say before you get to those three things.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  What is the emergency and how can I help?
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  We ask this so that we don't show anything that makes us look guilty by assuming we did something wrong.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  The officer initiated this stop.
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  This officer thinks there's an issue.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  Let him tell us what he thinks it is.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Don't volunteer to help him.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  What is the emergency and how can I help?
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Okay.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  Second, is there a record being made of this stop?
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Got it?
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  Third thing, if you're not a commercial driver or if you're not on the clock as a commercial driver,
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  for the record, officer so-and-so, I inform you that I am not actively engaging in transportation or commercial use of the highways.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  Do you acknowledge that you have been so informed?
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  Last thing, or next to last thing here, am I under arrest?
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  Am I free to go?
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  Those are two separate questions.
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  You cannot get the same answer to both.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  If it's no and no, then the next thing you say is, since I am not free to leave of my own volition, then I must presume that I am in a custodial arrest,
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  in which case I invoke my right to remain silent and my right to assistance of counsel.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  Officer so-and-so, do you intend to punish me for invoking my protected rights by placing me in physical restraints and locking me away in a jail cell
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  and use the officer's name as much as possible throughout this set of questions?
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  Okay.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  That puts them on the spot to being associated with violations of rights that they know is going to come back and bite them in the butt later if you press the issue.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  Give them every reason to believe you are going to press the issue.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:30.000]  But once you get those out of your mouth, those last three actions kick in.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  Got it?
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  Okay.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  If you must speak, then you speak only in a manner that serves to protect your rights.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  Not to waive any, not to confess anything, not to provide testimony or evidence that can be used against you.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  Everything you say or do is geared specifically to protecting you and your rights.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  Okay.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  Stop conversing, stop treating the cop like he's your friend or he's a nice guy.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  He isn't.
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  Not when he's conducting an investigation to charge you with a crime or an alleged crime.
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  Okay.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  Now as far as what you can do, at this point I don't know not having everything that you've done.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:28.000]  Have you appeared in court on this yet?
[01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  Only pre-trial.
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  Well, only pre-trial is enough.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  So did you enter a plea?
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  I sent in a motion plea not guilty.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  Okay.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  Then here's my recommendation.
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  Take out your wallet, count out whatever money they said you owe and pay it.
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:57.000]  Because you are screwed, blued and tattooed and no way out.
[01:52:57.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  I'm going to ask you a question.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  Ask me too if it'll make you feel better.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Okay.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  Years ago I started pulling law books out of the college libraries and started reading.
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  What I found out was that under rules of arrest that when they throw the lights on you,
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  that is considered arrest without warrant.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  They have 15 minutes whether to charge you or release you.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  I'm also on that arrest without warrant because it is an arrest without warrant.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  A warrant must be signed off by the magistrate only.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  That if it is signed off by the captain of the barracks or barracks commander, et cetera,
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  that is not sufficient to honor a warrant without rest.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  Well, absolutely not.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  Only a magistrate can sign a warrant of arrest.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  In any state because it's a judicial capacity that has to sign it.
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Anybody at the barracks is not judicial, they're executive.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  Okay.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  So my first point that I was going to go for was the motion to dismiss.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  Of course, I requested in my request for production to find out who signed off on the ticket.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  Who's signature is signing off on the ticket to find out whether it's the officer's captain
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  or barracks commander, et cetera.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  Okay.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  What difference does it make who signed off on the ticket?
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  Well, if it wasn't the magistrate, then the ticket is not valid as an arrest without warrant.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  Well, what makes you think a ticket is serving as a warrant?
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  That's the reason it's called a warrantless arrest.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  Okay.
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  The ticket is simply evidence of the accusation and the signature on it is your promise to appear in response to that accusation if the officer lets you go rather than taking you before a magistrate, which is what he's supposed to do.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  He's not supposed to take you to a jail cell.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  The law in Texas requires he takes you immediately before a magistrate, which they very rarely do.
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  Understandable.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  Yeah, I know.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  But that must have been a few tickets and gone to jail before.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  Okay.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  So the approach you're taking will not work, trust me.
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:45.000]  Okay.
[01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  There is 21 years of study behind what I'm telling you.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  Not going to work.
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  I'm listening to you.
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  I like your attitude and I like what you're saying.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  You know, I really do.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  My next process was simply appeal to the jury.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  Not going to help you.
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  The jury is already educated to think you're dead wrong.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  Not going to help you.
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  Well, what I was going to say was, okay, I mean, yeah, you got the video, yeah, I went through the light, but I was not intending there's no criminal intent.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  Not required to be criminal intent and transportation offense written right into the statute that way.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Men's Ria is not a necessary element.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  Okay.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  So I'm just SOL.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  I got to eat it.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  I'm going to wind up with two points off my license and go on my MBR.
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  That's pretty much the way it's going to work.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  That's the problem with not knowing how to defend this stuff from the very beginning.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  If you don't do everything the right way, then you wind up stepping off into traps you can't get out of later.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  It's kind of like the brayer rabbit scenario of touching the tar baby.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Even if you manage to get loose from the tar baby, evidence you touched him is still sticking all over you.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  Okay.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  So the best thing to do, never touch the tar baby at all.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  And in order to do that, you have to learn how to recognize what is tar baby and what isn't.
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:47.000]  Now I guarantee you, I would love to have the money and the time to sit and take these law classes and law courses because I get so faculty partied and angry.
[01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  That's back to what all these cops do out there.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  It's just a revenue scam.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Well, that's exactly what it is.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  It's a revenue scheme, but that's exactly why you have to learn the proper way to fight it.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  All right, Dirk, I'm sorry I might cut you off here so we can get this off there, but I appreciate you calling in and don't fail to do it again because we can't continue this education to your benefit and everybody else's, okay?
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  Okay.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  All right.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  I'd have to talk to you in more detail, but right now I'm going to pretty much assure you absolutely know.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Okay.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  All right, thanks for calling in, Dirk.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  All right, Chris, last second.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  A plea bargain is not a bribe.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  No, that defense will not work.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  Try something else.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  All right, folks, this has been Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  Thank you so much for the calls.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  Thank you so much for listening.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  Please be with us on Thursdays and Fridays.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  And again, this coming Monday.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  Good night.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  God bless.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  Take care.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  God bless.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:37.000]  God bless.
[01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:59.000]  God bless.