[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  Brighton has nearly two million surveillance cameras in public places, but a new camera
[00:08.000 --> 00:12.000]  that barks out orders has Privacy Activist shouting Big Brother.
[00:12.000 --> 00:17.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with details on the new breed of talking cameras next.
[00:17.000 --> 00:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:19.000 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:35.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[00:35.000 --> 00:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:46.000 --> 00:50.000]  Stop. This is a restricted area and your photograph is being taken.
[00:50.000 --> 00:55.000]  It will be sent for processing if you do not leave the area now.
[00:55.000 --> 01:01.000]  That message came from a close circuit TV camera, intimidating pedestrians at London's Walker House.
[01:01.000 --> 01:07.000]  It's a government surveillance camera that not only watches law-abiding citizens, but apparently threatens them too.
[01:07.000 --> 01:13.000]  Officials claimed the Orwellian cameras would put the k-bosh on street crime, but the public saw it differently.
[01:13.000 --> 01:19.000]  And after a few heated protests, Big Brothers switched off the camera's robo-cop-like audio warnings.
[01:19.000 --> 01:23.000]  So now the all-seeing eye is back to watching silently.
[01:23.000 --> 01:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:35.000 --> 01:42.000]  A North Dakota court has upheld the first ever use of a robotic drone in the arrest of an American citizen.
[01:42.000 --> 01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with the details on this chilling police state decision. Next.
[01:47.000 --> 01:53.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58.000 --> 02:03.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:03.000 --> 02:06.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging onto.
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:17.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:17.000 --> 02:26.000]  Ronnie Brossert, a rancher in North Dakota, was arrested after a standoff with police for refusing to return four cows that had wandered onto his land.
[02:26.000 --> 02:34.000]  It's not the fact that he was arrested, but how? He's the first American to be arrested on U.S. soil through the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle.
[02:34.000 --> 02:40.000]  His lawyer argued that because police had used a drone to track him without a warrant, the case should be dismissed.
[02:40.000 --> 02:44.000]  The judge disagreed saying the drone had no bearing on the charges.
[02:44.000 --> 02:52.000]  Say what? Using surveillance drones to track and arrest Americans without a warrant is a clear abuse of our constitutional freedoms.
[02:52.000 --> 03:02.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:02.000 --> 03:17.000]  Music
[03:17.000 --> 03:20.000]  Really, man, come on.
[03:20.000 --> 03:24.000]  Six o'clock news says somebody been shot.
[03:24.000 --> 03:35.000]  Somebody's been viewed. Somebody blew up a building. Somebody stole a car. Somebody got away. Somebody didn't get too far.
[03:35.000 --> 03:40.000]  They didn't get too far.
[03:40.000 --> 03:55.000]  Right.
[03:55.000 --> 04:04.000]  Right, folks. Good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. It is traffic tonight, but we do have a special guest.
[04:04.000 --> 04:08.000]  Deborah, would you care to come on and tell us who we're talking with tonight?
[04:08.000 --> 04:13.000]  Yes. Thank you, Eddie, for letting me preempt the traffic night.
[04:13.000 --> 04:22.000]  We are going to have a very special guest for the first half hour of the show, and then we'll turn the show back over to Eddie to answer all your traffic questions.
[04:22.000 --> 04:30.000]  We have, of course, the one and only one of my personal heroes, Mr. Richard Gage, AIA.
[04:30.000 --> 04:39.000]  He is the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-Eleven Truth. I'm going to read a little bit of his bio here for folks who don't know about him.
[04:39.000 --> 04:46.000]  And actually, I haven't read much of this on the air yet, so I just wanted to inform my listeners here.
[04:46.000 --> 04:55.000]  Richard Gage, AIA is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and member of the American Institute of Architects.
[04:55.000 --> 05:00.000]  He is the founding member of Architects and Engineers for 9-Eleven Truth.
[05:00.000 --> 05:10.000]  He has been an architect for over 24 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings.
[05:10.000 --> 05:23.000]  Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400 million mixed-use urban project with, altogether, about 1,200 tons of steel framing.
[05:23.000 --> 05:34.000]  Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the World Trade Center high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9-Eleven researcher, David Ray Griffin,
[05:34.000 --> 05:42.000]  on the radio in 2006, which launched Mr. Gage's own unyielding quest for the truth about 9-Eleven.
[05:42.000 --> 05:57.000]  Architects and Engineers for 9-Eleven Truth now has more than 1,700 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9-Eleven.
[05:57.000 --> 06:00.000]  Mr. Richard Gage, thank you and welcome to the show.
[06:00.000 --> 06:05.000]  Thanks, Deborah. It's just great to be here with you again, and I'm in Texas.
[06:05.000 --> 06:08.000]  You are back in Texas. This is so exciting.
[06:08.000 --> 06:15.000]  Yes, you were here about a month and a half ago, almost two months ago, at Brave New Books, and we had a fabulous time.
[06:15.000 --> 06:30.000]  That archive is posted. We put on the air the entire intro and a wonderful, fabulous interview, actually, during the screening and then the Q&A session after the screening.
[06:30.000 --> 06:42.000]  It was just a great time, and now you are coming back to Texas. You're going to be in Houston tomorrow night. You're going to be in San Antonio Wednesday night and Dallas on Thursday night.
[06:42.000 --> 06:54.000]  So we wanted to have you on tonight to tell us a little bit about this leg of your tour. You are back by popular demand, so give us the rundown. Where are you going to be?
[06:54.000 --> 07:13.000]  You betcha. In Houston tomorrow night at 6.30 at the Bayland Community Center, 6400 Bisonette Street, and we'll be airing the premiere, showing the premiere of 9-Eleven Explosive Evidence Experts Speak Out,
[07:13.000 --> 07:27.000]  which we have now all together, as you mentioned, 1,700 architects and engineers, but 43 of these are the top of the top, and we have them in our film.
[07:27.000 --> 07:33.000]  They're talking about the evidence for the explosive demolition of these towers.
[07:33.000 --> 07:45.000]  We're talking high-rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, physicists, chemists, fire protection engineers, explosive demolition experts.
[07:45.000 --> 07:56.000]  These are the people who know what's going on and have the credibility to deliver the evidence in a way that people walk away from this film.
[07:56.000 --> 08:16.000]  I'm telling you, by a show of hands, we did 32 cities of this tour, including Austin, and by a show of hands, 90% to 100% of those who came in agreeing with the official story or who were unsure end up agreeing with us.
[08:16.000 --> 08:37.000]  This is really a quite amazing turnaround, and then, of course, the implications of what these 43 experts are talking about is extraordinary, because let's face it, Al-Qaeda probably didn't have access to these buildings to set these explosives.
[08:37.000 --> 08:42.000]  These are three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon.
[08:42.000 --> 08:57.000]  We have eight psychologists in the film who talk about what happens inside of us when we're first confronted with this information, which really produces a cognitive dissonance.
[08:57.000 --> 09:13.000]  We don't want to accept what we're hearing, because we automatically, rationally, obviously, conclude that this is some sort of an inside job, if what they're saying is true.
[09:13.000 --> 09:32.000]  It's very difficult to deal with that, so we tend to go into denial or have fear or anger or tremendous sadness coming up, some of which keeps people from being willing to do anything about this situation.
[09:32.000 --> 09:57.000]  We find ourselves in as Americans, where we were led into two major wars, led by the nose through deception, and our legislators were manipulated into legislating away precious civil liberties, such as Asicama Tatas, where in the Declaration of Independence,
[09:57.000 --> 10:11.000]  we have Article 1, which gives us the right to not be arrested without a right to a trial, without the right to an attorney, and not be held indefinitely.
[10:11.000 --> 10:20.000]  But all of that is now out the window, if they can simply say that we're associated with terrorism, and they don't even define terrorism.
[10:20.000 --> 10:42.000]  So we have a real problem in this country. We've got to restore civil liberties, we've got to end these wars, and 9-11 is the key domino that once we start turning it over, it will start the rest of these dominoes, which are major issues we're facing as country.
[10:42.000 --> 10:54.000]  So that's why we start with 9-11, and to introduce people to 9-11, we start with building 7, because most people don't even know about the third worst structural failure in modern history.
[10:54.000 --> 11:02.000]  This is amazing, really. I mean, we show this to architects and engineers, and they go, what? I would have known about that building if it came down.
[11:02.000 --> 11:20.000]  Well, does it bother you that you didn't? Yes. We show them it came down at 5.20 in the afternoon, a 47-story skyscraper that had a few small fires in it, presumably from the debris that hit it from the Twin Towers.
[11:20.000 --> 11:38.000]  And so this building drops like a rock at freefall acceleration, suddenly, smoothly, symmetrically, right down into its footprint, almost.
[11:38.000 --> 11:51.000]  The center of this pile is 4- to 6-story pile of completely destroyed building. Every structural connection to every other almost severed.
[11:51.000 --> 12:13.000]  And FEMA, who did the first investigation, documents in their appendix C, hot sulfur corrosion attack, the author notes that the ends of the beams were partially evaporated. They note and document that the steel girders look like Swiss cheese.
[12:13.000 --> 12:25.000]  Well, this building, theoretically, came down by, quote, normal office fires. There was no plane that hit it. We're not talking about jet fuel.
[12:25.000 --> 12:44.000]  Normal office fires in a phenomena called thermal expansion, where fires expanded beams and pushed this girder off its seat and caused the internal collapse, they say, of nine floors prior to the overall building coming down.
[12:44.000 --> 13:03.000]  So we have a completely, it just doesn't make sense, what we're told by the official story as the normal office fires versus what is obviously, when you look at it, a controlled explosive demolition.
[13:03.000 --> 13:25.000]  I mean, everybody who sees this building coming down, in fact, you can go to our website right now and see it coming down. It is a World Trade Center 7. The website is AE911truth.org, AE911truth.org.
[13:25.000 --> 13:42.000]  And why didn't, I mean, the official story says, well, well, this building came down by fires. And yet, no high rise has ever come down by fire before or since 9-11.
[13:42.000 --> 14:02.000]  And every high rise that has come down has come down by controlled demolition. And every high rise that's come down by controlled demolition was planned in advance, months in advance, with explosives pre-placed and synchronistically timed floor by floor.
[14:02.000 --> 14:29.000]  And that's the only way you can get a building to do that. This building came down for 100 feet of its fall. It came down at free fall, no resistance from the 40,000 tons of structural steel framing, which was three to five times stronger than it needed to be to hold this building up.
[14:29.000 --> 14:46.000]  And so we have a completely discontinuous event here with Building 7. And when people see this and hear about it, they're then ready to explore what happened at the Twin Towers. And so we can talk about that next if you'd like.
[14:46.000 --> 14:57.000]  Sure. Go ahead, please. And folks, listen, you know, it's really true that 9-11 is the hinge pin for all of this.
[14:57.000 --> 15:07.000]  You hear so often the soundbite, we live in a post 9-11 world and, well, everything's different because of 9-11. Well, that's the way the bad guys want it.
[15:07.000 --> 15:16.000]  And so we've got to expose the truth in order to roll back all these losses of our civil liberties. So please do continue.
[15:16.000 --> 15:28.000]  It's extraordinary with the Twin Towers because here, once again, we're given a story that maybe makes a little more sense. Well, jet planes hit these towers. Massive explosion of jet fuel.
[15:28.000 --> 15:50.000]  Of course, what building could resist against such amazing forces? And we all saw the massive fireball and, you know, intuitively, we as people who have, you know, seen explosions and know they're powerful and were told by experts that the building succumbed.
[15:50.000 --> 16:03.000]  We tie all that together and a lot of people died on that day. That morning was an incredible tragedy and it's very painful. So we don't want to go back there and think about this.
[16:03.000 --> 16:16.000]  We just want to accept the line that was given to us by experts, even though it didn't look anything like a gravitational collapse because that's what they told us.
[16:16.000 --> 16:25.000]  The upper part of the building above the point of jet plane impacts drove the rest of the building down in this incredible crushing.
[16:25.000 --> 16:40.000]  And yet that's not what we see in any of the videos. What we see is that that upper point above the point of jet plane impacts, as in the case of the North Tower, was completely destroyed by itself in the first four seconds.
[16:40.000 --> 16:47.000]  Yes, absolutely. How did that happen if it, you know, this truly was done by airplane damage?
[16:47.000 --> 17:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back. We've got one more segment with Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-Eleven Truth. We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:10.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[17:10.000 --> 17:21.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in store and online.
[17:21.000 --> 17:35.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and pollen boost. We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Birdview Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[17:35.000 --> 17:44.000]  You can lock in a spot place with our silver pool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts. Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[17:44.000 --> 17:53.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half-mile south of Amersham. We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturday, 10-2.
[17:53.000 --> 18:01.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[18:01.000 --> 18:10.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:45.000]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:45.000 --> 18:50.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:12.000]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:12.000 --> 19:22.000]  Look what we got. We asked for a question. I wonder what I didn't know how to answer.
[19:22.000 --> 19:32.000]  Look what I didn't know how to answer. We asked for a question. Look what we got. How they don't ever answer.
[19:32.000 --> 19:52.000]  Okay folks, we are back with Richard Gage, AIA. Okay Richard, you haven't told us the locations of where these events are going to be this coming week.
[19:52.000 --> 20:05.000]  Oh yeah, we left off with Houston. Well on Wednesday, August 15th, we're going to be in San Antonio, actually near San Antonio in a small town that nobody knows about.
[20:05.000 --> 20:13.000]  It's a secret, but I'm going to let you in on it. It's called McQueenie. How many of you know about McQueenie, Texas?
[20:13.000 --> 20:25.000]  Well, the Silver Eagle Taphouse is located there, and that's where we're going to be. And get this. This is a Texas address, and I'm told the Texans know what this means.
[20:25.000 --> 20:33.000]  9301 FM 725. Does that mean anything to you, Deborah?
[20:33.000 --> 20:49.000]  Yes. FM means farm to market. Farm to market road, yes. The Silver Eagle Taphouse, which is actually owned by Ron Avery, who is also an architect who has signed the petition.
[20:49.000 --> 21:13.000]  Indeed. And this is a great venue. It's a full screen. We're talking like 9 feet high and 17 feet wide or something. So be sure to come out to McQueenie, Texas, tell everybody in the San Antonio area to the Silver Eagle Taphouse on Wednesday, August 15th.
[21:13.000 --> 21:23.000]  And then on Thursday, August 15th. Oops, those can't be both. So Thursday would be the 16th. Yes.
[21:23.000 --> 21:36.000]  Oh, dear. 7pm. We're going to be at Unity Church on Greenville. That's 3425 Greenville Avenue in Dallas, Texas.
[21:36.000 --> 21:50.000]  Now, if you didn't have a pen and you're writing and you're freaking out, you're writing in your car, just go to our website when you get back. It's A-E-9-1-1-truth.org.
[21:50.000 --> 22:03.000]  And if you can't write that down, just remember architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth, and you can Google that, get on our website, go to the events section, and all the information is there.
[22:03.000 --> 22:16.000]  Excellent. And for folks out there who don't know where McQueenie, Texas is, if you are in the Central Texas area, San Antonio area, specifically San Marcos, New Braunfels area, Austin area,
[22:16.000 --> 22:35.000]  Burney, any of these places that are looing, that are close to the northern San Antonio area, McQueenie, Texas is actually near New Braunfels. So for folks in Austin, you would take I-35 south toward San Antonio and you would get off somewhere,
[22:35.000 --> 22:48.000]  and I forgot exactly which exit it is, but it's between New Braunfels and San Marcos. So it's on the north side of San Antonio, on the east side of I-35 a few miles.
[22:48.000 --> 23:00.000]  So we've got a few more minutes left with Richard Gage here, and I would like you to please continue your discourse on the Twin Towers while we still have a little time.
[23:00.000 --> 23:11.000]  Oh yeah, this is extraordinary, because we're told this is a gravitational collapse. Well, there's nothing left of the top section, in the case of the North Tower, in four seconds it's completely destroyed.
[23:11.000 --> 23:21.000]  So there's nothing left to push the rest of the building down. And yet, what happens at that point, after four seconds of the 12 second complete destruction of this building,
[23:21.000 --> 23:30.000]  we then have this series of explosions, which first responders here, and they document, and they're seeing flashes of light at the onset of destruction,
[23:30.000 --> 23:43.000]  and this is all recorded in the oral histories by their fire commissioner. 118 of them see and hear this stuff, including the hurling of 4 ton perimeter wall units,
[23:43.000 --> 24:00.000]  laterally at 60 miles an hour in every direction from the Twin Towers, landing up to 600 feet away. Explosions going off up to 60 stories down below this so-called pancaking collapse.
[24:00.000 --> 24:11.000]  Explosions that are spewing pulverized building solids at 200 feet per second. And then we have no floors stacked up at the bottom of these towers.
[24:11.000 --> 24:23.000]  I mean, these are 110 story towers. Each of them are an acre in size. Wouldn't we expect to see a pile of floors down at the bottom?
[24:23.000 --> 24:35.000]  Look at the photos. They show a two-story pile of core columns, perimeter columns, et cetera, but there's no massive amount of concrete floors.
[24:35.000 --> 24:44.000]  There's none. And where is all that stuff? It's completely pulverized in mid-air to a fine powder, as a matter of fact.
[24:44.000 --> 24:55.000]  And this is then ejected and lands in a three-square mile area about Lower Manhattan. What do officials find in all this concrete?
[24:55.000 --> 25:09.000]  Well, they find the USGS in the dust, curiously, billions of iron microspheres. What's iron doing in all the dust samples?
[25:09.000 --> 25:18.000]  It's not from the steel. And it's previously molten. That's how it got spherical.
[25:18.000 --> 25:28.000]  What temperatures are required to melt iron over 2,800 degrees? But jet fuel and office fires don't even get half that hot.
[25:28.000 --> 25:41.000]  So we have evidence of what is actually thermite. Thermite incendiaries. They are used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter.
[25:41.000 --> 25:50.000]  This is absolutely extraordinary evidence that's completely swept under the rug by NIST when they took over the FEMA investigation.
[25:50.000 --> 26:05.000]  They have no explanation of where these molten iron microspheres came from. And yet they're in all the dust samples, up to 6% of the dust samples on top of the Deutsche Bank building, comprising of this.
[26:05.000 --> 26:15.000]  But that's not all that's found. A small team of scientists find in all of their dust samples small red-gray chips.
[26:15.000 --> 26:26.000]  Nanothermite is what it actually is. I mean, they're red on one side, gray on the other. They're composed of extremely small particles of iron oxide and aluminum powder,
[26:26.000 --> 26:37.000]  intimately mixed in the perfect percentage to become thermite. These particles are a thousand times smaller than the human hair.
[26:37.000 --> 26:51.000]  They're built from the atomic scale up. This stuff is not made in a cave in Afghanistan. This is built by the most advanced defense contracting laboratories.
[26:51.000 --> 27:01.000]  What is an explosive incendiary doing in all the World Trade Center dust? Explosive because of this small size.
[27:01.000 --> 27:16.000]  Explosive because of that it's set in an organic bed of oxygen, silica, and carbon. This is really, really important discovery that's peer-reviewed and documented in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal.
[27:16.000 --> 27:27.000]  25 pages of peer-reviewed paper. Uncontested in the scientific literature. There's no peer-reviewed papers contesting this.
[27:27.000 --> 27:37.000]  So this is why 1700 architects and engineers are demanding a real investigation. And this is why you should care.
[27:37.000 --> 27:58.000]  Because, again, 9-11 precipitated two major wars in which a million people have already been killed and which have to stop and which were started from a manipulation of which we call 9-11.
[27:58.000 --> 28:13.000]  We've got to have a real investigation and the only public pressure on the media and the government will produce the truth about what really happened on that day.
[28:13.000 --> 28:28.000]  Absolutely. And we've got to get to the truth of what really happened. And folks, everyone out there, I encourage you to get Richard Gage's film. Go to AE911Truth.org. That stands for Architects and Engineers for 9-11Truth.org.
[28:28.000 --> 28:39.000]  Richard Gage is the founder. Richard Gage, AIA. And get this documentary. The documentary is just incredible. 9-11, explosive evidence, experts speak out.
[28:39.000 --> 28:55.000]  It really is amazing. I mean, I've known most of this information for quite a while, but when you see it all put together condensed and with the most crucial points extracted and put together in this documentary, really, folks, it will blow your way.
[28:55.000 --> 29:05.000]  I mean, it blew me away again seeing it. And like I said, I've already known most of all of this information for quite a while, but it is a highly worthwhile documentary.
[29:05.000 --> 29:20.000]  And I'm looking forward to seeing it again this Wednesday night at the Silver Eagle Taphouse in McQueenie, Texas, which is very close to New Braunfels for folks out there. And you can get that address, get that information off of AE911Truth.org.
[29:20.000 --> 29:33.000]  Yeah. And again, that's at 9301 FM725. That's where the Silver Eagle Taphouse is. And then in Dallas the next day, August 16th, at Unity Church on Greenville.
[29:33.000 --> 29:38.000]  Absolutely. Well, Richard, thank you for joining us tonight. And I'm looking forward to seeing you on Wednesday.
[29:38.000 --> 29:41.000]  Definitely, Deborah. Thank you so much.
[29:41.000 --> 30:00.000]  All right, folks. This concludes our interview with Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth. Please go to his website, AE911Truth.org, and get the documentary 9-11, Experts Speak Out. We'll be right back, folks.
[30:00.000 --> 30:06.000]  A Noble Live, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[30:06.000 --> 30:10.000]  Based on the damage patting to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[30:10.000 --> 30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[30:14.000 --> 30:17.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[30:17.000 --> 30:22.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[30:22.000 --> 30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[30:26.000 --> 30:30.000]  Expose the cover up now at InnobleLive.com.
[30:57.000 --> 31:10.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:21.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, furky products, and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:33.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:37.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:37.000 --> 31:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:57.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays, so give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[31:57.000 --> 32:00.000]  or check out their events page at BraveNewBookstore.com.
[32:02.000 --> 32:07.000]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[32:07.000 --> 32:11.000]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[32:37.000 --> 32:41.000]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:07.000 --> 33:11.000]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:37.000 --> 33:42.000]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[34:07.000 --> 34:17.000]  Now, here are a couple of shows ago. You heard me go through a motion that I wrote regarding the notices that these so-called courts
[34:17.000 --> 34:23.000]  send out that basically amount to nothing more than a form letter.
[34:23.000 --> 34:35.000]  These form letters in absolutely no way, shape, or form comply with the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure constituting a proper summons.
[34:35.000 --> 34:44.000]  There is absolutely nothing in these things that complies with it other than the rudimentary form of it will have your name on it,
[34:44.000 --> 34:54.000]  which is part of the requisites of a summons. It will have the name of the state on it, though it will not say anybody, the authority of the state of Texas.
[34:54.000 --> 35:07.000]  It will have state versus whoever on it. And generally, it will have some sort of court seal, but it will have no authorizing signature.
[35:07.000 --> 35:19.000]  Now, when you go through this piece by piece out of Chapter 23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, you'll find that there are several things very, very wrong
[35:19.000 --> 35:26.000]  with how things are supposed to work and how they are working. And of course, that's true of any aspect of the traffic.
[35:26.000 --> 35:43.000]  Now, I would exhaust myself going through in detail the number of due process, procedural rights, constitutional violations, statutory violations,
[35:43.000 --> 35:55.000]  and just downright immoral, dishonest, crooked, corrupt idiocy that surrounds the traffic schemes in every state of the Union.
[35:55.000 --> 36:04.000]  In fact, when I get done with this second book, that's exactly what that book is going to do. It's going to do a side-by-side comparison of,
[36:04.000 --> 36:14.000]  here's what the law in Texas says is required of you people if this actually is a criminal case. And here is what you're actually doing,
[36:14.000 --> 36:20.000]  proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that there's no way in hell this can ever be a criminal case.
[36:20.000 --> 36:32.000]  Not only are you proving that it's not criminal, you're proving that it's administrative and, by definition, absolutely inapplicable to the people as a whole.
[36:32.000 --> 36:42.000]  See, the one thing they're not getting out of all of this is where the jurisdictional boundaries for administrative procedures are.
[36:42.000 --> 36:52.000]  By definition, administrative procedures are specifically created as special purpose laws. They're special statutes.
[36:52.000 --> 37:06.000]  And an administrative statute is specifically aimed at a given class of people or things. It's not aimed at everybody and everything.
[37:06.000 --> 37:16.000]  An administrative statute, by its very purpose, is limited to a specific classification of people or thing.
[37:16.000 --> 37:25.000]  Now, what do I mean by that? Okay, well, let's take, for example, the administrative statute regarding electricians.
[37:25.000 --> 37:32.000]  The specific class of people are the licensed electricians.
[37:32.000 --> 37:47.000]  The specific class of subject is installation of wiring and all its accessories, you know, to supply power to a home or building for commercial purposes.
[37:47.000 --> 37:55.000]  You can install electrical wiring in your house and not have to have a license. You can absolutely do that because you're not getting paid for it.
[37:55.000 --> 38:04.000]  The license only comes into play when you're going to take it out and use it to wire somebody else's house and get paid for it or somebody else's property and get paid for it.
[38:04.000 --> 38:23.000]  So by definition, the administrative rules and statutes surrounding the occupation of licensed electrician, the business of engaging in installing electricity and wiring and things of that nature into someone's property.
[38:23.000 --> 38:31.000]  Those are the things the administrative rules, regulations and statutes actually attach to.
[38:31.000 --> 38:48.000]  They don't attach to the general public who is not asking or attempting to be a licensed electrician or actively engaging in commercially installing wiring and other electrical devices in homes and businesses.
[38:48.000 --> 39:04.000]  So when you understand where that classification line gets drawn, that makes understanding the transportation issue that we deal with on these Monday night shows and sometimes the other show, but also in our classes.
[39:04.000 --> 39:25.000]  These issues still come down to who is the particular class of people to whom those regulatory statutes apply and the class is licensed operators and licensed drivers.
[39:25.000 --> 39:43.000]  The class of subject is commercial transportation or any form of commercial use of the roads because any such use is an extraordinary use, okay?
[39:43.000 --> 39:51.000]  Extraordinary meaning that it is not the common and ordinary purpose for which the roads were designed.
[39:51.000 --> 40:11.000]  Now, when you start looking at it from that perspective and you go back and look at all the case law that exists on that subject, it becomes very, very clear that somewhere along the line the government decided that it could just stop being a servant and start lying to the people that created it.
[40:11.000 --> 40:13.000]  You and I.
[40:13.000 --> 40:30.000]  See, the problem with today's government is for some reason these idiots think that their job by definition is inherent and that it exists as a matter of right, that government itself exists as a matter of right.
[40:30.000 --> 40:33.000]  And that's absolutely not true.
[40:33.000 --> 40:54.000]  Government is an entirely fictional created entity and we the people created it, not the people in public office, but we the people created the government department, the office, if it exists at all under our Constitution, we created it.
[40:54.000 --> 41:05.000]  And if it isn't one created specifically within the language of the Constitution, then by definition it's one that's administrative because it was created by the legislature.
[41:05.000 --> 41:18.000]  And the only departments the legislature can create that are not specifically allocated by the Constitution are administrative offices and agencies.
[41:18.000 --> 41:43.000]  Now, since we the people never agreed to be bound by any law other than the general laws of our state, that we authorized the legislature to make as long as those general laws never violated the Bill of Rights or any provision of the Constitution of Texas, then they can enact it.
[41:43.000 --> 41:55.000]  Okay, but that doesn't mean they get to enact one that takes over our life, which is the basis of virtually everything that created for the last six decades or more.
[41:55.000 --> 42:03.000]  But folks, this will continue as long as we remain ignorant of what our rights actually are.
[42:03.000 --> 42:11.000]  And I am where I am simply because I refuse to remain ignorant any longer.
[42:11.000 --> 42:27.000]  There was too many things being shoved down my throat, figuratively speaking, as far as, well, this is why it works this way and this is why you don't have any ability to prevent us from doing it or to argue against it and so on and so forth.
[42:27.000 --> 42:48.000]  Excuse me, but you work for me. Where did you get the power and authority as my employee to tell me how I can and cannot respond to what you do, that I can't fire you, that I can't charge you with a crime, that I can't hold you accountable.
[42:48.000 --> 43:00.000]  I can't dock your pay. I can't kick you out of office. I can't take away your job. Where did you as the hireling get the authority to tell me that I can't do that?
[43:00.000 --> 43:13.000]  Oh, well, it's because you're one guy and 50,000 people elected me. So you're saying that you can only be kicked out of office if the majority of the people agree that you commit crimes.
[43:13.000 --> 43:23.000]  Since when is that a necessity? Since when does 50% of the population have to agree that a guy that committed burglary committed burglary?
[43:23.000 --> 43:34.000]  You know, that doesn't, isn't the way it works. It only takes one to accuse you of the crime. It only takes one to swear out a complaint against you for the crime.
[43:34.000 --> 43:43.000]  So what makes you think I have no power and authority? Oh, that's right. You're in concert and collusion with your other hireling individuals to protect your jobs.
[43:43.000 --> 43:46.000]  That's the only reason you get away with what you do.
[43:46.000 --> 44:00.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. I will continue on on the other side, so let's get in line and get on the phone. We'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:34.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:56.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:09.000]  The Oklahoma City Bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story. Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.000 --> 45:17.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.000 --> 45:24.000]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah Building and detonated it.
[45:24.000 --> 45:32.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the faithful John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:50.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:50.000 --> 45:57.000]  including when he rented the Ryder truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:02.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:02.000 --> 46:31.000]  Music playing...
[46:31.000 --> 46:38.000]  This is a quote, see if you can remember who said it if you've ever seen it or heard it before.
[46:38.000 --> 46:48.000]  Our legislators are not sufficiently apprised of the rightful limits of their power, that their true office is to declare and enforce only our natural rights,
[46:48.000 --> 46:51.000]  and to take none of them from us.
[46:51.000 --> 47:01.000]  No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.
[47:01.000 --> 47:09.000]  And the idea is quite unfounded that on entering into society, we give up any natural right.
[47:09.000 --> 47:17.000]  Well, for those of you that don't know, or those of you that may do know, that is a quote of Thomas Jefferson.
[47:17.000 --> 47:28.000]  It was a quote that is taken in part, well in full, but in different sections of a letter that he wrote to Francis W. Gilmer, June 27th of 1816.
[47:28.000 --> 47:32.000]  And you can find that out of the writings of Thomas Jefferson.
[47:32.000 --> 47:37.000]  I believe it's volume 10, page 32.
[47:37.000 --> 47:59.000]  But the point being exactly what he's saying, that the legislature only has the authority when it comes to the people and the general laws to write laws that are directed specifically at the protection of the rights and property of the individuals in that state.
[47:59.000 --> 48:02.000]  That's it.
[48:02.000 --> 48:13.000]  Anything else they do is a law related to government function, and that law is only binding on government functionaries.
[48:13.000 --> 48:27.000]  Any other law that they may do in addition to that is to regulate an activity that is specifically more than potential, it's imminently potential to cause harm to the public.
[48:27.000 --> 48:38.000]  Now, transportation on the highways may or may not fall in every case into an imminent threat to the public, but it certainly is a potential one.
[48:38.000 --> 48:59.000]  And I'm not really sure most of the time whether I would agree that the way they go about doing it is valid or not, though I would agree that when we're dealing with corporations that because of the profit motive of the corporation in lieu of the public safety motive of the corporation and the rights of individual protection motive of corporations,
[48:59.000 --> 49:19.000]  all of which are nonexistent, then I would say reasonable regulation of those entities and their use of the roads is more than necessary, because not only will they use it for profit and gain, they will do it at the expense of the rest of us whenever and however possible.
[49:19.000 --> 49:37.000]  If they weren't forced to pay for the damage they caused to the roads with these larger trucks and loads that they carry, if they weren't forced to keep those trucks and their accessories and trailers and things in good working order, they would rapidly become a public safety hazard
[49:37.000 --> 49:56.000]  coming down the road with a 40 ton load on the back of them. So, yeah, I can see where that became the idea of necessity, especially considering that in the early days of America, they didn't have ways to identify individual cars and such.
[49:56.000 --> 50:11.000]  There was lots of hit and run accidents by these large vehicles on the highways and no one could identify who had killed or injured the person or property in question simply because they could hit, run and that was that.
[50:11.000 --> 50:28.000]  Now, I'm not advocating the marking of private automobiles with license plates or any other types of tags or individual identification, don't get me wrong, but for those that deal in the commercial aspects, I can understand it to a degree.
[50:28.000 --> 50:37.000]  But they're taking that aspect and they're trying to apply it in a general sense and that, of course, you all know I wholeheartedly disagree with.
[50:37.000 --> 50:47.000]  So, that being said, let's go ahead and start taking our calls. We've got several people up on the board. We're going to start with Rick in Texas. Rick, what can we do for you?
[50:47.000 --> 50:54.000]  Hey, how's it going? So, I've been listening to you guys for some while and I met you well.
[50:54.000 --> 50:57.000]  Okay, Rick, are you outside or on a cell phone or something?
[50:57.000 --> 50:58.000]  I'm driving.
[50:58.000 --> 51:06.000]  Okay. Well, try to hold the phone a little bit closer to your, don't use the speakerphone because we can't hardly hear you.
[51:06.000 --> 51:08.000]  I'll try to speak for a while. Is that better?
[51:08.000 --> 51:11.000]  That's a little better, though you're distorting some.
[51:11.000 --> 51:25.000]  Okay. So, from what I'm seeing you guys, I was able to send a validation letter to a collection agency about a collection that I have through a leasing, through a lease.
[51:25.000 --> 51:36.000]  And they didn't answer after the three days. Is there? And it still shows up on my credit report. So, am I supposed to send them like another letter?
[51:36.000 --> 51:39.000]  Or do you have the Michael Mirris package that's on the website?
[51:39.000 --> 51:41.000]  The Michael Mirris?
[51:41.000 --> 51:42.000]  Yes.
[51:42.000 --> 51:47.000]  I didn't exactly use that one by crafting my own validation letter.
[51:47.000 --> 51:56.000]  Okay, Michael Mirris' course has a complete step-by-step procedure that he's got fully documented on how to go after these guys.
[51:56.000 --> 52:04.000]  Believe me, what you pay to get that is going to be nothing to what you'll get paid to make them go away.
[52:04.000 --> 52:14.000]  So, it's worth the investment. Spend a little bit of money that that costs so that you can get these people out of your hair and they'll wind up giving you more than you paid for the course.
[52:14.000 --> 52:20.000]  That's for sure. So, they, because I've actually been contacted by them several times actually two years ago.
[52:20.000 --> 52:32.000]  Yeah, well, the problem is is we have no way of knowing what you sent them. We also have no way of knowing without going through it piece by piece how it does or doesn't comply with what you're required to do.
[52:32.000 --> 52:42.000]  Whereas if you use the Michael Mirris package, those letters and everything that you have to do are already written. All you got to do is fill in the blanks and mail them.
[52:42.000 --> 52:53.000]  Yeah, well, that's for sure. They're not dressing up to end up getting that because it's a $3,000 collection, incorrect debt from a department complex.
[52:53.000 --> 52:57.000]  So, yeah, I guess I'll just get into getting that Michael Mirris.
[52:57.000 --> 53:03.000]  That would be the best way to go because I'm really not going to be able to tell you what to do, not knowing what you've already done.
[53:03.000 --> 53:11.000]  And I'm especially not knowing whether or not it complies with the fair debt collection practices that Michael Mirris has already got everything set up for.
[53:11.000 --> 53:15.000]  Okay, I understand that. That's cool. All right, I appreciate it.
[53:15.000 --> 53:17.000]  All right, Rick, thanks for calling in.
[53:17.000 --> 53:18.000]  Thank you. Have a good day.
[53:18.000 --> 53:24.000]  You too. All right, now we're going to go to Kevin in Virginia. Kevin, what can we do for you?
[53:24.000 --> 53:25.000]  Hey, Eddie, how do you do?
[53:25.000 --> 53:27.000]  I have so far so grand.
[53:27.000 --> 53:37.000]  Just wanted to have a listen to you guys and think it's somewhat applicable to Virginia as well. So I started researching it and wanted to get your thoughts if you'd ever dealt with anybody in Virginia.
[53:37.000 --> 53:49.000]  Actually, I lived in Centerville, Virginia up there for almost a year. I worked over in Rockville, Maryland doing a sprint migration for a network over there when Sprint bought a company.
[53:49.000 --> 53:57.000]  And I also worked on a project down in D.C. for the United States Congress while I was there. I'm the guy that wrote the federal budget software they were supposed to be using.
[53:57.000 --> 53:58.000]  Oh, that's interesting.
[53:58.000 --> 54:11.000]  Yeah, I live in the southwestern part of the state, but travel a good bit. And right now, I'm not in any violation of the traffic code, so I'm trying to stay away from it and make sure I cover myself.
[54:11.000 --> 54:25.000]  But I don't know if you've looked at it closely, the traffic code, the laws in Virginia, but I guess you guys always talk about how in Texas it doesn't define whether it's criminal, administrative, or civil.
[54:25.000 --> 54:50.000]  But by the way they proceed, it's obviously not criminal. But in the Virginia code, it actually comes straight out and says traffic and traction are violations of public order as defined in section 46.2-100, which is all the definitions under the transportation code and not deemed to be criminal in nature.
[54:50.000 --> 54:56.000]  So it seems to me that I'm a half a step ahead of the game because they've already defined that it's not criminal.
[54:56.000 --> 54:59.000]  Yeah, but what did they define it as?
[54:59.000 --> 55:20.000]  Well, then if you go, the reference that they put in the 46.2-100 is just basically all the definitions related to transportation code and then it goes, traffic and traction means a violation of law punishable as provided in 46.2-113, which is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor.
[55:20.000 --> 55:45.000]  And you go to that section and then it basically says that if you violate the code, unless otherwise stated, these violations shall constitute traffic and traction punishable by a fine of not more than provided for a class 4 misdemeanor under the normal criminal code.
[55:45.000 --> 55:48.000]  So it seems kind of circular to me that they don't really...
[55:48.000 --> 56:01.000]  No, they're simply saying that the fine assessed is no greater than the fine assessed for a class 4 criminal misdemeanor. That isn't meaning they're classifying it as a criminal act.
[56:01.000 --> 56:06.000]  They're simply saying that the fine is the equivalent of.
[56:06.000 --> 56:08.000]  Okay.
[56:08.000 --> 56:13.000]  And well, that's kind of what I'm trying to figure out is what then they are defining, whether it's...
[56:13.000 --> 56:24.000]  Defining it as an infraction, if it specifically says that it's not criminal, then there's only two other possible kinds that can be civil or administrative.
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  Correct.
[56:25.000 --> 56:26.000]  Okay.
[56:26.000 --> 56:34.000]  Now, in particular, administrative in and of itself is a variation of civil.
[56:34.000 --> 56:38.000]  But the difference is, is who the rules apply to.
[56:38.000 --> 56:42.000]  Anything on the administrative is a special statute.
[56:42.000 --> 56:43.000]  Okay.
[56:43.000 --> 56:50.000]  It is specific to a specific class of individual or subject matters or objects.
[56:50.000 --> 56:54.000]  Such as an employee of a city organization or something of that nature.
[56:54.000 --> 56:58.000]  Well, in the case of what we're dealing with, those engaging in transportation.
[56:58.000 --> 56:59.000]  Right.
[56:59.000 --> 57:00.000]  Right.
[57:00.000 --> 57:06.000]  Now, is the term transportation defined in Virginia?
[57:06.000 --> 57:09.000]  No, not in this section, not that I have found.
[57:09.000 --> 57:17.000]  Well, search all of them because just like Texas, if memory serves me correctly, when I was up there looking, it didn't exist there either.
[57:17.000 --> 57:18.000]  Okay.
[57:18.000 --> 57:21.000]  Now, they do define vehicle, motor vehicle.
[57:21.000 --> 57:22.000]  Oh, yeah.
[57:22.000 --> 57:32.000]  They always define the accoutrements, but they never define the administrative subject to which those accoutrement rules apply.
[57:32.000 --> 57:34.000]  See, it's only a vehicle.
[57:34.000 --> 57:37.000]  Let me, folks, let me give you a little clue here.
[57:37.000 --> 57:44.000]  If you want to understand the definitions in any given statute, period, I don't care what the statute is.
[57:44.000 --> 57:55.000]  If you want to truly understand when you read the definition at the end of the definition, also add the context.
[57:55.000 --> 58:06.000]  For instance, vehicle, a device used for transporting persons, property or goods on a highway for the purpose of engaging in transportation.
[58:06.000 --> 58:09.000]  That's the context.
[58:09.000 --> 58:10.000]  Okay.
[58:10.000 --> 58:15.000]  Kevin, so think about that for a minute and we'll finish up the call on the other side of the break, okay?
[58:15.000 --> 58:16.000]  Okay, thank you.
[58:16.000 --> 58:19.000]  Okay, folks, this is rule of law radio.
[58:19.000 --> 58:20.000]  This is our top of the hour break.
[58:20.000 --> 58:22.000]  We got one hour left in the show.
[58:22.000 --> 58:26.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:26.000 --> 58:31.000]  Hannibal, I see you there, so also please hold till we get back and I get finished up with Kevin.
[58:31.000 --> 58:33.000]  Come on, folks, we got an hour to go.
[58:33.000 --> 58:37.000]  Give me something to talk about besides my own days of the week.
[58:37.000 --> 58:39.000]  We'll see you on the other side of the break.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 59:57.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  GPS is supposed to help drivers get from point A to point B, but in Australia, it led a trio of Japanese tourists on a voyage into the sea.
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:17.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht. Back to tell you about a navigational disaster next.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  GPS is supposed to make driving a snap, guiding motorists with the aid of satellites.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  But in Australia, it lowered a trio of students from Tokyo to drive their rental car straight into the Pacific Ocean.
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  On their way to North Stradbroke Island, the GPS told them to cross Moriton Bay.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  At low tide, the coast looked clear, but then the road turned to mud.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  Keep going, the GPS said, and the water began rising. Keep going, the GPS said.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  Within minutes, their car was stuck in the rising waters of the South Pacific, and the students were sloshing back to shore.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  The moral here? When in doubt, let your common sense, not your GPS, be your guide.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  The next time the doctor asks you how you feel, ask him the same question. Why?
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  New research shows unhappy doctors perform differently than their contented counterparts.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht with details in a moment.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  We've long suspected it, and now a new study confirms it.
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  A doctor's mood impacts their professional behavior towards patients.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  A survey of nearly 200 Israeli physicians found that on bad mood days, doctors spent less time talking with patients.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  But more prescriptions ordered more tests and issued more referrals, often unnecessarily.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  All of this, of course, leads to higher healthcare costs.
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:43.000]  But when the doctors were in a good mood and felt less burnout, they consulted more with patients,
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  diagnosed their conditions with fewer tests, and prescribed less expensive medicines.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  Let's see, less caregiver stress, less burnout, and better patient care sounds like just what the doctor ordered.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:23.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  All right, folks, as you may well know, also, we still have the ongoing need for your financial support,
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  not only for the radio station. Please don't forget to give to that or to the network, rather.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  But also, remember, we still have an ongoing need to collect funds for the federal lawsuit.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  So please donate to that whenever you can. That money is very, very important.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  It's getting us into the federal courts to try to carry forward these traffic cases.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  It's going to give us a way to get in there and get new precedent set to get this stuff overturned.
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  But we need your financial support to get there, so please visit the website and please click on the donate to the lawsuit button,
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  as well as the one to the network.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  All right, folks, let's go back to Kevin. All right, Kevin, let's continue.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  The other question I had was, and I would imagine other states in Texas probably like this as well,
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  they have a section that defines commercial vehicles and commercial motor vehicles as, you know, large trucks over 26,000 pounds.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  Yeah, let me give you the quick rundown on the difference between the commercial vehicle and a vehicle.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  There's only three. One, the weight of 26,000 or more pounds, 26,001 pounds or more.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Two, more than 16 passengers, including the driver.
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  Three, hazardous materials placarded vehicle.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Right, and I believe that it goes on to define those things in this section.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  Right.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  So that's not a problem, then, that saying I'm still not engaged in commerce, they're not going to...
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  No, they're all commercial vehicles. They just gave commercial title to the bigger ones.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  Okay, that's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  Yeah, they're all being used for the purpose of commerce.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  They just specifically designated these much larger or more dangerous ones with the actual term commercial in their name.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  Right, which, interestingly enough, in that section goes on to exclude from the definition of commercial motor vehicles any vehicle
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  when used by an individual solely for its own personal purpose, such as personal recreational activities.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  Yeah, well, do you play golf?
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  Yeah.
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  Okay, then you know what a driver is, right?
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Correct.
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  You know what a putter is?
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  Correct.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  A wood?
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  Yep.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  Well, what's the one thing all of those have in common despite the name?
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  They're all clubbed.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Exactly.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  Right, so they're all vehicles and they've just fed vehicle in there as well, so they're still saying you're engaged in commerce
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  or just not subject to this section of the larger code if you're operating a larger, truly commercial...
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  If you're in commerce under 26,001 pounds without a hazardous materials placard with less than 16 passengers including the driver.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  Right, so it sounds like to me from what I've read and from what you're saying, Virginia is very similar in that if I, as long as I avoid,
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  avoid those words of commerce, driver, operator, vehicle, I'm not subject to their motor vehicle code.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  That's probably correct.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  There's a little bit more to it than that.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  It's knowing not only what to say, but specifically what not to say, you are correct in that category for sure.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Okay.
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:07:06.000]  Never use their terms to reference what you are doing because that's an acquiescence to the argument that you're engaging in the
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  Regulatable Activity.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  Right, the minute you hand over your status, your driver's license and registration, I've passively admitted...
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:24.000]  The presumption goes like this, you pull me over, I'm not engaging in transportation or commerce.
[01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  Oh, you want the license that's used to regulate me for the purposes of transportation or commerce.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  Okay, here you go.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  Thus by agreement, you have now said, even though I said I wasn't, here's proof that I am.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  Correct.
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  Yeah, which I've taken that out of my wallet and do no longer...
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  Unless I'm actually engaged in commerce, I no longer carry that with me for that purpose.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  Yeah, it's a whole lot easier not to produce it when you don't have it on you.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  Exactly.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  That's my feelings.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  I've just taken it out and left it...
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  I actually have a state ID issued by...
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  Just an ID issued by another state that identifies who I am.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Right.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  So that was generally my question I thought so.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  The other interesting thing I find is that I haven't traced it through quite enough to gain comfortable with them, I'm sure,
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  but it appears to me that both the department...
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  Hang on, Kevin, you're breaking up really bad there.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  You said it appears to me...
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  It appears to me that the Motor Vehicle Department and the Transportation Department are under the State Corporation Commission,
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  which by definition in the Virginia Constitution can only regulate corporations.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Probably, but the other place you want to look is the Virginia Administrative Code.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  If both of those agencies are listed with their own title or chapter or something of that nature in the Administrative Code,
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  then it's a 100% guarantee they are state administrative agencies.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  If they are state administrative agencies, they will be subject to your State Administrative Procedures Act,
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  which will almost certainly say that the place having original jurisdiction of anything under these administrative agencies is not a judicial court.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  Right.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  Although I think they try these cases in judicial court.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  Right, but that would be the court acting without proper jurisdiction because the legislature is attempting...
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  If they do it, you'll notice that there's nothing specifically in the statutes that say these courts have jurisdiction over the traffic offenses.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  For instance, here in Texas, it says that the municipal and JP courts have original jurisdictions over class C fine only misdemeanors.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  But what the courts have done is they have defined all misdemeanors in the transportation code as class C fine only yet they're not defined as class C.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  They're simply defined as misdemeanors.
[01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  But the agency is the Department of Public Safety, which specifically is under Title 37 of our Administrative Code.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  Thus, it is a state administrative agency.
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  So when you go to 2001 of the Government Code to the Administrative Procedures Act, it specifically says that the courts do not constitute proper venue for hearings of state administrative agencies.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  Yeah, which is both those, the Department of Motor Vehicles and the Department of Transportation are listed in the Virginia Administrative Code.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  Yeah, which is a clear cut evidence that they are state administrative agencies and subject to that act.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  Right, so as long as I'm not engaged in their regular administrative process or something that they're, you know...
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  In the regular activity.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Right, regular activity, then I'm not subject to their jurisdiction.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  That is correct.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  Okay, that's what I thought, just wanted to... I've been listening to you guys for a while and kind of pulling some of this stuff off the Virginia Code site and reading it and it appears to me that everything you say is correct.
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Yeah, if you don't have it yet, the seminar material, the traffic code book that I wrote for that specifically teaches you how to take those statutes apart and research them so that you can confirm what you need.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  Okay, yeah, that's my next step is to get that to, like I said, I want to be proactive here and know on the front side how to stay out of their jurisdiction.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  Yeah, and that's by never admitting to it in the first place.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  Right.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  Because you will find in most states of the union, all they're required to do, they will convict you on presumption alone without any evidence unless you know how to refute what they're doing.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  You let them build a prima facie case, which just means a case that on first impression is a true case and a correct case.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  Right.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  But if any real facts came to light, it would blow it down like a house of cards in a high wind.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  Right.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  So that is exactly what you have to do is learn how to refute the presumption and the prima facie case they attempt to make.
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  Sounds like a good plan.
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  All right.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  Well, I wish you luck.
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  It's not impossible, but it will be prolonged and difficult.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  That I can promise you.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  Well, luckily for me, I'm a CPA by nature and pretty good at reading these codes and actually deal with the Department of Health on some issues and I'm very familiar with the administrative code and the code of Virginia.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  Yeah, well, be sure and in that case, you're familiar with the fact that the administrative code operates off of cross-reference tables.
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  Right.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  You definitely need to find the cross-reference section between these motor vehicle and transportation statutes and these individual departments.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  Because once you find that cross-reference, it shows you that these chapters of this code are specifically under the authority of this agency and this agency is by definition an administrative agency.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  Now they've got a whole another outlook they've got to come at you from to say that you're in their jurisdiction.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Right.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  Okay.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  All right.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  You're very welcome.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  You have a good evening.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  You too.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  All right, folks.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  Kevin is a good example of exactly what I would hope and pray everyone would become and that's proactive in going against these folks and solving these little problems of misapplication of laws for the purpose of generating illegal revenue through illegal taxation and theft.
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  Because that's what this actually is.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  So the more educated you become, the more effort you put into knowing what to do, the more likely we are to kill this beast and bury it in the back 40.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  Let's do that faster than they can find a way around us doing it.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  All right.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  Next up, Hannibal in New York.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  Hannibal, last name's not Lector, is it?
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  No, no.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  No, how you doing, Eddie?
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  I'm doing good, and you?
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  I'm good, thank you.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  I have a question about, I guess, a civil case I'm going through right now with the city of New York.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  And on their discovery request, they're demanding prior arrest.
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  And I wanted to object to those due to the fact that in my prior arrest that I challenged jurisdiction and the court never had jurisdiction, so the case was dismissed.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  So does that also make the...
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  Okay, they can't use the arrest against you.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  Okay, they can only use the conviction against you.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  Yeah, and I want you to dispute that.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  I would object to relevance.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  Relevance.
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  Yeah, relevance.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Relevance, okay.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  Okay.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  How is the prior arrest relevant?
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  See, the only way they can use the conviction is if they intend to ask for an upgrade to the punishment.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  99 times out of 100, if the other side is looking to raise the punishment level against you, they can only do that based upon prior convictions, not prior arrests, because an arrest is nothing.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  It has to be an actual conviction.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  So whatever you're arrested for is irrelevant.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Were you convicted of the offense associated with the arrest, that's a whole different animal.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  So first thing I would do is object on grounds of relevance.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  How can you use an arrest against me rather than a conviction?
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  Okay, and what about if I have priors, but it was before I knew about my rights in standing up and challenging jurisdiction and...
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Well, the only way not knowing that up front on priors is if the prior was subject matter to begin with.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  If their lack of jurisdiction involves subject matter jurisdiction, then you can raise it.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  If it's any other type of jurisdictional issue and you didn't raise it at the time, it's gone.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  You can't backtrack and fix it.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Hang on, Hannibal, we're about to take a break.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  Tychus, we see you there. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  At Capital Coin & Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Amherst.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturday 10-2.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  The name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Want a low price? Residential and business plans start at only $14.99, and mobile plans start at just $39.99.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  FreedomTelephones.com. Portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984. Right now, we are talking to Hannibal in New York.
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Alright, Hannibal, let's wrap you up here.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  Did you understand what I said about the jurisdictional issues?
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  Yes.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Okay.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  And I have one more question.
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  It's the same of a prior arrest.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  I made a deal with New York City that if I stay out of trouble for six months or a year, all charges will be dismissed.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  Okay, again, that's not a conviction.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  If the charges are dismissed, that's a plea bargain resulting in a dismissal.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  That's still not a conviction.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  Alright, that sounds good.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  So, I can't even, but for something I was given a ticket for, and I ended up paying the fine.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  I still can't challenge jurisdiction even on the part that there was no valid complaint or...
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  Absolutely not.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  The moment you paid to find, you waived any objection to the lack of complaint.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  Alright, alright.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  Alright guys, thank you, Eddie. Thank you very much.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  It helps me big time on this one.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  Well, I hope so. Good luck.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  Alright, thank you.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  You're welcome. Bye-bye.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  Alright, now we're going to go to Ticus in Texas. I do have that right, correct, Ticus?
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  Ticus?
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  Ticus, okay. What can we do for you, Ticus?
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  Well, actually, I wanted to, uh, moan and complain about, you know, not being able to go to my county court and sue the federal government over the 911.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  Ticus, whatever you got played in the background, can you turn it down to interfere with our ability to understand you?
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  Absolutely. Yeah, well, it's a bad idea to set up anyway.
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  Um, is it not as easy as calling your vehicle instead of using the word vehicle, complain?
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  You can use any word you want, as long as it's not theirs.
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  That's why, that's exactly what I wanted to say.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  You can call it my corn dog if you want to.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  Um, but then you can't be held to the transportation code.
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  Not in, well, no, wait a minute.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  As long as you don't use their word.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  No, not true.
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  If they can prove that you're engaged in the regular activity, whether you're using their terms or not, the active engaging in the regular activity is the proof if they've got the information they can use to substantiate it.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Now, that usually requires the production of a logbook, a bill of lading, or some accouterment of the activity, such as your license, registration, and proof of financial responsibility.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  You produce those things, then you're producing the accouterments associated with the regular activity of transportation.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  Therefore, the prima facie case is you're engaging in transportation.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  In other words, you have to sign up for the guy's, you know, requirement.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  But if you don't sign up to those, can you not still operate?
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  If you choose not to sign up for the, you know, Social Security...
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  Okay, it's assuming you understand the difference between operate and drive here.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  An operator does not have to be a driver.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  A driver is not necessarily an operator.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  They are different licenses.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  An operator can be someone that owns a taxi cab business, but doesn't drive a car.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  They have an operator's license to operate the commercial business.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  But no one can drive the commercial cars without a driver's license, i.e. chauffeurs.
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Well, that's because you're involving someone else.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  No, no, you can both own the taxi company and be the driver.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  In which case you must have both licenses.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  But that's only because you're involving another human being.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  Now, what about if you're just involving yourself and your own personal business?
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  Then how is it even a business?
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  Well, your own business, meaning the things you do to make things happen to your world.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  Okay, well let's talk about the things you do.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  If the things you do is transport property, goods, or persons for hire, you're in transportation.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  If all you're doing is moving your property back and forth from place to place, you're not in transportation.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  No, you're not, you're using it as a conveyance of your personal necessity.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  I'm sorry, what was that last thing, personal what?
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  Necessity.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  Such as?
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Well, I've got to feed myself.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  I've got to get food from point A to point B without it spoiling.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  Okay, how does that equate to anything I've said so far?
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  Well, no, it's actually tightening very well.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  My question is that how can I be regulated in my movement if I need to use some form of transportation for the necessities of my movement?
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  Okay, then if you're using some form of transportation, then you're using something that someone's being paid to transport you in.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Well, I usually use the bus, but you know, in this case, I need to move, alright, I'm a woodworker.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  I made a desk.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  You know, I built some, somebody asked me to make them a desk.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  You know, I had somebody drop off the wood, I ran it through the wood shop and, you know, made it into a desk.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Now I have to get that desk back to that person.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  Okay, but they're not paying you to transport the desk, are they?
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Oh, no.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  No, they paid you to build it, didn't they?
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  Have they already paid you?
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  Well, you know, we get, you know, like 75% down and then, you know, 25% on the, you know, delivery.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  Okay, so between your house and their house, while it's on the road, are you being paid anything by anybody to transport that desk?
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  No, heck no.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  Okay, then again, that's not transportation.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  Until the person pays for what you're bringing them, that property belongs to you.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  As long as the property belongs to you, you can take it up and down the road in your conveyance all day long and nobody can say you're engaging in transportation.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  Even if someone paid you in full for the property and just asked if you could bring it to their house, you're not in transportation unless you are actively engaging in the business of being paid to transport that property.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  Back and forth.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  Yeah.
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  Well, it doesn't matter whether one way or back and forth.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  Well, while you're traveling with a load that you're being paid to carry, no matter what that load consists of, you're in commerce.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  That's in commerce, yeah.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  Okay, cool.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Well, we agree.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  I just want to make sure of that.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Well, that makes perfect sense.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  The one thing I really wanted to talk about, but maybe the topic is not on it, is why I can't walk into my local county court and see the federal government over the lives of everything that got us into where we're at right now.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Anyway, I'll let you go and help these other people out.
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  You're welcome.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  You're a very, very bright individual.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  I don't know about that.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  If I'm so bright, how do I get support?
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  Well, you know, even a filament has to run out over time.
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  I guess so.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  All right.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  Thanks for calling in, Tasha.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  Peace.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  All right.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  Now we're going to go to Daniel in Texas.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  Daniel, what can we do for you?
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Yes, Eddie.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  When you're arrested, let me say I was arrested for a felony possession of marijuana when I only had 14 grams.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  The felony is over 112 grams.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  I pointed that out to the officer that it was a class C misdemeanor that he could write me a ticket for it and we could go start the proceedings, you know, the court proceedings.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  But instead, he chose to arrest me and charge me with a felony possession.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  I was released 20 hours later and when I went and retrieved some of the paperwork from them, it showed that I only had 14 grams.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  Is there a way to go back and, you know, you had a caller, one of your previous callers, talking about arrest and convictions.
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  So I was arrested with no conviction.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  Is there a way to go back and clear an arrest?
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  Well, sure there is, as long as you don't ever get convicted.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  Right.
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  The reason why I ask that is, at times, they're using the, I suppose they are, it's a presumption.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  It seems like at times, the day, maybe, I don't know, police officers are able to see that you've been arrested before or not or a judge.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  Yes.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  Was that a yes?
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  Yes, they can.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  The arrest stays in the system.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Even after they tell you they've purged it, it never goes away.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  Right.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  There's no way to purge it, is there?
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Yes, there is.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  There's a statutory mandated way to purge it, in fact.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  The problem is, is you can't purge it as long as there's the possibility of pending charges related to the arrest.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Which means you can't purge it inside of the statute of limitations for the offense that you were charged with during the arrest.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  Okay.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  Can you carry over?
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  Yes, I can.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  If you'll hang on, we'll do just that.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Yes.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Alright, folks.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  This is the Monday Night Traffic Show.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  We've got two segments left after this break, so give us a call.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  Or you're going to be listening to me, John Jack, for the rest of the evening when we get done with Daniel.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Alright folks, we'll be right back.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  We deserve the truth.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  Rememberbuilding7.org today.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  Thank you for watching.
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  See what our powders, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:48.000]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  We only have one caller up on the board.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  That's Daniel.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  We got a half an hour to go.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Come on folks, give us a call.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  512-646-1984.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  Alright, Daniel, you were asking about purging of arrests and things of that nature.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Correct.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  In statute of limitations, and you all mentioned, you might not be able to purge the arrest
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  if there is an investigation continuing.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  I believe those were your words.
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:15.000]  Well, okay.
[01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  This is the way it's going to work.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:26.000]  You cannot purge the arrest within the statute of limitations for the charges that were levied against you at the time of the arrest.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  You're being used as the basis for the arrest unless those charges are specifically dismissed with prejudice or after jeopardy has attached and they get dismissed.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  In which case, any attempt to re-institute those charges, like for instance, the day of trial, they suddenly decide they don't have enough evidence to convict.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  And they've already impaneled the jury and made the complaint and got the indictment and they dismiss.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  Well, the dismissal can only be with prejudice.
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  Any attempt to prosecute you after jeopardy has attached becomes a violation of the double jeopardy clause.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  Okay.
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  All right, so if the result would be double jeopardy, the case is dismissed with prejudice or it is outside of the statute of limitations, then you can seek the statutory method of having it scrubbed off your record.
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  What's the time frame on the statute of limitations?
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  It depends on the offense.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  Certain ones are one year, certain ones are two years, certain ones are five years.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  How about a felony marijuana possession?
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  I haven't looked, but I believe it's two years.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  Two years, it's been four years.
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  Okay.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  Well, again, you have to look at it to verify.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  Okay.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  Because some felonies will be two, some felonies will be five.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  For instance, there are certain types of robberies that have a longer statute of limitations in some states.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  Now, according to this, you're here in Texas, so I believe in Texas it's going to be two years.
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Okay.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  I'll look it up and find out.
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  Okay.
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  And then, so what's the process to purge the arrest?
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  The process for it is actually codified in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  Okay, Code of Criminal Procedure, okay.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  Okay.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  It'll be, I think it's somewhere, it's either in the 20s or the 30s, the procedure for having that removed.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  But it's in there somewhere, I know.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  I've looked at it.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  I just, I haven't committed that to memory because our whole objective here is not to have to worry about it to begin with.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Yes.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  That answers my question, Eddie.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  All right, well, I appreciate you calling.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  Anything else?
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  No, that's it.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  You have a great night, okay?
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  You too.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  All right, folks.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  Caller board is officially empty.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  So, given that, you're going to start listening to me all over again.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  See what you put yourselves through when you don't call in and ask questions.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  All right.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  While we're waiting on another caller, there is something else I'd like to go through here.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  Now, in the new book that I'm doing on the procedures in the courts relating to transportation offenses and other types of misdemeanors and such,
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  we come to the issue of the terminology where we have the court saying that we have this waiver of rights that we don't specifically reserve
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  by declaring them and demanding them at the time that we appear in the court or go through the process or whatever.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Now, there's a little problem I have with this doctrine.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  This doctrine that the court's fabricated out of thin air basically states that if you don't preserve a particular right at a particular time,
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  at a particular point in a proceeding, then that right will be presumed to have been waived and there will be no recourse to get that right back later.
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  Now, in some of these cases, the courts have ruled that that includes unalienable rights.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  Now, here is the reason for my problem with the doctrine.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  The doctrine specifically says that the right is waived, so we need to know what waived actually means.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  So, if we go down and we look at waived as far as legal definitions, we can see waive means to abandon or forsake.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  To waive signifies also to abandon without right, waiver, the relinquishment or refusal to accept of a right.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  In practice, it is required of everyone to take advantage of his rights at a proper time and neglecting to do so will be considered as a waiver.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  If, for example, a defendant who has been misnamed in the writ and declaration pleads over, in other words, enters a plea of any kind,
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  he cannot afterwards take advantage of the error by pleading in abatement for his plea amounts to a waiver.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Wave, to abandon, throw away, renounce, repudiate or surrender a claim, a privilege or a right to give up right or voluntarily.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  Well, that completely flies in the face of the definition of unalienable.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Unalienable, incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  Sold in this case would also equivocate to surrender.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  Inalienable rights, rights which can never be abridged because they are so fundamental.
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  Inalienable, not subject to alienation, the characteristics of those things which cannot be bought, sold or transferred from one person to another,
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  such as rivers and public highways and certain personal rights, e.g. liberty.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  Now, notice there's going to be a difference between unalienable and inalienable, and here it is.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  Inalienable rights, rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  This is my problem when people refer to their rights as inalienable versus unalienable.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  Unalienable cannot be surrendered voluntarily or otherwise. Inalienable can be surrendered.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  Now, if the court is saying that we have automatically waived an unalienable right, then that doctrine is false on its face.
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  We cannot possibly waive an unalienable right.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:07.000]  So the only way this doctrine can stand is if the court is able to convert an unalienable right into an inalienable right.
[01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  And I don't believe we gave them that authority, because all that would give them is the ability to declare all of our rights inalienable,
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  thus they are all waivable, thus they can all be surrendered, and none of them are inalienable or unalienable, and we're all screwed.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  That, folks, is the path of our public servants called judges.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  All right, right now we have a couple of other callers. Gene and Harold, we're going to go to Gene. Gene, what can I do for you?
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  Hey, good evening. I have a municipal question.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Okay.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  For zoning and property and the condition of property, et cetera, my understanding is that, and in fact, in this state, it says that it has to be injury in fact.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  Okay. However, the city doesn't, you know, they apparently feel that they have the right to do whatever they want, you know, whatever they put in.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  Well, of course they do. Aren't they your masters?
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  Well, they think they are, yeah.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  And the problem that I have here is that, and what I'm finding confusing, and I'm not sure how to put this all together, because I can't find all the details regarding it.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Okay. It's, I'm sure it's not hidden, but neither does it come out and jump me and bite me in the nose.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  All right. And that is where normally the attorney general handled a public nuisance.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  Okay. And on the other hand, you had a private party, okay, who would under, you know, would file a tort, okay, for a private nuisance.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  You know, you're invading somebody else, your next door neighbors, because your noise is keeping him awake.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Okay. So how then does the municipality get in the middle of all this, and, and, and the, we have in our town annutions department, which is exactly what they are.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  All right. And they file the suit against, against the property owner. How, you know, and then when you talk to the municipal court, they say, well, it's civil.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  Okay. In civil, they still have to show how they have standing to make the claim.
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  In any civil tort, they must be able to show a harm that gives them standing or a breach of contract that gives them standing. Where is it?
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Well, I'm sure they're going to claim to that, that ordinance is the breach of contract.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  See, here's the problem most people don't seem to understand about ordinances. You have a constitution in Wisconsin?
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Yep.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  You ready?
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Yep.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  Okay. Who has the power to create law?
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  Well, it would be the legislature.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  Okay. Does the legislature have the power and authority to delegate that power to make law?
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  According to them?
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:37.000]  Yes.
[01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  Uh, no. But hang on just a second. We'll cover that on the other side.
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  All right, folks. This is rule of law radio. We got one more segment. Harold, hang in there. I'll get you when we get done with Gene here.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Uh, after that, I doubt we're going to have time to take any more calls at being our last segment. So, folks, we'll be right back and get this all wrapped up for you.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:23.000]  Music playing.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. We are in our last segment for tonight.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  You're going to have to catch us on Thursday or Friday.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Right now we're going to go back to Gene. Harold, hang in there and I'll get you momentarily.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  Alright Gene, let's see if we can wrap this up.
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  If you check your state constitution, you're going to find that only the legislature has given the power to create law.
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  It will also tell you that every law usually has to contain some sort of enacting clause.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  It must be initiated in either house of the legislature and so on and so forth.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:02.000]  Now, the problem this creates for city and counties in relation to ordinances.
[01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  They cannot be law. They're not authorized to make law.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  As corporate entities, the only thing they can make are rules and regulations.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  And who is subject to the rules and regulations of the corporate entity?
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  The corporate entity.
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  It's employees and those that contract with it.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  Only the employees of McDonald's are bound by the employee handbook and the company rulebook, correct?
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:38.000]  That's correct.
[01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  The customer is not.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  So that works no less different in the realm of ordinances and ordinance is only legally binding under the constitutional laws of your state if you are a city employee or contracted with the city or the county.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  Well, then how about zoning? I mean, if you're finished on that.
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  If you check the ordinances and everything regarding zoning, you will find out very quickly that they can zone property for particular uses, but they have no authority to deprive the rightful owner of that property of using it.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  However, they please as long as what they're doing isn't going to cause a harm to the rights of the other neighbors.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  Okay, I think.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Well, for instance, nobody wants you putting a sun dried fish plant in the middle of a suburban neighborhood.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  And if you don't know what I'm talking about, take a trip to the Orient and Korea, okay, where you can't walk downtown without passing out because all of the meats they eat are drying and salt out in the sun in the middle of the street.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  So they don't really and truly have the authority to assign usage.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  Or they do if they own the property.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  Okay, they can plan for how they want the city to be, but they can't dictate that plan on the rightful property owner unless the business that property owner wants to put on there could be considered detrimental to the rights and welfare of its neighbors.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  For instance, a coal plant in the middle of a suburban neighborhood, not a good thing, a factory that produces lots of toxic smoke and liquids, not good in the middle of a suburban neighborhood.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  And doesn't that require a complaint by then?
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Well, it's a little bit late to complain about all that stuff being spewed in the air after the industry's built.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  But I mean, it would require, I mean, so we're going to go to court, okay, what would we expect them to bring in the court?
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  Well, you can expect them to make the argument they have the authority, but you need to be prepared to make the argument there's no way they can have the authority to do what they're doing.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  See, the one thing about what the examples I'm giving you, it's always dealing with a commercial use of the land.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  If the use is entirely private and it's not meant to be commercial, then there's virtually nothing that they can do unless, you know, it's something like a meth lab, something that can be considered eminently dangerous to the neighbors, even if the use is private.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  For instance, you can't build your own private gasoline storage facility in the middle of your neighbor's homes.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  Right. Okay, that makes sense.
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  All right, so all things considered, when you look at what an ordinance can only be according to the state constitution, then they've got a problem enforcing that ordinance against the people because the people never agreed to be bound by anything other than the general laws of the state.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  So what you need to find out is if this ordinance is actually based on a state law and then whether or not this state law is geared specifically toward a particular regular activity or a special class of people or subject matter.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  Okay, yeah, no, it's not. I mean, they're basically just saying that the property is used for storage and they've got ordinances that talk about storage facilities, all right, and then what they're trying to do is coming over the private with the public and they're using just storage as a naked word.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  Exactly. So you need to know what the definition of the ordinance of storage is and say, excuse me, how do I fault one within your jurisdiction under these ordinances and two, how do you ignore the definition of your own ordinance?
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  Well, they use the word, you know, for all property, they use the word storage as a naked word. It's just storage.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  Okay, no, no, no, no, correction. Wait, wait, wait, back up. You just made their point for them. All property. They don't have authority over all property. Stop assuming they do. That's your first mistake. Don't do that.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  Don't even discuss it as them having authority over all property. There's no way they can have authority over all property. None.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  Right. Well, they use the same, well, I guess what I'm trying to say here and not doing so well is that they use the same statement for all three varieties of property that they have in the ordinance, one of them being private.
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  All right. And they use the naked word storage, you know, like, like, like a naked word odor, they don't say noxious odor, they just say odors, you know, so they use the naked word storage.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  Okay, they don't, you know, for that particular case, for the reference, a commercial activity on a private property, they would use the word storage facility, for instance, okay, but that's no longer a naked word now.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  All right, so that's basically how they're doing it with the private property and then they're coming around to the private properties and saying, oh, we've seen that last time we came around here, so therefore you're storing it and we don't like it, so get it out of there.
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:37.000]  Well, again, they don't have the authority over private property unless what's going on in that private property is a threat to somebody else's property or other rights.
[01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  Okay, I think unless you've got more, I think you've answered my question.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  All right, beat them to death for your state constitution. That's the first place I'd go.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  All right, thank you.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  You're very welcome. All right, now let's go to Harold in Texas. Harold, what can we do for you?
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  Hey, you know, a little while back, I heard you all had Bill Frey on for a month, believe it was Australia. Yes. And he had some very good information, very intelligent.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  You know, bottom line, I listened to a lot of different guys on the radio. You, number one, I try not to miss Monday traffic court. I listened to Alex Jones on a regular basis.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  I listened to Mark Stevens and I kind of liked listening to Dean Clifford out of Canada. And I was just wondering, what's your opinion on how listening to all of these people and gleaming the good things from them?
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  And, you know, I mean, you know, we're all trying to do the same thing. We're just trying to do them in different ways. Yeah, some more successful than others.
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  Well, and yeah, I agree with that. I agree with that. And like I said, I listen to everybody and I try to pick out and gleam the good things, ignore the bad things, a writer, that's another person I've been listening to lately. And, you know, I just wanted to get a kind of appeal.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  What your opinion is in regards to all these people throwing out all kinds of things that we can possibly learn from them. And, you know, that's that's my simple little question. I'll hang up. You can just kind of go where you want.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  Well, as far as my opinion goes, I'm not really sure what that's worth that and $5 will get a cup of coffee these days.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:47.000]  Well, I don't drink coffee anymore. So I got $5, but still okay. Thank you.
[01:55:47.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  Yeah, but my point being that as far as an opinion on them individually, I don't really have one other than everybody's got their, what they feel their responsibility is as to what information is important to get out and what isn't.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  They rely in varying degrees on different things, some of which is more hypothesis and probability than substantive fact or law.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  And that's always, it's good to discuss options and theories. Don't get me wrong.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  Yeah, but once you start taking it into the real world combat, then you better be able to back it up with something hard. Nobody goes to war with an imaginary gun and bullets.
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  I agree 100%. Yeah, and like I haven't done a whole lot of anything and I'm quite frankly, I don't have any court cases, so I don't have to even go try to prove one or the other.
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  And I'd like to keep it that way. But it's just a good thing to, you know, okay, you hear a bunch of stuff. You glean what's good.
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  Maybe you'll try it. Maybe you won't. But it's good information to have.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:09.000]  Let me ask you a question. Do you believe people should be free? Absolutely.
[01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  Do you believe people should have the right to own guns and defend themselves, their property or that of another? Absolutely without a doubt.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  Are you a Christian? Absolutely without a doubt.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  Well, then there is no way in this God's green earth that you're going to avoid conflict much longer. Absolutely without a doubt.
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  So folks, you need to keep that in consideration because you choose to stand up for something you believe in despite who's out there saying that you don't have a right to believe in it.
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  There's no authority for you to support your belief or just any of the multitudes of ways they try to tell you that they're right and you're wrong or they try to force you to believe in their ways.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  You need to understand that this world is coming to a very volcanic place. Absolutely it is.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  And we need to be prepared for that. So any information that gets you thinking is good information as long as it gets you thinking in the right direction.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  That's the way I think. I don't know what's more effective than anything else, but you know what? I need to know as much.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  It's like when you go eat dinner, you're always better off trying a variety of things because with variety, you know, you may find lots of options.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Even though you never actually eat the same thing exactly again, you may like mixing it with something else and it actually works and tastes good.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  Alright Harold, I'm sorry, I got to cut you off. We're about to go off there.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  Alright folks, thank you so much. Everybody that called in, this is Rule of Law Radio, the Monday Night Traffic Show.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  I am your host, Eddie Craig. Thank you so much for listening. Good night. God bless. See you Thursday.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.