[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  Man meets woman on Craigslist and invites her over for a date.
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  Then his wife comes home unexpectedly.
[00:08.000 --> 00:09.000]  What to do?
[00:09.000 --> 00:14.000]  I'll get your cab for an Albrecht and I'll tell you how one cheating husband got what he deserved next.
[00:14.000 --> 00:16.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:16.000 --> 00:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:20.000 --> 00:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:25.000 --> 00:30.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:30.000 --> 00:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:33.000 --> 00:36.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[00:36.000 --> 00:40.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:40.000 --> 00:43.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.000 --> 00:51.000]  In Colorado, 24-year-old Kevin Gaylor invited a woman he'd met on Craigslist to come by his house for a meet-and-greet.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  Just two things conspired to make this a bad idea.
[00:54.000 --> 01:01.000]  One, Gaylor was married, and two, his wife came home unexpectedly just moments before his new friend rang the bell.
[01:01.000 --> 01:03.000]  Did he fess up, you're wondering?
[01:03.000 --> 01:04.000]  Nope.
[01:04.000 --> 01:09.000]  Instead, he called 911 and for some kooky reason claimed that his date was an armed burglar.
[01:09.000 --> 01:15.000]  Officers rest to the house, but the facts soon came out and Gaylor was promptly arrested for making a false report.
[01:15.000 --> 01:20.000]  Somehow, I'm guessing he spent a safer night in jail than he would have at home.
[01:20.000 --> 01:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32.000 --> 01:38.000]  Grasher, we usually associate it with stress and negativity, but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing.
[01:38.000 --> 01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[01:46.000 --> 01:51.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.000 --> 01:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.000 --> 02:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:11.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.000 --> 02:15.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.000 --> 02:22.000]  Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure to cure everything from headaches to constipation.
[02:22.000 --> 02:27.000]  The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control the flow of energy in the human body.
[02:27.000 --> 02:34.000]  Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness.
[02:34.000 --> 02:38.000]  Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6.
[02:38.000 --> 02:42.000]  You'll find it on the inside of your wrist about two fingers width down from your palm.
[02:42.000 --> 02:48.000]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands.
[02:48.000 --> 02:51.000]  But this relief is free and always on hand.
[02:51.000 --> 03:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.000 --> 03:28.000]  What's it going to do?
[03:28.000 --> 03:31.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's it going to do?
[03:31.000 --> 03:33.000]  What's it going to do when they come for you?
[03:33.000 --> 03:36.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's it going to do?
[03:36.000 --> 03:39.000]  What's it going to do when they come for you?
[03:39.000 --> 03:44.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and earn the gold and lose.
[03:44.000 --> 03:51.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool if you're getting hot and you're much just cool?
[03:51.000 --> 03:53.000]  What's it going to do?
[03:53.000 --> 03:55.000]  When they come for you?
[03:55.000 --> 03:57.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what's it going to do?
[03:57.000 --> 04:00.000]  When they come for you?
[04:00.000 --> 04:04.000]  You're chalk it on that one, you're chalk it on this one
[04:04.000 --> 04:11.000]  You're chalk it on your mother and you're chalk it on your father
[04:11.000 --> 04:13.000]  You're chalk it on me
[04:13.000 --> 04:16.500]  Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when you come home?
[04:16.500 --> 04:19.800]  Alright folks, good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[04:19.800 --> 04:23.200]  This is the Monday night of June 11th, 2012.
[04:23.200 --> 04:25.600]  The graphic show. I am your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:25.600 --> 04:28.500]  David Stevens is running our boards tonight.
[04:28.500 --> 04:32.000]  Okay, let's start this week off good.
[04:32.000 --> 04:36.900]  We had a really, really good class yesterday.
[04:36.900 --> 04:40.500]  And I really wish we could get more people attending that class
[04:40.500 --> 04:47.300]  because there is a lot of information that we need to get into your hands
[04:47.300 --> 04:50.800]  regarding how to fight these illegal traffic tickets.
[04:50.800 --> 04:54.700]  We still have the problem. Most folks are running off half-cock
[04:54.700 --> 04:57.700]  thinking they already know what the problem is.
[04:57.700 --> 05:00.200]  And so they go down to argue and say,
[05:00.200 --> 05:03.000]  I just don't, you know, this isn't right and blah, blah, blah.
[05:03.000 --> 05:07.200]  And then they still wind up having to take out their wallet and pay the ticket.
[05:07.200 --> 05:09.100]  Folks, we don't need to be doing that.
[05:09.100 --> 05:15.000]  The last thing in the world we need to be funding is our own abuse, okay?
[05:15.000 --> 05:20.800]  And that's exactly what we're doing by paying these tickets, by acquiescing,
[05:20.800 --> 05:27.600]  by letting them get away with using the law in a manner for which it was never intended.
[05:27.600 --> 05:32.000]  What we do in class is teach you what the law is.
[05:32.000 --> 05:35.200]  We teach you what your rights are.
[05:35.200 --> 05:44.000]  We teach you how to use them effectively to document what these kangaroo courts are doing
[05:44.000 --> 05:51.200]  so that the appellate courts don't have a choice about what they must do later.
[05:51.200 --> 05:55.400]  And that is to overturn the trial court's conviction,
[05:55.400 --> 06:02.700]  which we always go to court with the presumption that it's rigged because it is.
[06:02.700 --> 06:08.000]  And so we don't go to the trial court for the purpose of winning our case.
[06:08.000 --> 06:13.800]  You are kidding yourself if you think you're going to trial to win your case.
[06:13.800 --> 06:18.300]  The system is not set up for you to win at trial.
[06:18.300 --> 06:23.200]  The system is set up where you specifically have to challenge what they are doing
[06:23.200 --> 06:28.200]  and you have to know what you are challenging and how you are challenging it
[06:28.200 --> 06:32.800]  before you will get relief in the appellate court.
[06:32.800 --> 06:38.800]  It is an entirely rigged game, okay?
[06:38.800 --> 06:43.100]  You got just about as much chance beating this on a straight up hand
[06:43.100 --> 06:47.300]  as you do beating the odds in Vegas or Atlantic City.
[06:47.300 --> 06:50.000]  It's just not going to happen.
[06:50.000 --> 06:54.400]  If you've never looked at how a casino operates,
[06:54.400 --> 07:06.200]  they always choose to have gains that the preponderance of the odds always favor the house.
[07:06.200 --> 07:11.000]  They will not enlist any new game in any casino
[07:11.000 --> 07:18.100]  unless the odds of your winning it are below those of the house winning it.
[07:18.100 --> 07:18.800]  Think about that.
[07:18.800 --> 07:19.400]  It has to be.
[07:19.400 --> 07:24.800]  If they did it any other way, casino would not be a business, it would be a charity.
[07:24.800 --> 07:28.600]  They'd turn around and be paying out far more than they'd take in
[07:28.600 --> 07:34.200]  if the game was rigged in favor of the player or was even up.
[07:34.200 --> 07:35.300]  They might make money.
[07:35.300 --> 07:38.800]  They might not make money and they may or may not make the bills next month.
[07:38.800 --> 07:41.000]  No, can't have that.
[07:41.000 --> 07:48.600]  All the games are specifically chosen because the odds favor the house.
[07:48.600 --> 07:57.400]  That is exactly the problem with traffic court except they don't pick different games.
[07:57.400 --> 08:05.800]  They simply sat down and picked different rules by which to play the same game.
[08:05.800 --> 08:10.400]  The problem is they gave you the original rule book.
[08:10.400 --> 08:14.200]  It's what we call the code of criminal procedure.
[08:14.200 --> 08:21.400]  And they went and created themselves a separate distinct rule book apart from that.
[08:21.400 --> 08:22.400]  How do we know this?
[08:22.400 --> 08:24.000]  How can we prove this?
[08:24.000 --> 08:25.600]  Well, that part's easy.
[08:25.600 --> 08:30.800]  That's exactly what we're documenting at trial.
[08:30.800 --> 08:34.400]  The rule book you gave me to play by says you have to do this.
[08:34.400 --> 08:35.300]  You have to do this.
[08:35.300 --> 08:39.600]  You have to do this, but you're not doing those things.
[08:39.600 --> 08:49.800]  So obviously, you're not playing by the same set of rules you gave me to play the game with.
[08:49.800 --> 08:56.000]  If you were, then you would be doing these things, but they're not.
[08:56.000 --> 08:57.000]  And we know that.
[08:57.000 --> 09:00.700]  If you've been to class, you know that because I've pointed out to you.
[09:00.700 --> 09:02.400]  Here's what the law says.
[09:02.400 --> 09:04.200]  Here's what they're doing.
[09:04.200 --> 09:07.600]  Do you see any resemblance whatsoever?
[09:07.600 --> 09:09.700]  None.
[09:09.700 --> 09:13.200]  They're acting like judges when they're supposed to be acting like magistrates.
[09:13.200 --> 09:16.500]  They're acting like magistrates when they're supposed to be acting like judges.
[09:16.500 --> 09:20.600]  They're supposed to be using the rules of criminal procedure for what they're doing.
[09:20.600 --> 09:25.500]  And yet, every time you say you didn't do this rule, this rule, this rule, this rule, this rule, this rule,
[09:25.500 --> 09:27.200]  well, we don't have to do that.
[09:27.200 --> 09:29.300]  Why don't you have to do that?
[09:29.300 --> 09:32.000]  You're the one telling me this is a criminal case.
[09:32.000 --> 09:37.300]  Why do the criminal rules not apply when you're the one doing them?
[09:37.300 --> 09:43.100]  Why don't they apply when you want to tell me I did something wrong in filing a paperwork,
[09:43.100 --> 09:47.400]  in making my argument, in asking for this, that, or the other?
[09:47.400 --> 09:48.400]  Well, you can't do that.
[09:48.400 --> 09:52.000]  The rules I gave you don't allow you to do that as the defendant.
[09:52.000 --> 09:58.100]  Yet, as the prosecution and the one coming against me, I try to hold you accountable for the same rules
[09:58.100 --> 10:01.600]  that says you can do this and you can do this and you can't do that.
[10:01.600 --> 10:03.600]  And you tell me they don't matter.
[10:03.600 --> 10:07.000]  They don't apply.
[10:07.000 --> 10:09.700]  That's idiocy.
[10:09.700 --> 10:17.900]  And if you go into court allowing that idiocy to remain unchallenged, that idiocy will convict you
[10:17.900 --> 10:21.000]  and it will take your money.
[10:21.000 --> 10:24.500]  And it's as simple as that, okay?
[10:24.500 --> 10:31.800]  This requires that you have knowledge of the rules that they are required to follow
[10:31.800 --> 10:37.000]  so that you have knowledge of when they don't.
[10:37.000 --> 10:45.400]  If the rules says they do A and they are doing D, they're not following the rules, are they?
[10:45.400 --> 10:56.200]  And you have to know how to document the fact that rule A was required, but D was what was done.
[10:56.200 --> 11:06.800]  And you can't get to D without going through A, B, and C. And they weren't done either.
[11:06.800 --> 11:14.800]  So folks, this is all about knowing more than they do, which isn't hard, okay?
[11:14.800 --> 11:22.600]  For somebody that's obviously supposed to have a college degree and spend extra time in law school,
[11:22.600 --> 11:29.400]  these are the most repugnantly ignorant people I have ever met.
[11:29.400 --> 11:40.000]  How can you make a living in the profession of law and fail completely in that profession
[11:40.000 --> 11:46.000]  to have ever opened a law book and read it?
[11:46.000 --> 11:55.000]  That's like making someone a master carpenter who has never so much to use to hand solve
[11:55.000 --> 12:02.600]  and telling him we need you to build the Taj Mahal.
[12:02.600 --> 12:07.800]  It's ridiculous. It isn't going to work.
[12:07.800 --> 12:12.000]  Hence, exactly the situation we find ourselves in.
[12:12.000 --> 12:19.600]  The justice system is not broken. It's manipulated.
[12:19.600 --> 12:28.800]  It's manipulated by those that know less than us in what our rights are,
[12:28.800 --> 12:35.000]  but not less than us when it comes to how to defend them.
[12:35.000 --> 12:43.400]  This is up to us, guys. This is where we have to step up and say, we're not putting up with this anymore.
[12:43.400 --> 12:48.200]  I took on that responsibility the day I started reading the traffic code.
[12:48.200 --> 12:53.000]  I took on that responsibility the day I started studying the code of criminal procedure.
[12:53.000 --> 13:00.800]  I'm just one guy, and I want to tell you right now there is nothing special about me
[13:00.800 --> 13:07.800]  in my ability to learn this, to argue this, to know what's right and what's wrong about this.
[13:07.800 --> 13:11.300]  There is nothing special about me.
[13:11.300 --> 13:21.600]  Anyone can do what I do if they are determined enough to change what is.
[13:21.600 --> 13:29.600]  It only takes effort and a willpower to make it happen.
[13:29.600 --> 13:36.600]  And I can't do this by myself. Never for one moment imagined I could.
[13:36.600 --> 13:44.600]  I'm just the one guy. I have to rely on you people to want to know the information I have,
[13:44.600 --> 13:55.600]  the information all of us on this show have, in order to take it and use it to build the world we want.
[13:55.600 --> 14:01.600]  Not the one they want to give us, but the one we want.
[14:01.600 --> 14:06.600]  We want a world where justice is not blind.
[14:06.600 --> 14:14.600]  We want justice to see where it's needed, where it should be applied, how it should be applied.
[14:14.600 --> 14:20.600]  Okay, this justice is blind bull crap the courts have come up with. That's ridiculous.
[14:20.600 --> 14:31.600]  Instead of blind folding and saying justice should be blind, just let her hold up the scales and say justice should be just.
[14:31.600 --> 14:37.600]  Justice is not always fair. Justice is not always equal.
[14:37.600 --> 14:41.600]  But there is a thing as proper justice.
[14:41.600 --> 14:48.600]  And believe me, those people sitting where they're sitting now giving us the crap they're giving us,
[14:48.600 --> 14:59.600]  if they got justice, they wouldn't like it. Not one little bit would they like it.
[14:59.600 --> 15:03.600]  And you can bet on that.
[15:03.600 --> 15:08.600]  So that being said, we got about two minutes before we go to the break. Woody, Joe, I see you there.
[15:08.600 --> 15:14.600]  So if you'll hang on for just a minute, I'll finish this little rant until the break and then we will start taking your calls.
[15:14.600 --> 15:21.600]  But folks, please come to the Sunday classes if you have a means of getting there.
[15:21.600 --> 15:26.600]  I understand not everybody can make it every Sunday and be there every week.
[15:26.600 --> 15:32.600]  I've got regulars that are in there most every Sunday, but not always because life happens.
[15:32.600 --> 15:41.600]  Okay, but we're only going to get as far as we're willing to work together to get.
[15:41.600 --> 15:49.600]  I mean, in the good old days of the pioneers, when something needed done in the community, they all came together.
[15:49.600 --> 15:52.600]  Someone needed a house built or a barn built.
[15:52.600 --> 15:57.600]  They came together and did a barn raising or a house building or a church building or a school building.
[15:57.600 --> 16:01.600]  And the whole community worked together to get it up.
[16:01.600 --> 16:07.600]  And within a day or two, it was ready to be used.
[16:07.600 --> 16:17.600]  Imagine what we can do if we got together and worked together to change what is being done to us.
[16:17.600 --> 16:32.600]  To take it out of the hands of those that want to spoon feed us their version of the world and sit down to a buffet of what we want in our world.
[16:32.600 --> 16:37.600]  We've got choices to make, and each one of them is a personal choice.
[16:37.600 --> 16:41.600]  Get off your backside. Get involved.
[16:41.600 --> 16:47.600]  Whether it be by monetary support, by being there and learning, do what it takes.
[16:47.600 --> 16:52.600]  This is Rural Law Radio, calling numbers 512-646-1984.
[16:52.600 --> 16:59.600]  We'll be right back from the other side of this break.
[16:59.600 --> 17:03.600]  America is in trouble. Washington is a disgrace.
[17:03.600 --> 17:08.600]  Government has become too big. It's overtaxing, overspending. We need to change direction.
[17:08.600 --> 17:12.600]  We really need change. You can't afford to make the same mistakes we've made in the past.
[17:12.600 --> 17:14.600]  Mitt Romney's reputation as a flip-flopper.
[17:14.600 --> 17:17.600]  He went the other way when he got paid to go the other way.
[17:17.600 --> 17:19.600]  There is need for economic stimulus.
[17:19.600 --> 17:21.600]  It's about serial hypocrisy.
[17:21.600 --> 17:26.600]  This election is about trust. There's been one true consistent candidate, and that's Dr. Ron Paul.
[17:26.600 --> 17:29.600]  Ron Paul has been so consistent from the very beginning.
[17:29.600 --> 17:31.600]  He seems like a more honest candidate.
[17:31.600 --> 17:34.600]  He tells the truth about what he believes, whether you like it or not.
[17:34.600 --> 17:39.600]  He's never once voted for a tax increase, never once voted for an unbalanced budget.
[17:39.600 --> 17:43.600]  Ron Paul's plan is bold. Cutting five departments is what we need.
[17:43.600 --> 17:47.600]  When he says he's going to cut a trillion dollars in the first year, I believe it.
[17:47.600 --> 17:52.600]  If you don't like how things are going, if you're tired of politicians, he's something different.
[17:52.600 --> 17:54.600]  Ron Paul. Ron Paul. Ron Paul.
[17:54.600 --> 17:57.600]  Ron Paul is the one we've been looking for.
[17:57.600 --> 18:00.600]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:00.600 --> 18:05.600]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.600 --> 18:09.600]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[18:09.600 --> 18:14.600]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.600 --> 18:20.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.600 --> 18:24.600]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.600 --> 18:26.600]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.600 --> 18:28.600]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:28.600 --> 18:33.600]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.600 --> 18:38.600]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.600 --> 18:40.600]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.600 --> 18:46.600]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner,
[18:46.600 --> 18:50.600]  or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.600 --> 18:57.600]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.600 --> 19:00.600]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.600 --> 19:26.600]  Music playing.
[19:26.600 --> 19:55.000]  Alright, we are back. This is Rule of All Radio. We have a couple of callers up on
[19:55.000 --> 20:02.840]  the board, Woody and Joe. Folks, again, the call in number is 512-646-1984. Like I said,
[20:02.840 --> 20:07.280]  we need to get involved. That means if you don't agree with what I'm saying, call in
[20:07.280 --> 20:12.160]  and tell me about it. I don't have a problem being wrong or being told I'm wrong. I ain't
[20:12.160 --> 20:18.640]  going to listen to this still. I honestly believe we do need to be in this, but we really do.
[20:18.640 --> 20:25.440]  We really need you folks that are listeners to start doing more than just listen. It's
[20:25.440 --> 20:29.680]  great that you're taking the information and applying it where you are if you are. That's
[20:29.680 --> 20:36.680]  wonderful. Tell more people about the show. Get them listening. That's wonderful. Send
[20:36.680 --> 20:44.160]  us donations, win them where you can to help us keep going. That's wonderful. But eventually,
[20:44.160 --> 20:48.480]  this dog's going to come live out on your doorstep, and you're going to have to take
[20:48.480 --> 20:54.840]  this information and do the fight yourself, and that's when you're going to start looking
[20:54.840 --> 21:00.960]  for this class. I would rather that you be well-educated and well-informed before it
[21:00.960 --> 21:06.680]  ever gets rolling downhill so that you know how to deal with it from the very beginning,
[21:06.680 --> 21:11.120]  not after you've already made more mistakes than you can count at the first meeting in
[21:11.120 --> 21:20.040]  court. So folks, learn before there's a problem how to deal with it, not after it hit a major
[21:20.040 --> 21:21.040]  crisis point.
[21:21.040 --> 21:26.880]  All right. Let's start taking your calls. We're going to go to Woody in Texas. Woody,
[21:26.880 --> 21:27.880]  what can we do for you?
[21:27.880 --> 21:31.760]  Well, good evening, Eddie, and good afternoon, Deborah. First of all, Eddie, I want to pop
[21:31.760 --> 21:38.960]  you up a little bit. You guys have a fabulous job. I just want to say, man, your knowledge,
[21:38.960 --> 21:43.800]  your service, and your dedication to all this, and of course, Deborah and Randy also, I just
[21:43.800 --> 21:48.480]  want to let you know on the bottom of my heart, you guys are appreciated. It may not seem
[21:48.480 --> 21:53.080]  that way at times. You may have heard your, I believe, last week kind of saying, you've
[21:53.080 --> 21:56.960]  changed, kind of changed your heart a little bit, not that you're going to do anything
[21:56.960 --> 22:01.600]  about it, but it does get very troublesome sometimes when you think you're not making
[22:01.600 --> 22:07.720]  much headway. But from my standpoint, and I can assure you from others that I just top
[22:07.720 --> 22:12.160]  of my head off to you. So I'll get started here if you don't mind. Again, thank you again.
[22:12.160 --> 22:19.440]  Eddie, basically about November of 2010, the red light of traffic enforcement captured
[22:19.440 --> 22:26.720]  my conveyance. And of course, I did not react to that whatsoever. I ended up selling that
[22:26.720 --> 22:30.720]  conveyance about a year and two months later. Don't have the exact figures here. It doesn't
[22:30.720 --> 22:38.120]  really matter. As of this date today, I get a letter from attorneys in San Antonio, Texas.
[22:38.120 --> 22:44.280]  Basically, the letter says that it's a notice of unpaid civil penalties. And there's really
[22:44.280 --> 22:49.800]  no teeth to it, Eddie, but it does concern me. I think that I'm going to send a cease
[22:49.800 --> 22:54.440]  and desist letter, and that's the only thing I can think to do. Again, I do not own the
[22:54.440 --> 23:00.120]  conveyance anymore. Of course, I own the conveyance at the time of the alleged violation,
[23:00.120 --> 23:05.480]  but this is total tyranny. And if I could add to this, about six months ago, they're
[23:05.480 --> 23:11.800]  actually taking people in... I'm not sure if it's... I think it was Gallup New Mexico
[23:11.800 --> 23:16.320]  or Las Cruces New Mexico. I apologize for not knowing the exact state and town, but they're
[23:16.320 --> 23:20.400]  actually telling people that if they got these unpaid tickets, they're shutting down the
[23:20.400 --> 23:24.880]  utilities to their homes. That's been on the internet and on the news. I mean, this is
[23:24.880 --> 23:30.120]  starting to be very tyrannical. So again, what do you think about my sending them a
[23:30.120 --> 23:37.040]  desist and desist letter? Oh, just let the whole thing just disappear.
[23:37.040 --> 23:43.040]  I like the desist letter idea better. Well, where did the actual offense take place? Was
[23:43.040 --> 23:48.640]  it in San Antonio? No, sir. This actually took place in Tarrant
[23:48.640 --> 23:56.280]  County, Fort Worth. Okay. And here's the situation. Go ahead. You need to find out who runs the
[23:56.280 --> 24:01.400]  cameras in Tarrant County. I'll almost guarantee you it's not a Texas-based company. It's an
[24:01.400 --> 24:08.280]  Arizona-based company. They're out of Cincinnati, Ohio. Okay. Or the Ohio-based one. So. And
[24:08.280 --> 24:15.320]  of course... Okay, go ahead, Ed. The argument does not change, though, regardless. Correct.
[24:15.320 --> 24:24.400]  But this is the civil penalties that they've got. Okay? They're not civil. They are a bill
[24:24.400 --> 24:32.960]  of pains and penalties is what they are. They're a legislatively predetermination of guilt
[24:32.960 --> 24:39.720]  without any real judicial review. How do we know there's no judicial review? Because you
[24:39.720 --> 24:48.640]  only go before the administrative judge in the municipal court, and you have no course
[24:48.640 --> 24:59.000]  of appeal. Correct. So you would have the ability to appeal if it were anything else,
[24:59.000 --> 25:09.440]  civil or criminal. So that's our first indicator that this is an administrative ticket. So
[25:09.440 --> 25:15.640]  what is the definition of a bill of attainder or a bill of pains and penalties? An administrative
[25:15.640 --> 25:24.080]  or legislative determination of guilt without judicial review. Plus, we also have the same
[25:24.080 --> 25:34.120]  point up that still transportation offense, and we're not in it. Correct. 100%. Okay.
[25:34.120 --> 25:41.600]  So given that the cease and desist is fine, but I would make sure and assert the point
[25:41.600 --> 25:48.960]  in that letter that either cough up your evidence that I was actively engaging in transportation
[25:48.960 --> 25:54.680]  at or engaged in transportation at the time of the offense, or you are hereby ordered
[25:54.680 --> 26:04.240]  to cease and desist, and so on and so forth. Even in the traffic courts, they never prove
[26:04.240 --> 26:09.240]  standing because they never prove transportation. They let you prove it for them by not objecting
[26:09.240 --> 26:17.080]  to it. From your knowledge and viewpoint, and I hope this is right, it seems like they
[26:17.080 --> 26:24.440]  are not allowed to put this on someone's credit report. Is that your understanding? I don't
[26:24.440 --> 26:29.080]  know. I haven't read through it that far. I don't know what they're allowed to do with
[26:29.080 --> 26:35.120]  the information if it remains unpaid. Okay. Okay. I did a little bit of research. I don't
[26:35.120 --> 26:40.200]  know how trustworthy it could be, but it seems like they're violating some type of, gosh,
[26:40.200 --> 26:48.320]  I'm losing my mind on the correct terminology of the Fair Debt and Credit Act. Fair Debt
[26:48.320 --> 26:52.480]  election practices. Yes, sir. I believe that, in other words, it's something that they
[26:52.480 --> 26:57.280]  can't just throw on your credit report. Well, that's what I'm saying. If this is an out-of-state
[26:57.280 --> 27:01.960]  company, then this attorney's firm is acting as a third-party debt collector. That's what
[27:01.960 --> 27:06.920]  they're saying, and they're letting it correct. Does the letter say this is an attempt to
[27:06.920 --> 27:13.560]  collect a debt? It refers to our firm by its contractor for collection. No, sir, it really
[27:13.560 --> 27:18.040]  doesn't say anything other than clipping off a bottom portion with all the information
[27:18.040 --> 27:24.080]  to pay it by money-ordered online or by phone. Yeah, trust me, these attorneys have no ability
[27:24.080 --> 27:28.360]  to collect that without being third-party debt collectors. Correct. I sure wish I'd
[27:28.360 --> 27:32.880]  know somebody there violating the law, because this just sounds so... What is tyranny? If
[27:32.880 --> 27:36.200]  this is just crazy, why couldn't I do something like this? Well, wait a minute. Is this for
[27:36.200 --> 27:40.080]  red light camera stuff, Woody? Is that what you're saying? Yes, yes, Deborah. Eddie, do
[27:40.080 --> 27:47.600]  you know if it says in the statute where the state is authorized to assign or contract
[27:47.600 --> 27:53.920]  out for collections on these things? Because this is what I was... The state would not
[27:53.920 --> 27:58.840]  be because the state does not own the cameras. The state has nothing to do with them. It's
[27:58.840 --> 28:06.160]  the municipality. It's the municipality that does the contracting with the red light camera
[28:06.160 --> 28:12.440]  company. Well, what I'm asking is, is there anything in state statute that would authorize
[28:12.440 --> 28:20.280]  the municipality then to contract out for collections on these red light cameras? They
[28:20.280 --> 28:25.180]  did that when they got the camera contract. Okay. Their collection comes from the red
[28:25.180 --> 28:31.000]  light camera company. Basically, all money goes to the red light camera company first.
[28:31.000 --> 28:37.960]  Well, if... They then throw out money to the city. Well, then if the municipality is statutorily
[28:37.960 --> 28:45.200]  authorized to farm out the whole red light camera business altogether, if they are authorized
[28:45.200 --> 28:51.360]  to do that under state statute, then the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act does not apply
[28:51.360 --> 28:56.160]  and you wouldn't be able to use that in this situation. This is what Mike Meares was talking
[28:56.160 --> 29:03.080]  about the last time we had him on the show. If there is statutory authority for collections,
[29:03.080 --> 29:12.800]  billing, anything of that regard regarding something of fines or fees incurred by a government
[29:12.800 --> 29:23.640]  infraction, then you can't... Then they are exempt and immune from the Fair Debt Collections
[29:23.640 --> 29:29.080]  Practices Act. But see, that's what I'm saying. I don't know that the authority is granted
[29:29.080 --> 29:35.400]  through statute to the municipality. Okay. Well, if it's not contracted with a service
[29:35.400 --> 29:42.560]  provider, it's the service provider. Okay. Well, if the municipality is not authorized
[29:42.560 --> 29:48.680]  under statute to contract with another company for the red light cameras, then yes, you could
[29:48.680 --> 29:53.680]  use the DCPA, but that's something that we have to chase down in statute first to know
[29:53.680 --> 30:00.680]  whether for sure we could do that or not. All right, we'll be right back, folks.
[30:23.680 --> 30:30.680]  We'll be right back.
[30:53.680 --> 31:00.680]  We'll be right back.
[31:23.680 --> 31:30.680]  We'll be right back.
[31:53.680 --> 32:22.680]  Yeah, I got the warrant. And I'm going to solve them to the end of the month then.
[32:22.680 --> 32:43.680]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[32:43.680 --> 32:48.840]  Woody, you dropped off the line there. I'm not sure if we were done with you or not.
[32:48.840 --> 32:55.520]  But just an FYI, one of the suggestions I'm making here is that it's possible that the
[32:55.520 --> 33:02.440]  FDCA could still be made to apply. We'd have to research this out and make sure because
[33:02.440 --> 33:10.520]  no matter who's attempting to do the collection, the attempt is illegal. The red light camera
[33:10.520 --> 33:20.480]  still only applies to those engaging in transportation and the camera by design cannot distinguish
[33:20.480 --> 33:29.120]  between those who are and those who aren't, thus resulting in a fraudulent ticket. If
[33:29.120 --> 33:40.120]  the company is fraudulently trying to collect a transportation ticket against a non-transportation
[33:40.120 --> 33:49.440]  party, the FDCA may not protect them because their entire course of action is based on
[33:49.440 --> 34:00.440]  fraud. And they are fraudulently trying to collect on the fraudulent debt. That's a legal
[34:00.440 --> 34:07.320]  argument and it's one we need to put forth and get case law precedent set on. But right
[34:07.320 --> 34:14.600]  now, that would make sense to me. You're not in transportation. The vendor that sold the
[34:14.600 --> 34:23.120]  camera knew that the camera could not identify who was and who wasn't when they sold the
[34:23.120 --> 34:34.720]  contract to the city. Get my point? So they colluded with the city to defraud non-transportation
[34:34.720 --> 34:45.160]  citizens with these tickets. That's the argument I'm going to make over it. So be that as it
[34:45.160 --> 34:51.200]  may, I'd research that out and see if we can make that fly and stick to the wall. Anyway,
[34:51.200 --> 34:56.320]  we're going to take our next caller who is Joe in Texas. Joe, what can we do for you?
[34:56.320 --> 35:00.160]  Thank you, Eddie. I want to thank you, Brianna, my daughter attended one of your classes and
[35:00.160 --> 35:09.000]  she won that ticket. Good. I got a ticket Sunday. I just wanted to let you know up front
[35:09.000 --> 35:16.800]  the ticket. The violation A was failure to display driver license. Reason for stop was
[35:16.800 --> 35:24.680]  failure to stop at a distant point. And then the officer who wrote me the ticket was not
[35:24.680 --> 35:32.560]  the officer that stopped me, but there were two officers. And I did sign the ticket and
[35:32.560 --> 35:37.840]  I scratched the court date and I put my name. One of the two officers together in the same
[35:37.840 --> 35:42.760]  car? Well, the first officer, the one that stopped me, that's the one I didn't display
[35:42.760 --> 35:48.760]  my license, the officer, the second officer came back. And so then they started collaborating,
[35:48.760 --> 35:57.080]  but at the end, he's the one that wrote me the ticket. But then, like I said, the second
[35:57.080 --> 36:05.240]  officer was or was not present when the alleged offense he wrote the ticket for was committed.
[36:05.240 --> 36:13.040]  Yeah, was not present. Okay. He's got a problem. And then I scratched the part about the appearance
[36:13.040 --> 36:19.000]  and then I put my initials and I signed the ticket now without prejudice. So because I've
[36:19.000 --> 36:25.880]  been hearing you for a while, you know, that's what I did. And what happened is the violation
[36:25.880 --> 36:31.960]  that he told me that I didn't stop at a distant point I did. When he pulled me over, he said,
[36:31.960 --> 36:36.400]  I think I saw you run a red light and said, what do you mean you think? And then as well,
[36:36.400 --> 36:40.600]  I saw you run the light. I said, no, I didn't run a light. I stopped and took off. And it's
[36:40.600 --> 36:46.760]  a pedestrian walkway, which means they passed. And then you can continue. So we verbalized
[36:46.760 --> 36:51.120]  he asked for my license and I said, well, I'm not going to show it to you. And stated
[36:51.120 --> 36:57.120]  that to him and he didn't say anything. And then he started talking about that I had run
[36:57.120 --> 37:02.040]  the red light. Well, I can show you my identification. But if I show you my license, that means
[37:02.040 --> 37:08.040]  I think I heard something in reference to getting arrested or something like that. So
[37:08.040 --> 37:14.120]  he said, well, get off the car and he handcuffed me. He didn't send me under arrest. So he
[37:14.120 --> 37:19.400]  took me to the back and the second officer showed up. And then both of them started talking
[37:19.400 --> 37:25.080]  to me about this is what's going to happen, Joe. He says, we don't have time. This is
[37:25.080 --> 37:31.720]  a busy night tonight and we don't have time, you know, and that we need to see your license.
[37:31.720 --> 37:36.560]  And he started talking about the law, both of them. And I said, well, I have my opinion.
[37:36.560 --> 37:40.600]  And then they said, what about if you're wrong? Well, that's not the issue here. You know,
[37:40.600 --> 37:44.520]  the issue is that, you know, you're, you're entitled to pay and I'm entitled to legal
[37:44.520 --> 37:50.280]  advice. And he said, well, I can arrest you. That's up to you, officer. That's your job.
[37:50.280 --> 37:54.960]  So he said, well, okay, he put me in the back of the car and handcuffed me. I was already
[37:54.960 --> 38:02.960]  handcuffed from his handcuffs and and then both of the officers, they didn't, he didn't
[38:02.960 --> 38:08.000]  say I'm under arrest or anything or read my rights. So I was back in the car for 10 minutes.
[38:08.000 --> 38:12.400]  They started talking. I could see them talking to each other. Then they came back and said,
[38:12.400 --> 38:17.280]  Mr. Contello, get out of the car. I came out of the car. And it said, listen, me and Mr.
[38:17.280 --> 38:23.080]  Haynes saw the video and we saw you run a red light. And I said, well, what do you mean
[38:23.080 --> 38:28.600]  you saw the video? Yeah, we saw the video and you ran the red line. I said, officer,
[38:28.600 --> 38:32.080]  that's not due process. How can you tell me that you saw the red light and I haven't seen
[38:32.080 --> 38:38.080]  the video. I'm sorry, the video. And then he continues talking about, you know, the
[38:38.080 --> 38:42.360]  law of this, if you're going to do this, we're going to take you to jail. I said, that's
[38:42.360 --> 38:48.080]  fine. That's your job. Okay, but you're giving me opinions about what's going to happen.
[38:48.080 --> 38:53.920]  And I have my rights and they continued and then and trying to persuade me. And then they
[38:53.920 --> 38:57.800]  say, well, what that means, I'm going to have to arrest you. Will you do what you have to
[38:57.800 --> 39:04.840]  do? So the other officer, the second officer pulled me to the front, come to the front
[39:04.840 --> 39:09.720]  and with a camera on there. And he told the officer, well, take off his handcuffs and
[39:09.720 --> 39:15.160]  put your handcuffs on me. So they switched handcuffs. But the officer that had me and
[39:15.160 --> 39:21.800]  the second officer pulled my wallet out of my, you know, out of my, my pants. And he
[39:21.800 --> 39:26.520]  started going through the wallet. He said, oh, here's he counted the money first. And
[39:26.520 --> 39:31.600]  then he took out my, oh, here's his license and the officer took it and then took out
[39:31.600 --> 39:36.320]  my social security card and he took out my ID card. He says, what is this? I said, well,
[39:36.320 --> 39:41.800]  that's a card I ran for city council in 2009 as a picture. He said, well, you ran for council.
[39:41.800 --> 39:46.280]  You don't know the law. And then he went into the social security card. What was I carrying
[39:46.280 --> 39:51.600]  a social security for my car for? And I said, well, you know, I carry it. And they stated,
[39:51.600 --> 39:56.200]  well, don't you know they steal your wallet? They can use it with us. You know, I mean,
[39:56.200 --> 39:59.960]  no, are you kidding me? What you're telling me of this? And then they took me to the back
[39:59.960 --> 40:04.360]  and then he didn't say again, he didn't say you're under arrest. No, right. He put me
[40:04.360 --> 40:11.040]  back in the car. And then they came up and I saw him there talking again. And then the
[40:11.040 --> 40:15.600]  second officer comes to the car and he starts writing on the tickets. I said, Mr. Contero,
[40:15.600 --> 40:19.400]  you're the most stubbornest man. He said, I'm going to write this ticket out and I'm
[40:19.400 --> 40:23.880]  going to ask, are you going to sign the ticket? And I said, wait, what do you mean? He says,
[40:23.880 --> 40:27.200]  well, are you going to sign the ticket? I said, well, I'll sign the ticket, but I would,
[40:27.200 --> 40:31.680]  you know, I put the information like I said, scratch off that. So they came back out again
[40:31.680 --> 40:36.920]  and took me out of the car again. And the officer number one said, the one that stopped
[40:36.920 --> 40:41.560]  me, said, Mr. Contero, you want to go to jail or you want to go home? And I said, definitely,
[40:41.560 --> 40:45.880]  well, I like to go home. And that's when I signed the ticket and scratched off that
[40:45.880 --> 40:50.440]  information, you know, the date and appearance, right?
[40:50.440 --> 40:56.200]  You mean you scratched off the part about promising to make a plea, you mean?
[40:56.200 --> 40:59.360]  Yeah, no, the guilt, yes. Okay.
[40:59.360 --> 41:02.200]  And then initial that. I think I heard y'all say that.
[41:02.200 --> 41:07.080]  Yeah, it's okay to promise to appear. That's what the signature is supposed to be for,
[41:07.080 --> 41:12.200]  but now they've started putting on their promise to appear and make a plea. There's nothing
[41:12.200 --> 41:15.760]  in statute that requires you to make a plea at any point in time ever. So that's what
[41:15.760 --> 41:21.760]  you scratch off. But even the thing is, even if you did agree to that, even if it wasn't
[41:21.760 --> 41:27.800]  scratched off, they still can't hold you to that because there's still nothing in statute
[41:27.800 --> 41:33.760]  that requires you to make a plea, even if you signed saying that you would do it. I mean,
[41:33.760 --> 41:40.200]  that's just basically would be a contract that you made with them. And if you failed
[41:40.200 --> 41:44.600]  to make a plea and basically reneged on your end of the contract, well, then they really
[41:44.600 --> 41:50.040]  would have no recourse against you for not making a plea other than to sue you in civil
[41:50.040 --> 41:56.120]  court for breach of contract. And they're not going to do that. So even if you did not
[41:56.120 --> 42:00.120]  scratch that part off, they still can't hold you to it, like I said, unless they sued you
[42:00.120 --> 42:04.080]  in civil court for breach of contract. But it is a good idea to cross it all.
[42:04.080 --> 42:11.600]  Okay. So even though they wrote the wrong address on top of that as well, you know,
[42:11.600 --> 42:16.520]  they wrote the wrong address. That's going to be so they can misdirect the paperwork
[42:16.520 --> 42:23.120]  and compound other charges against you. And this makes sure that when you start filing
[42:23.120 --> 42:29.760]  your paperwork in court on a ticket that it contains your correct address. Okay. And what
[42:29.760 --> 42:34.320]  about the license failure to display? That's the violation eight. That's the one. The other
[42:34.320 --> 42:40.360]  one is reason, that was just a reason for stop. But he told me at the end. Nothing changes
[42:40.360 --> 42:45.680]  in the defense. Transportation offense is a transportation offense. The defense for
[42:45.680 --> 42:52.040]  it, or I'm sorry, transportation offense is the same no matter what. And the defense
[42:52.040 --> 43:00.040]  for them is the same, no matter what. And they state can never prove you were engaging
[43:00.040 --> 43:05.960]  in transportation. They never prove it because they never attempt to gather any evidence
[43:05.960 --> 43:12.360]  of it at the time of the stop. And so this officer that wrote me the ticket was not the
[43:12.360 --> 43:17.360]  one that stopped me. That's going to be something. I guess I'm going to attend your class to
[43:17.360 --> 43:24.000]  find out more information about that. Well, that would be good. But his authority to arrest
[43:24.000 --> 43:29.480]  issue that citation is limited only to offenses that are committed in his presence of view.
[43:29.480 --> 43:36.160]  If he wrote a citation illegally detain you when he had no authority to do that, that's
[43:36.160 --> 43:43.000]  false and prism. So yeah, just come to the class on Sunday. It's from two to five down
[43:43.000 --> 43:48.600]  at brave new books. And what about the best Joe? Hang on. If you got more, we'll take
[43:48.600 --> 43:53.080]  it away. Celebrate. Okay. All right, folks, this is rule of law radio. The calling number
[43:53.080 --> 44:01.240]  is 512-646-984. Joe's our last caller. Get in line. We'll be right back. Are you the
[44:01.240 --> 44:07.240]  plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.240 --> 44:13.480]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:13.480 --> 44:19.480]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[44:19.480 --> 44:24.400]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[44:24.400 --> 44:31.480]  by step course. And now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[44:31.480 --> 44:36.920]  years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[44:36.920 --> 44:43.240]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.240 --> 44:49.600]  We'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.600 --> 44:56.120]  prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.120 --> 45:05.680]  or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless
[45:05.680 --> 45:10.760]  readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try
[45:10.760 --> 45:16.320]  to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning
[45:16.320 --> 45:23.360]  of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful
[45:23.360 --> 45:29.720]  and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult
[45:29.720 --> 45:35.440]  and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches
[45:35.440 --> 45:41.060]  of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give
[45:41.060 --> 45:46.480]  you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study
[45:46.480 --> 45:56.720]  Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at
[45:56.720 --> 46:14.160]  freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[46:14.160 --> 46:39.400]  All right folks, we are back. This is Rudolf Law Radio. This is a Monday Night Traffic
[46:39.400 --> 46:46.280]  Show and we are still talking to Joe in Texas. Okay, Joe, one thing I need to ask you, did
[46:46.280 --> 46:51.480]  you ever inform the officers that you were not engaging in transportation and that's
[46:51.480 --> 46:59.520]  why you would not produce your license? Yes, sir. Okay. Now, second question. Go ahead.
[46:59.520 --> 47:09.080]  Did you record everything? No, I didn't. That's not good. The first thing you need to be doing
[47:09.080 --> 47:12.960]  then along with the other paperwork that we filed before first appearance is filing a motion
[47:12.960 --> 47:20.600]  for discovery to get your hands on this alleged video. Okay. You also want all information
[47:20.600 --> 47:25.680]  from the officer's body microphones so that we can listen to what they were sitting there
[47:25.680 --> 47:31.680]  formulating as a course of action while they were trying to collaborate on how to frame
[47:31.680 --> 47:37.880]  you. Okay. How about the fact that they said they were going to arrest me twice and then
[47:37.880 --> 47:45.960]  they read my rights or nothing twice? Again, the court is going to say that doesn't matter.
[47:45.960 --> 47:52.280]  We're going to document it and say that it does matter, but it's not an argument we're
[47:52.280 --> 47:56.160]  going to make in court. We're going to make a list of standing objections and we're going
[47:56.160 --> 48:01.160]  to file paperwork regarding those objections and we're going to stick with that, but the
[48:01.160 --> 48:11.600]  defense does not change. Okay. Okay. Then I'll probably see you Sunday. Are you going to
[48:11.600 --> 48:20.320]  be there Sunday? Yeah. Now, folks, Sunday is Father's Day, but we are having a class anyway.
[48:20.320 --> 48:27.880]  I will always have a class every Sunday unless the bookstore is closed or for some reason
[48:27.880 --> 48:33.920]  I myself must be out of town. Otherwise, I'm going to be there and I will pray that you
[48:33.920 --> 48:39.680]  will all be there whether you have an issue or not so that we're getting prepared for
[48:39.680 --> 48:44.680]  when something like what Joe's going through right now happens. It's better to know what
[48:44.680 --> 48:51.800]  to do before this occurs than try to learn it after the fact. Trust me on this. Okay.
[48:51.800 --> 48:58.240]  And based upon what you did, Joe, you do a lot about what to do and what not to do before
[48:58.240 --> 49:02.560]  this ever started. Even though you hadn't been to a class, you've listened to the show.
[49:02.560 --> 49:11.640]  Okay. But the class will do you a much better world of good because we spend a lot of time
[49:11.640 --> 49:16.760]  going right through the particular statutes that you're having to contend with. Okay.
[49:16.760 --> 49:22.160]  Well, I'll probably bring my daughter, Brianna, too, also so she can kind of elaborate also
[49:22.160 --> 49:29.560]  more. Okay. Now, FYI, next Sunday is all going to be court procedure. We're going to
[49:29.560 --> 49:35.880]  be running mock court next weekend. So if you've got an issue, that's the place to figure
[49:35.880 --> 49:40.960]  out how to deal with it in front of the judge. Okay. This coming Sunday. All right. This
[49:40.960 --> 49:47.960]  coming Sunday. Okay. Okay. Talk to you later. All right, Joe. Thanks for calling in. Bye.
[49:47.960 --> 49:53.720]  Bye-bye. All right. We have one other caller, Michael in Maine. Folks, come on, get in line.
[49:53.720 --> 49:58.120]  We got about an hour, a little over an hour left in the show. Don't leave us hanging
[49:58.120 --> 50:02.920]  here. I've got to go back to ranting and we all know how that turns out. All right, Michael,
[50:02.920 --> 50:07.000]  what can we do for you? Hi, how are you? How are you?
[50:07.000 --> 50:16.880]  Not so far so good. I got a ticket for no seatbelt. Okay. And they wanted me to give
[50:16.880 --> 50:25.800]  me a $70 fine. They pulled me over and I had a seatbelt on when he finally pulled me over.
[50:25.800 --> 50:31.840]  Well, I saw him down the road. He was pulling other people down, right? Before he did, I
[50:31.840 --> 50:37.200]  put my seatbelt on. By the time I got up to him, he pulled me over. He said, well, you
[50:37.200 --> 50:42.240]  must have just put it on. I said, how do you know? Apparently, they had a spotter down
[50:42.240 --> 50:49.760]  the road, right? And radioed ahead. But this particular one doesn't have a seatbelt on,
[50:49.760 --> 50:55.800]  whatever. They just pulled me over without a seatbelt. I told them I said I wasn't in
[50:55.800 --> 51:07.000]  commerce at the time because I'm not operating in commerce. And he wouldn't buy that. Anyway,
[51:07.000 --> 51:16.200]  he ended up giving me a ticket. And now I can either pay the fine or I can contest it.
[51:16.200 --> 51:23.120]  But if I contest it, I don't get to go to a regular court. I don't get to have a
[51:23.120 --> 51:33.640]  trial. Basically, you're going to go before a magistrate to the administrative thing.
[51:33.640 --> 51:35.200]  And there's no appeal.
[51:35.200 --> 51:41.400]  Okay. And the first thing you do is object to all non-judicial decision-making.
[51:41.400 --> 51:47.040]  How would I do that?
[51:47.040 --> 51:53.040]  You filed documents in that alleged administrative court stating that I do not agree.
[51:53.040 --> 52:01.000]  Or abide by any non-judicial decision-making in this case. Again, there are three areas
[52:01.000 --> 52:09.520]  of law these people can operate in legally, okay? Criminal law, civil law, administrative
[52:09.520 --> 52:19.560]  law. Administrative law never, ever has anything to do with the public. It can't. We don't
[52:19.560 --> 52:25.560]  work for the corporation to be a part of its administrative procedures to be required to
[52:25.560 --> 52:32.880]  abide by its administrative rules. It's like McDonald's corporate policy suddenly becoming
[52:32.880 --> 52:41.080]  the law of the lenient. And you don't work for McDonald's, okay?
[52:41.080 --> 52:49.440]  So administrative law doesn't apply to us. If they're going to charge you with something,
[52:49.440 --> 52:55.680]  then it can't be through administrative or legislative means that they determine guilt
[52:55.680 --> 53:05.440]  and liability that specifically outlawed as a bill of pains and penalties. They're forbidden.
[53:05.440 --> 53:10.240]  Just like I gave the definition earlier, a bill of attainder. Look it up. Black's Law
[53:10.240 --> 53:20.640]  6 edition. Look it up in Bouvié's 1856. A bill of attainder is a determination, an administrative
[53:20.640 --> 53:30.920]  or legislative determination of guilt without judicial review, okay? So if they're taking
[53:30.920 --> 53:38.000]  you through an administrative procedure and finding you guilty, the whole process violates
[53:38.000 --> 53:46.200]  the bill of attainder portion because it was an administrative determination of guilt or
[53:46.200 --> 53:54.080]  innocence without any judicial review. The administrative officer sitting there can't
[53:54.080 --> 54:02.160]  be acting as both an administrative officer and a judicial officer at the same time. They're
[54:02.160 --> 54:21.680]  all in water. So we object to any non-judicial decision making, period. An administrative,
[54:21.680 --> 54:30.400]  quote unquote, judge does not have any immunity for their acts. Their acts are ministerial.
[54:30.400 --> 54:37.880]  So if they insist on prosecuting you through this, sue them because you did not agree to
[54:37.880 --> 54:49.440]  any non-judicial decision making. Okay. Because he also told me I had to sign this thing and
[54:49.440 --> 54:58.080]  otherwise it was an arrestable offense. Well, how can an administrative offense be arrestable?
[54:58.080 --> 55:02.480]  I don't know. He said if I didn't sign it, it would be arrestable. Well, the problem
[55:02.480 --> 55:09.160]  there is does the offense, is the offense listed in the administrative rules or is it listed
[55:09.160 --> 55:17.840]  in your state penal code? I don't know. Well, then you're behind the eight ball and not
[55:17.840 --> 55:27.840]  knowing what you need to know because you need to know. Well, I don't know. Well, grab
[55:27.840 --> 55:33.880]  some books and start reading so you do. If you don't do it, if I don't send us in within
[55:33.880 --> 55:41.560]  20 days, they can pull my license and there'll be extra fees to reinstate it and everything
[55:41.560 --> 55:52.800]  else. Okay. So again, what are you going to do? Let them railroad you or are you going
[55:52.800 --> 55:59.240]  to fight back? Well, I want to fight back but I want to go to a court. I want to go to
[55:59.240 --> 56:05.200]  a real court. You probably have to go through the administrative phase first and then you
[56:05.200 --> 56:13.240]  can take it into court. That's what happens a lot of time with these situations. You need
[56:13.240 --> 56:19.400]  to look up the statute on what governs this particular type of offense and what the procedure
[56:19.400 --> 56:30.000]  is. Yeah. Well, for that particular violation, which would be 20 days, whatever they get
[56:30.000 --> 56:37.000]  back down. I'll have to look it up. Yes, you will because right now you're presuming what
[56:37.000 --> 56:43.760]  it means rather than know because you haven't read it. So don't do that either. Read it
[56:43.760 --> 56:52.760]  so you know. All right. All right. But if this is administrative just object to any
[56:52.760 --> 57:04.520]  administrative proceedings at all, I want judicial. Correct. I do not agree to any nonjudicial
[57:04.520 --> 57:15.960]  decision making. If their process is all administrative, they can't get it to a judicial. Okay. All
[57:15.960 --> 57:22.960]  right. Okay. All right. Let's do a little research. Thank you, Eddie. You're welcome.
[57:22.960 --> 57:30.240]  Okay. Bye bye. All right, folks. That was our last caller. Now, I guess what that means.
[57:30.240 --> 57:33.960]  You got to listen to me all over again. If you're not going to call in, call in number
[57:33.960 --> 57:45.040]  is 512-646-1984. Okay. Like I said, we have to work together on this. If we don't work
[57:45.040 --> 57:50.680]  together and help each other out, then we're in there alone. If we're in there alone, we're
[57:50.680 --> 57:58.960]  an easy target. Okay. Let's do what the pioneers did. Get together. Support each other. Help
[57:58.960 --> 58:10.800]  out. Go to court. Be a witness. Do affidavits. Let's collectively change our world. Okay.
[58:10.800 --> 58:15.760]  Nobody's going to do it, but us, the powers that be don't want to change. They like it.
[58:15.760 --> 58:27.200]  It's making them money, but they're stealing it from us. Let's make that stop. Okay, folks.
[58:27.200 --> 58:31.880]  This is Google Ball Radio. I'm your host, Eddie Craig. David Stevens, Randy Kelton, Monday
[58:31.880 --> 58:50.640]  Night Traffic Show. We will be right back after this break.
[58:50.640 --> 58:55.320]  The Oklahoma City bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story. Reason number
[58:55.320 --> 59:00.320]  one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices. On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the
[59:00.320 --> 59:04.960]  witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other
[59:04.960 --> 59:10.800]  perpetrators. The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the
[59:10.800 --> 59:15.800]  Ryder truck bomb to the Murr Building and detonated it. The only witness the government produced
[59:15.800 --> 59:20.440]  to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one
[59:20.440 --> 59:25.080]  of her legs in the bombing, testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful
[59:25.080 --> 59:30.240]  John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck. While at least 15 other witnesses claimed
[59:30.240 --> 59:36.440]  to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses
[59:36.440 --> 59:41.040]  placed him with other men in the days before the bombing, including when he rented the
[59:41.040 --> 59:46.440]  Ryder truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators. For more
[59:46.440 --> 01:00:15.840]  information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:00:16.560 --> 01:00:21.440]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:00:21.440 --> 01:00:27.040]  again, and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.040 --> 01:00:32.560]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:00:32.560 --> 01:00:38.320]  it's worth hanging onto. This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:45.840]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:51.000]  The biggest living organism on earth is a fun guy, not a fun guy, but a honey mushroom,
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:56.200]  armillaria ostae to be exact, and it's so big it's nicknamed the monster. This big
[01:00:56.200 --> 01:01:01.960]  boy started out as a microscopic spore 2,400 years ago, but now inhabits 2,000 acres of
[01:01:01.960 --> 01:01:07.200]  the Mahler National Forest in eastern Oregon. It stretches 3.5 miles and reaches depths
[01:01:07.200 --> 01:01:12.240]  of 3 feet. Though it murders trees in its path, it's a treat for mushroomers armed with
[01:01:12.240 --> 01:01:16.800]  knives and forks. Foragers and connoisseurs are wild about the earthy taste of honey
[01:01:16.800 --> 01:01:21.360]  mushrooms. I've even cooked a myself Russian style with onions and sour cream. They're
[01:01:21.360 --> 01:01:26.200]  great on pierogies, especially really big ones. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news
[01:01:26.200 --> 01:01:35.080]  and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. CPR just got a whole lot easier. New guidelines
[01:01:35.080 --> 01:01:39.880]  skip mouth to mouth and go right for the chest compressions. It's not only less yucky, it
[01:01:39.880 --> 01:01:44.280]  saves more lives. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with more on
[01:01:44.280 --> 01:01:46.840]  hands only CPR.
[01:01:46.840 --> 01:01:51.360]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:01:51.360 --> 01:01:57.160]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.160 --> 01:02:03.360]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:02:03.360 --> 01:02:08.440]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private
[01:02:08.440 --> 01:02:16.000]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with start page.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:21.080]  Being a hero just got a whole lot easier. CPR experts say mouth to mouth resuscitation
[01:02:21.080 --> 01:02:26.720]  is no longer needed. You can stick to just chest compressions. Hands only CPR is not
[01:02:26.720 --> 01:02:33.080]  only less personal, it's actually more effective, saving 62% more patients than the old method.
[01:02:33.080 --> 01:02:37.360]  That's because hands only CPR makes bystanders more likely to help rather than hesitate
[01:02:37.360 --> 01:02:41.960]  at the thought of mouth to mouth contact. As a former CPR instructor myself, I know
[01:02:41.960 --> 01:02:47.080]  that immediate continuous chest compressions are the key to saving lives, so this is especially
[01:02:47.080 --> 01:02:53.080]  good news. So get ready to be someone's hero. Learn more and find a CPR class at AmericanHeart.org.
[01:02:53.080 --> 01:03:10.080]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:10.080 --> 01:03:22.800]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We have another caller, Gary in Texas.
[01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:25.080]  Gary, what can we do for you?
[01:03:25.080 --> 01:03:30.160]  So Eddie, I've got two questions for you. I'm going to be real as quick as I can. I'd
[01:03:30.160 --> 01:03:35.000]  like to find out, I heard you speak one time about the powers of the Attorney General in
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:44.800]  Texas to prosecute criminal acts. Can you explain to me what those circumstances are?
[01:03:44.800 --> 01:03:50.720]  According to the Texas Constitution and the statute's granting prosecutorial authority
[01:03:50.720 --> 01:03:58.160]  to the Attorney General, the Constitution specifically grants him the power to act as
[01:03:58.160 --> 01:04:05.160]  an attorney for the state only in a civil capacity.
[01:04:05.160 --> 01:04:16.880]  He can only appear in the Supreme Court of Texas and he cannot prosecute a criminal case.
[01:04:16.880 --> 01:04:22.640]  He can advise on it, but he cannot prosecute it.
[01:04:22.640 --> 01:04:28.360]  Under those circumstances, can the Attorney General in Texas prosecute a criminal case?
[01:04:28.360 --> 01:04:30.960]  He can advise, but cannot prosecute it.
[01:04:30.960 --> 01:04:38.760]  No, that's what I just said. The county or district attorney is the only one given state
[01:04:38.760 --> 01:04:49.320]  criminal prosecutorial powers by the Constitution, specifically those offices and no other.
[01:04:49.320 --> 01:04:55.880]  So if a district attorney declines to prosecute, can they ask the district AG to go in and
[01:04:55.880 --> 01:04:56.880]  prosecute?
[01:04:56.880 --> 01:05:04.640]  No, no. He does not have that authority. The AG, the AG has the, mostly what the Attorney
[01:05:04.640 --> 01:05:11.520]  General does, is act as the defense attorney in civil matters against the state or against
[01:05:11.520 --> 01:05:17.920]  state actors. The only criminal matter that the Attorney General's office is authorized
[01:05:17.920 --> 01:05:22.720]  with that has to do with a collection of child support. That's it.
[01:05:22.720 --> 01:05:23.720]  Child support.
[01:05:23.720 --> 01:05:24.720]  Right.
[01:05:24.720 --> 01:05:31.240]  Okay. And where do I find that? Can you tell me where that's, again, that's a power the
[01:05:31.240 --> 01:05:36.440]  legislature tried to give them, and there is no authority for the legislature to do
[01:05:36.440 --> 01:05:43.120]  that, just like there wasn't for the legislature to give a city attorney state prosecutorial
[01:05:43.120 --> 01:05:44.120]  power.
[01:05:44.120 --> 01:05:48.040]  Yeah, but under statute, it says that, but it's not constitutional.
[01:05:48.040 --> 01:05:49.040]  Oh, right.
[01:05:49.040 --> 01:05:50.520]  Now I get it.
[01:05:50.520 --> 01:05:58.440]  But there is no statutory prosecutorial power designated or delegated to the Attorney General,
[01:05:58.440 --> 01:06:03.280]  other than child support, that's it. But as Eddie says, that doesn't even jive with the
[01:06:03.280 --> 01:06:07.920]  Constitution. All other criminal matters, according to statute and the Constitution,
[01:06:07.920 --> 01:06:10.960]  are strictly for the county or district attorney, period.
[01:06:10.960 --> 01:06:11.960]  The Texas Constitution.
[01:06:11.960 --> 01:06:12.960]  Right.
[01:06:12.960 --> 01:06:14.960]  Don't go spouting federal. Texas Constitution.
[01:06:14.960 --> 01:06:17.800]  No, no. I said, well, I didn't say federal Constitution.
[01:06:17.800 --> 01:06:18.800]  Right.
[01:06:18.800 --> 01:06:26.520]  But Article 5, Section 21, is where the prosecutorial power of the state is assigned, and it is
[01:06:26.520 --> 01:06:29.640]  assigned only to two officers.
[01:06:29.640 --> 01:06:31.840]  In criminal matters, that's it.
[01:06:31.840 --> 01:06:32.840]  Good.
[01:06:32.840 --> 01:06:40.080]  Now, the second question I have for you is, at one time I had read it, and you talked
[01:06:40.080 --> 01:06:44.280]  about it, but I've forgotten which chapter it's under in the transportation code. Can
[01:06:44.280 --> 01:06:54.000]  you remind me again what chapter of the transportation code defines the applicability against only
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.760]  commercial drivers and transportation?
[01:06:57.760 --> 01:07:01.400]  All of them?
[01:07:01.400 --> 01:07:02.400]  All of them?
[01:07:02.400 --> 01:07:09.400]  Okay. Where do I find that code or step?
[01:07:09.400 --> 01:07:15.520]  It does not say in plain English, this code only applies to commercial drivers. If it
[01:07:15.520 --> 01:07:20.240]  did that, this scheme would never have worked for as long as it has.
[01:07:20.240 --> 01:07:21.240]  Okay.
[01:07:21.240 --> 01:07:22.240]  Okay.
[01:07:22.240 --> 01:07:31.320]  What clues you in is where the authority comes from to regulate, that's one. The other
[01:07:31.320 --> 01:07:39.680]  is the specific terminology of what the state is regulating. It's regulating transportation.
[01:07:39.680 --> 01:07:40.680]  Okay.
[01:07:40.680 --> 01:07:45.360]  And transportation is commerce.
[01:07:45.360 --> 01:07:53.080]  Okay. And in the end, that's the definition of transportation is going to be...
[01:07:53.080 --> 01:07:55.960]  Does not exist in Texas law anywhere.
[01:07:55.960 --> 01:08:03.640]  Okay. So there's no definition within the transportation code of the word transportation?
[01:08:03.640 --> 01:08:04.640]  Nope.
[01:08:04.640 --> 01:08:05.640]  Okay.
[01:08:05.640 --> 01:08:06.640]  Okay.
[01:08:06.640 --> 01:08:10.640]  There is no definition in any code for transportation.
[01:08:10.640 --> 01:08:16.200]  So you get it out of the either blacks or boobies or whatever that is.
[01:08:16.200 --> 01:08:21.440]  We get it out of the case law, the federal case law. The transportation code in Texas
[01:08:21.440 --> 01:08:29.520]  is based on Title 49. Go read the administrative code under Title 37. It will tell you that.
[01:08:29.520 --> 01:08:36.160]  The state adopts all of Title 49 with the following exceptions. And then it gives you
[01:08:36.160 --> 01:08:41.880]  a list of specific sections out of Title 49 that are not adopted and incorporated into
[01:08:41.880 --> 01:08:45.320]  the transportation code.
[01:08:45.320 --> 01:08:55.080]  All others are from the federal law. What is the designation of Title 49 USC? Federal
[01:08:55.080 --> 01:08:59.280]  Motor Carrier Safety Act.
[01:08:59.280 --> 01:09:01.000]  All right.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  Okay.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:07.360]  Well, I have a better understanding of it now. And I want to ask one more time from
[01:09:07.360 --> 01:09:16.280]  clarification on the Attorney General question. Then based on what you're telling me, it
[01:09:16.280 --> 01:09:22.200]  only deals with child support. If it has not, there's no criminal prosecution for differences
[01:09:22.200 --> 01:09:28.240]  child abuse. Can they prosecute for child abuse? Does that come under that code?
[01:09:28.240 --> 01:09:29.240]  No.
[01:09:29.240 --> 01:09:32.360]  So the only thing is child support, okay.
[01:09:32.360 --> 01:09:40.920]  They can't prosecute any criminal action according to the Constitution, period. The legislature
[01:09:40.920 --> 01:09:49.520]  has tried to give the Attorney General's office a power it constitutionally does not have,
[01:09:49.520 --> 01:09:54.440]  which is just the indication that the legislature honestly believes they don't have to abide
[01:09:54.440 --> 01:10:00.400]  by it or that it doesn't exist. And that's why we need to fix these little legislative
[01:10:00.400 --> 01:10:02.920]  issues with these legislators.
[01:10:02.920 --> 01:10:09.560]  That's it for all that. If you didn't get a move. Well, I hope they're not still goes
[01:10:09.560 --> 01:10:15.240]  voting, but I understand that for sure. Well, I certainly thank you guys for clearing that
[01:10:15.240 --> 01:10:19.240]  up for me. I wanted to talk to a friend of mine who had a question about that. And I
[01:10:19.240 --> 01:10:25.040]  know I'd heard you speak on that before. And I had explained to my understanding that,
[01:10:25.040 --> 01:10:30.040]  you know, there's only a civil issue that the AG can prosecute.
[01:10:30.040 --> 01:10:35.680]  Article five of the Texas Constitution is all the judicial department, including the
[01:10:35.680 --> 01:10:41.320]  Attorney General's office. The section on the Attorney General is very short and to
[01:10:41.320 --> 01:10:48.880]  the point. Even Texas statute that codifies that portion of the Constitution specifically
[01:10:48.880 --> 01:10:52.120]  states his power is civil only.
[01:10:52.120 --> 01:11:01.360]  Understand it. All right. One other thing that I'd like to say to your listeners is when
[01:11:01.360 --> 01:11:06.040]  you guys come in, when listeners call in and they ask a question of either Eddie or Randy
[01:11:06.040 --> 01:11:14.160]  or Deborah, it might be a good idea a lot of times to shut up and let them answer. You
[01:11:14.160 --> 01:11:20.080]  know, if you ask a question, let the person answer it. Because a lot of times the callers
[01:11:20.080 --> 01:11:26.360]  will ask a question, but then they'll engage in a philosophical argument and it kind of
[01:11:26.360 --> 01:11:31.720]  slows the show down and it also impedes their ability to understand what you guys are trying
[01:11:31.720 --> 01:11:37.560]  to explain to them. You guys do this for free. And so when you ask a question, you know,
[01:11:37.560 --> 01:11:42.880]  it's a good idea for listeners to listen to the answer.
[01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:47.160]  Yeah, it's not going to do any good to ask the question, but not wait for the answer
[01:11:47.160 --> 01:11:52.520]  to come about. And he's right there. It's fine that you all have legal theories and
[01:11:52.520 --> 01:12:00.000]  all this. Great. It shows your thinking. But if you're asking us a question about the law
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:03.960]  until you get that answered, you don't know whether your legal theory will fly in the
[01:12:03.960 --> 01:12:04.960]  wind or not.
[01:12:04.960 --> 01:12:09.760]  So he's right there. Give us a chance to answer it. Sorry, I didn't mean to talk over you,
[01:12:09.760 --> 01:12:10.760]  Gary. Go ahead.
[01:12:10.760 --> 01:12:15.920]  I agree with you, Charlie, on that because it does, it does slow the show down and also
[01:12:15.920 --> 01:12:22.160]  a lot of times you're not even, you're not even sure if you're asking the question ever
[01:12:22.160 --> 01:12:28.000]  got the answer because they're too busy engaging in theoretical arguments or they're legal
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:32.960]  positions. So anyway, I love your show. I don't get a chance to call in very often because
[01:12:32.960 --> 01:12:37.480]  I only call in their work, but I really get a kick out list of you guys. And thanks for
[01:12:37.480 --> 01:12:38.480]  what y'all do.
[01:12:38.480 --> 01:12:41.000]  Well, thank you, Gary. Appreciate the call.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  Good night.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:48.600]  Good night. All right. We have a couple other callers now. We are going, Terry and Michigan,
[01:12:48.600 --> 01:12:53.640]  I see you there. And we're going to take Rob's call first. Okay, Rob, what can we do for
[01:12:53.640 --> 01:12:54.640]  you?
[01:12:54.640 --> 01:13:01.680]  Yeah, you're talking about administrative hearings because my child support one is coming up
[01:13:01.680 --> 01:13:10.080]  in two weeks now. And I want to know how I can best preserve anything to go beyond the
[01:13:10.080 --> 01:13:14.080]  administrative process to take it to the next level.
[01:13:14.080 --> 01:13:23.960]  Okay, hang on just a second now. Every version of that has an internal administrative process
[01:13:23.960 --> 01:13:28.520]  that doesn't go into the courtroom, such as the keeping of the records, the shuffling
[01:13:28.520 --> 01:13:34.520]  of the paperwork and so on and so forth. Don't confuse the two. We're talking about two different
[01:13:34.520 --> 01:13:49.720]  things here. Administrative law versus administrative internal process. Okay. Are you certain child
[01:13:49.720 --> 01:13:54.120]  or family law in your state is administrative?
[01:13:54.120 --> 01:14:08.400]  Well, this is under the uniform UI, FWA, something like that. And it's basically the same in
[01:14:08.400 --> 01:14:14.080]  every single state. And what they're trying to do is get something from Missouri registered
[01:14:14.080 --> 01:14:21.080]  in Connecticut. And the first thing they have is this hearing to see, you know, I objected
[01:14:21.080 --> 01:14:27.360]  to it and I'm contesting it is what I should say. And I requested the hearing according
[01:14:27.360 --> 01:14:33.960]  to the law. And this hearing is an administrative hearing.
[01:14:33.960 --> 01:14:44.120]  Okay. But again, administrative in what capacity? Technically speaking, a pretrial hearing in
[01:14:44.120 --> 01:14:50.080]  a criminal case is an administrative proceeding and that it's there for the purpose of answering
[01:14:50.080 --> 01:15:02.800]  questions of law before the trial begins. Okay. But it's not administrative law. I'm trying
[01:15:02.800 --> 01:15:09.440]  to make sure you understand the difference because that determines what rules you need
[01:15:09.440 --> 01:15:10.440]  to be reading.
[01:15:10.440 --> 01:15:19.480]  Okay. Well, it's called the tribunal and the law covering that states tribunals of state.
[01:15:19.480 --> 01:15:22.560]  That just means it's supposed to have multiple judges.
[01:15:22.560 --> 01:15:29.480]  Yeah. It says the Superior Court and the Family Support Magistrate Division of the Superior
[01:15:29.480 --> 01:15:34.960]  Court are the tribunals of this state. The family support met.
[01:15:34.960 --> 01:15:43.760]  Okay. So you need to call that court and ask them what is the nature of the proceedings?
[01:15:43.760 --> 01:15:57.840]  Are they civil, criminal, or administrative? Okay. Alrighty. So let's say it's administrative
[01:15:57.840 --> 01:16:00.080]  then what?
[01:16:00.080 --> 01:16:06.840]  Then you object to it. I do not agree to any non-judicial decision making in this case.
[01:16:06.840 --> 01:16:11.200]  Okay. So what if they answer it's judicial?
[01:16:11.200 --> 01:16:17.840]  It's not judicial. They've only got three to choose from. They can't tell you it's administrative
[01:16:17.840 --> 01:16:21.920]  law and then say it's also judicial.
[01:16:21.920 --> 01:16:25.800]  I'm sorry. I meant civil.
[01:16:25.800 --> 01:16:32.080]  If they tell you it's civil, then it's civil. You need to be reading the rules of civil
[01:16:32.080 --> 01:16:35.560]  procedure as it relates to family law.
[01:16:35.560 --> 01:16:43.480]  Okay. Now you've got to remember one other thing. Family law courts in every state are
[01:16:43.480 --> 01:16:51.480]  the absolute most corrupt of all things in existence in the forms of a court. They're
[01:16:51.480 --> 01:16:55.440]  even worse than traffic court. Hang on, Rob. We'll pick you up on the other side. This
[01:16:55.440 --> 01:17:00.880]  is Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back after the break.
[01:17:00.880 --> 01:17:04.480]  Capital Coin and Boolean is a family-owned business built on the promise to bring you
[01:17:04.480 --> 01:17:09.960]  affordable pricing on all coin and Boolean products. In addition to coins and Boolean,
[01:17:09.960 --> 01:17:14.760]  we now offer storeable freeze-dried foods produced by Augustine Farms, ammunition at
[01:17:14.760 --> 01:17:20.160]  10% above wholesale prices, Berkey Water Products, gift certificates, and our Silver
[01:17:20.160 --> 01:17:25.760]  Pool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price. We can even help you set
[01:17:25.760 --> 01:17:34.400]  up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-6404 for more details. As always, we buy, sell,
[01:17:34.400 --> 01:17:39.840]  trade precious metals, give appraisals, and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:39.840 --> 01:17:44.920]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig next
[01:17:44.920 --> 01:17:50.280]  to the Ikebond Sushi and Jeanne Carwash. We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays
[01:17:50.280 --> 01:17:57.480]  10 to 2. Visit us at capitalcoinandboolean.com or call 512-646-6440 and say you heard about
[01:17:57.480 --> 01:18:01.000]  us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.400]  What's been the problem with phone companies? High prices and contracts that lock you in
[01:18:05.400 --> 01:18:10.680]  for two years minimum, not freedomtelephones.com. Freedom telephones are designed around the
[01:18:10.680 --> 01:18:16.720]  concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty, and privacy. With freedomtelephones.com, there
[01:18:16.720 --> 01:18:21.680]  are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers required. That's why
[01:18:21.680 --> 01:18:26.600]  our name is freedomtelephones.com. Finally, residential, mobile, and business
[01:18:26.600 --> 01:18:31.160]  telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.160 --> 01:18:36.920]  Want a low price? Residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans
[01:18:36.920 --> 01:18:42.360]  started just $39.99. Plus, every month you pay your bill, freedomtelephones.com contributes
[01:18:42.360 --> 01:18:47.560]  to your favorite programs. Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and
[01:18:47.560 --> 01:18:57.720]  the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553. That's 800-600-5553. Freedomtelephones.com.
[01:18:57.720 --> 01:19:23.840]  Supportable, private, perfect. All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio.
[01:19:23.840 --> 01:19:28.840]  We are talking to Rob in Connecticut. Rob, let's wrap this up.
[01:19:28.840 --> 01:19:36.920]  Now, another thing I'm thinking about doing is going back to Missouri where it originally
[01:19:36.920 --> 01:19:44.440]  started and claiming, well, that's one of my defenses, because in the hearing I have
[01:19:44.440 --> 01:19:57.080]  in a couple of weeks says your defenses, the party contesting the validity or enforcement
[01:19:57.080 --> 01:20:02.640]  of a registered order or seeking to vacate the registration has the burden of proving
[01:20:02.640 --> 01:20:07.760]  one or more of the following defenses. The issuer and tribunal left personal jurisdiction
[01:20:07.760 --> 01:20:13.360]  over the contesting party and the order was obtained by fraud. Now, there's six other
[01:20:13.360 --> 01:20:19.480]  things, but I put down those first two, because I never got any kind of notice from Missouri
[01:20:19.480 --> 01:20:27.560]  or anything, and according to the law, this is going from the Missouri law, basis for
[01:20:27.560 --> 01:20:32.160]  jurisdiction over a nonresident, and they list all these things, and they did not do
[01:20:32.160 --> 01:20:36.840]  any of those things in that list to give them personal jurisdiction in this matter. So what
[01:20:36.840 --> 01:20:45.880]  I'm considering doing is noticing the original assistant prosecutor who went into court that
[01:20:45.880 --> 01:20:55.760]  day seven years ago and got this whole thing through the court and going after him for
[01:20:55.760 --> 01:21:02.120]  deprivation of my rights under the Title 42-1983 lawsuit.
[01:21:02.120 --> 01:21:09.000]  Well, good luck with that. I don't know that that will fly, that you have a cause of action
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:15.840]  against the attorney in that regard, malpractice maybe, fraud maybe, but I don't know about
[01:21:15.840 --> 01:21:20.840]  civil rights. You'd have to research that out and find out if there's a premise for
[01:21:20.840 --> 01:21:29.280]  that. But if they have not complied with any of the statutory rules they're supposed to
[01:21:29.280 --> 01:21:32.720]  comply with, then that's what you need to be documenting.
[01:21:32.720 --> 01:21:33.720]  Okay.
[01:21:33.720 --> 01:21:38.560]  And it says that I have the burden of proving, though.
[01:21:38.560 --> 01:21:44.520]  No, read what you just read, the first part of what you just read to me again.
[01:21:44.520 --> 01:21:52.040]  Okay. It says a party contesting the validity or enforcement of a registered order or seeking
[01:21:52.040 --> 01:21:59.640]  to vacate the registration has the burden of proving one or more of the following defenses.
[01:21:59.640 --> 01:22:06.920]  Okay. So, how do you prove they didn't do any of those things?
[01:22:06.920 --> 01:22:13.600]  Well, the only thing I can think of is to submit an affidavit in taking that Missouri
[01:22:13.600 --> 01:22:17.160]  law and turning it around and putting everything in a negative that...
[01:22:17.160 --> 01:22:22.280]  Okay. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. How is that going to prove anything?
[01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:27.160]  I say I don't know. How do I prove a negative?
[01:22:27.160 --> 01:22:34.000]  Well, it's not exactly a negative because all of those things in that statute have to
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:38.920]  have some form of paperwork to document that they occurred, don't they?
[01:22:38.920 --> 01:22:40.160]  Yeah.
[01:22:40.160 --> 01:22:42.360]  Where's the paper?
[01:22:42.360 --> 01:22:49.080]  It's got to all be in Missouri, but this is Connecticut now trying to implement what Missouri...
[01:22:49.080 --> 01:22:55.680]  Then send a records request or a discovery motion to Missouri.
[01:22:55.680 --> 01:23:04.640]  When the paperwork doesn't come and you've shown that it doesn't exist, then you've established
[01:23:04.640 --> 01:23:07.160]  proof that it wasn't followed.
[01:23:07.160 --> 01:23:13.600]  Oh, I see. Now, how do I do this without entering into their jurisdiction by special
[01:23:13.600 --> 01:23:15.080]  appearance, right?
[01:23:15.080 --> 01:23:24.280]  You don't enter into their jurisdiction. They either have subject matter or they don't.
[01:23:24.280 --> 01:23:29.400]  And for the purpose of everything else, yes, it's a special appearance. Everything you
[01:23:29.400 --> 01:23:36.440]  do is done by special appearance. Never make a general appearance when special will do,
[01:23:36.440 --> 01:23:38.160]  and it will always do.
[01:23:38.160 --> 01:23:45.160]  Okay. So what did you call this again? Requesting these documents?
[01:23:45.160 --> 01:23:50.880]  You're either going to file a motion for discovery asking for those, that information that would
[01:23:50.880 --> 01:23:57.360]  be required by the statutes in question, or you're going to do whatever is considered
[01:23:57.360 --> 01:24:04.880]  an open records request or a Freedom of Information Act or a public information or whatever is
[01:24:04.880 --> 01:24:09.640]  the process in Missouri for obtaining those records.
[01:24:09.640 --> 01:24:16.240]  All right. And I do this all under the original docket because I have found the docket number
[01:24:16.240 --> 01:24:17.960]  online for this case.
[01:24:17.960 --> 01:24:20.600]  If the docket is still ongoing, yes.
[01:24:20.600 --> 01:24:26.440]  Okay. And I do it by special appearance.
[01:24:26.440 --> 01:24:30.880]  You'll do the discovery motion by special appearance. You don't have to do... There is
[01:24:30.880 --> 01:24:35.080]  no special appearance in a records request.
[01:24:35.080 --> 01:24:41.160]  Okay. See, I'm confused. Am I making a discovery motion in Connecticut?
[01:24:41.160 --> 01:24:49.000]  Do both in Missouri and Connecticut. Whatever you need. If the statute you're looking at
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:53.640]  says this has to be proven from the one state, this has to be proven from the other state,
[01:24:53.640 --> 01:24:56.920]  you need to talk to most of them, don't you?
[01:24:56.920 --> 01:24:57.920]  Yeah.
[01:24:57.920 --> 01:25:04.080]  If the information that the statute requires can only be gotten from one state, that's
[01:25:04.080 --> 01:25:05.800]  who you've got to be talking to.
[01:25:05.800 --> 01:25:10.000]  Okay. All right. I've got another direction to go in.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:13.680]  Okay. I'll start working on that, Eddie. Thanks.
[01:25:13.680 --> 01:25:17.640]  Yes, sir. Thank you for calling in. Appreciate it.
[01:25:17.640 --> 01:25:23.360]  All right. Now we're going to go to Terry in Michigan, who just happens to be our last
[01:25:23.360 --> 01:25:27.640]  caller again, and we've got a half-fire left in the show. Please don't wait until the last
[01:25:27.640 --> 01:25:31.760]  minute to call if you've got an issue. Get in line now so I can get a dealt with or I'm
[01:25:31.760 --> 01:25:35.800]  going to run out of time and leave you hanging, and you'll either be coming to class or calling
[01:25:35.800 --> 01:25:37.800]  back later in the week.
[01:25:37.800 --> 01:25:40.520]  All right. Terry, what can we do for you?
[01:25:40.520 --> 01:25:49.400]  Hi, Eddie. My license was revoked five years ago, and when I was down at the seminar with
[01:25:49.400 --> 01:25:56.960]  you, the traffic seminar, you had said to me that what I need to do is I need to send
[01:25:56.960 --> 01:26:04.360]  a letter in to rescind and revoke it. I was eligible to apply to get it back in 2008,
[01:26:04.360 --> 01:26:13.240]  but they want... It's going to cost like $3,000 for all the rigamole you've got to go through.
[01:26:13.240 --> 01:26:19.880]  So what I'm looking at is sending a letter to them, and I wanted to ask you if I'm setting
[01:26:19.880 --> 01:26:21.760]  up my letter properly.
[01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:27.720]  Well, first off, who are you wanting to send this letter to?
[01:26:27.720 --> 01:26:33.680]  Well, when I talked at the traffic seminar, you said send it to the Secretary of State,
[01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:41.320]  the Sheriff's Department, the State Police. Do I need to do all three of those or...?
[01:26:41.320 --> 01:26:49.560]  Okay. All right. Well, the seminar was in October 2009, so you're going to kind of have
[01:26:49.560 --> 01:26:53.760]  to refresh my memory as to exactly what this was supposed to accomplish.
[01:26:53.760 --> 01:27:01.240]  Well, you said that as long as the State only has it revoked, then you're still under their
[01:27:01.240 --> 01:27:09.880]  jurisdiction, but if I send in a letter to revoke it from my side, then what's... Because
[01:27:09.880 --> 01:27:10.880]  I'm the referee...
[01:27:10.880 --> 01:27:18.760]  Okay. All right. Okay. I understand now. Okay. The issue here is, was this license suspended
[01:27:18.760 --> 01:27:25.880]  by the State before you attempted to give it back?
[01:27:25.880 --> 01:27:27.440]  Yes.
[01:27:27.440 --> 01:27:38.240]  Okay. So if that's the case, then they're going to consider they have the legitimate claim,
[01:27:38.240 --> 01:27:45.320]  but that doesn't change the fact of whether or not you need the license to begin with.
[01:27:45.320 --> 01:27:53.240]  Again, that's what I was looking at in the way that I wrote the letter. It's real short.
[01:27:53.240 --> 01:27:58.400]  It's only four lines here. Let me tell you what I want to send them. The letter's going
[01:27:58.400 --> 01:28:04.640]  to say, this is a letter to rescind and revoke by Michigan driver's license number, blah,
[01:28:04.640 --> 01:28:10.160]  blah, blah. It will not be engaged in commerce or transportation, and therefore I'm rescinding
[01:28:10.160 --> 01:28:17.080]  and revoking my license, and then get it notarized and send it return receipt.
[01:28:17.080 --> 01:28:25.080]  Well, the fact that you use the terminology, I will no longer. That's not good.
[01:28:25.080 --> 01:28:29.080]  Okay. Well, I didn't say no longer. Just that I will not be engaged.
[01:28:29.080 --> 01:28:36.240]  Okay. Well, I will not be engaged. Why not? I've had a license for X number of years and
[01:28:36.240 --> 01:28:41.920]  not once have I ever used it for the purpose of transportation. Therefore, I would tend
[01:28:41.920 --> 01:28:49.320]  to think that since I'm not engaging in the act, I don't need a license for it. So I won't
[01:28:49.320 --> 01:28:55.040]  be renewing it. I won't be doing anything associated with it. Have a nice day.
[01:28:55.040 --> 01:29:02.120]  Okay. That makes sense. That's what I wanted to check with you and to see if I'm barking
[01:29:02.120 --> 01:29:08.400]  up the right tree or not. Well, whether or not it's the right tree, time will tell, but
[01:29:08.400 --> 01:29:14.120]  remember this is a fight that's going to start rolling because the next time you get stopped,
[01:29:14.120 --> 01:29:20.640]  they're still going to make the presumption the license is required. And you know that.
[01:29:20.640 --> 01:29:26.640]  Great. So you better be prepared for the fight that's going to ensue afterward.
[01:29:26.640 --> 01:29:35.720]  Yep. I understand that. Okay. And I'm working on it. Okay. Well, hang in here then.
[01:29:35.720 --> 01:29:42.960]  All right, Terry. Thanks for calling me. Anything else? No, I should do it. All right. See you
[01:29:42.960 --> 01:29:46.960]  later. All right. Jane, we see you there on the board. Hang on and I'll get you on the
[01:29:46.960 --> 01:29:53.800]  other side of the break. Call in number 512-646-1984. We're going to be at the half hour mark
[01:29:53.800 --> 01:29:58.480]  on the other side, folks. So get in line now. This is Eddie Craig. There's Stephen, Randy
[01:29:58.480 --> 01:30:00.280]  Kelton. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.280 --> 01:30:05.680]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The
[01:30:05.680 --> 01:30:10.400]  government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:30:10.400 --> 01:30:14.640]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:30:14.640 --> 01:30:19.200]  given their lives. And thousands of my fellow first responders are flying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:30:19.200 --> 01:30:22.240]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an
[01:30:22.240 --> 01:30:27.240]  Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:30:27.240 --> 01:30:33.600]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. The rule of law radio network is proud to present
[01:30:33.600 --> 01:30:38.480]  a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig. Eddie is a former Nacodotius
[01:30:38.480 --> 01:30:42.360]  sheriff's deputy and for the past 21 years he's been studying the due process of law
[01:30:42.360 --> 01:30:47.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:53.160]  at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street. Admission is $20, so please make plans
[01:30:53.160 --> 01:30:57.640]  to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really
[01:30:57.640 --> 01:31:06.120]  is. At hempusa.org we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying,
[01:31:06.120 --> 01:31:10.800]  self-healing while rebuilding the immune system. We urge our listeners to please consider our
[01:31:10.800 --> 01:31:17.800]  largest selling product, micro plant powder. Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine,
[01:31:17.800 --> 01:31:22.840]  probiotics, zinc and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy
[01:31:22.840 --> 01:31:27.520]  stomach flora. Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to
[01:31:27.520 --> 01:31:33.360]  your storage shelter. We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember
[01:31:33.360 --> 01:31:37.920]  all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat. We constantly strive to give
[01:31:37.920 --> 01:31:42.640]  you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere and we offer free
[01:31:42.640 --> 01:31:51.960]  shipping on orders over $95 in the US. Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:51.960 --> 01:31:59.760]  That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:31:59.760 --> 01:32:09.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at Logos Radio Network.com.
[01:32:09.760 --> 01:32:27.760]  Hi folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio.
[01:32:27.760 --> 01:32:32.240]  We had our caller disappear off the board. Jane, if you're out there, give us a call
[01:32:32.240 --> 01:32:39.040]  back. You dropped off the board here. Okay, while we're waiting on somebody else to call
[01:32:39.040 --> 01:32:46.040]  in, let's continue on with this. Now, this past Sunday in class, we had several people
[01:32:46.040 --> 01:32:51.360]  there that had new tickets and new issues. So, I want to go over something real quick
[01:32:51.360 --> 01:32:55.760]  that most people that are getting tickets, especially if the ticket is written at the
[01:32:55.760 --> 01:33:01.720]  scene of an accident. There are specific things in Texas law you need to be aware of because
[01:33:01.720 --> 01:33:09.200]  it's for certain the cops aren't. That or they're extremely stupid. I'm not going to
[01:33:09.200 --> 01:33:15.920]  waste my money betting as to which one that may actually be. But in any case, we have
[01:33:15.920 --> 01:33:23.880]  in statute what's known as a general provision, which that simply means, generally speaking,
[01:33:23.880 --> 01:33:31.480]  this provision gives this authority and it will always give this authority. Then what
[01:33:31.480 --> 01:33:41.160]  you have is a local and specific provision of law. That means local to the subject matter
[01:33:41.160 --> 01:33:49.240]  being dealt with, for instance, the transportation code. So, the subject is transportation and
[01:33:49.240 --> 01:33:59.960]  this section of statute is local to that code and that subject and it is specific. It gives
[01:33:59.960 --> 01:34:11.720]  specific authority or makes a specific declaration about that subject and that code. So, how
[01:34:11.720 --> 01:34:19.280]  does this tie together? Well, we have two different provisions regarding the authority
[01:34:19.280 --> 01:34:26.240]  of officers to arrest without warrant. We have the code of criminal procedure provision
[01:34:26.240 --> 01:34:38.440]  under 1401A and B and under 1401A, it specifically states any peace officer or any other person
[01:34:38.440 --> 01:34:47.680]  may arrest without warrant anyone committing in their presence or view an act which constitutes
[01:34:47.680 --> 01:34:58.920]  a felony or a breach of the peace. So, right off the bat, the qualification is that to
[01:34:58.920 --> 01:35:04.880]  arrest without warrant requires the act to be a felony or a breach of the peace. Well,
[01:35:04.880 --> 01:35:13.640]  back in I think 69, we had some state's attorney general here in Texas that was upset because
[01:35:13.640 --> 01:35:19.720]  the cops couldn't arrest for anything that was committed in their presence. He thought
[01:35:19.720 --> 01:35:29.720]  it was too much of a restriction on government to require a warrant for the officer to arrest
[01:35:29.720 --> 01:35:40.280]  even if he saw the incident. So, he petitioned and got passed subsection B of 1401 which
[01:35:40.280 --> 01:35:47.360]  says a peace officer may arrest for any offense committed in his presence or view. Now, that
[01:35:47.360 --> 01:35:57.440]  creates a conflict apparently between subsection B and A because A specifically limits that
[01:35:57.440 --> 01:36:05.840]  authority to felonies and breaches of the peace whereas B simply says you can arrest
[01:36:05.840 --> 01:36:14.960]  without a warrant for anything. The problem is that Texas case law agrees with A, not
[01:36:14.960 --> 01:36:23.280]  with B and that is that the requirement is that since the Constitution requires a warrant
[01:36:23.280 --> 01:36:31.640]  for an arrest, there has to be some special circumstance for when the offense constitutes
[01:36:31.640 --> 01:36:39.480]  the necessity of arresting without it and that of course would be a felony in progress
[01:36:39.480 --> 01:36:49.600]  or breach of the peace in progress, presence or view. Okay? Otherwise, get a warrant. If
[01:36:49.600 --> 01:36:56.480]  the perpetrator is not making any attempt to escape in the case of a felony and you
[01:36:56.480 --> 01:37:04.160]  know where to find the, then even then you can arrest him without a warrant and that's
[01:37:04.160 --> 01:37:10.800]  there's case law all through Texas in Vernon's annotated civil statutes on exactly that case
[01:37:10.800 --> 01:37:18.800]  and subject. Now, we go and we look at the statute and we determine that this is the
[01:37:18.800 --> 01:37:25.240]  general provision. Generally speaking, an officer can arrest for any offense committed
[01:37:25.240 --> 01:37:33.000]  in his presence or view. Now, we get to the specific issue of the transportation code
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:43.120]  under 543.001 where it specifically states any peace officer may arrest without warrant
[01:37:43.120 --> 01:37:56.840]  a person found committing a violation of this subtitle, meaning subtitle C. Okay? That section
[01:37:56.840 --> 01:38:05.960]  of 543 is in subtitle C. Subtitle C spans chapters 541 through 600 of the transportation
[01:38:05.960 --> 01:38:15.120]  code. Now, that language found committing specifically requires that the officer come
[01:38:15.120 --> 01:38:22.640]  across the offense while it's in progress committing present tense. It must be happening.
[01:38:22.640 --> 01:38:35.880]  See the IMG thing? Found committing. It must be happening. Okay? That provision is local
[01:38:35.880 --> 01:38:44.560]  and specific to the transportation code and it limits the authority to arrest without
[01:38:44.560 --> 01:38:54.280]  warrant to the offenses codified in subtitle C. The local specific provision according
[01:38:54.280 --> 01:39:03.280]  to the courts always supersedes and even chapter 311 of the government code says this that
[01:39:03.280 --> 01:39:12.000]  when two provisions of law conflict, the local and specific provision will control unless
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:19.360]  something is stated in statute that specifically requires the general provision to control.
[01:39:19.360 --> 01:39:26.160]  Well, there's no such statement in the transportation code and there is a local and specific provision
[01:39:26.160 --> 01:39:31.280]  that limits the authority to arrest without warrant for transportation offenses to those
[01:39:31.280 --> 01:39:41.960]  codified in subtitle C only. So, when a police officer shows up at the scene of an accident
[01:39:41.960 --> 01:39:50.160]  after the fact and starts writing tickets, he is acting without authority. He is guilty
[01:39:50.160 --> 01:39:59.280]  of false imprisonment because Texas law is very clear under both 1406B and C and 543
[01:39:59.280 --> 01:40:06.840]  transportation code that in order to write a citation for a misdemeanor offense, the
[01:40:06.840 --> 01:40:15.520]  officer is first required to place the individual in a custodial arrest. In every instance,
[01:40:15.520 --> 01:40:23.760]  it reads that the arresting officer may only release the person arrested from custody if
[01:40:23.760 --> 01:40:29.720]  the person will sign the promise to appear on the citation. Now, this is for any A, B
[01:40:29.720 --> 01:40:37.120]  or C misdemeanor, okay? They're authorized to write citations for any of those even though
[01:40:37.120 --> 01:40:46.400]  A's and B's are jailable offenses if they're found guilty. So, in relation to the transportation
[01:40:46.400 --> 01:40:54.840]  code, that offense specifically limits his ability to arrest if that offense is in subtitle
[01:40:54.840 --> 01:41:04.680]  C. No other offense. Driver's license, 521. That's outside 541 to 600. Registration, that's
[01:41:04.680 --> 01:41:15.160]  502. Certificates of title, that's 501. All of them outside of subtitle C. Inspection
[01:41:15.160 --> 01:41:22.280]  is the only one inside subtitle C. Failure to maintain financial responsibility, chapter
[01:41:22.280 --> 01:41:33.040]  601, subtitle D, not C. So, you see, officers, when you want to write me a ticket and take
[01:41:33.040 --> 01:41:40.040]  me to jail or anything in relation to these other alleged offenses, and they're the entire
[01:41:40.040 --> 01:41:48.960]  reason you placed me in this custody to begin with, I'm going to sue you so fast, so hard,
[01:41:48.960 --> 01:41:56.840]  that your life is going to want to kick your butt for costing both of you everything, okay?
[01:41:56.840 --> 01:42:01.960]  If you guys are not willing to learn the limit of your authority because you have gotten
[01:42:01.960 --> 01:42:08.920]  the arrogant attitude that there are no limits to your authority, believe me when I tell
[01:42:08.920 --> 01:42:15.280]  you that I am doing my dead-level best to educate the people of Texas and anybody else
[01:42:15.280 --> 01:42:22.280]  that will listen in any other state exactly how to take a pair of steel-toed boots, well,
[01:42:22.280 --> 01:42:29.920]  the spike on the end, and drop-kick your butt when it's a damn hard you choke on the spike.
[01:42:29.920 --> 01:42:34.920]  And people, that's what we need to be doing to these guys, so we can make an example out
[01:42:34.920 --> 01:42:42.000]  of one more of them. The rest of them aren't going to fall in line. So, let's start making
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:49.280]  some examples, folks. All right. We seem to have picked up another caller. That's Ali
[01:42:49.280 --> 01:42:54.760]  or Ali in Texas. I'll figure out which one here in a second. Is it Ali or Ali?
[01:42:54.760 --> 01:42:55.760]  Ali?
[01:42:55.760 --> 01:42:58.760]  Ali. All right. What do we got?
[01:42:58.760 --> 01:43:05.760]  Say, I got a ticket a couple of weeks ago. I was allegedly going too fast, right? And
[01:43:05.760 --> 01:43:10.400]  the police officer wasn't sure about the location he gave me a ticket, so he wrote down one
[01:43:10.400 --> 01:43:14.280]  address, then he scratched it off, then wrote another one, scratched that one off, and wrote
[01:43:14.280 --> 01:43:18.800]  the third one. Another one appears to be right, because I went back to the same location and
[01:43:18.800 --> 01:43:23.840]  I looked at the address, and he did not get the address right. Do I have a call to have
[01:43:23.840 --> 01:43:26.560]  this ticket thrown at his court?
[01:43:26.560 --> 01:43:28.560]  Who wrote the ticket?
[01:43:28.560 --> 01:43:30.560]  The police officer.
[01:43:30.560 --> 01:43:38.560]  Okay. That much I got. I didn't figure a meter-mate did it. Who wrote the ticket? Austin PD, DPS,
[01:43:38.560 --> 01:43:40.720]  Sheriff. Who wrote it?
[01:43:40.720 --> 01:43:41.720]  APD.
[01:43:41.720 --> 01:43:48.440]  APD. All right. Ali, hang on just a minute. I'll finish answering this on the other side.
[01:43:48.440 --> 01:43:55.200]  This is Rule of Law radio. Call that number is 512-646-1984. We've only got 15 minutes
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:44:00.560]  left when we get back, folks. This is your absolute last chance right back.
[01:44:00.560 --> 01:44:06.640]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:44:06.640 --> 01:44:12.080]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:44:12.080 --> 01:44:17.640]  what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:44:17.640 --> 01:44:26.640]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102
[01:44:26.640 --> 01:44:33.640]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:44:33.640 --> 01:44:40.280]  13,000 cross-references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:44:40.280 --> 01:44:45.280]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery
[01:44:45.280 --> 01:44:59.080]  Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:44:59.080 --> 01:45:06.080]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.080 --> 01:45:14.080]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.080 --> 01:45:20.080]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.080 --> 01:45:26.080]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now
[01:45:26.080 --> 01:45:33.080]  you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[01:45:33.080 --> 01:45:38.080]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.080 --> 01:45:44.080]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[01:45:44.080 --> 01:45:52.080]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.080 --> 01:45:59.080]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.080 --> 01:46:32.080]  All right, we are back. This is ruleoflaw radio. We are talking to Ali in Texas. Okay,
[01:46:32.080 --> 01:46:38.080]  if Austin P.D. wrote your ticket, Ali, the first thing is, how many pages is this form
[01:46:38.080 --> 01:46:41.080]  you have from the officer?
[01:46:41.080 --> 01:46:53.080]  Let's see. Three pages, I think. Three. Normally, it's five. You could be right.
[01:46:53.080 --> 01:47:00.080]  Okay. Do not, under any circumstances, tear them apart. Leave them attached to each other.
[01:47:00.080 --> 01:47:10.080]  Got it? Yes, yes. Okay. If it's an Austin P.D. ticket, I can almost 100% guarantee you
[01:47:10.080 --> 01:47:17.080]  it violates 708.105 of the Texas Transportation Code. Could you repeat that again, please?
[01:47:17.080 --> 01:47:24.080]  If it is an Austin P.D. ticket, I can almost guarantee you with 100% certainty that it will
[01:47:24.080 --> 01:47:43.080]  violate section 708.105 of the Transportation Code. 708.105. When are you supposed to appear
[01:47:43.080 --> 01:47:46.080]  in court if you got this two weeks ago?
[01:47:46.080 --> 01:47:56.080]  18, and I asked for an extension on that one. Did you get it? I have not received any reply yet.
[01:47:56.080 --> 01:48:05.080]  Did you get it notarized when you filed it? Yes, yes. Okay. Well, be prepared anyway,
[01:48:05.080 --> 01:48:10.080]  but that's the date you're supposed to appear on the ticket, right? Yes, yes.
[01:48:10.080 --> 01:48:14.080]  Okay. It wouldn't have mattered if you asked for an extension because you won't see a judge
[01:48:14.080 --> 01:48:18.080]  when you go in there. The clerk will try to foist you off on everything. You need to
[01:48:18.080 --> 01:48:27.080]  be in class Sunday. Okay. Okay. Two to five brave new books down at Guadalupe and Martin
[01:48:27.080 --> 01:48:37.080]  Luther King. All right. Be down there. We'll go over this. We're doing court proceedings
[01:48:37.080 --> 01:48:43.080]  on Sunday, so this will help you out a lot and we'll also point out exactly what's wrong
[01:48:43.080 --> 01:48:48.080]  with that ticket. All right. I'll see you then. I appreciate it. Thank you very much.
[01:48:48.080 --> 01:48:53.080]  Okay. You have a good evening. Thanks for calling in. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. All right.
[01:48:53.080 --> 01:48:58.080]  Now we're going to go to Daryl in Texas. Daryl, what can we do for you?
[01:48:58.080 --> 01:49:02.080]  Hi, Ed. How are you doing? I'm doing good. Do you?
[01:49:02.080 --> 01:49:08.080]  Well, I was doing good till I arrested Ney for driving with a license invalid.
[01:49:08.080 --> 01:49:15.080]  It was the sheriff's department, Travis County. I just heard you mention that driving a license
[01:49:15.080 --> 01:49:20.080]  invalid is not underneath the code where they can arrest me for it.
[01:49:20.080 --> 01:49:24.080]  Anyway, I want to talk to you about that. That's in Chapter 521.
[01:49:24.080 --> 01:49:28.080]  Yeah. I want to sue them. I'm not playing games this time. They got my car. I can't get it back.
[01:49:28.080 --> 01:49:32.080]  It's the second time they've done this to me. I'm going to sue everyone I can.
[01:49:32.080 --> 01:49:36.080]  So I just want to let everybody know out there that I'm going to come and talk to you and I'm going
[01:49:36.080 --> 01:49:41.080]  to sue these people and we'll get the results on the radio afterwards.
[01:49:41.080 --> 01:49:46.080]  Well, that's going to take some doing, Daryl, because you're going to have to sue them in federal court.
[01:49:46.080 --> 01:49:54.080]  And you're going to have to go in and plead and form a popris, which gives the federal court the ability to throw it out.
[01:49:54.080 --> 01:49:58.080]  Or you're going to have to have the money to pay for it as you go. And that ain't going to be cheap.
[01:49:58.080 --> 01:50:04.080]  You're looking somewhere between $8,000 to $10,000 to prosecute one of these cases from beginning to end.
[01:50:04.080 --> 01:50:09.080]  Even I'm having to ask for money to pay for mine to get it through there because I don't have it.
[01:50:09.080 --> 01:50:12.080]  Yes. I remember I went to your case to watch that. I witnessed that.
[01:50:12.080 --> 01:50:15.080]  And yeah, they realized we're going to cross that much money.
[01:50:15.080 --> 01:50:17.080]  Well, anyways, I want to talk to you about what can be done.
[01:50:17.080 --> 01:50:22.080]  I got to go see someone tomorrow. Dave, he seems to know quite a bit. And Mike, you know, Mike,
[01:50:22.080 --> 01:50:25.080]  there's a lot of things we're going to do to him. But I'm going to try to do everything I can.
[01:50:25.080 --> 01:50:27.080]  I don't think I'll be able to get the guy back there, too.
[01:50:27.080 --> 01:50:31.080]  But thanks a lot, Ed. I'll talk to you soon.
[01:50:31.080 --> 01:50:33.080]  All right, Daryl. Have a good night.
[01:50:33.080 --> 01:50:40.080]  All right. All right, we're going to go to Paula in Maine now. Paula, what can we do for you?
[01:50:40.080 --> 01:50:48.080]  Hi, Beth. Okay, two years ago, I was pulled over and ticketed for speeding.
[01:50:48.080 --> 01:50:53.080]  I told the officer when he wanted me to sign the summons, I said,
[01:50:53.080 --> 01:51:00.080]  well, anything I sign, I'll be signing under duress and any contract signed under duress is void.
[01:51:00.080 --> 01:51:09.080]  But so I proceeded to sign after writing on the ticket, you know, under duress.
[01:51:09.080 --> 01:51:15.080]  And then he yanked it out of my hand before I could finish signing my complete name.
[01:51:15.080 --> 01:51:21.080]  So I filed motions to dismiss and all kinds of other things.
[01:51:21.080 --> 01:51:31.080]  And they kept denying, denying them. And I eventually went into the courthouse and I told the judge,
[01:51:31.080 --> 01:51:41.080]  you, the police officer and the prosecutor, I'll work for the state of Maine so I cannot possibly get a fair trial.
[01:51:41.080 --> 01:51:45.080]  I had filed a motion for a trial by Jerry.
[01:51:45.080 --> 01:51:54.080]  He said, no, well, we're not going to have a jury trial. And I said, well, then I'm not going to proceed.
[01:51:54.080 --> 01:52:03.080]  And he found me guilty. So basically I didn't get a trial.
[01:52:03.080 --> 01:52:05.080]  And I had to...
[01:52:05.080 --> 01:52:09.080]  What is the nature of a traffic citation in Maine?
[01:52:09.080 --> 01:52:11.080]  The nature of it.
[01:52:11.080 --> 01:52:17.080]  Are they civil, criminal or administrative?
[01:52:17.080 --> 01:52:21.080]  What do they tell you it is?
[01:52:21.080 --> 01:52:28.080]  Well, I'm not sure and I don't have the information right in front of me.
[01:52:28.080 --> 01:52:32.080]  Okay. Well, then that may be why you didn't get a jury trial.
[01:52:32.080 --> 01:52:38.080]  And what you should have been objecting to was non-judicial decision making.
[01:52:38.080 --> 01:52:47.080]  Because if they're running it as an administrative court, then he can't be sitting up there judicially.
[01:52:47.080 --> 01:52:49.080]  Okay, well...
[01:52:49.080 --> 01:52:55.080]  And if it's administrative, you're not entitled to anything except what the administrative rules say you are.
[01:52:55.080 --> 01:53:03.080]  The clerk did say and she did provide me with a form for a jury trial, which I...
[01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:10.080]  Okay, then why did you not file complaints against the judge, both criminal and judicial?
[01:53:10.080 --> 01:53:18.080]  I filed a judicial one with the Committee for Judicial Responsibility. I think I did.
[01:53:18.080 --> 01:53:23.080]  Before or after the alleged trial?
[01:53:23.080 --> 01:53:37.080]  Not sure. I actually... What happened was when he was presiding over another matter, it was a tenant landlord matter,
[01:53:37.080 --> 01:53:46.080]  which I was the landlord, I said, well, I, you know, I filed paperwork trying to disqualify him.
[01:53:46.080 --> 01:53:53.080]  And I sent that to the Chief Justice of the District Court.
[01:53:53.080 --> 01:54:01.080]  And he did nothing. He just basically said he did not have the authority or he just missed it, you know?
[01:54:01.080 --> 01:54:09.080]  Well, no, I don't know. What did he do? What did he return to you in writing about what he could or couldn't do?
[01:54:09.080 --> 01:54:19.080]  I mean, he either ignored it or he never got it, or he denied it after he got it. Which one?
[01:54:19.080 --> 01:54:22.080]  I think he denied it.
[01:54:22.080 --> 01:54:27.080]  Okay, then where was the notice to you that it was denied?
[01:54:27.080 --> 01:54:33.080]  I got a letter from the Chief Justice.
[01:54:33.080 --> 01:54:42.080]  Okay, and what was his legal reasoning for denying it?
[01:54:42.080 --> 01:54:45.080]  I can't remember. I'll have to look it up.
[01:54:45.080 --> 01:54:51.080]  Okay, what did you cite as your reason that it was required?
[01:54:51.080 --> 01:54:54.080]  That what was required to trial.
[01:54:54.080 --> 01:55:00.080]  No, the recusal or disqualification of the judge.
[01:55:00.080 --> 01:55:08.080]  But that he had denied me through process of the law by denying the jury trial, which I was entitled to by...
[01:55:08.080 --> 01:55:13.080]  Okay, but that would have only, that would have had to have already happened.
[01:55:13.080 --> 01:55:24.080]  How can you disqualify a judge from a past act?
[01:55:24.080 --> 01:55:30.080]  I don't know. Disqualified, you have to disqualify before?
[01:55:30.080 --> 01:55:39.080]  You have to disqualify before he presides over whatever it is you're trying to get him disqualified from.
[01:55:39.080 --> 01:55:46.080]  Now, you can honestly make the statement, but you would have had to have taken it to appeal to do it.
[01:55:46.080 --> 01:55:52.080]  Had you gone to the appeals court with it and said, I was denied my right to a jury trial,
[01:55:52.080 --> 01:55:56.080]  the appeals court would have had to have overturned the conviction.
[01:55:56.080 --> 01:56:06.080]  But if you didn't follow through with that, then you accepted what happened. You agreed to it.
[01:56:06.080 --> 01:56:11.080]  That's exactly how they're going to look at it.
[01:56:11.080 --> 01:56:16.080]  I guess I still have a lot to learn and I don't have that case right in front of me. It's not fresh in my mind.
[01:56:16.080 --> 01:56:25.080]  But there is one that's coming up. I have a hearing on the 18th, but it's not regarding a traffic matter,
[01:56:25.080 --> 01:56:34.080]  but it does have to do with administrative law or it's an unemployment, a denial of unemployment benefits
[01:56:34.080 --> 01:56:46.080]  in which I've already made it known to the court that the judge and the assistant district attorney...
[01:56:46.080 --> 01:56:48.080]  No, it's not an assistant district attorney.
[01:56:48.080 --> 01:56:56.080]  The attorney general and assistant to the attorney general said they both get paid by the same source.
[01:56:56.080 --> 01:56:58.080]  That's my belief anyway.
[01:56:58.080 --> 01:57:04.080]  And they failed to answer when I asked them questions at a telephone conference the other day.
[01:57:04.080 --> 01:57:07.080]  I said, who signs your paycheck?
[01:57:07.080 --> 01:57:13.080]  I asked both the judge and the attorney general, assistant attorney general, and they would not answer.
[01:57:13.080 --> 01:57:19.080]  The judge said he would not subject itself to interrogatories by the...
[01:57:19.080 --> 01:57:25.080]  by me and the attorney, the assistant to AG.
[01:57:25.080 --> 01:57:34.080]  They never will. What you need to be doing in these cases is either, depending upon the situation,
[01:57:34.080 --> 01:57:44.080]  is either challenging jurisdiction, recusing or disqualifying the judge with a proper legal basis for the recusal or disqualification.
[01:57:44.080 --> 01:57:48.080]  Those are the things you need to be doing.
[01:57:48.080 --> 01:57:59.080]  Or knowing the rules the judge is required to follow so that you can make him play the game that you have been given the rules to play.
[01:57:59.080 --> 01:58:03.080]  But that takes reading, learning, and applying.
[01:58:03.080 --> 01:58:11.080]  Challenging who writes their paycheck, though it is a conflict of interest, isn't going to get you anywhere.
[01:58:11.080 --> 01:58:14.080]  There's a different truck you have to take on this.
[01:58:14.080 --> 01:58:19.080]  But if you like, we can talk about this in a different day. We are out of time on this show, Paula,
[01:58:19.080 --> 01:58:24.080]  but I do thank you for calling in, and I'm sorry if I haven't been able to give you any recommendations,
[01:58:24.080 --> 01:58:27.080]  but call back in Thursday or Friday if you need to, okay?
[01:58:27.080 --> 01:58:29.080]  Okay.
[01:58:29.080 --> 01:58:35.080]  All right. This has been Rule of Law Radio. This is Eddie Craig with Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[01:58:35.080 --> 01:58:39.080]  Thank you all for listening. Thank you all for your support.
[01:58:39.080 --> 01:58:45.080]  I still have a federal case coming up, and I still need your financial help, folks, so please donate.
[01:58:45.080 --> 01:58:50.080]  Thank you, and God bless.
[01:58:50.080 --> 01:58:54.080]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:58:54.080 --> 01:58:55.080]  It is Ron Paul.
[01:58:55.080 --> 01:58:57.080]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute.
[01:58:57.080 --> 01:59:00.080]  Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:59:00.080 --> 01:59:03.080]  Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:59:03.080 --> 01:59:05.080]  Of course you do.
[01:59:05.080 --> 01:59:10.080]  Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:59:10.080 --> 01:59:13.080]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[01:59:13.080 --> 01:59:18.080]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:59:18.080 --> 01:59:21.080]  Brave New Books? Did they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:59:21.080 --> 01:59:27.080]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:59:27.080 --> 01:59:30.080]  Ugh, that sounds like that show in the Discovery Channel.
[01:59:30.080 --> 01:59:37.080]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earth Skills School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBooksStore.com.
[01:59:37.080 --> 01:59:38.080]  What are you doing?
[01:59:38.080 --> 01:59:43.080]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBooksStore.com or down to the bookstore in person.
[01:59:43.080 --> 01:59:44.080]  Where's that located?
[01:59:44.080 --> 01:59:46.080]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:59:46.080 --> 01:59:48.080]  There, it's sent. I even made a smiley face.
[01:59:48.080 --> 02:00:00.080]  Great.