[00:00.000 --> 00:08.900]  A new study in the journal Science Friday has found climate change is spurring global
[00:08.900 --> 00:10.280]  food prices.
[00:10.280 --> 00:15.240]  The authors used crop yield models with and without changes in temperature and rainfall
[00:15.240 --> 00:22.320]  to show global drops in wheat output of 5.5% and 3.8% for corn was the result of climate
[00:22.320 --> 00:23.320]  change.
[00:23.320 --> 00:28.480]  That is equivalent to the entire annual corn crop of Mexico or the wheat crop of France,
[00:28.480 --> 00:31.880]  the EU's biggest producer.
[00:31.880 --> 00:35.560]  Pro and anti-government crowds returned to the streets of Yemen Friday.
[00:35.560 --> 00:41.160]  A Gulf states brokered exit deal for president Ali Abdullah Saleh to step down has been put
[00:41.160 --> 00:44.920]  on hold as the 30-year ruler resists calls to quit.
[00:44.920 --> 00:50.760]  Demonstrators say the opposition parties who have agreed to the GCC deal giving Saleh immunity
[00:50.760 --> 00:54.080]  once he leaves office do not represent them.
[00:54.080 --> 00:59.360]  They say protests will continue even if a deal is reached.
[00:59.360 --> 01:04.800]  World Economic Forum delegates Friday urged trade between China and Africa to move beyond
[01:04.800 --> 01:10.200]  Chinese hunger for commodities and the influx of cheap imports into the world's poorest
[01:10.200 --> 01:11.200]  continent.
[01:11.200 --> 01:16.160]  South African Trade Minister Rob Davies told a session of the WEF on Africa, quote, we
[01:16.160 --> 01:18.980]  cannot live on just a mineral boom and imports.
[01:18.980 --> 01:24.040]  We have to occupy that productive space as African countries.
[01:24.040 --> 01:28.520]  Studies at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Plant in Port Gibson, Mississippi last Thursday released
[01:28.520 --> 01:33.480]  a large amount of radioactive tritium directly into the Mississippi River.
[01:33.480 --> 01:38.840]  An investigation is underway to determine why the tritium was even present in an abandoned
[01:38.840 --> 01:43.880]  unit of the plant as well as how much of this dangerous nuclear byproduct got dumped into
[01:43.880 --> 01:44.960]  the river.
[01:44.960 --> 01:50.360]  Unit two with a partially constructed abandoned structure that shouldn't have contained radioactive
[01:50.360 --> 01:55.320]  materials, let alone tritium, which is used to manufacture and test atomic bombs.
[01:55.320 --> 02:00.920]  Laura Usiling, public affairs officer at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, admitted concentrations
[02:00.920 --> 02:06.720]  of tritium exceeded EPA drinking water limits, but claimed it should not represent a public
[02:06.720 --> 02:11.480]  health hazard because it was diluted in the river.
[02:11.480 --> 02:17.760]  Middle East countries spent more than $111 billion on weapons in 2010, a clear indication
[02:17.760 --> 02:23.120]  Western arms dealers circumvented international treaties that forbid exports to repressive
[02:23.120 --> 02:24.660]  regimes.
[02:24.660 --> 02:30.080]  Last year, Mideast nations accounted for over 75% of U.S. arms sales, with Saudi Arabia
[02:30.080 --> 02:34.080]  the leading buyer, ordering more than $60 billion worth.
[02:34.080 --> 02:38.760]  Human rights advocates say the U.S. circumvents legislation like the Leah Amendment, which
[02:38.760 --> 02:45.520]  prohibits U.S. arms sales to governments that fail to curb grave human rights violations.
[02:45.520 --> 02:51.360]  In Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Egypt, U.S. made tear gas, tanks, and other military
[02:51.360 --> 02:54.960]  equipment used to suppress anti-regime rebellions.
[02:54.960 --> 03:05.760]  For more details on these stories, visit www.inmworldreport.net.
[03:05.760 --> 03:12.720]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:12.720 --> 03:19.720]  talk radio at its best.
[03:42.720 --> 04:00.600]  All right, bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do when we come for you?
[04:00.600 --> 04:09.040]  Here on ruleoflawradio.com, Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, if you get hot,
[04:09.040 --> 04:10.960]  you must get cool.
[04:10.960 --> 04:17.200]  We're all about balance and evening it out, the scales of justice.
[04:17.200 --> 04:22.920]  And tonight is our Friday for our info marathon.
[04:22.920 --> 04:30.400]  This is Friday, May 6th, and we have Heather Fazio from Texans for Accountable Governments,
[04:30.400 --> 04:37.000]  and she is going to discuss with us a very important bill that is coming up in committee
[04:37.000 --> 04:42.960]  hearing this Tuesday concerning the implementation of the Real ID Act in Texas.
[04:42.960 --> 04:44.960]  Heather, break it down for us.
[04:44.960 --> 04:46.960]  Hi, good evening, guys.
[04:46.960 --> 04:48.960]  Thanks for having me on.
[04:48.960 --> 04:55.760]  This bill was passed, what it is is a federal mandate from the Real ID Act of 2005, which
[04:55.760 --> 04:58.440]  nationalizes the driver's license.
[04:58.440 --> 05:03.840]  It makes it so that it holds our biometric information, real ugly things like that, and
[05:03.840 --> 05:04.840]  that was passed in 2005.
[05:04.840 --> 05:08.880]  Well, the states put up a big fight about it because this is such a violation of the
[05:08.880 --> 05:09.880]  10th Amendment.
[05:09.880 --> 05:15.120]  The federal government is not given the authority to take care of identification.
[05:15.120 --> 05:22.240]  That is something that the states are responsible for, and this legislation federalizes or nationalizes
[05:22.240 --> 05:23.240]  our driver's licenses.
[05:23.240 --> 05:27.600]  So, you know, in 2000, we had an extension because, you know, the states were putting
[05:27.600 --> 05:30.600]  up a fight about it, and we got an extension through 2009.
[05:30.600 --> 05:36.160]  Well, February 1st, 2010, the new director of the Texas Department of Public Safety,
[05:36.160 --> 05:40.480]  Steve McCraw, was testifying in a hearing and said that he was taking steps to become
[05:40.480 --> 05:42.680]  Real ID compliant, and that was over a year ago.
[05:42.680 --> 05:47.120]  So, they've been becoming Real ID compliant through rule, through the Public Safety Commission,
[05:47.120 --> 05:48.120]  is what it is.
[05:48.120 --> 05:53.120]  One of the things that they did through the Public Safety Commission was create a lawful
[05:53.120 --> 05:59.960]  presence rule, and part of SB 9 will give legitimacy to that rule because the department
[05:59.960 --> 06:05.040]  feels like it would be better if they codified it with legislation, is how he put it.
[06:05.040 --> 06:09.920]  Now, SB 9 had a lot of really ugly things in it, including, you know, driver's license
[06:09.920 --> 06:11.960]  and insurance checkpoints.
[06:11.960 --> 06:20.160]  It allowed DPS to test without a warrant, and those are, luckily, we got those provisions
[06:20.160 --> 06:23.880]  pulled because of a demonstration that was done down at the Capitol, a little political
[06:23.880 --> 06:28.720]  theater got the checkpoints bill pulled, and then testimony was given and committee in
[06:28.720 --> 06:33.720]  the Senate, and they pulled the DPS tracking devices, which is a really big win, but ultimately
[06:33.720 --> 06:37.680]  Senate Bill 9 is still a Real ID implementation bill.
[06:37.680 --> 06:41.400]  And so, what we're going to have to do is it's being heard by the House Committee, the
[06:41.400 --> 06:45.320]  Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee, on Tuesday morning at 8.30.
[06:45.320 --> 06:51.720]  Now, that gives us two full business days to make sure that every representative that's
[06:51.720 --> 06:56.400]  on that committee understands that this is a Real ID implementation bill, no ifs and
[06:56.400 --> 07:02.440]  buts about it, and particularly the Republicans, because in their platform on page 10, it says
[07:02.440 --> 07:07.960]  that they are opposed to a national ID card, so I think that as long as we can really put
[07:07.960 --> 07:11.400]  some pressure on them, make sure that they know that it's very clear that this implements
[07:11.400 --> 07:17.040]  Real ID, that this is a violation of the Constitution, and that Texans will not stand for it, I think
[07:17.040 --> 07:19.800]  that we have a great shot at killing this in the House on Tuesday.
[07:19.800 --> 07:23.000]  Okay, so Heather, this is a Senate bill.
[07:23.000 --> 07:25.160]  It has passed out of the Senate already?
[07:25.160 --> 07:30.920]  That's right, it did pass out of the Senate just recently, it was a really quick deal,
[07:30.920 --> 07:35.320]  and then it was referred, and all of a sudden, wham bam, now it's having its committee hearing.
[07:35.320 --> 07:39.640]  So, we are really fortunate to have gotten the 5-Z notice, because there are some ways
[07:39.640 --> 07:43.560]  that they can suspend the rules on the floor, and allow a bill to be heard without giving
[07:43.560 --> 07:44.800]  any public notice.
[07:44.800 --> 07:49.800]  So, I'm really glad that we have this time to prepare for it, we can get people activated,
[07:49.800 --> 07:56.120]  we can be making phone calls, visiting offices on Monday, I actually have meetings with every
[07:56.120 --> 08:01.720]  committee member on Monday, so I'll have 30 minutes with each of their Chiefs of Staff
[08:01.720 --> 08:05.960]  to discuss the implications of this bill to make sure that they are fully aware of what
[08:05.960 --> 08:06.960]  this bill does.
[08:06.960 --> 08:09.560]  Okay, so which committee is this in the House?
[08:09.560 --> 08:14.720]  In the House, this is the Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee, it's chaired
[08:14.720 --> 08:22.080]  by Sid Miller, and I think that they're mostly Republicans, and I think that as long as we
[08:22.080 --> 08:26.800]  get out there and let them know that they are supposed to be adhering to their platform,
[08:26.800 --> 08:33.720]  as well as the laws of the state and the Constitution being the supreme law of the land, and making
[08:33.720 --> 08:37.920]  sure that they know that we know that they are supposed to be opposed to a national ID
[08:37.920 --> 08:42.240]  card, and they need to uphold that, because the people that voted for them in the primaries
[08:42.240 --> 08:46.280]  and in the general election are expecting them to uphold the platform that they took
[08:46.280 --> 08:48.920]  a note of affiliation to.
[08:48.920 --> 08:52.360]  Okay, Heather, is this an appropriations bill?
[08:52.360 --> 08:57.320]  Is the state of Texas, the taxpayers, going to have to pay for this if this bill passes
[08:57.320 --> 08:58.320]  into law?
[08:58.320 --> 08:59.320]  Yes, absolutely.
[08:59.320 --> 09:09.680]  It's going to take $63 million to become compliant with the first 18 benchmarks, which is... and
[09:09.680 --> 09:36.800]  that's what they're looking for, so that we are on our way to stay real ID compliant.
[09:36.800 --> 09:41.560]  He said, this is what the department director said, his name's Steve McCrawl.
[09:41.560 --> 09:46.920]  He was in the FBI for 26 years, and was just recently appointed by Rick Perry.
[09:46.920 --> 09:53.920]  He says that this will allow us to be on a continuing path to be compliant with the Real
[09:53.920 --> 09:59.840]  ID Act, so that our licenses will be allowed to be used for federal purposes, like flying
[09:59.840 --> 10:04.240]  and entering federal buildings, and I think that is an outright threat right there.
[10:04.240 --> 10:08.400]  They're telling us, if we don't comply with their unconstitutional mandate, that they're
[10:08.400 --> 10:16.520]  not going to let us travel freely, and they're not going to let us enter into the noble.
[10:16.520 --> 10:26.040]  Does this bill provide, or mandate, or require biometric data and or RFID shipping in the
[10:26.040 --> 10:27.040]  ID?
[10:27.040 --> 10:28.040]  It does.
[10:28.040 --> 10:34.320]  It allows for the collection and the maintenance of biometric information.
[10:34.320 --> 10:38.680]  One of the things that they said is the reason why it's going to be such an increase in time,
[10:38.680 --> 10:43.680]  which is why they're going to have to create six mega centers throughout Texas for DPS,
[10:43.680 --> 10:47.880]  is because everyone that comes in to have their driver's license renewed from now on,
[10:47.880 --> 10:52.600]  if this passes, will have to have all of their biometrics collected, which includes a facial
[10:52.600 --> 10:55.560]  scan and collection of all of their fingerprints.
[10:55.560 --> 11:06.000]  Now, the RFID is incorporated in the second phase of the benchmarks, so we have sworn
[11:06.000 --> 11:08.200]  that we would comply with it.
[11:08.200 --> 11:15.840]  We have, in writing, confirmed that we would comply with the rest of the benchmarks, technically,
[11:15.840 --> 11:21.280]  the Department of Public Safety has, so we've said that we will be doing this, although
[11:21.280 --> 11:23.560]  we don't have the RFID quite yet.
[11:23.560 --> 11:28.880]  Okay, so Heather, let me just get this straight on a financial level.
[11:28.880 --> 11:38.200]  This is an unfunded federal mandate that is being thrust upon the states, and we as the
[11:38.200 --> 11:43.600]  taxpayers of the states have to pay for this type of slavery, is that correct?
[11:43.600 --> 11:47.880]  Yes, you're exactly right, but they're being good Republicans, and they're not raising
[11:47.880 --> 11:48.880]  taxes.
[11:48.880 --> 11:54.280]  What they're going to do is change our driver's license system to a fee-based revenue system,
[11:54.280 --> 11:59.440]  and they're increasing fees, so they're taxing us without actually having to tax us and increase
[11:59.440 --> 12:00.440]  the budget.
[12:00.440 --> 12:03.760]  What is this fee-based system?
[12:03.760 --> 12:09.800]  It means that their system is going to be entirely operational under the fees that they
[12:09.800 --> 12:13.480]  collect from driver's license applicants.
[12:13.480 --> 12:19.360]  They're raising fees on things like obtaining a driver's record is going to be twice as
[12:19.360 --> 12:20.800]  much as it used to be.
[12:20.800 --> 12:26.320]  They're increasing the driver's license fee by $1.33, which doesn't sound like a lot,
[12:26.320 --> 12:33.960]  but we're only paying $4 now, so that's a huge increase, over 26% jump in the price
[12:33.960 --> 12:37.960]  to renew your driver's license, and then it's to get it reinstated.
[12:37.960 --> 12:45.120]  What he said during testimony was that the DPS employees were getting confused and weren't
[12:45.120 --> 12:50.040]  sure how much the charge, sometimes it's $100, sometimes it's $125, but they're just going
[12:50.040 --> 12:56.760]  to go ahead and flatten that out to even $125, so that the employees aren't confused anymore.
[12:56.760 --> 13:03.160]  Heather, can you tell us about the fiscal note of this bill?
[13:03.160 --> 13:08.000]  Is there any kind of evening out, does it say anything in the fiscal note concerning
[13:08.000 --> 13:12.840]  the federal funding as far as what's coming in from the feds and what's going back to
[13:12.840 --> 13:13.840]  the feds?
[13:13.840 --> 13:20.520]  Is any of that on record at all, or is this just whatever's on paper is strictly, we're
[13:20.520 --> 13:28.160]  going to have to pay for it, and it all goes to the feds and the state of Texas?
[13:28.160 --> 13:30.320]  Can you break down the fiscal note for us?
[13:30.320 --> 13:34.720]  Well, you know, I don't know all the details of the fiscal note, but I do know that during
[13:34.720 --> 13:39.280]  testimony they said nothing of getting federal money for this.
[13:39.280 --> 13:44.040]  They said that they anticipate the fiscal note is actually a negative one, because since
[13:44.040 --> 13:49.920]  they're using fees, they don't have to include that into the implication on the budget.
[13:49.920 --> 13:55.600]  So what they're doing is they're Shanghai-ing it, so they're making it look good, like we're
[13:55.600 --> 13:59.600]  revamping the system, it's going to cost us less money, we're going to take less money
[13:59.600 --> 14:05.360]  out of the general revenue account, and then we're going to be able to be real I.D. compliant
[14:05.360 --> 14:11.600]  so that Texans are still, so that daddy still lets Texans fly.
[14:11.600 --> 14:12.600]  All right.
[14:12.600 --> 14:16.160]  Who is in control in this committee?
[14:16.160 --> 14:19.280]  I'm sorry, go ahead, Randy.
[14:19.280 --> 14:27.920]  You said that, we said we would comply with RIFD, who is we?
[14:27.920 --> 14:31.320]  That is an excellent question, and I'm glad you called me out on that, because I certainly
[14:31.320 --> 14:35.280]  didn't say that I was going to comply, I don't think any of y'all did either.
[14:35.280 --> 14:42.240]  The Texas DPS has agreed to comply, and that is through the director, his name is Stephen
[14:42.240 --> 14:49.520]  McCraw, and like I said before, he is fresh out of the FBI after 26 years, so he's pretty
[14:49.520 --> 14:56.080]  much here to execute the federal government plan with us with regard to DPS and law enforcement
[14:56.080 --> 14:57.080]  in Texas.
[14:57.080 --> 15:08.440]  A question then, where does McCraw get authority to commit one of Texas agencies to any foreign
[15:08.440 --> 15:11.200]  imposed requirements?
[15:11.200 --> 15:15.560]  I think that that is a damn good question, and that is on my list of questions to ask
[15:15.560 --> 15:18.440]  during my testimony at the Capitol on Tuesday.
[15:18.440 --> 15:22.480]  I want to know where he gets the authority to do this, because they started becoming
[15:22.480 --> 15:27.560]  real IC compliant by way of rules they were passing through the Public Safety Commission,
[15:27.560 --> 15:31.240]  and they're already doing these things, and now they're coming back and asking for the
[15:31.240 --> 15:32.520]  legislative backing.
[15:32.520 --> 15:36.480]  I want to know where he thinks he gets the authority also, and I'm going to be asking
[15:36.480 --> 15:41.040]  him and calling him out at the committee hearing on Tuesday.
[15:41.040 --> 15:44.280]  I have another relate, go ahead Randy.
[15:44.280 --> 15:50.200]  So in effect, they have passed rules that are not in compliance with standing statutory
[15:50.200 --> 15:55.840]  requirements, and now they're asking for statutes to support the rules that have already put
[15:55.840 --> 15:56.840]  in place.
[15:56.840 --> 15:57.840]  Correct.
[15:57.840 --> 16:02.840]  What they said is that the department thinks it would be better if the rule was codified
[16:02.840 --> 16:03.840]  by legislation.
[16:03.840 --> 16:10.960]  Oh, they think it would be better if the rule was codified by legislation.
[16:10.960 --> 16:17.240]  You know what, our butts may be covered a little better if we had some law, some rule
[16:17.240 --> 16:20.640]  of law to justify our tyranny.
[16:20.640 --> 16:23.080]  Yeah, absolutely.
[16:23.080 --> 16:28.360]  They've already been asking unlawfully and have already begun the unlawful implementation
[16:28.360 --> 16:31.480]  of real ID, and he needs to be held accountable for this.
[16:31.480 --> 16:36.240]  Well, here's another question, Heather, that I would like you to ask or I may ask in the
[16:36.240 --> 16:37.360]  committee hearing.
[16:37.360 --> 16:47.400]  I want to know what statute authorizes any state public servant or representative of
[16:47.400 --> 16:53.760]  any state agency to take federal funding or any funding from any foreign entity whatsoever.
[16:53.760 --> 16:58.080]  Because you know what, if one of us offered money for a policy, that would be considered
[16:58.080 --> 16:59.080]  a bribe.
[16:59.080 --> 17:00.960]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.960 --> 17:05.320]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin
[17:05.320 --> 17:07.720]  supplies in the Austin metro area.
[17:07.720 --> 17:08.720]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:08.720 --> 17:13.360]  We're a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:13.360 --> 17:14.360]  and metals purchases.
[17:14.360 --> 17:19.240]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and
[17:19.240 --> 17:20.240]  bigger location.
[17:20.240 --> 17:27.000]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[17:27.000 --> 17:28.000]  location.
[17:28.000 --> 17:31.880]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground
[17:31.880 --> 17:35.640]  of the floor, next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:35.640 --> 17:39.440]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[17:39.440 --> 17:45.600]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[17:45.600 --> 17:50.040]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty
[17:50.040 --> 17:51.040]  Radio.
[17:51.040 --> 17:56.560]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A or call
[17:56.560 --> 18:00.520]  512-646-6440.
[18:00.520 --> 18:05.800]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.800 --> 18:09.280]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.280 --> 18:13.600]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.600 --> 18:14.600]  can win too.
[18:14.600 --> 18:19.440]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.440 --> 18:25.320]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.320 --> 18:29.840]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:29.840 --> 18:34.080]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.080 --> 18:39.200]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.200 --> 18:41.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.120 --> 18:46.860]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.860 --> 18:49.880]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 18:58.840]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.840 --> 18:59.840]  collectors now.
[19:28.840 --> 19:58.400]  We see justice, justice is the goal, justice, life and liberty, freedom.
[19:59.320 --> 20:03.120]  That is what we are about here.
[20:03.120 --> 20:08.400]  We're about the pursuit of life, liberty, happiness, the Holy Spirit, John Jehovah has
[20:08.400 --> 20:13.920]  given this to us, he is righteousness and justice and we're not going to put up with
[20:13.920 --> 20:14.920]  this anymore.
[20:14.920 --> 20:21.560]  Okay, so we've got this bill, Senate Bill 9, somehow it has sleazed its way through
[20:21.560 --> 20:28.280]  the Senate and now it's in front of the House Homeland Security Committee.
[20:28.280 --> 20:33.520]  I don't even think there should be such a committee, all right, at any rate, Heather,
[20:33.520 --> 20:35.600]  tell us what can we do?
[20:35.600 --> 20:42.360]  Tuesday is the committee hearing, who can we call, what kind of documents can we fill
[20:42.360 --> 20:48.640]  out and send where, what can we do to stop this and voice our opinion on this?
[20:48.640 --> 20:51.360]  Well, there's a lot we can do.
[20:51.360 --> 20:56.440]  Starting on Monday, we're going to need phone calls, we're going to need emails and most
[20:56.440 --> 21:00.920]  importantly if you're here in the Austin area, come down to the Capitol and then we're going
[21:00.920 --> 21:05.320]  to have a list on tagtexas.org is the website for Texans for Accountable Government and
[21:05.320 --> 21:09.560]  also check out our Facebook page, Texans for Accountable Government, we post all of this
[21:09.560 --> 21:10.560]  information on there.
[21:10.560 --> 21:15.680]  It's going to have the names, the email addresses, the phone numbers and the room numbers for
[21:15.680 --> 21:17.360]  all of the committee members.
[21:17.360 --> 21:22.120]  We want to make sure that they know that we know that SB 9 is a real IP implementation
[21:22.120 --> 21:24.560]  bill and that we're not going to stand for it.
[21:24.560 --> 21:29.240]  So Monday is when we need phone calls, emails and if you're in Austin to come to the Capitol.
[21:29.240 --> 21:34.120]  If you've never done it before, meet us in the cafe at noon and we'll give you a map
[21:34.120 --> 21:39.080]  and show you exactly how to do it and give you some information for you to go in.
[21:39.080 --> 21:43.800]  What we can do is go to the committee offices and fill out something called a green card.
[21:43.800 --> 21:47.520]  It's much like going to a committee hearing and filling out a witness affirmation form
[21:47.520 --> 21:50.400]  and you know you don't have to speak, you can just submit the card.
[21:50.400 --> 21:52.280]  Well, it's the same in the offices.
[21:52.280 --> 21:55.800]  You can fill out your comments, your name, your address, you give it to the aide and
[21:55.800 --> 22:01.080]  it goes on the record that you were there on that day at that time in opposition to
[22:01.080 --> 22:03.880]  this bill and to let the representatives know that.
[22:03.880 --> 22:05.800]  So that's what we're going to do on Monday.
[22:05.800 --> 22:11.200]  Like I said before, I have a hearing, I'm sorry, a meeting with every committee member
[22:11.200 --> 22:15.520]  and so I'll be meeting with them to make sure that it is official that they know where they
[22:15.520 --> 22:16.520]  can find this information.
[22:16.520 --> 22:21.040]  I'm going to give them the link and you know the timing in the testimony where they can
[22:21.040 --> 22:25.400]  find him talking about biometric information, where they can find him on the record saying
[22:25.400 --> 22:29.720]  that this brings Texas into compliance with real ID.
[22:29.720 --> 22:31.440]  So that's what we're going to be doing Monday.
[22:31.440 --> 22:37.040]  On Tuesday, the committee hearing, it's the Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee
[22:37.040 --> 22:41.880]  and they're meeting at 8.30 on Tuesday morning in the extension building and like I said
[22:41.880 --> 22:47.360]  before, all of this information will be up on PAGTexas.org very soon as well as the Texans
[22:47.360 --> 22:50.200]  for Accountable Government Facebook page.
[22:50.200 --> 22:54.720]  That's awesome Heather and I have one, I have a couple more questions for you because you
[22:54.720 --> 22:59.560]  know I always got to get to the bottom of this and who's responsible, who is the main
[22:59.560 --> 23:00.560]  perp?
[23:00.560 --> 23:07.200]  Well his name is Representative Tommy Williams, he's from Woodlands which is Montgomery County
[23:07.200 --> 23:12.920]  which is known for being just so corrupt and he just exudes that in committee.
[23:12.920 --> 23:16.800]  When you just look at him, he gets red faced when you talk against his bills because we
[23:16.800 --> 23:20.560]  were there to testify last time and we got him to pull a lot of stuff which was really
[23:20.560 --> 23:21.560]  great.
[23:21.560 --> 23:24.800]  There were a lot of really ugly provisions that are not in the bill anymore but you know
[23:24.800 --> 23:32.040]  the bottom line is that this is real ID and him and four other senators have sponsored
[23:32.040 --> 23:33.040]  this bill.
[23:33.040 --> 23:37.880]  So there's really not that much support for it, it's not like he has all of the Senate
[23:37.880 --> 23:40.680]  or and he doesn't have any of the House.
[23:40.680 --> 23:47.000]  So this is a very good, a good thing that's happening that we can you know go and preempt
[23:47.000 --> 23:50.880]  this bill before it gets heard by committee, make sure that they know that we know what's
[23:50.880 --> 23:55.120]  going on and that we will be there on Monday and we'll be there on Tuesday to make sure
[23:55.120 --> 23:56.880]  that they know it.
[23:56.880 --> 24:04.640]  And I just want to testify concerning my experience in these committee hearings and I don't know,
[24:04.640 --> 24:10.560]  I can't speak for the hearts of these representatives, who knows they may have been totally faking
[24:10.560 --> 24:18.160]  it but I know what I felt, what I experienced when I got up at that podium and said what
[24:18.160 --> 24:24.080]  I have to say with my research and my feelings and my experience and I looked each one of
[24:24.080 --> 24:29.560]  these people in the eye, I'm telling you it was real, all right.
[24:29.560 --> 24:38.520]  We do have an influence, we do have power when we get in there and talk to these people
[24:38.520 --> 24:42.000]  especially on the record in these committee hearings.
[24:42.000 --> 24:47.760]  In my opinion getting up and speaking in the committee hearings is more powerful than voting.
[24:47.760 --> 24:51.520]  I'm telling you these people looked at me, I looked at them.
[24:51.520 --> 24:55.680]  We saw each other's hearts, that doesn't mean they're going to agree with me or do what
[24:55.680 --> 25:07.840]  we want but I feel that is a very important way, a sincere way that we can have some say
[25:07.840 --> 25:10.520]  in what goes on in our legislature.
[25:10.520 --> 25:16.600]  Yes, you know Deborah you're absolutely right and that's why one of the platforms of Texas
[25:16.600 --> 25:22.440]  for Accountable Government is humanizing and making sure that our local representatives
[25:22.440 --> 25:28.880]  and that our law enforcement know who we are and we've gotten with them on a human level,
[25:28.880 --> 25:33.880]  that they know that we are coming from a place of love and of freedom and of loving liberty
[25:33.880 --> 25:38.480]  and that we are not backing down because we have that, that is our motivation.
[25:38.480 --> 25:42.280]  It has nothing to do with gaining power, it has nothing to do with making anybody money,
[25:42.280 --> 25:46.880]  it is about being free and that is one of the most powerful things that you can do is
[25:46.880 --> 25:51.440]  really for somebody on that human level and let them know how you're feeling.
[25:51.440 --> 25:53.600]  Well Heather I wanted to ask you something else.
[25:53.600 --> 26:00.040]  You and I have been together in these committee hearings sometimes till 2 o'clock in the morning.
[26:00.040 --> 26:04.640]  I mean maybe I'm naive, maybe I'm wearing my heart on my sleeve and I know I am but
[26:04.640 --> 26:12.440]  I just don't think from a logical, emotional and emotional standpoint that these committee
[26:12.440 --> 26:20.440]  members would sit there till 2 o'clock in the morning listening to us if they didn't
[26:20.440 --> 26:21.440]  care.
[26:21.440 --> 26:25.800]  I don't see that as grandstanding, I see that as sincerity.
[26:25.800 --> 26:28.360]  Heather what is your feelings on that?
[26:28.360 --> 26:33.040]  Yeah you know I know what committee you're talking about specifically when we were hearing
[26:33.040 --> 26:34.040]  sobriety checkpoints.
[26:34.040 --> 26:38.880]  That was a really great hearing because I think that we did connect with that committee
[26:38.880 --> 26:43.160]  and let them know where we were coming from and you know they understood that it's law
[26:43.160 --> 26:47.680]  enforcement coming in and lobbying for more power and when we're up there talking about
[26:47.680 --> 26:53.440]  our families and you know why this is important to us as human beings that it really does
[26:53.440 --> 26:56.760]  connect with a lot of them and we have to remember that these are just people, they
[26:56.760 --> 27:02.920]  really are just people and a lot of the problem is that special interests, the special interests
[27:02.920 --> 27:03.920]  own the media right?
[27:03.920 --> 27:08.080]  We kind of understand that the mainstream media and so if the special interests are
[27:08.080 --> 27:12.800]  the only ones showing up to their offices and to these committee hearings and then they
[27:12.800 --> 27:18.080]  are reinforced by their constituency who is you know driven by what they perceive through
[27:18.080 --> 27:23.040]  the media then they're only doing what they think that they're supposed to be doing.
[27:23.040 --> 27:26.760]  Not to say that all of them are, don't get me wrong I know that there are deals going
[27:26.760 --> 27:30.800]  on but a lot of these people are just human beings and they're just doing what they think
[27:30.800 --> 27:31.800]  that is right.
[27:31.800 --> 27:35.680]  Granted they're all status and they think that the states have solved the problem but
[27:35.680 --> 27:39.800]  that's a philosophical thing that we have to start you know chipping away at by running
[27:39.800 --> 27:43.960]  more libertarian candidates by showing up to these committee hearings and giving them
[27:43.960 --> 27:46.640]  a different perspective on these bills.
[27:46.640 --> 27:51.320]  All of these are ways that we can influence policy here in Texas and we are absolutely
[27:51.320 --> 27:55.600]  winning just by I was at the Ron Paul debate last night and seeing all of those new faces
[27:55.600 --> 28:00.920]  and the faces from before I am invigorated on this revolution because it's happening
[28:00.920 --> 28:01.920]  right now.
[28:01.920 --> 28:04.480]  More people are waking up, more people are getting involved and they're deciding that
[28:04.480 --> 28:07.520]  they're not going to take it anymore and they're going to do something about it and it's a
[28:07.520 --> 28:10.520]  beautiful thing.
[28:10.520 --> 28:16.160]  Heather you've truly given us some hope and we have hope and I really thank you for coming
[28:16.160 --> 28:19.120]  on and discussing this with you.
[28:19.120 --> 28:26.440]  With us please tell us the information again about what people can do to stop this bill
[28:26.440 --> 28:28.560]  and give us your website again.
[28:28.560 --> 28:31.640]  Definitely Monday is when we're going to have our lobby day.
[28:31.640 --> 28:35.040]  If you've never done it before come at noon and meet us in the cafe.
[28:35.040 --> 28:37.040]  You'll see the group of activists there.
[28:37.040 --> 28:40.560]  I'm sure some people will have signs and then Tuesday is the committee hearing.
[28:40.560 --> 28:41.560]  Please come down.
[28:41.560 --> 28:45.520]  If you don't feel like testifying or if you have to just come before work please do so.
[28:45.520 --> 28:50.200]  You can come and fill out a witness affirmation card, drop it and get your opinion registered
[28:50.200 --> 28:55.440]  on the official record that you're opposed to a real ID implementation here in Texas.
[28:55.440 --> 29:01.960]  The website is PAGTexas.org, it's Texans for Accountable Government on Facebook and please
[29:01.960 --> 29:07.520]  do follow us and keep up because the revolution is within our grasp as long as we stay active
[29:07.520 --> 29:10.280]  and vigilant.
[29:10.280 --> 29:11.280]  Thank you so much Heather.
[29:11.280 --> 29:12.280]  We really appreciate it.
[29:12.280 --> 29:13.280]  Thanks for having me.
[29:13.280 --> 29:14.280]  Have a good night.
[29:14.280 --> 29:15.280]  All right.
[29:15.280 --> 29:16.280]  Good night.
[29:16.280 --> 29:23.280]  PAGTexas.org, that's Heather Fazio and folks make sure you go to that website and get to
[29:23.280 --> 29:25.280]  that committee hearing.
[29:25.280 --> 29:32.360]  Even if you're not there to speak make sure you're there at some point in the morning
[29:32.360 --> 29:43.280]  this coming Tuesday to fill out a form, fill out the affidavit that's this Tuesday, May
[29:43.280 --> 29:49.960]  10th to stop this implementation of the Real ID Act.
[29:49.960 --> 30:00.000]  We'll be right back folks if you want to call in 512-646-1984.
[30:00.000 --> 30:01.000]  I lost my son.
[30:01.000 --> 30:02.000]  My nephew.
[30:02.000 --> 30:03.000]  My uncle.
[30:03.000 --> 30:04.000]  My son.
[30:04.000 --> 30:05.000]  On September 11th, 2001.
[30:05.000 --> 30:08.160]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[30:08.160 --> 30:12.360]  World Trade Center 7, a 47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[30:12.360 --> 30:18.240]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[30:18.240 --> 30:22.000]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[30:22.000 --> 30:25.120]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[30:25.120 --> 30:27.360]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[30:27.360 --> 30:32.440]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[30:32.440 --> 30:36.320]  Cash used to be king but now could it land you in jail?
[30:36.320 --> 30:39.440]  Several countries including the US are clamping down on paper money.
[30:39.440 --> 30:45.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you about the attack on cash in just a moment.
[30:45.280 --> 30:46.880]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:46.880 --> 30:50.480]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:50.480 --> 30:55.240]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:55.240 --> 31:00.320]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:00.320 --> 31:03.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[31:03.000 --> 31:07.300]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[31:07.300 --> 31:10.840]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:10.840 --> 31:14.400]  Start over with Startpage.
[31:14.400 --> 31:15.960]  Could cash disappear?
[31:15.960 --> 31:20.440]  The US already jails citizens for large unreported cash transactions.
[31:20.440 --> 31:25.160]  Mexico wants to outlaw cash purchases of real estate and high dollar items.
[31:25.160 --> 31:31.760]  Spend 1,500 euros in Greece or 5,000 euros in Italy as of 2011 and risk prison.
[31:31.760 --> 31:33.880]  Cash and civil liberties are inseparable.
[31:33.880 --> 31:37.880]  In a cashless society, bureaucrats can control how you spend your money, and that could have
[31:37.880 --> 31:39.600]  a chewing effect on freedom.
[31:39.600 --> 31:42.640]  Dissenters could one day wake up to zero bank balances.
[31:42.640 --> 31:46.920]  Unpopular groups could become penniless, and the overweight might be limited to fat-free
[31:46.920 --> 31:47.920]  foods.
[31:47.920 --> 31:50.360]  So let's all use cash and fight to preserve it.
[31:50.360 --> 31:51.920]  Our freedom depends on it.
[31:51.920 --> 31:53.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:53.480 --> 32:04.160]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:04.160 --> 32:24.080]  Cheers.
[32:34.160 --> 32:36.160]  to prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[32:36.160 --> 32:38.160]  Them murderers are liars, them tellers.
[32:38.160 --> 32:41.160]  Them are liars, they tell sick stories.
[32:41.160 --> 32:43.160]  I don't believe what they're telling me.
[32:43.160 --> 32:46.160]  3% of Americans vote for Bush.
[32:46.160 --> 32:48.160]  So how the hell did he get the presidency?
[32:48.160 --> 32:51.160]  That's why I have a warrant for him.
[32:51.160 --> 32:53.160]  Everybody listen carefully.
[32:53.160 --> 32:55.160]  Listen to the words of the fish who's passing.
[32:55.160 --> 33:00.160]  This is a rest from Mr. Bush.
[33:00.160 --> 33:04.160]  I have a warrant for him.
[33:04.160 --> 33:09.160]  This is a rest from Mr. Bush.
[33:09.160 --> 33:14.160]  I have a warrant for him.
[33:14.160 --> 33:16.160]  Well, we're not forgetting homes for you.
[33:16.160 --> 33:18.160]  Warrant for him.
[33:18.160 --> 33:20.160]  All right, we are back.
[33:20.160 --> 33:23.160]  RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[33:23.160 --> 33:25.160]  We're taking your calls.
[33:25.160 --> 33:30.160]  512-646-1984.
[33:30.160 --> 33:33.160]  Guy from Arkansas is on topic.
[33:33.160 --> 33:38.160]  Guy, what is your question or comment concerning this topic?
[33:38.160 --> 33:40.160]  Yes, good evening, folks.
[33:40.160 --> 33:42.160]  Always glad to hear you.
[33:42.160 --> 33:46.160]  I know the world is still sane when you guys are out in the air.
[33:46.160 --> 33:55.160]  Quite honestly, the answer to this problem is simply is Sheriff Mack's lawsuit,
[33:55.160 --> 34:02.160]  which was against the Supreme Court holding that the Fed cannot force mandates,
[34:02.160 --> 34:08.160]  unfederally funded mandates upon the states where the states have to pick up the tab.
[34:08.160 --> 34:16.160]  So you file a lawsuit using Mack's lawsuit as a binder, and you let it ride.
[34:16.160 --> 34:18.160]  And you shut it down that way.
[34:18.160 --> 34:32.160]  Also, Ralph Winter Road has come across that all these unfunded mandates are really not substantiated by law.
[34:32.160 --> 34:33.160]  They are interpretive.
[34:33.160 --> 34:40.160]  And if it's an interpretive law or a statute, then it cannot be backed up by law.
[34:40.160 --> 34:44.160]  So that was basically my point for tonight.
[34:44.160 --> 34:48.160]  And I'll just let you all take that and ride with it.
[34:48.160 --> 34:51.160]  But I think Mack's case is the holding.
[34:51.160 --> 34:53.160]  That's the one that you've got to use.
[34:53.160 --> 34:55.160]  Well, Guy, you have an excellent point.
[34:55.160 --> 35:04.160]  And this is an issue that I have been raising for a long time concerning these state agencies
[35:04.160 --> 35:08.160]  and public servants that are taking federal funds.
[35:08.160 --> 35:19.160]  I haven't found any statute in state law that authorizes them to accept federal funds.
[35:19.160 --> 35:26.160]  The only statute I've found authorizes them to accept funds from the state comptroller,
[35:26.160 --> 35:31.160]  from the state treasury, from state taxes.
[35:31.160 --> 35:34.160]  And the situation is this.
[35:34.160 --> 35:43.160]  If you or I or anyone else went to the police chief of Austin or the head of the DOT,
[35:43.160 --> 35:50.160]  the Department of Transportation or whatever else here or any other agency in Texas,
[35:50.160 --> 35:57.160]  and offered funds to implement a policy, that would be considered bribery.
[35:57.160 --> 36:04.160]  And now we're talking about a foreign entity offering funds to implement a policy.
[36:04.160 --> 36:13.160]  I don't see the statutory authority to authorize this situation.
[36:13.160 --> 36:17.160]  Randy, do you have comments on this?
[36:17.160 --> 36:19.160]  We've discussed this before.
[36:19.160 --> 36:28.160]  And I can't understand how they can do this other than just through capitulation.
[36:28.160 --> 36:31.160]  Nobody raises the issue.
[36:31.160 --> 36:34.160]  So it may well be time that we raise the issue.
[36:34.160 --> 36:38.160]  We have a director, the DPS, who's an ex-FBI agent.
[36:38.160 --> 36:41.160]  He may be the perfect one to accuse of bribery,
[36:41.160 --> 36:46.160]  of acting in concert and collusion with his former employers.
[36:46.160 --> 36:53.160]  Well, Randy, apart from criminal charges, let's talk about civil.
[36:53.160 --> 36:55.160]  Let's talk about lawsuits.
[36:55.160 --> 37:01.160]  Who would have standing to sue the directors or the heads of these agencies
[37:01.160 --> 37:05.160]  or whoever is actually authorizing and writing on the paper
[37:05.160 --> 37:10.160]  and signing their name to take the check from the federal government?
[37:10.160 --> 37:16.160]  Who would have standing to sue based on damages?
[37:16.160 --> 37:18.160]  That's a good question.
[37:18.160 --> 37:25.160]  And I'm thinking quite ham, but it really doesn't fall under quite ham.
[37:25.160 --> 37:29.160]  Well, if I can, while he's thinking about it, to address Guy's issue,
[37:29.160 --> 37:34.160]  not to try to throw cold water on anything, but in Sheriff Mack's case,
[37:34.160 --> 37:39.160]  he was the agency that was trying to be preempted by the federal government.
[37:39.160 --> 37:41.160]  That gave him standing.
[37:41.160 --> 37:44.160]  So he was able to combat it from that perspective.
[37:44.160 --> 37:49.160]  And his was the agency that was being commandeered.
[37:49.160 --> 37:50.160]  Yes.
[37:50.160 --> 37:57.160]  And the difference in Sheriff Mack's case is that there was no state statute involved.
[37:57.160 --> 38:03.160]  It was strictly a federal mandate straight to the sheriff's office.
[38:03.160 --> 38:12.160]  And so now we have a problem if the state passes a law of an appropriations bill.
[38:12.160 --> 38:18.160]  I don't see how we can bring in Sheriff Mack's claim as a precedent.
[38:18.160 --> 38:23.160]  Well, if the state passes an appropriations bill, that's state money.
[38:23.160 --> 38:27.160]  That's not federal money.
[38:27.160 --> 38:37.160]  So at this point, the director has implemented rules that are in violation of statute.
[38:37.160 --> 38:39.160]  But how do I get standing?
[38:39.160 --> 38:43.160]  There is case law that you don't have to wait till you're harmed
[38:43.160 --> 38:50.160]  by something that is certain to harm you.
[38:50.160 --> 38:53.160]  I'll have to take some research.
[38:53.160 --> 38:56.160]  But the best way to go for this one, I would suspect,
[38:56.160 --> 38:59.160]  would be to go right for the head of the snake.
[38:59.160 --> 39:09.160]  And since he's an FBI agent, he would be a good one to accuse of bribery.
[39:09.160 --> 39:11.160]  I would go with that.
[39:11.160 --> 39:16.160]  I'd have to figure out how it comes back to me personally.
[39:16.160 --> 39:19.160]  Look, bottom line is this.
[39:19.160 --> 39:23.160]  We may not be able to come up with a civil cause of action.
[39:23.160 --> 39:36.160]  But if there is no state statute that authorizes these public servants to accept federal funds, it's not legal.
[39:36.160 --> 39:45.160]  We need a private attorney general action suit to right a civil wrong for injunctive relief.
[39:45.160 --> 39:46.160]  That we can do.
[39:46.160 --> 39:48.160]  We don't have to have standing.
[39:48.160 --> 39:51.160]  Oh, there you go.
[39:51.160 --> 39:53.160]  Injunctive relief.
[39:53.160 --> 40:01.160]  You know what, Randy, I would like you to explain some about this concerning injunctive relief.
[40:01.160 --> 40:09.160]  When you're going for injunctive relief, you can go a lot further than if you're asking for damages.
[40:09.160 --> 40:12.160]  Can you please explain on that, extrapolate on that?
[40:12.160 --> 40:28.160]  Yes, we go in and claim that the Department of Public Safety through its director is conspiring to commit bribery by accepting bribes from a foreign government.
[40:28.160 --> 40:36.160]  And if you sue for monetary relief, then you get into issues of immunity.
[40:36.160 --> 40:53.160]  But if you sue for injunctive relief for an order from the court ordering them to cease and desist in some action, that doesn't, for that no governmental entity has immunity.
[40:53.160 --> 40:55.160]  So that will pull us straight into the court.
[40:55.160 --> 40:59.160]  The only other issue that we will be standing.
[40:59.160 --> 41:15.160]  And if we sue for the purpose of protecting ourselves and all others similarly situated who are at imminent risk of being harmed by the activity, that should give us standing to bring them into the court and get the issue aired.
[41:15.160 --> 41:30.160]  If we did that in this session and ask for preliminary injunction until the issue could be heard in court, we might stop it at least in this session.
[41:30.160 --> 41:32.160]  So Eddie, you want to write that suit up for me in the morning?
[41:32.160 --> 41:36.160]  Yeah, I'll see what I can do. It should take me more than half an hour.
[41:36.160 --> 41:40.160]  Yeah, I figured you could. It won't take long.
[41:40.160 --> 41:42.160]  You're not busy anyway.
[41:42.160 --> 41:45.160]  Yeah, that's true.
[41:45.160 --> 41:50.160]  But that looks like, I mean, that's an approach. It's one we haven't taken.
[41:50.160 --> 41:53.160]  We tend to be reactive.
[41:53.160 --> 42:03.160]  This would be a nice proactive approach to take and not one taken by one of these supposed
[42:03.160 --> 42:13.160]  outfits that are out there to protect the public like, I hate to mention names like ACLU and such, but who tend to file these suits
[42:13.160 --> 42:20.160]  and then do nothing so that the issue goes away and never gets adjudicated and the government gets to continue doing what they're doing.
[42:20.160 --> 42:35.160]  If they have someone who is not in any way backed by these government agencies and not in bed with them, we are likely to have more influence
[42:35.160 --> 42:40.160]  and more effect.
[42:40.160 --> 42:53.160]  So maybe we should put out a call, an attorney out there maybe who's willing to write one anonymously.
[42:53.160 --> 43:00.160]  If you're listening, email us. Let us know if you're willing to help us support an issue of this nature.
[43:00.160 --> 43:04.160]  And we can see about putting something together.
[43:04.160 --> 43:11.160]  Eddie and I are both buried. Frankly, we stay that way. But if we can find people to help fill in these gaps,
[43:11.160 --> 43:15.160]  we may be able to put something together and get them into court.
[43:15.160 --> 43:20.160]  At least stop them in the short term.
[43:20.160 --> 43:28.160]  Now we have, okay, guys gone. That's my story. You have anything else on this, Eddie?
[43:28.160 --> 43:36.160]  Not on this subject, no, but I do have something I would like to share with y'all when we get back after the break.
[43:36.160 --> 43:41.160]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[43:41.160 --> 43:48.160]  We're about to go to break. The phone lines are open. 512-646-1984.
[43:48.160 --> 43:52.160]  This is our four hour marathon. Get on the board early.
[43:52.160 --> 43:57.160]  Don't wait till the last minute because we always hate it when we can't get to someone.
[43:57.160 --> 44:00.160]  We'll be right back.
[44:28.160 --> 44:31.160]  Adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component.
[44:31.160 --> 44:37.160]  And organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[44:37.160 --> 44:41.160]  Plus, centrician tastes great in just water.
[44:41.160 --> 44:47.160]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[44:47.160 --> 44:55.160]  Visit centrician.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[44:55.160 --> 45:00.160]  After you use centrician, you'll believe in supplements again.
[45:00.160 --> 45:06.160]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy,
[45:06.160 --> 45:09.160]  and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[45:09.160 --> 45:12.160]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[45:12.160 --> 45:13.160]  Brave New Books?
[45:13.160 --> 45:20.160]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[45:20.160 --> 45:24.160]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[45:24.160 --> 45:27.160]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[45:27.160 --> 45:32.160]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[45:32.160 --> 45:36.160]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[45:36.160 --> 45:44.160]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility, just behind the bookstore.
[45:44.160 --> 45:47.160]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[45:47.160 --> 45:56.160]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays, so get them a call at 512-480-2503,
[45:56.160 --> 46:24.160]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[46:24.160 --> 46:40.160]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:40.160 --> 46:44.160]  This is Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens.
[46:44.160 --> 46:49.160]  We currently have open phone lines, but before we go to the next caller,
[46:49.160 --> 46:54.160]  there is something I would like to present that I spent some researching time on today
[46:54.160 --> 46:58.160]  in writing up a legal argument for.
[46:58.160 --> 47:04.160]  And if this argument pans out the way that it appears as it should,
[47:04.160 --> 47:11.160]  there's a very good chance that we can nullify any and all tickets and convictions
[47:11.160 --> 47:17.160]  regarding failure to maintain financial responsibility.
[47:17.160 --> 47:19.160]  Here's how it goes.
[47:19.160 --> 47:25.160]  Chapter 601 of the Transportation Code is where the codification for the
[47:25.160 --> 47:31.160]  Failure to Maintain Financial Responsibility Act exists in the Transportation Code.
[47:31.160 --> 47:38.160]  Now, in that chapter, there is this little section, 601.053,
[47:38.160 --> 47:43.160]  and it is titled Evidence of Financial Responsibility.
[47:43.160 --> 47:47.160]  I want you to pay close attention to subsection A here.
[47:47.160 --> 47:56.160]  As a condition of operating in this state a motor vehicle to which section 601.051 applies,
[47:56.160 --> 48:02.160]  the operator of the vehicle on request shall provide to a peace officer,
[48:02.160 --> 48:07.160]  as defined by Article 2.12 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[48:07.160 --> 48:14.160]  or a person involved in an accident with the operator evidence of financial responsibility
[48:14.160 --> 48:20.160]  by exhibiting, one, a motor vehicle liability insurance policy
[48:20.160 --> 48:27.160]  covering the vehicle that satisfies subchapter D or a photocopy of the policy,
[48:27.160 --> 48:33.160]  two, a standard proof of motor vehicle liability insurance form prescribed
[48:33.160 --> 48:38.160]  by the Texas Department of Insurance under section 601.081
[48:38.160 --> 48:44.160]  and issued by a liability insurer for the motor vehicle,
[48:44.160 --> 48:52.160]  three, an insurance binder that confirms the operator is in compliance with this chapter,
[48:52.160 --> 49:00.160]  four, a surety bond certificate issued under section 601.121,
[49:00.160 --> 49:06.160]  five, a certificate of a deposit with the comptroller covering the vehicle
[49:06.160 --> 49:11.160]  issued under section 601.122,
[49:11.160 --> 49:18.160]  six, a copy of a certificate of a deposit with the appropriate county judge
[49:18.160 --> 49:23.160]  covering the vehicle issued under section 601.123,
[49:23.160 --> 49:32.160]  four, seven, a certificate of self-insurance covering the vehicle issued under section 601.124
[49:32.160 --> 49:35.160]  or a photocopy of the certificate.
[49:35.160 --> 49:43.160]  Now, notice that subsection A is requiring that the individual
[49:43.160 --> 49:53.160]  reduce some form of evidence that they are not guilty of not having insurance.
[49:53.160 --> 50:01.160]  Then we get to subsection B, which makes it an absolute requirement
[50:01.160 --> 50:07.160]  that the burden of proof be shifted from the prosecution in a case of failure
[50:07.160 --> 50:10.160]  to maintain financial responsibility
[50:10.160 --> 50:14.160]  directly to the shoulders of the person being accused.
[50:14.160 --> 50:17.160]  Let's see what B says.
[50:17.160 --> 50:21.160]  Except as provided by subsection C,
[50:21.160 --> 50:29.160]  an operator who does not exhibit evidence of financial responsibility under subsection A
[50:29.160 --> 50:40.160]  is presumed to have operated the vehicle in violation of section 601.051.
[50:40.160 --> 50:48.160]  Now, what this means is the legislature has created the legislative mandate
[50:48.160 --> 50:55.160]  that a defendant charged with failure to maintain financial responsibility
[50:55.160 --> 51:00.160]  is now required to prove their innocence
[51:00.160 --> 51:07.160]  rather than the burden of proof being on the prosecutor to prove their guilt.
[51:07.160 --> 51:14.160]  It is completely backwards to centuries-old jurisprudence
[51:14.160 --> 51:18.160]  that predates the migration of the Founding Fathers
[51:18.160 --> 51:23.160]  to the shores of what would become the United States of America.
[51:23.160 --> 51:27.160]  Oh, interesting.
[51:27.160 --> 51:36.160]  Interesting in that this requirement can be made on the individual
[51:36.160 --> 51:42.160]  because the individual is exercising the privilege
[51:42.160 --> 51:47.160]  of operating under authority of a license issued by the state.
[51:47.160 --> 51:48.160]  Correct.
[51:48.160 --> 51:57.160]  Therefore, in order to secure this license, a person must waive his rights.
[51:57.160 --> 51:59.160]  Correct again.
[51:59.160 --> 52:07.160]  So now in order to exercise the right to travel,
[52:07.160 --> 52:11.160]  you have to waive the right against self-incrimination.
[52:11.160 --> 52:13.160]  Correct.
[52:13.160 --> 52:15.160]  Now, we know where that goes.
[52:15.160 --> 52:19.160]  This actually goes to one other due process violation
[52:19.160 --> 52:24.160]  because now what we've got is a situation by this statutory mandate
[52:24.160 --> 52:28.160]  that you are no longer innocent until proven guilty.
[52:28.160 --> 52:35.160]  The statute presumes you are guilty, a complete due process violation.
[52:35.160 --> 52:37.160]  Okay?
[52:37.160 --> 52:42.160]  They can do that under a license, though.
[52:42.160 --> 52:46.160]  This all goes back to the requirement to have the license.
[52:46.160 --> 52:52.160]  Yes, but in order for you to waive a right, okay,
[52:52.160 --> 52:55.160]  the waiver must be knowing and willing.
[52:55.160 --> 52:58.160]  This creates a statutory requirement.
[52:58.160 --> 53:05.160]  Whether you are willing to do it or not, you must waive it.
[53:05.160 --> 53:09.160]  And even the procurement of the license
[53:09.160 --> 53:19.160]  cannot constitutionally stand up to the waiver of a protected right.
[53:19.160 --> 53:21.160]  The legislature, as we both know,
[53:21.160 --> 53:28.160]  cannot require you to waive one right for the purpose of exercising another.
[53:28.160 --> 53:31.160]  Yeah, this all goes back to right to travel.
[53:31.160 --> 53:33.160]  Right.
[53:33.160 --> 53:40.160]  Okay, now, the other thing that 601.053A does
[53:40.160 --> 53:44.160]  is it violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendment requirements
[53:44.160 --> 53:50.160]  that you cannot be made to provide evidence or testimony
[53:50.160 --> 53:53.160]  against yourself in a criminal action.
[53:53.160 --> 54:02.160]  601.053A requires that you provide this information upon request
[54:02.160 --> 54:06.160]  even though if you are in violation of it,
[54:06.160 --> 54:11.160]  it's a criminal act and the information provided
[54:11.160 --> 54:15.160]  can be used against you in a court of law.
[54:15.160 --> 54:18.160]  The officer, when he requests this,
[54:18.160 --> 54:23.160]  is in a full-blown criminal case investigation,
[54:23.160 --> 54:26.160]  which means in order to ask you questions
[54:26.160 --> 54:30.160]  and gather evidence that can be used against you,
[54:30.160 --> 54:33.160]  one, he must have informed you of your rights,
[54:33.160 --> 54:37.160]  and two, you must have waived the right to remain silent
[54:37.160 --> 54:39.160]  or to not testify against yourself
[54:39.160 --> 54:44.160]  or to not provide him with the evidence he seeks.
[54:44.160 --> 54:53.160]  And yet, this statute requires that you surrender that right from the get-go.
[54:53.160 --> 55:01.160]  So right there in 601.053, you have to right in your face
[55:01.160 --> 55:09.160]  due process constitutional violations immediately.
[55:09.160 --> 55:16.160]  When people ask me how I got started in this legal reform issue,
[55:16.160 --> 55:20.160]  and that's exactly how I got started.
[55:20.160 --> 55:25.160]  It was in 81, just after the requirement to show insurance was put in place.
[55:25.160 --> 55:31.160]  I was pulled over by a police officer and he demanded my proof of insurance.
[55:31.160 --> 55:35.160]  And I asked him, if I show you my proof of insurance
[55:35.160 --> 55:39.160]  and you look at it and it expired yesterday,
[55:39.160 --> 55:41.160]  what are you going to do?
[55:41.160 --> 55:43.160]  Well, I'll write you a ticket.
[55:43.160 --> 55:46.160]  Well, then I'm not going to show it to you.
[55:46.160 --> 55:49.160]  He arrested me immediately.
[55:49.160 --> 55:53.160]  And the rest is history.
[55:53.160 --> 55:54.160]  Yep.
[55:54.160 --> 56:01.160]  The problem is, however, in Texas, 601 is outside of Subtitle C.
[56:01.160 --> 56:04.160]  601 is in Subtitle D.
[56:04.160 --> 56:09.160]  If they arrest you for failure to maintain financial responsibility,
[56:09.160 --> 56:13.160]  the officer has acted outside of his lawful arrest authority
[56:13.160 --> 56:18.160]  pursuant Chapter 543 of Subtitle C,
[56:18.160 --> 56:23.160]  where the legislature specifically limited every peace officer's ability
[56:23.160 --> 56:30.160]  to arrest without warrant to violations of Subtitle C only.
[56:30.160 --> 56:36.160]  Therefore, no driver's license is not an arrestable offense.
[56:36.160 --> 56:41.160]  Failure to maintain financial responsibility is not an arrestable offense.
[56:41.160 --> 56:49.160]  No license plates and no registration sticker on the car are not arrestable offenses.
[56:49.160 --> 56:55.160]  They cannot use any of those as the grounds to initiate the stop
[56:55.160 --> 57:02.160]  because the moment they do that for the purpose of issuing the citation for that offense,
[57:02.160 --> 57:07.160]  you are in a custodial arrest and he has violated the provisions of 543,
[57:07.160 --> 57:19.160]  which limit that authority to certain offenses only in relation to traffic.
[57:19.160 --> 57:23.160]  Works for me.
[57:23.160 --> 57:26.160]  So that's what I've got in regards to that,
[57:26.160 --> 57:32.160]  but I've been working today on the motion to quash the complaint associated with such a charge
[57:32.160 --> 57:38.160]  and the affidavit in support of the motion to quash.
[57:38.160 --> 57:45.160]  So that's where my day, besides tons of telephone calls and emails, has gone.
[57:45.160 --> 57:48.160]  Okay.
[57:48.160 --> 57:51.160]  Well, we have a couple of callers.
[57:51.160 --> 57:57.160]  If you're done, not much I can add to that argument because I agree with you 100%.
[57:57.160 --> 57:58.160]  All right.
[57:58.160 --> 58:01.160]  Well, I am done then, so let's get on with it.
[58:01.160 --> 58:02.160]  Okay.
[58:02.160 --> 58:05.160]  We're going to go to Kathy in Texas.
[58:05.160 --> 58:06.160]  After the break.
[58:06.160 --> 58:09.160]  Kathy, what do you have for us?
[58:09.160 --> 58:11.160]  Are we taking a break?
[58:11.160 --> 58:13.160]  Yeah, we're about to go to break, Kathy.
[58:13.160 --> 58:14.160]  I'll be here.
[58:14.160 --> 58:17.160]  If you'll hang in there just a second, we'll get you on the other side.
[58:17.160 --> 58:20.160]  We've got 45 seconds.
[58:20.160 --> 58:25.160]  Yeah, we've got just enough time for me to tell a short story and not get to your question.
[58:25.160 --> 58:28.160]  Well, I can tell you that you've added three questions already
[58:28.160 --> 58:33.160]  by just the last two callers and the last caller and your stuff, Eddie.
[58:33.160 --> 58:34.160]  Oh, man.
[58:34.160 --> 58:37.160]  Well, in that case, we'll have plenty to talk about on the other side, Kathy.
[58:37.160 --> 58:38.160]  Please hang in there.
[58:38.160 --> 58:39.160]  I will.
[58:39.160 --> 58:40.160]  All right.
[58:40.160 --> 58:41.160]  We'll be right back, Kathy.
[58:41.160 --> 58:42.160]  All right, folks.
[58:42.160 --> 58:47.160]  This is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[58:47.160 --> 58:50.160]  If you have any issues or questions, now is the time to ask.
[58:50.160 --> 58:52.160]  It is our four-hour marathon night.
[58:52.160 --> 59:00.160]  So give us a call and we'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[59:00.160 --> 59:03.160]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[59:03.160 --> 59:08.160]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.160 --> 59:11.160]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:11.160 --> 59:16.160]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:16.160 --> 59:19.160]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:19.160 --> 59:23.160]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.160 --> 59:28.160]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.160 --> 59:32.160]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.160 --> 59:35.160]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:35.160 --> 59:38.160]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.160 --> 59:43.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.160 --> 59:48.160]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free
[59:48.160 --> 59:53.160]  at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.160 --> 59:57.160]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.160 --> 01:00:00.160]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:00.160 --> 01:00:04.160]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:04.160 --> 01:00:08.160]  There were reports Friday a dispute between Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
[01:00:08.160 --> 01:00:13.160]  and the country's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has intensified.
[01:00:13.160 --> 01:00:18.160]  Ahmadinejad is said to be contemplating resigning after Hadar Moslehi,
[01:00:18.160 --> 01:00:21.160]  the intelligence minister he sacked, was reinstated by Khamenei.
[01:00:21.160 --> 01:00:24.160]  Ahmadinejad is believed to have shirked some duties
[01:00:24.160 --> 01:00:28.160]  and skipped cabinet meetings in anger over the decision.
[01:00:28.160 --> 01:00:34.160]  Pakistan's Foreign Minister Thursday raised fresh doubts about the legality of killing Osama bin Laden,
[01:00:34.160 --> 01:00:37.160]  saying U.S. forces violated his country's sovereignty.
[01:00:37.160 --> 01:00:42.160]  Analysts say Salman Bashir's statement may have also been aimed at preventing India
[01:00:42.160 --> 01:00:49.160]  from launching a revenge raid on Pakistan for the 2008 Mumbai massacres.
[01:00:49.160 --> 01:00:55.160]  Palestinian youth leaders say the historic unity agreement signed this week in Cairo is only a first step.
[01:00:55.160 --> 01:01:00.160]  Leaders of the March 15 movement say it aims to rehabilitate the scattered Palestinian population
[01:01:00.160 --> 01:01:04.160]  by holding national council elections that include all Palestinians
[01:01:04.160 --> 01:01:09.160]  regardless of geographic location and circumstances.
[01:01:09.160 --> 01:01:13.160]  Twelve people were killed in a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan's tribal region Friday,
[01:01:13.160 --> 01:01:17.160]  the first such attack since U.S. troops killed Osama bin Laden Sunday.
[01:01:17.160 --> 01:01:22.160]  Pakistani intelligence officials told CNN 12 suspected militants were killed.
[01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:25.160]  The U.S. operation against bin Laden intensified discord
[01:01:25.160 --> 01:01:29.160]  and highlighted the mistrust between Pakistan and the U.S.,
[01:01:29.160 --> 01:01:31.160]  which did not inform Pakistanis of the raid.
[01:01:31.160 --> 01:01:36.160]  Last month, 44 people were killed in a drone strike in Pakistan's tribal region,
[01:01:36.160 --> 01:01:40.160]  and the Pakistan government formally asked the U.S. for an apology.
[01:01:40.160 --> 01:01:46.160]  Friday's drone strike was the 21st this year compared to 111 in all of 2010.
[01:01:46.160 --> 01:01:52.160]  Opposition leader Imran Khan has warned his party and followers will disrupt the flow of supplies
[01:01:52.160 --> 01:01:58.160]  through Pakistan to NATO troops in Afghanistan if drone strikes aren't stopped.
[01:01:58.160 --> 01:02:04.160]  Syrian security forces opened fire on hundreds of protesters on the outskirts of the capital Friday
[01:02:04.160 --> 01:02:07.160]  and thousands of people joined demonstrations across the country
[01:02:07.160 --> 01:02:11.160]  calling for an end to President Bashar Assad's regime.
[01:02:11.160 --> 01:02:16.160]  Security forces set up checkpoints in closed areas that have experienced protests in recent weeks,
[01:02:16.160 --> 01:02:20.160]  including the flashpoint city of Daraa, which remained under siege.
[01:02:20.160 --> 01:02:25.160]  Protesters echoed cries heard during the revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia.
[01:02:25.160 --> 01:02:27.160]  The people want to topple the regime.
[01:02:27.160 --> 01:02:30.160]  President Assad has attempted to crush the revolt
[01:02:30.160 --> 01:02:35.160]  that has now become the gravest challenge to his family's 40-year dynasty
[01:02:35.160 --> 01:02:40.160]  through a combination of brute force, intimidation, and promises of reform.
[01:02:40.160 --> 01:02:43.160]  Security forces have repeatedly opened fire on protesters.
[01:02:43.160 --> 01:02:47.160]  Last Friday, at least 65 people were killed.
[01:02:47.160 --> 01:02:55.160]  More than 565 civilians and 100 soldiers have been killed since anti-regime protests began in March.
[01:02:55.160 --> 01:03:05.160]  For more details on this story, visit www.inmworldrecord.net.
[01:03:05.160 --> 01:03:11.160]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:03:11.160 --> 01:03:16.160]  Live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:16.160 --> 01:03:18.160]  Thank you.
[01:03:47.160 --> 01:03:51.160]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens.
[01:03:51.160 --> 01:03:53.160]  We were on the radio.
[01:03:53.160 --> 01:03:58.160]  We were talking to Kathy before winter break, and she had some questions for us.
[01:03:58.160 --> 01:04:02.160]  What do you have for us, Kathy?
[01:04:02.160 --> 01:04:06.160]  Process questions, and I do need to get to those.
[01:04:06.160 --> 01:04:12.160]  But all this other stuff is like, oh my goodness, now I have, my brain is on fire.
[01:04:12.160 --> 01:04:19.160]  But if we can just step back for one question, back to the Real ID issue and Guy's call,
[01:04:19.160 --> 01:04:24.160]  and we were talking about how do we have standing.
[01:04:24.160 --> 01:04:37.160]  Was I hearing correctly when the bill is suggesting that the funds used are from the fees for driver's licenses and those things?
[01:04:37.160 --> 01:04:38.160]  Yes.
[01:04:38.160 --> 01:04:48.160]  Okay, if those are the funds we're talking about, why does not every person who paid a driver's license fee have standing
[01:04:48.160 --> 01:04:57.160]  due to have putting money into that bucket because it becomes then public funds the way they're trying to distribute it?
[01:04:57.160 --> 01:05:01.160]  That's exactly what I was thinking when I said that.
[01:05:01.160 --> 01:05:03.160]  Why can't we have a mass action suit?
[01:05:03.160 --> 01:05:13.160]  Well, my problem was I just paid recently to get my driver's license, and this is not implemented yet.
[01:05:13.160 --> 01:05:20.160]  So it will be another four years before I have to pay and get standing.
[01:05:20.160 --> 01:05:23.160]  But why do you not have standing anyway?
[01:05:23.160 --> 01:05:29.160]  Because we have supplied the funds that they are just about to go get,
[01:05:29.160 --> 01:05:34.160]  and we know that we will renew, and we have all paid more than once.
[01:05:34.160 --> 01:05:37.160]  Almost everyone has bought more than one license.
[01:05:37.160 --> 01:05:44.160]  The money is going into an existing pot of money that has already been allocated.
[01:05:44.160 --> 01:05:49.160]  Why can't we charge them with misappropriation of funds?
[01:05:49.160 --> 01:05:53.160]  Because do those not become public funds?
[01:05:53.160 --> 01:06:02.160]  Yes, we can sue to right us of the wrong, but that's more tenuous and easier to argue against.
[01:06:02.160 --> 01:06:11.160]  They can come back with the argument that we haven't personally been harmed so we don't have standing, and the case law on that's iffy.
[01:06:11.160 --> 01:06:24.160]  But in the injunction relief even, would we not have standing based on the fact that the harm is coming from the misappropriation of those funds,
[01:06:24.160 --> 01:06:31.160]  and we all have standing because that's where the money is coming from, all our pockets, and it's not that we're asking for money back.
[01:06:31.160 --> 01:06:32.160]  Well, wait a minute, Kathy.
[01:06:32.160 --> 01:06:34.160]  Why would not the money give us standing?
[01:06:34.160 --> 01:06:51.160]  Wait a minute, Kathy. Misappropriation of funds is when the legislature has authorized pursuant to statute the delineation of money for certain expenses.
[01:06:51.160 --> 01:07:05.160]  So in order to claim misappropriation of funds, we would have to prove up a money trail that is not in compliance with the statute.
[01:07:05.160 --> 01:07:09.160]  Okay, now they're trying to pass statutes that we don't like, baby.
[01:07:09.160 --> 01:07:10.160]  Yes.
[01:07:10.160 --> 01:07:13.160]  Well, that's not exactly correct.
[01:07:13.160 --> 01:07:18.160]  If an agency is collecting money, let's take the traffic fines, for instance.
[01:07:18.160 --> 01:07:23.160]  We agree that the courts are collecting the money, correct?
[01:07:23.160 --> 01:07:31.160]  And we agree that the legislature has said that out of those funds, they are to be divvied up a certain way,
[01:07:31.160 --> 01:07:37.160]  and they are to be put into certain accounts for a specific use.
[01:07:37.160 --> 01:07:49.160]  If the court or the city or anybody else gets their hands on those funds and uses them for something they are not statutorily authorized to use them for,
[01:07:49.160 --> 01:07:53.160]  that is misappropriation of funds.
[01:07:53.160 --> 01:07:57.160]  That's the court's tail suit, but that's not what we were talking about.
[01:07:57.160 --> 01:08:05.160]  We were talking about the agency receiving funds from a foreign government.
[01:08:05.160 --> 01:08:07.160]  Yeah, but they're not.
[01:08:07.160 --> 01:08:10.160]  She's talking about getting fees off of our driver's licenses to fund this.
[01:08:10.160 --> 01:08:17.160]  Because I was understanding that that's what they were saying, that they would use the driver's license fees to fund the risk.
[01:08:17.160 --> 01:08:19.160]  Wait a minute.
[01:08:19.160 --> 01:08:22.160]  This is an unfunded federal mandate.
[01:08:22.160 --> 01:08:23.160]  Wait a minute.
[01:08:23.160 --> 01:08:25.160]  Oh, it's an unfunded...
[01:08:25.160 --> 01:08:36.160]  We don't have the issue of if they're receiving federal funds from a foreign government, then we have standing because they're our funds.
[01:08:36.160 --> 01:08:38.160]  That's right, because we put money into that bucket.
[01:08:38.160 --> 01:08:44.160]  That's what I was thinking, that it just gives everybody standing to put into whatever money they're pulling.
[01:08:44.160 --> 01:08:45.160]  Wait a minute.
[01:08:45.160 --> 01:08:46.160]  Wait a minute.
[01:08:46.160 --> 01:08:47.160]  I have a question here.
[01:08:47.160 --> 01:08:50.160]  Where is the harm?
[01:08:50.160 --> 01:08:52.160]  Where is the tort?
[01:08:52.160 --> 01:08:55.160]  This is a voluntary contract.
[01:08:55.160 --> 01:09:00.160]  You don't have to get a driver's license and pay for it.
[01:09:00.160 --> 01:09:02.160]  You don't have to do that.
[01:09:02.160 --> 01:09:07.160]  You are coerced into believing at the point of a gun that you do.
[01:09:07.160 --> 01:09:09.160]  This is an adhesion contract.
[01:09:09.160 --> 01:09:11.160]  Yeah.
[01:09:11.160 --> 01:09:14.160]  We don't have a reasonable option.
[01:09:14.160 --> 01:09:19.160]  There is the illusion of option, but it's only an illusion.
[01:09:19.160 --> 01:09:30.160]  And if you exercise the option not to, then you will have to fight the due process violations that they're going to put on you the minute they stop you and catch you.
[01:09:30.160 --> 01:09:42.160]  How about a conspiracy claim against the officer if he stops you without cause to believe that you're in commerce,
[01:09:42.160 --> 01:09:53.160]  then he's acting in concert and collusion with this conspiracy to extort monies from you.
[01:09:53.160 --> 01:09:54.160]  Okay.
[01:09:54.160 --> 01:09:58.160]  Where you been?
[01:09:58.160 --> 01:10:00.160]  Well, it sounds like fun.
[01:10:00.160 --> 01:10:03.160]  I thought that's what I've been saying the whole dang time anyway.
[01:10:03.160 --> 01:10:04.160]  That's right.
[01:10:04.160 --> 01:10:05.160]  Yeah.
[01:10:05.160 --> 01:10:07.160]  I mean, the exact way to make the suit.
[01:10:07.160 --> 01:10:08.160]  Okay.
[01:10:08.160 --> 01:10:14.160]  I'm not talking about it from a different perspective, I wasn't thinking about it in terms of a cause of action.
[01:10:14.160 --> 01:10:26.160]  The police officer himself by making the stop and not ascertaining, not asking first, are you in commerce,
[01:10:26.160 --> 01:10:34.160]  but acting as though it doesn't matter and wielding the loaded pistol.
[01:10:34.160 --> 01:10:39.160]  Okay.
[01:10:39.160 --> 01:10:40.160]  Rico.
[01:10:40.160 --> 01:10:42.160]  Okay.
[01:10:42.160 --> 01:10:46.160]  Which leads me right into what I really need to ask, if you don't mind.
[01:10:46.160 --> 01:10:56.160]  We have another case of kidnapping and all of that that goes along with it for a friend,
[01:10:56.160 --> 01:11:02.160]  and I understand, Randy, that you have actually spoken with her and she did what you told her today.
[01:11:02.160 --> 01:11:07.160]  She's gone down to ask for all the records.
[01:11:07.160 --> 01:11:09.160]  Is this Tatiana?
[01:11:09.160 --> 01:11:10.160]  Yeah.
[01:11:10.160 --> 01:11:12.160]  Actually, yes.
[01:11:12.160 --> 01:11:23.160]  So the question I have for her is it's not too late to file the habeas corpus even though she's at home,
[01:11:23.160 --> 01:11:28.160]  and she's not certain yet if there are any charges actually made.
[01:11:28.160 --> 01:11:33.160]  We're looking for them now and can't find actual charges.
[01:11:33.160 --> 01:11:36.160]  Whoa, hold on, hold on.
[01:11:36.160 --> 01:11:47.160]  Have Tatiana go to the county court clerk and give her a written request for all records collected,
[01:11:47.160 --> 01:11:54.160]  simply maintained by the department relating to this person that are specifically referenced
[01:11:54.160 --> 01:11:57.160]  by Article 1730 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:11:57.160 --> 01:12:01.160]  Look on my website, nojurisimprudence.com.
[01:12:01.160 --> 01:12:05.160]  There is a blank 1730 information request.
[01:12:05.160 --> 01:12:06.160]  Okay.
[01:12:06.160 --> 01:12:17.160]  Have her fill that one out and give it to the clerk, and when the clerk comes back and says she has no records,
[01:12:17.160 --> 01:12:24.160]  then ask for that in writing that she has no records responsive to this request.
[01:12:24.160 --> 01:12:27.160]  Okay.
[01:12:27.160 --> 01:12:35.160]  And they need to find out who is the magistrate she was brought before,
[01:12:35.160 --> 01:12:39.160]  and you can find that out from the jail and go to that magistrate's office.
[01:12:39.160 --> 01:12:41.160]  Okay.
[01:12:41.160 --> 01:12:45.160]  And demand the arrest warrant.
[01:12:45.160 --> 01:12:52.160]  The magistrate was required to issue a warrant under 16.20 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:12:52.160 --> 01:13:03.160]  and under 1516, he's required to make the warrant open for public inspection immediately after execution.
[01:13:03.160 --> 01:13:11.160]  So this one was executed expo facto before the issuance, so it had to be made immediately available.
[01:13:11.160 --> 01:13:17.160]  Right, and this is also she was in jail for a whole day before she saw an magistrate,
[01:13:17.160 --> 01:13:25.160]  which we're putting together now already the kidnapping charge, the conspiracy charge.
[01:13:25.160 --> 01:13:31.160]  You just reminded me, we can add conspiracy to extort money,
[01:13:31.160 --> 01:13:37.160]  but apparently there were no charges made, and so it was like, oh, go on home.
[01:13:37.160 --> 01:13:45.160]  But when you're arrested and whatever, in her case, and I'm not sure who's familiar with it,
[01:13:45.160 --> 01:13:53.160]  the police officer followed her to her house or to her home one afternoon.
[01:13:53.160 --> 01:13:55.160]  She saw him.
[01:13:55.160 --> 01:13:57.160]  He went behind her for some distance.
[01:13:57.160 --> 01:13:58.160]  She turned in.
[01:13:58.160 --> 01:13:59.160]  She went home.
[01:13:59.160 --> 01:14:04.160]  When she came out of her house the next day, he was there, and he followed her.
[01:14:04.160 --> 01:14:10.160]  He turned on his lights and stopped her and said he was arresting her for evading arrest,
[01:14:10.160 --> 01:14:16.160]  that he had tried to arrest her the day before or some such nonsense.
[01:14:16.160 --> 01:14:17.160]  It's like, give me a break.
[01:14:17.160 --> 01:14:18.160]  There was nothing.
[01:14:18.160 --> 01:14:22.160]  There was not even your taillights broken or anything like that.
[01:14:22.160 --> 01:14:24.160]  And he never turned on the lights on his car?
[01:14:24.160 --> 01:14:27.160]  Only in the morning the next day, the second day.
[01:14:27.160 --> 01:14:30.160]  He never turned on lights the first time.
[01:14:30.160 --> 01:14:31.160]  She just saw him.
[01:14:31.160 --> 01:14:34.160]  He was driving behind her like people do.
[01:14:34.160 --> 01:14:36.160]  He's driving down the street, no sign.
[01:14:36.160 --> 01:14:38.160]  He wanted her to stop.
[01:14:38.160 --> 01:14:41.160]  He really needs to end this officer's career.
[01:14:41.160 --> 01:14:44.160]  And I'm jumping in here.
[01:14:44.160 --> 01:14:46.160]  I want to help her with boots on.
[01:14:46.160 --> 01:14:56.160]  So the question I have is can we go straight to the grand jury or do we just do the charges the normal way?
[01:14:56.160 --> 01:15:00.160]  But I want to charge him with stalking.
[01:15:00.160 --> 01:15:06.160]  I believe he stalked her and then kidnapped her.
[01:15:06.160 --> 01:15:12.160]  And if there are no charges made, then he is aggravated kidnapping.
[01:15:12.160 --> 01:15:22.160]  And I would even go so far as whatever level stalking can go down to, if it's sexual or whatever, we want to throw it at him.
[01:15:22.160 --> 01:15:30.160]  Because with no lights, no nothing, you wait a whole day overnight, whatever, what's the point?
[01:15:30.160 --> 01:15:33.160]  Well, you have false imprisonment for sure.
[01:15:33.160 --> 01:15:37.160]  You have aggravated kidnapping and aggravated assault for sure.
[01:15:37.160 --> 01:15:46.160]  Since there was a second officer on the scene during the arrest who cooperated fully with that arrest, you have criminal conspiracy.
[01:15:46.160 --> 01:15:55.160]  And since it involved the magistrate and the jail, you've now got organized criminal activity plus your abuse of official capacity and official oppression.
[01:15:55.160 --> 01:15:56.160]  Right.
[01:15:56.160 --> 01:15:59.160]  And conspiracy includes the bailiff, does it not?
[01:15:59.160 --> 01:16:05.160]  Okay, let me raise one issue here.
[01:16:05.160 --> 01:16:16.160]  This is exactly what happened to me at the State Department, at the Secretary of State when I called 911, and the DPS wound up knocking out one of my teeth and arrested me.
[01:16:16.160 --> 01:16:17.160]  Right.
[01:16:17.160 --> 01:16:22.160]  Held me for 24 hours and released me.
[01:16:22.160 --> 01:16:33.160]  When I filed a set of information requests with the department, the officers went back and sought a warrant.
[01:16:33.160 --> 01:16:39.160]  She needs to be aware they may do that and we may need to move to preempt that this time.
[01:16:39.160 --> 01:16:40.160]  Okay.
[01:16:40.160 --> 01:16:42.160]  Hang on, we'll address this on the other side.
[01:16:42.160 --> 01:16:52.160]  This may be a great time to lay a speed bump in their path because we anticipate them.
[01:16:52.160 --> 01:16:57.160]  Okay, this is Randy Coulson, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, The Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:57.160 --> 01:17:00.160]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:17:00.160 --> 01:17:07.160]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area.
[01:17:07.160 --> 01:17:09.160]  We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:09.160 --> 01:17:14.160]  We're a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases.
[01:17:14.160 --> 01:17:20.160]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location.
[01:17:20.160 --> 01:17:27.160]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location.
[01:17:27.160 --> 01:17:35.160]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor next to the Ishoban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:35.160 --> 01:17:39.160]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[01:17:39.160 --> 01:17:45.160]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:45.160 --> 01:17:50.160]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:17:50.160 --> 01:18:00.160]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.160 --> 01:18:04.160]  My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:18:04.160 --> 01:18:09.160]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[01:18:09.160 --> 01:18:15.160]  With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:18:15.160 --> 01:18:22.160]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of thousands, but there is a remedy.
[01:18:22.160 --> 01:18:37.160]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:18:37.160 --> 01:18:43.160]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime.
[01:18:43.160 --> 01:18:48.160]  Lender fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back.
[01:18:48.160 --> 01:19:00.160]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks.
[01:19:19.160 --> 01:19:25.160]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:25.160 --> 01:19:30.160]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plans.
[01:19:30.160 --> 01:19:35.160]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:35.160 --> 01:19:40.160]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:40.160 --> 01:19:44.160]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plans.
[01:19:44.160 --> 01:19:49.160]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:49.160 --> 01:19:53.160]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plans.
[01:19:53.160 --> 01:20:10.160]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plans.
[01:20:23.160 --> 01:20:36.160]  You cannot evade arrest, period, unless the officer has reasonable probable cause to arrest for some other issue.
[01:20:36.160 --> 01:20:42.160]  I'd like to see what that issue is.
[01:20:42.160 --> 01:20:50.160]  Okay, one of the things you absolutely want to see is the police report from that officer.
[01:20:50.160 --> 01:20:53.160]  She went for them today.
[01:20:53.160 --> 01:21:11.160]  You might want to go down and request the dispatch tapes from the day he supposedly originally tried to arrest her and the day he did arrest her.
[01:21:11.160 --> 01:21:14.160]  You want to see what's on the dispatch logs.
[01:21:14.160 --> 01:21:16.160]  Right.
[01:21:16.160 --> 01:21:26.160]  So if he was attempting to arrest someone and they evaded arrest, we're going to want to hear the call in.
[01:21:26.160 --> 01:21:30.160]  If there was no call in, there was no evading arrest.
[01:21:30.160 --> 01:21:31.160]  And you just made me think of something.
[01:21:31.160 --> 01:21:34.160]  I wonder if he was even on duty the day before.
[01:21:34.160 --> 01:21:36.160]  Get a CAD report.
[01:21:36.160 --> 01:21:37.160]  Okay.
[01:21:37.160 --> 01:21:42.160]  If he actually made a call in, the CAD report will show what calls were made in and who was assigned to what.
[01:21:42.160 --> 01:21:44.160]  Okay.
[01:21:44.160 --> 01:21:47.160]  What does CAD stand for?
[01:21:47.160 --> 01:21:48.160]  I don't know.
[01:21:48.160 --> 01:21:51.160]  That's an acronym they've got here that I'm not familiar with.
[01:21:51.160 --> 01:21:53.160]  It wasn't there when I was in.
[01:21:53.160 --> 01:21:55.160]  Oh, Randy, you know what a CAD is.
[01:21:55.160 --> 01:21:59.160]  They're all CADs.
[01:21:59.160 --> 01:22:02.160]  I think it's call and dispatch.
[01:22:02.160 --> 01:22:04.160]  Oh, that sounds reasonable.
[01:22:04.160 --> 01:22:06.160]  Call and dispatch, okay.
[01:22:06.160 --> 01:22:07.160]  Okay.
[01:22:07.160 --> 01:22:13.160]  They have a can down here, but not a CAD.
[01:22:13.160 --> 01:22:14.160]  Okay.
[01:22:14.160 --> 01:22:32.160]  Well, this, you know, if she does this, okay, what we were talking about when we went out is if she starts to go after them, then they are likely to come back and issue a warrant for her arrest as retaliation.
[01:22:32.160 --> 01:22:33.160]  That's what they did to me.
[01:22:33.160 --> 01:22:39.160]  So I would suggest that she go to Herb Evans.
[01:22:39.160 --> 01:22:45.160]  Herb Evans is the Justice of the Peace there in the courthouse building.
[01:22:45.160 --> 01:22:46.160]  Okay.
[01:22:46.160 --> 01:22:51.160]  And what do we ask for?
[01:22:51.160 --> 01:22:53.160]  A restraining order?
[01:22:53.160 --> 01:22:55.160]  Well, she doesn't really.
[01:22:55.160 --> 01:22:56.160]  Not really.
[01:22:56.160 --> 01:22:58.160]  This would go to habeas corpus.
[01:22:58.160 --> 01:22:59.160]  Okay.
[01:22:59.160 --> 01:23:10.160]  Actually, she should take a habeas corpus to whoever the head criminal district judge is for Travis County.
[01:23:10.160 --> 01:23:12.160]  Don't file it with the clerk.
[01:23:12.160 --> 01:23:13.160]  Okay.
[01:23:13.160 --> 01:23:18.160]  Find out who the head criminal district judge is.
[01:23:18.160 --> 01:23:20.160]  It used to be Bob Perkins, but he retired.
[01:23:20.160 --> 01:23:21.160]  Okay.
[01:23:21.160 --> 01:23:22.160]  Find out who it is.
[01:23:22.160 --> 01:23:30.160]  Find out when he has motion hearings and go in and bushwhack him in his courtroom with habeas.
[01:23:30.160 --> 01:23:31.160]  Okay.
[01:23:31.160 --> 01:23:34.160]  Now, you don't really have to file the habeas.
[01:23:34.160 --> 01:23:37.160]  Just have to give it to him during a motion hearing?
[01:23:37.160 --> 01:23:38.160]  Yeah.
[01:23:38.160 --> 01:23:48.160]  Go in there and play dom and tell the bailiff that I have business with the court, and when he asks if he can tell the judge the nature of the business, yes, you can.
[01:23:48.160 --> 01:23:51.160]  Give him this and put it in the red folder.
[01:23:51.160 --> 01:23:53.160]  Okay.
[01:23:53.160 --> 01:23:58.160]  And when the judge looks at it, he's going to give you sage advice.
[01:23:58.160 --> 01:24:03.160]  And then you get to explain to the judge what your problem and concern is.
[01:24:03.160 --> 01:24:11.160]  And you could mention me and that this was done to me by the Department of Public Safety when they arrested me.
[01:24:11.160 --> 01:24:26.160]  And because the sergeant acted ignorant, didn't file charges against me, release me, but when I indicated that I was going to take action, then in retaliation, they went and had a warrant issued.
[01:24:26.160 --> 01:24:32.160]  And I was arrested by the FBI when I went to them to file criminal charges against some other people.
[01:24:32.160 --> 01:24:33.160]  Right.
[01:24:33.160 --> 01:24:37.160]  And we can honestly say my friend Randall Kelton had an issue.
[01:24:37.160 --> 01:25:00.160]  Yeah, exactly like this, and you're afraid that if she takes action to prevent this officer from arresting other young women this way, that or stalking other young women this way, that she may be subject to a retaliatory arrest in a malicious prosecution as Mr. Kelton was.
[01:25:00.160 --> 01:25:01.160]  Yes.
[01:25:01.160 --> 01:25:08.160]  And you probably heard all about that prosecution because I crawled all over him. So I'm sure that got all over the courthouse.
[01:25:08.160 --> 01:25:13.160]  And if not, we could drag up those records and hand them to him to refresh his memory.
[01:25:13.160 --> 01:25:14.160]  Exactly.
[01:25:14.160 --> 01:25:20.160]  If I was there, I would gladly go down there and do it myself.
[01:25:20.160 --> 01:25:22.160]  But do that.
[01:25:22.160 --> 01:25:25.160]  And now it comes to his hand.
[01:25:25.160 --> 01:25:31.160]  And, you know, he's going to say, well, you really need to file this this way or that way or the other way.
[01:25:31.160 --> 01:25:33.160]  Ask him your honor.
[01:25:33.160 --> 01:25:40.160]  You really don't want to create all of this difficulty, if you can avoid it.
[01:25:40.160 --> 01:25:55.160]  Is there some other way we could potentially head off increased litigation without having to go through all of these legal maneuvers?
[01:25:55.160 --> 01:26:03.160]  And he's likely to tell you, well, just let me make some phone calls and I'll get back to you.
[01:26:03.160 --> 01:26:07.160]  He will understand exactly what you're doing.
[01:26:07.160 --> 01:26:08.160]  Okay.
[01:26:08.160 --> 01:26:15.160]  You're asking him, make a call or two, make sure nobody does anything stupid.
[01:26:15.160 --> 01:26:23.160]  And he will most likely appreciate that you give him the opportunity and one call from him, explain what's going on here.
[01:26:23.160 --> 01:26:25.160]  Do you have warrants?
[01:26:25.160 --> 01:26:35.160]  I was thrown out of the courthouse in Stephenville by the Texas Ranger because I told him he was worthless.
[01:26:35.160 --> 01:26:41.160]  I was making criminal accusations to the justice of the peace and he came up and asked me what my name was.
[01:26:41.160 --> 01:26:42.160]  And I told him, I said, who are you?
[01:26:42.160 --> 01:26:45.160]  He said, well, I'm Joe Hudson.
[01:26:45.160 --> 01:26:46.160]  I said, are you the bailiff?
[01:26:46.160 --> 01:26:48.160]  No, I'm a Texas Ranger.
[01:26:48.160 --> 01:26:49.160]  You're a Texas Ranger?
[01:26:49.160 --> 01:26:50.160]  Oh, you're worthless.
[01:26:50.160 --> 01:26:51.160]  You can beat it.
[01:26:51.160 --> 01:26:52.160]  You're dismissed.
[01:26:52.160 --> 01:26:55.160]  And he got real excited and threw me out of the building.
[01:26:55.160 --> 01:26:59.160]  I walked out, was out five minutes, turned around and walked right back in.
[01:26:59.160 --> 01:27:02.160]  And he's standing there, about a half a dozen other police officers.
[01:27:02.160 --> 01:27:04.160]  And I pointed at him, you.
[01:27:04.160 --> 01:27:07.160]  Where is the district judge's office?
[01:27:07.160 --> 01:27:10.160]  You could almost hear him swallow.
[01:27:10.160 --> 01:27:11.160]  And he pointed down the hall.
[01:27:11.160 --> 01:27:21.160]  So I went and bushwhacked the judge in his office or in the courtroom and asked him to arrest the Texas Ranger.
[01:27:21.160 --> 01:27:23.160]  And he asked why would he arrest a Texas Ranger?
[01:27:23.160 --> 01:27:25.160]  Well, he committed aggravated assault.
[01:27:25.160 --> 01:27:27.160]  Well, how did he commit aggravated assault?
[01:27:27.160 --> 01:27:30.160]  He threw me out the courthouse.
[01:27:30.160 --> 01:27:32.160]  Well, Mr. Kelton, that's not aggravated assault.
[01:27:32.160 --> 01:27:33.160]  That was.
[01:27:33.160 --> 01:27:37.160]  He was displaying a deadly weapon at the time.
[01:27:37.160 --> 01:27:40.160]  He said, well, Mr. Kelton, that wasn't assault.
[01:27:40.160 --> 01:27:42.160]  Of course it was.
[01:27:42.160 --> 01:27:46.160]  Heck, if he hadn't been wearing that pistol, I'd have whooped his behind.
[01:27:46.160 --> 01:27:50.160]  And the judge kind of grinned and looked at the Ranger sitting there behind me.
[01:27:50.160 --> 01:27:53.160]  He said, Mr. Kelton, you think you can whoop that Ranger?
[01:27:53.160 --> 01:27:55.160]  I said, look at that big old fat belly.
[01:27:55.160 --> 01:27:58.160]  One good shot, he'd go down like a ton of bricks.
[01:27:58.160 --> 01:28:01.160]  But we're not going to get to find that out, are we, Your Honor?
[01:28:01.160 --> 01:28:05.160]  Because he was wearing that loaded pistol.
[01:28:05.160 --> 01:28:08.160]  And he said, well, Mr. Kelton, I'm not going to arrest the Ranger.
[01:28:08.160 --> 01:28:10.160]  And then he said, will there be anything else?
[01:28:10.160 --> 01:28:11.160]  A little more went on.
[01:28:11.160 --> 01:28:13.160]  But then he said, will there be anything else?
[01:28:13.160 --> 01:28:15.160]  I said, yes, Your Honor.
[01:28:15.160 --> 01:28:17.160]  I was about to leave the county.
[01:28:17.160 --> 01:28:24.160]  And I am concerned that that officer or one of his buddies might be sitting out there
[01:28:24.160 --> 01:28:28.160]  somewhere on the way out of the county waiting to pull me over
[01:28:28.160 --> 01:28:33.160]  and let me know how annoyed he is at me.
[01:28:33.160 --> 01:28:35.160]  Oh, Mr. Kelton, what makes you think that would happen?
[01:28:35.160 --> 01:28:37.160]  Oh, I've had that happen before, Your Honor.
[01:28:37.160 --> 01:28:40.160]  And I can tell you it's very disconcerting.
[01:28:40.160 --> 01:28:46.160]  And he looked over at the Ranger and he said, Mr. Hudson,
[01:28:46.160 --> 01:28:52.160]  do you know of any wants or warrants for Mr. Kelton?
[01:28:52.160 --> 01:28:58.160]  And he pops to like a freshman private in boot camp.
[01:28:58.160 --> 01:29:01.160]  Oh, well, no, sir.
[01:29:01.160 --> 01:29:05.160]  Do you have any reason to stop Mr. Kelton when he tries to leave this county?
[01:29:05.160 --> 01:29:06.160]  Oh, no, sir.
[01:29:06.160 --> 01:29:10.160]  So Mr. Kelton can leave this county and not have to worry about being arrested.
[01:29:10.160 --> 01:29:12.160]  Oh, yes, sir, he can.
[01:29:12.160 --> 01:29:13.160]  That's right.
[01:29:13.160 --> 01:29:14.160]  Jerk.
[01:29:14.160 --> 01:29:15.160]  And now...
[01:29:15.160 --> 01:29:18.160]  But that kind of thing would really work.
[01:29:18.160 --> 01:29:20.160]  You notify the highest guy in the district.
[01:29:20.160 --> 01:29:25.160]  We need to also in our hand have charges in writing.
[01:29:25.160 --> 01:29:28.160]  I wouldn't do that yet.
[01:29:28.160 --> 01:29:31.160]  Don't give them to that judge.
[01:29:31.160 --> 01:29:38.160]  Allow him to have room to feel as though he's handling this amicably.
[01:29:38.160 --> 01:29:40.160]  Okay.
[01:29:40.160 --> 01:29:42.160]  Otherwise, you'll back him into a corner.
[01:29:42.160 --> 01:29:44.160]  Okay, well, that's what we need right now.
[01:29:44.160 --> 01:29:47.160]  I'll let you go and y'all can come in or get to the next caller,
[01:29:47.160 --> 01:29:50.160]  because we really appreciate all the things y'all do.
[01:29:50.160 --> 01:29:52.160]  Thank you, Kathy.
[01:29:52.160 --> 01:29:55.160]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:29:55.160 --> 01:29:57.160]  We will now radio.
[01:29:57.160 --> 01:30:00.160]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:30:00.160 --> 01:30:03.160]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:03.160 --> 01:30:05.160]  Number 9, the extra leg.
[01:30:05.160 --> 01:30:09.160]  Former Oklahoma State Medical Examiner Dr. Fred Jordan had stated,
[01:30:09.160 --> 01:30:13.160]  we had eight people with amputated left legs and nine left legs to account for.
[01:30:13.160 --> 01:30:18.160]  Psychologist for Northern Ireland T.K. Marshall, who performed over 2500 autopsies in his time,
[01:30:18.160 --> 01:30:20.160]  stated, there's never been an unknown victim.
[01:30:20.160 --> 01:30:23.160]  This leg belonged to a perpetrator close enough to the bomb
[01:30:23.160 --> 01:30:26.160]  for his body to be damaged, leaving only a left leg behind.
[01:30:26.160 --> 01:30:27.160]  Who was this person?
[01:30:27.160 --> 01:30:33.160]  Please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:33.160 --> 01:30:35.160]  Yahoo!
[01:30:35.160 --> 01:30:36.160]  Do you Yahoo?
[01:30:36.160 --> 01:30:38.160]  Well, maybe not anymore.
[01:30:38.160 --> 01:30:42.160]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you how the company is backpedaling
[01:30:42.160 --> 01:30:45.160]  on an important promise to consumers.
[01:30:45.160 --> 01:30:47.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:47.160 --> 01:30:50.160]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:50.160 --> 01:30:55.160]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:55.160 --> 01:31:00.160]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:00.160 --> 01:31:03.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:31:03.160 --> 01:31:06.160]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:31:06.160 --> 01:31:10.160]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:10.160 --> 01:31:13.160]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:13.160 --> 01:31:18.160]  Back in 2008, Yahoo took a bold step for privacy by promising to anonymize
[01:31:18.160 --> 01:31:21.160]  consumer search records after 90 days.
[01:31:21.160 --> 01:31:23.160]  But now Yahoo is breaking that promise.
[01:31:23.160 --> 01:31:27.160]  They say they plan to record everything you search for on Yahoo for 18 months
[01:31:27.160 --> 01:31:29.160]  and link that data to you.
[01:31:29.160 --> 01:31:32.160]  That means if you use Yahoo, the company will record every question
[01:31:32.160 --> 01:31:35.160]  that's crossed your mind for a full year and a half.
[01:31:35.160 --> 01:31:39.160]  Saving people's search terms puts them at risk from hackers, human error,
[01:31:39.160 --> 01:31:41.160]  hackers, and Big Brother.
[01:31:41.160 --> 01:31:44.160]  But fortunately, privacy-friendly search engine StartPage.com
[01:31:44.160 --> 01:31:48.160]  doesn't collect any data on users, nada, zilch, zero.
[01:31:48.160 --> 01:31:51.160]  When no data is collected, there's no privacy problem.
[01:31:51.160 --> 01:31:53.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:32:10.160]  You can find more information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:23.160 --> 01:32:28.160]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:32:28.160 --> 01:32:32.160]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:32:32.160 --> 01:32:37.160]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:32:37.160 --> 01:32:38.160]  It is 930.
[01:32:38.160 --> 01:32:42.160]  We've got two and a half hours left on our four-hour marathon night.
[01:32:42.160 --> 01:32:46.160]  So if you have any issues or questions, please give us a call,
[01:32:46.160 --> 01:32:48.160]  because now is a good time.
[01:32:48.160 --> 01:32:51.160]  All right, right now we're going to go to Darwin in Wyoming.
[01:32:51.160 --> 01:32:53.160]  Hi, Darwin, how are you doing?
[01:32:53.160 --> 01:32:54.160]  Thanks a lot.
[01:32:54.160 --> 01:32:57.160]  You have helped the situation, I think, and for a lot of people,
[01:32:57.160 --> 01:32:59.160]  we can't thank you enough.
[01:32:59.160 --> 01:33:00.160]  Well, most welcome.
[01:33:00.160 --> 01:33:02.160]  That number you gave out a while ago,
[01:33:02.160 --> 01:33:07.160]  can that be used if we need to talk to you some time or other?
[01:33:07.160 --> 01:33:09.160]  Now, say that one more time.
[01:33:09.160 --> 01:33:11.160]  That number that you gave out, that telephone number,
[01:33:11.160 --> 01:33:14.160]  can that be used if we need to talk to you some time or other?
[01:33:14.160 --> 01:33:17.160]  No, that's just the call-in number when the show is on the air.
[01:33:17.160 --> 01:33:18.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:33:18.160 --> 01:33:23.160]  If you need to communicate with us, go to the ruleoflawradio.com website,
[01:33:23.160 --> 01:33:26.160]  send us an email with your contact information,
[01:33:26.160 --> 01:33:28.160]  and we'll be able to get to you from there.
[01:33:28.160 --> 01:33:30.160]  Okay, all right, and we thank you.
[01:33:30.160 --> 01:33:31.160]  Yes, sir.
[01:33:31.160 --> 01:33:32.160]  Is there anything else?
[01:33:32.160 --> 01:33:33.160]  A lot of people waiting to get on.
[01:33:33.160 --> 01:33:35.160]  Should I hurry this?
[01:33:35.160 --> 01:33:38.160]  We've only got a couple other callers on the board,
[01:33:38.160 --> 01:33:40.160]  so if you've got a question, let's have it.
[01:33:40.160 --> 01:33:42.160]  I was just going to say this.
[01:33:42.160 --> 01:33:48.160]  This national ID is just a part of what we're dealing with here,
[01:33:48.160 --> 01:33:53.160]  and our government is assuming authority they don't have
[01:33:53.160 --> 01:33:56.160]  because they should be operating on delegated authority,
[01:33:56.160 --> 01:34:02.160]  and they seem to think that they can sweep masses of people
[01:34:02.160 --> 01:34:05.160]  into contractual situations,
[01:34:05.160 --> 01:34:07.160]  and I think you're working on things like that.
[01:34:07.160 --> 01:34:10.160]  That's kind of what we're dealing with a lot,
[01:34:10.160 --> 01:34:16.160]  and our country is really in jeopardy here.
[01:34:16.160 --> 01:34:23.160]  My one case here is a traffic citation in Colorado.
[01:34:23.160 --> 01:34:28.160]  Now, to the court, I gave a set of interrogatories,
[01:34:28.160 --> 01:34:31.160]  a judicial notice and demand for trial of a jury,
[01:34:31.160 --> 01:34:33.160]  a motion for continuance,
[01:34:33.160 --> 01:34:37.160]  and an ominous motion for dismissal.
[01:34:37.160 --> 01:34:42.160]  The interrogatories and the trial by jury,
[01:34:42.160 --> 01:34:46.160]  she just ruled on it by writing on a copy
[01:34:46.160 --> 01:34:48.160]  of the top sheet of the documents,
[01:34:48.160 --> 01:34:50.160]  making a hand note,
[01:34:50.160 --> 01:34:52.160]  and dismissed and that kind of thing
[01:34:52.160 --> 01:34:55.160]  because the traffic rules and regulations
[01:34:55.160 --> 01:34:58.160]  don't permit those things and so forth.
[01:34:58.160 --> 01:35:02.160]  On the ominous motion for dismissal,
[01:35:02.160 --> 01:35:06.160]  we challenged the standing and the causal action and everything,
[01:35:06.160 --> 01:35:12.160]  and when she started the final hearing,
[01:35:12.160 --> 01:35:16.160]  I tried to allude to the fact that the court was in default
[01:35:16.160 --> 01:35:21.160]  in effect because she hadn't addressed the challenge.
[01:35:21.160 --> 01:35:23.160]  Well, Darwin, let me interrupt you for just a second.
[01:35:23.160 --> 01:35:25.160]  You said this is the issue in Colorado?
[01:35:25.160 --> 01:35:26.160]  Yes.
[01:35:26.160 --> 01:35:30.160]  Okay, in Colorado, is a traffic ticket criminal or civil?
[01:35:30.160 --> 01:35:32.160]  I believe it's civil.
[01:35:32.160 --> 01:35:36.160]  Okay, then they can't prevent you from having a jury
[01:35:36.160 --> 01:35:39.160]  because it says right in the Constitution
[01:35:39.160 --> 01:35:43.160]  that any issue at civil trial in excess of $20,
[01:35:43.160 --> 01:35:48.160]  the right to trial by jury shall not be infringed.
[01:35:48.160 --> 01:35:50.160]  Yes, I understand that.
[01:35:50.160 --> 01:35:53.160]  She said the Colorado rules of traffic infractions
[01:35:53.160 --> 01:35:55.160]  do not permit trial by jury.
[01:35:55.160 --> 01:35:57.160]  That's what she made on her note.
[01:35:57.160 --> 01:36:00.160]  Then that's a legislative violation of the Constitution,
[01:36:00.160 --> 01:36:03.160]  and that law is null and void on its face
[01:36:03.160 --> 01:36:05.160]  and needs to be challenged as such.
[01:36:05.160 --> 01:36:07.160]  Yes, yes.
[01:36:07.160 --> 01:36:12.160]  You can tell her what I told the Federal Magistrate in Florida
[01:36:12.160 --> 01:36:16.160]  when she wouldn't allow me to bring cameras in her courtroom.
[01:36:16.160 --> 01:36:21.160]  She said there is a court rule forbidding cameras in the courtroom.
[01:36:21.160 --> 01:36:24.160]  I said, yes, Your Honor, I'm familiar with that rule,
[01:36:24.160 --> 01:36:27.160]  but as I'm sure you know, it's in violation of the First Amendment,
[01:36:27.160 --> 01:36:31.160]  and therefore you may not enforce it.
[01:36:31.160 --> 01:36:35.160]  If they have a rule that's in violation of Constitution,
[01:36:35.160 --> 01:36:39.160]  the court may not enforce it.
[01:36:39.160 --> 01:36:41.160]  That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
[01:36:41.160 --> 01:36:44.160]  Now, on my challenge, when I mentioned to her
[01:36:44.160 --> 01:36:48.160]  that that hadn't been addressed, she said, yes, I ruled on that,
[01:36:48.160 --> 01:36:51.160]  but we haven't seen any ruling,
[01:36:51.160 --> 01:36:55.160]  but I'm sure they have to verify it, they have to prove it.
[01:36:55.160 --> 01:36:58.160]  I would think beyond a reasonable doubt.
[01:36:58.160 --> 01:37:02.160]  And what I'm wondering is, what should I do now?
[01:37:02.160 --> 01:37:06.160]  Judiciary Conduct complained against the judge.
[01:37:06.160 --> 01:37:09.160]  Do you have a ruling on that issue?
[01:37:09.160 --> 01:37:11.160]  She wouldn't give it to me.
[01:37:11.160 --> 01:37:13.160]  She wouldn't say what it was.
[01:37:13.160 --> 01:37:16.160]  Then move to disqualify.
[01:37:16.160 --> 01:37:18.160]  Move to disqualify.
[01:37:18.160 --> 01:37:19.160]  Okay.
[01:37:19.160 --> 01:37:27.160]  Disqualify for cause for official oppression.
[01:37:27.160 --> 01:37:30.160]  You accused her of lying, not at all to you,
[01:37:30.160 --> 01:37:36.160]  lying to you to deny you in the exercise of your right.
[01:37:36.160 --> 01:37:41.160]  And you got official misconduct in Colorado, but you got it.
[01:37:41.160 --> 01:37:42.160]  Okay.
[01:37:42.160 --> 01:37:46.160]  And issue that to her, to the court?
[01:37:46.160 --> 01:37:50.160]  You filed that with, say that again, I'm not sure what you asked.
[01:37:50.160 --> 01:37:54.160]  Where would I file that, just to her at the court?
[01:37:54.160 --> 01:37:59.160]  Let me explain complaints as opposed to complaining.
[01:37:59.160 --> 01:38:00.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:38:00.160 --> 01:38:04.160]  Anytime you try to file a criminal accusation,
[01:38:04.160 --> 01:38:06.160]  you will be directed to the police department,
[01:38:06.160 --> 01:38:11.160]  and the police department will provide you with a voluntary statement.
[01:38:11.160 --> 01:38:14.160]  A voluntary statement is complaining.
[01:38:14.160 --> 01:38:18.160]  It is not a criminal complaint.
[01:38:18.160 --> 01:38:23.160]  Criminal complaints are never directed to police officers.
[01:38:23.160 --> 01:38:28.160]  They are always directed to some magistrate.
[01:38:28.160 --> 01:38:32.160]  Now, you can present a criminal complaint to a prosecuting attorney,
[01:38:32.160 --> 01:38:36.160]  and the prosecuting attorney is required to present it to some magistrate.
[01:38:36.160 --> 01:38:41.160]  I suggest you present it to the magistrate in the first instance.
[01:38:41.160 --> 01:38:42.160]  Okay.
[01:38:42.160 --> 01:38:48.160]  Then demand that the magistrate act in accordance with law.
[01:38:48.160 --> 01:38:54.160]  And the criminal complaint is a very specific document.
[01:38:54.160 --> 01:39:00.160]  You can look in any criminal case in Colorado and find a criminal complaint
[01:39:00.160 --> 01:39:06.160]  and look at the form they use and construct your complaint in accordance with that form.
[01:39:06.160 --> 01:39:08.160]  Or you can look at an information.
[01:39:08.160 --> 01:39:14.160]  An information looks just like a complaint except it's prepared by the prosecuting attorney.
[01:39:14.160 --> 01:39:19.160]  The purpose of that is, is criminal complaints are intended to be prepared
[01:39:19.160 --> 01:39:24.160]  and filed by citizens, not learning counsel.
[01:39:24.160 --> 01:39:30.160]  So when learning counsel receives a complaint from a non-learning counsel,
[01:39:30.160 --> 01:39:33.160]  he's to prepare an information based on the complaint,
[01:39:33.160 --> 01:39:38.160]  and the information is intended to be complete in accordance with law.
[01:39:38.160 --> 01:39:45.160]  So if you look at an information and just change the title from information to complaint,
[01:39:45.160 --> 01:39:48.160]  you'll essentially have a complaint.
[01:39:48.160 --> 01:39:49.160]  Okay.
[01:39:49.160 --> 01:39:55.160]  Except that you may have to add the paragraph in Texas and in a number of states.
[01:39:55.160 --> 01:40:00.160]  It says that the complaint must run in the name of the state.
[01:40:00.160 --> 01:40:05.160]  So look at a complaint form and it will probably say,
[01:40:05.160 --> 01:40:10.160]  in the name of and under the authority of the state of Texas or the state of Colorado.
[01:40:10.160 --> 01:40:12.160]  Okay.
[01:40:12.160 --> 01:40:21.160]  I, your name, have reason to believe or do believe based on the following brief explanation
[01:40:21.160 --> 01:40:29.160]  that this certain person violated this penal act or committed this act.
[01:40:29.160 --> 01:40:34.160]  I generally put this person committed, I put the name of the act,
[01:40:34.160 --> 01:40:41.160]  official misconduct in violation of the specific statute
[01:40:41.160 --> 01:40:43.160]  against the peace and dignity of the state.
[01:40:43.160 --> 01:40:50.160]  And then it's signed before a magistrate and before a notary and verified.
[01:40:50.160 --> 01:40:53.160]  That is a complaint.
[01:40:53.160 --> 01:40:56.160]  When you use complaint out here on the street,
[01:40:56.160 --> 01:40:59.160]  it has a different meaning than when you use it in court.
[01:40:59.160 --> 01:41:02.160]  In court, it is a form of art.
[01:41:02.160 --> 01:41:07.160]  It has a specific meaning, so they like to do this little song and dance with meaning.
[01:41:07.160 --> 01:41:14.160]  When you understand the difference, the filing of a complaint invokes a duty.
[01:41:14.160 --> 01:41:16.160]  Complaining does not invoke the duty.
[01:41:16.160 --> 01:41:21.160]  So file the complaint with a magistrate because that's what they're always directed to.
[01:41:21.160 --> 01:41:26.160]  And that has been the case since 1216, since the signing of the Magna Carta,
[01:41:26.160 --> 01:41:30.160]  a well-established legal basis.
[01:41:30.160 --> 01:41:38.160]  And then when the magistrate fails to present it to the clerk of the court,
[01:41:38.160 --> 01:41:43.160]  then you go to the prosecuting attorney with a complaint against the magistrate
[01:41:43.160 --> 01:41:47.160]  who will absolutely refuse to act on it.
[01:41:47.160 --> 01:41:57.160]  You go find the highest level judge you can find and give him a complaint against the prosecuting attorney.
[01:41:57.160 --> 01:42:03.160]  And when he refuses to act, now you go to the grand jury with a complaint
[01:42:03.160 --> 01:42:10.160]  against the highest judge you can find for shielding criminal complaints against the district attorney.
[01:42:10.160 --> 01:42:15.160]  When people try to get to a grand jury, it's always the district attorney that interferes.
[01:42:15.160 --> 01:42:19.160]  But now you're going with a complaint against him.
[01:42:19.160 --> 01:42:24.160]  So you tie him up. You compromise him.
[01:42:24.160 --> 01:42:30.160]  Whether you get to the grand jury or not, you will get their attention.
[01:42:30.160 --> 01:42:37.160]  And this judge you're trying to file against is going to be a real unhappy camper.
[01:42:37.160 --> 01:42:41.160]  But he's not going to say a word to you.
[01:42:41.160 --> 01:42:46.160]  And one of the reasons I suggest you walk your way up to the top as quickly as possible,
[01:42:46.160 --> 01:42:55.160]  if after that a bailiff, a police officer, anyone says or does anything
[01:42:55.160 --> 01:43:01.160]  that in any way can be construed as threatening or intimidating,
[01:43:01.160 --> 01:43:08.160]  you accuse that highest judge you can find of personally sending that officer
[01:43:08.160 --> 01:43:15.160]  to harass you and intimidate you in order to tamper with a witness.
[01:43:15.160 --> 01:43:23.160]  And I guarantee you when you do that, that judge is going to go ballistic.
[01:43:23.160 --> 01:43:30.160]  And then when you come back to the court, you will accede to the level of royalty.
[01:43:30.160 --> 01:43:35.160]  It will keep the police from trying to harass you because you'll terrify them.
[01:43:35.160 --> 01:43:40.160]  They know every word they say to you is going to get a complaint against this judge.
[01:43:40.160 --> 01:43:45.160]  You're going to become persona non grata.
[01:43:45.160 --> 01:43:47.160]  Leave this guy alone.
[01:43:47.160 --> 01:43:50.160]  But this builds politics. This builds pressure.
[01:43:50.160 --> 01:43:52.160]  We'll get back to this on the other side.
[01:43:52.160 --> 01:43:56.160]  Okay.
[01:43:56.160 --> 01:44:00.160]  We'll be right back. I can't see my caller pages.
[01:44:00.160 --> 01:44:04.160]  Warning for all Gulf Coast disaster survivors.
[01:44:04.160 --> 01:44:08.160]  Keep in mind that dangerous gases are in the air you breathe.
[01:44:08.160 --> 01:44:12.160]  Benzene, hydrogen sulfide, methylene chloride and Corexit 9500.
[01:44:12.160 --> 01:44:15.160]  Keep your body clean with micro plant powder.
[01:44:15.160 --> 01:44:18.160]  For all Gulf Coast residents and all who want to be healthy,
[01:44:18.160 --> 01:44:23.160]  hempusa.org brings you a new formulation of micro plant powder
[01:44:23.160 --> 01:44:26.160]  with lactobacillus acidophilus, rebuilding your immune system
[01:44:26.160 --> 01:44:30.160]  while detoxing the rest of your body, pulling out positive toxins,
[01:44:30.160 --> 01:44:33.160]  heavy metals, viruses, fungus, bacteria and parasites.
[01:44:33.160 --> 01:44:36.160]  It cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach and colon.
[01:44:36.160 --> 01:44:40.160]  Micro plant powder will help eliminate these dangerous chemicals from the body
[01:44:40.160 --> 01:44:42.160]  used in the Gulf cleaned up.
[01:44:42.160 --> 01:44:46.160]  At hempusa.org we want you to try our number one selling detox product,
[01:44:46.160 --> 01:44:48.160]  micro plant powder.
[01:44:48.160 --> 01:44:55.160]  Call and order at 1-908-69-126-08, 1-908-69-126-08
[01:44:55.160 --> 01:45:00.160]  or visit us at hempusa.org today.
[01:45:00.160 --> 01:45:03.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.160 --> 01:45:06.160]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.160 --> 01:45:10.160]  the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course
[01:45:10.160 --> 01:45:14.160]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.160 --> 01:45:18.160]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.160 --> 01:45:22.160]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.160 --> 01:45:27.160]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:27.160 --> 01:45:30.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:30.160 --> 01:45:33.160]  with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.160 --> 01:45:38.160]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.160 --> 01:45:42.160]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.160 --> 01:45:47.160]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:47.160 --> 01:45:51.160]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:51.160 --> 01:45:55.160]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.160 --> 01:46:00.160]  or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.160 --> 01:46:27.160]  Thank you.
[01:46:27.160 --> 01:46:54.160]  Thank you.
[01:46:54.160 --> 01:47:02.160]  Hi folks, we are back.
[01:47:02.160 --> 01:47:06.160]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton there for Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:47:06.160 --> 01:47:10.160]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:47:10.160 --> 01:47:13.160]  We have just a little over two hours left in the show,
[01:47:13.160 --> 01:47:15.160]  so if you have any issues or questions,
[01:47:15.160 --> 01:47:18.160]  that would be a great time to get in line to get a mask.
[01:47:18.160 --> 01:47:25.160]  All right, Randy, let's go back to Darwin.
[01:47:25.160 --> 01:47:26.160]  Darwin, you there?
[01:47:26.160 --> 01:47:27.160]  I'm here.
[01:47:27.160 --> 01:47:31.160]  You had mentioned to go to the magistrate in the first instance.
[01:47:31.160 --> 01:47:36.160]  So do I file this with the judge that's been hearing this case from the beginning?
[01:47:36.160 --> 01:47:39.160]  Not if he is the one you're filing against.
[01:47:39.160 --> 01:47:43.160]  Okay, should I go to the district senior judge then?
[01:47:43.160 --> 01:47:46.160]  No, don't go to him yet.
[01:47:46.160 --> 01:47:48.160]  Leave him in reserve.
[01:47:48.160 --> 01:47:49.160]  Okay.
[01:47:49.160 --> 01:47:53.160]  You want to go to some other chump, low-level judge.
[01:47:53.160 --> 01:47:54.160]  Okay.
[01:47:54.160 --> 01:47:58.160]  Who will just blow you off without even thinking about it.
[01:47:58.160 --> 01:47:59.160]  Okay.
[01:47:59.160 --> 01:48:04.160]  But then you go to the prosecutor with a charge against that judge.
[01:48:04.160 --> 01:48:09.160]  And the last thing a prosecutor wants is to go after a judge.
[01:48:09.160 --> 01:48:11.160]  So he'll refuse to do his duty.
[01:48:11.160 --> 01:48:14.160]  And I suggest you do all this by the mail.
[01:48:14.160 --> 01:48:15.160]  Yes.
[01:48:15.160 --> 01:48:17.160]  You don't want them to see you.
[01:48:17.160 --> 01:48:21.160]  You don't want them to be able to look at you and evaluate you.
[01:48:21.160 --> 01:48:26.160]  You want their imaginations running wild with them.
[01:48:26.160 --> 01:48:33.160]  So you mail a verified criminal affidavit to the magistrate and include a stamp
[01:48:33.160 --> 01:48:39.160]  self-addressed envelope and a letter asking the magistrate to return this
[01:48:39.160 --> 01:48:45.160]  letter notifying you of when he intends to present the, file the complaint
[01:48:45.160 --> 01:48:47.160]  with the clerk of the court.
[01:48:47.160 --> 01:48:48.160]  Okay.
[01:48:48.160 --> 01:48:53.160]  And when you don't get a response, then you go to, you send the one to the
[01:48:53.160 --> 01:48:58.160]  district attorney against the judge and accuse the judge of mis-easance in
[01:48:58.160 --> 01:49:04.160]  office and shielding from prosecution and whatever else you control in there
[01:49:04.160 --> 01:49:07.160]  just for the heck of it.
[01:49:07.160 --> 01:49:09.160]  Same kind of letter.
[01:49:09.160 --> 01:49:11.160]  You don't get a response.
[01:49:11.160 --> 01:49:16.160]  You do this to the judge, to the highest level judge you can find.
[01:49:16.160 --> 01:49:22.160]  And then your next one, I like to go when I'm going to the grand jury, I
[01:49:22.160 --> 01:49:28.160]  like to do that in person, but I don't suggest other people do it.
[01:49:28.160 --> 01:49:32.160]  Send a set of complaints.
[01:49:32.160 --> 01:49:37.160]  I think you have 23 grand jurors in Colorado.
[01:49:37.160 --> 01:49:42.160]  So send 23 envelopes to the district attorney's office addressed to the
[01:49:42.160 --> 01:49:49.160]  foreman of the grand jury in grand jury one through 22.
[01:49:49.160 --> 01:49:57.160]  Send it, send the one to the foreman registered restricted with a letter in
[01:49:57.160 --> 01:50:01.160]  there asking him to initial it and return it to you so that you know that
[01:50:01.160 --> 01:50:05.160]  he actually received it because you have problems with the district attorney
[01:50:05.160 --> 01:50:12.160]  shielding criminal complaints against himself from the grand jury.
[01:50:12.160 --> 01:50:17.160]  When you don't get that one back, then you go back to another district judge
[01:50:17.160 --> 01:50:21.160]  and ask the judge for a writ of mandamus.
[01:50:21.160 --> 01:50:28.160]  This is all about stirring up as much problem in the court as you can and
[01:50:28.160 --> 01:50:37.160]  demonstrating to them everything you do is going to make it worse.
[01:50:37.160 --> 01:50:41.160]  No matter what you do, I'm going to come back and I'm going to sting somebody
[01:50:41.160 --> 01:50:44.160]  else.
[01:50:44.160 --> 01:50:50.160]  Now, you most likely won't get any feedback unless it's from a smart mouth
[01:50:50.160 --> 01:50:54.160]  police officer or bailiff.
[01:50:54.160 --> 01:51:00.160]  The first time you can encourage one of those to act ignorant, like if you go
[01:51:00.160 --> 01:51:05.160]  down to the courts or something and for something totally different and a
[01:51:05.160 --> 01:51:11.160]  bailiff gives you some crapola, nail it, accusing the judge of sending him
[01:51:11.160 --> 01:51:16.160]  down there to harass you and intimidate you just because you filed criminal
[01:51:16.160 --> 01:51:18.160]  charges against the judge.
[01:51:18.160 --> 01:51:24.160]  I'm telling you, this will drive them crazy and it's not because they're
[01:51:24.160 --> 01:51:26.160]  afraid of you.
[01:51:26.160 --> 01:51:29.160]  It's about politics.
[01:51:29.160 --> 01:51:36.160]  Everybody who's in a position of power and authority knows that everybody
[01:51:36.160 --> 01:51:39.160]  below him is looking at his position.
[01:51:39.160 --> 01:51:45.160]  The higher position you're in, the more people are looking to your position.
[01:51:45.160 --> 01:51:50.160]  What you're doing by this is creating cannon fodder that one of their enemies
[01:51:50.160 --> 01:51:55.160]  can use to unseat them from office.
[01:51:55.160 --> 01:51:57.160]  It's not that they're afraid of you.
[01:51:57.160 --> 01:51:59.160]  They're afraid of the politics.
[01:51:59.160 --> 01:52:02.160]  They're swimming in a pool full of sharks.
[01:52:02.160 --> 01:52:06.160]  They're afraid one of these other sharks are going to take this information
[01:52:06.160 --> 01:52:09.160]  and use it to bite them with.
[01:52:09.160 --> 01:52:12.160]  This is where we get our clout.
[01:52:12.160 --> 01:52:16.160]  We need to understand this because they're not going to do what they're
[01:52:16.160 --> 01:52:18.160]  supposed to do.
[01:52:18.160 --> 01:52:21.160]  Generally when people try to get a public official to do what he's supposed
[01:52:21.160 --> 01:52:25.160]  to do and he doesn't do it, they feel defeated.
[01:52:25.160 --> 01:52:29.160]  They feel betrayed.
[01:52:29.160 --> 01:52:31.160]  They don't.
[01:52:31.160 --> 01:52:36.160]  When I ask a public official to do something, I hope he doesn't because
[01:52:36.160 --> 01:52:40.160]  that gives me a crack at it and that gives me an opportunity to put my boot
[01:52:40.160 --> 01:52:46.160]  in his tush and it gives me an opportunity to set up his boss to do the
[01:52:46.160 --> 01:52:49.160]  same thing with him.
[01:52:49.160 --> 01:52:53.160]  We start doing this, we'll give that court on the end reason to start
[01:52:53.160 --> 01:52:55.160]  following law.
[01:52:55.160 --> 01:52:58.160]  So that's my story.
[01:52:58.160 --> 01:53:00.160]  Do you have any other questions?
[01:53:00.160 --> 01:53:02.160]  Did I answer your questions?
[01:53:02.160 --> 01:53:04.160]  You've done awfully well.
[01:53:04.160 --> 01:53:07.160]  I might say this just in case it's important.
[01:53:07.160 --> 01:53:10.160]  So far there hasn't been a prosecutor in this.
[01:53:10.160 --> 01:53:14.160]  The police officer I would say is acting as the prosecutor.
[01:53:14.160 --> 01:53:17.160]  Hold on, is this a municipality?
[01:53:17.160 --> 01:53:19.160]  Yes.
[01:53:19.160 --> 01:53:24.160]  Charge the police officer with the illegal practice of law.
[01:53:24.160 --> 01:53:27.160]  The municipality is a corporation.
[01:53:27.160 --> 01:53:35.160]  A corporation must, is not a viable physical entity.
[01:53:35.160 --> 01:53:40.160]  Must be represented in court by learned counsel.
[01:53:40.160 --> 01:53:42.160]  You have only one problem.
[01:53:42.160 --> 01:53:44.160]  They're not moving against him as the municipality.
[01:53:44.160 --> 01:53:47.160]  They're moving against him as the state or the people.
[01:53:47.160 --> 01:53:50.160]  That's correct.
[01:53:50.160 --> 01:53:52.160]  That's correct.
[01:53:52.160 --> 01:53:56.160]  Is the state, does the municipality have the authority to represent the
[01:53:56.160 --> 01:53:58.160]  state?
[01:53:58.160 --> 01:54:04.160]  Eddie's arguing they don't here in Texas.
[01:54:04.160 --> 01:54:06.160]  We don't care.
[01:54:06.160 --> 01:54:08.160]  Okay.
[01:54:08.160 --> 01:54:10.160]  Then you make the argument.
[01:54:10.160 --> 01:54:12.160]  They're not going to accept the complaint.
[01:54:12.160 --> 01:54:14.160]  That's a really good place to start.
[01:54:14.160 --> 01:54:20.160]  You accuse him of impersonating a practicing law without a license.
[01:54:20.160 --> 01:54:26.160]  Where does a police officer get authority to act as a prosecuting
[01:54:26.160 --> 01:54:29.160]  attorney?
[01:54:29.160 --> 01:54:31.160]  This is a criminal case.
[01:54:31.160 --> 01:54:37.160]  If the police officer can prosecute a criminal accusation, then a citizen
[01:54:37.160 --> 01:54:42.160]  can prosecute a criminal accusation.
[01:54:42.160 --> 01:54:48.160]  If a citizen can't prosecute a criminal accusation, where does a police
[01:54:48.160 --> 01:54:53.160]  officer get authority?
[01:54:53.160 --> 01:54:57.160]  He's going to claim he's just there as a witness.
[01:54:57.160 --> 01:55:02.160]  Well, you're going to maintain he can't examine himself.
[01:55:02.160 --> 01:55:10.160]  If he asks the questions and answers them, then he's counseled.
[01:55:10.160 --> 01:55:16.160]  Unless you have private prosecutions in Colorado, which you do not, he has
[01:55:16.160 --> 01:55:18.160]  no standing.
[01:55:18.160 --> 01:55:20.160]  Yes, that's right.
[01:55:20.160 --> 01:55:22.160]  Go after him.
[01:55:22.160 --> 01:55:26.160]  This is not an argument they're going to want to get in front of a higher
[01:55:26.160 --> 01:55:31.160]  court because then they'll have to start hiring prosecutors.
[01:55:31.160 --> 01:55:34.160]  That will cost them money.
[01:55:34.160 --> 01:55:38.160]  As far as prosecutors are concerned, you don't care about the one in the
[01:55:38.160 --> 01:55:41.160]  original court anyway.
[01:55:41.160 --> 01:55:46.160]  The prosecutor I'm talking about is the district attorney.
[01:55:46.160 --> 01:55:51.160]  The highest level prosecutor you can find because that's always where
[01:55:51.160 --> 01:55:57.160]  criminal complaints against public officials will go.
[01:55:57.160 --> 01:56:01.160]  You want the highest level people you can.
[01:56:01.160 --> 01:56:09.160]  You want entities that have nothing to do with whoever you're filing the
[01:56:09.160 --> 01:56:12.160]  complaints against.
[01:56:12.160 --> 01:56:17.160]  Being the sovereign citizen, you can go straight to the top.
[01:56:17.160 --> 01:56:22.160]  You don't have to fool around with these low-level underlings.
[01:56:22.160 --> 01:56:25.160]  That's how I would take this one.
[01:56:25.160 --> 01:56:26.160]  All right.
[01:56:26.160 --> 01:56:29.160]  Just one warning.
[01:56:29.160 --> 01:56:32.160]  Don't have too much fun with it.
[01:56:32.160 --> 01:56:35.160]  No, no, no.
[01:56:35.160 --> 01:56:42.160]  We'll get to be fun once you watch them do that kick dance they do.
[01:56:42.160 --> 01:56:43.160]  Go ahead.
[01:56:43.160 --> 01:56:50.160]  So move the disqualified for cause of judicial depression and against the
[01:56:50.160 --> 01:56:51.160]  officer.
[01:56:51.160 --> 01:56:52.160]  Both.
[01:56:52.160 --> 01:56:53.160]  Yes.
[01:56:53.160 --> 01:56:56.160]  They may be done in the same complaint?
[01:56:56.160 --> 01:56:57.160]  No, no.
[01:56:57.160 --> 01:57:02.160]  Never put more than one accusation in a complaint.
[01:57:02.160 --> 01:57:03.160]  Okay.
[01:57:03.160 --> 01:57:08.160]  If you have three separate accusations against an officer, you make each one
[01:57:08.160 --> 01:57:10.160]  of those a separate complaint.
[01:57:10.160 --> 01:57:11.160]  All right.
[01:57:11.160 --> 01:57:12.160]  Good to know.
[01:57:12.160 --> 01:57:18.160]  That way they each have to be dealt with individually, and a screw up on
[01:57:18.160 --> 01:57:23.160]  any one of them is a separate accusation against each one of them.
[01:57:23.160 --> 01:57:24.160]  All right.
[01:57:24.160 --> 01:57:30.160]  Now, in case this is pertinent, on the final hearing, the judge started the
[01:57:30.160 --> 01:57:31.160]  hearing.
[01:57:31.160 --> 01:57:36.160]  Then the police officer, they said that my son could record it, and then the
[01:57:36.160 --> 01:57:41.160]  police officer complained about that and complained about my son acting as an
[01:57:41.160 --> 01:57:44.160]  attorney, really upsetting.
[01:57:44.160 --> 01:57:49.160]  And the judge finally postponed the hearing again, and they had started this
[01:57:49.160 --> 01:57:54.160]  hearing without addressing the challenge of jurisdiction and so forth of
[01:57:54.160 --> 01:57:55.160]  standing.
[01:57:55.160 --> 01:57:56.160]  Now, wait a minute.
[01:57:56.160 --> 01:58:01.160]  The police officer who was impersonating an attorney got upset because your
[01:58:01.160 --> 01:58:03.160]  son was acting as an attorney?
[01:58:03.160 --> 01:58:04.160]  Yes.
[01:58:04.160 --> 01:58:05.160]  Yes.
[01:58:05.160 --> 01:58:07.160]  That's what I was thinking.
[01:58:07.160 --> 01:58:12.160]  Well, Mr. Pot, I got a kettle to throw at you.
[01:58:12.160 --> 01:58:14.160]  So he stepped into that one big time.
[01:58:14.160 --> 01:58:16.160]  He raised an objection.
[01:58:16.160 --> 01:58:19.160]  If he raised an objection, he's acting as counsel.
[01:58:19.160 --> 01:58:20.160]  Yes.
[01:58:20.160 --> 01:58:23.160]  He has no way of getting around that.
[01:58:23.160 --> 01:58:24.160]  Okay.
[01:58:24.160 --> 01:58:28.160]  This is Randy Kelkin, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, and Groupile Radio.
[01:58:28.160 --> 01:58:30.160]  Darwin, do you have anything for us on the other side?
[01:58:30.160 --> 01:58:32.160]  You've done awfully well.
[01:58:32.160 --> 01:58:35.160]  I hope we can check back with you again, and thank you for what you're doing,
[01:58:35.160 --> 01:58:36.160]  and I hope you keep up.
[01:58:36.160 --> 01:58:37.160]  Okay.
[01:58:37.160 --> 01:58:38.160]  Thank you very much.
[01:58:38.160 --> 01:58:41.160]  When we come back, I'll go to Jeff in Arkansas.
[01:58:41.160 --> 01:58:48.160]  If you have any questions or comments, call us at 512-646-1984.
[01:58:48.160 --> 01:58:51.160]  This is our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:51.160 --> 01:58:54.160]  We're at the top of the hour break.
[01:58:54.160 --> 01:58:58.160]  When we get back, we could use a few more callers and ask us some really
[01:58:58.160 --> 01:58:59.160]  hard questions.
[01:58:59.160 --> 01:59:04.160]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are
[01:59:04.160 --> 01:59:07.160]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:59:07.160 --> 01:59:12.160]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process
[01:59:12.160 --> 01:59:16.160]  can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:16.160 --> 01:59:18.160]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:18.160 --> 01:59:23.160]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real
[01:59:23.160 --> 01:59:27.160]  story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:27.160 --> 01:59:32.160]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an
[01:59:32.160 --> 01:59:36.160]  entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced
[01:59:36.160 --> 01:59:37.160]  before.
[01:59:37.160 --> 01:59:41.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for
[01:59:41.160 --> 01:59:42.160]  the asking.
[01:59:42.160 --> 01:59:47.160]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll
[01:59:47.160 --> 01:59:57.160]  free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:57.160 --> 02:00:02.160]  That's freestudybible.com.