[00:00.000 --> 00:09.080] Fox News announced Wednesday it is dropping conservative commentator Glenn Beck's daily [00:09.080 --> 00:10.080] talk show. [00:10.080 --> 00:14.140] Beck, a darling of the Tea Party, is noted for his conspiracy theories of communist and [00:14.140 --> 00:17.120] Muslim plots to overthrow the U.S. government. [00:17.120 --> 00:23.060] In January, several rabbis called on Fox News to sanction Beck for repeated use of Nazi and [00:23.060 --> 00:24.900] Holocaust imagery. [00:24.900 --> 00:29.480] Beck's ratings for the first quarter of this year were down 30 percent. [00:29.480 --> 00:34.760] WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been given a hearing July 12 at the High Court [00:34.760 --> 00:38.640] in London for his appeal against extradition to Sweden. [00:38.640 --> 00:44.200] Assange is appealing against a ruling by Judge Howard Riddle that extradition would not breach [00:44.200 --> 00:45.200] his human rights. [00:45.200 --> 00:50.800] He has denied allegations of sexual assault and rape, saying they were politically motivated. [00:50.800 --> 00:56.960] If his appeal is unsuccessful, Assange could take his case to the U.K.'s highest court. [00:56.960 --> 01:02.800] The U.S. Thursday expelled the Ecuadorian ambassador to Washington, retaliating for [01:02.800 --> 01:08.280] Ecuador's expulsion of the U.S. ambassador earlier this week over a WikiLeaks cable. [01:08.280 --> 01:13.660] The cable quoted U.S. Ambassador Heather Hodges as saying President Rafael Correa knowingly [01:13.660 --> 01:15.760] appointed a corrupt chief of police. [01:15.760 --> 01:20.880] U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met Correa a year ago in an effort to drive a [01:20.880 --> 01:25.880] wedge between him and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. [01:25.880 --> 01:31.520] Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says Japan's nuclear disaster and the global [01:31.520 --> 01:36.840] recession provide stark lessons on society's failure to manage risk. [01:36.840 --> 01:42.280] Stiglitz writes, quote, the consequences for the Japanese earthquake, especially the crisis [01:42.280 --> 01:47.840] at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, resonate grimly for observers of the American financial [01:47.840 --> 01:51.040] crash that precipitated the Great Recession. [01:51.040 --> 01:56.440] Stiglitz says both events provide stark lessons about risks and the lack of capacity markets [01:56.440 --> 01:59.840] have on managing them. [01:59.840 --> 02:05.880] The funeral of Juliano Merkamis, internationally renowned actor, director and political activist, [02:05.880 --> 02:09.040] was held in both Israel and Palestine Wednesday. [02:09.040 --> 02:14.760] Merkamis of Jewish and Arab descent was shot Monday by masked gunman outside his beloved [02:14.760 --> 02:17.800] Freedom Theater in the Jenin refugee camp. [02:17.800 --> 02:23.280] Merkamis advocated a one-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, envisaging a world [02:23.280 --> 02:28.000] without partitions, loyalty oaths, air raids or suicide bombings. [02:28.000 --> 02:32.280] His coffin was brought from Israel into the West Bank so that Palestinians, unable to [02:32.280 --> 02:36.920] get permits to attend the burial in Israel, could bid him farewell. [02:36.920 --> 02:43.980] Merkamis founded the Freedom Theater in 2006 with Zakaria Zoubedi, a former leader of Al-Aqsa [02:43.980 --> 02:49.360] martyrs brigades, offering the youth of Jenin a chance to oppose Israeli occupation other [02:49.360 --> 02:50.640] than through arms. [02:50.640 --> 02:56.200] However, the Freedom Theater's staff and supporters say Palestinians may resist the Israeli occupation [02:56.200 --> 02:57.200] by all means. [02:57.200 --> 03:15.200] You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at RuleOfLawRadio.com, live free [03:15.200 --> 03:45.000] speech talk radio at its best. [04:16.160 --> 04:40.200] ...Rule of Law, what are you going to do when we come for you, you bad boys, bad boys, [04:40.200 --> 04:43.960] bad boys here on the Rule of Law, RuleOfLawRadio.com? [04:43.960 --> 04:45.180] I'm Deborah Stephens. [04:45.180 --> 04:49.020] We are here with Randy Kelton and Eddie Craig. [04:49.020 --> 04:51.740] We'll be taking your calls this evening. [04:51.740 --> 04:54.980] And before we start in, Randy has some things that he wants [04:54.980 --> 04:56.820] to discuss tonight concerning mortgage issues. [04:56.820 --> 04:59.260] But before we go to Randy, I just wanted, [04:59.260 --> 05:01.320] I have an announcement to make. [05:01.320 --> 05:06.500] Just got the email in the inbox, House Bill 439. [05:06.500 --> 05:09.540] This is relating to the authority of the Department [05:09.540 --> 05:11.800] of Public Safety of the State of Texas [05:11.800 --> 05:14.720] and certain local law enforcement agencies [05:14.720 --> 05:19.020] to establish a checkpoint on a highway or street [05:19.020 --> 05:23.760] to determine whether persons are driving while intoxicated. [05:23.760 --> 05:27.160] This bill that we, everybody needs to get [05:27.160 --> 05:30.200] out to the legislature, to the committee hearing [05:30.200 --> 05:32.520] to oppose this bill. [05:32.520 --> 05:36.900] The committee hearing is going to be this coming Tuesday. [05:36.900 --> 05:39.640] That is April 12th, this Tuesday. [05:39.640 --> 05:42.380] And again, we never know what time they're going [05:42.380 --> 05:45.500] to hear the bill, but just be ready to go down there [05:45.500 --> 05:48.940] to the Capitol at some point during the day or evening [05:48.940 --> 05:53.140] and at least drop off a card or you actually fill it [05:53.140 --> 05:55.380] out once you get to the committee hearing and drop it off [05:55.380 --> 05:58.020] with the clerk saying that you are opposed to the bill. [05:58.020 --> 06:03.660] If possible, try to stay down there and speak on this issue. [06:03.660 --> 06:05.860] Now, we've talked about this somewhat before, [06:05.860 --> 06:09.740] how this is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, [06:09.740 --> 06:13.840] illegal arrest, illegal search and seizure, [06:13.840 --> 06:15.780] and we've got to put a stop to this. [06:15.780 --> 06:20.660] Texas is actually only one of about 12 or 13 states right now [06:20.660 --> 06:23.940] where they don't have these so-called sobriety checkpoints [06:23.940 --> 06:28.120] which is just an excuse for the cops to rummage through your car [06:28.120 --> 06:30.180] and arrest you for no good reason. [06:30.180 --> 06:32.180] So we've got to put a stop to that bill. [06:32.180 --> 06:33.800] Now, speaking of committee hearings, [06:33.800 --> 06:37.940] I just wanted to give a recap from yesterday. [06:37.940 --> 06:43.220] We did go down to the committee hearing on House Bill 1938. [06:43.220 --> 06:47.820] That was a bill that we went to support concerning the prohibition [06:47.820 --> 06:52.180] of the full body scanners in airports in Texas. [06:52.180 --> 06:55.880] And it wasn't as dramatic of a hearing as the hearing [06:55.880 --> 07:01.420] on the no touching and in all honesty, actually the bill [07:01.420 --> 07:03.940] that would prohibit the inappropriate touching is [07:03.940 --> 07:05.760] actually much more important. [07:05.760 --> 07:09.140] Yes, we need to banish the naked body scanners too, [07:09.140 --> 07:14.180] but Randy and I were discussing on the way back from the hearing [07:14.180 --> 07:16.500] that actually it's much more important [07:16.500 --> 07:19.620] for the no touching bill to pass and here's why. [07:19.620 --> 07:23.500] Because if they banish the naked body scanners [07:23.500 --> 07:27.620] but they don't banish the inappropriate touching, [07:27.620 --> 07:29.580] that's a problem, all right. [07:29.580 --> 07:33.340] And even if they allow the naked body scanners, [07:33.340 --> 07:37.220] as long as they banish the no touching, hey, you're in the clear [07:37.220 --> 07:40.460] because you just opt out of the naked body scanner and go [07:40.460 --> 07:41.980] through the metal detector like normal [07:41.980 --> 07:43.540] and they don't put your hands on you. [07:43.540 --> 07:47.700] So actually the no touching is much, much more important. [07:47.700 --> 07:53.140] But we need to make sure that both get prohibited at any rate. [07:53.140 --> 07:55.980] It's best to have both, but worst case scenario, [07:55.980 --> 07:57.340] we have to get the no touching. [07:57.340 --> 07:58.940] Now, we've already had that hearing on that one. [07:58.940 --> 08:00.540] That was a couple of weeks ago. [08:00.540 --> 08:04.100] This hearing was yesterday afternoon. [08:04.100 --> 08:07.660] The house was in session until about 4.30 p.m. [08:07.660 --> 08:12.340] and so I was watching live on the internet and I knew [08:12.340 --> 08:13.700] when they adjourned and that's [08:13.700 --> 08:15.100] when the committee hearings start. [08:15.100 --> 08:17.980] And so we rushed down there, a bunch of people rushed [08:17.980 --> 08:21.220] down there, I had some people on my text message and email list [08:21.220 --> 08:25.900] to text and email to get everyone out there. [08:25.900 --> 08:28.980] And so by the time we got down there, I was expecting [08:28.980 --> 08:32.020] to just put a card in and come back and produce shows [08:32.020 --> 08:33.940] and then go back way later in the evening [08:33.940 --> 08:36.060] because that's what happened with the other bill. [08:36.060 --> 08:37.780] Well, that's not the way it worked with this one. [08:37.780 --> 08:40.340] We got down there and they were hearing the bill [08:40.340 --> 08:41.380] when we walked in the door. [08:41.380 --> 08:43.740] I was like, oh man, I'm glad we got here when we did. [08:43.740 --> 08:45.340] Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to speak. [08:45.340 --> 08:47.220] So Randy and I both spoke. [08:47.220 --> 08:48.380] I'd say probably about a dozen [08:48.380 --> 08:50.420] or so people spoke while we were there. [08:50.420 --> 08:53.020] I don't know how many people spoke before we were there, [08:53.020 --> 08:55.660] but the hearing on that particular bill while we were [08:55.660 --> 08:58.060] there probably only went about 45 minutes. [08:58.060 --> 09:00.660] I suspect it was being heard for about, you know, [09:00.660 --> 09:02.860] 20, 30 minutes before we got there. [09:02.860 --> 09:06.140] So there was a good number of people that went down there [09:06.140 --> 09:08.540] and spoke in favor of the bill. [09:08.540 --> 09:10.860] And after that, I know there was a good number of people [09:10.860 --> 09:13.460] that went down there and submitted the cards even [09:13.460 --> 09:14.620] after the bill had been heard. [09:14.620 --> 09:17.460] So just wanted to give a recap on that. [09:17.460 --> 09:20.900] The committee seemed very favorable to the bill. [09:20.900 --> 09:23.940] I think many of them have already signed onto the bill. [09:23.940 --> 09:26.740] Now, speaking of the numbers, [09:26.740 --> 09:29.300] I'm having a really good feeling about both of these bills. [09:29.300 --> 09:33.220] The House Bill 1937 concerning the no touching, [09:33.220 --> 09:38.220] that bill has 51 co-authors along with the joint author [09:41.740 --> 09:46.740] and along with the main author and five joint authors. [09:47.140 --> 09:52.140] So we've got like 56, 57 house reps that have signed on [09:52.140 --> 09:56.820] as co-authors of this bill altogether. [09:56.820 --> 09:59.540] And there's only 150 members of the House. [09:59.540 --> 10:03.180] So folks, we've already got a third of the House [10:03.180 --> 10:05.620] is in support of this bill. [10:05.620 --> 10:10.180] So I'm thinking it's not going to take very much [10:10.180 --> 10:11.500] for this bill to pass. [10:11.500 --> 10:15.420] Now, concerning the House Bill 1938, [10:15.420 --> 10:17.420] which would banish the naked body scanners, [10:17.420 --> 10:21.460] there are 42 co-authors that have signed on [10:21.460 --> 10:25.060] with the one primary author and the five joint authors. [10:25.060 --> 10:29.460] And so we've got 49, 50 House members [10:29.460 --> 10:34.340] that are basically co-authors of the 1938 bill, [10:34.340 --> 10:35.820] which would banish the naked body scanners. [10:35.820 --> 10:37.860] So again, we've got about a third of the House [10:37.860 --> 10:39.780] already in support of the bill. [10:39.780 --> 10:42.580] So we're hoping and praying that both of these bills [10:42.580 --> 10:43.900] will pass the House. [10:43.900 --> 10:46.580] If they do, at that point in time, [10:46.580 --> 10:51.580] it would go to, that bill would go to a Senate committee [10:52.140 --> 10:53.940] and there would be a Senate committee hearing [10:53.940 --> 10:56.580] on those two bills in the Senate. [10:56.580 --> 11:00.260] And if it passed out of the Senate committees then, [11:00.260 --> 11:02.380] or the Senate, the respective Senate committees [11:02.380 --> 11:04.580] for each bill, then it would go to the floor of the Senate. [11:04.580 --> 11:06.220] So it would have to pass through the whole process [11:06.220 --> 11:09.020] again in the Senate before it actually became law. [11:09.020 --> 11:11.780] Now, concerning the House Bill 439, [11:11.780 --> 11:13.780] this is a much more dangerous bill [11:13.780 --> 11:18.380] because there is a sister bill in the Senate. [11:18.380 --> 11:19.580] I forgot which number it is, [11:19.580 --> 11:21.740] but it has not come up for hearing yet. [11:21.740 --> 11:24.140] So they've got folks working in the House [11:24.140 --> 11:26.300] and the Senate on these checkpoints. [11:26.300 --> 11:29.260] So folks, we really, really need to get out there. [11:29.260 --> 11:31.660] In my opinion, going to these committee hearings [11:31.660 --> 11:36.660] and speaking and putting forth your affidavit [11:36.700 --> 11:39.580] is much more important than voting in my book [11:39.580 --> 11:40.860] because, well, it's voting. [11:40.860 --> 11:42.780] I mean, that's just a joke. [11:42.780 --> 11:45.220] All right, it's a complete and total joke [11:45.220 --> 11:47.420] because it's all the whole scam [11:47.420 --> 11:48.780] with the voting machines and everything. [11:48.780 --> 11:49.860] There's no accountability. [11:49.860 --> 11:53.940] There's no way to have any kinds of recounts [11:53.940 --> 11:54.940] or anything like that. [11:54.940 --> 11:57.140] It's a complete and total joke. [11:57.140 --> 11:59.140] And with the committee hearings, [11:59.140 --> 12:02.820] at least what you submit is a piece of paper, okay? [12:02.820 --> 12:04.220] So I like that part. [12:04.220 --> 12:05.820] And you actually get to go [12:05.820 --> 12:07.260] and talk to these public servants. [12:07.260 --> 12:09.620] And I found them to be very receptive. [12:09.620 --> 12:11.620] So they really do pay attention [12:11.620 --> 12:13.900] when the citizens take the time to go [12:13.900 --> 12:15.580] and speak in these committee hearings. [12:15.580 --> 12:17.580] They don't limit your time. [12:17.580 --> 12:19.980] They don't limit the number of speakers. [12:19.980 --> 12:22.660] They figure at the legislature, [12:22.660 --> 12:25.820] if the citizens are going to take the time [12:25.820 --> 12:27.860] to get up there to the Capitol [12:27.860 --> 12:30.140] and perhaps wait around all day [12:30.140 --> 12:33.140] and be on call to immediately run down there [12:33.140 --> 12:35.300] to these committee hearings when they convene, [12:35.300 --> 12:37.860] they're gonna let the citizens have their say. [12:37.860 --> 12:42.820] And it is necessary for us to go down there [12:42.820 --> 12:45.180] and say our piece and put in these affidavits [12:45.180 --> 12:47.300] if we want these bills to get passed [12:47.300 --> 12:49.180] because what happens is [12:49.180 --> 12:50.900] if and when they pass out a committee, [12:50.900 --> 12:52.900] let's just assume they pass out a committee, [12:52.900 --> 12:54.140] when they pass out a committee [12:54.140 --> 12:57.180] and go onto the floor for debate, [12:57.180 --> 13:00.140] that's when our voices get heard again [13:00.140 --> 13:02.140] because the people who support the bill, [13:02.140 --> 13:05.380] the representatives who support and sponsor the bill, [13:05.380 --> 13:08.020] they say look at all these cards I have. [13:08.020 --> 13:10.660] 200 people came by the committee hearing that day [13:10.660 --> 13:12.460] and said they support this bill [13:12.460 --> 13:17.460] and 45 people waited around for 12 hours to testify. [13:17.820 --> 13:21.980] This shows the extreme amount of public support [13:21.980 --> 13:22.820] for these bills [13:22.820 --> 13:26.780] and so that is leverage for the supporters of the bills [13:26.780 --> 13:28.060] to get these things passed [13:28.060 --> 13:31.740] or in the case of the House Bill 439, [13:31.740 --> 13:33.220] if we've got two, 300 people [13:33.220 --> 13:35.220] that have gone down there and submitted cards [13:35.220 --> 13:38.460] and 50 or more people that have testified, [13:38.460 --> 13:41.020] then the people who are opposing the bill will say [13:41.020 --> 13:43.980] hey look, the public does not want these checkpoints, [13:43.980 --> 13:46.420] here's all the reasons of why they're a bad idea, [13:46.420 --> 13:47.260] here's all the reasons [13:47.260 --> 13:50.820] of why it's not gonna help the drunk driving problem [13:50.820 --> 13:52.460] and on and on and on and on [13:52.460 --> 13:53.940] and Randy brought up a good point [13:53.940 --> 13:58.540] about one of the reasons why the Dallas-Fort Worth area [13:58.540 --> 14:01.500] is such a big problem with the DUI [14:01.500 --> 14:05.540] is because everybody gets dealt out [14:05.540 --> 14:09.180] and I remember they were speaking to this issue [14:09.180 --> 14:11.300] in the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee [14:11.300 --> 14:12.860] when we were at the committee hearing [14:12.860 --> 14:17.380] about the interlock bill concerning mounting technology [14:17.380 --> 14:20.980] where you would breathe into this tube [14:20.980 --> 14:22.780] to see if you're inebriated [14:22.780 --> 14:24.660] or over the legal limit or whatever [14:24.660 --> 14:27.140] and cameras and everything, all this sort of thing [14:27.140 --> 14:31.020] and folks at that hearing were saying it's a problem [14:31.020 --> 14:32.540] that the drunk driving is a problem [14:32.540 --> 14:36.460] because there are so many repeat first time offenders. [14:36.460 --> 14:39.940] Now how can you be a repeat first time offender? [14:39.940 --> 14:41.060] It's because of the way [14:41.060 --> 14:43.820] that the plea bargain system works here in this state [14:43.820 --> 14:48.580] and so that is the reason they deal everybody out [14:48.580 --> 14:51.540] and everybody, all these people that are repeat offenders, [14:51.540 --> 14:54.420] they end up becoming repeat first time offenders [14:54.420 --> 14:57.220] and all they get is a slap on the wrist or whatever [14:57.220 --> 14:58.780] and so that's why there's such a problem [14:58.780 --> 15:00.260] in the Dallas-Fort Worth area [15:00.260 --> 15:04.380] and so setting up checkpoints is not gonna help folks. [15:04.380 --> 15:05.220] It's not gonna help. [15:05.220 --> 15:07.060] All it's gonna do is bring down the police state [15:07.060 --> 15:11.580] so anyway, that's my recap from the hearing from yesterday. [15:11.580 --> 15:12.580] We're about to go to break. [15:12.580 --> 15:14.340] Randy, do you have anything to add? [15:15.620 --> 15:20.020] Well, just that the checkpoint is, [15:20.020 --> 15:21.900] unfortunately I'm gonna be out of town [15:21.900 --> 15:25.620] but I would very much like to be at that one. [15:25.620 --> 15:30.620] If we get the restriction against the offensive cha-ching, [15:33.540 --> 15:35.260] we have made a major step [15:35.260 --> 15:37.900] and there are a number of other states I understand [15:37.900 --> 15:41.740] proposing the same types of legislation. [15:42.980 --> 15:44.420] From my perspective, [15:44.420 --> 15:49.180] I take this as a very good sign overall. [15:49.180 --> 15:53.900] It tells me that the legislators in the states [15:53.900 --> 15:56.660] are looking at all of this crapola [15:56.660 --> 16:00.540] and federal preemption coming down for defense [16:00.540 --> 16:03.420] and they're saying enough already. [16:04.580 --> 16:08.260] They're beginning to put the brakes on federal preemption [16:08.260 --> 16:13.140] and I think federal preemption is far more important. [16:13.140 --> 16:14.780] As important as the concerns [16:14.780 --> 16:17.780] over the offensive touching is, [16:17.780 --> 16:21.220] it's my opinion that all of this is being done [16:21.220 --> 16:24.700] in order to condition us. [16:24.700 --> 16:26.860] I told the committee when I was in New York City [16:26.860 --> 16:31.540] in the subways, they had national guardsmen [16:31.540 --> 16:36.540] in and amongst our citizens with automatic weapons. [16:37.180 --> 16:40.340] The only place I ever saw anything like that [16:40.340 --> 16:43.060] was in foreign countries in war zones. [16:44.660 --> 16:46.100] This is not a war zone. [16:46.100 --> 16:49.300] They're trying to get us accustomed [16:49.300 --> 16:54.300] to military presence with weapons amongst the population [16:54.420 --> 16:58.020] and our constitution forbids that kind of crapola. [17:00.500 --> 17:02.860] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source [17:02.860 --> 17:04.700] for rare coins, precious metals, [17:04.700 --> 17:07.460] and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. [17:07.460 --> 17:09.220] We also ship worldwide. [17:09.220 --> 17:11.100] We're a family-owned and operated business [17:11.100 --> 17:12.620] that offers competitive prices [17:12.620 --> 17:14.740] on your coin and metals purchases. [17:14.740 --> 17:17.500] Because of you, Austin, business has been so good [17:17.500 --> 17:20.460] that we've had to move to a new and bigger location. [17:20.460 --> 17:24.140] We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, [17:24.140 --> 17:27.820] 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location. [17:27.820 --> 17:29.700] We're on the west side of Burnett Road [17:29.700 --> 17:32.420] in Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor [17:32.420 --> 17:35.380] next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash. [17:35.380 --> 17:37.700] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to six, [17:37.700 --> 17:39.180] Saturdays 10 to five. [17:39.180 --> 17:41.740] You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours [17:41.740 --> 17:45.140] or call 512-646-6440. [17:45.140 --> 17:47.940] Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us [17:47.940 --> 17:50.620] on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio. [17:50.620 --> 17:53.420] That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location [17:53.420 --> 17:56.100] at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A. [17:56.100 --> 18:00.300] We'll call 512-646-6440. [18:00.300 --> 18:02.460] Are you being harassed by debt collectors [18:02.460 --> 18:05.460] with phone calls, letters, or even losses? [18:05.460 --> 18:07.020] Stop debt collectors now [18:07.020 --> 18:09.100] with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.100 --> 18:11.900] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court [18:11.900 --> 18:14.740] against debt collectors and now you can win too. [18:14.740 --> 18:17.500] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English [18:17.500 --> 18:20.900] on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [18:20.900 --> 18:24.620] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [18:24.620 --> 18:26.660] how to answer letters and phone calls, [18:26.660 --> 18:29.260] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, [18:29.260 --> 18:31.180] how to turn the financial tables on them [18:31.180 --> 18:33.940] and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.940 --> 18:36.860] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution [18:36.860 --> 18:38.740] for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.740 --> 18:41.140] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.140 --> 18:44.540] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [18:44.540 --> 18:46.780] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [18:46.780 --> 18:49.580] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [18:49.580 --> 18:51.940] That's ruleoflawradio.com [18:51.940 --> 18:56.940] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [18:57.420 --> 18:59.940] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:59.940 --> 19:16.940] Look what we got, who reacts the Christian? [19:16.940 --> 19:18.940] Who are they hiding? [19:18.940 --> 19:21.940] They don't have answers. [19:21.940 --> 19:23.940] Nobody, nobody. [19:23.940 --> 19:26.940] Who reacts the Christian? [19:26.940 --> 19:30.940] Look what we got, how they don't have answers. [19:30.940 --> 19:32.940] I'm soaking, slipping, sliding. [19:32.940 --> 19:34.940] I've got no issues. [19:34.940 --> 19:37.940] I see, Lord, how they want me to take it easy. [19:37.940 --> 19:39.940] They might talk way too politically [19:39.940 --> 19:42.940] and then get you mad and angry. [19:42.940 --> 19:45.940] But they might stand up and fight and fight [19:45.940 --> 19:47.940] for their freedom and be free. [19:47.940 --> 19:49.940] And they like them love slavery [19:49.940 --> 19:51.940] and get handouts from the government. [19:51.940 --> 19:56.940] Look what we got, who reacts the Christian? [19:56.940 --> 19:58.940] Who are they hiding? [19:58.940 --> 20:01.940] They don't have answers. [20:01.940 --> 20:03.940] Nobody, nobody. [20:03.940 --> 20:06.940] Who reacts the Christian? [20:06.940 --> 20:11.940] Look what we got, how they don't have answers. [20:11.940 --> 20:13.940] I'm soaking, slipping, sliding. [20:13.940 --> 20:22.940] I see, Lord, how they want me to take it easy. [20:22.940 --> 20:24.940] They might talk way too politically [20:24.940 --> 20:26.940] and then get you mad and angry. [20:26.940 --> 20:30.940] I see, Lord, how they want me to take it easy. [20:30.940 --> 20:32.940] They might talk way too politically [20:32.940 --> 20:36.940] and then get you mad and fight for their freedom and be free. [20:36.940 --> 20:39.940] Look what we got, who reacts the Christian? [20:39.940 --> 20:42.940] Look what we got, how they want me to take it easy. [20:42.940 --> 20:46.940] The federal funds have been just steamrolling over the states. [20:46.940 --> 20:48.940] And because the states, [20:48.940 --> 20:50.940] the feds were providing the states [20:50.940 --> 20:53.940] with so much federal funding, [20:53.940 --> 20:56.940] the states tolerated it. [20:56.940 --> 20:59.940] Now the federal funding is drying up [20:59.940 --> 21:05.940] because the recession is decreasing the tax rolls, [21:05.940 --> 21:08.940] everybody is running out of money, [21:08.940 --> 21:12.900] And all of the politicians are looking for someone to blame. [21:13.980 --> 21:17.180] And fortunately, a lot of them are blaming the feds. [21:17.900 --> 21:22.840] The feds are not able to provide as much money to the states as they were able to. [21:23.720 --> 21:29.120] The local politicians who were being paid off aren't getting paid off as much. [21:29.920 --> 21:32.900] And now they're looking to punish the fed. [21:33.260 --> 21:36.060] From my perspective, that is the best thing that could happen. [21:36.060 --> 21:43.740] So now we have states reacting to federal preemption. [21:44.720 --> 21:48.360] This goes to a natural adjustment. [21:49.620 --> 21:54.740] Anytime the pendulum swings off center too far to any one side, [21:54.740 --> 21:58.140] the natural pressures pull it back, and that seems to be what's happening. [21:58.140 --> 22:00.460] So I am real pleased. [22:00.460 --> 22:03.420] I'm confident that these bills will pass. [22:03.420 --> 22:06.180] And if they pass in several other states, [22:06.540 --> 22:10.460] it will virtually eliminate this garbage all over the country. [22:12.140 --> 22:15.820] And then I will be able to fly without these guys with rubber gloves. [22:16.700 --> 22:20.460] Anytime I see one of these guys putting on rubber gloves, it always makes me nervous. [22:21.580 --> 22:23.140] Okay, enough of that. [22:24.460 --> 22:26.140] There's something I wanted to talk about. [22:26.140 --> 22:32.780] Sunday, on 60 Minutes, there was a show that we had been waiting for for quite a while. [22:33.900 --> 22:40.980] When I started the foreclosure issue, I actually started researching about a year [22:40.980 --> 22:48.500] and a half, almost two years ago, and I started helping people in November of last year, [22:48.500 --> 22:53.020] or actually a year before last, and I wasn't ready yet. [22:53.020 --> 22:58.540] I was still doing research, but so many people were in so much trouble, I couldn't wait anymore, [22:58.540 --> 23:01.020] and I started, we started working on them. [23:02.380 --> 23:07.500] And we told them, you know, from looking at the situation, we told people that [23:09.100 --> 23:14.220] looking at the coming election in November, this was early in last year, [23:15.900 --> 23:21.500] the legislature was going into the election with an 11% approval rating, [23:21.500 --> 23:28.860] the lowest ever, and we looked at the situation, and it was clear that politicians needed a [23:28.860 --> 23:33.420] scapegoat, and there was only one available, and it was the lender. [23:34.940 --> 23:43.740] And we fully expected the legislators to throw the lender to the wolves, and we intended to be [23:43.740 --> 23:51.660] the wolves. Well, they did that, but what we didn't expect is for the legislators to throw [23:51.660 --> 23:58.700] them under the bus first and run over them a couple of times. The lenders have been treated [23:59.980 --> 24:09.740] far more brutally than we ever expected. Every attorney general in every state has a major [24:09.740 --> 24:19.900] investigation going on against the banks. And then we have this 60-minute program on last Sunday, [24:21.660 --> 24:29.980] and what they were talking about is the documentation. All along, we've been saying, [24:29.980 --> 24:40.540] show me the note. Prove that you are the correct person. You are the one that actually holds the [24:40.540 --> 24:49.340] note to this property. And for a while there, the lenders argued with the courts that it wasn't [24:49.340 --> 24:54.700] necessary, that you didn't have to provide the original documentation. You could produce just [24:54.700 --> 25:01.260] copies, and they did a lot of song and dance, and then Bank of America stopped all foreclosures [25:02.540 --> 25:07.980] to get their paperwork right. And they stopped for a while, and then they started again. [25:07.980 --> 25:13.180] Well, they got the paperwork right, but it turns out the way they got the paperwork right [25:13.660 --> 25:20.300] is they forged it, because this is what was happening for the last 15 years or so. [25:20.300 --> 25:27.820] All of these banks were using MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Service. [25:28.860 --> 25:37.580] MERS went to the court in Landmark v. Kessler, a Kansas, State of Kansas case. It went to the [25:37.580 --> 25:45.580] Kansas Supreme Court, and they went to the court and said that this requirement [25:45.580 --> 25:54.540] to register all sales of security instruments based on consumer residential mortgages, [25:55.820 --> 26:02.060] this requirement to register those with the clerk of the court is archaic, costly, and cumbersome. [26:03.100 --> 26:10.060] So we put together this whiz-bang business. And with this whiz-bang business, the banks can come [26:10.060 --> 26:18.860] to us and register the security instrument with us, and we stand as the nominee for the holder of [26:18.860 --> 26:26.140] note. And then the banks can go behind us and sell it back and forth all they want, without registering [26:26.140 --> 26:35.180] with the clerk of the court. And the Supreme Court of Kansas said that MERS was right. [26:35.180 --> 26:41.980] The requirement to register each sale of the security instrument was archaic, costly, and [26:41.980 --> 26:49.820] cumbersome. However, you have to take that up with the legislature, because it is a statutory [26:49.820 --> 27:00.620] requirement. And your whiz-bang business program, or business venture, is not going to be able to [27:00.620 --> 27:10.620] override legislative requirements. But it was worse than just that. What MERS actually did [27:11.340 --> 27:20.700] was a bank would register the security instrument with MERS. MERS would scan the information into [27:20.700 --> 27:27.180] their electronic system, and then destroy the original security instrument with MERS. [27:27.180 --> 27:37.260] The problem, 5-301, Uniform Commercial Code, very clearly states that when the creditor demands [27:37.260 --> 27:46.220] payment of the debtor, and the debtor subsequently demands that the creditor prove upholdership by [27:46.220 --> 27:53.420] producing the original security instrument, the creditor would not be able to pay the debtor. [27:53.420 --> 28:02.060] The creditor must make the original security instrument available for inspection by the [28:02.060 --> 28:13.180] creditor, or else the debtor is stopped from further collection. Didn't they read that? [28:13.180 --> 28:22.300] That was very clear, very hard to misunderstand. You have to have that documentation. But they [28:22.300 --> 28:31.500] didn't. They were in a feeding frenzy of creating these notes and selling them back and forth. [28:31.500 --> 28:43.420] Now, it's a whole lot worse than that. The banks were creating notes that they intended that you [28:43.420 --> 28:55.180] default on. Now, I know it sounds unintuitive to think that a bank would create a note and give you [28:55.180 --> 29:02.460] all of this money, and not want you to pay it back. But that is exactly what they did. [29:03.820 --> 29:10.860] They needed for you to foreclose. They needed for you to default on the mortgage so that they [29:10.860 --> 29:19.500] could foreclose on the mortgage, because they had a pretty good bookie, HCI, Shearson, Lehman, [29:19.500 --> 29:25.180] Lehman Brothers. That was their bookie. And they had placed a whole lot of bets that you would [29:25.180 --> 29:29.580] default on this mortgage. Well, that was a good bet, because when they created the mortgage, [29:29.580 --> 29:37.020] they designed it so that you wouldn't default. And then they did some incredible investments. [29:37.820 --> 29:44.700] When we come back on the other side, I'll explain what they did and how they put this scheme [29:44.700 --> 29:50.700] together, and now how it's all fallen apart around their ears. This is Randy Kelton, [29:50.700 --> 30:18.700] David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back. [30:20.700 --> 30:43.900] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with more in just a moment. [31:50.700 --> 31:53.900] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [32:50.700 --> 33:05.180] Okay, we're back. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio. [33:06.700 --> 33:13.500] And I was crafting an interesting story. At least I hope it's interesting. Why would a lender [33:13.500 --> 33:20.300] create a loan and give you a whole bunch of money and not want you to pay it back? [33:21.660 --> 33:30.220] Well, this is taking me a long time to figure out all the pieces. I've understood a lot of [33:30.220 --> 33:36.140] what went on, but there were these empty places, things I didn't understand why they did what they [33:36.140 --> 33:45.100] did, and I think I have it all put together now. The lender secures your signature on a security [33:45.100 --> 33:55.100] instrument, on a promissory note, and then he takes that promissory note and he sells it to an investor. [33:55.100 --> 34:07.740] Well, when he creates the promissory note, he has the borrower get mortgage insurance, [34:07.740 --> 34:16.540] and this mortgage insurance is designed to protect him against a default. With this mortgage [34:16.540 --> 34:21.740] insurance, if you fail to complete the contract in default, the mortgage insurance will pay him [34:21.740 --> 34:30.460] 85% of the original principal. So he's pretty well protected. He's not 100% protected, [34:30.460 --> 34:40.700] but he's 85% protected. So he creates the note and he immediately sells it. Now, he gives you, [34:40.700 --> 34:49.740] just use as an example, 100,000 to purchase his property with. Now, he gives you the mortgage [34:49.740 --> 34:56.300] insurance. Now, he gives you a promissory note with instant value, a check, you can go cash it, [34:58.060 --> 35:02.540] and you give him a promissory note with no instant value, with no present value, but [35:03.740 --> 35:08.140] increased future value, generally two and a half times, two to two and a half times, [35:08.140 --> 35:19.100] depending on the interest rate. The investor purchases the security instrument, it purchases [35:19.100 --> 35:29.100] the note from the lender at generally like 125,000, because over 30 years, he's going to collect [35:29.100 --> 35:35.100] a couple hundred. So he does okay. The lender does okay, gets his money back and makes a profit. [35:36.700 --> 35:42.300] That's all well and good. And if that's as far as it went, it would have been fine. [35:42.300 --> 35:52.780] But what we're finding is, is that the lender wasn't satisfied with selling the note to one [35:52.780 --> 36:05.180] investor, but sold the same note to a number of investors. So he received consideration a number [36:05.180 --> 36:15.100] of times for the same note. Now, every month you pay a premium, and the investors expect to receive [36:15.100 --> 36:22.780] a portion of that premium. So the question arose, if they sell the note 30 times, which Bank of [36:22.780 --> 36:32.220] America has been accused of doing, how do they keep up with these payments? Well, initially they [36:32.220 --> 36:37.820] receive a very large amount of money. They'll receive all the money they put out initially, [36:38.540 --> 36:47.420] plus they'll receive on the order of 25% extra. So they designed this note to default. [36:48.620 --> 36:53.580] So what they have to do, since they look at the notes, they're sure are going to default, [36:54.540 --> 37:00.540] and they sell them a number of times to a number of different investors. And then they go by [37:00.540 --> 37:07.900] derivative contracts on them. Derivative contracts are unregulated insurance contracts. [37:09.820 --> 37:14.460] They go to these insurance company and they bet with the insurance company that this note's going [37:14.460 --> 37:27.340] to default. And if they win the bet, they'll receive 85% of the principal. So for each time [37:27.340 --> 37:35.260] they sell the note, they'll buy a derivative contract to cover that sale. And then in the [37:35.260 --> 37:43.100] amount of time that you're paying your payment, every month when you pay your payment, the bank [37:43.100 --> 37:48.700] will take, or the lender will take out of all of the monies it collected from all of these different [37:48.700 --> 37:55.900] investors, it'll take a portion of that and pay a payment to each one of them. Keep them happy. [37:55.900 --> 38:07.340] Keep them happy. And then they start looking for you to slow pay. They look for an indication [38:07.340 --> 38:13.740] that you're getting in financial trouble. And one of the tricks they use to secure their outcome [38:14.380 --> 38:22.300] is they will charge you less than you actually owe. So over time, you build up a deficiency [38:22.300 --> 38:29.980] that you don't know about. Or they'll fail to pay your property taxes on time. [38:32.860 --> 38:40.300] Wait till they get a penalty from the taxing agency to then take your payment, apply it to [38:40.300 --> 38:48.700] the tax instead of your note. Then they'll use that to put the slow pay mark on your credit [38:48.700 --> 38:55.420] rating to destroy your credit rating so you can't refinance. And then they'll come to you and say, [38:55.420 --> 39:00.620] well, you've been underpaying these last two or three, four or five years. You go, it's 30 grand. [39:00.620 --> 39:05.660] Give us 30 grand and we're going to foreclose. I get a number of people coming to me saying, [39:05.660 --> 39:11.020] I've made my payments every month on time and they foreclosed anyway. And this is how they do it. [39:11.900 --> 39:17.100] They absolutely need you to foreclose. They need to foreclose because that's the best they made. [39:17.100 --> 39:25.340] They got this thing sold 30 times. They have to default the note. When the note forecloses, [39:25.340 --> 39:32.060] they go to all of these lenders and say, sorry guys, the note went into default, we foreclosed. [39:33.020 --> 39:37.260] Then they go to the insurance carriers where they wrote all these derivatives [39:37.260 --> 39:44.380] and they collect 85% of the note on each one of them. And then they sell the house at auction [39:44.380 --> 39:52.540] and they try to get 85% of the original value at auction. And then they go to each one of these [39:52.540 --> 39:58.860] investors and say, ah, this is all we got. And they give them that amount of money. It makes them [39:58.860 --> 40:12.220] satisfied. They keep the original sale price. They use the derivatives to fund the defaults. [40:12.220 --> 40:18.780] So all of these individuals appear to have received consideration based on the default, [40:18.780 --> 40:23.820] but they lost a lot of money, but then the thing foreclosed and they expect to lose money. [40:25.100 --> 40:36.380] The lender makes a fortune. And then when the AIG, I keep doing it backwards. Somebody sent me an [40:36.380 --> 40:42.380] email and told me I've got it backwards again. Shearson Lehman, Lehman Brothers, when they started [40:42.380 --> 40:49.980] to have to pay all of these, then they came to the, our illustrious legislators who they had bought [40:49.980 --> 40:59.740] and paid for and got them to bail them out to the tune of 7 trillion. Now it takes some for you to [40:59.740 --> 41:11.020] appreciate how much that is. The Federal Reserve was put into existence in 1916. For the next 92 [41:11.020 --> 41:22.300] years, they put into the economy in the form of Federal Reserve notes, $1 trillion. And if you [41:22.300 --> 41:31.420] look at a graph of the rise of the number of dollars in circulation and superimpose over that, [41:32.460 --> 41:42.220] the price of gold and the price of silver, both of them match precisely. They both kind of wiggle [41:42.220 --> 41:54.220] up and down, but over the 92 years, they follow almost exactly on a slight, about a 2% incline. [41:54.780 --> 42:03.980] As the money increases, price of gold and silver increases. In 2008, they went from 1 trillion to [42:03.980 --> 42:13.180] 8. The graph went straight up out of sight. So if there's any question, where to invest your money? [42:13.180 --> 42:21.820] Hard commodities, gold, silver, lead, copper, platinum, palladium, anything hard. Well, [42:21.820 --> 42:28.540] the lenders got all of the 7 trillion that they wanted and then they looked at what was going on [42:28.540 --> 42:37.740] and they said, if we use this money, we'll force the dollar into hyperinflation. And all of these [42:37.740 --> 42:44.060] people that have all of these mortgages, they'll be able to pay them off with a loaf of bread [42:45.820 --> 42:50.220] because the mortgage does not increase because the value of the dollar decreases. [42:51.180 --> 42:57.180] And then we won't be able to foreclose and we will really be screwed because the Ponzi scheme [42:57.180 --> 43:06.860] will start coming apart. Well, the Ponzi scheme came apart anyway. And now we reached a point to [43:06.860 --> 43:13.740] where the people getting foreclosed on is beginning to figure out what the scheme was. [43:15.340 --> 43:23.260] And with this latest 60-minute program, they waved it in front of the American public like [43:23.260 --> 43:30.140] a red flag. I watched that program and I was thinking, these guys are not kicking open the [43:30.140 --> 43:39.660] floodgates. They're knocking the floodgates down. Anybody who has a suit, a foreclosure suit [43:40.300 --> 43:46.940] in process now has a very good chance of winning the whole enchilada. And we'll talk a little bit [43:46.940 --> 43:50.620] more about that on the other side and then we'll take calls. I know you guys are waiting, [43:50.620 --> 43:54.780] but we'll take your calls on the other side. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, [43:54.780 --> 44:21.420] Root of Law Radio, we'll be right back. [44:25.340 --> 44:30.540] like that exists. Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, [44:30.540 --> 44:36.060] just south of UT. By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, [44:36.060 --> 44:41.580] they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility, [44:41.580 --> 44:48.140] just behind the bookstore. It does exist, but when are they open? Monday through Saturday, [44:48.140 --> 44:55.420] 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and one to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503 [44:55.420 --> 45:03.260] or check out their events page at brave new bookstore.com. At hempusa.org, we offer chemical [45:03.260 --> 45:08.300] free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding [45:08.300 --> 45:13.820] the immune system. We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, [45:13.820 --> 45:19.740] micro plant powder. Our micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics to help rebuild [45:19.740 --> 45:25.580] the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora. Micro plant powder is excellent for daily [45:25.580 --> 45:30.300] intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter. We urge our listeners to please visit [45:30.300 --> 45:35.900] us at hempusa.org. And remember, all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat. [45:35.900 --> 45:41.500] We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere. And [45:41.500 --> 45:48.060] we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S. Please visit us at hempusa.org [45:48.060 --> 45:57.340] or call 908-69-12608. That's 908-69-12608. See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you [45:57.340 --> 46:12.620] at hempusa.org. [46:28.300 --> 46:35.180] Okay, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig with La Radio. And we were talking about the scam [46:35.180 --> 46:41.580] they pulled on us. Now, that was attenuated. That wasn't the whole story. There's a lot more to it. [46:42.780 --> 46:50.460] But that's basically how the pieces fit together. And what happened last Sunday [46:50.460 --> 46:58.940] was a presentation that I've had a number of people contact me and say they don't understand [46:58.940 --> 47:11.100] how that was allowed to air because it was so incredibly damning. This lawyer in Florida was, [47:11.100 --> 47:17.260] the bank was trying to foreclose on her. And apparently she fought them pretty well. What, [47:17.260 --> 47:23.420] they banked? And originally the bank told the court that they had lost the paperwork. [47:24.300 --> 47:31.100] And then a year later, they found it. And this attorney was rather dubious about that. [47:31.660 --> 47:42.380] And it just so happened that she was a specialist in fraudulent documents. She trained FBI agents [47:42.380 --> 47:49.900] on how to recognize fraudulent documents. So she looked at the documents and apparently it didn't [47:49.900 --> 47:59.260] take a trained professional because the person who signed the document, once she began doing [47:59.260 --> 48:07.900] research on other cases, she found that this person signed thousands of documents. And she had a [48:07.900 --> 48:15.740] number of different signature styles. And that she was the president of 20 some odd banks. [48:17.260 --> 48:24.060] She was a very busy person. So 60 minutes went looking for this person, Linda Green, [48:25.180 --> 48:32.620] and they found her in Georgia. And she had worked for a company called DOCX. [48:32.620 --> 48:41.820] And what she did at that company, her credentials, her background that gave her standing to be the [48:41.820 --> 48:48.620] vice president of 20 some odd banks was that she had worked as an accounting clerk for an auto parts [48:48.620 --> 48:57.260] company. And then they hired her to be the vice president of all of these banks and sign all of [48:57.260 --> 49:07.100] these affidavits of assignment of the security instrument to all of these entities doing [49:07.100 --> 49:13.660] foreclosures. But there was a problem with that. She was so busy that she needed help. [49:14.620 --> 49:21.980] So they hired a whole bunch of other people to sign her name as the vice president's and [49:21.980 --> 49:27.980] presidents of all these different banks. As a matter of fact, they were required to sign at [49:27.980 --> 49:35.100] least 370 per hour. They hired high school kids to sign these documents. They hired people to [49:35.100 --> 49:41.580] notarize these documents. To notarize the fact that the person doing the signing was in fact Linda [49:41.580 --> 49:49.260] Green and was the vice president of this bank. They did not sign her name. They hired people [49:49.260 --> 49:56.860] to sign her name. They did thousands upon thousands. This is because MERS had destroyed [49:56.860 --> 50:06.460] all these documents. And the banks needed new documents. Well, you would think that with the [50:06.460 --> 50:14.620] amounts of money we're talking about with home loans and such, that they would take some care [50:14.620 --> 50:21.980] when they're creating far dealer documents, at least to do it in a way so they sort of looked [50:21.980 --> 50:33.260] like they were valid. The reason they used Linda Green's name is that it was easy to spell and [50:33.260 --> 50:45.420] easy to write. That way the people signing could sign faster. That is just wrong. You know, I was [50:45.420 --> 50:55.900] going to say, how could somebody even write that fast to sign 370 times in an hour? That's six. [50:55.900 --> 51:01.740] And then they just make up a name because it's easy to write and sign faster and faster and [51:01.740 --> 51:09.340] faster and faster to steal more and more and more people's homes. Man, can you imagine the [51:09.340 --> 51:14.220] thousands if not millions of people last Sunday night that watched that clip that were just [51:14.220 --> 51:20.300] infuriated? Absolutely. You know, there were a million people foreclosed on last year. [51:20.300 --> 51:26.140] And how many of them were by the so-called Linda Green? We don't know yet. [51:26.140 --> 51:33.100] Their investigation is still going on. In the clip, they talked to the chairman of the Federal [51:33.100 --> 51:38.060] Deposit Insurance Corporation. And she was saying, oh, this is really naughty, naughty. [51:38.060 --> 51:47.500] We're going to find these guys. And I'm thinking, find these guys? Any one of those is sufficient [51:47.500 --> 51:53.740] to put the individual who signed that note into prison for a very long time. What about the high [51:53.740 --> 52:01.020] school kids that didn't know any better? I mean, are they, are they culpable criminally also here? [52:01.020 --> 52:07.660] Absolutely. In other words, the lesson here is don't ever sign anyone else's name, folks, [52:07.660 --> 52:14.780] without their personal permission. Well, the first guy they interviewed, he was a guy. And they said, [52:14.780 --> 52:20.540] are you Linda Green? He said, well, yeah, I'm Linda Green. Don't I look like Linda Green? [52:20.540 --> 52:30.460] Don't I look like Linda Green? They asked him, didn't you think something was wrong with this? [52:30.460 --> 52:35.420] He said, yeah, it didn't seem right. But they assured us everything was above board. [52:36.220 --> 52:41.340] The woman who was notarizing all of these documents, they assured her everything was above [52:41.340 --> 52:45.820] board. Wait a minute. Now, the notary should have known better for sure, even if the high [52:45.820 --> 52:53.100] school kids didn't. Are you kidding me? Even a high school kid knows better than to sign [52:53.100 --> 53:02.140] someone else's name to a document. Absolutely, they are culpable. Absolutely, they knew what [53:02.140 --> 53:11.500] they were doing was absolutely outrageous. And they're actually going on national television, [53:11.500 --> 53:18.140] admitting that they did this. Are they out of their minds? Do they really think they're so above [53:18.140 --> 53:26.220] prosecution? So what? They're just going to hang up the high school kids, but the bad boys who [53:26.220 --> 53:31.100] are really at fault here, they're just going to get away scot-free with a slap on the wrist? [53:31.100 --> 53:38.220] Is that what's going to happen? We're working out a program to go after the person who is [53:38.220 --> 53:45.020] doing the foreclosure. That's the one we want. We don't care about everybody else. We can hold [53:45.020 --> 53:53.340] him responsible for what everybody else did. And he's the one perpetrating the ultimate harm of the [53:53.340 --> 54:00.220] entire conspiracy. So he's the one we can hold responsible. What the banks have been doing is [54:00.220 --> 54:05.580] no matter who you sue, they say, oh, well, he's not the right one. You should have sued this one [54:05.580 --> 54:09.980] over here. And then that one says, oh, I'm not the right one. You should sue this one over here. [54:09.980 --> 54:14.780] Well, we don't care who's the right one, who's the wrong one. Whoever it is who's trying to do [54:14.780 --> 54:23.020] the foreclosure, he's the one trying to exact the ultimate harm of the entire conspiracy. [54:23.740 --> 54:31.660] And thereby he can be held responsible for the entire harm. A harm that is indivisible [54:31.660 --> 54:39.660] cannot be divided. So anyone responsible for any apportion of the harm can be held responsible [54:39.660 --> 54:46.300] for the entire harm. And they can't claim statute of limitations because he demanded payment last [54:46.300 --> 54:53.980] month. That was a new tort. He can't go to vicarious liability because we're not charging [54:53.980 --> 55:00.300] him with what other people did. We're charging him with what he did. And this gives us a lot [55:00.300 --> 55:13.180] stronger way to go at them. So, but with this airing, if anybody out there is way on the far [55:13.180 --> 55:23.820] right and the American flag, you know, trust your government, that's gone. Nobody can watch this [55:23.820 --> 55:31.260] program and trust the government. People who purchased homes dealt with licensed professionals [55:31.260 --> 55:37.340] and exercised diligence in using licensed professionals because they could trust those [55:37.340 --> 55:43.020] professionals. And they could trust them because they were under the direction and control of a [55:43.980 --> 55:51.740] governing government agency. The government agency is the one that failed us all. Government [55:51.740 --> 56:02.300] regulation was ineffectual at best, nonexistent at worst. And they let us all down. And now it's [56:02.300 --> 56:09.740] becoming clear to everybody. You can't keep up this cognitive dissonance. You can't keep saying [56:09.740 --> 56:13.740] there's, look in your garden and say, there's no weeds, there's no weeds, there's no weeds. [56:14.940 --> 56:20.220] There's weeds, guys, and you can't ignore them. So this is going to open the floodgates. [56:20.220 --> 56:25.180] I'm looking for things to get incredibly interesting here in the next few months. [56:25.740 --> 56:33.820] And we have about 400 federal lawsuits in place now. Every one of them could win the whole [56:33.820 --> 56:41.740] enchilada. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation chairman, Sheila Baird, was saying that [56:41.740 --> 56:50.300] they're pressing the banks to set aside a fund to remunerate these people who have been [56:50.300 --> 56:55.660] improperly foreclosed on. What they're going to do is offer Trump change in exchange for you not [56:55.660 --> 57:02.780] suing them. Well, those that are already in suit, or those that come in to suit before all of this [57:02.780 --> 57:09.660] happens, they will have a lot more leverage and they'll get a whole lot bigger piece of this pie. [57:09.660 --> 57:15.900] I would like to see every single person who was wrongfully foreclosed on file suit. [57:16.940 --> 57:24.060] And if we bankrupt all of the major banks in the country, I think that could be the best [57:24.060 --> 57:33.580] thing to happen to the country and the world economy in general. Because when those banks [57:33.580 --> 57:40.140] go out of business, smaller banks will come up to take their place and they will be necessarily [57:40.700 --> 57:47.340] less corrupt. Now, it will be up to us to make sure they don't become as corrupt as the big banks [57:47.340 --> 57:55.980] did. My generation failed in that responsibility miserably. I'm hoping my children and my [57:55.980 --> 58:01.100] grandchildren will learn from our lessons and say, don't be like those clowns. [58:01.100 --> 58:07.980] Don't be like those clowns. Let's stay after our government and make sure they're doing right. [58:09.340 --> 58:13.740] When we come back from the other side, we'll start taking calls. We've got Frank from New York, [58:13.740 --> 58:19.020] Evangeline from Pennsylvania, Paul of Kentucky, and John in Illinois. I'm sorry to hold you up [58:19.020 --> 58:26.300] all this time, but I have this little story I want to tell. And when we come back from the other side, [58:26.300 --> 58:32.860] we'll take stories, questions on that issue or any other issue you have that you want our [58:32.860 --> 58:40.540] opinions on. And we get to play Chump the Stumps. This is Randy Caltzman, [58:40.540 --> 58:48.220] Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984. [58:48.220 --> 58:56.060] Call us in and give us your hardest questions. We'll be right back. [58:59.900 --> 59:05.500] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [59:05.500 --> 59:11.500] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:11.500 --> 59:18.380] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. [59:19.020 --> 59:24.940] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than [59:24.940 --> 59:32.060] 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:32.060 --> 59:37.100] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:37.100 --> 59:42.380] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:43.020 --> 59:53.340] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:53.340 --> 59:59.580] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [59:59.580 --> 01:00:04.460] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net. [01:00:04.460 --> 01:00:10.140] Japan was rattled Thursday by a 7.1 earthquake nearly a month after the devastating earthquake [01:00:10.140 --> 01:00:15.420] and tsunami flattened the northeast coast and sparked a nuclear catastrophe. Hundreds of [01:00:15.420 --> 01:00:21.740] aftershocks have shaken the northeast region, but few have been stronger than 7.0. Thursday's quake [01:00:21.740 --> 01:00:28.220] struck off the coast 90 miles from Fukushima. A U.S. government regulator says the blowout [01:00:28.220 --> 01:00:34.220] preventer that failed on the oil well that led to the BP oil disaster was four years overdue for [01:00:34.220 --> 01:00:40.300] maintenance under Driller Transocean's internal guidelines. Jason Matthews of the U.S. Bureau of [01:00:40.300 --> 01:00:44.940] Ocean Energy Management said Thursday the Deepwater Horizons blowout preventer hadn't [01:00:44.940 --> 01:00:51.980] been disassembled and refurbished since 2001. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday [01:00:51.980 --> 01:00:56.300] Democrats and Republicans in Congress have essentially agreed on spending levels for the [01:00:56.300 --> 01:01:01.100] rest of the year, but the budget that's threatening to shut down the federal government Friday is [01:01:01.100 --> 01:01:06.540] being held up over abortion and clean air regulation issues. Reid said we should not [01:01:06.540 --> 01:01:13.340] be distracted by ideology. This is a bill that funds the government. Barack Obama is negotiating [01:01:13.340 --> 01:01:18.380] a trade agreement with Colombia, which Colombia will make changes to his labor laws and improve [01:01:18.380 --> 01:01:23.500] its record of combating violence against union organizers. Business groups, including the U.S. [01:01:23.500 --> 01:01:29.580] Chamber of Commerce, have praised the agreement. However, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and [01:01:29.580 --> 01:01:34.460] other labor leaders opposed the deal. Trumka says the proposed trade agreement doesn't stipulate [01:01:34.460 --> 01:01:40.380] benchmarks for progress in the areas of violence and impunity or address many ways Colombian labor [01:01:40.380 --> 01:01:45.740] laws fall short of international standards. 3,800 union leaders and activists have been [01:01:45.740 --> 01:01:51.820] assassinated in Colombia since the mid-1980s, and numerous U.S. corporations, including Coca-Cola, [01:01:51.820 --> 01:01:56.940] have forged links with right-wing paramilitary outfits who have been responsible for most of [01:01:56.940 --> 01:02:02.940] the violence. Trumka says 51 union organizers were killed in Colombia last year, adding he [01:02:02.940 --> 01:02:11.260] doubts the agreement would still be alive if 51 CEOs had been killed. Workers at Japan's Fukushima [01:02:11.260 --> 01:02:17.500] nuclear plant Thursday started pumping nitrogen into a crippled reactor to displace oxygen in a [01:02:17.500 --> 01:02:22.060] bid to prevent another explosion. The fresh challenge underscored the fragility of the [01:02:22.060 --> 01:02:28.140] situation after rare progress was seen Wednesday when workers plugged a hole spewing highly [01:02:28.140 --> 01:02:33.900] radioactive water into the ocean. Tokyo electric power officials say hydrogen building up in the [01:02:33.900 --> 01:02:39.420] housing around reactor number one could mix with incoming oxygen, creating an explosion. [01:02:39.420 --> 01:02:44.540] Experts say the risk of a detonation could increase as the fuel rods cool and as steam [01:02:44.540 --> 01:02:49.900] inside the containment vessel condenses into water, reducing pressure inside the unit and [01:02:49.900 --> 01:02:55.580] drawing air in through the cracks. Workers began pumping in nitrogen and inert gas [01:02:55.580 --> 01:02:59.100] abundant in the atmosphere, a process that will take about six days. [01:02:59.100 --> 01:03:19.100] You are listening to the rule of law radio network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech talk radio at its best. [01:03:29.180 --> 01:03:33.980] They want to charge down Babylon and burn down the whole nation, [01:03:33.980 --> 01:03:39.100] but they don't operate the land right. I'm a self-republican demonstrator. [01:03:39.100 --> 01:03:43.100] Tell them I'm a libertarian. They're a libertarian, but they don't do it. [01:03:43.100 --> 01:03:59.100] I'm a libertarian. [01:04:13.100 --> 01:04:33.100] I'm a libertarian. [01:04:43.100 --> 01:05:01.100] Okay, folks, we are back. [01:05:01.100 --> 01:05:07.100] We're taking your phone calls. Thank all you callers for holding on so patiently. [01:05:07.100 --> 01:05:11.100] We are going first to Frank in New York. Frank, thank you for holding. [01:05:11.100 --> 01:05:15.100] What is your comment or question for us tonight? [01:05:15.100 --> 01:05:19.100] Hi. First, I want to say thanks, Brandy, for all your work. [01:05:19.100 --> 01:05:27.100] You did a bang-up job on that mortgage thing. I really like listening to it. [01:05:27.100 --> 01:05:32.100] I think it's teaching the kids that the bigger the crime they pull, the more profitable it's going to be, [01:05:32.100 --> 01:05:38.100] because it's just going to slap on the wrist or only a fraction of what they deserve in penalties. [01:05:38.100 --> 01:05:45.100] I'm trying to set an example here in New York for the kids [01:05:45.100 --> 01:05:51.100] that I'm not playing the games of these criminals in the justice system. [01:05:51.100 --> 01:05:54.100] If they want to misbehave, I'm going to go after them. [01:05:54.100 --> 01:05:57.100] Even if I have to go to jail or get shot or whatever, I don't care what they do to me. [01:05:57.100 --> 01:06:02.100] I'm going to play fair, and I'm not going to feed their little game. [01:06:02.100 --> 01:06:14.100] My girlfriend's son pressed charges on me for, was it, endangering or whatever endangerment. [01:06:14.100 --> 01:06:16.100] Reckless endangerment? [01:06:16.100 --> 01:06:22.100] Yeah, reckless endangerment, and what was the other one? Harassment. [01:06:22.100 --> 01:06:28.100] We filed the affidavits today. We couldn't get the district attorney to take them. [01:06:28.100 --> 01:06:32.100] I told her to take a tape recorder in with her. She didn't have one. [01:06:32.100 --> 01:06:36.100] He sent her away. He sent her to the sheriff. [01:06:36.100 --> 01:06:39.100] I told her to take his name, too. [01:06:39.100 --> 01:06:43.100] Then they sent her to the Rosendale Police Department, which we were, you know, [01:06:43.100 --> 01:06:47.100] those are the people, the money-grubbing fools over there. [01:06:47.100 --> 01:06:51.100] She gave them the affidavits. They took them, put them in my file, [01:06:51.100 --> 01:06:55.100] and no charges got pressed against her son. [01:06:55.100 --> 01:07:01.100] She said, okay, so they believe me and you, but they're not going to go after the real criminal. [01:07:01.100 --> 01:07:07.100] And they did look up that he was stopped that day, speeding or something. [01:07:07.100 --> 01:07:11.100] So, I mean, it's all adding up, but they still want me to go in front of the judge [01:07:11.100 --> 01:07:15.100] and get bail and go to jail and all this stuff. [01:07:15.100 --> 01:07:21.100] And I'm like, okay, so they're going to make money on my bond, on my fortunate forget. [01:07:21.100 --> 01:07:25.100] They're going to discharge it through the treasury, get through a little flow, [01:07:25.100 --> 01:07:27.100] then charge me, give me a fine, or make a deal with me. [01:07:27.100 --> 01:07:29.100] This time, I'm not playing the game. [01:07:29.100 --> 01:07:34.100] So I figure it's a mystery. [01:07:34.100 --> 01:07:37.100] Hello? [01:07:37.100 --> 01:07:40.100] Frank, you still there? [01:07:40.100 --> 01:07:41.100] Hello? [01:07:41.100 --> 01:07:43.100] Yeah, go ahead, Frank. [01:07:43.100 --> 01:07:48.100] Okay, the kid didn't respond to the persuasion because he has a little secret. [01:07:48.100 --> 01:07:50.100] He's trying to hide his traffic ticket. [01:07:50.100 --> 01:07:53.100] Wait, hold on, Frank, hold on, Frank. [01:07:53.100 --> 01:07:54.100] Yeah? [01:07:54.100 --> 01:07:58.100] We're talking about a whole bunch of stuff. [01:07:58.100 --> 01:07:59.100] I know. [01:07:59.100 --> 01:08:02.100] We don't have a clue as to what you're talking about. [01:08:02.100 --> 01:08:03.100] Yeah, we do. [01:08:03.100 --> 01:08:07.100] This is the guy who was in Florida, and the stepson reported that he had tried to run over him with a car [01:08:07.100 --> 01:08:10.100] while he and the mother were leaving to go to Florida. [01:08:10.100 --> 01:08:11.100] Wait a minute. [01:08:11.100 --> 01:08:14.100] You know what he's talking about, and maybe Debra knows what he's talking about, [01:08:14.100 --> 01:08:17.100] but I doubt our listeners have a clue. [01:08:17.100 --> 01:08:19.100] I certainly don't. [01:08:19.100 --> 01:08:25.100] You want to kind of give us a quick on where you're at and what's really going on. [01:08:25.100 --> 01:08:27.100] Okay. [01:08:27.100 --> 01:08:32.100] We pulled out to leave, and we were attacked in the car. [01:08:32.100 --> 01:08:34.100] We left anyway for vacation. [01:08:34.100 --> 01:08:38.100] We weren't going to let the little devil get away with our fun. [01:08:38.100 --> 01:08:40.100] We took care of him when we got back. [01:08:40.100 --> 01:08:47.100] Well, we had a lot of difficulties because he kept on taunting his mother and stuff like that from afar, [01:08:47.100 --> 01:08:49.100] throwing parties and stuff like that. [01:08:49.100 --> 01:08:51.100] It really almost ruined our vacation. [01:08:51.100 --> 01:08:54.100] So we decided to come back and take care of this. [01:08:54.100 --> 01:09:00.100] We called into the show and asked Eddie what the best pact was. [01:09:00.100 --> 01:09:05.100] He said to fill out some affidavits and file him with the district attorney, which I agree with. [01:09:05.100 --> 01:09:07.100] District attorneys report all the crimes. [01:09:07.100 --> 01:09:08.100] Okay, here. [01:09:08.100 --> 01:09:12.100] Okay, this was a point that brought up a question. [01:09:12.100 --> 01:09:14.100] You're in Florida? [01:09:14.100 --> 01:09:15.100] I'm not in Florida anymore. [01:09:15.100 --> 01:09:17.100] I'm in New York now. [01:09:17.100 --> 01:09:21.100] Okay. [01:09:21.100 --> 01:09:26.100] Where did the accusations you made, where are they made at? [01:09:26.100 --> 01:09:28.100] In Florida or New York? [01:09:28.100 --> 01:09:30.100] In New York, in Rosendale, New York. [01:09:30.100 --> 01:09:39.100] What is the duty of the prosecuting attorney when he receives a criminal complaint from a citizen? [01:09:39.100 --> 01:09:43.100] He is supposed to bring it to the grand jury for examination. [01:09:43.100 --> 01:09:45.100] What does the law say? [01:09:45.100 --> 01:09:48.100] I'm not asking for an opinion. [01:09:48.100 --> 01:09:52.100] What does the statutes require him to do? [01:09:52.100 --> 01:09:59.100] In Texas, 2.03 says when a prosecuting attorney is made known in any manner that a public official violated law [01:09:59.100 --> 01:10:02.100] written to his office, he shall reduce complaint from information. [01:10:02.100 --> 01:10:07.100] When he's made known by affidavit that a crime has been committed, [01:10:07.100 --> 01:10:10.100] he shall reduce complaint from information submitted to the grand jury. [01:10:10.100 --> 01:10:12.100] What does it say in New York? [01:10:12.100 --> 01:10:17.100] Okay, I read the Constitution in New York, but I forgot. [01:10:17.100 --> 01:10:19.100] Wait, this is not in Constitution. [01:10:19.100 --> 01:10:21.100] It's going to be in statute. [01:10:21.100 --> 01:10:27.100] There will be a set of statutes defining the duties of the prosecuting attorney. [01:10:27.100 --> 01:10:35.100] If we're going to take these guys to task, we have to know their duty better than they do. [01:10:35.100 --> 01:10:37.100] Exactly. [01:10:37.100 --> 01:10:45.100] Before you assume he's doing something wrong, make certain he is, [01:10:45.100 --> 01:10:51.100] and make certain you can stipulate precisely what he's doing wrong. [01:10:51.100 --> 01:11:00.100] In Pennsylvania, a prosecuting attorney has discretion to determine whether or not he wants to pursue a prostitution. [01:11:00.100 --> 01:11:04.100] You need to be sure that's not the case in New York. [01:11:04.100 --> 01:11:13.100] Before you try to hold him responsible, I'm not trying to misdirect you or thwart what you're doing, [01:11:13.100 --> 01:11:22.100] but if you must look at the law first, go read the duties of officers in New York. [01:11:22.100 --> 01:11:24.100] It's not going to be much. [01:11:24.100 --> 01:11:29.100] It'll probably be a paragraph or two that will define their duties. [01:11:29.100 --> 01:11:39.100] Once you've defined their duties, craft what you do based specifically on what they're required to do. [01:11:39.100 --> 01:11:46.100] From what you said, I don't think you know exactly what he's required to do. [01:11:46.100 --> 01:11:48.100] Have you read those codes? [01:11:48.100 --> 01:11:49.100] But now what's the next step? [01:11:49.100 --> 01:11:52.100] I've got to get these things quashed. [01:11:52.100 --> 01:11:59.100] I didn't do any motions yet because I didn't expect what happened. [01:11:59.100 --> 01:12:10.100] I figured if she brought her affidavit stating clearly the criminal actions of her son, [01:12:10.100 --> 01:12:13.100] the police would pick up on it and go... [01:12:13.100 --> 01:12:16.100] Okay, stop, stop. [01:12:16.100 --> 01:12:18.100] We need to stop doing that. [01:12:18.100 --> 01:12:21.100] Do not expect the police to do their job. [01:12:21.100 --> 01:12:23.100] That's what I'm saying. [01:12:23.100 --> 01:12:27.100] I'm not going over there because they're just going to throw me in jail for another year. [01:12:27.100 --> 01:12:28.100] Don't go over there. [01:12:28.100 --> 01:12:29.100] No, don't listen. [01:12:29.100 --> 01:12:30.100] Stop. [01:12:30.100 --> 01:12:31.100] Read the book. [01:12:31.100 --> 01:12:34.100] Read the code. [01:12:34.100 --> 01:12:41.100] You need to be able to stipulate specifically what the law requires them to do. [01:12:41.100 --> 01:12:45.100] If you can't do that, you have no idea what you're doing. [01:12:45.100 --> 01:12:47.100] You don't know what you're getting into. [01:12:47.100 --> 01:12:53.100] Well, I'm not going to turn myself in if I can file all my motions first [01:12:53.100 --> 01:12:59.100] and get it all on the record before they give me some dumb, stupid attorney to try to sell me out. [01:12:59.100 --> 01:13:01.100] Wait a minute. [01:13:01.100 --> 01:13:04.100] What motions are you going to file based on what law? [01:13:04.100 --> 01:13:08.100] I'm going to file a motion to quash these false... [01:13:08.100 --> 01:13:11.100] Based on what? [01:13:11.100 --> 01:13:14.100] Based on the fact that there's no evidence. [01:13:14.100 --> 01:13:17.100] How do you establish that there's no evidence? [01:13:17.100 --> 01:13:19.100] The kid's obviously lying. [01:13:19.100 --> 01:13:26.100] We got two affidavits against his crap story that he can't even verify. [01:13:26.100 --> 01:13:32.100] Is his story that he filed filed in the form of an affidavit? [01:13:32.100 --> 01:13:34.100] No, I'm sure it's not. [01:13:34.100 --> 01:13:36.100] He's a kid. [01:13:36.100 --> 01:13:38.100] I'm just... [01:13:38.100 --> 01:13:43.100] See, you're doing this from the perspective that what he's saying is a bunch of crap. [01:13:43.100 --> 01:13:46.100] It is a bunch of crap. [01:13:46.100 --> 01:13:50.100] He's probably on the other side saying what they're saying is a bunch of crap, [01:13:50.100 --> 01:13:55.100] and you've got somebody in the middle looking at this and saying, [01:13:55.100 --> 01:14:00.100] who's giving me a bunch of crap here, or has everybody given me a bunch of crap? [01:14:00.100 --> 01:14:07.100] You have someone who has to stand in the middle and doesn't know what you know. [01:14:07.100 --> 01:14:12.100] Okay, so we got his mother, who I had to try... [01:14:12.100 --> 01:14:16.100] Wait, I don't need to go through all of those details again. [01:14:16.100 --> 01:14:22.100] What does the law command the police to do? [01:14:22.100 --> 01:14:27.100] Okay, so the next step is to... [01:14:27.100 --> 01:14:32.100] I'm going to be heading with all the cops now. [01:14:32.100 --> 01:14:33.100] What am I going to do? [01:14:33.100 --> 01:14:35.100] I've got to go through the cops now? [01:14:35.100 --> 01:14:39.100] You're still trying to run ahead and get retribution. [01:14:39.100 --> 01:14:41.100] Stop doing that. [01:14:41.100 --> 01:14:44.100] I'm not, Randy. I don't want to deal with this at all. [01:14:44.100 --> 01:14:46.100] What is the law? [01:14:46.100 --> 01:14:52.100] If you don't know what the law is, they're going to clobber you. [01:14:52.100 --> 01:14:57.100] You're going to file what you think is a very effective document, [01:14:57.100 --> 01:15:00.100] and they're just going to walk right over you. [01:15:00.100 --> 01:15:06.100] Well, I filed my affidavit, and I stopped there because I know that all I have to do is state the facts. [01:15:06.100 --> 01:15:10.100] My facts and my girlfriend's facts line up. [01:15:10.100 --> 01:15:15.100] Even though we have different perspectives, they both line up on all the points. [01:15:15.100 --> 01:15:18.100] Okay, how do you... [01:15:18.100 --> 01:15:29.100] What actions can you take to force the prosecuting attorney to give credence to your affidavits? [01:15:29.100 --> 01:15:30.100] What can I do? [01:15:30.100 --> 01:15:36.100] Okay, I can do what you like to do, which is make them do their job. [01:15:36.100 --> 01:15:41.100] No, no. You see, they're talking in generalities, and I'm trying to make a real point here. [01:15:41.100 --> 01:15:44.100] We really have to go back and read the code. [01:15:44.100 --> 01:15:47.100] Have you been through a jurisdictionary? [01:15:47.100 --> 01:15:52.100] Yes, I have. I go through it every day, but I just don't have the... [01:15:52.100 --> 01:15:57.100] You have to have a support system for it because it's just so foreign to you. [01:15:57.100 --> 01:15:59.100] You've been brainwashed your whole life. [01:15:59.100 --> 01:16:00.100] I understand. [01:16:00.100 --> 01:16:06.100] Okay, have you read the criminal procedure code for New York? [01:16:06.100 --> 01:16:11.100] Two or three times, and I still don't get it. I'm just brainwashed. [01:16:11.100 --> 01:16:12.100] Penal code. [01:16:12.100 --> 01:16:17.100] I can't believe what's going on. I'm in shock, and I don't want to be just disabled. [01:16:17.100 --> 01:16:20.100] I feel like I'm a retard or something. I'm very intelligent. [01:16:20.100 --> 01:16:32.100] Okay, what we have to do is back up and look at the duties given to public officials and invoke their duties. [01:16:32.100 --> 01:16:35.100] Okay, we're about to go to break, and we'll pick this up on the other side. [01:16:35.100 --> 01:16:38.100] We're going to have to move kind of quickly because we've had a lot of calls. [01:16:38.100 --> 01:16:39.100] Okay, bye. [01:16:39.100 --> 01:16:43.100] What we're into here is pretty complex, so it will take a while. [01:16:43.100 --> 01:16:50.100] Let me address what I think you need to do on the other side, and then we need to move on to other calls. [01:16:50.100 --> 01:16:53.100] I hate to cut you short, but this is important to you. [01:16:53.100 --> 01:16:57.100] This is Randy Caltron, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig with Law Radio. [01:16:57.100 --> 01:17:00.100] We'll be right back. [01:17:00.100 --> 01:17:07.100] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. [01:17:07.100 --> 01:17:09.100] We also ship worldwide. [01:17:09.100 --> 01:17:14.100] We're a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases. [01:17:14.100 --> 01:17:20.100] Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location. [01:17:20.100 --> 01:17:27.100] We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location. [01:17:27.100 --> 01:17:32.100] We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor, [01:17:32.100 --> 01:17:35.100] next to the Ishiban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash. [01:17:35.100 --> 01:17:39.100] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5. [01:17:39.100 --> 01:17:45.100] You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440. [01:17:45.100 --> 01:17:50.100] Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio. [01:17:50.100 --> 01:18:00.100] That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A or call 512-646-6440. [01:18:00.100 --> 01:18:04.100] My name is Randall Caltron, and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio. [01:18:04.100 --> 01:18:09.100] We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials. [01:18:09.100 --> 01:18:15.100] With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people who have been cheated by their lenders. [01:18:15.100 --> 01:18:22.100] If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of thousands, but there is a remedy. [01:18:22.100 --> 01:18:30.100] Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 [01:18:30.100 --> 01:18:37.100] and find out how to use the consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception. [01:18:37.100 --> 01:18:43.100] We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime. [01:18:43.100 --> 01:18:48.100] Lender fraud is bankrupting this country, and it's time to fight back. [01:18:48.100 --> 01:18:55.100] Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 [01:18:55.100 --> 01:19:00.100] and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks. [01:19:00.100 --> 01:19:25.100] Okay, this is Randy Caltron, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio, we're back, we're talking to Frank of New York. [01:19:25.100 --> 01:19:34.100] We need to cut you off, but we could spend the whole rest of the show on the details of what's happening to you. [01:19:34.100 --> 01:19:38.100] And it's all going to go to the same place. [01:19:38.100 --> 01:19:47.100] If you want these public officials to do something, you have to go in and read the code [01:19:47.100 --> 01:19:55.100] and find the law that tells them that they're required to do what you're asking them to do and then directly invoke that. [01:19:55.100 --> 01:20:04.100] Once I called into the city of Austin and told them that a certain person had been arrested, [01:20:04.100 --> 01:20:15.100] and I want to see the criminal complaint as defined by 1403 Code of Criminal Procedure [01:20:15.100 --> 01:20:25.100] and that it was required of the magistrate that he make it available for public inspection immediately after execution [01:20:25.100 --> 01:20:29.100] in accordance with 1516 Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:20:29.100 --> 01:20:38.100] And I want to see all of the records had in the examining trial that were forwarded to the clerk in accordance with 17.30 Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:20:38.100 --> 01:20:46.100] And the clerk on the other side said, I will see what I can do. [01:20:46.100 --> 01:20:53.100] It took her about five minutes and she told me exactly where I could go see exactly what I asked for. [01:20:53.100 --> 01:20:56.100] That is how you have to do it. [01:20:56.100 --> 01:21:06.100] You can't just say, well, I think they should do something this way and then act as if they should do it. [01:21:06.100 --> 01:21:11.100] But in the end, be angry and frustrated when they don't. [01:21:11.100 --> 01:21:15.100] You have to put the details in their face. [01:21:15.100 --> 01:21:22.100] So go back, consider what you want to do. [01:21:22.100 --> 01:21:31.100] Go back to the Code of Criminal Procedure Code and call us either tomorrow or next Thursday if you don't have time by tomorrow. [01:21:31.100 --> 01:21:39.100] And tell us what code tells these officials that they must do what you're asking them to do. [01:21:39.100 --> 01:21:44.100] If you can't do that, you're spinning your wheels. [01:21:44.100 --> 01:21:46.100] OK, we really have to move on. [01:21:46.100 --> 01:21:50.100] We've got six other callers and three segments left. [01:21:50.100 --> 01:21:52.100] We really have to move along. [01:21:52.100 --> 01:21:56.100] So that's your homework assignment. [01:21:56.100 --> 01:22:00.100] OK. [01:22:00.100 --> 01:22:06.100] Oh, she was alive. [01:22:06.100 --> 01:22:10.100] OK, we're going to go now to Evangeline in Pennsylvania. [01:22:10.100 --> 01:22:12.100] Evangeline, thank you for calling in. [01:22:12.100 --> 01:22:15.100] What is your question for us tonight? [01:22:15.100 --> 01:22:17.100] Hi, how are you? [01:22:17.100 --> 01:22:18.100] Good. [01:22:18.100 --> 01:22:22.100] I sent an email earlier this afternoon. [01:22:22.100 --> 01:22:24.100] I don't know if you guys got that. [01:22:24.100 --> 01:22:25.100] My husband told me. [01:22:25.100 --> 01:22:27.100] Who did you send it to? [01:22:27.100 --> 01:22:30.100] Did you send it to the Randy Kelton? [01:22:30.100 --> 01:22:31.100] No. [01:22:31.100 --> 01:22:35.100] I copied and pasted it directly from the Web site. [01:22:35.100 --> 01:22:37.100] No, I didn't see it yet. [01:22:37.100 --> 01:22:42.100] I spent about two hours on remedies and real estate and I didn't get to read as well today. [01:22:42.100 --> 01:22:43.100] That's fine. [01:22:43.100 --> 01:22:44.100] No problem. [01:22:44.100 --> 01:22:47.100] I get lots of emails. [01:22:47.100 --> 01:22:56.100] The matter I'm calling to inquire about I guess is kind of more civil, but I thought you might be able to give me some guidance. [01:22:56.100 --> 01:23:11.100] I'm a veteran and I recently applied for a veteran's workforce investment program thing that's a funding for taking a college course. [01:23:11.100 --> 01:23:31.100] I was told I was approved and that this agency, it's like a government run civilian thing, like they have a contract for the government to dish out these funds or whatever, said that they would pay the fees for the course and for the material. [01:23:31.100 --> 01:23:41.100] The course fees were to be paid directly to the college and the material fees were to be paid to the instructor. [01:23:41.100 --> 01:23:44.100] The college said fine and they enrolled me in the course. [01:23:44.100 --> 01:23:56.100] The instructor said that it was fine, but that just in case things fell through with the third party that he wanted to take a check from me for security deposit and that he wouldn't cash the check unless things fell through. [01:23:56.100 --> 01:24:05.100] I'm still in the course and a few days ago, less than five days ago, I got an email from the instructor saying where's my money? [01:24:05.100 --> 01:24:16.100] I replied to him with the contact information for the third party and I called the third party and they said that it's in process, that he's going to be paid. [01:24:16.100 --> 01:24:23.100] He has emailed me and called me repeatedly over the last few days. [01:24:23.100 --> 01:24:27.100] He's threatened me. He's told me that he had recorded me. [01:24:27.100 --> 01:24:30.100] When he told me he recorded me, I said that's illegal. [01:24:30.100 --> 01:24:33.100] This is a two-party consent state. [01:24:33.100 --> 01:24:35.100] You're in Pennsylvania? [01:24:35.100 --> 01:24:36.100] Yeah. [01:24:36.100 --> 01:24:39.100] That's a felony in Pennsylvania. [01:24:39.100 --> 01:24:41.100] Oh, yeah? [01:24:41.100 --> 01:24:43.100] Yes, it is. [01:24:43.100 --> 01:24:51.100] In Texas, you can record any conversation you're a party to, not in Pennsylvania. [01:24:51.100 --> 01:24:58.100] Right. Well, he said after I told him this is a two-party consent state, he said, well, I recorded myself. [01:24:58.100 --> 01:25:01.100] Then he said he recorded his side of the conversation. [01:25:01.100 --> 01:25:11.100] But I received an email again from him today where he said that he had, basically he said that he had, not verbatim, [01:25:11.100 --> 01:25:17.100] but he implied that he had a recording of the person who was assisting me from the agency [01:25:17.100 --> 01:25:25.100] and that that person, he was able to do so because that person agreed to be put on speakerphone, [01:25:25.100 --> 01:25:31.100] thereby nullifying any indication of privacy. [01:25:31.100 --> 01:25:33.100] No, that's not true. [01:25:33.100 --> 01:25:34.100] It didn't sound right to me. [01:25:34.100 --> 01:25:36.100] I mean, speakerphone doesn't mean you're being recorded. [01:25:36.100 --> 01:25:38.100] I think there's a significant difference. [01:25:38.100 --> 01:25:42.100] No, he's got to expressly tell them they're being recorded. [01:25:42.100 --> 01:25:45.100] If he failed to do that, he's up the creek. [01:25:45.100 --> 01:25:47.100] We're talking about Pennsylvania here. [01:25:47.100 --> 01:25:50.100] We're not talking about the United States. [01:25:50.100 --> 01:25:51.100] I know that. [01:25:51.100 --> 01:25:52.100] Yeah, we know. [01:25:52.100 --> 01:25:55.100] Pennsylvania is another animal. [01:25:55.100 --> 01:26:04.100] It sounds like he may have done his homework in an area of case law going to expectation of privacy. [01:26:04.100 --> 01:26:09.100] Now, the way I read the statute in Pennsylvania, I don't think so. [01:26:09.100 --> 01:26:10.100] I think he's wrong. [01:26:10.100 --> 01:26:12.100] No, we've read the statute in Pennsylvania. [01:26:12.100 --> 01:26:13.100] That's not the way it is. [01:26:13.100 --> 01:26:18.100] If it's a telephone call, it doesn't matter whether one of the parties is on speakerphone or not. [01:26:18.100 --> 01:26:22.100] You can't do it unless you've got the other person's consent. [01:26:22.100 --> 01:26:27.100] Before I said definitively, I don't want to look at the case law, but it doesn't sound right. [01:26:27.100 --> 01:26:28.100] I think he's wrong. [01:26:28.100 --> 01:26:30.100] I think he's trying to cover his behind. [01:26:30.100 --> 01:26:31.100] Yeah, that's right. [01:26:31.100 --> 01:26:33.100] He's really slick. [01:26:33.100 --> 01:26:37.100] Throughout our conversations, he keeps kind of just saying whatever he needs to say. [01:26:37.100 --> 01:26:39.100] I did a little digging on him. [01:26:39.100 --> 01:26:41.100] I don't know if I'm supposed to or not. [01:26:41.100 --> 01:26:47.100] It appears as though he has some kind of financial issues of his own, bankruptcy, whatever, [01:26:47.100 --> 01:26:49.100] because it's really puzzling to me. [01:26:49.100 --> 01:26:51.100] This guy is supposed to have a doctorate. [01:26:51.100 --> 01:26:59.100] The aggression with which he's pursuing me, I just feel like there's something askew, [01:26:59.100 --> 01:27:04.100] as does the person who is working for the agency who's providing the funding for the course. [01:27:04.100 --> 01:27:11.100] My problem is I called the college, I called the executive director of the program. [01:27:11.100 --> 01:27:15.100] By the way, the course is for hypnotherapy. [01:27:15.100 --> 01:27:20.100] He's supposed to have a doctorate, although hypnotherapy doesn't require a license. [01:27:20.100 --> 01:27:27.100] He says that he has a license as a counselor, and he said that his doctorate was in sociology. [01:27:27.100 --> 01:27:33.100] I couldn't find anything anywhere to say where he went to school, so I'm kind of even suspicious of that. [01:27:33.100 --> 01:27:37.100] Everything has just been really strange in my experience. [01:27:37.100 --> 01:27:41.100] I have a degree, I've been to a lot of different college courses, and it's just weird. [01:27:41.100 --> 01:27:48.100] And then having him come after me for this money, for these materials in the process by which he's doing it. [01:27:48.100 --> 01:27:51.100] Okay, there's a couple suggestions here. [01:27:51.100 --> 01:28:00.100] One is whatever entity was required to fund this, send them a tort letter. [01:28:00.100 --> 01:28:06.100] Tell them you have been harmed, make you whole, or be sued. [01:28:06.100 --> 01:28:10.100] And also look at sending this professor. [01:28:10.100 --> 01:28:17.100] I'd want to do more research on this professor and make sure of your details. [01:28:17.100 --> 01:28:22.100] If you do a standard search for his credentials and you don't find them, [01:28:22.100 --> 01:28:26.100] that's a reasonable problem because he maybe doesn't have them. [01:28:26.100 --> 01:28:33.100] Is he associated with a university or some other recognized... [01:28:33.100 --> 01:28:37.100] The course that I'm taking is being offered through a community college, [01:28:37.100 --> 01:28:44.100] but it's an adult education program, and there's a variety of different non-credential courses that are being offered, [01:28:44.100 --> 01:28:49.100] so it's possible that they didn't bother to check whether or not he actually has the degree that he professed to have. [01:28:49.100 --> 01:28:52.100] In my experience, most of the time when you take a... [01:28:52.100 --> 01:28:57.100] If somebody has a doctorate, you can find a lot of information about this guy, [01:28:57.100 --> 01:29:00.100] but you can't find anything about where he went to school, [01:29:00.100 --> 01:29:04.100] and he was pretty vague about it when I asked him because I thought it was weird. [01:29:04.100 --> 01:29:10.100] But the problem that I'm having, or the most disturbing part of this, is that I gave him this check, [01:29:10.100 --> 01:29:13.100] and on the bottom of the check I wrote, for security deposit, [01:29:13.100 --> 01:29:18.100] and we had a verbal agreement that he would hold onto the check unless things fell through with the third party, [01:29:18.100 --> 01:29:22.100] which they haven't. The third party is still maintaining that he's going to be able to get paid, [01:29:22.100 --> 01:29:25.100] that he just needs to have some patience because it's a thing that takes some time, [01:29:25.100 --> 01:29:27.100] and most places are... [01:29:27.100 --> 01:29:30.100] Quickly, we ran out of time. Did he cash the check? [01:29:30.100 --> 01:29:33.100] He didn't. He told me he was going to deposit it tomorrow, [01:29:33.100 --> 01:29:37.100] so the person at the agency told me to cancel the check, which I did, [01:29:37.100 --> 01:29:42.100] and I advised him that I canceled the check, and then he implied as though he was going to take some sort of legal action. [01:29:42.100 --> 01:29:45.100] Okay. We're about to go to break. [01:29:45.100 --> 01:29:49.100] We'll pick this up on the other side, but we need to move quick. We've got lots of callers. [01:29:49.100 --> 01:30:16.100] This is Randy Kelton, and we'll be right back. [01:30:19.100 --> 01:30:23.100] Call 512-294-8429 or find us at austincleanandclear.com. [01:30:23.100 --> 01:30:30.100] Our gardens are the perfect combination of beauty and practicality. Call 512-294-8429 today. [01:30:30.100 --> 01:30:36.100] Take a whiff of that. Onions may have a scrambling for breath mints, but they might also save our lives. [01:30:36.100 --> 01:30:43.100] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with some reasons to spice up your food with the power of onions. [01:30:43.100 --> 01:30:51.100] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information. [01:30:51.100 --> 01:30:52.100] That's creepy. [01:30:52.100 --> 01:30:57.100] But it doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [01:30:57.100 --> 01:31:03.100] Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified. [01:31:03.100 --> 01:31:10.100] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy. [01:31:10.100 --> 01:31:13.100] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:13.100 --> 01:31:21.100] An onion a day could keep the doctor away. Common onions are brimming with antioxidants that help fend off serious health problems. [01:31:21.100 --> 01:31:29.100] Studies have shown these chemicals can help protect against deadly cancers. They're also associated with a reduced risk of heart disease, diabetes, and cataracts. [01:31:29.100 --> 01:31:38.100] But not all onions are created equal. Cornell University researchers say strong-flavored varieties have the highest antioxidant and cancer-protected properties. [01:31:38.100 --> 01:31:43.100] Those include the Western Yellow, the New York Bold, and Northern Red varieties. [01:31:43.100 --> 01:31:51.100] While mild and sweet onions like the Vidalia may be yummy, they contain fewer health-boosting chemicals and offer little protection against cancer. [01:31:51.100 --> 01:32:09.100] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:32:21.100 --> 01:32:48.100] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [01:32:48.100 --> 01:32:54.100] Okay, we're back. [01:32:54.100 --> 01:33:01.100] We're talking to Evangeline in Pennsylvania. [01:33:01.100 --> 01:33:06.100] Evangeline, we need to get directly to the point. [01:33:06.100 --> 01:33:10.100] What is the question or the issue that you have? [01:33:10.100 --> 01:33:18.100] Given that he violated a verbal agreement, do you think I could be culpable for canceling that check? [01:33:18.100 --> 01:33:21.100] Is there some kind of legal ramification there? That's my first question. [01:33:21.100 --> 01:33:33.100] And my second question is while he's calling me, emailing me, and being rather threatening and harassing, he's saying that he's not speaking to me as a course instructor. [01:33:33.100 --> 01:33:41.100] He's representing his master's center by – I probably shouldn't say that – his LLC. He has an LLC, you know, whatever. [01:33:41.100 --> 01:33:49.100] So given that he's coming at me in that regard, is he held to the standard of bill collector? [01:33:49.100 --> 01:33:58.100] No, no. He won't be a bill collector because he would be the original detor. [01:33:58.100 --> 01:34:00.100] Okay, right, yes. [01:34:00.100 --> 01:34:05.100] He falls under – if you're a third-party bill collector, you fall under a hold. [01:34:05.100 --> 01:34:14.100] There are certain things that he's subject to, but he's not the third party that has a whole lot more restrictions. [01:34:14.100 --> 01:34:17.100] The issues here are more serious here. [01:34:17.100 --> 01:34:23.100] I think from the sound of the issue, the real issue is with the funding agency. [01:34:23.100 --> 01:34:26.100] They're the problem. They haven't funded. [01:34:26.100 --> 01:34:31.100] You know, I'm a veteran. I went to school on the GI Bill, and the GIs didn't pay their bills. [01:34:31.100 --> 01:34:36.100] Right. It's not – it's actually not through the VA. [01:34:36.100 --> 01:34:40.100] It's some funding that was allotted for a program, but it's not through the VA. [01:34:40.100 --> 01:34:47.100] It's like a – it is government funding, but it's – like I said, it's called a veteran's workforce investment program, and they haven't – [01:34:47.100 --> 01:34:53.100] Whoever it is, see the head of the agency. [01:34:53.100 --> 01:34:57.100] What about this guy in my check in the meantime? [01:34:57.100 --> 01:35:02.100] You can call in and wipe out the head of the agency, and that may help, but not much. [01:35:02.100 --> 01:35:17.100] But if you send them a tort letter and tell them that your failure to act in a timely manner and properly fund this program has harmed me, [01:35:17.100 --> 01:35:31.100] and state the full cost of this course, and whatever else other harm it may cause you, and demand that they make you hold or be sued, [01:35:31.100 --> 01:35:40.100] I can guarantee you when they get that tort letter, their legal department's going to get the tort letter, [01:35:40.100 --> 01:35:45.100] and whoever the director of this agency is is going to get real excited. [01:35:45.100 --> 01:35:49.100] And they're going to go down to these people who are supposed to get this done, [01:35:49.100 --> 01:35:56.100] and they're going to say, this particular wheel is squeaking very loudly. [01:35:56.100 --> 01:35:58.100] Fix it. [01:35:58.100 --> 01:35:59.100] Right. [01:35:59.100 --> 01:36:09.100] Well, I do – like I said, the person at the agency has insisted that, you know, they're working hard to get the payment. [01:36:09.100 --> 01:36:13.100] They've spoken with the instructor many times and said, deal with it. [01:36:13.100 --> 01:36:16.100] Wait a minute. You were in the military. [01:36:16.100 --> 01:36:17.100] Yes. [01:36:17.100 --> 01:36:26.100] You've got to know better than that. Blah, blah. Go to the head of the agency. [01:36:26.100 --> 01:36:28.100] You are now a civilian. [01:36:28.100 --> 01:36:29.100] Right. [01:36:29.100 --> 01:36:37.100] And when I was on a military base, if a general showed up, we had to clean up the whole base and do everything, but we had to worry about the general. [01:36:37.100 --> 01:36:45.100] But civilians? Civilians were bad news. You really had to watch civilians. [01:36:45.100 --> 01:36:46.100] Right. [01:36:46.100 --> 01:36:52.100] Because a civilian can go to the commander's office and chew out the commander like he was an errant stepchild. [01:36:52.100 --> 01:36:53.100] Right. [01:36:53.100 --> 01:36:56.100] I suggest you do just exactly that. [01:36:56.100 --> 01:36:59.100] Well, can I ask a question here real quick? [01:36:59.100 --> 01:37:00.100] Sure. [01:37:00.100 --> 01:37:08.100] On these communications you say that you've had with this professor, did he put in writing in any of these that he made those recordings? [01:37:08.100 --> 01:37:16.100] Yes. What he says is – I wish I had it verbatim, and I put my thing up here just so I could, but I don't want to waste your time. [01:37:16.100 --> 01:37:20.100] But he doesn't say in writing that I have the recording. [01:37:20.100 --> 01:37:26.100] He says in writing that if I want to listen to the conversation, I can, and that he – [01:37:26.100 --> 01:37:28.100] That's enough. He's right. [01:37:28.100 --> 01:37:39.100] Now you need to go find you someone to make a certified copy of that recording, and you need to get you a criminal complaint written up and attached to it. [01:37:39.100 --> 01:37:43.100] And just for grins, send him a copy of it in the mail. [01:37:43.100 --> 01:37:48.100] Okay. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Why? Why would you want to do that? What is your intended outcome? [01:37:48.100 --> 01:37:49.100] My concern is – [01:37:49.100 --> 01:37:51.100] The intended outcome here is to see – [01:37:51.100 --> 01:37:54.100] You can't say that. You can't say that, Eddie. [01:37:54.100 --> 01:37:55.100] Yes? [01:37:55.100 --> 01:38:00.100] Angeline, what is your intended outcome? What do you want to achieve? [01:38:00.100 --> 01:38:07.100] My concern is right now that he has said that he is going to take action with the check, which I have canceled. [01:38:07.100 --> 01:38:18.100] So between now and filling out the tort and getting it to these people and lighting a fire under somebody and all that stuff, I mean, if you write a check and, you know, like, I've canceled it – [01:38:18.100 --> 01:38:22.100] No, no, no. What do you want in the end? [01:38:22.100 --> 01:38:26.100] I don't want to go to jail for writing a bad check. [01:38:26.100 --> 01:38:33.100] Not a problem. Not a problem. The check wasn't intended to be cashed anyway. That won't be a problem. [01:38:33.100 --> 01:38:35.100] Okay. [01:38:35.100 --> 01:38:42.100] So the only way that would happen is if you went through the whole course and the other party never paid the check. [01:38:42.100 --> 01:38:43.100] Right. [01:38:43.100 --> 01:38:51.100] And so you have reasonable probable cause to stop paying him on the check because you can't verify his credentials. [01:38:51.100 --> 01:38:53.100] Right. Okay. [01:38:53.100 --> 01:38:55.100] You're covered. You don't have a problem there. [01:38:55.100 --> 01:39:03.100] You're not going to get in trouble for writing a bad check because it's not like you wrote a check and then somebody went to cash it and the funds weren't there. [01:39:03.100 --> 01:39:08.100] That's writing a bad check. In this stage, all you've done is cancel a check. [01:39:08.100 --> 01:39:15.100] And so if he's saying that you owe him the money anyway, that is a civil tort issue. That is not a criminal tort issue. [01:39:15.100 --> 01:39:17.100] He would have to sue you for the money. [01:39:17.100 --> 01:39:21.100] So you're not going to get in trouble for writing a bad check. There is no bad check. [01:39:21.100 --> 01:39:22.100] Okay. [01:39:22.100 --> 01:39:23.100] Do you understand what I'm saying? [01:39:23.100 --> 01:39:31.100] A bad check is when you write a check and then the other person goes to cash it and the money's not there. That's a bad check. That's not what you did. [01:39:31.100 --> 01:39:32.100] Okay. [01:39:32.100 --> 01:39:40.100] Yeah. The only other way they could do that is if you wrote a check to him with the intent that it be cashed because of a service or good he provided, [01:39:40.100 --> 01:39:46.100] but before he could do it, you went and had the check stopped payment on. You didn't do that either. [01:39:46.100 --> 01:39:47.100] No. [01:39:47.100 --> 01:39:54.100] You stopped payment because you had concern that they weren't living up to their end of the contract. [01:39:54.100 --> 01:39:55.100] That's right. [01:39:55.100 --> 01:39:57.100] That this guy wasn't who he said he was. You're okay there. [01:39:57.100 --> 01:39:58.100] Okay. [01:39:58.100 --> 01:40:03.100] But then again, what do you want? Do you want to finish this course? Do you want credit for this course? [01:40:03.100 --> 01:40:05.100] I am going to go ahead and finish it. [01:40:05.100 --> 01:40:10.100] Or do you want to kick this guy's butt? What do you really want as an outcome? [01:40:10.100 --> 01:40:19.100] I want to finish the course and I would like to know if he's credentialed and I'd like that to be addressed if he's not. [01:40:19.100 --> 01:40:22.100] But otherwise, I just want to finish the course and not... [01:40:22.100 --> 01:40:27.100] I suggest you go to this professor and say, look, I can't find any background on you. [01:40:27.100 --> 01:40:32.100] I'm not sure you're a valid professor, but right now I'm not so concerned about that. [01:40:32.100 --> 01:40:37.100] I'm concerned that I'm working on these other people to get you paid. [01:40:37.100 --> 01:40:40.100] You don't mess with me. I won't mess with you. [01:40:40.100 --> 01:40:47.100] Let's finish this thing rather than going after him criminally because that's going to bore you in a big mess. [01:40:47.100 --> 01:40:51.100] That's why I ask, what is it that you want in the end? [01:40:51.100 --> 01:40:57.100] There's a lot of things you can do, but you may not want to because they may not give you the outcome that you want. [01:40:57.100 --> 01:41:00.100] I am afraid we have to move on. [01:41:00.100 --> 01:41:07.100] You might try calling back in to moan off, tomorrow night we're going to have to put in an archive. [01:41:07.100 --> 01:41:13.100] I apologize to everybody for that, but I'm going to be traveling and Debbie's tied up tomorrow. [01:41:13.100 --> 01:41:18.100] She was hoping Eddie and I could do it, but I'm traveling to New York, so I won't be here. [01:41:18.100 --> 01:41:24.100] So don't get mad at us. If we're not there tomorrow night, we'll put in an archive and you won't be able to call in. [01:41:24.100 --> 01:41:33.100] But call us in next week. After you've kind of looked this over and decided how best to achieve your ultimate outcome, [01:41:33.100 --> 01:41:36.100] and don't worry about the check. You're okay on the check. [01:41:36.100 --> 01:41:40.100] All right. Well, that was my biggest concern, so thanks a lot for straightening that out for me. [01:41:40.100 --> 01:41:42.100] All right. Thank you, Evangeline. [01:41:42.100 --> 01:41:43.100] All right. Thanks. Have a good night. [01:41:43.100 --> 01:41:44.100] Okay. Good night. [01:41:44.100 --> 01:41:45.100] See you. [01:41:45.100 --> 01:41:48.100] Okay. We're going now to Paul in Kentucky. [01:41:48.100 --> 01:41:52.100] Paul, thank you for calling in. What is your question for us tonight? [01:41:52.100 --> 01:41:56.100] I'll try to be as direct as I can. Well, I'm first time caller, so it's a pleasure to meet you. [01:41:56.100 --> 01:41:57.100] Well, thank you very much. [01:41:57.100 --> 01:42:03.100] Yes, and Paul, you'll be glad to know that I used to live in Tennessee just south of the Kentucky line. [01:42:03.100 --> 01:42:04.100] Uh-huh. [01:42:04.100 --> 01:42:07.100] So I can speak your strange foreign dialect. [01:42:07.100 --> 01:42:12.100] Well, just real quick, it is really foreign and strange because when people ask me where I'm from, [01:42:12.100 --> 01:42:16.100] I say I'm from Boston, and then I pause, and then I say Kentucky, [01:42:16.100 --> 01:42:21.100] because I'm originally from Boston, Massachusetts, but I now live in Kentucky, and there is a Boston, Kentucky. [01:42:21.100 --> 01:42:25.100] So it really messes with your mind a little bit. Have a lot of fun with that. [01:42:25.100 --> 01:42:32.100] My question is concerning foreclosure, and I unfortunately get on the call about 20, 25 minutes late, [01:42:32.100 --> 01:42:36.100] so I missed a portion of what you were talking about, Randy. [01:42:36.100 --> 01:42:41.100] Bottom line is I bought a home four years ago. It was a second home. [01:42:41.100 --> 01:42:47.100] It was just I didn't know if I was going to rent it or whatever, but 18 months ago I separated from my wife. [01:42:47.100 --> 01:42:50.100] My wife is the primary on the loan. I'm on the deed. [01:42:50.100 --> 01:42:57.100] She has not paid anything toward it, and when we sold our primary residence about, well, 18, 18 to 20, [01:42:57.100 --> 01:43:05.100] well, October of end of September of 10 is when we, I'm sorry, of 9 is when we sold the other house. [01:43:05.100 --> 01:43:08.100] I've been living in the second home. That was my primary residence. [01:43:08.100 --> 01:43:14.100] Paid the mortgage for two, two and a half years, and then through a massive decline in my income, [01:43:14.100 --> 01:43:16.100] I wasn't able to make the payments. [01:43:16.100 --> 01:43:21.100] The house was supposed to sell at the courthouse steps on November the 18th of this year, [01:43:21.100 --> 01:43:26.100] of this past year, but it is with Bank of America, and because of all the lawsuits [01:43:26.100 --> 01:43:29.100] and all the stuff that was on the front page of all the newspapers and stuff, [01:43:29.100 --> 01:43:34.100] they put everything on hold at least in 23 states. Kentucky was one of them. [01:43:34.100 --> 01:43:41.100] Hold on quickly. My advice is always the same. Sue the crap out of them. Sue them quickly. [01:43:41.100 --> 01:43:46.100] Yeah, and Paul, you can listen to the archives, too. I'm sorry, go ahead, Randy. [01:43:46.100 --> 01:43:52.100] The archives will be loaded up so you can listen to it, but sue, sue quickly. [01:43:52.100 --> 01:43:57.100] Go to RealtorsInRealEstate.com, read How Things Work, and you'll want to sue them. [01:43:57.100 --> 01:43:59.100] This is Randy Caldwell, see you later. [01:44:01.100 --> 01:44:07.100] Randy, stronger immune power, improved sense of well-being. [01:44:07.100 --> 01:44:11.100] How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits? [01:44:11.100 --> 01:44:16.100] The team behind Chintrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises, [01:44:16.100 --> 01:44:20.100] and Chintrition does just that. [01:44:20.100 --> 01:44:24.100] Chintrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine. [01:44:24.100 --> 01:44:30.100] In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component, [01:44:30.100 --> 01:44:37.100] and organic hemp protein and greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base. [01:44:37.100 --> 01:44:41.100] Plus, Chintrition tastes great in just water. [01:44:41.100 --> 01:44:47.100] This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural. [01:44:47.100 --> 01:44:55.100] Visit Chintrition.com to order yours, or call 1-866-497-7436. [01:44:55.100 --> 01:45:00.100] After you use Chintrition, you'll believe in supplements again. [01:45:00.100 --> 01:45:03.100] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:03.100 --> 01:45:09.100] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, [01:45:09.100 --> 01:45:15.100] 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.100 --> 01:45:18.100] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:18.100 --> 01:45:22.100] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:22.100 --> 01:45:27.100] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:27.100 --> 01:45:33.100] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:33.100 --> 01:45:38.100] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:38.100 --> 01:45:42.100] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:42.100 --> 01:45:49.100] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.100 --> 01:45:52.100] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.100 --> 01:46:01.100] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:01.100 --> 01:46:22.100] Hello. Oh, man. In jail. You're broken, man. Oh, man, I'm broken. [01:46:22.100 --> 01:46:38.100] All right, folks, we are back. We are speaking with Paul in Kentucky. [01:46:38.100 --> 01:46:43.100] Paul, I believe, was asking at the end, who does he sue and these sort of things. [01:46:43.100 --> 01:46:45.100] So, Randy, you're just about to answer. [01:46:45.100 --> 01:46:46.100] Okay. [01:46:46.100 --> 01:46:50.100] Okay, who do you sue? This one's easy. [01:46:50.100 --> 01:46:57.100] The only one you want to sue is whoever is doing the foreclosure. [01:46:57.100 --> 01:47:02.100] What you maintain in your suit is an ongoing criminal conspiracy [01:47:02.100 --> 01:47:08.100] engaged in by the real estate agent, by the appraiser, the underwriter, [01:47:08.100 --> 01:47:12.100] the closing agent, the lender, the servicers. [01:47:12.100 --> 01:47:17.100] Everybody involved is engaged in this ongoing criminal conspiracy. [01:47:17.100 --> 01:47:23.100] And it is the guy who came to you and demanded that you make a payment. [01:47:23.100 --> 01:47:28.100] That payment included amounts that were fraudulent that you didn't actually owe. [01:47:28.100 --> 01:47:34.100] And this guy who demanded payment, he intended to take some of your personal property [01:47:34.100 --> 01:47:42.100] and convert it to his own and to these other actors' unjust enrichment. [01:47:42.100 --> 01:47:47.100] So his act is immediate. It was this month or last month. [01:47:47.100 --> 01:47:52.100] What we get when we file a suit is an automatic rule 12 motion to dismiss [01:47:52.100 --> 01:47:55.100] for failure of state of claim in which government can be had. [01:47:55.100 --> 01:48:01.100] And they come in and they say, well, it's exceeded the statute of limitations. [01:48:01.100 --> 01:48:06.100] We don't have vicarious liability for what other people did, [01:48:06.100 --> 01:48:11.100] and we don't have a fiduciary duty to the borrower. [01:48:11.100 --> 01:48:15.100] This gets around all of those issues. [01:48:15.100 --> 01:48:22.100] We sue the servicer, if you're not in foreclosure, or the foreclosing agent, [01:48:22.100 --> 01:48:29.100] for attempting to exact the ultimate harm of the alleged conspiracy [01:48:29.100 --> 01:48:32.100] in which all of these actors participated. [01:48:32.100 --> 01:48:37.100] And when a harm is indivisible, it cannot be divided. [01:48:37.100 --> 01:48:43.100] Therefore, any person who has any involvement in the harm [01:48:43.100 --> 01:48:46.100] can be held responsible for the entire harm. [01:48:46.100 --> 01:48:52.100] So the one you sue is the one doing the foreclosure. [01:48:52.100 --> 01:48:55.100] Did I answer the right question? [01:48:55.100 --> 01:48:59.100] So rule of law radio archives, if I would go on the website and click on that, [01:48:59.100 --> 01:49:03.100] it would give me some examples of what has been done or? [01:49:03.100 --> 01:49:05.100] Well, no, that will give you the archive from tonight's show [01:49:05.100 --> 01:49:08.100] and the archives from all the shows that we've done. [01:49:08.100 --> 01:49:09.100] Okay. [01:49:09.100 --> 01:49:14.100] Go to remediesinrealestate.com. [01:49:14.100 --> 01:49:17.100] Remediesinrealestate.com. [01:49:17.100 --> 01:49:22.100] And fill out, there's a calculate fraud page. [01:49:22.100 --> 01:49:25.100] Get your HUD-1 settlement statement. [01:49:25.100 --> 01:49:30.100] That's two documents, legal size, lines all over it, all the fees charged in closing. [01:49:30.100 --> 01:49:35.100] You want to look at the second page, line 801 to line 1400. [01:49:35.100 --> 01:49:38.100] And fill in all the fees they charged you. [01:49:38.100 --> 01:49:40.100] And then your truth in lending statement, [01:49:40.100 --> 01:49:44.100] which contains the amount the bank says you have to pay. [01:49:44.100 --> 01:49:48.100] And the note, which contains the amount you agreed to pay. [01:49:48.100 --> 01:49:52.100] Put the principal and interest from the truth in lending and the note in [01:49:52.100 --> 01:49:55.100] and the fees they charged you. [01:49:55.100 --> 01:50:01.100] And someone will get back to you, will show you how much fraud you can claim against the lender. [01:50:01.100 --> 01:50:05.100] If you have a $300,000 note on average, [01:50:05.100 --> 01:50:10.100] we'll come up with 1 to 1.2 million claim against the lender. [01:50:10.100 --> 01:50:15.100] The only way you get the lender's attention is to sue it. [01:50:15.100 --> 01:50:18.100] If you try a loan modification, they'll screw you. [01:50:18.100 --> 01:50:22.100] If you try a forbearance, they'll screw you. [01:50:22.100 --> 01:50:24.100] Anything else, they'll just screw you. [01:50:24.100 --> 01:50:27.100] If you sue them, now you got their attention. [01:50:27.100 --> 01:50:32.100] Okay, so calculate fraud page and then the HUD, HUD what was it? [01:50:32.100 --> 01:50:38.100] You need your truth in lending statement, your note, and your HUD one settlement statement. [01:50:38.100 --> 01:50:40.100] One settlement, okay. [01:50:40.100 --> 01:50:41.100] Well, thank you. [01:50:41.100 --> 01:50:42.100] I know you've got other calls, [01:50:42.100 --> 01:50:45.100] and I'll try to learn all I can from listening to the other archives. [01:50:45.100 --> 01:50:46.100] All right, thanks. [01:50:46.100 --> 01:50:47.100] Thank you. [01:50:47.100 --> 01:50:48.100] Thank you very much. [01:50:48.100 --> 01:50:52.100] Okay, we're going now to John in Illinois. [01:50:52.100 --> 01:50:54.100] John, thank you for calling in. [01:50:54.100 --> 01:50:57.100] What is your question for us tonight? [01:50:57.100 --> 01:50:59.100] Hello, how are you? [01:50:59.100 --> 01:51:00.100] Pretty good. [01:51:00.100 --> 01:51:02.100] What is your question for us tonight? [01:51:02.100 --> 01:51:03.100] Great. [01:51:03.100 --> 01:51:07.100] I had a question about a DUI answer. [01:51:07.100 --> 01:51:08.100] Okay, go ahead. [01:51:08.100 --> 01:51:09.100] We're running out of time. [01:51:09.100 --> 01:51:11.100] We're almost at the end of the show. [01:51:11.100 --> 01:51:13.100] All right, question for Andy. [01:51:13.100 --> 01:51:22.100] Anyway, I had a DUI and the things are that I was in a bar obviously. [01:51:22.100 --> 01:51:23.100] Yes, I was drunk. [01:51:23.100 --> 01:51:30.100] I just got done with finishing out a project, and I was not driving a vehicle. [01:51:30.100 --> 01:51:35.100] A girl that I didn't even know in the bar was going to give me a ride home. [01:51:35.100 --> 01:51:38.100] I didn't know the vehicle or anything like that. [01:51:38.100 --> 01:51:41.100] She brought me to the vehicle. [01:51:41.100 --> 01:51:43.100] It was in the snow. [01:51:43.100 --> 01:51:44.100] It got caught in a ditch. [01:51:44.100 --> 01:51:49.100] She ran off the truck, and I got caught with a DUI. [01:51:49.100 --> 01:51:50.100] Wait a minute. [01:51:50.100 --> 01:51:54.100] You weren't driving the vehicle? [01:51:54.100 --> 01:51:57.100] The vehicle didn't even belong to me. [01:51:57.100 --> 01:51:58.100] No, no. [01:51:58.100 --> 01:52:02.100] Were you in the driver's seat when the police showed up? [01:52:02.100 --> 01:52:04.100] Yes, I was. [01:52:04.100 --> 01:52:11.100] Did the ignition turn on with the keys in the ignition? [01:52:11.100 --> 01:52:13.100] The keys were in the ignition. [01:52:13.100 --> 01:52:15.100] I don't know even though it was running. [01:52:15.100 --> 01:52:17.100] I was passed out. [01:52:17.100 --> 01:52:19.100] The car was in a ravine. [01:52:19.100 --> 01:52:21.100] It was stuck. [01:52:21.100 --> 01:52:22.100] She left. [01:52:22.100 --> 01:52:23.100] She ran away. [01:52:23.100 --> 01:52:27.100] Here's a problem that you have. [01:52:27.100 --> 01:52:30.100] You were in the seat with the keys in the ignition. [01:52:30.100 --> 01:52:35.100] It's a reasonable probable cause to believe that you were operating the vehicle. [01:52:35.100 --> 01:52:38.100] It's so crumped that you passed out. [01:52:38.100 --> 01:52:42.100] I mean, the vehicle didn't belong to me, and I wasn't driving it. [01:52:42.100 --> 01:52:43.100] Wait, hold on, John. [01:52:43.100 --> 01:52:45.100] John, Randy's trying to tell you something. [01:52:45.100 --> 01:52:46.100] Hold on. [01:52:46.100 --> 01:52:47.100] Go ahead, Randy. [01:52:47.100 --> 01:52:48.100] Will you please repeat that? [01:52:48.100 --> 01:52:51.100] John was talking, and nobody could understand what anybody was saying. [01:52:51.100 --> 01:52:52.100] Go ahead, Randy. [01:52:52.100 --> 01:52:56.100] You were sitting in the driver's seat. [01:52:56.100 --> 01:52:59.100] The key was in the ignition. [01:52:59.100 --> 01:53:01.100] You were passed out. [01:53:01.100 --> 01:53:07.100] Reasonable probable cause to believe you were operating the vehicle. [01:53:07.100 --> 01:53:10.100] Not a problem. [01:53:10.100 --> 01:53:16.100] And that's why I'm paying the penalty because I didn't even do anything, [01:53:16.100 --> 01:53:20.100] but I'm taking up for her. [01:53:20.100 --> 01:53:22.100] It doesn't matter. [01:53:22.100 --> 01:53:23.100] Okay, you have to... [01:53:23.100 --> 01:53:26.100] Okay, look at it from the policeman's side. [01:53:26.100 --> 01:53:31.100] He finds somebody stuck in the snow. [01:53:31.100 --> 01:53:34.100] You're sitting in the driver's seat of a car. [01:53:34.100 --> 01:53:36.100] Key's in the ignition. [01:53:36.100 --> 01:53:41.100] So drunk, his pass moved out. [01:53:41.100 --> 01:53:47.100] Would you want this person getting that car unstuck and driving it home? [01:53:47.100 --> 01:53:52.100] John, unable to be driven is not drivable. [01:53:52.100 --> 01:53:57.100] Okay, what that amounts to is reasonable probable cause. [01:53:57.100 --> 01:54:00.100] The policeman has reasonable probable cause. [01:54:00.100 --> 01:54:03.100] You won't get around that one. [01:54:03.100 --> 01:54:06.100] No, I didn't think so. [01:54:06.100 --> 01:54:07.100] That one's GG. [01:54:07.100 --> 01:54:10.100] You've got to find... [01:54:10.100 --> 01:54:14.100] We're not happy with the police, but I'll be frank with you. [01:54:14.100 --> 01:54:20.100] I don't have much patience with drunk drivers. [01:54:20.100 --> 01:54:26.100] I've seen the results, but if you weren't driving now, [01:54:26.100 --> 01:54:34.100] we have to get past the point, the issue of probable cause. [01:54:34.100 --> 01:54:36.100] They have probable cause to believe. [01:54:36.100 --> 01:54:42.100] You have to be able to tell if the car was running or not. [01:54:42.100 --> 01:54:47.100] Okay, so the question comes, how'd you get in the driver's seat? [01:54:47.100 --> 01:54:51.100] I probably stumbled in there and she probably left everything behind [01:54:51.100 --> 01:54:54.100] because she ran out to try to go get somebody for some help to come in there, [01:54:54.100 --> 01:54:56.100] and I just tried to stay warm. [01:54:56.100 --> 01:54:57.100] What's the problem? [01:54:57.100 --> 01:54:58.100] They don't know her anyway. [01:54:58.100 --> 01:55:02.100] Okay, I know everybody's going to get upset about this, [01:55:02.100 --> 01:55:08.100] and the one thing I hate most is the problem in this country with the legal system. [01:55:08.100 --> 01:55:09.100] John, John, wait a minute. [01:55:09.100 --> 01:55:11.100] Randy's trying to talk. [01:55:11.100 --> 01:55:14.100] Randy, please start again. [01:55:14.100 --> 01:55:16.100] Okay, I guess I'm not coming up over him. [01:55:16.100 --> 01:55:18.100] Yeah, you're coming up over him. [01:55:18.100 --> 01:55:20.100] John's just not hearing you for some reason. [01:55:20.100 --> 01:55:21.100] I'm monitoring all the levels. [01:55:21.100 --> 01:55:24.100] Go ahead, Randy. [01:55:24.100 --> 01:55:31.100] In this country, there is a big problem with prosecutors forcing people to take a deal [01:55:31.100 --> 01:55:35.100] that has turned this country into a police state. [01:55:35.100 --> 01:55:44.100] We house more of our citizens per capita than any other country in the world, [01:55:44.100 --> 01:55:47.100] and it's because of the deal. [01:55:47.100 --> 01:55:54.100] With that said, take a deal if you can get one. [01:55:54.100 --> 01:55:57.100] They're going to put you in front of a jury, and they're going to say, [01:55:57.100 --> 01:56:01.100] I found this guy stuck in the snow, sitting in the driver's seat with the key on, [01:56:01.100 --> 01:56:09.100] so drunk he passed out, and the jury will crucify you. [01:56:09.100 --> 01:56:13.100] Next time I'd fall asleep in the passenger seat. [01:56:13.100 --> 01:56:16.100] Yeah, make sure your father's sleeping in the passenger seat. [01:56:16.100 --> 01:56:20.100] And if you can't tell them how you got in the driver's seat, [01:56:20.100 --> 01:56:29.100] you're going to have a mother or a grandmother on a jury, and they are going to be livid. [01:56:29.100 --> 01:56:35.100] So I suggest if you can take a deal, take a deal. [01:56:35.100 --> 01:56:41.100] Well, bottom line here is that I sucked it up. [01:56:41.100 --> 01:56:43.100] Get closer to your mic. [01:56:43.100 --> 01:56:45.100] I'm having a real hard time hearing you. [01:56:45.100 --> 01:56:47.100] Pardon? [01:56:47.100 --> 01:56:48.100] I can't hear you. [01:56:48.100 --> 01:56:49.100] Get closer to your mic. [01:56:49.100 --> 01:56:51.100] I'm having trouble hearing you. [01:56:51.100 --> 01:56:53.100] Oh, I'm sorry. [01:56:53.100 --> 01:56:56.100] What I was saying is bottom line is I already sucked it up. [01:56:56.100 --> 01:56:58.100] I'm already dealing with my sentence. [01:56:58.100 --> 01:57:00.100] I'm already dealing with it. [01:57:00.100 --> 01:57:06.100] There's something that I didn't do, but I got accused of it because I know they say, you know, [01:57:06.100 --> 01:57:11.100] John, I can't understand anything you're saying. [01:57:11.100 --> 01:57:12.100] I understand. [01:57:12.100 --> 01:57:14.100] Okay, you're fading in and out. [01:57:14.100 --> 01:57:15.100] I can't hear you. [01:57:15.100 --> 01:57:16.100] We're running out of time. [01:57:16.100 --> 01:57:18.100] We really need to move along. [01:57:18.100 --> 01:57:19.100] I hate to cut you off. [01:57:19.100 --> 01:57:22.100] We apparently have a really bad connection. [01:57:22.100 --> 01:57:25.100] Yeah, I think we've got a bad connection with John because I'm all over the levels, [01:57:25.100 --> 01:57:31.100] and I can't send the audio to the phone bridge any louder or it will blow up my equipment. [01:57:31.100 --> 01:57:32.100] Okay, so. [01:57:32.100 --> 01:57:34.100] Okay, we've only got a couple of minutes left. [01:57:34.100 --> 01:57:36.100] We really need to move on, John. [01:57:36.100 --> 01:57:37.100] I'm sorry. [01:57:37.100 --> 01:57:39.100] We're going to go to Joe and try to get Joe. [01:57:39.100 --> 01:57:42.100] I'm sorry, Kathy, Ray, James, Valerie. [01:57:42.100 --> 01:57:46.100] We're just going to run out of time here. [01:57:46.100 --> 01:57:50.100] Okay, Joe, what's on your mind tonight? [01:57:50.100 --> 01:57:51.100] Quick question, Randy. [01:57:51.100 --> 01:57:52.100] I have three questions. [01:57:52.100 --> 01:57:57.100] I used to sell foreclosures back in the early 90s, and I sold one house to my daughter. [01:57:57.100 --> 01:58:02.100] Can she look into whether her prompter note has been transferred? [01:58:02.100 --> 01:58:06.100] And the other question is I have a friend who's been making payments, [01:58:06.100 --> 01:58:09.100] you know, as far as making payments monthly, [01:58:09.100 --> 01:58:13.100] but her prompter note was transferred to Bank of America. [01:58:13.100 --> 01:58:16.100] Can they look into that as well? [01:58:16.100 --> 01:58:18.100] Yeah, go to Remedies and Real Estate. [01:58:18.100 --> 01:58:19.100] We'll have somebody contact you. [01:58:19.100 --> 01:58:23.100] If this is the Bank of America, they've probably sold it 30 or 40 times, [01:58:23.100 --> 01:58:26.100] and Bank of America is getting really beat up. [01:58:26.100 --> 01:58:31.100] Right now is a really good time to sue because the banks are getting clobbered. [01:58:31.100 --> 01:58:34.100] They're reaching a point where they're going to start making deals. [01:58:34.100 --> 01:58:35.100] I am sorry. [01:58:35.100 --> 01:58:36.100] We are out of time. [01:58:36.100 --> 01:58:37.100] Thank you. [01:58:37.100 --> 01:58:41.100] This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, Wheel of Law Radio. [01:58:41.100 --> 01:58:45.100] I apologize, but we'll have to put in an archive tomorrow night [01:58:45.100 --> 01:58:48.100] because I'm going to be traveling and Deborah's going to be tied up. [01:58:48.100 --> 01:58:50.100] But we'll be back Monday. [01:58:50.100 --> 01:58:52.100] Deborah and Eddie will be back Monday. [01:58:52.100 --> 01:58:55.100] And I'll be back with you Thursday and next Friday. [01:58:55.100 --> 01:58:59.100] Wheel of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig. [01:58:59.100 --> 01:59:01.100] I'm like a stepping craze. [01:59:01.100 --> 01:59:03.100] I don't want my size. [01:59:03.100 --> 01:59:06.100] I'm dangerous, dangerous. [01:59:06.100 --> 01:59:08.100] I'm like a stepping craze. [01:59:08.100 --> 01:59:10.100] I don't want my size. [01:59:10.100 --> 01:59:14.100] I'm dangerous, dangerous. [01:59:14.100 --> 01:59:21.100] If you are a Chucky, somebody Chucky from me. [01:59:21.100 --> 01:59:29.100] If you are a Chucky, Chucky, somebody Chucky from me. [01:59:29.100 --> 01:59:31.100] I'm like a stepping craze. [01:59:31.100 --> 01:59:33.100] I don't want my size. [01:59:33.100 --> 01:59:37.100] I'm dangerous, dangerous. [01:59:37.100 --> 01:59:39.100] I'm like a stepping craze. [01:59:39.100 --> 01:59:41.100] I don't want my size. [01:59:41.100 --> 01:59:44.100] I'm dangerous, dangerous. [01:59:44.100 --> 01:59:53.100] I'm dangerous, dangerous.