[00:00.000 --> 00:10.600]  17 people were killed Friday in southern Afghanistan after a bomber set off explosives at a public
[00:10.600 --> 00:14.400]  bath in spinn-baldak near the Pakistan border.
[00:14.400 --> 00:19.400]  The number of civilians killed or wounded in the Afghan war increased by 20% during
[00:19.400 --> 00:23.280]  the first 10 months of 2010 compared with the year before.
[00:23.280 --> 00:28.400]  The Afghan Interior Ministry said 2010 was the deadliest year for civilians since the
[00:28.400 --> 00:30.840]  2001 U.S. invasion.
[00:30.840 --> 00:36.960]  A woman who believes Barack Obama wasn't born in the U.S. interrupted the House of Representatives
[00:36.960 --> 00:37.960]  Thursday.
[00:37.960 --> 00:42.440]  The public gallery outburst came during a reading of the section in the Constitution
[00:42.440 --> 00:45.960]  requiring that presidents be naturally born U.S. citizens.
[00:45.960 --> 00:51.240]  Berthers claim Obama wasn't born in the U.S. despite publication of his birth certificate
[00:51.240 --> 00:54.600]  showing he was born in Hawaii.
[00:54.600 --> 01:00.680]  Wiki leaked diplomatic cables revealed Thursday U.S. firms complained of Israeli corruption
[01:00.680 --> 01:02.920]  at Gaza's main border crossing.
[01:02.920 --> 01:09.560]  According to 2006 cables, U.S. firms including Motorola, Caterpillar and Philip Morris complained
[01:09.560 --> 01:14.240]  to embassy officials about widespread corruption at Kani Crossing.
[01:14.240 --> 01:21.200]  Coca-Cola's Joe Urgh Hartman said he was asked to pay $3,000 per truckload.
[01:21.200 --> 01:26.200]  Afghan President Hamid Karzai has ordered the Interior Ministry to intensify efforts to
[01:26.200 --> 01:29.640]  shut down domestic and foreign private security firms.
[01:29.640 --> 01:35.120]  Karzai issued the order one day after rejecting U.S. calls to nearly double private security
[01:35.120 --> 01:37.000]  firms in Afghanistan.
[01:37.000 --> 01:42.120]  Karzai had earlier accused foreign security contractors of operating as militias.
[01:42.120 --> 01:46.360]  Some have been accused of killing civilians without facing punishment.
[01:46.360 --> 01:52.920]  Bubble has confirmed the presence of 52 foreign private security companies including Zee Services,
[01:52.920 --> 01:54.720]  formerly known as Blackwater.
[01:54.720 --> 01:59.800]  Most security contractors are believed to have close ties to Afghan warlords and are
[01:59.800 --> 02:05.280]  accused of contributing to the rising number of civilian casualties.
[02:05.280 --> 02:09.680]  The Justice Department announced Thursday the indictment of Jeffrey Sterling, a former
[02:09.680 --> 02:14.440]  CIA officer, accused of disclosing classified information to a reporter.
[02:14.440 --> 02:19.600]  In the latest example of a crackdown by the Obama administration on leaking to journalists,
[02:19.600 --> 02:24.520]  Sterling was indicted on charges he disclosed restricted information to a journalist about
[02:24.520 --> 02:31.680]  a clandestine program intended to impede the progress of unnamed countries' weapons capabilities.
[02:31.680 --> 02:35.840]  Prosecutors believe Sterling was talking to Times reporter James Risen.
[02:35.840 --> 02:41.120]  Risen wrote about a CIA attempt to disrupt Iranian nuclear research in his book State
[02:41.120 --> 02:45.160]  of War, The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration.
[02:45.160 --> 02:50.920]  The indictment says Risen worked on an article about the program in 2003, but the paper decided
[02:50.920 --> 02:56.280]  not to publish it after government officials told editors disclosure would jeopardize national
[02:56.280 --> 02:57.280]  security.
[02:57.280 --> 03:13.880]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:13.880 --> 03:28.680]  talk radio at its best.
[03:28.680 --> 03:47.280]  I received my remedy today, came in a box, just like they say, I accepted for value right
[03:47.280 --> 03:57.800]  away, not sooner, not later, we are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every
[03:57.800 --> 04:07.840]  day, and I can take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use, but I was good
[04:07.840 --> 04:21.640]  for the gander, going to work for the goose, I know some architects, I know some engineers,
[04:21.640 --> 04:31.400]  they see me every day, they know something seems queer, what's up with the blatant deception,
[04:31.400 --> 04:39.160]  what is the nature of what you might gain, I see something headed straight for you, I
[04:39.160 --> 04:47.960]  think it looks just like a train, it smells like a sham of thunder, I can see them playing
[04:47.960 --> 04:54.640]  fast and loose, what I was good for the gander, going to work for the goose.
[04:54.640 --> 05:01.840]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Debra Sears, Debra Craig, we're back, Troy, do you have one more question
[05:01.840 --> 05:02.840]  or comment?
[05:02.840 --> 05:10.000]  Yeah, in regards to, and I don't know what federal rule, if it's a killer rule or not,
[05:10.000 --> 05:18.240]  but one reason I'm kind of getting anxious here, we signed that RFI back in April of
[05:18.240 --> 05:24.920]  2008 and there's either like a rule of rescission, like for three years, you've got a three year
[05:24.920 --> 05:25.920]  period.
[05:25.920 --> 05:33.960]  Okay, you have three years under RESPA, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, one year
[05:33.960 --> 05:36.160]  under Truth in Lending Act.
[05:36.160 --> 05:37.520]  Okay.
[05:37.520 --> 05:38.520]  Are you in foreclosure?
[05:38.520 --> 05:41.200]  No, we are current.
[05:41.200 --> 05:55.240]  Okay, if you are in foreclosure and you can show more than $35 unreported renumeration
[05:55.240 --> 06:03.120]  to the loan originator in the form of loan registration fee, then the right to rescission
[06:03.120 --> 06:14.800]  can be renewed, or if you can show that you exercised due diligence in an effort to determine
[06:14.800 --> 06:24.440]  the fraud, to detect the violations of Hopatita RESPA, the Home Equity Protections Act, Truth
[06:24.440 --> 06:35.640]  in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and you can show fraud by non-disclosure,
[06:35.640 --> 06:43.640]  then the statute of limitation holds until you discover the violations.
[06:43.640 --> 06:50.320]  And we've rewritten the pleadings that we do based on the responses we've got from the
[06:50.320 --> 06:58.280]  courts, and this is what the courts keep saying, in order to toll the statute of limitations
[06:58.280 --> 07:04.200]  on Hopatita RESPA, you have to show that you exercised due diligence in trying to locate
[07:04.200 --> 07:15.160]  the fraud, and the fraud was hidden from you through fraudulent concealment.
[07:15.160 --> 07:17.360]  That's the terms the court keeps using.
[07:17.360 --> 07:24.960]  Well, this totally was, and I mean, being kind of a newbie to it, we took home our docs
[07:24.960 --> 07:33.040]  that were given to us on the day of closing, and of course, being a greenhorn, half of
[07:33.040 --> 07:38.040]  them weren't even signed, and then when I go to get copies of the signed ones, everything's
[07:38.040 --> 07:39.040]  totally different.
[07:39.040 --> 07:41.680]  Oh, that is wonderful.
[07:41.680 --> 07:46.920]  This is exactly the reason they all should have been signed.
[07:46.920 --> 07:47.920]  Yeah.
[07:47.920 --> 07:52.400]  And the very reason the lender did not want them signed.
[07:52.400 --> 07:53.400]  Correct.
[07:53.400 --> 08:01.760]  So that he could change them at will, and in the end, the law doesn't matter.
[08:01.760 --> 08:03.760]  In the end, everything's political.
[08:03.760 --> 08:04.760]  Yeah.
[08:04.760 --> 08:05.760]  However...
[08:05.760 --> 08:09.800]  What are you looking at as far as the time frame on that litigation engine, where a guy
[08:09.800 --> 08:10.800]  can...
[08:10.800 --> 08:11.800]  Oh, I haven't...
[08:11.800 --> 08:12.800] ...come running away on this?
[08:12.800 --> 08:13.800]  Oh, we have it working.
[08:13.800 --> 08:14.800]  Okay.
[08:14.800 --> 08:16.560]  We're just steadily improving it.
[08:16.560 --> 08:18.920]  And I'm about to do a major upgrade.
[08:18.920 --> 08:26.960]  The documents that the engine will produce, we're producing by hand now, and the reason
[08:26.960 --> 08:31.240]  we're doing that is nothing ever works the way you expect it to.
[08:31.240 --> 08:32.240]  No.
[08:32.240 --> 08:34.560]  I'm an engineer, and I understand these things.
[08:34.560 --> 08:41.480]  You can figure it all out, but when you actually do it, you always miss stuff.
[08:41.480 --> 08:49.560]  As an engineer, a good engineer realizes that the engineer does not design and develop anything.
[08:49.560 --> 08:59.320]  What the engineer does is allows the product or the... whatever you're trying to develop,
[08:59.320 --> 09:02.400]  you allow it to develop itself, and that's what we're doing.
[09:02.400 --> 09:03.920]  That's why we're doing this by hand.
[09:03.920 --> 09:04.920]  Okay.
[09:04.920 --> 09:08.720]  There's a lot of complex issues.
[09:08.720 --> 09:15.600]  And as we put them together, we're looking for those patterns, those things that keep
[09:15.600 --> 09:16.600]  coming up.
[09:16.600 --> 09:24.560]  I just spoke to someone recently about artificial intelligence, and he was talking about some
[09:24.560 --> 09:32.560]  studies they did with the most complex profession in the world, and it's supposed to be some
[09:32.560 --> 09:37.480]  sort of doctor who studies a certain kind of blood.
[09:37.480 --> 09:46.920]  And they got all of the known professionals in this area and put together all of the issues
[09:46.920 --> 09:54.360]  they dealt with, and it turned out that they could develop all the information they needed
[09:54.360 --> 09:58.000]  with 12 questions.
[09:58.000 --> 10:02.760]  And the professionals looked at that, and they were astounded.
[10:02.760 --> 10:04.680]  They agreed with it, but they were astounded.
[10:04.680 --> 10:07.120]  They never considered it could be that simple.
[10:07.120 --> 10:09.280]  That's precisely what we're doing here.
[10:09.280 --> 10:10.280]  Okay.
[10:10.280 --> 10:18.120]  We're sorting out the issues that don't matter from the issues that do matter, and each time
[10:18.120 --> 10:24.840]  as we get each minor little... minor issues, each individual issue sorted out, we add that
[10:24.840 --> 10:25.840]  to the engine.
[10:25.840 --> 10:26.840]  All right.
[10:26.840 --> 10:31.880]  And then we add another one and another one, so it's working now.
[10:31.880 --> 10:35.960]  It's a little bit slower because we have to do it all by hand, but with each addition
[10:35.960 --> 10:38.400]  we make, it speeds up, and it gets more efficient.
[10:38.400 --> 10:39.400]  Okay.
[10:39.400 --> 10:42.720]  So our turnaround is really pretty fast right now.
[10:42.720 --> 10:43.720]  If we can...
[10:43.720 --> 10:44.720]  All right.
[10:44.720 --> 10:47.520]  I'll flip you off an email here, and then we'll take it from there.
[10:47.520 --> 10:52.400]  I thank you guys, and as always, an awesome show, so thank you much.
[10:52.400 --> 10:53.400]  Thank you.
[10:53.400 --> 10:54.400]  God bless.
[10:54.400 --> 10:55.400]  Bye.
[10:55.400 --> 10:56.400]  Okay.
[10:56.400 --> 10:58.400]  Now we're going to go to JD from Texas.
[10:58.400 --> 10:59.400]  Yeah.
[10:59.400 --> 11:00.400]  Hello there.
[11:00.400 --> 11:01.400]  Howdy, JD.
[11:01.400 --> 11:02.400]  How's it going?
[11:02.400 --> 11:09.080]  How's it going, JD, and Randy, I've got a question for you.
[11:09.080 --> 11:10.080]  Okay.
[11:10.080 --> 11:20.560]  My son bought a house, oh, it's been several years ago, and all of a sudden his insurance
[11:20.560 --> 11:29.600]  carrier that had the insurance for his house notified him that he no longer has a house
[11:29.600 --> 11:37.840]  worth $60,000, he's got a house worth $150,000, and they're charging him insurance accordingly.
[11:37.840 --> 11:39.080]  Whoa.
[11:39.080 --> 11:41.120]  How did they get that?
[11:41.120 --> 11:43.240]  That's what I was trying to get him to tell me.
[11:43.240 --> 11:44.240]  Okay.
[11:44.240 --> 11:45.240]  He doesn't know.
[11:45.240 --> 11:48.240]  And I said, boy, this sounds like fraud of some sort.
[11:48.240 --> 11:52.360]  This is exactly the kind of stuff we're looking for.
[11:52.360 --> 11:54.040]  I've never heard of this before.
[11:54.040 --> 12:01.920]  Well, I called him tonight, well, I talked to his wife, and I asked her, I said, do you
[12:01.920 --> 12:05.200]  have this thing written down?
[12:05.200 --> 12:08.120]  Do you have it documented in some way?
[12:08.120 --> 12:10.320]  And she said, well, they sent us some paperwork.
[12:10.320 --> 12:15.320]  And I said, well, hold on to it, because we're going to need it.
[12:15.320 --> 12:16.320]  Okay.
[12:16.320 --> 12:22.800]  This sounds like there are a number of routines they pull to try to force you into foreclosure.
[12:22.800 --> 12:26.040]  Has he been slow pay at all?
[12:26.040 --> 12:27.040]  No.
[12:27.040 --> 12:28.480]  He's up to date.
[12:28.480 --> 12:29.480]  He's up to date.
[12:29.480 --> 12:34.400]  And there are several things you need to watch for.
[12:34.400 --> 12:39.920]  There are some tricks and traps the lender pulls, but generally they don't start pulling
[12:39.920 --> 12:43.520]  these until you miss a payment.
[12:43.520 --> 12:44.520]  Okay.
[12:44.520 --> 12:45.520]  Yeah.
[12:45.520 --> 12:52.760]  Even if you send the payment in and somehow the bank screws up or the lender screws up
[12:52.760 --> 12:57.440]  and doesn't get it applied in time, and it shows up as a slow pay, even if it's their
[12:57.440 --> 13:01.880]  fault, they say, oh goody, we've got a slow pay.
[13:01.880 --> 13:02.880]  Yeah.
[13:02.880 --> 13:10.920]  And then what they do is they don't charge you enough in escrow to pay the taxes.
[13:10.920 --> 13:11.920]  One of their favorite tricks.
[13:11.920 --> 13:14.680]  Well, this isn't tax, but it's a-
[13:14.680 --> 13:18.720]  No, this is something new.
[13:18.720 --> 13:21.440]  I haven't heard of this one before.
[13:21.440 --> 13:27.080]  Where the insurance company decides that the building is worth three times what it originally
[13:27.080 --> 13:37.560]  was and in a market where properties are dropping dramatically, it sounds like the insurance
[13:37.560 --> 13:43.160]  company may be hurting for funds and they're trying to squeeze more money out of their
[13:43.160 --> 13:44.160]  customers.
[13:44.160 --> 13:52.800]  Well, they sort of made a statement to that effect like, oh, we got hurt real bad at Katrina
[13:52.800 --> 13:55.800]  and that.
[13:55.800 --> 13:59.800]  So we want to get more money from you to make up for it.
[13:59.800 --> 14:00.800]  Yeah.
[14:00.800 --> 14:02.800]  That sounds like insurance fraud.
[14:02.800 --> 14:09.440]  Well, that last caller I think was, you said the lender is the only one that can reappraise
[14:09.440 --> 14:10.440]  your house?
[14:10.440 --> 14:13.960]  Well, that's what the lenders have got together and decided.
[14:13.960 --> 14:16.920]  It's actually not true.
[14:16.920 --> 14:22.200]  The lender will only pay direct attention to the appraiser they hire.
[14:22.200 --> 14:23.400]  I see.
[14:23.400 --> 14:32.120]  However, you can still hire a private appraiser to do an appraisal on your home, but he can't
[14:32.120 --> 14:34.880]  give that to the lender.
[14:34.880 --> 14:41.720]  He can give it to you and that's what we call best evidence.
[14:41.720 --> 14:45.040]  Well he needs to have his house reappraised.
[14:45.040 --> 14:46.240]  Absolutely.
[14:46.240 --> 14:53.000]  He needs to have a professional appraiser, cost him a couple hundred bucks and get a
[14:53.000 --> 14:58.880]  professional appraiser that make it clear to the appraiser that you'll have no other
[14:58.880 --> 15:02.600]  business with him other than to appraise this property.
[15:02.600 --> 15:03.600]  Okay.
[15:03.600 --> 15:11.960]  So he comes in with clean hands, no influence, no pressure, give you a proper appraisal.
[15:11.960 --> 15:12.960]  Okay.
[15:12.960 --> 15:21.440]  And you bring that before the court along with an appraisal from an appraiser hired
[15:21.440 --> 15:30.920]  by the lender and the court and the jury has to decide which one they want to pay attention
[15:30.920 --> 15:31.920]  to.
[15:31.920 --> 15:35.880]  And does the appraisal cost a couple hundred dollars?
[15:35.880 --> 15:39.840]  Yeah, generally $2,250 is pretty common.
[15:39.840 --> 15:40.840]  On the Hudman Settlement Statements.
[15:40.840 --> 15:42.840]  It's still like a racket to me.
[15:42.840 --> 15:45.840]  Well actually it's quite a bit of work.
[15:45.840 --> 15:52.880]  When you see a proper appraisal, when I get proper appraisals they're about an inch thick
[15:52.880 --> 15:54.680]  in documentation.
[15:54.680 --> 16:01.040]  They come out and photograph the property, they photograph all the rooms, they look at
[16:01.040 --> 16:09.280]  properties in the neighborhood to try to find properties that are similar in size and in
[16:09.280 --> 16:13.480]  parameters to see what those properties go for.
[16:13.480 --> 16:16.480]  He's out in the boondocks.
[16:16.480 --> 16:24.520]  They in a $150,000 home in a 10 mile square area.
[16:24.520 --> 16:33.440]  They will look at the houses around, but generally what appraisers charge is really a pretty
[16:33.440 --> 16:36.000]  valuable and reasonable amount.
[16:36.000 --> 16:46.400]  When they get $354,500 that's the lender attaching extra amounts on it above what the appraisers
[16:46.400 --> 16:47.400]  charge.
[16:47.400 --> 16:48.400]  Could I hold on?
[16:48.400 --> 16:50.720]  I've got one more thing I want to ask.
[16:50.720 --> 16:51.720]  Absolutely.
[16:51.720 --> 16:52.720]  We need to move quickly.
[16:52.720 --> 16:57.320]  A lot of callers, but we'll take your last issue on the other side.
[16:57.320 --> 17:02.240]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig will be right.
[17:02.240 --> 17:07.280]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies
[17:07.280 --> 17:09.280]  in the Austin metro area.
[17:09.280 --> 17:11.320]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:11.320 --> 17:15.360]  We are a family owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:15.360 --> 17:16.360]  and metals purchases.
[17:16.360 --> 17:22.360]  We buy, sell, trade and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections, precious
[17:22.360 --> 17:23.960]  metals and scrap gold.
[17:23.960 --> 17:27.560]  We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well.
[17:27.560 --> 17:30.160]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion.
[17:30.160 --> 17:36.240]  We're located at 5448 Barnett Road, Suite 3 and we're open Monday through Friday, 10
[17:36.240 --> 17:40.120]  a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[17:40.120 --> 17:47.520]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440
[17:47.520 --> 17:48.520]  with any questions.
[17:48.520 --> 17:54.120]  As for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM, that's Capital
[17:54.120 --> 18:00.560]  Coin and Bullion 512-646-6440.
[18:00.560 --> 18:05.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.880 --> 18:09.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.680]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.680 --> 18:14.680]  can win too.
[18:14.680 --> 18:19.480]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.480 --> 18:25.320]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.320 --> 18:29.880]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:29.880 --> 18:34.080]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.080 --> 18:39.200]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.200 --> 18:41.320]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.320 --> 18:46.880]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.880 --> 18:49.880]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 18:58.880]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.880 --> 18:59.880]  collectors now.
[18:59.880 --> 19:00.880]  Well, don't let nothing get to you.
[19:00.880 --> 19:01.880]  Only the father can deliver you.
[19:01.880 --> 19:11.880]  So don't let bad-minded people hurt you until they say something, get behind them.
[19:11.880 --> 19:20.880]  Know what I mean, my friend, and all the jacks you'll be.
[19:20.880 --> 19:35.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin,
[19:35.880 --> 19:40.880]  trust in God, my friend.
[19:40.880 --> 19:49.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[19:49.880 --> 19:52.880]  Trust in God, my friend.
[19:52.880 --> 20:17.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[20:17.880 --> 20:44.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[20:44.880 --> 20:48.880]  Trust in God, my friend.
[20:48.880 --> 21:00.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[21:00.880 --> 21:28.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[21:28.880 --> 21:43.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[21:43.880 --> 22:07.880]  Tell Him your problems end, call on His name once again, He will tell you no more sin.
[22:07.880 --> 22:24.880]  So trust in God, my friend.
[22:37.880 --> 22:40.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[22:40.880 --> 22:41.880]  Sorry for the extended break.
[22:41.880 --> 22:43.880]  We had a little bit of a technical difficulty.
[22:43.880 --> 22:47.880]  Our call screener got snowed out and his internet dropped.
[22:47.880 --> 22:53.880]  Randy, you were in the middle of answering a question for this gentleman.
[22:53.880 --> 22:55.880]  No, I think I answered the question.
[22:55.880 --> 22:57.880]  We had one more issue.
[22:57.880 --> 23:10.880]  Oh, okay.
[23:10.880 --> 23:12.880]  Hello, anybody there?
[23:12.880 --> 23:13.880]  Yeah, we're here.
[23:13.880 --> 23:14.880]  Go ahead.
[23:14.880 --> 23:19.880]  Remedies and realestate.com, is that the one I need to give my son?
[23:19.880 --> 23:21.880]  Yes, it is.
[23:21.880 --> 23:28.880]  Okay, then he needs to go to court and a jury, and after he wins his case,
[23:28.880 --> 23:36.880]  then he can file for remedies, in other words reimbursement of all this money he's out.
[23:36.880 --> 23:42.880]  Well, okay, what we will help him do, we will evaluate the fraud in the note
[23:42.880 --> 23:44.880]  and help him file suit against the lender.
[23:44.880 --> 23:45.880]  Okay.
[23:45.880 --> 23:50.880]  Okay, is he up to date on his payments?
[23:50.880 --> 23:51.880]  Yeah, he's there.
[23:51.880 --> 23:52.880]  When he sues them?
[23:52.880 --> 23:53.880]  Yeah.
[23:53.880 --> 23:59.880]  They're going to come right back and make him an offer for a modification
[23:59.880 --> 24:05.880]  because it's going to cost them a lot of money to fight this suit.
[24:05.880 --> 24:06.880]  Okay.
[24:06.880 --> 24:10.880]  And they'll come back and cut, since they have no claim,
[24:10.880 --> 24:13.880]  if he was in foreclosure, it'd be different.
[24:13.880 --> 24:14.880]  Okay.
[24:14.880 --> 24:16.880]  But if he's not in foreclosure, you know,
[24:16.880 --> 24:20.880]  we're looking at 300 or 400 bucks an hour for attorneys to write answers
[24:20.880 --> 24:23.880]  to a very extensive lawsuit we'll file.
[24:23.880 --> 24:24.880]  Yeah.
[24:24.880 --> 24:32.880]  Well, the other thing I had, are you familiar with the film?
[24:32.880 --> 24:39.880]  I've got it in VHS, but it's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
[24:39.880 --> 24:40.880]  CAFRA.
[24:40.880 --> 24:43.880]  Oh, yeah, we're very familiar with those.
[24:43.880 --> 24:44.880]  Okay.
[24:44.880 --> 24:51.880]  If he was, if he wasn't, you can get the tape from Alex Jones
[24:51.880 --> 24:53.880]  or Brave New Books.
[24:53.880 --> 24:55.880]  Oh, yeah, I am very familiar with both of those.
[24:55.880 --> 24:56.880]  Okay.
[24:56.880 --> 24:58.880]  That's all I wanted to know.
[24:58.880 --> 25:00.880]  Okay, thank you very much.
[25:00.880 --> 25:01.880]  Thank you.
[25:01.880 --> 25:08.880]  Now we're going to go to Mary from Texas.
[25:08.880 --> 25:09.880]  Hi, how are y'all?
[25:09.880 --> 25:12.880]  Hello, Mary.
[25:12.880 --> 25:16.880]  Oh, this is the Mary.
[25:16.880 --> 25:18.880]  Mary Crinnick in Austin, Texas.
[25:18.880 --> 25:22.880]  Absolutely.
[25:22.880 --> 25:23.880]  Okay.
[25:23.880 --> 25:26.880]  I was interested in what y'all were talking about, bar grievances,
[25:26.880 --> 25:31.880]  and Mike also had something funny to add to it.
[25:31.880 --> 25:36.880]  And basically, I had a funny experience.
[25:36.880 --> 25:42.880]  I bar grieved an attorney that's representing somebody I'm in a lawsuit with,
[25:42.880 --> 25:45.880]  and they were in J.P. Court last January.
[25:45.880 --> 25:48.880]  He complained to the judge that I bar grieved against him
[25:48.880 --> 25:50.880]  and tried to get the judge on his side.
[25:50.880 --> 25:55.880]  And he also complained to the judge that I gave him a Christmas present
[25:55.880 --> 26:00.880]  last Christmas Eve, which was a movie, Liar, Liar.
[26:00.880 --> 26:07.880]  So I saw that judge crying in open court and, you know, I'm not sure how it's going to affect him
[26:07.880 --> 26:11.880]  because he's in private practice and he hasn't even advertised.
[26:11.880 --> 26:13.880]  He just keeps it on the down low.
[26:13.880 --> 26:16.880]  But I've seen attorneys cry in court about it,
[26:16.880 --> 26:21.880]  and Mike had an interesting idea about bar grievances.
[26:21.880 --> 26:24.880]  Would you like him to tell you his antidote?
[26:24.880 --> 26:25.880]  Yes.
[26:25.880 --> 26:27.880]  Go ahead, Mike.
[26:27.880 --> 26:28.880]  Hi, Randy. Hi, Deborah.
[26:28.880 --> 26:29.880]  Hello, Mike.
[26:29.880 --> 26:31.880]  I guess...
[26:31.880 --> 26:32.880]  Hey, Mike.
[26:32.880 --> 26:34.880]  Hello.
[26:34.880 --> 26:39.880]  I guess my observation would be if you go to the bar website,
[26:39.880 --> 26:43.880]  they give you guidelines on what constitutes a bar grievance.
[26:43.880 --> 26:49.880]  And if you scroll all the way to the end, you can actually find what they consider relevant.
[26:49.880 --> 26:52.880]  And if anyone's interested in using a bar grievance,
[26:52.880 --> 26:57.880]  and that might be a way of making your bar grievance more effective,
[26:57.880 --> 27:05.880]  would be go to the end of that document and then cite those points in your bar grievance,
[27:05.880 --> 27:11.880]  and then after that put the cause that you believe matches those areas
[27:11.880 --> 27:18.880]  that the bar considered to be relevant towards mispractice.
[27:18.880 --> 27:19.880]  That's a good point.
[27:19.880 --> 27:21.880]  I haven't looked at that.
[27:21.880 --> 27:27.880]  And I also wanted to add, just as a humorous note potentially for the audience,
[27:27.880 --> 27:42.880]  that the agency that insures lawyers, its acronym is TLIE, Texas Lawyer Insurance.
[27:42.880 --> 27:43.880]  I think it's Entity.
[27:43.880 --> 27:47.880]  So TLIE is the insurance company that...
[27:47.880 --> 27:54.880]  And this is in 1979 to service attorneys with reasonable fees for malpractice insurance.
[27:54.880 --> 27:58.880]  That's in their first paragraph mission statement, TLIE.
[27:58.880 --> 28:01.880]  TLIE, truth and lies.
[28:01.880 --> 28:04.880]  I mean, they could have changed the acronym to tile.
[28:04.880 --> 28:09.880]  I mean, that'd be close to Masonic, but they chose TLIE.
[28:09.880 --> 28:10.880]  It is.
[28:10.880 --> 28:19.880]  I understand there are nine companies in the United States that underwrite malpractice insurance,
[28:19.880 --> 28:27.880]  and all nine of those are themselves underwritten by Lloyds of London.
[28:27.880 --> 28:35.880]  So the point of that is, is they all have essentially the same standards.
[28:35.880 --> 28:39.880]  One bar grievance your first year of practice, they cancel immediately.
[28:39.880 --> 28:42.880]  Two bar grievances any one year, they cancel.
[28:42.880 --> 28:47.880]  Three, they cancel your law firm's malpractice.
[28:47.880 --> 28:48.880]  Wow.
[28:48.880 --> 28:54.880]  Well, I encourage people to look on the Texas State Bar website about bar grievances.
[28:54.880 --> 29:01.880]  And again, Mike found at the bottom of some document there was some codes or whatnot again.
[29:01.880 --> 29:03.880]  Well, it's probably their canon, their ethics.
[29:03.880 --> 29:06.880]  Canons are more, I guess, related to judges.
[29:06.880 --> 29:08.880]  Yeah, judges, yeah.
[29:08.880 --> 29:11.880]  But they have their guidelines, and I don't...
[29:11.880 --> 29:14.880]  The bar has standards.
[29:14.880 --> 29:17.880]  The judicial conduct has canons.
[29:17.880 --> 29:18.880]  Okay.
[29:18.880 --> 29:22.880]  And so all those standards are found at the end of the document.
[29:22.880 --> 29:24.880]  You have to scroll all the way to the end.
[29:24.880 --> 29:29.880]  And then, unfortunately, they made the document so you can't cut and paste,
[29:29.880 --> 29:31.880]  which would be obviously very nice.
[29:31.880 --> 29:32.880]  Okay.
[29:32.880 --> 29:39.880]  But you're putting together a website that will create the document, and you won't have that problem.
[29:39.880 --> 29:42.880]  Yeah, I already spent time and...
[29:42.880 --> 29:44.880]  Sorry.
[29:44.880 --> 29:45.880]  Okay, you're breaking up.
[29:45.880 --> 29:47.880]  We're about to go to break.
[29:47.880 --> 29:48.880]  We'll come back on the other side.
[29:48.880 --> 30:00.880]  We'll finish with you quickly, and then we'll go to Wendy from Tennessee.
[30:00.880 --> 30:05.880]  Come down and enjoy Austin's own piece of the Caribbean right on the banks of the Colorado River.
[30:05.880 --> 30:08.880]  One Love Kitchen, jerk chicken and vegetarian food.
[30:08.880 --> 30:10.880]  3109 East Cesar Chavez.
[30:10.880 --> 30:13.880]  That's 3109 East 1st Street right next door to Planet K.
[30:13.880 --> 30:15.880]  Lunch and dinner plates starting at $5.
[30:15.880 --> 30:16.880]  You can't beat that.
[30:16.880 --> 30:20.880]  Serving the real thing, jerk chicken, vegetarian, and seafood Saturdays.
[30:20.880 --> 30:25.880]  Monday through Wednesday, Friday and Saturday, late night with Emperor Sound Crew.
[30:25.880 --> 30:27.880]  All right, also link up at onelovekitchen.net.
[30:27.880 --> 30:31.880]  That's onelovekitchen.net.
[30:31.880 --> 30:35.880]  Everyone knows eating broccoli is good for you, but would you wear it to the beach?
[30:35.880 --> 30:37.880]  You just might want to when you hear the latest research.
[30:37.880 --> 30:42.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll share a surprising new use for this vegetable in just a moment.
[30:42.880 --> 30:46.880]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches,
[30:46.880 --> 30:50.880]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:50.880 --> 30:51.880]  That's creepy.
[30:51.880 --> 30:53.880]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:53.880 --> 30:56.880]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:56.880 --> 31:01.880]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies,
[31:01.880 --> 31:02.880]  and they're third-party certified.
[31:02.880 --> 31:07.880]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[31:07.880 --> 31:09.880]  Great search results and total privacy.
[31:09.880 --> 31:13.880]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:13.880 --> 31:18.880]  Broccoli is loaded with vitamins, minerals, and fiber, and it tastes great in so many ways.
[31:18.880 --> 31:21.880]  Personally, I love mine sauteed with garlic and soy sauce.
[31:21.880 --> 31:25.880]  But now scientists say we might want to slather its juice on our bodies.
[31:25.880 --> 31:26.880]  I'm not joking.
[31:26.880 --> 31:30.880]  Researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that broccoli juice provides better defense
[31:30.880 --> 31:34.880]  against the sun's ultraviolet rays than name-brand sunscreens.
[31:34.880 --> 31:37.880]  Broccoli juice works differently than sunscreen.
[31:37.880 --> 31:39.880]  It doesn't prevent rays from entering the skin.
[31:39.880 --> 31:44.880]  Rather, it prompts the body to produce enzymes that protect the skin against cell damage
[31:44.880 --> 31:46.880]  that ages the skin and can lead to cancer.
[31:46.880 --> 31:51.880]  As a bonus, the juice continues working for several days, even after it's been washed away.
[31:51.880 --> 31:53.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:53.880 --> 31:56.880]  For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:23.880 --> 32:28.880]  Hey, I won't.
[32:28.880 --> 32:31.880]  Oh, I won't.
[32:31.880 --> 32:39.880]  I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes.
[32:39.880 --> 32:43.880]  I really must refuse your news.
[32:43.880 --> 32:46.880]  Also, I've been lied.
[32:46.880 --> 32:54.880]  It seems you like the fact, but please take some words to the wise.
[32:54.880 --> 32:58.880]  Please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
[32:58.880 --> 32:59.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[32:59.880 --> 33:01.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:01.880 --> 33:05.880]  You're hearing me because Randy has suffered a technical difficulty,
[33:05.880 --> 33:07.880]  and we're trying to get him back up on the air.
[33:07.880 --> 33:08.880]  I think he passed out.
[33:08.880 --> 33:11.880]  Actually, I heard a big crash in his studio.
[33:11.880 --> 33:13.880]  I'm going to try to send somebody over there.
[33:13.880 --> 33:17.880]  I hope he's okay.
[33:17.880 --> 33:19.880]  Well, we'll check it out.
[33:19.880 --> 33:22.880]  I think he's actually having a medical emergency right now.
[33:22.880 --> 33:24.880]  I'm pretty worried about him, really.
[33:24.880 --> 33:31.880]  So I'm going to try to see if I can get somebody to find out if he's okay.
[33:31.880 --> 33:32.880]  Okay.
[33:32.880 --> 33:35.880]  But we're going to do the best we can, folks.
[33:35.880 --> 33:39.880]  So if you all have mortgage questions, we may not be able to help you.
[33:39.880 --> 33:40.880]  At least not tonight.
[33:40.880 --> 33:44.880]  But hang on, and we'll finish up with Mary and Mike.
[33:44.880 --> 33:46.880]  All right, Mary and Mike, you all still there?
[33:46.880 --> 33:47.880]  Sir.
[33:47.880 --> 33:49.880]  Okay.
[33:49.880 --> 33:51.880]  So what else you got for us, if anything?
[33:51.880 --> 33:53.880]  Mike, good to hear your voice.
[33:53.880 --> 33:57.880]  Really good to hear your voice too, Eddie.
[33:57.880 --> 34:00.880]  Mary did give you the piece of paperwork, correct?
[34:00.880 --> 34:02.880]  That's correct.
[34:02.880 --> 34:08.880]  That needs to be filed anyway, even though you currently have your situation
[34:08.880 --> 34:11.880]  at the moment, you're still restricted at your liberty.
[34:11.880 --> 34:14.880]  So get that filed ASAP next week.
[34:14.880 --> 34:17.880]  Okay, absolutely.
[34:17.880 --> 34:18.880]  Okay.
[34:18.880 --> 34:19.880]  Okay.
[34:19.880 --> 34:20.880]  All right.
[34:20.880 --> 34:23.880]  Well, anything else you guys have for us?
[34:23.880 --> 34:24.880]  That's all.
[34:24.880 --> 34:25.880]  Thank you.
[34:25.880 --> 34:26.880]  We really appreciate your work.
[34:26.880 --> 34:28.880]  Thank you all very, very much.
[34:28.880 --> 34:29.880]  Well, thank you all for calling in.
[34:29.880 --> 34:33.880]  And thanks also, Mary, for all your help in getting the things down at Brave New
[34:33.880 --> 34:35.880]  Books worked out.
[34:35.880 --> 34:39.880]  Folks, tomorrow, 3 to 6, we'll be giving another seminar down at Brave New
[34:39.880 --> 34:40.880]  Books.
[34:40.880 --> 34:44.880]  We are going to be going over a flow chart and a cross-reference table that
[34:44.880 --> 34:49.880]  I've created regarding Article 1517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[34:49.880 --> 34:55.880]  This is going to be my first attempt to get it done this way, but I've broken
[34:55.880 --> 35:01.880]  Article 1517 down into its component parts, and I have tried to outline and
[35:01.880 --> 35:07.880]  cross-reference each particular constitutional or statutory article or section
[35:07.880 --> 35:12.880]  that is invoked by the language of that particular part of the statute.
[35:12.880 --> 35:14.880]  And we're going to be studying over that.
[35:14.880 --> 35:16.880]  This should be a real good study.
[35:16.880 --> 35:20.880]  If you haven't attended one of these, this would be a really good one to start
[35:20.880 --> 35:21.880]  with.
[35:21.880 --> 35:27.880]  This is going to show us both pictographically and textually exactly what they're
[35:27.880 --> 35:31.880]  supposed to be doing and exactly where they're failing to do it.
[35:31.880 --> 35:37.880]  This is going to give us a very wide-open gateway to go after these people.
[35:37.880 --> 35:38.880]  Okay.
[35:38.880 --> 35:40.880]  New material, Eddie.
[35:40.880 --> 35:41.880]  I'm sorry?
[35:41.880 --> 35:43.880]  It sounds like new material.
[35:43.880 --> 35:45.880]  It is absolutely new material.
[35:45.880 --> 35:50.880]  It gives us a lot of insight into what we've already studied in these, but this
[35:50.880 --> 35:54.880]  is completely new material in and of itself.
[35:54.880 --> 35:59.880]  How are you pacing the lecture subjects?
[35:59.880 --> 36:03.880]  When you mean pacing, what are we referring to?
[36:03.880 --> 36:09.880]  Are we rotating the subjects monthly or creating new subjects every now and
[36:09.880 --> 36:10.880]  then?
[36:10.880 --> 36:12.880]  At the moment, we're building a pond.
[36:12.880 --> 36:16.880]  At some point, we're going to have to go back and try to do a replay for folks
[36:16.880 --> 36:19.880]  that haven't come in in the earlier parts of this.
[36:19.880 --> 36:23.880]  They're going to be in one part where they don't know the foundational parts of
[36:23.880 --> 36:24.880]  it.
[36:24.880 --> 36:29.880]  Eventually, we are going to have to start the cycle again, but right now, we've
[36:29.880 --> 36:34.880]  had pretty much consistently the same people show up at these.
[36:34.880 --> 36:39.880]  As long as we have that going on, then we can pretty much keep building.
[36:39.880 --> 36:41.880]  I'm trying not to make things repetitive.
[36:41.880 --> 36:45.880]  Even if we're having to recover some of the same material at times to make
[36:45.880 --> 36:49.880]  things clear, I'm trying not to make it repetitive in nature.
[36:49.880 --> 36:53.880]  I'm always trying to tie it to something new and useful.
[36:53.880 --> 36:54.880]  Great.
[36:54.880 --> 36:58.880]  Well, y'all have a great night, and we'll see y'all tomorrow from 3 to 6 at
[36:58.880 --> 36:59.880]  Brave New Vix.
[36:59.880 --> 37:00.880]  Thanks, Debbie.
[37:00.880 --> 37:01.880]  Thanks, Randy.
[37:01.880 --> 37:02.880]  Thanks, Eddie.
[37:02.880 --> 37:03.880]  Thanks, Mary.
[37:03.880 --> 37:04.880]  All right.
[37:04.880 --> 37:05.880]  Y'all have a good night.
[37:05.880 --> 37:09.880]  Okay, and do remember, it's a $20 cover charge per person, but folks,
[37:09.880 --> 37:13.880]  hopefully you'll leave there with a whole lot more under your belt than what
[37:13.880 --> 37:16.880]  you would normally get for 20 bucks.
[37:16.880 --> 37:20.880]  I throw everything I have into this when I give a presentation down there
[37:20.880 --> 37:23.880]  because I don't want anyone to feel like they're not getting what they paid
[37:23.880 --> 37:27.880]  for or like the information they're given isn't going to help them.
[37:27.880 --> 37:31.880]  So if you haven't been the one, this would be the time to start.
[37:31.880 --> 37:34.880]  Okay, we have Wendy in Tennessee.
[37:34.880 --> 37:35.880]  Hi, Wendy.
[37:35.880 --> 37:36.880]  How are you?
[37:36.880 --> 37:37.880]  Hey, Eddie.
[37:37.880 --> 37:38.880]  Hey, Deborah.
[37:38.880 --> 37:39.880]  We haven't heard from you in a while.
[37:39.880 --> 37:42.880]  We were hoping you weren't buried somewhere by now with all the trouble you
[37:42.880 --> 37:43.880]  were causing.
[37:43.880 --> 37:46.880]  No, I'm not buried.
[37:46.880 --> 37:50.880]  I guess I'm still causing problems, but my friend Buddy's causing me more
[37:50.880 --> 37:52.880]  problems than anybody.
[37:52.880 --> 37:56.880]  You know, I don't know if you remember last week when I called about the
[37:56.880 --> 38:03.880]  assault that he was involved in when the man pulled a gun on him, and even
[38:03.880 --> 38:07.880]  that man filed for the restraining order, and yesterday he went to court.
[38:07.880 --> 38:10.880]  That man did get the restraining order against him.
[38:10.880 --> 38:13.880]  Now, here we go to the federal court, okay?
[38:13.880 --> 38:20.880]  His case, which this man was involved, and the sheriff, and the mayor, and
[38:20.880 --> 38:25.880]  everybody else in town, anyway, that's for taking his home.
[38:25.880 --> 38:34.880]  And well, today I checked on Pacer, and that court has dismissed every claim
[38:34.880 --> 38:42.880]  after he had already ruled and dismissed their motion to dismiss in summary
[38:42.880 --> 38:43.880]  judgment.
[38:43.880 --> 38:45.880]  They already dismissed their motions, denied them.
[38:45.880 --> 38:47.880]  Today they've dismissed every one of them.
[38:47.880 --> 38:49.880]  The opposing side's motions, or?
[38:49.880 --> 38:52.880]  I didn't hear you, huh?
[38:52.880 --> 38:55.880]  Dismissed whose motions?
[38:55.880 --> 38:56.880]  The opposing side?
[38:56.880 --> 38:59.880]  The opposing side has had all filed.
[38:59.880 --> 39:02.880]  There are 16, 17 defendants.
[39:02.880 --> 39:06.880]  They all filed a motion to dismiss summary judgment, right?
[39:06.880 --> 39:09.880]  And the court denied every one of them.
[39:09.880 --> 39:16.880]  Well, after they apparently, he got the injunction, they dismissed all the
[39:16.880 --> 39:23.880]  defendants from his civil case.
[39:23.880 --> 39:28.880]  Okay, so they used the injunction to dismiss his civil suit?
[39:28.880 --> 39:31.880]  I think it has something to do with it.
[39:31.880 --> 39:35.880]  Now, this was not the judge in his civil suit.
[39:35.880 --> 39:42.880]  It was the U.S. magistrate who dismissed all the defendants' cases.
[39:42.880 --> 39:44.880]  Dismissed the defendants.
[39:44.880 --> 39:47.880]  Were the defendants countersuing?
[39:47.880 --> 39:48.880]  No.
[39:48.880 --> 39:51.880]  Let me try to explain it in my terminology, okay?
[39:51.880 --> 39:52.880]  But he was the plaintiff.
[39:52.880 --> 39:58.880]  He had 16 defendants, okay, in his civil case.
[39:58.880 --> 40:02.880]  Well, they had all filed a motion to dismiss summary judgment,
[40:02.880 --> 40:07.880]  and they were all denied, and he still had his 15, 16 defendants, okay?
[40:07.880 --> 40:11.880]  Well, yesterday, after he went to court, today, when I checked on Pasteur,
[40:11.880 --> 40:18.880]  the U.S. magistrate had dismissed all his claims against those defendants.
[40:18.880 --> 40:19.880]  Does that make sense?
[40:19.880 --> 40:24.880]  Now, the U.S. magistrate is or is not the same magistrate that had denied
[40:24.880 --> 40:27.880]  their petitions or their motions?
[40:27.880 --> 40:29.880]  The judge denied their motions.
[40:29.880 --> 40:32.880]  The judge in the case denied their motions.
[40:32.880 --> 40:35.880]  Okay, so how did the magistrate get into this?
[40:35.880 --> 40:37.880]  And this judge, was he state or was he federal?
[40:37.880 --> 40:40.880]  He federal.
[40:40.880 --> 40:44.880]  So how did this magistrate get into the picture to dismiss behind the other
[40:44.880 --> 40:47.880]  judge who has jurisdiction?
[40:47.880 --> 40:49.880]  You know, that's a good question.
[40:49.880 --> 40:53.880]  Could it be that he's from good old Blount County?
[40:53.880 --> 40:58.880]  Well, the problem here is, though, if this judge is not the presiding judge
[40:58.880 --> 41:02.880]  over the case, where did he get the authority to dismiss?
[41:02.880 --> 41:08.880]  How could they petition a judge that has no active jurisdiction in the case?
[41:08.880 --> 41:12.880]  If it's not assigned to him, he shouldn't be reviewing anything if the case is
[41:12.880 --> 41:15.880]  already filed and pending in another court.
[41:15.880 --> 41:20.880]  Well, he, you know, in a federal court, they have presiding judge, blah, blah,
[41:20.880 --> 41:21.880]  blah.
[41:21.880 --> 41:23.880]  Then they have the U.S. magistrate.
[41:23.880 --> 41:31.880]  Now, we already disqualified this U.S. magistrate from ruling on any documents.
[41:31.880 --> 41:33.880]  That was granted.
[41:33.880 --> 41:37.880]  But, somehow, here he came and dismissed all the defendants.
[41:37.880 --> 41:40.880]  Then I would file charges against this federal magistrate for acting without
[41:40.880 --> 41:41.880]  jurisdiction.
[41:41.880 --> 41:45.880]  If he was already disqualified from ruling on any documents, then this would
[41:45.880 --> 41:48.880]  definitely qualify as doing just that.
[41:48.880 --> 41:49.880]  Right.
[41:49.880 --> 41:53.880]  And he knew full well that he was disqualified and lacked jurisdiction.
[41:53.880 --> 41:57.880]  Therefore, he committed a criminal act, knowingly and willingly.
[41:57.880 --> 42:00.880]  And that should be easy enough to prove if you've got the original signed order
[42:00.880 --> 42:02.880]  denying him that right or that power.
[42:02.880 --> 42:03.880]  Oh, yeah.
[42:03.880 --> 42:04.880]  I've got all the documents.
[42:04.880 --> 42:09.880]  I kept up this pacer and copy my log of notebooks and stuff of it.
[42:09.880 --> 42:15.880]  Then I would contact the presiding judge, let him know what's going on, and I
[42:15.880 --> 42:20.880]  would take that original signed order and a criminal complaint to a federal
[42:20.880 --> 42:26.880]  marshal and to a United States attorney.
[42:26.880 --> 42:28.880]  Okay.
[42:28.880 --> 42:29.880]  Okay.
[42:29.880 --> 42:30.880]  We'll do.
[42:30.880 --> 42:31.880]  Doesn't matter.
[42:31.880 --> 42:32.880]  Okay.
[42:32.880 --> 42:34.880]  Now, let me ask you this.
[42:34.880 --> 42:42.880]  On this magistrate, now, in his order that he wrote, which is as well as
[42:42.880 --> 42:48.880]  we're in a hamburger, we had a discovery conference scheduled for Wednesday
[42:48.880 --> 42:53.880]  morning at 9 a.m., okay?
[42:53.880 --> 42:56.880]  So where does that take us there on this?
[42:56.880 --> 42:57.880]  I mean, they didn't contact us.
[42:57.880 --> 43:02.880]  Well, if he dismissed all the defendants, there's nobody to discover from.
[43:02.880 --> 43:04.880]  Right.
[43:04.880 --> 43:09.880]  But the problem is you need to contact the court where the hearing was to be
[43:09.880 --> 43:12.880]  held and ask them if the hearing is still docketed.
[43:12.880 --> 43:13.880]  Okay.
[43:13.880 --> 43:16.880]  If the hearing is docketed, show up.
[43:16.880 --> 43:17.880]  Okay.
[43:17.880 --> 43:23.880]  And since the other judge acted without jurisdiction, he has no proper
[43:23.880 --> 43:25.880]  dismissal power of the defendants.
[43:25.880 --> 43:31.880]  If the defendants fail to show at this hearing, move for summary judgment in
[43:31.880 --> 43:33.880]  his favor.
[43:33.880 --> 43:34.880]  Got you.
[43:34.880 --> 43:36.880]  I appreciate that.
[43:36.880 --> 43:37.880]  Yes, ma'am.
[43:37.880 --> 43:39.880]  You don't have to run off, okay?
[43:39.880 --> 43:40.880]  All right.
[43:40.880 --> 43:41.880]  Anyway, I'll talk to y'all later.
[43:41.880 --> 43:43.880]  Y'all have a good night.
[43:43.880 --> 43:44.880]  All right.
[43:44.880 --> 43:45.880]  Thanks for calling in.
[43:45.880 --> 43:46.880]  Okay, hon.
[43:46.880 --> 43:47.880]  Bye-bye.
[43:47.880 --> 43:48.880]  Bye-bye.
[43:48.880 --> 43:49.880]  All right, folks.
[43:49.880 --> 43:50.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:50.880 --> 43:51.880]  We're about to go to break.
[43:51.880 --> 43:55.880]  We will be right back, 512-646-1984.
[43:55.880 --> 44:00.880]  We will be right back.
[44:00.880 --> 44:02.880]  More energy.
[44:02.880 --> 44:04.880]  Stronger immune power.
[44:04.880 --> 44:07.880]  Improved sense of well-being.
[44:07.880 --> 44:10.880]  How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[44:10.880 --> 44:15.880]  The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on
[44:15.880 --> 44:16.880]  their promises.
[44:16.880 --> 44:20.880]  And Centrition does just that.
[44:20.880 --> 44:24.880]  Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[44:24.880 --> 44:29.880]  In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as
[44:29.880 --> 44:34.880]  the healing component, and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as
[44:34.880 --> 44:36.880]  a balanced nutrient base.
[44:36.880 --> 44:40.880]  Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[44:40.880 --> 44:46.880]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[44:46.880 --> 44:54.880]  Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[44:54.880 --> 44:59.880]  After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[44:59.880 --> 45:02.880]  Special Roast Hemp Coffee from HempUSA.org.
[45:02.880 --> 45:06.880]  Our coffee grows in the dense volcanic rich soil, herbicide and pesticide free,
[45:06.880 --> 45:11.880]  and in the high altitudes of Guatemala, in conditions that are ideal for natural
[45:11.880 --> 45:13.880]  growth of this high quality coffee.
[45:13.880 --> 45:17.880]  Try our mellow cup of coffee that is ground and roasted with 25% hemp seed from
[45:17.880 --> 45:18.880]  Canada.
[45:18.880 --> 45:22.880]  With a wonderful nutty flavor that contains 18% protein, our roasters bring a
[45:22.880 --> 45:27.880]  unique flavor that makes this the best cup of coffee you'll ever have.
[45:27.880 --> 45:31.880]  Try our new Special Roast Hemp Coffee from HempUSA.org and wake up your brain
[45:31.880 --> 45:33.880]  without the jitters.
[45:33.880 --> 45:36.880]  Our customers look forward to their next cup of hemp coffee.
[45:36.880 --> 45:42.880]  Visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608.
[45:42.880 --> 45:48.880]  That's 908-691-2608, and see if you'll change your mind about drinking coffee
[45:48.880 --> 45:49.880]  again.
[45:49.880 --> 45:55.880]  Taste the difference, feel the difference at HempUSA.org today.
[45:55.880 --> 46:23.880]  Music
[46:23.880 --> 46:33.880]  Music
[46:33.880 --> 46:43.880]  Music
[46:43.880 --> 46:53.880]  Music
[46:53.880 --> 47:13.880]  Music
[47:13.880 --> 47:23.880]  Music
[47:23.880 --> 47:47.880]  Music
[47:47.880 --> 47:57.880]  Music
[47:57.880 --> 47:59.880]  Hi folks, we are back.
[47:59.880 --> 48:01.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[48:01.880 --> 48:04.880]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[48:04.880 --> 48:09.880]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[48:09.880 --> 48:14.880]  We do have some callers on the board, but we could use some more.
[48:14.880 --> 48:19.880]  We still have a good hour and 15 minutes left in the show, so if you're out there
[48:19.880 --> 48:22.880]  and have a problem or a question, please give us a call.
[48:22.880 --> 48:24.880]  Right now, let's take William in Texas.
[48:24.880 --> 48:27.880]  William, how are you doing and what can we do for you?
[48:27.880 --> 48:31.880]  Hey, Eddie, how are you doing tonight?
[48:31.880 --> 48:32.880]  Well, so far so good.
[48:32.880 --> 48:36.880]  No one's shooting at me or chasing me, so it's a good time right now.
[48:36.880 --> 48:38.880]  That's a good thing.
[48:38.880 --> 48:47.880]  I'm kind of at a loss right now. I'm having to deal with CPS.
[48:47.880 --> 48:52.880]  What I did is I made an initial complaint on a child that we were overseeing,
[48:52.880 --> 49:04.880]  and they came out and assessed the situation, came back the next day while I was out of the house.
[49:04.880 --> 49:11.880]  When I came back, there were officers from CPS and officers from the police department
[49:11.880 --> 49:19.880]  picking up our kids, and they already had an emergency removal on hand.
[49:19.880 --> 49:26.880]  So basically, me and my wife have been going back and forth trying to deal with the CPS
[49:26.880 --> 49:36.880]  and kind of playing ball with them, but I know for a fact that they're violating our rights left and right.
[49:36.880 --> 49:45.880]  I've been keeping a paper trail of everything that they've handed us, every conversation.
[49:45.880 --> 49:51.880]  They did drug screens on us. I went down and got all the paperwork today.
[49:51.880 --> 49:57.880]  They pushed off the hearing once already because I'm hot on their trail
[49:57.880 --> 50:02.880]  and I'm trying to collect evidence to try to get this dismissed.
[50:02.880 --> 50:09.880]  I'm not too sure if I'm on the right page or if I'm just feeling overwhelmed by all this.
[50:09.880 --> 50:12.880]  Okay. Well, let me clarify what's going on here.
[50:12.880 --> 50:18.880]  You have actual kids of your own, and there's a kid that's been placed with you for some purpose,
[50:18.880 --> 50:22.880]  or was it one of your own that you made a report on?
[50:22.880 --> 50:31.880]  No, it was a child that we took custody of from a friend of my wife.
[50:31.880 --> 50:37.880]  She was incarcerated, and she asked us to oversee the child.
[50:37.880 --> 50:42.880]  We've had her for about a year.
[50:42.880 --> 50:49.880]  She was born in Galveston where we went down to pick her up,
[50:49.880 --> 50:54.880]  brought her back, and we treated her like she was our own.
[50:54.880 --> 50:58.880]  She even got to the point where she was called me dad.
[50:58.880 --> 51:08.880]  What had happened is there were some circumstances where the mother was out of the home,
[51:08.880 --> 51:15.880]  and the child developed a bruise on her behind.
[51:15.880 --> 51:19.880]  Well, the bruise continued to grow.
[51:19.880 --> 51:24.880]  My mother-in-law had her for roughly about a week, and then I had her about a week,
[51:24.880 --> 51:29.880]  and I told the mother, I was like, you need to get this taken care of.
[51:29.880 --> 51:32.880]  Take her to the doctor. She refused to do it.
[51:32.880 --> 51:40.880]  So I went ahead, took her to the doctor, had it treated, had medicine going in her,
[51:40.880 --> 51:43.880]  and it started to get better.
[51:43.880 --> 51:54.880]  The child was walking around and everything, able to work with this infection on her butt.
[51:54.880 --> 52:01.880]  But I refused the mother entry back into the home because of the mere fact
[52:01.880 --> 52:05.880]  that she wasn't taking care of her child and wouldn't take her to the doctor.
[52:05.880 --> 52:11.880]  So she threatened to call the police. That's when I notified CPS.
[52:11.880 --> 52:16.880]  Okay, so how did that wind up with your children being involved in the mix?
[52:16.880 --> 52:25.880]  Well, CPS, I told them that I believe that there were some type of drugs involved.
[52:25.880 --> 52:32.880]  Well, I guess that sent up red flags with them. So they went and had an emergency order done
[52:32.880 --> 52:39.880]  and had not only the child that we were seeing, but all of our children picked up.
[52:39.880 --> 52:48.880]  They've done drug tests on all of us, and I came up clean, and my son came up clean,
[52:48.880 --> 52:55.880]  my daughter came up clean, but my youngest daughter came up clean, or came up unclean, I'm sorry,
[52:55.880 --> 53:02.880]  came up dirty, and we're trying to figure out why that even happened.
[53:02.880 --> 53:11.880]  So at this situation, they're trying to permanently remove the children from our custody.
[53:11.880 --> 53:19.880]  Okay, well the first question is, what authority do they have to ask your family for drug screening?
[53:19.880 --> 53:27.880]  And the second question would be, why did you all agree to it to begin with?
[53:27.880 --> 53:34.880]  Yeah, they did it on the kids against our will, and for some reason...
[53:34.880 --> 53:42.880]  Okay, they drug tested kids without the parents' consent.
[53:42.880 --> 53:49.880]  Okay, sounds like unlawful search to me.
[53:49.880 --> 53:52.880]  All right, what next?
[53:52.880 --> 54:04.880]  Well, they took the children from us and restricted us from seeing them.
[54:04.880 --> 54:13.880]  I told the caseworker, I told him that he was violating my rights, and that...
[54:13.880 --> 54:16.880]  Please excuse me, I'm kind of frustrated about all of this.
[54:16.880 --> 54:18.880]  No, I understand.
[54:18.880 --> 54:25.880]  And he said, well, I understand your situation, but I have to do what I have to do,
[54:25.880 --> 54:28.880]  and my supervisor told me to do this.
[54:28.880 --> 54:38.880]  So they asked to come back for an interview after our drug test.
[54:38.880 --> 54:44.880]  I knew that I would come back clean,
[54:44.880 --> 54:54.880]  but I figured I'd go ahead and go with their request for that.
[54:54.880 --> 55:01.880]  And then they had it sent off, and then when it got back here...
[55:01.880 --> 55:02.880]  What was it?
[55:02.880 --> 55:08.880]  Yesterday, I asked for all the documentation on that.
[55:08.880 --> 55:10.880]  They refused to give it to us.
[55:10.880 --> 55:16.880]  I basically had to chase it all the way down to the court,
[55:16.880 --> 55:22.880]  and I was sitting here trying to build a case, or at least a motion to dismiss,
[55:22.880 --> 55:35.880]  and they certain me with a new set of orders to move the trial for two days later.
[55:35.880 --> 55:43.880]  So I'm not too sure if I'm hitting them on certain things that they're trying to cover up,
[55:43.880 --> 55:51.880]  or if they're one step ahead of me and they need more time to investigate.
[55:51.880 --> 55:57.880]  So I'm kind of wondering what would be the appropriate action to take
[55:57.880 --> 56:03.880]  against such a large organization that I know have violated my rights.
[56:03.880 --> 56:07.880]  Well, the problem you got is you're the one that involved them.
[56:07.880 --> 56:10.880]  Here's the problem with child protective services.
[56:10.880 --> 56:13.880]  In Texas and pretty much every other state,
[56:13.880 --> 56:17.880]  they're given a wide latitude to do whatever they want,
[56:17.880 --> 56:22.880]  regardless of the rights of the individual or the children in any matter,
[56:22.880 --> 56:26.880]  and they're treated as if they can do no wrong.
[56:26.880 --> 56:28.880]  If you want to do anything with them,
[56:28.880 --> 56:32.880]  the only option you're going to have is to go after them civilly.
[56:32.880 --> 56:36.880]  As far as the rest of this, you can try to file a habeas corpus with the court
[56:36.880 --> 56:41.880]  to demand that your children be released from the custody of the CPS.
[56:41.880 --> 56:45.880]  Then go before the magistrate and have them explain to that magistrate
[56:45.880 --> 56:50.880]  why they took your children, all right?
[56:50.880 --> 56:53.880]  And that will also give you opportunity to do the same,
[56:53.880 --> 56:56.880]  to show there was no cause to take your children.
[56:56.880 --> 57:00.880]  Now, hindsight being, 2020, I'll make another recommendation to you
[57:00.880 --> 57:03.880]  and anyone else listening in regards to CPS.
[57:03.880 --> 57:07.880]  Don't ever call them.
[57:07.880 --> 57:11.880]  If you have an issue with someone abusing a child,
[57:11.880 --> 57:18.880]  make a police report, but do not call CPS.
[57:18.880 --> 57:20.880]  Call the police.
[57:20.880 --> 57:24.880]  Let the police deal with CPS.
[57:24.880 --> 57:29.880]  That keeps you from being directly involved.
[57:29.880 --> 57:37.880]  That does not give CPS any recourse to come into your family.
[57:37.880 --> 57:41.880]  But don't ever call those people.
[57:41.880 --> 57:48.880]  They are power-mad individuals that run that agency.
[57:48.880 --> 57:54.880]  They have an Obama complex, and that complex is a God complex.
[57:54.880 --> 58:02.880]  They are untouchable and unaccountable, and they know it.
[58:02.880 --> 58:06.880]  But that's what I would do is file a writ of habeas corpus with the district court
[58:06.880 --> 58:10.880]  and demand that they have CPS produce the children
[58:10.880 --> 58:13.880]  and have a hearing over why they were taken in the first place
[58:13.880 --> 58:15.880]  and demand their release.
[58:15.880 --> 58:17.880]  Okay, thanks, Eddie.
[58:17.880 --> 58:19.880]  All right, you're welcome.
[58:19.880 --> 58:23.880]  We'll keep you in our prayers about that.
[58:23.880 --> 58:25.880]  Thank you.
[58:25.880 --> 58:28.880]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[58:28.880 --> 58:31.880]  We are about to go to break.
[58:31.880 --> 58:35.880]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:35.880 --> 58:39.880]  William, Jim, Jace, or Jim and Jace, see you there on the call board.
[58:39.880 --> 58:41.880]  So please hang on, folks.
[58:41.880 --> 58:43.880]  If you have a question or an issue, give us a call.
[58:43.880 --> 58:59.880]  We will be right back on the other side of this break.
[58:59.880 --> 59:03.880]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[59:03.880 --> 59:07.880]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:07.880 --> 59:11.880]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:11.880 --> 59:16.880]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:16.880 --> 59:18.880]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:18.880 --> 59:22.880]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:22.880 --> 59:27.880]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:27.880 --> 59:31.880]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:31.880 --> 59:34.880]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:34.880 --> 59:37.880]  beyond what you've ever experienced before.
[59:37.880 --> 59:42.880]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:42.880 --> 59:53.880]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.880 --> 59:57.880]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.880 --> 59:59.880]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:59.880 --> 01:00:03.880]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:03.880 --> 01:00:07.880]  A commission set up by Barack Obama in the wake of the Gulf oil disaster
[01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:11.880]  will likely spare BP from a gross negligence charge.
[01:00:11.880 --> 01:00:13.880]  According to an official document Thursday,
[01:00:13.880 --> 01:00:18.880]  the commission will instead opt to disperse the blame on numerous companies involved,
[01:00:18.880 --> 01:00:22.880]  including Transocean and Halliburton.
[01:00:22.880 --> 01:00:27.880]  The Watchdog Global Witness warned Thursday Sudan is on the path to conflict
[01:00:27.880 --> 01:00:29.880]  over an oil revenue dispute,
[01:00:29.880 --> 01:00:35.880]  a wealth-sharing deal splitting oil profits between North and South Sudan is set to expire
[01:00:35.880 --> 01:00:37.880]  following the secession vote Sunday.
[01:00:37.880 --> 01:00:42.880]  Global Witness found the Sudanese government and the China National Petroleum Corporation
[01:00:42.880 --> 01:00:47.880]  have failed to explain significant discrepancies in oil production numbers,
[01:00:47.880 --> 01:00:50.880]  suggesting the Northern government was undercounting production
[01:00:50.880 --> 01:00:54.880]  and withholding oil revenue to the South.
[01:00:54.880 --> 01:00:59.880]  Students protesting police violence in Ankara, Turkey Wednesday were tear gassed
[01:00:59.880 --> 01:01:02.880]  and blasted with water cannons by police.
[01:01:02.880 --> 01:01:07.880]  Students intended to rally outside the ruling Justice and Development Party headquarters.
[01:01:07.880 --> 01:01:10.880]  The protest was in reaction to the violent police response
[01:01:10.880 --> 01:01:14.880]  at a December demonstration in Istanbul.
[01:01:14.880 --> 01:01:19.880]  A tearful John Dana Wednesday was sworn in as speaker of the 112th Congress,
[01:01:19.880 --> 01:01:24.880]  and the new Republican majority approved rules requiring spending increases
[01:01:24.880 --> 01:01:26.880]  be offset by cuts in the budget.
[01:01:26.880 --> 01:01:30.880]  However, the new rules would allow enactment of future tax cuts
[01:01:30.880 --> 01:01:32.880]  without offsetting spending reductions
[01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:35.880]  and permit repeal of the health care reform legislation,
[01:01:35.880 --> 01:01:41.880]  which was estimated to save the government more than $140 billion over 10 years.
[01:01:41.880 --> 01:01:47.880]  The loss of revenue from slashing health care reform would not have to be compensated elsewhere.
[01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:50.880]  Dana pledged to give the government back to the American people,
[01:01:50.880 --> 01:01:55.880]  just as the new Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Darrell Issa,
[01:01:55.880 --> 01:02:02.880]  wrote to 150 businesses and trade groups asking for suggestions on loosening corporate regulations.
[01:02:02.880 --> 01:02:08.880]  Issa received swift replies from banks protesting new controls on debit card fees
[01:02:08.880 --> 01:02:16.880]  and from manufacturers opposed to environmental protection agency limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
[01:02:16.880 --> 01:02:21.880]  The number of poor people in the U.S. is millions higher than previously known.
[01:02:21.880 --> 01:02:25.880]  Preliminary census figures released Wednesday show one in six Americans,
[01:02:25.880 --> 01:02:31.880]  many 65 and older, are struggling with poverty due to rising medical and other costs.
[01:02:31.880 --> 01:02:39.880]  Under a new census formula, poverty in 2009 stood at 15.7 percent, or 47.8 million people,
[01:02:39.880 --> 01:02:45.880]  4.2 million more people than the official 2009 rate of 14.3 percent.
[01:02:45.880 --> 01:02:51.880]  Economists have long criticized the official poverty measure because it only includes pre-tax cash income
[01:02:51.880 --> 01:03:15.880]  and doesn't account for medical, transportation and work expenses.
[01:03:21.880 --> 01:03:42.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:42.880 --> 01:03:43.880]  Really long radio.
[01:03:43.880 --> 01:03:44.880]  Any corrections?
[01:03:44.880 --> 01:03:47.880]  Randy Felton.
[01:03:47.880 --> 01:03:49.880]  Randy has had a technical issue.
[01:03:49.880 --> 01:03:54.880]  He has managed to hurt himself or something or other, but he's been checked on.
[01:03:54.880 --> 01:03:55.880]  He's doing all right at the moment.
[01:03:55.880 --> 01:04:01.880]  But in any case, at the moment, it's just yours truly, so please hang in there and bear with me.
[01:04:01.880 --> 01:04:03.880]  And we will try to get to everybody.
[01:04:03.880 --> 01:04:05.880]  And we've got a couple of more callers.
[01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:06.880]  Dan's been added.
[01:04:06.880 --> 01:04:10.880]  But right now, we are going to be going to Jim in Washington.
[01:04:10.880 --> 01:04:16.880]  Jim, what can we do for you?
[01:04:16.880 --> 01:04:21.880]  Jim, I guess we couldn't do much around this.
[01:04:21.880 --> 01:04:22.880]  Can you hear me?
[01:04:22.880 --> 01:04:23.880]  Ah, I can hear you now.
[01:04:23.880 --> 01:04:25.880]  For a second, I thought you'd cut off there.
[01:04:25.880 --> 01:04:26.880]  Hi, Jim.
[01:04:26.880 --> 01:04:31.880]  I didn't expect you to come to me.
[01:04:31.880 --> 01:04:47.880]  My question is, with – I'm sorry, I expected the screener to get to me and it didn't happen.
[01:04:47.880 --> 01:04:48.880]  Well, that's okay.
[01:04:48.880 --> 01:04:50.880]  We got you now.
[01:04:50.880 --> 01:04:57.880]  My question is, with – never mind.
[01:04:57.880 --> 01:04:58.880]  I'll call back.
[01:04:58.880 --> 01:04:59.880]  Thanks.
[01:04:59.880 --> 01:05:02.880]  Okay.
[01:05:02.880 --> 01:05:03.880]  All right.
[01:05:03.880 --> 01:05:04.880]  Well, that problem was simple enough.
[01:05:04.880 --> 01:05:05.880]  All right.
[01:05:05.880 --> 01:05:06.880]  Let's go to Jay in California.
[01:05:06.880 --> 01:05:08.880]  Jay, what can we do for you?
[01:05:08.880 --> 01:05:09.880]  Good evening.
[01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:17.880]  I am calling because I found out about your law program after watching YouTube and the
[01:05:17.880 --> 01:05:19.880]  Straw Man series.
[01:05:19.880 --> 01:05:25.880]  I have been dealing with a court situation where my mother gave me power of attorney
[01:05:25.880 --> 01:05:30.880]  and a health care proxy, but my older brother stole United States mail.
[01:05:30.880 --> 01:05:35.880]  And even though I presented a police report and showed them that they're proceeding
[01:05:35.880 --> 01:05:41.880]  with the fruit of a poison tree, they have taken my mother and put her into a substandard
[01:05:41.880 --> 01:05:42.880]  nursing home.
[01:05:42.880 --> 01:05:45.880]  I haven't been able to see or talk to my mother.
[01:05:45.880 --> 01:05:51.880]  And even though I have a judge who I've made it known in litigation that the Office of
[01:05:51.880 --> 01:05:55.880]  the Public Guardian of the State of New Jersey isn't performing the duties that they were
[01:05:55.880 --> 01:06:00.880]  court ordered to perform, the judge refuses to take any action.
[01:06:00.880 --> 01:06:02.880]  He acts like I haven't written.
[01:06:02.880 --> 01:06:07.880]  As I was watching the Straw Man series, it was brought to my attention that there's
[01:06:07.880 --> 01:06:10.880]  two different functions that we have as proxy people.
[01:06:10.880 --> 01:06:15.880]  One is a motion to recuse and the other is a motion to disqualify.
[01:06:15.880 --> 01:06:17.880]  Okay.
[01:06:17.880 --> 01:06:20.880]  Well, the first thing is that part's correct.
[01:06:20.880 --> 01:06:24.880]  But you're confusing me on this Straw Man theory stuff.
[01:06:24.880 --> 01:06:27.880]  Because Straw Man is not something we do here.
[01:06:27.880 --> 01:06:30.880]  Okay.
[01:06:30.880 --> 01:06:31.880]  All right.
[01:06:31.880 --> 01:06:32.880]  Okay.
[01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:35.880]  Yes, you can do a motion to disqualify or a motion to recuse.
[01:06:35.880 --> 01:06:39.880]  The thing about it is, though, is do you already have a signed order in your favor from
[01:06:39.880 --> 01:06:41.880]  this judge?
[01:06:41.880 --> 01:06:42.880]  No.
[01:06:42.880 --> 01:06:43.880]  No.
[01:06:43.880 --> 01:06:44.880]  Okay.
[01:06:44.880 --> 01:06:50.880]  In fact, this is the third judge that I've faced in the proceeding.
[01:06:50.880 --> 01:06:57.880]  But none of the judges acknowledge that they're proceeding with fruit of the poison tree.
[01:06:57.880 --> 01:06:58.880]  Okay.
[01:06:58.880 --> 01:07:00.880]  When you say it's fruit of the poison tree, what are we talking about?
[01:07:00.880 --> 01:07:05.880]  The state and the U.S. Constitution.
[01:07:05.880 --> 01:07:07.880]  Okay.
[01:07:07.880 --> 01:07:08.880]  But explain that.
[01:07:08.880 --> 01:07:12.880]  How is what they're doing fruit of the poison tree?
[01:07:12.880 --> 01:07:16.880]  My brother took a piece of United States mail.
[01:07:16.880 --> 01:07:17.880]  It came in the mail.
[01:07:17.880 --> 01:07:19.880]  It was never received by me.
[01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:24.880]  And it was under my jurisdiction of my power of attorney.
[01:07:24.880 --> 01:07:25.880]  Okay.
[01:07:25.880 --> 01:07:28.880]  And this piece of mail dealt with what?
[01:07:28.880 --> 01:07:32.880]  The mail dealt with my mother's banking statement.
[01:07:32.880 --> 01:07:33.880]  Okay.
[01:07:33.880 --> 01:07:37.880]  He was trying to say that I was making illegal transactions, which I was not because I was
[01:07:37.880 --> 01:07:41.880]  protected under the power of attorney.
[01:07:41.880 --> 01:07:46.880]  And I didn't know that he had had the document.
[01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:52.880]  When I was trying to move my mother west from New Jersey for her health and for benefit
[01:07:52.880 --> 01:07:58.880]  of fighting dementia through exercising, year-round exercising, my brother began to say,
[01:07:58.880 --> 01:08:03.880]  you're taking her away from me, and began to file false charges with Adult Protector
[01:08:03.880 --> 01:08:04.880]  Services.
[01:08:04.880 --> 01:08:10.880]  When that didn't work, then he took the stolen mail that he had and said that in his filing
[01:08:10.880 --> 01:08:15.880]  that he managed to obtain a copy of my mother's checking account statement, for which he did
[01:08:15.880 --> 01:08:17.880]  not have jurisdiction.
[01:08:17.880 --> 01:08:23.880]  Now the state of New Jersey's constitution says in Article 1, Subsection 7, that a person
[01:08:23.880 --> 01:08:27.880]  should have privacy in their home, person, and papers.
[01:08:27.880 --> 01:08:28.880]  Yes.
[01:08:28.880 --> 01:08:32.880]  However, the issue you have here is not a constitutional question.
[01:08:32.880 --> 01:08:34.880]  It's a federal mail question.
[01:08:34.880 --> 01:08:40.880]  He obtained the checking account document, but the court never asked that.
[01:08:40.880 --> 01:08:41.880]  Okay.
[01:08:41.880 --> 01:08:43.880]  But are you listening to what I'm saying?
[01:08:43.880 --> 01:08:48.880]  You should have reported this to the federal postmaster general.
[01:08:48.880 --> 01:08:53.880]  The moment you knew he had taken a piece of United States mail out of a post off or out
[01:08:53.880 --> 01:08:59.880]  of a box that was not his nor addressed to him, you should have notified the federal
[01:08:59.880 --> 01:09:02.880]  authorities under the postmaster.
[01:09:02.880 --> 01:09:03.880]  I did.
[01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:08.880]  I reported the police report and I went to the postmaster of the local city that I was
[01:09:08.880 --> 01:09:11.880]  in at the time of Newark, New Jersey.
[01:09:11.880 --> 01:09:14.880]  Nothing has happened.
[01:09:14.880 --> 01:09:16.880]  Okay.
[01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:20.880]  And did you call the postmaster general or write the postmaster general of the United
[01:09:20.880 --> 01:09:21.880]  States?
[01:09:21.880 --> 01:09:23.880]  I did.
[01:09:23.880 --> 01:09:24.880]  You did?
[01:09:24.880 --> 01:09:26.880]  I did.
[01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:27.880]  And still nothing happened.
[01:09:27.880 --> 01:09:32.880]  Did you send the mail certified receipt or certified mail return receipt requested?
[01:09:32.880 --> 01:09:33.880]  No, I did not.
[01:09:33.880 --> 01:09:35.880]  I sent by regular mail.
[01:09:35.880 --> 01:09:36.880]  Okay.
[01:09:36.880 --> 01:09:38.880]  Well, that's mistake number one.
[01:09:38.880 --> 01:09:43.880]  You don't ever send anything to any government agency unless it's certified mail return
[01:09:43.880 --> 01:09:46.880]  receipt requested or registered mail.
[01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:47.880]  Okay.
[01:09:47.880 --> 01:09:48.880]  All right.
[01:09:48.880 --> 01:09:53.880]  Because then you have no verifiable way to show that you ever made the communication
[01:09:53.880 --> 01:09:55.880]  in the first place.
[01:09:55.880 --> 01:09:56.880]  I see.
[01:09:56.880 --> 01:09:57.880]  Okay.
[01:09:57.880 --> 01:09:58.880]  Okay.
[01:09:58.880 --> 01:10:02.880]  Now, the other thing is how did you file the complaint?
[01:10:02.880 --> 01:10:06.880]  Did you do it in a letter or did you do it through some official medium or form?
[01:10:06.880 --> 01:10:13.880]  I did it through the official medium of filing a police report with the city that I was
[01:10:13.880 --> 01:10:14.880]  living in.
[01:10:14.880 --> 01:10:16.880]  The city has no jurisdiction over that.
[01:10:16.880 --> 01:10:20.880]  Filing a police report on a federal issue will get you absolutely nowhere.
[01:10:20.880 --> 01:10:25.880]  Uh-huh.
[01:10:25.880 --> 01:10:29.880]  The police have no authority over the United States mail.
[01:10:29.880 --> 01:10:34.880]  That is strictly a federal issue.
[01:10:34.880 --> 01:10:36.880]  Okay.
[01:10:36.880 --> 01:10:41.880]  The only time that will change is if you can show that someone took a check out of
[01:10:41.880 --> 01:10:48.880]  the mail and then it will involve both state and federal agencies.
[01:10:48.880 --> 01:10:53.880]  I see.
[01:10:53.880 --> 01:10:57.880]  Okay.
[01:10:57.880 --> 01:10:58.880]  All right.
[01:10:58.880 --> 01:11:03.880]  But now that we've got that part of it cleared up, what exactly is your question
[01:11:03.880 --> 01:11:05.880]  about what to be doing now?
[01:11:05.880 --> 01:11:12.880]  Well, I'm trying to, I really want to get my mother out from under this illegal
[01:11:12.880 --> 01:11:15.880]  guardianship.
[01:11:15.880 --> 01:11:16.880]  So I'm trying to-
[01:11:16.880 --> 01:11:20.880]  Well, when you say an illegal guardianship, please elaborate.
[01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:23.880]  What's illegal and who has guardianship?
[01:11:23.880 --> 01:11:28.880]  The guardianship commenced with the stolen mail, which because-
[01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:29.880]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:11:29.880 --> 01:11:32.880]  A piece of stolen mail does not transfer guardianship.
[01:11:32.880 --> 01:11:36.880]  Who are you saying has guardianship?
[01:11:36.880 --> 01:11:40.880]  The New Jersey Office of the Public Guardian.
[01:11:40.880 --> 01:11:42.880]  And they got it how?
[01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:48.880]  They got it because my brother started this litigation in court to stop me from
[01:11:48.880 --> 01:11:51.880]  moving mother to the West Coast for help.
[01:11:51.880 --> 01:11:53.880]  Litigation still won't give them guardianship.
[01:11:53.880 --> 01:12:00.880]  Someone had to file either an injunctive order or a court order remanding your
[01:12:00.880 --> 01:12:03.880]  mother to their custody for them to get guardianship.
[01:12:03.880 --> 01:12:05.880]  Has that been done?
[01:12:05.880 --> 01:12:12.880]  My brother filed the incompetence hearing and as a result the guardian was assigned
[01:12:12.880 --> 01:12:16.880]  and the power of attorney I think has been set aside, but I don't know if it's
[01:12:16.880 --> 01:12:18.880]  been invalidated.
[01:12:18.880 --> 01:12:22.880]  It can't be set aside or invalidated unless it can be proved it was a fraudulent
[01:12:22.880 --> 01:12:25.880]  instrument to begin with.
[01:12:25.880 --> 01:12:27.880]  It was never proven that.
[01:12:27.880 --> 01:12:32.880]  Has there been a hearing on the validity of the power of attorney?
[01:12:32.880 --> 01:12:35.880]  There was and it was allowed to stay.
[01:12:35.880 --> 01:12:42.880]  The reason that my mother, I lost the power of attorney was because of the fact
[01:12:42.880 --> 01:12:47.880]  that in August of 2004 we were in court.
[01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:55.880]  They asked me to produce documentation for the mortgage that stood under my
[01:12:55.880 --> 01:13:00.880]  mother because she was a trustee of the trust that my father had left because
[01:13:00.880 --> 01:13:03.880]  it's a complicated situation.
[01:13:03.880 --> 01:13:07.880]  But my father and mother divorced and never remarried so they were joint tenants
[01:13:07.880 --> 01:13:12.880]  in common but there was a trust allowing her use of the house of which I would
[01:13:12.880 --> 01:13:14.880]  be administrated.
[01:13:14.880 --> 01:13:20.880]  I ended up taking out a mortgage because my older brother was a contractor and
[01:13:20.880 --> 01:13:25.880]  he let my mother's house fall into disrepair so much so there were stairs that
[01:13:25.880 --> 01:13:31.880]  would have possibly been to her detriment if they were allowed to go on any
[01:13:31.880 --> 01:13:32.880]  further.
[01:13:32.880 --> 01:13:37.880]  I ended up doing the repairs that were necessary to bring the house back up to
[01:13:37.880 --> 01:13:38.880]  code.
[01:13:38.880 --> 01:13:41.880]  I spent about $80,000 then doing so.
[01:13:41.880 --> 01:13:46.880]  In the process of doing that we took out a mortgage but during the process of
[01:13:46.880 --> 01:13:50.880]  taking care of my mother I had no one helping me and I had no rest or care.
[01:13:50.880 --> 01:13:58.880]  So the trial began, the emergency hearing was set for April 15, 2004 but they
[01:13:58.880 --> 01:14:00.880]  asked me to do an accounting.
[01:14:00.880 --> 01:14:04.880]  I said I will do an accounting but I just need some rest or care.
[01:14:04.880 --> 01:14:06.880]  They never gave me a rest or care.
[01:14:06.880 --> 01:14:11.880]  I asked the attorney, in fact the last attorney that I ended up, one of the last
[01:14:11.880 --> 01:14:15.880]  attorneys I ended up having, I asked her to arrange rest or care with my brother
[01:14:15.880 --> 01:14:17.880]  which it never happened.
[01:14:17.880 --> 01:14:20.880]  After three weeks of trying with the attorney I just gave up.
[01:14:20.880 --> 01:14:25.880]  I released the attorney, found one other attorney but he ended up not doing
[01:14:25.880 --> 01:14:27.880]  anything.
[01:14:27.880 --> 01:14:30.880]  Okay, this care that you're talking about, what is that?
[01:14:30.880 --> 01:14:36.880]  The care was that I was my mother's companion and health proxy so I was there
[01:14:36.880 --> 01:14:41.880]  to look after her, make sure she took her medications, you know, if she had
[01:14:41.880 --> 01:14:46.880]  accidents during the day.
[01:14:46.880 --> 01:14:49.880]  Okay, so you were looking for some supervised care for your mother while you
[01:14:49.880 --> 01:14:51.880]  were trying to comply with what the court wanted.
[01:14:51.880 --> 01:14:53.880]  Exactly.
[01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:58.880]  Okay, how did that responsibility fall upon the court to provide or your
[01:14:58.880 --> 01:14:59.880]  attorneys for that matter?
[01:14:59.880 --> 01:15:04.880]  Well, no, I was trying to demonstrate to the court that my brother had no
[01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:08.880]  particular interest in my mother because he wasn't willing to do the job.
[01:15:08.880 --> 01:15:12.880]  All I was asking for was just a little bit of rest or care because I haven't
[01:15:12.880 --> 01:15:15.880]  had a day off in three years.
[01:15:15.880 --> 01:15:19.880]  And so I was asking for rest or care so that I could devote my attention to
[01:15:19.880 --> 01:15:24.880]  putting the financial affairs together to get the documents together.
[01:15:24.880 --> 01:15:28.880]  When I finally did get the documents together, the mortgage documents together,
[01:15:28.880 --> 01:15:33.880]  the minute I turned my back for a minute to go to the restroom, my mother, who
[01:15:33.880 --> 01:15:37.880]  was still ambulatory and able to move around, ended up destroying some of the
[01:15:37.880 --> 01:15:38.880]  papers.
[01:15:38.880 --> 01:15:42.880]  Now, I know that sounds far-fetched but that's exactly what happened.
[01:15:42.880 --> 01:15:44.880]  When we went to court, I explained the story.
[01:15:44.880 --> 01:15:47.880]  I told them it's not that I'm hiding anything and I'm willing to get them
[01:15:47.880 --> 01:15:52.880]  right away, but because I've had nobody to help me take care of my mother, you
[01:15:52.880 --> 01:15:55.880]  know, this is what I've had to deal with.
[01:15:55.880 --> 01:15:59.880]  Well, the court felt that I was a bad fiduciary.
[01:15:59.880 --> 01:16:05.880]  And because I was trying to get my mother to the West Coast to start life out
[01:16:05.880 --> 01:16:11.880]  here, they said that it would be better if she were put under a public
[01:16:11.880 --> 01:16:12.880]  guardian.
[01:16:12.880 --> 01:16:19.880]  So we, it ended up, the judge ended up taking the guardianship from the power
[01:16:19.880 --> 01:16:23.880]  of attorney for me and setting it aside and assigning my mother to the office
[01:16:23.880 --> 01:16:24.880]  of the public guardian.
[01:16:24.880 --> 01:16:28.880]  And from there, it's just been a nightmare ever since because literally I've
[01:16:28.880 --> 01:16:32.880]  been shut out of my mother's life.
[01:16:32.880 --> 01:16:33.880]  Okay.
[01:16:33.880 --> 01:16:34.880]  Well, hang on just a second, Jay.
[01:16:34.880 --> 01:16:36.880]  We're going to have to wrap this up on the other side.
[01:16:36.880 --> 01:16:40.880]  We've had you on for a whole segment here, but we'll try to get this wrapped up
[01:16:40.880 --> 01:16:42.880]  real quick in the next segment.
[01:16:42.880 --> 01:16:43.880]  Folks, if you'll hang on just a moment.
[01:16:43.880 --> 01:16:44.880]  Dan, hang on.
[01:16:44.880 --> 01:16:45.880]  I see you on the board there.
[01:16:45.880 --> 01:16:47.880]  I'll get to you momentarily.
[01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:51.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[01:16:51.880 --> 01:16:56.880]  We have approximately 45 minutes left in the show, so give us a call,
[01:16:56.880 --> 01:17:00.880]  512-646-1984.
[01:17:00.880 --> 01:17:05.880]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals,
[01:17:05.880 --> 01:17:08.880]  and coin supplies in the Austin metro area.
[01:17:08.880 --> 01:17:10.880]  We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:10.880 --> 01:17:14.880]  We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on
[01:17:14.880 --> 01:17:16.880]  your coin and metals purchases.
[01:17:16.880 --> 01:17:21.880]  We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections,
[01:17:21.880 --> 01:17:23.880]  precious metals, and scrap gold.
[01:17:23.880 --> 01:17:26.880]  We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well.
[01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:29.880]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion.
[01:17:29.880 --> 01:17:35.880]  We're located at 5448 Barnett Road, Suite 3, and we're open Monday through Friday,
[01:17:35.880 --> 01:17:39.880]  10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[01:17:39.880 --> 01:17:42.880]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours or call
[01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:47.880]  512-646-6440 with any questions.
[01:17:47.880 --> 01:17:52.880]  Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM.
[01:17:52.880 --> 01:17:59.880]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440.
[01:17:59.880 --> 01:18:04.880]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet
[01:18:04.880 --> 01:18:08.880]  isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:18:08.880 --> 01:18:11.880]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:18:11.880 --> 01:18:12.880]  Brave New Books?
[01:18:12.880 --> 01:18:16.880]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors
[01:18:16.880 --> 01:18:19.880]  like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:18:19.880 --> 01:18:23.880]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:18:23.880 --> 01:18:26.880]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:18:26.880 --> 01:18:27.880]  Go check it out for yourself.
[01:18:27.880 --> 01:18:31.880]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:35.880]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:18:35.880 --> 01:18:38.880]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers
[01:18:38.880 --> 01:18:42.880]  at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:18:42.880 --> 01:18:46.880]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:18:46.880 --> 01:18:51.880]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[01:18:51.880 --> 01:18:55.880]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[01:18:55.880 --> 01:19:02.880]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:19:02.880 --> 01:19:04.880]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:04.880 --> 01:19:31.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:31.880 --> 01:19:36.880]  Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[01:19:36.880 --> 01:19:41.880]  Okay, we have a few more people up on the call board right now.
[01:19:41.880 --> 01:19:44.880]  So let's get with them and see what we've got.
[01:19:44.880 --> 01:19:48.880]  Now, let's finish up with Jay.
[01:19:48.880 --> 01:19:52.880]  All right, Jay, let's see if we can get you wrapped up in five minutes or less, please.
[01:19:52.880 --> 01:19:53.880]  Okay.
[01:19:53.880 --> 01:19:57.880]  So basically, what I've been trying to, what I've been asserting from the whole beginning
[01:19:57.880 --> 01:20:02.880]  is that I've been now questioning the jurisdiction of the court to proceed.
[01:20:02.880 --> 01:20:08.880]  So what I'm looking at is the fact of the matter that because we started with stolen mail,
[01:20:08.880 --> 01:20:14.880]  I'm now looking at a judge who doesn't recognize ADA law or anything else like that.
[01:20:14.880 --> 01:20:19.880]  So I was thinking of maybe submitting a motion to disqualify,
[01:20:19.880 --> 01:20:25.880]  something that would cause him not to be able to respond himself,
[01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:33.880]  but that would have to be reviewed by another judge, his superior.
[01:20:33.880 --> 01:20:39.880]  Well, it's possible, but you have to have some reason to show why you're recusing this judge.
[01:20:39.880 --> 01:20:46.880]  If you can show that he is doing something outside of his discretionary authority in the law,
[01:20:46.880 --> 01:20:57.880]  in other words, violating a ministerial or magisterial duty or somehow creating a conflict of interest
[01:20:57.880 --> 01:21:03.880]  or that he is somehow involved in under-the-table dealings with someone
[01:21:03.880 --> 01:21:06.880]  to ensure that this case stays where it is and how it is,
[01:21:06.880 --> 01:21:11.880]  those are the issues that's going to get you a disqualification or recusal.
[01:21:11.880 --> 01:21:17.880]  But if it's just a simple matter of I don't like him, I don't like how he's making me do things,
[01:21:17.880 --> 01:21:21.880]  that's not going to do you any good. In fact, it's going to hurt you.
[01:21:21.880 --> 01:21:26.880]  No, I was looking at the fact of the matter that I've written him several times
[01:21:26.880 --> 01:21:31.880]  about violations of court orders and he has not responded to me.
[01:21:31.880 --> 01:21:38.880]  So I was going to look at the fact that the judge is either unwilling, biased, or incompetent
[01:21:38.880 --> 01:21:46.880]  because he has not responded to my claims of abuse nor the fruit of the poison tree.
[01:21:46.880 --> 01:21:55.880]  And so in so doing, by not acknowledging any of my correspondence to that point of law,
[01:21:55.880 --> 01:22:05.880]  then I'm saying that either you're incompetent, either you're unwilling or you're unable to do your job.
[01:22:05.880 --> 01:22:10.880]  But what do you have that you can use to show that?
[01:22:10.880 --> 01:22:17.880]  The accusation alone is not enough. You have to have something substantive to base it on. What is it?
[01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:25.880]  On September 2007, that requires the monthly compliance by the Office of the Public Guardian.
[01:22:25.880 --> 01:22:31.880]  I spoke to the judge. I have a court record where I took a court reporter with me
[01:22:31.880 --> 01:22:36.880]  and I told the judge of the problem. I filed several motions.
[01:22:36.880 --> 01:22:42.880]  Does the judge have the authority to correct that problem or is that something the department itself has to do?
[01:22:42.880 --> 01:22:49.880]  He has the authority to correct and also to sanction because I asked for sanctions because this is important.
[01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:54.880]  This is the basic communication with my mother by phone.
[01:22:54.880 --> 01:22:59.880]  But he has discretionary power over whether or not to impose a sanction.
[01:22:59.880 --> 01:23:05.880]  And he cannot be questioned in a discretionary power.
[01:23:05.880 --> 01:23:13.880]  You have to be able to show that he used his discretion to commit a direct violation of law.
[01:23:13.880 --> 01:23:17.880]  That's what I'm saying. It can't be an argument that you think he should have done this
[01:23:17.880 --> 01:23:23.880]  when the law gives him the discretion to do one or the other.
[01:23:23.880 --> 01:23:25.880]  You see the problem?
[01:23:25.880 --> 01:23:35.880]  I do. Okay. That means I have to look at this again to see where he has violated the law
[01:23:35.880 --> 01:23:38.880]  that I have to hold within the confines of the law.
[01:23:38.880 --> 01:23:44.880]  If the law says that he must or he shall do something and he failed to do it,
[01:23:44.880 --> 01:23:52.880]  now he's committed a ministerial duty violation. He can be challenged and held accountable on that.
[01:23:52.880 --> 01:24:00.880]  If it caused harm to you or your mother, then you can move to have him disqualified.
[01:24:00.880 --> 01:24:09.880]  But until you get something of that nature, it's just a I don't like him accusation and they're going to ignore it.
[01:24:09.880 --> 01:24:12.880]  Okay. Okay.
[01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:13.880]  Okay?
[01:24:13.880 --> 01:24:16.880]  Okay. So I have to look for the point of law.
[01:24:16.880 --> 01:24:21.880]  So the fruit of the poison tree is not enough.
[01:24:21.880 --> 01:24:24.880]  You have to prove the tree was poisoned.
[01:24:24.880 --> 01:24:30.880]  Until you do that, the accusation of fruit of a poison tree is not enough.
[01:24:30.880 --> 01:24:33.880]  Okay. Okay.
[01:24:33.880 --> 01:24:36.880]  You can't just say because it's got red leaves, it's poison.
[01:24:36.880 --> 01:24:39.880]  Because it gives purple fruit, it's poison.
[01:24:39.880 --> 01:24:45.880]  You have to show why and how you prove it's poison.
[01:24:45.880 --> 01:24:53.880]  Okay. All right. So basically I'm back to square one with the post office pursuing it down.
[01:24:53.880 --> 01:25:00.880]  Well, what your brother did outside of your mother's care is a different issue.
[01:25:00.880 --> 01:25:05.880]  The fact that he stole mail has nothing to do with the issue you're in.
[01:25:05.880 --> 01:25:09.880]  That's a separate and distinct charge on your brother.
[01:25:09.880 --> 01:25:15.880]  You still have to, regardless of that, you can't claim fruit of the poison tree information
[01:25:15.880 --> 01:25:21.880]  by something your brother disclosed, whether he was in lawful possession of it or not.
[01:25:21.880 --> 01:25:28.880]  If the court found, that's like saying your brother found out by illegal wiretapping
[01:25:28.880 --> 01:25:35.880]  that a murder was committed, but because he reported it, they can't prosecute.
[01:25:35.880 --> 01:25:40.880]  I'm not saying that's the case here, but I'm just giving you an example.
[01:25:40.880 --> 01:25:46.880]  Even though he did one illegal act and discovered another allegedly illegal act
[01:25:46.880 --> 01:25:50.880]  or something that gave him pause to believe it was an illegal act,
[01:25:50.880 --> 01:25:59.880]  that does not implicate the court or any other public servant from acting on what he reported.
[01:25:59.880 --> 01:26:08.880]  Okay. Is there no defense against phishing expeditions then when you have something like that?
[01:26:08.880 --> 01:26:14.880]  Sure, but if you have to prove it's a phishing expedition.
[01:26:14.880 --> 01:26:18.880]  What tangible evidence was in their possession when they initiated this?
[01:26:18.880 --> 01:26:25.880]  What probable cause existed? What cause of action existed?
[01:26:25.880 --> 01:26:35.880]  If there wasn't any, then how did this begin? But from what you've described, your brother gave them one.
[01:26:35.880 --> 01:26:40.880]  The court didn't go phishing. The system didn't go phishing.
[01:26:40.880 --> 01:26:44.880]  Someone made an accusation and they acted on it.
[01:26:44.880 --> 01:26:53.880]  Well, he made the accusation of undue influence with the presentation of the stolen checking account document.
[01:26:53.880 --> 01:27:04.880]  That may be the case, but the stolen documents have nothing to do with what was found after the accusation was made.
[01:27:04.880 --> 01:27:11.880]  They ordered you to produce documents which you did or failed to do in a particular case.
[01:27:11.880 --> 01:27:18.880]  The court then made a determination based upon that as to whether or not they thought you were doing what they asked you to,
[01:27:18.880 --> 01:27:21.880]  were not doing what they asked you to, or were trying to hide something.
[01:27:21.880 --> 01:27:28.880]  They're completely separate, distinct issues.
[01:27:28.880 --> 01:27:33.880]  You know, when we as citizens go before court, sometimes we're overwhelmed.
[01:27:33.880 --> 01:27:39.880]  And it's hard when you have lawyers that don't work for you but work against you.
[01:27:39.880 --> 01:27:44.880]  I agree with that, but that's still not your issue here, at least not in its entirety.
[01:27:44.880 --> 01:27:50.880]  You'd have a complaint against the lawyer if they did that. That doesn't mean the court is held guilty for it.
[01:27:50.880 --> 01:27:54.880]  Okay. Okay.
[01:27:54.880 --> 01:27:55.880]  Okay?
[01:27:55.880 --> 01:27:57.880]  All right. Well, I mean, I...
[01:27:57.880 --> 01:27:58.880]  Okay.
[01:27:58.880 --> 01:28:05.880]  Well, hopefully this will give you something to read up on and research and see if you can go back and find the threads you need to make this unravel in your favor.
[01:28:05.880 --> 01:28:07.880]  All right. Thank you.
[01:28:07.880 --> 01:28:09.880]  Okay. But in the meantime, thanks for calling in.
[01:28:09.880 --> 01:28:10.880]  Thank you.
[01:28:10.880 --> 01:28:11.880]  You're welcome.
[01:28:11.880 --> 01:28:16.880]  All right. Dan in Connecticut. Hi, Dan. Sorry for the wait. What can we do for you?
[01:28:16.880 --> 01:28:22.880]  Oh, nothing much. It's actually more of a question of what can I do for you and the other listeners tonight?
[01:28:22.880 --> 01:28:26.880]  Well, I don't know, Dan. Give us a hint.
[01:28:26.880 --> 01:28:40.880]  Well, first of all, I just want to say that in participating in this whole exercise throughout the last three years as I have, it's really a question of reading the law that applies.
[01:28:40.880 --> 01:28:55.880]  The one complaint that I have when people call in is they haven't particularly thought out what the narrative is as to what has happened, you know, in A to Z chronological order as to what has occurred.
[01:28:55.880 --> 01:29:02.880]  Not when they've thought, not as they've thought about it, you know, or what their feelings were, but just what happened.
[01:29:02.880 --> 01:29:16.880]  That's the first, that's the most important aspect. And second of all, the other complaint is that, you know, when I have this, that people haven't called in, they haven't looked up the law.
[01:29:16.880 --> 01:29:22.880]  And it really, it's a question of, you know, can you understand it?
[01:29:22.880 --> 01:29:36.880]  It's always written in English, which, you know, I'd always recommend that people just go ahead and just read the law clean and not try to, you know, look at things.
[01:29:36.880 --> 01:29:40.880]  But I hear the music, so we're going to go into the second, obviously.
[01:29:40.880 --> 01:29:44.880]  Yes. So if you'll hang on just a minute, Dan, I'll pick you up on the other side of the break, okay?
[01:29:44.880 --> 01:29:46.880]  Okay.
[01:29:46.880 --> 01:29:53.880]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:59.880]  We have a half an hour left, so if you've got an issue, please give us a call. We will be right back.
[01:29:59.880 --> 01:30:03.880]  Top ten reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing, reason number five.
[01:30:03.880 --> 01:30:09.880]  As witnessed by millions of viewers, the rescue efforts were interrupted several times due to the presence of other explosives.
[01:30:09.880 --> 01:30:18.880]  Government log entries indicate and witnesses report that after the initial devastating blast, a bomb complete with timer was discovered and removed from wreckage by the bomb squad.
[01:30:18.880 --> 01:30:21.880]  Yet we are told it's all due to baseless bomb scares or other contrivances.
[01:30:21.880 --> 01:30:28.880]  So while officials try to sort out their stories, all we ask is who planted these bombs and why is the government lying about them?
[01:30:28.880 --> 01:30:32.880]  For more information, go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:32.880 --> 01:30:39.880]  If you shop online, chances are a vendor is sizing you up and setting prices according to what they think you'll pay.
[01:30:39.880 --> 01:30:46.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with some tips to protect yourself from discriminatory pricing.
[01:30:46.880 --> 01:30:51.880]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:51.880 --> 01:30:56.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:56.880 --> 01:31:04.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:04.880 --> 01:31:11.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:11.880 --> 01:31:15.880]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:31:15.880 --> 01:31:19.880]  Internet retailers are hunting for easy prey in the online jungle.
[01:31:19.880 --> 01:31:25.880]  Without warning, they might charge you more than another customer for the exact same item based on your web browser and visit history.
[01:31:25.880 --> 01:31:30.880]  Capital One Bank reportedly charges higher interest rates to Firefox users.
[01:31:30.880 --> 01:31:37.880]  And Amazon got caught raising prices based on buyer cookies, code stored on people's computer that linked to their purchase history.
[01:31:37.880 --> 01:31:40.880]  While this is infuriating, it's perfectly legal.
[01:31:40.880 --> 01:31:46.880]  Your best defense is to delete cookies, shop around for the best price, make notes, and take your sweet time.
[01:31:46.880 --> 01:31:52.880]  And before you make a large purchase, you may want to have someone else check the deal using a different computer and browser.
[01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:57.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:22.880 --> 01:32:25.880]  We're all.
[01:32:25.880 --> 01:32:28.880]  They come from.
[01:32:28.880 --> 01:32:32.880]  Let's get.
[01:32:32.880 --> 01:32:35.880]  To.
[01:32:35.880 --> 01:32:38.880]  Rebuild.
[01:32:38.880 --> 01:32:41.880]  And I say.
[01:32:41.880 --> 01:32:44.880]  Justice.
[01:32:44.880 --> 01:32:47.880]  Truth.
[01:32:47.880 --> 01:32:50.880]  Justice.
[01:32:50.880 --> 01:32:53.880]  And I.
[01:32:53.880 --> 01:32:56.880]  I.
[01:32:56.880 --> 01:32:59.880]  I.
[01:32:59.880 --> 01:33:02.880]  I.
[01:33:02.880 --> 01:33:05.880]  I.
[01:33:05.880 --> 01:33:08.880]  I.
[01:33:08.880 --> 01:33:11.880]  I.
[01:33:11.880 --> 01:33:14.880]  I.
[01:33:14.880 --> 01:33:17.880]  I.
[01:33:17.880 --> 01:33:20.880]  I.
[01:33:20.880 --> 01:33:23.880]  I.
[01:33:23.880 --> 01:33:26.880]  I.
[01:33:26.880 --> 01:33:29.880]  I.
[01:33:29.880 --> 01:33:32.880]  I.
[01:33:32.880 --> 01:33:35.880]  I.
[01:33:35.880 --> 01:33:38.880]  I.
[01:33:38.880 --> 01:33:41.880]  I.
[01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:47.880]  I'll please bear with me here just a second. I'm having to switch around between things as we go.
[01:33:47.880 --> 01:33:50.880]  OK, let's finish up with Dan. All right, Dan, go ahead, please.
[01:33:50.880 --> 01:34:01.880]  OK, I'm going to finish up as quickly as I can. But the bottom line is on statute, just go ahead and read all the codes and statutes that you think apply to you.
[01:34:01.880 --> 01:34:07.880]  And if you don't know what they are or nobody's made it clear to you, ask. I mean, it couldn't hurt.
[01:34:07.880 --> 01:34:11.880]  I mean, after all, everybody needs to know what they're talking about.
[01:34:11.880 --> 01:34:16.880]  Second of all, I heard a few callers talking about attorney conduct.
[01:34:16.880 --> 01:34:23.880]  I know in Connecticut that's defined by the Connecticut Journal of Practice book. The rules are in there and they're very clear.
[01:34:23.880 --> 01:34:34.880]  And if you want to file a bar grievance, those are actually in the Connecticut Journal of Practice book as far as what attorney is supposed to do and what attorney is not supposed to do.
[01:34:34.880 --> 01:34:47.880]  As far as child cases go, I can tell you from experience, I've seen a lot of cases where, you know, the bottom line came down to, are the parents afraid to do something or are they not?
[01:34:47.880 --> 01:34:53.880]  And I know as far as what Randy said about a lot of things that apply to criminal cases, it's true.
[01:34:53.880 --> 01:35:02.880]  They're going to do the worst possible thing that they can to you, you know, that they would anyway. So it couldn't hurt to just fight back.
[01:35:02.880 --> 01:35:10.880]  And as a matter of fact, I've actually talked to, you know, state police in the People's Republic of Connecticut of all places.
[01:35:10.880 --> 01:35:16.880]  They were willing to arrest some of these people that were doing things outside the law.
[01:35:16.880 --> 01:35:19.880]  So it's really a matter of the parents fighting back.
[01:35:19.880 --> 01:35:27.880]  And the last thing that I was going to mention, I have a little project concerning Randy's Brady motion.
[01:35:27.880 --> 01:35:35.880]  Now, I have modifications for this Brady motion that he originally wrote for Texas.
[01:35:35.880 --> 01:35:39.880]  I have versions for Connecticut and I have another version for New Hampshire.
[01:35:39.880 --> 01:35:50.880]  If anybody wants a different modified copy of this version of the Brady motion, they can email me at headlinecopy at gml.com.
[01:35:50.880 --> 01:36:00.880]  That's H-E-A-D-L-I-N-E-C-O-P-Y at gml.com.
[01:36:00.880 --> 01:36:04.880]  And I will be more than happy to make a different version for their state.
[01:36:04.880 --> 01:36:14.880]  And from my own personal experience, I can say this is absolutely terrified prosecutors in a whole bunch of different jurisdictions.
[01:36:14.880 --> 01:36:22.880]  So if you want me to make a copy for your state and your jurisdiction, just send me an email and let me know what's going on.
[01:36:22.880 --> 01:36:23.880]  All right, Dan.
[01:36:23.880 --> 01:36:26.880]  Well, that sounds like a reasonable offer, folks.
[01:36:26.880 --> 01:36:30.880]  So if you need one for your state, get in touch with Dan and he'll hook you up.
[01:36:30.880 --> 01:36:31.880]  Appreciate it a whole lot, Dan.
[01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:32.880]  Anything else?
[01:36:32.880 --> 01:36:33.880]  Yeah.
[01:36:33.880 --> 01:36:37.880]  And the goal is I want one copy for every state.
[01:36:37.880 --> 01:36:44.880]  So that way, you don't just have to go to juristhenprudence.com and download your own copy.
[01:36:44.880 --> 01:36:46.880]  This is completely open source, obviously.
[01:36:46.880 --> 01:36:48.880]  Obviously, it's not legal advice.
[01:36:48.880 --> 01:36:52.880]  And the Brady motion is just a generic discovery request.
[01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:55.880]  It's just a simple, you know, inquiry.
[01:36:55.880 --> 01:36:57.880]  What are we talking about?
[01:36:57.880 --> 01:37:07.880]  And the Brady motion, as Randy wrote it for Texas, was kind of like, hey, here's the list of everything we could possibly be looking at.
[01:37:07.880 --> 01:37:09.880]  And it's not unreasonable.
[01:37:09.880 --> 01:37:13.880]  If some things don't apply, then, well, that's fair enough.
[01:37:13.880 --> 01:37:23.880]  But at least after you go through the entire list of requests, you know, you kind of know what we're looking at.
[01:37:23.880 --> 01:37:31.880]  So there's really no question and, you know, going on from there, everybody knows what everybody else is looking at.
[01:37:31.880 --> 01:37:32.880]  Okay.
[01:37:32.880 --> 01:37:34.880]  Sounds like a heck of an offer.
[01:37:34.880 --> 01:37:36.880]  All right, Dan, we appreciate it very much.
[01:37:36.880 --> 01:37:41.880]  And folks, if you need the – Dan, go ahead and give them the email address one more time.
[01:37:41.880 --> 01:37:44.880]  That would be headlinecopy at gmail.com.
[01:37:44.880 --> 01:37:51.880]  That's h-e-a-d-l-i-n-e at gmail.com.
[01:37:51.880 --> 01:37:53.880]  All right.
[01:37:53.880 --> 01:37:54.880]  All right.
[01:37:54.880 --> 01:37:57.880]  Thank you much.
[01:37:57.880 --> 01:37:58.880]  All right.
[01:37:58.880 --> 01:37:59.880]  We have Sheldon in South Carolina.
[01:37:59.880 --> 01:38:02.880]  Sheldon, what can we do for you?
[01:38:02.880 --> 01:38:03.880]  Yeah.
[01:38:03.880 --> 01:38:04.880]  Excuse me.
[01:38:04.880 --> 01:38:06.880]  I was listening to a guy earlier.
[01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:09.880]  And he said something about the conflict of interest.
[01:38:09.880 --> 01:38:13.880]  How would you address conflict of interest?
[01:38:13.880 --> 01:38:20.880]  Well, that really depends upon what the issue is that causes the conflict to arise.
[01:38:20.880 --> 01:38:24.880]  There's numerous ways for someone to have a conflict of interest,
[01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:29.880]  and the necessity on how to fix that's going to depend upon who that someone is
[01:38:29.880 --> 01:38:34.880]  and what the situation they're involved in is.
[01:38:34.880 --> 01:38:37.880]  So can you be a little more specific with your question?
[01:38:37.880 --> 01:38:43.880]  Judges in South Carolina quick to say these are my officers.
[01:38:43.880 --> 01:38:45.880]  This is my court.
[01:38:45.880 --> 01:38:52.880]  So technically, if their office is giving you a ticket, then there's a conflict of interest.
[01:38:52.880 --> 01:38:57.880]  Well, their office doesn't give you the ticket, though, do they?
[01:38:57.880 --> 01:38:58.880]  No, that's right.
[01:38:58.880 --> 01:38:59.880]  They say they're officers.
[01:38:59.880 --> 01:39:00.880]  They're my police.
[01:39:00.880 --> 01:39:01.880]  These are my police.
[01:39:01.880 --> 01:39:05.880]  These are my officers.
[01:39:05.880 --> 01:39:07.880]  Okay.
[01:39:07.880 --> 01:39:12.880]  How does their saying that actually make it true?
[01:39:12.880 --> 01:39:13.880]  By them saying it in open court.
[01:39:13.880 --> 01:39:17.880]  I mean, they're saying that there's a conflict of interest.
[01:39:17.880 --> 01:39:21.880]  Well, then challenge it on that ground when they say it in open court.
[01:39:21.880 --> 01:39:23.880]  In open court, give them a response.
[01:39:23.880 --> 01:39:24.880]  Objection.
[01:39:24.880 --> 01:39:27.880]  That I've been charged and am being tried by the same entity.
[01:39:27.880 --> 01:39:32.880]  If these are your officers.
[01:39:32.880 --> 01:39:33.880]  Okay.
[01:39:33.880 --> 01:39:35.880]  That's about what I was getting at.
[01:39:35.880 --> 01:39:39.880]  And the other question was I had a guy, he walked by my car the other day,
[01:39:39.880 --> 01:39:44.880]  he was listening to me, he was listening to the radio show.
[01:39:44.880 --> 01:39:50.880]  He asked a question about how would you address your constitutional right to bear arms?
[01:39:50.880 --> 01:39:56.880]  And I was telling him that we do not have to bear arms to go out and harm each other there for the politicians.
[01:39:56.880 --> 01:39:59.880]  And he said, well, how do you address that?
[01:39:59.880 --> 01:40:03.880]  I mean, you know, because they're telling him he has a felony, some small felony,
[01:40:03.880 --> 01:40:08.880]  he can't get a firearm now, and he said he had a constitutional right, how would he address that?
[01:40:08.880 --> 01:40:14.880]  Well, if he's convicted of a felony, the way it is supposed to work, personal opinion,
[01:40:14.880 --> 01:40:21.880]  is that once you serve time for the felony, they don't have the right to continue to punish you.
[01:40:21.880 --> 01:40:28.880]  Now, had he been convicted of using a firearm against someone repeatedly
[01:40:28.880 --> 01:40:33.880]  or was considered to be such a threat within possession of one,
[01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:40.880]  then that right can be permanently removed from him because he is a danger to society
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:44.880]  if he has a weapon in his hands.
[01:40:44.880 --> 01:40:51.880]  But just because one is convicted of a particular act that did not involve a firearm
[01:40:51.880 --> 01:40:58.880]  should not in any way affect other vested rights not related to the act for which you're convicted.
[01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:01.880]  That's my personal opinion.
[01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:07.880]  They're actually attempting to punish you above and beyond what is needed
[01:41:07.880 --> 01:41:12.880]  for the alleged crime you were convicted of.
[01:41:12.880 --> 01:41:22.880]  So by attempting to remove multiple rights that are not related, I find that a very serious issue.
[01:41:22.880 --> 01:41:26.880]  And I don't see anywhere that we the people granted that power
[01:41:26.880 --> 01:41:31.880]  and authority to any governmental agency or entity.
[01:41:31.880 --> 01:41:39.880]  But we the people have acquiesced to it out of that need to feel safe.
[01:41:39.880 --> 01:41:43.880]  And so it's become societal policy to allow that to continue.
[01:41:43.880 --> 01:41:48.880]  I disagree with it, but I'm one guy.
[01:41:48.880 --> 01:41:53.880]  I can scream from the top of every hill and every radio tower in the country,
[01:41:53.880 --> 01:41:57.880]  but until everybody else stands up and screams with me
[01:41:57.880 --> 01:42:02.880]  or at least a huge number of them stand up and scream with me,
[01:42:02.880 --> 01:42:06.880]  I can't affect the change, not by myself.
[01:42:06.880 --> 01:42:08.880]  I've got to motivate others.
[01:42:08.880 --> 01:42:10.880]  So that's what you're going to have to do.
[01:42:10.880 --> 01:42:14.880]  That's what the gentleman you're speaking of is going to have to do.
[01:42:14.880 --> 01:42:15.880]  Yes.
[01:42:15.880 --> 01:42:34.880]  You can bring it up in court as a form of judicial notice.
[01:42:34.880 --> 01:42:39.880]  Any time that you can show something to the court that is incontrovertible,
[01:42:39.880 --> 01:42:45.880]  in other words, they can't say it's not true and there's no evidence to the contrary
[01:42:45.880 --> 01:42:50.880]  and it is commonly accepted as being true.
[01:42:50.880 --> 01:42:53.880]  If you preface its introduction with,
[01:42:53.880 --> 01:42:59.880]  I hereby demand the court or request the court to take judicial notice of,
[01:42:59.880 --> 01:43:06.880]  then you cite your constitutional article or your statutory section
[01:43:06.880 --> 01:43:13.880]  and introduce it into the court in its entirety where it stipulates such and such language.
[01:43:13.880 --> 01:43:17.880]  At that point, you can provide a copy of that to the court,
[01:43:17.880 --> 01:43:22.880]  to the opposing counsel and to the jury to see.
[01:43:22.880 --> 01:43:29.880]  They don't like it when you do that because that makes the jury more informed.
[01:43:29.880 --> 01:43:35.880]  They don't like the jury to be informed when they're trying to convict somebody of something.
[01:43:35.880 --> 01:43:37.880]  Thank you very much for being here for me.
[01:43:37.880 --> 01:43:39.880]  I love talking with you.
[01:43:39.880 --> 01:43:41.880]  All right, Sheldon, thank you for calling in.
[01:43:41.880 --> 01:43:43.880]  Okay, bye-bye.
[01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:44.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:43:44.880 --> 01:43:47.880]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[01:43:47.880 --> 01:43:48.880]  Don't leave me hanging.
[01:43:48.880 --> 01:43:50.880]  The call board is now empty.
[01:43:50.880 --> 01:43:52.880]  If you have an issue, give us a call.
[01:43:52.880 --> 01:43:55.880]  Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:55.880 --> 01:44:05.880]  We will be right back.
[01:44:25.880 --> 01:44:30.880]  The science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component,
[01:44:30.880 --> 01:44:36.880]  and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:44:36.880 --> 01:44:40.880]  Plus, centrician tastes great in just water.
[01:44:40.880 --> 01:44:46.880]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:44:46.880 --> 01:44:55.880]  Visit centrician.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:44:55.880 --> 01:45:00.880]  After you use centrician, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:45:00.880 --> 01:45:03.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.880 --> 01:45:07.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable,
[01:45:07.880 --> 01:45:14.880]  easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.880 --> 01:45:18.880]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.880 --> 01:45:22.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.880 --> 01:45:27.880]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.880 --> 01:45:33.880]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.880 --> 01:45:38.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.880 --> 01:45:42.880]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.880 --> 01:45:48.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:48.880 --> 01:45:51.880]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.880 --> 01:46:13.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.880 --> 01:46:26.880]  All right, folks, we are back, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:26.880 --> 01:46:30.880]  Okay, we do have another caller on the board before I get to him.
[01:46:30.880 --> 01:46:33.880]  Let me just say real quick, tomorrow at the seminar,
[01:46:33.880 --> 01:46:36.880]  everyone that plans on attending the seminar tomorrow,
[01:46:36.880 --> 01:46:39.880]  please go ahead and get me an email right now.
[01:46:39.880 --> 01:46:42.880]  I will send you what I have at this moment for tomorrow.
[01:46:42.880 --> 01:46:47.880]  It will not be 100% complete, but it will be complete enough for us to discuss it
[01:46:47.880 --> 01:46:49.880]  and get way into the subject.
[01:46:49.880 --> 01:46:56.880]  So please send me an email, Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com,
[01:46:56.880 --> 01:46:58.880]  and get that to me as quick as you can.
[01:46:58.880 --> 01:47:02.880]  And as soon as I get off the air tonight, I will round all those emails up
[01:47:02.880 --> 01:47:07.880]  and shoot everybody a copy of the material for tomorrow.
[01:47:07.880 --> 01:47:10.880]  Okay, now let's see.
[01:47:10.880 --> 01:47:13.880]  We have Mark in Wisconsin.
[01:47:13.880 --> 01:47:15.880]  Mark, what can we do for you?
[01:47:15.880 --> 01:47:24.880]  Hello, hey, I called in and said that domestic violence laws,
[01:47:24.880 --> 01:47:27.880]  you can't have a gun anymore, and I said that got overturned.
[01:47:27.880 --> 01:47:28.880]  It didn't actually get overturned.
[01:47:28.880 --> 01:47:31.880]  What's happening are local judges are throwing out any,
[01:47:31.880 --> 01:47:37.880]  some local judges are throwing out those charges, you know, when someone goes hunting,
[01:47:37.880 --> 01:47:43.880]  and they've got a domestic abuse case too, so you still got to be careful.
[01:47:43.880 --> 01:47:48.880]  And the other thing I wanted to mention is I went through the gun statutes here in Wisconsin,
[01:47:48.880 --> 01:47:56.880]  and it says, right in the statute, it says you must be convicted of a felony in Wisconsin
[01:47:56.880 --> 01:48:01.880]  or committed a felony in another state that would have been a felony in Wisconsin.
[01:48:01.880 --> 01:48:04.880]  And I know a guy I looked at, he showed me his case,
[01:48:04.880 --> 01:48:07.880]  and he was convicted of a gun crime in a different state
[01:48:07.880 --> 01:48:09.880]  that wouldn't have been a felony here in Wisconsin.
[01:48:09.880 --> 01:48:11.880]  What do you think about that, Eddie?
[01:48:11.880 --> 01:48:16.880]  I think he needs to challenge, if he's been harmed by Wisconsin over that conviction
[01:48:16.880 --> 01:48:22.880]  by denying him the right to own or buy a gun, that he should address that.
[01:48:22.880 --> 01:48:25.880]  Should he address that or should he just, he's not a hunter or anything,
[01:48:25.880 --> 01:48:28.880]  he just wants to keep a gun in his house legally.
[01:48:28.880 --> 01:48:30.880]  But according to the statute, he can,
[01:48:30.880 --> 01:48:33.880]  but I'm pretty sure they'll deny him a hunting license if he goes for one,
[01:48:33.880 --> 01:48:35.880]  but he doesn't really want one of those.
[01:48:35.880 --> 01:48:38.880]  Well, tell him to get one anyway as a test case.
[01:48:38.880 --> 01:48:41.880]  If they deny him, they harm him.
[01:48:41.880 --> 01:48:45.880]  If they harm him, then he has a cause of action as long as he takes it up.
[01:48:45.880 --> 01:48:51.880]  That way he can get an official determination that he has the right to do that in Wisconsin.
[01:48:51.880 --> 01:48:53.880]  Yeah, that's probably the safe way to go, huh?
[01:48:53.880 --> 01:48:59.880]  That's the most convenient route to ensure that they can't come back at him later.
[01:48:59.880 --> 01:49:04.880]  Now, they're probably going to deny him right at, you know, wherever he gets his license
[01:49:04.880 --> 01:49:09.880]  and say, you check that you've been convicted of a felony here.
[01:49:09.880 --> 01:49:13.880]  Well, that may be true, but he needs to get something.
[01:49:13.880 --> 01:49:17.880]  What I would do is go to whatever your Fish and Game Department is,
[01:49:17.880 --> 01:49:22.880]  whoever issues the hunting licenses directly, don't go to a convenience store and get it.
[01:49:22.880 --> 01:49:26.880]  Go directly to the agency and attempt to get the license.
[01:49:26.880 --> 01:49:30.880]  If they deny you, then get something in writing from them
[01:49:30.880 --> 01:49:34.880]  stating as to why you were denied, he was denied.
[01:49:34.880 --> 01:49:35.880]  All right.
[01:49:35.880 --> 01:49:38.880]  That would be the Department of Natural Resources here in Wisconsin.
[01:49:38.880 --> 01:49:39.880]  Okay.
[01:49:39.880 --> 01:49:42.880]  Yeah, here is the Department of Parks and Wildlife.
[01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:43.880]  Right.
[01:49:43.880 --> 01:49:46.880]  If you don't have anybody else on the line, I had a question.
[01:49:46.880 --> 01:49:50.880]  My wife sued someone in federal court and an attorney called today.
[01:49:50.880 --> 01:49:54.880]  He wasn't supposed to call because there's a cease order or a cease communication order,
[01:49:54.880 --> 01:49:56.880]  and that's a separate issue.
[01:49:56.880 --> 01:49:58.880]  I know how to take care of that.
[01:49:58.880 --> 01:50:00.880]  I could threaten him with it later on down the road.
[01:50:00.880 --> 01:50:03.880]  But she doesn't really want to talk to him.
[01:50:03.880 --> 01:50:08.880]  Is there a way she can sign power of attorney for litigation over that he'll listen to,
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:10.880]  or does that need to be filed with the court?
[01:50:10.880 --> 01:50:11.880]  You said it's your wife?
[01:50:11.880 --> 01:50:12.880]  Yeah.
[01:50:12.880 --> 01:50:13.880]  Okay.
[01:50:13.880 --> 01:50:16.880]  And is this a family debt or a personal debt?
[01:50:16.880 --> 01:50:18.880]  Personal.
[01:50:18.880 --> 01:50:25.880]  Well, when did she enter into it, before or after you got married?
[01:50:25.880 --> 01:50:27.880]  After.
[01:50:27.880 --> 01:50:28.880]  Okay.
[01:50:28.880 --> 01:50:34.880]  Then it's not necessarily personal, just because she is the only one named on it.
[01:50:34.880 --> 01:50:36.880]  Okay.
[01:50:36.880 --> 01:50:37.880]  All right.
[01:50:37.880 --> 01:50:40.880]  So I can talk to him if he's willing to talk?
[01:50:40.880 --> 01:50:46.880]  Oh, you can talk to him, and you can inform him that there is a cease and desist order against him for that purpose,
[01:50:46.880 --> 01:50:52.880]  and that if he does call again, then this will be his third offense against that order,
[01:50:52.880 --> 01:50:57.880]  and you will ensure that he doesn't get an opportunity to pursue a fourth.
[01:50:57.880 --> 01:51:02.880]  All right.
[01:51:02.880 --> 01:51:12.880]  Does anyone have any luck with that anymore, firing for, what do you call it, to represent their wives in court?
[01:51:12.880 --> 01:51:15.880]  Well, in this case, it's not a matter of you representing your wife.
[01:51:15.880 --> 01:51:23.880]  If you can show that it involves or affects your marriage as far as the collection process
[01:51:23.880 --> 01:51:28.880]  and the debt was brought into being after you were married,
[01:51:28.880 --> 01:51:33.880]  then generally they're not going to try to separate the two most of the time.
[01:51:33.880 --> 01:51:36.880]  So I would try that tact just to see.
[01:51:36.880 --> 01:51:44.880]  But in any case, you can file bar grievances against this guy for every call he's made
[01:51:44.880 --> 01:51:51.880]  and every call he does make for violating a judicial injunction.
[01:51:51.880 --> 01:51:53.880]  Oh, it's not a judicial injunction.
[01:51:53.880 --> 01:51:57.880]  It falls under the FDCPA statute.
[01:51:57.880 --> 01:52:04.880]  His client has been assent and ordered to cease communication, and he's calling on their behalf.
[01:52:04.880 --> 01:52:05.880]  Okay.
[01:52:05.880 --> 01:52:11.880]  Well, then in that case, go ahead and just file against him in federal court.
[01:52:11.880 --> 01:52:16.880]  I usually just use it to get more money in the settlement.
[01:52:16.880 --> 01:52:17.880]  Right.
[01:52:17.880 --> 01:52:18.880]  Well, you can do that too.
[01:52:18.880 --> 01:52:24.880]  But I would still bargrieve him because if he actually represents that client
[01:52:24.880 --> 01:52:30.880]  instead of just buying their debt and acting like he represents them,
[01:52:30.880 --> 01:52:35.880]  then he would know there's a cease and desist communications, wouldn't he?
[01:52:35.880 --> 01:52:38.880]  Well, he should or he hasn't done his due diligence.
[01:52:38.880 --> 01:52:40.880]  You're missing the point here.
[01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:43.880]  He's claiming he is their legal counsel.
[01:52:43.880 --> 01:52:46.880]  He would know.
[01:52:46.880 --> 01:52:48.880]  Exactly.
[01:52:48.880 --> 01:52:55.880]  So he has knowingly violated the cease and desist order
[01:52:55.880 --> 01:53:00.880]  or the provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices, if that's what you're referring to.
[01:53:00.880 --> 01:53:02.880]  Right, statute in the FDCPA.
[01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:03.880]  Yeah.
[01:53:03.880 --> 01:53:06.880]  So I'd just go after him.
[01:53:06.880 --> 01:53:07.880]  All right, sounds good.
[01:53:07.880 --> 01:53:11.880]  Back your phone record of date and time, and if you've got a phone bill
[01:53:11.880 --> 01:53:16.880]  that shows the incoming calls on it or whatever, then make sure to keep that handy.
[01:53:16.880 --> 01:53:17.880]  Come on.
[01:53:17.880 --> 01:53:20.880]  You know I document all that stuff.
[01:53:20.880 --> 01:53:24.880]  Well, I don't know your paperwork habits, but still.
[01:53:24.880 --> 01:53:27.880]  Yeah, we got everything but his birth certificate.
[01:53:27.880 --> 01:53:30.880]  I'd go for that too, just so we know we got the right guy.
[01:53:30.880 --> 01:53:32.880]  Yeah.
[01:53:32.880 --> 01:53:33.880]  Take care.
[01:53:33.880 --> 01:53:34.880]  All right.
[01:53:34.880 --> 01:53:35.880]  Thanks, Mark.
[01:53:35.880 --> 01:53:36.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:37.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:53:37.880 --> 01:53:38.880]  All right.
[01:53:38.880 --> 01:53:41.880]  Now we have Julian in Virginia.
[01:53:41.880 --> 01:53:42.880]  Hi, Julian.
[01:53:42.880 --> 01:53:44.880]  What can we do for you?
[01:53:44.880 --> 01:53:46.880]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:53:46.880 --> 01:53:49.880]  What is cause and nature?
[01:53:49.880 --> 01:53:53.880]  What is cause and nature or nature and cause?
[01:53:53.880 --> 01:54:00.880]  The nature is, is the charge against you criminal, civil, or administrative in nature?
[01:54:00.880 --> 01:54:02.880]  Okay.
[01:54:02.880 --> 01:54:07.880]  And the cause itself is, or that's the nature.
[01:54:07.880 --> 01:54:14.880]  And the cause itself is the actual act or violation of what particular law?
[01:54:14.880 --> 01:54:15.880]  Okay.
[01:54:15.880 --> 01:54:22.880]  So why did the founders feel that was so important to put in our Constitution as they did?
[01:54:22.880 --> 01:54:26.880]  So that you would know the severity of what you're being charged with
[01:54:26.880 --> 01:54:31.880]  and its impact upon your rights and when it will invoke those rights.
[01:54:31.880 --> 01:54:35.880]  So what is the proper way to demand this then?
[01:54:35.880 --> 01:54:36.880]  How do I demand cause and nature?
[01:54:36.880 --> 01:54:39.880]  Demand what?
[01:54:39.880 --> 01:54:40.880]  Clarify that for me.
[01:54:40.880 --> 01:54:42.880]  Demand what?
[01:54:42.880 --> 01:54:45.880]  And what?
[01:54:45.880 --> 01:54:46.880]  I'm sorry.
[01:54:46.880 --> 01:54:48.880]  You're asking me.
[01:54:48.880 --> 01:54:50.880]  Yes.
[01:54:50.880 --> 01:54:51.880]  Okay.
[01:54:51.880 --> 01:54:55.880]  You're asking me what demand our rights you mean?
[01:54:55.880 --> 01:55:01.880]  Well, the Constitution of Virginia says a man has the right to demand cause and nature.
[01:55:01.880 --> 01:55:03.880]  So how do we demand it?
[01:55:03.880 --> 01:55:07.880]  Because they ain't giving it to me in a ticket.
[01:55:07.880 --> 01:55:08.880]  Well, no.
[01:55:08.880 --> 01:55:09.880]  You do that in court.
[01:55:09.880 --> 01:55:15.880]  You demand before the magistrate in open court upon the record to know the nature and cause.
[01:55:15.880 --> 01:55:18.880]  In Texas, not only are you allowed to know the nature and cause,
[01:55:18.880 --> 01:55:23.880]  you're entitled to a written copy of it.
[01:55:23.880 --> 01:55:27.880]  And I would make them provide me with a written copy of what that is.
[01:55:27.880 --> 01:55:32.880]  And if you look at whatever the Virginia equivalent of the Code of Criminal Procedure is,
[01:55:32.880 --> 01:55:38.880]  I'm sure you will find very close to the front somewhere involves the rights of the accused.
[01:55:38.880 --> 01:55:43.880]  And in that section, there will be a complete duplicate set of rules
[01:55:43.880 --> 01:55:52.880]  that mimic everything in your Constitution regarding those particular rights in a criminal case.
[01:55:52.880 --> 01:55:59.880]  So you use those statutes and your Constitutional article in section to tell the court,
[01:55:59.880 --> 01:56:07.880]  I have the right pursuant Virginia Constitution, Article 1, Section 15, or whatever it may be,
[01:56:07.880 --> 01:56:17.880]  and Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 1.05 and 1.051, or I'm sorry, in Texas, 1.04,
[01:56:17.880 --> 01:56:25.880]  to know the nature and cause of the charges against me.
[01:56:25.880 --> 01:56:32.880]  Now, if I did that in written form to the court, but not in open court, but sent it in and filed it.
[01:56:32.880 --> 01:56:34.880]  You can do that in a motion, most certainly.
[01:56:34.880 --> 01:56:40.880]  Yeah, what kind of answer could I expect to come back?
[01:56:40.880 --> 01:56:47.880]  Well, that really just means it should simply come back in a response that the court finds the following,
[01:56:47.880 --> 01:56:50.880]  and it gives you what it is.
[01:56:50.880 --> 01:56:55.880]  It says it will be something along the lines of the charges against you are criminal in nature
[01:56:55.880 --> 01:56:58.880]  or civil in nature or administrative in nature.
[01:56:58.880 --> 01:57:03.880]  The specific cause are the specific natures, those things.
[01:57:03.880 --> 01:57:07.880]  And the specific cause is you are charged of this act.
[01:57:07.880 --> 01:57:11.880]  Now, the question is, are they going to just give you a set of words,
[01:57:11.880 --> 01:57:17.880]  or are they going to refer you to a specific statutory or such enactment
[01:57:17.880 --> 01:57:21.880]  that tells you exactly what the criteria is for the offense?
[01:57:21.880 --> 01:57:23.880]  That part's unknown.
[01:57:23.880 --> 01:57:27.880]  They do their best not to tell you the specifics of the charge,
[01:57:27.880 --> 01:57:31.880]  so you have that much harder of a time finding it when you're pro se.
[01:57:31.880 --> 01:57:39.880]  Yeah. Okay, so I'm thinking I'm going to, first things first,
[01:57:39.880 --> 01:57:42.880]  get the nature and cause of this suit here.
[01:57:42.880 --> 01:57:49.880]  And after that, how do I get the other side to produce the complaint?
[01:57:49.880 --> 01:57:56.880]  Because affirmative defense seems to be something that they don't want you to do either.
[01:57:56.880 --> 01:58:04.880]  What are the rules in your state regarding the filing of a complaint?
[01:58:04.880 --> 01:58:06.880]  That's what you've got to find out.
[01:58:06.880 --> 01:58:10.880]  You need to read the statutes of your state in whatever is your code of criminal procedure.
[01:58:10.880 --> 01:58:13.880]  That's going to go a long way to informing you of this.
[01:58:13.880 --> 01:58:18.880]  There are things in there that says what they must do before they can acquire jurisdiction
[01:58:18.880 --> 01:58:19.880]  or proceed in a case.
[01:58:19.880 --> 01:58:22.880]  You need to know what those things are.
[01:58:22.880 --> 01:58:27.880]  All right. I'm headed to the law library soon. Take care.
[01:58:27.880 --> 01:58:29.880]  All right. Thanks for calling in, Julian.
[01:58:29.880 --> 01:58:31.880]  Stephen, I see you on the board.
[01:58:31.880 --> 01:58:33.880]  I am sorry we are out of time on the show.
[01:58:33.880 --> 01:58:36.880]  Please give us a call back on Monday night.
[01:58:36.880 --> 01:58:39.880]  In the meantime, folks, this has been Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:39.880 --> 01:58:42.880]  Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, thanks for listening in.
[01:58:42.880 --> 01:58:44.880]  Everybody that's going to the seminar tomorrow,
[01:58:44.880 --> 01:58:48.880]  please shoot me an email so I can get these documents out to you tonight.
[01:58:48.880 --> 01:58:52.880]  Thank you very much. God bless, and we will see you on Monday.
[01:59:18.880 --> 01:59:20.880]  Thank you very much.
[01:59:48.880 --> 01:59:50.880]  Thank you.