ROL_2026-03-06_16k.timecode

Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:16.000]  Bad boys, whatcha gonna do When sheriff John Brown come for you?
[00:16.000 --> 00:32.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:32.000 --> 00:37.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:37.000 --> 00:43.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits You'd go to school and learn the golden rule
[00:43.000 --> 00:48.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool? If you get hot then you must get cool
[00:48.000 --> 00:59.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:59.000 --> 01:05.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.000]  You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me
[01:10.000 --> 01:32.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[01:32.000 --> 01:37.000]  Nobody now give you no break Police now give you no break
[01:37.000 --> 01:42.000]  That old soldier man now give you no break Not even your agent now give you no breaks
[01:42.000 --> 01:59.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[01:59.000 --> 02:06.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[02:30.000 --> 02:38.000]  And I'm gonna start out with a strategy I'm working on
[02:38.000 --> 02:44.000]  You know, I've been trying to find a way to fix the system
[02:44.000 --> 02:54.000]  And I like ways to fix the system that come at you from a direction you don't see coming
[02:54.000 --> 03:02.000]  So right now what I'm trying to do is crack open access to grand juries
[03:02.000 --> 03:07.000]  There's a lot of bad stuff going on in the criminal justice system
[03:07.000 --> 03:12.000]  Actually, everything is wrong
[03:12.000 --> 03:19.000]  Every step from arrest to trial as presently practiced in the criminal justice system in Texas
[03:19.000 --> 03:26.000]  is not only wrong, it is very specifically against particular law
[03:26.000 --> 03:28.000]  Yeah, even before arrest actually
[03:28.000 --> 03:32.000]  Yeah, so what the hell's the problem here? What the heck is going on?
[03:32.000 --> 03:35.000]  Okay, I've been working on this
[03:35.000 --> 03:38.000]  Yeah, I sued all these guys because they're training them incorrectly
[03:38.000 --> 03:42.000]  I didn't get anywhere, but I'm still working on that
[03:42.000 --> 03:45.000]  What is, you know, how do we fix it?
[03:45.000 --> 03:48.000]  And it gets down to grand juries
[03:48.000 --> 04:00.000]  Grand juries, the only functional difference I can find between a democracy and a republic
[04:00.000 --> 04:10.000]  is the ability or the right or authority of a citizen in a republic
[04:10.000 --> 04:19.000]  to petition a grand jury for a redress, not redress of grievance
[04:19.000 --> 04:31.000]  to petition a grand jury to prosecute a public official for violating a law relating to his office
[04:32.000 --> 04:44.000]  The only, you know, in a democracy, the public rules, the majority rules
[04:44.000 --> 04:49.000]  and our founders were hated democracies
[04:49.000 --> 04:54.000]  They felt like democracies were a horrible form of government
[04:54.000 --> 04:57.000]  They did not want any such thing
[04:57.000 --> 05:01.000]  What they wanted was a republic
[05:01.000 --> 05:09.000]  And the only difference between a republic and a democracy is who controls the system
[05:09.000 --> 05:18.000]  In a democracy, the system itself controls the system
[05:18.000 --> 05:26.000]  The prosecutor, the judges, you know, we elect them in a democracy
[05:26.000 --> 05:31.000]  and once we elect them, they pretty well control the democracy
[05:31.000 --> 05:40.000]  In a republic, the ultimate authority reverts to the individual citizen himself
[05:40.000 --> 05:49.000]  The singular difference between a democracy, a government-controlled democracy, and a republic
[05:49.000 --> 05:59.000]  is the ability of a citizen in a republic to control the governmental instruments they have created
[05:59.000 --> 06:09.000]  And the only effective way a citizen has of controlling the governmental instruments they have created
[06:09.000 --> 06:12.000]  is with the grand jury
[06:13.000 --> 06:15.000]  I still don't know
[06:15.000 --> 06:20.000]  You're mentioning this about the difference between republic and democracy
[06:20.000 --> 06:22.000]  and I still don't know
[06:22.000 --> 06:24.000]  I'm not 100% convinced about that
[06:24.000 --> 06:28.000]  but you know what, I can't find any problem with that line of thinking
[06:28.000 --> 06:34.000]  I haven't thought of anything else that's a good, clear delineator
[06:34.000 --> 06:39.000]  So it seems like, you know, you might as well roll with that and let them try to say otherwise
[06:40.000 --> 06:42.000]  You're depriving me of my republic
[06:42.000 --> 06:50.000]  Yeah, in a republic or a democracy, we have rule of law, we allegedly have rule of law
[06:50.000 --> 06:56.000]  and I can go to the courts and petition for redress of grievance
[06:56.000 --> 07:00.000]  in a democracy or a republic
[07:01.000 --> 07:13.000]  But if I'm in a democracy and the public officials that are required to provide me with procedural due process
[07:13.000 --> 07:18.000]  with adherence to the rule of law, what if they don't?
[07:18.000 --> 07:22.000]  What if they don't? That's exactly where we are right now
[07:22.000 --> 07:24.000]  But what if we don't?
[07:24.000 --> 07:29.000]  You know, we've all learned the basics of how to follow the rules
[07:29.000 --> 07:34.000]  and how to do things right, how to navigate the court, the system
[07:34.000 --> 07:38.000]  in the way so that we won't lose for dumb reasons
[07:38.000 --> 07:42.000]  But now we're past that and we're to the point where we follow the rules
[07:42.000 --> 07:47.000]  and we can even recognize when the opposing counsel does not follow the rules
[07:47.000 --> 07:49.000]  and we do all the proper objections
[07:49.000 --> 07:57.000]  We do all the proper diligent preservation of judicial error and unethical lawyer activity
[07:57.000 --> 08:04.000]  and we work our tails off to document because they are so prolific with their error
[08:04.000 --> 08:07.000]  and their unethical behavior
[08:08.000 --> 08:10.000]  The problem we run into
[08:10.000 --> 08:11.000]  Yeah
[08:11.000 --> 08:15.000]  is we have the government controlling the government
[08:15.000 --> 08:21.000]  And the only difference, and I've been doing this for almost four years now
[08:22.000 --> 08:29.000]  The only difference I can find between a democracy and a republic is a grand jury
[08:30.000 --> 08:32.000]  That's the only difference
[08:32.000 --> 08:41.000]  I as a citizen in a republic have the power to petition a grand jury for redress of grievance
[08:41.000 --> 08:44.000]  You theoretically have that power
[08:44.000 --> 08:48.000]  In practice, do you really have the power in actual practice?
[08:48.000 --> 08:50.000]  Article
[08:50.000 --> 08:52.000]  No, that's what I'm saying
[08:52.000 --> 08:56.000]  According to black and white, yes, on paper you have it
[08:56.000 --> 08:58.000]  But can you really exercise it?
[08:58.000 --> 09:00.000]  No
[09:00.000 --> 09:04.000]  It seems like all of my efforts to do so have been thwarted
[09:04.000 --> 09:14.000]  And I even get walls of big guys with their arms crossed lined up in front of me acting like I'm the bad guy
[09:14.000 --> 09:18.000]  That is the perfect perspective
[09:18.000 --> 09:20.000]  That's exactly where I'm going
[09:20.000 --> 09:24.000]  I'm going to go to Dallas County
[09:24.000 --> 09:28.000]  And I'm going to go to the Dallas County grand jury
[09:28.000 --> 09:34.000]  With a notice of crime
[09:34.000 --> 09:38.000]  And the bailiff is going to interfere with me
[09:38.000 --> 09:40.000]  I'm going to go to the bailiff and I'm going to tell him
[09:40.000 --> 09:45.000]  Instruct the foreman that I have business with the grand jury
[09:45.000 --> 09:47.000]  And he's going to say
[09:47.000 --> 09:50.000]  And you know the bailiff doesn't like to take directions from you
[09:50.000 --> 09:56.000]  Oh, well he especially won't like it when I do it
[09:56.000 --> 10:03.000]  Because I do it in a particular way designed to be annoying
[10:03.000 --> 10:05.000]  And irritating
[10:05.000 --> 10:07.000]  I go to the bailiff and I say
[10:07.000 --> 10:08.000]  Are you the bailiff of the grand jury?
[10:08.000 --> 10:09.000]  Yes, I am
[10:09.000 --> 10:12.000]  Instruct the foreman that I have business with the grand jury
[10:12.000 --> 10:13.000]  And he will say
[10:13.000 --> 10:15.000]  May I tell him the nature of the business?
[10:15.000 --> 10:17.000]  No, you may not
[10:17.000 --> 10:22.000]  I have business with the grand jury and it's none of yours
[10:22.000 --> 10:26.000]  Okay, let me explain how I get there
[10:26.000 --> 10:29.000]  An article
[10:29.000 --> 10:32.000]  Okay, what is it?
[10:32.000 --> 10:38.000]  28.051
[10:38.000 --> 10:41.000]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says
[10:41.000 --> 10:47.000]  The grand jury shall examine into all crimes subject to indictment
[10:47.000 --> 10:50.000]  That come to their knowledge by way of
[10:50.000 --> 10:53.000]  Any member of the grand jury
[10:53.000 --> 10:55.000]  The prosecuting attorney
[10:55.000 --> 10:57.000]  Or any credible person
[10:57.000 --> 11:02.000]  And the thing to pay attention to here is
[11:02.000 --> 11:06.000]  The district attorney or any credible person
[11:06.000 --> 11:11.000]  Are listed on the same logical level
[11:11.000 --> 11:19.000]  The prosecutor has no more authority to give notice of crime to the grand jury than I do
[11:19.000 --> 11:22.000]  And that's what we're missing
[11:22.000 --> 11:23.000]  A prosecutor
[11:23.000 --> 11:30.000]  So I'm going to take criminal complaints against the district attorney in Tarrant County
[11:30.000 --> 11:34.000]  Allegations of sedition
[11:34.000 --> 11:40.000]  I'm going to allege that the assistant district attorney in Tarrant County
[11:40.000 --> 11:44.000]  Used the bailiff who has a pistol on his hip
[11:44.000 --> 11:56.000]  To block me from giving notice to the grand jury of crime in my capacity as a credible person
[11:56.000 --> 12:01.000]  And credible person in Texas law is defined as
[12:01.000 --> 12:11.000]  Any member of the public not convicted of a felony
[12:11.000 --> 12:14.000]  And I think you have to be age of majority as well
[12:14.000 --> 12:20.000]  And I'm sorry any member of the public above the age of majority never convicted of a felony
[12:20.000 --> 12:23.000]  Once you're convicted of a felony
[12:23.000 --> 12:27.000]  And I'm not sure if that's absolute it may be some felonies
[12:27.000 --> 12:32.000]  Once you're convicted of a felony you're not construed to be a credible person
[12:32.000 --> 12:40.000]  Well I've been convicted of a Class A misdemeanor and they give you a year in jail
[12:40.000 --> 12:44.000]  I didn't spend that year in jail but I was convicted of it but that doesn't make any difference
[12:44.000 --> 12:48.000]  Because I was never convicted of a felony
[12:48.000 --> 12:58.000]  So the statute says that the grand jury shall examine into any crime subject to indictment
[12:58.000 --> 13:02.000]  That comes to their knowledge by way of any member of the public
[13:02.000 --> 13:03.000]  I'm sorry
[13:03.000 --> 13:06.000]  Any member of the grand jury
[13:06.000 --> 13:10.000]  Prosecuting attorney or any credible person
[13:10.000 --> 13:14.000]  Those are on the same logical level
[13:14.000 --> 13:23.000]  So the prosecutor as I see the code has no more authority to give notice of crime to the grand jury than I do
[13:23.000 --> 13:37.000]  Now it goes on to say that the prosecutor by virtue of his office has the statutory authority to present criminal complaints to the grand jury
[13:37.000 --> 13:43.000]  See he can do that as a matter of statute
[13:43.000 --> 13:49.000]  But I can do it if the grand jury asks me to
[13:50.000 --> 13:54.000]  So we're still on the same logical level
[13:54.000 --> 13:57.000]  Hang on, we'll be right back
[14:20.000 --> 14:23.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[14:23.000 --> 14:25.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[14:25.000 --> 14:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[14:28.000 --> 14:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[14:32.000 --> 14:37.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[14:37.000 --> 14:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[14:40.000 --> 14:45.000]  For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[14:45.000 --> 14:48.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[14:48.000 --> 14:50.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[14:50.000 --> 14:56.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[14:56.000 --> 14:59.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[15:01.000 --> 15:04.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar
[15:04.000 --> 15:06.000]  In today's America we live in an us against them society
[15:06.000 --> 15:08.000]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[15:08.000 --> 15:11.000]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[15:11.000 --> 15:14.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[15:14.000 --> 15:16.000]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[15:16.000 --> 15:18.000]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[15:18.000 --> 15:21.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[15:21.000 --> 15:24.000]  To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[15:24.000 --> 15:27.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[15:27.000 --> 15:30.000]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[15:30.000 --> 15:32.000]  That will help you understand what due process is
[15:32.000 --> 15:34.000]  And how to hold courts to the rule of law
[15:34.000 --> 15:36.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[15:36.000 --> 15:39.000]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[15:39.000 --> 15:41.000]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[15:41.000 --> 15:44.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[15:44.000 --> 15:46.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[15:46.000 --> 15:49.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[15:49.000 --> 15:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[15:53.000 --> 15:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[16:14.000 --> 16:16.000]  The Texas Transportation Code
[16:44.000 --> 16:55.000]  Okay, we are back here at Fountain Rule of Law Radio
[16:55.000 --> 16:59.000]  And if I seem a little pedantic
[16:59.000 --> 17:06.000]  It's because I'm going to something very nuanced and very specific
[17:07.000 --> 17:13.000]  I'm saying that under 28.051
[17:13.000 --> 17:17.000]  The duties of grand juries shall be the duty of the grand jury
[17:17.000 --> 17:21.000]  To examine into all crimes subject to indictment
[17:21.000 --> 17:27.000]  That come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury
[17:27.000 --> 17:33.000]  The prosecuting attorney or any credible person
[17:33.000 --> 17:38.000]  A credible person is defined as any person over the age of majority
[17:38.000 --> 17:43.000]  Which in Texas is 18 and has never been convicted of a felony
[17:43.000 --> 17:48.000]  So those two, prosecuting attorney and credible person
[17:48.000 --> 17:53.000]  Are on the same logical level in the statute
[17:53.000 --> 18:00.000]  There's nothing in there that gives the prosecuting attorney
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  The standing that supersedes the standing of a citizen
[18:05.000 --> 18:10.000]  As it goes to giving notice of crime
[18:10.000 --> 18:17.000]  There is a difference in who can do a presentment to the grand jury
[18:17.000 --> 18:24.000]  A presentment to the grand jury is where someone comes before the grand jury
[18:24.000 --> 18:31.000]  And presents the allegation to the grand jury
[18:31.000 --> 18:39.000]  Now, a prosecuting attorney under statute can do that as a matter of statutory right
[18:39.000 --> 18:45.000]  But anybody can do it if the grand jury requests that they do so
[18:45.000 --> 18:48.000]  And I have done that myself
[18:49.000 --> 18:58.000]  So I'm saying that I'm not here to give a presentment to the grand jury
[18:58.000 --> 19:04.000]  In Tarrant County I went to the grand jury and I brought them a set of allegations
[19:04.000 --> 19:08.000]  And the prosecutor, I gave them to the bailiff to give them to the grand jury
[19:08.000 --> 19:11.000]  And the prosecutor came out with them, he said, these are not verified
[19:11.000 --> 19:15.000]  I said, of course they're not verified
[19:15.000 --> 19:18.000]  If they were verified, this would be a presentment
[19:18.000 --> 19:22.000]  I can't do a presentment to the grand jury unless the grand jury asks me to
[19:22.000 --> 19:28.000]  I am merely giving notice under 28.051
[19:28.000 --> 19:35.000]  But 28.051 or 151?
[19:35.000 --> 19:40.000]  051 says they shall inquire into all offenses subject to indictment
[19:40.000 --> 19:47.000]  Which means criminal because all of them in Texas are subject to indictment
[19:47.000 --> 19:51.000]  I'm not doing a presentment to the grand jury under oath
[19:51.000 --> 19:56.000]  I'm just saying, hey guys, these guys did this dirty rotten crap
[19:56.000 --> 19:58.000]  I'm just giving notice
[19:58.000 --> 20:04.000]  And the prosecutor said, you can't give this to the grand jury unless they're verified
[20:04.000 --> 20:07.000]  And I thought about that
[20:07.000 --> 20:10.000]  And I thought, who the heck is he?
[20:10.000 --> 20:14.000]  What does he have to do with the grand jury?
[20:14.000 --> 20:18.000]  So I'm preparing this week
[20:18.000 --> 20:22.000]  I'm going to go to the Dallas County grand jury
[20:22.000 --> 20:28.000]  And I'm going to bring them criminal complaints against the Tarrant County grand jury
[20:28.000 --> 20:33.000]  I'm sorry, against the Tarrant County District Attorney
[20:34.000 --> 20:38.000]  And I'm going to accuse the Tarrant County District Attorney
[20:38.000 --> 20:41.000]  of secreting criminal complaints against public officials
[20:41.000 --> 20:45.000]  from the Tarrant County grand jury
[20:45.000 --> 20:49.000]  And what's going to happen is, is first thing
[20:49.000 --> 20:55.000]  is the bailiff is going to tell me that I have to go to the prosecuting attorney
[20:55.000 --> 20:58.000]  and I'm working out a strategy
[20:58.000 --> 21:03.000]  So what I think I'm going to do is I'm going to go to the bailiff's office
[21:03.000 --> 21:05.000]  to the constable's office
[21:05.000 --> 21:08.000]  and tell him I need a bailiff
[21:08.000 --> 21:16.000]  He said, I'm going to go up to the bailiff who is in front of the grand jury
[21:16.000 --> 21:21.000]  and I'm going to direct the bailiff to notify the former of the grand jury
[21:21.000 --> 21:26.000]  that I have business with the grand jury
[21:26.000 --> 21:30.000]  And he's going to tell me that, he's going to ask me why
[21:30.000 --> 21:32.000]  and I'm going to have to verify criminal affidavit
[21:32.000 --> 21:34.000]  I have criminal complaints
[21:34.000 --> 21:38.000]  I need to give notice to the grand, I'm sorry
[21:38.000 --> 21:44.000]  I need to give notice of the grand jury of crime by public officials
[21:44.000 --> 21:49.000]  And the bailiff's going to say, well you need to give those to the prosecuting attorney
[21:49.000 --> 21:52.000]  I said, no I can't give them to the prosecuting attorney
[21:52.000 --> 21:54.000]  And he's going to say, well why not?
[21:54.000 --> 21:58.000]  Well because their crimes committed in Tarrant County, and this is Dallas County
[21:58.000 --> 22:04.000]  and the district attorney does not have jurisdiction over those
[22:04.000 --> 22:08.000]  He is an attorney for the state
[22:08.000 --> 22:14.000]  He is hired and authorized to represent the state in criminal accusations
[22:14.000 --> 22:17.000]  Yeah, but he has very specific territorial boundaries
[22:17.000 --> 22:22.000]  Yeah, criminal accusations of crime committed in Dallas County
[22:22.000 --> 22:30.000]  I'm giving the state grand jury notice of crime that was committed in Tarrant County
[22:30.000 --> 22:35.000]  So even if the Tarrant County grand jury, I'm sorry
[22:35.000 --> 22:39.000]  Even if the grand jury finds probable cause
[22:39.000 --> 22:44.000]  and issues an indictment
[22:44.000 --> 22:50.000]  This prosecuting attorney who is a lawyer for the state
[22:50.000 --> 22:54.000]  They call him prosecuting attorney, but what he really is
[22:54.000 --> 23:01.000]  is a lawyer that the state hired to represent the state in criminal prosecutions
[23:01.000 --> 23:10.000]  So there is no criminal prosecution within the jurisdiction over which this district attorney has authority
[23:11.000 --> 23:21.000]  I'm alleging to a state grand jury that was consecrated in Dallas County
[23:21.000 --> 23:27.000]  However, it's not a county grand jury, it is a state grand jury
[23:27.000 --> 23:33.000]  It is not compensated by the county commissioner's court
[23:33.000 --> 23:36.000]  It is compensated by the state
[23:36.000 --> 23:40.000]  And just like justices of the peace
[23:40.000 --> 23:49.000]  Justices of the peace have authority to hear under attorney general opinion
[23:49.000 --> 23:54.000]  JM 500, Jim Morales 500
[23:54.000 --> 24:04.000]  A magistrate in the state of Texas may hear any complaint, felony, or misdemeanor from anywhere in the state, state or federal
[24:05.000 --> 24:15.000]  So while they're elected in the county, more specifically in a precinct in the county
[24:15.000 --> 24:24.000]  They have statewide jurisdiction in their capacity as a magistrate for the purpose of hearing criminal accusations
[24:24.000 --> 24:27.000]  And I'm alleging that the grand jury
[24:27.000 --> 24:32.000]  While there's a grand jury consecrated in each county
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  That they are not compensated by the county commissioner's court
[24:37.000 --> 24:40.000]  They are compensated by the state
[24:40.000 --> 24:43.000]  They are state grand juries
[24:43.000 --> 24:52.000]  And they're consecrated in each county just so that the public will have ready access to a grand jury
[24:52.000 --> 24:55.000]  Not for the purpose of limiting their jurisdiction
[24:55.000 --> 25:08.000]  There is nothing in the statutory language that would indicate or imply that a grand jury that is consecrated in a particular county
[25:08.000 --> 25:13.000]  Is limited in jurisdiction to that county
[25:13.000 --> 25:26.000]  If the legislature had intended that a state grand jury be limited in its application to a specific county
[25:26.000 --> 25:28.000]  They would have said so
[25:28.000 --> 25:30.000]  Absolutely, they would have said so
[25:30.000 --> 25:32.000]  But they didn't say so
[25:32.000 --> 25:42.000]  So therefore it must be construed that the legislature intended that a state grand jury paid by the state
[25:42.000 --> 25:46.000]  Consecrated by a state office, not a county office
[25:46.000 --> 25:53.000]  The district court consecrates a grand jury, that is not a county office, that's a state
[25:53.000 --> 26:00.000]  And they consecrate a grand jury, they are paid for by the state, the county doesn't have anything to do with it
[26:00.000 --> 26:03.000]  No, it just says all offenses subject to indictment
[26:03.000 --> 26:12.000]  It doesn't say all offenses within the district or within the county or all offenses that are not handled by
[26:12.000 --> 26:15.000]  It just says anything subject to indictment
[26:15.000 --> 26:24.000]  Now that covers, that phrase, all offenses subject to indictment is a blanket statement for all crimes
[26:24.000 --> 26:27.000]  You guys, we're being really pedantic and specific here
[26:27.000 --> 26:31.000]  But it is important that we be specific
[26:31.000 --> 26:44.000]  And the issue I'm bringing is that the district attorney in Tarrant County blocked my access to the grand jury
[26:44.000 --> 26:51.000]  Well I've got one more thing for you here that you're probably going to like about this chapter 20A
[26:51.000 --> 26:55.000]  That gives you even more of a chance to access
[26:55.000 --> 26:57.000]  Wait, wait, wait, we'll be right back
[27:01.000 --> 27:04.000]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work
[27:04.000 --> 27:06.000]  But have they negatively affected our health?
[27:06.000 --> 27:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry
[27:13.000 --> 27:16.000]  Privacy is under attack
[27:16.000 --> 27:19.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[27:19.000 --> 27:24.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[27:24.000 --> 27:29.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[27:29.000 --> 27:32.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[27:32.000 --> 27:35.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[27:35.000 --> 27:39.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[27:39.000 --> 27:42.000]  Start over with StartPage
[27:43.000 --> 27:46.000]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy, it's a fact
[27:46.000 --> 27:51.000]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed
[27:51.000 --> 27:55.000]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns
[27:55.000 --> 28:01.000]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry
[28:01.000 --> 28:10.000]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on
[28:10.000 --> 28:15.000]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances
[28:15.000 --> 28:19.000]  I always keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset
[28:19.000 --> 28:24.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[28:45.000 --> 28:51.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story
[28:51.000 --> 28:54.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son
[28:54.000 --> 28:56.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org
[28:56.000 --> 28:59.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do
[29:00.000 --> 29:05.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[29:05.000 --> 29:11.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk
[29:11.000 --> 29:16.000]  where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[29:16.000 --> 29:23.000]  Study to show thy self-approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth
[29:23.000 --> 29:27.000]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark
[29:27.000 --> 29:31.000]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message
[29:31.000 --> 29:38.000]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[29:38.000 --> 29:43.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[29:43.000 --> 29:49.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[29:49.000 --> 29:59.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures
[30:02.000 --> 30:05.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[30:06.000 --> 30:09.000]  at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:10.000 --> 30:15.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  and I'm gonna solve them
[30:18.000 --> 30:20.000]  to the head of government
[30:20.000 --> 30:30.000]  Okay, we are back. We're at the Bret Fountain Rivla Radio on this Friday, the sixth day of March, 2026
[30:30.000 --> 30:40.000]  and what we're doing here is something focused and relatively pedantic
[30:40.000 --> 30:48.000]  so you have to kind of play close attention to get the subtlety of the situation
[30:49.000 --> 30:59.000]  I'm claiming that the district attorney in Tarrant County blocked my access to a grand jury
[30:59.000 --> 31:06.000]  with criminal complaints that I had against public officials in Tarrant County
[31:06.000 --> 31:12.000]  and I'm taking that complaint to a Dallas County grand jury
[31:12.000 --> 31:21.000]  and the Dallas County district attorney is going to say, oh, you have to go to the county of jurisdiction
[31:21.000 --> 31:35.000]  the Dallas County grand jury doesn't have jurisdiction to indict someone for a criminal action in Tarrant County
[31:35.000 --> 31:39.000]  and I'm going to say, hold on a minute
[31:40.000 --> 31:48.000]  and listen carefully guys, we're making a really distinct legal consideration
[31:48.000 --> 31:53.000]  Who has standing to raise the issue?
[31:53.000 --> 32:03.000]  The prosecuting attorney is a lawyer hired to represent the state in criminal prosecutions
[32:03.000 --> 32:05.000]  But not all criminal prosecutions
[32:05.000 --> 32:07.000]  Exactly
[32:07.000 --> 32:11.000]  Only the ones that come in certain dotted lines geographically
[32:11.000 --> 32:16.000]  The Dallas County district attorney has been hired by the state
[32:16.000 --> 32:22.000]  He's been elected by state officials so that he could be hired by the state
[32:22.000 --> 32:29.000]  as a lawyer representing the state in criminal prosecutions in Dallas County
[32:30.000 --> 32:42.000]  So I'm coming to a Dallas County grand jury with criminal complaints against the prosecuting attorney in Tarrant County
[32:42.000 --> 32:50.000]  accusing him of violating a criminal law statute in Tarrant County
[32:50.000 --> 33:06.000]  So the question becomes, can a grand jury in Dallas County indict someone for violating a law in Tarrant County
[33:06.000 --> 33:14.000]  and more specifically the question becomes, who can object to that?
[33:14.000 --> 33:22.000]  So if I go to a Dallas County grand jury and ask them to indict someone for committing a crime in Tarrant County
[33:22.000 --> 33:32.000]  the prosecutor's going to want to come to me and say, oh, the Dallas County grand jury can only hear crimes in Tarrant County
[33:32.000 --> 33:37.000]  Well, I mean, in Dallas County, they can't hear crimes in Tarrant County, so where'd you come up with that?
[33:37.000 --> 33:39.000]  Yeah
[33:40.000 --> 33:47.000]  You and I as citizens in the republic, we can do anything we want to
[33:47.000 --> 33:59.000]  We can do anything we want to unless we are specifically forbidden to do so by particular legislation
[33:59.000 --> 34:16.000]  I can find nothing in law that forbids me to give notice of crime to a grand jury in a county other than the county in which the crime occurred
[34:16.000 --> 34:20.000]  I can't find that anywhere, it doesn't exist
[34:20.000 --> 34:29.000]  So as a citizen in a republic, I can do anything that I want to
[34:29.000 --> 34:36.000]  And not only that, not only as a citizen you are unlimited
[34:36.000 --> 34:47.000]  but also the law is silent about limiting that grand jury's authority to some territory, I mean other than the state of Texas
[34:47.000 --> 34:55.000]  There's no limitation that says they have to do so only within their district or only within their county
[34:55.000 --> 34:59.000]  So their authority to act is not limited
[34:59.000 --> 35:03.000]  There is some case law that says that
[35:03.000 --> 35:11.000]  But I'm saying that the case law that says that is not supported by legislation
[35:11.000 --> 35:31.000]  The legislation creates a grand jury as a state grand jury that is consecrated by the district court, which is a state court
[35:31.000 --> 35:46.000]  And although the law requires that a grand jury be consecrated in every county, they are not a county agency
[35:46.000 --> 35:50.000]  They are not paid by the county, they are paid by the state
[35:50.000 --> 36:03.000]  And there's nothing in statutory law that restricts the jurisdiction of a state agency to a particular county
[36:03.000 --> 36:06.000]  Just like justices of the peace
[36:06.000 --> 36:15.000]  Yeah, it literally makes no sense, it would be absurd to think that a justice of the peace would have statewide jurisdiction
[36:15.000 --> 36:20.000]  If we had a grand jury convened of 12 of our peers, they wouldn't have that
[36:20.000 --> 36:29.000]  It seems like it's absurd to imagine a limit on the 12 when there's no limit on the magistrate
[36:29.000 --> 36:48.000]  In an attorney general's opinion, JM 500, says that under Article 2.10, it says that the magistrate shall keep the peace in the state
[36:48.000 --> 37:00.000]  And based on that, the attorney general determined in a brief under JM 500 that any magistrate in the state of Texas
[37:00.000 --> 37:11.000]  Not only are magistrates restricted in their election and their authority to a specific county
[37:11.000 --> 37:17.000]  They're also restricted to a specific precinct within that specific county
[37:17.000 --> 37:19.000]  When they're elected
[37:19.000 --> 37:26.000]  But they are not paid by the county, they're paid by the state
[37:26.000 --> 37:33.000]  And attorney general opinion JM 500 says that they are state officials
[37:33.000 --> 37:39.000]  It is their duty to keep the peace in the state, not the county
[37:40.000 --> 37:49.000]  So a magistrate may hear any complaint, felony or misdemeanor, state or federal, from anywhere in the state
[37:49.000 --> 37:51.000]  So then we go to a grand jury
[37:51.000 --> 37:58.000]  And while they have magistrates in every county and in every precinct in every county
[37:58.000 --> 38:06.000]  Because they want a magistrate available within 15 miles of any point in the county
[38:06.000 --> 38:16.000]  And the reason 15 miles is because that's legally how far you can ride a horse in one day
[38:16.000 --> 38:23.000]  So that if a policeman or a sheriff arrests a citizen for any reason
[38:23.000 --> 38:28.000]  He is to take him directly to the nearest magistrate
[38:28.000 --> 38:32.000]  So they set magistrates in precincts
[38:32.000 --> 38:43.000]  And if you look at your maps, you'll find that in Texas, precincts are arranged so that from any point in the county
[38:43.000 --> 38:47.000]  There is a magistrate within 15 miles
[38:47.000 --> 38:53.000]  So that if you arrest someone, you can take him directly to the nearest magistrate
[38:53.000 --> 38:57.000]  So that's very specific
[38:57.000 --> 39:01.000]  This is a requirement that's been in law since 1215 AD
[39:01.000 --> 39:08.000]  And the state adopted it from the Magna Carta Libertatum
[39:08.000 --> 39:12.000]  They brought it up into current law
[39:12.000 --> 39:22.000]  And they created grand juries that are on a par with magistrates
[39:22.000 --> 39:27.000]  Justices of the peace, not just justice of the peace, but all magistrates
[39:27.000 --> 39:32.000]  In that a grand jury can make a determination of probable cause
[39:32.000 --> 39:36.000]  Magistrates can do the same thing
[39:36.000 --> 39:43.000]  So to say that while a magistrate who's elected in a precinct in a county
[39:43.000 --> 39:48.000]  Can only have jurisdiction, and is authorized to have jurisdiction over the whole state
[39:48.000 --> 39:58.000]  And then say that a state-appointed grand jury is restricted to a county
[39:58.000 --> 40:01.000]  Brett, how does that make sense?
[40:01.000 --> 40:05.000]  To me it doesn't. I don't see anything in law that supports it
[40:05.000 --> 40:12.000]  And like you said, if some judge said so, he's just opining without any legislative support
[40:12.000 --> 40:16.000]  And I think that's what we call legislating from the bench
[40:16.000 --> 40:22.000]  And here I have a situation where I'm alleging that the district attorney in Tarrant County
[40:22.000 --> 40:30.000]  Is going to great lengths to block citizens from access to the county grand jury
[40:30.000 --> 40:39.000]  The grand jury, when they come to the courthouse, they go into a private city parking area
[40:39.000 --> 40:44.000]  They go into the 4th or the criminal courts building
[40:45.000 --> 40:49.000]  Everything's all cordoned off, they have their own entrance, their own...
[40:49.000 --> 40:51.000]  Keep them away from the people
[40:51.000 --> 40:55.000]  They go to the basement, they cross under the highway and come up into the courthouse
[40:55.000 --> 40:57.000]  You never get there
[40:59.000 --> 41:02.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:02.000 --> 41:06.000]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:06.000 --> 41:10.000]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:10.000 --> 41:15.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[41:15.000 --> 41:17.000]  By lowering the claims cost?
[41:17.000 --> 41:23.000]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[41:23.000 --> 41:29.000]  That provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc
[41:29.000 --> 41:32.000]  All at zero cost, with zero co-pay
[41:32.000 --> 41:38.000]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[41:38.000 --> 41:44.000]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[41:44.000 --> 41:51.000]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit
[41:51.000 --> 41:59.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[41:59.000 --> 42:02.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:02.000 --> 42:06.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[42:06.000 --> 42:14.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[42:14.000 --> 42:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[42:18.000 --> 42:21.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[42:21.000 --> 42:26.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[42:26.000 --> 42:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[42:33.000 --> 42:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[42:38.000 --> 42:42.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[42:42.000 --> 42:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[42:51.000 --> 43:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ
[43:03.000 --> 43:08.000]  Thank you for watching!
[43:33.000 --> 43:40.000]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton
[43:40.000 --> 43:46.000]  I'm just here making my living pushing buttons
[43:46.000 --> 43:51.000]  I give my message out to anyone in shouting distance
[43:51.000 --> 43:57.000]  I vote for bravery and against slavery showing resistance
[43:57.000 --> 44:02.000]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting
[44:02.000 --> 44:07.000]  I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[44:20.000 --> 44:25.000]  We sat down to play Monopoly, we all wanted to win the game
[44:25.000 --> 44:31.000]  We gave some guy endless money supply, we must have not been thinking with brains
[44:31.000 --> 44:36.000]  After some time, the worth of my dime got beat down to damn near nothing
[44:36.000 --> 44:41.000]  I might have been doing alright still, I make my living pushing buttons
[44:54.000 --> 44:59.000]  There's a man over there with ammunition looking for a brand new chance
[44:59.000 --> 45:04.000]  To profit from my fear, we're gonna show him a brand new dance
[45:04.000 --> 45:10.000]  267 stories, they blew up into almost nothing
[45:10.000 --> 45:15.000]  I'm in pain in the rain, it makes me make my living pushing buttons
[45:15.000 --> 45:20.000]  Yeah, I'm pushing so good
[45:23.000 --> 45:26.000]  Like I know I should
[45:26.000 --> 45:32.000]  Okay, I know that what we're doing here probably seems kind of pedantic
[45:32.000 --> 45:39.000]  But it is a really important, fine distinction of law
[45:39.000 --> 45:49.000]  Texas and every other state, the federal government requires that we be provided with a Republican form of government
[45:49.000 --> 46:02.000]  And the problem with that is, is that the feds do not specifically define what a federal, what a
[46:02.000 --> 46:07.000]  I lost the word, Brett
[46:07.000 --> 46:10.000]  I'm not sure where you're going with that
[46:10.000 --> 46:16.000]  Specifically, what defines a republic as opposed to a democracy?
[46:16.000 --> 46:22.000]  And nowhere in law can I find anything that defines the difference between the two
[46:22.000 --> 46:26.000]  They just say we have a right to a Republican form of government
[46:26.000 --> 46:33.000]  It doesn't say specifically how is a Republican form of government
[46:33.000 --> 46:40.000]  Distinguished from any other form of government, specifically a democracy
[46:40.000 --> 46:48.000]  The only difference I can find is the power of the individual
[46:48.000 --> 46:56.000]  To hold the, to maintain the governmental instruments they have created
[46:56.000 --> 47:08.000]  And the only way I can find to do that is by using the grand jury to take recalcitrant public officials to criminal task
[47:08.000 --> 47:15.000]  So in my opinion, after some 40 years of research on how to fix this problem
[47:15.000 --> 47:21.000]  It boils down to this one issue
[47:21.000 --> 47:26.000]  The ability of a citizen to give notice of crime to a grand jury
[47:26.000 --> 47:33.000]  And thereby maintain the governmental instruments they have created
[47:33.000 --> 47:39.000]  So yes, we're being detailed and pedantic
[47:39.000 --> 47:46.000]  So now I'm saying I have a county in Texas, Tarrant County
[47:46.000 --> 47:50.000]  And they have elected a district attorney
[47:50.000 --> 47:54.000]  Well, what is a district attorney?
[47:54.000 --> 47:58.000]  A district attorney is a lawyer
[47:58.000 --> 48:08.000]  Elected by the public and hired by the state to represent the state in criminal prosecutions
[48:08.000 --> 48:11.000]  And what is a grand jury?
[48:11.000 --> 48:18.000]  A grand jury is a panel that must be impaneled in every state
[48:18.000 --> 48:26.000]  That is required to make a determination of probable cause on a criminal accusation
[48:26.000 --> 48:36.000]  And by that determination, if it is a true bill, if they find probable cause
[48:36.000 --> 48:43.000]  Then they invoke jurisdiction on the state to prosecute that particular crime
[48:43.000 --> 48:54.000]  The only way the state can get an authority to enforce a criminal allegation is by way of a grand jury
[48:54.000 --> 49:02.000]  Now, the courts have filed some BS rulings that says you don't have a right to a grand jury in a felony
[49:02.000 --> 49:07.000]  We're not going to address that here, but we're going to say that's horse poop
[49:07.000 --> 49:10.000]  That is absolutely horse poop
[49:10.000 --> 49:13.000]  That's not what the legislation intended
[49:13.000 --> 49:19.000]  That's what judges and prosecutors wanted
[49:19.000 --> 49:25.000]  They wanted that distinction to make it easier for them to prosecute the lower level crimes
[49:25.000 --> 49:31.000]  For which there is a much higher number of those crimes
[49:31.000 --> 49:37.000]  Which takes more time to adjudicate, so they wanted to streamline the process
[49:37.000 --> 49:45.000]  But the legislature did not make a distinction between misdemeanors and felonies as concerned to grand jury
[49:45.000 --> 49:59.000]  They said that we don't want the judicial branch or the executive branch to determine if someone should have to stand and answer
[49:59.000 --> 50:09.000]  Our founders understood what a democracy was and they hated democracies
[50:09.000 --> 50:20.000]  So they created this special form of government where the government could not make a determination of probable cause
[50:20.000 --> 50:27.000]  A panel of ordinary citizens had to make that determination
[50:27.000 --> 50:36.000]  And that was to keep the prosecutor or the judicial branch and executive branch in check
[50:37.000 --> 50:43.000]  And the executive branch and the judicial branch do not like to be limited
[50:43.000 --> 50:50.000]  So they're going to do everything they can to make their lives easier for themselves
[50:50.000 --> 51:02.000]  This stuff of having to do probable cause determinations and having to follow procedural due process was really inconvenient
[51:02.000 --> 51:07.000]  So they went to great lengths to overcome that
[51:07.000 --> 51:14.000]  Our founders, when they created this country, went to great lengths to keep them from overcoming that
[51:14.000 --> 51:22.000]  And it's our job to hold our public officials to the exact same letter of law that they were told us to
[51:22.000 --> 51:38.000]  And in this case, we're alleging that no one can be prosecuted in Texas except on a presentment by a grand jury of your peers
[51:38.000 --> 51:44.000]  But the state, that was real cumbersome and inconvenient
[51:44.000 --> 51:51.000]  And when you get down to misdemeanors, there are lots and lots of misdemeanors
[51:51.000 --> 52:00.000]  And it costs them lots and lots of time to provide citizens with all their due process rights and misdemeanors
[52:00.000 --> 52:03.000]  Especially traffic tickets
[52:03.000 --> 52:15.000]  In Texas, in 2021, the last year we have good numbers, there were nine million criminal complaints filed in Texas
[52:15.000 --> 52:19.000]  Seven million were traffic
[52:19.000 --> 52:25.000]  And the courts say, well, we've got to have a grand jury indictment on a traffic ticket?
[52:25.000 --> 52:29.000]  We've got seven billion of them
[52:29.000 --> 52:34.000]  Man, that is so time consuming, there's no way we can make any money on prosecuting days
[52:34.000 --> 52:43.000]  We'll use up our entire budget, criminal justice budget, trying to enforce traffic tickets
[52:43.000 --> 52:46.000]  That's terrible
[52:46.000 --> 52:50.000]  If we have to do that, we literally can't enforce them
[52:50.000 --> 52:53.000]  We can't afford to
[52:53.000 --> 52:56.000]  So we've got to find some way to fix this
[52:56.000 --> 53:00.000]  We have to find some way to get through all these cases
[53:00.000 --> 53:13.000]  So the courts render these BS rulings that go toward administrative convenience and adjudicated expediency
[53:13.000 --> 53:22.000]  So that the courts and prosecutors can get through the massive stacks of complaints on their desk
[53:23.000 --> 53:29.000]  And we don't give them enough money and enough people to handle all this stuff
[53:29.000 --> 53:32.000]  So they've got to find a way to get all this done
[53:32.000 --> 53:36.000]  So they start cutting corners
[53:36.000 --> 53:43.000]  And when they start cutting corners, they start eliminating protections
[53:43.000 --> 53:51.000]  Right now, the biggest protection they've eliminated is a policeman can charge you with anything he wants to
[53:51.000 --> 53:59.000]  In Texas, no justice of the peace will ever examine the sufficiency of the allegation
[53:59.000 --> 54:07.000]  Everything, it'll just go straight to the court and the court will deny you anything you bring up against them
[54:07.000 --> 54:11.000]  The only thing they care about is you make a deal
[54:11.000 --> 54:14.000]  If you don't make a deal, they're going to bury you
[54:14.000 --> 54:26.000]  Unless if they don't bury you and everybody can try to make a deal, they'll so encumber the courts that they won't be able to get to all of the cases that they have in front of them
[54:26.000 --> 54:29.000]  So I'm not saying they're bad guys
[54:29.000 --> 54:39.000]  I'm saying they're in a position where they've got to find a way to clear their docket and be able to keep the state moving along
[54:39.000 --> 54:45.000]  I guess that's kind of alright, unless you're the guy on the hard end of that
[54:45.000 --> 54:51.000]  Where they screw you over so they can get through their whole docket
[54:51.000 --> 54:54.000]  So I want to put a stop to that
[54:54.000 --> 54:57.000]  Brett, you want to put a stop to that?
[54:57.000 --> 55:00.000]  Looking forward to seeing some justice there
[55:00.000 --> 55:08.000]  I do see we've got some callers here, but before we... I know you wanted to switch, but there's one other thing I wanted to mention to you about this grand jury
[55:08.000 --> 55:16.000]  And that is that there's another angle of approach to the grand jury that we might want to look at
[55:21.000 --> 55:27.000]  The district attorney would like us to think that there's just one way, and he's the only one that has it
[55:27.000 --> 55:35.000]  And you're talking about this second way, which is not a presentment, but it's just giving notice to the grand jury
[55:35.000 --> 55:41.000]  They really don't want you to notice about that, they don't want you to realize you have that, but there's also a third way that's in there
[55:41.000 --> 55:44.000]  Maybe we can talk about that briefly on the other side
[55:44.000 --> 55:47.000]  So, we'll be right back
[56:05.000 --> 56:12.000]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life
[56:12.000 --> 56:17.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:17.000 --> 56:26.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church
[56:26.000 --> 56:39.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102
[56:39.000 --> 56:43.000]  That's 888-551-0102
[56:43.000 --> 56:48.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[56:57.000 --> 57:04.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[57:04.000 --> 57:07.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[57:07.000 --> 57:09.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[57:09.000 --> 57:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[57:15.000 --> 57:17.000]  Privacy is under attack
[57:17.000 --> 57:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[57:21.000 --> 57:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[57:26.000 --> 57:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[57:31.000 --> 57:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[57:34.000 --> 57:41.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[57:41.000 --> 57:44.000]  Start over with Startpage
[57:44.000 --> 57:47.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed
[57:47.000 --> 57:50.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there
[57:50.000 --> 57:53.000]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight
[57:53.000 --> 57:59.000]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent
[57:59.000 --> 58:05.000]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers
[58:05.000 --> 58:08.000]  Third party? Third Amendment? Get it?
[58:08.000 --> 58:16.000]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment
[58:16.000 --> 58:20.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[58:30.000 --> 58:34.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[58:34.000 --> 58:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[58:38.000 --> 58:39.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[58:39.000 --> 58:45.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[58:46.000 --> 58:48.000]  Privacy is under attack
[58:48.000 --> 58:51.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[58:51.000 --> 58:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[58:56.000 --> 59:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[59:01.000 --> 59:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[59:04.000 --> 59:11.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[59:11.000 --> 59:14.000]  Start over with StartPage
[59:15.000 --> 59:21.000]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles
[59:21.000 --> 59:27.000]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure
[59:27.000 --> 59:30.000]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[59:30.000 --> 59:34.000]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security
[59:34.000 --> 59:39.000]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing
[59:39.000 --> 59:46.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells
[59:46.000 --> 59:53.000]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth
[59:53.000 --> 59:58.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly
[01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  These warmongers come by that term rightly
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  I won't pay for the war with my body
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:37.000]  I won't pay for the fun with my body
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  I won't pay for the boys with my money
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  Their whole agenda smells funny
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  I wanna fight in a war of my own
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  Okay, we are back. Brandon Kelton, Brett Fountain. Here's our radio on this, the sixth day of March, two thousand and twenty-six
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  And Brett, you were talking about a third way of getting to the grand jury
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  Yeah, I was just noticing that there are different terminology being used by the legislature
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  In this chapter 20A, which is talking all about the grand jury, 20A of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  We've got not only the issue, the district attorney addressing or presenting, presenting is what it's called, presenting, making a presentment
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  Excuse me
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  Okay, hold on. Let's make a real clear distinction between giving notice of crime under 20A.151
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  051
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  051 and a presentment
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  A presentment is not a transitive verb, you're not presenting something
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  A presentment is a very specific legal thing
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  That's where the prosecutor comes before the grand jury and presents a criminal complaint to them
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  That's not giving notice, that's doing a presentment
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  Right, so those are the two that, the first one is probably the only one that the district attorney would like you to know about
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  The one where he goes to the grand jury and talks to them
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  But this other way that somebody could talk to them is, like you said, giving notice
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  That can be any credible person, as we've covered
[01:02:58.000 --> 01:03:06.000]  There's another way that's mentioned in the legislature and that's over in 20A.104
[01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:11.000]  And it's saying who may address the grand jury
[01:03:11.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  And if you read the language of this, it's saying no person may address the grand jury about a matter before the grand jury
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:26.000]  Other than the attorney representing the state, a witness, that's you
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Or the accused, or suspected person, or the attorney for the accused or suspected person
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  If approved by the attorney representing the state
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  So there's a potential for a few other people there depending on approval
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  But definitely you, as a witness, have this carved out where, as a witness, you may address the grand jury about a matter before the grand jury
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  So when you've given notice
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  Okay, okay
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  That's the first part
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  Yes, 204
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:01.000]  204, okay
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  So you were on 0.051 earlier about giving notice
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  And that would be the first thing to do that we as citizens could do
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  We can give notice
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  By doing so, we are invoking those jurors oath to inquire into the matter
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  It is now before them as a matter of law
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:34.000]  Which means that point 104 here kicks in and you get to address the grand jury about that matter
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  Because you're a witness
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  Brett
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  Not just have facts, you don't just have facts, I mean, not just have information and belief, you have facts, you're a witness
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  Brett, this is what keeps you around
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  This is excellent
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  And I hadn't seen this person who may address the grand jury
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Attorney, a witness, and I'm a witness
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  You are a witness
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  Oh, this is perfect
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  Okay, go ahead, I'll stop interrupting
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  That's all there is to it
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  Just wanted to highlight that there's that other avenue that I'm sure they would love to just
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Let you look at the first part and say no person may address the grand jury and let's let it end right there
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  But it specifically carves out a place for a witness
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  28.104, I got to get that stuck in my brain because
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  No, it does not say you get to make a presentment
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Exactly
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  They would probably like to just start talking about presentment
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  Explain the difference between the two
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  I don't have an explanation
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  It looks to me like from due process, just the layout of the flow
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  It looks to me like addressing a grand jury only happens about a matter that's already before the grand jury
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  So whether or not you were the one that gave notice, that's irrelevant
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  You could step up and say, hey, grand jury, I'm a witness
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  I got something to tell you about this
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  Let me read that
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 28.104
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  Only specific individuals may address the grand jury on matters before it
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  These include the attorney representing the state and witness the accused or suspected person
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  So according to this, as a witness, I have a right to address the grand jury
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  That's what it looks like to me
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  And glaringly, obviously what's missing here is some kind of language that says
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Oh, and by the way, the district attorney is the gatekeeper
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  Yeah, that's what I was going to say
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  I'm looking at this statute and it lists a witness on the same logical level as the attorney representing the state
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  Exactly, which is the precise peer-to-peer language that we see above when it's talking about who may give notice
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  Okay, so now we're at the point to where we give notice to the grand jury of crime
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  And now we get to the duty of the grand jury
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  Yes, they've sworn to inquire into all offenses that came to their notice
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  By way of any member of the grand jury, the prosecuting attorney, or any credible person
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  And that's supported by 28.104
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  Yeah, and if anybody were to try to argue that this matter is not before the grand jury
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  They would be, in effect, accusing the grand jury of violating their oath
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  Oh, wait a minute, that didn't make sense
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  If someone argues that it's not before
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  If the district attorney were to try to prevent you from addressing the grand jury by saying
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  Oh, well, this matter that you're supposedly a witness about, this is not a matter before the grand jury
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  He is essentially telling you he's accusing the grand jury of not keeping their oath
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  Not abiding by what they swore to do, which is to inquire into all those offenses
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  So they should be before the grand jury
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  If he says it's not, then he's accusing that grand jury that is currently impaneled
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  of violating their oath
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  I just had a knee-jerk reaction to that
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  And the knee-jerk reaction was
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:09.000]  Who the hell are you, prosecuting attorney, to raise this issue?
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  This is not even a damn business
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  What makes you think you know what all this is on their plate?
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  I can come in and say, Mr. Prosecutor, you're presenting evidence to the grand jury
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  and you don't have standing to do it
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  And he's going to say, get out of here, I've got standing to do it under
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  the 28.051
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  So, now the prosecutor would say that
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  You, as a witness, don't have standing to give notice of crime
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  and witness to that notice of crime to the grand jury
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  Wait a minute, you're not a member of the grand jury
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  You're a member of the executive branch
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  You are a lawyer employed by the state
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  What standing do you have to raise this issue?
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  Yeah, good point, looks like none
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  Yeah, I can't see any
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  He effectively is a proxy witness
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:27.000]  As the prosecuting attorney
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  He can address facts brought by witnesses
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Making a proxy witness
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  It seems like the only thing he could do
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  In the capacity of a witness would be to speak on behalf of the state
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  Anybody else that actually is a witness needs to be brought forward
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  and put on the stand and get under oath
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  Well, prosecutors, they want to get in front of the grand jury
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  and they want to state this and state that and state the other
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  I'm going to say, oh, wait a minute, hold on
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  You can't present anything to the grand jury unless it's under oath
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  And the only way you can do it under oath is if you have personal knowledge
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Exactly
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  You want to come before the grand jury
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  and do a presentment
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  based on information over which you do not have personal knowledge
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  but you have secondary knowledge
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  by way of interviewing a witness who does have personal knowledge
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:36.000]  And that's reasonable, that's how it should be
[01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:37.000]  Right
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  The prosecutor, he's not engaged in all this stuff
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  He's just a prosecutor
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  And some guy comes to me and tells me that
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  Oh, this happened, that happened, the other happened
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  Yeah, reduce it to writing, have him swear to it
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  Now it's in writing with a signature on it
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Now take that to the grand jury
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  So that goes back to what can you take to the grand jury
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  Your Honor, Mr. Prosecutor
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  This guy's a jackass
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  He is absolutely a no good rotten low down jackass
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Does the prosecutor have standing to bring that to the court?
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  No, that's personal opinion
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  So, what can a prosecutor extract from a witness
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  and bring to the grand jury?
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  That got quiet
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  I'm trying to figure out what is the prosecutor actually authorized to do
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  He can't witness anything because he doesn't know anything
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  Well, but what he can do is give some advice to the grand jury
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  when they're wondering about, you know, what is the law in this particular situation
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  or what's the other thing that he can do
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  He can only do that if the grand jury specifically asks him to
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  Right, but it cars out of space for him to do that
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  Let me see, what was that?
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  What was that?
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  Oh, it was in 20A
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Here it is, 151
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  It says, the grand jury may send for the attorney representing the state
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  and ask that attorney's advice on any matter of law
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  or on any question regarding the discharge of the grand jury's duties
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  So they can send for that DA and say, hey, we need your input on this
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  But it doesn't say that he gets to go in there and just start reaching to him
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  Wait a minute, that means he can't
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  Does that mean he can't present a statement of facts?
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  Well, hold that thought and go to our sponsors
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  Now you can win too
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  I love logos
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  I need my truth fixed
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  I'd be lost without logos
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  How can I help logos?
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  Now, go to logosradio.network.com
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  and logos gets a few pesos
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  No
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  No
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  No
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  I mean, yes
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:53.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  This is perfect
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  Thank you so much
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  We are welcome
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  Happy holidays, logos
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  Go network
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  Ain't gonna blind me
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  Don't bore me
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  You put the fear in my pockets
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  Took money from my hand
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  Ain't gonna drop me with that same old sucker punch
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  I get it now but then I must have been out of your touch
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  Now, can you have room to me
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  Now, you can't get me with that same old trick again
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  We have a bunch of callers on the board
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:42.000]  So instead of torturing you anymore
[01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  We're gonna go to Roger in Wisconsin
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Roger, what do you have for us today?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  Yes, salutations guys and great show
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  I have two questions in comment
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  One pertaining to grand jury and the second jury notification
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:04.000]  Now, going back to the beginning of your show
[01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:08.000]  With the grand jury and credible witness
[01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  What if a convicted felon, wrongfully I must say also
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  Because there's a lot of court corruption these days
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  Evidence being 250 judges being arrested out there southwest
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  But standing along with a credible witness
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Can a convicted felon give notice to a grand jury?
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Wait, say that again
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  Standing along with a credible witness or witnesses
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  Pluraly like a class action somewhat
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Can a convicted felon along with those witnesses
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Give notice to grand jury?
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  It does not give
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:08.000]  The legislative language excludes him or let's put it this way
[01:19:08.000 --> 01:19:16.000]  It only guarantees that right to someone who is categorized as the credible person
[01:19:16.000 --> 01:19:21.000]  So it would be like if you have people who are credible
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:25.000]  And then someone who's not credible saying the same thing
[01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  You're believing that thing because of the credible people
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:34.000]  Not because of the person who was not credible, right?
[01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  The fact that he's saying the same thing doesn't really add any weight to it
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Because he wasn't credible by himself
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  But if the convicted felon was basically say harmed in some way
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  And he's seeking remedy criminally
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  And he has credible witness or witnesses clearly
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  Like a class action somewhat
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  Because the main focus of the investigation after giving notice
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:18.000]  Would be pertaining to a convicted felon
[01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Well, the convicted felon doesn't have the guaranteed right to go and give notice to the grand jury
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  However, some of these other people who are
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  You said if there were multiple people it's like a class action
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  Some of these other people who are not a convicted felon
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  They can give notice to the grand jury
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  And then they can interview this guy, this convicted felon
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  They can interview him, get him under oath
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  And he can still give testimony
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  But it will be the testimony of somebody who had no right himself to come to the grand jury
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  But they can still interview him and get his testimony under oath, of course
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  Okay, so then the next question would be
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  Pertaining to jury nullifications for a lot of these
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  It's beyond reasonable doubt about the fact that in the U.S. we have a lot of court corruption going on
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  That's been pretty well evident
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  And there's a lot of wrongfully convicted felons out there
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  Now, even after post-conviction release
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  How does jury nullification, would that even come into play
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  Or does it have to be within the initial trial?
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  Post-conviction? No, I would think that's irrelevant
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  And just for our listeners who don't understand yet what is jury nullification
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  Let's just touch that real quickly
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  That's when the jury, having heard all the facts and law in the case
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  They're coming to the decision that they're going to render a not guilty verdict
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  And it's not because they don't think that the facts line up with the essential elements
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  They're rendering a not guilty verdict because they think that that law is wrong
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  They think that for some kind of moral or ethical reasons
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  They can look at this law and say, that's not right
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  I'm not going to punish this person
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  Even though, okay, maybe technically he could be accused of this
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  And technically those facts do line up to these essential elements
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  But we're still going to say he's not guilty
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  Because the law is, we find a problem with that law
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  And so they effectively nullify that law, take its teeth away
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  And so what you're asking about is post-conviction though
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  So after somebody has been convicted, that means the jury's not involved anymore
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  There's already been a conviction
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  So there wouldn't be a place for jury nullification
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  The jury doesn't have a chance to come back later after somebody's been convicted
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  And say, you know what, we changed our mind
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  There's no facility for such a thing
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  Okay, so a convicted zone after exhausting all appeals and everything
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  And post-conviction and relief
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  Because basically the only other thing would be a presidential pardon
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  I mean
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  Yeah, there could be a pardon, right?
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  But I mean, other than that, there's nothing that a convicted felon can pursue
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  Nothing else comes to my mind
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  Can you think of anything besides a pardon?
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Well, you know, maybe one other thing that you could do
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  That that hypothetical convicted felon could do
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  Is to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in which that ruling was given
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  If the court, I mean, obviously, if you're not being frivolous about it
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  But if the court had no jurisdiction to hear it
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  For example, in Texas, they go through with a whole lot of court proceedings
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  And all the way to the conviction and sentencing and people end up in prison
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  And there was never any paperwork to start the case
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  So essentially the court never had jurisdiction to begin with
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  They went through all the dancing and everything just like the court did have jurisdiction
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  But the lack of subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  No matter how remote in history
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  So if the court didn't have jurisdiction, then that would be potentially a second way
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  In addition to the pardon angle, you could go for the challenge of original, the challenge of jurisdiction
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  And a patriot citizen or whatever does not apply, need not apply or whatever
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  I'm sorry, I don't understand that question
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  Well, you know, on social media, you see a lot of the patriot that Randy calls it
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  Patriot, the Patronauts or something
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  And like the living man on the land
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  I like Eddie Gregg's word for it. He says they're Patridiates
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Randy might get a kick out of this, my comment, and I'll get off after that
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  So you go there and the bailiff asks you, okay, what are you here for?
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  I want to give notice to the grand jury
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  And then he tells you you must go through the district attorney
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  And then it's like you're giving notice of a criminal complaint against the district attorney
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  The same one that they've been directed to
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Yeah, sounds absurd, doesn't it?
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Yeah, and then Randy has that special procedure with the envelope and everything
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Yeah, all right, let's talk about that some more on the other side
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  Hold on, hold that thought, we'll be right back
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  Privacy is under attack
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  Start over with StartPage
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:01.000]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all
[01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  I'm a structural engineer
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:52.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  I'm the father who lost his son
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  ...to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  Music
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  Music
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Music
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  Music
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Music
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  Music
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  Music
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  Music
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  Music
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Music
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  Music
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  Music
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  Music
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:29.000]  Music
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  Music
[01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  Music
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  Music
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Music
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  Music
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:59.000]  Music
[01:31:59.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Music
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Music
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Music
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  So anyways
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  Say hypothetically some person that's quite
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  pedantic and learned in the rule of law
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  and also Randy's special procedure on how to trip up
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  the prosecutors or whatever
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  The bailiff tells them will you have to take your grand jury notice
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  to the prosecutor and it just so happens that
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  the criminal complaint or accusation is
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  that particular prosecutor in that county
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  or anywhere in the state and so you have your
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  special procedure with the envelope and the postmaster general and all of that
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  lined up and ready to go and you know
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:19.000]  that you could go directly to the grand jury, you have the right to do that
[01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:24.000]  but instead you play that game where you give the
[01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  prosecuting attorney the complaint
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  that's giving notice to the grand jury about him
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  or her
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  That has been a problem because while grand juries are created by legislation
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  and all this processes are legislatively
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  created, there's almost nothing in the codes
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  that says a citizen may give notice to a grand jury
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  We have to imply that because I am a citizen
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  and I may do anything I want to unless
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  some law, some statute forbids me to do it
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  So now I wind up going back to the courts and say wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm here to give notice to the grand jury
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  You can't do that and I'm going to say sure I can, I can do anything that I'm not forbidden to do
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  and it gets into this gray area. That's what we're struggling with
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  This difference between a citizen and a
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  public official. A public official may
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  only do what he is specifically authorized to do
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  and a citizen may do anything they want to
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  unless they are specifically forbidden to do it
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  So Brett, how do we traverse this
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  access to grand juries when it is
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  of, what's the word, it's critically
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  important to the prosecutor to be able to control access to the grand jury
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  because he doesn't want to get an indictment over something he can't
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  prosecute. He feels like he should be in the middle of this
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  But our legislator said
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  you should not be in the middle of this. You are a prosecutor
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  You are a lawyer for the state and you don't get to
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  determine whether or not a criminal complaint gets presented to the grand jury
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Right, it never gives them that place
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  And whether or not a citizen can give notice to a grand jury
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  Prosecutors want to do that and they want to say hey I'm the only one that can do that
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  They want to block us
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  Yeah, but the legislation never made any such distinction
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  Yeah, and that goes to some of my primary retorts
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  Where did you come up with that? Did you just make that up?
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  You can't go to the grand jury
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  They think it's real cool when you ask them if they made it up
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  It just seems like that's one of their favorite things to hear
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:40.000]  First time I did that was
[01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  a prosecutor for a Decatur, Texas, the city
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  up for me and he's telling me that I can't go to the
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  that I can't speak for someone who has a criminal
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  accusation against him and I said
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  would you come up with that? Did you just make that up?
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  He stood there and it caused this whole interruption
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  And he just dares, yeah, that's what I get
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  They can't figure out whether to be mad or what
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  They give this look like they're thinking
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  if I ask the bailiff to shoot this guy, can I get away with it?
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  My question was
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  if somebody like Randy went and they told them
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  give notice to the prosecuting attorney or the DA
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  and you go, okay, and that notice
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  that's going to go to the grand jury is about that particular
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  DA or prosecuting attorney and it's a criminal complaint
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  or something serious like sedition or treason
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  or whatever or male peasants
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  and then you have, like Randy, you told that you have that special procedure
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  with the envelope and the postmaster general
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  can get involved if it's not presented
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  or given notice to the grand jury
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  Did I miss something there, Brett?
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  I don't know, I couldn't get to the question mark yet
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  And my brain didn't have an automatic response to it
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  What if the notice is about the district attorney
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  that you're supposed to be giving you a directive to give the information to?
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  It's common sense that the district attorney can't be the gatekeeper
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  for whether he himself gets convicted or indicted of a crime
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Obviously that makes no sense, you couldn't have that, that would be absurd
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  Thank you
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  I can only speak specifically to Texas law
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  If I have reasonable probable cause
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  to believe that a crime has been committed, I'm a citizen in a republic
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  That's kind of like a CEO
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:40.000]  of a corporation and the state being the corporation
[01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  I'm the CEO and I have knowledge that a crime has been committed
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  Who can determine
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  who has the power to determine whether or not I can give notice
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  to a grand jury of this crime?
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  A CEO has access to all of his agents
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  A CEO will typically do things in a command structure
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  A way that respects the command structure
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  But the CEO has access to every single agent
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  He's the principal
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  I would connect that to the grand jury
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  The CEO could go to the DA, the CEO could also go to a peace officer
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  The CEO could also go to a grand jury
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  The CEO could recognize what seems appropriate and what he feels like at the moment
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  They all have a duty to act in certain ways when presented with these things
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  So we the people ought to be able to go to any one of them that seems appropriate, including the grand jury
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  And anyone who says you can't do that
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  You can get employees with doctors, medications, emergency care and teledoc all at zero cost
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  with zero co-pay
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value or pay down lines of credit
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  The affordable, easy to understand 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  C'mon Jerry, sing reality
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  Sing Jerry, c'mon
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  As we sow
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  So shall we reap
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  So many fruits, so many worms
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  So many crucial words get put on hold while we see
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Try as we will, take small steps to try and reach
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  As we soar, so shall we reach
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:10.000]  Okay, we are back. We're in Denver, California.
[01:44:10.000 --> 01:44:16.000]  And, uh, Brett and I have been discussing this on the break.
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  And, uh, frankly, Roger, where were we?
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Presented that, um, I remember you speaking, uh,
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  Giving criminal complaints about public officials.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  And I do wonder if you ever, uh, filed a criminal complaint against a prosecuting attorney or anything.
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:51.000]  Oh, have I ever? I've done those by the stack.
[01:44:51.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Okay, so have you ever given notice to a grand jury through the,
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Um, prosecuting attorney that you're making this criminal complaint about?
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Oh, yes, I did. And it was so much fun.
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  Actually, this wasn't through the grand jury.
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:17.000]  I went to the hearing, uh, in Johnson County, Texas.
[01:45:17.000 --> 01:45:22.000]  They had a grand jury every three weeks.
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:33.000]  It was the third, the third week, the third, I think, Monday or Tuesday of the county.
[01:45:33.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  And I went down to the grand jury and actually presented the district attorney to the grand jury.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  But that was a struggle, you know.
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:55.000]  Johnson County had things set up where I could sneak in underneath them and do that.
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  The other counties are blocking access to the grand jury at every turn.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:07.000]  And that's one of the real things I want to get after. I want that stopped.
[01:46:07.000 --> 01:46:11.000]  Do you mean you gave notice or you gave a presentment?
[01:46:11.000 --> 01:46:18.000]  Notice, notice. I have no, I cannot, as a matter of right, give a presentment.
[01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  I can give a presentment if I am specifically requested to do so or specifically authorized to do so.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  And those who are listening, a presentment as opposed to a criminal affidavit.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  I can't, let's see, this is complicated.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  I can do a presentment as opposed to a notice of crime.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  I can do a presentment if the grand jury calls me to the stand and asks me to do so.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  But if they did that, the only definition of doing a presentment to a grand jury goes to giving notice of crime to the grand jury.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  What's the difference, Britt, between a presentment and notice of crime?
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  That's a good question. I don't see a legislative definition.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  The only thing that stands out to me is to look at it in the flow and say, here's this elected official who is, we the people elected him to fill a dotted line here.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  That dotted line was hired to represent the state, and we elected him to fill that role.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  In that role, there are certain few things he gets to do, and that's what he tends to do on a daily basis.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  That's different from somebody who has personal knowledge.
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  He can't give notice because he doesn't know anything.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  Giving notice to me involves the one-off things that some random person, not in that dotted line role, needs to go to the grand jury because that person does know something.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  They have personal knowledge of something, and they need to give notice to the grand jury.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  That's what stands out to me. It's not legislatively defined that way, but just looking at the roles, that's how it looks to me.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  In the instance that you cited, Brandy, they did give you a directive to give a presentment?
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  Wait, I couldn't hear that, Britt.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  He's wondering if they directed you to give a presentment.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  No, they did not. They did in Johnson County.
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  They allowed me to do a presentation or a presentment to the grand jury, but I had to bushwhack them in the court and put them on the dime and force them to do that.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  So, presentment as to notice, what is the difference?
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  If I'm asked that question, I'm going to say, good question, because I don't know of anything in statutory law that defines a presentment as opposed to a criminal affidavit.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  A criminal affidavit is required to show more detail, but there's nothing that I can find that when I give a criminal complaint to a district or county clerk, there's nothing that I know of that allows that clerk to categorize my presentation as something else.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  Well, yeah, especially if you have personal knowledge.
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  It's one thing if you're giving notice of a crime, but all you have is information and belief.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  That's still a sworn statement, and you ought to be able to present it, but it seems even more strong when you're bringing it based on personal knowledge.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  How can they turn that down?
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  That's the only thing, technically, I can witness to.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  I can witness to what I personally saw or heard, but I can also witness to something that I could hear that everybody else couldn't hear.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  That's what I had a specific reason to go there.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  So when you draw the line between personal knowledge and mere information and belief, then that cuts out the third way to address the grand jury in point 104.
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  That cuts out that because if you can't testify to something that you're an eyewitness to, you've seen and heard, you know this from personal knowledge,
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  then you're not in that category of who gets to address the grand jury per 28.104.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  You might still be in the first category of giving notice 0.051, and certainly you could be called in by the grand jury for whatever reason, but you wouldn't be able to just go address them.
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  Right. So when I give the statement...
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  Man, I lost that term again.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  I can give...
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  Presentment?
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  No, I was listening. I'm trying to do something really technical. I got a grand jury here.
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  What's the difference between me doing a presentment to the grand jury and giving notice of crime to the grand jury?
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  And how does that affect the duty of the grand jury?
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  I say, I saw this guy do this dirty rotten stuff, blah, blah, blah.
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  Does the grand jury have to...
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  How do they interpolate that into specific stature?
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  I'm struggling here. This is a complicated spot.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  What is the duty of the grand jury and what do I have to give them so they can act?
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  Their duty is to inquire into the matter.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  Yeah.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  A presentment as opposed to notice.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  Where is the line drawn?
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  I'm confusing myself here.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  I'm trying to find a way to state this so it's clear, but I don't really have it exactly clear in my own mind.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  So that when a prosecutor jumps up and raises an objection, how do I counter?
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  So I'm giving notice of crime to a grand jury.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  Can I tell the grand jury only facts or can I tell the grand jury my interpretation of those facts?
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  So that the grand jury can hear what I have to say and either accept it or not accept it.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  Can a prosecutor object to that? Can he control what I can tell the grand jury because they absolutely want to do that?
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  Okay, we're not getting anywhere and we've got other people on the line.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  I think I've kind of boxed myself into a corner.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  Especially if you're giving a criminal complaint about the prosecutor himself.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  He really wants to get in the way of that, right?
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  Yeah, they hate it when you do that.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  But that doesn't change the duty of the prosecutor.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  He doesn't grant him any special duty.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  Well, Roger, do you have anything else for the other side?
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors again.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  And do you have anything else?
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  Thanks for taking my call. You guys are great. Okay. Great show.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  No, I'm not good. I confuse myself.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  Well, it's good talking with you. Thanks for calling in.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  All right. On the other side, we're going to go to Sam in Texas.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  And we see you there, Chris, in Colorado. We'll get to you as well.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  If anybody else wants to call in, there'll be another spot here on the board.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  It's 512-646-1984.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  And I'll try to be a little more coherent. I choose myself.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes,
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  Start over with startpage.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  S-P-A-R with an extra P.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:48.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:58:48.000 --> 01:58:52.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish.
[01:58:52.000 --> 01:58:57.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:58:57.000 --> 01:59:00.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:59:00.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:16.000]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[01:59:16.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:22.000]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[01:59:22.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:29.000]  Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[01:59:29.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:34.000]  when he said,
[01:59:48.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  Privacy has proved to always be possible.
[01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:56.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:00:18.000 --> 02:00:20.000]  Thank you.
[02:00:48.000 --> 02:00:53.000]  All right.
[02:00:53.000 --> 02:00:55.000]  Welcome back to the Rule of Law Radio.
[02:00:55.000 --> 02:00:58.000]  Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain.
[02:00:58.000 --> 02:01:03.000]  And this is Friday, the 6th of March, 2026.
[02:01:03.000 --> 02:01:07.000]  We are going to Chris in Colorado.
[02:01:07.000 --> 02:01:12.000]  We did have Sam in Texas, but Sam, I don't know, I guess you dropped off.
[02:01:12.000 --> 02:01:15.000]  We'll look forward to talking with you if you can call back.
[02:01:15.000 --> 02:01:18.000]  We're going right now to Chris in Colorado.
[02:01:18.000 --> 02:01:21.000]  Good evening, Chris. What's on your mind?
[02:01:21.000 --> 02:01:26.000]  Hey, Brett. Well, bed's on my mind, but I hung in there.
[02:01:26.000 --> 02:01:28.000]  Thank you.
[02:01:28.000 --> 02:01:30.000]  How are you guys?
[02:01:30.000 --> 02:01:32.000]  Doing well.
[02:01:32.000 --> 02:01:34.000]  Good.
[02:01:34.000 --> 02:01:40.000]  Well, I had a whole lofty idea of going through a process to kind of
[02:01:40.000 --> 02:01:41.000]  get some basics.
[02:01:41.000 --> 02:01:45.000]  When you guys talk about the grand jury, it really gets me thinking a lot.
[02:01:45.000 --> 02:01:54.000]  And so many of us that are at different levels of getting to that understanding of how process should work.
[02:01:54.000 --> 02:02:00.000]  And locally, I'm figuring out kind of where the district attorney is supposed to lay,
[02:02:00.000 --> 02:02:03.000]  where I'm supposed to lay as a defendant if I'm accused of a crime,
[02:02:03.000 --> 02:02:05.000]  and how the court is supposed to interact with us.
[02:02:05.000 --> 02:02:07.000]  I'm learning that process.
[02:02:07.000 --> 02:02:13.000]  And it's not super overcomplicated, but they've made it pretty complex.
[02:02:13.000 --> 02:02:17.000]  So that was my lofty idea is to encourage people to get a blueprint.
[02:02:17.000 --> 02:02:26.000]  I wanted to get a blueprint to start, let's say you're accused of a misdemeanor, petty offense, class one, moving up a little bit.
[02:02:26.000 --> 02:02:30.000]  And what do you know about what's supposed to happen with you?
[02:02:30.000 --> 02:02:33.000]  Because most people don't.
[02:02:33.000 --> 02:02:39.000]  But as we were talking, I was really getting fired up about this societal disconnect,
[02:02:39.000 --> 02:02:44.000]  that basically what you're implying here, what is a DA's role?
[02:02:44.000 --> 02:02:48.000]  And it's a pretty simple role from what I understand.
[02:02:48.000 --> 02:03:02.000]  They're allowed to do anything that has to do with the judicial phase of prosecution.
[02:03:02.000 --> 02:03:10.000]  Anything outside of that is not considered their protective role.
[02:03:10.000 --> 02:03:14.000]  But this disconnect, I was looking at Imbler v. Packman again, it specifically says,
[02:03:14.000 --> 02:03:17.000]  it doesn't even matter even if they did some things maliciously.
[02:03:17.000 --> 02:03:25.000]  If they're doing what they can within the prosecution, presenting evidence, presenting facts, presenting the prosecution of the state, they're immune, fine.
[02:03:25.000 --> 02:03:32.000]  But what that court denied was the consideration of administrative acts, things outside of it.
[02:03:32.000 --> 02:03:34.000]  And this is where the disconnect comes in.
[02:03:34.000 --> 02:03:38.000]  It gets from top bottom, and we're also not fully prepared ourselves.
[02:03:38.000 --> 02:03:47.000]  The top believes that case now is applied in a way that anything a prosecutor does,
[02:03:47.000 --> 02:03:52.000]  brushing his teeth in the bathroom when he gets to work, is immune,
[02:03:52.000 --> 02:03:58.000]  instead of the very specific acts that it actually spells out, which he is allowed to do as a prosecutor.
[02:03:58.000 --> 02:04:05.000]  Right. He can shoot people in the grocery store. He's a prosecutor, so he's immune.
[02:04:05.000 --> 02:04:07.000]  I've said examples like that in the GPT before.
[02:04:07.000 --> 02:04:13.000]  Like, yeah, could he just pull a gun and beat the crap out of me or pistol whip me in the office?
[02:04:13.000 --> 02:04:17.000]  It's like, oh, no, that's the line. Well, then how do we define these lines?
[02:04:17.000 --> 02:04:20.000]  Because now we're in the opposite direction.
[02:04:20.000 --> 02:04:26.000]  So we have that disconnect. And then I wanted to share what I did this past couple of weeks.
[02:04:26.000 --> 02:04:35.000]  I have been trying to get a hold of the ACLU because they're supposed to be this regional organization that upholds citizen rights.
[02:04:35.000 --> 02:04:38.000]  They go to town for the rights of the people, right?
[02:04:38.000 --> 02:04:44.000]  And they're more interested in systemic, broader issues than the individual, but sometimes they do help the individual.
[02:04:45.000 --> 02:04:54.000]  All right. Well, in 2010, there was a case here in Colorado about this very issue involving criminal accusations in the DA.
[02:04:54.000 --> 02:05:01.000]  And the DA was meeting with unrepresented defendants before a judge really got involved.
[02:05:01.000 --> 02:05:09.000]  That's never been allowed. But Colorado came down hard in 2013 and specifically said, it's not allowed.
[02:05:09.000 --> 02:05:17.000]  And they hardened the law that was already there, and they tied it directly to the Supreme Court in 2013.
[02:05:17.000 --> 02:05:21.000]  Part of the spearheading of that was the ACLU.
[02:05:21.000 --> 02:05:33.000]  They basically gave endorsement of that action to which two other kind of local organization of attorneys jumped in and fought for that amendment.
[02:05:33.000 --> 02:05:37.000]  And the legislator then followed up. And we have an updated law.
[02:05:38.000 --> 02:05:40.000]  So wonderful, right?
[02:05:40.000 --> 02:05:52.000]  Ten years later, I'm bringing a case that actually is pointing out that that law hasn't been followed in our county since 2013, and the ACLU thinks it's not interesting.
[02:05:55.000 --> 02:06:02.000]  They would rather, like they said to me, we have more important things like upholding the law to protect people who are here illegally.
[02:06:02.000 --> 02:06:08.000]  That's basically what they're saying is they're trying to get laws upheld for immigration.
[02:06:08.000 --> 02:06:17.000]  And I understand that's part of the times, but I just found it really dumbfounding that these people started this whole process to protect individuals from the DA.
[02:06:17.000 --> 02:06:21.000]  And then in the end, they think they don't want to uphold it.
[02:06:21.000 --> 02:06:23.000]  This is a disconnect where I don't...
[02:06:23.000 --> 02:06:27.000]  I wouldn't necessarily see it as being that they don't want to.
[02:06:28.000 --> 02:06:31.000]  I mean, they have limited resources just like anybody else.
[02:06:31.000 --> 02:06:41.000]  And if they're trying to, like they may look at it like, hey, we got that framework put in place and even hardened for you to go and argue this on your own.
[02:06:41.000 --> 02:06:44.000]  Go ahead. Do it. You handle it.
[02:06:44.000 --> 02:06:49.000]  We're fighting another battle for getting a different framework set up.
[02:06:49.000 --> 02:06:54.000]  And now that we've done our part, you can go and depend on that.
[02:06:54.000 --> 02:06:55.000]  You can go rely on that.
[02:06:55.000 --> 02:06:56.000]  Go argue it.
[02:06:56.000 --> 02:06:59.000]  Go call it judicial error that needs to be reversed.
[02:06:59.000 --> 02:07:01.000]  You go handle it.
[02:07:03.000 --> 02:07:04.000]  Fair enough.
[02:07:04.000 --> 02:07:06.000]  And that's a good point.
[02:07:06.000 --> 02:07:08.000]  I think I fit that category.
[02:07:08.000 --> 02:07:10.000]  I'm going to do it.
[02:07:10.000 --> 02:07:11.000]  But I find it...
[02:07:11.000 --> 02:07:12.000]  I don't know.
[02:07:12.000 --> 02:07:15.000]  I just find that disconnect kind of troublesome.
[02:07:15.000 --> 02:07:16.000]  Okay.
[02:07:16.000 --> 02:07:18.000]  And then back to my third visit to the...
[02:07:18.000 --> 02:07:20.000]  I had to go find out the DA's name.
[02:07:20.000 --> 02:07:22.000]  That's what the judge has tasked me now.
[02:07:22.000 --> 02:07:25.000]  He wants me to really double down in front.
[02:07:25.000 --> 02:07:27.000]  He's giving me 45 days to figure out who this DA is.
[02:07:27.000 --> 02:07:28.000]  And I'm getting closer.
[02:07:28.000 --> 02:07:30.000]  But they don't keep much records.
[02:07:30.000 --> 02:07:34.000]  And so I decided to just walk in back into this first appearance at this court.
[02:07:34.000 --> 02:07:40.000]  And I'm walking through and it's kind of surreal the second time because nobody even looks up to see who you are.
[02:07:40.000 --> 02:07:46.000]  And the first time there's a possibility of jail time, right?
[02:07:46.000 --> 02:07:50.000]  But it looks like a DMD office.
[02:07:50.000 --> 02:07:52.000]  It really does.
[02:07:52.000 --> 02:08:00.000]  And I happen to walk by the room, the original room, where the judge, air quotes, advised us through a video.
[02:08:00.000 --> 02:08:05.000]  And it literally says on the placard, video advisement.
[02:08:05.000 --> 02:08:11.000]  And I go over to the clerk and he says, oh, yeah, this is where we have our arraignments for whatever.
[02:08:11.000 --> 02:08:13.000]  I think they actually think it's an arraignment set up.
[02:08:13.000 --> 02:08:17.000]  And I just couldn't believe I was actually hearing this.
[02:08:17.000 --> 02:08:19.000]  He had no idea what an actual arraignment was.
[02:08:19.000 --> 02:08:21.000]  None of them do.
[02:08:21.000 --> 02:08:24.000]  So, you know, I plan to address this.
[02:08:24.000 --> 02:08:29.000]  But I want to think of it in a way that where did the disconnect come?
[02:08:29.000 --> 02:08:31.000]  Like, Randy's really going after it.
[02:08:31.000 --> 02:08:33.000]  Like, we got completely disconnected from this grand jury thing.
[02:08:33.000 --> 02:08:34.000]  And it sounds plausible.
[02:08:34.000 --> 02:08:35.000]  It sounds legitimate.
[02:08:35.000 --> 02:08:40.000]  Like, we used to have access to a grand jury, apparently.
[02:08:40.000 --> 02:08:41.000]  Yeah.
[02:08:41.000 --> 02:08:44.000]  And we should.
[02:08:44.000 --> 02:08:50.000]  And now it's been turned into this other, you know, mechanism beast.
[02:08:50.000 --> 02:08:57.000]  And I'm looking for some ways to not react and some ways to tie it together because I actually have a platform now.
[02:08:57.000 --> 02:09:00.000]  I have a case where I can speak about this.
[02:09:00.000 --> 02:09:08.000]  And I think that's a really healthy way to look at a situation like that.
[02:09:08.000 --> 02:09:11.000]  You just said, now I have a platform.
[02:09:11.000 --> 02:09:13.000]  Now I can speak to this issue.
[02:09:13.000 --> 02:09:23.000]  I really wish a lot more people would have that kind of perspective and say, instead of, oh, my goodness, they're mistreating me.
[02:09:23.000 --> 02:09:24.000]  Everything's lost.
[02:09:24.000 --> 02:09:25.000]  There's no hope.
[02:09:25.000 --> 02:09:26.000]  We can't do anything.
[02:09:26.000 --> 02:09:28.000]  We can't fight city hall.
[02:09:28.000 --> 02:09:34.000]  But you're looking at it like, now I have a voice.
[02:09:34.000 --> 02:09:36.000]  That's great.
[02:09:36.000 --> 02:09:37.000]  Yeah.
[02:09:37.000 --> 02:09:40.000]  Well, maybe I had to fight like hell to get there.
[02:09:40.000 --> 02:09:43.000]  But yeah, now I may have a voice here.
[02:09:43.000 --> 02:10:02.000]  And I want the courts to see that there is somebody looking at everything in a rational way and maybe spark them to get some of that societal disconnect off of their shoulder because it comes across as arrogant.
[02:10:02.000 --> 02:10:04.000]  Like, we know everything because we're the judges and lawyers.
[02:10:04.000 --> 02:10:05.000]  No, they don't.
[02:10:05.000 --> 02:10:08.000]  And actually have a conversation about it.
[02:10:08.000 --> 02:10:11.000]  And I don't know.
[02:10:11.000 --> 02:10:21.000]  If you guys had a success with actually talking to the judge in a civil manner and the attorneys in a civil manner and actually having a conversation about what's wrong and having them go, huh, little head cock.
[02:10:21.000 --> 02:10:22.000]  Maybe I was doing that wrong.
[02:10:23.000 --> 02:10:35.000]  Are they just so blazingly, I don't know, delusional that we can't get through to them?
[02:10:35.000 --> 02:10:40.000]  Yeah, I've never seen any success by just talking to them like that.
[02:10:40.000 --> 02:10:45.000]  Not when I have a case that's still active.
[02:10:45.000 --> 02:11:10.000]  Now, I have had some of what I would consider fruitful conversations and even from some friendships have developed after that with judges who really respected what I had to say and would encourage me to continue.
[02:11:10.000 --> 02:11:12.000]  However, it wasn't about my case anymore.
[02:11:12.000 --> 02:11:24.000]  It was to the point where they were, I guess they felt free that they could have these kinds of conversations, you know, during the part where it's about my case.
[02:11:24.000 --> 02:11:26.000]  I can't have those conversations.
[02:11:26.000 --> 02:11:30.000]  It would probably be considered improper ex parte anyway.
[02:11:30.000 --> 02:11:40.000]  And they do go up and push back and and act like they know everything and act like I can't teach them anything.
[02:11:40.000 --> 02:11:42.000]  And yeah, that's that's pretty much standard.
[02:11:42.000 --> 02:11:43.000]  It's par for the course.
[02:11:43.000 --> 02:11:46.000]  I'm not a bar guard member, so I have nothing to say.
[02:11:46.000 --> 02:11:49.000]  That's typically how they look at it.
[02:11:49.000 --> 02:11:59.000]  It's unfortunate because, I mean, a lot of the laws are they're really clear and easy to read.
[02:11:59.000 --> 02:12:02.000]  And they're not vague.
[02:12:02.000 --> 02:12:04.000]  They're not ambiguous.
[02:12:04.000 --> 02:12:11.000]  Anybody with the brain can look at it and read it and know what it's supposed to what's supposed to happen in that particular situation.
[02:12:11.000 --> 02:12:14.000]  Court rules are the same way they're laid out.
[02:12:14.000 --> 02:12:17.000]  They should apply equally to both sides.
[02:12:17.000 --> 02:12:25.000]  But as it is, unfortunately, there's a strong bias if fitting on whether you're pro se.
[02:12:25.000 --> 02:12:39.000]  So, yes, I can see some success in having those heart to heart conversations with judges and occasionally the attorneys.
[02:12:39.000 --> 02:12:45.000]  But that's even more rare.
[02:12:45.000 --> 02:12:52.000]  But like I said, just it's after the case is over and it's not pertinent anymore.
[02:12:52.000 --> 02:13:02.000]  You know, yeah, but the point, you know, I guess the concern is we need to get to the pertinent parts when we have, you know, a chance.
[02:13:02.000 --> 02:13:04.000]  And right.
[02:13:04.000 --> 02:13:10.000]  So the only thing that I've seen that works for that is is fighting them back like a tiger.
[02:13:10.000 --> 02:13:12.000]  They want to fight like a tiger.
[02:13:12.000 --> 02:13:13.000]  Fine.
[02:13:13.000 --> 02:13:14.000]  You wanted a war.
[02:13:14.000 --> 02:13:17.000]  You got to.
[02:13:17.000 --> 02:13:22.000]  And going back after them with everything you've got.
[02:13:22.000 --> 02:13:25.000]  Yes, it means staying up late at night and reading boring stuff.
[02:13:25.000 --> 02:13:29.000]  Yes, it means writing documents when you'd rather be playing frisbee with your kids.
[02:13:29.000 --> 02:13:44.000]  But it is the only way that I've ever seen that gets them to back down and stop the behavior that they won't ever tell you that you won because you rip their heads off and embarrass them.
[02:13:44.000 --> 02:13:48.000]  And they won't tell you all that stuff, but it makes the case go away.
[02:13:48.000 --> 02:13:52.000]  It's the only thing that makes things go poof.
[02:13:52.000 --> 02:13:55.000]  As far as I've ever seen.
[02:13:55.000 --> 02:13:57.000]  Yeah, I agree.
[02:13:57.000 --> 02:13:58.000]  All right, hold on.
[02:13:58.000 --> 02:13:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[02:13:59.000 --> 02:14:04.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[02:14:04.000 --> 02:14:07.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[02:14:07.000 --> 02:14:11.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors.
[02:14:11.000 --> 02:14:13.000]  And now you can win too.
[02:14:13.000 --> 02:14:19.000]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[02:14:19.000 --> 02:14:23.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons.
[02:14:23.000 --> 02:14:25.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[02:14:25.000 --> 02:14:27.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[02:14:27.000 --> 02:14:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[02:14:32.000 --> 02:14:37.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[02:14:37.000 --> 02:14:39.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[02:14:39.000 --> 02:14:45.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[02:14:45.000 --> 02:14:48.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[02:14:48.000 --> 02:14:50.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[02:14:50.000 --> 02:14:59.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[02:14:59.000 --> 02:15:03.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[02:15:03.000 --> 02:15:06.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[02:15:06.000 --> 02:15:11.000]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[02:15:11.000 --> 02:15:18.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[02:15:18.000 --> 02:15:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[02:15:24.000 --> 02:15:34.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[02:15:34.000 --> 02:15:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[02:15:39.000 --> 02:15:49.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[02:15:49.000 --> 02:15:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[02:15:53.000 --> 02:15:58.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[02:15:59.000 --> 02:16:04.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[02:16:04.000 --> 02:16:07.000]  Logosradionetwork.com
[02:16:10.000 --> 02:16:13.000]  Well, don't let nothing get to you.
[02:16:13.000 --> 02:16:16.000]  Only the Father can deliver you.
[02:16:16.000 --> 02:16:19.000]  So don't let bad mind people hurt you.
[02:16:19.000 --> 02:16:22.000]  And tell Satan, get behind you.
[02:16:22.000 --> 02:16:24.000]  Know what I mean?
[02:16:24.000 --> 02:16:26.000]  My friend.
[02:16:26.000 --> 02:16:28.000]  And all of your children, come on.
[02:16:56.000 --> 02:17:15.000]  All right, welcome back to the Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain.
[02:17:15.000 --> 02:17:23.000]  And we are talking with Chris in Colorado about how we can see some success.
[02:17:23.000 --> 02:17:32.000]  And like I was telling you, I haven't really seen a good way to get through to that.
[02:17:32.000 --> 02:17:40.000]  You're talking about judges and attorneys and whether or not we can ever get them to sit back and say, oh, maybe you're right.
[02:17:40.000 --> 02:17:43.000]  Maybe I have been doing this all wrong.
[02:17:43.000 --> 02:17:50.000]  And I'll tell you, I've just never seen that happen, not during a case.
[02:17:50.000 --> 02:17:55.000]  I should ask, what does success mean in this context?
[02:17:55.000 --> 02:18:03.000]  Well, he's talking about if you can get the judge to have a head cock moment and say, huh, maybe that's right.
[02:18:03.000 --> 02:18:06.000]  Maybe I have done everything all wrong.
[02:18:06.000 --> 02:18:11.000]  Well, I wasn't necessarily trying to put the judge on the spot.
[02:18:11.000 --> 02:18:18.000]  I'm trying to create a dynamic because the judge is a neutral party, luckily, in my case.
[02:18:18.000 --> 02:18:25.000]  And they're going to be making decisions about how a county is doing what they do.
[02:18:25.000 --> 02:18:30.000]  Now, of course, the county is going to come in and say, oh, everything we're doing is fine.
[02:18:30.000 --> 02:18:35.000]  And here's all our incredible excuses as to why.
[02:18:35.000 --> 02:18:40.000]  But unless they come up with something new that I've never seen and I've dug pretty deep,
[02:18:40.000 --> 02:18:46.000]  they're kind of dead to rights as to how they incorporated this new process that is not codified in anything.
[02:18:46.000 --> 02:18:50.000]  It's just made up. Yeah, but he has a bar card and he has a nice tie.
[02:18:50.000 --> 02:18:54.000]  What more do you want?
[02:18:54.000 --> 02:19:04.000]  I know. God, I hope I'm really sharp that day and I can come up with jokes like that that day.
[02:19:04.000 --> 02:19:15.000]  The judge needs to see as a neutral party and not from an antagonistic, you know, witness what's really going on.
[02:19:15.000 --> 02:19:27.000]  That's where I both want to put them on the spot, but also give them an opportunity to make comments that say, yeah, maybe we should look deeper at this.
[02:19:27.000 --> 02:19:34.000]  Because I don't know who's brought cases like this about counties making up processes that violates everybody's constitutional rights.
[02:19:34.000 --> 02:19:38.000]  I don't know what they've done with them in the past.
[02:19:38.000 --> 02:19:44.000]  I don't know if they sweep them on the rug, they buy people off or they just dismiss to cover it up.
[02:19:44.000 --> 02:19:52.000]  And, you know, I'm prepared for all that. I'm sure all three are a possibility.
[02:19:52.000 --> 02:20:01.000]  More likely, more likely people trying to cover it up because it's just it's too, you know, it's stirring the pot too much.
[02:20:02.000 --> 02:20:03.000]  Yeah.
[02:20:03.000 --> 02:20:07.000]  When you have the feds looking at the state, that's a different dynamic.
[02:20:07.000 --> 02:20:16.000]  So I don't know.
[02:20:16.000 --> 02:20:25.000]  Randy mentioned one time not backing them into a corner, giving them a way to rule in your favor without losing face.
[02:20:25.000 --> 02:20:31.000]  And in my suits, I have not succeeded in doing that.
[02:20:31.000 --> 02:20:36.000]  I haven't found a good way. I'm like, I'm calling them out for everything left and right.
[02:20:36.000 --> 02:20:40.000]  I'm saying this was completely wrong. The law says, A, you did B.
[02:20:40.000 --> 02:20:44.000]  The law says not to do C and you did.
[02:20:44.000 --> 02:20:47.000]  And I'm calling them out and there's like there's no escape.
[02:20:48.000 --> 02:21:02.000]  So then they end up ruling against me for some really bizarre, stupid thing like the attorney on the other side argues and makes up some facts with no personal knowledge.
[02:21:02.000 --> 02:21:11.000]  And then the judge considers that testimony that rules in their favor.
[02:21:11.000 --> 02:21:16.000]  It's completely messed up. So then that forces you to have to appeal.
[02:21:16.000 --> 02:21:37.000]  So if if you are able to follow Randy's suggestion and find a way to give them an out to rule like save face, then maybe you'll have some better success than I did in those cases.
[02:21:37.000 --> 02:21:48.000]  Even though safe face should have nothing to do with anything in the real world, it has a lot to do with everything.
[02:21:48.000 --> 02:21:52.000]  So I give them an opportunity to correct their mistakes.
[02:21:52.000 --> 02:22:11.000]  Yeah, or to or to come up with some fall guy to say, you know, maybe, well, if the officer had done such and such, then then they may have had some plausible deniability to, you know, in that way, whatever.
[02:22:11.000 --> 02:22:19.000]  Then they can point at somebody and say, yeah, it's true that he didn't provide the something something he didn't sign a complaint or he didn't whatever.
[02:22:19.000 --> 02:22:35.000]  And then they can rule in your favor for some reason that wasn't all about their due process, egregious due process violations.
[02:22:35.000 --> 02:22:47.000]  OK, yeah, always we have to consider that when we deal with the prosecutor, he doesn't want us stirring his milk.
[02:22:47.000 --> 02:22:55.000]  So he's going to resist everything we do just so he can keep control.
[02:22:55.000 --> 02:23:01.000]  So how do we craft what we're doing that binds him?
[02:23:01.000 --> 02:23:12.000]  So I was talking earlier about indictments and the prosecutor going to do what suits the prosecutor.
[02:23:12.000 --> 02:23:18.000]  And I want to do what suits me when I'm trying to invoke the duty of the grand jury.
[02:23:18.000 --> 02:23:35.000]  How do I craft my presentation so I take into account what the prosecutor wants to do and cover that before he gets a chance to get to it?
[02:23:35.000 --> 02:23:40.000]  Well, we're talking about a lot of complicated stuff tonight.
[02:23:40.000 --> 02:23:47.000]  It's kind of like playing chess.
[02:23:47.000 --> 02:23:56.000]  We've got a prosecutor here who is supposed to be we assume that he is there to properly adjudicate crime.
[02:23:56.000 --> 02:23:59.000]  And it would be nice if that was the case.
[02:23:59.000 --> 02:24:02.000]  But it's been my experience that that's not why he's there.
[02:24:02.000 --> 02:24:05.000]  No, he just wants to secure convictions.
[02:24:05.000 --> 02:24:11.000]  Check a box and keep that conviction ratio at a highest number possible.
[02:24:11.000 --> 02:24:16.000]  Yeah, I got five hundred cases on my desk.
[02:24:16.000 --> 02:24:20.000]  I want to get one off my desk.
[02:24:20.000 --> 02:24:26.000]  And that's part of when we're looking at a prosecutor, you want to figure out where he's at.
[02:24:26.000 --> 02:24:28.000]  You know, you want to say he's a good guy or a bad guy.
[02:24:28.000 --> 02:24:38.000]  But my county attorney, years ago when Greg Larry got elected as county attorney,
[02:24:38.000 --> 02:24:49.000]  I went to him and complained that all these truck drivers, these rock truck drivers were out here acting like crazy people.
[02:24:49.000 --> 02:24:56.000]  And if someone happened to give him a ticket, he wouldn't even go to court.
[02:24:56.000 --> 02:24:59.000]  He would just file a no, no contending appeal.
[02:24:59.000 --> 02:25:04.000]  And it would go to court, go to the appellate court or to the appellate court.
[02:25:04.000 --> 02:25:06.000]  In this case, it would be the county court.
[02:25:06.000 --> 02:25:09.000]  And the county court wasn't prosecuting them.
[02:25:09.000 --> 02:25:12.000]  So I went to him and said, what's going on here?
[02:25:12.000 --> 02:25:14.000]  These guys can violate all the traffic laws they want to.
[02:25:14.000 --> 02:25:18.000]  They can run them off in the ditch, chase them off the road, do all kind of crazy stuff.
[02:25:18.000 --> 02:25:20.000]  And nobody polices it.
[02:25:20.000 --> 02:25:25.000]  So they just go to the court and they plead no, no contending appeal.
[02:25:25.000 --> 02:25:28.000]  It goes to the county court and the county court never prosecutes.
[02:25:28.000 --> 02:25:31.000]  He said, yeah, that was an issue when I got into office.
[02:25:31.000 --> 02:25:41.000]  And I told the judge that we need to do something about all of these traffic law courts,
[02:25:41.000 --> 02:25:46.000]  these violations of traffic law that get appealed to the county court.
[02:25:46.000 --> 02:25:51.000]  We need to do something so that they don't just get away with it.
[02:25:51.000 --> 02:25:53.000]  And the judge said, no problem.
[02:25:53.000 --> 02:26:02.000]  And then he said in about an hour, the clerk came to his office with a stack of 3,000 cases,
[02:26:02.000 --> 02:26:08.000]  put them on his desk and said, here, have fun.
[02:26:08.000 --> 02:26:12.000]  So he's the county attorney.
[02:26:12.000 --> 02:26:17.000]  He's got all this county stuff, you know, class A misdemeanor stuff he's got to deal with.
[02:26:17.000 --> 02:26:23.000]  And now all of a sudden he's got 3,000 cases.
[02:26:23.000 --> 02:26:29.000]  He don't have the funds to adjudicate 3,000 cases.
[02:26:29.000 --> 02:26:33.000]  To prosecute or even to commence?
[02:26:33.000 --> 02:26:35.000]  To prosecute him.
[02:26:35.000 --> 02:26:44.000]  So, you know, we pick on the prosecutor, but he's got his own issues that he has to deal with.
[02:26:44.000 --> 02:26:45.000]  Hang on.
[02:26:45.000 --> 02:26:47.000]  We'll be right back.
[02:26:47.000 --> 02:26:49.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Woodlaver Radio.
[02:26:49.000 --> 02:26:54.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[02:26:54.000 --> 02:26:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[02:26:59.000 --> 02:27:02.000]  Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise,
[02:27:02.000 --> 02:27:07.000]  but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[02:27:07.000 --> 02:27:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment.
[02:27:13.000 --> 02:27:15.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[02:27:15.000 --> 02:27:18.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[02:27:18.000 --> 02:27:23.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:27:23.000 --> 02:27:28.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:27:28.000 --> 02:27:31.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:27:31.000 --> 02:27:35.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:27:35.000 --> 02:27:39.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:27:39.000 --> 02:27:42.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:27:42.000 --> 02:27:47.000]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[02:27:47.000 --> 02:27:53.000]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster
[02:27:53.000 --> 02:27:55.000]  live longer than expected.
[02:27:55.000 --> 02:27:59.000]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[02:27:59.000 --> 02:28:04.000]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy
[02:28:04.000 --> 02:28:06.000]  as more traditional statistical measures.
[02:28:06.000 --> 02:28:09.000]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[02:28:09.000 --> 02:28:12.000]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[02:28:12.000 --> 02:28:15.000]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes.
[02:28:15.000 --> 02:28:20.000]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[02:28:20.000 --> 02:28:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:28:39.000 --> 02:28:42.000]  A 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[02:28:42.000 --> 02:28:46.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[02:28:46.000 --> 02:28:50.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[02:28:50.000 --> 02:28:52.000]  and believe there is more to the story.
[02:28:52.000 --> 02:28:55.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[02:28:55.000 --> 02:28:57.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[02:28:57.000 --> 02:29:00.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[02:29:00.000 --> 02:29:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[02:29:06.000 --> 02:29:12.000]  Tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[02:29:12.000 --> 02:29:17.000]  where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[02:29:17.000 --> 02:29:22.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
[02:29:22.000 --> 02:29:24.000]  rightly dividing the word of truth.
[02:29:24.000 --> 02:29:28.000]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[02:29:28.000 --> 02:29:32.000]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[02:29:32.000 --> 02:29:37.000]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[02:29:37.000 --> 02:29:39.000]  and Christian character development.
[02:29:39.000 --> 02:29:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[02:29:44.000 --> 02:29:50.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[02:29:50.000 --> 02:29:56.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[02:29:56.000 --> 02:30:00.000]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[02:30:02.000 --> 02:30:06.000]  Free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[02:30:32.000 --> 02:30:37.000]  Yeah, I won't
[02:30:37.000 --> 02:30:41.000]  Oh, I won't
[02:30:41.000 --> 02:30:48.000]  I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes
[02:30:48.000 --> 02:30:56.000]  I simply must refuse your news, also come in lies
[02:30:56.000 --> 02:31:04.000]  It seems you like the fact, but please take some words to the wise
[02:31:04.000 --> 02:31:12.000]  Please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes
[02:31:26.000 --> 02:31:34.000]  I simply must refuse your news, also come in lies
[02:31:34.000 --> 02:31:42.000]  Please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes
[02:31:42.000 --> 02:31:50.000]  An orange is an orange and will never be an apple
[02:31:50.000 --> 02:31:57.000]  This image is an oaf, it is no tough concept to grapple
[02:31:57.000 --> 02:32:05.000]  It's just too much to bear, I won't wear your evil shackles
[02:32:05.000 --> 02:32:12.000]  Bluebird is a bluebird and will never be a grapple
[02:32:35.000 --> 02:32:40.000]  And I still wonder to this day about the reasons for the dismissal
[02:32:40.000 --> 02:32:48.000]  You know, I know what the DA told me, oh, I'm just going to dismiss this because I don't want to deal with
[02:32:48.000 --> 02:32:52.000]  This is, this is, you're not a criminal. I want to go after the real criminals
[02:32:52.000 --> 02:32:57.000]  And if you want to try to argue the things that you're talking about
[02:32:57.000 --> 02:33:04.000]  I mean, full power to you, go fight it, but I don't want to come against you
[02:33:04.000 --> 02:33:09.000]  I want to come against real criminals. And I still wonder to this day
[02:33:09.000 --> 02:33:21.000]  Was it really for that reason? Or was it maybe, or maybe they saw a tornado coming at them and didn't want to have to hassle with
[02:33:21.000 --> 02:33:26.000]  This is going to be sitting on my desk and causing me trouble
[02:33:26.000 --> 02:33:37.000]  And I'm going to have my superiors, you know, calling me on the carpet for all these violations of law that this guy has put in his documents
[02:33:37.000 --> 02:33:43.000]  Oh my gosh, I don't want to, this is going to be big and ugly. It's going to not go over quickly
[02:33:43.000 --> 02:33:49.000]  What we were talking about was not whether the prosecutor is a good guy or a bad guy
[02:33:50.000 --> 02:33:55.000]  Whether or not he wants to get us convicted or wants to railroad us
[02:33:55.000 --> 02:34:03.000]  I don't think that's it. We allot the prosecutor a budget
[02:34:03.000 --> 02:34:11.000]  And we give him these assistant prosecutors that cost him 50, 75 bucks an hour
[02:34:11.000 --> 02:34:17.000]  And how does he best allocate the budget that he has?
[02:34:17.000 --> 02:34:28.000]  So the county court, they come up with all these appeals from the traffic court to the county
[02:34:28.000 --> 02:34:36.000]  And he's trying to, county court's trying to adjudicate class A and class B misdemeanors
[02:34:36.000 --> 02:34:45.000]  And he gives a stack of traffic cases that have been appealed and he don't want to mess with it
[02:34:45.000 --> 02:34:54.000]  He's struggling to adjust his budget so he can pay all these people and adjudicate the more serious issues that are in front of him
[02:34:54.000 --> 02:35:00.000]  And then now you come along and you want him to address traffic tickets
[02:35:00.000 --> 02:35:05.000]  And he's thinking, man, I don't have time for this. I don't have the money for this
[02:35:05.000 --> 02:35:15.000]  So we want to condemn the prosecutor when he has issues that we don't necessarily think about
[02:35:15.000 --> 02:35:22.000]  And if we're going to win our case, we have to keep in mind where the prosecutor is
[02:35:22.000 --> 02:35:27.000]  We can go to the prosecutor and say, look guys, make me a deal here
[02:35:27.000 --> 02:35:32.000]  Make all this go away and I won't fight you if you don't make it go away
[02:35:32.000 --> 02:35:36.000]  So I'm going to drag you into the court and we're going to have stacks and stacks of hearings
[02:35:36.000 --> 02:35:41.000]  And every time one of your lawyers appears, I'm going to bargain the snot out of him
[02:35:41.000 --> 02:35:45.000]  And I'm going to cost you a lot of money
[02:35:45.000 --> 02:35:51.000]  And realizing that I don't want to prosecute traffic tickets
[02:35:51.000 --> 02:35:57.000]  I got a guy here with the 10 kilos of dope, that's the guy I want to go after
[02:35:57.000 --> 02:36:03.000]  And you're asking me to spend all my time on minor peddling BS
[02:36:03.000 --> 02:36:09.000]  So I guess this kind of goes to judge not that you be not judged
[02:36:09.000 --> 02:36:13.000]  We always want to blame the prosecutor for all the bad things
[02:36:13.000 --> 02:36:19.000]  But we tend not to consider the house that he lives in
[02:36:19.000 --> 02:36:22.000]  What do you think, Chris?
[02:36:22.000 --> 02:36:25.000]  Well, I'm considering it. That's why I'm talking the way I'm talking about it
[02:36:25.000 --> 02:36:31.000]  I understand they created these processes probably to try to cure exactly what you just said, Randy
[02:36:31.000 --> 02:36:35.000]  They're overloaded, they don't know how to deal with this volume of stuff
[02:36:35.000 --> 02:36:40.000]  The Constitution allows us all these protections even down to a misdemeanor
[02:36:40.000 --> 02:36:46.000]  And they're like, well, we don't have the resources to protect your constitutional rights for the volume of stuff
[02:36:46.000 --> 02:36:49.000]  So we got to come up with some clever ways
[02:36:49.000 --> 02:36:52.000]  My issue was that the way they came up with, it wasn't very clever
[02:36:52.000 --> 02:37:02.000]  And we're coming into awareness of this now because we're supposed to trust them and respect them
[02:37:02.000 --> 02:37:08.000]  Well, look, if you're that smart to be in your position, you got to come up with a way that it works
[02:37:08.000 --> 02:37:11.000]  Or go to Congress and get some help
[02:37:11.000 --> 02:37:15.000]  Trying to trick us is not going to work anymore
[02:37:15.000 --> 02:37:20.000]  We're waking up, like Brett was saying earlier, we're figuring this stuff out and there's a lot of us coming
[02:37:20.000 --> 02:37:25.000]  What are they going to do?
[02:37:25.000 --> 02:37:33.000]  There aren't enough of us out there to address these issues because lawyers don't want to do it
[02:37:33.000 --> 02:37:39.000]  A lawyer doesn't want to address an appeal on a traffic case
[02:37:39.000 --> 02:37:45.000]  How does he charge 50 bucks an hour for a traffic case?
[02:37:45.000 --> 02:37:51.000]  In five minutes, he's exceeded the amount of the fine in the traffic case
[02:37:51.000 --> 02:37:55.000]  So there's logistical problems here
[02:37:55.000 --> 02:37:58.000]  And my concern, I don't really care so much about traffic
[02:37:58.000 --> 02:38:14.000]  I care about the courts making these concessions in order to adjudicate, to handle their docket
[02:38:14.000 --> 02:38:18.000]  But Randy, they had a really good reason to violate your rights
[02:38:18.000 --> 02:38:20.000]  Yeah, they do
[02:38:20.000 --> 02:38:23.000]  And it's a good valid reason
[02:38:23.000 --> 02:38:29.000]  They could probably explain it if you asked them to
[02:38:29.000 --> 02:38:34.000]  Yeah, I'm the prosecutor, what the heck you want me to do?
[02:38:34.000 --> 02:38:41.000]  I got 500 Class A and B misdemeanors that I got to prosecute
[02:38:41.000 --> 02:38:47.000]  And now somebody comes along with 2,000 traffic tickets, I have to prosecute
[02:38:47.000 --> 02:38:51.000]  Well, I'll tell you what, I've got some good news for you, Mr.
[02:38:51.000 --> 02:38:55.000]  You thought you were the prosecutor and you thought some cases existed
[02:38:55.000 --> 02:39:01.000]  Guess what? Those cases don't exist
[02:39:01.000 --> 02:39:11.000]  You're being given numbers and folders by an efficient court clerk who assumed that a case exists
[02:39:11.000 --> 02:39:16.000]  But hey, nothing ever commenced
[02:39:16.000 --> 02:39:19.000]  So there's nothing for you to deal with, good news
[02:39:19.000 --> 02:39:21.000]  You can throw those 2,000 away
[02:39:21.000 --> 02:39:28.000]  Just move the court to dismiss for lack of prosecution
[02:39:28.000 --> 02:39:32.000]  That's what I'm talking about here
[02:39:32.000 --> 02:39:39.000]  Okay, I'm not a Christian, but I'm uncomfortable about passing judgment
[02:39:39.000 --> 02:39:43.000]  So we've got these prosecutors that I want to assume that they're good guys
[02:39:43.000 --> 02:39:49.000]  And they're doing the best they can within the circumstances that they have to deal with
[02:39:49.000 --> 02:40:02.000]  So how do we move into that without passing judgment and give the prosecutor a way to give us the ruling that we want?
[02:40:02.000 --> 02:40:07.000]  Prosecutor can't give us the ruling, that's another thing
[02:40:07.000 --> 02:40:10.000]  He can choose to dismiss it
[02:40:11.000 --> 02:40:13.000]  He can make a motion to dismiss
[02:40:13.000 --> 02:40:18.000]  And that's what they tend to do, it'll be to dismiss in the interest of justice
[02:40:18.000 --> 02:40:20.000]  They won't tell you why
[02:40:20.000 --> 02:40:22.000]  Man, you sure did beat me up good
[02:40:22.000 --> 02:40:27.000]  They won't say anything, but it'll dismiss in the interest of justice
[02:40:27.000 --> 02:40:36.000]  But if I black the prosecutor's eye too much, he's not going to want to admit that he was screwing things up, so it makes it harder
[02:40:36.000 --> 02:40:39.000]  Yeah, exactly
[02:40:39.000 --> 02:40:45.000]  We need to be careful in how we act so that the prosecutor can give us what we want
[02:40:45.000 --> 02:40:49.000]  And this sounds biblical to me
[02:40:49.000 --> 02:40:57.000]  Rank Elton Depp, Fountainwood Blood Radio, we'll be right back on the other side
[02:40:59.000 --> 02:41:02.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[02:41:02.000 --> 02:41:06.000]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[02:41:06.000 --> 02:41:10.000]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[02:41:10.000 --> 02:41:17.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[02:41:17.000 --> 02:41:23.000]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[02:41:23.000 --> 02:41:32.000]  That provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero co-pay
[02:41:32.000 --> 02:41:38.000]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[02:41:38.000 --> 02:41:44.000]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[02:41:44.000 --> 02:41:51.000]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit
[02:41:51.000 --> 02:41:59.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[02:42:00.000 --> 02:42:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[02:42:03.000 --> 02:42:06.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[02:42:06.000 --> 02:42:14.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[02:42:14.000 --> 02:42:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[02:42:18.000 --> 02:42:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[02:42:22.000 --> 02:42:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[02:42:27.000 --> 02:42:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[02:42:33.000 --> 02:42:42.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[02:42:42.000 --> 02:42:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[02:42:51.000 --> 02:43:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[02:43:21.000 --> 02:43:26.000]  Thank you for watching!
[02:43:51.000 --> 02:43:57.000]  I vote for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance
[02:43:57.000 --> 02:44:02.000]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting
[02:44:02.000 --> 02:44:06.000]  I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons
[02:44:06.000 --> 02:44:12.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Felton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We're talking to Chris in Colorado
[02:44:12.000 --> 02:44:18.000]  And Chris, I've kind of been focused on a conundrum
[02:44:18.000 --> 02:44:25.000]  And I do this show because it gives me great value
[02:44:25.000 --> 02:44:33.000]  It gives me the opportunity to examine complicated issues
[02:44:33.000 --> 02:44:38.000]  That I wouldn't, I can't do this in my own head
[02:44:38.000 --> 02:44:43.000]  Effectively, I need somebody else to give me some input
[02:44:43.000 --> 02:44:51.000]  And I was so focused on what I was doing, I have no idea what your issue is
[02:44:51.000 --> 02:44:56.000]  We just gotta use you as cannon powder
[02:44:56.000 --> 02:45:00.000]  Okay, what is your question?
[02:45:00.000 --> 02:45:04.000]  Well, it's probably for another night, because I gotta go to bed soon, in all honesty
[02:45:04.000 --> 02:45:09.000]  But I'm starting to see some of the bigger pictures here
[02:45:09.000 --> 02:45:18.000]  And I would like to speak to everybody at once and help them understand what locally they should know
[02:45:18.000 --> 02:45:23.000]  It's kind of like teaching somebody to a kid when he's 12 to go to the bank and get his first bank account
[02:45:23.000 --> 02:45:26.000]  You know, what do you need to know?
[02:45:26.000 --> 02:45:31.000]  And I think some of the most pressing issues are
[02:45:31.000 --> 02:45:35.000]  Well, when we drive down the road, we always gotta be worried about crossing the yellow line
[02:45:36.000 --> 02:45:39.000]  And a cop pulling us over, and what's gonna happen after I get that ticket?
[02:45:39.000 --> 02:45:43.000]  What's gonna happen if I get arrested for something I probably didn't do?
[02:45:43.000 --> 02:45:47.000]  There's all these many, many things the DA doesn't want to deal with
[02:45:47.000 --> 02:45:50.000]  Well, that's what the cops are bringing them, a bunch of petty crap
[02:45:50.000 --> 02:45:55.000]  Well, I think it's a good practice, like you've always encouraged
[02:45:55.000 --> 02:45:58.000]  Go out and get yourself a ticket and then learn the system
[02:45:58.000 --> 02:46:04.000]  Well, I'm trying to understand the very, very specifics of what's supposed to happen
[02:46:04.000 --> 02:46:08.000]  You get that ticket, what happens next behind the scenes?
[02:46:08.000 --> 02:46:10.000]  And what are you supposed to know?
[02:46:10.000 --> 02:46:15.000]  And according to, I think, all of our rights, it starts with, okay, you get a summons
[02:46:15.000 --> 02:46:20.000]  And we should know the various forms of the summons and complaints and how it happens
[02:46:20.000 --> 02:46:22.000]  And then secondly, what happens in a probable cause hearing?
[02:46:22.000 --> 02:46:25.000]  Are we allowed to be there? Does it happen with a judge?
[02:46:25.000 --> 02:46:27.000]  It's all these things that people should know
[02:46:27.000 --> 02:46:32.000]  And then when they actually get down with the DA or the first appearance or the arraignment
[02:46:32.000 --> 02:46:35.000]  They know exactly what should have happened and what didn't happen
[02:46:35.000 --> 02:46:38.000]  And it's a simple thing to know, like that's just local stuff
[02:46:38.000 --> 02:46:43.000]  Yeah, well, it's state-specific, yeah
[02:46:43.000 --> 02:46:47.000]  To some degree, it's state-specific
[02:46:47.000 --> 02:46:55.000]  All of this is pretty well, generically, the same across all the states
[02:46:56.000 --> 02:47:03.000]  But that doesn't go to how things actually work in the real world
[02:47:03.000 --> 02:47:06.000]  And that's what we were talking about earlier today
[02:47:06.000 --> 02:47:10.000]  You're talking about, Chris, what are the steps?
[02:47:10.000 --> 02:47:13.000]  And we talk about this all the time
[02:47:13.000 --> 02:47:18.000]  Police invites you, a traffic citation
[02:47:18.000 --> 02:47:21.000]  He gives you an opportunity to sign the ticket
[02:47:21.000 --> 02:47:23.000]  And that's not an admission of guilt
[02:47:23.000 --> 02:47:24.000]  That's just a promise to appear
[02:47:24.000 --> 02:47:27.000]  And then he's to give the complaint to some magistrate
[02:47:27.000 --> 02:47:31.000]  And you agree to appear before a magistrate, not a judge
[02:47:31.000 --> 02:47:37.000]  And we're alleging that the magistrate has to make a determination of probable cause
[02:47:37.000 --> 02:47:39.000]  Which they don't
[02:47:39.000 --> 02:47:46.000]  This magistrate's sitting here and he's got 500 tickets in front of him
[02:47:46.000 --> 02:47:50.000]  He don't have time to do 500 examining
[02:47:50.000 --> 02:47:56.000]  He summons people in for, and the policeman and the individual
[02:47:56.000 --> 02:47:58.000]  And anything else that might be there
[02:47:58.000 --> 02:48:01.000]  And have this long, exhaustive examining trial
[02:48:01.000 --> 02:48:05.000]  Man, they don't have time for that
[02:48:05.000 --> 02:48:07.000]  My problem
[02:48:07.000 --> 02:48:11.000]  Yeah, so in the real world
[02:48:11.000 --> 02:48:16.000]  Where there are no bad guys here and everybody's dancing around
[02:48:16.000 --> 02:48:25.000]  Trying to handle all these issues most effectively within their current budget
[02:48:25.000 --> 02:48:31.000]  And if you start accusing the prosecutors of being bad guys
[02:48:31.000 --> 02:48:33.000]  That's not helpful
[02:48:33.000 --> 02:48:36.000]  They got all on their plate that they can get to
[02:48:36.000 --> 02:48:40.000]  There are a few guys out there who are bad guys, but they're rare
[02:48:40.000 --> 02:48:44.000]  So how do we approach these things, Chris
[02:48:45.000 --> 02:48:47.000]  So that when we go to the court
[02:48:47.000 --> 02:48:52.000]  We give the court some dignity
[02:48:52.000 --> 02:48:59.000]  And give them room to give us the decision that we want
[02:48:59.000 --> 02:49:03.000]  And get our case off their docket
[02:49:03.000 --> 02:49:08.000]  Without them losing face or putting themselves in a position
[02:49:08.000 --> 02:49:12.000]  To where they will be accused of favoritism
[02:49:13.000 --> 02:49:16.000]  How can the court clear their docket
[02:49:16.000 --> 02:49:19.000]  And what can we do to help them and give us our
[02:49:19.000 --> 02:49:22.000]  Part of the question I'm asking is
[02:49:22.000 --> 02:49:26.000]  We were talking about ways to not box them into a corner
[02:49:26.000 --> 02:49:28.000]  When they're breaking their own laws
[02:49:28.000 --> 02:49:32.000]  And they're sidestepping and just trying to be efficient
[02:49:32.000 --> 02:49:34.000]  You know, air quotes
[02:49:34.000 --> 02:49:39.000]  They are deciding to step outside the boundaries of what they agreed to do
[02:49:40.000 --> 02:49:42.000]  Yeah, exactly
[02:49:42.000 --> 02:49:46.000]  What they want to be efficient about is violating our rights
[02:49:46.000 --> 02:49:48.000]  Above all
[02:49:48.000 --> 02:49:51.000]  We're having this discussion right now
[02:49:51.000 --> 02:49:53.000]  What other ideas can we give them
[02:49:53.000 --> 02:49:56.000]  Because they have to come up with an idea that abides by our rights
[02:49:56.000 --> 02:50:00.000]  Otherwise we're going to have this continual disconnect
[02:50:00.000 --> 02:50:04.000]  So another option is
[02:50:04.000 --> 02:50:07.000]  You guys came up with a crappy idea
[02:50:07.000 --> 02:50:09.000]  Other ideas
[02:50:09.000 --> 02:50:11.000]  And again this is above my pay grade
[02:50:11.000 --> 02:50:15.000]  But here's some better ideas that are within the construct of our rights
[02:50:15.000 --> 02:50:17.000]  And upholding our rights
[02:50:17.000 --> 02:50:20.000]  Can we do this efficiently
[02:50:20.000 --> 02:50:23.000]  And I don't have an answer to that yet
[02:50:23.000 --> 02:50:29.000]  Do you have some examples of crappy ideas that you could put in front of the court
[02:50:29.000 --> 02:50:34.000]  Okay, I do
[02:50:34.000 --> 02:50:36.000]  I have a whole bunch of them
[02:50:36.000 --> 02:50:41.000]  You ask the court to do something they're not going to want to do
[02:50:41.000 --> 02:50:49.000]  And make it appear to the judge that you're going to bog him down
[02:50:49.000 --> 02:50:52.000]  That, you know, these municipal courts
[02:50:52.000 --> 02:50:55.000]  Most of the judges are lawyers in their day job
[02:50:55.000 --> 02:50:58.000]  So they get off the day job and they come to this court
[02:50:58.000 --> 02:51:02.000]  And you got this guy just busting their chops
[02:51:02.000 --> 02:51:04.000]  South Lake, Texas
[02:51:04.000 --> 02:51:11.000]  A friend of mine's, one of his drivers got a ticket
[02:51:11.000 --> 02:51:14.000]  And I went down with him
[02:51:14.000 --> 02:51:18.000]  And I just walked through due process
[02:51:18.000 --> 02:51:20.000]  And they wound up dismissing the whole thing
[02:51:20.000 --> 02:51:26.000]  Because they got 50 some odd people in there illegally
[02:51:26.000 --> 02:51:29.000]  That were summoned to be in court
[02:51:29.000 --> 02:51:31.000]  And there was no judge present
[02:51:31.000 --> 02:51:36.000]  This whole thing was a horrific scam
[02:51:36.000 --> 02:51:39.000]  But they're struggling
[02:51:39.000 --> 02:51:47.000]  They got in one night, they got 58 cases on their docket
[02:51:47.000 --> 02:51:52.000]  How are they going to adjudicate 58 cases?
[02:51:52.000 --> 02:51:57.000]  So every level of prosecution is the same way
[02:51:57.000 --> 02:51:59.000]  So we can go in there and criticize them
[02:51:59.000 --> 02:52:03.000]  And tell everybody what a bunch of no good rotten criminals they are
[02:52:03.000 --> 02:52:07.000]  But that won't necessarily get us to our outcome
[02:52:07.000 --> 02:52:11.000]  What if we could empathize with the prosecutors
[02:52:11.000 --> 02:52:18.000]  And say, look guys, I know you got more cases than you can keep up with
[02:52:18.000 --> 02:52:21.000]  And how do we give them a reason to make your case go away
[02:52:21.000 --> 02:52:26.000]  Without them losing face?
[02:52:26.000 --> 02:52:27.000]  Well I used the Brett method
[02:52:27.000 --> 02:52:29.000]  I went in there like a tiger and ripped their head off
[02:52:29.000 --> 02:52:33.000]  I was not going to let them prosecute my case
[02:52:33.000 --> 02:52:38.000]  But I'm one of a thousand that would do something like that
[02:52:38.000 --> 02:52:42.000]  Yes you are, and you are unique in that regard
[02:52:42.000 --> 02:52:45.000]  And what I'm wanting to say is
[02:52:45.000 --> 02:52:48.000]  If we are creative and we think about this
[02:52:48.000 --> 02:52:53.000]  We may be able to find a way to get this done
[02:52:53.000 --> 02:53:02.000]  Without you having to spend six months to a year researching and writing documents to get this to go away
[02:53:02.000 --> 02:53:08.000]  How do we give that prosecutor who's got this big stack of cases on his desk
[02:53:08.000 --> 02:53:11.000]  That he's got to get cleared out
[02:53:11.000 --> 02:53:18.000]  How do we give him impetus or a reason to pull yours out and make it go away?
[02:53:18.000 --> 02:53:22.000]  Well I'm coming in the other direction now
[02:53:22.000 --> 02:53:26.000]  I'm trying to address the overall problem systemically
[02:53:26.000 --> 02:53:28.000]  That's where I'm coming from Randy
[02:53:28.000 --> 02:53:30.000]  I'm no longer worried about defending myself
[02:53:30.000 --> 02:53:33.000]  I'm worried about everybody else defending themselves
[02:53:33.000 --> 02:53:44.000]  I'm wondering how we get the system to actually do good by the people
[02:53:44.000 --> 02:53:46.000]  I know this is a lofty phrase
[02:53:46.000 --> 02:53:50.000]  But they made me go away because I was one of their headaches
[02:53:50.000 --> 02:53:55.000]  But they're still doing the exact same thing to a thousand people every month at least
[02:53:55.000 --> 02:54:00.000]  And most of those people have no idea what's being done to them
[02:54:01.000 --> 02:54:03.000]  Exactly
[02:54:03.000 --> 02:54:08.000]  And they're not going to understand what's being done to them until somebody brings it out
[02:54:08.000 --> 02:54:12.000]  So that may answer my question
[02:54:12.000 --> 02:54:15.000]  You got this prosecutor here who's harried
[02:54:15.000 --> 02:54:22.000]  He don't get enough money and he's got six thousand cases on his desk
[02:54:22.000 --> 02:54:24.000]  So you come in
[02:54:24.000 --> 02:54:27.000]  What if you were to do some public records request
[02:54:27.000 --> 02:54:32.000]  And then you had a postcard that went out to all six thousand of those people to tell them
[02:54:32.000 --> 02:54:36.000]  How due process has been violated in their case
[02:54:42.000 --> 02:54:45.000]  That's actually, that would be fun
[02:54:48.000 --> 02:54:52.000]  I have, I was looking through some records today
[02:54:52.000 --> 02:55:03.000]  And I came up with a CD in a package from the Victoria County Sheriff's Department
[02:55:03.000 --> 02:55:14.000]  It was about two hundred criminal complaints against people who were arrested and taken directly to jail
[02:55:15.000 --> 02:55:21.000]  I made them give me this so I could sue them for every one of those
[02:55:22.000 --> 02:55:25.000]  These guys are in a spot
[02:55:25.000 --> 02:55:32.000]  So how do we squeeze that spot and help them find a remedy to their problem
[02:55:36.000 --> 02:55:41.000]  We're complaining, anyway, hang on, we'll be right back
[02:55:41.000 --> 02:55:44.000]  And Sam, don't go away, we will get to you
[02:55:45.000 --> 02:55:50.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[02:55:50.000 --> 02:55:57.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help
[02:55:57.000 --> 02:56:02.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today
[02:56:02.000 --> 02:56:09.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life
[02:56:09.000 --> 02:56:14.000]  The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[02:56:14.000 --> 02:56:20.000]  Chapter by chapter Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation
[02:56:20.000 --> 02:56:24.000]  Growing in Christ and how to build up the church
[02:56:24.000 --> 02:56:30.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[02:56:31.000 --> 02:56:39.000]  Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102
[02:56:39.000 --> 02:56:43.000]  That's 888-551-0102
[02:56:43.000 --> 02:56:48.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[02:56:50.000 --> 02:56:57.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com
[02:57:01.000 --> 02:57:05.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[02:57:05.000 --> 02:57:08.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[02:57:08.000 --> 02:57:10.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[02:57:10.000 --> 02:57:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[02:57:16.000 --> 02:57:18.000]  Privacy is under attack
[02:57:18.000 --> 02:57:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[02:57:22.000 --> 02:57:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[02:57:26.000 --> 02:57:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[02:57:31.000 --> 02:57:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[02:57:34.000 --> 02:57:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[02:57:37.000 --> 02:57:41.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[02:57:41.000 --> 02:57:44.000]  Start over with Startpage
[02:57:44.000 --> 02:57:47.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed
[02:57:47.000 --> 02:57:50.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there
[02:57:50.000 --> 02:57:53.000]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight
[02:57:54.000 --> 02:57:59.000]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent
[02:57:59.000 --> 02:58:05.000]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers
[02:58:05.000 --> 02:58:08.000]  Third party? Third Amendment? Get it?
[02:58:08.000 --> 02:58:12.000]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging
[02:58:12.000 --> 02:58:16.000]  Tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment
[02:58:16.000 --> 02:58:20.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[02:58:23.000 --> 02:58:28.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[02:58:28.000 --> 02:58:32.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[02:58:32.000 --> 02:58:34.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[02:58:34.000 --> 02:58:40.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[02:58:40.000 --> 02:58:42.000]  Privacy is under attack
[02:58:42.000 --> 02:58:46.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[02:58:46.000 --> 02:58:50.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll never get it back again
[02:58:51.000 --> 02:58:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[02:58:56.000 --> 02:59:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[02:59:01.000 --> 02:59:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[02:59:04.000 --> 02:59:07.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[02:59:07.000 --> 02:59:11.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[02:59:11.000 --> 02:59:15.000]  Start over with StartPage
[02:59:15.000 --> 02:59:18.000]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars
[02:59:18.000 --> 02:59:21.000]  A magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles
[02:59:21.000 --> 02:59:27.000]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure
[02:59:27.000 --> 02:59:30.000]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[02:59:30.000 --> 02:59:34.000]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security
[02:59:34.000 --> 02:59:39.000]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing
[02:59:39.000 --> 02:59:43.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause
[02:59:43.000 --> 02:59:46.000]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells
[02:59:46.000 --> 02:59:49.000]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[02:59:49.000 --> 02:59:52.000]  And use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth
[02:59:52.000 --> 02:59:57.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[03:00:17.000 --> 03:00:20.000]  Good morning, good morning, good morning, good morning
[03:00:20.000 --> 03:00:21.000]  Is it?
[03:00:21.000 --> 03:00:25.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:25.000 --> 03:00:28.000]  Until he returns
[03:00:28.000 --> 03:00:32.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:32.000 --> 03:00:36.000]  He has me with his strength and wisdom
[03:00:36.000 --> 03:00:43.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:43.000 --> 03:00:47.000]  Yeah, I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:48.000 --> 03:00:50.000]  Until I see his face
[03:00:50.000 --> 03:00:54.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:54.000 --> 03:00:58.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:00:59.000 --> 03:01:02.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:01:02.000 --> 03:01:05.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:01:06.000 --> 03:01:08.000]  I will hide by my father's house
[03:01:08.000 --> 03:01:14.280]  And Sam, I'm going to get to you in just a second.
[03:01:14.280 --> 03:01:21.860]  We want to address our cases, and we want people to win their cases.
[03:01:21.860 --> 03:01:29.920]  So how do we manipulate the prosecutor and the court into giving us the outcome that
[03:01:29.920 --> 03:01:32.640]  we want?
[03:01:32.640 --> 03:01:40.640]  How do we keep them from constricting their anal sphincter muscle and say, if I got this
[03:01:40.640 --> 03:01:46.620]  guy from Slack for this, we'll have everybody doing it.
[03:01:46.620 --> 03:01:53.440]  So if I prosecute him like crazy, it's going to cost me more to prosecute him than I'm
[03:01:53.440 --> 03:01:56.560]  going to derive from the court in the prosecution.
[03:01:56.560 --> 03:01:58.360]  So my budget goes down.
[03:01:58.360 --> 03:02:00.920]  What the heck do I do here?
[03:02:00.920 --> 03:02:10.720]  How do I manage all of these issues so that everybody can win?
[03:02:10.720 --> 03:02:19.320]  Why can't a prosecutor have the same, I guess, mechanism as judges?
[03:02:19.320 --> 03:02:22.280]  Judges get paid regardless.
[03:02:22.280 --> 03:02:26.480]  Why can't a prosecutor get paid regardless, and then he actually does his job?
[03:02:26.480 --> 03:02:30.480]  Why does the budget have to be the deciding factor?
[03:02:30.480 --> 03:02:34.520]  Why can't his oath and his actual position be the deciding factor?
[03:02:34.520 --> 03:02:39.800]  The budget is always the deciding factor.
[03:02:39.800 --> 03:02:47.200]  He does not have the funds to chase all of these minor issues when he has higher level
[03:02:47.200 --> 03:02:49.320]  issues to deal with.
[03:02:49.320 --> 03:02:51.360]  That's how it's always been.
[03:02:51.360 --> 03:02:54.320]  We ain't going to be able to fix that.
[03:02:54.320 --> 03:03:00.280]  So why not drop the minor issues instead of automating them and bulldozing people's rights?
[03:03:00.880 --> 03:03:07.280]  Speeding tickets for five and ten miles an hour, you know what I mean?
[03:03:07.280 --> 03:03:11.440]  We're trying to treat them with respect, and yet they're creating systems that are completely
[03:03:11.440 --> 03:03:15.760]  disregarding everybody else, and they don't have to be held accountable for it.
[03:03:15.760 --> 03:03:22.280]  I understand they have a tough job, but that's their job.
[03:03:22.280 --> 03:03:28.200]  I kind of lost respect for the system a few years ago, and I'm still trying to hold myself
[03:03:28.200 --> 03:03:31.960]  back from becoming a kind of a nutcase.
[03:03:31.960 --> 03:03:37.040]  But I still speak professionally, and I still go in there professionally, but I want results.
[03:03:37.040 --> 03:03:43.160]  And so to answer your question, I'm trying to play it off a little bit.
[03:03:43.160 --> 03:03:45.600]  How about a thought experiment?
[03:03:45.600 --> 03:03:48.880]  I'm 32.
[03:03:48.880 --> 03:03:53.680]  I just got arrested for some really obnoxious BS.
[03:03:53.680 --> 03:03:57.320]  Yeah, yeah, yeah, I was guilty.
[03:03:57.320 --> 03:04:01.920]  I didn't completely stop at that stop sign, and I rolled right through it.
[03:04:01.920 --> 03:04:06.160]  Yeah, yeah, yeah, but I didn't put anybody at any risk.
[03:04:06.160 --> 03:04:07.800]  I didn't cause any problem.
[03:04:07.800 --> 03:04:12.840]  And now you're doing all these gyrations and spending all the state money to prosecute
[03:04:12.840 --> 03:04:16.280]  me for chump change.
[03:04:16.280 --> 03:04:25.600]  How do you effectively convey that back and give them a reason to make this go away?
[03:04:25.600 --> 03:04:32.720]  A lot of people are not calling into our show to figure out how to fix the legal system.
[03:04:32.720 --> 03:04:42.920]  They're calling into our show to figure out how to find legal remedy.
[03:04:42.920 --> 03:04:44.800]  So how do we make those distinctions?
[03:04:44.800 --> 03:04:53.440]  Yeah, we know the courts are corrupt, we've got all that, but I'm not a Christian, so
[03:04:53.440 --> 03:04:58.280]  I don't believe in good and evil.
[03:04:58.280 --> 03:05:02.080]  It's not in my model.
[03:05:02.080 --> 03:05:06.240]  I can't find a place for it in my model.
[03:05:06.240 --> 03:05:12.000]  In my model, if I look at a public official and I feel like he's acting inappropriately,
[03:05:12.000 --> 03:05:19.360]  you know, that guy could have AIDS and it could be rotting out his brain.
[03:05:19.360 --> 03:05:22.040]  And he's driving a delivery truck for me.
[03:05:22.040 --> 03:05:24.880]  He's creating a hazard.
[03:05:24.880 --> 03:05:30.720]  How do I get rid of him and not wind up in suit for the next six months?
[03:05:30.720 --> 03:05:35.320]  I got an employee here who's stealing from me.
[03:05:35.320 --> 03:05:42.560]  How do I handle this so that I get adequate outcome when the prosecution is not going
[03:05:42.560 --> 03:05:44.600]  to want to put this guy in jail?
[03:05:44.600 --> 03:05:49.240]  The county is not going to want to pay 60 bucks a day for him in jail.
[03:05:50.240 --> 03:05:53.920]  We need to be thoughtful and creative.
[03:05:53.920 --> 03:05:58.280]  Chris, how do we petition this guy?
[03:05:58.280 --> 03:06:06.600]  Is there clear water on the property that you could direct him to or force him to?
[03:06:06.600 --> 03:06:07.600]  I don't know yet.
[03:06:07.600 --> 03:06:14.360]  I mean, my only idea, Randy, is to be as sinister as them until I can learn how not to be them,
[03:06:14.360 --> 03:06:17.440]  unfortunately, to answer your question.
[03:06:17.440 --> 03:06:28.560]  I had a female person that was fighting an issue and what I asked her to do, she wanted
[03:06:28.560 --> 03:06:32.240]  to smack me.
[03:06:32.240 --> 03:06:41.760]  But if we're going to get this fixed, we have to start addressing what is really in front
[03:06:41.760 --> 03:06:46.840]  of us instead of what we want to be in front of us.
[03:06:47.240 --> 03:06:55.040]  During the show, sometimes that's kind of hard because people have been directed to
[03:06:55.040 --> 03:06:57.800]  do things that cause them horrible problems.
[03:06:57.800 --> 03:07:04.120]  And when Brederick comes along and says, here's the law, here's the procedure, we have to
[03:07:04.120 --> 03:07:07.120]  struggle.
[03:07:07.120 --> 03:07:10.240]  How do we create a mindset?
[03:07:10.640 --> 03:07:21.320]  Chris, when you're dealing with these guys, how can you craft a mindset that has no regard
[03:07:21.320 --> 03:07:27.200]  to the right of things at the rule of law, but has regard to how do I get that other
[03:07:27.200 --> 03:07:33.160]  party to give me the outcome that I want?
[03:07:33.160 --> 03:07:39.640]  Do you do that?
[03:07:40.040 --> 03:07:48.440]  Yeah, most of the stuff we do, they say, oh, well, my gosh, the law says this and the law
[03:07:48.440 --> 03:07:50.840]  says that and they're supposed to do this and they're supposed to do that.
[03:07:50.840 --> 03:07:53.920]  Well, they never do that.
[03:07:53.920 --> 03:07:59.920]  So where do we find a different calculus?
[03:07:59.920 --> 03:08:07.520]  Instead of trying to get public officials to follow the law to the letter, how do we
[03:08:07.600 --> 03:08:19.480]  put public officials in a place to where they can expedite remedy without regard, not necessarily
[03:08:19.480 --> 03:08:23.640]  with regard to all these lofty, high-minded ideas?
[03:08:23.640 --> 03:08:29.680]  How do we actually find remedy?
[03:08:29.680 --> 03:08:33.280]  In what aspects, civil or criminal, both?
[03:08:34.040 --> 03:08:43.680]  OK, I recognize that that was a loaded question, way too general, but it's kind of trying to
[03:08:43.680 --> 03:08:51.160]  define a different way of looking at this that will lead us to different solutions.
[03:08:51.160 --> 03:08:52.960]  But hang on, I'm going to bring in Sam.
[03:08:52.960 --> 03:09:00.160]  He's been hanging on for quite a while and Chris, don't go away.
[03:09:00.160 --> 03:09:07.960]  For everybody else, Chris is one of the people that are really way up there in my regard.
[03:09:07.960 --> 03:09:10.960]  So I'd like to hear his kind of input.
[03:09:10.960 --> 03:09:15.960]  Sam, what do you have for us today?
[03:09:16.760 --> 03:09:35.160]  I was attacked and robbed by a random guy and they put him in jail and interviewed me
[03:09:35.160 --> 03:09:42.760]  and I told him that he attacked me with a deadly weapon and I tried to retreat.
[03:09:43.560 --> 03:09:46.560]  Hold on, can you understand him?
[03:09:48.560 --> 03:09:56.560]  Yes, he's saying he was attacked and robbed by a random guy.
[03:09:56.560 --> 03:09:59.560]  They put him in jail.
[03:09:59.560 --> 03:10:10.560]  I think he means that some peace officers put the attacker in jail and then he says
[03:10:11.360 --> 03:10:18.360]  that he was giving a statement and was telling them that he was attacked and that the attacker
[03:10:18.360 --> 03:10:20.360]  had a deadly weapon.
[03:10:20.360 --> 03:10:25.360]  All right, go ahead, Sam, can you continue?
[03:10:25.360 --> 03:10:36.360]  His motivation was to steal my electric trike and he couldn't get it running because I had
[03:10:36.360 --> 03:10:37.360]  it unplugged.
[03:10:38.160 --> 03:10:44.160]  The battery was unplugged and the chain was disconnected because it drives by electric
[03:10:44.160 --> 03:10:55.160]  motor and I had my service dog with me and Husky, friendly as hell, never challenged
[03:10:55.160 --> 03:11:06.160]  a human being in his life and he threatened to kill the dog and so I turned the dog loose
[03:11:06.960 --> 03:11:13.960]  and she stayed out of the way and allowed me to be beat up and everything but as soon
[03:11:13.960 --> 03:11:22.960]  as he ran off, because the cops were after him, I ended up waking up in the ambulance.
[03:11:22.960 --> 03:11:29.960]  I don't really remember what happened after he beat me up but there were four witnesses.
[03:11:30.760 --> 03:11:41.760]  One of them called 911 while I was retreating and it was a nightmare but he broke my upper
[03:11:41.760 --> 03:11:52.760]  jaw with his weapon and I didn't go to the hospital right away because I had the dog
[03:11:52.760 --> 03:11:59.760]  and I didn't want to lose the dog because they don't allow them in the hospital and
[03:12:00.760 --> 03:12:09.760]  so I went home, he stole my keys as well, I have three cars, he stole all my keys so
[03:12:09.760 --> 03:12:20.760]  I can't even use my cars without them and I had to break into my RV and while I was
[03:12:20.760 --> 03:12:29.760]  in this condition, I crawled on all fours to get in here and I basically just collapsed
[03:12:29.760 --> 03:12:34.760]  and then I went to the hospital the next day and they did a CAT scan and all that
[03:12:34.760 --> 03:12:41.760]  and they found an infection and it hit me and everything, gave me antibiotics.
[03:12:41.760 --> 03:12:44.760]  Man, I am so sorry, that's awful.
[03:12:44.760 --> 03:12:55.760]  Yeah, it was awful but being a Christian, I did forgive him after a while but I still
[03:12:55.760 --> 03:12:58.760]  don't think he should be allowed on the street.
[03:12:58.760 --> 03:13:11.760]  Now the question is, the district attorney charged him with robbery, not aggravated robbery
[03:13:11.760 --> 03:13:23.760]  which really it was, they didn't charge him with threatening a service dog which is a
[03:13:23.760 --> 03:13:31.760]  federal crime under U.S. Code 18 I think it is.
[03:13:31.760 --> 03:13:38.760]  Okay, well that would be, since it's a federal crime, it would have to be alleged in a federal
[03:13:38.760 --> 03:13:45.760]  court by a federal, somebody who's authorized to represent the United States, same way we
[03:13:45.760 --> 03:13:52.760]  were talking about a district attorney representing Texas, that would be the corollary in the
[03:13:52.760 --> 03:13:53.760]  fed.
[03:13:53.760 --> 03:13:58.760]  Yeah, definitely, hold on just a minute.
[03:13:58.760 --> 03:14:03.760]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[03:14:03.760 --> 03:14:07.760]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[03:14:07.760 --> 03:14:11.760]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[03:14:11.760 --> 03:14:12.760]  can win too.
[03:14:12.760 --> 03:14:17.760]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[03:14:17.760 --> 03:14:18.760]  civil rights statutes.
[03:14:19.760 --> 03:14:22.760]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons.
[03:14:22.760 --> 03:14:24.760]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[03:14:24.760 --> 03:14:27.760]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[03:14:27.760 --> 03:14:32.760]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[03:14:32.760 --> 03:14:37.760]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[03:14:37.760 --> 03:14:39.760]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[03:14:39.760 --> 03:14:45.760]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[03:14:45.760 --> 03:14:47.760]  or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com.
[03:14:47.760 --> 03:14:55.760]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[03:14:55.760 --> 03:14:58.760]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[03:14:58.760 --> 03:14:59.760]  I love logos.
[03:14:59.760 --> 03:15:03.760]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[03:15:03.760 --> 03:15:05.760]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[03:15:05.760 --> 03:15:07.760]  I need my truth fixed.
[03:15:07.760 --> 03:15:11.760]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[03:15:11.760 --> 03:15:15.760]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[03:15:15.760 --> 03:15:18.760]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[03:15:18.760 --> 03:15:20.760]  How can I help logos?
[03:15:20.760 --> 03:15:22.760]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[03:15:22.760 --> 03:15:25.760]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[03:15:25.760 --> 03:15:27.760]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts.
[03:15:27.760 --> 03:15:29.760]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[03:15:29.760 --> 03:15:33.760]  Now go to logosradionetwork.com.
[03:15:33.760 --> 03:15:36.760]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[03:15:36.760 --> 03:15:41.760]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[03:15:41.760 --> 03:15:42.760]  Do I pay extra?
[03:15:42.760 --> 03:15:43.760]  No.
[03:15:43.760 --> 03:15:45.760]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[03:15:45.760 --> 03:15:46.760]  No.
[03:15:46.760 --> 03:15:47.760]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[03:15:47.760 --> 03:15:48.760]  No.
[03:15:48.760 --> 03:15:49.760]  I mean, yes.
[03:15:49.760 --> 03:15:50.760]  Wow.
[03:15:50.760 --> 03:15:52.760]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[03:15:52.760 --> 03:15:54.760]  This is perfect.
[03:15:54.760 --> 03:15:55.760]  Thank you so much.
[03:15:55.760 --> 03:15:56.760]  We are welcome.
[03:15:56.760 --> 03:15:58.760]  Happy holidays, logos.
[03:16:13.760 --> 03:16:38.760]  Thank you.
[03:16:38.760 --> 03:17:01.760]  Thank you.
[03:17:01.760 --> 03:17:25.760]  Okay, we are back.
[03:17:25.760 --> 03:17:39.760]  We're talking to Sam in Texas and you have issues where crimes were committed and the
[03:17:39.760 --> 03:17:50.760]  prosecutor, he's sitting there looking at his docket and his budget and he doesn't consider
[03:17:50.760 --> 03:17:53.760]  this serious enough to bother with.
[03:17:53.760 --> 03:18:00.760]  So question, Sam, why are you even messing with the prosecutor?
[03:18:00.760 --> 03:18:09.760]  Well, I'm disabled and I don't have a car because they got my keys and it's too expensive
[03:18:09.760 --> 03:18:17.760]  to get new keys and I'm on disability and everything.
[03:18:17.760 --> 03:18:18.760]  No, no, no.
[03:18:18.760 --> 03:18:21.760]  I think you're busy.
[03:18:21.760 --> 03:18:30.760]  Why are you trying to get the prosecutor to take your claims when he doesn't have standing
[03:18:30.760 --> 03:18:31.760]  to do that?
[03:18:31.760 --> 03:18:35.760]  In other words, you can do these things yourself.
[03:18:35.760 --> 03:18:41.760]  He may have come up with one that he thought was easy for him, but it doesn't matter.
[03:18:41.760 --> 03:18:45.760]  You can do the rest of them yourself.
[03:18:46.760 --> 03:18:49.760]  If you give notice to a magistrate.
[03:18:49.760 --> 03:18:54.760]  I talked to him on the phone and he said that, I talked to him several times, and he said
[03:18:54.760 --> 03:18:56.760]  that he would like to add more charges.
[03:18:56.760 --> 03:19:04.760]  He turned the guy loose on a personal bond after, I don't know how many months, June,
[03:19:04.760 --> 03:19:07.760]  he was in jail from June until now.
[03:19:07.760 --> 03:19:14.760]  He got me all ready for the trial because the guy didn't want to take a plea bargain
[03:19:14.760 --> 03:19:18.760]  and he scheduled us a trial.
[03:19:18.760 --> 03:19:28.760]  He told me that I was waiting for the ride to go to this court and he told me that the
[03:19:28.760 --> 03:19:35.760]  policeman had to go to the National Guard or something and he couldn't testify.
[03:19:35.760 --> 03:19:36.760]  So what?
[03:19:37.760 --> 03:19:39.760]  Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
[03:19:39.760 --> 03:19:42.760]  The police wasn't there as a witness anyway.
[03:19:42.760 --> 03:19:51.760]  No, he wasn't, but he was going to use him and he said he had to turn the guy loose with
[03:19:51.760 --> 03:19:53.760]  an ankle monitor.
[03:19:53.760 --> 03:19:55.760]  No, he didn't.
[03:19:55.760 --> 03:19:56.760]  I know.
[03:19:56.760 --> 03:19:57.760]  That's what he said though.
[03:19:57.760 --> 03:19:59.760]  And I told him the first day.
[03:19:59.760 --> 03:20:00.760]  Wait a minute, hold on.
[03:20:00.760 --> 03:20:03.760]  Are you dealing with an electrician?
[03:20:03.760 --> 03:20:05.760]  And I said, turn him loose.
[03:20:05.760 --> 03:20:09.760]  The first thing I told him, I said, I'm sure he's going to turn him loose.
[03:20:09.760 --> 03:20:14.760]  Even if he killed me, he would have turned him loose because that's the way they operate.
[03:20:14.760 --> 03:20:22.760]  If it had been against that attorney's wife, what do you think would be happening with
[03:20:22.760 --> 03:20:24.760]  that guy right now?
[03:20:24.760 --> 03:20:32.760]  He would have a whole stack of felonies against him and there wouldn't be any bond.
[03:20:32.760 --> 03:20:37.760]  Well, he doesn't really...
[03:20:37.760 --> 03:20:44.760]  I asked him for a photo, a booking photo, so that I can alert my neighbors when he comes
[03:20:44.760 --> 03:20:54.760]  to kill me to at least maybe give me a chance to fight back or something.
[03:20:54.760 --> 03:21:04.760]  But he's got an ankle monitor that they're not probably even going to monitor.
[03:21:04.760 --> 03:21:13.760]  And he probably could probably find my name and my address and everything else with a
[03:21:13.760 --> 03:21:19.760]  little bit of cooperation from one of his criminal buddies or whatever.
[03:21:19.760 --> 03:21:21.760]  They can make a FOIA request or something.
[03:21:21.760 --> 03:21:22.760]  I don't know.
[03:21:22.760 --> 03:21:29.760]  Or talk to one of the criminal cops they got there.
[03:21:29.760 --> 03:21:31.760]  I didn't do anything wrong.
[03:21:31.760 --> 03:21:35.760]  And basically, they failed us all the way around.
[03:21:35.760 --> 03:21:45.760]  And I don't think that there's any politics that's going to get this in order.
[03:21:45.760 --> 03:21:50.760]  I think that they're just trying to take over this country and just break our hearts.
[03:21:50.760 --> 03:21:55.760]  I really think that's the motive behind the whole behavior that they're doing.
[03:21:55.760 --> 03:22:02.760]  You know, if they were trying to take over the country, it would be easier.
[03:22:02.760 --> 03:22:05.760]  But it's not that simple.
[03:22:05.760 --> 03:22:13.760]  It's the prosecutor has a budget and he has all the stuff he can handle.
[03:22:13.760 --> 03:22:23.760]  So while this is really important to you, it's not really important to the prosecutor.
[03:22:23.760 --> 03:22:29.760]  So we have to make it important to the prosecutor.
[03:22:29.760 --> 03:22:38.760]  And when it comes to whether or not a crime is adjudicated, that's not his place to make
[03:22:38.760 --> 03:22:39.760]  a determination on.
[03:22:39.760 --> 03:22:43.760]  They want it so they can control the docket.
[03:22:43.760 --> 03:22:49.760]  But according to law, you don't report crimes to prosecutors.
[03:22:49.760 --> 03:22:53.760]  You report them to magistrates.
[03:22:53.760 --> 03:22:58.760]  And every judge in the state of Texas is a magistrate.
[03:22:58.760 --> 03:23:00.760]  They have two hats.
[03:23:00.760 --> 03:23:03.760]  One hat is a judge's hat.
[03:23:03.760 --> 03:23:05.760]  And the other hat is a magistrate's hat.
[03:23:05.760 --> 03:23:10.760]  So I go into court and I go up to the bailiff and I tell him instruct the judge that I have
[03:23:10.760 --> 03:23:11.760]  business with court.
[03:23:11.760 --> 03:23:13.760]  May I tell him the nature of the business?
[03:23:13.760 --> 03:23:14.760]  Yes, you may.
[03:23:14.760 --> 03:23:15.760]  Give him this.
[03:23:15.760 --> 03:23:17.760]  And he said, what is it?
[03:23:17.760 --> 03:23:20.760]  And it's a verified criminal affidavit.
[03:23:20.760 --> 03:23:24.760]  It invokes the duty of the court.
[03:23:24.760 --> 03:23:32.760]  So you've got this prosecutor over here who's doing this juggling act to clear his docket
[03:23:32.760 --> 03:23:37.760]  to adjudicate all the cases in front of him.
[03:23:37.760 --> 03:23:42.760]  The fact that you were harmed by it, you know, he hears that all day, every day.
[03:23:42.760 --> 03:23:44.760]  He's not impressed.
[03:23:44.760 --> 03:23:47.760]  He's just trying to clear his docket.
[03:23:47.760 --> 03:23:50.760]  So how do you fix this?
[03:23:50.760 --> 03:23:53.760]  You raise the stakes.
[03:23:53.760 --> 03:23:57.760]  You bargrieve every prosecutor working for him.
[03:23:57.760 --> 03:24:10.760]  I filed a complaint against the accused with a magistrate and forced the prosecutor to come
[03:24:10.760 --> 03:24:14.760]  before the court in a hearing on your criminal complaint.
[03:24:14.760 --> 03:24:18.760]  See, criminal complaints are not filed with prosecutors.
[03:24:18.760 --> 03:24:29.760]  And our legislatures went to great trouble to limit the powers of a prosecutor.
[03:24:29.760 --> 03:24:34.760]  So they put these procedures in place.
[03:24:34.760 --> 03:24:39.760]  But if you go to the justice system, they're going to send you to the prosecutor so they can
[03:24:39.760 --> 03:24:44.760]  most efficiently adjudicate their caseload.
[03:24:44.760 --> 03:24:51.760]  It's not because the bad guys, they just got a caseload and they got a budget and the budget's
[03:24:51.760 --> 03:24:55.760]  not big enough to handle the caseload.
[03:24:55.760 --> 03:24:58.760]  It's not about them having it out against you.
[03:24:58.760 --> 03:25:01.760]  It's always about the money.
[03:25:01.760 --> 03:25:03.760]  So he don't want to do this job.
[03:25:03.760 --> 03:25:05.760]  He's got all he can handle.
[03:25:05.760 --> 03:25:12.760]  And the only way he's going to do this job is if you kick his butt and make it more costly
[03:25:12.760 --> 03:25:20.760]  and difficult for him not to prosecute this guy that harmed you.
[03:25:20.760 --> 03:25:27.760]  That's not specifics on what you should do directly, but it's a philosophy behind which you
[03:25:27.760 --> 03:25:33.760]  should operate.
[03:25:33.760 --> 03:25:39.760]  Did you listen to our show regular?
[03:25:39.760 --> 03:25:43.760]  Sam?
[03:25:43.760 --> 03:25:44.760]  Oh, wait.
[03:25:44.760 --> 03:25:46.760]  Sam's mutant.
[03:25:46.760 --> 03:25:47.760]  Okay.
[03:25:47.760 --> 03:25:48.760]  There we go.
[03:25:48.760 --> 03:25:50.760]  Sam, now you're live.
[03:25:50.760 --> 03:25:53.760]  Sam, is this something you do regularly?
[03:25:53.760 --> 03:25:56.760]  Do you listen to our show regularly?
[03:25:56.760 --> 03:25:58.760]  Yes.
[03:25:58.760 --> 03:26:04.760]  Then you understand that we as individuals, we have powers to go after them.
[03:26:04.760 --> 03:26:12.760]  So if the prosecutor, if he fails to perform a duty he's required to perform in the process,
[03:26:12.760 --> 03:26:19.760]  nice uniform, free access to enjoyment right, you have grounds to go after him.
[03:26:19.760 --> 03:26:21.760]  The prosecutor is busy.
[03:26:21.760 --> 03:26:30.760]  He's got this docket here he's trying to clear, and you're not high up on the agenda.
[03:26:30.760 --> 03:26:36.760]  So how do you raise yourself on his agenda?
[03:26:36.760 --> 03:26:37.760]  Or grievances?
[03:26:37.760 --> 03:26:43.760]  Well, I guess I could call.
[03:26:43.760 --> 03:26:45.760]  Call him?
[03:26:45.760 --> 03:26:51.760]  You call him, he's going to do shucking and jiving, song and dance, seltzer down your pants,
[03:26:51.760 --> 03:26:55.760]  beat you a bunch of crap, and then go ahead and do what he wants to do.
[03:26:55.760 --> 03:26:59.760]  Hang on, we'll talk about how to get this handled.
[03:26:59.760 --> 03:27:03.760]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[03:27:03.760 --> 03:27:10.760]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[03:27:10.760 --> 03:27:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[03:27:14.760 --> 03:27:16.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[03:27:16.760 --> 03:27:20.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[03:27:20.760 --> 03:27:25.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:27:25.760 --> 03:27:30.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[03:27:30.760 --> 03:27:33.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[03:27:33.760 --> 03:27:40.760]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[03:27:40.760 --> 03:27:44.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[03:27:44.760 --> 03:27:51.760]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your home too, with a smart grid.
[03:27:51.760 --> 03:27:58.760]  We're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[03:27:58.760 --> 03:28:02.760]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast.
[03:28:02.760 --> 03:28:07.760]  If we make the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day.
[03:28:07.760 --> 03:28:13.760]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
[03:28:13.760 --> 03:28:17.760]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[03:28:17.760 --> 03:28:22.760]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing smart about that.
[03:28:22.760 --> 03:28:29.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:28:29.760 --> 03:28:35.760]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[03:28:35.760 --> 03:28:37.760]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[03:28:37.760 --> 03:28:42.760]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[03:28:42.760 --> 03:28:45.760]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[03:28:45.760 --> 03:28:47.760]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[03:28:47.760 --> 03:28:49.760]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[03:28:49.760 --> 03:28:50.760]  I'm a structural engineer.
[03:28:50.760 --> 03:28:51.760]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[03:28:51.760 --> 03:28:52.760]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[03:28:52.760 --> 03:28:54.760]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[03:28:54.760 --> 03:28:56.760]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[03:28:56.760 --> 03:28:59.760]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[03:29:01.760 --> 03:29:04.760]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[03:29:04.760 --> 03:29:06.760]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[03:29:06.760 --> 03:29:12.760]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[03:29:12.760 --> 03:29:19.760]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[03:29:19.760 --> 03:29:25.760]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[03:29:25.760 --> 03:29:34.760]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[03:29:34.760 --> 03:29:40.760]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[03:29:40.760 --> 03:29:50.760]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[03:29:50.760 --> 03:29:54.760]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[03:29:54.760 --> 03:29:58.760]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[03:30:01.760 --> 03:30:07.760]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[03:30:11.760 --> 03:30:19.760]  I see a tool, I see a tool.
[03:30:19.760 --> 03:30:23.760]  The evidence of events in this room.
[03:30:23.760 --> 03:30:26.760]  I see tools of ingenuity.
[03:30:26.760 --> 03:30:29.760]  The use against the workers of iniquity.
[03:30:29.760 --> 03:30:32.760]  Tools of mass capability.
[03:30:32.760 --> 03:30:35.760]  Failure, but we're all eternity.
[03:30:35.760 --> 03:30:38.760]  They come from natural divinity.
[03:30:38.760 --> 03:30:41.760]  I see a tool that finds roots in authenticity.
[03:30:41.760 --> 03:30:44.760]  I see tools to regain iniquity.
[03:30:44.760 --> 03:30:47.760]  Rebuild the credibility.
[03:30:47.760 --> 03:30:54.760]  And I say, truth in nature must be justice, I believe.
[03:30:54.760 --> 03:31:00.760]  Truth in nature must be justice.
[03:31:00.760 --> 03:31:03.760]  And love is a daunting task.
[03:31:03.760 --> 03:31:05.760]  At least I've got the decency.
[03:31:05.760 --> 03:31:09.760]  I've sent them all to just take off the silly minds.
[03:31:09.760 --> 03:31:12.760]  And in the light of day we all will rise.
[03:31:12.760 --> 03:31:15.760]  And there'll be tools of ingenuity.
[03:31:15.760 --> 03:31:18.760]  The use against the workers of iniquity.
[03:31:18.760 --> 03:31:21.760]  Tools of ingenuity.
[03:31:21.760 --> 03:31:24.760]  The use against the workers of iniquity.
[03:31:24.760 --> 03:31:32.760]  And we're talking to Sam in Texas, and Sam, I guess the question to ask is,
[03:31:32.760 --> 03:31:39.760]  what is it that you want to accomplish at the end of the day?
[03:31:39.760 --> 03:31:51.760]  What for you, in this case, would be a positive and acceptable outcome?
[03:31:51.760 --> 03:32:01.760]  Well, I would like my neighborhood to be improved by not having him on the street.
[03:32:01.760 --> 03:32:08.760]  Robbing people obviously has no skills.
[03:32:08.760 --> 03:32:11.760]  Okay, okay. Hold on, hold on.
[03:32:11.760 --> 03:32:13.760]  He's 30 years old.
[03:32:13.760 --> 03:32:16.760]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[03:32:16.760 --> 03:32:21.760]  I need to be more specific.
[03:32:21.760 --> 03:32:27.760]  We would all like all the criminals to be off the street.
[03:32:27.760 --> 03:32:33.760]  You've got this criminal who's perpetrated criminal acts,
[03:32:33.760 --> 03:32:40.760]  and you've got this prosecutor who's busy and doesn't necessarily want to spend time on it.
[03:32:40.760 --> 03:32:52.760]  In this case, what for you would be an equitable outcome?
[03:32:52.760 --> 03:32:56.760]  Well, they promised me at McDonald's,
[03:32:56.760 --> 03:33:01.760]  they came to interview me down at McDonald's, four of them.
[03:33:01.760 --> 03:33:11.760]  One sergeant from the police, and he talked to my dad in New York,
[03:33:11.760 --> 03:33:22.760]  and he's, there's a victim's guy, and then there's two...
[03:33:22.760 --> 03:33:25.760]  Brett, do you understand that I'm missing most of that?
[03:33:25.760 --> 03:33:29.760]  It seems like he's cutting out.
[03:33:29.760 --> 03:33:33.760]  It looks like we lost him.
[03:33:33.760 --> 03:33:37.760]  Sam, are you there? Oh, yeah, he just disappeared.
[03:33:37.760 --> 03:33:40.760]  He just dropped off the bridge.
[03:33:40.760 --> 03:33:42.760]  Dr. Joe?
[03:33:42.760 --> 03:33:44.760]  Randy Kelton.
[03:33:44.760 --> 03:33:46.760]  Oh, okay.
[03:33:46.760 --> 03:33:48.760]  We lost Sam.
[03:33:48.760 --> 03:33:50.760]  I was going to ask you what happened because...
[03:33:50.760 --> 03:33:51.760]  There he is, he's back.
[03:33:51.760 --> 03:33:53.760]  Dr. Joe knows everything, but...
[03:33:53.760 --> 03:33:55.760]  All right, Sam, there you are.
[03:33:55.760 --> 03:33:59.760]  My phone dropped a call twice.
[03:33:59.760 --> 03:34:00.760]  All right.
[03:34:00.760 --> 03:34:11.760]  Anyway, they've spent a lot of time on this case,
[03:34:11.760 --> 03:34:16.760]  going through all the details and all the stuff that I could remember,
[03:34:16.760 --> 03:34:19.760]  and they got four witnesses they interviewed,
[03:34:19.760 --> 03:34:22.760]  they went through all kinds of things,
[03:34:22.760 --> 03:34:24.760]  and then they just turned the guy loose.
[03:34:24.760 --> 03:34:26.760]  I don't understand what the heck they're talking about.
[03:34:26.760 --> 03:34:29.760]  If their budget is so slim,
[03:34:29.760 --> 03:34:36.760]  how do they get the time to come to me with the cops and the prosecutors,
[03:34:36.760 --> 03:34:40.760]  the actual prosecutors, the DA actually met with me,
[03:34:40.760 --> 03:34:48.760]  and how do they not have a budget?
[03:34:48.760 --> 03:34:50.760]  What's going on with that?
[03:34:50.760 --> 03:34:54.760]  If they don't have a budget, why does it blow me off?
[03:34:54.760 --> 03:34:57.760]  It made me to believe that they were going to be on top of this,
[03:34:57.760 --> 03:35:00.760]  and I got all dressed up and woke up early in the morning
[03:35:00.760 --> 03:35:03.760]  and got ready to go to court and all of a sudden...
[03:35:03.760 --> 03:35:08.760]  Okay, Sam, Sam, I got bad news for you.
[03:35:08.760 --> 03:35:14.760]  Things are not the way they told you they were in high school.
[03:35:14.760 --> 03:35:18.760]  At the end of the day, everything's about the money.
[03:35:18.760 --> 03:35:21.760]  We have policemen and you have prosecutors
[03:35:21.760 --> 03:35:26.760]  who really want to be the good guys and do the right thing,
[03:35:26.760 --> 03:35:36.760]  but they are all constrained with money and functionality.
[03:35:36.760 --> 03:35:42.760]  They're struggling, and I'm not saying let's just be nice to them.
[03:35:42.760 --> 03:35:46.760]  I revel in kicking these public officials behind,
[03:35:47.760 --> 03:35:50.760]  because the only way we're going to fix it
[03:35:50.760 --> 03:35:53.760]  is by going after the guys on the bottom
[03:35:53.760 --> 03:35:56.760]  and sticking them on the guys at the top.
[03:35:56.760 --> 03:36:01.760]  And then you've got these groups out there that want to defund the police.
[03:36:01.760 --> 03:36:05.760]  So you've got this prosecutor here trying to prosecute this case,
[03:36:05.760 --> 03:36:10.760]  and he's got all these pressures coming at him.
[03:36:10.760 --> 03:36:14.760]  How do you arrange what you're doing
[03:36:14.760 --> 03:36:18.760]  so that what you're asking the prosecutor to do
[03:36:18.760 --> 03:36:23.760]  coincides with something he can actually do?
[03:36:23.760 --> 03:36:27.760]  What do you want the prosecutor to do?
[03:36:28.760 --> 03:36:34.760]  Um, he had everybody in line.
[03:36:40.760 --> 03:36:42.760]  Sorry, go ahead.
[03:36:42.760 --> 03:36:44.760]  You broke up there.
[03:36:44.760 --> 03:36:46.760]  He had everybody in line to go to court.
[03:36:46.760 --> 03:36:50.760]  Everything was arranged. He had a ride arranged to me.
[03:36:50.760 --> 03:36:54.760]  He had the witnesses in the court,
[03:36:54.760 --> 03:36:57.760]  and then all of a sudden,
[03:36:57.760 --> 03:37:02.760]  just because one cop that didn't see a damn thing
[03:37:02.760 --> 03:37:04.760]  had to go to the military,
[03:37:04.760 --> 03:37:09.760]  the case got pushed off.
[03:37:09.760 --> 03:37:11.760]  So are you understanding that, Randy?
[03:37:11.760 --> 03:37:13.760]  No.
[03:37:13.760 --> 03:37:17.760]  Sam is upset because they called off the court.
[03:37:17.760 --> 03:37:19.760]  They were going to have court.
[03:37:19.760 --> 03:37:26.760]  The prosecutor had arranged for this court hearing to happen,
[03:37:26.760 --> 03:37:30.760]  and the prosecutor called it all off
[03:37:30.760 --> 03:37:38.760]  because a police officer was unable to attend.
[03:37:38.760 --> 03:37:41.760]  Now, this police officer was immaterial.
[03:37:41.760 --> 03:37:43.760]  He couldn't be called up as a witness.
[03:37:43.760 --> 03:37:45.760]  He saw nothing. He knew nothing.
[03:37:45.760 --> 03:37:48.760]  Was he, was the police officer the one
[03:37:48.760 --> 03:37:54.760]  who wrote the original citation or complaint?
[03:37:54.760 --> 03:37:56.760]  I don't know yet, but that's what he was saying,
[03:37:56.760 --> 03:38:02.760]  that the police officer that was going to be called up
[03:38:02.760 --> 03:38:05.760]  and who had no personal knowledge,
[03:38:05.760 --> 03:38:09.760]  he was the one who was unable to attend,
[03:38:09.760 --> 03:38:12.760]  and so then the prosecutor did something
[03:38:12.760 --> 03:38:14.760]  to call off the entire case.
[03:38:14.760 --> 03:38:17.760]  What relevance did this officer have to the case?
[03:38:17.760 --> 03:38:22.760]  What did he know that he could testify to?
[03:38:22.760 --> 03:38:25.760]  I wasn't told.
[03:38:25.760 --> 03:38:29.760]  Whoa.
[03:38:29.760 --> 03:38:33.760]  Were you at the hearing?
[03:38:33.760 --> 03:38:36.760]  No, they said I didn't have to attend.
[03:38:36.760 --> 03:38:38.760]  It's not a matter of whether you have to attend or not.
[03:38:38.760 --> 03:38:39.760]  Have to?
[03:38:39.760 --> 03:38:41.760]  You want to be the...
[03:38:41.760 --> 03:38:42.760]  That's what they said.
[03:38:42.760 --> 03:38:45.760]  They discouraged me from going.
[03:38:45.760 --> 03:38:47.760]  Yeah, you allow that,
[03:38:47.760 --> 03:38:50.760]  and they're going to do what's expedient for them.
[03:38:50.760 --> 03:38:53.760]  Yeah.
[03:38:53.760 --> 03:38:58.760]  The prosecution of law is about expediency,
[03:38:58.760 --> 03:39:00.760]  not about what's right or wrong,
[03:39:00.760 --> 03:39:05.760]  so you have to hold the prosecutor's feet to the fire.
[03:39:05.760 --> 03:39:10.760]  Sam, what do you know about bar grievances?
[03:39:10.760 --> 03:39:13.760]  I've never performed one,
[03:39:13.760 --> 03:39:19.760]  but I studied it for a while,
[03:39:19.760 --> 03:39:23.760]  for about ten hours.
[03:39:23.760 --> 03:39:27.760]  In saying that, I may be premature.
[03:39:27.760 --> 03:39:31.760]  The prosecutor has pursued this guy, arrested him.
[03:39:31.760 --> 03:39:35.760]  Do you have an indictment on him?
[03:39:36.760 --> 03:39:42.760]  He must, because he had him in jail since June.
[03:39:42.760 --> 03:39:46.760]  Could you understand that, Brad? I couldn't.
[03:39:46.760 --> 03:39:47.760]  No.
[03:39:47.760 --> 03:39:50.760]  He had him in jail since June,
[03:39:50.760 --> 03:39:55.760]  so he had to have some type of indictment.
[03:39:55.760 --> 03:40:00.760]  Okay, what was he charged with?
[03:40:01.760 --> 03:40:06.760]  Failure to identify, robbery...
[03:40:09.760 --> 03:40:12.760]  Failure to identify?
[03:40:12.760 --> 03:40:14.760]  Yeah.
[03:40:14.760 --> 03:40:16.760]  That's a secondary issue.
[03:40:16.760 --> 03:40:18.760]  That's not even an arrestable offense.
[03:40:18.760 --> 03:40:21.760]  No, I'm just asking him what he was charged with.
[03:40:21.760 --> 03:40:24.760]  So the failure to identify and robbery.
[03:40:24.760 --> 03:40:27.760]  Robbery is the one, that's the big one.
[03:40:27.760 --> 03:40:30.760]  Right, and then another...
[03:40:30.760 --> 03:40:33.760]  something to do with stealing something.
[03:40:33.760 --> 03:40:36.760]  Well, it should be, what you could be,
[03:40:36.760 --> 03:40:39.760]  I'm not saying should, but you could go ahead
[03:40:39.760 --> 03:40:42.760]  and write up your unsworn criminal complaints
[03:40:42.760 --> 03:40:47.760]  for aggravated robbery and aggravated assault.
[03:40:47.760 --> 03:40:50.760]  Get some felonies going in there,
[03:40:50.760 --> 03:40:53.760]  and, you know, pursue that.
[03:40:53.760 --> 03:40:56.760]  File that with some magistrate.
[03:41:23.760 --> 03:41:26.760]  Provide your employees with doctors, medications,
[03:41:26.760 --> 03:41:30.760]  emergency care, and Teladoc, all at zero cost,
[03:41:30.760 --> 03:41:32.760]  with zero copay.
[03:41:32.760 --> 03:41:35.760]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise
[03:41:35.760 --> 03:41:38.760]  by paying less than FICA taxes.
[03:41:38.760 --> 03:41:42.760]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars
[03:41:42.760 --> 03:41:44.760]  in matching FICA taxes.
[03:41:44.760 --> 03:41:47.760]  The Champ Plan can help add working capital,
[03:41:47.760 --> 03:41:50.760]  market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[03:41:50.760 --> 03:41:58.760]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[03:42:01.760 --> 03:42:04.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[03:42:04.760 --> 03:42:07.760]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[03:42:07.760 --> 03:42:11.760]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[03:42:11.760 --> 03:42:15.760]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[03:42:15.760 --> 03:42:19.760]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[03:42:19.760 --> 03:42:23.760]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[03:42:23.760 --> 03:42:26.760]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course,
[03:42:26.760 --> 03:42:28.760]  and now you can too.
[03:42:28.760 --> 03:42:31.760]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[03:42:31.760 --> 03:42:34.760]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[03:42:34.760 --> 03:42:36.760]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[03:42:36.760 --> 03:42:39.760]  you can learn what everyone should understand
[03:42:39.760 --> 03:42:41.760]  about the principles and practices
[03:42:41.760 --> 03:42:43.760]  that control our American courts.
[03:42:43.760 --> 03:42:47.760]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[03:42:47.760 --> 03:42:50.760]  tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[03:42:50.760 --> 03:42:53.760]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[03:42:53.760 --> 03:42:57.760]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[03:42:57.760 --> 03:43:01.760]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[03:43:48.760 --> 03:43:53.760]  The people come down from the hills
[03:43:56.760 --> 03:44:01.760]  Into the city they will shuffle
[03:44:04.760 --> 03:44:09.760]  Many long nights, many strong thrills
[03:44:11.760 --> 03:44:16.760]  Land of comfort, land of scuffle
[03:44:18.760 --> 03:44:21.760]  It's hard to lose
[03:44:22.760 --> 03:44:25.760]  And it's hard to hold
[03:44:27.760 --> 03:44:32.760]  Far back as they remember, they've been told
[03:44:48.760 --> 03:44:51.760]  Did they steal it from you directly,
[03:44:51.760 --> 03:44:54.760]  or was it one of these that you rent?
[03:44:55.760 --> 03:44:57.760]  It was mine.
[03:44:58.760 --> 03:45:00.760]  Okay.
[03:45:01.760 --> 03:45:05.760]  Have you been able to use it subsequently?
[03:45:06.760 --> 03:45:10.760]  Yes, I just plugged the battery in and drove off.
[03:45:11.760 --> 03:45:13.760]  Okay.
[03:45:14.760 --> 03:45:18.760]  He couldn't get it running.
[03:45:20.760 --> 03:45:24.760]  Okay, so the guy tried to rob you.
[03:45:24.760 --> 03:45:30.760]  The prosecutor is prosecuting him for, what, two counts?
[03:45:32.760 --> 03:45:40.760]  I think it's some technical thing with automotive,
[03:45:40.760 --> 03:45:44.760]  I think because he stole my keys.
[03:45:44.760 --> 03:45:46.760]  They're very expensive.
[03:45:46.760 --> 03:45:53.760]  And they asked me if he put his feet on the pedals.
[03:45:53.760 --> 03:45:55.760]  I said yes.
[03:45:56.760 --> 03:46:01.760]  He tried to drive off on the trike,
[03:46:01.760 --> 03:46:03.760]  but he couldn't get it running.
[03:46:03.760 --> 03:46:07.760]  And I told him it didn't work.
[03:46:07.760 --> 03:46:09.760]  And he got mad.
[03:46:09.760 --> 03:46:15.760]  And then he walked by me and punched me in the face.
[03:46:15.760 --> 03:46:20.760]  And then he went over to where I was sitting
[03:46:20.760 --> 03:46:25.760]  and grabbed my shoes off the concrete
[03:46:25.760 --> 03:46:28.760]  and threw them in the street.
[03:46:28.760 --> 03:46:32.760]  And then he pulled out his weapon and he came after me with it.
[03:46:32.760 --> 03:46:37.760]  And I retreated after I let the dog go.
[03:46:37.760 --> 03:46:42.760]  And he caught me in the middle of the street after I ran around the car.
[03:46:42.760 --> 03:46:45.760]  There was a car at the stop sign.
[03:46:45.760 --> 03:46:50.760]  And I ran around the car and he said, nobody's going to help you.
[03:46:50.760 --> 03:46:54.760]  And I asked the guy to call 911.
[03:46:54.760 --> 03:46:56.760]  And then I took off towards the restaurant
[03:46:56.760 --> 03:46:59.760]  and he caught me in the middle of the street
[03:46:59.760 --> 03:47:05.760]  and knocked me out and repeatedly hit me with whatever,
[03:47:05.760 --> 03:47:08.760]  I don't know what happened after.
[03:47:08.760 --> 03:47:10.760]  But the witnesses saw it,
[03:47:10.760 --> 03:47:14.760]  and I didn't talk to any of those guys.
[03:47:14.760 --> 03:47:18.760]  But I asked the policeman if he had the right guy,
[03:47:18.760 --> 03:47:26.760]  did he have a padlock and a chain that he used on me?
[03:47:26.760 --> 03:47:28.760]  And he said yes, he did.
[03:47:28.760 --> 03:47:32.760]  So I know that he had the right guy.
[03:47:32.760 --> 03:47:37.760]  But I never got a mugshot photo off the internet
[03:47:37.760 --> 03:47:41.760]  or from the police website.
[03:47:41.760 --> 03:47:45.760]  And I asked the DA, since they turned him loose,
[03:47:45.760 --> 03:47:50.760]  I asked the DA for a mugshot and he said he would email it to me.
[03:47:50.760 --> 03:47:55.760]  He never did.
[03:47:55.760 --> 03:48:05.760]  He told me that he was going to give him restrictions on where he could go.
[03:48:05.760 --> 03:48:09.760]  But I don't think the guy reads the law or even cares about the law.
[03:48:09.760 --> 03:48:11.760]  He's a repeat offender.
[03:48:11.760 --> 03:48:17.760]  I got that out of the DA anyway.
[03:48:17.760 --> 03:48:18.760]  He's a bad guy.
[03:48:18.760 --> 03:48:39.760]  He probably wanted to kill me, but he didn't have the time.
[03:48:39.760 --> 03:48:45.760]  So at this point it looks to me like you are concerned.
[03:48:45.760 --> 03:48:53.760]  You're trying to decide right now whether you're going to man up
[03:48:53.760 --> 03:49:00.760]  and hold him accountable for these things on paper
[03:49:00.760 --> 03:49:05.760]  and drag him into the quicksands of court, so to speak,
[03:49:05.760 --> 03:49:10.760]  because that's a pain and nobody's going to do it for you.
[03:49:10.760 --> 03:49:12.760]  You're the one that's going to have to do it.
[03:49:12.760 --> 03:49:16.760]  It's not something that you can do with your thumbs on a phone.
[03:49:16.760 --> 03:49:18.760]  It's going to be kind of a pain.
[03:49:18.760 --> 03:49:23.760]  So you're faced with this decision of stepping up to do that.
[03:49:23.760 --> 03:49:27.760]  But you've also voiced some concern about your life
[03:49:27.760 --> 03:49:30.760]  now that they've let this guy out.
[03:49:30.760 --> 03:49:37.760]  He obviously is willing to be a murderer,
[03:49:37.760 --> 03:49:41.760]  even though he didn't quite succeed in his efforts before.
[03:49:41.760 --> 03:49:47.760]  He's not able to control his own violence.
[03:49:47.760 --> 03:49:52.760]  And so the fact that he attacked you before with a deadly weapon
[03:49:52.760 --> 03:49:57.760]  and he has your keys to your house, these are reasons for concern.
[03:49:57.760 --> 03:50:03.760]  And I think you need to also face that with some gravity
[03:50:03.760 --> 03:50:07.760]  and not just whining and expecting somebody to do something about it for you.
[03:50:07.760 --> 03:50:16.760]  Yes, your public officials should take this seriously,
[03:50:16.760 --> 03:50:20.760]  but you have to take it seriously even if they don't.
[03:50:20.760 --> 03:50:24.760]  And you have to make it matter for your safety
[03:50:24.760 --> 03:50:26.760]  and for anybody else who's at your house.
[03:50:26.760 --> 03:50:36.760]  You have to take it seriously and treat it with the gravity that it needs.
[03:50:37.760 --> 03:50:38.760]  Does that make sense?
[03:50:38.760 --> 03:50:40.760]  Right. Yes, it does.
[03:50:40.760 --> 03:50:45.760]  And there's people that live on this property that could be hurt by him
[03:50:45.760 --> 03:50:48.760]  if he decides to go berserk again.
[03:50:48.760 --> 03:50:53.760]  Why would...
[03:50:53.760 --> 03:50:54.760]  Yeah, and he's got your keys.
[03:50:54.760 --> 03:50:56.760]  He's got nine years for this crime.
[03:50:56.760 --> 03:50:58.760]  You can get 99 years.
[03:50:58.760 --> 03:51:07.760]  Why would they let him out on a personal bond?
[03:51:07.760 --> 03:51:13.760]  Yeah, perhaps because what they were charging him for was not serious enough
[03:51:13.760 --> 03:51:19.760]  and they didn't have the documents from you or from the prosecutor.
[03:51:19.760 --> 03:51:21.760]  They could have gotten it from the prosecutor,
[03:51:21.760 --> 03:51:28.760]  but really it's you that needs to be spearheading this,
[03:51:28.760 --> 03:51:34.760]  making sure that the facts that show the weight of his wrongdoing,
[03:51:34.760 --> 03:51:41.760]  those facts need to end up in front of a magistrate or in front of the grand jury
[03:51:41.760 --> 03:51:43.760]  if the prosecutor's not handling that.
[03:51:43.760 --> 03:51:46.760]  You know, the prosecutor, like kind of like Randy was talking about earlier,
[03:51:46.760 --> 03:51:48.760]  hey, he's busy, he's got all these other cases,
[03:51:48.760 --> 03:51:51.760]  he doesn't want to contribute to his own workload,
[03:51:51.760 --> 03:51:56.760]  he doesn't want to do work that's going to create more work for him himself.
[03:51:56.760 --> 03:52:01.760]  He's, you know, more inclined to just, well, just kind of juggle the plates
[03:52:01.760 --> 03:52:04.760]  and here I'll just kind of slap at this one and that one
[03:52:04.760 --> 03:52:11.760]  and then he's not concerned for his life.
[03:52:11.760 --> 03:52:17.760]  This prosecutor is, it doesn't make any difference
[03:52:17.760 --> 03:52:22.760]  if something happens to you, he's going to be fine.
[03:52:22.760 --> 03:52:29.760]  So you're the one that's going to have to drive this.
[03:52:29.760 --> 03:52:33.760]  Right, so what I'm going to do is I'm going to give the prosecutor an opportunity
[03:52:33.760 --> 03:52:40.760]  to show what his plan is to go to prosecute.
[03:52:40.760 --> 03:52:43.760]  And if he doesn't, I'm going to have to take steps myself.
[03:52:43.760 --> 03:52:54.760]  Now, I haven't given him a chance to, like, respond.
[03:52:54.760 --> 03:52:57.760]  So how about this, take your, you said you've got three cars
[03:52:57.760 --> 03:52:59.760]  and he's got the keys to all of them.
[03:52:59.760 --> 03:53:02.760]  You've got your house, he's got keys to your house.
[03:53:02.760 --> 03:53:06.760]  Change the locks, like tomorrow morning, change the locks on your house
[03:53:06.760 --> 03:53:09.760]  so that he doesn't have keys to get inside your house.
[03:53:09.760 --> 03:53:14.760]  And take your cars and park them somewhere else or on the,
[03:53:14.760 --> 03:53:16.760]  you know, you said it's a big property, park it somewhere else
[03:53:16.760 --> 03:53:19.760]  on a different part of the property, put it in a garage or a workshop
[03:53:19.760 --> 03:53:22.760]  or something so it's not so obvious.
[03:53:22.760 --> 03:53:24.760]  Sorry?
[03:53:24.760 --> 03:53:28.760]  There's no batteries, you can't start the cars anyway.
[03:53:28.760 --> 03:53:35.760]  Okay, well, some people might come with a battery or have a, well, okay.
[03:53:35.760 --> 03:53:38.760]  So, yeah, you're taking some kind of precautions
[03:53:38.760 --> 03:53:43.760]  to try to prevent additional thefts, so that's good.
[03:53:43.760 --> 03:53:46.760]  Put up cameras, you know, go down and get some trail cams.
[03:53:46.760 --> 03:53:50.760]  Put up cameras on your property, point them at the entrances
[03:53:50.760 --> 03:53:55.760]  and point them at locations where, you know, people might be coming in
[03:53:55.760 --> 03:54:03.760]  and make it where somebody that's, you kind of can expect that he's coming.
[03:54:03.760 --> 03:54:09.760]  So go ahead and take some measures.
[03:54:09.760 --> 03:54:20.760]  Right, there's no neighbors around me, I don't neighbors.
[03:54:20.760 --> 03:54:24.760]  So there's nobody going to witness anything.
[03:54:24.760 --> 03:54:26.760]  Right, so put up some trail cams.
[03:54:26.760 --> 03:54:31.760]  You know, battery powered, motion activated, they store it to SD card.
[03:54:31.760 --> 03:54:37.760]  Go ahead and if possible, if they can, you can do the Wi-Fi connection
[03:54:37.760 --> 03:54:41.760]  so that they go ahead and upload live, that's great.
[03:54:41.760 --> 03:54:48.760]  So that's for your physical protection.
[03:54:48.760 --> 03:54:54.760]  But then you've also got, go ahead and write up sworn complaints.
[03:54:54.760 --> 03:54:57.760]  You know, I wouldn't worry so much about the service dog thing
[03:54:57.760 --> 03:55:00.760]  that's going to be in the Fed and it's about your dog.
[03:55:00.760 --> 03:55:06.760]  I would start with the ones that you know that you can report that are state crimes.
[03:55:06.760 --> 03:55:11.760]  Go to the district attorney, go to the grand jury, go to a magistrate,
[03:55:11.760 --> 03:55:13.760]  go to several magistrates.
[03:55:13.760 --> 03:55:17.760]  You know, if this were with me, I would take it to dozens of magistrates.
[03:55:17.760 --> 03:55:23.760]  I would send copies of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault.
[03:55:23.760 --> 03:55:26.760]  Put all the facts in there, swear in front of a notary,
[03:55:26.760 --> 03:55:31.760]  make a bunch of copies and go blast to a bunch of magistrates.
[03:55:31.760 --> 03:55:33.760]  You could take it to the grand jury too.
[03:55:33.760 --> 03:55:36.760]  When you make noise like this, and these are felonies,
[03:55:36.760 --> 03:55:38.760]  these are not little things, they're felonies.
[03:55:38.760 --> 03:55:42.760]  So that's what I would say.
[03:55:42.760 --> 03:55:45.760]  Sorry we don't have any more time to talk about it tonight,
[03:55:45.760 --> 03:55:48.760]  but thanks for calling.