ROL_2025-11-06_16k.timecode

Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.240]  against you, that would go over very well at the moment.
[00:05.240 --> 00:14.480]  So I left and went out in the boyer in the courthouse and called 911.
[00:14.480 --> 00:22.740]  Got a South Lake police officer to come down and take my complaint against the judge.
[00:23.740 --> 00:31.540]  In order to demonstrate the nature of the complaint to the officer,
[00:31.540 --> 00:37.060]  I gave him a copy of the lawsuit that I was going to file against the judge.
[00:39.620 --> 00:44.700]  And the secret hope that he would show it to the judge.
[00:46.420 --> 00:52.140]  I wanted the judge to know that I just played him like a cheap fiddle.
[00:52.740 --> 00:57.260]  I had that lawsuit in my hand.
[00:57.260 --> 01:02.860]  When I went in and asked the judge to do something that I was relatively certain
[01:02.860 --> 01:07.420]  he would refuse to do, and he was very accommodating.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.780]  He refused to do it.
[01:10.780 --> 01:14.340]  That was justice to the piece three, Tarrant County, Texas.
[01:15.620 --> 01:19.940]  So I went to justice to the piece four, Tarrant County, Texas, and I sued him.
[01:20.700 --> 01:23.420]  That was fun.
[01:24.420 --> 01:29.340]  And the bailiff there got real nasty with me, so I called 911 on him.
[01:30.580 --> 01:33.740]  And that got real exciting.
[01:34.420 --> 01:36.980]  And then the judge, the clerk, come and said,
[01:36.980 --> 01:39.940]  the judge is off the bench right now, he'll speak with you.
[01:40.260 --> 01:43.460]  And I went inside and the judge is behind this glass thing.
[01:45.380 --> 01:49.420]  I slid under the glass a red folder
[01:49.420 --> 01:52.260]  and I said, Your Honor, I have these for you.
[01:52.260 --> 01:53.580]  And he said, what are those?
[01:53.580 --> 01:56.020]  And I said, those are verified criminal affidavits
[01:56.740 --> 02:01.500]  against justice of the piece three and some various and other slundery
[02:02.060 --> 02:03.620]  public officials.
[02:04.380 --> 02:08.380]  He said, Mr. Kelton, what do you want me to do with these?
[02:09.460 --> 02:14.220]  I want you to do exactly what Article 15.09
[02:14.220 --> 02:16.700]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure commands you to do.
[02:17.300 --> 02:21.340]  And I said, well, before you decide what you're going to do,
[02:22.300 --> 02:26.700]  you might want to get the lawsuit I just filed against JP3
[02:26.700 --> 02:30.180]  and read that before you make a decision.
[02:31.580 --> 02:33.980]  So I left, come back the next day
[02:35.100 --> 02:40.940]  and asked the clerk, what did the judge do with the complaints I gave to him?
[02:41.980 --> 02:45.820]  And she said he forwarded them to the prosecuting attorney.
[02:47.700 --> 02:51.380]  Oh, this is that fact, Jack.
[02:52.420 --> 02:56.820]  So I went to justice of the peace.
[02:56.820 --> 03:00.700]  I was going to justice of the, oh, I went to justice of the peace.
[03:01.740 --> 03:03.380]  Four, no, five.
[03:04.500 --> 03:08.220]  I went to justice piece five and filed suit against this judge.
[03:10.340 --> 03:13.660]  And boy, those folks got real excited.
[03:13.660 --> 03:15.740]  I got a call while I'm talking to him.
[03:15.740 --> 03:18.860]  This is a big office and there's nobody in there.
[03:18.860 --> 03:22.100]  Just I'm the only one of them outside their little glass thing.
[03:22.100 --> 03:24.500]  And I get a call and I answered it.
[03:24.500 --> 03:28.380]  And the clerk said, you can't use a phone in this office.
[03:29.980 --> 03:31.260]  I said, yeah, I can.
[03:32.940 --> 03:34.740]  She got real excited.
[03:35.460 --> 03:38.340]  So I told her, get me the bailiff.
[03:40.260 --> 03:42.220]  And the bailiff come out and he said,
[03:42.380 --> 03:45.060]  and the bailiff come out and he got all huffy puffy.
[03:46.140 --> 03:51.300]  And I kind of climbed down his throat and told him that I wanted him to arrest the clerk.
[03:52.100 --> 03:53.700]  Well, he wasn't going for that.
[03:53.700 --> 03:58.860]  And he made implied threats that he was going to arrest me.
[04:00.820 --> 04:04.420]  I said, look, Bubba, we're all grownups here.
[04:05.700 --> 04:11.020]  And I am not very comfortable with somebody with a pistol on their hip threatening me.
[04:11.980 --> 04:15.220]  If you're not going to do your job, get your butt back in there.
[04:15.220 --> 04:17.460]  That office would get me someone who will.
[04:17.460 --> 04:22.900]  Well, he didn't take that too well, but he didn't pursue.
[04:23.940 --> 04:26.540]  And I took out my cell phone dial 9-1-1.
[04:26.540 --> 04:31.260]  Well, when I was dialing 9-1-1, he didn't tell me I couldn't use the phone in this office.
[04:32.620 --> 04:35.020]  He kind of took a step back and shut his mouth.
[04:35.180 --> 04:42.780]  And then I had some a number of a couple of sheriff's deputies show this was in Arlington.
[04:42.780 --> 04:45.260]  I had done this before in that particular court.
[04:45.900 --> 04:51.380]  And two Arlington police officers showed up and I had so much fun with them.
[04:52.620 --> 04:55.620]  First thing I told them is I wanted them to arrest the bailiff,
[04:55.940 --> 04:57.940]  and then I wanted them to arrest the judge.
[04:58.900 --> 05:00.820]  And they said, we can't do that.
[05:00.820 --> 05:04.260]  Of course you can. Come on, guys, take your chicken suits off.
[05:04.500 --> 05:05.620]  This would be great fun.
[05:06.980 --> 05:08.740]  And they referred me to their sergeant.
[05:09.700 --> 05:13.860]  So they called their sergeant and the sergeant came out.
[05:14.580 --> 05:18.900]  And I was having a hip problem, so I was sitting down and the sergeant came out.
[05:20.100 --> 05:25.380]  And they indicated that they were pretty leery of the sergeant, just from the way they spoke.
[05:25.380 --> 05:30.020]  And the sergeant got there and she said, what seems to be the problem here?
[05:30.020 --> 05:35.380]  And I said, the problem is, is these two deputies won't take their chicken suit off.
[05:38.180 --> 05:40.900]  She gave me kind of a strange look.
[05:41.700 --> 05:46.660]  And I told her, well, I'm filing criminal charges against the justice of the peace
[05:47.380 --> 05:48.740]  and against the bailiff.
[05:49.780 --> 05:55.380]  And these two officers, they wouldn't take your chicken suit off and take my complaints.
[05:56.020 --> 05:59.140]  So they decided to throw you under the bus instead.
[06:00.820 --> 06:07.540]  These two deputies looked like if they could have found something to crawl under, they would have.
[06:07.540 --> 06:11.060]  And the sergeant looks at both of them and looked at me.
[06:12.340 --> 06:13.860]  What is it that you want?
[06:13.860 --> 06:18.340]  I want you to arrest the bailiff over here for threatening me with a,
[06:18.340 --> 06:27.540]  well, prominently displaying this deadly weapon and arrest the head clerk in there for refusing to
[06:28.020 --> 06:32.580]  take criminal complaints that I'm filing with the justice of the peace.
[06:34.580 --> 06:35.080]  Oops.
[06:36.260 --> 06:40.260]  Then she started doing a little song and dance and self-serve down your pants in the standard.
[06:40.980 --> 06:42.420]  Oh, well, I don't know.
[06:42.420 --> 06:45.220]  You need to take this to the district attorney.
[06:46.660 --> 06:50.100]  Yeah, but the complaints I got are against the district attorney.
[06:52.020 --> 06:53.620]  And they didn't know how to handle it.
[06:53.620 --> 07:03.140]  So I filed suit against JP3 in Southlake with JP4 in Lake Worth.
[07:04.020 --> 07:06.900]  And JP4, he didn't act right on it.
[07:06.900 --> 07:13.620]  So I filed against JP4 with JP, I don't remember what this one is, two?
[07:14.580 --> 07:17.460]  She might've been two in Arlington.
[07:17.460 --> 07:24.020]  And the JP wasn't there to issue warrants.
[07:24.020 --> 07:27.220]  So the next couple of days later, I was, I was pretty sick.
[07:27.220 --> 07:31.780]  So it was a while before I was probably a week later before I was able to function.
[07:33.300 --> 07:37.700]  I went to, I told my phone to give me the
[07:39.940 --> 07:45.540]  address and directions to JP6, but it sent me to JP8.
[07:45.860 --> 07:50.580]  So what I'd had is when I'm giving criminal complaints to these prosecutors,
[07:51.780 --> 07:56.580]  they're telling me that, oh, I'm turning the phone's on.
[07:56.580 --> 07:59.060]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[07:59.060 --> 08:02.580]  I call in number 512-646-1984.
[08:03.140 --> 08:07.700]  So they had been telling me that I need to file my complaints with the prosecuting attorney.
[08:08.340 --> 08:16.900]  So I went to the JP and it turned out they gave me directions to JP8.
[08:18.340 --> 08:25.940]  So I gave JP8 criminal charges against the assistant district attorney that headed up
[08:25.940 --> 08:33.060]  the grand jury, accusing the assistant district attorney of shielding criminal complaints
[08:34.020 --> 08:39.860]  against the district attorney from the grand jury, because I went down to the grand jury
[08:40.500 --> 08:45.700]  and to file criminal complaints against the district attorney, accusing the district attorney
[08:46.420 --> 08:55.140]  of secreting criminal complaints against Fort Worth police officers from the grand jury.
[08:55.140 --> 09:01.860]  And what I accused them of arresting Dr. Joe and taking him to jail instead of directly to
[09:01.860 --> 09:10.740]  the nearest magistrate. Well, this one didn't tell me that I should give my complaints to
[09:10.740 --> 09:19.380]  the district attorney. That wouldn't work out so well because my complaints were against the
[09:19.380 --> 09:24.900]  district attorney. Well, I dropped off my complaints because she wasn't in the office.
[09:25.460 --> 09:28.260]  And then I went to JP6 and gave him the complaints.
[09:29.540 --> 09:35.780]  And he held his something like a hearing and decided that my complaints were insufficient
[09:35.780 --> 09:43.620]  to establish probable cause. Well, we're going to see how that works out. Randy
[09:43.620 --> 09:48.420]  Kelton brought down the jail law video. I'll explain how that works when we come back. So
[09:49.380 --> 09:55.700]  I'm getting pretty well wound up on these guys. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[10:03.940 --> 10:09.860]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[10:09.860 --> 10:14.660]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[10:14.740 --> 10:21.060]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[10:21.060 --> 10:25.780]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[10:25.780 --> 10:32.020]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse
[10:32.020 --> 10:38.020]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young Jevity so much we
[10:38.020 --> 10:44.180]  became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order
[10:44.180 --> 10:51.060]  from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[10:51.060 --> 10:56.500]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[10:56.500 --> 11:02.420]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[11:02.420 --> 11:08.820]  Order now. Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding
[11:08.820 --> 11:15.140]  of His Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for
[11:15.140 --> 11:20.980]  Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[11:21.620 --> 11:26.100]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
[11:26.100 --> 11:31.300]  rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the
[11:31.300 --> 11:36.820]  Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour
[11:36.820 --> 11:41.380]  topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian
[11:41.380 --> 11:46.500]  character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a
[11:46.500 --> 11:52.020]  hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[11:52.020 --> 11:57.860]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[11:57.860 --> 12:03.060]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[12:06.820 --> 12:09.060]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[12:37.220 --> 12:43.540]  Radio and we're talking about a project I've been working on
[12:44.980 --> 12:54.260]  where I start taking these public officials to legal task and it goes to some of my
[12:55.540 --> 13:01.540]  philosophies. I've got a book on the Radio Channel,
[13:01.540 --> 13:15.460]  Legal 101, and in there I have a set of rules and things to do and I'm following those.
[13:17.780 --> 13:22.740]  Taking these public officials on, you have a rule that you never ask a public official
[13:23.460 --> 13:27.300]  to do anything that you actually want them to do
[13:29.540 --> 13:36.420]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not compel them to do.
[13:37.380 --> 13:44.900]  So when they don't do it, you get to hammer them. So in this case, I have this statute in Texas.
[13:45.380 --> 13:56.100]  It is a 15.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and what it says is that one of the complaints
[13:56.100 --> 14:04.340]  forwarded to a magistrate complete in accordance with 1508 and that just establishes the ways you
[14:04.340 --> 14:12.100]  can actually send it to them, phone, fax, email, and it is complete in accordance with 1505 and
[14:12.100 --> 14:18.980]  that establishes the requisites of a complaint. The magistrate shall orthwit issue a warrant.
[14:18.980 --> 14:28.900]  Well, I took them to this JP-8 by mistake and she wasn't in. I was going to JP-6
[14:29.860 --> 14:42.180]  because I sued JP-3 with JP-4 and JP-4, when he got my complaints, didn't issue warrants,
[14:42.180 --> 14:54.900]  so I sued JP-4 with JP-2 and JP-4 immediately, since I sued him, moved my JP-3 suit to JP-6.
[14:55.860 --> 15:03.620]  So I was going to JP-6 but wound up with 8. So I gave my criminal complaints against the
[15:03.620 --> 15:12.820]  district attorney. I left him with JP-8 and then went to JP-6 and JP-6, he was a lot more
[15:12.820 --> 15:19.380]  professional and had himself a meeting, had me come back at 2, and he made a determination
[15:19.540 --> 15:26.580]  probable cause. Didn't find any probable cause. We had a pretty good back and forth.
[15:27.860 --> 15:32.660]  It worked out better this time because I had two witnesses with me. I had been reluctant to take
[15:32.660 --> 15:37.140]  witnesses because sometimes they act ignorant, but these guys didn't. They sat back there and
[15:37.140 --> 15:45.780]  kept their mouths shut and the judge kept looking past me at the witnesses and it seemed that because
[15:45.780 --> 15:52.980]  of that he was much more careful. And I kind of stood right square in the middle of him in this
[15:52.980 --> 16:01.940]  hearing and he made a determination that there was no probable cause. And you know, I made an
[16:01.940 --> 16:08.020]  argument about that, that all I have to do is assert that I have reason to believe and do believe
[16:08.020 --> 16:13.620]  and assert enough facts to give a reasonable person cause to believe the crime has been committed
[16:13.620 --> 16:19.220]  and the accused has committed the crime. You have plenty before you. Well, I don't find probable
[16:19.220 --> 16:27.380]  cause in your honor. Am I supposed to give you a complete brief? I would have thought I had to do
[16:27.380 --> 16:35.060]  that later, but right now the accused is not before you. So as I read the Texas Code of Criminal
[16:35.060 --> 16:40.740]  Procedure, you can't hold an examining trial at this time. You first have to get the accused before
[16:40.740 --> 16:48.980]  you. In order to do that, under 15.09, you have to issue a warrant, get him before you. Once you
[16:48.980 --> 16:54.420]  get him before you, then you can hold an examining trial. Well, he decided he didn't find probable
[16:54.420 --> 17:09.460]  cause. So I went to, did I do it yet? I'm going to go to JP8. She refused to issue warrants on
[17:09.460 --> 17:16.340]  my complaint, so I'm going to sue her. But first I'm going to sue JP6 with JP8.
[17:19.700 --> 17:26.500]  I'm going to sue JP8 with another one. There's some more JP's I haven't got to yet.
[17:27.620 --> 17:31.940]  I intend to sue every justice of the peace in the county.
[17:32.660 --> 17:39.620]  They're all going to do the same thing, and I'll sue them all. But I got a present.
[17:41.380 --> 17:51.300]  The same day I was doing this, the first judge that I sued had an answer filed in the court.
[17:52.500 --> 17:57.460]  And they had moved it to JP6, and JP6 had that answer and gave me a copy.
[17:58.420 --> 18:08.820]  And I read it. It was perfect. I sued the judge alleging that the judge failed to perform an
[18:08.820 --> 18:19.060]  administrative duty. And the answer said that the judge had absolute immunity. Well, here's the
[18:19.700 --> 18:27.860]  problem. What keeps you in court is not what you can prove at the end of the day.
[18:29.940 --> 18:38.820]  What keeps you in court is the nature of the claim that you made. And I made a claim that the judge
[18:38.820 --> 18:45.700]  failed to perform an administrative duty over which the judge had no discretion.
[18:45.700 --> 18:53.300]  15.09 says that when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate complete in accordance with 1508,
[18:54.580 --> 19:02.100]  and I'm sorry, forwarded to a magistrate in accordance with 1508, and it is completed
[19:02.100 --> 19:12.100]  according to 1505, the magistrate shall forthwith issue a warrant. Doesn't say anything about
[19:12.180 --> 19:19.380]  probable cause. You can't hold a probable cause hearing in Texas without the accused being there
[19:19.380 --> 19:26.340]  because there's all kind of rights you have to afford the accused. So the first thing you have
[19:26.340 --> 19:33.620]  to do is issue a warrant and get the accused before him. Then he is to advise the accused of
[19:33.620 --> 19:41.060]  his rights, give the accused opportunity to make a statement, and then render that statement to
[19:41.060 --> 19:48.100]  writing, have the accused sign and approve the veracity of the statement. And then the judge
[19:48.100 --> 19:56.340]  can must give the accused opportunity to examine any witnesses against him. And then the judge can
[19:56.340 --> 20:04.180]  must make a determination probable cause and issue a determination under 16.17. The law is real clear
[20:04.180 --> 20:13.460]  on how all this stuff works. Well, I sued this judge, I filed a complaint with this judge,
[20:14.900 --> 20:22.340]  and he did not issue a warrant forthwith, so I sued him because the statute did not give him
[20:23.620 --> 20:30.100]  any administrative capacity, I'm sorry, did not give him any judicial capacity.
[20:31.060 --> 20:37.620]  It dictated what he must do. So they filed a response saying that the judge has
[20:37.620 --> 20:43.460]  absolute immunity for what he does on the bench that's within the scope of his authority.
[20:44.980 --> 20:50.980]  And that's true. But in this case,
[20:54.420 --> 20:59.140]  refusing to issue a warrant was not within the scope of his authority.
[21:00.900 --> 21:07.540]  He was commanded to do a certain thing over which he had no authority and under the Texas
[21:08.180 --> 21:25.140]  Civil Torture and Remedies 104.102, a judge has indemnity from a suit except when he exerts or
[21:25.140 --> 21:43.780]  purports to exert authority he doesn't have. Except when a judge acts in an administrative
[21:43.780 --> 21:50.820]  capacity for which he has no discretion. In that case, he has no indemnity.
[21:51.380 --> 22:00.420]  There's nothing in Texas law that gives him immunity. 104.102 gives him indemnity and the
[22:00.420 --> 22:06.100]  courts have treated that like it's immunity, but it's not. But in this case, he doesn't have it,
[22:06.100 --> 22:16.980]  in any case. But he didn't argue anything else. And this is important to understand. If you get
[22:16.980 --> 22:27.060]  sued and you don't think that the accused has, that the accuser has standing to sue you,
[22:27.060 --> 22:37.540]  you can argue that. But you also have to argue any of his other issues because if that
[22:37.940 --> 22:45.140]  objection gets overruled and you haven't raised an objection to anything else,
[22:46.740 --> 22:56.900]  then you waived it. And they waived it. Oh, wonderful. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[22:56.900 --> 22:59.700]  and we'll be right back.
[23:04.900 --> 23:08.900]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep
[23:08.900 --> 23:13.860]  it safe. But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing
[23:13.860 --> 23:17.860]  your secrets. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[23:26.900 --> 23:32.180]  Your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance
[23:32.180 --> 23:37.940]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[23:37.940 --> 23:43.220]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[23:43.220 --> 23:51.140]  Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Data privacy is a big deal. So nearly every
[23:51.140 --> 23:55.940]  company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information. But what happens if
[23:55.940 --> 24:01.460]  it escapes their control? It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey, a shocking
[24:01.460 --> 24:07.220]  90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[24:07.220 --> 24:12.180]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to Startpage.com. Unlike other search
[24:12.180 --> 24:17.700]  engines, Startpage doesn't store any data on you. They've never been hacked but even if they were,
[24:17.700 --> 24:22.660]  there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare. Too bad other companies
[24:22.660 --> 24:27.860]  don't treat your data the same way. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[24:27.860 --> 24:29.460]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[24:52.660 --> 24:59.300]  I believe there is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[24:59.300 --> 25:04.100]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[25:05.780 --> 25:10.100]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live
[25:10.100 --> 25:13.620]  in an us-against-them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[25:13.620 --> 25:17.780]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[25:17.780 --> 25:21.780]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[25:21.780 --> 25:26.180]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[25:26.180 --> 25:30.580]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie
[25:30.580 --> 25:34.500]  Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[25:34.500 --> 25:38.580]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of
[25:38.580 --> 25:43.220]  law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[25:43.220 --> 25:46.900]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[25:46.900 --> 25:51.460]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[25:51.460 --> 25:55.380]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your
[25:55.380 --> 25:59.300]  rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today,
[25:59.300 --> 26:02.340]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[26:17.060 --> 26:25.540]  Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the line to hand. Won't you follow the law of the land?
[26:27.300 --> 26:34.420]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Greg Felton from the Rule of Law Radio, and we're on this
[26:35.700 --> 26:46.820]  Thursday, the sixth day of November 2025, and I'm talking about suing public officials.
[26:47.220 --> 26:51.380]  It turns out these guys are really putzes.
[26:53.780 --> 26:59.060]  These judges think they're absolutely immune from suit no matter what.
[27:00.740 --> 27:09.380]  So I went in and deliberately set him up, asked the judge to do something that the law
[27:10.180 --> 27:19.780]  specifically commands them to do, and it was something the judge would necessarily find
[27:20.980 --> 27:32.500]  somewhat repugnant or more and more directly intimidating. I asked the judge to issue
[27:32.500 --> 27:37.380]  warrants against the assistant district attorney for the grand jury.
[27:38.180 --> 27:42.740]  When I went to the first judge and I gave him these criminal complaints against his bailiff,
[27:43.620 --> 27:51.300]  he said, Mr. Kelton, in the state of Texas, all complaints are directed to the prosecuting attorney.
[27:53.300 --> 27:56.740]  No, they're not. Nothing directs a complaint to a prosecuting attorney,
[27:57.540 --> 28:03.780]  and I heard that a couple of times from judges. So I went to the second judge and sued the first
[28:03.780 --> 28:09.860]  judge, and he told me the same thing. I gave him the complaints, and he said, Mr. Kelton,
[28:09.860 --> 28:15.700]  what do you want me to do with these? I said, I want you to do exactly what Article 15.09 commands
[28:15.700 --> 28:23.220]  you to do, but before you do anything, you might want to read that suit I just filed against JP3
[28:24.180 --> 28:28.820]  with you before you decide what to do with these complaints.
[28:29.380 --> 28:32.740]  So I come back the next day and the clerk said he sent them to the prosecuting attorney.
[28:34.420 --> 28:42.580]  Well, that was getting to be a problem. So when I went to the next judge, I gave him a criminal
[28:42.580 --> 28:49.940]  complaint against the assistant district attorney and accused the assistant district attorney of
[28:49.940 --> 29:03.540]  sedition. Sedition. Sedition is if someone, I mean, I should have looked that up,
[29:05.220 --> 29:18.100]  if someone does something that is intended to undermine the government, undermine or alter
[29:18.100 --> 29:28.820]  the form of government. Now, the way I read the Constitution, we are guaranteed by the
[29:28.820 --> 29:36.180]  federal Constitution. The federal Constitution under Article 4, Section 4 guarantees to the
[29:36.180 --> 29:45.220]  states a Republican form of government. The only thing I can find that separates a Republican
[29:45.220 --> 29:53.620]  form of government from a democracy is the ability of a citizen to give notice to a grand
[29:53.620 --> 30:03.780]  jury of crime by public officials. That gives the citizen the power to maintain and control
[30:03.780 --> 30:10.180]  the governmental instruments they have created. So I accused the assistant district attorney
[30:11.140 --> 30:18.100]  of secreting criminal complaints against the district attorney from the grand jury
[30:20.180 --> 30:31.140]  and of directing police and magistrates to send all complaints to the prosecuting attorney
[30:32.180 --> 30:37.700]  instead of acting in accordance with the very clear dictates of Texas law.
[30:38.660 --> 30:43.620]  Texas law says that if a policeman arrests someone for any reason, with or without a warrant,
[30:45.620 --> 30:52.900]  they are to take the person directly to the nearest magistrate, not the prosecuting attorney.
[30:53.860 --> 30:58.900]  And the magistrate is to examine into the sufficiency of the allegation, and if he finds
[30:59.140 --> 31:07.780]  probable cause, then he is to issue an order under 16.17. And he goes on to say if an order
[31:07.780 --> 31:20.580]  is not issued within 48 hours, the accused shall be discharged. And in 1730, directs the magistrate
[31:20.580 --> 31:24.980]  to seal all documents had in the hearing, cause his name to be written across the sealing envelope,
[31:24.980 --> 31:30.820]  and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. That is the only place in Texas law
[31:31.780 --> 31:39.220]  where I find anything ordered by statute to be sealed. And that is to preserve the chain of
[31:39.220 --> 31:46.500]  evidence. Well, that doesn't happen. Somebody's arrested, they're taken straight to jail,
[31:47.380 --> 31:54.100]  and this magistrate does this thingy they call a magistration, which is not codified in law
[31:54.100 --> 32:00.420]  anywhere, and they give all the records to the sheriff. They never do get to the
[32:02.180 --> 32:07.700]  clerk of the court of jurisdiction. And they certainly never get to the grand jury,
[32:09.060 --> 32:17.300]  because Article 4 Section 17, I'm sorry, Article 5 Section 17
[32:18.020 --> 32:24.980]  requires that all complaints go to the grand jury. There must be an indictment in all complaints,
[32:24.980 --> 32:32.260]  felonies, and misdemeanors. It specifically stipulates that if the allegation is a misdemeanor,
[32:33.140 --> 32:38.660]  then the clerk shall certify it to the district court, and the district court shall certify it
[32:38.660 --> 32:46.260]  to the court of jurisdiction, to the county court, to the inferior, or to the inferior courts,
[32:47.140 --> 32:54.900]  Justice of the Peace and municipal courts are inferior courts. The Constitution requires
[32:54.900 --> 33:00.820]  an indictment in all criminal prosecutions. It is as clear as day.
[33:03.460 --> 33:08.100]  But the judges are saying, oh, you don't have a right to an indictment in a misdemeanor. I said,
[33:08.100 --> 33:15.780]  where'd you come up with that, guys? That's not what the Constitution says. Well, prosecutors
[33:15.780 --> 33:23.540]  have advised the police and lower courts in practices and procedures that bypass a very
[33:23.540 --> 33:36.740]  large portion of the Texas statute. It literally renders Chapter 16 superfluous. Superfluous.
[33:37.220 --> 33:43.380]  That's a term that comes up in a case called DiRusso v. State.
[33:45.380 --> 33:52.420]  Yeah, DiRusso. Joseph DiRusso v. State. That DiRusso, the one that comes on our show on a
[33:52.420 --> 34:00.900]  regular basis, they came after him, and he was upset at him about the rulings in the case,
[34:00.900 --> 34:08.260]  and I got the rulings in the case. Holy mackerel. That was a seminal case.
[34:10.420 --> 34:19.060]  They said that you cannot interpret one law in such a way that it would render another law
[34:19.060 --> 34:29.220]  superfluous. So the local Justices of the Peace and local courts and prosecutors have interpreted
[34:29.220 --> 34:37.460]  1517 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in such a way that it renders Chapter 16 superfluous
[34:38.020 --> 34:44.340]  and it violates Constitution Article 5, 6, and 17. They hold this
[34:45.060 --> 34:51.380]  Magistration thing, they call it. The judge makes a, he doesn't make a determination for all the
[34:51.380 --> 34:56.740]  cause, he just sets bail, and then instead of sealing all the documents had in the hearing
[34:56.740 --> 35:00.100]  cause of his name to be written across the seat of the envelope before the Court of Jurisdiction,
[35:01.380 --> 35:09.220]  he gives it to the jailer. The jailer gives it to the sheriff, and it never gets to the
[35:09.220 --> 35:15.940]  clerk of the Court of Jurisdiction. I was in Johnson County a few weeks ago. I filed a habeas
[35:15.940 --> 35:25.060]  corpus for David Straight's wife, she's in jail down there, and I'm sitting in the court,
[35:25.060 --> 35:31.700]  the judge is hearing the habeas, and I told the judge, you know, I know this woman's been arrested
[35:31.700 --> 35:35.060]  because she's in jail, she called me from the jail, so she's obviously been arrested.
[35:36.020 --> 35:43.780]  And the prosecutor over here, he knows that she's been arrested, but you, you don't know that she's
[35:43.780 --> 35:53.060]  been arrested because I looked in the public record and there is no evidence in the public record
[35:53.940 --> 36:01.060]  to show that she's been arrested. And since it's not in the public record, it's not before you,
[36:01.780 --> 36:10.020]  and if it's not before you, you can't see it, so it doesn't exist. He ruled against me anyway,
[36:10.020 --> 36:15.860]  so I'm going to go back and take him to the grand jury and let him explain to a grand jury how he's
[36:15.860 --> 36:24.500]  holding someone in jail when they have not followed the clear letter of statutory law.
[36:25.860 --> 36:32.900]  So anyway, that's what I'm working on. So I got this judge that I filed criminal complaints
[36:32.900 --> 36:40.660]  against the district attorney, and the district attorney is not in jail, so he's not before the
[36:40.660 --> 36:44.580]  court so he can't hold an examining trial. He's commanded to issue a warrant,
[36:44.580 --> 36:47.940]  get him before the court so he can hold an examining trial.
[36:49.860 --> 36:54.340]  He refused. I'm kind of like all the others. So I'm suing him. Hang on,
[36:54.340 --> 36:56.900]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[37:03.540 --> 37:08.820]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds of
[37:08.820 --> 37:14.340]  thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be
[37:14.340 --> 37:20.980]  on? Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the
[37:20.980 --> 37:28.740]  claims cost? The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides
[37:28.740 --> 37:36.340]  your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and tele-doc all at zero cost with zero
[37:36.340 --> 37:43.460]  co-pay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes. As an
[37:43.460 --> 37:49.940]  employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes. The CHAMP plan
[37:49.940 --> 37:56.900]  can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit. Call Scott at
[37:56.900 --> 38:08.020]  214-730-2471 or DallasMMS.com. Are you wondering what this world is coming to and why God isn't
[38:08.020 --> 38:14.580]  stopping it? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for
[38:14.580 --> 38:19.540]  Scripture Talk, where Nana and guests study God's Word to find these answers and more.
[38:20.260 --> 38:25.460]  Join us for both verse-by-verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to explain
[38:25.460 --> 38:31.300]  God's plan as well as to provoke unto love and good works. Our first hour studies are in the
[38:31.300 --> 38:37.380]  book of Matthew. Our second hour topics vary each week, exploring sound doctrine as well as Christian
[38:37.380 --> 38:44.340]  character development. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5-16. Let your light so shine before men
[38:44.340 --> 38:50.180]  that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's
[38:50.180 --> 38:55.780]  light and to be a blessing to all those who have a hearing ear. So tune in to Scripture Talk live
[38:55.780 --> 39:02.340]  on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. for an inspiring and motivating study of the
[39:02.340 --> 39:06.340]  Scriptures.
[39:20.500 --> 39:27.300]  Where you gonna look for one? If you could not wait any about too long, would your purpose
[39:27.300 --> 39:34.020]  has been done? Such a symptom and a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling to keep the peace.
[39:34.900 --> 39:41.300]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police, watching the spots
[39:41.860 --> 39:49.060]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Red Fountain, Lulua Radio.
[39:51.060 --> 39:57.780]  Calling line is open. Our calling number is 512-646-1984. If you have a question or
[39:57.780 --> 40:03.140]  comment, give us a call. And if nobody calls in, you're gonna have to put up with me the whole
[40:03.140 --> 40:15.380]  two hours. Okay, the last judge I'm suing, he actually set a hearing or set a meeting with me
[40:15.380 --> 40:19.380]  and I went in to hear, went in and sat down in front of him. And I thought it was just going to
[40:19.380 --> 40:24.340]  be discussed the issue, but he was decided that he was going to hold an examining trial.
[40:24.340 --> 40:38.580]  Well, he examined into my, the sufficiency of my complaint and told me that he had discretion.
[40:39.140 --> 40:50.020]  I told him he didn't. I cited him, cited 15.09, but he cited 106 and said under 106, he had
[40:50.020 --> 41:04.340]  discretion. Well, I didn't have 106 memorized. The lion S.O.B. 106 says, the people shall be
[41:04.340 --> 41:11.380]  secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions from all unreasonable searches,
[41:11.860 --> 41:24.580]  seizures, or, oh, something's wrong. There's something missing. Oh, maybe it's, I'm not seeing
[41:24.580 --> 41:33.460]  all of it. There we go. Okay. Searches, unreasonable searches or, I'm sorry, unreasonable
[41:33.460 --> 41:39.940]  seizures or searches. No warrant to search any place to seize any person or thing shall
[41:39.940 --> 41:46.500]  issue without describing them as nearest may be, nor without probable cause supported by
[41:46.500 --> 41:53.940]  author affirmation. So he used that to say that he had jurisdiction to make a determination,
[41:53.940 --> 42:03.860]  probable cause, but I didn't petition for a search warrant. He screwed it up big time.
[42:03.860 --> 42:14.580]  So I sued him, but he was pretty good. I did have a couple of witnesses with me and frankly,
[42:15.140 --> 42:23.620]  that made a difference. He would have probably been much more difficult had I not had two people
[42:23.620 --> 42:30.180]  out there watching, but he was much more careful and he had this little hearing and I kind of
[42:30.180 --> 42:37.780]  crawled down his throat and worked him over and he wanted to get PO'd. He was, let me know he was
[42:37.780 --> 42:44.900]  an ex-cop and he knew more than I did and I didn't know what I was talking about and refused to issue
[42:44.900 --> 42:55.780]  a warrant. So I sued him anyway. And now, okay, I got that all done. I got all these guys sued
[42:56.420 --> 43:03.620]  and now I got one of them, their time ran out Monday to file an answer and they got the answer
[43:03.620 --> 43:12.420]  filed on the last day. It was an assistant district attorney who filed the answer and anyone who's
[43:12.420 --> 43:19.780]  been listening to the show for a while will recognize the problem with that. The answer
[43:19.860 --> 43:23.540]  could not for my purposes have been any better.
[43:25.860 --> 43:34.660]  The lawyer claimed that the judge had absolute immunity and he claimed two circumstances
[43:35.300 --> 43:39.300]  where a judge has absolute immunity, but he missed one.
[43:41.860 --> 43:46.580]  When a judge is required to perform an administrative function,
[43:47.540 --> 43:55.060]  a function over which the judge has no discretion, that is an administrative function and for that,
[43:55.940 --> 44:04.260]  since it does not require judicial discretion, that is something for which he has no immunity.
[44:05.460 --> 44:12.180]  And the problem they have is, is that the lawyer argued that the judge had absolute immunity.
[44:12.980 --> 44:22.900]  He did not argue anything else, only that the judge had absolute immunity. He did not argue that
[44:22.900 --> 44:30.820]  the judge may have had some discretion as to whether or not to issue the warrant that I asked
[44:30.820 --> 44:39.060]  him to issue. He might have been able to come up with something that mitigated what article 15.09
[44:39.700 --> 44:46.020]  says. 15.09 says that when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate in accordance to 15.08,
[44:46.020 --> 44:55.060]  and it lists the ways you can get it to the magistrate, personal service, fax, email,
[44:55.060 --> 45:00.420]  and several other ways, and it's complete in accordance to 15.05, the magistrate shall
[45:00.980 --> 45:14.980]  issue a warrant. Well, that seems pretty clear. Shall forthwith issue a warrant.
[45:15.780 --> 45:20.980]  That doesn't sound like it gives the magistrate any discretion.
[45:21.620 --> 45:30.740]  So the thing that keeps you in the court, the thing that protects you from a motion to dismiss
[45:30.740 --> 45:36.580]  for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is not what you can prove up at the end of the day.
[45:38.020 --> 45:45.780]  It is the nature of the claim that you make. So if you're filing in the federal court,
[45:46.500 --> 45:56.420]  if you're filing in the federal court, you can expect a 12b6, the 12b1 or 12b6. 12b1 is immunity,
[45:56.420 --> 46:02.980]  12b6 is failure to state a claim. You can always expect a 12b1 and 12b6.
[46:05.620 --> 46:15.620]  In this case, I get past 12b6. He's essentially saying that the court
[46:15.620 --> 46:20.900]  has no jurisdiction because the judge has absolute immunity.
[46:23.300 --> 46:31.380]  Now, it's not whether I can prove up my claims against the judge that keeps me in court.
[46:32.260 --> 46:40.900]  It is the nature of the claim, and my claim is that the judge failed to perform an administrative
[46:40.900 --> 46:46.900]  duty. Now, they may not agree that that's an administrative duty. That's a separate issue.
[46:48.260 --> 46:52.020]  That's something they may be able to prove up as an affirmative defense later.
[46:53.380 --> 46:56.740]  But what keeps you in the court is the nature of the claim.
[46:58.020 --> 47:04.740]  And I claimed under failure to perform an administrative duty, the judge can't
[47:05.060 --> 47:12.260]  render his ruling on whether or not he thinks I can prove up that claim. He must render his ruling
[47:12.260 --> 47:23.860]  based on the nature of the claim. And the claim is no jurisdiction for, no discretion
[47:23.860 --> 47:32.580]  discretion in rendering the ruling. And under the Young Doctrine and under
[47:35.060 --> 47:43.700]  Texas Civil Tort and Remedies 104.102, if the judge fails to perform an administrative duty,
[47:43.700 --> 47:48.900]  then he has no immunity. So this would keep me in court. And the problem is that's all they argued.
[47:49.380 --> 47:56.900]  So if I win that argument, then they have nothing else before the court.
[47:58.500 --> 48:04.340]  So you can't come in and argue one thing, and if you lose that, then come back and argue another.
[48:05.140 --> 48:12.580]  When you file your answer, you have to address everything you're going to raise as an objection
[48:13.540 --> 48:20.660]  to the case. You have to object to every issue. You miss one of them, then you waived your objection.
[48:22.020 --> 48:27.540]  So all they did was said that the judge has absolute immunity.
[48:28.980 --> 48:36.340]  So if they lose that one, then there's nothing else before the court. Gotcha.
[48:36.980 --> 48:45.620]  So, not only that, that's the second issue I will take on. The first issue I will take on
[48:46.740 --> 48:51.220]  is that an assistant district attorney filed the answer.
[48:54.100 --> 49:01.300]  I sued the judge in his personal capacity, alleging that he had no
[49:01.700 --> 49:11.700]  jurisdiction to render this ruling. And what's before the court is the jurisdiction.
[49:13.700 --> 49:19.780]  And in Texas law under Article 5, Section 53 of the Constitution,
[49:20.260 --> 49:32.100]  the government is forbidden to provide a benefit to a public official that's not included in their contract.
[49:34.420 --> 49:42.900]  And legal counsel for a public official sued in their personal capacity is not in their contract.
[49:43.620 --> 49:51.620]  So, before we get to whether or not my allegation of no jurisdiction,
[49:53.300 --> 50:01.700]  before we can get to that, we go to the authority of the lawyer to file the pleading with the court.
[50:02.740 --> 50:11.380]  Since my allegation is that he acted outside of scope, that prevents him from being able to
[50:12.020 --> 50:19.620]  that prevents him from using a public lawyer. So, if I get that one ruled in my favor,
[50:21.220 --> 50:28.260]  then I claim that the prosecutor lacks standing to file this motion with the court and move the
[50:28.260 --> 50:35.780]  court to strike the pleading. If the court strikes the pleading, then the 21-day time limit is up.
[50:36.660 --> 50:41.380]  They don't have a pleading before the court, then I move for default judgment.
[50:44.500 --> 50:47.060]  So, he did it perfectly, gave me exactly what I needed.
[50:48.340 --> 50:54.100]  And they're going to rule against me in the trial court. Yeah, absolutely expected. We don't care
[50:54.100 --> 50:58.740]  about that because your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal. So, you got
[50:58.740 --> 51:06.340]  this judge sitting here and I move to strike his lawyers pleading as improperly filed in violation
[51:06.340 --> 51:14.100]  of the Constitution. And then I move for default judgment because they over the nature of the
[51:14.100 --> 51:21.380]  claim. They're going to rule against me, but he's sitting there thinking, what if the appellate court
[51:21.380 --> 51:28.260]  rules in his favor? Then I have to pay this guy out of my own pocket. But if I make a deal
[51:28.260 --> 51:36.660]  before the appellate court rules, then the state can pay. So, come on guys, make me a deal, write
[51:36.660 --> 51:42.820]  me a check. I'll sell out in a heartbeat. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Willvar Radio,
[51:43.540 --> 51:48.660]  a call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[51:48.660 --> 51:59.620]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because
[51:59.620 --> 52:05.860]  they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the
[52:05.860 --> 52:13.140]  process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First,
[52:13.140 --> 52:19.620]  this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000
[52:19.620 --> 52:25.860]  explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[52:25.860 --> 52:30.900]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[52:31.540 --> 52:36.260]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[52:36.900 --> 52:47.220]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[52:47.220 --> 52:53.540]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[52:54.180 --> 53:02.820]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[53:05.220 --> 53:08.980]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[53:08.980 --> 53:12.660]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[53:12.660 --> 53:16.660]  Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an
[53:16.660 --> 53:19.940]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[53:20.740 --> 53:26.260]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[53:26.260 --> 53:31.060]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[53:31.060 --> 53:37.220]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[53:37.220 --> 53:42.420]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[53:42.420 --> 53:48.420]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[53:48.420 --> 53:54.820]  Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. Think of how the number six is
[53:54.820 --> 54:00.340]  implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666. So it would fit right in that the Seventh Amendment
[54:00.340 --> 54:06.180]  would be about civil trials. Civil seven, civil trials, get it? Civil trials are ones where people
[54:06.180 --> 54:11.060]  sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, like the dividing line between properties.
[54:11.060 --> 54:15.620]  They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs.
[54:15.620 --> 54:20.580]  The Seventh Amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters
[54:20.580 --> 54:22.900]  instead of having a lone judge rule on the case.
[54:23.540 --> 54:27.620]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[54:35.780 --> 54:39.540]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[54:39.540 --> 54:43.220]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[54:43.220 --> 54:47.220]  Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an
[54:47.220 --> 54:50.580]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[54:51.300 --> 54:56.820]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[54:56.820 --> 55:01.620]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[55:01.620 --> 55:06.900]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[55:06.900 --> 55:11.540]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[55:11.540 --> 55:16.980]  Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[55:16.980 --> 55:18.900]  Start over with Startpage.
[55:20.420 --> 55:26.100]  Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel 1984 when Winston is threatened with his worst fear?
[55:26.100 --> 55:30.180]  That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face.
[55:30.180 --> 55:34.260]  But what if his worst fear was spiders? Eight-legged spiders, to be exact.
[55:34.260 --> 55:37.620]  Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual.
[55:37.620 --> 55:41.140]  That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment.
[55:41.540 --> 55:46.340]  Our Founding Fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from creepy
[55:46.340 --> 55:51.140]  crawly eight-legged punishments and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in
[55:51.140 --> 55:55.860]  their day. The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail
[55:55.860 --> 56:02.180]  and charging excessive fines. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[56:11.540 --> 56:33.300]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and we have Dr. Joe on.
[56:33.620 --> 56:43.220]  And I wanted Dr. Joe to come on and talk about silver. He is a silver broker.
[56:45.620 --> 56:51.540]  A whole lot has been happening with silver lately. Dr. Joe, will you kind of give us a
[56:51.540 --> 56:58.660]  rundown on what's going on with silver? Already, I started my interest in career
[56:59.380 --> 57:05.940]  with a box of silver dollars that my mother used to collect. She worked in the
[57:06.500 --> 57:14.260]  cutlery before the war and during the war, and silver dollars were still in common circulation
[57:14.260 --> 57:20.660]  back then. And so she collected them. She had a big box of silver dollars. So I grew up with
[57:21.300 --> 57:28.980]  silver. That was money. And if you look in the Bible, real money is gold and silver,
[57:29.620 --> 57:35.540]  copper also, but mostly silver for common usage. The kings used the gold more.
[57:36.820 --> 57:47.700]  So we had silver in our coinage up until what year, Randy? You remember? 1963. 65. Okay, 65.
[57:47.700 --> 57:59.140]  I was delivering newspapers, and I collected a big bag full of silver coins. And you're right,
[57:59.140 --> 58:05.460]  65 that Nixon took up all the silver. And I've still got this big bag of silver coins sitting
[58:05.460 --> 58:13.780]  up here on the shelf that I've had for, what, 60 years now? And they've done nothing but appreciate
[58:13.780 --> 58:22.340]  in value. They were replaced by what they call cupro nickel slugs that have no
[58:22.900 --> 58:32.580]  real inherent intrinsic value. So silver was money, has been money. And when you look at a dollar,
[58:33.300 --> 58:39.140]  the legal definition of a dollar is so much, so many grains of 99% pure silver.
[58:39.780 --> 58:44.740]  If I remember right, it's 271 grains. That's what Dr. Vieth used to say.
[58:46.340 --> 58:56.180]  If you look at the coinage act of 1792, it provides the death penalty for anybody
[58:56.180 --> 59:04.020]  who would debase the currency. So the comment is, there's no place in the constitution
[59:04.740 --> 59:10.820]  for anything other than the use of gold and silver coins. And here we've got some kind of bank
[59:11.780 --> 59:18.900]  that purports to issue notes, which is really nothing more than a piece of paper with the
[59:19.780 --> 59:29.300]  word dollar written on it. As I understand, those notes were issued for the singular purpose
[59:29.300 --> 59:34.980]  of interbank transfers. They were not intended for legal tender.
[59:36.020 --> 59:45.460]  If you look at the law, they are only for between banks. And I remember reading that law,
[59:46.580 --> 59:51.940]  last year I was doing some research. I had seen it before, but the truth of the matter is the
[59:51.940 --> 01:00:02.100]  United States dollar is so many grains of pure silver. And there are people who keep track of
[01:00:02.100 --> 01:00:08.820]  how many silver dollars are in the possession of the government, how much silver, and how many
[01:00:08.820 --> 01:00:15.300]  paper dollars are out there in circulation. And the last I saw about six weeks ago, there was
[01:00:15.300 --> 01:00:24.180]  1050 some odd paper dollars in circulation for every one dollar of real silver in the treasury.
[01:00:26.100 --> 01:00:27.220]  So what does that tell you?
[01:00:29.540 --> 01:00:36.260]  It reflects the actual value of silver. And but all through the years, I've been told forever that
[01:00:36.260 --> 01:00:44.180]  silver is absolutely the greatest investment. But the price of silver has been artificially
[01:00:45.460 --> 01:00:51.780]  dampened. Because as I understand, there has never been a currency based on gold,
[01:00:52.900 --> 01:00:58.260]  that the only all currencies were always based on silver. They weren't based on gold because
[01:00:58.260 --> 01:01:03.140]  it wasn't enough of it. You couldn't make enough coins to spread them around to be useful.
[01:01:03.700 --> 01:01:08.180]  So there was a lot more silver. So they based all the currencies on silver.
[01:01:08.180 --> 01:01:18.020]  Here's a question for you. How many households do you know that have a little bag of silver coins
[01:01:18.020 --> 01:01:27.700]  in case of an emergency? Only one that I know of, or two, I guess. Well, I know a few. Scott,
[01:01:27.700 --> 01:01:36.100]  he's got some, you've got some, and I've got some. It's become what was common. And everybody had
[01:01:36.100 --> 01:01:44.020]  silver, which was the money was valuable in and of itself. When you paid in a piece of silver coin,
[01:01:44.020 --> 01:01:49.460]  the debt was paid and that was the end of it. And the economy was very much more stable
[01:01:50.340 --> 01:01:58.100]  back in those days. Now, unemployment, inflation up down sideways. I have never seen,
[01:01:58.100 --> 01:02:03.060]  and nor has there been, to the best of my knowledge, in the history of the world,
[01:02:03.060 --> 01:02:10.500]  a situation where an entire nation doesn't have money. We've got paper notes,
[01:02:11.220 --> 01:02:19.540]  we've got copper slugs, but we do not have anything of the traditional historical value
[01:02:19.540 --> 01:02:25.300]  called silver, not to any significant degree. And the problem with silver,
[01:02:25.700 --> 01:02:33.940]  for centuries, silver was just silver. And it was used in a few places. It was used for silver leaf
[01:02:34.740 --> 01:02:42.420]  and plating, but there wasn't a great use for silver. But as of late in the last
[01:02:43.860 --> 01:02:53.460]  few decades, silver is extensively used in electronic circuits. And as I understand,
[01:02:53.540 --> 01:03:00.580]  we have already well mined out all the silver reserves on the planet.
[01:03:02.420 --> 01:03:11.620]  We're running out of silver. And the electronics arena needs way more silver than it's got.
[01:03:12.420 --> 01:03:18.820]  But silver was the basis for currency. So the government has artificially
[01:03:19.380 --> 01:03:25.460]  restricted the value of silver because they didn't want it to go up because they didn't want
[01:03:25.460 --> 01:03:35.540]  their currency to inflate. But as I understand, recently, silver has really began to appreciate.
[01:03:36.660 --> 01:03:43.540]  It was like $19 to $20 for 40 years. What is it now, spot price?
[01:03:44.500 --> 01:03:46.980]  It's 47 last time I checked.
[01:03:50.020 --> 01:03:55.380]  That's saying that these governments are unable to control the price of silver. It's getting out of
[01:03:55.380 --> 01:04:02.500]  their control because it's becoming so valuable. I'm hearing that before long, silver will be more
[01:04:02.500 --> 01:04:11.220]  valuable than gold. Oh, I've heard that. It's wearer than gold. Here's a dynamic for you that
[01:04:11.220 --> 01:04:23.060]  most people don't understand. If you have a $5,000 computer and it's got 20 cents worth of silver in
[01:04:23.060 --> 01:04:34.980]  it, which is not much, how deleterious will it be on a $5,000 sale if 20 cents of silver goes to 40
[01:04:34.980 --> 01:04:44.580]  cents of silver? So the price of silver could double easily and industrial demand would not
[01:04:44.580 --> 01:04:55.540]  be dented in the slightest. That's good for the price of silver. That makes sense? Yes.
[01:04:55.940 --> 01:05:04.900]  One of the uses of silver is silver nitride, antibiotic colloidal silver. They put a tiny,
[01:05:04.900 --> 01:05:12.020]  tiny, tiny, tiny bit of silver in surgical bandages and it prevents infections.
[01:05:12.020 --> 01:05:19.700]  Silver kills everything.
[01:05:21.140 --> 01:05:27.700]  Yeah. If the price of silver doubles, will that decrease the usage of silver in
[01:05:28.660 --> 01:05:34.820]  tiny, tiny, tiny amounts in bandages? No.
[01:05:34.820 --> 01:05:43.060]  No. So the industrial uses of silver are enormous. They're more and more all the time.
[01:05:43.780 --> 01:05:48.500]  The supply is limited. The price has been suppressed. What's it look like to you?
[01:05:49.700 --> 01:05:58.500]  The demand for silver is far outstripping the supply and we have really well mined out all
[01:05:58.500 --> 01:06:04.660]  the silver. There's some around, but very little amount. It's all been mined out. We're running out
[01:06:04.660 --> 01:06:10.100]  of silver. We're not running out of gold. There's plenty. Right. Running out of silver. For your
[01:06:10.100 --> 01:06:14.980]  financial safety, for your family's financial safety, what's a good idea?
[01:06:17.940 --> 01:06:28.260]  Silver's like, it's absolute. I knew some people who used to buy equipment. When the economy
[01:06:28.340 --> 01:06:35.060]  got down and companies were going out of business, they would go in and buy up their equipment and
[01:06:35.060 --> 01:06:44.020]  this guy would put it in a warehouse because it's hard. It doesn't evaporate. It stays what it is
[01:06:44.020 --> 01:06:50.820]  and then when the economy comes back up, then this equipment becomes very valuable. Silver, gold,
[01:06:50.820 --> 01:06:59.460]  silver, lead, something that's hard is something you want as a hedge against inflation.
[01:07:00.500 --> 01:07:07.940]  Right now, as I understand, silver is not like gold as a hedge against inflation. Silver, not so much.
[01:07:08.500 --> 01:07:15.620]  Silver is more speculative now. You buy silver, it's going up. It ain't coming down.
[01:07:15.620 --> 01:07:24.180]  The supply of silver is running out and the industrial uses for silver is increasing. It's
[01:07:24.180 --> 01:07:32.580]  going to do nothing but go up. It's an industrial metal at a time when industrial demand is going
[01:07:33.700 --> 01:07:42.500]  straight up. For 40 years, silver was around 20 bucks, 19, 20, 21. Then it would back down and
[01:07:42.500 --> 01:07:50.260]  back up and boom, here recently it's doubled. From what I hear, that's just going to keep happening.
[01:07:52.260 --> 01:07:59.220]  Now, the good news is you don't have to have $100,000 to invest in silver.
[01:08:01.140 --> 01:08:10.660]  You can start off with $20. $100 would be better. $500 would be great. $1,000 would be excellent,
[01:08:11.220 --> 01:08:18.500]  but you don't have to be a millionaire several times over to get into to silver.
[01:08:25.300 --> 01:08:31.380]  Are you still there? Say that again? Okay, I thought I lost you. I bumped my mic and then you
[01:08:32.180 --> 01:08:37.300]  dropped out. Silver, unlike gold, gold's like what, $1,000 an ounce now?
[01:08:38.260 --> 01:08:45.860]  No, it's $4,000 an ounce. That's hard to get into, but silver's not. But silver,
[01:08:46.900 --> 01:08:56.820]  because its industrial use is much greater than gold, it's likely the predictions I've heard is
[01:08:56.820 --> 01:09:04.740]  it's going to wind up more expensive than gold. There's another metal that went through something
[01:09:04.740 --> 01:09:11.540]  similar. The Washington Monument, the point on the top of the Washington Monument,
[01:09:12.980 --> 01:09:20.020]  when the Washington Monument was built, that point was made out of the most expensive metal on the
[01:09:20.020 --> 01:09:28.580]  planet, aluminum. It was the most expensive metal on the planet at the time, but then they figured
[01:09:28.580 --> 01:09:37.780]  out how to extract aluminum from bauxite, and aluminum got cheap. Silver's doing exactly the
[01:09:37.780 --> 01:09:40.980]  opposite.
[01:09:40.980 --> 01:10:07.300]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[01:10:07.380 --> 01:10:12.740]  and a better understanding of his word? Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays
[01:10:12.740 --> 01:10:17.860]  from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the
[01:10:17.860 --> 01:10:23.540]  scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15. Study to show thyself approved unto God,
[01:10:23.540 --> 01:10:27.460]  a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[01:10:28.180 --> 01:10:32.820]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by
[01:10:33.140 --> 01:10:38.660]  and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with
[01:10:38.660 --> 01:10:44.020]  discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's
[01:10:44.020 --> 01:10:48.980]  light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith
[01:10:48.980 --> 01:10:54.500]  and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to
[01:10:54.500 --> 01:11:00.500]  scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[01:11:00.500 --> 01:11:07.620]  motivate your studies of the scriptures. Through advances in technology our lives have greatly
[01:11:07.620 --> 01:11:13.380]  improved except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[01:11:13.380 --> 01:11:19.220]  and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[01:11:19.220 --> 01:11:24.420]  environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[01:11:24.500 --> 01:11:30.580]  adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio
[01:11:30.580 --> 01:11:36.260]  Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come
[01:11:36.260 --> 01:11:42.980]  to trust Young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[01:11:42.980 --> 01:11:49.220]  and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com your health will improve as
[01:11:49.220 --> 01:11:55.380]  you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity you may want to join
[01:11:55.380 --> 01:12:01.860]  us. As a distributor you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase
[01:12:01.860 --> 01:12:24.500]  your income. Order now. This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:12:24.500 --> 01:12:36.260]  Okay, we are back, Randy Felton, Brett Felton. We're going to radio and talk to Dr. Joe
[01:12:37.220 --> 01:12:46.180]  about silver. Now, Dr. Joe, you are a silver broker. I have access to more silver than you
[01:12:46.180 --> 01:12:55.860]  could possibly buy. Yep. Okay, what's the best way to purchase silver? Well, if we have a couple
[01:12:55.860 --> 01:13:06.660]  minutes, I'd like to make a few more comments. Do we have a minute? Yes. This is a sleeping giant.
[01:13:06.660 --> 01:13:12.260]  I mean, this is a sleeping giant and at the other side of it there's a tremendous danger.
[01:13:13.060 --> 01:13:19.780]  You look throughout the world in the United States, there's no money. People do not have
[01:13:19.780 --> 01:13:27.140]  in their pocket a silver quarter, a silver dime, a silver anything. They don't have any real value.
[01:13:28.420 --> 01:13:36.420]  That is extraordinarily dangerous. If anything goes wrong on a big scale, people have no way
[01:13:36.420 --> 01:13:43.860]  of making a simple exchange. Historically, that's never happened and I view it as a
[01:13:43.860 --> 01:13:50.340]  tremendous danger. You probably know the way the Chinese write. They write in characters.
[01:13:51.380 --> 01:13:58.180]  If they write a character for danger, it can also be interpreted as opportunity.
[01:13:58.180 --> 01:14:03.940]  I believe that silver is the biggest sleeping giant that ever has been and I'm compelled by
[01:14:03.940 --> 01:14:09.780]  the danger to recommend it to people and I'm compelled by the enormous opportunity
[01:14:09.780 --> 01:14:18.820]  to recommend it to people. A third thing is you can hold your silver, physical silver,
[01:14:18.820 --> 01:14:24.660]  in a little box under your bed, under your mattress, in the closet, under in the cellar
[01:14:25.220 --> 01:14:30.500]  and it's yours. Nobody can get it. You don't have to go to the bank. You don't have to use
[01:14:30.500 --> 01:14:37.540]  the electronic teller. It's yours in your hand, in your possession. That's a tremendous advantage.
[01:14:39.140 --> 01:14:47.060]  You've got a triple whammy here. It is geopolitically a bad thing to not have silver
[01:14:47.060 --> 01:14:54.260]  and a good thing to have silver and also it's under your control in your hand and
[01:14:54.740 --> 01:15:01.860]  its value is about to double and double again easily. So that's the urgency
[01:15:03.060 --> 01:15:08.180]  of getting some of this investment. It's more than an investment. It's your safety,
[01:15:08.180 --> 01:15:14.020]  it's your family's safety, it's your children's safety and it's your investment future.
[01:15:15.540 --> 01:15:20.100]  So if someone wants to purchase silver, how do they purchase that through you?
[01:15:20.100 --> 01:15:29.540]  Well, they give me a call and they say, Randy Kelton said, give me a, help me buy some silver.
[01:15:30.900 --> 01:15:36.340]  So if somebody says that Randy Kelton recommended them, are you going to charge them double?
[01:15:38.100 --> 01:15:47.460]  I, you know, I'm keeping quiet about that, but we will do the market spot price in a small
[01:15:47.460 --> 01:15:53.700]  percentage for handling fees and we'll make a donation to the Randy Kelton rule of law radio.
[01:15:54.740 --> 01:15:57.860]  No, no, no, no. Make it to the Randy Kelton's beer fund.
[01:15:59.380 --> 01:16:01.220]  Oh, the beer fund?
[01:16:01.220 --> 01:16:06.340]  Yeah, the beer fund has not gotten near enough exposure lately.
[01:16:07.700 --> 01:16:11.780]  Oh, you talk about a geopolitical tragedy. There you go.
[01:16:11.780 --> 01:16:21.060]  Yeah. So if they just contact me, I will get them to Dr. Joe, if you want to get silver.
[01:16:23.220 --> 01:16:28.180]  I have been hearing, you know, everybody's been saying buy silver, buy silver for the last
[01:16:29.380 --> 01:16:36.420]  20 years that I've been on radio. And silver hovered around 19 or 20 dollars all this time.
[01:16:36.420 --> 01:16:41.940]  And I'm saying to everybody, well, what's the deal here? Silver is supposed to be this
[01:16:42.580 --> 01:16:53.700]  great investment. And then what about two months ago? Boom. The governments, because their
[01:16:53.700 --> 01:16:59.780]  currencies were based on silver, have been holding down the price of silver.
[01:17:00.580 --> 01:17:07.380]  And a couple of months ago, they lost control of it. Now it's going up and seeking its true market
[01:17:07.380 --> 01:17:14.260]  value. If anybody donates to my beer fund, I'll buy silver with it.
[01:17:17.620 --> 01:17:18.740]  Just kidding. Just kidding.
[01:17:18.740 --> 01:17:24.820]  Silver has gone from 25, 30 dollars an ounce in the last few months up to, it hit 50 dollars the
[01:17:24.820 --> 01:17:28.340]  other day. Now it's back down a little bit. It's a good time to buy.
[01:17:30.740 --> 01:17:36.660]  Okay. So anybody interested in silver, let me know and I'll get you to Dr. Joe.
[01:17:37.620 --> 01:17:43.620]  We do have another caller. Eric in Massachusetts.
[01:17:46.580 --> 01:17:49.140]  Eric, what do you have for us today?
[01:17:50.660 --> 01:17:57.380]  Well, I'll make a few comments about silver and gold. Supposedly silver and gold have a
[01:17:57.460 --> 01:18:06.980]  ratio, a natural ratio. So when you're mining gold, oftentimes you're getting silver also.
[01:18:08.740 --> 01:18:15.540]  Well, gold is a hedge. Gold will preserve the value of your money.
[01:18:16.980 --> 01:18:17.780]  Silver is unique.
[01:18:17.780 --> 01:18:23.860]  I'm talking about mining, Randy. So when you're mining gold, oftentimes
[01:18:24.420 --> 01:18:26.660]  you're mining silver at the same time.
[01:18:26.660 --> 01:18:33.220]  Yeah. The biggest silver mine ever was in Colorado. And the way they found it is they're
[01:18:33.220 --> 01:18:38.900]  mining gold and they're pulling out all these tailings and these, they've got these big piles
[01:18:38.900 --> 01:18:48.420]  of tailings that are black, almost black. They're kind of bluish black. And a expert come by to look
[01:18:48.420 --> 01:18:52.980]  at the mines one day and he says, what are you doing with all this silver ore? They didn't know
[01:18:52.980 --> 01:19:00.420]  what it was. I forget the name of it. It was the one Molly Brown, the one from the Titanic.
[01:19:00.980 --> 01:19:07.300]  It's the one she owned. It was the biggest silver mine ever in history. And it started out as a gold
[01:19:07.300 --> 01:19:12.980]  mine. They were pulling out the silver ore and didn't know what it was. So they had piles of
[01:19:12.980 --> 01:19:18.980]  silver ore and it's black, almost blue ore. It turned out it was silver.
[01:19:22.500 --> 01:19:23.940]  Did you hear about that, Eric?
[01:19:25.380 --> 01:19:28.900]  I did not hear about that. I did not hear about that.
[01:19:29.940 --> 01:19:31.700]  That was one of those crazy things.
[01:19:33.460 --> 01:19:41.780]  I did. I was following the advice of Dr. Joe and I did have silver coins for many years.
[01:19:42.980 --> 01:19:47.300]  But unfortunately, I had to sell them recently because of my nasty tenant,
[01:19:48.980 --> 01:19:51.540]  really the nasty judge is really what it was.
[01:19:54.580 --> 01:20:03.620]  And gold too, I had to sell them gold and silver, which hurt because they're about double price now.
[01:20:05.300 --> 01:20:08.260]  Then you probably sold it just before the price went up.
[01:20:09.220 --> 01:20:13.540]  I did, yeah. Gold was starting to move up. So I bought the gold at maybe
[01:20:14.420 --> 01:20:20.980]  $1,600 to $1,800 and I sold it for maybe $2,500. Whereas now it's like Dr. Joe just said, it's
[01:20:20.980 --> 01:20:31.460]  about $5,000. And the silver, I don't remember what I bought it at, but I sold it maybe around
[01:20:31.460 --> 01:20:41.860]  $25 an ounce. But I had, what I mostly had was, I had, maybe it was closer to 30, but I sold,
[01:20:41.860 --> 01:20:48.340]  I had what is called coins, what are those coins called? Were they 90% silver?
[01:20:48.340 --> 01:20:49.540]  Rounds, silver rounds?
[01:20:50.500 --> 01:20:56.260]  No, no, where it's 90% silver, like the pre-1964 dimes and quarters.
[01:20:58.500 --> 01:20:59.700]  Yeah, I've got a lot of those.
[01:21:00.660 --> 01:21:07.060]  Yeah. So those are good to have because you can kind of use those and say, well, here,
[01:21:07.060 --> 01:21:15.620]  this is worth this much. But here's what I'm calling about. On Thursdays, maybe we should
[01:21:15.620 --> 01:21:22.340]  do an educational class, or you should do an educational class, pick a topic that people
[01:21:22.420 --> 01:21:29.220]  want to hear about and do, you know, two hours or two hours and call-ins on a specific topic.
[01:21:30.740 --> 01:21:35.060]  That might be interesting. And then you build a good library.
[01:21:36.020 --> 01:21:44.660]  Well, I have my Legal 101 book, and I've been wanting to do that on the air
[01:21:45.140 --> 01:21:54.180]  to get it in segments, you know, 15-minute segments. I've got a lot of stuff there,
[01:21:54.180 --> 01:21:58.260]  and there's a lot of stuff in there that I haven't went over in quite a while.
[01:22:00.340 --> 01:22:06.020]  Over the years, I've developed a whole bunch of rules on, and like one of the rules I talk
[01:22:06.020 --> 01:22:09.220]  about a lot is never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[01:22:10.180 --> 01:22:13.700]  I've got a number of rules like that that are very powerful.
[01:22:14.420 --> 01:22:17.700]  You never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do,
[01:22:19.140 --> 01:22:23.460]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law doesn't compel them to do.
[01:22:24.020 --> 01:22:27.860]  So when they don't do it, you can hammer them. That's what I'm talking about at the beginning
[01:22:27.860 --> 01:22:33.220]  of this show. I'm asking public officials to do something that the law compels them to do.
[01:22:33.220 --> 01:22:35.300]  When they don't do it, then I'm going to sue them.
[01:23:03.460 --> 01:23:10.340]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:23:10.340 --> 01:23:14.980]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[01:23:14.980 --> 01:23:16.580]  back with details in a moment.
[01:23:17.380 --> 01:23:22.900]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:23:22.900 --> 01:23:27.380]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:23:27.620 --> 01:23:32.340]  You'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights,
[01:23:32.340 --> 01:23:38.580]  say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:23:38.580 --> 01:23:44.340]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:23:44.340 --> 01:23:47.620]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:23:49.460 --> 01:23:54.980]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? If so, you might think that multitasking
[01:23:54.980 --> 01:23:59.780]  improves your smart. But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:23:59.780 --> 01:24:04.340]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:24:04.340 --> 01:24:07.540]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:24:07.540 --> 01:24:12.580]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter
[01:24:12.580 --> 01:24:17.700]  in their prefrontal cortex. That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas
[01:24:17.700 --> 01:24:24.740]  and regulate our emotions. So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as attack.
[01:24:24.980 --> 01:24:29.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:24:34.820 --> 01:24:40.260]  This is building seven, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:24:40.260 --> 01:24:45.780]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:24:45.780 --> 01:24:50.340]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:24:50.340 --> 01:24:54.260]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:24:54.260 --> 01:24:56.660]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:24:56.660 --> 01:24:59.220]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:24:59.220 --> 01:25:04.660]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to rememberbuildingseven.org today.
[01:25:06.420 --> 01:25:10.420]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[01:25:10.420 --> 01:25:14.260]  we live in an us against them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:25:14.260 --> 01:25:18.420]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[01:25:18.420 --> 01:25:22.420]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[01:25:22.420 --> 01:25:26.820]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[01:25:26.820 --> 01:25:31.220]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie
[01:25:31.220 --> 01:25:35.140]  Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[01:25:35.140 --> 01:25:39.220]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of
[01:25:39.220 --> 01:25:43.860]  law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:25:43.860 --> 01:25:47.540]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[01:25:47.540 --> 01:25:52.100]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:25:52.100 --> 01:25:56.020]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your
[01:25:56.020 --> 01:26:00.100]  rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and
[01:26:00.100 --> 01:26:08.180]  together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. You are listening to the Logos Radio
[01:26:08.180 --> 01:26:10.820]  Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:26:27.220 --> 01:26:33.940]  Okay, we are back with Randy Kelton from Rule of Law Radio. We're talking to Eric in Massachusetts.
[01:26:34.660 --> 01:26:44.020]  And 12, 12B. That's what I'm, right now what I'm suing, I'm suing in the state court.
[01:26:45.380 --> 01:26:51.060]  But I'm suing in the state court to get the state actors to screw everything up
[01:26:52.020 --> 01:26:56.660]  so that I can go to the federal court. And when I get to the federal court,
[01:26:56.660 --> 01:27:03.540]  there always the first thing you're going to get is 12B, especially if you're suing public officials.
[01:27:04.900 --> 01:27:17.540]  So we have to set them up so that when we get there, we have at least one claim that bypasses 12B1.
[01:27:20.900 --> 01:27:28.820]  12B1 goes to immunity. So we have to ask the public official to do something that the law
[01:27:28.980 --> 01:27:34.020]  specifically commands them to do over which they have no discretion.
[01:27:36.500 --> 01:27:45.940]  And that gets you by 12B1. And then 12B6, you just have to actually state a claim and you can use,
[01:27:46.820 --> 01:27:58.020]  like I use O'Connor's litigation guides and it lists all of the claims and causes of actions
[01:27:58.020 --> 01:28:05.140]  and court claims. And you just have to make sure you make your allegations in accordance with the
[01:28:05.140 --> 01:28:12.260]  elements. You must allege each element in order to be a 12B6.
[01:28:17.300 --> 01:28:22.820]  Well, you know, what's interesting is they will always
[01:28:23.540 --> 01:28:31.380]  basically make the statement, you know, you didn't make a claim. So you could lay out the most
[01:28:31.380 --> 01:28:39.380]  beautiful thing, all the elements and those darn lawyers are always going to say they're
[01:28:39.380 --> 01:28:44.580]  failure to state a claim. And it's really annoying and it's really off-putting.
[01:28:45.220 --> 01:28:51.140]  And that's where you need to do a motion for sanctions and bar briefs is not out of.
[01:28:53.700 --> 01:29:01.700]  If they file a frivolous pleading where you've obviously stated a claim and they
[01:29:02.500 --> 01:29:07.700]  allege that you failed to state a claim, first thing I want to do is move for sanctions
[01:29:08.660 --> 01:29:14.820]  and then go to the state bar's standards and bar brief the snot out of them.
[01:29:16.660 --> 01:29:18.260]  Lawyers are low hanging fruit.
[01:29:18.900 --> 01:29:27.300]  It's funny you should say that. I'm dealing with this right now. So literally the bar organization
[01:29:28.180 --> 01:29:34.740]  called me today and I've spoken to the guy before and I just sent something in last week
[01:29:36.100 --> 01:29:43.300]  where I, you know, said, hey, this attorney's not speaking with candor to the court. And,
[01:29:43.300 --> 01:29:48.820]  you know, he did this and this and this. So the guy will call me and say, well, you know, Mr.
[01:29:48.820 --> 01:29:55.860]  Porter, you really can't file these unless you get the judge to, you know, make some, you know,
[01:29:55.860 --> 01:30:00.100]  you have to ask for a sanction or get some agreement from the judge. We can't really
[01:30:00.100 --> 01:30:06.500]  do anything with this. And, you know, so I explained it, you know, and he's like, all right,
[01:30:06.500 --> 01:30:16.580]  well, we'll, you know, we'll make a check mark on him. But the next one, so I had the conversation
[01:30:16.580 --> 01:30:23.300]  with him today and the next one, I realized I actually have something from the judge for them.
[01:30:23.300 --> 01:30:31.220]  But the next time I filed, so I had originally filed in the case, this is a federal case,
[01:30:31.220 --> 01:30:37.300]  where he didn't remove the case properly. He was making statements on behalf of the
[01:30:38.660 --> 01:30:44.500]  defendant. So violation of rule 602. And then he didn't make an appearance.
[01:30:46.180 --> 01:30:53.060]  So my next filing, I can say he's making a claim on behalf of the defendant or on behalf of the
[01:30:53.060 --> 01:31:02.740]  defendant. And he, he didn't make an appearance. And here's where the judge acknowledged it and
[01:31:02.740 --> 01:31:10.500]  said, well, he corrected it too late. He violated it. So that's what they're looking for. They're
[01:31:10.500 --> 01:31:15.540]  looking for me because you're never going to get a judge to sanction an attorney.
[01:31:16.420 --> 01:31:21.380]  We don't care about that. You're never going to get the bar to sanction one of their attorneys.
[01:31:21.380 --> 01:31:25.380]  They're just there as a public relations agency for the lawyers.
[01:31:26.660 --> 01:31:32.740]  That's not where the power of a bar grievance is. They have to notice their insurance carrier.
[01:31:34.180 --> 01:31:39.620]  That's where the power is. Now, insurance carrier, he don't care if it's valid or not.
[01:31:41.220 --> 01:31:47.700]  That's an excuse for him so he can raise the premiums. So he's going to be jumping up and
[01:31:47.700 --> 01:31:57.620]  down, clapping his hands. Oh, goody goody. Understood. So in this same case,
[01:32:02.020 --> 01:32:08.740]  I made a motion. So it was removed. It wasn't removed properly in my opinion.
[01:32:09.380 --> 01:32:15.860]  I had actually made a call maybe about this time last year to you. And so I filed a motion to
[01:32:15.860 --> 01:32:21.460]  dismiss the removal, which isn't proper in a federal court. But what else are you going to do?
[01:32:22.660 --> 01:32:24.660]  Actually, you would file a motion to remand.
[01:32:26.260 --> 01:32:34.340]  Understood. But I didn't want to lose my sort of opportunity to remand. And really, what was it?
[01:32:34.340 --> 01:32:44.420]  It was an improper filing. I shouldn't have to waste a remand on that. But the judge actually
[01:32:45.300 --> 01:32:53.220]  took it as a remand. So I said, hey, this is a deficient pleading, a deficient removal.
[01:32:53.220 --> 01:32:58.900]  It should be dismissed. And that, I think, is valid. That's a valid claim. It wasn't removed
[01:32:58.900 --> 01:33:06.580]  properly. This should be dismissed. I think that's valid. I'm not arguing international shoe.
[01:33:06.580 --> 01:33:14.340]  I'm not arguing other case law regarding remand. It wasn't removed properly. So the judge took it
[01:33:14.340 --> 01:33:22.580]  as a remand. So then when I go to file a proper remand, international shoe and all the other
[01:33:22.580 --> 01:33:30.500]  proper cases, the judge says, and it's funny because I wrote in there something was sanctionable.
[01:33:31.060 --> 01:33:40.340]  Well, the attorney did this. He removed it. And that's sanctionable. I file it. The next day,
[01:33:40.420 --> 01:33:48.580]  the judge makes a ruling and starts to threaten to sanction me because I'm relitigating the remand.
[01:33:49.620 --> 01:33:56.340]  And that was farthest from the truth because all I said was my filing was a motion to dismiss
[01:33:56.340 --> 01:34:05.460]  for deficiencies. And the judge is accusing me of relitigating the remand. But what is a remand?
[01:34:05.540 --> 01:34:13.220]  Is a remand. A remand is a jurisdictional issue. I can argue that every single day I want because
[01:34:13.220 --> 01:34:18.420]  that's not waivable. Obviously, if you do it excessively, they're going to be upset with you,
[01:34:18.420 --> 01:34:27.700]  aren't they? But the judge is trying to threaten me, sanction me, for arguing something that's not
[01:34:27.700 --> 01:34:32.580]  waivable. How crazy is that? And the federal court too.
[01:34:33.780 --> 01:34:36.580]  That should get a judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[01:34:38.100 --> 01:34:45.380]  It will after she denies me my motion to recuse.
[01:34:48.260 --> 01:34:55.380]  And obviously a motion to recuse is an extremely high bar, but because I didn't think about this
[01:34:55.380 --> 01:35:05.700]  stuff and we all discussed these things, I'm going to play it as, hey, we pro se litigants
[01:35:06.660 --> 01:35:14.100]  get abused by these attorneys. And now the attorney is playing into this threat of sanctioning.
[01:35:14.100 --> 01:35:19.620]  And every time he's filing now, he's like, well, we should sanction him. And he's frivolous and
[01:35:19.620 --> 01:35:25.460]  vexatious. So now she's opened the floodgates. The judge has opened the floodgates for the attorney
[01:35:25.460 --> 01:35:33.220]  to start slamming me, threatening me with sanctions, frivolous, vexatious, all of these slurs.
[01:35:34.260 --> 01:35:40.340]  Again, for what? For something that's jurisdiction, that's not waivable, that can be brought up five
[01:35:40.340 --> 01:35:49.140]  minutes before the final decision. That jurisdiction can be brought up right before the order.
[01:35:49.780 --> 01:35:52.820]  Did you file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge?
[01:35:54.420 --> 01:35:58.020]  Understood. But what I'm going to do is I didn't get to finish sort of what I was saying.
[01:35:58.020 --> 01:36:05.380]  What I'm going to do is I'm going to write up a, and I've already started a motion to
[01:36:05.380 --> 01:36:11.460]  recuse the judge and say, look, here's the abuse you've opened up. You've created this animus
[01:36:12.260 --> 01:36:18.900]  against me as a pro se litigant. You've threatened to sanction me twice now.
[01:36:19.860 --> 01:36:26.900]  And then because of that, the attorney is accusing me of frivolous, vexatious,
[01:36:26.900 --> 01:36:36.260]  whatever. And I have in the state court where the appeals court recognized that I had suffered
[01:36:36.260 --> 01:36:44.820]  eight years of an attorney doing this to me, and they chided in court during oral arguments
[01:36:45.300 --> 01:36:48.100]  the attorney for doing that yet again.
[01:36:51.140 --> 01:36:54.900]  That sounds like a good grounds to do judicial conduct complaint to judge.
[01:36:54.900 --> 01:36:58.580]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, River by Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:37:03.620 --> 01:37:08.740]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds
[01:37:08.740 --> 01:37:13.940]  of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford
[01:37:13.940 --> 01:37:20.100]  to be on? Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[01:37:20.100 --> 01:37:27.780]  by lowering the claims cost? The champ plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[01:37:27.780 --> 01:37:34.500]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all
[01:37:34.500 --> 01:37:41.140]  at zero cost with zero copay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by
[01:37:41.140 --> 01:37:47.220]  paying less than FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars
[01:37:47.220 --> 01:37:53.780]  and matching FICA taxes. The champ plan can help add working capital, market resale value,
[01:37:53.780 --> 01:38:03.540]  or pay down lines of credit. Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[01:38:04.740 --> 01:38:07.220]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:38:07.860 --> 01:38:13.380]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand
[01:38:13.380 --> 01:38:20.660]  four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:38:20.660 --> 01:38:25.380]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do
[01:38:25.380 --> 01:38:32.580]  for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Juris Dictionary
[01:38:32.580 --> 01:38:39.220]  was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[01:38:39.220 --> 01:38:44.740]  a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:38:44.740 --> 01:38:51.620]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:38:51.620 --> 01:38:58.820]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:38:58.820 --> 01:39:05.060]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:39:28.820 --> 01:39:33.860]  I will never understand some things I realize fully
[01:39:35.300 --> 01:39:41.940]  Somebody's gonna police a policeman Somebody's gonna police a bully
[01:39:43.780 --> 01:39:51.140]  There's always a room at the top of the hill I hear through the grave mine and it's lonely
[01:39:51.540 --> 01:39:55.940]  Still they're wishing it was more than our position to build
[01:39:56.660 --> 01:40:00.500]  They know that if they don't do it, somebody will
[01:40:04.820 --> 01:40:08.660]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio,
[01:40:09.300 --> 01:40:19.620]  and we're talking to Eric in Massachusetts. Okay, so the judge has opened the door
[01:40:20.580 --> 01:40:26.180]  for the prosecutor to harass you with motions for sanctions.
[01:40:28.820 --> 01:40:32.180]  Oh, hold on. Let me unmute you. There we go.
[01:40:33.380 --> 01:40:36.100]  Not the prosecutor, just the defense attorney.
[01:40:36.100 --> 01:40:37.540]  I'm sorry, defense attorney.
[01:40:38.180 --> 01:40:46.020]  Yeah. So if I just kind of do a normal motion to recuse,
[01:40:46.580 --> 01:40:54.100]  it's not going to really go anywhere. And it's, you know, most likely this won't go anywhere regardless.
[01:40:54.660 --> 01:40:58.740]  But what my plea is, is going to be a larger sort of plea.
[01:40:59.460 --> 01:41:09.220]  Like, look, here's how we pro se are being abused and treated both by the courts and attorneys.
[01:41:09.220 --> 01:41:14.020]  I have an example here in state court where the appeals court recognized me
[01:41:14.980 --> 01:41:20.500]  because I was being abused by the attorney as a meritorious litigant.
[01:41:21.300 --> 01:41:30.580]  I brought value to their court and they rule in my favor. Right? So the judge has opened up this door
[01:41:31.620 --> 01:41:40.420]  for animus towards me where both the judge now and the defense attorney are speaking in concert
[01:41:40.420 --> 01:41:44.900]  with each other about sanctioning me. And what are they sanctioning me on?
[01:41:44.900 --> 01:41:49.540]  Something that's absolutely ridiculous, which is jurisdiction. That's not waivable.
[01:41:49.540 --> 01:41:54.820]  Well, how is that possible? Right? And I actually asked you guys a question
[01:41:54.820 --> 01:42:00.580]  if pro se's are easier to sanction or harder to sanction. I assume they're harder to sanction.
[01:42:00.580 --> 01:42:08.820]  So my filing would be really more a larger plea to, hey, we as pro se litigants
[01:42:09.780 --> 01:42:17.220]  are supposed to be at a disadvantage, but we are being abused. And Chris from Colorado has that
[01:42:17.220 --> 01:42:27.780]  document from the former Judge Merritt E. McAllister where she's talking about how pro se litigants
[01:42:27.780 --> 01:42:32.500]  are at a disadvantage. And I would probably look at that and reference it and make any case
[01:42:32.500 --> 01:42:43.620]  law that she has, but it's sort of a larger pleading towards recusal in the realm of on
[01:42:43.620 --> 01:42:49.220]  behalf of all pro se's per se. If it's just me, they're going to say there's not enough animus
[01:42:49.220 --> 01:42:57.220]  here or there's whatever. They never remand or excuse me, recuse in general. It's a pretty high
[01:42:57.220 --> 01:43:03.380]  bar. And obviously I acknowledge it's a high bar. But if I say, hey, there's a reason here.
[01:43:04.100 --> 01:43:09.700]  You've opened up Pandora's box. You said something you shouldn't have said. It's unrealistic even
[01:43:09.700 --> 01:43:16.900]  what your claim is. And this is the abuse that we pro se litigants have to deal with. And it's
[01:43:16.900 --> 01:43:24.180]  inappropriate. And I would like a new venue per se or a new court per se. What are your thoughts
[01:43:24.180 --> 01:43:32.820]  on that? I think we don't go after the judges near enough. So we need to go after them.
[01:43:34.420 --> 01:43:42.020]  It's just harder in the Fed unless we set them up. I'm going after judges, but I'm kind of setting
[01:43:42.020 --> 01:43:47.300]  them up from the front end so I can go to the attorney general to try to get them arrested.
[01:43:48.340 --> 01:43:53.060]  But once you're in court with them, every time I'm in court with them, they rule against me out of
[01:43:53.060 --> 01:44:01.540]  hand at every turn, no matter what. That's been my experience. I'm actually suing the Fifth Circuit
[01:44:02.180 --> 01:44:09.940]  judges for not giving me a proper hearing after I paid them 700 bucks to do it.
[01:44:12.100 --> 01:44:16.260]  There is a different perspective I'm taking on.
[01:44:16.260 --> 01:44:25.380]  Have you read Walker v. Packer? Yeah, we've talked about it many times.
[01:44:25.380 --> 01:44:32.020]  Okay. Walker v. Packer. It says that it is an abuse of discretion.
[01:44:33.460 --> 01:44:39.700]  Well, I read that and I say, if it's an abuse of discretion,
[01:44:39.780 --> 01:44:48.820]  and the way I read the penal code, if a public official abuses his discretion
[01:44:49.940 --> 01:44:53.780]  and in the process denies being full and free access to her enjoyment right,
[01:44:53.780 --> 01:44:56.420]  how isn't it not a crime just because the judge did it?
[01:44:59.940 --> 01:45:03.060]  I'm saying they don't have any more authority to abuse their discretion
[01:45:03.780 --> 01:45:07.620]  to my detriment than anybody else does. It's a crime.
[01:45:09.700 --> 01:45:17.220]  Nobody's going after them criminally. I'm going after them criminally.
[01:45:20.020 --> 01:45:22.660]  What you're doing is challenging unto itself.
[01:45:24.100 --> 01:45:29.700]  Everybody's going to jump in line to protect them, but that is not going to look good.
[01:45:31.860 --> 01:45:34.740]  That's like playing Russian roulette with their career.
[01:45:35.380 --> 01:45:42.260]  And the good thing about Walker v. Packer is it states that very specifically.
[01:45:43.780 --> 01:45:48.820]  For a judge to fail to properly apply the law to the facts, it's an abuse of discretion.
[01:45:49.940 --> 01:45:51.780]  And they're saying that's the only thing you could appeal.
[01:45:51.780 --> 01:45:59.140]  You know, we just had Trump go after this judge for abusing his discretion.
[01:46:00.820 --> 01:46:02.660]  Why didn't they file criminally against him?
[01:46:02.660 --> 01:46:07.460]  Why didn't they file criminally against him? How is that not a crime?
[01:46:12.260 --> 01:46:14.340]  They are actually filing against judges.
[01:46:15.940 --> 01:46:24.900]  You have two, at least two judges that are being prosecuted for protecting.
[01:46:26.340 --> 01:46:31.780]  No, that's something different. What I'm saying is a judge has no discretion
[01:46:32.660 --> 01:46:40.660]  in properly applying the law to the facts. That's what Walker v. Packer says.
[01:46:41.780 --> 01:46:48.100]  A failure to do so is an abuse of discretion. It's right there in the case law.
[01:46:49.780 --> 01:46:56.580]  So if a public official abuses his discretion and in the process denies me full and free access to
[01:46:56.580 --> 01:46:59.860]  or enjoyment right, that's official misconduct as I read the code.
[01:47:01.860 --> 01:47:06.420]  It's exactly what the code says. So how is it not a crime when a judge does it?
[01:47:09.540 --> 01:47:15.540]  Yeah, I absolutely agree with that. And I think we do need to target judges in that manner because,
[01:47:16.740 --> 01:47:20.420]  you know, with Trump, you're seeing the extreme versions of this.
[01:47:22.020 --> 01:47:24.820]  But even he is not going after him criminally.
[01:47:25.460 --> 01:47:28.420]  Right. We may need to give him the idea.
[01:47:32.820 --> 01:47:35.460]  You'd have to give his prosecutors the idea.
[01:47:36.100 --> 01:47:43.060]  I sent a criminal complaint to the grand jury in Forth to their address at the courthouse in
[01:47:43.060 --> 01:47:49.620]  Suite 300. I get a response back from the federal judge and the federal clerk
[01:47:50.420 --> 01:47:54.980]  said, you filed a civil suit and you didn't pay the filing fee and they dismissed it.
[01:47:56.260 --> 01:48:02.980]  Say what? What are you doing with this? How did you get this? I didn't mail this to you.
[01:48:04.500 --> 01:48:10.260]  I mailed it to the grand jury and the grand jury, according to Scalia, is a fourth branch of government.
[01:48:12.740 --> 01:48:17.300]  So now I'm going to file criminal charges with the U.S. attorney in D.C.
[01:48:18.100 --> 01:48:21.860]  with the grand jury at the address of the U.S. attorney in D.C.
[01:48:23.620 --> 01:48:29.380]  And when I don't get my cover letter back from the grand jury, I'm going to accuse him of
[01:48:29.380 --> 01:48:41.700]  violating separation powers. He is the executive. The judge is the judicial, the grand jury
[01:48:41.700 --> 01:48:48.100]  and the grand jury is the grand jury. Fourth branch of government.
[01:48:51.540 --> 01:48:55.300]  Trying to get that door open. If we can get the door open to the grand jury,
[01:48:55.860 --> 01:49:02.340]  then the judge failed to properly apply the law to the facts. You file a opposition in the court,
[01:49:03.060 --> 01:49:07.140]  you file a judicial content complaint, you file a criminal complaint with the grand jury.
[01:49:07.540 --> 01:49:13.140]  Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, the grand jury is going to know, Bill.
[01:49:15.140 --> 01:49:20.260]  But there was this time I walked into my district attorney's office
[01:49:21.540 --> 01:49:24.980]  and he's sitting there with his head in his hand and I said, what's the matter, Greg?
[01:49:25.780 --> 01:49:30.020]  And he looks up at me with this full-on look on his face and he said,
[01:49:30.980 --> 01:49:37.620]  those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[01:49:39.300 --> 01:49:44.740]  I went to Travis County and demanded to see the minutes of the grand jury.
[01:49:45.940 --> 01:49:52.900]  In Texas, when the grand jury votes, then they're to come before the court with the form of the
[01:49:52.900 --> 01:49:57.940]  grand jury present and read the indictment to the court and the court shall make notes in the
[01:49:57.940 --> 01:50:04.420]  minutes of the court. So I said, I'm going to see those minutes. And Travis County,
[01:50:04.420 --> 01:50:09.540]  they gave them to me. Four or five different minutes from different, they had a grand jury
[01:50:09.540 --> 01:50:16.660]  every day. So I get these and I go through them and every one of them had four or five nobiles.
[01:50:18.900 --> 01:50:22.900]  This grand jury, these grand juries are not a rubber stamp.
[01:50:22.900 --> 01:50:27.860]  Every single one of them had four or five nobiles.
[01:50:29.940 --> 01:50:33.300]  So when you file criminal charges against the district judge
[01:50:34.820 --> 01:50:41.140]  and he's sitting there thinking, well, they're not going to indict me, maybe.
[01:50:43.060 --> 01:50:49.060]  Who wants to play Russian roulette with their career and their liberty?
[01:50:49.300 --> 01:50:52.260]  And then we get these courts back in line.
[01:50:53.940 --> 01:50:58.900]  But as long as there's this unstated presupposition that a judge commit official
[01:50:58.900 --> 01:51:03.940]  oppression, it's not a crime. It's only a crime when somebody else does it.
[01:51:06.180 --> 01:51:08.100]  I'm saying it's time to go for their throats.
[01:51:09.620 --> 01:51:13.700]  This should be a Thursday show. We should do an old Thursday show
[01:51:14.260 --> 01:51:17.460]  training us how to fight the judges this way.
[01:51:37.140 --> 01:51:41.220]  Okay, we are about out of time. Thank you all for listening. We'll be back tomorrow night
[01:51:41.220 --> 01:51:53.540]  at our regular time at nine o'clock Eastern, eight o'clock Central. Work y'all for listening.