ROL_2025-01-17_16k.timecode

Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:03.000]  Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Whatcha Gonna Do?
[00:30.000 --> 00:32.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:34.000 --> 00:36.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:36.000 --> 00:38.000]  When they come for you?
[00:38.000 --> 00:40.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits
[00:40.000 --> 00:42.000]  You go to school and learn the golden rule
[00:42.000 --> 00:46.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[00:46.000 --> 00:48.000]  If you get hot then you must get cool
[00:48.000 --> 00:50.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:50.000 --> 00:52.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:52.000 --> 00:54.000]  When they come for you?
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:56.000 --> 00:58.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:58.000 --> 01:00.000]  When they come for you?
[01:00.000 --> 01:02.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one
[01:02.000 --> 01:06.000]  You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[01:28.000 --> 01:40.000]  Okay, we are making headway
[01:40.000 --> 01:44.000]  Things are moving, we got the suit we filed worked
[01:44.000 --> 01:52.000]  Got the judges doing probable cause determinations
[01:52.000 --> 01:54.000]  They're not doing it right
[01:54.000 --> 01:56.000]  But they're doing it
[01:56.000 --> 02:00.000]  And even if we don't get any further
[02:00.000 --> 02:04.000]  Policemen now look at the prospect
[02:04.000 --> 02:07.000]  Of someone other than the prosecutor
[02:07.000 --> 02:11.000]  Looking at their probable cause statements
[02:11.000 --> 02:13.000]  Prosecutors never bothered to look at them
[02:13.000 --> 02:15.000]  They didn't care
[02:15.000 --> 02:18.000]  As long as they get lots of charges stacked up
[02:18.000 --> 02:24.000]  That they can use to coerce the individual into taking a deal
[02:24.000 --> 02:26.000]  They didn't care what was in the statement
[02:26.000 --> 02:28.000]  Nobody ever looked at it
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  Police would say and do anything they wanted to and be supported
[02:32.000 --> 02:38.000]  Now they got judges looking who have been told
[02:38.000 --> 02:41.000]  They have to make a determination of probable cause
[02:41.000 --> 02:46.000]  Okay, they weren't told to do it exactly right
[02:46.000 --> 02:48.000]  We'll get there
[02:48.000 --> 02:50.000]  But they're doing it
[02:50.000 --> 02:54.000]  Yeah, and the justices of the peace who do this
[02:54.000 --> 02:56.000]  Whether they're doing it right or not
[02:56.000 --> 02:59.000]  These are elected officials
[02:59.000 --> 03:03.000]  So it's good to note from a policeman's standpoint
[03:03.000 --> 03:08.000]  This review, even though it's not happening properly yet
[03:08.000 --> 03:13.000]  This review is happening by somebody who's responsive to the electorate
[03:13.000 --> 03:19.000]  Not somebody who was hired by the same company as the cop
[03:19.000 --> 03:25.000]  To push all this through and get people to rake in the revenue
[03:25.000 --> 03:32.000]  The city has what they call a prosecutor, a city attorney
[03:32.000 --> 03:39.000]  And they're not elected, they're hired by the same city
[03:39.000 --> 03:48.000]  So the policeman has a sense that this city attorney is going to be biased
[03:48.000 --> 03:50.000]  What do you know? He is
[03:50.000 --> 03:55.000]  There's a technical phrase to describe that
[03:55.000 --> 03:59.000]  Conflict of interest?
[03:59.000 --> 04:03.000]  No, they've all got their snouts in the same trough
[04:03.000 --> 04:06.000]  Yes, that's the technical version
[04:06.000 --> 04:08.000]  Yeah, yep, yep
[04:08.000 --> 04:13.000]  But now they've got a magistrate in between
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  And it doesn't, you know
[04:17.000 --> 04:21.000]  At the end of the day
[04:21.000 --> 04:27.000]  For the most part, the magistrates will rule in favor of the policeman
[04:27.000 --> 04:30.000]  If the policeman is acting in any way professional
[04:30.000 --> 04:33.000]  But I've been watching this Judge Flashman
[04:33.000 --> 04:38.000]  A flasher or flashman in Houston
[04:38.000 --> 04:43.000]  And he's actually doing probable cause determinations
[04:43.000 --> 04:52.000]  And he's looking at these and actually paying attention to what the policemen's claim
[04:53.000 --> 05:00.000]  And in one, a guy hit a mailbox in an apartment complex
[05:00.000 --> 05:03.000]  And it's two in the morning, nobody around
[05:03.000 --> 05:05.000]  He called his insurance company, they didn't show up
[05:05.000 --> 05:08.000]  So he went back to his house and went to bed
[05:08.000 --> 05:11.000]  He was going to get a hold of him the next morning
[05:11.000 --> 05:15.000]  And his cop sees the car that is damaged
[05:15.000 --> 05:20.000]  And goes in the house and the prosecutor's reading what he did
[05:20.000 --> 05:23.000]  Said he checked the garage, he wasn't there
[05:23.000 --> 05:26.000]  And the garage door was open to the house
[05:26.000 --> 05:29.000]  And he went to the house and the door wasn't locked
[05:29.000 --> 05:33.000]  And the judge said, whoa, whoa
[05:33.000 --> 05:36.000]  And the prosecutor went on, he went in
[05:36.000 --> 05:39.000]  And the guy was in bed and he woke the guy up
[05:39.000 --> 05:43.000]  And the judge is saying, whoa, whoa
[05:43.000 --> 05:47.000]  And the crux was, what were you doing?
[05:47.000 --> 05:50.000]  You can't go in this guy's house
[05:50.000 --> 05:58.000]  So the cop kind of felt like he's accustomed to doing anything he wants to, nobody questions
[05:58.000 --> 06:05.000]  All of a sudden he's got the judge's question, he throws everything out
[06:05.000 --> 06:13.000]  Now the cop has to explain to the prosecutor and his boss why his charges got thrown out
[06:13.000 --> 06:20.000]  All of a sudden there's consequences
[06:20.000 --> 06:25.000]  So while I don't like the way they're doing it, it's not perfect
[06:25.000 --> 06:27.000]  At least they're doing something
[06:27.000 --> 06:31.000]  Now we move ahead
[06:31.000 --> 06:38.000]  What I'm doing now is I'm going to try to get the state of Texas
[06:38.000 --> 06:47.000]  To issue a referendum or a statement of intent or legislation if I have to
[06:47.000 --> 07:00.000]  That would require the grand jury to hold their doors open for citizens at least one time a month
[07:00.000 --> 07:04.000]  Whether anybody shows up or not
[07:04.000 --> 07:06.000]  That's great
[07:06.000 --> 07:08.000]  Oh, they used to do that
[07:08.000 --> 07:11.000]  When I first moved to Texas, they did that in Fort Worth
[07:11.000 --> 07:14.000]  And then they stopped doing it because nobody showed up
[07:14.000 --> 07:17.000]  So I want to get that put back
[07:17.000 --> 07:23.000]  Well, what if you start with the presumption that they must be doing it right and we're just not getting notice
[07:23.000 --> 07:27.000]  So they need to more clearly give notice to the public
[07:27.000 --> 07:30.000]  Of where the times are that they're available to the public
[07:30.000 --> 07:33.000]  Oh, they're definitely blocking
[07:34.000 --> 07:41.000]  Well, you and I know that, but that's something that they might prefer to just sweep under the rug
[07:41.000 --> 07:44.000]  And say, oh yeah, we were doing it right, you just didn't have notice
[07:44.000 --> 07:46.000]  That's right, that's all we need to do
[07:46.000 --> 07:48.000]  And they might feel a little better about that
[07:48.000 --> 07:52.000]  Well, I'm going to go test it
[07:52.000 --> 07:55.000]  I'm going to go down to Tarrant County
[07:55.000 --> 08:01.000]  And I'll go to a JP and give him some criminal complaints
[08:01.000 --> 08:05.000]  I'll come up with some reason to give him some criminal complaints
[08:05.000 --> 08:11.000]  And the magistrate will refuse to issue a warrant, which is standard procedure
[08:11.000 --> 08:13.000]  Then I'll go down to the grand jury
[08:13.000 --> 08:17.000]  Well, my picture used to be hanging up in the grand jury room
[08:17.000 --> 08:21.000]  But it's not anymore, I don't think it is anyway
[08:21.000 --> 08:28.000]  So I'm going to go down there and tell the bailiff to instruct the foreman that I have business with the grand jury
[08:28.000 --> 08:32.000]  And he's going to tell me to go to the prosecuting attorney
[08:32.000 --> 08:38.000]  And I'm going to tell him, no, you instruct the foreman that I have business with the grand jury
[08:38.000 --> 08:43.000]  And he's going to refuse and I'm going to call 911
[08:43.000 --> 08:52.000]  And make a charge against the bailiff for jury tampering
[08:52.000 --> 08:56.000]  Something, official oppression, I'll make up something for him
[08:56.000 --> 08:59.000]  For blocking my access to the grand jury
[08:59.000 --> 09:03.000]  It's probably official oppression, exerting authority he doesn't have
[09:03.000 --> 09:10.000]  It's acting to shield the accused from prosecution
[09:10.000 --> 09:15.000]  And that I will run through the state
[09:15.000 --> 09:19.000]  And then from the state I'll go to the Fed
[09:19.000 --> 09:30.000]  I have a contact in New Jersey who has just helped Cash Patel finish up a book that he was writing
[09:30.000 --> 09:34.000]  So this woman has a good contact with him
[09:34.000 --> 09:41.000]  I'm going to file criminal charges against the Fifth Circuit judges who dismissed my case
[09:41.000 --> 09:46.000]  And against a judge in Utah
[09:46.000 --> 09:51.000]  I'll send complaints to the grand jury in Utah
[09:51.000 --> 09:55.000]  And get Utah to shield them from the grand jury
[09:55.000 --> 09:59.000]  And hopefully get them to call me and threaten me and do all that kind of stuff
[09:59.000 --> 10:04.000]  And then I'll file against the Fifth Circuit here in Dallas
[10:04.000 --> 10:08.000]  In Fort Worth, they actually have a court in Fort Worth, so I'll go to Fort Worth
[10:08.000 --> 10:16.000]  And I've already called the FBI and was told by the FBI that they do not take complaints from private citizens
[10:16.000 --> 10:22.000]  So, since they can't do that, then the only place left is the grand jury
[10:22.000 --> 10:27.000]  So I'll go down to Fort Worth
[10:27.000 --> 10:30.000]  And do they have a grand jury in Fort Worth?
[10:30.000 --> 10:32.000]  Yes, they do
[10:32.000 --> 10:33.000]  Good
[10:33.000 --> 10:38.000]  I actually filed criminal complaints against the foreman one time
[10:38.000 --> 10:46.000]  Good, okay, I'll go down there and get the US Marshals to give me some crapola
[10:46.000 --> 10:53.000]  And then I'll call the state police and charge these guys with official oppression
[10:53.000 --> 11:00.000]  Because the US courthouse is not a federal enclave
[11:00.000 --> 11:06.000]  It does not belong, it has not been relinquished to the feds by the state
[11:06.000 --> 11:11.000]  So the US Marshals are in this state
[11:11.000 --> 11:20.000]  So I'll call an officer down and insist that he arrest these US Marshals
[11:20.000 --> 11:23.000]  That should get interesting
[11:23.000 --> 11:31.000]  But I'm hoping I've got some folks in the Fort Worth area who will come down there and end the videos
[11:31.000 --> 11:36.000]  So I'm not by myself so they don't beat me into unconsciousness
[11:36.000 --> 11:44.000]  And then I'll run those through the routine, get them to block me from the grand jury
[11:44.000 --> 11:52.000]  Once I get the US attorney to block me from the grand jury, then I'll file with our new attorney general in DC
[11:52.000 --> 11:59.000]  And see if I can get an audience with some of the higher-ups in the attorney general's office
[11:59.000 --> 12:02.000]  Because I want to try to convince them
[12:02.000 --> 12:11.000]  You open that grand jury, say once a month, to the general public
[12:11.000 --> 12:20.000]  Everything that's going wrong, all the shenanigans public officials are pulling, somebody knows about it
[12:20.000 --> 12:27.000]  But prosecutors have been shielding the grand jury from the public
[12:27.000 --> 12:39.000]  I'm going to argue when I sue the US attorney in DC for jury tampering, for blocking my access to the grand jury
[12:39.000 --> 12:46.000]  I will allege that they converted this republic into a democracy
[12:46.000 --> 12:56.000]  By blocking me from a grand jury, that eliminated a primary defense against bad law and bad government
[12:56.000 --> 13:02.000]  Yeah, and they're trying to take this, what's the fourth branch of government?
[13:02.000 --> 13:06.000]  They're trying to take that away and bundle it up under the prosecutor
[13:07.000 --> 13:21.000]  And since, who was it, the Montgomery v. State, the one that was murdered, the federal judge that was murdered, Scalia
[13:21.000 --> 13:29.000]  He's the one that said that the grand jury is essentially a fourth branch of government
[13:29.000 --> 13:35.000]  It's not a part of the judicial, executive, or the legislative
[13:35.000 --> 13:45.000]  So for the judicial to block me from a different branch of government, that's going to make a great issue to push to the Fed
[13:45.000 --> 13:53.000]  See if I can get them to open up the grand jury, that I believe will change everything
[13:53.000 --> 13:57.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back
[14:06.000 --> 14:13.000]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[14:13.000 --> 14:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[14:19.000 --> 14:23.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons
[14:23.000 --> 14:25.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[14:25.000 --> 14:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[14:28.000 --> 14:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[14:32.000 --> 14:37.000]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[14:39.000 --> 14:45.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[14:45.000 --> 14:48.000]  Or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com
[14:48.000 --> 14:50.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[14:50.000 --> 14:56.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[14:56.000 --> 14:58.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[14:59.000 --> 15:03.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[15:03.000 --> 15:06.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[15:06.000 --> 15:08.000]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[15:08.000 --> 15:11.000]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[15:11.000 --> 15:14.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[15:14.000 --> 15:15.000]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[15:15.000 --> 15:18.000]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[15:18.000 --> 15:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[15:24.000 --> 15:27.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[15:27.000 --> 15:30.000]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[15:30.000 --> 15:32.000]  That will help you understand what due process is
[15:32.000 --> 15:34.000]  And how to hold courts to the Rule of Law
[15:34.000 --> 15:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[15:38.000 --> 15:39.000]  And ordering your copy today
[15:39.000 --> 15:41.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[15:41.000 --> 15:44.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[15:44.000 --> 15:46.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[15:46.000 --> 15:49.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[15:49.000 --> 15:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[15:53.000 --> 15:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[16:23.000 --> 16:40.000]  The world is spinning like it's out of control
[16:40.000 --> 16:41.000]  On the edge of a hole
[16:41.000 --> 16:44.000]  Hey, Randy Hilton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[16:44.000 --> 16:52.000]  And we're planning a strategy to get grand juries back in place
[16:52.000 --> 16:55.000]  Now, I've done a lot of work on this in the past
[16:55.000 --> 17:02.000]  And I actually got to the grand jury in Johnson County
[17:02.000 --> 17:05.000]  That's down in Cleburne
[17:05.000 --> 17:12.000]  The grand jury, after they have voted, is required to come before the court
[17:12.000 --> 17:14.000]  With a quorum of the grand jury present
[17:14.000 --> 17:17.000]  Come before the court or the clerk
[17:17.000 --> 17:19.000]  With a quorum of the grand jury present
[17:19.000 --> 17:21.000]  And they did that
[17:21.000 --> 17:25.000]  And they came before the court, convened a hearing
[17:25.000 --> 17:29.000]  And I was sitting in here in the court
[17:29.000 --> 17:32.000]  Everybody's looking over me like, who is that?
[17:32.000 --> 17:39.000]  And the grand jury comes in, the foreman reads all the true bills onto the record
[17:39.000 --> 17:42.000]  The clerk makes notes in the minutes of the court
[17:42.000 --> 17:47.000]  When they finish, the judge said, does the grand jury have any further business?
[17:47.000 --> 17:50.000]  And the foreman said, no, Your Honor, we do not
[17:50.000 --> 17:54.000]  And I stood up in the courtroom and said, yes, you do
[17:54.000 --> 17:57.000]  The judge said, who are you? I'm Randy Hilton
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  What business do you have with this grand jury?
[18:00.000 --> 18:07.000]  Well, the prosecutor district attorney and assistant district attorney were sitting there
[18:07.000 --> 18:08.000]  And they're ducking and dodging
[18:08.000 --> 18:11.000]  They know exactly what my business is
[18:11.000 --> 18:14.000]  I said, well, Your Honor, I have some criminal complaints
[18:14.000 --> 18:17.000]  To file against some public officials
[18:17.000 --> 18:19.000]  And which officials are those?
[18:19.000 --> 18:24.000]  Well, this prosecutor's assistant district attorney here
[18:24.000 --> 18:27.000]  And this district attorney here
[18:27.000 --> 18:31.000]  And you, Judge
[18:31.000 --> 18:34.000]  It was glorious
[18:34.000 --> 18:38.000]  The judge just froze in his tracks
[18:38.000 --> 18:44.000]  He's looking at me like, you just bushwhacked me in front of my own grand jury
[18:44.000 --> 18:47.000]  Yes, as a matter of fact, I did
[18:47.000 --> 18:53.000]  And they set a time to hear my complaints
[18:53.000 --> 19:01.000]  And I was called into the grand jury to present the district attorney to the grand jury
[19:01.000 --> 19:08.000]  And when I went down to the courthouse
[19:08.000 --> 19:13.000]  I had given them complaints
[19:13.000 --> 19:16.000]  And found out when the grand jury was going to meet
[19:16.000 --> 19:21.000]  I called the prosecutor that day and asked her when the grand jury was going to meet
[19:21.000 --> 19:23.000]  She said, oh, Mr. Kelton, you're too late
[19:23.000 --> 19:25.000]  They just met yesterday
[19:25.000 --> 19:27.000]  Lie your pants on fire
[19:27.000 --> 19:29.000]  I already talked to the clerk
[19:29.000 --> 19:33.000]  They were in the basement meeting as we were speaking
[19:33.000 --> 19:39.000]  And I said, oh, well, that's too bad
[19:39.000 --> 19:43.000]  And then a few hours later she's in a court hearing
[19:43.000 --> 19:45.000]  Talking to the judge
[19:45.000 --> 19:49.000]  And she turns around and there I am sitting in the court
[19:49.000 --> 19:52.000]  And she was just like something out of a cartoon
[19:52.000 --> 19:54.000]  She's turning
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  And sees me and her emotions just ground to a halt
[20:00.000 --> 20:06.000]  She froze for a few seconds and then ran over to her assistant
[20:06.000 --> 20:10.000]  And jibber jabber jibber jabber and the assistant shot out of the courtroom
[20:10.000 --> 20:13.000]  I knew what they were doing
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  They were taking my complaints that I gave them to give to the grand jury
[20:17.000 --> 20:21.000]  And taking it and giving it to the grand jury
[20:21.000 --> 20:23.000]  Too late
[20:23.000 --> 20:25.000]  Better hurry up
[20:25.000 --> 20:27.000]  I already did that
[20:27.000 --> 20:29.000]  You're a little late
[20:29.000 --> 20:33.000]  When I got there I went down to where the grand jury meets
[20:33.000 --> 20:36.000]  And told the foreman my name's Randy Kelton struck the foreman
[20:36.000 --> 20:39.000]  I have business with the grand jury
[20:39.000 --> 20:42.000]  Can I tell him the nature of the business?
[20:42.000 --> 20:45.000]  He knew exactly what the nature of the business was
[20:45.000 --> 20:47.000]  This bailiff really hated me
[20:47.000 --> 20:50.000]  I had to crawl down his throat a time or two
[20:50.000 --> 20:52.000]  I said yes you can give him this
[20:52.000 --> 20:56.000]  And I gave him a folder about two inches thick
[20:56.000 --> 20:59.000]  And he looked at the folder and he looked at me
[20:59.000 --> 21:03.000]  And looked at the folder and I said I know what you're thinking
[21:03.000 --> 21:09.000]  You're thinking I should go talk to the district attorney
[21:09.000 --> 21:11.000]  Bad idea
[21:11.000 --> 21:15.000]  These complaints are against the district attorney
[21:15.000 --> 21:19.000]  Well I'll just see what the foreman of the grand jury has to say
[21:19.000 --> 21:21.000]  Good idea
[21:21.000 --> 21:23.000]  So he goes in and gives it to him
[21:23.000 --> 21:25.000]  And I'm sitting there waiting
[21:25.000 --> 21:30.000]  And this little short guy had a prosecutor who was about five foot four
[21:30.000 --> 21:34.000]  He's always standing up on his tippy toes trying to look taller
[21:34.000 --> 21:37.000]  He come down and started to go into the jury room
[21:37.000 --> 21:40.000]  And I stood up and said hold on
[21:40.000 --> 21:43.000]  You do not want to go in there
[21:43.000 --> 21:46.000]  They're deliberating on charges against your boss
[21:46.000 --> 21:48.000]  You need to stay out of there
[21:48.000 --> 21:50.000]  I'm going to go talk to the grand jury
[21:50.000 --> 21:52.000]  Well before you do that
[21:52.000 --> 21:54.000]  You might want to go up to your office
[21:54.000 --> 21:57.000]  Get out your resume and dust it off
[21:57.000 --> 21:59.000]  Because you're going to need it
[21:59.000 --> 22:02.000]  He just goes on into the grand jury room
[22:02.000 --> 22:04.000]  So they no-billed him
[22:04.000 --> 22:06.000]  Well they called me in
[22:06.000 --> 22:10.000]  And clearly the foreman was furious
[22:10.000 --> 22:14.000]  Mr. Kelton what do you have against the district attorney?
[22:14.000 --> 22:16.000]  Oh I don't have anything against him
[22:16.000 --> 22:18.000]  He never prosecuted me
[22:18.000 --> 22:20.000]  He never prosecuted anybody I know
[22:20.000 --> 22:22.000]  I don't have any problem with him at all
[22:22.000 --> 22:24.000]  Then why are you here?
[22:24.000 --> 22:28.000]  Well he violated some law
[22:28.000 --> 22:32.000]  That's why I'm here but I don't want him prosecuted
[22:32.000 --> 22:35.000]  Well if you don't want him prosecuted why are you here?
[22:35.000 --> 22:39.000]  Well because I'm here
[22:39.000 --> 22:42.000]  And he's out there
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  Wondering if you're going to end his career tomorrow
[22:46.000 --> 22:48.000]  That's all I need
[22:48.000 --> 22:51.000]  I'm glad I'm not in your shoes
[22:51.000 --> 22:55.000]  You have to decide whether or not I've given you enough information to believe
[22:55.000 --> 22:58.000]  A crime has been committed and that he committed it
[22:58.000 --> 23:00.000]  I'm glad I don't have to do that
[23:00.000 --> 23:02.000]  Oh boy he was furious
[23:02.000 --> 23:06.000]  So they no-billed him
[23:06.000 --> 23:10.000]  Then he finds out his assistant DA went in there
[23:10.000 --> 23:14.000]  Talked to the grand jury while they were deliberating
[23:14.000 --> 23:18.000]  Deliberating on complaints against him
[23:18.000 --> 23:22.000]  I come back two days later and this guy's gone
[23:22.000 --> 23:27.000]  So after I talked to the grand jury I went upstairs
[23:27.000 --> 23:29.000]  I'm waiting to see what they rule
[23:29.000 --> 23:34.000]  And I went and sat down in the courtroom and that's when the prosecutor saw me
[23:34.000 --> 23:36.000]  Oh crap
[23:36.000 --> 23:38.000]  She's going to run down with these complaints
[23:38.000 --> 23:40.000]  It's too late for that
[23:40.000 --> 23:44.000]  And then I go out in the hall and there's a sergeant out there
[23:44.000 --> 23:46.000]  And he was a pretty good guy
[23:46.000 --> 23:48.000]  I got along with him really well
[23:48.000 --> 23:50.000]  He knew how to handle me
[23:50.000 --> 23:52.000]  He didn't cop an attitude
[23:52.000 --> 23:54.000]  He dealt with me like a human being
[23:54.000 --> 23:56.000]  Never had any problem with me
[23:56.000 --> 24:01.000]  And he said Mr. Kelton you seem like a personable individual
[24:01.000 --> 24:03.000]  I said well I try to be
[24:03.000 --> 24:06.000]  He said you mind if I give you a little advice
[24:06.000 --> 24:07.000]  Well sure
[24:07.000 --> 24:11.000]  When you come down here poking the bear the way you do
[24:11.000 --> 24:13.000]  You really need to be careful
[24:13.000 --> 24:15.000]  Oh don't worry sergeant
[24:15.000 --> 24:17.000]  I am always very careful
[24:17.000 --> 24:21.000]  Besides you don't understand
[24:21.000 --> 24:24.000]  I am the bear
[24:24.000 --> 24:27.000]  And he kind of chuckled and he said
[24:27.000 --> 24:32.000]  Yes Mr. Kelton today you are the bear
[24:32.000 --> 24:35.000]  About five years later
[24:35.000 --> 24:37.000]  I had somebody contact me
[24:37.000 --> 24:39.000]  He's in a foreclosure issue
[24:39.000 --> 24:41.000]  I helped him with some documents
[24:41.000 --> 24:45.000]  He took him down to Philo and the clerk wouldn't file the documents
[24:45.000 --> 24:48.000]  He called me all upset about it
[24:48.000 --> 24:50.000]  And I said well go to the sheriff's office
[24:50.000 --> 24:52.000]  And file charges against her
[24:52.000 --> 24:54.000]  Oh they won't do anything
[24:54.000 --> 24:56.000]  I said no guys this is Randall County
[24:56.000 --> 24:58.000]  They'll do something
[24:58.000 --> 25:00.000]  He goes down and tells the sheriff that he
[25:00.000 --> 25:04.000]  Tried to file these motions in his case
[25:04.000 --> 25:08.000]  And the clerk refused to accept him
[25:08.000 --> 25:11.000]  The clerk they had got him this captain
[25:11.000 --> 25:13.000]  The captain said are you in a hurry
[25:13.000 --> 25:15.000]  He said no I'm not
[25:15.000 --> 25:19.000]  If you'll wait here I'll go check this out
[25:19.000 --> 25:22.000]  He's gone about 30 minutes he comes back
[25:22.000 --> 25:25.000]  And he said the clerk said if you will
[25:25.000 --> 25:28.000]  That there was a mistake if you will come down in the morning
[25:28.000 --> 25:31.000]  He will take your filings
[25:31.000 --> 25:33.000]  They had already closed
[25:33.000 --> 25:35.000]  He went down the next day and said they were
[25:35.000 --> 25:38.000]  Bending over backwards to be nice to him
[25:38.000 --> 25:40.000]  Yeah how about that
[25:40.000 --> 25:43.000]  That district attorney told them
[25:43.000 --> 25:47.000]  If you get a complaint against a public official
[25:47.000 --> 25:49.000]  You bring that to me
[25:49.000 --> 25:51.000]  Do not screw with it
[25:51.000 --> 25:54.000]  I'm not going here again
[25:54.000 --> 25:57.000]  So it works
[25:57.000 --> 26:01.000]  We step in the middle of them it works
[26:01.000 --> 26:05.000]  We sued all the highest judges in Texas
[26:05.000 --> 26:09.000]  They got another corrupt judge set of judges to throw it out
[26:09.000 --> 26:14.000]  But to keep me from suing them again
[26:14.000 --> 26:17.000]  They changed the bench book
[26:17.000 --> 26:20.000]  We can do this
[26:20.000 --> 26:23.000]  So now got that part in
[26:23.000 --> 26:27.000]  Now we pry open the door to the grand jury
[26:27.000 --> 26:30.000]  And if we get people that will
[26:30.000 --> 26:33.000]  Actually go to the grand jury
[26:33.000 --> 26:36.000]  And ripe, raise cane
[26:36.000 --> 26:39.000]  Jump up and down and rail in righteous indignation
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  Whether we get these guys indicted or not
[26:42.000 --> 26:47.000]  We're going to scare them with Jesus out of them
[26:47.000 --> 26:49.000]  Let's start getting our acts straight
[26:49.000 --> 26:52.000]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it
[26:52.000 --> 26:54.000]  We've got some callers, Tina
[26:54.000 --> 26:56.000]  We'll pick you up on the other side
[26:56.000 --> 26:58.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain
[26:58.000 --> 27:00.000]  We'll be right back
[27:02.000 --> 27:05.000]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work
[27:05.000 --> 27:07.000]  But have they negatively affected our health?
[27:07.000 --> 27:09.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[27:09.000 --> 27:11.000]  And I'll be back in just a moment with new findings
[27:11.000 --> 27:15.000]  About how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry
[27:15.000 --> 27:17.000]  Privacy is under attack
[27:17.000 --> 27:19.000]  When you give up data about yourself
[27:19.000 --> 27:21.000]  You'll never get it back again
[27:21.000 --> 27:24.000]  If you keep on, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[27:24.000 --> 27:26.000]  So protect your rights
[27:26.000 --> 27:29.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[27:29.000 --> 27:32.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[27:32.000 --> 27:35.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[27:35.000 --> 27:39.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[27:39.000 --> 27:42.000]  Start over with Startpage
[27:43.000 --> 27:46.000]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy
[27:46.000 --> 27:47.000]  It's a fact
[27:47.000 --> 27:49.000]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone
[27:49.000 --> 27:52.000]  This kind of radiation near your head has been disputed
[27:52.000 --> 27:54.000]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors
[27:54.000 --> 27:56.000]  While cell phone companies have downplayed concerns
[27:56.000 --> 27:59.000]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association
[27:59.000 --> 28:02.000]  Is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry
[28:02.000 --> 28:06.000]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism
[28:06.000 --> 28:09.000]  In the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna
[28:09.000 --> 28:11.000]  Increases when the cell phone is on
[28:11.000 --> 28:14.000]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage
[28:14.000 --> 28:16.000]  I'm not taking any chances
[28:16.000 --> 28:18.000]  I always keep the phone far from my body
[28:18.000 --> 28:20.000]  I use a corded headset
[28:20.000 --> 28:21.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[28:21.000 --> 28:24.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[28:48.000 --> 28:52.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[28:52.000 --> 28:54.000]  And a better understanding of His Word?
[28:54.000 --> 28:57.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays
[28:57.000 --> 29:00.000]  From 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripure Talk
[29:00.000 --> 29:03.000]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures
[29:03.000 --> 29:05.000]  In accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[29:05.000 --> 29:07.000]  Study to find out more about the Bible
[29:07.000 --> 29:09.000]  And how to read the Bible
[29:09.000 --> 29:11.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:11.000 --> 29:13.000]  For more information
[29:13.000 --> 29:15.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:15.000 --> 29:17.000]  For more information
[29:17.000 --> 29:19.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:19.000 --> 29:21.000]  For more information
[29:21.000 --> 29:23.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:23.000 --> 29:25.000]  For more information
[29:25.000 --> 29:27.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:27.000 --> 29:29.000]  For more information
[29:29.000 --> 29:31.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:31.000 --> 29:33.000]  For more information
[29:33.000 --> 29:35.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:35.000 --> 29:37.000]  For more information
[29:37.000 --> 29:39.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:39.000 --> 29:41.000]  For more information
[29:41.000 --> 29:43.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:43.000 --> 29:45.000]  For more information
[29:45.000 --> 29:47.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:47.000 --> 29:49.000]  For more information
[29:49.000 --> 29:51.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000]  For more information
[29:53.000 --> 29:55.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:55.000 --> 29:57.000]  For more information
[29:57.000 --> 29:59.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:59.000 --> 30:01.000]  For more information
[30:01.000 --> 30:03.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:03.000 --> 30:05.000]  For more information
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:07.000 --> 30:09.000]  For more information
[30:09.000 --> 30:11.000]  Visit LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:11.000 --> 30:13.000]  For more information
[30:13.000 --> 30:15.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000]  For more information
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:19.000 --> 30:21.000]  For more information
[30:21.000 --> 30:23.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000]  For more information
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:27.000 --> 30:29.000]  For more information
[30:29.000 --> 30:31.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:31.000 --> 30:33.000]  For more information
[30:33.000 --> 30:35.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:35.000 --> 30:37.000]  For more information
[30:37.000 --> 30:39.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:39.000 --> 30:41.000]  For more information
[30:41.000 --> 30:43.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:43.000 --> 30:45.000]  For more information
[30:45.000 --> 30:47.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:47.000 --> 30:49.000]  For more information
[30:49.000 --> 30:51.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:51.000 --> 30:53.000]  For more information
[30:53.000 --> 30:55.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:55.000 --> 30:57.000]  For more information
[30:57.000 --> 30:59.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[30:59.000 --> 31:01.000]  For more information
[31:01.000 --> 31:05.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:05.000 --> 31:07.000]  For more information
[31:07.000 --> 31:09.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:09.000 --> 31:11.000]  For more information
[31:11.000 --> 31:13.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:13.000 --> 31:15.000]  For more information
[31:15.000 --> 31:17.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:17.000 --> 31:19.000]  For more information
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:21.000 --> 31:23.000]  For more information
[31:23.000 --> 31:25.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000]  For more information
[31:27.000 --> 31:29.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:29.000 --> 31:31.000]  For more information
[31:31.000 --> 31:33.000]  Visit Logos RadioNetwork.com
[31:33.000 --> 31:35.000]  For more information
[31:35.000 --> 31:38.440]  You told us yesterday you had some crowing to do.
[31:38.440 --> 31:45.840]  Just a little crowing, but you know every step is a step in the right direction.
[31:45.840 --> 31:54.000]  And this is in relation to the consignment store that defrauded more than 70 people where
[31:54.000 --> 32:00.520]  I had filed an adversary proceeding and actually won that adversary proceeding after a four-year
[32:00.520 --> 32:11.440]  battle, which is 99% of Chapter 7s go through without a hitch within a few months.
[32:11.440 --> 32:14.920]  This lasted four years and it was denied.
[32:14.920 --> 32:16.560]  We got a judgment.
[32:16.560 --> 32:22.600]  The judges filed a Chapter 13 three days after the judgment was ordered.
[32:22.600 --> 32:28.920]  So I fought that and the judge said, well, they're trying their best.
[32:29.160 --> 32:30.680]  They're doing better.
[32:30.680 --> 32:33.280]  They're trying to make a plan.
[32:33.280 --> 32:35.400]  Well, no, really.
[32:35.400 --> 32:41.120]  If they really wanted to make a plan and attempt to pay all the debt as fairly as they stated
[32:41.120 --> 32:47.520]  in their papers, they would never have tried to file the Chapter 7 to dismiss all that debt.
[32:47.520 --> 32:48.800]  Exactly.
[32:48.800 --> 32:53.400]  Yeah, one would like to give their fellow man the benefit of the doubt and imagine that
[32:53.400 --> 32:54.400]  they're doing their best.
[32:54.400 --> 32:59.320]  However, the fruits of their actions are clear.
[32:59.320 --> 33:08.560]  So I filed an appeal to, because I asked for at least her to be dismissed from the bankruptcy
[33:08.560 --> 33:11.680]  after she was convicted of the felony embezzlement.
[33:11.680 --> 33:19.160]  And we were awarded restitution, which is you can never discharge in bankruptcy and
[33:19.160 --> 33:21.480]  neither can our civil judgment.
[33:21.480 --> 33:28.480]  But anyway, they suddenly, after I filed the appeal and I put all this in the appeal,
[33:28.480 --> 33:31.240]  I really think I did a pretty good job.
[33:31.240 --> 33:36.720]  If I say so myself, because I called out the attorney, I called out them.
[33:36.720 --> 33:42.400]  And all of a sudden, they voluntarily dismissed their Chapter 13.
[33:42.400 --> 33:43.880]  Now, isn't that odd?
[33:43.880 --> 33:46.720]  They were in protection.
[33:46.800 --> 33:54.320]  Now, I'm thinking that their attorney decided he was going to need about $10,000 to answer
[33:54.320 --> 34:01.920]  the appeal, because appeals are very expensive to, you know, if you hire an attorney to fire
[34:01.920 --> 34:06.240]  one, they will insist on $10,000 to start.
[34:06.240 --> 34:13.160]  And so that is my presumption that they did that, but I'm not sure exactly.
[34:13.160 --> 34:20.120]  So right now, I've hired a collection agency to go to try and attach at least one of their
[34:20.120 --> 34:21.560]  wages.
[34:21.560 --> 34:25.600]  But in the meantime, it actually happened on my birthday.
[34:25.600 --> 34:38.160]  I got a check from the, you know, our county's probation department in the grand sum of $48.93
[34:38.160 --> 34:41.640]  as part of the first part of my restitution payment.
[34:41.640 --> 34:48.640]  And then I got a second check, I think, three weeks later for the same amount, you know.
[34:48.640 --> 34:56.000]  And she's only paid $200 in the last seven months towards this criminal restitution.
[34:56.000 --> 34:58.120]  But at least I got two checks.
[34:58.120 --> 35:04.040]  And the probation department said, nobody ever, you know, goes as far as you guys did.
[35:04.040 --> 35:09.920]  They just don't, they give up because they run into all these hurdles.
[35:10.720 --> 35:13.720]  And they said, I never give up.
[35:13.720 --> 35:19.360]  And so I, you know, they transferred it down to Los Angeles County and I said, well, we
[35:19.360 --> 35:23.120]  don't want it transferred down there because they're overworked, understaffed, and we'll
[35:23.120 --> 35:25.000]  never get through to them.
[35:25.000 --> 35:29.040]  But I did manage to get through to them today and found out, well, if the judge orders it
[35:29.040 --> 35:32.760]  transferred, then it has to go that way.
[35:32.760 --> 35:37.380]  But then one of them said, well, we only do the supervision of the probation.
[35:37.380 --> 35:41.660]  We don't do the financials because we have to send it back to your county for distribution.
[35:41.660 --> 35:48.460]  So my next thing after talking to the supervisor is I may be writing to the judge asking her
[35:48.460 --> 35:54.660]  to keep jurisdiction over the financial part because we at least get to talk to the probation
[35:54.660 --> 35:55.660]  department here.
[35:55.660 --> 35:56.660]  They actually answer the phone.
[35:56.660 --> 36:01.460]  But two checks, I know I have a long way to go because my judgment in the criminal was
[36:01.460 --> 36:06.940]  150,500, but hey, it's better than a kick in the teeth.
[36:06.940 --> 36:10.900]  So it's a little bit of a win.
[36:10.900 --> 36:14.260]  Wonderful.
[36:14.260 --> 36:16.780]  Now you're getting rich.
[36:16.780 --> 36:22.940]  Yeah, you got $48 twice.
[36:22.940 --> 36:28.700]  Yeah, that's a miracle.
[36:28.700 --> 36:29.700]  That is wonderful.
[36:29.900 --> 36:38.060]  For those of you who haven't followed this all the way, Tina have really worked on this.
[36:38.060 --> 36:45.060]  And she kind of is a mascot we need to get for Tina, an English bulldog.
[36:45.060 --> 36:46.060]  Yes.
[36:46.060 --> 36:53.580]  I think there's another little bit about it.
[36:53.580 --> 37:00.780]  One of her attorneys in the adversary proceeding was a guy named David Lally who lived in New
[37:00.780 --> 37:06.300]  York but had practiced in California and kept his license, and he represented them.
[37:06.300 --> 37:12.020]  And it turns out that, you know, long story, but he'd represented someone that had gone
[37:12.020 --> 37:14.300]  against me in a bankruptcy.
[37:14.300 --> 37:20.420]  And once I rebutted their argument, he never contacted me again.
[37:20.660 --> 37:28.580]  But he told the other debtor, Kevin, the creditor, who called him up and he said, is that other
[37:28.580 --> 37:30.580]  — what did he use the word?
[37:30.580 --> 37:31.580]  Like a bulldog.
[37:31.580 --> 37:35.380]  It was actually, I think that was his, is she still with you?
[37:35.380 --> 37:38.260]  And he said, oh yeah, she is instrumental in this.
[37:38.260 --> 37:40.540]  He said, well, I have to give a credit.
[37:40.540 --> 37:41.540]  She never gave up.
[37:41.540 --> 37:42.540]  None of you did.
[37:42.540 --> 37:44.540]  And he said, nobody does this.
[37:44.540 --> 37:47.540]  He said, you know, they deserve what they're getting.
[37:47.660 --> 37:50.660]  And he said, you know, they lied to me.
[37:50.660 --> 37:53.660]  He said, they're just consummate liars, these two.
[37:53.660 --> 37:58.660]  And he, you know, he gave him a little bit of background, but he said, I really admire
[37:58.660 --> 38:01.660]  you all for sticking to it like you did.
[38:01.660 --> 38:04.660]  All right.
[38:04.660 --> 38:10.860]  And he quit and said, he actually put in the papers, I'm tired of babysitting.
[38:10.860 --> 38:12.340]  They don't follow my orders.
[38:12.340 --> 38:13.940]  They don't follow my suggestions.
[38:14.340 --> 38:16.340]  They refused to give discovery.
[38:16.340 --> 38:18.340]  And I want out of this case.
[38:25.340 --> 38:30.340]  So if she doesn't cover the restitution, does she go back to jail?
[38:32.340 --> 38:39.900]  Well, she's only served, had to serve one day in jail, but she — out of the 25th,
[38:40.860 --> 38:47.860]  she will be in violation of her probation in terms of making payments to the restitution.
[38:47.860 --> 38:52.860]  And that's what I'm going to put in my letter to the court if the supervisor thinks
[38:52.860 --> 38:53.860]  it's right to do that.
[38:53.860 --> 38:54.860]  She told me to hold off.
[38:54.860 --> 38:55.860]  She suggested it.
[38:55.860 --> 39:00.860]  And then once I found this information out from L.A., she said, hold off until I talk
[39:00.860 --> 39:01.860]  to them.
[39:01.860 --> 39:03.860]  But I'll be asking that.
[39:03.860 --> 39:07.860]  I'll be saying, this person has no intention of paying us.
[39:08.820 --> 39:11.820]  She's clearly lying about her income and expenses.
[39:11.820 --> 39:13.820]  And I'll give you proof of that.
[39:13.820 --> 39:17.820]  And I'm going to ask her if she'll put her in jail.
[39:17.820 --> 39:22.820]  But yes, they can jail her if she's in violation.
[39:22.820 --> 39:23.820]  Will they?
[39:23.820 --> 39:24.820]  I'm not sure.
[39:27.820 --> 39:32.820]  Well, at least she has the threat of jail hanging over her.
[39:33.780 --> 39:44.780]  Also, since you are in California, you're near Los Angeles, aren't you, San Luis Obispo?
[39:44.780 --> 39:47.780]  Yeah, I'm three hours away from L.A.
[39:49.780 --> 39:56.780]  What is the temperament of Californians right now?
[39:57.740 --> 40:06.740]  They are sick to death of the mayor of L.A. and Governor Newscombe.
[40:06.740 --> 40:08.740]  Oh, really?
[40:08.740 --> 40:10.740]  Yeah, there's been quite a turn.
[40:10.740 --> 40:13.740]  They're asking for his resignation.
[40:13.740 --> 40:15.740]  It's been a total mismanagement.
[40:15.740 --> 40:21.740]  One of the main reservoirs near the Pasadena fire was empty and has been empty for months
[40:21.740 --> 40:23.740]  and not repaired.
[40:24.700 --> 40:30.700]  The mayor of L.A., right as these warnings were coming in about the winds, flew off to
[40:30.700 --> 40:33.700]  Ghana to some inauguration.
[40:33.700 --> 40:36.700]  So she abandoned her people.
[40:36.700 --> 40:38.700]  It's not looking good for them.
[40:38.700 --> 40:40.700]  People are sick.
[40:41.700 --> 40:42.700]  Good.
[40:42.700 --> 40:46.700]  That's what I wanted to hear because, you know, we're outside California, so we're
[40:46.700 --> 40:50.700]  not hearing what's going on actually inside.
[40:51.660 --> 40:54.660]  I'm hoping that the next interim election, California turns red.
[40:54.660 --> 40:55.660]  Hang on.
[40:55.660 --> 40:57.660]  We'll be right back.
[40:59.660 --> 41:02.660]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:02.660 --> 41:06.660]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:06.660 --> 41:10.660]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:10.660 --> 41:15.660]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[41:15.660 --> 41:17.660]  by lowering the claims cost?
[41:18.620 --> 41:23.620]  The CHANT Plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides
[41:23.620 --> 41:30.620]  your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero
[41:30.620 --> 41:32.620]  cost with zero copay.
[41:32.620 --> 41:38.620]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[41:38.620 --> 41:44.620]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[41:45.580 --> 41:50.580]  The CHANT Plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[41:50.580 --> 41:58.580]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[41:59.580 --> 42:02.580]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:02.580 --> 42:06.580]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary.
[42:06.580 --> 42:12.580]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[42:12.580 --> 42:14.580]  step by step.
[42:15.540 --> 42:18.540]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[42:18.540 --> 42:22.540]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[42:22.540 --> 42:27.540]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[42:27.540 --> 42:33.540]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[42:33.540 --> 42:38.540]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[42:38.540 --> 42:42.540]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[42:43.500 --> 42:48.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[42:48.500 --> 42:51.500]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[42:51.500 --> 42:59.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[43:13.500 --> 43:16.500]  Whoa whoa whoa whoa
[43:19.500 --> 43:22.500]  Whoa whoa whoa whoa
[43:23.500 --> 43:28.500]  Always I must be careful what I'm wishing for
[43:29.500 --> 43:34.500]  When I'm hungry I like to know just what I'm fishing for
[43:34.500 --> 43:39.500]  I ain't asking for much I ain't trying to be no glutton
[43:40.460 --> 43:45.460]  I'm just here making my living pushing buttons
[43:45.460 --> 43:51.460]  I give my message out to anyone in shot and distance
[43:51.460 --> 43:57.460]  I vote for bravery and against slavery showing resistance
[43:57.460 --> 44:02.460]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting
[44:02.460 --> 44:08.460]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelvin, Fountain Rule of Law Radio, we're talking to Tina in California
[44:09.420 --> 44:11.420]  And I was talking to Brad on the break
[44:11.420 --> 44:18.420]  They have, I saw one deal where they had these super scooper firefighting planes
[44:18.420 --> 44:21.420]  The one using it, it was in a museum
[44:21.420 --> 44:26.420]  In a lake, but they had it as a museum piece
[44:26.420 --> 44:31.420]  Canada brought some down and was helping with the fire
[44:31.420 --> 44:37.420]  The airplanes that California had weren't using, Canada come down and brought them
[44:38.380 --> 44:43.380]  And I watched these guys fighting that fire with big jets
[44:43.380 --> 44:46.380]  Man, that is insane
[44:50.380 --> 44:53.380]  Well I'm a pilot and if you've never flown an airplane
[44:53.380 --> 44:57.380]  They don't maneuver like cars do
[44:57.380 --> 45:00.380]  In a car you turn the wheel, the car turns
[45:00.380 --> 45:03.380]  Not so in an airplane
[45:04.340 --> 45:07.340]  In an airplane you put pressure on the controls
[45:07.340 --> 45:11.340]  And those pressure, the controls put pressure on the air
[45:11.340 --> 45:14.340]  And then the aircraft responds
[45:14.340 --> 45:17.340]  There's a delay
[45:17.340 --> 45:20.340]  In small airplanes like I flew, there wasn't much delay
[45:20.340 --> 45:22.340]  But there was a noticeable delay
[45:22.340 --> 45:25.340]  As the airplane gets bigger
[45:25.340 --> 45:28.340]  There's much much more delay
[45:28.340 --> 45:31.340]  And I was watching, they're filming this
[45:32.300 --> 45:35.300]  Airplane dropping down, just barely cleared a ridge
[45:35.300 --> 45:38.300]  And dumped the water and then had to climb out
[45:38.300 --> 45:41.300]  To keep from hitting one on the other side
[45:41.300 --> 45:44.300]  And I'm looking at this thinking
[45:44.300 --> 45:47.300]  When he dove in over the first edge
[45:47.300 --> 45:50.300]  He had to already be pulling back on the stick
[45:50.300 --> 45:53.300]  Because the delay in his controls
[45:53.300 --> 45:56.300]  If he's not already pulling back on the stick
[45:56.300 --> 45:59.300]  He's going to hit that other side
[46:00.260 --> 46:03.260]  Those were gutsy guys
[46:03.260 --> 46:06.260]  And you're flying close to the ground
[46:06.260 --> 46:09.260]  That big airplane with air currents moving around
[46:09.260 --> 46:12.260]  These guys are risking their lives
[46:12.260 --> 46:15.260]  And their airplanes
[46:15.260 --> 46:18.260]  Remember too that they're facing
[46:18.260 --> 46:21.260]  60 to 80 mile an hour wind gusts
[46:21.260 --> 46:24.260]  The winds were that bad
[46:24.260 --> 46:27.260]  They're the highest winds that they've seen
[46:28.220 --> 46:31.220]  And Oregon sent down some fire engines
[46:31.220 --> 46:34.220]  But they were stopped in Sacramento
[46:34.220 --> 46:37.220]  Because they didn't have some emissions
[46:37.220 --> 46:40.220]  California emissions
[46:40.220 --> 46:43.220]  I'm watching these guys on these YouTube channels
[46:43.220 --> 46:46.220]  And they keep saying
[46:46.220 --> 46:49.220]  You can't make this stuff up
[46:49.220 --> 46:52.220]  Oregon sends fire trucks down
[46:52.220 --> 46:55.220]  And the whole city's burning
[46:56.180 --> 46:59.180]  And they want to do smog tests on them
[46:59.180 --> 47:02.180]  What?
[47:02.180 --> 47:05.180]  Yeah, they delayed them
[47:05.180 --> 47:08.180]  Because it's only registered and tested
[47:08.180 --> 47:11.180]  For the levels that are okay in Oregon
[47:11.180 --> 47:14.180]  Not in California, so they're more strict
[47:14.180 --> 47:17.180]  And they can't let the trucks in
[47:17.180 --> 47:20.180]  Unbelievable
[47:20.180 --> 47:23.180]  How insane can he get
[47:24.140 --> 47:27.140]  You see what happened
[47:27.140 --> 47:30.140]  The fire department had apparently requested
[47:30.140 --> 47:33.140]  A budget to increase personnel
[47:33.140 --> 47:36.140]  And to repair fire trucks and do everything
[47:36.140 --> 47:39.140]  Well, the mayor instead reduced their budget
[47:39.140 --> 47:42.140]  And put it towards ostensibly DEI hires
[47:42.140 --> 47:45.140]  And Gavin Newsom
[47:45.140 --> 47:48.140]  And his demonic rat crew
[47:48.140 --> 47:51.140]  They approved millions of dollars
[47:51.140 --> 47:54.140]  To Trump-proof California
[47:54.140 --> 47:57.140]  And some of the celebrities are coming out
[47:57.140 --> 48:00.140]  Saying Trump-proof, why don't you fire-proof it
[48:00.140 --> 48:03.140]  Spend the money to fire-proof, not Trump-proof it
[48:03.140 --> 48:06.140]  Because when you've got people in the Pacific
[48:06.140 --> 48:09.140]  Palisades and Malibu are celebrity enclaves
[48:09.140 --> 48:12.140]  And many, many, many of these
[48:12.140 --> 48:15.140]  So-called celebrities have lost
[48:15.140 --> 48:18.140]  Multi-million dollar homes, raised to ashes
[48:18.140 --> 48:21.140]  And they're actually starting to turn around a little
[48:21.140 --> 48:24.140]  Now you've still got some hardcore Democrats
[48:24.140 --> 48:27.140]  Who say, no, he's doing the best he can
[48:27.140 --> 48:30.140]  And this was nature that did this
[48:30.140 --> 48:33.140]  But it's not, this was this poor management
[48:33.140 --> 48:36.140]  If we had a fire like that in Dallas
[48:36.140 --> 48:39.140]  Yeah, we'd say nature did that
[48:39.140 --> 48:42.140]  Because that doesn't happen in Dallas
[48:42.140 --> 48:45.140]  That happens in California
[48:46.140 --> 48:49.140]  Every year
[48:49.140 --> 48:52.140]  Every year
[48:52.140 --> 48:55.140]  I mean, it's not a question of whether you're going to have these fires
[48:55.140 --> 48:58.140]  You are going to have these fires
[48:58.140 --> 49:01.140]  I don't get it
[49:01.140 --> 49:04.140]  But I think I'm relatively certain
[49:04.140 --> 49:07.140]  At the next interim election
[49:07.140 --> 49:10.140]  California will be about as red as it can get
[49:10.140 --> 49:13.140]  Well, it's already
[49:13.140 --> 49:16.140]  Parts of California have turned really red
[49:16.140 --> 49:19.140]  And I think after this more parts will
[49:19.140 --> 49:22.140]  And it turns out that apparently Trump years ago
[49:22.140 --> 49:25.140]  Told Newsom that he needed to get
[49:25.140 --> 49:28.140]  Control of the brush and start
[49:28.140 --> 49:31.140]  Cleaning that
[49:31.140 --> 49:34.140]  No, Tina, it wasn't years ago, it was two months ago
[49:34.140 --> 49:37.140]  No, he actually did it years ago
[49:37.140 --> 49:40.140]  Two months ago he warned about this
[49:41.140 --> 49:44.140]  And then two months later, boom, it happens
[49:44.140 --> 49:47.140]  Yeah, and it was incredible
[49:47.140 --> 49:50.140]  I know personally of four people
[49:50.140 --> 49:53.140]  That lost their homes
[49:53.140 --> 49:56.140]  And at least six or eight that I know personally
[49:56.140 --> 49:59.140]  Were evacuated and what this has done
[49:59.140 --> 50:02.140]  We already have a bad homeless problem
[50:02.140 --> 50:05.140]  Where are these people going to go?
[50:05.140 --> 50:08.140]  There is not enough housing to house all these people
[50:09.140 --> 50:12.140]  So
[50:12.140 --> 50:15.140]  That's a big problem
[50:15.140 --> 50:18.140]  While this is a horrible thing that happened
[50:18.140 --> 50:21.140]  It may actually turn California
[50:21.140 --> 50:24.140]  Back into a sane state
[50:24.140 --> 50:27.140]  If that's possible
[50:27.140 --> 50:30.140]  But you're looking at people who've lost their businesses
[50:30.140 --> 50:33.140]  People who, the housekeepers, grand keepers
[50:33.140 --> 50:36.140]  All those people who work for these celebrities
[50:36.140 --> 50:39.140]  And for the restaurants that have been shut down
[50:39.140 --> 50:42.140]  They've now lost their jobs and there's no one to
[50:42.140 --> 50:45.140]  They can't get hired anywhere because
[50:45.140 --> 50:48.140]  Everybody's going to try to be rebuilding
[50:48.140 --> 50:51.140]  It's really, really sad
[50:51.140 --> 50:54.140]  It's just a disaster, an absolute unmitigated disaster
[50:57.140 --> 51:00.140]  It's horrible this happened
[51:00.140 --> 51:03.140]  But I hope they learn from it
[51:03.140 --> 51:06.140]  Often
[51:06.140 --> 51:09.140]  Hoping that idiots learn from their experiences
[51:09.140 --> 51:12.140]  Often a fool's gamble
[51:12.140 --> 51:15.140]  Okay, we are proud of you, Tina
[51:15.140 --> 51:18.140]  Thank you
[51:18.140 --> 51:21.140]  I think you'll be getting a lot more people coming to Texas now
[51:21.140 --> 51:24.140]  We're getting too many now
[51:24.140 --> 51:27.140]  I'm in a small town
[51:27.140 --> 51:30.140]  And I pulled up to the main road
[51:30.140 --> 51:33.140]  I pulled out and this guy charged up
[51:33.140 --> 51:36.140]  To block me, shove me off on the shoulder
[51:36.140 --> 51:39.140]  And there's no other cars on the road
[51:39.140 --> 51:42.140]  And go back to California
[51:42.140 --> 51:45.140]  We don't generally drive that way here in Texas
[51:48.140 --> 51:51.140]  It's getting to where I can't use my blinker
[51:51.140 --> 51:54.140]  If I turn on my blinker to change lanes
[51:54.140 --> 51:57.140]  We have so many people from California
[51:57.140 --> 52:00.140]  And New York and Chicago
[52:00.140 --> 52:03.140]  They'll run up and block you
[52:03.140 --> 52:06.140]  Just last week I was
[52:06.140 --> 52:09.140]  In traffic and I put on my blinker
[52:09.140 --> 52:12.140]  This guy's way back there and he stomped on the gas
[52:12.140 --> 52:15.140]  I turned in front of him and I was about 30 degrees
[52:15.140 --> 52:18.140]  And I stopped in the highway
[52:18.140 --> 52:21.140]  Looked over my shoulder at him
[52:21.140 --> 52:24.140]  He's sitting there stopped in the roadway
[52:24.140 --> 52:27.140]  He looked like he thought I was going to get out
[52:27.140 --> 52:30.140]  And rip him out of his window
[52:33.140 --> 52:36.140]  We were proposing to put a sign
[52:36.140 --> 52:39.140]  At the New Mexico border
[52:39.140 --> 52:42.140]  Welcoming people from California
[52:42.140 --> 52:45.140]  But asking them not to stop
[52:45.140 --> 52:48.140]  Until they passed Orange
[52:49.140 --> 52:52.140]  Orange is about 10 miles from
[52:52.140 --> 52:55.140]  Louisiana
[52:55.140 --> 52:58.140]  I don't blame you
[52:58.140 --> 53:01.140]  You don't mind people coming in
[53:01.140 --> 53:04.140]  But leave that California attitude at home
[53:04.140 --> 53:07.140]  When I first came down here
[53:07.140 --> 53:10.140]  If you broke down on the side of the highway
[53:10.140 --> 53:13.140]  In five minutes somebody would have pulled over
[53:13.140 --> 53:16.140]  I never broke down
[53:16.140 --> 53:19.140]  I have a number more people stopping to help me
[53:19.140 --> 53:22.140]  Than I could use and they often got in the way
[53:22.140 --> 53:25.140]  Because I had to explain to them
[53:25.140 --> 53:28.140]  I didn't need their help but more people than I could get to
[53:28.140 --> 53:31.140]  And
[53:31.140 --> 53:34.140]  A guy shoots his girlfriend
[53:34.140 --> 53:37.140]  At the Valley View Mall
[53:37.140 --> 53:40.140]  He chased her down the sidewalk outside the mall
[53:40.140 --> 53:43.140]  And shot her in the back of the head
[53:43.140 --> 53:46.140]  And somebody blew out his femoral artery
[53:46.140 --> 53:49.140]  He bled out six blocks away
[53:49.140 --> 53:52.140]  It's Texas
[53:52.140 --> 53:55.140]  You don't mess with women in Texas
[53:55.140 --> 53:58.140]  Somebody will beat you up
[53:58.140 --> 54:01.140]  The police asked for two weeks for whoever did this
[54:01.140 --> 54:04.140]  To come in and bring in your weapon
[54:04.140 --> 54:07.140]  The Xerox salesman shows up
[54:07.140 --> 54:10.140]  44 Mag, when I heard the story
[54:10.140 --> 54:13.140]  He came out of the car
[54:13.140 --> 54:16.140]  But didn't account for acceleration
[54:16.140 --> 54:19.140]  He hesitated and the car moved out from front of his weapon
[54:19.140 --> 54:22.140]  And he blew a hole through the door
[54:22.140 --> 54:25.140]  And blew out this guy's femoral artery
[54:25.140 --> 54:28.140]  So they take the gun
[54:28.140 --> 54:31.140]  They go back and check it and they come back and said
[54:31.140 --> 54:34.140]  Yep, that's the one that killed him alright
[54:34.140 --> 54:37.140]  Gave it back to him and sent him home
[54:37.140 --> 54:40.140]  You have the right to protect your property
[54:40.140 --> 54:43.140]  And your person, you have the right to use force
[54:43.140 --> 54:46.140]  You have the right to use deadly force
[54:46.140 --> 54:49.140]  You also have the right
[54:49.140 --> 54:52.140]  To protect the property and the person of another
[54:52.140 --> 54:55.140]  As if it were your own
[54:55.140 --> 54:58.140]  And we have
[54:58.140 --> 55:01.140]  Good Samaritan law
[55:01.140 --> 55:04.140]  If I try to help you and do everything wrong
[55:04.140 --> 55:07.140]  You absolutely cannot be sued
[55:07.140 --> 55:10.140]  Period
[55:10.140 --> 55:13.140]  So you're safe to try to help people
[55:13.140 --> 55:16.140]  In Texas
[55:16.140 --> 55:19.140]  Unlike it was in Chicago, hang on Randy Kelton
[55:19.140 --> 55:22.140]  A little bit earlier
[55:22.140 --> 55:25.140]  I came back from Vietnam
[55:25.140 --> 55:28.140]  I was back in country two days
[55:28.140 --> 55:31.140]  Downtown Chicago, state Madison
[55:31.140 --> 55:34.140]  And I looked around and thinking
[55:34.140 --> 55:37.140]  This is the scariest place on earth
[55:37.140 --> 55:40.140]  I could fall down here and die
[55:40.140 --> 55:43.140]  And these people step over me
[55:43.140 --> 55:46.140]  The worst part is it would break their hearts
[55:46.140 --> 55:49.140]  They'd be afraid to try to help me
[55:49.140 --> 55:52.140]  That's why I came to Texas
[55:52.140 --> 55:55.140]  We'll be right back
[56:01.140 --> 56:04.140]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today
[56:04.140 --> 56:07.140]  It's an accurate translation
[56:07.140 --> 56:10.140]  And it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God
[56:10.140 --> 56:13.140]  And to know the meaning of life
[56:13.140 --> 56:16.140]  The free books are a three volume set called
[56:16.140 --> 56:19.140]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:19.140 --> 56:22.140]  Chapter by chapter Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents
[56:22.140 --> 56:25.140]  God's plan of salvation
[56:25.140 --> 56:28.140]  Growing in Christ and how to build up the church
[56:28.140 --> 56:31.140]  The New Testament Recovery Version
[56:31.140 --> 56:34.140]  And Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:34.140 --> 56:37.140]  Call Bibles for America toll free
[56:37.140 --> 56:40.140]  At 888-551-0102
[56:40.140 --> 56:43.140]  That's 888-551-0102
[56:43.140 --> 56:46.140]  Or visit us online
[56:46.140 --> 56:49.140]  At bfa.org
[56:59.140 --> 57:02.140]  The Bill of Rights contains
[57:02.140 --> 57:05.140]  The first ten amendments of our Constitution
[57:05.140 --> 57:08.140]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[57:08.140 --> 57:11.140]  Our liberty depends on it
[57:11.140 --> 57:14.140]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[57:14.140 --> 57:17.140]  To remember one of your constitutional rights
[57:17.140 --> 57:20.140]  Privacy is under attack
[57:20.140 --> 57:23.140]  When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[57:23.140 --> 57:26.140]  And once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[57:26.140 --> 57:29.140]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[57:29.140 --> 57:32.140]  And keep your information to yourself
[57:32.140 --> 57:35.140]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[57:35.140 --> 57:38.140]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[57:38.140 --> 57:41.140]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bin
[57:41.140 --> 57:44.140]  Start over with Startpage
[57:44.140 --> 57:47.140]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed
[57:47.140 --> 57:50.140]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there
[57:50.140 --> 57:53.140]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight
[57:53.140 --> 57:56.140]  That shocking image of a third party in my parent's bed
[57:56.140 --> 57:59.140]  Reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent
[57:59.140 --> 58:02.140]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers
[58:02.140 --> 58:05.140]  A common demand in the days of our founding fathers
[58:05.140 --> 58:08.140]  Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[58:08.140 --> 58:11.140]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging
[58:11.140 --> 58:14.140]  Tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights
[58:14.140 --> 58:17.140]  And re-read the Third Amendment
[58:17.140 --> 58:20.140]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[58:23.140 --> 58:26.140]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[58:26.140 --> 58:29.140]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[58:29.140 --> 58:32.140]  Our liberty depends on it
[58:32.140 --> 58:35.140]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[58:35.140 --> 58:38.140]  To remember one of your constitutional rights
[58:38.140 --> 58:41.140]  Privacy is under attack
[58:41.140 --> 58:44.140]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[58:44.140 --> 58:47.140]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll never get it back again
[58:47.140 --> 58:50.140]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll never get it back again
[58:50.140 --> 58:53.140]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll never get it back again
[58:53.140 --> 58:56.140]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[58:56.140 --> 58:59.140]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[58:59.140 --> 59:02.140]  And keep your information to yourself
[59:02.140 --> 59:05.140]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[59:05.140 --> 59:08.140]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[59:08.140 --> 59:11.140]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[59:11.140 --> 59:14.140]  Start over with StartPage
[59:14.140 --> 59:17.140]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars
[59:17.140 --> 59:20.140]  A magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles
[59:20.140 --> 59:23.140]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans
[59:23.140 --> 59:26.140]  Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure
[59:26.140 --> 59:29.140]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[59:29.140 --> 59:32.140]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[59:32.140 --> 59:35.140]  In the name of security
[59:35.140 --> 59:38.140]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing
[59:38.140 --> 59:41.140]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates
[59:41.140 --> 59:44.140]  Without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells
[59:45.140 --> 59:48.140]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[59:48.140 --> 59:51.140]  And use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth
[59:51.140 --> 59:54.140]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[59:54.140 --> 59:57.140]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:00:14.140 --> 01:00:17.140]  Okay, we are back
[01:00:17.140 --> 01:00:20.140]  Randy Kelton, Barrett Fountain, VoodooVlog Radio
[01:00:20.140 --> 01:00:23.140]  And we're talking to Tina
[01:00:23.140 --> 01:00:26.140]  Tina, are we about done with you?
[01:00:26.140 --> 01:00:29.140]  Yeah, we're about done with you
[01:00:29.140 --> 01:00:32.140]  Okay, we're about done with you
[01:00:32.140 --> 01:00:35.140]  Okay, we're about done with you
[01:00:35.140 --> 01:00:38.140]  Okay, we're about done with you
[01:00:38.140 --> 01:00:41.140]  Okay, we're about done with you
[01:00:41.140 --> 01:00:44.140]  We're talking to Tina
[01:00:44.140 --> 01:00:47.140]  Tina, are we about done with you?
[01:00:47.140 --> 01:00:50.140]  Yes, I just wanted to mention one thing
[01:00:50.140 --> 01:00:53.140]  I'm in the midst of writing a motion to the bankruptcy court
[01:00:53.140 --> 01:00:56.140]  To ask them if they will bar these debtors
[01:00:56.140 --> 01:00:59.140]  From ever filing another bankruptcy for at least 10 years
[01:00:59.140 --> 01:01:02.140]  I don't know if it'll go through
[01:01:02.140 --> 01:01:05.140]  But I'm just saying they've abused the bankruptcy system
[01:01:05.140 --> 01:01:08.140]  And I'm going to write it anyway and see what happens
[01:01:08.140 --> 01:01:11.140]  Good
[01:01:11.140 --> 01:01:14.140]  And I don't ever want you after me
[01:01:14.140 --> 01:01:17.140]  Well, same goes here
[01:01:17.140 --> 01:01:20.140]  I don't want you after me, Albrecht
[01:01:20.140 --> 01:01:23.140]  Tenacious
[01:01:23.140 --> 01:01:26.140]  Okay, thank you, tenacious Tina
[01:01:26.140 --> 01:01:29.140]  Okay, now we're going to go to Alex in California
[01:01:29.140 --> 01:01:32.140]  Hello, Alex
[01:01:32.140 --> 01:01:35.140]  What do you have for us today?
[01:01:35.140 --> 01:01:38.140]  Okay, so I was thinking
[01:01:38.140 --> 01:01:41.140]  Okay, so I was thinking
[01:01:41.140 --> 01:01:44.140]  To avoid or to better manage
[01:01:44.140 --> 01:01:47.140]  To avoid or to better manage
[01:01:47.140 --> 01:01:50.140]  With my action against the judges
[01:01:50.140 --> 01:01:53.140]  With my action against the judges
[01:01:53.140 --> 01:01:56.140]  To overcome all these unlawful immunity doctrines
[01:01:56.140 --> 01:01:59.140]  To overcome all these unlawful immunity doctrines
[01:01:59.140 --> 01:02:02.140]  And whatever else they have
[01:02:02.140 --> 01:02:05.140]  Because I've been looking into
[01:02:05.140 --> 01:02:08.140]  Common law, common law claims versus
[01:02:08.140 --> 01:02:11.140]  Civil law
[01:02:11.140 --> 01:02:14.140]  And I came across
[01:02:14.140 --> 01:02:17.140]  And I've only like gathered a little bit about it
[01:02:17.140 --> 01:02:20.140]  And I just wanted to present that
[01:02:20.140 --> 01:02:23.140]  To you guys and see if you have any input
[01:02:23.140 --> 01:02:26.140]  And basically my intent is
[01:02:26.140 --> 01:02:29.140]  And basically my intent is
[01:02:29.140 --> 01:02:32.140]  If I make the 42, 1983
[01:02:32.140 --> 01:02:35.140]  A cause of action
[01:02:35.140 --> 01:02:38.140]  Then they will have all their case law
[01:02:38.140 --> 01:02:41.140]  That they will try to apply
[01:02:41.140 --> 01:02:44.140]  That will bulldoze me just like
[01:02:44.140 --> 01:02:47.140]  They do with you guys and other people
[01:02:47.140 --> 01:02:50.140]  And if I
[01:02:50.140 --> 01:02:53.140]  If I prevent them
[01:02:53.140 --> 01:02:56.140]  From application of it
[01:02:56.140 --> 01:02:59.140]  Then they actually would have to assess my claims
[01:02:59.140 --> 01:03:02.140]  Hopefully through the eyes of
[01:03:02.140 --> 01:03:05.140]  The constitution
[01:03:05.140 --> 01:03:08.140]  So for example, there is a common law
[01:03:08.140 --> 01:03:11.140]  Trespass on the case claim
[01:03:11.140 --> 01:03:14.140]  Which would be an injury without violence
[01:03:14.140 --> 01:03:17.140]  So that common law trespass on the case
[01:03:17.140 --> 01:03:20.140]  And if I would
[01:03:20.140 --> 01:03:23.140]  Where do you find this common law
[01:03:23.140 --> 01:03:26.140]  You're breaking up
[01:03:33.140 --> 01:03:36.140]  You're breaking up
[01:03:42.140 --> 01:03:45.140]  Alex, we're not able to hear you very well
[01:03:45.140 --> 01:03:48.140]  We're only hearing one syllable out of every two words
[01:03:48.140 --> 01:03:51.140]  If you can make some adjustments
[01:03:51.140 --> 01:03:54.140]  On your network there
[01:03:54.140 --> 01:03:57.140]  I know that sounds broad, but
[01:03:57.140 --> 01:04:00.140]  It seems like a lot of packet loss
[01:04:00.140 --> 01:04:03.140]  Do you have a lot of devices streaming video near you
[01:04:03.140 --> 01:04:06.140]  Or something where you can
[01:04:06.140 --> 01:04:09.140]  Either shut those down or get on your own link
[01:04:09.140 --> 01:04:12.140]  Because we're not able to hear you
[01:04:12.140 --> 01:04:15.140]  I have a suggestion
[01:04:15.140 --> 01:04:18.140]  Hold on
[01:04:18.140 --> 01:04:21.140]  Stand on your head and just walk in like a chicken
[01:04:21.140 --> 01:04:24.140]  It might not work, but it'd be entertaining
[01:04:24.140 --> 01:04:27.140]  Sorry, what was that?
[01:04:27.140 --> 01:04:30.140]  What was that?
[01:04:30.140 --> 01:04:33.140]  That's better, that's better
[01:04:33.140 --> 01:04:36.140]  That's better, thank you
[01:04:36.140 --> 01:04:39.140]  See, just stand on your head and just walk in like a chicken's working
[01:04:39.140 --> 01:04:42.140]  Okay, is it still better
[01:04:42.140 --> 01:04:45.140]  Because then I'll stay here
[01:04:45.140 --> 01:04:48.140]  Okay
[01:04:48.140 --> 01:04:51.140]  So should I
[01:04:51.140 --> 01:04:54.140]  Repeat everything or
[01:04:54.140 --> 01:04:57.140]  Yes, whatever you were saying
[01:04:57.140 --> 01:05:00.140]  We couldn't make sense of it
[01:05:00.140 --> 01:05:03.140]  We were asking where this common law is at
[01:05:03.140 --> 01:05:06.140]  No, I wasn't
[01:05:06.140 --> 01:05:09.140]  Okay, so basically
[01:05:09.140 --> 01:05:12.140]  I want to present you guys with current knowledge
[01:05:12.140 --> 01:05:15.140]  And see if you happen to have any more inputs
[01:05:15.140 --> 01:05:18.140]  And what I'm trying to do is
[01:05:18.140 --> 01:05:21.140]  To prevent them
[01:05:21.140 --> 01:05:24.140]  Because I filed in 1983 against judges
[01:05:24.140 --> 01:05:27.140]  So they obviously come back with judicial immunity
[01:05:27.140 --> 01:05:30.140]  And there's so much case law on this
[01:05:30.140 --> 01:05:33.140]  On this unlawful doctrine
[01:05:33.140 --> 01:05:36.140]  So I'm trying to prevent them to be able
[01:05:36.140 --> 01:05:39.140]  To even use all this
[01:05:39.140 --> 01:05:42.140]  From what I see
[01:05:42.140 --> 01:05:45.140]  From what you guys tried
[01:05:45.140 --> 01:05:48.140]  And what other people tried
[01:05:48.140 --> 01:05:51.140]  They just bulldozed us with their stupid doctrines
[01:05:51.140 --> 01:05:54.140]  And we
[01:05:54.140 --> 01:05:57.140]  To get them to be accountable
[01:05:57.140 --> 01:06:00.140]  And to answer to their actions
[01:06:00.140 --> 01:06:03.140]  So I'm trying to use a strategy
[01:06:03.140 --> 01:06:06.140]  So I was looking into the differences between
[01:06:06.140 --> 01:06:09.140]  Okay
[01:06:09.140 --> 01:06:12.140]  Where are you finding
[01:06:12.140 --> 01:06:15.140]  Information on a common law action
[01:06:21.140 --> 01:06:24.140]  Hold on
[01:06:27.140 --> 01:06:30.140]  Problem is
[01:06:30.140 --> 01:06:33.140]  I've been doing this for over 30 years
[01:06:33.140 --> 01:06:36.140]  I have never ever
[01:06:36.140 --> 01:06:39.140]  Been able to find common law
[01:06:39.140 --> 01:06:42.140]  So
[01:06:42.140 --> 01:06:45.140]  Can you find it? I haven't
[01:06:45.140 --> 01:06:48.140]  Okay
[01:06:48.140 --> 01:06:51.140]  So basically I started with
[01:06:56.140 --> 01:06:59.140]  You're breaking up again
[01:06:59.140 --> 01:07:02.140]  Okay let me
[01:07:02.140 --> 01:07:05.140]  Let me put in the headset
[01:07:13.140 --> 01:07:16.140]  Is this any different?
[01:07:16.140 --> 01:07:19.140]  It's a little more muffled
[01:07:19.140 --> 01:07:22.140]  The headset's not likely to help you with losing packets
[01:07:22.140 --> 01:07:25.140]  But go ahead
[01:07:25.140 --> 01:07:28.140]  Okay
[01:07:28.140 --> 01:07:31.140]  So
[01:07:31.140 --> 01:07:34.140]  The difference between the common
[01:07:34.140 --> 01:07:37.140]  And the civil law is actually
[01:07:37.140 --> 01:07:40.140]  In the constitution in multiple places
[01:07:40.140 --> 01:07:43.140]  Where they distinguish
[01:07:43.140 --> 01:07:46.140]  A case in law
[01:07:46.140 --> 01:07:49.140]  And in equity
[01:07:49.140 --> 01:07:52.140]  So equity is that civil statutory realm
[01:07:52.140 --> 01:07:55.140]  And common law is the common law
[01:07:55.140 --> 01:07:58.140]  No no no common law is the common law
[01:07:58.140 --> 01:08:01.140]  I get all these people telling me about the common law
[01:08:01.140 --> 01:08:04.140]  I can't come into court with something
[01:08:04.140 --> 01:08:07.140]  I just pulled out of the thin air
[01:08:07.140 --> 01:08:10.140]  Where is common law and how does it
[01:08:10.140 --> 01:08:13.140]  Get authority
[01:08:16.140 --> 01:08:19.140]  I stole what I found out
[01:08:19.140 --> 01:08:22.140]  So our common law comes from through the Magna Carta
[01:08:22.140 --> 01:08:25.140]  Basically
[01:08:25.140 --> 01:08:28.140]  Let's talk about the Magna Carta
[01:08:28.140 --> 01:08:31.140]  The Magna Carta
[01:08:31.140 --> 01:08:34.140]  1215 AD
[01:08:34.140 --> 01:08:37.140]  We had a number of dukes
[01:08:37.140 --> 01:08:40.140]  Who were essentially sovereign over the lands
[01:08:40.140 --> 01:08:43.140]  They could protect
[01:08:43.140 --> 01:08:46.140]  And they had a set of law
[01:08:46.140 --> 01:08:49.140]  That was the general law
[01:08:49.140 --> 01:08:52.140]  The general customs
[01:08:52.140 --> 01:08:55.140]  Methods that everyone
[01:08:55.140 --> 01:08:58.140]  Tended to agree to
[01:08:58.140 --> 01:09:01.140]  That was the common law
[01:09:01.140 --> 01:09:04.140]  It wasn't a written law
[01:09:04.140 --> 01:09:07.140]  It was what everyone did
[01:09:07.140 --> 01:09:10.140]  It started out with a good example
[01:09:10.140 --> 01:09:13.140]  Of the vikings
[01:09:13.140 --> 01:09:16.140]  In one of these series on vikings
[01:09:16.140 --> 01:09:19.140]  He attacks this place
[01:09:19.140 --> 01:09:22.140]  And the other clansman's brother
[01:09:22.140 --> 01:09:25.140]  Ahead of it tried to rape
[01:09:25.140 --> 01:09:28.140]  The main guy's wife and she killed him
[01:09:28.140 --> 01:09:31.140]  He's concerned for her
[01:09:31.140 --> 01:09:34.140]  So he claims he killed him
[01:09:34.140 --> 01:09:37.140]  And they bring him before the entire clan
[01:09:37.140 --> 01:09:40.140]  Both sides make their case
[01:09:40.140 --> 01:09:43.140]  And the clan decides
[01:09:43.140 --> 01:09:46.140]  What will be done based on
[01:09:46.140 --> 01:09:49.140]  Their beliefs and their traditions
[01:09:49.140 --> 01:09:52.140]  That's the common law
[01:09:52.140 --> 01:09:55.140]  And then we got the Magna Carta
[01:09:55.140 --> 01:09:58.140]  The Magna Carta referenced
[01:09:58.140 --> 01:10:01.140]  The common law that all these dukes
[01:10:01.140 --> 01:10:04.140]  Used what the people believed was right
[01:10:04.140 --> 01:10:07.140]  That's what the common law was
[01:10:07.140 --> 01:10:10.140]  And in the Magna Carta it says
[01:10:10.140 --> 01:10:13.140]  That the magistrates
[01:10:13.140 --> 01:10:16.140]  Not the king, the aristocracy
[01:10:16.140 --> 01:10:19.140]  Passes an edict
[01:10:19.140 --> 01:10:22.140]  And it is offensive to the common law
[01:10:22.140 --> 01:10:25.140]  The magistrates may not enforce it
[01:10:25.140 --> 01:10:28.140]  That's where I think they're getting
[01:10:28.140 --> 01:10:31.140]  This claim of common law
[01:10:31.140 --> 01:10:34.140]  The common law was laid down in the Magna Carta
[01:10:34.140 --> 01:10:37.140]  And the charter of the forest
[01:10:37.140 --> 01:10:40.140]  The charter of the forest really laid down
[01:10:40.140 --> 01:10:43.140]  But when we came to the US
[01:10:43.140 --> 01:10:46.140]  We adopted a constitution
[01:10:46.140 --> 01:10:49.140]  And the constitution
[01:10:49.140 --> 01:10:52.140]  Created a legislature for us
[01:10:52.140 --> 01:10:55.140]  It was our legislature empowered by us
[01:10:55.140 --> 01:10:58.140]  And we had our legislature
[01:10:58.140 --> 01:11:01.140]  Write laws for us
[01:11:01.140 --> 01:11:04.140]  And then we had our legislature
[01:11:04.140 --> 01:11:07.140]  Create courts
[01:11:07.140 --> 01:11:10.140]  And those courts were empowered
[01:11:10.140 --> 01:11:13.140]  To enforce our law for us
[01:11:15.140 --> 01:11:18.140]  Now we have somebody saying
[01:11:18.140 --> 01:11:21.140]  There's this common law out there
[01:11:21.140 --> 01:11:24.140]  It's not written down anywhere
[01:11:24.140 --> 01:11:27.140]  It's just whatever I pull out of the
[01:11:27.140 --> 01:11:30.140]  Clear blue sky and call common law
[01:11:30.140 --> 01:11:33.140]  I expect you to treat that as if
[01:11:33.140 --> 01:11:36.140]  It is law
[01:11:36.140 --> 01:11:39.140]  I'm not buying that story
[01:11:39.140 --> 01:11:42.140]  The only thing that approaches
[01:11:42.140 --> 01:11:45.140]  What is left over of the common law
[01:11:45.140 --> 01:11:48.140]  Is the Magna Carta
[01:11:48.140 --> 01:11:51.140]  Instead of bringing an issue
[01:11:51.140 --> 01:11:54.140]  In controversy to the whole clan
[01:11:54.140 --> 01:11:57.140]  They selected representative
[01:11:57.140 --> 01:12:00.140]  Members of the clan
[01:12:00.140 --> 01:12:03.140]  To hear the controversy
[01:12:03.140 --> 01:12:06.140]  And what this group ruled
[01:12:06.140 --> 01:12:09.140]  What they decided ruled
[01:12:12.140 --> 01:12:15.140]  The king could not overrule
[01:12:15.140 --> 01:12:18.140]  Common law jury
[01:12:18.140 --> 01:12:21.140]  And as we developed
[01:12:21.140 --> 01:12:24.140]  We kept the jury
[01:12:24.140 --> 01:12:27.140]  Jefferson said
[01:12:27.140 --> 01:12:30.140]  The primary defense against bad law
[01:12:30.140 --> 01:12:33.140]  Is a jury who will not enforce law
[01:12:33.140 --> 01:12:36.140]  The courts want to say
[01:12:36.140 --> 01:12:39.140]  That the jury determines the fact
[01:12:39.140 --> 01:12:42.140]  And the court determines the law
[01:12:42.140 --> 01:12:45.140]  No, they don't
[01:12:45.140 --> 01:12:48.140]  The court can notice the jury
[01:12:48.140 --> 01:12:51.140]  Of what the law is
[01:12:51.140 --> 01:12:54.140]  But the jury can do whatever
[01:12:54.140 --> 01:12:57.140]  It chooses
[01:12:57.140 --> 01:12:59.140]  That is the remnant that's left over from the common law
[01:12:59.140 --> 01:13:02.140]  It's what the jury decides
[01:13:02.140 --> 01:13:05.140]  Not what the judges decide
[01:13:05.140 --> 01:13:08.140]  So if there's anything that is common law
[01:13:08.140 --> 01:13:11.140]  It's determinations by juries
[01:13:11.140 --> 01:13:14.140]  But as to common law courts
[01:13:14.140 --> 01:13:17.140]  And common law juries
[01:13:17.140 --> 01:13:20.140]  There is nothing in law anywhere
[01:13:20.140 --> 01:13:23.140]  In American law that establishes
[01:13:23.140 --> 01:13:26.140]  Common law courts and common law juries
[01:13:26.140 --> 01:13:29.140]  So I can't go into a court and say
[01:13:29.140 --> 01:13:32.140]  You have to follow this
[01:13:32.140 --> 01:13:35.140]  Now, got guys that have common law rulings
[01:13:35.140 --> 01:13:38.140]  That the courts are upholding
[01:13:38.140 --> 01:13:41.140]  And I'm trying to figure out how that happens
[01:13:41.140 --> 01:13:44.140]  Because nobody can tell me how to convene
[01:13:44.140 --> 01:13:47.140]  Common law court
[01:13:47.140 --> 01:13:50.140]  How to impanel a common law jury
[01:13:50.140 --> 01:13:53.140]  And how to get a ruling from one
[01:13:53.140 --> 01:13:56.140]  Been working on it 30 years, ain't found it yet
[01:13:56.140 --> 01:13:59.140]  We'll be right back
[01:14:23.140 --> 01:14:26.140]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[01:14:26.140 --> 01:14:29.140]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[01:14:29.140 --> 01:14:32.140]  How to turn the financial tables on them
[01:14:32.140 --> 01:14:35.140]  And make them pay you to go away
[01:14:35.140 --> 01:14:38.140]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution
[01:14:38.140 --> 01:14:41.140]  For how to stop debt collectors
[01:14:41.140 --> 01:14:44.140]  Personal consultation is available as well
[01:14:44.140 --> 01:14:47.140]  For more information please visit
[01:14:47.140 --> 01:14:50.140]  And click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:14:50.140 --> 01:14:53.140]  Or email
[01:14:56.140 --> 01:14:59.140]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:14:59.140 --> 01:15:02.140]  I love logos, without the shows on this network
[01:15:02.140 --> 01:15:05.140]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends
[01:15:05.140 --> 01:15:08.140]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back
[01:15:08.140 --> 01:15:11.140]  I need my truth fixed, I'd be lost without logos
[01:15:11.140 --> 01:15:14.140]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air
[01:15:14.140 --> 01:15:17.140]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:15:17.140 --> 01:15:20.140]  I give because I spend it all on supplements
[01:15:20.140 --> 01:15:23.140]  How can I help logos?
[01:15:23.140 --> 01:15:26.140]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon
[01:15:26.140 --> 01:15:29.140]  You can help logos. You can order your supplies or holiday gifts
[01:15:29.140 --> 01:15:32.140]  First thing you do is clear your cookies
[01:15:32.140 --> 01:15:35.140]  Now go to logosradionetwork.com
[01:15:35.140 --> 01:15:38.140]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it
[01:15:38.140 --> 01:15:41.140]  Now when you order anything from Amazon
[01:15:41.140 --> 01:15:44.140]  You use that link and logos gets a few pesos
[01:15:44.140 --> 01:15:46.140]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:15:46.140 --> 01:15:47.140]  No!
[01:15:47.140 --> 01:15:48.140]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:15:48.140 --> 01:15:50.140]  No! I mean yes!
[01:15:50.140 --> 01:15:53.140]  Wow! Giving without doing anything or spending any money
[01:15:53.140 --> 01:15:56.140]  This is perfect! Thank you so much!
[01:15:56.140 --> 01:15:57.140]  We are welcome!
[01:15:57.140 --> 01:15:59.140]  Happy Holidays Logos!
[01:16:14.140 --> 01:16:19.140]  Ain't gonna blind me
[01:16:19.140 --> 01:16:26.140]  Don't bore me
[01:16:26.140 --> 01:16:30.140]  Well
[01:16:30.140 --> 01:16:35.140]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:35.140 --> 01:16:40.140]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan
[01:16:40.140 --> 01:16:43.140]  You put the fear in my pocket
[01:16:43.140 --> 01:16:45.140]  Stook the money from my hand
[01:16:45.140 --> 01:16:50.140]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:50.140 --> 01:16:55.140]  I ain't gonna fool me
[01:16:55.140 --> 01:16:58.140]  Okay! We are back!
[01:16:58.140 --> 01:17:01.140]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheelabla Radio
[01:17:01.140 --> 01:17:08.140]  On this Friday, the 17th day of January 2025
[01:17:08.140 --> 01:17:12.140]  And we're talking to Alex in California
[01:17:12.140 --> 01:17:15.140]  And Alex, I didn't mean to take that over
[01:17:15.140 --> 01:17:19.140]  But when you're speaking to the common law
[01:17:19.140 --> 01:17:23.140]  You're speaking to one of our pet peeves
[01:17:23.140 --> 01:17:30.140]  It is my opinion that feds put out this notion of common law
[01:17:30.140 --> 01:17:36.140]  To discredit the legal reform community
[01:17:36.140 --> 01:17:40.140]  And they did a really good job
[01:17:40.140 --> 01:17:44.140]  I have been called all over the country to get people out of jail
[01:17:44.140 --> 01:17:49.140]  For following the common law
[01:17:49.140 --> 01:17:54.140]  If you try to do that, you're gonna have problems
[01:17:54.140 --> 01:18:01.140]  So then I'm not fully, I'm actually not fully following
[01:18:01.140 --> 01:18:09.140]  Because, for example, the common law is mentioned a lot in rulings
[01:18:09.140 --> 01:18:14.140]  And I agree, I'm not really sure how to convene a common law court
[01:18:14.140 --> 01:18:16.140]  I don't know that either yet
[01:18:16.140 --> 01:18:18.140]  And I don't know if it's any different
[01:18:18.140 --> 01:18:21.140]  But that's not what I'm trying to do
[01:18:21.140 --> 01:18:25.140]  But to go back to what I wanted to say
[01:18:25.140 --> 01:18:30.140]  Common law is referenced in a lot of doctrines
[01:18:30.140 --> 01:18:33.140]  Especially in the immunity doctrine
[01:18:33.140 --> 01:18:38.140]  It is titled as common law immunity
[01:18:38.140 --> 01:18:41.140]  That's literally what it says, common law immunity
[01:18:41.140 --> 01:18:50.140]  And this is where the, I think this is where only the judges' absolute immunity comes from
[01:18:50.140 --> 01:18:56.140]  Not the qualified immunity, but the judicial immunity does have
[01:18:56.140 --> 01:19:02.140]  In their language, common law, derived from the common law
[01:19:02.140 --> 01:19:07.140]  That's because the legislature never spoke to immunity
[01:19:07.140 --> 01:19:14.140]  And this notion of common law immunity, they should talk to King John about that
[01:19:14.140 --> 01:19:19.140]  No, the court, in their rulings, in their...
[01:19:19.140 --> 01:19:23.140]  They were gonna cut King John's head off
[01:19:23.140 --> 01:19:31.140]  Randy's saying that these judges who pretend to be immune ought to see what King John thought about that
[01:19:31.140 --> 01:19:33.140]  They were gonna cut his head off
[01:19:33.140 --> 01:19:36.140]  So much for immunity and the common law
[01:19:36.140 --> 01:19:39.140]  There wasn't any, never has been any
[01:19:39.140 --> 01:19:46.140]  The immunity they're calling common law is immunity created by judges
[01:19:46.140 --> 01:19:48.140]  Yes, exactly
[01:19:48.140 --> 01:19:59.140]  We just had a federal judge in Mississippi rule that there is no immunity known to federal law
[01:19:59.140 --> 01:20:05.140]  No, he said there is no basis in law for qualified immunity
[01:20:05.140 --> 01:20:11.140]  I got your email, I think I know which suit you're talking about, but that was for qualified immunity
[01:20:11.140 --> 01:20:15.140]  That was not for judicial immunity
[01:20:16.140 --> 01:20:27.140]  There's nothing, there's nothing in law other than judicial determinations that address judicial immunity
[01:20:27.140 --> 01:20:29.140]  Nothing
[01:20:29.140 --> 01:20:31.140]  Judges made it up
[01:20:31.140 --> 01:20:33.140]  Yeah, yeah, exactly
[01:20:33.140 --> 01:20:39.140]  So my point is, because you said that common law isn't mentioned anywhere
[01:20:39.140 --> 01:20:45.140]  And I wanted to say that it is mentioned when they invent these doctrines
[01:20:45.140 --> 01:20:48.140]  So they do recognize the common law
[01:20:48.140 --> 01:20:59.140]  And also it was actually mentioned when you follow the 42 USC 1983
[01:20:59.140 --> 01:21:05.140]  And it was worded differently, there was the notwithstanding clause in it
[01:21:05.140 --> 01:21:15.140]  And then it was taken out and the notwithstanding clause had the language of custom and usage
[01:21:15.140 --> 01:21:21.140]  And custom and usage is basically common law, that's what that stood for
[01:21:21.140 --> 01:21:26.140]  So it is recognized, that's my point
[01:21:26.140 --> 01:21:32.140]  It's not that it's not out there, it is actually there
[01:21:32.140 --> 01:21:38.140]  Yeah, well there are references to it there
[01:21:38.140 --> 01:21:43.140]  But I can't find it actually being there
[01:21:43.140 --> 01:21:51.140]  These judges are referencing common law, but they're calling common law decisions that they make
[01:21:51.140 --> 01:21:53.140]  And that's not common law
[01:21:53.140 --> 01:21:57.140]  Yeah, yeah, I got it
[01:21:57.140 --> 01:22:00.140]  Okay, so let me formulate my question
[01:22:00.140 --> 01:22:10.140]  What would happen if I would amend my complaint, I would take out all statutes
[01:22:10.140 --> 01:22:17.140]  And I would just say that this is a common law, trespass on the case claim
[01:22:17.140 --> 01:22:29.140]  And that I am one of the people of the United States of America and of the state that I'm residing in
[01:22:29.140 --> 01:22:42.140]  And that I claim that these two men and these two women have done something that they weren't authorized to do
[01:22:42.140 --> 01:22:50.140]  And then I would describe that and then I would claim that they didn't have permission to do what they did
[01:22:50.140 --> 01:22:56.140]  And that they also were bound to act differently through their oath
[01:22:56.140 --> 01:23:00.140]  Okay, hold on, there's a problem with that
[01:23:00.140 --> 01:23:01.140]  Okay
[01:23:01.140 --> 01:23:07.140]  You're saying they did things that they were not authorized to do, who says?
[01:23:07.140 --> 01:23:12.140]  I say that, I claim that
[01:23:12.140 --> 01:23:25.140]  Okay, Walker V. Packer says a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts
[01:23:25.140 --> 01:23:34.140]  That the judge's only duty in trial court is to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence
[01:23:34.140 --> 01:23:39.140]  Then apply the laws that comes to him to the facts in the case, that's his job
[01:23:39.140 --> 01:23:51.140]  If you go to the court and you give him no specific facts or give him facts and you don't give him specific law that addresses those facts
[01:23:51.140 --> 01:23:55.140]  He doesn't have anything he can rule on
[01:23:55.140 --> 01:24:05.140]  So if you're going to come in there with the common law, you have to give him specification as to what is the common law
[01:24:05.140 --> 01:24:16.140]  And how he is to address, apply the facts to that law or that law to the facts
[01:24:16.140 --> 01:24:21.140]  But I can't find any common law, it's just some ethereal thing
[01:24:21.140 --> 01:24:28.140]  That each person makes up to fit their own particular circumstance
[01:24:28.140 --> 01:24:35.140]  So I would come in, I would present their oath for the constitution, I would present the constitution
[01:24:35.140 --> 01:24:46.140]  I would present myself as one of the people that invested these men and women with those specific limited powers
[01:24:46.140 --> 01:24:51.140]  And I would claim that he didn't have the power to do what he did
[01:24:51.140 --> 01:24:54.140]  There's another problem with that
[01:24:54.140 --> 01:25:02.140]  These people you're referring to have authorized the judge to do what he's doing
[01:25:02.140 --> 01:25:11.140]  They have authorized our legislature to create law and they have authorized our judges to enforce that law
[01:25:11.140 --> 01:25:22.140]  So by you coming in and claiming that you decide common law based on your personal preferences or prerogatives
[01:25:22.140 --> 01:25:29.140]  You essentially nullify all of us
[01:25:29.140 --> 01:25:35.140]  And so in that regard everybody would get to make up their own law to suit their own fancy
[01:25:35.140 --> 01:25:42.140]  I can't see that working well and I can't see the courts enforcing that
[01:25:42.140 --> 01:26:00.140]  I don't agree with, well what I don't agree with is that we the people invested the judges with the power to act contrary to the constitution
[01:26:00.140 --> 01:26:02.140]  We did not do that
[01:26:02.140 --> 01:26:04.140]  No we did not do that
[01:26:04.140 --> 01:26:06.140]  That's correct
[01:26:06.140 --> 01:26:09.140]  And that's what I would be claiming
[01:26:09.140 --> 01:26:13.140]  Let's not start juxtaposing issues
[01:26:13.140 --> 01:26:24.140]  We're saying that we empowered our legislature to write law and we empowered our judicial to enforce that law
[01:26:24.140 --> 01:26:26.140]  Correct
[01:26:26.140 --> 01:26:28.140]  We did that through our constitution
[01:26:28.140 --> 01:26:30.140]  Yes
[01:26:30.140 --> 01:26:37.140]  So you can't come back now and say oh all that stuff doesn't apply because I don't want it to
[01:26:37.140 --> 01:26:39.140]  I didn't say that
[01:26:39.140 --> 01:26:43.140]  What are you saying? It is what I say it is
[01:26:43.140 --> 01:26:47.140]  So if I say it this way, none of that other stuff matters
[01:26:47.140 --> 01:26:52.140]  You can't enforce that other law against me because I came in and made up my own
[01:26:52.140 --> 01:26:55.140]  No I'm not saying that
[01:26:55.140 --> 01:26:58.140]  Okay hang on, be right back
[01:27:07.140 --> 01:27:10.140]  Privacy is under attack
[01:27:10.140 --> 01:27:14.140]  When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[01:27:14.140 --> 01:27:19.140]  And once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:27:19.140 --> 01:27:24.140]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:27:24.140 --> 01:27:27.140]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:27:27.140 --> 01:27:31.140]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com
[01:27:32.140 --> 01:27:37.140]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong
[01:27:37.140 --> 01:27:42.140]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade
[01:27:42.140 --> 01:27:49.140]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda in the world
[01:27:49.140 --> 01:27:56.140]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda in the world
[01:27:56.140 --> 01:28:02.140]  Regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all
[01:28:02.140 --> 01:28:05.140]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite
[01:28:05.140 --> 01:28:09.140]  But unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it
[01:28:09.140 --> 01:28:15.140]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake
[01:28:15.140 --> 01:28:18.140]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight
[01:28:18.140 --> 01:28:23.140]  And if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead
[01:28:23.140 --> 01:28:28.140]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:28:29.140 --> 01:28:35.140]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:28:35.140 --> 01:28:37.140]  The government says that fire brought it down
[01:28:37.140 --> 01:28:42.140]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:28:42.140 --> 01:28:45.140]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:28:45.140 --> 01:28:47.140]  But thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[01:28:47.140 --> 01:28:49.140]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[01:28:49.140 --> 01:28:50.140]  I'm a structural engineer
[01:28:50.140 --> 01:28:51.140]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[01:28:51.140 --> 01:28:52.140]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:28:52.140 --> 01:28:53.140]  I'm a father who lost his son
[01:28:53.140 --> 01:28:56.140]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth
[01:28:56.140 --> 01:28:59.140]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:29:23.140 --> 01:29:27.140]  The former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[01:29:27.140 --> 01:29:30.140]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:29:30.140 --> 01:29:32.140]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:29:32.140 --> 01:29:34.140]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:29:34.140 --> 01:29:38.140]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:29:38.140 --> 01:29:39.140]  and ordering your copy today
[01:29:39.140 --> 01:29:41.140]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[01:29:41.140 --> 01:29:44.140]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[01:29:44.140 --> 01:29:46.140]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[01:29:46.140 --> 01:29:49.140]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:29:49.140 --> 01:29:53.140]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com
[01:29:53.140 --> 01:29:57.140]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[01:30:01.140 --> 01:30:04.140]  Looking for some truth? You found it!
[01:30:04.140 --> 01:30:07.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:19.140 --> 01:30:21.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:21.140 --> 01:30:23.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:23.140 --> 01:30:25.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:25.140 --> 01:30:27.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:27.140 --> 01:30:29.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:29.140 --> 01:30:31.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:31.140 --> 01:30:33.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:33.140 --> 01:30:35.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:35.140 --> 01:30:37.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:37.140 --> 01:30:39.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:39.140 --> 01:30:41.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:41.140 --> 01:30:43.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:43.140 --> 01:30:45.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:45.140 --> 01:30:47.140]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:47.140 --> 01:30:49.140]  Pl asleep
[01:30:49.140 --> 01:30:53.560]  Wild
[01:30:53.560 --> 01:30:55.560]  Wild
[01:30:55.560 --> 01:31:01.560]  Wild
[01:31:01.560 --> 01:31:05.560]  Wild
[01:31:05.560 --> 01:31:07.560]  Wild
[01:31:07.560 --> 01:31:11.560]  Event
[01:31:11.560 --> 01:31:13.560]  Event
[01:31:13.560 --> 01:31:15.560]  Event
[01:31:15.560 --> 01:31:16.560]  Event
[01:31:16.560 --> 01:31:23.920]  define it. I think it could be helpful to note that common law is not something, America
[01:31:23.920 --> 01:31:30.320]  didn't come up with common law. This is something common to man, common to people, and something
[01:31:30.320 --> 01:31:39.440]  that was just generally recognized. And we have codified that to the best of our ability
[01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:49.360]  legislatures have codified that and made an attempt to say, okay, this is a crime. Yes,
[01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:54.800]  we're going to prosecute this and it has these elements in it. And once it's been
[01:31:58.480 --> 01:32:06.240]  presented in that way, then to prosecute it in a common law way is more fuzzy. And they say,
[01:32:06.240 --> 01:32:11.520]  well, we're not going to do the fuzzy prosecutions. That's why we see comments
[01:32:14.160 --> 01:32:22.720]  by legislatures saying the common law prosecutions are abolished because they figure they've covered
[01:32:22.720 --> 01:32:32.560]  the bases well enough with codifying crimes that would have otherwise been just understood.
[01:32:36.560 --> 01:32:45.360]  I mean, even Black's law even defines a court of record as a court that proceeds according
[01:32:45.360 --> 01:32:49.040]  to the common law. This is literally out of Black's law.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:57.520]  What does the common law mean? Are they using common law there as a noun or as a transitive verb?
[01:32:57.520 --> 01:33:07.120]  Are they using it as the common law as a noun or the law common to
[01:33:08.320 --> 01:33:12.960]  the people? And that's the law that we've codified into code.
[01:33:15.680 --> 01:33:16.560]  Yeah, I don't disagree.
[01:33:16.560 --> 01:33:22.480]  I don't know. Are you looking at a Black that has some references to show
[01:33:23.120 --> 01:33:26.000]  which case law they got that idea from, that definition?
[01:33:28.480 --> 01:33:32.320]  I could look in the fourth edition because that has a lot of case law.
[01:33:33.280 --> 01:33:36.000]  Right, that could be useful to help clarify.
[01:33:38.480 --> 01:33:44.240]  A dictionary definition that has no case, especially a legal dictionary definition that
[01:33:44.240 --> 01:33:49.200]  does not base its definition on specific case law is meaningless.
[01:33:49.200 --> 01:34:01.680]  We have tried to take the common law and codified it into a code that everybody could read
[01:34:01.680 --> 01:34:12.480]  and understand. And now we have people trying to make a distinction between this common law,
[01:34:12.480 --> 01:34:15.200]  this law that's common to everybody and everybody knows it.
[01:34:16.080 --> 01:34:23.120]  As opposed to that portion of the common law, we've tried to specify and lay down so everyone
[01:34:23.120 --> 01:34:31.760]  would treat the application of the law consistently. So I will give you a very good example that comes
[01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:40.400]  out of the statute of 42 USC 1983. And that had the mentioning of common law in it,
[01:34:40.400 --> 01:34:50.080]  and then they took it out. And those were the 16 words that they took out where in the middle
[01:34:50.080 --> 01:35:00.720]  of the language of the 1983 statute, it said notwithstanding to ordinance, blah, blah,
[01:35:00.720 --> 01:35:07.520]  and then custom and usage. And custom and usage is the term describing common law. And there is
[01:35:08.240 --> 01:35:14.880]  a amicus brief going to the Supreme Court from the Institute of Justice that talks about this,
[01:35:15.440 --> 01:35:21.680]  about the removing of the words and what that means. And then there's the Supreme Court ruling
[01:35:23.520 --> 01:35:29.440]  that- Wait a minute, what words were removed?
[01:35:31.440 --> 01:35:37.200]  Yeah, I'd like to speak to that just briefly when you get you finished there.
[01:35:37.200 --> 01:35:38.240]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:35:42.800 --> 01:35:52.400]  Okay, so she was talking about notwithstanding ordinances, customs or usage and interpreting
[01:35:52.400 --> 01:36:01.760]  that to mean common law. And I read that a little differently. When I've seen that phrase, it looks
[01:36:01.760 --> 01:36:11.600]  to me like it's saying that you can sue a state actor for depriving you of your protected rights,
[01:36:11.600 --> 01:36:20.960]  even if a state ordinance or a state custom or a state usage, de facto, this is the way we do
[01:36:20.960 --> 01:36:29.360]  things around here. Even if some of that contradicts your protected right, you can still sue that state
[01:36:29.360 --> 01:36:35.760]  actor because your right is still protected by the constitution, even if there is some
[01:36:36.320 --> 01:36:43.040]  custom or usage. I don't think it's referring to common law in the way that you're drawing that
[01:36:43.040 --> 01:36:52.480]  distinction as law that is common to all men versus law that has been codified. I don't think that's
[01:36:52.480 --> 01:36:58.320]  what it's referencing there. I think it's just guaranteeing you that you can sue these state
[01:36:58.320 --> 01:37:05.040]  actors for violating your protected rights. Yeah, I just sent you on Telegram. I sent you
[01:37:05.040 --> 01:37:13.040]  the amicus brief of the Institute for Justice, and they went over the meaning of those 16 words
[01:37:13.040 --> 01:37:19.440]  and then the removal from the statute. And they reference the common law many, many times. And
[01:37:19.440 --> 01:37:26.240]  this is where I got it out. Okay, cool. Amongst other things. But then there's also the Supreme
[01:37:26.240 --> 01:37:36.080]  Court ruling that did not rule favorable to them. But still, this is a reference to what this means
[01:37:39.840 --> 01:37:46.640]  and explains that removal of these 16 words, basically, out of that statute.
[01:37:47.600 --> 01:37:54.560]  So I feel like that there is a lot of reference to common law in the case law, actually.
[01:37:55.280 --> 01:38:04.560]  And I don't... The point of all bringing this up here is not... I don't want to convince anyone
[01:38:04.560 --> 01:38:13.120]  that there is common law. My intent for this phone call tonight was rather to see if you guys would
[01:38:13.680 --> 01:38:24.160]  have a suspicion of what would happen if I reword my complaint into what I said,
[01:38:25.120 --> 01:38:34.240]  leaving out all these statutes. If I just word it as that I claim that I am one of the people
[01:38:35.040 --> 01:38:40.400]  that granted the government limited powers, and I'm here and I'm claiming that
[01:38:40.720 --> 01:38:51.920]  there was a trespass on the case. Basically, that's a term that I got from another filing
[01:38:51.920 --> 01:38:57.920]  common law claim papers that I read. And that I claim that these men and women didn't have
[01:38:57.920 --> 01:39:04.240]  the right to do what they did. And so I cite the Constitution. I cite the oaths that they swore.
[01:39:04.320 --> 01:39:11.360]  So I make it very simple. I don't mention statutes. And I'm just wondering
[01:39:12.480 --> 01:39:17.520]  what would happen, because I believe everything that I claim I could support with evidence.
[01:39:19.120 --> 01:39:28.720]  Yes, with evidence that's good enough for you. But how do you take something fuzzy like common law,
[01:39:29.680 --> 01:39:38.880]  which is the way I look at it? Everybody defines common law so many different ways.
[01:39:39.600 --> 01:39:45.280]  And I think that's because you can't go to check out a book and find, here's the book that says
[01:39:45.280 --> 01:39:50.640]  the common law, and here it is from A to Z. You can't go read it. It doesn't exist. Some
[01:39:50.640 --> 01:39:56.480]  lawyers even try to say that it includes case law, which is nothing but judicial opinions.
[01:39:59.200 --> 01:40:05.280]  Honestly, the way I think it is, is the golden rule. Do unto others as you would have them do
[01:40:05.280 --> 01:40:13.680]  unto you. And it's that simple, but it got spread out into so many splinters because
[01:40:14.720 --> 01:40:22.160]  people should treat each other well. And here are a lot of different ways that we commonly see
[01:40:22.160 --> 01:40:30.320]  people not treating each other well. And they even get names like fraud and deprivation of
[01:40:30.320 --> 01:40:37.920]  this right or that. And then we have causes of action and those causes end up getting codified
[01:40:37.920 --> 01:40:44.240]  with essential elements. If you want to walk into court without a cause of action that points to a
[01:40:44.240 --> 01:40:51.360]  statute or to at least to a constitutional provision, how are you going to have essential
[01:40:51.360 --> 01:41:00.640]  elements? How can you produce facts that go to those elements? Do you have a business with
[01:41:00.640 --> 01:41:05.920]  five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA
[01:41:05.920 --> 01:41:11.280]  taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on? Or how would you
[01:41:11.280 --> 01:41:17.920]  like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost? The
[01:41:17.920 --> 01:41:25.440]  CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your employees with
[01:41:25.440 --> 01:41:33.440]  doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero co-pay. If you are an
[01:41:33.440 --> 01:41:40.640]  employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save
[01:41:40.640 --> 01:41:47.680]  hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes. The CHAMP plan can help add working capital,
[01:41:47.680 --> 01:41:58.960]  market resale value, or pay down lines of credit. Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[01:42:00.080 --> 01:42:06.560]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary,
[01:42:06.560 --> 01:42:12.880]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:42:12.960 --> 01:42:19.840]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:42:19.840 --> 01:42:25.920]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you
[01:42:25.920 --> 01:42:32.960]  can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:42:33.600 --> 01:42:39.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[01:42:39.120 --> 01:42:44.640]  and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom,
[01:42:44.640 --> 01:42:52.160]  video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[01:42:52.160 --> 01:42:59.200]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:22.160 --> 01:43:44.800]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. And I'm having a concern here,
[01:43:44.800 --> 01:43:51.120]  and this is a concern I've had for a long time. That's why we're spending so much time on this.
[01:43:52.320 --> 01:44:01.040]  I'm listening to you speak to common law and you're using the word common,
[01:44:02.400 --> 01:44:09.920]  actually the phrase common law, in what appears to be at one point you're using it as a noun
[01:44:10.640 --> 01:44:13.840]  and then the next time you're using it as a verb or an adjective.
[01:44:13.920 --> 01:44:18.640]  And we're mixing these two uses of it together.
[01:44:20.320 --> 01:44:25.200]  I know that probably doesn't make any sense, but the problem with the argument is the argument
[01:44:25.200 --> 01:44:32.800]  doesn't make sense. Our legislature took what was considered to be the common law
[01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:42.240]  and carefully analyzed and defined it and said, this is what the law of fraud is.
[01:44:43.120 --> 01:44:48.720]  So we have common law fraud. Okay, how do I prove common law fraud?
[01:44:49.840 --> 01:44:55.760]  Well, he told me I was fat and ugly, and I'm not fat and ugly. Well,
[01:44:57.120 --> 01:45:03.520]  you may look at me and say, yeah, you are fat and ugly. So the belief is common to who?
[01:45:05.200 --> 01:45:11.920]  The law is common to who? So the legislature said, okay, let's take this common law and let's
[01:45:12.800 --> 01:45:22.000]  specify it. Let's add all of the pieces to it that are required in order to establish fraud
[01:45:23.440 --> 01:45:31.040]  as opposed to other potential claims. Let's come up with a way to specifically define it.
[01:45:32.720 --> 01:45:39.120]  It did not stop being part of the common law because the legislature carefully defined it.
[01:45:39.120 --> 01:45:50.400]  But it just became more clear. So you're using common law and not being using it with enough
[01:45:50.400 --> 01:45:59.360]  specificity for me to get sentences straightened out. I'm struggling to try to figure out how to
[01:45:59.360 --> 01:46:05.520]  say something that's been bothering me for a very long time. Am I making any sense at all
[01:46:05.520 --> 01:46:21.440]  or am I just rambling? So I would say that, like I said, I don't wanna prove what common law is.
[01:46:21.440 --> 01:46:30.080]  I know it exists because Supreme Court rulings have it in their language.
[01:46:31.040 --> 01:46:35.040]  No, wait a minute. Yeah, but you're saying our common law exists. Are you saying
[01:46:35.840 --> 01:46:43.840]  law that is common exists? Or are you saying the noun common law, the proper noun common law
[01:46:43.840 --> 01:46:52.160]  exists? The noun common law exists. That term exists. It's in many, many opinions.
[01:46:52.240 --> 01:47:00.000]  What gives it, what is it then if it's a noun, it's a thing? Where do I find it?
[01:47:01.280 --> 01:47:05.840]  I can only tell you what I understand. But as I said, I didn't wanna
[01:47:07.120 --> 01:47:11.200]  prove to you what exactly it is because I'm not an expert on it.
[01:47:12.640 --> 01:47:18.560]  We can't talk about it because you're saying the word common law and I'm sure it means something
[01:47:18.560 --> 01:47:24.640]  to you. I'm not having the same meaning.
[01:47:25.760 --> 01:47:34.640]  Okay, so to me, common law is defined as custom and usage unwritten. It's unwritten. That means
[01:47:34.640 --> 01:47:44.960]  that what people do, what society does, you walk on the street, you meet someone that you know,
[01:47:44.960 --> 01:47:49.280]  you will say hi. That's not a law. That's just common. It's just common practice.
[01:47:50.960 --> 01:48:00.480]  It's unwritten. So basically what I understand, a common law proceeding in courts, and that's
[01:48:00.480 --> 01:48:07.840]  also what I wanted to mention is the jury would determine the verdict, basically, would determine
[01:48:07.840 --> 01:48:12.320]  what it is. The judge would just- Well, but here's the tricky part with that.
[01:48:13.280 --> 01:48:19.920]  When you get a jury, you have to hand them, here's exactly what this person is charged with
[01:48:19.920 --> 01:48:27.200]  and here are the elements of that. So you hand them like pattern jury charges or
[01:48:27.200 --> 01:48:31.600]  standard jury instructions, they might be called. But it has a little checklist
[01:48:32.480 --> 01:48:41.440]  that each juror can look at that list. There might be five check boxes. And so as they listen to the
[01:48:41.440 --> 01:48:51.280]  witnesses coming up to testify, and they look at the evidence that's admitted, they can check
[01:48:51.280 --> 01:48:59.280]  the boxes off and say, yes, there were facts sufficient and adequate to support a finding of
[01:48:59.280 --> 01:49:07.440]  facts that supports this element. And if all those elements get supported, then you would have a
[01:49:07.440 --> 01:49:15.360]  guilty. But without elements, if you have no elements, everything's just fuzzy.
[01:49:15.360 --> 01:49:22.000]  Well, I believe he did wrong. Well, what's wrong? How do you punish somebody for what's
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:29.520]  wrongness? It's general and fuzzy. I believe this guy committed child abuse by having sex with a
[01:49:30.240 --> 01:49:36.880]  14 year old girl. That depends on what country you're in, because in some countries in Africa,
[01:49:36.880 --> 01:49:44.800]  it's the job of the uncle to teach the niece how to have sex.
[01:49:44.800 --> 01:49:51.840]  So when she gets married, they will have a good relationship. Now in that culture,
[01:49:51.840 --> 01:49:57.360]  that was perfectly fine. That was common law. Yep, not perfectly fine in this culture.
[01:49:58.240 --> 01:50:06.640]  I was the movie pilot where this guy goes to Japan back in the time of the samurai.
[01:50:06.640 --> 01:50:13.200]  The samurai kills this older guy, this servant, does something they didn't like. And the samurai
[01:50:13.200 --> 01:50:22.400]  cut his head off. The pilot was just aghast. And the woman who was there to help him, she said,
[01:50:22.400 --> 01:50:27.600]  no, you don't understand. Famine is rampant in Japan.
[01:50:29.680 --> 01:50:37.280]  The samurai gave this man, who otherwise would likely die of starvation in old age,
[01:50:37.280 --> 01:50:42.800]  gave him an honorable death. And because he gave this man an honorable death,
[01:50:42.800 --> 01:50:47.440]  someone else won't starve to death. That's their common law.
[01:50:47.600 --> 01:50:54.480]  Yeah, right. So, yeah, common law is not so common. And our legislatures and our courts said,
[01:50:54.480 --> 01:50:59.760]  well, the legislature said, okay, let's take the common beliefs of the people.
[01:51:00.560 --> 01:51:05.040]  Yeah, which were largely from England at the time. They got everything mainly from England.
[01:51:06.240 --> 01:51:13.680]  And let's specify it. So it doesn't change with the day. It doesn't change with the season.
[01:51:13.840 --> 01:51:22.240]  It doesn't change with the season. The law now becomes consistent. So how is this not the common
[01:51:22.240 --> 01:51:32.880]  law? Just because it's specified and defined. Okay, now maybe we can get back to her question
[01:51:32.880 --> 01:51:40.720]  with that that you've just said. Maybe we can link back to her question about what if she were to
[01:51:40.800 --> 01:51:46.800]  take out everything in her pleadings that refers to a statute. What if she were to simply reference
[01:51:47.680 --> 01:51:54.880]  common law in a general and vague way and say, hey, I'm one of the people you're responsible to
[01:51:54.880 --> 01:52:00.640]  do according to your oath. You're not authorized to do this. And so this is a common law action
[01:52:00.640 --> 01:52:10.640]  against you. What if? And I would say you lost your teeth. It lost its teeth. It lost its ability
[01:52:10.800 --> 01:52:17.200]  to have a punishment that goes with it. Something that's codified that this kind of wrongdoing
[01:52:17.920 --> 01:52:23.840]  has these elements that would, this is how you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
[01:52:24.560 --> 01:52:31.120]  And if somebody does that, it has, what do you know? It's a third degree felony. It's a whatever.
[01:52:31.840 --> 01:52:35.520]  It has this punishment associated with it. You lose all that.
[01:52:35.520 --> 01:52:44.480]  But would I, so the punishment, I mean, that would come with the jury. The jury at the end would,
[01:52:44.480 --> 01:52:51.600]  I guess, decide the punishment. But my main goal is to not get my case dismissed with prejudice,
[01:52:51.600 --> 01:52:57.920]  which will likely happen because that's what they keep apparently doing. That's from what I'm reading
[01:52:57.920 --> 01:53:02.240]  all the other cases. So if I look out their immunity.
[01:53:02.240 --> 01:53:09.680]  Okay. That's a better question. I think that we can be more helpful with is how do we take
[01:53:11.280 --> 01:53:20.400]  a pleading and get past their immunity? I think that we can work with a lot more easily.
[01:53:21.360 --> 01:53:28.400]  I've gotten past the immunity question in the Fed. And I think Randy did with your
[01:53:29.520 --> 01:53:33.440]  recent one, you got past immunity, right? They weren't claiming immunity at the end, were they?
[01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:34.800]  No, they did not.
[01:53:34.800 --> 01:53:38.560]  I think they started that way. But then when you show them that they don't have any,
[01:53:38.560 --> 01:53:40.640]  they kind of shut up and start talking about other things.
[01:53:42.400 --> 01:53:48.080]  What I did was I backed them into a corner. I asked them to do something they couldn't do.
[01:53:48.080 --> 01:53:56.080]  I asked them for $485 million. And I asked for that from each of these judges individually. Well,
[01:53:56.080 --> 01:54:01.600]  that's not gonna happen. So they didn't dismiss my case on its merits.
[01:54:03.200 --> 01:54:09.360]  They didn't dismiss my case because I failed to state a claim.
[01:54:09.360 --> 01:54:13.600]  They didn't dismiss my case because the judges had immunity.
[01:54:13.600 --> 01:54:18.880]  They dismissed it because it was frivolous, because they wanted to.
[01:54:19.840 --> 01:54:26.640]  So that's gonna happen. And there's some things, there's no magic here.
[01:54:28.800 --> 01:54:35.440]  There's no incantation that you can do that will magically make people do the right thing.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:39.680]  Right. It's just hard work holding them accountable when they don't.
[01:54:40.400 --> 01:54:46.880]  And if you rewrite the pleading, I sat as a mock judge in a mock trial in Massachusetts.
[01:54:47.680 --> 01:54:54.000]  And these guys were getting up there talking about all this patriot theory.
[01:54:54.880 --> 01:54:57.920]  And I sat there and listened to them, and I'm sitting here as the judge.
[01:54:57.920 --> 01:55:03.360]  Okay, it is my job to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence
[01:55:03.360 --> 01:55:06.160]  and apply the laws that comes to me to the facts of the case.
[01:55:06.160 --> 01:55:08.880]  And I'm sitting here and say, okay, give me some facts.
[01:55:09.680 --> 01:55:12.320]  And now give me some law as it goes to those facts.
[01:55:13.840 --> 01:55:20.240]  They're not doing any of that stuff. And I'm thinking, I got nothing I can use here.
[01:55:20.960 --> 01:55:27.360]  I have not given me anything I can rule on. If you do that, if you take out all the facts and stuff
[01:55:27.360 --> 01:55:32.080]  and just tell them what you believe the common law is, the judge may agree with you.
[01:55:33.040 --> 01:55:38.640]  But you haven't given the judge anything he can rule on. It's his job to
[01:55:39.440 --> 01:55:41.520]  determine the facts and apply the law to the facts.
[01:55:42.160 --> 01:55:46.000]  Without that, you haven't asked the judge to do anything. We'll be right back.
[01:55:49.280 --> 01:55:52.400]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:55:52.960 --> 01:55:56.720]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:55:57.360 --> 01:56:00.880]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text.
[01:56:00.880 --> 01:56:05.040]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:12.480]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate.
[01:56:12.480 --> 01:56:16.640]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:56:17.280 --> 01:56:21.440]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:56:21.440 --> 01:56:26.480]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:56:27.040 --> 01:56:31.760]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:42.720]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:56:42.720 --> 01:56:49.040]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:56:49.680 --> 01:56:55.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:57:01.040 --> 01:57:04.800]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:57:04.800 --> 01:57:08.480]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:57:08.480 --> 01:57:11.440]  Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[01:57:11.440 --> 01:57:15.600]  and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[01:57:15.600 --> 01:57:21.120]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:57:21.120 --> 01:57:25.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57:25.920 --> 01:57:31.200]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:57:31.200 --> 01:57:35.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[01:57:35.840 --> 01:57:41.360]  startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:57:41.360 --> 01:57:43.280]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:57:44.080 --> 01:57:49.520]  Spar, it's what fighters do. It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[01:57:49.520 --> 01:57:52.480]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[01:57:52.480 --> 01:58:01.200]  SPAR with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:58:01.200 --> 01:58:06.720]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:58:06.720 --> 01:58:12.720]  But petition for redress is another matter. We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:58:13.680 --> 01:58:18.080]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out the reasons
[01:58:18.080 --> 01:58:20.400]  without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:58:20.400 --> 01:58:24.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:58:30.240 --> 01:58:33.920]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:58:33.920 --> 01:58:39.040]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[01:58:39.040 --> 01:58:44.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:58:45.520 --> 01:58:51.040]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:58:51.040 --> 01:58:55.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58:55.840 --> 01:59:01.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:59:01.120 --> 01:59:07.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:59:07.200 --> 01:59:13.120]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:59:14.960 --> 01:59:21.360]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:59:21.360 --> 01:59:25.760]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[01:59:25.760 --> 01:59:29.760]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:59:29.760 --> 01:59:33.040]  Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:37.920]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said,
[01:59:37.920 --> 01:59:42.800]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[01:59:42.800 --> 01:59:46.800]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[01:59:46.800 --> 01:59:50.240]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:59:50.240 --> 01:59:54.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:00:03.040 --> 02:00:18.880]  I received my remedy today.
[02:00:20.560 --> 02:00:28.640]  Game in the box, just like they say. I accept it for value right away, if not sooner,
[02:00:29.280 --> 02:00:37.280]  not later. We are originators, and the pathway seems to get straighter every day.
[02:00:38.960 --> 02:00:44.480]  And I can take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use.
[02:00:46.080 --> 02:00:51.280]  What I was good for, the gander, is gonna work for the goose.
[02:00:51.280 --> 02:01:05.680]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue Le Blanc radio. And this time, finally, Brett told me
[02:01:05.680 --> 02:01:14.800]  what year it was. But he told me he's wrong. That's elder abuse.
[02:01:15.680 --> 02:01:26.560]  Okay, this is January the 17th, 2025. Thank you very much, Brett. Okay, Teresa, this has been a
[02:01:26.560 --> 02:01:35.600]  good conversation because this has always been a very difficult problem. Brett and I have dealt
[02:01:35.600 --> 02:01:41.760]  with this common law issues. We get people coming on with common law stuff, and they bring out the
[02:01:41.760 --> 02:01:48.800]  absolute craziest stuff you can imagine. And then they wind up going to jail,
[02:01:49.680 --> 02:01:57.600]  and they don't understand, they're flabbergasted. And every time somebody mentions common law,
[02:01:57.600 --> 02:02:05.200]  we tense up. Because what you're doing is rational and reasonable.
[02:02:06.800 --> 02:02:11.360]  I'm gonna say it's not gonna work, but you're taking a rational and reasonable approach to it.
[02:02:11.760 --> 02:02:19.840]  But these guys do the absolute nutsiest stuff. And then when they get in jail, they call us to
[02:02:19.840 --> 02:02:28.560]  get them out. And it really gets frustrating for us. So this was a good conversation, trying to
[02:02:28.560 --> 02:02:35.520]  figure out how to address this to these guys. Because I really think the feds put this out here
[02:02:36.400 --> 02:02:40.000]  to nullify the legal reform community.
[02:02:41.760 --> 02:02:48.720]  And they've done a really good job of it. You don't see it much on our show because
[02:02:48.720 --> 02:02:54.080]  we have those guys come on and we send them packing. They do the same things, all of them
[02:02:54.080 --> 02:02:59.440]  do exactly the same thing. They will state something that's preposterous. And when you
[02:02:59.440 --> 02:03:04.720]  demonstrate how it's preposterous, yeah, but what about this? And they'll jump to something else,
[02:03:04.720 --> 02:03:09.200]  totally different justice preposterous. And you shoot down that one, oh, what about this?
[02:03:09.200 --> 02:03:13.760]  And they jump to something else and something else and something else. All of them do that
[02:03:13.760 --> 02:03:19.200]  exact same thing. I don't know where that comes from. I don't know who teaches that.
[02:03:20.880 --> 02:03:27.360]  But they all tell the same preposterous story, same way. And if you challenge them,
[02:03:28.160 --> 02:03:33.200]  their method of response is insulting and dismissive.
[02:03:34.960 --> 02:03:39.360]  It's really rude what they do, but all of them do that the same way.
[02:03:42.320 --> 02:03:44.000]  Who is teaching that stuff?
[02:03:44.000 --> 02:03:50.000]  I mean, there's so many people that teach, I guess, what you talk about,
[02:03:50.000 --> 02:03:57.920]  the patriot mythology and stuff. And the thing is, I think they are mixing
[02:03:58.320 --> 02:04:06.000]  the actual common law, which did exist. And I sent you that as well, Randy, on Telegram.
[02:04:06.720 --> 02:04:12.560]  It does exist in the judicial realm still, because they reference it, they respond to it.
[02:04:13.120 --> 02:04:20.880]  I can't exactly tell you the definition, because I'm really not educated enough about it. But I
[02:04:20.880 --> 02:04:30.560]  know that it exists, because it is referenced in a multitude of legal opinions, and it's there.
[02:04:32.880 --> 02:04:36.800]  I've been 30 years telling these people, I would love to find this.
[02:04:37.920 --> 02:04:44.960]  This would be a great tool to use. But Winston Shroud, he's one of the originals.
[02:04:45.600 --> 02:04:52.320]  Sam Kennedy, Winston Shroud, George, not George Gordon, Tim Turner.
[02:04:54.160 --> 02:04:56.960]  What's the one that's dying of cancer right now, Brett?
[02:04:59.280 --> 02:04:59.760]  I don't know.
[02:05:00.560 --> 02:05:05.600]  Oh, the lesson. But all of these guys are teaching the same spiel.
[02:05:05.600 --> 02:05:14.800]  And I never could get it. They all do the same things exactly the same way.
[02:05:15.360 --> 02:05:22.880]  They're even insulting and dismissive in exactly the same way. What the heck is going on here?
[02:05:24.080 --> 02:05:25.760]  What do you think about George Gordon?
[02:05:28.160 --> 02:05:32.240]  He was, George Gordon was, I learned from George Gordon.
[02:05:32.880 --> 02:05:39.440]  George Gordon was a creature of statute. He didn't do everything the way I did it,
[02:05:39.440 --> 02:05:45.920]  but he did everything by law. He didn't do any, go ahead.
[02:05:49.440 --> 02:05:56.720]  He didn't do any patriot mythology. This is my problem with Winston Shroud. I said,
[02:05:57.520 --> 02:06:00.480]  Winston, he's telling me about all the bankruptcy and all this stuff.
[02:06:01.360 --> 02:06:04.560]  I said, Winston, where did you come up with all this stuff?
[02:06:06.160 --> 02:06:12.560]  He said, well, I ask him first, where is the law supporting what you're saying?
[02:06:13.200 --> 02:06:19.840]  He said, well, I don't think you'll find any. Well, where did you come up with this? Said,
[02:06:20.640 --> 02:06:31.520]  I figured it out. So essentially, you made it up. Long pause, and I weren't live on the air.
[02:06:31.520 --> 02:06:35.120]  Long pause, and he said, well, yeah, I guess I did.
[02:06:36.640 --> 02:06:41.920]  Said, Winston, I'm a creature of statute. I can't go into court without made it up.
[02:06:42.080 --> 02:06:50.480]  I have to give the court facts and law. And whatever we think of the common law, when we're
[02:06:50.480 --> 02:07:01.760]  in court, the only thing he can pay attention to is facts and law as it's codified by the legislature
[02:07:02.400 --> 02:07:07.120]  and applied by the courts. That's the only thing he can see.
[02:07:07.120 --> 02:07:13.440]  He could agree with you. I said in this mock court, and I agreed with these guys.
[02:07:13.440 --> 02:07:20.960]  What he did was, while it was improperly unethical, it wasn't illegal.
[02:07:22.080 --> 02:07:24.480]  It was a loophole in the law. They hadn't closed.
[02:07:26.560 --> 02:07:30.720]  But he's not arguing that. He's arguing all this patriot stuff.
[02:07:31.280 --> 02:07:37.600]  And I'm saying, I can't use that. Give me facts and law. Show how
[02:07:39.760 --> 02:07:45.280]  what they're filing these liens against public officials is right there in the code.
[02:07:45.280 --> 02:07:52.720]  It says you can do that. Now, he used it in a way that it wasn't intended to be used.
[02:07:53.840 --> 02:07:59.360]  But it was right there in the code. So to stop all that, they had to pass new law.
[02:08:00.320 --> 02:08:04.400]  If George Gordon, he would argue the law. He would say exactly,
[02:08:05.040 --> 02:08:08.560]  this is where the code allows me to write a lien.
[02:08:11.680 --> 02:08:17.680]  Yeah, and George Gordon taught common law. This is what his school was named.
[02:08:19.840 --> 02:08:28.000]  I never, okay, I didn't study George Gordon deep enough to get into his common law arguments. I've
[02:08:28.000 --> 02:08:36.560]  never seen any of his common law arguments. I would like to, because that guy was, he did his homework.
[02:08:37.920 --> 02:08:38.880]  Yeah, I think so.
[02:08:40.320 --> 02:08:44.080]  I'll see if you can find some of George Gordon's work on common law.
[02:08:44.880 --> 02:08:46.320]  I would love to be able to use it.
[02:08:47.680 --> 02:08:52.800]  Yeah, I mean, I listened to all his YouTube videos that are still on YouTube.
[02:08:52.800 --> 02:09:00.080]  There's, I mean, he basically, he argued the same thing that I'm arguing. He argued that there's
[02:09:00.080 --> 02:09:06.000]  the Constitution, the people gave the government the power, it's limited. The government doesn't
[02:09:06.000 --> 02:09:12.160]  have the power to tell us to wear seat belts or that we need a license for private purposes
[02:09:12.160 --> 02:09:19.920]  or any such stuff. That's the same coming from the same angle, basically. And that's where I take-
[02:09:20.160 --> 02:09:29.520]  No, that's a different issue. Where the government, if he's talking the traffic issue,
[02:09:29.520 --> 02:09:34.320]  that's a separate issue. The government does have the power to do that in Arizona.
[02:09:35.680 --> 02:09:42.160]  Because in Arizona, they passed the traffic laws into the general statutes. In Texas,
[02:09:42.560 --> 02:09:46.880]  they didn't pass the traffic law into the general statutes.
[02:09:48.080 --> 02:09:54.240]  So they can pass all these traffic laws they want to, but they don't apply to me.
[02:09:56.480 --> 02:09:58.880]  Because I've got plates on that say deadheading.
[02:10:00.800 --> 02:10:10.240]  That says I'm not in commerce. And if you say that I have to display license plates,
[02:10:10.240 --> 02:10:17.280]  and this is exactly what I said to the GPS officer. So you're saying that the public
[02:10:17.280 --> 02:10:24.080]  roadways are no longer public, but they can only be used for commercial purposes.
[02:10:26.160 --> 02:10:31.680]  And he took a step back, physically he took a step back. He had nothing he could say.
[02:10:31.680 --> 02:10:41.040]  That's right. You can pass, you can tell me I have to wear a seatbelt,
[02:10:41.040 --> 02:10:46.240]  but if I'm not in commerce, that doesn't apply to me, so you can't tell me that.
[02:10:47.360 --> 02:10:52.880]  The legislature, if they pass laws that are not pugnitor constitution,
[02:10:53.360 --> 02:11:03.040]  they can pass any law they want to. We authorize them to do that with our constitution.
[02:11:06.400 --> 02:11:07.840]  And essentially-
[02:11:07.840 --> 02:11:11.040]  Well, they can pass any law that they want to. They can only
[02:11:11.040 --> 02:11:15.600]  exercise power that they have been given and that-
[02:11:15.600 --> 02:11:22.400]  Yeah, they can pass any law they want to within the scope of that constitution.
[02:11:23.200 --> 02:11:27.760]  Right, and it's not big. It's actually very small, but they-
[02:11:27.760 --> 02:11:33.040]  They can pass laws as long as it doesn't step on a constitutional right.
[02:11:34.000 --> 02:11:36.720]  Yeah. We authorized them to do that.
[02:11:39.440 --> 02:11:50.320]  So with what you're purporting to do, the problem I have with it is you're not moving the court to
[02:11:50.320 --> 02:11:59.280]  do something. You're just telling them what your opinion is, like these guys in that mock court.
[02:11:59.280 --> 02:12:05.920]  I called a recess and they actually picked a jury off the street, these people to participate,
[02:12:05.920 --> 02:12:10.640]  and they had this common law jury in there too. I'm sorry, mock jury.
[02:12:11.520 --> 02:12:16.480]  And I called a recess and I told him, told this guy, this guy over here helping you,
[02:12:16.640 --> 02:12:22.320]  if he gets up and says anything else, you have my permission to shoot him.
[02:12:23.840 --> 02:12:29.680]  He's gonna get you put in prison, because they spent two and a half hours
[02:12:30.400 --> 02:12:38.160]  going through every bit of patriot mythology you could imagine. Not one bit of it based on
[02:12:38.960 --> 02:12:45.680]  any law whatsoever. They just pulled all this stuff
[02:12:46.480 --> 02:12:58.560]  out of nowhere. They started out with a 1863 treaty that created the United States as a
[02:12:58.560 --> 02:13:12.640]  corporation. Probably heard of that. I read it. When they said use the word corporation,
[02:13:12.640 --> 02:13:21.680]  they used it as a transitive verb, not as a noun. They said we have 10 municipalities
[02:13:21.680 --> 02:13:30.000]  in this 10 square miles. They straddle the line between Virginia and Rhode Island.
[02:13:33.600 --> 02:13:38.640]  And so we're gonna incorporate all of these into one jurisdiction.
[02:13:38.640 --> 02:13:45.440]  They used incorporate as a verb, not as a noun.
[02:13:46.640 --> 02:13:50.400]  And then the patriots come along and said, it's a corporation.
[02:13:51.120 --> 02:13:58.160]  To know it's incorporated into one thing. And from that they went crazy. Hang on, we'll be right back.
[02:14:08.640 --> 02:14:13.440]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[02:14:13.440 --> 02:14:18.240]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[02:14:18.240 --> 02:14:24.080]  civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. How to answer
[02:14:24.080 --> 02:14:29.120]  letters and phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial
[02:14:29.120 --> 02:14:35.600]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method is the solution
[02:14:35.600 --> 02:14:40.320]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[02:14:40.320 --> 02:14:46.240]  information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email
[02:14:46.240 --> 02:14:56.160]  michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[02:14:56.160 --> 02:15:02.880]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law
[02:15:02.960 --> 02:15:06.960]  Traffic Seminar. In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people
[02:15:06.960 --> 02:15:11.360]  are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[02:15:11.360 --> 02:15:15.040]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[02:15:15.040 --> 02:15:19.440]  private capacity, and most importantly the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us
[02:15:19.440 --> 02:15:24.160]  the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[02:15:24.160 --> 02:15:28.160]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most
[02:15:28.160 --> 02:15:32.240]  comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how
[02:15:32.240 --> 02:15:36.400]  to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going
[02:15:36.400 --> 02:15:41.040]  to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's
[02:15:41.040 --> 02:15:45.760]  book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[02:15:45.760 --> 02:15:50.000]  seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[02:15:50.000 --> 02:15:54.240]  your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and
[02:15:54.240 --> 02:15:57.200]  together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[02:16:24.240 --> 02:16:28.000]  My friend, and all of your children, come on.
[02:16:54.240 --> 02:17:08.800]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We're talking to Alex in
[02:17:10.480 --> 02:17:13.440]  California, and we have spent a lot of time on this, but
[02:17:15.440 --> 02:17:21.840]  this is one of my favorite subjects, and it's been a thorny issue, so I appreciate
[02:17:22.720 --> 02:17:30.720]  getting the time to take this apart. I'm trying to find a really effective way
[02:17:31.760 --> 02:17:38.640]  to address this so people don't take these patriot notions and go get themselves in trouble.
[02:17:40.960 --> 02:17:46.160]  Did you know, Randy, that in this document that I sent you last week about
[02:17:46.880 --> 02:17:55.520]  what they published for the court to overcome the sovereign citizen movement,
[02:17:56.480 --> 02:17:59.440]  in that document they actually mentioned George Gordon.
[02:18:04.720 --> 02:18:10.800]  I understand them wanting to mention George Gordon because he's probably someone who gave him a fit.
[02:18:11.520 --> 02:18:18.000]  Tim Turner and Sam Kennedy and Winston Shroud, they were not a problem
[02:18:20.000 --> 02:18:22.240]  because they didn't do any law. George Gordon,
[02:18:22.960 --> 02:18:27.600]  he took the law to him, so I can see him not being happy with him.
[02:18:30.560 --> 02:18:35.840]  Yeah, I was actually trying to find cases of George Gordon. I only found one where he lost.
[02:18:35.840 --> 02:18:41.040]  I didn't find all the other ones. Maybe they scrubbed him from the internet. I don't know,
[02:18:41.040 --> 02:18:43.840]  but I would love to read them. Can't find them.
[02:18:46.480 --> 02:18:55.360]  His institute is still up and running, as I understand. His wife or his son or somebody is.
[02:18:56.800 --> 02:18:57.760]  His wife, I think.
[02:18:58.720 --> 02:19:07.680]  But yeah, I'll try to find them. But I found that, I think, I find it kind of alarming that they
[02:19:08.560 --> 02:19:15.520]  smush together the really crazy ones that you're referring to and the actual people who go by what's
[02:19:15.520 --> 02:19:22.400]  on what we actually have as laws. We're the ones that are the problem.
[02:19:24.080 --> 02:19:26.640]  These patriot mythologists, they're easy to handle.
[02:19:28.720 --> 02:19:34.560]  But when was the last time the Chief Justice of the Supreme got played like a cheap fiddle then
[02:19:34.560 --> 02:19:41.440]  sued for $20 billion in his personal capacity to the federal court? That makes them real unhappy.
[02:19:42.720 --> 02:19:46.400]  They are gonna want to find a way to neutralize Brett and I.
[02:19:48.720 --> 02:19:53.680]  We're taking these guys to task and they are not happy about it.
[02:19:53.680 --> 02:19:56.400]  The patriot mythologists, heck, they were a piece of cake.
[02:20:00.320 --> 02:20:07.760]  George Gordon Institute of TAFE. Technical and Further Education.
[02:20:10.160 --> 02:20:21.440]  So apparently still around. You can go into PACER and do a search for George Gordon.
[02:20:22.320 --> 02:20:26.720]  She did get a hit. He was out of Oklahoma.
[02:20:31.200 --> 02:20:32.480]  I thought he was in Oklahoma.
[02:20:33.680 --> 02:20:38.000]  Well, when he talked, he was always talking about Ada County and Idaho.
[02:20:38.880 --> 02:20:40.800]  Oh, okay. That's right.
[02:20:41.920 --> 02:20:43.200]  Ada County, Idaho.
[02:20:43.200 --> 02:20:56.160]  So you go into PACER and you do a search for the Idaho federal court
[02:20:56.880 --> 02:21:01.680]  and then do a search for George Gordon. She did get cases that hit.
[02:21:03.200 --> 02:21:06.080]  Yeah, I'll have to make an account. Just a quick-
[02:21:06.080 --> 02:21:07.840]  Oh, wait a minute. Wait a minute.
[02:21:07.840 --> 02:21:08.340]  Yeah.
[02:21:08.420 --> 02:21:18.340]  Charles George Gordon, this says. No, maybe that's somebody else.
[02:21:22.020 --> 02:21:29.700]  It says General Charles Gordon, George Gordon. That must be one of his ancestors.
[02:21:38.900 --> 02:21:47.940]  This is saying this George Gordon Institute started in 1885.
[02:21:49.060 --> 02:21:56.740]  Gordon Institute of TAFE. That's just to be the wrong one. Okay, I'll try to pick up George Gordon.
[02:21:59.620 --> 02:22:05.620]  Because he said he won over 30 cases and he said that in the 80s when he was talking.
[02:22:05.620 --> 02:22:11.940]  So I was trying to find those cases. But yeah, I'll have to make a PACER account. I haven't done
[02:22:11.940 --> 02:22:19.220]  that yet. Okay, so we need to go on.
[02:22:22.580 --> 02:22:28.100]  Can I just one quick question, Brett? Did they claim judicial immunity, Brett,
[02:22:28.100 --> 02:22:34.740]  in your case and how did you overcome that? In mine, I wasn't suing a judge.
[02:22:35.620 --> 02:22:40.420]  I was suing a prosecutor. So they were going after her prosecutorial immunity,
[02:22:40.420 --> 02:22:47.140]  hoping they could grasp at that straw. And then when I showed them they don't get to have that straw,
[02:22:48.180 --> 02:22:52.980]  well, they started going at other straws and seeing what else they could.
[02:22:54.340 --> 02:23:01.300]  But they didn't come back to that. Okay, in my case, they claim judicial immunity
[02:23:01.300 --> 02:23:11.140]  under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 104.001.
[02:23:13.780 --> 02:23:23.060]  What that one says is the state shall indemnify a public official sued in his official capacity.
[02:23:24.020 --> 02:23:31.060]  Oh yeah, indemnify. Immunity is not in there anywhere. And that was what I argued.
[02:23:32.820 --> 02:23:38.260]  Why didn't they claim judicial immunity? And that's what they always do, like the actual doctrine.
[02:23:39.940 --> 02:23:44.420]  Well, they couldn't because I did not sue them for a judicial act.
[02:23:47.540 --> 02:23:51.220]  But they could have claimed, no, that was a judicial act or something.
[02:23:53.060 --> 02:23:58.980]  They could, but I sued the state actors in the federal courts.
[02:24:01.540 --> 02:24:10.020]  There's no way for the state to immunize its officials so that they're
[02:24:13.220 --> 02:24:19.060]  without impunity to just deprive you of your federally protected rights.
[02:24:20.020 --> 02:24:22.580]  The state can't do that.
[02:24:23.940 --> 02:24:28.660]  That would violate the supremacy clause. That's what the case law says.
[02:24:30.580 --> 02:24:33.540]  But at the end of the day, I'm going to suggest you stay with
[02:24:34.340 --> 02:24:39.940]  the statute and case law that the courts use. If you go to something they don't use,
[02:24:39.940 --> 02:24:44.100]  they're just going to blow you away. Or do whatever they want.
[02:24:44.100 --> 02:24:51.140]  Did they claim 11th Amendment immunity? No.
[02:24:53.540 --> 02:25:00.580]  Interesting. Wow. Okay. All right. I know you have to move on and we talked so long.
[02:25:00.580 --> 02:25:03.460]  And thank you so much for your time, both of you.
[02:25:04.500 --> 02:25:10.500]  Okay. Thank you, Alex. Okay. Now we're going to Teresa in California. Hello, Teresa.
[02:25:11.140 --> 02:25:13.140]  What do you have for us today?
[02:25:15.140 --> 02:25:24.900]  Okay. So I was walking down the street about four or five months ago, and I was
[02:25:24.900 --> 02:25:32.020]  ambushed by three sheriff's deputies that claimed I fit the description of a
[02:25:32.020 --> 02:25:36.900]  suspect that had just robbed a local store. Oh, my.
[02:25:36.980 --> 02:25:44.420]  Hi. Yeah. And I invoked my first amendment right to remain silent and demanded an attorney.
[02:25:45.140 --> 02:25:51.300]  And immediately I had some guy who was groping me. I was thrown in cuffs and then thrown,
[02:25:51.300 --> 02:26:01.380]  strapped into the police, the sheriff's vehicle. So I requested a copy of the incident report
[02:26:01.940 --> 02:26:12.260]  of the burglary and a copy of the description of the suspect. And they just, can I?
[02:26:12.260 --> 02:26:22.260]  Smart. Yeah. This is a question I want to ask you guys. So they are claiming that both the incident
[02:26:22.260 --> 02:26:29.220]  report and a description of the suspect are exempt from disclosure.
[02:26:30.740 --> 02:26:42.660]  And claiming what? She said exempt from disclosure. Now, what they might be saying is if it's
[02:26:42.660 --> 02:26:49.860]  requested as a public records request, but we'll help you get that translated into a discovery
[02:26:49.860 --> 02:26:55.540]  request and they can't have anything to walk about. We'll be right back after these sponsors.
[02:26:56.900 --> 02:27:04.260]  Hold on. Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way
[02:27:04.260 --> 02:27:08.900]  you walk could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be
[02:27:08.900 --> 02:27:15.620]  back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you
[02:27:15.620 --> 02:27:20.660]  give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[02:27:20.660 --> 02:27:26.580]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[02:27:26.580 --> 02:27:32.340]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service
[02:27:32.340 --> 02:27:37.620]  announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[02:27:37.620 --> 02:27:45.060]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with startpage. New research shows how fast you walk could
[02:27:45.060 --> 02:27:49.220]  predict how long you're going to live. The Journal of the American Medical Association
[02:27:49.220 --> 02:27:54.820]  reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected.
[02:27:54.820 --> 02:27:59.300]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[02:27:59.300 --> 02:28:04.020]  A senior's age, gender and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy
[02:28:04.020 --> 02:28:09.300]  as more traditional statistical measures. Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[02:28:09.300 --> 02:28:13.620]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. It only takes a stopwatch,
[02:28:13.620 --> 02:28:18.100]  some space to walk in a few minutes. Researchers say it could help doctors identify
[02:28:18.100 --> 02:28:21.940]  older patients who need special care. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:28:21.940 --> 02:28:24.820]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:28:34.100 --> 02:28:37.700]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[02:28:37.700 --> 02:28:41.860]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[02:28:41.860 --> 02:28:45.780]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[02:28:45.780 --> 02:28:50.980]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to
[02:28:50.980 --> 02:28:56.900]  the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go to buildingwhat.org.
[02:28:56.900 --> 02:28:59.460]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[02:29:00.180 --> 02:29:05.860]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of his word?
[02:29:05.860 --> 02:29:11.060]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for
[02:29:11.060 --> 02:29:16.820]  scripture talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2 15.
[02:29:17.460 --> 02:29:22.020]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed,
[02:29:22.020 --> 02:29:27.140]  rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the
[02:29:27.140 --> 02:29:31.860]  Book of Mark where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[02:29:31.860 --> 02:29:36.820]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and
[02:29:36.820 --> 02:29:41.860]  Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all
[02:29:41.860 --> 02:29:47.380]  those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into
[02:29:47.380 --> 02:29:53.780]  the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com
[02:29:53.780 --> 02:29:58.980]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[02:30:01.540 --> 02:30:05.620]  Live free speech radio logosradionetwork.com
[02:30:54.020 --> 02:30:58.900]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Radio and we're talking to Teresa in California.
[02:31:01.060 --> 02:31:04.020]  Teresa, did they take you to a magistrate?
[02:31:05.620 --> 02:31:11.300]  Well, what wound up happening was after they strapped me in the car,
[02:31:12.100 --> 02:31:18.020]  I said, okay, I'll give you my last name. You have to take me out of the cuffs in the car first,
[02:31:18.980 --> 02:31:24.980]  uh, which they did. Then I gave them my last name and then they wanted my date of birth.
[02:31:25.540 --> 02:31:29.860]  So, and, and I told them, I'm not going to give you my date of birth. You'll have to put me back
[02:31:29.860 --> 02:31:38.180]  in the car and take me to jail, which they didn't do. So I walked away. But the, the question is,
[02:31:39.140 --> 02:31:44.580]  am I entitled to that record if that's the reason that I was handcuffed?
[02:31:44.580 --> 02:31:48.740]  Okay. Hold on. Hold on. Were you charged with this offense?
[02:31:51.220 --> 02:31:56.100]  Pardon me? Were you charged and prosecuted for this offense?
[02:31:57.140 --> 02:32:00.100]  No. They just let you walk.
[02:32:01.220 --> 02:32:04.900]  They didn't give you a summons to show up in court and defend yourself about anything?
[02:32:06.180 --> 02:32:08.340]  Uh, no, because I went to. Okay.
[02:32:09.220 --> 02:32:15.940]  If there is no case in no, in controversy, it's open records.
[02:32:16.820 --> 02:32:24.820]  Yep. So what I suggest is, is what, what we're doing here is instead of going in there and
[02:32:24.820 --> 02:32:29.060]  fighting with these guys, trying to get them to do the right thing. Cause you're in California.
[02:32:29.940 --> 02:32:36.740]  Yes. Yeah. We have people calling in and say, oh, my county is the most corrupt county in the nation.
[02:32:37.700 --> 02:32:41.780]  And now I tell them, not if you're not in California, it ain't.
[02:32:44.900 --> 02:32:50.100]  California has a really great body of law. There's nobody follows it. So,
[02:32:51.700 --> 02:33:02.260]  uh, these guys want to fight. Let's take it to them. I went to a judge here in Texas and
[02:33:02.260 --> 02:33:06.020]  gave him a criminal complaint against the sheriff.
[02:33:07.860 --> 02:33:17.060]  And the law says that when I, a complaint is presented forwarded to a judge and is complete
[02:33:17.060 --> 02:33:22.900]  in accordance with 1505, the judge shall forth with issue a warrant. He didn't force it with
[02:33:22.900 --> 02:33:30.900]  issue a warrant. I went down to the JP court and sued him in the JP court for $19,000 in his
[02:33:30.900 --> 02:33:38.020]  personal capacity. How's that work for you, Bubba? So this, you have asked for these records.
[02:33:39.220 --> 02:33:48.420]  The prosecutor didn't give them to you. Make up a small claims court case. In Texas, it costs like
[02:33:48.420 --> 02:34:00.100]  $54 and sue him in his personal capacity in the federal court or in the, in the small claims court.
[02:34:01.860 --> 02:34:08.020]  Because if these were open records, he had a duty to give those to you. He denied you
[02:34:08.020 --> 02:34:13.940]  full and free access to or enjoyment of a right and committed the act of official misconduct.
[02:34:14.500 --> 02:34:21.140]  And criminal acts are not within scope. And since they're not within scope, he has no immunity.
[02:34:22.260 --> 02:34:26.100]  Let him argue immunity in the small claims court.
[02:34:26.100 --> 02:34:32.260]  Well, it wasn't the prosecutor. It was the sheriff's department refused-
[02:34:32.260 --> 02:34:34.100]  That'll do. Yeah, whoever it is.
[02:34:34.100 --> 02:34:34.660]  Doesn't matter.
[02:34:35.220 --> 02:34:36.340]  Let's start suing him.
[02:34:36.900 --> 02:34:38.100]  It doesn't matter, yeah.
[02:34:38.100 --> 02:34:40.420]  Yeah, it don't matter if we win or not.
[02:34:41.460 --> 02:34:48.020]  Hold the top dog accountable. I like to go for the man or woman that's standing in your face.
[02:34:48.900 --> 02:34:55.860]  Whoever that man or woman, pick that name and then draw a line all the way up the org chart
[02:34:55.860 --> 02:35:02.500]  to the highest head of that whole agency or entity. Because they're the one who's
[02:35:02.500 --> 02:35:08.020]  responsible for the proper training. And so the man or woman who's standing in front of you,
[02:35:08.020 --> 02:35:15.860]  doing you wrong, stepping all over your rights is doing it as an agent of that top dog.
[02:35:15.860 --> 02:35:17.860]  So I name those two.
[02:35:18.820 --> 02:35:24.420]  Let me tell you what started me on this direction. I've been trying to figure out a way to fix this
[02:35:24.420 --> 02:35:32.580]  system for a long time. And then I hear about this kid in Colorado Springs. He's across the
[02:35:32.580 --> 02:35:39.140]  street from the sheriff's department videotaping the police department. He's videotaping them.
[02:35:40.340 --> 02:35:46.100]  They come over and arrest him and hold him for 14 hours and turn him loose. No charges.
[02:35:46.340 --> 02:35:54.980]  He sues them for 70 something thousand. In four months, they settled for $17,000.
[02:35:59.700 --> 02:36:04.980]  Would you spend 14 hours in jail for $17,000?
[02:36:04.980 --> 02:36:07.700]  No.
[02:36:09.940 --> 02:36:17.300]  I would. I spent more time in that in jail for less than that. But to keep this from happening,
[02:36:17.860 --> 02:36:22.180]  you were arrested. They cuffed you and put you in the patrol car.
[02:36:23.220 --> 02:36:23.460]  Right.
[02:36:23.460 --> 02:36:28.100]  That's false imprisonment. And for a charge of false imprisonment,
[02:36:28.660 --> 02:36:35.220]  that is one of the only things for which the state waives its sovereign immunity.
[02:36:37.860 --> 02:36:41.620]  You sue for false imprisonment, they got no immunity.
[02:36:42.980 --> 02:36:50.180]  Okay. Can I read you guys the code that he cited in order to claim that these two records were
[02:36:50.180 --> 02:36:52.740]  exempt from disclosure? Yes.
[02:36:53.540 --> 02:37:02.180]  It's short. Okay. It's 7923.600. This division does not require the disclosure of records of
[02:37:02.180 --> 02:37:10.740]  complaints or investigations conducted by records intelligence security procedures of any estate or
[02:37:10.740 --> 02:37:20.100]  local police agency or any investigatory or security files. So, I mean, they said that the
[02:37:20.740 --> 02:37:28.820]  investigation is still open, but it seems to me to kind of defy logic that if I was arrested,
[02:37:28.820 --> 02:37:34.820]  because I fit the description of the suspect, that that should be disposable to me under the
[02:37:34.820 --> 02:37:38.340]  California Public Records Act. Or am I going to have to get-
[02:37:38.340 --> 02:37:42.660]  No, no, no, no, no. Not Public Records Act. Discovery.
[02:37:44.420 --> 02:37:48.580]  Yeah. You could get at it via discovery if they were coming after you.
[02:37:49.540 --> 02:37:55.380]  But if they are legitimately still trying to find that criminal, then you don't get to,
[02:37:55.380 --> 02:38:02.020]  you as part of the public, don't get to access that record while they're doing their investigation.
[02:38:03.380 --> 02:38:10.340]  You can only get it once they've finished investigating. Then you can take a look at,
[02:38:10.340 --> 02:38:14.660]  here's all the stuff that they were told, and here's who told them and when, and
[02:38:15.220 --> 02:38:17.220]  here's who forwarded an email to whom.
[02:38:17.220 --> 02:38:20.100]  You can look at all that stuff, but not while they're investigating.
[02:38:20.740 --> 02:38:23.540]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. This is a done deal.
[02:38:25.940 --> 02:38:31.700]  No. They cuffed you and then they released you without charge.
[02:38:32.340 --> 02:38:35.380]  Yeah, that part is the unlawful restraint is over.
[02:38:35.940 --> 02:38:36.900]  That is a done deal.
[02:38:36.900 --> 02:38:41.140]  You can go after them about that. But she would have to sue them in order to have discovery.
[02:38:41.380 --> 02:38:45.700]  But yes, what I'm saying, sue them in the small claims court.
[02:38:46.260 --> 02:38:50.500]  It only costs you a few bucks. And then you can do discovery.
[02:38:51.220 --> 02:38:56.260]  Yeah. So if you sue them, then you get access to those records, not by public records,
[02:38:57.540 --> 02:39:04.100]  not by whatever the California has for public records laws, but by discovery, court discovery.
[02:39:04.100 --> 02:39:09.780]  You go into court and you compel them to disclose those records.
[02:39:10.740 --> 02:39:15.620]  Okay. So in other words, I can get discovery if I file a small claim suit.
[02:39:16.980 --> 02:39:21.380]  Yes. Oh, I didn't know that. Okay.
[02:39:22.900 --> 02:39:26.260]  It will make them so crazy if you start suing them.
[02:39:27.220 --> 02:39:31.060]  They will so hate you. They won't send you any Christmas cards.
[02:39:33.380 --> 02:39:36.100]  That's a serious drawback. You have to consider that part.
[02:39:37.060 --> 02:39:39.460]  But they also won't pull you over anymore.
[02:39:41.540 --> 02:39:47.060]  They pull up your name and they'll get this red line, diagonal line across it that says,
[02:39:47.620 --> 02:39:49.220]  do not detain.
[02:39:50.820 --> 02:39:54.740]  That has happened to me twice in the past six months. Yeah.
[02:39:56.020 --> 02:40:00.340]  That you've been stopped this way? Sue both of them.
[02:40:01.300 --> 02:40:04.260]  I'm I'm going to, I'm going to.
[02:40:06.180 --> 02:40:10.820]  With the California highway patrol, when I back my car into a ditch
[02:40:12.100 --> 02:40:18.100]  and they were harassing me for about 13 minutes and I refused to give them, well,
[02:40:18.100 --> 02:40:21.540]  he grabbed the license out of my hand, but I'm not going to get into that.
[02:40:21.540 --> 02:40:27.860]  The other time was when these guys cuffed me and then they ran my name and then they let me go.
[02:40:28.820 --> 02:40:32.020]  Oh, cops cuss you. Oh, wonderful.
[02:40:33.780 --> 02:40:39.540]  Yeah. Pardon me. The shaft that you said. Oh, wonderful. Just sue him.
[02:40:40.740 --> 02:40:44.740]  Okay. This will make this is how we're going to get control of our system.
[02:40:45.460 --> 02:40:50.660]  Of all the things I've done, nothing worked until I sued them.
[02:40:51.380 --> 02:40:55.620]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[02:40:59.140 --> 02:41:04.260]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds
[02:41:04.260 --> 02:41:09.460]  of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford
[02:41:09.460 --> 02:41:16.420]  to be on or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering
[02:41:16.420 --> 02:41:23.300]  the claims cost? The champ plan is a section one 25 IRS approved preventative health plan
[02:41:23.300 --> 02:41:30.020]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all
[02:41:30.020 --> 02:41:36.660]  at zero cost with zero copay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by
[02:41:36.660 --> 02:41:42.740]  paying less than FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars
[02:41:42.740 --> 02:41:49.780]  in matching FICA taxes. The champ plan can help add working capital market resale value or pay
[02:41:49.780 --> 02:42:01.460]  down lines of credit. Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or Dallas MMS.com. Are you the plaintiff or
[02:42:01.460 --> 02:42:07.620]  defendant in a lawsuit? When your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable,
[02:42:07.620 --> 02:42:14.980]  easy to understand, four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you
[02:42:14.980 --> 02:42:20.500]  have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you
[02:42:20.500 --> 02:42:26.580]  should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[02:42:27.140 --> 02:42:33.060]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[02:42:33.700 --> 02:42:39.220]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[02:42:39.220 --> 02:42:45.940]  and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[02:42:45.940 --> 02:42:54.340]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[02:42:54.340 --> 02:42:59.620]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[02:43:25.300 --> 02:43:31.940]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to
[02:43:33.780 --> 02:43:40.260]  Teresa in California. Okay, this is, when 30 years trying to
[02:43:41.780 --> 02:43:48.420]  figure out how to fix this system, I have filed more criminal complaints that I can count.
[02:43:49.940 --> 02:43:53.460]  Been beat up, thrown in jail more times than I remember.
[02:43:54.740 --> 02:44:00.980]  Three dislocated ribs, two broken collarbones, tipped elbow, and a tooth knocked out.
[02:44:02.820 --> 02:44:09.460]  And none of that did any good until I sued them. And in Brett sued them.
[02:44:11.300 --> 02:44:16.900]  And Glenn Willingham sued them. That makes them nuts.
[02:44:17.540 --> 02:44:23.940]  So I like the idea of suing them for bull crap.
[02:44:26.420 --> 02:44:33.140]  What I was doing with criminal complaints is I would go in and get them to do something so I
[02:44:33.140 --> 02:44:37.220]  could file criminal charges against them. Well, that worked pretty good. That really got their
[02:44:37.220 --> 02:44:44.100]  attention. But when I sent a criminal complaint to the Chief Justice of the Supreme against the
[02:44:44.180 --> 02:44:52.020]  governor and demanded that he issue warrants, and when he didn't, since the law commanded him to do
[02:44:52.020 --> 02:44:59.140]  it, that made it an ministerial duty for which he had no immunity. I sued him in the federal
[02:44:59.140 --> 02:45:06.900]  court for $20 million. And it was clear to him later that I played him like a cheap fiddle.
[02:45:06.900 --> 02:45:13.060]  And that's what made him the most angry is that I played him.
[02:45:14.180 --> 02:45:22.340]  So you get these guys to stop you and sue them the next day. We have a guy in San Antonio
[02:45:22.980 --> 02:45:31.620]  went in and to a JP and filed a criminal complaints against a municipal judge.
[02:45:32.580 --> 02:45:39.620]  And the JP refused to issue a warrant. When he told the bailiff to arrest the judge,
[02:45:39.620 --> 02:45:41.700]  the judge had the bailiff throw him out of the building.
[02:45:42.900 --> 02:45:48.100]  So he went to the next JP and within, what did he say, Brett, 36 minutes?
[02:45:50.580 --> 02:45:54.100]  36 minutes. Yeah, I don't know exactly, but yeah, it was pretty quick.
[02:45:55.380 --> 02:46:00.500]  After he was thrown out of this JP refused to issue a warrant and threw him out of the
[02:46:00.500 --> 02:46:06.740]  courthouse. He went to the next courthouse and sued him within 36 minutes.
[02:46:08.740 --> 02:46:13.700]  And you know, as soon as he left the JP's office, this JP called the one he sued.
[02:46:14.500 --> 02:46:21.540]  So the guy knew. This guy came and did that to me and had that suit in his hand.
[02:46:23.220 --> 02:46:28.500]  Played me like a cheap fiddle. Nobody likes to be played.
[02:46:30.820 --> 02:46:35.140]  If we start doing that to them, they're going to start getting really careful.
[02:46:36.660 --> 02:46:37.860]  What do you think, Theresa?
[02:46:39.300 --> 02:46:46.180]  Well, I've called in to you guys before and I was in the, when they arrested me,
[02:46:46.980 --> 02:46:55.460]  I had a multi-million dollar lawsuit filed against Monterey County. So I've found that.
[02:46:55.460 --> 02:46:57.700]  I knew I liked you for some reason.
[02:46:58.420 --> 02:47:01.620]  Yeah, I'm the lady that got arrested on the beach. Remember?
[02:47:02.180 --> 02:47:05.620]  Oh, okay. You won that one, didn't you?
[02:47:06.580 --> 02:47:16.660]  No. He, let's see, despite the fact that I've been reporting all of the rules of
[02:47:16.660 --> 02:47:22.740]  discovery that they violated and all this evidence that they destroyed when I had
[02:47:22.740 --> 02:47:29.300]  requested it prior to litigation and told them to preserve it. And they destroyed like 70% of it
[02:47:29.300 --> 02:47:34.820]  anyway. And I'm also the woman that found that the attorney had been practicing law
[02:47:34.820 --> 02:47:38.740]  outside jurisdiction. Is this ringing a bell for you guys?
[02:47:39.380 --> 02:47:41.460]  Yes. Oh, I know exactly who you are now.
[02:47:42.900 --> 02:47:52.100]  Okay. And then the judge wound up dismissing my case because I didn't comply with discovery.
[02:47:52.980 --> 02:47:58.820]  And he never acknowledged all that destruction. But he did wind up.
[02:48:00.820 --> 02:48:06.980]  I had three, through my research, I didn't do it. Through my research, I had three attorneys
[02:48:07.780 --> 02:48:14.660]  sanctioned. One lost his 20-year partnership in the firm. He's been referred over to the
[02:48:14.660 --> 02:48:19.540]  professional standards committee. What is it? Standards committee on professional conduct.
[02:48:20.260 --> 02:48:22.580]  And his entire firm was as well.
[02:48:23.780 --> 02:48:30.340]  Have you sued him? Lawyers are low-hanging fruit.
[02:48:31.700 --> 02:48:37.060]  You're like you when you get in an accident. You're driving along and somebody bashes into
[02:48:37.060 --> 02:48:41.860]  you and blames you for it. And you swear on a stack of Bibles it wasn't your fault and
[02:48:41.860 --> 02:48:45.940]  your insurance company don't care. They're gonna pay the claim.
[02:48:45.940 --> 02:48:56.420]  I had a lawyer tell me that if somebody sues me, I want the insurance company just to pay them,
[02:48:56.420 --> 02:49:03.940]  get it off my plate. So I'm going to other things. So you sue the lawyer, the insurance
[02:49:03.940 --> 02:49:08.260]  carrier takes over the suit. I think in this case, it's California, it'll be the bar.
[02:49:08.260 --> 02:49:18.500]  Okay. And they're likely to write you a check to keep it from costing them more for litigation
[02:49:18.500 --> 02:49:26.500]  because their lawyers cost a couple hundred bucks an hour. Yeah. So you sue them for a lot and then
[02:49:27.220 --> 02:49:31.780]  offer to settle for a little. They write you a check and you go out and get them to screw
[02:49:31.780 --> 02:49:41.700]  something up so you can sue them again. But if you got him sanctioned, suing him is dead bang.
[02:49:43.940 --> 02:49:50.260]  Okay. So I want to go back to what Brett was saying before. I think both of you guys were
[02:49:50.260 --> 02:49:58.820]  saying before to sue them in small claims. Am I suing the custodian of records for not disclosing
[02:49:58.820 --> 02:50:05.780]  those two records or am I suing the deputies because you can't appeal a small claim suit
[02:50:05.780 --> 02:50:12.340]  in California? You can't appeal a small claims?
[02:50:13.700 --> 02:50:21.060]  No, you can't appeal. How much does it cost to sue them in the county court?
[02:50:21.060 --> 02:50:30.820]  I can't remember. There's two different tiers, one for
[02:50:31.540 --> 02:50:38.420]  limited civil liability and then for unlimited. And maybe the one is $75 and I don't remember
[02:50:38.420 --> 02:50:44.820]  what the other one is. That's not bad. Last time I sued in the county court in Texas,
[02:50:44.820 --> 02:50:53.220]  it cost me just over 400 bucks. That was too much. That's why I was doing small claims.
[02:50:56.420 --> 02:51:00.420]  Okay, but if I do it in the state court, then I would be able to appeal.
[02:51:00.980 --> 02:51:08.740]  Okay. And then I could get the discovery because what happened was they knew that the woman's name
[02:51:08.740 --> 02:51:16.420]  was Sophia, the suspect that robbed the store. And as soon as they approached me, they said,
[02:51:16.420 --> 02:51:26.180]  is your name Teresa? So they knew that I didn't even have the name of the suspect. And what these
[02:51:26.180 --> 02:51:34.660]  adults did, they put in their police report. She immediately became defensive and refused to
[02:51:34.660 --> 02:51:41.300]  identify herself. She requested an attorney and wanted to invoke her rights to remain silent
[02:51:41.300 --> 02:51:47.140]  while also threatening to sue the Monterey County Sheriff's Office. Bacola boasted she was involved
[02:51:47.140 --> 02:51:51.860]  in multiple multimillion dollar lawsuits against various entities of Monterey County.
[02:51:56.340 --> 02:51:58.900]  Wow. They just went ahead and put it right in there.
[02:51:58.900 --> 02:52:09.060]  Okay. Yes. So yeah, who am I suing? Am I suing? Oh, you said, okay, it's the state court. Okay.
[02:52:09.060 --> 02:52:19.620]  The other question I have is, do you have to identify if they are looking for a thief in the area?
[02:52:20.020 --> 02:52:26.980]  No. No. But wait, don't get past this part of, you have these other things and they said they know
[02:52:26.980 --> 02:52:31.940]  that you have these other things going on because that means that when you do sue them,
[02:52:32.900 --> 02:52:39.300]  you get to ring them up not only for this unlawful restraint, false arrest, or whatever California
[02:52:39.300 --> 02:52:49.540]  calls it, you get to also ring them up for the witness intimidation. And I think that's
[02:52:50.260 --> 02:52:56.260]  the retaliation and obstruction of justice and witness intimidation that's involved with
[02:52:56.980 --> 02:53:04.020]  going after you because you're going after them. That's retaliation. Yeah.
[02:53:04.900 --> 02:53:07.540]  They're trying to shut you up because you're a potential witness.
[02:53:08.420 --> 02:53:12.580]  Yeah. If they're trying to shut you up, that's tampering with witness.
[02:53:12.580 --> 02:53:27.380]  Yes. Okay. Yeah, because he also tried a gander at my last name. He said,
[02:53:28.500 --> 02:53:35.700]  I mean, they clearly knew who I was. No, pardon me. He didn't. He didn't have my last name correct.
[02:53:35.700 --> 02:53:42.340]  He said, are you Teresa Bungalow? And that's not my last name. So clearly,
[02:53:42.980 --> 02:53:48.980]  I did not fit the description of the suspect. And I went to talk to the woman that got robbed
[02:53:48.980 --> 02:53:56.740]  and she said, you don't look anything like her. She has long frizzy brown hair and a big butt.
[02:53:58.340 --> 02:54:03.380]  And she's shorter. If I remember your picture, you did not have a big butt.
[02:54:03.940 --> 02:54:08.340]  I don't think I've ever had a picture of my butt online, but.
[02:54:09.780 --> 02:54:15.380]  Well, your general structure, you were rather petite, as I recall.
[02:54:15.940 --> 02:54:20.820]  Back out of it, Randy. I am squealing in reverse.
[02:54:25.780 --> 02:54:27.860]  Open mouth, insert foot.
[02:54:27.860 --> 02:54:36.580]  We do not have to identify if they are investigating a crime.
[02:54:39.860 --> 02:54:44.900]  No. They can investigate all they want to, but that doesn't mean you are compelled to
[02:54:44.900 --> 02:54:51.380]  give them evidence. They can investigate. These guys are doing these audits.
[02:54:52.100 --> 02:54:57.460]  The cop says they're investigating. He said, well, I have no duty to help you investigate.
[02:54:57.460 --> 02:55:03.780]  So go investigate. Don't bother me. Right. And if he wants to investigate,
[02:55:03.780 --> 02:55:10.660]  and let's say he's trying to look inside some box and you're getting in blocking and
[02:55:10.660 --> 02:55:15.860]  physically preventing him from looking in that box, now you're obstructing him.
[02:55:17.220 --> 02:55:23.540]  But if all you're doing is you're being silent because you refuse to be compelled to give
[02:55:23.540 --> 02:55:28.180]  evidence, well, that's not, you're not bothering his investigation.
[02:55:30.260 --> 02:55:35.380]  Okay, great. And then they can't threaten me and from, I mean, it was really scary.
[02:55:37.300 --> 02:55:43.780]  Of course. And well, you're saying what they can do, and there's what they may and what they
[02:55:43.780 --> 02:55:47.860]  do, two different things. But hold that thought. We'll be right back.
[02:55:54.020 --> 02:55:59.940]  America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[02:55:59.940 --> 02:56:05.140]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[02:56:05.140 --> 02:56:09.700]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to
[02:56:09.700 --> 02:56:15.540]  know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three volume set called basic
[02:56:15.540 --> 02:56:20.500]  elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life
[02:56:20.500 --> 02:56:26.900]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[02:56:26.900 --> 02:56:32.420]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life,
[02:56:32.900 --> 02:56:39.540]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[02:56:39.540 --> 02:56:48.180]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[02:56:48.900 --> 02:56:57.380]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[02:57:01.140 --> 02:57:04.820]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution.
[02:57:04.820 --> 02:57:09.540]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on
[02:57:09.540 --> 02:57:14.100]  it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of
[02:57:14.180 --> 02:57:19.940]  your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[02:57:19.940 --> 02:57:25.060]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will
[02:57:25.060 --> 02:57:30.900]  start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[02:57:30.900 --> 02:57:36.420]  yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[02:57:36.420 --> 02:57:43.060]  startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with
[02:57:43.060 --> 02:57:49.620]  startpage. Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find
[02:57:49.620 --> 02:57:54.340]  a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. That
[02:57:54.340 --> 02:57:59.060]  shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the third amendment was designed
[02:57:59.060 --> 02:58:04.260]  to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[02:58:04.260 --> 02:58:09.540]  the days of our founding fathers. Third party, third amendment, get it? So if you answer a knock
[02:58:09.540 --> 02:58:14.100]  at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the bill of
[02:58:14.100 --> 02:58:19.140]  rights and reread the third amendment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at
[02:58:19.140 --> 02:58:34.900]  CatherineAlbrecht.com. The bill of rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution. They
[02:58:34.900 --> 02:58:39.780]  guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[02:58:39.780 --> 02:58:44.260]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your
[02:58:44.260 --> 02:58:50.500]  constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never
[02:58:50.500 --> 02:58:56.500]  get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:58:56.500 --> 02:59:02.660]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[02:59:02.660 --> 02:59:07.860]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[02:59:07.860 --> 02:59:13.860]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[02:59:15.540 --> 02:59:19.940]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of
[02:59:19.940 --> 02:59:24.980]  x-ray goggles. That imagery reminds me that the fourth amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[02:59:24.980 --> 02:59:30.260]  from unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[02:59:30.260 --> 02:59:34.500]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our fourth amendment rights in the name of security.
[02:59:34.500 --> 02:59:40.100]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees
[02:59:40.100 --> 02:59:45.140]  demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional
[02:59:45.140 --> 02:59:49.940]  alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their
[02:59:49.940 --> 02:59:55.620]  googly eyes to take a gander at the fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[02:59:55.620 --> 02:59:58.980]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:00:25.620 --> 03:00:54.580]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brat Fountain Rula Radio on this
[03:00:55.620 --> 03:01:03.300]  Friday, the 17th day of January 2025. And we're talking to Teresa in California.
[03:01:04.260 --> 03:01:10.180]  And Teresa has been beating him up big deal. You know big time, you know Bob in California,
[03:01:10.180 --> 03:01:11.300]  don't you? I do.
[03:01:13.300 --> 03:01:23.540]  That guy sent me a picture of his humanoid operation. That is just wrong.
[03:01:24.340 --> 03:01:28.820]  I will never get that image scraped off the back of my eyeball.
[03:01:32.580 --> 03:01:36.020]  Yeah, I think we went through this on the last time I called in.
[03:01:38.820 --> 03:01:42.340]  Okay, yeah, I know who you are now. I remember seeing a picture of you.
[03:01:44.340 --> 03:01:48.580]  Yeah, okay, so I want to read you a few of the other things that they wrote in the report.
[03:01:49.140 --> 03:01:56.740]  I conducted, these guys are so dumb. I conducted the pat search of her outer clothing
[03:01:56.740 --> 03:02:02.500]  and placed Teresa in the backseat of my patrol vehicle. I advised her once more she was not
[03:02:02.500 --> 03:02:08.100]  under arrest, but she was still detained until we could determine her identity. She stated she
[03:02:08.100 --> 03:02:13.140]  refused to identify herself because she wanted her attorney present. There they go again,
[03:02:13.780 --> 03:02:19.700]  admitting that I was invoking my six-minute right, for she believed she was being placed under
[03:02:19.700 --> 03:02:27.940]  arrest for suspicion of burglary. Deputy Bradford advised Teresa she was mandated by law to provide
[03:02:27.940 --> 03:02:34.420]  her identifying information while being lawfully detained by law enforcement. She still refused to
[03:02:34.420 --> 03:02:40.660]  identify herself. Oh, he has, so he's admitted in his statement.
[03:02:44.100 --> 03:02:45.940]  That he lied to you.
[03:02:48.740 --> 03:02:54.020]  He was, he admitted you were being detained. He didn't, he said lawfully, but that don't mean
[03:02:54.020 --> 03:03:01.540]  it was lawfully. Right. Well, it's also interesting that if he's, if he's saying that you've got all
[03:03:01.540 --> 03:03:07.860]  these actions against the city and county and whatever, well then clearly he knows your name.
[03:03:07.860 --> 03:03:16.260]  Well, it was, no, what wound up happening was before they threw the cuffs on, I said, you know,
[03:03:16.260 --> 03:03:20.580]  you guys should probably call somebody to find out who I am first because I already have a
[03:03:20.580 --> 03:03:26.740]  multi-million dollar lawsuit against the county. And I think it was Bradford who kind of rolled
[03:03:26.740 --> 03:03:33.940]  his eyes and he said something like, yeah, lawsuits, sure. Cause they probably thought I was
[03:03:33.940 --> 03:03:40.820]  blown smoke. And I don't, you know, and I, and actually right before I walked away, I said,
[03:03:40.820 --> 03:03:44.980]  yeah, I'm going to be in action in the federal court in San Jose on Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock
[03:03:44.980 --> 03:03:50.420]  if you guys want to come, because we had a hearing. So no, I wasn't blown, I wasn't blown
[03:03:50.420 --> 03:03:57.780]  smoke up their ass. Now it's their turn. He admitted they arrested you.
[03:03:57.780 --> 03:04:06.020]  He said it was lawful. That doesn't mean it was lawful. He patted you down.
[03:04:08.340 --> 03:04:10.340]  You interpret that as fondling.
[03:04:12.980 --> 03:04:15.700]  It is fondling. He had his hands all over my butt.
[03:04:19.860 --> 03:04:22.820]  Well, I saw your picture. That was no big deal.
[03:04:23.220 --> 03:04:28.100]  I'm recovering, Brett. I'm recovering. Did you just stick the other foot in there?
[03:04:28.100 --> 03:04:35.060]  No, no, no. I'm saying she didn't have a big butt. Trying to recover from earlier.
[03:04:39.780 --> 03:04:46.260]  She's one of those tiny women like my wife. Those tiny women are mean, mean, mean.
[03:04:46.420 --> 03:04:51.220]  Those tiny women are mean, mean, mean. Okay, anyway.
[03:04:53.540 --> 03:04:56.100]  So I'm thinking of what you could sue him for.
[03:04:57.780 --> 03:05:00.020]  Doesn't matter what you can prove up. Who cares?
[03:05:01.140 --> 03:05:04.100]  Well, they already wrote it in their stupid report.
[03:05:06.500 --> 03:05:09.140]  So sue him in the small claims court.
[03:05:09.140 --> 03:05:18.820]  Let them try to bring up any claims they want to. That's false imprisonment. False imprisonment,
[03:05:19.460 --> 03:05:26.980]  no immunity. Or sue him in that county court that costs like 75 bucks.
[03:05:28.260 --> 03:05:33.860]  So you've got the ability to appeal it out. So they're not going to want you to do that.
[03:05:34.820 --> 03:05:38.020]  So they're likely to write you a check just to get you to leave them alone.
[03:05:38.820 --> 03:05:45.460]  Since you have a history of suing them, they'll know you like it. And if you can force them to
[03:05:45.460 --> 03:05:51.700]  make a deal, then that looks good for you. Okay. Okay.
[03:05:51.700 --> 03:05:55.380]  They can complain about you suing a whole lot if you lose them all.
[03:05:56.740 --> 03:06:01.700]  But if you deal them out, then they don't get to complain about it. That means you're outstanding.
[03:06:01.700 --> 03:06:12.420]  Well, I just filed a notes of appeal on the other case. And I was just,
[03:06:13.540 --> 03:06:20.020]  I want to tell you guys that in the report, they have, I didn't give them any of this.
[03:06:20.020 --> 03:06:28.500]  They have my date of birth, my driver's license, my address. They shouldn't, I mean, isn't that a
[03:06:28.500 --> 03:06:32.260]  violation of my fourth amendment, right? Because I didn't give them all that stuff.
[03:06:34.980 --> 03:06:42.420]  I mean, if they were able to pull it from public records, where did they get that?
[03:06:44.180 --> 03:06:49.540]  Well, like I said, I've been taken there twice already, which is the reason I was suing the
[03:06:49.540 --> 03:06:55.220]  county. What I mean, did they recognize you and they just remembered that that was you or
[03:06:56.180 --> 03:07:00.420]  were you, did you have a car that had a registration, the plates,
[03:07:01.940 --> 03:07:06.260]  you look up the plates and it leads back to you? What was the, how did they get
[03:07:07.700 --> 03:07:11.220]  from pretending like they need to know who you are, but they already know who you are?
[03:07:12.340 --> 03:07:18.500]  Well, it only came out in their report later. And no, I wasn't in my car. I was just walking.
[03:07:19.220 --> 03:07:25.460]  And so I assume that they got all of that information from their jail
[03:07:25.460 --> 03:07:28.980]  system because I'm in the book there. I have been booked.
[03:07:30.660 --> 03:07:36.580]  But is that, I mean, do they have a right to access all those files because I just gave them my name?
[03:07:38.580 --> 03:07:45.060]  Yes, the police can. If they're doing an investigation, they can.
[03:07:45.460 --> 03:07:53.140]  No, they would have to have a search warrant. And the search warrant would have to be established
[03:07:53.140 --> 03:07:58.180]  based on probable cause. There'd have to be a crime. They'd have to go to the judge and say,
[03:07:58.180 --> 03:08:03.620]  hey, this lady fits the description, whatever, and convince the judge to sign a search warrant
[03:08:03.620 --> 03:08:07.620]  and let them do some, otherwise it's just a phishing expedition.
[03:08:08.180 --> 03:08:13.940]  Not to do a once in warrants. They can do a once in warrants without.
[03:08:14.020 --> 03:08:15.220]  Yeah, but they didn't have her name.
[03:08:16.900 --> 03:08:18.180]  No, I gave them my name.
[03:08:20.260 --> 03:08:23.540]  Oh, I thought you said you only gave them your last name.
[03:08:25.140 --> 03:08:30.100]  No, my first and last name so that they wouldn't take me to jail and they would
[03:08:30.100 --> 03:08:36.180]  take me out of the handcuffs and out of the car. Okay. Well, you need to get clear on what
[03:08:36.260 --> 03:08:45.300]  specifically California requires for, is California one of these stop and identify states?
[03:08:45.860 --> 03:08:46.660]  No, it is not.
[03:08:47.540 --> 03:08:52.900]  Okay. And you need to get clear on what constitutes an identification
[03:08:53.940 --> 03:08:58.820]  because they might demand certain things that you don't have to give them. You might,
[03:08:58.820 --> 03:09:04.900]  for example, need to only give them your name, address and date of birth, but they'll ask for
[03:09:04.900 --> 03:09:12.180]  more, you know, so just get clear on what those items are. But yeah, once they have
[03:09:12.180 --> 03:09:22.340]  a little bit, they can look up the rest. Okay. Okay. All right, gentlemen, I think that's it
[03:09:22.340 --> 03:09:26.980]  for me. Okay. All right. Well, thanks for calling.
[03:09:28.020 --> 03:09:34.020]  Thank you. Keep up the good work. I will. I will. All right. Good night.
[03:09:34.980 --> 03:09:38.340]  Okay. Now we're going to Eric in Massachusetts. Hello, Eric.
[03:09:39.460 --> 03:09:42.740]  You were going to explain to us the common law.
[03:09:43.620 --> 03:09:47.460]  I'll explain it to you. It's not that hard. It really isn't. It does, you know,
[03:09:47.460 --> 03:09:51.460]  sort of take a little bit to wrap your head around, but it's not that complicated.
[03:09:51.460 --> 03:09:57.220]  So let's start with the patriot. This will only take a few minutes. So let's start with the
[03:09:57.220 --> 03:10:06.180]  patriot mythos guys, right? So for example, if you went to an insane asylum, right? And would you
[03:10:06.180 --> 03:10:11.620]  expect to be able to explain the lot, logically explain what these people thought? Of course not
[03:10:11.620 --> 03:10:17.780]  because they're insane. Now, patriot mythos people are, as all three of us would agree,
[03:10:17.780 --> 03:10:23.860]  they're undereducated. They don't know what they're talking about. So we can't expect them
[03:10:23.860 --> 03:10:30.500]  to understand what common law is. We can't expect them to have a grasp of the law system at all.
[03:10:30.500 --> 03:10:34.820]  So what these people are doing, which we're all sort of guilty of at some point,
[03:10:35.940 --> 03:10:43.060]  is we're trying to grasp a magic wand, a magic word that will open up the gate
[03:10:43.700 --> 03:10:50.500]  to the law that we think we deserve, right? Right, right. It's the, this is how they get you.
[03:10:51.460 --> 03:10:56.820]  If you just say this or just hold your tongue right, sign at an angle. Now they can't get you.
[03:10:58.100 --> 03:11:03.940]  Right. Exactly. Because we, in sort of the common law, common sense, we think, well,
[03:11:03.940 --> 03:11:08.820]  this is the way it's supposed to be. So there's this magic wand. Now, Randy, have you ever seen
[03:11:08.820 --> 03:11:16.260]  the movie Fantasia? Are you a little bit older than that movie? In that movie, in that movie,
[03:11:16.820 --> 03:11:22.340]  Mickey Mouse picks up the magic wand, but that didn't make him a magician, did it?
[03:11:23.060 --> 03:11:30.500]  What did it do? It caused a lot of problems, a big giant mess until the actual magician came along
[03:11:30.500 --> 03:11:36.260]  and had to unwind everything that Mickey Mouse was doing. So all these Patriot mythos guys,
[03:11:36.260 --> 03:11:42.340]  they pick up the magic wand and create a big giant problem. So everything that they do,
[03:11:42.980 --> 03:11:48.180]  you can't make it logical and you can't rationalize it and you just have to discount it
[03:11:48.180 --> 03:11:51.540]  because they're looking for the magic wand. All right. So that's the Patriot mythos.
[03:11:52.820 --> 03:11:58.980]  If you read through common, through a lot of stuff, you see common law, they use the term
[03:11:58.980 --> 03:12:07.860]  common law. Common law is both sort of logic, what we as Western society Christians, Christian based
[03:12:07.860 --> 03:12:17.380]  law system, as this makes sense to us, and what is case law. So case law is common law, but not
[03:12:17.380 --> 03:12:25.460]  all common law is necessarily case law. You can still sort of plead something as common law,
[03:12:25.460 --> 03:12:32.820]  but as your inclination is to believe, it's not going to be easy because you're in the realm of
[03:12:33.780 --> 03:12:43.460]  equity. The courts, especially the higher courts, will look at things sort of in an equitable manner,
[03:12:43.460 --> 03:12:53.540]  which is not hard facts. There's a little bit of room there. And Alexis, our friend Alexis,
[03:12:53.540 --> 03:12:59.140]  he found a case, which is probably a good example. I'm assuming it exists. I didn't see it myself.
[03:12:59.220 --> 03:13:06.260]  So Dr. Kevorkian. So he went up in trial three times in Michigan. The first two times,
[03:13:06.260 --> 03:13:12.180]  they tried to take him, as I understand it, as I remember, they tried to take him under law.
[03:13:13.380 --> 03:13:19.540]  But there is no law. There was no law for assisted suicide. He's not doing the work.
[03:13:20.500 --> 03:13:26.260]  He's just letting the other guy do the work. But the Michigan attorney general, supposedly,
[03:13:26.900 --> 03:13:32.820]  brought him a third time under common law. And what would that make? What would that be?
[03:13:32.820 --> 03:13:38.180]  The common law would be, well, you help somebody kill somebody. You help somebody kill themselves.
[03:13:39.540 --> 03:13:45.060]  That's common law. You can't help somebody kill themselves. Does that make sense?
[03:13:46.500 --> 03:13:52.180]  No, I'm more confused now than when you started. No, not at all.
[03:13:52.180 --> 03:13:58.180]  Okay, let's get it on the other side. Randy Calvert, Fountain.
[03:14:52.180 --> 03:15:04.180]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so
[03:15:04.180 --> 03:15:08.820]  addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed. I'd be lost without
[03:15:08.820 --> 03:15:13.460]  logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a
[03:15:13.460 --> 03:15:17.860]  show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I
[03:15:17.860 --> 03:15:23.380]  spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you
[03:15:23.380 --> 03:15:28.340]  order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. You can order your supplies or holiday gifts.
[03:15:28.340 --> 03:15:35.700]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo
[03:15:35.700 --> 03:15:41.620]  and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few
[03:15:41.620 --> 03:15:47.220]  pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use
[03:15:47.220 --> 03:15:53.300]  my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[03:15:53.300 --> 03:15:59.220]  This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy holidays, logos.
[03:16:48.180 --> 03:16:53.300]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, beautiful radio. And it may be Eric,
[03:16:53.300 --> 03:17:00.500]  you're talking faster than I can listen. Luckily, we record the program so you can listen to it a
[03:17:00.500 --> 03:17:13.060]  bunch of times. I'll give you another one. Tort law, I'm guessing, is essentially common law
[03:17:13.060 --> 03:17:18.820]  because there's no laws that say you can't slander somebody, right? I could be wrong,
[03:17:18.820 --> 03:17:24.500]  but a lot of- Yeah, there are. Well, there's not laws that say you can't slander. There are
[03:17:24.500 --> 03:17:32.420]  laws that say that if you do slander, you are subject to being- Yeah, the flandery has a cause
[03:17:32.420 --> 03:17:42.980]  of action. Right, but again, correct me. I haven't researched it fully, but that's all from case law
[03:17:43.060 --> 03:17:52.340]  law, right? There's not- Yes, yes. As a matter of fact, it is. Yes. I don't know. I think it
[03:17:52.340 --> 03:17:58.820]  goes way back before that too, for America, straight out of the Bible. Slander is a cause
[03:17:58.820 --> 03:18:09.700]  of action. So it's from the common law, but it has been codified into a cause of action.
[03:18:10.660 --> 03:18:17.460]  Exactly. Right. But all of the common law has been, for the most part, the common law has been
[03:18:17.460 --> 03:18:24.020]  codified into either civil causes of action or criminal statutes.
[03:18:27.140 --> 03:18:33.940]  Okay. At least my understanding of it. Yeah, criminal causes of action would be crimes,
[03:18:33.940 --> 03:18:47.620]  so criminal offenses. But there's lots of torts that I think are strictly from case law. And again,
[03:18:47.620 --> 03:18:55.620]  I could be wrong, but- Yeah, I'm sure the truth there are. Well, I think when you get into some
[03:18:55.620 --> 03:19:02.980]  of the newer things, then you'll find that to be more and more true. Because as the society develops
[03:19:02.980 --> 03:19:11.220]  more, then it needs more things like, yeah, they violated, there was a copyright infringement.
[03:19:11.860 --> 03:19:19.060]  They stepped on my trademark or something. And then those start to become more and more distant
[03:19:19.060 --> 03:19:25.620]  from common law. People treat each other how you want to be treated. It starts to become more
[03:19:25.620 --> 03:19:33.460]  distant from what is innately the right and wrong way to be to each other.
[03:19:35.780 --> 03:19:40.660]  That's philosophically what common law is. I'm more interested in common law
[03:19:41.460 --> 03:19:48.500]  as in terms of how it's used. And looked at a court case where the judge said they couldn't touch
[03:19:48.500 --> 03:19:55.940]  this case because it was cited in a common law court. What is a common law court? Convene one.
[03:19:55.940 --> 03:20:03.300]  What are the rules? What are the structures? I think Alex is correct, and you have to look at
[03:20:03.300 --> 03:20:10.740]  black law. But from what I've seen a lot of times when the courts are referencing common law,
[03:20:11.460 --> 03:20:15.300]  they're referencing case law. And I made a post.
[03:20:15.300 --> 03:20:21.060]  I don't think so. I think they're referencing principles.
[03:20:21.060 --> 03:20:33.540]  The courts, they want us to think that their case law is common law. It's not.
[03:20:33.700 --> 03:20:43.700]  But what common law, in case law, is case law. Case law is judicial decisions based on applications
[03:20:43.700 --> 03:20:51.620]  of statutory law. Statutory law is the sovereign's law, not the common law. They made that distinct,
[03:20:51.700 --> 03:21:03.220]  common law. They made that distinct, what do you call it, Brett? Agnacarta libertatum made that
[03:21:03.220 --> 03:21:13.380]  distinction that if the sovereign issued an order or edict and it was not compatible with
[03:21:13.380 --> 03:21:20.340]  the common law, the magistrates were forbidden to enforce sovereign's edict. So the common law
[03:21:20.340 --> 03:21:33.460]  was different. Rather, our statutory law is a problem with words. It is the sovereign law,
[03:21:33.460 --> 03:21:39.620]  but we're the sovereign. So just for the sovereign, we're the common people.
[03:21:40.740 --> 03:21:47.620]  It's our law. It's not like we have a king who can issue ediction. So
[03:21:47.620 --> 03:22:00.100]  all law, I look at it as common law. It's just our legislature has taken common law and defined it,
[03:22:01.860 --> 03:22:02.580]  specified it.
[03:22:02.580 --> 03:22:09.620]  Common law is defined as unwritten law. I think Alex said that, and I agree with that.
[03:22:09.620 --> 03:22:15.140]  It's unwritten law is not law. That's a contradiction of terms.
[03:22:16.100 --> 03:22:19.460]  It's unstated. There's no statute to it.
[03:22:21.780 --> 03:22:28.740]  And it has no, it's not law, it's custom. And that's what Agnacarta said it was.
[03:22:30.100 --> 03:22:30.600]  Okay.
[03:22:33.060 --> 03:22:36.020]  It was the customs of people. That was the common law.
[03:22:36.020 --> 03:22:45.220]  But all the little we have done as the commoners and the sovereign is we took that common law
[03:22:45.860 --> 03:22:51.860]  and ask our legislators and legislators and our judges,
[03:22:53.220 --> 03:22:56.180]  legislatures first to take this common law.
[03:22:57.140 --> 03:23:02.980]  Murder was a common law crime. Take that crime and define it, specify it.
[03:23:03.940 --> 03:23:08.580]  So we can be more accurate in wielding the common law.
[03:23:09.940 --> 03:23:15.780]  But at this point, these guys come in and they're going to use a common law court.
[03:23:16.740 --> 03:23:22.340]  Okay, just exactly how do you convene a common law court?
[03:23:23.380 --> 03:23:24.580]  Right, great question.
[03:23:26.340 --> 03:23:28.420]  This is what we've always been looking for.
[03:23:28.420 --> 03:23:32.820]  Then I get this song and dance and seltzer down your pants.
[03:23:34.020 --> 03:23:37.060]  Again, I think you're trying to rationalize uneducated people's
[03:23:37.060 --> 03:23:42.020]  opinion on our common law court. 800 years ago might have been a jury.
[03:23:42.740 --> 03:23:48.180]  And that's what they considered a common law court, which is kind of what Alex said.
[03:23:49.460 --> 03:23:50.260]  So I can see.
[03:23:50.260 --> 03:23:55.940]  Yeah. Well, the way I explained it, I did some research on it recently,
[03:23:56.260 --> 03:24:04.260]  is like the older cultures, when someone did something wrong, they brought up people.
[03:24:05.780 --> 03:24:13.300]  And they made their arguments before the people and the people ruled. They decided what to do.
[03:24:14.500 --> 03:24:20.340]  If it was dunking the witch 50 times or burning them at the stake or whatever,
[03:24:21.300 --> 03:24:23.380]  people decided it was the common law.
[03:24:24.900 --> 03:24:32.260]  But as we became more sophisticated, then we had more people doing bad things and
[03:24:32.820 --> 03:24:37.380]  couldn't get the whole community together all at once. So we started picking groups
[03:24:38.180 --> 03:24:47.540]  of people from the common people, your peers. And that turned into a jury of our peers.
[03:24:48.260 --> 03:24:51.620]  Here, I have a, go ahead.
[03:24:51.620 --> 03:24:57.620]  If anything is common law, that's it. Thomas Jefferson said,
[03:24:58.420 --> 03:25:04.580]  best remedy to bad law is a jury who cannot enforce it. Judges want to say,
[03:25:06.020 --> 03:25:10.580]  jury determines the facts, judge determines the law.
[03:25:10.580 --> 03:25:14.580]  Horse manure, jury determines both of them.
[03:25:16.260 --> 03:25:23.220]  They, the judges want to take control of the law, take it away from the common law.
[03:25:23.220 --> 03:25:30.980]  And common law is still the jury. And it's still in law, the jury determines the facts and the law.
[03:25:33.940 --> 03:25:38.660]  Judges are trying to take that, and that's one of the fights I wanna get to, but just not yet.
[03:25:38.660 --> 03:25:41.940]  So if we have common law, it's the jury's.
[03:25:44.500 --> 03:25:45.220]  Don't have any-
[03:25:45.220 --> 03:25:54.740]  Let's see here about this, the Black's law dictionary that we were trying to hear about earlier
[03:25:55.460 --> 03:26:02.340]  and the cases that support this definition. There's a piece of it here that looks particularly
[03:26:02.340 --> 03:26:11.540]  salient. It says, as distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures,
[03:26:13.220 --> 03:26:23.300]  the common law, common please law, comprises the body of those principles and rules of action
[03:26:24.260 --> 03:26:28.020]  relating to the government and security of persons and property,
[03:26:28.980 --> 03:26:37.300]  which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity,
[03:26:38.740 --> 03:26:44.180]  or from the judgments and decrees of courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such
[03:26:44.740 --> 03:26:55.380]  usages and customs. Now that, to me, that I think encapsulates it very well,
[03:26:55.380 --> 03:26:57.380]  and it references a whole string of-
[03:27:00.580 --> 03:27:06.420]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid,
[03:27:06.420 --> 03:27:10.660]  the hackers will come, and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[03:27:10.660 --> 03:27:14.340]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[03:27:14.980 --> 03:27:20.580]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again,
[03:27:20.580 --> 03:27:24.980]  and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:27:25.620 --> 03:27:30.980]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[03:27:30.980 --> 03:27:36.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[03:27:36.500 --> 03:27:42.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[03:27:44.500 --> 03:27:49.620]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your home
[03:27:49.620 --> 03:27:54.820]  too with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely
[03:27:54.820 --> 03:28:00.500]  monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. But cybersecurity expert David
[03:28:00.500 --> 03:28:05.540]  Chalk says not so fast. If we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[03:28:05.540 --> 03:28:11.620]  hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[03:28:11.620 --> 03:28:17.220]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health
[03:28:17.220 --> 03:28:22.340]  reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by hackers, there's nothing smart about that.
[03:28:22.900 --> 03:28:27.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:28:30.420 --> 03:28:35.860]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[03:28:35.860 --> 03:28:41.380]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[03:28:41.380 --> 03:28:45.940]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[03:28:45.940 --> 03:28:50.500]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[03:28:50.500 --> 03:28:53.940]  engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father
[03:28:53.940 --> 03:29:00.260]  who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[03:29:02.020 --> 03:29:06.020]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[03:29:06.020 --> 03:29:09.860]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[03:29:09.860 --> 03:29:14.020]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[03:29:14.020 --> 03:29:18.020]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[03:29:18.020 --> 03:29:22.420]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to
[03:29:22.420 --> 03:29:26.820]  learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie
[03:29:26.820 --> 03:29:30.740]  Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[03:29:30.740 --> 03:29:34.740]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule
[03:29:34.740 --> 03:29:39.460]  of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[03:29:39.460 --> 03:29:43.140]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[03:29:43.140 --> 03:29:47.700]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[03:29:47.700 --> 03:29:51.620]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your
[03:29:51.620 --> 03:29:55.540]  rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today,
[03:29:55.540 --> 03:29:58.660]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[03:29:58.660 --> 03:30:06.180]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[03:30:28.660 --> 03:30:43.140]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We're talking
[03:30:43.140 --> 03:30:48.820]  to Eric in Massachusetts, and I've kind of come to the conclusion that we can't figure out what
[03:30:48.820 --> 03:30:57.220]  common law really is. But I'm also to the conclusion that we don't have any kind of definition of a
[03:30:57.220 --> 03:31:05.060]  common law court. So we're how to invoke one or how to convert one that you've been dragged into,
[03:31:05.060 --> 03:31:09.940]  and people say, oh, well, once you've been dragged in there, you just say this and it converts it to
[03:31:09.940 --> 03:31:23.060]  a common law court. I don't see where that can happen. Okay, anything else, Eric? Yeah, I have
[03:31:23.060 --> 03:31:27.380]  a couple of simple questions. Quick, where does common law court ever get mentioned anywhere?
[03:31:27.380 --> 03:31:36.420]  Like where is it? It's not in Article 1 court, Article 3 court, Marine court or whatever that is.
[03:31:37.620 --> 03:31:43.220]  Maritime, yeah. Maritime court. I don't know. Where's the common law court mentioned anywhere?
[03:31:44.340 --> 03:31:50.980]  Good point. Exactly. All right, so my simple question. This is a yes or no question. Can you
[03:31:50.980 --> 03:31:57.700]  still do, if you have a case going on, can you still do a FOIA or whatever it is at the state level
[03:31:58.340 --> 03:32:06.740]  or do you only have to do discovery? No. Once you file a case, you no longer have access
[03:32:06.740 --> 03:32:12.580]  to open records, at least it's that way in Texas. Some open records will be available to you and
[03:32:12.580 --> 03:32:20.100]  others won't. You won't have access to open records that would be records that would be
[03:32:20.100 --> 03:32:26.500]  subject to discovery. Exactly. So most of the things that you would think of that are going
[03:32:26.500 --> 03:32:32.420]  to be exculpatory evidence, that's going to be tied up in your specific case and that's
[03:32:32.420 --> 03:32:37.220]  actually that's available via discovery and so then it's not available via public records request.
[03:32:38.500 --> 03:32:47.300]  However, your buddy, your sister-in-law, your neighbor can make those public records requests
[03:32:47.620 --> 03:32:53.380]  and you can also do those same requests via discovery.
[03:32:54.180 --> 03:32:59.860]  So can I say there's more than one way to skin a cat or would that be insensitive?
[03:33:02.900 --> 03:33:05.460]  It's only an expression. Hopefully you're not actually skinning a cat.
[03:33:06.420 --> 03:33:11.940]  Okay, so I won't. I'll say there's more than one way to skin a dog. Okay.
[03:33:12.900 --> 03:33:19.300]  Next question, simple question. Here's an interesting one. So I filed a lawsuit against
[03:33:19.300 --> 03:33:24.980]  the Board of Health in their personal capacity because they were operating outside of scope,
[03:33:24.980 --> 03:33:32.580]  but the city keeps involving itself, keeps financially defending using their attorneys
[03:33:32.580 --> 03:33:41.380]  to defend this Board of Health and I motioned the court to not allow that and they denied
[03:33:41.380 --> 03:33:46.740]  my motion and that lawyers keep defending, but I was thinking, well, wait a minute,
[03:33:46.740 --> 03:33:53.380]  that's an interesting way to let's say you don't file two months in advance to file a lawsuit
[03:33:53.380 --> 03:34:03.860]  against somebody, a municipality or government or whatever, and if the city is involving itself,
[03:34:04.820 --> 03:34:11.060]  well, then I don't have to give them notice, right? I mean, basically they've involved themselves,
[03:34:11.060 --> 03:34:16.740]  so now they're already kind of an interesting little trick.
[03:34:18.740 --> 03:34:29.140]  So then let's say I went against the board, right? Does the town have to pay me?
[03:34:31.780 --> 03:34:37.540]  Are you talking about adding the board as an entity, a fictional entity of itself as its own
[03:34:37.540 --> 03:34:44.100]  defendant? Well, you know, so I basically sued the Board of Health and I named every individual
[03:34:44.100 --> 03:34:49.460]  and I named them, I said, I'm suing these people in their individual capacity. They operated outside
[03:34:49.460 --> 03:34:56.020]  of scope. Right, because they're criminals. Right. But the town is still defending them,
[03:34:56.020 --> 03:35:06.340]  the town is still utilizing their lawyers and their money and the judge didn't allow,
[03:35:06.340 --> 03:35:14.740]  this allowed me to exclude their lawyers. So that is an issue that you need to take before
[03:35:14.740 --> 03:35:26.100]  another judge. What I would do is disqualify that judge. He's either incompetent or he's insane or
[03:35:26.100 --> 03:35:31.140]  he's intentionally criminal. I don't care which he's not, he can't sit on this case. He needs to
[03:35:31.140 --> 03:35:39.300]  get thumped off. And I want to take this matter of his ruling that the public has to pay for
[03:35:40.740 --> 03:35:46.260]  the judge's buddy to get defense. That can come out of the public coffers.
[03:35:47.700 --> 03:35:54.980]  No. So take that ruling of him throwing your motion to strike pleadings, take that ruling
[03:35:54.980 --> 03:36:02.020]  and make an interlocutory appeal. You petition the appellate court for an interlocutory order
[03:36:02.020 --> 03:36:14.580]  to that effect. Yeah. Okay. But, but so, which I agree with, but does that now put the,
[03:36:14.580 --> 03:36:21.460]  the city on the hook? So let's say I do win the case. Does the town have to pay for that?
[03:36:21.460 --> 03:36:28.980]  Like I don't. No, I don't think so because the town is not properly a defendant.
[03:36:29.780 --> 03:36:35.140]  The town's money is being sucked up inappropriately to pay for these criminals
[03:36:36.260 --> 03:36:42.420]  to have some legal defense. But that doesn't mean that the town is properly named and properly
[03:36:43.300 --> 03:36:51.140]  charged with anything. You don't have a count in your causes of action. You don't have a count
[03:36:51.140 --> 03:36:59.940]  that says that the city as an entity did this. Here's the list of facts that go to essential
[03:36:59.940 --> 03:37:07.460]  elements for some cause of action that the city did. You don't have that. So no, the city is not
[03:37:08.340 --> 03:37:15.140]  on the hook. Okay. But you think I should take it to the appeals court, which is interesting.
[03:37:15.620 --> 03:37:21.540]  So as I'm, as I'm doing this. Yeah. And I would also, not just that, I would make sure that in
[03:37:21.540 --> 03:37:28.340]  the trial court, you file an exception, raise an exception to the judicial error. So that's,
[03:37:28.340 --> 03:37:33.220]  you're preserving it as best you can in the trial court. And you're petitioning the appellate court
[03:37:33.220 --> 03:37:41.620]  to review and reverse it. You could also at the same time, in parallel track, you could be filing
[03:37:41.620 --> 03:37:52.340]  a judicial misconduct complaint because this judge allows some publicly paid attorney to defend
[03:37:53.140 --> 03:38:00.660]  criminals of his choosing. He wouldn't do that if it was you. He wouldn't hire the city attorneys
[03:38:00.660 --> 03:38:04.820]  to be your defenders. Yeah.
[03:38:10.900 --> 03:38:18.820]  So what, what's interesting is just real quick. What's interesting is the town solicitor, the
[03:38:18.820 --> 03:38:27.700]  lawyer explained in part of his motion and his reply motion or opposition motion that the board
[03:38:27.700 --> 03:38:34.420]  of health is actually not a board of health and is operating somehow differently than the state
[03:38:34.420 --> 03:38:48.260]  law allows. Okay. Like based on ordinances. So they, they, they wrote ordinances that allow this,
[03:38:48.260 --> 03:38:55.380]  which, you know, we have a home rule and we have a strong, a very strong sort of home rule. So
[03:38:55.380 --> 03:39:02.500]  all legislature cannot be overwritten by state ordinance. So our home rule, I guess our home rule
[03:39:02.500 --> 03:39:08.580]  is weak. It's not strong. So they can't do that. And I'm like, I can't believe this guy just sent
[03:39:08.580 --> 03:39:14.660]  this to me, which, you know, only supports that these people are operating outside of the code
[03:39:14.660 --> 03:39:18.100]  because they're, they're not even a board of health. So call themselves a board of health,
[03:39:18.100 --> 03:39:23.060]  but they're not a board of health. So I'm glad I asked that question because you brought a whole
[03:39:23.060 --> 03:39:29.140]  new dimension to it that I didn't even think about. So, so if you wish to move on, you can.
[03:39:30.420 --> 03:39:39.860]  Oh, cool. I'm glad that was helpful. You have someone else waiting. Yes, we do. Okay. I'll let
[03:39:39.860 --> 03:39:47.620]  you go on then. Thank you so much. All right. Thanks for calling Eric. Yep. All right. And next up
[03:39:48.580 --> 03:39:53.620]  we've got Steve in Georgia. Good evening, Steve. What's on your mind?
[03:39:55.220 --> 03:40:01.380]  Hey, good evening, guys. Hey, did you guys get a chance to take notice and review
[03:40:02.100 --> 03:40:04.980]  of that case law, Betterman versus Montana?
[03:40:07.300 --> 03:40:07.800]  No.
[03:40:10.180 --> 03:40:10.900]  No.
[03:40:10.900 --> 03:40:12.740]  Did we have a chance to do a what?
[03:40:12.740 --> 03:40:18.340]  A, a citizen. I don't remember seeing your email
[03:40:21.460 --> 03:40:26.500]  or I would have looked at it, but I don't remember seeing anything from here.
[03:40:28.740 --> 03:40:31.300]  That doesn't mean I didn't. They couldn't, we could have missed it.
[03:40:35.380 --> 03:40:39.300]  Yeah, it's nice. It came to you guys two weeks ago over the air.
[03:40:39.300 --> 03:40:42.500]  Is that a reading assignment?
[03:40:45.700 --> 03:40:49.460]  No, it wasn't an email. Okay. What was it? Betterman?
[03:40:51.220 --> 03:40:58.340]  Yeah. Betterman versus Montana. Oh, Betterman. Okay. Yeah. Oh, 578 U.S.
[03:40:59.140 --> 03:41:04.420]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds of
[03:41:04.420 --> 03:41:09.940]  thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be
[03:41:09.940 --> 03:41:16.580]  on or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the
[03:41:16.580 --> 03:41:24.260]  claims cost? The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides
[03:41:24.260 --> 03:41:31.940]  your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero
[03:41:31.940 --> 03:41:38.580]  co-pay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[03:41:38.580 --> 03:41:44.740]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[03:41:44.740 --> 03:41:51.140]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[03:41:51.140 --> 03:41:59.060]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[03:42:02.580 --> 03:42:07.460]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[03:42:07.460 --> 03:42:13.460]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show you
[03:42:13.460 --> 03:42:20.740]  how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[03:42:20.740 --> 03:42:26.020]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our
[03:42:26.020 --> 03:42:31.940]  step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed
[03:42:31.940 --> 03:42:38.580]  attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn
[03:42:38.580 --> 03:42:43.460]  what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[03:42:43.460 --> 03:42:51.140]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[03:42:51.140 --> 03:42:57.940]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[03:42:57.940 --> 03:43:01.780]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[03:43:51.140 --> 03:44:17.540]  Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountains,
[03:44:17.620 --> 03:44:25.940]  and we are talking with Steve in Georgia. All right, Steve, you had just mentioned,
[03:44:25.940 --> 03:44:32.980]  right before we went to the sponsors, you had mentioned a reference to a case, Betterman
[03:44:33.620 --> 03:44:42.820]  versus Montana. I don't know if this is the one you're talking about. I found a 578 US 437
[03:44:43.700 --> 03:44:50.820]  in 2016 that's talking about Speedy Trial. Is that what you had on your mind?
[03:44:52.100 --> 03:44:57.060]  Yes, that's the one I was referring to, United States Constitutional right to a Speedy Trial.
[03:44:58.660 --> 03:45:01.620]  Yes. Well, what's your question about that?
[03:45:03.780 --> 03:45:05.300]  Did you guys ever review it?
[03:45:07.460 --> 03:45:12.500]  Well, no, I haven't until just now. When we went to sponsors, I just kind of skimmed through it
[03:45:13.220 --> 03:45:19.620]  right now. Well, as I bring it to everybody's attention, if they're ever
[03:45:19.620 --> 03:45:24.180]  arrested again, I mean, I think you guys have been arrested, I'm sure a few others,
[03:45:25.620 --> 03:45:31.620]  that in a criminal proceeding, which under Betterman, this Sixth Amendment United States
[03:45:31.620 --> 03:45:38.900]  Constitutional right, it shields the accused upon an arrest or a formal accusation before
[03:45:38.900 --> 03:45:48.580]  a conviction, meaning it's already 30 days. And if you're arrested, that means the moving party,
[03:45:48.580 --> 03:45:53.860]  which would be the cop that arrests you and the prosecutor, on their misdemeanor, they have to
[03:45:53.860 --> 03:46:00.180]  bring you, you have a right to a trial within 30 days and a felony, it would be 70 days
[03:46:00.740 --> 03:46:07.300]  under Betterman. And it's a United States Supreme Court case that protects the accused,
[03:46:07.300 --> 03:46:17.940]  the opinion, it was unanimous, it was written by Ginsburg, and Thomas and Alito agreed. So it was
[03:46:17.940 --> 03:46:27.300]  a unanimous decision that it will trump Barker versus Wingo if a prosecutor tries to use Barker
[03:46:27.300 --> 03:46:34.660]  versus Wingo where the accused has to prove, no, it's already asserted there for you. And once the
[03:46:34.660 --> 03:46:40.100]  cop puts your hands on you and he arrests you without going to the state first, would it be
[03:46:40.100 --> 03:46:47.540]  the prosecutor to ask him about preferring charges? Well, that triggered the arrest,
[03:46:47.540 --> 03:46:52.500]  meaning the clock starts ticking right there. The cop put his hands on you, he arrested you,
[03:46:53.060 --> 03:47:00.420]  put you in jail, wherever picked up off a warrant. Well, they got 30 days to bring you before
[03:47:00.420 --> 03:47:06.020]  an impartial jury trial. And when they don't, they violate it. And under Betterman,
[03:47:06.660 --> 03:47:11.860]  violation of the United States Constitution right to the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Clause
[03:47:12.580 --> 03:47:20.580]  is dismissal of the charges. Everybody should have that written down if they're ever falsely arrested
[03:47:20.580 --> 03:47:27.300]  or one of the authorities put their hands on you and falsely arrest you. You don't let them
[03:47:27.940 --> 03:47:32.420]  take months and months like they normally do before they take...
[03:47:32.420 --> 03:47:38.500]  Yeah, they do normally try that. That's handy. That's good because it specifies days here.
[03:47:38.500 --> 03:47:44.580]  And this is federal, so that's pretty cool. It specifies 30 days between arrest and indictment.
[03:47:45.700 --> 03:47:51.620]  And of course, you know, when they're trying to have, a lot of times they're wanting to go ahead
[03:47:51.620 --> 03:47:55.140]  and skip the indictment and just jump to the part where you say you're guilty of something.
[03:47:56.100 --> 03:48:04.900]  But yeah, once 30 days passes, then that time's up. That's their chance. That's it.
[03:48:06.420 --> 03:48:14.660]  Right. That's just misdemeanors. The felonies is 70 days. And this is only for criminal proceedings,
[03:48:14.660 --> 03:48:20.260]  and you can't be convicted. I mean, you have to be not convicted of it yet for it to apply.
[03:48:21.060 --> 03:48:27.060]  Under Betteman, he pled guilty because he bail jumped and failed to appear.
[03:48:28.100 --> 03:48:35.620]  So it did apply for him, but it will apply for a person that hasn't been convicted but arrested.
[03:48:35.620 --> 03:48:42.020]  So that triggers the start. It starts ticking. That 30 days, if it's a misdemeanor,
[03:48:42.020 --> 03:48:46.980]  they got to bring you before an impartial jury trial. And if they don't,
[03:48:47.940 --> 03:48:53.780]  under that 90th State Supreme Court case, Justice Ginsburg delivered,
[03:48:54.740 --> 03:49:02.580]  and she also goes on with an excellent opinion on this. If I can read some, it says, let's see.
[03:49:07.060 --> 03:49:13.380]  Ultimately found to be innocent, the major evils protected against the speedy trial guarantees
[03:49:13.380 --> 03:49:19.140]  we observe. Arrest is a public act that may seriously interfere with the defendant's liberty,
[03:49:19.140 --> 03:49:25.220]  whether he is free on bail or not, and that may disrupt his employment, drain his financial
[03:49:25.220 --> 03:49:32.420]  resources, curtail his associations, subject him to public ability, and create anxiety in him,
[03:49:32.420 --> 03:49:38.420]  his family, and his friends. We acknowledge in Marion that even a pre-arrest, a stage at
[03:49:38.420 --> 03:49:45.060]  which the right to a speedy trial does not arise, the passage of time may impair memories, cause
[03:49:45.060 --> 03:49:50.580]  evidence to be lost, deprive the defendant of witnesses, and otherwise interfere with his
[03:49:50.580 --> 03:49:58.180]  ability to defend himself. So, nevertheless, this possibility of presence at trial is not
[03:49:58.180 --> 03:50:04.820]  itself sufficient reason to wrench the Sixth Amendment from its proper arrest or charge
[03:50:04.820 --> 03:50:12.420]  triggered. So, she wrote, Justice Ginsburg, I mean, that is a real good case law, and she
[03:50:12.420 --> 03:50:23.380]  detects the accused. Yeah, I think you're right. That is pretty strong. Yeah, so if they ever try
[03:50:23.380 --> 03:50:30.100]  to bring up Boxer versus Wingo, that you got to prove, you don't have to prove nothing on
[03:50:30.100 --> 03:50:35.300]  the betterment. So, I'll register it for you and cite that case law. Oh, wait a minute.
[03:50:36.580 --> 03:50:41.620]  Betterment after Wingo? So, does it distinguish Wingo?
[03:50:43.700 --> 03:50:50.180]  No. I don't see a mention of Wingo. This is 2016, and I don't see a mention of Wingo.
[03:50:51.620 --> 03:50:55.140]  That would still have the effect of distinguishing it.
[03:50:55.140 --> 03:51:02.180]  Oh, yes, it does mention Barker v. Wingo. Good. Okay, where it's going, I must have missed that.
[03:51:04.820 --> 03:51:16.500]  Yeah. Where it says it, let's see, it's, that's at 442 is where it says that.
[03:51:17.060 --> 03:51:26.100]  Yeah, but this is what I'm saying. It trumps Wingo, meaning Wingo under Barker v. Wingo,
[03:51:27.140 --> 03:51:30.740]  it wants the accused to prove how he was dilated.
[03:51:32.420 --> 03:51:43.380]  That was the objection I had to it, that the officials sworn his oath he would do this thing.
[03:51:44.180 --> 03:51:50.660]  He didn't swear on his oath he would do this thing only if I demanded that he do this thing.
[03:51:51.700 --> 03:51:55.380]  Yeah. He swore on his oath as a condition of the contract.
[03:51:55.380 --> 03:52:02.180]  Yeah, that's what he's going to do. Yeah, Barker v. Wingo was in 1972,
[03:52:03.380 --> 03:52:08.100]  and this betterment v. Montana is in 2016.
[03:52:08.100 --> 03:52:15.300]  So that's nice and recent. Yeah, and it mentions Barker v. Wingo,
[03:52:15.300 --> 03:52:17.060]  so they're taking that into account.
[03:52:20.180 --> 03:52:26.580]  And it trumps it. I mean, it trumps Barker v. Wingo. So you don't have to prove it. It's already
[03:52:26.580 --> 03:52:32.020]  there. It's been asserted for you. And you just make sure when they violate you like that,
[03:52:32.100 --> 03:52:38.660]  I mean, the prosecutor in the state gets to put you through a bunch of mental anguish and anxiety.
[03:52:38.660 --> 03:52:43.860]  It takes them six, seven months to get you to trial. Well, that's a deprivation right there.
[03:52:43.860 --> 03:52:50.260]  And that's what Justice Greenberg was saying. So you will win. Even if the crooked courts
[03:52:50.260 --> 03:52:54.100]  convict you, you still would probably win on appeal to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[03:52:54.100 --> 03:53:00.820]  They've already spoken, and it was a humane decision. Yeah, and then here's a reflection
[03:53:00.820 --> 03:53:07.380]  back to common law, like we were talking about earlier. So many things have come up about that
[03:53:07.380 --> 03:53:11.700]  tonight. But it says, our reading, this is in Betterman, our reading comports with the
[03:53:11.700 --> 03:53:18.900]  historical understanding. The Speedy Trial right has its roots at the very foundation of our English
[03:53:18.900 --> 03:53:24.820]  law heritage. Its first articulation in modern jurisprudence appears to have been made in Magna
[03:53:24.820 --> 03:53:31.060]  Carta. And then they cite a couple of cases and say, regarding the framers comprehension of the
[03:53:31.060 --> 03:53:37.460]  right, as it existed at the founding, we've cited Sir Edward Coke's Institute of the Laws of England.
[03:53:39.380 --> 03:53:42.580]  And Coke wrote that the innocent shall not be worn and wasted
[03:53:43.300 --> 03:53:50.900]  by long imprisonment, but speedily come to trial. So that's kind of cool. There's a reference in
[03:53:50.900 --> 03:53:54.820]  there in this Betterman case, a reference to some common law principles.
[03:53:56.980 --> 03:54:02.740]  Yeah, see the state, unfortunately, that's the cops go out there and arrest people. I mean,
[03:54:02.740 --> 03:54:07.220]  if they witness a crime, that's one thing. They witnessed it, they got person firsthand knowledge.
[03:54:07.220 --> 03:54:08.660]  Exactly. That's different.
[03:54:08.660 --> 03:54:12.900]  If they're just abusing people and arrest them because they want to arrest them,
[03:54:12.900 --> 03:54:18.100]  well, if the prosecutor ain't ready because they got about 20,000 cases, well, that's their problem.
[03:54:18.260 --> 03:54:23.380]  Don't let your cops go out there and commit UPL, unpracticed law, because they're not
[03:54:23.380 --> 03:54:30.180]  state licensed attorney. And that's what the cops do. And therefore there's a backlog in the system
[03:54:30.180 --> 03:54:37.060]  where the poor accuser who's innocent or could be innocent, he's got to wait seven, eight months
[03:54:37.620 --> 03:54:42.020]  for the prosecution to get ready. No, that damages that person. I mean, evidence-
[03:54:42.020 --> 03:54:48.420]  Yeah. And make him attend like half a dozen, take off work to go to the courthouse half
[03:54:48.420 --> 03:54:54.100]  a dozen times. Yeah. And God forbid it's something about his driver's license,
[03:54:54.100 --> 03:54:57.780]  because then he can't drive it and he has to take Uber or get somebody else to drive him there.
[03:55:00.100 --> 03:55:03.140]  Do you have to talk about wearing out his resources? That's right.
[03:55:04.660 --> 03:55:10.340]  So thanks to the United States Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg and its unanimous decision,
[03:55:10.980 --> 03:55:14.180]  we got a protection here. So I'm just letting everybody know out here,
[03:55:15.620 --> 03:55:19.460]  when they put their hands on you and call to arrest you, you hold them to betterment versus
[03:55:19.460 --> 03:55:25.140]  Montana. They got 30 days to amnesty and not violate that fifth amendment.
[03:55:25.860 --> 03:55:29.460]  Yeah, very good. I'm glad you called in. You waited a long time to get on,
[03:55:31.060 --> 03:55:34.740]  see you were on the board for a good long while and you were patient. I appreciate you bringing
[03:55:34.740 --> 03:55:39.620]  that up to us tonight. I think that can be helpful to a lot of people. Well, all right,
[03:55:39.620 --> 03:55:44.340]  we are to the end of the evening. It's been a really good one. I'm glad everybody was able
[03:55:44.340 --> 03:55:49.140]  to call in and we'll talk to you again next week. Good night.