ROL_2024-12-06_16k.timecode

Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:02.000]  Bad Boys by Justin Timberlake
[00:30.000 --> 00:32.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:34.000 --> 00:36.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:36.000 --> 00:38.000]  When they come for you?
[00:38.000 --> 00:40.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits
[00:40.000 --> 00:42.000]  You go to school and learn the golden rule
[00:42.000 --> 00:46.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[00:46.000 --> 00:48.000]  If you get hot then you must get cool
[00:48.000 --> 00:50.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:50.000 --> 00:52.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:52.000 --> 00:54.000]  When they come for you?
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:56.000 --> 00:58.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[00:58.000 --> 01:00.000]  When they come for you?
[01:00.000 --> 01:02.000]  You chuck it on this one
[01:02.000 --> 01:06.000]  You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[01:06.000 --> 01:08.000]  You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister
[01:08.000 --> 01:10.000]  You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me
[01:10.000 --> 01:12.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[01:12.000 --> 01:14.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[01:14.000 --> 01:16.000]  When they come for you?
[01:16.000 --> 01:18.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.000]  Whatcha gonna do
[01:20.000 --> 01:22.000]  When they come for you?
[01:22.000 --> 01:24.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[01:24.000 --> 01:26.000]  Whatcha gonna do
[01:26.000 --> 01:35.240]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheeler's Law Radio on this Friday, the sixth
[01:35.240 --> 01:40.120]  day of December, 2024.
[01:40.120 --> 01:41.720]  Did I get that right, Brett?
[01:41.720 --> 01:43.200]  How about that?
[01:43.200 --> 01:47.040]  Well, yeah, I tried to feed you the wrong year the other day and you wouldn't go for
[01:47.040 --> 01:50.840]  it, so I don't know if you want to tell you the year anymore unless you figure out if
[01:50.840 --> 01:52.840]  you can get it.
[01:52.840 --> 01:55.000]  That's why I get the big bucks.
[01:55.000 --> 02:05.200]  Okay, start out with, I'm going to open the phone lines, call in number 512-646-1984,
[02:05.200 --> 02:09.360]  and Brett wanted to talk about subject matter jurisdiction.
[02:09.360 --> 02:17.320]  Yeah, we get calls and texts and everything from people dealing with, they're the defendant
[02:18.320 --> 02:25.760]  situation, some criminal situation where they're being accused of something and they're getting
[02:25.760 --> 02:27.640]  dragged into the quicksands of court.
[02:27.640 --> 02:31.920]  You have to show up, you have to do this and that, and now it's time for arraignment and
[02:31.920 --> 02:39.040]  so forth, and for the most part, there hasn't been any paperwork to commence a case.
[02:39.040 --> 02:46.120]  There's just bluff and bluster, smoke and mirrors, and everybody looking down on you
[02:46.120 --> 02:58.080]  from their elevated high position on the bench and everything all appears to be some kind
[02:58.080 --> 03:04.280]  of a criminal case against you, but there's nothing, and you can verify the nothingness
[03:04.280 --> 03:11.640]  by simply going over to the court clerk who is the custodian, the official keeper of the
[03:11.640 --> 03:13.000]  official record.
[03:13.000 --> 03:19.440]  There is one place that's the source of truth, and the paperwork that has been filed with
[03:19.440 --> 03:27.720]  the court clerk will reflect everything that needs to be in the case.
[03:27.720 --> 03:28.800]  That's the official record.
[03:28.800 --> 03:33.000]  You go to the court clerk and you say, hey, I'd like to inspect the record.
[03:33.800 --> 03:37.840]  You take a look at the record and she'll just pull out some folder and set it on the counter
[03:37.840 --> 03:41.840]  and you can flip through it to your heart's content.
[03:41.840 --> 03:45.000]  And then optionally, you can say, I'd like to get a copy.
[03:45.000 --> 03:51.360]  In fact, I'd like you to certify for me that the copy you're giving me is true, accurate
[03:51.360 --> 03:52.360]  and complete.
[03:52.360 --> 03:58.360]  She's got this little one-liner, she'll staple it to the back and she'll say these four pages
[03:58.840 --> 04:00.880]  are the true, accurate and complete.
[04:00.880 --> 04:05.760]  She'll sign it and maybe stamp it with her court clerk or sign it with a pen.
[04:05.760 --> 04:06.760]  And there you go.
[04:06.760 --> 04:09.800]  Now you have a certified copy.
[04:09.800 --> 04:13.680]  It actually means you could introduce that as evidence into a courtroom if you needed
[04:13.680 --> 04:19.760]  to, that as of this date, there is no case.
[04:19.760 --> 04:30.240]  All they had was let's say a traffic citation or they may have an officer's report of some
[04:30.240 --> 04:32.600]  domestic violence call.
[04:32.600 --> 04:38.640]  He came out on a call and he made this report and that's all there is.
[04:38.640 --> 04:44.920]  And now they're trying to drag you in for an arraignment when actually nobody has accused
[04:44.920 --> 04:47.160]  you of a crime.
[04:47.160 --> 04:56.960]  They're acting like, pretending and saying that you need to enter a plea.
[04:56.960 --> 05:05.160]  But when they want the defendant to enter a plea, that's called a responsive plea.
[05:05.160 --> 05:09.400]  The defendant's pleadings are not what starts a case.
[05:09.400 --> 05:14.440]  The accuser's pleadings are what start a case.
[05:14.480 --> 05:22.640]  So the case can't commence when there's no paperwork filed by the accuser.
[05:22.640 --> 05:29.240]  The defendant, when the defendant enters a plea, there's a possibility for the defendant
[05:29.240 --> 05:37.760]  to skip over any defects in the accusation by saying, oh yeah, I understand what I'm
[05:37.760 --> 05:38.760]  accused of.
[05:38.760 --> 05:40.240]  I get it.
[05:40.240 --> 05:42.760]  You don't need to go through all the hoops of due process.
[05:42.800 --> 05:48.320]  I understand what I've been accused of and I know exactly whether or not I did it and
[05:48.320 --> 05:49.320]  I didn't.
[05:49.320 --> 05:55.960]  Okay, so now you're saying not guilty, but you've skipped the part where you were formally
[05:55.960 --> 05:58.480]  accused of something and a case actually started.
[05:58.480 --> 05:59.800]  You skip all of that.
[05:59.800 --> 06:03.800]  Well, what if you decide not to skip all of that?
[06:03.800 --> 06:06.240]  You want them to do due process.
[06:06.240 --> 06:10.960]  You want them to go through all the steps that the law requires them to do.
[06:10.960 --> 06:18.640]  And when we look in our constitutions and in our criminal procedure, we will find every
[06:18.640 --> 06:23.120]  time, it's different in different states, it's slightly different wording, but every
[06:23.120 --> 06:30.600]  time we find that the presentment of that original accusatory paperwork, primary pleadings
[06:30.600 --> 06:40.200]  from the accuser, that is what commences a case and that is what vests the court with
[06:40.240 --> 06:43.040]  jurisdiction to hear the matter.
[06:43.040 --> 06:49.040]  And we talk about jurisdiction, there are different aspects to jurisdiction.
[06:49.040 --> 06:54.840]  This would be subject matter jurisdiction and the way that works is you look at the
[06:54.840 --> 07:02.160]  subject matter that is on that paperwork, that primary pleadings, whatever gets filed
[07:02.160 --> 07:08.400]  with the court, you look at that subject matter and you say, oh, this is about so and so.
[07:08.400 --> 07:15.840]  And then you have to map that back to what latent jurisdiction has been conferred by
[07:15.840 --> 07:17.880]  statute.
[07:17.880 --> 07:27.480]  So if a municipal court has been given the jurisdiction to handle these low, let's say
[07:27.480 --> 07:32.700]  petty misdemeanors, and you're being accused of one of those petty misdemeanors, you look
[07:32.700 --> 07:36.400]  at the paperwork that was filed and it happens to match.
[07:37.080 --> 07:44.200]  Oh, yep, he's being accused of one of these, say class C or class four.
[07:44.200 --> 07:52.200]  And whatever is on that primary pleading paperwork matches what the legislators have said that
[07:52.200 --> 07:55.000]  particular court can hear, okay?
[07:55.000 --> 08:02.000]  So now that paperwork has activated the latent jurisdiction of that court, the subject matter
[08:02.040 --> 08:09.040]  jurisdiction, which was dormant, which was like a shell or a ghost, it wasn't active
[08:10.200 --> 08:15.920]  until the paperwork went in because there was no subject matter to match.
[08:15.920 --> 08:20.920]  There was nothing to map it to.
[08:20.920 --> 08:27.720]  Yeah, that court handles criminal cases, well, great, where's the criminal case?
[08:27.720 --> 08:31.160]  There's no paperwork filed, see what I mean?
[08:31.160 --> 08:36.480]  So we have subject matter jurisdiction that gets activated by the filing, by the due process,
[08:36.480 --> 08:41.320]  actually, by all of the due process, not just the filing of the paperwork, but the filing
[08:41.320 --> 08:48.320]  of the paperwork is what we use to match the jurisdiction and to vest a court with jurisdiction.
[08:48.320 --> 08:53.320]  As you'll see in different places, we see the language, right, Randy?
[08:53.320 --> 09:00.320]  We see where it says that this court handles this kind of case.
[09:00.520 --> 09:07.520]  Well, the only way to know that that particular court, or it'll say the court of appropriate
[09:08.240 --> 09:14.320]  jurisdiction, how can we know what that is until some paperwork arrives?
[09:14.320 --> 09:21.320]  An authorized individual presents paperwork to that court.
[09:22.720 --> 09:27.480]  Well, who's an authorized individual?
[09:27.480 --> 09:30.760]  Is it the roadside officer?
[09:30.760 --> 09:37.760]  No, he's not allowed, he's got a whole different job.
[09:38.360 --> 09:45.360]  And he's not authorized to represent the state in court.
[09:45.800 --> 09:50.320]  Can he go and sue somebody on behalf of the state?
[09:50.320 --> 09:56.920]  No, that would have to be written down in law for him to be allowed to do that.
[09:56.920 --> 10:01.360]  And I say it that way because I do know one particular state that does that.
[10:01.360 --> 10:06.720]  But for the most part, he plays a totally different role.
[10:06.720 --> 10:13.280]  He supplies a sworn statement, and then the person who is authorized to represent the
[10:13.280 --> 10:19.360]  state in court, which would be generally a district attorney or a county attorney, and
[10:19.360 --> 10:26.200]  that will be written into the law for your particular state, that person will come to
[10:26.240 --> 10:31.240]  court with primary pleadings that are based on his complaint.
[10:31.240 --> 10:34.240]  Let me interject something here.
[10:34.240 --> 10:35.240]  Yes.
[10:35.240 --> 10:42.240]  In, through all of the states that I've looked at, never once have I seen anything in any
[10:42.400 --> 10:51.400]  state law that gave a police officer a special authority to file a criminal complaint.
[10:53.080 --> 10:55.600]  That's true too.
[10:56.400 --> 11:01.240]  A police officer, when he files a criminal complaint with a magistrate, doesn't do so
[11:01.240 --> 11:05.600]  in his capacity as a peace officer.
[11:05.600 --> 11:10.600]  He does so in his capacity as a citizen in a republic.
[11:10.600 --> 11:20.600]  Exact same capacity, F. And the exact same procedure must follow a complaint, whether
[11:20.800 --> 11:23.800]  it's filed by a public official citizen.
[11:23.800 --> 11:26.800]  I'll shut up.
[11:26.800 --> 11:27.800]  Yes.
[11:27.800 --> 11:34.000]  The exception I was referring to was in the prosecution.
[11:34.000 --> 11:40.000]  And I have seen one particular state, I believe it was Pennsylvania, I'm not 100% sure anymore,
[11:40.000 --> 11:41.920]  that was a while back.
[11:41.920 --> 11:46.920]  But there was somewhere that said that the officer, the peace officer, is allowed to
[11:46.920 --> 11:47.920]  be the prosecutor.
[11:47.920 --> 11:48.920]  That's California.
[11:49.240 --> 11:50.240]  I thought that was super weird.
[11:50.240 --> 11:51.240]  It's California.
[11:51.240 --> 11:52.240]  Is it?
[11:52.240 --> 11:59.240]  Yeah, that's the judge and you and the peace officer, he access the prosecutor.
[11:59.240 --> 12:02.240]  That really sucks.
[12:02.240 --> 12:09.240]  So, in that case, he would have to take and draw up an information based on a sworn complaint.
[12:09.240 --> 12:15.240]  I can't see how it could be his own complaint, it'd be judge, jury, and executioner.
[12:15.560 --> 12:22.160]  But yeah, he needs to draw up an information that's based on the sworn complaint.
[12:22.160 --> 12:28.760]  Somebody has to bring to the prosecutor, whoever's going to accuse you of a crime, they need
[12:28.760 --> 12:36.260]  to be presented with a document that has some facts, some assertions of fact, sworn.
[12:36.260 --> 12:42.240]  And then the prosecutor should look at those facts that were alleged under oath and say,
[12:42.240 --> 12:47.920]  oh my goodness, those line up to all the essential elements of this crime over here.
[12:47.920 --> 12:53.480]  So then he goes and draws up an information based on that crime and presents it to the
[12:53.480 --> 12:56.400]  court of appropriate jurisdiction.
[12:56.400 --> 13:03.560]  That is what activates that filing, that presentment is what activates the subject matter jurisdiction
[13:03.560 --> 13:05.820]  of that court.
[13:05.820 --> 13:13.620]  Until that has been filed, the court has zero power to just go looking for trouble and starting
[13:13.620 --> 13:15.820]  up issues that don't even exist yet.
[13:15.820 --> 13:16.820]  Okay, okay.
[13:16.820 --> 13:20.300]  Dragging you into court, trying to get you to a rein and enter a plea and all these things
[13:20.300 --> 13:22.180]  when there's no case.
[13:22.180 --> 13:27.940]  I'm going to stop shutting up now, just for a second.
[13:28.940 --> 13:43.580]  A peace officer, if he arrests someone for any reason or if any time a complaint is filed,
[13:43.580 --> 13:51.980]  it's always directed to some magistrate, not a prosecutor, not a judge, some magistrate,
[13:51.980 --> 13:56.700]  which we will elucidate on the other side.
[14:26.700 --> 14:28.220]  Out of your credit report.
[14:28.220 --> 14:32.860]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[14:32.860 --> 14:37.980]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[14:37.980 --> 14:40.100]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[14:40.100 --> 14:45.620]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[14:45.620 --> 14:48.620]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[14:48.620 --> 14:56.340]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[14:56.340 --> 14:59.380]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[15:26.380 --> 15:29.740]  with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[15:29.740 --> 15:34.140]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[15:34.140 --> 15:38.140]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[15:38.140 --> 15:39.460]  ordering your copy today.
[15:39.460 --> 15:42.980]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law
[15:42.980 --> 15:47.660]  Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents
[15:47.660 --> 15:49.540]  and other useful resource material.
[15:49.540 --> 15:53.500]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[15:53.500 --> 15:57.500]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[16:23.500 --> 16:42.500]  The world is spinning like it's out of control, on the edge of a hole, inside a deep dark
[16:42.500 --> 16:43.500]  bone.
[16:43.500 --> 16:48.500]  I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul.
[16:49.500 --> 16:55.500]  So I sit back and I watch the evidence unfold.
[16:55.500 --> 17:01.500]  And I see justice is the goal.
[17:01.500 --> 17:08.500]  Yeah, justice is the goal.
[17:08.500 --> 17:12.500]  Sometimes we sail a little too far at sea.
[17:12.500 --> 17:15.500]  And then we got to get back on course quickly.
[17:15.500 --> 17:16.500]  Okay.
[17:16.500 --> 17:17.500]  We are back.
[17:17.500 --> 17:19.500]  Randy Kelvin, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[17:19.500 --> 17:24.500]  Brett's finishing up on subject matter jurisdiction.
[17:24.500 --> 17:25.500]  Yeah.
[17:25.500 --> 17:32.500]  We were talking about how you can just go look at the record, go visit the court clerk
[17:32.500 --> 17:37.500]  and look at the record and you can see that no case has started.
[17:37.500 --> 17:40.500]  And I do say visit the clerk.
[17:40.500 --> 17:49.500]  And the reason I encourage people always to go physically to the court clerk, because
[17:49.500 --> 17:58.500]  even though it's possible to send an email or text the clerk or something like that,
[17:58.500 --> 18:02.500]  yes, it's possible to do this with your thumbs.
[18:02.500 --> 18:07.500]  But more than likely what's going to happen is they're going to treat that like a public
[18:07.500 --> 18:08.500]  records request.
[18:08.500 --> 18:12.500]  And then they're going to assume that they have two weeks or 20 days or whatever your
[18:12.500 --> 18:13.500]  state allows them.
[18:13.500 --> 18:15.500]  And they're going to take forever.
[18:15.500 --> 18:17.500]  And then they're not going to give you the records.
[18:17.500 --> 18:19.500]  They're going to give you some pushback.
[18:19.500 --> 18:23.500]  At the 11th hour, they're going to like the afternoon of the last day when they feel like
[18:23.500 --> 18:28.500]  they're about to be officially labeled as a criminal for not answering you, then they
[18:28.500 --> 18:33.500]  send you some little stupid reply about how we think some of these records might need
[18:33.500 --> 18:37.500]  to be redacted or withheld for some reason and we're going to request from the attorney
[18:37.500 --> 18:41.500]  general, blah, blah, or they just ignore you.
[18:41.500 --> 18:48.500]  So then you still don't have your records and you will have given them two, three weeks
[18:48.500 --> 18:57.500]  for back dating, back filling, forging documents that were required by law to exist before.
[18:57.500 --> 19:00.500]  And maybe you're even by that point, two or three weeks later, you're even running into
[19:00.500 --> 19:04.500]  the date where they dragged you into the court, you're supposed to show up now.
[19:04.500 --> 19:08.500]  So I always encourage people to physically go there.
[19:08.500 --> 19:15.500]  First day, day zero, show up, go visit the court clerk and ask to inspect the records.
[19:15.500 --> 19:22.500]  And when you find out from the court clerk what's in there, you now have a snapshot in
[19:22.500 --> 19:23.500]  time.
[19:23.500 --> 19:32.500]  And you know that as of this date and time, no case existed.
[19:32.500 --> 19:36.500]  And like I said, you can have the court clerk certify that for you too.
[19:36.500 --> 19:38.500]  Inspection is free.
[19:38.500 --> 19:42.500]  Certification usually costs a couple of bucks.
[19:42.500 --> 19:51.500]  And now you have something in your hot little hand that shows what the court record contained
[19:51.500 --> 19:52.500]  at that time.
[19:52.500 --> 19:56.500]  Now, later on, they can go and insert some documents in there and start making it try
[19:56.500 --> 19:59.500]  to look like there was a complaint and there was a whatever.
[19:59.500 --> 20:02.500]  They can start sticking things in there.
[20:02.500 --> 20:05.500]  And they're too late.
[20:05.500 --> 20:10.500]  All of that stuff is going to have to go to a future case.
[20:10.500 --> 20:14.500]  You've been dragged in here already for this case that doesn't even exist.
[20:14.500 --> 20:15.500]  So what's that?
[20:15.500 --> 20:19.500]  It's the epitome of frivolous prosecution, malicious prosecution.
[20:19.500 --> 20:24.500]  They're dragging you in for nothingness as shown by their own records.
[20:24.500 --> 20:27.500]  Okay, so one other thing to touch on.
[20:27.500 --> 20:29.500]  I see we've got a couple of callers.
[20:29.500 --> 20:30.500]  We'll go right to you.
[20:30.500 --> 20:37.500]  I did want to just wrap up with one other thing to fill in, connect the dots here.
[20:37.500 --> 20:45.500]  As Randy was talking about a moment ago, there's a step that also has to happen before even
[20:45.500 --> 20:48.500]  any court case can commence.
[20:48.500 --> 20:54.500]  There needs to be a determination of probable cause.
[20:54.500 --> 21:00.500]  This determination is a hearing of its own, and it's not a court hearing, per se.
[21:00.500 --> 21:02.500]  It's a magisterial hearing.
[21:02.500 --> 21:08.500]  It's a hearing for the magistrate to determine whether or not there is probable cause to
[21:08.500 --> 21:11.500]  commence a case, a court case.
[21:11.500 --> 21:15.500]  And this court case may or may not be in the same court.
[21:15.500 --> 21:17.500]  And the magistrates often don't know this.
[21:17.500 --> 21:21.500]  Some of them don't even know that they're wearing a magistrate hat sometimes and a judge
[21:21.500 --> 21:22.500]  hat sometimes.
[21:22.500 --> 21:32.500]  But according to the law, the magistrate determines probable cause and then writes up an order
[21:32.500 --> 21:37.500]  to say whether or not the magistrate found probable cause to exist.
[21:37.500 --> 21:45.500]  And the magistrate seals up all of the evidence that was gathered in that hearing.
[21:45.500 --> 21:50.500]  And if it was verbal, then he makes the people swear to it and it gets written down.
[21:50.500 --> 21:53.500]  And it's all packaged up.
[21:53.500 --> 22:02.500]  In Texas, it's the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 16.17 that specifies how this is.
[22:02.500 --> 22:07.500]  It gets all packaged up and forwarded over by a notice.
[22:07.500 --> 22:13.500]  16.17 says that judge must issue an order.
[22:13.500 --> 22:20.500]  17.30 says that the judge must seal up all documents.
[22:20.500 --> 22:25.500]  Statement of the witnesses, see the charging instrument, the statement of the witnesses,
[22:25.500 --> 22:31.500]  and all other documents had in the case shall be sealed in an envelope.
[22:31.500 --> 22:37.500]  In the name of the magistrate written across the seal of the envelope, then he must forward
[22:37.500 --> 22:40.500]  it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[22:40.500 --> 22:41.500]  Yes.
[22:41.500 --> 22:51.500]  And then that clerk has to give notice to the prosecutor.
[22:51.500 --> 22:55.500]  Or it could be to the district attorney, county attorney, or to the grand jury if they're
[22:55.500 --> 22:59.500]  going to go for an indictment or for an information that goes to the district attorney or county
[22:59.500 --> 23:00.500]  attorney.
[23:00.500 --> 23:06.500]  That clerk has to give it to somebody who is going to be able to draw up the primary
[23:06.500 --> 23:07.500]  pleadings.
[23:07.500 --> 23:14.500]  Now, if you recognize, just pause for a moment and realize that the primary pleadings are
[23:14.500 --> 23:17.500]  an indictment or an information.
[23:17.500 --> 23:25.500]  So, what's happening here is the magistrate has handed to that clerk an envelope.
[23:26.500 --> 23:30.500]  Like Randy said, it's sealed up with all of the everything necessary in there that showed
[23:30.500 --> 23:33.500]  how he arrived at this order of probable cause.
[23:33.500 --> 23:34.500]  Hey, probable cause exists.
[23:34.500 --> 23:38.500]  Y'all need to start a court case.
[23:38.500 --> 23:39.500]  And he hands it off to that clerk.
[23:39.500 --> 23:46.500]  The clerk hands it off to the prosecutor or the grand jury.
[23:46.500 --> 23:54.500]  And then that's where we get the primary pleadings, the indictment or information.
[23:54.500 --> 23:58.500]  Without any of that paperwork in the case, there is no case.
[23:58.500 --> 24:02.500]  You can't have a case that just magically commences itself.
[24:02.500 --> 24:04.500]  That's ludicrous.
[24:04.500 --> 24:13.500]  So, I encourage people to recognize that subject matter jurisdiction is latent when statutorily
[24:13.500 --> 24:21.500]  conferred and not activated until the due process of law is followed and that corresponding
[24:21.500 --> 24:28.500]  paperwork exists in the official record as maintained by the court clerk.
[24:28.500 --> 24:38.500]  The coolest part about subject matter jurisdiction, if the judge doesn't have it, he has no protection
[24:38.500 --> 24:40.500]  under law.
[24:40.500 --> 24:42.500]  Zero. None.
[24:42.500 --> 24:43.500]  Right.
[24:43.500 --> 24:47.500]  To him personally in his individual capacity.
[24:47.500 --> 24:48.500]  So, there you have it.
[24:48.500 --> 24:51.500]  There are my thoughts on subject matter jurisdiction.
[24:51.500 --> 24:55.500]  And personal jurisdiction can't attach until they have all that paperwork and they serve
[24:55.500 --> 24:57.500]  it to you properly.
[24:57.500 --> 25:06.500]  So, one thing that I would note is that judges will often when confronted with these facts,
[25:06.500 --> 25:10.500]  hey, there's no jurisdiction, there's no court case, there's no paperwork, there's no nothing.
[25:10.500 --> 25:12.500]  You don't have a case.
[25:12.500 --> 25:17.500]  They will typically respond with, oh, I'm pretty sure I have jurisdiction or something
[25:17.500 --> 25:19.500]  along those lines.
[25:19.500 --> 25:24.500]  So, it's not to say that this is a silver bullet and everything's going to be fixed.
[25:24.500 --> 25:27.500]  Sometimes I get a dismissal right there.
[25:27.500 --> 25:32.500]  Other times, they just try to blow smoke and you have to challenge it.
[25:32.500 --> 25:35.500]  You have to call them out for that and make it a little farther.
[25:35.500 --> 25:37.500]  You just gave me an idea.
[25:37.500 --> 25:39.500]  Did I?
[25:39.500 --> 25:47.500]  Yeah, the next time I get a ticket, I'll go into court and they'll want to do this plea
[25:47.500 --> 25:48.500]  thing.
[25:48.500 --> 25:51.500]  And I say, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[25:51.500 --> 25:56.500]  Before we can get to that, first, I need an examining trial.
[25:56.500 --> 26:00.500]  And second, I need to see the indictment.
[26:00.500 --> 26:03.500]  Well, yeah, absolutely.
[26:03.500 --> 26:10.500]  It even says, Texas is very clear, that no arraignment may be held until the expiration
[26:10.500 --> 26:18.500]  of two full days after the service of the indictment or information to the defendant.
[26:18.500 --> 26:23.500]  So, that means not only do the primary pleadings have to exist before you can be arraigned,
[26:23.500 --> 26:28.500]  they have to have been properly served to you, plus two days for you to chew on it.
[26:29.500 --> 26:32.500]  Article five, section 17.
[26:32.500 --> 26:34.500]  Oh, section 50.
[26:34.500 --> 26:39.500]  The Texas Constitution acquires an indictment in a misdemeanor.
[26:39.500 --> 26:40.500]  Exactly.
[26:40.500 --> 26:41.500]  That's right.
[26:41.500 --> 26:42.500]  Exactly right.
[26:42.500 --> 26:44.500]  I want to see the indictment.
[26:44.500 --> 26:48.500]  I'm sorry, Alex, Melissa, I see you there.
[26:48.500 --> 26:49.500]  We're going to sponsors.
[26:49.500 --> 26:52.500]  We'll be right back and we will take your calls.
[26:52.500 --> 26:55.500]  On the other side, anybody else wants to come?
[26:55.500 --> 26:58.500]  1-2-646-1984.
[27:01.500 --> 27:05.500]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[27:05.500 --> 27:06.500]  affected our health?
[27:06.500 --> 27:10.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how
[27:10.500 --> 27:13.500]  cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[27:13.500 --> 27:15.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[27:15.500 --> 27:19.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[27:19.500 --> 27:24.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[27:24.500 --> 27:25.500]  So protect your rights.
[27:25.500 --> 27:29.500]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[27:29.500 --> 27:30.500]  Privacy.
[27:30.500 --> 27:32.500]  It's worth hanging on to.
[27:32.500 --> 27:36.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[27:36.500 --> 27:39.500]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[27:39.500 --> 27:42.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[27:43.500 --> 27:45.500]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy.
[27:45.500 --> 27:46.500]  It's a fact.
[27:46.500 --> 27:50.500]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head
[27:50.500 --> 27:51.500]  has been disputed.
[27:51.500 --> 27:55.500]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[27:55.500 --> 28:00.500]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[28:00.500 --> 28:01.500]  affect brain chemistry.
[28:01.500 --> 28:06.500]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[28:06.500 --> 28:10.500]  to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[28:10.500 --> 28:14.500]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[28:14.500 --> 28:15.500]  chances.
[28:15.500 --> 28:19.500]  I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[28:19.500 --> 28:20.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[28:20.500 --> 28:23.500]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[28:49.500 --> 29:04.500]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[29:04.500 --> 29:05.500]  Word?
[29:05.500 --> 29:11.500]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[29:11.500 --> 29:17.500]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[29:17.500 --> 29:21.500]  A study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
[29:21.500 --> 29:23.500]  rightly dividing the word of truth.
[29:23.500 --> 29:28.500]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[29:28.500 --> 29:31.500]  verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[29:31.500 --> 29:36.500]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[29:36.500 --> 29:38.500]  and Christian character development.
[29:38.500 --> 29:43.500]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[29:43.500 --> 29:47.500]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[29:47.500 --> 29:49.500]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[29:49.500 --> 29:56.500]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[29:56.500 --> 29:59.500]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[29:59.500 --> 30:10.500]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[30:13.500 --> 30:16.500]  Yeah, I got a warrant.
[30:16.500 --> 30:19.500]  And I'm gonna solve them.
[30:19.500 --> 30:22.500]  To the head of government them.
[30:22.500 --> 30:24.500]  Prosecute them.
[30:24.500 --> 30:27.500]  Okay.
[30:27.500 --> 30:30.500]  Who's that?
[30:30.500 --> 30:32.500]  Citizens are raised.
[30:32.500 --> 30:35.500]  For distribution.
[30:35.500 --> 30:37.500]  Citizens are raised.
[30:37.500 --> 30:40.500]  For addiction.
[30:40.500 --> 30:43.500]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me.
[30:43.500 --> 30:45.500]  Prosecute them wicked leader, you see.
[30:45.500 --> 30:47.500]  They murder a liar.
[30:47.500 --> 30:48.500]  Them tell me.
[30:48.500 --> 30:49.500]  Them a liar.
[30:49.500 --> 30:50.500]  They tell sweet stories.
[30:50.500 --> 30:51.500]  Me not believe.
[30:51.500 --> 30:52.500]  Me say what them tell me.
[30:52.500 --> 30:55.500]  3% of America vote for Bushy.
[30:55.500 --> 30:57.500]  So how the hell you get the presidency?
[30:57.500 --> 31:00.500]  That's why me have a warrant for you.
[31:00.500 --> 31:02.500]  Everybody listen carefully.
[31:02.500 --> 31:04.500]  Listen to the words of the three shoes.
[31:04.500 --> 31:05.500]  Okay, we are back.
[31:05.500 --> 31:06.500]  We are back.
[31:06.500 --> 31:08.500]  Randy Kelton, Brent Fountain, Real Vlog Radio.
[31:08.500 --> 31:11.500]  And we're going to Alex in California.
[31:11.500 --> 31:14.500]  Alex, doing a lot better today.
[31:14.500 --> 31:20.500]  I'm not exhausted like I was last night.
[31:20.500 --> 31:23.500]  How does your brain feel?
[31:23.500 --> 31:25.500]  Sometimes it gets pretty numb.
[31:25.500 --> 31:29.500]  I generally start out about three or four in the morning.
[31:29.500 --> 31:34.500]  Because at eight o'clock my phone starts lighting up so I can get all my work done early in the morning.
[31:34.500 --> 31:43.500]  This morning I was working on inverse condemnation.
[31:43.500 --> 31:48.500]  Where when they take something from you.
[31:48.500 --> 31:51.500]  And take property from you.
[31:51.500 --> 31:55.500]  And without cause.
[31:55.500 --> 32:00.500]  Like in this case it's a $75,000 airplane they took and it disappeared.
[32:00.500 --> 32:06.500]  And if they take something improperly without cause.
[32:06.500 --> 32:13.500]  They have zero immunity.
[32:13.500 --> 32:18.500]  That's what I'm reading on inverse condemnation.
[32:18.500 --> 32:22.500]  Can you attach the takings clause to this?
[32:22.500 --> 32:25.500]  It is the takings clause.
[32:25.500 --> 32:29.500]  That's what inverse condemnation is.
[32:29.500 --> 32:33.500]  Oh, but the takings clause, they will have a reason though.
[32:33.500 --> 32:36.500]  But you said they don't state a reason.
[32:36.500 --> 32:40.500]  But with the takings clause they usually have a reason.
[32:40.500 --> 32:42.500]  Or they state one at least.
[32:42.500 --> 32:47.500]  Well, in this place they arrested him and they seized his airplane.
[32:47.500 --> 32:55.500]  Well, the problem was the officer went to a justice of the peace and got an arrest warrant.
[32:55.500 --> 32:59.500]  So they went down with ten guys and they arrested him.
[32:59.500 --> 33:01.500]  And then they seized his airplane.
[33:01.500 --> 33:02.500]  Ten guys?
[33:02.500 --> 33:03.500]  Yeah.
[33:03.500 --> 33:04.500]  Really?
[33:04.500 --> 33:05.500]  Yeah.
[33:05.500 --> 33:11.500]  Seized his airplane, seized his computers, seized several thousand dollars.
[33:11.500 --> 33:16.500]  Well, they did not have a warrant to seize.
[33:16.500 --> 33:18.500]  They only had a warrant to arrest.
[33:18.500 --> 33:23.500]  And policemen can't just arrest and seize.
[33:23.500 --> 33:35.500]  In this particular case, the charge they made against him would have had to have been a second degree felony before they could seize any property.
[33:35.500 --> 33:38.500]  But they charged him with a third degree felony.
[33:38.500 --> 33:47.500]  It was thrown out of court because the only charge they could have possibly brought was a Class A misdemeanor.
[33:47.500 --> 33:54.500]  So they arrest him for an alleged second degree, third degree felony.
[33:54.500 --> 33:57.500]  And they seized his $75,000 airplane, which he wasn't using.
[33:57.500 --> 34:03.500]  He was, of course, on the other side of the airport in a fixed base operator's lot.
[34:03.500 --> 34:05.500]  He had a pilot there.
[34:05.500 --> 34:07.500]  He wasn't even flying it.
[34:07.500 --> 34:11.500]  And the officer wouldn't let the pilot fly the airplane back.
[34:11.500 --> 34:16.500]  At the time, he didn't know the airplane belonged to Dr. Joe.
[34:16.500 --> 34:19.500]  He just knew that he came at it.
[34:19.500 --> 34:23.500]  He seized it anyway and had no authorization to seize.
[34:23.500 --> 34:26.500]  That makes it an improper taking.
[34:26.500 --> 34:38.500]  That makes it a, what did I call it, Brett, inverse condemnation.
[34:38.500 --> 34:40.500]  They condemned his property.
[34:40.500 --> 34:50.500]  The codes are really speaking to real property, but the codes do not say real property.
[34:50.500 --> 34:58.500]  Most of the case law on this goes to real property, but the codes just say property.
[34:58.500 --> 35:06.500]  That intentional act, generally, the government acts intentionally when the act complained of
[35:06.500 --> 35:11.500]  is the actual physical taking of property.
[35:11.500 --> 35:16.500]  And see, continued use of an owner's land.
[35:16.500 --> 35:23.500]  When the government's intentional act is not the actual physical taking, damaging, okay.
[35:23.500 --> 35:27.500]  The inverse condemnation is the taking of property.
[35:27.500 --> 35:36.500]  If you have real property and they build a road across it, that's the taking of property.
[35:36.500 --> 35:41.500]  And they have to go through a condemnation process first, and they have to pay you for it.
[35:41.500 --> 35:56.500]  If you have something built on the front of your property, like a post office box and surrounded by brick.
[35:56.500 --> 36:00.500]  I had a friend had that and the state come and pulled it out.
[36:00.500 --> 36:03.500]  That was his and his own his property.
[36:03.500 --> 36:09.500]  Even if you have something that is on a easement.
[36:09.500 --> 36:14.500]  If it's on an easement, then it's still your property.
[36:14.500 --> 36:20.500]  They can't take it while they have authority to use the easement and traverse the easement.
[36:20.500 --> 36:23.500]  They can't take any property from the easement.
[36:23.500 --> 36:26.500]  Anyway, that's that's off topic.
[36:26.500 --> 36:35.500]  What I'm looking for is where they seize property like in an arrest or something.
[36:35.500 --> 36:37.500]  And that's what happened here.
[36:37.500 --> 36:43.500]  And it turned out the court, the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the complaint
[36:43.500 --> 36:50.500]  because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction from the beginning.
[36:50.500 --> 36:55.500]  That means everything is, you know, when I read it, I said, Holy mackerel.
[36:55.500 --> 36:58.500]  They threw these guys under the bus.
[36:58.500 --> 37:01.500]  They threw everybody into the bus.
[37:01.500 --> 37:03.500]  They threw the trial court under the bus.
[37:03.500 --> 37:05.500]  They threw the police under the bus.
[37:05.500 --> 37:09.500]  They threw the appellate court under the bus.
[37:09.500 --> 37:16.500]  Nobody's ever taken on the appellate court for acting without jurisdiction.
[37:16.500 --> 37:24.500]  I intend to sue the appellate court judges because they didn't have jurisdiction.
[37:24.500 --> 37:32.500]  They ruled that they did have jurisdiction and they failed to properly apply the law to the facts,
[37:32.500 --> 37:41.500]  as is referenced by Walker v. Packer, where it says a judge has no discretion
[37:41.500 --> 37:49.500]  in properly applying the law to the facts, a failure to do so is an abuse of discretion.
[37:49.500 --> 37:59.500]  So I will claim that in my suit against all these judges,
[37:59.500 --> 38:04.500]  that the Fifth Circuit failed to properly apply the law to the facts
[38:04.500 --> 38:10.500]  and in the process denied me in my right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[38:10.500 --> 38:22.500]  And I'll accuse them of official oppression and file criminal charges with the federal grand jury,
[38:22.500 --> 38:29.500]  the stats guys, and then I'll sue them personally.
[38:29.500 --> 38:37.500]  So yesterday, Brett said that once they are engaging in a criminal act,
[38:37.500 --> 38:43.500]  they are automatically stripped of their official capacity.
[38:43.500 --> 38:44.500]  And I agree.
[38:44.500 --> 38:46.500]  Yes, here's how it works.
[38:46.500 --> 38:48.500]  Here's how it works.
[38:48.500 --> 38:53.500]  The sovereign can do no wrong.
[38:53.500 --> 39:00.500]  The sovereign can do no wrong and the sovereign cannot authorize anyone else to do wrong.
[39:00.500 --> 39:05.500]  So if someone does wrong under the name of the sovereign,
[39:05.500 --> 39:10.500]  they're not covered by the sovereign immunity,
[39:10.500 --> 39:14.500]  because the sovereign cannot authorize someone to do wrong.
[39:14.500 --> 39:17.500]  I've got the case law in here somewhere.
[39:17.500 --> 39:28.500]  So anytime someone acts outside of scope, criminal acts are not within scope.
[39:28.500 --> 39:34.500]  My favorite case on that, El Paso, sheriff's deputy,
[39:34.500 --> 39:38.500]  picks up this 18-year-old girl at the city jail,
[39:38.500 --> 39:46.500]  takes her to the county jail and decides to have some recreation on the way and stops and rapes her.
[39:46.500 --> 39:57.500]  He claims official immunity when he sued and the judge said rape is not within scope.
[39:57.500 --> 40:03.500]  So any criminal act is not within scope.
[40:03.500 --> 40:11.500]  So here's what I'm pondering.
[40:11.500 --> 40:14.500]  So for police officers, it's even different.
[40:14.500 --> 40:17.500]  They have this qualified immunity.
[40:17.500 --> 40:20.500]  The judges have their judicial immunity.
[40:20.500 --> 40:22.500]  Okay.
[40:22.500 --> 40:23.500]  That depends on the...
[40:23.500 --> 40:30.500]  Okay, the reason I had an objection there is they're claiming that in Texas.
[40:30.500 --> 40:36.500]  I sued all the highest judges in Texas, and they got the attorney general to respond.
[40:36.500 --> 40:40.500]  So I'm dealing with the highest levels,
[40:40.500 --> 40:54.500]  and the attorney general of the state of Texas claimed immunity under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 104.001.
[40:54.500 --> 40:56.500]  That doesn't give immunity.
[40:56.500 --> 40:58.500]  We'll get that on the other side and be right back.
[41:10.500 --> 41:17.500]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[41:17.500 --> 41:25.500]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your employees with doctors,
[41:25.500 --> 41:32.500]  medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay.
[41:32.500 --> 41:38.500]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[41:38.500 --> 41:44.500]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[41:44.500 --> 41:50.500]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[41:50.500 --> 41:59.500]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[41:59.500 --> 42:02.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:02.500 --> 42:06.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[42:06.500 --> 42:14.500]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[42:14.500 --> 42:18.500]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[42:18.500 --> 42:22.500]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[42:22.500 --> 42:27.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[42:27.500 --> 42:33.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[42:33.500 --> 42:42.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[42:42.500 --> 42:51.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[42:51.500 --> 43:00.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[43:03.500 --> 43:08.500]  Thank you for watching.
[43:34.500 --> 43:40.500]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[43:40.500 --> 43:48.500]  And if I seem to get excited about this subject, I think this is where we will begin this war.
[43:48.500 --> 43:57.500]  We stop trying to make the grand gestures. I'm not going to sue for $500 million again.
[43:57.500 --> 44:02.500]  What I'm trying to do is go after this guy on the bottom.
[44:02.500 --> 44:15.500]  When they step outside of scope, then we can argue that they have zero immunity and sue them down here in the bottom court, where it don't cost us much to do it.
[44:15.500 --> 44:21.500]  And right now I'm looking at the small claims court.
[44:21.500 --> 44:32.500]  I sued the guy for $19,000. And the justice of the peace said, how are you going to prove $19,000 in damages?
[44:32.500 --> 44:41.500]  I said, I don't need to. I just need to convince a jury. She took a step backwards on that one.
[44:41.500 --> 44:50.500]  She said, well, Mr. Kelton, are you requesting a jury? No, not yet. I want to see how things shake out first.
[44:50.500 --> 45:01.500]  She is now we've got these guys down here on the bottom doing something they do all the time. And now I'm suing one of them for it.
[45:01.500 --> 45:15.500]  So. Alex. Who do you have to go after? See, let me unmute you. There we go.
[45:16.500 --> 45:24.500]  There we go. Okay, got you unmuted. Okay, who are you going after for acting outside of scope?
[45:24.500 --> 45:33.500]  Well, one CEO, two judges and one commissioner.
[45:33.500 --> 45:44.500]  And so what I think will happen based on all the case law that I have read so far, they I will I have already alleged all my things.
[45:44.500 --> 45:50.500]  They will come back with the judicial immunity. They will come back with that.
[45:50.500 --> 46:07.500]  There's only two exceptions to judicial immunity that is absent of any jurisdiction because in a little bit outside of the jurisdiction doesn't take away judicial immunity.
[46:07.500 --> 46:16.500]  It has to be in clear absence, absence of jurisdiction. And then they don't have judicial immunity.
[46:16.500 --> 46:28.500]  So when I allege, obviously, this act of deprivation of civil rights, which makes it a criminal act under 18 USC 242 is a criminal act.
[46:28.500 --> 46:49.500]  It can not possibly be a judicial act. They will say as long as it's done in the courtroom in the in the relationship of you were the plaintiff and there was a judicial proceeding being done and all these little things that they have created under their unconstitutional doctrine.
[46:50.500 --> 47:11.500]  They will argue this. And I wonder, I could also argue back based on the supremacy clause and that the people have never given them the power to immunize themselves for actions that are clearly in violation of the power that the people gave them and the bill of rights and all the other amendments.
[47:11.500 --> 47:20.500]  Obviously, they have no power to do that. And then they can impassively like immunize themselves because they're the creature and we are the creator.
[47:20.500 --> 47:26.500]  I could do all this, but I think I will fail because they don't want to answer to these things.
[47:27.500 --> 47:40.500]  So I think that if I make my allegation that these were criminal acts, and obviously this is not a judicial act, because normally a judge doesn't do that.
[47:40.500 --> 47:53.500]  They will just come back, try to shove it under the rug and will say, well, here is the well established, well established doctrine that has firmly been implemented.
[47:53.500 --> 48:02.500]  And here is the standard of review, and we have to determine whether this was absent of any jurisdiction. And here, no, it was not blah, blah, blah, blah.
[48:03.500 --> 48:25.500]  What you argue is the rulings in support of this are improper and incorrect, and we will ask the courts to distinguish the case law that extends jurisdiction to acts outside of scope of their official capacity.
[48:25.500 --> 48:37.500]  So you're telling, okay, the way we're going to, the only way we're going to win, of course, you're absolutely corrupt, is obscuring them and getting them to come to the table.
[48:37.500 --> 48:48.500]  So when you sue, you beat up the lawyers, you judicial conduct, complain to judge, just make a nuisance of yourself and get them to come to the table and make a deal.
[48:48.500 --> 49:00.500]  You want to get them to do that, you want to ask a question they're not going to want to risk a negative answer to.
[49:00.500 --> 49:14.500]  In the case here in Texas, a guy was prosecuted for violating city ordinances.
[49:14.500 --> 49:23.500]  So Eddie Craig come up with this argument saying that city ordinances were not laws, they're ordinances.
[49:23.500 --> 49:47.500]  And since they're ordinances, they can't apply to the public in general. They can only apply to employees of the corporation, of the municipal corporation or county corporation, or someone who's in contractual privity, who's agreed to the statutory scheme.
[49:47.500 --> 49:52.500]  We argued that, we filed that in a petition for writ of mandamus.
[49:52.500 --> 50:07.500]  And the courts ruled on the, dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, like we asked them to, but they did it for a different reason.
[50:07.500 --> 50:22.500]  They didn't want to, they didn't want to rule against us on this issue, because if they did, they risked us taking this to the Supreme and risk the Supreme agreeing with us.
[50:22.500 --> 50:33.500]  If the Supreme agreed with us, all city ordinances would go in the trash. They didn't want to risk that bad ruling.
[50:34.500 --> 50:44.500]  So you want to bring up, you always want to look for constitutional issues or issues that will give them major grief.
[50:44.500 --> 50:57.500]  Like this one, you say that you accuse them of violating laws and criminal acts cannot be construed to be within scope.
[50:57.500 --> 51:01.500]  They're not going to want that to get to the Supreme.
[51:01.500 --> 51:14.500]  The thing is, Randy, I have to get there first. I'm not there yet because this, my case is still being over screened because I did this in form of operas.
[51:14.500 --> 51:25.500]  And I have to bear saying that it has to be dismissed because of the judicial immunity.
[51:25.500 --> 51:33.500]  Wait a minute, too many pronouns. Who is they? Is this the court saying it or is it the defendant saying it?
[51:33.500 --> 51:54.500]  No, I'm not even there yet. So I filed my complaint and then because I have to inform a properist, it's going to be screened by a magistrate, which, by the way, I was wondering because I was reading some of Brett's filings in the Telegram group.
[51:54.500 --> 52:06.500]  And I found that in his case, there was also no record of a judge actually assigning a magistrate contrary to the federal rules and suit procedure.
[52:06.500 --> 52:11.500]  And I don't have that either. And I don't actually know if that is a major issue.
[52:11.500 --> 52:19.500]  Well, unfortunately, that is a it's that one is not we're not likely to win that one because they do it all the time and they don't want to change their ways.
[52:19.500 --> 52:28.500]  So they just pretend like there's a standing order that could could automatically refer every single matter to a judge.
[52:28.500 --> 52:32.500]  And they do it on this load balancing rotation basis.
[52:32.500 --> 52:37.500]  And they're not going to stop it. It's against the law, but they won't stop.
[52:37.500 --> 52:44.500]  Harman Taylor took that on and Harman Taylor, he was a lawyer and he gave up being a lawyer in disgust.
[52:44.500 --> 52:51.500]  He is the smartest guy I know. He took him on on that. He had him dead bang.
[52:51.500 --> 52:56.500]  They did not care. It was against him anyway.
[52:56.500 --> 52:58.500]  I had him dead bang too.
[52:59.500 --> 53:06.500]  If Harman can't get it done, he's way out of my league.
[53:06.500 --> 53:20.500]  OK, so anyways, so I have I'm facing I have to object first to their to their just basically putting out this case has to be dismissed for four several reasons.
[53:20.500 --> 53:30.500]  One of them was this in part the young doctrine, which they had brought up, which only allows this injunctive relief for individual capacity.
[53:30.500 --> 53:42.500]  But the with the judicial capacity, they will bring up all their unconstitutional doctrines that have been on the record for like two years, I think.
[53:42.500 --> 53:45.500]  And they will bring all these things up.
[53:45.500 --> 54:03.500]  And it is established by the Supreme Court that judicial immunity is only stripped off if there is an unclear absence of jurisdiction.
[54:03.500 --> 54:11.500]  And they still retain judicial immunity, even if they're in acting in access, access of their jurisdiction.
[54:11.500 --> 54:21.500]  And even when it's alleged to be maliciously or corruptly, there was this case, Sparkman versus Stumpf.
[54:21.500 --> 54:28.500]  I don't know if you guys are familiar with it, but this was a judge and he issued.
[54:28.500 --> 54:40.500]  Order to sterilize a woman who were man or woman who was woman, woman who was incompetent.
[54:40.500 --> 54:49.500]  Yeah, yeah. And then, yeah. And so they granted this guy who permanently damaged this woman immunity.
[54:49.500 --> 54:54.500]  But what he did was not criminal.
[54:54.500 --> 54:58.500]  What he did was bad judgment, but it was not criminal.
[54:58.500 --> 55:05.500]  Where a judge does something that he's strictly forbidden to do that has the effect of violating the law.
[55:05.500 --> 55:10.500]  That's a whole different animal.
[55:10.500 --> 55:16.500]  And it was a stump, something stump.
[55:16.500 --> 55:19.500]  Sparks vs. Stumpman.
[55:19.500 --> 55:24.500]  Stump vs. Stumpman.
[55:24.500 --> 55:30.500]  That does not apply here. The judge had the capacity to make this ruling.
[55:30.500 --> 55:36.500]  He made the ruling beyond the capacity they had.
[55:36.500 --> 55:44.500]  We're talking about charging the judge with violating a statute, violating a law, denying you a right.
[55:44.500 --> 55:49.500]  And I'm arguing that the denial of that right, we'll be right back.
[55:49.500 --> 55:53.500]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[55:53.500 --> 56:00.500]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[56:00.500 --> 56:05.500]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[56:05.500 --> 56:12.500]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[56:12.500 --> 56:17.500]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[56:17.500 --> 56:23.500]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[56:23.500 --> 56:27.500]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[56:27.500 --> 56:33.500]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[56:33.500 --> 56:39.500]  visit Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[56:39.500 --> 56:43.500]  That's 888-551-0102.
[56:43.500 --> 56:48.500]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[56:48.500 --> 56:58.500]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[56:59.500 --> 57:04.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[57:04.500 --> 57:07.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[57:07.500 --> 57:09.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[57:09.500 --> 57:15.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[57:15.500 --> 57:17.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[57:17.500 --> 57:21.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[57:21.500 --> 57:25.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[57:25.500 --> 57:27.500]  So protect your rights.
[57:27.500 --> 57:31.500]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[57:31.500 --> 57:33.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[57:33.500 --> 57:37.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[57:37.500 --> 57:41.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[57:41.500 --> 57:44.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[57:44.500 --> 57:47.500]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[57:47.500 --> 57:50.500]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[57:50.500 --> 57:53.500]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[57:53.500 --> 57:59.500]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[57:59.500 --> 58:02.500]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[58:02.500 --> 58:05.500]  a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[58:05.500 --> 58:07.500]  Third party? Third Amendment? Get it?
[58:07.500 --> 58:11.500]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[58:11.500 --> 58:15.500]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[58:15.500 --> 58:20.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[58:23.500 --> 58:27.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[58:27.500 --> 58:31.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[58:31.500 --> 58:33.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[58:33.500 --> 58:39.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[58:39.500 --> 58:41.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[58:41.500 --> 58:45.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[58:45.500 --> 58:49.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll never get it back again.
[58:50.500 --> 58:55.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[58:55.500 --> 59:00.500]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[59:00.500 --> 59:03.500]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[59:03.500 --> 59:07.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[59:07.500 --> 59:11.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[59:11.500 --> 59:14.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[59:14.500 --> 59:17.500]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars,
[59:17.500 --> 59:20.500]  a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[59:20.500 --> 59:26.500]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[59:26.500 --> 59:29.500]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[59:29.500 --> 59:33.500]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[59:33.500 --> 59:38.500]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[59:38.500 --> 59:42.500]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[59:42.500 --> 59:45.500]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[59:45.500 --> 59:48.500]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[59:48.500 --> 59:51.500]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[59:51.500 --> 59:56.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:00:45.500 --> 01:00:47.500]  I want to pay for the boys with my money.
[01:00:47.500 --> 01:00:51.500]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:00:51.500 --> 01:00:55.500]  The whole agenda smells funny.
[01:00:55.500 --> 01:01:01.500]  I wanna fight in a war of my own.
[01:01:01.500 --> 01:01:08.500]  That one would be less accidental.
[01:01:08.500 --> 01:01:14.500]  I wanna pay for a war of my own.
[01:01:14.500 --> 01:01:24.500]  Okay. Howdy, howdy. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this, the sixth day of December 2024.
[01:01:24.500 --> 01:01:28.500]  And we're talking to Alex in California.
[01:01:28.500 --> 01:01:35.500]  And Deborah let me know that apparently in the Northern District of Texas,
[01:01:35.500 --> 01:01:40.500]  Harmon did win that issue of a magistrate judge,
[01:01:40.500 --> 01:01:46.500]  but only in the Northern District of Texas.
[01:01:46.500 --> 01:01:52.500]  So when I brought it up in the Eastern District of Texas, they didn't want to hear about it.
[01:01:52.500 --> 01:01:57.500]  We just need to get Harmon's paperwork.
[01:01:57.500 --> 01:02:01.500]  Do you know the case citation or the case name?
[01:02:01.500 --> 01:02:05.500]  Oh, but I can find out.
[01:02:05.500 --> 01:02:16.500]  I'll send Harmon an email and ask him for the case that he handled where he objected to the magistrates.
[01:02:16.500 --> 01:02:24.500]  He has a friend of mine, he's helping a friend of mine right now, and they're having that argument at the moment.
[01:02:24.500 --> 01:02:34.500]  And it's held to this guy's case up a year, objecting to a magistrate.
[01:02:34.500 --> 01:02:44.500]  Well, that objecting to a magistrate or objecting to the fact that a judge never actually assigned a magistrate, but a computer system did?
[01:02:44.500 --> 01:02:49.500]  That is not something you will ever beat.
[01:02:49.500 --> 01:03:00.500]  If the judge agrees with the computer system and says whatever the computer system says, I authorize, you're not going to beat that.
[01:03:00.500 --> 01:03:02.500]  Yeah, I'm not even interested in beating it.
[01:03:02.500 --> 01:03:17.500]  I'm just interested in making clear that I'm looking at what they're doing and trying to make sure that they better think before they do some stuff that they're not authorized to do.
[01:03:17.500 --> 01:03:21.500]  That's just kind of I just noticed that on the side and I was just wondering.
[01:03:21.500 --> 01:03:32.500]  OK, then send me an email and ask me for Harmon Taylor's suit on objecting to magistrates.
[01:03:32.500 --> 01:03:37.500]  And I should be able to get you some good case law.
[01:03:37.500 --> 01:03:47.500]  OK, yeah, I'm wondering if you're getting because I did send you an email in regards to your other suit, but then you didn't really.
[01:03:47.500 --> 01:03:52.500]  I don't remember seeing an email from you.
[01:03:52.500 --> 01:03:59.500]  You answered, you answered, but answered to a different question.
[01:03:59.500 --> 01:04:01.500]  You should have tuned me out.
[01:04:01.500 --> 01:04:06.500]  OK, let me see. What's the first thing you did?
[01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:09.500]  You should chew him out again. I want to hear.
[01:04:09.500 --> 01:04:13.500]  Yeah, I'm married. I'm used to it.
[01:04:13.500 --> 01:04:18.500]  I'm used to women abusing me.
[01:04:18.500 --> 01:04:21.500]  And you're still there.
[01:04:21.500 --> 01:04:24.500]  Poor guys were so mistreated.
[01:04:24.500 --> 01:04:29.500]  OK, what's the first three letters of your email?
[01:04:29.500 --> 01:04:36.500]  Ale, like Alex.
[01:04:36.500 --> 01:04:40.500]  Alex or Alex, Ale.
[01:04:40.500 --> 01:04:43.500]  Ale as an apple.
[01:04:43.500 --> 01:04:51.500]  OK, I don't see anything under Alex.
[01:04:51.500 --> 01:04:55.500]  I will tell you in a second.
[01:04:55.500 --> 01:04:57.500]  Allison?
[01:04:57.500 --> 01:04:59.500]  No.
[01:04:59.500 --> 01:05:01.500]  Alpha Lima Echo.
[01:05:01.500 --> 01:05:03.500]  November 26th.
[01:05:03.500 --> 01:05:06.500]  Yeah, I get nothing.
[01:05:06.500 --> 01:05:09.500]  You answered on November 28th.
[01:05:09.500 --> 01:05:18.500]  November 28th. OK, I can work with.
[01:05:18.500 --> 01:05:20.500]  OK, anyway, go ahead.
[01:05:20.500 --> 01:05:27.500]  Yeah, so while, yeah, so basically what that means with the criminal,
[01:05:27.500 --> 01:05:35.500]  because there's another thing that they like to keep bringing up is that a plaintiff cannot allege
[01:05:35.500 --> 01:05:44.500]  or cannot proceed with the 1983 aim by alleging criminal statute.
[01:05:44.500 --> 01:05:49.500]  But they're they're misrepresenting that because from what I understand,
[01:05:49.500 --> 01:05:57.500]  what you're saying is I will have to make clear that I'm not trying to get remedy by alleging those statutes,
[01:05:57.500 --> 01:06:03.500]  but I'm bringing up those statutes to make clear that they are part of the civil rights deprivation
[01:06:03.500 --> 01:06:07.500]  and the civil rights deprivation.
[01:06:07.500 --> 01:06:16.500]  Yeah, just to show that it's reasonably, it's not reasonably that it's objectively unreasonable.
[01:06:16.500 --> 01:06:19.500]  They can't claim that it's that their actions were reasonable.
[01:06:19.500 --> 01:06:28.500]  In fact, they're specifically codified as criminal, so you're not invoking their duty in that claim.
[01:06:28.500 --> 01:06:33.500]  You're just pointing out how unreasonable their actions were and out of scope.
[01:06:33.500 --> 01:06:41.500]  You're making your claim by alleging that criminal acts on the part of public officials are outside of scope.
[01:06:41.500 --> 01:06:49.500]  And they deny you in procedural due process. Procedural due process is the claim that you have.
[01:06:49.500 --> 01:06:52.500]  It results from public officials acting outside of scope.
[01:06:52.500 --> 01:06:56.500]  You guys make whatever arguments they want to.
[01:06:56.500 --> 01:07:02.500]  They will do everything they can to misconstrue everything you say.
[01:07:02.500 --> 01:07:08.500]  It's their job. Yeah, it's comical.
[01:07:08.500 --> 01:07:14.500]  Okay. You write your suit, expect them to do that.
[01:07:14.500 --> 01:07:17.500]  So write it with that in mind.
[01:07:17.500 --> 01:07:27.500]  Yeah. Is there any case that you guys are aware of that alleged specifically that
[01:07:27.500 --> 01:07:35.500]  brought up criminal statutes describe the essential elements and put it under the scope of deprivation of rights
[01:07:35.500 --> 01:07:42.500]  and making clear that this is why they lost their immunity because they have engaged in criminal conduct?
[01:07:42.500 --> 01:07:47.500]  That's what is it?
[01:07:47.500 --> 01:07:51.500]  Yeah, I put that in my suit. You're looking at my pleadings. You'll find that in there.
[01:07:51.500 --> 01:07:57.500]  The primary one with I want to say Brady.
[01:07:57.500 --> 01:08:07.500]  The one where the five federal agents were sued in their personal capacity for acting outside of scope of authority.
[01:08:07.500 --> 01:08:15.500]  I think it's Brady.
[01:08:15.500 --> 01:08:18.500]  I'm not remembering things too good here lately.
[01:08:18.500 --> 01:08:23.500]  That one. Everybody knows that one, if I could think of the name of it.
[01:08:23.500 --> 01:08:25.500]  Brett.
[01:08:25.500 --> 01:08:27.500]  Brady Maryland comes to mind.
[01:08:27.500 --> 01:08:31.500]  That's what I think it is.
[01:08:31.500 --> 01:08:35.500]  It's five.
[01:08:35.500 --> 01:08:40.500]  Five federal agents.
[01:08:40.500 --> 01:08:42.500]  I have to look it up.
[01:08:42.500 --> 01:08:44.500]  Okay.
[01:08:44.500 --> 01:08:48.500]  Not coming to mind.
[01:08:48.500 --> 01:09:09.500]  And do you put this argumentation in your 22, 23, 2022, 2023 files against what county and Thomas, the Thomas guy in there?
[01:09:09.500 --> 01:09:12.500]  Yes. Yes, Cliff Thomas.
[01:09:12.500 --> 01:09:15.500]  Yeah, it's in the it's towards the end.
[01:09:15.500 --> 01:09:28.500]  That's the last thing that you'll find in there before the conclusion as a reference to the title 18 US Code 242 and 241.
[01:09:28.500 --> 01:09:47.500]  But I couched it very clearly as not trying to use this as a basis for anything other than to just show that the actions were objectively unreasonable and to show that, you know, here I'm claiming that they did criminal acts.
[01:09:47.500 --> 01:09:49.500]  Well, here's that.
[01:09:49.500 --> 01:09:51.500]  Here's what they found it.
[01:09:51.500 --> 01:09:52.500]  Found it.
[01:09:52.500 --> 01:09:55.500]  Bivens.
[01:09:55.500 --> 01:09:56.500]  Oh, you're talking about a Bivens suit.
[01:09:56.500 --> 01:09:57.500]  Yeah.
[01:09:57.500 --> 01:10:05.500]  I've got one of those too, but I haven't posted it up there on our channel.
[01:10:05.500 --> 01:10:06.500]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:10:06.500 --> 01:10:09.500]  I'll shut up now.
[01:10:09.500 --> 01:10:12.500]  In a Bivens suit.
[01:10:12.500 --> 01:10:18.500]  So this is almost identical to the 1983 suits.
[01:10:18.500 --> 01:10:30.500]  The difference is when you're when you're writing up a 1983 suit, it is specifically about state actors.
[01:10:30.500 --> 01:10:45.500]  And Bivens is a creation of the court, a doctrine that was set up to say, look, we recognize that the same remedy needs to allow for federal actors to be held accountable.
[01:10:45.500 --> 01:10:57.500]  So Bivens sets the bar for that to be the same as we have in Title 42, Section 1983, holding state actors accountable.
[01:10:57.500 --> 01:11:05.500]  We can now reference Bivens and say we're holding federal actors accountable.
[01:11:05.500 --> 01:11:06.500]  Yeah.
[01:11:06.500 --> 01:11:25.500]  Okay, your complaint about 18 U.S. Code 242, and they're objecting to it saying you can't sue for violations 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:11:25.500 --> 01:11:34.500]  Nonsense. 18 U.S. Code 242 is the first half of the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:11:34.500 --> 01:11:40.500]  42 U.S. Code 1983 is the second half of the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:11:40.500 --> 01:11:46.500]  The first half makes it criminal for them to violate your rights.
[01:11:46.500 --> 01:11:52.500]  The second half gives you a cause of action when they do violate your rights.
[01:11:52.500 --> 01:11:57.500]  That's exactly what 42 U.S. Code 1983 was for.
[01:11:57.500 --> 01:12:00.500]  That's the whole point.
[01:12:00.500 --> 01:12:16.500]  The thing is also, if you read the language of 42 U.S. Code 1983, it clearly allows judges to be sued in the same scope as all other actors,
[01:12:16.500 --> 01:12:31.500]  because it only makes one limitation on the injunctive relief that needs to be preceded by some declaratory relief being violated or not available.
[01:12:31.500 --> 01:12:41.500]  But it's not forbidding the judges to be sued just as the other persons that they include.
[01:12:41.500 --> 01:12:43.500]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:12:43.500 --> 01:12:49.500]  Go ahead and read it and let me know your opinion.
[01:12:49.500 --> 01:12:58.500]  You know how we say that you can never expect to win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:12:58.500 --> 01:13:03.500]  You win your case if you have the politics on your side.
[01:13:03.500 --> 01:13:09.500]  Take a step back and look at the politics. Are you suing in California?
[01:13:09.500 --> 01:13:11.500]  Yeah, California.
[01:13:11.500 --> 01:13:15.500]  Okay, think about it.
[01:13:15.500 --> 01:13:20.500]  Look who we've got as a president and look what he's threatening to do.
[01:13:20.500 --> 01:13:28.500]  He has got everybody in government shaking in their boots like nothing I've ever seen in my lifetime.
[01:13:28.500 --> 01:13:34.500]  I really liked Ronald Reagan.
[01:13:34.500 --> 01:13:41.500]  He did this, but what he did was nothing compared to what Trump's doing.
[01:13:41.500 --> 01:13:43.500]  Everybody's shaking in their boots.
[01:13:43.500 --> 01:13:47.500]  The politics has dramatically changed.
[01:13:47.500 --> 01:13:52.500]  And when we come back on the other side, I'll talk about some politics.
[01:13:52.500 --> 01:13:58.500]  We can create some now. Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:13:58.500 --> 01:14:03.500]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:14:03.500 --> 01:14:07.500]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:14:07.500 --> 01:14:13.500]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:14:13.500 --> 01:14:19.500]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:14:19.500 --> 01:14:25.500]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:14:25.500 --> 01:14:32.500]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:14:32.500 --> 01:14:37.500]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:14:37.500 --> 01:14:39.500]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:14:39.500 --> 01:14:48.500]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:14:48.500 --> 01:14:58.500]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:14:58.500 --> 01:15:03.500]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:15:03.500 --> 01:15:07.500]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed.
[01:15:07.500 --> 01:15:12.500]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:15:12.500 --> 01:15:17.500]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give
[01:15:17.500 --> 01:15:20.500]  because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:15:20.500 --> 01:15:25.500]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:15:25.500 --> 01:15:30.500]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:15:30.500 --> 01:15:36.500]  Now, go to logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:15:36.500 --> 01:15:42.500]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:15:42.500 --> 01:15:43.500]  Do I pay extra?
[01:15:43.500 --> 01:15:44.500]  No.
[01:15:44.500 --> 01:15:46.500]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:15:46.500 --> 01:15:47.500]  No.
[01:15:47.500 --> 01:15:48.500]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:15:48.500 --> 01:15:49.500]  No. I mean, yes.
[01:15:49.500 --> 01:15:55.500]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:15:55.500 --> 01:15:57.500]  You're welcome.
[01:15:57.500 --> 01:15:59.500]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:16:16.500 --> 01:16:40.500]  Okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rue La La Radio. We're talking to Alex in California.
[01:16:40.500 --> 01:16:49.500]  And Alex, we are at a period of time in politics like no other in my lifetime.
[01:16:49.500 --> 01:16:56.500]  That's a long time.
[01:16:56.500 --> 01:16:59.500]  I like Ronald Reagan.
[01:16:59.500 --> 01:17:05.500]  When Ronald Reagan was in, the air traffic controllers, they were going to go on strike.
[01:17:05.500 --> 01:17:11.500]  And he told them that it's a national security matter. If you go on strike, I'll fire every one of you.
[01:17:11.500 --> 01:17:18.500]  They went on strike. He fired every one of them. He got everybody's attention.
[01:17:18.500 --> 01:17:29.500]  Ronald Reagan brought down the Soviet Union with a defense system that we did not have.
[01:17:29.500 --> 01:17:38.500]  You remember Star Wars? He told the Russians, if you screw with me, I'll create Star Wars.
[01:17:38.500 --> 01:17:46.500]  I'll put laser satellites up that can take your missiles out of the air before they leave the silos.
[01:17:46.500 --> 01:17:52.500]  And the Russians went to their scientists and said, can they do this? Yes, we can.
[01:17:52.500 --> 01:17:58.500]  Can we defend against it? Yeah, we can, but it'll bankrupt us.
[01:17:58.500 --> 01:18:08.500]  He brought down the Soviet Union with a defense system we did not have that we could have created.
[01:18:08.500 --> 01:18:17.500]  And he told them he would. He's like Trump, except Trump is Reagan on steroids.
[01:18:17.500 --> 01:18:26.500]  Never have I ever seen anybody come into the government like Trump has.
[01:18:26.500 --> 01:18:32.500]  He's got everybody terrified. Every U.S. attorney has to tender his resignation.
[01:18:32.500 --> 01:18:43.500]  And every Democratic district judge in the country is pretty certain that Trump's gunning for them.
[01:18:43.500 --> 01:18:51.500]  So the first thing we want to do is take them to the U.S. attorney in D.C.
[01:18:51.500 --> 01:18:58.500]  I can show you how to do that. You file a criminal complaint against the judge with the local, with the U.S.
[01:18:58.500 --> 01:19:05.500]  You file it with the federal grand jury at the address of the U.S. attorney's office.
[01:19:05.500 --> 01:19:09.500]  That's the only address we have for a federal grand jury.
[01:19:09.500 --> 01:19:18.500]  But you send it to the foreman of the grand jury to the U.S. attorney's address, registered restricted.
[01:19:18.500 --> 01:19:21.500]  So that only the foreman can sign for it.
[01:19:21.500 --> 01:19:27.500]  Well, it'll go to the mail room and the guy in the mail room will sign for it.
[01:19:27.500 --> 01:19:33.500]  Or they'll take it up to the U.S. attorney and somebody up there will sign for it and claim they're authorized to do it.
[01:19:33.500 --> 01:19:39.500]  They'll get it. The U.S. attorney will get it and inside he'll find a cover letter.
[01:19:39.500 --> 01:19:46.500]  You put this cover letter in there telling the foreman that we have trouble, excuse me,
[01:19:46.500 --> 01:19:53.500]  with U.S. attorneys secreting criminal complaints against public officials from the grand jury.
[01:19:53.500 --> 01:20:02.500]  So to be sure that you actually got this, you initial this document and return it to me in the included stamp self-addressed envelope.
[01:20:02.500 --> 01:20:14.500]  Do not sign it as the U.S. attorney has a rubber stamp with your name on it that he uses to rubber stamp superseding indictments.
[01:20:14.500 --> 01:20:19.500]  So we want to make sure that the U.S. attorney doesn't rubber stamp this.
[01:20:19.500 --> 01:20:27.500]  Well, the U.S. attorney is going to get that and there is absolutely no chance the foreman is going to see that letter.
[01:20:28.500 --> 01:20:35.500]  So when you don't get that letter back within, say, 10 days, now you have reason to believe,
[01:20:35.500 --> 01:20:42.500]  and you do believe, that the U.S. attorney interfered with the U.S. mail.
[01:20:42.500 --> 01:20:47.500]  Excuse me.
[01:20:47.500 --> 01:20:57.500]  And now you file the next complaint with the grand jury, you make it against the U.S. attorney.
[01:20:57.500 --> 01:21:08.500]  And when you don't get the cover letter back on that one, then you file criminally against the U.S. attorney with the attorney general in D.C.
[01:21:09.500 --> 01:21:22.500]  Now, the U.S. attorney is going to be shaking in his boots because he knows that Trump, unlike George Bush,
[01:21:22.500 --> 01:21:32.500]  George W. got rid of, replaced a whole bunch of U.S. attorneys and it caused a big stink. Everybody was upset about it.
[01:21:33.500 --> 01:21:40.500]  They know Trump is going to get rid of a lot of U.S. attorneys.
[01:21:40.500 --> 01:21:52.500]  So the last thing the U.S. attorney is going to want is for his name to be in a set of complaints going to the U.S. attorney general.
[01:21:52.500 --> 01:22:06.500]  So now the U.S. attorney general has plausible deniability for getting rid of this, replacing this Democratic U.S. attorney with a Republican.
[01:22:09.500 --> 01:22:12.500]  Politics is in our favor.
[01:22:12.500 --> 01:22:15.500]  The timing is perfect.
[01:22:15.500 --> 01:22:20.500]  Is he going to appoint any new federal judges?
[01:22:20.500 --> 01:22:27.500]  Oh, you know he's going to appoint as many federal judges as he can. He did that last time.
[01:22:27.500 --> 01:22:34.500]  The Democrats did everything they could to hold him up, hold up the appointments.
[01:22:34.500 --> 01:22:38.500]  They won't be able to this time.
[01:22:38.500 --> 01:22:43.500]  According to Tom Kiley, I produced his show last night.
[01:22:43.500 --> 01:22:49.500]  He said that Trump now has a 65 percent repriever ready.
[01:22:49.500 --> 01:22:54.500]  He has a higher approval rating than when he got elected.
[01:22:54.500 --> 01:22:57.500]  Well, I think Kamala was helping with that.
[01:22:57.500 --> 01:23:05.500]  Yeah, she was. But now that he's got elected, it's even improved.
[01:23:05.500 --> 01:23:13.500]  With what he's saying he's going to do, the public is more behind him than they were.
[01:23:13.500 --> 01:23:17.500]  So now is the best time.
[01:23:17.500 --> 01:23:23.500]  He's going to want to replace Democratic U.S. attorneys, and all he needs is an excuse.
[01:23:23.500 --> 01:23:27.500]  So give him one.
[01:23:27.500 --> 01:23:35.500]  And he's likely to want to get rid of some Democratic federal judges.
[01:23:35.500 --> 01:23:40.500]  Give him a reason to do that.
[01:23:40.500 --> 01:23:47.500]  Criminal complaints against the judge with the U.S. Attorney General in D.C.
[01:23:47.500 --> 01:23:52.500]  And they're going to say, well, you should send this here. It shouldn't come here first.
[01:23:52.500 --> 01:23:58.500]  You don't care. You want them to get it and read it.
[01:23:58.500 --> 01:24:03.500]  What if they just toss it off the desk and do nothing?
[01:24:03.500 --> 01:24:09.500]  Look, look, if it rains tomorrow, you're going to get wet.
[01:24:09.500 --> 01:24:12.500]  It happens.
[01:24:12.500 --> 01:24:22.500]  But if you don't do anything because somebody might make it difficult, it never happens.
[01:24:22.500 --> 01:24:27.500]  That's true, Randy. But I'm fighting like on three different fronts.
[01:24:27.500 --> 01:24:32.500]  And so I'm like, where can I make the biggest difference?
[01:24:32.500 --> 01:24:35.500]  Well, here's what's likely to happen.
[01:24:35.500 --> 01:24:41.500]  You make that you make a federal criminal claim.
[01:24:41.500 --> 01:24:47.500]  The federal district judge is not likely to even pay attention to you at all.
[01:24:47.500 --> 01:24:54.500]  They won't even be available for you to make for you to swear out the complaint in front of them,
[01:24:54.500 --> 01:24:58.500]  which is what you're expected to do according to federal rules of criminal procedure.
[01:24:58.500 --> 01:25:02.500]  Rule three, you're supposed to go and do that in front of them.
[01:25:02.500 --> 01:25:06.500]  But it also says read three, four and four point one.
[01:25:06.500 --> 01:25:13.500]  It also says that if the federal district judge is not available, the magistrate judge, sorry, is not available,
[01:25:13.500 --> 01:25:21.500]  then you can take your federal criminal complaint to any state or local judicial officer.
[01:25:21.500 --> 01:25:28.500]  So that opens it up for you just to go down to the street and meet your friendly neighborhood J.P.
[01:25:28.500 --> 01:25:35.500]  And they're typically more willing to just go ahead and, oh, Mr.
[01:25:35.500 --> 01:25:37.500]  federal judge is too big for his britches, huh?
[01:25:37.500 --> 01:25:40.500]  OK, yeah, well, I'll sign it.
[01:25:40.500 --> 01:25:46.500]  What did you what kind of Wheaties did you eat this morning?
[01:25:46.500 --> 01:25:52.500]  A local J.P. taking a complaint against a federal official.
[01:25:52.500 --> 01:25:56.500]  Good luck with that.
[01:25:56.500 --> 01:25:58.500]  So we need that.
[01:25:58.500 --> 01:26:04.500]  What I did when I had a federal judge in Fort Worth give me a bogus ruling,
[01:26:04.500 --> 01:26:11.500]  he dismissed my case with prejudice for failure to state a claim when I filed a petition to declaratory judgment.
[01:26:11.500 --> 01:26:16.500]  Petitions for declaratory judgments don't have claims.
[01:26:16.500 --> 01:26:23.500]  So I sent a criminal complaint to the special agent in charge of the local FBI.
[01:26:23.500 --> 01:26:28.500]  Three more people filed my exact same suit.
[01:26:28.500 --> 01:26:32.500]  And this judge didn't dismiss one of them.
[01:26:32.500 --> 01:26:34.500]  What's going to happen?
[01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:35.500]  You file a criminal complaint.
[01:26:35.500 --> 01:26:41.500]  I'm about to do this in Utah with the FBI.
[01:26:41.500 --> 01:26:43.500]  First thing they're going to do is call the judge.
[01:26:43.500 --> 01:26:46.500]  We'll know what's going on.
[01:26:46.500 --> 01:26:55.500]  Then the judge finds out you're going after him criminally, especially now with Trump in there.
[01:26:55.500 --> 01:27:00.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:27:00.500 --> 01:27:04.500]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:27:04.500 --> 01:27:09.500]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:27:09.500 --> 01:27:15.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:27:15.500 --> 01:27:17.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:27:17.500 --> 01:27:20.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:27:20.500 --> 01:27:25.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:27:25.500 --> 01:27:30.500]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:27:30.500 --> 01:27:33.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:27:33.500 --> 01:27:37.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:27:37.500 --> 01:27:41.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:27:41.500 --> 01:27:44.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:27:44.500 --> 01:27:48.500]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:27:48.500 --> 01:27:49.500]  Wrong.
[01:27:49.500 --> 01:27:54.500]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:27:54.500 --> 01:28:01.500]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:28:01.500 --> 01:28:04.500]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite,
[01:28:04.500 --> 01:28:08.500]  but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:28:08.500 --> 01:28:11.500]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings,
[01:28:11.500 --> 01:28:14.500]  which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:28:14.500 --> 01:28:17.500]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:28:17.500 --> 01:28:22.500]  and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:28:22.500 --> 01:28:28.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:28:29.500 --> 01:28:34.500]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:28:34.500 --> 01:28:36.500]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:28:36.500 --> 01:28:41.500]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:28:41.500 --> 01:28:44.500]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:28:44.500 --> 01:28:47.500]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:28:47.500 --> 01:28:48.500]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:28:48.500 --> 01:28:49.500]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:28:49.500 --> 01:28:51.500]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:28:51.500 --> 01:28:52.500]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:28:52.500 --> 01:28:53.500]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:28:53.500 --> 01:28:56.500]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:28:56.500 --> 01:28:59.500]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:29:56.500 --> 01:29:58.500]  We all want and deserve.
[01:30:01.500 --> 01:30:04.500]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:30:04.500 --> 01:30:07.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:26.500 --> 01:30:30.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:30.500 --> 01:30:34.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:34.500 --> 01:30:38.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:38.500 --> 01:30:43.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:43.500 --> 01:30:48.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:48.500 --> 01:30:53.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:53.500 --> 01:30:58.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:58.500 --> 01:31:03.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:03.500 --> 01:31:08.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:08.500 --> 01:31:13.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:14.500 --> 01:31:19.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:19.500 --> 01:31:24.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:32.500 --> 01:31:37.500]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:31:37.500 --> 01:31:50.460]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelvin, Brett Fowler, and Alex, rethink your case and consider the
[01:31:50.460 --> 01:31:53.500]  politics as it exists today.
[01:31:53.500 --> 01:32:02.620]  You have an avenue through the special agent in charge of the FBI, the US attorney, and
[01:32:02.620 --> 01:32:03.620]  the grand jury.
[01:32:04.620 --> 01:32:12.420]  I went to the special agent in charge first, but the first time I did it, but when I do
[01:32:12.420 --> 01:32:19.100]  it now, I'm going to go straight to the grand jury and get the US attorney to block it from
[01:32:19.100 --> 01:32:20.100]  the grand jury.
[01:32:20.100 --> 01:32:26.620]  Then I get to file against the US attorney and go straight to DC and just make as much
[01:32:26.620 --> 01:32:28.900]  noise as you can.
[01:32:28.900 --> 01:32:33.580]  Now you put the judge on notice.
[01:32:34.100 --> 01:32:40.940]  When you say consider, like you mean this parallel to the civil lawsuit at the same
[01:32:40.940 --> 01:32:41.940]  time?
[01:32:41.940 --> 01:32:42.940]  Yes.
[01:32:42.940 --> 01:32:43.940]  Okay.
[01:32:43.940 --> 01:32:44.940]  Yeah.
[01:32:44.940 --> 01:32:53.100]  If you're concerned about getting the judge upset at you, big deal.
[01:32:53.100 --> 01:32:59.620]  You can expect him to rule against you out of hand at every turn, no matter what, to
[01:32:59.620 --> 01:33:01.220]  consider anything else as naive.
[01:33:01.860 --> 01:33:04.820]  You're a process, a hate process.
[01:33:04.820 --> 01:33:09.020]  So if the judge is angry at you or not, who cares?
[01:33:09.020 --> 01:33:15.900]  I'd rather him be afraid of me than angry at me, or be angry and afraid than rather
[01:33:15.900 --> 01:33:21.820]  than have him just blow over me because he doesn't consider me enough of a threat to
[01:33:21.820 --> 01:33:24.580]  worry about.
[01:33:24.580 --> 01:33:30.100]  So what about filing judicial complaints on everything, every little thing that he does
[01:33:30.100 --> 01:33:33.060]  against the rules, what would you do?
[01:33:33.060 --> 01:33:34.060]  That'll help.
[01:33:34.060 --> 01:33:39.340]  Because that puts a mark on his chart.
[01:33:39.340 --> 01:33:49.900]  All these district judges aspire to the appellate judge courts and you start putting judicial
[01:33:49.900 --> 01:33:53.180]  conduct complaints on their record.
[01:33:53.180 --> 01:33:57.420]  And it'll be like when I was in the military, they brought me in because I'd filed complaints
[01:33:57.420 --> 01:33:59.580]  with the attorney general.
[01:33:59.820 --> 01:34:07.140]  The commander said, I have six line numbers for senior master sergeant.
[01:34:07.140 --> 01:34:13.820]  I have 19 people with essentially equal time in grade.
[01:34:13.820 --> 01:34:14.820]  Who do I upgrade?
[01:34:14.820 --> 01:34:16.780]  Oh, this guy.
[01:34:16.780 --> 01:34:19.700]  He had the attorney general called on him.
[01:34:19.700 --> 01:34:21.940]  He's out.
[01:34:21.940 --> 01:34:25.580]  He's just looking for a reason to disqualify somebody.
[01:34:25.580 --> 01:34:27.780]  It didn't matter if the commander-
[01:34:27.780 --> 01:34:28.780]  He's just thinning out the competition.
[01:34:29.420 --> 01:34:33.100]  Yeah, it didn't matter if the complaint was valid or not, he didn't care.
[01:34:33.100 --> 01:34:40.300]  In the military, they said, if one of your troops complained against you, and this guy
[01:34:40.300 --> 01:34:46.780]  here, he didn't have his troops complaining against him, so you didn't do something right.
[01:34:46.780 --> 01:34:49.740]  That was how the military did these things.
[01:34:49.740 --> 01:34:52.140]  And here, they'll do the same thing.
[01:34:52.140 --> 01:34:57.260]  Now, we've got all these judges here that want to be on the appellate panel.
[01:34:57.820 --> 01:35:03.660]  Well, this has got three judicial conduct complaints against him, and these others don't
[01:35:03.660 --> 01:35:04.660]  have any.
[01:35:04.660 --> 01:35:05.660]  That's the criteria.
[01:35:05.660 --> 01:35:06.660]  This guy's out.
[01:35:06.660 --> 01:35:09.980]  This guy got, he gets drunk too much.
[01:35:09.980 --> 01:35:10.980]  He's out.
[01:35:10.980 --> 01:35:15.620]  They're just looking for a reason, and these judges know that.
[01:35:15.620 --> 01:35:19.300]  So you will have stained them.
[01:35:19.300 --> 01:35:25.980]  So every time a magistrate, for example, states something that's contrary to the correct
[01:35:26.020 --> 01:35:28.460]  application of the law to the facts-
[01:35:28.460 --> 01:35:33.060]  Pull out Walker v. Packer.
[01:35:33.060 --> 01:35:36.060]  Yeah.
[01:35:36.060 --> 01:35:39.340]  It is very explicit in that regard.
[01:35:39.340 --> 01:35:43.700]  I have to read this case law, because I haven't fully read it yet, but-
[01:35:43.700 --> 01:35:52.220]  It says a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts.
[01:35:52.220 --> 01:35:54.700]  Failure to do so is an abuse of discretion.
[01:35:54.700 --> 01:36:01.220]  And it goes on to say, the only thing you can appeal is an abuse of discretion by the
[01:36:01.220 --> 01:36:02.820]  trial judge.
[01:36:02.820 --> 01:36:09.660]  Well, the way I read the codes, if a public official abuses his discretion and in the
[01:36:09.660 --> 01:36:15.300]  process denies me the full and free access to or enjoyment of a right, that's an act
[01:36:15.300 --> 01:36:17.860]  of official misconduct.
[01:36:17.860 --> 01:36:21.060]  Or in Texas, it would be official oppression.
[01:36:21.060 --> 01:36:25.100]  It's a crime in every state.
[01:36:25.100 --> 01:36:32.460]  Just because he's on the federal bench does not take him outside of this state.
[01:36:32.460 --> 01:36:38.420]  He is in this state because that federal building does not belong to the federal government.
[01:36:38.420 --> 01:36:43.420]  All federal buildings are leased from the states.
[01:36:44.300 --> 01:36:51.660]  The only property that has been ceded to the states are federal prisons, major ports, post
[01:36:51.660 --> 01:36:55.660]  offices, and something else.
[01:36:55.660 --> 01:37:01.180]  I forget what it was, but not federal courthouses.
[01:37:01.180 --> 01:37:07.940]  If a judge shoots somebody in the courtroom, the sheriff has jurisdiction over that.
[01:37:07.940 --> 01:37:12.100]  It's not a federal crime, it's a state crime.
[01:37:12.100 --> 01:37:16.100]  The movie The Presidio, you ever see that one side of San Diego?
[01:37:16.100 --> 01:37:18.700]  I don't know.
[01:37:18.700 --> 01:37:27.180]  Sean Connery and, oh, who's the guy that played the boss in NCIS?
[01:37:27.180 --> 01:37:36.460]  Sean Connery is the head of security for the Presidio military base, and Arnold said his
[01:37:36.460 --> 01:37:38.260]  name, Mark Harmon.
[01:37:38.260 --> 01:37:41.500]  Mark Harmon is a local sheriff.
[01:37:41.500 --> 01:37:46.700]  Somebody gets killed on the base, the local sheriff has jurisdiction.
[01:37:46.700 --> 01:37:52.140]  Because that base has not been ceded to the federal government.
[01:37:52.140 --> 01:37:57.900]  The state had not released all of its claim on that property, so they still fell within
[01:37:57.900 --> 01:38:03.060]  the jurisdiction of the state, and so do federal courthouses.
[01:38:03.060 --> 01:38:06.860]  He filed criminally against him local.
[01:38:06.860 --> 01:38:10.860]  That'll make him nuts.
[01:38:11.060 --> 01:38:16.100]  Does the Commission on Judicial Performance, or whatever the federal equivalent is called,
[01:38:16.100 --> 01:38:21.100]  do they instantly tell judges, hey, there was a complaint filed against you?
[01:38:21.100 --> 01:38:29.020]  In the Fed, when you file a judicial conduct complaint, it's they actually have, it's just
[01:38:29.020 --> 01:38:31.900]  like a trial.
[01:38:31.900 --> 01:38:38.420]  The conduct complaint looks like a lawsuit.
[01:38:38.420 --> 01:38:46.700]  And they take it much more serious in the Fed than they do in the state.
[01:38:46.700 --> 01:38:51.700]  And that really puts a mark on his chart, big time.
[01:38:51.700 --> 01:38:52.700]  Interesting.
[01:38:52.700 --> 01:38:59.260]  I mean, what is the, like, because I remember another time that we talked, you kind of encouraged
[01:38:59.260 --> 01:39:07.980]  me to, that there are good judges, and I should go in with an open, I don't know, I don't
[01:39:07.980 --> 01:39:11.820]  know how you worded it, but it was like, there are good people.
[01:39:11.820 --> 01:39:16.460]  And I said, oh, I have problems believing this after my experiences.
[01:39:16.460 --> 01:39:22.740]  And I wonder where the middle line is to, like, I could obviously file a judicial complaint
[01:39:22.740 --> 01:39:27.020]  every step he does that's not according to the rules.
[01:39:27.020 --> 01:39:28.020]  But this could also be-
[01:39:28.020 --> 01:39:37.180]  Whatever is, why I'm saying that is if you go in thinking everybody's evil, it kind of
[01:39:37.460 --> 01:39:42.540]  takes away your sense of control.
[01:39:42.540 --> 01:39:48.660]  Just because I don't think these guys are evil, that doesn't mean I'm going to cut them
[01:39:48.660 --> 01:39:51.580]  any slack.
[01:39:51.580 --> 01:39:57.300]  I just sued a municipal court judge in the JP court because she wouldn't issue warrants
[01:39:57.300 --> 01:39:59.700]  on complaints I presented to him.
[01:39:59.700 --> 01:40:03.500]  I don't have an axe to grind against this guy.
[01:40:03.700 --> 01:40:08.980]  It's better that I take on someone I'm not mad at.
[01:40:08.980 --> 01:40:14.740]  Because I don't want anybody saying I did this out of anger or avarice.
[01:40:14.740 --> 01:40:17.300]  I don't have an axe to grind against him.
[01:40:17.300 --> 01:40:24.420]  I just expect him to follow the law the way he expects me to follow law.
[01:40:24.420 --> 01:40:30.860]  The problem we're having with most of our public officials is they are improperly trained.
[01:40:30.900 --> 01:40:38.900]  And they are by their experience given the idea they can do anything they want to.
[01:40:38.900 --> 01:40:45.220]  Somebody needs to sting them on occasion and let them know they can't.
[01:40:45.220 --> 01:40:52.220]  And because I consider most of them to be at least somewhat reputable human beings,
[01:40:52.220 --> 01:40:53.220]  it should work.
[01:40:53.220 --> 01:40:55.540]  They should, they'll pay attention to it.
[01:40:55.540 --> 01:40:59.260]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:40:59.260 --> 01:41:02.620]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[01:41:02.620 --> 01:41:06.460]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[01:41:06.460 --> 01:41:10.740]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[01:41:10.740 --> 01:41:16.380]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering
[01:41:16.380 --> 01:41:17.860]  the claims cost?
[01:41:17.860 --> 01:41:24.500]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your
[01:41:25.100 --> 01:41:32.100]  employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero
[01:41:32.100 --> 01:41:33.100]  copay.
[01:41:33.100 --> 01:41:38.700]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[01:41:38.700 --> 01:41:44.860]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[01:41:44.860 --> 01:41:50.500]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of
[01:41:50.500 --> 01:41:51.500]  credit.
[01:41:51.500 --> 01:41:58.500]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[01:42:22.500 --> 01:42:27.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:42:27.500 --> 01:42:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:38.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:42:38.500 --> 01:42:42.500]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:42:42.500 --> 01:42:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:51.500]  process tactics, and much more.
[01:42:51.500 --> 01:43:00.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:35.500]  Okay, we are back.
[01:43:35.500 --> 01:43:38.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  We're talking to Alex.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:41.500]  Alex, we really need to move along.
[01:43:41.500 --> 01:43:43.500]  We got a whole board full of callers.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  I wish you a wonderful night, and I'll talk to you guys another time.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  Thank you, Alex.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  All right.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  Thanks for calling.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  Okay.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:43:58.000]  Now we're going to Melissa in Georgia.
[01:43:58.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Hello, Melissa.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:02.000]  What do you have for us today?
[01:44:02.000 --> 01:44:03.000]  Hey, Randy.
[01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Hey, Brett.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Thanks for having me on.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  Good evening.
[01:44:06.500 --> 01:44:15.500]  I called a little while back, and we spoke about my son, who's 17, and he's gotten pulled
[01:44:15.500 --> 01:44:17.500]  into an adult court.
[01:44:17.500 --> 01:44:20.500]  I was charged with criminal trespass under a 500.
[01:44:20.500 --> 01:44:21.500]  We talked about that.
[01:44:21.500 --> 01:44:28.500]  But my actual, what's really come up here is that his 14-year-old brother was actually
[01:44:28.500 --> 01:44:32.500]  with him, and he's been brought with charges in a juvenile court as well.
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  The juvenile court's moving along a lot faster than the other ones.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:45.000]  So they've already set up a trial or a hearing for this coming, not this Monday, but next,
[01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  so it's a week away.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  And we had like a mock type of thing where his, and I'll tell you all the unconstitutional
[01:44:58.500 --> 01:45:05.500]  things that I have found going on in this juvenile star chamber, because if you think
[01:45:05.500 --> 01:45:10.500]  that the state court is unconstitutional, the juvenile court is a whole new level.
[01:45:10.500 --> 01:45:15.500]  And I've been listening to you guys for years, and you've prepared me well.
[01:45:15.500 --> 01:45:20.500]  So when I walk in there, I can see all these things, and I can see that it's an unclean
[01:45:20.500 --> 01:45:22.500]  courtroom.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  And let me just kind of start by kind of telling you all the major constitutional issues I
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000]  found here so you can see the big picture.
[01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:37.000]  The judge, I pulled her oath, just like Randy's always said to do, I pulled her oath, and
[01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  I pulled the property deed of this property.
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:41.000]  Obviously, the property is owned by the county.
[01:45:41.000 --> 01:45:47.000]  The judge in her oath says the word that she is employed by the county and that she's also
[01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  paid funds by the county.
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  Okay, so now we have a conflict of interest.
[01:45:52.500 --> 01:45:58.500]  She has appointed the public defender, whether he wants it or not, he can't fire her.
[01:46:00.500 --> 01:46:02.500]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, hold on, hold on, hold on.
[01:46:03.500 --> 01:46:04.500]  Say what?
[01:46:05.500 --> 01:46:07.500]  Of course she can fire her.
[01:46:08.500 --> 01:46:15.500]  Well, if he fires her, he's going to say, well, he can't, he's only 14, he can't represent
[01:46:15.500 --> 01:46:20.500]  himself, he has to have a lawyer, he has to have someone to represent him.
[01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:24.000]  Either I need to go hire a lawyer, but they won't let me.
[01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  Okay, okay, hold on.
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  I would not have suggested that you fire the lawyer.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  Okay.
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Lawyer is a low-hanging fruit.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  Have you instructed the lawyer about what she's to do?
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  Yes, I have.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Have you noticed the lawyer that you will bar-grieve her into the Stone Age if she doesn't?
[01:46:49.500 --> 01:46:50.500]  I have.
[01:46:50.500 --> 01:46:57.500]  I've let her know that I don't play around, that I mean business, and what I've already
[01:46:57.500 --> 01:47:02.500]  done so far, because I couldn't get open records, I already took it up with the state AG, but
[01:47:02.500 --> 01:47:06.500]  she knows that, you know, I'm not all bar, you know, I've got a little bite.
[01:47:06.500 --> 01:47:13.500]  But, so in the juvenile court, Star Chamber, they also don't have a jury here in Georgia.
[01:47:13.500 --> 01:47:18.500]  They only bench trials, so another point of Star Chamber.
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  The prosecutor, we showed up that day to do a continuant, because he had not, he would
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  help evidence.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:29.000]  He had not released any discoveries, especially some kind of video that shows them coming
[01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  out of a bathroom and laughing, and that's what their probable cause was.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  Okay, anyway, which is so weird.
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  Have you bar-grieved this prosecutor, this defender yet?
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  Not yet, not yet.
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  I was waiting to talk to you guys first to find out a good, solid...
[01:47:46.500 --> 01:47:50.500]  Have you bar-grieved the other side, prosecutor on the other side?
[01:47:50.500 --> 01:47:52.500]  Not yet.
[01:47:52.500 --> 01:48:01.500]  I have, I've got to put all that together, you know, I've got several things already
[01:48:01.500 --> 01:48:02.500]  laid out.
[01:48:02.500 --> 01:48:05.500]  Those are things that are in my purview to do.
[01:48:05.500 --> 01:48:11.500]  So the prosecutor also is, just like in your case, in the traffic case, Brett, he's only
[01:48:11.500 --> 01:48:14.500]  contractors with the court, he's not hired by the DA.
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:20.000]  Apparently the DA was completely, like, under his budget and he had to break ties with the
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  juvenile court.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  The juvenile court is only one of four juvenile courts in the state of Georgia that is not
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  part of the juvenile justice system, so it's somehow working as its own Walmart.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  And I'm trying to get to the bottom of that, I don't have any clues about that yet, but
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  yeah, there's just only so many hours in the day to work on this.
[01:48:39.500 --> 01:48:46.500]  The public defender, when we went in there to do the continuance, the prosecutor found
[01:48:46.500 --> 01:48:49.500]  that, you know, he didn't have the evidence.
[01:48:49.500 --> 01:48:54.500]  And so he threw out a little plea thing, said, hey, you could do some community service and
[01:48:54.500 --> 01:48:58.500]  pay a little fine, and this can be over and done with in just a minute.
[01:48:58.500 --> 01:49:03.500]  So I was telling my son that that's what, you know, that's what this meant, and he didn't
[01:49:03.500 --> 01:49:05.500]  understand what community service was, I explained it.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  And I told the public defender, I said, we don't, nobody's made a decision on this yet,
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  I'm just talking to him about this, and so we were getting pulled back in the courtroom
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  as if they're waiting for us to make a three-minute decision on that.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  And I told her, we don't have a decision made on that, I've been talking with him about
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  this.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  And, you know, I've been saying all along, he's innocent, I have proof of all of that,
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  I have no doubt in my mind that if we went to trial, he'd win in a heartbeat.
[01:49:31.500 --> 01:49:38.500]  But I'm seeing how the court's dirty, so how would he even get a fair trial?
[01:49:40.500 --> 01:49:45.500]  You just have to be prepared to appeal, and you have to be prepared to calmly document
[01:49:45.500 --> 01:49:53.500]  every single thing along the way so that you will be able to raise the proper issues when
[01:49:53.500 --> 01:49:54.500]  you go to the appellate court.
[01:49:54.500 --> 01:49:55.500]  Okay, I have a question.
[01:49:55.500 --> 01:49:56.500]  Just be prepared for that.
[01:49:56.500 --> 01:49:58.500]  I have a question.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  Why do you think the court is corrupt?
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  Well, because the judge is being employed by and being paid by the plaintiff.
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  No, that is the only way for a judge to be in the court.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  That's not something you can disqualify him for, or even show any bias.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  That's not an argument that'll get you anywhere.
[01:50:27.500 --> 01:50:36.500]  You could actually have a judge here who wants to use this as a way to keep the child from
[01:50:36.500 --> 01:50:38.500]  getting in more trouble later.
[01:50:38.500 --> 01:50:40.500]  They may actually be good guys.
[01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:45.500]  Have they given you a reason to believe that they're not good guys?
[01:50:45.500 --> 01:50:52.500]  He did, because what happened was when the public defender started coercing my son, she
[01:50:52.500 --> 01:50:55.500]  was doing it in secret with the prosecutor in front of me.
[01:50:55.500 --> 01:50:58.000]  She didn't even let me sit at the table with him.
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  I started all these secreties between them, and I overheard some things that she never
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  even said out in the hall to us, like him writing an apology letter and all this stuff,
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:08.000]  which he didn't do it.
[01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  So no, I'm not going to let my kid lie to the court and say he did.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:18.000]  So I raised my hand to be very respectful to the judge, and she said, oh, public defender,
[01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  I think you need to talk with the parent there.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  So she gets up, we're in our court, and I tell her this isn't something that was discussed
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  out there.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  No, we're just discussing it.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  It just felt weird to me, so I told the judge I don't feel comfortable with all the secrecy
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  going on.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  And a little later on at some point, I've got to get the documentation, she hired an
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  ad litem, which means that I don't even have any faith there anymore at this point.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:52.700]  Have you looked up the laws and rules on appointing a guardian ad litem?
[01:51:52.700 --> 01:51:57.700]  I don't think they can appoint a guardian ad litem when the child has a parent.
[01:51:57.700 --> 01:52:00.700]  Yeah, that's what it sounds like to me.
[01:52:00.700 --> 01:52:04.700]  There are three, I believe three reasons, and I don't have it pulled up right now, but
[01:52:04.700 --> 01:52:09.700]  one was like, you know, of course if a child has been abandoned, but mostly it's in court
[01:52:09.700 --> 01:52:11.700]  cases where it's a custody issue.
[01:52:11.700 --> 01:52:15.700]  This is not, this is a delinquency issue.
[01:52:15.700 --> 01:52:20.700]  And so it's really strange for her to do that, and I asked the ad litem, which he's a nice
[01:52:20.700 --> 01:52:23.700]  actually, he's a nice guy, kind of a butt kisser a little bit.
[01:52:23.700 --> 01:52:27.700]  He's trying to give me to tell him what to do in this case.
[01:52:27.700 --> 01:52:32.700]  And so, you know, I'm not giving him my consent, and I've told him all along, you don't get
[01:52:32.700 --> 01:52:34.700]  my consent to do anything.
[01:52:34.700 --> 01:52:39.700]  You know, if you want to help him, you can, you know, you're, and if you're told by the
[01:52:39.700 --> 01:52:42.700]  judge to do that, I can't stop you.
[01:52:42.700 --> 01:52:49.700]  But, you know, and he told me, oh, I can get him reduced down to just a few hours of community
[01:52:49.700 --> 01:52:53.700]  service and no, no fee, no apology letter or anything like that.
[01:52:53.700 --> 01:52:56.700]  And this can be all dismissed and over.
[01:52:56.700 --> 01:52:59.700]  And he makes it sound like a pretty package.
[01:52:59.700 --> 01:53:01.700]  And I'm thinking.
[01:53:01.700 --> 01:53:07.700]  Well, it would be a pretty package for somebody who's guilty and who wants to try to lessen
[01:53:07.700 --> 01:53:16.700]  the weight of the guilt and have, you know, more lightweight consequences.
[01:53:16.700 --> 01:53:21.700]  But for somebody that's not guilty.
[01:53:21.700 --> 01:53:27.700]  And cannot possibly, like you said, if he even writes an apology letter, that's a lie
[01:53:27.700 --> 01:53:29.700]  to the court.
[01:53:29.700 --> 01:53:33.700]  Yeah, and so do I.
[01:53:33.700 --> 01:53:35.700]  I have a question.
[01:53:35.700 --> 01:53:36.700]  Yeah.
[01:53:36.700 --> 01:53:38.700]  Who wants to fight this?
[01:53:38.700 --> 01:53:41.700]  You or your son?
[01:53:41.700 --> 01:53:45.700]  Well, my son is, he is 14.
[01:53:45.700 --> 01:53:50.700]  All he cares about is being cool, hanging out with friends, doing sports, you know,
[01:53:50.700 --> 01:53:52.700]  typical 14-year-old stuff.
[01:53:52.700 --> 01:53:54.700]  He doesn't want to worry about this stuff.
[01:53:54.700 --> 01:53:56.700]  He doesn't want to see me worrying about it.
[01:53:56.700 --> 01:54:01.700]  But I have seen so much corruption in the court, and I know I have the wisdom to look
[01:54:01.700 --> 01:54:07.700]  back and say, you know what, what if they, what if we took this little bribe or whatever
[01:54:07.700 --> 01:54:13.700]  I call it, a bribe, and then it comes back to, you know, bite him in the butt.
[01:54:13.700 --> 01:54:17.700]  They say it's going to be filled up, that it's with prejudice, that it's dismissed,
[01:54:17.700 --> 01:54:21.700]  and it won't come back on him or anything like that.
[01:54:21.700 --> 01:54:26.700]  Ask them if it will be expunged.
[01:54:26.700 --> 01:54:27.700]  I can ask that.
[01:54:27.700 --> 01:54:29.700]  I have asked that of his lawyer.
[01:54:29.700 --> 01:54:34.700]  He says, well, that's not really my purview, and I'm not sure how we would do that.
[01:54:34.700 --> 01:54:37.700]  Well, it's not at a law school.
[01:54:37.700 --> 01:54:42.700]  If they can't expunge it, then it's, and you're afraid this will happen.
[01:54:43.700 --> 01:54:50.700]  Mark him, actually won't, because he's 14.
[01:54:50.700 --> 01:54:55.700]  Nothing before 16 gets past 16.
[01:54:55.700 --> 01:54:59.700]  In some states, it's 18.
[01:54:59.700 --> 01:55:05.700]  So, you know, anything like college or anything, they can't get past 16.
[01:55:05.700 --> 01:55:09.700]  They can't consider anything because they're children.
[01:55:09.700 --> 01:55:15.700]  And that's why I'm wondering, he's 14, and, you know, 14, 15, kids go nuts.
[01:55:15.700 --> 01:55:23.700]  Parents, you know, they, parents in schools, they tend to try to teach them.
[01:55:23.700 --> 01:55:29.700]  And this court experience may not be a bad thing for him.
[01:55:29.700 --> 01:55:31.700]  I agree.
[01:55:31.700 --> 01:55:37.700]  When he's 19, 20, 21, it could get a whole lot worse.
[01:55:37.700 --> 01:55:38.700]  Hang on.
[01:55:38.700 --> 01:55:43.700]  About to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:55:43.700 --> 01:55:45.700]  We'll be right back.
[01:56:07.700 --> 01:56:11.700]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:56:11.700 --> 01:56:16.700]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:56:16.700 --> 01:56:20.700]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:56:20.700 --> 01:56:26.700]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:56:26.700 --> 01:56:31.700]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:56:31.700 --> 01:56:41.700]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:56:41.700 --> 01:56:45.700]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:56:45.700 --> 01:56:48.700]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:56:48.700 --> 01:56:58.700]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:56:59.700 --> 01:57:04.700]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:57:04.700 --> 01:57:08.700]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:57:08.700 --> 01:57:10.700]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:57:10.700 --> 01:57:15.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[01:57:15.700 --> 01:57:17.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:57:17.700 --> 01:57:20.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:57:20.700 --> 01:57:25.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57:25.700 --> 01:57:30.700]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:57:30.700 --> 01:57:33.700]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:57:33.700 --> 01:57:36.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:57:36.700 --> 01:57:40.700]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:57:40.700 --> 01:57:44.700]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:57:44.700 --> 01:57:46.700]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[01:57:46.700 --> 01:57:49.700]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[01:57:49.700 --> 01:57:52.700]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[01:57:52.700 --> 01:57:55.700]  Spar with an extra P.
[01:57:55.700 --> 01:58:01.700]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:58:01.700 --> 01:58:07.700]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:58:07.700 --> 01:58:09.700]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:58:09.700 --> 01:58:13.700]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:58:13.700 --> 01:58:16.700]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:58:16.700 --> 01:58:19.700]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:58:19.700 --> 01:58:24.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:58:29.700 --> 01:58:33.700]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:58:33.700 --> 01:58:36.700]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:58:36.700 --> 01:58:38.700]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:58:38.700 --> 01:58:41.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:58:41.700 --> 01:58:44.700]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:58:44.700 --> 01:58:46.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:58:46.700 --> 01:58:49.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:58:49.700 --> 01:58:54.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:58:54.700 --> 01:58:59.700]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:58:59.700 --> 01:59:02.700]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:59:02.700 --> 01:59:06.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:59:06.700 --> 01:59:10.700]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:59:10.700 --> 01:59:13.700]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:59:14.700 --> 01:59:18.700]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[01:59:18.700 --> 01:59:21.700]  around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:59:21.700 --> 01:59:25.700]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[01:59:25.700 --> 01:59:29.700]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:59:29.700 --> 01:59:32.700]  Get it? Two arms? Bear hug? Bear arms?
[01:59:32.700 --> 01:59:36.700]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[01:59:36.700 --> 01:59:37.700]  when he said,
[01:59:37.700 --> 01:59:42.700]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[01:59:42.700 --> 01:59:46.700]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[01:59:46.700 --> 01:59:49.700]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:59:49.700 --> 01:59:54.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:00:07.700 --> 02:00:09.700]  Thank you.
[02:00:38.700 --> 02:00:45.700]  And I can take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use.
[02:00:45.700 --> 02:00:52.700]  What I was good for the gander is gonna work for the goose.
[02:00:52.700 --> 02:01:00.700]  I know some architects. I know some engineers.
[02:01:00.700 --> 02:01:07.700]  They see the evidence. They know something seems queer.
[02:01:07.700 --> 02:01:13.700]  What's up with the blatant deception? What is the nature of what you might gain?
[02:01:13.700 --> 02:01:19.700]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Blue Law Radio, and we're talking to Melissa in Georgia.
[02:01:19.700 --> 02:01:24.700]  And Brett, you looked up something on attorney ad litem.
[02:01:24.700 --> 02:01:32.700]  Yes. Right before we went out, Melissa was mentioning that there are three reasons
[02:01:32.700 --> 02:01:39.700]  why an ad litem, guardian ad litem, may be appointed by the judge.
[02:01:39.700 --> 02:01:44.700]  And yeah, so we had the third reason.
[02:01:44.700 --> 02:01:47.700]  Melissa, you did mention what that third one was.
[02:01:47.700 --> 02:01:52.700]  And I was just noticing that is a little scary. It's kind of wide open.
[02:01:52.700 --> 02:02:02.700]  It says that if the judge believes that the parent is not going to act in the best interests of the child,
[02:02:02.700 --> 02:02:08.700]  unable or unwilling, so that's up to the judge's belief, which...
[02:02:08.700 --> 02:02:18.700]  You hit the nail on the head with the word scary because no parent wants the thought of someone else stepping in their role
[02:02:18.700 --> 02:02:25.700]  and trying to take over with their child, who obviously doesn't even know the child.
[02:02:25.700 --> 02:02:36.700]  And so this makes me very nervous. This is what's really got me in the unconstitutional practices here in this juvenile court.
[02:02:36.700 --> 02:02:41.700]  And the judge gets to have whatever say so if she wants to.
[02:02:41.700 --> 02:02:46.700]  Well, what would be the worst case scenario in this juvenile court?
[02:02:46.700 --> 02:02:52.700]  What could they do? I mean, obviously, they could set him up to have a record or something.
[02:02:52.700 --> 02:03:01.700]  But like Randy was saying a moment ago, that being since he's 14, that's not going to last.
[02:03:01.700 --> 02:03:07.700]  I don't know. What do you see as the thing that needs to really be avoided at all costs here?
[02:03:07.700 --> 02:03:17.700]  Right. So they all are slick and slimy and say, oh no, since he gets his little community service hours done
[02:03:17.700 --> 02:03:21.700]  and it'll be over and done with and they make it sound so easy and peasy and whatever.
[02:03:21.700 --> 02:03:28.700]  Well, there was a mom in that waiting room who was crying and I walked over to her and spoke with her
[02:03:28.700 --> 02:03:33.700]  and she said that her son is 12 years old, that they appointed him an ad litem.
[02:03:33.700 --> 02:03:42.700]  The ad litem has found all kind of ways to keep him, you know, go into this like boys camp or something like that.
[02:03:42.700 --> 02:03:49.700]  They've done fit him off. He's 12, you know, and there's some really horrible things happening to him there that's abusive.
[02:03:49.700 --> 02:03:51.700]  No way.
[02:03:51.700 --> 02:04:00.700]  And so it's, you know, it makes me nervous that there's an ad litem there.
[02:04:00.700 --> 02:04:07.700]  Yeah. So how can you avoid that ad litem being brought in?
[02:04:07.700 --> 02:04:15.700]  How can you avoid giving the judge an opportunity to say that the judge believes you're not going to look out for the child
[02:04:15.700 --> 02:04:24.700]  and we're going to just dump them off into our conveyor belt over here?
[02:04:25.700 --> 02:04:30.700]  Okay, hold on. Let's speak to parental rights in Georgia.
[02:04:30.700 --> 02:04:36.700]  What does the law say about parental rights in Georgia?
[02:04:36.700 --> 02:04:44.700]  Well, to me, I've been listening to you guys for so long that it doesn't matter what the law says pretty much.
[02:04:44.700 --> 02:04:47.700]  It's more of a saying by God.
[02:04:47.700 --> 02:04:55.700]  It does. You use the law as the tools to get to where you want to be.
[02:04:55.700 --> 02:05:09.700]  What does, let me ask AI, the law say about parental rights in Georgia?
[02:05:09.700 --> 02:05:19.700]  Let's see what it says. Unmarried fathers in Georgia.
[02:05:19.700 --> 02:05:28.700]  It's a little slow coming up, but you need to know what your rights are before you let somebody else.
[02:05:28.700 --> 02:05:31.700]  Paternity can be established.
[02:05:31.700 --> 02:05:38.700]  Legitimation. Legitimation is a process of establishing the father's legal rights.
[02:05:38.700 --> 02:05:49.700]  Mother's rights in Georgia. Mother's rights are those that extend to the mother of the child or the children when deciding a custody case.
[02:05:49.700 --> 02:05:57.700]  Parental power, according to OCGA 19-7-1.
[02:05:57.700 --> 02:06:09.700]  Parental power lies with the natural parents and a child's legal father is one of the limited number of related third parties who can seek custody of a legal parent.
[02:06:09.700 --> 02:06:13.700]  All of this is about family law.
[02:06:13.700 --> 02:06:22.700]  I need to know what parental rights you have over your juvenile child.
[02:06:22.700 --> 02:06:27.700]  Yes. Well, that's the word juvenile that I was going to come back to.
[02:06:27.700 --> 02:06:35.700]  When they use that word juvenile, they have a change word to have a different legal meaning.
[02:06:35.700 --> 02:06:40.700]  The word juvenile actually goes back to the word delinquent.
[02:06:40.700 --> 02:06:52.700]  In that kind of a situation under the law, if the child is thought to have committed a crime, then they're automatically changed from being my son to a delinquent.
[02:06:52.700 --> 02:06:54.700]  The same person is just given a whole new name.
[02:06:54.700 --> 02:07:01.700]  When it changed into a delinquent, now the parental rights are there.
[02:07:01.700 --> 02:07:05.700]  Now he's more of a responsible adult because he's committed a crime.
[02:07:05.700 --> 02:07:11.700]  I'm not quoting the law exactly, but it's something like that in there.
[02:07:11.700 --> 02:07:16.700]  The ad litem told me that he's asking for my son's phone number.
[02:07:16.700 --> 02:07:18.700]  I said, no, no, I don't give you consent.
[02:07:18.700 --> 02:07:25.700]  But he said at some point I'm going to be able to take him to the side privately and have a talk with him if I know what he wants.
[02:07:25.700 --> 02:07:28.700]  He said whether you allow it or not.
[02:07:28.700 --> 02:07:32.700]  He said I can actually go up to his school and talk to them about him.
[02:07:33.700 --> 02:07:43.700]  I have all these abilities that even in the courtroom, when you're not allowed at the table to hear what the prosecutor and the public defender are whispering about, I get a chance to sit at that table with them.
[02:07:43.700 --> 02:07:53.700]  So it makes me feel like the ad litem actually has more rights and abilities that they're being given than a parent in law.
[02:07:53.700 --> 02:07:56.700]  That's what makes this really scary.
[02:07:56.700 --> 02:08:11.700]  Naturally, thankfully, thank goodness for you guys who armed me with being aware of what I can and can't do because if I didn't know the things that I've heard you guys tell us, I would be scared.
[02:08:11.700 --> 02:08:16.700]  I'd be a scared mom like, oh my gosh, take the plea, just take the plea, let's get out of here.
[02:08:16.700 --> 02:08:18.700]  I don't want them after us.
[02:08:18.700 --> 02:08:22.700]  I don't need all that.
[02:08:22.700 --> 02:08:30.700]  But they're really kind of strong-armed people and I know there's got to be a better way to deal with all that.
[02:08:30.700 --> 02:08:32.700]  Okay.
[02:08:32.700 --> 02:08:48.700]  In Georgia, parental rights, I asked chat GPT what parental rights, what rights the parents have, what a juvenile has been accused of crime.
[02:08:48.700 --> 02:08:49.700]  Right to be informed.
[02:08:49.700 --> 02:08:57.700]  Parents have the right to be notified if their child is taken into custody or entitled to know charges against the child.
[02:08:57.700 --> 02:08:59.700]  Right to participate in proceedings.
[02:08:59.700 --> 02:09:05.700]  Parents have a right to attend all court hearings and meetings related to the child's case.
[02:09:05.700 --> 02:09:10.700]  They can provide input and advocate for their child during the process.
[02:09:10.700 --> 02:09:16.700]  We need to look up the code that that's referring to.
[02:09:16.700 --> 02:09:28.700]  You have a right to consult, let's see, parents have a right to, okay, you can provide input and advocate for their child during the process.
[02:09:28.700 --> 02:09:30.700]  Yeah, that's huge. Advocate for the child.
[02:09:30.700 --> 02:09:31.700]  Okay.
[02:09:31.700 --> 02:09:39.700]  And this other piece about appointing a guardian ad litem was, as you pointed out a moment ago, Melissa, this is only for dependency cases,
[02:09:39.700 --> 02:09:50.700]  which the court dependency courts are only about children who are allegedly abused, neglected, or not cared for.
[02:09:50.700 --> 02:09:52.700]  Exactly.
[02:09:52.700 --> 02:09:56.700]  So this is not a dependency proceeding.
[02:09:57.700 --> 02:10:14.700]  And so if they try to appoint a guardian ad litem, they're going to have to have somebody swear out an affidavit that says that this kid is not adequately cared for or somehow abused or neglected.
[02:10:14.700 --> 02:10:17.700]  So that's where they're going to have to take this in.
[02:10:17.700 --> 02:10:23.700]  Well, I'm not saying they would, but that's all it would take. That's the step that they would fill in, in between.
[02:10:23.700 --> 02:10:27.700]  And then they would connect the dots to, now we get to do what we want.
[02:10:27.700 --> 02:10:34.700]  I'm not really against you doing this apology letter and everything.
[02:10:34.700 --> 02:10:43.700]  If they would let him off with a pay $25 or some kind of fee and send an apology letter, it doesn't matter.
[02:10:43.700 --> 02:10:52.700]  Even if he didn't do it, I would be inclined, if it would be my child, I would think I would want to just go ahead and get it over with.
[02:10:52.700 --> 02:10:55.700]  Then you can sue them.
[02:10:55.700 --> 02:10:58.700]  You know, there was all this threat, duress and coercion.
[02:10:58.700 --> 02:11:02.700]  You scared me with all of this nonsense about taking my kid away.
[02:11:02.700 --> 02:11:08.700]  And I personally spoke with someone whose child was abused because of your nonsense.
[02:11:08.700 --> 02:11:10.700]  And you know, you really scared us.
[02:11:10.700 --> 02:11:14.700]  And so I'm suing you for all of this damages.
[02:11:14.700 --> 02:11:18.700]  Go after them afterwards, but get yourself and your son off the hook.
[02:11:18.700 --> 02:11:20.700]  I wouldn't be opposed to that a bit.
[02:11:20.700 --> 02:11:28.700]  I don't think you would be, you would be chickening out or disappointing the community or anything like that.
[02:11:28.700 --> 02:11:39.700]  Even if he has to put something on there, make an apology letter to something that he didn't do, or even if, you know, maybe he did part of it.
[02:11:39.700 --> 02:11:48.700]  He flipped the roll of toilet paper so that it spun something onto the ground and then somebody else spray painted something on the wall and he's being asked to apologize for both, whatever.
[02:11:48.700 --> 02:11:54.700]  Just, I see no harm in just nipping it in the bud, get them all out of there.
[02:11:54.700 --> 02:11:58.700]  And then there's no conversation about whether somebody is taking away your parental rights.
[02:11:58.700 --> 02:12:02.700]  There's only you suing them for the threat of it.
[02:12:02.700 --> 02:12:06.700]  Yeah, that's why I say it's scary.
[02:12:06.700 --> 02:12:09.700]  I don't know. What do you think, Randy?
[02:12:09.700 --> 02:12:13.700]  I'm looking up something here.
[02:12:13.700 --> 02:12:17.700]  You mean I just whacked eloquent and you didn't hear it?
[02:12:17.700 --> 02:12:21.700]  Yeah, I heard it.
[02:12:21.700 --> 02:12:28.700]  Yeah, you can, I heard part of it. You can, you can sue them later and that don't help much.
[02:12:28.700 --> 02:12:40.700]  What I'm looking for is what log, this keeps saying that parents in Georgia have a right to advocate for their child.
[02:12:40.700 --> 02:12:47.700]  Right, and then you've got the other word in the Constitution that says you have the right to counsel.
[02:12:47.700 --> 02:12:52.700]  So they say they're saying advocate, but they're not saying counsel.
[02:12:52.700 --> 02:12:55.700]  Okay, got it.
[02:12:55.700 --> 02:13:04.700]  Okay, Official Code of Georgia, Title 15, Chapter 11, Governor's Juvenile Court Proceedings.
[02:13:04.700 --> 02:13:13.700]  Code explicitly ensures that juveniles and their families are treated fairly and emphasizes family involvement in rehabilitation efforts.
[02:13:13.700 --> 02:13:24.700]  Provide, 15-11-151 provides for parent notification and involvement in proceedings when a child is disdained, chained or charged.
[02:13:24.700 --> 02:13:32.700]  We need to look at that one.
[02:13:32.700 --> 02:13:37.700]  15-11-15.
[02:13:37.700 --> 02:13:44.700]  Okay, take us out, Brett. I will look this up and have this when we come back on the other side.
[02:13:44.700 --> 02:13:58.700]  All right. Well, as we're coming to this next break, we see on the board, we've got Dawn, we've got Rebecca and Katherine in California.
[02:13:58.700 --> 02:14:03.700]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[02:14:03.700 --> 02:14:07.700]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[02:14:07.700 --> 02:14:12.700]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[02:14:12.700 --> 02:14:18.700]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[02:14:18.700 --> 02:14:22.700]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons.
[02:14:22.700 --> 02:14:24.700]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[02:14:24.700 --> 02:14:27.700]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[02:14:27.700 --> 02:14:31.700]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[02:14:31.700 --> 02:14:36.700]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[02:14:36.700 --> 02:14:38.700]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[02:14:38.700 --> 02:14:47.700]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[02:14:47.700 --> 02:14:58.700]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[02:14:59.700 --> 02:15:03.700]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[02:15:03.700 --> 02:15:10.700]  In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[02:15:10.700 --> 02:15:17.700]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law.
[02:15:17.700 --> 02:15:23.700]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[02:15:23.700 --> 02:15:33.700]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[02:15:33.700 --> 02:15:38.700]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[02:15:38.700 --> 02:15:48.700]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[02:15:48.700 --> 02:15:52.700]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[02:15:52.700 --> 02:15:59.700]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[02:15:59.700 --> 02:16:10.700]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[02:16:10.700 --> 02:16:27.700]  Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the Father can deliver you. So don't let bad mind people hurt you. And trust it and get behind you. Know what I mean? My friend, knowledge of children. Come on.
[02:16:27.700 --> 02:16:51.700]  Come on, trust in God, my friend. Tell him your problem, then. Call on his name once again. He will tell you know he worth the aid. Trust in God, my friend. Tell him your problem, then. Call on his name once again. He will tell you know he worth the aid.
[02:16:51.700 --> 02:17:12.700]  He is my king, man. He is everything. He is everything to me. That's why I call him. Don't tap me knee and I pray to him. Because he is the only one who could answer him. There is no business what wicked man say him. Mankind, you know, is bliss leading. I cannot trust in God, my friend.
[02:17:12.700 --> 02:17:22.700]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain rules my radio on this Friday. What day is it, Brett?
[02:17:22.700 --> 02:17:25.700]  Would you believe me if I said February 6th?
[02:17:25.700 --> 02:17:48.700]  Okay, I wouldn't believe February. Six days of December 2024. And we're talking to Melissa in Georgia. I spent the break trying to find the code that gives the parents standing in court. And I haven't found it yet.
[02:17:48.700 --> 02:17:57.700]  So where were you, Brett, when you were waxing so eloquent and I wasn't listening?
[02:17:57.700 --> 02:18:15.700]  I was encouraging her to consider the possibility of just going along with the plea, even if it means an apology letter under duress and coercion. Go ahead and just get off the hook so that there's nothing hanging over her son's heads.
[02:18:15.700 --> 02:18:42.700]  And if all that is is, you know, pay a $25 and give an apology letter or something like that, that would certainly be, I think it would be worth it. You can always go back as soon as that's done and go file a lawsuit against these people who are malicious prosecution, whatever you want to do.
[02:18:42.700 --> 02:19:04.700]  You know, putting them in the situation of threatening, take away parental rights without probable cause, all this, whatever needs to happen afterwards, then at least there's no danger of, hey, looks like you were about to send my son off to a sexual abuse camp or something.
[02:19:05.700 --> 02:19:09.700]  You know, let's just fix that.
[02:19:09.700 --> 02:19:28.700]  That's worrisome what I've already seen. This is her mom going through with her son. And I'd like them, they're paid hourly. So they, you know, what gives them the motivation to say, oh, the kid no longer needs help. Stop sending me a check.
[02:19:28.700 --> 02:19:48.700]  Right. So the ability to, and it looks like it's a, what I've seen in a lot of looks like it's a pretty broad ability to just keep the kid having services that they keep that paycheck coming in.
[02:19:48.700 --> 02:19:59.700]  And you can't fire. I've looked up to try to find out if the child can fire him and not saying that he's able to do that.
[02:19:59.700 --> 02:20:12.700]  The only thing I can think to go and do is go to the Superior Court and do a mandamus or an injunction. T.R.A. is something to stop this judge from doing what he's doing.
[02:20:12.700 --> 02:20:23.700]  We have to figure out what your parental rights are.
[02:20:23.700 --> 02:20:27.700]  So, you know, what standing you have?
[02:20:27.700 --> 02:20:44.700]  Well, this is what I told the ad litem when he tried to get me to consent. I told him that my son's rights are self-evident and that they're endowed by his creator, that me and my husband were brought in as vessel services with that and he wasn't brought in for that.
[02:20:44.700 --> 02:20:52.700]  So he has no rights to my son. That's how I left it with that.
[02:20:52.700 --> 02:21:01.700]  And he's actually been really nice about it. But I think he's just making the grass and he's trying to, you know, win me over.
[02:21:01.700 --> 02:21:11.700]  I don't know. It's hard to really say.
[02:21:11.700 --> 02:21:13.700]  Randy, you there?
[02:21:13.700 --> 02:21:29.700]  Yeah, I'm looking for parental rights in Georgia. Before we know anything, we need to know what you need to know what your rights are concerning your child in a criminal investigation.
[02:21:29.700 --> 02:21:35.700]  Otherwise, you have no idea what you're doing, what to do.
[02:21:35.700 --> 02:21:43.700]  And since I'm not in Georgia, I'm having trouble finding good, getting good results in Georgia.
[02:21:43.700 --> 02:21:49.700]  Generally, a search engine will give you results based on where you're at.
[02:21:49.700 --> 02:21:59.700]  And I need something that can tell it that I'm, or I can go in and tell the engine I'm in Georgia so it'll give me better hits on Georgia.
[02:21:59.700 --> 02:22:09.700]  Put the letters OCGA in front of any of your searches and that's the code that the law follows under.
[02:22:09.700 --> 02:22:15.700]  I don't know what it stands for, but it kind of references back to Georgia law.
[02:22:15.700 --> 02:22:23.700]  Okay.
[02:22:23.700 --> 02:22:26.700]  Is it ACD or ACDA?
[02:22:26.700 --> 02:22:35.700]  OCGA. So OC is in cat and GA is in Georgia.
[02:22:35.700 --> 02:22:39.700]  Okay, OCDA.
[02:22:39.700 --> 02:22:41.700]  OCGA.
[02:22:41.700 --> 02:22:44.700]  Oh, OCGA.
[02:22:44.700 --> 02:22:46.700]  OCGA, code of Georgia.
[02:22:46.700 --> 02:22:48.700]  Okay.
[02:22:48.700 --> 02:22:51.700]  Oscar, Charlie, Georgia.
[02:22:51.700 --> 02:22:55.700]  Georgia, golf, alpha.
[02:22:55.700 --> 02:22:58.700]  There we go.
[02:22:58.700 --> 02:23:05.700]  Okay, y'all go ahead and have meaningful conversation while I see what I can find here.
[02:23:05.700 --> 02:23:07.700]  I already had a light on.
[02:23:07.700 --> 02:23:10.700]  I was just going to take a nap.
[02:23:10.700 --> 02:23:13.700]  OCGA.
[02:23:13.700 --> 02:23:22.700]  When he talks about parental rights, I came up with something called, well now this is under domestic relations, so I don't know.
[02:23:22.700 --> 02:23:32.700]  I put it in delinquency, but it basically is, you know, well, they've got it separated between, you know, delinquency portions.
[02:23:32.700 --> 02:23:35.700]  But they do try to act like I'm nobody.
[02:23:35.700 --> 02:23:41.700]  And it's all up to my 14-year-old child to make a decision, you know, in a court.
[02:23:41.700 --> 02:23:43.700]  Yeah.
[02:23:43.700 --> 02:23:46.700]  And of course they take away civics classes in school.
[02:23:46.700 --> 02:23:50.700]  So how's he supposed to know any of this stuff?
[02:23:50.700 --> 02:23:52.700]  Yeah.
[02:23:52.700 --> 02:24:14.700]  Well, I think from what I've heard, if it were me, I would go for the, take the slap on the hand and do the apology letter under duress, under coercion, bar grieve the snot out of that prosecutor.
[02:24:14.700 --> 02:24:19.700]  And the same thing for the one who's supposedly on your side.
[02:24:19.700 --> 02:24:21.700]  You suspect he's a snake in the grass.
[02:24:21.700 --> 02:24:22.700]  Doesn't matter if he is or not.
[02:24:22.700 --> 02:24:26.700]  He has no business getting in the middle of your parental rights.
[02:24:26.700 --> 02:24:32.700]  So whether it's codified or not, I would just go ahead and bar grieve him.
[02:24:32.700 --> 02:24:39.700]  And you don't have to worry about anything hanging over your son's heads in that way.
[02:24:39.700 --> 02:24:42.700]  That's what I would think.
[02:24:42.700 --> 02:24:44.700]  Okay.
[02:24:44.700 --> 02:24:48.700]  Well, you can optionally sue them if you want to.
[02:24:48.700 --> 02:24:50.700]  Yeah.
[02:24:50.700 --> 02:25:00.700]  I've considered it too, but I have to also think about it's joint and linked to my 17-year-old who has a state case.
[02:25:00.700 --> 02:25:05.700]  And so whatever my 14-year-old please, it's linked together.
[02:25:05.700 --> 02:25:14.700]  So they're trying to basically say, well, you know, the two of them act as together because they're trying to say that like five things were broken, like a toilet paper roll holder or something.
[02:25:14.700 --> 02:25:19.700]  And I'm like, I don't think I've ever been in a public bathroom that ever had an actual functioning toilet paper roller.
[02:25:19.700 --> 02:25:21.700]  And then one thing was an outlet.
[02:25:21.700 --> 02:25:23.700]  And their outlets are metal.
[02:25:23.700 --> 02:25:25.700]  I'm like, how do you break a metal outlet?
[02:25:25.700 --> 02:25:34.700]  These bathrooms are in such terrible shape that a few months ago, like back in May, our commissioners voted for them to be renovated because they're so heavily used by the public.
[02:25:34.700 --> 02:25:46.700]  And they were open to the public for four days from the time kids went in to the time the report was made and that anybody could have come in and out of there and done anything.
[02:25:46.700 --> 02:25:48.700]  And it was probably already done.
[02:25:48.700 --> 02:25:49.700]  We took pictures in there.
[02:25:50.700 --> 02:25:52.700]  There's the sink falling off the wall.
[02:25:52.700 --> 02:25:55.700]  I mean, it's really, really old and raggedy.
[02:25:55.700 --> 02:25:58.700]  There's like fluid.
[02:25:58.700 --> 02:25:59.700]  What is that?
[02:25:59.700 --> 02:26:04.700]  That for the door where the hands like hinge fluid.
[02:26:04.700 --> 02:26:05.700]  The grease.
[02:26:05.700 --> 02:26:06.700]  Yeah.
[02:26:06.700 --> 02:26:07.700]  Yeah.
[02:26:07.700 --> 02:26:08.700]  There's grease all down the door.
[02:26:08.700 --> 02:26:11.700]  I mean, it's just that nasty.
[02:26:11.700 --> 02:26:17.700]  And so I'm like, how can you say that kids did any of that?
[02:26:17.700 --> 02:26:19.700]  Yeah, that's right.
[02:26:19.700 --> 02:26:34.700]  I already got a list of their work order labor hours and the labor hours to clean that was less than their average labor hours from May to September.
[02:26:34.700 --> 02:26:35.700]  Yeah.
[02:26:35.700 --> 02:26:36.700]  What about discovery?
[02:26:36.700 --> 02:26:50.700]  Have you considered whipping up some kind of discovery that discovery request for admission that, hey, we have no evidence that this was in a good shape before my children went in?
[02:26:50.700 --> 02:26:51.700]  Right.
[02:26:51.700 --> 02:26:52.700]  I have tried.
[02:26:52.700 --> 02:26:53.700]  I did that.
[02:26:53.700 --> 02:26:54.700]  And I'll see.
[02:26:54.700 --> 02:26:59.700]  The prosecutor says that if he doesn't, if he provides discovery, then there's.
[02:26:59.700 --> 02:27:06.700]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[02:27:06.700 --> 02:27:12.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment.
[02:27:12.700 --> 02:27:14.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[02:27:14.700 --> 02:27:18.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[02:27:18.700 --> 02:27:22.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[02:27:22.700 --> 02:27:24.700]  So protect your rights.
[02:27:24.700 --> 02:27:28.700]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:27:28.700 --> 02:27:29.700]  Privacy.
[02:27:29.700 --> 02:27:34.700]  It's worth hanging on to this public service announcement is brought to you by start page dot com.
[02:27:34.700 --> 02:27:38.700]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[02:27:38.700 --> 02:27:41.700]  Start over with start page.
[02:27:41.700 --> 02:27:46.700]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[02:27:46.700 --> 02:27:54.700]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected.
[02:27:54.700 --> 02:27:58.700]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[02:27:58.700 --> 02:28:05.700]  A senior's age, gender and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures.
[02:28:05.700 --> 02:28:08.700]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[02:28:08.700 --> 02:28:11.700]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[02:28:11.700 --> 02:28:14.700]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk in a few minutes.
[02:28:14.700 --> 02:28:19.700]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[02:28:19.700 --> 02:28:24.700]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:28:49.700 --> 02:28:51.700]  Do you believe there is more to the story?
[02:28:51.700 --> 02:28:54.700]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[02:28:54.700 --> 02:29:00.700]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[02:29:00.700 --> 02:29:05.700]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of his word?
[02:29:05.700 --> 02:29:11.700]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[02:29:11.700 --> 02:29:16.700]  where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[02:29:16.700 --> 02:29:23.700]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[02:29:23.700 --> 02:29:27.700]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[02:29:27.700 --> 02:29:31.700]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[02:29:31.700 --> 02:29:38.700]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[02:29:38.700 --> 02:29:42.700]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[02:29:42.700 --> 02:29:49.700]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[02:29:49.700 --> 02:29:55.700]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[02:29:55.700 --> 02:29:59.700]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[02:31:13.700 --> 02:31:20.700]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Cowden, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and Melissa, we're at an impasse.
[02:31:20.700 --> 02:31:26.700]  I get the impression you don't have a clue as to what you're doing.
[02:31:26.700 --> 02:31:34.700]  The reason I'm saying that is, is you don't know what your rights are.
[02:31:35.700 --> 02:31:39.700]  What standing do you have?
[02:31:39.700 --> 02:31:48.700]  And you can't determine what standing you have by what standing you think you should have.
[02:31:48.700 --> 02:31:52.700]  You need to be able to quote that chapter and verse.
[02:31:52.700 --> 02:31:54.700]  Yeah.
[02:31:54.700 --> 02:32:00.700]  Or case law. I'm not finding it in statute. It's probably in case law.
[02:32:01.700 --> 02:32:08.700]  I'm fine. And probably so. I'm fine. I mean, my rights to me are endowed by my Creator.
[02:32:08.700 --> 02:32:14.700]  No, no, no, no, no. Stop doing that. He told you about that.
[02:32:14.700 --> 02:32:21.700]  He didn't write those laws. Man did. And he told you, render unto Caesar.
[02:32:21.700 --> 02:32:25.700]  You and Caesar made up those laws. That's between you. Don't throw that stuff on me.
[02:32:25.700 --> 02:32:27.700]  That's the way I read it.
[02:32:27.700 --> 02:32:31.700]  I don't want to box myself in by some statute written by man.
[02:32:31.700 --> 02:32:35.700]  If you're wasting your time, you might as well get back out of the way.
[02:32:35.700 --> 02:32:40.700]  So all you're going to do is cause your kids trouble.
[02:32:40.700 --> 02:32:44.700]  You're not listening to your own Bible.
[02:32:44.700 --> 02:32:47.700]  It told you to render under Caesar.
[02:32:47.700 --> 02:32:54.700]  These are laws that your legislature created at your behest or your benefit.
[02:32:54.700 --> 02:32:56.700]  God didn't have anything to do with it.
[02:32:56.700 --> 02:33:02.700]  Now, God was intended to have guided those who created these.
[02:33:02.700 --> 02:33:07.700]  But the courts are not operated by God's laws.
[02:33:07.700 --> 02:33:14.700]  They should have been created in compliance and conformance with God's laws.
[02:33:14.700 --> 02:33:18.700]  But you can't come into court with God's law.
[02:33:18.700 --> 02:33:21.700]  Judge has two duties.
[02:33:21.700 --> 02:33:26.700]  He must first determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence.
[02:33:26.700 --> 02:33:32.700]  Then next, he must apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[02:33:32.700 --> 02:33:38.700]  He must apply Georgia law, not God's law.
[02:33:38.700 --> 02:33:42.700]  That's just the rules of where we're at.
[02:33:42.700 --> 02:33:48.700]  If you're trying to go in with God's law, you're trying to fly by the seat of your pants.
[02:33:48.700 --> 02:33:50.700]  That won't work.
[02:33:50.700 --> 02:33:52.700]  You got to go in.
[02:33:52.700 --> 02:34:00.700]  When you say you have a right, you have to be able to say you have a right in accordance with this.
[02:34:00.700 --> 02:34:06.700]  Yeah, and when you point to something, like whether you're talking to that guardian ad litem
[02:34:06.700 --> 02:34:11.700]  about how your parental rights trump his appointment or anything like that,
[02:34:11.700 --> 02:34:18.700]  you have to use the language of the Georgia code as well.
[02:34:18.700 --> 02:34:22.700]  Whether it's Georgia Constitution or Georgia legislature,
[02:34:22.700 --> 02:34:29.700]  you have to be able to point to something that he recognizes and that he has to,
[02:34:29.700 --> 02:34:37.700]  because he may not care one way or the other about a Bible or whether there even is such a thing as a creator.
[02:34:37.700 --> 02:34:44.700]  Some people seem to imagine a world where things create themselves and there is no creator.
[02:34:44.700 --> 02:34:48.700]  You have to speak to him in a way that you can use, not only cite it,
[02:34:48.700 --> 02:34:56.700]  but use the language that you find in that Georgia Constitution and Georgia legislature, the statutes.
[02:34:56.700 --> 02:35:02.700]  I can tell you from experience, it is very satisfying.
[02:35:02.700 --> 02:35:08.700]  You hear me tell these stories about going in and jerking all these guys around?
[02:35:08.700 --> 02:35:14.700]  I jerk them around by chapter and verse.
[02:35:14.700 --> 02:35:18.700]  You've heard me, if you listen to my show much, you've heard me state,
[02:35:18.700 --> 02:35:24.700]  never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[02:35:24.700 --> 02:35:33.700]  You must always make proactive statements of law out of the mouth of their legislature or the courts.
[02:35:33.700 --> 02:35:40.700]  I went in, we were at the district court in Austin, Texas,
[02:35:40.700 --> 02:35:44.700]  and Mary Krennic and this guy, Mike, who is absolutely nuts.
[02:35:44.700 --> 02:35:47.700]  So they were trying to get the minutes of the grand jury.
[02:35:47.700 --> 02:35:51.700]  They went in and asked for the records of the grand jury.
[02:35:51.700 --> 02:35:56.700]  And the clerk told them, we can't give you those. You can't get those. They're private.
[02:35:56.700 --> 02:36:01.700]  So I was there. They came to me and I went over to the clerk and I said,
[02:36:01.700 --> 02:36:08.700]  I want to see the minutes of the grand jury as defined by Article 20A.304.
[02:36:08.700 --> 02:36:11.700]  I think it's B.
[02:36:11.700 --> 02:36:15.700]  She said, one moment, please.
[02:36:15.700 --> 02:36:22.700]  She goes away, comes back. It'll take us about 30 minutes to get those together.
[02:36:22.700 --> 02:36:26.700]  No argument, no crapola.
[02:36:26.700 --> 02:36:30.700]  She went and looked at the law and it told her exactly what she was supposed to give me.
[02:36:30.700 --> 02:36:32.700]  And she wouldn't got it.
[02:36:32.700 --> 02:36:35.700]  Never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[02:36:35.700 --> 02:36:38.700]  Don't say I got parental rights.
[02:36:38.700 --> 02:36:45.700]  Say I have parental rights in accordance with this statute or this case law.
[02:36:45.700 --> 02:36:49.700]  That works.
[02:36:49.700 --> 02:36:55.700]  Now, he's a lawyer and he's got all this legal training.
[02:36:55.700 --> 02:37:03.700]  Yeah, maybe. But he doesn't specialize in parental rights.
[02:37:03.700 --> 02:37:05.700]  You need to do that.
[02:37:05.700 --> 02:37:11.700]  So you'll come in knowing more about parental rights than he does.
[02:37:11.700 --> 02:37:14.700]  That's when they really start paying attention to you.
[02:37:14.700 --> 02:37:19.700]  You need to know what the law and the case law is concerning.
[02:37:19.700 --> 02:37:27.700]  When a judge can point an attorney ad litem for a child who has a parent.
[02:37:27.700 --> 02:37:32.700]  And who has there's no dependency issue.
[02:37:32.700 --> 02:37:38.700]  There's not any accusations of the abuse and all that neglect.
[02:37:38.700 --> 02:37:40.700]  This is not one of those situations.
[02:37:40.700 --> 02:37:44.700]  When you look for when you can do it for someone with a parent,
[02:37:44.700 --> 02:37:53.700]  he will list precisely what he has to determine before he can issue a point an attorney ad litem.
[02:37:53.700 --> 02:37:57.700]  And I guarantee you one thing's not going to be in there.
[02:37:57.700 --> 02:38:00.700]  The parent is a painless in the anus.
[02:38:00.700 --> 02:38:03.700]  That's not going to be in there.
[02:38:03.700 --> 02:38:05.700]  The parent comes in and gives me a hard time.
[02:38:05.700 --> 02:38:08.700]  That's not going to be in there either.
[02:38:08.700 --> 02:38:11.700]  So you need you need to find that case law.
[02:38:11.700 --> 02:38:14.700]  It's this is laser focused.
[02:38:14.700 --> 02:38:16.700]  What you're looking at.
[02:38:16.700 --> 02:38:19.700]  This is not as hard as it seems.
[02:38:19.700 --> 02:38:26.700]  The hardest part is getting that first case on point.
[02:38:26.700 --> 02:38:29.700]  Have you have you read much case law?
[02:38:29.700 --> 02:38:31.700]  Oh, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
[02:38:31.700 --> 02:38:33.700]  OK, then you get how to do it.
[02:38:33.700 --> 02:38:38.700]  If you you get that first case, that's near point.
[02:38:38.700 --> 02:38:45.700]  What the courts generally do is they address issues on both sides of a point.
[02:38:45.700 --> 02:38:48.700]  We read we we rule this here.
[02:38:48.700 --> 02:38:49.700]  We rule this here.
[02:38:49.700 --> 02:38:50.700]  We rule.
[02:38:50.700 --> 02:38:52.700]  So this is both sides.
[02:38:52.700 --> 02:38:54.700]  Here's what we ruled in the middle.
[02:38:54.700 --> 02:39:01.700]  If I can get a case close to point, then I like to use case text,
[02:39:01.700 --> 02:39:07.700]  because with case text, when you get the case over on the right hand side,
[02:39:07.700 --> 02:39:11.700]  there's a column and there's one section that says citations.
[02:39:11.700 --> 02:39:20.700]  It'll show you how many times this case has been cited and in what cases it was cited in.
[02:39:20.700 --> 02:39:24.700]  That gives you all the other cases around your point.
[02:39:25.700 --> 02:39:34.700]  So I bring up a case that talks about parental rights in a juvenile criminal prosecution.
[02:39:34.700 --> 02:39:35.700]  That's what we need.
[02:39:35.700 --> 02:39:37.700]  That's what I was looking for here.
[02:39:37.700 --> 02:39:40.700]  But finding that first case is a little difficult.
[02:39:40.700 --> 02:39:42.700]  Once I get the first one.
[02:39:42.700 --> 02:39:51.700]  I go over those citations and it'll have five hundred or a thousand cases that have cited this case.
[02:39:51.700 --> 02:39:55.700]  And you just it's got a little synopsis of what they're about.
[02:39:55.700 --> 02:40:00.700]  And you go down and you'll find some that go right to what you're after.
[02:40:00.700 --> 02:40:02.700]  This is not an issue.
[02:40:02.700 --> 02:40:04.700]  That's new.
[02:40:04.700 --> 02:40:06.700]  This is a very common issue.
[02:40:06.700 --> 02:40:10.700]  There should be mountains of case law on this subject.
[02:40:10.700 --> 02:40:11.700]  Right.
[02:40:11.700 --> 02:40:14.700]  And I agree with them in the group.
[02:40:14.700 --> 02:40:17.700]  Some people in the group have sent me some links.
[02:40:17.700 --> 02:40:21.700]  Some of them sent me some links regarding it.
[02:40:21.700 --> 02:40:22.700]  There's a lot of verbiage.
[02:40:22.700 --> 02:40:26.700]  So I've got to go and compare it to the situation and make sure that it's all.
[02:40:26.700 --> 02:40:27.700]  OK.
[02:40:27.700 --> 02:40:28.700]  This is how I do it.
[02:40:28.700 --> 02:40:30.700]  I don't need to hold cases.
[02:40:30.700 --> 02:40:33.700]  So I like case law because it does this really well.
[02:40:33.700 --> 02:40:36.700]  You put in case text and whatever the case is.
[02:40:36.700 --> 02:40:37.700]  And it takes you there.
[02:40:37.700 --> 02:40:38.700]  OK.
[02:40:38.700 --> 02:40:40.700]  And what are you looking for?
[02:40:40.700 --> 02:40:43.700]  Take a keyword that goes to what you're looking for.
[02:40:43.700 --> 02:40:47.700]  And hit Control F and type in the keyword.
[02:40:47.700 --> 02:40:52.700]  It'll pop you right down to the section you need to address.
[02:40:52.700 --> 02:40:54.700]  That way you can go through them quickly.
[02:40:54.700 --> 02:40:55.700]  We need to move on.
[02:40:55.700 --> 02:40:58.700]  I've got a bunch of calls and run out of time.
[02:40:58.700 --> 02:41:01.700]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[02:41:01.700 --> 02:41:05.700]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[02:41:05.700 --> 02:41:09.700]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[02:41:09.700 --> 02:41:14.700]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[02:41:14.700 --> 02:41:16.700]  by lowering the claims cost?
[02:41:16.700 --> 02:41:22.700]  The CHAMP plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[02:41:22.700 --> 02:41:27.700]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care,
[02:41:27.700 --> 02:41:31.700]  and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay.
[02:41:31.700 --> 02:41:37.700]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[02:41:37.700 --> 02:41:43.700]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[02:41:43.700 --> 02:41:48.700]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value,
[02:41:48.700 --> 02:41:50.700]  or pay down lines of credit.
[02:41:50.700 --> 02:41:58.700]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[02:41:58.700 --> 02:42:02.700]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[02:42:02.700 --> 02:42:05.700]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[02:42:05.700 --> 02:42:10.700]  Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[02:42:10.700 --> 02:42:14.700]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[02:42:14.700 --> 02:42:18.700]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[02:42:18.700 --> 02:42:22.700]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[02:42:22.700 --> 02:42:27.700]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[02:42:27.700 --> 02:42:33.700]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[02:42:33.700 --> 02:42:37.700]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[02:42:37.700 --> 02:42:42.700]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[02:42:42.700 --> 02:42:48.700]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[02:42:48.700 --> 02:42:51.700]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[02:42:51.700 --> 02:42:59.700]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[02:43:33.700 --> 02:43:39.700]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[02:43:39.700 --> 02:43:45.700]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[02:43:45.700 --> 02:43:51.700]  I give my message out to anyone in shot and distance.
[02:43:51.700 --> 02:43:57.700]  I vote for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance.
[02:43:57.700 --> 02:44:02.700]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting.
[02:44:02.700 --> 02:44:07.700]  I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons.
[02:44:17.700 --> 02:44:18.700]  Okay, we are back.
[02:44:18.700 --> 02:44:20.700]  Randy Kelton, Red Fountain, rule of law radio.
[02:44:20.700 --> 02:44:25.700]  And Melissa, before I let you go, I got to tell you a story.
[02:44:25.700 --> 02:44:30.700]  I got a guy in Arizona, call me out, he's being prosecuted.
[02:44:30.700 --> 02:44:36.700]  He had patriot plates on, and they see his car in a church parking lot.
[02:44:36.700 --> 02:44:39.700]  They wait until he pulls out, they pull him over.
[02:44:39.700 --> 02:44:44.700]  He's getting on all this patriot stuff, and he doesn't consent to anything,
[02:44:44.700 --> 02:44:48.700]  and they don't have jurisdiction, and on and on.
[02:44:48.700 --> 02:44:51.700]  They get him out, they're PO'd now.
[02:44:51.700 --> 02:44:57.700]  He had a pistol in the floorboard of the car, and he told them about it
[02:44:57.700 --> 02:45:00.700]  after he pissed him off.
[02:45:00.700 --> 02:45:05.700]  And they charged him with, accused him of not telling him he had the pistol.
[02:45:05.700 --> 02:45:08.700]  It's in the floorboard, and it's not loaded.
[02:45:08.700 --> 02:45:16.700]  But they charged him with two felonies, one Class B misdemeanor, and one Class C.
[02:45:16.700 --> 02:45:23.700]  He had some patriot guy writing all these patriot pleadings, charged him $11,000.
[02:45:24.700 --> 02:45:29.700]  And then he asked me to look at it, and I look at it, and I said,
[02:45:29.700 --> 02:45:33.700]  Arnold, is this the hill you want to die on?
[02:45:33.700 --> 02:45:37.700]  Is this your primary fight?
[02:45:37.700 --> 02:45:40.700]  He said, no. What do you want to do?
[02:45:40.700 --> 02:45:43.700]  He said, I want to advocate for the Catholic Church.
[02:45:43.700 --> 02:45:46.700]  Then call these guys.
[02:45:46.700 --> 02:45:51.700]  The only problem I see here is you pissed them off,
[02:45:51.700 --> 02:45:55.700]  and they're just trying to pay you back.
[02:45:55.700 --> 02:46:00.700]  So call them and tell them that you had this patriot guy tell you all this nonsense.
[02:46:00.700 --> 02:46:02.700]  It turned out to be nonsense.
[02:46:02.700 --> 02:46:06.700]  And file all this idiot paperwork.
[02:46:06.700 --> 02:46:10.700]  Would you just dismiss or ignore all that stuff?
[02:46:10.700 --> 02:46:14.700]  What can we do to just fix this and make it go away?
[02:46:14.700 --> 02:46:17.700]  Yeah. Did you just ask him to apologize?
[02:46:18.700 --> 02:46:21.700]  Yeah. No.
[02:46:21.700 --> 02:46:23.700]  Just, you know, how can we fix this?
[02:46:23.700 --> 02:46:26.700]  How can we best handle this?
[02:46:26.700 --> 02:46:32.700]  And the guy said, well, you got $500 up as a bond.
[02:46:32.700 --> 02:46:39.700]  If you'll just plead guilty to a failure to display a valid license plate,
[02:46:39.700 --> 02:46:42.700]  which is not even a moving violation,
[02:46:42.700 --> 02:46:46.700]  and forego the bond for court costs and fine,
[02:46:46.700 --> 02:46:49.700]  we'll drop all this other stuff.
[02:46:49.700 --> 02:46:57.700]  He paid this guy $11,000 to file this stupid pleadings.
[02:46:57.700 --> 02:47:04.700]  And he didn't first figure out what he wanted at the end of the day.
[02:47:04.700 --> 02:47:09.700]  So Jessica, what do you want at the end of the day?
[02:47:09.700 --> 02:47:16.700]  And can you get these guys to agree to give you that?
[02:47:16.700 --> 02:47:24.700]  What would be the least acceptable outcome?
[02:47:24.700 --> 02:47:26.700]  If you don't know where you're going,
[02:47:26.700 --> 02:47:29.700]  it's a very good chance you'll wind up somewhere else.
[02:47:29.700 --> 02:47:33.700]  So what could you accept as an outcome?
[02:47:33.700 --> 02:47:34.700]  Right. Yeah.
[02:47:34.700 --> 02:47:35.700]  I mean, at this point,
[02:47:35.700 --> 02:47:39.700]  it feels like I'm under duress to have to accept what they're doing.
[02:47:39.700 --> 02:47:42.700]  I can tell you that my child is a diabetic,
[02:47:42.700 --> 02:47:47.700]  and I don't want to have to put all his medical information through the court.
[02:47:47.700 --> 02:47:51.700]  He was administering his insulin at that time.
[02:47:51.700 --> 02:47:56.700]  And I have it on a glucose monitor reading that he wears on his body.
[02:47:56.700 --> 02:48:00.700]  Oh, that's not what I'm asking.
[02:48:00.700 --> 02:48:18.700]  What would be the least acceptable outcome that you could accept?
[02:48:18.700 --> 02:48:21.700]  I don't like for him to have to confess to something he didn't do.
[02:48:21.700 --> 02:48:23.700]  Now, I can make him a donation check.
[02:48:23.700 --> 02:48:24.700]  I don't mind that.
[02:48:24.700 --> 02:48:27.700]  He can go clean up the beach because we live on the beach.
[02:48:27.700 --> 02:48:28.700]  He can do community service, whatever.
[02:48:28.700 --> 02:48:29.700]  He likes that.
[02:48:29.700 --> 02:48:33.700]  He likes the idea of that.
[02:48:33.700 --> 02:48:37.700]  I'm thinking what would do the children the best, the most good?
[02:48:37.700 --> 02:48:44.700]  If you can get an outcome where it doesn't affect the children's record in the long run,
[02:48:44.700 --> 02:48:47.700]  and they're both juveniles, it won't.
[02:48:47.700 --> 02:48:53.700]  But we'll give them a reason to be cautious and make sure this kind of stuff never happens again.
[02:48:53.700 --> 02:48:55.700]  I'm not saying they did this,
[02:48:55.700 --> 02:49:01.700]  but I was 14, 15, 16, 17 once.
[02:49:01.700 --> 02:49:06.700]  And I'm not going to tell you all the mischief we got into.
[02:49:06.700 --> 02:49:09.700]  I could throw an egg for riding on a bicycle.
[02:49:09.700 --> 02:49:12.700]  This was before everybody had air conditioners.
[02:49:12.700 --> 02:49:16.700]  I could heave an egg over my head sideways,
[02:49:16.700 --> 02:49:21.700]  and it wasn't good enough to be able to get the egg through somebody's window.
[02:49:21.700 --> 02:49:28.700]  If you were good at it, you could hit the windowsill and splatter all over the room.
[02:49:28.700 --> 02:49:32.700]  We were hoodlums.
[02:49:32.700 --> 02:49:33.700]  We did that kind of stuff.
[02:49:33.700 --> 02:49:34.700]  Kids do stuff.
[02:49:34.700 --> 02:49:45.700]  And my father was real good at giving us object lessons that carried me well in the rest of my life.
[02:49:45.700 --> 02:49:49.700]  I'm not saying don't teach your kids to fight.
[02:49:49.700 --> 02:49:53.700]  Don't not teach your kids to fight for themselves.
[02:49:53.700 --> 02:50:01.700]  But if you go in assuming everybody's a bad guy, everybody will come up a bad guy.
[02:50:01.700 --> 02:50:10.700]  But you might try to say to the judge, look, what can we do that won't harm these children?
[02:50:10.700 --> 02:50:14.700]  They feel like they're innocent.
[02:50:14.700 --> 02:50:20.700]  What can we do to give them the impression that the courts are fair and honest,
[02:50:20.700 --> 02:50:25.700]  and they'll get a fair shake with public officials?
[02:50:25.700 --> 02:50:28.700]  I'm just trying to teach my kids how life works.
[02:50:28.700 --> 02:50:31.700]  What can we do to give them the best outcome?
[02:50:31.700 --> 02:50:37.700]  And you will be surprised what these guys will do.
[02:50:37.700 --> 02:50:41.700]  I assure you, they got kids of their own.
[02:50:41.700 --> 02:50:45.700]  And they have the same kind of problems.
[02:50:45.700 --> 02:50:51.700]  And we're all looking for how to effectively raise our children.
[02:50:51.700 --> 02:50:54.700]  And fortunately, you've got the Bible.
[02:50:54.700 --> 02:50:58.700]  This is coming from somebody who's not at all religious.
[02:50:58.700 --> 02:51:05.700]  But I watched all this nonsense about this woke generation and all these people that are jumping up and down
[02:51:05.700 --> 02:51:08.700]  and fighting with these guys back and forth.
[02:51:08.700 --> 02:51:14.700]  Listen, I'm telling them, guys, just read the Bible.
[02:51:14.700 --> 02:51:21.700]  The Bible is 6,000 years of cultural wisdom.
[02:51:21.700 --> 02:51:24.700]  If you don't believe in God or all that, just throw that out.
[02:51:24.700 --> 02:51:26.700]  Just ignore that part.
[02:51:26.700 --> 02:51:31.700]  Read the part of the Bible that tells you how to live your life.
[02:51:31.700 --> 02:51:37.700]  It'll explain to you how to raise your children, how to live your life, how to deal with other people.
[02:51:37.700 --> 02:51:40.700]  It's a great prescription for life.
[02:51:40.700 --> 02:51:47.700]  So from that perspective, I agree with what you're doing, but you can't bring it into court as the Bible.
[02:51:47.700 --> 02:51:49.700]  And I don't think you need to.
[02:51:49.700 --> 02:51:55.700]  I think if you sit down with these people and say, look, how can we find the best outcome for these children?
[02:51:55.700 --> 02:52:00.700]  They will probably bend over backwards to give you a best outcome.
[02:52:01.700 --> 02:52:03.700]  Okay.
[02:52:03.700 --> 02:52:04.700]  Okay.
[02:52:04.700 --> 02:52:05.700]  I'm making note of that.
[02:52:05.700 --> 02:52:07.700]  And thank you for the case text.
[02:52:07.700 --> 02:52:08.700]  I'm advised.
[02:52:08.700 --> 02:52:09.700]  I've already got that pulled up.
[02:52:09.700 --> 02:52:10.700]  They know my rights.
[02:52:10.700 --> 02:52:14.700]  But if I thought for one second my kids were guilty, I'd make them, I want them to pay their consequences.
[02:52:14.700 --> 02:52:15.700]  Don't get me wrong at all.
[02:52:15.700 --> 02:52:17.700]  I just have proof that they did.
[02:52:17.700 --> 02:52:21.700]  So that's why I'm just trying to fight for them a little bit.
[02:52:21.700 --> 02:52:23.700]  Tell the judge that.
[02:52:23.700 --> 02:52:26.700]  I'm sure.
[02:52:26.700 --> 02:52:29.700]  Yeah, that would be a really good sound bite for the judgment.
[02:52:29.700 --> 02:52:32.700]  Yeah, you're trying to do the best for your kids.
[02:52:32.700 --> 02:52:43.700]  And you don't want to give the kids the impression that everybody out there is bad and evil.
[02:52:43.700 --> 02:52:47.700]  Want them to live in a world where they feel comfortable.
[02:52:47.700 --> 02:52:50.700]  And what can we do to give them a good outcome?
[02:52:50.700 --> 02:52:54.700]  Even though they don't believe they're innocent, you believe they're not.
[02:52:54.700 --> 02:52:56.700]  You know, they believe they're innocent.
[02:52:56.700 --> 02:52:58.700]  You believe they're not.
[02:52:58.700 --> 02:53:03.700]  How can we come to some mutually acceptable agreement?
[02:53:03.700 --> 02:53:06.700]  There are better fights to have.
[02:53:06.700 --> 02:53:07.700]  Okay.
[02:53:07.700 --> 02:53:14.700]  Well, I just I've seen to me times where people get in the system and get saturated into it.
[02:53:14.700 --> 02:53:16.700]  And once you're in it, your target.
[02:53:16.700 --> 02:53:23.700]  And I'm really trying to keep that from happening, especially when they're innocent.
[02:53:23.700 --> 02:53:27.700]  When I have proof of their innocence, I should say that I have absolute proof.
[02:53:27.700 --> 02:53:33.700]  Well, you're preaching to the choir here.
[02:53:33.700 --> 02:53:36.700]  Very well aware of how screwed up the system is.
[02:53:36.700 --> 02:53:44.700]  But what I just did, I just sued a municipal judge.
[02:53:44.700 --> 02:53:49.700]  But I went in and set him up and played him like a cheap fiddle.
[02:53:49.700 --> 02:53:54.700]  I don't think that this judge is not evil in any way.
[02:53:54.700 --> 02:53:57.700]  He's not intentionally corrupt.
[02:53:57.700 --> 02:54:02.700]  He just does things the way he's been trained to do things.
[02:54:02.700 --> 02:54:09.700]  While I don't think he's a bad guy and clerks and everybody says he's a really nice guy, and he probably is.
[02:54:09.700 --> 02:54:12.700]  He's just been trained poorly.
[02:54:12.700 --> 02:54:21.700]  So when I spank him good in the courts, it will be with the best of intentions.
[02:54:22.700 --> 02:54:27.700]  Like my grandkids, I love them dearly.
[02:54:27.700 --> 02:54:32.700]  But if one of them runs out in the road, I'm fixing to tan his hide.
[02:54:32.700 --> 02:54:36.700]  I try to do it from that perspective.
[02:54:36.700 --> 02:54:41.700]  It helps to keep me grounded.
[02:54:41.700 --> 02:54:46.700]  Keeps me from losing my perspective.
[02:54:46.700 --> 02:54:50.700]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[02:54:50.700 --> 02:54:51.700]  Thank you.
[02:54:51.700 --> 02:54:53.700]  And we really need to get moving.
[02:54:53.700 --> 02:54:55.700]  We got a whole bunch of callers.
[02:54:55.700 --> 02:54:57.700]  We only got one hours left.
[02:54:57.700 --> 02:54:58.700]  Thank you, Melissa.
[02:54:58.700 --> 02:55:03.700]  When we come back, we're going to go to Rebecca.
[02:55:03.700 --> 02:55:05.700]  Oh, I got 45 seconds.
[02:55:05.700 --> 02:55:16.700]  OK, Melissa, in 45 seconds, say something insightful and informative and uplifting.
[02:55:16.700 --> 02:55:18.700]  What?
[02:55:18.700 --> 02:55:19.700]  She's gone.
[02:55:19.700 --> 02:55:24.700]  Maybe I can get something insightful out of the next caller.
[02:55:24.700 --> 02:55:25.700]  OK.
[02:55:25.700 --> 02:55:28.700]  Rebecca, you got 10 seconds.
[02:55:28.700 --> 02:55:30.700]  Say something insightful.
[02:55:32.700 --> 02:55:34.700]  You caught me off guard here.
[02:55:34.700 --> 02:55:35.700]  OK.
[02:55:35.700 --> 02:55:36.700]  OK.
[02:55:36.700 --> 02:55:37.700]  Never mind.
[02:55:37.700 --> 02:55:38.700]  You're too late.
[02:55:38.700 --> 02:55:39.700]  OK.
[02:55:39.700 --> 02:55:41.700]  Randy Kelton, Red Fountain Rue La Radio.
[02:55:41.700 --> 02:55:43.700]  We'll be right back.
[02:55:48.700 --> 02:55:52.700]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[02:55:52.700 --> 02:55:59.700]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[02:55:59.700 --> 02:56:04.700]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[02:56:04.700 --> 02:56:11.700]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[02:56:11.700 --> 02:56:16.700]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[02:56:16.700 --> 02:56:26.700]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[02:56:26.700 --> 02:56:39.700]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[02:56:39.700 --> 02:56:43.700]  That's 888-551-0102.
[02:56:43.700 --> 02:56:47.700]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[02:56:50.700 --> 02:56:57.700]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[02:57:00.700 --> 02:57:04.700]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[02:57:04.700 --> 02:57:07.700]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[02:57:07.700 --> 02:57:09.700]  Our liberty depends on it.
[02:57:09.700 --> 02:57:15.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[02:57:15.700 --> 02:57:17.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[02:57:17.700 --> 02:57:21.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[02:57:21.700 --> 02:57:25.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:57:25.700 --> 02:57:27.700]  So protect your rights.
[02:57:27.700 --> 02:57:31.700]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:57:31.700 --> 02:57:33.700]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[02:57:33.700 --> 02:57:37.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com.
[02:57:37.700 --> 02:57:41.700]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:57:41.700 --> 02:57:44.700]  Start over with Startpage.
[02:57:44.700 --> 02:57:47.700]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[02:57:47.700 --> 02:57:50.700]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[02:57:50.700 --> 02:57:53.700]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[02:57:53.700 --> 02:57:59.700]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[02:57:59.700 --> 02:58:05.700]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[02:58:05.700 --> 02:58:08.700]  Third party? Third Amendment? Get it?
[02:58:08.700 --> 02:58:15.700]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[02:58:15.700 --> 02:58:20.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:58:30.700 --> 02:58:34.700]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[02:58:34.700 --> 02:58:39.700]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[02:58:39.700 --> 02:58:45.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[02:58:45.700 --> 02:58:51.700]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[02:58:51.700 --> 02:58:56.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:58:56.700 --> 02:59:01.700]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:59:01.700 --> 02:59:04.700]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[02:59:04.700 --> 02:59:11.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:59:11.700 --> 02:59:14.700]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:59:15.700 --> 02:59:20.700]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[02:59:20.700 --> 02:59:26.700]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[02:59:26.700 --> 02:59:29.700]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[02:59:29.700 --> 02:59:33.700]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[02:59:33.700 --> 02:59:38.700]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[02:59:38.700 --> 02:59:45.700]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[02:59:45.700 --> 02:59:52.700]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[02:59:52.700 --> 02:59:57.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:00:46.700 --> 03:00:58.700]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Frout, and Rue La Radio on this, the sixth day of December, 2024.
[03:00:58.700 --> 03:01:01.700]  And we're talking to Rebecca in Indiana.
[03:01:01.700 --> 03:01:05.700]  Okay, what do you have for us today?
[03:01:05.700 --> 03:01:12.700]  Well, to start off, since you caught me off guard before break, I actually do have something insightful for you.
[03:01:12.700 --> 03:01:14.700]  Oh, good.
[03:01:14.700 --> 03:01:23.700]  If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.
[03:01:23.700 --> 03:01:24.700]  Wait a minute, I didn't get that.
[03:01:24.700 --> 03:01:28.700]  Oh, that's deep.
[03:01:28.700 --> 03:01:36.700]  If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.
[03:01:36.700 --> 03:01:42.700]  Very well put. Absolutely have.
[03:01:42.700 --> 03:01:53.700]  Okay, what do you have for us today?
[03:01:53.700 --> 03:02:03.700]  I guess last night we were talking about the conflict statute that I was being charged with,
[03:02:03.700 --> 03:02:12.700]  and I had a question, since we didn't quite get to it, on what I can do about that.
[03:02:12.700 --> 03:02:18.700]  Wait, bring me back up to speed.
[03:02:18.700 --> 03:02:27.700]  I was charged with disorderly conduct, and under the statute, the substitute of that,
[03:02:27.700 --> 03:02:31.700]  it was the engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct,
[03:02:31.700 --> 03:02:47.700]  and the wordage on the charging document from the prosecutor's office suggests that I should be charged with the other substitute.
[03:02:47.700 --> 03:02:59.700]  The first thing is, what are the elements of the crime you're charged with?
[03:02:59.700 --> 03:03:06.700]  It engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct.
[03:03:06.700 --> 03:03:17.700]  Okay, inciting or tumultuous conduct, that is about as clear as mud.
[03:03:17.700 --> 03:03:23.700]  What does that mean?
[03:03:23.700 --> 03:03:39.700]  If you looked at case law on this, I'm going to suspect you cannot commit that crime when only a police officer is present.
[03:03:39.700 --> 03:03:43.700]  And when it's only verbal, either one.
[03:03:43.700 --> 03:03:50.700]  And I think we looked at some of the law last night, and it did go to only, if it's only verbal, they couldn't charge.
[03:03:50.700 --> 03:03:53.700]  You need to look at the case law on that.
[03:03:53.700 --> 03:04:01.700]  Yeah, the code reads a person who recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct.
[03:04:01.700 --> 03:04:05.700]  Wait a minute, are you using a hands-free device?
[03:04:05.700 --> 03:04:07.700]  Yes.
[03:04:07.700 --> 03:04:11.700]  That's why you sound so muffled. Can you get rid of that?
[03:04:11.700 --> 03:04:14.700]  Yeah.
[03:04:14.700 --> 03:04:16.700]  Is that better?
[03:04:16.700 --> 03:04:18.700]  Okay, that's better.
[03:04:18.700 --> 03:04:20.700]  Okay.
[03:04:20.700 --> 03:04:23.700]  Good, we got the high tones back.
[03:04:23.700 --> 03:04:29.700]  Yeah.
[03:04:29.700 --> 03:04:46.700]  I looked this up already, but the wordage of the prosecutor's office suggests that I made unreasonable noise when asked to stop.
[03:04:46.700 --> 03:04:51.700]  And that has nothing to do with tumultuous conduct or fighting.
[03:04:51.700 --> 03:04:57.700]  What I'm looking for is policemen are a special case.
[03:04:57.700 --> 03:05:10.700]  In Texas, Texas law or Texas case law says you cannot breach a policeman's peace, period.
[03:05:10.700 --> 03:05:18.700]  And this tumultuous conduct sounds like a breach of the peace claim.
[03:05:18.700 --> 03:05:26.700]  The tumultuous or exciting conduct could only incite the police officer.
[03:05:26.700 --> 03:05:32.700]  And under Texas law, you cannot incite a police officer.
[03:05:32.700 --> 03:05:40.700]  Right. Well, I looked up the Indiana definition of the legal definition of tumultuous conduct,
[03:05:40.700 --> 03:05:54.700]  and it said something like it engages in behavior that would otherwise cause injury to the subject or destruction of property.
[03:05:54.700 --> 03:06:03.700]  Did this have any case law in support?
[03:06:03.700 --> 03:06:07.700]  Have you tried looking it up in a legal dictionary?
[03:06:07.700 --> 03:06:15.700]  I did, and I'm trying to remember where exactly I found that at.
[03:06:15.700 --> 03:06:35.700]  I think I was looking it up on just the law.
[03:06:35.700 --> 03:06:47.700]  I put in tumultuous conduct and I come up with Indianapolis disorderly conduct defense.
[03:06:47.700 --> 03:06:50.700]  We need some case law to describe.
[03:06:50.700 --> 03:07:00.700]  We need tumultuous conduct, engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct, which is defined by 35-45-1-1.
[03:07:00.700 --> 03:07:08.700]  So look up Indiana code 35-45-1.
[03:07:08.700 --> 03:07:14.700]  See the scope here.
[03:07:14.700 --> 03:07:17.700]  This case law.
[03:07:17.700 --> 03:07:43.700]  Can you move the microphone a little further from your mouth?
[03:07:43.700 --> 03:07:45.700]  Yeah.
[03:07:45.700 --> 03:07:47.700]  That's better.
[03:07:47.700 --> 03:07:52.700]  Okay, sorry.
[03:07:52.700 --> 03:07:55.700]  Did you hear any of that?
[03:07:55.700 --> 03:07:59.700]  I couldn't understand it. Can you say that again?
[03:07:59.700 --> 03:08:16.700]  Yeah, I found on fine law that tumultuous conduct means conduct that results in or is likely to result in serious bodily injury to a person or substantial damage to property.
[03:08:16.700 --> 03:08:19.700]  Did they allege that?
[03:08:19.700 --> 03:08:34.700]  Okay, so by this tumultuous conduct cannot be verbal only.
[03:08:34.700 --> 03:08:46.700]  Can you, with your voice, reach C over high C breath that'll break crystal?
[03:08:46.700 --> 03:08:48.700]  I don't know.
[03:08:48.700 --> 03:08:59.700]  Well, you could you could comment that that's about the only way you could imagine committing tumultuous conduct with verbally only.
[03:08:59.700 --> 03:09:08.700]  That if you could reach a high enough tone, if there's any crystal around, you might break it.
[03:09:08.700 --> 03:09:11.700]  Okay, does that sound ridiculous?
[03:09:11.700 --> 03:09:13.700]  It should.
[03:09:13.700 --> 03:09:17.700]  It indicates how ridiculous the claim is.
[03:09:17.700 --> 03:09:24.700]  This should get a motion to strike the charging instrument as insufficient.
[03:09:24.700 --> 03:09:42.700]  Yeah, because the wordage from the deputy prosecuting attorney was that I recklessly, knowingly or intentionally made unreasonable noise and continued to do so after being asked.
[03:09:42.700 --> 03:09:50.700]  Okay, what statute makes it a crime to make unreasonable noise after you're asked to stop?
[03:09:50.700 --> 03:10:01.700]  That would be the disorderly conduct statute or sub statute 35-45-1-1-A2.
[03:10:01.700 --> 03:10:08.700]  35-35-1-A2. Can you read that one for us?
[03:10:08.700 --> 03:10:18.700]  Okay.
[03:10:18.700 --> 03:10:32.700]  Sorry, it's 3A2 and a person recklessly, knowingly or intentionally makes unreasonable noise and continues to do so after being asked to stop.
[03:10:32.700 --> 03:10:35.700]  Is that what you're charged with?
[03:10:35.700 --> 03:10:37.700]  No.
[03:10:37.700 --> 03:10:40.700]  Oh, okay.
[03:10:40.700 --> 03:10:52.700]  I sent you guys through Telegram the copy of the criminal information that I received from the prosecutor's office.
[03:10:52.700 --> 03:10:55.700]  Yeah, I saw that.
[03:10:55.700 --> 03:11:12.700]  And this is what we were talking about, that you, even though there's a mismatch there, they've used the language from subsection A2, which seems to more closely connect with the assertions they're trying to make about your behavior.
[03:11:12.700 --> 03:11:19.700]  They've used the language from A2, but they've charged you at the top by citing A1.
[03:11:19.700 --> 03:11:39.700]  And it's possible, although unlikely, that you can get a judge to throw that out just because they've made a mistake in their charging instrument and what they've charged doesn't exist.
[03:11:39.700 --> 03:11:46.700]  You know, they've misaligned their accusation.
[03:11:46.700 --> 03:12:02.700]  Well, I still say that you would like to prepare yourself for both of those statutes. Be prepared to defend against A1 and A2, the elements of them, each one.
[03:12:02.700 --> 03:12:07.700]  The key factor here is going to be that they're policemen.
[03:12:08.700 --> 03:12:12.700]  And you can't reach a policeman's piece.
[03:12:24.700 --> 03:12:30.700]  No, no, don't do that. Don't do that. Stop, stop, stop. Stop defending yourself.
[03:12:30.700 --> 03:12:37.700]  That is knee-jerk. That will get you convicted every time.
[03:12:37.700 --> 03:12:45.700]  You always want to say you're innocent. No, no, no. We haven't got to that point yet.
[03:12:45.700 --> 03:12:54.700]  They haven't made their claim yet. We don't talk about whether you're guilty or innocent until they've filed a proper claim.
[03:12:54.700 --> 03:12:55.700]  Right.
[03:12:58.700 --> 03:13:09.700]  So how can I try and convince a judge to get this thrown out because of the mismatch on the statute?
[03:13:10.700 --> 03:13:26.700]  You challenge the sufficiency of the charging instrument as it fails to allege facts that beat the elements of the crime.
[03:13:26.700 --> 03:13:35.700]  Well, it charges validity of the charging instrument.
[03:13:35.700 --> 03:13:44.700]  Yes, I'm trying to find something. We need case law on breach of a policeman's piece. That's going to be key.
[03:13:44.700 --> 03:13:46.700]  Yeah.
[03:13:46.700 --> 03:13:52.700]  Okay, hang on. Go to our sponsors, Randy, Kelley, and Brett Fountain. We'll be right back.
[03:13:57.700 --> 03:14:03.700]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[03:14:03.700 --> 03:14:07.700]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[03:14:07.700 --> 03:14:13.700]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[03:14:13.700 --> 03:14:19.700]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[03:14:19.700 --> 03:14:25.700]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[03:14:25.700 --> 03:14:32.700]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[03:14:32.700 --> 03:14:37.700]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[03:14:37.700 --> 03:14:39.700]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[03:14:39.700 --> 03:14:45.700]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner.
[03:14:45.700 --> 03:14:48.700]  Or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com.
[03:14:48.700 --> 03:14:50.700]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[03:14:50.700 --> 03:14:58.700]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[03:14:58.700 --> 03:15:03.700]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[03:15:03.700 --> 03:15:07.700]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed.
[03:15:07.700 --> 03:15:12.700]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[03:15:12.700 --> 03:15:19.700]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[03:15:19.700 --> 03:15:20.700]  How can I help logos?
[03:15:20.700 --> 03:15:22.700]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[03:15:22.700 --> 03:15:28.700]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos by ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[03:15:28.700 --> 03:15:30.700]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[03:15:30.700 --> 03:15:33.700]  Now, go to logosradio.network.com.
[03:15:33.700 --> 03:15:36.700]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[03:15:36.700 --> 03:15:41.700]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[03:15:41.700 --> 03:15:42.700]  Do I pay extra?
[03:15:42.700 --> 03:15:43.700]  No.
[03:15:43.700 --> 03:15:45.700]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[03:15:45.700 --> 03:15:46.700]  No.
[03:15:46.700 --> 03:15:47.700]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[03:15:47.700 --> 03:15:49.700]  No. I mean, yes.
[03:15:49.700 --> 03:15:55.700]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[03:15:55.700 --> 03:15:56.700]  You're welcome.
[03:15:56.700 --> 03:15:58.700]  Happy holidays, logos.
[03:16:06.700 --> 03:16:09.700]  Oh, come on.
[03:16:37.700 --> 03:16:39.700]  Oh,
[03:16:45.700 --> 03:16:47.700]  if I can't get everything,
[03:17:07.700 --> 03:17:10.700]  if we can't get all these crazy
[03:17:11.700 --> 03:17:13.700]  wants to see
[03:17:36.700 --> 03:17:38.700]  a ranger
[03:17:41.700 --> 03:17:43.700]  I want to reach a diamond
[03:17:54.700 --> 03:17:56.700]  Okay, we are back.
[03:17:56.700 --> 03:18:03.700]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain Wheel of Law Radio on this Friday, the sixth day of December
[03:18:03.700 --> 03:18:05.700]  two thousand and twenty four.
[03:18:05.700 --> 03:18:09.700]  And we're talking to Rebecca in Indiana.
[03:18:10.700 --> 03:18:18.700]  Okay. The key thing here is, is that you were arguing with a policeman who had falsely arrested your husband.
[03:18:18.700 --> 03:18:23.700]  And they charged you for arguing with them.
[03:18:25.700 --> 03:18:29.700]  I'm not finding any case law on breach of police.
[03:18:29.700 --> 03:18:35.700]  What I'll do, what we need to do as I know I can find it in Texas law.
[03:18:35.700 --> 03:18:40.700]  See if I can bounce off a test, Texas law and get to Indiana.
[03:18:42.700 --> 03:18:50.700]  But so far, I'm not having much luck and I don't have time while I'm doing the shows because I have to mentally focus on it.
[03:18:50.700 --> 03:18:52.700]  But that's what you need to find.
[03:18:52.700 --> 03:19:00.700]  You need to argue that yelling at a police officer is often protected as free speech under the First Amendment.
[03:19:00.700 --> 03:19:01.700]  There we go.
[03:19:01.700 --> 03:19:02.700]  There we go.
[03:19:02.700 --> 03:19:06.700]  Particularly if it is criticism or expression of dissent.
[03:19:07.700 --> 03:19:09.700]  That's where you can look.
[03:19:11.700 --> 03:19:13.700]  First Amendment, yelling at police.
[03:19:16.700 --> 03:19:18.700]  Wait, you are unmuted.
[03:19:18.700 --> 03:19:19.700]  Let's see.
[03:19:19.700 --> 03:19:21.700]  Looks like you're muted.
[03:19:21.700 --> 03:19:23.700]  Okay, that should.
[03:19:24.700 --> 03:19:25.700]  Rebecca, you there?
[03:19:25.700 --> 03:19:26.700]  Yeah.
[03:19:26.700 --> 03:19:27.700]  Yeah.
[03:19:27.700 --> 03:19:29.700]  Okay, now we can hear you.
[03:19:29.700 --> 03:19:30.700]  Okay.
[03:19:30.700 --> 03:19:32.700]  I got a hit on.
[03:19:32.700 --> 03:19:38.700]  I did find was Houston versus Hill 482, US 451.
[03:19:41.700 --> 03:19:47.700]  And I actually did bring up this case law to the prosecutor in my last hearing.
[03:19:50.700 --> 03:19:51.700]  I was just.
[03:19:52.700 --> 03:19:57.700]  Did you bring it up to him or did you file it in a motion as an argument in a motion?
[03:19:58.700 --> 03:19:59.700]  I just brought it up to him.
[03:19:59.700 --> 03:20:01.700]  This is a pretrial conference.
[03:20:03.700 --> 03:20:10.700]  Did they bring you before a magistrate and hold an examining trial or preliminary hearing?
[03:20:10.700 --> 03:20:12.700]  Yeah, the initial hearing.
[03:20:13.700 --> 03:20:14.700]  What consisted?
[03:20:14.700 --> 03:20:16.700]  What was the initial hearing?
[03:20:16.700 --> 03:20:18.700]  When did they do the initial hearing?
[03:20:19.700 --> 03:20:21.700]  That was October 1st.
[03:20:21.700 --> 03:20:23.700]  When did they arrest you?
[03:20:24.700 --> 03:20:26.700]  I actually wasn't arrested.
[03:20:26.700 --> 03:20:33.700]  They waited for three or four months to charge me with this after the incident in April.
[03:20:34.700 --> 03:20:35.700]  Okay.
[03:20:35.700 --> 03:20:43.700]  When you first appeared, did they hold a preliminary hearing where a judge examined into the sufficiency
[03:20:43.700 --> 03:20:47.700]  of the allegation and made a determination of probable cause?
[03:20:48.700 --> 03:20:58.700]  That was filed when the prosecutor received the paperwork from the officer.
[03:20:58.700 --> 03:21:00.700]  Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
[03:21:01.700 --> 03:21:04.700]  That must be the first hearing.
[03:21:06.700 --> 03:21:07.700]  Okay.
[03:21:07.700 --> 03:21:12.700]  This is, Gerstein Pugh requires that all the states hold a preliminary hearing.
[03:21:12.700 --> 03:21:20.700]  In 1215 AD, the duke drugged King John down to the River Thames, threatened to cut his
[03:21:20.700 --> 03:21:24.700]  head off if he didn't sign the Magna Carta Libertatum.
[03:21:24.700 --> 03:21:26.700]  Signed it.
[03:21:26.700 --> 03:21:31.700]  Had a provision that if a sheriff arrests someone for any reason, they would take him
[03:21:31.700 --> 03:21:35.700]  directly to the nearest magistrate and explain themselves.
[03:21:35.700 --> 03:21:38.700]  A magistrate makes a determination of probable cause.
[03:21:38.700 --> 03:21:40.700]  Did they do that?
[03:21:40.700 --> 03:21:41.700]  No.
[03:21:42.700 --> 03:21:50.700]  Then that should be a primary argument that they denied you in procedural due process.
[03:21:51.700 --> 03:21:52.700]  Okay.
[03:21:52.700 --> 03:21:54.700]  Therefore, you have a right to dismissal.
[03:21:56.700 --> 03:22:05.700]  Read the criminal procedure code, Indiana, on arrest without a warrant or arrest with
[03:22:05.700 --> 03:22:06.700]  a warrant.
[03:22:07.700 --> 03:22:09.700]  Specifically on arrests.
[03:22:10.700 --> 03:22:13.700]  Or particular magistrates.
[03:22:17.700 --> 03:22:20.700]  It goes to how you get jurisdiction.
[03:22:21.700 --> 03:22:24.700]  I'll explain Texas so you know what to look for.
[03:22:24.700 --> 03:22:35.700]  In Texas, a criminal complaint gives a magistrate jurisdiction for the purpose of holding an
[03:22:35.700 --> 03:22:38.700]  examination into the sufficiency of an allegation.
[03:22:39.700 --> 03:22:47.700]  If a person is arrested for an on-site offense or on an existing warrant, they are to be
[03:22:47.700 --> 03:22:52.700]  taken directly to the nearest magistrate, and the magistrate is to examine into the
[03:22:52.700 --> 03:22:54.700]  sufficiency of the allegation.
[03:22:54.700 --> 03:22:57.700]  He decides whether you stand and answer or not.
[03:22:57.700 --> 03:23:01.700]  If he does not find probable cause, he sends you home.
[03:23:02.700 --> 03:23:11.700]  If he does find probable cause, that gives the magistrate then forwards his determination
[03:23:11.700 --> 03:23:19.700]  to the clerk of the court, and that transfers jurisdiction from the magistrate to the court.
[03:23:20.700 --> 03:23:21.700]  All right.
[03:23:21.700 --> 03:23:27.700]  Well, here in the Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure says when a prosecuting attorney
[03:23:27.700 --> 03:23:33.700]  receives information concerning the commission of a crime, the prosecuting attorney or deputy
[03:23:33.700 --> 03:23:39.700]  prosecuting attorney acting without a grand jury may apply to a court of criminal jurisdiction
[03:23:39.700 --> 03:23:45.700]  for a subpoena due to seek them ordering a person better than a target of the criminal
[03:23:45.700 --> 03:23:50.700]  investigation to produce books, papers, documents, photographs, or tangible objects.
[03:23:51.700 --> 03:23:54.700]  A request must include an affidavit under oath.
[03:23:55.700 --> 03:23:57.700]  Okay.
[03:23:57.700 --> 03:24:00.700]  What must they appear?
[03:24:00.700 --> 03:24:03.700]  Who must they appear before?
[03:24:07.700 --> 03:24:10.700]  It doesn't say.
[03:24:10.700 --> 03:24:14.700]  They acting without a grand jury may apply to a grand jury.
[03:24:14.700 --> 03:24:15.700]  No, no, no.
[03:24:15.700 --> 03:24:17.700]  A grand jury is secondary.
[03:24:17.700 --> 03:24:23.700]  The Gerstein-Pew federal case requires that the first hearing be a preliminary hearing,
[03:24:23.700 --> 03:24:26.700]  a hearing to determine probable cause.
[03:24:26.700 --> 03:24:35.700]  If Indiana allows the prosecutor to secure a subpoena, it must be a subpoena to appear
[03:24:35.700 --> 03:24:39.700]  before a magistrate for the purpose of making a determination.
[03:24:41.700 --> 03:24:43.700]  That's a federal requirement.
[03:24:43.700 --> 03:24:46.700]  If Indiana doesn't do it, violation of federal law.
[03:24:48.700 --> 03:24:51.700]  And most states don't do it.
[03:24:54.700 --> 03:25:00.700]  That is the key to disrupting this police state.
[03:25:02.700 --> 03:25:07.700]  If a policeman arrests you for any reason and he has to take you directly to the nearest
[03:25:07.700 --> 03:25:13.700]  magistrate and explain himself, 90% of the trash we're dealing with will go away.
[03:25:13.700 --> 03:25:17.700]  If these policemen had to take you straight to a magistrate and explain himself to a
[03:25:17.700 --> 03:25:21.700]  magistrate, this wouldn't have happened.
[03:25:25.700 --> 03:25:27.700]  I'm doing it.
[03:25:27.700 --> 03:25:29.700]  Look at that.
[03:25:29.700 --> 03:25:36.700]  Get Gerstein-Pew, G-E-R-S-H-T-I-E-N, P-Pew, P-U-G-H.
[03:25:36.700 --> 03:25:40.700]  That is the seminal case on preliminary hearings.
[03:25:40.700 --> 03:25:43.700]  There's no H in Gerstein.
[03:25:43.700 --> 03:25:45.700]  No H?
[03:25:45.700 --> 03:25:47.700]  They spelled it wrong.
[03:25:52.700 --> 03:25:56.700]  Look in the documents section.
[03:25:56.700 --> 03:26:01.700]  You'll find my lawsuit that I filed against all these judges.
[03:26:02.700 --> 03:26:06.700]  You'll find a dissertation on this issue in there.
[03:26:07.700 --> 03:26:08.700]  Okay.
[03:26:08.700 --> 03:26:11.700]  It explains due process in Texas law.
[03:26:11.700 --> 03:26:15.700]  This due process follows the federal law.
[03:26:15.700 --> 03:26:16.700]  Yeah.
[03:26:16.700 --> 03:26:21.700]  Read that and compare it to what Indiana's doing.
[03:26:21.700 --> 03:26:25.700]  And then come in with some constitutional challenges.
[03:26:25.700 --> 03:26:28.700]  That'll jerk a knot in shorts.
[03:26:29.700 --> 03:26:33.700]  Once you've read Gerstein-Pew, then you'll have a good argument.
[03:26:33.700 --> 03:26:37.700]  If they're not taking people directly to a magistrate,
[03:26:37.700 --> 03:26:41.700]  then they're subject to having all of their prosecutions thrown out.
[03:26:41.700 --> 03:26:46.700]  This will give them a really good reason to make your case go away.
[03:26:46.700 --> 03:26:47.700]  Yeah.
[03:26:47.700 --> 03:26:48.700]  Okay.
[03:26:48.700 --> 03:26:53.700]  Going to our sponsors, Randy Kelton and Brett Fountain of Radio Tech.
[03:27:03.700 --> 03:27:07.700]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come,
[03:27:07.700 --> 03:27:10.700]  and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[03:27:10.700 --> 03:27:14.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[03:27:14.700 --> 03:27:16.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[03:27:16.700 --> 03:27:20.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[03:27:20.700 --> 03:27:25.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:27:25.700 --> 03:27:26.700]  So protect your rights.
[03:27:26.700 --> 03:27:30.700]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[03:27:30.700 --> 03:27:31.700]  Privacy.
[03:27:31.700 --> 03:27:32.700]  It's worth hanging on to.
[03:27:32.700 --> 03:27:35.700]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[03:27:35.700 --> 03:27:39.700]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[03:27:39.700 --> 03:27:42.700]  Start over with StartPage.
[03:27:43.700 --> 03:27:47.700]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power
[03:27:47.700 --> 03:27:50.700]  going into your home too with a smart grid.
[03:27:50.700 --> 03:27:53.700]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters
[03:27:53.700 --> 03:27:57.700]  to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[03:27:58.700 --> 03:28:01.700]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast.
[03:28:01.700 --> 03:28:05.700]  If we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[03:28:05.700 --> 03:28:07.700]  hackers will have a field day.
[03:28:07.700 --> 03:28:11.700]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[03:28:11.700 --> 03:28:13.700]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
[03:28:13.700 --> 03:28:17.700]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[03:28:17.700 --> 03:28:20.700]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[03:28:20.700 --> 03:28:22.700]  There's nothing smart about that.
[03:28:22.700 --> 03:28:25.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com,
[03:28:25.700 --> 03:28:28.700]  the world's most private search engine.
[03:28:30.700 --> 03:28:35.700]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[03:28:35.700 --> 03:28:37.700]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[03:28:37.700 --> 03:28:42.700]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[03:28:42.700 --> 03:28:45.700]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[03:28:45.700 --> 03:28:48.700]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[03:28:48.700 --> 03:28:49.700]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[03:28:49.700 --> 03:28:50.700]  I'm a structural engineer.
[03:28:50.700 --> 03:28:51.700]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[03:28:51.700 --> 03:28:52.700]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[03:28:52.700 --> 03:28:54.700]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[03:28:54.700 --> 03:28:57.700]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[03:28:57.700 --> 03:29:00.700]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[03:29:25.700 --> 03:29:28.700]  The former sheriff's deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[03:29:28.700 --> 03:29:30.700]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[03:29:30.700 --> 03:29:32.700]  that will help you understand what due process is
[03:29:32.700 --> 03:29:34.700]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[03:29:34.700 --> 03:29:37.700]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[03:29:37.700 --> 03:29:40.700]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[03:29:40.700 --> 03:29:42.700]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[03:29:42.700 --> 03:29:44.700]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[03:29:44.700 --> 03:29:47.700]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[03:29:47.700 --> 03:29:50.700]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[03:29:50.700 --> 03:29:52.700]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[03:29:52.700 --> 03:29:53.700]  ruleoflawradio.com.
[03:29:53.700 --> 03:29:56.700]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[03:29:56.700 --> 03:29:58.700]  we all want and deserve.
[03:30:01.700 --> 03:30:03.700]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[03:30:03.700 --> 03:30:06.700]  logosradionetwork.com.
[03:30:23.700 --> 03:30:26.700]  I see tools of ingenuity,
[03:30:26.700 --> 03:30:29.700]  used against the workers of iniquity.
[03:30:29.700 --> 03:30:32.700]  Tools of mass capability,
[03:30:32.700 --> 03:30:35.700]  available for all eternity.
[03:30:35.700 --> 03:30:38.700]  They come from natural divinity,
[03:30:38.700 --> 03:30:41.700]  with steadfast roots in authenticity.
[03:30:41.700 --> 03:30:44.700]  I see tools to regain dignity,
[03:30:44.700 --> 03:30:47.700]  rebuild the crime divinity.
[03:30:47.700 --> 03:30:51.700]  And I say, truth in nature must be
[03:30:51.700 --> 03:30:54.700]  justice, I believe.
[03:30:54.700 --> 03:30:57.700]  Truth in nature must be
[03:30:57.700 --> 03:31:00.700]  justice.
[03:31:00.700 --> 03:31:03.700]  And though it's a daunting task,
[03:31:03.700 --> 03:31:06.700]  at least I got the decency to ask them all
[03:31:06.700 --> 03:31:09.700]  to just take off the silly mask.
[03:31:09.700 --> 03:31:12.700]  And in the light of day, we all will pass.
[03:31:12.700 --> 03:31:15.700]  Okay, we are back, Andy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[03:31:15.700 --> 03:31:18.700]  ruleoflawradio, and we're talking to Rebecca in Indiana.
[03:31:18.700 --> 03:31:21.700]  And Rebecca?
[03:31:21.700 --> 03:31:24.700]  A couple of pieces of research you need to do.
[03:31:24.700 --> 03:31:27.700]  You need to send me an email and ask me for my stuff
[03:31:27.700 --> 03:31:30.700]  on due process.
[03:31:30.700 --> 03:31:33.700]  Okay.
[03:31:33.700 --> 03:31:36.700]  And I'll send you some stuff and then look to convert that
[03:31:36.700 --> 03:31:39.700]  to Indiana law.
[03:31:39.700 --> 03:31:42.700]  You don't ever want to go to the merits.
[03:31:42.700 --> 03:31:45.700]  You want to go to due process first.
[03:31:45.700 --> 03:31:48.700]  So if you claim that, go ahead.
[03:31:48.700 --> 03:31:51.700]  I was looking at the
[03:31:51.700 --> 03:31:54.700]  reading through the rules of criminal procedure
[03:31:54.700 --> 03:31:57.700]  during the break, and
[03:31:57.700 --> 03:32:00.700]  it basically says that when a prosecuting attorney
[03:32:00.700 --> 03:32:03.700]  receives information concerning the commission
[03:32:03.700 --> 03:32:06.700]  of a crime, they act without a grand jury
[03:32:06.700 --> 03:32:09.700]  and apply to a court of criminal jurisdiction
[03:32:09.700 --> 03:32:12.700]  for a subpoena
[03:32:12.700 --> 03:32:15.700]  and this is Peacom ordering a person other than the target
[03:32:15.700 --> 03:32:18.700]  of the criminal investigation to produce their evidence.
[03:32:18.700 --> 03:32:21.700]  What are the
[03:32:21.700 --> 03:32:24.700]  rules for arrest?
[03:32:27.700 --> 03:32:30.700]  This is about arrest. The arrest was improper.
[03:32:30.700 --> 03:32:33.700]  When they arrest you, they have to take you to a magistrate
[03:32:33.700 --> 03:32:36.700]  to get a probable cause to hold you.
[03:32:36.700 --> 03:32:39.700]  I wasn't arrested.
[03:32:39.700 --> 03:32:42.700]  I was released from the scene.
[03:32:42.700 --> 03:32:45.700]  I wasn't given a ticket or a citation or anything.
[03:32:45.700 --> 03:32:48.700]  When they, the first time
[03:32:48.700 --> 03:32:51.700]  you appear before the court, there must be a preliminary hearing.
[03:32:51.700 --> 03:32:54.700]  Whether they arrest you
[03:32:54.700 --> 03:32:57.700]  or send you, give you a notice
[03:32:57.700 --> 03:33:00.700]  to appear. When you appear, first
[03:33:00.700 --> 03:33:03.700]  appearance must be for probable
[03:33:03.700 --> 03:33:06.700]  cause determination.
[03:33:06.700 --> 03:33:09.700]  Yeah, this was just an initial hearing
[03:33:09.700 --> 03:33:12.700]  and they were asking me if I understood what I was being charged with
[03:33:12.700 --> 03:33:15.700]  and what the penalties were and all that and what
[03:33:15.700 --> 03:33:18.700]  my initial plea was.
[03:33:18.700 --> 03:33:21.700]  Did the arresting officer come before the court
[03:33:21.700 --> 03:33:24.700]  and make allegations against you?
[03:33:24.700 --> 03:33:27.700]  No.
[03:33:27.700 --> 03:33:30.700]  He must have prior to this
[03:33:30.700 --> 03:33:33.700]  No, stop, stop, stop.
[03:33:33.700 --> 03:33:36.700]  We know what he actually did. I'm asking you
[03:33:36.700 --> 03:33:39.700]  what he did based on what the law requires.
[03:33:39.700 --> 03:33:42.700]  He has to come there
[03:33:42.700 --> 03:33:45.700]  and you have to have an opportunity to be faced by your
[03:33:45.700 --> 03:33:48.700]  accuser and opportunity to cross examine your accuser
[03:33:48.700 --> 03:33:51.700]  so that somebody just can't make up something,
[03:33:51.700 --> 03:33:54.700]  give it to the court, and the court is stuck accepting it.
[03:33:54.700 --> 03:33:57.700]  They're supposed to bring you and your accuser
[03:33:57.700 --> 03:34:00.700]  before the court.
[03:34:00.700 --> 03:34:03.700]  You state your side, he states his side, and the court decides
[03:34:03.700 --> 03:34:06.700]  whether there's sufficient cause.
[03:34:06.700 --> 03:34:09.700]  That's the preliminary hearing.
[03:34:09.700 --> 03:34:12.700]  Sounds like they're not doing it.
[03:34:12.700 --> 03:34:15.700]  No, they actually have a
[03:34:15.700 --> 03:34:18.700]  a court of criminal jurisdiction
[03:34:18.700 --> 03:34:21.700]  may grant the prosecutor's request with or without modifications
[03:34:21.700 --> 03:34:24.700]  and
[03:34:24.700 --> 03:34:27.700]  the court might order that the person to whom
[03:34:27.700 --> 03:34:30.700]  the subpoena adduces ticum is addressed
[03:34:30.700 --> 03:34:33.700]  No, no, no, no.
[03:34:33.700 --> 03:34:36.700]  Subpoena adduces ticum means
[03:34:36.700 --> 03:34:39.700]  they want you to bring documents.
[03:34:39.700 --> 03:34:42.700]  And in the context you were describing, Rebecca,
[03:34:42.700 --> 03:34:45.700]  that subpoena was directed to
[03:34:45.700 --> 03:34:48.700]  somebody who would have evidence
[03:34:48.700 --> 03:34:51.700]  that you were the criminal.
[03:34:51.700 --> 03:34:54.700]  They need to get somebody to testify against you,
[03:34:54.700 --> 03:34:57.700]  somebody that would swear to certain facts.
[03:34:57.700 --> 03:35:00.700]  You are in the wrong place.
[03:35:00.700 --> 03:35:03.700]  Before the court can accrue jurisdiction,
[03:35:03.700 --> 03:35:06.700]  you must be brought before a magistrate,
[03:35:06.700 --> 03:35:09.700]  not a judge.
[03:35:09.700 --> 03:35:12.700]  Now, the magistrate may be a judge,
[03:35:12.700 --> 03:35:15.700]  but when you're brought before him for this purpose,
[03:35:15.700 --> 03:35:18.700]  he takes off his judge's hat, and now he's a magistrate,
[03:35:18.700 --> 03:35:21.700]  and what he does is to hear both the accusation
[03:35:21.700 --> 03:35:24.700]  and your opposition to the accusation,
[03:35:24.700 --> 03:35:27.700]  and he makes the determination a probable cause.
[03:35:27.700 --> 03:35:30.700]  Well, yeah, they're not doing that here in Indiana, then.
[03:35:30.700 --> 03:35:33.700]  Okay, then get Gerstein,
[03:35:33.700 --> 03:35:36.700]  send me an email, I'll send you some stuff.
[03:35:36.700 --> 03:35:39.700]  You'll find Gerstein Pugh in there.
[03:35:39.700 --> 03:35:42.700]  I'll send you my habeas
[03:35:42.700 --> 03:35:45.700]  that I wrote 30 years ago.
[03:35:45.700 --> 03:35:48.700]  And it goes through all of this,
[03:35:48.700 --> 03:35:51.700]  and some of my case law is Texas,
[03:35:51.700 --> 03:35:54.700]  but most of it's federal case law.
[03:35:54.700 --> 03:35:57.700]  So send me an email, we'll go through that,
[03:35:57.700 --> 03:36:00.700]  and we'll talk next week, and we can talk more intelligently.
[03:36:05.700 --> 03:36:08.700]  Oh, every state is doing it.
[03:36:08.700 --> 03:36:11.700]  Nobody's doing probable cause hearings.
[03:36:11.700 --> 03:36:14.700]  That's why I sued all the highest judges in Texas
[03:36:14.700 --> 03:36:17.700]  for two bucks apiece.
[03:36:17.700 --> 03:36:20.700]  They threw out my case,
[03:36:20.700 --> 03:36:23.700]  but they did add into the judge's bench book
[03:36:23.700 --> 03:36:26.700]  that there must be a probable cause determination.
[03:36:26.700 --> 03:36:29.700]  They're doing a probable cause determination,
[03:36:29.700 --> 03:36:32.700]  but they're not doing it right.
[03:36:32.700 --> 03:36:35.700]  So they used to say they didn't have to do that.
[03:36:35.700 --> 03:36:38.700]  Well, they're not saying that anymore.
[03:36:38.700 --> 03:36:41.700]  Now they have to do that.
[03:36:41.700 --> 03:36:44.700]  The defendant.
[03:36:44.700 --> 03:36:47.700]  And then they have a...
[03:36:50.700 --> 03:36:53.700]  This is where a policeman can't arrest you
[03:36:53.700 --> 03:36:56.700]  and have you prosecuted on his say so.
[03:36:56.700 --> 03:36:59.700]  Right.
[03:36:59.700 --> 03:37:02.700]  There must be a third party intervene
[03:37:02.700 --> 03:37:05.700]  to hear both sides and determine whether or not
[03:37:05.700 --> 03:37:08.700]  you have to stand and answer to the charges.
[03:37:08.700 --> 03:37:11.700]  This is what they're not doing,
[03:37:11.700 --> 03:37:14.700]  and prosecutors pushed things in that direction
[03:37:14.700 --> 03:37:17.700]  so they could force you to take a deal.
[03:37:17.700 --> 03:37:20.700]  It wasn't convenient for prosecutors,
[03:37:20.700 --> 03:37:23.700]  but that's why this was put there.
[03:37:23.700 --> 03:37:26.700]  Our founders 200 years ago understood exactly
[03:37:26.700 --> 03:37:29.700]  what prosecutors do. This is not something new.
[03:37:29.700 --> 03:37:32.700]  Our founders had 3,000 years or 6,000 years
[03:37:32.700 --> 03:37:35.700]  of cultural history,
[03:37:35.700 --> 03:37:38.700]  and they knew how to work,
[03:37:38.700 --> 03:37:41.700]  and they knew the kind of crap people pulled,
[03:37:41.700 --> 03:37:44.700]  and they set us up to eliminate those kind of problems
[03:37:44.700 --> 03:37:47.700]  and prosecutors, because it was convenient for them,
[03:37:47.700 --> 03:37:50.700]  did what prosecutors have always done
[03:37:50.700 --> 03:37:53.700]  and tried to make their jobs easier
[03:37:53.700 --> 03:37:56.700]  by eliminating the rights and privileges
[03:37:56.700 --> 03:37:59.700]  that were written in the constitution.
[03:37:59.700 --> 03:38:02.700]  We need to take them back.
[03:38:02.700 --> 03:38:05.700]  I'm asking you to be a crusader.
[03:38:05.700 --> 03:38:08.700]  I'm asking you to bring issues
[03:38:08.700 --> 03:38:11.700]  that the prosecutor is not going to want to risk
[03:38:11.700 --> 03:38:14.700]  getting before an appellate court
[03:38:14.700 --> 03:38:17.700]  in case he gets a bad ruling,
[03:38:17.700 --> 03:38:20.700]  and then he has to change everything.
[03:38:20.700 --> 03:38:23.700]  So give him a reason to make your charges go away.
[03:38:28.700 --> 03:38:31.700]  Okay, we do need to move on.
[03:38:31.700 --> 03:38:34.700]  All right.
[03:38:34.700 --> 03:38:37.700]  Well, thank you very much for this information.
[03:38:37.700 --> 03:38:40.700]  I'm definitely going to do my homework.
[03:38:40.700 --> 03:38:43.700]  Okay, thank you, Rebecca.
[03:38:43.700 --> 03:38:46.700]  Now we're going to Don in Oklahoma.
[03:38:46.700 --> 03:38:49.700]  Hello, Don. What do you have for us today?
[03:38:49.700 --> 03:38:52.700]  Hi, Randy.
[03:38:52.700 --> 03:38:55.700]  I just want to run something past you. It won't take long.
[03:38:55.700 --> 03:38:58.700]  This is about a private process server
[03:38:58.700 --> 03:39:01.700]  that I didn't know who he was at the time.
[03:39:01.700 --> 03:39:04.700]  Okay, give you a short story.
[03:39:04.700 --> 03:39:07.700]  This guy showed up on my front porch on a Monday,
[03:39:07.700 --> 03:39:10.700]  rang the doorbell, stood there for a long period of time
[03:39:10.700 --> 03:39:13.700]  on a Monday, and then left. Comes back on Tuesday.
[03:39:13.700 --> 03:39:16.700]  He's the same guy. He's wearing a lanyard.
[03:39:16.700 --> 03:39:19.700]  He's got his photo ID on his chest, and he's carrying a clipboard.
[03:39:19.700 --> 03:39:22.700]  The reason I didn't answer the door is I've been here 30 years.
[03:39:22.700 --> 03:39:25.700]  I'm going all over the place.
[03:39:25.700 --> 03:39:28.700]  I get a lot of salespeople here.
[03:39:28.700 --> 03:39:31.700]  One is selling enters and windows and roofs and all this stuff,
[03:39:31.700 --> 03:39:34.700]  so I don't answer the door. Just salesmen all the time.
[03:39:34.700 --> 03:39:37.700]  So anyway, the second day this guy shows up,
[03:39:37.700 --> 03:39:40.700]  rings the doorbell, stands there for a long period of time,
[03:39:40.700 --> 03:39:43.700]  turns around, walks down the driveway, and goes straight to my mailbox.
[03:39:43.700 --> 03:39:46.700]  And he opens my mailbox and starts looking through stuff.
[03:39:46.700 --> 03:39:49.700]  Okay, so he left. I thought, man, that's really strange.
[03:39:49.700 --> 03:39:52.700]  He didn't go to my neighbors. He just went to mine.
[03:39:52.700 --> 03:39:56.700]  The third day on Wednesday, the guy comes back two times,
[03:39:56.700 --> 03:39:59.700]  10 o'clock in the morning, 2.30 in the afternoon.
[03:39:59.700 --> 03:40:02.700]  Same thing. He rings the doorbell, stands there for a long time,
[03:40:02.700 --> 03:40:06.700]  goes down the driveway, goes to the mailbox,
[03:40:06.700 --> 03:40:10.700]  looks through my mail, and walks down the street and gets in his car.
[03:40:10.700 --> 03:40:13.700]  It turned out this guy was a process server I found out a couple weeks later.
[03:40:13.700 --> 03:40:18.700]  I didn't know at the time, and he was trying to serve me.
[03:40:18.700 --> 03:40:24.700]  And so I did a little search online, and from what AI says,
[03:40:24.700 --> 03:40:28.700]  it's contact the Postal Inspector Service and file a report.
[03:40:28.700 --> 03:40:34.700]  But it's also mailbox tampering is illegal under federal law.
[03:40:34.700 --> 03:40:39.700]  Yeah, but did he steal any mail, or did he just look at it?
[03:40:39.700 --> 03:40:42.700]  He just looked at it, but he left a note.
[03:40:42.700 --> 03:40:46.700]  I don't think he's allowed to open it.
[03:40:47.700 --> 03:40:50.700]  But he can look at it to see if your name...
[03:40:50.700 --> 03:40:55.700]  He's looking to see if your name is on the mail to make sure you live here.
[03:40:55.700 --> 03:40:56.700]  Hang on, Randy Kelton.
[03:40:56.700 --> 03:40:57.700]  We need to do that more than once.
[03:40:57.700 --> 03:40:58.700]  We'll be right back.
[03:41:17.700 --> 03:41:22.700]  The Champ Plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[03:41:22.700 --> 03:41:27.700]  that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care,
[03:41:27.700 --> 03:41:31.700]  and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay.
[03:41:31.700 --> 03:41:37.700]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[03:41:37.700 --> 03:41:44.700]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[03:41:44.700 --> 03:41:50.700]  The Champ Plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[03:41:50.700 --> 03:41:58.700]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[03:42:15.700 --> 03:42:20.700]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[03:42:20.700 --> 03:42:24.700]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[03:42:24.700 --> 03:42:29.700]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[03:42:29.700 --> 03:42:35.700]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[03:42:35.700 --> 03:42:40.700]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[03:42:40.700 --> 03:42:44.700]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[03:42:44.700 --> 03:42:50.700]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[03:42:50.700 --> 03:42:53.700]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[03:42:53.700 --> 03:43:02.700]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[03:43:10.700 --> 03:43:12.700]  Thank you.
[03:43:40.700 --> 03:44:01.700]  Okay, we are back into Fountain Wheel of Law Radio, and we talked about this on break.
[03:44:01.700 --> 03:44:09.700]  He looked in the mailbox, and he checked to see if the name on the mail was the name on his subpoena.
[03:44:09.700 --> 03:44:13.700]  Then he comes back, and he looks in the mailbox again.
[03:44:13.700 --> 03:44:20.700]  He wants to see if the mail he looked at the first time has been picked up.
[03:44:20.700 --> 03:44:24.700]  See if you're home, see if somebody's here.
[03:44:24.700 --> 03:44:28.700]  Does that make sense, Don?
[03:44:28.700 --> 03:44:30.700]  Oh, you're still muted.
[03:44:30.700 --> 03:44:34.700]  Only two people are allowed to access your box as the owner and then the mail carrier,
[03:44:34.700 --> 03:44:38.700]  and the only third person is somebody that's authorized.
[03:44:38.700 --> 03:44:40.700]  What says that?
[03:44:40.700 --> 03:44:43.700]  That's what I found on the Internet.
[03:44:43.700 --> 03:44:50.700]  Does it say that nobody can look in it or nobody can access it?
[03:44:50.700 --> 03:44:53.700]  Nobody can take something out of it?
[03:44:53.700 --> 03:44:54.700]  I don't know.
[03:44:54.700 --> 03:44:56.700]  It's been a couple of weeks, I think.
[03:44:56.700 --> 03:44:59.700]  Basically, by just opening the door is enough to consider them accessing it,
[03:44:59.700 --> 03:45:02.700]  which means that it's the federal law.
[03:45:02.700 --> 03:45:05.700]  It's illegal.
[03:45:05.700 --> 03:45:09.700]  I'm going to bet that him being a process server,
[03:45:09.700 --> 03:45:15.700]  that if he's checking the mailbox to ensure that he's at the right place,
[03:45:15.700 --> 03:45:24.700]  courts are going to grant him that, that he has a permissible purpose.
[03:45:24.700 --> 03:45:28.700]  As long as he don't open any of the mail.
[03:45:28.700 --> 03:45:31.700]  From the house, it looked like he was reaching in there and moving stuff around,
[03:45:31.700 --> 03:45:34.700]  like you said, he was moving stuff around so he could see the names on the mail,
[03:45:34.700 --> 03:45:36.700]  just junk mail and all it was.
[03:45:36.700 --> 03:45:39.700]  And then he left a note in there saying he's trying to get a hold of me,
[03:45:39.700 --> 03:45:41.700]  and his name is Rich, and he gave me his phone number,
[03:45:41.700 --> 03:45:43.700]  wanted me to call him, which I never did,
[03:45:43.700 --> 03:45:46.700]  because I thought the guy was a damn window salesman again.
[03:45:46.700 --> 03:45:51.700]  What the guy should have done is got a package,
[03:45:51.700 --> 03:45:56.700]  big box package that came up and knocked on your door.
[03:45:56.700 --> 03:45:59.700]  You went out there and opened it.
[03:45:59.700 --> 03:46:01.700]  It gave you the package.
[03:46:01.700 --> 03:46:06.700]  It's got the subpoena in it.
[03:46:06.700 --> 03:46:10.700]  He just wasn't very slick.
[03:46:10.700 --> 03:46:11.700]  Yeah, well he had his clipboard.
[03:46:11.700 --> 03:46:16.700]  He looked like a salesman or someone taking a survey or something, you know.
[03:46:16.700 --> 03:46:23.700]  If he was smart, he would get a big Christmas package.
[03:46:23.700 --> 03:46:26.700]  Knock on your door.
[03:46:26.700 --> 03:46:31.700]  He lied on the affidavit the other days that he was here.
[03:46:31.700 --> 03:46:37.700]  If he did that, you'd fall for it like a sucker.
[03:46:37.700 --> 03:46:42.700]  Yeah, but if I claim that he lied on his affidavit,
[03:46:42.700 --> 03:46:47.700]  then the court's going to say that I was just avoiding service or something.
[03:46:47.700 --> 03:46:49.700]  Yeah, well, maybe.
[03:46:49.700 --> 03:46:56.700]  Is it against the law to avoid service in Oklahoma?
[03:46:56.700 --> 03:46:58.700]  Well, I searched as I did.
[03:46:58.700 --> 03:47:02.700]  I didn't do this Oklahoma specific, but I did say, you know, you're not,
[03:47:02.700 --> 03:47:04.700]  there's no law saying you have to open your front door.
[03:47:04.700 --> 03:47:07.700]  You know, I don't know about Oklahoma specific.
[03:47:07.700 --> 03:47:11.700]  Well, there is a law in Texas to make it a crime to avoid service.
[03:47:11.700 --> 03:47:15.700]  Right, but you didn't know this guy was serving process.
[03:47:15.700 --> 03:47:18.700]  That would have to be knowingly, willingly, intentionally something.
[03:47:18.700 --> 03:47:20.700]  There has to be some mens rea in there.
[03:47:20.700 --> 03:47:23.700]  They can't just accidentally avoid.
[03:47:23.700 --> 03:47:31.700]  As far as I know, Texas is the only one that makes it a crime to avoid service.
[03:47:31.700 --> 03:47:34.700]  So it probably isn't a crime.
[03:47:34.700 --> 03:47:42.700]  However, the process server, I know he can pass a no trespassing sign
[03:47:42.700 --> 03:47:44.700]  if he's serving process.
[03:47:44.700 --> 03:47:45.700]  So John, I'm curious.
[03:47:45.700 --> 03:47:48.700]  Why don't you just call the guy and tell him, hey, I thought you were
[03:47:48.700 --> 03:47:49.700]  a window salesman.
[03:47:49.700 --> 03:47:53.700]  Bring me the whatever you got to bring me.
[03:47:53.700 --> 03:47:58.700]  Or are you trying to avoid service?
[03:47:58.700 --> 03:48:04.700]  Well, yeah, I admit I was avoiding service, but it still goes, you know,
[03:48:04.700 --> 03:48:07.700]  the no law saying I have to open my door.
[03:48:07.700 --> 03:48:08.700]  It's what I'm saying.
[03:48:08.700 --> 03:48:16.700]  If it's not against the law in Oklahoma, then by all means avoid service.
[03:48:16.700 --> 03:48:19.700]  OK, well, of course, if I argue and if I try to point out to the courts that
[03:48:19.700 --> 03:48:23.700]  he lied on it the days that he was here, also said that he beat on the door
[03:48:23.700 --> 03:48:24.700]  and he listened for movement stuff.
[03:48:24.700 --> 03:48:25.700]  The guy didn't.
[03:48:25.700 --> 03:48:26.700]  He lied.
[03:48:26.700 --> 03:48:28.700]  He rang the doorbell once and just stood there forever.
[03:48:28.700 --> 03:48:32.700]  And he went down the driveway straight to the mailbox and started looking at
[03:48:32.700 --> 03:48:35.700]  my mailbox, which I thought that was illegal.
[03:48:35.700 --> 03:48:36.700]  I've never seen that happen before.
[03:48:36.700 --> 03:48:37.700]  I thought that was really strange.
[03:48:37.700 --> 03:48:42.700]  I looked it up and I called and I got a service number for the Postal
[03:48:42.700 --> 03:48:45.700]  Inspector Service, but I have not submitted the forms yet.
[03:48:45.700 --> 03:48:49.700]  I didn't know if I did that, if that would help, if I submit that into this
[03:48:49.700 --> 03:48:52.700]  case once I acknowledge I still haven't been served.
[03:48:52.700 --> 03:48:53.700]  I haven't.
[03:48:53.700 --> 03:48:56.700]  They're doing the service by publication.
[03:48:56.700 --> 03:48:57.700]  So I haven't.
[03:48:57.700 --> 03:48:58.700]  They have not heard.
[03:48:58.700 --> 03:49:02.700]  I haven't told the end of the month to answer back to them.
[03:49:02.700 --> 03:49:07.700]  I was wondering if I have a chance of between false information being in
[03:49:07.700 --> 03:49:08.700]  public records now.
[03:49:08.700 --> 03:49:14.700]  And then this guy, he has low business ethics that I because I'm going to
[03:49:14.700 --> 03:49:18.700]  turn him into the Postal Inspector Service and it is a federal law.
[03:49:18.700 --> 03:49:22.700]  And so I would say, well, I know it's a long shot, but what gives her any
[03:49:22.700 --> 03:49:23.700]  chance?
[03:49:23.700 --> 03:49:25.700]  I could get the judge to just dismiss the case.
[03:49:25.700 --> 03:49:28.700]  I would say somewhere between little and none.
[03:49:28.700 --> 03:49:29.700]  Yeah.
[03:49:29.700 --> 03:49:30.700]  Yeah.
[03:49:32.700 --> 03:49:34.700]  I wouldn't even bring it up.
[03:49:34.700 --> 03:49:35.700]  Yeah.
[03:49:35.700 --> 03:49:36.700]  He lied.
[03:49:36.700 --> 03:49:37.700]  So what?
[03:49:37.700 --> 03:49:39.700]  That doesn't affect anything about your case.
[03:49:39.700 --> 03:49:40.700]  Yeah.
[03:49:40.700 --> 03:49:49.700]  I thought I'd have a shot, but okay, we got a couple more callers.
[03:49:49.700 --> 03:49:52.700]  We may have time to get in one more.
[03:49:52.700 --> 03:49:55.700]  You have anything else for us, Don?
[03:49:55.700 --> 03:49:56.700]  Okay.
[03:49:56.700 --> 03:50:00.700]  Well, you know, if this guy, he did do stuff wrong as far as accessing a
[03:50:00.700 --> 03:50:02.700]  mailbox and it is a federal law that he broke.
[03:50:02.700 --> 03:50:06.700]  Is that a, can a bar agree the lawyers that hired him?
[03:50:06.700 --> 03:50:07.700]  Yes.
[03:50:07.700 --> 03:50:12.700]  You can bar agree the lawyers that hired him just for yucks.
[03:50:12.700 --> 03:50:17.700]  Would that be a valid, can I, do I claim that they hired somebody with low
[03:50:17.700 --> 03:50:19.700]  business ethics or how?
[03:50:19.700 --> 03:50:20.700]  Yeah.
[03:50:20.700 --> 03:50:22.700]  You can claim anything you want to.
[03:50:22.700 --> 03:50:23.700]  It doesn't matter what you file.
[03:50:23.700 --> 03:50:25.700]  The bar is going to throw it out.
[03:50:25.700 --> 03:50:26.700]  Oh, okay.
[03:50:26.700 --> 03:50:28.700]  But the insurance company's not.
[03:50:28.700 --> 03:50:31.700]  They'll sting their insurance anyway.
[03:50:31.700 --> 03:50:33.700]  That's the only reason we filed it.
[03:50:33.700 --> 03:50:34.700]  It don't matter what you file.
[03:50:34.700 --> 03:50:36.700]  It doesn't matter if it's valid or not.
[03:50:36.700 --> 03:50:39.700]  The bar is going to toss it.
[03:50:39.700 --> 03:50:44.700]  So the insurance company, they'll sting the lawyer.
[03:50:44.700 --> 03:50:45.700]  Okay.
[03:50:45.700 --> 03:50:46.700]  Well, appreciate it.
[03:50:46.700 --> 03:50:49.700]  I thought mailbox tampering, it appeared to be a big thing on the internet.
[03:50:49.700 --> 03:50:52.700]  So I thought that, you know, I had you saying.
[03:50:52.700 --> 03:50:57.700]  If, if he, if he didn't take any mail out of the, the mailbox, if he didn't
[03:50:57.700 --> 03:51:02.700]  open any mail, then no harm, no foul.
[03:51:02.700 --> 03:51:06.700]  No, he just snooped in at three days in a row and then left me a note, asked me
[03:51:06.700 --> 03:51:07.700]  to call him, which.
[03:51:07.700 --> 03:51:08.700]  Yeah.
[03:51:08.700 --> 03:51:10.700]  But you know, they're going to say he's a process server.
[03:51:10.700 --> 03:51:15.700]  He has a permissible purpose.
[03:51:15.700 --> 03:51:16.700]  Okay.
[03:51:16.700 --> 03:51:19.700]  Well, I thought, I thought I had something, but it was worth asking, I guess.
[03:51:19.700 --> 03:51:20.700]  Yeah.
[03:51:20.700 --> 03:51:21.700]  Worth asking.
[03:51:21.700 --> 03:51:22.700]  Okay.
[03:51:22.700 --> 03:51:23.700]  Thank you, Don.
[03:51:23.700 --> 03:51:24.700]  Okay.
[03:51:24.700 --> 03:51:26.700]  Now we're going to go to Catherine in California.
[03:51:26.700 --> 03:51:28.700]  Ted, I see you there.
[03:51:28.700 --> 03:51:33.700]  I don't think we're going to get to you, but I do want to talk to you.
[03:51:33.700 --> 03:51:34.700]  Call me tomorrow.
[03:51:34.700 --> 03:51:37.700]  I got somebody I want to send to you.
[03:51:37.700 --> 03:51:38.700]  Okay.
[03:51:38.700 --> 03:51:39.700]  Okay.
[03:51:39.700 --> 03:51:42.700]  Ted, I got you unmuted.
[03:51:42.700 --> 03:51:43.700]  Roger.
[03:51:43.700 --> 03:51:46.700]  Have a good night.
[03:51:46.700 --> 03:51:47.700]  Okay.
[03:51:47.700 --> 03:51:48.700]  Thank you, Ted.
[03:51:48.700 --> 03:51:49.700]  Okay.
[03:51:49.700 --> 03:51:50.700]  Catherine, are you there?
[03:51:50.700 --> 03:51:51.700]  Yes, sir.
[03:51:51.700 --> 03:51:52.700]  Good.
[03:51:52.700 --> 03:51:53.700]  Good evening.
[03:51:53.700 --> 03:51:54.700]  Can you hear me?
[03:51:54.700 --> 03:51:56.700]  Yes, we can.
[03:51:56.700 --> 03:51:58.700]  Oh, great.
[03:51:58.700 --> 03:52:01.700]  Happy holidays to everybody.
[03:52:01.700 --> 03:52:02.700]  Humbug, humbug.
[03:52:02.700 --> 03:52:07.700]  Ah, humbug.
[03:52:07.700 --> 03:52:11.700]  I've already posted my question and your group, the law society.
[03:52:11.700 --> 03:52:19.700]  I understand not everybody can read it, but my question was about a district court judge.
[03:52:20.700 --> 03:52:27.700]  Because in a nutshell, I'm dealing with public corruption, so I filed last February a petition
[03:52:27.700 --> 03:52:34.700]  from district federal court for an injunction having to do with a state superior court case.
[03:52:34.700 --> 03:52:44.700]  And so the district federal court assigned to my petition a judge who works in the same
[03:52:45.700 --> 03:52:51.700]  court that I'm fighting against, and actually they're a real party in interest.
[03:52:51.700 --> 03:52:58.700]  So I found out today I was watching a YouTube video where the same judge's name is Simmons,
[03:52:58.700 --> 03:53:00.700]  James Edward Simmons.
[03:53:00.700 --> 03:53:07.700]  So Biden appointed him or nominated him to be a district court judge.
[03:53:07.700 --> 03:53:13.700]  And they were questioning a bunch of judges today in this YouTube video, which I also
[03:53:13.700 --> 03:53:16.700]  posted on in the law society.
[03:53:16.700 --> 03:53:23.700]  And so I was really surprised because this judge, appointee, was claiming that he had
[03:53:23.700 --> 03:53:26.700]  never heard any district court cases.
[03:53:26.700 --> 03:53:33.700]  So when I filed my petition, I tried to recuse him when I found out he worked for the superior
[03:53:33.700 --> 03:53:40.700]  court, and he falsely claimed that I had already had, he had already ruled on something.
[03:53:40.700 --> 03:53:46.700]  So if you try to recuse a judge and they've already ruled in a case, you can't do that.
[03:53:46.700 --> 03:53:49.700]  So he claimed he'd already ruled when he had not.
[03:53:49.700 --> 03:53:57.700]  And he dismissed my case, which was a civil rights petition on the grounds of diversity
[03:53:57.700 --> 03:53:58.700]  jurisdiction.
[03:53:58.700 --> 03:54:01.700]  And there's only two ways to get in federal court.
[03:54:01.700 --> 03:54:05.700]  And one of the ways, civil rights, the other is diversity.
[03:54:05.700 --> 03:54:13.700]  And what that means is you're suing or petitioning against multiple parties in different states.
[03:54:13.700 --> 03:54:21.700]  So it was shocking that he dismissed my case as a moot on diversity when it was a civil
[03:54:21.700 --> 03:54:22.700]  rights case.
[03:54:22.700 --> 03:54:30.700]  So I appealed it and the appellate court ruled that my appeal was frivolous, but I'm kept
[03:54:30.700 --> 03:54:33.700]  really busy intentionally, I suspect.
[03:54:33.700 --> 03:54:40.700]  So I wasn't even able to respond to that, to file in response to an order to show cause
[03:54:40.700 --> 03:54:43.700]  why my appeal wasn't frivolous.
[03:54:43.700 --> 03:54:50.700]  And I understand that a lot of pro se litigants, that's the appellate court's response to
[03:54:50.700 --> 03:54:53.700]  their appeal, it's frivolous.
[03:54:53.700 --> 03:55:02.700]  But in any event, my question was, I was watching this video today where Congress, especially
[03:55:02.700 --> 03:55:11.700]  Judge or Senator Kennedy was questioning this judge that I was dealing with on his fitness
[03:55:11.700 --> 03:55:13.700]  to be a district court judge.
[03:55:13.700 --> 03:55:17.700]  And he didn't even know what the map versus Ohio case was about.
[03:55:17.700 --> 03:55:24.700]  And what that case is about is if prosecutors gather evidence unlawfully, like they break
[03:55:24.700 --> 03:55:30.700]  in your house, or they don't go through the proper procedure, they can't use that evidence
[03:55:30.700 --> 03:55:31.700]  against you.
[03:55:31.700 --> 03:55:36.700]  So this judge didn't even know what map versus Ohio was about.
[03:55:36.700 --> 03:55:42.700]  And so the judge was claiming he's never written an opinion, a brief.
[03:55:42.700 --> 03:55:44.700]  Hold on, hold on.
[03:55:44.700 --> 03:55:45.700]  We're out of time.
[03:55:45.700 --> 03:55:49.700]  We never got to your question.
[03:55:49.700 --> 03:55:55.700]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[03:55:55.700 --> 03:55:56.700]  Recovery Version.
[03:55:56.700 --> 03:56:01.700]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[03:56:01.700 --> 03:56:06.700]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[03:56:06.700 --> 03:56:09.700]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[03:56:09.700 --> 03:56:18.700]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[03:56:18.700 --> 03:56:24.700]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[03:56:24.700 --> 03:56:28.700]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[03:56:28.700 --> 03:56:31.700]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[03:56:31.700 --> 03:56:39.700]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[03:56:39.700 --> 03:56:47.700]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[03:56:48.700 --> 03:56:51.700]  Looking for some truth?
[03:56:51.700 --> 03:56:53.700]  You found it.
[03:56:53.700 --> 03:56:55.700]  LogosradioNetwork.com.
[03:57:03.700 --> 03:57:08.700]  The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of Judaism, Islam and Christianity.
[03:57:08.700 --> 03:57:12.700]  If you're an educated person, you should probably know them, regardless of your religion.
[03:57:12.700 --> 03:57:16.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with a tip to help you remember one of
[03:57:16.700 --> 03:57:18.700]  the Ten Commandments.
[03:57:18.700 --> 03:57:20.700]  Privacy is under attack.
[03:57:20.700 --> 03:57:23.700]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[03:57:23.700 --> 03:57:28.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:57:28.700 --> 03:57:30.700]  So protect your rights.
[03:57:30.700 --> 03:57:33.700]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[03:57:33.700 --> 03:57:36.700]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[03:57:36.700 --> 03:57:41.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine
[03:57:41.700 --> 03:57:43.700]  alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[03:57:43.700 --> 03:57:46.700]  Start over with Startpage.
[03:57:46.700 --> 03:57:52.700]  Commandment number one says, one god only, thou shalt have no other gods before me.
[03:57:52.700 --> 03:57:57.700]  The idea of only one god was revolutionary back when Moses delivered that commandment.
[03:57:57.700 --> 03:58:02.700]  Monotheism or the worship of a single supreme god was certainly not the norm among the peoples
[03:58:02.700 --> 03:58:03.700]  of the Middle East.
[03:58:03.700 --> 03:58:08.700]  Many religions at that time worshipped multiple gods and the idea of one god set the Jews apart.
[03:58:08.700 --> 03:58:11.700]  It's a cornerstone of Islam and Christianity as well.
[03:58:11.700 --> 03:58:15.700]  Of all the world's moral codes, the Ten Commandments have probably inspired more commitment
[03:58:15.700 --> 03:58:17.700]  and controversy than any other.
[03:58:17.700 --> 03:58:21.700]  The next time they come up in conversation, you'll be prepared by knowing that
[03:58:21.700 --> 03:58:24.700]  commandment number one says only one god.
[03:58:24.700 --> 03:58:29.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:58:35.700 --> 03:58:39.700]  The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of Judaism, Islam and Christianity.
[03:58:39.700 --> 03:58:43.700]  If you're an educated person, you should probably know them, regardless of your religion.
[03:58:43.700 --> 03:58:48.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with a tip to help you remember one of the Ten Commandments.
[03:58:48.700 --> 03:58:54.700]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[03:58:54.700 --> 03:58:59.700]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[03:58:59.700 --> 03:59:04.700]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[03:59:04.700 --> 03:59:07.700]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[03:59:07.700 --> 03:59:10.700]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[03:59:10.700 --> 03:59:14.700]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[03:59:14.700 --> 03:59:17.700]  Start over with StartPage.
[03:59:17.700 --> 03:59:22.700]  Commandment number two says don't make images of things God has made and don't worship them.
[03:59:22.700 --> 03:59:27.700]  Thou shalt not make any graven image or likeness of anything in heaven, on earth or in the water.
[03:59:27.700 --> 03:59:30.700]  Thou shalt not bow down to them nor serve them.
[03:59:30.700 --> 03:59:34.700]  In other words, don't make a duplicate or two of anything made by God.
[03:59:34.700 --> 03:59:38.700]  Back when Moses delivered that commandment, idol worship was rampant.
[03:59:38.700 --> 03:59:43.700]  Many cultures built statues of gods and even sacrificed their children to them.
[03:59:43.700 --> 03:59:48.700]  Moses' own followers built a golden calf to worship, but the second commandment forbids that.
[03:59:48.700 --> 03:59:53.700]  Commandment number two, don't make two of anything God has already made and worship God alone.
[03:59:53.700 --> 03:59:58.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:00:04.700 --> 04:00:09.700]  Thank you for watching.
[04:00:35.700 --> 04:00:38.700]  Under the crashing waves
[04:00:38.700 --> 04:00:41.700]  To step out of my comfort zone
[04:00:41.700 --> 04:00:44.700]  Into the realm of the unknown
[04:00:44.700 --> 04:00:47.700]  Where Jesus is
[04:00:47.700 --> 04:00:50.700]  And is holding out his hand
[04:00:50.700 --> 04:00:53.700]  But the waves are calling out my name
[04:00:53.700 --> 04:00:56.700]  And they laugh at me
[04:00:56.700 --> 04:00:59.700]  Reminding me of all the times
[04:00:59.700 --> 04:01:02.700]  Tried before and failed
[04:01:02.700 --> 04:01:05.700]  The waves they keep on telling me
[04:01:05.700 --> 04:01:08.700]  Time and time again, boy
[04:01:08.700 --> 04:01:11.700]  You'll never win
[04:01:11.700 --> 04:01:14.700]  You'll never win
[04:01:15.700 --> 04:01:18.700]  But the voice of truth
[04:01:18.700 --> 04:01:21.700]  Tells me a different story
[04:01:21.700 --> 04:01:24.700]  The voice of truth
[04:01:24.700 --> 04:01:27.700]  Says do not be afraid
[04:01:27.700 --> 04:01:30.700]  And the voice of truth
[04:01:30.700 --> 04:01:33.700]  Is for my glory
[04:01:33.700 --> 04:01:37.700]  Out of all the voices calling out to me
[04:01:37.700 --> 04:01:40.700]  I will choose to listen
[04:01:40.700 --> 04:01:47.700]  Good evening everyone and welcome to scripture talk on this December 4th, 2024.
[04:01:47.700 --> 04:01:53.700]  I'm Nana and for the next two hours we'll be hosting an online interactive study of God's word.
[04:01:53.700 --> 04:01:57.700]  And our goals for the study are in accord with Matthew 516.
[04:01:57.700 --> 04:02:00.700]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your glory.