ROL_2024-12-05_16k.timecode

Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:27.920]  Bad Boys by Ella
[00:30.000 --> 00:32.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:34.000 --> 00:35.000]  Whatcha gonna do?
[00:35.000 --> 00:37.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:37.000 --> 00:40.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits
[00:40.000 --> 00:43.000]  You go to school and learn the golden rule
[00:43.000 --> 00:46.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[00:46.000 --> 00:48.000]  If you get hot then you must get cool
[00:48.000 --> 00:50.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:50.000 --> 00:51.000]  Whatcha gonna do?
[00:51.000 --> 00:53.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:53.000 --> 00:55.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[00:55.000 --> 00:56.000]  Whatcha gonna do?
[00:56.000 --> 00:59.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[00:59.000 --> 01:01.000]  You chuck it on that one
[01:01.000 --> 01:02.000]  You chuck it on this one
[01:02.000 --> 01:03.000]  You chuck it on your mother
[01:03.000 --> 01:05.000]  And you chuck it on your father
[01:05.000 --> 01:06.000]  You chuck it on your brother
[01:06.000 --> 01:08.000]  And you chuck it on your sister
[01:08.000 --> 01:09.000]  You chuck it on that one
[01:09.000 --> 01:10.000]  And you chuck it on me
[01:10.000 --> 01:12.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[01:12.000 --> 01:13.000]  Whatcha gonna do?
[01:13.000 --> 01:16.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[01:16.000 --> 01:17.000]  Bad boys, bad boys
[01:17.000 --> 01:19.000]  Okay, howdy, howdy
[01:19.000 --> 01:22.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:22.000 --> 01:28.000]  On this Thursday, the fifth day of December, 2024
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.000]  And it looks like we have a caller already
[01:32.000 --> 01:33.000]  How about that?
[01:33.000 --> 01:36.000]  I didn't even know the phone lines were on
[01:36.000 --> 01:39.000]  It looks like a first time caller
[01:39.000 --> 01:43.000]  But first I got a little bit of a story to tell
[01:43.000 --> 01:49.000]  I've been doing this show for 17 years
[01:49.000 --> 01:57.000]  Been trying to sort out this problem for nigh on to 40 years
[01:57.000 --> 02:00.000]  And I think I got it
[02:00.000 --> 02:04.000]  I think I got how to fix the system
[02:04.000 --> 02:07.000]  I got a ticket in Rome, Texas
[02:07.000 --> 02:13.000]  And I went to a hearing and told the judge
[02:13.000 --> 02:17.000]  They got the cameras going, everything set up
[02:17.000 --> 02:20.000]  I said I have some business for this court
[02:20.000 --> 02:23.000]  To supersede any business now for the court
[02:23.000 --> 02:25.000]  Well, what is that, Mr. Kelton?
[02:25.000 --> 02:28.000]  I said I handed him two criminal complaints
[02:28.000 --> 02:30.000]  One against the sheriff
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  And one against the justice of the peace in Decatur, Texas
[02:35.000 --> 02:38.000]  And he read them on to the record and said
[02:38.000 --> 02:42.000]  Mr. Kelton, what do you want me to do with these?
[02:42.000 --> 02:47.000]  I want you to do exactly what 15.09 commands you to do
[02:47.000 --> 02:50.000]  Which of course he was so familiar with
[02:50.000 --> 02:52.000]  Because he reads that, right?
[02:52.000 --> 02:55.000]  I happened to have it quoted in the complaint itself
[02:55.000 --> 02:57.000]  That was nice of you
[02:57.000 --> 03:01.000]  I accused the justice of the peace in Decatur
[03:01.000 --> 03:05.000]  Of not issuing a warrant under 15.09
[03:05.000 --> 03:09.000]  And that's the criminal charge I was bringing against her
[03:09.000 --> 03:15.000]  So I was hoping he would recognize the irony in the situation
[03:15.000 --> 03:18.000]  Because I'm asking him to do
[03:18.000 --> 03:22.000]  What I'm filing criminal charges with him
[03:22.000 --> 03:25.000]  Against some other judge for not doing
[03:25.000 --> 03:28.000]  And he refused, so I asked the bailiff to arrest him
[03:28.000 --> 03:30.000]  And the bailiff refused
[03:30.000 --> 03:32.000]  I've talked about this on the air before
[03:32.000 --> 03:39.000]  So I decided to sue him in the small claims court
[03:39.000 --> 03:43.000]  That only cost like 55 bucks
[03:43.000 --> 03:46.000]  So you want to talk about why the small claims court?
[03:46.000 --> 03:48.000]  Why there?
[03:48.000 --> 03:51.000]  It's only 50 bucks
[03:51.000 --> 03:53.000]  And it's easy
[03:53.000 --> 03:56.000]  And I sued him for 19,000
[03:56.000 --> 04:01.000]  The max you can sue for in Texas in small claims is 20
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000]  So I wanted to leave room for the stores doctrine
[04:05.000 --> 04:07.000]  For them to come and make a deal
[04:07.000 --> 04:13.000]  So I go and file that with the local JP
[04:13.000 --> 04:15.000]  And Mandy Hayes comes out
[04:15.000 --> 04:19.000]  Mandy Hayes is absolutely a sweetheart
[04:19.000 --> 04:23.000]  Everybody likes Mandy Hayes
[04:23.000 --> 04:27.000]  And I told her, I did not want this to be you
[04:27.000 --> 04:31.000]  But she's precinct 3
[04:31.000 --> 04:36.000]  My son-in-law is the justice of the peace in precinct 4
[04:36.000 --> 04:41.000]  And he's good friends with the justice of the peace in precinct 2
[04:41.000 --> 04:43.000]  And he told me if I messed with her
[04:43.000 --> 04:47.000]  That he'd never speak to me again as long as I lived
[04:47.000 --> 04:50.000]  So I couldn't do her
[04:50.000 --> 04:55.000]  And I'm filing criminal charges against precinct 1
[04:55.000 --> 05:01.000]  So Mandy threw the short straw
[05:01.000 --> 05:08.000]  I have never seen a judge so much on their tippy toes
[05:08.000 --> 05:11.000]  She's got my criminal complaints in her hand
[05:11.000 --> 05:14.000]  And she recognized them
[05:14.000 --> 05:17.000]  Because I had given those to her once before
[05:17.000 --> 05:22.000]  And demanded that she issue warrants and she refused
[05:22.000 --> 05:24.000]  So I took them to the municipal court
[05:24.000 --> 05:27.000]  Filed them with them and he refused
[05:27.000 --> 05:30.000]  Now I come back to her court
[05:30.000 --> 05:34.000]  And I'm suing the municipal judge of Rome
[05:34.000 --> 05:36.000]  In her court
[05:36.000 --> 05:42.000]  For refusing to issue warrants on the same complaints
[05:42.000 --> 05:45.000]  That she refused to issue warrants on
[05:45.000 --> 05:50.000]  Oh my goodness
[05:50.000 --> 05:54.000]  She said, Mr. Kelton, she's holding the complaints
[05:54.000 --> 05:56.000]  What do you want me to do with these?
[05:56.000 --> 06:02.000]  I want you to do precisely what the law commands you to do
[06:02.000 --> 06:06.000]  Oh, Mr. Kelton, I'm not going to issue warrants
[06:06.000 --> 06:11.000]  Well, Your Honor, life is filled with little decisions
[06:11.000 --> 06:14.000]  You all get to make some
[06:14.000 --> 06:16.000]  Turn
[06:16.000 --> 06:19.000]  And she said, well
[06:19.000 --> 06:26.000]  She asked me, how can you justify $19,000 in damages?
[06:26.000 --> 06:28.000]  I said, I don't need to
[06:28.000 --> 06:31.000]  All I have to do is convince the jury
[06:31.000 --> 06:37.000]  And she said, did you request a jury? Not yet
[06:37.000 --> 06:40.000]  I want to see how this shakes out first
[06:40.000 --> 06:42.000]  So she went back in her office
[06:42.000 --> 06:45.000]  Before she got to the door, she stopped and said
[06:45.000 --> 06:48.000]  I know what I'm going to do
[06:48.000 --> 06:51.000]  I'm going to call Judge Garrett
[06:51.000 --> 06:52.000]  That's my son-in-law
[06:52.000 --> 06:54.000]  Boy, wait, don't do that
[06:54.000 --> 06:56.000]  You'll get me in trouble
[06:56.000 --> 07:00.000]  She laughed and went back in her office
[07:00.000 --> 07:03.000]  She made a joke
[07:03.000 --> 07:08.000]  After I told her that I should have brought you a dime
[07:08.000 --> 07:12.000]  I brought Greg Lowry one once when he was a district attorney
[07:12.000 --> 07:16.000]  Since I'm going to put you on one, the least I can do is bring it
[07:16.000 --> 07:20.000]  And I'm really putting her on the dime
[07:20.000 --> 07:24.000]  And she is tippy-toeing around
[07:25.000 --> 07:30.000]  I don't get any huffing and puffing or bad attitude at all
[07:30.000 --> 07:32.000]  She even makes a joke
[07:32.000 --> 07:34.000]  She even makes a joke
[07:34.000 --> 07:37.000]  She was really on her tippy-toes
[07:37.000 --> 07:42.000]  I think this is how we can fix this system
[07:42.000 --> 07:45.000]  I'm going to go to Victoria, Texas
[07:45.000 --> 07:48.000]  I'm going to go to a Justice of the Peace there
[07:48.000 --> 07:53.000]  Dr. Joe, they arrested him and stole his airplane
[07:54.000 --> 08:00.000]  I'm going to go to the Justice of the Peace that issued the arrest warrant for Dr. Joe
[08:00.000 --> 08:07.000]  And I'm going to give him criminal complaints against the police officer who served that warrant
[08:07.000 --> 08:12.000]  Because he issued a warrant to arrest Dr. Joe
[08:12.000 --> 08:18.000]  But he did not issue a warrant to seize anything
[08:18.000 --> 08:24.000]  And he seized his airplane that he wasn't using at the time
[08:24.000 --> 08:30.000]  It was on the other side of the airport at a fixed-base operator over there
[08:30.000 --> 08:33.000]  And he had a pilot there who was flying the airplane
[08:33.000 --> 08:37.000]  He wouldn't let the pilot fly the airplane out
[08:37.000 --> 08:43.000]  And then the case finally gets dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
[08:43.000 --> 08:47.000]  And the airplane's gone
[08:47.000 --> 08:51.000]  So we want the airplane back
[08:51.000 --> 08:56.000]  So since there was no warrant to seize
[08:56.000 --> 09:01.000]  And he was arrested for a third-degree felony
[09:01.000 --> 09:06.000]  And you cannot seize anything under a third-degree felony
[09:06.000 --> 09:09.000]  Or at least under this statute
[09:09.000 --> 09:11.000]  It would have had to...
[09:11.000 --> 09:17.000]  There's only certain charges under which you can seize without a warrant
[09:17.000 --> 09:19.000]  And those are drug charges
[09:19.000 --> 09:24.000]  That one would have to be one more level more severe, right?
[09:24.000 --> 09:28.000]  In this case, it would have had to have been a second-degree felony
[09:28.000 --> 09:30.000]  But they charged him with a third
[09:30.000 --> 09:32.000]  And he seized the airplane
[09:32.000 --> 09:37.000]  Well, I sent an information request to the city of Victoria
[09:37.000 --> 09:42.000]  To get the evidence, the documentation
[09:42.000 --> 09:49.000]  Where the airplane had been put into property for the city of Victoria
[09:49.000 --> 09:53.000]  I'm sure they jumped right on that record request and got it right to you
[09:53.000 --> 09:56.000]  Yeah, they sent a request to the attorney general
[09:56.000 --> 10:03.000]  The attorney general sent them the most cryptic response ever
[10:03.000 --> 10:06.000]  And I never got those records
[10:06.000 --> 10:11.000]  So I'm going to assume that they don't have them
[10:11.000 --> 10:16.000]  So I'm assuming that they stole it
[10:16.000 --> 10:22.000]  That James Poe, he was the police officer who did the arrest
[10:22.000 --> 10:27.000]  Acting in concert and collusion with about ten other officers
[10:27.000 --> 10:35.000]  Stole this airplane, stole some computers and several thousand dollars in cash
[10:35.000 --> 10:40.000]  And never got it back
[10:40.000 --> 10:42.000]  The airplane's gone
[10:42.000 --> 10:47.000]  That's a $76,000 airplane that rents for 200 bucks an hour
[10:47.000 --> 10:52.000]  They got it in 2014, they've had it ten years
[10:52.000 --> 10:58.000]  At 200 bucks an hour, if he rented it five hours a week
[10:58.000 --> 11:02.000]  I forgot what the number was, it was a pretty big number
[11:02.000 --> 11:08.000]  So I'm going to file criminal charges with Justice of the Peace
[11:08.000 --> 11:14.000]  Against James Poe, accusing him of stealing the airplane
[11:14.000 --> 11:18.000]  This is the JP who issued the warrant, so he'll know for certain
[11:18.000 --> 11:23.000]  That there was no warrant authorizing him to seize
[11:25.000 --> 11:29.000]  Now I should take this JP a dime
[11:29.000 --> 11:35.000]  Because I've talked on this show about the first time I brought him criminal complaints
[11:35.000 --> 11:42.000]  And he said that since I wasn't an attorney, he wasn't even going to read them
[11:42.000 --> 11:46.000]  Then I sued him in the county court
[11:46.000 --> 11:50.000]  This time I won't sue him in the county court
[11:50.000 --> 11:57.000]  This time when he refuses to issue a warrant, I'll go to the next JP
[11:57.000 --> 12:04.000]  And sue him immediately in the small claims court, $15,000
[12:04.000 --> 12:07.000]  In his personal capacity
[12:07.000 --> 12:10.000]  How's that work for you, Bubba?
[12:10.000 --> 12:15.000]  And I'm going to start doing this
[12:15.000 --> 12:20.000]  I took the suit and took my name off of it and all my information
[12:20.000 --> 12:23.000]  And put blank lines where that should have been
[12:23.000 --> 12:29.000]  And then went in and filled it in with a pen, a hand
[12:29.000 --> 12:34.000]  So that the document would look like a template
[12:34.000 --> 12:38.000]  Which in fact it is
[12:38.000 --> 12:44.000]  And anybody who wants it, send me an email, I'll send you a copy of it
[12:44.000 --> 12:49.000]  Just take a criminal complaint to the magistrate against a public official
[12:49.000 --> 12:54.000]  Ask him to arrest a public official, issue a warrant
[12:54.000 --> 12:58.000]  When he says he's not going to issue a warrant, go to the next JP
[12:58.000 --> 13:00.000]  I'll sue against him
[13:00.000 --> 13:04.000]  Well, technically, even though it says he has to issue a warrant
[13:04.000 --> 13:07.000]  There's a provision right above that that says that
[13:07.000 --> 13:10.000]  In any situation where he could issue a warrant
[13:10.000 --> 13:12.000]  He's authorized to do that
[13:12.000 --> 13:16.000]  He also could opt to issue a summons instead
[13:16.000 --> 13:17.000]  Exactly
[13:17.000 --> 13:20.000]  So he's not necessarily a criminal just for not issuing the warrant
[13:20.000 --> 13:23.000]  But if he decides to do nothing, well, bang, he's a criminal
[13:23.000 --> 13:28.000]  But they always say to me that they're not going to issue a warrant
[13:28.000 --> 13:31.000]  So he tells me he's not going to issue a warrant
[13:31.000 --> 13:33.000]  That's enough
[13:33.000 --> 13:35.000]  I sue him
[13:35.000 --> 13:39.000]  If he issues a summons, he can bring that up as an affirmative defense
[13:39.000 --> 13:41.000]  Affirmative defense
[13:41.000 --> 13:45.000]  In the meantime, let's dance, bubba
[13:45.000 --> 13:49.000]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheelbarrow Radio
[13:49.000 --> 13:54.000]  I call in number 512-646-1984
[13:54.000 --> 13:56.000]  We'll go to our caller when we come back
[13:56.000 --> 13:58.000]  We'll be right back
[14:26.000 --> 14:28.000]  Debt collectors out of your credit report
[14:28.000 --> 14:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[14:32.000 --> 14:37.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[14:39.000 --> 14:43.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[14:43.000 --> 14:45.000]  And click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[14:45.000 --> 14:48.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[14:48.000 --> 14:50.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[14:50.000 --> 14:56.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[14:56.000 --> 14:59.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[14:59.000 --> 15:05.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[15:05.000 --> 15:11.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk
[15:11.000 --> 15:16.000]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[15:16.000 --> 15:23.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth
[15:23.000 --> 15:27.000]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark
[15:27.000 --> 15:31.000]  Where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message
[15:31.000 --> 15:38.000]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[15:38.000 --> 15:42.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[15:42.000 --> 15:49.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[15:49.000 --> 15:55.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[15:55.000 --> 15:59.000]  To inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures
[16:12.000 --> 16:22.000]  Look what we've got
[16:22.000 --> 16:26.000]  Who reacts to Christians?
[16:26.000 --> 16:28.000]  I wonder what they hide
[16:28.000 --> 16:31.000]  They don't have the answer
[16:31.000 --> 16:33.000]  Open up
[16:33.000 --> 16:36.000]  Who reacts to Christians?
[16:36.000 --> 16:38.000]  Look what we've got
[16:38.000 --> 16:41.000]  They don't have the answer
[16:41.000 --> 16:43.000]  Open up
[16:43.000 --> 16:46.000]  Who reacts to Christians?
[16:46.000 --> 16:48.000]  Look what we've got
[16:48.000 --> 16:51.000]  They don't have the answer
[16:51.000 --> 16:53.000]  Open up
[16:53.000 --> 16:56.000]  Who reacts to Christians?
[16:56.000 --> 16:58.000]  Look what we've got
[16:58.000 --> 17:01.000]  They don't have the answer
[17:01.000 --> 17:03.000]  Open up
[17:03.000 --> 17:07.000]  Who reacts toписed?
[17:08.000 --> 17:12.000]  They'll send it to the constable
[17:12.000 --> 17:22.000]  Turns out what I could have done was got an envelope for registered restricted return receipt
[17:22.000 --> 17:26.000]  Restricted means only the named person can sign for it
[17:26.000 --> 17:34.000]  And then the clerk can put documentation in the envelope and mail it to the accused
[17:34.000 --> 17:36.000]  The clerk can serve it
[17:36.000 --> 17:39.000]  Does that mean the clerk pays postage?
[17:39.000 --> 17:44.000]  No, I bring them the paid postage envelope
[17:44.000 --> 17:50.000]  They probably would have to pay postage, but that wasn't an argument I wanted to have
[17:50.000 --> 17:54.000]  So I just bring them an envelope, postage paid
[17:54.000 --> 17:59.000]  And so all they have to do is stuff it in the envelope, close it, send it
[17:59.000 --> 18:02.000]  I'm not sure that would be an easy thing to do
[18:02.000 --> 18:10.000]  They base it, they weigh it, and then they spend a few minutes taping it up and covering every little...
[18:10.000 --> 18:14.000]  No, no, no, they don't have to
[18:14.000 --> 18:19.000]  You close your documents, they don't
[18:19.000 --> 18:22.000]  So are you talking about the registered, the red one?
[18:22.000 --> 18:27.000]  Yeah, I'll get the envelope
[18:27.000 --> 18:31.000]  Get them to get the bill paid
[18:31.000 --> 18:36.000]  So everything's paid for and I've got the address and everything on it
[18:36.000 --> 18:40.000]  So all I have to do now is put the documents in it and seal it
[18:40.000 --> 18:47.000]  It's none of the post office's business what I put in it
[18:47.000 --> 18:55.000]  So long as I sign their little deal saying there's nothing in there that's explosive or poisonous
[18:55.000 --> 19:03.000]  Right, sure, but this is the one where they keep it under lock and key and they have audit trails for it
[19:03.000 --> 19:07.000]  Is that the same one you're talking about?
[19:07.000 --> 19:11.000]  Yeah, they have audit trails, they don't keep it under lock and key
[19:11.000 --> 19:13.000]  They just mail it
[19:13.000 --> 19:16.000]  So it's not the registered then?
[19:16.000 --> 19:26.000]  Yes, it's registered, but the clerk will then seal it up and bring it back to the...
[19:26.000 --> 19:32.000]  Okay
[19:32.000 --> 19:39.000]  Randy, did we lose you?
[19:39.000 --> 19:45.000]  Hello
[19:45.000 --> 19:55.000]  Randy?
[19:55.000 --> 20:06.000]  Well, I guess Randy, your mic may be muted
[20:06.000 --> 20:12.000]  It sounds like you're talking about the register which would be in the domestic mail manual
[20:12.000 --> 20:21.000]  I believe it's 503.2.14 that allows you to specify a man or a woman to receive it
[21:06.000 --> 21:21.000]  Okay, are you back Brett?
[21:21.000 --> 21:31.000]  I think you were talking about the domestic mail manual, the registered, that's the 503.2.14
[21:31.000 --> 21:36.000]  Does that allow you to send to a man or a woman?
[21:36.000 --> 21:43.000]  I think they'll all allow you to send it to a man or a woman
[21:43.000 --> 21:45.000]  Can you say that again?
[21:45.000 --> 21:49.000]  I think they'll all allow you to send it to a man or a woman
[21:49.000 --> 21:57.000]  Right, but then the red one, the registered, would be restricted so that it can only go to a man or a woman
[21:57.000 --> 22:02.000]  If you have the possibility of a delivery person signing for it or a front desk or a mail clerk or something
[22:02.000 --> 22:04.000]  It has to be that person
[22:04.000 --> 22:06.000]  Person named
[22:06.000 --> 22:10.000]  But that doesn't have anything to do with how you mail it
[22:10.000 --> 22:22.000]  I go to the clerk and I pay for it, I go back and have the court clerk put the document and summons in the envelope
[22:22.000 --> 22:25.000]  They can seal it and I'll take it back and mail it for them
[22:25.000 --> 22:28.000]  Or they can mail it themselves
[22:28.000 --> 22:38.000]  This way I don't get any crapola about the cost of mailing it
[22:38.000 --> 22:46.000]  Or I can give it to them and give them the code, the law, and say here, mail it certified mail
[22:46.000 --> 22:51.000]  If they want to charge me for the mailing cost, then go ahead
[22:51.000 --> 22:58.000]  But I want the clerk to serve it so I'm not stuck waiting for the constable to get around to it
[22:58.000 --> 23:05.000]  Yeah, because he sees the judge's name on there and he feels like it's not needing to be delivered anytime soon
[23:05.000 --> 23:07.000]  Yeah, that's exactly what
[23:07.000 --> 23:14.000]  And then if these guys don't deliver within a week, then I'm going to file a complaint against the constable
[23:14.000 --> 23:17.000]  Just to get their attention
[23:17.000 --> 23:20.000]  But I don't want to have that fight if I can avoid it
[23:20.000 --> 23:25.000]  I'll go ahead to the clerk and get her to serve it by registered mail
[23:25.000 --> 23:32.000]  And then I'll cancel my service to the constable and go down
[23:32.000 --> 23:35.000]  This constable knows me if it's the same one
[23:35.000 --> 23:40.000]  Because I was down there and I asked the bailiff to arrest the judge once
[23:40.000 --> 23:46.000]  And he said he couldn't do that, he has to administer the court
[23:47.000 --> 23:52.000]  Who would administer the court if the judge is in jail?
[23:52.000 --> 23:55.000]  I can't do this, let me take him to my boss
[23:55.000 --> 23:58.000]  No, he's going to remember that interaction
[23:58.000 --> 24:01.000]  Oh yeah, he takes me to his boss
[24:01.000 --> 24:05.000]  His boss tells me he's the chief constable
[24:05.000 --> 24:09.000]  He says what can I do for you? Arrest him
[24:09.000 --> 24:13.000]  And he said we're constables, we don't do that
[24:13.000 --> 24:16.000]  I said are you a certified peace officer?
[24:16.000 --> 24:17.000]  He said yes I am
[24:17.000 --> 24:21.000]  Then you do that, arrest him
[24:21.000 --> 24:25.000]  Oh Mr. Carlton, I can't arrest my own deputy
[24:25.000 --> 24:28.000]  How about if you go take this to the sheriff?
[24:28.000 --> 24:32.000]  They have an office right across the street, this is in Lake Worth
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  So I go across the street and I ask for someone to arrest the constable
[24:37.000 --> 24:42.000]  The woman tells me, well the captain just left, I'll get him back
[24:42.000 --> 24:46.000]  So while we're waiting for him to come back, the constable shows up
[24:46.000 --> 24:52.000]  And he said Mr. Carlton if you want, I can file this with the district attorney
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.000]  Oh no no no, I'll get to the district attorney
[24:56.000 --> 25:00.000]  But I haven't got everybody entangled yet
[25:00.000 --> 25:04.000]  I got your bailiff and I got you
[25:04.000 --> 25:06.000]  Now I want to get the sheriff
[25:06.000 --> 25:10.000]  And once I get him, then I'll go to the district attorney
[25:10.000 --> 25:13.000]  About that time the captain shows up
[25:13.000 --> 25:15.000]  What can I do for you?
[25:15.000 --> 25:19.000]  I need you to arrest him and I point over at the constable
[25:19.000 --> 25:24.000]  And he just kind of holds up both hands and shrugs his shoulders
[25:24.000 --> 25:27.000]  Oh what can I do?
[25:27.000 --> 25:30.000]  I said what can't I arrest him? He's a cheery cat
[25:30.000 --> 25:33.000]  Just throw the cuffs on him and drag him off to jail
[25:33.000 --> 25:35.000]  He ain't got far to go, heck you're already in it
[25:35.000 --> 25:38.000]  And he refused, I told him to take his chicken suit off
[25:38.000 --> 25:40.000]  He wouldn't take his chicken suit off
[25:40.000 --> 25:43.000]  And then I turned to the constable and I said
[25:43.000 --> 25:46.000]  Now I'll go to the district attorney
[25:46.000 --> 25:49.000]  And the constable just shook his head up
[25:49.000 --> 25:51.000]  So he'll remember me
[25:51.000 --> 25:55.000]  Oh yeah, that's not the kind of thing that people say to him every day
[25:55.000 --> 25:57.000]  Probably not
[25:57.000 --> 26:02.000]  Okay, oh my God in the goodness, we lost our caller
[26:02.000 --> 26:05.000]  Brett, when I went down
[26:05.000 --> 26:07.000]  Oh man, our first time caller
[26:07.000 --> 26:12.000]  Brett, when I dropped off, did you drop off as well?
[26:12.000 --> 26:14.000]  Yeah, the whole thing
[26:14.000 --> 26:17.000]  Okay, maybe that's why
[26:17.000 --> 26:22.000]  If you are a first time caller, give us a call back
[26:22.000 --> 26:25.000]  We got the thing back up, I thought it was me
[26:25.000 --> 26:30.000]  So we're back up and running, we had a little internet glitch there
[26:30.000 --> 26:34.000]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call
[26:34.000 --> 26:39.000]  A call in number 512-646-1984
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  And if we don't have any callers when we come back
[26:42.000 --> 26:45.000]  I'm going to talk about the strategy
[26:45.000 --> 26:50.000]  Of how I think this particular strategy
[26:50.000 --> 26:53.000]  Will pretty well fix the system
[26:53.000 --> 26:56.000]  We'll be right back
[27:00.000 --> 27:03.000]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information
[27:03.000 --> 27:05.000]  And you may trust them to keep it safe
[27:05.000 --> 27:07.000]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies
[27:07.000 --> 27:10.000]  May be unwittingly revealing your secrets
[27:10.000 --> 27:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details
[27:33.000 --> 27:36.000]  Data privacy is a big deal
[27:36.000 --> 27:39.000]  So nearly every company has a policy explaining
[27:39.000 --> 27:41.000]  How they handle your personal information
[27:41.000 --> 27:44.000]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[27:44.000 --> 27:45.000]  It's not an idle question
[27:45.000 --> 27:47.000]  According to a recent survey
[27:47.000 --> 27:50.000]  A shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit
[27:50.000 --> 27:53.000]  Their security was breached by hackers in the last year
[27:53.000 --> 27:55.000]  That's why it's important to know
[27:55.000 --> 27:57.000]  That data privacy is a big deal
[27:57.000 --> 27:59.000]  And that's why it's important to know
[28:00.000 --> 28:02.000]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches
[28:02.000 --> 28:04.000]  To Startpage.com
[28:04.000 --> 28:05.000]  Unlike other search engines
[28:05.000 --> 28:08.000]  Startpage doesn't store any data on you
[28:08.000 --> 28:09.000]  They've never been hacked
[28:09.000 --> 28:10.000]  But even if they were
[28:10.000 --> 28:12.000]  There would be nothing for criminals to see
[28:12.000 --> 28:14.000]  The cupboard would be bare
[28:14.000 --> 28:17.000]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way
[28:17.000 --> 28:19.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[28:19.000 --> 28:22.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[28:29.000 --> 28:32.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son
[28:32.000 --> 28:34.000]  On September 11, 2001
[28:34.000 --> 28:38.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11
[28:38.000 --> 28:39.000]  World Trade Center 7
[28:39.000 --> 28:42.000]  A 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane
[28:42.000 --> 28:46.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7
[28:46.000 --> 28:50.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[28:50.000 --> 28:52.000]  And believe there is more to the story
[28:52.000 --> 28:55.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son
[28:55.000 --> 28:57.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org
[28:57.000 --> 29:00.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do
[29:01.000 --> 29:04.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[29:04.000 --> 29:07.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[29:07.000 --> 29:09.000]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[29:09.000 --> 29:12.000]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[29:12.000 --> 29:14.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[29:14.000 --> 29:16.000]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[29:19.000 --> 29:21.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[29:21.000 --> 29:24.000]  To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[29:27.000 --> 29:30.000]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[29:30.000 --> 29:32.000]  That will help you understand what due process is
[29:32.000 --> 29:34.000]  And how to hold courts to the rule of law
[29:34.000 --> 29:36.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[29:36.000 --> 29:39.000]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[29:39.000 --> 29:41.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[29:41.000 --> 29:44.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[29:44.000 --> 29:46.000]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[29:46.000 --> 29:49.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[29:49.000 --> 29:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[29:53.000 --> 29:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000]  I don't understand
[30:25.000 --> 30:28.000]  Your job is to protect and to serve
[30:28.000 --> 30:31.000]  Not be unabused
[30:31.000 --> 30:33.000]  Happy sir
[30:33.000 --> 30:36.000]  When you gonna stop abuse
[30:36.000 --> 30:39.000]  Your power
[30:39.000 --> 30:42.000]  When you gonna stop abuse
[30:42.000 --> 30:45.000]  Your power
[30:45.000 --> 30:48.000]  When you gonna stop abuse
[30:48.000 --> 30:51.000]  Your power
[30:51.000 --> 30:54.000]  When you gonna stop abuse
[30:54.000 --> 30:57.000]  Your power
[30:57.000 --> 30:59.000]  Okay, we are back
[30:59.000 --> 31:02.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[31:02.000 --> 31:08.000]  On this Thursday, the fifth day of December, 2024
[31:08.000 --> 31:13.000]  And we're talking about what may be the fix
[31:13.000 --> 31:16.000]  At least a fix
[31:16.000 --> 31:19.000]  To part of our problem with the criminal justice system
[31:19.000 --> 31:23.000]  Approximately how many criminal charges have you filed?
[31:23.000 --> 31:26.000]  I don't know, hundreds
[31:26.000 --> 31:33.000]  How many times has a warrant been issued based on a criminal complaint that you filed?
[31:33.000 --> 31:36.000]  As far as I know, zero
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  Me too
[31:38.000 --> 31:42.000]  And everybody else I know who's done this
[31:42.000 --> 31:46.000]  It is a standard procedure
[31:46.000 --> 31:53.000]  Public officials to refuse to act in accordance with standing law
[31:53.000 --> 31:56.000]  I had one JP actually tell me
[31:56.000 --> 32:00.000]  It didn't come from a law enforcement officer so my hands are tied
[32:00.000 --> 32:02.000]  I can't do anything about this
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  He literally had no idea what the law said
[32:05.000 --> 32:11.000]  I had the one in Wood County when I was trying to get him to arrest the sheriff's deputy
[32:11.000 --> 32:14.000]  And the one who arrested you
[32:14.000 --> 32:21.000]  He told me that since I wasn't a law enforcement officer, he wasn't going to take my complaint
[32:21.000 --> 32:24.000]  So I'll be coming back to Wood County
[32:24.000 --> 32:26.000]  They're going to owe me dinner
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  And I'm going to sue this guy
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  In the JP court there
[32:34.000 --> 32:38.000]  We'll see how that works out for him
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  But anyway, the strategy
[32:41.000 --> 32:44.000]  Is to get this fixed
[32:44.000 --> 32:46.000]  There is a judge
[32:46.000 --> 32:50.000]  The suit that I filed against all the highest judges
[32:50.000 --> 32:57.000]  And the court of appeals, the fifth circuit, threw it out with one sentence
[32:57.000 --> 33:01.000]  Said the suit is frivolous, dismissed with prejudice
[33:01.000 --> 33:06.000]  I'm going to file criminal charges against those three judges for doing that
[33:06.000 --> 33:11.000]  With the U.S. attorney, run the routine on the U.S. attorney
[33:11.000 --> 33:14.000]  With the U.S. grand jury
[33:14.000 --> 33:19.000]  And when the U.S. attorney intercepts it, then I'll run the routine on the U.S. attorney
[33:19.000 --> 33:24.000]  But in the meantime
[33:24.000 --> 33:34.000]  What happened after that is the 2024 bench book, they added a sentence to it
[33:34.000 --> 33:39.000]  Do you have the exact wording of that sentence?
[33:39.000 --> 33:42.000]  I'm not sure how it was before
[33:42.000 --> 33:46.000]  But it does say that probable cause must be determined
[33:46.000 --> 33:48.000]  Probable cause must be determined
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  So you got this judge in Houston
[33:52.000 --> 33:54.000]  County court number five
[33:54.000 --> 33:58.000]  He is putting his hearings on the internet
[33:58.000 --> 34:00.000]  He's somewhat flamboyant
[34:00.000 --> 34:05.000]  He wears these suits that look like something Captain Kangaroo would wear
[34:05.000 --> 34:12.000]  They're all kinds of blue and green and yellow
[34:12.000 --> 34:17.000]  The last one I saw him in was blue with big flowery things all over it
[34:17.000 --> 34:19.000]  He looked like a clown
[34:19.000 --> 34:23.000]  But he's on the internet
[34:23.000 --> 34:28.000]  And he's doing probable cause determinations
[34:28.000 --> 34:33.000]  He has the guy brought before him, the guy's in street clothes
[34:33.000 --> 34:37.000]  So he's clearly not brought directly out of the jail
[34:37.000 --> 34:41.000]  And sometimes they have lawyers, sometimes they don't
[34:41.000 --> 34:47.000]  And then he has the prosecutor read the complaint
[34:47.000 --> 34:53.000]  Or the affidavit, a statement by the arresting officer
[34:53.000 --> 34:57.000]  And then he says, I find probable cause
[34:57.000 --> 35:01.000]  But hey, that is a couple of steps in the right direction
[35:01.000 --> 35:02.000]  Yeah, it is
[35:02.000 --> 35:05.000]  At least they're doing probable cause
[35:05.000 --> 35:11.000]  Now the question is not whether you have a right to probable cause determination
[35:11.000 --> 35:13.000]  That's been handled
[35:13.000 --> 35:17.000]  Now the question is, how do you do it?
[35:17.000 --> 35:20.000]  How do you find probable cause?
[35:20.000 --> 35:23.000]  The bench book tells them
[35:23.000 --> 35:27.000]  All you have to do is look at the officer's statement
[35:27.000 --> 35:31.000]  And then say out loud, quote, I find probable cause
[35:31.000 --> 35:34.000]  We'll see how that works out for him
[35:34.000 --> 35:41.000]  My son-in-law, there is a famous writer that lives in paradise about five miles west of me
[35:41.000 --> 35:46.000]  He was drunk one night and he went to bed and passed out
[35:46.000 --> 35:49.000]  And his idiot brother-in-law showed up with his stupid dog
[35:49.000 --> 35:52.000]  And his dog attacked the next door that he was big
[35:52.000 --> 35:57.000]  Big to do and had to put the pig down, big commotion
[35:57.000 --> 36:02.000]  Well, he gets up next morning and the police was out there and he gets up
[36:02.000 --> 36:05.000]  And for some reason they arrested him
[36:05.000 --> 36:08.000]  And my son-in-law knew him personally and he said
[36:08.000 --> 36:14.000]  You know, I looked at the charging instruments and stuff and this guy didn't do anything
[36:14.000 --> 36:18.000]  There was no reason for him to be here
[36:18.000 --> 36:24.000]  I said, why didn't you hold a examining trial?
[36:24.000 --> 36:29.000]  He said, I don't know how to hold an examining trial
[36:29.000 --> 36:31.000]  Uh-oh
[36:31.000 --> 36:33.000]  That's what I said, uh-oh
[36:33.000 --> 36:36.000]  He wanted to, he wanted to send this guy home
[36:36.000 --> 36:43.000]  He wanted to do what magistrates were put there to do
[36:43.000 --> 36:47.000]  So, I'm going to go to this magistrate
[36:47.000 --> 36:56.000]  And tell him that I appreciate the fact that he's finding probable cause
[36:56.000 --> 37:04.000]  I don't appreciate the fact that you're not doing it in accordance with Chapter 16 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
[37:04.000 --> 37:09.000]  And I would very much like for you to look at the codes
[37:09.000 --> 37:17.000]  And I'm going to send him a dissertation on how the codes, how they all line up
[37:17.000 --> 37:21.000]  Why the examining trial is critical
[37:21.000 --> 37:25.000]  And then ask him to do it this way
[37:25.000 --> 37:28.000]  And then see how it works out
[37:28.000 --> 37:32.000]  I'm going to suggest to him that if you do it this way
[37:32.000 --> 37:38.000]  And the way he's doing it, he is being reasonable and rational
[37:38.000 --> 37:44.000]  And treating the people for the most part with dignity and respect, not totally
[37:44.000 --> 37:48.000]  He had one guy coming in there with this hatred, mythology stuff
[37:48.000 --> 37:50.000]  And he thought that was funny
[37:50.000 --> 37:53.000]  Said, I've been waiting for one of these guys
[37:53.000 --> 37:58.000]  I thought, you have, huh? I've been waiting to kick your behind, too
[37:58.000 --> 38:03.000]  He's belittling this guy because he had the gumption to stand up for himself
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  That I was not happy with
[38:05.000 --> 38:10.000]  However, for the most part, he treats people with dignity and respect
[38:10.000 --> 38:23.000]  And he has the prosecutor come up and read the resting officer's report
[38:23.000 --> 38:26.000]  And then he says, I find probable cause
[38:27.000 --> 38:32.000]  Apparently, he's doing exactly what the bridge book tells him to do
[38:32.000 --> 38:36.000]  Well, I'm going to send him a copy of my suit
[38:36.000 --> 38:43.000]  And I'm going to send him a cover letter with a dissertation on due process
[38:43.000 --> 38:46.000]  How it's supposed to be done
[38:46.000 --> 38:49.000]  I claim that if it's done this way
[38:49.000 --> 38:55.000]  That the people won't feel like they're being so oppressed by the police
[38:55.000 --> 38:58.000]  They may not be happy with you
[38:58.000 --> 39:04.000]  But at least they will have had the opportunity to tell their side of the story
[39:04.000 --> 39:07.000]  What 1604 commands is
[39:07.000 --> 39:10.000]  Before any evidence is entered against the accused
[39:10.000 --> 39:13.000]  Or sent into the judge against the accused
[39:13.000 --> 39:16.000]  The accused shall be given an opportunity statement
[39:16.000 --> 39:21.000]  That allows the accused to bring in exculpatory evidence
[39:21.000 --> 39:24.000]  That then the prosecution has to deal with
[39:24.000 --> 39:28.000]  Well, I'm going to ask him to do that
[39:28.000 --> 39:31.000]  And then see how it works out
[39:31.000 --> 39:33.000]  If it works out well for him
[39:33.000 --> 39:37.000]  The big problem is there is no 1617 order in the record
[39:37.000 --> 39:39.000]  So you have a problem
[39:39.000 --> 39:42.000]  You don't have subject matter jurisdiction in any of these cases
[39:42.000 --> 39:44.000]  Unless you do it this way
[39:44.000 --> 39:46.000]  And if you do it this way
[39:46.000 --> 39:48.000]  Try it out
[39:48.000 --> 39:49.000]  See if it works out well
[39:49.000 --> 39:52.000]  If it does, I want you to go down to Austin
[39:52.000 --> 39:59.000]  And explain to the Senate subcommittee hearing on criminal justice
[39:59.000 --> 40:03.000]  How it is supposed to be done
[40:03.000 --> 40:07.000]  Yeah, and it sounds like he would be up for that
[40:07.000 --> 40:10.000]  From the way that he's been conducting himself
[40:10.000 --> 40:13.000]  And trying to make a name for himself on the internet and so forth
[40:13.000 --> 40:16.000]  It seems like he would be up for it
[40:16.000 --> 40:18.000]  Go and talk to them about that
[40:18.000 --> 40:22.000]  See the face of the change
[40:22.000 --> 40:24.000]  That's the feel I got
[40:24.000 --> 40:27.000]  So I'm trying not to do this confrontational
[40:27.000 --> 40:30.000]  But if he blows me off
[40:30.000 --> 40:33.000]  Then Brett and I, and we'll get a couple more
[40:33.000 --> 40:36.000]  We'll go down the next time he's having
[40:36.000 --> 40:38.000]  Doing probable cause determinations
[40:38.000 --> 40:42.000]  I'll get a list of everybody he's going to bring up
[40:42.000 --> 40:46.000]  And when he's done, I'll have a criminal complaint for each one of them
[40:46.000 --> 40:50.000]  I'll take it up to the bailiff and ask him to arrest the judge
[40:50.000 --> 40:54.000]  And then when he refuses, I'll go to a JP
[40:54.000 --> 40:58.000]  And JP refuses, I sue him
[40:58.000 --> 41:02.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:02.000 --> 41:06.000]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:06.000 --> 41:10.000]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:10.000 --> 41:15.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[41:15.000 --> 41:17.000]  By lowering the claims cost?
[41:17.000 --> 41:23.000]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[41:23.000 --> 41:29.000]  That provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc
[41:29.000 --> 41:32.000]  All at zero cost, with zero co-pay
[41:32.000 --> 41:38.000]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[41:38.000 --> 41:44.000]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[41:44.000 --> 41:50.000]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit
[41:50.000 --> 41:58.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[42:14.000 --> 42:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[42:18.000 --> 42:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[42:22.000 --> 42:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too
[42:27.000 --> 42:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[42:33.000 --> 42:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[42:38.000 --> 42:42.000]  About the principles and practices that control our American courts
[42:42.000 --> 42:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[42:51.000 --> 43:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[43:13.000 --> 43:19.000]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[43:19.000 --> 43:25.000]  If you could not wait any bout too long, would your purpose have to be done?
[43:25.000 --> 43:31.000]  Such a sentiment, a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling to keep the peace
[43:31.000 --> 43:36.000]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police
[43:36.000 --> 43:39.000]  Watching the spots fly
[43:39.000 --> 43:41.000]  Okay, we are back
[43:41.000 --> 43:44.000]  Randy Kelton and Brett with Mountain Rule of Law Radio
[43:44.000 --> 43:46.000]  Going to our callers
[43:46.000 --> 43:50.000]  But let me finish up just a little, I got cut off at the end
[43:50.000 --> 43:56.000]  If the judge doesn't hold a proper examining trial, I'll file criminal charges against him with his bailiff
[43:56.000 --> 44:03.000]  And when the bailiff doesn't arrest the judge, I'll make up criminal complaints against the bailiff
[44:03.000 --> 44:11.000]  Take those to a justice of the peace and file all the complaints with the justice of the peace
[44:11.000 --> 44:17.000]  When the justice of the peace refuses to issue warrants, I'll take out my trustee lawsuit
[44:17.000 --> 44:24.000]  Go to the next JP and sue the judge for not issuing warrants
[44:24.000 --> 44:28.000]  That should stir up a hornet's nest
[44:28.000 --> 44:32.000]  Okay, now we're going to our callers
[44:32.000 --> 44:36.000]  We have a first-time caller from 725 Area Code
[44:36.000 --> 44:40.000]  Give us a first name and a state
[44:40.000 --> 44:44.000]  Yes, hi, this is David with Rains County Radio
[44:44.000 --> 44:46.000]  We actually interviewed you a while back
[44:46.000 --> 44:50.000]  Oh yes, yes, I remember you
[44:50.000 --> 44:54.000]  Well, I have an issue with an insurance company
[44:54.000 --> 44:59.000]  I got rear-ended, and the insurance company from the other person
[44:59.000 --> 45:09.000]  Determined that my van was too old and had too much miles on it to be considered worth replacing
[45:09.000 --> 45:15.000]  First they gave me an estimate, I sent them the pictures, that they'd give me like $6,000
[45:15.000 --> 45:17.000]  They estimated to get it fixed
[45:17.000 --> 45:23.000]  Then like five minutes later I got an email saying, oh well, due to the mileage in the year of the car
[45:23.000 --> 45:27.000]  We considered a total loss, we're only going to give you $1,500
[45:27.000 --> 45:31.000]  And it's a 2002 Chrysler, I had 300,000 miles on it
[45:31.000 --> 45:35.000]  But you know, I've been taking good care of it, that's why it's been running that long
[45:35.000 --> 45:40.000]  And you were emotionally attached to that car
[45:40.000 --> 45:44.000]  Well, there's a lot of memories and stuff on it
[45:44.000 --> 45:51.000]  If you have insurance, and your car is damaged
[45:51.000 --> 45:57.000]  And let's say you run it off the road and damage it yourself
[45:57.000 --> 46:02.000]  You're stuck with what your insurance company will pay you
[46:02.000 --> 46:09.000]  But this wasn't your insurance, you don't care what the insurance company, you could care less what they got to say
[46:09.000 --> 46:14.000]  Somebody rear-ended you and injured you
[46:14.000 --> 46:20.000]  You are harmed to whatever amount you claim you're harmed at
[46:20.000 --> 46:24.000]  You tell the insurance company to go scratch
[46:24.000 --> 46:28.000]  And we'll just sue you
[46:28.000 --> 46:31.000]  Here's the insurance company's problem
[46:31.000 --> 46:37.000]  Would I go about the suit in my county or do I have to do it in the county that they're in?
[46:37.000 --> 46:48.000]  You have to sue in the county either where the incident occurred or where the defendant lives
[46:49.000 --> 46:54.000]  You mean the person that was driving the car?
[46:54.000 --> 46:58.000]  Yes, where the other party lives
[46:58.000 --> 47:02.000]  So this is not so hard
[47:02.000 --> 47:05.000]  You can do this in small claims
[47:05.000 --> 47:09.000]  You can sue up to $20,000 in small claims
[47:09.000 --> 47:13.000]  So I suggest you do a $19,000 suit
[47:13.000 --> 47:20.000]  The reason for a $19,000 suit is the insurance company, when you sue them in small claims court
[47:20.000 --> 47:23.000]  They're going to have lawyers
[47:23.000 --> 47:29.000]  And they're going to want to attach attorney fees
[47:29.000 --> 47:35.000]  That becomes important because of the Stowars Doctrine
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  Write down Stowars, S-T-O-W-E-R-S, no apostrophe
[47:40.000 --> 47:42.000]  Doctrine
[47:42.000 --> 47:55.000]  What that doctrine says is that if an insurer has a party that's being sued
[47:55.000 --> 48:03.000]  And the party that's being sued offers a settlement
[48:03.000 --> 48:07.000]  And the insurance company decides they don't like that settlement
[48:07.000 --> 48:16.000]  Let's say you sue for $19,000 and you offer to settle for $10,000
[48:16.000 --> 48:21.000]  And the insurance company says, no, we can do better than that in court
[48:21.000 --> 48:29.000]  And they go to court and the jury awards you $20,000
[48:29.000 --> 48:36.000]  To make it a better example, let's say you sue in a higher court, like a county court
[48:36.000 --> 48:41.000]  And I say JP court because it's easy and it only costs $50
[48:41.000 --> 48:50.000]  But if you sue in a county court, you can ask for $20,000, $50,000, whatever you want
[48:50.000 --> 48:53.000]  They make an offer
[48:53.000 --> 49:01.000]  If the insurance company doesn't accept the offer, they think they can do better at trial
[49:01.000 --> 49:04.000]  But they do worse at trial
[49:04.000 --> 49:16.000]  And let's say the jury's PO'd at them and gives you a ruling
[49:16.000 --> 49:22.000]  Grants you a claim that's in excess of the insurance amount
[49:22.000 --> 49:31.000]  The insurance company has to pay it, even though it's in excess of their policy amounts
[49:31.000 --> 49:38.000]  What they said is the insurance company cannot play fast and loose with their clients' funds
[49:38.000 --> 49:43.000]  So when you sue the client, the insurance company will take over the suit
[49:43.000 --> 49:51.000]  So if they decide not to take a deal and then the client gets charged more
[49:51.000 --> 49:56.000]  Even if it's more than you've insured them for, you have to pay the whole thing
[49:56.000 --> 50:00.000]  Otherwise, you'd cost your client money
[50:00.000 --> 50:02.000]  That's the Stowars Doctrine
[50:02.000 --> 50:10.000]  So what that does is give the insurance company an incentive to make a deal with you
[50:10.000 --> 50:19.000]  So the suit itself doesn't matter if you file it in the JP or the county
[50:19.000 --> 50:24.000]  If you file it in the county, then you want to bump the amount on Upsum
[50:24.000 --> 50:35.000]  So it's a little bit above whatever the minimum insurance rate is
[50:35.000 --> 50:38.000]  So sue them for $60,000
[50:38.000 --> 50:50.000]  You're terrified of driving now, you're having PTSD and extreme emotional distress
[50:51.000 --> 51:00.000]  I just want a reliable replacement
[51:00.000 --> 51:06.000]  Just sue them in the JP court
[51:06.000 --> 51:10.000]  Sue them for $19,000
[51:10.000 --> 51:14.000]  Then make a deal
[51:14.000 --> 51:20.000]  Okay, so once again, I have to do it in the county where either the accident occurred
[51:20.000 --> 51:29.000]  Or where the driver that ran into me lives
[51:29.000 --> 51:30.000]  Yes
[51:30.000 --> 51:36.000]  One of those two things? Okay, that's probably going to soon be the same county
[51:36.000 --> 51:40.000]  So I would go to the Justice of the Peace there
[51:40.000 --> 51:44.000]  You know, I'd hate to do that to the person
[51:44.000 --> 51:50.000]  I would prefer to talk with them to say, hey, look, this is what's going on
[51:50.000 --> 51:53.000]  What's going to happen if you try to talk to them?
[51:53.000 --> 51:56.000]  They're going to send you to the insurance company
[51:56.000 --> 52:00.000]  And the lawyers are going to do a song and dance and sell you down your pants
[52:00.000 --> 52:05.000]  So you want to get the lawyers to want to make you a deal
[52:05.000 --> 52:12.000]  So since they offered you $1,500, you're insulted by that
[52:12.000 --> 52:20.000]  And you consider that bad faith
[52:20.000 --> 52:23.000]  And bargrieve the lawyer
[52:23.000 --> 52:32.000]  File a complaint with the State Bar Association accusing the lawyer of acting in bad faith
[52:32.000 --> 52:33.000]  Okay
[52:33.000 --> 52:38.000]  So you know what will happen when you file a bar grievance against a lawyer?
[52:38.000 --> 52:39.000]  Okay
[52:39.000 --> 52:41.000]  Nothing
[52:41.000 --> 52:45.000]  State Bar will get that grievance and they'll throw it in the trash
[52:45.000 --> 52:49.000]  And they'll send you this letter back that says we examined into your accusation
[52:49.000 --> 52:53.000]  Find it does not rise to the level of misconduct
[52:53.000 --> 52:58.000]  Something else will happen that they're not going to tell you about
[52:58.000 --> 53:03.000]  That lawyer has errors in emissions policy
[53:03.000 --> 53:10.000]  There are nine underwriters of legal errors and emissions in the country
[53:10.000 --> 53:12.000]  They are all underwritten by lawyers of London
[53:12.000 --> 53:16.000]  They all have the same requirements
[53:16.000 --> 53:20.000]  If you get one bargrieve, it's your first year of practice
[53:20.000 --> 53:24.000]  Valid, invalid, they don't care
[53:24.000 --> 53:28.000]  They know that no matter what you file against that lawyer
[53:28.000 --> 53:32.000]  The State Bar is going to get it and throw it in the trash
[53:32.000 --> 53:35.000]  I've got a couple hundred of them
[53:35.000 --> 53:40.000]  It makes no difference what you accuse them of, they're going to throw it in the trash
[53:40.000 --> 53:43.000]  And their insurance carrier knows that
[53:43.000 --> 53:46.000]  So how do they gauge their level of risk?
[53:46.000 --> 53:48.000]  By valid bar grievances?
[53:48.000 --> 53:50.000]  They throw them all in the trash
[53:50.000 --> 53:52.000]  By the numbers
[53:52.000 --> 53:54.000]  One bargrieve, it's your first year of practice
[53:54.000 --> 53:57.000]  They cancel immediately
[53:57.000 --> 54:01.000]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they cancel
[54:01.000 --> 54:04.000]  If you've been practicing 20 years, they cancel
[54:04.000 --> 54:08.000]  Three, they'll cancel your law firms malpractice insurance
[54:08.000 --> 54:15.000]  Russell Mortland in Hays County
[54:15.000 --> 54:19.000]  San Angelo, what's the town in Hays County?
[54:19.000 --> 54:21.000]  San Marcos
[54:21.000 --> 54:25.000]  He's in a bankruptcy, he filed three bar grievances against his attorney
[54:25.000 --> 54:28.000]  And halfway through his attorney disappears
[54:28.000 --> 54:31.000]  At the end the attorney comes back
[54:31.000 --> 54:37.000]  And complained to the court that Mr. Mortland filed three bar grievances against me
[54:37.000 --> 54:41.000]  And the next year our law firm couldn't get malpractice insurance
[54:41.000 --> 54:46.000]  We had to shut down and open in a new name
[54:46.000 --> 54:52.000]  I heard that and said, Bubba, you should not play poker
[54:52.000 --> 54:56.000]  So, first thing you do is bargrieve the lawyer
[54:56.000 --> 54:59.000]  It don't matter if it's valid or not
[54:59.000 --> 55:01.000]  The bar don't care
[55:01.000 --> 55:03.000]  Just hammer him
[55:03.000 --> 55:05.000]  He's just playing poker
[55:05.000 --> 55:07.000]  Increasing your hand
[55:07.000 --> 55:13.000]  Then you push them, you sue them for 19 grand
[55:13.000 --> 55:16.000]  Make me a deal, guys
[55:16.000 --> 55:20.000]  It's going to cost them more in lawyer fees
[55:20.000 --> 55:25.000]  Than what it cost them just to write you a check
[55:25.000 --> 55:28.000]  Then you ask them for whatever you actually want
[55:28.000 --> 55:30.000]  Yeah, to settle in good faith
[55:30.000 --> 55:32.000]  Well, you know, on top of this
[55:32.000 --> 55:36.000]  I remember a time when I first started driving, insurance was not mandatory
[55:36.000 --> 55:42.000]  And if you got in a wreck, you went out, you traded phone numbers, you traded addresses
[55:42.000 --> 55:44.000]  Whoever was at fault, they...
[55:44.000 --> 55:47.000]  Okay, hold on, we're about to go to our sponsors
[55:47.000 --> 55:49.000]  We'll be right back
[55:49.000 --> 55:53.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[55:53.000 --> 55:57.000]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it
[55:57.000 --> 56:01.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[56:01.000 --> 56:05.000]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture
[56:05.000 --> 56:08.000]  Enter the recovery version
[56:08.000 --> 56:12.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate
[56:12.000 --> 56:17.000]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes
[56:17.000 --> 56:21.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[56:21.000 --> 56:27.000]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[56:27.000 --> 56:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[56:32.000 --> 56:37.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free
[56:37.000 --> 56:42.000]  At 1-888-551-0102
[56:42.000 --> 56:46.000]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[56:46.000 --> 56:49.000]  That's freestudybible.com
[56:49.000 --> 56:59.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com
[56:59.000 --> 57:04.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[57:04.000 --> 57:08.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[57:08.000 --> 57:10.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[57:10.000 --> 57:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[57:16.000 --> 57:18.000]  Privacy is under attack
[57:18.000 --> 57:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[57:21.000 --> 57:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[57:26.000 --> 57:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[57:31.000 --> 57:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[57:34.000 --> 57:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[57:37.000 --> 57:41.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[57:41.000 --> 57:45.000]  Start over with Startpage
[57:45.000 --> 57:48.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed
[57:48.000 --> 57:51.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there
[57:51.000 --> 57:54.000]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight
[57:54.000 --> 58:00.000]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the third amendment was designed to prevent
[58:00.000 --> 58:06.000]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers
[58:06.000 --> 58:08.000]  Third party, third amendment, get it?
[58:08.000 --> 58:12.000]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging
[58:12.000 --> 58:16.000]  Tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the third amendment
[58:16.000 --> 58:21.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[58:31.000 --> 58:34.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[58:34.000 --> 58:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[58:38.000 --> 58:40.000]  Our liberty depends on it
[58:40.000 --> 58:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[58:46.000 --> 58:48.000]  Privacy is under attack
[58:48.000 --> 58:51.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[58:51.000 --> 58:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[58:56.000 --> 59:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[59:01.000 --> 59:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[59:07.000 --> 59:11.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[59:11.000 --> 59:14.000]  Start over with Startpage
[59:14.000 --> 59:20.000]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles
[59:20.000 --> 59:26.000]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure
[59:26.000 --> 59:29.000]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[59:29.000 --> 59:34.000]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security
[59:34.000 --> 59:38.000]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing
[59:38.000 --> 59:45.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells
[59:45.000 --> 59:52.000]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth
[59:52.000 --> 59:57.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:32.000]  OK, this is Randy Kelton-Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Thursday, the fifth day of December, 2024
[01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  And we're talking to David in Texas, and this should be pretty easy, David
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  File the suit, the attorney will either call you and be crappy to you, or he will file a response to the suit
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  And I love to take responses apart, just rip them to shreds
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  And they all got bad case law
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  Look at their case law and look up their case law and look for the citation they use
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:15.000]  And 80% of the time it's not in there
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  Just use trash
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  And one of the worst things they could do is use bad case law
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  And so you file for sanctions and bar grieve them for using bad case law
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  That'll cut a button off their shirt
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  And about the second time you bar grieve them, they're going to want to make a deal
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Because you're going to cost way more than $1,500 is nothing, $19,000 is pretty well nothing
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  You're going to cost the lawyer that much in increased
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  Now, practice insurance starts at $15,000
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  Generally it starts between $15,000 and $25,000
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  You bar grieve him, and if he's been practicing more than a year, it's likely to double his amount of practice insurance
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  Even if you don't get it canceled
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  Lawyers are low hanging fruit
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  And if I could, I had one observation I wanted to share with you in the history
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  When I first started to drive, insurance was not mandatory
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  And basically what I found is people had more personal responsibility back then
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  Because if you got in a wreck, you both got out of your cars
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  You exchanged phone numbers, addresses
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  Whoever was at fault would go have the guy send them two estimates
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  And then you became friends usually because you'd worked it out
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  But right now if you run into somebody, it's like they dish off responsibility
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  They try to weasel out and everything because I guess they can go through later
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:06.000]  So it actually, mandatory insurance, and I don't even know if it's constitutional or not
[01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  Actually changed human behavior over a period of time
[01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  I agree
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:21.000]  And you're showing your age because if I remember right, that requirement came in in 1981
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:24.000]  Yeah, I'm 71
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  Oh, you're young
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  Yeah, I've been driving around a lot
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  You're young, I'm old
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  Okay, well you're doing great stuff, and God bless you for what you're doing, and I'm psyched
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  I'll keep you posted on what's going on here
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  Yeah, let us know, and if one of the things, you hear what we were talking about earlier about suing JPs?
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  Yes, yes, if the bailiffs wouldn't do it, then you go to the JP
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  And if they don't do it, then you sue the JP
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  But I wish I could do it in my county because the JP loves me, you know, I mean
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  I have a problem because one of the JPs is my son-in-law
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  Well, that could be it, but I mean this happened in a county north of me
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  And that's where an accident occurred, and then that's where I believe the person that ran into me
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  That's probably the one he lives in, but I'll find that all out, and I'll keep you posted on it, and thanks
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:34.000]  I'm really psyched about going about it now, and I'll keep you posted, Randy
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Okay, and Brett needed you last week
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  Are you telling Brett?
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  Oh, so Randy knows that I've been looking for someone in Rains County
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  I've been looking for a good long time for someone who
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  There's a petition that needs to be filed to yank a lawless judge off the bench
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  But the way the statute is written, the petition has to be signed by at least one person who is a resident of that county
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  So yeah, I didn't manage to run into anybody who'd been wronged
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  And had a bone to pick or was interested in rectifying the lawlessness of our system
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  So if you had called in a week ago, I probably would have wanted you to take a look at that
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  His clock ran out
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  Yeah, I think it had to be done by November 29
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Actually, I'll go take a look at it again and just make sure about that
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  What is your radio station there in Rains County?
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  It's called rainscountyradio.com
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  We've got your interview up, I did Diamond and Silk, I did Trump's Photographer from 2016
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  One thing I'm really proud of, you can go to a page that says global stations
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  And there's a globe and you click on any city, you can listen to any radio station in the world live
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  If you want to see what they're saying right now in Bangkok or Berlin or whatever
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  You just go click on Berlin, it has every radio station in Berlin
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  You just click on that station and you can hear it live
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  And we feature your show
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  We have a link on our featured show
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  I'm trying to develop a fishing show, a computer show and this
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  And we have you down on Mondays, a link with your phone number to tell everybody to go to y'all
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  And like I said, I thought your interview was fabulous
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  It was right after you did the mask mandate thing, which I was just really impressed with
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  I said, I've got to interview this guy
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  Are you talking about the lawsuit that I filed against the governor?
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  Yeah, yeah, when I heard about that and that's what went on and you were the one responsible
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  And you know, I do, I send everybody when that comes up, I just say, well, hey, here's the guy that did it
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:06.000]  It wasn't the governor, it was Randy Kelton
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  Do you run a broadcast station?
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  I'm not broadcasting 24-7 now
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  I only broadcast when I'm doing an event like, you know, either the Trump boat parade or there's some event and I'll broadcast
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  But I haven't got set up to be doing that
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  But I have a lot of, you know, things going on like I plan to put on a bunch of, you know, I'm doing this all by myself
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  Well, one thing that is going to tell you is you can pull our stream and rebroadcast us
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  Because we're just the producers, we don't broadcast
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Oh, okay
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  So if you want to broadcast it, you can pull it and Deborah has it set up for radio stations
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  So you can take out our ads and replace them with yours and there's a tool to do that automatically
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Oh, okay, I'll tell you what, I'll send you an email with the link and let me get a hold of her
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  Yeah, let's build that up, I'd love to do that
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  Wonderful, okay, thank you for calling
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  Thank you so much, all right
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  Let us know how that goes
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  I will, I'll keep you posted, God bless you all
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  Okeydoke, now we're going to go to another first time caller
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  Have someone in the 574 area code give us a first name and a state
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  Rebecca, Indiana
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  Rebecca? Oh, Rebecca
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  It's not your first time call, is it?
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  Rebecca in Indiana
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  That sounds familiar
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  It sounds familiar because we've been talking on Telegram
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  Yeah
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  Rebecca, are you the one that they, you got accused of disorderly conduct because you made a tumultuous noise
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  Yeah
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  What? You?
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  Or they told you to make a noise and they told you to stop
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  You made a tumultuous noise? Oh my God
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  After being asked
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  What does that mean?
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  What is the code they charge you with?
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  That is one, here let me get my paperwork
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  If I remember correctly, they had, they wrote up the accusation against her using one subsection
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  But then they used the language from another subsection
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  Correct, yeah
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  And so the encouragement to her was to not bring that to the attorney's attention, to the prosecutor's attention
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  Challenge jurisdiction, obviously, but the mismatch here could be enough to get the judge to just dismiss it because that's going to be alleging elements of some different subsection
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  Was the term tumultuous used in either of the codes?
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  In the first code it does, because the code that I'm charged under, which is 354513A1, that engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  Now the wordage that they used says something completely different
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  It says that I recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally made unreasonable noise and continued to do so after being asked to stop
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  Was the noise noise that was being made in furtherance of your First Amendment rights?
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  Good question
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  Was the tumultuous noise you were making say having to do with a picketing or raising some kind of an objection under First Amendment?
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  No, I just
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  Yes, you were raising an objection at that time. Remember there was some lawlessness going on with regards to your husband
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  And when you raised your voice to speak out against that lawlessness, that's when they said your noise was unreasonable
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Right
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  So did they complain about the decibel rating of the noise you made?
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  No
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  Was it extremely loud or was it just objectionable?
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  It was just objectionable in my opinion
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  Were you in a court?
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  No, we were outside. It was a traffic stop
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  Oh, so you spoke back to the officers at a traffic stop?
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  Yes
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  Because they didn't have a lawful reason to pull us over to begin with
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  Oh my goodness
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  Maybe what is it that you say about the peace officers cannot possibly have their peace breached?
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Cannot breach a peace officer's peace
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  You can shout at them as loud as you want to
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  Now you may be able to breach my peace, but not a police officer's
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  Right
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  That's one thing you definitely want to look at
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:08.000]  You can pretty well say anything you want to to a police officer
[01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  He is a professional
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  He has to deal with it
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  The police has also ruled on that too with the city of Houston versus Hill
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  that during a traffic stop you're allowed to state your objections
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  and they're supposed to have self-control
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  and this stuff they didn't
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Have you filed any counter-charges against these guys?
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  It's my position if somebody wants to fight
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  Well, I'll give you one
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  Then we'll talk about that when we come back
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  We'll be right back
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  And her guests discussed the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  For more information please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  Or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  I get it now but then I must
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:23.040]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, we're at Fountain Woodrow Radio and we're talking
[01:17:23.040 --> 01:17:31.640]  to Rebecca in Indiana and trying to figure out what you're actually charged with.
[01:17:31.640 --> 01:17:39.320]  This was a traffic stop, were you accused of any physical activity they objected to?
[01:17:39.320 --> 01:17:40.320]  No.
[01:17:40.320 --> 01:17:43.320]  So it's all verbal?
[01:17:43.320 --> 01:17:44.320]  Correct.
[01:17:44.640 --> 01:17:45.640]  Correct.
[01:17:45.640 --> 01:17:53.520]  Well, I mean, the code that I'm charged under is defined by engaging in fighting or tumultuous
[01:17:53.520 --> 01:18:00.040]  conduct, but the wordage that they used is verbal.
[01:18:00.040 --> 01:18:06.920]  Yeah, that's where the A1 doesn't match the language they quoted from A2, right?
[01:18:06.920 --> 01:18:07.920]  Right.
[01:18:07.920 --> 01:18:25.520]  This is a search for, can you breach an officer's peace by verbally only, by speech only?
[01:18:25.520 --> 01:18:31.320]  Well, let me ask you Rebecca, while he's looking at that, I'm wondering, was there a warrant
[01:18:31.520 --> 01:18:39.880]  or how did the officers even get started on this whole arrest and protective order and
[01:18:39.880 --> 01:18:40.880]  all that stuff?
[01:18:40.880 --> 01:18:46.480]  Did they just know him, recognize him and start causing, you know, just start the encounter
[01:18:46.480 --> 01:18:47.480]  like that?
[01:18:47.480 --> 01:18:57.040]  They, well, as soon as he pulled me over after he followed me for like two miles, he came
[01:18:57.040 --> 01:19:01.480]  up to my window and told me the reason he called me over was because I was riding the
[01:19:01.480 --> 01:19:06.360]  shoulder of the road, which is not even an impractical thing.
[01:19:06.360 --> 01:19:08.040]  Riding the shoulder?
[01:19:08.040 --> 01:19:11.680]  I was riding the shoulder apparently, so I-
[01:19:11.680 --> 01:19:12.680]  What does that mean?
[01:19:12.680 --> 01:19:13.680]  Does that mean-
[01:19:13.680 --> 01:19:15.600]  Did you tell him that's not a thing?
[01:19:15.600 --> 01:19:19.680]  Were you driving on the shoulder or were you just close to it?
[01:19:20.680 --> 01:19:28.520]  Well, apparently according to him, I was riding shoulder and he stated in his statement that
[01:19:28.520 --> 01:19:35.880]  I went off into the grass, but I have obtained the discovery and the video that, the portion
[01:19:35.880 --> 01:19:42.320]  that shows him following me, my vehicle never even gets close to the shoulder.
[01:19:42.320 --> 01:19:49.040]  Ooh, nice perjury, aggravated perjury, because that's a material element.
[01:19:49.040 --> 01:19:50.040]  He's claiming that-
[01:19:50.040 --> 01:19:51.040]  I brought that-
[01:19:51.040 --> 01:19:52.040]  That was his reason.
[01:19:52.040 --> 01:19:53.040]  Yeah.
[01:19:53.040 --> 01:19:57.640]  Well, I brought that up at my last court hearing and the prosecutor says, well, he could have
[01:19:57.640 --> 01:20:03.360]  seen you go off of the road before the video started to record because, and the police
[01:20:03.360 --> 01:20:04.840]  cars, they're-
[01:20:04.840 --> 01:20:09.960]  He didn't allege that he did.
[01:20:09.960 --> 01:20:10.960]  He was caught in a lie.
[01:20:10.960 --> 01:20:13.320]  He doesn't get to change his story later.
[01:20:13.320 --> 01:20:14.320]  Right.
[01:20:15.120 --> 01:20:21.880]  In the probable cause, he says that he observes me go off of the shoulder, but it doesn't
[01:20:21.880 --> 01:20:25.760]  show it in the video that is recorded.
[01:20:25.760 --> 01:20:32.720]  They only record, once they turn their lights on, it's only a 30 seconds prior to the lights
[01:20:32.720 --> 01:20:35.720]  being turned on that's recorded.
[01:20:35.720 --> 01:20:36.720]  Yeah.
[01:20:37.120 --> 01:20:45.160]  Well, that's unfortunate for them that they have literally zero evidence to substantiate
[01:20:45.160 --> 01:20:46.160]  the assertion.
[01:20:46.160 --> 01:20:58.360]  So, back to that, I began contesting the legality of his traffic stop on me and then he just
[01:20:58.360 --> 01:21:05.920]  ordered me out of the vehicle and he claimed Pennsylvania versus Mim as the reason why
[01:21:05.920 --> 01:21:14.480]  I was supposed to be following his lawful orders and to which I contested that I would
[01:21:14.480 --> 01:21:19.880]  have had to have broken the law for him to be giving me a lawful order, but he wasn't
[01:21:19.880 --> 01:21:20.880]  having it.
[01:21:20.880 --> 01:21:26.160]  He threatened me that if I didn't get out of the vehicle that he was going to pull me
[01:21:26.160 --> 01:21:29.160]  out of my vehicle.
[01:21:29.160 --> 01:21:39.080]  So, there's actually a video on this on YouTube on my story as well, but after I get out of
[01:21:39.080 --> 01:21:45.640]  the vehicle, I give him my license registration, he has my husband get out of the vehicle and
[01:21:45.640 --> 01:21:51.880]  he gets his license and he runs our name and there's...
[01:21:51.880 --> 01:21:57.480]  What was his reason for needing to collect evidence from your husband?
[01:21:58.360 --> 01:21:59.360]  Good question.
[01:21:59.360 --> 01:22:03.880]  This is a common practice of these officers around here.
[01:22:03.880 --> 01:22:10.080]  Well, question the common practice and hold it up against the law because from what you're
[01:22:10.080 --> 01:22:15.560]  describing I see no reason for him to...
[01:22:15.560 --> 01:22:20.240]  Basically that violates the constitutions that say nobody should be compelled to give
[01:22:20.240 --> 01:22:22.280]  evidence against themselves.
[01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:23.280]  Right.
[01:22:24.160 --> 01:22:31.280]  This says, Indiana law does not have a specific statute criminalizing speech only offenses
[01:22:31.280 --> 01:22:37.760]  that a police officer's piece does not have case law with it.
[01:22:45.760 --> 01:22:52.360]  Well, after the officer had gotten us out of the vehicle, he brought his canine out
[01:22:52.440 --> 01:23:00.120]  and conducted a quote unquote free air sniff of the vehicle and he had actually told his
[01:23:00.120 --> 01:23:09.200]  dog to spit and then that he put the dog up and then began searching my vehicle.
[01:23:09.200 --> 01:23:15.920]  Okay, and he needs to get charged with legal search, that would be official misconduct
[01:23:15.920 --> 01:23:18.680]  or official oppression depending on the statutes.
[01:23:18.680 --> 01:23:19.680]  Yeah.
[01:23:19.680 --> 01:23:20.680]  Yeah.
[01:23:20.680 --> 01:23:28.080]  Go back after him, who certifies peace officers in Indiana?
[01:23:28.080 --> 01:23:34.280]  I believe this is the sheriff's department.
[01:23:34.280 --> 01:23:41.920]  There'll be something like most states it's called post, police officer certification
[01:23:41.920 --> 01:23:42.920]  and training.
[01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:51.960]  That would probably be the academy that they all go to.
[01:23:51.960 --> 01:23:55.160]  That academy's going to be run by somebody.
[01:23:55.160 --> 01:24:01.000]  The academy has to meet certain requirements which are set up by this, what is in most
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  states post, peace officer standards and training.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:12.160]  They have by statute, they have certain things that the officers have to get trained and
[01:24:12.400 --> 01:24:20.640]  meet certain minimum bar and the training happens at an academy but the academy is responsible
[01:24:20.640 --> 01:24:29.680]  to make sure they meet all the certification, all the characteristics of that training that
[01:24:29.680 --> 01:24:35.560]  are laid out in the statutes.
[01:24:35.560 --> 01:24:43.680]  So there would be some entity like post that sets it up and says here's the minimum bar
[01:24:43.680 --> 01:24:49.160]  and this person would be ineligible if he's a felon or whatever.
[01:24:49.160 --> 01:24:54.360]  They set out all these requirements and then the academy is where the officers would go
[01:24:54.360 --> 01:24:56.840]  to get the training to meet those requirements.
[01:24:56.840 --> 01:25:01.740]  Okay, this says the Indiana Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment protects
[01:25:01.740 --> 01:25:06.940]  peaceful speech in assembly that the government may not criminalize speech solely because
[01:25:06.940 --> 01:25:11.340]  it is unpopular or offensive.
[01:25:11.340 --> 01:25:15.340]  Civil Liberties Union v. Indiana State Police.
[01:25:15.340 --> 01:25:22.340]  Have to look that up to see if it's valid.
[01:25:22.940 --> 01:25:30.940]  So I got that AI and AI is not always reliable.
[01:25:30.940 --> 01:25:35.940]  It's going to be case law, every state is going to have that kind of case law.
[01:25:35.940 --> 01:25:36.940]  Right.
[01:25:36.940 --> 01:25:47.940]  Yeah, AI invents just like lawyers do.
[01:25:47.940 --> 01:25:55.640]  So then, Rebecca, after you were both out of the car and you were compelled to give
[01:25:55.640 --> 01:26:01.060]  evidence against yourself, and then how did this come up about violating a protective
[01:26:01.060 --> 01:26:02.060]  order?
[01:26:02.060 --> 01:26:07.140]  How did that come into play?
[01:26:07.140 --> 01:26:14.260]  Well when our names were ran through their systems, it showed in their system that there
[01:26:14.260 --> 01:26:19.260]  was an active protective order against my husband and I, but they're...
[01:26:19.260 --> 01:26:26.260]  You know that for a factor, is that just what they told you?
[01:26:26.260 --> 01:26:32.260]  I actually went and looked it up after I was released from the scene and it did show that
[01:26:32.260 --> 01:26:38.260]  it was active and it was supposed to have been dismissed two years prior to this.
[01:26:38.260 --> 01:26:45.260]  So the prosecutor's office did not go into their system and update it, dismissing it.
[01:26:45.260 --> 01:26:46.260]  Gotcha.
[01:26:46.260 --> 01:26:51.260]  Okay, well we're just about to go to our sponsors, so hold that thought.
[01:26:51.260 --> 01:26:58.260]  We'll continue on the other side.
[01:27:02.260 --> 01:27:07.760]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps
[01:27:07.760 --> 01:27:11.760]  on growing, but now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:27:11.760 --> 01:27:15.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:27:15.760 --> 01:27:17.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:27:17.760 --> 01:27:20.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:27:20.760 --> 01:27:25.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:27:25.760 --> 01:27:31.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:27:31.760 --> 01:27:33.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:27:33.760 --> 01:27:36.760]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:27:36.760 --> 01:27:40.760]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:27:40.760 --> 01:27:44.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:27:44.760 --> 01:27:47.760]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:27:47.760 --> 01:27:50.760]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:27:50.760 --> 01:27:54.760]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:27:54.760 --> 01:27:58.760]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:27:58.760 --> 01:28:02.760]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:28:02.760 --> 01:28:05.760]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed-out people
[01:28:05.760 --> 01:28:08.760]  have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:28:08.760 --> 01:28:12.760]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas
[01:28:12.760 --> 01:28:14.760]  and regulate our emotions.
[01:28:14.760 --> 01:28:16.760]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:28:16.760 --> 01:28:19.760]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:28:19.760 --> 01:28:22.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com,
[01:28:22.760 --> 01:28:25.760]  the world's most private search engine.
[01:28:26.760 --> 01:28:28.760]  This is Building 7,
[01:28:28.760 --> 01:28:32.760]  a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:28:32.760 --> 01:28:34.760]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:28:34.760 --> 01:28:39.760]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:28:39.760 --> 01:28:42.760]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:28:42.760 --> 01:28:45.760]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:28:45.760 --> 01:28:46.760]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:28:46.760 --> 01:28:47.760]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:28:47.760 --> 01:28:48.760]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:49.760]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:28:49.760 --> 01:28:51.760]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:28:51.760 --> 01:28:52.760]  We're Americans.
[01:28:52.760 --> 01:28:53.760]  And we deserve the truth.
[01:28:53.760 --> 01:28:56.760]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:29:22.760 --> 01:29:24.760]  Thank you.
[01:29:52.760 --> 01:29:54.760]  This is from RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[01:29:54.760 --> 01:29:55.760]  Order your copy today,
[01:29:55.760 --> 01:29:58.760]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:30:01.760 --> 01:30:04.760]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:30:04.760 --> 01:30:07.760]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:30:22.760 --> 01:30:24.760]  Thank you.
[01:30:52.760 --> 01:30:56.760]  OK, we are back at the Kaltenbrit Mountain RuleOfLaw Radio
[01:30:56.760 --> 01:30:59.760]  and talking to Rebecca and his wife.
[01:30:59.760 --> 01:31:00.760]  This is Rebecca.
[01:31:00.760 --> 01:31:01.760]  Yeah.
[01:31:01.760 --> 01:31:04.760]  We've got a couple more callers.
[01:31:04.760 --> 01:31:08.760]  We may not be able to get to everybody with only two segments left, but...
[01:31:08.760 --> 01:31:09.760]  OK.
[01:31:09.760 --> 01:31:12.760]  Rebecca, I've got a case for you.
[01:31:12.760 --> 01:31:13.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:13.760 --> 01:31:14.760]  Here we go.
[01:31:14.760 --> 01:31:15.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:15.760 --> 01:31:16.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:16.760 --> 01:31:17.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:17.760 --> 01:31:18.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:18.760 --> 01:31:19.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:19.760 --> 01:31:20.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:20.760 --> 01:31:21.760]  OK, here we go.
[01:31:21.760 --> 01:31:24.760]  I've got a case here that's either...
[01:31:24.760 --> 01:31:27.760]  it's pretty close to on point,
[01:31:27.760 --> 01:31:30.760]  but even if it's not exactly on point,
[01:31:30.760 --> 01:31:35.760]  you should be able to bounce off of it and find one that is on point.
[01:31:35.760 --> 01:31:43.760]  So what I will do is drop a hyperlink in Telegram channel,
[01:31:43.760 --> 01:31:47.760]  and you pull this up and look at it.
[01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:50.760]  The restraining order.
[01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:55.760]  Is this restraining order restraining your husband from coming in
[01:31:55.760 --> 01:31:59.760]  in a certain distance of view?
[01:31:59.760 --> 01:32:04.760]  Yeah, but this was dismissed two years prior to this stop.
[01:32:04.760 --> 01:32:11.760]  So it wasn't even valid.
[01:32:11.760 --> 01:32:14.760]  The prosecutor's office would drop the ball on that one.
[01:32:14.760 --> 01:32:18.760]  Well, the way I would suggest handling that
[01:32:18.760 --> 01:32:23.760]  is to not really go after the prosecutor for that mess,
[01:32:23.760 --> 01:32:27.760]  but instead have...
[01:32:27.760 --> 01:32:32.760]  if you can get this categorized as fruit of the poisoned tree,
[01:32:32.760 --> 01:32:35.760]  that seems to me like it would be more effective
[01:32:35.760 --> 01:32:37.760]  because the cops didn't have any business
[01:32:37.760 --> 01:32:40.760]  taking somebody who was not behind the wheel
[01:32:40.760 --> 01:32:45.760]  and forcing, compelling them to give evidence of anything,
[01:32:45.760 --> 01:32:47.760]  having a license or whatever.
[01:32:47.760 --> 01:32:50.760]  So they didn't need to ID him.
[01:32:50.760 --> 01:32:51.760]  No.
[01:32:51.760 --> 01:32:57.760]  Once they did, then they didn't really do the wrong thing by saying,
[01:32:57.760 --> 01:33:01.760]  oh, we've got a warrant for his arrest for violating a protective order.
[01:33:01.760 --> 01:33:07.760]  Wow, we need to arrest him because it has a warrant for his arrest.
[01:33:07.760 --> 01:33:09.760]  They didn't do the wrong thing there.
[01:33:09.760 --> 01:33:13.760]  But they never should have gotten that far because they shouldn't have...
[01:33:13.760 --> 01:33:20.760]  Did you tell them that the restraining order had been lifted two years ago?
[01:33:20.760 --> 01:33:23.760]  Yeah, they didn't want to hear anything of it.
[01:33:23.760 --> 01:33:25.760]  Good, you got them.
[01:33:25.760 --> 01:33:28.760]  That's all you needed.
[01:33:28.760 --> 01:33:30.760]  You told them it had been lifted.
[01:33:30.760 --> 01:33:31.760]  It had been lifted.
[01:33:31.760 --> 01:33:34.760]  They didn't do their due diligence.
[01:33:34.760 --> 01:33:38.760]  I have a feeling that was the unreasonable noise they said she was making.
[01:33:38.760 --> 01:33:39.760]  Yes.
[01:33:39.760 --> 01:33:44.760]  Well, yeah, she was being put in handcuffs.
[01:33:44.760 --> 01:33:47.760]  I was in handcuffs at that point myself,
[01:33:47.760 --> 01:33:56.760]  and I just started hollering at them and telling them to look it up in our state.
[01:33:56.760 --> 01:33:58.760]  So that's okay.
[01:33:58.760 --> 01:34:00.760]  And they ignored it.
[01:34:00.760 --> 01:34:03.760]  So that makes the arrest false, both of them.
[01:34:03.760 --> 01:34:07.760]  Wow, and they put you in cuffs too.
[01:34:07.760 --> 01:34:09.760]  That seems kind of excessive.
[01:34:09.760 --> 01:34:10.760]  What's the point?
[01:34:10.760 --> 01:34:15.760]  What were they arresting you for?
[01:34:15.760 --> 01:34:17.760]  The noise?
[01:34:17.760 --> 01:34:21.760]  For telling them that their arrest was improper
[01:34:21.760 --> 01:34:26.760]  and giving them notice that the restraining order had been lifted two years ago
[01:34:26.760 --> 01:34:28.760]  and they didn't check.
[01:34:28.760 --> 01:34:31.760]  That makes them liable.
[01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:36.760]  So they put me in the back of a police car while they destroyed my vehicle
[01:34:36.760 --> 01:34:39.760]  searching for drugs that were never there.
[01:34:39.760 --> 01:34:40.760]  Oh my goodness.
[01:34:40.760 --> 01:34:46.760]  That's also, you sue them for that too because they didn't have grounds to do that.
[01:34:46.760 --> 01:34:47.760]  Well, no, yeah.
[01:34:47.760 --> 01:34:52.760]  I mean, especially after he pulled his K9 out of his vehicle and told it to sit
[01:34:52.760 --> 01:34:59.760]  and then it indicated that there was the presence of drugs in the vehicle.
[01:34:59.760 --> 01:35:02.760]  He'd go after these guys criminally.
[01:35:02.760 --> 01:35:05.760]  Yeah.
[01:35:05.760 --> 01:35:06.760]  Take them on.
[01:35:06.760 --> 01:35:07.760]  That's the only way.
[01:35:07.760 --> 01:35:12.760]  The only way you're going to win this is to raise the stakes.
[01:35:12.760 --> 01:35:13.760]  Yeah.
[01:35:13.760 --> 01:35:18.760]  Well, now the prosecutor is retaliating against me over this as well
[01:35:18.760 --> 01:35:24.760]  because of the YouTube video that was posted on my story.
[01:35:24.760 --> 01:35:26.760]  In what way?
[01:35:26.760 --> 01:35:28.760]  Retaliating how?
[01:35:28.760 --> 01:35:31.760]  He was a little upset.
[01:35:31.760 --> 01:35:36.760]  The YouTube creator was in the last court hearing
[01:35:36.760 --> 01:35:39.760]  and he had a recording device on him
[01:35:39.760 --> 01:35:45.760]  and he had tried to record what the prosecutor was telling me.
[01:35:45.760 --> 01:35:52.760]  And on there is some pretty damning evidence I could say that
[01:35:52.760 --> 01:35:58.760]  the prosecutor admits that they just go file charges on people
[01:35:58.760 --> 01:36:01.760]  without actually looking at all the evidence.
[01:36:01.760 --> 01:36:02.760]  Wow.
[01:36:02.760 --> 01:36:04.760]  And he was a little upset about that.
[01:36:04.760 --> 01:36:09.760]  So at my most recent hearing, which was a pretrial conference,
[01:36:09.760 --> 01:36:15.760]  he basically told me that because of that video, I was only given two options.
[01:36:15.760 --> 01:36:19.760]  Either take the plea or take it to trial.
[01:36:19.760 --> 01:36:27.760]  Take it to trial and need to really go back after the prosecutor.
[01:36:27.760 --> 01:36:29.760]  Charge him with retaliation.
[01:36:29.760 --> 01:36:34.760]  Charge him with official oppression.
[01:36:34.760 --> 01:36:40.760]  Go after him criminally and bargrieve him into the Stone Age.
[01:36:40.760 --> 01:36:41.760]  Exactly.
[01:36:41.760 --> 01:36:44.760]  And file a subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[01:36:44.760 --> 01:36:47.760]  that the officers did not have probable cause.
[01:36:47.760 --> 01:36:48.760]  They saw the warrant.
[01:36:48.760 --> 01:36:54.760]  Once it had been given notice that it had been lifted two years earlier,
[01:36:54.760 --> 01:36:56.760]  they had a duty to check.
[01:36:56.760 --> 01:36:58.760]  And they didn't.
[01:36:58.760 --> 01:37:03.760]  And it sounds like this all sounds like nonsense.
[01:37:03.760 --> 01:37:05.760]  It is. It really is.
[01:37:05.760 --> 01:37:08.760]  So what are they prosecuting your husband for?
[01:37:08.760 --> 01:37:12.760]  Nothing. He spent the rest of the weekend in jail
[01:37:12.760 --> 01:37:16.760]  and I had to go up to the prosecutor's office that Monday morning
[01:37:16.760 --> 01:37:22.760]  and basically holler at them and tell them that they dropped the ball
[01:37:22.760 --> 01:37:26.760]  and didn't update their...
[01:37:26.760 --> 01:37:30.760]  That needs to get false imprisonment sued against the prosecutor.
[01:37:30.760 --> 01:37:32.760]  Yeah. He caused it.
[01:37:32.760 --> 01:37:39.760]  That's one of the things for which every jurisdiction has waived its sovereign immunity.
[01:37:39.760 --> 01:37:41.760]  Yeah.
[01:37:41.760 --> 01:37:46.760]  That'll raise the stakes. Now you got something to deal with.
[01:37:46.760 --> 01:37:48.760]  Right.
[01:37:48.760 --> 01:37:50.760]  Yeah, he...
[01:37:50.760 --> 01:37:53.760]  I don't know. I would say she already had something to deal with.
[01:37:53.760 --> 01:37:55.760]  She could deal with each part of that.
[01:37:55.760 --> 01:37:58.760]  From the stop, from the very beginning of the stop,
[01:37:58.760 --> 01:38:01.760]  there was no probable cause to pull her over in the first place.
[01:38:01.760 --> 01:38:03.760]  Riding the shoulder is not a thing.
[01:38:03.760 --> 01:38:08.760]  If she was close to the edge, but she wasn't driving all over the edge,
[01:38:08.760 --> 01:38:11.760]  she was just close to it, that's fine.
[01:38:11.760 --> 01:38:12.760]  Right.
[01:38:12.760 --> 01:38:14.760]  That's not a reason to pull somebody over.
[01:38:14.760 --> 01:38:16.760]  No.
[01:38:16.760 --> 01:38:20.760]  And then demanding ID from somebody that's not behind the wheel
[01:38:20.760 --> 01:38:22.760]  and then using that against them.
[01:38:22.760 --> 01:38:24.760]  Yeah.
[01:38:24.760 --> 01:38:30.760]  This is a pretty common practice of this one particular officer during his shift.
[01:38:30.760 --> 01:38:34.760]  This is pretty much what he does just about every traffic stop in Lake.
[01:38:34.760 --> 01:38:36.760]  Okay.
[01:38:36.760 --> 01:38:39.760]  Why are you guys letting him do that?
[01:38:39.760 --> 01:38:40.760]  Right.
[01:38:40.760 --> 01:38:46.760]  Because they rely on all the citizens around here that don't know their rights.
[01:38:46.760 --> 01:38:48.760]  They rely on the ignorant people.
[01:38:48.760 --> 01:38:52.760]  You only need to know your rights.
[01:38:52.760 --> 01:38:53.760]  Right.
[01:38:53.760 --> 01:38:56.760]  Last time I got pulled over,
[01:38:56.760 --> 01:39:03.760]  the officer decided since he caught me at 55 and a 35, 20 over,
[01:39:03.760 --> 01:39:08.760]  I was close to a 45 and that would only put me five over.
[01:39:08.760 --> 01:39:09.760]  So I'm going to cut you a break.
[01:39:09.760 --> 01:39:11.760]  Don't cut me a break.
[01:39:11.760 --> 01:39:15.760]  You hold me to rule of law because I'm going to hold you to it.
[01:39:15.760 --> 01:39:19.760]  I could not force him to write me a ticket.
[01:39:19.760 --> 01:39:21.760]  No.
[01:39:21.760 --> 01:39:22.760]  Reason?
[01:39:22.760 --> 01:39:27.760]  Last time they wrote me a ticket, I'd landed on them like a ton of bricks.
[01:39:27.760 --> 01:39:28.760]  Yeah.
[01:39:28.760 --> 01:39:29.760]  Same here.
[01:39:29.760 --> 01:39:30.760]  Straight.
[01:39:30.760 --> 01:39:32.760]  It cost them a lot.
[01:39:32.760 --> 01:39:36.760]  They dismissed that other ticket and I told the clerk,
[01:39:36.760 --> 01:39:38.760]  I went in and said, when's my next hearing day?
[01:39:38.760 --> 01:39:40.760]  Oh, they dismissed that two weeks ago.
[01:39:40.760 --> 01:39:41.760]  What do you mean they dismissed it?
[01:39:41.760 --> 01:39:43.760]  They can't dismiss it.
[01:39:43.760 --> 01:39:47.760]  Well, what they did, you tell that prosecutor he's a chicken shit.
[01:39:47.760 --> 01:39:49.760]  And she said, I can't tell him that.
[01:39:49.760 --> 01:39:53.760]  Yeah, you can.
[01:39:53.760 --> 01:39:56.760]  This is what happens when you go back after them.
[01:39:56.760 --> 01:39:57.760]  Yeah.
[01:39:57.760 --> 01:40:00.760]  Look at everything they do.
[01:40:00.760 --> 01:40:04.760]  If it looks, if it seems wrong, it probably is.
[01:40:04.760 --> 01:40:08.760]  Get your criminal procedure code for Indiana and read it twice.
[01:40:08.760 --> 01:40:10.760]  Yep.
[01:40:10.760 --> 01:40:12.760]  Not near as big as you think it is.
[01:40:12.760 --> 01:40:15.760]  You read it the first time, it's not going to make sense.
[01:40:15.760 --> 01:40:16.760]  So don't try to understand all of it.
[01:40:16.760 --> 01:40:18.760]  Just read through it.
[01:40:18.760 --> 01:40:23.760]  All you're doing the first time is laying down mental markers.
[01:40:23.760 --> 01:40:27.760]  Read it the second time and you'll start stitching all these pieces together.
[01:40:27.760 --> 01:40:34.760]  Know their codes better than they do.
[01:40:34.760 --> 01:40:35.760]  Okay.
[01:40:35.760 --> 01:40:36.760]  We need to go to other callers.
[01:40:36.760 --> 01:40:42.760]  I put a link in a telegram for you.
[01:40:42.760 --> 01:40:44.760]  Okay.
[01:40:44.760 --> 01:40:45.760]  Okay.
[01:40:45.760 --> 01:40:46.760]  Thank you.
[01:40:46.760 --> 01:40:49.760]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:40:49.760 --> 01:40:55.760]  We've got three callers left and only one segment.
[01:40:55.760 --> 01:40:58.760]  So we'll be right back.
[01:41:25.760 --> 01:41:28.760]  Okay.
[01:41:28.760 --> 01:41:29.760]  Thank you.
[01:41:55.760 --> 01:41:57.760]  We'll be right back.
[01:42:25.760 --> 01:42:27.760]  Thank you.
[01:42:55.760 --> 01:42:59.760]  Call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:25.760 --> 01:43:53.760]  Okay.
[01:43:53.760 --> 01:43:54.760]  We are back.
[01:43:54.760 --> 01:43:56.760]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:56.760 --> 01:43:59.760]  And we're going to Alex in California.
[01:43:59.760 --> 01:44:02.760]  Hello, Alex.
[01:44:02.760 --> 01:44:03.760]  Hey, Randy.
[01:44:03.760 --> 01:44:04.760]  Hey, Brett.
[01:44:04.760 --> 01:44:05.760]  Good evening.
[01:44:05.760 --> 01:44:08.760]  Just one question.
[01:44:08.760 --> 01:44:22.760]  The Young Doctrine, it only allows for injunctive relief if you sue an official in their individual capacity.
[01:44:22.760 --> 01:44:23.760]  Okay.
[01:44:23.760 --> 01:44:36.760]  18 U.S. Code 242 allows you to sue them in their personal capacity for damages.
[01:44:36.760 --> 01:44:43.760]  How does that code lead to that conclusion if you just take that code?
[01:44:43.760 --> 01:44:44.760]  I'm familiar with it.
[01:44:44.760 --> 01:44:47.760]  Oh, 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:44:47.760 --> 01:44:48.760]  I'm sorry.
[01:44:48.760 --> 01:44:49.760]  Do you mean the...
[01:44:49.760 --> 01:44:50.760]  42 U.S. Code 1983.
[01:44:50.760 --> 01:44:51.760]  Yeah.
[01:44:51.760 --> 01:44:52.760]  Well...
[01:44:52.760 --> 01:44:55.760]  My bad.
[01:44:55.760 --> 01:45:00.760]  The argument that I'm getting is that, first of all, I need to get around judicial immunity.
[01:45:00.760 --> 01:45:08.760]  Then they come with the 11th Amendment, which also reads completely different because they're
[01:45:08.760 --> 01:45:11.760]  asserting that I can't sue my own state.
[01:45:11.760 --> 01:45:13.760]  But the 11th Amendment actually reads differently.
[01:45:13.760 --> 01:45:19.760]  But the whole thing is based on hands versus Louisiana, which I don't know if you're familiar
[01:45:19.760 --> 01:45:22.760]  with that, but that's another issue.
[01:45:22.760 --> 01:45:29.760]  But the Young Doctrine, which is just one of the questions, that would allow to sue
[01:45:29.760 --> 01:45:33.760]  an individual capacity, but only for injunctive relief.
[01:45:33.760 --> 01:45:34.760]  Yeah.
[01:45:34.760 --> 01:45:35.760]  I kind of...
[01:45:35.760 --> 01:45:39.760]  When you said that, I kind of remember reading that, and I'd lost track that that was in
[01:45:39.760 --> 01:45:40.760]  there.
[01:45:40.760 --> 01:45:43.760]  So you're right.
[01:45:43.760 --> 01:45:44.760]  Mark that down.
[01:45:45.760 --> 01:45:52.760]  She caught me misciting an important code.
[01:45:52.760 --> 01:46:03.760]  I'll have to go back through my lawsuit to see where I got the restriction from...
[01:46:03.760 --> 01:46:13.760]  I was using the Young Doctrine to restrict them from providing legal counsel, state-paid
[01:46:13.760 --> 01:46:14.760]  counsel.
[01:46:14.760 --> 01:46:19.760]  By that, I think you mean the Ex Parte Young, right?
[01:46:19.760 --> 01:46:20.760]  Yeah.
[01:46:20.760 --> 01:46:24.760]  Because there's also Younger Doctrine that they use to set...
[01:46:24.760 --> 01:46:26.760]  But it's different.
[01:46:26.760 --> 01:46:28.760]  You're saying Ex Parte Young, correct?
[01:46:28.760 --> 01:46:29.760]  Yes.
[01:46:29.760 --> 01:46:30.760]  Yes, correct.
[01:46:30.760 --> 01:46:49.760]  Okay, there's one that goes to the Supremacy Clause that doesn't allow the state to indemnify
[01:46:49.760 --> 01:46:53.760]  public officials sued in their private capacity in the federal court.
[01:46:53.760 --> 01:46:54.760]  Yeah.
[01:46:54.760 --> 01:46:55.760]  That's Ex Parte Young.
[01:46:55.760 --> 01:47:01.760]  Yeah, but this one allows you to sue them for money.
[01:47:01.760 --> 01:47:05.760]  I'm too tired to think good.
[01:47:05.760 --> 01:47:06.760]  Okay, straight.
[01:47:06.760 --> 01:47:07.760]  I looked that up.
[01:47:07.760 --> 01:47:09.760]  Let me look that up in the morning.
[01:47:09.760 --> 01:47:10.760]  Tomorrow.
[01:47:10.760 --> 01:47:11.760]  I'm trying to...
[01:47:11.760 --> 01:47:19.760]  I'm sitting here trying to think of how to form the question, and my brain is going blank.
[01:47:19.760 --> 01:47:20.760]  No worries.
[01:47:20.760 --> 01:47:21.760]  No worries.
[01:47:21.760 --> 01:47:24.760]  I can call back tomorrow with that.
[01:47:24.760 --> 01:47:29.760]  I have more questions, too, and I need to give other callers as well.
[01:47:29.760 --> 01:47:34.760]  Well, and maybe just also tell us what you found that says injunctive only.
[01:47:34.760 --> 01:47:36.760]  Where can we read about that?
[01:47:36.760 --> 01:47:38.760]  That's in the Young Doctrine.
[01:47:38.760 --> 01:47:42.760]  I do remember reading that.
[01:47:42.760 --> 01:47:43.760]  That is in...
[01:47:43.760 --> 01:47:46.760]  I think that's when they...
[01:47:46.760 --> 01:47:53.760]  There was this issue that led to the Ex Parte Young, where he sued, I think, the governor
[01:47:53.760 --> 01:48:00.760]  or something, but that case law came up with this doctrine that they then started calling,
[01:48:00.760 --> 01:48:09.760]  and then they determined, well, you can sue your own state, but only for injunctive relief.
[01:48:09.760 --> 01:48:10.760]  Oh, okay.
[01:48:10.760 --> 01:48:13.760]  The state you can only sue for injunctive relief.
[01:48:13.760 --> 01:48:16.760]  You can't sue the state for harm.
[01:48:16.760 --> 01:48:18.760]  I'm sorry.
[01:48:18.760 --> 01:48:20.760]  Because they're a sovereign.
[01:48:20.760 --> 01:48:22.760]  Maybe I'm getting confused.
[01:48:22.760 --> 01:48:24.760]  Hold on.
[01:48:24.760 --> 01:48:25.760]  Yeah, you were...
[01:48:25.760 --> 01:48:29.760]  Oh, then I'm the one who's confused.
[01:48:29.760 --> 01:48:30.760]  Right.
[01:48:30.760 --> 01:48:32.760]  I remember reading the injunctive.
[01:48:32.760 --> 01:48:36.760]  I just don't have it in my head exactly how that works.
[01:48:36.760 --> 01:48:43.760]  Yeah, I've seen those provisions about injunction, but it didn't say that the people couldn't
[01:48:43.760 --> 01:48:50.760]  be sued, like, in their personal capacity.
[01:48:50.760 --> 01:48:57.760]  It was just saying that the office or the state was talking about that.
[01:48:57.760 --> 01:49:00.760]  I don't know.
[01:49:00.760 --> 01:49:09.760]  It says Ex Parte Young was 48, and the numbers don't look right.
[01:49:09.760 --> 01:49:12.760]  209, U.S. 123.
[01:49:12.760 --> 01:49:15.760]  Yeah, that wasn't what the...
[01:49:15.760 --> 01:49:18.760]  Showed me some numbers, and that wasn't what it was.
[01:49:18.760 --> 01:49:21.760]  Oh, you got AI telling you some numbers, just making them up, right?
[01:49:21.760 --> 01:49:22.760]  No, I went into...
[01:49:22.760 --> 01:49:24.760]  That's what the lawyers do.
[01:49:24.760 --> 01:49:33.760]  I went into Ex Parte Young, or 18 Southwest, 824.
[01:49:33.760 --> 01:49:34.760]  That's the wrong one.
[01:49:34.760 --> 01:49:37.760]  There must be another Ex Parte Young.
[01:49:37.760 --> 01:49:40.760]  Yeah, go look at 209, U.S. 123.
[01:49:40.760 --> 01:49:41.760]  There it is.
[01:49:41.760 --> 01:49:42.760]  There it is.
[01:49:42.760 --> 01:49:45.760]  209, that's 123.
[01:49:45.760 --> 01:49:49.760]  So this is what I'm reading right now.
[01:49:49.760 --> 01:49:56.760]  Sovereign immunity does not prevent people whom the law harms from suing those officials
[01:49:56.760 --> 01:50:00.760]  in their individual capacity for injunctive relief.
[01:50:00.760 --> 01:50:06.760]  So this is related to the individual capacity.
[01:50:06.760 --> 01:50:09.760]  But it only allows for injunctive.
[01:50:09.760 --> 01:50:11.760]  Well, who's saying that?
[01:50:11.760 --> 01:50:20.760]  Is that in the actual judicial opinion in 1908, or is that some blogger saying that
[01:50:20.760 --> 01:50:21.760]  today?
[01:50:21.760 --> 01:50:27.760]  No, that is in the opinion, according to justia.com.
[01:50:27.760 --> 01:50:28.760]  Okay.
[01:50:28.760 --> 01:50:31.760]  You probably know this website.
[01:50:31.760 --> 01:50:37.760]  Yeah, that's a very useful site.
[01:50:37.760 --> 01:50:47.760]  Just do a word search in there and use individual capacity, and you'll get right there.
[01:50:47.760 --> 01:50:49.760]  Okay.
[01:50:49.760 --> 01:50:57.760]  Okay, I'll have to study this in the morning.
[01:50:57.760 --> 01:51:00.760]  I've got the case up, I'll study it and figure that out.
[01:51:00.760 --> 01:51:01.760]  And I will find...
[01:51:02.760 --> 01:51:11.760]  This is something I have to find, so when I sue the next time, the Supremacy Clause,
[01:51:11.760 --> 01:51:23.760]  the prohibition against providing indemnity for public official suit in their individual
[01:51:23.760 --> 01:51:24.760]  capacity.
[01:51:24.760 --> 01:51:25.760]  I need to pull my suit back out.
[01:51:25.760 --> 01:51:26.760]  It's all in there.
[01:51:26.760 --> 01:51:28.760]  I'm just going to have to go find it.
[01:51:28.760 --> 01:51:35.760]  Do you mean the Supremacy Clause, like the Federal Constitution, Article 6, Section 2?
[01:51:35.760 --> 01:51:36.760]  Yeah.
[01:51:36.760 --> 01:51:43.760]  That the Constitution and the laws made in person...
[01:51:43.760 --> 01:51:51.760]  What this said was, if a state attempts to indemnify a state official, sued in their
[01:51:51.760 --> 01:52:00.760]  individual capacity for violating a federal law or a tenet of the Federal Constitution,
[01:52:00.760 --> 01:52:08.760]  that that would violate the Supremacy Clause, that that would help the state individual
[01:52:08.760 --> 01:52:11.760]  violate federal law.
[01:52:11.760 --> 01:52:16.760]  So it forbade them from doing it, but I don't have in my head exactly what case that's out
[01:52:16.760 --> 01:52:17.760]  of.
[01:52:17.760 --> 01:52:21.760]  I'll have to look back in my lawsuit to find it.
[01:52:21.760 --> 01:52:25.760]  But you mean the Supremacy Clause of the Federal Constitution?
[01:52:25.760 --> 01:52:26.760]  Yes.
[01:52:26.760 --> 01:52:30.760]  The Federal Constitution is supreme.
[01:52:30.760 --> 01:52:38.760]  You cannot indemnify your state officials from violating a federal law, or it violates
[01:52:38.760 --> 01:52:41.760]  the Supremacy of the Federal Constitution.
[01:52:41.760 --> 01:52:44.760]  That's what they're saying.
[01:52:44.760 --> 01:52:46.760]  So I have the Supremacy Clause pulled up.
[01:52:46.760 --> 01:52:49.760]  There is no indemnify in there.
[01:52:49.760 --> 01:52:50.760]  No, there isn't.
[01:52:50.760 --> 01:52:53.760]  The Supremacy Clause is supreme.
[01:52:53.760 --> 01:52:55.760]  It is supreme.
[01:52:55.760 --> 01:53:00.760]  It doesn't say, it doesn't tell you all the case law below it.
[01:53:00.760 --> 01:53:02.760]  It says the federal law is supreme.
[01:53:02.760 --> 01:53:09.760]  If state law tries to help a state official bypass or violate the federal law, they're
[01:53:09.760 --> 01:53:11.760]  violating that supremacy.
[01:53:11.760 --> 01:53:14.760]  How do you really feel about that, Randy?
[01:53:14.760 --> 01:53:15.760]  I'm tired.
[01:53:15.760 --> 01:53:16.760]  I'm sorry, I'm just tired.
[01:53:16.760 --> 01:53:18.760]  It's not in this.
[01:53:18.760 --> 01:53:21.760]  The Supremacy Clause makes it supreme.
[01:53:21.760 --> 01:53:29.760]  The states, by indemnifying their public officials, when they violate the supreme law, then they
[01:53:29.760 --> 01:53:34.760]  further violation of the supreme law of the land.
[01:53:34.760 --> 01:53:36.760]  And they're saying that violates the Supremacy Clause.
[01:53:36.760 --> 01:53:40.760]  But I don't have the statutes in my head right now.
[01:53:40.760 --> 01:53:41.760]  Okay.
[01:53:42.760 --> 01:53:45.760]  I'm sorry, I'm just tired.
[01:53:45.760 --> 01:53:47.760]  I've been up since 2 this morning.
[01:53:47.760 --> 01:53:48.760]  No worries, Randy.
[01:53:48.760 --> 01:53:50.760]  I'll call back tomorrow.
[01:53:50.760 --> 01:53:53.760]  Thank you.
[01:53:53.760 --> 01:54:01.760]  When one of these public officials does something that's against the Constitution, he is stripped
[01:54:01.760 --> 01:54:07.760]  of his official or representative character.
[01:54:07.760 --> 01:54:10.760]  He gets stripped right then.
[01:54:10.760 --> 01:54:15.760]  He is personally liable to his individual consequences.
[01:54:15.760 --> 01:54:21.760]  Whatever he did, his conduct that you're challenging, he has consequences individually
[01:54:21.760 --> 01:54:22.760]  for that.
[01:54:22.760 --> 01:54:25.760]  That's what I'm saying.
[01:54:25.760 --> 01:54:31.760]  I don't see how that's only an injunction only.
[01:54:31.760 --> 01:54:32.760]  Was there something else?
[01:54:32.760 --> 01:54:39.760]  Yes, injunction is appropriate, but so is a declaratory judgment, and so is monetary
[01:54:39.760 --> 01:54:41.760]  damages, if that's the case.
[01:54:41.760 --> 01:54:47.760]  Monetary damages is exactly what 42 years ago in 1983 is for.
[01:54:47.760 --> 01:54:48.760]  Right.
[01:54:48.760 --> 01:54:51.760]  And who is it, Brady?
[01:54:51.760 --> 01:54:56.760]  Brady is the primary case that authorizes that.
[01:54:56.760 --> 01:55:02.760]  Yeah, then they come with immunity, with their stupid immunity doctrine.
[01:55:02.760 --> 01:55:04.760]  Go ahead.
[01:55:04.760 --> 01:55:08.760]  They claim immunity in Texas, but there is none.
[01:55:08.760 --> 01:55:10.760]  They claim it anyway.
[01:55:10.760 --> 01:55:18.760]  Mine and the Fed got past the immunity arguments.
[01:55:18.760 --> 01:55:28.760]  The Attorney General cited Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 104.001, and it said the
[01:55:28.760 --> 01:55:35.760]  state shall indemnify public officials sued in their profession.
[01:55:35.760 --> 01:55:39.760]  It didn't say immunites.
[01:55:39.760 --> 01:55:40.760]  Exactly.
[01:55:40.760 --> 01:55:41.760]  We're out of time.
[01:55:41.760 --> 01:55:42.760]  Be back tomorrow night.
[01:55:42.760 --> 01:55:45.760]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Life Radio.
[01:55:45.760 --> 01:55:48.760]  Thank you for listening, and good night.
[01:55:48.760 --> 01:55:55.760]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:55:55.760 --> 01:55:56.760]  Recovery Version.
[01:55:56.760 --> 01:56:01.760]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:56:01.760 --> 01:56:06.760]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:56:06.760 --> 01:56:10.760]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:56:10.760 --> 01:56:19.760]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:56:19.760 --> 01:56:24.760]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:56:24.760 --> 01:56:28.760]  charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:56:28.760 --> 01:56:31.760]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:56:31.760 --> 01:56:39.760]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:56:39.760 --> 01:56:47.760]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:56:47.760 --> 01:56:56.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:56:59.760 --> 01:57:04.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:57:04.760 --> 01:57:08.760]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:57:08.760 --> 01:57:09.760]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:57:09.760 --> 01:57:13.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:57:13.760 --> 01:57:15.760]  your First Amendment rights.
[01:57:15.760 --> 01:57:17.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:57:17.760 --> 01:57:20.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:57:20.760 --> 01:57:25.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:27.760]  So protect your rights.
[01:57:27.760 --> 01:57:31.760]  Don't say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:57:31.760 --> 01:57:33.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:57:33.760 --> 01:57:38.760]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[01:57:38.760 --> 01:57:41.760]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:57:41.760 --> 01:57:44.760]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:57:44.760 --> 01:57:46.760]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[01:57:46.760 --> 01:57:50.760]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[01:57:50.760 --> 01:57:53.760]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[01:57:53.760 --> 01:58:00.760]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:58:00.760 --> 01:58:02.760]  and R for religion.
[01:58:02.760 --> 01:58:06.760]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:58:06.760 --> 01:58:07.760]  assembly, and religion.
[01:58:07.760 --> 01:58:09.760]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:58:09.760 --> 01:58:13.760]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:58:13.760 --> 01:58:17.760]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:58:17.760 --> 01:58:20.760]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:58:20.760 --> 01:58:21.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:58:21.760 --> 01:58:30.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:58:30.760 --> 01:58:33.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:58:33.760 --> 01:58:37.760]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:58:37.760 --> 01:58:38.760]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:58:38.760 --> 01:58:42.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:58:42.760 --> 01:58:45.760]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:58:45.760 --> 01:58:47.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:58:47.760 --> 01:58:50.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:58:50.760 --> 01:58:55.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:58:55.760 --> 01:59:00.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:59:00.760 --> 01:59:03.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:59:03.760 --> 01:59:07.760]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:59:07.760 --> 01:59:10.760]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:59:10.760 --> 01:59:14.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:59:14.760 --> 01:59:18.760]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[01:59:19.760 --> 01:59:21.760]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:59:21.760 --> 01:59:25.760]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[01:59:25.760 --> 01:59:29.760]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:59:29.760 --> 01:59:30.760]  Get it?
[01:59:30.760 --> 01:59:32.760]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[01:59:32.760 --> 01:59:36.760]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[01:59:36.760 --> 01:59:41.760]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[01:59:41.760 --> 01:59:46.760]  government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America,
[01:59:46.760 --> 01:59:49.760]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:59:49.760 --> 01:59:51.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:59:51.760 --> 01:59:54.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:00:16.760 --> 02:00:18.760]  Thank you.
[02:00:46.760 --> 02:00:48.760]  Thank you.
[02:01:16.760 --> 02:01:18.760]  Thank you.
[02:01:47.760 --> 02:01:49.760]  All right, good evening, friends, and welcome.
[02:01:49.760 --> 02:01:54.760]  It is time for INN World Report Radio here on the Great Logos Radio Network.
[02:01:54.760 --> 02:01:56.760]  My name is Tom Kiley.
[02:01:56.760 --> 02:02:00.760]  I have the distinct honor to bring this show to you here on Thursday.