ROL_2024-10-25_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:29.360]  ["Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Whatcha Gonna Do?" playing in the background.]
[00:29.360 --> 00:41.600]  Okay. Howdy, howdy. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this, the 25th day of October, 2024.
[00:41.600 --> 00:53.120]  And we're going to turn the call lines on. And if anybody calls in, make sure you tell Brett about all the nice stuff we said about him when he wasn't here.
[00:54.120 --> 00:59.120]  Don't anybody mention roast. That's not to be part of the verbiage.
[00:59.120 --> 01:11.120]  Well, as I understand it, you were going to try to have a Brett roast, but then for some reason there was like an act of God and you lost your fiber optic connection.
[01:11.120 --> 01:14.120]  Yeah, there was that. There was that.
[01:14.120 --> 01:29.120]  Okay, so no Brett roast. Okay. I did want to have an argument with Brett about arraignments.
[01:29.120 --> 01:40.120]  When considering arraignments, and I'm looking at Chapter 28, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:40.120 --> 02:01.120]  Let me open that up. The prosecutors are eliminating Speedy Trial Act and forcing people to come back repeatedly to court over and over and over until they finally give up and make a deal.
[02:01.120 --> 02:04.120]  Yeah.
[02:04.120 --> 02:10.120]  And I'm looking at how do they get that done? How can we interrupt that?
[02:10.120 --> 02:21.120]  It appears as though Chapter 28, traffic tickets, we've got a special thing for it, but Chapter 28 says,
[02:41.120 --> 02:51.120]  And they use that. They say we set this for conferencing. So we want to confer with you to see if you want to make a deal yet. However, there's more.
[02:51.120 --> 03:01.120]  The defendant must be present at the arraignment and his presence is required during any pretrial proceeding.
[03:01.120 --> 03:15.120]  The pretrial hearing shall be to determine any of the following matters. So this meeting and conference is limited to the following.
[03:15.120 --> 03:22.120]  Very specific purposes and intent of the legislature on why there's a meeting.
[03:22.120 --> 03:39.120]  Yes. And the first one is an arraignment. So before we get too hung up on that, let's go have a look at 2601 and see if we can figure this one out.
[03:39.120 --> 03:52.120]  2601, in all felony cases after indictment and all misdemeanor cases punishable by imprisonment, there shall be an arraignment.
[03:52.120 --> 04:04.120]  Now, why did the legislature do that? They authorized an arraignment, but they left out Class C misdemeanor.
[04:04.120 --> 04:16.120]  They didn't just say in all felony and misdemeanor cases there shall be an arraignment. They went to great trouble to exclude Class C misdemeanors.
[04:16.120 --> 04:27.120]  So we have to assume they had a reason for doing that. And if they had intended that arraignments be held in a Class C misdemeanor,
[04:27.120 --> 04:35.120]  they would have said in all felony cases after indictment and all misdemeanors, there shall be an arraignment.
[04:35.120 --> 04:46.120]  But they had it in that subordinate clause. In all misdemeanor cases punishable by imprisonment, they limited the misdemeanor.
[04:46.120 --> 04:49.120]  That knocks out the Class C ones.
[04:49.120 --> 04:58.120]  What I'm saying is, is Wendy, I get a notice to appear from the police officer.
[04:58.120 --> 05:09.120]  It creates kind of a conundrum. What can they call me to court for other than trial?
[05:09.120 --> 05:22.120]  And I guess that's kind of reasonable because the Texas Open Records Act, while it has been overturned,
[05:22.120 --> 05:32.120]  in the preamble to the Texas Open Records Act, the legislature stated its legislative intent.
[05:32.120 --> 05:43.120]  I should have had that up in front of me. But it says that if a Class C misdemeanor is brought to trial within 30 days,
[05:43.120 --> 05:52.120]  it is presumed to be speedy. 60 days for Class B misdemeanor, 90 for Class A, and 120 for felony.
[05:52.120 --> 06:04.120]  I think that can be useful all by itself, even though that whole thing didn't get passed as whatever other related issue they were trying to address.
[06:04.120 --> 06:12.120]  That in itself, since it stood on its own, that gives a window into their thinking.
[06:12.120 --> 06:14.120]  Legislative intent.
[06:14.120 --> 06:17.120]  It has to be honored by judges.
[06:17.120 --> 06:32.120]  Before anything else, legislative intent has to be considered. On a statute, you can go back and get the arguments from the House and Senate floor
[06:32.120 --> 06:42.120]  that made by the different legislators and bring those into court to establish legislative intent.
[06:42.120 --> 06:49.120]  It is the duty of the court to enforce not what the code says.
[06:49.120 --> 06:56.120]  The code, you know, we have people say, oh, we had Ralph Winterwood, but may he rest in peace.
[06:56.120 --> 07:03.120]  He said, oh, the statutes don't apply. I had a friend of mine, Art Patton, call me.
[07:03.120 --> 07:13.120]  He had tuned into my show and he said he heard two of his favorite people on Earth on the radio at the same time.
[07:13.120 --> 07:19.120]  He and Ralph Winterwood. I said, oh, you heard that, Art? Yeah, I heard that.
[07:19.120 --> 07:24.120]  You were crawling down Ralph's throat. Yeah, as a matter of fact, I was.
[07:24.120 --> 07:29.120]  He got on my show and he said, oh, the statutes don't apply.
[07:29.120 --> 07:36.120]  And so the statutes don't apply, Ralph. And what does apply? Oh, you have to go to the National Register.
[07:36.120 --> 07:42.120]  Well, that's really nice, Ralph. That's about 65,000 pages.
[07:42.120 --> 07:47.120]  You want to be a little more specific? Oh, you just have to go to the National Register.
[07:47.120 --> 07:57.120]  Well, he was right. The statutes are not laws. The codes are not laws.
[07:57.120 --> 08:07.120]  What's in the National Register, that's what the law is. What the legislature actually passed, that's what the law is.
[08:07.120 --> 08:19.120]  Then because the laws are put into the National Register when they're passed, they're not in any kind of logical order.
[08:19.120 --> 08:27.120]  That's a giant jumble. Yeah, so Ralph is asking everybody to go to the National Register and find all the applicable laws.
[08:27.120 --> 08:37.120]  Well, good luck with that. So the legislature contracted with a publisher and asked the publisher to go into the National Register
[08:37.120 --> 08:47.120]  and separate all of the laws into like logical kinds and then publish those into codes and statutes.
[08:47.120 --> 08:52.120]  And then those codes and statutes would be either accepted or rejected.
[08:52.120 --> 08:59.120]  And once they were in acceptable format, they were accepted by the legislature, but they were not law.
[08:59.120 --> 09:14.120]  They were merely a representation of law. And to the degree that they actually reflected the statute as it was passed, they had the effect of law.
[09:14.120 --> 09:28.120]  But if there was a disagreement, if when the publisher reduced the legislation, which is often very lengthy and convoluted,
[09:28.120 --> 09:48.120]  when they reduced that to a code or statute, if they interpreted it or printed it in a way that could be construed as substantially different than the legislature,
[09:48.120 --> 09:57.120]  then always the legislation governed. And to the governing of the legislation,
[09:57.120 --> 10:09.120]  the courts were required to look to the intent of the legislature in passing the legislation, not just to the verbiage of the legislation,
[10:09.120 --> 10:22.120]  but to the stated legislative intent, which could only be found in the statements of the legislators in promoting the legislation.
[10:22.120 --> 10:33.120]  So we go back to the Speedy Trial Act. The Speedy Trial Act was overturned because they didn't like the caption.
[10:33.120 --> 10:43.120]  The caption did not give sufficient notice. And it said that if the person was denied a Speedy Trial,
[10:43.120 --> 10:51.120]  was not brought to trial within 30 days on a class C misdemeanor, the court shall dismiss the case.
[10:51.120 --> 10:58.120]  And the courts argued that that dictated a judicial determination and violated the separation of powers.
[10:58.120 --> 11:07.120]  So they struck the act, struck it the first time, and it was passed after that, and they struck it again.
[11:07.120 --> 11:16.120]  They didn't fix this primary part that dictated a judicial determination. They did that on purpose, was my opinion.
[11:16.120 --> 11:25.120]  They passed the law. We have to construe the law as if they knew what they were doing. We're required to.
[11:25.120 --> 11:35.120]  So they got it overturned because it dictated a judicial determination, and then they repassed it, dictating a judicial determination.
[11:35.120 --> 11:43.120]  They did that on purpose. It made it look like they were actually doing something, but it wasn't substantive.
[11:43.120 --> 11:53.120]  But regardless of that, we have a constitutional right to a Speedy Trial. It does not need to be codified.
[11:53.120 --> 12:03.120]  It's in the Constitution. So the fact that the Speedy Trial Act was overturned, that did not overturn the Constitution,
[12:03.120 --> 12:12.120]  constitutional requirement, neither did it exclude public officials from ignoring the constitutional requirement.
[12:13.120 --> 12:27.120]  And to determine what the legislature intended the constitutional right to mean, they must go back to the stated intent of the legislature.
[12:27.120 --> 12:36.120]  And it was the stated intent of the legislature in the Preamble to 23A.02, I think it is,
[12:37.120 --> 12:53.120]  that a Speedy Trial, that a trial be construed as Speedy if in Class C-30, Class B-60, Class A-90, a felony 120.
[12:53.120 --> 13:09.120]  Okay, that defined what the legislature intended that the constitutional right, the constitutional requirement entailed.
[13:09.120 --> 13:15.120]  I don't like to say constitutional right because it didn't give you a right. The Constitution did not speak to you.
[13:15.120 --> 13:24.120]  The Constitution spoke to public officials. It said, you will do this and you'll do it within this time limit.
[13:24.120 --> 13:33.120]  And unlike Barker Wingo, which said you had to timely demand a Speedy Trial and you had to show harm,
[13:33.120 --> 13:41.120]  the legislators in Texas specifically stated that you did not have to show harm.
[13:41.120 --> 13:48.120]  They didn't speak to demanding it, but that's nonsense anyway. That's from Barker Wingo.
[13:48.120 --> 13:54.120]  We'll pick this up on the other side. I got a little more preaching to do. We'll be right back.
[14:11.120 --> 14:13.120]  We'll be right back.
[14:41.120 --> 14:48.120]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com.
[14:48.120 --> 14:59.120]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[14:59.120 --> 15:06.120]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[15:06.120 --> 15:11.120]  If we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[15:11.120 --> 15:15.120]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[15:15.120 --> 15:18.120]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[15:18.120 --> 15:24.120]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[15:24.120 --> 15:29.120]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[15:29.120 --> 15:33.120]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[15:33.120 --> 15:38.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today.
[15:38.120 --> 15:43.120]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[15:43.120 --> 15:48.120]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[15:48.120 --> 15:52.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[15:52.120 --> 15:57.120]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[15:57.120 --> 16:07.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[16:27.120 --> 16:43.120]  The world is spinning like it's out of control On the edge of a hole inside a deep dark bone
[16:43.120 --> 16:49.120]  I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul
[16:50.120 --> 17:00.120]  So I sit back and I watch the evidence unfold And I see justice is the goal
[17:03.120 --> 17:07.120]  Justice is the goal
[17:09.120 --> 17:15.120]  Sometimes we sail a little too far at sea And then we gotta get back on course quickly
[17:15.120 --> 17:22.120]  So we go on a heavy advisory From the man that came all the way from Galilee
[17:22.120 --> 17:28.120]  I was looking for a safe and warm place to be Where I don't have to worry about the police
[17:46.120 --> 17:51.120]  And of course the legislative acts and all that interrelate
[17:51.120 --> 17:55.120]  This doesn't just apply to Speedy Trial, it essentially applies to everything
[17:55.120 --> 18:03.120]  But anyway, Speedy Trial, what Barker Wingo said, and I have a big problem with Barker Wingo
[18:03.120 --> 18:08.120]  Barker Wingo said that in order, and Barker Wingo was a federal case
[18:08.120 --> 18:14.120]  They said in the Fed, there were four things, and I forget what the first two were
[18:14.120 --> 18:22.120]  They were relatively innocuous, but the third and fourth said that in order to have a right to a Speedy Trial
[18:22.120 --> 18:28.120]  You had to timely demand one, and you had to show harm
[18:29.120 --> 18:36.120]  Well, the Texas State Speedy Trial statute didn't require that
[18:36.120 --> 18:41.120]  And the preamble specifically stated that you did not have to show harm
[18:41.120 --> 18:46.120]  It did not address whether or not you had to demand one
[18:46.120 --> 18:56.120]  But the way I look at this, the public officials entered into a contract with you and I
[18:56.120 --> 19:01.120]  There's a lot of stuff about oaths of office
[19:01.120 --> 19:06.120]  Some folks don't think the oath of office is a big deal, I do
[19:06.120 --> 19:11.120]  I think the oath of office is a big deal because it establishes a contract
[19:11.120 --> 19:20.120]  And what they swear to in that contract, which was a requirement of them taking office
[19:20.120 --> 19:25.120]  They had to swear to protect the Constitution and oppose the laws
[19:25.120 --> 19:32.120]  I think the alternate view there is speaking to our remedy in there
[19:32.120 --> 19:36.120]  If these guys are committing crimes, then we don't need to reference their contract
[19:36.120 --> 19:41.120]  Whether they had one or not, we just go after them for committing the crimes, right?
[19:41.120 --> 19:43.120]  But what you're saying
[19:43.120 --> 19:46.120]  That wasn't where I was going with it, you're right about that
[19:46.120 --> 19:52.120]  If they commit a crime, that's ultra-virus, that's outside the scope of the contract
[19:52.120 --> 19:54.120]  But here they're acting inside the scope
[19:54.120 --> 20:03.120]  And the scope says that they will provide us with all of the requirements of the Constitution
[20:03.120 --> 20:08.120]  The Constitution is a constitutional contract
[20:08.120 --> 20:12.120]  Not a contract between the government and the people
[20:13.120 --> 20:22.120]  Constitutional contract is a contract between the people and public officials
[20:22.120 --> 20:31.120]  Before a public official can take on the authority of his office or her office
[20:31.120 --> 20:36.120]  Or his office, I want to make sure I don't mispronounce anybody
[20:36.120 --> 20:41.120]  They must swear on their oath they will do these things
[20:41.120 --> 20:46.120]  And on that condition, we give them a check for their services
[20:46.120 --> 20:51.120]  When they cash that first check, a contract is established
[20:51.120 --> 20:56.120]  Now all these patriot guys want to bring in the UCC
[20:56.120 --> 21:01.120]  Okay, let's bring in the UCC
[21:01.120 --> 21:05.120]  Finally, there's a place where contract law would fit
[21:05.120 --> 21:07.120]  Exactly
[21:07.120 --> 21:11.120]  The Constitution is a contract
[21:11.120 --> 21:17.120]  I and you and the rest of us are not parties to that contract
[21:17.120 --> 21:25.120]  Our legal fiction we call the United States and the several states individually
[21:25.120 --> 21:32.120]  Those legal fictions have entered into a contract with these public officials
[21:32.120 --> 21:36.120]  It's just like a corporation hiring someone
[21:36.120 --> 21:42.120]  It's just like Cisco hiring a security service
[21:42.120 --> 21:44.120]  They're all under contract
[21:44.120 --> 21:48.120]  Our public officials are under contract to the United States or to the state we're in
[21:48.120 --> 21:53.120]  We are not, you and I, we are not parties to that contract
[21:53.120 --> 21:57.120]  But we are third party beneficiaries to the contract
[21:57.120 --> 22:02.120]  While we have no power in the contract itself
[22:02.120 --> 22:08.120]  We do have the power to enforce any violation of the contract
[22:08.120 --> 22:15.120]  We get to sue them under 42 U.S. Code 1983
[22:15.120 --> 22:18.120]  That's our power to control the contract
[22:18.120 --> 22:26.120]  So what the Fed said in Barker Wingo is that you as a public official
[22:26.120 --> 22:31.120]  No longer have to do what you swore on your oath you would do
[22:31.120 --> 22:36.120]  Unless the citizen commands that you do so
[22:36.120 --> 22:41.120]  And that the citizen can show harm if you did not
[22:41.120 --> 22:46.120]  That is problematic in the Fed but even more so it's a problem in the state
[22:46.120 --> 22:50.120]  Because the state didn't say any such thing
[22:50.120 --> 22:57.120]  As a matter of fact the legislative intent indicated that you didn't have to show harm
[22:57.120 --> 23:01.120]  They didn't mention give timely notice
[23:01.120 --> 23:04.120]  Which would have been problematic as well
[23:04.120 --> 23:10.120]  The biggest problem is they extended that to examining trials
[23:10.120 --> 23:17.120]  They took the concept from Barker Wingo and said
[23:17.120 --> 23:24.120]  Before you can enjoy an examining trial you must demand one
[23:24.120 --> 23:26.120]  I'm saying wait a minute, wait a minute
[23:26.120 --> 23:29.120]  That's not what the statute says
[23:29.120 --> 23:32.120]  The statutes say that if a public official
[23:32.120 --> 23:35.120]  And you don't have anything to do with this part
[23:35.120 --> 23:41.120]  It tells public officials if you arrest someone for an on-site offense
[23:41.120 --> 23:49.120]  You are to take them directly to the nearest magistrate not judge
[23:49.120 --> 23:53.120]  All judges wear two hats
[23:53.120 --> 23:57.120]  You take them to someone who has a position as a judge
[23:57.120 --> 24:03.120]  But when you bring an arrested person to that judge based on an initial arrest
[24:03.120 --> 24:07.120]  His judge's hat comes off, his magistrate's hat comes on
[24:07.120 --> 24:12.120]  And he must make a determination of probable cause
[24:12.120 --> 24:20.120]  And chapter 16 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure specifies precisely how he will do that
[24:20.120 --> 24:27.120]  I just watched some videos of this rather colorful judge in Houston
[24:27.120 --> 24:31.120]  Who is holding these hearings
[24:31.120 --> 24:35.120]  He's got someone before him, sometimes they've got counsel, sometimes they don't
[24:35.120 --> 24:38.120]  Sometimes there's a prosecutor, sometimes there's not
[24:38.120 --> 24:42.120]  And he makes a determination of probable cause
[24:42.120 --> 24:45.120]  Whoa, Bubba!
[24:45.120 --> 24:49.120]  And I think this is because of the suit we filed
[24:49.120 --> 24:52.120]  As they put that in the law now
[24:52.120 --> 24:56.120]  That there has to be a probable cause determination
[24:56.120 --> 24:59.120]  And Brett's working on that as we speak
[24:59.120 --> 25:02.120]  So he just says he finds probable cause
[25:02.120 --> 25:07.120]  Where's the accused? Where is the accuser?
[25:07.120 --> 25:12.120]  Where in did he give the accused opportunity to make a statement?
[25:12.120 --> 25:16.120]  To examine the witnesses
[25:16.120 --> 25:26.120]  Where in did he certify all of the records and cause the accused to sign and agree to the veracity of the certification?
[25:26.120 --> 25:29.120]  Where in did he forward it to the clerk of the court?
[25:29.120 --> 25:33.120]  And where did the clerk of the court forward it to the grand jury?
[25:33.120 --> 25:37.120]  And where did the grand jury find an indictment
[25:37.120 --> 25:43.120]  And give it to the district judge who was certified back to the misdemeanor court
[25:43.120 --> 25:45.120]  None of that stuff's happening
[25:45.120 --> 25:51.120]  That's because they don't have to do any of this unless you command them to do it
[25:51.120 --> 25:54.120]  I have a problem with that, I'll be taking that on
[25:54.120 --> 26:02.120]  But in the meantime, we were talking about arraignments
[26:02.120 --> 26:05.120]  They can't have one class C misdemeanor
[26:05.120 --> 26:09.120]  Because if they did, they'd have to set an arraignment
[26:09.120 --> 26:12.120]  And however long it takes to get to the hearing
[26:12.120 --> 26:15.120]  And then they'd have to set a trial date
[26:15.120 --> 26:18.120]  They're going to run out of 30 days real fast
[26:18.120 --> 26:22.120]  They're not going to have time to have an arraignment in a class C misdemeanor
[26:22.120 --> 26:29.120]  Or they'll overshoot the 30 day speedy trial requirement
[26:29.120 --> 26:34.120]  Brett, somebody asked me once how we know all this stuff
[26:35.120 --> 26:38.120]  They teach me, I just figured out how to argue that
[26:38.120 --> 26:42.120]  You're telling me, is that cool or what?
[26:42.120 --> 26:45.120]  Well, we haven't been through all sides of it yet
[26:45.120 --> 26:48.120]  But yeah, I can see how we progress in this
[26:48.120 --> 26:51.120]  Just by processing through the codes
[26:51.120 --> 26:53.120]  Anybody can do it
[26:53.120 --> 26:55.120]  We'll be right back
[26:55.120 --> 26:58.120]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work
[26:58.120 --> 27:01.120]  But have they negatively affected our health?
[27:01.120 --> 27:02.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[27:02.120 --> 27:04.120]  And I'll be back in just a moment with new findings
[27:04.120 --> 27:08.120]  About how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry
[27:08.120 --> 27:10.120]  Privacy is under attack
[27:10.120 --> 27:12.120]  When you give up data about yourself
[27:12.120 --> 27:14.120]  You'll never get it back again
[27:14.120 --> 27:16.120]  And once your privacy is gone
[27:16.120 --> 27:19.120]  You'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[27:19.120 --> 27:21.120]  So protect your privacy
[27:22.120 --> 27:25.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[27:25.120 --> 27:29.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[27:29.120 --> 27:32.120]  Start over with StartPage
[27:32.120 --> 27:35.120]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy
[27:35.120 --> 27:36.120]  It's a fact
[27:36.120 --> 27:40.120]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head
[27:40.120 --> 27:41.120]  Has been disappeared
[27:41.120 --> 27:43.120]  We'll be right back
[27:51.120 --> 27:53.120]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors
[27:53.120 --> 27:56.120]  While cell phone companies have downplayed concerns
[27:56.120 --> 27:59.120]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming
[27:59.120 --> 28:01.120]  That cell phones affect brain chemistry
[28:01.120 --> 28:05.120]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism
[28:05.120 --> 28:08.120]  In the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna
[28:08.120 --> 28:10.120]  Increases when the cell phone is on
[28:10.120 --> 28:13.120]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage
[28:13.120 --> 28:15.120]  I'm not taking any chances
[28:15.120 --> 28:17.120]  I always keep the phone far from my body
[28:17.120 --> 28:19.120]  And I use a corded headset
[28:19.120 --> 28:20.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[28:20.120 --> 28:23.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[28:49.120 --> 28:51.120]  And believe there is more to the story
[28:51.120 --> 28:54.120]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son
[28:54.120 --> 28:56.120]  Go to buildingwatt.org
[28:56.120 --> 28:59.120]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do
[28:59.120 --> 29:03.120]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[29:03.120 --> 29:05.120]  And a better understanding of His Word?
[29:05.120 --> 29:08.120]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays
[29:08.120 --> 29:11.120]  From 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk
[29:11.120 --> 29:14.120]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures
[29:14.120 --> 29:16.120]  In accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[29:16.120 --> 29:19.120]  Study to show thyself approved unto God
[29:19.120 --> 29:21.120]  A workman that needeth not to be ashamed
[29:21.120 --> 29:23.120]  Rightly dividing the word of truth
[29:23.120 --> 29:26.120]  Starting in January, our first hour studies
[29:26.120 --> 29:27.120]  Are in the Book of Mark
[29:27.120 --> 29:29.120]  Where we'll go verse by verse
[29:29.120 --> 29:31.120]  And discuss the true gospel message
[29:31.120 --> 29:34.120]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week
[29:34.120 --> 29:36.120]  With discussions on sound doctrine
[29:36.120 --> 29:38.120]  And Christian character development
[29:38.120 --> 29:40.120]  We wish to reflect God's light
[29:40.120 --> 29:43.120]  And be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[29:43.120 --> 29:45.120]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith
[29:45.120 --> 29:47.120]  And to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[29:47.120 --> 29:49.120]  Of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[29:49.120 --> 29:51.120]  So tune in to scripture talk
[29:51.120 --> 29:53.120]  Live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[29:53.120 --> 29:55.120]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[29:55.120 --> 29:59.120]  To inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures
[30:02.120 --> 30:05.120]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[30:06.120 --> 30:09.120]  At LogosRadioNetwork.com
[30:13.120 --> 30:15.120]  Yeah, I got a warrant
[30:16.120 --> 30:18.120]  And I'm gonna serve them
[30:19.120 --> 30:21.120]  To the head of government them
[30:22.120 --> 30:23.120]  Prosecute them
[30:24.120 --> 30:25.120]  Okay
[30:28.120 --> 30:29.120]  Who's that?
[30:31.120 --> 30:32.120]  Citizens are raised
[30:33.120 --> 30:34.120]  For Mr Bush
[30:36.120 --> 30:37.120]  Citizens are raised
[30:38.120 --> 30:39.120]  For Dick Cheney
[30:40.120 --> 30:42.120]  Well I need a prosecutor
[30:42.120 --> 30:43.120]  Come and help me
[30:43.120 --> 30:45.120]  Prosecute them wicked leader
[30:45.120 --> 30:46.120]  You see
[30:46.120 --> 30:47.120]  They murder a liar
[30:47.120 --> 30:48.120]  Them tell me
[30:48.120 --> 30:49.120]  Them a liar
[30:49.120 --> 30:50.120]  Not tell sweet stories
[30:50.120 --> 30:51.120]  Me not believe
[30:51.120 --> 30:52.120]  Me say what them tell me
[30:52.120 --> 30:55.120]  3% of America vote for Bush
[30:55.120 --> 30:57.120]  So how the hell he get the presidency?
[30:58.120 --> 31:00.120]  That's why me have a warrant for him
[31:00.120 --> 31:02.120]  Okay, we are back
[31:02.120 --> 31:04.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and LogosRadio
[31:05.120 --> 31:07.120]  And we're circling back to arraignment
[31:08.120 --> 31:10.120]  Kind of a circular way to get here but
[31:10.120 --> 31:15.120]  It demonstrates how well structured
[31:16.120 --> 31:17.120]  The Corpus Juris is
[31:17.120 --> 31:19.120]  The Texas body of law
[31:19.120 --> 31:22.120]  It is extremely well put together
[31:22.120 --> 31:25.120]  And this is something that just figured out on the show
[31:26.120 --> 31:27.120]  How to argue this issue
[31:27.120 --> 31:30.120]  Brett and I have been kicking this around before
[31:30.120 --> 31:35.120]  This thing of 2601 that restricts an arraignment
[31:36.120 --> 31:40.120]  To felonies or misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment
[31:41.120 --> 31:44.120]  And it made sense that
[31:44.120 --> 31:48.120]  If I'm charged with a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment
[31:48.120 --> 31:52.120]  And they have to get me to trial within 30 days
[31:52.120 --> 31:55.120]  If they set an arraignment hearing
[31:56.120 --> 32:00.120]  Then generally they say you have to appear
[32:01.120 --> 32:02.120]  Within 10 days
[32:02.120 --> 32:05.120]  Or only before a certain date and it's generally 10 days
[32:06.120 --> 32:10.120]  So that leaves them 20 days to get to trial
[32:12.120 --> 32:16.120]  It doesn't leave any time for motion pleadings
[32:16.120 --> 32:19.120]  And all this other stuff that goes on
[32:20.120 --> 32:24.120]  It would be very difficult to get someone to trial within 30 days
[32:25.120 --> 32:27.120]  Yeah, they better be on the ball
[32:28.120 --> 32:29.120]  But they're not
[32:29.120 --> 32:30.120]  They don't have much time
[32:30.120 --> 32:37.120]  And prosecutors use this repeated summons to court
[32:38.120 --> 32:41.120]  In order to hold someone
[32:41.120 --> 32:45.120]  Hold charges over someone's head essentially indefinitely
[32:46.120 --> 32:50.120]  Right, and it affects their job
[32:50.120 --> 32:51.120]  It affects their
[32:51.120 --> 32:53.120]  They can't just go about their day to day business
[32:53.120 --> 32:56.120]  Because they keep getting dragged in for these
[32:57.120 --> 32:58.120]  I've got a
[32:58.120 --> 33:01.120]  I've got some case law on that
[33:01.120 --> 33:08.120]  That talks about how the pendency of trial hangs over a person's head
[33:08.120 --> 33:12.120]  And jeopardizes their mental stability
[33:12.120 --> 33:14.120]  Or it just goes into it real deep
[33:14.120 --> 33:16.120]  The courts have addressed this
[33:16.120 --> 33:21.120]  That a speedy trial right was put into place
[33:21.120 --> 33:24.120]  Because our founders
[33:24.120 --> 33:30.120]  You know, we think of them as having been around 250 years ago
[33:31.120 --> 33:39.120]  Well, I once had a man relate to me
[33:39.120 --> 33:44.120]  His personal experience of the Civil War
[33:45.120 --> 33:49.120]  It claimed to be 117, it was 1967
[33:49.120 --> 33:52.120]  And he was five years old when the war ended
[33:53.120 --> 33:56.120]  He fed a furnace for his room and board
[33:56.120 --> 34:00.120]  In a three flat walk up in Chicago
[34:02.120 --> 34:04.120]  I go back that far
[34:05.120 --> 34:12.120]  That's only 70 years after the country was formed
[34:13.120 --> 34:16.120]  They understood the same problems we have now
[34:16.120 --> 34:21.120]  They weren't some ancient politicians who didn't understand what the heck was going on
[34:22.120 --> 34:25.120]  They understood exactly the problems we're having now
[34:25.120 --> 34:29.120]  Even to Benjamin Franklin warning us right at the beginning
[34:29.120 --> 34:35.120]  Do not try to be the policemen of the world
[34:35.120 --> 34:38.120]  They understood these problems
[34:38.120 --> 34:45.120]  They understood jurisprudence and how it should be formed and how it should function
[34:45.120 --> 34:52.120]  England had been struggling with this for over a thousand years by this time
[34:52.120 --> 34:58.120]  So we've had lots of generations go through about every permutation you can imagine
[34:58.120 --> 35:06.120]  That helped the United States put together a very well structured body of law
[35:06.120 --> 35:09.120]  And then the state of Texas to do the same
[35:09.120 --> 35:14.120]  The body of law for the state of Texas is extremely well put together
[35:16.120 --> 35:21.120]  And just about anything you can come up with is in there
[35:21.120 --> 35:24.120]  Part of the things people call in and ask me about
[35:24.120 --> 35:29.120]  Can you do this? Can you do that? Is this illegal? Is that that illegal?
[35:29.120 --> 35:35.120]  Well, the gauge I use is reasonableness
[35:36.120 --> 35:40.120]  If a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would look at something and say
[35:40.120 --> 35:43.120]  You know that should be illegal
[35:43.120 --> 35:47.120]  I can almost guarantee you that it is
[35:47.120 --> 35:51.120]  Our law is that well structured
[35:51.120 --> 35:54.120]  All you have to do is go find it
[35:54.120 --> 36:05.120]  And the law itself, every single provision in there is carefully crafted into a single mosaic
[36:05.120 --> 36:16.120]  Our public officials have always attempted to change the law to suit their personal and professional preference
[36:16.120 --> 36:20.120]  It is the nature of the beast
[36:20.120 --> 36:23.120]  And our founders understood that
[36:23.120 --> 36:32.120]  And they built this system in a way that we would have all of the remedy that we need
[36:32.120 --> 36:35.120]  We just need to go and engage it
[36:35.120 --> 36:37.120]  And people are saying, oh, it's so complicated
[36:37.120 --> 36:38.120]  Yeah, it is
[36:38.120 --> 36:41.120]  It's complicated. Life is complicated
[36:41.120 --> 36:43.120]  Get over it
[36:43.120 --> 36:48.120]  If you really want your rights and you're not just whining and complaining
[36:48.120 --> 36:50.120]  Want somebody else to do it for you
[36:50.120 --> 36:56.120]  If you really want your rights, you must go out there and claim them
[36:56.120 --> 36:58.120]  That's all the preaching I'm going to do
[36:58.120 --> 37:00.120]  But back to arraignment
[37:00.120 --> 37:02.120]  They can't have an arraignment in a Class D misdemeanor
[37:02.120 --> 37:07.120]  So if you get a ticket and they call you in for an arraignment
[37:07.120 --> 37:09.120]  I did that years ago
[37:09.120 --> 37:16.120]  I raised that issue that the court ordered me to come to court, but they didn't tell me why
[37:16.120 --> 37:25.120]  And this was in a county court because I had already been to a JP court and bumped it up the county
[37:25.120 --> 37:31.120]  And so I said, your honor, this tells me, orders me to be here. You want to tell me why I'm here?
[37:31.120 --> 37:35.120]  And she looked at the prosecutor. They couldn't figure it out
[37:35.120 --> 37:45.120]  And then I said, well, your honor, 2801 dictates all of the things you can order me to come to court for
[37:45.120 --> 37:49.120]  And since there are no motions or pleadings before this court, you want to tell me what I'm doing here
[37:49.120 --> 37:51.120]  So she got it out and read it
[37:51.120 --> 37:53.120]  The first thing said, an arraignment
[37:53.120 --> 37:57.120]  I didn't realize she couldn't do that in a Class D misdemeanor at the time
[37:57.120 --> 38:02.120]  She said, oh, well, well, well, we have called you in for an arraignment hearing
[38:02.120 --> 38:05.120]  And she said, well, Mr. Kelton, how do you plea?
[38:05.120 --> 38:10.120]  Oh, your honor, I am innocent as the driven snow
[38:10.120 --> 38:15.120]  And she said, Mr. Kelton, I can't take that as a plea
[38:15.120 --> 38:19.120]  Yeah, but I am, Judge. I'm innocent as the driven snow
[38:19.120 --> 38:23.120]  And to her credit, she kind of got a chuckle out of it
[38:23.120 --> 38:27.120]  Because I had caught her flat-footed
[38:27.120 --> 38:32.120]  If I knew then what I know now, it would have gotten a lot more difficult
[38:32.120 --> 38:40.120]  This was a county judge, so she was learning counsel and understood that the law applied
[38:40.120 --> 38:42.120]  These municipal courts don't
[38:42.120 --> 38:49.120]  But I'm going to write a motion objecting to an arraignment hearing in a Class A misdemeanor
[38:49.120 --> 38:53.120]  And file that, put that in my ticket pile
[38:53.120 --> 38:57.120]  So you started out saying you wanted to argue with me about this
[38:57.120 --> 39:01.120]  Is that because you know I have a little different angle of understanding this?
[39:01.120 --> 39:04.120]  Yes, so throw your angle at me
[39:04.120 --> 39:13.120]  Do you want that angle to go out on the air for your county judge and learned the counsel folks to be able to
[39:13.120 --> 39:16.120]  Or do you want them to have to look it up themselves?
[39:16.120 --> 39:20.120]  I don't. They're not going to listen to us
[39:20.120 --> 39:31.120]  Well, the way I look at it, the right way to construe this announcement by the legislature
[39:31.120 --> 39:38.120]  That there shall be an arraignment in these several kinds of severities of crimes
[39:38.120 --> 39:44.120]  Well, they left out the crimes that would be fine only, right?
[39:44.120 --> 39:48.120]  The Class C lowest level ones, they left that out
[39:48.120 --> 39:50.120]  But they weren't saying that it couldn't happen
[39:50.120 --> 39:53.120]  They just said that it shall happen in the others
[39:53.120 --> 40:00.120]  And the way that I think that that ought to be read is the way that we keep saying 1601 ought to be read
[40:00.120 --> 40:04.120]  1601 that talks about the examining trial
[40:04.120 --> 40:08.120]  And they insist that we can't have an examining trial in a misdemeanor
[40:08.120 --> 40:10.120]  That doesn't exist, there's no such thing
[40:10.120 --> 40:15.120]  There has to be a felony before you can have an examining trial
[40:15.120 --> 40:19.120]  And I say no, that's not what 1601 says
[40:20.120 --> 40:31.120]  It merely confirms that in one particular situation there must be an examining trial
[40:31.120 --> 40:34.120]  No, no, no, that's not what it says
[40:34.120 --> 40:37.120]  It doesn't say there must be one
[40:37.120 --> 40:43.120]  It says there must be one before something else happens
[40:43.120 --> 40:47.120]  Right? It's speaking to the when and the where
[40:47.120 --> 40:51.120]  But it's not saying you can't have an examining trial otherwise
[40:51.120 --> 40:56.120]  And I maintain that that's the same thing going on with the arraignment
[40:56.120 --> 40:58.120]  It's not saying you can't have one otherwise
[40:58.120 --> 41:02.120]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:02.120 --> 41:06.120]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:06.120 --> 41:10.120]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:10.120 --> 41:15.120]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan
[41:15.120 --> 41:17.120]  By lowering the claims cost?
[41:17.120 --> 41:23.120]  The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[41:23.120 --> 41:29.120]  That provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc
[41:29.120 --> 41:32.120]  All at zero cost, with zero co-pay
[41:32.120 --> 41:38.120]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[41:38.120 --> 41:44.120]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[41:44.120 --> 41:50.120]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit
[41:50.120 --> 41:59.120]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[42:08.120 --> 42:14.120]  Understand 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[42:14.120 --> 42:18.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[42:18.120 --> 42:22.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[42:22.120 --> 42:27.120]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[42:27.120 --> 42:33.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[42:33.120 --> 42:38.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[42:38.120 --> 42:42.120]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[42:42.120 --> 42:48.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[42:48.120 --> 42:51.120]  pro se tactics, and much more
[42:51.120 --> 42:55.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[42:55.120 --> 43:00.120]  or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ
[43:03.120 --> 43:08.120]  Thank you for watching!
[43:33.120 --> 43:39.120]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton
[43:39.120 --> 43:45.120]  I'm just here making my living pushing buttons
[43:45.120 --> 43:51.120]  I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[43:51.120 --> 43:57.120]  I vote for bravery and against slavery showing resistance
[43:58.120 --> 44:02.120]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelvin, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[44:02.120 --> 44:10.120]  And Brett is saying that while the statute requires an arraignment
[44:10.120 --> 44:15.120]  in matters where a person's liberty can be at risk
[44:15.120 --> 44:19.120]  that that does not preclude an arraignment hearing
[44:19.120 --> 44:25.120]  just because someone's liberty is not at risk. Am I accurate in that, Brett?
[44:25.120 --> 44:29.120]  Yeah, I guess that's a good parallel way to say it
[44:29.120 --> 44:34.120]  I'm specifically looking at Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 2601
[44:34.120 --> 44:40.120]  where it's mandating an arraignment for felony cases after indictment
[44:40.120 --> 44:43.120]  and all misdemeanor cases punishable by imprisonment
[44:43.120 --> 44:45.120]  So it's mandatory there
[44:45.120 --> 44:51.120]  And all I'm saying is that the fact that those severities are mandatory
[44:51.120 --> 44:56.120]  doesn't necessarily mean that there's no such thing as an arraignment for Class C
[44:56.120 --> 44:58.120]  That's all I'm saying
[44:58.120 --> 45:03.120]  Okay, what I'm going to argue is that our public officials
[45:03.120 --> 45:09.120]  may not do anything that they are not specifically authorized to do
[45:09.120 --> 45:14.120]  I watch these judges doing this kind of garbage all the time
[45:14.120 --> 45:19.120]  There's a particular judge that someone gave me a link to
[45:19.120 --> 45:24.120]  He's a County Judge 5 out of Houston
[45:24.120 --> 45:26.120]  Fleischer or something
[45:26.120 --> 45:32.120]  He wears all these really weird Captain Kangaroo suits
[45:32.120 --> 45:35.120]  Uh, plaid boat tires and things
[45:35.120 --> 45:37.120]  Yeah, green suits
[45:37.120 --> 45:41.120]  And he's got this person in front of him
[45:41.120 --> 45:47.120]  And this guy is quoting law to him
[45:47.120 --> 45:50.120]  And he's throwing in some patriot stuff
[45:50.120 --> 45:54.120]  And the judge laughs in his face
[45:54.120 --> 45:59.120]  And says, oh, have I been waiting for one of these?
[45:59.120 --> 46:06.120]  And then proceeds to denigrate and disparage this guy
[46:06.120 --> 46:11.120]  because he's trying to learn law and learn how to defend himself
[46:11.120 --> 46:13.120]  I was furious
[46:13.120 --> 46:20.120]  And then he says, I find probable cause
[46:20.120 --> 46:26.120]  That sounds suspiciously like the training
[46:26.120 --> 46:29.120]  I didn't know what these hearings were
[46:29.120 --> 46:32.120]  He would come on and this guy would be standing in front of the judge
[46:32.120 --> 46:39.120]  And then when he said, I find probable cause, whoa, hold on
[46:39.120 --> 46:44.120]  I don't see the accused, the accuser there
[46:44.120 --> 46:49.120]  I didn't see him give the person an opportunity to make a statement
[46:49.120 --> 46:52.120]  Before anything was entered against him
[46:52.120 --> 46:55.120]  I did see the judge reading this guy's file
[46:55.120 --> 46:58.120]  I was arrested in Williamson County
[46:58.120 --> 47:02.120]  When I tried to get the district attorney and district judge arrested
[47:02.120 --> 47:08.120]  And the next morning they brought me before a magistrate into jail
[47:08.120 --> 47:13.120]  And they called me up and before we started, I said, your honor, I have a question
[47:13.120 --> 47:16.120]  And he said, yes, but by then they figured out who I was
[47:16.120 --> 47:18.120]  And they were on their tippy toes
[47:18.120 --> 47:21.120]  When I was going in there, the jailer said, now you know
[47:21.120 --> 47:23.120]  I didn't have anything to do with this, Mr. Kelton
[47:23.120 --> 47:26.120]  I'm just doing my job
[47:26.120 --> 47:28.120]  So they get a little worried
[47:28.120 --> 47:31.120]  They bring me up in front of this judge
[47:31.120 --> 47:34.120]  And I said, your honor, before you start, I have a question
[47:34.120 --> 47:36.120]  Well, yes, Mr. Kelton, what's that?
[47:36.120 --> 47:39.120]  I see you have a file in front of you
[47:39.120 --> 47:43.120]  Does that file have anything in there about me?
[47:43.120 --> 47:46.120]  He said, well, yes, it does
[47:46.120 --> 47:49.120]  Where did you get that?
[47:49.120 --> 47:52.120]  And the judge sat back in his seat
[47:52.120 --> 47:56.120]  And he looked around, looked to each side, and I knew
[47:56.120 --> 48:01.120]  This judge knew exactly what I was talking about
[48:01.120 --> 48:05.120]  He knew precisely where I was going
[48:05.120 --> 48:10.120]  Chapter 16 says that before any evidence is presented
[48:10.120 --> 48:13.120]  Against the accused under 16.04
[48:13.120 --> 48:20.120]  The accused shall be given opportunity to make a statement
[48:20.120 --> 48:27.120]  What in the heck is the judge doing with that file in his hand?
[48:27.120 --> 48:29.120]  He knew exactly where I was going
[48:29.120 --> 48:32.120]  Oh, this judge was on his tippy toes
[48:32.120 --> 48:37.120]  I thought maybe he was scared about you accusing him of ex parte communication
[48:37.120 --> 48:40.120]  Or it could have been both
[48:40.120 --> 48:44.120]  That's exactly what he was afraid of
[48:44.120 --> 48:47.120]  He has already talked to the prosecution
[48:47.120 --> 48:50.120]  Before he talked to me
[48:50.120 --> 48:53.120]  And he found out who I was and what I did
[48:53.120 --> 48:56.120]  And I have no doubt that he went in and read the codes
[48:56.120 --> 49:01.120]  Because when I said that to him, it was like I hit him with a hammer
[49:01.120 --> 49:05.120]  I was surprised at how taken aback he was
[49:05.120 --> 49:08.120]  And he just bent over backwards to be nice to me
[49:08.120 --> 49:11.120]  Let me out with no bail
[49:11.120 --> 49:17.120]  Ordered me to appear, and then before I ever got to court, they dismissed it
[49:17.120 --> 49:20.120]  But he knew, he had read it
[49:20.120 --> 49:27.120]  I'm saying that a public official may only do
[49:27.120 --> 49:31.120]  What he is specifically authorized to do
[49:31.120 --> 49:36.120]  He may not take upon himself to do anything
[49:36.120 --> 49:43.120]  And I find no place in Texas law where a court is authorized
[49:43.120 --> 49:48.120]  Or a magistrate is authorized to hold and examine
[49:48.120 --> 49:53.120]  I mean, where a court is authorized to hold an arraignment hearing
[49:53.120 --> 49:56.120]  In the matter of a class C misdemeanor
[49:56.120 --> 50:01.120]  Okay, I agree fully with the first part of that compound sentence
[50:01.120 --> 50:04.120]  And don't agree with the second part
[50:04.120 --> 50:12.120]  I agree that a public official may only do what's authorized by law
[50:12.120 --> 50:18.120]  But I do find somewhere where there's a provision that shows legislative intent
[50:18.120 --> 50:24.120]  For these guys to be authorized to do an arraignment in a class C
[50:24.120 --> 50:26.120]  Let's see if I can pull that up
[50:26.120 --> 50:28.120]  I think it's 1517
[50:28.120 --> 50:31.120]  I was afraid you were going to bring that up
[50:31.120 --> 50:33.120]  You had to bring up 1517
[50:33.120 --> 50:35.120]  I hate 1517
[50:35.120 --> 50:38.120]  It's a giant bowl of spaghetti
[50:38.120 --> 50:42.120]  Okay, so in 1517 subsection B
[50:42.120 --> 50:44.120]  Which is like page 93
[50:44.120 --> 50:48.120]  Okay, so it says after an accused, I'm exaggerating
[50:48.120 --> 50:51.120]  It's a large, large statute for everybody that's listening
[50:51.120 --> 50:55.120]  It's unnaturally large
[50:55.120 --> 50:57.120]  Okay, so subsection B says
[50:57.120 --> 51:02.120]  After an accused charged with a misdemeanor punishable by fine only
[51:02.120 --> 51:07.120]  Is taken by a before magistrate under subsection A
[51:07.120 --> 51:08.120]  That's those warnings
[51:08.120 --> 51:12.120]  And the magistrate has identified the accused with certainty
[51:12.120 --> 51:16.120]  The magistrate may release the accused without bond
[51:16.120 --> 51:20.120]  And order the accused to appear at a later date for arraignment
[51:20.120 --> 51:24.120]  In the applicable justice court or municipal court
[51:24.120 --> 51:30.120]  Yeah, I've read that
[51:30.120 --> 51:42.120]  However, I find that to be inconsistent with the statute on arraignments
[51:42.120 --> 51:44.120]  And I'm going to argue
[51:44.120 --> 51:51.120]  If we construe this mandate of 2601
[51:51.120 --> 51:57.120]  So that it makes this 1517 be mere surplusage
[51:57.120 --> 51:59.120]  You know, it renders superfluous
[51:59.120 --> 52:01.120]  This piece of legislative intent
[52:01.120 --> 52:04.120]  It shows that they intended for an arraignment to be able to happen
[52:04.120 --> 52:12.120]  And if we construe the mandate to also be carving out
[52:12.120 --> 52:16.120]  Making it not allowed to have in a class C
[52:16.120 --> 52:20.120]  Then I think that would be an inappropriate way to construe it
[52:20.120 --> 52:23.120]  And it would give credence to their silly idea
[52:23.120 --> 52:26.120]  That we don't get to have examining trials because it's not a felony
[52:26.120 --> 52:30.120]  It would give credence to that way of misconstruing the law
[52:30.120 --> 52:35.120]  Because that's exactly what they're trying to do with 1601
[52:35.120 --> 52:41.120]  When they say, well, yes, we're required to hold a felony in this particular instance
[52:41.120 --> 52:46.120]  But we're never going to hold an examining trial unless it is that instance
[52:46.120 --> 52:52.120]  Here's the problem with that
[52:52.120 --> 52:57.120]  Well, I had it, but I lost it for a second there
[52:57.120 --> 52:59.120]  If you go before a magistrate
[52:59.120 --> 53:04.120]  And what I allege that if you carefully study 15.17
[53:05.120 --> 53:10.120]  That provision only applies
[53:10.120 --> 53:14.120]  If a person is arrested on an existing warrant
[53:14.120 --> 53:18.120]  Outside of the county of jurisdiction
[53:18.120 --> 53:21.120]  In being arrested outside the county of jurisdiction
[53:21.120 --> 53:24.120]  The magistrate is not required to hold an examining trial
[53:24.120 --> 53:27.120]  Because he doesn't necessarily have all the witnesses
[53:27.120 --> 53:30.120]  And all of the documentation he needs in front of him
[53:30.120 --> 53:35.120]  He can set bail or release the person on their own recognizance
[53:35.120 --> 53:43.120]  And order them to appear before a magistrate in the county of original jurisdiction
[53:43.120 --> 53:48.120]  So he doesn't have to hold an examining trial at this time
[53:48.120 --> 53:52.120]  Which he normally would under Article 211
[53:52.120 --> 53:55.120]  Outside the county they may or may not
[53:55.120 --> 54:00.120]  So he must send him back to the county not for arraignment
[54:00.120 --> 54:06.120]  Because if this magistrate did not hold an examining trial
[54:06.120 --> 54:10.120]  Then the only thing they can do in the county of original jurisdiction
[54:10.120 --> 54:12.120]  Is to hold an examining trial
[54:12.120 --> 54:15.120]  If they attempted to hold an arraignment
[54:15.120 --> 54:23.120]  Then they would render Chapter 16 superfluous in this context
[54:23.120 --> 54:28.120]  There's absolutely no way to skip over the whole probable cause determination
[54:28.120 --> 54:30.120]  And go straight to arraignment
[54:30.120 --> 54:34.120]  Because arraignment presumes that the person as 2603 says
[54:34.120 --> 54:39.120]  You can't have an arraignment until the expiration of two full days
[54:39.120 --> 54:43.120]  After the service of primary pleadings on the defendant
[54:43.120 --> 54:47.120]  So that indictment or information comes later
[54:47.120 --> 54:50.120]  You can't just skip probable cause determination
[54:50.120 --> 54:53.120]  And the order of 1617, 1730
[54:53.120 --> 54:55.120]  Skip all of that and go straight to the arraignment
[54:55.120 --> 54:57.120]  That's completely crazy
[54:57.120 --> 55:01.120]  And we have a case that is exactly dead on this point
[55:01.120 --> 55:04.120]  D'Arruzzo v. State
[55:04.120 --> 55:08.120]  We have Dr. Joe on the call boards matter of fact
[55:08.120 --> 55:10.120]  Hello Dr. D'Arruzzo
[55:10.120 --> 55:12.120]  Hello
[55:12.120 --> 55:14.120]  Well I tried to
[55:14.120 --> 55:16.120]  Oh there you go
[55:16.120 --> 55:20.120]  So your case is turning out to be very valuable
[55:20.120 --> 55:22.120]  Hang on
[55:22.120 --> 55:24.120]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain
[55:24.120 --> 55:26.120]  We've used up almost an hour
[55:26.120 --> 55:28.120]  We've used up an hour
[55:28.120 --> 55:30.120]  So when we come back we'll close this out
[55:30.120 --> 55:32.120]  And go to our callers
[55:32.120 --> 55:34.120]  We've got Chris
[55:34.120 --> 55:36.120]  I'm going to want to talk to Chris about this
[55:36.120 --> 55:38.120]  Anyway
[55:38.120 --> 55:41.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Weave Low Radio
[55:41.120 --> 55:43.120]  We'll be right back
[55:43.120 --> 55:45.120]  In about five seconds
[55:45.120 --> 55:47.120]  Okay I was a little early
[55:47.120 --> 55:49.120]  My timing's off
[56:08.120 --> 56:11.120]  The free books are a three volume set called
[56:11.120 --> 56:13.120]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:13.120 --> 56:15.120]  Chapter by chapter
[56:15.120 --> 56:17.120]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:17.120 --> 56:19.120]  Clearly presents God's plan of salvation
[56:19.120 --> 56:21.120]  Growing in Christ
[56:21.120 --> 56:23.120]  And how to build up the church
[56:23.120 --> 56:26.120]  To order your free New Testament recovery version
[56:26.120 --> 56:29.120]  And Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[56:29.120 --> 56:31.120]  Call Bibles for America toll free
[56:31.120 --> 56:35.120]  At 888-551-321-7000
[56:35.120 --> 56:37.120]  Call Bibles for America toll free
[56:37.120 --> 56:41.120]  At 888-551-0102
[56:41.120 --> 56:45.120]  That's 888-551-0102
[56:45.120 --> 56:50.120]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[56:50.120 --> 56:53.120]  Live, free speech radio
[56:53.120 --> 56:56.120]  logosradionetwork.com
[57:02.120 --> 57:04.120]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments
[57:04.120 --> 57:05.120]  To the Constitution
[57:05.120 --> 57:07.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms
[57:07.120 --> 57:08.120]  Americans should know and protect
[57:08.120 --> 57:10.120]  Our liberty depends on it
[57:10.120 --> 57:11.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[57:11.120 --> 57:13.120]  And I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[57:13.120 --> 57:16.120]  To remember one of your constitutional rights
[57:16.120 --> 57:18.120]  Privacy is under attack
[57:18.120 --> 57:20.120]  When you give up data about yourself
[57:20.120 --> 57:22.120]  You'll never get it back again
[57:22.120 --> 57:24.120]  And once your privacy is gone
[57:24.120 --> 57:26.120]  You'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[57:26.120 --> 57:28.120]  So protect your rights
[57:28.120 --> 57:30.120]  Say no to surveillance
[57:30.120 --> 57:32.120]  And keep your information to yourself
[57:32.120 --> 57:34.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[57:34.120 --> 57:36.120]  This public service announcement
[57:36.120 --> 57:38.120]  Is brought to you by Startpage.com
[57:38.120 --> 57:40.120]  The private search engine alternative
[57:40.120 --> 57:42.120]  To Google, Yahoo and Bing
[57:42.120 --> 57:45.120]  Start over with Startpage
[57:45.120 --> 57:48.120]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed
[57:48.120 --> 57:51.120]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there
[57:51.120 --> 57:53.120]  He announces, I'm with the military
[57:53.120 --> 57:54.120]  And I'm sleeping here tonight
[57:54.120 --> 57:57.120]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed
[57:57.120 --> 58:00.120]  Reminds me what the third amendment was designed to prevent
[58:00.120 --> 58:03.120]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers
[58:03.120 --> 58:06.120]  A common demand in the days of our founding fathers
[58:06.120 --> 58:08.120]  Third party, third amendment, get it?
[58:08.120 --> 58:10.120]  So if you answer a knock at your door
[58:10.120 --> 58:12.120]  And guys in fatigues demand lodging
[58:12.120 --> 58:14.120]  Tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights
[58:14.120 --> 58:16.120]  And re-read the third amendment
[58:16.120 --> 58:17.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[58:17.120 --> 58:20.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[58:31.120 --> 58:34.120]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[58:34.120 --> 58:38.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[58:38.120 --> 58:40.120]  Our liberty depends on it
[58:40.120 --> 58:41.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[58:41.120 --> 58:43.120]  And I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[58:43.120 --> 58:46.120]  To remember one of your constitutional rights
[58:46.120 --> 58:48.120]  Privacy is under attack
[58:48.120 --> 58:50.120]  When you give up data about yourself
[58:50.120 --> 58:52.120]  You'll never get it back again
[58:52.120 --> 58:54.120]  And once your privacy is gone
[58:54.120 --> 58:56.120]  You'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[58:56.120 --> 58:58.120]  So protect your rights
[58:58.120 --> 59:01.120]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[59:01.120 --> 59:04.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[59:04.120 --> 59:07.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[59:07.120 --> 59:11.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[59:11.120 --> 59:14.120]  Start over with StartPage
[59:15.120 --> 59:18.120]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars
[59:18.120 --> 59:21.120]  A magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles
[59:21.120 --> 59:26.120]  That imagery reminds me that the fourth amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure
[59:26.120 --> 59:29.120]  Fourth amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[59:29.120 --> 59:33.120]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security
[59:33.120 --> 59:38.120]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing
[59:38.120 --> 59:42.120]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause
[59:42.120 --> 59:45.120]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells
[59:45.120 --> 59:48.120]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[59:48.120 --> 59:52.120]  And use their googly eyes to take a gander at the fourth
[59:52.120 --> 59:53.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[59:53.120 --> 59:57.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:00:23.120 --> 01:00:30.120]  I won't pay for the war with my body
[01:00:30.120 --> 01:00:34.120]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:00:34.120 --> 01:00:37.120]  I won't pay for the fun with my body
[01:00:37.120 --> 01:00:41.120]  Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy
[01:00:41.120 --> 01:00:44.120]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body
[01:00:44.120 --> 01:00:49.120]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:00:50.120 --> 01:00:56.120]  On this Friday, the 25th day of October 2024
[01:00:56.120 --> 01:00:59.120]  And we're gonna finish this off
[01:00:59.120 --> 01:01:04.120]  I'm gonna start out by reading the first part of 1517
[01:01:04.120 --> 01:01:12.120]  This has been, this is one of the worst statutes in all the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:01:12.120 --> 01:01:20.120]  In order to read it, the first paragraph, I had to outline it before it made sense
[01:01:20.120 --> 01:01:22.120]  Yeah, it's been cobbled together
[01:01:22.120 --> 01:01:28.120]  I liken it to one of those old houses that keeps getting added on
[01:01:28.120 --> 01:01:33.120]  Every generation, they put a few more rooms in this direction and go up and go out and over
[01:01:33.120 --> 01:01:36.120]  All built by different people at different times
[01:01:36.120 --> 01:01:39.120]  He's just saying that because he's been to my house
[01:01:39.120 --> 01:01:46.120]  As far as I can tell, the first part of it was put up in the mid to late 1800s
[01:01:46.120 --> 01:01:49.120]  And it's been added on two cents
[01:01:49.120 --> 01:01:51.120]  But yeah, it's kind of cobbled together like that
[01:01:51.120 --> 01:01:54.120]  Let me read these first couple of sentences
[01:01:54.120 --> 01:02:03.120]  What I'm arguing here is this applies to someone who is arrested outside of county
[01:02:03.120 --> 01:02:05.120]  And brought before a magistrate
[01:02:05.120 --> 01:02:08.120]  Duties of arresting officer and magistrate
[01:02:08.120 --> 01:02:15.120]  Now, you have to understand that the duties of the arresting officer and magistrate
[01:02:15.120 --> 01:02:19.120]  Are already addressed in other parts of the code
[01:02:19.120 --> 01:02:22.120]  So when you write this part of the code
[01:02:22.120 --> 01:02:29.120]  You have to make sure that it's in paramateria with the rest of the code
[01:02:29.120 --> 01:02:33.120]  Otherwise you run a foul
[01:02:33.120 --> 01:02:34.120]  Harmonious
[01:02:34.120 --> 01:02:37.120]  Run a foul of de Rousseau v. State
[01:02:37.120 --> 01:02:40.120]  Okay, it says in each case enumerated in this code
[01:02:40.120 --> 01:02:45.120]  The person making the arrest or the person having custody of the person arrested
[01:02:45.120 --> 01:02:50.120]  Shall without unnecessary delay but not later than 48 hours after the person is arrested
[01:02:50.120 --> 01:02:57.120]  Take the person arrested or have him taken before some magistrate of the county
[01:02:57.120 --> 01:02:59.120]  Where the accused was arrested
[01:02:59.120 --> 01:03:04.120]  Or to provide more expeditiously to the person arrested
[01:03:04.120 --> 01:03:11.120]  The warnings described in this article before a magistrate in any other county of this state
[01:03:11.120 --> 01:03:17.120]  The arrested person may be taken before the magistrate in person
[01:03:17.120 --> 01:03:22.120]  Or the image of the arrested person may be presented to the magistrate by means of video conference
[01:03:22.120 --> 01:03:24.120]  And they kind of do that
[01:03:24.120 --> 01:03:26.120]  This goes to my
[01:03:26.120 --> 01:03:29.120]  What I'm asking the courts to do is
[01:03:29.120 --> 01:03:31.120]  When a policeman arrests someone
[01:03:31.120 --> 01:03:34.120]  To get on their cell phone and call the magistrate immediately
[01:03:34.120 --> 01:03:39.120]  And have the magistrate do an examining trial right over the cell phone
[01:03:39.120 --> 01:03:41.120]  But this is specifically
[01:03:41.120 --> 01:03:44.120]  This was put into law long before there was such thing as an iPhone
[01:03:44.120 --> 01:03:45.120]  Yeah
[01:03:45.120 --> 01:03:48.120]  So now it should be even easier
[01:03:48.120 --> 01:03:49.120]  Exactly
[01:03:49.120 --> 01:03:55.120]  But before this addresses someone who's arrested
[01:03:55.120 --> 01:03:57.120]  And taken to the nearest magistrate
[01:03:57.120 --> 01:04:00.120]  Primarily when that magistrates out of county
[01:04:00.120 --> 01:04:06.120]  Or in a place where the magistrate doesn't have all the records and witnesses that he needs
[01:04:06.120 --> 01:04:11.120]  If and this will only go
[01:04:11.120 --> 01:04:16.120]  A person who was arrested on an existing warrant out of county
[01:04:16.120 --> 01:04:22.120]  It cannot go to someone arrested on a front on-site offense in county
[01:04:22.120 --> 01:04:27.120]  Because in that case under 14.06
[01:04:27.120 --> 01:04:32.120]  The officer is required to take the person directly to the nearest magistrate
[01:04:32.120 --> 01:04:37.120]  And the magistrate was required to hold an examining trial under chapter 16
[01:04:37.120 --> 01:04:42.120]  14.06 orders him to take him to the nearest magistrate
[01:04:42.120 --> 01:04:50.120]  Chapter 211 says when a magistrate says for the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation
[01:04:50.120 --> 01:04:52.120]  That is an examining court
[01:04:52.120 --> 01:04:55.120]  An examining court is addressed under chapter 16
[01:04:55.120 --> 01:04:57.120]  An examining trial
[01:04:57.120 --> 01:05:03.120]  But I'm seeing that 211 is applicable to both of those with or without a warrant
[01:05:03.120 --> 01:05:04.120]  Yes
[01:05:04.120 --> 01:05:08.120]  And in county or out of county I see it as applicable in every situation
[01:05:08.120 --> 01:05:11.120]  When somebody is dragged in front of a magistrate
[01:05:11.120 --> 01:05:13.120]  Physically or by video conference
[01:05:13.120 --> 01:05:17.120]  And the magistrate has a duty to inquire into the matter
[01:05:17.120 --> 01:05:21.120]  He also has a duty to give all these warnings
[01:05:21.120 --> 01:05:27.120]  Including to tell the defendant or the accused of his right to an examining trial
[01:05:27.120 --> 01:05:29.120]  They always skip that one
[01:05:29.120 --> 01:05:31.120]  And one more thing
[01:05:31.120 --> 01:05:35.120]  Under 16.04
[01:05:35.120 --> 01:05:40.120]  Before any evidence is presented to the court
[01:05:40.120 --> 01:05:45.120]  The accused shall be given opportunity to make a statement
[01:05:45.120 --> 01:05:49.120]  I know that's probably a bad idea
[01:05:49.120 --> 01:05:55.120]  But the primary thing I hear of you folks calling into this show
[01:05:55.120 --> 01:06:01.120]  Is mostly you just want to be heard
[01:06:01.120 --> 01:06:05.120]  You go to, you get charged, you get thrown in jail, you get run through the system
[01:06:05.120 --> 01:06:08.120]  Nobody ever wants to hear what happened
[01:06:08.120 --> 01:06:10.120]  Nobody cares
[01:06:10.120 --> 01:06:11.120]  They're going to get
[01:06:11.120 --> 01:06:14.120]  They're busy with their conveyor belt, they're ready to get paid
[01:06:14.120 --> 01:06:19.120]  16.04 is a primary requirement
[01:06:19.120 --> 01:06:25.120]  And it was put in there by our founders because they understood that
[01:06:25.120 --> 01:06:30.120]  Blind justice did not give the impression of justice
[01:06:30.120 --> 01:06:35.120]  Even if it was just, it did not give the impression of justice
[01:06:35.120 --> 01:06:38.120]  So first thing is you get to be heard
[01:06:38.120 --> 01:06:41.120]  That should be in 15.17
[01:06:41.120 --> 01:06:47.120]  15.17 is not in paramateria with the rest of the code
[01:06:47.120 --> 01:06:49.120]  It does not
[01:06:49.120 --> 01:06:54.120]  It's not in line with the rest of the code
[01:06:54.120 --> 01:06:56.120]  So I'm saying
[01:06:56.120 --> 01:07:00.120]  Our original argument was arraignment
[01:07:00.120 --> 01:07:04.120]  Here 15.17 doesn't speak to arraignment
[01:07:04.120 --> 01:07:07.120]  It speaks to examining trial
[01:07:07.120 --> 01:07:09.120]  And that's under chapter 16
[01:07:09.120 --> 01:07:13.120]  The person making the arrest or having custody of the arrested
[01:07:13.120 --> 01:07:17.120]  Shall, without unnecessary delay, but not later than 48 hours
[01:07:17.120 --> 01:07:22.120]  After the person is arrested, take the person arrested or have him taken before
[01:07:22.120 --> 01:07:26.120]  Some magistrate of the county where the accused was arrested
[01:07:26.120 --> 01:07:29.120]  Or to provide more expeditiously to the person arrested
[01:07:29.120 --> 01:07:32.120]  The warning is described by this article
[01:07:32.120 --> 01:07:37.120]  Before a magistrate in any other county of this state
[01:07:37.120 --> 01:07:43.120]  If you take someone before a magistrate in El Paso
[01:07:43.120 --> 01:07:49.120]  And he's charged with a crime in Randall County, Amarillo
[01:07:49.120 --> 01:07:53.120]  It will be very difficult for that magistrate to hold a proper examining trial
[01:07:53.120 --> 01:08:00.120]  Because the first thing is the person gets to be faced with his accuser
[01:08:00.120 --> 01:08:04.120]  And he gets to examine his accuser
[01:08:04.120 --> 01:08:10.120]  That magistrate has the power to attach witnesses
[01:08:10.120 --> 01:08:14.120]  Drag them in from the neighboring counties or anywhere he needs to
[01:08:14.120 --> 01:08:17.120]  So that attachment, it's convoluted
[01:08:17.120 --> 01:08:21.120]  It's possible, but it's better if it happens in the county
[01:08:21.120 --> 01:08:25.120]  In the alternative, he can just read the person's rights, set bail
[01:08:25.120 --> 01:08:29.120]  And then when the person gets back to the county of original jurisdiction
[01:08:29.120 --> 01:08:32.120]  Or where the charge is from
[01:08:32.120 --> 01:08:36.120]  Then, proper examining trial
[01:08:36.120 --> 01:08:38.120]  Oh, one more thing that I think is important
[01:08:38.120 --> 01:08:41.120]  You were talking about being able to make a statement first
[01:08:41.120 --> 01:08:45.120]  And that's an indicator of why it's important to have an examining trial
[01:08:45.120 --> 01:08:47.120]  And not just I find probable cause
[01:08:47.120 --> 01:08:49.120]  Another point about that that's really important
[01:08:49.120 --> 01:08:53.120]  That I think a lot of people overlook
[01:08:53.120 --> 01:08:55.120]  Is 1607
[01:08:55.120 --> 01:08:59.120]  1607 says that in the examining trial
[01:08:59.120 --> 01:09:02.120]  The rules of evidence apply
[01:09:02.120 --> 01:09:06.120]  Which means the cop's feelings, information and belief
[01:09:06.120 --> 01:09:09.120]  Well, I believe that he did this and this and that
[01:09:09.120 --> 01:09:14.120]  Well, that's good for trying to get the magistrate to drag
[01:09:14.120 --> 01:09:17.120]  The accused in front of the magistrate
[01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:19.120]  But once you're having the examining trial
[01:09:19.120 --> 01:09:22.120]  And the magistrate is actually inquiring into the matter
[01:09:22.120 --> 01:09:24.120]  The rules of evidence apply
[01:09:24.120 --> 01:09:28.120]  So the cop's feelings and belief are absolutely inadmissible
[01:09:28.120 --> 01:09:31.120]  He better have some facts
[01:09:31.120 --> 01:09:37.120]  Hearsay is sufficient to give the magistrate jurisdiction
[01:09:37.120 --> 01:09:40.120]  And hearsay being the way
[01:09:40.120 --> 01:09:44.120]  Texas is the only state I know that prescribes language
[01:09:44.120 --> 01:09:47.120]  For a criminal complaint
[01:09:47.120 --> 01:09:52.120]  It starts with a complaint must run in the name of the state of Texas
[01:09:52.120 --> 01:09:57.120]  And the form says in the name by the authority of the state of Texas
[01:09:57.120 --> 01:10:05.120]  And the accused must state that they have reason to believe and do believe
[01:10:05.120 --> 01:10:09.120]  That means hearsay evidence is sufficient
[01:10:09.120 --> 01:10:14.120]  For the purpose of initiating a criminal prosecution
[01:10:14.120 --> 01:10:16.120]  And if that's given to a magistrate
[01:10:16.120 --> 01:10:19.120]  He's commanded to issue a warrant
[01:10:19.120 --> 01:10:21.120]  But just for that purpose
[01:10:21.120 --> 01:10:24.120]  He can't hold an examining trial because the accused isn't there
[01:10:24.120 --> 01:10:28.120]  So the accused is to be arrested and brought before this magistrate
[01:10:28.120 --> 01:10:34.120]  That's why every criminal warrant you see will start with
[01:10:34.120 --> 01:10:40.120]  Arrest this person and bring him before me
[01:10:40.120 --> 01:10:44.120]  And that's because he issued the warrant
[01:10:44.120 --> 01:10:50.120]  He got jurisdiction to issue the warrant based on say criminal complaint
[01:10:50.120 --> 01:10:54.120]  Now the person is to be brought back before him
[01:10:54.120 --> 01:10:57.120]  And we have a proper examining trial where hearsay
[01:10:57.120 --> 01:11:00.120]  Where the rules of evidence matter
[01:11:00.120 --> 01:11:02.120]  No more hearsay
[01:11:02.120 --> 01:11:05.120]  That's only enough to get the door open
[01:11:05.120 --> 01:11:07.120]  That's our story, stick into it
[01:11:07.120 --> 01:11:09.120]  And we took longer than we intended to
[01:11:09.120 --> 01:11:13.120]  I hope we haven't bored everybody to tears
[01:11:13.120 --> 01:11:16.120]  But before we go to our sponsors
[01:11:16.120 --> 01:11:18.120]  We got a couple minutes
[01:11:18.120 --> 01:11:23.120]  Chris, what's your opinion?
[01:11:23.120 --> 01:11:26.120]  I'm sorry, I'm fascinated by what you're saying
[01:11:26.120 --> 01:11:29.120]  This is a lot of information to dump on tonight
[01:11:29.120 --> 01:11:37.120]  I'm trying to wrap my head around the Texas reference to what I'm dealing with as well
[01:11:37.120 --> 01:11:40.120]  Okay, let me say this part
[01:11:40.120 --> 01:11:43.120]  People say, how do you know all these laws?
[01:11:43.120 --> 01:11:46.120]  Well, I don't know exactly the year
[01:11:46.120 --> 01:11:55.120]  But the federal government contracted to have a model penal code created
[01:11:55.120 --> 01:12:00.120]  And then they promoted it to all the states and asked all the states to adopt it
[01:12:00.120 --> 01:12:02.120]  And all of them did but three
[01:12:02.120 --> 01:12:08.120]  But they already had a penal code that was so close, so similar it wasn't necessary
[01:12:08.120 --> 01:12:12.120]  So if it's in one code
[01:12:12.120 --> 01:12:17.120]  Some representation of it will be in all the other codes
[01:12:17.120 --> 01:12:21.120]  Because the codes themselves are so sophisticated
[01:12:22.120 --> 01:12:26.120]  So if you understand the concept
[01:12:26.120 --> 01:12:29.120]  Then you look in your code, you'll find it
[01:12:29.120 --> 01:12:33.120]  Some of the codes like Missouri's code was really difficult
[01:12:33.120 --> 01:12:38.120]  New Mexico's code was really difficult to find things
[01:12:38.120 --> 01:12:40.120]  But it was all in there
[01:12:40.120 --> 01:12:42.120]  It just wasn't straightforward
[01:12:42.120 --> 01:12:44.120]  So with that said
[01:12:44.120 --> 01:12:50.120]  What we're saying about Texas is going to be pretty close to California
[01:12:50.120 --> 01:12:52.120]  I mean to Colorado
[01:12:52.120 --> 01:12:55.120]  Because all of them have to follow the federal law
[01:12:55.120 --> 01:12:57.120]  Now I'm going to shut up
[01:12:57.120 --> 01:13:00.120]  Right, you mentioned Gerstein Pugh a while back too
[01:13:00.120 --> 01:13:02.120]  And I've been sitting on that case
[01:13:02.120 --> 01:13:05.120]  That's the one that says that you have to be...
[01:13:05.120 --> 01:13:07.120]  I forgot what it said
[01:13:07.120 --> 01:13:10.120]  Okay, what Gerstein Pugh says is a Florida case
[01:13:10.120 --> 01:13:14.120]  And Florida was not providing preliminary hearings
[01:13:14.120 --> 01:13:16.120]  Exactly
[01:13:17.120 --> 01:13:19.120]  Gerstein Pugh said
[01:13:19.120 --> 01:13:25.120]  We don't tell you how you must hold an initial hearing
[01:13:25.120 --> 01:13:28.120]  But you must hold one
[01:13:28.120 --> 01:13:31.120]  To make a determination if there's sufficient cause
[01:13:31.120 --> 01:13:33.120]  To believe that a crime has been committed
[01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:36.120]  And that the accused has committed the crime
[01:13:36.120 --> 01:13:39.120]  This is a requirement on every state
[01:13:39.120 --> 01:13:40.120]  So wait a second
[01:13:40.120 --> 01:13:43.120]  Are you telling me that they can't just
[01:13:43.120 --> 01:13:46.120]  Take the officer's statement and say
[01:13:46.120 --> 01:13:48.120]  I find probable cause
[01:13:48.120 --> 01:13:50.120]  Is that what you're telling me?
[01:13:50.120 --> 01:13:52.120]  That's exactly what I'm telling you
[01:13:52.120 --> 01:13:54.120]  And I plan to go to Houston
[01:13:54.120 --> 01:13:57.120]  And sit in Mr. Suit's court
[01:13:57.120 --> 01:13:59.120]  And ask the base for arrest
[01:14:13.120 --> 01:14:16.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[01:14:16.120 --> 01:14:19.120]  On how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[01:14:19.120 --> 01:14:23.120]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons
[01:14:23.120 --> 01:14:25.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[01:14:25.120 --> 01:14:28.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[01:14:28.120 --> 01:14:30.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them
[01:14:30.120 --> 01:14:32.120]  And make them pay you to go away
[01:14:32.120 --> 01:14:35.120]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution
[01:14:35.120 --> 01:14:37.120]  For how to stop debt collectors
[01:14:37.120 --> 01:14:39.120]  Personal consultation is available as well
[01:14:40.120 --> 01:14:43.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:14:43.120 --> 01:14:45.120]  And click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:14:45.120 --> 01:14:48.120]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[01:14:48.120 --> 01:14:50.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:14:50.120 --> 01:14:56.120]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:14:56.120 --> 01:14:59.120]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:14:59.120 --> 01:15:00.120]  I love logos
[01:15:00.120 --> 01:15:01.120]  Without the shows on this network
[01:15:01.120 --> 01:15:03.120]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends
[01:15:03.120 --> 01:15:05.120]  I'm so addicted to the truth now
[01:15:05.120 --> 01:15:06.120]  That there's no going back
[01:15:06.120 --> 01:15:07.120]  I need my truth fixed
[01:15:07.120 --> 01:15:08.120]  I'd be lost without logos
[01:15:08.120 --> 01:15:11.120]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air
[01:15:11.120 --> 01:15:13.120]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer
[01:15:13.120 --> 01:15:14.120]  But I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:15:14.120 --> 01:15:16.120]  And I really don't have any money to give
[01:15:16.120 --> 01:15:18.120]  Because I spend it all on supplements
[01:15:18.120 --> 01:15:20.120]  How can I help logos?
[01:15:20.120 --> 01:15:22.120]  Well, I'm glad you asked
[01:15:22.120 --> 01:15:24.120]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon
[01:15:24.120 --> 01:15:25.120]  You can help logos
[01:15:25.120 --> 01:15:27.120]  You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts
[01:15:27.120 --> 01:15:29.120]  First thing you do is clear your cookies
[01:15:29.120 --> 01:15:33.120]  Now go to logosradionetwork.com
[01:15:33.120 --> 01:15:36.120]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it
[01:15:36.120 --> 01:15:38.120]  Now when you order anything from Amazon
[01:15:38.120 --> 01:15:42.120]  You use that link and logos gets a few pesos
[01:15:42.120 --> 01:15:43.120]  Do I pay extra?
[01:15:43.120 --> 01:15:44.120]  No
[01:15:44.120 --> 01:15:46.120]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:15:46.120 --> 01:15:47.120]  No
[01:15:47.120 --> 01:15:48.120]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:15:48.120 --> 01:15:49.120]  No
[01:15:49.120 --> 01:15:50.120]  I mean, yes
[01:15:50.120 --> 01:15:53.120]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money
[01:15:53.120 --> 01:15:54.120]  This is perfect
[01:15:54.120 --> 01:15:56.120]  Thank you so much
[01:15:56.120 --> 01:15:57.120]  You're welcome
[01:15:57.120 --> 01:15:59.120]  Happy holidays, logos
[01:16:06.120 --> 01:16:07.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:07.120 --> 01:16:08.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:08.120 --> 01:16:09.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:09.120 --> 01:16:10.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:10.120 --> 01:16:11.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:11.120 --> 01:16:12.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:12.120 --> 01:16:13.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:13.120 --> 01:16:14.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:14.120 --> 01:16:15.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:15.120 --> 01:16:16.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:16.120 --> 01:16:17.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:17.120 --> 01:16:18.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:18.120 --> 01:16:19.120]  Thank you so much
[01:16:20.120 --> 01:16:22.120]  Don't fool me
[01:16:26.120 --> 01:16:28.120]  Well
[01:16:30.120 --> 01:16:35.120]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:35.120 --> 01:16:40.120]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan
[01:16:40.120 --> 01:16:43.120]  You put the fear in my pockets
[01:16:43.120 --> 01:16:45.120]  Took the money from my hand
[01:16:45.120 --> 01:16:50.120]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:54.120 --> 01:16:57.120]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:17:01.120 --> 01:17:03.120]  Okay, we are back
[01:17:03.120 --> 01:17:06.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Blue of Law Radio
[01:17:06.120 --> 01:17:10.120]  And we're going to Chris in Colorado
[01:17:10.120 --> 01:17:12.120]  Okay, Chris
[01:17:12.120 --> 01:17:14.120]  Oh, hold on, let me unmute you
[01:17:15.120 --> 01:17:16.120]  Okay, Chris
[01:17:16.120 --> 01:17:19.120]  What did you have for us today?
[01:17:21.120 --> 01:17:25.120]  I did what you guys instructed me to do
[01:17:25.120 --> 01:17:29.120]  And I started digging into the legislative record
[01:17:31.120 --> 01:17:34.120]  Oh, tell me you found something juicy in there
[01:17:34.120 --> 01:17:38.120]  Well, it's getting interesting
[01:17:38.120 --> 01:17:42.120]  Because when you listen to what the senators say
[01:17:42.120 --> 01:17:44.120]  When they're introducing a bill
[01:17:44.120 --> 01:17:47.120]  It definitely puts it in pretty clear context
[01:17:47.120 --> 01:17:50.120]  So it's not super juicy
[01:17:50.120 --> 01:17:52.120]  It's pretty benign actually
[01:17:52.120 --> 01:17:58.120]  But it's not about me actually from what I can tell
[01:17:58.120 --> 01:18:05.120]  So it's just coincidental that they decided to update this section of the statute this year
[01:18:05.120 --> 01:18:07.120]  But according to the history
[01:18:07.120 --> 01:18:12.120]  That particular section has been updated many times since 1970 whatever
[01:18:13.120 --> 01:18:17.120]  And while the rest of the statute
[01:18:17.120 --> 01:18:19.120]  Other points have just stayed
[01:18:19.120 --> 01:18:23.120]  So what happened in my case is that
[01:18:23.120 --> 01:18:27.120]  They, the argument was
[01:18:27.120 --> 01:18:30.120]  Okay, if two different hospital districts
[01:18:30.120 --> 01:18:33.120]  Which are government entities, i.e. county hospitals
[01:18:33.120 --> 01:18:37.120]  Need a service that will benefit both the districts
[01:18:37.120 --> 01:18:41.120]  They can enact a third entity
[01:18:42.120 --> 01:18:45.120]  Say it's like ambulance service or something like that
[01:18:45.120 --> 01:18:49.120]  And that entity will benefit both those districts
[01:18:49.120 --> 01:18:53.120]  The problem was the way the governmental notice statute was written
[01:18:53.120 --> 01:18:56.120]  Is that that third entity doesn't get government protections
[01:18:56.120 --> 01:18:58.120]  It was too vague or not clear
[01:18:58.120 --> 01:19:04.120]  So what they were doing is they were getting private malpractice insurance for that third entity
[01:19:04.120 --> 01:19:10.120]  When the first two had governmental immunity essentially protections
[01:19:12.120 --> 01:19:14.120]  It's interesting is that
[01:19:14.120 --> 01:19:18.120]  They pointed out though that the statute that was used against me
[01:19:18.120 --> 01:19:20.120]  Was basically vague
[01:19:20.120 --> 01:19:22.120]  And needed clarity as to that
[01:19:22.120 --> 01:19:24.120]  And then the judge
[01:19:24.120 --> 01:19:27.120]  Maybe the clerks looked it up and didn't look at the
[01:19:27.120 --> 01:19:31.120]  Because they got my case and they spent a month on it or a couple weeks on it
[01:19:31.120 --> 01:19:35.120]  And they looked at the statute and just assumed the 2024
[01:19:35.120 --> 01:19:37.120]  Which had just happened
[01:19:37.120 --> 01:19:39.120]  Was the valid one
[01:19:39.120 --> 01:19:41.120]  Realizing that my case was filed
[01:19:41.120 --> 01:19:44.120]  You know, eight months before this thing had ever happened
[01:19:44.120 --> 01:19:48.120]  So in the original statute it's very, very vague
[01:19:50.120 --> 01:19:52.120]  So that's what happened with mine
[01:19:52.120 --> 01:19:55.120]  And I'm still trying to parse through
[01:19:55.120 --> 01:19:59.120]  There was several house representatives that argued against it
[01:19:59.120 --> 01:20:01.120]  They didn't want it to pass because it was
[01:20:01.120 --> 01:20:05.120]  Their argument was it was giving the government far too much power
[01:20:06.120 --> 01:20:10.120]  And one of the house representatives actually said
[01:20:10.120 --> 01:20:15.120]  You know, it's hard enough for a private citizen to get any remedy against the government as it is
[01:20:15.120 --> 01:20:17.120]  It's a huge hurdle
[01:20:19.120 --> 01:20:22.120]  I'm glad they recognize that
[01:20:22.120 --> 01:20:23.120]  Yeah
[01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:30.120]  And then he says now you're giving them even more of a hurdle to get to remedy for being wronged
[01:20:30.120 --> 01:20:32.120]  And so there was some back and forth on that
[01:20:32.120 --> 01:20:34.120]  So I have some more videos to go through
[01:20:34.120 --> 01:20:36.120]  And then I'm going to start calling all those senators
[01:20:36.120 --> 01:20:38.120]  Well, there's only a couple senators
[01:20:38.120 --> 01:20:41.120]  But there's a lot more representatives in the House
[01:20:41.120 --> 01:20:46.120]  And see what they feel and what happened and what's really going on with this
[01:20:46.120 --> 01:20:49.120]  So that's not real juicy probably
[01:20:49.120 --> 01:20:54.120]  But it is interesting because it kind of cracks the door open for me
[01:20:54.120 --> 01:20:58.120]  Because if it's that vague that they needed to address it this year
[01:20:58.120 --> 01:21:03.120]  Then how is the average citizen possibly going to get passed?
[01:21:03.120 --> 01:21:08.120]  Okay, since this is such new legislation
[01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:13.120]  While you were speaking I got this crazy idea
[01:21:13.120 --> 01:21:16.120]  You're speaking to the legislative intent
[01:21:16.120 --> 01:21:17.120]  Yes
[01:21:17.120 --> 01:21:23.120]  Wood, do you think that perhaps one of these legislators who would want to
[01:21:24.120 --> 01:21:28.120]  Get some coverage before his constituents
[01:21:28.120 --> 01:21:33.120]  Would be willing to testify to the legislative intent in your case?
[01:21:35.120 --> 01:21:36.120]  Either by
[01:21:36.120 --> 01:21:37.120]  Oh wow
[01:21:37.120 --> 01:21:39.120]  By appearance or by deposition
[01:21:40.120 --> 01:21:41.120]  Well, that's a good point
[01:21:41.120 --> 01:21:43.120]  I could force them to do it
[01:21:43.120 --> 01:21:45.120]  But there's also video of them explaining it
[01:21:45.120 --> 01:21:49.120]  No, I'm saying everything's political
[01:21:50.120 --> 01:21:51.120]  Oh
[01:21:51.120 --> 01:21:55.120]  If you give a politician an opportunity to grandstand
[01:22:02.120 --> 01:22:04.120]  Good point
[01:22:04.120 --> 01:22:06.120]  I could probably get 10 of them
[01:22:06.120 --> 01:22:08.120]  There's like so I don't know
[01:22:08.120 --> 01:22:10.120]  There's like 40 or 50 representatives
[01:22:10.120 --> 01:22:13.120]  And is it that many per state?
[01:22:13.120 --> 01:22:15.120]  There's a lot, isn't there?
[01:22:15.120 --> 01:22:16.120]  Yes
[01:22:16.120 --> 01:22:17.120]  Okay
[01:22:17.120 --> 01:22:19.120]  So there's like 20 that did nays
[01:22:19.120 --> 01:22:21.120]  Or 18 or 19 that did nays
[01:22:21.120 --> 01:22:23.120]  There's quite a few
[01:22:25.120 --> 01:22:27.120]  It wasn't a huge margin that this thing passed by
[01:22:27.120 --> 01:22:28.120]  But it did pass
[01:22:28.120 --> 01:22:32.120]  And it was such a formality the way it was described
[01:22:32.120 --> 01:22:34.120]  You know, let's just clarify
[01:22:34.120 --> 01:22:39.120]  But in my view it does crack open the door
[01:22:39.120 --> 01:22:41.120]  And I'm going to push it
[01:22:41.120 --> 01:22:43.120]  I had some other points I was trying to remember
[01:22:43.120 --> 01:22:48.120]  This is complex legislation
[01:22:48.120 --> 01:22:50.120]  And since it's so new
[01:22:50.120 --> 01:22:54.120]  You have the actual legislators there
[01:22:54.120 --> 01:22:57.120]  That would really be innovative
[01:22:59.120 --> 01:23:02.120]  That would likely get you a lot of coverage
[01:23:04.120 --> 01:23:09.120]  So are you saying getting the legislators who were not in favor of it
[01:23:09.120 --> 01:23:13.120]  Or just get any legislator to give clarity on it?
[01:23:13.120 --> 01:23:16.120]  I would say the ones not in favor of it
[01:23:17.120 --> 01:23:18.120]  Okay
[01:23:18.120 --> 01:23:20.120]  Yeah, that was my thought too
[01:23:20.120 --> 01:23:23.120]  Would be more likely to speak in your favor
[01:23:23.120 --> 01:23:27.120]  And be more likely to want to have the
[01:23:27.120 --> 01:23:29.120]  What's the term?
[01:23:29.120 --> 01:23:31.120]  I don't want to say theater
[01:23:31.120 --> 01:23:32.120]  What do you call it?
[01:23:32.120 --> 01:23:33.120]  Visibility
[01:23:33.120 --> 01:23:34.120]  Visibility
[01:23:34.120 --> 01:23:38.120]  The public to be able to see what are they standing for
[01:23:38.120 --> 01:23:40.120]  Oh, see, we're on your side
[01:23:40.120 --> 01:23:42.120]  We're for the people
[01:23:43.120 --> 01:23:46.120]  That's free exposure
[01:23:46.120 --> 01:23:49.120]  That puts you, you will be on the record
[01:23:51.120 --> 01:23:54.120]  They could point to their record in the court
[01:23:55.120 --> 01:23:57.120]  To where they went before the court
[01:23:57.120 --> 01:24:01.120]  And explained the legislative intent to the court
[01:24:01.120 --> 01:24:06.120]  If you get a legislator to explain the legislative intent to the court
[01:24:06.120 --> 01:24:08.120]  The court has to listen
[01:24:08.120 --> 01:24:11.120]  This is not something they can just pass on
[01:24:12.120 --> 01:24:13.120]  Right
[01:24:14.120 --> 01:24:16.120]  That's as definitive as it gets
[01:24:16.120 --> 01:24:19.120]  Let the other side bring the opposing legislator
[01:24:19.120 --> 01:24:21.120]  Wouldn't that be cool?
[01:24:24.120 --> 01:24:25.120]  Give them both
[01:24:25.120 --> 01:24:26.120]  I love it
[01:24:27.120 --> 01:24:30.120]  Yeah, well they realize I'm going this far with it
[01:24:30.120 --> 01:24:32.120]  They're going to panic and we'll see what happens
[01:24:32.120 --> 01:24:33.120]  But I think you're right
[01:24:33.120 --> 01:24:37.120]  I think at this point it's time to start getting the public
[01:24:37.120 --> 01:24:39.120]  To hear exactly what's going on
[01:24:39.120 --> 01:24:41.120]  Because they're too damn busy to check in and all this stuff
[01:24:41.120 --> 01:24:44.120]  So we actually need to sound the horn across the land
[01:24:44.120 --> 01:24:46.120]  So they can hear what's going on
[01:24:46.120 --> 01:24:48.120]  Let me explain my position on it
[01:24:48.120 --> 01:24:50.120]  I hate the public
[01:24:50.120 --> 01:24:52.120]  I hate the media
[01:24:53.120 --> 01:24:54.120]  They suck
[01:24:54.120 --> 01:24:55.120]  Big time
[01:24:55.120 --> 01:24:56.120]  Yes
[01:24:56.120 --> 01:24:58.120]  That's not what I find it interesting
[01:24:58.120 --> 01:25:03.120]  You put a legislator in front of the judge
[01:25:04.120 --> 01:25:10.120]  The judge's duty is to enforce the intent of the legislature
[01:25:10.120 --> 01:25:15.120]  And very often the judges enforce their own intent
[01:25:15.120 --> 01:25:18.120]  Instead of the intent of the legislature
[01:25:18.120 --> 01:25:25.120]  But their specific requirement is to enforce the intent of the legislature
[01:25:25.120 --> 01:25:31.120]  And if a legislator comes before them and states on the record
[01:25:31.120 --> 01:25:37.120]  The legislative intent, that is not something he can ignore
[01:25:38.120 --> 01:25:42.120]  You're going to have a judge on his toes
[01:25:42.120 --> 01:25:47.120]  And you're going to have a legislator in a great place to grandstand
[01:25:48.120 --> 01:25:52.120]  And you're going to have opposing counsel shaking in his boots
[01:25:52.120 --> 01:25:56.120]  Oh yeah, go ahead and cross-examine this legislator
[01:25:56.120 --> 01:25:58.120]  He's likely to eat your lunch
[01:26:04.120 --> 01:26:07.120]  Constructing this moving forward
[01:26:07.120 --> 01:26:09.120]  One of my next questions was
[01:26:09.120 --> 01:26:11.120]  I've got all these arguments
[01:26:11.120 --> 01:26:16.120]  I've got the judge retroactively using a new law against me in the past
[01:26:16.120 --> 01:26:18.120]  Which I don't think you can legally do
[01:26:18.120 --> 01:26:20.120]  That's called expo facto
[01:26:20.120 --> 01:26:22.120]  Expo facto?
[01:26:22.120 --> 01:26:24.120]  Expo facto, look that up
[01:26:24.120 --> 01:26:28.120]  Post, ex, post facto
[01:26:28.120 --> 01:26:30.120]  Ex-post facto
[01:26:30.120 --> 01:26:32.120]  Post meaning after, after the fact
[01:26:32.120 --> 01:26:34.120]  Before the fact, after the fact
[01:26:35.120 --> 01:26:37.120]  Is it after the fact, before the fact?
[01:26:37.120 --> 01:26:38.120]  It's one way or the other
[01:26:38.120 --> 01:26:40.120]  But anyway, that's specifically forbidden
[01:26:41.120 --> 01:26:44.120]  Can't take a new law and apply it retroactively
[01:26:44.120 --> 01:26:46.120]  Absolutely forbidden
[01:26:46.120 --> 01:26:48.120]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain
[01:26:48.120 --> 01:26:50.120]  The rules of our radio
[01:26:50.120 --> 01:26:52.120]  We'll be right back
[01:26:53.120 --> 01:26:55.120]  In five seconds
[01:26:55.120 --> 01:26:57.120]  Okay, I blew my timing again
[01:27:00.120 --> 01:27:02.120]  Sorry soft drink lovers
[01:27:02.120 --> 01:27:04.120]  Even diet drinks can make you fat
[01:27:04.120 --> 01:27:10.120]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff
[01:27:10.120 --> 01:27:11.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:27:11.120 --> 01:27:15.120]  And I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas
[01:27:15.120 --> 01:27:17.120]  Privacy is under attack
[01:27:17.120 --> 01:27:21.120]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:27:21.120 --> 01:27:25.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:27:25.120 --> 01:27:27.120]  So protect your rights
[01:27:27.120 --> 01:27:31.120]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:27:31.120 --> 01:27:33.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:27:33.120 --> 01:27:37.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[01:27:37.120 --> 01:27:41.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[01:27:41.120 --> 01:27:43.120]  Start over with Startpage
[01:27:44.120 --> 01:27:49.120]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong
[01:27:49.120 --> 01:27:54.120]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade
[01:27:54.120 --> 01:28:01.120]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all
[01:28:01.120 --> 01:28:05.120]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite
[01:28:05.120 --> 01:28:08.120]  But unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it
[01:28:08.120 --> 01:28:14.120]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake
[01:28:14.120 --> 01:28:17.120]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight
[01:28:17.120 --> 01:28:22.120]  And if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead
[01:28:22.120 --> 01:28:24.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:28:24.120 --> 01:28:27.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:28:29.120 --> 01:28:34.120]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:28:34.120 --> 01:28:36.120]  The government says that fire brought it down
[01:28:36.120 --> 01:28:41.120]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:28:41.120 --> 01:28:44.120]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:28:44.120 --> 01:28:47.120]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[01:28:47.120 --> 01:28:48.120]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[01:28:48.120 --> 01:28:49.120]  I'm a structural engineer
[01:28:49.120 --> 01:28:51.120]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[01:28:51.120 --> 01:28:52.120]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:28:52.120 --> 01:28:53.120]  I'm a father who lost his son
[01:28:53.120 --> 01:28:56.120]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth
[01:28:56.120 --> 01:28:59.120]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:29:00.120 --> 01:29:03.120]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[01:29:04.120 --> 01:29:06.120]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[01:29:06.120 --> 01:29:08.120]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society
[01:29:08.120 --> 01:29:11.120]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[01:29:11.120 --> 01:29:14.120]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[01:29:14.120 --> 01:29:16.120]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[01:29:16.120 --> 01:29:18.120]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[01:29:18.120 --> 01:29:24.120]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[01:29:24.120 --> 01:29:27.120]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[01:29:27.120 --> 01:29:30.120]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:29:30.120 --> 01:29:32.120]  That will help you understand what due process is
[01:29:32.120 --> 01:29:34.120]  And how to hold courts to the rule of law
[01:29:34.120 --> 01:29:36.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:29:36.120 --> 01:29:39.120]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[01:29:39.120 --> 01:29:41.120]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[01:29:41.120 --> 01:29:44.120]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[01:29:44.120 --> 01:29:46.120]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[01:29:46.120 --> 01:29:49.120]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:29:49.120 --> 01:29:53.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[01:29:53.120 --> 01:29:58.120]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[01:30:01.120 --> 01:30:04.120]  Looking for some truth? You found it!
[01:30:04.120 --> 01:30:07.120]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:30:30.120 --> 01:30:40.120]  The wicked come with temptations
[01:30:40.120 --> 01:30:45.120]  They're trying to buy the whole place
[01:30:45.120 --> 01:30:51.120]  They want to poison the nation
[01:30:51.120 --> 01:30:56.120]  Because they've fallen from grace
[01:30:57.120 --> 01:31:03.120]  I will not drink from that cup
[01:31:03.120 --> 01:31:08.120]  I just can't act that way
[01:31:08.120 --> 01:31:13.120]  They got this problem they're dreaming of
[01:31:13.120 --> 01:31:16.120]  And I won't be the slave come what may
[01:31:16.120 --> 01:31:20.120]  Okay, we are back. Randy Carlson, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:27.120]  On this Friday, the 25th day of October 2024
[01:31:27.120 --> 01:31:30.120]  And we're talking to Chris in Colorado
[01:31:30.120 --> 01:31:34.120]  And on the break, Brett and I had a great time
[01:31:34.120 --> 01:31:44.120]  Plotting on how we can craft claims in a way that will allow us to reasonably
[01:31:44.120 --> 01:31:52.120]  Subpoena a legislator to explain to the court legislative intent
[01:31:52.120 --> 01:31:55.120]  Or even do a deposition
[01:31:55.120 --> 01:31:58.120]  That would be good really
[01:31:58.120 --> 01:32:02.120]  He wouldn't have to travel but he'd have depositions recorded
[01:32:02.120 --> 01:32:04.120]  It's admissible evidence
[01:32:04.120 --> 01:32:07.120]  A zoom deposition
[01:32:08.120 --> 01:32:18.120]  Get him some good moments that he could put out to the news
[01:32:18.120 --> 01:32:23.120]  This is your legislator at work
[01:32:23.120 --> 01:32:29.120]  But the idea to have a legislator explain legislative intent to the court
[01:32:29.120 --> 01:32:33.120]  Okay, go ahead Chris, we're having too much fun with this
[01:32:33.120 --> 01:32:41.120]  It is exciting because we're getting down to the fine grain of how this all works
[01:32:41.120 --> 01:32:46.120]  And actually in a way surpassing their actual abilities
[01:32:46.120 --> 01:32:52.120]  And I don't want to overstep this but when you start to see that there's a lot of holes
[01:32:52.120 --> 01:32:54.120]  And their theories and the reason
[01:32:54.120 --> 01:32:57.120]  Because these are average people like you and I
[01:32:57.120 --> 01:32:59.120]  And they put it together the best they can
[01:32:59.120 --> 01:33:05.120]  And when you start to realize that the best they can do isn't all that great in some situations
[01:33:05.120 --> 01:33:07.120]  You understand why a lot of this is so bad
[01:33:07.120 --> 01:33:12.120]  I'm a little more biased and I'm trying to look for like evil intent
[01:33:12.120 --> 01:33:17.120]  And when I started to watch those videos I started to realize it isn't really like that
[01:33:17.120 --> 01:33:23.120]  There might be a sleeper in there somewhere but generally it's just people trying to do good things
[01:33:24.120 --> 01:33:30.120]  I can't tell you how glad I am to hear you say that
[01:33:30.120 --> 01:33:33.120]  Because I'm not religious at all
[01:33:33.120 --> 01:33:36.120]  And Brett will attest to that fact
[01:33:36.120 --> 01:33:43.120]  But I find great cultural wisdom in the ancient texts
[01:33:43.120 --> 01:33:49.120]  In the Bible where it says judge not that he be not judged
[01:33:49.120 --> 01:33:54.120]  Set all the religious stuff aside
[01:33:54.120 --> 01:33:58.120]  In a human culture
[01:33:58.120 --> 01:34:02.120]  That works very well
[01:34:02.120 --> 01:34:06.120]  If I cannot demonize the police
[01:34:06.120 --> 01:34:11.120]  If I can't call them evil and then wash my hands of them
[01:34:11.120 --> 01:34:15.120]  Now maybe Jesus and God can do that
[01:34:15.120 --> 01:34:19.120]  They can do that stuff, but they told us not to
[01:34:19.120 --> 01:34:23.120]  So if I can't demonize them, what have I got left?
[01:34:23.120 --> 01:34:28.120]  If they're not evil, they may be, but I can't think of them as evil
[01:34:28.120 --> 01:34:33.120]  Then how do I think of them? I have to think of them as wrong
[01:34:33.120 --> 01:34:37.120]  And if I think of them as wrong
[01:34:37.120 --> 01:34:44.120]  Then that kind of implies my duty to figure out how they're wrong
[01:34:44.120 --> 01:34:49.120]  And when I do that, that reflects the duty on me
[01:34:49.120 --> 01:34:53.120]  To let them know how they're wrong
[01:34:53.120 --> 01:34:59.120]  When I started thinking of the police not as a bunch of bad guys out to get us
[01:34:59.120 --> 01:35:04.120]  But just a bunch of human beings stuck inside a system they did not create
[01:35:04.120 --> 01:35:08.120]  And I go at them from the perspective that at the end of the day
[01:35:08.120 --> 01:35:11.120]  Everybody wants to be a good guy
[01:35:11.120 --> 01:35:15.120]  Okay, maybe everybody doesn't, there are a few psychopaths out there, but they're rare
[01:35:15.120 --> 01:35:18.120]  Yeah, very good, yeah
[01:35:18.120 --> 01:35:20.120]  Most people want to be good guys
[01:35:20.120 --> 01:35:28.120]  You get police who spend all their time dealing with approximately 6% of the population
[01:35:28.120 --> 01:35:31.120]  They threw me in jail once, the judge was P. O. Dabby
[01:35:31.120 --> 01:35:34.120]  I spent seven days in jail for contempt
[01:35:34.120 --> 01:35:40.120]  And he brought these two guys in that were entranced from one prison to another
[01:35:40.120 --> 01:35:49.120]  And all they could talk about all day long was what they were going to have for their next meal
[01:35:49.120 --> 01:35:53.120]  And the caper they were going to pull when they got out of jail
[01:35:53.120 --> 01:35:54.120]  Wow
[01:35:54.120 --> 01:35:56.120]  That's all that was in their mind
[01:35:56.120 --> 01:35:59.120]  And I listened to these guys and said, holy mackerel
[01:35:59.120 --> 01:36:06.120]  If I was a policeman and I had to deal with these crazy people one after the other after the other
[01:36:06.120 --> 01:36:09.120]  I can't be a policeman
[01:36:09.120 --> 01:36:12.120]  I would get just like those guys
[01:36:12.120 --> 01:36:18.120]  I would stop one of us who's not part of that 96%, but how the heck do I know that?
[01:36:18.120 --> 01:36:27.120]  So I'm going to treat everybody as if they are one of these guys that if I don't watch exactly every move
[01:36:27.120 --> 01:36:29.120]  They'll pull a gun and shoot me
[01:36:29.120 --> 01:36:32.120]  I watched a video of a female policeman
[01:36:32.120 --> 01:36:37.120]  Guy is parked in a parking lot of a place that's closed at two in the morning
[01:36:37.120 --> 01:36:42.120]  She walks up beside the car and stands by the post just slightly behind him
[01:36:42.120 --> 01:36:49.120]  And she's talking to him and in an instant bullet went right past her face
[01:36:49.120 --> 01:36:57.120]  But she was back just far enough so that he couldn't turn far enough to hit her
[01:36:57.120 --> 01:37:04.120]  And she used her pistol with prejudice
[01:37:04.120 --> 01:37:09.120]  But just in an instant, they never know
[01:37:09.120 --> 01:37:11.120]  They don't know that you're a good guy
[01:37:11.120 --> 01:37:13.120]  They don't know that you're an ordinary person
[01:37:13.120 --> 01:37:17.120]  Yeah, they pull people over that look like ordinary people all the time and then crazy stuff happens
[01:37:17.120 --> 01:37:28.120]  So when we start thinking of them as human beings and having reasons for what they're doing even if we don't like them
[01:37:28.120 --> 01:37:35.120]  Then we start on a path to remedy just like you're talking about with these legislators
[01:37:35.120 --> 01:37:39.120]  I'm really glad to hear that
[01:37:39.120 --> 01:37:46.120]  It's humbling because we think they're all incompetent and they're all plotting against us
[01:37:46.120 --> 01:37:49.120]  And it's not so much that that's their intention
[01:37:49.120 --> 01:37:51.120]  That's part of the design of the system
[01:37:51.120 --> 01:37:53.120]  I think that's really our problem
[01:37:53.120 --> 01:37:59.120]  And you're right, Randy, it's just what they stepped into for one reason or another
[01:37:59.120 --> 01:38:00.120]  But it's heavily flawed
[01:38:00.120 --> 01:38:04.120]  It's clear that it's heavily flawed and I think they know that to some degree
[01:38:04.120 --> 01:38:07.120]  And they're just doing the best they can with the resources they have
[01:38:07.120 --> 01:38:10.120]  Now with that said, let me say this
[01:38:10.120 --> 01:38:22.120]  I have never seen so many legislative sessions for such a small state of people stacked almost every other day and dozens throughout the day
[01:38:22.120 --> 01:38:26.120]  I mean, it's insane how much time they spend talking on stuff
[01:38:26.120 --> 01:38:29.120]  I don't know how they get anything done
[01:38:29.120 --> 01:38:34.120]  And I giggled with one of the clerks or the people who was in the Wyoming legislature
[01:38:34.120 --> 01:38:37.120]  And I'm like, how do you fish through? How do you get anything done?
[01:38:37.120 --> 01:38:39.120]  She giggles, she's like, I know, it's a lot
[01:38:39.120 --> 01:38:42.120]  So it's not efficient either
[01:38:42.120 --> 01:38:49.120]  So I don't know how they get to where they need to get to which benefits everybody
[01:38:49.120 --> 01:38:51.120]  And what they're really trying to do
[01:38:51.120 --> 01:38:54.120]  It seems very redundant in many ways
[01:38:54.120 --> 01:38:58.120]  And then once you enact all these things, how do you keep up with all of them?
[01:38:58.120 --> 01:39:02.120]  That's where we come in, in some degree, kind of what you're saying
[01:39:02.120 --> 01:39:08.120]  But anyway, I just stepped into a whole new realm of understanding of what goes on behind this process and it's immense
[01:39:08.120 --> 01:39:11.120]  But with that said, yes, I think they're trying to do the best they could
[01:39:11.120 --> 01:39:17.120]  And everybody was very polite and they brought in witnesses and people who gave opportunity for the public to speak
[01:39:17.120 --> 01:39:22.120]  Obviously, not many of the public shows up, but they have the opportunity to show up by video
[01:39:22.120 --> 01:39:24.120]  And they listen
[01:39:24.120 --> 01:39:28.120]  If you're a business owner from town and you don't like a bill and you come in and you give your expertise
[01:39:28.120 --> 01:39:31.120]  You can give your expertise
[01:39:31.120 --> 01:39:41.120]  Yes, and I was at the Senate criminal justice hearings by the Senate criminal justice committee
[01:39:42.120 --> 01:39:47.120]  I'm in a state of 29 million people at the time
[01:39:47.120 --> 01:39:52.120]  And 140-something people showed up
[01:39:52.120 --> 01:39:56.120]  110 of them were lobbyists
[01:39:56.120 --> 01:40:00.120]  36 citizens showed up
[01:40:00.120 --> 01:40:09.120]  Now these senators were sitting up there pulling their nose hairs, cleaning their ear, texting on their cell phone
[01:40:09.120 --> 01:40:12.120]  When all these lobbyists are talking to them
[01:40:12.120 --> 01:40:18.120]  When a citizen got up and spoke to them, they set up and they paid attention
[01:40:18.120 --> 01:40:22.120]  I took Eddie Craig with me
[01:40:22.120 --> 01:40:28.120]  And that's when I first brought to Eddie Craig 2202b2a
[01:40:28.120 --> 01:40:36.120]  They're trying to increase official misconduct to a felony if there was bodily injury
[01:40:37.120 --> 01:40:44.120]  And the prosecutor told them all they could charge these cops with was a Class A misdemeanor
[01:40:44.120 --> 01:40:47.120]  And Eddie Craig read them the riot act
[01:40:47.120 --> 01:40:49.120]  Oh, it was delicious
[01:40:49.120 --> 01:40:53.120]  But one person can have major impact
[01:40:53.120 --> 01:40:57.120]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, you'll be right back
[01:40:58.120 --> 01:41:02.120]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[01:41:02.120 --> 01:41:06.120]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[01:41:06.120 --> 01:41:10.120]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[01:41:10.120 --> 01:41:17.120]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[01:41:17.120 --> 01:41:23.120]  The CHAMP plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan
[01:41:23.120 --> 01:41:32.120]  That provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay
[01:41:32.120 --> 01:41:38.120]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes
[01:41:38.120 --> 01:41:44.120]  As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes
[01:41:44.120 --> 01:41:51.120]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit
[01:41:51.120 --> 01:41:59.120]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com
[01:41:59.120 --> 01:42:03.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:03.120 --> 01:42:06.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[01:42:06.120 --> 01:42:14.120]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[01:42:14.120 --> 01:42:18.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:42:18.120 --> 01:42:22.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[01:42:22.120 --> 01:42:27.120]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too
[01:42:27.120 --> 01:42:33.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[01:42:33.120 --> 01:42:42.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:42:42.120 --> 01:42:51.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[01:42:51.120 --> 01:43:00.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:43:12.120 --> 01:43:18.120]  It's good and good to follow you
[01:43:18.120 --> 01:43:26.120]  Yeah baby Jerry, see reality
[01:43:26.120 --> 01:43:29.120]  How can cameras lurk around the corner?
[01:43:29.120 --> 01:43:31.120]  Sing Jerry, come!
[01:43:31.120 --> 01:43:38.120]  As we sow, so shall we reap
[01:43:38.120 --> 01:43:42.120]  Okay, we are back, Brent Kelton, Brent Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:43:42.120 --> 01:43:46.120]  We're talking to Chris in Colorado
[01:43:46.120 --> 01:43:52.120]  Okay Chris, we're having fun with this idea, I really like it
[01:43:52.120 --> 01:44:02.120]  On the break, I was telling Brent about taking Eddie Craig to a Senate subcommittee hearing
[01:44:02.120 --> 01:44:09.120]  Anybody of you ever listen to Eddie Craig, you know he used to be a hellfire and brimstone Baptist preacher
[01:44:09.120 --> 01:44:14.120]  And we went before a Senate subcommittee, criminal justice Senate subcommittee
[01:44:14.120 --> 01:44:25.120]  Where they were trying to increase official misconduct to a felony if the police did something that caused grievous bodily injury
[01:44:25.120 --> 01:44:33.120]  Eddie said, chased a 12 year old boy, he stopped and laid down and they kicked and stomped on him for a minute and 20 seconds
[01:44:33.120 --> 01:44:35.120]  And Houston was outraged
[01:44:35.120 --> 01:44:44.120]  And the prosecutor got up in front of this Senate subcommittee and told them the only thing we could charge the officers with was Class A misdemeanor official misconduct
[01:44:44.120 --> 01:44:54.120]  Eddie got up in front of them and pulled out his hellfire and brimstone tools and read them the riot act
[01:44:54.120 --> 01:44:57.120]  Oh, it was glorious
[01:44:57.120 --> 01:44:59.120]  Wow, beautiful
[01:44:59.120 --> 01:45:09.120]  Did he tell them not only the things that the officer was doing wrong, those crimes, but also that the lying prosecutor was shielding from prosecution
[01:45:09.120 --> 01:45:13.120]  He pointed right in his face, you see this prosecutor here?
[01:45:13.120 --> 01:45:18.120]  He got up here and he looked you right in the eye and he lied like a dog
[01:45:18.120 --> 01:45:22.120]  He said the only thing he could charge him with was Class A misdemeanor official oppression
[01:45:22.120 --> 01:45:30.120]  Now you've got 12 senators up there, they're not picking their nose and cleaning their ear and checking that they are sitting up and listening
[01:45:30.120 --> 01:45:39.120]  He could have charged him with first degree felony, aggravated assault, criminal violation, 2202B2A and he should have
[01:45:39.120 --> 01:45:42.120]  And oh man, it was glorious
[01:45:42.120 --> 01:45:51.120]  One person at these legislative hearings, citizens can have an incredible impact
[01:45:51.120 --> 01:45:56.120]  He got in the head of every one of these senators
[01:45:56.120 --> 01:46:02.120]  One person in a state of 29 billion
[01:46:02.120 --> 01:46:09.120]  You should go to Senate subcommittee hearings just to watch what goes on
[01:46:09.120 --> 01:46:17.120]  And if you have an interest in legislation, you should talk to your legislators in those committees
[01:46:17.120 --> 01:46:22.120]  It goes on the record, you will have their attention
[01:46:22.120 --> 01:46:25.120]  I'm getting off the soapbox now, go ahead Chris
[01:46:25.120 --> 01:46:31.120]  Well my concern is how do you keep up with all these bills? There's so many
[01:46:31.120 --> 01:46:37.120]  And that's the thing is we can't reasonably keep up with them
[01:46:37.120 --> 01:46:41.120]  And that's what I don't know how to go about
[01:46:41.120 --> 01:46:44.120]  We have an election coming up
[01:46:44.120 --> 01:46:52.120]  Have you looked at all of the bills that are proposed in your state for this election cycle?
[01:46:52.120 --> 01:46:57.120]  God no, I can barely keep up with my normal life, let alone do that
[01:46:57.120 --> 01:47:01.120]  Me either, and I do have to do that before I vote
[01:47:01.120 --> 01:47:04.120]  Every time I've done that I've been really glad that I did
[01:47:04.120 --> 01:47:10.120]  But nobody says to us, remember go look at all of these different bills that are up in Texas
[01:47:10.120 --> 01:47:15.120]  We have, secession is on the ballot
[01:47:15.120 --> 01:47:22.120]  And I don't want Texas to secede from the union, but I'm going to vote for it
[01:47:22.120 --> 01:47:28.120]  I don't think even if secession wins that Texas will secede
[01:47:28.120 --> 01:47:37.120]  But I do want Texas to have that issue to wave in front of the federal government
[01:47:37.120 --> 01:47:41.120]  Go ahead, screw with us
[01:47:41.120 --> 01:47:48.120]  You want to open our border? Well we'll throw your behinds out and close it ourselves
[01:47:48.120 --> 01:47:55.120]  So read what's on there, you may find things that you consider very interesting
[01:47:55.120 --> 01:48:01.120]  Okay, I'm going to get off the political soapbox
[01:48:01.120 --> 01:48:03.120]  Go ahead Chris
[01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:09.120]  Everything that's on the ballot, so we have a kind of a decent synopsis of all the things that we would be voting for
[01:48:09.120 --> 01:48:12.120]  So I plan to read that
[01:48:12.120 --> 01:48:21.120]  But the fine details behind everything, again, bills can be two pages long and they can be 2,000 pages long
[01:48:21.120 --> 01:48:26.120]  So it's generally I guess on a state level they wouldn't be 2,000
[01:48:26.120 --> 01:48:33.120]  But anyway, it is fascinating, I'm glad to be finally way late in life getting into it
[01:48:33.120 --> 01:48:38.120]  Because it shows that the power really lies in our hands
[01:48:38.120 --> 01:48:42.120]  And like you said, we have to yield that power to make an effect
[01:48:42.120 --> 01:48:47.120]  And that's not really taught to us, we're not empowered throughout school to do this
[01:48:47.120 --> 01:48:51.120]  Which is really unfortunate, I think that's also part of the design
[01:48:52.120 --> 01:48:56.120]  So back to, I guess back to one of my original questions
[01:48:56.120 --> 01:49:04.120]  I have a good feeling, there's a high probability based on all this that the appellate court is going to kick it back down to the trial court
[01:49:04.120 --> 01:49:10.120]  And then I'm going to have to, he's going to have to e-crow or I'm going to get another judge and we're going to move forward with this
[01:49:10.120 --> 01:49:14.120]  But let's just say the appellate court doesn't do it
[01:49:15.120 --> 01:49:20.120]  How do I set up my brief or I should say now I'm moving into my reply
[01:49:20.120 --> 01:49:27.120]  And I'm going to have to do a supplemental brief because of this new ex post, what is it, would you call it ex something post?
[01:49:27.120 --> 01:49:34.120]  What is it where it's not ex post facto, ex post facto
[01:49:34.120 --> 01:49:36.120]  Yes, I just looked it up
[01:49:36.120 --> 01:49:41.120]  And that's a big deal actually, the judge used a new law retroactively
[01:49:41.120 --> 01:49:47.120]  And now what I'm seeing is it says criminal law, but did you guys have something that references civil
[01:49:47.120 --> 01:49:52.120]  No, no, it's the whole, the idea of ex post facto
[01:49:52.120 --> 01:50:02.120]  What happened before the revolution is that, what was it Brett that was going on that the king didn't like
[01:50:02.120 --> 01:50:06.120]  The companies were getting too big and too powerful
[01:50:06.120 --> 01:50:13.120]  So the king passed laws to increase the taxes on these companies to break them up
[01:50:13.120 --> 01:50:25.120]  And he passed these laws and then enforced them against these companies where for things they did before the law was passed
[01:50:25.120 --> 01:50:28.120]  So he made it retroactively illegal
[01:50:28.120 --> 01:50:34.120]  So when our founders wrote our constitution, they forbade the government from doing that
[01:50:34.120 --> 01:50:42.120]  If something's legal when I do it, you can't make it illegal later and then hold me responsible for it
[01:50:42.120 --> 01:50:46.120]  That's what it goes to
[01:50:46.120 --> 01:50:50.120]  And that's exactly what's occurring in your case
[01:50:50.120 --> 01:51:00.120]  Okay, so when I bring that up, again, there's a pretty darn good choice, the chance that the court is going to say, oh my God, all right, and they kick it back down
[01:51:00.120 --> 01:51:03.120]  But let's just say for argument's sake they don't
[01:51:03.120 --> 01:51:11.120]  How do I draft this next section of pleadings in a way that, because my next only remedy is the Supreme Court
[01:51:11.120 --> 01:51:22.120]  And how do I draft an argument that the Supreme Court would even consider because, again, the Supreme Court deals with national consideration, not, you know, a county in Wyoming
[01:51:22.120 --> 01:51:30.120]  Okay, this is a big time deal that the Supreme will absolutely want to look at
[01:51:30.120 --> 01:51:41.120]  The United States Constitution prohibits Congress from enacting federal ex post facto laws through Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3
[01:51:41.120 --> 01:51:46.120]  Which states no bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed
[01:51:46.120 --> 01:51:55.120]  The scope, the prohibition applies only to criminal laws and not to civil laws that affect private rights adversely
[01:51:56.120 --> 01:52:05.120]  The Supreme Court has consistently held that federal ex post facto laws relate only to penal and criminal legislation, not civil laws
[01:52:05.120 --> 01:52:07.120]  That is problematic
[01:52:07.120 --> 01:52:13.120]  A federal ex post facto law must possess one or more of the following characteristics
[01:52:13.120 --> 01:52:19.120]  Punishes a crime as an act previously committed, which was innocent when done
[01:52:19.120 --> 01:52:32.120]  One makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime after its commission, deprives one charged with a crime of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed
[01:52:32.120 --> 01:52:38.120]  Okay, this is going to take a different argument
[01:52:38.120 --> 01:52:47.120]  Let's go to ex post facto laws in civil litigation
[01:52:49.120 --> 01:52:58.120]  I'm using the, an AI tool
[01:52:58.120 --> 01:53:07.120]  I'm looking on Webster's and it says a civil or criminal law with retroactive effects, so it is out there
[01:53:07.120 --> 01:53:16.120]  This is saying civil laws are exempt unlike criminal laws, federal laws and state laws were not subject to the ex post facto clause
[01:53:16.120 --> 01:53:25.120]  Changes to civil laws such as tort laws or contract laws can be enacted retroactively without violating the Constitution
[01:53:25.120 --> 01:53:35.120]  There is probably, this goes to fundamental unfairness
[01:53:35.120 --> 01:53:59.120]  You may look at case law at the time, I know there's case law out there saying that the courts have to consider a case based on the state of the law at the time of the case
[01:53:59.120 --> 01:54:07.120]  While this may not go specifically to ex post facto, it goes to fundamental fairness
[01:54:07.120 --> 01:54:09.120]  Yeah, at least that
[01:54:09.120 --> 01:54:14.120]  It's a similar concept though, I mean it doesn't sound like they're that far removed from one another
[01:54:14.120 --> 01:54:28.120]  The one thing about law, if something should be illegal, if a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would say this should be illegal, I can almost assure you it is
[01:54:28.120 --> 01:54:35.120]  This is not something new, this is something that not only you've dealt with but a lot of people have dealt with
[01:54:35.120 --> 01:54:42.120]  And by changing the law after the fact, that is fundamentally unfair
[01:54:42.120 --> 01:54:52.120]  So while you may not be able to go at it under ex post facto, you may well be able to go at it under fundamental fairness
[01:54:52.120 --> 01:55:01.120]  Okay, so I'll do that, I mean that's basically the whole crux of my whole brief is the fairness and equity
[01:55:01.120 --> 01:55:15.120]  But I totally overlooked this part of it, but what about a Supreme Court argument, would something like overreaching powers of the government be big enough for them to pick it up?
[01:55:15.120 --> 01:55:20.120]  Yeah, this is exactly the kind of thing they'll pick up, this is a new law
[01:55:20.120 --> 01:55:28.120]  And the courts need direction from the Supreme on how and when to apply the new law
[01:55:28.120 --> 01:55:39.120]  You could argue to the Supreme that this law should not be enforced retroactively, otherwise it denies a litigant in fundamental fairness
[01:55:39.120 --> 01:55:44.120]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back
[01:56:09.120 --> 01:56:17.120]  The translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes
[01:56:17.120 --> 01:56:27.120]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[01:56:27.120 --> 01:56:32.120]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[01:56:32.120 --> 01:56:42.120]  This comprehensive yet compact study bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:56:42.120 --> 01:56:47.120]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[01:56:47.120 --> 01:56:50.120]  That's freestudybible.com
[01:56:50.120 --> 01:56:59.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com
[01:56:59.120 --> 01:57:04.120]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[01:57:04.120 --> 01:57:10.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect, our liberty depends on it
[01:57:10.120 --> 01:57:15.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights
[01:57:15.120 --> 01:57:17.120]  Privacy is under attack
[01:57:17.120 --> 01:57:20.120]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:57:20.120 --> 01:57:25.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:57:25.120 --> 01:57:30.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:57:30.120 --> 01:57:33.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:57:33.120 --> 01:57:37.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[01:57:37.120 --> 01:57:41.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[01:57:41.120 --> 01:57:44.120]  Start over with Startpage
[01:57:44.120 --> 01:57:46.120]  Spar, it's what fighters do
[01:57:46.120 --> 01:57:50.120]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment
[01:57:50.120 --> 01:57:53.120]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you
[01:57:53.120 --> 01:57:55.120]  SPAR with an extra P
[01:57:55.120 --> 01:58:01.120]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly and R for religion
[01:58:01.120 --> 01:58:07.120]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly and religion
[01:58:07.120 --> 01:58:09.120]  But petition for redress is another matter
[01:58:09.120 --> 01:58:13.120]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances
[01:58:13.120 --> 01:58:16.120]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government
[01:58:16.120 --> 01:58:20.120]  We can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail
[01:58:20.120 --> 01:58:25.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:58:30.120 --> 01:58:33.120]  The Bill of Rights contains the First Ten Amendments of our Constitution
[01:58:33.120 --> 01:58:37.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[01:58:37.120 --> 01:58:39.120]  Our liberty depends on it
[01:58:39.120 --> 01:58:45.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[01:58:45.120 --> 01:58:47.120]  Privacy is under attack
[01:58:47.120 --> 01:58:51.120]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:58:51.120 --> 01:58:55.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:58:55.120 --> 01:59:01.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:59:01.120 --> 01:59:03.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:59:03.120 --> 01:59:07.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[01:59:07.120 --> 01:59:11.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[01:59:11.120 --> 01:59:14.120]  Start over with Startpage
[01:59:14.120 --> 01:59:21.120]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug
[01:59:21.120 --> 01:59:25.120]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms
[01:59:25.120 --> 01:59:29.120]  Arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight
[01:59:29.120 --> 01:59:33.120]  Get it? Two arms? Bear hug? Bear arms?
[01:59:33.120 --> 01:59:38.120]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said
[01:59:38.120 --> 01:59:43.120]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government
[01:59:43.120 --> 01:59:47.120]  One more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America
[01:59:47.120 --> 01:59:50.120]  But which historically has proved to always be possible
[01:59:50.120 --> 01:59:55.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[02:00:04.120 --> 02:00:10.120]  Yeah
[02:00:15.120 --> 02:00:19.120]  Well I received my remedy today
[02:00:19.120 --> 02:00:23.120]  Came in a box just like they say
[02:00:23.120 --> 02:00:26.120]  I accept it for value right away
[02:00:26.120 --> 02:00:30.120]  If not sooner, not later
[02:00:30.120 --> 02:00:34.120]  We are originators
[02:00:34.120 --> 02:00:38.120]  And the pathway seems to get straighter every day
[02:00:38.120 --> 02:00:42.120]  And I can take anything that belongs to me
[02:00:42.120 --> 02:00:46.120]  And put it to good use
[02:00:46.120 --> 02:00:49.120]  What I was good for the gander
[02:00:49.120 --> 02:00:53.120]  Is gonna work for the goose
[02:00:53.120 --> 02:00:57.120]  I know some architects
[02:00:57.120 --> 02:01:00.120]  I know some engineers
[02:01:00.120 --> 02:01:04.120]  They see the evidence
[02:01:04.120 --> 02:01:07.120]  They know something seems queer
[02:01:07.120 --> 02:01:10.120]  What's up with the blatant deception?
[02:01:10.120 --> 02:01:14.120]  What is the nature of what you might gain?
[02:01:14.120 --> 02:01:18.120]  I see something headed straight for you
[02:01:18.120 --> 02:01:22.120]  I think it looked just like a train
[02:01:22.120 --> 02:01:25.120]  It smells like a sham of sunders
[02:01:25.120 --> 02:01:29.120]  I can see them playing fast and loose
[02:01:29.120 --> 02:01:32.120]  What I was good for the gander
[02:01:32.120 --> 02:01:35.120]  Is gonna work for the goose
[02:01:35.120 --> 02:01:39.120]  What I was good for the gander
[02:01:39.120 --> 02:01:43.120]  Is gonna work for the goose
[02:01:43.120 --> 02:01:47.120]  I think it looked just like a train
[02:01:47.120 --> 02:01:51.120]  It smells like a sham of sunders
[02:01:51.120 --> 02:01:55.120]  I think it looked just like a train
[02:01:55.120 --> 02:01:59.120]  I think it looked just like a train
[02:01:59.120 --> 02:02:03.120]  I think it looked just like a train
[02:02:03.120 --> 02:02:07.120]  And we're talking to Chris in Colorado
[02:02:07.120 --> 02:02:11.120]  Okay, Chris
[02:02:11.120 --> 02:02:15.120]  Did I say 25?
[02:02:15.120 --> 02:02:19.120]  This is the 25th day of the month
[02:02:19.120 --> 02:02:23.120]  When you get old, time moves quickly
[02:02:23.120 --> 02:02:27.120]  Okay, 2024, I stand corrected
[02:02:27.120 --> 02:02:31.120]  Chris
[02:02:31.120 --> 02:02:35.120]  Okay, so I'll start thinking about that argument
[02:02:35.120 --> 02:02:38.120]  Just to draft the rest of it
[02:02:38.120 --> 02:02:41.120]  So I just want something to hold on to
[02:02:41.120 --> 02:02:44.120]  So if I do go to the Supreme Court
[02:02:44.120 --> 02:02:47.120]  I don't think I'm going there, but just in case
[02:02:47.120 --> 02:02:51.120]  And then you mentioned you had
[02:02:51.120 --> 02:02:54.120]  In the beginning you were talking
[02:02:54.120 --> 02:02:57.120]  That there's case law out there for the stress
[02:02:57.120 --> 02:03:00.120]  That waiting on for litigation
[02:03:00.120 --> 02:03:03.120]  When they're waiting for
[02:03:03.120 --> 02:03:06.120]  An arraignment or something like that
[02:03:06.120 --> 02:03:09.120]  Do you remember that?
[02:03:09.120 --> 02:03:12.120]  Waiting for an arraignment
[02:03:12.120 --> 02:03:15.120]  You were talking about how it's stressful and difficult
[02:03:15.120 --> 02:03:18.120]  To have this hanging over their head
[02:03:18.120 --> 02:03:22.120]  Yes, I've got that case law
[02:03:22.120 --> 02:03:26.120]  In a number of places
[02:03:26.120 --> 02:03:29.120]  My jurisprudence site
[02:03:29.120 --> 02:03:32.120]  I can get a link to it
[02:03:32.120 --> 02:03:35.120]  I don't have it working because I lost the
[02:03:35.120 --> 02:03:38.120]  The names
[02:03:38.120 --> 02:03:41.120]  The domain names
[02:03:41.120 --> 02:03:44.120]  Bluehost screwed those up for me
[02:03:44.120 --> 02:03:47.120]  But I do have them on the Pro Se from Hale site
[02:03:47.120 --> 02:03:50.120]  I can link you to my
[02:03:50.120 --> 02:03:53.120]  Due process
[02:03:53.120 --> 02:03:56.120]  With the habeas corpus that I wrote a long time ago
[02:03:56.120 --> 02:03:59.120]  It has all this case law in it and this argument
[02:03:59.120 --> 02:04:02.120]  That's a big argument actually
[02:04:02.120 --> 02:04:05.120]  I mean the fact that that's used against
[02:04:05.120 --> 02:04:08.120]  People kind of in a
[02:04:08.120 --> 02:04:11.120]  Unspoken manner
[02:04:11.120 --> 02:04:14.120]  Most people are terrified to be in court and for good reason
[02:04:14.120 --> 02:04:17.120]  Because it's stressful
[02:04:17.120 --> 02:04:20.120]  A lot of attorneys fall out of the practice after only
[02:04:20.120 --> 02:04:23.120]  Four or five years and they go work for Westlaw or something like that
[02:04:23.120 --> 02:04:26.120]  That's a huge argument actually
[02:04:26.120 --> 02:04:29.120]  I never even thought about it
[02:04:29.120 --> 02:04:32.120]  It was a big deal for our founders
[02:04:32.120 --> 02:04:35.120]  200 years ago they knew what a problem this was
[02:04:35.120 --> 02:04:38.120]  So it's nothing new
[02:04:38.120 --> 02:04:41.120]  And it's well in the case law
[02:04:41.120 --> 02:04:44.120]  I do have it if you'll send me an email asking me for it
[02:04:44.120 --> 02:04:47.120]  Then I'll go in and dig that out and send you that
[02:04:47.120 --> 02:04:50.120]  Habeas heck I wrote that
[02:04:50.120 --> 02:04:53.120]  A few years ago
[02:04:53.120 --> 02:04:56.120]  Can it be that long?
[02:04:56.120 --> 02:04:59.120]  Anyway I'll send that to you
[02:04:59.120 --> 02:05:02.120]  If you run that on
[02:05:02.120 --> 02:05:05.120]  Case text
[02:05:05.120 --> 02:05:08.120]  You pull the case up in case text
[02:05:08.120 --> 02:05:11.120]  And then off to the right there'll be a
[02:05:11.120 --> 02:05:14.120]  Label for citations you click that
[02:05:14.120 --> 02:05:17.120]  And it will bring you up the cases that have cited this case
[02:05:17.120 --> 02:05:20.120]  And get you some more current
[02:05:20.120 --> 02:05:23.120]  References to the same issues
[02:05:23.120 --> 02:05:26.120]  Okay
[02:05:26.120 --> 02:05:29.120]  And then last thing kind of off topic
[02:05:29.120 --> 02:05:32.120]  Did you guys know that today you guys are in the 5th district right?
[02:05:32.120 --> 02:05:35.120]  Yes 5th circuit yeah
[02:05:35.120 --> 02:05:38.120]  Did you guys know the 5th circuit ruled that any
[02:05:38.120 --> 02:05:41.120]  All mail in ballots have to be in by election day?
[02:05:41.120 --> 02:05:44.120]  No I hadn't heard that yet
[02:05:44.120 --> 02:05:47.120]  Just today
[02:05:47.120 --> 02:05:50.120]  Wonderful
[02:05:50.120 --> 02:05:53.120]  Yeah Michigan's doing the same thing
[02:05:53.120 --> 02:05:56.120]  What's that?
[02:05:56.120 --> 02:05:59.120]  Michigan's doing the same thing
[02:05:59.120 --> 02:06:02.120]  No late stuff
[02:06:02.120 --> 02:06:05.120]  Yeah Michigan really cracked down after everybody was pointing the finger
[02:06:05.120 --> 02:06:08.120]  Michigan last time
[02:06:08.120 --> 02:06:11.120]  Michigan has gotten very tight
[02:06:11.120 --> 02:06:14.120]  They're not going to let dead people vote anymore
[02:06:14.120 --> 02:06:17.120]  You mean I'm not going to be able
[02:06:17.120 --> 02:06:20.120]  To vote from the grave?
[02:06:20.120 --> 02:06:23.120]  Well there's no guarantees
[02:06:23.120 --> 02:06:26.120]  But we know who you'll vote for if you do
[02:06:26.120 --> 02:06:29.120]  No more life after death
[02:06:29.120 --> 02:06:32.120]  But isn't it when they do federal
[02:06:32.120 --> 02:06:35.120]  Like that on the circuit it's all circuits after that?
[02:06:35.120 --> 02:06:38.120]  No
[02:06:38.120 --> 02:06:41.120]  No
[02:06:41.120 --> 02:06:44.120]  It's only the one circuit
[02:06:44.120 --> 02:06:47.120]  It is advisory but not controlling
[02:06:47.120 --> 02:06:50.120]  Like
[02:06:50.120 --> 02:06:53.120]  The
[02:06:53.120 --> 02:06:56.120]  Ternary driver
[02:06:56.120 --> 02:06:59.120]  Ternary driver was one on your right to record
[02:06:59.120 --> 02:07:02.120]  Public officials
[02:07:02.120 --> 02:07:05.120]  All but two circuits had ruled
[02:07:05.120 --> 02:07:08.120]  That citizens can
[02:07:08.120 --> 02:07:11.120]  Can videotape their public officials
[02:07:11.120 --> 02:07:14.120]  And there's the
[02:07:14.120 --> 02:07:17.120]  Fifth circuit ruled against
[02:07:17.120 --> 02:07:20.120]  Turner
[02:07:20.120 --> 02:07:23.120]  Saying that
[02:07:23.120 --> 02:07:26.120]  This is not settled law in the fifth circuit
[02:07:26.120 --> 02:07:29.120]  So Turner loses his claim
[02:07:29.120 --> 02:07:32.120]  But then they went on to say
[02:07:32.120 --> 02:07:35.120]  In the future it is settled law
[02:07:35.120 --> 02:07:38.120]  They settled it in this case and said it is
[02:07:38.120 --> 02:07:41.120]  Axiomatic that a private citizen can
[02:07:41.120 --> 02:07:44.120]  Videotape his public officials in the performance of their duty
[02:07:44.120 --> 02:07:47.120]  So now it became law in the fifth circuit
[02:07:47.120 --> 02:07:50.120]  So each circuit has to rule on it
[02:07:50.120 --> 02:07:53.120]  I see so it's not precedent yet
[02:07:53.120 --> 02:07:56.120]  Necessarily in the other circuits but it is taking an advisory
[02:07:56.120 --> 02:07:59.120]  And if anybody challenges it they're going to use
[02:07:59.120 --> 02:08:02.120]  The fifth circuit as precedent
[02:08:02.120 --> 02:08:05.120]  Wait to make sure it happens in the other circuits
[02:08:05.120 --> 02:08:08.120]  Exactly
[02:08:08.120 --> 02:08:11.120]  So essentially though it almost is
[02:08:11.120 --> 02:08:14.120]  It just needs a domino through the rest of the nation
[02:08:14.120 --> 02:08:17.120]  Isn't that kind of the mask mandate
[02:08:17.120 --> 02:08:20.120]  This is the kind of argument
[02:08:20.120 --> 02:08:23.120]  That they will want to deal out
[02:08:23.120 --> 02:08:26.120]  Because they don't want it to get to the fifth circuit
[02:08:26.120 --> 02:08:29.120]  To the supreme
[02:08:29.120 --> 02:08:32.120]  Because they risk getting a bad ruling
[02:08:32.120 --> 02:08:35.120]  So if you bring up these issues they don't want to have to hear
[02:08:35.120 --> 02:08:38.120]  Then they're likely to offer you a deal to get it to go away
[02:08:38.120 --> 02:08:41.120]  Before it gets that far
[02:08:41.120 --> 02:08:44.120]  Well I'm just talking about the voting
[02:08:44.120 --> 02:08:47.120]  That's huge
[02:08:47.120 --> 02:08:50.120]  That means basically because your circuit ruled today
[02:08:50.120 --> 02:08:53.120]  That there's no late voting
[02:08:53.120 --> 02:08:56.120]  After election day
[02:08:56.120 --> 02:08:59.120]  Then that means our elections are happening November 5th this year
[02:08:59.120 --> 02:09:02.120]  Good
[02:09:02.120 --> 02:09:05.120]  No more months in order to screw up the vote
[02:09:05.120 --> 02:09:08.120]  Yeah
[02:09:08.120 --> 02:09:11.120]  Because they had time to figure out how many votes they needed
[02:09:11.120 --> 02:09:14.120]  And then they had time to go out and create those votes
[02:09:14.120 --> 02:09:17.120]  Oh we're still counting
[02:09:17.120 --> 02:09:20.120]  We're still counting
[02:09:20.120 --> 02:09:23.120]  Absolutely insane
[02:09:23.120 --> 02:09:26.120]  Well I was trying to get before the Republican party
[02:09:26.120 --> 02:09:29.120]  I have a friend in Austin
[02:09:29.120 --> 02:09:32.120]  Who's Mayor Krennic is getting pretty high up
[02:09:32.120 --> 02:09:35.120]  In the Republican party getting well known
[02:09:35.120 --> 02:09:38.120]  And I wanted to speak to them
[02:09:38.120 --> 02:09:41.120]  About poll watching
[02:09:41.120 --> 02:09:44.120]  The way to do poll watching
[02:09:44.120 --> 02:09:47.120]  Is if you observe something
[02:09:47.120 --> 02:09:50.120]  That you don't believe is improper
[02:09:50.120 --> 02:09:53.120]  Don't go down there and start a fight with the election judge
[02:09:53.120 --> 02:09:56.120]  Call 911
[02:09:56.120 --> 02:09:59.120]  Get a policeman down there and tell the policeman
[02:09:59.120 --> 02:10:02.120]  What you have observed
[02:10:02.120 --> 02:10:05.120]  And get the policeman to go talk to the election judge
[02:10:05.120 --> 02:10:08.120]  Now you're not likely to get the election judge
[02:10:08.120 --> 02:10:11.120]  Arrested or any of the poll workers arrested
[02:10:11.120 --> 02:10:14.120]  And that's not the purpose
[02:10:14.120 --> 02:10:17.120]  But you are going to get their attention
[02:10:17.120 --> 02:10:20.120]  If you're a poll worker and you've been
[02:10:20.120 --> 02:10:23.120]  Instructed to do something that you don't think is proper
[02:10:23.120 --> 02:10:26.120]  And then you look up and there's a policeman
[02:10:26.120 --> 02:10:29.120]  Talking to the election judge
[02:10:29.120 --> 02:10:32.120]  About what they're telling you to do
[02:10:32.120 --> 02:10:35.120]  That's going to get your attention
[02:10:35.120 --> 02:10:38.120]  This is how we can take care of it
[02:10:38.120 --> 02:10:41.120]  We don't call 911 because we want anybody arrested
[02:10:41.120 --> 02:10:44.120]  We call 911 because we need a mediator
[02:10:44.120 --> 02:10:47.120]  Someone to stand between the two of you
[02:10:47.120 --> 02:10:50.120]  So that bad things don't happen
[02:10:50.120 --> 02:10:53.120]  And when the election judge
[02:10:53.120 --> 02:10:56.120]  Is talking to a guy with a pistol on his hip
[02:10:56.120 --> 02:10:59.120]  He's got to wonder
[02:10:59.120 --> 02:11:02.120]  Is this cop a Republican?
[02:11:02.120 --> 02:11:05.120]  Anyway, that's my story
[02:11:05.120 --> 02:11:08.120]  Cool
[02:11:08.120 --> 02:11:11.120]  Okay, you guys have been super helpful
[02:11:11.120 --> 02:11:14.120]  And a lot, a lot
[02:11:14.120 --> 02:11:17.120]  Went through a lot tonight, thank you very much
[02:11:17.120 --> 02:11:20.120]  I hope you're able to subpoena one of those legislators
[02:11:20.120 --> 02:11:23.120]  Or get a deposition out of them
[02:11:23.120 --> 02:11:26.120]  That would be really cool
[02:11:26.120 --> 02:11:29.120]  Yeah, I'm going to just start calling them probably next week
[02:11:29.120 --> 02:11:32.120]  And then see who wants to play ball
[02:11:32.120 --> 02:11:35.120]  And then I know you're right, probably at least one or two would want to do that
[02:11:35.120 --> 02:11:38.120]  I don't know how far this is going to go
[02:11:38.120 --> 02:11:41.120]  I think at some point they're all just going to cave
[02:11:41.120 --> 02:11:44.120]  This is small town stuff
[02:11:44.120 --> 02:11:47.120]  This isn't like big
[02:11:47.120 --> 02:11:50.120]  If you take small town stuff
[02:11:50.120 --> 02:11:53.120]  And turn it into a potential
[02:11:53.120 --> 02:11:56.120]  Supreme Court ruling
[02:11:56.120 --> 02:11:59.120]  They're going to want this to go away
[02:11:59.120 --> 02:12:02.120]  Yeah
[02:12:02.120 --> 02:12:05.120]  Well, the main goal here though is
[02:12:05.120 --> 02:12:08.120]  This is a hospital who is harming people
[02:12:08.120 --> 02:12:11.120]  Like one of the lawyers I talked to
[02:12:11.120 --> 02:12:14.120]  Actually many of the lawyers, but many people
[02:12:14.120 --> 02:12:17.120]  The ones who have money, they take their family
[02:12:17.120 --> 02:12:20.120]  An hour south to Fort Collins, Colorado
[02:12:20.120 --> 02:12:23.120]  To that hospital
[02:12:23.120 --> 02:12:26.120]  That's the reputation of this hospital
[02:12:26.120 --> 02:12:29.120]  One of the senators talked about his own daughter
[02:12:29.120 --> 02:12:32.120]  And he finally got sick of it
[02:12:32.120 --> 02:12:35.120]  They were killing her and he took her down to Colorado
[02:12:35.120 --> 02:12:38.120]  And within like four days she was fine
[02:12:38.120 --> 02:12:41.120]  So there's these stories upon stories
[02:12:41.120 --> 02:12:44.120]  These people are incompetent
[02:12:44.120 --> 02:12:47.120]  You definitely need to talk to this senator
[02:12:47.120 --> 02:12:50.120]  That's the one thing
[02:12:50.120 --> 02:12:53.120]  We need some change
[02:12:53.120 --> 02:12:56.120]  I forget that terminology
[02:12:56.120 --> 02:12:59.120]  They need to be ordered to up their game
[02:12:59.120 --> 02:13:02.120]  You may have a politician
[02:13:02.120 --> 02:13:05.120]  Who's looking for an excuse
[02:13:05.120 --> 02:13:08.120]  Or plausible deniability
[02:13:08.120 --> 02:13:11.120]  To step into this
[02:13:11.120 --> 02:13:14.120]  When I filed that 250 page criminal complaint against the governor
[02:13:14.120 --> 02:13:17.120]  It was exactly what he needed
[02:13:17.120 --> 02:13:20.120]  He had all these executive orders
[02:13:20.120 --> 02:13:23.120]  That were killing him
[02:13:23.120 --> 02:13:26.120]  Six Pack was not a happy camper
[02:13:26.120 --> 02:13:29.120]  And he's looking at losing the next election
[02:13:29.120 --> 02:13:32.120]  Because the ordinary public is so PO'd at it
[02:13:32.120 --> 02:13:35.120]  So I filed this criminal complaint against him
[02:13:35.120 --> 02:13:38.120]  And he got to use that as plausible deniability
[02:13:38.120 --> 02:13:41.120]  To get rid of all of these
[02:13:41.120 --> 02:13:44.120]  And that's why he dumped them
[02:13:44.120 --> 02:13:47.120]  He didn't dump them because he's afraid of me
[02:13:47.120 --> 02:13:50.120]  I gave him a plausible deniability
[02:13:50.120 --> 02:13:53.120]  He might just come in and pick on this hospital
[02:13:53.120 --> 02:13:56.120]  But if you open the door for him
[02:13:56.120 --> 02:13:59.120]  He may be happy to do it
[02:14:20.120 --> 02:14:23.120]  How to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[02:14:23.120 --> 02:14:26.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[02:14:26.120 --> 02:14:29.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[02:14:29.120 --> 02:14:32.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them
[02:14:32.120 --> 02:14:35.120]  And make them pay you to go away
[02:14:35.120 --> 02:14:38.120]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution
[02:14:38.120 --> 02:14:41.120]  For how to stop debt collectors
[02:14:41.120 --> 02:14:44.120]  Personal consultation is available as well
[02:14:44.120 --> 02:14:47.120]  For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[02:14:48.120 --> 02:14:51.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[02:14:51.120 --> 02:14:54.120]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[02:14:54.120 --> 02:14:57.120]  At yahoo.com
[02:14:57.120 --> 02:15:00.120]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[02:15:00.120 --> 02:15:03.120]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer
[02:15:03.120 --> 02:15:06.120]  The Rule of Law traffic seminar
[02:15:06.120 --> 02:15:09.120]  In today's America we live in an us against them society
[02:15:09.120 --> 02:15:12.120]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[02:15:12.120 --> 02:15:15.120]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[02:15:15.120 --> 02:15:18.120]  The right to private capacity and most importantly
[02:15:18.120 --> 02:15:21.120]  The right to due process of law
[02:15:21.120 --> 02:15:24.120]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[02:15:24.120 --> 02:15:27.120]  To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[02:15:27.120 --> 02:15:30.120]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[02:15:30.120 --> 02:15:33.120]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[02:15:33.120 --> 02:15:36.120]  That will help you understand what due process is
[02:15:36.120 --> 02:15:39.120]  And how to hold the courts to the rule of law
[02:15:39.120 --> 02:15:42.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[02:15:42.120 --> 02:15:45.120]  The interpretation code, the law versus the lie
[02:15:45.120 --> 02:15:48.120]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[02:15:48.120 --> 02:15:51.120]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[02:15:51.120 --> 02:15:54.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[02:15:54.120 --> 02:15:57.120]  Order your copy today and together we can have
[02:15:57.120 --> 02:16:00.120]  The free society we all want and deserve
[02:16:00.120 --> 02:16:03.120]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[02:16:03.120 --> 02:16:06.120]  Logosradio.com
[02:16:06.120 --> 02:16:09.120]  Logosradio.com
[02:16:10.120 --> 02:16:13.120]  Well don't let nothing get to you
[02:16:13.120 --> 02:16:16.120]  Only the father can't deliver you
[02:16:16.120 --> 02:16:19.120]  So don't let bad mind people hurt you
[02:16:19.120 --> 02:16:22.120]  And tell Satan get behind you
[02:16:22.120 --> 02:16:25.120]  Know what I mean, my friend
[02:16:25.120 --> 02:16:28.120]  Knowledge our children, come on
[02:16:28.120 --> 02:16:31.120]  Those things had me free
[02:16:31.120 --> 02:16:34.120]  Telling you problem then
[02:16:34.120 --> 02:16:37.120]  Calling his name once again
[02:16:37.120 --> 02:16:40.120]  Here we go, you know he worth it
[02:16:40.120 --> 02:16:43.120]  Trust in God, my friend
[02:16:43.120 --> 02:16:46.120]  Telling you problem then
[02:16:46.120 --> 02:16:49.120]  Calling his name once again
[02:16:49.120 --> 02:16:52.120]  Here we go, you know he worth it
[02:16:52.120 --> 02:16:55.120]  He is my king, man, he is everything
[02:16:55.120 --> 02:16:58.120]  He is everything to me, that's why I call him
[02:16:58.120 --> 02:17:01.120]  I put up my knee and I pray to him
[02:17:01.120 --> 02:17:04.120]  We are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio
[02:17:04.120 --> 02:17:07.120]  Finishing up with Chris in Colorado
[02:17:07.120 --> 02:17:10.120]  Chris, do you have anything else for us?
[02:17:10.120 --> 02:17:13.120]  That's it, and a shout out to Tina
[02:17:13.120 --> 02:17:16.120]  I heard her talk last night, well done
[02:17:16.120 --> 02:17:19.120]  Tina is a hoot
[02:17:19.120 --> 02:17:22.120]  Ok, thank you Chris
[02:17:22.120 --> 02:17:25.120]  Now we are going to Stephen in Texas
[02:17:25.120 --> 02:17:28.120]  Hello Stephen, we lost you the other night
[02:17:28.120 --> 02:17:31.120]  Just when we came to you, you dropped off
[02:17:31.120 --> 02:17:34.120]  Yes sir
[02:17:34.120 --> 02:17:37.120]  I
[02:17:37.120 --> 02:17:40.120]  Got an issue
[02:17:40.120 --> 02:17:43.120]  Told you I had to end up
[02:17:43.120 --> 02:17:46.120]  My house burned down, we ended up having to
[02:17:46.120 --> 02:17:49.120]  Settle on a mobile home I've got out here now
[02:17:49.120 --> 02:17:52.120]  Just trying to get the utilities hooked up
[02:17:52.120 --> 02:17:55.120]  They missed, let's just say they carried money in there
[02:17:55.120 --> 02:17:58.120]  We already found that they carried money in there for the utilities
[02:17:58.120 --> 02:18:01.120]  They told us that they
[02:18:01.120 --> 02:18:04.120]  Wait a minute, you are starting in the middle of something
[02:18:04.120 --> 02:18:07.120]  Give us a little background
[02:18:10.120 --> 02:18:13.120]  I ended up having to get a new home
[02:18:13.120 --> 02:18:16.120]  After many many years
[02:18:16.120 --> 02:18:19.120]  Ended up having to go to a mobile home dealer
[02:18:19.120 --> 02:18:22.120]  We've got a mobile home out here now
[02:18:22.120 --> 02:18:25.120]  And in the paperwork when we went to go
[02:18:25.120 --> 02:18:28.120]  We had to settle on this thing
[02:18:28.120 --> 02:18:31.120]  I'm the utility contractor
[02:18:31.120 --> 02:18:34.120]  We'll take care of the utilities
[02:18:34.120 --> 02:18:37.120]  I don't need to pay you extra for that
[02:18:37.120 --> 02:18:40.120]  It was in the original paperwork
[02:18:40.120 --> 02:18:43.120]  Of what we had signed
[02:18:43.120 --> 02:18:46.120]  Clearly marked that we'd handle that for ourselves
[02:18:46.120 --> 02:18:49.120]  And there was a set price in that amount that we signed on
[02:18:49.120 --> 02:18:52.120]  Which we hadn't been writing at that dealership
[02:18:52.120 --> 02:18:55.120]  We had some time for this to come out
[02:18:55.120 --> 02:18:58.120]  And their general manager
[02:18:58.120 --> 02:19:01.120]  Comes up and says, wait, you guys are doing that yourself
[02:19:01.120 --> 02:19:04.120]  It says here we carried $4,500
[02:19:04.120 --> 02:19:07.120]  In your loan amount for doing that
[02:19:07.120 --> 02:19:10.120]  Okay, then you need to return that to us
[02:19:10.120 --> 02:19:13.120]  Or we need to get this squared away
[02:19:13.120 --> 02:19:16.120]  They've messed around for well over two months now
[02:19:16.120 --> 02:19:19.120]  With this and
[02:19:19.120 --> 02:19:22.120]  When I first started listening to
[02:19:22.120 --> 02:19:25.120]  You back in the day
[02:19:25.120 --> 02:19:28.120]  We'd come out of the banking crisis 2008
[02:19:28.120 --> 02:19:31.120]  And you were doing the HUD 1 statement
[02:19:31.120 --> 02:19:34.120]  Issues where you went up and make them prove up
[02:19:34.120 --> 02:19:37.120]  All the other problems that they had wrong on this
[02:19:37.120 --> 02:19:40.120]  I'm really not happy with these people at the moment
[02:19:40.120 --> 02:19:43.120]  And that's kind of what I wanted to go to
[02:19:43.120 --> 02:19:46.120]  At the beginning of this conversation
[02:19:46.120 --> 02:19:49.120]  I'd like to make these people prove up
[02:19:49.120 --> 02:19:52.120]  How bad they messed my loan up, what they did
[02:19:52.120 --> 02:19:55.120]  And how much they were going to try getting out of the extra interest
[02:19:55.120 --> 02:19:58.120]  Okay, send me an email
[02:19:58.120 --> 02:20:01.120]  And ask me for my
[02:20:01.120 --> 02:20:04.120]  Spreadsheet that I have on this issue
[02:20:04.120 --> 02:20:07.120]  It's not a great spreadsheet, I built it myself
[02:20:07.120 --> 02:20:10.120]  It took me six months to build this thing
[02:20:10.120 --> 02:20:13.120]  But it's not as sophisticated as some
[02:20:13.120 --> 02:20:16.120]  But what I do
[02:20:16.120 --> 02:20:19.120]  Is I take the loan amount
[02:20:19.120 --> 02:20:22.120]  From the
[02:20:22.120 --> 02:20:25.120]  Loan document
[02:20:25.120 --> 02:20:28.120]  And I take the interest from the loan document
[02:20:28.120 --> 02:20:31.120]  Do you have a fixed interest or a variable interest?
[02:20:31.120 --> 02:20:34.120]  It's fixed
[02:20:34.120 --> 02:20:37.120]  Fixed, okay
[02:20:37.120 --> 02:20:40.120]  And I do an amortization on it
[02:20:40.120 --> 02:20:43.120]  I assume that you pay
[02:20:43.120 --> 02:20:46.120]  Every payment on time
[02:20:46.120 --> 02:20:49.120]  And calculate from the date
[02:20:49.120 --> 02:20:52.120]  That you originated the mortgage to the current date
[02:20:52.120 --> 02:20:55.120]  And I calculate exactly
[02:20:55.120 --> 02:20:58.120]  What you should be owing to the penny
[02:20:58.120 --> 02:21:01.120]  And then I compare that to what they're showing
[02:21:01.120 --> 02:21:04.120]  That you're owing
[02:21:04.120 --> 02:21:07.120]  It's never the same
[02:21:07.120 --> 02:21:10.120]  Then
[02:21:10.120 --> 02:21:13.120]  I take the truth
[02:21:13.120 --> 02:21:16.120]  And lending statement
[02:21:16.120 --> 02:21:19.120]  And take the numbers from the truth and lending statement
[02:21:19.120 --> 02:21:22.120]  They're always different than the note
[02:21:22.120 --> 02:21:25.120]  It'll have a different principle
[02:21:25.120 --> 02:21:28.120]  Generally a lower principle and higher interest
[02:21:28.120 --> 02:21:31.120]  In about 1% of the cases
[02:21:31.120 --> 02:21:34.120]  The numbers calculate out the same
[02:21:34.120 --> 02:21:37.120]  But in the vast majority of the cases
[02:21:37.120 --> 02:21:40.120]  They don't
[02:21:40.120 --> 02:21:43.120]  Now I have asked for a long time
[02:21:43.120 --> 02:21:46.120]  Tried to figure out how they came up with these numbers
[02:21:46.120 --> 02:21:49.120]  And no one could ever tell me
[02:21:49.120 --> 02:21:52.120]  The closest I came
[02:21:52.120 --> 02:21:55.120]  Was Pastor Mass's brother
[02:21:55.120 --> 02:21:58.120]  Was a real estate broker
[02:21:58.120 --> 02:22:01.120]  And he said they take your mortgage
[02:22:01.120 --> 02:22:04.120]  The insurance off the mortgage
[02:22:04.120 --> 02:22:07.120]  And
[02:22:07.120 --> 02:22:10.120]  Then they jockey it around
[02:22:10.120 --> 02:22:13.120]  I forget exactly how they did it
[02:22:13.120 --> 02:22:16.120]  But it had to do with the homeowners insurance
[02:22:16.120 --> 02:22:19.120]  And come up with this truth and lending statement
[02:22:19.120 --> 02:22:22.120]  Anyway, they never match
[02:22:22.120 --> 02:22:25.120]  So I do a truth and lending statement
[02:22:25.120 --> 02:22:28.120]  And I do an actual amortization
[02:22:28.120 --> 02:22:31.120]  The truth and lending statement will have you paying more
[02:22:31.120 --> 02:22:34.120]  Than the actual amortization
[02:22:34.120 --> 02:22:37.120]  So I calculate a difference in that
[02:22:37.120 --> 02:22:40.120]  And then I take the HUD-1 settlement statement
[02:22:40.120 --> 02:22:43.120]  When you set down
[02:22:43.120 --> 02:22:46.120]  At the closing table
[02:22:46.120 --> 02:22:49.120]  And they gave you this HUD-1 settlement statement
[02:22:49.120 --> 02:22:52.120]  For those you don't know, a HUD-1 settlement statement
[02:22:52.120 --> 02:22:55.120]  Is the document with all the numbers
[02:22:55.120 --> 02:22:58.120]  The mortgage, original price
[02:22:58.120 --> 02:23:01.120]  The down payment, the interest
[02:23:01.120 --> 02:23:04.120]  The costs of all of the
[02:23:04.120 --> 02:23:07.120]  The
[02:23:07.120 --> 02:23:10.120]  The services that are required
[02:23:10.120 --> 02:23:13.120]  To create the mortgage
[02:23:13.120 --> 02:23:16.120]  Well, according to the real estate settlement procedures act
[02:23:16.120 --> 02:23:19.120]  There are only certain things
[02:23:19.120 --> 02:23:22.120]  That you can be charged
[02:23:22.120 --> 02:23:25.120]  And when you set down at the closing table
[02:23:25.120 --> 02:23:28.120]  They gave you the HUD-1 settlement statement
[02:23:28.120 --> 02:23:31.120]  Did they provide you
[02:23:31.120 --> 02:23:34.120]  With any documentation to show
[02:23:34.120 --> 02:23:37.120]  That the amounts charged
[02:23:37.120 --> 02:23:40.120]  Were reasonable
[02:23:40.120 --> 02:23:43.120]  That they were for services actually rendered
[02:23:43.120 --> 02:23:46.120]  That the services were necessary
[02:23:46.120 --> 02:23:49.120]  That the amounts charged for the services
[02:23:49.120 --> 02:23:52.120]  Were reasonable
[02:23:52.120 --> 02:23:55.120]  And that the lender did not take an undisclosed markup
[02:23:55.120 --> 02:23:58.120]  On the amounts charged
[02:23:58.120 --> 02:24:01.120]  Did you get any of that documentation?
[02:24:01.120 --> 02:24:04.120]  Nobody ever gets any of that
[02:24:04.120 --> 02:24:07.120]  So the presumption is
[02:24:07.120 --> 02:24:10.120]  Since they did not document any of these numbers
[02:24:10.120 --> 02:24:13.120]  They just pulled these numbers out of their behind
[02:24:13.120 --> 02:24:16.120]  And stuck them on the paper
[02:24:16.120 --> 02:24:19.120]  And it is your consideration that all of these
[02:24:19.120 --> 02:24:22.120]  Amounts are fraudulent
[02:24:22.120 --> 02:24:25.120]  Every one of them
[02:24:25.120 --> 02:24:28.120]  So, you take the amortization you've already done on the note
[02:24:28.120 --> 02:24:31.120]  And then you subtract
[02:24:31.120 --> 02:24:34.120]  The amount on the HUD-1 settlement
[02:24:34.120 --> 02:24:37.120]  Statement in line 1400
[02:24:37.120 --> 02:24:40.120]  You subtract that from the original principle
[02:24:40.120 --> 02:24:43.120]  As an overpayment on the first payment
[02:24:43.120 --> 02:24:46.120]  Because you maintain that this is all
[02:24:46.120 --> 02:24:49.120]  Extra money they charged you
[02:24:49.120 --> 02:24:52.120]  Then amortize the note
[02:24:52.120 --> 02:24:55.120]  You will generally get
[02:24:55.120 --> 02:24:58.120]  An amortization that shows that you're paying
[02:24:58.120 --> 02:25:01.120]  Between 70 and 90 percent
[02:25:01.120 --> 02:25:04.120]  And overcharges
[02:25:04.120 --> 02:25:07.120]  Then you
[02:25:07.120 --> 02:25:10.120]  Sue for that
[02:25:10.120 --> 02:25:13.120]  Punitive because you're trying to steal it from you
[02:25:13.120 --> 02:25:16.120]  I can generally get a claim
[02:25:16.120 --> 02:25:19.120]  Against the lender in excess
[02:25:19.120 --> 02:25:22.120]  Of the original amount of the mortgage
[02:25:22.120 --> 02:25:25.120]  Now you sue them
[02:25:25.120 --> 02:25:28.120]  And then we start to fight
[02:25:28.120 --> 02:25:31.120]  The first thing we do is say who are you
[02:25:31.120 --> 02:25:34.120]  I don't know who you are, I had a client
[02:25:34.120 --> 02:25:37.120]  In California
[02:25:37.120 --> 02:25:40.120]  Wells Fargo was the lender, Wells Fargo was the servicer
[02:25:40.120 --> 02:25:43.120]  Wells Fargo was doing the foreclosure
[02:25:43.120 --> 02:25:46.120]  And we filed the first suit
[02:25:46.120 --> 02:25:49.120]  That said who are you
[02:25:49.120 --> 02:25:52.120]  We don't know who you are
[02:25:52.120 --> 02:25:55.120]  We've made no business with you, never dealt with you
[02:25:55.120 --> 02:25:58.120]  Never dealt with your alleged principle, prove it up
[02:25:58.120 --> 02:26:01.120]  Now in law
[02:26:01.120 --> 02:26:04.120]  You don't have to admit to anything
[02:26:04.120 --> 02:26:07.120]  They're claiming they have a claim against you
[02:26:07.120 --> 02:26:10.120]  They're claiming they have a claim in a certain amount
[02:26:10.120 --> 02:26:13.120]  Prove it
[02:26:13.120 --> 02:26:16.120]  How can you say
[02:26:16.120 --> 02:26:19.120]  How can you say that I haven't done any business with you
[02:26:19.120 --> 02:26:22.120]  Seems like you'd have to just
[02:26:22.120 --> 02:26:25.120]  Say
[02:26:25.120 --> 02:26:28.120]  Show me how I ever have
[02:26:28.120 --> 02:26:31.120]  Kind of a prove it thing without saying what's false
[02:26:31.120 --> 02:26:34.120]  You have to deny their claims
[02:26:34.120 --> 02:26:37.120]  So it is the nature
[02:26:37.120 --> 02:26:40.120]  Of civil law that
[02:26:40.120 --> 02:26:43.120]  I don't believe I have any business with you
[02:26:43.120 --> 02:26:46.120]  You are the one that is making the claim
[02:26:46.120 --> 02:26:49.120]  You have to prove it up
[02:26:49.120 --> 02:26:52.120]  I don't have to admit to anything
[02:26:52.120 --> 02:26:55.120]  So I'm not admitting to anything
[02:26:55.120 --> 02:26:58.120]  Hang on Randy, we'll be right back
[02:26:59.120 --> 02:27:02.120]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise
[02:27:02.120 --> 02:27:05.120]  But you might not know that the way you walk
[02:27:05.120 --> 02:27:08.120]  Could predict how long you're going to live
[02:27:08.120 --> 02:27:11.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you more
[02:27:11.120 --> 02:27:14.120]  About walking prognostication in just a moment
[02:27:14.120 --> 02:27:17.120]  Privacy is under attack
[02:27:17.120 --> 02:27:20.120]  When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[02:27:20.120 --> 02:27:23.120]  And once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms
[02:27:23.120 --> 02:27:26.120]  Will start to vanish too
[02:27:26.120 --> 02:27:29.120]  Start surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[02:27:29.120 --> 02:27:32.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[02:27:32.120 --> 02:27:35.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[02:27:35.120 --> 02:27:38.120]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[02:27:38.120 --> 02:27:41.120]  Start over with Startpage
[02:27:41.120 --> 02:27:44.120]  New research shows how fast you walk
[02:27:44.120 --> 02:27:47.120]  Could predict how long you're going to live
[02:27:47.120 --> 02:27:50.120]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that
[02:27:50.120 --> 02:27:53.120]  Older adults who walk one meter per second or faster
[02:27:53.120 --> 02:27:56.120]  Live longer than expected
[02:27:56.120 --> 02:27:59.120]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about
[02:27:59.120 --> 02:28:02.120]  Two and a quarter miles per hour
[02:28:02.120 --> 02:28:05.120]  A senior's age, gender and walking speed were as good at predicting
[02:28:05.120 --> 02:28:08.120]  Life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures
[02:28:08.120 --> 02:28:11.120]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer
[02:28:11.120 --> 02:28:14.120]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive
[02:28:14.120 --> 02:28:17.120]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk in a few minutes
[02:28:17.120 --> 02:28:20.120]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients
[02:28:20.120 --> 02:28:23.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at
[02:28:23.120 --> 02:28:26.120]  CatherineAlbrecht.com
[02:28:50.120 --> 02:28:53.120]  If there is more to the story, bring justice to my son
[02:28:53.120 --> 02:28:56.120]  My uncle, my nephew, my son, go to
[02:28:56.120 --> 02:28:59.120]  BuildingWatt.org, why it fell, why it matters
[02:28:59.120 --> 02:29:02.120]  And what you can do
[02:29:02.120 --> 02:29:05.120]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[02:29:05.120 --> 02:29:08.120]  And a better understanding of His Word?
[02:29:08.120 --> 02:29:11.120]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays
[02:29:11.120 --> 02:29:14.120]  From 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk
[02:29:14.120 --> 02:29:17.120]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord
[02:29:17.120 --> 02:29:20.120]  Study to show thyself approved unto God
[02:29:20.120 --> 02:29:23.120]  A workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth
[02:29:23.120 --> 02:29:26.120]  Starting in January, our first hour studies
[02:29:26.120 --> 02:29:29.120]  Are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse
[02:29:29.120 --> 02:29:32.120]  And discuss the true Gospel message
[02:29:32.120 --> 02:29:35.120]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week
[02:29:35.120 --> 02:29:38.120]  With discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[02:29:38.120 --> 02:29:41.120]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing
[02:29:41.120 --> 02:29:44.120]  To all those with a hearing ear
[02:29:45.120 --> 02:29:48.120]  And to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[02:29:48.120 --> 02:29:51.120]  Of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[02:29:51.120 --> 02:29:54.120]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[02:29:54.120 --> 02:29:57.120]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[02:29:57.120 --> 02:30:00.120]  To inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures
[02:30:00.120 --> 02:30:03.120]  Live free speech radio
[02:30:03.120 --> 02:30:06.120]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[02:30:14.120 --> 02:30:17.120]  Music
[02:30:17.120 --> 02:30:20.120]  Music
[02:30:20.120 --> 02:30:23.120]  Music
[02:30:23.120 --> 02:30:26.120]  Music
[02:30:26.120 --> 02:30:29.120]  Music
[02:30:29.120 --> 02:30:32.120]  Music
[02:30:32.120 --> 02:30:35.120]  Music
[02:30:35.120 --> 02:30:38.120]  Music
[02:30:38.120 --> 02:30:41.120]  Music
[02:30:41.120 --> 02:30:44.120]  Music
[02:30:44.120 --> 02:30:47.120]  Music
[02:30:47.120 --> 02:30:50.120]  Music
[02:30:50.120 --> 02:30:53.120]  Music
[02:30:53.120 --> 02:30:56.120]  Music
[02:30:59.120 --> 02:31:02.120]  Music
[02:31:02.120 --> 02:31:05.120]  Music
[02:31:05.120 --> 02:31:08.120]  Music
[02:31:08.120 --> 02:31:11.120]  Music
[02:31:11.120 --> 02:31:14.120]  Music
[02:31:14.120 --> 02:31:17.120]  Music
[02:31:17.120 --> 02:31:20.120]  Music
[02:31:20.120 --> 02:31:23.120]  Music
[02:31:23.120 --> 02:31:26.120]  Music
[02:31:29.120 --> 02:31:32.120]  Music
[02:31:32.120 --> 02:31:35.120]  Music
[02:31:35.120 --> 02:31:38.120]  Music
[02:31:38.120 --> 02:31:41.120]  Music
[02:31:41.120 --> 02:31:44.120]  Music
[02:31:44.120 --> 02:31:47.120]  Music
[02:31:47.120 --> 02:31:50.120]  Music
[02:31:50.120 --> 02:31:53.120]  Music
[02:31:56.120 --> 02:31:59.120]  Music
[02:31:59.120 --> 02:32:02.120]  Music
[02:32:02.120 --> 02:32:05.120]  Music
[02:32:05.120 --> 02:32:08.120]  Music
[02:32:08.120 --> 02:32:11.120]  Music
[02:32:11.120 --> 02:32:14.120]  Music
[02:32:18.120 --> 02:32:21.120]  Music
[02:32:24.120 --> 02:32:27.120]  Music
[02:32:27.120 --> 02:32:34.560]  to so they don't bother. When you ask, when you file a debt validation letter and ask for a complete
[02:32:34.560 --> 02:32:42.720]  accounting of all of the credits and debits to the account, they don't have that either.
[02:32:44.160 --> 02:32:51.440]  How old is your mortgage? We literally just got it. I was trying to stop you there earlier.
[02:32:51.440 --> 02:32:55.520]  This isn't something we defaulted on eight years in because of the banking crisis. We
[02:32:55.520 --> 02:32:59.440]  literally just got the home and I'm already telling you that they're... Wait a minute,
[02:32:59.440 --> 02:33:05.360]  wait a minute. You are sounding really muffled. I'm having trouble understanding you. He said
[02:33:05.360 --> 02:33:10.960]  this wasn't something years ago. They just got it. It's like two months ago and this wasn't about
[02:33:10.960 --> 02:33:17.440]  they defaulted or anything. This is just right now. Okay. I already know they're wrong right now.
[02:33:18.080 --> 02:33:25.120]  Okay, so what do you want to do with this mortgage? I can guarantee you the mortgage is fraudulent.
[02:33:26.240 --> 02:33:29.600]  Yes. So what are they trying to do to you?
[02:33:32.000 --> 02:33:38.880]  They're not coming off the cuff about taking either the 45... Well, we told them just pay us
[02:33:38.880 --> 02:33:44.160]  out the $4,500 that you weren't supposed to have in there. We were going to utilize that. And yes,
[02:33:44.160 --> 02:33:49.920]  I would pay the interest on it. But since they haven't done that for virtually two months now,
[02:33:49.920 --> 02:33:54.960]  since we discovered this issue... Oh, goody. That's enough.
[02:33:55.680 --> 02:33:59.680]  And then I got a threat from their service manager that if I didn't do
[02:33:59.680 --> 02:34:05.600]  the utilities for this before something like I'm her subcontractor, which I'm not, they work for me,
[02:34:07.280 --> 02:34:13.120]  then she wasn't going to turn in to have this righted wrong. So that's all I needed from her
[02:34:13.120 --> 02:34:18.560]  in writing. And now I'm telling you that these people aren't even... They've got a
[02:34:19.120 --> 02:34:25.360]  manufactured home license. They're claiming here. But when I pulled up the Secretary of State,
[02:34:25.360 --> 02:34:32.960]  the Texas Comptroller's side, they all showed non-exist... No, not non-exist, expired. What do
[02:34:32.960 --> 02:34:39.200]  you... How do they term it? There's a term for it. They're either in compliance or they're...
[02:34:39.200 --> 02:34:46.720]  Not in good standing? Well, they've expired or they're not used anymore. They're... Hang on.
[02:34:49.680 --> 02:34:55.120]  Inactive or something like that. Yes. And everybody in this address is inactive right now.
[02:34:57.040 --> 02:35:01.840]  So they're not allowed to do business in Texas?
[02:35:02.480 --> 02:35:10.080]  Every... In every form I've got has the name of the... The name that they use is not...
[02:35:10.080 --> 02:35:14.880]  Oh, wow. Okay. This goes to fraud.
[02:35:15.680 --> 02:35:20.480]  So in discovery, could he go and ask for everybody else's information that they've
[02:35:20.480 --> 02:35:25.280]  been doing this with and find out how many other customers are getting defrauded? And then he could
[02:35:25.280 --> 02:35:34.640]  go after all others similarly situated? Okay. I'm not clear on how you're being defrauded.
[02:35:36.960 --> 02:35:40.960]  Well, number one, they won't turn over money that they... They already admitted that they
[02:35:40.960 --> 02:35:48.400]  had wrong... Okay. Wait. Are you talking about the mortgage company or some third-party company?
[02:35:49.440 --> 02:35:52.720]  You know what? That's a good point, Randy. I apologize. The retailer,
[02:35:53.680 --> 02:35:56.720]  since we're talking about homes, there's a retailer, which would be
[02:35:56.720 --> 02:36:02.560]  just like if you had a builder and if it was built on site. I got a retailer is the one who
[02:36:02.560 --> 02:36:10.000]  did the harm. The mortgage company technically doesn't even know that they're... Oh, wow.
[02:36:10.000 --> 02:36:15.200]  I've already made them aware. Okay. If this guy did the harm,
[02:36:15.200 --> 02:36:19.120]  but he... Did you hire this guy or did the mortgage company hire this guy?
[02:36:20.000 --> 02:36:25.680]  No, we're buying it. We bought the home through this retailer who's apparently not even... I
[02:36:25.680 --> 02:36:33.200]  think their license was expired when they even did this. So the bank authorized the loan
[02:36:34.560 --> 02:36:44.720]  through a real estate... What is he? A dealer? An unlicensed dealer?
[02:36:44.720 --> 02:36:48.640]  Yes. Yes. MHD, mobile home dealer in Texas. That's what they're calling...
[02:36:48.640 --> 02:36:53.360]  Oh, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Are you saying that the bank did not do their due diligence?
[02:36:54.320 --> 02:37:00.000]  I am telling... Actually, the bank is in Tennessee. The lender is in Tennessee.
[02:37:00.000 --> 02:37:07.920]  Wonderful. So you get to drag them into federal court and since the real property is in Texas,
[02:37:08.080 --> 02:37:10.720]  they have to come to Texas.
[02:37:12.320 --> 02:37:23.760]  Gotcha. And whatever this amount is, you can claim it in triplicate, is this lending institution,
[02:37:25.200 --> 02:37:30.240]  do they work with this? Did they come to you through this dealer?
[02:37:31.040 --> 02:37:33.120]  Yes, they did. The dealer brought them to us.
[02:37:34.080 --> 02:37:40.800]  So does that give you reason to believe that perhaps you're not the only one being defrauded
[02:37:40.800 --> 02:37:46.960]  in this way? It gives me reason to believe it as a personal reasonable prudent, sir.
[02:37:48.160 --> 02:37:52.880]  Then that goes to a private attorney general type suit, like Brett was saying.
[02:37:52.880 --> 02:38:02.480]  Okay. It's all about the money. So you sue them for fraud and under fraud,
[02:38:02.480 --> 02:38:10.160]  you ask for punitive triple. And if this amount of money is added to your mortgage,
[02:38:12.400 --> 02:38:16.560]  how much would it cost you over the life of the mortgage?
[02:38:16.560 --> 02:38:19.280]  Gotcha.
[02:38:19.280 --> 02:38:25.360]  Okay. That's kind of rhetorical. The reason I say that is when you sue for fraud,
[02:38:26.080 --> 02:38:33.440]  you do not sue for the amount you were actually defrauded of. You sue for the amount you would
[02:38:33.440 --> 02:38:40.400]  have been defrauded of had their plan ran to fruition, but you don't sue for that amount
[02:38:40.400 --> 02:38:50.960]  either. You sue for triplicate. So $4,500 added to your mortgage for, is it a 20 or 30 year?
[02:38:53.120 --> 02:38:56.720]  For 20, 24, 25 years.
[02:38:57.600 --> 02:39:02.000]  25 years. What interest are you paying?
[02:39:03.920 --> 02:39:08.960]  You gotta ask me that on here. Sorry, man. Is that the end of my rope here? It's 10%. Sorry.
[02:39:08.960 --> 02:39:12.400]  We just had to do it here. It's the horrible market, but my house burnt and I don't have any
[02:39:12.400 --> 02:39:19.760]  options at the moment. Great. I couldn't get that. Did you get that Brett? 10%.
[02:39:19.760 --> 02:39:28.320]  I'm sorry. Yeah, it's 10. It's over 10%. Again, we had to buy the most possible time in creation.
[02:39:28.320 --> 02:39:32.400]  Wait, Steven, wait. Do you realize this, the higher number, the better?
[02:39:33.360 --> 02:39:40.080]  Because whatever, a tiny amount of, if at least $30 and you're talking about $4,500 they're trying
[02:39:40.080 --> 02:39:48.000]  to defraud you of, amortize that over 25 years at 10%, that's going to be a crazy number. And then
[02:39:48.000 --> 02:39:54.080]  you triple that. That's your amount that you're suing for. And then times, however many other
[02:39:54.080 --> 02:40:00.640]  people could also be involved. Let's say you do some discovery and you find out that this fly by
[02:40:00.640 --> 02:40:06.320]  night bunch over here that's trying to pretend like they're dealers. They've done this to
[02:40:06.320 --> 02:40:14.000]  say 20 other people. So now you've got your crazy amount of $4,500 amortized over 25 years at 10%
[02:40:14.560 --> 02:40:20.800]  times three times 20 people. Wait a minute. There's a huge fraud.
[02:40:20.800 --> 02:40:29.040]  There are factors here I haven't dealt with often, but it could well be that
[02:40:29.760 --> 02:40:36.720]  since the company is not allowed to do business in Texas, they may forfeit everything.
[02:40:39.040 --> 02:40:44.160]  This would take some research into Texas law, but I think if they're not allowed to do business in
[02:40:44.160 --> 02:40:52.640]  Texas and the lending company used them, then the lending company may forfeit everything.
[02:40:52.640 --> 02:40:54.800]  Hang on Randy. We'll be right back.
[02:40:59.040 --> 02:41:04.320]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds of
[02:41:04.320 --> 02:41:10.400]  thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on
[02:41:10.400 --> 02:41:16.480]  or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the
[02:41:16.480 --> 02:41:24.240]  claims cost? The CHAMP plan is a section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides
[02:41:24.240 --> 02:41:31.840]  your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero
[02:41:31.840 --> 02:41:38.960]  copay. If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes. As an
[02:41:38.960 --> 02:41:45.440]  employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes. The CHAMP plan
[02:41:45.440 --> 02:41:52.080]  can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit. Call Scott
[02:41:52.080 --> 02:42:02.720]  at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[02:42:03.360 --> 02:42:08.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable easy to understand
[02:42:09.520 --> 02:42:16.640]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your
[02:42:16.640 --> 02:42:21.440]  lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[02:42:22.240 --> 02:42:28.640]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[02:42:28.640 --> 02:42:35.600]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[02:42:35.600 --> 02:42:40.880]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[02:42:40.880 --> 02:42:47.600]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[02:42:47.600 --> 02:42:54.800]  civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on
[02:42:54.800 --> 02:43:00.000]  the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY.
[02:43:25.120 --> 02:43:28.160]  I must be careful what I'm wishing for.
[02:43:29.520 --> 02:43:33.920]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[02:43:36.080 --> 02:43:42.240]  Okay, we are back. Randy Colson, Brett Fountain of Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Steve
[02:43:42.240 --> 02:43:48.960]  in Texas. Steve, you may be sitting in a better spot than you realize.
[02:43:49.920 --> 02:43:52.480]  When I would help people with mortgage issues,
[02:43:54.240 --> 02:44:01.360]  the first thing I would want them to do is take 50% of the mortgage
[02:44:02.720 --> 02:44:08.000]  and put in the mortgage payment and put it in an account every month.
[02:44:08.720 --> 02:44:17.360]  Because when you sue them, you stop paying. So if you take that amount that you would pay,
[02:44:17.440 --> 02:44:23.920]  if you can pay the full amount, put it in an account and hold it there.
[02:44:25.040 --> 02:44:27.520]  I can keep you in court for five to seven years easy.
[02:44:30.320 --> 02:44:35.680]  So you get to live in the property without paying for it while you're suing them.
[02:44:38.000 --> 02:44:44.160]  And if you put that money in an account, then you build up a lump sum that you can come to
[02:44:44.240 --> 02:44:49.600]  them somewhat later with and say, hey, let's make a deal.
[02:44:51.200 --> 02:44:55.040]  And you can probably get yourself a really good deal. Okay, with that said,
[02:44:56.960 --> 02:45:05.600]  if this company is out of state and they're processing their loans through a dealer
[02:45:06.160 --> 02:45:13.280]  who's not authorized to do business in Texas, then they have themselves a big time problem.
[02:45:15.120 --> 02:45:21.760]  Because they have no standing to come to Texas and try to collect their
[02:45:22.880 --> 02:45:28.960]  money because they're not authorized to do business. Wait a minute, unless
[02:45:32.160 --> 02:45:35.280]  this is a federal lending institution?
[02:45:35.280 --> 02:45:40.080]  I don't know the answer yet.
[02:45:46.160 --> 02:45:52.080]  That may not matter if they did business through this dealer.
[02:46:00.240 --> 02:46:02.800]  So you were brought to this lender by the dealer?
[02:46:03.760 --> 02:46:10.720]  Yes, that's also the convoluted part. They don't have a franchise license to pay the taxes.
[02:46:12.480 --> 02:46:19.760]  All the entities are inactive. Bingo. The mortgage company actually does show up.
[02:46:19.760 --> 02:46:25.280]  Let's see about them. Active. The mortgage company is active to do business in Texas.
[02:46:25.280 --> 02:46:27.200]  This is the freaking deep dealer, isn't it?
[02:46:32.400 --> 02:46:33.760]  That's a Delaware company.
[02:46:42.240 --> 02:46:43.680]  I'll have to think about how to...
[02:46:45.120 --> 02:46:48.960]  I didn't mean to get you too deep in the weeds tonight. I know it's almost 11 o'clock on the
[02:46:49.360 --> 02:46:55.600]  television. This is just one... The first thing I thought of was other than I wanted to
[02:46:55.600 --> 02:47:01.440]  assume and replicate probably for the $4,500 is how far off it made me think you're going
[02:47:01.440 --> 02:47:05.760]  through those HUD-1 statements. These people don't actually have a HUD-1 statement. It's a
[02:47:05.760 --> 02:47:16.080]  Texas equivalent. Does that make sense? Texas equivalent. He said they don't have a HUD-1
[02:47:16.080 --> 02:47:22.160]  settlement statement. They have a Texas equivalent. There has to be a federal...
[02:47:26.640 --> 02:47:30.160]  Unless it is substantially the same thing, it won't matter.
[02:47:36.160 --> 02:47:42.960]  If it's something that the federal government has accepted in place of the HUD-1 that that
[02:47:42.960 --> 02:47:54.080]  won't matter, it'll still be the same. Is it a legal-sized page with two-sided?
[02:47:56.880 --> 02:48:00.320]  Starts at $100 and goes to $1,400 on the backside?
[02:48:02.400 --> 02:48:07.280]  I don't have one like that at all. They're just a truth-in-lending disclosure.
[02:48:07.280 --> 02:48:18.720]  When you sat down to closing, were there any charges at closing added to the mortgage?
[02:48:21.840 --> 02:48:27.120]  Not that were specified. As I'm looking at this so-called itemization of the amount
[02:48:27.120 --> 02:48:33.440]  financed, they do have... They have some fees. They have a Texas form T fee. That's nice. They
[02:48:33.440 --> 02:48:43.280]  charge $100 for a Texas form. Another TDHCA fee, a flood determination and monitoring fee. I want
[02:48:43.920 --> 02:48:50.640]  $8 for that. Anyway, organization points fee. They have some fun little fees in here.
[02:48:52.160 --> 02:49:00.480]  Is there a warehousing fee, a document preparation fee, a flood assessment fee?
[02:49:03.760 --> 02:49:07.360]  Flood, yes. The flood determination and monitoring fee is on here.
[02:49:08.640 --> 02:49:09.920]  You're saying flood? Yes, sir.
[02:49:10.480 --> 02:49:13.760]  Okay. That's essentially the kind of stuff I would find on a HUD-1.
[02:49:15.040 --> 02:49:16.480]  Email me that. Let me look at it.
[02:49:17.520 --> 02:49:18.020]  Okay.
[02:49:18.880 --> 02:49:21.520]  Because they have to be able to prove up each one of those.
[02:49:22.560 --> 02:49:27.600]  And it's right at the top of that. The bottom stuff is more standard. That's where the flood
[02:49:28.320 --> 02:49:32.480]  is and the insurance is and the taxes. They're down at the bottom. Up at the top
[02:49:32.480 --> 02:49:39.760]  of where they add the various fees that the lenders and such add to it. And you'll see things
[02:49:39.760 --> 02:49:46.640]  like document, primarily document preparation fees. That's the one I love to get. And warehousing fees
[02:49:46.640 --> 02:49:52.960]  and I forget, there's a whole myriad of names they use for these different fees.
[02:49:54.880 --> 02:50:01.120]  And if you don't know exactly what it is and you haven't been given any documentation to support
[02:50:01.120 --> 02:50:13.520]  what it is, then the flood insurance, you should have receipts on that. They never give you any
[02:50:13.520 --> 02:50:20.000]  of that. They just put stuff on there. And so you just subtract all of that from the HUD-1
[02:50:20.000 --> 02:50:26.800]  settlement statement and demand that they prove it up. You sue them, demand they prove it up.
[02:50:26.800 --> 02:50:28.880]  If they can't prove up one of them, they're screwed.
[02:50:31.920 --> 02:50:36.080]  Especially if they can only prove up one of them at the other 12 or
[02:50:36.080 --> 02:50:39.760]  bogus, then what are they going to do? They can't just bring the one and say,
[02:50:39.760 --> 02:50:45.920]  let's only talk about this one. I have never had a bank prove up a single fee.
[02:50:47.680 --> 02:50:52.480]  And the reason they haven't proved up a single fee is because if they prove up one
[02:50:53.200 --> 02:50:58.640]  and don't prove up another, it creates the adverse inference that the one they didn't
[02:50:58.640 --> 02:51:04.880]  prove up was exactly what we said it was, fraud. So they never prove up any,
[02:51:04.880 --> 02:51:10.000]  and they try to fight it other ways. And that keeps them in court forever.
[02:51:13.200 --> 02:51:24.160]  So let me look at some of the documentation. But what do you want to do?
[02:51:29.280 --> 02:51:38.240]  It's not a tort letter, is it? Well, it is a tort letter. Again, isn't it?
[02:51:38.240 --> 02:51:46.960]  Notice you're being sued, or make me a note. Make me whole or be sued.
[02:51:50.240 --> 02:51:56.560]  Well, this is in foreclosure issues. I've helped over 750 people
[02:51:57.200 --> 02:52:03.200]  with foreclosure issues. I've never, ever sent a tort letter. Just sued them.
[02:52:05.920 --> 02:52:10.720]  They ignore tort letters. They don't take them serious. And if you give them tort letters,
[02:52:10.720 --> 02:52:23.280]  that gives them fair warning. You just sue them, and now you got their attention.
[02:52:23.840 --> 02:52:30.720]  Yeah, I'm trying to figure out which entity to sue at the moment. Now, the lender is an easy one,
[02:52:31.520 --> 02:52:36.400]  and they actually, like I said, they are registered in the state. It's these other
[02:52:36.400 --> 02:52:41.680]  cats. I'm trying to determine which ones. I want to bring it every one of these people who
[02:52:41.680 --> 02:52:50.160]  claim to have been the registered agent on the deceased entities or the... Anyway, several people
[02:52:50.960 --> 02:52:57.920]  Each one of those are likely to have some kind of bond or insurance program.
[02:53:00.480 --> 02:53:04.000]  Each one of them are susceptible to the stores doctrine.
[02:53:07.200 --> 02:53:16.240]  Let's make a deal. If any of them, well, anybody who's dealing with
[02:53:16.240 --> 02:53:25.360]  one of these illegal entities, they're acting in concert collusion, including the bank, the mortgage
[02:53:25.360 --> 02:53:33.200]  company. We were told that these were the people that we needed to go with because the other one
[02:53:33.200 --> 02:53:38.320]  wasn't being responsive. I don't know that I had proper evidence of that, so there were only a
[02:53:38.320 --> 02:53:44.160]  couple that we're looking at in the beginning. Fraud by non-disclosure.
[02:53:49.760 --> 02:53:52.240]  If they told you something that wasn't true,
[02:53:54.400 --> 02:54:01.680]  and you can show by inference that you have reason to believe that they knew it wasn't true,
[02:54:02.080 --> 02:54:08.240]  and they knew that you did not have access to the information to show that it wasn't true,
[02:54:09.440 --> 02:54:17.680]  and you believe their statement, and you took action based on your belief in that statement,
[02:54:18.880 --> 02:54:24.560]  and you were harmed thereby. That's fraud by non-disclosure. Fraud gets you triplicate.
[02:54:24.560 --> 02:54:33.760]  Fraud gets you triplicate. It's not what you can prove up at the end of the day
[02:54:33.760 --> 02:54:42.640]  that keeps you in court. It is the nature of your claim. If I sue you for parting your hair on the
[02:54:42.640 --> 02:54:50.000]  left, I'm going to get a rule 12b6 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
[02:54:50.560 --> 02:54:54.160]  If the court accepts all of my allegations as true,
[02:54:56.080 --> 02:54:59.120]  they will determine that I don't have a claim because it's not against law and
[02:54:59.120 --> 02:55:03.920]  partial hair on the left. That's what you've got to play to.
[02:55:04.960 --> 02:55:12.320]  So if what you claim is true, if this company does not have the authority to do business in Texas,
[02:55:12.320 --> 02:55:16.560]  and the lending company and these other companies are working with this illegal company,
[02:55:17.520 --> 02:55:23.040]  and you can make the allegation that they misrepresented the truth to you, especially over
[02:55:23.040 --> 02:55:30.960]  this $4,500, if all your accusations are accepted by the court as true, you would have a claim.
[02:55:30.960 --> 02:55:36.240]  You stay in court. Whether you can prove it up at the end of the day or not, you're in court.
[02:55:36.240 --> 02:55:40.080]  You go to discovery. That's going to cost them a fortune. They'll make you a deal.
[02:55:40.080 --> 02:55:45.200]  We'll be right back.
[02:55:49.120 --> 02:55:53.040]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[02:55:53.040 --> 02:55:58.640]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[02:55:58.640 --> 02:56:03.440]  can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[02:56:03.440 --> 02:56:08.160]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of
[02:56:08.160 --> 02:56:12.320]  footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[02:56:12.320 --> 02:56:17.360]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[02:56:17.360 --> 02:56:23.280]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[02:56:23.280 --> 02:56:29.760]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version
[02:56:29.760 --> 02:56:35.360]  and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free
[02:56:35.360 --> 02:56:48.080]  at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[02:57:00.000 --> 02:57:04.880]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution.
[02:57:04.880 --> 02:57:08.320]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[02:57:08.320 --> 02:57:12.400]  Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an
[02:57:12.400 --> 02:57:15.680]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[02:57:16.240 --> 02:57:21.760]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[02:57:21.760 --> 02:57:26.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:57:26.560 --> 02:57:31.840]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:57:31.840 --> 02:57:36.480]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[02:57:36.480 --> 02:57:41.920]  Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:57:41.920 --> 02:57:48.560]  Start over with Startpage. Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back
[02:57:48.560 --> 02:57:53.360]  the covers and find a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping
[02:57:53.360 --> 02:57:57.840]  here tonight. That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the
[02:57:57.840 --> 02:58:02.400]  Third Amendment was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes
[02:58:02.400 --> 02:58:08.000]  with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment?
[02:58:08.000 --> 02:58:12.320]  Get it? So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[02:58:12.320 --> 02:58:16.560]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[02:58:16.560 --> 02:58:20.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:58:31.120 --> 02:58:35.440]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee
[02:58:35.440 --> 02:58:40.320]  the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr.
[02:58:40.320 --> 02:58:44.320]  Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your
[02:58:44.320 --> 02:58:50.560]  constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never
[02:58:50.560 --> 02:58:56.560]  get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[02:58:56.560 --> 02:59:02.720]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[02:59:02.720 --> 02:59:07.920]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[02:59:07.920 --> 02:59:13.840]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[02:59:15.520 --> 02:59:20.400]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray
[02:59:20.400 --> 02:59:25.280]  goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from
[02:59:25.280 --> 02:59:30.960]  unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you? Get it? Unfortunately,
[02:59:30.960 --> 02:59:35.680]  the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point,
[02:59:35.680 --> 02:59:41.120]  TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees demand a peep at your
[02:59:41.120 --> 02:59:46.080]  privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[02:59:46.080 --> 02:59:50.960]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to
[02:59:50.960 --> 02:59:57.200]  take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:01:05.680 --> 03:01:19.200]  Okay, we are back. We're talking to Steve in Texas. But Steve,
[03:01:20.240 --> 03:01:25.280]  this is too complicated to do on this show. Send me an email.
[03:01:28.160 --> 03:01:35.120]  Write me kind of a timeline, synopsis of what's going on, and I will send you the spreadsheet.
[03:01:36.080 --> 03:01:41.840]  And some suggestions. All right, I appreciate it. And
[03:01:44.160 --> 03:01:48.080]  I was going to get back something else that had come up earlier on the show,
[03:01:48.080 --> 03:01:54.400]  because at the end of the day, I've still got a little bit longer on the
[03:01:54.400 --> 03:02:01.200]  back when the city came in and then demolished our place and that the whole another long lead
[03:02:01.200 --> 03:02:06.800]  time and everything. You know, I really, I really feel, man, the more I listen to Ted back in the
[03:02:06.800 --> 03:02:14.960]  day, that man's got to hurt. It hurt just going through timelines and trying to put something
[03:02:14.960 --> 03:02:23.360]  together on that. Every time I go back through it, it sets me off. And without any dots being-
[03:02:23.360 --> 03:02:24.320]  Yeah, that's true.
[03:02:24.880 --> 03:02:34.800]  I'm glad you said that. You hear me ask people for a timeline?
[03:02:35.520 --> 03:02:36.560]  Yeah, it's not easy.
[03:02:36.560 --> 03:02:43.280]  Yeah, it's not so much that I need the timeline. But if someone is unable to produce a timeline,
[03:02:44.240 --> 03:02:48.400]  I'm not going to be able to help them. And sometimes when someone's been in the fight too long,
[03:02:49.040 --> 03:02:54.160]  it gets too traumatic. I ask for a timeline and I try to tell them,
[03:02:54.160 --> 03:03:01.120]  do not give me a full statement. Just this happened on this day and this happened on this day
[03:03:01.120 --> 03:03:09.840]  because I'm trying to give them a way to get past the pathos, past the emotional responses
[03:03:09.840 --> 03:03:15.040]  to all of the bad things that happened. So don't explain everything. Just say,
[03:03:15.040 --> 03:03:19.200]  oh, this day this happened, this day this happened. It don't matter if you get everything,
[03:03:19.200 --> 03:03:27.600]  just run down the line. And then tomorrow, the next day, go back and just cruise over it.
[03:03:27.600 --> 03:03:30.880]  And your brain will say, wait a minute, something happened here, something happened here,
[03:03:30.880 --> 03:03:35.600]  something happened here. I didn't put it away. Then come back to it. You will fill in these
[03:03:35.600 --> 03:03:44.240]  empty places without getting so involved in how badly this affected you. I know this is
[03:03:44.240 --> 03:03:50.560]  extremely difficult. And so that's what I want. When I went back through it, it dawned on me,
[03:03:50.560 --> 03:03:55.680]  well, there's a reason why we never trusted this actor for the city, this guy who's in person,
[03:03:55.680 --> 03:04:01.200]  because he came to me multiple other times, the multiple other titles, the crap that I knew
[03:04:01.200 --> 03:04:08.400]  didn't exist. And we didn't trust him. Nobody trust him. And anyway, he was never appointed
[03:04:08.400 --> 03:04:15.280]  to do anything in the first place. What needs to be in time? So I mean, the multiple times while
[03:04:15.280 --> 03:04:21.360]  we came to never have any belief in this man whatsoever, he's just out committing fraud or
[03:04:21.360 --> 03:04:30.480]  anything, unlawful acts every time I turn around. So I really wasn't, you know what? I'll just stop
[03:04:30.480 --> 03:04:36.160]  there. I need to be able to put it in writing, like I said, and I apologize. Man, I feel for Ted.
[03:04:36.160 --> 03:04:41.520]  After having everything that we had stored over there, we used it as storage.
[03:04:42.720 --> 03:04:47.920]  Every time it comes back to something that we would have had, even my kid's Christmas decorations,
[03:04:47.920 --> 03:04:53.120]  my old stuff from my childhood, Christmas day, you know, stuff like that was put out for other
[03:04:53.120 --> 03:04:58.400]  people to pick through. I found out from my neighbors, stuff like that. And then my own,
[03:04:58.400 --> 03:05:03.440]  and then the one home that I live in, that goes down this year in the middle of it. My parents
[03:05:03.440 --> 03:05:08.480]  are now out of the hospital. Well, they're just in the hospital now. I'm the same, but man,
[03:05:08.480 --> 03:05:13.840]  I feel for Ted. I understand the pain and I've been listening to him for years only to
[03:05:15.120 --> 03:05:19.280]  live through my own passion. I just hadn't had the heart attack yet. God help me. I don't.
[03:05:20.800 --> 03:05:27.520]  Well, one solution to that is to give them the heart attack.
[03:05:28.640 --> 03:05:29.440]  Yes, sir.
[03:05:29.520 --> 03:05:36.480]  It looks like you're on track to do that now. When you become the plaintiff, it is a whole other
[03:05:36.480 --> 03:05:44.080]  animal. All right, guys. Well, let's go for the season. I greatly appreciate it. If nothing else,
[03:05:44.080 --> 03:05:50.400]  just hearing y'all go through these things, eventually it sinks in. I appreciate your time.
[03:05:50.400 --> 03:05:58.000]  God bless you. Okay. Take care, Steve. Okay. Now we're going to John in New York. John.
[03:05:59.680 --> 03:06:05.760]  What do you have for us today? Well, I've got an update on the assessments, the unfair,
[03:06:06.480 --> 03:06:13.200]  obviously unfair assessments in my town. All right. It's clear that they were unjust.
[03:06:13.200 --> 03:06:16.800]  Some of them were unjust. Hold on. Hold on. Too many pronouns.
[03:06:17.680 --> 03:06:24.400]  You're starting in the middle of something. The assessment likes referential index. He means one
[03:06:24.960 --> 03:06:31.040]  previously mentioned, but did you not? What? Who's they?
[03:06:32.480 --> 03:06:39.520]  Well, you think it stopped me and we all progress has halted now. So let me continue. Here we go.
[03:06:39.520 --> 03:06:44.720]  Stop John. Stop John. Don't do that. Can't continue from that. Don't start in the middle
[03:06:44.720 --> 03:06:49.920]  and run for 20 minutes and then go back to the beginning because we won't have any clues. What
[03:06:49.920 --> 03:06:53.680]  the hell are you talking about? Start at the beginning. What are you going to tell us?
[03:06:55.360 --> 03:06:59.360]  You stopped me from explaining. What are you going to tell us?
[03:07:02.720 --> 03:07:09.280]  Okay. Can I talk now? No, I'm not going to sit here and use half the show while you're running
[03:07:09.280 --> 03:07:13.040]  on and on. And we have no idea what the hell you're talking about. And you're refusing
[03:07:13.040 --> 03:07:17.760]  him to tell us what else is going on here. You're not giving me a chance to open my mouth.
[03:07:17.760 --> 03:07:28.480]  I think, John, I think he's just saying stop, stop, stop saying the assessment and stop saying
[03:07:28.480 --> 03:07:35.440]  they instead tell us a little more context for this. Cause we don't know. We don't have any way
[03:07:35.440 --> 03:07:40.880]  to understand what you're saying. You want to continue talking about if you don't first
[03:07:40.880 --> 03:07:48.800]  give a little intro to say, what's this about? John, you did radio. First thing you do is tell
[03:07:48.800 --> 03:07:54.720]  us what you're going to tell us. Then tell us, then tell us what you told us. What are you going
[03:07:54.720 --> 03:08:02.160]  to tell us? Give us some reference index. Here we go. What are you going to talk about? More
[03:08:02.160 --> 03:08:05.840]  information. Well, you stopped me right in the middle of what I was saying.
[03:08:05.840 --> 03:08:14.000]  I'm going to mute you, John, if you're going to fight with me. This is my show. This is not your
[03:08:14.000 --> 03:08:24.400]  show. I know it's not my show. What are you going to tell us? Oh my God. Just tell us. Oh my God.
[03:08:24.400 --> 03:08:27.600]  Don't start griping a bitch. And what are you going to tell us? Just tell us.
[03:08:27.600 --> 03:08:35.760]  Okay. Now I need a whole 30 seconds to tell you. Here we go.
[03:08:37.280 --> 03:08:40.240]  Oh, you're not going to start in the middle of something. We're not going to sit here and waste
[03:08:40.240 --> 03:08:46.800]  all this show for you to get around to a point. Figure out what you're going to tell us. I'll come
[03:08:46.800 --> 03:08:55.760]  back to you later. Okay. We're going to Malika in Pennsylvania. Hello Malika. What do you have for
[03:08:55.760 --> 03:09:07.520]  us today? I know you've been hanging on for, oh, it's just 30 minutes. You must have called back.
[03:09:09.280 --> 03:09:14.800]  Malika, are you there? Malika, Pennsylvania. We talked to her last week. What was it, Brett?
[03:09:14.800 --> 03:09:19.360]  Yeah. I don't recall what her issue was. I do recall the name.
[03:09:19.360 --> 03:09:30.320]  Malika, are you there? You might be muted on your end. You might have your phone on mute there.
[03:09:30.320 --> 03:09:42.800]  We're not hearing you yet. Okay. I'm going to leave you unmuted and we're going to go to Bob in California.
[03:09:42.800 --> 03:09:55.200]  Hello Bob. Hello, how are you? I am good. I'm still getting over a photograph you sent me.
[03:09:57.920 --> 03:10:04.080]  For everybody else, this is Bob in California. Bob in California sent me a photograph.
[03:10:06.160 --> 03:10:11.680]  Stop cackling, you chump. He sent me a photograph of his hemorrhoid operation.
[03:10:13.040 --> 03:10:19.200]  Nobody would do such a thing. I will never be able to scrape that image off the back of my eyeballs.
[03:10:22.800 --> 03:10:29.840]  What kind of guy would do a thing like that? What do you have for us today, chump?
[03:10:31.760 --> 03:10:40.000]  I have a question about your, you know, I put in a preservation of rights where I said that any
[03:10:40.400 --> 03:10:47.760]  a motion would be in writing, the judge would respond with
[03:10:51.040 --> 03:10:51.920]  findings and facts.
[03:10:53.200 --> 03:11:00.480]  Yeah. How, of course they didn't do that. They just denied it out of hand. How do you
[03:11:01.200 --> 03:11:10.400]  press them to give the findings and facts? The state court or federal?
[03:11:12.080 --> 03:11:21.200]  State. Okay. Rule, what is it, 53? Where at in the Fed it requires findings and
[03:11:21.200 --> 03:11:28.240]  fact and conclusions? I don't remember which rule, but yeah, that's part of what they have to render
[03:11:28.240 --> 03:11:32.400]  when they say the things are a certain way. Here's my ruling. They have to explain
[03:11:33.520 --> 03:11:38.800]  how they found those facts and those findings have to each be filtered through the federal
[03:11:38.800 --> 03:11:46.080]  rules of evidence. What I'm going to suggest is what I did in a pleading I wrote recently
[03:11:47.120 --> 03:11:56.240]  is I asked the court to read every article in every pleading and rule on each element
[03:11:56.880 --> 03:12:07.120]  in accordance with the federal rules of procedure. 55, is it 55 or 53A? I think it's 53A.
[03:12:09.120 --> 03:12:16.640]  53A, and that's the one that requires the federal court to provide findings and fact and conclusion,
[03:12:17.520 --> 03:12:27.760]  excuse me, conclusions at law and ask the court, notice the court that while the federal rules of
[03:12:27.760 --> 03:12:36.800]  civil procedure are not controlling in the state court, move the state court to use federal rules
[03:12:36.800 --> 03:12:45.280]  of civil procedure as advisory and provide you with findings of fact as a failure to do so,
[03:12:46.000 --> 03:12:54.960]  deny you your right to appeal as they fail to give you notice of their application of the law
[03:12:54.960 --> 03:13:00.640]  to the facts. Yeah, how can you appeal something if you don't know why they came up with what they did?
[03:13:01.840 --> 03:13:11.280]  And if the court refuses, then petition for writ of mandamus asking the appellate court to order
[03:13:11.360 --> 03:13:17.520]  trial court to provide you with findings of fact and conclusions so that you may
[03:13:18.400 --> 03:13:25.200]  able to appeal your case. And that's rule 52. So what you were talking about earlier,
[03:13:25.200 --> 03:13:34.720]  I just looked it up. It's 52. Okay. All right. Send me an email, but don't put your pictures in.
[03:13:35.440 --> 03:13:39.360]  I'll send you this motion that I together that addresses that.
[03:13:42.720 --> 03:13:48.560]  Hang on. I have to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton. Okay. I'll talk to you. Video.
[03:13:49.840 --> 03:13:56.560]  Shut up, Bob. I'm doing an outro. You can't talk in and out. I'm going to have John to explain it.
[03:13:59.200 --> 03:14:03.760]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[03:14:04.240 --> 03:14:09.840]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method. Michael Maris has won six cases
[03:14:09.840 --> 03:14:14.640]  in federal court against debt collectors. And now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[03:14:14.640 --> 03:14:19.680]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[03:14:19.680 --> 03:14:25.440]  what to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[03:14:25.440 --> 03:14:30.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them
[03:14:30.000 --> 03:14:36.160]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to
[03:14:36.160 --> 03:14:41.040]  stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[03:14:41.040 --> 03:14:46.240]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email
[03:14:46.240 --> 03:14:56.160]  michaelmaris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[03:14:56.240 --> 03:15:01.760]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this network,
[03:15:01.760 --> 03:15:06.240]  I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going
[03:15:06.240 --> 03:15:11.840]  back. I need my truth fixed. I'd be lost without logos. And I really want to help keep this network
[03:15:11.840 --> 03:15:15.600]  on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I
[03:15:15.600 --> 03:15:21.200]  really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[03:15:21.200 --> 03:15:26.320]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. You
[03:15:26.320 --> 03:15:31.680]  can order your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to
[03:15:31.680 --> 03:15:38.320]  logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from
[03:15:38.320 --> 03:15:44.560]  Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do
[03:15:44.560 --> 03:15:50.640]  anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow,
[03:15:50.640 --> 03:15:56.000]  giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[03:15:56.000 --> 03:16:06.000]  We are welcome. Happy holidays, logos. This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[03:16:20.640 --> 03:16:48.000]  If I can't get everything I want, if I can't get everything I need,
[03:16:51.440 --> 03:17:00.000]  I'm gonna get a ranger.
[03:17:02.800 --> 03:17:03.520]  What the heck?
[03:17:13.120 --> 03:17:18.640]  Okay, we are back. I think I scared Bob away.
[03:17:19.600 --> 03:17:22.400]  He can't see me anymore in ugly pictures.
[03:17:26.560 --> 03:17:31.200]  Yeah, maybe he wanted to describe something for you to have a mental image over the air.
[03:17:33.360 --> 03:17:36.480]  Turns out that wasn't gonna work out. Well, Malika, if you're there,
[03:17:37.520 --> 03:17:42.640]  we weren't able to hear you. Please feel free to call back. We would love to talk with you.
[03:17:43.600 --> 03:17:50.560]  Okay, and behind the callers, so let's go to something we were talking about on Telegram.
[03:17:50.560 --> 03:18:02.160]  When I sued all these highest judges, I sued them with Carabel. Carabel is going after the local
[03:18:03.200 --> 03:18:08.480]  school in Lakewood, Texas. It's a western suburb of Austin.
[03:18:09.040 --> 03:18:20.480]  And she's put on the Telegram channel a video of her where she was thrown out of a
[03:18:22.320 --> 03:18:31.440]  school board meeting. She's telling the Lakewood police chief that threw her out,
[03:18:32.400 --> 03:18:37.200]  that she has evidence of a $3 million worth of embezzlement.
[03:18:38.800 --> 03:18:42.720]  And the chief of police tells her that he doesn't care.
[03:18:45.040 --> 03:18:51.520]  And he threw her out, and he stomps away. So I saw this video,
[03:18:53.200 --> 03:19:00.240]  and based on seeing this video, I have reason to believe and do believe that this
[03:19:01.040 --> 03:19:04.560]  person named, let's refer to him as Baldy,
[03:19:06.320 --> 03:19:16.960]  home to home, that he, on having been given notice that a crime has been committed,
[03:19:16.960 --> 03:19:22.560]  he failed to give notice to some magistrate in accordance with his duty under Article 2.3,
[03:19:22.880 --> 03:19:26.720]  Paragraph C of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[03:19:28.480 --> 03:19:33.840]  And by so doing, committed the criminal act of official misconduct or official oppression,
[03:19:34.880 --> 03:19:40.960]  39.03 Penal Code, in that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform,
[03:19:42.400 --> 03:19:49.280]  denied Cara in the full and free access to or enjoyment of her right to the equal protection
[03:19:49.280 --> 03:19:52.880]  laws in the state of Texas. It's class A misdemeanor in Texas.
[03:19:54.960 --> 03:20:01.840]  This officer too have done that thing. And in the hall at the time, two or three other officers,
[03:20:03.040 --> 03:20:11.760]  each of whom had a duty to arrest Baldy, and they failed to do so. So
[03:20:12.480 --> 03:20:20.800]  I will prepare, I have a T-Code complaint, fill in the blank, PDF.
[03:20:22.080 --> 03:20:27.920]  I'll fill in the pertinent information. I'm going to load that on the Telegram channel.
[03:20:29.040 --> 03:20:36.560]  Anybody who wants it can click on it and watch the video. I'll actually put a link to the video
[03:20:36.800 --> 03:20:42.800]  T-Code complaint and the criminal complaints.
[03:20:46.000 --> 03:20:56.240]  There's a really sweet sound bite in the middle of this video that was shared, where the citizen
[03:20:56.320 --> 03:21:06.880]  says, yeah, I've got proof right here that those people embezzled millions of dollars of taxpayer
[03:21:06.880 --> 03:21:16.880]  money. And this or here Baldy, he says, you know, they don't work for me. I don't really care.
[03:21:19.840 --> 03:21:23.920]  Oh, that's a beautiful little sound bite that I'm sure would come back to bite him.
[03:21:24.080 --> 03:21:28.240]  Well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you.
[03:21:30.240 --> 03:21:34.880]  So what I would like, is anybody interested, if you're listening to the show and you're not aware,
[03:21:34.880 --> 03:21:41.520]  we have a Telegram channel. Telegram is an app, you have to load it on your phone,
[03:21:42.080 --> 03:21:46.000]  once you have it loaded on your phone, and from there you can load it on your computer.
[03:21:46.880 --> 03:21:55.600]  It's just one of these chat apps that's not censored. We have a channel on there called
[03:21:55.600 --> 03:22:03.840]  the Law Society. It's got about 2,500 people in it. Randy, something has happened with your audio.
[03:22:03.840 --> 03:22:09.520]  It sounds like did something just switch? You switched to another mic or your system?
[03:22:09.520 --> 03:22:14.480]  I think I bumped the mic and moved it. This thing's real sensitive.
[03:22:15.200 --> 03:22:22.000]  Okay, perfect. Yeah, back to normal. If you go to that channel, you'll be able to download these.
[03:22:22.000 --> 03:22:30.160]  I'll do a criminal complaint and a TECO, professional conduct complaint. Anybody can
[03:22:30.160 --> 03:22:38.400]  download it and fill in their name at the top and send it in. TECO complaints are bad news.
[03:22:39.040 --> 03:22:44.880]  This law enforcement agency is a law enforcement agency for the school.
[03:22:46.160 --> 03:22:53.440]  It's not a city law, it's the school itself has its own police force. And it appears as though the
[03:22:53.440 --> 03:23:05.120]  police in the school district is shielding school district members from prosecution for
[03:23:06.080 --> 03:23:08.400]  embezzlement on the order of $3 million.
[03:23:11.440 --> 03:23:21.920]  So that could get, I'll talk to Kara and I'll put together a set of criminal complaints.
[03:23:23.920 --> 03:23:31.280]  And anybody who's interested in just working the system, people get into criminal issues and
[03:23:31.840 --> 03:23:39.360]  they're like Stephen was earlier when he's just trying to write a timeline.
[03:23:39.360 --> 03:23:47.520]  It's so emotionally compelling for it. It's very difficult. When you are the plaintiff
[03:23:48.640 --> 03:23:56.000]  or when you are the complaintant, like we say on the show, the best fight to have
[03:23:56.000 --> 03:24:04.560]  is the one you picked. So in this case, you watch this video and based on this video,
[03:24:04.560 --> 03:24:14.960]  you have reason to believe and do believe that this officer committed this act of shielding
[03:24:16.240 --> 03:24:22.560]  these school board members from prosecution by failing to perform a duty he is required to
[03:24:22.560 --> 03:24:30.480]  perform. And the duty he is required to perform is stipulated by article 2.13 paragraph C,
[03:24:31.360 --> 03:24:37.760]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which directs a peace officer if on having it made known to
[03:24:37.760 --> 03:24:43.280]  him that a crime has been committed, he shall give notice to some magistrate.
[03:24:44.000 --> 03:24:44.500]  Mm-hmm.
[03:24:45.280 --> 03:24:53.280]  Well, Miss Bell gave this officer reason to believe that a crime had been committed
[03:24:53.280 --> 03:25:00.640]  that invoked his duty under article 2.13. He failed to perform the duty he was required to perform
[03:25:01.840 --> 03:25:10.000]  in violation of 39.03 Texas Penal Code. And in the process denied Miss Bell and the full and free
[03:25:10.000 --> 03:25:18.640]  access to or enjoyment of her right to the equal protection of the laws under Article 1,
[03:25:18.640 --> 03:25:28.160]  Section 10 of the Texas Constitution and under article under the 14th Amendment to the Federal
[03:25:28.160 --> 03:25:39.600]  Constitution. And that's an act of official oppression under 39.03 Penal Code,
[03:25:39.600 --> 03:25:47.600]  but he did so in order to shield these public officials from prosecution in violation of
[03:25:47.600 --> 03:25:50.480]  3805 Penal Code. Yes.
[03:25:51.200 --> 03:25:58.160]  Which is a felony in the state of Texas. A felony of the third degree.
[03:26:00.160 --> 03:26:06.320]  I have reason to believe and do believe he committed these crimes. And there were at least
[03:26:06.320 --> 03:26:17.760]  two other officers present, officers whose names I do not have, and so I can file complaints against
[03:26:17.760 --> 03:26:26.160]  unknown officers to be determined on discovery and file against them.
[03:26:27.040 --> 03:26:35.280]  Yeah, we've also got 3606 Penal Code, obstruction, retaliation. This obstruction, because
[03:26:36.160 --> 03:26:41.120]  if they had, well, if it had been-
[03:26:41.120 --> 03:26:42.080]  Well, they removed-
[03:26:42.080 --> 03:26:43.440]  Let's say that the-
[03:26:43.440 --> 03:26:48.880]  They removed her from the meeting so that she couldn't address this to the meeting.
[03:26:49.440 --> 03:26:53.680]  That would get to obstruction. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[03:26:53.680 --> 03:26:55.920]  rule of law radio, we'll be right back.
[03:26:56.160 --> 03:27:02.080]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid,
[03:27:02.080 --> 03:27:07.680]  the hackers will come, and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[03:27:07.680 --> 03:27:10.080]  back with the shocking details in a moment.
[03:27:10.560 --> 03:27:16.160]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[03:27:16.160 --> 03:27:20.720]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[03:27:20.720 --> 03:27:24.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[03:27:25.520 --> 03:27:30.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[03:27:30.880 --> 03:27:36.400]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[03:27:36.400 --> 03:27:42.400]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[03:27:44.400 --> 03:27:48.960]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into
[03:27:48.960 --> 03:27:54.080]  your home, too, with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters
[03:27:54.080 --> 03:27:58.560]  to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[03:27:58.560 --> 03:28:03.840]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast. If we make the national power grid
[03:28:03.840 --> 03:28:09.440]  controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could tap in
[03:28:09.440 --> 03:28:15.040]  and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed
[03:28:15.040 --> 03:28:20.640]  smart meters for privacy and health reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[03:28:20.640 --> 03:28:25.760]  There's nothing smart about that. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com,
[03:28:25.760 --> 03:28:27.680]  the world's most private search engine.
[03:28:30.400 --> 03:28:35.840]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[03:28:35.840 --> 03:28:41.360]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[03:28:41.360 --> 03:28:45.600]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[03:28:45.600 --> 03:28:49.840]  But thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[03:28:49.840 --> 03:28:52.240]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer.
[03:28:52.240 --> 03:28:54.800]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[03:28:54.800 --> 03:29:00.240]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[03:29:02.000 --> 03:29:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[03:29:06.000 --> 03:29:09.840]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[03:29:09.840 --> 03:29:13.600]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the
[03:29:13.600 --> 03:29:17.120]  right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[03:29:17.120 --> 03:29:21.680]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[03:29:21.680 --> 03:29:26.080]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's
[03:29:26.080 --> 03:29:30.080]  Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[03:29:30.080 --> 03:29:33.920]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[03:29:33.920 --> 03:29:37.840]  courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[03:29:37.840 --> 03:29:42.400]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's
[03:29:42.400 --> 03:29:47.120]  book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009
[03:29:47.120 --> 03:29:51.360]  seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[03:29:51.360 --> 03:29:55.440]  your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today,
[03:29:55.440 --> 03:29:58.560]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[03:29:58.560 --> 03:30:07.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[03:30:28.960 --> 03:30:32.000]  Do the master capability
[03:30:35.520 --> 03:30:40.960]  they come from natural divinity with steadfast roots and authenticity
[03:30:41.920 --> 03:30:47.120]  I see tools to regain dignity and rebuild the credibility
[03:30:48.240 --> 03:30:58.640]  and I say truth in nature must be justice I believe truth in nature must be justice
[03:31:00.880 --> 03:31:08.240]  and though it's a daunting task at least I got the piece of seed I said more to just take off
[03:31:08.240 --> 03:31:14.800]  the silly mask and in the light of day we all will buy some tools of ingenuity
[03:31:15.920 --> 03:31:23.280]  to use against the workers of iniquity tools of ingenuity to use against the workers of
[03:31:23.280 --> 03:31:30.960]  iniquity okay we are back randy calton brett fountain rule of law radio and we're a little
[03:31:30.960 --> 03:31:35.760]  late coming in because we were having a vigorous discussion on the break
[03:31:35.840 --> 03:31:41.920]  and we formulated a plan we have this telegram channel it's got about 1,500 people on it and
[03:31:41.920 --> 03:31:51.760]  it's on telegram that does not lend itself to censoring so they can't get at us
[03:31:53.200 --> 03:31:59.200]  I'm looking at this video and I've personally observed
[03:31:59.520 --> 03:32:05.440]  at least one police officer maybe three it seems like I saw three in this video
[03:32:07.040 --> 03:32:15.040]  three policemen who were present yeah that's what I saw too three of them so I saw one committing
[03:32:15.040 --> 03:32:26.000]  crimes two of them standing there in visible support of the criminal so I have reason to
[03:32:26.240 --> 03:32:34.000]  believe and do believe that this police officer or this person dressed up like a police officer
[03:32:35.360 --> 03:32:40.960]  committed a criminal act and that these other two people dressed up as police officers
[03:32:40.960 --> 03:32:47.360]  acted in concert and collusion with the person committing the criminal act I have a duty
[03:32:47.520 --> 03:32:53.920]  with the person committing the criminal act I have a duty to give notice of that crime
[03:32:54.880 --> 03:33:05.520]  to some magistrate what happens if we start looking at videos and observing police officers
[03:33:05.520 --> 03:33:17.040]  committing criminal acts in Ohio California Texas anywhere and as citizens in a republic
[03:33:18.000 --> 03:33:27.840]  start giving magistrates notice that we have reason to believe and do believe that these people
[03:33:27.840 --> 03:33:31.520]  committed these crimes even though I don't know their names I don't need to know their names
[03:33:32.720 --> 03:33:43.040]  unknown officer in a video taken at the lakeway school board meeting
[03:33:43.040 --> 03:33:48.960]  I don't need to know their names I can file criminal charges against the office
[03:33:48.960 --> 03:33:51.360]  the officer Baldy and officer one and two
[03:33:53.920 --> 03:34:01.120]  and their names would be determined in discovery what's going to happen is if I file this
[03:34:01.680 --> 03:34:07.200]  with some magistrate the magistrate is going to take that complaint and throw it in the trash
[03:34:07.920 --> 03:34:15.280]  well what magistrate should we file it with Brett I'm thinking justice Hedge
[03:34:19.040 --> 03:34:25.280]  you just want to go back at him yes I do he would recognize both of our names as having
[03:34:25.280 --> 03:34:35.920]  done that before yes and then sue judge Hedge in the justice of the peace court 20 grand
[03:34:37.200 --> 03:34:48.160]  oh that will jerk a knot in his shorts when he doesn't issue a warrant so if I'm in Wise County
[03:34:48.160 --> 03:34:57.360]  Texas and I'm planning to sue my local there the judge in the next town over in Rome Texas
[03:34:57.360 --> 03:35:04.480]  where I had a couple of speeding tickets they gave me a speeding ticket for speeding
[03:35:05.040 --> 03:35:15.440]  in order to get to the Boyd city court so as not to be late on my ticket for speeding
[03:35:17.360 --> 03:35:18.560]  what's the deal with that
[03:35:20.960 --> 03:35:26.160]  the cops give me the ticket and I'm laughing and said man I'm going to be late for my hearing on
[03:35:26.160 --> 03:35:29.520]  my last speeding ticket and the car gets tickled
[03:35:34.320 --> 03:35:43.280]  I'm going to sue this judge in the justice of the peace court in his private capacity for 20 grand
[03:35:45.680 --> 03:35:50.080]  I don't make him crazy and he's going to get the city attorney to represent him
[03:35:50.080 --> 03:35:58.720]  and then I'm going to file a motion to strike his response and just to I'm going to object to the
[03:35:58.720 --> 03:36:09.040]  office the lawyer as having no standing and then move for sanctions against them and charged them
[03:36:09.040 --> 03:36:15.360]  both with misappropriation of public funds the point of what we're doing here we can take the
[03:36:15.360 --> 03:36:24.880]  system back and this may be an easy way to do it these guys are in lakeway texas what happens
[03:36:24.880 --> 03:36:33.360]  if they get a criminal complaint from somebody in utah who saw this video on the internet
[03:36:34.320 --> 03:36:42.560]  and based on this video has reason to believe and does believe that these people committed these
[03:36:42.560 --> 03:36:53.840]  crimes and then when the magistrate to whom they send the complaint does not issue a warrant or
[03:36:53.840 --> 03:37:00.320]  doesn't return their cover letter in the included stamp self-addressed envelope
[03:37:01.520 --> 03:37:09.040]  which will give them reason to believe that the magistrate did not issue a warrant
[03:37:09.040 --> 03:37:19.680]  and then this will I'll set this up on my my traffic ticket site it'll automatically spit out
[03:37:19.680 --> 03:37:25.680]  a complaint against the magistrate and we send that one to the chief justice
[03:37:28.640 --> 03:37:35.760]  I've already sued the chief justice of the texas supreme for not issuing a warrant against the
[03:37:35.840 --> 03:37:42.640]  governor for 20 million and the fifth circuit threw it out so i'm going to file criminal charges
[03:37:42.640 --> 03:37:48.560]  against the fifth circuit with a special agent in charge of the local fbi with all the fifth
[03:37:48.560 --> 03:38:01.120]  circuit judges then so that one's still working so we file against these officers with a magistrate
[03:38:01.200 --> 03:38:07.760]  in travis county and when the magistrate does not issue a warrant then we file a criminal
[03:38:07.760 --> 03:38:11.360]  complaint against the magistrate with the chief with chief justice hedge
[03:38:13.440 --> 03:38:21.280]  and say well bubba what are you going to do now are you going to throw this local magistrate
[03:38:21.280 --> 03:38:26.000]  under the bus or are you going to throw yourself under the bus
[03:38:27.920 --> 03:38:35.360]  to a call so what do you think hatch is going to do is he going to risk me suing him and
[03:38:35.360 --> 03:38:44.080]  brett suing him and somebody in pennsylvania utah new york all over the place suing him
[03:38:44.080 --> 03:38:50.720]  is he going to throw that local product jp under the bus
[03:38:54.160 --> 03:38:55.840]  at the end of the day it's all politics
[03:38:58.480 --> 03:39:04.560]  what do you think brett i think we can pull that off i think it'll be a beautiful thing i think
[03:39:04.560 --> 03:39:10.240]  it's it's really important for people to do things that help other people
[03:39:10.400 --> 03:39:16.400]  and they only freak out when something happens to them and then if they would just help some other
[03:39:16.400 --> 03:39:22.240]  people it would really help prepare them for when it's their turn something happens to them they
[03:39:22.240 --> 03:39:29.120]  wouldn't feel so freaked out and there's nothing worse than a third-party ringer
[03:39:31.680 --> 03:39:36.480]  when when that arrested brett down in wood county and i come down there and they're looking at me
[03:39:37.120 --> 03:39:39.600]  and i come down there and they're looking at me who is this guy
[03:39:41.200 --> 03:39:47.760]  i got no claims on this guy at all and he's down here stomping all over us
[03:39:48.960 --> 03:39:56.320]  and my interaction with the sheriff's deputy was pretty intense to the point that brett couldn't
[03:39:56.320 --> 03:40:05.920]  play it publicly i got pretty ugly with this sheriff's deputy i mean i crawled right down
[03:40:05.920 --> 03:40:15.200]  his throat knowing there was nothing he could do and he knew there was nothing he could do because
[03:40:15.200 --> 03:40:21.680]  he's dealing with a third-party interloper there ain't nothing worse than a third party
[03:40:23.200 --> 03:40:29.520]  he got no way of handling us and i need to thank brett for that i don't think i ever did
[03:40:30.480 --> 03:40:37.600]  brett you gave me such incredible entertainment oh god that was fun
[03:40:39.600 --> 03:40:43.200]  yeah but it's really helpful if people will do something to help other people
[03:40:44.000 --> 03:40:50.480]  like even just go be a court watcher or go sit in on somebody else's issues it really helps
[03:40:50.480 --> 03:40:57.680]  not only to help that person but it helps the one who's who's participating hang on we'll be right
[03:40:57.840 --> 03:41:04.400]  back do you have a business with five employees or more how would you like to save hundreds of
[03:41:04.400 --> 03:41:09.920]  thousands of dollars in fika taxes do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be
[03:41:09.920 --> 03:41:16.560]  on or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the
[03:41:16.560 --> 03:41:24.320]  claims cost the champ plan is a section 125 irs approved preventative health plan that provides
[03:41:24.320 --> 03:41:31.920]  your employees with doctors medications emergency care and teladoc all at zero cost with zero
[03:41:31.920 --> 03:41:39.040]  co-pay if you are an employee you also will get a pay raise by paying less than fika taxes as an
[03:41:39.040 --> 03:41:45.520]  employer you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching fika taxes the champ plan
[03:41:45.520 --> 03:41:52.160]  can help add working capital market resale value or pay down lines of credit call scott
[03:41:52.160 --> 03:41:59.040]  at two one four seven three zero two four seven one or dallas mms.com
[03:42:02.640 --> 03:42:07.520]  are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney
[03:42:07.520 --> 03:42:13.200]  with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand four cd course that will show
[03:42:13.200 --> 03:42:20.720]  you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing
[03:42:20.720 --> 03:42:26.320]  if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step
[03:42:26.320 --> 03:42:33.840]  by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[03:42:33.840 --> 03:42:39.840]  of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should
[03:42:39.840 --> 03:42:45.520]  understand about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive
[03:42:45.520 --> 03:42:53.840]  our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and much more
[03:42:53.840 --> 03:43:03.280]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866 law easy