ROL_2023-09-15_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.640] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.640 --> 00:09.320] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.320 --> 00:10.800] Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.800 --> 00:14.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.720 --> 00:16.840] your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.840 --> 00:18.420] Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.420 --> 00:22.040] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.040 --> 00:26.800] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.800 --> 00:31.960] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.960 --> 00:34.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.560 --> 00:38.840] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:38.840 --> 00:42.400] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.400 --> 00:44.720] Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.720 --> 00:47.680] Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.680 --> 00:50.720] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.720 --> 00:54.360] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.360 --> 01:01.440] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.440 --> 01:02.800] and R for religion.
[01:02.800 --> 01:06.880] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.880 --> 01:08.400] assembly, and religion.
[01:08.400 --> 01:10.760] But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.760 --> 01:14.480] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.480 --> 01:18.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.680] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.680 --> 01:30.960] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:30.960 --> 01:34.600] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.600 --> 01:38.040] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.040 --> 01:39.560] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.560 --> 01:43.440] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.440 --> 01:46.580] one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.580 --> 01:48.160] Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.160 --> 01:51.760] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.760 --> 01:56.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.560 --> 02:01.680] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.680 --> 02:04.320] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.320 --> 02:08.600] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.600 --> 02:12.140] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.140 --> 02:15.720] Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.720 --> 02:20.080] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.080 --> 02:22.120] of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.120 --> 02:26.640] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.640 --> 02:30.480] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.480 --> 02:31.480] Get it?
[02:31.480 --> 02:32.480] Two arms?
[02:32.480 --> 02:33.480] Bear hug?
[02:33.480 --> 02:34.480] Bear arms?
[02:34.480 --> 02:37.400] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.400 --> 02:38.400] when he said,
[02:38.400 --> 02:43.560] "...the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.560 --> 02:48.640] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically
[02:48.640 --> 02:50.920] has proved to always be possible."
[02:50.920 --> 02:52.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.280 --> 03:16.040] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:23.280 --> 03:51.440] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[03:51.440 --> 04:07.080] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[04:07.080 --> 04:34.320] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now
[04:34.320 --> 05:01.560] appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now
[05:01.560 --> 05:18.000] appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote
[05:18.000 --> 05:32.200] in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America,
[05:32.200 --> 05:49.040] but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which
[05:49.040 --> 05:59.200] I can kind of understand why they think that. I used to have the perspective that City Hall,
[05:59.200 --> 06:11.560] just a simple way to say all of the officials, a big cloud of them, and it seems they're so
[06:11.560 --> 06:19.640] formidable. They do all these things and they control everybody and it's so powerful seeming.
[06:19.640 --> 06:28.320] So I understand how they could think that. Yeah, and that's what this show is about where we try
[06:28.320 --> 06:39.120] to break that perspective down. And one of the things that concerns me about that is demonizing
[06:39.120 --> 06:46.600] these public officials. That's problematic. Not because I don't think that public officials are
[06:46.600 --> 06:55.640] demons. It's because it's a really bad way to think about it. And like Brett knows, I'm not
[06:55.640 --> 07:05.920] particularly religious, but the Bible is a book of cultural wisdom. And it says, Judge not that ye
[07:05.920 --> 07:17.240] be not judged. That's cultural wisdom. Not because God ordered you not to do that. That's not the
[07:17.240 --> 07:26.160] reason. The reason he ordered you not to do that is because it's a really bad idea. It doesn't work
[07:26.160 --> 07:36.240] well. If you decide that someone else is evil, you give them power. And if they're evil, well,
[07:36.240 --> 07:45.720] you know, what can I do? Just poor little old me. No, no, no, no. Our public officials are not evil.
[07:45.720 --> 07:54.760] Okay, there's an occasional squirrel in there that shouldn't have got in the cage, but it happens
[07:54.760 --> 08:03.960] sometimes. People who should not be in this kind of business sometimes gravitate toward it. And we
[08:03.960 --> 08:12.280] have to weed those out. The rest of them are otherwise well-meaning officials. They just
[08:12.280 --> 08:23.360] haven't been properly trained. And we are in a republic. When Benjamin Franklin on coming out
[08:23.360 --> 08:29.760] of the Continental Congress, a woman asked him, Mr. Franklin, what have you given us? And he said,
[08:29.760 --> 08:40.280] a republic, if you can keep it. And it took me a while to understand that when he said you,
[08:40.280 --> 08:50.840] he wasn't speaking to an all-inclusive you, the people. He was talking to you, the madam,
[08:50.840 --> 09:02.240] the woman that asked him the question. You are the citizen in the republic. Not all these people
[09:02.240 --> 09:07.800] behind you and your neighbors and their neighbors and the next town over, but you personally,
[09:07.800 --> 09:18.320] you are the one who has to keep it or it won't be kept. And that's how it is in a republic.
[09:18.320 --> 09:27.120] And we have one of those. And if you think that you can't fight City Hall, it's only because you
[09:27.120 --> 09:34.600] hadn't figured out how to do it yet. And that's what this show is all about. This is how you do
[09:34.600 --> 09:43.920] it by the numbers. I live in a small town and I intend to sue the county that I live in. But
[09:43.920 --> 09:53.600] when I sue the county, I want it right. So I'm going to set them up. I'm going to play them like
[09:53.600 --> 10:02.920] a cheap fiddle. And I expect with the latest filings I have made in this lawsuit that I filed,
[10:02.920 --> 10:12.200] that they're listening to me. They should be listening to me. Guys, I played you like a cheap
[10:12.200 --> 10:20.440] fiddle. How does it feel? I went in there and asked you to do something that the law absolutely
[10:20.440 --> 10:28.440] commanded you to do. Chief Justice of Texas Supreme Court, Highest Magistrate in the State
[10:28.440 --> 10:42.000] of Texas, Article 2.09. Who are magistrates? That's the title. First one, Justices of the Supreme Court.
[10:42.000 --> 10:50.280] Well, I filed a criminal complaint against the governor. And since he was the highest
[10:50.280 --> 10:55.720] executive officer in the state, it seemed appropriate that I filed my criminal complaint
[10:55.720 --> 11:04.560] with the highest level magistrate in the state, which was the chief justice. And he was commanded
[11:04.560 --> 11:16.680] under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 15.09 to issue a warrant forthwith. Texas does not say
[11:16.680 --> 11:21.920] like New York does. The magistrate shall examine into the sufficiency of the allegation. And if
[11:21.920 --> 11:27.480] the magistrate finds probable cause, the magistrate shall issue a warrant. Texas doesn't say that.
[11:27.480 --> 11:36.480] It says the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith. Period. With the proviso that when
[11:36.480 --> 11:43.640] the person is arrested, he is taken back to this magistrate. If any of you have ever read a warrant,
[11:43.640 --> 11:55.840] it always says arrest this person and bring him before me. That's because I issued this warrant
[11:55.840 --> 12:06.440] based on an ex parte hearing where I got information from one person, the accuser. Now,
[12:06.440 --> 12:13.720] arrest that person and bring him back before me so I can give that person an opportunity to make
[12:13.720 --> 12:20.240] a statement before any evidence is entered against the person. I am to give them an opportunity to
[12:20.240 --> 12:31.320] make a statement. So I hear both sides. And then I determine if there's probable cause. That's how
[12:31.320 --> 12:38.480] it's supposed to be done. So that's what I asked the chief justice to do. Well, you know, Randy,
[12:38.480 --> 12:46.440] that's kind of not fair. You went to them and you knew that they're accustomed to just denying
[12:46.440 --> 12:54.120] whatever people ask. They've got their ways of doing things. And you went to them knowing that
[12:54.120 --> 13:01.920] they tend to just blow off whatever anybody asks them to do. Yeah, that kind of wasn't very fair.
[13:01.920 --> 13:09.080] I know. You asked them to do something that the law commands them to do. Even though I knew they
[13:09.080 --> 13:19.360] wouldn't do it. Right. Is that great or what? And they are so dependable. I played him like a cheap
[13:19.360 --> 13:28.440] fiddle. Judge Hedge, how does that feel? You walked right into it. And then when you didn't
[13:28.440 --> 13:37.840] issue a warrant, I created a criminal complaint against you, accusing you of refusing to issue a
[13:37.840 --> 13:44.280] warrant when you received a criminal complaint. And I sent that to the presiding judge of the
[13:44.280 --> 13:54.560] Court of Criminal Appeals, Sharon Keller. Sharon Keller got that complaint and did nothing. So
[13:54.560 --> 14:04.000] Sharon, how's it feel to be played like a cheap fiddle? I walked right through them. Everybody was
[14:04.000 --> 14:11.200] so accommodating. Oh, it was wonderful. I'm in the county I live in. I'm driving into town. And
[14:11.200 --> 14:18.400] traffic backed up about a half a mile. And right in front of me is a sheriff's deputy car. Well,
[14:18.400 --> 14:24.960] traffic backs up. It's hot. He decides, I guess he didn't want to sit there in traffic. He pulls
[14:24.960 --> 14:29.200] over on the shoulder and he scoots down the shoulder, just took off spun gravel when he took
[14:29.200 --> 14:36.720] off zoom down the shoulders gone. Traffic moves up one light. And I stopped again. And I'm right in
[14:36.720 --> 14:43.200] front of City Hall. And there's a sheriff's deputy. I sat there and looked at him a little bit. And
[14:43.200 --> 14:50.360] finally, it just irked me. And I thought, you know, I want to set up a suit against Wise County for
[14:50.360 --> 15:02.600] my next next suit. So this would be a really good way to play them. How much more nitpicking a
[15:02.600 --> 15:11.200] complaint can I start with than this? So I pulled in there, go up to the sheriff's car and he rolls
[15:11.200 --> 15:16.440] down the window and ask him for his name. And he said, Why? Why need your name? Well, I'm not
[15:16.440 --> 15:21.720] going to give it to you. I said, Are you a sheriff's deputy? He said, Yes, I am. Then policy
[15:21.720 --> 15:26.880] requires you to identify yourself. Well, I want to know why you want to know my name. Well, you
[15:26.880 --> 15:32.360] pulled over and drove down the shoulder to avoid traffic. And I want to see if I can get you
[15:32.360 --> 15:41.120] arrested. Well, I'm not going to give you my name. Okay. I had to ask, you had to refuse. So I went
[15:41.120 --> 15:46.960] inside the city hall and asked for some policemen. I come back out. And now the sheriff's deputy is
[15:46.960 --> 15:52.220] wanting to grill me. And I told him, Shut up. And he asked me, Well, why are you doing this? Get
[15:52.220 --> 15:59.360] lost. So I'm goading him. And he's getting more and more angry. And then these two sheriffs, these
[15:59.360 --> 16:09.440] two police officers come out. Let's see, it was gross. And I forget the other guy's name. Anyway,
[16:09.440 --> 16:13.520] they said, What can I do for you? I need you to arrest him. But first, I need you to tell me who
[16:13.520 --> 16:21.080] he is. But I said, Why would I arrest him? We drove down the shoulder. And the officer said, Are
[16:21.080 --> 16:30.560] you saying that he drove down an improved shoulder? Yes, I'm saying he drove down an improved
[16:30.560 --> 16:39.960] shoulder to avoid traffic. Arrest him. And the sheriff's deputy made some kind of joke. I didn't
[16:39.960 --> 16:45.880] hear it. But they all thought it was funny. They all started laughing. And I'm thinking, Oh, man,
[16:45.880 --> 16:54.680] how is this going to look in front of a jury? You guys are such putzes. Hang on, Randy Kelton,
[16:54.680 --> 17:00.880] Brett Fountain, Really Love Radio. We'll be back shortly talking about putzes. Are you being
[17:00.880 --> 17:06.240] harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors
[17:06.240 --> 17:12.000] now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against
[17:12.000 --> 17:17.200] debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step by step instructions in plain English
[17:17.200 --> 17:22.600] on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phone,
[17:22.600 --> 17:27.880] mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of
[17:27.880 --> 17:33.400] your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.400 --> 17:38.960] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[17:38.960 --> 17:44.160] consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[17:44.160 --> 17:49.520] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's
[17:49.520 --> 17:59.480] ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[17:59.480 --> 18:05.640] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[18:05.640 --> 18:09.160] we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[18:09.160 --> 18:13.520] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[18:13.520 --> 18:17.520] travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly,
[18:17.520 --> 18:22.160] the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[18:22.160 --> 18:26.640] how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig,
[18:26.640 --> 18:30.240] in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[18:30.240 --> 18:34.240] available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule
[18:34.240 --> 18:38.960] of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:38.960 --> 18:43.280] ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[18:43.280 --> 18:48.080] Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.080 --> 18:51.760] documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[18:51.760 --> 18:56.320] of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the
[18:56.320 --> 19:05.040] free society we all want and deserve. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[19:05.040 --> 19:13.040] LogosradioNetwork.com.
[19:35.040 --> 20:00.640] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking about putzes.
[20:00.640 --> 20:11.760] These guys were so predictable and that's what you'll find out. Most people who don't have much
[20:11.760 --> 20:21.200] to do with the policing and police departments, they get stopped and everything is new to them
[20:21.200 --> 20:26.960] and everything is strange and it's stuff that normal people don't deal with very often.
[20:26.960 --> 20:35.280] Once you begin to look at it, it will become clear these policemen do exactly the same thing
[20:36.080 --> 20:48.160] over and over and over. Nobody ever interrupts them. They think they are absolutely immune
[20:48.160 --> 20:57.280] from any negative consequence because policemen especially, their whole job is about confrontation.
[20:57.280 --> 21:04.880] So, they are comfortable confronting citizens. Yeah, dominating. Yeah, that makes them putzes.
[21:06.640 --> 21:14.800] They are so easy to manipulate. So, I asked them to take my complaint against the officer and they
[21:14.800 --> 21:24.480] refused. So, I said, okay, I had to ask, you had to refuse, I'll be in touch. So, I went home,
[21:24.480 --> 21:30.560] I made up four criminal complaints, two for official oppression, two for shielding from
[21:30.560 --> 21:35.680] prosecution. Those two were felonies and I filed them with their chief of police.
[21:35.680 --> 21:44.560] And knowing how chief of police are, I contacted my mayor. I live in a small town and I've known
[21:44.560 --> 21:51.520] the mayor for 30 years and I didn't want to have this fight in the town I live in. I wanted to
[21:51.520 --> 22:00.160] have the fight with the sheriff's department because the sheriff hates me. I hammered him
[22:00.160 --> 22:05.680] when he was a Texas ranger and then I hammered him when he's a sheriff. He really does not like
[22:05.680 --> 22:10.240] me. So, I wanted to have the fight with the sheriff's department. So, I told the mayor,
[22:10.240 --> 22:19.200] I violated one of my rules. If you listen to this show a lot, you've heard me say, never give fair
[22:19.200 --> 22:27.440] warning. But I didn't want to sue the city I live in. So, I called the mayor and I told him that
[22:27.440 --> 22:36.560] what had occurred and I filed four criminal charges with your chief of police. And I want
[22:36.560 --> 22:43.040] you to make absolutely sure that the chief of police does precisely what the Texas Code of
[22:43.040 --> 22:49.040] Criminal Procedure commands him to do. And he said, what's that? Take my complaints and give them to
[22:49.040 --> 23:00.000] some magistrate. And I explained to him that I was getting prepared to sue the county. I've already
[23:00.000 --> 23:09.600] sued all the highest judges in Texas for $485 million, but that suit was just for practice.
[23:10.800 --> 23:17.360] I want to see how they respond so that I can better craft this particular suit.
[23:17.360 --> 23:26.160] But in filing this next suit, I did not want to sue the city. So, instruct your chief of police
[23:26.160 --> 23:32.800] to do exactly what the code says and we won't have any problem. And he said, okay, he would talk to
[23:32.800 --> 23:41.040] the chief. And I did this in an email. Then a couple days later, I called the chief and asked
[23:41.040 --> 23:46.160] him what he did with my complaints. He said he gave them to the prosecuting attorney and he said,
[23:46.160 --> 23:56.480] prosecuting attorney and the prosecutor refused to accept them. Okay. Did you give them to some
[23:56.480 --> 24:06.640] magistrate? He said, there's nothing else I can do. Okay. And about a week later, I get a motion
[24:06.640 --> 24:18.320] in this $485 million case. And this is from the chief justice of the Texas Supreme. This is the
[24:18.320 --> 24:30.160] highest level, essentially or supposedly the smartest lawyer in Texas. And he filed this motion
[24:31.680 --> 24:36.080] telling the court what a jerk I was. I used a different term last night and Brett said,
[24:36.080 --> 24:43.680] I can't say that on the air. Anus rectum. He essentially told the judge I was an anus rectum.
[24:44.800 --> 24:52.640] And that I filed this suit only for practice, therefore it was frivolous and moved the court
[24:52.640 --> 25:03.440] to dismiss the case. Not one statute, not one piece of case law. He just essentially told the
[25:03.440 --> 25:13.920] court I was an anus rectum. Is that insane? You would think that somebody wants to make a motion.
[25:16.160 --> 25:23.120] Somebody at that level would know how facts bring the law. If somebody filed a motion in a case
[25:24.000 --> 25:28.960] and it went to the Texas Supreme and the Supreme saw a motion like that,
[25:28.960 --> 25:35.600] they would throw it in the trash. But he filed that motion.
[25:38.080 --> 25:44.880] Point of trying to make us the chumps. The guys at the bottom are chumps.
[25:46.800 --> 25:53.680] I went to Victoria County with four criminal complaints and talked to Judge Robert Whitaker.
[25:53.680 --> 26:01.040] He said, can I help you? I said, yes. I have some criminal complaints for you.
[26:01.040 --> 26:03.280] I gave them to him and he said, what do you want me to do with these?
[26:03.920 --> 26:08.320] I want you to do exactly what 15.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure commands you to do and issue
[26:08.320 --> 26:14.800] four wants. He said, are you an attorney? Oh, no, no, no. I sleep well at night and keep
[26:14.800 --> 26:20.240] man's own pockets. Thank you very much. He said, have you talked to an attorney?
[26:20.240 --> 26:24.080] No, no, no. I don't waste my time with those shysters. They don't know squat.
[26:24.960 --> 26:29.440] He said, well, if you're not an attorney, I'm not even going to read this. Threw him down, stormed
[26:29.440 --> 26:38.640] out. I watched him leave and these clerks are over there kind of cringing. I'm still staring
[26:38.640 --> 26:45.280] at the door and I said, well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you. I took out my cell
[26:45.280 --> 26:57.360] phone and dialed 9-1-1. The next time I saw the judge, he slinked into the courtroom at a hearing
[26:58.560 --> 27:05.520] on the civil suit I had filed against him. He was not near so arrogant.
[27:05.520 --> 27:15.040] And it was great fun. He got to sit there and watch me order the bailiff to arrest the county
[27:15.040 --> 27:28.560] judge sitting in this case, ordering the bailiff to arrest him. Oh, that was guys, girls, if you
[27:28.560 --> 27:36.800] have never stood in a courtroom and demanded that the bailiff arrest the judge, you just haven't
[27:36.800 --> 27:48.000] lived. That was the eighth time I have done that. I left that courtroom and went to a district court
[27:49.200 --> 27:55.600] and gave 14 criminal complaints to the bailiff while this judge is, they're having a trial and
[27:55.600 --> 28:01.600] they've got a whole bunch of lawyers in there and the judge had a recess. I went over to the bailiff
[28:01.600 --> 28:05.600] and I said, Mr. Bailiff, my name is Randall Kelton. Instruct the judge that I have business with the
[28:05.600 --> 28:10.560] court. May I tell him the nature of the business? Yes, you may. Give him these. I handed him these
[28:10.560 --> 28:15.120] 14 criminal complaints. He gives them to the judge and the judge looks at them. He looks up at me,
[28:15.120 --> 28:21.840] are you Randall Kelton? Yes, I am. Order these. Those are verified criminal affidavits complete
[28:21.840 --> 28:27.360] in accordance with 15.05 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Well, what do you want me to do with
[28:27.360 --> 28:35.840] them? I want you to do exactly what Article 15.09 commands you to do with them and issuance. He said,
[28:35.840 --> 28:46.240] denied. I said, Mr. Bailiff, did you hear that? Yes, Mr. Kelton, I did. Arrest that judge.
[28:46.240 --> 28:52.400] Now, I went to this district judge because I'd been in his courtroom before and he was really
[28:52.400 --> 29:00.400] an arrogant jerk. I'm ordering the bailiff to arrest him in front of a whole bunch of lawyers
[29:00.400 --> 29:11.600] and such. That arrogant, smart-mouthed judge, Garcia Garza was his name. He stood there and kept
[29:11.600 --> 29:19.120] his mouth shut while I'm arguing with the bailiff. Mr. Bailiff, I need you to take your chicken suit
[29:19.120 --> 29:34.000] off. That was so much fun. Guys, you can handle these people. It seems like that's what they do,
[29:34.000 --> 29:42.480] right? They just be quiet. He knew one word out of him, witness tampering, obstruction.
[29:43.360 --> 29:50.000] And he knew because I was doing that, that I knew that. Every time I've done that to a judge,
[29:50.000 --> 29:55.840] he sat there and kept his mouth shut. They know the law. They're just used to not following it.
[29:56.960 --> 29:59.200] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Wrecked Fountain.
[29:59.200 --> 30:05.280] We were wrong. It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work,
[30:05.280 --> 30:09.360] but have they negatively affected our health? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in
[30:09.360 --> 30:14.400] just a moment with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.200 --> 30:20.720] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.720 --> 30:25.520] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.520 --> 30:30.800] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.800 --> 30:35.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[30:35.440 --> 30:42.480] startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Start
[30:42.480 --> 30:49.280] Page. Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. It's a fact. But whether it's dangerous to have
[30:49.280 --> 30:53.760] a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed. Some have blamed it for
[30:53.760 --> 30:58.400] brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. Well, now the Journal of
[30:58.400 --> 31:03.040] the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry.
[31:03.040 --> 31:08.160] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:08.160 --> 31:12.800] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. While researchers aren't sure
[31:12.800 --> 31:17.760] whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any chances. I always keep the phone
[31:17.760 --> 31:22.720] far from my body and I use a corded headset. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and
[31:22.720 --> 31:24.880] information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.720 --> 32:06.800] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[32:06.800 --> 32:12.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for
[32:12.000 --> 32:17.760] Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:17.760 --> 32:22.320] Study to show thy self-approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
[32:22.320 --> 32:27.520] rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the
[32:27.520 --> 32:32.960] Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour
[32:32.960 --> 32:37.600] topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian
[32:37.600 --> 32:42.560] character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a
[32:42.560 --> 32:48.160] hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:48.160 --> 32:53.760] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[32:53.760 --> 32:59.360] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[32:59.360 --> 33:12.960] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:29.360 --> 33:49.280] and we're talking about you can't take these guys on and it's not as hard as you think,
[33:50.160 --> 33:56.720] but don't wait till they pick a fight with you. You want to pick the fight with them.
[33:56.720 --> 34:04.640] It is so much different. You won't believe it. A pick to fight with all the highest judges in Texas
[34:05.680 --> 34:15.440] and the directors of about six or seven government agencies. Suit them all in their personal capacity.
[34:17.120 --> 34:25.040] And this is so much fun. A suit them in the federal court, state actors in the federal court
[34:25.040 --> 34:33.360] in their personal capacity. When that happens, the state is forbidden to immunize them so they
[34:33.360 --> 34:43.840] have no immunity. And so I filed a suit and they got the attorney general to file a Rule 12B motion
[34:43.840 --> 34:54.960] to dismiss failure of state of claim. In their motion, there's generally there are 12B1 and 12B6.
[34:54.960 --> 35:03.200] 12B1 goes to subject matter jurisdiction and they said that the court didn't have subject matter
[35:03.200 --> 35:15.440] jurisdiction because these guys had immunity. What? No, you don't. The feds have been very
[35:15.440 --> 35:25.040] specific in that, that when a public official, state official is sued in their individual capacity
[35:26.400 --> 35:31.440] in the federal court for violating a federal law or a constitutional provision,
[35:31.440 --> 35:39.040] a federal constitutional provision, the state cannot provide them with immunity as it would
[35:39.040 --> 35:51.280] violate the supremacy clause. And they argued that they had immunity. And then they said that
[35:51.280 --> 36:02.240] my claim, that I failed to make a claim of which recovery could be had. And I accused them of
[36:02.240 --> 36:10.720] engaging in an ongoing criminal conspiracy. They were ordered to train public officials
[36:12.240 --> 36:17.680] in criminal justice system. And I maintained that they conspired one with the other,
[36:17.680 --> 36:24.160] not to train public officials in the due course of the laws, but train them in a set of practices
[36:24.160 --> 36:32.880] and procedures that mounted to an ongoing criminal enterprise. Okay, so I filed that.
[36:32.880 --> 36:42.400] And they said, 150 page presentment, very detailed. And they said, failed to state a claim
[36:42.400 --> 36:49.120] of which recovery could be had. And they essentially based that claim on their immunity.
[36:50.400 --> 37:00.080] But they don't have any immunity. So I filed a response to it. And Brett and I, we talk about the
[37:01.040 --> 37:06.320] standards of their canons of what's it called? The bar associates.
[37:06.320 --> 37:07.760] Code of Judicial Conducts?
[37:07.760 --> 37:08.640] No, I'm thinking the-
[37:08.640 --> 37:09.920] Rules of Professional Conduct.
[37:09.920 --> 37:21.280] Rules of Professional Conduct. 3.3A2. 3.3 is failure to speak with candor to the court.
[37:23.200 --> 37:32.720] And under 3.3A2, if there is case law contrary to their position,
[37:32.720 --> 37:42.960] and it has not been addressed by the opposing side, the lawyer is required to reveal it to the court.
[37:44.720 --> 37:53.440] Well, they didn't mention the Young Doctrine. And the Young Doctrine is the one that said that
[37:53.440 --> 38:02.960] the state cannot immunize a state official when sued in the Fed for violating federal law.
[38:02.960 --> 38:07.680] Well, but this Young Doctrine, Randy, isn't that something that's just this little obscure,
[38:07.680 --> 38:12.000] well, a little known thing that never gets cited and kind of forgot about it?
[38:12.000 --> 38:18.080] Yeah, okay. I looked it up in case text. And in case text, I like that one, because
[38:18.080 --> 38:23.360] off to the right side, there's a header there that says, Citation. So I clicked on that.
[38:25.200 --> 38:32.800] I got 10,000. We've got a guy on our telegram channel who keeps quoting very old law.
[38:33.760 --> 38:42.080] And I chewed him out once for quoting the 1890 law. Well, the Young Doctrine is from the 1890s.
[38:43.040 --> 38:44.080] Yeah, 1908.
[38:44.080 --> 38:52.160] Yeah, 1908. Oh, it's 1908. I thought he's older. Okay. But it's still over 100 years old.
[38:53.280 --> 39:01.520] And essentially, what the statistics say is all of the law turns over every 25 years.
[39:04.240 --> 39:10.960] So you need to cite law that's 25 years old or less in order for it to be good law,
[39:10.960 --> 39:15.600] unless it's a seminal case. And the way you find out it's a seminal case,
[39:15.600 --> 39:23.200] you see how many times it's been cited. Brady has probably been cited 100,000 times.
[39:24.560 --> 39:33.760] So I clicked on this one is 10,000 times. So then it gives you a list of cases that have cited
[39:33.760 --> 39:42.720] Young and it shows you where Young is cited in the case. So you can look at that and read
[39:43.280 --> 39:53.200] the context in which it's addressed. And then you find a recent case that addresses the case you want
[39:54.080 --> 40:02.400] that references the case you want. So that brings the old case forward. Well, I found 10,000.
[40:02.400 --> 40:08.720] Well, I found 10,000. And I think that's all that case text will give me anyway.
[40:10.560 --> 40:18.720] And instead of just citing Young, I cited cases that cited Young to bring it forward.
[40:18.720 --> 40:24.240] This is not hard to do. We have a telegram channel where we talk about how to do legal
[40:24.240 --> 40:35.440] research. It's not that difficult. And so they did not reference Young and Young is a seminal case.
[40:36.880 --> 40:43.680] It's the case that established that you can sue state officials in their private capacity and they
[40:43.680 --> 40:52.400] don't have immunity. You would think that the attorney general, the highest level prosecutor
[40:52.400 --> 40:58.880] in the state would know these things. He was just hoping that you wouldn't.
[40:59.600 --> 41:03.760] I think he really didn't know. You think so?
[41:03.760 --> 41:13.760] Yeah. And this is why I say that. When a law firm gets a case where the opposing side is pro se,
[41:14.800 --> 41:20.480] they give it to the youngest lawyer they have because pro se is your piece of cake for
[41:20.480 --> 41:26.960] a trained jurist, doctorate lawyer. They should have no problems with it.
[41:28.480 --> 41:36.000] I think what we got here was a lawyer that probably had connections. Brett and I were
[41:36.000 --> 41:42.720] talking about this the other day that he probably doesn't have a $160,000 to $180,000 student loan
[41:42.720 --> 41:48.960] to pay off. He probably had parents who paid it off for him. And during college, since mom and
[41:48.960 --> 41:54.320] pop was paying for it, he probably thought he was a representative for one of the beer companies.
[41:54.880 --> 42:02.720] And he didn't graduate in the top 10% of his class or high enough that he would get picked
[42:02.720 --> 42:10.480] up by a law firm. So in order to get something done, he's got connections. He gets a connection
[42:10.480 --> 42:18.480] to the attorney general's office. And they get this pro se chomp file, a complaint against all
[42:18.480 --> 42:26.400] the highest judges in Texas. And they think I'm just another wacko nut job, patriot mythologist.
[42:27.120 --> 42:37.120] And they give it to this young lawyer. And I hammered him. I filed a response to the rule 12
[42:37.120 --> 42:51.600] and ridiculed it as totally inept. And I bar grieved the lawyer for not mentioning the young
[42:51.600 --> 43:00.160] doctor. But I didn't just bar grieve the lawyer. On the document that he filed, there were five
[43:00.160 --> 43:11.360] lawyers listed. One of them is the interim attorney general. And then there are four more that appear
[43:11.360 --> 43:22.800] to be the levels of the supervision, the hierarchy of the attorney general's office. So I bar grieved
[43:22.800 --> 43:31.200] them all. Had to look up their bar card numbers. They filed one for Judge Hetch. So I bar grieved
[43:31.200 --> 43:40.640] them all for that. They filed one for Sharon Keller. So I bar grieved them for that. They
[43:40.640 --> 43:45.760] fought for eight of the other eight judges of the court of criminal appeals. I bar grieved them for
[43:45.760 --> 43:56.160] that. I bar grieved them each one of about eight or 10 times. 296 pages. That was so much fun.
[43:56.160 --> 44:04.320] Hang on. Be right back. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[44:04.320 --> 44:09.280] except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[44:09.280 --> 44:15.120] And it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic
[44:15.120 --> 44:21.120] environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated,
[44:21.120 --> 44:27.120] and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets
[44:27.120 --> 44:32.720] many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[44:32.720 --> 44:38.880] Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[44:38.880 --> 44:45.120] and many others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as
[44:45.120 --> 44:50.880] you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to
[44:50.880 --> 44:56.960] join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[44:56.960 --> 45:03.520] and increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.520 --> 45:08.800] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand
[45:08.800 --> 45:16.560] 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what
[45:16.560 --> 45:21.520] your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.400 --> 45:28.720] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[45:28.720 --> 45:35.280] by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[45:35.280 --> 45:40.640] you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[45:40.640 --> 45:47.360] our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[45:47.360 --> 45:55.280] civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner
[45:55.280 --> 46:00.720] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY.
[46:25.280 --> 46:35.840] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and I'm talking about bar
[46:35.840 --> 46:47.040] grieving. I've bar grieved all five of these for each one they filed. It was 296 pages. It was
[46:47.040 --> 46:55.040] six pages per grievance, and I used a spreadsheet, and I put in the information from each document
[46:55.040 --> 47:01.840] they filed, all the list of all the lawyers on the document, and just merged them all out.
[47:03.040 --> 47:10.080] One time, just the system spit them all out, put them in an envelope, cost me 12 bucks,
[47:10.080 --> 47:22.000] and I sent it. When you go after these guys, it's important to know the law because that's
[47:22.000 --> 47:30.640] the rules of the game, but the strategy is not encompassed in the rules. The strategy is
[47:30.640 --> 47:39.120] encompassed in the politics, so you want to look at this from a human perspective, understanding
[47:39.120 --> 47:46.000] that these are human beings involved in this, and see if you can figure out what the politics is.
[47:46.000 --> 47:54.080] So, you just got hired on with the attorney general, and you get a case with all the highest
[47:54.080 --> 48:01.280] judges in Texas. Oh, goody, goody, now they'll all get to know me. I'll be their lawyer.
[48:03.280 --> 48:12.240] You file a pleading, and this jerk, pro se litigant, bar grieves you into oblivion.
[48:12.240 --> 48:20.240] You and all your bosses, I bar grieved all of them, probably 8 or 10 times, I think, maybe 13 times.
[48:24.000 --> 48:29.520] So, what do you think their bosses are saying when they start getting
[48:30.560 --> 48:33.600] notices of bar grievances by the stack?
[48:33.600 --> 48:39.120] I suspect that this new lawyer is going to have some questions to answer.
[48:40.560 --> 48:47.440] Well, I've got a question. When you've got all these bar grievances, you know that they have been
[48:48.400 --> 48:53.920] deemed enough times for the insurance company to do what you know the pattern is,
[48:55.040 --> 48:58.640] but they're still in business. Why is this happening?
[48:58.640 --> 49:04.880] Why is this law firm still in business and hasn't done their re-org and shifted to a new name?
[49:06.000 --> 49:09.840] Are they now without insurance? Is there some way that we can verify that?
[49:09.840 --> 49:13.200] Because they're a corporation. We can't just do a public records request.
[49:13.200 --> 49:19.680] How can we see that they have no insurance? That is a good question, because we have had
[49:19.680 --> 49:27.600] one that sticks out in my mind. It's Russell Mortland. Russell Mortland was in a bankruptcy,
[49:28.400 --> 49:36.640] and halfway through the bankruptcy, this attorney for one of the people objecting to the bankruptcy,
[49:38.800 --> 49:44.160] he resigned. He left, and they got a new lawyer. At the end of the bankruptcy, this
[49:44.160 --> 49:51.520] first lawyer came back and complained to the court that, Mr. Mortland bar-grieved me three times,
[49:52.080 --> 49:57.520] and the next year our law firm couldn't get malpractice insurance. We had to shut down the
[49:58.080 --> 50:04.800] law firm and reopen in a different name. Russell told this, and I said, Russell,
[50:05.600 --> 50:12.720] did you bar-grieve him for that? Because he said, no, I didn't. He said, no, I didn't.
[50:12.720 --> 50:21.040] Because he's not supposed to mention it to anybody. The lawyer can only talk about the grievance to
[50:21.040 --> 50:27.840] the bar. We had others that we bar-grieved them a whole bunch, and they don't go away.
[50:29.600 --> 50:35.200] But what they're probably not telling you is they're having to pay a whole lot more for their
[50:35.200 --> 50:41.600] insurance. They're not going to tell you that.
[50:42.800 --> 50:47.040] So they had to shift to a different insurer, one of those other seven or nine that you were
[50:47.040 --> 50:52.640] talking about? Yeah, either that, or they have to pay a whole lot bigger premium because their
[50:53.760 --> 51:01.600] rating gets downgraded like crazy. Maybe we've got so many lawyers dumped that they had to find a
[51:01.600 --> 51:08.400] different strategy because Brett and I were doing this telegram channel and this show.
[51:09.360 --> 51:13.440] We've got people grieving lawyers into the Stone Age all over the country.
[51:14.240 --> 51:16.960] Yeah, and we've been mail merging for a good while.
[51:21.120 --> 51:29.120] Scott Richardson sent me a stack of bar grievances, responses to bar grievances that he received,
[51:29.120 --> 51:36.000] about five inches tall. He stopped counting them and started measuring them by the inch.
[51:39.680 --> 51:45.200] I'm hoping this has something to do with that, that it just increases the cost.
[51:47.520 --> 51:56.160] This lawyer is not a happy camper, and I think that's why I got that motion to dismiss
[51:56.160 --> 52:02.720] this. That was so stupid. I don't think the Chief Justice had anything to do with it. I think this
[52:02.720 --> 52:12.400] lawyer did it because he was PO'd at me. Young lawyers, wealthy parents, he's a bit petulant,
[52:13.040 --> 52:18.080] and he's going to pay me back, and good chance it'll end his career,
[52:19.120 --> 52:21.280] at least certainly with the Attorney General's office.
[52:21.280 --> 52:27.840] The point of this is, guys, I'm nobody. I live in Pohduck, Texas, out in the middle of nowhere,
[52:27.840 --> 52:35.600] in the oil patch. I get $830 a month for Social Security. I'm old, retired, buzzard.
[52:37.600 --> 52:45.600] And I take the guys, the highest judges in Texas, I take them on. If I can do this, anybody can do
[52:45.600 --> 52:56.720] this. And we'll tell you how. And it's become clear after 30 years of trying to fix the system,
[52:57.360 --> 53:05.120] after 30 years of bringing to their attention all their bad behavior, thinking that these
[53:05.120 --> 53:10.960] are otherwise reasonable people, when it's made clear to them that what they're doing is wrong,
[53:10.960 --> 53:17.600] they'll change it. My son-in-law got elected as a JP. I went through the system with him.
[53:18.800 --> 53:23.360] Then he gets elected, and he goes down to Austin for training, and they train him in a different
[53:23.360 --> 53:33.440] way of doing it. So who do you think he listened to? Well, the law, of course, right? Yeah,
[53:33.440 --> 53:36.960] he's otherwise right-minded. He wants to do the right thing.
[53:36.960 --> 53:44.960] But he's doing things the way he's trained to do things. He can't—he goes with the law said,
[53:44.960 --> 53:52.000] but clearly I have missed something. He can't wrap his head around the fact that everybody's
[53:52.000 --> 54:00.960] doing it wrong. So that's the problem we have. So how do we get their attention? Telling them
[54:00.960 --> 54:08.560] they're doing us wrong sure hasn't done it. Trying to get them arrested, everybody jumps in
[54:08.560 --> 54:13.280] there to protect them, and we wind up with more criminal charges than we can get to, and that
[54:13.280 --> 54:25.680] hasn't got it done. So the only thing that seems to get their attention is money. When you get into
[54:25.680 --> 54:34.080] their pockets, when you suck out part of their budget—you know, that wasn't my original goal,
[54:34.080 --> 54:40.640] but if that's all they'll listen to, I don't mind. Yeah, and we would never do something like
[54:40.640 --> 54:47.280] that for money. That would just be wrong. That's not why we're doing this. We're doing this because
[54:47.280 --> 54:56.800] that's what works. If you want to get a response, if you want to get effective change, you're going
[54:56.800 --> 55:06.800] to have to get in their pocket. And if you wind up getting large sums of money in settlements from
[55:06.800 --> 55:17.440] these guys, well, that's just something you'll have to deal with. I'm sitting now. Somebody's got to
[55:17.440 --> 55:27.200] do it. Yeah, somebody's got to do it. I'll stand up. I'll suffer through it. We are, Kara and I,
[55:27.200 --> 55:39.520] are sitting on a statutory right to default judgment on a $485 million suit against all the
[55:39.520 --> 55:46.320] highest judges in Texas and the directors of a number of agencies. And you would think they
[55:46.320 --> 55:54.480] would be a lot smarter. You'd think they would have done a lot better. You would think that they
[55:54.480 --> 56:00.160] would not have went to the attorney general to represent them when the Texas constitution
[56:00.160 --> 56:11.840] absolutely forbids it in no uncertain terms. These guys are not sharp as knife in the drawer.
[56:11.840 --> 56:18.640] I don't know where the sharp knives are when it comes to lawyers. I haven't found them,
[56:18.640 --> 56:27.040] especially those in public service. They've got bravado that can sometimes substitute.
[56:27.040 --> 56:37.920] Yeah. The point is you can take these guys on. It's just not that hard, but you don't take them
[56:37.920 --> 56:49.120] on knee jerk. They come after you. You respond by taking them on. No, no, no, that's not how it works.
[56:49.120 --> 56:57.360] If you want this to work well, go in there and play them like a cheap fiddle. Ask them to do
[56:57.360 --> 57:07.920] things you know they're not going to do. Then you become the plaintiff. Generally, when they come
[57:07.920 --> 57:16.240] after you, you're the defendant. It really sucks being the defendant because your liberty, your
[57:16.240 --> 57:24.480] equity, it's all at risk. They could take your life away from you. They take all you worked for
[57:24.480 --> 57:33.040] away from you, and it's oppressive. It's extremely difficult, but when you turn that shoe around,
[57:33.840 --> 57:45.760] oh my goodness, this is so much fun. You won't believe it. When you take it on public officials,
[57:45.760 --> 57:53.920] it's like they go out of their way to screw it up. My point is you can't do it. You can't do it.
[57:53.920 --> 58:03.920] You can fight City Hall. City Hall are used to people defending themselves from City Hall.
[58:05.680 --> 58:13.200] City Hall is not used for somebody coming in, setting them up so you have exactly the claims
[58:13.200 --> 58:19.920] that you want to have, the claims that are the most difficult for them to fight against,
[58:19.920 --> 58:26.640] and the claim that you have carefully researched because you got all the time in the world
[58:27.280 --> 58:34.560] to research out your claim. Once you file it, they have until the Monday after the 20th day,
[58:34.560 --> 58:43.200] generally around 21 days, to craft a response. Good luck, guys. My point is you can take on
[58:43.200 --> 58:52.160] City Hall. Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Would you like to make more definite
[58:52.160 --> 58:58.960] progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free
[58:58.960 --> 59:03.520] Christian books that can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most
[59:03.520 --> 59:09.200] comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands
[59:09.200 --> 59:14.640] of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a
[59:14.640 --> 59:20.480] three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements
[59:20.480 --> 59:26.800] of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build
[59:26.800 --> 59:33.120] up the church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.120 --> 59:49.200] Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.200 --> 01:00:14.960] We'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of
[01:00:14.960 --> 01:00:20.800] your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:25.920] you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will
[01:00:25.920 --> 01:00:31.760] start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[01:00:31.760 --> 01:00:37.280] yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[01:00:37.280 --> 01:00:43.920] Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with
[01:00:43.920 --> 01:00:50.160] Startpage. Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and
[01:00:50.160 --> 01:00:54.960] find a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:54.960 --> 01:00:59.520] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was
[01:00:59.520 --> 01:01:04.560] designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common
[01:01:04.560 --> 01:01:10.080] demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get it? So if you answer
[01:01:10.080 --> 01:01:14.560] a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the
[01:01:14.560 --> 01:01:19.840] Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[01:01:19.840 --> 01:01:35.520] at CatherineAlbrecht.com. The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.520 --> 01:01:40.240] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on
[01:01:40.240 --> 01:01:44.880] it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of
[01:01:44.880 --> 01:01:50.800] your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:01:50.800 --> 01:01:55.840] you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will
[01:01:55.840 --> 01:02:01.680] start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to
[01:02:01.680 --> 01:02:07.200] yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[01:02:07.200 --> 01:02:14.640] StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.240 --> 01:02:20.720] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of
[01:02:20.720 --> 01:02:25.760] x-ray goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:25.760 --> 01:02:31.040] from unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:31.040 --> 01:02:35.280] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:02:35.280 --> 01:02:40.880] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees
[01:02:40.880 --> 01:02:45.920] demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the Constitutional
[01:02:45.920 --> 01:02:50.720] alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their
[01:02:50.720 --> 01:02:56.400] googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[01:02:56.400 --> 01:03:01.200] at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:27.040 --> 01:03:31.680] I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:31.680 --> 01:03:38.400] Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:38.400 --> 01:03:45.280] Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy. Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body.
[01:03:45.280 --> 01:03:51.600] I won't pay for the boys with my money. Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:03:51.600 --> 01:04:02.800] Their whole agenda smells funny. I want to fight in a war of my own.
[01:04:02.800 --> 01:04:12.800] Okay, we are back. Greta Kelton, Brett Fountain, Lou of La Radio. Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:12.800 --> 01:04:17.840] We got some room on the board. So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be
[01:04:17.840 --> 01:04:23.760] taking your calls all night. We're going to Chris in Colorado. And Chris, before we get started,
[01:04:23.760 --> 01:04:32.640] will you send me an email? We have a caller who is working on a toeing issue.
[01:04:34.720 --> 01:04:39.200] And he sent me a request for introduction, but I couldn't find your email.
[01:04:39.200 --> 01:04:47.440] Sure. So I won't give him your email, but I will email you his request
[01:04:48.880 --> 01:04:54.640] and you contact him if you want to. Okay. Okay. What do you have for us today?
[01:04:57.280 --> 01:05:04.000] Well, I filed my second federal lawsuit a little over a month ago in Wyoming for
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:13.280] denial of service at the hospital. And I filed informal papyrus requests and also electronic
[01:05:13.280 --> 01:05:20.720] filing requests because Wyoming's a little old school. I got my forms. I got the responses for
[01:05:21.280 --> 01:05:29.360] some of this just this past week. And they originally assigned the case to a magistrate,
[01:05:29.360 --> 01:05:42.560] which was weird. The feds always do that. Okay. But somewhere in that, after the original assignment
[01:05:42.560 --> 01:05:47.920] and then going to look at the form of papyrus, I'm calling to find out they do things a little
[01:05:47.920 --> 01:05:52.480] differently in some states, because this is interesting. So this is the second form of
[01:05:52.480 --> 01:05:59.600] this is a second form of papyrus request I've done. But during this process, they screened my lawsuit.
[01:06:00.720 --> 01:06:08.000] They always, okay. The fed will always do that when you file informal papyrus. Okay.
[01:06:08.720 --> 01:06:13.360] But if there's anything wrong with it, they'll tell you. And then you can refile.
[01:06:13.360 --> 01:06:25.600] Okay. They kept almost all of it. The only thing they kicked out was my claim, or I don't even know
[01:06:25.600 --> 01:06:34.000] if it was a claim, but it was a damage. One of my damage requests was as a bystander due to negligent
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:40.160] infliction of emotional distress. They dismissed that without prejudice. I guess they didn't weave
[01:06:40.160 --> 01:06:47.840] that in properly. I have a confirmed violation of the EMTALA. EMTALA is the Emergency Medical
[01:06:48.400 --> 01:06:55.600] Labor Act. Emergency Medical Labor Treatment and Labor Act. Yeah. I already got a violation for
[01:06:55.600 --> 01:07:02.640] that from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. So that was not a hard one to get in. But then
[01:07:02.640 --> 01:07:11.120] I also filed negligence per se, and then some violations of statute,
[01:07:15.040 --> 01:07:23.840] mostly state statute, state laws. So I got a federal claim, some state claims. But I need
[01:07:23.840 --> 01:07:33.120] to get to the emotional distress in there somehow. So I'm not sure how to do that specifically.
[01:07:35.760 --> 01:07:44.480] Okay. Go online and look up O'Connor's causes of action.
[01:07:45.600 --> 01:07:50.640] Oh, that's right. They will tell you exactly how to craft that claim.
[01:07:50.640 --> 01:07:59.520] Okay. And if you're in the Fed, look for federal causes of action. I've actually got one here.
[01:07:59.520 --> 01:08:06.400] If you can't find one, send me an email. I will copy that section out of my copy and send it to you.
[01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:17.840] Okay. All right. So along with that, what else should I put in here? Because this is my more
[01:08:17.840 --> 01:08:24.000] complex question. When this gets to court, and I think I'm going to push this one all the way
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:29.760] to court, unless they write me a nice, nice big check. When this actually gets to trial,
[01:08:29.760 --> 01:08:34.720] there's going to be arguments over this mask thing. That's the whole crux of the case.
[01:08:34.720 --> 01:08:49.200] Governor Newsom in California just stated in an interview that if he knew then what he knows now
[01:08:49.200 --> 01:08:58.480] about COVID, he would do exactly the opposite of what he did. There's a lot of this kind of stuff
[01:08:58.480 --> 01:09:05.760] coming out. Are you familiar with our Masked Law Society channel on Telegram?
[01:09:07.280 --> 01:09:13.520] I am. I tend not to get on social media too much unless I get very direct, because
[01:09:14.560 --> 01:09:20.480] it tends to be a place for venting. So I don't know how to use it constructively, but there are-
[01:09:20.480 --> 01:09:26.160] Okay. Okay. These are our channels. We don't do venting. We don't do politics.
[01:09:26.160 --> 01:09:33.120] We don't let people get on there and rant and rave and jump up and down and wave their imaginary
[01:09:33.120 --> 01:09:41.360] arms. This is all about law. So you won't have a lot of that venting stuff. We get a little bit
[01:09:41.360 --> 01:09:50.320] of it, but we shut it down real fast. Okay. So I guess I'll pose my question there as to
[01:09:50.320 --> 01:09:57.360] what other claims I should bring into this, because this could be a bigger suit. Not that I
[01:09:57.360 --> 01:10:02.560] want to take it out on my own, but this is a mask issue. This was like one of the biggest things
[01:10:02.560 --> 01:10:08.560] they did to us besides backs everybody up. They forced people to wear this damn thing for no
[01:10:08.560 --> 01:10:14.160] reason at all, knowing it didn't work, and then hurt people with it by denying them service because
[01:10:14.160 --> 01:10:18.240] of it and treatment. And I'm not the only one. I mean, they killed people over this kind of crap.
[01:10:18.240 --> 01:10:23.760] Okay. This should get a private attorney general type suit.
[01:10:25.760 --> 01:10:29.680] I used to say a private attorney general suit, but we've got these guys out there thinking they can
[01:10:29.680 --> 01:10:36.720] be a private attorney general. Rod Klass, notwithstanding, he's one that promotes this.
[01:10:37.360 --> 01:10:44.800] You cannot be a private attorney general. Private attorney general suit is the name of a type of
[01:10:44.800 --> 01:10:53.760] suit the federal courts allow where there is an injury that's not so great as to warrant the cost
[01:10:54.320 --> 01:11:03.440] of civil action. They will allow one injured person to sue in his behalf and the behalf of
[01:11:03.440 --> 01:11:10.240] all others similarly situated. And Chris, I know you already know about this, but I'm explaining
[01:11:10.240 --> 01:11:16.720] it to everybody else so they'll know what we're talking about. So you get to make the claim for
[01:11:16.720 --> 01:11:24.880] everybody else, and that allows your claim to be large enough to warrant the cost of litigation.
[01:11:25.760 --> 01:11:32.880] So the point of that is, Chris, make a really big claim. It doesn't matter how big it is.
[01:11:32.880 --> 01:11:40.320] Just make up an estimate of how many people have been harmed similar to you. Yeah, 100,000,
[01:11:41.600 --> 01:11:50.160] 10,000. And you claim this much, so you claim this much times 10,000. It doesn't matter how
[01:11:50.160 --> 01:11:54.640] you get to the number, just so you can tell them something. This is how I got to the number,
[01:11:54.640 --> 01:11:58.960] because no matter what number you come up with, the lawyers on the other side is going to say
[01:11:58.960 --> 01:12:03.920] the number is outrageous and it's unreasonable. If you ask for 50 bucks, it's outrageous,
[01:12:03.920 --> 01:12:10.320] it's unreasonable, it should be five bucks. That's what they're going to do. But at the end of the
[01:12:10.320 --> 01:12:18.960] day, there is only one number the jury is going to remember. And the lawyers on the other side
[01:12:18.960 --> 01:12:26.560] know this. They're going to remember the number you walked in the door with. And generally, the
[01:12:26.560 --> 01:12:32.560] jury will give you a, if they rule in your favor, they'll give you a percentage of what you asked
[01:12:32.560 --> 01:12:49.920] for. So I suit a $485 million lawsuit. I'll take 1%. That'll work. But if you really get the
[01:12:49.920 --> 01:13:00.080] attention of the jury, and the tide on COVID has drastically changed, they may give you more.
[01:13:01.840 --> 01:13:06.960] But it'll almost always be a percentage of what you started with. So kick it up there.
[01:13:08.960 --> 01:13:13.200] I have not come up with a number. In this particular lawsuit, I did not put a number in
[01:13:13.200 --> 01:13:18.080] yet. I just basically stated that the amount in question is sufficient for the jurist to
[01:13:18.080 --> 01:13:23.760] question is sufficient for the jurisdiction of the court. Okay, don't do that. Don't do that. You
[01:13:23.760 --> 01:13:32.080] need to put in a number. See if you can find some lawsuits where people have been denied service
[01:13:32.800 --> 01:13:40.400] at a hospital. I have a lot. And see how much they asked for.
[01:13:40.400 --> 01:13:48.320] This is the other problem. I talk to too many lawyers, so mainly to learn, but also I've been
[01:13:48.320 --> 01:13:53.520] asking for help. But I guess in the end, it's always an education. A lot of these lawyers are
[01:13:53.520 --> 01:14:02.880] timid. I would say most lawyers are timid. Most of them don't have any courage. Maybe that's why
[01:14:02.880 --> 01:14:07.200] they become lawyers is to hide within- No, no. You can't blame the lawyers.
[01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:12.240] What? Yeah, when they go to law school, they don't tell them in law school, you're going to spend
[01:14:12.240 --> 01:14:19.680] the rest of your professional career kissing some arrogant judge's behinds. You do anything to annoy
[01:14:19.680 --> 01:14:26.000] that judge to help your client, he's going to screw your next client to get back at you.
[01:14:27.200 --> 01:14:32.720] That's what they're afraid of, and that is absolutely exactly what they will do.
[01:14:32.720 --> 01:14:38.960] So lawyers are in a difficult position. I'm not saying this to cut them any slack.
[01:14:39.760 --> 01:14:48.000] I mean, life is tough, but I understand why lawyers are timid, but that gives you a great
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:57.520] advantage. You're, per se, you don't have to be timid. No, you're right. You're not in their
[01:14:57.520 --> 01:15:06.640] dangling by your bar card. I just filed a response to a motion by the Chief Justice of the Texas
[01:15:06.640 --> 01:15:15.040] Supreme, and I ridiculed him like an errant stepchild. There is no lawyer in the state of
[01:15:15.040 --> 01:15:21.840] Texas who would imagine dressing down the Chief Justice of the Supreme. Yeah, I wouldn't dare.
[01:15:21.840 --> 01:15:30.240] Yeah, I don't care. What's he going to do to me? I'm, per se, I'm the baddest motor scooter in the
[01:15:30.240 --> 01:15:40.160] building. So lawyers have to be careful. They have to play politics, and you should play politics,
[01:15:40.160 --> 01:15:47.360] but you have a different politics to play. So look at cases. It's a lot of cases.
[01:15:47.360 --> 01:15:56.720] If you find controlling cases, those cases would have been winners, generally,
[01:15:57.760 --> 01:16:03.920] and there will be an amount in there. That's what I mean. It's so across the board.
[01:16:06.480 --> 01:16:11.920] Like I've seen where people, like I've looked up a lot of EMTALA cases, because EMTALA,
[01:16:11.920 --> 01:16:18.720] it has some bite to it. Most nurses and hospitals are all trained on it. There's actually
[01:16:19.920 --> 01:16:24.960] third party businesses that train hospitals and their staff on this EMTALA, so they don't violate
[01:16:24.960 --> 01:16:32.080] it. But I've looked at EMTALA cases and settlements. People have died because of a
[01:16:32.080 --> 01:16:40.080] wrongful denial of treatment, and they settle for $80,000. And then there's other ones that are
[01:16:40.080 --> 01:16:47.040] higher, but this is what I mean about the lawyers in this world. I don't know how many seconds we
[01:16:47.040 --> 01:16:52.240] got left, but I'll cut it off there. And I'll explain that when we come back.
[01:16:52.240 --> 01:16:57.040] The lawyers have a good reason for that. Hang on, Randy Kelton. Brett Fountain will be right back.
[01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:05.520] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop
[01:17:05.520 --> 01:17:11.360] debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal
[01:17:11.360 --> 01:17:16.400] court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in
[01:17:16.400 --> 01:17:22.080] plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted
[01:17:22.080 --> 01:17:27.600] by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors
[01:17:27.600 --> 01:17:32.640] out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you
[01:17:32.640 --> 01:17:38.480] to go away. The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.480 --> 01:17:44.240] Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.240 --> 01:17:51.600] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:51.600 --> 01:17:59.520] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.520 --> 01:18:05.040] I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so
[01:18:05.040 --> 01:18:09.680] addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed. I'd be lost without
[01:18:09.680 --> 01:18:14.960] logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer,
[01:18:14.960 --> 01:18:19.280] but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all
[01:18:19.280 --> 01:18:25.040] on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from
[01:18:25.040 --> 01:18:30.160] Amazon, you can help logos. You can order new supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do
[01:18:30.160 --> 01:18:37.680] is clear your cookies. Now go to logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.680 --> 01:18:43.920] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay
[01:18:43.920 --> 01:18:50.320] extra? No. Do I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean
[01:18:50.320 --> 01:18:56.880] yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.880 --> 01:19:20.960] We are welcome. Happy holidays, logos. This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:27.600 --> 01:19:28.960] Well,
[01:19:31.600 --> 01:19:41.520] ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:41.520 --> 01:19:49.440] You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand. Ain't gonna fool me with that same
[01:19:49.440 --> 01:20:17.920] old trick again. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old sucker punch. I get it now,
[01:20:17.920 --> 01:20:25.760] but then I must have been out here back then. Okay. We are back in Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:20:25.760 --> 01:20:31.280] Wheel of Law Radio. And when it went out, I was actually defending lawyers.
[01:20:33.040 --> 01:20:40.800] And, you know, they got their downside, but we have to understand where they live. Chris,
[01:20:40.800 --> 01:20:49.360] if you hire me to take on your case and I tell you that you give me a $10,000 retainer
[01:20:49.360 --> 01:20:57.040] and we'll sue these guys for a quarter of a million dollars, and you wind up getting $50,000,
[01:20:59.760 --> 01:21:09.440] you are going to be PO'd. But if I tell you I think I can get you $80,000 plus or minus,
[01:21:09.440 --> 01:21:16.480] and then we only get $50,000, are you going to be really PO'd at me?
[01:21:20.640 --> 01:21:28.560] Well, not really, but... See the problem the lawyer has? He can't create an unreasonable expectation.
[01:21:30.720 --> 01:21:37.840] He has to set a mark close in at a point where he can get pretty close to it.
[01:21:37.840 --> 01:21:46.720] But you don't. You can set the mark as high as you want to. Does that make sense?
[01:21:48.160 --> 01:21:54.800] It does. And I've learned a lot through my other case about biases. I won't talk much
[01:21:54.800 --> 01:22:00.080] about that tonight, but there's so many biases, just like the one you just spoke of, the fear,
[01:22:00.800 --> 01:22:07.200] the bias that you should be afraid of the judge. Well, why? Just like you said, why should we be
[01:22:07.200 --> 01:22:13.440] afraid of the judge? And I've met maybe one or two lawyers in this mix, and I've talked to a lot
[01:22:13.440 --> 01:22:18.080] that don't care with the judge. I mean, they're respectful, but they're not intimidated by the
[01:22:18.080 --> 01:22:25.760] judge in any manner. Every other one, I can smell that on them for sure. Yeah, they have good reason
[01:22:25.760 --> 01:22:35.760] to be afraid of the judges. The judges will screw them over, and they know it. Yeah, that other one
[01:22:35.760 --> 01:22:44.720] or two also ought to pay attention. They're just as vulnerable. Yeah, but they have to stir up a
[01:22:44.720 --> 01:22:51.200] lot in the end. I'll give you an example. There's a DA, district attorney, or who's the prosecutor?
[01:22:51.200 --> 01:22:58.640] District attorney, right? Yeah. There was a DA up in Wyoming, and I met her back in 21.
[01:22:59.440 --> 01:23:03.520] She came out to a Patriot meeting. They were having a lot of them up there, and I
[01:23:03.520 --> 01:23:08.400] had a lot of downtime from the accident, so I went to these, just to listen in here.
[01:23:08.960 --> 01:23:12.800] Anyway, they were going after her because she was actually fighting crime.
[01:23:14.320 --> 01:23:17.760] She wasn't going after petty theft and all that kind of stuff. She was actually going
[01:23:17.760 --> 01:23:23.200] after the criminals on the budgets that she had, and they were coming after her and suing her,
[01:23:23.200 --> 01:23:29.520] and it cost her hundreds of thousands of dollars. Well, I just read last, something happened in 22
[01:23:29.520 --> 01:23:34.800] where they finally pulled her license, but the reasons they pulled her license was absolutely
[01:23:34.800 --> 01:23:39.040] ridiculous. This was a nice woman, and she's smart, and she was doing the right thing,
[01:23:39.040 --> 01:23:43.600] and that's the reason they went after her, but it took them a while. They played dirty
[01:23:43.600 --> 01:23:48.720] for a long time. They didn't just pull their card. It took them three years, I guess, to do that to
[01:23:48.720 --> 01:23:56.640] her, but she was singled out. She didn't have a whole lot of friends up in the area, so it's
[01:23:56.640 --> 01:24:02.720] definitely still corrupt, even in Wyoming. Yeah, it's the same way everywhere, and one of
[01:24:02.720 --> 01:24:11.280] the things we talk about here is if you're going to get a lawyer, you have to protect your lawyer.
[01:24:14.480 --> 01:24:21.520] I have this huge suit, and I went in without a lawyer, and this is a plan. I plan on getting
[01:24:21.520 --> 01:24:27.280] a lawyer, but you don't want to get the lawyer until you beat him up for a while.
[01:24:28.320 --> 01:24:32.480] All of the motions and pleadings you want filed, you go ahead and file them,
[01:24:34.080 --> 01:24:38.080] and they're going to do all their song and dance and not want to hear the motions and all that.
[01:24:38.080 --> 01:24:43.440] You don't care about that. You just want to get everything into the court. Then you hire a lawyer,
[01:24:43.440 --> 01:24:52.960] and the lawyer comes in and inherits the case, so he has plausible deniability. He said,
[01:24:52.960 --> 01:24:58.720] don't blame me, Judge. I didn't file all this. I took this case and found this big mess.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:08.720] Help me get it sorted out. Now he can fight for your rights and have plausible deniability.
[01:25:08.720 --> 01:25:14.800] Otherwise, they'll do just what they did to this prosecutor.
[01:25:18.480 --> 01:25:27.120] It's a mess out there, and we need more people that'll come in. They needed people in Wyoming
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:35.360] that would go after the judges criminally and then sue them in the federal court.
[01:25:35.360 --> 01:25:42.560] We're in a republic, and that's what the citizens in a republic are for.
[01:25:47.520 --> 01:25:49.760] That's what you're doing. You're going after these guys.
[01:25:51.680 --> 01:25:54.080] We need more people doing exactly what you're doing.
[01:25:57.600 --> 01:26:03.280] I agree. It's not like we don't have a lot of people. We just need a lot of people to do it.
[01:26:03.280 --> 01:26:15.520] Yeah, that's part of the problem. I'm in Texas. The governor issues 21 absolutely illegal executive
[01:26:15.520 --> 01:26:29.200] orders, and one person in a state of 29 million does something about it. What the heck's going
[01:26:29.200 --> 01:26:41.680] on here, guys? Wake up. Who am I? I'm an old fat guy living on Social Security, an old disgruntled
[01:26:41.680 --> 01:26:49.760] veteran. Get the governor to drop all of these executive orders. We are the most powerful motor
[01:26:49.760 --> 01:26:58.240] scooters in the system. I understand why people don't get it. For the most part,
[01:26:58.240 --> 01:27:02.960] their only experience with the system is when the system's coming after them.
[01:27:06.240 --> 01:27:12.400] Chris, when you sued, how stressful was that for you?
[01:27:15.760 --> 01:27:24.160] Well, I should answer from where I am right now. There's very little, but I know the first go-around,
[01:27:24.160 --> 01:27:31.360] since you put me on the spot, I will say this. It's very stressful. The reason is because we
[01:27:31.360 --> 01:27:35.200] also have that program. It's like the being afraid of police, being afraid of the banks,
[01:27:35.200 --> 01:27:41.760] being afraid of the boss, but I'm not a kid anymore. I'm in my mid-40s, and so I'm tired of all that.
[01:27:41.760 --> 01:27:50.480] So, after your first two or three times in court, how did things change?
[01:27:51.440 --> 01:27:57.760] Oh, yeah. I mean, the judge and I were on almost a first-name basis. She would call me Chris all
[01:27:57.760 --> 01:28:05.680] the time instead of Mr. So-and-so. I would always say, your honor, but she would literally, at some
[01:28:05.680 --> 01:28:12.240] of those hearings, call me by my first name. So, it got to be very personal, and we got to know each
[01:28:12.240 --> 01:28:18.800] other. And then when things got a little bit egregious, and slightly egregious, meaning they
[01:28:18.800 --> 01:28:25.840] were biased, I would call them out. And here's the interesting thing. They would listen, because
[01:28:25.840 --> 01:28:32.240] they're not used to people barking back at them. And as soon as you bark them back, they step back.
[01:28:32.240 --> 01:28:40.720] And it was interesting to watch the judge do that. I wish Tina was on. I think you've talked to Tina
[01:28:40.720 --> 01:28:49.760] before. Briefly, yeah. She just kicked butt in a foreclosure case. Big win. Big time win. Good.
[01:28:50.560 --> 01:28:58.160] But she spoke the same way. And this is what I'm trying to get people to recognize and understand.
[01:28:58.160 --> 01:29:02.960] For the most part, they only deal with the system when the system's coming after them.
[01:29:05.120 --> 01:29:12.960] But when you get out of traffic court, traffic court is absolutely, by far, the most corrupt,
[01:29:12.960 --> 01:29:19.200] egregious courts in the country. They go to traffic court, and they're so horribly illegal and so
[01:29:19.200 --> 01:29:29.440] abusive, they get the idea that the entire system is totally corrupt. It's not. When you get up out
[01:29:29.440 --> 01:29:36.800] of these lower courts into the higher courts, you get more sophisticated judges, especially in the
[01:29:36.800 --> 01:29:48.320] Fed. They treat the civil courts in the Fed are actually civil, and they treat you with dignity
[01:29:48.320 --> 01:29:53.040] and respect, and you can actually get something done. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Red Fountain. We'll
[01:29:53.040 --> 01:30:02.640] be right back. Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks can make you fat. The new study shows that
[01:30:02.640 --> 01:30:07.360] diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:30:07.360 --> 01:30:33.200] Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:37.360 --> 01:30:51.840] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers at UT
[01:30:51.840 --> 01:30:56.560] San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found that
[01:30:56.560 --> 01:31:02.640] regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.640 --> 01:31:07.520] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars,
[01:31:07.520 --> 01:31:12.880] don't deliver anything to squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings,
[01:31:12.880 --> 01:31:18.000] which can result in a larger overall calorie intake. So use natural sweeteners to maintain
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.720] a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink
[01:31:22.720 --> 01:31:28.480] water instead. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:28.480 --> 01:31:35.840] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. The
[01:31:35.840 --> 01:31:41.680] government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a
[01:31:41.680 --> 01:31:45.760] controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and
[01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:50.400] thousands of my fellow first responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[01:31:50.400 --> 01:31:54.560] engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his
[01:31:54.560 --> 01:32:00.160] son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:25.440 --> 01:32:28.480] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.480 --> 01:32:32.320] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[01:32:32.320 --> 01:32:36.480] due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this
[01:32:36.480 --> 01:32:41.200] invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[01:32:41.200 --> 01:32:45.120] you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:45.120 --> 01:32:49.600] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful
[01:32:49.600 --> 01:32:52.960] resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[01:32:52.960 --> 01:32:58.000] ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:23.840] and deserve. Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:28.000 --> 01:33:42.720] Okay, we are back. Brandon Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday,
[01:33:43.360 --> 01:33:53.280] the 15th day of September 2023, on our 4-hour Info Marathon. We have some room on the caller
[01:33:53.280 --> 01:34:03.360] board. If you have a question or comment, give us a call. 512-646-1984. We're talking to Chris
[01:34:03.360 --> 01:34:12.000] in Colorado. Chris, I was preaching today. I did the first hour or so. We're trying to convince
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:20.720] people that you really can't take these guys on. I kind of used up your time. What was it
[01:34:20.720 --> 01:34:27.600] you wanted to talk about? Well, more about just expanding the suit, but I did want to just say
[01:34:27.600 --> 01:34:33.440] one more thing about this intimidation that people have about the system. Here's kind of what I've
[01:34:33.440 --> 01:34:37.360] learned. I've been doing this for a couple of years now, and I'm not definitely pro-ed by any
[01:34:37.360 --> 01:34:43.040] means. I'm about to start studying even harder, but it's like this. It's like you're going into
[01:34:43.040 --> 01:34:48.640] somebody's house. That courtroom is the judge's courtroom. They kind of earn their respect,
[01:34:48.640 --> 01:34:53.600] but they also like a little humor. They like a little personality in their courtroom, and they
[01:34:53.600 --> 01:34:59.760] respond to it. The lawyers are usually pretty dry. There's a few that have some personality,
[01:34:59.760 --> 01:35:05.840] but usually they're really dry, by the books, monotone. You can bring a smile or a joke or
[01:35:05.840 --> 01:35:13.200] whatever. The judges respond to that, and they will generally interact. At least that's been
[01:35:13.200 --> 01:35:20.720] my mental experience. My favorite one, I once wrote a pleading, and I put in Scheister this,
[01:35:20.720 --> 01:35:26.000] Scheister that, and started to do a search and replace and take it out and
[01:35:26.880 --> 01:35:33.680] replace it with counselor or lawyer, the opposing counsel. I said heck with it and just left it.
[01:35:34.880 --> 01:35:42.160] The judge is reading the pleading, and he's trying not to crack a smile. When he got to the end, he
[01:35:42.160 --> 01:35:51.680] looked up and said, Mr. Kelton, I'm sure you thought that was humorous, but we're not going
[01:35:51.680 --> 01:35:57.840] to do that again, are we? Oh, judge, my bad, my bad. I meant to do a search and replace,
[01:35:58.480 --> 01:36:07.120] and I just forgot to. Sure, you did, but clearly it broke up his day a little bit.
[01:36:07.120 --> 01:36:16.480] Even the lawyer got a chuckle out of it, but yeah, they are human beings.
[01:36:19.120 --> 01:36:27.120] The pleading I just filed, Kara referenced a point in there where I accused the judge of
[01:36:27.120 --> 01:36:37.200] berating me, of talking bad about me, and I said I've been married for 50 years, and I'm very used
[01:36:37.200 --> 01:36:46.160] to people talking bad about me, but even my wife doesn't talk that bad. She said, I don't know if
[01:36:46.160 --> 01:36:55.440] that's a good idea, and I told her, yeah, it is, leave it in there. You need to break it up a little
[01:36:55.440 --> 01:37:03.920] bit. Don't make it too heavy, because you are dealing with judges as a human being. Martichet
[01:37:04.960 --> 01:37:13.760] Olivier in Florida in a federal case started with a traffic ticket. He took it to the feds,
[01:37:14.640 --> 01:37:21.280] and he filed suit, and they dismissed it without prejudice, and he was furious. He called in,
[01:37:21.280 --> 01:37:29.600] he was just furious, and I explained to him, I said look, the feds will tell you what's wrong
[01:37:29.600 --> 01:37:36.480] with your case. They'll tell you how to fix it, and they'll tell the other side the same thing,
[01:37:36.480 --> 01:37:45.120] so they're not making favorites. Pay real close attention, and I suggested that he do what Tina did,
[01:37:45.120 --> 01:37:53.600] and what I've done in cases is you start out with the court's criticisms are well taken,
[01:37:54.960 --> 01:38:02.960] and then address what you've done to tell what you've done to address the criticisms.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:11.280] He did that, and they dismissed a second time, but after he read the case, he called us back,
[01:38:11.280 --> 01:38:17.680] and he said you were right. They were telling me what's wrong with my suit, so he put in there that
[01:38:17.680 --> 01:38:22.240] their criticisms were well taken, and filed a second one, and they dismissed that one,
[01:38:23.520 --> 01:38:30.640] and three different times in their response, they referenced the fact that Mr. Martichet
[01:38:30.640 --> 01:38:37.680] indicated that our criticisms were well taken, and we hope that these will be well taken,
[01:38:37.680 --> 01:38:44.160] or taken as well, something like that, but they made a point to address that three different times.
[01:38:47.040 --> 01:38:55.760] That meant they felt like they were respected, and they responded in kind, so at the end of the day,
[01:38:55.760 --> 01:39:01.440] judges are human beings. We have a lot of people in the patriot movement that think that all the
[01:39:01.440 --> 01:39:10.000] judges are a bunch of crazed criminals who have no respect or regard for the public. Well, there are
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:18.720] some that way, but not that many. If you pick a fight with them, they'll fight you. If you're
[01:39:18.720 --> 01:39:26.480] disrespectful to them, they'll be disrespectful as well, but that's human beings, and when you get
[01:39:26.480 --> 01:39:35.840] out of these traffic courts and up into the higher courts, it gets more civil. It's a lot easier to
[01:39:35.840 --> 01:39:47.600] work with them, and when you're the plaintiff, oh, it's a lot more fun. Anyway, okay, I'll shut up
[01:39:47.600 --> 01:39:57.600] now. I'll quit preaching. Okay, so I should go to the law group in the telegram and just chat with
[01:39:57.600 --> 01:40:04.240] them and see how we can expand this into something more significant, because this is going to be one
[01:40:04.240 --> 01:40:07.920] of those things where I can bring in evidence. I can bring in all kinds of stuff, and that hospital
[01:40:07.920 --> 01:40:12.000] is going to be on the dime for why they do what they do and why they did what they did.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:20.320] Yes, and on the channel, it has a section for documentation. You'll find all kinds of stuff.
[01:40:21.840 --> 01:40:29.600] Okay. All right, I'll do that, and then the last thing here, though, is interesting. I don't know
[01:40:29.600 --> 01:40:35.760] if it means anything or not, but this case was assigned to the magistrate judge. Now, they didn't
[01:40:35.760 --> 01:40:42.640] even do that in Illinois as a first judge, so to speak. In Illinois, I got assigned to a district
[01:40:42.640 --> 01:40:46.640] judge, and then he tried to shuffle it off to the magistrate as soon as he could. He didn't even ask
[01:40:46.640 --> 01:40:54.560] for permission. He just did it. Yeah, they all do that. The courts are just so overcrowded
[01:40:55.760 --> 01:41:00.880] that they started using magistrate judge. The magistrate judge does not make rulings.
[01:41:00.880 --> 01:41:09.520] He merely hears the case and makes a suggestion to the trial judge, and the vast majority of
[01:41:09.520 --> 01:41:16.240] the time, the trial judge will accept what the magistrate says. The trouble is, the magistrate
[01:41:16.240 --> 01:41:22.240] doesn't typically get an actual referral. They just have a standing order that says,
[01:41:22.240 --> 01:41:30.800] anything that happens, do this load balancing thing. There's no actual referral of any particular
[01:41:30.800 --> 01:41:36.480] matter, and they don't hold any hearings. They just look at the paperwork and see if they can
[01:41:36.480 --> 01:41:44.320] figure out what they're going to recommend with no hearings. Yeah. Every time I write, I do a
[01:41:44.320 --> 01:41:52.000] federal suit. In this one, I started out with an objection to oral argument and asked the court to
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:42:00.560] make all its rulings on the pleadings. I don't want to get in there and stand toe to toe to
[01:42:00.560 --> 01:42:10.400] learned counsel. Someone with eight to 12 years in college and who knows how many times he's been in
[01:42:10.400 --> 01:42:21.360] court on these issues, this guy's a pro. I am out of my league. In the objection, I raised the objection
[01:42:21.360 --> 01:42:30.560] that to pit a seasoned professional against a pro se is patently unfair. I do not want to go,
[01:42:31.840 --> 01:42:38.320] it's too dangerous. Give me time to sit down and study everything I'm going to put on paper.
[01:42:38.320 --> 01:42:48.080] So I can make sure it's right. Tina, she likes oral argument, but it's kind of up to the individual.
[01:42:48.080 --> 01:42:55.360] I personally don't. Okay, I'll shut up now. Well, here's what's interesting. They didn't do this in
[01:42:55.360 --> 01:43:04.720] Illinois, but this is straight out in the order here. Wyoming states that a pro se is not to be
[01:43:04.720 --> 01:43:12.240] considered, where's the wording here? Therefore, his pleadings are to be construed liberally and
[01:43:12.240 --> 01:43:18.320] held to less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by a lawyer. I should quote that.
[01:43:19.360 --> 01:43:26.640] Well, that is a federal, Brett, is that a federal rule or is it case law?
[01:43:26.640 --> 01:43:34.000] I believe it's case law. I seem to recall citing it. Yeah, all of the federal courts are supposed
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:39.600] to do that. They didn't do that in Illinois. Well, I started to say they're supposed to.
[01:43:39.600 --> 01:43:48.720] That doesn't mean they do. Okay, hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio,
[01:43:48.720 --> 01:43:59.360] our call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Through advances in technology, our lives
[01:43:59.360 --> 01:44:04.560] have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than
[01:44:04.560 --> 01:44:10.080] they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and
[01:44:10.080 --> 01:44:16.080] disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural resources
[01:44:16.080 --> 01:44:21.120] is good nutrition, in a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated,
[01:44:21.120 --> 01:44:27.120] and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets
[01:44:27.120 --> 01:44:32.720] many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[01:44:32.720 --> 01:44:38.880] Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[01:44:38.880 --> 01:44:44.880] and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve
[01:44:44.880 --> 01:44:50.240] as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity,
[01:44:50.240 --> 01:44:55.280] you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.280 --> 01:44:59.760] help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:01.040 --> 01:45:05.920] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[01:45:05.920 --> 01:45:12.320] with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:12.320 --> 01:45:19.520] in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you
[01:45:19.520 --> 01:45:25.360] don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[01:45:25.360 --> 01:45:32.480] course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[01:45:32.480 --> 01:45:38.320] case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.320 --> 01:45:44.000] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:51.680] our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[01:45:51.680 --> 01:46:08.960] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.680 --> 01:46:32.160] Okay, we are back. Randy Telton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Chris
[01:46:32.160 --> 01:46:39.600] in Colorado. Okay, Chris, go ahead. I'm going to shut up now. Okay. It's all good. This is
[01:46:39.600 --> 01:46:49.280] exactly what I need. So here's the other order, second order, is that the above case is hereby
[01:46:49.280 --> 01:47:00.560] reassigned from the magistrate judge to the chief United States district judge. Whoa. And I did say
[01:47:00.560 --> 01:47:08.800] chief. Do you have any idea why they did that? Well, they're saying that it was erroneously
[01:47:08.800 --> 01:47:16.240] assigned to the U.S. magistrate judge. But then they say the reassignment was completed through
[01:47:16.240 --> 01:47:21.280] random, through the random assignment process. But the judge who signed this order is the same
[01:47:21.280 --> 01:47:27.360] judge that it was assigned to, the chief district judge of Wyoming. There's only one district in
[01:47:27.360 --> 01:47:43.200] Wyoming. Why does the chief judge want to hear this? That's my question. This sounds like,
[01:47:43.200 --> 01:47:56.000] it sounds like politics going on. It could be. What is the politics in Wyoming concerning masks
[01:47:57.280 --> 01:48:07.600] and the COVID issue? Well, nobody wants to wear it. I moved up there because that's why I was
[01:48:07.600 --> 01:48:12.480] there because nobody was wearing it. You had a few crazy people doing it, but there was just,
[01:48:12.480 --> 01:48:17.920] they didn't give a crap. Middle of the pandemic, nobody's wearing it. But it's kind of like most
[01:48:17.920 --> 01:48:26.960] of Texas, right? Except in Houston and down in the cities. Yeah. But the hospital is a big issue
[01:48:26.960 --> 01:48:31.200] there. Nobody likes that hospital. But the people who work on the health department,
[01:48:31.840 --> 01:48:40.080] they stirred up politics. They had a full on video evidence of them violating law, violating my right.
[01:48:40.080 --> 01:48:47.680] Instead of hitting them with that, they gave them a quasi violation where they didn't log me. Well,
[01:48:47.680 --> 01:48:53.120] if you read into that, that means that I was there and they didn't handle me properly. I can crack
[01:48:53.120 --> 01:48:57.200] that door open now because I have that, but they didn't come right out and say that you refuse
[01:48:57.200 --> 01:49:02.880] service. They just said they didn't log me. So there is something going on. There are some
[01:49:02.880 --> 01:49:11.120] protections going on, but I haven't figured it out yet. Well, are there any other cases in process
[01:49:11.120 --> 01:49:17.120] against that hospital? There's always cases against that hospital. I just haven't looked at any of them.
[01:49:19.040 --> 01:49:19.920] Something's going on.
[01:49:19.920 --> 01:49:31.680] Something political is going on. This went to the chief justice or the head judge.
[01:49:35.280 --> 01:49:43.760] Either they want to screw you big time or shut you down or they have something planned for the hospital.
[01:49:43.760 --> 01:49:48.560] This is not a private hospital, is it?
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:57.920] It's quasi private. It's the only main hospital in Wyoming. It's a bigger state,
[01:49:57.920 --> 01:50:04.080] but it's not a big population. They get federal funding, so they're a quasi private hospital.
[01:50:04.080 --> 01:50:07.120] They are a private hospital, but they get federal funding.
[01:50:07.120 --> 01:50:15.440] Something's going on. I don't know enough information,
[01:50:15.440 --> 01:50:17.840] don't have enough information, but you should be concerned.
[01:50:21.440 --> 01:50:25.600] I'm not worried, though, because he didn't kick my suit out. In fact,
[01:50:25.600 --> 01:50:31.280] he didn't kick anything out. All he did was state that I can't claim damages under
[01:50:31.280 --> 01:50:36.160] one of my damage things. He didn't kick out a single one of my accounts.
[01:50:37.600 --> 01:50:47.440] That's also strange. Generally, when a pro se files, I filed one and they kicked it back
[01:50:48.320 --> 01:50:54.800] and told me to fix it and refile it. I think I'm pretty good at this.
[01:50:54.800 --> 01:51:06.000] Why didn't they kick yours back? It sounds like they want to use your suit for something.
[01:51:11.120 --> 01:51:11.520] Could be.
[01:51:16.560 --> 01:51:21.600] On the surface, I want to think it sounds like a good thing because you get the chief judge,
[01:51:21.600 --> 01:51:28.320] but be careful. I want to talk to people about this,
[01:51:28.320 --> 01:51:33.760] but he granted my form of papyrus and he granted my full suit. Nothing was kicked out except one
[01:51:33.760 --> 01:51:40.320] little mistake I made on my damage claim. I had one sentence on a damage claim that he made issue
[01:51:40.320 --> 01:51:52.160] with. My prayer for relief. Not any of my accounts. Just my prayer for relief. One sentence.
[01:51:54.160 --> 01:51:59.040] It may be the fact that you wrote a competent pleading
[01:52:01.520 --> 01:52:05.120] and you're going to a place that apparently he wants to go to.
[01:52:05.120 --> 01:52:08.880] Maybe I should do some more research. Maybe I should get a hold of that DA that got kicked
[01:52:08.880 --> 01:52:14.240] out and see who this guy really is. Yeah, she will probably understand the
[01:52:14.240 --> 01:52:22.800] politics really well. Did they just bar her altogether or did they just remove her as
[01:52:22.800 --> 01:52:28.560] a prosecutor? They took her bar license away. Permanent or just temporary?
[01:52:28.560 --> 01:52:35.120] Well, I don't know enough about that. I'm sure what they did was bad, but it looked permanent.
[01:52:35.120 --> 01:52:44.560] It sure looked permanent. There's some dirty players up there. Come on, what's her name?
[01:52:44.560 --> 01:52:48.080] Liz Cheney? She rebranded as a Republican?
[01:52:48.080 --> 01:53:01.840] Yeah. They finally kicked her butt out,
[01:53:01.840 --> 01:53:06.320] but there's a lot of people like her up there who were doing a lot of damage, but they got her out
[01:53:06.320 --> 01:53:14.880] finally. I've talked to the senators up there about this, but they don't know what they're
[01:53:14.880 --> 01:53:21.200] doing. They're just regular folks because no one else would do the job, but they called me back.
[01:53:21.200 --> 01:53:26.560] They said, I call all my people back because I want to make sure, but they straight up said,
[01:53:26.560 --> 01:53:29.600] I can't help you. I don't know how to help you.
[01:53:34.240 --> 01:53:40.000] Okay, and I don't know how to answer. I don't have an answer for you other than to pay close
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:46.640] attention. It sounds like it's something in your favor, but it may not be.
[01:53:48.800 --> 01:53:56.880] Yeah. If you have problems in your suit and he reads your suit and he sees that it's well
[01:53:56.880 --> 01:54:03.600] structured, he may want this to go away and he may want to make sure that it goes away.
[01:54:03.600 --> 01:54:10.880] Okay. Those portions of your suit that were problematic,
[01:54:12.480 --> 01:54:17.200] there may be portions that were problematic that he didn't tell you about so he can use it against
[01:54:17.200 --> 01:54:25.600] you later. Well, I mean, I plagiarized the heck out of this. I took claims from other people who had
[01:54:26.240 --> 01:54:32.720] lawyers who filed Antalya Act. It's only eight pages. Most of the Antalya violations that I
[01:54:32.720 --> 01:54:37.200] found, most of the Antalya lawsuits that I saw, they were pretty right to the point.
[01:54:38.160 --> 01:54:46.720] But do you have any current articles written in local magazines or newspapers concerning this
[01:54:48.720 --> 01:54:57.440] program? I don't have any articles. No, I have the law itself, the act, and then I have lots of
[01:54:57.440 --> 01:55:04.320] lawyers across the country who have filed for those violations. It's a quasi medical malpractice.
[01:55:04.960 --> 01:55:12.960] What you do is you use the Antalya as the violation, but then you back it into a local
[01:55:12.960 --> 01:55:17.520] medical malpractice and then a negligence per se. That's what I've seen in more than one situation.
[01:55:17.520 --> 01:55:24.880] That's why it wasn't that hard to copy this suit, so to speak. The words are generally the same,
[01:55:24.880 --> 01:55:30.640] so I don't think this is anything new to these guys. But what's unique about my suit is that
[01:55:30.640 --> 01:55:35.040] it's a mask issue, really. And he even made a point of that, that I refused to wear a mask,
[01:55:36.640 --> 01:55:39.280] but obviously, it was unable to catch his breath at the time.
[01:55:42.160 --> 01:55:46.800] They didn't say I couldn't wear a mask, claiming he was unable to catch his breath at the time.
[01:55:46.800 --> 01:55:53.440] Well, it's true. I could barely breathe that day. So nobody filed any suits about that. There's
[01:55:53.440 --> 01:55:57.120] suits where they denied them excess, somebody had a seizure, somebody had a heart attack,
[01:55:57.120 --> 01:56:04.000] somebody died. They're usually pretty major things. So this is one of those topics that,
[01:56:05.440 --> 01:56:07.520] I don't know if anybody's done this specific one.
[01:56:08.240 --> 01:56:16.400] Okay. I'm thinking, I'm the judge. Why would I do this? It sounds like yours is not so major.
[01:56:16.400 --> 01:56:28.560] So, he may want a suit that's clean to the facts and doesn't have an overriding major claim
[01:56:29.760 --> 01:56:37.680] that would cloud the issue. He may want to give a good ruling on this particular issue
[01:56:37.680 --> 01:56:43.920] and not have it clouded with a death or near death. You know, you were injured, but not that
[01:56:43.920 --> 01:56:53.360] greatly. So not great enough to make national news or anything, and wouldn't usurp the nature of the
[01:56:53.360 --> 01:57:01.680] ruling that he gives. So you mean maybe steering the ship slightly in the favorable direction?
[01:57:01.680 --> 01:57:07.680] That's what it sounds like to me, but I'm just trying to understand the underlying politics.
[01:57:07.680 --> 01:57:18.800] If I'm that chief judge, why would I do this? I picked this case to move up to me so that I can
[01:57:18.800 --> 01:57:26.000] rule on it. What am I trying to achieve? And he made the point of mentioning the mask issue.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:31.520] So he may want to make a ruling about these masks to put this issue away.
[01:57:36.480 --> 01:57:39.840] Then if Wyoming wasn't crazy about the masks to start with,
[01:57:40.800 --> 01:57:43.520] he may want to make a definitive statement about them.
[01:57:45.520 --> 01:57:50.160] That's all speculation, but I'm just trying to run through the possibilities. Brett got
[01:57:50.160 --> 01:57:57.520] any ideas that I missed? No, I mean, we're just guessing, right? So those do seem like
[01:58:00.480 --> 01:58:04.640] possibilities worth considering. I just, I don't see any different ones.
[01:58:06.160 --> 01:58:09.120] I'll start doing some research. I'll drive up there and see if I can't find some of the
[01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:14.000] and see what they think. Somebody who knows the judge.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:19.040] Good, good. Cause something's going on here, clearly.
[01:58:19.040 --> 01:58:23.040] Okay. Do you have anything else for us on the other side?
[01:58:23.040 --> 01:58:27.040] No, that's it. I'll check back in when I have some more news. Thank you guys very much.
[01:58:27.040 --> 01:58:31.040] Okay. And make sure you send me an email so I can send you this request.
[01:58:31.040 --> 01:58:33.040] Yeah, I'll do that right now.
[01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:36.640] Okay. Thank you, Chris. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountainhouse.
[01:58:36.640 --> 01:58:44.640] We'll have our radio. We'll be right back.
[01:59:06.880 --> 01:59:13.360] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.360 --> 01:59:17.600] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.160 --> 01:59:24.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the
[01:59:24.000 --> 01:59:29.440] riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would
[01:59:29.440 --> 01:59:35.120] like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact
[01:59:35.120 --> 01:59:45.360] study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102, or by ordering online
[01:59:45.360 --> 01:59:53.200] at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[01:59:53.200 --> 02:00:05.600] logosradionetwork.com.