ROL_2023-09-14_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.680 --> 00:09.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.360 --> 00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.760 --> 00:16.880]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.880 --> 00:18.480]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.480 --> 00:22.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.080 --> 00:26.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.840 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:33.000]  Privacy.
[00:33.000 --> 00:34.600]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.600 --> 00:38.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:38.880 --> 00:42.440]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.440 --> 00:44.880]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.880 --> 00:46.480]  Spar.
[00:46.480 --> 00:47.720]  It's what fighters do.
[00:47.720 --> 00:50.680]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.680 --> 00:54.400]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.400 --> 00:56.460]  S-P-A-R with an extra P.
[00:56.460 --> 01:02.840]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:02.840 --> 01:06.920]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.920 --> 01:08.440]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.440 --> 01:10.800]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.800 --> 01:14.520]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.520 --> 01:18.040]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.040 --> 01:20.640]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.640 --> 01:22.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.640 --> 01:31.020]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.020 --> 01:34.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.680 --> 01:38.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.120 --> 01:39.600]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.600 --> 01:43.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.520 --> 01:46.640]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.640 --> 01:48.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.840 --> 01:56.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.600 --> 02:01.640]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.640 --> 02:04.360]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.360 --> 02:08.640]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.640 --> 02:12.200]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.200 --> 02:14.280]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.280 --> 02:20.120]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.120 --> 02:22.200]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.200 --> 02:26.680]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.680 --> 02:30.520]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.520 --> 02:31.520]  Get it?
[02:31.520 --> 02:33.840]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.840 --> 02:37.440]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.440 --> 02:38.440]  when he said,
[02:38.440 --> 02:43.600]  "...the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.600 --> 02:48.720]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically
[02:48.720 --> 02:50.480]  has proved to always be possible."
[02:50.480 --> 02:52.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.360 --> 03:21.280]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:23.360 --> 03:50.600]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[03:50.600 --> 04:08.440]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[04:08.440 --> 04:34.160]  now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[04:34.160 --> 04:49.800]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[04:49.800 --> 05:01.440]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[05:01.440 --> 05:21.240]  now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now
[05:21.240 --> 05:43.920]  appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears
[05:43.920 --> 05:54.520]  number is 512-646-1984. You can call in with your legal questions, comments, have some
[05:54.520 --> 06:07.720]  issues you're trying to deal with. 512-646-1984. So, on the case that I've got right now before
[06:07.720 --> 06:15.960]  the federal circuit court, we have, there's a, when you go to federal court, you start
[06:15.960 --> 06:22.520]  in the district court, and then after that, you, when you appeal, you go to the circuit
[06:22.520 --> 06:28.760]  court. And right now, I've got in my appellant brief, I'm the appellant because I brought
[06:28.760 --> 06:35.080]  the appeal, and then the other side brought their appellee's brief, and then I made a
[06:35.080 --> 06:41.960]  reply. At this point, we're waiting to hear what the court's going to say. Now, I've
[06:41.960 --> 06:49.120]  asked for oral argument. So, there's nothing that's quite like the, in appeals court,
[06:49.120 --> 06:54.720]  you don't have the rule 12 I of the civil procedures, which allows you to move for a
[06:54.720 --> 07:03.280]  hearing before trial. So, we just have to wait. We do have one caller already. Go ahead
[07:03.280 --> 07:08.680]  and take Tina in California. Good evening, Tina. What's on your mind?
[07:08.680 --> 07:18.040]  Yes. Oh, well, I just wanted to give a couple of updates to my two cases, and then ask a
[07:18.040 --> 07:24.760]  little advice. In the adversary proceeding case that's been going on for, you know,
[07:24.760 --> 07:30.000]  just over three years, almost four, against the consignment store that stole hundreds
[07:30.000 --> 07:37.360]  of people's property and sold it and didn't pay them. We finally got a ruling from the
[07:37.360 --> 07:45.200]  judge, and he denied their bankruptcy just chapter seven discharge. He gave us three
[07:45.200 --> 07:56.240]  out of the five actions that we'd asked for claims. He gave us a monetary judgment, and
[07:56.240 --> 08:01.240]  the only thing he didn't give us was punitive because he said they've got enough debt as
[08:01.240 --> 08:07.800]  it is, and I've just awarded you collectively 80 something thousand for the four of us.
[08:07.800 --> 08:12.000]  And he didn't give us RICO, and I figured he wouldn't, but I put it in there anyway
[08:12.000 --> 08:21.480]  because, you know, give him something to deny us. And then he wrote that order on the 30th.
[08:21.480 --> 08:28.040]  We all got a copy of it on the 5th of September. Three days later, the defendants filed a chapter
[08:28.040 --> 08:31.040]  13 bankruptcy.
[08:31.040 --> 08:44.480]  Oh my goodness. Wow. Well, congratulations, and I'm so sorry to hear that.
[08:44.480 --> 08:51.400]  I just got in on the tail of that. Did I get that right? You wiped the floor with her?
[08:51.400 --> 09:01.640]  We wiped the floor. We are on the 1% of people, because apparently 99% of chapter sevens are
[09:01.640 --> 09:07.760]  given a discharge. She didn't get hers. So we're in that 1%. And the attorneys that,
[09:07.760 --> 09:13.000]  you know, we've been checking in with in the bankruptcy health clinic said pro se litigants
[09:13.000 --> 09:18.200]  never win adversary proceeding cases. And we've gone...
[09:18.200 --> 09:26.960]  Unless they just happen to be Tina. Unless they happen to be a bit churnish.
[09:26.960 --> 09:36.400]  Tenacious is more like it. But she had two attorneys in the AP case, four attorneys in
[09:36.400 --> 09:44.640]  her chapter seven and one in her previous chapter 13. Now she has another attorney group,
[09:44.640 --> 09:52.280]  and this is down in another, in South LA, the last one was in Central District. And
[09:52.280 --> 09:58.440]  she still has the criminal case against her and she's on her third attorney there. But
[09:58.440 --> 10:06.680]  what I have read is that you can't file a chapter 13 after not getting a chapter seven
[10:06.680 --> 10:14.840]  discharge if you willfully disobeyed any of the court orders. And the judge was very clear
[10:14.840 --> 10:22.000]  in his orders, very detailed. The defendant disobeyed the court order that they had to
[10:22.000 --> 10:29.520]  produce pretrial stipulation. We do this meet and confer. They didn't come with the required
[10:29.520 --> 10:35.560]  documents to the pretrial hearing. They did not come to court when they were required
[10:35.560 --> 10:41.720]  to in person. And so he put all this in that they disobeyed these orders. And everything
[10:41.720 --> 10:48.480]  I found said, you can't... It will not be granted if you do this. Now she's paid $1,500
[10:48.480 --> 10:55.040]  to these new attorney firms. She owes them another $3,500. So I think I'm going to wait
[10:55.040 --> 11:01.280]  till her appeal time is over, which I think is tomorrow. And she's got 14 days to put
[11:01.280 --> 11:06.320]  all the documents into this new bankruptcy. So I'm going to wait till she puts those in
[11:06.320 --> 11:11.600]  so we can get her husband's place of work. And then I'm going to bar grieve the attorneys
[11:11.600 --> 11:15.680]  because they should know that she can't do this if they read the order. And if they didn't
[11:15.680 --> 11:25.320]  read the order, then they're negligent. And then I've got to file to lift the stay. Because
[11:25.320 --> 11:32.440]  she only did it because she hates that we got a monetary judgment. Have I lost you?
[11:32.440 --> 11:41.560]  I was just thinking about that. Chapter 13, if you've got some rule or precedent that
[11:41.560 --> 11:49.240]  prevents them from being able to file a Chapter 13, then are you going to tackle that next?
[11:49.240 --> 11:56.240]  Yes, I am. But I'm going to wait till she submits all the other information or the two
[11:56.240 --> 12:02.120]  of them so that we can get the information from the papers that we want to go and collect
[12:02.120 --> 12:07.080]  the judgment. Because they've never divulged where her husband works. They said, oh, we'll
[12:07.080 --> 12:12.560]  come and stalk them so they wouldn't divulge it. She has to in this Chapter 13. So I'm
[12:12.560 --> 12:24.920]  waiting to get the information. Way to go. So it's just more work. And I've got to
[12:24.920 --> 12:28.920]  figure out how to not have to pay the filing fees in that bankruptcy because she's causing
[12:28.920 --> 12:36.800]  us more work, more fees. But I did let the judge know in the NRAP case, I just filed
[12:36.800 --> 12:43.840]  a notice to the court saying, plaintiffs, thank the judge, we received your ruling dated
[12:43.840 --> 12:48.760]  August the 30th and that we received it on the 5th. And just to let the court know that
[12:48.760 --> 12:55.920]  defendants have filed a new Chapter 13 and here attached as the filing. Because he didn't
[12:55.920 --> 13:03.240]  sanction her like we asked because we asked for sanctions because she disobeyed the court.
[13:03.240 --> 13:07.120]  And he thought that, you know, she's already, she doesn't have the money because she's
[13:07.120 --> 13:14.960]  already 400,000 in debt. So maybe he'll rethink that now. I don't know. I might ask him to
[13:14.960 --> 13:19.640]  rethink it. So I'm going to think on that one. So that's that one. That's a success
[13:19.640 --> 13:25.800]  yet. You know, we're not going to get the money yet. Then my new case-
[13:25.800 --> 13:31.280]  That sounds like actually multiple successes in a row. I got to congratulate you on that.
[13:31.280 --> 13:37.280]  I mean, even though they just moved to the finish line, still, that's a lot of successes
[13:37.280 --> 13:40.240]  there. I think you did great.
[13:40.240 --> 13:46.920]  It feels good to do that. The other plaintiffs are really happy that we got it and, you know,
[13:46.920 --> 13:50.920]  they've expressed their thanks that they wouldn't have done it without me because I'm the one
[13:50.920 --> 13:57.280]  who kept putting in the papers and writing them and just researching the law. So yeah,
[13:57.280 --> 14:02.580]  it feels good. Even if we don't get any money out of it, because she's in a criminal case,
[14:02.580 --> 14:08.320]  we might be able to go to the state for compensation. I don't know how that works. I'm looking
[14:08.320 --> 14:15.880]  into it whenever I have a spare minute. But in my appeal case, where I have the same judges
[14:15.880 --> 14:24.600]  as before, when you listened in, they denied me oral argument, denied me the disclosures
[14:24.600 --> 14:32.240]  that I'm entitled to have, denied my request for judicial notice of exhibits to prove the
[14:32.240 --> 14:39.000]  fraud that they've done, that the newly discovered evidence, because they denied me discovery.
[14:39.000 --> 14:45.240]  Then they denied his own disqualification. And even after we submitted eight affidavits,
[14:45.240 --> 14:58.660]  they denied it. So then I filed another thing. So I filed a notice, a complaint with a judicial
[14:58.660 --> 15:04.560]  counsel about it, and then filed that into the court so he would see it because now he's
[15:04.560 --> 15:09.280]  considered retaliating against me because he knows there's an investigation against
[15:09.280 --> 15:10.280]  him.
[15:10.280 --> 15:20.520]  Yes, of course. Randy, did you catch that? She's got eight different affidavits from
[15:20.520 --> 15:26.160]  different people. Well, one is for me, but she's got eight different ones saying why
[15:26.160 --> 15:37.640]  this judge is no good, lousy, rotten, all that. And they're doing nothing.
[15:37.640 --> 15:43.320]  Yeah, he's required to be disqualified if people of reasonable prudence, aware of the
[15:43.320 --> 15:49.480]  fact, believe that I won't get a fair hearing. And so I filed a judicial complaint against
[15:49.480 --> 15:55.480]  the court clerks because I found some finagling on the docket report where they were saying,
[15:55.480 --> 16:00.080]  oh, it was filed on this date. Well, it really wasn't. And then the order came in right
[16:00.080 --> 16:08.280]  at the same time as they said it was filed, all these things. So they took all day before
[16:08.280 --> 16:18.600]  they actually put it in the docket. And then the next morning, it came in that a NUNC pro-tunk
[16:18.600 --> 16:27.400]  changed one of the orders that we'd complained about that was tempered with. But a couple
[16:27.400 --> 16:33.920]  of hours later, because we asked for judicial notice of that complaint and you're running
[16:33.920 --> 16:39.400]  me off the cliff, but I will finish. We asked for judicial notice of it and the judge refused
[16:39.400 --> 16:48.520]  and denied it. Immediately. Wow. All right. Well, we'll continue on the other side. This
[16:48.520 --> 16:56.960]  is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain. You can call in at 512-646-1984.
[16:56.960 --> 17:00.240]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.240 --> 17:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:04.880 --> 17:09.960]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won
[17:09.960 --> 17:15.560]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[17:15.560 --> 17:20.840]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[17:20.840 --> 17:25.560]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and
[17:25.560 --> 17:30.000]  phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial
[17:30.000 --> 17:36.000]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mears proven method is the
[17:36.000 --> 17:40.800]  solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:40.800 --> 17:46.520]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.520 --> 17:57.160]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[17:57.160 --> 18:01.440]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[18:01.440 --> 18:05.800]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[18:05.800 --> 18:11.300]  Word? Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time
[18:11.300 --> 18:16.480]  for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy
[18:16.480 --> 18:22.520]  2.15. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
[18:22.520 --> 18:25.320]  rightly dividing the word of truth.
[18:25.320 --> 18:28.960]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[18:28.960 --> 18:34.360]  verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour topical studies will
[18:34.360 --> 18:39.840]  vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. We wish
[18:39.840 --> 18:44.440]  to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Our goal
[18:44.440 --> 18:49.000]  is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord
[18:49.000 --> 18:55.080]  and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays
[18:55.080 --> 19:00.080]  from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[19:00.080 --> 19:23.080]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com
[19:23.080 --> 19:38.080]  The Logos Radio Network is a production of the Logos Radio Network.
[19:38.080 --> 20:07.080]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rep Fountain, ruler of our radio.
[20:07.080 --> 20:14.400]  The ruler of our radio on this Thursday, the 14th day of September, 2023, and we're talking
[20:14.400 --> 20:17.400]  to tenacious Tina.
[20:17.400 --> 20:22.080]  There we go. Go ahead, Tina.
[20:22.080 --> 20:27.720]  Yeah. Before the break, I was stating that the judge refused to take judicial notice
[20:27.720 --> 20:35.080]  of the complaint we put in about the judge's clerks. He just denied it. So, but he did
[20:35.080 --> 20:39.920]  after, right after that, there was another notice in the court that oral hearing has
[20:39.920 --> 20:46.080]  been set. Funny, he denied it before outright. Now he's set it for oral hearing on October
[20:46.080 --> 20:54.200]  the 11th. Funny, that. And then, so I put in a notice to the court that the fundamental
[20:54.200 --> 20:59.040]  doctrine of fairness has been thrown out the window in this court. Prejudice of the judges
[20:59.040 --> 21:03.360]  are afoot, and the judges and panel of this appellate court are acting in absence of all
[21:03.360 --> 21:08.520]  jurisdiction to rule and are unconstitutionally contravening the will of the people who have
[21:08.520 --> 21:13.280]  spoken and concurred with the appellant and found the judges of this panel guilty of judicial
[21:13.280 --> 21:20.400]  bias, discriminatorily prejudicing the right of the appellant. As on August the 29th, 2023,
[21:20.400 --> 21:26.920]  the people disqualified them pursuant to and in accordance with Canon 3E4C of the Cannons
[21:26.920 --> 21:31.280]  of Judicial Conduct. Judges, you no longer have authority in these proceedings, and therefore
[21:31.280 --> 21:37.400]  you are committing treason, and your impeachment will be at hand, along with all who collaborated
[21:37.400 --> 21:44.040]  with you. And then I put a case site in there, and a few other things. And now we'll see
[21:44.040 --> 21:51.040]  that today I spoke to one of my local Senate, you know, staff members, and I'm putting
[21:51.040 --> 21:56.680]  in a form for them to investigate why this judge should not be removed, or these judges
[21:56.680 --> 22:03.360]  should not be removed from my case. So we'll see where it goes from here.
[22:03.360 --> 22:15.400]  Well, so far, so good. Wins are hard to get. You got a one percenter. I once got a two
[22:15.400 --> 22:19.520]  percenter here in Fort Worth, but you got a one percenter.
[22:19.520 --> 22:26.480]  Yeah, but we just, you know, we still don't have money, but she keeps pouring money into
[22:26.480 --> 22:32.320]  attorneys, so she has money somewhere. She claims she doesn't, but she's getting it
[22:32.320 --> 22:36.240]  to pay them. But I really want to go after the attorneys, because they should have read
[22:36.240 --> 22:45.360]  the order and should know that a Chapter 13 cannot be filed if you disobeyed any of the
[22:45.360 --> 22:53.880]  court orders. So didn't she just lose the Chapter 7?
[22:53.880 --> 23:01.600]  Yes, was denied. So when you file a bankruptcy, there's a
[23:01.600 --> 23:07.760]  time limit before you can file another one, regardless of how the bankruptcy goes.
[23:07.760 --> 23:13.800]  Yeah, but they filed it, and that gives her a 30-day stay. And the interesting part is
[23:13.800 --> 23:20.960]  she filed a Chapter 7 to say she had no money, discharged the debt, and start a clean. Now
[23:20.960 --> 23:27.920]  she's filed a Chapter 13, which is reorganize the debt, because you have assets. Really?
[23:27.920 --> 23:33.880]  How do you do that? How do you suddenly change to a Chapter 13? Because I think she's thinking
[23:33.880 --> 23:40.160]  that she can make some payments, tiny payments, for five years, and if she makes them on time,
[23:40.160 --> 23:45.320]  then the rest of the debts are discharged. But we can file for an exemption for that.
[23:45.320 --> 23:53.200]  But it's not going to get that far, because I'm not going to allow it.
[23:53.200 --> 24:00.800]  You're being what Deborah said on the break. You're being tenacious.
[24:00.800 --> 24:10.760]  Yes. But you know what? Hopefully it gives people a little hope that even though those
[24:10.760 --> 24:16.560]  adversary proceedings are really tough, and if you get an attorney against you, it can
[24:16.560 --> 24:26.220]  be even tougher. But it's worth going after. It's worth the fight, first of all, to learn,
[24:26.220 --> 24:32.620]  but also we have made her life miserable for the last four years. And it's still miserable
[24:32.620 --> 24:35.480]  because she's still going through the criminal case.
[24:35.480 --> 24:44.200]  Yes, you may wind up in prison. So now with the Chapter 13 on reorganization, they will
[24:44.200 --> 24:50.960]  have to disclose the information you haven't been able to get up to this point.
[24:50.960 --> 24:53.540]  Correct.
[24:53.540 --> 24:57.240]  So for them, that may turn out to be a big time oops.
[24:57.240 --> 25:06.680]  Because they refuse to give her husband's place of work. And they know that once we
[25:06.680 --> 25:13.880]  got this judgment, we would go and attach their wages. And we'd call them in for a
[25:13.880 --> 25:19.520]  hearing on what their assets were and the bank accounts, because you can call them in
[25:19.520 --> 25:26.200]  for a discovery hearing. She knows that we'll do that. So this is her desperate attempt
[25:26.200 --> 25:35.680]  to get another 30 days. Because she hired a big law firm, you know, out of LA. So I'm
[25:35.680 --> 25:40.560]  not afraid of them. And they will get a bar grievance right off the bat as soon as I've
[25:40.560 --> 25:43.160]  got that information I want.
[25:43.160 --> 25:47.640]  A bar grievance? Some, some bar grievance.
[25:47.640 --> 25:52.960]  Okay, I'll find a few then. I'll look for a few of them. And I think I'll file against
[25:52.960 --> 25:59.120]  the whole firm because it's, you know, it's one attorney, but they notified four or five
[25:59.120 --> 26:05.480]  other attorneys of the notice of bankruptcy. I saw that they'd, you know, cc'd all the
[26:05.480 --> 26:09.360]  other attorneys in the firm. So I'll just grieve them all.
[26:09.360 --> 26:17.040]  Every name, every name that appears should get one. In my case, I got a filing by a attorney
[26:17.040 --> 26:24.880]  from the attorney general's office. And his name was at the bottom. Above his name were
[26:24.880 --> 26:31.620]  five other individuals. One was the acting attorney general because our current attorney
[26:31.620 --> 26:37.140]  general Paxton is being impeached right now. They're trying to impeach him. So we have
[26:37.140 --> 26:43.160]  an acting attorney general. And then we had four levels of management below her. And then
[26:43.160 --> 26:52.240]  we have this little attorney. I bar grieved all of them. A bunch of, for every document
[26:52.240 --> 26:57.600]  they filed, I bar grieved every one of them. So that's about eight or nine bar grievances
[26:57.600 --> 27:00.720]  for each one.
[27:00.720 --> 27:10.360]  So I got another motion to, to dismiss because I'm a, Brett, can I say asshole on the air?
[27:10.360 --> 27:17.040]  I don't think I can. No. Okay. So I won't say that on the air. Say something about rumpus
[27:17.040 --> 27:19.560]  or something like that.
[27:19.560 --> 27:25.440]  Okay. Anal sphincter. There we go. He said they should dismiss the case because I was
[27:25.440 --> 27:34.840]  an anal sphincter. It had no law. It had no statute, no case law. Just somehow they got
[27:34.840 --> 27:40.920]  a letter from that I sent an email I sent sent to my mayor. And because I told the mayor,
[27:40.920 --> 27:48.600]  I filed this for practice that they should throw it out. Well, that's absolutely nonsense.
[27:48.600 --> 27:54.840]  Well, if he doesn't bring any facts in law, isn't that what you call frivolous? Don't
[27:54.840 --> 27:56.880]  people get in trouble for that?
[27:56.880 --> 28:05.480]  Well, this was the chief justice of the Texas Supreme. I don't think he had anything to
[28:05.480 --> 28:14.840]  do with that. I mean, he may be dumb, but he didn't get to be the chief justice by being
[28:14.840 --> 28:23.720]  dumber than the dumbest. I think this lawyer on the bottom of that list got his behind
[28:23.720 --> 28:32.200]  reamed really big time when all his bosses got bargrieved into the Stone Age, to quote
[28:32.200 --> 28:35.840]  Scott Richardson.
[28:35.840 --> 28:42.360]  And they chewed him out. So he was furious at me and I'm just too bit pro se. So he put
[28:42.360 --> 28:50.440]  this together to try to punish me. I suspect the chief of police in the town I live in
[28:50.440 --> 28:56.120]  or the mayor, it's probably the chief of police that contacted him to investigate into me.
[28:56.120 --> 29:03.600]  Or they contacted them to look into this lawsuit that I filed. And in the process, they found
[29:03.600 --> 29:11.280]  out that I'd sent this email to the mayor and the attorney general got it and used it
[29:11.280 --> 29:26.680]  to try to get my case thrown out. So you really can't get to them. And these guys, the attorneys
[29:26.680 --> 29:35.000]  themselves, I intend to go after all of them. And that's what you should do. Bargrieve
[29:35.000 --> 29:44.960]  every attorney for what the one guy did and then sue them all. It doesn't matter if you
[29:44.960 --> 29:51.720]  win or not. In my case, I don't expect to win at the end of the day. I expect them to
[29:51.720 --> 29:57.120]  come to the table. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We'll be
[29:57.120 --> 30:01.840]  right back.
[30:01.840 --> 30:20.240]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:20.240 --> 30:25.840]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.840 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:32.000 --> 30:37.160]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[30:37.160 --> 30:45.120]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.120 --> 30:49.880]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:49.880 --> 30:54.880]  your personal information. But what happens if it escapes their control? It's not an
[30:54.880 --> 31:00.240]  easy question. According to a recent survey, a shocking 90 percent of U.S. companies admit
[31:00.240 --> 31:04.840]  their security was breached by hackers in the last year. That's one more reason you
[31:04.840 --> 31:10.040]  should trust your searches to Startpage.com. Unlike other search engines, Startpage doesn't
[31:10.040 --> 31:14.440]  store any data on you. They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would
[31:14.440 --> 31:19.360]  be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare. Too bad other companies don't
[31:19.360 --> 31:21.000]  treat your data the same way.
[31:21.000 --> 31:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:51.000 --> 32:14.200]  We're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right
[32:14.200 --> 32:17.480]  to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.480 --> 32:21.560]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[32:21.560 --> 32:25.680]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.680 --> 32:29.620]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.620 --> 32:33.400]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.400 --> 32:37.400]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable
[32:37.400 --> 32:41.560]  material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now
[32:41.560 --> 32:45.040]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus
[32:45.040 --> 32:49.440]  the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and
[32:49.440 --> 32:52.680]  other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of
[32:52.680 --> 32:57.160]  this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the
[32:57.160 --> 33:01.000]  free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.000 --> 33:06.480]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:06.480 --> 33:21.480]  Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the line to hand. Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:21.480 --> 33:34.480]  I don't understand. Your job is to protect and to serve. Not beat and abuse. Officer!
[33:34.480 --> 33:57.420]  When you're going to stop abuse, your power? When you're going to stop abuse, your power?
[33:57.420 --> 34:01.560]  When you're going to stop abuse, your power? When you're going to stop abuse, your power?
[34:01.560 --> 34:02.560]  Okay.
[34:02.560 --> 34:03.560]  We are back.
[34:03.560 --> 34:10.440]  Randy Kelton, Rhett Fowlin, The Root of La Radio on this Thursday, the 14th day of September
[34:10.440 --> 34:13.440]  2023.
[34:13.440 --> 34:17.680]  And we're talking to teenagers Tina.
[34:17.680 --> 34:23.200]  So what is on the horizon for you now?
[34:23.200 --> 34:30.760]  Well, I've just got to wait my time out for the bankruptcy to go through with ritual and
[34:30.760 --> 34:32.040]  work on stuff.
[34:32.040 --> 34:37.840]  The appeal case, I'm trying to get these judges off before the hearing and get some others.
[34:37.840 --> 34:45.240]  But I wanted to ask you too, because they put in, by the way, they said the through
[34:45.240 --> 34:50.040]  when about the order when they changed it non-pro-tongue, they put through inadvertence
[34:50.040 --> 34:51.880]  and clerical error.
[34:51.880 --> 34:57.440]  The court's order dated August 29th read as follows, and then it said it should have read
[34:57.440 --> 34:58.440]  as follows.
[34:58.440 --> 35:01.720]  This order is hereby corrected non-pro-tongue.
[35:01.720 --> 35:02.720]  The motion is denied.
[35:02.720 --> 35:04.840]  It wasn't even a motion.
[35:04.840 --> 35:05.840]  Okay.
[35:05.840 --> 35:12.000]  Non-pro-tongue means that it is just clerical and not substantive.
[35:12.000 --> 35:13.000]  Yes.
[35:13.000 --> 35:24.280]  So there's nothing in the motion or order of substance that was changed, just typos.
[35:24.280 --> 35:28.280]  But you know, they're messing with the docket, that's okay.
[35:28.280 --> 35:32.720]  I know what they're trying to do, and at least we got them to change it cuz they know we're
[35:32.720 --> 35:33.720]  on to them.
[35:33.720 --> 35:42.720]  I wanted to know, can I put anything of this in the public, I mean, it's in the public
[35:42.720 --> 35:50.000]  in one way because it's on the record, but can I put a Facebook page or something like
[35:50.000 --> 35:55.920]  that showing all these misdemeanors and problems with this case?
[35:55.920 --> 35:56.920]  Is that a-
[35:56.920 --> 35:59.440]  Absolutely, yes, you can.
[35:59.440 --> 36:00.800]  Okay.
[36:00.800 --> 36:04.080]  This is public, and it's absolutely public.
[36:04.080 --> 36:05.080]  Okay.
[36:05.080 --> 36:11.240]  Now, the only time you can't is if they sealed the records, but then you couldn't see them
[36:11.240 --> 36:14.520]  anyway unless you were a litigant.
[36:14.520 --> 36:18.120]  But if they're public, they're public, do anything you want to with them.
[36:18.120 --> 36:24.920]  You can't use it as admissible evidence, like to prove those facts that are asserted, the
[36:24.920 --> 36:30.080]  facts that get listed up and posted somewhere, they're not automatically evidence cuz you
[36:30.080 --> 36:31.080]  don't know who wrote them.
[36:31.080 --> 36:34.480]  They could be tampered with somewhere along the way.
[36:34.480 --> 36:43.920]  But you can state that, as of this date, Facebook says this, and that's a fact.
[36:43.920 --> 36:44.920]  Yeah.
[36:44.920 --> 36:45.920]  Okay.
[36:45.920 --> 36:51.320]  Yeah, I just thought it might as well get it out that the people are going to read what
[36:51.320 --> 36:57.040]  this just like, the judge is obviously upset that I'm doing this, and that I've let him
[36:57.040 --> 37:03.480]  know that he's been investigated, and now he's retaliating, and we used his own words
[37:03.480 --> 37:05.080]  against him.
[37:05.080 --> 37:10.240]  But I just thought, let's put it out in the public and see what we can do, because I am
[37:10.240 --> 37:16.760]  going after him on criminal charges, and then I'm trying to get with the grand jury up here.
[37:16.760 --> 37:18.360]  So I'm just gonna-
[37:18.360 --> 37:21.640]  I wouldn't say that you're using his words against him.
[37:21.640 --> 37:26.120]  I would say that you brought his own words to his attention, and he still defied justice.
[37:26.120 --> 37:28.680]  That's a good way to do it.
[37:28.680 --> 37:29.680]  I like that.
[37:29.680 --> 37:30.680]  Yes.
[37:30.680 --> 37:38.760]  Yeah, and put it on, set you up a YouTube channel if you don't have one, and put it
[37:38.760 --> 37:49.000]  on the channel, and then copy the link to it, and use that link in some document that
[37:49.000 --> 37:52.360]  he will see.
[37:52.360 --> 37:54.400]  That'll make him nuts.
[37:54.400 --> 38:00.320]  Remember a video of this cop, this fat cop in shorts.
[38:00.320 --> 38:07.440]  He looked absolutely ridiculous harassing these look like 12 or 13 year old kids on
[38:07.440 --> 38:09.400]  skateboards.
[38:09.400 --> 38:14.280]  One of them's got his phone out, and the cop turns to him and says, I better not see this
[38:14.280 --> 38:15.280]  on YouTube.
[38:15.280 --> 38:22.340]  Well, that's where I saw it was on YouTube.
[38:22.340 --> 38:27.920]  So YouTube is a really sore spot for him.
[38:27.920 --> 38:37.000]  And in that regard, YouTube's great, because it's one of the biggest clubs you can wave
[38:37.000 --> 38:38.000]  at them.
[38:38.000 --> 38:39.000]  Okay.
[38:39.000 --> 38:42.760]  Well, I'm going to have to see if I can do this.
[38:42.760 --> 38:49.720]  Now what he can't tell is how many hits that YouTube channel's got on it, but all he knows
[38:49.720 --> 38:56.860]  is it's up on YouTube for everybody to look at.
[38:56.860 --> 38:59.880]  Technology is developing a way of balancing things out.
[38:59.880 --> 39:07.280]  Well, then I'll have to work on figuring out how to do that.
[39:07.280 --> 39:10.440]  Oh, that'd be wonderful.
[39:10.440 --> 39:12.720]  Just get in front of it.
[39:12.720 --> 39:18.520]  If you've got a camera on your computer, just rip him a new one.
[39:18.520 --> 39:21.740]  And then post it.
[39:21.740 --> 39:22.740]  That will be fun.
[39:22.740 --> 39:23.740]  I'll also do that.
[39:23.740 --> 39:29.160]  Just be careful that you don't say anything that's false, that then they can turn around
[39:29.160 --> 39:33.400]  and blame you for slander or whatever.
[39:33.400 --> 39:41.080]  Just keep it all, either say the facts or say, I believe or stuff like that.
[39:41.080 --> 39:42.760]  In my humble opinion.
[39:42.760 --> 39:43.760]  Yeah.
[39:43.760 --> 39:51.040]  Well, if he's written something, if the attorney wrote something and signed that letter, I
[39:51.040 --> 39:57.280]  can read exactly what that attorney wrote and say, yeah, exactly, attorney wrote and
[39:57.280 --> 40:02.560]  signed this and then he decided he wasn't going to do what he promised to do.
[40:02.560 --> 40:08.880]  That is, according to the law, attorney deceit, but now they are trying to use litigation
[40:08.880 --> 40:18.120]  privilege to say they were allowed to lie and it doesn't apply to attorney deceit.
[40:18.120 --> 40:24.320]  What you might consider doing is going, were you in the federal court on this?
[40:24.320 --> 40:25.320]  No.
[40:25.320 --> 40:32.200]  Okay, so then go to the state website and see if you can look up all the cases this
[40:32.200 --> 40:35.960]  attorney has.
[40:35.960 --> 40:44.760]  Open the case and find the litigant and send an email leak to the litigant or to the opposing
[40:44.760 --> 40:48.520]  party.
[40:48.520 --> 40:49.520]  That sounds devious.
[40:49.520 --> 40:54.360]  It is devious, but it's funny.
[40:54.360 --> 40:57.000]  I like devious.
[40:57.000 --> 41:03.080]  One thing you can't do with the truth is you can't slander.
[41:03.080 --> 41:05.080]  That's true.
[41:05.080 --> 41:07.640]  I only have the truth.
[41:07.640 --> 41:09.440]  They're the ones that keep lying.
[41:09.440 --> 41:15.880]  They're the ones that said in their reply brief, appellant knew the extent of the fraud.
[41:15.880 --> 41:16.880]  Really?
[41:16.880 --> 41:22.320]  You actually said that in your reply brief that I knew the extent of the fraud, but you're
[41:22.320 --> 41:27.360]  claiming you didn't defraud me, but you just said I knew the extent of it.
[41:27.360 --> 41:30.080]  How does that happen?
[41:30.080 --> 41:35.840]  Yeah, there's a special legal term for that.
[41:35.840 --> 41:43.080]  It's called judicial estoppel.
[41:43.080 --> 41:51.360]  If they put something in a court document, they put a statement of fact in a court document,
[41:51.360 --> 41:54.320]  it becomes fact.
[41:54.320 --> 41:58.560]  And they can't unstate it and they can't contradict it elsewhere.
[41:58.560 --> 42:06.400]  So when they put this letter in that said, you knew at the time these statements were
[42:06.400 --> 42:12.000]  made by McGinnity that we had no intention of following through.
[42:12.000 --> 42:18.480]  Then the fact that he lied to the court and had no intention of following through becomes
[42:18.480 --> 42:25.160]  an incontrovertible fact that he cannot argue against later.
[42:25.160 --> 42:30.080]  Yeah, he ought to have a criminal complaint hanging over his head already about that.
[42:30.080 --> 42:32.120]  Well, that's coming.
[42:32.120 --> 42:38.760]  I just don't have enough hours in the day right now to do it all, but-
[42:38.760 --> 42:43.960]  This is the kind of thing to get in front of a California grand jury.
[42:43.960 --> 42:45.160]  Yes.
[42:45.160 --> 42:54.280]  A California grand jury, unlike Texas, can investigate into anything they want to.
[42:54.280 --> 43:01.800]  I had two clients in California, two gay guys that owned a strip club that the sheriff's
[43:01.800 --> 43:10.640]  department was coming after, and that's how I got the sheriff to back away from them.
[43:10.640 --> 43:15.320]  So it works.
[43:15.320 --> 43:20.360]  Well, that's one way I'll have to do it because they've outright admitted three times in their
[43:20.360 --> 43:26.720]  reply brief that I knew the extent of the fraud, that I knew that they had no intention
[43:26.720 --> 43:27.720]  of following through.
[43:27.720 --> 43:32.720]  And then I accused them of fraud, but they didn't commit it, but then they admit they
[43:32.720 --> 43:33.720]  did.
[43:33.720 --> 43:40.720]  Yeah, well, when I was in California, I just mentioned taking this to the California grand
[43:40.720 --> 43:45.440]  jury, and the sheriff's department made these guys a deal right away.
[43:45.440 --> 43:48.720]  They did not want the grand jury to look at this.
[43:48.720 --> 43:51.400]  It was the Brentwood agreement.
[43:51.400 --> 43:52.400]  Hang on.
[43:52.400 --> 44:00.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:01.000]  I love logos.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.280]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.280 --> 44:07.200]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:07.200 --> 44:08.200]  I need my truth fixed.
[44:08.200 --> 44:13.080]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:13.080 --> 44:16.840]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[44:16.840 --> 44:20.240]  have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[44:20.240 --> 44:21.720]  How can I help logos?
[44:21.720 --> 44:23.760]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:23.760 --> 44:26.560]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[44:26.560 --> 44:29.160]  You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.160 --> 44:31.280]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.280 --> 44:37.400]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.400 --> 44:43.280]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.280 --> 44:44.280]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.280 --> 44:45.280]  No.
[44:45.280 --> 44:46.880]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:46.880 --> 44:47.880]  No.
[44:47.880 --> 44:48.880]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:48.880 --> 44:49.880]  No.
[44:49.880 --> 44:50.880]  I mean, yes.
[44:50.880 --> 44:51.880]  Wow.
[44:51.880 --> 44:54.160]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[44:54.160 --> 44:55.720]  This is perfect.
[44:55.720 --> 44:56.720]  Thank you so much.
[44:56.720 --> 44:58.440]  You're welcome.
[44:58.440 --> 45:01.160]  Happy holidays, logos.
[45:01.160 --> 45:04.360]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.360 --> 45:11.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.120 --> 45:14.960]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.960 --> 45:19.320]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.320 --> 45:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.120 --> 45:27.960]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[45:27.960 --> 45:34.720]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.720 --> 45:39.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.200 --> 45:43.560]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.560 --> 45:49.720]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.720 --> 45:52.320]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.320 --> 46:00.280]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[46:22.320 --> 46:29.920]  Okay, we are back.
[46:29.920 --> 46:32.360]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:32.360 --> 46:34.760]  Okay, Tina, we really need to get going.
[46:34.760 --> 46:43.360]  We got a full board of callers, but you did good for a girl.
[46:43.360 --> 46:45.760]  We got her muted.
[46:45.760 --> 46:49.160]  You must have, yeah, because I don't think she'd let you get away with saying that on
[46:49.160 --> 46:50.160]  the air.
[46:50.160 --> 46:51.160]  I don't think so.
[46:51.160 --> 46:55.840]  I don't know if that'll rump us, but you can't be one.
[46:55.840 --> 46:56.840]  No.
[46:56.840 --> 46:57.840]  Okay.
[46:57.840 --> 46:58.840]  You're on.
[46:58.840 --> 47:01.840]  Thanks for everything.
[47:01.840 --> 47:02.840]  Bye.
[47:02.840 --> 47:10.680]  Okay, Tina, do you have anything else for us?
[47:10.680 --> 47:12.680]  I think she's out.
[47:12.680 --> 47:16.080]  Yeah, I guess so.
[47:16.080 --> 47:17.080]  Okay.
[47:17.080 --> 47:20.520]  We don't have any first time callers.
[47:20.520 --> 47:24.080]  Okay, so we're going to Roger in Wisconsin.
[47:24.080 --> 47:26.080]  Hello, Roger.
[47:26.080 --> 47:30.640]  I used to live in Illinois, so I speak Yankee, so we can understand you.
[47:30.640 --> 47:32.640]  What do you have for us today?
[47:32.640 --> 47:36.680]  Yeah, howdy, Randy and Brett.
[47:36.680 --> 47:43.920]  We're both from the same old neighborhood, you know, the near north side.
[47:43.920 --> 47:44.920]  Wait a minute.
[47:44.920 --> 47:47.640]  Just a matter of form.
[47:47.640 --> 47:50.720]  Randy should never say howdy.
[47:50.720 --> 47:57.000]  Well, yeah, I just wondered, how did you get such a...but then you said you actually grew
[47:57.000 --> 48:00.560]  up in Tennessee or Kentucky or something.
[48:00.560 --> 48:03.560]  How do you get...
[48:03.560 --> 48:09.720]  Yeah, I used to stand in Tennessee and urinate in Kentucky, and we were right on the state
[48:09.720 --> 48:10.720]  line.
[48:10.720 --> 48:11.720]  Yeah.
[48:11.720 --> 48:14.720]  What, every three hours?
[48:14.720 --> 48:20.440]  That's what I do now, but I wasn't this old then.
[48:20.440 --> 48:26.120]  Yeah, so anyways, to get on some kind of a course...
[48:26.120 --> 48:27.480]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[48:27.480 --> 48:29.680]  Are you on a hands-free device?
[48:29.680 --> 48:32.880]  I'll turn off the speakerphone.
[48:32.880 --> 48:33.880]  I'm sorry.
[48:33.880 --> 48:34.880]  Let's see.
[48:34.880 --> 48:40.480]  It was either that or you had your head in the toilet.
[48:40.480 --> 48:44.280]  Oh, could you...is it better now?
[48:44.280 --> 48:46.720]  Yeah, it's better now.
[48:46.720 --> 48:56.480]  Okay, so I remember on many shows, you mentioned secreting of documents.
[48:56.480 --> 48:57.480]  And...
[48:57.480 --> 48:58.480]  Wait a minute.
[48:58.480 --> 48:59.480]  I didn't get that.
[48:59.480 --> 49:02.320]  You kind of broke up a little bit there.
[49:02.320 --> 49:03.320]  Okay.
[49:03.320 --> 49:07.680]  I'm going to get off the speakerphone.
[49:07.680 --> 49:11.120]  He's still on the speakerphone?
[49:11.120 --> 49:14.280]  Deborah, you're back there listening.
[49:14.280 --> 49:15.280]  He's on the speakerphone.
[49:15.280 --> 49:16.280]  Deborah, come get him.
[49:16.280 --> 49:17.280]  He needs to get punished.
[49:17.280 --> 49:18.280]  We will stick our producer on you.
[49:18.280 --> 49:19.280]  You ain't lived until you had her after you.
[49:19.280 --> 49:20.280]  Oh boy, now you're going to get her after you.
[49:20.280 --> 49:21.280]  You got a point there.
[49:21.280 --> 49:22.280]  Okay, Roger, go ahead.
[49:22.280 --> 49:23.280]  Yeah, so...
[49:23.280 --> 49:24.280]  No.
[49:24.280 --> 49:44.680]  Kyle, Deborah, I love her lead, guitar leads and everything, if that was her on certain
[49:44.680 --> 49:45.680]  songs.
[49:45.680 --> 49:52.560]  But anyways, I remember you mentioning the secreting of...
[49:52.560 --> 49:59.120]  I'm going to tell you, sucking up, not going to help.
[49:59.120 --> 50:01.120]  I believe that too.
[50:01.120 --> 50:02.120]  Okay.
[50:02.120 --> 50:06.640]  Didn't you have a traffic issue?
[50:06.640 --> 50:15.360]  Oh, that's 321th Blucel back in the good old days in Chicago with my 69 Dodge Chargers
[50:15.360 --> 50:19.760]  and those types of muscle cars.
[50:19.760 --> 50:29.520]  No, I've got real good traffic record, but this does pertain to being a shuttle driver,
[50:29.520 --> 50:37.120]  but with the management of this company that I was working with.
[50:37.120 --> 50:42.920]  The question was, secreting of documents, does that only apply to court actions or does
[50:42.920 --> 50:47.760]  it also apply to a corporate hearing meeting?
[50:47.760 --> 50:50.760]  Wait, I didn't get this.
[50:50.760 --> 50:51.760]  What apply?
[50:51.760 --> 50:53.040]  You broke up a little bit.
[50:53.040 --> 50:56.280]  Secreting of documents, he said.
[50:56.280 --> 50:57.280]  Secreting of documents.
[50:57.280 --> 50:58.280]  Okay.
[50:58.280 --> 51:08.640]  It applies to law, but as to corporate, it depends.
[51:08.640 --> 51:16.600]  If the secreting of documents didn't hurt anything, then no harm, no foul.
[51:16.600 --> 51:29.320]  If there were corporate rules, then it could go to breach of contract, but it's not a crime.
[51:29.320 --> 51:36.040]  If you were harmed in some way by that, then you would use that, whatever harm that was,
[51:36.040 --> 51:39.880]  you would use that cause of action and just describe that the documents were secreted
[51:39.880 --> 51:44.960]  or something, but it wouldn't be the actual secreting of documents like it is for a public
[51:44.960 --> 51:47.160]  official or for a government agency.
[51:47.160 --> 51:48.160]  Okay.
[51:48.160 --> 51:51.160]  That's a good explanation.
[51:51.160 --> 52:04.640]  This happened in a closet, unscheduled meeting, like a mandatory meeting by a new general
[52:04.640 --> 52:12.080]  manager and all that, and the first thing I asked him was, is this hearing pending any
[52:12.080 --> 52:21.720]  termination or whatever, because I had mentioned a potential OSHA violation to a maintenance
[52:21.720 --> 52:29.280]  manager and this sparked a bunch of behind the scenes things that went on.
[52:29.280 --> 52:40.480]  I just filed the complaint and they responded right away and got in touch with me within
[52:40.480 --> 52:48.840]  the next day and I noticed there was two, he explained there was two separate ways of
[52:48.840 --> 52:49.840]  doing it.
[52:49.840 --> 52:55.320]  One of them was under the whistleblower act and then the other one was, I guess the one
[52:55.320 --> 53:02.040]  with the whistleblower act falls, you know, mentioned a personal injury attached and then
[53:02.040 --> 53:13.720]  the other one was just basically from reporting a potential hazard or whatever, you know.
[53:13.720 --> 53:15.720]  Okay.
[53:15.720 --> 53:19.960]  And was there some retaliation as a result of that?
[53:19.960 --> 53:28.960]  Well, you know, that's why I asked, you know, what is the purpose of this mandatory meeting
[53:28.960 --> 53:41.400]  and then they were trying to badger and they brought forth misleading information and complaints
[53:41.400 --> 53:45.080]  that were unfounded or whatever.
[53:45.080 --> 53:52.280]  And I just faced, Benny had this document and I said, well, I probably refuse to sign
[53:52.280 --> 54:01.360]  and then I would have written underneath it in parentheses, UTDC and then the other question
[54:01.360 --> 54:07.400]  I had for you is, can you also put an additional C for conspiracy?
[54:07.400 --> 54:14.960]  Wait a minute, a C for conspiracy?
[54:14.960 --> 54:15.960]  C.
[54:15.960 --> 54:23.680]  He's talking about something that he would add to his signature, UTDC to indicate under
[54:23.680 --> 54:31.320]  threat duress coercion and wondering if he can add another C to mean conspiracy.
[54:31.320 --> 54:32.320]  Okay.
[54:32.320 --> 54:33.320]  That doesn't mean anything.
[54:33.320 --> 54:38.520]  I know a lot of these patriot guys talk about that, but it doesn't mean anything.
[54:38.520 --> 54:42.720]  If you were under threat of coercion, you were under threat of coercion.
[54:42.720 --> 54:51.480]  You don't have to document it behind your signature and putting that behind your signature,
[54:51.480 --> 54:56.680]  unless you wrote the whole thing out, especially if you use an acronym, the acronym could be
[54:56.680 --> 54:58.320]  anything.
[54:58.320 --> 55:03.640]  So where you sign a document, you just sign a document.
[55:03.640 --> 55:10.240]  Well, I refuse to sign.
[55:10.240 --> 55:13.800]  And if you refuse to sign it, just refuse to sign it.
[55:13.800 --> 55:21.880]  But all this patriot mythology about putting all rights reserved, UCC 209 and all that
[55:21.880 --> 55:24.880]  stuff, it's meaningless.
[55:24.880 --> 55:33.200]  Oh, well, thank you very much for, so I don't embarrass myself as far as that goes.
[55:33.200 --> 55:40.600]  So otherwise you would write it out in entirety, right?
[55:40.600 --> 55:43.920]  Or just write refused.
[55:43.920 --> 55:47.380]  Or if you're scared for your life, you're afraid that you're going to get beat up or
[55:47.380 --> 55:50.280]  thrown in jail or something if you don't sign it.
[55:50.280 --> 55:57.480]  Well, I've signed before with just the B of my first name followed by refused, all in
[55:57.480 --> 56:02.800]  kind of a flowy cursive and there you go.
[56:02.800 --> 56:11.040]  Well, I question whether it was a retaliatory meeting or hearing or whatever.
[56:11.040 --> 56:15.320]  I don't even, it was mandatory, whatever it was.
[56:15.320 --> 56:18.440]  Who did you file the complaints with?
[56:18.440 --> 56:21.120]  OSHA.
[56:21.120 --> 56:23.880]  And then contact OSHA.
[56:23.880 --> 56:28.280]  I did.
[56:28.280 --> 56:32.560]  And tell them that you're concerned that you're being retaliated against.
[56:32.560 --> 56:33.560]  What did they tell you?
[56:33.560 --> 56:40.080]  Well, they sent me a letter stating that, like I heard you say also, like you've become
[56:40.080 --> 56:42.680]  a protected class and...
[56:42.680 --> 56:46.640]  Except you don't feel very protected.
[56:46.640 --> 56:50.240]  What are they going to do?
[56:50.240 --> 57:03.680]  That if I notice anything of retaliation or I guess if they were discriminating against
[57:03.680 --> 57:08.520]  a person or something to contact them within 30 days.
[57:08.520 --> 57:17.800]  So that's the statute of limitations with OSHA on such a filing of the initial complaint.
[57:17.800 --> 57:24.040]  If you want to get a good feel for how that works, right now Ken Paxton, the attorney
[57:24.040 --> 57:31.160]  general from Texas is being impeached in the Texas legislature.
[57:31.160 --> 57:37.320]  And one of the issues was retaliation.
[57:37.320 --> 57:41.480]  And you might look at, you know, if you can get some of the archives of those hearings
[57:41.480 --> 57:48.520]  that were just held yesterday and the day before, you can see how they addressed where
[57:48.520 --> 57:57.960]  some of his people turned him in to someone and then within 30 days he fired them.
[57:57.960 --> 58:01.120]  And in Texas, they couldn't fire him for 90 days.
[58:01.120 --> 58:03.600]  They couldn't do anything.
[58:03.600 --> 58:05.920]  And they addressed exactly this issue.
[58:05.920 --> 58:11.880]  So it just followed under labor law?
[58:11.880 --> 58:16.720]  Wait, say that again?
[58:16.720 --> 58:19.960]  You referring to labor law, even though it's not all...
[58:19.960 --> 58:20.960]  Yes.
[58:20.960 --> 58:25.200]  Well, it was Texas law, but it'll tell you how they addressed this issue.
[58:25.200 --> 58:31.680]  Texas law said they couldn't, that if they were fired or disciplined or anything within
[58:31.680 --> 58:40.280]  90 days after blowing the whistle, it was presumed to be retaliatory.
[58:40.280 --> 58:50.280]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[58:50.280 --> 58:55.700]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.700 --> 58:58.520]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.520 --> 59:03.900]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.900 --> 59:07.160]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.160 --> 59:09.040]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.040 --> 59:14.840]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.840 --> 59:18.600]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.600 --> 59:23.560]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.560 --> 59:28.280]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.280 --> 59:33.400]  Those from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.400 --> 59:43.840]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.840 --> 59:47.880]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.880 --> 59:48.880]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.880 --> 59:57.880]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[59:57.880 --> 01:00:05.960]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution.
[01:00:05.960 --> 01:00:09.400]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.400 --> 01:00:10.880]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.880 --> 01:00:14.780]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:14.780 --> 01:00:17.640]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.640 --> 01:00:19.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.240 --> 01:00:22.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.840 --> 01:00:27.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.600 --> 01:00:32.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.760 --> 01:00:35.360]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.360 --> 01:00:39.660]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search
[01:00:39.660 --> 01:00:43.200]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.200 --> 01:00:46.640]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.640 --> 01:00:49.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:52.080]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.080 --> 01:00:55.280]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.280 --> 01:00:59.440]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment
[01:00:59.440 --> 01:01:01.020]  was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.020 --> 01:01:05.240]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[01:01:05.240 --> 01:01:07.360]  the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:09.040]  Third party, Third Amendment?
[01:01:09.040 --> 01:01:10.040]  Get it?
[01:01:10.040 --> 01:01:13.520]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them
[01:01:13.520 --> 01:01:17.040]  to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.040 --> 01:01:18.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.840 --> 01:01:32.040]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.040 --> 01:01:35.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.680 --> 01:01:39.160]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.160 --> 01:01:40.640]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.640 --> 01:01:44.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.520 --> 01:01:47.500]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.500 --> 01:01:49.080]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.080 --> 01:01:52.680]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.680 --> 01:01:57.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.440 --> 01:02:02.640]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.640 --> 01:02:05.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.200 --> 01:02:09.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:02:09.500 --> 01:02:13.040]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:13.040 --> 01:02:16.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.760 --> 01:02:22.080]  Find four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.080 --> 01:02:26.560]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable
[01:02:26.560 --> 01:02:28.040]  search and seizure.
[01:02:28.040 --> 01:02:30.420]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you?
[01:02:30.420 --> 01:02:31.420]  Get it?
[01:02:31.420 --> 01:02:34.520]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of
[01:02:34.520 --> 01:02:35.520]  security.
[01:02:35.520 --> 01:02:40.040]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.040 --> 01:02:44.080]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say
[01:02:44.080 --> 01:02:47.120]  it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.120 --> 01:02:51.200]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly
[01:02:51.200 --> 01:02:53.360]  eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.360 --> 01:02:55.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.240 --> 01:03:24.080]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:26.240 --> 01:03:33.120]  I want to say, chant for our words to say, or let me tell them, chant down by all, chant
[01:03:33.120 --> 01:03:42.840]  down by all, chant for justice and, chant for justice, chant for our words to say,
[01:03:42.840 --> 01:03:45.160]  chant for our words to say.
[01:03:45.160 --> 01:03:55.880]  One of them, when we chant, when we say, say, all man was created equally, chant down Babylon
[01:03:55.880 --> 01:04:00.920]  and do it daily, and when night come, pray for everybody, say, one by one, we have to
[01:04:00.920 --> 01:04:08.040]  chant them, man, we chant down Babylon because Babylon is wrong, the only right man, we say,
[01:04:08.040 --> 01:04:14.760]  is the rest, come on, we take, we say, Lord, man, the Fourth Amendment, to chant down Babylon
[01:04:14.760 --> 01:04:21.560]  now, not later, to let Babylon know, say, we getting greater, we fight the donkeys,
[01:04:21.560 --> 01:04:29.960]  we say, truth, yella-lee, say, Jesus Christ shall rescue him, no, chant down by one by
[01:04:29.960 --> 01:04:40.520]  one, chant for justice and, chant for justice and peace, chant for our words to release,
[01:04:40.520 --> 01:04:45.720]  man, we're in the business with them, say, I mean, nothing's worth it, I want to speak
[01:04:45.720 --> 01:04:46.720]  for my family.
[01:04:46.720 --> 01:04:47.720]  Okay, we are back.
[01:04:47.720 --> 01:04:50.680]  Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, LudoVlog Radio, and we were a little longer coming in.
[01:04:50.680 --> 01:04:58.120]  It's on this, okay, I forgot to give the date, it's the top of the hour, so it is the 14th
[01:04:58.120 --> 01:05:09.840]  day of September, 2023, and we were having a discussion about beer on the break.
[01:05:09.840 --> 01:05:13.080]  And we tried to keep it to only the important subjects, right?
[01:05:13.080 --> 01:05:19.240]  The really important subjects, which brings up a really important subject, Randy's Beer
[01:05:19.240 --> 01:05:20.240]  Fund.
[01:05:20.240 --> 01:05:24.080]  Oh, Randy's Beer Fund is pitiful.
[01:05:24.080 --> 01:05:34.360]  I mentioned that after this Bud Light fiasco, that Bud Light lost its position as the best-selling
[01:05:34.360 --> 01:05:40.920]  beer in the country, and the beer that took its place, I was surprised, it's actually
[01:05:40.920 --> 01:05:51.480]  my favorite beer, was the Modelo, and that the Mexican beers were getting much more popular.
[01:05:51.480 --> 01:06:02.040]  And that reminded me of Randy's Beer Fund, and Debra wants me to tell you that that stuff
[01:06:02.040 --> 01:06:06.840]  they make, Bud Light and all that, it's not really beer, they don't brew it anymore,
[01:06:06.840 --> 01:06:14.920]  they just put in these different chemicals to give it flavor, color, and throw in a little
[01:06:14.920 --> 01:06:21.320]  alcohol and call it beer, so it's a beer-like substance.
[01:06:21.320 --> 01:06:25.920]  But we were discussing, we didn't know if Mexican beer was real beer or not, so if anybody
[01:06:25.920 --> 01:06:32.040]  knows, send us an email or something to let us know what it really is.
[01:06:32.040 --> 01:06:33.920]  Back to Roger in Wisconsin.
[01:06:33.920 --> 01:06:38.640]  Now, Roger, they got Falstaff up there, now that's real beer.
[01:06:38.640 --> 01:06:44.440]  No, I'm surprised of you, you're being from Scarborough, that's old-style country, and
[01:06:44.440 --> 01:06:49.120]  then the Schlitz, I think, was another, but they drink a lot of beer.
[01:06:49.120 --> 01:06:51.480]  Oh, you got a blue ribbon, Schlitz.
[01:06:51.480 --> 01:07:03.760]  I need two Schlitz and a Falstaff, but there's no place that I'd rather be than right here
[01:07:03.760 --> 01:07:11.000]  with my red neck, white socks, and blue ribbon beer.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  I grew up with that.
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.720]  Okay, where were we, Roger?
[01:07:15.720 --> 01:07:23.360]  Well, I got a kick out of what you said to Tenacious Tina about her being a girl.
[01:07:23.360 --> 01:07:26.720]  No, that's Tenacious Tina.
[01:07:26.720 --> 01:07:33.560]  Tenacious Tina, okay, and about her being a girl, and you better be careful all of that,
[01:07:33.560 --> 01:07:34.560]  right?
[01:07:34.560 --> 01:07:40.640]  So I'm in this hearing, whatever kind of meeting it was, with this newbie manager, general
[01:07:40.640 --> 01:07:54.280]  manager of this hotel, and upon this meeting, I couldn't get a straight answer out of him,
[01:07:54.280 --> 01:08:02.120]  and they're making all of these false and misleading charges, and I mentioned my actions,
[01:08:02.120 --> 01:08:06.520]  it was, he goes, yeah, I heard you were going upstairs.
[01:08:06.520 --> 01:08:13.120]  Well, yeah, I was going to check out fire extinguishers, because apparently they, you
[01:08:13.120 --> 01:08:14.680]  know, right?
[01:08:14.680 --> 01:08:25.440]  And on the ground level, there was two newbie new hires waiting for their trainer or whatever,
[01:08:25.440 --> 01:08:28.880]  and he mentions, yeah, and I hear you're going upstairs.
[01:08:28.880 --> 01:08:37.880]  So upstairs, the only people I seen were two hospitality workers, and I addressed them
[01:08:37.880 --> 01:08:44.200]  when I mentioned, I said, the only one I've seen were two females, and they objected to
[01:08:44.200 --> 01:08:45.200]  that.
[01:08:45.200 --> 01:08:53.040]  Like, you call Tenacious Tina a girl or something, you know?
[01:08:53.040 --> 01:08:57.600]  And they both looked at each other, the maintenance manager and the general manager looked at
[01:08:57.600 --> 01:09:02.600]  each other like, you know, he was a witness to what I just said or something.
[01:09:02.600 --> 01:09:08.160]  I'm just like, if you have objections to that, you would have objections to every police
[01:09:08.160 --> 01:09:14.200]  report and every governmental report ever made, I think, am I correct?
[01:09:14.200 --> 01:09:15.200]  Yeah.
[01:09:15.200 --> 01:09:16.200]  Yeah.
[01:09:16.200 --> 01:09:22.760]  It's like, what could they possibly be offended about?
[01:09:22.760 --> 01:09:27.960]  You should have said there were two people up there with no pants on.
[01:09:27.960 --> 01:09:41.240]  So, he replied and said, well, you spoke to two guys, and it didn't seem like that.
[01:09:41.240 --> 01:09:42.240]  Whoa.
[01:09:42.240 --> 01:09:46.560]  All I'm hearing is some loud white noise.
[01:09:46.560 --> 01:09:48.360]  I'm not able to hear you talking.
[01:09:48.360 --> 01:09:51.480]  Are you close enough to the mic there?
[01:09:51.480 --> 01:09:54.160]  Can you hear me now?
[01:09:54.160 --> 01:09:55.160]  Okay.
[01:09:55.160 --> 01:09:56.160]  There we go.
[01:09:56.160 --> 01:09:57.160]  Yeah.
[01:09:57.160 --> 01:09:58.160]  That's good.
[01:09:58.160 --> 01:09:59.160]  Go ahead.
[01:09:59.160 --> 01:10:02.120]  I think there was some interference maybe on your end.
[01:10:02.120 --> 01:10:03.120]  Anyway.
[01:10:03.120 --> 01:10:04.120]  Okay.
[01:10:04.120 --> 01:10:05.120]  I think it was me and I suppressed you.
[01:10:05.120 --> 01:10:10.080]  You still have problems with your microphone, Randy?
[01:10:10.080 --> 01:10:12.680]  No, I have an air conditioner in the background.
[01:10:12.680 --> 01:10:20.600]  I either had to turn the air conditioner on or do the show naked.
[01:10:20.600 --> 01:10:25.160]  And doing the show naked was not an option because I might accidentally see myself in
[01:10:25.160 --> 01:10:27.800]  a mirror.
[01:10:27.800 --> 01:10:29.800]  That would really be bad.
[01:10:29.800 --> 01:10:30.800]  Yeah.
[01:10:30.800 --> 01:10:37.440]  That's how you said you were doing much better now or something with the stem cell therapy.
[01:10:37.440 --> 01:10:38.440]  Yeah.
[01:10:38.440 --> 01:10:39.440]  Yeah.
[01:10:39.440 --> 01:10:45.640]  But I'm still, I've lost all the, I don't have any love handles at all.
[01:10:45.640 --> 01:10:46.640]  That's all gone.
[01:10:46.640 --> 01:10:47.640]  Really?
[01:10:47.640 --> 01:10:51.360]  Yeah, my stomach is still thick.
[01:10:51.360 --> 01:10:52.360]  It's not going down.
[01:10:52.360 --> 01:10:53.360]  Oh, I see.
[01:10:53.360 --> 01:10:54.360]  Right.
[01:10:54.360 --> 01:10:55.360]  Oh.
[01:10:55.360 --> 01:10:56.360]  Yeah.
[01:10:56.360 --> 01:10:59.360]  Maybe it's just all muscle.
[01:10:59.360 --> 01:11:00.360]  Yeah.
[01:11:00.360 --> 01:11:04.560]  Well, I tell people there's a lot of muscle underneath all of that.
[01:11:04.560 --> 01:11:05.560]  Yeah.
[01:11:05.560 --> 01:11:06.560]  Right.
[01:11:06.560 --> 01:11:15.840]  So anyways, you know, I still have to clarify with the corporate headquarters management
[01:11:15.840 --> 01:11:22.400]  people and stuff and find out if I'm, you know, it's been days to find out if I'm the
[01:11:22.400 --> 01:11:25.680]  verification of employment, you know.
[01:11:25.680 --> 01:11:33.600]  And now with the social complaints, you know, that stirred up a beehive effect, I'm sure,
[01:11:33.600 --> 01:11:34.600]  over there.
[01:11:34.600 --> 01:11:42.040]  And so I'm just really wondering if I should continue on with such a, you know, company
[01:11:42.040 --> 01:11:45.280]  under these, you know.
[01:11:45.280 --> 01:11:53.040]  Well, instead of walking away, maybe you could get them to fire you.
[01:11:53.040 --> 01:12:01.680]  Well, you know, they're hanging on the fence and I have shuttle assignments that come up
[01:12:01.680 --> 01:12:08.720]  and it's just this young general manager guy goes, well, I'll just do it myself.
[01:12:08.720 --> 01:12:09.720]  Okay.
[01:12:09.720 --> 01:12:14.600]  Well, you're going to do all of them yourself, you know, from here on out.
[01:12:14.600 --> 01:12:22.800]  And you know, not fire me and I'm just not doing anything, but I'm still working there.
[01:12:22.800 --> 01:12:29.160]  You know, what's, you know, and then I'm playing phone tag with the court.
[01:12:29.160 --> 01:12:31.960]  It's like they're totally being evasive and everything.
[01:12:31.960 --> 01:12:38.800]  And I don't know, it's just, because I even told them in that meeting, it's like, you
[01:12:38.800 --> 01:12:45.380]  know, after this, I feel like just giving a two week notice.
[01:12:45.380 --> 01:12:52.520]  And that was another issue because the prior maintenance guy that I replaced supposedly
[01:12:52.520 --> 01:12:58.160]  gave to, if you just walk off the job, they will not allow you back.
[01:12:58.160 --> 01:13:03.360]  But if you give a two week notice, you could possibly come back.
[01:13:03.360 --> 01:13:08.720]  And what it was, was the former maintenance guy gave two weeks notice, but then I found
[01:13:08.720 --> 01:13:14.440]  out from the former manager, general manager that he didn't fulfill it.
[01:13:14.440 --> 01:13:20.160]  So, I mean, is that an illegal, there was another question, would that be like an illegal
[01:13:20.160 --> 01:13:26.800]  hiring practice if it could be proven or anything?
[01:13:26.800 --> 01:13:29.600]  That is illegal.
[01:13:29.600 --> 01:13:32.840]  What that were you speaking to?
[01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:45.200]  Oh, if it can be proven that it requires two weeks advance notice upon leaving or, you
[01:13:45.200 --> 01:13:46.200]  know.
[01:13:46.200 --> 01:13:50.520]  Oh, no, no, that all goes, that's contract.
[01:13:50.520 --> 01:13:54.680]  If you agree to that, then there's nothing wrong with that.
[01:13:54.680 --> 01:14:02.160]  That's a condition of hiring and you agree to it when you enter into a contract, there's
[01:14:02.160 --> 01:14:04.600]  nothing wrong with that.
[01:14:04.600 --> 01:14:11.240]  Well, I was within two departments within the same corporation.
[01:14:11.240 --> 01:14:16.160]  One was his shuttle driver, the other one, it was maintenance.
[01:14:16.160 --> 01:14:22.080]  And suddenly this guy came back and then I found out from the former manager when he
[01:14:22.080 --> 01:14:30.880]  had left, he said he didn't fulfill this two week notice that you have to give, otherwise
[01:14:30.880 --> 01:14:37.920]  you cannot, that they have a strict policy of not to hire back someone who doesn't fulfill
[01:14:37.920 --> 01:14:38.920]  it.
[01:14:38.920 --> 01:14:44.720]  Okay, yeah, but that's all contract, that's absolutely legal.
[01:14:44.720 --> 01:14:50.680]  If you agreed to that, if that was in the contract when you were hired, then you're
[01:14:50.680 --> 01:14:53.240]  bound to it.
[01:14:53.240 --> 01:15:00.840]  If it was not in the contract when you were hired, whether or not you're bound to it is
[01:15:00.840 --> 01:15:05.800]  iffy.
[01:15:05.800 --> 01:15:13.660]  If they change their contract and gave you the option of continuing employment by signing
[01:15:13.660 --> 01:15:26.600]  the new contract or they would not fire you, just not continue your employment, they can't
[01:15:26.600 --> 01:15:33.760]  add new conditions without either you're agreeing to them or compensating you in some
[01:15:33.760 --> 01:15:40.960]  way because the new conditions would be, what's the term, Brett?
[01:15:40.960 --> 01:15:43.640]  That'd be unconscionable.
[01:15:43.640 --> 01:15:46.000]  It's unilaterally beneficial.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  Unconscionable.
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:52.360]  If it's not mutually beneficial, it's unconscionable.
[01:15:52.360 --> 01:15:59.440]  Yeah, exactly, that's where one side gets a benefit and you don't get a counter benefit.
[01:15:59.440 --> 01:16:05.120]  But otherwise, if it's in the contract, it's perfectly legal to be in there.
[01:16:05.120 --> 01:16:11.200]  Let me ask you something though, just for point of clarification, you said, well, just
[01:16:11.200 --> 01:16:17.920]  what's the difference between we're firing you and we're deciding not to continue your
[01:16:17.920 --> 01:16:18.920]  employment?
[01:16:18.920 --> 01:16:21.520]  It kind of sounds like the same thing to me.
[01:16:21.520 --> 01:16:22.520]  How's that different?
[01:16:22.520 --> 01:16:25.520]  That's exactly what I was thinking too, yeah.
[01:16:25.520 --> 01:16:33.720]  No, I spoke to that in the context of a new contract.
[01:16:33.720 --> 01:16:36.360]  If they cancel the old contract.
[01:16:36.360 --> 01:16:39.440]  How can they?
[01:16:39.440 --> 01:16:46.640]  If it's in the contract, if the contract renews, generally a contract will always renew in
[01:16:46.640 --> 01:16:48.640]  a given period of time.
[01:16:48.640 --> 01:16:55.480]  Not usually annually, but sometimes if there's a condition in the contract where it renews
[01:16:55.480 --> 01:17:00.960]  every so often, most all companies do that so they can make it.
[01:17:00.960 --> 01:17:05.360]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[01:17:05.360 --> 01:17:06.360]  Word?
[01:17:06.360 --> 01:17:11.480]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[01:17:11.480 --> 01:17:17.880]  Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:17.880 --> 01:17:22.400]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[01:17:22.400 --> 01:17:24.800]  dividing the word of truth.
[01:17:24.800 --> 01:17:28.800]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse
[01:17:28.800 --> 01:17:32.120]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:17:32.120 --> 01:17:36.760]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[01:17:36.760 --> 01:17:39.120]  and Christian character development.
[01:17:39.120 --> 01:17:43.640]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.640 --> 01:17:47.960]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[01:17:47.960 --> 01:17:50.240]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:50.240 --> 01:17:56.880]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[01:17:56.880 --> 01:18:00.720]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.720 --> 01:18:05.480]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.480 --> 01:18:09.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:18:09.560 --> 01:18:13.880]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:18:13.880 --> 01:18:14.880]  can win too.
[01:18:14.880 --> 01:18:19.680]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:18:19.680 --> 01:18:25.480]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:18:25.480 --> 01:18:30.120]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:18:30.120 --> 01:18:34.320]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.320 --> 01:18:39.120]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.120 --> 01:18:41.360]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.360 --> 01:18:47.080]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:18:47.080 --> 01:18:50.040]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:59.040]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:18:59.040 --> 01:19:00.040]  collectors now.
[01:19:00.040 --> 01:19:10.080]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.080 --> 01:19:36.520]  Ain't gonna blind me, don't bore me, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.520 --> 01:19:40.440]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans.
[01:19:40.440 --> 01:19:41.520]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:41.520 --> 01:19:44.660]  Randy Kelms, Randy Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:44.660 --> 01:19:47.080]  We're talking to Roger in Wisconsin.
[01:19:47.080 --> 01:19:49.120]  But, Roger, we need to move along.
[01:19:49.120 --> 01:19:53.620]  We got three segments and three callers.
[01:19:53.620 --> 01:19:55.120]  Yes, sir.
[01:19:55.120 --> 01:19:56.120]  Do you have anything-
[01:19:56.120 --> 01:19:57.120]  I just wanted to-
[01:19:57.120 --> 01:19:59.280]  Anything of great importance?
[01:19:59.280 --> 01:20:06.380]  Yes, I wanted to say that right after I asked about what type of hearing it was, I was
[01:20:06.380 --> 01:20:18.480]  going to say, and I make a blanket objection to basically anything that he or they would
[01:20:18.480 --> 01:20:35.600]  say, because I know it was all just to get me to basically swear or say the wrong thing,
[01:20:35.600 --> 01:20:44.300]  which would be, what do you call that, insubordination.
[01:20:44.300 --> 01:20:49.540]  Well, that's the kind of thing you report.
[01:20:49.540 --> 01:20:56.180]  If they're treating you differently, then you report that as retaliation.
[01:20:56.180 --> 01:21:06.300]  Then if they do that and you wind up being forced to quit, to resign or take a different
[01:21:06.300 --> 01:21:12.180]  employment, then you can sue them for accusing them of retaliating and forcing you out.
[01:21:12.180 --> 01:21:13.180]  Right.
[01:21:13.180 --> 01:21:19.820]  Yeah, that's what the letter said from OSHA to do.
[01:21:19.820 --> 01:21:25.300]  It's not about, don't get hung up on whether or not you can win the suit.
[01:21:25.300 --> 01:21:28.380]  It's not about that.
[01:21:28.380 --> 01:21:36.900]  You don't file this suit expecting the court to render a ruling in your favor at the end
[01:21:36.900 --> 01:21:39.220]  of the day.
[01:21:39.220 --> 01:21:44.700]  You file this suit with the specific intent of forcing them to the table and write you
[01:21:44.700 --> 01:21:47.420]  a check so you quit beating them up.
[01:21:47.420 --> 01:21:51.020]  Yes, that's what I wanted to hear.
[01:21:51.020 --> 01:21:52.020]  Thank you very much.
[01:21:52.020 --> 01:21:58.020]  And I'll be in contact with you also on that foreclosure, the...
[01:21:58.020 --> 01:22:05.020]  Okay, just email me on that.
[01:22:05.020 --> 01:22:06.020]  Okay.
[01:22:06.020 --> 01:22:07.020]  I did.
[01:22:07.020 --> 01:22:08.020]  Now we're...
[01:22:08.020 --> 01:22:09.020]  Okay.
[01:22:09.020 --> 01:22:10.020]  Bye.
[01:22:10.020 --> 01:22:11.020]  Okay.
[01:22:11.020 --> 01:22:12.020]  Thank you, Roger.
[01:22:12.020 --> 01:22:13.220]  Now we're going to go to Chris in New York.
[01:22:13.220 --> 01:22:14.700]  Hello, Chris.
[01:22:14.700 --> 01:22:19.020]  What do you have for us today?
[01:22:19.020 --> 01:22:24.020]  Randy, can you hear me?
[01:22:24.020 --> 01:22:25.020]  Yes.
[01:22:25.020 --> 01:22:26.020]  I can hear you.
[01:22:26.020 --> 01:22:34.100]  So I was listening to some of the old rule of law radio podcasts just probably five months
[01:22:34.100 --> 01:22:39.500]  ago and you mentioned something about a conference that happened in New York with a bunch of
[01:22:39.500 --> 01:22:41.180]  pro-state people.
[01:22:41.180 --> 01:22:43.020]  You're thinking about doing that again?
[01:22:43.020 --> 01:22:50.740]  Oh, no, I think what you're referring to is a mock trial that we had, but that wasn't
[01:22:50.740 --> 01:22:51.740]  in New York.
[01:22:51.740 --> 01:22:53.660]  That was in Massachusetts.
[01:22:53.660 --> 01:23:03.780]  I do expect to be making a trip up to New York relatively soon, up to a place called
[01:23:03.780 --> 01:23:05.780]  Middleville, New York.
[01:23:05.780 --> 01:23:09.100]  I know where that is.
[01:23:09.100 --> 01:23:14.740]  Okay, for those of you who don't know, it's right across the Canadian River from the Herkimer
[01:23:14.740 --> 01:23:20.940]  Diamond Mines, except they're not really diamonds.
[01:23:20.940 --> 01:23:25.940]  They are the clearest quartz crystals on the planet.
[01:23:25.940 --> 01:23:35.940]  Anyway, yeah, I do expect to come up there for a week or so and see Master Paster.
[01:23:35.940 --> 01:23:40.940]  I call him Master Paster because he has control issues.
[01:23:40.940 --> 01:23:47.460]  But as far as a mock trial, I've had people that wanted to do that, but they're a little
[01:23:47.460 --> 01:23:55.580]  hard to organize and I don't have any plans to do that.
[01:23:55.580 --> 01:24:04.020]  Brett and I are too busy with real trials.
[01:24:04.020 --> 01:24:07.580]  So did you have a question for us or a comment?
[01:24:07.580 --> 01:24:09.620]  Yeah, yeah, I do.
[01:24:09.620 --> 01:24:14.820]  So I have a federal civil case and all the papers.
[01:24:14.820 --> 01:24:15.820]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:24:15.820 --> 01:24:17.580]  You sound kind of ringy.
[01:24:17.580 --> 01:24:22.100]  Are you on a Bluetooth or a hands-free device?
[01:24:22.100 --> 01:24:23.860]  I am, but that's all I can do.
[01:24:23.860 --> 01:24:27.940]  I've got to sit in the window or I can't talk on it.
[01:24:27.940 --> 01:24:29.780]  Oh, okay.
[01:24:29.780 --> 01:24:32.580]  We'll talk a little bit slower.
[01:24:32.580 --> 01:24:40.260]  Okay, so all the papers have, reply papers have been in for the motion to dismiss against
[01:24:40.260 --> 01:24:44.260]  my federal civil suit for over seven months.
[01:24:44.260 --> 01:24:47.580]  Is there anything I can do?
[01:24:47.580 --> 01:24:57.180]  Okay, the opposing side filed a motion to dismiss.
[01:24:57.180 --> 01:25:00.180]  That was a question.
[01:25:00.180 --> 01:25:08.380]  Hello, are you there?
[01:25:08.380 --> 01:25:09.380]  I am not hearing you.
[01:25:09.380 --> 01:25:10.380]  I can't hear him.
[01:25:10.380 --> 01:25:11.820]  I just hear your fan.
[01:25:11.820 --> 01:25:16.140]  I wonder if he's talking and it's getting suppressed.
[01:25:16.140 --> 01:25:17.140]  I don't have a fan.
[01:25:17.140 --> 01:25:19.460]  I'm outside now and I don't have it on hands-free.
[01:25:19.460 --> 01:25:21.460]  No, that was me.
[01:25:21.460 --> 01:25:24.500]  We heard you now.
[01:25:24.500 --> 01:25:25.500]  Yeah.
[01:25:25.500 --> 01:25:26.500]  Go ahead.
[01:25:26.500 --> 01:25:33.500]  So yes, yes, they filed a motion to dismiss.
[01:25:33.500 --> 01:25:35.900]  What was the nature of the motion?
[01:25:35.900 --> 01:25:40.500]  It was just 12B1 and six.
[01:25:40.500 --> 01:25:42.700]  Okay, that's knee-jerk.
[01:25:42.700 --> 01:25:45.580]  That's standard stuff.
[01:25:45.580 --> 01:25:49.700]  So what was the nature of your claim?
[01:25:49.700 --> 01:25:55.060]  1983 claim for a mask issue.
[01:25:55.060 --> 01:26:01.540]  1983 claim for what?
[01:26:01.540 --> 01:26:05.260]  For denying me access to a public accommodation.
[01:26:05.260 --> 01:26:08.620]  Oh, okay.
[01:26:08.620 --> 01:26:10.780]  So you just filed a response to it.
[01:26:10.780 --> 01:26:15.260]  I just filed a bunch of responses to 12B6.
[01:26:15.260 --> 01:26:19.660]  Okay, here's the deal with 12B6.
[01:26:19.660 --> 01:26:30.380]  12B6 states that either, what's 12B1, Brett?
[01:26:30.380 --> 01:26:31.380]  Jurisdiction.
[01:26:31.380 --> 01:26:39.860]  Jurisdiction, but how did they get to jurisdiction on the 12B1?
[01:26:39.860 --> 01:26:44.100]  They're just challenging that there is no jurisdiction, so it should be dismissed.
[01:26:44.100 --> 01:26:48.420]  There was something more specific than that.
[01:26:48.420 --> 01:26:54.820]  I think they're saying that you can't sue them in that capacity.
[01:26:54.820 --> 01:27:00.220]  I think that's what it was, but anyway, 12B1 is not a problem if you filed in a court.
[01:27:00.220 --> 01:27:07.180]  If you have a federal claim and you filed in a federal court, then you pretty well get
[01:27:07.180 --> 01:27:13.820]  past it unless the individuals have absolute immunity.
[01:27:13.820 --> 01:27:15.700]  Did you sue public officials?
[01:27:15.700 --> 01:27:18.580]  I sued public officials.
[01:27:18.580 --> 01:27:24.780]  I already filed my response papers, and they've been in for over seven months.
[01:27:24.780 --> 01:27:29.540]  I'm just asking, is there anything I can do to speed up the response of the court?
[01:27:29.540 --> 01:27:30.540]  Yes.
[01:27:30.540 --> 01:27:35.220]  Oh, okay, that's easier.
[01:27:35.220 --> 01:27:46.780]  Order a petition for writ of mandamus and tell the court of appeals that the trial court
[01:27:46.780 --> 01:27:57.260]  is denying you a speedy trial by refusing to hear a motion, your response to 12B6, and
[01:27:57.260 --> 01:28:08.300]  ask the court of appeals to mandate to the trial court that they render a ruling on the
[01:28:08.300 --> 01:28:09.300]  12B6.
[01:28:09.300 --> 01:28:15.580]  But that's going to go to how busy these courts are.
[01:28:15.580 --> 01:28:19.500]  How many months did you say it had been?
[01:28:19.500 --> 01:28:20.980]  Seven.
[01:28:20.980 --> 01:28:23.860]  That's not unusual.
[01:28:23.860 --> 01:28:34.220]  The last cert I filed in California, it took them nine months to respond to it.
[01:28:34.220 --> 01:28:40.620]  The courts, they don't have enough judges, and the courts are overcrowded.
[01:28:40.620 --> 01:28:47.540]  That's why they're using magistrate judges to try to help them clear the dockets.
[01:28:47.540 --> 01:28:53.980]  That's just so, I would suggest you contact the clerk and see if the clerk can nudge the
[01:28:53.980 --> 01:29:01.540]  court to move along or have the clerk check and see why it's not moving along and ask
[01:29:01.540 --> 01:29:04.660]  if you need to prepare a mandamus.
[01:29:04.660 --> 01:29:09.540]  If you ask the clerk if you need to prepare a mandamus, then she'll go to the magistrate
[01:29:09.540 --> 01:29:14.020]  judge or to the trial judge and tell them this guy's about to file a mandamus.
[01:29:14.020 --> 01:29:22.420]  Then we move this guy along so we don't cause us a pain in the rear.
[01:29:22.420 --> 01:29:25.740]  Don't start a fight if you can avoid it, if you can just talk to the clerks.
[01:29:25.740 --> 01:29:29.460]  Clerks in the federal court especially are very, very helpful.
[01:29:29.460 --> 01:29:30.460]  Okay.
[01:29:30.460 --> 01:29:31.460]  Thank you.
[01:29:31.460 --> 01:29:32.460]  That's it.
[01:29:32.460 --> 01:29:33.460]  Okay.
[01:29:33.460 --> 01:29:34.460]  Perfect timing.
[01:29:34.460 --> 01:29:41.460]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio.
[01:29:41.460 --> 01:29:45.140]  We've got Kirk in Washington, Jack in Texas.
[01:29:45.140 --> 01:29:46.140]  We'll get to both of you.
[01:29:46.140 --> 01:29:47.140]  Hang on.
[01:29:47.140 --> 01:29:50.140]  I'm not going to give out the call-in number.
[01:29:50.140 --> 01:29:52.020]  We've only got two segments.
[01:29:52.020 --> 01:30:02.900]  Debra picks on me for saying segments, so we've got two segments left, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.900 --> 01:30:08.820]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps
[01:30:08.820 --> 01:30:09.820]  on growing.
[01:30:09.820 --> 01:30:12.860]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.860 --> 01:30:17.020]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:17.020 --> 01:30:18.740]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.740 --> 01:30:22.340]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.340 --> 01:30:27.340]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.340 --> 01:30:32.620]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.620 --> 01:30:35.100]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.100 --> 01:30:40.660]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.660 --> 01:30:42.460]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.460 --> 01:30:44.460]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.460 --> 01:30:48.660]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.660 --> 01:30:54.300]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart, but think again, all that stress
[01:30:54.300 --> 01:30:56.140]  might be eating your brain.
[01:30:56.140 --> 01:31:01.140]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually
[01:31:01.140 --> 01:31:04.700]  makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.700 --> 01:31:08.660]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter
[01:31:08.660 --> 01:31:10.940]  in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:10.940 --> 01:31:16.100]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:16.100 --> 01:31:18.380]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:31:18.380 --> 01:31:21.500]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.500 --> 01:31:31.420]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.420 --> 01:31:36.780]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.780 --> 01:31:39.020]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.020 --> 01:31:43.860]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.860 --> 01:31:46.540]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.540 --> 01:31:49.300]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.300 --> 01:31:50.660]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.660 --> 01:31:51.660]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.660 --> 01:31:53.140]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.140 --> 01:31:54.140]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.140 --> 01:31:55.820]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.820 --> 01:31:58.380]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.380 --> 01:32:01.660]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.660 --> 01:32:05.860]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:05.860 --> 01:32:09.660]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:09.660 --> 01:32:13.780]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.780 --> 01:32:16.820]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.820 --> 01:32:20.860]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.860 --> 01:32:24.700]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.700 --> 01:32:26.100]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.100 --> 01:32:30.060]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:30.060 --> 01:32:33.820]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.820 --> 01:32:36.220]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.220 --> 01:32:40.220]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:40.220 --> 01:32:41.540]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.540 --> 01:32:44.740]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.740 --> 01:32:49.300]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.300 --> 01:32:51.620]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.620 --> 01:32:55.580]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.580 --> 01:33:02.580]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:26.180 --> 01:33:33.180]  And when you go computer reading, you can't hide myself from nobody, when I say chip in
[01:33:33.180 --> 01:33:37.180]  on your mom, chip in on your daddy, chip in on your grandpa and your granny, chip in on
[01:33:37.180 --> 01:33:42.380]  me, chip in on your baby, chip in on your family, whole family, chip in on your dog
[01:33:42.380 --> 01:33:47.380]  and the cat around me, chip in on the beef when you still go eat it, chip in on the fish
[01:33:47.380 --> 01:34:05.940]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, we're at Fountain Root of Law Radio, and we're going
[01:34:05.940 --> 01:34:07.260]  to Kirk in Washington.
[01:34:07.260 --> 01:34:09.100]  Kirk, what do you have for us?
[01:34:09.100 --> 01:34:17.140]  Oh, I'm supposed to talk now, wow, hey there, hey Randy, I'm just calling in to give a
[01:34:17.140 --> 01:34:23.500]  shout out to Root of Law Radio because I would not have survived these last two years if
[01:34:23.500 --> 01:34:26.260]  it wasn't for Randy and Brett.
[01:34:26.260 --> 01:34:30.620]  Is that a good enough plug?
[01:34:30.620 --> 01:34:32.100]  That is nice to hear.
[01:34:32.100 --> 01:34:34.260]  Well, that's encouraging.
[01:34:34.260 --> 01:34:37.220]  Is there a but on that?
[01:34:37.220 --> 01:34:44.980]  And also, I want to remind everybody to help out with Randy's beer fund, there's a plug.
[01:34:44.980 --> 01:34:48.460]  So yeah, let me explain the beer fund.
[01:34:48.460 --> 01:34:54.380]  The beer fund's kind of a running joke, we do have it on the website, but everything
[01:34:54.380 --> 01:35:00.300]  that goes into the beer fund goes to the radio, I take nothing.
[01:35:00.300 --> 01:35:09.460]  I also have a book that I wrote, Legal 101, and everything that goes to that goes to the
[01:35:09.460 --> 01:35:12.780]  radio, I take nothing.
[01:35:12.780 --> 01:35:20.900]  So sometimes we're struggling because Deborah's using really old equipment, back when it got
[01:35:20.900 --> 01:35:26.020]  really hot once, she had to shut everything down, we had to put it in an archive because
[01:35:26.020 --> 01:35:30.180]  she couldn't keep the equipment cool.
[01:35:30.180 --> 01:35:38.140]  So we're really keeping this thing going on a shoestring, and we do need some help
[01:35:38.140 --> 01:35:44.140]  sometimes, we have equipment go down and we have to replace it, and it really gets to
[01:35:44.140 --> 01:35:46.060]  be a struggle.
[01:35:46.060 --> 01:35:48.780]  So we appreciate anything we can get.
[01:35:48.780 --> 01:35:53.700]  Okay, with that said, do you have something else nice to say for us?
[01:35:53.700 --> 01:35:56.340]  If you don't, you can just get lost.
[01:35:56.340 --> 01:36:04.940]  Well, I have a question, and hopefully my question will allow you a platform to pontificate
[01:36:04.940 --> 01:36:12.580]  and show everybody what a brilliant mastermind of litigation you are.
[01:36:12.580 --> 01:36:18.060]  So I've got a situation.
[01:36:18.060 --> 01:36:25.060]  The background on it is that the house that I bought with my son's mom, her and her attorneys
[01:36:25.060 --> 01:36:32.740]  have been trying to defraud me of my house and get me ejected so that she can steal it
[01:36:32.740 --> 01:36:35.540]  and sell it off, right?
[01:36:35.540 --> 01:36:46.060]  And you know, unsurprising because it's kind of me against the entire city and county here.
[01:36:46.060 --> 01:36:50.460]  I'm in a bit of a corruption, shall we say.
[01:36:50.460 --> 01:36:51.460]  The judge...
[01:36:51.460 --> 01:36:57.940]  Okay, well, first question I have is how many bar grievances have you filed?
[01:36:57.940 --> 01:37:00.220]  What?
[01:37:00.220 --> 01:37:01.220]  Judicial complaints?
[01:37:01.220 --> 01:37:02.220]  Oh yeah.
[01:37:02.220 --> 01:37:03.220]  Good, good, good.
[01:37:03.220 --> 01:37:04.220]  Okay, okay.
[01:37:04.220 --> 01:37:13.180]  I've done a lot of work with property and foreclosure type issues.
[01:37:13.180 --> 01:37:18.180]  What is the claim that the wife is bringing?
[01:37:18.180 --> 01:37:26.500]  And I guess before that, did you have children in the divorce and did you get the children
[01:37:26.500 --> 01:37:29.300]  and are they living in the house?
[01:37:29.300 --> 01:37:33.460]  Can you turn off that space alien noise?
[01:37:33.460 --> 01:37:34.460]  Yeah.
[01:37:34.460 --> 01:37:38.820]  So we were never married.
[01:37:38.820 --> 01:37:44.180]  We were, everything was basically common law agreements, like raising our son for the first
[01:37:44.180 --> 01:37:47.040]  12 years, buying the house together.
[01:37:47.040 --> 01:37:48.580]  We trusted each other.
[01:37:48.580 --> 01:37:50.220]  Okay, hold on.
[01:37:50.220 --> 01:37:57.860]  What is the common law rules or statute in Washington?
[01:37:57.860 --> 01:38:00.140]  I say it is.
[01:38:00.140 --> 01:38:03.620]  What are the common law statutes in Washington?
[01:38:03.620 --> 01:38:04.860]  There's no common law marriage.
[01:38:04.860 --> 01:38:08.340]  So even if you lived together for seven years, you're not considered married.
[01:38:08.340 --> 01:38:14.900]  So when I say we had common law agreements, I mean, we agreed when we found out that my
[01:38:14.900 --> 01:38:22.460]  son was in utero that we would co-parent him amicably and that worked for 12 years.
[01:38:22.460 --> 01:38:30.340]  So when you purchase the house, are both names on the house?
[01:38:30.340 --> 01:38:32.900]  Nope.
[01:38:32.900 --> 01:38:34.380]  Is it only your name?
[01:38:34.380 --> 01:38:36.340]  No, it's only her name.
[01:38:36.340 --> 01:38:38.580]  So only her name was on the birth certificate.
[01:38:38.580 --> 01:38:41.260]  Only her name was on the title to my car.
[01:38:41.260 --> 01:38:43.820]  Only her name was on the title to my house.
[01:38:43.820 --> 01:38:51.900]  And that's when her and her new girlfriend were like, hey, let's screw Kurt.
[01:38:51.900 --> 01:39:00.020]  And so that's one of the things I've been dealing with for the last couple of years.
[01:39:00.020 --> 01:39:04.140]  Has she not lived in the house for a while?
[01:39:04.140 --> 01:39:05.140]  Yeah.
[01:39:05.140 --> 01:39:14.140]  So she moved out in 2020 and bought her own house with her fellow escort.
[01:39:14.140 --> 01:39:24.380]  And I have lots and lots and lots of text messages proving that the house is ours, that
[01:39:24.380 --> 01:39:28.900]  she wanted me to buy her out of her house after she moved out.
[01:39:28.900 --> 01:39:31.180]  And we had dialogue going back and forth.
[01:39:31.180 --> 01:39:37.700]  So without going into too much detail, rest assured, there's voluminous evidence of her
[01:39:37.700 --> 01:39:41.580]  acknowledging that the house is ours.
[01:39:41.580 --> 01:39:50.820]  Okay, what is the nature of the claim that she's bringing toward the house?
[01:39:50.820 --> 01:39:56.660]  Well I actually, so this is how twisted the judicial system here is against me.
[01:39:56.660 --> 01:40:06.140]  I actually brought the claim for constructive fraud against her initially last year because
[01:40:06.140 --> 01:40:13.740]  I knew that she was trying to assert that I was just a renter in her house because I
[01:40:13.740 --> 01:40:24.420]  got wind that she had crafted this phony lease where supposedly I was the renter and that
[01:40:24.420 --> 01:40:27.100]  she was going to try and screw me out of the house.
[01:40:27.100 --> 01:40:33.900]  So to preempt that, I filed a constructive fraud lawsuit.
[01:40:33.900 --> 01:40:42.140]  Long story short, the judge threw it out, said that I was just imagining it and that
[01:40:42.140 --> 01:40:47.500]  clearly I was the renter with no right to it.
[01:40:47.500 --> 01:40:58.460]  And then as it progressed along, her attorney switched arguments and totally against judicial
[01:40:58.460 --> 01:41:05.580]  estoppel and said that, no, he's not a renter, he's a squatter in the house.
[01:41:05.580 --> 01:41:10.740]  He didn't even, so after they had initially put forth into the record this fake-
[01:41:10.740 --> 01:41:12.860]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:41:12.860 --> 01:41:13.860]  Yeah.
[01:41:13.860 --> 01:41:18.860]  Do you have adverse possession laws in Washington?
[01:41:18.860 --> 01:41:29.700]  I'm not sure technically on that term.
[01:41:29.700 --> 01:41:32.500]  I have, what's it called?
[01:41:32.500 --> 01:41:42.180]  I have equity ownership in the house, that's established.
[01:41:42.180 --> 01:41:49.060]  The only reason I'm having any problem with this is that the judges are totally corrupt.
[01:41:49.060 --> 01:41:51.100]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:41:51.100 --> 01:41:55.500]  Do you have adverse possession laws in Washington?
[01:41:55.500 --> 01:41:59.780]  Well educate me and your listeners on exactly what that means.
[01:41:59.780 --> 01:42:08.940]  Okay, here in Texas, if you have a piece of property and I squat on your property, we
[01:42:08.940 --> 01:42:14.620]  have a lot of, for a while there we had companies buying up property here and selling to people
[01:42:14.620 --> 01:42:15.620]  in New York.
[01:42:15.620 --> 01:42:21.660]  They never saw it, they bought it as investment property and then the guy dies and his kids
[01:42:21.660 --> 01:42:22.660]  get it.
[01:42:22.660 --> 01:42:30.700]  They live in New York, they don't care about property in Texas, so somebody goes and puts
[01:42:30.700 --> 01:42:37.340]  a tent up, puts a trailer house on the property and just takes possession of it.
[01:42:37.340 --> 01:42:45.220]  If I take possession of your property without your permission and I keep continuous possession
[01:42:45.220 --> 01:42:54.020]  of that property for seven years, I can claim it as mine under adverse possession.
[01:42:54.020 --> 01:42:57.540]  Do you have anything similar in Washington?
[01:42:57.540 --> 01:43:07.300]  Yeah, yeah, yeah, we do and I mean there's entire, so up here in Seattle, Washington,
[01:43:07.300 --> 01:43:14.700]  it's nearly impossible to get a squatter even if they're a drug addict, criminal, shooting
[01:43:14.700 --> 01:43:16.140]  their gun off.
[01:43:16.140 --> 01:43:20.460]  If somebody's squatting in a building, it's almost impossible to get them out.
[01:43:20.460 --> 01:43:22.580]  It takes forever, but-
[01:43:22.580 --> 01:43:26.540]  Okay, now you're a squatter.
[01:43:26.540 --> 01:43:37.900]  Well, yeah, I mean, sure, but we're going to run off the cliff, so I have the question,
[01:43:37.900 --> 01:43:40.900]  so I'll get you with the question on the other side.
[01:43:40.900 --> 01:43:44.460]  Okay, but we need to go quickly, I got Jack and we keep missing him.
[01:43:44.460 --> 01:43:51.220]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, but you know about Jack, he don't know
[01:43:51.220 --> 01:43:55.940]  Jack and he's never heard that joke before.
[01:43:55.940 --> 01:43:58.860]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:43:58.860 --> 01:44:00.340]  Dang, cookies.
[01:44:00.340 --> 01:44:01.340]  Cookie?
[01:44:01.340 --> 01:44:02.340]  Me love cookies.
[01:44:02.340 --> 01:44:04.340]  Oh, hi, Cookie Muncher.
[01:44:04.340 --> 01:44:06.340]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[01:44:06.340 --> 01:44:07.340]  Cookies?
[01:44:07.340 --> 01:44:08.340]  Yucky?
[01:44:08.340 --> 01:44:09.340]  No, no bad cookies.
[01:44:09.340 --> 01:44:11.020]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[01:44:11.020 --> 01:44:12.020]  These are cyber cookies.
[01:44:12.020 --> 01:44:13.020]  No, can't eat?
[01:44:13.020 --> 01:44:16.740]  No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[01:44:16.740 --> 01:44:17.740]  These have apples.
[01:44:17.740 --> 01:44:18.740]  Really?
[01:44:18.740 --> 01:44:20.740]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[01:44:20.740 --> 01:44:22.740]  Yummy apple.
[01:44:22.740 --> 01:44:26.660]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[01:44:26.660 --> 01:44:32.820]  I click control, shift, delete and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[01:44:32.820 --> 01:44:34.420]  Bye bye yucky cookies.
[01:44:34.420 --> 01:44:40.060]  Now I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand
[01:44:40.060 --> 01:44:46.100]  side, bookmark the link and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[01:44:46.100 --> 01:44:47.100]  new cookies.
[01:44:47.100 --> 01:44:48.100]  New cookies?
[01:44:48.100 --> 01:44:49.100]  For me?
[01:44:49.100 --> 01:44:53.500]  I order at an early Christmas present and every time I order on Amazon, I go through
[01:44:53.500 --> 01:44:57.140]  this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[01:44:57.140 --> 01:44:58.140]  Fee is for Cookie.
[01:44:58.140 --> 01:44:59.140]  Fee is for classified.
[01:44:59.140 --> 01:45:04.180]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.180 --> 01:45:10.940]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course
[01:45:10.940 --> 01:45:14.820]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.820 --> 01:45:19.100]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.100 --> 01:45:22.860]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.860 --> 01:45:28.620]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:28.620 --> 01:45:34.540]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.540 --> 01:45:39.060]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.060 --> 01:45:43.380]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.380 --> 01:45:49.540]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.540 --> 01:45:52.340]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.340 --> 01:46:00.620]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866 LAW EASY.
[01:46:00.620 --> 01:46:01.620]  Hello?
[01:46:01.620 --> 01:46:04.620]  Oh man, in jail?
[01:46:04.620 --> 01:46:13.620]  You got busted man?
[01:46:13.620 --> 01:46:22.620]  Oh man, I'm gross dude.
[01:46:22.620 --> 01:46:31.620]  Some things in this world I will never understand, some things I realize fully.
[01:46:31.620 --> 01:46:39.860]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman, somebody's gonna police the police.
[01:46:39.860 --> 01:46:42.340]  There's always a room in here.
[01:46:42.340 --> 01:46:43.700]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:43.700 --> 01:46:47.420]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, ruleoflawradio, and we're talking to Kurt from Washington
[01:46:47.420 --> 01:46:53.020]  and you had one more thing for us, Kurt.
[01:46:53.020 --> 01:46:56.820]  Kurt, you there?
[01:46:56.820 --> 01:47:01.540]  Oh sorry, I was on mute.
[01:47:01.540 --> 01:47:08.980]  Yeah, so the question I have is about liars trying to prejudice the court against me.
[01:47:08.980 --> 01:47:10.980]  And I just wanted your feedback on it.
[01:47:10.980 --> 01:47:18.340]  Oh, that could never happen, R-O-U-S's don't exist.
[01:47:18.340 --> 01:47:21.460]  It's all in your imagination.
[01:47:21.460 --> 01:47:25.660]  Yeah, well, you know, I'm paranoid.
[01:47:25.660 --> 01:47:34.020]  So because I had evidence that this house lawsuit judge and my kid's mom's attorney
[01:47:34.020 --> 01:47:42.060]  were totally in cahoots, I included them as defendants in the federal lawsuit that I filed
[01:47:42.060 --> 01:47:44.420]  last week.
[01:47:44.420 --> 01:47:55.300]  And what has just happened is, because I had to put up a super tedious bond so that I could
[01:47:55.300 --> 01:48:02.300]  stay in the house while the dismissal of the lawsuit appealed.
[01:48:02.300 --> 01:48:10.940]  And the ex's attorney in his, you know, motion arguing against my super tedious bond brought
[01:48:10.940 --> 01:48:19.060]  up the fact that I just filed a federal lawsuit against him and his clients and the judge
[01:48:19.060 --> 01:48:26.240]  in his motion, which has nothing to do with the issue of the super tedious bond.
[01:48:26.240 --> 01:48:34.140]  And so I'm just asking you, doesn't that constitute blatant, a blatant attempt to prejudice the
[01:48:34.140 --> 01:48:37.300]  court against me?
[01:48:37.300 --> 01:48:38.860]  That's exactly what I was thinking.
[01:48:38.860 --> 01:48:49.020]  I would move for mistrial and move to recuse the judge and for sanctions against the lawyer.
[01:48:49.020 --> 01:48:50.020]  Okay.
[01:48:50.020 --> 01:48:56.820]  And then that, when they deny it, then you can appeal the motions to recuse and motion
[01:48:56.820 --> 01:49:00.780]  for sanctions and take that all the way up to the Supreme.
[01:49:00.780 --> 01:49:01.780]  Okay.
[01:49:01.780 --> 01:49:02.780]  I'll do it.
[01:49:02.780 --> 01:49:06.980]  How does he move for mistrial?
[01:49:06.980 --> 01:49:15.540]  You just file a motion and ask the judge to declare a mistrial because the lawyer acted
[01:49:15.540 --> 01:49:23.340]  deliberately, brought in information that was irrelevant to this case in order for the
[01:49:23.340 --> 01:49:30.100]  specific reason, purpose of prejudicing the judge.
[01:49:30.100 --> 01:49:36.580]  And once it's been said in front of the judge, it can't be unsaid.
[01:49:36.580 --> 01:49:43.620]  So you ask them to declare mistrials, start this all over again.
[01:49:43.620 --> 01:49:46.380]  But what if it's already happened?
[01:49:46.380 --> 01:49:49.580]  Yeah, it's too late.
[01:49:49.580 --> 01:49:54.940]  He asked for sanctions against the lawyer and then file a separate suit against the
[01:49:54.940 --> 01:49:55.940]  lawyer.
[01:49:55.940 --> 01:49:58.740]  Oh, you named the lawyer in this suit.
[01:49:58.740 --> 01:50:01.180]  So I asked for sanctions against the lawyer.
[01:50:01.180 --> 01:50:02.180]  Okay.
[01:50:02.180 --> 01:50:07.900]  And I mean, I could still seek to recuse the judge from hearing the super tedious bond
[01:50:07.900 --> 01:50:08.900]  motion.
[01:50:08.900 --> 01:50:09.900]  Right.
[01:50:09.900 --> 01:50:10.900]  So I'll do.
[01:50:10.900 --> 01:50:11.900]  Yeah.
[01:50:11.900 --> 01:50:12.900]  Yeah.
[01:50:12.900 --> 01:50:13.900]  I'll call him.
[01:50:13.900 --> 01:50:14.900]  It's about that.
[01:50:14.900 --> 01:50:17.180]  That's stopping them and costing her more money.
[01:50:17.180 --> 01:50:18.180]  Yeah.
[01:50:18.180 --> 01:50:19.180]  Yeah.
[01:50:19.180 --> 01:50:20.180]  Okay.
[01:50:20.180 --> 01:50:21.180]  I'll let you.
[01:50:21.180 --> 01:50:22.180]  Make sure you bar grieve.
[01:50:22.180 --> 01:50:23.780]  Make sure you bar grieve the lawyer for that.
[01:50:23.780 --> 01:50:25.220]  Oh, guaranteed.
[01:50:25.220 --> 01:50:27.020]  I got a whole list tonight.
[01:50:27.020 --> 01:50:28.020]  Okay.
[01:50:28.020 --> 01:50:30.300]  Then we need to go.
[01:50:30.300 --> 01:50:31.300]  We got Jack.
[01:50:31.300 --> 01:50:32.740]  We're running out of time.
[01:50:32.740 --> 01:50:33.740]  Okay.
[01:50:33.740 --> 01:50:34.740]  Okay.
[01:50:34.740 --> 01:50:36.740]  Thank you, Kurt.
[01:50:36.740 --> 01:50:39.340]  Now we're going to Jack in Texas.
[01:50:39.340 --> 01:50:41.340]  Hello, Jack.
[01:50:41.340 --> 01:50:43.340]  What do you have for us today?
[01:50:43.340 --> 01:50:44.340]  Hello, Jack.
[01:50:44.340 --> 01:50:47.340]  Can you hear me?
[01:50:47.340 --> 01:50:48.340]  Yep.
[01:50:48.340 --> 01:50:51.340]  All right.
[01:50:51.340 --> 01:50:57.980]  I have a suggestion for a guest and I have a couple of questions.
[01:50:57.980 --> 01:50:59.860]  Okay.
[01:50:59.860 --> 01:51:05.940]  I listened to an interview with a lawyer in Victoria, Texas.
[01:51:05.940 --> 01:51:08.220]  Okay.
[01:51:08.220 --> 01:51:09.540]  You got my attention.
[01:51:09.540 --> 01:51:11.980]  I am after Victoria, Texas.
[01:51:11.980 --> 01:51:15.740]  Well, she is too, apparently.
[01:51:15.740 --> 01:51:16.740]  Not just Victoria, Texas.
[01:51:16.740 --> 01:51:18.740]  She's after a bunch of people.
[01:51:18.740 --> 01:51:31.580]  So, she is defending people who are victims of being targeted by the powers that be, you
[01:51:31.580 --> 01:51:38.660]  know, fed with electronic weapons.
[01:51:38.660 --> 01:51:39.660]  And she filed...
[01:51:39.660 --> 01:51:42.380]  What does targeted mean?
[01:51:42.380 --> 01:51:43.620]  That means they are being attacked.
[01:51:43.620 --> 01:51:50.740]  Are we talking about the TI stuff that everybody's talking about on YouTube or are you talking
[01:51:50.740 --> 01:51:55.740]  about some kind of other targeted?
[01:51:55.740 --> 01:51:56.740]  No, no.
[01:51:56.740 --> 01:51:57.740]  TI.
[01:51:57.740 --> 01:51:58.740]  That's right.
[01:51:58.740 --> 01:51:59.740]  Targeted individuals.
[01:51:59.740 --> 01:52:12.420]  So, she filed a $1.5 billion lawsuit against the feds, you know, the three digit agencies,
[01:52:12.420 --> 01:52:21.580]  all the people involved, you know, all the whatever you call the staff of the regime.
[01:52:21.580 --> 01:52:33.820]  And in the interview, she said that she filed a lawsuit in their personal capacity and in
[01:52:33.820 --> 01:52:34.820]  their official capacity.
[01:52:34.820 --> 01:52:37.140]  I was wondering how you do that.
[01:52:37.140 --> 01:52:43.900]  I was thinking maybe she filed against the individuals and their personal and against
[01:52:43.900 --> 01:52:48.500]  the agencies and officials.
[01:52:48.500 --> 01:52:54.220]  You're going to need some facts or she's going to need some facts.
[01:52:54.220 --> 01:52:59.940]  A lot of what tends to happen with what you're talking about is people have feelings or they
[01:52:59.940 --> 01:53:06.660]  have a sense that something's going on and they don't have facts.
[01:53:06.660 --> 01:53:10.580]  And then when you come to the court, you've got to have facts.
[01:53:10.580 --> 01:53:16.920]  You have to be able to bring assertions of evidentiary fact, which means somebody can
[01:53:16.920 --> 01:53:21.020]  look it up and say this is true or this is not true.
[01:53:21.020 --> 01:53:25.220]  You can't just go with the broad brush.
[01:53:25.220 --> 01:53:28.260]  They're trying to do this and they're trying to do that.
[01:53:28.260 --> 01:53:29.380]  And I read about this.
[01:53:29.380 --> 01:53:31.380]  I saw this on YouTube.
[01:53:31.380 --> 01:53:33.820]  This kind of equipment exists.
[01:53:33.820 --> 01:53:36.740]  It's existed ever since 1947.
[01:53:36.740 --> 01:53:45.220]  This doesn't bring your case, doesn't move your case forward to be able to get to a win.
[01:53:45.220 --> 01:53:53.060]  All you're going to do is spend a lot of time and money spinning your wheels in court because
[01:53:53.060 --> 01:53:55.380]  you have to have facts.
[01:53:55.380 --> 01:53:58.380]  Tell me what TI is.
[01:53:58.380 --> 01:54:04.460]  TI is targeted individuals, I think.
[01:54:04.460 --> 01:54:13.220]  These are people who allegedly are being attacked by these agencies.
[01:54:13.220 --> 01:54:20.900]  Are you talking about just them singling people out for persecution or are you talking about
[01:54:20.900 --> 01:54:22.900]  some kind of equipment?
[01:54:22.900 --> 01:54:23.900]  Both.
[01:54:23.900 --> 01:54:24.900]  Persecution and equipment.
[01:54:24.900 --> 01:54:25.900]  Apparently.
[01:54:25.900 --> 01:54:32.220]  I mean, as you can see on the whole website, I was just saying to her, I was really intrigued
[01:54:32.220 --> 01:54:40.740]  by really the suing in personal capacity and official capacity.
[01:54:40.740 --> 01:54:45.580]  And that was really my question for tonight.
[01:54:45.580 --> 01:54:53.940]  But I thought she might make a good guess so she can answer some of these questions.
[01:54:53.940 --> 01:54:59.740]  Can you send me her email or some kind of leak to her website?
[01:54:59.740 --> 01:55:06.140]  Because she's gone after Victoria County.
[01:55:06.140 --> 01:55:09.100]  I got some good information to give her.
[01:55:09.100 --> 01:55:13.380]  I'm not sure if she's actually going after Victoria County.
[01:55:13.380 --> 01:55:21.460]  The pleadings I saw, the lawsuit I saw was against the big three-letter agencies, you
[01:55:21.460 --> 01:55:22.460]  know.
[01:55:22.460 --> 01:55:28.780]  Let's start with like, you know, ABC.
[01:55:28.780 --> 01:55:32.820]  But I will get her and get the contact information from the website.
[01:55:32.820 --> 01:55:42.740]  And I was wondering if you guys had any experience in filing lawsuits in both of those venues,
[01:55:42.740 --> 01:55:48.180]  you know, personally and officially, in official capacity.
[01:55:48.180 --> 01:55:51.180]  We do.
[01:55:51.180 --> 01:56:00.780]  I mean, both, I guess, so what I'm thinking is suppose I filed a lawsuit for the municipal
[01:56:00.780 --> 01:56:05.620]  court and all that other stuff, and I filed personally against the judge, but I filed
[01:56:05.620 --> 01:56:14.860]  against the city in their official capacity, would that be possible?
[01:56:14.860 --> 01:56:20.860]  The city doesn't have any personal capacity.
[01:56:20.860 --> 01:56:26.780]  It only has an official capacity because it's a legal entity that is not living.
[01:56:26.780 --> 01:56:27.780]  Yeah.
[01:56:27.780 --> 01:56:29.780]  It's a legal fiction.
[01:56:29.780 --> 01:56:30.780]  Mm-hmm.
[01:56:30.780 --> 01:56:31.780]  Right.
[01:56:31.780 --> 01:56:36.660]  So it can sue and be sued, but it doesn't have a personal capacity.
[01:56:36.660 --> 01:56:40.780]  What could I do, personal against the judge?
[01:56:40.780 --> 01:56:44.820]  Well, okay, hold on, it has immunity.
[01:56:44.820 --> 01:56:50.060]  This personal and individual capacity really goes to immunity.
[01:56:50.060 --> 01:56:54.940]  So I probably shouldn't say this on the air, they might be listening to me, they probably
[01:56:54.940 --> 01:56:56.660]  are listening to me.
[01:56:56.660 --> 01:57:06.340]  But I'm gonna sue the county I live in, and I'm gonna sue them in the state and only make
[01:57:06.340 --> 01:57:11.420]  federal claims against them.
[01:57:11.420 --> 01:57:18.660]  And it is my hope that in making the federal claims, they'll say, well, this doesn't belong
[01:57:18.660 --> 01:57:26.320]  in this court, this belongs in the federal court, and they'll remove it to the Fed.
[01:57:26.320 --> 01:57:36.380]  If you file a claim against a state or a governmental entity or agency, and they remove it to the
[01:57:36.380 --> 01:57:40.860]  Fed, they lose their immunity.
[01:57:40.860 --> 01:57:49.940]  Yeah, a little trick, you always get them on procedure.
[01:57:49.940 --> 01:57:53.940]  All right, well, that sounds great.
[01:57:53.940 --> 01:58:00.620]  I'll get you that contact information, and hopefully, maybe we can get her on, answer
[01:58:00.620 --> 01:58:02.620]  some of these questions.
[01:58:02.620 --> 01:58:07.660]  Okay, calling tomorrow night, we'll have a lot more time, and I know you hung on through
[01:58:07.660 --> 01:58:12.340]  the whole show, and I'm sorry we didn't get to you quicker.
[01:58:12.340 --> 01:58:17.700]  But yeah, I definitely want to talk to this woman, because I want to see how she sued
[01:58:17.700 --> 01:58:18.700]  them.
[01:58:18.700 --> 01:58:27.060]  If you sue a state official in the Fed under a claim that the state official violated a
[01:58:27.060 --> 01:58:35.940]  federal law or a federal constitutional right, the state cannot indemnify them as that would
[01:58:35.940 --> 01:58:40.380]  breach the supremacy clause of the federal constitution.
[01:58:40.380 --> 01:58:44.380]  That's the way I went after all the highest judges in Texas.
[01:58:44.380 --> 01:58:45.380]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:45.380 --> 01:58:46.380]  We'll be back tomorrow night.
[01:58:46.380 --> 01:58:47.380]  All right.
[01:58:47.380 --> 01:58:48.380]  Thanks, guys.
[01:58:48.380 --> 01:58:50.060]  Thank you for your time.
[01:58:50.060 --> 01:58:52.260]  Xue, it was awesome talking to you again.
[01:58:52.260 --> 01:58:53.660]  Yes, it was very nice to hear.
[01:58:53.660 --> 01:58:54.660]  The federal justice에Illegible statute.
[01:58:54.660 --> 01:58:57.020]  It says in the statute, the right
[01:58:57.020 --> 01:59:02.260]  That will help rhetoric favor.
[01:59:02.260 --> 01:59:08.820]  We're going to do that tomorrow.
[01:59:08.820 --> 01:59:17.860]  copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online
[01:59:17.860 --> 01:59:26.020]  at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.020 --> 01:59:31.540]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you
[01:59:31.540 --> 01:59:36.340]  can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll
[01:59:36.340 --> 01:59:48.980]  free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.