ROL_2023-08-03_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.640]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.640 --> 00:09.080]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.080 --> 00:10.560]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.560 --> 00:14.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.460 --> 00:17.360]  one of your constitutional rights.
[00:17.360 --> 00:18.960]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.960 --> 00:22.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.560 --> 00:27.320]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.320 --> 00:28.760]  So protect your rights.
[00:28.760 --> 00:32.520]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.520 --> 00:33.520]  Privacy.
[00:33.520 --> 00:35.080]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:35.080 --> 00:39.360]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:39.360 --> 00:42.920]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.920 --> 00:46.240]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:46.240 --> 00:49.800]  Most of us know that taking the fifth means you're choosing to remain silent about a
[00:49.800 --> 00:50.800]  criminal matter.
[00:50.800 --> 00:55.040]  It's a good way to remember that the Fifth Amendment spells out what can and can't happen
[00:55.040 --> 00:57.600]  to you when you're accused of a criminal offense.
[00:57.600 --> 01:01.860]  The Fifth guarantees due process, prohibits trying someone more than once for the same
[01:01.860 --> 01:04.440]  crime and lets you keep your mouth shut.
[01:04.440 --> 01:09.560]  The Founding Fathers inserted these constitutional provisions to protect citizens from torture.
[01:09.560 --> 01:14.000]  Back in the day, governments often used painful methods to extract confessions.
[01:14.000 --> 01:17.960]  The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the government from taking your house and land without paying
[01:17.960 --> 01:18.960]  you for it.
[01:18.960 --> 01:20.200]  That used to happen a lot too.
[01:20.200 --> 01:22.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.080 --> 01:32.040]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32.040 --> 01:35.800]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:35.800 --> 01:39.440]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:39.440 --> 01:40.920]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:40.920 --> 01:44.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:44.800 --> 01:47.800]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:47.800 --> 01:49.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:49.400 --> 01:53.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:57.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57.760 --> 02:02.920]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:02.920 --> 02:05.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:05.520 --> 02:09.820]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:09.820 --> 02:13.360]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.360 --> 02:15.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.040 --> 02:19.080]  The number 666 reminds me of evil.
[02:19.080 --> 02:23.360]  I also associate it with the sick feeling one might get when falsely accused of a heinous
[02:23.360 --> 02:28.280]  crime or when thinking about sickos who actually do commit acts of murder and mayhem.
[02:28.280 --> 02:33.880]  Either way, the number 666 can help you remember that the Sixth Amendment deals with the constitutionally
[02:33.880 --> 02:37.160]  guaranteed rights Americans have in a criminal trial.
[02:37.160 --> 02:41.440]  Those include the right to a speedy public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the
[02:41.440 --> 02:45.460]  right to full information about the charges, the right to an attorney, and the right to
[02:45.460 --> 02:48.040]  confront any witnesses face to face.
[02:48.040 --> 02:51.800]  666, sick, sickos, and the Sixth Amendment.
[02:51.800 --> 02:52.800]  Get it?
[02:52.800 --> 02:54.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:54.000 --> 03:22.920]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:25.000 --> 03:26.000]  Okay.
[03:26.000 --> 03:27.000]  Howdy, howdy.
[03:27.000 --> 03:28.000]  Randy Compton.
[03:28.000 --> 03:29.000]  Brett Fountain.
[03:29.000 --> 03:30.000]  Rita LaRachel.
[03:30.000 --> 03:31.000]  On this, the, what is it?
[03:31.000 --> 03:32.000]  October.
[03:32.000 --> 03:41.760]  I don't have Brett here today, so I have to do everything myself.
[03:41.760 --> 03:49.800]  It is the third day of August, Thursday, the third day of August, 2023.
[03:49.800 --> 03:51.760]  And I'm turning the phone lines on.
[03:51.760 --> 03:56.880]  I call in number 512-646-1984.
[03:56.880 --> 04:00.800]  Brett is not here yet, but he should be here shortly.
[04:00.800 --> 04:04.080]  I'm going to start out with a little brief.
[04:04.080 --> 04:11.240]  I keep telling about what I'm doing, but I hope everybody gets how important this could
[04:11.240 --> 04:12.880]  be.
[04:12.880 --> 04:19.680]  We have a lot of people griping and complaining about how unjust the system is.
[04:19.680 --> 04:27.760]  We go down and we protest and we shake our fist in the air and wail in righteous indignation
[04:27.760 --> 04:30.960]  and nothing changes.
[04:30.960 --> 04:38.480]  So I've been a long time trying to figure out how to make change happen.
[04:38.480 --> 04:46.000]  And you know, there's probably not anything you guys can think of that I haven't tried.
[04:46.000 --> 04:53.320]  Some things you could think of and you probably wouldn't try that accounts for three dislocated
[04:53.320 --> 04:59.400]  ribs, two broken collarbones, a chipped elbow and tooth knocked out, and got sentenced to
[04:59.400 --> 05:04.760]  a year in jail once, didn't spend that year, but got sentenced to it, all for trying to
[05:04.760 --> 05:08.760]  figure out how to fix this stuff.
[05:08.760 --> 05:15.240]  And turns out you're not going to be able to fix it through the normal channels.
[05:15.240 --> 05:20.880]  You certainly can't go to them and show them what's wrong and expect them to change what
[05:20.880 --> 05:23.720]  they're doing to fix it.
[05:23.720 --> 05:29.800]  They're going to do what they were trained to do, the way they were trained to do it.
[05:29.800 --> 05:33.120]  And it doesn't matter what you show them.
[05:33.120 --> 05:36.760]  It doesn't matter how much law and how much fact you have.
[05:36.760 --> 05:40.880]  They're going to do what they were told to do.
[05:40.880 --> 05:43.360]  Sound familiar?
[05:43.360 --> 05:46.320]  Nuremberg.
[05:46.320 --> 05:48.240]  They were just doing what they were told.
[05:48.240 --> 05:52.840]  Well, that's what's going on here.
[05:52.840 --> 05:58.400]  Except I think Texas is the worst police state to Germany was.
[05:58.400 --> 06:03.520]  Germany was pretty bad, but they tend to focus their badness on one group of people, not
[06:03.520 --> 06:07.120]  everybody.
[06:07.120 --> 06:18.720]  China incarcerates approximately 121 persons per 100,000, Russia 357, the United States
[06:18.720 --> 06:27.880]  as a whole 657, Texas 840 and climbing fast.
[06:27.880 --> 06:34.600]  We're almost four times communist China.
[06:34.600 --> 06:38.880]  We should be ashamed of ourselves.
[06:38.880 --> 06:44.920]  And at the end of the day, you can't blame the police.
[06:44.920 --> 06:53.400]  I know everybody wants to blame the police, but while the police are a problem, the police
[06:53.400 --> 06:57.800]  are not the problem.
[06:57.800 --> 07:09.480]  Lawyers are a problem, judges, magistrates, clerks, lawyers, none of them are the problem.
[07:09.480 --> 07:12.920]  You are the problem.
[07:12.920 --> 07:20.380]  And I am the problem because we didn't do what we were able to do to fix it.
[07:20.380 --> 07:24.440]  We are the ones that have the power to fix it.
[07:24.440 --> 07:30.560]  Three different times I had a sheriff's deputy called me over the years and asked me if there
[07:30.560 --> 07:35.200]  was something I could do to help them get rid of a deputy who was making them all look
[07:35.200 --> 07:36.200]  bad.
[07:36.200 --> 07:41.800]  The guy was trouble, he was a problem.
[07:41.800 --> 07:46.280]  And they couldn't do anything about it because they're stuck inside the system.
[07:46.280 --> 07:50.880]  But I was outside the system and they knew I could do something about it.
[07:50.880 --> 07:59.960]  Guys, we're outside the system and there is something we can do about it.
[07:59.960 --> 08:06.680]  When I was in the military, if a general was coming to the base, we had to pick up every
[08:06.680 --> 08:13.480]  cigarette butt, cut every piece of grass exactly perfect, paint every stripe, everything had
[08:13.480 --> 08:16.360]  to be perfect.
[08:16.360 --> 08:23.160]  And the only person on a military base that we were more afraid of than a general was
[08:23.160 --> 08:26.440]  a civilian.
[08:26.440 --> 08:35.240]  Most of the civilians were absolutely no concern, but there is just going to be one out there.
[08:35.240 --> 08:41.920]  And a civilian is the only one who can march into the general's office and crawl down his
[08:41.920 --> 08:44.320]  throat.
[08:44.320 --> 08:53.840]  And all the general can say is yes, sir, no, sir, because the general knows full well that
[08:53.840 --> 08:58.840]  he answers to the civilian, he answers to every civilian.
[08:58.840 --> 09:02.960]  He's not gonna like being chewed out.
[09:02.960 --> 09:08.480]  That's how we could make change in the military, that's how we can make change here.
[09:08.480 --> 09:13.060]  I sued all the highest judges in Texas.
[09:13.060 --> 09:15.560]  Everything was wrong.
[09:15.560 --> 09:20.120]  I have shown everybody on this show how it's wrong over and over.
[09:20.120 --> 09:27.160]  I've shown public officials over and over and made no difference, they don't care.
[09:27.160 --> 09:30.840]  Public officials are gonna do things the way they do things because that's the way they've
[09:30.840 --> 09:33.760]  been trained to do things.
[09:33.760 --> 09:38.960]  Makes no difference how much law, how much reason I show them.
[09:38.960 --> 09:46.560]  They're gonna do things the way they were trained to do things, so how do we fix it?
[09:46.560 --> 09:55.320]  Well I sued them, I sued the ones doing the training, and the ones doing the training
[09:55.320 --> 10:00.540]  turned out to be all the highest judges in Texas.
[10:00.540 --> 10:08.360]  They were commanded by the legislature by 17.024 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure to
[10:08.360 --> 10:14.140]  prepare a curriculum for magistrates in the setting of bail and other duties, where actually
[10:14.140 --> 10:20.080]  the Office of Court Administration and Administrative Office was required to do that.
[10:20.080 --> 10:26.360]  But they were required to do that in consultation with the Office of Court Administration.
[10:26.360 --> 10:27.720]  I'm sorry.
[10:27.720 --> 10:33.280]  They were required to do that in conjunction with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,
[10:33.280 --> 10:38.040]  the highest criminal court in Texas.
[10:38.040 --> 10:39.480]  And so what do you call that?
[10:39.480 --> 10:42.840]  What if they do that wrong?
[10:42.840 --> 10:44.840]  What crime is that?
[10:44.840 --> 10:54.080]  Well it's not exactly, it is a crime, but it's not a state crime that I know of.
[10:54.080 --> 10:57.160]  Well maybe it is.
[10:57.160 --> 11:03.520]  It's not them performing a function of their office.
[11:03.520 --> 11:09.740]  If they improperly trained magistrates and other public officials.
[11:09.740 --> 11:19.920]  The only way I could wrap the law around that is to consider it like a couple of guys get
[11:19.920 --> 11:27.280]  together and they decide to go down and rob a convenience store.
[11:27.280 --> 11:35.360]  Now them discussing robbing the convenience store, that's not construed as a consultation.
[11:35.360 --> 11:41.340]  That's construed as a criminal conspiracy.
[11:41.340 --> 11:48.880]  So I looked at what the courts were commanded to do and then looked at what they actually
[11:48.880 --> 11:53.000]  did and that came up a criminal conspiracy.
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.480]  So I sued them for it.
[11:55.480 --> 11:59.440]  I accused them all, all of the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals because they were
[11:59.440 --> 12:03.960]  required to consult with the Office of Court Administration.
[12:03.960 --> 12:16.360]  And I had one, it turned out something I didn't know about that the defendant told me, Lavie,
[12:16.360 --> 12:23.520]  L-A-V-O-I-E, I think that's Lavie.
[12:23.520 --> 12:34.760]  She is the head of the Office of Court Administration, I sued her and she asserted immunity because
[12:34.760 --> 12:45.080]  under government code 27 something or other, the Office of the Supreme Court, primarily
[12:45.080 --> 12:51.580]  the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is required to direct her in the operation of
[12:51.580 --> 12:54.360]  her office.
[12:54.360 --> 13:00.280]  So when I answered her, she filed a, all of them filed a Rule 12 motion to dismiss because
[13:00.280 --> 13:02.080]  filed in the Fed.
[13:02.080 --> 13:09.080]  When I answered hers, I noted to the court that it seems that Miss Laveau intends to
[13:09.080 --> 13:16.960]  throw defendant Nathan Hetch, Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme, under the bus.
[13:16.960 --> 13:22.080]  She's blaming him for what she did.
[13:22.080 --> 13:30.480]  So when I filed a bended appeal, which I'll almost certainly have to, I'll file against
[13:30.480 --> 13:39.520]  Nathan Hetch for conspiring with the Office of Court Administration to false training.
[13:39.520 --> 13:47.360]  Now this is a state of 29 million people.
[13:47.360 --> 13:55.680]  How many people do you imagine in Texas are happy and satisfied with the police and the
[13:55.680 --> 13:59.480]  criminal justice system?
[13:59.480 --> 14:07.880]  I'm sure there's some that are, but those will be the ones who've never had any interaction
[14:07.880 --> 14:11.480]  with the criminal justice system.
[14:11.480 --> 14:23.100]  So the question becomes, why am I the only one when the governor issued all of these
[14:23.100 --> 14:29.240]  just outrageously and patently illegal executive orders?
[14:29.240 --> 14:34.800]  Everybody jumped up and down, railed righteous indignation about it, but only one person
[14:34.800 --> 14:44.360]  did something, and it only took one person.
[14:44.360 --> 14:47.800]  I live on social security.
[14:47.800 --> 14:51.680]  I am nobody.
[14:51.680 --> 14:57.140]  I'm not rich, I'm not powerful, I don't move in high circles.
[14:57.140 --> 15:02.840]  I'm about as nobody as you can get.
[15:02.840 --> 15:07.600]  And as soon as my complaints went to the grand jury, the governor rescinded all of his executive
[15:07.600 --> 15:09.160]  orders immediately.
[15:09.160 --> 15:12.160]  We should learn from that.
[15:12.160 --> 15:17.920]  How many people out here do I have listening from Texas?
[15:17.920 --> 15:26.240]  And if I could get 1% of the people in Texas listening to this radio show to sue all the
[15:26.240 --> 15:36.160]  highest judges in Texas, how long do you think it would take them to get things changed?
[15:36.160 --> 15:37.640]  I've got every one of them.
[15:37.640 --> 15:42.800]  They've hired lawyers and they're jumping up and down and trying to find a way out from
[15:42.800 --> 15:44.980]  under my lawsuit.
[15:44.980 --> 15:51.240]  And they're all arguing that they have an absolute immunity or qualified immunity and
[15:51.240 --> 15:54.380]  blah, blah, blah.
[15:54.380 --> 16:06.360]  But I sued them in the Fed, and I accused them of conspiring to deny myself, my co-plaintiff,
[16:06.360 --> 16:12.040]  and all others similarly situated in the due course of the laws and violations of the Fourteenth
[16:12.040 --> 16:15.440]  Amendment.
[16:15.440 --> 16:25.920]  And I had friends send me some case law, the Young Doctrine, this is a 1908 case, but it's
[16:25.920 --> 16:27.520]  still very good law.
[16:27.520 --> 16:37.000]  The state has no power to impart to its officer immunity from responsibility to the Supreme
[16:37.000 --> 16:40.000]  Court of the United States.
[16:40.000 --> 16:48.640]  If you violate a federal law while acting as a public official, you have zero immunity.
[16:48.640 --> 17:00.520]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[17:00.520 --> 17:05.280]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:05.280 --> 17:06.520]  of nutrition.
[17:06.520 --> 17:10.400]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all
[17:10.400 --> 17:11.400]  that.
[17:11.400 --> 17:16.960]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:16.960 --> 17:23.320]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[17:23.320 --> 17:25.560]  provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.560 --> 17:30.400]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.400 --> 17:31.520]  we reject.
[17:31.520 --> 17:36.760]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.760 --> 17:39.960]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.960 --> 17:45.880]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:45.880 --> 17:47.520]  quality radio.
[17:47.520 --> 17:51.880]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.880 --> 17:57.120]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:57.120 --> 17:59.080]  increase your income.
[17:59.080 --> 18:00.080]  Order now.
[18:00.080 --> 18:05.640]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[18:05.640 --> 18:06.640]  Word?
[18:06.640 --> 18:11.760]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for Scripture
[18:11.760 --> 18:18.160]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[18:18.160 --> 18:22.680]  Study to show thy self-approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[18:22.680 --> 18:25.080]  dividing the word of truth.
[18:25.080 --> 18:28.720]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[18:28.720 --> 18:32.400]  verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[18:32.400 --> 18:37.040]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[18:37.040 --> 18:39.440]  and Christian character development.
[18:39.440 --> 18:43.960]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:43.960 --> 18:48.240]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.240 --> 18:50.520]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[18:50.520 --> 18:57.160]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[18:57.160 --> 18:59.160]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[19:27.160 --> 19:48.000]  I'm going to quit preaching now and just hoping I can motivate somebody else who feels
[19:48.000 --> 20:00.720]  like they have been unjustly treated by the local constabulary to look for claims they
[20:00.720 --> 20:10.520]  could make in the Fed and ensue these guys in the Fed with the Young Doctrine.
[20:10.520 --> 20:18.820]  The Young Doctrine is a 1908 case, but I ran it on case text and had it search for similar
[20:18.820 --> 20:31.820]  cases and it searched for the term in Ray Young, and it had over 4,000 hits.
[20:31.820 --> 20:39.320]  That means the Young Doctrine is still good law, and it is very definitive.
[20:39.320 --> 20:47.880]  It is the open door, similar to what I've been talking about on the show, 39.03 penal
[20:47.880 --> 20:55.640]  code, official misconduct or official oppression, official oppression in Texas, official misconduct
[20:55.640 --> 20:56.920]  in most states.
[20:56.920 --> 21:05.400]  Every state has a corresponding statute because that statute reflects 18 U.S. Code 242, the
[21:05.400 --> 21:11.720]  Ku Klux Klan Act that makes it a crime for a public official to exert a report to exert
[21:11.720 --> 21:18.520]  an authority they do not expressly have and in the process deny a citizen full free access
[21:18.520 --> 21:23.000]  to or enjoyment of right.
[21:23.000 --> 21:27.480]  That's one I've been pushing, and that's something we can all go after them criminally
[21:27.480 --> 21:28.480]  with.
[21:28.480 --> 21:32.120]  For all this time we've been trying to go after them criminally, and I went down and
[21:32.120 --> 21:36.200]  I've really annoyed the crap out of them, but in the end of the day it didn't make
[21:36.200 --> 21:37.800]  any difference.
[21:37.800 --> 21:43.360]  I annoyed them for a while and they went back doing the same thing they were doing.
[21:43.360 --> 21:50.400]  It appears the way to get their attention is to sue them personally.
[21:50.400 --> 21:58.320]  I have all nine judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, they made the mistake of getting
[21:58.320 --> 22:05.720]  the attorney general to respond to their suit, and that raises a question.
[22:05.720 --> 22:10.240]  I sued them in their personal capacity.
[22:10.240 --> 22:19.920]  What is the attorney general doing using taxpayer funds to defend them in a personal lawsuit?
[22:19.920 --> 22:28.240]  Question I'll get to later, but do you imagine that the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals
[22:28.240 --> 22:31.000]  are paying attention yet?
[22:31.000 --> 22:35.640]  I sued each one of them for $20 million.
[22:35.640 --> 22:38.720]  You think I got their attention?
[22:38.720 --> 22:42.800]  I sued them in their personal capacity.
[22:42.800 --> 22:48.760]  The idea was is to have them read the pleading.
[22:48.760 --> 22:55.000]  I could go in and explain how this bad stuff is happening until I'm blue in the face and
[22:55.000 --> 22:58.020]  nobody's going to pay any attention.
[22:58.020 --> 23:04.780]  But if I get the highest judges in Texas, ones that give the final ruling to all issues
[23:04.780 --> 23:14.240]  on due process, if I get them to read my pleadings trying to figure out how to get out from under
[23:14.240 --> 23:26.720]  my claims against them, then they get exposed to exactly how the system is supposed to work.
[23:26.720 --> 23:35.280]  And win, lose, or draw, that's going to stick in their brains because I got their attention.
[23:35.280 --> 23:42.440]  My daddy sold a horse to a next door neighbor, a mule, and told him it's a great mule and
[23:42.440 --> 23:43.440]  don't abuse it.
[23:43.440 --> 23:47.320]  Well, he couldn't get the mule to work, so he called my dad, and my dad went over there,
[23:47.320 --> 23:51.080]  picked up a tube for it, and he hit him right behind the ear with the tube for it, and the
[23:51.080 --> 23:52.080]  mule took right off.
[23:52.080 --> 23:55.200]  And the guy said, I thought you said not to abuse that mule.
[23:55.200 --> 24:01.240]  He said, I wasn't abusing the mule, you just got to get his attention.
[24:01.240 --> 24:07.960]  Well, I think that's all we have to do to get things to change.
[24:07.960 --> 24:20.000]  I suspect we will find out very soon if these judges don't get past the Rule 12 motion to
[24:20.000 --> 24:27.480]  dismiss, these guys are going to be dancing on their tippy toes, and they hired lawyers.
[24:27.480 --> 24:31.800]  They got the attorney general to answer for the judges, and some of the other litigants
[24:31.800 --> 24:38.520]  were smart enough to hire their own lawyers, but it didn't make any difference.
[24:38.520 --> 24:47.760]  All of the responses I got were disappointingly inept.
[24:47.760 --> 24:52.720]  All they could do was argue state immunity.
[24:52.720 --> 24:57.800]  Not one of them touched the young doctrine.
[24:57.800 --> 25:02.840]  They didn't get close to it, and they did everything they could to avoid the claim I
[25:02.840 --> 25:05.640]  brought against them.
[25:05.640 --> 25:09.800]  Most of them, one of them mentioned it, all the rest of them didn't mention the federal
[25:09.800 --> 25:13.880]  claim at all.
[25:13.880 --> 25:17.800]  So the responses were incredibly inept.
[25:17.800 --> 25:26.120]  I was hoping for some really good responses to tell me how to build my amended pleading,
[25:26.120 --> 25:31.320]  because I expect them to rule against me, and then I'll have to file an amended pleading.
[25:31.320 --> 25:36.160]  And I wanted them to give me all the good arguments that I needed to address when I
[25:36.160 --> 25:37.160]  amended the pleading.
[25:37.160 --> 25:41.000]  They didn't give me dilly squat.
[25:41.000 --> 25:47.720]  The thing is, guys, these folks are not as smart as we tend to think they are, or maybe
[25:47.720 --> 25:52.000]  they are, but they're not as capable as we expect them to be.
[25:52.000 --> 25:54.840]  You can take them on.
[25:54.840 --> 26:00.280]  Okay, I'm going to quit preaching now, and I'm going to go to Bretton, Alabama.
[26:00.280 --> 26:01.280]  Hello, Bretton, Alabama.
[26:01.280 --> 26:02.280]  Hey, Randy.
[26:02.280 --> 26:03.280]  How you doing?
[26:03.280 --> 26:04.280]  I'm doing good.
[26:04.280 --> 26:05.280]  What do you have for us today?
[26:05.280 --> 26:14.000]  I got to tell you, Scott sent me here tonight.
[26:14.000 --> 26:16.120]  Don't hold that against me.
[26:16.120 --> 26:17.120]  Scott Richardson?
[26:17.120 --> 26:18.120]  Yes, sir.
[26:18.120 --> 26:19.120]  Oh, that chump.
[26:19.120 --> 26:28.120]  I've got that case still going on from like three years ago of the lights.
[26:28.120 --> 26:31.600]  Remember, I was telling you, I've called you several times, telling you about I was
[26:31.600 --> 26:36.840]  stopped in daytime for my daytime running light, and the trooper made up interfering
[26:36.840 --> 26:43.000]  with government operations, resisting arrest, LEDs, and no driver's license.
[26:43.000 --> 26:46.880]  Wait a minute.
[26:46.880 --> 26:47.880]  Okay.
[26:47.880 --> 26:48.880]  LEDs?
[26:48.880 --> 26:51.800]  Yes, sir.
[26:51.800 --> 26:52.800]  What's that mean?
[26:52.800 --> 26:57.200]  LED light.
[26:57.200 --> 26:58.200]  In the daytime?
[26:58.200 --> 26:59.200]  Yes, sir.
[26:59.200 --> 27:01.520]  They were daytime running lights.
[27:01.520 --> 27:05.680]  Is there a law against having your lights on in the daytime?
[27:05.680 --> 27:08.640]  No, sir.
[27:08.640 --> 27:15.880]  Because I've got a 0302 avalanche, and I cannot turn the headlights off.
[27:15.880 --> 27:17.880]  Right, yes.
[27:17.880 --> 27:20.760]  Yeah, they're on all the time.
[27:20.760 --> 27:27.280]  So have you sued the crap hole out of them yet?
[27:27.280 --> 27:30.240]  Well, I'm trying.
[27:30.240 --> 27:34.120]  I talked to a civil rights attorney, and he says that I have to get the case dismissed
[27:34.120 --> 27:36.760]  to sue anybody about this.
[27:36.760 --> 27:42.400]  The Supreme Court has recently issued a ruling that says that is no longer the case.
[27:42.400 --> 27:44.600]  Oh, really?
[27:44.600 --> 27:45.600]  Yep.
[27:45.600 --> 27:46.600]  Okay.
[27:46.600 --> 27:53.080]  Well, about approximately two years ago, I went to a trial over this, and the judge here
[27:53.080 --> 27:55.880]  found me guilty by his opinion, he said.
[27:55.880 --> 28:01.120]  His opinion was I was in violation of the light, so therefore I'm guilty of all the
[28:01.120 --> 28:02.120]  charges.
[28:02.120 --> 28:07.120]  He sent me straight to jail for 12 months for interfering with government operations
[28:07.120 --> 28:10.720]  and six months for resisting arrest.
[28:10.720 --> 28:15.120]  The next month, bail bonds been filed in the appeal and got me out of jail, and I've been
[28:15.120 --> 28:17.920]  waiting all this time for a jury trial.
[28:17.920 --> 28:24.680]  Now the seventh, which is Monday, I have a suppressions hearing coming up.
[28:24.680 --> 28:29.280]  Now my attorney called me today, and he said that the district attorney in them decided
[28:29.280 --> 28:34.520]  that they're going to say that the police officer's probable cause to stop me on that
[28:34.520 --> 28:42.600]  day was I was speeding, which I never received a speeding ticket at all.
[28:42.600 --> 28:46.120]  He never even mentioned speeding when he stopped me.
[28:46.120 --> 28:49.480]  Now on the body cam that I did receive when I went to my trial-
[28:49.480 --> 29:00.080]  Wait, did they give you a preliminary hearing before a magistrate?
[29:00.080 --> 29:06.760]  Only the trial, the arraignment when I pleaded, which I didn't plead, the judge ended up
[29:06.760 --> 29:09.760]  pleading for me.
[29:09.760 --> 29:18.840]  Okay, if they did not give you a preliminary hearing, let me look up Gerstein Pugh.
[29:18.840 --> 29:29.440]  Gerstein Pugh is the primary case on a preliminary hearing, and that's a federal requirement.
[29:29.440 --> 29:37.840]  And your federal rule of civil procedure, criminal procedure 5.1 defines what they're
[29:37.840 --> 29:46.720]  to do in a preliminary hearing, is what we in Texas call an examining trial.
[29:46.720 --> 29:51.240]  That's why I sued all these guys, because they didn't do that.
[29:51.240 --> 30:01.840]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:01.840 --> 30:05.960]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:05.960 --> 30:10.680]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your
[30:10.680 --> 30:11.680]  secrets.
[30:11.680 --> 30:15.860]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details.
[30:15.860 --> 30:17.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.440 --> 30:21.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.040 --> 30:25.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.840 --> 30:31.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.040 --> 30:33.580]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.580 --> 30:37.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.880 --> 30:41.420]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.420 --> 30:45.080]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.080 --> 30:49.880]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:49.880 --> 30:51.720]  your personal information.
[30:51.720 --> 30:54.360]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.360 --> 30:55.720]  It's not an idle question.
[30:55.720 --> 31:01.600]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of US companies admit their security was breached
[31:01.600 --> 31:03.920]  by hackers in the last year.
[31:03.920 --> 31:07.160]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:07.160 --> 31:12.080]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:12.080 --> 31:15.480]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals
[31:15.480 --> 31:16.480]  to see.
[31:16.480 --> 31:17.680]  The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.680 --> 31:21.080]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.080 --> 31:23.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.040 --> 31:52.840]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.840 --> 31:54.320]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:54.320 --> 31:55.320]  My uncle.
[31:55.320 --> 31:56.320]  My nephew.
[31:56.320 --> 31:57.320]  My son.
[31:57.320 --> 31:58.320]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:58.320 --> 31:59.320]  Why it fell.
[31:59.320 --> 32:00.320]  Why it matters.
[32:00.320 --> 32:01.320]  And what you can do.
[32:01.320 --> 32:05.280]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.280 --> 32:09.080]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[32:09.080 --> 32:12.680]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.680 --> 32:16.240]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.240 --> 32:20.280]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.280 --> 32:24.160]  Public courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.160 --> 32:25.520]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.520 --> 32:29.520]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.520 --> 32:33.280]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.280 --> 32:35.680]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.680 --> 32:39.680]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.680 --> 32:41.000]  ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:44.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.200 --> 32:48.760]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.760 --> 32:51.040]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.040 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:00.600]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.600 --> 33:06.240]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:06.240 --> 33:19.760]  Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the law in the hand.
[33:19.760 --> 33:33.760]  Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:33.760 --> 33:43.760]  When you're gonna stop abuse, your power.
[33:43.760 --> 33:58.760]  When you're gonna stop abuse, your power.
[33:58.760 --> 34:01.760]  Officers not to abuse their power
[34:01.760 --> 34:07.760]  Send a request to the leader, the captain of all officers
[34:07.760 --> 34:12.760]  Tell them to uphold the law, and please don't abuse their power
[34:12.760 --> 34:18.760]  They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour
[34:18.760 --> 34:23.760]  So Mr. Officers, please stop abusing your power
[34:23.760 --> 34:28.760]  You pull me over and tell me to be silent, sir
[34:28.760 --> 34:34.760]  I need to speak to my lawyer, Mr. Officer
[34:34.760 --> 34:39.760]  You acting like you're the judge, finding me guilty, sir
[34:39.760 --> 34:45.760]  So when you gonna stop abusing your power
[34:45.760 --> 34:51.760]  When you gonna stop abusing your power
[34:51.760 --> 34:56.760]  When you gonna stop abusing your power
[34:56.760 --> 35:23.760]  When you gonna stop abusing your power
[35:23.760 --> 35:26.760]  Assume for false arrest
[35:26.760 --> 35:28.760]  No, I'm not familiar with that
[35:28.760 --> 35:32.760]  This was just a few months ago, very recent
[35:32.760 --> 35:36.760]  We got Brett in Alabama
[35:36.760 --> 35:40.760]  And that's what they did to him
[35:40.760 --> 35:43.760]  And they're in the prosecutor, they're prosecuting him
[35:43.760 --> 35:48.760]  So Brett, I take it you're gonna get a new trial with a jury this time?
[35:48.760 --> 35:53.760]  Yes, sir, it's supposed to start the 14th, I believe it is
[35:53.760 --> 36:00.760]  Okay, do you have all the statements from the officer and everything, all your discovery?
[36:00.760 --> 36:06.760]  My attorney has it, but all along my attorney's been trying to just throw me under the bus
[36:06.760 --> 36:12.760]  They're trying to get me to plead guilty to interfere with government operations and they'll drop everything else
[36:12.760 --> 36:19.760]  But that is up to one year in jail there, a bunch of fines, and I really am not a criminal
[36:19.760 --> 36:22.760]  I really don't like a criminal record going
[36:22.760 --> 36:33.760]  Yeah, well what if you were to make up some discovery requests of your own and have your lawyer send it over?
[36:33.760 --> 36:42.760]  You could even send it over yourself, but it's not going to be respected as easily if your lawyer doesn't send it
[36:42.760 --> 36:47.760]  If he says he doesn't want to cooperate and send your discovery over, well then you bar grade him
[36:47.760 --> 36:50.760]  So have him send it to me?
[36:50.760 --> 37:00.760]  No, no, the discovery requests that you need in order to get the exculpatory facts that is admissible evidence
[37:00.760 --> 37:07.760]  Gotcha, I did get that at the trial, but after they put me in jail over that and I got out and I hired this attorney then
[37:07.760 --> 37:11.760]  I gave him everything I had on all that
[37:11.760 --> 37:13.760]  Okay, but you
[37:13.760 --> 37:15.760]  Sorry, go ahead
[37:15.760 --> 37:18.760]  Did you not keep a copy?
[37:18.760 --> 37:25.760]  I did, but it's been like two years ago and I moved since then and I just misplaced my paperwork
[37:25.760 --> 37:33.760]  Okay, what I would like you to do is take the phone and beat yourself around the eyes and the ears
[37:33.760 --> 37:36.760]  I might not hear you then
[37:36.760 --> 37:44.760]  Okay, how much jail time were they going to give you on the deal?
[37:44.760 --> 37:53.760]  It's 12 months for interfering, but originally they gave me 12 months for that and six months for resisting
[37:53.760 --> 38:02.760]  Now they said today, my attorney did say that they're saying that they're going to use speeding for the probable cause to have stopped me
[38:02.760 --> 38:08.760]  But they never issued me a speeding ticket and he never even mentioned speeding when he did stop
[38:08.760 --> 38:14.760]  I've got it all recorded on my phone and plus the body camera even from the police officer has it
[38:14.760 --> 38:25.760]  Mark, have you asked your attorney to request the evidence of speeding?
[38:25.760 --> 38:32.760]  It did show on the body camera that when the police officer was following behind me when he turned around on the highway to catch me
[38:32.760 --> 38:40.760]  It showed on his radar that I was doing 68 in a 65 zone if it was pointing on me, which it looked like it was
[38:40.760 --> 38:44.760]  But to my understanding the radar can be off plus three or three miles
[38:44.760 --> 38:50.760]  No, you can't you won't be able to argue the radar but yeah, it can be off that much
[38:50.760 --> 39:00.760]  The radar can be perfect and can still radar is subject to atmospheric conditions
[39:00.760 --> 39:05.760]  Radar can clock a bird passing in between the two of you
[39:05.760 --> 39:11.760]  There's a lot of things the radar can do but if it's showing you 68 in a 65
[39:11.760 --> 39:15.760]  Yes, that's not enough
[39:15.760 --> 39:22.760]  So I hate to tell you to do something that'll get you in jail
[39:22.760 --> 39:27.760]  But your best deal is going to come on the courthouse steps
[39:27.760 --> 39:29.760]  At the jury trial?
[39:29.760 --> 39:40.760]  Yeah, especially if you've got a jury trial and you may need to beat up your lawyer before you get to the jury trial
[39:40.760 --> 39:45.760]  Originally he tried to get me to do the pretrial diversion and I read through the stipulations of that
[39:45.760 --> 39:49.760]  And it was just way too much they wanted out of me to even think about that
[39:49.760 --> 39:55.760]  And then he's trying to get me to go along with that interfering with the government operations deal
[39:55.760 --> 40:03.760]  What you got to tell your lawyer is you're absolutely not going to agree to anything
[40:03.760 --> 40:10.760]  Yeah, because you're swearing to tell the truth and the whole truth and nothing but the truth that doesn't involve any guilt
[40:10.760 --> 40:15.760]  When you get to the courthouse steps they'll make their best offer
[40:15.760 --> 40:18.760]  Yeah, and I've told him all along that all I want is it dismissed
[40:18.760 --> 40:25.760]  I told him the police officers get up there and they start lying on the stand and we need to charge them for perjury
[40:25.760 --> 40:30.760]  Okay, now you need to force your lawyer to do something he's not going to want to do
[40:30.760 --> 40:34.760]  And when he doesn't do it then you bargrieve your lawyer
[40:34.760 --> 40:40.760]  And when you bargrieve the lawyer he's going to file a motion to withdraw and you're going to file an objection
[40:40.760 --> 40:46.760]  Tell the judge he's my counsel of choice and you're not to interfere with my contract with him
[40:46.760 --> 40:50.760]  And then the judge is very unlikely to let him withdraw
[40:50.760 --> 40:58.760]  And if he does then you ask the judge to appoint you counsel of your choice
[40:58.760 --> 41:04.760]  And have the name of the most expensive lawyer in the jurisdiction
[41:04.760 --> 41:13.760]  Since you've taken away my lawyer you have to give me my lawyer the lawyer of choice and I want this one
[41:13.760 --> 41:24.760]  But I'm almost certainly that if you object to your lawyer withdrawing the judge is not going to allow him to withdraw
[41:24.760 --> 41:28.760]  Now you got the lawyer by the testicles
[41:28.760 --> 41:38.760]  Now he goes to the other side and says hey guys I got a difficult client here he's going to ruin my career
[41:38.760 --> 41:44.760]  You got to help me out I'll pay you back on the next sucker we get in
[41:44.760 --> 41:48.760]  And then get your lawyer on your side
[41:48.760 --> 41:52.760]  And my lawyer is real tight with this judge too
[41:52.760 --> 42:01.760]  Yeah and if you bargrieve your lawyer and he files a motion to withdraw bargrieve him for that
[42:01.760 --> 42:04.760]  And that's just a complaint with the barb
[42:04.760 --> 42:08.760]  Yeah well that'll make him nuts
[42:08.760 --> 42:12.760]  And then then object like crazy to him withdrawing
[42:12.760 --> 42:18.760]  And if they let him withdraw now they can't have the trial they're going to stop everything
[42:18.760 --> 42:22.760]  Now you got to have option to get more more counsel
[42:22.760 --> 42:27.760]  And if the lawyer withdraws you demand all your everything you gave him back
[42:27.760 --> 42:35.760]  And tell the court that you can't secure counsel until he gives you your money back
[42:35.760 --> 42:37.760]  Pay him three grand
[42:37.760 --> 42:45.760]  And then demand that the judge appoint you counsel of your choice
[42:45.760 --> 42:54.760]  The Constitution doesn't specifically guarantee you the right to counsel
[42:54.760 --> 43:00.760]  That's not what he says you got to consider all the words
[43:00.760 --> 43:08.760]  It guarantees you the right to counsel of your choice
[43:08.760 --> 43:14.760]  So this is not something I come up with this is something people have done before
[43:14.760 --> 43:22.760]  If the judge allows yours to withdraw then you get to demand that he appoints you the lawyer that you want
[43:22.760 --> 43:25.760]  You get the most expensive lawyer you can find
[43:25.760 --> 43:32.760]  When you start bar grieving him he's going to get real excited and he's going to have leverage with the court
[43:32.760 --> 43:34.760]  Or she
[43:34.760 --> 43:38.760]  It's all politics at the end of the day
[43:38.760 --> 43:42.760]  But at courthouse steps they'll offer you a deal
[43:42.760 --> 43:45.760]  Mike Handel they were going to put him in jail for two years
[43:45.760 --> 43:51.760]  He told them screw you no deal absolutely not we're going to court
[43:51.760 --> 43:55.760]  Argue this in front of a jury or the courthouse steps
[43:55.760 --> 44:22.760]  They decided to dismiss the case hang on
[44:22.760 --> 44:26.760]  I'm glad you asked whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help logos
[44:26.760 --> 44:30.760]  Ordering your supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your cookies
[44:30.760 --> 44:36.760]  Now go to logos radio network.com click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it
[44:36.760 --> 44:42.760]  Now when you order anything from Amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos
[44:42.760 --> 44:44.760]  Do I pay extra? No
[44:44.760 --> 44:46.760]  Do you have to do anything different when I order? No
[44:46.760 --> 44:48.760]  Can I use my Amazon Prime? No
[44:48.760 --> 44:54.760]  I mean yes Wow giving without doing anything or spending any money this is perfect
[44:54.760 --> 44:55.760]  Thank you so much
[44:55.760 --> 44:57.760]  We are welcome
[44:57.760 --> 44:59.760]  Happy holidays logos
[44:59.760 --> 45:02.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:02.760 --> 45:06.760]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[45:06.760 --> 45:14.760]  The affordable easy to understand 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step
[45:14.760 --> 45:18.760]  If you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing
[45:18.760 --> 45:22.760]  If you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself
[45:22.760 --> 45:27.760]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too
[45:27.760 --> 45:33.760]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[45:33.760 --> 45:38.760]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.760 --> 45:42.760]  About the principles and practices that control our American courts
[45:42.760 --> 45:51.760]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more
[45:51.760 --> 46:13.760]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[46:13.760 --> 46:25.760]  If you did not have any problem where are you going to look for one? If you could not wage any battle would your purpose has to be done?
[46:25.760 --> 46:31.760]  Such a sad demand a soldier a warrior of love scuffle and they keep the peace
[46:31.760 --> 46:36.760]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding and somebody calls the police
[46:36.760 --> 46:50.760]  Watching the sparks fly
[46:50.760 --> 46:54.760]  Okay we are back Randy Kelton and Brett Fountain with Rule of Law Radio
[46:54.760 --> 46:57.760]  We're talking to Brett in Alabama
[46:57.760 --> 47:04.760]  So Brett what is it that you want to do at this point?
[47:04.760 --> 47:16.760]  Well one of my main questions was to clarify they cannot use the speeding defense as probable cause when it never got mentioned at all at the stop can they?
[47:16.760 --> 47:27.760]  Well what does Alabama law say about who can enforce the speeding statutes and against whom?
[47:27.760 --> 47:40.760]  Let me explain why I asked that question Brett can you tell him what the speed limit signs are for in Texas according to the Texas transportation code?
[47:40.760 --> 47:49.760]  Yeah Texas transportation code 201.904 it makes it really clear that the speed signs are for commercial activity
[47:49.760 --> 48:09.760]  So if you're one of the we the people that owns the roads that's not you but if you're one of the businesses that we the people through our legislature has allowed and permitted and licensed to use the roads for transportation business then those speed signs are for you
[48:09.760 --> 48:21.760]  You might take a look at the Alabama code and see because it's all you know it's federal all the 50 states have adopted it into their own states and so you'll probably find something very similar
[48:21.760 --> 48:30.760]  If you can show that the stop was without jurisdiction everything that follows it goes in the trash
[48:30.760 --> 48:48.760]  The stop I wouldn't think it matters that he whether he mentions it or not but he has to have all of the facts that connect with all of the essential elements of whatever it is that he's saying he has probable cause for
[48:48.760 --> 48:55.760]  If he has probable cause for XYZ and he can find it in the code there's going to be some essential elements for that
[48:55.760 --> 49:01.760]  What are the facts that go to those elements? Do they exist? He didn't articulate a one of them
[49:01.760 --> 49:13.760]  Okay if you get charged with practicing medicine without a license what is the first thing they have to establish?
[49:13.760 --> 49:15.760]  That you're issuing medicine?
[49:15.760 --> 49:27.760]  That you were licensed in Texas in Texas you can't be charged with practicing medicine without a license unless you have applied for a medical license
[49:27.760 --> 49:31.760]  It's right there in the code
[49:31.760 --> 49:38.760]  Look at your code read the traffic code they may have opened the door for you to bring an argument that they don't want to get to the supreme
[49:38.760 --> 49:54.760]  Now if you got a traffic ticket you're not going to take this to the supreme but if they're trying to bounce off that traffic ticket and get to much more serious stuff then it's worth it to you to take this to the supreme
[49:54.760 --> 50:18.760]  So you say that the complaint is insufficient as it fails to state that the original stop was based on knowledge that you were acting in commerce and thereby fell within the gambit of the commercial transportation code
[50:18.760 --> 50:24.760]  Yeah regulated activity
[50:24.760 --> 50:44.760]  You know I'm a pilot if they give me some kind of citation over doing something wrong as a pilot the first thing they have to accuse me of doing is operate an airplane without a license or operating under that license
[50:44.760 --> 50:51.760]  If I'm flying an ultralight it don't count
[50:51.760 --> 51:01.760]  So they have to establish that you're acting under the privilege that the license grants
[51:01.760 --> 51:08.760]  You are not acting under a privilege you are acting under the right to locomotion
[51:08.760 --> 51:17.760]  Whether you win this or not you want to give them an argument they're not going to want to have to argue with the supreme
[51:17.760 --> 51:28.760]  Most guys with tickets they don't worry about it they're not going to take it that far it's not worth it but when they're trying to put you in jail for a couple of years that's a different argument different issue
[51:28.760 --> 51:51.760]  Yeah especially the light violation was like an $18 fine if I would have been guilty of that but when he stopped me he said specifically I stopped you for a light violation he said I said what light he said give me your driver's license everything then you go into further detail
[51:51.760 --> 51:59.760]  Is that on his cam yes and it's on my phone I recorded the whole thing on my phone also it's right on their plane today
[51:59.760 --> 52:15.760]  They know they're going to lose the light site light complaint and that's going to disrupt everything so if you actually and if he subsequently claims that he stopped you for speeding then charge him with aggravated perjury
[52:15.760 --> 52:27.760]  And okay you need to look at the code what does the Alabama criminal procedure code say
[52:27.760 --> 52:41.760]  About a magistrates duty when presented with a criminal affidavit
[52:41.760 --> 52:53.760]  That was got real quiet there wasn't supposed to get quiet you were supposed to say oh yes it says this
[52:53.760 --> 52:58.760]  Can you can you do a search for that Brett
[52:58.760 --> 53:13.760]  To see about the criminal procedure now yeah one more thing that yeah I've been happy to also you said just a moment ago that the complaint was insufficient because it failed to allege yada yada
[53:13.760 --> 53:17.760]  Well was there a complaint.
[53:17.760 --> 53:19.760]  Does one exist.
[53:19.760 --> 53:22.760]  Or is it just a citation.
[53:22.760 --> 53:25.760]  Yeah, just the police report and the citation.
[53:25.760 --> 53:32.760]  They skipped a very important step.
[53:32.760 --> 53:39.760]  All right. Well, if you want to tell him about that due process for any I go look up Alabama.
[53:39.760 --> 53:51.760]  I was I was looking up Alabama code. I did a search for warrants in Alabama and got a whole bunch of policemen that they had issued warrants against
[53:51.760 --> 54:04.760]  Anyway, what we're talking about here is you want to bring a question they either can't or don't want to answer here if they claim that the stop was based on speeding
[54:04.760 --> 54:21.760]  And you have a video showing 68 in a 65 and you have a recording of the officer saying he stopped you because your lights were too bright during the day
[54:21.760 --> 54:26.760]  That's a non starter for them
[54:26.760 --> 54:45.760]  So make sure you take you know take them do a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction claiming that the purpose for the stop being that your lights were too bright during the day
[54:45.760 --> 54:49.760]  Was insufficient
[54:49.760 --> 54:54.760]  And force that all the way to the supreme
[54:54.760 --> 55:01.760]  If they rule against you, then you ask for findings affecting conclusions at law and
[55:01.760 --> 55:07.760]  Whether you get it or not, then you petition for analogatory appeal
[55:07.760 --> 55:17.760]  Can you answer this they told me I believe it was my attorney told me that if I lose this jury trial and they incarcerate me over this again
[55:17.760 --> 55:25.760]  I have to stay there until it goes to the Supreme Court if I appeal it again that sounds right
[55:25.760 --> 55:29.760]  No
[55:29.760 --> 55:39.760]  No, it doesn't you have a right to appeal even if a jury unless there's something specific in Alabama ask him what law that is so you can study it
[55:39.760 --> 55:49.760]  Now you might not believe this but there is a very good chance that your lawyer would lie to you
[55:49.760 --> 55:51.760]  Oh my goodness
[55:51.760 --> 55:57.760]  I know I know I know how that sounds
[55:57.760 --> 56:00.760]  There's a good chance they'll do that
[56:00.760 --> 56:03.760]  And if he's lied to you
[56:03.760 --> 56:16.760]  Then one thing he's under contract for you and lawyers think they can just take money for a contract and walk away from it anytime they want to
[56:16.760 --> 56:22.760]  First thing you got to do is let him know you're bound to this contract and I'm not letting you out of it
[56:22.760 --> 56:27.760]  So catch him lying to them bar grieving
[56:27.760 --> 56:30.760]  Don't tell him you're going to bar grieving
[56:30.760 --> 56:38.760]  And don't say anything about the bar grievance and if he says anything about the bar grievance you bar grieving for that
[56:38.760 --> 56:44.760]  If you bar grieving is that the same thing as filing a complaint with the ethics commission
[56:44.760 --> 56:47.760]  That's exactly what it is
[56:47.760 --> 56:49.760]  Okay
[56:49.760 --> 56:54.760]  That's going to sting him big time with his insurance company
[56:54.760 --> 57:02.760]  The ethics commission don't care they won't do squat but that'll get him in trouble with his insurance company and that's what will make him unhappy
[57:02.760 --> 57:09.760]  And then if he says anything about it to you or to the court you bar grieving for that
[57:09.760 --> 57:14.760]  And then he's absolutely going to go to the court and petition to withdraw
[57:14.760 --> 57:18.760]  And he's required to give you notice
[57:18.760 --> 57:24.760]  And when he does I just had someone recently
[57:24.760 --> 57:29.760]  Well I had someone they might not and that's another issue that'll stop them
[57:29.760 --> 57:38.760]  But he was in Hayes County and the lawyer had filed a motion to withdraw and they had a hearing on it
[57:38.760 --> 57:44.760]  And they asked him the client do you agree to him withdrawing and he said heck no
[57:44.760 --> 57:51.760]  And they said well if you can't get along with your attorney how can he represent you
[57:51.760 --> 57:59.760]  I paid him to represent me it doesn't matter if he gets along with me or not he's under contract
[57:59.760 --> 58:07.760]  And the judge said counselor you're going to have to work this out with your client
[58:07.760 --> 58:10.760]  Now you got him
[58:10.760 --> 58:13.760]  Now he can't get away from you he's stuck to you
[58:13.760 --> 58:18.760]  Now he can go to the prosecutor with plausible deniability
[58:18.760 --> 58:22.760]  Now he can do his job
[58:22.760 --> 58:27.760]  And if he doesn't he knows you're going to sue him every way from Sunday
[58:27.760 --> 58:34.760]  And that's what these guys are worried about they know I'm going to sue them all if I can just dismiss
[58:34.760 --> 58:39.760]  It's always risky no matter what
[58:39.760 --> 58:49.760]  Everything's a risk hang on Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio we'll be right back
[58:49.760 --> 58:53.760]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[58:53.760 --> 58:57.760]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it
[58:57.760 --> 59:01.760]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[59:01.760 --> 59:06.760]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture
[59:06.760 --> 59:12.760]  Enter the recovery version first this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate
[59:12.760 --> 59:17.760]  But the real story is the more than nine thousand explanatory footnotes
[59:17.760 --> 59:21.760]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[59:21.760 --> 59:27.760]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[59:27.760 --> 59:32.760]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[59:32.760 --> 59:42.760]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:42.760 --> 59:46.760]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[59:46.760 --> 59:49.760]  That's freestudybible.com
[59:49.760 --> 59:59.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com
[59:59.760 --> 01:00:04.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[01:00:04.760 --> 01:00:08.760]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[01:00:08.760 --> 01:00:10.760]  Our liberty depends on it
[01:00:10.760 --> 01:00:16.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[01:00:16.760 --> 01:00:18.760]  Privacy is under attack
[01:00:18.760 --> 01:00:21.760]  When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[01:00:21.760 --> 01:00:26.760]  And once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:00:26.760 --> 01:00:31.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:00:31.760 --> 01:00:34.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:00:34.760 --> 01:00:37.760]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[01:00:37.760 --> 01:00:41.760]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[01:00:41.760 --> 01:00:44.760]  Start over with Startpage
[01:00:44.760 --> 01:00:48.760]  Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six
[01:00:48.760 --> 01:00:53.760]  Think of how the number six is implicated in evil as in the biblical 666
[01:00:53.760 --> 01:00:57.760]  So it would fit right in that the seventh amendment would be about civil trials
[01:00:57.760 --> 01:01:00.760]  Civil seven, civil trials, get it?
[01:01:00.760 --> 01:01:04.760]  Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute
[01:01:04.760 --> 01:01:06.760]  Like the dividing line between properties
[01:01:06.760 --> 01:01:11.760]  They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs
[01:01:11.760 --> 01:01:16.760]  The seventh amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters
[01:01:16.760 --> 01:01:19.760]  Instead of having a lone judge rule on the case
[01:01:19.760 --> 01:01:24.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:01:31.760 --> 01:01:35.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution
[01:01:35.760 --> 01:01:39.760]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect
[01:01:39.760 --> 01:01:41.760]  Our liberty depends on it
[01:01:41.760 --> 01:01:47.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights
[01:01:47.760 --> 01:01:49.760]  Privacy is under attack
[01:01:49.760 --> 01:01:52.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[01:01:52.760 --> 01:01:57.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:01:57.760 --> 01:02:02.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[01:02:02.760 --> 01:02:05.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:02:05.760 --> 01:02:08.760]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com
[01:02:08.760 --> 01:02:12.760]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[01:02:12.760 --> 01:02:15.760]  Start over with StartPage
[01:02:15.760 --> 01:02:21.760]  Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel, 1984, when Winston is threatened with his worst fear?
[01:02:21.760 --> 01:02:25.760]  That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face
[01:02:25.760 --> 01:02:29.760]  But what if his worst fear was spiders? Eight-legged spiders, to be exact
[01:02:29.760 --> 01:02:32.760]  Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual
[01:02:32.760 --> 01:02:36.760]  That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment
[01:02:36.760 --> 01:02:43.760]  Our founding fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from creepy-crawly eight-legged punishments
[01:02:43.760 --> 01:02:47.760]  and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in their day
[01:02:47.760 --> 01:02:53.760]  The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging excessive fines
[01:02:53.760 --> 01:03:21.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:03:23.760 --> 01:03:44.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:03:44.760 --> 01:04:04.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:04:04.760 --> 01:04:18.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:04:18.760 --> 01:04:23.760]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Weave Law Radio
[01:04:23.760 --> 01:04:26.760]  And we're talking to Bret in Alabama
[01:04:26.760 --> 01:04:28.760]  This is difficult, Bret
[01:04:28.760 --> 01:04:33.760]  It always makes me uncomfortable when I'm talking about somebody's liberty
[01:04:33.760 --> 01:04:43.760]  And I hate to wax self-righteous when someone's liberty is at risk
[01:04:43.760 --> 01:04:50.760]  So what I'm speaking to here is how best do we protect your liberty?
[01:04:50.760 --> 01:04:54.760]  You don't want to go to jail
[01:04:54.760 --> 01:05:03.760]  All these legal reformers, they're prepared to go to jail for their cause
[01:05:03.760 --> 01:05:08.760]  It's kind of like what Patton said about getting killed for your country
[01:05:08.760 --> 01:05:12.760]  Nobody ever won a war getting killed for their country
[01:05:12.760 --> 01:05:17.760]  So you win a war getting some other dumb SOB to die for his country
[01:05:17.760 --> 01:05:21.760]  So you don't want to do any good going to jail
[01:05:21.760 --> 01:05:24.760]  So how do we keep it out of jail?
[01:05:24.760 --> 01:05:27.760]  Well, if you run their routine, they got a whole routine
[01:05:27.760 --> 01:05:31.760]  They'll just run you through it and you'll wind up in jail
[01:05:31.760 --> 01:05:40.760]  So let's see if we can find some issues to hold them off for a while
[01:05:40.760 --> 01:05:43.760]  They claim they stopped you under speeding
[01:05:43.760 --> 01:05:50.760]  Have you studied transportation code in Alabama?
[01:05:50.760 --> 01:05:55.760]  Oh, I guess we can hear you better if I unmute you
[01:05:55.760 --> 01:05:58.760]  Okay, try now
[01:05:58.760 --> 01:06:04.760]  Yes, I did a few years back, but I really can't recall what all that is
[01:06:04.760 --> 01:06:07.760]  We'll go back to it, see if you can
[01:06:07.760 --> 01:06:11.760]  Oh, send me an email
[01:06:11.760 --> 01:06:18.760]  We have a fellow broadcaster who does the Agenda 21 show
[01:06:18.760 --> 01:06:22.760]  And I will send it to him, he's in Alabama
[01:06:22.760 --> 01:06:24.760]  Oh, great
[01:06:24.760 --> 01:06:26.760]  And he'll be able to help you with that
[01:06:26.760 --> 01:06:31.760]  He's got a whole group that he works with in this area
[01:06:31.760 --> 01:06:36.760]  My attorney, when I went in to meet with him several months ago
[01:06:36.760 --> 01:06:40.760]  Had his light expert come in, that used to be a police officer
[01:06:40.760 --> 01:06:43.760]  And now he trains police officers for DUI stops
[01:06:43.760 --> 01:06:45.760]  But he's my attorney's light expert
[01:06:45.760 --> 01:06:49.760]  My attorney had me take the lights off my truck I was stopped for
[01:06:49.760 --> 01:06:52.760]  And I wrapped them around my hand because they're on like a piece of tape
[01:06:52.760 --> 01:06:54.760]  They don't even reflect the beam of light
[01:06:54.760 --> 01:06:57.760]  They're not a light bar like the officer puts a three-four
[01:06:57.760 --> 01:07:02.760]  But we were in the room, and his light expert went over all the statutes on these lights
[01:07:02.760 --> 01:07:04.760]  The DUI driving lamps and everything
[01:07:04.760 --> 01:07:08.760]  And he said, I cannot find nothing in here that your lights would fall under
[01:07:08.760 --> 01:07:12.760]  And they literally shut the lights off in a room we were in complete darkness
[01:07:12.760 --> 01:07:15.760]  And putting those lights on in a wall eight feet away
[01:07:15.760 --> 01:07:17.760]  It wouldn't even reflect off the wall
[01:07:17.760 --> 01:07:21.760]  I mean, they don't even project the beam of light at all
[01:07:21.760 --> 01:07:25.760]  So that's how that went
[01:07:25.760 --> 01:07:29.760]  Wait a minute, what is the law?
[01:07:29.760 --> 01:07:33.760]  Could you hear that, Brett? I was getting distortion
[01:07:33.760 --> 01:07:36.760]  Yeah, he was describing how the lawyer told him
[01:07:36.760 --> 01:07:39.760]  Get those lights off of your truck and bring them into the courtroom
[01:07:39.760 --> 01:07:42.760]  Apparently it's something that was battery powered or something
[01:07:42.760 --> 01:07:46.760]  He had some way he could bring it into the courtroom and just show it to everybody
[01:07:46.760 --> 01:07:49.760]  And they turned off the lights in the courtroom
[01:07:49.760 --> 01:07:54.760]  And he illuminated these lights in question
[01:07:54.760 --> 01:07:59.760]  And it wouldn't even show up on the wall eight feet away
[01:07:59.760 --> 01:08:01.760]  It's so dim
[01:08:01.760 --> 01:08:04.760]  Yeah, and they don't project the beam of light
[01:08:04.760 --> 01:08:08.760]  There's no cup behind them to project them like a flashlight or something
[01:08:08.760 --> 01:08:12.760]  This is just kind of a little bit of a glow
[01:08:12.760 --> 01:08:15.760]  Yes, yep, just for observation
[01:08:15.760 --> 01:08:20.760]  According to their statute, they said that if I fell under, they could be 300 lumens
[01:08:20.760 --> 01:08:25.760]  Or 300 candle power, which is like 3,777 lumens
[01:08:25.760 --> 01:08:31.760]  And these things are like probably 200 lumens at the most
[01:08:31.760 --> 01:08:39.760]  So when you've got a regular light bulb is what, about 60 lumens?
[01:08:39.760 --> 01:08:42.760]  I'm not for sure on that, Randy
[01:08:42.760 --> 01:08:45.760]  Yeah, I think you're on the order of that
[01:08:45.760 --> 01:08:49.760]  So this would be like what they say it has to be 3,000
[01:08:49.760 --> 01:08:56.760]  That would be like a landing light on a jumbo jet
[01:08:56.760 --> 01:09:02.760]  No, I had a friend, I was in the military in Fort Lauderdale
[01:09:02.760 --> 01:09:05.760]  South of Miami, Homestead, Florida
[01:09:05.760 --> 01:09:11.760]  A friend of mine had a landing light on the front of his 57 Chevy
[01:09:11.760 --> 01:09:14.760]  And we pulled up behind this highway patrolman in traffic
[01:09:14.760 --> 01:09:17.760]  It was real foggy and he had this light on
[01:09:17.760 --> 01:09:22.760]  And it looked like the fog was rising up between the two cars
[01:09:22.760 --> 01:09:29.760]  And I looked and it wasn't fog, it was the stickers on the back of the highway patrolman's car
[01:09:29.760 --> 01:09:35.760]  Were smoking and curling up and falling off
[01:09:35.760 --> 01:09:38.760]  I said, Ted, you better turn that light off
[01:09:38.760 --> 01:09:42.760]  The highway patrol guy gets out, walked around, looked at the light
[01:09:42.760 --> 01:09:46.760]  Took out his pistol and busted it out
[01:09:46.760 --> 01:09:50.760]  Put his pistol back and went and got in his car and drove off
[01:09:50.760 --> 01:09:54.760]  But that's the kind of light you're talking about
[01:09:54.760 --> 01:09:58.760]  They're not going to want these to get in front of a jury
[01:09:58.760 --> 01:10:02.760]  And what I was saying about the lights when he had me take them off my truck and show them
[01:10:02.760 --> 01:10:06.760]  He had me take them to his office, actually it wasn't the court
[01:10:06.760 --> 01:10:11.760]  I took them to my attorney's office and he brought his light expert in there to the office
[01:10:11.760 --> 01:10:13.760]  And that was where we was in that room
[01:10:13.760 --> 01:10:17.760]  And he looked up the code on them and couldn't find nothing my lights would fall under
[01:10:17.760 --> 01:10:24.760]  And that's where we shut the light off and they wouldn't even reflect off the wall like eight foot away
[01:10:24.760 --> 01:10:28.760]  So he couldn't find any law that it fell under?
[01:10:28.760 --> 01:10:30.760]  No, sir, he said there was nothing
[01:10:30.760 --> 01:10:32.760]  That's why they're trying to go to speeding
[01:10:32.760 --> 01:10:34.760]  So take on speeding
[01:10:34.760 --> 01:10:37.760]  But they can't just switch, they can't just say
[01:10:37.760 --> 01:10:40.760]  Oh, I changed my mind about what my probable cause was
[01:10:40.760 --> 01:10:43.760]  Because now I figured out that I was wrong at first
[01:10:43.760 --> 01:10:46.760]  And I actually didn't have a good reason
[01:10:46.760 --> 01:10:50.760]  But I just thought of one
[01:10:50.760 --> 01:10:54.760]  That's the way I see it too, Greg
[01:10:54.760 --> 01:10:58.760]  Okay, you need to address that before you get to court
[01:10:58.760 --> 01:11:03.760]  That's not something that goes to a point of law and won't go before a jury
[01:11:03.760 --> 01:11:06.760]  They'll hide that from the jury
[01:11:06.760 --> 01:11:11.760]  So Monday is the suppression hearing to try to get everything suppressed
[01:11:11.760 --> 01:11:16.760]  They're trying so hard to get me on this, I don't think they're going to suppress nothing
[01:11:16.760 --> 01:11:20.760]  Then it probably won't matter
[01:11:20.760 --> 01:11:25.760]  It sounds like they don't have anything
[01:11:25.760 --> 01:11:27.760]  They've got to get past the front doors
[01:11:27.760 --> 01:11:29.760]  Subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[01:11:29.760 --> 01:11:38.760]  You claim that there was no original probable cause
[01:11:38.760 --> 01:11:41.760]  If you can find no statute, the lights fall under
[01:11:41.760 --> 01:11:45.760]  There's no probable cause for the stop
[01:11:45.760 --> 01:11:50.760]  They can dance around about speeding after the fact
[01:11:50.760 --> 01:11:57.760]  But if you have him on recording saying the reason I stopped you is
[01:11:57.760 --> 01:11:59.760]  He is stuck with that
[01:11:59.760 --> 01:12:00.760]  Definitely
[01:12:00.760 --> 01:12:02.760]  Actually, when he walked up my truck when I first stopped
[01:12:02.760 --> 01:12:04.760]  I asked him what's your emergency
[01:12:04.760 --> 01:12:06.760]  Because he had his emergency lights going on
[01:12:06.760 --> 01:12:08.760]  And he said there is no emergency
[01:12:08.760 --> 01:12:13.760]  He said, however, I stopped you for a light violation
[01:12:13.760 --> 01:12:17.760]  That'll do it
[01:12:17.760 --> 01:12:20.760]  Then take that on
[01:12:20.760 --> 01:12:27.760]  That goes to subject matter jurisdiction
[01:12:27.760 --> 01:12:35.760]  He stopped you without any jurisdiction because what he accused you of was not a crime
[01:12:35.760 --> 01:12:39.760]  And everybody laughs when I show them the lights he stopped before
[01:12:39.760 --> 01:12:41.760]  They're like, he must be visually impaired
[01:12:41.760 --> 01:12:46.760]  Things aren't bright at all
[01:12:46.760 --> 01:12:49.760]  He was saying that it was too bright
[01:12:49.760 --> 01:12:53.760]  He put in the report there were extremely bright light bars
[01:12:53.760 --> 01:12:55.760]  Before he put it in the police report
[01:12:55.760 --> 01:12:59.760]  Okay, well try not to get to those details
[01:12:59.760 --> 01:13:01.760]  If you try to argue those details
[01:13:01.760 --> 01:13:07.760]  The court will use their discretion and rule against you every single time
[01:13:07.760 --> 01:13:14.760]  Take them to there is no such violation
[01:13:14.760 --> 01:13:17.760]  Okay, I see
[01:13:17.760 --> 01:13:21.760]  If you can show a certain number of lumens this thing produces
[01:13:21.760 --> 01:13:24.760]  Because it won't do any good for you to go in court and say
[01:13:24.760 --> 01:13:28.760]  I think it's about 200 lumens
[01:13:28.760 --> 01:13:35.760]  You're going to have to say, look
[01:13:35.760 --> 01:13:39.760]  The extraction says a certain number of lumens
[01:13:39.760 --> 01:13:47.760]  And this complaint here doesn't say that he found something of a certain number of lumens
[01:13:47.760 --> 01:13:50.760]  So his stop is invalid
[01:13:50.760 --> 01:13:51.760]  That's where we're going
[01:13:51.760 --> 01:13:56.760]  You said that the lawyer didn't find anything that applied to this?
[01:13:56.760 --> 01:13:58.760]  Correct, yes
[01:13:58.760 --> 01:14:04.760]  What does the light statute say or is there one?
[01:14:04.760 --> 01:14:07.760]  It says they can be 300 candle power
[01:14:07.760 --> 01:14:13.760]  Which equilibrates to 3,777 lumens
[01:14:13.760 --> 01:14:16.760]  Now my attorney had me buy a light bar
[01:14:16.760 --> 01:14:20.760]  It's the only one I could find close to 3,770 lumens
[01:14:20.760 --> 01:14:23.760]  It's like 3,778 lumens I believe
[01:14:23.760 --> 01:14:27.760]  So it's just like a couple lumens over what would be legal
[01:14:27.760 --> 01:14:32.760]  So he told me we could bring them to court and compare that with the lights I was actually stopped for
[01:14:32.760 --> 01:14:37.760]  And it should very well clear up that it definitely wasn't light bars he even stopped me for
[01:14:37.760 --> 01:14:42.760]  Let alone 3,000 lumens
[01:14:42.760 --> 01:14:45.760]  Okay, if there is a statute
[01:14:45.760 --> 01:14:53.760]  Then you need to get that addressed first and use that as a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction
[01:14:53.760 --> 01:14:56.760]  That if the light was not sufficient
[01:14:56.760 --> 01:15:02.760]  The problem is it goes to the discretion of the officer
[01:15:02.760 --> 01:15:06.760]  Oh, it appeared to be too bright to me
[01:15:06.760 --> 01:15:09.760]  You have to show that he's lying
[01:15:09.760 --> 01:15:12.760]  That there's no way it could appear to be too bright to him
[01:15:12.760 --> 01:15:16.760]  Yeah, and he was on the opposite side of the highway coming at me
[01:15:16.760 --> 01:15:21.760]  There was a medium between us even and in daytime
[01:15:21.760 --> 01:15:25.760]  And you're saying this was during the day
[01:15:25.760 --> 01:15:29.760]  Yes, sir, and he cut across the medium to turn around to get me
[01:15:29.760 --> 01:15:32.760]  He was on the opposite side of the highway
[01:15:32.760 --> 01:15:34.760]  Pulling out a direction with the medium between us
[01:15:34.760 --> 01:15:39.760]  There's grass 10, 12 foot or 15 foot between each, you know, each side
[01:15:39.760 --> 01:15:45.760]  So there's no way they're extremely bright to him clear over in that lane, especially
[01:15:45.760 --> 01:15:50.760]  Okay, well then you have to do that in the form of a subject matter jurisdiction challenge
[01:15:50.760 --> 01:15:54.760]  And claim that he lacks subject to probable cause
[01:15:54.760 --> 01:15:56.760]  As far as I know, okay
[01:15:56.760 --> 01:16:01.760]  Okay, this is a two hour show and we're running out of time quickly
[01:16:01.760 --> 01:16:04.760]  Okay, I appreciate you guys
[01:16:04.760 --> 01:16:07.760]  Okay, if you got more questions, call us back tomorrow night
[01:16:07.760 --> 01:16:11.760]  Okay. All right, Randy. I appreciate you guys. You have a good night now
[01:16:11.760 --> 01:16:13.760]  Okay, thank you
[01:16:13.760 --> 01:16:16.760]  Now we're going to go to Mark in Florida
[01:16:16.760 --> 01:16:18.760]  Now we're going to go to Tina
[01:16:18.760 --> 01:16:22.760]  Tina has to get off early, so she just tend to take a little mark
[01:16:22.760 --> 01:16:24.760]  Hang on, we'll get to you
[01:16:24.760 --> 01:16:27.760]  Hello, Tina
[01:16:27.760 --> 01:16:28.760]  We had to take you first
[01:16:28.760 --> 01:16:32.760]  We didn't want you to get churlish, but you've only got 30 seconds
[01:16:32.760 --> 01:16:34.760]  So you better hurry up
[01:16:34.760 --> 01:16:38.760]  Oh, darn it. Well, I'll give you an update on my day
[01:16:38.760 --> 01:16:43.760]  So you'll have to hear me after the break
[01:16:43.760 --> 01:16:45.760]  Okay, hang on
[01:16:45.760 --> 01:16:49.760]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, World Law Radio
[01:16:49.760 --> 01:16:51.760]  I'm not going to give out the caller number
[01:16:51.760 --> 01:16:52.760]  We've got a full board of callers
[01:16:52.760 --> 01:16:55.760]  Hang on, we'll be right back
[01:16:55.760 --> 01:16:59.760]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God
[01:16:59.760 --> 01:17:01.760]  and a better understanding of His Word?
[01:17:01.760 --> 01:17:04.760]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays
[01:17:04.760 --> 01:17:07.760]  from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture talk
[01:17:07.760 --> 01:17:10.760]  where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures
[01:17:10.760 --> 01:17:12.760]  in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15
[01:17:12.760 --> 01:17:15.760]  Study to show thyself approved unto God
[01:17:15.760 --> 01:17:17.760]  a workman that needeth not to be ashamed
[01:17:17.760 --> 01:17:19.760]  rightly dividing the word of truth
[01:17:19.760 --> 01:17:22.760]  Starting in January, our first week of the week
[01:17:22.760 --> 01:17:25.760]  where we'll go verse by verse
[01:17:25.760 --> 01:17:27.760]  and discuss the true gospel message
[01:17:27.760 --> 01:17:30.760]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week
[01:17:30.760 --> 01:17:32.760]  with discussions on sound doctrine
[01:17:32.760 --> 01:17:34.760]  and Christian character development
[01:17:34.760 --> 01:17:36.760]  We wish to reflect God's light
[01:17:36.760 --> 01:17:39.760]  and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[01:17:39.760 --> 01:17:41.760]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith
[01:17:41.760 --> 01:17:43.760]  and to transform ourselves more
[01:17:43.760 --> 01:17:45.760]  into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[01:17:45.760 --> 01:17:47.760]  So tune in to scripture talk
[01:17:47.760 --> 01:17:49.760]  live on Logos Radio Network
[01:17:49.760 --> 01:17:53.760]  So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com
[01:17:53.760 --> 01:17:55.760]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[01:17:55.760 --> 01:17:59.760]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures
[01:17:59.760 --> 01:18:02.760]  Through advances in technology
[01:18:02.760 --> 01:18:04.760]  our lives have greatly improved
[01:18:04.760 --> 01:18:06.760]  except in the area of nutrition
[01:18:06.760 --> 01:18:09.760]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[01:18:09.760 --> 01:18:11.760]  and it's time we changed all that
[01:18:11.760 --> 01:18:14.760]  Our primary defense against aging and disease
[01:18:14.760 --> 01:18:17.760]  in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:18:17.760 --> 01:18:20.760]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated
[01:18:20.760 --> 01:18:22.760]  adulterated and mutilated
[01:18:22.760 --> 01:18:25.760]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[01:18:25.760 --> 01:18:27.760]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[01:18:27.760 --> 01:18:29.760]  to endorse all sorts of products
[01:18:29.760 --> 01:18:31.760]  most of which we reject
[01:18:31.760 --> 01:18:34.760]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much
[01:18:34.760 --> 01:18:36.760]  we became a marketing distributor
[01:18:36.760 --> 01:18:39.760]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others
[01:18:39.760 --> 01:18:42.760]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com
[01:18:42.760 --> 01:18:44.760]  your health will improve
[01:18:44.760 --> 01:18:47.760]  as you help support quality radio
[01:18:47.760 --> 01:18:49.760]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity
[01:18:49.760 --> 01:18:51.760]  you may want to join us
[01:18:51.760 --> 01:18:54.760]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health
[01:18:54.760 --> 01:18:56.760]  help your friends and family
[01:18:56.760 --> 01:18:58.760]  and increase your income
[01:18:58.760 --> 01:19:14.760]  Order now!
[01:19:29.760 --> 01:19:35.760]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:19:35.760 --> 01:19:40.760]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan
[01:19:40.760 --> 01:19:43.760]  You put the fear in my pockets
[01:19:43.760 --> 01:19:45.760]  took the money from my hand
[01:19:45.760 --> 01:19:51.760]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:19:51.760 --> 01:19:56.760]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:20:10.760 --> 01:20:15.760]  Ain't gonna drop me with that same old sucker punch
[01:20:15.760 --> 01:20:19.760]  I get it now but then I must have been out there
[01:20:19.760 --> 01:20:21.760]  Okay, we are back
[01:20:21.760 --> 01:20:23.760]  We're going to tell Brett Fountain
[01:20:23.760 --> 01:20:25.760]  the ruler of our radio
[01:20:25.760 --> 01:20:27.760]  and we're talking to this sweet
[01:20:27.760 --> 01:20:30.760]  mild-tempered Tina
[01:20:30.760 --> 01:20:33.760]  There you go, that's the truth, Andy
[01:20:33.760 --> 01:20:36.760]  except when I get in front of those judges
[01:20:36.760 --> 01:20:38.760]  Yeah, she's mild-tempered with people
[01:20:38.760 --> 01:20:43.760]  but she's kind of ferocious when it comes to these judges
[01:20:43.760 --> 01:20:45.760]  Anybody that's wanting to act like they're going to
[01:20:45.760 --> 01:20:47.760]  pull one over on her
[01:20:47.760 --> 01:20:49.760]  She's more like a badger
[01:20:49.760 --> 01:20:51.760]  Yes
[01:20:51.760 --> 01:20:53.760]  A honey badger
[01:20:53.760 --> 01:20:55.760]  There we go
[01:20:55.760 --> 01:20:57.760]  A sweet honey badger
[01:20:57.760 --> 01:21:01.760]  Well, I've got some interesting update
[01:21:01.760 --> 01:21:05.760]  a little bit on my appellate thing
[01:21:05.760 --> 01:21:07.760]  where I've disqualified the judge
[01:21:07.760 --> 01:21:10.760]  but he refuses to be disqualified
[01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:13.760]  and he signed his own order
[01:21:13.760 --> 01:21:15.760]  denying my disqualification
[01:21:15.760 --> 01:21:21.760]  twice he's ruled on a motion
[01:21:21.760 --> 01:21:25.760]  without any legal explanation as to why he's denied it
[01:21:25.760 --> 01:21:28.760]  not a one word, just denied
[01:21:28.760 --> 01:21:32.760]  and then I managed to file my appellate brief
[01:21:32.760 --> 01:21:37.760]  about ten minutes before the midnight on the 24th
[01:21:37.760 --> 01:21:38.760]  which is when it's due
[01:21:38.760 --> 01:21:40.760]  Now I knew it wasn't perfect
[01:21:40.760 --> 01:21:43.760]  but as Randy says, just get something in
[01:21:43.760 --> 01:21:45.760]  and then you're going to amend later
[01:21:45.760 --> 01:21:50.760]  Yeah, done is better than perfect
[01:21:50.760 --> 01:21:52.760]  Done is better than perfect
[01:21:52.760 --> 01:21:55.760]  I've worked hours and hours on this
[01:21:55.760 --> 01:21:58.760]  and I've been getting a little help from Ms. Mason
[01:21:58.760 --> 01:22:01.760]  and she's been wonderful
[01:22:01.760 --> 01:22:03.760]  So we get it in and then they reject
[01:22:03.760 --> 01:22:06.760]  I get the confirmation from True Filing
[01:22:06.760 --> 01:22:10.760]  that it was filed with the timestamp
[01:22:10.760 --> 01:22:13.760]  The next morning I get it rejected
[01:22:13.760 --> 01:22:16.760]  for lack of a certificate of word count
[01:22:16.760 --> 01:22:19.760]  So they said, well, it's late now
[01:22:19.760 --> 01:22:21.760]  and I said, well, I can correct that
[01:22:21.760 --> 01:22:22.760]  Well, it's late
[01:22:22.760 --> 01:22:24.760]  No, I filed it on time
[01:22:24.760 --> 01:22:27.760]  It's missing something, you're rejecting it
[01:22:27.760 --> 01:22:30.760]  So we went out and got with the clerk
[01:22:30.760 --> 01:22:35.760]  Yeah, the clerk is required to give you an additional
[01:22:35.760 --> 01:22:37.760]  reasonable amount of time to correct
[01:22:37.760 --> 01:22:40.760]  whatever defects she says there are
[01:22:40.760 --> 01:22:44.760]  And with something like a word certificate
[01:22:44.760 --> 01:22:47.760]  a word count certificate, you don't have to amend
[01:22:47.760 --> 01:22:50.760]  You can supplement, just throw another page at her
[01:22:50.760 --> 01:22:52.760]  and say, here's your certificate
[01:22:52.760 --> 01:22:55.760]  of how many words are in that document
[01:22:55.760 --> 01:22:58.760]  Well, it was funny because the word document in my brief
[01:22:58.760 --> 01:23:02.760]  was over the limit, the limit is 14,000 words
[01:23:02.760 --> 01:23:05.760]  So anyway, we decided, okay, we're going to take the time
[01:23:05.760 --> 01:23:07.760]  and we're going to really hammer them
[01:23:07.760 --> 01:23:12.760]  And so my final brief was 22,000 words
[01:23:12.760 --> 01:23:15.760]  And I kept filing and they got a little nice of the clerks
[01:23:15.760 --> 01:23:18.760]  as I kept filing and they kept rejecting
[01:23:18.760 --> 01:23:21.760]  And then the last time she said, well, you're nearly there
[01:23:21.760 --> 01:23:25.760]  You just need to separate, you have to file, leave
[01:23:25.760 --> 01:23:30.760]  leave to file a late brief and an oversized brief
[01:23:30.760 --> 01:23:33.760]  but you could combine them together
[01:23:33.760 --> 01:23:37.760]  but then you need to file a motion to augment the record
[01:23:37.760 --> 01:23:41.760]  with extra exhibits because they only allow you 10
[01:23:41.760 --> 01:23:43.760]  So I said, well, I'm not late
[01:23:43.760 --> 01:23:45.760]  And she said, well, you're considered late
[01:23:45.760 --> 01:23:49.760]  So what I put in my motion, you know, the leave
[01:23:49.760 --> 01:23:52.760]  to file an oversized and late brief
[01:23:52.760 --> 01:23:58.760]  is I put the link to the California Self-Help Appellant Court
[01:23:58.760 --> 01:24:01.760]  Knowledge Center, and it says reply brief
[01:24:01.760 --> 01:24:05.760]  If the Court of Appeal returns a reply brief for corrections
[01:24:05.760 --> 01:24:08.760]  the court will give the appellant additional time
[01:24:08.760 --> 01:24:12.760]  to correct the brief and to serve it and file it again
[01:24:12.760 --> 01:24:16.760]  So I put that in there and highlighted it
[01:24:16.760 --> 01:24:20.760]  so that you could see
[01:24:20.760 --> 01:24:23.760]  And they never gave me a specific time
[01:24:23.760 --> 01:24:25.760]  but it appears to be from what we found
[01:24:25.760 --> 01:24:28.760]  You have 15 days, like if you don't file it
[01:24:28.760 --> 01:24:31.760]  you have 15 days they give you
[01:24:31.760 --> 01:24:34.760]  So I put that in
[01:24:34.760 --> 01:24:38.760]  So that was on the 1st and the judge ruled
[01:24:38.760 --> 01:24:43.760]  The last time it took him 45 days to rule on the motion
[01:24:43.760 --> 01:24:47.760]  on my disqualification, not disqualification
[01:24:47.760 --> 01:24:53.760]  my demand for the other side to file complete disclosure statement
[01:24:53.760 --> 01:24:56.760]  It took him 45 days and he denied it
[01:24:56.760 --> 01:24:58.760]  without any explanation
[01:24:58.760 --> 01:25:02.760]  Then his disqualification, he denied the next day
[01:25:02.760 --> 01:25:10.760]  Then this one, he denied my motion to augment the case file
[01:25:10.760 --> 01:25:15.760]  with the exhibits that give proof of their actual fraud
[01:25:15.760 --> 01:25:22.760]  But he did accept my 22,000 word reply brief
[01:25:22.760 --> 01:25:25.760]  And so I put everything in there
[01:25:25.760 --> 01:25:30.760]  and included that the exhibits to augment the file
[01:25:30.760 --> 01:25:33.760]  were incorporated herein, here
[01:25:33.760 --> 01:25:40.760]  So now I'm thinking I need to file a request
[01:25:40.760 --> 01:25:43.760]  for findings of facts and conclusions of law
[01:25:43.760 --> 01:25:47.760]  as to why he denied the other side
[01:25:47.760 --> 01:25:51.760]  forcing the other side to file complete disclosures
[01:25:51.760 --> 01:25:55.760]  and why he denied my motion to augment the record
[01:25:55.760 --> 01:25:58.760]  All it says is denied, it doesn't give a reason
[01:25:58.760 --> 01:26:03.760]  And this is the same judge that in an interview
[01:26:03.760 --> 01:26:11.760]  said it is a judge's obligation to give a complete and detailed
[01:26:11.760 --> 01:26:15.760]  legal wording that's not in legalese
[01:26:15.760 --> 01:26:18.760]  an explanation of why they came to their conclusion
[01:26:18.760 --> 01:26:21.760]  Yeah, that's his own words
[01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:22.760]  That's his own words
[01:26:22.760 --> 01:26:25.760]  So I'm putting that in the findings of facts
[01:26:25.760 --> 01:26:29.760]  but all I could find on that was it relates to superior court
[01:26:29.760 --> 01:26:31.760]  and the trial court
[01:26:31.760 --> 01:26:36.760]  Does findings of facts and conclusions of law apply to appellate court?
[01:26:39.760 --> 01:26:42.760]  I wouldn't think so
[01:26:42.760 --> 01:26:49.760]  because the appellate court does not do findings of fact
[01:26:49.760 --> 01:26:51.760]  Do they do conclusions of law?
[01:26:51.760 --> 01:26:56.760]  Because they've got to give you a reason as to why they're denying your motion
[01:26:56.760 --> 01:27:01.760]  Yeah, that would...
[01:27:01.760 --> 01:27:04.760]  It seems like they have to do conclusions of law
[01:27:04.760 --> 01:27:06.760]  How do they think?
[01:27:06.760 --> 01:27:09.760]  Yeah, you might ask for clarification
[01:27:09.760 --> 01:27:12.760]  to support your appeal
[01:27:12.760 --> 01:27:14.760]  Okay
[01:27:14.760 --> 01:27:16.760]  Okay
[01:27:16.760 --> 01:27:17.760]  I can do that
[01:27:17.760 --> 01:27:19.760]  I'll just put findings of...
[01:27:19.760 --> 01:27:21.760]  I'll just put conclusions of law
[01:27:21.760 --> 01:27:24.760]  I'll leave out the findings of facts part
[01:27:24.760 --> 01:27:25.760]  and an explanation
[01:27:25.760 --> 01:27:27.760]  I have put in there that
[01:27:27.760 --> 01:27:31.760]  according to this interview on law
[01:27:31.760 --> 01:27:33.760]  what is it? It's Law Commons
[01:27:33.760 --> 01:27:34.760]  It's right there
[01:27:34.760 --> 01:27:36.760]  Judge Gilbert is quoted as saying
[01:27:36.760 --> 01:27:40.760]  it is a judge's obligation to give this explanation
[01:27:40.760 --> 01:27:43.760]  and in this case, he did not do this
[01:27:43.760 --> 01:27:47.760]  He failed in his obligation to this appellate
[01:27:47.760 --> 01:27:51.760]  is what I've drafted up
[01:27:51.760 --> 01:27:55.760]  In the words of illustrious Judge Gilbert
[01:27:55.760 --> 01:27:59.760]  it is a judge's responsibility
[01:27:59.760 --> 01:28:02.760]  It's an obligation
[01:28:02.760 --> 01:28:06.760]  It's clear, it's a judge's obligation
[01:28:06.760 --> 01:28:10.760]  That's what he says, so I'm throwing his words back at them
[01:28:10.760 --> 01:28:14.760]  and then regarding the disqualification for appellate for him
[01:28:14.760 --> 01:28:17.760]  I want to read here for others that might be going through this
[01:28:17.760 --> 01:28:22.760]  Disqualification for appellate justices is a decision made by each justice alone
[01:28:22.760 --> 01:28:24.760]  on the grounds set by Canon
[01:28:24.760 --> 01:28:30.760]  and he quoted 3E4C when he denied it
[01:28:30.760 --> 01:28:35.760]  but it says that
[01:28:35.760 --> 01:28:41.760]  statutory grounds for trial court disqualification are not applicable to appellate court judges
[01:28:41.760 --> 01:28:46.760]  but Canon 3E4C requires disqualification
[01:28:46.760 --> 01:28:51.760]  when circumstances are such that a reasonable person
[01:28:51.760 --> 01:28:58.760]  aware of the facts would doubt the judge's ability to be impartial
[01:28:58.760 --> 01:29:03.760]  the application of the reasonable doubt standard uses an objective test
[01:29:03.760 --> 01:29:10.760]  the perspective is of the average person on the street
[01:29:10.760 --> 01:29:15.760]  and there's a case regarding that United Farm Workers v. Superior Court
[01:29:15.760 --> 01:29:19.760]  and it says they don't need proof of actual bias
[01:29:19.760 --> 01:29:25.760]  the objective test ensures that proceedings appear to the public to be impartial
[01:29:25.760 --> 01:29:28.760]  and hence worthy of public confidence
[01:29:28.760 --> 01:29:32.760]  the reasonable person is not someone who is hypersensitive
[01:29:32.760 --> 01:29:34.760]  or individually suspicious
[01:29:34.760 --> 01:29:38.760]  but rather is a well-informed thoughtful observer
[01:29:38.760 --> 01:29:41.760]  and there's a case law about that too
[01:29:41.760 --> 01:29:47.760]  so I will finish this after the break because I'm not going to let Randy run me off the table
[01:29:47.760 --> 01:29:56.760]  okay, hang on, Ray DeKelter, Brett Felton, and we'll be right back
[01:30:17.760 --> 01:30:21.760]  when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:26.760]  and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[01:30:26.760 --> 01:30:31.760]  so protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself
[01:30:31.760 --> 01:30:34.760]  privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[01:30:34.760 --> 01:30:37.760]  this message is brought to you by StartPage.com
[01:30:37.760 --> 01:30:41.760]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing
[01:30:41.760 --> 01:30:44.760]  start over with StartPage
[01:30:44.760 --> 01:30:48.760]  are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.760 --> 01:30:51.760]  if so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart
[01:30:51.760 --> 01:30:55.760]  but think again, all that stress might be eating your brain
[01:30:55.760 --> 01:30:59.760]  a new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons
[01:30:59.760 --> 01:31:03.760]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems
[01:31:03.760 --> 01:31:09.760]  researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex
[01:31:09.760 --> 01:31:14.760]  that's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions
[01:31:14.760 --> 01:31:20.760]  so take a deep breath and chill out, it'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack
[01:31:20.760 --> 01:31:25.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine
[01:31:30.760 --> 01:31:35.760]  this is building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:31:35.760 --> 01:31:42.760]  the government says that fire brought it down, however, 1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:31:42.760 --> 01:31:45.760]  over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:48.760]  and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[01:31:48.760 --> 01:31:50.760]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer
[01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:53.760]  I'm a New York City correction officer, I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:31:53.760 --> 01:31:57.760]  I'm a father who lost his son, we're Americans, and we deserve the truth
[01:31:57.760 --> 01:32:00.760]  go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:32:00.760 --> 01:32:04.760]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[01:32:04.760 --> 01:32:07.760]  in today's America we live in an us-against-them society
[01:32:07.760 --> 01:32:09.760]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[01:32:09.760 --> 01:32:12.760]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[01:32:12.760 --> 01:32:15.760]  among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[01:32:15.760 --> 01:32:17.760]  the right to act in our own private capacity
[01:32:17.760 --> 01:32:19.760]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law
[01:32:19.760 --> 01:32:25.760]  traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[01:32:25.760 --> 01:32:31.760]  former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.760 --> 01:32:35.760]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law
[01:32:35.760 --> 01:32:40.760]  you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[01:32:40.760 --> 01:32:45.760]  by ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[01:32:45.760 --> 01:32:50.760]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[01:32:50.760 --> 01:32:55.760]  learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:55.760 --> 01:33:23.760]  copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[01:33:25.760 --> 01:33:47.760]  okay we are back Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[01:33:47.760 --> 01:33:52.760]  and we're talking to Tina in California
[01:33:52.760 --> 01:33:59.760]  okay Tina we do need to move along got two more callers it's been on kind of since the show started
[01:33:59.760 --> 01:34:08.760]  that's okay I just wanted to ask and I'll put it out in a bit if anybody is a person a well-informed thoughtful observer
[01:34:08.760 --> 01:34:17.760]  which I think most everyone on here is they might want to write an affidavit up about how they believe this judge
[01:34:17.760 --> 01:34:23.760]  is prejudiced against this appellant because they have been following the case and should be disqualified
[01:34:23.760 --> 01:34:31.760]  and I'll give some details to anyone who would like to help by doing that I've already given Brett some
[01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:43.760]  and I think that would be great if if they get people sending affidavits in based on what they heard on a radio show
[01:34:43.760 --> 01:34:52.760]  that's going to tend some up there you go so hopefully please everyone who's listening if you can help me out
[01:34:52.760 --> 01:34:58.760]  I'll put all the different things in there you just have to put it in your own words but I'll put all the cases and everything in
[01:34:58.760 --> 01:35:03.760]  because obviously I can't write it because everybody send the exact same thing and that wouldn't look good
[01:35:03.760 --> 01:35:09.760]  but if they put it in their own words they can cut and paste whatever I send and I'll give the case site
[01:35:09.760 --> 01:35:16.760]  and they can send it off to the court and to the judicial commission that would be in his bonnet
[01:35:16.760 --> 01:35:25.760]  okay thank you and I will go on the other line to listen thanks thank you Tina
[01:35:25.760 --> 01:35:31.760]  okay now we're going to Mark in Florida hello Mark what do you have for us today
[01:35:31.760 --> 01:35:42.760]  hi there so I'm still near the beginning of my suit against my former employer and my union
[01:35:42.760 --> 01:35:47.760]  that was removed federal court from New York State Court
[01:35:47.760 --> 01:35:52.760]  case is all happening in New York even though I live in Florida the action was all there
[01:35:52.760 --> 01:36:02.760]  so the opposing counsel are filing are planning on filing a 12d6 motion most two of them
[01:36:02.760 --> 01:36:06.760]  one for the union defendant and one for my employer's defendant
[01:36:06.760 --> 01:36:13.760]  that's being filed next week on the same day my motion to remand is due
[01:36:13.760 --> 01:36:21.760]  I get their motion to dismiss and then my plan is to file an amended complaint within 21 days
[01:36:21.760 --> 01:36:27.760]  in the meantime I'm filing a motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts
[01:36:27.760 --> 01:36:36.760]  because one of the opposing counsel specifically keeps trying to conflate two words
[01:36:36.760 --> 01:36:42.760]  that are very critical to the case I believe and they're different words with very different meanings
[01:36:42.760 --> 01:36:50.760]  one is negotiate and one is discuss and that's kind of like a little five line but it could be very important
[01:36:50.760 --> 01:36:58.760]  now I know when I filed my amended complaint though it makes all the other motions moot is that right
[01:36:58.760 --> 01:37:07.760]  yes everything everything that your original petition is off the table completely
[01:37:07.760 --> 01:37:21.760]  so everything you want an amended petition is kind of a improper term because you're not amending anything
[01:37:21.760 --> 01:37:29.760]  you're refiling anything that's not in the amended pleading is not before the court
[01:37:29.760 --> 01:37:39.760]  so everything that was in the original is gone but it's different than refiling recommend if I'm wrong
[01:37:39.760 --> 01:37:49.760]  in that my original filing date of my original complaint remains yes is that correct right okay
[01:37:49.760 --> 01:38:00.760]  that is that is correct so my big question is that and I know we've talked about it before but you guys were so full of great ideas
[01:38:00.760 --> 01:38:09.760]  and I wasn't ready to keep up yet I'm still a little foggy so I have on the one hand they're all tort claims
[01:38:09.760 --> 01:38:23.760]  I have four tort claims in state court however the claims against my union representative really really seem like
[01:38:23.760 --> 01:38:31.760]  no matter how I try to phrase it or no matter how I think about it or how much case research I do
[01:38:31.760 --> 01:38:42.760]  what I find is that union reps who acted in bad faith whatever state law that I claim gets subsumed by its federal counterpart
[01:38:42.760 --> 01:38:53.760]  okay wait a minute wait a minute where is the the primary office of the union it's in New York City
[01:38:53.760 --> 01:39:04.760]  then with the employer it doesn't matter where your rep is if you're suing the union it's federal
[01:39:04.760 --> 01:39:09.760]  no I was suing I'm sorry I was suing the union representative
[01:39:09.760 --> 01:39:16.760]  are you suing the union representative for acting as a union representative
[01:39:16.760 --> 01:39:30.760]  well I didn't phrase it that way but I did say that he I am suing him for a breach of oh what is it called a breach of
[01:39:30.760 --> 01:39:39.760]  sorry are you suing him for the breach of the duty he has under your contract with the union
[01:39:39.760 --> 01:39:52.760]  well this is what I'm running into no matter how I no matter how I think about it and and this gets reflected in all the case law that I've studied
[01:39:52.760 --> 01:40:07.760]  it seems like his his breach of duty can only be because he's a union representative now he if he wound up and slugged me in the face that would be one thing
[01:40:07.760 --> 01:40:20.760]  yeah okay so this is what exactly what I'm asking you did not sue him in his personal capacity you sued him in his capacity as a representative for the union
[01:40:20.760 --> 01:40:33.760]  I would like to sue him in his personal capacity but I cannot find any cause of action that okay that makes it since the union is in New York City you're in Florida
[01:40:33.760 --> 01:40:44.760]  that makes it diversity jurisdiction it isn't because all I moved Florida after this happened everything happened in Florida and on New York makes no difference
[01:40:44.760 --> 01:41:01.760]  the banks got this set up if you sue Wells Fargo Bank in any state other than Minnesota they have it is diversity jurisdiction
[01:41:01.760 --> 01:41:11.760]  now you could have gotten the loan in Texas the loan agents in Texas they got an office in Texas you never left Texas it's still diversity jurisdiction
[01:41:11.760 --> 01:41:21.760]  because where they maintain their primary office or headquarters that's where jurisdiction lies
[01:41:21.760 --> 01:41:32.760]  and that their main offices in New York so that's diversity jurisdiction
[01:41:32.760 --> 01:41:47.760]  even though I moved to Florida after all the events happened oh did all the did anything happen while you were in Florida
[01:41:47.760 --> 01:42:04.760]  the only thing that happened yes what happened while after I had moved to Florida is that I found out that my union had negotiated the policy that I was terminated for
[01:42:04.760 --> 01:42:17.760]  up until that time there had been I'm alleging I alleged my complaint that I didn't have any idea that they had negotiated the policy because they provided no notice
[01:42:17.760 --> 01:42:35.760]  okay that after your when you found out about it won't affect jurisdiction if if the union is in New York and all of the the actions complained of occurred in New York New York has jurisdiction
[01:42:35.760 --> 01:42:52.760]  right that's that's what I went on and that's how I filed my complaint so how did they move it to you said they removed it how did they remove it they were both the employers lawyers and the union reps lawyers
[01:42:52.760 --> 01:43:12.760]  removed based on the federal Labor Management Relations Act it's one of three acts of Congress that conferred jurisdiction over that's the plant state jurisdiction
[01:43:12.760 --> 01:43:31.760]  one of them is a resa employment I can't remember that's employee retirement something one of them is the Labor Management Relations Act and there's another one I can't remember so basically the federal government saying we need one body of law to govern labor
[01:43:31.760 --> 01:43:47.760]  so we don't have a bunch of different standards okay then that will probably put you in the Fed but is that a problem being in the Fed you don't want to ask you guys is it a problem okay hang on we're about to go to our sponsors
[01:43:47.760 --> 01:44:02.760]  ready Kelton bread fountain rule of our radio we'll be right back
[01:44:02.760 --> 01:44:19.760]  Calls letters or even lawsuits stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win to you'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights
[01:44:19.760 --> 01:44:35.760]  statutes what to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors out of your credit report how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away the Michael Maris proven method is the
[01:44:35.760 --> 01:44:51.760]  solution for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation is available as well for more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email Michael Maris at Yahoo.com that's ruleoflawradio.com or email
[01:44:51.760 --> 01:45:14.760]  Michael Maris at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit when your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand for CD course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step
[01:45:14.760 --> 01:45:32.760]  if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can to jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning
[01:45:32.760 --> 01:45:49.760]  experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases process
[01:45:49.760 --> 01:46:09.760]  tactics and much more please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:09.760 --> 01:46:28.760]  to understand how to stop debt collectors now are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit
[01:46:28.760 --> 01:46:42.760]  Chris dropped off.
[01:46:42.760 --> 01:46:48.760]  Sorry we didn't get to you today if you'll call back tomorrow we'll pull you up first.
[01:46:48.760 --> 01:47:08.760]  Chris came on right at the beginning like everybody else did and we just didn't get to everybody okay talking to mark in Florida and why is there a do you have a problem with being in the federal court it would seem easier since you're in Florida and there in New
[01:47:08.760 --> 01:47:21.760]  York.
[01:47:21.760 --> 01:47:44.760]  If I seek to remand I'll lose the claims against the union rep.
[01:47:44.760 --> 01:48:00.760]  And then I'll go back into the court with my tort claims against the men and women who were acting on behalf of my employer because these I didn't do my employer or the union I only do the individual in their individual capacity.
[01:48:00.760 --> 01:48:09.760]  And I'm just trying to gauge like so they were they have switched the case to their form of choice.
[01:48:09.760 --> 01:48:14.760]  And there I am with my state claim.
[01:48:14.760 --> 01:48:31.760]  You know it's kind of a it's kind of an opinion call since I've never done anything like this in my life other because it really matter that I would end up in federal court versus I don't think so I personally prefer the federal court to the state.
[01:48:31.760 --> 01:48:32.760]  Okay.
[01:48:32.760 --> 01:48:42.760]  The state is just less sophisticated and more likely to screw you around than the Fed.
[01:48:42.760 --> 01:48:52.760]  They both will screw you around but but the Fed is not so well I have found them to be somewhat more professional.
[01:48:52.760 --> 01:48:57.760]  I could work with a better.
[01:48:57.760 --> 01:49:06.760]  And if you have a state issue in a federal issue and the federal issue is exclusive to the Fed.
[01:49:06.760 --> 01:49:10.760]  Then the Fed can hear the state issues as well.
[01:49:10.760 --> 01:49:11.760]  Right.
[01:49:11.760 --> 01:49:14.760]  And in hearing state issues.
[01:49:14.760 --> 01:49:16.760]  In federal court.
[01:49:16.760 --> 01:49:31.760]  Do they seem to have the same level of acuity in judging those state claims even though oh yeah yeah what they do in the Fed is to judge himself doesn't really do anything.
[01:49:31.760 --> 01:49:35.760]  He has clerks he has law clerks.
[01:49:35.760 --> 01:49:42.760]  That do all this work for them and they tend to do a really good job.
[01:49:42.760 --> 01:49:46.760]  They do their homework.
[01:49:46.760 --> 01:49:55.760]  Because these law clerks are generally guys who got out of law school and got to be a clerk for a federal judge and that really looks good on their resume.
[01:49:55.760 --> 01:50:13.760]  So they're generally relatively young young lawyers still still fresh in the right way to do things and they're doing things for a federal judge who is not going to be happy if they screw something up for me.
[01:50:13.760 --> 01:50:18.760]  So I get really good briefs.
[01:50:18.760 --> 01:50:27.760]  That's why when I like to file a federal suit and then I'm going to get rule 12 motion to dismiss that's what I just got in this case.
[01:50:27.760 --> 01:50:31.760]  And the rule 12.
[01:50:31.760 --> 01:50:37.760]  They tell me all the things they think is wrong with my suit.
[01:50:37.760 --> 01:50:41.760]  Or if you if you file a pro se.
[01:50:41.760 --> 01:50:49.760]  They won't even file your suit until the clerks have been over it.
[01:50:49.760 --> 01:50:52.760]  If you file inability to pay.
[01:50:52.760 --> 01:51:01.760]  The court will closely examine your suit to determine whether or not you have a claim before they allow you to file it.
[01:51:01.760 --> 01:51:05.760]  So what they'll do is give you a judgment.
[01:51:05.760 --> 01:51:08.760]  They'll tell you everything's wrong with it.
[01:51:08.760 --> 01:51:14.760]  And then you get an opportunity to fix it before it actually begins.
[01:51:14.760 --> 01:51:20.760]  And I like this about the Fed because they the judge is going to tell both sides.
[01:51:20.760 --> 01:51:22.760]  Here's what's wrong with your suit.
[01:51:22.760 --> 01:51:25.760]  Here's what you need to do to fix it.
[01:51:25.760 --> 01:51:31.760]  So especially when you're pro se.
[01:51:31.760 --> 01:51:32.760]  They'll do real good.
[01:51:32.760 --> 01:51:34.760]  I filed a suit against the state.
[01:51:34.760 --> 01:51:38.760]  I filed against all the highest judges in Texas.
[01:51:38.760 --> 01:51:48.760]  And I figured since these are the highest judges in Texas that I'm going to get some good responses.
[01:51:48.760 --> 01:51:53.760]  I got crap.
[01:51:53.760 --> 01:51:56.760]  That was disappointing.
[01:51:56.760 --> 01:51:59.760]  It's easier for me to respond to them.
[01:51:59.760 --> 01:52:05.760]  I had 30 litigants and they were grouped together.
[01:52:05.760 --> 01:52:11.760]  So I had about 10 or 12 separate responses.
[01:52:11.760 --> 01:52:17.760]  I wound up taking one response and filing it in almost all the cases.
[01:52:17.760 --> 01:52:21.760]  The district attorney and assistant district attorney was different.
[01:52:21.760 --> 01:52:30.760]  And we had a city employees we sued and a private company, Nordstrom Rack.
[01:52:30.760 --> 01:52:31.760]  Those were different.
[01:52:31.760 --> 01:52:39.760]  But everybody else, all the judges, the court of criminal appeals, all of these directors of agencies, they all got one answer.
[01:52:39.760 --> 01:52:41.760]  They didn't give me anything.
[01:52:41.760 --> 01:52:44.760]  All of their stuff was trash.
[01:52:44.760 --> 01:52:49.760]  They're arguing state immunity and I sued them in the federal court.
[01:52:49.760 --> 01:52:51.760]  Duh.
[01:52:51.760 --> 01:52:53.760]  Come on, guys.
[01:52:53.760 --> 01:52:59.760]  Nobody gave me a good workout on the federal side of immunity.
[01:52:59.760 --> 01:53:03.760]  So this will help you.
[01:53:03.760 --> 01:53:05.760]  I think you'll like the federal court better.
[01:53:05.760 --> 01:53:11.760]  Clerks are required to be helpful to pro se litigants.
[01:53:11.760 --> 01:53:15.760]  And you will find them to be very professional.
[01:53:15.760 --> 01:53:23.760]  They're generally very polite, but pay close attention to what they tell you.
[01:53:23.760 --> 01:53:27.760]  And get on their email filing.
[01:53:27.760 --> 01:53:31.760]  You file something with the clerk and there's something wrong with it.
[01:53:31.760 --> 01:53:36.760]  Generally, before the end of the day, they'll email you and tell you what's wrong with it.
[01:53:36.760 --> 01:53:38.760]  So you can fix it and email one back.
[01:53:38.760 --> 01:53:40.760]  It goes much more quickly.
[01:53:40.760 --> 01:53:45.760]  And when you use email in the federal courts, they'll serve on the other litigants.
[01:53:45.760 --> 01:53:49.760]  You don't have to serve them with certified mail.
[01:53:49.760 --> 01:53:51.760]  The clerk will do that.
[01:53:51.760 --> 01:53:58.760]  Do you think I should use the email filing system instead of the direct e-file system?
[01:53:58.760 --> 01:54:00.760]  Because I've done both in this case.
[01:54:00.760 --> 01:54:05.760]  But I can file directly into the case by e-file, but then...
[01:54:05.760 --> 01:54:09.760]  Yeah, I would use the e-file.
[01:54:09.760 --> 01:54:11.760]  It just makes it a lot easier.
[01:54:11.760 --> 01:54:12.760]  You don't have to make...
[01:54:12.760 --> 01:54:14.760]  You know, I've got 30 litigants here.
[01:54:14.760 --> 01:54:20.760]  I've got to make sure every one of their attorneys got service.
[01:54:20.760 --> 01:54:25.760]  If I use e-file, and I'm trying to get my co-plaintiffs to do that,
[01:54:25.760 --> 01:54:27.760]  they're the ones in Austin doing all the filing.
[01:54:27.760 --> 01:54:30.760]  If I get e-file, then we just file it with the clerk.
[01:54:30.760 --> 01:54:34.760]  Don't worry about it because she'll serve it on all the others.
[01:54:34.760 --> 01:54:39.760]  And the other side doesn't get to complain that they didn't get properly served.
[01:54:39.760 --> 01:54:45.760]  They'll get your document and throw it in the trash and claim they didn't get it.
[01:54:45.760 --> 01:54:49.760]  Would a lawyer actually do something crappy like that?
[01:54:49.760 --> 01:54:55.760]  Oh yeah, in a heartbeat.
[01:54:55.760 --> 01:55:00.760]  It will avoid a lot of difficulty.
[01:55:00.760 --> 01:55:04.760]  At least that's my personal opinion from my experience.
[01:55:04.760 --> 01:55:06.760]  Yeah.
[01:55:06.760 --> 01:55:07.760]  All right.
[01:55:07.760 --> 01:55:08.760]  Well, thank you so much.
[01:55:08.760 --> 01:55:12.760]  I'm sure I'll be calling in again, unless they call with a big fat check,
[01:55:12.760 --> 01:55:15.760]  which I doubt this week anyway.
[01:55:15.760 --> 01:55:17.760]  Okay.
[01:55:17.760 --> 01:55:20.760]  Chris, if you're listening, we had three more minutes.
[01:55:20.760 --> 01:55:22.760]  Thank you, Mark.
[01:55:22.760 --> 01:55:23.760]  Thank you.
[01:55:23.760 --> 01:55:24.760]  Okay.
[01:55:24.760 --> 01:55:29.760]  Now, Chris dropped off, and now we're out of callers.
[01:55:29.760 --> 01:55:32.760]  So it's okay.
[01:55:32.760 --> 01:55:37.760]  Brett, quickly, what have you been up to the last week?
[01:55:37.760 --> 01:55:40.760]  Well, I did just get something in the mail yesterday.
[01:55:40.760 --> 01:55:48.760]  My federal appeal of that lawyer that was pretending to be the DA,
[01:55:48.760 --> 01:55:53.760]  and he did all that aggravated perjury and caused me all this trouble.
[01:55:53.760 --> 01:55:55.760]  Well, I've got him in federal court right now,
[01:55:55.760 --> 01:56:01.760]  and I did just get the appellee's brief that came in yesterday's mail.
[01:56:01.760 --> 01:56:04.760]  So I'm going to have...
[01:56:04.760 --> 01:56:09.760]  They put a whole bunch of work into laying out a whole lot of case law,
[01:56:09.760 --> 01:56:12.760]  but they also did a lot of misrepresentation in here.
[01:56:12.760 --> 01:56:17.760]  So it's going to take some effort to work on this,
[01:56:17.760 --> 01:56:22.760]  but that's what's coming up next.
[01:56:22.760 --> 01:56:25.760]  I would like to see that brief.
[01:56:25.760 --> 01:56:26.760]  Okay.
[01:56:26.760 --> 01:56:29.760]  Did you get my stuff on...
[01:56:29.760 --> 01:56:31.760]  What is it?
[01:56:31.760 --> 01:56:34.760]  Yeah, I saw the email notification come in just a little while ago.
[01:56:34.760 --> 01:56:40.760]  I haven't read through it yet, but that's exactly what I need to be responding,
[01:56:40.760 --> 01:56:47.760]  because they are claiming, they're hanging their hat all throughout on immunity,
[01:56:47.760 --> 01:56:53.760]  no matter what universal deity-like immunity.
[01:56:53.760 --> 01:56:55.760]  Okay, let me tell you what I did.
[01:56:55.760 --> 01:57:02.760]  They did that in all of these pleadings, and I ignored it.
[01:57:02.760 --> 01:57:11.760]  I sued them in the federal court, and I sued them for violating federal laws.
[01:57:11.760 --> 01:57:16.760]  All of that immunity was just simply irrelevant.
[01:57:16.760 --> 01:57:20.760]  I wrote all these answers for all of that stuff,
[01:57:20.760 --> 01:57:25.760]  and then once I did all my research, I said, that's all trash.
[01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:28.760]  That's just rabbit holes.
[01:57:28.760 --> 01:57:33.760]  Young doctrine was all that mattered.
[01:57:33.760 --> 01:57:41.760]  If you claim a violation of one constitutional right or one federal law,
[01:57:41.760 --> 01:57:49.760]  and I accused them of this conspiracy and applying it to me and others,
[01:57:49.760 --> 01:57:54.760]  and I accused them of applying these improper practices to people from out of state,
[01:57:54.760 --> 01:57:57.760]  and that affected interstate commerce.
[01:57:57.760 --> 01:58:00.760]  That got me.
[01:58:00.760 --> 01:58:06.760]  Ascroft did that over marijuana in California.
[01:58:06.760 --> 01:58:13.760]  So if it could possibly affect interstate commerce, well, they're screwing with truck drivers.
[01:58:13.760 --> 01:58:19.760]  So all the stuff about state meant absolutely nothing.
[01:58:19.760 --> 01:58:22.760]  I'm surprised they didn't even pay attention to that.
[01:58:22.760 --> 01:58:24.760]  They let it get sent out saying that.
[01:58:24.760 --> 01:58:26.760]  That's something that they really should have caught.
[01:58:26.760 --> 01:58:29.760]  They couldn't.
[01:58:29.760 --> 01:58:30.760]  That was in mind.
[01:58:30.760 --> 01:58:34.760]  Nobody touched it, because they couldn't.
[01:58:34.760 --> 01:58:36.760]  They knew we had them.
[01:58:36.760 --> 01:58:39.760]  Okay.
[01:58:39.760 --> 01:58:43.760]  I'm pretty excited about this one, and I'm disappointed in all these high-level judges.
[01:58:43.760 --> 01:58:44.760]  Okay.
[01:58:44.760 --> 01:58:46.760]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of Law Radio.
[01:58:46.760 --> 01:58:47.760]  We'll be back tomorrow.
[01:58:47.760 --> 01:58:49.760]  Thank you for listening.
[01:58:49.760 --> 01:58:54.760]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:54.760 --> 01:58:57.760]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.760 --> 01:59:00.760]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:00.760 --> 01:59:03.760]  that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:03.760 --> 01:59:07.760]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.760 --> 01:59:10.760]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.760 --> 01:59:19.760]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.760 --> 01:59:25.760]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.760 --> 01:59:29.760]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.760 --> 01:59:31.760]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:31.760 --> 01:59:34.760]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:34.760 --> 01:59:39.760]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:39.760 --> 01:59:48.760]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.760 --> 02:00:01.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.