ROL_2023-07-27_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.320]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.320 --> 00:09.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.360 --> 00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.760 --> 00:16.840]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.840 --> 00:18.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.440 --> 00:22.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.040 --> 00:26.800]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.800 --> 00:31.960]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.960 --> 00:32.960]  Privacy.
[00:32.960 --> 00:34.560]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.560 --> 00:38.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:38.840 --> 00:42.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.400 --> 00:44.840]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.840 --> 00:46.440]  Spar.
[00:46.440 --> 00:47.680]  It's what fighters do.
[00:47.680 --> 00:51.160]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.160 --> 00:54.360]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.360 --> 00:56.440]  S-P-A-R with an extra P.
[00:56.440 --> 01:02.840]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:02.840 --> 01:06.880]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.880 --> 01:08.400]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.400 --> 01:10.760]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.760 --> 01:14.480]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.480 --> 01:18.000]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.600]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.600 --> 01:22.600]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.600 --> 01:31.040]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.040 --> 01:34.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.680 --> 01:38.160]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.160 --> 01:39.640]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.640 --> 01:43.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.520 --> 01:46.660]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.660 --> 01:48.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.840 --> 01:56.640]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.640 --> 02:01.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.760 --> 02:04.400]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[02:04.400 --> 02:08.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.680 --> 02:12.220]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.220 --> 02:14.320]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.320 --> 02:20.160]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.160 --> 02:22.240]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.240 --> 02:26.720]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.720 --> 02:30.560]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.560 --> 02:31.560]  Get it?
[02:31.560 --> 02:33.880]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.880 --> 02:37.480]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.480 --> 02:38.480]  when he said,
[02:38.480 --> 02:43.640]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.640 --> 02:48.760]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically
[02:48.760 --> 02:50.520]  has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.520 --> 02:52.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.400 --> 03:21.320]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:22.880 --> 03:50.880]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[03:50.880 --> 04:12.200]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[04:12.200 --> 04:28.640]  now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now
[04:28.640 --> 04:45.080]  appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now
[04:45.080 --> 05:01.920]  appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears
[05:01.920 --> 05:31.820]  remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in
[05:31.820 --> 05:38.660]  losing that word. I want to say Affordable Care Act, but that's not it.
[05:38.660 --> 05:44.260]  Data, where am I at? Anyway, I went online-
[05:44.260 --> 05:49.740]  Was it something about memory? If you can't remember something, then you must be old enough
[05:49.740 --> 05:50.740]  to-
[05:50.740 --> 05:58.860]  I forgot. I was in Walmart the other day and standing by the vitamin section and this young
[05:58.860 --> 06:07.260]  kid came over and said, can I help you? And I said, yes, I came here to get something
[06:07.260 --> 06:17.540]  for my memory. He said, well, what was it? I don't remember. He stood there and looked
[06:17.540 --> 06:22.860]  at me a minute and then said, I walked right into that one, didn't I?
[06:22.860 --> 06:30.820]  Yes. As a matter of fact, you did. The Affordable Connectivity Act program. Affordable Connectivity
[06:30.820 --> 06:43.080]  program. Look that up. It cost me nothing to get my fiber internet hooked up, fiber
[06:43.080 --> 06:47.500]  optic, and it cost me nine bucks a month for internet.
[06:47.500 --> 06:50.060]  Wow. Nothing instead of $250.
[06:50.060 --> 06:51.060]  Yes.
[06:51.060 --> 07:01.180]  Nice. That was a big deal. Andy, you can also get it on your phone. I just didn't do that
[07:01.180 --> 07:07.740]  yet, but you get your phone a lot cheaper. But I had heard something earlier about that
[07:07.740 --> 07:13.500]  and they restricted the amount of use you could have on the phone. I don't know about
[07:13.500 --> 07:24.020]  that yet, but I'll check. I just didn't get to it. I was busy filing responses to motions
[07:24.020 --> 07:36.300]  to dismiss my lawsuit, the $500 million lawsuit. And from the nature of the responses that
[07:36.300 --> 07:42.940]  I got, Brett, we have got their attention.
[07:42.940 --> 07:43.940]  Very cool.
[07:43.940 --> 07:56.040]  Nobody addressed the issues that I brought. Nobody addressed the RICO challenge. They
[07:56.040 --> 08:04.020]  all said I didn't tell them enough information. Some of them said, it's 150 pages. This was
[08:04.020 --> 08:10.780]  supposed to be a brief statement. One of them started out with that, complaining that it
[08:10.780 --> 08:15.980]  wasn't a brief statement of the claim. And then in the very next paragraph, they complained
[08:15.980 --> 08:26.540]  that I didn't give them enough information. Some people are hard to please, but they didn't
[08:26.540 --> 08:35.260]  go into the issues I brought up. The only thing they wanted to talk about was the 15.09
[08:35.260 --> 08:36.260]  issue.
[08:36.260 --> 08:37.260]  Interesting.
[08:37.260 --> 08:41.560]  What did they want to say about that?
[08:41.560 --> 08:50.940]  That it did not provide a claim. I responded that no, it doesn't. And as a matter of fact,
[08:50.940 --> 09:00.620]  I did not make a claim under 15.09. Making a claim under 15.09, I did indicate to the
[09:00.620 --> 09:08.540]  court in the policing that I filed criminal charges based on 15.09. I filed criminal complaints
[09:08.540 --> 09:15.260]  against the governor and expected him to act in accordance with 15.09, which says that
[09:15.260 --> 09:22.540]  when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, complete in accordance with 15.05, the magistrate
[09:22.540 --> 09:32.780]  shall issue a warrant for a threat. So I said when Nathan Hatch, Chief Justice of the Supreme,
[09:32.780 --> 09:42.460]  refused to issue a warrant on the governor based on that 250 page criminal complaint,
[09:42.460 --> 09:47.460]  that he violated 15.05 and in the process failed to perform a duty he is required to
[09:47.460 --> 09:54.260]  perform. It denied me the full free access to enjoyment of right in violation of 39.03
[09:54.260 --> 10:00.820]  penal code and he acted to shield the governor from prosecution. So I filed that with the
[10:00.820 --> 10:08.020]  presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals. She didn't issue a warrant either.
[10:08.020 --> 10:11.820]  Do you think she read it?
[10:11.820 --> 10:20.180]  She probably didn't then, I suspect she has by now, because she answered and her answer
[10:20.180 --> 10:27.980]  only went to the 15.09 issue. Saying that I couldn't sue her for that and I'm saying
[10:27.980 --> 10:29.980]  yeah I can.
[10:29.980 --> 10:31.700]  Just did.
[10:31.700 --> 10:41.860]  Under 42 US Code 1983. Yeah, just has to be objectively unreasonable.
[10:41.860 --> 10:47.500]  Yeah, and she says that since she's a judge, she has absolute immunity.
[10:47.500 --> 10:51.220]  Oh yeah, reason can't get into there.
[10:51.220 --> 11:00.740]  I'm saying perhaps you do for judicial acts, but this is a statutory commandment. It did
[11:00.740 --> 11:11.260]  not allow you to exercise any judicial discretion and therefore you don't have immunity. But
[11:11.260 --> 11:20.460]  that's the only thing she argued, but that's great. She got it. Nobody said that I wasn't
[11:20.460 --> 11:29.060]  right about that they had the authority to make a determination of probable cause at
[11:29.060 --> 11:31.420]  that point. Nobody argued that.
[11:31.420 --> 11:35.980]  Well, they probably went looking for a way to argue that and couldn't find it.
[11:35.980 --> 11:45.260]  That's what I hope. So we'll see you the next time I'm in Austin and I go to the court
[11:45.260 --> 11:51.620]  of criminal appeals with a criminal complaint against somebody. Let's see what they do
[11:51.620 --> 11:58.900]  with it.
[11:58.900 --> 12:06.140]  What my plan is, is to hammer them hard enough that they're gonna say, we don't wanna wind
[12:06.140 --> 12:13.460]  up here again because each time this jack leg gets one of our answers, he'll write that
[12:13.460 --> 12:21.580]  next suit to get around our answers. And it's gonna get harder every time. So it would be
[12:21.580 --> 12:30.900]  much easier and what I actually sued her for was not even for that.
[12:30.900 --> 12:40.380]  I just raised that as a demonstration of how the ongoing criminal enterprise managed to
[12:40.380 --> 12:54.060]  maintain itself because magistrates in Texas refuse to take criminal complaints from citizens
[12:54.060 --> 13:00.540]  if those criminal complaints allege crimes by public officials. And by that act, they
[13:00.540 --> 13:07.020]  disenfranchised us from the constitution or in violation of the constitution, article
[13:07.020 --> 13:11.500]  11, section 19.
[13:11.500 --> 13:20.180]  That those criminal acts were part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. I argued that it was
[13:20.180 --> 13:28.860]  also an enterprise as defined by chapter 71, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Texas Petal
[13:28.860 --> 13:37.620]  Code, specifically 71.02 is a street gang. But I wasn't suing them in the state and they
[13:37.620 --> 13:42.980]  all argued that I couldn't sue them in the state. And I said, well, I didn't sue you
[13:42.980 --> 13:50.140]  in the state, I sued you in the Fed. And I sued you in the Fed not for a state violation,
[13:50.140 --> 13:52.060]  but for a federal violation.
[13:52.060 --> 13:53.060]  Right.
[13:53.060 --> 14:05.980]  It was kind of fun jousting with these guys. Oh, the best answer I got was from the head
[14:05.980 --> 14:08.860]  of the office of court administration.
[14:08.860 --> 14:14.100]  Oh, really? What did they have to say?
[14:14.100 --> 14:23.420]  Everything. It took me two days to answer that one. But she was being so smart and so
[14:23.420 --> 14:39.180]  thorough. She argued that she was acting under a court order. That the Supreme Court, primarily
[14:39.180 --> 14:48.660]  the Chief Justice of the Supreme, was required to oversee and direct the office of court
[14:48.660 --> 14:56.180]  administration. So she was protected by the same immunity that the Chief Justice was protected
[14:56.180 --> 14:57.180]  by.
[14:57.180 --> 15:01.660]  No, no. This is a statutory requirement for her.
[15:01.660 --> 15:13.540]  Well, that came to, I addressed that under the he told me to do it doctrine. But I indicated
[15:13.540 --> 15:25.380]  that this is an interesting argument. Is it the intent of Ms. Laveau in arguing this issue
[15:25.380 --> 15:37.580]  to throw the Chief Justice Hatch under the bus? And then heading on that paragraph, Laveau
[15:37.580 --> 15:49.020]  throws the Chief Justice Hatch under the bus. So when I filed my amended pleading, I need
[15:49.020 --> 15:57.620]  to name Hatch for the advice that he gave to the Court of Criminal Appeal, I mean the
[15:57.620 --> 16:07.860]  Office of Court Administration. So the question becomes, is that advice a judicial act?
[16:07.860 --> 16:12.100]  And does it confer judicial immunity on somebody that knows better?
[16:12.100 --> 16:21.620]  Yeah, and I accused the judge, and I addressed this in saying that not everything the judge
[16:21.620 --> 16:32.500]  does is judicial. When the judge hires personnel, when the judge issues directives on how to
[16:32.500 --> 16:42.540]  buy and pay for toilet paper, when the judge issues training for personnel, these aren't
[16:42.540 --> 16:49.020]  judicial functions. But they're probably going to use my arguments for toilet paper anyway.
[16:49.020 --> 16:52.260]  All that excrement going on in that office.
[16:52.260 --> 17:00.100]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[17:00.100 --> 17:04.700]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:04.700 --> 17:09.820]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won
[17:09.820 --> 17:15.420]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step
[17:15.420 --> 17:20.700]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[17:20.700 --> 17:25.420]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and
[17:25.420 --> 17:29.900]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial
[17:29.900 --> 17:33.660]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.660 --> 17:38.780]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[17:38.780 --> 17:44.220]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[17:44.220 --> 17:49.500]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's
[17:49.500 --> 17:58.980]  ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:58.980 --> 18:01.300]  now.
[18:01.300 --> 18:05.700]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[18:05.700 --> 18:11.820]  Word? Then tune in to logosradio.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[18:11.820 --> 18:18.220]  Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[18:18.220 --> 18:22.740]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[18:22.740 --> 18:27.860]  dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of
[18:27.860 --> 18:33.020]  Mark where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour
[18:33.020 --> 18:38.220]  topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character
[18:38.220 --> 18:43.100]  development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing
[18:43.100 --> 18:48.300]  ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.300 --> 18:54.940]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradio.com Wednesdays
[18:54.940 --> 19:01.940]  from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[19:24.940 --> 19:31.940]  We ask the Christian, wonder what they hide. They don't have the answer. Open their eyes.
[19:33.940 --> 19:42.940]  We ask the Christian, look what we get. And they don't have the answer. I'm sloping,
[19:42.940 --> 19:48.940]  slipping, sliding. I'm a talk both issues, but see Lord how the one we take, take it easy.
[19:48.940 --> 19:54.940]  Them attack way too politically and them getting mad and angry.
[19:54.940 --> 20:00.940]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelsey, Brett Fountain, Root of Law Radio. And on the break, I was
[20:00.940 --> 20:09.940]  talking to Brett about Garza, the district attorney in Travis County. Now, I have taken
[20:10.180 --> 20:17.180]  him criminal complaints and they got nowhere. And all over the state, we take complaints
[20:17.180 --> 20:26.180]  to prosecutors and they throw them in a trash. So I took complaints to the prosecutor against
[20:26.680 --> 20:32.180]  the governor. But the governor was a Republican, so they didn't get thrown in the trash. They
[20:32.180 --> 20:41.180]  went to the grand jury. And that gave me precedent. Then I gave him another set of complaints.
[20:41.180 --> 20:48.180]  Or actually Brett and Tina Colbrook gave him a set of complaints. And he threw those in
[20:48.180 --> 21:00.180]  the trash. So I filed criminal charges against him, accusing him of exerting or purporting
[21:00.180 --> 21:07.180]  to exert an authority he did not expressly have. And I think, how many were there? Five
[21:07.180 --> 21:09.180]  complaints, Brett?
[21:09.180 --> 21:10.180]  That sounds right.
[21:10.180 --> 21:16.180]  Yeah, I think there were two of them that I looked at it and I thought, that kind of
[21:16.180 --> 21:25.180]  looks like federal jurisdiction. And apparently he did too, the prosecutor did too. Because
[21:25.180 --> 21:31.180]  they decided that they didn't have jurisdiction, refused to prosecute.
[21:31.180 --> 21:41.180]  Message that effect check. Even if I agree that you are right, where did you get the
[21:41.180 --> 21:43.180]  authority to do that?
[21:43.180 --> 21:46.180]  Because he's not the one that gets to make that call.
[21:46.180 --> 21:51.180]  Yeah, I wanted to be a magisterial determination of probable cause.
[21:51.180 --> 21:57.180]  Yeah. So I took the complaints against the governor and gave them to the district attorney's
[21:57.180 --> 22:03.180]  head investigator. And she gave them to the, you know, I told her that I don't give these
[22:03.180 --> 22:08.180]  to you if you give them to grand jury. She went back and talked to her boss and come
[22:08.180 --> 22:12.180]  back and said, yes, he's agreed. If you give me these complaints, we'll give it to the
[22:12.180 --> 22:19.180]  grand jury. Okay, here you go. So I come back and give her another set of complaints and
[22:19.180 --> 22:28.180]  told her, tell your boss, whatever he does, do not open this one.
[22:28.180 --> 22:33.180]  I didn't tell him why, just told him not to open it, just give it to the grand jury.
[22:33.180 --> 22:41.180]  Well, he opened it. And he found criminal complaints against himself in there and didn't
[22:41.180 --> 22:45.180]  give those to the grand jury.
[22:45.180 --> 23:00.180]  And here's why. In his first statement and his motion to dismiss under Rule 12B6, he
[23:00.180 --> 23:07.180]  says, as this court is aware and as recognized by plaintiffs in their complaint, it is the
[23:07.180 --> 23:14.180]  moral and legal duty of the elected district attorney not to convict, but to seek justice.
[23:14.180 --> 23:26.180]  And in that part, that is true. But this other part wasn't agreed to by the plaintiffs. Thus,
[23:26.180 --> 23:32.180]  in deciding which charges to file and what punishment to seek, the district attorney
[23:32.180 --> 23:40.180]  must exercise prosecutorial discretion to balance the deeds of a victim, the rights
[23:40.180 --> 23:46.180]  of an accused, and the safety of the community. Is that a fact, Jack?
[23:46.180 --> 23:49.180]  That's a non sequitur. He's reaching.
[23:49.180 --> 23:59.180]  No, he's lying, or he's asserting an authority that he doesn't have. And that was my whole
[23:59.180 --> 24:08.180]  argument, that you don't have this authority. And I pounded him.
[24:08.180 --> 24:14.180]  It's amazing that he didn't go and find somewhere that he could argue that either he didn't
[24:14.180 --> 24:20.180]  assert that, you know, I didn't try to exercise that authority, or I do have a right to do
[24:20.180 --> 24:27.180]  that. It's my duty. Instead, that's a really lame support he offered.
[24:27.180 --> 24:30.180]  I would have expected some good case law.
[24:30.180 --> 24:35.180]  Yep. He obviously didn't have any, or he would have brought it. That's a big deal.
[24:35.180 --> 24:41.180]  He's got some sighted in here. And actually, on this one, I haven't looked up all the case
[24:41.180 --> 24:48.180]  law. You got Bandicap v Goldstein. I'll look that up and go through it, but I'm not gonna
[24:48.180 --> 24:56.180]  find it. Because there's nothing in law giving prosecutors this authority. This has been
[24:56.180 --> 25:06.180]  accepted and allowed. But I cited Kennedy v State, Bertha Kennedy or something like
[25:06.180 --> 25:13.180]  that v State. And it says in there, in order to avoid the obvious evils of the accumulation
[25:13.180 --> 25:22.180]  of power in any one office for the purpose of initiating a criminal prosecution, a prosecuting
[25:22.180 --> 25:26.180]  attorney is not a credible person.
[25:26.180 --> 25:32.180]  You can't start it and you can't end it. The only one who can end it is a magistrate or
[25:32.180 --> 25:40.180]  a trial judge. The only one who can initiate it is a magistrate. There is nothing in law
[25:40.180 --> 25:48.180]  authorizing a prosecuting attorney to initiate a prosecution, even if he receives a complaint.
[25:48.180 --> 25:55.180]  There's no way the complaints are directed to a prosecuting attorney. They're always
[25:55.180 --> 26:02.180]  directed to some magistrate. Even the prosecutor is directed if when he receives a complaint
[26:02.180 --> 26:10.180]  to give it to some magistrate. They're the only ones authorized to hold an examining
[26:10.180 --> 26:14.180]  trial or to make a determination probable cause.
[26:14.180 --> 26:23.180]  And the only place they're authorized to do that is in Chapter 16. Now we do have the
[26:23.180 --> 26:35.180]  State Bar Association telling lawyers, training them that judges can make a determination
[26:35.180 --> 26:40.180]  of probable cause under 15.17.
[26:40.180 --> 26:47.180]  What? Yeah. Seriously? That's what he says. That has nothing to do with that. They can
[26:47.180 --> 26:56.180]  set bond under 15.17. They can give warnings. But there's nothing in there about making
[26:56.180 --> 27:02.180]  a determination of probable cause and that's not all. He even says one of the warnings
[27:02.180 --> 27:06.180]  they have to give is that the person has a right to an examining trial. Exactly. They
[27:06.180 --> 27:18.180]  skip that. It gets worse. There is nothing in law anywhere that authorizes a hearing
[27:18.180 --> 27:33.180]  under 15.17. The only reference to 15.17 is in 14.06 and 15.16 where it authorizes a magistrate
[27:33.180 --> 27:44.180]  to issue the warnings in 15.17. That's it. Nowhere is anyone authorized to hold a hearing
[27:44.180 --> 27:46.180]  under 15.17.
[27:46.180 --> 27:48.180]  Where did you get that idea?
[27:48.180 --> 28:00.180]  Good question. They made it up. And that's the argument I brought. So it's important
[28:00.180 --> 28:09.180]  that I get past rule 12, the motion to dismiss. The first time around, I'm not gonna get past
[28:09.180 --> 28:20.180]  it. They judge a rule against me. They do that out of hand. So then I go back and recraft
[28:20.180 --> 28:29.180]  my pleadings. I wanna get this all the way to the Supreme. Make these guys argue their
[28:29.180 --> 28:34.180]  position all the way to the Supreme.
[28:34.180 --> 28:46.180]  They're not ever gonna wanna do this again. And that will get them to issue rulings that's
[28:46.180 --> 28:53.180]  in line with what the code said. And just from the responses I got, I actually believe
[28:53.180 --> 29:01.180]  that we may have already won. Our real purpose is not to make a lot of money. I mean, that
[29:01.180 --> 29:10.180]  would be nice. But our real purpose is to get things changed. And I think they're gonna
[29:10.180 --> 29:20.180]  change all by themselves with this law being in front of them and them having to argue
[29:20.180 --> 29:23.180]  it in fine detail.
[29:23.180 --> 29:31.180]  And in the next ones, I will put in more legal argument about the bad case law that's out
[29:31.180 --> 29:38.180]  there. I'll increase those arguments. And I think, well, this is already been fixed.
[29:38.180 --> 29:47.180]  Point is, guys, we can change things even in a corrupt system. We can make it less corrupt.
[29:47.180 --> 29:55.180]  In a state with 29 million people, sometimes nobody takes one of those 29 million to get
[29:55.180 --> 30:01.180]  something to happen. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[30:01.180 --> 30:06.180]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. But
[30:06.180 --> 30:11.180]  it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:11.180 --> 30:15.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details.
[30:15.180 --> 30:20.180]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:20.180 --> 30:25.180]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:25.180 --> 30:30.180]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.180 --> 30:35.180]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[30:35.180 --> 30:42.180]  Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with
[30:42.180 --> 30:44.180]  Startpage.
[30:44.180 --> 30:49.180]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:49.180 --> 30:54.180]  your personal information. But what happens if it escapes their control? It's not an
[30:54.180 --> 31:00.180]  idle question. According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their
[31:00.180 --> 31:05.180]  security was breached by hackers in the last year. That's one more reason you should trust
[31:05.180 --> 31:10.180]  your searches to Startpage.com. Unlike other search engines, Startpage doesn't store any
[31:10.180 --> 31:14.180]  data on you. They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing
[31:14.180 --> 31:19.180]  for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare. Too bad other companies don't treat
[31:19.180 --> 31:21.180]  your data the same way.
[31:21.180 --> 31:41.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:51.180 --> 31:56.180]  There is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go
[31:56.180 --> 32:01.180]  to buildingwatt.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.180 --> 32:06.180]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.180 --> 32:09.180]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a
[32:09.180 --> 32:13.180]  free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:13.180 --> 32:16.180]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[32:16.180 --> 32:20.180]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[32:20.180 --> 32:24.180]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:24.180 --> 32:28.180]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[32:28.180 --> 32:31.180]  Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:31.180 --> 32:35.180]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[32:35.180 --> 32:39.180]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[32:39.180 --> 32:43.180]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[32:43.180 --> 32:47.180]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.180 --> 32:51.180]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for
[32:51.180 --> 32:55.180]  your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today
[32:55.180 --> 32:59.180]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.180 --> 33:14.180]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.180 --> 33:31.180]  Mr. Officer, you're taking the law in the hand. Won't you follow the law of the land? I don't understand. Your job is to protect and to serve, not be abused.
[33:31.180 --> 33:45.180]  Mr. Officer, when you're going to stop abuse, your power. When you're going to stop abuse, your power.
[33:45.180 --> 33:47.180]  When you're going to stop abuse, your power.
[33:47.180 --> 33:51.180]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio. Brett's turned on the
[33:51.180 --> 33:58.180]  phone lines. If you have a question or comment, give us a call. But I hope you guys get how
[33:58.180 --> 34:07.180]  this is working. When I say the best fight to have is the one you picked, this is an
[34:07.180 --> 34:16.180]  example of why it's the best fight to have. I'm not the one under the gun this time.
[34:16.180 --> 34:24.180]  I'm not the one who has to get the court to rule in my favor. They are. They're the ones
[34:24.180 --> 34:33.180]  digging and scratching. It feels good. It does feel good to have the Chief Justice of the
[34:33.180 --> 34:43.180]  Texas Supreme digging and scratching, trying to find a way out from under me. I bet I don't
[34:43.180 --> 34:54.180]  get a Christmas card from her this year. The one document I haven't looked at is I've got one
[34:54.180 --> 35:03.180]  response from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. So it's likely to name all of the judges
[35:03.180 --> 35:09.180]  at the Court of Criminal Appeals. I think, but I haven't really looked at it close enough yet.
[35:09.180 --> 35:18.180]  I hadn't got to it. This one from Laveau took me two full days, like 16 hours a day,
[35:18.180 --> 35:26.180]  for two days to get that thing answered. You can only have 20 pages, and her complaint was
[35:26.180 --> 35:35.180]  right at 20 pages. So it was a beast. But tomorrow morning I start on the Texas Court of Criminal
[35:35.180 --> 35:45.180]  Appeals. If they have filed it from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, that raises an issue.
[35:45.180 --> 35:54.180]  Can the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals answer?
[35:54.180 --> 36:08.180]  Oh, what a conundrum they've probably never seen. Yeah, the Court of Criminal Appeals really
[36:08.180 --> 36:22.180]  doesn't exist. That's a name that they use to describe a government office. It's a legal
[36:22.180 --> 36:33.180]  fiction. And legal fictions can't be sued because they don't do anything. See, motion to dismiss
[36:33.180 --> 36:45.180]  for the judges of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Can they do that?
[36:45.180 --> 36:54.180]  That's an interesting question. It doesn't say who filed it. Now comes defendants. Oh, here it is.
[36:54.180 --> 37:18.180]  Okay. Judges Barbara Hervey, Kevin Urie, David Newell, Barry Luke Hill, Scott Walker. See how many are there?
[37:18.180 --> 37:42.180]  She responded, but not to my suit. She responded to my allegation about 1509. Guys, pay close
[37:42.180 --> 37:51.180]  attention to this. This is the highest level criminal judge in the state of Texas.
[37:51.180 --> 37:54.180]  They don't seem to do very well as a defendant.
[37:54.180 --> 38:05.180]  No, she didn't respond to my suit. My suit was about Rico. And she didn't respond to Rico.
[38:05.180 --> 38:20.180]  She only responded to 1509, and I didn't make any claims under 1509. I love it when a plan comes together.
[38:20.180 --> 38:24.180]  Oh my goodness. Wow.
[38:24.180 --> 38:37.180]  So I've got two that's sure to pass. That's Nordstrom, actually three defendants. Nordstrom and this Nordstrom employee,
[38:37.180 --> 38:48.180]  because they don't have any immunity. They just argued that I didn't fail to state a claim. And now I've got Sharon Keller.
[38:48.180 --> 39:00.180]  She just addressed my accusation against her under 1509. She didn't oppose the suit itself.
[39:00.180 --> 39:13.180]  So I get to move ahead on those two. I don't care about the rest of them. That'll be enough.
[39:13.180 --> 39:22.180]  This has made my day. I've been waiting to get to this one because I figured it was going to be good.
[39:22.180 --> 39:30.180]  And it almost certainly is. Let me go down here and see what they're arguing.
[39:30.180 --> 39:38.180]  All of them started out by saying the same thing, that what I was claiming was unclear.
[39:38.180 --> 39:44.180]  Indeed, plaintiffs do not allege any actions of any individual in the TCCA,
[39:44.180 --> 39:50.180]  but complain collectively about the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals acting in concert inclusion with others.
[39:50.180 --> 39:58.180]  Plaintiff's allegations regarding TCCA are entirely unclear. They all say that.
[39:58.180 --> 40:12.180]  But I asserted with specificity and particularity exactly what they did, but it's unclear.
[40:12.180 --> 40:18.180]  Oh, well, guys, I will see if I can't clarify it for you.
[40:18.180 --> 40:27.180]  That kind of opens the door for an amended complaint because I wasn't clear enough.
[40:27.180 --> 40:34.180]  Now I've got others that complained that I wasn't concise enough.
[40:34.180 --> 40:41.180]  Apparently, I was too concise for these guys.
[40:41.180 --> 40:48.180]  OK, anyway, I'm going to stop this. If you have any callers, I have my page covered up.
[40:48.180 --> 40:51.180]  Yeah, we do. We've got a couple.
[40:51.180 --> 40:55.180]  We've got a couple more slots on the board if anyone else wants to call in.
[40:55.180 --> 41:00.180]  OK, I hope you found this interesting.
[41:00.180 --> 41:06.180]  If I bore you to tears, whatever you do, don't tell me it'll hurt my feelings.
[41:06.180 --> 41:16.180]  And you know how sensitive I am, especially when I'm talking to sweet Tina.
[41:16.180 --> 41:21.180]  Hello, Miss Tina. What do you have for us today?
[41:21.180 --> 41:26.180]  Tina, you've been on the sharp end. You've been suing these guys.
[41:26.180 --> 41:29.180]  Yes, I still am.
[41:29.180 --> 41:36.180]  And I wanted to mention, I think I've got to check this, but in that loan file that I acquired from the bank,
[41:36.180 --> 41:40.180]  which they desperately tried to stop me from getting,
[41:40.180 --> 41:49.180]  I have a feeling that there is a copy of that complaint against McGinnity in my loan file.
[41:49.180 --> 41:51.180]  Wait, I couldn't hear that.
[41:51.180 --> 41:56.180]  A copy of the complaint against McGinnity in your loan file. What does that mean?
[41:56.180 --> 42:04.180]  Not McGinnity Mnuchin. I think they put what complaint I sent in into my loan file,
[42:04.180 --> 42:12.180]  even though I didn't have a loan when I did that.
[42:12.180 --> 42:17.180]  I don't follow yet. What are you saying there?
[42:17.180 --> 42:26.180]  It's a loan file that you have when you have a mortgage, and the bank keeps a loan file on you.
[42:26.180 --> 42:34.180]  And they don't ever want you to get hold of that because it has all their inter-office emails and such like in it.
[42:34.180 --> 42:42.180]  And it has everything you've ever sent to them, everything they've ever sent to you is memorialized in that loan file.
[42:42.180 --> 42:50.180]  Well, I never sent this complaint that we did against Mnuchin to the bank.
[42:50.180 --> 42:55.180]  Oh, but they found it somewhere, got a hold of it, and stuck it in the loan file.
[42:55.180 --> 42:58.180]  Yes, and it was two years after or four years after.
[42:58.180 --> 43:01.180]  I believe it's in there because I saw it.
[43:01.180 --> 43:07.180]  I've just got to check that it wasn't commingled somehow, but I don't recall doing that.
[43:07.180 --> 43:15.180]  What would that have any meaning or anything if I find all this in there?
[43:15.180 --> 43:23.180]  They're obviously following what I'm doing.
[43:23.180 --> 43:26.180]  Silence from...
[43:26.180 --> 43:29.180]  Brett, okay, I was waiting for Brett to answer.
[43:29.180 --> 43:37.180]  No, I don't know that it has any bearing to me. It seems like it doesn't necessarily show criminality.
[43:37.180 --> 43:42.180]  It's their records. They could stick some Snoopy comics in there if they felt like it.
[43:42.180 --> 43:49.180]  There's no law that says what they must and must not allow in there, right? It's their records.
[43:49.180 --> 43:57.180]  Well, it's true. They did put three other parties' information in with their social security numbers and everything.
[43:57.180 --> 44:00.180]  All right, well, let's talk some more about that on the other side.
[44:27.180 --> 44:29.180]  Ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.180 --> 44:31.180]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.180 --> 44:34.180]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[44:34.180 --> 44:37.180]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.180 --> 44:43.180]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.180 --> 44:44.180]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.180 --> 44:45.180]  No.
[44:45.180 --> 44:47.180]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.180 --> 44:48.180]  No.
[44:48.180 --> 44:49.180]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.180 --> 44:50.180]  No. I mean, yes.
[44:50.180 --> 44:55.180]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect.
[44:55.180 --> 44:57.180]  Thank you so much.
[44:57.180 --> 44:58.180]  You're welcome.
[44:58.180 --> 45:00.180]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[45:00.180 --> 45:04.180]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.180 --> 45:15.180]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.180 --> 45:19.180]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.180 --> 45:23.180]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.180 --> 45:28.180]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.180 --> 45:34.180]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.180 --> 45:43.180]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.180 --> 45:52.180]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.180 --> 46:01.180]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.180 --> 46:27.180]  Thank you for watching.
[46:52.180 --> 46:58.180]  Okay, we are back.
[46:58.180 --> 47:01.180]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[47:01.180 --> 47:07.180]  And as far as I know, they can put anything in that file they want to.
[47:07.180 --> 47:10.180]  They can put social security numbers in there.
[47:10.180 --> 47:12.180]  They can put all kinds of private stuff in there.
[47:12.180 --> 47:20.180]  What they can't do is release certain information that would be problematic, like social security numbers.
[47:20.180 --> 47:26.180]  But criminal complaints, that's public information.
[47:26.180 --> 47:33.180]  I do have social security numbers of three of the parties in my loan file.
[47:33.180 --> 47:34.180]  Whoops.
[47:34.180 --> 47:38.180]  That's an oops.
[47:38.180 --> 47:40.180]  That was a federal issue.
[47:40.180 --> 47:42.180]  Information, everything.
[47:42.180 --> 47:57.180]  It was 2008 when the feds made the clerks go through their records and remove or redact all social security numbers.
[47:57.180 --> 48:03.180]  Remember me telling about going down and filing this habeas corpus in Henderson County,
[48:03.180 --> 48:08.180]  that the ones that I got the Court of Criminal Appeals in front of a grand jury over?
[48:08.180 --> 48:10.180]  That was 2008.
[48:10.180 --> 48:15.180]  When I went down and did that, these clerks are running all over.
[48:15.180 --> 48:17.180]  And I asked them, what all is going on here?
[48:17.180 --> 48:21.180]  And they told me that they had to redact all of their records.
[48:21.180 --> 48:26.180]  And they were just going wacko, trying to get that done.
[48:26.180 --> 48:35.180]  So if they release, anyone can ask you for your social security number.
[48:35.180 --> 48:42.180]  But if they demand that you produce a social security number, that's a felony in the Fed.
[48:42.180 --> 48:44.180]  I don't know what specific law that is.
[48:44.180 --> 48:56.180]  But it was at that time, because we were having a lot of problems with identity theft, that the feds cracked down on that.
[48:56.180 --> 49:10.180]  Well, I'll find a way to figure out a way to use that against them later. But my other quick question, Brett, remember you gave me some information to send to the Texas Secretary of State's office
[49:10.180 --> 49:18.180]  in regard to these documents that are missing from the complaint file of the notary.
[49:18.180 --> 49:26.180]  And all the responses, like from the notary, her ledgers, and from the attorneys that were talking to the Secretary of State about it.
[49:26.180 --> 49:32.180]  Is this a record request that I was suggesting, or a record request I made?
[49:32.180 --> 49:36.180]  It was a record request that you suggested I make.
[49:36.180 --> 49:37.180]  Okay.
[49:37.180 --> 49:41.180]  Because you said it doesn't go missing. It's always there on the server logs.
[49:41.180 --> 49:50.180]  You advised me to ask for all files from the access logs for the servers and file systems where the notary ledgers for Michelle Ray are kept,
[49:50.180 --> 49:55.180]  and where the complaints against Michelle Ray and responses to said complaints are kept,
[49:55.180 --> 50:02.180]  where the mail communications regarding her are kept, along with VPN edge server access logs.
[50:02.180 --> 50:04.180]  Ah, yes.
[50:04.180 --> 50:17.180]  Audit trail? Yeah. Well, they came back to me and said a diligent search of the records of this office found no information responsive to your request.
[50:17.180 --> 50:26.180]  Wow. So they keep no records, or they just don't have them?
[50:26.180 --> 50:30.180]  It looks like they're saying they don't keep any.
[50:30.180 --> 50:43.180]  Well, they kept my complaint against her, and they kept a couple of the letters that the investigator sent to the notary,
[50:43.180 --> 50:53.180]  but there's none of the responses that they demanded she send, and there isn't the response and the ledgers that the attorney she hired,
[50:53.180 --> 51:02.180]  which is the same attorney I'm going after, who told her not to send me the record, that she gave them to him,
[51:02.180 --> 51:13.180]  and he gave them to the Texas Secretary of State because they told him that they were redacted improperly and they were incomplete and not legal.
[51:13.180 --> 51:16.180]  But that copy of that is not there.
[51:16.180 --> 51:23.180]  So is he saying he gave the original records to the Secretary of State or he gave copies of records to the Secretary of State?
[51:23.180 --> 51:27.180]  I don't know, because I don't know. I don't know.
[51:27.180 --> 51:35.180]  I don't have the letters because they've mysteriously lost the most important thing.
[51:35.180 --> 51:42.180]  That should get a spoliation complaint.
[51:42.180 --> 51:49.180]  Because according to what you said, Bert, they have to keep all these records on file. It's there in the computers.
[51:49.180 --> 51:52.180]  Yeah.
[51:52.180 --> 51:56.180]  They're saying it isn't. I haven't heard from the IT director.
[51:56.180 --> 52:04.180]  I did send one to him, but this went to their general counsel, Jennifer Williams, legal assistant to the general counsel.
[52:04.180 --> 52:11.180]  Oh, yeah. Jennifer Williams. She's not very happy with me right now.
[52:11.180 --> 52:16.180]  She's not very happy with me either. It's very interesting, their answer.
[52:16.180 --> 52:25.180]  Yeah. Well, she was evasive when I asked her, which one of these five bar numbers is yours, ma'am?
[52:25.180 --> 52:30.180]  Because there happen to be five attorneys in Texas that say Jennifer Williams.
[52:30.180 --> 52:37.180]  I asked her which one is hers or is there another one that's yours? And yeah, she suddenly got real quiet.
[52:37.180 --> 52:45.180]  I got a solution for that. Just bar grieve all of them and let God sort them out.
[52:45.180 --> 52:55.180]  I did that once and it was so much fun. Serendipity sometimes occurs.
[52:55.180 --> 53:00.180]  I got three lawyers named Sam Davis.
[53:00.180 --> 53:08.180]  One's in Decatur where I was working out of when I was building these complaints. One was in Fort Worth and one was in Dallas.
[53:08.180 --> 53:15.180]  So I was thinking, which one could it be? Well, it must be the one in Fort Worth.
[53:15.180 --> 53:21.180]  So I bar grieved him for what the one in Decatur did. And serendipity.
[53:21.180 --> 53:29.180]  Someone else I was working with, Robert Davis, his son was having legal problems and he is talking to the kid's attorney.
[53:29.180 --> 53:36.180]  And the guy's name was Sam Davis. He mentioned my name and the lawyer went off.
[53:36.180 --> 53:41.180]  He's a lot of bar grieve. It wasn't even my client.
[53:41.180 --> 53:48.180]  Oh, that was so funny. I called him. Oh, my bad, my bad.
[53:48.180 --> 53:55.180]  I bar grieved the wrong one. I'll send a letter to the bar and tell him, oh, this was just a big mistake.
[53:55.180 --> 54:02.180]  And then I'll bar grieve the other guy. Oh, no, don't do that.
[54:02.180 --> 54:13.180]  I figured if I just make a little effort, it doesn't have to be much, but a good faith effort to reach out to the Jennifer Williams who's doing these things.
[54:13.180 --> 54:22.180]  And I asked her which of these five, if she doesn't answer me, then later, if I bar grieve all of the other ones and tell,
[54:22.180 --> 54:27.180]  and I include in there that she wouldn't identify which of the ones.
[54:27.180 --> 54:32.180]  And so you're getting this one. It might not be you. I'm not sure.
[54:32.180 --> 54:37.180]  And if it is, I'll apologize to the bar and tell them it wasn't you.
[54:37.180 --> 54:40.180]  Right. But then they all know that it was her.
[54:40.180 --> 54:49.180]  All of the other Jennifer Williams will know that it was the Jennifer Williams that's the assistant legal counsel.
[54:49.180 --> 54:59.180]  Right. So I think I think that's I like that. I think it's kind of fun to for them to know that about each other.
[54:59.180 --> 55:03.180]  Oh, yeah. So where do I go with this?
[55:03.180 --> 55:16.180]  Going after them for spoiling all the records, except the not so important, all the important stuff they've I think they're in collusion with the attorneys to just say it's not there.
[55:16.180 --> 55:21.180]  So they don't want me to get it. Well, that raises a question, Brett.
[55:21.180 --> 55:31.180]  Does spoilation give a litigant a claim?
[55:31.180 --> 55:35.180]  Not everything that's done wrong gives you a claim.
[55:35.180 --> 55:46.180]  How can we frame the hiding? You could put that civilly. You could put it into breach of duty. Fiduciary duty.
[55:46.180 --> 55:51.180]  Yes. Does they have a fiduciary duty to her, to Tina?
[55:51.180 --> 55:59.180]  No, not to her, but to keep the records for the people. They have a duty to know where they keep the records.
[55:59.180 --> 56:05.180]  Oh, wait. OK. Are these their records or these government records?
[56:05.180 --> 56:12.180]  They're government records and they're trying to tell Tina that they don't have them and they don't even know where they would be kept because some of the questions.
[56:12.180 --> 56:19.180]  Yeah. Some of the questions that Tina was talking about just now are questions that are kind of like your scope and content.
[56:19.180 --> 56:26.180]  They're meta questions that say, where are these records? How are they kept? And they're like, well, don't have any of that.
[56:26.180 --> 56:32.180]  Sorry. So some answers go to a breach of duty, sounds like.
[56:32.180 --> 56:42.180]  Then the question that begs is, if you had records of this type, where would they be?
[56:42.180 --> 56:59.180]  One of the things you had me ask was, I wanted records showing non-repudiation measures you have in place to ensure authenticity and integrity of changes to the above mentioned data.
[56:59.180 --> 57:00.180]  Oh, that's right.
[57:00.180 --> 57:03.180]  And for those access on the file server and VP.
[57:03.180 --> 57:06.180]  That's some good terminology right there.
[57:06.180 --> 57:09.180]  It was. Thank you.
[57:09.180 --> 57:19.180]  Yeah. So those would be show me the measures that you have in place is kind of like, show me that you are responsible with your data.
[57:19.180 --> 57:32.180]  And they're saying, got no records responsive to your request means we have no procedures to be responsible.
[57:32.180 --> 57:34.180]  Interesting.
[57:34.180 --> 57:42.180]  It's almost as if they're telling you, we allow anybody and everybody to edit our data and we keep no audit trails on anything.
[57:42.180 --> 57:45.180]  That's what it says.
[57:45.180 --> 57:47.180]  Really?
[57:47.180 --> 58:08.180]  And I'm just looking up spoilation of evidence in Texas and criminal law to receive an instruction, a defendant must prove the state lost or destroyed the evidence in bad faith. This requires showing improper motives such as a personal animus against the defendant or a desire to prevent the defendant from obtaining useful evidence.
[58:08.180 --> 58:11.180]  What are you looking at?
[58:11.180 --> 58:15.180]  Online. Spoilation and Texas criminal law.
[58:15.180 --> 58:23.180]  Good, good. Yeah, that's exactly what it sounded like to both Brett and I, that this was deliberate spoilation.
[58:23.180 --> 58:30.180]  What I'm wondering is, does spoilation give you a claim?
[58:30.180 --> 58:39.180]  Well, the Texas Supreme Court, when you come back, I'm just reading it, it articulates evidence for relation framework here.
[58:39.180 --> 58:41.180]  Okay, good. Perfect.
[58:41.180 --> 58:45.180]  How did you time that so close when you can't see the clock?
[58:45.180 --> 58:50.180]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.180 --> 58:58.180]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.180 --> 59:06.180]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.180 --> 59:09.180]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.180 --> 59:18.180]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.180 --> 59:28.180]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.180 --> 59:33.180]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.180 --> 59:47.180]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.180 --> 59:50.180]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.180 --> 01:00:00.180]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.180 --> 01:00:05.180]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.180 --> 01:00:09.180]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.180 --> 01:00:11.180]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:11.180 --> 01:00:17.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.180 --> 01:00:19.180]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.180 --> 01:00:22.180]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.180 --> 01:00:27.180]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.180 --> 01:00:32.180]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.180 --> 01:00:35.180]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.180 --> 01:00:42.180]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:42.180 --> 01:00:46.180]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:00:46.180 --> 01:00:48.180]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.180 --> 01:00:51.180]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:51.180 --> 01:00:55.180]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.180 --> 01:01:01.180]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.180 --> 01:01:07.180]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.180 --> 01:01:09.180]  Third party, Third Amendment? Get it?
[01:01:09.180 --> 01:01:17.180]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.180 --> 01:01:32.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.180 --> 01:01:35.180]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.180 --> 01:01:39.180]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.180 --> 01:01:40.180]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.180 --> 01:01:47.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.180 --> 01:01:49.180]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.180 --> 01:01:52.180]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.180 --> 01:01:57.180]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.180 --> 01:02:02.180]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.180 --> 01:02:05.180]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.180 --> 01:02:12.180]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.180 --> 01:02:16.180]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.180 --> 01:02:22.180]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.180 --> 01:02:27.180]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:27.180 --> 01:02:31.180]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[01:02:31.180 --> 01:02:35.180]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:02:35.180 --> 01:02:40.180]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.180 --> 01:02:47.180]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.180 --> 01:02:54.180]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:54.180 --> 01:03:01.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Ulbricht. More news and information at CatherineUlbricht.com.
[01:03:24.180 --> 01:03:51.180]  Okay, we are back. Randy Carlson, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[01:03:51.180 --> 01:03:54.180]  Okay, Tina, where were we?
[01:03:54.180 --> 01:04:01.180]  We were talking about the Secretary of State required to do something about spoilation.
[01:04:01.180 --> 01:04:09.180]  And it says here the Texas Supreme Court set out to clarify the common law rules that governs spoilation of evidence in Texas.
[01:04:09.180 --> 01:04:13.180]  And held that spoilation analysis involves a two-step judicial process.
[01:04:13.180 --> 01:04:19.180]  The trial court, rather than the jury, must determine as a question of law whether the party spoiled evidence.
[01:04:19.180 --> 01:04:25.180]  If spoilation occurred, the court must then assess the appropriate remedy.
[01:04:25.180 --> 01:04:38.180]  And then it talks about in determining whether the spoilation occurred, the court found that the trial court must find that the spoiling – spoiling party had a duty to reasonably preserve evidence.
[01:04:38.180 --> 01:04:44.180]  And the party intentionally or negligently breached that duty by failing to do so.
[01:04:44.180 --> 01:04:51.180]  So, you know, if the party finds that a party did not spoil evidence under the standard, the inquiry ends.
[01:04:51.180 --> 01:04:57.180]  Upon a finding of spoilation, the trial court must turn to step two.
[01:04:57.180 --> 01:05:16.180]  So – and this was – they obviously knew that the case was going on involving these documents because the attorney that I was in a case with, he contacted them and said he was – the notary was his client.
[01:05:16.180 --> 01:05:21.180]  That's the notary in Texas was the attorney in California's client.
[01:05:21.180 --> 01:05:28.180]  And he's not licensed to practice law in Texas, only in California.
[01:05:28.180 --> 01:05:29.180]  So –
[01:05:29.180 --> 01:05:39.180]  That should get a complaint of him practicing law in Texas without a license.
[01:05:39.180 --> 01:05:42.180]  Does that go to California or to Texas?
[01:05:42.180 --> 01:05:46.180]  No, that goes to Texas.
[01:05:46.180 --> 01:05:54.180]  The legal practice of law, but that's not enough. He'd have to hold himself out as an attorney.
[01:05:54.180 --> 01:06:02.180]  The thing of spoilation, what my concern was, is it did not grant a remedy.
[01:06:02.180 --> 01:06:05.180]  It did not create a claim for you.
[01:06:05.180 --> 01:06:10.180]  It left the handling of the issue of spoilation to the court.
[01:06:10.180 --> 01:06:16.180]  And it specifically said that the remedy would be crafted by the court.
[01:06:16.180 --> 01:06:32.180]  Yeah. It says here that noted – the Supreme Court noted, however, that spoilation is essentially a particularized form of discovery abuse and that any remedy must have a direct relationship to the act of spoilation it is meant to cure.
[01:06:32.180 --> 01:06:43.180]  The court provided several key considerations for trial courts weighing the culpability of the spoiling party and the prejudice to the non-spoiling party.
[01:06:43.180 --> 01:06:48.180]  Yeah, it's not something you could sue directly for.
[01:06:48.180 --> 01:06:59.180]  You would have to already have a claim and then have them interfere with your ability to adjudicate your claim.
[01:06:59.180 --> 01:07:03.180]  So you're just saying you're back to breach of duty.
[01:07:03.180 --> 01:07:08.180]  Back to breach of duty.
[01:07:08.180 --> 01:07:22.180]  Yeah, because in the process of them doing their duties of office – I mean, these are not people whose job is to paint the walls and do whatever facilities management.
[01:07:22.180 --> 01:07:36.180]  They have a different kind of job, the IT director people. They have a job to manage data and to make sure that data – the data integrity is intact.
[01:07:36.180 --> 01:07:51.180]  They have a job to pay attention to server access logs and see that unauthorized users are not just willy-nilly editing everything. It's their job.
[01:07:51.180 --> 01:07:57.180]  So do I – if I don't hear directly from the IT director –
[01:07:57.180 --> 01:08:09.180]  No, it doesn't matter. If you've got some attorney that's throwing the IT director under the bus and saying he doesn't do his job, fine, whatever. It doesn't have to come directly from him.
[01:08:09.180 --> 01:08:14.180]  Ah, you can sue the IT director for misfeasance in office.
[01:08:14.180 --> 01:08:22.180]  Right. At the word of the attorney, he doesn't do his job.
[01:08:22.180 --> 01:08:28.180]  And let him throw somebody else under the bus. Oh, are they going to be P.O.ed at him?
[01:08:28.180 --> 01:08:39.180]  Just like in my case, where the Office of Court Administration director threw the chief justice under the bus.
[01:08:39.180 --> 01:08:44.180]  Great. Yeah, let him.
[01:08:44.180 --> 01:08:55.180]  Okay. According to this attorney, what this attorney is saying, the IT director is guilty of not doing even the basics of his job.
[01:08:55.180 --> 01:09:12.180]  Misfeasance. Misfeasance can be defined as – that would give you a tort and maybe a claim under 3902.
[01:09:12.180 --> 01:09:13.180]  Abuse of office?
[01:09:13.180 --> 01:09:16.180]  Yeah.
[01:09:16.180 --> 01:09:19.180]  How's that connected?
[01:09:19.180 --> 01:09:23.180]  Misappropriation of public funds would come under 3902.
[01:09:23.180 --> 01:09:27.180]  Ah, okay, yeah. Drawing a paycheck and not doing even the basics.
[01:09:27.180 --> 01:09:29.180]  Yeah.
[01:09:29.180 --> 01:09:31.180]  Okay.
[01:09:31.180 --> 01:09:36.180]  Okay, we need to move on. We've got a whole board full of callers.
[01:09:36.180 --> 01:09:39.180]  Thank you for this information. Appreciate it.
[01:09:39.180 --> 01:09:45.180]  Thank you, Katina. Okay, now we're going to go to David in Kansas. Hello, David.
[01:09:45.180 --> 01:09:59.180]  Hi, this is David. I got questions written down. I was calling to find out if you plead guilty to a traffic citation and you know it didn't have any subject matter jurisdiction, how do you attack that?
[01:09:59.180 --> 01:10:16.180]  You can challenge subject matter jurisdiction no matter how remote in history. If they did not have subject matter jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction never accrues and it cannot be waived.
[01:10:16.180 --> 01:10:42.180]  Yep. Okay, that's what I've read as well. All right. My next question is, I'm under a failure to appear and I want to take care of this and there's a new DA on the case. I'm sending in some criminal complaints about the old DA and the old assistant DA who brought this case. My question is, when I send these to the new DA, should I make contact with her to see if she's going to proceed in a case?
[01:10:42.180 --> 01:11:04.180]  Okay, yes. Before you do that, call the court wherever you have the failure to appear and be contrite. Sorry I failed to appear. How can we fix this? Can you set me another appearance date so I can come in and we can get this cleared up?
[01:11:04.180 --> 01:11:12.180]  Okay, I did try to send an email and they didn't respond at all.
[01:11:12.180 --> 01:11:15.180]  What state are you in does this say?
[01:11:15.180 --> 01:11:18.180]  This is for Colorado.
[01:11:18.180 --> 01:11:37.180]  Oh, Colorado, okay. I'm not sure what the code is, but every complaint that I've ever heard, every warrant that I've ever seen said, arrest this person and bring him before me.
[01:11:37.180 --> 01:11:53.180]  So if you can't get this done another way, find out when the court is going to have hearings. Best time is when, if it's a municipal court, it's just when they have a hearing date planned and go down there.
[01:11:53.180 --> 01:12:01.180]  Yeah, it's a little ways away from me and they've been very aggressive towards me.
[01:12:01.180 --> 01:12:12.180]  Well, if they arrest you when you're in front of the judge, that gives you a false imprisonment suit. They'll almost always write you a check on that one.
[01:12:12.180 --> 01:12:18.180]  I think I already have that actually. They arrested me without probable cause.
[01:12:18.180 --> 01:12:22.180]  It's all off the top conclusions.
[01:12:22.180 --> 01:12:27.180]  There's never been a menstrual determination in the case at all.
[01:12:27.180 --> 01:12:31.180]  They should have worn off that after David a probable cause.
[01:12:31.180 --> 01:12:35.180]  They issued the complaint, which that's my next question.
[01:12:35.180 --> 01:12:42.180]  My next question is if the complaint is just the statute replayed.
[01:12:42.180 --> 01:12:44.180]  How do I reply to that?
[01:12:44.180 --> 01:12:52.180]  You know, of course, you know, if they go by my motion, how do I reply to a complaint that has nothing in it?
[01:12:52.180 --> 01:12:59.180]  You file a motion to suppress as insufficient.
[01:12:59.180 --> 01:13:01.180]  Okay.
[01:13:01.180 --> 01:13:02.180]  Thank you.
[01:13:02.180 --> 01:13:06.180]  I think that was it.
[01:13:06.180 --> 01:13:11.180]  Yep, that was it. I appreciate you guys.
[01:13:11.180 --> 01:13:18.180]  Okay, I don't feel like we gave you too much, but good luck.
[01:13:18.180 --> 01:13:22.180]  You know, I try to listen to you guys.
[01:13:22.180 --> 01:13:24.180]  I mean, it's my decision what I do with my case.
[01:13:24.180 --> 01:13:32.180]  I know more about it and Brett's read some of my stuff and I'll be asking more questions in the channel.
[01:13:32.180 --> 01:13:39.180]  But I'm not sure what else I could ask in a short period of time.
[01:13:39.180 --> 01:13:42.180]  Okay, well, keep us up to speed on how this goes.
[01:13:42.180 --> 01:13:43.180]  Thanks for calling.
[01:13:43.180 --> 01:13:45.180]  Thank you, Brett.
[01:13:45.180 --> 01:13:48.180]  Okay, now we're going to go to Vivian in Florida.
[01:13:48.180 --> 01:13:50.180]  Hello, Vivian.
[01:13:50.180 --> 01:13:53.180]  What do you have for us today?
[01:13:53.180 --> 01:13:54.180]  All righty.
[01:13:54.180 --> 01:13:58.180]  I'm doing well and I hope you guys are doing well.
[01:13:58.180 --> 01:14:00.180]  I've got some questions.
[01:14:00.180 --> 01:14:01.180]  I called you.
[01:14:01.180 --> 01:14:08.180]  I'm a newbie and don't know 100% what I'm doing, although I have been learning in this two year.
[01:14:08.180 --> 01:14:09.180]  Wait a minute.
[01:14:09.180 --> 01:14:10.180]  Wait a minute.
[01:14:10.180 --> 01:14:16.180]  You're a woman and women know everything.
[01:14:16.180 --> 01:14:18.180]  I'm married to one.
[01:14:18.180 --> 01:14:27.180]  She even knows what I was going to think before I thought it and holds me responsible for it.
[01:14:27.180 --> 01:14:34.180]  But she's gone to bed, so she's not hearing me saying this.
[01:14:34.180 --> 01:14:42.180]  Well, the reason why I'm calling tonight is to just go over – I called you about a month or a month and a half ago.
[01:14:42.180 --> 01:14:45.180]  You gave me some good information that I'm working on.
[01:14:45.180 --> 01:15:02.180]  But I want to follow up on my case later on by suing the police department and probably the state's attorney's office for this particular thing.
[01:15:02.180 --> 01:15:09.180]  They trespassed my granddaughter.
[01:15:09.180 --> 01:15:16.180]  This is about my granddaughter that was living in a camper and everything was stolen, so I'm still working on that.
[01:15:16.180 --> 01:15:25.180]  But the police trespassed her from her own camper, home camper.
[01:15:25.180 --> 01:15:34.180]  And when they trespassed her, they said if you come back on the property, then you're going to get arrested.
[01:15:34.180 --> 01:15:38.180]  So she had to leave her camper home.
[01:15:38.180 --> 01:15:40.180]  Did she tell them that's my property?
[01:15:40.180 --> 01:15:42.180]  All of her property.
[01:15:42.180 --> 01:15:47.180]  Did she tell them that that's her home?
[01:15:47.180 --> 01:15:55.180]  Oh, you know, I don't know, and they purged the body cam, so I can't get a hold of the body cam.
[01:15:55.180 --> 01:15:59.180]  Oh, that's not good. Uncool.
[01:15:59.180 --> 01:16:14.180]  Uncool. So they have purged actually all of the three visits that they made on that day where her daughters tried to get it and so did I try to get it.
[01:16:14.180 --> 01:16:18.180]  So all of those files have been purged.
[01:16:18.180 --> 01:16:21.180]  How long ago did this occur?
[01:16:21.180 --> 01:16:27.180]  Oh, this happened two years ago. I'm still working on the case. The trial's coming up in November, but not with the police.
[01:16:27.180 --> 01:16:32.180]  By saying they purged them, that implies that they did something improper.
[01:16:32.180 --> 01:16:42.180]  Normally, a jurisdiction will hold records over an uncontested issue for six months, and then they'll reuse the tapes.
[01:16:42.180 --> 01:16:49.180]  Some even less. They don't have enough storage, and so they will routinely delete before that.
[01:16:49.180 --> 01:16:55.180]  If you've asked for those records and then they purged, then we have an issue.
[01:16:55.180 --> 01:17:24.180]  Hold on just a second. We're just about to go to our sponsors. We'll be right back.
[01:17:24.180 --> 01:17:31.180]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[01:17:31.180 --> 01:17:38.180]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.180 --> 01:17:43.180]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.180 --> 01:17:49.180]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:49.180 --> 01:17:59.180]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:19.180 --> 01:18:34.180]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.180 --> 01:18:41.180]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.180 --> 01:18:49.180]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.180 --> 01:19:00.180]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.180 --> 01:19:11.180]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.180 --> 01:19:40.180]  Thank you for watching.
[01:20:00.180 --> 01:20:11.180]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rhett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. We're talking to Vivian in Florida.
[01:20:11.180 --> 01:20:15.180]  Okay, Vivian, go ahead.
[01:20:15.180 --> 01:20:40.180]  All righty. So yes, we were talking about the purges. They have different periods of time where they purge the files and it depends on what type of incident it is. So this particular one was 60 days or 90 days. I can't quite remember. So they ended up purging that.
[01:20:40.180 --> 01:20:51.180]  Okay, so this wasn't an act of spoilation where they destroyed the records for lascivious purposes. This is just the normal part of doing business.
[01:20:51.180 --> 01:21:05.180]  Apparently, it's normal for them, of which I have addressed it with them. But yes, it's normal for them. And they do have it on their website, which after two years, finally they brought me there.
[01:21:05.180 --> 01:21:14.180]  And it states how long they keep them. So they purge that.
[01:21:14.180 --> 01:21:38.180]  Now, I mean, let's move ahead. So three months later, we were able to get a body cam from a month later and two months later where we tried to go back to get the camper. And even though the camper was on their property,
[01:21:38.180 --> 01:21:53.180]  they would not allow us to get it because they were renting it out. And well, the first time they said they sold it and there was somebody living in it. The second time they were renting out her camper, making $400 a month on it.
[01:21:53.180 --> 01:22:17.180]  So the police said basically, too bad, so sad, civil matter. Okay. This happened in August of 21. And in November of 21, I was adamant about making, when I found out they had sold everything,
[01:22:17.180 --> 01:22:33.180]  I was adamant about them writing up a report that included all of her property, which they failed to address in their very short report.
[01:22:33.180 --> 01:22:48.180]  So it turned out that they wrote this report for grand theft, but they said they can't put on the report who took it because there's no witnesses.
[01:22:48.180 --> 01:23:00.180]  Okay. Now, so that's ridiculous because they seized all her property and I don't know how to address that. They will not give it to the state's attorney.
[01:23:00.180 --> 01:23:07.180]  Okay, hold on, hold on. I'm having a little problem. You're using too many pronouns.
[01:23:07.180 --> 01:23:08.180]  Okay.
[01:23:08.180 --> 01:23:12.180]  You're using they all over the place and I'm not sure who all they refers to.
[01:23:12.180 --> 01:23:23.180]  Oh, they police. I was meaning they, the police. I'm sorry. I'll go ahead and make sure I try to do that. You're helping me out here.
[01:23:23.180 --> 01:23:33.180]  So the police, I had a special meeting with the police. They agreed to go out and write up a report.
[01:23:33.180 --> 01:23:55.180]  It was written up as a grand theft report, but they refused to say who did it because they're saying that nobody actually saw them, I guess, steal it.
[01:23:55.180 --> 01:24:01.180]  And they don't want to say anything because it's still in civil court. Does that make any sense?
[01:24:01.180 --> 01:24:05.180]  Yes, it does. Okay, help me out there.
[01:24:05.180 --> 01:24:21.180]  They're trying not to take a side. And if they're in civil court and these guys make a definitive statement of that nature, it would affect the civil litigation.
[01:24:21.180 --> 01:24:26.180]  So then the police themselves could wind up being sued.
[01:24:26.180 --> 01:24:31.180]  Oh, okay. Well- So they're trying to be careful.
[01:24:31.180 --> 01:25:00.180]  Okay. I'm trying to sue them anyway because from what I did is I had, now it was in small claims court then and I put it into, put the case, I put a new case in or transferred it over into circuit civil because now I included all of the property that she had.
[01:25:00.180 --> 01:25:10.180]  And so I put it in circuit civil just and that was in July of 22.
[01:25:10.180 --> 01:25:34.180]  Now in March of 23, I find out that they went in and a detective made an investigation. And when they made that investigation, because they couldn't contact, it wasn't a very good detective as far as I'm concerned.
[01:25:34.180 --> 01:25:47.180]  But anyway, they said they could not make contact with the victim after going to see her and contacting her umpteen times and mailing something to her.
[01:25:47.180 --> 01:25:56.180]  And they made what I felt was derogatory remarks and they closed the file.
[01:25:56.180 --> 01:26:00.180]  So I find out this by mistake.
[01:26:00.180 --> 01:26:14.180]  Okay, wait, wait a minute, hold on. Tell us where you're going so we'll know how to interpret the information you're giving us. You gave me a lot of information, but at this point I have no idea what to do with it.
[01:26:14.180 --> 01:26:21.180]  So it's hard to remember all of it unless I have some content, context.
[01:26:21.180 --> 01:26:32.180]  Okay, I'm trying to see and I think that I can sue them for liability because- Wait, wait, wait, wait. Pronouns, pronouns, pronouns. Sue them.
[01:26:32.180 --> 01:26:34.180]  Sue the police?
[01:26:34.180 --> 01:26:39.180]  Police. Yeah, I guess that's what I'm addressing everything about is police.
[01:26:39.180 --> 01:26:40.180]  Oh, okay.
[01:26:40.180 --> 01:26:43.180]  You want to sue the police?
[01:26:43.180 --> 01:26:53.180]  Yeah, sue the police for closing it and they said they lost the file for a year and that's why they didn't investigate it.
[01:26:53.180 --> 01:26:59.180]  That it shouldn't have gotten this far.
[01:26:59.180 --> 01:27:06.180]  I am trying to figure out what kind of claim you would have.
[01:27:06.180 --> 01:27:07.180]  I know.
[01:27:07.180 --> 01:27:12.180]  The police do not have a duty to protect you.
[01:27:12.180 --> 01:27:13.180]  Okay.
[01:27:13.180 --> 01:27:25.180]  So what duty did they have that you can use a failure to perform as a claim against the police?
[01:27:25.180 --> 01:27:29.180]  A failure to perform?
[01:27:29.180 --> 01:27:34.180]  Yeah, I'm trying to figure out how you can get a claim against the police.
[01:27:34.180 --> 01:27:35.180]  Okay.
[01:27:35.180 --> 01:27:44.180]  Nothing comes to my mind so far. It doesn't seem to quite line up with any duty I can think of.
[01:27:44.180 --> 01:28:00.180]  Well, okay. I guess what triggered some things is that they said they lost it and then it says the victim refused to cooperate and identify the suspect.
[01:28:00.180 --> 01:28:02.180]  What?
[01:28:02.180 --> 01:28:06.180]  Yes, that's what they're saying.
[01:28:06.180 --> 01:28:13.180]  I mean, it even gets more complicated than that but this was how they closed the file.
[01:28:13.180 --> 01:28:18.180]  Now, the original report says that she lives nowhere.
[01:28:18.180 --> 01:28:20.180]  Okay, it says nowhere.
[01:28:20.180 --> 01:28:41.180]  So what the police did is they went to the perpetrator's house and they left notes on the door and they left the card and they mailed there that they were trying to get a hold of her.
[01:28:41.180 --> 01:28:44.180]  They sent it to their address.
[01:28:44.180 --> 01:29:02.180]  Now, my name as witness slash grandmother on there was there as witness of doing all of these things and they never contacted me.
[01:29:02.180 --> 01:29:06.180]  Did they have a duty to contact you?
[01:29:06.180 --> 01:29:08.180]  I don't know.
[01:29:08.180 --> 01:29:16.180]  And before we can make a claim, we have to make all your claims in terms of some duty.
[01:29:16.180 --> 01:29:19.180]  Yeah.
[01:29:19.180 --> 01:29:25.180]  You pick the claims you make very carefully so that they coincide with a duty that the police have.
[01:29:25.180 --> 01:29:36.180]  And I haven't heard anything that really rings a bell for me on where they have violated a duty.
[01:29:36.180 --> 01:29:40.180]  They obviously tried to find her and you're just saying they didn't try hard enough.
[01:29:40.180 --> 01:29:44.180]  Well, that's really subjective.
[01:29:44.180 --> 01:29:49.180]  In order to get a claim, you have to have something more substantial.
[01:29:49.180 --> 01:29:56.180]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:56.180 --> 01:30:02.180]  We got two callers, two segments.
[01:30:02.180 --> 01:30:09.180]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:09.180 --> 01:30:12.180]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.180 --> 01:30:16.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.180 --> 01:30:18.180]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.180 --> 01:30:22.180]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.180 --> 01:30:27.180]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.180 --> 01:30:32.180]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.180 --> 01:30:35.180]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.180 --> 01:30:42.180]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.180 --> 01:30:46.180]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.180 --> 01:30:49.180]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:49.180 --> 01:30:52.180]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:52.180 --> 01:30:56.180]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:56.180 --> 01:31:00.180]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:31:00.180 --> 01:31:04.180]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.180 --> 01:31:10.180]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:10.180 --> 01:31:15.180]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:15.180 --> 01:31:18.180]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:31:18.180 --> 01:31:21.180]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.180 --> 01:31:31.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.180 --> 01:31:36.180]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.180 --> 01:31:38.180]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.180 --> 01:31:43.180]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.180 --> 01:31:46.180]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.180 --> 01:31:49.180]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.180 --> 01:31:51.180]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.180 --> 01:31:52.180]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.180 --> 01:31:53.180]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.180 --> 01:31:54.180]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.180 --> 01:31:55.180]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.180 --> 01:31:58.180]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.180 --> 01:32:02.180]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.180 --> 01:32:06.180]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:06.180 --> 01:32:08.180]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:08.180 --> 01:32:10.180]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.180 --> 01:32:13.180]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.180 --> 01:32:16.180]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.180 --> 01:32:18.180]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.180 --> 01:32:20.180]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.180 --> 01:32:23.180]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:23.180 --> 01:32:26.180]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.180 --> 01:32:29.180]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.180 --> 01:32:32.180]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.180 --> 01:32:34.180]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.180 --> 01:32:36.180]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.180 --> 01:32:38.180]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:38.180 --> 01:32:41.180]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.180 --> 01:32:43.180]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.180 --> 01:32:46.180]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.180 --> 01:32:48.180]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:48.180 --> 01:32:51.180]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.180 --> 01:32:53.180]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:53.180 --> 01:32:56.180]  from ruleoflawradio.com, order your copy today,
[01:32:56.180 --> 01:33:00.180]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:02.180 --> 01:33:05.180]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[01:33:05.180 --> 01:33:08.180]  logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:08.180 --> 01:33:11.180]  Thank you for listening.
[01:33:38.180 --> 01:33:41.180]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:41.180 --> 01:33:44.180]  Randy Kelkin, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:44.180 --> 01:33:47.180]  And we're talking to Vivian in Florida.
[01:33:47.180 --> 01:34:12.180]  Okay, Vivian, of all the stuff they do,
[01:34:12.180 --> 01:34:16.180]  you always have to think of everything they're doing
[01:34:16.180 --> 01:34:22.180]  in terms of how it will create a claim for you.
[01:34:22.180 --> 01:34:24.180]  What duty do they have?
[01:34:24.180 --> 01:34:26.180]  And so far, what you've spoken to are the police
[01:34:26.180 --> 01:34:28.180]  are actually doing something.
[01:34:28.180 --> 01:34:32.180]  They're just not doing it good enough.
[01:34:32.180 --> 01:34:37.180]  Would it be an issue if, because they said,
[01:34:37.180 --> 01:34:42.180]  I said, why did it take you 15 months to investigate?
[01:34:42.180 --> 01:34:47.180]  And they said the file was lost.
[01:34:47.180 --> 01:34:48.180]  Okay.
[01:34:48.180 --> 01:34:52.180]  Yeah, that goes to some incompetence of some kind.
[01:34:52.180 --> 01:34:54.180]  Yeah, but that doesn't bring you a claim.
[01:34:54.180 --> 01:34:57.180]  You have to have some kind of mens rea
[01:34:57.180 --> 01:35:04.180]  or some kind of specific duty not to lose the file.
[01:35:04.180 --> 01:35:07.180]  Oh, okay.
[01:35:07.180 --> 01:35:10.180]  Because the sergeant is saying this never should have happened.
[01:35:10.180 --> 01:35:13.180]  It should have been done a year ago.
[01:35:13.180 --> 01:35:17.180]  The sergeant that I, yeah, the sergeant that I spoke with.
[01:35:17.180 --> 01:35:21.180]  Well, that sounds like misfeasance in office.
[01:35:21.180 --> 01:35:23.180]  I'm sorry, what?
[01:35:23.180 --> 01:35:27.180]  Well, if he's saying it should have been done,
[01:35:27.180 --> 01:35:30.180]  if they had a duty to do it and didn't do it,
[01:35:30.180 --> 01:35:34.180]  then you could maybe claim misfeasance.
[01:35:34.180 --> 01:35:35.180]  Okay.
[01:35:35.180 --> 01:35:40.180]  But you'd have to show that.
[01:35:40.180 --> 01:35:43.180]  You don't have much to go on, but you've got his words.
[01:35:43.180 --> 01:35:46.180]  He says should have, that's better than him saying,
[01:35:46.180 --> 01:35:48.180]  oh, man, come on, we do our best.
[01:35:48.180 --> 01:35:49.180]  We're working on things.
[01:35:49.180 --> 01:35:51.180]  We can't take care of everything.
[01:35:51.180 --> 01:35:53.180]  If he had said that, you'd have literally nothing.
[01:35:53.180 --> 01:35:57.180]  But because he told you this should have never happened this way.
[01:35:57.180 --> 01:36:00.180]  Okay, well, now you've got a little something.
[01:36:00.180 --> 01:36:02.180]  It's not much, but.
[01:36:02.180 --> 01:36:04.180]  But a little.
[01:36:04.180 --> 01:36:05.180]  Okay.
[01:36:05.180 --> 01:36:06.180]  Okay.
[01:36:06.180 --> 01:36:11.180]  And do we have, what about the way that the report was written up?
[01:36:11.180 --> 01:36:13.180]  Do we have anything against that?
[01:36:13.180 --> 01:36:21.180]  It's like the victim has refused to contact me and has closed the file.
[01:36:21.180 --> 01:36:22.180]  Wait a minute.
[01:36:22.180 --> 01:36:25.180]  The victim refused to contact me.
[01:36:25.180 --> 01:36:30.180]  And what was the other one?
[01:36:30.180 --> 01:36:32.180]  To identify the suspect.
[01:36:32.180 --> 01:36:34.180]  Yeah, case suspended.
[01:36:34.180 --> 01:36:41.180]  Victim refused to cooperate and identify the suspect.
[01:36:41.180 --> 01:36:47.180]  Was that a, well, even if that was untrue,
[01:36:47.180 --> 01:36:53.180]  that is from the officer's perspective.
[01:36:53.180 --> 01:36:58.180]  I don't hear anything that would give you a claim.
[01:36:58.180 --> 01:36:59.180]  Okay.
[01:36:59.180 --> 01:37:03.180]  Because it's not like misfeasance, like the officer didn't do anything.
[01:37:03.180 --> 01:37:05.180]  He did something.
[01:37:05.180 --> 01:37:09.180]  And you're just saying he didn't do a good enough job.
[01:37:09.180 --> 01:37:10.180]  Right.
[01:37:10.180 --> 01:37:12.180]  He didn't do a good enough job a year later.
[01:37:12.180 --> 01:37:13.180]  No.
[01:37:13.180 --> 01:37:16.180]  And then there was that about her that wasn't true.
[01:37:16.180 --> 01:37:23.180]  And that's, since the officer has no duty to protect you,
[01:37:23.180 --> 01:37:26.180]  it would be hard to find a claim in there.
[01:37:26.180 --> 01:37:27.180]  Okay.
[01:37:27.180 --> 01:37:33.180]  What about that they're not arresting the people that did it?
[01:37:33.180 --> 01:37:40.180]  Not something over which you have standing.
[01:37:40.180 --> 01:37:48.180]  In before we had public prosecutors, then you could pursue that yourself.
[01:37:48.180 --> 01:37:52.180]  You could act like a private prosecutor.
[01:37:52.180 --> 01:38:00.180]  But since we have public prosecutors now, they have, what's the term, Brett,
[01:38:00.180 --> 01:38:03.180]  exclusive authority to prosecute.
[01:38:03.180 --> 01:38:05.180]  You can't do that.
[01:38:05.180 --> 01:38:13.180]  And it's left to their discretion how they prosecute.
[01:38:13.180 --> 01:38:16.180]  You won't be able to get a claim there.
[01:38:16.180 --> 01:38:23.180]  The only place you might get a claim with that kind of thing that I know of is in Pennsylvania.
[01:38:23.180 --> 01:38:29.180]  Because in Pennsylvania, you have a certain amount of standing concerning a prosecution.
[01:38:29.180 --> 01:38:34.180]  It's a little too complex to explain here why, but you have some standing.
[01:38:34.180 --> 01:38:40.180]  A prosecutor can exercise discretion, and because of that, you have standing.
[01:38:40.180 --> 01:38:43.180]  But that's the only state I know of.
[01:38:43.180 --> 01:38:44.180]  Okay.
[01:38:44.180 --> 01:38:49.180]  Everywhere else, the prosecutor's exclusive one that does the prosecution.
[01:38:49.180 --> 01:38:56.180]  And if you don't like the way he does it, there's not much you can do about that.
[01:38:56.180 --> 01:39:02.180]  Okay, so even though she was made homeless for a year because they didn't investigate it more so,
[01:39:02.180 --> 01:39:05.180]  I have to just let it go at this point in time.
[01:39:05.180 --> 01:39:09.180]  Well, I can't find a claim.
[01:39:09.180 --> 01:39:10.180]  Okay.
[01:39:10.180 --> 01:39:16.180]  And I'm on your side, but I can't, and from what you've told me, I can't find a claim.
[01:39:16.180 --> 01:39:24.180]  Now, not against the police, against the ones who allegedly stole her property, those you have a claim against.
[01:39:24.180 --> 01:39:26.180]  Yes.
[01:39:26.180 --> 01:39:33.180]  Well, and okay, so I understand about the police thing.
[01:39:33.180 --> 01:39:37.180]  Did you hear the first part of the show?
[01:39:37.180 --> 01:39:39.180]  No, I did not.
[01:39:39.180 --> 01:39:40.180]  I got on it.
[01:39:40.180 --> 01:39:41.180]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:39:41.180 --> 01:39:44.180]  Oh, I'm heartbroken.
[01:39:44.180 --> 01:39:46.180]  What?
[01:39:46.180 --> 01:39:48.180]  Her world doesn't revolve around you.
[01:39:48.180 --> 01:39:49.180]  What?
[01:39:49.180 --> 01:39:50.180]  It doesn't?
[01:39:50.180 --> 01:39:51.180]  Oh, okay.
[01:39:51.180 --> 01:40:00.180]  In the first part of the show, I talked about a lawsuit I filed against all the highest judges in Texas.
[01:40:00.180 --> 01:40:05.180]  And they're all filing responses, and I'm beating them up on the responses.
[01:40:05.180 --> 01:40:13.180]  This is so much fun, you won't believe it.
[01:40:13.180 --> 01:40:18.180]  The best fight to have is the one you picked.
[01:40:18.180 --> 01:40:24.180]  You go sue them or get your granddaughter to sue them, because you don't have standing.
[01:40:24.180 --> 01:40:27.180]  And then everybody has to answer to her.
[01:40:27.180 --> 01:40:35.180]  You beat them up a while and then offer to mediate, make me a deal, guys.
[01:40:35.180 --> 01:40:38.180]  Okay, all right.
[01:40:38.180 --> 01:40:42.180]  So look at how you can raise a claim against the people who stole the camper.
[01:40:42.180 --> 01:40:45.180]  Can I ask you about a trust and a trustee?
[01:40:45.180 --> 01:40:46.180]  Say that again.
[01:40:46.180 --> 01:40:50.180]  Or do I just leave now?
[01:40:50.180 --> 01:40:52.180]  Wait, I missed that last part.
[01:40:52.180 --> 01:40:57.180]  I said, can I ask you about a trust and a trustee?
[01:40:57.180 --> 01:40:59.180]  Yes, quickly.
[01:40:59.180 --> 01:41:02.180]  Okay, all right.
[01:41:02.180 --> 01:41:10.180]  The trustee of the...
[01:41:10.180 --> 01:41:14.180]  Wait a minute, move your mouth a little ways away from the microphone.
[01:41:14.180 --> 01:41:18.180]  We're getting some pretty serious distortion.
[01:41:18.180 --> 01:41:20.180]  I am very, very close to it.
[01:41:20.180 --> 01:41:22.180]  I guess it's where I'm at.
[01:41:22.180 --> 01:41:24.180]  I can call you tomorrow night.
[01:41:24.180 --> 01:41:26.180]  How about if I do that?
[01:41:26.180 --> 01:41:27.180]  That would be better.
[01:41:27.180 --> 01:41:29.180]  You just have four hours.
[01:41:29.180 --> 01:41:32.180]  That way I'll give other people a chance to talk, okay?
[01:41:32.180 --> 01:41:34.180]  Okay, thank you, Vivian.
[01:41:34.180 --> 01:41:35.180]  Oh, thank you, guys.
[01:41:35.180 --> 01:41:37.180]  Bye.
[01:41:37.180 --> 01:41:41.180]  Okay, now we're going to go to Mike in Tennessee.
[01:41:41.180 --> 01:41:44.180]  Hello, Mike.
[01:41:44.180 --> 01:41:45.180]  Hey there.
[01:41:45.180 --> 01:41:47.180]  How y'all doing there?
[01:41:47.180 --> 01:41:48.180]  Doing pretty good.
[01:41:48.180 --> 01:41:52.180]  What do you have for us today?
[01:41:52.180 --> 01:41:59.180]  Well, I was seeing if y'all had looked into them land patents,
[01:41:59.180 --> 01:42:03.180]  like every homeowner out there in the country.
[01:42:03.180 --> 01:42:06.180]  No, I did not look into the land patents.
[01:42:06.180 --> 01:42:14.180]  Did you hear the first part of the show?
[01:42:14.180 --> 01:42:17.180]  Are you still there?
[01:42:17.180 --> 01:42:19.180]  Hello?
[01:42:19.180 --> 01:42:20.180]  Mike, did we lose you?
[01:42:20.180 --> 01:42:23.180]  Yeah, I'm still here.
[01:42:23.180 --> 01:42:28.180]  Okay, did you hear the first part of the show?
[01:42:28.180 --> 01:42:30.180]  What was it about?
[01:42:30.180 --> 01:42:36.180]  It was about a $500 million lawsuit I filed against all the highest judges in Texas.
[01:42:36.180 --> 01:42:48.180]  And I had, I think, 17 Rule 12B motions to dismiss, to respond to by tomorrow.
[01:42:48.180 --> 01:42:51.180]  I've really been busy.
[01:42:51.180 --> 01:42:54.180]  I was not even thinking about land patents.
[01:42:54.180 --> 01:43:03.180]  I have spent a lot of time with land patents, and I'm not as impressed with them as a lot of people are.
[01:43:03.180 --> 01:43:12.180]  They get you out of paying certain taxes after one incredible fight with the county assessor.
[01:43:12.180 --> 01:43:23.180]  Even if you win, then you lose a lot of services that you'd have available to you that you'll have to contract for separately.
[01:43:23.180 --> 01:43:28.180]  So even when you do win it, I'm not sure how much you win.
[01:43:28.180 --> 01:43:32.180]  So it's not an issue that I've taken on very seriously.
[01:43:32.180 --> 01:43:37.180]  We've had it brought up a number of times over the years.
[01:43:37.180 --> 01:43:47.180]  And it's easier to do it in Texas than anywhere else, because we have our own patent office, our own land office in Texas.
[01:43:47.180 --> 01:43:48.180]  But no, I haven't.
[01:43:48.180 --> 01:43:50.180]  We're back into the land patent.
[01:43:50.180 --> 01:43:51.180]  Hang on.
[01:43:51.180 --> 01:44:00.180]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.180 --> 01:44:01.180]  Dang cookies.
[01:44:01.180 --> 01:44:03.180]  Cookies? Me love cookies.
[01:44:03.180 --> 01:44:06.180]  Oh, hi, Cookie Muncher. No, these are yucky cookies.
[01:44:06.180 --> 01:44:09.180]  Cookies? Yucky? No, no bad cookies.
[01:44:09.180 --> 01:44:12.180]  You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies.
[01:44:12.180 --> 01:44:13.180]  No can eat?
[01:44:13.180 --> 01:44:16.180]  No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[01:44:16.180 --> 01:44:17.180]  These have apples.
[01:44:17.180 --> 01:44:20.180]  Really? Oh, that's an actual apple.
[01:44:20.180 --> 01:44:23.180]  Yummy apple.
[01:44:23.180 --> 01:44:26.180]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[01:44:26.180 --> 01:44:32.180]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[01:44:32.180 --> 01:44:34.180]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[01:44:34.180 --> 01:44:41.180]  Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side, bookmark the link,
[01:44:41.180 --> 01:44:46.180]  and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[01:44:46.180 --> 01:44:48.180]  New cookies? For me?
[01:44:48.180 --> 01:44:50.180]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[01:44:50.180 --> 01:44:57.180]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[01:44:57.180 --> 01:44:58.180]  C is for cookie.
[01:44:58.180 --> 01:45:00.180]  C is for classified.
[01:45:00.180 --> 01:45:03.180]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.180 --> 01:45:14.180]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.180 --> 01:45:18.180]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.180 --> 01:45:22.180]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.180 --> 01:45:27.180]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.180 --> 01:45:33.180]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.180 --> 01:45:42.180]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.180 --> 01:45:51.180]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.180 --> 01:46:13.180]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.180 --> 01:46:26.180]  Some things in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:26.180 --> 01:46:30.180]  Some things I realize fully.
[01:46:30.180 --> 01:46:35.180]  Somebody's on a police, a policeman.
[01:46:35.180 --> 01:46:39.180]  Somebody's on a police, a police.
[01:46:39.180 --> 01:46:42.180]  There's always a room at the top of the hill.
[01:46:42.180 --> 01:46:44.180]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:44.180 --> 01:46:48.180]  We're at the Kelton Brat Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and I didn't mean to raid on your parade.
[01:46:48.180 --> 01:46:52.180]  Tell us about land patents.
[01:46:52.180 --> 01:47:11.180]  Well, you shouldn't be so submissive to an agency that doesn't have any statutory authority to assess thousands of dollars from you every year just for the recording and what they call real estate property taxes.
[01:47:11.180 --> 01:47:36.180]  This is not going to be an easy fight, but your listeners who own homes throughout the country, including you, Mr. Fountain, and others, send them an affidavit of demand respectfully, ask them their authority, and let them cite to you their fraud that they're putting on the people.
[01:47:36.180 --> 01:47:41.180]  Okay, what duty do they have to respond?
[01:47:41.180 --> 01:47:46.180]  They have to respond to duty because they're defrauding you out of thousands of dollars every year.
[01:47:46.180 --> 01:47:51.180]  Well, how does that give them a duty to respond?
[01:47:51.180 --> 01:48:04.180]  It seems like you, surprisingly, are submissive and give in to the oppression of these people defrauding you of your property on the land.
[01:48:04.180 --> 01:48:07.180]  It's not real estate. They use that word real estate.
[01:48:07.180 --> 01:48:09.180]  Your property is on the land.
[01:48:09.180 --> 01:48:15.180]  You don't get caught up in that real estate game, because that's the game they play.
[01:48:15.180 --> 01:48:24.180]  Okay, I get frustrated with these kinds of dispersions that tend to lead us off.
[01:48:24.180 --> 01:48:30.180]  Real estate only goes to real property.
[01:48:30.180 --> 01:48:34.180]  And real property is the land.
[01:48:34.180 --> 01:48:40.180]  You're making a distinction, as far as I can tell, without a difference.
[01:48:40.180 --> 01:48:43.180]  Your property is on the land.
[01:48:43.180 --> 01:48:47.180]  How is that different than real property?
[01:48:47.180 --> 01:48:51.180]  Your property is on the land. That's how it's different.
[01:48:51.180 --> 01:49:01.180]  Saying it again doesn't make any sense if real property is the land itself.
[01:49:01.180 --> 01:49:08.180]  Another homeowner is paying thousands of dollars every year. Does that make any sense? Think about it.
[01:49:08.180 --> 01:49:12.180]  Okay, now you're changing topics again. This is what the Patriot guys do.
[01:49:12.180 --> 01:49:15.180]  I'm trying to get good, specific information.
[01:49:15.180 --> 01:49:23.180]  There's nothing about no Patriot. There's nothing about no Patriot. If anybody with common sense should know...
[01:49:23.180 --> 01:49:34.180]  He's looking for a way. He wants you to find a legitimate way for him to back up what he knows in his gut.
[01:49:34.180 --> 01:49:38.180]  He knows in his gut that it's not right to be paying property taxes.
[01:49:38.180 --> 01:49:48.180]  And I think he wants you to tell him how to navigate that and end up with some lawful position to do that.
[01:49:48.180 --> 01:49:54.180]  And Brett, you know, I gave him the information two weeks ago, who to call.
[01:49:54.180 --> 01:49:55.180]  Ah, okay.
[01:49:55.180 --> 01:50:06.180]  And he has the information. And also, he should let the listeners know there's two books they can order and get the books from the land patent expert.
[01:50:06.180 --> 01:50:14.180]  There's thousands of books where people put theories out there. Theories get people in trouble.
[01:50:14.180 --> 01:50:18.180]  People try to follow theories. They end up in a lot of trouble. I mean, it hurts people.
[01:50:18.180 --> 01:50:26.180]  I personally, I'm nobody, and I get calls from people trying to get help after they followed some theory.
[01:50:26.180 --> 01:50:31.180]  And the people that wrote the books are nowhere to be found. They won't come and help get them out of jail.
[01:50:31.180 --> 01:50:39.180]  So I'm reluctant to hear about people's theories because there's so many of them.
[01:50:39.180 --> 01:50:47.180]  But if you've got some personal experience where you've been through a certain process and you figured out a way that, hey, I didn't have to sue them.
[01:50:47.180 --> 01:50:53.180]  All I had to do was go through this Bureau of Land Management and file this certain form or that.
[01:50:53.180 --> 01:51:01.180]  That's worth hearing something about because it's your personal experience and you know that you ended up getting some traction that way.
[01:51:01.180 --> 01:51:09.180]  We all know that property taxes are wrong because you have a right to own property and nobody can tax a right.
[01:51:09.180 --> 01:51:17.180]  We all get that. We get that it's broken right now and that it's inappropriate for these, you know, punks to be running around,
[01:51:17.180 --> 01:51:23.180]  calling themselves assessors and collectors and act like they're in charge of your property.
[01:51:23.180 --> 01:51:27.180]  They don't have any ownership interest and they have no business talking to you about your property.
[01:51:27.180 --> 01:51:38.180]  It's just your property. But we get that. And there are different ways to handle that.
[01:51:38.180 --> 01:51:47.180]  You're talking about this land patent and yeah, that's one possibility. Lots of people talked about that.
[01:51:47.180 --> 01:51:57.180]  If you've got some personal experience with that, I bet you that would be pretty valuable and helpful for a lot of people.
[01:51:57.180 --> 01:52:08.180]  And that's what I'm telling you. You search the land patent and you get the warranty deed out to the county assessor issuing you a warranty deed, which is not the true deed.
[01:52:08.180 --> 01:52:19.180]  The elodio title is the true deed. And you get it out from the county assessor because who you're paying your taxes to is the county assessor.
[01:52:19.180 --> 01:52:27.180]  The recordation of that property is to the county assessor every year, thousands and thousands of dollars every year in the country.
[01:52:27.180 --> 01:52:34.180]  Now, what about you? What about you, Mike? You send them an affidavit of demand.
[01:52:34.180 --> 01:52:41.180]  No, not what I should do, but what have you done? You know, that's what you send them.
[01:52:41.180 --> 01:52:51.180]  I'm not asking about what people in general ought to do. I'm asking, is that something that you have done? Is this a path that you have walked?
[01:52:51.180 --> 01:53:04.180]  The information you would go, I gave to Randy. You can look him up and Google him. His name is Mr. Ron Gibson. He's a land patent rights expert.
[01:53:04.180 --> 01:53:14.180]  Yeah, I looked him up and I listened to one of his presentations and he really sounded knowledgeable.
[01:53:14.180 --> 01:53:18.180]  He is very knowledgeable. Very knowledgeable, he is.
[01:53:18.180 --> 01:53:30.180]  Yeah, and I have that information. If anybody's interested in the land patent issue, send me an email. I will forward it to you.
[01:53:30.180 --> 01:53:42.180]  I'm real open to that, but I'm more open to talking to people who've actually done this because I've had people call into this show who had folks come to them and say,
[01:53:42.180 --> 01:53:50.180]  oh, property taxes are wrong. You don't have to pay them. And they start a fight with the tax assessor and they wind up losing their property.
[01:53:50.180 --> 01:53:58.180]  One guy was in his 70s. Exactly. He wound up losing his property. He was out on the street. He was homeless in his 70s.
[01:53:58.180 --> 01:54:04.180]  And he might have been right and they were wrong, but he lost his property.
[01:54:04.180 --> 01:54:18.180]  Can I finish? Can I finish? Hold on. I am Mr. Gibson. We're not patriots. Mr. Gibson is a land patent rights expert and he has gone down the road that you keep asking me.
[01:54:18.180 --> 01:54:32.180]  You contact him. He's the expert. He's gone down that road and he knows how to defeat them in the frequency of their constructive fraud.
[01:54:32.180 --> 01:54:51.180]  And another thing is, hold on, let me finish. This thing falls under RICO. This is under RICO. It's a racketeering influenced criminal organization. And it's no different than what Eddie was trying to tell you on June 5th, Randy,
[01:54:51.180 --> 01:55:04.180]  about how the municipal courts are doing the same RICO to every citizen out there when they have no subject matter jurisdiction to hear class C misdemeanor traffic cases.
[01:55:04.180 --> 01:55:26.180]  We'll sue them. If this is your issue, put together a suit and take them on. They've been doing that for years. They've been doing that for years. The fraud, perpetrating the fraud on the people, they have no business hearing any traffic, class C misdemeanor traffic cases.
[01:55:26.180 --> 01:55:41.180]  Are you saying you've been suing them for years? Is that what you're saying? Randy clearly had told you that on June 5th, Randy, and he clearly told you and cited the law, the Texas law about that.
[01:55:41.180 --> 01:55:56.180]  They have no class C misdemeanor traffic cases. And they've been doing that down there for years. Okay, hold on. You're being imprecise. You're using a lot of pronouns.
[01:55:56.180 --> 01:56:16.180]  When you say they don't have jurisdiction, I'm speaking to sheriff's department and municipal police officers. That's who they refers to. It doesn't refer to Department of Public Safety officers.
[01:56:16.180 --> 01:56:26.180]  Who said anything about Department of Safety or sheriffs? I said the municipal courts. You said they. That was my issue. You're being imprecise, so I don't know what you're talking about.
[01:56:26.180 --> 01:56:47.180]  Traffic cases. Class C traffic city traffic cases, I said. I didn't say anything about sheriffs or deputies. That was the problem. Municipal courts. You're not listening. You don't let me finish? You're not listening. No, I'm not going to let you finish.
[01:56:47.180 --> 01:57:01.180]  I'm not going to let you bully me on my own show. Are you kidding me? You're not listening. You're not listening. This is my show. This ain't your show. I ask you a question. You ought to keep just stating the same stuff over and over.
[01:57:01.180 --> 01:57:08.180]  I'm telling you, having a problem with what you're saying. And you want to say it louder and think like it makes any difference.
[01:57:08.180 --> 01:57:21.180]  You say they don't have jurisdiction. You're not listening, though. Did I miss that? Did you say they didn't have jurisdiction? No, he actually didn't say who his they was.
[01:57:21.180 --> 01:57:32.180]  And now that you're trying to highlight for him that it's important that he specify who they means, he's arguing about that you're not letting him finish.
[01:57:32.180 --> 01:57:46.180]  Sometimes I gotta say it. I said the municipal court does not have subject matter jurisdiction on Class C misdemeanor traffic cases. The same thing Eddie Craig was telling you on June 5th.
[01:57:46.180 --> 01:57:52.180]  What? You don't understand? I'm saying it in plain English. Quit interrupting me.
[01:57:52.180 --> 01:58:05.180]  Yes, it's English, but it's not so plain because it's got a lot of missing places in there. And I was trying to fill in those empty spaces. Communication is not what you say.
[01:58:05.180 --> 01:58:18.180]  Communication is the result you get. So if you're making these sounds and the person on the other end is not able to interpret those sounds, you don't think you blame the guy on the other end.
[01:58:18.180 --> 01:58:31.180]  I was asking for clarification. We won't do this again. I don't argue on my own show.
[01:58:31.180 --> 01:58:50.180]  Okay, we are out of time. We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour info marathon and make sure you check out Eddie on Monday night. If you really like to be hollered at, Eddie's the right one. Thank you for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.180 --> 01:59:08.180]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.180 --> 01:59:30.180]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.180 --> 01:59:52.180]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.180 --> 02:00:00.180]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.