ROL_2023-06-01_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.800]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.800 --> 00:09.480]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.480 --> 00:10.920]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.920 --> 00:14.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.880 --> 00:17.100]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:17.100 --> 00:18.680]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.680 --> 00:22.300]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.300 --> 00:27.080]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[00:27.080 --> 00:28.520]  So protect your rights.
[00:28.520 --> 00:32.240]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.240 --> 00:33.240]  Privacy.
[00:33.240 --> 00:34.840]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.840 --> 00:39.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:39.120 --> 00:42.660]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.660 --> 00:45.960]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.960 --> 00:50.000]  Most of us know that taking the Fifth means you're choosing to remain silent about a criminal
[00:50.000 --> 00:51.000]  matter.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.800]  It's a good way to remember that the Fifth Amendment spells out what can and can't happen
[00:54.800 --> 00:57.360]  to you when you're accused of a criminal offense.
[00:57.360 --> 01:01.600]  The Fifth guarantees due process, prohibits trying someone more than once for the same
[01:01.600 --> 01:04.180]  crime, and lets you keep your mouth shut.
[01:04.180 --> 01:09.280]  The Founding Fathers inserted these constitutional provisions to protect citizens from torture.
[01:09.280 --> 01:13.760]  Back in the day, governments often used painful methods to extract confessions.
[01:13.760 --> 01:17.680]  The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the government from taking your house and land without paying
[01:17.680 --> 01:18.680]  you for it.
[01:18.680 --> 01:20.040]  That used to happen a lot, too.
[01:20.040 --> 01:21.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:21.840 --> 01:31.760]  For news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.760 --> 01:35.160]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:35.160 --> 01:39.200]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:39.200 --> 01:40.680]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:40.680 --> 01:44.540]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:44.540 --> 01:47.560]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:47.560 --> 01:49.140]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:49.140 --> 01:52.740]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:52.740 --> 01:57.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:57.520 --> 02:02.600]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:02.600 --> 02:05.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:05.280 --> 02:09.560]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:09.560 --> 02:13.120]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.120 --> 02:16.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:16.040 --> 02:18.840]  The number 666 reminds me of evil.
[02:18.840 --> 02:23.520]  I also associate it with the sick feeling one might get when falsely accused of a heinous
[02:23.520 --> 02:27.840]  crime, or when thinking about sickos who actually do commit acts of murder and mayhem.
[02:27.840 --> 02:33.640]  Either way, the number 666 can help you remember that the Sixth Amendment deals with the constitutionally
[02:33.640 --> 02:36.920]  guaranteed rights Americans have in a criminal trial.
[02:36.920 --> 02:41.200]  Those include the right to a speedy public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the
[02:41.200 --> 02:45.200]  right to full information about the charges, the right to an attorney, and the right to
[02:45.200 --> 02:47.840]  confront any witnesses face to face.
[02:47.840 --> 02:51.520]  666, sick, sickos, and the Sixth Amendment.
[02:51.520 --> 02:52.520]  Get it?
[02:52.520 --> 02:53.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:53.720 --> 03:22.280]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:54.720 --> 04:08.560]  on this the first day of June 2023, this Thursday the first day of June 2023.
[04:08.560 --> 04:11.800]  And I'm going to start out, I've got the phone lines on.
[04:11.800 --> 04:22.320]  So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call, a call in number 512-646-1984.
[04:22.320 --> 04:24.280]  And I've been working on my questionnaires.
[04:24.280 --> 04:29.880]  I've only got a million five to work on.
[04:29.880 --> 04:31.680]  That shouldn't take too long.
[04:31.680 --> 04:33.160]  Only a million five.
[04:33.160 --> 04:41.080]  Yes, been all week working on the underlying HTML code.
[04:41.080 --> 04:48.760]  But I forgot I had the programmer rework the system so it no longer uses the HTML code.
[04:48.760 --> 04:53.880]  Oh, that was really annoying.
[04:53.880 --> 05:00.600]  And I got through two or three really long questionnaires and I found I had some errors
[05:00.600 --> 05:03.760]  in the code.
[05:03.760 --> 05:09.720]  And so I loaded one up and ran it to make sure it worked and it worked.
[05:09.720 --> 05:14.520]  And I looked in the code and the code was all messed up.
[05:14.520 --> 05:19.360]  That's when I remembered I had even changed the program so it doesn't use the code anymore.
[05:19.360 --> 05:23.440]  Oh, that was not good.
[05:23.440 --> 05:27.120]  All that time working on it and I forgot.
[05:27.120 --> 05:35.880]  But they'll go quickly now with this new process.
[05:35.880 --> 05:42.320]  And I'm hoping that within two weeks I'll have a working sample up.
[05:42.320 --> 05:46.680]  I don't have all of the penal code mapped out yet.
[05:46.680 --> 05:49.720]  I've only got about half of it.
[05:49.720 --> 05:54.960]  But I do have traffic and due process.
[05:54.960 --> 05:56.200]  And that is by far the biggest.
[05:56.200 --> 06:03.160]  The penal codes are about half a dozen questions each so they should go pretty quick.
[06:03.160 --> 06:14.040]  And which reminds me, you know, last time we talked about the asset forfeiture scam
[06:14.040 --> 06:22.600]  going on in Victoria County and I suspect something similar is going on everywhere.
[06:22.600 --> 06:27.320]  Maybe not quite as sinister as there.
[06:27.320 --> 06:32.720]  But Brett, did you hear about the recent case of a woman in Kenny?
[06:32.720 --> 06:36.020]  And I had talked to this woman when this stuff happened to her.
[06:36.020 --> 06:40.080]  She called into the show and we talked to her.
[06:40.080 --> 06:49.520]  And the police, someone barricaded their self in one of a house that she was renting.
[06:49.520 --> 06:52.640]  And the police went in and tore it all to pieces.
[06:52.640 --> 06:57.080]  And then she went to the city to get it repaired and the city told her to go scratch.
[06:57.080 --> 07:03.800]  But the police were just doing their job and they have immunity.
[07:03.800 --> 07:08.080]  And this has been going on for a long time in Texas and all over the country.
[07:08.080 --> 07:13.640]  Yeah, they just ransack whatever they want to destroy everything and then oops, that's
[07:13.640 --> 07:14.640]  your problem.
[07:14.640 --> 07:15.640]  Yeah.
[07:15.640 --> 07:27.040]  And so this lawyer who was actually thinking, I know thinking and lawyer in the same sentence
[07:27.040 --> 07:38.200]  tends to be an oxymoron, but on occasion he took them on for imminent domain.
[07:38.200 --> 07:49.360]  Imminent domain in the city came in and took her property for a city purpose.
[07:49.360 --> 07:55.700]  And instead of going after the officers, the officers were there at the behest of the city.
[07:55.700 --> 08:03.840]  So this was sued as an improper taking.
[08:03.840 --> 08:09.600]  The Fifth Circuit agreed to it and this article I read said that everybody else is telling
[08:09.600 --> 08:14.080]  them don't appeal, don't appeal.
[08:14.080 --> 08:18.080]  Because it's only the Fifth Circuit now.
[08:18.080 --> 08:24.960]  If you appeal it and the Supreme agrees, then it screws everybody.
[08:24.960 --> 08:36.160]  But I was looking at this and we talked about Dr. Joe's case last week about the asset forfeiture.
[08:36.160 --> 08:39.160]  That's the same thing.
[08:39.160 --> 08:45.120]  That's an improper taking by the county.
[08:45.120 --> 08:52.640]  So I was looking at suing to get back Dr. Joe's airplane and they could do that under
[08:52.640 --> 08:54.900]  improper taking.
[08:54.900 --> 09:04.720]  He took his airplane and then they said he could have it back, but he was in a physical
[09:04.720 --> 09:11.200]  state where he couldn't get it and they abandoned it on an airport and someone stole it.
[09:11.200 --> 09:17.480]  So we're holding them responsible for stealing the airplanes.
[09:17.480 --> 09:19.680]  We don't care what happened to it.
[09:19.680 --> 09:26.800]  You were responsible for it and you didn't give it back so it was improper taking.
[09:26.800 --> 09:28.040]  They said, well, we released it.
[09:28.040 --> 09:29.880]  Yeah, but you didn't give it back to him.
[09:29.880 --> 09:32.360]  You took it away from him.
[09:32.360 --> 09:33.840]  You didn't give it back to him.
[09:33.840 --> 09:34.840]  Released?
[09:34.840 --> 09:35.840]  What good does that do?
[09:35.840 --> 09:42.360]  Yeah, told him to go find it, but by then it had been stolen.
[09:42.360 --> 09:50.440]  So we'll call that an improper taking and that'll give us a shot at getting the city
[09:50.440 --> 09:55.520]  to write us a deal, at least on the airplane and his assets.
[09:55.520 --> 10:02.720]  He had over $100,000 worth of assets, the airplane and gold and silver and other stuff.
[10:02.720 --> 10:07.880]  He didn't get any of it back.
[10:07.880 --> 10:12.640]  So we'll sue for all of that under the improper taking.
[10:12.640 --> 10:14.680]  This is going to be great.
[10:14.680 --> 10:20.560]  Yeah, it's a good angle to pick for that because otherwise they're looking at, hey, you caused
[10:20.560 --> 10:23.480]  certain damage and then they say, oh, but we have governmental immunity.
[10:23.480 --> 10:25.960]  We were just doing our job.
[10:25.960 --> 10:34.160]  And he's taking this other angle of imminent domain and I think that's really smart.
[10:34.160 --> 10:36.280]  But it worked.
[10:36.280 --> 10:45.760]  I guess odd how that's been sitting there for 200 years and it just never occurred to
[10:45.760 --> 10:46.760]  anyone.
[10:46.760 --> 10:47.760]  And what did she get?
[10:47.760 --> 10:53.280]  Like it was $60,000 that the city had to pay to her?
[10:53.280 --> 10:56.240]  Something like that, yeah.
[10:56.240 --> 11:00.120]  When I was looking at, she asked for 70, but I didn't see what they actually paid.
[11:00.120 --> 11:04.080]  It wasn't in the article I was reading.
[11:04.080 --> 11:15.160]  But she did get, she did win the case and set a precedent that every other state's terrified
[11:15.160 --> 11:19.560]  they're going to get it set in their state and they're going to get them the same suits
[11:19.560 --> 11:20.920]  in their states anyway.
[11:20.920 --> 11:22.560]  Oh, you know it.
[11:22.560 --> 11:23.560]  Yeah.
[11:23.560 --> 11:28.720]  They kicked this door open.
[11:28.720 --> 11:29.720]  So that's-
[11:29.720 --> 11:32.720]  They knocked the fence down.
[11:32.720 --> 11:33.720]  Yeah.
[11:33.720 --> 11:36.280]  So I was really, really pleased to hear that.
[11:36.280 --> 11:40.400]  So things are going pretty good here.
[11:40.400 --> 11:49.520]  The questionnaire is shaping up it could change the way the courts do things.
[11:49.520 --> 11:57.940]  If I can convince the local county court, county commissioner's court, that this will
[11:57.940 --> 12:06.360]  save them in a court appointed council costs and get them to pressure the sheriff to make
[12:06.360 --> 12:07.360]  this available to everybody.
[12:07.360 --> 12:12.760]  And if I get the county judge to do it, they really won't have an option because the judge
[12:12.760 --> 12:19.080]  can do it himself when they come to his court and ask for court appointed council, as this
[12:19.080 --> 12:21.120]  always has to go through a court.
[12:21.120 --> 12:25.440]  Now the district court may be a little harder.
[12:25.440 --> 12:35.760]  The district judge hates me, probably sued him a couple of times and only filed a small
[12:35.760 --> 12:40.520]  handful of criminal complaints against him.
[12:40.520 --> 12:48.400]  But maybe I can win him over with my great personality, my big smile.
[12:48.400 --> 12:50.820]  Yeah, maybe.
[12:50.820 --> 12:51.820]  Maybe not.
[12:51.820 --> 12:55.920]  But if I get the county, that'll be enough.
[12:55.920 --> 13:01.760]  Once I get the county court doing this, then they'll probably, if it works out for them,
[13:01.760 --> 13:08.720]  the lawyers in the county will pressure the district judge to do it because they'll be
[13:08.720 --> 13:12.320]  getting solicitations for representation.
[13:12.320 --> 13:16.360]  They'd be getting clients contacting them.
[13:16.360 --> 13:21.800]  Yeah, that's actually, that'd work out well for them.
[13:21.800 --> 13:26.080]  I'm hoping it does.
[13:26.080 --> 13:34.360]  If it does, then the only thing I need to get this thing financed is to be able to show
[13:34.360 --> 13:37.360]  that people will pay for it.
[13:37.360 --> 13:45.000]  So if I get it going in Wise County, I'll be sending these to lawyers in Tarrant and
[13:45.000 --> 13:52.360]  Dallas County as well, they'll begin to see this and it's very likely to spread relatively
[13:52.360 --> 13:53.360]  quickly.
[13:53.360 --> 13:58.640]  Once I have the questionnaire up and working, I could put it all over the state of Texas
[13:58.640 --> 14:01.960]  in a heartbeat.
[14:01.960 --> 14:12.920]  So then I get the lawyers to pay me so much a month to be on my lists.
[14:12.920 --> 14:18.240]  That gives me considerable passive income.
[14:18.240 --> 14:19.240]  Very cool.
[14:19.240 --> 14:25.840]  Then I won't know you guys when I get to feel wealthy rich.
[14:25.840 --> 14:28.200]  You're going to forget all of us little people.
[14:28.200 --> 14:33.760]  Red who?
[14:33.760 --> 14:37.520]  So what have you been up to lately?
[14:37.520 --> 14:40.120]  Well I have a lesson in what not to do.
[14:40.120 --> 14:43.920]  Do you like to hear about that?
[14:43.920 --> 14:47.880]  Yes I would.
[14:47.880 --> 14:49.320]  So here's the thing.
[14:49.320 --> 14:57.600]  Number one, don't sit on a document that you need to write and just think, oh, I'll
[14:57.600 --> 15:04.120]  be able to do that and you keep helping everybody else with their urgent, urgent issues.
[15:04.120 --> 15:07.460]  So that's number one.
[15:07.460 --> 15:16.160]  Number two, don't write the document, stayed up late three nights in a row, just burning
[15:16.160 --> 15:21.160]  the midnight oil, working through the wee hours and I got this document where I think
[15:21.160 --> 15:22.160]  it's ready.
[15:22.160 --> 15:25.640]  And then I'm like, how many days do I have?
[15:25.640 --> 15:29.400]  I think I have, it's either, I don't know, I need to go look at that.
[15:29.400 --> 15:34.120]  If it was 28, then that was yesterday, but if it's 30, I still have until tomorrow.
[15:34.120 --> 15:35.120]  So that'd be good.
[15:35.120 --> 15:36.120]  I went and looked again.
[15:36.120 --> 15:41.640]  Okay, so it says I have 40 days, but right underneath the 40 days, it tells all these
[15:41.640 --> 15:45.360]  details of what the document needs to contain.
[15:45.360 --> 15:50.440]  This is my federal appellate brief and it's going from the federal district court to the
[15:50.440 --> 15:52.920]  federal circuit court.
[15:52.920 --> 15:59.720]  And so I'm finding out at the tail end of my 40 days, I've got now another week now,
[15:59.720 --> 16:03.040]  and I'm finding out at the tail end of it that I'm supposed to write all these, I need
[16:03.040 --> 16:08.680]  to include pieces of all the documents that I'm trying to reference in there.
[16:08.680 --> 16:15.200]  I need to hyperlink everything and I need to do all these details with the document
[16:15.200 --> 16:19.680]  that's a pain.
[16:19.680 --> 16:32.280]  I have a template for an appellate brief with the table of contents and table of authorities.
[16:32.280 --> 16:37.200]  Let's pick this up on the other side.
[16:37.200 --> 16:41.640]  It's got to be, the numbering, the hardest thing for me was the numbering, because the
[16:41.640 --> 16:42.640]  first...
[16:42.640 --> 16:46.840]  Footnotes and hyperlink back and forth to the footnotes and yeah.
[16:46.840 --> 16:49.840]  I didn't use any footnotes at all.
[16:49.840 --> 16:54.520]  Where I'd put a footnote, I'd put in a quote, heck with that footnote crap, that's not too
[16:54.520 --> 16:55.520]  complicated.
[16:55.520 --> 17:00.240]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back.
[17:00.240 --> 17:06.280]  Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.280 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:16.600]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:16.600 --> 17:23.040]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[17:23.040 --> 17:25.320]  provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.320 --> 17:30.320]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.320 --> 17:31.320]  we reject.
[17:31.320 --> 17:36.560]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.560 --> 17:39.400]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.400 --> 17:45.680]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:45.680 --> 17:47.320]  quality radio.
[17:47.320 --> 17:51.640]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.640 --> 17:56.880]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:56.880 --> 17:58.840]  increase your income.
[17:58.840 --> 18:01.000]  Order now.
[18:01.000 --> 18:05.360]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[18:05.360 --> 18:06.360]  Word?
[18:06.360 --> 18:11.520]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[18:11.520 --> 18:17.920]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[18:17.920 --> 18:22.440]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[18:22.440 --> 18:24.720]  dividing the word of truth.
[18:24.720 --> 18:28.480]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[18:28.480 --> 18:32.160]  verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[18:32.160 --> 18:36.800]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[18:36.800 --> 18:39.160]  and Christian character development.
[18:39.160 --> 18:43.680]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:43.680 --> 18:48.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.000 --> 18:50.280]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[18:50.280 --> 18:56.920]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[18:56.920 --> 19:00.920]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[19:00.920 --> 19:15.240]  Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:15.240 --> 19:32.480]  Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:32.480 --> 19:52.840]  Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:52.840 --> 20:13.200]  Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[20:13.200 --> 20:33.280]  Okay, we are back.
[20:33.280 --> 20:38.200]  This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and we're just talking
[20:38.200 --> 20:43.560]  about a lesson in what not to do.
[20:43.560 --> 20:45.640]  Don't do like what I did.
[20:45.640 --> 20:51.160]  I helped everybody with their issues, their urgent issues, and I didn't look, and I knew
[20:51.160 --> 20:57.200]  I had a document I need to go from the Federal District Court and appeal to the Federal Circuit
[20:57.200 --> 21:03.600]  Court, but I figured these people have real urgent issues.
[21:03.600 --> 21:06.720]  I mean, I'm not facing any jail time.
[21:06.720 --> 21:13.960]  I'm not facing immediate extradition, imminent, all kinds of problems of families being ripped
[21:13.960 --> 21:19.000]  apart and everything, and if there's anything I can do, my document keeps getting later
[21:19.000 --> 21:20.000]  and later.
[21:20.000 --> 21:25.800]  Well, that's one problem, but the other problem is I didn't look at the requirements early
[21:25.800 --> 21:26.800]  on.
[21:26.800 --> 21:31.840]  I did, but then I got distracted with other things, and I couldn't really remember what
[21:31.840 --> 21:34.320]  I had read about how many days.
[21:34.320 --> 21:41.000]  I think I have 21 or 30 days or something, I don't know, but then I also saw 40 days.
[21:41.000 --> 21:46.480]  Oh, I sure hope it wasn't that line about the 14, but I just kept doing other people's
[21:46.480 --> 21:54.920]  stuff, helping with their whatever was urgent, and so I go to look after I wrote my document,
[21:54.920 --> 22:01.160]  I go to look at the requirements, and I see that I do have 40 days, so that's good.
[22:01.160 --> 22:06.280]  I'm not going to be late, but I also have to include a whole bunch of stuff.
[22:06.280 --> 22:12.480]  They actually want all of the pleadings that were in the previous case if I'm going to
[22:12.480 --> 22:17.360]  refer to anything from district to circuit, so that's kind of a pain.
[22:17.360 --> 22:20.640]  I was giving them a hard time all along the way, so I've got a lot of paperwork that
[22:20.640 --> 22:24.480]  they're going to have to read if we're going to address all of the issues, right?
[22:24.480 --> 22:30.520]  So it's going to be a big deal, but yeah, don't do what I did and wait until the last
[22:30.520 --> 22:36.000]  minute on your own stuff, and then figure out what the requirements are.
[22:36.000 --> 22:42.160]  Look at the requirements first, see how much time you have to do it, and prioritize it
[22:42.160 --> 22:46.160]  so that you can get your own stuff done too.
[22:46.160 --> 22:51.560]  Anyway, that's my suggestion about what to not do.
[22:51.560 --> 22:52.560]  Don't do it like I did.
[22:52.560 --> 22:59.160]  I'm still going to get this in on time, but it would have been better all around if I
[22:59.160 --> 23:00.560]  had done mine first.
[23:00.560 --> 23:04.360]  All right, so we've got our phones are open.
[23:04.360 --> 23:05.760]  Our caller lines are ready.
[23:05.760 --> 23:10.760]  If you want to call in, it is 512-646-1984.
[23:10.760 --> 23:11.760]  512-646-1984.
[23:11.760 --> 23:21.000]  Randy, have you ever gotten yourself in a situation where you're working on somebody
[23:21.000 --> 23:26.720]  else's stuff and you don't get a chance to work on your own?
[23:26.720 --> 23:28.720]  Has that ever happened to you?
[23:28.720 --> 23:35.600]  I once had a sergeant on the Department of Public Safety smash me in the wall and knock
[23:35.600 --> 23:37.320]  my tooth out.
[23:37.320 --> 23:44.160]  I never got around to suing him because I was helping everybody else.
[23:44.160 --> 23:49.840]  I've had three or four suits of my own that I didn't get to because I was helping everybody
[23:49.840 --> 23:53.240]  else.
[23:53.240 --> 24:00.800]  And Deborah made a comment once in an email to someone that I took to heart.
[24:00.800 --> 24:08.440]  It said, your lack of preparation does not create an emergency for me.
[24:08.440 --> 24:15.400]  And I started paying more attention to that.
[24:15.400 --> 24:20.200]  Brett and I both, we get people coming to us, oh, they're going to throw me in jail
[24:20.200 --> 24:21.200]  tomorrow.
[24:21.200 --> 24:22.200]  What can I do?
[24:22.200 --> 24:23.200]  You've got to help me.
[24:23.200 --> 24:26.880]  And I say, no, I can't help you.
[24:26.880 --> 24:31.920]  If you came to me last week or last month, I might be able to help you.
[24:31.920 --> 24:37.640]  But you go to everybody else first and then when it's absolutely the last possible second
[24:37.640 --> 24:45.960]  you come to me and ask me to drop my life and dig you out of this hole you dug for yourself.
[24:45.960 --> 24:51.360]  Maybe I'm getting old and maybe I'm getting jaded.
[24:51.360 --> 24:58.680]  But I have, I still help people, but not like I used to.
[24:58.680 --> 25:07.440]  What I'm doing now is trying to get some things done that will give everybody new tools to
[25:07.440 --> 25:09.880]  work with.
[25:09.880 --> 25:22.440]  The suit I have before the federal court against Travis County is designed to get the court
[25:22.440 --> 25:30.640]  of criminal appeals judges to change the training of magistrates and police so it's in line
[25:30.640 --> 25:39.120]  with the black litter law and code of criminal procedure.
[25:39.120 --> 25:44.080]  If I get that done, then I've helped everybody.
[25:44.080 --> 25:47.840]  There's three things in there I'm going after.
[25:47.840 --> 25:58.400]  One of them is the 1617 issue where if you are not brought before a magistrate for an
[25:58.400 --> 26:04.920]  examining trial and there is no order showing or finding a probable cause in the record
[26:04.920 --> 26:13.160]  within 48 hours you have the statute says the accused shall be discharged.
[26:13.160 --> 26:19.000]  Now that dictates a judicial determination, but it's never been challenged like the Speedy
[26:19.000 --> 26:21.080]  Trial Act was.
[26:21.080 --> 26:25.000]  So that's still very much entrenched in black litter law.
[26:25.000 --> 26:29.960]  The second one is the Speedy Trial Act.
[26:29.960 --> 26:43.000]  I'm asking the courts to distinguish Barker Wingo as it applies to the state of Texas.
[26:43.000 --> 26:50.320]  Barker Wingo says that if you want a right to a Speedy Trial you have to demand it.
[26:50.320 --> 26:57.520]  And I'm saying I'm not going to challenge whether or not that's true in the Fed, but
[26:57.520 --> 27:01.440]  it certainly is not true in the state of Texas.
[27:01.440 --> 27:08.000]  State of Texas says nothing about, the Constitution doesn't say anything about you have a right
[27:08.000 --> 27:11.520]  to a Speedy Trial if you demand it.
[27:11.520 --> 27:14.200]  That's not what it says.
[27:14.200 --> 27:18.280]  It says public officials shall provide a Speedy Trial.
[27:18.280 --> 27:21.760]  Does not say may, might, or can if they want to.
[27:21.760 --> 27:25.920]  And all these public officials soar in their oath, they'd abide by the Constitution, they'd
[27:25.920 --> 27:28.040]  protect the Constitution.
[27:28.040 --> 27:32.080]  We can't protect the Constitution while breaching it.
[27:32.080 --> 27:40.160]  So they agreed to do all of these things the Constitution tells them to do.
[27:40.160 --> 27:42.520]  One of them is to provide a Speedy Trial.
[27:42.520 --> 27:45.560]  Doesn't say anything about whether we ask for it or not.
[27:45.560 --> 27:51.440]  Doesn't even say anything about whether we want one or not.
[27:51.440 --> 27:54.160]  They're required to provide it.
[27:54.160 --> 27:57.680]  And they're making all these laws to make adjudication easier.
[27:57.680 --> 28:04.280]  They're saying, well, you know, in court cases, things come up and it takes time.
[28:04.280 --> 28:07.560]  Your problem, not my problem.
[28:07.560 --> 28:09.520]  Get yourself busy.
[28:09.520 --> 28:11.640]  Get this done.
[28:11.640 --> 28:14.720]  The law is clear on what you're to do.
[28:14.720 --> 28:20.280]  Just because it's difficult, if this were easy, somebody else would be doing it.
[28:20.280 --> 28:21.960]  That's why you're in this position.
[28:21.960 --> 28:24.960]  Okay, that's two.
[28:24.960 --> 28:29.360]  Three is 15.09.
[28:29.360 --> 28:39.320]  In 15.09, if a magistrate is presented with a warrant, I'm sorry, if a magistrate is
[28:39.320 --> 28:48.120]  presented with a criminal affidavit, complete in accordance with 15.05, the magistrate shall
[28:48.120 --> 28:50.480]  issue a warrant forthwith.
[28:50.480 --> 28:52.840]  But part of that is hard to understand.
[28:52.840 --> 28:59.320]  Doesn't say anything about a determination of the sufficiency of the complaint.
[28:59.320 --> 29:02.960]  That has to be done later.
[29:02.960 --> 29:05.880]  He needs to issue the warrant forthwith.
[29:05.880 --> 29:07.480]  No discretion.
[29:07.480 --> 29:09.120]  That's the third thing.
[29:09.120 --> 29:12.600]  That's probably the most important.
[29:12.600 --> 29:19.500]  If we get that one, we will get all the rest.
[29:19.500 --> 29:27.900]  If I go down to observe a polling place, and I see someone do something that I have reason
[29:27.900 --> 29:34.960]  to believe is improper, I call the police, I file a complaint with the policeman.
[29:34.960 --> 29:40.840]  And the policeman is to give notice to some magistrate in accordance with 2.13 Code of
[29:40.840 --> 29:41.840]  Criminal Procedure.
[29:41.840 --> 29:47.360]  And if he gives notice in the form of my verified affidavit, the magistrate needs to issue a
[29:47.360 --> 29:48.360]  warrant forthwith.
[29:48.360 --> 29:52.680]  That person has to come before the court and explain himself.
[29:52.680 --> 29:54.880]  That'll change everything.
[29:54.880 --> 30:01.600]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Weave Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:01.600 --> 30:05.720]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:05.720 --> 30:10.440]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your
[30:10.440 --> 30:11.440]  secrets.
[30:11.440 --> 30:15.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details.
[30:15.640 --> 30:17.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.240 --> 30:20.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.840 --> 30:25.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:25.600 --> 30:30.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.760 --> 30:33.360]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.360 --> 30:37.660]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.660 --> 30:41.200]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.200 --> 30:44.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.880 --> 30:49.640]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:49.640 --> 30:50.920]  your personal information.
[30:50.920 --> 30:54.100]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.100 --> 30:55.520]  It's not an idle question.
[30:55.520 --> 31:00.880]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was
[31:00.880 --> 31:03.680]  breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:03.680 --> 31:06.920]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:06.920 --> 31:11.820]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:11.820 --> 31:15.200]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals
[31:15.200 --> 31:16.200]  to see.
[31:16.200 --> 31:17.200]  The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.200 --> 31:20.840]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:20.840 --> 31:22.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:22.760 --> 31:30.480]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.480 --> 31:31.480]  I lost my son.
[31:31.480 --> 31:32.480]  My nephew.
[31:32.480 --> 31:33.480]  My uncle.
[31:33.480 --> 31:34.480]  My son.
[31:34.480 --> 31:35.480]  On September 11, 2001.
[31:35.480 --> 31:38.760]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:38.760 --> 31:39.760]  World Trade Center 7.
[31:39.760 --> 31:42.920]  A 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.920 --> 31:46.760]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[31:46.760 --> 31:50.560]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence.
[31:50.560 --> 31:52.520]  And believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.520 --> 31:53.960]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:53.960 --> 31:54.960]  My uncle.
[31:54.960 --> 31:55.960]  My nephew.
[31:55.960 --> 31:56.960]  My son.
[31:56.960 --> 31:57.960]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.960 --> 32:00.800]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:00.800 --> 32:04.920]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:04.920 --> 32:07.240]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.240 --> 32:10.480]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have
[32:10.480 --> 32:12.720]  to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.720 --> 32:15.920]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:15.920 --> 32:19.960]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.960 --> 32:23.800]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:23.800 --> 32:25.200]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.200 --> 32:28.800]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put
[32:28.800 --> 32:32.320]  together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[32:32.320 --> 32:35.320]  due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.320 --> 32:39.320]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.320 --> 32:40.640]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.640 --> 32:44.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.000 --> 32:48.400]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.400 --> 32:50.720]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.720 --> 32:54.680]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.680 --> 33:00.120]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.120 --> 33:04.200]  Live, free speech radio.
[33:04.200 --> 33:06.000]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[33:34.200 --> 34:04.120]  So please Mr. Macklin, teach officers not to abuse the power, send a request to the
[34:04.120 --> 34:12.120]  captain of all officers, tell them to uphold the law, and please don't abuse the power.
[34:12.120 --> 34:18.120]  They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour.
[34:18.120 --> 34:23.120]  So Mr. Officer, please stop abusing your power.
[34:23.120 --> 34:28.120]  You pull me over and tell me to be silent, sir.
[34:28.120 --> 34:33.120]  I need to speak to my lawyer, Mr. Officer.
[34:33.120 --> 34:41.720]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking about
[34:41.720 --> 34:49.160]  instead of helping everybody out of their immediate issues, I'm trying to lay the groundwork
[34:49.160 --> 34:54.200]  so we have more to work with.
[34:54.200 --> 34:59.200]  Now I went through what I did in my first suit, now I'm preparing a second one to sue
[34:59.200 --> 35:04.920]  Victoria County, and there I'm going to go after access to grand juries.
[35:04.920 --> 35:12.520]  I'm going to take a whole stack of criminal complaints and then contact the clerk and
[35:12.520 --> 35:20.520]  get the names of the grand jurors and then send my criminal complaints to the grand juries.
[35:20.520 --> 35:24.920]  Well they're not going to want to give me the names, so I'll do the standard routine
[35:24.920 --> 35:30.320]  of sending it to the prosecutor addressed to the grand jury, and with a cover letter
[35:30.320 --> 35:36.840]  that I won't get back, and then I'll sue the prosecutor.
[35:36.840 --> 35:45.360]  Because the prosecutor is interfering with access to the grand jury.
[35:45.360 --> 35:48.880]  What was it Brett, 28.051?
[35:48.880 --> 35:49.880]  Yeah.
[35:49.880 --> 35:55.680]  Okay, that's the duties of grand juries, it shall be the duty of the grand jury to
[35:55.680 --> 36:04.120]  investigate into all crimes subject to indictment, and that's felonies and misdemeanors, that
[36:04.120 --> 36:10.000]  come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury, the prosecuting attorney
[36:10.000 --> 36:14.520]  or any credible person.
[36:14.520 --> 36:21.200]  Credible person is defined in Texas law as a person over the age of majority, which is
[36:21.200 --> 36:25.520]  18, and never been convicted of a felony.
[36:25.520 --> 36:29.160]  I am by statute a credible person.
[36:29.160 --> 36:35.280]  I don't care what my wife says, over and over.
[36:35.280 --> 36:38.440]  By statute I'm credible.
[36:38.440 --> 36:42.360]  She says you're under 18.
[36:42.360 --> 36:45.880]  Over 18, over 18.
[36:45.880 --> 36:47.560]  She says I act under 18.
[36:47.560 --> 36:50.560]  Oh, that's the difference, okay.
[36:50.560 --> 36:54.720]  Okay, so that's going to be the second thing I'm going to go after.
[36:54.720 --> 37:03.480]  I will go after the prosecutor and I'll then I'll petition for a declaratory judgment
[37:03.480 --> 37:11.440]  to declare that the prosecuting attorney has no power to intercede between a citizen and
[37:11.440 --> 37:13.800]  giving notice of crime to the grand jury.
[37:13.800 --> 37:16.800]  Then that opens the grand jury to us.
[37:16.800 --> 37:19.360]  So that's what I'm after.
[37:19.360 --> 37:21.880]  And we've got three callers on the board.
[37:21.880 --> 37:24.000]  So I'm going to go ahead and go to our callers.
[37:24.000 --> 37:29.640]  We've got Ted in California, hello Ted, what do you have for us today?
[37:29.640 --> 37:40.800]  Howdy, howdy, and since you guys haven't done it, it's Thursday night, June 1st
[37:40.800 --> 37:41.800]  of 2023.
[37:41.800 --> 37:46.520]  Oh, this guy is stealing my thunder.
[37:46.520 --> 37:56.800]  I only do that, it's just a half hour, I only do that on the top of the hour, unless I forget.
[37:56.800 --> 37:59.360]  So we did that, we did that starting out.
[37:59.360 --> 38:03.640]  Okay, it's the first of June.
[38:03.640 --> 38:04.640]  I missed the first call.
[38:04.640 --> 38:07.240]  Okay Ted, get back into your place.
[38:07.240 --> 38:13.520]  All right, I missed the first couple of minutes, my bad.
[38:13.520 --> 38:17.000]  But you were talking about, I think, an imminent domain thing.
[38:17.000 --> 38:25.920]  And I sent you a YouTube video about that very case where someone is explaining how
[38:25.920 --> 38:32.480]  this woman, her house was trashed by the police and she-
[38:32.480 --> 38:36.520]  Yeah, and I knew this woman.
[38:36.520 --> 38:40.440]  She had called into our show right after this happened.
[38:40.440 --> 38:41.440]  Wow.
[38:41.440 --> 38:54.960]  Okay, and then I'll quickly move on to Brett, I feel you, and it's just something we do
[38:54.960 --> 39:05.600]  and we take care of people and put ourselves, not first, but you know, a motion for enlargement
[39:05.600 --> 39:11.760]  of time, especially if it's the first request, is usually always granted and you could get
[39:11.760 --> 39:18.280]  that in tomorrow and give yourself even some more breathing room.
[39:18.280 --> 39:23.460]  And you would probably have an answer back on a motion for enlargement of time before
[39:23.460 --> 39:28.960]  the due date, so you'd know either way if you have to go with whatever you've got at
[39:28.960 --> 39:29.960]  that moment.
[39:29.960 --> 39:30.960]  Yeah.
[39:30.960 --> 39:36.280]  We filed it in Arizona, I helped a woman file in Arizona.
[39:36.280 --> 39:42.880]  The lawyers put in a request for an enlargement of time and before we had time to answer it
[39:42.880 --> 39:46.020]  like two days, the judge granted it.
[39:46.020 --> 39:52.360]  So we didn't have time to agree or disagree, the judge just gave it to them.
[39:52.360 --> 39:55.040]  Yeah, I appreciate that, Ted.
[39:55.040 --> 39:59.200]  I think in this situation, I'm not gonna do that and here's why.
[39:59.200 --> 40:06.680]  One of the issues that I'm bringing, that I brought to the district court, see the defendants
[40:06.680 --> 40:12.280]  didn't answer timely, they had 21 days, right, they didn't answer.
[40:12.280 --> 40:23.000]  On the night of the last day that they could answer, there was a document e-filed, which
[40:23.000 --> 40:29.680]  actually by rules is not allowed, it was a request for an extension of time or an application
[40:29.680 --> 40:31.880]  for extension of time.
[40:31.880 --> 40:38.000]  But that's not allowed unless it's unopposed, which means that they would have had to have
[40:38.000 --> 40:42.080]  a meet and confer and they didn't do that.
[40:42.080 --> 40:46.080]  And they're trying to say, oh, well, you don't have to have a meet and confer because proceeds
[40:46.080 --> 40:50.800]  are not required to meet and confer, but that's not the point.
[40:50.800 --> 40:55.440]  The point is, they can't slide something in there and pretend like it's unopposed.
[40:55.440 --> 40:59.880]  They actually even, when you e-file, you can control what the title of it is.
[40:59.880 --> 41:03.020]  They called it granted.
[41:03.020 --> 41:09.920]  So it looks like if you pull up on Pacer, it looks like it was already granted and they
[41:09.920 --> 41:14.440]  just tried all these little trickery, little stuff to make themselves have an extension
[41:14.440 --> 41:15.440]  of time.
[41:15.440 --> 41:18.700]  And it wasn't even the defendant who filed.
[41:18.700 --> 41:24.260]  It was some random law firm that had not appeared as counsel.
[41:24.260 --> 41:25.880]  Nothing had been filed.
[41:25.880 --> 41:26.880]  So nothing was timely.
[41:26.880 --> 41:27.880]  There was no answer.
[41:27.880 --> 41:32.640]  I had a right to default judgment and the next day they're sitting on a default judgment
[41:32.640 --> 41:44.200]  motion and they denied it as moot because the other side was imagined to have more time.
[41:44.200 --> 41:50.520]  It was like somehow automatically granted without any actual judge looking at it.
[41:50.520 --> 41:56.000]  So that issue of an extension of time could be kind of touchy since that's what I'm giving
[41:56.000 --> 41:59.280]  them a hard time about.
[41:59.280 --> 42:00.280]  That's not the only thing.
[42:00.280 --> 42:09.480]  I'm giving them 73 objections to their report and recommendations.
[42:09.480 --> 42:13.160]  Not the least of which is that there's no such thing as a report and recommendations
[42:13.160 --> 42:15.280]  authorized.
[42:15.280 --> 42:19.440]  If there had been a referral to a magistrate judge, then there would be something authorized
[42:19.440 --> 42:23.920]  called findings of fact and recommendations.
[42:23.920 --> 42:29.520]  Well, the findings of fact require them to hold evidentiary hearings, which they didn't
[42:29.520 --> 42:30.520]  do.
[42:30.520 --> 42:35.520]  So to issue something else called a report and recommendations wasn't authorized even
[42:35.520 --> 42:38.440]  if they had a referral, which they didn't.
[42:38.440 --> 42:43.320]  So it's a bunch of technical stuff that I'm picking them to pieces about the technical
[42:43.320 --> 42:44.320]  stuff.
[42:44.320 --> 42:47.760]  I don't think I want to go walk in there and go, hey, I don't really know what I'm doing.
[42:47.760 --> 42:52.920]  Can you give me a little more time?
[42:52.920 --> 42:56.960]  Even if you don't really know what you're doing, you still don't want to say that.
[42:56.960 --> 42:57.960]  Exactly.
[42:57.960 --> 43:07.360]  Well, the other thing I would have suggested is when they defiled this granted extension
[43:07.360 --> 43:12.920]  of time, I would have immediately moved to strike that for the reasons you already stated,
[43:12.920 --> 43:17.280]  including they're not counsel in the case.
[43:17.280 --> 43:22.520]  And so they were standing to even file that.
[43:22.520 --> 43:23.520]  And it wasn't signed.
[43:23.520 --> 43:26.440]  It was for a number of reasons, which yes, you're right.
[43:26.440 --> 43:30.720]  I did raise.
[43:30.720 --> 43:35.520]  And I'm sure you did a bunch of bar complaints, right?
[43:35.520 --> 43:40.840]  Oh yeah, that was the fun part.
[43:40.840 --> 43:42.800]  Brett filed bar complaints?
[43:42.800 --> 43:43.800]  Okay.
[43:43.800 --> 43:49.040]  Yeah, I bar grieved the lawyers who were actually the defendants, even though they weren't the
[43:49.040 --> 43:53.120]  ones that did what their skin key representatives did.
[43:53.120 --> 43:55.120]  And I bar grieved the representatives.
[43:55.120 --> 43:59.800]  We'll be right back.
[43:59.800 --> 44:00.800]  I love logos.
[44:00.800 --> 44:04.120]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.120 --> 44:06.960]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:06.960 --> 44:08.120]  I need my truth fixed.
[44:08.120 --> 44:10.160]  I'd be lost without logos.
[44:10.160 --> 44:12.880]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:12.880 --> 44:16.640]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[44:16.640 --> 44:20.000]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[44:20.000 --> 44:21.400]  How can I help logos?
[44:21.400 --> 44:23.560]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:23.560 --> 44:26.280]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[44:26.280 --> 44:29.080]  You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.080 --> 44:31.040]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.040 --> 44:37.400]  Now go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.400 --> 44:43.080]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.080 --> 44:44.080]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.080 --> 44:45.080]  No.
[44:45.080 --> 44:46.720]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:46.720 --> 44:47.720]  No.
[44:47.720 --> 44:48.720]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:48.720 --> 44:49.720]  No.
[44:49.720 --> 44:50.720]  I mean, yes.
[44:50.720 --> 44:51.720]  Wow.
[44:51.720 --> 44:55.520]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[44:55.520 --> 44:56.520]  Thank you so much.
[44:56.520 --> 44:58.240]  We are welcome.
[44:58.240 --> 44:59.720]  Happy holidays, logos.
[44:59.720 --> 45:04.040]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.040 --> 45:10.800]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:10.800 --> 45:13.960]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:13.960 --> 45:18.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.560 --> 45:22.800]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.800 --> 45:27.640]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:27.640 --> 45:34.440]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.440 --> 45:38.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:38.880 --> 45:43.280]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.280 --> 45:49.440]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.440 --> 45:52.240]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.240 --> 45:59.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.240 --> 46:52.160]  Okay, we are back.
[46:52.160 --> 46:57.880]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Ted in California.
[46:57.880 --> 47:03.720]  Okay, Ted, you were giving us non-legal advice.
[47:03.720 --> 47:04.720]  You can't give legal advice.
[47:04.720 --> 47:07.720]  You were giving us your legal opinion.
[47:07.720 --> 47:08.720]  Correct.
[47:08.720 --> 47:15.480]  So, I'm going to just cut it short and call in tomorrow night.
[47:15.480 --> 47:21.160]  I want to talk more about the grand jury and the process there.
[47:21.160 --> 47:24.040]  And so, Randy, we're going to give Brett a little slack here.
[47:24.040 --> 47:28.600]  We're not going to tell him to pick his phone up and beat himself around the head with it.
[47:28.600 --> 47:35.600]  And hopefully, in the future, he'll know to put his oxygen mask on first.
[47:35.600 --> 47:37.800]  And I'll call in.
[47:37.800 --> 47:40.400]  I'll try to call in tomorrow night.
[47:40.400 --> 47:41.400]  Okay.
[47:41.400 --> 47:42.400]  All right.
[47:42.400 --> 47:43.400]  Thanks, Ted.
[47:43.400 --> 47:44.400]  Okay.
[47:44.400 --> 47:53.360]  Now, it looks like Chris dropped off.
[47:53.360 --> 47:54.360]  Maybe he'll call back in.
[47:54.360 --> 47:57.280]  Now, we're going to Tina in California.
[47:57.280 --> 47:59.360]  Hello, Ms. Tina.
[47:59.360 --> 48:01.800]  What do you have for us today?
[48:01.800 --> 48:06.000]  Well, a couple of little things here.
[48:06.000 --> 48:13.560]  I've been researching and reading my voluminous loan file.
[48:13.560 --> 48:22.480]  I find today that back in 2015, it says, please consider this a rush request.
[48:22.480 --> 48:26.960]  We have a court date on Monday and would like to have confirmation of the location of the
[48:26.960 --> 48:36.000]  note, verifying physical location of the note for litigation counsel, and redirect any questions
[48:36.000 --> 48:37.000]  to Calvin.
[48:37.000 --> 48:44.240]  Then it comes back saying, from life of loan, all correspondence needs to go through counsel.
[48:44.240 --> 48:50.800]  Initial review, the file, including the original note and mortgage, is at Deutsche Bank.
[48:50.800 --> 48:53.040]  The file has not been withdrawn.
[48:53.040 --> 49:00.520]  Well, why is my OneWest supposed loan at Deutsche Bank?
[49:00.520 --> 49:10.240]  Unless they are the mysterious investor that OneWest Bank claims does not participate in
[49:10.240 --> 49:16.800]  the loss share agreement, while at the same time they claim that OneWest Bank is the investor.
[49:16.800 --> 49:27.080]  So I'm wondering how do you use it and why it's saying this?
[49:27.080 --> 49:28.080]  Any thoughts?
[49:28.080 --> 49:30.720]  Is she breaking up on your end, Brett?
[49:30.720 --> 49:32.360]  She's breaking up on mine.
[49:32.360 --> 49:33.920]  A little bit.
[49:33.920 --> 49:43.440]  But overall, so they're asking for the location, but then you're saying, what is it about OneWest?
[49:43.440 --> 49:53.880]  Well, they were asking for the location of the note and mortgage because there was litigation
[49:53.880 --> 49:54.880]  going on.
[49:54.880 --> 49:55.880]  And they said-
[49:55.880 --> 49:56.880]  Wait a minute.
[49:56.880 --> 49:57.880]  Wait a minute.
[49:57.880 --> 49:58.880]  Who's they?
[49:58.880 --> 49:59.880]  Who's they?
[49:59.880 --> 50:00.880]  OneWest Bank.
[50:00.880 --> 50:07.360]  It's in the notes on my loan file.
[50:07.360 --> 50:14.600]  So OneWest was asking you to tell the location of some physical paper note?
[50:14.600 --> 50:15.600]  No.
[50:15.600 --> 50:17.400]  No, they weren't asking me.
[50:17.400 --> 50:20.720]  This was in the notes on my loan file.
[50:20.720 --> 50:27.600]  So they were asking, I guess, OneWest or counsel or whoever, because it doesn't say-
[50:27.600 --> 50:28.600]  Ah.
[50:28.600 --> 50:29.600]  It's just a list of notes.
[50:29.600 --> 50:33.400]  And they were saying, where is the original note and mortgage?
[50:33.400 --> 50:36.600]  It comes back because they had a litigation pending from me.
[50:36.600 --> 50:40.960]  So then it comes back saying, well, it's with Deutsche Bank.
[50:40.960 --> 50:43.560]  Why is it with Deutsche Bank?
[50:43.560 --> 50:48.400]  OneWest says they're the investor, but then they say the investor will lose everything
[50:48.400 --> 50:52.520]  because they don't participate in the loss share, but OneWest did.
[50:52.520 --> 50:58.320]  So this is the first I've heard of the involvement of Deutsche Bank.
[50:58.320 --> 51:05.200]  I'm not sure how I'm going to use it yet, but it's just interesting going through this
[51:05.200 --> 51:10.440]  and finding all these little snippets, because there's another note in there that said,
[51:10.440 --> 51:11.800]  why are we asking these questions?
[51:11.800 --> 51:14.280]  This loan closed two years ago.
[51:14.280 --> 51:16.600]  Wait a minute.
[51:16.600 --> 51:17.600]  Which loan closed three years ago?
[51:17.600 --> 51:18.600]  Because mine didn't.
[51:18.600 --> 51:26.480]  But it's in my notes with my loan number saying it closed two years ago.
[51:26.480 --> 51:29.680]  What does closed mean?
[51:29.680 --> 51:31.960]  I would like to know myself.
[51:31.960 --> 51:32.960]  It doesn't say.
[51:32.960 --> 51:35.840]  It says this loan closed two years ago.
[51:35.840 --> 51:40.400]  Well, it didn't close because it was taken out in 2008.
[51:40.400 --> 51:44.480]  And we're talking about this in 2011.
[51:44.480 --> 51:50.440]  They may be talking about an internal bank transaction closing, where they transfer it
[51:50.440 --> 51:54.240]  from one holder to another.
[51:54.240 --> 51:58.480]  It could be, but the dates don't add up to even that.
[51:58.480 --> 51:59.480]  That's what puzzles me.
[51:59.480 --> 52:05.560]  Because I looked at that and thinking, well, it's when the FDIC shut down First Fed and
[52:05.560 --> 52:12.240]  transferred it to them, or when OneWest transferred it from First Fed to IndyMax six months after
[52:12.240 --> 52:17.000]  it went out of business, none of it makes any sense, date-wise.
[52:17.000 --> 52:18.680]  So I'm just going through that.
[52:18.680 --> 52:25.160]  It's just interesting when you get this, how you've got to go through another puzzle.
[52:25.160 --> 52:27.280]  And of course, they denied me discovery.
[52:27.280 --> 52:33.160]  So I can't ask these questions as yet unless they in my appeal, which this has got an interesting
[52:33.160 --> 52:34.160]  point here.
[52:34.160 --> 52:41.000]  This is the case against the attorney, and it's related to him lying to me about sending
[52:41.000 --> 52:46.320]  the original note, which of course, if it was with Douche Bank, maybe they couldn't
[52:46.320 --> 52:47.320]  send it.
[52:47.320 --> 52:55.360]  So on an appeal, they filed their answer, but they did not do the proper disclosure
[52:55.360 --> 52:58.320]  of all their insurance and related parties.
[52:58.320 --> 53:01.560]  They only did one.
[53:01.560 --> 53:10.920]  So I filed, with the help of someone, filed an opposition to that saying, hey, they haven't
[53:10.920 --> 53:15.200]  done the correct disclosure under this rule, this rule, this rule, and we're demanding
[53:15.200 --> 53:17.880]  that they do the correct disclosure.
[53:17.880 --> 53:25.360]  And my 60-day extension that I asked for will run from the day they actually do the disclosure.
[53:25.360 --> 53:28.160]  Well, they had 15 days to oppose that.
[53:28.160 --> 53:29.160]  They didn't.
[53:29.160 --> 53:39.480]  So I just recently filed a notice of non-opposition stating, you know, hey, this was in my order.
[53:39.480 --> 53:40.480]  They did not respond.
[53:40.480 --> 53:43.080]  They still have not responded.
[53:43.080 --> 53:50.000]  And so therefore, we're expecting that the court orders them to fully disclose, as per
[53:50.000 --> 53:56.120]  the rules, and also that my time runs from the time that they disclose.
[53:56.120 --> 54:02.120]  But as yet, I've had nothing from the court and nothing from the opposing counsel.
[54:02.120 --> 54:06.840]  So I'm not sure what to think on that.
[54:06.840 --> 54:12.840]  Because it was unopposed, is what I asked for automatically granted, or does the court
[54:12.840 --> 54:14.840]  have to agree to it?
[54:14.840 --> 54:19.000]  The court would have to agree to it.
[54:19.000 --> 54:26.200]  But if the court's not ruling, you could petition for writ mandamus asking the higher court
[54:26.200 --> 54:30.320]  to order the lower court to render a ruling.
[54:30.320 --> 54:32.280]  How long has it been?
[54:32.280 --> 54:33.280]  Okay.
[54:33.280 --> 54:43.440]  I filed the notice of non-opposition, well, I filed the objection to their disclosure
[54:43.440 --> 54:45.560]  on May 5th.
[54:45.560 --> 54:49.520]  They had till May 20th to respond, and they didn't.
[54:49.520 --> 54:54.640]  And I filed a notice of non-opposition on the 26th, because I was on the train.
[54:54.640 --> 54:58.520]  I didn't have Wi-Fi access or ability to do it.
[54:58.520 --> 54:59.520]  And so-
[54:59.520 --> 55:03.480]  That was the 26th of May?
[55:03.480 --> 55:04.480]  Yes.
[55:04.480 --> 55:07.320]  Well, that's only a few days.
[55:07.320 --> 55:12.240]  The courts can sometimes take 30 or 60 days to respond.
[55:12.240 --> 55:22.800]  So, but then if they take that long, when does my response time start?
[55:22.800 --> 55:30.520]  Because technically I have until June the 23rd is what we agreed upon as an extension
[55:30.520 --> 55:39.080]  of time to file my reply to theirs, but now they didn't respond properly, am I still required
[55:39.080 --> 55:44.880]  to file by the 23rd, or is my time extended?
[55:44.880 --> 55:47.880]  That's a good question.
[55:47.880 --> 55:53.520]  And the other side could be using up your time, especially if they have their courts
[55:53.520 --> 55:56.920]  bought and paid for, and this is California.
[55:56.920 --> 56:01.520]  Yes, this is California, you're right.
[56:01.520 --> 56:05.480]  So I'm just kind of wondering, how do I address this?
[56:05.480 --> 56:10.400]  Do I have the court clerk, what I'm supposed to do?
[56:10.400 --> 56:17.720]  Do I try to have everything done by the 23rd, even though I do not have the full disclosure
[56:17.720 --> 56:21.400]  from the other side as they're required by law?
[56:21.400 --> 56:29.880]  You might file a motion for extension based on the failure of opposing party to provide
[56:29.880 --> 56:31.840]  the necessary discovery.
[56:31.840 --> 56:36.880]  Well, it's not discovery, it's disclosure.
[56:36.880 --> 56:46.200]  Disclosure, that's a part of discovery, disclosures are in discovery, but anyway, they're not
[56:46.200 --> 56:48.960]  providing their disclosures.
[56:48.960 --> 56:52.920]  And so they're using up your time and ask the court to charge that time to them and
[56:52.920 --> 56:59.360]  grant you the time you need to respond based on their failure to get your discovery to
[56:59.360 --> 57:00.360]  you.
[57:00.360 --> 57:06.280]  If the judge doesn't want this pushed out, she's not going to be happy, but she'll
[57:06.280 --> 57:08.800]  be unhappy at them, not at you.
[57:08.800 --> 57:11.760]  Yeah, that sounds like a good angle.
[57:11.760 --> 57:19.840]  Yeah, that's worth thinking about for sure, because they only disclose, they said there
[57:19.840 --> 57:21.440]  is no other party to disclose.
[57:21.440 --> 57:26.680]  Well, of course there is, it's their insurance part that they have to disclose.
[57:26.680 --> 57:33.760]  The bank was bought out by another bank last year, so they're required to disclose their
[57:33.760 --> 57:37.680]  new ownership, and they haven't disclosed any of that.
[57:37.680 --> 57:43.160]  I just found out it was pulled out by researching on the internet.
[57:43.160 --> 57:49.200]  So they're a party that's of interest in this case.
[57:49.200 --> 57:50.200]  Would that be correct?
[57:50.200 --> 57:57.640]  I would think if they bought it, if there's a claim, they bought the claim.
[57:57.640 --> 57:58.640]  Yeah.
[57:58.640 --> 57:59.640]  Okay, hang on.
[57:59.640 --> 58:00.640]  You couldn't bet?
[58:00.640 --> 58:01.640]  Oh, we got about 45 seconds.
[58:01.640 --> 58:02.640]  Oh, well.
[58:02.640 --> 58:17.200]  Anyway, but a motion to the court for an extension of time calculated based on the amount of
[58:17.200 --> 58:22.800]  time the other side has used by not providing the necessary disclosure, and blaming it on
[58:22.800 --> 58:23.800]  them.
[58:23.800 --> 58:24.800]  I like that.
[58:24.800 --> 58:33.040]  You get the judge P.O. with them so she don't hit P.O. with you.
[58:33.040 --> 58:34.040]  Okay.
[58:34.040 --> 58:37.120]  We have some empty space on the board.
[58:37.120 --> 58:43.040]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call, or call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:43.040 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:53.760]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:53.760 --> 58:58.200]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.200 --> 59:03.600]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.600 --> 59:06.840]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.840 --> 59:08.720]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.720 --> 59:14.560]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.560 --> 59:18.280]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.280 --> 59:23.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.280 --> 59:28.000]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.160 --> 59:43.600]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102,
[59:43.600 --> 59:47.640]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.640 --> 59:48.640]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.640 --> 01:00:01.520]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.520 --> 01:00:05.280]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.280 --> 01:00:08.960]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:08.960 --> 01:00:10.440]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.440 --> 01:00:14.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:17.080]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.080 --> 01:00:19.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.040 --> 01:00:22.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.640 --> 01:00:27.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.440 --> 01:00:32.520]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.520 --> 01:00:35.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.200 --> 01:00:39.480]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search
[01:00:39.480 --> 01:00:43.040]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:44.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:44.920 --> 01:00:49.800]  Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six.
[01:00:49.800 --> 01:00:54.520]  Think of how the number six is implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666.
[01:00:54.520 --> 01:00:58.680]  So it would fit right in that the Seventh Amendment would be about civil trials.
[01:00:58.680 --> 01:01:01.120]  Civil seven, civil trials, get it?
[01:01:01.120 --> 01:01:05.280]  Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, like
[01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:07.080]  the dividing line between properties.
[01:01:07.080 --> 01:01:11.920]  They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs.
[01:01:11.920 --> 01:01:16.000]  The Seventh Amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:19.400]  matters instead of having a lone judge rule on the case.
[01:01:19.400 --> 01:01:21.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:21.160 --> 01:01:31.960]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.960 --> 01:01:35.720]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.720 --> 01:01:39.400]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:40.880]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.880 --> 01:01:44.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.760 --> 01:01:47.880]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:49.480]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.480 --> 01:01:53.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:53.080 --> 01:01:57.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:01:57.840 --> 01:02:03.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:05.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.600 --> 01:02:09.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:02:09.880 --> 01:02:13.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:13.400 --> 01:02:15.400]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:15.400 --> 01:02:21.280]  Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel, 1984, when Winston is threatened with his
[01:02:21.280 --> 01:02:22.400]  worst fear?
[01:02:22.400 --> 01:02:26.080]  That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face.
[01:02:26.080 --> 01:02:30.240]  But what if his worst fear was spiders, eight-legged spiders, to be exact?
[01:02:30.240 --> 01:02:33.900]  Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual.
[01:02:33.900 --> 01:02:37.600]  That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment.
[01:02:37.600 --> 01:02:41.940]  Our Founding Fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from
[01:02:41.940 --> 01:02:46.560]  creepy-crawly eight-legged punishments and other cruel and unusual prison practices that
[01:02:46.560 --> 01:02:48.160]  were common in their day.
[01:02:48.160 --> 01:02:52.480]  The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging
[01:02:52.480 --> 01:02:53.480]  excessive fines.
[01:02:53.480 --> 01:02:55.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.520 --> 01:03:20.520]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:26.220 --> 01:03:27.220]  How are we, sir?
[01:03:27.220 --> 01:03:29.380]  Chant for our words to speak.
[01:03:29.380 --> 01:03:30.740]  Mother, me tell them.
[01:03:30.740 --> 01:03:32.480]  Chant down, father.
[01:03:32.480 --> 01:03:34.020]  Chant down, father.
[01:03:34.020 --> 01:03:35.980]  Chant for justice and.
[01:03:35.980 --> 01:03:37.780]  Chant for justice.
[01:03:37.780 --> 01:03:39.460]  Chant of rubies.
[01:03:39.460 --> 01:03:41.180]  Chant for our words to speak.
[01:03:41.180 --> 01:03:43.040]  Chant for our words to speak.
[01:03:43.040 --> 01:03:45.380]  Chant for our words to speak.
[01:03:45.380 --> 01:03:48.140]  None of them will me chant when me see.
[01:03:48.140 --> 01:03:51.840]  See all man was created equally.
[01:03:51.840 --> 01:03:55.220]  Chant down Babylon and do it daily.
[01:03:55.220 --> 01:03:58.660]  And when night come, pray for everybody.
[01:03:58.660 --> 01:04:02.160]  Say one by one me haff to chant them on.
[01:04:02.160 --> 01:04:03.320]  Me chant down Babylon.
[01:04:03.320 --> 01:04:05.760]  Chant for our words to speak.
[01:04:05.760 --> 01:04:06.760]  Okay, we are back.
[01:04:06.760 --> 01:04:07.760]  Dr. Dr. Albrecht Fountain, Moving Law Radio.
[01:04:07.760 --> 01:04:10.020]  And I'm talking to my team in California.
[01:04:10.020 --> 01:04:17.260]  Okay, Tina, Brett and I, we're talking about how we're having a little difficulty with
[01:04:17.260 --> 01:04:18.260]  you.
[01:04:18.260 --> 01:04:21.620]  We're having a little difficulty keeping up.
[01:04:21.620 --> 01:04:30.300]  And I explained to him what I think it is, is you talk to us, and you've talked to us
[01:04:30.300 --> 01:04:34.220]  a lot, and you know that we know what you're talking about.
[01:04:34.220 --> 01:04:40.340]  Well, we kind of do, but we don't have it in our mind the way you do.
[01:04:40.340 --> 01:04:46.140]  And you go through this real quickly, and I find myself struggling to try to remember
[01:04:46.140 --> 01:04:50.260]  how all these pieces fit together.
[01:04:50.260 --> 01:04:56.100]  You need to give us a little more background as you move through the different things that
[01:04:56.100 --> 01:05:02.420]  are going on, so it's easier for us that we need some road markers to keep us in place.
[01:05:02.420 --> 01:05:05.220]  Does that make sense, Tina?
[01:05:05.220 --> 01:05:06.220]  That makes sense.
[01:05:06.220 --> 01:05:11.860]  Just as a little quick background on what I was just talking about, this is the case,
[01:05:11.860 --> 01:05:17.140]  you know, I filed a case against the attorney for deliberately lying about sending me the
[01:05:17.140 --> 01:05:23.860]  original note in mortgage, and you had me file a declaratory judgment on whether I'm
[01:05:23.860 --> 01:05:28.060]  entitled to it, and the court said, oh, it's all bought by Resjit Akhada, and no, you're
[01:05:28.060 --> 01:05:29.060]  not entitled.
[01:05:29.060 --> 01:05:35.620]  So then I filed a fraud claim against him for deliberately defrauding me.
[01:05:35.620 --> 01:05:41.580]  It fitted all the elements, and the same trial court said, no, it's all bought by Resjit
[01:05:41.580 --> 01:05:45.980]  Akhada, even though it's a different party, a different claim.
[01:05:45.980 --> 01:05:50.580]  It's just regarding the same property, but, you know, it's completely different than
[01:05:50.580 --> 01:05:59.700]  this all happened afterwards, where they filed the anti-SLAPP and the litigation privilege.
[01:05:59.700 --> 01:06:06.740]  So I've taken it up to the appeal court, and we're going to go from there and see what
[01:06:06.740 --> 01:06:12.580]  they say, but this is the same appellate court that said, if you continue to litigate, we
[01:06:12.580 --> 01:06:15.460]  will sanction you.
[01:06:15.460 --> 01:06:22.060]  And the opposing attorneys remembered that, and in their response, they put, as the judge
[01:06:22.060 --> 01:06:28.380]  says, we're not asking for sanctions for ourself, but we ask that you give sanctions
[01:06:28.380 --> 01:06:30.660]  to her, to some charity, really?
[01:06:30.660 --> 01:06:36.860]  Well, you can't sanction a right to go to court and have a redress of grievance, isn't
[01:06:36.860 --> 01:06:38.860]  that correct?
[01:06:38.860 --> 01:06:39.860]  Exactly.
[01:06:39.860 --> 01:06:42.460]  Sanction the exercise of a right?
[01:06:42.460 --> 01:06:43.460]  Yeah.
[01:06:43.460 --> 01:06:52.780]  So even though they threatened me with that, and they were very bullying and berating me
[01:06:52.780 --> 01:06:59.740]  by putting, basta, enough, and it's got to stop, well, no, that's bullying language
[01:06:59.740 --> 01:07:00.740]  to me.
[01:07:00.740 --> 01:07:02.860]  You know, that's trying to berate and be a little illitigant.
[01:07:02.860 --> 01:07:07.100]  Well, you're not allowed to do that because you don't have a First Amendment right to
[01:07:07.100 --> 01:07:09.060]  do that as a judge.
[01:07:09.060 --> 01:07:14.500]  And then the other side continued with that in their response, and as the judge said,
[01:07:14.500 --> 01:07:15.500]  basta.
[01:07:15.500 --> 01:07:19.540]  Well, I mean, I am working on some complaints for that, but so that's where I'm at right
[01:07:19.540 --> 01:07:20.540]  now.
[01:07:20.540 --> 01:07:25.220]  And as I said, they did not file the correct disclosures.
[01:07:25.220 --> 01:07:33.940]  They did not respond to my notice of objection to their response and lack of proper disclosure.
[01:07:33.940 --> 01:07:38.180]  And so then I filed a notice of non-response.
[01:07:38.180 --> 01:07:42.820]  So that's where I'm at, is just going after that attorney for the bank for deliberately
[01:07:42.820 --> 01:07:46.820]  lying and then saying, oh, we have litigation privilege to do whatever we want.
[01:07:46.820 --> 01:07:49.460]  No, you don't.
[01:07:49.460 --> 01:07:51.620]  It was just before the break.
[01:07:51.620 --> 01:07:53.900]  It dawned on me what you were talking about.
[01:07:53.900 --> 01:07:59.020]  I was thinking about the other suits against one West and all the rest of them, then it
[01:07:59.020 --> 01:08:01.820]  dawned on me, you sued this lawyer.
[01:08:01.820 --> 01:08:10.860]  He said, that's good, you sued the lawyer for lying, and I bet he is unhappy.
[01:08:10.860 --> 01:08:18.540]  Well, I'm sure he is, but remember you read their response and you were the one that pointed
[01:08:18.540 --> 01:08:25.780]  out to me, as soon as you read it, you said, wait a minute, here they are admitting to
[01:08:25.780 --> 01:08:32.140]  their guilt right out in the response because they said that, I think the wording was you
[01:08:32.140 --> 01:08:38.740]  knew when those statements were made, that we had no intention of following through.
[01:08:38.740 --> 01:08:42.540]  And you said that's a complete admission of guilt.
[01:08:42.540 --> 01:08:45.780]  Like I am psychic and I knew what you were thinking.
[01:08:45.780 --> 01:08:46.780]  No.
[01:08:46.780 --> 01:08:51.380]  But they said it right there, they admitted it.
[01:08:51.380 --> 01:08:55.220]  That was mind reading, but they weren't reading your mind.
[01:08:55.220 --> 01:08:59.500]  They were reading, accusing you of reading their mind.
[01:08:59.500 --> 01:09:00.500]  Yeah.
[01:09:00.500 --> 01:09:06.980]  And, you know, I mean, they're just going around the bush saying, oh, we have the absolute
[01:09:06.980 --> 01:09:07.980]  litigation privilege.
[01:09:07.980 --> 01:09:11.740]  We have this, we have that, we have a first, oh, that's the other thing they claim.
[01:09:11.740 --> 01:09:18.620]  They have a first amendment right to free speech.
[01:09:18.620 --> 01:09:23.780]  And free speech goes to free speech.
[01:09:23.780 --> 01:09:32.660]  Yeah, that whole free speech thing goes along with a responsibility or how do they call
[01:09:32.660 --> 01:09:39.500]  it a responsibility for the effects thereof.
[01:09:39.500 --> 01:09:43.260]  You don't have freedom of speech in court.
[01:09:43.260 --> 01:09:46.580]  You have freedom of speech out on the street.
[01:09:46.580 --> 01:09:53.540]  But when you walk into a courtroom environment, you don't have freedom of speech.
[01:09:53.540 --> 01:09:58.980]  You only speak when the judge tells you you can speak and you speak to what the judge
[01:09:58.980 --> 01:10:00.900]  tells you, you can speak to it.
[01:10:00.900 --> 01:10:03.060]  You don't have it in there.
[01:10:03.060 --> 01:10:11.780]  Well, they also have a duty under their business and professional rules of conduct to not mislead
[01:10:11.780 --> 01:10:16.500]  the other party, to not lie to the court, so does any other party.
[01:10:16.500 --> 01:10:21.940]  So there's all these rules of professional misconduct that they have violated.
[01:10:21.940 --> 01:10:26.140]  And then I pointed out to the lower court, they said, oh no, it's all about by res judicata
[01:10:26.140 --> 01:10:29.140]  because they can't think of anything else to argue.
[01:10:29.140 --> 01:10:32.340]  That's the only thing they ever come back with.
[01:10:32.340 --> 01:10:36.220]  They never had a good argument in the first place.
[01:10:36.220 --> 01:10:38.260]  No.
[01:10:38.260 --> 01:10:44.900]  My wife got a little placard and put on the refrigerator for me once years ago, not long
[01:10:44.900 --> 01:10:52.860]  after we got married, and it said if you can't, oh, how does it go, if you can't convince
[01:10:52.860 --> 01:10:58.820]  them with facts, baffle them with BS, something to that effect.
[01:10:58.820 --> 01:11:04.860]  That sounds like the attorneys, yeah.
[01:11:04.860 --> 01:11:07.620]  It sounds like exactly what they're doing.
[01:11:07.620 --> 01:11:14.660]  But now you, these are much different circumstances because now you've sued the attorney directly
[01:11:14.660 --> 01:11:22.380]  for what he's doing, that you were trying to get the judge to address in the foreclosure
[01:11:22.380 --> 01:11:28.080]  context, but he wouldn't, the judge wouldn't go to this.
[01:11:28.080 --> 01:11:32.460]  Now you have filed a suit that goes directly to this.
[01:11:32.460 --> 01:11:35.700]  So it would be a lot harder for them to duck and dodge.
[01:11:35.700 --> 01:11:43.060]  Except for the appeal court, judges are already against me.
[01:11:43.060 --> 01:11:53.060]  Free speech, that is an interesting argument they're bringing.
[01:11:53.060 --> 01:11:57.020]  They're saying that free speech goes to aggravated perjury.
[01:11:57.020 --> 01:11:58.020]  Yes.
[01:11:58.020 --> 01:12:00.500]  Well, they're free to speak.
[01:12:00.500 --> 01:12:06.740]  Nobody's saying that they are not allowed to open their mouth or something.
[01:12:06.740 --> 01:12:08.420]  But they also have responsibility.
[01:12:08.420 --> 01:12:13.260]  They have consequences for what they decide that they're going to speak.
[01:12:13.260 --> 01:12:17.500]  Yeah, they're yelling fire in a courtroom.
[01:12:17.500 --> 01:12:21.220]  Yeah, there are consequences.
[01:12:21.220 --> 01:12:25.900]  Doesn't mean that they didn't have a freedom to speak, but that means they're the ones
[01:12:25.900 --> 01:12:28.900]  that are liable for those consequences.
[01:12:28.900 --> 01:12:30.380]  Yes.
[01:12:30.380 --> 01:12:33.300]  Perjury, not okay.
[01:12:33.300 --> 01:12:35.020]  Absolutely promised it.
[01:12:35.020 --> 01:12:41.420]  Now, well, the other thing I bring it up, brought up, and the trial court judge ignored
[01:12:41.420 --> 01:12:47.940]  it as usual, is that, you know, he says, well, you were not, the court says you're not entitled
[01:12:47.940 --> 01:12:48.940]  to it.
[01:12:48.940 --> 01:12:53.580]  Well, really these are lunges and the original note.
[01:12:53.580 --> 01:12:54.580]  Well, really?
[01:12:54.580 --> 01:12:55.580]  Irrelevant.
[01:12:55.580 --> 01:13:00.580]  So when the attorney said, it's relevant because when the attorney said he was going to send
[01:13:00.580 --> 01:13:06.700]  them, he can't plead ignorance of the law if he thought what my attorney sent him as
[01:13:06.700 --> 01:13:08.900]  the requirement was wrong.
[01:13:08.900 --> 01:13:18.380]  He had a duty to say, Oh, Mr. Anna, we actually disagree with your request and your interpretation
[01:13:18.380 --> 01:13:19.380]  of the law.
[01:13:19.380 --> 01:13:22.220]  And we don't believe your client is entitled to it.
[01:13:22.220 --> 01:13:23.220]  That's what they should have done.
[01:13:23.220 --> 01:13:25.380]  But no, they said, Oh yeah, we'll send it to you.
[01:13:25.380 --> 01:13:28.720]  So no, you can't plead ignorance of the law as an attorney.
[01:13:28.720 --> 01:13:32.700]  You should have known, and this is what you should have said if that's what you believed.
[01:13:32.700 --> 01:13:33.700]  So.
[01:13:33.700 --> 01:13:35.700]  I still say that's irrelevant.
[01:13:35.700 --> 01:13:39.300]  Whether or not you had access to it, it doesn't matter.
[01:13:39.300 --> 01:13:45.500]  If somebody had promised you, the attorney had promised you something else that you didn't
[01:13:45.500 --> 01:13:47.140]  really have a right to.
[01:13:47.140 --> 01:13:52.460]  He says, yeah, I'll promise I'll come and, you know, your car broke down a block away.
[01:13:52.460 --> 01:13:53.460]  No problem.
[01:13:53.460 --> 01:13:54.460]  I promise.
[01:13:54.460 --> 01:13:58.060]  After this court case, I'll go and help pick you up and do that.
[01:13:58.060 --> 01:14:03.100]  And then later when you expected him to do what he promised he would do, he says, Oh,
[01:14:03.100 --> 01:14:04.100]  you should have known.
[01:14:04.100 --> 01:14:05.100]  I was just kidding.
[01:14:05.100 --> 01:14:06.940]  I'm not going to help anybody.
[01:14:06.940 --> 01:14:10.100]  You have a right to rely on what somebody promises.
[01:14:10.100 --> 01:14:13.020]  And he did actually much worse than that.
[01:14:13.020 --> 01:14:16.220]  He put it on the record in a court case.
[01:14:16.220 --> 01:14:21.060]  And you relied on that and you were harmed in a court case by that.
[01:14:21.060 --> 01:14:25.500]  So yes, it's, I think, irrelevant.
[01:14:25.500 --> 01:14:31.540]  Yeah, it's irrelevant whether a court would have thought that you had a right to have
[01:14:31.540 --> 01:14:34.540]  that thing.
[01:14:34.540 --> 01:14:38.300]  That's not the point.
[01:14:38.300 --> 01:14:40.300]  His statement was proactive.
[01:14:40.300 --> 01:14:45.300]  He made a proactive statement that he didn't have to make.
[01:14:45.300 --> 01:14:46.580]  Yeah.
[01:14:46.580 --> 01:14:51.500]  If he had said to you, instead of what he did say, if he had said, I don't think I have
[01:14:51.500 --> 01:14:54.220]  to provide that to you.
[01:14:54.220 --> 01:14:56.180]  Let's see what the court thinks.
[01:14:56.180 --> 01:15:00.260]  And then you would have had a motion or an objection and the judge would have to adjudicate
[01:15:00.260 --> 01:15:02.500]  whether or not you have a right to that.
[01:15:02.500 --> 01:15:04.500]  Well then that's different.
[01:15:04.500 --> 01:15:05.500]  Correct.
[01:15:05.500 --> 01:15:06.500]  Correct.
[01:15:06.500 --> 01:15:14.300]  But he just went ahead out there and just spontaneously made you a promise.
[01:15:14.300 --> 01:15:15.300]  Yes.
[01:15:15.300 --> 01:15:20.180]  And not only once, but he made that promise twice in writing.
[01:15:20.180 --> 01:15:28.020]  And under California Evidence Code 623, a party cannot change their mind.
[01:15:28.020 --> 01:15:33.540]  Once they've said something, they can't change their mind in any other litigation.
[01:15:33.540 --> 01:15:35.540]  They can't contradict themselves.
[01:15:35.540 --> 01:15:38.340]  Well, he's now contradicting himself.
[01:15:38.340 --> 01:15:45.460]  And that goes directly to the concept of collateral estoppel.
[01:15:45.460 --> 01:15:48.900]  That's exactly what collateral estoppel is.
[01:15:48.900 --> 01:15:50.300]  Yes.
[01:15:50.300 --> 01:15:57.380]  But the judge, it's all about by restricting his conduct.
[01:15:57.380 --> 01:16:06.380]  Well, we'll see how it works in this case, because now this is the issue before the court.
[01:16:06.380 --> 01:16:16.420]  So the lawyer would probably be well advised to get his insurance carrier to make you a
[01:16:16.420 --> 01:16:17.420]  deal.
[01:16:17.420 --> 01:16:24.140]  Have you tried the Stowars Doctrine?
[01:16:24.140 --> 01:16:25.140]  Not yet.
[01:16:25.140 --> 01:16:26.140]  Okay.
[01:16:26.140 --> 01:16:33.860]  I've talked about it, I thought about it, but I haven't tried it.
[01:16:33.860 --> 01:16:34.860]  Okay.
[01:16:34.860 --> 01:16:35.860]  Do you have anything else on the other side?
[01:16:35.860 --> 01:16:36.860]  Information.
[01:16:36.860 --> 01:16:37.860]  No, no.
[01:16:37.860 --> 01:16:38.860]  I'll let you go to other corners.
[01:16:38.860 --> 01:16:43.860]  And thank you for your input on values and appreciate it.
[01:16:43.860 --> 01:16:45.820]  Thank you, Tina.
[01:16:45.820 --> 01:16:54.580]  This is Randy Kelt and Brett Fountain, we have Mike from Tennessee, John from New York.
[01:16:54.580 --> 01:17:00.700]  Pick him up on the other side, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.700 --> 01:17:05.100]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[01:17:05.100 --> 01:17:06.100]  Word?
[01:17:06.100 --> 01:17:11.220]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[01:17:11.220 --> 01:17:17.620]  Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:17.620 --> 01:17:22.140]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[01:17:22.140 --> 01:17:24.540]  dividing the word of truth.
[01:17:24.540 --> 01:17:28.520]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse
[01:17:28.520 --> 01:17:31.820]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:17:31.820 --> 01:17:36.460]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[01:17:36.460 --> 01:17:38.860]  and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.860 --> 01:17:43.380]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.380 --> 01:17:47.700]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[01:17:47.700 --> 01:17:49.980]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:49.980 --> 01:17:56.620]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[01:17:56.620 --> 01:18:00.860]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.860 --> 01:18:05.460]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:05.460 --> 01:18:06.860]  of nutrition.
[01:18:06.860 --> 01:18:10.700]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all
[01:18:10.700 --> 01:18:11.700]  that.
[01:18:11.700 --> 01:18:17.300]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.300 --> 01:18:23.620]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[01:18:23.620 --> 01:18:25.900]  provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.900 --> 01:18:31.860]  LogosRadioNetwork gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.860 --> 01:18:37.100]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:18:37.100 --> 01:18:40.300]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.300 --> 01:18:46.220]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:18:46.220 --> 01:18:47.860]  quality radio.
[01:18:47.860 --> 01:18:52.180]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.180 --> 01:18:57.420]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:18:57.420 --> 01:18:59.420]  increase your income.
[01:18:59.420 --> 01:19:02.860]  This is the LogosRadioNetwork.
[01:19:02.860 --> 01:19:05.540]  This is the LogosRadioNetwork.
[01:19:05.540 --> 01:19:35.020]  This is the LogosRadioNetwork.
[01:19:36.140 --> 01:19:41.140]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:41.140 --> 01:19:46.340]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:46.340 --> 01:19:54.940]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:54.940 --> 01:20:00.540]  Hang on to me.
[01:20:00.540 --> 01:20:09.020]  Okay, we are back, Randy Carroll from Brent Mountain Radio on this Thursday, the first
[01:20:09.020 --> 01:20:13.740]  day of June, 2023.
[01:20:13.740 --> 01:20:17.540]  And we're going to Mike in Tennessee.
[01:20:17.540 --> 01:20:18.540]  Hello, Mike.
[01:20:18.540 --> 01:20:23.060]  Hey, how y'all doing out there?
[01:20:23.060 --> 01:20:25.620]  We're doing pretty good down here.
[01:20:25.620 --> 01:20:28.340]  What do y'all got for today?
[01:20:28.340 --> 01:20:34.980]  Well, I had a question for you there, Mr. Kelton.
[01:20:34.980 --> 01:20:40.420]  Last week, I was listening to the show, you had said something about ongoing criminal
[01:20:40.420 --> 01:20:41.420]  enterprise.
[01:20:41.420 --> 01:20:44.140]  Can you elaborate on that?
[01:20:44.140 --> 01:20:48.420]  Is there any federal case law on that?
[01:20:48.420 --> 01:20:57.340]  Racketeering-inspired criminal enterprise, criminal body enterprise.
[01:20:57.340 --> 01:21:00.100]  Criminal what, Brent?
[01:21:00.100 --> 01:21:01.100]  Organization.
[01:21:01.100 --> 01:21:02.500]  Yeah, organization.
[01:21:02.500 --> 01:21:07.060]  I think it's influence, racketeering-influenced, yeah.
[01:21:07.060 --> 01:21:14.420]  Yeah, racketeering-influenced criminal organization, RICO.
[01:21:14.420 --> 01:21:16.140]  RICO is a special kind of suit.
[01:21:16.140 --> 01:21:25.140]  It's a law that was put in to give the government a way to go after organized crime.
[01:21:25.140 --> 01:21:27.700]  Yeah, corrupt organizations.
[01:21:27.700 --> 01:21:31.580]  So there has to be at least two acts.
[01:21:31.580 --> 01:21:37.380]  I think they've got 35 different ones.
[01:21:37.380 --> 01:21:44.540]  Multiple predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal enterprise.
[01:21:44.540 --> 01:21:51.220]  Multiple predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal enterprise.
[01:21:51.220 --> 01:21:56.500]  Okay, is there a federal case law that I can cite?
[01:21:56.500 --> 01:21:57.500]  Big time.
[01:21:57.500 --> 01:22:05.700]  Well, you'd sue them using OJU U.S. Code 1983, but RICO, there is a RICO statute.
[01:22:05.700 --> 01:22:08.460]  Just look up R-I-C-O, RICO statute.
[01:22:08.460 --> 01:22:13.380]  Yeah, I think it's 1961.
[01:22:13.380 --> 01:22:15.860]  Let's see.
[01:22:15.860 --> 01:22:22.580]  In Texas, we've got Chapter 71, Texas Penal Code goes to Street Gang Statute of Organized
[01:22:22.580 --> 01:22:23.580]  Crime.
[01:22:23.580 --> 01:22:33.780]  Every state has one, and then we have the Fed that overreaches all of it.
[01:22:33.780 --> 01:22:34.780]  We have sued-
[01:22:34.780 --> 01:22:43.460]  The ongoing criminal enterprise, it's going to be in the municipal court, the probate
[01:22:43.460 --> 01:22:53.060]  court out there, with the ongoing criminal enterprise, because they have stolen my inherited
[01:22:53.060 --> 01:22:58.380]  property along with the closed union bar association shop.
[01:22:58.380 --> 01:23:05.540]  So these third-party leases just come in there and just gives them the job, and the probate
[01:23:05.540 --> 01:23:13.740]  court takes 30% of the sale of the state on top of that sale-
[01:23:13.740 --> 01:23:14.740]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:14.740 --> 01:23:15.740]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:15.740 --> 01:23:16.740]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:16.740 --> 01:23:23.060]  You have started in the middle of a big story.
[01:23:23.060 --> 01:23:25.060]  What the heck are you talking about?
[01:23:25.060 --> 01:23:30.700]  Yeah, he's launching into it.
[01:23:30.700 --> 01:23:37.300]  So you had, did you say you had your property, there was something inherited, but you never
[01:23:37.300 --> 01:23:43.700]  did get to see it because a bunch of lawyers swept in and they sold it and divvied it up?
[01:23:43.700 --> 01:23:47.380]  Well, they're a criminal organization.
[01:23:47.380 --> 01:23:54.180]  It's the probate court out there in California, which they have no sense of jurisdiction.
[01:23:54.180 --> 01:24:02.260]  The person who's blood-related is the superior rightful heir, not the state probate court
[01:24:02.260 --> 01:24:05.660]  or the third-party probate leases and lawyers.
[01:24:05.660 --> 01:24:06.660]  Wait a minute.
[01:24:06.660 --> 01:24:13.860]  You're still, you're starting in the middle of something, and you're making really far-reaching
[01:24:13.860 --> 01:24:22.940]  assertions with no structure behind it, so all we're hearing is a lot of vague accusations,
[01:24:22.940 --> 01:24:27.140]  and we have no idea what you're talking about.
[01:24:27.140 --> 01:24:34.540]  Here's the thing, Mike, when we, it's natural for us to do what you're doing right now,
[01:24:34.540 --> 01:24:41.580]  but what happens is you've got all these facts that are going on in your mind, and those
[01:24:41.580 --> 01:24:48.460]  facts would lead anybody, a reasonable person, to some kind of conclusion, and you're starting
[01:24:48.460 --> 01:24:54.340]  in here by telling us your conclusion, but we don't know the facts, so everybody would
[01:24:54.340 --> 01:24:59.220]  probably come to that same conclusion, oh, they're all criminals, and oh, it's a whole
[01:24:59.220 --> 01:25:03.780]  bunch of leeches, and we probably would come to that very same conclusion, but we don't
[01:25:03.780 --> 01:25:07.300]  know what the facts underneath it are that you're talking about.
[01:25:07.300 --> 01:25:09.780]  You know, like, was there a sale?
[01:25:09.780 --> 01:25:12.040]  Your property was sold?
[01:25:12.040 --> 01:25:15.380]  Somebody decided that they owned your property more than you do, and they decided they wanted
[01:25:15.380 --> 01:25:18.440]  to sell it and take all the proceeds, and you know what I mean?
[01:25:18.440 --> 01:25:22.460]  We don't know those facts, you do, and it's real easy for your mind to just go ahead and
[01:25:22.460 --> 01:25:26.860]  jump to the conclusion part and tell us the conclusion, but we don't know what's underneath
[01:25:26.860 --> 01:25:27.860]  it yet.
[01:25:27.860 --> 01:25:37.620]  Yeah, that's basically what the organized crime criminal closed union shops did.
[01:25:37.620 --> 01:25:38.620]  They steal people's properties.
[01:25:38.620 --> 01:25:46.420]  I mean, this is not just in the state of California, but it's all across the, in most states.
[01:25:46.420 --> 01:25:52.300]  They give the illusion to the republic that they have the authority and it belongs in
[01:25:52.300 --> 01:25:55.260]  probate court, and that's not true.
[01:25:55.260 --> 01:26:01.340]  They have no subject matter jurisdiction, just because a loved one or one of your relatives
[01:26:01.340 --> 01:26:06.540]  didn't leave a trust or will, therefore they say, well, the state has to come in and cause
[01:26:06.540 --> 01:26:09.500]  controversy and give you up the property.
[01:26:09.500 --> 01:26:15.140]  Well, that's not conserving the state to the proper heirs.
[01:26:15.140 --> 01:26:19.420]  Probate court's all about sales, and that's exactly what they did over my objection.
[01:26:19.420 --> 01:26:23.120]  But like I said, this can't be said in one phone call.
[01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:32.900]  My call was to see Mr. Kelton, I know I emailed you quite a few documents on that two weeks
[01:26:32.900 --> 01:26:40.780]  ago, and I never heard from Ted Scarlett, so I guess he don't want to talk, but trying
[01:26:40.780 --> 01:26:47.020]  to close any shop attorney out there, it's kind of hard because they're all part of the
[01:26:47.020 --> 01:26:49.260]  same racket.
[01:26:49.260 --> 01:26:57.360]  It will be really hard to get any attorney if you just throw them a whole stack of documents.
[01:26:57.360 --> 01:27:02.340]  People send me stacks of documents all the time and I take a stack of documents.
[01:27:02.340 --> 01:27:04.980]  What am I going to do with that?
[01:27:04.980 --> 01:27:06.620]  I can start reading these documents.
[01:27:06.620 --> 01:27:08.420]  You know what they all go to.
[01:27:08.420 --> 01:27:14.140]  The thing I always want to see is a timeline.
[01:27:14.140 --> 01:27:18.260]  What happened and when, this happened and this happened and this happened.
[01:27:18.260 --> 01:27:22.420]  Now I can look at these documents and I can see where they go and kind of get an idea
[01:27:22.420 --> 01:27:24.500]  what's going on.
[01:27:24.500 --> 01:27:31.380]  But also after the timeline, the documents need some kind of a synopsis of what they
[01:27:31.380 --> 01:27:33.940]  are.
[01:27:33.940 --> 01:27:41.740]  I don't have time to take a whole stack of somebody's documents and read them from scratch.
[01:27:41.740 --> 01:27:46.820]  I'd spend all my time reading people's documents, so I don't even, when I just get a stack of
[01:27:46.820 --> 01:27:52.260]  documents, I don't even waste my time to try to figure out what all that stuff is unless
[01:27:52.260 --> 01:27:55.220]  you give me some kind of organizing principle.
[01:27:55.220 --> 01:28:01.660]  Well, that was the timeline I sent you.
[01:28:01.660 --> 01:28:03.740]  No, no.
[01:28:03.740 --> 01:28:04.740]  That was the timeline.
[01:28:04.740 --> 01:28:09.020]  I think, no, if you had a timeline, you would, I think it's a timeline.
[01:28:09.020 --> 01:28:12.220]  You would absolutely be certain because they're hard to write.
[01:28:12.220 --> 01:28:18.660]  It's a lot of work to write a timeline, but you need one.
[01:28:18.660 --> 01:28:23.100]  If you're going to be able to talk about these issues, you need a timeline.
[01:28:23.100 --> 01:28:28.180]  You needed to come on here and say, I had a relative in California.
[01:28:28.180 --> 01:28:37.340]  He or he passed away, he or he had assets, but didn't have a will, give us kind of the
[01:28:37.340 --> 01:28:39.020]  structure of what's going on here.
[01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:43.020]  You just come in here and said, oh, they're all a bunch of crooks.
[01:28:43.020 --> 01:28:48.340]  Okay, that may be, but that's not helpful.
[01:28:48.340 --> 01:28:51.820]  We don't know how to help you because we just don't have enough information.
[01:28:51.820 --> 01:28:57.860]  Well, I mean, it's the same thing with y'all's friends out there, what you're doing.
[01:28:57.860 --> 01:29:02.620]  It's the same criminality organization that you're up against.
[01:29:02.620 --> 01:29:07.460]  We're all on the fighting for the rights.
[01:29:07.460 --> 01:29:08.460]  Okay.
[01:29:08.460 --> 01:29:09.460]  Okay.
[01:29:09.460 --> 01:29:17.540]  When I talk about, say, Victoria County operating an ongoing criminal conspiracy, or even better
[01:29:17.540 --> 01:29:24.660]  Travis County, I claimed specifically what they were doing.
[01:29:24.660 --> 01:29:30.420]  They arrest someone instead of taking them directly to the nearest magistrate the way
[01:29:30.420 --> 01:29:33.860]  Article 1406 and 1516 commands them to do it.
[01:29:33.860 --> 01:29:38.420]  I'm just saying you're going up the same against the criminal organization.
[01:29:38.420 --> 01:29:39.420]  Yeah.
[01:29:39.420 --> 01:29:40.420]  Okay.
[01:29:40.420 --> 01:29:43.420]  So I don't know what you're asking us then.
[01:29:43.420 --> 01:29:51.740]  If I'm to understand what you're talking about, I need some structure.
[01:29:51.740 --> 01:30:02.980]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.980 --> 01:30:08.500]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps
[01:30:08.500 --> 01:30:09.500]  on growing.
[01:30:09.500 --> 01:30:12.580]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.580 --> 01:30:16.740]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.740 --> 01:30:18.460]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.460 --> 01:30:22.060]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.060 --> 01:30:27.060]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.060 --> 01:30:32.300]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.300 --> 01:30:34.820]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.820 --> 01:30:40.460]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.460 --> 01:30:42.180]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.180 --> 01:30:44.380]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.380 --> 01:30:48.540]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.540 --> 01:30:52.140]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:52.140 --> 01:30:55.900]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:55.900 --> 01:31:00.900]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually
[01:31:00.900 --> 01:31:04.460]  makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.460 --> 01:31:08.420]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter
[01:31:08.420 --> 01:31:10.740]  in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:10.740 --> 01:31:15.860]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:15.860 --> 01:31:18.140]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:31:18.140 --> 01:31:21.260]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.260 --> 01:31:31.180]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.180 --> 01:31:36.540]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.540 --> 01:31:39.020]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.020 --> 01:31:43.580]  1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.580 --> 01:31:46.300]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.300 --> 01:31:49.020]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.020 --> 01:31:50.500]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.500 --> 01:31:51.500]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.500 --> 01:31:52.860]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.860 --> 01:31:53.860]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.860 --> 01:31:55.540]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.540 --> 01:31:58.140]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.140 --> 01:32:02.740]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.740 --> 01:32:05.620]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:05.620 --> 01:32:09.380]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going
[01:32:09.380 --> 01:32:13.340]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.340 --> 01:32:16.540]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.540 --> 01:32:20.580]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.580 --> 01:32:24.420]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.420 --> 01:32:25.820]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.820 --> 01:32:29.420]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put
[01:32:29.420 --> 01:32:32.940]  together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[01:32:32.940 --> 01:32:35.900]  due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.900 --> 01:32:39.900]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.900 --> 01:32:41.260]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.260 --> 01:32:44.460]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.460 --> 01:32:49.020]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.020 --> 01:32:51.340]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.340 --> 01:32:55.300]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.300 --> 01:33:00.860]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:00.860 --> 01:33:07.140]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:34:00.860 --> 01:34:17.660]  We're talking to Mike in Tennessee.
[01:34:17.660 --> 01:34:23.140]  Baby Mike, when you came on, I misunderstood what you were here for.
[01:34:23.140 --> 01:34:31.260]  Did you come here to ask us for something, some input or something, in particular?
[01:34:31.260 --> 01:34:42.580]  Well, I mean, I just explained it in simple, and it's the truth, and I think the public
[01:34:42.580 --> 01:34:49.380]  needs to know, and most people are aware of it, even watching Mr. Craig.
[01:34:49.380 --> 01:34:50.380]  Yeah.
[01:34:50.380 --> 01:34:56.700]  I think everybody is aware that there are two primary courts that are very corrupt,
[01:34:56.700 --> 01:34:59.380]  and that's family courts and probate.
[01:34:59.380 --> 01:35:01.820]  Oh, big time, big time.
[01:35:01.820 --> 01:35:08.780]  I mean, not just the probate courts, but most of the courts are very much arbitrary, and
[01:35:08.780 --> 01:35:10.580]  they're corrupt to the bone.
[01:35:10.580 --> 01:35:20.220]  But like I said, you're dealing with an ongoing criminal organization, and I think
[01:35:20.220 --> 01:35:28.340]  this country has been taken over by the Bar Association for the last 80 or 90 years.
[01:35:28.340 --> 01:35:37.220]  They've been oppressing the public so much, and it's like what you're going through,
[01:35:37.220 --> 01:35:39.980]  what Mr. O'Kellen is going through.
[01:35:39.980 --> 01:35:44.740]  He said he filed a complaint, as we listened earlier, he said the defendants didn't answer.
[01:35:44.740 --> 01:35:48.700]  I think a motion through default should have been filed, maybe he already did or didn't.
[01:35:48.700 --> 01:35:50.660]  I'm not sure.
[01:35:50.660 --> 01:35:56.460]  But filing a motion through default when they had 21 days to answer, that should have been
[01:35:56.460 --> 01:35:57.460]  done.
[01:35:57.460 --> 01:36:06.060]  But like I said, when you're pro se, it's hard for the person to be respected by licensed
[01:36:06.060 --> 01:36:11.300]  bar attorneys because they really despise people in sweet jurists and pro se as their
[01:36:11.300 --> 01:36:12.300]  own man.
[01:36:12.300 --> 01:36:14.780]  So they really despise you.
[01:36:14.780 --> 01:36:22.100]  And I think most people in the public should realize, like I was listening to Ms. Tina,
[01:36:22.100 --> 01:36:25.780]  she may have to go to United States District Court to get some justice, same thing with
[01:36:25.780 --> 01:36:26.780]  me in my case.
[01:36:26.780 --> 01:36:31.820]  I may have to go to United States District Court, because at the lower court levels,
[01:36:31.820 --> 01:36:38.060]  I don't think you'll get any justice, and I'll let somebody else get on.
[01:36:38.060 --> 01:36:46.100]  Okay, I get that, especially if you're pro se.
[01:36:46.100 --> 01:36:53.020]  And I've sat in court and watched judges deal with pro ses and do everything they can to
[01:36:53.020 --> 01:36:55.660]  help them.
[01:36:55.660 --> 01:36:59.580]  But the pro ses just wouldn't let the judge.
[01:36:59.580 --> 01:37:05.540]  It was one case, this woman, Bonnie, just got five years in prison.
[01:37:05.540 --> 01:37:12.060]  I was encouraged to come to one of her hearings, and she was in the Republic of Texas group
[01:37:12.060 --> 01:37:16.340]  who preached this patriot mythology stuff.
[01:37:16.340 --> 01:37:21.580]  And they were railing about this judge, about a family court judge, about how horrible she
[01:37:21.580 --> 01:37:23.820]  was and on and on and on.
[01:37:23.820 --> 01:37:26.260]  And I went and sat in this hearing.
[01:37:26.260 --> 01:37:35.940]  It was a sanctioned hearing or a contempt of court hearing, and this judge was doing everything
[01:37:35.940 --> 01:37:46.180]  she could to get Bonnie to give her one reason not to file for contempt of court with her
[01:37:46.180 --> 01:37:47.760]  against her.
[01:37:47.760 --> 01:37:52.220]  And she just would not let her.
[01:37:52.220 --> 01:37:55.900]  Halfway through, I couldn't listen anymore, got up and walked out.
[01:37:55.900 --> 01:37:59.540]  The judge gave her 30 days.
[01:37:59.540 --> 01:38:07.180]  I thought, you know, if I was that judge, I'd probably gave her 10 years.
[01:38:07.180 --> 01:38:16.100]  She was struggling to tell her, please, just tell me this, oh, I'm not the person you're
[01:38:16.100 --> 01:38:17.100]  addressing.
[01:38:17.100 --> 01:38:23.700]  I'm not the all-caps and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, on and on.
[01:38:23.700 --> 01:38:27.260]  She wanted her 30 days in jail.
[01:38:27.260 --> 01:38:30.660]  And the judge was absolutely frustrated.
[01:38:30.660 --> 01:38:33.620]  It's not all the judges.
[01:38:33.620 --> 01:38:37.140]  You get a pro se, come into your court.
[01:38:37.140 --> 01:38:40.740]  I sat in a mock trial once in Massachusetts.
[01:38:40.740 --> 01:38:43.620]  I was the judge in a mock trial.
[01:38:43.620 --> 01:38:49.220]  This guy had sent some liens to some public officials in Pennsylvania, and they were prosecuting
[01:38:49.220 --> 01:38:50.220]  him in Pennsylvania.
[01:38:50.220 --> 01:38:55.540]  But he lived in Massachusetts, so we had a mock trial.
[01:38:55.540 --> 01:39:01.500]  And him and this guy who's helping him got up there, and they were just blasting out
[01:39:01.500 --> 01:39:04.060]  this patriot mythology stuff.
[01:39:04.060 --> 01:39:10.100]  Well, I was sitting as the judge, and I was surprised at how different it was.
[01:39:10.100 --> 01:39:18.100]  As the judge, it was my job to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[01:39:18.100 --> 01:39:23.220]  and apply the law as it came to me to the facts in the case.
[01:39:23.220 --> 01:39:29.020]  That's my job, but not giving me any facts in the case.
[01:39:29.020 --> 01:39:33.740]  You're giving me political ideology.
[01:39:33.740 --> 01:39:37.980]  And even if I agreed with him, it wouldn't help.
[01:39:37.980 --> 01:39:40.740]  You have to give me facts in law.
[01:39:40.740 --> 01:39:44.340]  If you don't, I can't rule in your favor.
[01:39:44.340 --> 01:39:53.700]  People go into family courts, and they are at their absolute worst.
[01:39:53.700 --> 01:39:56.860]  And they tell the judge how horrible the wife was.
[01:39:56.860 --> 01:40:01.900]  The wife tells the judge how horrible the husband is.
[01:40:01.900 --> 01:40:06.580]  No matter what the judge does, somebody's not gonna be happy.
[01:40:06.580 --> 01:40:11.180]  And if the judge does her job right, neither side will be happy.
[01:40:11.180 --> 01:40:12.720]  Probate.
[01:40:12.720 --> 01:40:14.540]  People don't know anything about probate.
[01:40:14.540 --> 01:40:17.820]  They don't understand how it works.
[01:40:17.820 --> 01:40:22.780]  And lawyers absolutely take advantage of that, because there's a lot of money involved.
[01:40:22.780 --> 01:40:25.820]  So yeah, I absolutely agree, they're corrupt.
[01:40:25.820 --> 01:40:30.420]  But if we're gonna do anything about it, we're gonna do our homework.
[01:40:30.420 --> 01:40:35.100]  Rhett, did I chase him off?
[01:40:35.100 --> 01:40:37.340]  I think he got off right at the beginning.
[01:40:37.340 --> 01:40:39.580]  I hope he was hearing some of that.
[01:40:39.580 --> 01:40:42.740]  Okay, I didn't mean to run him off.
[01:40:42.740 --> 01:40:48.380]  But yeah, I agree with him, the courts are a mess, especially in California.
[01:40:48.380 --> 01:40:49.580]  You mentioned it's two courts.
[01:40:49.580 --> 01:40:53.300]  I was thinking that you were gonna mention two other courts.
[01:40:53.300 --> 01:41:02.180]  It's the courts you know about, and then the courts you don't.
[01:41:02.180 --> 01:41:03.180]  I'm not sure.
[01:41:03.180 --> 01:41:06.740]  Two that I think, you said there are two that are corrupt.
[01:41:06.740 --> 01:41:08.540]  It's family and probate.
[01:41:08.540 --> 01:41:11.660]  And I was thinking you were gonna say it's the courts you've been in, and the courts
[01:41:11.660 --> 01:41:12.660]  you haven't.
[01:41:12.660 --> 01:41:17.740]  No, that might have been a good idea.
[01:41:17.740 --> 01:41:26.220]  But those two, I get more complaining and more really negative feedback on those two
[01:41:26.220 --> 01:41:28.820]  courts more than any other.
[01:41:28.820 --> 01:41:32.900]  People complain about tax, and they complain about criminal.
[01:41:32.900 --> 01:41:39.500]  Well, there's something that's just gut wrenching at a visceral level, people getting
[01:41:39.500 --> 01:41:44.540]  their entire families torn apart or getting their entire life savings in their homes and
[01:41:44.540 --> 01:41:46.340]  everything ripped away from them.
[01:41:46.340 --> 01:41:51.340]  There's something that's just deep and visceral about that.
[01:41:51.340 --> 01:41:55.660]  And almost always nobody's gonna be happy.
[01:41:55.660 --> 01:42:00.740]  And the more they fight with one another, the more the lawyers take.
[01:42:00.740 --> 01:42:04.900]  And the lawyers do everything they can to set them against one another.
[01:42:04.900 --> 01:42:07.900]  Exactly.
[01:42:07.900 --> 01:42:15.060]  We just have to learn what we're doing, get better at what we're doing.
[01:42:15.060 --> 01:42:21.620]  So I know I didn't answer his question, didn't give him what he wanted, but oh well.
[01:42:21.620 --> 01:42:25.940]  Well, and I see Ted came back on here.
[01:42:25.940 --> 01:42:28.460]  Yeah, I saw him hide.
[01:42:28.460 --> 01:42:30.900]  I saw him hide down there at the bottom.
[01:42:30.900 --> 01:42:36.100]  So we got John in New York, we've got what's left of this segment.
[01:42:36.100 --> 01:42:40.660]  We could give John a minute and a half, couldn't we?
[01:42:40.660 --> 01:42:41.660]  John?
[01:42:41.660 --> 01:42:42.660]  Yup?
[01:42:42.660 --> 01:42:46.580]  You got a minute and 15 seconds.
[01:42:46.580 --> 01:42:47.580]  Let us have it.
[01:42:47.580 --> 01:42:48.580]  Well, okay.
[01:42:48.580 --> 01:42:49.980]  Would you do me a favor?
[01:42:49.980 --> 01:42:50.980]  And I need your help.
[01:42:50.980 --> 01:42:52.980]  I need it right away.
[01:42:52.980 --> 01:42:58.740]  You're not gonna talk about a seatbelt issue, are you?
[01:42:58.740 --> 01:42:59.740]  A what?
[01:42:59.740 --> 01:43:02.740]  No, no seatbelt tickets.
[01:43:02.740 --> 01:43:03.740]  Okay.
[01:43:03.740 --> 01:43:06.780]  Yeah, I was just picking on you.
[01:43:06.780 --> 01:43:11.180]  I was just filling some time, we were a minute before the break and we didn't have time
[01:43:11.180 --> 01:43:17.100]  to get into anything, so I figured it'd be a good opportunity to pick on you a little
[01:43:17.100 --> 01:43:18.100]  bit.
[01:43:18.100 --> 01:43:19.100]  Okay.
[01:43:19.100 --> 01:43:20.100]  That's all right.
[01:43:20.100 --> 01:43:21.100]  You can pick on me.
[01:43:21.100 --> 01:43:22.100]  I appreciate it.
[01:43:22.100 --> 01:43:30.500]  Anyway, this is about code enforcement offices and I just want to reiterate, make sure I
[01:43:30.500 --> 01:43:34.980]  understand and that's basically it.
[01:43:34.980 --> 01:43:35.980]  Okay.
[01:43:35.980 --> 01:43:36.980]  Okay.
[01:43:36.980 --> 01:43:37.980]  Hang on.
[01:43:37.980 --> 01:43:38.980]  Yeah.
[01:43:38.980 --> 01:43:45.500]  I just got the grass police ruling, Jerry sent it to me in snail mail, so I finally
[01:43:45.500 --> 01:43:46.500]  got it.
[01:43:46.500 --> 01:43:48.500]  I've got somebody that's been wanting it.
[01:43:48.500 --> 01:43:49.500]  Okay.
[01:43:49.500 --> 01:43:50.500]  Hang on.
[01:43:50.500 --> 01:43:59.780]  I just got a call in numbers, we've got one segment, two people, we'll be right back.
[01:43:59.780 --> 01:44:04.420]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:44:04.420 --> 01:44:08.580]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:08.580 --> 01:44:12.900]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:44:12.900 --> 01:44:13.900]  can win too.
[01:44:13.900 --> 01:44:18.700]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:44:18.700 --> 01:44:20.380]  civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.380 --> 01:44:25.340]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone
[01:44:25.340 --> 01:44:29.980]  calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables
[01:44:29.980 --> 01:44:33.300]  on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.300 --> 01:44:38.420]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.420 --> 01:44:40.580]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.580 --> 01:44:46.100]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:44:46.100 --> 01:44:49.100]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.100 --> 01:44:58.140]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:44:58.140 --> 01:45:00.780]  collectors now.
[01:45:00.780 --> 01:45:03.980]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.980 --> 01:45:09.220]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand
[01:45:09.220 --> 01:45:14.020]  four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.020 --> 01:45:18.940]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.940 --> 01:45:22.740]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.740 --> 01:45:27.580]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.580 --> 01:45:34.140]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.140 --> 01:45:38.820]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:38.820 --> 01:45:43.180]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.180 --> 01:45:49.340]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.340 --> 01:46:17.340]  pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:46:17.340 --> 01:46:24.340]  to subscribe.
[01:46:24.340 --> 01:46:38.020]  Okay.
[01:46:38.020 --> 01:46:39.020]  We are back.
[01:46:39.020 --> 01:46:40.020]  We're in the fountain.
[01:46:40.020 --> 01:46:43.780]  We're at Rule Law Radio and we're talking to John in New York.
[01:46:43.780 --> 01:46:45.980]  Okay, John.
[01:46:45.980 --> 01:46:46.980]  What is it?
[01:46:46.980 --> 01:46:50.260]  What do you need to know about ordinances?
[01:46:50.260 --> 01:46:51.660]  Okay.
[01:46:51.660 --> 01:46:53.940]  You mentioned that you heard from someone.
[01:46:53.940 --> 01:46:55.540]  Tell me about that.
[01:46:55.540 --> 01:46:57.300]  Oh, Jerry.
[01:46:57.300 --> 01:47:00.500]  Jerry took on the grass police in Pennsylvania.
[01:47:00.500 --> 01:47:07.540]  The grass police come onto his property and photographed his weeds, and he had no trespassing
[01:47:07.540 --> 01:47:08.540]  signs up.
[01:47:08.540 --> 01:47:13.580]  And he caught them on his property and told them to get the heck off his property, and
[01:47:13.580 --> 01:47:15.700]  they gave him a hard time.
[01:47:15.700 --> 01:47:20.420]  And then they filed charges against him based on the photographs they took while they were
[01:47:20.420 --> 01:47:23.420]  on his property.
[01:47:23.420 --> 01:47:33.580]  And he sued him in the federal court for a criminal trespass and won.
[01:47:33.580 --> 01:47:41.620]  The feds told him, you went on his property, passed his no trespassing signs without a
[01:47:41.620 --> 01:47:45.620]  warrant.
[01:47:45.620 --> 01:47:50.260]  So they reversed the ruling in the case and remanded it back.
[01:47:50.260 --> 01:47:55.260]  I bet the next time they go traipsing around and somebody says, get off my property, they're
[01:47:55.260 --> 01:47:59.020]  not going to try to convince the homeowner how important they are.
[01:47:59.020 --> 01:48:02.780]  Yeah, probably not.
[01:48:02.780 --> 01:48:07.680]  That is one of my favorite cases.
[01:48:07.680 --> 01:48:14.740]  That's even better than a traffic ticket taken to the feds.
[01:48:14.740 --> 01:48:15.740]  The grass police.
[01:48:15.740 --> 01:48:19.820]  Well, Brett, did you get my message I just sent you?
[01:48:19.820 --> 01:48:21.820]  My message?
[01:48:21.820 --> 01:48:24.540]  Oh, what way did you send it?
[01:48:24.540 --> 01:48:28.940]  I know I haven't been looking at any messages anywhere right now.
[01:48:28.940 --> 01:48:32.500]  Yeah, I sent it about five minutes ago.
[01:48:32.500 --> 01:48:33.500]  Okay.
[01:48:33.500 --> 01:48:34.500]  Anyways.
[01:48:34.500 --> 01:48:36.020]  I'll go take a look at messages.
[01:48:36.020 --> 01:48:38.220]  All right, here it is.
[01:48:38.220 --> 01:48:40.700]  Essentially, I don't want to say too much on the air.
[01:48:40.700 --> 01:48:45.340]  I just want to know what I looked at.
[01:48:45.340 --> 01:48:50.660]  You guys told me exactly where to look and I looked, I could not find the information
[01:48:50.660 --> 01:48:59.460]  that you told me to find on whether or not New York state who has authorized why as far
[01:48:59.460 --> 01:49:05.140]  as the code enforcement rules and regulations.
[01:49:05.140 --> 01:49:12.220]  And I could first place first place to look at the constitution, who does the constitution
[01:49:12.220 --> 01:49:14.300]  empower to make law?
[01:49:14.300 --> 01:49:22.500]  Well, it's the legislature, the state legislature and well, we talked to someone in Ohio, and
[01:49:22.500 --> 01:49:34.420]  it was actually in the constitution that says, you know, say that again, so in Ohio, it was
[01:49:34.420 --> 01:49:40.140]  in their constitution that cities, cities could write ordinances.
[01:49:40.140 --> 01:49:48.060]  Now, yeah, so they could write ordinances, they could write law.
[01:49:48.060 --> 01:49:55.260]  But in Texas, there is no authorization for a municipality to write law.
[01:49:55.260 --> 01:50:00.900]  So the legislature authorized them to create ordinances.
[01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:12.260]  And our argument was that if the ordinance is applied to anyone other than a employee
[01:50:12.260 --> 01:50:18.300]  of the corporation, or someone in contractual privity with the corporation, where they had
[01:50:18.300 --> 01:50:25.140]  agreed to the court to the statutory scheme, that they have tried to apply it to anybody
[01:50:25.140 --> 01:50:31.500]  else, it would have the effect of a law, and would therefore be an unconstitutional application
[01:50:31.500 --> 01:50:32.500]  of the ordinance.
[01:50:32.500 --> 01:50:33.500]  Right.
[01:50:33.500 --> 01:50:34.500]  Exactly.
[01:50:34.500 --> 01:50:37.180]  So that's the argument we're trying to bring.
[01:50:37.180 --> 01:50:42.420]  But the constitution first, and then look in the legislature.
[01:50:42.420 --> 01:50:53.580]  If the constitution did not give municipalities and counties authority to write law, and if
[01:50:53.580 --> 01:51:00.260]  the legislature gave them the authority to write ordinances, then our argument is the
[01:51:00.260 --> 01:51:08.060]  ordinance cannot be applied to the public in general, because only the legislature can
[01:51:08.060 --> 01:51:11.100]  write laws that apply to the public in general.
[01:51:11.100 --> 01:51:13.620]  Yeah, binding on the public.
[01:51:13.620 --> 01:51:17.060]  Does that make sense, John?
[01:51:17.060 --> 01:51:18.700]  Oh, yeah, yeah.
[01:51:18.700 --> 01:51:24.140]  Now, so how will that affect what I'm asking you help for?
[01:51:24.140 --> 01:51:32.220]  Will that mean that the code office can't do anything, they can't authorize, they have
[01:51:32.220 --> 01:51:34.020]  no authority to enforce?
[01:51:34.020 --> 01:51:35.740]  That's what I'm trying to say.
[01:51:35.740 --> 01:51:40.460]  They have no authority to enforce against you.
[01:51:40.460 --> 01:51:47.060]  Now, if you're a licensed professional and you've got your license from the municipality,
[01:51:47.060 --> 01:51:50.260]  that's a different thing.
[01:51:50.260 --> 01:51:57.560]  And if the application for the license, if in the application you agreed to abide by
[01:51:57.560 --> 01:52:01.900]  all city ordinances, then they can enforce against you.
[01:52:01.900 --> 01:52:02.900]  Yeah.
[01:52:02.900 --> 01:52:03.900]  Right.
[01:52:03.900 --> 01:52:04.900]  That's different.
[01:52:04.900 --> 01:52:05.900]  Obviously, that's not the case.
[01:52:05.900 --> 01:52:10.300]  So am I correct in saying, and here's the magic question, and this will answer my whole
[01:52:10.300 --> 01:52:13.620]  question, my whole problem.
[01:52:13.620 --> 01:52:22.700]  If I were to say that the code enforcement office has no authority to enforce the code
[01:52:22.700 --> 01:52:32.860]  regulations, let's see if I can remember some of the other names, rules, regulations,
[01:52:32.860 --> 01:52:39.900]  code, statutes, they just do, all the municipalities do are ordinances.
[01:52:39.900 --> 01:52:40.900]  Ordinances.
[01:52:40.900 --> 01:52:46.940]  Well, sometimes they call it code, but it's not, it can't be binding on the public unless
[01:52:46.940 --> 01:52:48.620]  the constitution allowed that.
[01:52:48.620 --> 01:52:53.340]  So you have to look and find it in the state to see if it's allowed or not.
[01:52:53.340 --> 01:52:56.340]  And so just look in the state constitution.
[01:52:56.340 --> 01:53:01.860]  And then look in the statutes that came from the legislators, because we, the people that
[01:53:01.860 --> 01:53:06.020]  are in New York, put some representatives in there to set up how the laws are going
[01:53:06.020 --> 01:53:08.420]  to be in the state of New York.
[01:53:08.420 --> 01:53:13.580]  And if they set it up that way, like almost none of them did, but which was the one that
[01:53:13.580 --> 01:53:15.220]  you found, Randy, that had?
[01:53:15.220 --> 01:53:16.220]  Ohio.
[01:53:16.220 --> 01:53:17.220]  Ohio.
[01:53:17.220 --> 01:53:22.340]  So if New York is like Ohio, then you're stuck with that.
[01:53:22.340 --> 01:53:25.380]  You need to go to your legislators and tell them to fix it.
[01:53:25.380 --> 01:53:31.180]  But if it's like most of the states, then these guys that are writing ordinances have
[01:53:31.180 --> 01:53:34.140]  no business trying to apply them to you.
[01:53:34.140 --> 01:53:35.140]  Right.
[01:53:35.140 --> 01:53:36.140]  All right.
[01:53:36.140 --> 01:53:43.300]  And, and, and what's the, and this whole thing is whether or not the legislature or
[01:53:43.300 --> 01:53:45.300]  the state constitution.
[01:53:45.300 --> 01:53:49.540]  Okay, hold on, John, hold on.
[01:53:49.540 --> 01:53:50.540]  Yeah.
[01:53:50.540 --> 01:53:55.740]  It hinges on what the constitution allows, not what the legislature allows.
[01:53:55.740 --> 01:54:04.340]  What we're saying is if the constitution only authorized the legislature to write law
[01:54:04.340 --> 01:54:12.020]  and did not authorize the legislature to delegate its authority to write law, then it can't
[01:54:12.020 --> 01:54:14.700]  delegate that authority.
[01:54:14.700 --> 01:54:15.700]  Right.
[01:54:15.700 --> 01:54:22.900]  In Texas, only the legislature can write law binding on the people.
[01:54:22.900 --> 01:54:25.900]  Period.
[01:54:25.900 --> 01:54:32.020]  They allowed, they authorized municipalities and counties to issue ordinances, but they
[01:54:32.020 --> 01:54:40.700]  could not bind those on the people because then it would have the effect of a law and
[01:54:40.700 --> 01:54:45.380]  writing law is not a power the legislature can delegate.
[01:54:45.380 --> 01:54:47.380]  Right.
[01:54:47.380 --> 01:54:52.900]  And so even in New York, they cannot delegate that, is that correct?
[01:54:52.900 --> 01:54:54.320]  I don't know.
[01:54:54.320 --> 01:54:56.620]  What does the New York constitution say?
[01:54:56.620 --> 01:54:57.620]  Right.
[01:54:57.620 --> 01:54:58.620]  You gotta find it.
[01:54:58.620 --> 01:55:03.300]  Okay, it hinges on what the constitution in New York allows.
[01:55:03.300 --> 01:55:07.260]  That's the whole, the whole crux.
[01:55:07.260 --> 01:55:08.260]  Yes.
[01:55:08.260 --> 01:55:09.260]  Okay.
[01:55:09.260 --> 01:55:17.700]  And when you can, when you can, when you can, Brett, take a look at your text messages.
[01:55:17.700 --> 01:55:19.100]  I explained a few things in there.
[01:55:19.100 --> 01:55:23.500]  I didn't want to go into it on the air, but I explained a couple of things there.
[01:55:23.500 --> 01:55:24.500]  Okay.
[01:55:24.500 --> 01:55:29.900]  Read your text messages and see what you can do to answer and cause I know you guys are
[01:55:29.900 --> 01:55:30.900]  busy.
[01:55:30.900 --> 01:55:31.900]  Okay.
[01:55:31.900 --> 01:55:34.900]  Thank you, John.
[01:55:34.900 --> 01:55:37.180]  We've got one more caller.
[01:55:37.180 --> 01:55:40.300]  We got Ted's back from California.
[01:55:40.300 --> 01:55:42.700]  Hello, Ted.
[01:55:42.700 --> 01:55:45.100]  What do you have for us now?
[01:55:45.100 --> 01:55:51.180]  Well, this goes to Mike in Tennessee, but it does go to everyone.
[01:55:51.180 --> 01:56:00.100]  And you know, Randy, from time to time, we don't appreciate or forget how it all started
[01:56:00.100 --> 01:56:05.580]  and for us and each is, you know, a personal story.
[01:56:05.580 --> 01:56:11.860]  But what I got out of Mike, number one, Mike seems like a very intelligent guy.
[01:56:11.860 --> 01:56:17.820]  He seems to know a little bit of law, know a little bit of procedure, but number one
[01:56:17.820 --> 01:56:22.580]  thing, Randy, cause you've got a tough shell, you got a turtle shell.
[01:56:22.580 --> 01:56:25.380]  Mike is traumatized right now.
[01:56:25.380 --> 01:56:26.380]  Okay.
[01:56:26.380 --> 01:56:30.420]  And he's trying to get back up on his feet.
[01:56:30.420 --> 01:56:37.260]  And so he's doing exactly the kind of thing I did from time to time calling in and everybody
[01:56:37.260 --> 01:56:43.460]  needs to know that yes, this suck.
[01:56:43.460 --> 01:56:45.060]  Okay.
[01:56:45.060 --> 01:56:47.420]  And you've got two choices.
[01:56:47.420 --> 01:56:57.120]  Buck it up and move along or hunker down and learn law procedure and the court.
[01:56:57.120 --> 01:57:05.540]  And if you want to shine the light of the corruption in the probate court, then one
[01:57:05.540 --> 01:57:08.420]  step at a time.
[01:57:08.420 --> 01:57:14.740]  I also think people come on and they think they can have one conversation on this show
[01:57:14.740 --> 01:57:17.780]  and get their problems fixed.
[01:57:17.780 --> 01:57:19.980]  That's not how it works.
[01:57:19.980 --> 01:57:23.580]  It's going to be a thousand paper cut.
[01:57:23.580 --> 01:57:26.220]  Everything is paper.
[01:57:26.220 --> 01:57:28.780]  Everything you get into the court.
[01:57:28.780 --> 01:57:33.700]  So I feel for Mike and I don't know, I don't know if he reached out to me.
[01:57:33.700 --> 01:57:40.620]  I certainly didn't see it or I would have responded, but just keep in mind, Randy, because
[01:57:40.620 --> 01:57:47.820]  you're past all that and you, you tossed out a few bitter pills tonight and if, if people
[01:57:47.820 --> 01:57:53.340]  have to take them with a shot of tequila, I recommend they do because reality is reality.
[01:57:53.340 --> 01:57:58.820]  And the only way we're going to change this is one pleading filing at a time.
[01:57:58.820 --> 01:58:04.700]  And remember at the civil or the first level, all you're doing is creating a record for
[01:58:04.700 --> 01:58:05.700]  appeal.
[01:58:05.700 --> 01:58:16.300]  Okay, if I came off sounding like I was trying to give Mike a hard time, it wasn't my intention.
[01:58:16.300 --> 01:58:19.700]  I was expecting that he had some issue.
[01:58:19.700 --> 01:58:25.620]  It sounded like he was just calling and was complaining and I was trying to get to something
[01:58:25.620 --> 01:58:28.860]  a little more focused than just complaining.
[01:58:28.860 --> 01:58:33.500]  Mike if you felt like I was heavy handed, it was not my intention.
[01:58:33.500 --> 01:58:36.100]  I'm not Eddie Craig.
[01:58:36.100 --> 01:58:39.460]  Okay, thank you all for listening.
[01:58:39.460 --> 01:58:46.100]  We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour eco-marathon and we'll be taking the calls
[01:58:46.100 --> 01:58:47.100]  all night.
[01:58:47.100 --> 01:58:50.220]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.220 --> 01:58:56.300]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.300 --> 01:58:57.500]  recovery version.
[01:58:57.500 --> 01:59:02.460]  The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.460 --> 01:59:08.140]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.140 --> 01:59:11.420]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.420 --> 01:59:20.400]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.400 --> 01:59:25.920]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus
[01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:29.940]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.940 --> 01:59:32.500]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.500 --> 01:59:40.860]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.860 --> 01:59:59.220]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.