ROL_2023-04-07_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.320]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.320 --> 00:09.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.360 --> 00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.760 --> 00:16.840]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.840 --> 00:18.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.440 --> 00:22.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.040 --> 00:26.800]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.800 --> 00:31.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.880 --> 00:34.560]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.560 --> 00:38.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:38.840 --> 00:42.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.400 --> 00:44.720]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.720 --> 00:47.680]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.680 --> 00:50.720]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.720 --> 00:54.360]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.360 --> 01:01.480]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.480 --> 01:02.840]  and R for religion.
[01:02.840 --> 01:06.920]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.920 --> 01:10.760]  assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.760 --> 01:14.480]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.480 --> 01:18.000]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.680]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.680 --> 01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:34.640]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.640 --> 01:38.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.120 --> 01:39.560]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.560 --> 01:43.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.480 --> 01:46.620]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.620 --> 01:48.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.200 --> 01:51.800]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.800 --> 01:56.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.600 --> 02:01.720]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.720 --> 02:04.360]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.360 --> 02:08.640]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.640 --> 02:12.160]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.160 --> 02:15.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.760 --> 02:20.120]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.120 --> 02:22.180]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.180 --> 02:26.680]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.680 --> 02:30.520]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.520 --> 02:31.520]  Get it?
[02:31.520 --> 02:33.840]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.840 --> 02:37.440]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.440 --> 02:38.440]  when he said,
[02:38.440 --> 02:43.600]  "...the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.600 --> 02:48.680]  and more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically
[02:48.680 --> 02:50.520]  has proved to always be possible."
[02:50.520 --> 02:52.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.320 --> 03:15.960]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:23.320 --> 03:47.360]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[03:47.360 --> 04:05.200]  and more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which
[04:05.200 --> 04:20.720]  now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which
[04:20.720 --> 04:46.520]  now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America.
[04:46.520 --> 04:47.520]  Howdy, howdy.
[04:47.520 --> 04:55.100]  Randy Caltin, Brett Fountain, Root of Love Radio on this, the seventh day of April, 2023.
[04:55.100 --> 04:59.240]  This Friday, info, four-hour info marathon.
[04:59.240 --> 05:03.760]  And Brett, what do you have for us to start?
[05:03.760 --> 05:10.320]  Well, I'll tell you what's the top of mind for me right now.
[05:10.320 --> 05:18.960]  I met yesterday, like I said, with someone who got thrown in jail and, you know, we get
[05:18.960 --> 05:20.500]  all these calls.
[05:20.500 --> 05:24.360]  Sometimes we don't really know exactly how much weight to put on different ones, right?
[05:24.360 --> 05:28.520]  Because everybody's story is so terrible and so dramatic.
[05:28.520 --> 05:32.560]  And sometimes it's hard to know what's the rest of the story.
[05:32.560 --> 05:39.880]  Well, in this particular story, the guy that's in jail, he's been there today, was his
[05:39.880 --> 05:47.760]  29th day to be behind bars, actually moved him to maximum security.
[05:47.760 --> 05:54.680]  And what he's accused of doing is stalking a judge.
[05:54.680 --> 05:59.200]  And he has no idea what they're talking about.
[05:59.200 --> 06:10.440]  So the best we can piece together so far is that he had emailed some letter to a judge
[06:10.440 --> 06:15.640]  and they took something like out of context from there, grabbed a little snippet out of
[06:15.640 --> 06:25.940]  it and they said that he, some police report says that he emailed and visited the judge's
[06:25.940 --> 06:29.720]  residence and posted the same letter on the door.
[06:29.720 --> 06:35.960]  And it's some kind of a death threat and he doesn't even have a clue what are they talking
[06:35.960 --> 06:36.960]  about?
[06:36.960 --> 06:37.960]  Death threat?
[06:37.960 --> 06:38.960]  What?
[06:38.960 --> 06:45.880]  So, you know, it sounds really awful when you just see the police report, but sometimes
[06:45.880 --> 06:48.720]  the police are telling the truth.
[06:48.720 --> 07:01.800]  Surely the judge has a video on his door and they have this on video and surely they have
[07:01.800 --> 07:09.200]  a copy of this threat and have compared it to his handwriting and it matches his handwriting.
[07:09.200 --> 07:10.200]  Surely.
[07:10.200 --> 07:17.120]  I have a feeling they've got nothing.
[07:17.120 --> 07:21.480]  So let me feed you another piece of the puzzle.
[07:21.480 --> 07:28.160]  This guy that's in jail had just finished pumping out a slew of criminal complaints
[07:28.160 --> 07:33.920]  and he was about to get around to this guy.
[07:33.920 --> 07:38.760]  This guy just knew that he was coming up next or whatever.
[07:38.760 --> 07:44.280]  So he went ahead and, well, this is conjecture at this point, but I'm thinking what happened
[07:44.280 --> 08:00.400]  is the guy that put him in jail did so to prevent the citizen from reporting any more
[08:00.400 --> 08:01.400]  of these crimes.
[08:01.400 --> 08:06.840]  It's just too much trouble for him and his colleagues to get too many of these reports.
[08:06.840 --> 08:07.840]  It's embarrassing.
[08:07.840 --> 08:16.840]  So maybe he needs somebody else to file these complaints for him.
[08:16.840 --> 08:21.200]  Yeah.
[08:21.200 --> 08:28.680]  So what I did is I came up with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and sent it to
[08:28.680 --> 08:35.440]  all nine of the judges of the highest court, the highest criminal court, and we'll see
[08:35.440 --> 08:37.040]  what they want to do with it.
[08:37.040 --> 08:44.720]  I have a feeling they're going to do the same thing with it at first that they did with
[08:44.720 --> 08:50.600]  mine for me, which was to just sit on it, not rule either way, not issue a writ, not
[08:50.600 --> 08:55.880]  do anything, just because that's what they tend to want to do.
[08:55.880 --> 08:56.880]  Just quiet.
[08:56.880 --> 09:06.160]  And if they have any hearing of any kind before the habeas, then you get to file against them.
[09:06.160 --> 09:11.760]  Well, my plan is over the weekend, I will finish up.
[09:11.760 --> 09:20.000]  You remember I said I was going to go ahead and report those nine because I had them on
[09:20.000 --> 09:25.860]  bank denying to issue the writ of habeas corpus.
[09:25.860 --> 09:31.440]  So I'm going to make sure I get those criminal complaints out.
[09:31.440 --> 09:37.920]  Before Monday morning, 10 o'clock, he has a hearing they've scheduled where they're
[09:37.920 --> 09:47.720]  trying to do a motion for bond reduction is how they interpreted the previous habeas attempt.
[09:47.720 --> 09:51.720]  They don't want to give him a habeas remedy because then they'd have to prove up that
[09:51.720 --> 09:55.920]  they got him in there according to due process and they can't do that.
[09:55.920 --> 09:59.880]  So they're going to reduce his, they're going to have a motion hearing to see about
[09:59.880 --> 10:04.440]  reducing his bond.
[10:04.440 --> 10:06.120]  That's kind of the same thing, right?
[10:06.120 --> 10:07.120]  Yeah.
[10:07.120 --> 10:14.280]  Well, no, as a matter of fact, it's not.
[10:14.280 --> 10:17.960]  Anyway, yep.
[10:17.960 --> 10:20.680]  That's what's on top of my mind right now.
[10:20.680 --> 10:26.960]  So Monday, so I'm sure we can get the guy from Hillsborough down there.
[10:26.960 --> 10:28.760]  I'll see if I can be down there.
[10:28.760 --> 10:30.480]  That'd be great.
[10:30.480 --> 10:31.480]  Yep.
[10:31.480 --> 10:35.840]  I'm going to see if we can fill the courtroom.
[10:35.840 --> 10:38.280]  Dr. Joe's here with me.
[10:38.280 --> 10:43.160]  Dr. Joe, you want to go to court Monday?
[10:43.160 --> 10:49.400]  We'll get some, we may be getting Glenn Fern.
[10:49.400 --> 10:55.960]  I've got a few people who are not the best friends of the court and have some experience
[10:55.960 --> 10:56.960]  in this area.
[10:56.960 --> 11:00.560]  Maybe we can get a courtroom full.
[11:00.560 --> 11:04.560]  Folks taking notes and watching everybody like a hawk.
[11:04.560 --> 11:06.600]  Yep.
[11:06.600 --> 11:09.880]  That's generally what it takes when they got people looking over their shoulder, that makes
[11:09.880 --> 11:17.240]  a big difference because they're used to being in an empty courtroom and accustomed to doing
[11:17.240 --> 11:18.720]  anything they want to.
[11:18.720 --> 11:19.720]  Yeah.
[11:19.720 --> 11:20.720]  With nobody watching.
[11:20.720 --> 11:28.320]  We'll get on telegram and see if we can stir up a few more interested people.
[11:28.320 --> 11:38.040]  I still remember that hearing we went to for Scott Richardson in Round Rock and the best
[11:38.040 --> 11:43.080]  one there was your son when he urinated on their grass.
[11:43.080 --> 11:50.760]  It was all in pure innocence.
[11:50.760 --> 11:53.520]  He didn't know the other meaning of what that is.
[11:53.520 --> 11:59.040]  He just thought he's just taking care of what he needs to, but for those of us that recognize
[11:59.040 --> 12:02.480]  the secondary meaning, it was perfect.
[12:02.480 --> 12:07.520]  Yeah, that was great.
[12:07.520 --> 12:12.120]  But yeah, I think we need to see how many people we can get down there.
[12:12.120 --> 12:18.040]  Somebody listening near East Dallas.
[12:18.040 --> 12:21.640]  How far is it to Athens from Dallas?
[12:21.640 --> 12:25.240]  I imagine it's an hour.
[12:25.240 --> 12:37.640]  For me, it'll be about two hours, but anyone who's in the area, this might make for some
[12:37.640 --> 12:40.640]  really serious entertainment.
[12:40.640 --> 12:49.320]  And do you have the complaints that he was intending to file?
[12:49.320 --> 12:54.320]  I have a pile of them here and I haven't looked through every one of them, but I've skimmed
[12:54.320 --> 13:05.200]  around and I don't know which ones were already filed and it'll take a little figuring out.
[13:05.200 --> 13:06.200]  Well, who cares?
[13:06.200 --> 13:09.200]  We'll file them again.
[13:09.200 --> 13:16.280]  We'll ask if there has been a warrant issued on any of these complaints.
[13:16.280 --> 13:18.720]  If not, then we'll file them.
[13:18.720 --> 13:21.960]  I'll be glad to file them.
[13:21.960 --> 13:27.680]  If there hasn't been a warrant issued on the complaint and it has been filed, then we'd
[13:27.680 --> 13:32.760]  prepare a complaint against the judge for not issuing a warrant.
[13:32.760 --> 13:34.320]  Exactly.
[13:34.320 --> 13:42.120]  Seeing these guys a firestorm, they can't arrest everybody for threatening the judge.
[13:42.120 --> 13:48.720]  And then we file against the judge for retaliation.
[13:48.720 --> 13:58.280]  He has a whole stack of complaints filed and none of those complaints contain threats against
[13:58.280 --> 14:02.260]  the individuals complained of.
[14:02.260 --> 14:09.600]  So all of a sudden he's threatening a judge, I don't know, who is the judge he supposedly
[14:09.600 --> 14:10.600]  threatened?
[14:10.600 --> 14:18.320]  I think that's Judge Perryman, P-E-R-R-Y-M-A-N.
[14:18.320 --> 14:31.120]  And it's really interesting because they arrested this guy on March 10 and March 9, after hours,
[14:31.120 --> 14:40.240]  a couple of county officials, investigator for the county attorney, they got together
[14:40.240 --> 14:52.440]  and brought this report to the magistrate, to District Judge Moore, M-O-O-R-E, brought
[14:52.440 --> 14:54.440]  this to him at 6-10 p.m.
[14:54.440 --> 15:02.960]  I don't know exactly how that works, but at 6-10 p.m. this district judge found probable
[15:02.960 --> 15:10.720]  cause without a hearing, without even one minute worth of consideration, and in spite
[15:10.720 --> 15:18.760]  of the fact that the allegations of fact don't line up with all the elements of any offense,
[15:18.760 --> 15:25.660]  there is no offense that would be triggered by just that many facts.
[15:25.660 --> 15:37.380]  We can't raise that issue, because the way I read 15.09, in Texas the judge has no standing
[15:37.380 --> 15:44.440]  to make a determination of probable cause, he is commanded to issue that warrant.
[15:44.440 --> 15:47.480]  If it meets all the requirements of a complaint.
[15:47.480 --> 15:51.760]  Yeah, exactly, in accordance with 15.05.
[15:51.760 --> 15:52.760]  Right.
[15:52.760 --> 16:03.760]  If it doesn't meet all the requirements of a complaint, then he doesn't have his duty
[16:03.760 --> 16:05.760]  triggered.
[16:05.760 --> 16:07.480]  Excuse me.
[16:07.480 --> 16:13.600]  If it doesn't meet the requisites of a complaint, then we file a complaint against him for issuing
[16:13.600 --> 16:14.600]  the complaint.
[16:14.600 --> 16:15.600]  The warrant, right.
[16:15.600 --> 16:27.200]  And we don't want him to misconstrue, so here we are, right in front of you, filing the
[16:27.200 --> 16:32.560]  complaints, and if we file against one judge, we just go to the next judge and file with
[16:32.560 --> 16:33.560]  that one.
[16:33.560 --> 16:41.280]  I've been doing that here in Victoria County, and I've got about 15 criminal complaints
[16:41.280 --> 16:43.280]  against him at the moment.
[16:43.280 --> 16:55.840]  Actually, it's 30, because each time I file a complaint with a magistrate, and he doesn't
[16:55.840 --> 17:00.200]  issue warrants on all those complaints.
[17:00.200 --> 17:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[17:04.880 --> 17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras proven method.
[17:09.000 --> 17:13.280]  Michael Mirras, and now you
[17:13.280 --> 17:14.280]  can win two.
[17:14.280 --> 17:19.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.120 --> 17:25.000]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:25.000 --> 17:29.520]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[17:29.520 --> 17:33.720]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.720 --> 17:38.840]  The Michael Mirras.
[17:38.840 --> 17:40.760]  Final consultation is available as well.
[17:40.760 --> 17:46.600]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner,
[17:46.600 --> 17:49.480]  or email [email protected].
[17:49.480 --> 17:58.480]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[17:58.480 --> 18:00.480]  collectors now.
[18:00.480 --> 18:04.600]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[18:04.600 --> 18:08.400]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[18:08.400 --> 18:12.200]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.200 --> 18:15.560]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.560 --> 18:19.240]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.240 --> 18:23.440]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.440 --> 18:24.880]  our rights through due process.
[18:24.880 --> 18:28.800]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.800 --> 18:32.580]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.580 --> 18:34.960]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.960 --> 18:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.000 --> 18:40.320]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.320 --> 18:43.680]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.680 --> 18:48.080]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.080 --> 18:50.400]  documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.400 --> 18:54.360]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.360 --> 18:58.640]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:58.640 --> 19:08.320]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:28.640 --> 19:43.200]  The world is spinning like it's out of control, on the edge of a hole, inside a deep dark
[19:43.200 --> 19:44.200]  bone.
[19:44.200 --> 19:49.200]  I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul.
[19:49.200 --> 20:03.760]  That's how I sit back and I watch the evidence unfold, and I see justice is the goal, yeah,
[20:03.760 --> 20:07.760]  justice is the goal.
[20:07.760 --> 20:15.760]  Sometimes we sail a little too far at sea, and then we're in the hands of our foes.
[20:15.760 --> 20:25.840]  I'm Brett Fountain, ruleoflawradio, and we have the call boards on, call in number 512-646-1984.
[20:25.840 --> 20:33.800]  And if anybody is interested in showing up, if you're anywhere around East Texas, and
[20:33.800 --> 20:38.880]  you want to show up at this hearing, it would be a big party.
[20:38.880 --> 20:45.040]  So if you want to show up, send me an email or send Brett an email, and we'll get the
[20:45.040 --> 20:46.040]  exact directions.
[20:46.040 --> 20:49.640]  Brett, this is the courthouse in Athens, isn't it?
[20:49.640 --> 20:51.680]  Yes, Athens, Texas.
[20:51.680 --> 20:53.480]  It's Henderson County, I believe.
[20:53.480 --> 20:57.920]  I'm not sure if it's going to be a district court or county court, but I'll find out
[20:57.920 --> 20:58.920]  about that.
[20:58.920 --> 21:05.120]  It is about one hour, nine minutes southeast of downtown Dallas.
[21:05.120 --> 21:12.400]  Okay, so if anybody's interested, let us know, and we'll see if we can't get a good big
[21:12.400 --> 21:13.400]  party going.
[21:13.400 --> 21:16.120]  Okay, let's go to our callers.
[21:16.120 --> 21:20.680]  All right, so the first one we've got here is Jill in Oregon.
[21:20.680 --> 21:22.240]  Good evening, Jill.
[21:22.240 --> 21:24.440]  Sorry, we couldn't get to you last night.
[21:24.440 --> 21:27.080]  Glad you called in tonight.
[21:27.080 --> 21:29.480]  Thank you.
[21:29.480 --> 21:31.680]  So I was calling.
[21:31.680 --> 21:35.800]  Should I give a background of my case before I continue?
[21:35.800 --> 21:41.560]  Yeah, just a brief overview to kind of catch everybody up.
[21:41.560 --> 21:49.120]  So I was a teacher in Oregon who was fired because of the VAX mandate, and I was planning
[21:49.120 --> 21:54.560]  on suing everyone from Kate Brown, the governor, on down.
[21:54.560 --> 21:59.720]  Last year I called in, and Randy suggested that I first file a petition for declaratory
[21:59.720 --> 22:07.200]  judgment against the—I decided to file it against the health authority who was the one
[22:07.200 --> 22:11.720]  who adopted the VAX rule.
[22:11.720 --> 22:20.400]  So I did that, and what happened was the attorney general was able to get it moved to the Court
[22:20.400 --> 22:27.000]  of Appeals, which has jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedures Act.
[22:27.000 --> 22:35.160]  The problem is that I was asking the court to rule whether or not the health authority
[22:35.160 --> 22:39.600]  acted out of scope when they adopted the rule.
[22:39.600 --> 22:46.360]  What's happening now is the Court of Appeals has changed my suit into an APA, the Administrative
[22:46.360 --> 22:55.120]  Procedures Act suit, where court judicial review is limited and where they can only
[22:55.120 --> 22:58.120]  rule to invalidate the rule.
[22:58.120 --> 22:59.120]  Oh, wow.
[22:59.120 --> 23:01.120]  So the Court of Appeals has changed—
[23:01.120 --> 23:03.080]  How do they change it, Randy?
[23:03.080 --> 23:09.920]  How do they get any kind of authority to change the nature of the claim and move it to a different
[23:09.920 --> 23:10.920]  kind of claim?
[23:10.920 --> 23:20.600]  So basically, the AG has managed to twist my words, and I had already disputed that
[23:20.600 --> 23:23.520]  that's not what I wanted.
[23:23.520 --> 23:28.480]  And I suspect that the county court, which is the court of record judge, understood what
[23:28.480 --> 23:36.120]  I was saying, but he didn't want to have the hot potato on his hands, so he transferred
[23:36.120 --> 23:42.720]  the case to the Court of Appeals for subject matter jurisdiction review, which he can under
[23:42.720 --> 23:45.080]  state law.
[23:45.080 --> 23:51.480]  So the Court of Appeals then took what the AG wrote, saying that I sought to invalidate
[23:51.480 --> 23:58.880]  the rule and exerted subject matter jurisdiction over the case, saying it is an APA case and
[23:58.880 --> 24:03.400]  not a declaratory judgment case.
[24:03.400 --> 24:11.960]  I petitioned for reconsideration, seeking clarification on how they had the authority
[24:11.960 --> 24:23.440]  to change my suit, because that was not what I was seeking, and they outright denied my
[24:23.440 --> 24:28.760]  motion for clarification without findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[24:28.760 --> 24:29.760]  Then I called in.
[24:29.760 --> 24:36.840]  Randy suggested that I file a writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Appeals to give me
[24:36.840 --> 24:38.720]  the findings of fact.
[24:38.720 --> 24:45.520]  Yesterday, the Supreme Court has denied my motion for findings of fact.
[24:45.520 --> 24:50.360]  So it's been thrown back to the Court of Appeals as an APA case.
[24:50.360 --> 24:55.400]  How can that be denied?
[24:55.400 --> 25:01.040]  That request for findings and conclusions is supposed to get you the facts and law on
[25:01.040 --> 25:04.120]  which they already relied.
[25:04.120 --> 25:06.840]  How is that something they get to deny?
[25:06.840 --> 25:13.920]  Have you considered a suit in the federal court?
[25:13.920 --> 25:20.960]  I've actually filed my main suit against everyone in federal court because my 90 days for the
[25:20.960 --> 25:27.040]  Title VII civil rights section of my suit is ticking.
[25:27.040 --> 25:29.640]  So I filed my main case in federal court.
[25:29.640 --> 25:38.800]  So I'm almost thinking of motioning to dismiss this case without prejudice, because getting
[25:38.800 --> 25:44.040]  the rule invalidated is not what I'm looking for.
[25:44.040 --> 25:45.040]  And at this point-
[25:45.040 --> 25:48.040]  So would that be a non-suit?
[25:48.040 --> 25:52.280]  So which one would be a non-suit?
[25:52.280 --> 25:59.320]  Well, the problem with that is it's already a ruling.
[25:59.320 --> 26:06.360]  And it may be too late to dismiss, to non-suit the case.
[26:06.360 --> 26:12.480]  If the state has denied you due process, it might be more appropriate to charge the state
[26:12.480 --> 26:16.840]  and the Fed with denial of due process.
[26:16.840 --> 26:17.840]  That's what I'm thinking.
[26:17.840 --> 26:24.760]  So I'm thinking of motioning to dismiss because they haven't ruled on the case, the invalidation
[26:24.760 --> 26:25.760]  of the rule at this point.
[26:25.760 --> 26:32.720]  I'm supposed to file an appeals brief, basically changing my case altogether if I file an appeals
[26:32.720 --> 26:34.080]  brief in the court of appeals.
[26:34.080 --> 26:42.520]  You have to tell them you can't file an appellate brief because you don't know what to brief.
[26:42.520 --> 26:51.840]  You have not been instructed as to the facts and law that the court used to make this determination.
[26:51.840 --> 26:58.160]  So that has the effect of denying you and your remedy to a denial of due process.
[26:58.160 --> 27:05.000]  You might petition the federal court to order the state court to follow its own law.
[27:05.000 --> 27:08.480]  That's what mandamus is for.
[27:08.480 --> 27:11.840]  So should I motion to dismiss or should I just say-
[27:11.840 --> 27:16.160]  No, no, no, no, no, don't dismiss.
[27:16.160 --> 27:25.880]  I motion a petition for writ of mandamus asking the federal court to order the state court
[27:25.880 --> 27:32.880]  to provide you with findings of fact and conclusions at law because you have a right to a reasonable
[27:32.880 --> 27:36.600]  expectation of due process.
[27:36.600 --> 27:41.920]  And they're ruling against you without telling you why they ruled against you denies you
[27:41.920 --> 27:48.000]  and your right to appeal because you have no idea of what to appeal.
[27:48.000 --> 27:49.000]  Right.
[27:49.000 --> 27:58.440]  Because right now my appeals brief for under the APA is due, I don't know, probably in
[27:58.440 --> 28:00.560]  10 days.
[28:00.560 --> 28:07.600]  And I don't know if I have time to file a mandamus in federal to stop that.
[28:07.600 --> 28:15.160]  Okay, file a motion with this court asking for a stay of proceedings to give you time
[28:15.160 --> 28:18.320]  to file a writ of mandamus in the federal court.
[28:18.320 --> 28:19.320]  Okay.
[28:19.320 --> 28:23.240]  That's kind of giving them fair warning.
[28:23.240 --> 28:24.240]  Okay.
[28:24.240 --> 28:31.040]  Then if I file a writ of mandamus with federal court, do I just do it in the regular, in
[28:31.040 --> 28:32.040]  my district?
[28:32.040 --> 28:33.040]  Yes.
[28:33.040 --> 28:34.040]  Basically?
[28:34.040 --> 28:35.040]  Okay.
[28:35.040 --> 28:36.040]  Okay.
[28:36.040 --> 28:45.880]  That's a jerk or not in their high knees.
[28:45.880 --> 28:48.480]  Now you notice that this is public radio.
[28:48.480 --> 28:57.520]  So I did not say anus rectum in the vernacular because we would never say anus rectum in
[28:57.520 --> 28:58.520]  the vernacular.
[28:58.520 --> 28:59.520]  Right, Brett?
[28:59.520 --> 29:04.520]  That's a whole lot of words.
[29:04.520 --> 29:08.800]  Brett is going to get after me, so let me get Brett in the middle of it.
[29:08.800 --> 29:09.800]  Yeah.
[29:09.800 --> 29:15.680]  Okay, yeah, but that's what I do, see if you could force them to have to look at the federal
[29:15.680 --> 29:16.680]  court.
[29:16.680 --> 29:17.680]  Okay.
[29:17.680 --> 29:19.520]  This is a pretty serious issue.
[29:19.520 --> 29:24.000]  They're just saying, no, we're not going to follow law and we're not going to tell you
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000]  why we didn't follow law, deal with it.
[29:27.000 --> 29:30.200]  Right, and they just changed what I was saying.
[29:30.200 --> 29:34.640]  So I mean, and I explained that they changed it and I wanted to know why and how they could
[29:34.640 --> 29:36.640]  do that, but they're just-
[29:36.640 --> 29:41.760]  We'll ask the federal court to order them to tell you that.
[29:41.760 --> 29:49.560]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Law Radio, I'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[29:49.560 --> 29:52.560]  We'll be right back.
[29:52.560 --> 30:05.960]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:05.960 --> 30:06.960]  affected our health?
[30:06.960 --> 30:11.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how
[30:11.120 --> 30:15.440]  cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.440 --> 30:17.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.040 --> 30:20.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.640 --> 30:25.400]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.400 --> 30:30.440]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.440 --> 30:33.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.160 --> 30:37.440]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.440 --> 30:41.000]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.760 --> 30:49.000]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy, it's a fact, but whether it's dangerous to have
[30:49.000 --> 30:52.840]  a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed.
[30:52.840 --> 30:56.880]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:56.880 --> 31:01.320]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[31:01.320 --> 31:02.600]  affect brain chemistry.
[31:02.600 --> 31:07.940]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:07.940 --> 31:11.640]  to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:11.640 --> 31:15.880]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[31:15.880 --> 31:16.880]  chances.
[31:16.880 --> 31:20.120]  I just keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:20.120 --> 31:30.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.400 --> 31:31.400]  I lost my son.
[31:31.400 --> 31:32.400]  My nephew.
[31:32.400 --> 31:33.400]  My uncle.
[31:33.400 --> 31:34.400]  My son.
[31:34.400 --> 31:35.400]  On September 11th, 2001.
[31:35.400 --> 31:38.680]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.680 --> 31:42.800]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.800 --> 31:48.640]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[31:48.640 --> 31:52.400]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.400 --> 31:55.480]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:55.480 --> 31:57.760]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.760 --> 32:01.600]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.600 --> 32:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:06.000 --> 32:07.000]  Word?
[32:07.000 --> 32:12.120]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[32:12.120 --> 32:18.520]  Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:18.520 --> 32:23.040]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[32:23.040 --> 32:25.480]  dividing the word of truth.
[32:25.480 --> 32:29.440]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse
[32:29.440 --> 32:32.760]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[32:32.760 --> 32:37.400]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:37.400 --> 32:39.760]  and Christian character development.
[32:39.760 --> 32:44.280]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.280 --> 32:48.600]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:48.600 --> 32:50.880]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:50.880 --> 32:57.520]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[32:57.520 --> 33:00.120]  motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[33:00.120 --> 33:10.120]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[33:30.120 --> 33:54.120]  We're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[33:54.120 --> 34:22.120]  We're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[34:22.120 --> 34:26.160]  Okay, we are back.
[34:26.160 --> 34:28.480]  This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton.
[34:28.480 --> 34:34.400]  I'm Brett Fountain on this 7th of April, 2023.
[34:34.400 --> 34:37.600]  And we've just had a good call from Jill in Oregon.
[34:37.600 --> 34:38.600]  Thanks for calling, Jill.
[34:38.600 --> 34:42.000]  And now we're going to go to the next caller, Chris in New York.
[34:42.000 --> 34:43.320]  Good evening, Chris.
[34:43.320 --> 34:44.320]  What's on your mind?
[34:44.320 --> 34:52.400]  What's on my mind is I'm having some problems with the Bar Grievance Committee.
[34:52.400 --> 34:54.440]  I'm on my...
[34:54.440 --> 34:59.360]  I filed my civil complaint in federal court in September.
[34:59.360 --> 35:06.440]  I successfully did two bar grievances after they were returned, that they weren't going
[35:06.440 --> 35:07.680]  to investigate them.
[35:07.680 --> 35:16.680]  Sent out my third one in November, or towards the end of November, and here we are April.
[35:16.680 --> 35:19.680]  And I still haven't got the return on the letter.
[35:19.680 --> 35:25.280]  I called in January and talked to the chief investigator.
[35:25.280 --> 35:32.160]  She told me that it just got missed and that she was going to get it right out.
[35:32.160 --> 35:33.960]  Here comes February.
[35:33.960 --> 35:36.040]  I still don't get it.
[35:36.040 --> 35:44.800]  I call her back and she tells me once again that she gives me a bunch of excuses on how
[35:44.800 --> 35:54.960]  they don't have to investigate something that's intertwined with an ongoing judicial matter.
[35:54.960 --> 35:55.960]  Because the case is...
[35:55.960 --> 35:59.240]  It's an ongoing case.
[35:59.240 --> 36:02.120]  And she never said that she was going to return anything.
[36:02.120 --> 36:05.320]  I called her back and then we're going to get it.
[36:05.320 --> 36:06.320]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[36:06.320 --> 36:07.320]  I have a question.
[36:07.320 --> 36:10.320]  Yeah, me too.
[36:10.320 --> 36:13.320]  Does she have a bar card?
[36:13.320 --> 36:20.360]  Unfortunately, no, Randy, or I'm sorry, yeah, Randy, no, she doesn't.
[36:20.360 --> 36:32.520]  Then who is in her direct line of supervisors, what's the first one that does have a bar
[36:32.520 --> 36:33.520]  card?
[36:33.520 --> 36:36.480]  Oh, that would be the district council.
[36:36.480 --> 36:37.480]  Good.
[36:37.480 --> 36:47.760]  Bargrieve him for failure to train and properly train and supervise.
[36:47.760 --> 36:50.600]  That jerk is not in there.
[36:50.600 --> 36:53.280]  Can I say Hiney?
[36:53.280 --> 36:54.280]  In their donkey.
[36:54.280 --> 36:55.280]  In their donkey.
[36:55.280 --> 36:56.280]  Okay.
[36:56.280 --> 36:57.280]  What about anus rectum?
[36:57.280 --> 36:58.280]  We can't say anus rectum.
[36:58.280 --> 36:59.280]  Okay.
[36:59.280 --> 37:02.940]  Chris, I've got a question for you.
[37:02.940 --> 37:09.240]  Are you getting the feeling that maybe your efforts have been fruitless?
[37:09.240 --> 37:12.720]  Are you getting the idea that, oh my goodness, this is not working.
[37:12.720 --> 37:15.680]  I got a rejection letter from them.
[37:15.680 --> 37:17.160]  It's not having any effect.
[37:17.160 --> 37:19.200]  No, not at all.
[37:19.200 --> 37:26.120]  I think we're running cover for this lawyer and specifically holding these bar grievances
[37:26.120 --> 37:34.680]  so that way I can't use the mechanism to get these guys to come to the table.
[37:34.680 --> 37:38.640]  So Bargrieve her boss or-
[37:38.640 --> 37:42.120]  Hold on.
[37:42.120 --> 37:46.320]  What is the purpose of the bar?
[37:46.320 --> 37:49.480]  And is the bar serving that purpose?
[37:49.480 --> 38:00.520]  Does that purpose benefit you in this circumstance and has their failure to perform that function
[38:00.520 --> 38:06.800]  they're required to perform harmed you?
[38:06.800 --> 38:09.800]  See where I'm going?
[38:09.800 --> 38:12.440]  He's trying to say official misconduct?
[38:12.440 --> 38:17.400]  No, I'm saying tort.
[38:17.400 --> 38:24.120]  How is it, well, the fact is the lawyer just keeps doing messed up, more messed up stuff.
[38:24.120 --> 38:33.360]  He has entered both of the initial two bar grievances as exhibit in his opposition papers
[38:33.360 --> 38:36.680]  or motion to dismiss papers.
[38:36.680 --> 38:40.960]  He's trying to influence the tribunal.
[38:40.960 --> 38:47.220]  Send him a tort letter, notify him that he has denied you in your remedy at law.
[38:47.220 --> 38:51.280]  And harmed you thereby.
[38:51.280 --> 38:54.720]  That's saying I sue you next, blah, blah.
[38:54.720 --> 38:58.040]  And here's their problem with I sue you next.
[38:58.040 --> 39:04.520]  Win, lose, draw, he loses.
[39:04.520 --> 39:08.640]  You sue him, people say, well, can I sue him for that?
[39:08.640 --> 39:15.880]  Yeah, you can sue him for having a hangnail, you can sue him for anything you want to.
[39:15.880 --> 39:17.480]  Will he get thrown out?
[39:17.480 --> 39:22.080]  Yeah, probably, who cares?
[39:22.080 --> 39:26.480]  They have to hire attorneys, they have to address the issues.
[39:26.480 --> 39:32.800]  It's easy for them just to decide, this is just an inquiry and toss it aside.
[39:32.800 --> 39:39.920]  Let's see how easy it is when they have to fight a claim against them.
[39:39.920 --> 39:43.600]  The bar is not a private company.
[39:43.600 --> 39:46.880]  It's a government sanctioned organization.
[39:46.880 --> 39:52.440]  They have special privileges because the government grants them special privileges.
[39:52.440 --> 39:58.840]  And because of that, they have a duty to perform properly.
[39:58.840 --> 40:05.120]  They're intended as a remedy for you to bad lawyers, but they're failing to perform their
[40:05.120 --> 40:09.080]  duty and give you that remedy, sue them for it.
[40:09.080 --> 40:15.600]  So send the bar agreement letter and the tort letter to the chief counsel of the district
[40:15.600 --> 40:16.960]  of the bar.
[40:16.960 --> 40:17.960]  Exactly.
[40:17.960 --> 40:24.240]  He's probably never had anybody do that to him before.
[40:24.240 --> 40:28.960]  You're the sovereign, you can sue anybody you want to.
[40:28.960 --> 40:35.680]  You can sue God if you could get him served, you'd lose, but he would God would have to
[40:35.680 --> 40:38.360]  answer in the courts.
[40:38.360 --> 40:43.080]  So I'm not saying sue God, that would probably lead to bad outcomes.
[40:43.080 --> 40:47.080]  But anybody short of God is fair game.
[40:47.080 --> 40:53.400]  Actually, I think if you sued God, he would find it pretty funny.
[40:53.400 --> 40:59.520]  He's gotta have a sense of humor, he made one.
[40:59.520 --> 41:03.400]  But anyway, point is, you can sue anybody.
[41:03.400 --> 41:08.000]  And this guy is the director of the State Bar Association.
[41:08.000 --> 41:14.060]  He has a duty to use that bar association to your benefit, and they receive government
[41:14.060 --> 41:17.120]  funds for that purpose.
[41:17.120 --> 41:25.520]  They're a government controlled monopoly to sue him personally.
[41:25.520 --> 41:33.600]  You should have been in court here in Victoria when I sued the judge personally.
[41:33.600 --> 41:39.480]  When I first went to him with criminal complaints, he was really snooty and arrogant.
[41:39.480 --> 41:43.960]  I'm not even gonna read these, and threw them down and stormed out.
[41:43.960 --> 41:48.400]  Well, he did not storm into the courtroom.
[41:48.400 --> 41:59.240]  He tippy-toed into the courtroom, and he wasn't even what the Bible calls meek, because meek
[41:59.240 --> 42:03.480]  means quiet strength.
[42:03.480 --> 42:11.600]  He slithered in there with quiet intimidation.
[42:11.600 --> 42:18.360]  It was glorious to see, exactly.
[42:18.360 --> 42:24.920]  He wasn't throwing down any documents on the counter and storming out this day.
[42:24.920 --> 42:27.360]  This may be what we need to do.
[42:27.360 --> 42:31.000]  What do you think?
[42:31.000 --> 42:32.840]  I have one more question.
[42:32.840 --> 42:37.160]  I still want to file an official misconduct against this lady who's been giving me the
[42:37.160 --> 42:40.480]  runaround five different times and lying to me.
[42:40.480 --> 42:42.760]  Who do I send that bar grievance to?
[42:42.760 --> 42:45.440]  Because it's the Supreme Court in New York State.
[42:45.440 --> 42:47.520]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[42:47.520 --> 42:49.520]  You said official misconduct.
[42:49.520 --> 42:52.360]  Yes, she has to do her job.
[42:52.360 --> 42:53.360]  That's criminal.
[42:53.360 --> 42:54.360]  Yeah.
[42:54.360 --> 43:01.360]  Give that to some magistrate.
[43:01.360 --> 43:05.560]  I have to give it to a magistrate that will be...
[43:05.560 --> 43:08.440]  What's going to happen if you take that to some magistrate?
[43:08.440 --> 43:16.600]  The magistrate's going to hop up and down and dance around on one foot and, oh, well,
[43:16.600 --> 43:20.360]  this is not the proper way to do this, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[43:20.360 --> 43:24.200]  And you're going to say, yeah, it is, get up there and do your job.
[43:24.200 --> 43:27.020]  And he's going to argue back and forth.
[43:27.020 --> 43:29.400]  And then you're going to go away.
[43:29.400 --> 43:34.200]  As soon as you leave the building, she's going to be on the phone to these people.
[43:34.200 --> 43:37.880]  I got somebody in here trying to get me to arrest you.
[43:37.880 --> 43:38.880]  What have you done?
[43:38.880 --> 43:39.880]  Yeah.
[43:39.880 --> 43:43.640]  Because they all got their snouts in the same trough.
[43:43.640 --> 43:47.120]  So it will have its probative effect.
[43:47.120 --> 43:53.240]  They'll be calling each other and trying to get each other to back off quietly without
[43:53.240 --> 43:54.240]  any paper trail.
[43:54.240 --> 43:55.240]  All right.
[43:55.240 --> 43:56.240]  We're just about to go to our sponsors.
[43:56.240 --> 43:57.240]  Hold on, Chris.
[43:57.240 --> 44:00.440]  The rest of us.
[44:00.440 --> 44:05.040]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[44:05.040 --> 44:06.480]  of nutrition.
[44:06.480 --> 44:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.200 --> 44:16.880]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:16.880 --> 44:23.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[44:23.240 --> 44:25.440]  provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.440 --> 44:30.320]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[44:30.320 --> 44:31.440]  we reject.
[44:31.440 --> 44:36.680]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[44:36.680 --> 44:39.520]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.520 --> 44:45.800]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:45.800 --> 44:47.440]  quality radio.
[44:47.440 --> 44:51.760]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.760 --> 44:57.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:57.000 --> 44:58.960]  increase your income.
[44:58.960 --> 44:59.960]  Order now.
[44:59.960 --> 45:04.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.120 --> 45:10.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:10.880 --> 45:14.720]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.720 --> 45:18.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.560 --> 45:22.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.880 --> 45:28.600]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.600 --> 45:34.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.520 --> 45:38.960]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:38.960 --> 45:43.360]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.360 --> 45:49.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.520 --> 45:52.320]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.320 --> 46:14.760]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.760 --> 46:28.040]  Thank you.
[46:44.760 --> 46:56.600]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Lou La Radio. Chris in New York. We've got,
[46:56.600 --> 47:03.400]  I've got a number of Chris's in New York. Your last name wouldn't happen to start with
[47:03.400 --> 47:05.400]  a C, would it?
[47:05.400 --> 47:06.400]  No.
[47:06.400 --> 47:16.800]  Then you're not Chris Campanella. He was a Chris I knew in New York. Okay, so there
[47:16.800 --> 47:22.840]  must be a lot of Chris's in New York. Okay, so what do you think? You don't really have
[47:22.840 --> 47:30.320]  to sue him. You just send him a note, a tort letter, a notice of intent to sue.
[47:30.320 --> 47:32.840]  Right, no problem.
[47:32.840 --> 47:39.520]  That should get him hopping up and down.
[47:39.520 --> 47:47.120]  Let me ask you something. Can I send that criminal complaint to the chief administrative
[47:47.120 --> 47:52.500]  judge of the fifth judicial district, because that's the judicial district of the bar grievance
[47:52.500 --> 47:53.640]  that I'm filing in.
[47:53.640 --> 48:04.640]  As far as I know, you can send a criminal complaint to any magistrate. That's certainly
[48:04.640 --> 48:11.760]  the way it is in Texas, but you're in New York. In New York, the judge can examine into
[48:11.760 --> 48:19.660]  the sufficiency of the allegation. They can't do that in Texas, but they can in New York.
[48:19.660 --> 48:30.760]  So the judge can fail to find probable cause. And he probably will, but we don't care. Because
[48:30.760 --> 48:35.440]  as soon as he fails to find probable cause, he's gonna call these guys and say, hey, I
[48:35.440 --> 48:39.880]  got somebody down here trying to get me to arrest you.
[48:39.880 --> 48:50.200]  It's all politics at the end of the day. Thanks, Randy. You are welcome. Do you have anything
[48:50.200 --> 48:54.960]  else for us? That's it. I'll get you guys going. Thank you.
[48:54.960 --> 49:00.440]  Okay, thank you, Chris. Brett, who are we going to next?
[49:00.440 --> 49:05.640]  Next person up on the board is Scott in Georgia. Good evening, Scott.
[49:05.640 --> 49:10.200]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Scott, are you a hillbilly?
[49:10.200 --> 49:16.040]  That's me. I was having Randy. I was having Brett.
[49:16.040 --> 49:19.040]  Okay. What do you have for us?
[49:19.040 --> 49:22.040]  I know you're bilingual.
[49:22.040 --> 49:24.040]  You don't speak hillbilly?
[49:24.040 --> 49:30.160]  I did go over to Tennessee one time.
[49:30.160 --> 49:36.000]  Okay, Scott, what do you have for us today?
[49:36.000 --> 49:41.920]  You've got a lot of issues. I know we ain't gonna be able to get to them, but the court
[49:41.920 --> 49:49.320]  systems are, everybody that's called in so far, they're experiencing none of the court
[49:49.320 --> 49:56.320]  systems or these bar grievances. They're ignoring us. I'm in contact with the Georgia Judicial
[49:56.320 --> 50:05.480]  Commission, Qualification Commission now. I'm reporting a judge, basically a municipal
[50:05.480 --> 50:15.360]  corporation. I've been completely ignored in the Superior Court. They coerced us over
[50:15.360 --> 50:22.360]  into the magistrate court, violating our right to a trial of a jury. They don't want us going
[50:22.360 --> 50:30.560]  for a jury. We were even told by an attorney, the adverse attorney, that the Superior Judge
[50:30.560 --> 50:41.560]  is not gonna hear our case. What's going on with that?
[50:41.560 --> 50:46.200]  Is he in a position to say he's got some judges in his pocket or something? How's he the one
[50:46.200 --> 50:47.200]  making that call?
[50:47.200 --> 50:54.880]  Oh, it's done got dirty now. That's why I went to the Qualification Commission to see
[50:54.880 --> 51:04.520]  what they're gonna do. This past Monday, I got a letter saying I have made no allegations
[51:04.520 --> 51:15.120]  that rise to the level of full of an investigation. I just wrote a reconsideration letter and
[51:15.120 --> 51:17.720]  sent it to him today.
[51:17.720 --> 51:30.320]  Okay. So tell me, Scott, what would it require to rise to the level of an investigation?
[51:30.320 --> 51:40.320]  They stated in the letter that the allegations don't amount to the code judicial conduct.
[51:40.320 --> 51:47.720]  Okay, so did you claim a violation of the code of judicial conduct?
[51:47.720 --> 52:02.000]  Yes, I did. I sent him my copy of a motion for new trial I put on the court record that
[52:02.000 --> 52:11.320]  referred all the violations of the Georgia Code of Conduct.
[52:11.320 --> 52:21.440]  So if you did in fact provide sufficient information and someone decided that you did not, what
[52:21.440 --> 52:23.920]  is the remedy for that?
[52:23.920 --> 52:32.720]  Well, yeah, there's a reconsideration letter that I can send to Bob.
[52:32.720 --> 52:40.040]  Yeah, there's that, but there's also something else. If I'm in one of these positions and
[52:40.040 --> 52:50.520]  I have a duty to do certain things, if it's my place to investigate and prosecute these
[52:50.520 --> 52:59.080]  kinds of violations, and I refuse to do that, what's that called?
[52:59.080 --> 53:10.960]  It's called official misconduct is what it's called. And it's a crime in just about every
[53:10.960 --> 53:11.960]  state.
[53:11.960 --> 53:18.760]  Yeah, oath of office and oppression.
[53:18.760 --> 53:24.520]  You don't get to not do your job just because you don't want to.
[53:24.520 --> 53:25.520]  Yeah.
[53:25.520 --> 53:34.200]  So if you don't want to do your job, get out of that position and put somebody else in
[53:34.200 --> 53:40.360]  there. Otherwise, you need to pursue them criminally for official misconduct.
[53:40.360 --> 53:50.360]  Yes. Yeah, I'm heading that way. I'm going through the remedies and gathering a record.
[53:50.360 --> 53:57.400]  And what I'm looking to do is just gather all this record on paper, a paper trail.
[53:57.400 --> 54:02.200]  Okay, wait a minute. You're the Scott in Georgia that's been calling in the show for several
[54:02.200 --> 54:05.200]  years now, aren't you?
[54:05.200 --> 54:07.720]  Yes, sir.
[54:07.720 --> 54:18.000]  Okay, then you get it. It's time for you to stop being a servant and start being the master.
[54:18.000 --> 54:24.960]  Think in terms of the master. You don't go in there and ask them to do anything. You
[54:24.960 --> 54:31.200]  go in there and demand that they do it. What happens if you demand that your children do
[54:31.200 --> 54:38.560]  a certain thing and they don't do it?
[54:38.560 --> 54:44.400]  They get themselves a spanking.
[54:44.400 --> 54:54.480]  These public officials have earned a spanking. You're the one that can do it. Nobody else
[54:54.480 --> 54:59.280]  can do it because they all got their snouts in the same trough. And they're terrified
[54:59.280 --> 55:05.080]  if they do anything to annoy somebody else, that somebody else will visit retribution
[55:05.080 --> 55:15.920]  on them. But what are they gonna do when a citizen comes after them? They have no recourse.
[55:15.920 --> 55:21.520]  This is something they can't handle. I was in the military. And in the military, if a
[55:21.520 --> 55:26.880]  general is coming to the base, we had to get out there and pick up every cigarette butt,
[55:26.880 --> 55:29.520]  cut every blade of grass just exactly right.
[55:29.520 --> 55:34.680]  Everything had to be perfect. There was only one person on that base we were more afraid
[55:34.680 --> 55:46.640]  of than a general. That was a civilian. Because a civilian was the only one who could march
[55:46.640 --> 55:53.960]  into the commander's office and crawl down his throat, stomping his feet all the way.
[55:53.960 --> 56:01.900]  And we were terrified of civilians. If you ever go on a military base, you will be treated
[56:01.900 --> 56:09.440]  with the utmost respect. Because the last thing they want you to do is call his commander
[56:09.440 --> 56:16.640]  and chew the commander out. Because you know what's gonna happen to you. So think from
[56:16.640 --> 56:25.640]  that perspective, you are the civilian in the governmental system. Everybody answers
[56:25.640 --> 56:34.440]  to you. And when you start stomping around with hobnail boots on the higher ups, the
[56:34.440 --> 56:42.200]  guys at the bottom get themselves a problem, and they'll get themselves an attitude adjustment.
[56:42.200 --> 56:48.080]  That's my story, and I'm sticking to it. So how could you do that? How could you set these
[56:48.080 --> 56:52.920]  guys up so you can kick them in their professional teeth?
[56:52.920 --> 56:56.600]  Build a paper trail.
[56:56.600 --> 57:02.800]  Yeah, see, I never expect these guys to do what they're supposed to. And never. For the
[57:02.800 --> 57:06.520]  most part, I don't want them to.
[57:06.520 --> 57:07.520]  Yeah, right.
[57:07.520 --> 57:14.480]  If I do it right, I can't take my aggressive tendencies out on them. So don't do what I
[57:14.480 --> 57:20.200]  ask you to do, Bubba. Then I get to beat you up for not doing it.
[57:20.200 --> 57:21.200]  Yeah.
[57:21.200 --> 57:29.960]  Now, that might be a sick and twisted way of thinking things, but it is so satisfying.
[57:29.960 --> 57:38.160]  Yeah, I've gone in my spirit court, I've gone over 10 months and never been heard in that
[57:38.160 --> 57:43.600]  court and threatened with prison if I speak.
[57:43.600 --> 57:46.480]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. What?
[57:46.480 --> 57:47.480]  Right.
[57:47.480 --> 57:50.160]  Threatened with prison if you sue?
[57:50.160 --> 57:52.560]  No, if he speaks.
[57:52.560 --> 57:55.280]  If I speak.
[57:55.280 --> 57:56.280]  Uh-oh.
[57:56.280 --> 57:59.080]  That's even worse.
[57:59.080 --> 58:02.000]  Yeah.
[58:02.000 --> 58:07.320]  So have you filed against the judge? Hang on, Brett, you want to take us out so I don't
[58:07.320 --> 58:08.320]  screw it up?
[58:08.320 --> 58:10.320]  Oh, we got another 44 seconds.
[58:10.320 --> 58:17.040]  Oh, okay. So start hammering your judge. You got lots of things you can do to him. You
[58:17.040 --> 58:22.080]  know, accuse him of denying you access to the court because he doesn't allow you to
[58:22.080 --> 58:23.080]  speak.
[58:23.080 --> 58:24.080]  Yeah.
[58:24.080 --> 58:31.080]  Or redress of grievances.
[58:31.080 --> 58:32.080]  Yes, I do.
[58:32.080 --> 58:33.080]  Yeah.
[58:33.080 --> 58:39.520]  I've got a lot of false misrepresentation on this judge.
[58:39.520 --> 58:43.680]  You need to hammer this judge, let him know who the boss really is.
[58:43.680 --> 58:48.520]  Yeah. All right, we're just about to go to our top of the hour break. Everybody hold
[58:48.520 --> 58:49.520]  on.
[58:49.520 --> 58:55.160]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America
[58:55.160 --> 59:00.840]  is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.840 --> 59:05.320]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.320 --> 59:09.760]  today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.760 --> 59:13.320]  help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.320 --> 59:18.560]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter
[59:18.560 --> 59:24.280]  by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.280 --> 59:27.760]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.760 --> 59:32.760]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:32.760 --> 59:49.120]  Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit
[59:49.120 --> 01:00:05.760]  www.logosradionetwork.com. The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.760 --> 01:00:10.160]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends
[01:00:10.160 --> 01:00:11.160]  on it.
[01:00:11.160 --> 01:00:14.600]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:14.600 --> 01:00:17.480]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.480 --> 01:00:21.600]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it
[01:00:21.600 --> 01:00:26.720]  back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish
[01:00:26.720 --> 01:00:33.600]  too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:00:33.600 --> 01:00:38.720]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:00:38.720 --> 01:00:46.480]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.480 --> 01:00:50.440]  When your mom and dad are getting ready for bed, they pull back the covers and find a
[01:00:50.440 --> 01:00:55.120]  third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.120 --> 01:00:59.240]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment
[01:00:59.240 --> 01:01:04.120]  was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[01:01:04.120 --> 01:01:08.920]  a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get
[01:01:08.920 --> 01:01:13.080]  it? So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell
[01:01:13.080 --> 01:01:17.440]  them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm
[01:01:17.440 --> 01:01:31.960]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.960 --> 01:01:36.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific
[01:01:36.680 --> 01:01:41.360]  freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:01:41.360 --> 01:01:46.120]  Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional
[01:01:46.120 --> 01:01:47.440]  rights.
[01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:51.800]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:01:51.800 --> 01:01:57.400]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.400 --> 01:02:02.960]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:02:02.960 --> 01:02:08.720]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.720 --> 01:02:16.720]  a private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.720 --> 01:02:22.080]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of X-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.080 --> 01:02:26.560]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable
[01:02:26.560 --> 01:02:31.760]  search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it? Unfortunately,
[01:02:31.760 --> 01:02:36.640]  the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point,
[01:02:36.640 --> 01:02:41.200]  let's say airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees demand
[01:02:41.200 --> 01:02:45.820]  a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional
[01:02:45.820 --> 01:02:50.640]  alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their
[01:02:50.640 --> 01:02:55.600]  googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and
[01:02:55.600 --> 01:03:08.480]  information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:25.600 --> 01:03:53.520]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht, Dr. Albrecht, Dr. Albrecht, Dr. Albrecht, Dr. Albrecht, Dr.
[01:03:53.520 --> 01:03:55.760]  Albrecht.
[01:03:55.760 --> 01:04:02.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Taltenbrett-Falton, the Wheel of Law Radio, on this, the seventh
[01:04:02.200 --> 01:04:11.960]  day of April 2023 and we're talking to Scott in Georgia. Okay, Scott, you're missing out
[01:04:11.960 --> 01:04:23.440]  on all the fun. It's one thing when they're coming after you. It's difficult, it's oppressive.
[01:04:23.440 --> 01:04:28.260]  It's depressing, and it's a struggle.
[01:04:28.260 --> 01:04:32.940]  So the best solution is to turn your back on them.
[01:04:32.940 --> 01:04:39.600]  Every time they do something you don't like, use all your legal remedy to go after them.
[01:04:39.600 --> 01:04:43.900]  And you would think if you do that, they're gonna retaliate against you.
[01:04:43.900 --> 01:04:44.900]  No.
[01:04:44.900 --> 01:04:46.900]  It freaks them out.
[01:04:46.900 --> 01:04:47.900]  Exactly.
[01:04:47.900 --> 01:04:49.880]  Say, wait a minute.
[01:04:49.880 --> 01:04:53.100]  I'm supposed to be on the other end of that tool.
[01:04:53.100 --> 01:04:56.080]  How is this happening to me?
[01:04:56.080 --> 01:05:02.240]  And then they want you gone.
[01:05:02.240 --> 01:05:09.680]  They want you happy so you'll go away and leave them alone and not give them grief.
[01:05:09.680 --> 01:05:10.680]  That's what the judge said.
[01:05:10.680 --> 01:05:12.960]  He said, you may not speak.
[01:05:12.960 --> 01:05:16.600]  If you do, I'll put you in prison.
[01:05:16.600 --> 01:05:20.720]  That's where you should have walked out of the courtroom.
[01:05:20.720 --> 01:05:28.960]  So we were letting him finish, and he heard the adverse party.
[01:05:28.960 --> 01:05:31.360]  We weren't able to speak, and they weren't able to speak.
[01:05:31.360 --> 01:05:34.320]  Wouldn't that not be an ex parte communication?
[01:05:34.320 --> 01:05:42.840]  Yeah, if you can't speak, what kind of hearing was this?
[01:05:42.840 --> 01:05:51.520]  This was what, in his order, setting up this, it was what he called a, quote, status hearing,
[01:05:51.520 --> 01:05:52.520]  unquote.
[01:05:52.520 --> 01:05:58.280]  But he never heard the status of our hearing or our case.
[01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:01.760]  What did he do in the hearing?
[01:06:01.760 --> 01:06:08.200]  The hearing, when he got to us, he called her name.
[01:06:08.200 --> 01:06:09.200]  We stood.
[01:06:09.200 --> 01:06:18.600]  He called us up front, I go to speak, he says, you may not speak, if you do, I'll put you
[01:06:18.600 --> 01:06:21.600]  in prison.
[01:06:21.600 --> 01:06:25.240]  Was this a criminal charge against you?
[01:06:25.240 --> 01:06:30.440]  No, it's a suit brought by me and another petitioner.
[01:06:30.440 --> 01:06:31.440]  It's our own.
[01:06:31.440 --> 01:06:36.480]  And that's when he told me that, that's when I'd have walked out of the courtroom and told
[01:06:36.480 --> 01:06:42.200]  the debate, if you come with me, the bailiff needs to arrest that judge.
[01:06:42.200 --> 01:06:43.200]  Yeah.
[01:06:43.200 --> 01:06:44.200]  Yeah.
[01:06:44.200 --> 01:06:53.720]  Well, we let him talk, he said, after he threatened me with prison, he ignored the other petitioner.
[01:06:53.720 --> 01:07:04.040]  He said, I want this case over, and he shortens the discovery time to hurry the case along.
[01:07:04.040 --> 01:07:06.720]  He hears that...
[01:07:06.720 --> 01:07:11.440]  You need to move to strike that judge and get a conference.
[01:07:11.440 --> 01:07:13.440]  Yeah, disqualify him for bias.
[01:07:13.440 --> 01:07:14.440]  Yeah.
[01:07:14.440 --> 01:07:18.960]  As soon as that happened, I motioned for a disqualification and recusal.
[01:07:18.960 --> 01:07:21.480]  He denied that motion.
[01:07:21.480 --> 01:07:23.160]  Whoa.
[01:07:23.160 --> 01:07:25.440]  Can you do that in Georgia?
[01:07:25.440 --> 01:07:26.440]  Huh?
[01:07:26.440 --> 01:07:27.440]  Okay.
[01:07:27.440 --> 01:07:33.240]  In Texas, a judge can deny a motion for recusal.
[01:07:33.240 --> 01:07:36.160]  He cannot deny a motion to disqualify.
[01:07:36.160 --> 01:07:37.160]  Yeah.
[01:07:37.160 --> 01:07:38.160]  Yeah.
[01:07:38.160 --> 01:07:40.160]  He denied the recusal.
[01:07:40.160 --> 01:07:41.160]  I just...
[01:07:41.160 --> 01:07:42.160]  Can you do...
[01:07:42.160 --> 01:07:53.120]  No, the question was, what does Georgia say about a motion to disqualify?
[01:07:53.120 --> 01:08:02.400]  Yeah, there are some certain procedural rules that dictate how he may or may not respond
[01:08:02.400 --> 01:08:07.280]  to those, whether it was a disqualification or a recusal.
[01:08:07.280 --> 01:08:14.600]  In Texas, they always try to recategorize your disqualification as a recusal so that
[01:08:14.600 --> 01:08:19.600]  they can go ahead and deny it, but you gotta hold their feet to the fire and say, no, actually,
[01:08:19.600 --> 01:08:27.000]  that was a disqualification, and you're not allowed to deny the matter of your own disqualification.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  So you have to see what the procedural rule says.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:36.720]  My way of objecting to that is say, Mr. Bailiff, did you hear that?
[01:08:36.720 --> 01:08:37.720]  Arrest that judge.
[01:08:37.720 --> 01:08:45.040]  That was our last move, that was our last move of that day before we left was we went
[01:08:45.040 --> 01:08:51.760]  to the bailiff and we asked him, he says, are we gonna be able to speak in our suit
[01:08:51.760 --> 01:08:56.600]  and uphold our constitutional right, and he says, the judge is done with you today.
[01:08:56.600 --> 01:09:01.360]  He said, the judge what?
[01:09:01.360 --> 01:09:06.200]  The bailiff said the judge is done with you today.
[01:09:06.200 --> 01:09:11.760]  Well that was definitely skirting the question, he didn't answer.
[01:09:11.760 --> 01:09:18.600]  So you need to file criminally against the judge for denying you and your right to petition
[01:09:18.600 --> 01:09:21.400]  the court for redress of grievance.
[01:09:21.400 --> 01:09:22.400]  Yeah.
[01:09:22.400 --> 01:09:31.720]  I think I got him on personal charges and a municipal corporation ordeal.
[01:09:31.720 --> 01:09:35.280]  Wait a minute, municipal corporation, explain.
[01:09:35.280 --> 01:09:47.360]  Yeah, there's statutes about violation, okay, public administration of, I forget the exact
[01:09:47.360 --> 01:09:56.840]  words, but there's a statute talking about public administration being violations.
[01:09:56.840 --> 01:10:02.400]  And they're talking about oath of office and a few other things.
[01:10:02.400 --> 01:10:03.400]  And that's what they've done.
[01:10:03.400 --> 01:10:09.440]  They have violated our due process of law rights, freedom of speech, right to tribal
[01:10:09.440 --> 01:10:14.040]  jury, so they're violating our oaths.
[01:10:14.040 --> 01:10:19.760]  And this is part of a municipal corporation statute violation.
[01:10:19.760 --> 01:10:22.760]  Oh, that's contract.
[01:10:22.760 --> 01:10:23.760]  Yes.
[01:10:23.760 --> 01:10:33.400]  And you might not be able to sue the judge, but you can sue the municipal corporation.
[01:10:33.400 --> 01:10:41.320]  Well I think I can get them both because the municipal corporations talk about the statute
[01:10:41.320 --> 01:10:51.120]  I'm referring to is about neglect, you know, neglect to do their municipal duties personally
[01:10:51.120 --> 01:10:54.120]  they're liable.
[01:10:54.120 --> 01:10:58.440]  Well, then you need to move that along.
[01:10:58.440 --> 01:10:59.440]  Yeah.
[01:10:59.440 --> 01:11:00.440]  This is great.
[01:11:00.440 --> 01:11:03.680]  This gives you an opportunity to sue them.
[01:11:03.680 --> 01:11:10.920]  The judge want to have himself an attitude, see if you can get it adjusted.
[01:11:10.920 --> 01:11:16.080]  And besides, what the heck are you doing calling us, asking us what to do?
[01:11:16.080 --> 01:11:23.200]  You seem to already pretty well know what to do yourself.
[01:11:23.200 --> 01:11:26.200]  I like talking with you to get your opinion.
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:27.200]  Yeah.
[01:11:27.200 --> 01:11:28.200]  Okay.
[01:11:28.200 --> 01:11:36.760]  I guess kind of help other folks kind of get an idea of what I'm doing, what they can do
[01:11:36.760 --> 01:11:37.760]  maybe.
[01:11:37.760 --> 01:11:46.360]  Good, but I really like the, I would like a judge to tell me that if I speak in court,
[01:11:46.360 --> 01:11:52.000]  he will put me in prison.
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:54.040]  Those kinds of things I get to have fun with.
[01:11:54.040 --> 01:12:03.760]  I'd have walked out of the court immediately, drug the bailiff with me, I've done that before.
[01:12:03.760 --> 01:12:08.040]  What I had in mind was I wanted to get everything on the courtroom cameras, because I've been
[01:12:08.040 --> 01:12:14.800]  trying to subpoena the camera and they're ignoring my subpoenas too, sir.
[01:12:14.800 --> 01:12:23.440]  Well, are the cameras part of public record?
[01:12:23.440 --> 01:12:24.800]  I would think so.
[01:12:24.800 --> 01:12:29.520]  I would think everything in that courtroom should be public.
[01:12:29.520 --> 01:12:32.600]  Get somebody else to request the videos.
[01:12:32.600 --> 01:12:39.480]  Well, that's part of my request and part of my argument, my petition to the qualification
[01:12:39.480 --> 01:12:45.960]  commission.
[01:12:45.960 --> 01:12:49.120]  Have you had someone else request these records?
[01:12:49.120 --> 01:12:55.360]  Are you talking about a fellow petitioner or?
[01:12:55.360 --> 01:13:01.160]  No, a third party, an uninterested third party.
[01:13:01.160 --> 01:13:11.400]  Well, that's kind of what the judicial qualification commission, I'm hoping, will do if I can get
[01:13:11.400 --> 01:13:12.400]  them to issue.
[01:13:12.400 --> 01:13:16.440]  No, they're a governmental agency.
[01:13:16.440 --> 01:13:25.240]  Get a friend of yours who's not involved in the case to put in an information request.
[01:13:25.240 --> 01:13:26.240]  Okay.
[01:13:26.240 --> 01:13:27.240]  Okay.
[01:13:27.240 --> 01:13:28.240]  Citizen.
[01:13:28.240 --> 01:13:29.240]  Yeah.
[01:13:29.240 --> 01:13:30.240]  Third party citizen.
[01:13:30.240 --> 01:13:31.240]  Yeah.
[01:13:31.240 --> 01:13:38.240]  Yeah, we can do that because any citizen can request records.
[01:13:38.240 --> 01:13:39.240]  Exactly.
[01:13:39.240 --> 01:13:44.840]  And then when they don't give that person the records, then you can file criminally against
[01:13:44.840 --> 01:13:45.840]  the judge.
[01:13:45.840 --> 01:13:47.840]  That person doesn't have to.
[01:13:47.840 --> 01:13:48.840]  Yeah.
[01:13:48.840 --> 01:13:49.840]  Yeah.
[01:13:49.840 --> 01:13:55.240]  You only have to have reason to believe and do believe.
[01:13:55.240 --> 01:14:02.560]  So if your blood tells you that he asked for these records and the judge failed to provide
[01:14:02.560 --> 01:14:07.240]  them, then you can file against the judge for not doing it.
[01:14:07.240 --> 01:14:10.240]  Yep.
[01:14:10.240 --> 01:14:11.240]  That's my intentions.
[01:14:11.240 --> 01:14:16.720]  Yeah, they're all this paper trail and most people go to a federal court.
[01:14:16.720 --> 01:14:17.720]  Okay.
[01:14:17.720 --> 01:14:20.800]  This raises a couple of questions.
[01:14:20.800 --> 01:14:28.160]  As to the court records, who is the custodian of the record?
[01:14:28.160 --> 01:14:35.040]  I would assume that it would be the judge, but not necessarily.
[01:14:35.040 --> 01:14:40.920]  Make sure that the judge is the custodian of the record for the court.
[01:14:40.920 --> 01:14:49.080]  And then you make this request and you don't care who fails to give it to you.
[01:14:49.080 --> 01:14:55.720]  If the judge is the custodian of the record, he's the respondee at superior.
[01:14:55.720 --> 01:15:00.880]  And this is an administrative procedure.
[01:15:00.880 --> 01:15:04.480]  For administrative procedures, they have no immunity.
[01:15:04.480 --> 01:15:06.520]  Oh, really?
[01:15:06.520 --> 01:15:07.520]  Okay.
[01:15:07.520 --> 01:15:11.160]  I need to look into the codes.
[01:15:11.160 --> 01:15:18.880]  Everything the judge is commanded by law to do, over which he has no discretion, that
[01:15:18.880 --> 01:15:23.680]  is an administrative act and not a judicial act.
[01:15:23.680 --> 01:15:27.440]  And for administrative acts, he has no immunity.
[01:15:27.440 --> 01:15:31.920]  So look for him.
[01:15:31.920 --> 01:15:41.440]  See if you can coax the judge into violating an administrative requirement.
[01:15:41.440 --> 01:15:44.080]  Okay.
[01:15:44.080 --> 01:15:49.920]  One of our issues is a breach of contract.
[01:15:49.920 --> 01:16:01.280]  And contract statutes, they speak to the matter of the judge as it's supposed to interpret
[01:16:01.280 --> 01:16:04.640]  the construction of a contract.
[01:16:04.640 --> 01:16:08.280]  And the jury is to find the fact.
[01:16:08.280 --> 01:16:17.800]  Would this be an administrative duty that the judge is supposed to sit down and ascertain
[01:16:17.800 --> 01:16:21.720]  the interpretation of the contract?
[01:16:21.720 --> 01:16:22.720]  Should that be done?
[01:16:22.720 --> 01:16:28.760]  No, that would not be administrative, that would be judicial.
[01:16:28.760 --> 01:16:33.160]  That goes to the judge making a determination.
[01:16:33.160 --> 01:16:37.600]  So that would not be administrative, that'd be judicial.
[01:16:37.600 --> 01:16:43.120]  Where the judge has no option, he must do either one thing or the other, then that's
[01:16:43.120 --> 01:16:46.280]  administrative for which you can sue it.
[01:16:46.280 --> 01:16:47.280]  Okay.
[01:16:47.280 --> 01:16:54.480]  Hang on, Brett, you want to bring us out, we're about to go to our sponsors.
[01:16:54.480 --> 01:17:00.120]  Yep, you just about got it, five seconds left, we will be right back.
[01:17:00.120 --> 01:17:04.760]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.760 --> 01:17:08.920]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras proven method.
[01:17:08.920 --> 01:17:13.240]  Michael Mirras and now you
[01:17:13.240 --> 01:17:14.560]  can win too.
[01:17:14.560 --> 01:17:19.040]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.040 --> 01:17:20.760]  civil rights statutes.
[01:17:20.760 --> 01:17:24.400]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons?
[01:17:24.400 --> 01:17:26.400]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:17:26.400 --> 01:17:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:33.640]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:17:33.640 --> 01:17:38.760]  The Michael Mirras.
[01:17:38.760 --> 01:17:40.920]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.920 --> 01:17:46.440]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner
[01:17:46.440 --> 01:17:49.440]  or email [email protected].
[01:17:49.440 --> 01:17:58.440]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.440 --> 01:18:00.160]  collectors now.
[01:18:00.160 --> 01:18:01.160]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.160 --> 01:18:04.520]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:07.360]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.360 --> 01:18:08.520]  I need my truth fixed.
[01:18:08.520 --> 01:18:13.280]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.280 --> 01:18:17.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:20.360]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.360 --> 01:18:21.720]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.720 --> 01:18:23.920]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.920 --> 01:18:26.760]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.760 --> 01:18:29.240]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.240 --> 01:18:31.400]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.400 --> 01:18:34.800]  Now go to logosradio.network.com.
[01:18:34.800 --> 01:18:37.760]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.760 --> 01:18:43.440]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.440 --> 01:18:44.440]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.440 --> 01:18:45.440]  No.
[01:18:45.440 --> 01:18:47.240]  Do I get anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.240 --> 01:18:48.240]  No.
[01:18:48.240 --> 01:18:49.240]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.240 --> 01:18:50.240]  No.
[01:18:50.240 --> 01:18:51.240]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.240 --> 01:18:52.240]  Wow.
[01:18:52.240 --> 01:18:54.320]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.320 --> 01:18:55.320]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.320 --> 01:18:56.920]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.920 --> 01:18:58.600]  You're welcome.
[01:18:58.600 --> 01:19:02.000]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:16.360]  This is the logos, logos, radio, network, radio, network, radio, network, radio, network,
[01:19:16.360 --> 01:19:37.160]  network, radio, anything that might count.
[01:19:37.160 --> 01:19:45.720]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruth Law Radio.
[01:19:45.720 --> 01:19:54.600]  And what I was going to say before we went out is I have a case that we just filed against
[01:19:54.600 --> 01:20:03.000]  all the judges in Texas, and I managed to get Harmon Taylor to come on board.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:10.200]  Harmon Taylor is about the smartest guy I know when it comes to law.
[01:20:10.200 --> 01:20:16.840]  He used to be a lawyer and gave up his bar card in disgust.
[01:20:16.840 --> 01:20:24.320]  But he talked to me about two or three hours about how everything is by consent.
[01:20:24.320 --> 01:20:30.920]  And if you listen to the show a lot, you know that when somebody comes in on the show and
[01:20:30.920 --> 01:20:36.040]  says everything is contract, I get real excited.
[01:20:36.040 --> 01:20:42.960]  And start saying trashy words like patriot mythology.
[01:20:42.960 --> 01:20:49.680]  But I got an education from Harmon Taylor that was not patriot mythology.
[01:20:49.680 --> 01:20:54.320]  And he is saying the Constitution simply do not apply.
[01:20:54.320 --> 01:20:58.600]  Everything is by contract and everything's by consent.
[01:20:58.600 --> 01:21:07.160]  I need to get back with him and record his presentation so I can study and take it apart.
[01:21:07.160 --> 01:21:11.960]  Every time I talk to Harmon, it takes me two or three days to get rid of the headache he
[01:21:11.960 --> 01:21:19.040]  gives me and to sort out what he's talking about because he is so deep and so knowledgeable.
[01:21:19.040 --> 01:21:21.520]  You think I'm knowledgeable about law?
[01:21:21.520 --> 01:21:24.680]  I'm a chump compared to Harmon.
[01:21:24.680 --> 01:21:30.640]  So I will do my best to see if I can get him on the air.
[01:21:30.640 --> 01:21:36.560]  If you have complex issues, a difficult question.
[01:21:36.560 --> 01:21:39.080]  Harmon is the right guy for that.
[01:21:39.080 --> 01:21:43.560]  And this is one where I think Harmon could give you some really good direction.
[01:21:43.560 --> 01:21:52.240]  Yeah, the Constitution is pretty much laid out like a contract, terms and all.
[01:21:52.240 --> 01:21:53.240]  Yeah.
[01:21:53.240 --> 01:21:54.800]  See, that's what I said.
[01:21:54.800 --> 01:21:56.280]  He said everything's by contract.
[01:21:56.280 --> 01:21:58.880]  I said, yeah, the Constitution, that's the contract.
[01:21:58.880 --> 01:22:02.240]  He said, no, it's not.
[01:22:02.240 --> 01:22:03.720]  That's not the contract.
[01:22:03.720 --> 01:22:09.000]  So it was just too much for me to assimilate all of it at once.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:18.760]  He was talking about there has been only two republics, Texas and Alabama.
[01:22:18.760 --> 01:22:23.400]  But there was something they had to file, something they had to do that they didn't
[01:22:23.400 --> 01:22:24.400]  do.
[01:22:24.400 --> 01:22:27.560]  And neither one of them are now republics.
[01:22:27.560 --> 01:22:34.720]  But he was feeding me with a fire hose and way more than I could assimilate all at once.
[01:22:34.720 --> 01:22:36.600]  And I didn't have it recorded.
[01:22:36.600 --> 01:22:45.240]  So I need to have another presentation with him and get it recorded so I can go through
[01:22:45.240 --> 01:22:48.960]  it two or three times and separate out all the pieces.
[01:22:48.960 --> 01:22:56.440]  And then go back to him with an itinerary, a set of questions, so we can walk down it
[01:22:56.440 --> 01:22:57.440]  point to point.
[01:22:57.440 --> 01:23:01.720]  I was telling Brett on the break every time I talked to Harmon Taylor, it generally takes
[01:23:01.720 --> 01:23:08.440]  me two or three days to get rid of the headache and that much time to sort out what he tells
[01:23:08.440 --> 01:23:11.040]  me because he is so deep.
[01:23:11.040 --> 01:23:18.240]  So I'm hoping I can get him on the show and let you guys listen to somebody who really
[01:23:18.240 --> 01:23:20.160]  knows what's going on.
[01:23:20.160 --> 01:23:25.160]  And if you listen to the show a lot, you know I've asked these guys that come on with this
[01:23:25.160 --> 01:23:31.960]  contract issues, Patreon issues and ask them, give me law.
[01:23:31.960 --> 01:23:33.880]  Give me something I can work with.
[01:23:33.880 --> 01:23:36.920]  I would love to be able to take these on.
[01:23:36.920 --> 01:23:41.240]  But I can't take it on because you said so.
[01:23:41.240 --> 01:23:45.880]  You cannot give me proactive law out of your own mouth.
[01:23:45.880 --> 01:23:55.240]  I just had a guy on a telegram channel say that it's all contract and that's a fact.
[01:23:55.240 --> 01:24:00.080]  I said, is that a fact, Jack?
[01:24:00.080 --> 01:24:04.800]  It's not near enough for you to simply say that's a fact.
[01:24:04.800 --> 01:24:13.520]  Show me the fact and that's what none of them have been able to do except Harmon.
[01:24:13.520 --> 01:24:20.120]  Harmon represented a grandmother of one of the children killed in the JP Moore building
[01:24:20.120 --> 01:24:29.800]  by Terry McVeigh and the FBI was withholding some 3,000 documents from the defense.
[01:24:29.800 --> 01:24:34.320]  It was Harmon who forced them to release those documents.
[01:24:34.320 --> 01:24:43.180]  Then he raised an issue about them prosecuting Terry McVeigh in Colorado for a crime committed
[01:24:43.180 --> 01:24:46.000]  in Oklahoma.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:53.840]  And he said that the court hit him with a padded two by four.
[01:24:53.840 --> 01:25:02.040]  They went to great length to explain to him how the Constitution did not matter, that
[01:25:02.040 --> 01:25:03.960]  it did not apply.
[01:25:03.960 --> 01:25:13.480]  He said it's constitutional that you be tried in the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred.
[01:25:13.480 --> 01:25:18.640]  So the Constitution commanded them to try him in Oklahoma.
[01:25:18.640 --> 01:25:26.040]  They moved to Colorado and so he raised this issue and they explained it to him and he
[01:25:26.040 --> 01:25:28.960]  apparently got it.
[01:25:28.960 --> 01:25:34.400]  But it was way more complex than I could understand at the time.
[01:25:34.400 --> 01:25:39.960]  I'm hoping I've gained some insight so I'll get back with him and see if he could give
[01:25:39.960 --> 01:25:48.160]  me the insight I need and the law I need so we can start taking on these issues of contract.
[01:25:48.160 --> 01:25:51.040]  So Scott hang in there.
[01:25:51.040 --> 01:25:52.040]  I'll get this.
[01:25:52.040 --> 01:25:57.000]  I think the contract issue is when they swear the oath.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:25:58.560]  I think that's the contract.
[01:25:58.560 --> 01:26:05.120]  Yeah, well, that's what I said to Harmon, that they swore on their oath that they would
[01:26:05.120 --> 01:26:14.440]  uphold the Constitution and protect the Constitution and uphold the laws of the United States.
[01:26:14.440 --> 01:26:17.800]  Or if it was a state, the Constitution, the laws of the state.
[01:26:17.800 --> 01:26:19.840]  And that was a contract.
[01:26:19.840 --> 01:26:20.840]  And then they-
[01:26:20.840 --> 01:26:23.040]  There's definitely one level of contract right there.
[01:26:23.040 --> 01:26:27.640]  You can't discount that, it may not be all the contract factors and the issues there,
[01:26:27.640 --> 01:26:30.200]  but that's certainly something.
[01:26:30.200 --> 01:26:33.680]  What I said to Harmon and he said, no, you don't understand.
[01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:34.800]  That's not how it works.
[01:26:34.800 --> 01:26:38.120]  So I can't speak to how it actually works.
[01:26:38.120 --> 01:26:40.960]  You gave me a headache.
[01:26:40.960 --> 01:26:46.320]  I can't remember all that he said and I hate to try to speak to it when I don't have the
[01:26:46.320 --> 01:26:47.600]  information.
[01:26:47.600 --> 01:26:52.200]  But I made the same argument you're making, Scott.
[01:26:52.200 --> 01:26:55.080]  Yeah, the Constitution was the contract.
[01:26:55.080 --> 01:27:05.480]  And I just made that argument in a brief on speedy trial where Barker Wingo, one of the
[01:27:05.480 --> 01:27:12.520]  tenants of Barker Wingo, is that in order for you to have a right to a speedy trial,
[01:27:12.520 --> 01:27:15.160]  you have to demand it.
[01:27:15.160 --> 01:27:16.160]  Say what?
[01:27:16.160 --> 01:27:20.840]  What the heck's that got to do with the contract?
[01:27:20.840 --> 01:27:27.960]  You swore on your oath that you would protect the Constitution and uphold the laws.
[01:27:27.960 --> 01:27:36.720]  And the Constitution requires you to provide me with a speedy trial.
[01:27:36.720 --> 01:27:40.560]  Doesn't say I have to want it or I have to like it.
[01:27:40.560 --> 01:27:42.920]  It says you to do it.
[01:27:42.920 --> 01:27:48.320]  It also says that you're to arrest people for committing crime.
[01:27:48.320 --> 01:27:54.160]  It doesn't say, well, you can arrest somebody for committing crime if you get their permission
[01:27:54.160 --> 01:27:57.000]  or their agreement.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:02.360]  They arrest me, they take me to jail, they prosecute me.
[01:28:02.360 --> 01:28:06.680]  That's not one of my rights, speedy trial is not one of my rights.
[01:28:06.680 --> 01:28:11.880]  The Constitution does not grant you any rights whatsoever.
[01:28:11.880 --> 01:28:16.280]  Anyone who says that misunderstands what the Constitution is.
[01:28:16.280 --> 01:28:20.400]  The Constitution does not speak to you.
[01:28:20.400 --> 01:28:27.800]  It speaks only to public officials and it says you must do these things.
[01:28:27.800 --> 01:28:34.040]  And you must agree that you will do these things before you collect money from the state
[01:28:34.040 --> 01:28:36.800]  or the Fed.
[01:28:36.800 --> 01:28:43.000]  The contract is not a contract until something of value changes hands.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:49.240]  You require that you swear to this oath and based on that oath, we give you a check.
[01:28:49.240 --> 01:28:53.400]  That creates the contract, but Harmon's saying that's not the case.
[01:28:53.400 --> 01:28:57.000]  Am I giving you a headache, Scott?
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:00.360]  That's not the full case or is he saying that's not true?
[01:29:00.360 --> 01:29:06.920]  He's saying that's not the case at all.
[01:29:06.920 --> 01:29:11.520]  But this is not coming from some patriot mythologist.
[01:29:11.520 --> 01:29:13.860]  This is coming from Harmon Taylor.
[01:29:13.860 --> 01:29:19.480]  So I will get back with him and I'll get this sorted out and bring it to you because I thought
[01:29:19.480 --> 01:29:25.320]  I had a really good argument about the nature of the contract.
[01:29:25.320 --> 01:29:30.480]  And then I have Harmon come along and tell me I'm full of crapola that I have no clue
[01:29:30.480 --> 01:29:34.880]  as to what's going on.
[01:29:34.880 --> 01:29:35.880]  That's smart.
[01:29:35.880 --> 01:29:45.360]  Have you looked into the statutes of course of dealings and course of performance?
[01:29:45.360 --> 01:29:48.360]  Course of dealings?
[01:29:48.360 --> 01:29:53.360]  I can't tell you how he gets there, but before the next show, I'm going to try to get him
[01:29:53.360 --> 01:29:55.160]  to give me that in recorded format.
[01:29:55.160 --> 01:29:56.160]  Okay, we're going to-
[01:29:56.160 --> 01:29:57.160]  All right.
[01:29:57.160 --> 01:29:58.160]  Just about to go to our sponsors.
[01:29:58.160 --> 01:29:59.160]  Be right back.
[01:29:59.160 --> 01:30:05.800]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.800 --> 01:30:10.080]  The new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid
[01:30:10.080 --> 01:30:11.080]  the stuff.
[01:30:11.080 --> 01:30:15.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny
[01:30:15.800 --> 01:30:16.800]  sodas.
[01:30:16.800 --> 01:30:18.720]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.720 --> 01:30:22.320]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.320 --> 01:30:27.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.120 --> 01:30:32.240]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.240 --> 01:30:34.880]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.880 --> 01:30:39.160]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:30:39.160 --> 01:30:42.680]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:42.680 --> 01:30:46.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.200 --> 01:30:50.280]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:50.280 --> 01:30:51.280]  Wrong.
[01:30:51.280 --> 01:30:55.920]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:55.920 --> 01:31:00.900]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more
[01:31:00.900 --> 01:31:02.640]  than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.640 --> 01:31:07.440]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars,
[01:31:07.440 --> 01:31:09.600]  don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:09.600 --> 01:31:14.120]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger
[01:31:14.120 --> 01:31:15.960]  overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.960 --> 01:31:20.400]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds,
[01:31:20.400 --> 01:31:23.600]  avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.600 --> 01:31:25.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.640 --> 01:31:30.440]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.440 --> 01:31:35.800]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:35.800 --> 01:31:37.960]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.960 --> 01:31:42.880]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.880 --> 01:31:45.520]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.520 --> 01:31:48.320]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.320 --> 01:31:49.680]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.680 --> 01:31:50.680]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.680 --> 01:31:52.160]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.160 --> 01:31:53.160]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:54.840]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.840 --> 01:31:57.400]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.400 --> 01:32:00.680]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.680 --> 01:32:04.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:04.880 --> 01:32:07.240]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[01:32:07.240 --> 01:32:10.560]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:12.360]  stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.360 --> 01:32:15.880]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:15.880 --> 01:32:19.600]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:19.600 --> 01:32:23.760]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:23.760 --> 01:32:25.200]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.200 --> 01:32:29.120]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:29.120 --> 01:32:32.880]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:32.880 --> 01:32:34.960]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:34.960 --> 01:32:39.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.280 --> 01:32:40.600]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.600 --> 01:32:43.960]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:43.960 --> 01:32:48.360]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:48.360 --> 01:32:50.680]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.680 --> 01:32:54.640]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.640 --> 01:33:03.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:33.240]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:54.560]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Bret Felt, Rule of Law Radio, and probably I didn't intend
[01:33:54.560 --> 01:34:02.040]  to bring this issue up about Harmon, but Scott, what you were talking about went to it, and
[01:34:02.040 --> 01:34:07.640]  now you're asking me to explain how all this works, and I just don't know yet.
[01:34:07.640 --> 01:34:13.080]  That's probably why I shouldn't have brought it up, but it was extremely interesting, and
[01:34:13.080 --> 01:34:15.440]  I will be getting you answers.
[01:34:15.440 --> 01:34:19.040]  Yeah, I'm interested in the contract stuff.
[01:34:19.040 --> 01:34:23.800]  I've been studying it myself, and there's something to-
[01:34:23.800 --> 01:34:30.960]  The problem with what I'm finding is they're making proactive statement of law out of their
[01:34:30.960 --> 01:34:39.480]  own mouth, except when they give me case law, and it's been my experience when they give
[01:34:39.480 --> 01:34:46.680]  me case law, and I go look up the case law, it doesn't say what they said it says, and
[01:34:46.680 --> 01:34:53.280]  that's really frustrating, but then again, it's not all, you know, I can't just blame
[01:34:53.280 --> 01:34:58.400]  them for it because the courts do the same thing.
[01:34:58.400 --> 01:35:01.760]  It's just that you and I can't do that.
[01:35:01.760 --> 01:35:05.480]  We can't cite case law that's off point.
[01:35:05.480 --> 01:35:12.520]  Scott, have you heard the term that rights belong to the belligerent litigant?
[01:35:12.520 --> 01:35:16.080]  No, I haven't heard that term.
[01:35:16.080 --> 01:35:25.960]  Okay, it's a pretty common term in legal reform, and they cite a case that says that.
[01:35:25.960 --> 01:35:33.040]  Well, I took the case and looked it up and looked for belligerent litigant, and there's
[01:35:33.040 --> 01:35:42.560]  a section in there that says that these two different cases both say that rights belong
[01:35:42.560 --> 01:35:48.360]  to the belligerent litigant, so I looked up those two cases, they didn't say any such
[01:35:48.360 --> 01:35:49.360]  thing.
[01:35:49.360 --> 01:35:58.400]  They didn't have anything to do with it, you know, it's just trash law.
[01:35:58.400 --> 01:36:05.000]  And you've heard the one, Harmon Taylor actually mentioned this one, that, you know, I told
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:13.680]  him that I was disqualifying all the judges in Texas because they've all handled criminal
[01:36:13.680 --> 01:36:22.200]  cases and they've used the current practice, which is in criminal violation of law, so
[01:36:22.200 --> 01:36:23.200]  they're all disqualified.
[01:36:23.200 --> 01:36:28.680]  And he said, well, you've heard the maxim that if all are disqualified, none are disqualified.
[01:36:28.680 --> 01:36:36.880]  I said, yeah, Harmon, I heard the maxim, and I looked in the case, there were two primary
[01:36:36.880 --> 01:36:47.280]  cases that made this assertion, and both of them pointed to Evans v. State federal case
[01:36:47.280 --> 01:36:50.720]  1920s.
[01:36:50.720 --> 01:36:53.920]  I got Evans v. State.
[01:36:53.920 --> 01:36:59.080]  It doesn't say anything about all are qualified.
[01:36:59.080 --> 01:37:07.560]  The only reference to disqualification is a reference to a single judge who is disqualified.
[01:37:07.560 --> 01:37:10.400]  They made this crap up.
[01:37:10.400 --> 01:37:17.360]  Okay, that's problematic, unless you check all your codes.
[01:37:17.360 --> 01:37:23.440]  And with the Internet nowadays, that's relatively easy to do.
[01:37:23.440 --> 01:37:32.600]  Every case I cite, I will be reading a treatise or a brief, and it'll cite a case.
[01:37:32.600 --> 01:37:41.400]  So I take the context from which the case is cited and go to the Internet, look up the
[01:37:41.400 --> 01:37:46.960]  case, and then run those words like belligerent litigate.
[01:37:46.960 --> 01:37:48.480]  This is how I did this.
[01:37:48.480 --> 01:37:53.560]  I opened case text and put in belligerent litigate.
[01:37:53.560 --> 01:37:56.080]  Actually, I started out on Google.
[01:37:56.080 --> 01:38:00.000]  I do most of my legal research on Google, it works great.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:08.600]  I put in belligerent litigate, and it referred to these two cases, and I looked in those
[01:38:08.600 --> 01:38:14.640]  two cases, and both of those two cases, I put in belligerent litigate, and that took
[01:38:14.640 --> 01:38:17.840]  me right to the right paragraph.
[01:38:17.840 --> 01:38:22.800]  And that one referred to a third case, Evans.
[01:38:22.800 --> 01:38:28.040]  I went to the second case, did the same thing, and it referred to Evans.
[01:38:28.040 --> 01:38:33.600]  So I went to the search for Evans, and then I did a search for belligerent litigate on
[01:38:33.600 --> 01:38:34.600]  Evans.
[01:38:34.600 --> 01:38:43.560]  And Scott, guess what I found, nothing.
[01:38:43.560 --> 01:38:47.200]  It wasn't in there.
[01:38:47.200 --> 01:38:54.760]  So I went into the case, and I said, okay, no, I'm sorry, this one, yeah, this one was
[01:38:54.760 --> 01:38:58.760]  if all are disqualified, none are disqualified.
[01:38:58.760 --> 01:38:59.760]  That was Evans.
[01:38:59.760 --> 01:39:07.200]  And there was nothing in there about disqualification, except it mentioned one judge was disqualified
[01:39:07.200 --> 01:39:09.560]  from the case, and that was it.
[01:39:09.560 --> 01:39:10.560]  Wow.
[01:39:10.560 --> 01:39:14.320]  There's bad case law, there's lots of it.
[01:39:14.320 --> 01:39:25.120]  And Scott, you want to really kick the lawyers behind, catch him citing bad law.
[01:39:25.120 --> 01:39:31.000]  That is the biggest no-no for a lawyer.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:38.600]  The second biggest no-no is missing something, but first is quoting bad law.
[01:39:38.600 --> 01:39:44.600]  You quote bad law to a judge, and he accepts what you say, and he then gets appealed and
[01:39:44.600 --> 01:39:49.560]  gets overturned because what you quoted him was wrong.
[01:39:49.560 --> 01:39:57.000]  That gives him a legal black eye, and you're gonna get a legal tooth knocked out.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:00.880]  So always do that when you cite cases.
[01:40:00.880 --> 01:40:09.400]  When I read legal documents now, if I cite a case, I always set a hyperlink on it.
[01:40:09.400 --> 01:40:17.160]  And it's not so much that I want to make it easy for the reader to find the case, is hyperlinks
[01:40:17.160 --> 01:40:25.880]  are in blue, and it breaks up the prose into smaller pieces.
[01:40:25.880 --> 01:40:31.900]  You look at the prose, and you see this big paragraph, and it's got blue sections in it.
[01:40:31.900 --> 01:40:38.560]  So you get a mental picture of how that paragraph is put together.
[01:40:38.560 --> 01:40:44.680]  I just went to the doctor's office, and they wanted me to fill out this questionnaire.
[01:40:44.680 --> 01:40:56.760]  They had 8.5 by 11 page, 10-point font, no space between the sentences, and no paragraphs.
[01:40:56.760 --> 01:40:58.520]  I said, what is this?
[01:40:58.520 --> 01:41:01.720]  Well, that's our agreement.
[01:41:01.720 --> 01:41:10.280]  I said, no human being can read this and make sense of it, this humongous block of text.
[01:41:10.280 --> 01:41:14.120]  Before I could make sense of it, I went through it, and everywhere there should be a paragraph.
[01:41:14.120 --> 01:41:17.680]  I put in a little paragraph mark.
[01:41:17.680 --> 01:41:23.520]  And now I've got marks all through it that break it apart into separate sections.
[01:41:23.520 --> 01:41:28.920]  Now I can read it and kind of generally make a little sense of it.
[01:41:28.920 --> 01:41:35.040]  When I do legal documents, they're written for a 13-year-old who knows nothing about
[01:41:35.040 --> 01:41:36.840]  law.
[01:41:36.840 --> 01:41:45.000]  So I use hyperlinks in order to break up the flow of text into smaller pieces.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:54.800]  And if I cite a case, then I quote whatever the case is referring to and shrink the font
[01:41:54.800 --> 01:42:03.700]  two points, shrink both right and left borders in half an inch, and set it in italics.
[01:42:03.700 --> 01:42:09.800]  So that the reader going down the page, once they look at the first quotation, then they
[01:42:09.800 --> 01:42:12.920]  will know what quotations look like.
[01:42:12.920 --> 01:42:16.940]  So when they're reading down the document and they get to one of these, their brain
[01:42:16.940 --> 01:42:19.120]  will say that's a quotation.
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:24.240]  And if you already know what it is, you'll just skip right over it, and it won't slow
[01:42:24.240 --> 01:42:26.560]  you down at all.
[01:42:26.560 --> 01:42:36.600]  But when you look at the document, those quotations separate out different areas of the argument
[01:42:36.600 --> 01:42:37.600]  in the case.
[01:42:37.600 --> 01:42:44.440]  So you can not only keep track of it from the prose, you can keep track of where you're
[01:42:44.440 --> 01:42:45.440]  at visually.
[01:42:45.440 --> 01:42:47.440]  Does that make sense, Scott?
[01:42:47.440 --> 01:42:48.440]  Oh, yeah.
[01:42:48.440 --> 01:42:52.360]  Yeah, it breaks that thing up so that you can...
[01:42:52.360 --> 01:42:53.360]  Yeah.
[01:42:53.360 --> 01:42:58.440]  But people can only hold so much at one time, so we need to break it down to small pieces.
[01:42:58.440 --> 01:43:07.000]  But I'm kind of running off in the odd direction here, but this part is really important.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:13.960]  When you're reading other people's documents, when I'm reading a lawyer's document, everywhere
[01:43:13.960 --> 01:43:21.280]  I see in the prose, there should be a paragraph, I had to add a line to it.
[01:43:21.280 --> 01:43:24.360]  And that makes it so I can actually read it.
[01:43:24.360 --> 01:43:31.760]  But if I quote it or something, I take those lines back out so it looks like a big gob
[01:43:31.760 --> 01:43:32.760]  of crap.
[01:43:32.760 --> 01:43:39.640]  So if it's a judge that looks at their trash and then looks at ours, a 13-year-old can
[01:43:39.640 --> 01:43:43.640]  read down through it and make sense of it one time through.
[01:43:43.640 --> 01:43:48.560]  Okay, that was a subject I wanted to address, and it didn't have anything to do with what
[01:43:48.560 --> 01:43:50.560]  you were talking about.
[01:43:50.560 --> 01:43:55.200]  But I used you, okay?
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:43:57.240]  I took an unfair advantage.
[01:43:57.240 --> 01:44:00.440]  Okay, where were we then, Scott?
[01:44:00.440 --> 01:44:05.040]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.040 --> 01:44:06.460]  of nutrition.
[01:44:06.460 --> 01:44:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.200 --> 01:44:16.800]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.800 --> 01:44:23.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[01:44:23.200 --> 01:44:25.440]  provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.440 --> 01:44:30.520]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.520 --> 01:44:31.520]  we reject.
[01:44:31.520 --> 01:44:36.680]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:44:36.680 --> 01:44:39.880]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.880 --> 01:44:45.880]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:45.880 --> 01:44:46.880]  Quality Radio.
[01:44:46.880 --> 01:44:51.800]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.800 --> 01:44:57.120]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.120 --> 01:44:58.120]  increase your income.
[01:44:58.120 --> 01:44:59.120]  Order now.
[01:44:59.120 --> 01:45:04.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.160 --> 01:45:10.920]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:10.920 --> 01:45:14.760]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.760 --> 01:45:18.680]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.680 --> 01:45:22.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.920 --> 01:45:27.760]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.760 --> 01:45:34.320]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.320 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.360]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.360 --> 01:45:49.560]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.560 --> 01:46:17.560]  pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:46:17.560 --> 01:46:42.560]  to sign up for our free course at www.ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:46:42.560 --> 01:47:10.440]  Okay, we are back, this is the Rule of Law Radio, Brandon Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain,
[01:47:10.440 --> 01:47:16.400]  we're talking with Scott in Georgia, Scott, right before we went to callers, Randy was
[01:47:16.400 --> 01:47:23.440]  just telling you that now it's your turn to talk, and then here come the sponsors.
[01:47:23.440 --> 01:47:26.720]  Was there something else that you wanted to talk about?
[01:47:26.720 --> 01:47:35.560]  Oh, yeah, I know you got other callers, I'll let them go, I just wanted to call in to kind
[01:47:35.560 --> 01:47:39.560]  of tell you what's going on and kind of help other folks out.
[01:47:39.560 --> 01:47:45.760]  Yeah, yeah, that's good, but all right, you know, cool, look, look in the course of performance
[01:47:45.760 --> 01:47:52.600]  doctrine and all that, that'll help contract for contract issues.
[01:47:52.600 --> 01:47:53.600]  Course of performance.
[01:47:53.600 --> 01:47:54.600]  All right.
[01:47:54.600 --> 01:47:55.600]  Yeah.
[01:47:55.600 --> 01:47:56.600]  All right.
[01:47:56.600 --> 01:48:02.120]  Well, thanks, Scott, good talking with you this evening, appreciate your call.
[01:48:02.120 --> 01:48:03.120]  Yes, sir.
[01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:04.120]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:48:04.120 --> 01:48:05.120]  All right.
[01:48:05.120 --> 01:48:06.120]  Good night.
[01:48:06.120 --> 01:48:10.560]  Okay, next, we're going to go to Jack in Texas.
[01:48:10.560 --> 01:48:13.120]  Hey, Jack, good evening.
[01:48:13.120 --> 01:48:14.120]  What's on your mind?
[01:48:14.120 --> 01:48:15.120]  Hi, guys.
[01:48:15.120 --> 01:48:16.120]  Can you hear me?
[01:48:16.120 --> 01:48:17.120]  Yes.
[01:48:17.120 --> 01:48:18.120]  Good.
[01:48:18.120 --> 01:48:34.360]  I just want to get some help with the suing this judge and maybe a county attorney about
[01:48:34.360 --> 01:48:40.240]  the two traffic tickets and I finally got them dismissed because I filed charges against
[01:48:40.240 --> 01:48:41.240]  everybody.
[01:48:41.240 --> 01:48:53.920]  So, I was just asking tonight and I think Randy said if one of these officials doesn't
[01:48:53.920 --> 01:48:59.280]  do something that they are supposed to do, you can sue them for it.
[01:48:59.280 --> 01:49:09.640]  Right, if it's something that is a ministerial duty, they've got the statute compels them
[01:49:09.640 --> 01:49:14.600]  to do a certain thing, then that means they don't have any discretion.
[01:49:14.600 --> 01:49:19.320]  They don't get to wiggle out and say, oh, I'm just doing my job, part of my job is to
[01:49:19.320 --> 01:49:22.480]  figure out, you know, judicially this or that.
[01:49:22.480 --> 01:49:28.920]  But a judge has some things that he decides as a judge and other things that he has just
[01:49:28.920 --> 01:49:32.360]  administratively he is required to do.
[01:49:32.360 --> 01:49:40.040]  So if he doesn't do those things, then that's when you just sue him straight up.
[01:49:40.040 --> 01:49:44.520]  Or if he commits a crime, that's obviously out of scope, that's not part of his judicial
[01:49:44.520 --> 01:49:49.520]  duties, it's a crime.
[01:49:49.520 --> 01:49:51.280]  Okay.
[01:49:51.280 --> 01:50:04.160]  So if the judge ignores your subject matter jurisdiction challenge, that would be a violation,
[01:50:04.160 --> 01:50:05.160]  wouldn't it?
[01:50:05.160 --> 01:50:06.160]  Hmm.
[01:50:06.160 --> 01:50:10.200]  I don't know, Randy, what would you say?
[01:50:10.200 --> 01:50:20.920]  Does that ignoring the challenge to jurisdiction, would you say that come squarely into the
[01:50:20.920 --> 01:50:27.600]  I don't know, it seems like I can see that being from inside because he has judicial
[01:50:27.600 --> 01:50:28.600]  duties.
[01:50:28.600 --> 01:50:29.600]  Go ahead.
[01:50:29.600 --> 01:50:35.720]  Yeah, there are a lot of, there are a number of things a judge can do with a subject matter
[01:50:35.720 --> 01:50:38.360]  jurisdiction challenge.
[01:50:38.360 --> 01:50:42.080]  Deny it is not one of them.
[01:50:42.080 --> 01:50:49.960]  Once jurisdiction is challenged, jurisdiction is lost and must be proven.
[01:50:49.960 --> 01:50:56.000]  So if you have a jurisdictional challenge and the judge did not address it, then file
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:50:57.560]  criminally against the judge.
[01:50:57.560 --> 01:51:04.280]  He's acting outside the scope of his authority.
[01:51:04.280 --> 01:51:06.800]  Don't let him get past that.
[01:51:06.800 --> 01:51:14.840]  Okay, I did file criminally, but now can I sue him?
[01:51:14.840 --> 01:51:25.600]  And did you file a motion for stay in or a motion to disqualify the judge for cause?
[01:51:25.600 --> 01:51:26.600]  No.
[01:51:26.600 --> 01:51:31.840]  File a motion to disqualify, and this will bring it in front of the head administrative
[01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:32.840]  judge in the district.
[01:51:32.840 --> 01:51:34.880]  But what state are you in?
[01:51:34.880 --> 01:51:35.880]  Texas.
[01:51:35.880 --> 01:51:36.880]  Okay.
[01:51:36.880 --> 01:51:42.120]  This will bring it before the head administrative judge in the district.
[01:51:42.120 --> 01:51:45.920]  So he gets it in front of other judges.
[01:51:45.920 --> 01:51:56.180]  And the judge will probably deny it, but then you can go on and file a writ of mandamus
[01:51:56.180 --> 01:51:59.440]  to the court of appeals.
[01:51:59.440 --> 01:52:04.000]  This is jurisdiction, it's a big deal.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:08.840]  And you're likely to get a good ruling from the court of criminal appeals or the court
[01:52:08.840 --> 01:52:14.400]  of appeals.
[01:52:14.400 --> 01:52:18.520]  They've already dismissed the charges, does that matter?
[01:52:18.520 --> 01:52:21.000]  No, it doesn't matter.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:24.880]  Okay, they dismissed the charges against you?
[01:52:24.880 --> 01:52:25.880]  Yes.
[01:52:25.880 --> 01:52:28.560]  Well, that's fine.
[01:52:28.560 --> 01:52:29.560]  That's different.
[01:52:29.560 --> 01:52:32.440]  That's a different channel, it's a different track.
[01:52:32.440 --> 01:52:37.560]  Whenever somebody's accusing you of something, that's one issue, and then you accusing them
[01:52:37.560 --> 01:52:40.480]  of something, that's a different issue.
[01:52:40.480 --> 01:52:50.600]  Yeah, okay, this doesn't go exactly to law, it goes to objective reasonableness.
[01:52:50.600 --> 01:53:00.720]  If they dismiss the charges against you, then the jurisdiction issue becomes moot.
[01:53:00.720 --> 01:53:03.080]  And that's what the courts will say.
[01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:08.640]  The court obviously no longer has jurisdiction because the case was dismissed.
[01:53:08.640 --> 01:53:12.600]  So it's not necessary for us to argue the other issue.
[01:53:12.600 --> 01:53:21.920]  Now, for what was it dismissed, how was it dismissed?
[01:53:21.920 --> 01:53:27.680]  What did the court claim in the dismissal?
[01:53:27.680 --> 01:53:28.680]  I don't really know.
[01:53:28.680 --> 01:53:35.200]  They just called me and said they were dismissing the charges.
[01:53:35.200 --> 01:53:37.360]  Okay.
[01:53:37.360 --> 01:53:44.600]  If they dismiss the case for, let's see, how did we do this?
[01:53:44.600 --> 01:53:49.960]  We just had one dismissed this way, oh, for lack of evidence.
[01:53:49.960 --> 01:53:55.240]  We had one dismissed for lack of evidence, and I'd never seen that before.
[01:53:55.240 --> 01:53:59.320]  And I thought, why on earth would they do that?
[01:53:59.320 --> 01:54:05.520]  Because we had claimed there was no examining trial, and they dismissed for lack of evidence.
[01:54:05.520 --> 01:54:11.400]  And we said, well, if you'd had an examining trial two years ago, this lack of evidence
[01:54:11.400 --> 01:54:14.360]  would have become apparent.
[01:54:14.360 --> 01:54:17.640]  So why on earth would they dismiss for lack of evidence?
[01:54:17.640 --> 01:54:26.400]  And then I found out a guy was held for five months in Houston, and then they dismissed
[01:54:26.400 --> 01:54:27.920]  for lack of evidence.
[01:54:27.920 --> 01:54:33.720]  He sued them and won $606,000.
[01:54:33.720 --> 01:54:41.080]  And now the attorney general has filed suit claiming they should not have to pay this
[01:54:41.080 --> 01:54:50.480]  $660,000 because the person was never determined to be innocent.
[01:54:50.480 --> 01:54:57.640]  The case was dismissed for lack of evidence, and he said that doesn't mean he's not guilty.
[01:54:57.640 --> 01:55:01.960]  And I'm saying, heck, it doesn't.
[01:55:01.960 --> 01:55:03.800]  That's exactly what it means.
[01:55:03.800 --> 01:55:10.240]  But the attorney general is trying to get out of paying this $600,000.
[01:55:10.240 --> 01:55:17.200]  That's why they dismissed this recent one for lack of evidence.
[01:55:17.200 --> 01:55:23.480]  They didn't wanna be sued, and they were hoping they would have an argument saying that, well,
[01:55:23.480 --> 01:55:24.960]  we dismissed for lack of evidence.
[01:55:24.960 --> 01:55:25.960]  That doesn't mean she's innocent.
[01:55:25.960 --> 01:55:31.760]  And when we're saying absolutely does, if you had had an examining trial the way the
[01:55:31.760 --> 01:55:40.200]  law commands you to do on the first day, the lack of evidence issue would have been apparent.
[01:55:40.200 --> 01:55:42.240]  But you didn't do that.
[01:55:42.240 --> 01:55:45.380]  So this particular case, it doesn't work well.
[01:55:45.380 --> 01:55:48.160]  Look at your case and see why they dismissed it.
[01:55:48.160 --> 01:55:52.320]  Did they have an examining trial in your case?
[01:55:52.320 --> 01:55:53.320]  No.
[01:55:53.320 --> 01:55:59.720]  Yeah, I was gonna say that was a rhetorical question cuz we knew the answer.
[01:55:59.720 --> 01:56:05.080]  Was there a 1617 order in the record?
[01:56:05.080 --> 01:56:11.440]  An order by a magistrate after an examining trial stating whether he found probable cause
[01:56:11.440 --> 01:56:14.960]  or did not find probable cause.
[01:56:14.960 --> 01:56:16.760]  That's also a rhetorical question.
[01:56:16.760 --> 01:56:23.160]  If they didn't hold an examining trial, there's no 1617 order, so they never had jurisdiction
[01:56:23.160 --> 01:56:26.040]  from day one.
[01:56:26.040 --> 01:56:27.880]  That's pretty much every case.
[01:56:27.880 --> 01:56:32.880]  They're required to have it, but they never do.
[01:56:32.880 --> 01:56:35.560]  Here's my question.
[01:56:35.560 --> 01:56:41.280]  They didn't have jurisdiction as soon as I filed the subject matter challenge.
[01:56:41.280 --> 01:56:48.520]  But they continued on with the case and dragged it on for a whole year.
[01:56:48.520 --> 01:56:55.520]  Sue them for everything they did, to them personally, because they had no jurisdiction.
[01:56:55.520 --> 01:56:56.520]  Right.
[01:56:56.520 --> 01:57:07.360]  Sue them in their personal capacity, and they'll come to the table and make a deal.
[01:57:07.360 --> 01:57:15.400]  And send me an email, I will send you my 1617 argument.
[01:57:15.400 --> 01:57:23.920]  We just filed that in a suit against all the highest judges in Texas.
[01:57:23.920 --> 01:57:31.320]  We accused them of engaging in an ongoing criminal enterprise to prosecute people without
[01:57:31.320 --> 01:57:36.320]  a proper determination to probable cause.
[01:57:36.320 --> 01:57:47.680]  So it's going to be sensitive right now, and it's likely to get you a deal really quick.
[01:57:47.680 --> 01:57:54.040]  One of the things I've come to find out, I'm a purist.
[01:57:54.040 --> 01:57:56.880]  I think everything should be done right.
[01:57:56.880 --> 01:57:59.200]  And I'm not doing this for the money.
[01:57:59.200 --> 01:58:02.640]  We all say we're not doing this for the money.
[01:58:02.640 --> 01:58:06.720]  And now I'm saying, what the hell's been wrong with us all the time?
[01:58:06.720 --> 01:58:13.280]  We should be doing this for the money, because that's all they pay attention to, nothing
[01:58:13.280 --> 01:58:15.740]  else matters.
[01:58:15.740 --> 01:58:19.920]  So you're not doing it because you want the money, you're doing it because you want them
[01:58:19.920 --> 01:58:20.920]  to start doing it right.
[01:58:20.920 --> 01:58:23.920]  But the only way to get them to do it right is to get in their pocket.
[01:58:23.920 --> 01:58:24.920]  Okay.
[01:58:24.920 --> 01:58:25.920]  Greg, you want to take us out?
[01:58:25.920 --> 01:58:26.920]  I've got a couple more questions.
[01:58:26.920 --> 01:58:27.920]  All right.
[01:58:27.920 --> 01:58:28.920]  We're going to break.
[01:58:28.920 --> 01:58:29.920]  Jack, we're going to our sponsors here.
[01:58:29.920 --> 01:58:30.920]  So just hold on.
[01:58:30.920 --> 01:58:45.120]  Scott, I see you're still hanging on the line there, if you could go to the listener line.
[01:58:45.120 --> 01:58:50.120]  We're just about to go to the top of the hour, right back.
[01:58:50.120 --> 01:58:55.520]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.520 --> 01:58:58.360]  because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.360 --> 01:59:03.720]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[01:59:03.720 --> 01:59:07.000]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:08.800]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:08.800 --> 01:59:14.680]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[01:59:14.680 --> 01:59:18.440]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.440 --> 01:59:23.440]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[01:59:23.440 --> 01:59:28.120]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.120 --> 01:59:33.280]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.280 --> 01:59:43.720]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.720 --> 01:59:47.720]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.720 --> 01:59:48.720]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.720 --> 02:00:15.720]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.