ROL_2023-03-16_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.680 --> 00:09.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.360 --> 00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.760 --> 00:16.880]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.880 --> 00:18.480]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.480 --> 00:22.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.080 --> 00:26.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.840 --> 00:31.920]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.920 --> 00:34.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.600 --> 00:38.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:38.920 --> 00:42.440]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.440 --> 00:44.560]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.560 --> 00:47.720]  SPAR, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.720 --> 00:51.200]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.200 --> 00:56.520]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to SPAR with you, SPAR with an extra P.
[00:56.520 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:06.920]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.920 --> 01:08.440]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.440 --> 01:10.800]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.800 --> 01:14.520]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.520 --> 01:17.880]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell
[01:17.880 --> 01:21.240]  out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.240 --> 01:22.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.680 --> 01:31.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:34.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.680 --> 01:38.160]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.160 --> 01:39.640]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.640 --> 01:43.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.520 --> 01:46.640]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.640 --> 01:48.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.840 --> 01:56.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.600 --> 02:01.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.760 --> 02:04.360]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[02:04.360 --> 02:08.640]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.640 --> 02:12.160]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.160 --> 02:15.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.760 --> 02:20.120]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.120 --> 02:22.200]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.200 --> 02:26.680]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms.
[02:26.680 --> 02:30.560]  Arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.560 --> 02:31.560]  Get it?
[02:31.560 --> 02:32.560]  Two arms?
[02:32.560 --> 02:33.560]  Bear hug?
[02:33.560 --> 02:34.560]  Bear arms?
[02:34.560 --> 02:37.520]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.520 --> 02:42.240]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against
[02:42.240 --> 02:47.440]  arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.440 --> 02:50.520]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.520 --> 03:19.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:20.520 --> 03:50.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:50.320 --> 04:19.400]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Brandon Kelton, Brett Fatt out in the Rural Radio on this, the 16th
[04:19.400 --> 04:31.920]  of March, 2023, and we're going to start out with Brett messing with the federal courts.
[04:31.920 --> 04:32.920]  With me?
[04:32.920 --> 04:37.520]  Well, yeah, tell us, tell us about your appeal to that.
[04:37.520 --> 04:38.520]  Okay.
[04:38.520 --> 04:48.400]  Well, this appeal is from the federal district court to federal circuit, what do they call
[04:48.400 --> 04:49.400]  it?
[04:49.400 --> 05:01.880]  Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and this is on my accusation, I sued a lawyer for a whole
[05:01.880 --> 05:02.880]  bunch of lies.
[05:02.880 --> 05:08.480]  He, he stacked up so much aggravated perjury that it just got under my skin and I said,
[05:08.480 --> 05:15.840]  well, he's not allowed to do these crimes and I took him to the feds and said, look,
[05:15.840 --> 05:24.120]  this is a deprivation of my, my inherent and constitutionally protected due process rights.
[05:24.120 --> 05:29.600]  I can't have this guy over here doing all this lying and he's deceiving the court and
[05:29.600 --> 05:33.360]  the court believed him and I was harmed thereby.
[05:33.360 --> 05:39.360]  And they, the federal district court sat on this for a really long time.
[05:39.360 --> 05:48.400]  They gave the defendants an extension of time to answer since they failed to answer and,
[05:48.400 --> 05:54.680]  and that way they could, the next day after it was the deadline to answer, I filed a motion
[05:54.680 --> 06:01.480]  for default judgment, but they didn't rule on that until after they gave an extension
[06:01.480 --> 06:09.960]  to the defendants and then said the, the default is moot.
[06:09.960 --> 06:17.280]  Well, they went on and on with nonsense like this for a long time and the magistrate judge
[06:17.280 --> 06:21.440]  was involving herself without any lawful authority.
[06:21.440 --> 06:27.720]  So then I started going after the magistrate judge and several other things in the same,
[06:27.720 --> 06:33.040]  well, you know, while I have a case open, I went ahead and dealt with several issues
[06:33.040 --> 06:40.120]  like being allowed into the federal courthouse.
[06:40.120 --> 06:46.480]  They only want to allow people that either a, don't have a phone or iPad or any kind
[06:46.480 --> 06:48.880]  of electronic smartwatch, nothing like that.
[06:48.880 --> 06:53.560]  That's one group of people that can come in and another group of people that can come
[06:53.560 --> 07:02.400]  in is law enforcement and, and bar card carriers, but for average Joe, they don't let them let
[07:02.400 --> 07:03.400]  us in.
[07:03.400 --> 07:09.560]  So I said, you're asking to give up one right.
[07:09.560 --> 07:15.080]  They let the criminals in and they let the criminals in and not the good guys.
[07:15.080 --> 07:16.080]  Right.
[07:16.080 --> 07:24.600]  So I said, you're, you're asking me to give up one right in order to exercise another right.
[07:24.600 --> 07:25.960]  And they didn't want to rule on that one.
[07:25.960 --> 07:28.960]  They just try to leave that one alone.
[07:28.960 --> 07:33.920]  And so I went above their heads and, you know, did judicial misconduct complaint and so forth
[07:33.920 --> 07:37.920]  and, and rid of habeas corpus.
[07:37.920 --> 07:41.120]  I'm just stirring up, you know, I want them to follow their rules.
[07:41.120 --> 07:42.640]  I want them to follow the laws.
[07:42.640 --> 07:47.920]  I want them to go by what it says in black and white.
[07:47.920 --> 07:54.560]  Well, anyway, they finally got a district judge involved for the first time.
[07:54.560 --> 08:02.880]  And all he did was adopt the recommendations of the magistrate judge.
[08:02.880 --> 08:10.520]  Now, the recommendations are something that are intended to occur after what the federal
[08:10.520 --> 08:16.680]  rule calls the required proceedings, including evidence, your hearings, they didn't have
[08:16.680 --> 08:17.680]  any of that.
[08:17.680 --> 08:24.880]  She just had a magistrate judge just had a, she just clicked on something and said, no,
[08:24.880 --> 08:27.800]  this is a, this is going to be denied.
[08:27.800 --> 08:28.920]  And there was no hearing.
[08:28.920 --> 08:34.800]  There was no evidence, there was no evidence, your hearing, there was no required proceedings.
[08:34.800 --> 08:41.040]  She just says how she wants to rule, and then at some point, the district judge finally
[08:41.040 --> 08:42.040]  stepped in.
[08:42.040 --> 08:49.480]  And I had already debunked the concept of her being lawfully authorized to be involved
[08:49.480 --> 08:52.040]  at all.
[08:52.040 --> 09:01.880]  Title 28 US code 636 has some, um, some characteristics of what it would look like for a magistrate
[09:01.880 --> 09:05.080]  judge to be authorized.
[09:05.080 --> 09:10.080]  If this happens, if that happens, so this magistrate judge said that her authorization
[09:10.080 --> 09:13.720]  was from subsection C, consent of the parties.
[09:13.720 --> 09:16.280]  Oh, so I just made a big stink about that.
[09:16.280 --> 09:17.880]  There was no consent of the parties.
[09:17.880 --> 09:26.760]  Well, I also addressed in their subsection B, which is when a district judge has a matter
[09:26.760 --> 09:37.560]  before the court and hands it off to, it says designates or assigns a, uh, a particular,
[09:37.560 --> 09:47.200]  a certain matter, a pretrial matter, can't be dispositive and designates that to a magistrate
[09:47.200 --> 09:48.200]  judge.
[09:48.200 --> 09:54.080]  Well, what they're doing is a completely different process day in, day out.
[09:54.080 --> 10:00.320]  What they do is as soon as you go and file a case, they automatically indiscriminately
[10:00.320 --> 10:08.240]  assign without the involvement of a district judge assigned the entire case and all matters
[10:08.240 --> 10:13.200]  not even before the court yet to a certain magistrate judge.
[10:13.200 --> 10:18.560]  And as the issues come up, that magistrate judge handles it and then at some point way
[10:18.560 --> 10:22.040]  down the line, the district judge signs off on it.
[10:22.040 --> 10:25.440]  Well, I'm sorry, but that's not how the law is written.
[10:25.440 --> 10:28.560]  So I'm giving them a hard time about that.
[10:28.560 --> 10:35.600]  Um, um, thinking as you're, you're talking, you know, this is a common problem.
[10:35.600 --> 10:41.520]  Uh, I've been through it, uh, just anyone who files a case in the federal court winds
[10:41.520 --> 10:46.680]  up with a magistrate judge and the magistrate judge is not really answerable.
[10:46.680 --> 10:50.480]  He's just, uh, that judge, he or she is just appointed.
[10:50.480 --> 10:56.840]  And this has been a problem and I'm thinking while you're, you're talking, how do we get
[10:56.840 --> 10:59.360]  a shot at him?
[10:59.360 --> 11:05.200]  If the magistrate judge who claimed to be acting based on the consent of the parties
[11:05.200 --> 11:12.000]  did not have the consent of the parties, what if you sue the magistrate judge personally?
[11:12.000 --> 11:13.000]  Hmm.
[11:13.000 --> 11:14.000]  Yeah.
[11:14.000 --> 11:15.000]  Right now.
[11:15.000 --> 11:22.520]  Right now, I think I could sue the district judge because the district judge lied.
[11:22.520 --> 11:32.280]  He's a lot harder to get to magistrate judge or like toadies, they got a bunch of them.
[11:32.280 --> 11:38.960]  They're just lawyers, lawyers authorized to practice in the federal court who can't make
[11:38.960 --> 11:40.160]  it as a lawyer.
[11:40.160 --> 11:42.360]  So they go down and get appointed as a magistrate.
[11:42.360 --> 11:51.880]  It's kind of like these, uh, court appointed counsel, uh, or these, uh, assistant district
[11:51.880 --> 11:53.720]  attorney in a municipal court.
[11:53.720 --> 11:56.280]  I mean, how do you get lower than that?
[11:56.280 --> 12:05.960]  We've become a magistrate judge in the federal court, how can you go?
[12:05.960 --> 12:06.960]  Yeah.
[12:06.960 --> 12:12.920]  They're just chumps and they do all the dirty stuff for the judges.
[12:12.920 --> 12:14.720]  So how do we thump them?
[12:14.720 --> 12:18.640]  Well, I'm working on that right now.
[12:18.640 --> 12:24.040]  I've lined up some facts and some laws and some conclusions that I think are going to
[12:24.040 --> 12:26.720]  feed nicely into a suit.
[12:26.720 --> 12:30.480]  And I'd like your idea about that being against the magistrate judge.
[12:30.480 --> 12:36.640]  I was starting to think that since the district judge has just involved himself, uh, he's
[12:36.640 --> 12:41.440]  stepping into trouble, but like you said, he's, he's more well protected.
[12:41.440 --> 12:46.960]  I think this magistrate judge can be held accountable for everything that she personally
[12:46.960 --> 12:47.960]  has done.
[12:47.960 --> 12:57.720]  And in any case, you can really black her political eye if she's the magistrate judge
[12:57.720 --> 13:06.000]  who winds up drawing a lawsuit onto the, the district, they're not going to be happy.
[13:06.000 --> 13:07.000]  Let's go back.
[13:07.000 --> 13:14.040]  I was in the military and finally the military and, uh, I follow somebody, you know, I get
[13:14.040 --> 13:18.000]  directly, we all get orders to do certain things, go out and cut the grass.
[13:18.000 --> 13:21.160]  I don't cut the grass right.
[13:21.160 --> 13:25.000]  And the general comes in and the grass is a mess.
[13:25.000 --> 13:27.040]  He's not going to talk to me.
[13:27.040 --> 13:29.120]  He don't care who I am.
[13:29.120 --> 13:30.800]  He's going to talk to the squadron commander.
[13:30.800 --> 13:34.120]  So I came in here squadron and the grass was a mess.
[13:34.120 --> 13:36.360]  What the heck is that?
[13:36.360 --> 13:42.980]  And the squadron commander is going to go to the officer in charge of my duty section.
[13:42.980 --> 13:49.400]  And he's going to say the man, the grass in your duty section was a mess and I got chewed
[13:49.400 --> 13:51.520]  out by the boss.
[13:51.520 --> 13:52.520]  You're in trouble.
[13:52.520 --> 13:56.760]  Well, I told him that I don't care what it doesn't make any difference.
[13:56.760 --> 13:59.760]  If you can't get it done, I'll get somebody in here who will.
[13:59.760 --> 14:01.720]  That's how it works.
[14:01.720 --> 14:09.200]  So this federal judge has got this magistrate judge and it's, it's the magistrate judge
[14:09.200 --> 14:11.560]  to handle these issues.
[14:11.560 --> 14:14.560]  Why am I having to deal with these issues?
[14:14.560 --> 14:16.520]  Well, I did this.
[14:16.520 --> 14:17.520]  I did.
[14:17.520 --> 14:18.680]  I don't care what you did.
[14:18.680 --> 14:21.000]  I hired you to make this go away.
[14:21.000 --> 14:26.640]  If it don't go away, it's your fault.
[14:26.640 --> 14:34.120]  I go into it from that perspective and nobody cares if you're right or wrong.
[14:34.120 --> 14:35.680]  You just make the accusation.
[14:35.680 --> 14:37.000]  Can you prove it up?
[14:37.000 --> 14:38.000]  Who cares?
[14:38.000 --> 14:40.520]  That's not going to make any difference.
[14:40.520 --> 14:43.640]  I actually can, but they're not going to listen anyway.
[14:43.640 --> 14:44.640]  So it doesn't matter.
[14:44.640 --> 14:45.640]  Yeah.
[14:45.640 --> 14:46.640]  So it doesn't matter.
[14:46.640 --> 14:47.640]  Just sting them.
[14:47.640 --> 14:52.160]  And then the guy who, whoever responds, you sting him.
[14:52.160 --> 14:59.040]  And then the word will get out, don't even let that guy get back into my court.
[14:59.040 --> 15:03.640]  If he comes back into my court, I better not have any problems from you, from him, or you
[15:03.640 --> 15:05.760]  better fix it.
[15:05.760 --> 15:08.240]  And they're going to say, how did this happen anyway?
[15:08.240 --> 15:11.160]  Is this a speeding ticket really?
[15:11.160 --> 15:13.000]  You kidding me?
[15:13.000 --> 15:19.120]  I keep thinking back to the Jazonowski case.
[15:19.120 --> 15:22.000]  Everybody should learn from the Jazonowski case.
[15:22.000 --> 15:32.680]  Jazonowski, they got a $99,000 mortgage, wasn't even a hundred grand.
[15:32.680 --> 15:39.960]  And they didn't, something they didn't like, and within the time limit, they filed a notice
[15:39.960 --> 15:43.040]  of rescission.
[15:43.040 --> 15:48.920]  And Wells Fargo said, well, if you want to rescind you, you have to give me the property
[15:48.920 --> 15:52.360]  back and then we'll give you your money back.
[15:52.360 --> 15:58.200]  And they said, no, no, no, no, no, you have to give me the money back first so I can secure
[15:58.200 --> 16:00.960]  another location.
[16:00.960 --> 16:03.280]  And they sued.
[16:03.280 --> 16:07.920]  They let this get to the U.S. Supreme.
[16:07.920 --> 16:17.800]  And the U.S. Supreme came in and cleaned Wells Fargo's clock, not just Wells Fargo.
[16:17.800 --> 16:28.440]  They said to every bank out there, if someone rescinds a mortgage, you have to immediately
[16:28.440 --> 16:33.400]  give them back every penny they paid you.
[16:33.400 --> 16:39.200]  Once you've given them back every penny, then they have to return the property to you, not
[16:39.200 --> 16:40.200]  the other way around.
[16:40.200 --> 16:46.320]  Because if it was the other way around, the individual would be left, would have to give
[16:46.320 --> 16:50.760]  you the property, and then they'd be left with no property at all, no place to live,
[16:50.760 --> 16:54.840]  while you decide whether or not you're going to release the funds they have coming to them.
[16:54.840 --> 16:56.800]  Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side.
[16:56.800 --> 17:00.600]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[17:00.600 --> 17:06.600]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.600 --> 17:11.360]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.360 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:22.440]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[17:22.440 --> 17:25.600]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.600 --> 17:30.600]  Logo Swedeo Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.600 --> 17:31.600]  we reject.
[17:31.600 --> 17:36.840]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.840 --> 17:40.040]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:40.040 --> 17:45.960]  When you order from LogoSwedeoNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:45.960 --> 17:47.600]  quality radio.
[17:47.600 --> 17:51.920]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.920 --> 17:57.160]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:57.160 --> 17:59.120]  increase your income.
[17:59.120 --> 18:01.280]  Order now.
[18:01.280 --> 18:05.600]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[18:05.600 --> 18:11.400]  Word? Then tune in to LogoSwedeoNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8-10pm Central Time for
[18:11.400 --> 18:16.680]  Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy
[18:16.680 --> 18:17.680]  2.15.
[18:17.680 --> 18:22.760]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[18:22.760 --> 18:25.160]  dividing the word of truth.
[18:25.160 --> 18:29.160]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[18:29.160 --> 18:32.480]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[18:32.480 --> 18:37.080]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[18:37.080 --> 18:39.480]  and Christian character development.
[18:39.480 --> 18:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:44.000 --> 18:48.320]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.320 --> 18:50.600]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[18:50.600 --> 18:57.720]  So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogoSwedeoNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8-10pm to inspire and motivate
[18:57.720 --> 19:04.720]  your studies of the Scriptures.
[19:27.720 --> 19:57.040]  Okay,
[19:57.040 --> 19:58.040]  we are back.
[19:58.040 --> 20:02.040]  Randy Calderon, Brett Fountain, Rubella Radio on this...
[20:02.040 --> 20:04.160]  What day is it, Brett?
[20:04.160 --> 20:08.280]  We've got the 16th of March, 2023.
[20:08.280 --> 20:09.280]  There you go.
[20:09.280 --> 20:13.000]  Okay, and we were talking about the Jazz and Ascii case.
[20:13.000 --> 20:23.720]  The Jazz and Ascii case was 99,000 and these moronic lawyers took it all the way to the
[20:23.720 --> 20:31.120]  Supreme and because they didn't necessarily do just what makes sense.
[20:31.120 --> 20:33.720]  Sometimes they get their egos involved, right?
[20:33.720 --> 20:40.720]  No, a professional wouldn't do that.
[20:40.720 --> 20:51.320]  So the federal Supreme Court said to every bank in the country, if someone rescinds
[20:51.320 --> 20:59.840]  a mortgage, you must immediately give them back every time they gave you.
[20:59.840 --> 21:08.160]  Now what they went on to say that rescinding a mortgage was like removing to the federal
[21:08.160 --> 21:10.360]  court.
[21:10.360 --> 21:16.000]  When you remove to the federal court, you don't file a motion to remove.
[21:16.000 --> 21:17.160]  You remove.
[21:17.160 --> 21:19.920]  You have that power.
[21:19.920 --> 21:25.480]  So you file a notice of removal and the thing is removed.
[21:25.480 --> 21:27.560]  Nobody can challenge that.
[21:27.560 --> 21:28.560]  It's removed.
[21:28.560 --> 21:35.520]  Once it gets to the federal court, you can challenge the removal in the federal court.
[21:35.520 --> 21:39.680]  And the court said that this was the same way.
[21:39.680 --> 21:44.480]  When someone files a notice of rescission, it is rescinded.
[21:44.480 --> 21:47.840]  Even the filer can't undo it.
[21:47.840 --> 21:50.360]  It's a done deal.
[21:50.360 --> 21:54.040]  It really stuck it to the banks on rescission.
[21:54.040 --> 21:59.400]  So I took my qualified written request and I added a notice of rescission to the bottom
[21:59.400 --> 22:02.920]  of it just for Jezanowski.
[22:02.920 --> 22:06.560]  But the question was, who was the moron?
[22:06.560 --> 22:11.480]  Who let that get to the Supreme?
[22:11.480 --> 22:19.720]  And in Brett's case, it's a traffic ticket.
[22:19.720 --> 22:20.720]  Make this thing up.
[22:20.720 --> 22:27.120]  You know, I'm the district, federal district judge, guys, this is a traffic ticket.
[22:27.120 --> 22:30.080]  I got serious business.
[22:30.080 --> 22:32.280]  Why am I dealing with a traffic ticket?
[22:32.280 --> 22:35.400]  Yeah, they're going to make it go away.
[22:35.400 --> 22:37.000]  But sir, we already did.
[22:37.000 --> 22:41.320]  He's still coming after us.
[22:41.320 --> 22:45.560]  He's the district judge is going to say, I don't care.
[22:45.560 --> 22:47.600]  It's your problem.
[22:47.600 --> 22:50.280]  Fix it.
[22:50.280 --> 22:56.960]  So we need to learn how to be real penises in the anises.
[22:56.960 --> 22:59.840]  Is that improper to say on the air, Brett?
[22:59.840 --> 23:06.440]  How about, let's say, let's turn on the caller board and see if there's anybody that has
[23:06.440 --> 23:09.240]  some questions and comments.
[23:09.240 --> 23:15.360]  Call the call boards on, I call in number 512-646-1984.
[23:15.360 --> 23:21.360]  But I do like this idea of just beating up the federal courts.
[23:21.360 --> 23:23.840]  We're the only ones who can do it.
[23:23.840 --> 23:28.160]  The lawyers can't, they're terrified of these federal judges.
[23:28.160 --> 23:33.480]  The only ones who are not, and that's part of the reason they hate process because we're
[23:33.480 --> 23:35.240]  not terrified of them.
[23:35.240 --> 23:43.160]  Judge McBride, I found a petition to declare toward judgment and Locklord, one of the biggest
[23:43.160 --> 23:48.840]  law firms in the country, their lawyer filed a motion to dismiss for failure of state of
[23:48.840 --> 23:53.480]  claim which covered can be heard, can be had.
[23:53.480 --> 23:57.720]  And the judge dismissed it for failure of state of claim which covered can be had.
[23:57.720 --> 24:03.280]  But it was a petition for declared toward judgment.
[24:03.280 --> 24:07.320]  There are no claims.
[24:07.320 --> 24:13.520]  I immediately filed criminal charges with a special agent in charge of the local FBI
[24:13.520 --> 24:16.520]  against Judge McBride.
[24:16.520 --> 24:19.000]  Oh, that was a hoot.
[24:19.000 --> 24:26.240]  I had three other people file that same, my client in that base just walked away.
[24:26.240 --> 24:27.400]  So I couldn't pursue.
[24:27.400 --> 24:33.000]  I had three other people file that same case and Judge McBride did not dismiss a one of
[24:33.000 --> 24:34.000]  them.
[24:34.000 --> 24:41.280]  I don't know what the U.S. Attorney told him, but he got his attention.
[24:41.280 --> 24:47.320]  So anyway, only the process can do that to him.
[24:47.320 --> 24:53.600]  No lawyer in his right professional mind would have stood up to the federal judge, 99-year-old
[24:53.600 --> 25:00.000]  federal Judge McBride, he's a real cantankerous, I called him a stinker, that's the worst
[25:00.000 --> 25:03.520]  I could call a federal judge.
[25:03.520 --> 25:05.400]  But that changed his position.
[25:05.400 --> 25:07.760]  He didn't do that anymore.
[25:07.760 --> 25:08.760]  Only we can do it.
[25:08.760 --> 25:15.000]  You and I did the pro se litigants.
[25:15.000 --> 25:16.000]  You called him a stinker.
[25:16.000 --> 25:17.000]  I called him on the air.
[25:17.000 --> 25:18.000]  No on the air.
[25:18.000 --> 25:27.960]  I didn't do it on the on the criminal complaint, I called him a criminal and wanted him to
[25:27.960 --> 25:28.960]  arrest him.
[25:28.960 --> 25:32.560]  But because my client backed up, I didn't go ahead and pursue it all the way through
[25:32.560 --> 25:37.640]  the U.S. Attorney like I did in Florida with the IRS agent.
[25:37.640 --> 25:41.040]  We pursued that one.
[25:41.040 --> 25:42.600]  They did the standard stuff.
[25:42.600 --> 25:51.520]  I went to the court and said in a courtroom while they were having these cattle call hearings
[25:51.520 --> 25:55.440]  where they're bringing in guys who've been arrested, same thing they do in the lower
[25:55.440 --> 26:02.800]  courts and called the U.S. Marshal over the bailiff and told him my name and instructed
[26:02.800 --> 26:05.480]  the judge that I have business with the court.
[26:05.480 --> 26:07.640]  He said, may I tell the judge in nature the business?
[26:07.640 --> 26:08.640]  No, you may not.
[26:08.640 --> 26:10.760]  I have business with the court and it's none of yours.
[26:10.760 --> 26:12.160]  I went and sat down.
[26:12.160 --> 26:16.520]  Well, it was female and she didn't tell the judge and the judge was finishing the hearing
[26:16.520 --> 26:23.160]  and dismissing the hearing and I stood up and said, your honor, boy, this bailiff was
[26:23.160 --> 26:29.800]  furious, ran over to me and I said, your honor, can you call your bulldog off here?
[26:29.800 --> 26:34.240]  She called the bailiff back and she said, what can I do for you?
[26:34.240 --> 26:37.160]  I said, your honor, I have business with the court.
[26:37.160 --> 26:42.760]  Well, she said, then she said, everybody else, anyone who wants to go, you can if you want
[26:42.760 --> 26:44.240]  to stay, you can.
[26:44.240 --> 26:51.320]  But apparently we have someone who has business with the court and she said, well, Mr. Kelton,
[26:51.320 --> 26:57.320]  that is the nature of your business and I fabricated this whopper.
[26:57.320 --> 27:08.600]  I told her that I was a radio talk show host out of Austin and I did a show on legal reform
[27:08.600 --> 27:15.040]  and I get people calling in all the time complaining about the courts and I got more complaints
[27:15.040 --> 27:22.440]  about this court in Fort Lauderdale than any other court in the nation and they told me
[27:22.440 --> 27:29.640]  how horrible it was and how the judges never followed law and frankly, your honor, I didn't
[27:29.640 --> 27:31.640]  believe that.
[27:31.640 --> 27:37.920]  So I come down here to check it out myself and I've been watching the court and this
[27:37.920 --> 27:39.880]  seems just fine.
[27:39.880 --> 27:46.280]  What I would like you to do is allow me to bring in my camera crew and videotape the
[27:46.280 --> 27:51.400]  court because I got more complaints about this court than any other and I want to be
[27:51.400 --> 27:58.160]  able to show the public how you handle people in court so that you'll know they're not
[27:58.160 --> 28:02.240]  as corrupt as everybody says they are.
[28:02.240 --> 28:10.520]  I had about five U.S. Marshals and they're just itching to get me by the throat.
[28:10.520 --> 28:14.760]  And the judge said, well, no, Mr. Kelton, we don't allow any cameras in the courtroom.
[28:14.760 --> 28:16.400]  Oh, that's okay, Judge.
[28:16.400 --> 28:17.400]  We won't get in the way.
[28:17.400 --> 28:18.720]  We'll stand back there in the back.
[28:18.720 --> 28:22.720]  We won't bother anybody.
[28:22.720 --> 28:23.720]  And I'm gay.
[28:23.720 --> 28:24.720]  I'm so cooperate.
[28:24.720 --> 28:41.480]  We were down there after a IRS agent and we had a cameraman who was a little wild.
[28:41.480 --> 28:45.600]  I thought he's going to get us all beaten into unconsciousness and I wound up getting
[28:45.600 --> 28:50.400]  hold of the head U.S. Marshal and he was actually one of us.
[28:50.400 --> 28:54.640]  He said, when we talked to him about what we do and he said, you know, there's only one
[28:54.640 --> 28:58.200]  thing that I want to see.
[28:58.200 --> 29:03.080]  I want to see all of these judges act in accordance with the Constitution.
[29:03.080 --> 29:04.080]  Deborah was there.
[29:04.080 --> 29:06.080]  Deborah, are you there?
[29:06.080 --> 29:07.080]  She's kind of there in the background.
[29:07.080 --> 29:14.840]  She was there when we did that and Deborah said, well, you're one of us.
[29:14.840 --> 29:15.840]  He said, no, I'm not.
[29:15.840 --> 29:17.040]  Yeah, you're one of us.
[29:17.040 --> 29:18.440]  She said, yeah, you're one of us.
[29:18.440 --> 29:19.440]  This is all we want.
[29:19.440 --> 29:21.440]  This is why we're here.
[29:21.440 --> 29:25.440]  It was great to talk to him.
[29:25.440 --> 29:34.000]  But they wound up firing the IRS agent because the U.S. attorney called me and told me, I
[29:34.000 --> 29:38.760]  tried to get to the grand jury again, that he would charge me with jury tampering.
[29:38.760 --> 29:40.520]  I told him, knock yourself out.
[29:40.520 --> 29:42.040]  You charge me jury tampering.
[29:42.040 --> 29:43.800]  I'll charge you with obstruction.
[29:43.800 --> 29:47.000]  We'll see how this works out for you.
[29:47.000 --> 29:48.000]  Click.
[29:48.000 --> 29:51.240]  The next day they fired the IRS agent.
[29:51.240 --> 29:53.240]  We can take them on and it's great fun.
[29:53.240 --> 29:55.360]  We do have our phone lines open.
[29:55.360 --> 29:57.480]  We don't have any calls.
[29:57.480 --> 29:58.480]  Is everybody asleep?
[29:58.480 --> 30:01.760]  We'll be right back.
[30:01.760 --> 30:05.880]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:05.880 --> 30:10.480]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your
[30:10.480 --> 30:11.480]  secrets.
[30:11.480 --> 30:15.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:15.840 --> 30:17.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.440 --> 30:21.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.040 --> 30:25.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.840 --> 30:27.280]  So protect your rights.
[30:27.280 --> 30:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:33.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.600 --> 30:37.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.920 --> 30:41.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.400 --> 30:45.080]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.080 --> 30:49.880]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:49.880 --> 30:51.280]  your personal information.
[30:51.280 --> 30:54.320]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.320 --> 30:56.000]  It's not an idle question.
[30:56.000 --> 31:01.120]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was
[31:01.120 --> 31:03.520]  breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:03.520 --> 31:07.400]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:07.400 --> 31:12.000]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:12.000 --> 31:15.440]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals
[31:15.440 --> 31:16.440]  to see.
[31:16.440 --> 31:17.920]  The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.920 --> 31:21.000]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.000 --> 31:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.000 --> 31:30.840]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.840 --> 31:31.840]  I lost my son.
[31:31.840 --> 31:32.840]  My nephew.
[31:32.840 --> 31:33.840]  My uncle.
[31:33.840 --> 31:34.840]  My son.
[31:34.840 --> 31:35.840]  On September 11, 2001.
[31:35.840 --> 31:39.080]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:39.080 --> 31:43.320]  Full Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.320 --> 31:47.080]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[31:47.080 --> 31:51.920]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[31:51.920 --> 31:52.920]  to the story.
[31:52.920 --> 31:54.320]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:54.320 --> 31:55.320]  My uncle.
[31:55.320 --> 31:56.320]  My nephew.
[31:56.320 --> 31:57.320]  My son.
[31:57.320 --> 31:58.320]  Go to building what.org.
[31:58.320 --> 31:59.320]  Why it fell.
[31:59.320 --> 32:00.320]  Why it matters.
[32:00.320 --> 32:01.320]  And what you can do.
[32:01.320 --> 32:05.320]  Rula Law Radio is proud to offer the Rula Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:05.320 --> 32:09.240]  In today's America, we live in a us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever
[32:09.240 --> 32:13.200]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.200 --> 32:16.240]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.240 --> 32:20.280]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.280 --> 32:24.120]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.120 --> 32:26.000]  our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.480]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rula Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.480 --> 32:33.240]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.240 --> 32:35.600]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.600 --> 32:39.600]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RulaLawRadio.com and
[32:39.600 --> 32:40.920]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.920 --> 32:44.320]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.320 --> 32:47.920]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:47.920 --> 32:51.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RulaLawRadio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:02.000]  After your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.000 --> 33:53.600]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelham, Brett Count and RulaLawRadio, and there is some indication
[33:53.600 --> 33:59.680]  that we may have an archive running, we're trying to get that taken care of.
[33:59.680 --> 34:10.440]  So in the meantime, I will keep going, talk about what I am trying to make a date, always
[34:10.440 --> 34:12.440]  forget the date.
[34:12.440 --> 34:25.960]  This is the 16th day of March, 2023, and we started out talking about the federal courts
[34:25.960 --> 34:34.160]  and how the only ones who can beat them up are you and I, the lawyers can't do it, lawyers
[34:34.160 --> 34:39.960]  are terrified of the courts, the only ones who don't have to be afraid of them are you
[34:39.960 --> 34:49.240]  and I, and Brett is taking on the federal courts from the perspective of a traffic ticket.
[34:49.240 --> 34:57.280]  If I was a traffic ticket, a case in the federal, he brings it to the federal court
[34:57.280 --> 35:05.720]  and they are doing their standard dance round, dance round, and what they are not getting
[35:05.720 --> 35:13.200]  is not a lawyer whose bar card they can steal, they can't screw him over, they can't screw
[35:13.200 --> 35:18.680]  his client over, so he's not afraid of them, he doesn't need to be afraid of them.
[35:18.680 --> 35:24.560]  And what has been my experience with them is when they get someone like that, they have
[35:24.560 --> 35:28.120]  no idea how to deal with them.
[35:28.120 --> 35:33.120]  They are so accustomed to doing the same things over and over, you file a case in the federal
[35:33.120 --> 35:38.120]  court and the first thing they do is sign a magistrate, you object to the magistrate,
[35:38.120 --> 35:40.800]  they ignore the objection.
[35:40.800 --> 35:48.800]  You file a petition for real demand damage, they ask the court to order them to put this
[35:48.800 --> 35:54.760]  before the district judge, they ignore it, they pay absolutely no attention to the rule
[35:54.760 --> 35:55.760]  of law.
[35:55.760 --> 35:58.760]  Yep, check both of those boxes, that's what happened.
[35:58.760 --> 36:07.520]  They don't care, they just don't care, so we have to find a way to get to it.
[36:07.520 --> 36:17.560]  If the federal, if magistrate has not met the requirements for sitting as a magistrate,
[36:17.560 --> 36:24.360]  couldn't you charge the magistrate with impersonating a public official and sue the magistrate
[36:24.360 --> 36:25.360]  personally?
[36:25.360 --> 36:33.280]  The magistrate is going to claim that the magistrate has immunity.
[36:33.280 --> 36:39.160]  And you're going to say, well, if you were, had a subcommittee jurisdiction or standing
[36:39.160 --> 36:47.200]  to sit in the case, maybe you would have, but you don't have standing.
[36:47.200 --> 36:56.680]  I think we need to put together a set of standard documents for this.
[36:56.680 --> 37:00.840]  Always this will be the same.
[37:00.840 --> 37:09.560]  You file a suit in the federal court, the federal court automatically appoints a magistrate,
[37:09.560 --> 37:16.120]  you object to the magistrate, they ignore your objection and act like you didn't object
[37:16.120 --> 37:17.680]  and just keep going.
[37:17.680 --> 37:25.000]  Well, I agree there should be some standard documents, however, I don't see success yet,
[37:25.000 --> 37:28.640]  so I hesitate to put it out there and say, here, everybody do this.
[37:28.640 --> 37:34.600]  No, it's not about success, it's about harassment.
[37:34.600 --> 37:37.120]  Okay, well, that makes sense.
[37:37.120 --> 37:38.720]  Well, that's worth something too.
[37:38.720 --> 37:42.360]  Yeah, they're going to rule against us out of hand.
[37:42.360 --> 37:47.240]  And then you go after the ones who ruled against us.
[37:47.240 --> 37:51.520]  They use that kind of garbage on us.
[37:51.520 --> 37:55.600]  What's to keep us from doing it to them, what's to keep us from filing criminal charges against
[37:55.600 --> 38:04.960]  the magistrate for impersonating a federal judge and judicial misconduct complaint.
[38:04.960 --> 38:12.000]  And then when the US attorney refuses to give it to the grand jury, then you file against
[38:12.000 --> 38:19.240]  the US attorney with the attorney general in DC.
[38:19.240 --> 38:20.320]  This is all pretty straightforward.
[38:20.320 --> 38:24.000]  The exact same thing happens every single time.
[38:24.000 --> 38:25.000]  Yep.
[38:25.000 --> 38:29.880]  All you got to do is fill in the names and the dates and the rest of it's the same.
[38:29.880 --> 38:30.880]  Maybe case number.
[38:30.880 --> 38:37.960]  And the judicial, the judicial conduct complaint against the district judge for allowing that
[38:37.960 --> 38:46.560]  magistrate to impersonate him in his court and then accuse him of acting in concert
[38:46.560 --> 38:48.680]  and collusion.
[38:48.680 --> 38:53.960]  We can build a whole set of documents that are, there's only one set of facts.
[38:53.960 --> 39:04.440]  You file suit, magistrate judge, in the lawsuit, when you filed it, there was a place to agree
[39:04.440 --> 39:05.920]  to a magistrate judge.
[39:05.920 --> 39:11.760]  And if you didn't file that, if you didn't check that, they will send you a notice asking
[39:11.760 --> 39:20.680]  you to agree to a magistrate judge and you file an objection to it.
[39:20.680 --> 39:22.480]  Always exactly the same.
[39:22.480 --> 39:27.840]  So we can build a set of documents that people just start dumping on them every time they
[39:27.840 --> 39:29.840]  file suit.
[39:29.840 --> 39:35.160]  Judicial conduct complaints, arguments against the US attorney.
[39:35.160 --> 39:43.480]  Because attorneys become US attorneys so that after they get out of that office, then go
[39:43.480 --> 39:46.000]  out and make big money.
[39:46.000 --> 39:55.280]  How big money are they going to make if they got tier 15 or grievances against them?
[39:55.280 --> 40:01.640]  No law firms going to hire these guys.
[40:01.640 --> 40:04.760]  Maybe it's time we kind of campaigned on that.
[40:04.760 --> 40:08.280]  I'm getting ready to file a suit that will go to the feds.
[40:08.280 --> 40:11.560]  I've got a couple of them that are going to go to the feds.
[40:11.560 --> 40:20.800]  I'll start putting together these documents and we can start beating them up.
[40:20.800 --> 40:30.320]  So in your case, what steps have they violated specifically relative to this?
[40:30.320 --> 40:35.600]  But how did you bring this objection to them?
[40:35.600 --> 40:43.600]  Well there have been a lot of objections but in this, so we've got everything that I'm
[40:43.600 --> 40:53.440]  complaining about right now is facts that are shown in the official court clerk's records.
[40:53.440 --> 40:56.040]  So that I don't have to swear to anything.
[40:56.040 --> 41:01.200]  At least don't have to be notarized affidavits or anything, verified, sworn, nothing.
[41:01.200 --> 41:07.480]  All I have to do is say, hey, rules of evidence 201 says if this is an indisputable fact such
[41:07.480 --> 41:12.440]  as take a look at the court record, then it's mandatory judicial notice.
[41:12.440 --> 41:15.680]  So that's my way of complaining about it.
[41:15.680 --> 41:21.960]  And the things that I'm complaining about are that the record shows that the magistrate
[41:21.960 --> 41:27.640]  judges assertion that she has authority to involve herself was based on consent of the
[41:27.640 --> 41:29.320]  parties.
[41:29.320 --> 41:33.880]  And the official record shows there was no consent of any party.
[41:33.880 --> 41:41.360]  The official record shows there was no opportunity provided for any party to give consent.
[41:41.360 --> 41:47.280]  And so then my conclusion is, I mean that's pretty simple straightforward, right?
[41:47.280 --> 41:56.440]  My conclusion is that she failed to speak with candor before this honorable court.
[41:56.440 --> 41:59.440]  We'll get to the part about her not having authority, but I wanted to go ahead and catch
[41:59.440 --> 42:01.600]  that one while we're on it.
[42:01.600 --> 42:06.480]  Then I went ahead to some other facts and said, so then the district judge jumps in
[42:06.480 --> 42:08.480]  and he makes a different assertion.
[42:08.480 --> 42:16.760]  He asserts that that magistrates judges authority to involve herself was under a different site.
[42:16.760 --> 42:21.360]  Subsection B of that same 636.
[42:21.360 --> 42:23.120]  And wow, that's vague and broad.
[42:23.120 --> 42:27.760]  I accused him of being vague and broad, comprising a number of situations.
[42:27.760 --> 42:33.960]  The public register for legislation comprising title 28 US code 636 shows that subsection
[42:33.960 --> 42:41.640]  B and subsection D are quite different in terms of the prerequisite situational contexts.
[42:41.640 --> 42:51.200]  So the same situation that would cause somebody to be authorized in one case doesn't fit.
[42:51.200 --> 42:56.240]  You can't just say, oh, well, it was kind of the same.
[42:56.240 --> 42:57.240]  No.
[42:57.240 --> 43:03.280]  The judge failed to rule on the facts and law before the court, but made up his own facts
[43:03.280 --> 43:04.280]  and law.
[43:04.280 --> 43:05.280]  Yeah.
[43:05.280 --> 43:06.280]  And that.
[43:06.280 --> 43:07.280]  Yeah.
[43:07.280 --> 43:08.280]  Oh, wait till you see that.
[43:08.280 --> 43:16.040]  Yeah, another thing he did was one issue that I had brought up was that this judge has no
[43:16.040 --> 43:20.720]  this magistrate judge has no lawful authority to be involved at all.
[43:20.720 --> 43:25.800]  She's everything she does is ultra various as without authority.
[43:25.800 --> 43:33.160]  And this district judge jumped in and he found some case law that says litigants don't get
[43:33.160 --> 43:36.320]  a chance to pick and choose which judge they want.
[43:36.320 --> 43:39.960]  So he's harping on that as if that were my issue.
[43:39.960 --> 43:46.400]  I didn't say I want to pick and choose which judge I get, I said, she's asserting to have
[43:46.400 --> 43:50.920]  authority based on consent of the parties and she doesn't have it.
[43:50.920 --> 43:56.520]  All right, anyway, we're just about to go to sponsors.
[43:56.520 --> 43:59.960]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[43:59.960 --> 44:00.960]  I love logos.
[44:00.960 --> 44:04.280]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.280 --> 44:07.120]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:07.120 --> 44:08.320]  I need my truth fix.
[44:08.320 --> 44:12.960]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:12.960 --> 44:16.760]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[44:16.760 --> 44:20.160]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[44:20.160 --> 44:21.840]  How can I help logos?
[44:21.840 --> 44:23.640]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:23.640 --> 44:26.640]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[44:26.640 --> 44:29.240]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.240 --> 44:31.240]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.240 --> 44:37.600]  Now go to LogosRegulnetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.600 --> 44:43.240]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.240 --> 44:44.240]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.240 --> 44:45.240]  No.
[44:45.240 --> 44:47.240]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.240 --> 44:48.240]  No.
[44:48.240 --> 44:49.240]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.240 --> 44:50.240]  No.
[44:50.240 --> 44:51.240]  I mean, yes.
[44:51.240 --> 44:55.720]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[44:55.720 --> 44:56.720]  Thank you so much.
[44:56.720 --> 44:58.200]  We are welcome.
[44:58.200 --> 45:01.120]  Happy holidays, logos.
[45:01.120 --> 45:04.320]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.320 --> 45:11.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.120 --> 45:14.120]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.120 --> 45:18.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.840 --> 45:23.080]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.080 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.680 --> 45:39.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.200 --> 45:43.520]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.520 --> 45:49.720]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.720 --> 45:52.320]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.320 --> 46:00.320]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:53.320 --> 46:59.320]  Watch in the spot spot.
[47:02.320 --> 47:07.320]  The first time there's an addiction, the hard work can leave you cold as nails.
[47:07.320 --> 47:13.320]  A bit of hostility, touch and quity, heavy loads of taping on scales.
[47:13.320 --> 47:19.320]  The time is colliding with the conflict, you find out after a while.
[47:19.320 --> 47:24.320]  It's not your moral standard, it's your patience that's on trial.
[47:24.320 --> 47:30.320]  Watch in the spot spot.
[47:30.320 --> 47:35.320]  Watch in the spot spot.
[47:35.320 --> 47:41.320]  Watch in the spot spot.
[47:41.320 --> 47:44.320]  Watch in the spot spot.
[47:44.320 --> 47:50.320]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and I'm having the same
[47:50.320 --> 47:52.320]  problem every segment.
[47:52.320 --> 47:58.320]  Brett tells me to announce the date, but he never tells me what year it is.
[47:58.320 --> 48:02.320]  That was just 15 minutes ago.
[48:02.320 --> 48:04.320]  Oh, that.
[48:04.320 --> 48:12.320]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, on this, the 16th day of March, 2023.
[48:12.320 --> 48:25.320]  And we were talking about how to jerk around the federal courts, especially federal magistrates.
[48:25.320 --> 48:27.320]  I think we need to put together a program.
[48:27.320 --> 48:30.320]  Oh, by the way, we do have the phone lines on.
[48:30.320 --> 48:33.320]  I thought I had them on earlier, but I think I turned them on.
[48:33.320 --> 48:35.320]  These things are, they cycle.
[48:35.320 --> 48:41.320]  So I hit the on button and execute and I think Brett was hitting it at the same time.
[48:41.320 --> 48:44.320]  So we wound up turning them on and then right back off again.
[48:44.320 --> 48:46.320]  So they're on right now.
[48:46.320 --> 48:48.320]  At least my system says they are.
[48:48.320 --> 48:51.320]  And I hit refresh like I was instructed to do.
[48:51.320 --> 48:53.320]  And it shows that the phones are on.
[48:53.320 --> 48:59.320]  So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call 940.
[48:59.320 --> 49:02.320]  No, don't call 940.
[49:02.320 --> 49:04.320]  Brett, are you giving your wife?
[49:04.320 --> 49:07.320]  I've only said this for 15 years.
[49:07.320 --> 49:13.320]  Five, one, two, six, four, six, 1984.
[49:13.320 --> 49:18.320]  I need, well, I was, I was having some throat problems before the show started.
[49:18.320 --> 49:22.320]  And I found the perfect medicine.
[49:22.320 --> 49:30.320]  It's an alcohol, an alcohol tincture of barley and hops.
[49:30.320 --> 49:31.320]  How about that?
[49:31.320 --> 49:33.320]  Anyway, yeah.
[49:33.320 --> 49:35.320]  Anyway, that worked pretty good.
[49:35.320 --> 49:38.320]  I don't know if I'm coughing or I do any of that kind of stuff.
[49:38.320 --> 49:42.320]  But I'm, it took a little more than I expected.
[49:42.320 --> 49:44.320]  So I probably don't know what I'm doing.
[49:44.320 --> 49:47.320]  Anyway, we're talking about going after the fence.
[49:47.320 --> 49:56.320]  And we were talking about the issue of a magistrate judge's involvement, period, just being involved.
[49:56.320 --> 50:01.320]  Because the law says that they need to have a certain pre-trial matter.
[50:01.320 --> 50:06.320]  That is designated to them or assigned to them by the district judge.
[50:06.320 --> 50:10.320]  It has to be some matter that is currently before the court.
[50:10.320 --> 50:14.320]  That's what they're allowed to put over to a magistrate judge.
[50:14.320 --> 50:16.320]  He can say, hey, I need some help with this.
[50:16.320 --> 50:17.320]  Can you help me with my load?
[50:17.320 --> 50:20.320]  There's this issue right here.
[50:20.320 --> 50:21.320]  Wait a minute.
[50:21.320 --> 50:25.320]  He cannot assign an entire case.
[50:25.320 --> 50:30.320]  Is that an administrative act?
[50:30.320 --> 50:32.320]  I don't know if it is or not.
[50:32.320 --> 50:36.320]  It's not saying that it's his duty that he has to assign it.
[50:36.320 --> 50:41.320]  But the involvement has to be authorized by that.
[50:41.320 --> 50:44.320]  It's not a judicial determination.
[50:44.320 --> 50:49.320]  I mean, it's kind of like buying toilet paper.
[50:49.320 --> 50:53.320]  Well, but it's not something he's required to do.
[50:53.320 --> 50:55.320]  You sign a judge.
[50:55.320 --> 50:56.320]  No, he doesn't have to.
[50:56.320 --> 51:02.320]  In the state, we have somebody who assigns judges,
[51:02.320 --> 51:05.320]  but he's an administrative judge.
[51:05.320 --> 51:06.320]  This is an administrative action.
[51:06.320 --> 51:07.320]  District judge?
[51:07.320 --> 51:08.320]  No, the district judge.
[51:08.320 --> 51:10.320]  Yes, it might be administrative in nature,
[51:10.320 --> 51:14.320]  but it's not something that you could say this is his ministerial duty.
[51:14.320 --> 51:20.320]  Because he could, without taking this extra step of assigning some matter
[51:20.320 --> 51:23.320]  to some magistrate judge, he could just handle it himself.
[51:23.320 --> 51:24.320]  He's the district judge.
[51:24.320 --> 51:25.320]  It's his job.
[51:25.320 --> 51:26.320]  Yeah.
[51:26.320 --> 51:35.320]  But the assigning of a magistrate judge is not a judicial act.
[51:35.320 --> 51:38.320]  It's like he could buy toilet paper if he wants to or not.
[51:38.320 --> 51:40.320]  That's not judicial.
[51:40.320 --> 51:43.320]  That doesn't have anything to do with the adjudication of cases.
[51:43.320 --> 51:45.320]  Assigning a judge.
[51:45.320 --> 51:47.320]  You're going to know immunities.
[51:47.320 --> 51:54.320]  I'm saying that's an administrative act for which he should have no immunity.
[51:54.320 --> 51:56.320]  Gotcha.
[51:56.320 --> 52:01.320]  So there's another issue here that I'm addressing.
[52:01.320 --> 52:10.320]  Not only the issue of the magistrate judge being involved at all.
[52:10.320 --> 52:14.320]  And that's a very common issue, as you mentioned,
[52:14.320 --> 52:19.320]  and a secondary issue here, which is that the magistrate judge lied.
[52:19.320 --> 52:22.320]  That's probably not as common of an issue.
[52:22.320 --> 52:27.320]  But another issue that I'm addressing, I imagine, is very common.
[52:27.320 --> 52:33.320]  The law says that a magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings
[52:33.320 --> 52:42.320]  when assigned without the party's consent to hear a pretrial matter dispositive of a claim.
[52:42.320 --> 52:43.320]  Okay.
[52:43.320 --> 52:50.320]  Is that something for which the judge has discretion?
[52:50.320 --> 52:51.320]  No.
[52:51.320 --> 52:57.320]  Must promptly conduct the required proceedings when assigned.
[52:57.320 --> 53:02.320]  So this is something that the magistrate judge had absolutely no wiggle room.
[53:02.320 --> 53:04.320]  Must conduct those proceedings.
[53:04.320 --> 53:09.320]  And it goes on to talk about including evidentiary proceedings.
[53:09.320 --> 53:14.320]  So if the judge wants to rule, sorry.
[53:14.320 --> 53:23.320]  You could sue both the federal judge and the magistrate for conspiring together to do that.
[53:23.320 --> 53:26.320]  Well, they obviously did.
[53:26.320 --> 53:32.320]  The district judge improperly appointed the magistrate judge.
[53:32.320 --> 53:33.320]  No.
[53:33.320 --> 53:34.320]  So that the magistrate judge...
[53:34.320 --> 53:35.320]  The district judge got nothing.
[53:35.320 --> 53:37.320]  Only adopted after it was all done.
[53:37.320 --> 53:43.320]  He just signed off on it and said it's all good.
[53:43.320 --> 53:47.320]  So she acted without an order from the judge.
[53:47.320 --> 53:50.320]  Zero, zero input from the district judge.
[53:50.320 --> 53:57.320]  And then the judge acted in concert and collusion with the corporal act after the fact.
[53:57.320 --> 54:02.320]  He should have taken action to mitigate the harm she caused.
[54:02.320 --> 54:12.320]  But instead, he condoned it and facilitated the ongoing for this to happen again.
[54:12.320 --> 54:15.320]  That sounds like recap.
[54:15.320 --> 54:18.320]  Has he done this more than once?
[54:18.320 --> 54:20.320]  Records requests.
[54:20.320 --> 54:29.320]  So the facts are that the official court record shows that the magistrate judge e-filed a
[54:29.320 --> 54:34.320]  dispositive document report and recommendations.
[54:34.320 --> 54:40.320]  Now, there's no such thing as report and recommendations documents except for in their imagination.
[54:40.320 --> 54:41.320]  It's kind of like these magistrations.
[54:41.320 --> 54:45.320]  There's no such thing as report and recommendations.
[54:45.320 --> 54:51.320]  There's such a thing as findings of fact and recommendations which a magistrate judge would
[54:51.320 --> 54:56.320]  be able to prepare for the district judge to review.
[54:56.320 --> 54:58.320]  But she didn't.
[54:58.320 --> 55:03.320]  Findings of fact and recommendations would have to be based on those required proceedings
[55:03.320 --> 55:06.320]  that she skipped.
[55:06.320 --> 55:13.320]  How do you find facts without and have evidentiary hearings without actually doing anything?
[55:13.320 --> 55:17.320]  You just imagine it all and no.
[55:17.320 --> 55:23.320]  So the court record shows that she filed this document that's bogus.
[55:23.320 --> 55:32.320]  The court record shows that she was never assigned to hear any pretrial matter and that she was,
[55:32.320 --> 55:35.320]  she never conducted any of the required proceedings.
[55:35.320 --> 55:42.320]  Well, I don't know about you, but common sense would say that the findings of fact and recommendations
[55:42.320 --> 55:46.320]  are intended to follow the required proceedings.
[55:46.320 --> 55:49.320]  That sounds like due process.
[55:49.320 --> 55:50.320]  Exactly.
[55:50.320 --> 55:53.320]  That's what I'm going after right now.
[55:53.320 --> 55:59.320]  So her document circumvented lawful authorization for her involvement and it circumvented the
[55:59.320 --> 56:03.320]  requirement for whoever would be lawfully authorized.
[56:03.320 --> 56:07.320]  The requirement to promptly conduct those required proceedings.
[56:07.320 --> 56:11.320]  Her document just jumped in front of all that.
[56:11.320 --> 56:15.320]  They're just going to go skip to the end and call it done.
[56:15.320 --> 56:20.320]  You know, every time I go through this, one thing keeps coming back to me.
[56:20.320 --> 56:23.320]  These guys are all criminals and they're all working together.
[56:23.320 --> 56:27.320]  How do we get to someone who doesn't have a dog in the hut?
[56:27.320 --> 56:29.320]  That's tough.
[56:29.320 --> 56:39.320]  And that's this procedure I developed for going to the special agent in charge filing criminal charges with him.
[56:39.320 --> 56:48.320]  So we take the judge and the magistrate and we charge them with acting in concert inclusion
[56:48.320 --> 57:03.320]  and furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice so that the judge may avoid
[57:03.320 --> 57:10.320]  performing under the contract of employment that he has with the feds.
[57:10.320 --> 57:18.320]  And he is only allowed to sit as a judge on good behavior and conspiring with a magistrate
[57:18.320 --> 57:23.320]  to deny you in due process is not good behavior.
[57:23.320 --> 57:38.320]  And that we can claim is a violation of their oath which goes to court warrantal removal.
[57:38.320 --> 57:46.320]  And, okay, we go to the special agent in charge file criminal charges with him against the federal judge.
[57:46.320 --> 57:52.320]  Well, if you're a special agent in charge of the FBI, you finally made it up through the range from the bottom
[57:52.320 --> 57:58.320]  and you're a big shot now and you get somebody who wants you to arrest the judge.
[57:58.320 --> 58:01.320]  Oh, heck, I'm not going to do that.
[58:01.320 --> 58:06.320]  And then when he doesn't, you file against him with the U.S. Attorney.
[58:06.320 --> 58:13.320]  And U.S. Attorney, he's not going to arrest the special agent in charge for not arresting the judge.
[58:13.320 --> 58:19.320]  Then you file against the U.S. Attorney with the grand jury for shielding your criminal complaints
[58:19.320 --> 58:24.320]  against the special agent in charge from the grand jury.
[58:24.320 --> 58:27.320]  Just look so clean.
[58:27.320 --> 58:32.320]  And these are guys who, they didn't have a dog here now.
[58:32.320 --> 58:36.320]  They didn't do any of that crap over that you're originally complaining about.
[58:36.320 --> 58:39.320]  Now we're getting in trouble.
[58:39.320 --> 58:40.320]  Hang on.
[58:40.320 --> 58:45.320]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruevlar Radio with C.A. and on the book of the board.
[58:45.320 --> 58:47.320]  We'll pick you up on the other side.
[58:47.320 --> 59:13.320]  We'll be right back.
[59:17.320 --> 59:24.320]  We'll be right back.
[59:47.320 --> 01:00:01.320]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:01.320 --> 01:00:05.320]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.320 --> 01:00:09.320]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.320 --> 01:00:11.320]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:11.320 --> 01:00:16.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:16.320 --> 01:00:18.320]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:22.320]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.320 --> 01:00:27.320]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.320 --> 01:00:28.320]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:28.320 --> 01:00:32.320]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.320 --> 01:00:33.320]  Privacy.
[01:00:33.320 --> 01:00:35.320]  It's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:38.320]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:42.320]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:45.320]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.320 --> 01:00:49.320]  Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six.
[01:00:49.320 --> 01:00:54.320]  Think of how the number six is implicated in evil as in the biblical 666.
[01:00:54.320 --> 01:00:58.320]  So it would fit right in that the seventh amendment would be about civil trials.
[01:00:58.320 --> 01:01:00.320]  Civil seven? Civil trials? Get it?
[01:01:00.320 --> 01:01:05.320]  Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute,
[01:01:05.320 --> 01:01:07.320]  like the dividing line between properties.
[01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:11.320]  They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs.
[01:01:11.320 --> 01:01:16.320]  The seventh amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters
[01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:19.320]  instead of having a lone judge rule on the case.
[01:01:19.320 --> 01:01:24.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.320 --> 01:01:35.320]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.320 --> 01:01:39.320]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.320 --> 01:01:40.320]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.320 --> 01:01:46.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:02:10.320 --> 01:02:22.320]  Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel 1984 when Winston is threatened with his worst fear?
[01:02:22.320 --> 01:02:26.320]  That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face.
[01:02:26.320 --> 01:02:28.320]  But what if his worst fear was spiders?
[01:02:28.320 --> 01:02:30.320]  Eight-legged spiders, to be exact.
[01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:33.320]  Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual.
[01:02:33.320 --> 01:02:37.320]  That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment.
[01:02:37.320 --> 01:02:44.320]  Our founding fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from creepy, crawly, eight-legged punishments
[01:02:44.320 --> 01:02:48.320]  and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in their day.
[01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:54.320]  The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging excessive fines.
[01:02:54.320 --> 01:03:21.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:24.320 --> 01:03:31.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:03:55.320 --> 01:04:04.320]  Okay, we are back with confidence because Brett actually told me what year it was.
[01:04:04.320 --> 01:04:06.320]  But I forgot.
[01:04:06.320 --> 01:04:08.320]  Okay, this is Thursday.
[01:04:08.320 --> 01:04:12.320]  What day? You didn't tell me what day, Brett.
[01:04:12.320 --> 01:04:15.320]  But I told you the year.
[01:04:15.320 --> 01:04:24.320]  Well, okay, 16th day of March, 2023. And I know that because I pulled up my calendar.
[01:04:24.320 --> 01:04:30.320]  Okay, we were talking about how to go after the federal courts.
[01:04:30.320 --> 01:04:32.320]  And it may be a good idea.
[01:04:32.320 --> 01:04:38.320]  Everybody who filed a suit, Harmon Taylor, took this issue on and fought it and lost it.
[01:04:38.320 --> 01:04:41.320]  The courts just don't care.
[01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:46.320]  They really don't care what the law is. So how do we make them care?
[01:04:46.320 --> 01:04:51.320]  We beat up somebody else because of them.
[01:04:51.320 --> 01:04:56.320]  And then get them griping to the federal judges for causing other people problems.
[01:04:56.320 --> 01:05:06.320]  And what is a U.S. attorney going to do when we start filing criminal charges against a U.S. attorney,
[01:05:06.320 --> 01:05:14.320]  accusing him of shielding the special agent in charge of the FBI from prosecution.
[01:05:14.320 --> 01:05:23.320]  I'm sorry, shielding himself from prosecution by secreting criminal complaints against himself from the grand jury.
[01:05:23.320 --> 01:05:24.320]  Oh, that'll...
[01:05:24.320 --> 01:05:26.320]  Were we accused him?
[01:05:26.320 --> 01:05:27.320]  Oh, yeah.
[01:05:27.320 --> 01:05:36.320]  Were we accused him of secreting criminal complaints against the special agent in charge?
[01:05:36.320 --> 01:05:40.320]  And it says nothing to the federal courts over there.
[01:05:40.320 --> 01:05:43.320]  But they started all this mess.
[01:05:43.320 --> 01:05:50.320]  And you accuse the U.S. of the special agent in charge of shielding the federal judge from prosecution.
[01:05:50.320 --> 01:05:54.320]  If you're on a jury and you hear all this,
[01:05:54.320 --> 01:06:01.320]  are you going to say, oh, it's okay for all these guys to do all this stuff?
[01:06:01.320 --> 01:06:02.320]  Maybe.
[01:06:02.320 --> 01:06:06.320]  But if you're a federal judge,
[01:06:06.320 --> 01:06:11.320]  and what you know about grand juries, you know what Scalia said about it,
[01:06:11.320 --> 01:06:18.320]  that any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich and diet it.
[01:06:18.320 --> 01:06:23.320]  So I do something annoying over here to approach a litigant.
[01:06:23.320 --> 01:06:33.320]  And now he's over there beating up the U.S. attorney for not giving complaints against me to the grand jury.
[01:06:33.320 --> 01:06:37.320]  What if they really get him P.O.'s?
[01:06:37.320 --> 01:06:41.320]  And what if he does give the complaints to the grand jury?
[01:06:41.320 --> 01:06:42.320]  Exactly.
[01:06:42.320 --> 01:06:50.320]  I once filed criminal charges against all the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:06:50.320 --> 01:06:54.320]  And they didn't get indicted.
[01:06:54.320 --> 01:07:02.320]  But they spent three months from the first day the grand jury set in office till the last day,
[01:07:02.320 --> 01:07:05.320]  wondering if their career was going to end tomorrow.
[01:07:05.320 --> 01:07:10.320]  And there was nothing they could do.
[01:07:10.320 --> 01:07:14.320]  But I hope the grand jury didn't indict them.
[01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:16.320]  Well, they didn't.
[01:07:16.320 --> 01:07:20.320]  But I'm getting ready to try that again.
[01:07:20.320 --> 01:07:22.320]  I may do it with the governor.
[01:07:22.320 --> 01:07:28.320]  I'm in the process of preparing a suit against the governor over the mask issues,
[01:07:28.320 --> 01:07:33.320]  because I had a sheriff's deputy threaten to shoot me if I didn't put a mask,
[01:07:33.320 --> 01:07:37.320]  if I tried to go into the courthouse without a mask.
[01:07:37.320 --> 01:07:40.320]  He was a little smart mouth guy.
[01:07:40.320 --> 01:07:45.320]  So now I'm going to sue the governor because he had a smart mouth.
[01:07:45.320 --> 01:07:47.320]  That's kind of what it's like.
[01:07:47.320 --> 01:07:49.320]  You set him up.
[01:07:49.320 --> 01:07:53.320]  The federal judge is just as susceptible to this as anybody else.
[01:07:53.320 --> 01:07:57.320]  I filed criminal charges against federal judge McBride.
[01:07:57.320 --> 01:08:01.320]  He was in his upper 90s and he was a real stinker.
[01:08:01.320 --> 01:08:05.320]  And he dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to state a claim
[01:08:05.320 --> 01:08:09.320]  when it was a petition for declaratory judgment.
[01:08:09.320 --> 01:08:12.320]  So I went straight to the U.S. Attorney and filed criminal charges against him.
[01:08:12.320 --> 01:08:18.320]  But my client, it was a foreclosure issue and the client just bailed out,
[01:08:18.320 --> 01:08:20.320]  so I didn't pursue it.
[01:08:20.320 --> 01:08:29.320]  But when I do it myself, I want to do it over something exactly like Brett is.
[01:08:29.320 --> 01:08:33.320]  A traffic ticket.
[01:08:33.320 --> 01:08:41.320]  This guy's trying to get me arrested over a traffic ticket.
[01:08:41.320 --> 01:08:43.320]  Which the JP already told me.
[01:08:43.320 --> 01:08:45.320]  I said, well, what if I can't pay?
[01:08:45.320 --> 01:08:49.320]  And he says, well, I can't make you.
[01:08:49.320 --> 01:08:56.320]  And it's still, the traffic ticket itself is still awaiting the appeal at the county court.
[01:08:56.320 --> 01:09:01.320]  But meanwhile, I'm in the Fed dragging the lawyers in there.
[01:09:01.320 --> 01:09:12.320]  I mean, the last year I checked numbers, there were nine million criminal cases brought in Texas in one year.
[01:09:12.320 --> 01:09:18.320]  Seven million were traffic.
[01:09:18.320 --> 01:09:25.320]  These guys got to look at this and say, holy mackerel, what if this thing catches on?
[01:09:25.320 --> 01:09:28.320]  They can shut us down.
[01:09:28.320 --> 01:09:31.320]  Over nothing.
[01:09:31.320 --> 01:09:35.320]  And that's, I have found that, and this is what I want to tell people.
[01:09:35.320 --> 01:09:38.320]  Don't wait until they do something really horrible.
[01:09:38.320 --> 01:09:42.320]  Go beat him up over something minor.
[01:09:42.320 --> 01:09:46.320]  So the judge comes in, he gets his case, he sends it to the magistrate,
[01:09:46.320 --> 01:09:51.320]  and now he's got this guy trying to get him arrested,
[01:09:51.320 --> 01:09:55.320]  beating up the US attorney, beating up the special agent in charge,
[01:09:55.320 --> 01:09:59.320]  filing criminal charges with attorney general in DC.
[01:09:59.320 --> 01:10:05.320]  But not because of the traffic ticket, only because they're handling everything in a lawless way all along.
[01:10:05.320 --> 01:10:07.320]  Yeah.
[01:10:07.320 --> 01:10:10.320]  This is a nothing case.
[01:10:10.320 --> 01:10:13.320]  And I've got to put up with all this nonsense.
[01:10:13.320 --> 01:10:16.320]  This is how we fix them.
[01:10:16.320 --> 01:10:22.320]  If I can have this done to me only something this unimportant.
[01:10:22.320 --> 01:10:25.320]  How about something more serious?
[01:10:25.320 --> 01:10:35.320]  I want them to sit there and think that every single case that's filed in the court is a potential landmine.
[01:10:35.320 --> 01:10:40.320]  You never know which one's going to blow up in your face.
[01:10:40.320 --> 01:10:47.320]  And this takes me back to the day I walked into my district attorney's office and he's sitting with his head in his hand.
[01:10:47.320 --> 01:10:55.320]  And I said, what's the matter, Greg? And he looked up at me with this full on look on his face and said,
[01:10:55.320 --> 01:11:02.320]  those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[01:11:02.320 --> 01:11:10.320]  And I held both her hands up over my head, looked up at the ceiling and said, there is a God.
[01:11:10.320 --> 01:11:16.320]  I could not have heard anything better.
[01:11:16.320 --> 01:11:23.320]  Scalia said any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich indicted.
[01:11:23.320 --> 01:11:25.320]  And I agree with that.
[01:11:25.320 --> 01:11:32.320]  The problem is keeping the ham sandwich from getting indicted.
[01:11:32.320 --> 01:11:36.320]  That's a whole other animal.
[01:11:36.320 --> 01:11:41.320]  That's the one the position therein.
[01:11:41.320 --> 01:11:47.320]  How do you know when you bring when these complaints are brought before a grand jury,
[01:11:47.320 --> 01:11:57.320]  that there's not someone on the grand jury who's had a grandson ran through the system railroaded this way?
[01:11:57.320 --> 01:12:00.320]  You have no idea.
[01:12:00.320 --> 01:12:06.320]  And that reminds you that when you play fast and loose with rule of law,
[01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:13.320]  you're playing Russian roulette with your career. If we get our public officials in that position,
[01:12:13.320 --> 01:12:16.320]  we will have liberty.
[01:12:16.320 --> 01:12:24.320]  According to Thomas Jefferson, when the people fear the government, there is turning.
[01:12:24.320 --> 01:12:30.320]  When the government fears the people, there is liberty and we need to instill some fear in them.
[01:12:30.320 --> 01:12:37.320]  Okay, enough of this. We got a couple of colleagues on the line. We're going to go to Scott in New York.
[01:12:37.320 --> 01:12:41.320]  Scott, what do you have for us today?
[01:12:41.320 --> 01:12:45.320]  Hello there. I called in last week. It's the same thing I had last week.
[01:12:45.320 --> 01:12:51.320]  I found out this afternoon, just like last week, the day before that the city is coming in tomorrow.
[01:12:51.320 --> 01:12:53.320]  Although there seems to be some gray area.
[01:12:53.320 --> 01:13:00.320]  Okay, hold on. We don't remember last week. We're old. We sleep.
[01:13:00.320 --> 01:13:03.320]  Bring us up to speed. Give us this short course.
[01:13:03.320 --> 01:13:06.320]  I need some sleep now that you mentioned it.
[01:13:06.320 --> 01:13:12.320]  Last week, I was trying to write a cease and desist letter,
[01:13:12.320 --> 01:13:18.320]  and I read something that started with something about a creature of God, which should have been a creation of God.
[01:13:18.320 --> 01:13:30.320]  The deal is, I live in a house of a tenant with an old lady that I haven't been able to speak with for years,
[01:13:30.320 --> 01:13:36.320]  and I discovered why in July, I had to wake her up when I locked myself out three in the morning,
[01:13:36.320 --> 01:13:40.320]  and I discovered she had a massive bed-book infestation for at least eight years,
[01:13:40.320 --> 01:13:45.320]  but I thought I got rid of it many times. It's been a while, but she's been secreting it.
[01:13:45.320 --> 01:13:52.320]  Adult protective services came on board 5-5 day before her birthday,
[01:13:52.320 --> 01:13:57.320]  and knocking at the door with a locksmith and all stuff.
[01:13:57.320 --> 01:14:02.320]  When I read their document, they've been secreting the lawyer.
[01:14:02.320 --> 01:14:05.320]  First, she was assigned an attorney, then she accepted this other dude.
[01:14:05.320 --> 01:14:10.320]  It's the same dude that was supposedly helping her five years ago when they were there,
[01:14:10.320 --> 01:14:14.320]  and he wouldn't give us the files. He was secreting the files then, the case files.
[01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:20.320]  This time, the attack was so intense, and it really stems from a hate crime from the neighbors
[01:14:20.320 --> 01:14:24.320]  from before I even got here. When I got here, the place was a wreck.
[01:14:24.320 --> 01:14:29.320]  The driver was filled with wreck, everything, a car, and I cleaned up the driveway,
[01:14:29.320 --> 01:14:36.320]  found the foundation that was all cracked, and I noticed that the neighbors didn't appreciate it all,
[01:14:36.320 --> 01:14:41.320]  and it just carried the hate crime over to me, and there's nothing to do with the woman
[01:14:41.320 --> 01:14:44.320]  and whatever reason they had to hate her.
[01:14:44.320 --> 01:14:49.320]  So I wound up putting the stuff back in the driveway to try and get them in court.
[01:14:49.320 --> 01:14:55.320]  The truth of the matter is that the neighbors nest their haters.
[01:14:55.320 --> 01:15:00.320]  They've been threatening, slandering me, the tenants, the lady, nonstop.
[01:15:00.320 --> 01:15:05.320]  It happened before I got here, and then it continued to me, even though I cleaned up the driveway,
[01:15:05.320 --> 01:15:10.320]  and it turns out the nephew that's the lead hater of the pack works for the city.
[01:15:10.320 --> 01:15:17.320]  So here's the catch. We share the common causeway, the driveway, and the garage structure behind it,
[01:15:17.320 --> 01:15:23.320]  and I repaired ours. It had just wood for the roof that leaked, some half inch plywood,
[01:15:23.320 --> 01:15:28.320]  no window, the doors, and I see six, and I did the whole roof just about.
[01:15:28.320 --> 01:15:32.320]  It took me a lot of years, of course, at a time. I'm like one course from the top ridge,
[01:15:32.320 --> 01:15:37.320]  and the neighbor's roof back then had just big holes in it and was sagging,
[01:15:37.320 --> 01:15:42.320]  and it lets the moisture into the inside of their structure, rotting the members,
[01:15:42.320 --> 01:15:46.320]  causing the termite damage that I had to remove, causing mine.
[01:15:46.320 --> 01:15:47.320]  So really...
[01:15:47.320 --> 01:15:48.320]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:15:48.320 --> 01:15:50.320]  One more sentence, and I'll be done.
[01:15:50.320 --> 01:15:54.320]  You can spend the whole show telling us all this stuff.
[01:15:54.320 --> 01:15:58.320]  What is the issue you have?
[01:15:58.320 --> 01:16:01.320]  Bring us to something focused.
[01:16:01.320 --> 01:16:04.320]  So you forget the emails, I assume?
[01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:09.320]  Okay, I know who you are now. You've got some annoying neighbors.
[01:16:09.320 --> 01:16:14.320]  The annoying neighbors are peo-ed at you, and they're sending the city after you.
[01:16:14.320 --> 01:16:18.320]  Well, I just wanted to explain the full picture. This has been going on for years.
[01:16:18.320 --> 01:16:24.320]  Okay, so what's the issue right now? What are they doing right now?
[01:16:24.320 --> 01:16:30.320]  Our garage structure is almost unusable, and it may be condemned if there's collapses,
[01:16:30.320 --> 01:16:35.320]  and they have never gotten the summons of force to fix their structure.
[01:16:35.320 --> 01:16:38.320]  Okay, hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:38.320 --> 01:16:45.320]  So you're saying that you're being damaged by their failure to maintain their structure.
[01:16:45.320 --> 01:16:55.320]  Interesting. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:55.320 --> 01:17:00.320]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:25.320 --> 01:17:29.320]  In January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse
[01:17:29.320 --> 01:17:34.320]  and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour topical studies will vary each week
[01:17:34.320 --> 01:17:38.320]  with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.320 --> 01:17:43.320]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.320 --> 01:17:50.320]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Saviour Jesus.
[01:17:50.320 --> 01:17:55.320]  So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[01:17:55.320 --> 01:18:00.320]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.320 --> 01:18:06.320]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.320 --> 01:18:11.320]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.320 --> 01:18:17.320]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.320 --> 01:18:22.320]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated,
[01:18:22.320 --> 01:18:25.320]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.320 --> 01:18:31.320]  LogosRadioNetwork gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.320 --> 01:18:34.320]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:18:34.320 --> 01:18:40.320]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others.
[01:18:40.320 --> 01:18:44.320]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve
[01:18:44.320 --> 01:18:47.320]  as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.320 --> 01:18:51.320]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.320 --> 01:18:56.320]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:18:56.320 --> 01:19:14.320]  and increase your income. Order now.
[01:19:26.320 --> 01:19:36.320]  Well, it ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.320 --> 01:19:41.320]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:41.320 --> 01:19:46.320]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:46.320 --> 01:19:55.320]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:55.320 --> 01:20:11.320]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:11.320 --> 01:20:16.320]  Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch.
[01:20:16.320 --> 01:20:21.320]  I get it now, but then I must have been out too much.
[01:20:21.320 --> 01:20:27.320]  Back then you had room to move.
[01:20:27.320 --> 01:20:30.320]  And we have Scott in New York.
[01:20:30.320 --> 01:20:32.320]  Scott in New York, you're taking care of this.
[01:20:32.320 --> 01:20:34.320]  You're living in this building.
[01:20:34.320 --> 01:20:37.320]  You're taking care of this older lady,
[01:20:37.320 --> 01:20:43.320]  and she has had bed bug infections over and over,
[01:20:43.320 --> 01:20:47.320]  and the city came out for a wellness check
[01:20:47.320 --> 01:20:51.320]  and found all these bed bugs.
[01:20:51.320 --> 01:20:57.320]  Am I correct on that? Hold on, let me unmute you.
[01:20:57.320 --> 01:21:03.320]  And the next door neighbor didn't fix...
[01:21:03.320 --> 01:21:09.320]  I guess you have a garage or something that's joined.
[01:21:09.320 --> 01:21:15.320]  And the next door neighbor hasn't fixed the roof and it's damaged in your side.
[01:21:15.320 --> 01:21:18.320]  You had a bunch of stuff in the driveway and you took it out
[01:21:18.320 --> 01:21:22.320]  and they were so crappy to you, you put it all back in the driveway.
[01:21:22.320 --> 01:21:25.320]  In order to get them and the city workers that are saying that's a violation,
[01:21:25.320 --> 01:21:27.320]  but you have it incorrect.
[01:21:27.320 --> 01:21:31.320]  No, I've gotten rid of bed bugs several times, including help with the tenants.
[01:21:31.320 --> 01:21:34.320]  The owner has never had a break from them.
[01:21:34.320 --> 01:21:36.320]  She's just kept them secret.
[01:21:36.320 --> 01:21:39.320]  And I'm claiming that...
[01:21:39.320 --> 01:21:41.320]  So I'll bring it up to date now.
[01:21:41.320 --> 01:21:44.320]  The last week they all showed up at 9 in the morning
[01:21:44.320 --> 01:21:49.320]  and I read this document that shows that adult protective services
[01:21:49.320 --> 01:21:52.320]  does not have the authority to provide her services to her
[01:21:52.320 --> 01:21:57.320]  because she doesn't meet any of the three criteria that are necessary in order to be eligible.
[01:21:57.320 --> 01:22:02.320]  You must meet all the following criteria to be eligible for protective services.
[01:22:02.320 --> 01:22:06.320]  C, have no one available who is willing and able to assist you responsible.
[01:22:06.320 --> 01:22:12.320]  All of these people, including her attorney and all the agents, know that I'm here.
[01:22:12.320 --> 01:22:15.320]  So they should never have been here in the first place.
[01:22:15.320 --> 01:22:19.320]  And they're the ones that hired the construction crew that's coming.
[01:22:19.320 --> 01:22:22.320]  Wait a minute. Who are you relative to this woman?
[01:22:22.320 --> 01:22:26.320]  Are you a relative to her or just a tenant?
[01:22:26.320 --> 01:22:31.320]  I'm only a tenant and I'm a witness and I...
[01:22:31.320 --> 01:22:34.320]  Do you have any kind of power of attorney for this woman?
[01:22:34.320 --> 01:22:36.320]  No, not yet. No.
[01:22:36.320 --> 01:22:43.320]  She, by letting this guy represent her, that's why I realized that he's the criminal.
[01:22:43.320 --> 01:22:46.320]  He's harming her and me and the animals.
[01:22:46.320 --> 01:22:49.320]  And I have the evidence of that in the emails.
[01:22:49.320 --> 01:22:51.320]  And still, as of last week, now...
[01:22:51.320 --> 01:22:56.320]  Okay, hold on, hold on. How do you have standing, legal standing to raise an issue?
[01:22:56.320 --> 01:22:59.320]  I don't. I don't.
[01:22:59.320 --> 01:23:00.320]  Oh.
[01:23:00.320 --> 01:23:03.320]  That's what I'm going to get with all the stuff in the driveway.
[01:23:03.320 --> 01:23:06.320]  And instead, they've just escalated and they've been seeking...
[01:23:06.320 --> 01:23:07.320]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:07.320 --> 01:23:10.320]  That's why you put all the stuff in the driveway?
[01:23:10.320 --> 01:23:14.320]  Pretty much, yeah. Although, I had some of it as some legitimate work.
[01:23:14.320 --> 01:23:17.320]  Wait a minute. Did you do that to be annoying?
[01:23:17.320 --> 01:23:21.320]  No, I did that in order to get this to not be a civil matter,
[01:23:21.320 --> 01:23:26.320]  so that I can get the neighbors and the city that's saying that we have a violation,
[01:23:26.320 --> 01:23:32.320]  but yet the same city agencies won't give them a violation, which is actually a real danger.
[01:23:32.320 --> 01:23:37.320]  So, I have, like, from another piece of...
[01:23:37.320 --> 01:23:43.320]  Unless the petition is repair, crew and contractor is allowed to access the subject premises
[01:23:43.320 --> 01:23:46.320]  to affect the aforementioned emergency repairs,
[01:23:46.320 --> 01:23:51.320]  the health, welfare and safety of the tenants residing in said premises shall be placed in a meet.
[01:23:51.320 --> 01:23:56.320]  There is no tenants that set me. They all left because the conditions were bad,
[01:23:56.320 --> 01:23:58.320]  some of them because of the bed bugs.
[01:23:58.320 --> 01:24:07.320]  Well, it sounds like the city has a legitimate concern that the building is a health hazard.
[01:24:07.320 --> 01:24:11.320]  Well, don't they have to give me due process? They're harming me.
[01:24:11.320 --> 01:24:12.320]  No.
[01:24:12.320 --> 01:24:13.320]  They'll harm me more.
[01:24:13.320 --> 01:24:15.320]  No, no, no. You're just a tenant.
[01:24:15.320 --> 01:24:19.320]  You're not the owner. They would have to be dealing with the owner.
[01:24:19.320 --> 01:24:26.320]  And then, in the same breath, the worker, the case, was saying that they told her.
[01:24:26.320 --> 01:24:29.320]  But the reason they're here is they know that she's incompetent.
[01:24:29.320 --> 01:24:31.320]  I'm saying it's because of the bed bugs.
[01:24:31.320 --> 01:24:35.320]  They're saying it's because it's that she needs adult protective services because she...
[01:24:35.320 --> 01:24:37.320]  Wait, wait, wait. How old is this woman?
[01:24:37.320 --> 01:24:42.320]  She's old. 400? I don't know.
[01:24:42.320 --> 01:24:46.320]  I actually don't know. I think she's the same age as my mom.
[01:24:46.320 --> 01:24:50.320]  She's up there. And now she's used to working for a few years.
[01:24:50.320 --> 01:24:55.320]  So, does she have anyone, does she have family or anyone who takes care of her?
[01:24:55.320 --> 01:25:00.320]  Only me. The sister is trying to get the guardianship, but she truly can't do it.
[01:25:00.320 --> 01:25:01.320]  She's not here.
[01:25:01.320 --> 01:25:09.320]  So, what I'm trying to do now is just to write up a cease and desist notice to go out and make copies and provide it.
[01:25:09.320 --> 01:25:12.320]  You can't. You don't have any static.
[01:25:12.320 --> 01:25:16.320]  They would just look at your note and say, who the heck is this?
[01:25:16.320 --> 01:25:20.320]  Now they're coming at me. They're going to harm me. And I'm witness of the hate crime.
[01:25:20.320 --> 01:25:23.320]  So, when I tried to report that to the police last week...
[01:25:23.320 --> 01:25:28.320]  How did you get to hate crime? What are the elements of hate crime?
[01:25:28.320 --> 01:25:34.320]  The racist neighbors slandering...
[01:25:34.320 --> 01:25:39.320]  No, no, no, no, no, no. This is not... I'm not asking you what they did.
[01:25:39.320 --> 01:25:48.320]  In order to claim a hate crime, hate crime is going to have a set of elements that define a hate crime.
[01:25:48.320 --> 01:25:51.320]  I don't know any of that, but let me finish about the police thing.
[01:25:51.320 --> 01:25:56.320]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You can't say I'm going to file a hate crime and you...
[01:25:56.320 --> 01:26:01.320]  On this next breath, so you don't even know what one is.
[01:26:01.320 --> 01:26:06.320]  I know that I'm being hated on from these neighbors, despite even the fact that...
[01:26:06.320 --> 01:26:08.320]  That's a whole different issue.
[01:26:08.320 --> 01:26:16.320]  A hate crime is a statute. It is a criminal act, and every criminal act has a set of elements.
[01:26:16.320 --> 01:26:22.320]  Before you can make the claim, you have to know what the elements are.
[01:26:22.320 --> 01:26:28.320]  Brett, while we're talking, will you pull up hate crime and see if you can find us a set of elements?
[01:26:28.320 --> 01:26:30.320]  Well, if you let me...
[01:26:30.320 --> 01:26:33.320]  No, no, wait, wait. You're just complaining.
[01:26:33.320 --> 01:26:37.320]  And complaining. You're just going on one thing after another after another.
[01:26:37.320 --> 01:26:42.320]  If we're going to help you, we have to give you some tools to work with.
[01:26:42.320 --> 01:26:47.320]  If you believe there's a hate crime, now let's figure out what a hate crime is.
[01:26:47.320 --> 01:26:52.320]  And then look at... You probably got all the elements that you need.
[01:26:52.320 --> 01:26:54.320]  I'm sure I do.
[01:26:54.320 --> 01:27:03.320]  But you need to know what they are, and then we can walk down the facts and find the ones that fit your hate crime.
[01:27:03.320 --> 01:27:09.320]  Then you can prepare a affidavit that addresses all the elements.
[01:27:09.320 --> 01:27:12.320]  Because when you bring an issue...
[01:27:12.320 --> 01:27:17.320]  Tomorrow, what I'm called now is to try and get help writing a cease and desist letter that I've been writing all during your show.
[01:27:17.320 --> 01:27:22.320]  I actually thought it was a repeat in the beginning, and then it got really loud, and it seemed to be loud.
[01:27:22.320 --> 01:27:27.320]  But if you let me finish about what happened with the police last week, you'll see what happened.
[01:27:27.320 --> 01:27:31.320]  All you're doing is complaining about all the bad things that happened.
[01:27:31.320 --> 01:27:40.320]  You're trying to give him exculpatory evidence, and instead, he only listens...
[01:27:40.320 --> 01:27:44.320]  Who exculpatory evidence for what?
[01:27:44.320 --> 01:27:49.320]  That the lawyer is harming, not helping.
[01:27:49.320 --> 01:27:54.320]  Now, as of last week, he's harming me, and he's doing it from many, many different ways and means.
[01:27:54.320 --> 01:27:57.320]  And the evidence is in the emails that I mailed you.
[01:27:57.320 --> 01:28:03.320]  The emails to the case worker that was proven to be a liar, and that he had her testify.
[01:28:03.320 --> 01:28:05.320]  And I don't know anything that's going on in court.
[01:28:05.320 --> 01:28:08.320]  I've been remained out of court so I could be a witness.
[01:28:08.320 --> 01:28:13.320]  I've been remaining here, and I've been working with the attorney, and everything I gave him to help her,
[01:28:13.320 --> 01:28:18.320]  he secreted and did other things behind his back and lying, and won't give us...
[01:28:18.320 --> 01:28:22.320]  Have you filed bar grievances against the attorney?
[01:28:22.320 --> 01:28:29.320]  Well, Tina sent me some bar grievances yesterday, but I realized that that's...
[01:28:29.320 --> 01:28:34.320]  Now, I need to really do a statement of facts, a sworn statement of facts, rebutting what I'll do,
[01:28:34.320 --> 01:28:36.320]  but I haven't had a chance to do that.
[01:28:36.320 --> 01:28:43.320]  I thought I got some break last week, and then yesterday, today, I found out at 3 in the afternoon
[01:28:43.320 --> 01:28:45.320]  that they're coming again tomorrow in the morning.
[01:28:45.320 --> 01:28:51.320]  And the trick is, the case workers, that he or the lady is...
[01:28:51.320 --> 01:28:53.320]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:28:53.320 --> 01:29:00.320]  You're using up our show, hashing over all the bad things, and we're not getting anywhere.
[01:29:00.320 --> 01:29:05.320]  Have you written up a statement of facts on these issues?
[01:29:05.320 --> 01:29:08.320]  I won't have time to do that by tomorrow. It's ten years worth of facts.
[01:29:08.320 --> 01:29:14.320]  No, no, no, no, no. You can't do anything without a statement of facts.
[01:29:14.320 --> 01:29:22.320]  What we generally... No, no, I'm going to let you run on and on and complain about it.
[01:29:22.320 --> 01:29:30.320]  This does no good. If you don't have some focus or direction, you're just complaining.
[01:29:30.320 --> 01:29:39.320]  If you're going to get anything done, I need to get me a statement of facts or a timeline, timeline of events.
[01:29:39.320 --> 01:29:41.320]  You don't have to have all the facts.
[01:29:41.320 --> 01:29:49.320]  This happened, the order of things happened. You're jumping all over the place, and we're not getting anywhere.
[01:29:49.320 --> 01:29:55.320]  Give me some kind of statement, and then email that to me, and then call in next week.
[01:29:55.320 --> 01:30:00.320]  Randy Kelton, Brent Fountain, Louisville Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.320 --> 01:30:09.320]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:09.320 --> 01:30:12.320]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:12.320 --> 01:30:41.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:42.320 --> 01:30:45.320]  Start over with Start Page.
[01:31:12.320 --> 01:31:37.320]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.320 --> 01:31:43.320]  It says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.320 --> 01:31:46.320]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.320 --> 01:31:49.320]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.320 --> 01:31:50.320]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.320 --> 01:31:51.320]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.320 --> 01:31:52.320]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.320 --> 01:31:53.320]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.320 --> 01:31:55.320]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.320 --> 01:31:58.320]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.320 --> 01:32:01.320]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.320 --> 01:32:08.320]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America, we live in an us against them society.
[01:32:08.320 --> 01:32:13.320]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.320 --> 01:32:18.320]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.320 --> 01:32:20.320]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.320 --> 01:32:26.320]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.320 --> 01:32:31.320]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.320 --> 01:32:35.320]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law.
[01:32:35.320 --> 01:32:41.320]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.320 --> 01:32:45.320]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:45.320 --> 01:32:48.320]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.320 --> 01:32:51.320]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.320 --> 01:32:55.320]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.320 --> 01:33:00.320]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:25.320 --> 01:33:50.320]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Tina in California.
[01:33:50.320 --> 01:33:55.320]  Hello, Ms. Tina. What do you have for us today?
[01:33:55.320 --> 01:34:05.320]  Well, I have two questions. One is about the case that we are getting the judgment on tomorrow.
[01:34:05.320 --> 01:34:09.320]  We tried to work with the defendants to do...
[01:34:09.320 --> 01:34:12.320]  Wait a minute, Ms. Tina, are you on that Bluetooth?
[01:34:12.320 --> 01:34:16.320]  No, I'm not. I took it off before I even got on the phone.
[01:34:16.320 --> 01:34:20.320]  I'm still kind of muffled. Maybe it's my headset.
[01:34:20.320 --> 01:34:24.320]  Sounds fine to me.
[01:34:24.320 --> 01:34:31.320]  So we tried to work with them. They refused to give us their place of work and proof of their income.
[01:34:31.320 --> 01:34:35.320]  They say they'll only give it to a third party.
[01:34:35.320 --> 01:34:41.320]  And it's going to take them two years to make payments to any stipulated judgment.
[01:34:41.320 --> 01:34:49.320]  They'll get their discharge if we agree to a stipulated judgment, which means that we don't really have any protection if they say,
[01:34:49.320 --> 01:34:53.320]  well, we'll pay three payments, four payments, we're going to quit.
[01:34:53.320 --> 01:34:56.320]  And then we write back where we started.
[01:34:56.320 --> 01:35:05.320]  So I was thinking of writing a declaration letter to the judge and I'm not sure if this is okay.
[01:35:05.320 --> 01:35:13.320]  He gave us till 5 p.m. tomorrow or for them to write this stipulation, not us.
[01:35:13.320 --> 01:35:18.320]  And when we gave them some very straightforward facts, how can we trust you?
[01:35:18.320 --> 01:35:23.320]  You've told us you'll send money before. It never happened.
[01:35:23.320 --> 01:35:27.320]  And a few things with very polite email.
[01:35:27.320 --> 01:35:33.320]  And they said, well, it's into your benefit to settle with us out of court, really?
[01:35:33.320 --> 01:35:37.320]  I didn't think it was our benefit. It's not out of court. It's in court.
[01:35:37.320 --> 01:35:42.320]  But anyway, and she said, well, if you weren't settled, then we're going to file an appeal.
[01:35:42.320 --> 01:35:47.320]  We'll go right ahead because the judge didn't do anything wrong and you don't understand what an appeal is.
[01:35:47.320 --> 01:35:52.320]  But that's okay. They have every right to file an appeal and we can respond.
[01:35:52.320 --> 01:35:59.320]  Is it okay, do you think, to write to the judge and say, per your suggestion at this hearing,
[01:35:59.320 --> 01:36:08.320]  we attempted to do a stipulated judgment with the defendants but negotiations broke down because of ABC
[01:36:08.320 --> 01:36:14.320]  and we feel we're more protected with a judgment where they don't get their discharge
[01:36:14.320 --> 01:36:22.320]  and then reiterate the three things that we asked for or do you think that's like over the top?
[01:36:22.320 --> 01:36:29.320]  I was trying to go and keep it quite polite and just simple and to the point that we took of his suggestions,
[01:36:29.320 --> 01:36:37.320]  the talks broke down, we'd like him to rule based on what we put in the stipulated, you know,
[01:36:37.320 --> 01:36:41.320]  stipulation, pre-trust stipulation.
[01:36:41.320 --> 01:36:44.320]  What are your thoughts?
[01:36:44.320 --> 01:36:48.320]  Brett, can you respond to that? I'm having trouble understanding.
[01:36:48.320 --> 01:37:00.320]  Well, she's asking what, yeah, well, my thoughts are what would be the appropriate way to get this message to the judge
[01:37:00.320 --> 01:37:08.320]  in a way that's not going to be ex parte, you know, here's just one message from one party to the judge,
[01:37:08.320 --> 01:37:14.320]  but something that is a regular document that you give the other side a copy of
[01:37:14.320 --> 01:37:20.320]  and what occurs to me is a notice.
[01:37:20.320 --> 01:37:28.320]  If you give a notice to the court that says we had such and such honor about this date,
[01:37:28.320 --> 01:37:31.320]  we did what you said, judge.
[01:37:31.320 --> 01:37:41.320]  We had these attempts, attempted some mediation, some resolution via these other methods
[01:37:41.320 --> 01:37:51.320]  and talks broke down in that the owing party was unwilling to provide any sort of guarantee
[01:37:51.320 --> 01:38:00.320]  that they would keep their word this time or do anything differently than they did last time.
[01:38:00.320 --> 01:38:03.320]  You know, something that says, here's what happened.
[01:38:03.320 --> 01:38:09.320]  And you're putting it out there as a notice, that way you can just give the other side a copy.
[01:38:09.320 --> 01:38:11.320]  I think Randy, will that work?
[01:38:11.320 --> 01:38:14.320]  It's not a motion.
[01:38:14.320 --> 01:38:19.320]  The judge knows what's going on.
[01:38:19.320 --> 01:38:25.320]  And you just need to demonstrate to him that you exercised due diligence.
[01:38:25.320 --> 01:38:31.320]  You tried to get along with the person and they were not forthcoming.
[01:38:31.320 --> 01:38:37.320]  And you could not come to an agreement and ask the judge to just stipulate an agreement, a ruling.
[01:38:37.320 --> 01:38:39.320]  Okay.
[01:38:39.320 --> 01:38:41.320]  We made a good faith effort.
[01:38:41.320 --> 01:38:43.320]  Yes, that's what I wanted to put.
[01:38:43.320 --> 01:38:45.320]  We made a good faith effort.
[01:38:45.320 --> 01:38:47.320]  They refused to give us the information.
[01:38:47.320 --> 01:38:54.320]  Now, if we go and get the judgment, we can go get a debt examination and we'll get the information anyway.
[01:38:54.320 --> 01:39:00.320]  But, you know, we're not knowing what the judge is going to order for us and give us.
[01:39:00.320 --> 01:39:03.320]  It makes it a little difficult.
[01:39:03.320 --> 01:39:13.320]  But, you know, I guess I'll put a notice and I'll send them an email, the other side an email notice in the afternoon and they can respond or whatever.
[01:39:13.320 --> 01:39:16.320]  And let's see what, let's see what happens.
[01:39:16.320 --> 01:39:18.320]  So thank you for your input there.
[01:39:18.320 --> 01:39:21.320]  Hey, I had an idea, Tina, just a moment before you go.
[01:39:21.320 --> 01:39:22.320]  I had an idea.
[01:39:22.320 --> 01:39:24.320]  Maybe you could roll a motion into this.
[01:39:24.320 --> 01:39:37.320]  And it could be a motion that when the judge does issue his order as he was contemplating doing in the pre-trial stipulations,
[01:39:37.320 --> 01:39:45.320]  when he does issue his order, that he would also accompany his order with a writ of execution.
[01:39:45.320 --> 01:39:47.320]  That way it's a motion.
[01:39:47.320 --> 01:39:49.320]  And you're also asking for teeth.
[01:39:49.320 --> 01:39:55.320]  You're saying as soon as you give your signature on that dotted line, I can go sell his car.
[01:39:55.320 --> 01:39:58.320]  Okay.
[01:39:58.320 --> 01:40:00.320]  Well, I can ask for that.
[01:40:00.320 --> 01:40:05.320]  I mean, in bankruptcy, they have 14 days to appeal anything.
[01:40:05.320 --> 01:40:13.320]  And apparently we would be okay going for 24 months if they didn't get the discharge.
[01:40:13.320 --> 01:40:18.320]  But everything I've read and talked to a couple of attorneys who really weren't sure of the answer.
[01:40:18.320 --> 01:40:24.320]  But they gave me their best guess is that courts, when there's a final, they just want it over.
[01:40:24.320 --> 01:40:25.320]  They want to be done.
[01:40:25.320 --> 01:40:29.320]  They don't want to hold a discharge over the next 24 months.
[01:40:29.320 --> 01:40:31.320]  They just want the case to be.
[01:40:31.320 --> 01:40:32.320]  Yes.
[01:40:32.320 --> 01:40:33.320]  Don't say that.
[01:40:33.320 --> 01:40:35.320]  Don't even bring up the 24 months.
[01:40:35.320 --> 01:40:38.320]  Just say you want this over too.
[01:40:38.320 --> 01:40:41.320]  Just say here's your notice.
[01:40:41.320 --> 01:40:44.320]  Notice and motion for writ of execution.
[01:40:44.320 --> 01:40:49.320]  And could be like one page long, you could be done.
[01:40:49.320 --> 01:40:50.320]  Okay.
[01:40:50.320 --> 01:40:51.320]  That sounds good.
[01:40:51.320 --> 01:40:52.320]  I mean, I can do my best.
[01:40:52.320 --> 01:40:57.320]  What are you going to do if we do it right and we do it politely and professionally?
[01:40:57.320 --> 01:41:00.320]  You know, he can say yay or nay.
[01:41:00.320 --> 01:41:01.320]  Exactly.
[01:41:01.320 --> 01:41:02.320]  Thank you for that.
[01:41:02.320 --> 01:41:05.320]  And when you keep it short and sweet like that, what can the other side do?
[01:41:05.320 --> 01:41:12.320]  There's nothing that the opposing party could challenge about that.
[01:41:12.320 --> 01:41:16.320]  Wait, no, we wanted to get out scot free without a writ of execution.
[01:41:16.320 --> 01:41:19.320]  That would be harmful to us.
[01:41:19.320 --> 01:41:24.320]  Yeah, we thought it was hysterical that they said, well, this would be in your best interest
[01:41:24.320 --> 01:41:26.320]  to settle with us.
[01:41:26.320 --> 01:41:27.320]  Really?
[01:41:27.320 --> 01:41:33.320]  Why would it be in our best interest when the judge is likely to give us a much larger judgment?
[01:41:33.320 --> 01:41:36.320]  Well, did you go ahead and bar grieve them for that?
[01:41:36.320 --> 01:41:40.320]  Well, no, that was the, that was not their attorney because they don't have an attorney.
[01:41:40.320 --> 01:41:47.320]  They're working on their own because they've burned every attorney they've hired.
[01:41:47.320 --> 01:41:51.320]  Literally, I figured we'd burn them.
[01:41:51.320 --> 01:41:53.320]  So you could just bar grieve the last attorney they had.
[01:41:53.320 --> 01:41:54.320]  Oops, I'm sorry.
[01:41:54.320 --> 01:41:56.320]  You're not on the case anymore.
[01:41:56.320 --> 01:42:02.320]  Well, I'm actually bar grieving the last attorney they have in the criminal case because I did
[01:42:02.320 --> 01:42:08.320]  find out that he was the one who told, who downloaded that case of mine and told them
[01:42:08.320 --> 01:42:11.320]  to say that I filed lawsuits for a living.
[01:42:11.320 --> 01:42:14.320]  So he's getting a bar grieve, but that's in the criminal.
[01:42:14.320 --> 01:42:15.320]  Yeah.
[01:42:15.320 --> 01:42:18.320]  So he's not going to be happy.
[01:42:18.320 --> 01:42:21.320]  But my next question is slightly different.
[01:42:21.320 --> 01:42:28.320]  It relates to the foreclosure and I found a trustee sale guarantee in my loan file that
[01:42:28.320 --> 01:42:30.320]  I was never supposed to see.
[01:42:30.320 --> 01:42:40.320]  It was ordered on the day they sent the notice of default and it says in there, and it was
[01:42:40.320 --> 01:42:43.320]  by Chicago Title.
[01:42:43.320 --> 01:42:51.320]  And it says that the name of a short is the first substitute trustee, Meridian Foreclosure
[01:42:51.320 --> 01:42:55.320]  Services, with the one with bank as the beneficiary.
[01:42:55.320 --> 01:43:01.320]  It says the title to set a state is vested in my name, et cetera.
[01:43:01.320 --> 01:43:07.320]  And the land referred to it and it says there was a fee paid of $760.
[01:43:07.320 --> 01:43:13.320]  Now, I've been trying to, and that fee was charged to my loan balance.
[01:43:13.320 --> 01:43:20.320]  I have been trying to find out from Chicago Title if there was, if there's a, you know,
[01:43:20.320 --> 01:43:27.320]  a claim, ever a claim on this, do they have, you know, a title number on this?
[01:43:27.320 --> 01:43:33.320]  I've never seen anything like this where it says, you know, a trustee sale.
[01:43:33.320 --> 01:43:35.320]  So they won't answer me.
[01:43:35.320 --> 01:43:39.320]  What can I do on this?
[01:43:39.320 --> 01:43:43.320]  Oh, you're running me off the cliff.
[01:43:43.320 --> 01:43:51.320]  Nothing very truly selfish.
[01:43:51.320 --> 01:43:53.320]  Okay.
[01:43:53.320 --> 01:44:15.320]  Hang on.
[01:44:15.320 --> 01:44:30.320] ırôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôô
[01:44:45.320 --> 01:44:59.040]  Michael Miris Banner or email michaelmiris at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[01:44:59.040 --> 01:45:00.040]  next.
[01:45:00.040 --> 01:45:04.360]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.360 --> 01:45:11.080]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.080 --> 01:45:15.280]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:19.280]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.280 --> 01:45:23.080]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.080 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.520 --> 01:45:39.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.200 --> 01:45:43.520]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:49.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.640 --> 01:45:52.320]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.320 --> 01:46:16.320]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.320 --> 01:46:47.320]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:46:47.320 --> 01:46:59.040]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, with our radio, and we're talking to Tina
[01:46:59.040 --> 01:47:00.040]  in California.
[01:47:00.040 --> 01:47:07.280]  Tina, I'm having a little trouble with stability, I'm losing the high tones.
[01:47:07.280 --> 01:47:11.560]  You were addressing your foreclosure when we went out?
[01:47:11.560 --> 01:47:17.840]  Yes, a trustee's sale guarantee is a document that I found in my loan file that I'm not
[01:47:17.840 --> 01:47:19.340]  supposed to have.
[01:47:19.340 --> 01:47:26.960]  The trustee's sale guarantee was taken out on the very day they filed a notice of default.
[01:47:26.960 --> 01:47:33.040]  They billed, it was the fee for it was $7.65, which they added to my loan balance.
[01:47:33.040 --> 01:47:41.240]  It says the liability is $451,000, the name of assured is the foreclosure service, which
[01:47:41.240 --> 01:47:47.840]  was the first substitute trustee, and the beneficiary was the bank.
[01:47:47.840 --> 01:47:53.960]  And you know, how do I find out if, first of all, why would they pay to take this out
[01:47:53.960 --> 01:47:55.800]  with Chicago Title?
[01:47:55.800 --> 01:48:00.680]  What is a trustee's sale guarantee, and did they get paid on it?
[01:48:00.680 --> 01:48:04.680]  I'm returning my calls to Anthony.
[01:48:04.680 --> 01:48:10.680]  Brett, could you understand that I'm having a terrible time with it?
[01:48:10.680 --> 01:48:16.000]  Well, she, from what I'm gathering, I don't know what the names of these documents mean
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:24.040]  and the assignments of different things to the mortgage players, but it sounds to me
[01:48:24.040 --> 01:48:30.320]  like she has uncovered some fraud when somebody gave her a document that they apparently didn't
[01:48:30.320 --> 01:48:36.560]  realize they were giving her, and it reveals that they were doing something underhanded
[01:48:36.560 --> 01:48:41.160]  about the whole shuffle to get her property.
[01:48:41.160 --> 01:48:45.280]  And now she's trying to figure out what to do about that.
[01:48:45.280 --> 01:48:52.320]  Okay, I'm having trouble understanding you on this medium.
[01:48:52.320 --> 01:48:54.120]  Will you call me tomorrow, Tina?
[01:48:54.120 --> 01:48:59.040]  I will, and in the meantime, I'll send you both this trustee's sale guarantee so you
[01:48:59.040 --> 01:49:06.440]  can read it and try to understand it, because I'm not sure what it means and how to find
[01:49:06.440 --> 01:49:07.960]  out what happened.
[01:49:07.960 --> 01:49:12.360]  And I'll do that in a way so that you can go to one more caller before the show ends.
[01:49:12.360 --> 01:49:14.360]  Okay, thank you, Tina.
[01:49:14.360 --> 01:49:16.360]  Okay, thank you.
[01:49:16.360 --> 01:49:22.200]  Okay, now, we've got two callers, we've got Charles and Georgia, but we've also got Jill
[01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:23.200]  and Oregon.
[01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:32.280]  It looks like a first-time caller, Brett, your call, Jill or Charles?
[01:49:32.280 --> 01:49:39.920]  Well, I know that Jill was trying to call in earlier, I don't know if it was, we had
[01:49:39.920 --> 01:49:44.720]  a, when your call board was on and off.
[01:49:44.720 --> 01:49:47.920]  Yeah, let me see if she's a first-time caller.
[01:49:47.920 --> 01:49:50.320]  Jill, are you there?
[01:49:50.320 --> 01:49:52.320]  Yes.
[01:49:52.320 --> 01:49:53.320]  Are you a first-time caller?
[01:49:53.320 --> 01:49:57.320]  No, I called in last year.
[01:49:57.320 --> 01:50:02.960]  Okay, and I need to take Charles first, he's been on quite a bit longer.
[01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:03.960]  Okay.
[01:50:03.960 --> 01:50:07.960]  Let me take Charles, maybe he won't be real, take a long time.
[01:50:07.960 --> 01:50:12.520]  Okay, Charles, what do you have for us today?
[01:50:12.520 --> 01:50:15.400]  How are you doing today, Randy?
[01:50:15.400 --> 01:50:16.400]  Doing good.
[01:50:16.400 --> 01:50:21.880]  I just had a quick question, and then you can get right to Jill.
[01:50:21.880 --> 01:50:29.720]  I've been thinking about Olivier for the last couple of months, and I was wondering, had
[01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:37.760]  he gotten anywhere with the vague, I'm sorry, void for vagueness.
[01:50:37.760 --> 01:50:44.080]  He hasn't, I haven't heard from him in quite a while.
[01:50:44.080 --> 01:50:51.120]  If you will send me an email and ask about Marty Shay, I will forward that to him.
[01:50:51.120 --> 01:50:57.320]  He'll remind me of contact him, I'll get his email and forward your comments and your questions
[01:50:57.320 --> 01:50:58.320]  to him.
[01:50:58.320 --> 01:50:59.320]  Okay, no problem.
[01:50:59.320 --> 01:51:00.320]  No problem.
[01:51:00.320 --> 01:51:01.320]  Thanks a lot, Randy.
[01:51:01.320 --> 01:51:04.320]  I'll talk to you guys in a minute.
[01:51:04.320 --> 01:51:05.320]  Okay.
[01:51:05.320 --> 01:51:06.320]  Thank you, Charles.
[01:51:06.320 --> 01:51:08.480]  Now we're going back to Jill and Oregon.
[01:51:08.480 --> 01:51:11.640]  Okay, Jill, what do you have for us today?
[01:51:11.640 --> 01:51:14.200]  So, I called last year.
[01:51:14.200 --> 01:51:20.200]  I was a teacher who was fired because of Kate Brown's Vag's mandate.
[01:51:20.200 --> 01:51:27.880]  And I'm planning to sue everyone from Kate Brown down the line, the health authority,
[01:51:27.880 --> 01:51:33.120]  my school, HR, the union, everyone.
[01:51:33.120 --> 01:51:38.440]  When I called last year, you suggested that I do a petition for declaratory judgment,
[01:51:38.440 --> 01:51:41.840]  and I did that against the health authority.
[01:51:41.840 --> 01:51:46.560]  Basically, I was a...
[01:51:46.560 --> 01:51:49.160]  What question did you ask?
[01:51:49.160 --> 01:51:58.120]  The last time, you suggested that I do the declaratory judgment to kind of get my feet
[01:51:58.120 --> 01:52:09.480]  wet and to get a ruling on something that would trigger fault, basically.
[01:52:09.480 --> 01:52:20.600]  So what I did was I filed a suit to see if the health authority acted out of scope.
[01:52:20.600 --> 01:52:27.880]  And what happened was after a long fight in the circuit court, the assistant attorney
[01:52:27.880 --> 01:52:34.400]  general managed to get it transferred to the court of appeals, which has exclusive jurisdiction
[01:52:34.400 --> 01:52:40.760]  over Administrative Procedure Act claims.
[01:52:40.760 --> 01:52:47.960]  Now the problem is adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act is limited,
[01:52:47.960 --> 01:52:52.920]  and the only thing I can get from that would be an invalidation of the rule, which is not
[01:52:52.920 --> 01:52:54.520]  what I want.
[01:52:54.520 --> 01:53:00.040]  I want a judgment saying that the OHA acted out of scope.
[01:53:00.040 --> 01:53:04.920]  Now at this point in time, I am ready to file suit against all of them.
[01:53:04.920 --> 01:53:09.120]  Okay, okay, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:53:09.120 --> 01:53:10.120]  You're asking...
[01:53:10.120 --> 01:53:16.120]  Okay, they're looking to invalidate the rule, and that will give you...
[01:53:16.120 --> 01:53:20.400]  That will essentially give you what you want.
[01:53:20.400 --> 01:53:21.400]  Not quite.
[01:53:21.400 --> 01:53:22.400]  No.
[01:53:22.400 --> 01:53:23.400]  No, it won't.
[01:53:23.400 --> 01:53:24.400]  Not quite.
[01:53:24.400 --> 01:53:27.400]  It'll kind of be a thing that it wasn't valid, right?
[01:53:27.400 --> 01:53:28.400]  Yeah.
[01:53:28.400 --> 01:53:34.480]  But it's not expo facto.
[01:53:34.480 --> 01:53:46.520]  If they rule that the rule is invalid, then the litigant can claim that they acted in
[01:53:46.520 --> 01:53:47.640]  good faith reliance.
[01:53:47.640 --> 01:53:49.000]  So I see where you're going.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:51.120]  How do you plan to fix that?
[01:53:51.120 --> 01:53:59.360]  So I'm thinking of actually filing an objection to the court's ruling that is an Administrative
[01:53:59.360 --> 01:54:06.280]  Procedure Act and then just dismissing that case, because I don't think it's going to
[01:54:06.280 --> 01:54:13.680]  help me for me to pursue it under the Administrative Procedure Act, because my main intention
[01:54:13.680 --> 01:54:16.760]  was never to invalidate the rule.
[01:54:16.760 --> 01:54:23.680]  My main intention was that they acted out of scope, and I was wondering what your thoughts
[01:54:23.680 --> 01:54:26.240]  were on that.
[01:54:26.240 --> 01:54:30.960]  I'm thinking about declaratory judgment.
[01:54:30.960 --> 01:54:32.400]  You might file an...
[01:54:32.400 --> 01:54:34.120]  Have they filed a...
[01:54:34.120 --> 01:54:35.120]  Okay.
[01:54:35.120 --> 01:54:36.920]  How did we get to this place?
[01:54:36.920 --> 01:54:43.040]  What I'm getting to is, do we file an appeal or do we file an objection?
[01:54:43.040 --> 01:54:50.400]  Have they filed something that's not a dispositive ruling?
[01:54:50.400 --> 01:54:57.760]  So what happened was the trial court can refer the case to the Appeals Court if it's not
[01:54:57.760 --> 01:55:00.200]  sure on its jurisdiction.
[01:55:00.200 --> 01:55:02.280]  It went to the Appeals Court.
[01:55:02.280 --> 01:55:07.160]  The Magistrate of the Appeals Court determined that it was an Administrative Procedure
[01:55:07.160 --> 01:55:08.160]  Act suit.
[01:55:08.160 --> 01:55:14.320]  They asked a motion for reconsideration and clarification on why they were ruling outside
[01:55:14.320 --> 01:55:21.280]  of the pleading, and yesterday I got a ruling back from the judges denying my motion without
[01:55:21.280 --> 01:55:22.640]  any reasons.
[01:55:22.640 --> 01:55:24.640]  Oh, okay.
[01:55:24.640 --> 01:55:29.040]  I saw your comment on the Telegram channel.
[01:55:29.040 --> 01:55:34.120]  Yes, request findings of fact and conclusions at law.
[01:55:34.120 --> 01:55:40.600]  Actually, for my unemployment, that's a different case.
[01:55:40.600 --> 01:55:48.320]  So I got two denials, and both of them did not have findings of fact.
[01:55:48.320 --> 01:55:54.680]  And for the declaratory judgment case, I actually already filed for a request of findings of
[01:55:54.680 --> 01:56:01.720]  fact under the Petition for Reconsideration, and they denied everything with no reason
[01:56:01.720 --> 01:56:02.720]  given.
[01:56:02.720 --> 01:56:08.000]  Then that would be, okay, that was in the appellate court.
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:11.880]  Can they deny a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law?
[01:56:11.880 --> 01:56:14.240]  Is that something they get to deny?
[01:56:14.240 --> 01:56:19.960]  Or is that an administrative duty they have to respond to that request?
[01:56:19.960 --> 01:56:23.640]  Okay, this is Oregon State and not Fed.
[01:56:23.640 --> 01:56:30.040]  This is Oregon State Appeals Court, so it's the second highest court before the State
[01:56:30.040 --> 01:56:31.040]  Court.
[01:56:31.040 --> 01:56:35.800]  And that depends on the Oregon State law.
[01:56:35.800 --> 01:56:45.080]  In the Fed, you don't have a ruling until you have both an order and a judgment.
[01:56:45.080 --> 01:56:48.600]  The judgment is findings of fact, but the state is different.
[01:56:48.600 --> 01:56:54.080]  So I would suggest petition for a cert.
[01:56:54.080 --> 01:57:04.440]  Or petition the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus, asking the Supreme Court to order
[01:57:04.440 --> 01:57:09.040]  the Court of Appeals to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[01:57:09.040 --> 01:57:16.000]  Because in not giving you that, they've denied you and your right to appeal.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:19.840]  You can't appeal because you don't know what to appeal.
[01:57:19.840 --> 01:57:26.960]  An appeal can only be made based on a rule of law.
[01:57:26.960 --> 01:57:34.280]  You maintain that the court abused this discretion by failing to properly apply the law to the
[01:57:34.280 --> 01:57:38.400]  facts, but they didn't tell you what they did.
[01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:40.360]  So they denied you and your right to appeal.
[01:57:40.360 --> 01:57:46.040]  So petition the Court of the Supreme for a mandamus ordering them to give you findings
[01:57:46.040 --> 01:57:47.040]  of fact.
[01:57:47.040 --> 01:57:54.040]  Okay, and should I do this for both my declaratory judgment suit as well as my unemployment suit?
[01:57:54.040 --> 01:57:56.040]  I think I should.
[01:57:56.040 --> 01:57:58.040]  Yes, absolutely.
[01:57:58.040 --> 01:58:01.040]  They have denied you and your right to appeal.
[01:58:01.040 --> 01:58:02.040]  Okay.
[01:58:02.040 --> 01:58:05.040]  Because they didn't tell you what to appeal.
[01:58:05.040 --> 01:58:08.040]  Can I ask a real quick question?
[01:58:08.040 --> 01:58:12.040]  There are vacancies coming up for the school board.
[01:58:12.040 --> 01:58:15.040]  What are your thoughts on the Iranians?
[01:58:15.040 --> 01:58:18.040]  Read that idea.
[01:58:18.040 --> 01:58:21.040]  Absolutely one.
[01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:26.040]  We'll advertise on here, but we are out of time.
[01:58:26.040 --> 01:58:29.040]  Call us back tomorrow night to have more questions.
[01:58:29.040 --> 01:58:31.040]  We'll have a four-hour show.
[01:58:31.040 --> 01:58:32.040]  We'll have more time.
[01:58:32.040 --> 01:58:33.040]  This is Randy Kelton.
[01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:36.040]  We're at Fountain Rule of the Radio.
[01:58:36.040 --> 01:58:38.040]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:38.040 --> 01:58:44.040]  We'll be back tomorrow night for our regular four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:44.040 --> 01:58:47.040]  We're at, say something insightful.
[01:58:47.040 --> 01:58:49.040]  You've got three seconds.
[01:58:49.040 --> 01:58:50.040]  Y'all call me?
[01:58:50.040 --> 01:58:56.480]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.480 --> 01:58:57.680]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.680 --> 01:59:02.660]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.660 --> 01:59:08.320]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.320 --> 01:59:11.640]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.640 --> 01:59:20.600]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.600 --> 01:59:26.120]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.120 --> 01:59:30.160]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.160 --> 01:59:32.680]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.680 --> 01:59:41.080]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.080 --> 01:59:48.080]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.