ROL_2023-02-27_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.000 --> 00:09.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.000 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your first amendment rights.
[00:16.000 --> 00:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.000 --> 00:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.000 --> 00:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.000 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 01:10.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:10.000 --> 01:14.000]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.000 --> 01:17.000]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:37.000]  Pressure. We usually associate it with stress and negativity, but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing.
[01:37.000 --> 01:42.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can be cured
[01:42.000 --> 01:45.000]  using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[01:45.000 --> 01:47.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:47.000 --> 01:51.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.000 --> 01:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.000 --> 02:03.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:03.000 --> 02:07.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:07.000 --> 02:11.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.000 --> 02:34.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:42.000 --> 02:48.000]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands,
[02:48.000 --> 02:51.000]  but this relief is free and always on hand.
[02:51.000 --> 03:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.000 --> 03:30.000]  Alright folks, good evening.
[03:30.000 --> 03:33.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig.
[03:33.000 --> 03:36.000]  It is February 27th, 2023.
[03:36.000 --> 03:38.000]  We are live tonight.
[03:38.000 --> 03:41.000]  I am here and I am ready to talk.
[03:41.000 --> 03:47.000]  Now, I know normally this show is used to teach you stuff about the law and things like that,
[03:47.000 --> 03:53.000]  but I've kind of got something I need to get some help with out there from you listeners
[03:53.000 --> 03:59.000]  that are more capable in some of the areas I'm going to be discussing than I am.
[03:59.000 --> 04:07.000]  Now, you all know I spend a great deal of my time digging into the things that I talk about on this show,
[04:07.000 --> 04:11.000]  researching it, trying to connect all the dots together so I have a complete picture
[04:11.000 --> 04:16.000]  and then I try to bring that on the air and explain it to you guys.
[04:16.000 --> 04:27.000]  Now, we're seeing a mass exodus from the viewership of the mainstream media and for good reason.
[04:27.000 --> 04:29.000]  They're a bunch of liars.
[04:29.000 --> 04:34.000]  They're not working for the truth.
[04:34.000 --> 04:37.000]  They're not working for the benefit of the public.
[04:37.000 --> 04:45.000]  They are working for the benefit only of those in power to control the narrative they want us to have.
[04:45.000 --> 04:53.000]  Now, that said, that has not ever been a problem this network has faced because we don't do that.
[04:53.000 --> 04:57.000]  At least my show doesn't do that and I'm pretty sure Randy's show doesn't do that.
[04:57.000 --> 05:01.000]  I can't speak to all the other ones that's ever been on here,
[05:01.000 --> 05:07.000]  but I can say that most of the ones that I've listened to on this and everything on this network,
[05:07.000 --> 05:09.000]  we don't fall into that category.
[05:09.000 --> 05:18.000]  We try to bring you the information as truthfully and honestly and with as much fact-based research as we possibly can.
[05:18.000 --> 05:25.000]  We try to point you to everything we're using as our source material so that you can verify it for yourself.
[05:25.000 --> 05:46.000]  Now, I've watched countless thousands of hours of videos and read court documents and read all kinds of things on various subjects for the last 10 years
[05:46.000 --> 05:55.000]  about all these things that are happening with the cop watching now the calling themselves First Amendment auditors, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[05:55.000 --> 05:58.000]  Then we have programs coming out like Project Veritas.
[05:58.000 --> 06:03.000]  We've had Alex Jones for years and years, things like that.
[06:03.000 --> 06:19.000]  We've got, let's see, the Next News Network now, which I only look at the first few minutes of. I don't watch the whole thing because they tend to repeat the same thing a couple of times
[06:19.000 --> 06:22.000]  and it gets kind of annoying when they do that, but still.
[06:22.000 --> 06:28.000]  The point is that there's a lot of independent sources out there to get information from now.
[06:28.000 --> 06:43.000]  Some of them are falling into the ditch, so to speak, on using the same type of clickbait captioning of their videos and stories and everything else just to get you to click on it,
[06:43.000 --> 06:51.000]  just to have it be anti-climactic when you actually go view it or read it because it's not exactly what they're playing it up to be.
[06:51.000 --> 06:54.000]  They just want the clicks.
[06:54.000 --> 07:04.000]  Well, all of this viewing and reading and researching and everything has left me in a quandary.
[07:04.000 --> 07:11.000]  Doing what I do to eat up a lot of time, okay, a lot of time.
[07:11.000 --> 07:25.000]  And I have to do whatever I can to pad the bills and the money on the side of that as much as I can to make sure I can at least keep a roof over my head, food in my mouth and my dog's fit.
[07:25.000 --> 07:31.000]  Not an easy chore with the way things are going up with this president that we have.
[07:31.000 --> 07:35.000]  We didn't want, but we have nonetheless.
[07:35.000 --> 07:44.000]  And all the morons in charge that are making things worse by not fixing the problem, just paying lip service to fixing the problem.
[07:44.000 --> 07:58.000]  If you think any of these parties and any of these people are truly in this for you and me, you have obviously not been paying attention, okay?
[07:58.000 --> 08:16.000]  They will tell you things and tell you things until you realize that they have more than enough opportunities in the last half century to fix the problems they keep fighting over and not either party has done it.
[08:16.000 --> 08:18.000]  Not either one of them.
[08:18.000 --> 08:29.000]  For instance, if people wanted to actually tell the truth about the income tax like Ron Paul was trying to do, they would have done that by now.
[08:29.000 --> 08:49.000]  They would have made law that prevented the IRS from illegally assessing taxes against Americans paychecks and stealing their freaking money and made them educate the employers on how the law actually is written so that they would stop stealing the employee's money through fraud and deception.
[08:49.000 --> 08:51.000]  But they haven't done it.
[08:51.000 --> 09:01.000]  They would fix Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security by realizing the Constitution doesn't authorize the federal government to conduct such programs.
[09:01.000 --> 09:04.000]  And it never ever did.
[09:04.000 --> 09:13.000]  Those are Roosevelt era socialist programs that the Constitution forbids the federal government to engage in.
[09:13.000 --> 09:15.000]  And yet they keep doing them.
[09:15.000 --> 09:21.000]  And now they keep saying that we can't be the ones to sunset them because we won't get reelected.
[09:21.000 --> 09:25.000]  And that's exactly what it's always about.
[09:25.000 --> 09:30.000]  When they bring up the talking point, oh, no, no, no, we're not trying to sunset it, blah, blah, blah.
[09:30.000 --> 09:32.000]  They're trying to stay in office.
[09:32.000 --> 09:37.000]  They're not trying to follow the Constitution.
[09:37.000 --> 09:46.000]  So like I said, if you think any of these people are doing the right thing for you and I, you're wrong.
[09:46.000 --> 10:03.000]  You're dead wrong because none of them are actually intending and willing to do whatever it takes to follow the Constitution properly and completely, which is what is best for all of us.
[10:03.000 --> 10:07.000]  And they won't do it.
[10:07.000 --> 10:13.000]  And for years and years and years, I have asked myself, why?
[10:13.000 --> 10:26.000]  Well, it's because we don't have enough educated informed people in this country to recognize the bullshit, pardon my French, that we that is being shoveled on our plate day in and day out.
[10:26.000 --> 10:33.000]  And then somebody handing us a fork and say, eat that, it's good for you.
[10:33.000 --> 10:40.000]  But that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you're being fed on a regular basis.
[10:40.000 --> 10:43.000]  By those, we keep electing to public office.
[10:43.000 --> 10:46.000]  And I shouldn't say we, I don't vote for these idiots.
[10:46.000 --> 10:48.000]  I don't vote for any of them.
[10:48.000 --> 10:50.000]  Oh, well, then you're part of the problem.
[10:50.000 --> 10:51.000]  No.
[10:51.000 --> 10:52.000]  Okay.
[10:52.000 --> 10:58.000]  And that's like saying that I refuse to kill my neighbor just because they're a bad neighbor.
[10:58.000 --> 10:59.000]  Okay.
[10:59.000 --> 11:06.000]  I'm not going to vote for somebody I know that's going to oppress me and my neighbors.
[11:06.000 --> 11:08.000]  Okay.
[11:08.000 --> 11:21.000]  Because by me voting to put that person in office, when I know full well they're not going there to do the job they're being elected for, that is being a freaking hypocrite.
[11:21.000 --> 11:27.000]  And I'm just not willing to do that.
[11:27.000 --> 11:39.000]  I cannot cast a vote for the lesser of two evils any more than I can cast a vote for the higher of the two evils.
[11:39.000 --> 11:43.000]  Can't do it, won't do it.
[11:43.000 --> 11:50.000]  So all this has led me to thinking of what can we do about this and how can we do it?
[11:50.000 --> 11:56.000]  Well, this is where the listeners to this show can help.
[11:56.000 --> 11:59.000]  I am not a marketing guy.
[11:59.000 --> 12:02.000]  I am not a corporate entity guy.
[12:02.000 --> 12:12.000]  I am not a guy that is a CEO material, CFO material, CIO maybe, but that'd be about it.
[12:12.000 --> 12:13.000]  Okay.
[12:13.000 --> 12:33.000]  But the point is, is if you go on YouTube and you look at all the disparate organizations and individuals trying to change the paradigm by doing the right thing, such as First Amendment auditing, cop watching, et cetera, et cetera,
[12:33.000 --> 12:47.000]  exposing the truth through secret investigations like Project Veritas, et cetera, et cetera, and actually going through and giving out news that the mainstream media won't touch with a 10 foot pole.
[12:47.000 --> 12:48.000]  All right.
[12:48.000 --> 12:52.000]  And making it publicly available.
[12:52.000 --> 12:58.000]  What can we do to better facilitate that activity?
[12:58.000 --> 13:02.000]  All of those activities in fact.
[13:02.000 --> 13:06.000]  Well, I got to think it.
[13:06.000 --> 13:21.000]  I want to try to figure out a way to set up an organization that puts all of these individual things together in a cohesive, collective communications system.
[13:21.000 --> 13:22.000]  Okay.
[13:22.000 --> 13:32.000]  Basically, where we put together a way to train individuals to do these things like the First Amendment auditing and everything. Yes, I know it's not difficult to do and everything.
[13:32.000 --> 13:51.000]  But if we do this the right way, we can teach people the proper way to respond to police questions and to support each other and so on and so forth so that we can actually curb the errant behavior of our public officials to a greater degree
[13:51.000 --> 13:54.000]  and protect each other in the process.
[13:54.000 --> 14:02.000]  Not to mention, now, if we get organized, we get funded, we get everything in place.
[14:02.000 --> 14:18.000]  I mean, if the leftist can get funded by people like Soros, why can't we get funded by people the opposite of Soros if we will do something that matters and we can make it where they go that I can support?
[14:18.000 --> 14:33.000]  If we can figure out a way to organize all these individual cop watchers and First Amendment auditors and educate them all properly on their individual state laws and how best to use them, when to use them, et cetera, et cetera,
[14:33.000 --> 14:55.000]  and make a new level of auditor and cop watcher and even be able at that point to provide them with legal assistance should the cops or anybody else do something they're not supposed to do,
[14:55.000 --> 15:02.000]  we could literally change the landscape that is in front of us for the better.
[15:02.000 --> 15:10.000]  Now, I don't know all the ins and outs of organizing something on that scale, have no clue about it.
[15:10.000 --> 15:25.000]  I do know it happens, I do know it's out there, but I don't know how to make it all gel, okay?
[15:25.000 --> 15:40.000]  But there are people out there who do, or at least enough of the individual parts that those people could come together and we could all work together to make something cohesive and useful.
[15:40.000 --> 15:54.000]  We get something like this organized, we get everybody working together, we get everybody on the same page, we get everything set up so that we are no longer reliant on the social media networks for our platforms,
[15:54.000 --> 16:13.000]  that we all have our own unified platform that we control in its entirety and that we can do what needs to be done with and there's no censorship for it, nothing other than the absolutely illegal stuff like child pornography and things like that.
[16:13.000 --> 16:19.000]  There wouldn't be anything to prevent us from organizing our own platform that way.
[16:19.000 --> 16:24.000]  It just takes funding and know-how.
[16:24.000 --> 16:40.000]  But if we could do that, we could change everything and we could do it quickly because the more educated we make, everybody is safer we are to come.
[16:40.000 --> 16:51.000]  And the less these people can get away with in the dark of the night because we're always shining a light into the dark corners where they're trying to do it.
[16:51.000 --> 16:57.000]  Alright folks, we're going to take a quick break. 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[16:57.000 --> 17:00.000]  Give me a call, let's talk.
[17:00.000 --> 17:17.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[17:17.000 --> 17:31.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[17:31.000 --> 17:38.000]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[17:38.000 --> 17:49.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[17:49.000 --> 18:09.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[18:20.000 --> 18:34.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.000 --> 18:49.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is THE solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:11.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:19.000 --> 19:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[19:34.000 --> 19:50.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[19:50.000 --> 20:05.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[20:05.000 --> 20:32.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[20:32.000 --> 20:39.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[20:39.000 --> 20:42.000]  Give us a call, get in line, the phones are on.
[20:42.000 --> 20:45.000]  Okay, real quick before we start getting callers.
[20:45.000 --> 21:00.000]  Now, I can say I'm bringing this up because there's an opportunity here to make us stronger than we've ever been.
[21:00.000 --> 21:07.000]  At one point when I was on here regularly every week and everything, I had the most popular show on this network.
[21:07.000 --> 21:18.000]  I'm hoping to get back there again with the listeners and everything else and getting people back to the point of having the information to be able to call in and all that.
[21:18.000 --> 21:29.000]  I'm still working on getting enough money to keep the hardware running and everything to make that happen, but still, the point is, I'm here, I'm trying and I will continue to try.
[21:29.000 --> 21:54.000]  So, that said, if you have know-how in doing the kinds of things I was talking about in the first segment, which is getting things on that scale organized and regulated to the point where we can get funding for a project of that size,
[21:54.000 --> 22:14.000]  how to get it, who to go to to get it, et cetera, et cetera, and then how to set up training and other information that would actually have to be on a state by state basis because the laws will vary bit to bit in every state on how certain things work.
[22:14.000 --> 22:38.000]  Then reach out to me via email. The email address is eddedieatruleoflawradio.com and send me your ideas, send me the information that you have on how to do this because I'm really, really, really interested in trying to find a way to make us collectively stronger
[22:38.000 --> 22:49.000]  so that we can do more, do it better, and make a change before things are too far along to ever get corrected.
[22:49.000 --> 22:58.000]  Okay, that said, we have our first caller up on the board. This is Marty in Minnesota. Marty, what can we do for you?
[22:58.000 --> 23:00.000]  Hey, Eddie, can you hear me all right?
[23:00.000 --> 23:02.000]  Yes, sir, I can.
[23:02.000 --> 23:16.000]  All right. Well, I was just calling in. I'm helping a gentleman with a court case, and so I wanted to kind of just run it by you and see if I'm missing anything or not because it's kind of interesting.
[23:16.000 --> 23:34.000]  And so this gentleman was, but on a quick side note to your introductory discussion there, I just want to mention, I was reading, it's just amazing if you read Henry Thoreau's Civil Disobedience.
[23:34.000 --> 23:52.000]  I was just reading that yesterday, and it was just amazing the parallel he cites in there of what was happening back then, which is today, which it's just amazing to kind of realize how things have kind of never really changed.
[23:52.000 --> 24:06.000]  But yeah, so this gentleman's court case, he was pulled over in a four-wheeler for not having a license.
[24:06.000 --> 24:28.000]  So me, I said, hey, well, let's look into this. Let's go look at the charge and all that. And the charge they were charging him with was actually, it was under the DNR code, the Department of Natural Resources here in Minnesota, and the charge was actually for useful operators.
[24:28.000 --> 24:46.000]  And so we went, I said, well, let's go pull up that statute. We went and looked at the statute. I went to the law library and pulled up the originating law for the statute, and it was obvious that the statute, the law, the statute didn't reflect the law.
[24:46.000 --> 25:01.000]  The statute was following the single subject rule. It was just for useful operators. And apparently in the statute, they snuck in some language that said that you also need to have a driver's license.
[25:01.000 --> 25:12.000]  And so when we raised that issue at court, they immediately dismissed the charges. We had a bunch of motions before the court too.
[25:12.000 --> 25:22.000]  And I don't, I'm sorry, Eddie, I haven't listened in quite some time just because I'm kind of off the grid and I'm not always able to tune in.
[25:22.000 --> 25:36.000]  So I don't know if you've probably touched on this, but everything was done electronically now, like through a video conference thing over a, you know, a book, a little lab computer or whatever.
[25:36.000 --> 25:48.000]  So everything was even done from right here. But so they immediately dismissed the charge. He was charged with the judge.
[25:48.000 --> 25:56.000]  Well, when you say immediately, define immediately, when, at what point of the process did they dismiss the charge?
[25:56.000 --> 26:07.000]  Okay, so this was pre-trial conference because first he was arraigned. I said, no, no, no, we got to put in some motions. You got to, you know, so I filed a motion to withdraw the plea.
[26:07.000 --> 26:23.000]  I filed a motion for challenge to jurisdiction and several other things too, citing how that the, because we, you know, citing the actual law and that it originated for the statute and all that.
[26:23.000 --> 26:33.000]  And so we, the, we're all sitting here for the conference. The conference began, he was actually the first one called.
[26:33.000 --> 26:47.000]  And then so before he even got a chance to talk, you know, she addressed the prosecutor and the prosecutor, she asked the prosecutor what she wanted to do and she said, okay, we're going to drop this and we're going to dismiss the charge.
[26:47.000 --> 26:58.000]  And so they dismissed that charge and, and, and knowing their shenanigans, I was sitting there listening and she says, but we'll, we'll, we might charge him another charge by mail.
[26:58.000 --> 27:09.000]  And I said, object. So immediately Dave objected and, and the judge shot him down and said, you're dismissed. It's been dismissed. You're done here.
[27:09.000 --> 27:25.000]  And so she didn't address his motions or anything. They just said this was dismissed. So then after that all happened, he now received paperwork in the mail with new charges, charging him in a new court case.
[27:25.000 --> 27:41.000]  And a lot of this goes to the whole, which she threatened him for originally was, you know, prosecutor was threatening him with charging him for driving after being inimical declared inimical to public safety and all this 20 years ago.
[27:41.000 --> 27:58.000]  So he didn't ever have that reestablished as a valid license, so to speak, from the 20 years ago issue. But he had his, he was in his four wheeler, which they now want to say was a motor vehicle.
[27:58.000 --> 28:08.000]  So I want to say the most obvious issue I was going after them for double jeopardy, which is what I was going to raise now.
[28:08.000 --> 28:14.000]  Well, you can't go after them for double jeopardy because you never went to trial on merits.
[28:14.000 --> 28:25.000]  Had you, had you addressed this the day it was set for trial and that had dismissed it, that had been the end of it. They could not have come back and done it again.
[28:25.000 --> 28:37.000]  But because you got it dismissed before it went to trial, you gave them the opportunity to reset everything and find something else to try to charging with.
[28:37.000 --> 28:40.000]  And that's what they took advantage of.
[28:40.000 --> 28:43.000]  Okay.
[28:43.000 --> 28:59.000]  So what would you say about this? The person they have, the person that filed, so now they filed a complaint in a different court case and the person that is the complainant isn't even the officer that was there.
[28:59.000 --> 29:11.000]  Well, I don't know how it is in Minnesota, but here the person signing the complaint does not have to be a fact witness. They don't have to have been present.
[29:11.000 --> 29:23.000]  They only, if the complaint says I have reason to believe and do believe, then they're just basing it upon what they believe, not what they actually know.
[29:23.000 --> 29:25.000]  Okay.
[29:25.000 --> 29:33.000]  So you need to check and see what the criteria for a criminal complaint is in Minnesota.
[29:33.000 --> 29:35.000]  Okay.
[29:35.000 --> 29:41.000]  Hang on just a second. Let me take this break and we'll come back and keep going. Okay.
[29:41.000 --> 29:43.000]  Okay. Thank you.
[29:43.000 --> 30:02.000]  Folks, this is rule of law radio Monday night show with your host Eddie Craig. It is February 27, 2023. We are live tonight calling number 5126461984. Give us a call at start. We will be right back.
[30:02.000 --> 30:15.000]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government cover up in a moment.
[30:15.000 --> 30:25.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.000 --> 30:33.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.000 --> 30:44.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:53.000]  Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida.
[30:53.000 --> 30:59.000]  This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.000 --> 31:07.000]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing.
[31:07.000 --> 31:13.000]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[31:13.000 --> 31:21.000]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:21.000 --> 31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:51.000 --> 32:01.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:21.000 --> 32:26.000]  This is the best expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:36.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:48.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.000 --> 32:54.000]  With research documents and other useful resource material, learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 33:19.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.000 --> 33:33.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling member 512-646-1984.
[33:33.000 --> 33:41.000]  It is February 27th, 2023. We are live tonight and we are currently talking to Marty in Minnesota.
[33:41.000 --> 33:44.000]  Alright Marty, please continue.
[33:44.000 --> 34:00.000]  Well, so I guess that, I'm glad I asked you about that. I would have made a mistake then because, I mean, I figured that was pretty clear and obvious that they were dismissed the one charge, you know, without even hearing his motions.
[34:00.000 --> 34:05.000]  I guess that's typical, but it seemed like certain double jeopardy to me.
[34:05.000 --> 34:19.000]  Yeah, no, it's only double jeopardy if he's actually been acquitted or convicted and they're trying him on the same, for additional or the same charges for the same set of events.
[34:19.000 --> 34:26.000]  Okay, if he went to trial and it got dismissed, then that would have been double jeopardy.
[34:26.000 --> 34:33.000]  If it went to trial, got convicted and it had later been dismissed, then that would be double jeopardy.
[34:33.000 --> 34:42.000]  But until it gets to trial on the merits, if they dismissed before that happens, it is not double jeopardy.
[34:42.000 --> 34:50.000]  That's a bummer because I was like, you know, because he's certainly got a range twice. So it seems like, you know, they're putting you through a process twice.
[34:50.000 --> 34:58.000]  Well, the process is intended to make you quit, surrender and pay. That's always what it's about. It's got nothing to do with justice.
[34:58.000 --> 35:06.000]  It has to do with putting you in a predicament where you're missing work, you're on the verge of getting fired for missing work.
[35:06.000 --> 35:15.000]  It's to create a financial burden and time constraint on you that they don't have.
[35:15.000 --> 35:25.000]  And so they can make you just count out to them by putting you in that vice grip, so to speak, and just turning the handle when they need to.
[35:25.000 --> 35:35.000]  So what would you say about the whole issue where the statute doesn't match the originating law?
[35:35.000 --> 35:42.000]  Well, then the statute needs to be challenged as unconstitutional, but you're not going to get the chance to do that now that they dismissed that charge.
[35:42.000 --> 35:51.000]  Now you've got to figure out what to do with the statutes they are charging him under. You need to look at them and see what holes they've got.
[35:51.000 --> 36:06.000]  Well, the interesting thing to me is that as far as the DNR officer that pulled them over and they're still attacking this from the DNR, but they don't have a traffic authority.
[36:06.000 --> 36:09.000]  Are you sure about that?
[36:09.000 --> 36:12.000]  Yeah, absolutely.
[36:12.000 --> 36:14.000]  Well, here's the thing.
[36:14.000 --> 36:24.000]  If you read the Natural Resources Code for your state, which is what it's called here in Texas, you will find out that Game Wardens is what they're called here.
[36:24.000 --> 36:37.000]  Their authority is limited to what happens in parks, on roads and trails in parks, not on the actual roadways.
[36:37.000 --> 36:40.000]  Right, and that's the same here.
[36:40.000 --> 36:54.000]  Then the issuing officer, the argument would then be if you can prove that there was no legal authority for that guy to that Game Warden to initiate a stop on a public road,
[36:54.000 --> 37:05.000]  then you can fight this based upon by getting everything suppressed for an illegal search and seizure based upon a false arrest or false imprisonment,
[37:05.000 --> 37:19.000]  which is what occurred when the Game Warden initiated a stop and held the individual in place without his consent when he had no legitimate legal authority to do so.
[37:19.000 --> 37:22.000]  And that would be fruit of the poison tree.
[37:22.000 --> 37:26.000]  That would make everything that follows fruit of the poison tree, yes.
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.000]  So do we need to request a probable cause hearing? Is that ideal?
[37:30.000 --> 37:36.000]  Well, probable cause hearings are supposed to be done automatically, but they're not.
[37:36.000 --> 37:51.000]  But you absolutely want to do that, but you need to have all your ducks in a row just like you would for trial because a probable cause hearing is exactly the same thing as a trial minus the sitting jury.
[37:51.000 --> 37:56.000]  Okay.
[37:56.000 --> 38:02.000]  Interesting. Well, and we were figuring to request a jury trial for this.
[38:02.000 --> 38:11.000]  Well, unless you feel you're going to get the chance to educate the jury on the law, that could be more dangerous than you think.
[38:11.000 --> 38:13.000]  Right.
[38:13.000 --> 38:15.000]  Yeah.
[38:15.000 --> 38:20.000]  Well, but I am in Minnesota too, Eddie, you know how corrupted is here.
[38:20.000 --> 38:30.000]  Well, corrupt is one thing, but ignorance is not any better when it works against you in exactly the same way.
[38:30.000 --> 38:38.000]  And an ignorant jury can send you to jail or take your money just as easily as a corrupt system can.
[38:38.000 --> 38:52.000]  And that's where they're using the best one part. I still have to, I have a hard time tackling, which is they've got the definition for motor vehicle in the driver's code and then in the
[38:52.000 --> 38:54.000]  Okay, stop, stop, stop.
[38:54.000 --> 39:00.000]  He wants to know what the definition of a motor vehicle is relative to the statute he's being charged under.
[39:00.000 --> 39:17.000]  If the definition of motor vehicle in that statute does not include four-wheelers and motorcycles, and that's what the complaint actually says is a motor vehicle, they've already lost.
[39:17.000 --> 39:34.000]  Say that again. That's what the statute actually requires is a motor vehicle, and the statute in question does not have motorcycles and four-wheelers included in that definition of motor vehicle, then that statute does not apply.
[39:34.000 --> 39:45.000]  And you're basically, that's turning on the fact of the definitions of includes, right, the legal definition of including.
[39:45.000 --> 39:55.000]  No, it simply means that if you look at what the definition for a motor vehicle is in the statute, specific to the section he's being charged under.
[39:55.000 --> 40:07.000]  For instance, here in Texas in the transportation code, the definition of motor vehicle is actually defined differently, slightly differently in multiple places.
[40:07.000 --> 40:23.000]  There is the overall general definition in chapter 541, and then there are multiple local definitions in various other chapters, which change it ever so slightly from the general definition in 541.
[40:23.000 --> 40:31.000]  However, here, motorcycle has a separate definition from motor vehicle.
[40:31.000 --> 40:36.000]  They are not one and the same thing.
[40:36.000 --> 41:02.000]  So if the statute he's being charged under specifically says motor vehicle, and the definition of motor vehicle relative to that statute does not include or encompass motorcycles and four-wheelers and scooters and mopeds or anything else of that type, then it cannot be a motor vehicle.
[41:02.000 --> 41:08.000]  Especially if it's got its own separate definition of motorcycle or four-wheeler.
[41:08.000 --> 41:11.000]  And in the same place where there's the definition of a motor vehicle.
[41:11.000 --> 41:14.000]  See what I'm saying?
[41:14.000 --> 41:20.000]  Yeah, I want to say they call this an off-road vehicle.
[41:20.000 --> 41:31.000]  What does the statute say? Does the statute say off-road? And is there a definition of off-road that includes four-wheelers?
[41:31.000 --> 41:37.000]  Well, and that's another question, because originally they were charging him under the DNR code.
[41:37.000 --> 41:47.000]  Now they're completely pulling him out of the DNR statutory realm and going after him with traffic regulation.
[41:47.000 --> 41:56.000]  Okay, then all you have to do is show that the game warden has no legal authority to enforce the traffic regulations and you've got a false arrest scenario.
[41:56.000 --> 42:02.000]  Okay, okay. Excellent.
[42:02.000 --> 42:05.000]  All right, well, anything else?
[42:05.000 --> 42:14.000]  Can you say anything about how the statute, when a statute doesn't match the actual law that originated it?
[42:14.000 --> 42:25.000]  See, I wanted to go after the DNR now for manipulating the statute falsely.
[42:25.000 --> 42:41.000]  Well, what you need to do is file a complaint with the AG's office and with your local legislative representatives outlining exactly how that statute is in violation of the original law
[42:41.000 --> 42:45.000]  and petition to have it corrected.
[42:45.000 --> 42:53.000]  Because that's the administrative agency overstepping its legal authority, which they do a lot.
[42:53.000 --> 43:07.000]  It's how the Department of Public Safety has altered the transportation code to make it appear to apply to things other than commercial vehicles and other motor vehicles engaged in commerce.
[43:07.000 --> 43:08.000]  Right.
[43:08.000 --> 43:18.000]  But when you read the administrative code and the transportation code together, it's absolutely clear that is all it's limited to and all it's ever been limited to.
[43:18.000 --> 43:32.000]  Well, and on a little side note, I was wondering about that, when it comes to filing a RICO lawsuit, does that ever amount to anything?
[43:32.000 --> 43:40.000]  Well, I don't know. I've never been part of a RICO lawsuit against an administrative agency for this, so I can't answer that.
[43:40.000 --> 43:51.000]  The DNR, I mean, they fought all kinds of trucks and stuff like that to engage this new pursuit of these people with the ATVs they got now, you know?
[43:51.000 --> 43:54.000]  Yeah. Well, hang on just a second, Marty. I've got to take another break.
[43:54.000 --> 44:00.000]  All right, folks. We'll be right back after this break. 512-646-1984. Just call.
[44:00.000 --> 44:14.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:33.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.000 --> 44:42.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.000 --> 45:05.000]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[45:05.000 --> 45:11.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos.
[45:11.000 --> 45:14.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[45:14.000 --> 45:21.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[45:21.000 --> 45:23.000]  How can I help logos?
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[45:28.000 --> 45:30.000]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[45:30.000 --> 45:32.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[45:32.000 --> 45:35.000]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[45:35.000 --> 45:38.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[45:44.000 --> 45:45.000]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.000 --> 45:46.000]  No.
[45:46.000 --> 45:48.000]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.000 --> 45:49.000]  No.
[45:49.000 --> 45:50.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[45:50.000 --> 45:51.000]  No.
[45:51.000 --> 45:52.000]  I mean, yes.
[45:52.000 --> 45:58.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. Thank you so much.
[45:58.000 --> 45:59.000]  You're welcome.
[45:59.000 --> 46:23.000]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:23.000 --> 46:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Logos Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:30.000 --> 46:38.000]  It is February 27, 2023. We are live tonight, and I've got still Marty and Minnesota up here.
[46:38.000 --> 46:40.000]  All right, Marty, please continue.
[46:40.000 --> 46:41.000]  What was your question again?
[46:41.000 --> 46:52.000]  I was just to recap what you were saying about going to the Attorney General, you said?
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  Yeah, you got to tell the attorney, here in Texas, if you're going to challenge the
[46:56.000 --> 47:02.000]  constitutionality of a statute, you have to send a specific form to the State Attorney
[47:02.000 --> 47:06.000]  General's office to do that, okay?
[47:06.000 --> 47:12.000]  But here, the AG's office, you can file a complaint within that the administrative agency
[47:12.000 --> 47:18.000]  has attempted to alter the letter of the law via the statute versus the original bill,
[47:18.000 --> 47:24.000]  and make sure you provide them copies with each one showing where the differences are
[47:24.000 --> 47:26.000]  that shouldn't be there.
[47:26.000 --> 47:33.000]  But I would also go with my representative and show the same thing to them and to the
[47:33.000 --> 47:39.000]  administrative agency in question, demanding that they correct this and remove the offending
[47:39.000 --> 47:47.000]  language that violates the jurisdictional limitations set by the enacted law.
[47:47.000 --> 47:49.000]  Okay.
[47:49.000 --> 47:57.000]  Remember, there are jurisdictional and subject matter limitations set by a legislative enactment,
[47:57.000 --> 48:04.000]  and the agency responsible for that enactment cannot exceed that ever, and when they do,
[48:04.000 --> 48:08.000]  we have to go after them for it.
[48:08.000 --> 48:13.000]  Right, and then would that be, is that something that'd be good to include in the filing of
[48:13.000 --> 48:15.000]  this case as well?
[48:15.000 --> 48:20.000]  It's irrelevant to the filing of the case now that you've got them to dismiss the charges
[48:20.000 --> 48:24.000]  under the statute you're complaining about.
[48:24.000 --> 48:31.000]  The question now is them attempting to expand the new statute to encompass an object, i.e.
[48:31.000 --> 48:40.000]  a four-wheeler, that the specific terminology of the statute does not encompass within the
[48:40.000 --> 48:43.000]  meaning of motor vehicle, for instance.
[48:43.000 --> 48:46.000]  Right.
[48:46.000 --> 48:53.000]  And then there's also the fact that if you can show it, that the agency that made the
[48:53.000 --> 49:00.000]  stop and issued the citation had no legitimate legal authority to do so.
[49:00.000 --> 49:08.000]  And thus, they acted outside of their departmental and official capacities and actually conducted
[49:08.000 --> 49:17.000]  themselves illegally in what they did, because when it comes to regulatory schemes, if they're
[49:17.000 --> 49:24.000]  not specifically authorized by statute to do something, then they don't have the legal
[49:24.000 --> 49:27.000]  power to actually do it.
[49:27.000 --> 49:36.000]  That is then acting under the color of law with no lawful authority in support of it.
[49:36.000 --> 49:38.000]  Is that what I'm saying?
[49:38.000 --> 49:40.000]  Yep, absolutely.
[49:40.000 --> 49:46.000]  So, based upon what you're telling me that you think you've got, that to me is the better
[49:46.000 --> 49:47.000]  argument.
[49:47.000 --> 49:53.000]  There was no legitimate legal authority for the stop made by the individual that perpetrated
[49:53.000 --> 50:02.000]  the stop, i.e. your version of a game warden, a department of natural resources retard.
[50:02.000 --> 50:07.000]  I mean officer.
[50:07.000 --> 50:10.000]  Yeah, that sounds about right.
[50:10.000 --> 50:15.000]  Because I mean I had the exact same problem here in Texas when those two game wardens
[50:15.000 --> 50:16.000]  pulled me over.
[50:16.000 --> 50:19.000]  And I told them, what is it you think you're doing?
[50:19.000 --> 50:23.000]  There are no deer legs sticking out of my car window.
[50:23.000 --> 50:27.000]  And then when I went down and talked to the JP that was going to hear my case about it,
[50:27.000 --> 50:31.000]  I said, you realize, of course, that the first thing I'm going to do is challenge the legality
[50:31.000 --> 50:32.000]  of the stop.
[50:32.000 --> 50:34.000]  She goes, well, why is that?
[50:34.000 --> 50:40.000]  I was going, despite them being labeled as peace officers, their authority to enforce
[50:40.000 --> 50:48.000]  traffic is limited to roads inside of actual state parks.
[50:48.000 --> 50:51.000]  They have none on the public roadways.
[50:51.000 --> 50:56.000]  And she thought about it for a second and she goes, I believe that's accurate.
[50:56.000 --> 51:01.000]  And so she said, I will call the county attorney and see what they want to do with this.
[51:01.000 --> 51:06.000]  And I said, well, if you're going to solicit a complaint from them, I'm going to have to
[51:06.000 --> 51:07.000]  object to that.
[51:07.000 --> 51:11.000]  She's going, no, no, no, I'm simply going to bring up these same points and I'm going
[51:11.000 --> 51:14.000]  to ask them what they want to do about it.
[51:14.000 --> 51:21.000]  And I never heard from them again.
[51:21.000 --> 51:25.000]  So it's possible.
[51:25.000 --> 51:29.000]  And so you approached them before trial even, huh?
[51:29.000 --> 51:37.000]  I went to the actual JP because I went down there to file my motion to dismiss.
[51:37.000 --> 51:39.000]  Yeah.
[51:39.000 --> 51:46.000]  So while I was down there at the JP, she actually showed up at the window because she didn't
[51:46.000 --> 51:48.000]  understand what I was there for.
[51:48.000 --> 51:50.000]  And I said, well, here's what I'm here for.
[51:50.000 --> 51:53.000]  And I showed her the citation, which they had to go dig up.
[51:53.000 --> 52:00.000]  They hadn't even gotten to it yet, even though this was the supposed day that I was supposed
[52:00.000 --> 52:01.000]  to have been in there.
[52:01.000 --> 52:03.000]  They hadn't even done anything with it.
[52:03.000 --> 52:06.000]  And he goes, well, we haven't even made a case number for this yet.
[52:06.000 --> 52:09.000]  It's going, well, the thing about it is you shouldn't be making a case number at all.
[52:09.000 --> 52:12.000]  And here's why.
[52:12.000 --> 52:13.000]  And I went through it with them.
[52:13.000 --> 52:20.000]  And then the JP actually came up and she didn't ask me any specifics about the stop, which
[52:20.000 --> 52:25.000]  would have been illegal for her to do because it would have been ex parte for her to do that.
[52:25.000 --> 52:32.000]  But I did have a discussion of jurisdiction with her.
[52:32.000 --> 52:40.000]  And since it was not specifically based upon the facts of the case, that's a discussion
[52:40.000 --> 52:42.000]  we could have.
[52:42.000 --> 52:44.000]  And that's going like, you know.
[52:44.000 --> 52:51.000]  We were working on criminal complaints against the prosecutor and I mean, what's your position
[52:51.000 --> 52:52.000]  on that?
[52:52.000 --> 52:53.000]  We ought to stick with those.
[52:53.000 --> 52:54.000]  Absolutely.
[52:54.000 --> 52:55.000]  I filed 400.
[52:55.000 --> 52:57.000]  I can't remember the exact number anymore.
[52:57.000 --> 53:03.000]  Spence a daggum long, but I filed 400 and I think 70 something against the county attorney
[53:03.000 --> 53:10.000]  in Nacogdoches County for refusing to do her job in accordance with the code of criminal
[53:10.000 --> 53:14.000]  procedure.
[53:14.000 --> 53:22.000]  And I filed a criminal complaint against her on every single count, every last one of them.
[53:22.000 --> 53:27.000]  Do you still, do you still do the, so I remember Randy always taught us to bring those to
[53:27.000 --> 53:29.000]  Clark and to get the judge to accept them.
[53:29.000 --> 53:31.000]  Is that?
[53:31.000 --> 53:35.000]  Well, doesn't do you any good to follow them with the person that's you're complaining
[53:35.000 --> 53:39.000]  against, right?
[53:39.000 --> 53:40.000]  No, absolutely.
[53:40.000 --> 53:45.000]  If you're charging the DA with criminal conduct, you don't want to be trying to file the complaint
[53:45.000 --> 53:47.000]  with the DA's office, do you?
[53:47.000 --> 53:49.000]  No, right.
[53:49.000 --> 53:51.000]  What about bringing them to like the local sheriff?
[53:51.000 --> 53:52.000]  That's probably even.
[53:52.000 --> 53:58.000]  Sheriff can't act on the criminal complaint.
[53:58.000 --> 54:04.000]  So back, we're talking then back again to the attorney general's office.
[54:04.000 --> 54:05.000]  Okay.
[54:05.000 --> 54:06.000]  No.
[54:06.000 --> 54:14.000]  We're talking back to a judge, to an actual district judge, and you file the criminal
[54:14.000 --> 54:17.000]  complaints with them.
[54:17.000 --> 54:21.000]  In the county that we are.
[54:21.000 --> 54:26.000]  I don't, I don't know what your state constitution says, but here in Texas, it doesn't have to
[54:26.000 --> 54:31.000]  be in the same county because the judge can send it to the proper grand jury of the proper
[54:31.000 --> 54:35.000]  county from wherever he is.
[54:35.000 --> 54:42.000]  The Texas constitution does not limit the grand jury's jurisdiction based upon area.
[54:42.000 --> 54:49.000]  It doesn't limit where the person filing the complaint can actually be.
[54:49.000 --> 54:54.000]  So it doesn't matter whether the offense occurred in a county where I live or not.
[54:54.000 --> 54:59.000]  If I have reason to believe a crime has occurred anywhere within the state of Texas, I can
[54:59.000 --> 55:05.000]  file a complaint with my nearest grand jury, my nearest district attorney, or my nearest district
[55:05.000 --> 55:06.000]  judge.
[55:06.000 --> 55:12.000]  And by law in Texas, they're required to take it.
[55:12.000 --> 55:13.000]  Okay.
[55:13.000 --> 55:18.000]  Well, I'll stick with those then too.
[55:18.000 --> 55:23.000]  And I just wonder if there wasn't, you know, conflict of interest serving in the same district
[55:23.000 --> 55:27.000]  that you are against the people in your district.
[55:27.000 --> 55:32.000]  Well, only if you're trying to serve it with the same entity you're accusing of having
[55:32.000 --> 55:34.000]  committed the act.
[55:34.000 --> 55:35.000]  Right.
[55:35.000 --> 55:36.000]  Right.
[55:36.000 --> 55:37.000]  Which is common sense.
[55:37.000 --> 55:38.000]  All right.
[55:38.000 --> 55:44.000]  Well, you come up with anything else that I'm missing maybe or you figure we're on a good
[55:44.000 --> 55:45.000]  track here.
[55:45.000 --> 55:49.000]  Well, based upon what you told me, as long as you've got the information you think you
[55:49.000 --> 55:54.000]  have and it's accurate and you can make the argument with it, then I think you've covered
[55:54.000 --> 56:01.000]  the ones you need, which is that there was no jurisdiction invested in the DNR agent
[56:01.000 --> 56:03.800]  to do what he did.
[56:03.800 --> 56:08.000]  And therefore everything he did, including what was discovered and charged after the
[56:08.000 --> 56:11.560]  fact is fruit of the poison tree in it, missable.
[56:11.560 --> 56:17.840]  And therefore you want to dismiss with prejudice.
[56:17.840 --> 56:22.600]  And that way you see, if you get it dismissed with prejudice, they can't bring it back again.
[56:22.600 --> 56:24.600]  And it would be double jeopardy.
[56:24.600 --> 56:32.240]  Well, and like I tell them here, I said, we don't expect to win on the trial level anyway.
[56:32.240 --> 56:37.600]  We expect to win on appeal because that seems to be the status quo here in this state.
[56:37.600 --> 56:40.040]  Well, that's the status quo pretty much everywhere.
[56:40.040 --> 56:46.200]  The kangaroo courts could care less what the law is if they even know what it is.
[56:46.200 --> 56:48.700]  Right.
[56:48.700 --> 56:54.200]  That is why everything you do is set up for making a record for the purpose of appeal.
[56:54.200 --> 56:57.400]  All right, sounds good.
[56:57.400 --> 56:58.400]  Okay.
[56:58.400 --> 56:59.400]  All right, Eddie.
[56:59.400 --> 57:00.400]  Thank you very much.
[57:00.400 --> 57:01.400]  All right, Marty.
[57:01.400 --> 57:02.400]  Thanks for calling in.
[57:02.400 --> 57:03.400]  All right, folks.
[57:03.400 --> 57:04.400]  Again, call in number 512-646-1984.
[57:04.400 --> 57:13.400]  If you want to call and get in line right now, I've got Mike in Arizona up next.
[57:13.400 --> 57:15.000]  Mike, what can we do for you?
[57:15.000 --> 57:16.560]  And I got a minute and a half to break.
[57:16.560 --> 57:20.480]  So in about a minute, I want to cut you off and take a break, and then we'll get back
[57:20.480 --> 57:21.480]  with you.
[57:21.480 --> 57:22.480]  Okay?
[57:22.480 --> 57:23.480]  All right.
[57:23.480 --> 57:28.560]  Basically, I was just hoping I could get a little bit of clarification between the difference
[57:28.560 --> 57:33.560]  between the unenrolled bill and the session law.
[57:33.560 --> 57:36.520]  Well, it depends.
[57:36.520 --> 57:43.360]  But here in Texas, the enrolled bill is what has actually been signed by the chairman of
[57:43.360 --> 57:48.600]  each house of the legislature and the governor to be fully enacted into law.
[57:48.600 --> 57:54.840]  The session law is the bill as it's progressing through the houses before it gets signed into
[57:54.840 --> 57:56.840]  law by the governor.
[57:56.840 --> 57:57.840]  Okay.
[57:57.840 --> 58:07.320]  Yeah, I've been going through the, I'm trying to take the transportation code back to the
[58:07.320 --> 58:08.840]  first enactment I can find.
[58:08.840 --> 58:14.960]  I'm at the first legislative session, first legislative, first special session is when
[58:14.960 --> 58:15.960]  I can find it.
[58:15.960 --> 58:18.360]  Well, I can help you out.
[58:18.360 --> 58:24.360]  The entire Texas transportation code is based upon the original laws that exist in 1925.
[58:24.360 --> 58:30.200]  The 1925 enactments are the original laws that everything currently in the transportation
[58:30.200 --> 58:35.920]  code is based on.
[58:35.920 --> 58:55.440]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.440 --> 58:58.240]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.240 --> 59:03.640]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.640 --> 59:06.880]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.880 --> 59:08.720]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.720 --> 59:14.580]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.580 --> 59:18.320]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.320 --> 59:23.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.280 --> 59:28.000]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.160 --> 59:43.560]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.560 --> 59:47.640]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.640 --> 59:49.640]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.640 --> 01:00:00.680]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.680 --> 01:00:04.360]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:04.360 --> 01:00:07.800]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:07.800 --> 01:00:09.280]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:09.280 --> 01:00:13.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:13.200 --> 01:00:16.320]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:16.320 --> 01:00:17.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:17.920 --> 01:00:21.520]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:21.520 --> 01:00:26.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:26.280 --> 01:00:31.360]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:31.360 --> 01:00:34.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:34.040 --> 01:00:38.360]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:00:38.360 --> 01:00:41.880]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:41.880 --> 01:00:45.440]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.440 --> 01:00:49.800]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[01:00:49.800 --> 01:00:51.840]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:56.200]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms.
[01:00:56.200 --> 01:01:00.240]  The arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:01:00.240 --> 01:01:01.240]  Get it?
[01:01:01.240 --> 01:01:02.240]  Two arms?
[01:01:02.240 --> 01:01:03.240]  Bear hug?
[01:01:03.240 --> 01:01:04.240]  Bear arms?
[01:01:04.240 --> 01:01:07.200]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[01:01:07.200 --> 01:01:11.960]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against
[01:01:11.960 --> 01:01:17.080]  arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America,
[01:01:17.080 --> 01:01:20.280]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:01:20.280 --> 01:01:33.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:37.560]  You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but new research shows that as brains
[01:01:37.560 --> 01:01:40.280]  get older, they actually work more efficiently.
[01:01:40.280 --> 01:01:45.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper
[01:01:45.480 --> 01:01:47.240]  after this.
[01:01:47.240 --> 01:01:48.960]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:48.960 --> 01:01:52.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.560 --> 01:01:57.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.560 --> 01:01:59.080]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:59.080 --> 01:02:02.680]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.680 --> 01:02:05.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:02:05.320 --> 01:02:10.920]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:02:10.920 --> 01:02:12.680]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.680 --> 01:02:16.280]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.280 --> 01:02:20.800]  It's a widely held notion that the older people get, the more doddering they become.
[01:02:20.800 --> 01:02:26.520]  But new research shows that even as our brains age, they can actually become more efficient.
[01:02:26.520 --> 01:02:33.480]  Scientists ask two groups of volunteers, one age 18 to 35 and the other 55 to 75, to associate
[01:02:33.480 --> 01:02:35.760]  different words with given topics.
[01:02:35.760 --> 01:02:38.880]  At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake.
[01:02:38.880 --> 01:02:43.520]  When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus, but the older group's
[01:02:43.520 --> 01:02:48.160]  brains didn't even flinch and they stayed focused on solving the next task.
[01:02:48.160 --> 01:02:49.160]  The moral?
[01:02:49.160 --> 01:02:51.160]  There's something to be said for experience.
[01:02:51.160 --> 01:03:20.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:20.160 --> 01:03:42.880]  All right, we are back.
[01:03:42.880 --> 01:03:44.280]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:03:44.280 --> 01:03:45.280]  I apologize.
[01:03:45.280 --> 01:03:49.280]  I misspoke the phone number on the way out of want to go 512-646-1980.
[01:03:49.280 --> 01:03:50.280]  Not 24.
[01:03:50.280 --> 01:03:51.280]  My apologies.
[01:03:51.280 --> 01:03:56.640]  The first time I think I've ever done that, but I was trying to read the screen to make
[01:03:56.640 --> 01:04:01.080]  sure I had everything done and solve the number two and set it rather than just looked over
[01:04:01.080 --> 01:04:02.080]  it.
[01:04:02.080 --> 01:04:04.320]  But in any case, that's the correct phone number.
[01:04:04.320 --> 01:04:09.760]  It is February 27th of 2023.
[01:04:09.760 --> 01:04:13.360]  We are live tonight and we are currently talking to Mike in Arizona.
[01:04:13.360 --> 01:04:16.960]  All right, Mike, what else do you got on that question?
[01:04:16.960 --> 01:04:25.840]  Okay, so basically what I've got back to at this point is the first legislature, first
[01:04:25.840 --> 01:04:32.280]  special session is the first time I can find anything regarding regulation of motor vehicles.
[01:04:32.280 --> 01:04:34.720]  And what year was that?
[01:04:34.720 --> 01:04:35.720]  1912.
[01:04:35.720 --> 01:04:36.720]  Okay.
[01:04:36.720 --> 01:04:41.640]  And I got up to around 1925.
[01:04:41.640 --> 01:04:42.640]  I apologize.
[01:04:42.640 --> 01:04:44.160]  I don't have it in front of me.
[01:04:44.160 --> 01:04:49.480]  What I apologize in 1922 is when the federal government instituted a nationwide driver's
[01:04:49.480 --> 01:04:54.800]  license scheme that the states adopted and made current into their statutes, right?
[01:04:54.800 --> 01:04:55.800]  Yes.
[01:04:55.800 --> 01:04:59.720]  And that's just what I was going to get to because once you get up to about, I think
[01:04:59.720 --> 01:05:07.600]  it was 1920 or 1921 that everything they had done regarding regulation of motor vehicles
[01:05:07.600 --> 01:05:08.960]  was repealed.
[01:05:08.960 --> 01:05:15.880]  And then that's around, again, I apologize, but around 1921 to 1925, there's the first
[01:05:15.880 --> 01:05:21.720]  mention of the motor vehicle or transportation code and the setting law.
[01:05:21.720 --> 01:05:28.920]  And that's because Harry S. Truman got a bill enacted at that time in the 1922 that had
[01:05:28.920 --> 01:05:30.720]  to do with driver's licensing.
[01:05:30.720 --> 01:05:36.040]  And that is what started the snowball that now has all the states trying to extort money
[01:05:36.040 --> 01:05:40.840]  from everybody instead of just the limited class of persons who are regulated by those
[01:05:40.840 --> 01:05:43.840]  statutes.
[01:05:43.840 --> 01:05:51.640]  In Texas, prior to 1922, was there anything regarding regulation of motor vehicles that
[01:05:51.640 --> 01:05:52.640]  you found?
[01:05:52.640 --> 01:05:53.640]  Yes, there was.
[01:05:53.640 --> 01:05:58.960]  The first driver's license law was enacted in 1915, but it was limited strictly to commercial
[01:05:58.960 --> 01:06:00.760]  used vehicles.
[01:06:00.760 --> 01:06:02.760]  Okay.
[01:06:02.760 --> 01:06:08.560]  It's interesting because what I found in, or at least here in 1912, it's, unfortunately,
[01:06:08.560 --> 01:06:12.000]  it's not the first mention of licensure.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:16.640]  It's involving the way it's written, it appears to me that they're basically, they're assessing
[01:06:16.640 --> 01:06:18.760]  attacks and they're giving out.
[01:06:18.760 --> 01:06:19.760]  Exactly.
[01:06:19.760 --> 01:06:20.760]  And see, that's the thing.
[01:06:20.760 --> 01:06:23.680]  That's what most people don't understand about a license.
[01:06:23.680 --> 01:06:27.440]  Do you know what the legal definition of a license is?
[01:06:27.440 --> 01:06:29.000]  A tax.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:30.400]  No, no, no.
[01:06:30.400 --> 01:06:34.600]  You know what the actual legal definition of a license is?
[01:06:34.600 --> 01:06:40.520]  I'll go ahead and let you state it because I'm probably going to get it wrong.
[01:06:40.520 --> 01:06:46.200]  Permission to do that, which would be otherwise illegal without the license.
[01:06:46.200 --> 01:06:49.760]  The key word there is permission.
[01:06:49.760 --> 01:06:58.360]  Well, if you're engaged in a right, then you don't need anyone's permission, do you?
[01:06:58.360 --> 01:06:59.360]  No.
[01:06:59.360 --> 01:07:05.000]  So, what can they license that requires permission?
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:08.480]  If it's not a right, what must it be?
[01:07:08.480 --> 01:07:09.480]  Privilege.
[01:07:09.480 --> 01:07:10.980]  Bingo.
[01:07:10.980 --> 01:07:15.080]  So they can only licensed privileged activities.
[01:07:15.080 --> 01:07:24.040]  Now, given that the roads belong to the people, okay, we pay for them, they're ours.
[01:07:24.040 --> 01:07:29.800]  For private personal use is the entire reason they exist.
[01:07:29.800 --> 01:07:38.240]  The United States Supreme Court said that it is the use of those roads for commerce that
[01:07:38.240 --> 01:07:48.080]  is the extraordinary use over which the states and the federal government may apply regulation.
[01:07:48.080 --> 01:07:55.120]  So that extraordinary use is the privileged use that they can license and regulate.
[01:07:55.120 --> 01:07:58.560]  In fact, here in Texas, and I'll give you another thing to look at.
[01:07:58.560 --> 01:08:00.560]  Don't just look at the statutes.
[01:08:00.560 --> 01:08:05.720]  Also look at your state administrative code and your state police department that regulates
[01:08:05.720 --> 01:08:06.840]  most of the programs.
[01:08:06.840 --> 01:08:13.840]  I guarantee you your DPS regulates driver's licensing, financial responsibility, meaning
[01:08:13.840 --> 01:08:17.920]  car insurance and most likely motor vehicle inspection.
[01:08:17.920 --> 01:08:20.560]  At a minimum, they regulate those three things.
[01:08:20.560 --> 01:08:22.840]  I'd almost guarantee you they do.
[01:08:22.840 --> 01:08:23.840]  Am I right?
[01:08:23.840 --> 01:08:24.840]  Yes.
[01:08:24.840 --> 01:08:25.840]  Okay.
[01:08:25.840 --> 01:08:33.080]  In the administrative code, it will tell you exactly what their authority is as an agency
[01:08:33.080 --> 01:08:37.720]  because if they're in the administrative code for your state, they are a state administrative
[01:08:37.720 --> 01:08:40.840]  agency, period.
[01:08:40.840 --> 01:08:46.640]  So not only does the administrative code say what their organization and authority is,
[01:08:46.640 --> 01:08:52.320]  it will also contain a list of the programs they are legally authorized to implement and
[01:08:52.320 --> 01:08:54.640]  maintain.
[01:08:54.640 --> 01:09:02.380]  And here in Texas, rule 1.1 tells you very clearly that all regulatory programs given
[01:09:02.380 --> 01:09:10.000]  over to the authority of the DPS are there to regulate one thing and one thing only,
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.640]  control and for hire traffic.
[01:09:12.640 --> 01:09:18.360]  And then it gives you a list of what those programs are, driver's licensing, public
[01:09:18.360 --> 01:09:24.480]  safety and information, which is the financial responsibility slash insurance and commercial
[01:09:24.480 --> 01:09:30.960]  motor vehicle inspection, emphasis on commercial, okay?
[01:09:30.960 --> 01:09:36.400]  Here in Texas, there's only one chapter of the transportation code dedicated to motor
[01:09:36.400 --> 01:09:43.200]  vehicle inspections and it is specifically titled commercial motor vehicle inspection.
[01:09:43.200 --> 01:09:50.720]  And a commercial motor vehicle is a specific weight class or hazardous materials carrying
[01:09:50.720 --> 01:09:58.600]  class or passenger capacity class that is different than other commercial use vehicles
[01:09:58.600 --> 01:10:03.600]  that are not under the definition of commercial motor vehicle because they don't fit within
[01:10:03.600 --> 01:10:05.760]  those three classes.
[01:10:05.760 --> 01:10:11.200]  They're lesser like a taxi cab or a shuttle bus or delivery driver that's not hauling
[01:10:11.200 --> 01:10:16.160]  an 18-wheeler or something of that nature.
[01:10:16.160 --> 01:10:18.160]  You follow what I'm saying?
[01:10:18.160 --> 01:10:19.680]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:10:19.680 --> 01:10:26.040]  Okay, so based upon that, the fact that the programs themselves are specifically limited
[01:10:26.040 --> 01:10:33.000]  to the same mission the Department of Public Safety has, that is the privilege being part
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:39.720]  of commercial and for hire traffic that is being licensed and regulated, period.
[01:10:39.720 --> 01:10:47.440]  And see here in Texas, we can get to the registration requirement because you have to meet at least
[01:10:47.440 --> 01:10:53.680]  two of those program requirements that are commercial or for hire in order to register
[01:10:53.680 --> 01:10:54.680]  a car.
[01:10:54.680 --> 01:10:57.200]  For instance, it has to be inspected.
[01:10:57.200 --> 01:11:02.240]  Well, Texas law says that only commercial motor vehicles are required to be inspected.
[01:11:02.240 --> 01:11:06.920]  Hence, if you're required to inspect it, then you are declaring it to be a commercial
[01:11:06.920 --> 01:11:12.440]  motor vehicle, which in fact your private car is not, okay?
[01:11:12.440 --> 01:11:19.360]  It also must have insurance, i.e. financial responsibility, i.e. the Department of the
[01:11:19.360 --> 01:11:26.720]  Public Safety aspect of how the financial safety, whatever.
[01:11:26.720 --> 01:11:32.720]  But the fact is, is that that insurance requirement once again applies to commercial motor vehicles
[01:11:32.720 --> 01:11:38.040]  because the DPS is only allowed to apply the regulatory programs to commercial and for
[01:11:38.040 --> 01:11:39.040]  hire traffic.
[01:11:39.040 --> 01:11:44.640]  Hence, commercial motor vehicles and those used in commerce are the only ones required
[01:11:44.640 --> 01:11:46.920]  to be insured.
[01:11:46.920 --> 01:11:54.320]  However, taxi cabs and things of that nature cannot be required to be registered if they
[01:11:54.320 --> 01:12:01.560]  are required to be inspected because they do not fall within the category known as commercial
[01:12:01.560 --> 01:12:03.480]  motor vehicle.
[01:12:03.480 --> 01:12:07.400]  They don't fit the weight class, they don't fit the passenger capacity class, and they
[01:12:07.400 --> 01:12:11.600]  don't bear hazardous materials or hazardous materials placards.
[01:12:11.600 --> 01:12:18.000]  So taxi cabs, shuttle buses, delivery drivers, things like that can't be required to register
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:24.240]  their cars under the registration statute anyway because they don't, they can't meet
[01:12:24.240 --> 01:12:29.360]  the second requirement, which is commercial motor vehicle inspection.
[01:12:29.360 --> 01:12:35.600]  So, you have to connect all of those dots to get the whole picture.
[01:12:35.600 --> 01:12:44.600]  Yeah, that's why I figured I'd start at the beginning and work forward kind of was my...
[01:12:44.600 --> 01:12:52.440]  Well, let me give you a clue, don't ever start with the regulatory statutes.
[01:12:52.440 --> 01:12:57.080]  Start with the agency given authority over those statutes.
[01:12:57.080 --> 01:13:00.960]  First you find out what their authority actually is.
[01:13:00.960 --> 01:13:07.320]  Find out what their actual lawful legal responsibilities and powers are.
[01:13:07.320 --> 01:13:13.120]  Then, when you read the statutes, you're reading it within the context of the authority they
[01:13:13.120 --> 01:13:18.160]  actually have instead of the one they want you to believe they've got and suddenly the
[01:13:18.160 --> 01:13:23.160]  statutes make a whole lot more sense.
[01:13:23.160 --> 01:13:26.160]  Okay, cool.
[01:13:26.160 --> 01:13:32.360]  Yeah, I've just been messing with it for a while and I kind of have time reasonably
[01:13:32.360 --> 01:13:39.760]  to sit down and get after it and seeing some things that are pretty glaring it actually...
[01:13:39.760 --> 01:13:46.040]  Even back in 1912, it mentions when there's a motor vehicle is sold that the seller has
[01:13:46.040 --> 01:13:53.480]  to list the name, address, and the business address of who they're selling it to and list
[01:13:53.480 --> 01:13:56.600]  the trade name, so I thought that would be...
[01:13:56.600 --> 01:13:59.480]  Exactly, and that's exactly what a motor vehicle is.
[01:13:59.480 --> 01:14:08.400]  It's one that's used to engage in a commercial aspect use of the highways.
[01:14:08.400 --> 01:14:10.520]  Yeah.
[01:14:10.520 --> 01:14:15.400]  And it's like I told my previous caller when we were talking about how their version of
[01:14:15.400 --> 01:14:24.680]  a game warden, their DNR agent, does not have legal authority to enforce the actual transportation
[01:14:24.680 --> 01:14:31.640]  statutes on the public roads only within the state parks, okay?
[01:14:31.640 --> 01:14:34.000]  That is looking at the agency first.
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:35.160]  What is their authority?
[01:14:35.160 --> 01:14:39.560]  Well, their authority specifically is limited to state parks.
[01:14:39.560 --> 01:14:43.840]  So, how are they acting outside of the park on a public highway?
[01:14:43.840 --> 01:14:51.480]  Well, they're not, not legally, not legitimately, well, that's how you find out that they're
[01:14:51.480 --> 01:14:53.840]  acting outside of their legal authority.
[01:14:53.840 --> 01:15:00.680]  That's, I mean, I'll be like, you guys have talked about how in Texas that only DPS is
[01:15:00.680 --> 01:15:04.920]  authorized to enforce the transportation code in like local...
[01:15:04.920 --> 01:15:10.160]  If you read the individual statutes that cover each of these programs I listed off, the three
[01:15:10.160 --> 01:15:15.920]  that are specifically listed here in Texas, that's exactly right because inside of each
[01:15:15.920 --> 01:15:22.200]  chapter governing each of those programs, it specifically defines the term department.
[01:15:22.200 --> 01:15:28.040]  And then everywhere where it mentions an officer, it mentions one of two.
[01:15:28.040 --> 01:15:34.360]  It either says peace officer, which by definition and the way it's used in the statute, must
[01:15:34.360 --> 01:15:40.640]  fall within the context of department, which is Department of Public Safety, which means
[01:15:40.640 --> 01:15:48.960]  their officers and their officers only, or it says police officer, which has a separate
[01:15:48.960 --> 01:15:56.600]  definition from peace officer, as is defined in 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:15:56.600 --> 01:16:02.600]  Police officers actually separately defined under chapter 541 of our transportation code
[01:16:02.600 --> 01:16:09.720]  as someone who has been authorized to enforce the traffic laws and to make arrests for those
[01:16:09.720 --> 01:16:12.680]  violations.
[01:16:12.680 --> 01:16:20.320]  So right there, the police officer is someone that must have been certified and given authority
[01:16:20.320 --> 01:16:21.800]  to do what they do.
[01:16:21.800 --> 01:16:30.560]  And the administrative code is what tells us how that happens under rule 4.13, in which
[01:16:30.560 --> 01:16:37.640]  case the local officers that actually do get certified are limited 100% to enforcement
[01:16:37.640 --> 01:16:41.920]  against commercial and poor hire traffic.
[01:16:41.920 --> 01:16:47.360]  And then only commercial motor vehicles because that's the only actual chapter that gives
[01:16:47.360 --> 01:16:50.880]  those officers any authority at the local level to enforce.
[01:16:50.880 --> 01:16:55.840]  All right, got another break to take, hang on and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:55.840 --> 01:17:00.840]  All right folks, we'll be right back after the break, y'all hang on.
[01:17:00.840 --> 01:17:05.120]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[01:17:05.120 --> 01:17:06.120]  Word?
[01:17:06.120 --> 01:17:11.360]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[01:17:11.360 --> 01:17:17.760]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:17.760 --> 01:17:22.280]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[01:17:22.280 --> 01:17:24.680]  dividing the Word of Truth.
[01:17:24.680 --> 01:17:28.680]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[01:17:28.680 --> 01:17:31.960]  by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[01:17:31.960 --> 01:17:36.600]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[01:17:36.600 --> 01:17:38.960]  and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.960 --> 01:17:43.520]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.520 --> 01:17:47.800]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[01:17:47.800 --> 01:17:50.080]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:50.080 --> 01:17:56.520]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire
[01:17:56.520 --> 01:18:00.520]  and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:05.640]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.640 --> 01:18:09.320]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.320 --> 01:18:13.600]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:18:13.600 --> 01:18:14.600]  can win two.
[01:18:14.600 --> 01:18:19.440]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:18:19.440 --> 01:18:25.200]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:18:25.200 --> 01:18:29.840]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:18:29.840 --> 01:18:34.040]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.040 --> 01:18:39.160]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.160 --> 01:18:41.160]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.160 --> 01:18:46.840]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner
[01:18:46.840 --> 01:18:49.800]  or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.800 --> 01:18:57.560]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.560 --> 01:19:25.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, as I walk through the valley of the shadow
[01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:30.440]  of the sun, I take a look at my life and realize there's nothing left, cause I've been blasting
[01:19:30.440 --> 01:19:34.400]  and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is a-
[01:19:34.400 --> 01:19:36.240]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:36.240 --> 01:19:40.080]  This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:40.080 --> 01:19:46.480]  If you want to call and talk, we are live tonight, February 27th, 2023.
[01:19:46.480 --> 01:19:50.280]  I am here if you are out there and listening.
[01:19:50.280 --> 01:19:52.560]  That said, let's get back to Mike in Arizona.
[01:19:52.560 --> 01:19:56.880]  Alright, I know I've thrown a lot at you, but John, do you understand what I'm trying
[01:19:56.880 --> 01:19:57.880]  to say about you?
[01:19:57.880 --> 01:20:02.680]  You've got to look at more than one thing and you always, always want to start with
[01:20:02.680 --> 01:20:03.680]  the agency itself.
[01:20:03.680 --> 01:20:09.120]  Yeah, I mean, I've been listening to you guys for a number of years, it's just I haven't
[01:20:09.120 --> 01:20:11.880]  got down to it till recently.
[01:20:11.880 --> 01:20:15.680]  So, trying to make heads and tails of this and get a good-
[01:20:15.680 --> 01:20:21.080]  Well, I'm trying to save you a lot of wasted time by going the backwards route of getting
[01:20:21.080 --> 01:20:24.160]  to where you want to go because that's how I had to get here.
[01:20:24.160 --> 01:20:28.760]  I had to dig backwards until I found the things that made everything make sense and then I
[01:20:28.760 --> 01:20:32.600]  realized if I had just done it in a different order, it would have come to light a whole
[01:20:32.600 --> 01:20:34.920]  lot faster.
[01:20:34.920 --> 01:20:40.760]  And I realized then and there that starting with the actual authority of any given agency
[01:20:40.760 --> 01:20:46.520]  is what you've got to do if you want to learn what you need to learn in the least amount
[01:20:46.520 --> 01:20:48.520]  of time possible.
[01:20:48.520 --> 01:20:53.960]  Okay, cool.
[01:20:53.960 --> 01:20:57.120]  If I have it, could I ask you one more thing?
[01:20:57.120 --> 01:20:58.120]  Sure.
[01:20:58.120 --> 01:20:59.120]  Have you-
[01:20:59.120 --> 01:21:02.640]  You're the only caller I got on the board right now, Mike, so if you've got questions,
[01:21:02.640 --> 01:21:03.640]  let's talk.
[01:21:03.640 --> 01:21:04.640]  Right on.
[01:21:04.640 --> 01:21:08.960]  Well, have you ever done what you've done with the motor vehicle code with looking up
[01:21:08.960 --> 01:21:14.080]  contractors, licensing, or other types of occupational licensing and tech?
[01:21:14.080 --> 01:21:17.120]  I've used what I've used for lots of things.
[01:21:17.120 --> 01:21:22.240]  Cost tax code, social security, income taxes.
[01:21:22.240 --> 01:21:30.240]  I've looked at all the various laws using the skillset I've developed doing these laws.
[01:21:30.240 --> 01:21:35.840]  Yeah, I'm quite familiar with the income tax myself.
[01:21:35.840 --> 01:21:39.040]  Including banking laws for that matter, where they try to force you to have a social security
[01:21:39.040 --> 01:21:43.880]  number to open up a bank account, that's also a violation of law.
[01:21:43.880 --> 01:21:48.240]  The embedded W-9 and the signature card.
[01:21:48.240 --> 01:21:49.240]  That too.
[01:21:49.240 --> 01:21:55.880]  Actually, that is our fault for not understanding the purpose of the form better.
[01:21:55.880 --> 01:22:00.800]  We don't fill out W-4s, we don't fill out W-9s, we don't do 1099s, because those forms
[01:22:00.800 --> 01:22:04.200]  were never intended for us as Americans.
[01:22:04.200 --> 01:22:05.200]  Yep.
[01:22:05.200 --> 01:22:08.920]  Yeah, I've just, I've been-
[01:22:08.920 --> 01:22:17.080]  In fact, the only form listed by the OMB for American citizens is form 2555.
[01:22:17.080 --> 01:22:22.160]  And you know what it's for?
[01:22:22.160 --> 01:22:23.160]  I am not sure.
[01:22:23.160 --> 01:22:24.160]  I would-
[01:22:24.160 --> 01:22:25.160]  Overseas income.
[01:22:25.160 --> 01:22:26.160]  Yeah.
[01:22:26.160 --> 01:22:32.440]  Foreign persons, foreign corporations, U.S. citizens with-
[01:22:32.440 --> 01:22:33.440]  No, no, no.
[01:22:33.440 --> 01:22:39.400]  For Americans who are earning money outside of the United States.
[01:22:39.400 --> 01:22:44.600]  That's all 2555 is about, reporting income earned outside of the United States and it
[01:22:44.600 --> 01:22:51.360]  is the only one that is specifically identified as being required to be filled out by Americans
[01:22:51.360 --> 01:22:57.280]  who are living outside the U.S. and trying to bring money back into the U.S., or at least
[01:22:57.280 --> 01:23:02.160]  working outside of the U.S. and bringing that money back into the U.S.
[01:23:02.160 --> 01:23:03.160]  Yeah.
[01:23:03.160 --> 01:23:08.760]  Well, the one I was particularly interested in why I asked is with contractors licensing,
[01:23:08.760 --> 01:23:17.200]  at least here in Arizona, they make it appear that if you want to basically engage in private
[01:23:17.200 --> 01:23:21.280]  contract with another private person, they want to pay you something, let's say to build
[01:23:21.280 --> 01:23:26.680]  a deck or something on their home, and the price of that's going to be over $1,000,
[01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:31.840]  they seem to say that they can require you to obtain a license to do so.
[01:23:31.840 --> 01:23:34.880]  I mean, I don't see how they can interfere in your private.
[01:23:34.880 --> 01:23:40.040]  Well, the thing is, is they're not requiring you as the property owner to get it.
[01:23:40.040 --> 01:23:44.160]  They're requiring the person selling their service as a contractor to get it.
[01:23:44.160 --> 01:23:46.200]  No, that's what I mean.
[01:23:46.200 --> 01:23:48.280]  I'm speaking up to this as somebody-
[01:23:48.280 --> 01:23:53.220]  Well, the thing about it is, is you have to understand how, remember we talked about
[01:23:53.220 --> 01:23:57.320]  licensing a privilege, okay?
[01:23:57.320 --> 01:24:02.360]  Now let's analyze the type of stuff we're talking about here.
[01:24:02.360 --> 01:24:11.840]  Someone who builds parts of a dwelling or skyscraper or anything in which the public
[01:24:11.840 --> 01:24:20.920]  must enter and live in or occupy in any fashion has to meet a certain level of public safety
[01:24:20.920 --> 01:24:22.320]  requirements.
[01:24:22.320 --> 01:24:30.080]  Or it can be declared, you know, something has to be destroyed because it's unsafe,
[01:24:30.080 --> 01:24:31.080]  right?
[01:24:31.080 --> 01:24:32.080]  Yeah.
[01:24:32.080 --> 01:24:33.080]  Okay.
[01:24:33.080 --> 01:24:42.080]  So to engage in a business that directly impacts public safety and health is a privileged
[01:24:42.080 --> 01:24:43.080]  occupation.
[01:24:43.080 --> 01:24:45.800]  You got it?
[01:24:45.800 --> 01:24:48.040]  That's why doctors have to be licensed.
[01:24:48.040 --> 01:24:50.440]  That's why psychiatrists have to be licensed.
[01:24:50.440 --> 01:24:58.720]  That's why lawyers have to be licensed, even though they're not actually licensed, okay?
[01:24:58.720 --> 01:25:01.560]  Because they have a direct impact on the public health and welfare.
[01:25:01.560 --> 01:25:08.160]  Well, the same thing goes for developers and contractors that build on buildings and dwellings,
[01:25:08.160 --> 01:25:09.800]  okay?
[01:25:09.800 --> 01:25:15.920]  So when you say that they're interfering with a private contract, that's not exactly true
[01:25:15.920 --> 01:25:25.440]  because you're contracting with an entity that is regulated properly as an entity exercising
[01:25:25.440 --> 01:25:31.920]  a privileged occupation that has a direct impact on the public health and welfare.
[01:25:31.920 --> 01:25:37.200]  Therefore they must be licensed by the state to do what they're doing.
[01:25:37.200 --> 01:25:41.600]  So the state makes them purchase permits to perform.
[01:25:41.600 --> 01:25:44.000]  It's basically amounts to a kickback.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:46.120]  Yeah, I get that.
[01:25:46.120 --> 01:25:52.000]  But the state is actually forcing them to buy the permit to perform the work so that
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:57.660]  the state then has a legitimate reason for showing up to inspect it.
[01:25:57.660 --> 01:26:04.240]  So basically the permit fees are there to supposedly cover the expenses of sending people
[01:26:04.240 --> 01:26:09.840]  out to perform the proper inspections to ensure the person you're paying is doing their job
[01:26:09.840 --> 01:26:13.360]  in compliance with the public health and welfare and the laws of the state.
[01:26:13.360 --> 01:26:14.360]  You got it?
[01:26:14.360 --> 01:26:15.360]  Yes.
[01:26:15.360 --> 01:26:23.640]  To the point that I had looked into it though, I felt that there was a similar issue too.
[01:26:23.640 --> 01:26:26.920]  There is like with the motor vehicle code that the average person looking to see that.
[01:26:26.920 --> 01:26:31.880]  Well, there is because they're also telling private homeowners that if you try to build
[01:26:31.880 --> 01:26:37.560]  onto your house, you have to have a permit and that is a blatant lie.
[01:26:37.560 --> 01:26:42.720]  Well, I was coming at it from the end that I don't know if you're familiar with the
[01:26:42.720 --> 01:26:44.920]  original intent website.
[01:26:44.920 --> 01:26:48.440]  I believe Dave Champion was involved with this or if it's...
[01:26:48.440 --> 01:26:49.440]  Yes, I am.
[01:26:49.440 --> 01:26:52.960]  He got an article on there that mentions, and he mentioned contractor's licensing and
[01:26:52.960 --> 01:26:58.520]  basically it's, I'm going to long story short, he seems to say that if you get back into
[01:26:58.520 --> 01:27:05.640]  the legislative intent of it, it has to do with when you're building on property that's
[01:27:05.640 --> 01:27:12.040]  open to the public or working on government buildings or things of that nature.
[01:27:12.040 --> 01:27:17.480]  And for the most part, that's exactly right.
[01:27:17.480 --> 01:27:22.880]  But if you, but again, that's the difference between you working on your own property which
[01:27:22.880 --> 01:27:28.480]  they cannot force you to get a permit for versus hiring a third party to do it, someone
[01:27:28.480 --> 01:27:31.000]  who could get sued for it.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  You understand?
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:37.440]  If they didn't do it correctly.
[01:27:37.440 --> 01:27:44.720]  But being that the homeowner, if the homeowner is made aware that the individual doing the
[01:27:44.720 --> 01:27:49.920]  work is not a licensed contractor, I don't see how the state can comment and say, well,
[01:27:49.920 --> 01:27:51.520]  you can't do that because the homeowner...
[01:27:51.520 --> 01:27:55.960]  It would be one thing to hire them as a helper to the homeowner.
[01:27:55.960 --> 01:28:01.320]  It's another thing to hire them as the sole person responsible.
[01:28:01.320 --> 01:28:02.320]  You follow?
[01:28:02.320 --> 01:28:06.560]  Yeah, I'm just, I'm having a hard time with this.
[01:28:06.560 --> 01:28:11.360]  Because if you do the second one, they're just somebody that you're paying to help you
[01:28:11.360 --> 01:28:12.840]  do your own work.
[01:28:12.840 --> 01:28:20.880]  If you do the other one, then they're selling a service that is regulated by state law because
[01:28:20.880 --> 01:28:26.280]  it has a direct impact on public health and safety, even if it's one family's public
[01:28:26.280 --> 01:28:28.280]  health and safety.
[01:28:28.280 --> 01:28:40.320]  Excuse me, the thing I'm having a severe issue with is that once you understand the income
[01:28:40.320 --> 01:28:47.000]  tax and how it's applied and you're not willing to perjure yourself by signing forms, declaring
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:52.280]  you're something that you're not, you basically have to figure out, I'm sure you know it's
[01:28:52.280 --> 01:28:55.640]  paying to get a fine work.
[01:28:55.640 --> 01:28:59.800]  And so, well, you want to start a business, but basically they got you one way or the
[01:28:59.800 --> 01:29:00.800]  other.
[01:29:00.800 --> 01:29:04.360]  There's very little you can do that they don't regulate.
[01:29:04.360 --> 01:29:05.360]  And...
[01:29:05.360 --> 01:29:08.880]  Well, that's why I started my computer business because they can't, they didn't regulate that.
[01:29:08.880 --> 01:29:10.480]  It's an occupation of common right.
[01:29:10.480 --> 01:29:15.520]  You can engage in any occupation of common right and they can't touch you.
[01:29:15.520 --> 01:29:19.600]  And as long as you work for yourself, you don't have to worry about somebody filing false
[01:29:19.600 --> 01:29:24.360]  reports on what you're making as being taxable income when it's actually not.
[01:29:24.360 --> 01:29:27.800]  Yeah.
[01:29:27.800 --> 01:29:32.800]  Without those signed forms, the IRS has nowhere to go legally speaking.
[01:29:32.800 --> 01:29:34.800]  Oh, I know.
[01:29:34.800 --> 01:29:38.960]  It doesn't make quite easy, though.
[01:29:38.960 --> 01:29:42.360]  Well granted, that's where I've been for quite a while now.
[01:29:42.360 --> 01:29:47.360]  When I turned my back on the way things were to do what I believe things were supposed
[01:29:47.360 --> 01:29:52.160]  to be like, yeah, it got hard, believe me, and it hadn't gotten any easier.
[01:29:52.160 --> 01:29:55.160]  All right, hang on, I got another break.
[01:29:55.160 --> 01:30:00.360]  Max, I assume that you, that the other caller on the board, I will give you...
[01:30:00.360 --> 01:30:04.400]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number
[01:30:04.400 --> 01:30:05.400]  and date of birth.
[01:30:05.400 --> 01:30:08.240]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.240 --> 01:30:12.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:12.160 --> 01:30:16.760]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive
[01:30:16.760 --> 01:30:19.400]  database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.400 --> 01:30:20.400]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.400 --> 01:30:22.400]  It doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.400 --> 01:30:25.520]  StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.520 --> 01:30:30.080]  StartPage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[01:30:30.080 --> 01:30:32.360]  cookies and their third party certified.
[01:30:32.360 --> 01:30:36.840]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with StartPage.
[01:30:36.840 --> 01:30:39.400]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.400 --> 01:30:42.920]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.920 --> 01:30:44.920]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:44.920 --> 01:30:48.760]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give
[01:30:48.760 --> 01:30:49.760]  it.
[01:30:49.760 --> 01:30:54.680]  I write spaces on forms all the time or I write n slash a for not applicable and usually
[01:30:54.680 --> 01:30:56.480]  nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.480 --> 01:31:01.040]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory
[01:31:01.040 --> 01:31:05.360]  for employment or a government requirement and I won't give my phone number to a company
[01:31:05.360 --> 01:31:09.500]  or an organization unless I actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.500 --> 01:31:14.640]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.640 --> 01:31:16.280]  It's like exercising a muscle.
[01:31:16.280 --> 01:31:18.080]  It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.080 --> 01:31:31.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.400 --> 01:31:32.400]  I lost my son.
[01:31:32.400 --> 01:31:33.400]  My nephew.
[01:31:33.400 --> 01:31:34.400]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.400 --> 01:31:35.400]  My son.
[01:31:35.400 --> 01:31:36.400]  On September 11th, 2001.
[01:31:36.400 --> 01:31:39.640]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:39.640 --> 01:31:43.800]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.800 --> 01:31:47.640]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:47.640 --> 01:31:52.440]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[01:31:52.440 --> 01:31:53.440]  to the story.
[01:31:53.440 --> 01:31:54.840]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.840 --> 01:31:55.840]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.840 --> 01:31:56.840]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.840 --> 01:31:57.840]  My son.
[01:31:57.840 --> 01:31:58.840]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:58.840 --> 01:31:59.840]  Why it fell.
[01:31:59.840 --> 01:32:00.840]  Why it matters.
[01:32:00.840 --> 01:32:01.840]  And what you can do.
[01:32:01.840 --> 01:32:05.840]  Rula Law Radio is proud to offer the Rula Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.840 --> 01:32:09.360]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[01:32:09.360 --> 01:32:13.440]  going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:16.280]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place.
[01:32:16.280 --> 01:32:19.920]  The right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process
[01:32:19.920 --> 01:32:20.920]  of law.
[01:32:20.920 --> 01:32:24.680]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.680 --> 01:32:26.560]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.560 --> 01:32:30.280]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rula Law Radio has put together the most
[01:32:30.280 --> 01:32:33.800]  comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.800 --> 01:32:36.200]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.200 --> 01:32:40.200]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RulaLawRadio.com and
[01:32:40.200 --> 01:32:41.560]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.560 --> 01:32:44.720]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code
[01:32:44.720 --> 01:32:49.280]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.280 --> 01:32:51.600]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.600 --> 01:32:55.560]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RulaLawRadio.com.
[01:32:55.560 --> 01:33:04.600]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:04.600 --> 01:33:22.360]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:34.600 --> 01:33:44.320]  Hi folks, we are back with the RulaLawRadio with your host Eddie Craig and it's February
[01:33:44.320 --> 01:33:46.120]  27th, 2023.
[01:33:46.120 --> 01:33:52.800]  We are live tonight and we are currently talking with Mike in Arizona and I've got, I'm assuming
[01:33:52.800 --> 01:33:58.640]  Max, my friend waiting in the wings, so Max hang on one more minute.
[01:33:58.640 --> 01:34:02.840]  Okay Mike, let's see if we can wrap this up so I can get the next guy.
[01:34:02.840 --> 01:34:06.160]  Hey Eddie, I'll just let you go right now.
[01:34:06.160 --> 01:34:08.600]  I think I'll call in next week.
[01:34:08.600 --> 01:34:14.880]  I wanted to continue on with this but there's an archive I had listened to, it was one
[01:34:14.880 --> 01:34:20.360]  of the earlier ones, kind of shortly after you first got on the radio show and you were
[01:34:20.360 --> 01:34:28.400]  discussing talking to a guy who had called in who was a, like did massage and you had
[01:34:28.400 --> 01:34:32.120]  said some things to him but I need to listen to that again and I just-
[01:34:32.120 --> 01:34:36.360]  Yeah, that's my friend Jason who's out of Connecticut, so.
[01:34:36.360 --> 01:34:37.360]  Okay.
[01:34:37.360 --> 01:34:42.800]  He's actually in Austin but he was raised in everything, his hometown's in Connecticut,
[01:34:42.800 --> 01:34:43.800]  so.
[01:34:43.800 --> 01:34:49.480]  Okay, yeah, I was just, I recall you saying something that there was had, what some of
[01:34:49.480 --> 01:34:56.280]  the licensing and also there, that limited liability comes into play with the requirement
[01:34:56.280 --> 01:34:58.160]  whereas if you're operating-
[01:34:58.160 --> 01:35:02.360]  Yes, and in his case we were discussing his masseuse license.
[01:35:02.360 --> 01:35:03.360]  Okay.
[01:35:03.360 --> 01:35:09.640]  Yeah, I was kind of just curious if there's a way and that kind of way when one isn't
[01:35:09.640 --> 01:35:15.360]  operating under limited liability, you know, not an LLC, you're just sole proprietor.
[01:35:15.360 --> 01:35:19.840]  Yeah, when you're sole proprietor you have no corporate veil if something goes wrong
[01:35:19.840 --> 01:35:21.840]  and you get sued.
[01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:33.000]  Yeah, so, yeah, it kind of varies as to how you might want to do it, there are reasons
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:38.680]  to be incorporated such as that individual property protection that that corporate veil
[01:35:38.680 --> 01:35:44.360]  offers because without it you and your personal property are subject to any suit that comes
[01:35:44.360 --> 01:35:48.320]  up should you get sued for what you do as a business?
[01:35:48.320 --> 01:35:55.480]  Yeah, I guess what I recall when I was listening to it, it sounded like that you at the time
[01:35:55.480 --> 01:36:02.920]  at least that if you weren't operating under an LLC or some other corporate veil that perhaps
[01:36:02.920 --> 01:36:07.360]  the licensing may not be applicable in that case.
[01:36:07.360 --> 01:36:12.120]  That's entirely possible, but again it depends upon whether the particular occupation is
[01:36:12.120 --> 01:36:15.800]  considered an occupation of common right.
[01:36:15.800 --> 01:36:20.480]  Like C for instance, if you actually read most of the regulatory statutes that regulate
[01:36:20.480 --> 01:36:27.440]  entities like that, they specifically spell out that they only regulate incorporated entities.
[01:36:27.440 --> 01:36:32.580]  You just have to read them and figure that out to see what they're listing, but they
[01:36:32.580 --> 01:36:37.240]  only affect incorporated entities in some case.
[01:36:37.240 --> 01:36:42.280]  What I was trying to get at because when I was reading for the contractor's licensing
[01:36:42.280 --> 01:36:46.240]  there was a section when I was going through definitions that it said like something along
[01:36:46.240 --> 01:36:52.160]  the line of contractor is synonymous with commercial builder, and then I couldn't find
[01:36:52.160 --> 01:36:56.840]  a definition for commercial builder, so that was kind of the rabbit trail I was thinking.
[01:36:56.840 --> 01:37:06.520]  Well, they're also using the Agenda 21 universal, let's see, development code I think it is.
[01:37:06.520 --> 01:37:11.280]  That'll have all the definitions that most states have adopted to use in their individual
[01:37:11.280 --> 01:37:12.280]  codes like that.
[01:37:12.280 --> 01:37:13.280]  Okay.
[01:37:13.280 --> 01:37:24.280]  Yeah, I'm going to just get back to it, see what I can find, probably call it quick, man.
[01:37:24.280 --> 01:37:25.280]  All right, well good luck.
[01:37:25.280 --> 01:37:26.280]  I hope I helped.
[01:37:26.280 --> 01:37:27.280]  I appreciate it.
[01:37:27.280 --> 01:37:28.280]  Bye.
[01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:29.280]  Bye-bye.
[01:37:29.280 --> 01:37:33.760]  All right, now we have Samantha in Texas.
[01:37:33.760 --> 01:37:35.760]  Hi, Samantha.
[01:37:35.760 --> 01:37:38.280]  Hi, Eddie, how are you?
[01:37:38.280 --> 01:37:39.280]  I'm good.
[01:37:39.280 --> 01:37:40.280]  Are you related to Max?
[01:37:40.280 --> 01:37:41.280]  I sure am.
[01:37:41.280 --> 01:37:42.280]  Okay.
[01:37:42.280 --> 01:37:44.280]  He's two minutes behind me.
[01:37:44.280 --> 01:37:45.280]  All right.
[01:37:45.280 --> 01:37:47.280]  What can I do for you?
[01:37:47.280 --> 01:37:52.280]  Well, I was calling in because he stopped me in the middle of everything I was doing
[01:37:52.280 --> 01:37:54.280]  and said, you got to listen to this, you got to listen to this.
[01:37:54.280 --> 01:37:59.400]  I hear you want to do some unification of some agencies and do some marketing to help
[01:37:59.400 --> 01:38:03.280]  our fine government come back to where it could be.
[01:38:03.280 --> 01:38:11.480]  Yes, except not agencies but actual individuals and private entities, things like Project
[01:38:11.480 --> 01:38:18.000]  Veritas, all these independent cop watchers and First Amendment auditors, and try to figure
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:24.880]  out a way to get us all unified, organized, educated, and working together so that we
[01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:33.360]  can secure, hopefully, a good amount of funding to replace the mainstream media with Truth
[01:38:33.360 --> 01:38:35.480]  and Facts for a change.
[01:38:35.480 --> 01:38:41.880]  I think that is absolutely noble, that's the great thing, you know, I've had an interesting
[01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:48.840]  couple of years and Max puts your show on on a regular basis and it's really interesting
[01:38:48.840 --> 01:38:49.840]  to see.
[01:38:49.840 --> 01:38:55.000]  Well, I'm sorry you got to listen to me yell that loud for that long, but okay.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:58.760]  Don't worry, he doesn't turn it up too loud, I can tell you.
[01:38:58.760 --> 01:39:02.720]  Yeah, well, with me, you don't have to turn it up too loud, I could be annoyed from any
[01:39:02.720 --> 01:39:03.720]  distance.
[01:39:03.720 --> 01:39:10.240]  Well, it shows your passion though, you know, I've kind of asked Max your story a little
[01:39:10.240 --> 01:39:15.680]  bit about why you do all this, he told me a little bit and I actually look forward to
[01:39:15.680 --> 01:39:19.840]  finding out more and finding out your why and a little bit more, I'm going to shoot
[01:39:19.840 --> 01:39:24.640]  you an email over, I sat here and listened, put together a little one page marketing plan
[01:39:24.640 --> 01:39:31.080]  and you can throw it in with a bunch, if anybody else sends anything and we can have a conversation,
[01:39:31.080 --> 01:39:36.600]  let's start a conversation and that's kind of where it blooms from, you know what I
[01:39:36.600 --> 01:39:37.600]  mean?
[01:39:37.600 --> 01:39:38.600]  Yeah.
[01:39:38.600 --> 01:39:39.600]  Yeah.
[01:39:39.600 --> 01:39:45.960]  Well, as far as my personal reason for doing these things, it really started for me when
[01:39:45.960 --> 01:39:49.800]  the county tax assessor tried to steal my mom's property.
[01:39:49.800 --> 01:39:51.080]  Oh no.
[01:39:51.080 --> 01:39:57.520]  And so I dug deep and hard into the county or into the state tax code and found out that
[01:39:57.520 --> 01:40:02.640]  90% of what they had done up to the point they tried to take her property was absolutely
[01:40:02.640 --> 01:40:05.480]  illegal.
[01:40:05.480 --> 01:40:09.040]  And I went after them for it because at that time I was making really good money and had
[01:40:09.040 --> 01:40:12.880]  the resources to do it and I went down there and made it very clear, I was coming after
[01:40:12.880 --> 01:40:17.800]  everybody in that place but most of all, the guy who did the tax assessment because see
[01:40:17.800 --> 01:40:25.720]  here in Texas, the law says that that tax assessment must be signed and that the person
[01:40:25.720 --> 01:40:33.960]  who signed it actually did very specific things required by law such as an onsite inspection
[01:40:33.960 --> 01:40:40.880]  of the property, an onsite inspection of each building both inside and out.
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:46.320]  Now that requirement alone tells you that they're only allowed to assess taxes on commercial
[01:40:46.320 --> 01:40:52.760]  property that are publicly accessible because otherwise they would need a warrant to do
[01:40:52.760 --> 01:40:55.840]  a tax assessment.
[01:40:55.840 --> 01:41:00.560]  To enter into a private dwelling on private property, that county official would have
[01:41:00.560 --> 01:41:05.760]  to have a warrant to go into those buildings to perform that assessment, that's just straight
[01:41:05.760 --> 01:41:09.080]  up legal common sense.
[01:41:09.080 --> 01:41:13.560]  So the requirement that they have and do these things tells you right off the bat that they're
[01:41:13.560 --> 01:41:18.920]  only allowed to be taxing commercial property to begin with and they're not doing that.
[01:41:18.920 --> 01:41:24.640]  So everything they're doing at that level and for those purposes and many others is
[01:41:24.640 --> 01:41:30.520]  fraud and that is why I am so impassioned to do something about it.
[01:41:30.520 --> 01:41:34.560]  It's basically the same thing you see with the auditors having to deal with the cops on
[01:41:34.560 --> 01:41:35.560]  the side of the road.
[01:41:35.560 --> 01:41:40.400]  They don't know the law, they tell you they do, they act like they do, they talk like
[01:41:40.400 --> 01:41:50.640]  they do but they're dumber than a bag of rocks and have less personality.
[01:41:50.640 --> 01:41:55.680]  I actually had an experience that this last year with it for the first time normally,
[01:41:55.680 --> 01:42:01.120]  you know, it seemed like in the past, my experiences with police officers, you know, registration
[01:42:01.120 --> 01:42:07.120]  expires, whatever, it seemed like they were, you know, somewhat cordial, you know, think
[01:42:07.120 --> 01:42:09.480]  of the soccer mom with the many band full of kids, right?
[01:42:09.480 --> 01:42:10.480]  That was me.
[01:42:10.480 --> 01:42:11.480]  Right.
[01:42:11.480 --> 01:42:17.480]  But this last year I was pulled over by a gentleman and he, basically what happened
[01:42:17.480 --> 01:42:23.400]  is I was going through the light and I had a semi truck push me into the other lane.
[01:42:23.400 --> 01:42:30.940]  He didn't stop the truck, he stopped me and I was just, I was incensed with it and Max
[01:42:30.940 --> 01:42:35.240]  helped me understand, you know, some of what I could do and not do and things like that
[01:42:35.240 --> 01:42:39.680]  and I was just like, I couldn't believe the system, I couldn't believe everything that
[01:42:39.680 --> 01:42:40.680]  happened.
[01:42:40.680 --> 01:42:41.680]  It just had me.
[01:42:41.680 --> 01:42:44.480]  That was utterly ridiculous, wasn't it?
[01:42:44.480 --> 01:42:51.640]  Yeah, absolutely and they dropped some of it but only if I paid this other and there
[01:42:51.640 --> 01:42:55.400]  was it, either way, whether they dropped it or not, there was this huge administrative
[01:42:55.400 --> 01:43:00.560]  fee that the administrative fee was more expensive than the ticket was.
[01:43:00.560 --> 01:43:01.560]  Yeah.
[01:43:01.560 --> 01:43:04.960]  And it turns out those administrative fees in Texas have been declared unconstitutional.
[01:43:04.960 --> 01:43:05.960]  Oh, wow.
[01:43:05.960 --> 01:43:06.960]  Does that make sense?
[01:43:06.960 --> 01:43:11.560]  See, here's the thing about administrative fees.
[01:43:11.560 --> 01:43:17.360]  See, we have a prohibition in our state bill of rights against bills of pains and penalties.
[01:43:17.360 --> 01:43:18.360]  Okay.
[01:43:18.360 --> 01:43:19.360]  Okay.
[01:43:19.360 --> 01:43:27.160]  And by bills of pains and penalties, we also have, it's actually against bills of attainder
[01:43:27.160 --> 01:43:35.840]  but a bill of pains and penalties is a somewhat lesser form of a bill of attainder.
[01:43:35.840 --> 01:43:36.840]  Okay.
[01:43:36.840 --> 01:43:41.840]  Basically, it means administrative punishment without judicial review.
[01:43:41.840 --> 01:43:45.960]  Let me, let me take this break and I'll get into this a little bit more with you on the
[01:43:45.960 --> 01:43:46.960]  other side.
[01:43:46.960 --> 01:43:47.960]  Okay.
[01:43:47.960 --> 01:43:49.520]  Just a minute.
[01:43:49.520 --> 01:43:50.520]  Okay.
[01:43:50.520 --> 01:43:51.520]  All right, folks.
[01:43:51.520 --> 01:43:52.520]  Five ones.
[01:43:52.520 --> 01:43:53.520]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[01:43:53.520 --> 01:43:55.800]  I'm coming up on the last segment so I don't need to get that number out for this one but
[01:43:55.800 --> 01:44:00.400]  y'all hang on and we'll be right back to wrap up the show.
[01:44:00.400 --> 01:44:06.440]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.440 --> 01:44:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.200 --> 01:44:17.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.040 --> 01:44:22.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:44:22.240 --> 01:44:25.680]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.680 --> 01:44:30.360]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.360 --> 01:44:31.360]  we reject.
[01:44:31.360 --> 01:44:33.880]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:33.880 --> 01:44:39.880]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.880 --> 01:44:45.840]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:45.840 --> 01:44:47.440]  quality radio.
[01:44:47.440 --> 01:44:51.760]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.760 --> 01:44:57.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  increase your income.
[01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Order now.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.200 --> 01:45:10.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:10.960 --> 01:45:14.920]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:14.920 --> 01:45:18.760]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.760 --> 01:45:22.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.920 --> 01:45:27.840]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.840 --> 01:45:34.360]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.360 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.400]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.400 --> 01:45:49.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.640 --> 01:45:52.400]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.400 --> 01:46:00.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.240 --> 01:46:16.400]  All right folks, we are back, this is rule of law radio, February 27th, 2023.
[01:46:16.400 --> 01:46:23.080]  We are now in the last segment of the show, and I have Ms. Samantha up on the board here.
[01:46:23.080 --> 01:46:26.320]  Okay, bills of pains and penalties.
[01:46:26.320 --> 01:46:31.040]  These administrative fees that the Texas legislature authorized the Department of Public Safety
[01:46:31.040 --> 01:46:37.360]  to assess relative to the transportation code in certain offenses, they're unconstitutional
[01:46:37.360 --> 01:46:43.800]  because they are a bill of pains and penalties, and here's the logic behind that, okay?
[01:46:43.800 --> 01:46:50.760]  Since the definition of a bill of pains and penalties is a punishment that has no judicial
[01:46:50.760 --> 01:46:54.920]  review, it's unconstitutional.
[01:46:54.920 --> 01:47:00.400]  Now, when you go to court, the administrative fees are not part of the judgment, they're
[01:47:00.400 --> 01:47:04.320]  not decided by the jury, they're not decided by the judge.
[01:47:04.320 --> 01:47:11.720]  They are 100% assessed by the administrative agency, and the court and the jury are never
[01:47:11.720 --> 01:47:15.000]  told or do anything with them.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:20.680]  They're never told about them, they never touch them, they're a separate individual punishment
[01:47:20.680 --> 01:47:26.960]  levied by the state agency on top of what was actually adjudicated in the court.
[01:47:26.960 --> 01:47:33.480]  Hence, it is on its face blatantly unconstitutional as a bill of pains and penalties because
[01:47:33.480 --> 01:47:41.000]  there is no judge that ever reviews the assessment of the administrative fees in a judicial setting,
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  okay?
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:46.080]  So there was no judge involved anyways, it was just the prosecutor.
[01:47:46.080 --> 01:47:47.080]  I was shocked.
[01:47:47.080 --> 01:47:50.760]  That's the thing, the prosecutor doesn't have the authority under the Code of Criminal
[01:47:50.760 --> 01:47:55.600]  Procedure to do 90% of the crap they do.
[01:47:55.600 --> 01:48:01.040]  And the thing about it is, is them forcing the accused individual to take a meeting with
[01:48:01.040 --> 01:48:07.720]  the person prosecuting them without having legal counsel present or provided is itself
[01:48:07.720 --> 01:48:08.720]  unconstitutional.
[01:48:08.720 --> 01:48:20.200]  I wondered, I was like, how come I'm meeting with you and why, I mean, there was another
[01:48:20.200 --> 01:48:24.480]  person's lawyer there meeting with the prosecutor for somebody else, and I'm like, okay, that
[01:48:24.480 --> 01:48:30.080]  seemed very, very appropriate and normal, but why am I just, you know, by myself, you
[01:48:30.080 --> 01:48:34.640]  know, talking to this person, because the system is rigged against you with exactly
[01:48:34.640 --> 01:48:36.640]  that in mind.
[01:48:36.640 --> 01:48:41.240]  Which is what your, your husband has had to learn from me over the years.
[01:48:41.240 --> 01:48:47.960]  Yes, and he's slowly getting it through my thick skull.
[01:48:47.960 --> 01:48:53.760]  Well, believe it or not, he's right, he's telling, he's trying to educate you to see
[01:48:53.760 --> 01:48:59.280]  the dangers of talking and doing without understanding the rules of the game.
[01:48:59.280 --> 01:49:02.840]  And believe me, that's how they want you, dumb and pain.
[01:49:02.840 --> 01:49:04.360]  That's how they want you.
[01:49:04.360 --> 01:49:05.360]  Yes.
[01:49:05.360 --> 01:49:11.680]  Well, and I had to giggle at your last collar because I actually work as a bookkeeper right
[01:49:11.680 --> 01:49:16.840]  now, and that's one of the things that people ask about all the time is taxes and all that
[01:49:16.840 --> 01:49:17.840]  kind of stuff.
[01:49:17.840 --> 01:49:23.440]  And I was just giggling, I'm like, they just, they are going to get you one way or the other.
[01:49:23.440 --> 01:49:26.560]  If you don't know how to play, yes they will.
[01:49:26.560 --> 01:49:30.680]  And the thing about it is, is most people that get hit with something, especially from
[01:49:30.680 --> 01:49:37.800]  the IRS, it's their fault they got hit because they filled out a form that said they were
[01:49:37.800 --> 01:49:40.960]  something that legally they aren't.
[01:49:40.960 --> 01:49:47.600]  And now they're stuck with it because now either A, you are, you're not going to pay
[01:49:47.600 --> 01:49:53.400]  a tax you have sworn on an affidavit form under penalty of perjury that you actually
[01:49:53.400 --> 01:49:59.720]  owe or B, you're going to renege on the signature on that form and then you're going to charge
[01:49:59.720 --> 01:50:04.120]  with aggravated perjury for making a false statement under oath.
[01:50:04.120 --> 01:50:07.240]  It's a catch 22 and they damn well know it.
[01:50:07.240 --> 01:50:08.240]  Yeah.
[01:50:08.240 --> 01:50:09.240]  Yeah.
[01:50:09.240 --> 01:50:12.960]  I, I, I jotted that down earlier, occupation of common right.
[01:50:12.960 --> 01:50:16.680]  I'm going to go look into that a little bit further that that's really interesting to
[01:50:16.680 --> 01:50:17.680]  me.
[01:50:17.680 --> 01:50:18.680]  So.
[01:50:18.680 --> 01:50:19.680]  Yes.
[01:50:19.680 --> 01:50:23.320]  They cannot regulate and license an occupation of common right.
[01:50:23.320 --> 01:50:27.960]  And there's, there's tons of Supreme Court case law on that subject of occupations of
[01:50:27.960 --> 01:50:28.960]  common right.
[01:50:28.960 --> 01:50:37.640]  In fact, one of the leading cases in Texas on this right now is a case called Patel and
[01:50:37.640 --> 01:50:46.440]  it was a, an eyebrow tweezer, an individual who was trying to do a business as an eyebrow
[01:50:46.440 --> 01:50:51.160]  tweezer, you know, where they just used the strings and roll them over your eyebrows to
[01:50:51.160 --> 01:50:54.480]  regulate the length of your eyebrows and everything.
[01:50:54.480 --> 01:50:55.480]  Yeah.
[01:50:55.480 --> 01:51:03.160]  And the state licensing board for cosmetologists were forcing them to pay for the same license
[01:51:03.160 --> 01:51:12.120]  that beauticians and barbers and everybody else have to go get to become what they do.
[01:51:12.120 --> 01:51:17.520]  And the Texas Supreme Court is like, this is stupid.
[01:51:17.520 --> 01:51:24.080]  Why would you tell somebody that uses two pieces of string to rub over someone's eyebrows
[01:51:24.080 --> 01:51:30.720]  that they have to have the same license and training as a cosmetologist who does a thousand
[01:51:30.720 --> 01:51:37.680]  different things more than that as well as barbers who do a thousand different things
[01:51:37.680 --> 01:51:38.680]  more than that?
[01:51:38.680 --> 01:51:41.440]  Why would you make this person have that license?
[01:51:41.440 --> 01:51:46.760]  And the Supreme Court says, occupation of common right, you can't make them have that
[01:51:46.760 --> 01:51:47.760]  license.
[01:51:47.760 --> 01:51:48.760]  Very cool.
[01:51:48.760 --> 01:51:49.760]  All right.
[01:51:49.760 --> 01:51:55.480]  So I actually have a copy of that case, so if you want to send me an email, I'll be
[01:51:55.480 --> 01:52:00.480]  happy to reply back to it with a copy of the case so you can read it.
[01:52:00.480 --> 01:52:07.800]  But another interesting thing about that is since the case deals with occupational licensing,
[01:52:07.800 --> 01:52:13.440]  it's real interesting to notice that the court actually discusses the use of driver's licenses
[01:52:13.440 --> 01:52:20.720]  in the same comparison language they're using for cosmetologists, barbers versus eyebrow
[01:52:20.720 --> 01:52:21.720]  tweezers.
[01:52:21.720 --> 01:52:22.720]  Interesting.
[01:52:22.720 --> 01:52:29.880]  Now, why would the state Supreme Court talk about driver's licensing in an occupational
[01:52:29.880 --> 01:52:31.480]  licensing case?
[01:52:31.480 --> 01:52:34.080]  Well, I'll tell you why.
[01:52:34.080 --> 01:52:38.920]  If you actually understand the Texas Administrative Code and its links and connect the dots to
[01:52:38.920 --> 01:52:44.400]  the Texas Transportation Code, that's exactly what a driver's license is for.
[01:52:44.400 --> 01:52:47.400]  It's an occupation for like...
[01:52:47.400 --> 01:52:55.640]  It's an occupational license for a publicly regulated, privileged occupation, not an
[01:52:55.640 --> 01:53:01.240]  occupation of common right.
[01:53:01.240 --> 01:53:02.240]  That's interesting.
[01:53:02.240 --> 01:53:03.240]  Yeah.
[01:53:03.240 --> 01:53:07.640]  Now, how often does that search engine going to bring up tweezers?
[01:53:07.640 --> 01:53:11.520]  I bet it's not very often you talk about tweezers, Eddie.
[01:53:11.520 --> 01:53:19.760]  I couldn't tell you, but I can tell you that most of the things that the officials of the
[01:53:19.760 --> 01:53:25.120]  state, doesn't matter what level they are, most of the things they tell you, they're
[01:53:25.120 --> 01:53:30.200]  going off of their belief, not actual personal knowledge.
[01:53:30.200 --> 01:53:32.760]  And that includes attorneys and judges.
[01:53:32.760 --> 01:53:33.760]  Absolutely.
[01:53:33.760 --> 01:53:42.400]  Or administrative bureaucrats, they're telling you what they think they know, when in fact
[01:53:42.400 --> 01:53:44.800]  they don't know squat.
[01:53:44.800 --> 01:53:49.560]  They're doing only what they've been trained to do, and the idiot that trained them was
[01:53:49.560 --> 01:53:55.640]  just as dumb as they are, and thus we have a problem.
[01:53:55.640 --> 01:54:01.680]  Imagine how the space program would have worked if one idiot was allowed to train everybody
[01:54:01.680 --> 01:54:06.840]  else to be the same kind of idiot he was.
[01:54:06.840 --> 01:54:07.840]  They'd use the chimpanzee.
[01:54:07.840 --> 01:54:12.480]  The chimpanzee would be training everybody.
[01:54:12.480 --> 01:54:16.000]  There are certain instances where I've put more faith in the chimpanzees' abilities
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:18.920]  than I would the human beings.
[01:54:18.920 --> 01:54:25.280]  You're probably right, it would be better off if they did use the chimps.
[01:54:25.280 --> 01:54:26.280]  Yeah.
[01:54:26.280 --> 01:54:28.640]  I mean, officer, I really don't deserve this ticket.
[01:54:28.640 --> 01:54:33.760]  You're having a banana.
[01:54:33.760 --> 01:54:36.720]  Everybody would probably be a lot happier.
[01:54:36.720 --> 01:54:37.720]  Probably.
[01:54:37.720 --> 01:54:38.720]  Yeah.
[01:54:38.720 --> 01:54:43.320]  There's a book, I'm trying to remember the name of it, and I read it a couple of years
[01:54:43.320 --> 01:54:49.840]  ago when I first started listening, and they were talking about the bias of judges against
[01:54:49.840 --> 01:54:55.840]  different groups, and that just struck me as well.
[01:54:55.840 --> 01:55:01.080]  I mean, it was like, because it's all about their feelings and how they feel, and imagine
[01:55:01.080 --> 01:55:07.400]  that if your judge just had their dog die, or their mom die, or their wife tell them
[01:55:07.400 --> 01:55:11.360]  something horrible, or something happened with their kids, they're going into your case
[01:55:11.360 --> 01:55:14.840]  with this horrible feeling already.
[01:55:14.840 --> 01:55:21.440]  That increases their bias to discipline you, or the police officer that goes out and their
[01:55:21.440 --> 01:55:26.280]  mom, the subject of your case happens to hit home on something that's close to home for
[01:55:26.280 --> 01:55:27.280]  them.
[01:55:27.280 --> 01:55:28.280]  Exactly.
[01:55:28.280 --> 01:55:29.280]  The exact same problem.
[01:55:29.280 --> 01:55:34.880]  For instance, you're being, when they used to have those laws on the book, dealing with
[01:55:34.880 --> 01:55:38.800]  interference of a marriage relationship.
[01:55:38.800 --> 01:55:40.000]  That used to be a crime.
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:42.360]  There used to be laws on the books about that.
[01:55:42.360 --> 01:55:46.360]  I forget exactly what the title of it was, but they used to have them.
[01:55:46.360 --> 01:55:53.120]  Now imagine that the judge sitting in your case just had his wife file for divorce because
[01:55:53.120 --> 01:55:59.280]  she had done something like that, or he had been caught being unfaithful, et cetera, et
[01:55:59.280 --> 01:56:00.280]  cetera.
[01:56:00.280 --> 01:56:01.280]  Right.
[01:56:01.280 --> 01:56:02.280]  Right.
[01:56:02.280 --> 01:56:03.280]  Yeah.
[01:56:03.280 --> 01:56:08.400]  But see, that's also the problem with letting one particular group of people control an entire
[01:56:08.400 --> 01:56:14.560]  branch of government, and then have control of all the major offices and all the other
[01:56:14.560 --> 01:56:16.560]  branches of government.
[01:56:16.560 --> 01:56:24.800]  See here in Texas and virtually every other state, every office of power in our government
[01:56:24.800 --> 01:56:27.240]  is occupied by an attorney.
[01:56:27.240 --> 01:56:30.280]  Every last one, our current governor is an attorney.
[01:56:30.280 --> 01:56:32.400]  Our state attorney general is an attorney.
[01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:39.160]  Hell, our secretary of state, one of them was an attorney.
[01:56:39.160 --> 01:56:44.240]  All of our legislators, the majority of them are attorneys.
[01:56:44.240 --> 01:56:51.840]  Every single office of power, and everybody in the judiciary is an attorney, everybody.
[01:56:51.840 --> 01:56:57.960]  The prosecutors, the defenses, attorneys, and the judges, they're all attorneys.
[01:56:57.960 --> 01:57:04.880]  There is not one occupation in the judicial department of any power that the people can
[01:57:04.880 --> 01:57:05.980]  occupy.
[01:57:05.980 --> 01:57:12.280]  We are only allowed without a law degree and a jurist-doctorate degree in our hand.
[01:57:12.280 --> 01:57:17.680]  We are not allowed to sit as a judge in any court of record.
[01:57:17.680 --> 01:57:23.360]  We can only sit in courts of no record as justices of the peace or as small municipal
[01:57:23.360 --> 01:57:28.240]  court judges that don't have actual a record keeper for the court.
[01:57:28.240 --> 01:57:30.960]  It's not a court of record.
[01:57:30.960 --> 01:57:37.200]  So given that, the people have been completely disenfranchised of holding any position of
[01:57:37.200 --> 01:57:41.080]  authority within the judicial department of our government.
[01:57:41.080 --> 01:57:47.760]  There is now the elitist cabal of individual zone as attorneys that have absolute total
[01:57:47.760 --> 01:57:54.400]  control of the judicial branch and sit in all the major power offices in all the other
[01:57:54.400 --> 01:57:59.560]  branches, which is a violation of separation of powers agreement here in Texas.
[01:57:59.560 --> 01:58:05.280]  Because the state bar they all belong to is actually an administrative office under the
[01:58:05.280 --> 01:58:10.960]  judicial branch, which means they're forbidden by Article 2 to exercise any power in authority
[01:58:10.960 --> 01:58:17.360]  belonging to any other office or member of any other branch, such as the legislature
[01:58:17.360 --> 01:58:19.960]  or the executive in the form of the government.
[01:58:19.960 --> 01:58:25.240]  So yeah, that's trying to keep the right lying to us.
[01:58:25.240 --> 01:58:26.560]  They're stealing from us.
[01:58:26.560 --> 01:58:31.080]  They're defrauding us and the more people we educate, which was the goal of what I started
[01:58:31.080 --> 01:58:33.080]  with tonight, the better.
[01:58:33.080 --> 01:58:38.440]  So that's what I want to try to do is organize a way to organize these people, organize these
[01:58:38.440 --> 01:58:41.320]  functions, and make us work together.
[01:58:41.320 --> 01:58:42.960]  Anyway, sweetheart, I appreciate your call.
[01:58:42.960 --> 01:58:50.280]  I am out of time and I thank you for the call and email, okay?
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:56.400]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.400 --> 01:58:57.600]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.600 --> 01:59:02.560]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.560 --> 01:59:08.240]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.240 --> 01:59:11.600]  Here's your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.600 --> 01:59:20.560]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.560 --> 01:59:26.080]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.080 --> 01:59:30.120]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.120 --> 01:59:32.680]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.680 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.200]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.200 --> 01:59:52.840]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.840 --> 01:59:54.360]  You found it.
[01:59:54.360 --> 02:00:03.200]  Visit us at BiblesForAmerica.com.