ROL_2023-02-24_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.720]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.720 --> 00:09.400]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.400 --> 00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.800 --> 00:16.920]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.920 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.100]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.100 --> 00:26.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.880 --> 00:31.960]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.960 --> 00:34.640]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.640 --> 00:39.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:39.000 --> 00:42.480]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.480 --> 00:44.600]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.600 --> 00:47.760]  SPAR, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.760 --> 00:51.240]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.240 --> 00:56.600]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to SPAR with you, SPAR with an extra P.
[00:56.600 --> 01:03.040]  Press for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.040 --> 01:06.920]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.920 --> 01:08.440]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.440 --> 01:10.800]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.800 --> 01:14.520]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.520 --> 01:17.880]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell
[01:17.880 --> 01:20.680]  out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.680 --> 01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:34.680]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.680 --> 01:38.120]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.120 --> 01:39.600]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.600 --> 01:43.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.480 --> 01:46.640]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.640 --> 01:48.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.200 --> 01:51.800]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.800 --> 01:56.600]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.600 --> 02:01.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.840 --> 02:04.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.320 --> 02:08.640]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.640 --> 02:12.160]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.160 --> 02:15.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.760 --> 02:20.120]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.120 --> 02:22.200]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.200 --> 02:26.680]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms.
[02:26.680 --> 02:30.560]  Arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.560 --> 02:31.560]  Get it?
[02:31.560 --> 02:32.560]  Two arms?
[02:32.560 --> 02:33.560]  Bear hug?
[02:33.560 --> 02:34.560]  Bear arms?
[02:34.560 --> 02:37.600]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.600 --> 02:42.240]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against
[02:42.240 --> 02:47.520]  arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America
[02:47.520 --> 02:50.520]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.520 --> 03:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:17.000 --> 03:36.880]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking
[03:36.880 --> 03:39.600]  to Nancy in Pennsylvania.
[03:39.600 --> 03:44.600]  Okay, where were we?
[03:44.600 --> 03:45.600]  You were...
[03:45.600 --> 03:48.320]  We talked about giving the state an opportunity to cure.
[03:48.320 --> 03:52.560]  Now, I did a notice of claim, is that the same thing you mean?
[03:52.560 --> 03:54.040]  Yes, same thing.
[03:54.040 --> 03:56.440]  Okay, because I didn't hear anything from...
[03:56.440 --> 03:57.440]  It's...
[03:57.440 --> 03:58.440]  I didn't get any...
[03:58.440 --> 04:00.720]  It's essentially a tort letter.
[04:00.720 --> 04:01.720]  Who did...
[04:01.720 --> 04:02.720]  Yeah.
[04:02.720 --> 04:03.720]  Who did you...
[04:03.720 --> 04:04.720]  Who are you suing?
[04:04.720 --> 04:15.520]  Well, it would be the trooper, the judge and clerk magistrate at the Kangaroo Court.
[04:15.520 --> 04:16.520]  Okay.
[04:16.520 --> 04:17.520]  The registrar.
[04:17.520 --> 04:18.520]  How?
[04:18.520 --> 04:19.520]  Okay, I understand.
[04:19.520 --> 04:20.520]  Okay, hold on.
[04:20.520 --> 04:21.520]  I understand how you can get to the trooper.
[04:21.520 --> 04:24.520]  You can sue the trooper because he committed assault.
[04:24.520 --> 04:25.520]  18...
[04:25.520 --> 04:45.240]  Oh, here it is, 2701 of the Pennsylvania Code, 2701A3, attempts by physical menace to
[04:45.240 --> 04:52.560]  put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury.
[04:52.560 --> 05:04.040]  He yelled at you while he was prominently displaying a deadly weapon and caused you
[05:04.040 --> 05:06.400]  high anxiety.
[05:06.400 --> 05:17.400]  What you have to do to get to them is you have to get them outside of scope and by going
[05:17.400 --> 05:25.760]  after him for violating this criminal statute, that puts him outside scope.
[05:25.760 --> 05:30.560]  Yeah, but now, am I going to be using Massachusetts statute?
[05:30.560 --> 05:32.720]  I have to find Massachusetts statute in...
[05:32.720 --> 05:35.000]  Oh, you're in Pennsylvania.
[05:35.000 --> 05:36.000]  This didn't happen in Pennsylvania.
[05:36.000 --> 05:37.000]  I'm in Pennsylvania.
[05:37.000 --> 05:39.720]  I was visiting Massachusetts when this happened.
[05:39.720 --> 05:40.720]  Oh, okay.
[05:40.720 --> 05:47.200]  And so, I'm going to bring everyone down to the courts here in Pennsylvania, a federal
[05:47.200 --> 05:56.000]  court, but I assume I have to use Massachusetts statute and just...
[05:56.000 --> 05:57.000]  Yes.
[05:57.000 --> 05:58.000]  Yeah, okay.
[05:58.000 --> 06:02.200]  Let's see what we got for a simple assault.
[06:02.200 --> 06:03.200]  Yeah.
[06:03.200 --> 06:12.360]  Massachusetts has a special assault on 60 and older, so that was definitely one of the
[06:12.360 --> 06:15.960]  statutes I was going to cite.
[06:15.960 --> 06:16.960]  Oh, wonderful.
[06:16.960 --> 06:17.960]  Yeah.
[06:17.960 --> 06:24.000]  Well, I haven't looked at Massachusetts law.
[06:24.000 --> 06:26.000]  I'm not sure how...
[06:26.000 --> 06:28.000]  I think it's...
[06:28.000 --> 06:29.640] ... they are about these issues.
[06:29.640 --> 06:36.720]  To see a summons, assault or assault in battery punishment, whoever commits an assault or an
[06:36.720 --> 06:40.480]  assault in battery upon another shall be punished by...
[06:40.480 --> 06:42.640]  It's not helpful.
[06:42.640 --> 06:45.640]  Yeah.
[06:45.640 --> 06:53.960]  Title I, Chapter 265, Part 4 of Massachusetts General Law, Section 13A, whoever commits
[06:53.960 --> 07:01.000]  an assault or an assault in battery upon another shall be punished by imprisonment for not
[07:01.000 --> 07:07.240]  more than two and a half years and house of correction or by a fine of not more than $1,000
[07:07.240 --> 07:08.240]  goes on from there.
[07:08.240 --> 07:12.240]  But this doesn't save what is an assault.
[07:12.240 --> 07:13.240]  Oh, okay.
[07:13.240 --> 07:14.240]  Okay.
[07:14.240 --> 07:20.160]  So then, 15B, assault with dangerous weapon, victim, 60-year-older, whoever by means of
[07:20.160 --> 07:25.560]  a dangerous weapon commits an assault upon a person, 60-years-older shall be punished.
[07:25.560 --> 07:26.560]  And whoever...
[07:26.560 --> 07:27.560]  Okay.
[07:27.560 --> 07:28.560]  Right.
[07:28.560 --> 07:29.560]  You don't...
[07:29.560 --> 07:39.080]  It doesn't say exactly, doesn't define it, it just says by a dangerous weapon.
[07:39.080 --> 07:41.960]  And then there's also violations of constitutional rights.
[07:41.960 --> 07:54.840]  I have to look up some of Massachusetts case law to find out what constitutes an assault.
[07:54.840 --> 07:57.400]  Mm-hmm.
[07:57.400 --> 08:07.280]  Generally, simple assault is defined as offensive speech or offensive touching.
[08:07.280 --> 08:12.560]  And praising his voice to you would be offensive speech.
[08:12.560 --> 08:13.560]  Yeah.
[08:13.560 --> 08:21.000]  Well, that's so consistent between the Fed and most all the states that it's almost
[08:21.000 --> 08:24.160]  certainly going to be the same in Massachusetts.
[08:24.160 --> 08:25.160]  Yeah.
[08:25.160 --> 08:27.480]  The thing is, I don't have any evidence.
[08:27.480 --> 08:29.480]  I did not record...
[08:29.480 --> 08:30.480]  Who cares?
[08:30.480 --> 08:31.480]  Who cares?
[08:31.480 --> 08:32.480]  Okay.
[08:32.480 --> 08:33.480]  All right.
[08:33.480 --> 08:38.280]  You say it here, he's going to have... he should have a body cam.
[08:38.280 --> 08:42.160]  Yeah, I started getting that and it...
[08:42.160 --> 08:43.160]  Yeah.
[08:43.160 --> 08:48.480]  If he doesn't have a body cam, he should have had a body cam.
[08:48.480 --> 08:54.680]  Or do they require body cams or did they at the time this occurred require that...
[08:54.680 --> 08:58.600]  Did Massachusetts police have body cams?
[08:58.600 --> 09:02.000]  Yeah, I think so.
[09:02.000 --> 09:10.880]  If they had one and he didn't have it on, that goes to spoilation.
[09:10.880 --> 09:19.000]  And you can ask the court to accept your version of the story because he did not turn on his
[09:19.000 --> 09:26.160]  body cam because he intended to act inappropriately and did not want it videotaped and that was
[09:26.160 --> 09:28.640]  a spoilation.
[09:28.640 --> 09:38.400]  But under the spoilation rules, the court must accept your version is true.
[09:38.400 --> 09:41.800]  That's what he gets for denying you the evidence.
[09:41.800 --> 09:48.840]  So, but you're in Pennsylvania there in Massachusetts.
[09:48.840 --> 09:51.760]  How do you get to the Fed?
[09:51.760 --> 09:56.440]  You're claiming an ongoing criminal conspiracy?
[09:56.440 --> 10:05.920]  1983 deprivation of rights because, you know, violation of amendment 4, 5, 6, 7, you know,
[10:05.920 --> 10:13.160]  and through the kangaroo court and I had filed a motion to dismiss to make a judicial
[10:13.160 --> 10:21.240]  document, get out of the administrative and they wouldn't have it.
[10:21.240 --> 10:27.800]  Well, they just, you expect the court to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[10:27.800 --> 10:28.800]  That you expect.
[10:28.800 --> 10:30.800]  You don't care about that.
[10:30.800 --> 10:35.920]  Your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal and that's why I
[10:35.920 --> 10:41.800]  was considering going to the trial court, to the state court first, but since you're not
[10:41.800 --> 10:48.920]  in Massachusetts, that will be very inconvenient so the federal may be more convenient for
[10:48.920 --> 10:49.920]  you.
[10:49.920 --> 10:54.240]  So, my question about the bill of attainer, I mean, that's basically what the ticket
[10:54.240 --> 10:55.240]  is.
[10:55.240 --> 10:56.240]  It's a bill of attainer.
[10:56.240 --> 11:01.720]  So, my question is, what did I put down?
[11:01.720 --> 11:06.880]  Why does the Massachusetts government behave as though bills of attainer are constitutional
[11:06.880 --> 11:10.320]  when these acts are outlawed by the supreme law of the land?
[11:10.320 --> 11:16.320]  How do you get to a traffic ticket being attainer?
[11:16.320 --> 11:18.920]  As an attainer.
[11:18.920 --> 11:23.480]  Because, all right, so the definition of an attainer is it's an act of a legislative
[11:23.480 --> 11:29.360]  body naming a described individual group of people or entities imposing a pain or penalty
[11:29.360 --> 11:34.240]  without first consulting a jury for authority.
[11:34.240 --> 11:41.600]  So, punishments, it names someone.
[11:41.600 --> 11:42.600]  Okay.
[11:42.600 --> 11:45.320]  Did they deny you a trial?
[11:45.320 --> 11:52.960]  Well, in that state, you have to pay $25 to the registry of motor vehicles to initiate
[11:52.960 --> 11:56.040]  a case in the administrative court.
[11:56.040 --> 11:59.240]  So, I have to pay $25.
[11:59.240 --> 12:01.400]  They filed a citation against you.
[12:01.400 --> 12:04.160]  Did that not initiate a case?
[12:04.160 --> 12:06.440]  Not in Massachusetts.
[12:06.440 --> 12:12.080]  You have to pay, if you want to contest it, you have to pay $25 for an administrative
[12:12.080 --> 12:16.400]  hearing in a case through court.
[12:16.400 --> 12:19.720]  You're claiming that $25 is a bill of attainer.
[12:19.720 --> 12:26.800]  Yes, and also the citation because on the side of the road, an executive determined
[12:26.800 --> 12:33.760]  that I had a, how can an executive make a judicial decision, you know, that separate
[12:33.760 --> 12:34.760]  the...
[12:34.760 --> 12:35.760]  They don't.
[12:35.760 --> 12:38.560]  That's not how that works.
[12:38.560 --> 12:46.920]  He did not do that in his capacity as a officer of the executive department of government.
[12:46.920 --> 12:50.000]  He gave notice of crime in his capacity as a citizen.
[12:50.000 --> 12:58.360]  There is no special authority for policemen to write criminal complaints.
[12:58.360 --> 13:04.020]  Their writing of a criminal complaint is giving notice of crime and they do that in their
[13:04.020 --> 13:07.200]  capacity as a citizen in a republic.
[13:07.200 --> 13:10.000]  You have the same power to do that they do.
[13:10.000 --> 13:17.440]  So, they're giving notice and federal law requires a preliminary hearing based on that
[13:17.440 --> 13:28.440]  notice and a magistrate will look at the probable cause and make a determination if sufficient
[13:28.440 --> 13:36.040]  cause exists to pursue prosecution and it is the magistrate who initiates the prosecution
[13:36.040 --> 13:37.240]  not the peace officer.
[13:37.240 --> 13:38.240]  He just gives notice.
[13:38.240 --> 13:39.240]  Right.
[13:39.240 --> 13:46.800]  That's what I thought I was saying and so he didn't consult with a magistrate to make
[13:46.800 --> 13:52.800]  the determination that I should get that he had probable cause to give me a citation.
[13:52.800 --> 13:57.360]  He doesn't have to consult before he gives you the citation.
[13:57.360 --> 14:04.200]  That's just giving you notice that he's filing a complaint.
[14:04.200 --> 14:09.160]  You're making arguments that won't go anywhere.
[14:09.160 --> 14:12.400]  Officers are authorized to issue traffic citations by statute.
[14:12.400 --> 14:18.400]  You may not agree with it but so long as it is in the law and has not been overturned
[14:18.400 --> 14:23.000]  or ruled unconstitutional, then it has the effective law.
[14:23.000 --> 14:30.520]  Okay, then, but isn't he supposed to be responsible for commerce and not travelers and privates?
[14:30.520 --> 14:32.720]  That's a different issue.
[14:32.720 --> 14:35.440]  You're causing a crime.
[14:35.440 --> 14:37.040]  That is a different issue.
[14:37.040 --> 14:41.320]  You can address that issue but that's different.
[14:41.320 --> 14:46.560]  He can write the citation and that was one of the questions I was going to go to.
[14:46.560 --> 14:53.040]  Did the citation include the element of commerce?
[14:53.040 --> 14:57.640]  Well he indicated that my car was non-commercial.
[14:57.640 --> 15:09.640]  Okay, then you should challenge the sufficiency of the complaint as void on its face.
[15:09.640 --> 15:19.280]  What does Massachusetts transportation code say about that?
[15:19.280 --> 15:27.360]  Is the Massachusetts transportation code substantive law or is it a professional conduct
[15:27.360 --> 15:33.200]  code?
[15:33.200 --> 15:40.160]  Reading the definitions is all messed up.
[15:40.160 --> 15:44.680]  They've contorted the language so you can't take it.
[15:44.680 --> 15:49.920]  Yes, I have noticed that Massachusetts law is a mess.
[15:49.920 --> 15:55.640]  Every time I've tried to figure something out like this statute on assault that says
[15:55.640 --> 16:03.040]  if you commit assault, well that doesn't help because it doesn't define what assault is.
[16:03.040 --> 16:12.000]  Texas law says if you use offensive language or offensive touching, that amounts to assault.
[16:12.000 --> 16:13.400]  But Massachusetts doesn't say that.
[16:13.400 --> 16:16.880]  So yeah, there's a problem with that.
[16:16.880 --> 16:27.160]  But if you're issued a license in Massachusetts, see if there's case law similar to what I found
[16:27.160 --> 16:28.880]  in Tennessee.
[16:28.880 --> 16:35.200]  In Tennessee they have case law that says that the state has a vested interest in safety
[16:35.200 --> 16:37.600]  on the highways.
[16:37.600 --> 16:48.960]  So they can require that every driver on a state or public highway have a driver's license
[16:48.960 --> 16:55.480]  for the purpose of showing competence in operating the vehicle and knowledge of the rules of
[16:55.480 --> 16:56.480]  the road.
[16:56.480 --> 16:57.480]  Hang on.
[16:57.480 --> 19:46.480]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[19:46.480 --> 19:55.480]  Okay.
[19:55.480 --> 19:56.480]  We are back.
[19:56.480 --> 20:03.160]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Nancy in Pennsylvania.
[20:03.160 --> 20:11.000]  I'm trying to establish claims.
[20:11.000 --> 20:14.840]  Were you on a state or federal highway?
[20:14.840 --> 20:17.840]  Like you're going on an interstate or something?
[20:17.840 --> 20:20.840]  Oh, it was the state.
[20:20.840 --> 20:24.840]  Oh, so you weren't on the Pennsylvania Turnpike.
[20:24.840 --> 20:25.840]  Okay.
[20:25.840 --> 20:26.840]  That puts you...
[20:26.840 --> 20:27.840]  Yeah.
[20:27.840 --> 20:35.800]  I thought of raising the question, if I'm on a federal highway, is a federal highway
[20:35.800 --> 20:41.520]  in this state or is it in the Fed?
[20:41.520 --> 20:48.760]  These regularly regulate traffic on federal highways, but that doesn't mean they necessarily
[20:48.760 --> 20:53.520]  have authority on them, but that's an arcane argument.
[20:53.520 --> 21:01.760]  In this case, what is the issue that you want to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint
[21:01.760 --> 21:05.000]  itself?
[21:05.000 --> 21:16.320]  We were talking about whether or not the traffic law, or the license was a commercial
[21:16.320 --> 21:26.120]  license in Pennsylvania or in Massachusetts, do you know?
[21:26.120 --> 21:27.120]  My license?
[21:27.120 --> 21:28.120]  Yeah.
[21:28.120 --> 21:42.560]  Do you know if it's a commercial statute, if it's a commercial license, is the transportation
[21:42.560 --> 21:49.400]  code a professional conduct code?
[21:49.400 --> 21:55.160]  Like the plumbing code or the building code, in Texas we've got plumbing code, building
[21:55.160 --> 22:03.280]  code, electrician code, code for prosecutors, I mean, for psychiatrists and medical doctors
[22:03.280 --> 22:07.320]  and for professional drivers.
[22:07.320 --> 22:16.440]  That driver's license is a professional driver's license, and that requires as an element of
[22:16.440 --> 22:24.640]  any crime, the element of commerce must be established, planned and proved.
[22:24.640 --> 22:26.760]  Is that the case in Massachusetts?
[22:26.760 --> 22:30.200]  Yeah, I don't know.
[22:30.200 --> 22:34.520]  Did you know that?
[22:34.520 --> 22:43.040]  And the policeman writing the citation, that's going to be well adjudicated.
[22:43.040 --> 22:51.640]  The one thing I see you have is a guy raising his voice while he's wearing a gun.
[22:51.640 --> 22:58.640]  That goes to aggravated assault.
[22:58.640 --> 23:08.640]  I'm trying to think how we get that to the Fed.
[23:08.640 --> 23:09.640]  Problem is...
[23:09.640 --> 23:13.840]  So you're saying that that's all there is to this, so all the deprivation of rights,
[23:13.840 --> 23:19.840]  like the amendment four, you didn't, amendment five, none of that matters, I, that would
[23:19.840 --> 23:20.840]  you...
[23:20.840 --> 23:21.840]  Okay.
[23:21.840 --> 23:25.320]  How did he violate amendment four?
[23:25.320 --> 23:27.360]  Privacy of Payton?
[23:27.360 --> 23:35.440]  Well, asking for, he had no probable cause, he did not witness any crime, so why is he
[23:35.440 --> 23:36.440]  arresting me?
[23:36.440 --> 23:38.840]  Why is he stopping me?
[23:38.840 --> 23:46.560]  Is a violation of the traffic laws in Massachusetts a crime?
[23:46.560 --> 23:52.160]  Well, mine was put under civil, not a crime.
[23:52.160 --> 24:05.960]  Well, okay, is he authorized to make a stop for a civil infraction?
[24:05.960 --> 24:11.400]  I assume for commerce and for travelers in private, they have to be committing a crime
[24:11.400 --> 24:12.400]  or about to...
[24:12.400 --> 24:16.920]  Okay, we don't get to do that.
[24:16.920 --> 24:21.160]  Here we have a rule, never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[24:21.160 --> 24:28.440]  It's not what you think it should be, it's what the law says it is.
[24:28.440 --> 24:35.800]  When you're speaking to a judge, we have a case, Walker v. Packer, it says a judge has
[24:35.800 --> 24:43.600]  no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts.
[24:43.600 --> 24:48.760]  That's his job, that's what he does.
[24:48.760 --> 24:54.480]  The only thing he can do is develop the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[24:54.480 --> 24:59.840]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[24:59.840 --> 25:04.240]  That's his judicial capacity, everything else he does is just administrative, setting
[25:04.240 --> 25:08.920]  hearings, convening hearings, all that's administrative stuff.
[25:08.920 --> 25:15.400]  What he does as a judge is determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[25:15.400 --> 25:19.120]  apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[25:19.120 --> 25:26.720]  You can give him the greatest and most convincing arguments as to why he should not rule against
[25:26.720 --> 25:27.720]  you.
[25:27.720 --> 25:36.280]  But if you give him no facts and no law, he has nothing to rule on.
[25:36.280 --> 25:43.600]  I once sat in a mock trial in Massachusetts, as a matter of fact, in Worcester, Massachusetts.
[25:43.600 --> 25:52.880]  The guy was a patriot, and he had a friend helping him bring all these patriot issues.
[25:52.880 --> 26:00.280]  This was a mock trial, and Pennsylvania had come after him for filing liens against Pennsylvania
[26:00.280 --> 26:01.280]  officials.
[26:01.280 --> 26:08.200]  They were up here telling me all this patriot stuff, saying, okay, that's all well and good,
[26:08.200 --> 26:14.600]  but show me law, show me facts, and show me the law that applies to those facts, because
[26:14.600 --> 26:15.600]  that's all I can see.
[26:15.600 --> 26:23.400]  Yeah, well, last time we had a conversation, it was all, last time I called, you said to
[26:23.400 --> 26:32.200]  capture all the lack of due process that happened, and that's the lawsuit right there, and yeah.
[26:32.200 --> 26:37.800]  That's where I was trying to get to, the difference between what you think he should do and what
[26:37.800 --> 26:39.520]  the law commands him to do.
[26:39.520 --> 26:40.960]  That's the only thing we can deal with.
[26:40.960 --> 26:52.040]  So what was he commanded to do when he had reason to believe that a traffic law had been
[26:52.040 --> 26:57.080]  violated and you had violated that law?
[26:57.080 --> 27:05.480]  He was standing outside his cruiser on the side of the road, and flagged me down as I
[27:05.480 --> 27:06.480]  approached.
[27:06.480 --> 27:08.480]  So I guess he had some kind of- Okay.
[27:08.480 --> 27:13.760]  Instructions, and he accused me of speeding, so.
[27:13.760 --> 27:14.760]  Okay.
[27:14.760 --> 27:21.000]  Is there a statute in Massachusetts that makes it a civil infraction to exceed the posted
[27:21.000 --> 27:23.040]  speed limit?
[27:23.040 --> 27:26.600]  Apparently.
[27:26.600 --> 27:31.080]  So did he have reason to believe, did he indicate that he had reason to believe that
[27:31.080 --> 27:34.200]  he observed you exceeding the speed limit?
[27:34.200 --> 27:36.920]  No, he just screamed at me.
[27:36.920 --> 27:42.600]  And I stopped, I opened my window, and he said, Driver's License Registration Insurance,
[27:42.600 --> 27:45.840]  please, do you know why I stopped you?
[27:45.840 --> 27:46.840]  Okay.
[27:46.840 --> 27:50.720]  And then I said, am I being detained?
[27:50.720 --> 27:54.480]  And he said, roll your window, I can't hear you, roll your window down.
[27:54.480 --> 27:58.360]  I rolled it down a little more, I said, am I being detained?
[27:58.360 --> 28:04.800]  And all of a sudden he screamed, roll that window all the way down, or I'm going to surround
[28:04.800 --> 28:07.360]  your car with choopers.
[28:07.360 --> 28:10.760]  That's, I'd call that aggravated assault.
[28:10.760 --> 28:16.600]  Right, but I had no proof of that because I didn't record it, so I was going after the
[28:16.600 --> 28:21.400]  lack of due process and- That doesn't matter, okay, it doesn't matter if you record it or
[28:21.400 --> 28:27.240]  not, you just claim it, and he's likely to say that the reason he raised his voice is
[28:27.240 --> 28:34.920]  you didn't roll the window all the way down, and then you're going to objection relevance.
[28:34.920 --> 28:38.840]  Where is the law that requires me to roll my window down?
[28:38.840 --> 28:48.600]  Now you are required, if you have signed a contract to secure a Driver's License, you
[28:48.600 --> 28:57.720]  now have the capacity to operate in commerce, but just because you can does not mean that
[28:57.720 --> 29:05.720]  you are, however, when you signed that contract to secure that license, in part of the contract,
[29:05.720 --> 29:10.280]  you agreed to present that license on demand.
[29:10.280 --> 29:24.640]  That's not constitutional, that is contractual.
[29:24.640 --> 29:29.160]  That's- You have to deal with that issue, you have to deal with all of it, so he can
[29:29.160 --> 29:33.880]  ask for it, and you're required to get it, you give it to him.
[29:33.880 --> 29:41.120]  He doesn't necessarily tell you exactly how you're to give it to him, and you claim that
[29:41.120 --> 29:46.120]  you wonder where you went all the way down because he would claim that he smelled marijuana,
[29:46.120 --> 29:51.800]  you didn't trust him, and he was agitated so you were frightened for your health and
[29:51.800 --> 29:52.800]  your safety.
[29:52.800 --> 30:01.160]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[30:01.160 --> 30:05.600]  Everybody knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.600 --> 30:07.720]  could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:07.720 --> 30:12.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication
[30:12.920 --> 30:14.640]  in just a moment.
[30:14.640 --> 30:16.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.240 --> 30:20.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:20.640 --> 30:24.600]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.600 --> 30:30.200]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.200 --> 30:32.360]  It's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.360 --> 30:36.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:36.680 --> 30:40.200]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.200 --> 30:43.480]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.480 --> 30:47.880]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:47.880 --> 30:52.480]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter
[30:52.480 --> 30:55.680]  per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:55.680 --> 31:00.120]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[31:00.120 --> 31:04.800]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy
[31:04.800 --> 31:07.160]  as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.160 --> 31:10.440]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:10.440 --> 31:12.960]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:12.960 --> 31:16.800]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes.
[31:16.800 --> 31:20.960]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:20.960 --> 31:27.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:50.960 --> 32:05.960]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:05.960 --> 32:06.960]  Word?
[32:06.960 --> 32:12.200]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[32:12.200 --> 32:18.600]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:18.600 --> 32:23.160]  Ready to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[32:23.160 --> 32:25.560]  dividing the Word of Truth.
[32:25.560 --> 32:29.560]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[32:29.560 --> 32:32.840]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[32:32.840 --> 32:37.480]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:37.480 --> 32:39.880]  and Christian character development.
[32:39.880 --> 32:44.400]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.400 --> 32:48.720]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:48.720 --> 32:50.960]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:50.960 --> 32:57.400]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire
[32:57.400 --> 33:02.400]  and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:02.400 --> 33:19.400]  Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:19.400 --> 33:48.400]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton and Brett Fountain, with LogosRadio and we're talking
[33:48.400 --> 33:49.400]  to Nancy in Pennsylvania.
[33:49.400 --> 33:51.400]  Nancy, I'm not trying to be difficult.
[33:51.400 --> 34:01.040]  Yeah, well, I don't want to focus on his behavior so much as the amendments, because when he
[34:01.040 --> 34:05.800]  forced me to hand over my documents, he had no probable cause.
[34:05.800 --> 34:14.400]  Well, if he claimed probable cause, if he had reason to believe you were speeding, and
[34:14.400 --> 34:22.400]  that is a civil infraction in Massachusetts, and you were a licensed driver who entered
[34:22.400 --> 34:31.840]  into a contract with Pennsylvania, and Pennsylvania has a reciprocity agreement with Massachusetts,
[34:31.840 --> 34:35.920]  then you were required to produce your papers by contract.
[34:35.920 --> 34:47.040]  Well, that's not a contract I agreed to, I didn't agree to be arrested for lack of probable
[34:47.040 --> 34:49.160]  cause.
[34:49.160 --> 34:50.160]  That's different.
[34:50.160 --> 34:53.160]  You're switching issues.
[34:53.160 --> 34:57.000]  That's not about being arrested for lack of probable cause.
[34:57.000 --> 35:04.840]  That's about whether or not you agree to produce your driver's license on demand, and the statute
[35:04.840 --> 35:11.280]  doesn't address probable cause in the contract, it says you agree to produce your license
[35:11.280 --> 35:12.280]  on demand.
[35:12.280 --> 35:13.520]  I do that to policemen.
[35:13.520 --> 35:16.200]  So what's the purpose then?
[35:16.200 --> 35:20.080]  They have an ID.
[35:20.080 --> 35:26.160]  When I ask them to identify themselves and they don't, then I charge them for violating
[35:26.160 --> 35:33.680]  Open Records Act.
[35:33.680 --> 35:44.880]  I got bit by a spider in jail, a brown recluse, still giving me some throat issues, but I'm
[35:44.880 --> 35:51.520]  trying to focus on issues that you can actually adjudicate, they won't just get blown out.
[35:51.520 --> 35:57.760]  I'm doing the mock trial thing again, I'm playing the part of the judge and the prosecutor.
[35:57.760 --> 36:05.320]  All right, but then I don't have any federal case then, it sounds like.
[36:05.320 --> 36:13.960]  Every state has in their driver's license application, they covenant wherein you agree
[36:13.960 --> 36:18.400]  to produce the driver's license on demand.
[36:18.400 --> 36:20.560]  So you won't win that one.
[36:20.560 --> 36:27.240]  I know there are a lot of guys out there pushing that, but they haven't done their homework.
[36:27.240 --> 36:39.520]  I don't want to ask a question that they can answer, I want to ask them hard questions.
[36:39.520 --> 36:51.840]  When he used loud and abusive language, okay, we have in Texas disorderly conduct.
[36:51.840 --> 36:59.600]  If you use loud or offensive language, that would cause an immediate reaction that can
[36:59.600 --> 37:08.920]  be construed as disorderly conduct, and that better fits his behavior.
[37:08.920 --> 37:23.160]  Have you looked up, you might look up disorderly conduct from Massachusetts?
[37:23.160 --> 37:26.280]  Okay, but how is this related to a federal court?
[37:26.280 --> 37:27.280]  It isn't, right?
[37:27.280 --> 37:34.520]  No, I haven't found a way to a federal court yet.
[37:34.520 --> 37:40.480]  So other people I've listened to have said, taught that tickets are bills of attainder,
[37:40.480 --> 37:44.920]  and when you apply like Carl Miller's constitutional law.
[37:44.920 --> 37:52.000]  Carl Miller's, look, that's Patriot, Carl Miller makes me nuts because I wind up going
[37:52.000 --> 37:56.040]  and getting people out of jail following Carl Miller.
[37:56.040 --> 38:00.280]  Carl Miller talks about how he thinks the law ought to be.
[38:00.280 --> 38:01.640]  I can't do that.
[38:01.640 --> 38:08.800]  I don't get to make proactive statement of law out of my own mouth.
[38:08.800 --> 38:13.640]  I have to make proactive statement of law out of the mouth of the legislature or the
[38:13.640 --> 38:16.160]  courts.
[38:16.160 --> 38:20.680]  So I listened to Carl Miller, he's saying, oh, you can do this, you can do that, you
[38:20.680 --> 38:24.920]  can do the other, and I say, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[38:24.920 --> 38:29.560]  Don't tell me that out of your mouth, tell me that out of the mouth of the legislature
[38:29.560 --> 38:30.560]  or courts.
[38:30.560 --> 38:38.400]  I'm going to go into the Justice of the Peace Office and I say, I want to see all warrants
[38:38.400 --> 38:46.560]  that have been issued and executed in accordance with your duty under 15.16 Texas Code of
[38:46.560 --> 38:54.400]  Criminal Procedure, and never make that request out of my own mouth.
[38:54.400 --> 39:00.840]  I never say that this officer did this thing wrong.
[39:00.840 --> 39:06.360]  I'm working on a lawsuit now and I've got a lot of stuff I accuse of doing wrong.
[39:06.360 --> 39:13.240]  And I accuse one of improperly holding an office because the officer failed to enter
[39:13.240 --> 39:21.920]  into a proper contract by swearing to an oath of office and therefore must be removed from
[39:21.920 --> 39:30.680]  office under a co-warrant to action under Texas Torture and Remedies 56A.
[39:30.680 --> 39:35.560]  There always the law or case.
[39:35.560 --> 39:41.920]  Officer arrested the person, did not take them directly to the nearest magistrate as
[39:41.920 --> 39:48.360]  required by Heath v. Boyd, and a quote from what Heath v. Boyd says about it, not what
[39:48.360 --> 39:49.560]  I said about it.
[39:49.560 --> 39:52.160]  Does that make any sense?
[39:52.160 --> 39:57.240]  Yeah, I understand what you're saying about always use the law and that's what I thought
[39:57.240 --> 39:58.240]  I was doing.
[39:58.240 --> 40:06.040]  And when you look at Massachusetts rules of procedure for civil and criminal, the whole
[40:06.040 --> 40:14.760]  racket does not of private, I mean of road pirates do not follow civil or criminal procedures.
[40:14.760 --> 40:16.760]  They just do what they're going to do.
[40:16.760 --> 40:19.000]  Well, that's for you.
[40:19.000 --> 40:27.040]  You catch them doing something that the law does not specifically authorize them to do.
[40:27.040 --> 40:38.080]  Where in Massachusetts code does it authorize a peace officer to commit disorderly conduct
[40:38.080 --> 40:40.920]  against you?
[40:40.920 --> 40:45.560]  Well, this is a state trooper, so not a peace officer.
[40:45.560 --> 40:46.560]  Who cares what he is?
[40:46.560 --> 40:51.640]  Well, he's a public official, whoever he is, but where's he authorized to commit official
[40:51.640 --> 40:55.440]  misconduct or assault?
[40:55.440 --> 41:03.360]  He's got to come up with it, charge him with it, but charge him with code.
[41:03.360 --> 41:07.760]  I don't charge him with an idea, bill of attainder.
[41:07.760 --> 41:13.760]  You got to look at bill of attainder really carefully, bill of attainder is what they
[41:13.760 --> 41:22.600]  did before the revolution, where they passed a new law and made the law retroactive and
[41:22.600 --> 41:27.680]  penal someone for violating the law that didn't exist at the time they violated it.
[41:27.680 --> 41:31.200]  That was a bill of attainder.
[41:31.200 --> 41:33.400]  And they forbid that.
[41:33.400 --> 41:40.320]  Now, Massachusetts charging you to defend yourself from a prosecution.
[41:40.320 --> 41:42.000]  That is another issue.
[41:42.000 --> 41:49.920]  And that's one that either should be brought to the Fed or has been, and there are some
[41:49.920 --> 41:52.760]  rulings on it.
[41:52.760 --> 41:57.440]  That one will get you in the Fed.
[41:57.440 --> 42:11.920]  Yeah, and again, when you file a motion to dismiss the special appearance and you claim
[42:11.920 --> 42:20.600]  this, you state there's no jurisdiction and there's no claim for relief.
[42:20.600 --> 42:27.640]  Okay, it's not enough to state that there's no jurisdiction.
[42:27.640 --> 42:30.200]  You must show how there's no jurisdiction.
[42:30.200 --> 42:31.200]  Well, I did.
[42:31.200 --> 42:37.560]  I wrote a whole, Brad helped me write a motion to dismiss that did that.
[42:37.560 --> 42:42.960]  Did, did the court rule on each issue brought in your motion?
[42:42.960 --> 42:43.960]  They wouldn't allow me.
[42:43.960 --> 42:51.960]  I tried and tried to get a motion scheduled, and they just did all the kangaroo tactics.
[42:51.960 --> 42:52.960]  So that's that.
[42:52.960 --> 42:57.680]  Okay, that goes to a petition for rid of mandamus.
[42:57.680 --> 43:02.480]  Are you familiar with the rid of mandate?
[43:02.480 --> 43:05.680]  Well, I've heard of them.
[43:05.680 --> 43:11.520]  The rid of mandate is where you petition a higher court to order a lower court to do
[43:11.520 --> 43:14.200]  what the law commands them to do.
[43:14.200 --> 43:22.480]  And since this, this is a traffic issue, most likely you would petition the county court,
[43:22.480 --> 43:30.240]  the first level of court that's presided over by a someone who had to have a bar card before
[43:30.240 --> 43:32.200]  he could run for office.
[43:32.200 --> 43:37.640]  The ones that don't require that are called infuriated courts.
[43:37.640 --> 43:40.320]  Does that make sense?
[43:40.320 --> 43:46.840]  This happened, this happened 2021, so I don't.
[43:46.840 --> 43:47.840]  That's okay.
[43:47.840 --> 43:48.840]  It's still ongoing.
[43:48.840 --> 43:49.840]  Hang on.
[43:49.840 --> 44:00.440]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[44:00.440 --> 44:05.040]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[44:05.040 --> 44:06.440]  of nutrition.
[44:06.440 --> 44:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.200 --> 44:16.920]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:16.920 --> 44:22.280]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[44:22.280 --> 44:25.720]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.720 --> 44:30.360]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[44:30.360 --> 44:31.360]  we reject.
[44:31.360 --> 44:38.000]  We have come to trust Youngjevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones,
[44:38.000 --> 44:39.920]  Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.920 --> 44:45.840]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:45.840 --> 44:47.480]  quality radio.
[44:47.480 --> 44:51.800]  As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.800 --> 44:57.040]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:57.040 --> 44:59.000]  increase your income.
[44:59.000 --> 45:01.000]  You're now.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.240 --> 45:10.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, four-CD
[45:10.240 --> 45:14.760]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:14.760 --> 45:18.760]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.760 --> 45:23.440]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.440 --> 45:28.680]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.680 --> 45:34.640]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.640 --> 45:39.080]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.080 --> 45:43.480]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.480 --> 45:49.640]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.640 --> 45:52.200]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.200 --> 46:00.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.200 --> 46:33.320]  Yeah, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for, when I'm hungry I like to know just what
[46:33.320 --> 46:42.200]  I'm fishing for, I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton, I'm just here
[46:42.200 --> 46:52.600]  making my living, pushing buttons, I get my message out, do anyone in shot and distance,
[46:52.600 --> 46:59.960]  I'm hold for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance, first I'm crawling.
[46:59.960 --> 47:02.760]  Okay, we are back.
[47:02.760 --> 47:08.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we're talking Nancy in Pennsylvania.
[47:08.120 --> 47:13.080]  I'm not just talking to you, Nancy, I'm really talking to everybody else, we're talking about
[47:13.080 --> 47:19.240]  how to frame issues that we can adjudicate in court and how to get them done.
[47:19.240 --> 47:24.760]  If you filed a subject matter jurisdiction challenge, that's a big deal.
[47:24.760 --> 47:31.840]  And if the court did anything before they heard the subject matter jurisdiction challenge,
[47:31.840 --> 47:35.880]  that should get official misconduct against the judge.
[47:35.880 --> 47:38.760]  I filed criminal complaint.
[47:38.760 --> 47:41.560]  Who did you file them with?
[47:41.560 --> 47:47.320]  That went up to the Chief Supreme Court Justice.
[47:47.320 --> 48:00.120]  What does Massachusetts code say that a magistrate must do when they receive a criminal complaint?
[48:00.120 --> 48:11.640]  Let me explain why I'm going here, this goes to administrative duties and the administrative
[48:11.640 --> 48:22.400]  part of the duty, that action the judge is required by statute to take, that's administrative.
[48:22.400 --> 48:25.880]  And for that, he has no immunity.
[48:25.880 --> 48:33.960]  So in Texas, it says that when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, that is in accordance
[48:33.960 --> 48:40.720]  with 1505, and 1505 lists the requisites of a complaint.
[48:40.720 --> 48:46.000]  The magistrate shall issue a warrant for it.
[48:46.000 --> 48:53.640]  So I send a complaint to a magistrate, verified criminal affidavit, and a covered letter asking
[48:53.640 --> 48:58.800]  the magistrate to initial the cover letter and return it in the stamp self-addressed
[48:58.800 --> 49:01.960]  envelope included.
[49:01.960 --> 49:05.320]  I never got one of those back ever.
[49:05.320 --> 49:13.160]  But when I don't get that back within a week, then I assume that the judge did not perform
[49:13.160 --> 49:18.360]  his duty, or someone, I don't get notified that a warrant was issued, I assume based
[49:18.360 --> 49:23.800]  on the failure to return that document, that the judge did not issue a warrant.
[49:23.800 --> 49:28.640]  Now if I'll criminal charges against the judge and send the judge a tort letter notifying
[49:28.640 --> 49:36.920]  him that I intend to sue him, or her, because the law commanded him her to do a specific
[49:36.920 --> 49:38.600]  thing.
[49:38.600 --> 49:46.320]  It did not give any mitigating circumstances, it commanded them to do that thing, and they
[49:46.320 --> 49:47.880]  didn't do that thing.
[49:47.880 --> 49:55.280]  It's an administrative act and they have no immunity for it.
[49:55.280 --> 49:56.280]  Make sense?
[49:56.280 --> 49:57.280]  Right.
[49:57.280 --> 50:04.440]  Go in there and ask them to do something they're not going to want to do, but they are commanded
[50:04.440 --> 50:05.440]  to do.
[50:05.440 --> 50:14.400]  You filed a petition, a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[50:14.400 --> 50:21.440]  They were required to convene a hearing to hear that challenge before they pursued, before
[50:21.440 --> 50:29.520]  they went any further, and that is absolutely going to be in Massachusetts law.
[50:29.520 --> 50:33.800]  Jurisdiction is presumed until it is challenged.
[50:33.800 --> 50:39.240]  Once it's challenged, it's no longer presumed, and the prosecution or the opposing party
[50:39.240 --> 50:43.160]  must prove up jurisdiction.
[50:43.160 --> 50:49.720]  That's a good one to go after them with, and go ahead and file criminal charges against
[50:49.720 --> 50:56.360]  the judge for impersonating a judicial officer, because to the degree he has not proved up
[50:56.360 --> 51:02.400]  jurisdiction, he has vacated the bench.
[51:02.400 --> 51:09.120]  So you file him against him for proficient misconduct, impersonating a judicial officer,
[51:09.120 --> 51:14.920]  and then you petition the court of appeals or the county court, whichever one is required
[51:14.920 --> 51:25.840]  in Massachusetts, for a writ of mandamus, ordering the judge to do what the law commands
[51:25.840 --> 51:30.800]  him to do, but when he failed to do it, he committed the crime.
[51:30.800 --> 51:32.800]  That's a fait accompli.
[51:32.800 --> 51:40.160]  You don't have to, you can still have him ordered to issue the, to set the hearing,
[51:40.160 --> 51:44.600]  but you can also disqualify him for cause now that you file criminal charges against
[51:44.600 --> 51:47.680]  him.
[51:47.680 --> 51:49.680]  Am I making sense?
[51:49.680 --> 51:53.920]  Well, I have to figure all that out.
[51:53.920 --> 51:58.400]  I don't know what, I've never done a writ of mandamus, so.
[51:58.400 --> 51:59.400]  Okay.
[51:59.400 --> 52:00.640]  Just look, look it up.
[52:00.640 --> 52:02.240]  It's not that complicated.
[52:02.240 --> 52:09.640]  The most courts do require a special heading, uh, appellate courts have a different heading
[52:09.640 --> 52:16.880]  style than the state court, than the district courts, and generally they require, um, table
[52:16.880 --> 52:20.240]  of contents and a table of authorities.
[52:20.240 --> 52:24.360]  Do you use Microsoft Word?
[52:24.360 --> 52:25.600]  Yeah.
[52:25.600 --> 52:34.400]  Then look up how to do table of authorities, you hit the insert key, and, uh, oh no, I
[52:34.400 --> 52:36.600]  think it'll be under the development key.
[52:36.600 --> 52:45.280]  If you don't see the development key, you go into the menu section, you hit the, uh,
[52:45.280 --> 52:55.280]  the little emblem next to the file button, let's see, where's it at, it's, uh, you hit
[52:55.280 --> 53:04.600]  file, and go down to options, and then hit advanced, and there'll be a place in there
[53:04.600 --> 53:13.000]  to show developer on the menu bar, then you hit the developer, and you know, it starts
[53:13.000 --> 53:19.480]  out with table of contents, and then it has a section for, uh, table of authorities, and
[53:19.480 --> 53:24.400]  what you do is you go in and everywhere you cite a statute, you select the statute, go
[53:24.400 --> 53:28.960]  up to table of authorities and click on it, and it'll ask you if it's a statute, if it's
[53:28.960 --> 53:37.440]  a case, if it's a treatise, and you pick statute and hit enter, and it sets some hidden code
[53:37.440 --> 53:44.120]  on that, and when you're done, then you insert table of contents, and it'll go down and read
[53:44.120 --> 53:48.400]  all those and build your table of contents for you.
[53:48.400 --> 53:57.160]  But look at Massachusetts code and what they require for a mandamus, it'll be in the rules.
[53:57.160 --> 54:11.080]  Okay, well, then, um, I guess I don't have a lawsuit, I, I, I, I'm not, I, yeah, you
[54:11.080 --> 54:12.080]  do, yeah, you do.
[54:12.080 --> 54:15.200]  You just don't have the issues that you thought.
[54:15.200 --> 54:22.320]  Uh, he, he raised his voice to you while he was prominently displaying a deadly weapon.
[54:22.320 --> 54:25.400]  That would create an alarm in anyone.
[54:25.400 --> 54:31.800]  Yeah, but I can't go to the state court in Massachusetts, it's just not possible, so.
[54:31.800 --> 54:36.800]  It doesn't, doesn't help us get to Fed.
[54:36.800 --> 54:43.800]  Since you were in the, in the state of Massachusetts, the only thing that might get you fed is on
[54:43.800 --> 54:52.400]  a federal highway, but I'm not sure I doubt that for traffic citations, uh, the subject
[54:52.400 --> 54:59.840]  manager jurisdiction challenge might get you there because he, the judge had a duty to
[54:59.840 --> 55:04.600]  prove up subject manager jurisdiction when he failed to prove up subject manager jurisdiction.
[55:04.600 --> 55:12.680]  He denied you in the due course of the laws and that will ring as a tort in the state
[55:12.680 --> 55:19.480]  or the Fed.
[55:19.480 --> 55:23.840]  You only need one Fed claim to drag all the state claims in with it.
[55:23.840 --> 55:24.840]  Right.
[55:24.840 --> 55:25.840]  Yeah.
[55:25.840 --> 55:33.880]  But I, I'm just confused because, um, you know, and other things, other tests, uh, months,
[55:33.880 --> 55:41.120]  I've learned that, um, I felt like Brett's whole case was, um, he wasn't under commerce
[55:41.120 --> 55:49.520]  and he, and, um, beatings not a crime and, um, he didn't cause any harm.
[55:49.520 --> 55:54.880]  Um, well, how did you get to speeding wasn't a crime?
[55:54.880 --> 55:56.520]  What's that?
[55:56.520 --> 56:01.000]  How did you get to speeding is not a crime in Massachusetts?
[56:01.000 --> 56:07.520]  Um, well, it, it was a civil offense.
[56:07.520 --> 56:09.800]  He wrote it up as a civil.
[56:09.800 --> 56:12.400]  It's a civil infraction.
[56:12.400 --> 56:15.480]  So calling it not a crime is not a helpful.
[56:15.480 --> 56:17.480]  Is it a civil infraction?
[56:17.480 --> 56:18.480]  Okay.
[56:18.480 --> 56:24.840]  Let me, let me explain why they do this in tech, why you can do this in Texas because
[56:24.840 --> 56:31.320]  in the Texas transportation code, there's a chapter on a speed limit signs.
[56:31.320 --> 56:41.480]  And it says speed limit signs are for the, uh, control of commercial traffic.
[56:41.480 --> 56:47.000]  That might not be exactly how it's stated, but it's, it's the space specifically for
[56:47.000 --> 56:51.840]  commercial traffic.
[56:51.840 --> 56:56.480]  Does Massachusetts have something similar before you can go in for you?
[56:56.480 --> 57:03.760]  I got the regulation book and it, the definitions are mumbo jumbo.
[57:03.760 --> 57:09.960]  Um, so it makes no sense and, um, petition for clarification.
[57:09.960 --> 57:17.320]  It's what you challenged the statute as being constitutionally insufficient.
[57:17.320 --> 57:20.840]  They hate constitutional challenges.
[57:20.840 --> 57:29.360]  And look, does Massachusetts have a code construction statute?
[57:29.360 --> 57:37.680]  Oh, wow, this is getting so intense that I, but there's no, what I'm going to, there
[57:37.680 --> 57:42.080]  is a, a mental discipline.
[57:42.080 --> 57:44.000]  This is not hard.
[57:44.000 --> 57:49.520]  You've just been taught to think about it different goes back to never make a proactive
[57:49.520 --> 57:53.040]  statement of law out of your own mouth.
[57:53.040 --> 57:59.880]  Don't say that a traffic ticket is not a crime.
[57:59.880 --> 58:07.080]  Say what it is under Massachusetts law, under Massachusetts law, traffic citation is not
[58:07.080 --> 58:19.440]  a crime under section so and so and so and so it states that infraction is a civil infraction.
[58:19.440 --> 58:21.280]  Do it in terms of the law.
[58:21.280 --> 58:28.300]  Just be careful anytime you make a statement of law without having the statute of case
[58:28.300 --> 58:30.720]  law to explain it.
[58:30.720 --> 58:33.400]  Just specify what it is.
[58:33.400 --> 58:34.400]  Okay.
[58:34.400 --> 58:36.200]  Anything else for us today?
[58:36.200 --> 58:37.840]  No, that's it.
[58:37.840 --> 58:38.840]  Okay.
[58:38.840 --> 58:41.200]  I hope I haven't given you too big a headache.
[58:41.200 --> 58:45.800]  Well, it would, it would, it would, it would lead to me.
[58:45.800 --> 58:46.800]  Hang on.
[58:46.800 --> 58:47.800]  We'll be right back.
[58:47.800 --> 58:48.800]  Okay.
[58:48.800 --> 58:54.320]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.320 --> 58:59.480]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.480 --> 59:00.840]  can really help.
[59:00.840 --> 59:05.160]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.160 --> 59:06.160]  today.
[59:06.160 --> 59:10.200]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.200 --> 59:13.320]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.320 --> 59:18.560]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.560 --> 59:24.200]  Hereby chapter Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.200 --> 59:27.760]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.760 --> 59:32.800]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:32.800 --> 59:45.560]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[59:45.560 --> 59:52.560]  us online at bfa.org.
[59:52.560 --> 01:00:02.160]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.160 --> 01:00:05.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.840 --> 01:00:09.280]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.280 --> 01:00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.840 --> 01:00:14.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:14.680 --> 01:00:17.560]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.560 --> 01:00:19.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.160 --> 01:00:22.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.760 --> 01:00:27.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.520 --> 01:00:28.960]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:28.960 --> 01:00:32.720]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.720 --> 01:00:35.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:00:35.280 --> 01:00:39.600]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:00:39.600 --> 01:00:43.120]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.120 --> 01:00:46.560]  Get over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.560 --> 01:00:48.920]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.920 --> 01:00:52.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.200]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.200 --> 01:00:59.320]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the third amendment
[01:00:59.320 --> 01:01:00.920]  was designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.920 --> 01:01:05.160]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[01:01:05.160 --> 01:01:07.280]  the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.280 --> 01:01:08.960]  Third party, third amendment?
[01:01:08.960 --> 01:01:09.960]  Get it?
[01:01:09.960 --> 01:01:13.480]  Once you're a knock at your door and guys and fatigues demand lodging, tell them to
[01:01:13.480 --> 01:01:16.960]  dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the third amendment.
[01:01:16.960 --> 01:01:18.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.760 --> 01:01:31.960]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.960 --> 01:01:35.640]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.640 --> 01:01:39.080]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.080 --> 01:01:40.520]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.520 --> 01:01:44.440]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.440 --> 01:01:47.440]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:49.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:52.600]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.600 --> 01:01:57.400]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.400 --> 01:01:58.840]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:02.560]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.560 --> 01:02:05.160]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.160 --> 01:02:08.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[01:02:08.680 --> 01:02:12.960]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.960 --> 01:02:16.360]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.360 --> 01:02:22.040]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of X-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.040 --> 01:02:26.520]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable
[01:02:26.520 --> 01:02:28.000]  search and seizure.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  Fourth Amendment?
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:30.400]  Four eyes staring at you?
[01:02:30.400 --> 01:02:31.400]  Get it?
[01:02:31.400 --> 01:02:34.320]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of
[01:02:34.320 --> 01:02:40.000]  security, case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:46.840]  it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:46.840 --> 01:02:50.600]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their
[01:02:50.600 --> 01:02:53.240]  googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.240 --> 01:02:55.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.200 --> 01:03:08.720]  For more news and information, at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:08.720 --> 01:03:36.720]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:36.720 --> 01:03:44.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we're finishing up with Nancy
[01:03:44.120 --> 01:03:46.120]  in Pennsylvania.
[01:03:46.120 --> 01:03:54.200]  Nancy, you could throw a lot of stuff at them and they'll trash most of it, but if we're
[01:03:54.200 --> 01:04:03.720]  going to be effective, we need to get through these initial basics.
[01:04:03.720 --> 01:04:11.520]  Excuse me, I'm still having this voice issue.
[01:04:11.520 --> 01:04:19.080]  It seems like it affected the, I forget what it's called, the valve between the gullet
[01:04:19.080 --> 01:04:24.680]  and the station tube.
[01:04:24.680 --> 01:04:30.720]  Sometimes liquid goes down into the lungs and I start coughing like crazy.
[01:04:30.720 --> 01:04:34.320]  Okay, price we pay.
[01:04:34.320 --> 01:04:45.440]  Okay, I'm trying to just get a different way of thinking about how we're doing this.
[01:04:45.440 --> 01:04:48.200]  Doing law is different than about anything else.
[01:04:48.200 --> 01:04:56.720]  Here we have special ways we need to do things to get them right and we have to be very pedantic.
[01:04:56.720 --> 01:05:06.440]  I'm sorry we couldn't get more done today.
[01:05:06.440 --> 01:05:09.600]  Think about it and call us back next week.
[01:05:09.600 --> 01:05:10.600]  Okay.
[01:05:10.600 --> 01:05:11.600]  Thank you.
[01:05:11.600 --> 01:05:12.600]  Thank you.
[01:05:12.600 --> 01:05:13.600]  Bye-bye.
[01:05:13.600 --> 01:05:14.600]  Okay.
[01:05:14.600 --> 01:05:23.560]  Excuse my coughing, now we're going to Vinny in Virginia, first time caller.
[01:05:23.560 --> 01:05:27.040]  Hello, Vinny.
[01:05:27.040 --> 01:05:29.800]  Hi, Randy.
[01:05:29.800 --> 01:05:32.160]  What do you have for us today?
[01:05:32.160 --> 01:05:40.200]  Well, I'm calling because I have an issue with my HOA, having my vehicle towed for an
[01:05:40.200 --> 01:05:48.600]  expired safety inspection and so next door to my HOA community is a vacant lot that
[01:05:48.600 --> 01:05:55.400]  is not owned by HOA and since we bought the house, we've known that this lot can be used
[01:05:55.400 --> 01:06:02.520]  as overflow parking and this lot is not just used by my HOA community for overflow parking.
[01:06:02.520 --> 01:06:07.840]  It's also used by other people in the neighborhood, particularly there's a church and they use
[01:06:07.840 --> 01:06:15.560]  it as well as overflow parking and so back in September, my car was parked over there
[01:06:15.560 --> 01:06:23.040]  and within two hours, it was towed for an expired safety inspection and we called tow,
[01:06:23.040 --> 01:06:28.160]  asked tow, why was it towed and they said that it was for expired safety inspection
[01:06:28.160 --> 01:06:36.600]  and that they had authority to tow it from HOA so then we questioned HOA that where did
[01:06:36.600 --> 01:06:43.200]  they get the authority to tow from that vacant lot because my HOA declaration doesn't show
[01:06:43.200 --> 01:06:47.240]  that lot as part of HOA property.
[01:06:47.240 --> 01:06:55.840]  HOA property manager told us that they have authority to tow it because there's an agreement
[01:06:55.840 --> 01:07:03.080]  with the property owner so we said, okay, can we see that agreement and took her a few days,
[01:07:03.080 --> 01:07:09.000]  she emailed back and said, well, we have a working relationship with the property owner
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:16.800]  that we can use it as long as we make sure that the lot doesn't become filled with abandoned
[01:07:16.800 --> 01:07:24.000]  cars and all this stuff and so we said, okay, so is there an agreement and it took her a
[01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:31.600]  while to get back to us and she sent us a deed of easement and the parking policies.
[01:07:31.600 --> 01:07:35.520]  Nothing in the deed of easement mentioned anything about that property being used for
[01:07:35.520 --> 01:07:36.520]  parking.
[01:07:36.520 --> 01:07:40.920]  So we emailed her back and said, you know, thank you for the documents but this has nothing
[01:07:40.920 --> 01:07:43.800]  to do with the issue.
[01:07:43.800 --> 01:07:46.840]  Where's the agreement with the property owner?
[01:07:46.840 --> 01:07:52.920]  Well, she just kept giving us the run around so then eventually we just put in a formal
[01:07:52.920 --> 01:08:00.920]  complaint with our HOA board to go through the complaint process and in that complaint
[01:08:00.920 --> 01:08:11.120]  I accused my property manager of breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, negligent
[01:08:11.120 --> 01:08:18.360]  per se because I went through the property manager regulations and I put it all down
[01:08:18.360 --> 01:08:26.400]  in there and we submitted that and then within two weeks we got a nasty letter from the
[01:08:26.400 --> 01:08:34.640]  HOA attorney pretty much telling us that we had our allegation or baseless cases closed
[01:08:34.640 --> 01:08:42.680]  and HOA has authority over that lot because and this was new information to me, the HOA
[01:08:42.680 --> 01:08:53.160]  attorney said that HOA pays for the law maintenance on that lot and because we pay for the lot
[01:08:53.160 --> 01:09:00.800]  maintenance it's therefore considered common area because of this oral agreement with the
[01:09:00.800 --> 01:09:01.800]  property owner.
[01:09:01.800 --> 01:09:08.120]  So I'm just wondering where can I go from here?
[01:09:08.120 --> 01:09:14.280]  I'd like to hold to accountable, I'd like to hold my HOA accountable but my HOA agreement
[01:09:14.280 --> 01:09:25.520]  has an arbitration clause in there so I kind of feel stuck.
[01:09:25.520 --> 01:09:27.560]  So how my mic got muted?
[01:09:27.560 --> 01:09:31.360]  Oh, I can hear you now.
[01:09:31.360 --> 01:09:40.360]  My bad, I couldn't, I wasn't getting any responses and I think my mic was muted.
[01:09:40.360 --> 01:09:45.560]  What was the last intelligible thing I said?
[01:09:45.560 --> 01:09:51.960]  I didn't hear anything except what do you have for us tonight?
[01:09:51.960 --> 01:09:59.240]  What, it's been muted all this time?
[01:09:59.240 --> 01:10:01.240]  I think so.
[01:10:01.240 --> 01:10:13.920]  Okay, no, I was talking to you earlier, we were talking about the HOA towing your car.
[01:10:13.920 --> 01:10:24.840]  Okay, well, I'll try to add lib, since the HOA, this property doesn't belong in the HOA,
[01:10:24.840 --> 01:10:30.160]  you don't care if the HOA tows it or not, I mean in most yards or not.
[01:10:30.160 --> 01:10:36.560]  If there's nothing in the contract that gives you notice about parking on this property
[01:10:36.560 --> 01:10:44.360]  and the rules, is there any, if there's nothing in the agreement about parking on this property
[01:10:44.360 --> 01:10:48.680]  that's not part of the HOA, then this doesn't fall under the contract.
[01:10:48.680 --> 01:10:53.360]  Yeah, they're saying there's an oral agreement.
[01:10:53.360 --> 01:10:55.400]  Let them make that with the court.
[01:10:55.400 --> 01:10:56.400]  Okay.
[01:10:56.400 --> 01:11:06.800]  Then I'm going to let her notice of intent to sue for conspiring with the towing company
[01:11:06.800 --> 01:11:08.800]  toward extortion.
[01:11:08.800 --> 01:11:09.800]  Okay.
[01:11:09.800 --> 01:11:18.400]  They're authorizing that, they've conspired with the towing company to steal your car
[01:11:18.400 --> 01:11:23.280]  and force you to pay them a certain amount of money to get it back.
[01:11:23.280 --> 01:11:34.120]  Does the parking agreement for the HOA include authorization to tow if the automobile doesn't
[01:11:34.120 --> 01:11:38.240]  have a safety inspection sticker?
[01:11:38.240 --> 01:11:46.920]  It says that it will be towed for expired safety inspection and tags, but with notice,
[01:11:46.920 --> 01:11:49.240]  my car was towed without notice.
[01:11:49.240 --> 01:11:59.640]  Okay, don't go to there for here because you're claiming that property is not within the scope
[01:11:59.640 --> 01:12:03.400]  of your contract.
[01:12:03.400 --> 01:12:10.000]  So accuse them on the towing company of, you want to know all of the tows that were made
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:21.160]  from this lot and essentially craft a tort letter and make a claim in the form of a private
[01:12:21.160 --> 01:12:29.360]  attorney general suit in your behalf and all others similarly situated and send a tort
[01:12:29.360 --> 01:12:40.720]  letter to both the towing company and the HOA or it might be better to just sue the
[01:12:40.720 --> 01:12:41.720]  towing company.
[01:12:41.720 --> 01:12:49.680]  Yeah, I figured that'd be easier because, so how does my arbitration clause work in
[01:12:49.680 --> 01:12:55.240]  here because this is what, okay, so then I don't need to go to that.
[01:12:55.240 --> 01:12:59.440]  This is ultra virus, it's outside the scope of the contract.
[01:12:59.440 --> 01:13:08.240]  Even if you sue the HOA, but really the HOA didn't do anything, the towing company did
[01:13:08.240 --> 01:13:13.840]  and the HOA seems to be covering for the towing company.
[01:13:13.840 --> 01:13:23.440]  So sue the towing company and then let them prove up they had some kind of binding authority
[01:13:23.440 --> 01:13:27.040]  to tow from this particular property.
[01:13:27.040 --> 01:13:29.040]  Okay.
[01:13:29.040 --> 01:13:34.640]  That ought to be fun, put them on the dime.
[01:13:34.640 --> 01:13:35.640]  Yeah.
[01:13:35.640 --> 01:13:40.240]  And you did bar grieve the attorney, didn't you?
[01:13:40.240 --> 01:13:45.440]  I did, I bar grieved and I put in a criminal complaint for a baritry.
[01:13:45.440 --> 01:13:47.120]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:13:47.120 --> 01:13:50.200]  Did you look up baritry in Virginia?
[01:13:50.200 --> 01:13:51.680]  I did.
[01:13:51.680 --> 01:13:54.360]  Oh, they have a good baritry law?
[01:13:54.360 --> 01:13:55.360]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:13:55.360 --> 01:14:01.760]  Who did you give the complaint to?
[01:14:01.760 --> 01:14:10.120]  The criminal complaint I sent to the commonwealth attorney.
[01:14:10.120 --> 01:14:12.120]  Commonwealth attorney or the prosecutor?
[01:14:12.120 --> 01:14:13.120]  Yes.
[01:14:13.120 --> 01:14:16.480]  I guess to be the equivalent of the DA.
[01:14:16.480 --> 01:14:23.400]  Yeah, what does Virginia law say regarding magistrates?
[01:14:23.400 --> 01:14:27.560]  Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side, Randy Kelton, Brett Fouton, Rule of Law
[01:14:27.560 --> 01:14:28.560]  Radio.
[01:14:28.560 --> 01:14:35.080]  We'll give out the calling number, we've got, oh, we've got three seconds left and
[01:14:35.080 --> 01:14:36.080]  two callers.
[01:14:36.080 --> 01:14:39.440]  We'll probably use up the whole thing.
[01:14:39.440 --> 01:14:44.760]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:14:44.760 --> 01:14:48.200]  Call debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras Proven Method.
[01:14:48.200 --> 01:14:52.560]  Michael Mirras has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:53.880]  can win two.
[01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:58.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:14:58.400 --> 01:15:04.160]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:15:04.160 --> 01:15:08.800]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:15:08.800 --> 01:15:13.000]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:18.120]  The Michael Mirras Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:15:18.120 --> 01:15:20.240]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:15:20.240 --> 01:15:25.800]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner
[01:15:25.800 --> 01:15:28.760]  or email [email protected].
[01:15:28.760 --> 01:15:37.760]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:15:37.760 --> 01:15:39.520]  collectors now.
[01:15:39.520 --> 01:15:40.520]  I love logos.
[01:15:40.520 --> 01:15:44.040]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:15:44.040 --> 01:15:46.640]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:15:46.640 --> 01:15:47.880]  I need my truth fix.
[01:15:47.880 --> 01:15:52.520]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:15:52.520 --> 01:15:56.320]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:15:56.320 --> 01:15:59.680]  have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[01:15:59.680 --> 01:16:01.160]  How can I help logos?
[01:16:01.160 --> 01:16:03.200]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:16:03.200 --> 01:16:06.160]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:16:06.160 --> 01:16:08.760]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:16:08.760 --> 01:16:10.880]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:16:10.880 --> 01:16:16.760]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:16:16.760 --> 01:16:22.760]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:16:22.760 --> 01:16:23.760]  Do I pay extra?
[01:16:23.760 --> 01:16:24.760]  No.
[01:16:24.760 --> 01:16:26.760]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:16:26.760 --> 01:16:27.760]  No.
[01:16:27.760 --> 01:16:28.760]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:16:28.760 --> 01:16:29.760]  No.
[01:16:29.760 --> 01:16:30.760]  I mean, yes.
[01:16:30.760 --> 01:16:35.240]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:16:35.240 --> 01:16:36.240]  Thank you so much.
[01:16:36.240 --> 01:16:37.720]  You're welcome.
[01:16:37.720 --> 01:16:39.720]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:16:39.720 --> 01:16:49.720]  This is the LogosRadioNetwork.
[01:16:49.720 --> 01:17:03.720]  Oh, come on.
[01:17:03.720 --> 01:17:05.040]  Okay.
[01:17:05.040 --> 01:17:06.040]  We are back.
[01:17:06.040 --> 01:17:11.440]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Vinny in Virginia.
[01:17:11.440 --> 01:17:14.680]  And yeah, this would be great.
[01:17:14.680 --> 01:17:25.440]  You sue the Tollium Company and sue them for all others similarly situated.
[01:17:25.440 --> 01:17:34.200]  And you could sue the lawyer for malpractice, just add him to the suit.
[01:17:34.200 --> 01:17:42.720]  It's got to be a dollar insurance policy, at least.
[01:17:42.720 --> 01:17:44.480]  It's something I'm shifting gears.
[01:17:44.480 --> 01:17:51.160]  I've been trying to fix the legal system for a long time, and I've tried to use the system
[01:17:51.160 --> 01:17:57.800]  to fix the system first, and that didn't work, so I spent a lot of time trying to use the
[01:17:57.800 --> 01:18:02.320]  criminal laws against the system, and that hasn't gotten it fixed.
[01:18:02.320 --> 01:18:07.240]  So now what I'm doing is suing them personally.
[01:18:07.240 --> 01:18:15.240]  We go in and find a statute that commands them to do a specific thing, like in Texas,
[01:18:15.240 --> 01:18:22.280]  when a complaint is presented to a magistrate, complete the court's 1505, that just says
[01:18:22.280 --> 01:18:27.280]  requisites of a magistrate to magistrate shall issue warrant forthwith.
[01:18:27.280 --> 01:18:32.400]  You want to find duties like that, where they're commanded to do a certain thing, and they
[01:18:32.400 --> 01:18:36.160]  don't do that thing.
[01:18:36.160 --> 01:18:40.840]  There you can always go after them, because if they're commanded to do something, and
[01:18:40.840 --> 01:18:50.200]  they have no discretion, then they also have no immunity.
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:55.280]  You always want to find people who don't have immunity.
[01:18:55.280 --> 01:19:00.560]  And in this case, your lawyer is going to be hanging out there in the wind, because
[01:19:00.560 --> 01:19:13.440]  he lied to you about property over which the HOA had no legal control.
[01:19:13.440 --> 01:19:16.240]  So he's a stranger to the property.
[01:19:16.240 --> 01:19:20.720]  The HOA is a stranger to the property.
[01:19:20.720 --> 01:19:28.840]  So they couldn't contract, even if they got a contract, it's worthless.
[01:19:28.840 --> 01:19:39.200]  Because the only one who had a standing to give anyone permission to park there or to
[01:19:39.200 --> 01:19:46.640]  tow vehicles from there, that would have to be from the property owner.
[01:19:46.640 --> 01:19:48.840]  I'd say you got a pretty good suit.
[01:19:48.840 --> 01:19:56.760]  You want to make it look as ugly and awful and nasty as you can, so that when you get
[01:19:56.760 --> 01:20:03.560]  to mediation, the HOA will say, make this person go away.
[01:20:03.560 --> 01:20:04.560]  Give her some money.
[01:20:04.560 --> 01:20:13.600]  I'm riding a suit against Nordstrom Rack for having a woman attacked by a security officer
[01:20:13.600 --> 01:20:19.360]  because she wasn't wearing a mask, and this is after she called corporate and made sure
[01:20:19.360 --> 01:20:20.800]  she could shop without a mask.
[01:20:20.800 --> 01:20:30.200]  So we're going to sue Nordstrom Rack and send him a tort letter first, so we don't have
[01:20:30.200 --> 01:20:37.920]  to sue him, and send a scathing letter to every better business bureau where Nordstrom
[01:20:37.920 --> 01:20:46.840]  has a facility, everything's politics.
[01:20:46.840 --> 01:20:50.360]  So with yours, you're essentially doing the same thing by looking up the other people
[01:20:50.360 --> 01:21:00.080]  who have been towed, whether they've been towed by as tenants of the HOA, or whether
[01:21:00.080 --> 01:21:06.640]  they were just visitors or anything, they'll have to claim, does that make sense?
[01:21:06.640 --> 01:21:08.440]  Yes, yes.
[01:21:08.440 --> 01:21:16.720]  Now another question, I want to put in a professional conduct complaint against my property manager
[01:21:16.720 --> 01:21:18.480]  against her license.
[01:21:18.480 --> 01:21:21.200]  Can I do that even with this arbitration clause?
[01:21:21.200 --> 01:21:24.640]  Oh, yes, that's totally separate.
[01:21:24.640 --> 01:21:25.640]  Okay.
[01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:34.120]  If she's licensed, and licensing agencies for most professions is, if the licensing
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:44.840]  agency is a government agency, which they normally are, they will hammer these guys.
[01:21:44.840 --> 01:21:48.320]  Okay.
[01:21:48.320 --> 01:21:50.800]  That one would be good.
[01:21:50.800 --> 01:21:55.040]  Okay, do you have anything else for us?
[01:21:55.040 --> 01:21:58.040]  No, that answers my question, that gives me something to work on.
[01:21:58.040 --> 01:22:00.800]  I felt stuck earlier, so thank you.
[01:22:00.800 --> 01:22:02.480]  Okay, good, Vinnie.
[01:22:02.480 --> 01:22:03.480]  Have fun.
[01:22:03.480 --> 01:22:06.720]  Okay, now we're going to Penny in Texas.
[01:22:06.720 --> 01:22:07.720]  Hello, Penny.
[01:22:07.720 --> 01:22:11.880]  Hey, how are you doing, Randy?
[01:22:11.880 --> 01:22:12.880]  Doing good.
[01:22:12.880 --> 01:22:15.280]  What do you have for us today?
[01:22:15.280 --> 01:22:23.600]  Well, I called in because of Jack, and I wanted to let him know first off, he doesn't want
[01:22:23.600 --> 01:22:29.760]  to give, I mean, no pregnant woman should be taken ivermectin, because it's to kill
[01:22:29.760 --> 01:22:31.760]  parasites.
[01:22:31.760 --> 01:22:34.200]  So, it's not going to be a pregnancy.
[01:22:34.200 --> 01:22:37.040]  And it'll consider the fetus a parasite.
[01:22:37.040 --> 01:22:43.160]  Yeah, yeah, yeah, and there's also been a study that popped up recently.
[01:22:43.160 --> 01:22:52.640]  I don't know what the date is from it, I can look it up, but ivermectin was in a study
[01:22:52.640 --> 01:23:01.600]  for infertility, and it was not only affecting female infertility, but also male.
[01:23:01.600 --> 01:23:03.600]  You know, they did a rat.
[01:23:03.600 --> 01:23:08.480]  Hold on, it was effective for infertility.
[01:23:08.480 --> 01:23:10.480]  To eliminate infertility?
[01:23:10.480 --> 01:23:16.040]  No, it was causing infertility in rats.
[01:23:16.040 --> 01:23:17.880]  That's what I want to be sure of.
[01:23:17.880 --> 01:23:28.080]  Yeah, well, a clue to that, too, is when you have a company like Merck who makes ivermectin,
[01:23:28.080 --> 01:23:34.040]  and they're giving it away for free to all the people in Africa, what does that tell
[01:23:34.040 --> 01:23:35.040]  you?
[01:23:35.040 --> 01:23:36.560]  Yeah, that should tell you something.
[01:23:36.560 --> 01:23:41.720]  I know, I had a friend give me ivermectin when the pandemic was going on.
[01:23:41.720 --> 01:23:49.600]  Well, for an adult male, you know, and probably since you're old and decrepit like I am.
[01:23:49.600 --> 01:23:54.320]  I was going to say, it might make me fertile.
[01:23:54.320 --> 01:23:56.320]  Oh my goodness.
[01:23:56.320 --> 01:24:05.240]  No, we're not too worried about our fertility status at this point, I don't think, but anyway.
[01:24:05.240 --> 01:24:07.400]  I got neutered.
[01:24:07.400 --> 01:24:10.080]  Oh, no.
[01:24:10.080 --> 01:24:15.160]  They were operating on me, and I got the nurse on one side, the doctor on the other, and
[01:24:15.160 --> 01:24:21.720]  they're down there pushing and pulling and tugging, and the nurse gets this strange look
[01:24:21.720 --> 01:24:25.120]  on her face, and she looks up at the doctor.
[01:24:25.120 --> 01:24:32.120]  The doctor said, Clamp, wait a minute, what do you mean, Clamp?
[01:24:32.120 --> 01:24:40.400]  Oh, goodness, but anyway, if you want to give Jack, I'm sure you have his email address.
[01:24:40.400 --> 01:24:48.200]  If you want to give him mine, I've got some nice solutions for that problem because he's
[01:24:48.200 --> 01:24:49.200]  worried.
[01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:57.120]  The first, and I'll just go ahead and tell you too, the first thing I would do if I were
[01:24:57.120 --> 01:25:05.920]  her and her husband, I would go to a live blood analysis person, a holistic one.
[01:25:05.920 --> 01:25:11.600]  So she can take a look, here she could take a look at their live blood samples and see
[01:25:11.600 --> 01:25:13.120]  what's going on there.
[01:25:13.120 --> 01:25:24.000]  Now, it's possible that a person who's doing live blood analysis won't have the necessary
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:30.560]  excellent microscope in order to detect nanotechnology because it's very, very small.
[01:25:30.560 --> 01:25:32.560]  I mean, it's, you know, man-sized.
[01:25:32.560 --> 01:25:33.760]  I have Dr. Joe on.
[01:25:33.760 --> 01:25:38.400]  So not every microscope will pick it up, but it will pick up.
[01:25:38.400 --> 01:25:39.400]  Hold on.
[01:25:39.400 --> 01:25:40.400]  Hold on.
[01:25:40.400 --> 01:25:46.840]  I've got Dr. Joe on, and I happen to have a microscope I could see it with, but I don't
[01:25:46.840 --> 01:25:48.280]  know what to look at.
[01:25:48.280 --> 01:25:50.280]  Dr. Joe, are you there?
[01:25:50.280 --> 01:25:51.800]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:25:51.800 --> 01:25:53.280]  Can you hear me?
[01:25:53.280 --> 01:25:54.280]  Yes.
[01:25:54.280 --> 01:25:57.440]  Were you listening to Penny?
[01:25:57.440 --> 01:26:04.120]  This gal is talking about a dark field microscope, and it's a microscope that looks from the
[01:26:04.120 --> 01:26:07.880]  bottom, but the light comes in from the side.
[01:26:07.880 --> 01:26:13.400]  So you get a contrast, a phase contrast, and you can see all kinds of things.
[01:26:13.400 --> 01:26:15.080]  You can see parasites.
[01:26:15.080 --> 01:26:24.840]  I used to have a dark field system, but nanotechnology is so small that I don't believe that it would
[01:26:24.840 --> 01:26:25.840]  pick things up.
[01:26:25.840 --> 01:26:32.000]  You may be able to see what nanotechnology is influencing, but I don't believe you'd
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:35.240]  be able to see nanoparticles themselves.
[01:26:35.240 --> 01:26:37.080]  That's a good suggestion.
[01:26:37.080 --> 01:26:44.760]  I've always thought the live blood cell analysis was woefully underutilized, and at this time
[01:26:44.760 --> 01:26:51.600]  of the pandemic and the COVID, I think it's a valuable tool.
[01:26:51.600 --> 01:26:57.440]  It will indicate the function of your immune system, and on it, you can watch white blood
[01:26:57.440 --> 01:27:00.160]  cells chomping away at bacteria.
[01:27:00.160 --> 01:27:02.800]  You can watch parasites moving around.
[01:27:02.800 --> 01:27:07.320]  It's a worthwhile technology, but I think it's very valuable.
[01:27:07.320 --> 01:27:11.240]  Should I give you your answer, Randy?
[01:27:11.240 --> 01:27:13.640]  Yeah, I think so.
[01:27:13.640 --> 01:27:17.040]  What do you think, Penny?
[01:27:17.040 --> 01:27:19.200]  Do you want to hold on to the other side?
[01:27:19.200 --> 01:27:20.680]  We have an open board.
[01:27:20.680 --> 01:27:24.320]  I got something to confront Dr. Joe with.
[01:27:24.320 --> 01:27:25.320]  Oh, good.
[01:27:25.320 --> 01:27:27.840]  I'm open for confrontation.
[01:27:27.840 --> 01:27:29.840]  I'm open for confrontation.
[01:27:29.840 --> 01:27:30.840]  Okay.
[01:27:30.840 --> 01:27:37.840]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back.
[01:27:37.840 --> 01:27:44.000]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:48.880]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come, and they could cause a
[01:27:48.880 --> 01:27:49.880]  catastrophic blackout.
[01:27:49.880 --> 01:27:55.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:27:55.520 --> 01:27:57.240]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:27:57.240 --> 01:28:01.640]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[01:28:01.640 --> 01:28:05.840]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:11.160]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:28:11.160 --> 01:28:13.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:28:13.600 --> 01:28:19.200]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:28:19.200 --> 01:28:20.920]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:28:20.920 --> 01:28:25.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:28:25.040 --> 01:28:29.160]  Humans love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your
[01:28:29.160 --> 01:28:31.560]  home too with a smart grid.
[01:28:31.560 --> 01:28:35.720]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric
[01:28:35.720 --> 01:28:38.880]  use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:28:38.880 --> 01:28:43.880]  But cybersecurity expert David Choch says not so fast if we make the national power grid
[01:28:43.880 --> 01:28:47.800]  controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day.
[01:28:47.800 --> 01:28:52.640]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable
[01:28:52.640 --> 01:28:54.280]  to our enemies.
[01:28:54.280 --> 01:28:59.440]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons, but catastrophic failures
[01:28:59.440 --> 01:29:01.000]  caused by hackers?
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:02.720]  There's nothing smart about that.
[01:29:02.720 --> 01:29:10.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:29:10.640 --> 01:29:16.040]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:29:16.040 --> 01:29:18.280]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:23.080]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:29:23.080 --> 01:29:25.800]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:29:25.800 --> 01:29:28.520]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:29:28.520 --> 01:29:29.960]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:29:29.960 --> 01:29:30.960]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:29:30.960 --> 01:29:32.360]  I'm a New York City correction office.
[01:29:32.360 --> 01:29:33.360]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:29:33.360 --> 01:29:35.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:37.640]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:29:37.640 --> 01:29:40.520]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:29:40.520 --> 01:29:45.120]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:29:45.120 --> 01:29:48.640]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[01:29:48.640 --> 01:29:52.800]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:29:52.800 --> 01:29:56.080]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:29:56.080 --> 01:30:00.080]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:30:00.080 --> 01:30:03.960]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:30:03.960 --> 01:30:05.800]  our rights through due process.
[01:30:05.800 --> 01:30:09.320]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:30:09.320 --> 01:30:13.080]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:30:13.080 --> 01:30:15.480]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:30:15.480 --> 01:30:19.480]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:30:19.480 --> 01:30:20.800]  ordering your copy today.
[01:30:20.800 --> 01:30:24.160]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:30:24.160 --> 01:30:28.560]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:30:28.560 --> 01:30:30.880]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:30:30.880 --> 01:30:34.840]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:30:34.840 --> 01:31:03.320]  After your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:31:03.320 --> 01:31:09.560]  Okay, we are back and Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this 24th day
[01:31:09.560 --> 01:31:19.120]  of February, 2023, and we're talking to Penny in Texas and Dr. Joe.
[01:31:19.120 --> 01:31:24.680]  Okay, Penny, you wanted to challenge Dr. Joe, and he so loves to be challenged.
[01:31:24.680 --> 01:31:25.680]  Oh, good.
[01:31:25.680 --> 01:31:26.680]  I can hardly wait.
[01:31:26.680 --> 01:31:27.680]  So, you ready?
[01:31:27.680 --> 01:31:31.680]  Earn some money, Dr. Joe?
[01:31:31.680 --> 01:31:34.480]  Yes, dear, always.
[01:31:34.480 --> 01:31:43.280]  All right, there's a 1.5 million dollar, or actually Euro, challenge, viral challenge
[01:31:43.280 --> 01:31:44.280]  out there.
[01:31:44.280 --> 01:31:46.960]  It's been there for about a year.
[01:31:46.960 --> 01:31:53.160]  Nobody's claimed it yet because nobody can come up with an actual virus.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:58.560]  Not for COVID, not for Corona, not for rabies, not for HIV, none.
[01:31:58.560 --> 01:32:00.520]  Measles, polio, doesn't matter.
[01:32:00.520 --> 01:32:04.920]  It's not one virus has ever been found.
[01:32:04.920 --> 01:32:06.920]  Why do you think that is?
[01:32:06.920 --> 01:32:15.080]  Well, I've seen electron microscope photos of viruses, and the rationale seemed to be
[01:32:15.080 --> 01:32:18.600]  pretty good.
[01:32:18.600 --> 01:32:28.600]  They obey the laws of microbiology at the viral level, and viruses are many, many times
[01:32:28.600 --> 01:32:31.200]  smaller than bacteria.
[01:32:31.200 --> 01:32:32.200]  But I don't know.
[01:32:32.200 --> 01:32:35.960]  Who put this reward out?
[01:32:35.960 --> 01:32:50.440]  Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, both of Sam and Mark Bailey, and Dr. Stefan Lanker.
[01:32:50.440 --> 01:32:55.720]  Penny, where are you located in the great state of Texas?
[01:32:55.720 --> 01:32:57.320]  East Texas.
[01:32:57.320 --> 01:33:03.320]  Well, I think you and I should get together, put together a laboratory and prove them wrong.
[01:33:03.320 --> 01:33:05.840]  What do you think?
[01:33:05.840 --> 01:33:08.640]  I don't think we can prove them wrong.
[01:33:08.640 --> 01:33:11.640]  I mean, they've got it down pretty bad.
[01:33:11.640 --> 01:33:19.960]  They've done multiple studies, and Steven Lanker did one where he did exactly what they've
[01:33:19.960 --> 01:33:25.760]  been doing in order to, you know, because they're doing on monkey kidney cell cultures
[01:33:25.760 --> 01:33:32.240]  in order to find them, and the viruses and genomes that they're using to connect it up
[01:33:32.240 --> 01:33:40.880]  to the coronavirus is an historical model, and when Luke Montigny came up and got his
[01:33:40.880 --> 01:33:53.200]  Nobel Prize for finding the HIV virus, later on he admitted that, and his microscopic person
[01:33:53.200 --> 01:33:59.880]  that did the microscopy for him said they never did find the virus, and Luke Montigny
[01:33:59.880 --> 01:34:08.200]  himself admitted that they were probably exosomes, because, you know, that's exactly what is
[01:34:08.200 --> 01:34:15.680]  being shown on those electroselphograms.
[01:34:15.680 --> 01:34:21.920]  You're saying that someone accepted a Nobel Prize on the basis of a fraud?
[01:34:21.920 --> 01:34:26.160]  I'd like to read a little bit more about that.
[01:34:26.160 --> 01:34:30.600]  Well, consider what other Nobel Prizes have been given for.
[01:34:30.600 --> 01:34:35.160]  Well, they gave one to Barack Obama.
[01:34:35.160 --> 01:34:41.440]  I'm not saying that the Nobel Prize is to be all and end all, but that's a pretty good,
[01:34:41.440 --> 01:34:48.480]  that's a pretty big, you know, deception there, if he didn't have what he said he had.
[01:34:48.480 --> 01:34:53.040]  Yeah, it is, it is a big deception.
[01:34:53.040 --> 01:35:00.520]  In order to keep the cult of virology alive, they have to keep playing that narrative.
[01:35:00.520 --> 01:35:03.360]  Penny, the big dreams have it.
[01:35:03.360 --> 01:35:10.560]  I'm a local engineer, because this leads into what I'm, the point I'm trying to make here.
[01:35:10.560 --> 01:35:16.160]  And I've heard you say before that people, you know, they get used to a certain amount
[01:35:16.160 --> 01:35:23.200]  of EMS and ELF and, you know, electrical frequency and radio frequency.
[01:35:23.200 --> 01:35:30.240]  But when you look at radiation symptoms, symptoms of radiation, what do you come up with?
[01:35:30.240 --> 01:35:34.240]  A plastic anemia.
[01:35:34.240 --> 01:35:42.720]  And respiratory problems, skin eruptions, sound familiar?
[01:35:42.720 --> 01:35:50.320]  Yes, but there's a whole myriad of things that'll cause respiratory problems and skin
[01:35:50.320 --> 01:35:51.320]  eruptions.
[01:35:51.320 --> 01:35:52.320]  That's true.
[01:35:52.320 --> 01:35:59.080]  But if you look at why, I mean, I don't know whether you would agree with the fact that
[01:35:59.080 --> 01:36:09.120]  we're in a genocidal war right now, but the whole idea behind this event 201 was to get
[01:36:09.120 --> 01:36:14.720]  people inside isolated, separated so they could roll out 5G.
[01:36:14.720 --> 01:36:21.120]  And the first city that got fully rolled out in 5G was Wuhan, China.
[01:36:21.120 --> 01:36:26.200]  I'm not sure what that means.
[01:36:26.200 --> 01:36:35.080]  Well, it's like if you go back through every major pandemic that we've had, it all coincides
[01:36:35.080 --> 01:36:40.560]  with a new rollout of radio frequencies, electronic frequency.
[01:36:40.560 --> 01:36:44.200]  Wait a minute, that doesn't make sense.
[01:36:44.200 --> 01:36:50.840]  A new rollout of electronic frequencies, if you're talking about a new range of frequencies
[01:36:50.840 --> 01:36:57.400]  being assigned to a specific purpose, they can't roll out.
[01:36:57.400 --> 01:37:02.720]  Frequencies, frequencies are always there.
[01:37:02.720 --> 01:37:08.760]  The purpose has always been to sicken humanity.
[01:37:08.760 --> 01:37:18.440]  I've heard that, but all I've got to support it is misdirection and hyperbole.
[01:37:18.440 --> 01:37:19.440]  I haven't...
[01:37:19.440 --> 01:37:25.480]  Well, it's not hyperbole if you look at when the pandemic hit and what they were doing
[01:37:25.480 --> 01:37:37.320]  with the rollouts of new frequencies, it's beyond coincidence.
[01:37:37.320 --> 01:37:42.080]  Can you give us a specific example?
[01:37:42.080 --> 01:37:46.960]  Yeah, Mark Steele, he's in the UK.
[01:37:46.960 --> 01:37:57.840]  He was a developer of microwave weaponry, and he's been working really hard.
[01:37:57.840 --> 01:38:07.080]  He has a group in the UK called Save Us Now, and I actually have sent you quite a few videos,
[01:38:07.080 --> 01:38:08.080]  Randy.
[01:38:08.080 --> 01:38:14.040]  I know that you're really busy and you don't have time to go through them all, but when
[01:38:14.040 --> 01:38:20.560]  I run across really important ones, I send them to you, and Mark's kind of hard to understand
[01:38:20.560 --> 01:38:24.240]  because he got this big, broad British accent.
[01:38:24.240 --> 01:38:33.400]  I get 10 or 15 videos a day, and the vast majority of them would be crazy.
[01:38:33.400 --> 01:38:43.520]  Unsupported suppositions and unstated presuppositions are just primarily hyperbole.
[01:38:43.520 --> 01:38:52.960]  He can give you the absolute lowdown on the weapons that he developed and tell you exactly
[01:38:52.960 --> 01:39:00.280]  what they're implementing right now, and it's not hyperbole because people are dying from
[01:39:00.280 --> 01:39:01.280]  it.
[01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:06.760]  I mean, how many smart devices do you have in your home?
[01:39:06.760 --> 01:39:14.920]  What does that have to do with the effect of 5G?
[01:39:14.920 --> 01:39:24.200]  Ionizing radiation, they're getting hit with non-ionizing radiation, and we as a species
[01:39:24.200 --> 01:39:31.200]  evolved in a soup of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.
[01:39:31.200 --> 01:39:32.200]  It's accumulative.
[01:39:32.200 --> 01:39:33.200]  It's accumulative.
[01:39:33.200 --> 01:39:34.200]  What?
[01:39:34.200 --> 01:39:43.880]  And some people can't throw it off, so they get really affected by it.
[01:39:43.880 --> 01:39:51.640]  But is this, and I know someone that I met in Houston, and he's seen stuff all the time,
[01:39:51.640 --> 01:40:05.080]  and he was a jail guard, and his tower was right under a 250,000 watt volt, I think it's
[01:40:05.080 --> 01:40:12.320]  a 200,000 volt power line, and he had problems from it.
[01:40:12.320 --> 01:40:21.620]  But the whole population has evolved in the soup of electromagnetic radiation, and there
[01:40:21.620 --> 01:40:30.800]  are some theories that assert that the original germ for life was caused by the effect of
[01:40:30.800 --> 01:40:35.640]  radiation on organic compounds.
[01:40:35.640 --> 01:40:42.280]  But we get pulses from quasars, we get huge mass ejections from the sun.
[01:40:42.280 --> 01:40:48.360]  We're getting all kinds of radiation all of the time, and now all of a sudden it's
[01:40:48.360 --> 01:40:49.360]  killer.
[01:40:49.360 --> 01:40:55.560]  And it's being made, and it don't think that they don't know exactly what frequencies.
[01:40:55.560 --> 01:41:03.920]  I mean there are tons of documents from the military about weaponizing microwave.
[01:41:03.920 --> 01:41:12.360]  Yes, but the weaponizing of microwaves, you have to have waveguides that are so big and
[01:41:12.360 --> 01:41:19.760]  powerful that they put out something powerful on a literally flyer.
[01:41:19.760 --> 01:41:27.800]  I know they have those, but that doesn't support the issue of the argument.
[01:41:27.800 --> 01:41:39.800]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brent Fountain, the rule of law radio, we'll be right back.
[01:41:39.800 --> 01:41:45.840]  Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:41:45.840 --> 01:41:50.560]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:41:50.560 --> 01:41:56.280]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:41:56.280 --> 01:42:01.680]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:42:01.680 --> 01:42:05.080]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:42:05.080 --> 01:42:10.800]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:42:10.800 --> 01:42:16.040]  We have come to trust Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, along with
[01:42:16.040 --> 01:42:18.840]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:42:18.840 --> 01:42:25.160]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:42:25.160 --> 01:42:26.800]  quality radio.
[01:42:26.800 --> 01:42:31.120]  As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:42:31.120 --> 01:42:36.400]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:42:36.400 --> 01:42:38.360]  increase your income.
[01:42:38.360 --> 01:42:42.640]  Order now.
[01:42:42.640 --> 01:42:45.840]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:45.840 --> 01:42:51.840]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, four-CD
[01:42:51.840 --> 01:42:56.360]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:42:56.360 --> 01:43:00.360]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:43:00.360 --> 01:43:04.600]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:43:04.600 --> 01:43:09.480]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:43:09.480 --> 01:43:16.080]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:43:16.080 --> 01:43:20.680]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:43:20.680 --> 01:43:25.040]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:43:25.040 --> 01:43:31.160]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:43:31.160 --> 01:43:33.840]  prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:43:33.840 --> 01:43:37.760]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:43:37.760 --> 01:43:55.880]  Our call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:55.880 --> 01:43:59.280]  Okay, we are back.
[01:43:59.280 --> 01:44:05.160]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Penny in Texas.
[01:44:05.160 --> 01:44:11.440]  And Penny, if I sound difficult, it's because I get a lot of this stuff.
[01:44:11.440 --> 01:44:16.960]  And after a while, it gets frustrating, I get just all kinds of stuff and no real strong
[01:44:16.960 --> 01:44:25.120]  support for it, and I get information on both sides, and both parties are just as adamant
[01:44:25.120 --> 01:44:29.400]  that their information is correct, and it kind of makes me nuts.
[01:44:29.400 --> 01:44:35.880]  Yeah, I get that, that's why I don't send you more than I send you.
[01:44:35.880 --> 01:44:39.440]  I appreciate that because I've got lots of people sending me this stuff.
[01:44:39.440 --> 01:44:47.040]  I know you just overwhelmed, but this is something that really can't wait because it's rolling
[01:44:47.040 --> 01:44:56.000]  out fast and furious, and the nanotechnology is turning people into receivers and senders.
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:45:01.280]  They want an internet of things, and that includes bodies.
[01:45:01.280 --> 01:45:11.160]  I mean, I don't know how to address that.
[01:45:11.160 --> 01:45:18.120]  Every technology that comes out, I get this stuff about how is the worst thing going to
[01:45:18.120 --> 01:45:19.720]  kill us all.
[01:45:19.720 --> 01:45:23.720]  I've got this for 30 years, and it's frustrating.
[01:45:23.720 --> 01:45:30.280]  Yeah, no, no, which one is telling you good information.
[01:45:30.280 --> 01:45:35.480]  Okay, I do need to go on, I've got another caller, and I've only got less than a segment
[01:45:35.480 --> 01:45:37.480]  to get to it.
[01:45:37.480 --> 01:45:41.440]  Okay, I'm just going to send you some URLs.
[01:45:41.440 --> 01:45:43.400]  Okay, thank you, Penny.
[01:45:43.400 --> 01:45:47.400]  You can look for them if you want.
[01:45:47.400 --> 01:45:48.400]  Okay.
[01:45:48.400 --> 01:45:50.400]  Okay, thank you.
[01:45:50.400 --> 01:46:01.440]  I do give Jack, and if he wants to contact me about some help checking out his daughter-in-law
[01:46:01.440 --> 01:46:05.520]  or daughter, I'll help him as much as I can.
[01:46:05.520 --> 01:46:08.920]  I know a lot of really good doctors.
[01:46:08.920 --> 01:46:11.320]  Okay, thank you, Penny.
[01:46:11.320 --> 01:46:12.320]  Okay, Randy.
[01:46:12.320 --> 01:46:16.120]  Okay, now we're going to go to Max in Texas.
[01:46:16.120 --> 01:46:17.120]  Hello, Max.
[01:46:17.120 --> 01:46:20.600]  What do you have for us today?
[01:46:20.600 --> 01:46:23.640]  Hello, Randy.
[01:46:23.640 --> 01:46:28.720]  Okay, I can hear you.
[01:46:28.720 --> 01:46:35.080]  Just speaking of dangerous new technology, I wanted to let everyone know that the rule
[01:46:35.080 --> 01:46:38.640]  of law radius up and in business.
[01:46:38.640 --> 01:46:39.640]  Okay.
[01:46:39.640 --> 01:46:40.640]  You can have it.
[01:46:40.640 --> 01:46:41.640]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:46:41.640 --> 01:46:44.200]  Say that again, you broke up.
[01:46:44.200 --> 01:46:53.200]  You know, I've got a lot of years that will start to be archived audio for businesses.
[01:46:53.200 --> 01:47:01.480]  Wait a minute, are you on some kind of hands-free device because you're breaking up really
[01:47:01.480 --> 01:47:02.480]  bad?
[01:47:02.480 --> 01:47:03.480]  Hold on.
[01:47:03.480 --> 01:47:06.480]  Is that any better?
[01:47:06.480 --> 01:47:08.680]  Oh, yes.
[01:47:08.680 --> 01:47:16.880]  Get on my show with a hands-free, I would like you to take that phone and beat yourself
[01:47:16.880 --> 01:47:19.680]  around the eyes of your ears with it.
[01:47:19.680 --> 01:47:23.320]  Okay, that's much better.
[01:47:23.320 --> 01:47:26.440]  Now, what were you saying before you broke up?
[01:47:26.440 --> 01:47:30.480]  I couldn't get what you were saying.
[01:47:30.480 --> 01:47:36.720]  So I wanted to say that the rule of law radio search engine that I made is up and in business
[01:47:36.720 --> 01:47:39.640]  and it goes all the way back to 2009.
[01:47:39.640 --> 01:47:47.280]  So if you wanted to search for words and phrases used on the show, it's up and in business
[01:47:47.280 --> 01:47:54.080]  and I put it over at ruleoflawsearch.com.
[01:47:54.080 --> 01:47:55.760]  Is that the name of it?
[01:47:55.760 --> 01:47:59.200]  Oh, yeah, that's the URL, sir.
[01:47:59.200 --> 01:48:00.200]  Search.com.
[01:48:00.200 --> 01:48:01.200]  Oh, careful.
[01:48:01.200 --> 01:48:10.560]  I will put that down and give people to it.
[01:48:10.560 --> 01:48:14.520]  So this is kind of what, this was my invention so that I didn't have to take notes when I
[01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:15.520]  call in the show.
[01:48:15.520 --> 01:48:22.760]  I just, I can search Max in Texas and every time I've ever called is right there for me.
[01:48:22.760 --> 01:48:27.680]  Okay, how are you saving these?
[01:48:27.680 --> 01:48:31.160]  Let me back up and tell you why I'm asking that.
[01:48:31.160 --> 01:48:39.560]  I just got a bunch of two terabyte hard drives and a RAID card, an ADAPTEC RAID controller
[01:48:39.560 --> 01:48:45.960]  card and I'm trying to get up a file server setup.
[01:48:45.960 --> 01:48:52.760]  What do you know about setting up a file server?
[01:48:52.760 --> 01:48:56.560]  Too much.
[01:48:56.560 --> 01:49:07.360]  I built it on a, I set it up on a Linux box, but it looks like I was trying to set up UltraVNC.
[01:49:07.360 --> 01:49:15.480]  That's what I'm using now for our caller page and I couldn't figure out how to do it but
[01:49:15.480 --> 01:49:16.480]  it was over my head.
[01:49:16.480 --> 01:49:20.560]  Do you know how to set up RAID cards?
[01:49:20.560 --> 01:49:26.440]  I know how to configure a RAID setup with, I mean it just depends.
[01:49:26.440 --> 01:49:31.040]  You really need the drivers for it in Linux so, but after that, if your motherboard doesn't
[01:49:31.040 --> 01:49:32.440]  have RAID built in.
[01:49:32.440 --> 01:49:45.680]  Yeah, I downloaded drivers, but this one, this was a 7805 ADAPTEC card and the last update,
[01:49:45.680 --> 01:49:52.480]  updated drivers I could find for it were, oh several years ago, they went for Ubuntu
[01:49:52.480 --> 01:50:00.600]  14 and I have Ubunto 24.
[01:50:00.600 --> 01:50:04.000]  So this is a pretty old card.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:11.040]  Yeah, I mean normally, normally Ubuntu to will handle even old hardware and typically
[01:50:11.040 --> 01:50:14.440]  legacy drivers will work, but I mean it just depends.
[01:50:14.440 --> 01:50:18.120]  Really you just, with Ubuntu, you just tinker around with it in Google and you can
[01:50:18.120 --> 01:50:21.080]  eventually find out how to get work.
[01:50:21.080 --> 01:50:29.960]  Well I put the drives in, but when it booted, it saw the RAID card and the RAID card saw
[01:50:29.960 --> 01:50:33.040]  all the drives.
[01:50:33.040 --> 01:50:39.160]  But once I had it, got it up and running, it couldn't see them.
[01:50:39.160 --> 01:50:42.080]  You probably just need to mount them.
[01:50:42.080 --> 01:50:49.680]  I will, can you send me an email so that I have your email and can I call you for a consultation?
[01:50:49.680 --> 01:50:51.680]  Sure.
[01:50:51.680 --> 01:50:59.200]  Good, I need, I've got lots and lots of files and I need to access to them from anywhere.
[01:50:59.200 --> 01:51:02.320]  And so I wanted to set up this server.
[01:51:02.320 --> 01:51:07.000]  If I've got four RAID drives, two terabyte RAID drives in it, that should give me about
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:12.000]  four terabytes of storage.
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:19.840]  So I will send me an email and I will contact you.
[01:51:19.840 --> 01:51:23.680]  So how far back do you have our archives?
[01:51:23.680 --> 01:51:30.000]  All the way back to 2009 from the beginning of everything that's on Logos Radio Network.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:33.280]  Oh wow, that is wonderful.
[01:51:33.280 --> 01:51:37.000]  Even yesterday's show is already transcribed and up there.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:44.520]  Wow, do you have algorithms for that, do you have software to do that?
[01:51:44.520 --> 01:51:53.320]  Yeah, well, I mean, I'm actually using OpenAI's whisper platform to convert the audio into
[01:51:53.320 --> 01:51:54.520]  transcribed text.
[01:51:54.520 --> 01:51:58.000]  So it uses my GPU.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:03.600]  Wonderful, I'm definitely going to want to talk to you about this.
[01:52:03.600 --> 01:52:04.600]  I am.
[01:52:04.600 --> 01:52:05.600]  Sure.
[01:52:05.600 --> 01:52:10.120]  I'm working, have you heard me talk about the Electronic Lawyer Project?
[01:52:10.120 --> 01:52:14.520]  No, I certainly have.
[01:52:14.520 --> 01:52:24.320]  This I am at a point to where I'm exceeding my knowledge base.
[01:52:24.320 --> 01:52:31.680]  For due process alone, I have 1.5 million questions in my database.
[01:52:31.680 --> 01:52:40.680]  And they will isolate all of the motions and pleadings that are indicated in a particular
[01:52:40.680 --> 01:52:43.120]  case.
[01:52:43.120 --> 01:52:49.720]  And what I'm doing is I've got a set of O'Connor's forms, O'Connor's litigation guide forms
[01:52:49.720 --> 01:52:52.840]  from 2008.
[01:52:52.840 --> 01:52:59.960]  And these are forms that you would pull up and like for jurisdiction, they may have three
[01:52:59.960 --> 01:53:04.640]  or four different paragraphs, a number of the paragraphs, and the one I was looking
[01:53:04.640 --> 01:53:10.080]  at paragraph five was jurisdiction, and there were four of them.
[01:53:10.080 --> 01:53:16.880]  And the direction said to select the one that fit your circumstance and then fill in the
[01:53:16.880 --> 01:53:24.720]  blanks inside that section, like you'd fill in the court names and such.
[01:53:24.720 --> 01:53:34.200]  What I want to do is take all of these forms that O'Connor's have and all of the repeating
[01:53:34.200 --> 01:53:38.640]  sections, I want to drop all those in a database.
[01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:44.440]  And then like for jurisdiction, all the questions we'd need for jurisdiction, we'd build a
[01:53:44.440 --> 01:53:51.000]  questionnaire to ask those, and it will select the correct paragraph, fill in the missing
[01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:54.760]  information and then drop it in the document.
[01:53:54.760 --> 01:54:08.040]  And as we move down through the different issues, anytime we argue an issue, it doesn't
[01:54:08.040 --> 01:54:15.360]  make any difference what the facts set is that brings me to a legal issue.
[01:54:15.360 --> 01:54:21.880]  And this show is part of what taught me this when I say, never make a proactive statement
[01:54:21.880 --> 01:54:24.360]  of law out of your own mouth.
[01:54:24.360 --> 01:54:30.920]  That forced me to make all of my motions and pleadings and arguments in those motions and
[01:54:30.920 --> 01:54:39.640]  pleadings to create them from references to case law and such.
[01:54:39.640 --> 01:54:46.440]  And it turned out that no matter what the facts set is that leads me to this particular
[01:54:46.440 --> 01:54:53.480]  legal issue, we always argue that issue exactly the same.
[01:54:53.480 --> 01:55:01.080]  So we build the argument for that issue, drop it in the database, and build a relatively
[01:55:01.080 --> 01:55:08.320]  universal intro and outro, the introduction sentence and then sentence that leads out
[01:55:08.320 --> 01:55:10.560]  but leads out neutral.
[01:55:10.560 --> 01:55:16.640]  So the next paragraph, I'm putting a heading on every paragraph, we'll have another heading
[01:55:16.640 --> 01:55:19.640]  and it'll have the next issue.
[01:55:19.640 --> 01:55:27.280]  So I want all those in the database and then build a tool that will follow my questions,
[01:55:27.280 --> 01:55:35.040]  select the person is done, it selects the documents that are indicated by the answers
[01:55:35.040 --> 01:55:44.160]  to the questions and creates those documents in the fully hyperlinked format so that the
[01:55:44.160 --> 01:55:47.080]  lawyer can download sign and send.
[01:55:47.080 --> 01:55:53.360]  We're going to give our questionnaire map to lawyers for free.
[01:55:53.360 --> 01:55:58.160]  That way when they find new law or something or law changes, they can make adjustments
[01:55:58.160 --> 01:56:02.320]  to it and they maintain our database for us.
[01:56:02.320 --> 01:56:07.960]  And then we sell them the documents that we create and then once we get all the information
[01:56:07.960 --> 01:56:15.960]  we make it available to the pro say and eliminate the need for lawyers.
[01:56:15.960 --> 01:56:18.960]  Can you help me with that?
[01:56:18.960 --> 01:56:21.600]  Maybe it sounds like a very complicated model.
[01:56:21.600 --> 01:56:29.200]  A little bit, okay, we are out of time, send me an email, Randy Kelton, Brett Felton.
[01:56:29.200 --> 01:56:35.160]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New
[01:56:35.160 --> 01:56:37.080]  Testament Recovery Version.
[01:56:37.080 --> 01:56:42.040]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:56:42.040 --> 01:56:47.720]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:56:47.720 --> 01:56:55.920]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America, call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:56:55.920 --> 01:57:00.000]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:05.520]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:09.520]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:57:09.520 --> 01:57:12.080]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:57:12.080 --> 01:57:20.240]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:57:20.240 --> 01:57:30.640]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:57:30.640 --> 01:57:32.240]  Looking for some truth?
[01:57:32.240 --> 01:57:52.440]  You can find it at LogosRadioNetwork.com.