ROL_2023-02-10_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.520]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.520 --> 00:09.560]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.560 --> 00:11.040]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.040 --> 00:14.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.960 --> 00:17.060]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:17.060 --> 00:18.640]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.640 --> 00:22.240]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.240 --> 00:27.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.040 --> 00:28.040]  So protect your rights.
[00:28.040 --> 00:32.120]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.120 --> 00:33.120]  Privacy.
[00:33.120 --> 00:34.800]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.800 --> 00:39.080]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:39.080 --> 00:42.620]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.620 --> 00:44.840]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.840 --> 00:45.840]  Spar.
[00:45.840 --> 00:47.920]  It's what fighters do.
[00:47.920 --> 00:50.920]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.920 --> 00:54.520]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.520 --> 00:56.640]  S-P-A-R with an extra P.
[00:56.640 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:07.080]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:07.080 --> 01:08.640]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.640 --> 01:10.600]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.600 --> 01:14.720]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.720 --> 01:18.240]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.240 --> 01:20.800]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.800 --> 01:22.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.840 --> 01:31.200]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.200 --> 01:34.880]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.880 --> 01:38.320]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.320 --> 01:39.800]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.800 --> 01:43.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.700 --> 01:46.840]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.840 --> 01:48.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.440 --> 01:52.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:52.040 --> 01:56.800]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.800 --> 02:01.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.800 --> 02:04.560]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[02:04.560 --> 02:08.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.840 --> 02:12.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.400 --> 02:15.960]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.960 --> 02:20.320]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.320 --> 02:22.400]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.400 --> 02:26.880]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.880 --> 02:30.680]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.680 --> 02:31.680]  Get it?
[02:31.680 --> 02:34.040]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:34.040 --> 02:37.640]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.640 --> 02:43.400]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[02:43.400 --> 02:47.520]  government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.520 --> 02:50.560]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.560 --> 02:52.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.560 --> 03:18.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:18.760 --> 03:40.480]  Cheers.
[03:40.480 --> 03:46.800]  taking a thing that belongs to me and couldn't do good to you
[03:46.800 --> 03:50.000]  but i was good for the gander
[03:50.000 --> 03:51.600]  gonna work for the goo
[03:51.600 --> 03:54.320]  okay we are back
[03:54.320 --> 03:55.760]  i know some arc
[03:55.760 --> 03:58.080]  top of the hour
[03:58.080 --> 04:02.080]  serendipity helton, brett fountain, helen law radio
[04:02.080 --> 04:06.640]  oh it's the top of the hour on this uh the
[04:06.640 --> 04:09.040]  now i forgot the date the tenth day of
[04:09.040 --> 04:12.160]  february 2023
[04:12.160 --> 04:14.480]  and we're going to go to
[04:14.480 --> 04:17.440]  we have a caller in a first-time caller
[04:17.440 --> 04:18.720]  from vancouver
[04:18.720 --> 04:23.360]  can you give us a first name and a state
[04:23.360 --> 04:25.360]  you call them states in in canada
[04:25.360 --> 04:26.480]  provinces
[04:26.480 --> 04:32.880]  provinces give us a first name
[04:32.880 --> 04:36.080]  well come on me there you go can you
[04:36.080 --> 04:38.480]  can you hear me great now i now i can
[04:38.480 --> 04:40.080]  you
[04:40.080 --> 04:41.920]  wonderful my name is andre and i'm
[04:41.920 --> 04:43.120]  calling from
[04:43.120 --> 04:46.080]  vancouver british columbia and i
[04:46.080 --> 04:47.920]  appreciate the opportunity to ask a
[04:47.920 --> 04:49.440]  question
[04:49.440 --> 04:53.120]  both you randy and and brett
[04:53.120 --> 04:55.120]  and i'm just so impressed with the work
[04:55.120 --> 04:56.720]  that amanda's been doing
[04:56.720 --> 04:59.840]  it's absolutely awesome the research and
[04:59.840 --> 05:02.720]  i'm a newcomer to her line of thinking
[05:02.720 --> 05:05.600]  my question has to do with appearing
[05:05.600 --> 05:06.400]  before
[05:06.400 --> 05:09.520]  a justice of the peace on a matter
[05:09.520 --> 05:12.400]  being convicted um then going through
[05:12.400 --> 05:13.760]  the appeal stage
[05:13.760 --> 05:17.120]  having that appeal denied could one not
[05:17.120 --> 05:20.160]  escalate the matter to a court of
[05:20.160 --> 05:21.440]  inherent jurisdiction
[05:21.440 --> 05:24.080]  in ontario being the supreme the
[05:24.080 --> 05:24.960]  superior court
[05:24.960 --> 05:28.400]  of justice and and find the
[05:28.400 --> 05:31.440]  the remedy or and the equity in that
[05:31.440 --> 05:34.000]  particular court
[05:34.000 --> 05:36.560]  no i don't believe it can but what i'm
[05:36.560 --> 05:39.280]  going to say to you is this andre
[05:39.280 --> 05:41.680]  because we have the same like a lot of
[05:41.680 --> 05:43.600]  the things start in the
[05:43.600 --> 05:45.600]  uh i'm going to call them the kangaroo
[05:45.600 --> 05:47.040]  courts it's just
[05:47.040 --> 05:49.600]  that way so those the kangaroo courts
[05:49.600 --> 05:51.840]  don't have inherent jurisdiction
[05:51.840 --> 05:54.000]  now everyone in canada has the right to
[05:54.000 --> 05:55.200]  one appeal
[05:55.200 --> 05:57.360]  the first appeal of the freebie and if
[05:57.360 --> 05:59.600]  you lose that appeal then you have to
[05:59.600 --> 06:00.560]  get leave
[06:00.560 --> 06:02.720]  from the court which is permission so if
[06:02.720 --> 06:04.000]  you lose the first appeal you have to
[06:04.000 --> 06:06.320]  get permission of the from the court to
[06:06.320 --> 06:08.320]  have a second appeal which you may or
[06:08.320 --> 06:09.840]  may not get
[06:09.840 --> 06:12.560]  but in that very first court what people
[06:12.560 --> 06:14.320]  need to understand
[06:14.320 --> 06:16.800]  is you need to make sure you bring the
[06:16.800 --> 06:18.480]  right argument
[06:18.480 --> 06:21.120]  in the trial because when you don't
[06:21.120 --> 06:22.000]  bring the right
[06:22.000 --> 06:23.440]  argument in the trial you will not
[06:23.440 --> 06:25.840]  establish the errors in law
[06:25.840 --> 06:28.400]  that you need to point out in the appeal
[06:28.400 --> 06:29.840]  because you don't get a new trial in the
[06:29.840 --> 06:31.120]  appeal
[06:31.120 --> 06:34.080]  so my point is is if it's me
[06:34.080 --> 06:35.840]  and i'm going into the court i'm going
[06:35.840 --> 06:36.880]  to build
[06:36.880 --> 06:39.840]  my argument um my defense
[06:39.840 --> 06:42.320]  on a constitutional challenge every
[06:42.320 --> 06:43.600]  single time
[06:43.600 --> 06:46.880]  and if the kangaroo court um is
[06:46.880 --> 06:48.480]  violating my rights
[06:48.480 --> 06:51.040]  and i'm going to i'm going to
[06:51.040 --> 06:52.080]  constitutionally
[06:52.080 --> 06:54.960]  build the case on that to prove the case
[06:54.960 --> 06:56.480]  knowing full well that they're probably
[06:56.480 --> 06:58.320]  going to railroad me knowing full well
[06:58.320 --> 06:59.600]  that i'll probably lose
[06:59.600 --> 07:02.640]  but the point is if i establish the
[07:02.640 --> 07:04.320]  argument on the record
[07:04.320 --> 07:06.720]  now i have that argument to use to
[07:06.720 --> 07:08.720]  establish the errors in law
[07:08.720 --> 07:11.040]  in the appeal court which will be a
[07:11.040 --> 07:13.200]  court of inherent jurisdiction
[07:13.200 --> 07:17.680]  um now there's not the case in Alberta
[07:17.680 --> 07:19.840]  that's another story
[07:19.840 --> 07:21.440]  but in British Columbia i believe that
[07:21.440 --> 07:23.040]  will that your appeals court will be a
[07:23.040 --> 07:24.560]  court of inherent jurisdiction but it's
[07:24.560 --> 07:26.240]  really important to make sure you bring
[07:26.240 --> 07:27.760]  the right argument
[07:27.760 --> 07:29.840]  the first go-around um because if you
[07:29.840 --> 07:31.520]  don't establish the fact that
[07:31.520 --> 07:35.360]  uh the xyz is unconstitutional
[07:35.360 --> 07:38.400]  you can't argue that in as an error in
[07:38.400 --> 07:39.280]  the appeals court
[07:39.280 --> 07:40.880]  you have to you have to be first
[07:40.880 --> 07:43.120]  established in the trial court
[07:43.120 --> 07:46.880]  yes let me speak to this for a moment
[07:46.880 --> 07:49.920]  this will be essentially universal
[07:49.920 --> 07:53.440]  when you sit in front of a judge
[07:53.440 --> 07:56.720]  the judge as a rule only has
[07:56.720 --> 08:00.720]  two duties the first duty is to determine
[08:00.720 --> 08:02.720]  the facts in accordance with the rules
[08:02.720 --> 08:04.240]  of evidence
[08:04.240 --> 08:07.040]  then apply the law as it comes to him to
[08:07.040 --> 08:08.880]  the facts in the case
[08:08.880 --> 08:13.200]  so your only purpose in the trial court
[08:13.200 --> 08:15.920]  is to put the facts and the law
[08:15.920 --> 08:19.200]  in front of the judge
[08:19.200 --> 08:20.720]  you can give the judge the most
[08:20.720 --> 08:23.040]  convincing arguments
[08:23.040 --> 08:26.800]  and the greatest reasons why you're right
[08:26.800 --> 08:29.200]  and he may agree with you
[08:29.200 --> 08:32.400]  but if you don't bring him facts and law
[08:32.400 --> 08:34.480]  you haven't given him anything he can
[08:34.480 --> 08:35.680]  work with
[08:35.680 --> 08:38.240]  and you're only and when you go to the
[08:38.240 --> 08:40.640]  trial court you should never expect to
[08:40.640 --> 08:41.680]  win your case
[08:41.680 --> 08:45.280]  in the trial court your only purpose
[08:45.280 --> 08:46.080]  there
[08:46.080 --> 08:48.720]  is to get the facts and the law on the
[08:48.720 --> 08:49.920]  record
[08:49.920 --> 08:53.200]  for the appellate court now what amanda
[08:53.200 --> 08:54.000]  said about
[08:54.000 --> 08:56.480]  how appeals work in canada are
[08:56.480 --> 08:58.960]  precisely the same as in the u.s
[08:58.960 --> 09:02.080]  if you're appealing from a inferior
[09:02.080 --> 09:03.840]  court
[09:03.840 --> 09:06.880]  then your first appeal is free here they
[09:06.880 --> 09:08.480]  call it trial de novo
[09:08.480 --> 09:12.400]  it's actually a do-over but
[09:12.400 --> 09:14.960]  it's apparently not in canada so you
[09:14.960 --> 09:16.720]  need to make sure in that trial court
[09:16.720 --> 09:18.160]  you get the facts and law
[09:18.160 --> 09:20.160]  on the record because when you get to
[09:20.160 --> 09:22.160]  the to the appellate court
[09:22.160 --> 09:24.560]  they're different than the trial court
[09:24.560 --> 09:26.800]  the trial court has to deal with the
[09:26.800 --> 09:28.640]  general public
[09:28.640 --> 09:31.120]  and they have to give the appearance of
[09:31.120 --> 09:32.320]  being fair
[09:32.320 --> 09:34.400]  and treating everybody one equal and
[09:34.400 --> 09:36.240]  have to do all kind of political stuff
[09:36.240 --> 09:37.760]  the appellate court doesn't do any of
[09:37.760 --> 09:38.960]  that
[09:38.960 --> 09:42.560]  the appellate court looks at the facts
[09:42.560 --> 09:44.000]  that were
[09:44.000 --> 09:45.840]  properly put on the record in
[09:45.840 --> 09:48.000]  accordance with the rules of evidence
[09:48.000 --> 09:50.960]  then they look at how the the
[09:50.960 --> 09:53.920]  trier of the fact applied the
[09:53.920 --> 09:56.320]  the law that was put before him to those
[09:56.320 --> 09:57.440]  facts
[09:57.440 --> 09:59.360]  so if you're going to go into court the
[09:59.360 --> 10:01.200]  first thing you should do
[10:01.200 --> 10:05.440]  is find the pattern jury charge
[10:05.440 --> 10:07.680]  amanda you have jury charges i take it
[10:07.680 --> 10:10.400]  in canada
[10:10.400 --> 10:14.400]  um we have the right to a jury
[10:14.400 --> 10:16.880]  but people don't know how to use how to
[10:16.880 --> 10:18.000]  establish that
[10:18.000 --> 10:19.760]  no no that's not what i'm talking about
[10:19.760 --> 10:21.200]  i'm sorry then i'm not sure i
[10:21.200 --> 10:22.240]  understand the term
[10:22.240 --> 10:25.040]  a pattern jury charge is if you have a
[10:25.040 --> 10:26.320]  jury
[10:26.320 --> 10:29.760]  the last thing the judge will say to the
[10:29.760 --> 10:30.400]  jury
[10:30.400 --> 10:34.560]  is this is what you must
[10:34.560 --> 10:38.880]  find and that will tell you
[10:38.880 --> 10:42.960]  this is what you must prove to the court
[10:42.960 --> 10:45.360]  if you bring anything else before the
[10:45.360 --> 10:48.160]  court you're wasting your time
[10:48.160 --> 10:49.920]  they can't consider it the only thing
[10:49.920 --> 10:51.440]  they will consider is what's in that
[10:51.440 --> 10:53.120]  jury charge
[10:53.120 --> 10:56.400]  if it's brought by non-disclosure
[10:56.400 --> 10:59.840]  you must prove that the defendant
[10:59.840 --> 11:03.280]  made a voluntary statement that
[11:03.280 --> 11:06.000]  the defendant intended that you take the
[11:06.000 --> 11:08.160]  voluntary statement is true
[11:08.160 --> 11:11.440]  that the statement was untrue that you
[11:11.440 --> 11:13.360]  accepted it as true
[11:13.360 --> 11:15.760]  you made a decision based on that
[11:15.760 --> 11:18.000]  acceptance and you are harmed thereby
[11:18.000 --> 11:21.520]  if you miss one of those the judge
[11:21.520 --> 11:24.880]  cannot rule in your favor so
[11:24.880 --> 11:26.960]  whatever your your issue is whatever
[11:26.960 --> 11:28.320]  your case is
[11:28.320 --> 11:31.360]  go look for what a judge would tell the
[11:31.360 --> 11:32.640]  jury
[11:32.640 --> 11:34.240]  that's the easiest place to find all of
[11:34.240 --> 11:36.640]  it if you can't find that
[11:36.640 --> 11:38.320]  look for something that gives you the
[11:38.320 --> 11:39.600]  elements
[11:39.600 --> 11:43.200]  of the crime or the cause of action
[11:43.200 --> 11:46.800]  you must prove every single element
[11:46.800 --> 11:50.160]  you miss one you're toast
[11:50.160 --> 11:52.960]  does that make sense andres i appreciate
[11:52.960 --> 11:54.480]  yeah i appreciate that except we don't
[11:54.480 --> 11:56.560]  have juries up here
[11:56.560 --> 12:00.000]  well we can andre it and it is our right
[12:00.000 --> 12:00.480]  under
[12:00.480 --> 12:02.160]  i can't remember what part of section two
[12:02.160 --> 12:04.160]  of the canadian bill of rights
[12:04.160 --> 12:07.360]  and it is something you can push for but
[12:07.360 --> 12:09.280]  i'm not going to what i want to say
[12:09.280 --> 12:12.880]  actually is this if you're going into
[12:12.880 --> 12:15.520]  a court regardless of the the type of
[12:15.520 --> 12:16.960]  court you're going into
[12:16.960 --> 12:20.400]  and you want to attempt to invoke the
[12:20.400 --> 12:21.840]  canadian bill of rights
[12:21.840 --> 12:23.520]  you will have to establish some sort of
[12:23.520 --> 12:26.960]  a constitutional argument to do it
[12:26.960 --> 12:28.960]  anytime you establish any kind of
[12:28.960 --> 12:30.800]  constitutional argument
[12:30.800 --> 12:34.080]  you must make sure every time
[12:34.080 --> 12:37.920]  to address it and and and serve
[12:37.920 --> 12:41.120]  and serve it to his majesty the king
[12:41.120 --> 12:43.360]  minister of justice and attorney general
[12:43.360 --> 12:45.040]  of canada which by the way
[12:45.040 --> 12:47.120]  is all the same person that's david
[12:47.120 --> 12:48.960]  limetti
[12:48.960 --> 12:51.840]  because david limetti ex ex officio
[12:51.840 --> 12:54.320]  his majesty the king by virtue of his
[12:54.320 --> 12:55.200]  office he is
[12:55.200 --> 12:57.760]  his majesty the king as he is the
[12:57.760 --> 12:59.360]  minister of justice as he is the
[12:59.360 --> 13:01.280]  attorney general of canada under section
[13:01.280 --> 13:01.760]  two
[13:01.760 --> 13:03.760]  of the ministry of of the department of
[13:03.760 --> 13:05.040]  justice act
[13:05.040 --> 13:06.880]  you also must make sure you send it to
[13:06.880 --> 13:09.600]  your attorney general of the province
[13:09.600 --> 13:11.920]  every time you build a constitutional
[13:11.920 --> 13:13.200]  argument
[13:13.200 --> 13:16.640]  if this person is the same person in
[13:16.640 --> 13:20.080]  three different incarnations do
[13:20.080 --> 13:22.800]  will service on one of them affect
[13:22.800 --> 13:24.160]  service on all of them
[13:24.160 --> 13:25.680]  or do you have to serve each one
[13:25.680 --> 13:28.640]  separately best as i can tell
[13:28.640 --> 13:30.720]  it's one in the same but i could be
[13:30.720 --> 13:31.360]  wrong
[13:31.360 --> 13:34.960]  because it's all the same address
[13:34.960 --> 13:38.560]  service on the crown is one address
[13:38.560 --> 13:41.760]  and in all three incarnations
[13:41.760 --> 13:44.560]  it is the crown
[13:45.280 --> 13:47.920]  okay can i can i just ask a follow-up
[13:47.920 --> 13:49.280]  i know that
[13:49.280 --> 13:51.520]  in her recent video amanda pointed out
[13:51.520 --> 13:52.880]  that she
[13:52.880 --> 13:54.800]  had a case or a matter before the
[13:54.800 --> 13:56.000]  kangaroo courts
[13:56.000 --> 13:59.840]  and it was ruled opca and
[13:59.840 --> 14:01.520]  with these the steps you followed
[14:01.520 --> 14:04.720]  amanda to have that decision reversed
[14:04.720 --> 14:07.440]  and actually have the judge
[14:07.440 --> 14:10.560]  withdraw that that comment
[14:10.560 --> 14:13.920]  yes so i don't know if randy and and
[14:13.920 --> 14:17.280]  brett know this in canada we have a term
[14:17.280 --> 14:19.840]  that the courts have adopted called opca
[14:19.840 --> 14:21.120]  which stands for organized
[14:21.120 --> 14:23.760]  pseudo-legal commercial argument
[14:23.760 --> 14:26.000]  it's uh it was created and established
[14:26.000 --> 14:27.360]  by a decision
[14:27.360 --> 14:29.440]  by chief justice associate chief
[14:29.440 --> 14:31.840]  justice rook of alberta
[14:31.840 --> 14:34.400]  in his decision called meads versus
[14:34.400 --> 14:38.720]  meads um and i did try
[14:38.720 --> 14:40.880]  so again i've been on a really steep
[14:40.880 --> 14:43.200]  learning curve guys
[14:43.200 --> 14:46.560]  and i did a constitutional argument
[14:46.560 --> 14:50.080]  to do a motion to quash back in october
[14:50.080 --> 14:53.520]  and while the while there are some errors
[14:53.520 --> 14:55.280]  in the motion itself
[14:55.280 --> 14:59.040]  um the the
[14:59.040 --> 15:01.680]  prosecutor the crown attorney responded
[15:01.680 --> 15:03.600]  not by speaking to the argument
[15:03.600 --> 15:08.000]  but by labeling me um this opca litigant
[15:08.000 --> 15:10.720]  and when we walked into court um i it
[15:10.720 --> 15:11.680]  was not
[15:11.680 --> 15:13.840]  actually me that was under the charges
[15:13.840 --> 15:15.120]  but i was given permission to
[15:15.120 --> 15:16.720]  represent the people because of my
[15:16.720 --> 15:18.160]  attachment to them and that's all i'm
[15:18.160 --> 15:19.680]  going to say
[15:19.680 --> 15:22.560]  um and so when we walked into court that
[15:22.560 --> 15:23.440]  morning
[15:23.440 --> 15:26.240]  that it was a zoom court so it was
[15:26.240 --> 15:29.920]  virtual and the uh it was a
[15:29.920 --> 15:32.480]  technically it was a closed court yet
[15:32.480 --> 15:34.960]  the courtroom was full of about 60
[15:34.960 --> 15:36.800]  unidentified observers so they were
[15:36.800 --> 15:38.720]  using the courtroom as a classroom and
[15:38.720 --> 15:39.280]  we were
[15:39.280 --> 15:40.960]  and we were we were the subject of the
[15:40.960 --> 15:42.960]  day and
[15:42.960 --> 15:46.320]  the justice of peace uh when it came in
[15:46.320 --> 15:48.640]  the court clerk read our read the names
[15:48.640 --> 15:49.600]  on the record they
[15:49.600 --> 15:52.560]  they didn't even let us speak the court
[15:52.560 --> 15:54.960]  then just informed everybody that a
[15:54.960 --> 15:56.640]  decision had already been made
[15:56.640 --> 15:59.840]  i objected because we had only just
[15:59.840 --> 16:01.600]  received the response from the crown
[16:01.600 --> 16:05.520]  attorney not in enough time to respond
[16:05.520 --> 16:10.160]  in due you know with three days um
[16:10.160 --> 16:12.320]  so but my point is we got the written
[16:12.320 --> 16:13.760]  response in but it was in less than
[16:13.760 --> 16:14.400]  three days
[16:14.400 --> 16:17.600]  before the date the judge sorry the
[16:17.600 --> 16:19.440]  justice i'm going to call it a justice
[16:19.440 --> 16:21.040]  because this person is not a judge
[16:21.040 --> 16:22.000]  they're not
[16:22.000 --> 16:24.240]  a court they're not constitutionally
[16:24.240 --> 16:26.400]  bound so the justice
[16:26.400 --> 16:30.160]  um uh had the court clerk mute me
[16:30.160 --> 16:32.480]  and said i'm not taking any written
[16:32.480 --> 16:33.680]  submissions you didn't give them to us
[16:33.680 --> 16:34.720]  on time
[16:34.720 --> 16:36.720]  uh and she set it a rule didn't give me
[16:36.720 --> 16:38.880]  a chance to set any rules back
[16:38.880 --> 16:42.000]  i kept objecting she kept muting i
[16:42.000 --> 16:43.040]  objected again
[16:43.040 --> 16:44.960]  saying we have the right to defend
[16:44.960 --> 16:47.440]  ourselves against these allegations
[16:47.440 --> 16:50.000]  of the crown attorney she kept muting me
[16:50.000 --> 16:52.320]  muting me muting me
[16:52.320 --> 16:55.760]  i made it damn clear though that i was
[16:55.760 --> 16:57.040]  objecting and i was trying to put
[16:57.040 --> 16:58.640]  judicial notice on the record that we
[16:58.640 --> 17:00.800]  were not being given our are you being
[17:00.800 --> 17:02.720]  harassed by debt collectors with phone
[17:02.720 --> 17:05.120]  calls letters or even lawsuits
[17:05.120 --> 17:06.960]  stop debt collectors now with the
[17:06.960 --> 17:08.800]  michael mirrors proven method
[17:08.800 --> 17:10.880]  michael mirrors has won six cases in
[17:10.880 --> 17:12.640]  federal court against debt collectors
[17:12.640 --> 17:14.400]  and now you can win too
[17:14.400 --> 17:16.320]  you'll get step-by-step instructions in
[17:16.320 --> 17:18.400]  plain english on how to win in court
[17:18.400 --> 17:20.560]  using federal civil rights statutes
[17:20.560 --> 17:23.200]  what to do when contacted by phones mail
[17:23.200 --> 17:24.240]  or court summons
[17:24.240 --> 17:26.320]  how to answer letters and phone calls
[17:26.320 --> 17:28.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your
[17:28.000 --> 17:30.000]  credit report how to turn the financial
[17:30.000 --> 17:32.800]  tables on them and make them pay you to
[17:32.800 --> 17:33.600]  go away
[17:33.600 --> 17:36.000]  the michael mirrors proven method is the
[17:36.000 --> 17:37.680]  solution for how to stop debt
[17:37.680 --> 17:39.760]  collectors personal consultation is
[17:39.760 --> 17:42.000]  available as well for more information
[17:42.000 --> 17:44.400]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and
[17:44.400 --> 17:46.480]  click on the blue michael mirrors banner
[17:46.480 --> 17:49.280]  or email michael mirrors at yahoo.com
[17:49.280 --> 17:52.400]  that's rule of law radio.com or email
[17:52.400 --> 17:57.120]  m i c h a e l m i r r a s at yahoo.com
[17:57.120 --> 17:59.280]  to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.280 --> 18:03.200]  now rule of law radio is proud to offer
[18:03.200 --> 18:04.880]  the rule of law traffic seminar in
[18:04.880 --> 18:06.560]  today's america we live in an us against
[18:06.560 --> 18:08.000]  them society and if we the people are
[18:08.000 --> 18:09.600]  ever going to have a free society then
[18:09.600 --> 18:11.200]  we're going to have to stand and defend
[18:11.200 --> 18:13.120]  our own rights among those rights are
[18:13.120 --> 18:14.640]  the right to travel freely from place to
[18:14.640 --> 18:16.000]  place the right to act in our own
[18:16.000 --> 18:17.520]  private capacity and most importantly
[18:17.520 --> 18:19.280]  the right to due process of law
[18:19.280 --> 18:20.800]  traffic courts afford us the least
[18:20.800 --> 18:22.560]  expensive opportunity to learn how to
[18:22.560 --> 18:23.920]  enforce and preserve our rights
[18:23.920 --> 18:25.680]  through due process former sheriff's
[18:25.680 --> 18:27.280]  deputy eddie craig in conjunction with
[18:27.280 --> 18:28.800]  rule of law radio has put together the
[18:28.800 --> 18:30.240]  most comprehensive teaching tool
[18:30.240 --> 18:31.760]  available that will help you understand
[18:31.760 --> 18:33.440]  what due process is and how to hold
[18:33.440 --> 18:35.040]  the courts to the rule of law you can
[18:35.040 --> 18:36.560]  get your own copy of this invaluable
[18:36.560 --> 18:38.320]  material by going to rule of law radio
[18:38.320 --> 18:40.320]  dot com and ordering your copy today by
[18:40.320 --> 18:41.760]  ordering now you'll receive a copy of
[18:41.760 --> 18:43.200]  eddie's book the texas transportation
[18:43.200 --> 18:45.200]  code the law versus the lie video and
[18:45.200 --> 18:47.200]  audio of the original 2009 seminar
[18:47.200 --> 18:48.640]  hundreds of research documents and
[18:48.640 --> 18:50.400]  other useful resource materials learn
[18:50.400 --> 18:51.600]  how to fight for your rights with the
[18:51.600 --> 18:53.040]  help of this material from rule of law
[18:53.040 --> 18:55.200]  radio.com order your copy today and
[18:55.200 --> 18:57.120]  together we can have the free society we
[18:57.120 --> 19:00.000]  all want and deserve
[19:12.720 --> 19:15.520]  well don't let nothing get to you only
[19:15.520 --> 19:17.760]  the father can't deliver you
[19:17.760 --> 19:20.800]  don't let bad mind people hurt you
[19:20.800 --> 19:25.600]  and trust this and get behind you know what i mean
[19:25.600 --> 19:52.400]  my friend
[19:55.600 --> 19:57.600]  he's everything to me that's why i call
[19:57.600 --> 20:00.400]  him
[20:00.400 --> 20:13.840]  me
[20:05.840 --> 20:27.840]  man
[20:27.840 --> 20:44.840]  You call him Jeovia, copy his name and you call Rasta, pray to him and he'll deliver.
[20:44.840 --> 20:50.840]  Miracle he work and he work it all over, set the blind free and the deaf hear we.
[20:50.840 --> 20:57.840]  He'll make you sit down and get up walk you see, that your father did and he'll deliver me.
[20:57.840 --> 21:05.840]  Trust in God, me faith in him, tell him you'll probably bless him, call on his name once again.
[21:05.840 --> 21:11.840]  Miracle you know he work with him, he is the king, earth, rightful ruler.
[21:11.840 --> 21:17.840]  That's why I call upon his name every hour, call on his name let him know I am here.
[21:17.840 --> 21:22.840]  That's why I call upon his name every hour, call on his name let him know I am here.
[21:22.840 --> 21:48.840]  Miracle he work and he work it all over, set the blind free and the deaf hear we.
[21:48.840 --> 21:52.840]  Yeah, they basically had the court clerks keep her finger on the mute button
[21:52.840 --> 21:56.840]  and I was having a hard time getting my objections noted on the record
[21:56.840 --> 22:00.840]  and I was trying to get them to make judicial notice on the record
[22:00.840 --> 22:04.840]  that we were being denied our right to be heard, to speak to the allegations
[22:04.840 --> 22:10.840]  of being labeled an organized pseudo-legal commercial argument litigant.
[22:10.840 --> 22:14.840]  Long story short, our motions were dismissed.
[22:14.840 --> 22:22.840]  We were not allowed to speak and our party was labeled OPCA litigants
[22:22.840 --> 22:26.840]  which is in fact an act of discrimination.
[22:26.840 --> 22:32.840]  So after that I was, I'm not going to lie, I was feeling pretty low
[22:32.840 --> 22:34.840]  because I had tried to build a constitutional argument
[22:34.840 --> 22:39.840]  but if you were to look at that argument compared to what I'm writing these days
[22:39.840 --> 22:44.840]  it was very unsophisticated in compared to what I'm writing now.
[22:44.840 --> 22:50.840]  So I had to take a bit of a step back and sort of digest
[22:50.840 --> 22:53.840]  and chew over what I've been learning some more.
[22:53.840 --> 22:58.840]  I went back to my research and came back out and went,
[22:58.840 --> 23:00.840]  okay I know how I need to do this.
[23:00.840 --> 23:07.840]  So, excuse me, I filed additional motions including a motion to change venue
[23:07.840 --> 23:13.840]  because the Justice of the Peace who heard the motion on the day in October
[23:13.840 --> 23:18.840]  and labeled us OPCA actually seized herself on that day
[23:18.840 --> 23:21.840]  so she was going to be our trial judge.
[23:21.840 --> 23:26.840]  So one of the motions that I filed was a motion to change venue
[23:26.840 --> 23:34.840]  because I didn't want to face a bigot, someone who has already decided against us.
[23:34.840 --> 23:42.840]  So I wrote a couple of motions and because they were all constitutional arguments
[23:42.840 --> 23:46.840]  I did file them to the appropriate constitutional characters
[23:46.840 --> 23:50.840]  and then I kind of got a little pissed.
[23:50.840 --> 23:58.840]  So in addition to all that I then wrote a judicial complaint against the Justice of the Peace
[23:58.840 --> 24:01.840]  and I sent it off to the Justice of the Peace Review Council
[24:01.840 --> 24:07.840]  and in addition to the Review Council I sent it to all the constitutional characters.
[24:07.840 --> 24:13.840]  So I sent that in on a Friday night and when I came in on the Tuesday morning
[24:13.840 --> 24:21.840]  that Justice of the Peace who in October was smug, smirked and was everything,
[24:21.840 --> 24:27.840]  it was absolutely contemptuous, came in and she was so pleasant,
[24:27.840 --> 24:34.840]  so helpful bent over backwards to make sure we understood every step of the process.
[24:34.840 --> 24:40.840]  It was complete night and day and then it got really more entertaining
[24:40.840 --> 24:46.840]  because it was a pretty damn powerful judicial complaint
[24:46.840 --> 24:50.840]  that's not even as good as I could do now that I've been practicing.
[24:50.840 --> 25:00.840]  So she comes in and then the prosecutor, we end up going into trial
[25:00.840 --> 25:05.840]  and the prosecutor immediately starts pulling up Meads versus Meads
[25:05.840 --> 25:11.840]  to label me an OPCA litigant again and she proceeds to read several,
[25:11.840 --> 25:14.840]  because what they do is they use syllogism, guys.
[25:14.840 --> 25:19.840]  They have this shopping list of examples of what an OPCA litigant is.
[25:19.840 --> 25:24.840]  They pick three, four or five examples, compare them to something you've done
[25:24.840 --> 25:28.840]  and label you OPCA using that syllogism.
[25:28.840 --> 25:34.840]  So she proceeds to, she reads the first paragraph and as she's reading she goes,
[25:34.840 --> 25:37.840]  and in paragraph 580, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
[25:37.840 --> 25:43.840]  unless the litigant frames that argument in a constitutional context
[25:43.840 --> 25:49.840]  and I just went, did a double-take and went, did she just say what I think she said?
[25:49.840 --> 25:56.840]  Now I know the Meads versus Meads case, but honestly it's 152 pages, 736 paragraphs.
[25:56.840 --> 26:03.840]  I guarantee you I have not read the whole damn thing because you just, you can't consume it, right?
[26:03.840 --> 26:10.840]  So she literally just handed me the needle in the haystack of the Meads versus Meads case.
[26:10.840 --> 26:14.840]  So she finishes her little shopping list and it's my turn to respond.
[26:14.840 --> 26:19.840]  I said, well, before I respond to that, can I have the prosecutor please read to me the number
[26:19.840 --> 26:24.840]  and the paragraph number and first paragraph that she read as an example?
[26:24.840 --> 26:27.840]  And they sort of look at me and I said, I think it was 580?
[26:27.840 --> 26:31.840]  She goes, yes, she reads it again and I looked at the distance of the piece and I went,
[26:31.840 --> 26:37.840]  well, if the prosecutor had taken a moment to look at any of the material that had been filed to this court for today,
[26:37.840 --> 26:45.840]  I think we can all agree that I am not an OPCA litigant as I have framed my arguments in a constitutional context.
[26:45.840 --> 26:51.840]  And the justice of the piece said, no, you are not an OPCA litigant. Bam!
[26:51.840 --> 26:53.840]  Beautiful.
[26:53.840 --> 26:58.840]  I literally got the justice of the piece to rescind it.
[26:58.840 --> 27:06.840]  And then later in the day as the trial went on, I had the evidence on my side
[27:06.840 --> 27:15.840]  and the justice of the piece was making sure she gave me the leeway to get my case established.
[27:15.840 --> 27:21.840]  But I didn't even have to go that far because the prosecutor ended up making a fatal flaw
[27:21.840 --> 27:26.840]  and forgot to get the witness to identify the accused.
[27:26.840 --> 27:28.840]  Okay.
[27:28.840 --> 27:33.840]  So we want a dismissal of motion of non-suit.
[27:33.840 --> 27:35.840]  Yes, absolutely brilliant.
[27:35.840 --> 27:38.840]  I appreciate you taking the time to answer the question.
[27:38.840 --> 27:41.840]  Thank you. Continue the amazing work, Amanda.
[27:41.840 --> 27:44.840]  I'm a big fan and thank you, gentlemen, for the opportunity.
[27:44.840 --> 27:46.840]  I greatly appreciate that.
[27:46.840 --> 27:52.840]  Well, Andre, I'm just going to ask, make sure if you can to start spreading this information to as many people
[27:52.840 --> 27:58.840]  you can listen because I need people to start doing the sort of things I'm doing.
[27:58.840 --> 28:04.840]  We need to start serving in a constitutional way our elected representatives
[28:04.840 --> 28:12.840]  and we need to start serving our officers, our legal officers like the attorney generals
[28:12.840 --> 28:16.840]  when they fail to act in good faith with bar grievances and stuff.
[28:16.840 --> 28:24.840]  So if you can make sure that you start getting people to actually take notice, our pens are swords.
[28:24.840 --> 28:27.840]  We need to know how to wield them.
[28:27.840 --> 28:31.840]  Yes, absolutely. I agree with you entirely.
[28:31.840 --> 28:40.840]  You all will be amazed at how powerful you as a citizen can be.
[28:40.840 --> 28:44.840]  There are so few that even speak to their government.
[28:44.840 --> 28:52.840]  I went to a Senate subcommittee hearing on criminal justice in a state of 29 million people,
[28:52.840 --> 29:05.840]  120 people were there, 105 were lobbyists, 15 citizens out of 29 million showed up to talk to these elected officials.
[29:05.840 --> 29:15.840]  When the lobbyists were speaking, the senators were cleaning their teeth and picking their ears and talking on their phone.
[29:15.840 --> 29:20.840]  But when a citizen stepped up and talked to them, they paid attention.
[29:20.840 --> 29:29.840]  You really have the power to change things, especially if you beat them up. That's even more fun.
[29:29.840 --> 29:36.840]  Oh, honestly, you should hear me. I consider myself a keyboard warrior. You should hear me giggling sometimes.
[29:36.840 --> 29:41.840]  You're living in our house. You do this all the time.
[29:41.840 --> 29:48.840]  I sued a judge recently. I went in and gave him some complaints and played him like a cheap fiddle.
[29:48.840 --> 29:50.840]  That's great. Hang on.
[29:50.840 --> 29:59.840]  Randy Felton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[29:59.840 --> 30:07.840]  Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:07.840 --> 30:13.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment.
[30:13.840 --> 30:18.840]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:18.840 --> 30:23.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:23.840 --> 30:28.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:28.840 --> 30:31.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:31.840 --> 30:39.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:39.840 --> 30:42.840]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:42.840 --> 30:47.840]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:47.840 --> 30:55.840]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:55.840 --> 30:59.840]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[30:59.840 --> 31:06.840]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:06.840 --> 31:09.840]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:09.840 --> 31:15.840]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes.
[31:15.840 --> 31:20.840]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:20.840 --> 31:25.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:29.840 --> 31:34.840]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[31:34.840 --> 31:38.840]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:38.840 --> 31:42.840]  At World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.840 --> 31:46.840]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[31:46.840 --> 31:52.840]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.840 --> 31:55.840]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:55.840 --> 32:00.840]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:00.840 --> 32:06.840]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[32:06.840 --> 32:12.840]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[32:12.840 --> 32:17.840]  where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:17.840 --> 32:24.840]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
[32:24.840 --> 32:28.840]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[32:28.840 --> 32:32.840]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:32.840 --> 32:39.840]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[32:39.840 --> 32:44.840]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.840 --> 32:50.840]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:50.840 --> 32:54.840]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[32:54.840 --> 33:02.840]  on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:24.840 --> 33:29.840]  Music
[33:29.840 --> 33:34.840]  Music
[33:34.840 --> 33:39.840]  Music
[33:39.840 --> 33:44.840]  Music
[33:44.840 --> 33:49.840]  Music
[33:49.840 --> 33:54.840]  Music
[33:54.840 --> 33:59.840]  Music
[33:59.840 --> 34:04.840]  Music
[34:04.840 --> 34:09.840]  Music
[34:09.840 --> 34:20.840]  Music
[34:20.840 --> 34:25.840]  Okay, we are back. Randy Calhoun, Brett Fountain, Woodrow Radio.
[34:25.840 --> 34:33.840]  On this Friday, the 10th day of February, 2023, and we're going to our callers.
[34:33.840 --> 34:41.840]  The call boards are almost empty. Call boards are open. Give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[34:41.840 --> 34:48.840]  We're going to Sweet Non-Charlie's Tina. Hello, Tina.
[34:48.840 --> 34:55.840]  Well, really, Sweet Non-Charlie's Tina, that's the very nicest thing you've said to me.
[34:55.840 --> 35:02.840]  Okay, well, you don't have to worry. I warned Amanda that you speak with a strange foreign accent.
[35:02.840 --> 35:12.840]  Well, so does Amanda. She has that strange Canadian accent, which is kind of similar to the British.
[35:12.840 --> 35:20.840]  That's an interesting, very interesting call. You have some great information,
[35:20.840 --> 35:28.840]  and I really found it fascinating when you said that the Canadians didn't know they had a Constitution.
[35:28.840 --> 35:38.840]  When I first came to America 35 years ago, I did not know, after four years of college in California,
[35:38.840 --> 35:42.840]  they had their own Constitution. I had never been taught that.
[35:42.840 --> 35:51.840]  It was only when I entered into this legal world of foreclosure and madness and Randy's call
[35:51.840 --> 35:59.840]  that I learned that our state had its own Constitution and that I read it. And I spoke to people who said,
[35:59.840 --> 36:04.840]  no, we don't have a Constitution. It's the American Constitution. I said, no, the state has one, too.
[36:04.840 --> 36:14.840]  Have you ever read it? I didn't know about it. It's just truly appalling to me that we're not taught this.
[36:14.840 --> 36:24.840]  We find out way too late. I'm old, and when I went to school, we actually had a social studies class.
[36:24.840 --> 36:33.840]  They actually talked about these things, but that's all been done away with. Yes, it has.
[36:33.840 --> 36:40.840]  Not for home, first. It hasn't. Wait, say that again, Brett. You broke up?
[36:40.840 --> 36:47.840]  I was saying it might be done away with in some places, but not for homeschoolers, it hasn't.
[36:47.840 --> 36:54.840]  Oh, homeschoolers, different. They actually teach. It's not propaganda.
[36:54.840 --> 37:05.840]  And Dr. Graves, who does jurisdictionary, he wants to put together a presentation for high school kids.
[37:05.840 --> 37:12.840]  Actually, I promote Dr. Graves up here in Canada, too, because even though the...
[37:12.840 --> 37:16.840]  And again, this is where I keep saying jurisprudence, jurisprudence.
[37:16.840 --> 37:21.840]  It's the science that you need to focus on, not the theory of law, but the science of law.
[37:21.840 --> 37:29.840]  And yes, the terms are different, but the principles, the formulas are the same.
[37:29.840 --> 37:36.840]  If you're in Canada and you're looking for some direction with just how to do the paperwork,
[37:36.840 --> 37:38.840]  Dr. Graves is a really good source.
[37:38.840 --> 37:43.840]  But if you're looking to understand more about the Constitution and how it affects you,
[37:43.840 --> 37:53.840]  because it does affect you, and the sooner the Canadians understand our Constitution and how it works,
[37:53.840 --> 38:01.840]  the sooner we can hold these elected officials, these Crown attorneys, and these courts to account,
[38:01.840 --> 38:07.840]  because we have to know the rules at this point in order to hold them to the rules.
[38:07.840 --> 38:16.840]  So then I would suggest you come to my website. It's www.canadianlawstudygroup.com.
[38:16.840 --> 38:19.840]  I'm trying to get up information as quickly as I can.
[38:19.840 --> 38:23.840]  I only just actually got the website up and running in the last two weeks,
[38:23.840 --> 38:29.840]  and I've already got a lot of content on there, but I've got a lot more content coming.
[38:29.840 --> 38:34.840]  Good. If anyone is interested and you didn't get that written down,
[38:34.840 --> 38:42.840]  if you'll send me an email and ask me about it, I will send you the address.
[38:42.840 --> 38:46.840]  My email is randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[38:46.840 --> 38:51.840]  Okay, Tina, do you have a question for our guest?
[38:51.840 --> 38:56.840]  Well, not as such for our guest, although I do have a comment.
[38:56.840 --> 39:02.840]  I've been following a person who is actually in Canada right now,
[39:02.840 --> 39:11.840]  who has been a victim of having her child stolen and abducted by someone in California,
[39:11.840 --> 39:19.840]  and they live on this filthy, disgusting boat that he's not allowed to have.
[39:19.840 --> 39:23.840]  She finally got him back, but they're trying to kidnap him again.
[39:23.840 --> 39:31.840]  So she's struggling. She's up there in Canada and struggling to get some legal representation
[39:31.840 --> 39:33.840]  and hide her child from being kidnapped.
[39:33.840 --> 39:40.840]  She wasn't allowed to see him for seven years while he lived in squalor on this boat
[39:40.840 --> 39:43.840]  where he was not really allowed to live on.
[39:43.840 --> 39:48.840]  And it's right, you know, in the Marina del Rey, you know, three or four hours from me.
[39:48.840 --> 39:52.840]  So it's been an interesting thing to follow.
[39:52.840 --> 40:00.840]  And maybe I need to try to get her in touch with you just so that maybe you can help her.
[40:00.840 --> 40:05.840]  I don't know, but, you know, her story is absolutely appalling.
[40:05.840 --> 40:11.840]  I'm not as versed on family law, just to qualify myself.
[40:11.840 --> 40:14.840]  I dig around in the Criminal Code quite a bit.
[40:14.840 --> 40:17.840]  I dig around in the Provincial Offenses Act quite a bit,
[40:17.840 --> 40:20.840]  and I dig around in the things like the Municipal Code stuff quite a bit.
[40:20.840 --> 40:23.840]  But family law, that's another beast.
[40:23.840 --> 40:28.840]  And it's not to say that I don't have some, you know, some ideas and concepts about it.
[40:28.840 --> 40:35.840]  It's not an area that I truly study except to say that the family courts
[40:35.840 --> 40:39.840]  do appear to be some of the most corrupt courts.
[40:39.840 --> 40:48.840]  I was once paid to go down to Australia and do some seminars down there.
[40:48.840 --> 40:55.840]  They picked me up at the Sydney Airport, and we drove over to the Sydney Bay Bridge.
[40:55.840 --> 41:01.840]  And up on the bridge was a guy up there with these huge banners
[41:01.840 --> 41:07.840]  talking about how corrupt the family courts in Australia were.
[41:07.840 --> 41:10.840]  And there were cops all over trying to get him down.
[41:10.840 --> 41:17.840]  Everywhere I go, they complain that the family courts are the most corrupt in the country.
[41:17.840 --> 41:20.840]  So it's pretty consistent.
[41:20.840 --> 41:26.840]  Yes, but hopefully I can ask you a couple of little questions
[41:26.840 --> 41:30.840]  that are not related to your guest who I've really, really enjoyed listening to.
[41:30.840 --> 41:36.840]  So I hope somebody puts up the recording so I can listen again.
[41:36.840 --> 41:38.840]  And thank you for coming on here.
[41:38.840 --> 41:41.840]  It's really great to hear new information.
[41:41.840 --> 41:47.840]  But my question is in regard to the case I'm in right now
[41:47.840 --> 41:57.840]  where the consignment store and I had an adversary proceeding that I filed in her bankruptcy.
[41:57.840 --> 42:00.840]  And we've kept her and her husband from getting the bankruptcy
[42:00.840 --> 42:04.840]  discharged for the last three and a half years.
[42:04.840 --> 42:07.840]  Would you to go to trial on March 15th?
[42:07.840 --> 42:10.840]  We have a pretrial hearing on March 8th.
[42:10.840 --> 42:17.840]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, pretrial hearing on a bankruptcy,
[42:17.840 --> 42:23.840]  the adversarial proceeding in the bankruptcy or on her criminal prosecution?
[42:23.840 --> 42:25.840]  No, not the criminal.
[42:25.840 --> 42:27.840]  The criminal is still going ahead.
[42:27.840 --> 42:32.840]  She tried to have that dismissed and it was denied on the same day
[42:32.840 --> 42:40.840]  I had to send her my joint pretrial stipulation that we're supposed to collaborate on.
[42:40.840 --> 42:48.840]  And she got the notice in the morning that her attorney's motion to dismiss criminal case was denied.
[42:48.840 --> 42:56.840]  And then in the evening she got my joint, my copy of the joint pretrial stipulation.
[42:56.840 --> 43:00.840]  She had refused to meet and confer about it.
[43:00.840 --> 43:03.840]  So I sent her my version of it.
[43:03.840 --> 43:08.840]  And I've got to tell you, that is the hardest document I've ever had to write.
[43:08.840 --> 43:14.840]  And it took me at least about 30 hours to get it right because you really,
[43:14.840 --> 43:17.840]  I mean, there's so many rules and regulations for it.
[43:17.840 --> 43:20.840]  But I worked hard on it and got it done.
[43:20.840 --> 43:29.840]  And my question is, you know, this her and her husband do not care if they get sanctioned.
[43:29.840 --> 43:30.840]  They don't care about money.
[43:30.840 --> 43:33.840]  They've got state tax liens, federal tax liens,
[43:33.840 --> 43:38.840]  and you're trying to run me off the paper and I'm not going to allow it.
[43:38.840 --> 43:40.840]  I'm jumping in here.
[43:40.840 --> 43:42.840]  Okay.
[43:42.840 --> 43:47.840]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, call lines are open.
[43:47.840 --> 43:51.840]  Our call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[43:51.840 --> 43:53.840]  And Tina always runs us off the cliff.
[43:53.840 --> 43:55.840]  It's always her fault.
[43:55.840 --> 44:00.840]  We'll be right back.
[44:00.840 --> 44:04.840]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[44:04.840 --> 44:06.840]  except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.840 --> 44:09.840]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[44:09.840 --> 44:11.840]  And it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.840 --> 44:17.840]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.840 --> 44:22.840]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.840 --> 44:25.840]  longevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.840 --> 44:29.840]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[44:29.840 --> 44:31.840]  most of which we reject.
[44:31.840 --> 44:34.840]  We have come to trust longevity so much,
[44:34.840 --> 44:39.840]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.840 --> 44:42.840]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[44:42.840 --> 44:47.840]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:47.840 --> 44:51.840]  As you realize the benefits of longevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.840 --> 44:54.840]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[44:54.840 --> 44:58.840]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:58.840 --> 45:00.840]  Order now.
[45:00.840 --> 45:03.840]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.840 --> 45:07.840]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.840 --> 45:15.840]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.840 --> 45:18.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.840 --> 45:22.840]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:22.840 --> 45:27.840]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:27.840 --> 45:33.840]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:33.840 --> 45:38.840]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.840 --> 45:42.840]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:42.840 --> 45:47.840]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[45:47.840 --> 45:51.840]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:51.840 --> 46:18.840]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:18.840 --> 46:21.840]  Thank you.
[46:48.840 --> 46:51.840]  Thank you.
[46:51.840 --> 46:54.840]  Thank you.
[46:54.840 --> 46:57.840]  Thank you.
[46:57.840 --> 47:24.840]  Thank you.
[47:24.840 --> 47:29.840]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio,
[47:29.840 --> 47:33.840]  and we're talking to Tina in California.
[47:33.840 --> 47:35.840]  Okay, Tina.
[47:35.840 --> 47:42.840]  Okay, so this family, the whole family, the wife, husband, mother, father, sister,
[47:42.840 --> 47:45.840]  they've all got judgments against them.
[47:45.840 --> 47:49.840]  They don't care that they have monetary judgments.
[47:49.840 --> 47:53.840]  They're not going to pay them, and they just assume that, you know,
[47:53.840 --> 47:55.840]  they'll eventually go away.
[47:55.840 --> 48:02.840]  Now, the court ordered, in the British order, he said,
[48:02.840 --> 48:06.840]  it's ordered that a pretrial conference meeting is set for March 8th.
[48:06.840 --> 48:14.840]  It's ordered that everyone appears in person because the,
[48:14.840 --> 48:22.840]  although Andrea has appeared before, her husband has never appeared in any hearing.
[48:22.840 --> 48:29.840]  It is ordered that all parties must complete a joint pretrial stipulation
[48:29.840 --> 48:33.840]  and file the pretrial stipulation by no later than February 8th
[48:33.840 --> 48:36.840]  in accordance with the rules.
[48:36.840 --> 48:40.840]  It is ordered that the parties may formulate the joint pretrial stipulation
[48:40.840 --> 48:45.840]  based upon the model posted on this other judge's section.
[48:45.840 --> 48:49.840]  It is ordered that all parties, including all plaintiffs and all defendants,
[48:49.840 --> 48:52.840]  and he aborted that, are ordered to appear in person.
[48:52.840 --> 49:00.840]  Now, she refused to respond to the meet and confer request I had.
[49:00.840 --> 49:07.840]  So I, you know, made up our joint pretrial stipulation,
[49:07.840 --> 49:12.840]  emailed it to her and said, please respond accordingly, ignored.
[49:12.840 --> 49:14.840]  Wait, wait, hold on.
[49:14.840 --> 49:18.840]  Tina, are you using that Bluetooth?
[49:18.840 --> 49:27.840]  Yeah, let me turn it off one on one second, see if I can figure out how to.
[49:27.840 --> 49:30.840]  She always uses that Bluetooth.
[49:30.840 --> 49:36.840]  Because it's so much easier than, I can do three things at once that way.
[49:36.840 --> 49:39.840]  But it gives you a real, it sounds like your head's in a toilet or something,
[49:39.840 --> 49:41.840]  a real hollow sound.
[49:41.840 --> 49:45.840]  Is it better?
[49:45.840 --> 49:46.840]  Talk more.
[49:46.840 --> 49:48.840]  Can the Bluetooth be better?
[49:48.840 --> 49:50.840]  Oh, much better, much better.
[49:50.840 --> 49:51.840]  Okay.
[49:51.840 --> 49:52.840]  Okay.
[49:52.840 --> 49:56.840]  So the judge clearly ordered us to do this.
[49:56.840 --> 50:00.840]  And she has not responded whatsoever.
[50:00.840 --> 50:06.840]  I'm sure she's pretty upset that she got her motion to dismiss the criminal file denied.
[50:06.840 --> 50:12.840]  And I'm sure on that same day when she got this joint pretrial stipulation,
[50:12.840 --> 50:16.840]  when she read what was in it, she's probably still a little teased.
[50:16.840 --> 50:18.840]  But it doesn't matter.
[50:18.840 --> 50:20.840]  The judge ordered it.
[50:20.840 --> 50:27.840]  Now, I filed a unilateral one because she hadn't responded.
[50:27.840 --> 50:30.840]  I filed the exhibit.
[50:30.840 --> 50:32.840]  I filed a proposed order.
[50:32.840 --> 50:39.840]  And I also filed a declaration abiding the attempts I made to contact them,
[50:39.840 --> 50:41.840]  because she refuses to speak on the phone.
[50:41.840 --> 50:51.840]  My question is, if she does not turn up on March the 8th, which she's ordered to,
[50:51.840 --> 51:01.840]  you know, can we ask the judge on how do we politely ask the judge to maybe, you know,
[51:01.840 --> 51:04.840]  impose a jail term on her?
[51:04.840 --> 51:07.840]  Because clearly it says that she could be sanctioned,
[51:07.840 --> 51:11.840]  but that means nothing to them because they're not going to pay it anyway.
[51:11.840 --> 51:14.840]  Jail term is what they're terrified of.
[51:14.840 --> 51:18.840]  Ask her to be, ask the judge to hold her in contempt.
[51:18.840 --> 51:19.840]  Okay.
[51:19.840 --> 51:21.840]  Well, what does that mean?
[51:21.840 --> 51:23.840]  That's what I was thinking of doing, but...
[51:23.840 --> 51:27.840]  It means they toss her behind in jail.
[51:27.840 --> 51:30.840]  Mm-hmm.
[51:30.840 --> 51:35.840]  That's generally what you get for contempt.
[51:35.840 --> 51:38.840]  It's to be jailed.
[51:38.840 --> 51:48.840]  What's the best way to ask without, you know, making the judge, you know, turn against you?
[51:48.840 --> 51:50.840]  Because she's clearly...
[51:50.840 --> 51:53.840]  I mean, they've lied throughout the bankruptcy proceeding.
[51:53.840 --> 51:55.840]  We have exposed the lies.
[51:55.840 --> 51:57.840]  We have exposed so many things.
[51:57.840 --> 52:02.840]  You've not discovered that they're lying about the vehicles that they drive.
[52:02.840 --> 52:06.840]  Okay, Tina, here you're not dealing with public officials.
[52:06.840 --> 52:12.840]  So with public officials, the judge will always have a dog in the hunt.
[52:12.840 --> 52:17.840]  Here you're dealing in a civil case with two citizens.
[52:17.840 --> 52:23.840]  In this case, the judge doesn't have any dog in this hunt.
[52:23.840 --> 52:25.840]  He don't care who wins what.
[52:25.840 --> 52:32.840]  And turning him against this woman who ignored his order?
[52:32.840 --> 52:33.840]  Mm-hmm.
[52:33.840 --> 52:38.840]  Federal judges get ugly when you ignore their orders.
[52:38.840 --> 52:40.840]  Mm-hmm.
[52:40.840 --> 52:42.840]  It kind of hurts their feelings.
[52:42.840 --> 52:46.840]  You don't think I'm important enough to obey my order?
[52:46.840 --> 52:51.840]  Asking for a contempt order against her and tell the judge,
[52:51.840 --> 52:55.840]  it doesn't matter if you sanction her, she's not going to pay anything anyway.
[52:55.840 --> 52:59.840]  So asking for a contempt charge.
[52:59.840 --> 53:01.840]  Okay.
[53:01.840 --> 53:06.840]  So that's what I was thinking, that that might be the way to go.
[53:06.840 --> 53:08.840]  Because we're only...
[53:08.840 --> 53:15.840]  When we mixed a week before the supported trial, if she doesn't turn up,
[53:15.840 --> 53:19.840]  she could give us a default judgment.
[53:19.840 --> 53:23.840]  But it means nothing unless he does it with Ford and Rico,
[53:23.840 --> 53:27.840]  because then she can't dismiss him in another bankruptcy.
[53:27.840 --> 53:30.840]  Because if he doesn't do that, she's just going to wait seven years
[53:30.840 --> 53:33.840]  and then not pay us and then say,
[53:33.840 --> 53:40.840]  oh, I'm just going to file another bankruptcy and, you know, discharge your judgment.
[53:40.840 --> 53:47.840]  So we were trying to figure out how we can get this done and, you know,
[53:47.840 --> 53:52.840]  actually just get her jailed and her husband jailed.
[53:52.840 --> 53:58.840]  And can we ask the judge to, at this late stage,
[53:58.840 --> 54:05.840]  to require them to bring in their proof of registration of vehicle?
[54:05.840 --> 54:12.840]  Because they've clearly lied on their bankruptcy about which vehicles they drive.
[54:12.840 --> 54:17.840]  And is that something that we could ask the judge to require?
[54:17.840 --> 54:25.840]  Absolutely, because that goes to your ability to collect a judgment.
[54:25.840 --> 54:28.840]  Okay.
[54:28.840 --> 54:32.840]  If they have assets, they need to declare those assets.
[54:32.840 --> 54:36.840]  And then if you're getting a judgment against her,
[54:36.840 --> 54:40.840]  then you can put a lead on the assets.
[54:40.840 --> 54:44.840]  Yeah, and if they still make payments on it...
[54:44.840 --> 54:49.840]  And Randy, what about if she lied?
[54:49.840 --> 54:51.840]  May the...
[54:51.840 --> 54:54.840]  If the judge finds that she lied to the court?
[54:54.840 --> 54:58.840]  So under penalties of perjury.
[54:58.840 --> 55:02.840]  Exactly.
[55:02.840 --> 55:12.840]  You can ask the court to ask the local, ask the state to search their database
[55:12.840 --> 55:16.840]  for any vehicles that are registered in these people's names.
[55:16.840 --> 55:18.840]  Okay.
[55:18.840 --> 55:20.840]  Or you can get a private detective to do that,
[55:20.840 --> 55:24.840]  and they'll do it for about 25 bucks or so.
[55:24.840 --> 55:26.840]  Okay.
[55:26.840 --> 55:28.840]  We could try that if I could find one.
[55:28.840 --> 55:31.840]  I was trying to try to look for one.
[55:31.840 --> 55:33.840]  But I mean, she just...
[55:33.840 --> 55:36.840]  And this is a person that we discovered,
[55:36.840 --> 55:42.840]  known for their discovery in bank papers.
[55:42.840 --> 55:48.840]  They filed for Chapter 7 in June of 2019.
[55:48.840 --> 55:56.840]  In April and May, they had over $50,000 deposited into their bank account,
[55:56.840 --> 56:01.840]  and they withdrew most of it through cash withdrawal.
[56:01.840 --> 56:09.840]  So we highlighted that, you know, summarized it with the criminal, you know, people,
[56:09.840 --> 56:15.840]  and we've highlighted and put into our pretrust stipulation to show that, you know,
[56:15.840 --> 56:18.840]  how are they saying they can't pay the creditors
[56:18.840 --> 56:23.840]  when they've had over $50,000 deposited two months before they filed bankruptcy
[56:23.840 --> 56:26.840]  and then taken most of it out in cash.
[56:26.840 --> 56:28.840]  Where did that cash go?
[56:28.840 --> 56:30.840]  Yeah, you can't...
[56:30.840 --> 56:33.840]  You know, that's too close to the bankruptcy.
[56:33.840 --> 56:41.840]  That could get them put in jail for hiding assets from the bankruptcy court.
[56:41.840 --> 56:44.840]  And the bankruptcy court just like, we don't see any assets.
[56:44.840 --> 56:50.840]  So there's no money in it for us, so we really don't care, and they're ready to dismiss.
[56:50.840 --> 56:53.840]  If you can come to them with evidence of assets,
[56:53.840 --> 56:56.840]  then you can get the bankruptcy court's attention.
[56:56.840 --> 57:05.840]  But this person doesn't have enough assets to get the trustee excited.
[57:05.840 --> 57:06.840]  No.
[57:06.840 --> 57:09.840]  If she had a million in assets, that would get him excited,
[57:09.840 --> 57:17.840]  but if she's pretty well broke, there's not enough there for him to care about.
[57:17.840 --> 57:22.840]  But, you know, the fact that she's just buying and hiding assets,
[57:22.840 --> 57:27.840]  no matter how small, you know, it should go in jail
[57:27.840 --> 57:30.840]  and it should get their bankruptcy denied.
[57:30.840 --> 57:34.840]  And that's what one part, you know, adversary proceeding,
[57:34.840 --> 57:37.840]  we want the bankruptcy discharge denied.
[57:37.840 --> 57:40.840]  And we look up there.
[57:40.840 --> 57:44.840]  And I tell you what, I have learned so much during this case,
[57:44.840 --> 57:49.840]  but it's really hard to do an adversary proceeding.
[57:49.840 --> 57:54.840]  And, you know, I wouldn't advise it to anyone.
[57:54.840 --> 57:57.840]  We'll stop the clip again, but I'll let you go do another call-out
[57:57.840 --> 57:59.840]  because you've answered my question.
[57:59.840 --> 58:00.840]  Okay.
[58:00.840 --> 58:02.840]  Thank you very much, Tina.
[58:02.840 --> 58:06.840]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio.
[58:06.840 --> 58:10.840]  Our call board is pretty well empty today.
[58:10.840 --> 58:12.840]  That's unusual.
[58:12.840 --> 58:15.840]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[58:15.840 --> 58:20.840]  I call at number 512-646-1984.
[58:20.840 --> 58:24.840]  We've got another full hour.
[58:24.840 --> 58:25.840]  Yeah, so what's 11?
[58:25.840 --> 58:26.840]  We've got another hour.
[58:26.840 --> 58:29.840]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[58:29.840 --> 58:30.840]  Hang on.
[58:30.840 --> 58:33.840]  We'll be right back.
[58:33.840 --> 58:40.840]  Unless you have something insightful to say, Brett, in the next 10 seconds.
[58:40.840 --> 58:45.840]  Well, you might invite people to realize that we have Amanda reading with us.
[58:45.840 --> 58:49.840]  So if you have questions for her, that might be good, too.
[58:49.840 --> 58:53.840]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.840 --> 58:56.840]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:56.840 --> 59:00.840]  and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.840 --> 59:05.840]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:05.840 --> 59:09.840]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.840 --> 59:13.840]  that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.840 --> 59:18.840]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.840 --> 59:21.840]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.840 --> 59:27.840]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.840 --> 59:33.840]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.840 --> 59:40.840]  call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.840 --> 59:44.840]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.840 --> 59:49.840]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.840 --> 59:59.840]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.840 --> 01:00:05.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.840 --> 01:00:08.840]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:08.840 --> 01:00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.840 --> 01:00:13.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:00:13.840 --> 01:00:16.840]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:16.840 --> 01:00:18.840]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:18.840 --> 01:00:21.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:21.840 --> 01:00:26.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:26.840 --> 01:00:32.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.840 --> 01:00:34.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:00:34.840 --> 01:00:38.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:00:38.840 --> 01:00:42.840]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:42.840 --> 01:00:45.840]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:48.840]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.840 --> 01:00:51.840]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:54.840]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:54.840 --> 01:00:57.840]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed
[01:00:57.840 --> 01:01:00.840]  reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.840 --> 01:01:03.840]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[01:01:03.840 --> 01:01:06.840]  a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:06.840 --> 01:01:09.840]  Third party, Third Amendment? Get it?
[01:01:09.840 --> 01:01:12.840]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:12.840 --> 01:01:16.840]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:16.840 --> 01:01:31.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.840 --> 01:01:35.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.840 --> 01:01:38.840]  They guarantee a specific freedom Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:38.840 --> 01:01:40.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.840 --> 01:01:43.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:01:43.840 --> 01:01:46.840]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:02:14.840 --> 01:02:18.840]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars,
[01:02:18.840 --> 01:02:21.840]  a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:21.840 --> 01:02:25.840]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:25.840 --> 01:02:27.840]  from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:27.840 --> 01:02:30.840]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[01:02:30.840 --> 01:02:33.840]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[01:02:33.840 --> 01:02:37.840]  in the name of security, case in point, TSA airport scanners
[01:02:37.840 --> 01:02:39.840]  that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:39.840 --> 01:02:42.840]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:42.840 --> 01:02:46.840]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:46.840 --> 01:02:49.840]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:53.840]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.840 --> 01:03:13.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:23.840 --> 01:03:49.840]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:49.840 --> 01:03:56.840]  Randy Kelton and Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, here with Amanda Ridding.
[01:03:56.840 --> 01:04:00.840]  I didn't wait for that bumper music to go down.
[01:04:00.840 --> 01:04:02.840]  Okay, now it's gone.
[01:04:02.840 --> 01:04:08.840]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton and Brett Fountain here with a special guest, Amanda Ridding.
[01:04:08.840 --> 01:04:13.840]  And I'm looking at your website and I see this Bill C-11.
[01:04:13.840 --> 01:04:17.840]  On its face, Bill C-11 appears to be unconstitutional.
[01:04:17.840 --> 01:04:19.840]  Can you tell us about that?
[01:04:19.840 --> 01:04:23.840]  So Bill C-11, it has a lot built into it.
[01:04:23.840 --> 01:04:25.840]  It is a censorship bill.
[01:04:25.840 --> 01:04:33.840]  It also will help to usher in digital ID and the digital credit system
[01:04:33.840 --> 01:04:35.840]  that, of course, everyone is concerned about
[01:04:35.840 --> 01:04:40.840]  when you start thinking about Agenda 21 and Agenda 30.
[01:04:40.840 --> 01:04:45.840]  And it's being ushered in on the municipal level.
[01:04:45.840 --> 01:04:51.840]  So during the break, as I was mentioning, in Canada,
[01:04:51.840 --> 01:04:55.840]  they used to have different municipal acts.
[01:04:55.840 --> 01:04:58.840]  And it looks, and now I haven't checked every province,
[01:04:58.840 --> 01:05:04.840]  but the provinces I've gone in and looked at, Alberta, British Columbia,
[01:05:04.840 --> 01:05:10.840]  I think there's one or two others, right about the late 90s, early 2000s.
[01:05:10.840 --> 01:05:12.840]  So in Ontario, it was 2001.
[01:05:12.840 --> 01:05:15.840]  I want to say British Columbia was 2000.
[01:05:15.840 --> 01:05:18.840]  They repealed and replaced the Municipal Act.
[01:05:18.840 --> 01:05:26.840]  When they did it, they basically severed the constitutional authority
[01:05:26.840 --> 01:05:28.840]  over the municipalities.
[01:05:28.840 --> 01:05:34.840]  And the municipalities, which used to be a body politic, became corporations.
[01:05:34.840 --> 01:05:41.840]  And in so doing, they became body corporates instead of body politics.
[01:05:41.840 --> 01:05:49.840]  The character or creature of mayor no longer exists in the Municipal Act 2001 in Ontario.
[01:05:49.840 --> 01:05:55.840]  That character is now known as the head of council, but they didn't tell anybody.
[01:05:55.840 --> 01:06:00.840]  So what happens is when we have an election for the municipality,
[01:06:00.840 --> 01:06:02.840]  the people are still running for mayor.
[01:06:02.840 --> 01:06:06.840]  But the problem is there's no such creature as mayor in law.
[01:06:06.840 --> 01:06:08.840]  It doesn't exist.
[01:06:08.840 --> 01:06:14.840]  What you're really voting for is the head of council for a body corporate.
[01:06:14.840 --> 01:06:22.840]  So it's really one of the things that I'm working on right now is establishing the arguments there
[01:06:22.840 --> 01:06:25.840]  to take it to the legislatures, to take it to the MPs,
[01:06:25.840 --> 01:06:31.840]  and if necessary, to take it to the courts with its constitutional challenge
[01:06:31.840 --> 01:06:38.840]  because the municipalities are probably the most devoid of the,
[01:06:38.840 --> 01:06:41.840]  the government most devoid of the constitutional authority when, in fact,
[01:06:41.840 --> 01:06:48.840]  they are supposed to be consistent with Section 92, subsection 8 of the Constitution.
[01:06:48.840 --> 01:06:54.840]  And while I'm talking about it, if you guys don't mind my just going on for a few more minutes,
[01:06:54.840 --> 01:06:56.840]  I talk about the mayor.
[01:06:56.840 --> 01:06:59.840]  Mayors no longer exist in Ontario.
[01:06:59.840 --> 01:07:01.840]  They're known as head of councils.
[01:07:01.840 --> 01:07:04.840]  That's what their actual legal title is.
[01:07:04.840 --> 01:07:12.840]  The title of prime minister and the titles of premier, those are ceremonial.
[01:07:12.840 --> 01:07:19.840]  There is nowhere in the Constitution, nowhere in Canadian statute that I have been able to find
[01:07:19.840 --> 01:07:24.840]  that creates and establishes the character of prime minister,
[01:07:24.840 --> 01:07:28.840]  that creates and establishes the character of premier,
[01:07:28.840 --> 01:07:32.840]  which means those creatures in law have no standing in law.
[01:07:32.840 --> 01:07:40.840]  We as constitutional monarchies truly are countries that govern ourselves.
[01:07:40.840 --> 01:07:43.840]  We the people govern ourselves.
[01:07:43.840 --> 01:07:50.840]  And the only authority the monarch has is to protect and preserve the customs
[01:07:50.840 --> 01:07:54.840]  and common law of Canada pursuant to the coronation oath.
[01:07:54.840 --> 01:07:59.840]  And once the coronation oath was sworn and signed, the crown was forever bound.
[01:07:59.840 --> 01:08:09.840]  Until such time, the crown steps away.
[01:08:09.840 --> 01:08:11.840]  Did you like that little?
[01:08:11.840 --> 01:08:13.840]  I'm not sure what that means.
[01:08:13.840 --> 01:08:15.840]  The crown steps away.
[01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:17.840]  Well, I mean, here's the thing.
[01:08:17.840 --> 01:08:24.840]  No, because it's a contract, think of it, a constitution in essence is contract.
[01:08:24.840 --> 01:08:29.840]  And as long as all the parties are going to remain in the contract,
[01:08:29.840 --> 01:08:33.840]  no changes can happen to the contract without an amendment,
[01:08:33.840 --> 01:08:36.840]  and then all parties have to agree in order for the amendment to happen.
[01:08:36.840 --> 01:08:39.840]  That's what a constitutional amendment is.
[01:08:39.840 --> 01:08:42.840]  But if someone says, you know what, I'm done with this contract,
[01:08:42.840 --> 01:08:45.840]  then you can't force them necessarily.
[01:08:45.840 --> 01:08:48.840]  You might be able to, depending on the nature of the contract.
[01:08:48.840 --> 01:08:54.840]  But in essence, if the crown doesn't want the job of preserving
[01:08:54.840 --> 01:08:56.840]  and maintaining the common law of Canada anymore,
[01:08:56.840 --> 01:08:59.840]  you can't force them against their will to do it.
[01:08:59.840 --> 01:09:07.840]  And that said, in a perfect world, if I were to say there would be one change,
[01:09:07.840 --> 01:09:12.840]  one or two changes that I would, because I wouldn't change much to our constitution,
[01:09:12.840 --> 01:09:15.840]  but if there were one or two changes I would make,
[01:09:15.840 --> 01:09:24.840]  it would be that the title of governor general and the crown would be merged into one,
[01:09:24.840 --> 01:09:30.840]  and the person who holds that position would have to be eligible
[01:09:30.840 --> 01:09:34.840]  with knowledge and skill at law to hold that position.
[01:09:34.840 --> 01:09:39.840]  In other words, they'd have to be a jurist, and they would have to be elected.
[01:09:39.840 --> 01:09:42.840]  They have no authority to tell us what to do.
[01:09:42.840 --> 01:09:47.840]  They only have the authority to preserve and maintain the customs and common law of Canada.
[01:09:47.840 --> 01:09:54.840]  That's what the crown's job is.
[01:09:54.840 --> 01:10:02.840]  So I take it the crown has another agenda?
[01:10:02.840 --> 01:10:09.840]  Well, I think when you go into the Bill C-11, there's a few things going on here.
[01:10:09.840 --> 01:10:14.840]  And I got this little bit of history from, for those who don't know,
[01:10:14.840 --> 01:10:18.840]  I'm actually a real estate agent, and I got this little bit of history from another real estate agent,
[01:10:18.840 --> 01:10:23.840]  and he actually got a copy of the Order of Council I'm going to talk about
[01:10:23.840 --> 01:10:28.840]  under our Freedom of Information Act, and he shared it with me.
[01:10:28.840 --> 01:10:33.840]  So I have seen it, and I know he's telling me the truth because I verified it.
[01:10:33.840 --> 01:10:39.840]  Back in 1940, during the war, Mackenzie King, the prime minister,
[01:10:39.840 --> 01:10:44.840]  the alleged prime minister of the day, a couple of things happened.
[01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:51.840]  We had the clerk of the Privy Council, who was in essence the governor general's clerk,
[01:10:51.840 --> 01:10:53.840]  retire after 21 years.
[01:10:53.840 --> 01:10:58.840]  Now, you guys would probably be aware that the clerks probably know the rules best.
[01:10:58.840 --> 01:11:03.840]  So this clerk retired, and then shortly after the clerk retired,
[01:11:03.840 --> 01:11:12.840]  the governor general of the day died very unexpectedly in an accident of all things.
[01:11:12.840 --> 01:11:16.840]  He slipped in his bathroom and hit his head on the bathtub.
[01:11:16.840 --> 01:11:19.840]  Make of it what you will.
[01:11:19.840 --> 01:11:25.840]  But the governor, so the clerk is gone, the governor general is dead,
[01:11:25.840 --> 01:11:30.840]  there's no one left to know how that office is supposed to operate.
[01:11:30.840 --> 01:11:35.840]  Mackenzie King comes slipping in, and he throws in this Order of Council
[01:11:35.840 --> 01:11:42.840]  and brings in some guy to run the, a new clerk of the Privy Council,
[01:11:42.840 --> 01:11:48.840]  and with the new clerk, who doesn't necessarily know the rules of the Constitution,
[01:11:48.840 --> 01:11:56.840]  then turns around and takes it upon himself to appoint the next governor general.
[01:11:56.840 --> 01:11:59.840]  Now, what, what, that doesn't mean anything to most people,
[01:11:59.840 --> 01:12:03.840]  but what it should mean, what people need to understand is that the governor general
[01:12:03.840 --> 01:12:08.840]  is supposed to be acting on behalf and in the name of the monarch,
[01:12:08.840 --> 01:12:12.840]  which means the monarch is supposed to be the one who picks their own representatives.
[01:12:12.840 --> 01:12:23.840]  But with our prime minister taking advantage of these untimely events and, and, and retirements,
[01:12:23.840 --> 01:12:28.840]  the, they, they took, they stepped in, in front of the monarch,
[01:12:28.840 --> 01:12:31.840]  and took over who's going to appoint the governor general.
[01:12:31.840 --> 01:12:36.840]  So where the governor general is supposed to be separate and independent from the,
[01:12:36.840 --> 01:12:42.840]  from the House of Commons, the leader of the reigning party now appoints it,
[01:12:42.840 --> 01:12:50.840]  and really the governor general just becomes the puppet of the, the, the reigning party.
[01:12:50.840 --> 01:12:54.840]  Then you have, then you flash forward.
[01:12:54.840 --> 01:12:58.840]  So, so they're starting to, they're starting to lay the groundwork.
[01:12:58.840 --> 01:13:02.840]  They, they're, but of course these changes take time.
[01:13:02.840 --> 01:13:04.840]  So there are some things that potentially were slipped through,
[01:13:04.840 --> 01:13:09.840]  but what really got slipped through didn't really hit until 1985.
[01:13:09.840 --> 01:13:16.840]  And in 1985, the Mulrooney government started slipping in all these consolidated acts,
[01:13:16.840 --> 01:13:20.840]  including one called the Revised Statutes Canada Act.
[01:13:20.840 --> 01:13:30.840]  And with this act, they essentially finished breaking the link between the governor general and the crown.
[01:13:30.840 --> 01:13:32.840]  Why is this significant?
[01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:39.840]  Because bills of appropriation in Canada are supposed, they can, they can be approved by the governor general,
[01:13:39.840 --> 01:13:45.840]  but if they're approved by the governor general, the governor general is supposed to then send it to England for the,
[01:13:45.840 --> 01:13:54.840]  for the review by the crown in order to, for the crown to determine that it does conform to common law.
[01:13:54.840 --> 01:13:57.840]  And if it doesn't, the crown is supposed to veto it.
[01:13:57.840 --> 01:14:02.840]  So if you are, if you are skipping that step and you control,
[01:14:02.840 --> 01:14:05.840]  you're literally the puppet master of the governor general,
[01:14:05.840 --> 01:14:10.840]  the governor general is just going to rubber stamp all the laws regardless of whether or not they're constitutional.
[01:14:10.840 --> 01:14:16.840]  And that's exactly what's happening in Canada right now.
[01:14:16.840 --> 01:14:20.840]  So what would be the remedy?
[01:14:20.840 --> 01:14:25.840]  Section 52, subsection 1, any law that is inconsistent with the Supreme Law of Canada,
[01:14:25.840 --> 01:14:32.840]  the constitution is to the extent of the inconsistency of no force in effect and you're going to have to push it through.
[01:14:32.840 --> 01:14:36.840]  And again, it's the same remedies that I'm already coming up with,
[01:14:36.840 --> 01:14:41.840]  unless I can dream up any more and I'm constantly thinking of new ways of hitting it, hitting it,
[01:14:41.840 --> 01:14:47.840]  of course, with starting with constitutional challenges directly with the legislature to help build the case.
[01:14:47.840 --> 01:14:55.840]  If they don't conform, take it to judicial review for constitutional challenge to get the, to get the court
[01:14:55.840 --> 01:15:03.840]  to order the legislature to repeal and or revoke whatever, whatever laws are inconsistent.
[01:15:03.840 --> 01:15:14.840]  And of course, in the meantime, if the, if the law officers of our country who are supposed to,
[01:15:14.840 --> 01:15:18.840]  and let me just focus on those law officers again for a moment.
[01:15:18.840 --> 01:15:26.840]  The Minister of Justice, the attorney generals, Canada and the provinces, they are all law officers.
[01:15:26.840 --> 01:15:30.840]  They are all attorneys at law.
[01:15:30.840 --> 01:15:40.840]  And the Minister of Justice is ex officio, His Majesty the King under section 2, subsection 2,
[01:15:40.840 --> 01:15:45.840]  which means by virtue of his office, he is His Majesty the King.
[01:15:45.840 --> 01:15:55.840]  And by virtue of his office, he is supposed to protect the Canadian, the customs and common law of Canada.
[01:15:55.840 --> 01:16:04.840]  And the attorney generals, they act as the law, the attorneys on behalf of His Majesty.
[01:16:04.840 --> 01:16:09.840]  So if you bring this to their attention and you make it clear to them that as an act of good faith,
[01:16:09.840 --> 01:16:15.840]  they better fix this because it's actually their job to maintain and preserve the common law of Canada.
[01:16:15.840 --> 01:16:22.840]  If they fail to fix it, then again, along with going after the legislatures, along with going after the courts,
[01:16:22.840 --> 01:16:29.840]  I'm starting to think we need to start doing bar grievances against these attorneys at law.
[01:16:29.840 --> 01:16:36.840]  Because they're literally not only breaking the constitution and the constitutional law,
[01:16:36.840 --> 01:16:44.840]  but they're also breaking their oath of their law office.
[01:16:44.840 --> 01:16:49.840]  And having said that, they're actually, and dare I go out on a limb here,
[01:16:49.840 --> 01:16:56.840]  they're actually potentially committing treason of the government of the people of Canada.
[01:16:56.840 --> 01:16:59.840]  Okay, hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:16:59.840 --> 01:17:04.840]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.840 --> 01:17:08.840]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[01:17:08.840 --> 01:17:14.840]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.840 --> 01:17:20.840]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:17:20.840 --> 01:17:23.840]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons.
[01:17:23.840 --> 01:17:25.840]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:17:25.840 --> 01:17:28.840]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:17:28.840 --> 01:17:33.840]  How to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.840 --> 01:17:38.840]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.840 --> 01:17:40.840]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.840 --> 01:17:48.840]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com.
[01:17:48.840 --> 01:17:59.840]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:17:59.840 --> 01:18:04.840]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.840 --> 01:18:08.840]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:12.840]  I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:12.840 --> 01:18:19.840]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:19.840 --> 01:18:21.840]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:23.840]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:26.840]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:18:26.840 --> 01:18:30.840]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:30.840 --> 01:18:37.840]  Now, go to LogosradioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.840 --> 01:18:42.840]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:42.840 --> 01:18:43.840]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:43.840 --> 01:18:44.840]  No.
[01:18:44.840 --> 01:18:46.840]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:46.840 --> 01:18:47.840]  No.
[01:18:47.840 --> 01:18:48.840]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:48.840 --> 01:18:50.840]  No. I mean, yes.
[01:18:50.840 --> 01:18:55.840]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect.
[01:18:55.840 --> 01:18:56.840]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.840 --> 01:18:57.840]  We are welcome.
[01:18:57.840 --> 01:19:26.840]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:19:27.840 --> 01:19:41.840]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton.
[01:19:41.840 --> 01:19:46.840]  Randy Kelton didn't wait long enough for the bumper music to lower down.
[01:19:46.840 --> 01:19:50.840]  Okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:19:50.840 --> 01:19:53.840]  We have our radio here with Amanda Ridding.
[01:19:53.840 --> 01:20:01.840]  And you were talking about the behaviors of the higher powers of government.
[01:20:01.840 --> 01:20:10.840]  In Canada, what remedies do you have to restrict the higher powers of government?
[01:20:10.840 --> 01:20:15.840]  I know here in Texas, I wrote a 150-page complaint against the governor.
[01:20:15.840 --> 01:20:19.840]  It didn't get prosecuted, but it got his attention.
[01:20:19.840 --> 01:20:27.840]  What tools or remedies do you have in Canada for these higher-level members of government?
[01:20:27.840 --> 01:20:34.840]  Well, technically speaking, we can file private prosecution.
[01:20:34.840 --> 01:20:40.840]  And I can't, off the top of my head, remember what rule it falls under in the Criminal Code of Canada,
[01:20:40.840 --> 01:20:43.840]  but yes, you can pursue private prosecution.
[01:20:43.840 --> 01:20:50.840]  At issue is, because I did look into this at one point,
[01:20:50.840 --> 01:20:55.840]  it does appear that the Crown Attorney, because they've messed and perverted with our laws,
[01:20:55.840 --> 01:21:00.840]  can potentially jump in and block it.
[01:21:00.840 --> 01:21:03.840]  Because technically speaking, at the moment,
[01:21:03.840 --> 01:21:07.840]  private prosecution is supposed to be handed over to the Crown Attorney.
[01:21:07.840 --> 01:21:10.840]  We do have case law that technically supports us,
[01:21:10.840 --> 01:21:14.840]  but again, it's getting it through the courts.
[01:21:14.840 --> 01:21:25.840]  So again, the remedies that I've come up with are the remedies that I've found within our own Constitution
[01:21:25.840 --> 01:21:32.840]  and using the resources because the legislatures are considered a judicial proceeding
[01:21:32.840 --> 01:21:38.840]  under the Criminal Code of Canada, which is a constitutional statute uniform across the country.
[01:21:38.840 --> 01:21:45.840]  So starting at that judicial proceeding with the intent that I can go to the court proceedings is a possibility,
[01:21:45.840 --> 01:21:50.840]  not to mention, and I put it in my notices,
[01:21:50.840 --> 01:21:56.840]  that I could hold the person personally accountable and I could sue them.
[01:21:56.840 --> 01:22:00.840]  So there's also that lawsuit aspect of it.
[01:22:00.840 --> 01:22:07.840]  And I think what really needs to happen here is it's not a mere letter, it's not a mere petition.
[01:22:07.840 --> 01:22:11.840]  These are far more powerful.
[01:22:11.840 --> 01:22:22.840]  But one person may make a ripple, but tons of people, thousands of people, that will make a wave.
[01:22:22.840 --> 01:22:26.840]  And to really make an impact, you need a small army.
[01:22:26.840 --> 01:22:27.840]  You don't need the whole country.
[01:22:27.840 --> 01:22:33.840]  You just need that one, two percent.
[01:22:33.840 --> 01:22:40.840]  OK, the American Revolution was participated in by three percent of the population.
[01:22:40.840 --> 01:22:41.840]  Yeah.
[01:22:41.840 --> 01:22:52.840]  I am looking at Public Prosecution Service of Canada, 5.9 private prosecutions.
[01:22:52.840 --> 01:22:54.840]  What is that?
[01:22:54.840 --> 01:22:59.840]  Well, you found something I haven't found yet, mind you, again.
[01:22:59.840 --> 01:23:07.840]  I'm unsure if this is a statute because the page says Public Prosecution Service of Canada.
[01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:15.840]  And then it has private prosecutions 5.9, but it doesn't say 5.9 of what?
[01:23:15.840 --> 01:23:22.840]  Well, I know that the right to lay criminal charges privately falls under the criminal code.
[01:23:22.840 --> 01:23:27.840]  Maybe you can send me that link in the chat.
[01:23:27.840 --> 01:23:28.840]  OK, I will do that.
[01:23:28.840 --> 01:23:35.840]  You're saying the authority of the Attorney General of Canada to intervene in private prosecutions.
[01:23:35.840 --> 01:23:38.840]  This would probably take a while to read.
[01:23:38.840 --> 01:23:39.840]  OK, OK.
[01:23:39.840 --> 01:23:42.840]  So remember I told you the Crown can jump in any time?
[01:23:42.840 --> 01:23:43.840]  Yes.
[01:23:43.840 --> 01:23:44.840]  You just read the rule.
[01:23:44.840 --> 01:23:51.840]  They can jump in any time and kill it.
[01:23:51.840 --> 01:24:01.840]  So it looks like your remedies are pretty well under control by those you would exercise the remedy against.
[01:24:01.840 --> 01:24:12.840]  The authority of the Attorney General of Canada to intervene in private prosecutions, the DPP, what is that?
[01:24:12.840 --> 01:24:14.840]  Tell me on that one.
[01:24:14.840 --> 01:24:19.840]  It must be Department of Public Prosecutions.
[01:24:19.840 --> 01:24:29.840]  The DPP exercises the authority of the Attorney General of Canada respecting private prosecutions,
[01:24:29.840 --> 01:24:48.840]  including the authority to intervene and assume the conduct of or stay of such prosecutions by virtue of S33F of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act.
[01:24:48.840 --> 01:24:53.840]  OK, it sounds like they've pretty well gotten your hand down.
[01:24:53.840 --> 01:24:59.840]  Well, yeah.
[01:24:59.840 --> 01:25:12.840]  So there are things we can do, but doing the private citizens arrest and all that stuff, technically it's still in the books, but good luck pursuing.
[01:25:12.840 --> 01:25:16.840]  So who has a duty to pursue prosecutions?
[01:25:16.840 --> 01:25:25.840]  What I'm doing here in Texas is I'm filing criminal charges with judges, and all judges are magistrates.
[01:25:25.840 --> 01:25:36.840]  And the code says in 15.09, when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, I'm paraphrasing here, I've shortened it up a little,
[01:25:36.840 --> 01:25:38.840]  the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith.
[01:25:38.840 --> 01:25:41.840]  Well, none of them do.
[01:25:41.840 --> 01:25:42.840]  Did you still do it?
[01:25:42.840 --> 01:25:43.840]  Yeah.
[01:25:43.840 --> 01:25:50.840]  And so that's been part of the issue is officials have been just violating law, just ignore them.
[01:25:50.840 --> 01:25:53.840]  So I'm digging through the codes.
[01:25:53.840 --> 01:25:55.840]  How do we get at them?
[01:25:55.840 --> 01:26:12.840]  And the way I found here is since 15.09, unlike most states, it doesn't allow the judge to examine into the sufficiency of the complaint itself.
[01:26:12.840 --> 01:26:24.840]  New York, for instance, says that when a complaint is presented to a magistrate, the magistrate shall promptly investigate into the sufficiency of the allegation.
[01:26:24.840 --> 01:26:27.840]  Are we talking prima facie or beyond?
[01:26:27.840 --> 01:26:28.840]  Prima facie.
[01:26:28.840 --> 01:26:30.840]  Okay.
[01:26:30.840 --> 01:26:38.840]  On the face of it, it appears that a crime has been committed and that the named person has committed that crime.
[01:26:38.840 --> 01:26:43.840]  And if he finds prima facie evidence of a crime, then he's to issue a warrant.
[01:26:43.840 --> 01:26:55.840]  But in Texas, it says when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, complete in Accords 15.05 and 15.05 just addresses the requisites of a complaint,
[01:26:55.840 --> 01:27:00.840]  the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith.
[01:27:00.840 --> 01:27:02.840]  No discretion.
[01:27:02.840 --> 01:27:09.840]  And that's the key because a public official has immunity.
[01:27:09.840 --> 01:27:15.840]  Judges have, they think they have absolute immunity.
[01:27:15.840 --> 01:27:18.840]  Well, not exactly.
[01:27:18.840 --> 01:27:28.840]  They have absolute immunity for their discretionary acts when they render a ruling based on their discretion.
[01:27:28.840 --> 01:27:36.840]  But where they have a commandment to do something, that's not a discretionary act.
[01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:42.840]  That is an administrative act, one for which they do not have any immunity.
[01:27:42.840 --> 01:27:43.840]  Okay.
[01:27:43.840 --> 01:27:51.840]  So I go to this judge and I hand him some criminal complaints and I want him to issue some warrants against these guys that stole an airplane.
[01:27:51.840 --> 01:27:53.840]  He asked me if I was an attorney.
[01:27:53.840 --> 01:27:54.840]  Oh, no, no, no.
[01:27:54.840 --> 01:27:55.840]  I sleep well at night.
[01:27:55.840 --> 01:27:59.840]  I keep my hands in my own pockets. Thank you very much.
[01:27:59.840 --> 01:28:01.840]  He said, well, did you talk to an attorney?
[01:28:01.840 --> 01:28:03.840]  No, I don't waste my time with those shysters.
[01:28:03.840 --> 01:28:05.840]  They don't know squat.
[01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:08.840]  Well, if you're not an attorney, I'm not even going to read this.
[01:28:08.840 --> 01:28:11.840]  He threw him down on the counter and stormed out.
[01:28:11.840 --> 01:28:13.840]  I have this rule.
[01:28:13.840 --> 01:28:19.840]  Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do
[01:28:19.840 --> 01:28:26.840]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not compel them to do.
[01:28:26.840 --> 01:28:32.840]  The law in this case compelled him to issue warrants.
[01:28:32.840 --> 01:28:41.840]  Once the person was arrested, arrest warrants in Texas always say, or in the United States as a whole,
[01:28:41.840 --> 01:28:47.840]  arrest this person and bring him before me.
[01:28:47.840 --> 01:28:52.840]  The only time a warrant would be issued is when the person wasn't there.
[01:28:52.840 --> 01:28:54.840]  So it's an ex parte hearing.
[01:28:54.840 --> 01:28:57.840]  So you only hear the side of the accuser.
[01:28:57.840 --> 01:28:59.840]  So you arrest that person, bring him back in front of me.
[01:28:59.840 --> 01:29:02.840]  Now we have a proper examining trial.
[01:29:02.840 --> 01:29:04.840]  We hear both sides.
[01:29:04.840 --> 01:29:10.840]  So I give the judge the magistrate to complaint.
[01:29:10.840 --> 01:29:11.840]  He refuses to hear it.
[01:29:11.840 --> 01:29:14.840]  I take out my cell phone down 911.
[01:29:14.840 --> 01:29:18.840]  I need an officer down here to arrest the judge.
[01:29:18.840 --> 01:29:19.840]  The officer shows up.
[01:29:19.840 --> 01:29:21.840]  Why would I arrest a judge?
[01:29:21.840 --> 01:29:29.840]  Class A Mr. Mayor, official oppression, criminal violation 39.03 Texas Penal Code.
[01:29:29.840 --> 01:29:32.840]  Would that be an obstruction of justice code?
[01:29:32.840 --> 01:29:36.840]  No, there's another one for obstruction of justice.
[01:29:36.840 --> 01:29:38.840]  I'll explain that when we come back.
[01:29:38.840 --> 01:29:43.840]  I'm saying this because we adopted English law 200 years ago.
[01:29:43.840 --> 01:29:45.840]  You're going to have similar stuff.
[01:29:45.840 --> 01:29:46.840]  Hang on.
[01:29:46.840 --> 01:30:01.840]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:01.840 --> 01:30:04.840]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[01:30:04.840 --> 01:30:08.840]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come,
[01:30:08.840 --> 01:30:11.840]  and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[01:30:11.840 --> 01:30:15.840]  See Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:15.840 --> 01:30:17.840]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.840 --> 01:30:21.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.840 --> 01:30:26.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.840 --> 01:30:27.840]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:27.840 --> 01:30:31.840]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.840 --> 01:30:33.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.840 --> 01:30:37.840]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:37.840 --> 01:30:41.840]  a private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.840 --> 01:30:45.840]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:45.840 --> 01:30:49.840]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power
[01:30:49.840 --> 01:30:52.840]  going into your home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.840 --> 01:30:56.840]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor
[01:30:56.840 --> 01:30:59.840]  electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.840 --> 01:31:03.840]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast.
[01:31:03.840 --> 01:31:06.840]  If we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[01:31:06.840 --> 01:31:08.840]  hackers will have a field day.
[01:31:08.840 --> 01:31:12.840]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[01:31:12.840 --> 01:31:14.840]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
[01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:18.840]  I'd long oppose smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:18.840 --> 01:31:21.840]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[01:31:21.840 --> 01:31:23.840]  There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.840 --> 01:31:26.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com,
[01:31:26.840 --> 01:31:31.840]  the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.840 --> 01:31:35.840]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon
[01:31:35.840 --> 01:31:36.840]  of September 11th.
[01:31:36.840 --> 01:31:38.840]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.840 --> 01:31:43.840]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.840 --> 01:31:46.840]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.840 --> 01:31:48.840]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:48.840 --> 01:31:50.840]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.840 --> 01:31:51.840]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.840 --> 01:31:52.840]  I'm a New York City correction office.
[01:31:52.840 --> 01:31:53.840]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.840 --> 01:31:55.840]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.840 --> 01:31:57.840]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.840 --> 01:32:02.840]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.840 --> 01:32:05.840]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:05.840 --> 01:32:07.840]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:07.840 --> 01:32:10.840]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.840 --> 01:32:13.840]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.840 --> 01:32:15.840]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:15.840 --> 01:32:17.840]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.840 --> 01:32:20.840]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.840 --> 01:32:22.840]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:22.840 --> 01:32:25.840]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.840 --> 01:32:28.840]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.840 --> 01:32:31.840]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.840 --> 01:32:33.840]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:33.840 --> 01:32:35.840]  and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.840 --> 01:32:37.840]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.840 --> 01:32:40.840]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.840 --> 01:32:42.840]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:42.840 --> 01:32:45.840]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:45.840 --> 01:32:47.840]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:47.840 --> 01:32:50.840]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.840 --> 01:32:54.840]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.840 --> 01:33:02.840]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:02.840 --> 01:33:12.840]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.840 --> 01:33:26.840]  I see a tool, I see a tool Every time I look into it, I see tools of ingenuity
[01:33:26.840 --> 01:33:32.840]  Used against the workers of iniquity Tools of master capability
[01:33:32.840 --> 01:33:38.840]  Available for all eternity They come from natural divinity
[01:33:38.840 --> 01:33:42.840]  We are set by roots and authenticity
[01:33:42.840 --> 01:33:44.840]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:44.840 --> 01:33:50.840]  Randy Kelton, Brett Kalten, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday,
[01:33:50.840 --> 01:33:56.840]  the 10th day of February, 2023.
[01:33:56.840 --> 01:33:58.840]  Is it 23 already?
[01:33:58.840 --> 01:33:59.840]  Yeah.
[01:33:59.840 --> 01:34:01.840]  Oh my goodness.
[01:34:01.840 --> 01:34:04.840]  Time flies when you're having fun.
[01:34:04.840 --> 01:34:07.840]  Okay, we were talking about the fun part.
[01:34:07.840 --> 01:34:14.840]  If you look at the law in the United States and in Texas,
[01:34:14.840 --> 01:34:18.840]  it looks like they have everything under control.
[01:34:18.840 --> 01:34:28.840]  And there are some misunderstandings that Brett and I spend a lot of time trying to get people to get past.
[01:34:28.840 --> 01:34:35.840]  If you mention a criminal complaint, everybody thinks the police or the prosecutors.
[01:34:35.840 --> 01:34:43.840]  Well, there is nothing in US law and any state I've ever been to
[01:34:43.840 --> 01:34:48.840]  that directs a criminal complaint to a peace officer.
[01:34:48.840 --> 01:34:50.840]  Nothing.
[01:34:50.840 --> 01:34:57.840]  Now, they investigate crime, but they don't prosecute crime.
[01:34:57.840 --> 01:35:05.840]  They just figure out when crime has occurred and they give notice of crime to a magistrate.
[01:35:05.840 --> 01:35:08.840]  That's what magistrates are there for.
[01:35:08.840 --> 01:35:13.840]  But a policeman has no special power to give notice of crime.
[01:35:13.840 --> 01:35:19.840]  The public has the same power and actually have the duty.
[01:35:19.840 --> 01:35:24.840]  So when you start making criminal accusations, you're a protected class.
[01:35:24.840 --> 01:35:27.840]  You're protected the same way a judge is.
[01:35:27.840 --> 01:35:34.840]  As long as you don't commit perjury, I can say that this guy was walking down the street
[01:35:34.840 --> 01:35:42.840]  and he threw a piece of paper on the street, he ought to be thrown in jail for something outrageous.
[01:35:42.840 --> 01:35:48.840]  If I state the facts as true, I can come to any conclusion I want to.
[01:35:48.840 --> 01:35:51.840]  And I am absolutely protected.
[01:35:51.840 --> 01:35:56.840]  So when I make criminal complaints, I am a protected class.
[01:35:56.840 --> 01:36:03.840]  So when you make criminal complaints, they are to be made to some magistrate.
[01:36:03.840 --> 01:36:07.840]  Now, I think it's a little bit different in Canada because...
[01:36:07.840 --> 01:36:09.840]  No, it's a justice...
[01:36:09.840 --> 01:36:11.840]  I do know it has to be done on a form.
[01:36:11.840 --> 01:36:14.840]  It has to be taken to a justice of the peace at the minimum.
[01:36:14.840 --> 01:36:15.840]  Yeah, okay.
[01:36:15.840 --> 01:36:19.840]  There is language, the titles.
[01:36:19.840 --> 01:36:24.840]  In the United States, we have judges and we have magistrates.
[01:36:24.840 --> 01:36:29.840]  Now, the federal courts have what they call a magistrate judge, but that's something else.
[01:36:29.840 --> 01:36:33.840]  Every judge is a magistrate.
[01:36:33.840 --> 01:36:40.840]  When the judge sits for the purpose of hearing a criminal or civil case,
[01:36:40.840 --> 01:36:46.840]  he sits in his constitutional capacity as a judge.
[01:36:46.840 --> 01:36:51.840]  But when a criminal affidavit is presented to a judge,
[01:36:51.840 --> 01:36:56.840]  the judge takes off his judge's hat and puts on his magistrate's hat.
[01:36:56.840 --> 01:37:01.840]  And with his magistrate's hat on, the only thing he can do is he can marry people.
[01:37:01.840 --> 01:37:04.840]  That's so he can make a few extra bucks.
[01:37:04.840 --> 01:37:13.840]  He can hear criminal complaints, hold examining trials and set bail, and that's it.
[01:37:13.840 --> 01:37:20.840]  Every judge in Texas is a magistrate and every judge in every state is a magistrate.
[01:37:20.840 --> 01:37:24.840]  The same in Canada, but we use justice.
[01:37:24.840 --> 01:37:29.840]  Including the Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[01:37:29.840 --> 01:37:34.840]  I filed a 150-page criminal complaint against the governor,
[01:37:34.840 --> 01:37:42.840]  and I mailed it to the Chief Justice of the Supreme and demanded that he issue 35 warrants.
[01:37:42.840 --> 01:37:50.840]  For sedition, for depraved heart murder, depraved heart assault, oh, stack up.
[01:37:50.840 --> 01:37:55.840]  He did not issue warrants.
[01:37:55.840 --> 01:38:04.840]  Now, 15.09 says that when a complaint complete in accordance with 1505 is forwarded to a magistrate,
[01:38:04.840 --> 01:38:07.840]  the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith.
[01:38:07.840 --> 01:38:12.840]  Now, of all people who should understand what that means,
[01:38:12.840 --> 01:38:16.840]  the Chief Justice of the Supreme should understand what that means.
[01:38:16.840 --> 01:38:21.840]  And I can do that because this is a republic.
[01:38:21.840 --> 01:38:24.840]  I'm the master, they're the servants.
[01:38:24.840 --> 01:38:27.840]  Everybody works for me.
[01:38:27.840 --> 01:38:29.840]  So I don't go to the bottom, I go to the top.
[01:38:29.840 --> 01:38:31.840]  That guy works for me.
[01:38:31.840 --> 01:38:37.840]  If somebody at the bottom needs to be handled, then my guys who work for me handle those guys.
[01:38:37.840 --> 01:38:39.840]  So I file with him.
[01:38:39.840 --> 01:38:42.840]  I'm going to sue him personally.
[01:38:42.840 --> 01:38:44.840]  Well, he'll get it thrown out.
[01:38:44.840 --> 01:38:47.840]  I won't win that one, maybe.
[01:38:47.840 --> 01:38:56.840]  But it will certainly embarrass him when he has to hire an attorney to write his answer to my lawsuit.
[01:38:56.840 --> 01:39:03.840]  Because if I find out that he used a government attorney, like the attorney general,
[01:39:03.840 --> 01:39:07.840]  the attorney general is generally the lawyer for the state,
[01:39:07.840 --> 01:39:11.840]  then I'll accuse him of misappropriation of public funds.
[01:39:11.840 --> 01:39:16.840]  It's not what you can prove that keeps you in the court.
[01:39:16.840 --> 01:39:21.840]  It is the nature of your claim.
[01:39:21.840 --> 01:39:27.840]  When they look at your case to see if it is a viable case,
[01:39:27.840 --> 01:39:34.840]  they must accept all of your facts as true, not prima facie, for this purpose.
[01:39:34.840 --> 01:39:42.840]  If all of your facts as stated were true, would you have a claim against the defendant?
[01:39:42.840 --> 01:39:54.840]  So I'm claiming that I presented a complaint complete in accordance with 1505 to the Chief Justice of the Supreme in his capacity as a magistrate.
[01:39:54.840 --> 01:39:57.840]  And he did not issue a warrant for a threat.
[01:39:57.840 --> 01:40:00.840]  If that is true, I have a claim.
[01:40:00.840 --> 01:40:07.840]  I have a claim against him for failing to perform an administrative duty.
[01:40:07.840 --> 01:40:18.840]  He has to get a lawyer to file a response and argue that this doesn't fall under an administrative act.
[01:40:18.840 --> 01:40:21.840]  Good luck with that.
[01:40:21.840 --> 01:40:29.840]  And if they rule that it doesn't fall under an administrative act, then the government lawyer can represent it.
[01:40:29.840 --> 01:40:36.840]  But if he uses a government lawyer upfront, then I get to charge him criminally.
[01:40:36.840 --> 01:40:44.840]  So you set your official up so that you can sting him good.
[01:40:44.840 --> 01:40:46.840]  No, I get it.
[01:40:46.840 --> 01:40:54.840]  I'm working with a friend of mine right now, and it's not 100% related,
[01:40:54.840 --> 01:41:01.840]  but she's taking the Ontario Labor Relations Board to the Divisional Court in June.
[01:41:01.840 --> 01:41:06.840]  When we filed the factum, during the research of the factum,
[01:41:06.840 --> 01:41:13.840]  we discovered that the Ontario Labor Relations Board is not only in the wrong government, it's completely in the wrong ministry.
[01:41:13.840 --> 01:41:17.840]  In the factum, we established constitutionally how it's in the wrong ministry,
[01:41:17.840 --> 01:41:21.840]  that it's constitutionally repugnant because it's in the wrong ministry,
[01:41:21.840 --> 01:41:29.840]  and that while the Attorney General of Ontario should superintend this matter because it's not in the right ministry even,
[01:41:29.840 --> 01:41:36.840]  the reality is the Attorney General can't superintend the matter.
[01:41:36.840 --> 01:41:44.840]  Three weeks after we filed the factum, the Attorney General sent a notice to all parties because he is supposed to be a part of it, right?
[01:41:44.840 --> 01:41:45.840]  Yes.
[01:41:45.840 --> 01:41:52.840]  He sent a notice to all parties, we will not intervene in this matter, and please, to all parties, do not send us any more information.
[01:41:52.840 --> 01:41:56.840]  That's a double acknowledgment. We were right.
[01:41:56.840 --> 01:42:01.840]  So, how did you go after the individuals?
[01:42:01.840 --> 01:42:04.840]  So, well, we haven't.
[01:42:04.840 --> 01:42:10.840]  We were waiting for the respondents to respond to the factum.
[01:42:10.840 --> 01:42:13.840]  They're now in default.
[01:42:13.840 --> 01:42:17.840]  How does default work in Canada?
[01:42:17.840 --> 01:42:28.840]  I know here in the United States, if I file suit and the defendant does not answer by the Monday after the 21st day,
[01:42:28.840 --> 01:42:34.840]  I go to the clerk, I hand the clerk the court-stamped filing.
[01:42:34.840 --> 01:42:38.840]  The clerk will look at the court-stamped filing and then look in the record.
[01:42:38.840 --> 01:42:43.840]  If she doesn't see an answer in the record and she looks at the calendar,
[01:42:43.840 --> 01:42:48.840]  and it's past the day they were supposed to file, she signs the default.
[01:42:48.840 --> 01:42:56.840]  Yeah, I know that works that way for small claims court, but I've never, I haven't looked to see if the rules apply to the divisional court.
[01:42:56.840 --> 01:43:05.840]  So, we have to look, but I was going to potentially have a bit of fun with it first and maybe do some interrogatories to paint them into a corner.
[01:43:05.840 --> 01:43:14.840]  What we're finding is you can go down there and express all the laws and, you know, jump up and down rail and license indignation.
[01:43:14.840 --> 01:43:16.840]  Nobody cares.
[01:43:16.840 --> 01:43:22.840]  But when you sue them in their personal capacity, if you sue them in their official capacity, they don't care.
[01:43:22.840 --> 01:43:27.840]  The tax dollars, they'll use tax money to defend themselves with.
[01:43:27.840 --> 01:43:32.840]  We can set them up like you've got ministers here.
[01:43:32.840 --> 01:43:39.840]  Acting in an official capacity they don't have, we should be able to go after them individually.
[01:43:39.840 --> 01:43:43.840]  We should, which is one of the reasons why I've been putting these notice clauses in,
[01:43:43.840 --> 01:43:48.840]  that they will be held personally accountable from this day forward if they continue to act in bad faith.
[01:43:48.840 --> 01:43:50.840]  And we have the case law.
[01:43:50.840 --> 01:43:55.840]  Hold on, we have to go to our sponsors, Rhianna Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio.
[01:43:55.840 --> 01:43:59.840]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.840 --> 01:44:05.840]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:05.840 --> 01:44:10.840]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:10.840 --> 01:44:16.840]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.840 --> 01:44:24.840]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:24.840 --> 01:44:30.840]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:30.840 --> 01:44:38.840]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:38.840 --> 01:44:46.840]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:46.840 --> 01:44:50.840]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:50.840 --> 01:44:57.840]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:57.840 --> 01:45:01.840]  Order now.
[01:45:01.840 --> 01:45:05.840]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:05.840 --> 01:45:16.840]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.840 --> 01:45:20.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.840 --> 01:45:24.840]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.840 --> 01:45:29.840]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.840 --> 01:45:35.840]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.840 --> 01:45:44.840]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.840 --> 01:45:53.840]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.840 --> 01:46:15.840]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.840 --> 01:46:50.840]  The people come down from the hill
[01:46:50.840 --> 01:46:58.840]  Into the city they will shuffle
[01:46:58.840 --> 01:47:06.840]  Many long nights, many strong frills
[01:47:06.840 --> 01:47:13.840]  Land of comfort, land of scuffle
[01:47:13.840 --> 01:47:22.840]  It's hard to lose, and it's hard to hold
[01:47:22.840 --> 01:47:28.840]  Far back as they remember, they've been told
[01:47:28.840 --> 01:47:37.840]  They got to learn sign language, sign language
[01:47:37.840 --> 01:47:46.840]  Sign language, sign language
[01:47:46.840 --> 01:48:05.840]  Sign language
[01:48:05.840 --> 01:48:13.840]  There have been some who speak sentences
[01:48:13.840 --> 01:48:20.840]  Then there are others who break the rules
[01:48:20.840 --> 01:48:28.840]  There have been some who speak sentences
[01:48:28.840 --> 01:48:35.840]  Then there are others who speak the tools
[01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:03.840]  I'm not supposed to start talking right away, but I forgive myself.
[01:49:03.840 --> 01:49:06.840]  Besides, you're talking about my favorite subject.
[01:49:06.840 --> 01:49:11.840]  Taking public officials on, and it's been my experience.
[01:49:11.840 --> 01:49:16.840]  Going to the ones at the top is not the best strategy.
[01:49:16.840 --> 01:49:20.840]  Going to the ones at the bottom, this is where we're going to change things.
[01:49:20.840 --> 01:49:27.840]  We got the guys at the bottom who were following directions from the guys at the top.
[01:49:27.840 --> 01:49:33.840]  And we come after them for what they're doing, what they've been told to do,
[01:49:33.840 --> 01:49:38.840]  and what they've been taught and trained to do, and then we sue them personally.
[01:49:38.840 --> 01:49:42.840]  And then they go find the law and try to figure out a way to defend themselves,
[01:49:42.840 --> 01:49:46.840]  and they find it's not there.
[01:49:46.840 --> 01:49:51.840]  Then they go to the guys up above and say, guys, you got to fix this.
[01:49:51.840 --> 01:49:53.840]  You're getting us in trouble.
[01:49:53.840 --> 01:50:00.840]  So if we go after the big guys, they will really mount all their defenses.
[01:50:00.840 --> 01:50:04.840]  But if we build tools to go after the little guys all around,
[01:50:04.840 --> 01:50:06.840]  we can get a bunch of people to do that,
[01:50:06.840 --> 01:50:12.840]  especially if we can develop a strategy where they will write you a check.
[01:50:12.840 --> 01:50:16.840]  Well, with my action, and I'm just going to play on that if you don't want,
[01:50:16.840 --> 01:50:24.840]  with my action that I'm taking to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario,
[01:50:24.840 --> 01:50:27.840]  I've sent it to my member of provincial parliament.
[01:50:27.840 --> 01:50:32.840]  I'm putting the onus on her, the elected official, for my ratting.
[01:50:32.840 --> 01:50:36.840]  She's the one I'm going to target. She's the one I'm going to go after.
[01:50:36.840 --> 01:50:42.840]  She's a nobody. She's a backbencher. Who gives a care about her? Nobody.
[01:50:42.840 --> 01:50:48.840]  Yeah, but when you sue the backbencher and everybody else looks around
[01:50:48.840 --> 01:50:56.840]  and she just got sued for doing what we're all doing, that scares everybody.
[01:50:56.840 --> 01:50:59.840]  You know, here we have grand jurors.
[01:50:59.840 --> 01:51:03.840]  And I have never got anyone indicted by a grand jury.
[01:51:03.840 --> 01:51:08.840]  But I have certainly got law changed.
[01:51:08.840 --> 01:51:14.840]  I think I spoke to you when we were talking the other day
[01:51:14.840 --> 01:51:17.840]  about getting all the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals
[01:51:17.840 --> 01:51:19.840]  put in front of a grand jury.
[01:51:19.840 --> 01:51:20.840]  Yes.
[01:51:20.840 --> 01:51:24.840]  That taught me a lesson.
[01:51:24.840 --> 01:51:31.840]  I didn't get them indicted, but they had to look at the prospect of getting indicted.
[01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:37.840]  It terrified them. They changed their behavior.
[01:51:37.840 --> 01:51:43.840]  Just mentioning grand juries tenses up everybody.
[01:51:43.840 --> 01:51:51.840]  Because, you know, these public officials, they figure a grand jury's not going to indict me.
[01:51:51.840 --> 01:51:56.840]  Well, maybe. We had a judge, Scalia, a Supreme Court justice,
[01:51:56.840 --> 01:52:04.840]  who said in Montgomery v. State that any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich indicted.
[01:52:04.840 --> 01:52:06.840]  And that's true.
[01:52:06.840 --> 01:52:12.840]  The problem is keeping the ham sandwich from getting indicted.
[01:52:12.840 --> 01:52:17.840]  And when we start making grand jury noises, it scares everybody.
[01:52:17.840 --> 01:52:22.840]  I walked into my district attorney's office one day, and this guy was,
[01:52:22.840 --> 01:52:26.840]  he was a good prosecutor, at least from my perspective.
[01:52:26.840 --> 01:52:32.840]  We were pretty good friends for a long time, or at least we had a mutual respect.
[01:52:32.840 --> 01:52:37.840]  And Greg's sitting there with his head in his hand, and I said, what's the matter, Greg?
[01:52:37.840 --> 01:52:41.840]  And he looked up at me with this full-on look, and he said,
[01:52:41.840 --> 01:52:49.840]  those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[01:52:49.840 --> 01:52:55.840]  I looked up at the ceiling, held up both hands, and said, there is a God.
[01:52:55.840 --> 01:52:56.840]  Right?
[01:52:56.840 --> 01:52:59.840]  I could not have heard anything better.
[01:52:59.840 --> 01:53:06.840]  I was in Austin, and when a grand jury votes,
[01:53:06.840 --> 01:53:15.840]  then they come before the court and read the fact of the indictment into the record
[01:53:15.840 --> 01:53:18.840]  with a quorum of the grand jury present.
[01:53:18.840 --> 01:53:21.840]  And then the clerk shall make notes in the minutes of the court.
[01:53:21.840 --> 01:53:23.840]  So I went down to Austin.
[01:53:23.840 --> 01:53:27.840]  I want to see the minutes of the court from the grand jury.
[01:53:27.840 --> 01:53:30.840]  Two friends of mine went down there, and they told them they didn't have any.
[01:53:30.840 --> 01:53:35.840]  And I went down there, and they remembered me, so they went and got them.
[01:53:35.840 --> 01:53:42.840]  And every single grand jury meeting, there were at least two nobiles.
[01:53:42.840 --> 01:53:46.840]  So everybody's saying, oh, anybody who gets sent by the grand jury,
[01:53:46.840 --> 01:53:50.840]  the prosecutor absolutely controls the grand jury.
[01:53:50.840 --> 01:53:53.840]  No, he does not.
[01:53:53.840 --> 01:53:57.840]  Just like my prosecutor said, those darn grand jurors,
[01:53:57.840 --> 01:53:59.840]  you never know what they're going to do.
[01:53:59.840 --> 01:54:03.840]  So if I put you in front of a grand jury,
[01:54:03.840 --> 01:54:07.840]  it's like playing Russian roulette with your career.
[01:54:07.840 --> 01:54:08.840]  Yeah.
[01:54:08.840 --> 01:54:09.840]  That's the power.
[01:54:09.840 --> 01:54:13.840]  I don't care if I get them in front of the grand jury or not.
[01:54:13.840 --> 01:54:15.840]  I just want to make grand jury noises.
[01:54:15.840 --> 01:54:19.840]  Jump up and down, rail in righteous indignation,
[01:54:19.840 --> 01:54:21.840]  because they're not putting them in front of the grand jury,
[01:54:21.840 --> 01:54:25.840]  and the prosecutor's doing everything he can to fin me off.
[01:54:25.840 --> 01:54:33.840]  And this judge back there is wondering if I'm going to get him indicted.
[01:54:33.840 --> 01:54:36.840]  This is how we get things fixed.
[01:54:36.840 --> 01:54:37.840]  It's where the real power is.
[01:54:37.840 --> 01:54:38.840]  It's all political.
[01:54:38.840 --> 01:54:39.840]  It's always political.
[01:54:39.840 --> 01:54:42.840]  And it sounds like you've got a bunch of ministers.
[01:54:42.840 --> 01:54:44.840]  Yeah.
[01:54:44.840 --> 01:54:48.840]  So our ministers are the equivalent of your Congress.
[01:54:48.840 --> 01:54:51.840]  So they're in the wrong—that's outrageous.
[01:54:51.840 --> 01:54:58.840]  How do they get in the wrong house?
[01:54:58.840 --> 01:55:01.840]  So good question.
[01:55:01.840 --> 01:55:07.840]  So because we have—so our provinces, some provinces have a Senate.
[01:55:07.840 --> 01:55:09.840]  Most don't.
[01:55:09.840 --> 01:55:13.840]  So you have the House of the People and the lieutenant governor.
[01:55:13.840 --> 01:55:16.840]  And then in the Parliament of Canada, you have the House of the People,
[01:55:16.840 --> 01:55:18.840]  known as the House of Commons.
[01:55:18.840 --> 01:55:21.840]  And you have the Senate, which is appointed.
[01:55:21.840 --> 01:55:24.840]  But it's appointed by the prime minister.
[01:55:24.840 --> 01:55:28.840]  It's supposed to be appointed by the monarch.
[01:55:28.840 --> 01:55:35.840]  And you have the governor general, who acts on behalf and in the name of the monarch.
[01:55:35.840 --> 01:55:39.840]  So it's—yeah, it's interesting.
[01:55:39.840 --> 01:55:42.840]  And they have seriously perverted the laws.
[01:55:42.840 --> 01:55:47.840]  And like I said, anything and everything I can think of, I'm hitting them with.
[01:55:47.840 --> 01:55:54.840]  The first time you sting them good, you will get their attention.
[01:55:54.840 --> 01:55:57.840]  Then you can begin to have an effect.
[01:55:57.840 --> 01:55:58.840]  Yeah.
[01:55:58.840 --> 01:56:06.840]  The most effect I ever had—it wasn't filing criminal charges against the governor.
[01:56:06.840 --> 01:56:07.840]  Well, maybe. I don't know.
[01:56:07.840 --> 01:56:11.840]  But I went into a court one day, and I was just screwing around.
[01:56:11.840 --> 01:56:13.840]  I didn't like this judge. He's a real jerk.
[01:56:13.840 --> 01:56:17.840]  And most of the people have heard my hearing aid story.
[01:56:17.840 --> 01:56:20.840]  I walked up to the bar while he's hearing a case in front of me,
[01:56:20.840 --> 01:56:23.840]  and the judge looked up, and he said, can I help you?
[01:56:23.840 --> 01:56:27.840]  I said, yes, Your Honor, my name's Randy Kelton, and I have a hearing deficiency.
[01:56:27.840 --> 01:56:30.840]  Well, Mr. Kelton, what's wrong with your hearing?
[01:56:30.840 --> 01:56:32.840]  Oh, Judge, I was down in Mexico the other day,
[01:56:32.840 --> 01:56:36.840]  and I drank too much of that cheap tequila and lost my hearing aid.
[01:56:36.840 --> 01:56:37.840]  Why are you telling me this?
[01:56:37.840 --> 01:56:39.840]  I said, do you have accommodations hearing impaired?
[01:56:39.840 --> 01:56:42.840]  No, I do not. You have a sound system.
[01:56:42.840 --> 01:56:43.840]  Here, will you turn it up?
[01:56:43.840 --> 01:56:45.840]  No, I will not.
[01:56:45.840 --> 01:56:47.840]  Well, then will you speak up? And he did.
[01:56:47.840 --> 01:56:49.840]  I told the bailiff I didn't sit down and shut up.
[01:56:49.840 --> 01:56:51.840]  He said, throw me out of the courtroom.
[01:56:51.840 --> 01:56:54.840]  Well, when I got out of the court, I told him—when I left the courtroom,
[01:56:54.840 --> 01:56:57.840]  I told the bailiff, you come with me.
[01:56:57.840 --> 01:57:03.840]  We went out in the hall, and I asked the bailiff to arrest the judge for official oppression
[01:57:03.840 --> 01:57:06.840]  because he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform,
[01:57:06.840 --> 01:57:10.840]  which was a federal duty, not a state.
[01:57:10.840 --> 01:57:12.840]  Americans with Disabilities Act.
[01:57:12.840 --> 01:57:17.840]  And when he asked me, why didn't you tell me about the Americans with Disabilities Act?
[01:57:17.840 --> 01:57:22.840]  Heck, if I'd have done that, he might have turned the sound up.
[01:57:22.840 --> 01:57:29.840]  The bailiff stood there and realized I set him up.
[01:57:29.840 --> 01:57:34.840]  It hadn't occurred to him that you can do that to a judge.
[01:57:34.840 --> 01:57:38.840]  You are the master of the servant.
[01:57:38.840 --> 01:57:40.840]  Yeah.
[01:57:40.840 --> 01:57:49.840]  So here you've got a whole house that you can go after each one of them individually, personally.
[01:57:49.840 --> 01:57:54.840]  Well, I might be picking your brain, guys, down the road.
[01:57:54.840 --> 01:58:00.840]  We will be here, and we are out of time.
[01:58:00.840 --> 01:58:02.840]  We were just getting to the fun part.
[01:58:02.840 --> 01:58:05.840]  Oh, I got to tell you, though, I am tired.
[01:58:05.840 --> 01:58:09.840]  It's 1 a.m.
[01:58:09.840 --> 01:58:12.840]  Okay, if you want to come back, let us know.
[01:58:12.840 --> 01:58:14.840]  We'll be glad to have you back on.
[01:58:14.840 --> 01:58:16.840]  I want to learn more about Canada.
[01:58:16.840 --> 01:58:19.840]  Okay, thank you for being with us.
[01:58:19.840 --> 01:58:23.840]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:23.840 --> 01:58:31.840]  And we're getting right down to the last, so now I'm going to ask Brett to say something insightful
[01:58:31.840 --> 01:58:34.840]  and intuitive.
[01:58:34.840 --> 01:58:36.840]  Come on, Brett.
[01:58:36.840 --> 01:58:38.840]  Why, thank you.
[01:58:38.840 --> 01:58:41.840]  It's not like you're going to throw me off the cliff or anything like that.
[01:58:41.840 --> 01:58:43.840]  No, no.
[01:58:43.840 --> 01:58:49.840]  But it was great having Amanda Redding with us, and we'll see you next week.
[01:58:49.840 --> 01:58:57.840]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.840 --> 01:59:02.840]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says,
[01:59:02.840 --> 01:59:07.840]  verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.840 --> 01:59:10.840]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.840 --> 01:59:19.840]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.840 --> 01:59:25.840]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.840 --> 01:59:29.840]  plus charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.840 --> 01:59:32.840]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.840 --> 01:59:40.840]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.840 --> 01:59:50.840]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.840 --> 01:59:52.840]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.840 --> 01:59:56.840]  You found it. logosradionetwork.com.