ROL_2023-02-10_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.000 --> 00:09.000] They guarantee you the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.000 --> 00:10.000] Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.000 --> 00:16.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[00:16.000 --> 00:18.000] Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.000 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.000 --> 00:41.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:41.000 --> 00:45.000] Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.000 --> 00:47.000] Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.000 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 01:03.000] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.000] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.000 --> 01:10.000] But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.000 --> 01:14.000] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.000 --> 01:21.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:35.000 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.000 --> 01:40.000] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:40.000 --> 01:46.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.000 --> 01:56.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.000 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights.
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.000 --> 02:04.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:11.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.000 --> 02:15.000] Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.000 --> 02:22.000] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights and a big old bear hug.
[02:22.000 --> 02:30.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.000 --> 02:31.000] Get it?
[02:31.000 --> 02:33.000] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.000 --> 02:38.000] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said,
[02:38.000 --> 02:45.000] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny,
[02:45.000 --> 02:50.000] which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.000 --> 03:09.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:20.000 --> 03:27.000] Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do?
[03:27.000 --> 03:32.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.000 --> 03:38.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000] When you were eight and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and learn the golden rule.
[03:43.000 --> 03:46.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:46.000 --> 03:57.000] It gives you a crack and you must get cool!
[03:57.000 --> 04:01.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000] You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one!
[04:05.000 --> 04:07.000] You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father!
[04:07.000 --> 04:10.000] You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister!
[04:10.000 --> 04:12.000] You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me!
[04:12.000 --> 04:15.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
[04:15.000 --> 04:16.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:16.000 --> 04:17.000] Bad boys, bad boys Whatcha gonna do?
[04:17.000 --> 04:18.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:18.000 --> 04:19.000] Bad boys, bad boys Whatcha gonna do?
[04:19.000 --> 04:20.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:20.000 --> 04:21.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:21.000 --> 04:22.000] Bad boys, bad boys Whatcha gonna do?
[04:22.000 --> 04:23.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:23.000 --> 04:24.000] Bad boys, bad boys Whatcha gonna do?
[04:24.000 --> 04:25.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:25.000 --> 04:26.000] Bad boys, bad boys Whatcha gonna do?
[04:26.000 --> 04:27.000] Whatcha gonna do?
[04:27.000 --> 04:40.760] Nobody now give you no break nuts Garrett
[04:40.760 --> 04:44.900] 27
[04:44.900 --> 05:09.380] Okay, howdy, howdy, Bandi Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 10th
[05:09.380 --> 05:13.900] day of February, 2023.
[05:13.900 --> 05:19.020] Did I get that right, Brett?
[05:19.020 --> 05:20.660] Would you believe April?
[05:20.660 --> 05:21.660] No.
[05:21.660 --> 05:26.620] I thought you wouldn't go for her, you'd hear this, but they would probably.
[05:26.620 --> 05:27.620] Okay.
[05:27.620 --> 05:28.620] Okay.
[05:28.620 --> 05:30.780] We have a guest who will be coming on in the next segment.
[05:30.780 --> 05:37.740] The producer's got her up, getting in my chicken stuff, and we'll have her on in one more segment.
[05:37.740 --> 05:39.740] She's Amanda Redding.
[05:39.740 --> 05:47.140] I have to warn everybody, she is a Canuck, so you know how they are.
[05:47.140 --> 05:49.940] If there are any of you Canucks out there, don't take that personal.
[05:49.940 --> 05:53.540] Go ahead and take it personal.
[05:53.540 --> 05:55.020] We like to pick on them.
[05:55.020 --> 05:56.020] Okay.
[05:56.020 --> 06:04.700] She's going to talk about something interesting about how Canada is different from the U.S.
[06:04.700 --> 06:13.660] She's addressing an issue where they passed some resolution through their legislature
[06:13.660 --> 06:21.220] that effectively eliminated the Canadian constitution.
[06:21.220 --> 06:32.580] But before we get to that, if you thought about my argument that I'm bringing about
[06:32.580 --> 06:42.020] having to demand a right in order to enjoy a right.
[06:42.020 --> 06:43.020] Have I thought about it?
[06:43.020 --> 06:51.460] Well, I think a perfectly solid case to stand.
[06:51.460 --> 06:59.300] You had mentioned that people have a right to an examining trial or a right to things
[06:59.300 --> 07:05.260] about due process, and some public officials trying to set it.
[07:05.260 --> 07:11.700] We have to demand it in order to have a right, and I think you're exactly correct in asserting
[07:11.700 --> 07:16.620] that the constitution doesn't create these rights for us or prescribe...
[07:16.620 --> 07:26.780] Let me give everybody an intro so they'll know what we're talking about.
[07:26.780 --> 07:27.780] Barker Wingo.
[07:27.780 --> 07:37.180] Barker Wingo is the controlling case on speedy trial, or the seminal case on speeding trial.
[07:37.180 --> 07:43.980] It outlines a list of requirements for speedy trial.
[07:43.980 --> 07:53.340] One of them is that you have to timely request a speedy trial, and you have to effectively
[07:53.340 --> 07:58.300] request a speedy trial.
[07:58.300 --> 08:05.140] You can't just say this wasn't done quick enough.
[08:05.140 --> 08:08.940] You have to demand a speedy trial in order to have a right to one.
[08:08.940 --> 08:13.220] Where the heck did they come up with that crap?
[08:13.220 --> 08:19.620] Speedy trial is not a right, and the courts like to talk about these things as rights.
[08:19.620 --> 08:27.300] First amendment to the constitution... There's only one amendment to the constitution, actually.
[08:27.300 --> 08:34.020] Those amendments to the constitution do not grant you any rights.
[08:34.020 --> 08:45.740] Those amendments to the constitution forbid public officials from doing certain things
[08:45.740 --> 08:55.220] that deny you in certain advantages or privileges or immunities.
[08:55.220 --> 09:08.140] It commands public officials to ensure that each citizen be granted a speedy trial or
[09:08.140 --> 09:15.180] be brought to trial speedily.
[09:15.180 --> 09:16.940] I don't know how it is in the Fed.
[09:16.940 --> 09:20.580] Yeah, I do know how it is in the Fed, but I'm not arguing the Fed in this case.
[09:20.580 --> 09:23.140] I'm arguing Texas.
[09:23.140 --> 09:30.020] I know that... Barker Wingo is a federal case, but we have state cases that directly
[09:30.020 --> 09:33.140] follow Barker Wingo.
[09:33.140 --> 09:38.140] They say you have to meet these requirements.
[09:38.140 --> 09:44.940] One of them is that you demanded a speedy trial, and you did so timely, and you did
[09:44.940 --> 09:49.380] so specifically.
[09:49.380 --> 09:52.380] I'm saying, when the heck did you come up with that?
[09:52.380 --> 09:57.140] The constitution commands you to do this thing.
[09:57.140 --> 10:03.740] Before you were allowed to take office, you were required to swear on your oath that you
[10:03.740 --> 10:05.460] would do this thing.
[10:05.460 --> 10:09.100] It didn't have anything to do about Randy's rights.
[10:09.100 --> 10:17.260] Yeah, it didn't have anything to do with whether or not I demanded that you do what you promised
[10:17.260 --> 10:19.260] you would do.
[10:19.260 --> 10:27.900] Now, if I'm speeding, they're not going to come to me and say, do you demand your right
[10:27.900 --> 10:30.900] to be ticketed?
[10:30.900 --> 10:32.380] The police order to do that.
[10:32.380 --> 10:35.260] It's part of their job.
[10:35.260 --> 10:39.980] All of our public officials were ordered to give us a speedy trial.
[10:39.980 --> 10:47.860] Where did they come up with this notion that what they are commanded to do by constitution,
[10:47.860 --> 10:55.740] what they agree to do by contract, and the oath of office creates a contract?
[10:55.740 --> 11:01.300] A lot of these guys say that you can't take the office unless you file the oath.
[11:01.300 --> 11:03.820] Well, yeah, maybe.
[11:03.820 --> 11:11.700] If the government pays you money in furtherance of a contract, and you accept that money in
[11:11.700 --> 11:13.980] furtherance of the contract, there's a contract.
[11:13.980 --> 11:19.100] Whether you swore on your oath or not, you're bound to that oath.
[11:19.100 --> 11:25.220] And I don't see any verbiage in the constitution that makes it conditional on me demanding
[11:25.220 --> 11:26.980] it.
[11:26.980 --> 11:31.740] And the state of Texas had said the same thing about an examining trial.
[11:31.740 --> 11:38.180] Well, Gerstein Pugh, the controlling case from the Fed concerning examining trials,
[11:38.180 --> 11:44.220] says that the state must provide a preliminary hearing.
[11:44.220 --> 11:45.940] That's what they call it in the Fed.
[11:45.940 --> 11:49.620] It don't say anything about if we ask for it.
[11:49.620 --> 11:52.460] It says you must do that.
[11:52.460 --> 12:01.940] So I'm taking on the argument that regardless of whether or not I ask for a speedy trial,
[12:01.940 --> 12:12.540] these public officials are commanded by statute, and Texas Article 1, Section 28, I see we've
[12:12.540 --> 12:13.540] got 28 and 29.
[12:13.540 --> 12:16.740] I need to look up 28 again.
[12:16.740 --> 12:26.740] Section 29 says that all of the rights enumerated in this section, in order to avoid the abuses
[12:26.740 --> 12:33.460] of the high powers of government, all of the rights enumerated in this section shall be
[12:33.460 --> 12:37.380] held in violence in perpetuity.
[12:37.380 --> 12:40.380] Now, the-
[12:40.380 --> 12:43.140] That sounds like they meant for it to be permanent.
[12:43.140 --> 12:45.980] It sounded to me.
[12:45.980 --> 12:49.580] I thought that was pretty specific.
[12:49.580 --> 13:04.380] In violent in perpetuity, Texas Constitution, I'm going to call one section.
[13:04.380 --> 13:09.700] I can't, I don't multitask very well.
[13:09.700 --> 13:19.140] Section 28, I didn't see anything, we should watch here about that.
[13:19.140 --> 13:23.260] See, no powers, oh, here it is.
[13:23.260 --> 13:30.740] 29 says that all of the rights in this section shall be held in violent perpetuity.
[13:30.740 --> 13:42.900] 28 says no power of suspending laws in this state shall be exercised except by the legislature.
[13:42.900 --> 13:54.020] So you look at the legislation, and the legislation doesn't say anything about the public, the
[13:54.020 --> 14:02.020] people having to demand their rights in order for the prohibitions included in the constitution
[14:02.020 --> 14:04.020] to apply to them.
[14:04.020 --> 14:08.660] I can't find it anywhere.
[14:08.660 --> 14:16.420] And one thing, you know, when I say that, that sounds pretty straightforward.
[14:16.420 --> 14:20.900] Anybody out there have a problem understanding that?
[14:20.900 --> 14:25.460] So why don't I find case law on it?
[14:25.460 --> 14:30.420] Why don't I find that someone has challenged that?
[14:30.420 --> 14:34.060] I'm not finding it.
[14:34.060 --> 14:41.300] And I suspect it really seems to be the case with some of these sensitive cash cow subjects
[14:41.300 --> 14:42.300] of theirs.
[14:42.300 --> 14:47.260] We don't seem to find any case law that would be really clear in our favor.
[14:47.260 --> 14:48.260] Wonder why?
[14:48.260 --> 14:58.220] The reason why is the same reason we won a petition for writ of mandamus in Fort Worth
[14:58.220 --> 15:08.340] when we challenged the application of an ordinance to the general public.
[15:08.340 --> 15:14.260] Because the court of appeals looked at that and said, holy mackerel, if that gets to the
[15:14.260 --> 15:20.180] supreme and the supreme rules that that is true, and what we argued was, is that only
[15:20.180 --> 15:22.980] the legislature can write law.
[15:22.980 --> 15:32.580] The legislature authorized municipalities and counties to write ordinances.
[15:32.580 --> 15:42.820] Now they didn't call them ordinances by mistake because the legislature is the single entity
[15:42.820 --> 15:46.500] authorized to write law.
[15:46.500 --> 15:48.980] And they cannot delegate that authority.
[15:48.980 --> 15:52.620] So they delegated the authority to write ordinances.
[15:52.620 --> 15:58.980] So these municipalities and counties can write all these ordinances they want to.
[15:58.980 --> 16:04.700] But they can't apply it to me or to you as the general public.
[16:04.700 --> 16:09.540] They can only apply it to employees of the corporation, the municipal corporation of
[16:09.540 --> 16:18.180] the county, or to those in contractual privity wherein they have agreed to the statutory
[16:18.180 --> 16:19.180] scheme.
[16:19.180 --> 16:24.260] If they apply it to you and me, then that would have the effect of a law and would be
[16:24.260 --> 16:28.140] an unconstitutional application of the ordinance.
[16:28.140 --> 16:33.260] They look at that and say, we do not want that to get before the supreme.
[16:33.260 --> 16:39.940] If they rule in his favor, all of our ordinances are trash.
[16:39.940 --> 16:42.060] This issue is the same.
[16:42.060 --> 16:47.380] They do not want it getting before the legislature because if they get ruled against all this,
[16:47.380 --> 16:50.980] you have to demand that garbage goes in the trash.
[16:50.980 --> 17:00.300] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Love Radio, we'll be right back.
[17:00.300 --> 17:05.060] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[17:05.060 --> 17:09.060] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[17:09.060 --> 17:13.380] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.380 --> 17:14.380] can win too.
[17:14.380 --> 17:19.340] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.340 --> 17:24.980] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:24.980 --> 17:29.620] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[17:29.620 --> 17:33.820] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.820 --> 17:38.940] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.940 --> 17:41.100] Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.100 --> 17:46.620] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.620 --> 17:49.620] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.620 --> 17:58.620] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[17:58.620 --> 17:59.620] collectors now.
[17:59.620 --> 18:04.620] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[18:04.620 --> 18:08.540] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[18:08.540 --> 18:12.380] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.380 --> 18:15.700] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.700 --> 18:19.740] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.740 --> 18:23.580] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.580 --> 18:24.940] our rights through due process.
[18:24.940 --> 18:28.940] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.940 --> 18:32.700] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.700 --> 18:34.700] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.700 --> 18:39.060] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.060 --> 18:40.420] ordering your copy today.
[18:40.420 --> 18:43.740] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.740 --> 18:48.180] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.180 --> 18:50.500] documents, and other useful resource material.
[18:50.500 --> 18:54.460] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.460 --> 19:01.460] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[19:24.460 --> 19:43.260] The world is spinning like it's out of control, on the edge of a hole, inside a deep dark
[19:43.260 --> 19:44.260] dome.
[19:44.260 --> 19:49.260] I'm always going to look out for something to soothe my soul.
[19:49.260 --> 19:56.260] So I sit back and I watch the evidence unfold, and I see justice is the goal, yeah, justice
[19:56.260 --> 19:57.260] is the goal.
[19:57.260 --> 20:12.260] Time to settle a little too far at sea, and then we got to get back on course quickly.
[20:12.260 --> 20:22.260] So we go under heavy advisory, from the man that came all the way from Galilee.
[20:22.260 --> 20:30.260] I'm looking for a safe and warm place to be, where I don't have to work so hard to be free.
[20:30.260 --> 20:33.260] Some guys are trying to reach me, but they got caught.
[20:33.260 --> 20:36.260] Now the guys got the payments like justice.
[20:36.260 --> 20:41.260] And we're still trying to get our guests in, we're having some issues getting Skype worked
[20:41.260 --> 20:42.260] out.
[20:42.260 --> 20:49.260] My fault that I didn't do this two hours early, so everybody gets to blame me.
[20:49.260 --> 20:51.260] Poor me, poor me.
[20:51.260 --> 20:58.260] But anyway, this is one of those issues, and I've talked about this before.
[20:58.260 --> 21:05.260] I'm not turning the phone lines on yet, because we're trying to get this guest on.
[21:05.260 --> 21:14.260] Whenever you take these guys on, you want to look for questions they're not going to
[21:14.260 --> 21:17.260] want answered.
[21:17.260 --> 21:23.260] That way, in order to keep them from getting answered, they'll come to you and make you
[21:23.260 --> 21:27.260] this offer to get you to go away.
[21:27.260 --> 21:36.260] But it's always best to, when you take the issues on, to start to fight yourself.
[21:36.260 --> 21:43.260] In this case, I was arrested, thrown in jail all night, let out the next day, and that
[21:43.260 --> 21:44.260] was separate.
[21:44.260 --> 21:46.260] That was a criminal prosecution.
[21:46.260 --> 21:52.260] Okay, I handled the criminal prosecution, but separate from that, when they made the
[21:52.260 --> 22:00.260] arrest, they did stuff wrong, and what they did wrong has nothing to do with the charges
[22:00.260 --> 22:02.260] against me.
[22:02.260 --> 22:08.260] But they did wrong, they did wrong, so I start a fight with them.
[22:08.260 --> 22:13.260] I file criminal charges against them, and then I come back and sue them personally.
[22:13.260 --> 22:15.260] So I picked this fight.
[22:15.260 --> 22:17.260] It's my fight.
[22:17.260 --> 22:26.260] And when you sue them, then they have one calculation.
[22:26.260 --> 22:30.260] How much money are we going to lose?
[22:30.260 --> 22:32.260] Because they're going to lose money.
[22:32.260 --> 22:36.260] Whether they win the case or not, they're going to lose money.
[22:36.260 --> 22:45.260] Because even if the court grants you attorney fees, generally they don't do that unless
[22:45.260 --> 22:50.260] you have a really frivolous claim.
[22:50.260 --> 22:55.260] What you want to do is bring a claim that they do not want to hear.
[22:55.260 --> 23:02.260] You want to bring either a first blush issue, something that hasn't been directly
[23:02.260 --> 23:10.260] addressed by the court, or you want to bring an issue where you ask the court to
[23:10.260 --> 23:15.260] distinguish or overturn case law.
[23:15.260 --> 23:21.260] In this case, I forget the name of the case that cites Barker-Wingo, I think it's
[23:21.260 --> 23:24.260] Can-2-V somebody.
[23:24.260 --> 23:27.260] The Can-2-V state, I think it is.
[23:27.260 --> 23:34.260] And it cites Barker-Wingo and says that you have to demand a speedy trial and you
[23:34.260 --> 23:40.260] have to demand it timely, and oh, there's a couple other things.
[23:40.260 --> 23:44.260] And I'm saying absolutely not.
[23:44.260 --> 23:54.260] You need to distinguish Can-2 and all of Can-2's progeny and say that while there
[23:54.260 --> 24:03.260] may be some things that you must do, demanding that a public official abide by a
[24:03.260 --> 24:08.260] constitutional prohibition is not something we have to do.
[24:08.260 --> 24:11.260] That section needs to be overturned.
[24:11.260 --> 24:17.260] The case needs to be distinguished by stating that that requirement is
[24:17.260 --> 24:21.260] unconstitutional.
[24:21.260 --> 24:29.260] And they're going to look at that and say, okay, what happens if this gets to the
[24:29.260 --> 24:32.260] Supreme Court?
[24:32.260 --> 24:36.260] And in this case, it's Texas, since if this would be a civil case, it'd go to the
[24:36.260 --> 24:38.260] Supreme Court.
[24:38.260 --> 24:46.260] What is the likelihood that the Supreme Court will get this and not rule in my
[24:46.260 --> 24:49.260] favor?
[24:49.260 --> 24:54.260] Because if they don't rule in my favor, because these are constitutional
[24:54.260 --> 25:01.260] restrictions, the exact same issue applies in the Fed.
[25:01.260 --> 25:05.260] So I'll bring them out to the Fed.
[25:05.260 --> 25:13.260] And in this case, I could sue the state in the Fed.
[25:13.260 --> 25:20.260] If I sue the state in the Fed, then I sue them in the Supreme.
[25:20.260 --> 25:25.260] You don't have to go through the district courts and court of appeals.
[25:25.260 --> 25:27.260] You sue them directly.
[25:27.260 --> 25:31.260] When you sue the sovereign, you sue him in the Supreme.
[25:31.260 --> 25:33.260] So this would go straight to the Supreme.
[25:33.260 --> 25:41.260] And these judges have to look at this and say, what are the chances that the
[25:41.260 --> 25:45.260] Supreme's going to agree with this guy?
[25:45.260 --> 25:49.260] And what happens if he does?
[25:49.260 --> 25:52.260] Now we got a problem.
[25:52.260 --> 25:58.260] But we got another problem with the Speedy Trial Act.
[25:58.260 --> 26:08.260] They quit granting speedy trials at all because they objected to the title of
[26:08.260 --> 26:13.260] the statute, and for some reason they called that unconstitutional.
[26:13.260 --> 26:14.260] I read it.
[26:14.260 --> 26:15.260] It didn't make sense.
[26:15.260 --> 26:21.260] And they had another minor issue they complained about and overturned the
[26:21.260 --> 26:25.260] Speedy Trial Act as unconstitutional.
[26:25.260 --> 26:33.260] What they did not overturn is the preamble to the Speedy Trial Act.
[26:33.260 --> 26:41.260] And the Speedy Trial Act specifically stated that what constituted a speedy
[26:41.260 --> 26:50.260] trial is a trial within 30 days on a Class A misdemeanor, 60 Class B, 90
[26:50.260 --> 26:56.260] Class A, 120 felony.
[26:56.260 --> 27:04.260] That's what the legislature intended to be construed as a speedy trial.
[27:04.260 --> 27:10.260] And this Cantu v. State, I think the guy had taken either three or five years
[27:10.260 --> 27:12.260] to get him to court.
[27:12.260 --> 27:20.260] And they're raising a question as to whether or not that was speedy.
[27:20.260 --> 27:26.260] And according to the stated intent of the legislature, and when you address
[27:26.260 --> 27:31.260] these issues, you don't just look at what the code says.
[27:31.260 --> 27:37.260] You've got these guys out there that say, oh, the statutes don't apply.
[27:37.260 --> 27:41.260] Well, that's kind of true and kind of not.
[27:41.260 --> 27:44.260] They say the statutes are not the law, and that's true.
[27:44.260 --> 27:46.260] They are not the law.
[27:46.260 --> 27:54.260] The statutes are codified representations of the public laws.
[27:54.260 --> 28:02.260] To the degree that the statute or code accurately reflects the intent of the
[28:02.260 --> 28:09.260] legislature as passed in the public law, then the statute of code applies.
[28:09.260 --> 28:15.260] If it is different or takes us to a different place other than the clear intent
[28:15.260 --> 28:18.260] of the legislature, then it doesn't apply.
[28:18.260 --> 28:21.260] Then you go back to the intent of the legislature.
[28:21.260 --> 28:26.260] So the way to do this is go find the bill that was filed.
[28:26.260 --> 28:32.260] The bill will have a statement of intent in the beginning of the bill.
[28:32.260 --> 28:39.260] And in the Speedy Trial Act, it states very specifically what a speedy trial is,
[28:39.260 --> 28:42.260] 30, 60, 90, 120 days.
[28:42.260 --> 28:45.260] Anybody here ever been prosecuted in Texas?
[28:45.260 --> 28:50.260] Did you ever get to trial before two years?
[28:50.260 --> 28:53.260] They take forever.
[28:53.260 --> 28:56.260] Go ahead.
[28:56.260 --> 29:00.260] No, I'm saying they take forever.
[29:00.260 --> 29:05.260] Yeah, and the whole point of it is they've eliminated your right to a speedy
[29:05.260 --> 29:11.260] trial so the prosecutor, if you get bailed out, then he has you come in every
[29:11.260 --> 29:15.260] month or two and spend the day sitting in court, and he offers you a deal,
[29:15.260 --> 29:17.260] never has a hearing.
[29:17.260 --> 29:19.260] If you don't take the deal, he sends you home.
[29:19.260 --> 29:25.260] Well, Section 28 Code of Criminal Procedure, he can't call you in to meet with
[29:25.260 --> 29:26.260] the prosecutor, but he does anyway.
[29:26.260 --> 29:29.260] He'll do that until you take a deal.
[29:29.260 --> 29:32.260] If it takes two, three, five years, he don't care.
[29:32.260 --> 29:36.260] If you can't get bailed out, he'll come to you in jail, leave you sitting in
[29:36.260 --> 29:39.260] jail until you take a deal.
[29:39.260 --> 29:47.260] That's how they get a conviction rate of 99.6, by ignoring your right to a
[29:47.260 --> 29:48.260] speedy trial.
[29:48.260 --> 29:52.260] Hang on, Randy Kelly and Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[29:52.260 --> 30:05.260] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they
[30:05.260 --> 30:07.260] negatively affected our health?
[30:07.260 --> 30:10.260] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new
[30:10.260 --> 30:14.260] findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:14.260 --> 30:16.260] Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.260 --> 30:20.260] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.260 --> 30:24.260] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to
[30:24.260 --> 30:25.260] vanish, too.
[30:25.260 --> 30:26.260] So protect your rights.
[30:26.260 --> 30:30.260] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.260 --> 30:32.260] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.260 --> 30:36.260] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the
[30:36.260 --> 30:40.260] private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.260 --> 30:44.260] Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.260 --> 30:46.260] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy.
[30:46.260 --> 30:47.260] It's a fact.
[30:47.260 --> 30:50.260] But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation
[30:50.260 --> 30:52.260] near your head has been disputed.
[30:52.260 --> 30:55.260] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have
[30:55.260 --> 30:57.260] downplayed concerns.
[30:57.260 --> 31:00.260] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming
[31:00.260 --> 31:02.260] that cell phones affect brain chemistry.
[31:02.260 --> 31:07.260] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the
[31:07.260 --> 31:11.260] brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:11.260 --> 31:14.260] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not
[31:14.260 --> 31:16.260] taking any chances.
[31:16.260 --> 31:20.260] I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:20.260 --> 31:21.260] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.260 --> 31:30.260] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.260 --> 31:31.260] I lost my son.
[31:31.260 --> 31:32.260] My nephew.
[31:32.260 --> 31:33.260] My uncle.
[31:33.260 --> 31:34.260] My son.
[31:34.260 --> 31:35.260] On September 11, 2001.
[31:35.260 --> 31:38.260] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:38.260 --> 31:42.260] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.260 --> 31:46.260] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[31:46.260 --> 31:50.260] over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[31:50.260 --> 31:52.260] and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.260 --> 31:53.260] Bring justice to my son.
[31:53.260 --> 31:54.260] My uncle.
[31:54.260 --> 31:55.260] My nephew.
[31:55.260 --> 31:56.260] My son.
[31:56.260 --> 31:57.260] Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.260 --> 32:01.260] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.260 --> 32:04.260] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better
[32:04.260 --> 32:06.260] understanding of His Word?
[32:06.260 --> 32:10.260] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[32:10.260 --> 32:14.260] Central Time for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss
[32:14.260 --> 32:17.260] the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:17.260 --> 32:21.260] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not
[32:21.260 --> 32:24.260] to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
[32:24.260 --> 32:28.260] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[32:28.260 --> 32:32.260] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:32.260 --> 32:36.260] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions
[32:36.260 --> 32:39.260] on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[32:39.260 --> 32:43.260] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a
[32:43.260 --> 32:44.260] hearing ear.
[32:44.260 --> 32:47.260] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more
[32:47.260 --> 32:50.260] into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:50.260 --> 32:54.260] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[32:54.260 --> 32:56.260] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[32:56.260 --> 33:00.260] to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:03.260 --> 33:06.260] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[33:06.260 --> 33:10.260] at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:36.260 --> 33:40.260] This is a rest for the team
[33:40.260 --> 33:44.260] Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me
[33:44.260 --> 33:46.260] Prosecute them wicked leaders, you see
[33:46.260 --> 33:49.260] The mama heard her a liar, them tell me
[33:49.260 --> 33:51.260] Them a liar not tell sweet stories
[33:51.260 --> 33:53.260] Me not believe, me say what them tell me
[33:53.260 --> 33:56.260] 3% of America vote for Bushy
[33:56.260 --> 33:58.260] So how the hell he get the presidency?
[33:58.260 --> 34:01.260] That's why me have a warrant for him
[34:01.260 --> 34:03.260] Everybody listen carefully
[34:03.260 --> 34:05.260] Listen to the words and the issues proceed
[34:05.260 --> 34:10.260] Citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy
[34:10.260 --> 34:14.260] A warrant for Dick Cheney
[34:14.260 --> 34:19.260] Citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy
[34:19.260 --> 34:24.260] A warrant and a fine for Dick Cheney
[34:24.260 --> 34:26.260] Well, we no food and no spill
[34:26.260 --> 34:27.260] Warrant for him
[34:27.260 --> 34:30.260] All Dick Cheney warrants for him
[34:30.260 --> 34:32.260] Fight about the citizens in the country
[34:32.260 --> 34:34.260] Them getting so mad and them getting angry
[34:34.260 --> 34:37.260] We have some warrant we need to solve
[34:37.260 --> 34:39.260] Need a prosecutor to come and help me
[34:39.260 --> 34:42.260] Prosecutor from any state will do
[34:42.260 --> 34:44.260] Come over and let me show them too
[34:44.260 --> 34:47.260] Hear them tell you 3 issues
[34:47.260 --> 34:49.260] Plus it's strictly true, that is true
[34:49.260 --> 34:51.260] They Silverstein me do
[34:51.260 --> 34:54.260] You get the citizens arrest too
[34:54.260 --> 34:56.260] Silverstein and Hamilton clean
[34:56.260 --> 34:59.260] You know them and them and them not clean
[34:59.260 --> 35:01.260] Everybody bring them in
[35:01.260 --> 35:04.260] So we could solve them with warranting
[35:04.260 --> 35:06.260] They no need me to continue
[35:06.260 --> 35:08.260] You know them like me say with them skin
[35:08.260 --> 35:13.260] Citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy
[35:13.260 --> 35:17.260] Citizens arrest for Dick Cheney
[35:17.260 --> 35:22.260] Citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy
[35:22.260 --> 35:27.260] Citizens arrest for Dick Cheney
[35:27.260 --> 35:29.260] All these guys in the three suit
[35:29.260 --> 35:32.260] All them I do them I tell I to wait
[35:32.260 --> 35:34.260] In them three suit and tie
[35:34.260 --> 35:36.260] And them I walk and I tell no fly
[35:36.260 --> 35:39.260] That's why we have to persecute them
[35:39.260 --> 35:41.260] And we have to let them know we no place
[35:41.260 --> 35:43.260] Put your finger, do or feel away
[35:43.260 --> 35:46.260] Tell the truth here in America me say
[35:46.260 --> 35:48.260] Only 3% both from Mr. Bushy
[35:48.260 --> 35:51.260] How the hell the man become presidency
[35:51.260 --> 35:53.260] But you know I want to come arrest
[35:53.260 --> 35:56.260] So I have a citizens arrest from Mr. Bushy
[35:56.260 --> 36:00.260] Have a warrant for Dick Cheney
[36:00.260 --> 36:05.260] Have a warrant for Dick Cheney
[36:05.260 --> 36:10.260] Have another warrant from Spears
[36:10.260 --> 36:15.260] Have another warrant from Candy Rice
[36:15.260 --> 36:18.260] Have another warrant from everybody
[36:18.260 --> 36:21.260] Listen me and listen me carefully
[36:21.260 --> 36:23.260] They be a big man they need no seat
[36:23.260 --> 36:26.260] No one have no mercy for them
[36:26.260 --> 36:28.260] Because they never have no mercy for the country
[36:28.260 --> 36:30.260] Do not see how them a trick badly
[36:30.260 --> 36:33.260] Citizens of the country is angry
[36:33.260 --> 36:35.260] That's why me have a warrant to see
[36:35.260 --> 36:38.260] To arrest them big man go round we
[36:38.260 --> 36:40.260] Citizens everybody come listen me
[36:40.260 --> 36:42.260] Citizens have a warrant for Bushy
[36:42.260 --> 36:45.260] Never citizens have a warrant for Dick Cheney
[36:45.260 --> 36:47.260] And so you get to know we go take a country
[36:47.260 --> 36:49.260] Can't let the big man here fool we
[36:49.260 --> 36:52.260] When we point the finger people agree
[36:52.260 --> 36:54.260] We don't see them don't steal election from we
[36:54.260 --> 36:57.260] Silver spin a hammer continue
[36:57.260 --> 36:59.260] Then the man hold me say then we kill you see
[36:59.260 --> 37:01.260] They the same one we say all a rob we
[37:01.260 --> 37:04.260] 50 vote machine so Bush could win it
[37:04.260 --> 37:06.260] That's the kind of thing that we see is angry
[37:06.260 --> 37:09.260] How we pass up things we want went
[37:09.260 --> 37:11.260] Somebody need to come help you do it
[37:11.260 --> 37:13.260] Need a prosecutor from the country
[37:13.260 --> 37:16.260] Middle business we steady prosecutor come from the sea
[37:16.260 --> 37:18.260] Everybody know don't take it easy
[37:18.260 --> 37:21.260] Get up you have to get angry
[37:21.260 --> 37:35.260] We have a special guest Amanda Riddick
[37:35.260 --> 37:41.260] She's out of California and she's working on
[37:41.260 --> 37:44.260] Fundamental rights and freedoms in Canada
[37:44.260 --> 37:48.260] That have been undermined in Canada
[37:48.260 --> 37:57.260] Amanda how did you get involved in this particular issue
[37:57.260 --> 38:01.260] Okay well actually just to correct you
[38:01.260 --> 38:04.260] I'm a real estate agent from Ontario Canada
[38:04.260 --> 38:09.260] And I knew something had been wrong for a long time
[38:09.260 --> 38:12.260] Started to try and figure out you know
[38:12.260 --> 38:15.260] What is going on in the system that people are
[38:15.260 --> 38:19.260] Getting pulled into court for for
[38:19.260 --> 38:22.260] Nonsense reasons and we call them kangaroo
[38:22.260 --> 38:25.260] Courts up here in Canada and there's a reason why
[38:25.260 --> 38:28.260] We call them kangaroo courts and after the last
[38:28.260 --> 38:31.260] Three years I knew I had to ramp up my research
[38:31.260 --> 38:35.260] And that's when I became aware that in fact Canada
[38:35.260 --> 38:38.260] Has a constitution and most Canadians don't know it
[38:38.260 --> 38:41.260] And what I discovered or what I've been discovering
[38:41.260 --> 38:44.260] Is it doesn't matter how old you are in Canada
[38:44.260 --> 38:47.260] You probably never had a civics class in your entire
[38:47.260 --> 38:54.260] Life because they don't give us civics classes up here
[38:54.260 --> 38:59.260] Okay they stopped giving civics classes here as well
[38:59.260 --> 39:02.260] And I'm not sure if that's a bad thing or a good thing
[39:02.260 --> 39:07.260] So they do have this doesn't make sense to me
[39:07.260 --> 39:11.260] You have a constitution but nobody knows
[39:11.260 --> 39:15.260] Do you not have
[39:15.260 --> 39:17.260] Go ahead
[39:17.260 --> 39:19.260] I was just going to say well that's the importance of
[39:19.260 --> 39:24.260] Civics classes now if you don't have civics classes
[39:24.260 --> 39:26.260] You won't learn that you have a constitution
[39:26.260 --> 39:28.260] You won't learn that you have a bill of rights
[39:28.260 --> 39:31.260] That's the other thing Canadians have a bill of rights
[39:31.260 --> 39:33.260] Canadians don't know they have a bill of rights
[39:33.260 --> 39:38.260] What they think of when you hear about a rights bill
[39:38.260 --> 39:40.260] Is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[39:40.260 --> 39:42.260] Which is a Trojan Horse
[39:42.260 --> 39:45.260] It's designed to crush your rights not protect them
[39:45.260 --> 39:48.260] So Canadians have a constitution
[39:48.260 --> 39:51.260] And we have a bill of rights
[39:51.260 --> 39:54.260] Neither and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[39:54.260 --> 39:57.260] Is the thing that the government wants you to use
[39:57.260 --> 40:02.260] The last thing any Canadian should be using
[40:02.260 --> 40:08.260] So I'm kind of tripping over my tongue
[40:08.260 --> 40:12.260] Because here in the US when we're talking about
[40:12.260 --> 40:15.260] Interactions with the courts or police
[40:15.260 --> 40:18.260] Constitutional rights are come out of our mouth
[40:18.260 --> 40:21.260] As every other word
[40:21.260 --> 40:24.260] So after all this time to hear that
[40:24.260 --> 40:27.260] For the most part Canadians don't know
[40:27.260 --> 40:32.260] They have a constitution that's incredible
[40:32.260 --> 40:39.260] How is the constitution in Canada
[40:39.260 --> 40:47.260] Different than the Charter of Rights
[40:47.260 --> 40:49.260] Did I get that right?
[40:49.260 --> 40:54.260] Yes you said Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[40:54.260 --> 40:59.260] How is that different than the constitution?
[40:59.260 --> 41:02.260] Okay I'm going to take a couple of minutes
[41:02.260 --> 41:04.260] Just to lay a foundation here
[41:04.260 --> 41:09.260] To begin Canada technically has two constitutions
[41:09.260 --> 41:14.260] The first constitution which is the supreme law of Canada
[41:14.260 --> 41:18.260] Is the Constitution Act of 1867
[41:18.260 --> 41:22.260] This constitution is the constitution that
[41:22.260 --> 41:25.260] Either recognizes and continues
[41:25.260 --> 41:29.260] Or creates and establishes the bodies of government
[41:29.260 --> 41:34.260] And or characters that have the authority
[41:34.260 --> 41:37.260] It also establishes the class of subjects
[41:37.260 --> 41:40.260] That each body of government can create
[41:40.260 --> 41:44.260] Ministries for and the statutes for those ministries
[41:44.260 --> 41:49.260] So I'm not sure what the equivalent would be
[41:49.260 --> 41:52.260] In the United States
[41:52.260 --> 41:55.260] I think you guys would call them departments
[41:55.260 --> 42:00.260] So you'd have the Department of Transportation
[42:00.260 --> 42:02.260] We call it Ministry of Transportation
[42:02.260 --> 42:04.260] So I think that would sort of be the equivalent
[42:04.260 --> 42:07.260] Now the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[42:07.260 --> 42:10.260] Is part of our second constitution
[42:10.260 --> 42:12.260] The second constitution is known as
[42:12.260 --> 42:16.260] The Constitution Act of 1982
[42:16.260 --> 42:25.260] And the first 24 sections of the Constitution Act of 1982
[42:25.260 --> 42:28.260] Is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[42:28.260 --> 42:31.260] Which I will expand on in a few moments
[42:31.260 --> 42:35.260] But this Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[42:35.260 --> 42:38.260] Is supposed to be the
[42:38.260 --> 42:41.260] And it's the only thing they ever taught in school
[42:41.260 --> 42:44.260] Your charter rights
[42:44.260 --> 42:47.260] But the issue with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[42:47.260 --> 42:52.260] It is a limited civil rights bill
[42:52.260 --> 42:54.260] Not a human rights bill
[42:54.260 --> 42:56.260] It gives you rights
[42:56.260 --> 43:00.260] But it only guarantees the rights it gives you
[43:00.260 --> 43:03.260] In the first 23 paragraphs
[43:03.260 --> 43:06.260] And they can only use it against you if you invoke it
[43:06.260 --> 43:09.260] And you have to invoke it under Section 24
[43:09.260 --> 43:11.260] But I can expand on that in a minute
[43:11.260 --> 43:13.260] But that's sort of the premise
[43:13.260 --> 43:17.260] So one creates the authority for our governments
[43:17.260 --> 43:19.260] And the characters of those governments
[43:19.260 --> 43:23.260] And the other side kind of cleans up a few issues
[43:23.260 --> 43:27.260] And creates a Trojan horse civil rights bill
[43:27.260 --> 43:31.260] That they've literally been using against Canadians
[43:31.260 --> 43:33.260] For the last three years
[43:33.260 --> 43:35.260] As I believe it was designed to do
[43:35.260 --> 43:40.260] Okay, hang on
[43:40.260 --> 43:42.260] We're going to our sponsors
[43:42.260 --> 43:46.260] Brandy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Radio
[43:46.260 --> 43:49.260] Hang on, we'll be right back
[43:58.260 --> 44:00.260] Through advances in technology
[44:00.260 --> 44:02.260] Our lives have greatly improved
[44:02.260 --> 44:05.260] Except in the area of nutrition
[44:05.260 --> 44:08.260] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[44:08.260 --> 44:10.260] And it's time we changed all that
[44:10.260 --> 44:13.260] Our primary defense against aging and disease
[44:13.260 --> 44:16.260] In this toxic environment is good nutrition
[44:16.260 --> 44:19.260] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated
[44:19.260 --> 44:21.260] Adulterated and mutilated
[44:21.260 --> 44:24.260] Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[44:24.260 --> 44:27.260] Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[44:27.260 --> 44:29.260] To endorse all sorts of products
[44:29.260 --> 44:30.260] Most of which we reject
[44:30.260 --> 44:33.260] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much
[44:33.260 --> 44:35.260] We became a marketing distributor
[44:35.260 --> 44:39.260] Along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others
[44:39.260 --> 44:42.260] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com
[44:42.260 --> 44:44.260] Your health will improve
[44:44.260 --> 44:47.260] As you help support quality radio
[44:47.260 --> 44:49.260] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity
[44:49.260 --> 44:51.260] You may want to join us
[44:51.260 --> 44:54.260] As a distributor, you can experience improved health
[44:54.260 --> 44:56.260] Help your friends and family
[44:56.260 --> 44:58.260] And increase your income
[44:58.260 --> 45:00.260] Order now
[45:28.260 --> 45:31.260] This dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[45:31.260 --> 45:34.260] With 22 years of case winning experience
[45:34.260 --> 45:36.260] Even if you're not in a lawsuit
[45:36.260 --> 45:39.260] You can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.260 --> 45:41.260] About the principles and practices
[45:41.260 --> 45:43.260] That control our American courts
[45:43.260 --> 45:45.260] You'll receive our audio classroom
[45:45.260 --> 45:48.260] Video seminar, tutorials
[45:48.260 --> 45:51.260] Forms for civil cases, pro se tactics
[45:51.260 --> 45:52.260] And much more
[45:52.260 --> 45:55.260] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com
[45:55.260 --> 45:56.260] And click on the banner
[45:56.260 --> 46:00.260] Or call toll free, 866-LAW-EASY
[46:26.260 --> 46:30.260] I must be careful what I'm wishing for
[46:30.260 --> 46:35.260] When I'm hungry I like to know just what I'm fishing for
[46:35.260 --> 46:37.260] I ain't asking for much
[46:37.260 --> 46:41.260] I ain't trying to be no glutton
[46:41.260 --> 46:47.260] I'm just here making my living pushing buttons
[46:47.260 --> 46:53.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[46:53.260 --> 46:56.260] For bravery and against slavery
[46:56.260 --> 46:58.260] Showing resistance
[46:58.260 --> 47:01.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[47:01.260 --> 47:03.260] Then I start strutting
[47:03.260 --> 47:08.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[47:08.260 --> 47:11.260] We sat down to play Monopoly
[47:11.260 --> 47:14.260] We all wanted to win the game
[47:14.260 --> 47:17.260] We gave some guy endless money supply
[47:17.260 --> 47:20.260] We must have not been thinking with brains
[47:20.260 --> 47:22.260] After some time, the worth of my time
[47:22.260 --> 47:24.260] Got me down to dinner
[47:24.260 --> 47:26.260] Nothing I might have been to know
[47:26.260 --> 47:31.260] I'm just here making my living pushing buttons
[47:31.260 --> 47:36.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[47:36.260 --> 47:38.260] For bravery and against slavery
[47:38.260 --> 47:40.260] Showing resistance
[47:40.260 --> 47:42.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[47:42.260 --> 47:44.260] Then I start strutting
[47:44.260 --> 47:49.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[47:49.260 --> 47:54.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[47:54.260 --> 47:57.260] For bravery and against slavery
[47:57.260 --> 47:59.260] Showing resistance
[47:59.260 --> 48:01.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[48:01.260 --> 48:03.260] Then I start strutting
[48:03.260 --> 48:08.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[48:08.260 --> 48:13.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[48:13.260 --> 48:16.260] For bravery and against slavery
[48:16.260 --> 48:18.260] Showing resistance
[48:18.260 --> 48:21.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[48:21.260 --> 48:23.260] Then I start strutting
[48:23.260 --> 48:28.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[48:28.260 --> 48:32.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[48:32.260 --> 48:34.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[48:34.260 --> 48:36.260] Then I start strutting
[48:36.260 --> 48:39.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[48:39.260 --> 48:45.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[48:45.260 --> 48:47.260] For bravery and against slavery
[48:47.260 --> 48:49.260] Showing resistance
[48:49.260 --> 48:50.260] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking
[48:50.260 --> 48:51.260] Then I start strutting
[48:51.260 --> 48:55.260] I'm just so glad to make my living pushing buttons
[48:55.260 --> 49:00.260] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[49:00.260 --> 49:03.720] you have, each state has its own constitution.
[49:03.720 --> 49:07.100] Canada only has one constitution.
[49:07.100 --> 49:10.140] The constitution of Canada creates the governments
[49:10.140 --> 49:13.060] for the federal and the provincial governments
[49:13.060 --> 49:15.120] in addition to the judiciary.
[49:17.420 --> 49:21.020] So it's all one constitution for all governments,
[49:21.020 --> 49:23.000] all governments under one constitution,
[49:23.000 --> 49:24.520] all for one, one for all,
[49:24.520 --> 49:26.480] and that is a constitutional monarchy.
[49:26.480 --> 49:31.480] Okay, how is this charter of rights
[49:38.260 --> 49:40.980] different from our bill of rights?
[49:43.220 --> 49:47.180] Well, for starters, we have the Canadian
[49:47.180 --> 49:48.700] Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[49:48.700 --> 49:51.980] and we have the Canadian Bill of Rights.
[49:51.980 --> 49:55.780] The Canadian Bill of Rights was brought to us
[49:55.780 --> 49:57.940] by the Diefenbaker government
[49:57.940 --> 50:02.220] and it came into effect on August 10th, 1960.
[50:02.220 --> 50:03.860] The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[50:03.860 --> 50:07.880] was brought in 1982 and that was brought
[50:07.880 --> 50:11.820] by the Pierre Elliott Trudeau government,
[50:11.820 --> 50:16.500] so Justin's daddy, and for those who don't know,
[50:16.500 --> 50:18.420] Justin, sort of Pierre Trudeau,
[50:18.420 --> 50:20.980] actually prior to becoming a liberal
[50:20.980 --> 50:22.660] was a card-carrying communist.
[50:22.660 --> 50:27.580] So now the charter, so with the Canadian Bill of Rights,
[50:27.580 --> 50:29.380] that is the Bill of Rights
[50:29.380 --> 50:30.860] that I'm trying to educate people on
[50:30.860 --> 50:35.620] because that is the true bill that protects,
[50:35.620 --> 50:37.860] recognizes and protects human rights
[50:37.860 --> 50:40.460] and fundamental freedoms in Canada.
[50:40.460 --> 50:43.560] The issue with the charter is section one.
[50:44.560 --> 50:45.760] Do you want me to expand?
[50:48.180 --> 50:49.820] Yes.
[50:49.820 --> 50:52.580] Okay, so the issue with the Canadian Charter
[50:52.580 --> 50:55.520] of Rights and Freedoms is section one
[50:55.520 --> 50:59.940] and I'm going to read the first part of section one.
[50:59.940 --> 51:00.880] And it starts out,
[51:00.880 --> 51:05.880] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees
[51:05.900 --> 51:09.780] the rights and freedoms set out in it,
[51:09.780 --> 51:10.860] it being the charter.
[51:10.860 --> 51:13.100] So I'm going to say that again,
[51:13.100 --> 51:16.100] substituting it for the charter.
[51:16.100 --> 51:19.600] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees
[51:19.600 --> 51:22.780] the rights and freedoms set out in the charter.
[51:22.780 --> 51:25.140] Andy, would you not agree that's a limitation?
[51:28.700 --> 51:29.820] Wait, I missed that.
[51:29.820 --> 51:33.140] The last sentence about limitation.
[51:33.140 --> 51:36.980] Yeah, she was saying, isn't that a limitation?
[51:36.980 --> 51:38.280] Okay, yeah.
[51:38.280 --> 51:42.980] Yeah, so if it, yeah, so if it guarantees
[51:42.980 --> 51:45.540] only what is set out in it,
[51:45.540 --> 51:47.940] then only what's in it is guaranteed.
[51:47.940 --> 51:50.580] So you're limited to what's in it.
[51:50.580 --> 51:54.660] Well, okay, that sounds like only what's in it
[51:54.660 --> 51:57.380] is guaranteed by it.
[51:57.380 --> 52:02.380] What about the Bill of Rights in your 1982 constitution?
[52:05.020 --> 52:06.700] There's no limiting clause on it.
[52:08.740 --> 52:13.540] Okay, which one has your, essentially your Bill of Rights?
[52:13.540 --> 52:18.540] Our Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960 is our Bill of Rights.
[52:20.060 --> 52:21.940] And in, hmm?
[52:21.940 --> 52:25.460] Is that one still in full force and effect?
[52:25.460 --> 52:29.460] 100%, in fact, under Section 3.1
[52:29.460 --> 52:30.660] of the Canadian Bill of Rights,
[52:30.660 --> 52:35.260] all federal legislation must pass pursuant
[52:35.260 --> 52:37.380] to Section 3.1 of the Bill of Rights,
[52:37.380 --> 52:40.860] must be passed through Section 3.1C
[52:40.860 --> 52:45.060] of the Statutory Instruments Act to ensure
[52:45.060 --> 52:49.660] that any new act of legislation coming into force
[52:49.660 --> 52:53.340] or potentially going to be put into, sorry,
[52:53.340 --> 52:56.020] submitted into the House of Commons for debate
[52:56.020 --> 52:58.060] and possibly passed into legislation
[52:58.060 --> 53:03.060] does not infringe, abridge or, sorry, invoked, sorry,
[53:06.020 --> 53:08.020] trespass, let me just go with trespass.
[53:08.020 --> 53:11.660] It doesn't trespass on any of your rights and freedoms.
[53:11.660 --> 53:16.660] So, and that's, and it actually is speaking
[53:16.900 --> 53:19.500] about your human rights and your fundamental freedoms,
[53:20.620 --> 53:22.020] which is the Bill of Rights.
[53:22.020 --> 53:25.820] So this charter would only be in addition
[53:25.820 --> 53:30.260] to the Bill of Rights in the 1962 constitution.
[53:31.060 --> 53:33.500] That 19, so the Bill of Rights
[53:33.500 --> 53:36.180] is a quasi-constitutional statute.
[53:36.180 --> 53:38.700] It's not part of the constitution,
[53:38.700 --> 53:43.700] but legislation pursuant to the Bill of Rights
[53:44.060 --> 53:49.060] must be vetted against the Bill of Rights.
[53:49.420 --> 53:53.860] So you can challenge, if there's anything in this charter
[53:53.860 --> 53:58.860] that is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights,
[53:58.900 --> 54:02.460] you can challenge the application of this charter.
[54:02.460 --> 54:03.300] Is that correct?
[54:03.300 --> 54:06.300] Well, actually, the intent here
[54:06.300 --> 54:09.140] and the message I'm trying to say is
[54:09.140 --> 54:11.180] don't even look at the charter.
[54:11.180 --> 54:12.820] Don't talk about the charter.
[54:12.820 --> 54:16.020] If the court says, are you invoking,
[54:16.020 --> 54:19.340] are you putting in the charter application, say no.
[54:20.780 --> 54:23.940] If you don't touch the charter, it becomes moot.
[54:24.900 --> 54:28.740] It's a dead horse that'll stay dead if you don't touch it
[54:28.740 --> 54:33.740] and you don't want to touch it.
[54:34.140 --> 54:38.420] Okay, so now I'm beginning to understand where you're going.
[54:38.420 --> 54:43.060] They have fostered this charter on the Canadian people
[54:43.980 --> 54:48.980] and they want the Canadian people to focus on the charter
[54:49.100 --> 54:52.100] and don't look behind the curtain
[54:52.100 --> 54:55.900] of the 1962 constitution or the Bill of Rights
[54:55.900 --> 54:58.300] attached to the 62 constitution.
[54:58.300 --> 54:59.220] Am I correct there?
[54:59.220 --> 55:01.060] Yes, correct.
[55:01.060 --> 55:05.380] So, and if you recall, Randy, when I started,
[55:05.380 --> 55:09.660] I said to you that it only guarantees what's in the charter,
[55:09.660 --> 55:12.340] what is absent from the charter.
[55:12.340 --> 55:13.740] And this is something I'm really trying
[55:13.740 --> 55:15.300] to drive home to people.
[55:15.300 --> 55:18.340] Don't just look for what you can find,
[55:18.340 --> 55:20.180] look for what you can't find.
[55:20.180 --> 55:24.500] So what is absent from the charter is human.
[55:24.500 --> 55:26.820] The word human doesn't exist in the charter,
[55:26.820 --> 55:28.700] which makes this a civil rights bill,
[55:28.700 --> 55:30.940] not a human rights bill.
[55:30.940 --> 55:34.140] Missing also from this is property rights.
[55:34.140 --> 55:37.140] Missing also from this is family.
[55:37.140 --> 55:40.220] Missing also from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[55:40.220 --> 55:42.900] is true equality before the law
[55:42.900 --> 55:45.140] and true protection of the law.
[55:45.140 --> 55:48.900] And I say true because the equality clause
[55:48.900 --> 55:52.580] in the charter is limited and you have to belong
[55:52.580 --> 55:56.940] to the prescribed list in order to have those rights.
[55:58.460 --> 56:00.700] This is a bit confusing.
[56:05.300 --> 56:07.140] Imagine being Canadian.
[56:07.140 --> 56:07.980] Yes.
[56:10.260 --> 56:15.260] So what I'm not getting is what are the,
[56:15.300 --> 56:20.020] how do these changes affect the individual
[56:20.020 --> 56:23.300] or the rights and privileges available to the individual?
[56:24.220 --> 56:29.220] Well, I only gave you the first half of section one.
[56:29.500 --> 56:33.740] The second half is referred to as the Mack Truck Clause.
[56:33.740 --> 56:35.540] I didn't come up with that term.
[56:36.420 --> 56:40.260] I read that term in an article
[56:41.300 --> 56:44.380] that refers to the Special Joint Committee
[56:44.380 --> 56:46.940] on the Constitution 1981.
[56:46.940 --> 56:50.580] And it was acknowledged in that Special Joint Committee
[56:50.580 --> 56:55.100] that section one was a Mack Truck Clause,
[56:55.100 --> 56:58.700] as in it'll drive right through your rights.
[56:58.700 --> 57:01.900] So the remainder of the sentence that I,
[57:01.900 --> 57:05.100] I talked to you about the limiting clause,
[57:05.100 --> 57:09.140] the remainder of it is only to such reasonable limits
[57:09.140 --> 57:13.060] prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified.
[57:13.060 --> 57:15.580] Now, remember, Randy, if your human rights
[57:15.580 --> 57:18.580] are not being protected to the bill
[57:21.380 --> 57:23.940] and your property rights aren't being protected,
[57:23.940 --> 57:27.420] well then, that demonstrably justified clause
[57:27.420 --> 57:30.740] essentially allows the government to decide
[57:30.740 --> 57:32.820] that if it's for the greater good,
[57:32.820 --> 57:35.820] then yes, it's demonstrably justified.
[57:35.820 --> 57:39.340] And another, and when you then take a look
[57:39.340 --> 57:42.100] at what they've done to our statutes,
[57:42.100 --> 57:46.300] changing the inherent jurisdiction of our courts
[57:46.300 --> 57:48.100] and other things like that,
[57:48.100 --> 57:50.780] literally perverting our law,
[57:51.740 --> 57:55.460] then yep, they're rewriting our,
[57:55.460 --> 57:56.700] they're rewriting the statute
[57:56.700 --> 57:59.700] without doing constitutional amendments.
[57:59.700 --> 58:02.260] So what's happening is the statutes
[58:02.260 --> 58:05.020] are becoming inconsistent with the Constitution,
[58:05.020 --> 58:07.940] much in the same way your municipal ordinances
[58:07.940 --> 58:09.220] are down there.
[58:09.220 --> 58:14.220] Okay, that, when we come back,
[58:14.420 --> 58:18.060] what I wanna talk to is remedy.
[58:18.060 --> 58:19.940] Is there a remedy?
[58:19.940 --> 58:24.940] Can you take these charter rulings
[58:25.300 --> 58:28.860] and test them against the Constitution?
[58:28.860 --> 58:31.020] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[58:31.020 --> 58:32.260] rule of our radio.
[58:33.340 --> 58:36.220] I've got the phone lines off for the moment.
[58:36.220 --> 58:37.580] We'll turn them on a little bit later.
[58:37.580 --> 58:40.420] So anybody who's waiting to call,
[58:40.420 --> 58:41.620] we'll get to you.
[58:41.620 --> 58:44.020] Hang on, we'll be right back.
[58:50.260 --> 58:52.660] Would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.660 --> 58:54.020] in your walk with God?
[58:54.020 --> 58:57.500] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.500 --> 59:00.900] and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.900 --> 59:02.620] The New Testament recovery version
[59:02.620 --> 59:04.940] is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles
[59:04.940 --> 59:06.100] available today.
[59:06.100 --> 59:07.700] It's an accurate translation
[59:07.700 --> 59:09.780] and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.780 --> 59:11.340] that will help you to know God
[59:11.340 --> 59:13.420] and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.420 --> 59:15.580] The free books are a three volume set
[59:15.580 --> 59:18.380] called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.380 --> 59:21.380] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.380 --> 59:24.220] clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.220 --> 59:27.860] growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.860 --> 59:30.780] To order your free New Testament recovery version
[59:30.780 --> 59:33.820] and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.820 --> 59:38.820] call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.500 --> 59:45.500] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.900 --> 59:55.220] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:55.220 --> 59:58.220] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments
[59:58.220 --> 59:59.500] of our constitution.
[59:59.500 --> 01:00:01.260] They guarantee the specific freedoms
[01:00:01.260 --> 01:00:02.900] Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:02.900 --> 01:00:04.620] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:04.620 --> 01:00:05.860] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:00:05.860 --> 01:00:07.940] and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:00:07.940 --> 01:00:10.740] to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:10.740 --> 01:00:12.700] Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:12.700 --> 01:00:14.580] When you give up data about yourself,
[01:00:14.580 --> 01:00:16.300] you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:16.300 --> 01:00:18.100] And once your privacy is gone,
[01:00:18.100 --> 01:00:19.580] you'll find your freedom.
[01:00:19.580 --> 01:00:21.500] And if you give up data about yourself,
[01:00:21.500 --> 01:00:23.180] you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:23.180 --> 01:00:25.980] When your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[01:00:25.980 --> 01:00:27.620] will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.620 --> 01:00:30.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[01:00:30.500 --> 01:00:32.860] and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.860 --> 01:00:35.380] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.380 --> 01:00:36.740] This public service announcement
[01:00:36.740 --> 01:00:38.940] is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:00:38.940 --> 01:00:40.820] the private search engine alternative
[01:00:40.820 --> 01:00:42.940] to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:00:42.940 --> 01:00:45.180] Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.340 --> 01:00:49.020] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:49.020 --> 01:00:52.140] They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.140 --> 01:00:53.820] He announces, I'm with the military
[01:00:53.820 --> 01:00:55.260] and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.260 --> 01:00:57.980] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed
[01:00:57.980 --> 01:01:01.060] reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.060 --> 01:01:03.460] It protects us from being forced to share our homes
[01:01:03.460 --> 01:01:05.300] with soldiers, a common demand
[01:01:05.300 --> 01:01:07.220] in the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.220 --> 01:01:09.660] Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[01:01:09.660 --> 01:01:11.220] So if you answer a knock at your door
[01:01:11.220 --> 01:01:13.380] and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:13.380 --> 01:01:15.660] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights
[01:01:15.660 --> 01:01:17.700] and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.700 --> 01:01:18.820] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.820 --> 01:01:22.460] You can find more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.460 --> 01:01:34.820] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments
[01:01:34.820 --> 01:01:36.180] of our Constitution.
[01:01:36.180 --> 01:01:37.940] They guarantee the specific freedoms
[01:01:37.940 --> 01:01:39.580] Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.580 --> 01:01:41.300] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:41.300 --> 01:01:42.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:01:42.500 --> 01:01:44.580] and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:01:44.580 --> 01:01:47.580] to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.580 --> 01:01:49.220] Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.220 --> 01:01:51.100] When you give up data about yourself,
[01:01:51.100 --> 01:01:52.820] you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.820 --> 01:01:54.620] And once your privacy is gone,
[01:01:54.620 --> 01:01:57.620] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.620 --> 01:02:00.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[01:02:00.500 --> 01:02:02.860] and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.860 --> 01:02:05.380] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.380 --> 01:02:06.740] This public service announcement
[01:02:06.740 --> 01:02:08.940] is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.940 --> 01:02:10.820] the private search engine alternative
[01:02:10.820 --> 01:02:12.940] to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:02:12.940 --> 01:02:15.220] Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:15.220 --> 01:02:18.300] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars,
[01:02:18.300 --> 01:02:21.020] a magnifying glass or a pair of X-ray goggles.
[01:02:21.020 --> 01:02:23.380] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment
[01:02:23.380 --> 01:02:24.820] guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:24.820 --> 01:02:26.900] from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:26.900 --> 01:02:30.180] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:30.180 --> 01:02:31.940] Unfortunately, the government is trampling
[01:02:31.940 --> 01:02:34.460] our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:02:34.460 --> 01:02:37.260] Case in point, TSA airport scanners
[01:02:37.260 --> 01:02:38.980] that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:38.980 --> 01:02:41.540] When government employees demand a peep at your privates
[01:02:41.540 --> 01:02:44.860] without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the alarm.
[01:02:44.860 --> 01:02:47.140] Sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.140 --> 01:02:48.900] Join me in asking our representatives
[01:02:48.900 --> 01:02:50.500] to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:50.500 --> 01:02:54.180] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:54.180 --> 01:02:55.340] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.340 --> 01:02:58.420] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:02:58.420 --> 01:03:12.500] It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:12.500 --> 01:03:19.820] I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly.
[01:03:19.820 --> 01:03:28.620] These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:28.620 --> 01:03:31.940] I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:31.940 --> 01:03:35.340] Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:35.340 --> 01:03:38.580] I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:38.580 --> 01:03:42.100] Cause the plan's wicked and the logic shoddy.
[01:03:42.100 --> 01:03:45.540] Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body.
[01:03:45.540 --> 01:03:48.860] I won't pay for the boys with my money.
[01:03:48.860 --> 01:03:53.060] Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:03:53.060 --> 01:03:56.460] The whole agenda smells funny.
[01:03:56.460 --> 01:04:03.020] I wanna fight in a war of my own.
[01:04:03.020 --> 01:04:09.980] As one would speak, let fact set the tone.
[01:04:09.980 --> 01:04:16.340] I wanna pay for a war of my own.
[01:04:16.340 --> 01:04:23.460] They live in glass houses so I can watch them grow old.
[01:04:23.460 --> 01:04:26.380] I wanna fight in a war I can win.
[01:04:26.380 --> 01:04:30.020] I can never win the one that did have me in.
[01:04:30.020 --> 01:04:33.660] That one I lose on before it begins.
[01:04:33.660 --> 01:04:36.780] I wanna pay for a war I can win.
[01:04:36.780 --> 01:04:43.740] When I'm fighting in my own war.
[01:04:43.740 --> 01:04:50.540] It's such a peaceful feeling.
[01:04:50.540 --> 01:04:57.340] When I'm playing for my own war.
[01:04:57.340 --> 01:05:03.820] I take time for the healing.
[01:05:03.820 --> 01:05:06.260] Okay, we are back.
[01:05:06.260 --> 01:05:09.660] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio.
[01:05:09.660 --> 01:05:13.700] On this Friday, the 10th day of February.
[01:05:13.700 --> 01:05:23.660] 2023, then you noticed Brett, you didn't have to remind me to do that.
[01:05:23.660 --> 01:05:24.660] Mark that down.
[01:05:24.660 --> 01:05:26.220] That could be the first time.
[01:05:26.220 --> 01:05:32.980] Okay, we always give the time and the date and stuff on the top of the hour.
[01:05:32.980 --> 01:05:36.540] That's so people listening to our archives.
[01:05:36.540 --> 01:05:41.780] For everybody who's new to listening, we do have archives that are, they're all up to
[01:05:41.780 --> 01:05:45.220] date and they will be up very shortly.
[01:05:45.220 --> 01:05:47.540] It's like tomorrow or the next day.
[01:05:47.540 --> 01:05:52.320] So if you, we are obviously recording this and the archives are all free.
[01:05:52.320 --> 01:05:59.980] You can go to Logos Radio Network and find the archive and listen to it.
[01:05:59.980 --> 01:06:08.740] So I wanna go back to Amanda and I was listening to this and the question that kept coming
[01:06:08.740 --> 01:06:12.980] into my mind was remedy.
[01:06:12.980 --> 01:06:17.940] You're demonstrating that we have problems in Canada.
[01:06:17.940 --> 01:06:20.220] What is our path to remedy?
[01:06:20.220 --> 01:06:28.180] Okay, well, I'm gonna take a moment just to quickly lay a very brief explanation of what's
[01:06:28.180 --> 01:06:31.860] going on from the perspective of Ontario.
[01:06:31.860 --> 01:06:36.020] So in Ontario, it's not 100% as bad as it seems.
[01:06:36.020 --> 01:06:41.980] We have courts that are constitutionally bound and they are the superior courts and the supreme
[01:06:41.980 --> 01:06:49.420] courts, but we have a court in our province called the Ontario Court of Justice, which
[01:06:49.420 --> 01:06:55.460] depending on who is sitting on the bench will determine if it's superior or an inferior
[01:06:55.460 --> 01:06:59.240] court and they actually call it an inferior court.
[01:06:59.240 --> 01:07:04.360] So the inferior court is created when you have a justice of the peace because the justice
[01:07:04.360 --> 01:07:07.740] of the peace is not constitutionally bound.
[01:07:07.740 --> 01:07:15.260] They are not required to be eligible, sorry, let me step back.
[01:07:15.260 --> 01:07:22.460] To be a judge, you have to be eligible pursuant to section three of the Judges Act.
[01:07:22.460 --> 01:07:29.620] To be a judge, you have to be bound into an agreement with the Minister of Justice under
[01:07:29.620 --> 01:07:37.340] section 151.1 of our Courts of Justice Act and once you meet these two standards to be
[01:07:37.340 --> 01:07:43.980] a judge, you then have to swear an oath to act faithfully and partially in the execution
[01:07:43.980 --> 01:07:48.740] of your duties under section 80 of the Courts of Justice Act.
[01:07:48.740 --> 01:07:54.500] A justice of the peace doesn't require any of that and as a result, the justice of the
[01:07:54.500 --> 01:08:01.020] peace is not technically constitutionally bound and in absence of them being constitutionally
[01:08:01.020 --> 01:08:04.660] bound, you do not establish a court of inherent jurisdiction.
[01:08:04.660 --> 01:08:15.020] Okay, in the US, an inferior court judge is a judge that does not necessarily have to
[01:08:15.020 --> 01:08:21.380] be a lawyer and that would be a municipal court or a justice of the peace court.
[01:08:21.380 --> 01:08:26.860] Is that included in the definition of inferior court in Canada?
[01:08:26.860 --> 01:08:34.180] So it would be the exact same and then from there, it drops down further to tribunals.
[01:08:34.180 --> 01:08:43.100] Once again, these people do not require any knowledge or skill in law.
[01:08:43.100 --> 01:08:48.460] Are these at a lower level than the justices of the peace?
[01:08:48.460 --> 01:08:50.140] Yep.
[01:08:50.140 --> 01:09:02.540] So in the United States, inferior court judges only hear classy misdemeanors or crimes punishable
[01:09:02.540 --> 01:09:03.980] by fine only.
[01:09:03.980 --> 01:09:07.860] Is that similar in Canada?
[01:09:07.860 --> 01:09:08.860] Yes it is.
[01:09:08.860 --> 01:09:18.580] However, it is inconsistent with section 96 of the Constitution Act of 1867.
[01:09:18.580 --> 01:09:23.020] Okay, inconsistent how?
[01:09:23.020 --> 01:09:31.580] Because under section 96 of the Constitution Act of 1867, all courts and tribunals are
[01:09:31.580 --> 01:09:41.340] to have judges and I found a case law called McMillan Bloedel Limited versus Simpson 1995
[01:09:41.340 --> 01:09:47.220] that acknowledges that in fact, the Supreme Court of Canada acknowledged that they have
[01:09:47.220 --> 01:09:53.340] been making statute that is inconsistent with section 96 and in absence of a constitutional
[01:09:53.340 --> 01:10:01.620] amendment, I can't remember the exact wording, but essentially they're acknowledging that's
[01:10:01.620 --> 01:10:02.620] happening.
[01:10:02.620 --> 01:10:08.460] So it's legal but not lawful and nobody has challenged it yet.
[01:10:08.460 --> 01:10:12.940] So it's one of the remedies I'm doing right now and I'm challenging it, but I'm not taking
[01:10:12.940 --> 01:10:15.500] it to the court initially.
[01:10:15.500 --> 01:10:23.620] What I've done is I've established my argument constitutionally and I served it to my member
[01:10:23.620 --> 01:10:27.980] of provincial parliament, which would be the equivalent of your congressman.
[01:10:27.980 --> 01:10:34.820] In addition, I sent it to our attorney general of Ontario in right of Ontario.
[01:10:34.820 --> 01:10:41.100] I also sent it to the minister of justice and attorney general of Canada and I sent
[01:10:41.100 --> 01:10:43.220] it to his majesty, the king.
[01:10:43.220 --> 01:10:47.460] Now I know it's not going to go overseas, that's not the point.
[01:10:47.460 --> 01:10:54.660] The point what people don't understand in Canada is that the character, the monarch
[01:10:54.660 --> 01:11:02.140] character is considered to be the protector and preserver of the customs and common law
[01:11:02.140 --> 01:11:09.660] of Canada and like a judge, if you don't bring the issue before the judge, the judge can't
[01:11:09.660 --> 01:11:10.660] act.
[01:11:10.660 --> 01:11:17.980] So in ceremony, you have to, if you believe that your common law rights as set out in
[01:11:17.980 --> 01:11:23.340] the constitution are being violated, if you don't bring it to the attention of the king,
[01:11:23.340 --> 01:11:26.060] the king can't fix it.
[01:11:26.060 --> 01:11:30.220] So the king gets added to it.
[01:11:30.220 --> 01:11:34.820] And that leads to a question I was going to ask.
[01:11:34.820 --> 01:11:42.700] These officials to whom you are sending these documents, do your documents invoke any specific
[01:11:42.700 --> 01:11:46.700] duty on their part?
[01:11:46.700 --> 01:11:52.380] So when I do these documents and I'm not, and I'm just going to talk it through because
[01:11:52.380 --> 01:11:57.060] I'm not sure I quite understand the question, but I think I do.
[01:11:57.060 --> 01:11:59.700] What I do is I literally start from the beginning.
[01:11:59.700 --> 01:12:07.020] I determine where the character is created and established or whether or in some circumstances
[01:12:07.020 --> 01:12:14.740] recognize and continues, then I determine what topic are we talking about?
[01:12:14.740 --> 01:12:16.220] What is the subject we're talking about?
[01:12:16.220 --> 01:12:20.140] And I'm going to use municipalities as an example.
[01:12:20.140 --> 01:12:26.700] So if you go, when you go through our constitution, the class of subjects, the distribution of
[01:12:26.700 --> 01:12:34.940] powers is established under class of subjects under part six, and it'll tell you what subjects
[01:12:34.940 --> 01:12:40.880] the parliament of Canada can create ministries and statutes for.
[01:12:40.880 --> 01:12:50.100] And it'll tell you what subjects the provinces can create ministries and statutes for.
[01:12:50.100 --> 01:12:51.760] So I will start from that.
[01:12:51.760 --> 01:12:58.140] I will figure out whether or not the ministry even has the authority to exist because I've
[01:12:58.140 --> 01:13:02.880] discovered we have ministries in Canada that don't have authority to exist, which would
[01:13:02.880 --> 01:13:07.060] explain a lot because those are the ministries that are coming after us with this digital
[01:13:07.060 --> 01:13:10.740] ID stuff.
[01:13:10.740 --> 01:13:18.580] So then from there, I would work through the statutes under those ministries to determine
[01:13:18.580 --> 01:13:22.780] who's in charge and then work my way down from there.
[01:13:22.780 --> 01:13:28.220] And once I've determined that, I then point out what they're allowed to do, what they
[01:13:28.220 --> 01:13:35.580] are doing and how that what they're doing exceeds their authority and or is inconsistent
[01:13:35.580 --> 01:13:38.940] to what the constitution allows.
[01:13:38.940 --> 01:13:41.740] There was one more thing I was looking for.
[01:13:41.740 --> 01:13:42.900] Okay.
[01:13:42.900 --> 01:13:53.580] I make it a point that when I ask a public official to do something, oh, not that, that
[01:13:53.580 --> 01:14:00.340] I only ask them to do what the law commands them to do.
[01:14:00.340 --> 01:14:08.460] So for instance, if I ask a magistrate in the state of Texas to if I give a magistrate
[01:14:08.460 --> 01:14:14.980] notice of crime in the form of a criminal complaint, he is commanded to issue a warrant.
[01:14:14.980 --> 01:14:15.980] Okay.
[01:14:15.980 --> 01:14:21.140] Well, I think if he doesn't, I don't care why he didn't.
[01:14:21.140 --> 01:14:22.340] I'm going to hammer him for it.
[01:14:22.340 --> 01:14:28.700] So when you're sending letters to these different departments, what duty do they have to respond
[01:14:28.700 --> 01:14:30.780] or do they have a duty?
[01:14:30.780 --> 01:14:40.580] Well, the notice of opportunity to cure defect for section 39 subsection 2, which is the
[01:14:40.580 --> 01:14:46.620] rule that allows a justice of the peace to preside over the inferior court of the Ontario
[01:14:46.620 --> 01:14:57.980] Court of Justice, I demanded that either my member of provincial parliament or the attorney
[01:14:57.980 --> 01:15:05.060] general of Ontario draft and submit a bill into the legislature to revoke that rule.
[01:15:05.060 --> 01:15:07.540] And I gave them a deadline.
[01:15:07.540 --> 01:15:14.960] And I've informed them that if they don't meet the deadline, that, you know, further
[01:15:14.960 --> 01:15:17.220] action may be taken.
[01:15:17.220 --> 01:15:21.500] Now there's a couple of actions that I've actually kind of thought up that I'm going
[01:15:21.500 --> 01:15:23.340] to talk about in a second.
[01:15:23.340 --> 01:15:29.900] In addition to that, I put in an additional clause, take notice, letting the person who's
[01:15:29.900 --> 01:15:36.220] acting in the official character know that if the official character does not do the
[01:15:36.220 --> 01:15:41.620] job that they're supposed to do and thereby acting good faith, that the person will be
[01:15:41.620 --> 01:15:47.860] held severally and jointly liable for any actions of bad faith from the moment they've
[01:15:47.860 --> 01:15:50.780] been received this notice going forward.
[01:15:50.780 --> 01:15:57.020] Well, that sounds very interesting and commanding.
[01:15:57.020 --> 01:16:04.260] Is there specific statutory or constitutional law that gives you standing to make those
[01:16:04.260 --> 01:16:05.260] claims?
[01:16:05.260 --> 01:16:13.100] Well, that comes from the fact that we, the people in Canada, like the United States,
[01:16:13.100 --> 01:16:14.100] they represent us.
[01:16:14.100 --> 01:16:17.380] They have a fiduciary duty to us because we elect them.
[01:16:17.380 --> 01:16:23.420] The House of Commons, the House of the Legislative Assembly of the province are our houses created
[01:16:23.420 --> 01:16:28.260] of the people, by the people and for the people, just like you guys are in the States.
[01:16:28.260 --> 01:16:31.220] That is the very, that's very much the same.
[01:16:31.220 --> 01:16:32.220] Okay.
[01:16:32.220 --> 01:16:35.500] That sounds like our Republic.
[01:16:35.500 --> 01:16:41.300] We are citizens in a Republic and that makes us the highest rung on the ladder.
[01:16:41.300 --> 01:16:42.300] Hang on.
[01:16:42.300 --> 01:16:52.220] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, I'll turn on the phones in probably
[01:16:52.220 --> 01:16:54.820] the next, at the end of the next segment.
[01:16:54.820 --> 01:17:00.380] So if you have a question or comment, hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.380 --> 01:17:04.940] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.940 --> 01:17:09.180] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:17:09.180 --> 01:17:13.460] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:17:13.460 --> 01:17:14.820] can win too.
[01:17:14.820 --> 01:17:19.300] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.300 --> 01:17:25.060] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:25.060 --> 01:17:29.700] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.700 --> 01:17:33.900] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.900 --> 01:17:39.020] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.020 --> 01:17:40.940] Financial consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.940 --> 01:17:46.700] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:17:46.700 --> 01:17:49.700] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.700 --> 01:17:58.700] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.700 --> 01:18:00.420] collectors now.
[01:18:00.420 --> 01:18:01.420] I love logos.
[01:18:01.420 --> 01:18:04.780] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.780 --> 01:18:07.580] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.580 --> 01:18:08.820] I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.820 --> 01:18:13.500] I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.500 --> 01:18:17.260] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[01:18:17.260 --> 01:18:20.620] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.620 --> 01:18:21.980] How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.980 --> 01:18:24.180] Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.180 --> 01:18:27.020] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:27.020 --> 01:18:29.540] You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.540 --> 01:18:31.660] First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.660 --> 01:18:38.020] Now go to logosradio.network.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.020 --> 01:18:43.700] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.700 --> 01:18:44.700] Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.700 --> 01:18:45.700] No.
[01:18:45.700 --> 01:18:47.260] Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.260 --> 01:18:48.260] No.
[01:18:48.260 --> 01:18:49.260] Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.260 --> 01:18:50.260] No.
[01:18:50.260 --> 01:18:51.260] I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.260 --> 01:18:52.260] Wow.
[01:18:52.260 --> 01:18:54.500] Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.500 --> 01:18:55.500] This is perfect.
[01:18:55.500 --> 01:18:56.500] Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.500 --> 01:18:57.500] We are welcome.
[01:18:57.500 --> 01:18:58.500] Happy holidays, logos.
[01:18:58.500 --> 01:19:08.140] Listen, the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:08.140 --> 01:19:36.700] Ain't gonna blind me, don't bore me, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.700 --> 01:19:45.540] I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans, you put the beer in my pocket, took the money
[01:19:45.540 --> 01:19:55.540] from my hands, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:55.540 --> 01:20:16.540] I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans, you put the beer in my pocket, took the money
[01:20:16.540 --> 01:20:21.540] from my hands, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:21.540 --> 01:20:27.540] Back then you had room to move, but now you're feeling the crush, ain't gonna get me with
[01:20:27.540 --> 01:20:28.540] that same old sucker punch.
[01:20:28.540 --> 01:20:58.460] Well, ain't gonna please me with that same old Amazon Prime, you thought you were out
[01:20:58.460 --> 01:21:02.180] of luck, but now you got it all wrong.
[01:21:02.180 --> 01:21:08.820] It was a weak moment for me, but I had the power all along, ain't gonna please me with
[01:21:08.820 --> 01:21:09.820] that same old Amazon Prime.
[01:21:09.820 --> 01:21:36.820] Ain't gonna bore me with that same old bundle of lies, your arrogance is absurd, don't
[01:21:36.820 --> 01:21:55.820] know why you even try, I'm gonna see my sweet red public re-analyze, ain't gonna blind me
[01:21:55.820 --> 01:22:03.740] with that same old bucket of lies.
[01:22:03.740 --> 01:22:14.300] We are back, we're here with our special guest, Amanda Ridding, out of Canada.
[01:22:14.300 --> 01:22:18.180] If anybody was listening at the beginning, those little remarks I said about Canadians
[01:22:18.180 --> 01:22:21.820] and Canucks, don't pay any attention to that.
[01:22:21.820 --> 01:22:22.820] Okay.
[01:22:22.820 --> 01:22:27.700] Especially not California, that's a four-line word, right?
[01:22:27.700 --> 01:22:30.980] Okay, go ahead, Amanda.
[01:22:30.980 --> 01:22:38.180] All right, so I think where I left off is we have an issue with the inherent jurisdiction
[01:22:38.180 --> 01:22:43.980] in the courts, and what is happening in Canada right now, which is of particular concern
[01:22:43.980 --> 01:22:51.300] to Canadians, and you folks may or may not be aware of it down here in the United States,
[01:22:51.300 --> 01:22:58.340] is that they've issued out new acts of legislation, an example, something called the Reopening
[01:22:58.340 --> 01:23:07.460] of Ontario Act, which shut us down and damaged and destroyed a lot of businesses, in addition
[01:23:07.460 --> 01:23:13.420] to people being fired and whatnot, and businesses that stood up, people that went out and protested,
[01:23:13.420 --> 01:23:18.460] they started getting charged for protesting under this Reopening of Ontario Act.
[01:23:18.460 --> 01:23:23.820] They started getting charged for opening their businesses in protest in order to make a living,
[01:23:23.820 --> 01:23:29.700] in order to maintain life, liberty, security of the person, which is, by the way, Section
[01:23:29.700 --> 01:23:39.540] 1A of the Canadian Bill of Rights, just plug in there, but the point is that they created
[01:23:39.540 --> 01:23:45.700] the statute, they started sending out not police officers, but the municipal law enforcement
[01:23:45.700 --> 01:23:51.180] officers, the petty crime officers, as you guys call them, and they started sending these
[01:23:51.180 --> 01:23:57.460] people off into these kangaroo courts to have their lives destroyed.
[01:23:57.460 --> 01:24:04.260] And it's because of this that I'm determined to bring back the inherent jurisdiction of
[01:24:04.260 --> 01:24:10.580] every court and tribunal in Canada, because the issue with not having a court of inherent
[01:24:10.580 --> 01:24:17.180] jurisdiction is it becomes much more difficult for Canadians who do not know the Constitution
[01:24:17.180 --> 01:24:25.220] to establish the Canadian Bill of Rights in a court that does not have the inherent jurisdiction.
[01:24:25.220 --> 01:24:29.660] In other words, if the court's not bound constitutionally, they won't acknowledge your Canadian Bill
[01:24:29.660 --> 01:24:30.660] of Rights.
[01:24:30.660 --> 01:24:34.660] It's a really disgusting thing, actually.
[01:24:34.660 --> 01:24:41.060] Do we lose you?
[01:24:41.060 --> 01:24:42.060] No, no.
[01:24:42.060 --> 01:24:43.060] I'm sorry.
[01:24:43.060 --> 01:24:47.460] I didn't know if you guys wanted to jump in on...
[01:24:47.460 --> 01:24:48.460] Okay.
[01:24:48.460 --> 01:24:51.460] Yeah, I'm here.
[01:24:51.460 --> 01:24:57.620] We heard you, and just keep on going.
[01:24:57.620 --> 01:24:58.620] Okay.
[01:24:58.620 --> 01:24:59.620] No problem.
[01:24:59.620 --> 01:25:00.620] I'm sorry.
[01:25:00.620 --> 01:25:04.940] I just, I didn't want to go into monologue too much, so I, but I will continue.
[01:25:04.940 --> 01:25:05.940] If you...
[01:25:05.940 --> 01:25:06.940] Don't worry.
[01:25:06.940 --> 01:25:08.940] It's got a low bandwidth issue.
[01:25:08.940 --> 01:25:12.980] We'll just chalk it up to bandwidth.
[01:25:12.980 --> 01:25:17.540] If your monologue's too long, I'll just make a little sound, and you'll hear me, and then
[01:25:17.540 --> 01:25:20.340] when you stop, I'll ask a question or something.
[01:25:20.340 --> 01:25:21.340] Fair enough.
[01:25:21.340 --> 01:25:22.340] All right.
[01:25:22.340 --> 01:25:30.100] So, again, at issue here, you have protesters who are getting ticketed.
[01:25:30.100 --> 01:25:34.260] You have protesters who are peacefully protesting getting arrested.
[01:25:34.260 --> 01:25:40.340] In fact, some of them get thrown into prison for nothing more than freedom of speech, freedom
[01:25:40.340 --> 01:25:45.700] of assembly and association, freedom of the press, these things that are protected and
[01:25:45.700 --> 01:25:53.220] recognized by our Canadian Bill of Rights are being ignored by courts that are not constitutionally
[01:25:53.220 --> 01:25:54.220] bound.
[01:25:54.220 --> 01:26:01.580] Now, I do believe, and I actually know why I hate saying I do believe, because I can
[01:26:01.580 --> 01:26:06.900] prove the question is whether or not it's going to be seen, so let me rephrase it.
[01:26:06.900 --> 01:26:15.460] By all appearances, by all appearances in Canada, even in a kangaroo court, you can
[01:26:15.460 --> 01:26:21.300] establish your constitutional jurisdiction of the court, and I found it.
[01:26:21.300 --> 01:26:24.780] I found it in our Municipal Act.
[01:26:24.780 --> 01:26:30.920] So how it happens, and I'm going to speak from the Ontario perspective.
[01:26:30.920 --> 01:26:39.260] In Ontario, sorry, in the Constitution Act, under section 92, subsection 8, sets, it provides
[01:26:39.260 --> 01:26:49.260] the subject municipalities, which establishes the subject that the Ministry of Municipal
[01:26:49.260 --> 01:26:51.300] Affairs can be created.
[01:26:51.300 --> 01:26:58.140] The Ministry of Municipal Affairs created now can create the statute for municipalities,
[01:26:58.140 --> 01:27:03.020] which they created, called the Municipal Act 2001.
[01:27:03.020 --> 01:27:09.660] Our Municipal Act, by the way, has multiple provisions in it that are inconsistent with
[01:27:09.660 --> 01:27:18.820] the Constitution of Canada, and there is a rule I'm going to talk about in a second,
[01:27:18.820 --> 01:27:19.820] Randi.
[01:27:19.820 --> 01:27:24.300] Just make note of that, that forces them to conform to the Constitution.
[01:27:24.300 --> 01:27:27.500] I'll get to that in a minute.
[01:27:27.500 --> 01:27:38.420] So in the Municipal Act in Ontario, under section 4, it says, the inhabitants of a municipality
[01:27:38.420 --> 01:27:42.860] are incorporated into the municipality.
[01:27:42.860 --> 01:27:48.940] So if I am an inhabitant of a municipality, I am part of the municipality with a capital
[01:27:48.940 --> 01:27:52.420] P.
[01:27:52.420 --> 01:27:56.060] And did you want to say something, Brett?
[01:27:56.060 --> 01:28:01.740] You can talk about whatever you'd like.
[01:28:01.740 --> 01:28:04.340] But hear me out, hear me out, because there's more.
[01:28:04.340 --> 01:28:10.700] So if I'm incorporated as an inhabitant into my municipality, I am part, with a capital
[01:28:10.700 --> 01:28:15.020] P, because I'm sovereign, of the municipality.
[01:28:15.020 --> 01:28:22.340] And then on section 9, it says a municipality, now, I don't know if you guys have the same
[01:28:22.340 --> 01:28:28.340] sort of thing in your law down here, but the capitals on mundane words like municipality
[01:28:28.340 --> 01:28:29.340] matter.
[01:28:29.340 --> 01:28:35.580] So when it's lowercase, it could mean both public and private, but when it's capitalized,
[01:28:35.580 --> 01:28:40.700] then it would be the person, the natural person who's sovereign.
[01:28:40.700 --> 01:28:41.700] Same thing with judges.
[01:28:41.700 --> 01:28:46.460] So if a judge is a little J, it means they're not constitutionally bound, and if it's a
[01:28:46.460 --> 01:28:50.580] judge with a big J, they're constitutionally bound, just to give you some idea of how our
[01:28:50.580 --> 01:28:58.440] legislation is written, and it's taken some study to pick up on that nuance, but I have.
[01:28:58.440 --> 01:29:05.100] So if I'm part capital P of the municipality, and under section 9, a municipality has all
[01:29:05.100 --> 01:29:10.780] the rights, powers, privileges of a natural person, I've now just established myself
[01:29:10.780 --> 01:29:14.500] under constitutional jurisdiction with the rights, powers, and privileges of a natural
[01:29:14.500 --> 01:29:18.980] person, and now I can use my Canadian Bill of Rights, and they can go fornicate themselves
[01:29:18.980 --> 01:29:21.580] with that.
[01:29:21.580 --> 01:29:24.180] Sorry I was trying to be polite about it.
[01:29:24.180 --> 01:29:25.180] That was great.
[01:29:25.180 --> 01:29:35.140] Well, okay, we won't go to the fact that I used to be an apprentice of Bader.
[01:29:35.140 --> 01:29:36.140] Okay.
[01:29:36.140 --> 01:29:42.760] Hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors.
[01:29:42.760 --> 01:29:51.940] I think after the next segment, I'll turn the phones off, we've still got some more
[01:29:51.940 --> 01:29:52.940] content.
[01:29:52.940 --> 01:29:53.940] Hang on.
[01:29:53.940 --> 01:29:54.940] Okay.
[01:29:54.940 --> 01:30:01.940] We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.940 --> 01:30:05.660] Sorry soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.660 --> 01:30:10.300] A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid
[01:30:10.300 --> 01:30:11.300] the stuff.
[01:30:11.300 --> 01:30:15.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly
[01:30:15.300 --> 01:30:17.420] skinny sodas.
[01:30:17.420 --> 01:30:18.980] Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.980 --> 01:30:22.620] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.620 --> 01:30:27.380] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.380 --> 01:30:32.420] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.420 --> 01:30:35.140] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.140 --> 01:30:39.420] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[01:30:39.420 --> 01:30:42.940] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.940 --> 01:30:46.460] Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:46.460 --> 01:30:50.220] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:50.220 --> 01:30:51.220] Wrong.
[01:30:51.220 --> 01:30:55.940] Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:55.940 --> 01:31:01.140] They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more
[01:31:01.140 --> 01:31:02.900] than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.900 --> 01:31:07.660] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars,
[01:31:07.660 --> 01:31:09.900] don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:09.900 --> 01:31:14.380] Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger
[01:31:14.380 --> 01:31:15.900] overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.900 --> 01:31:20.700] So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds,
[01:31:20.700 --> 01:31:23.780] avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.780 --> 01:31:25.900] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.900 --> 01:31:30.660] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.660 --> 01:31:36.020] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.020 --> 01:31:38.220] The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.220 --> 01:31:42.900] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.900 --> 01:31:47.180] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.180 --> 01:31:48.540] first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.540 --> 01:31:49.900] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.900 --> 01:31:50.900] I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.900 --> 01:31:52.380] I'm a New York City correction office.
[01:31:52.380 --> 01:31:53.380] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.380 --> 01:31:54.980] I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.980 --> 01:31:57.620] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.620 --> 01:31:59.620] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:31:59.620 --> 01:32:05.980] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar in today's America
[01:32:05.980 --> 01:32:09.100] where we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have
[01:32:09.100 --> 01:32:12.780] a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.780 --> 01:32:16.020] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.020 --> 01:32:19.740] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:19.740 --> 01:32:23.900] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:23.900 --> 01:32:25.260] our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.260 --> 01:32:29.260] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:29.260 --> 01:32:33.020] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.020 --> 01:32:35.140] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.140 --> 01:32:39.460] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.460 --> 01:32:40.460] ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.460 --> 01:32:43.900] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:43.900 --> 01:32:48.540] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:48.540 --> 01:32:50.860] documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.860 --> 01:32:54.820] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.820 --> 01:33:03.260] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:03.260 --> 01:33:04.260] Looking for some truth?
[01:33:04.260 --> 01:33:05.260] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:35.260 --> 01:33:47.260] The wicked come with temptations They're trying to buy the whole place
[01:33:47.260 --> 01:33:58.260] They want to force the nation Because they're falling from grace
[01:33:58.260 --> 01:34:07.260] I will not drink from that cup I just can't act that way
[01:34:07.260 --> 01:34:18.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They won't be the slaves come what may
[01:34:18.260 --> 01:34:35.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They won't be the slaves come what may
[01:34:35.260 --> 01:34:52.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They won't be the slaves come what may
[01:34:52.260 --> 01:35:03.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They won't be the slaves come what may
[01:35:03.260 --> 01:35:12.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They got this problem they're dreaming of
[01:35:12.260 --> 01:35:22.260] They got this problem they're dreaming of They got this problem they're dreaming of
[01:35:22.260 --> 01:35:29.300] So, a lot of people in Canada, I'm just going to retrace my steps a little bit here, I told
[01:35:29.300 --> 01:35:30.860] you we have two constitutions.
[01:35:30.860 --> 01:35:36.220] The second constitution is known as the Constitution Act of 1982.
[01:35:36.220 --> 01:35:40.660] It contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which I discourage any Canadian
[01:35:40.660 --> 01:35:48.020] from ever using, however, it has Section 52, Subsection 1.
[01:35:48.020 --> 01:35:55.940] Section 52, Subsection 1 states that the Constitution is the supreme law of Canada and any law that
[01:35:55.940 --> 01:36:03.500] is inconsistent with the Constitution is to the extent of the inconsistency of no force
[01:36:03.500 --> 01:36:04.500] or effect.
[01:36:04.500 --> 01:36:11.600] So, if you establish, the way I understand that clause, if you establish an inconsistency
[01:36:11.600 --> 01:36:17.300] with any statute, including the Municipal Act, then you need to bring it forward.
[01:36:17.300 --> 01:36:22.060] And I personally think we should start in our legislatures, and I will expand on that
[01:36:22.060 --> 01:36:29.300] if you ask me to, before we take it to the courts, but essentially we bring it forth,
[01:36:29.300 --> 01:36:34.700] we present our argument, we demonstrate how it is inconsistent, and then we slap Section
[01:36:34.700 --> 01:36:39.140] 52, Subsection 1 on them and let them know that anything that is inconsistent with the
[01:36:39.140 --> 01:36:46.300] Constitution is to the extent of that inconsistency, no force or effect, therefore, under the spirit
[01:36:46.300 --> 01:36:53.700] and nature of contract law, it is void or avoidable, so get to it and fix it.
[01:36:53.700 --> 01:37:04.820] Do you have tools available to force them to get to it, or must you simply ask them?
[01:37:04.820 --> 01:37:06.980] No, I believe we have tools.
[01:37:06.980 --> 01:37:13.860] Now, I mentioned, I think we should start in the legislatures, because to me, it's,
[01:37:13.860 --> 01:37:20.540] I think it, for a multitude of reasons, in part because it helps to build the case, Randy.
[01:37:20.540 --> 01:37:25.820] If you go to the legislatures, if you stop and look at, and I believe it's the same in
[01:37:25.820 --> 01:37:29.940] the United States, if you stop and you think about it for one moment, the legislatures
[01:37:29.940 --> 01:37:36.220] create law and the courts make the decisions based on issues at law.
[01:37:36.220 --> 01:37:43.380] So if the people, if the legislatures create law and the law is technically legal but not
[01:37:43.380 --> 01:37:49.540] lawful, because it is inconsistent to the Constitution, take it back to them and say,
[01:37:49.540 --> 01:37:56.340] yo, this section here, it doesn't work, it's inconsistent, so fix it.
[01:37:56.340 --> 01:38:00.700] With the Notice of Opportunity to Cure Defect going out to the appropriate constitutional
[01:38:00.700 --> 01:38:07.740] characters, and I say appropriate constitutional characters, in addition to your member of
[01:38:07.740 --> 01:38:15.380] parliament or member of provincial parliament, or for that matter, your counsel, then you
[01:38:15.380 --> 01:38:17.500] are establishing your case.
[01:38:17.500 --> 01:38:22.700] And if you write it correctly, your Notice of Opportunity to Cure Defect will essentially
[01:38:22.700 --> 01:38:26.340] be your rough draft of the case that may come down the road.
[01:38:26.340 --> 01:38:32.500] Now, going forward, if they don't respond and they don't react, you can take it to
[01:38:32.500 --> 01:38:37.620] the court and you can take it to the court under a judicial review.
[01:38:37.620 --> 01:38:43.180] And ask the court to decide whether or not the law is inconsistent and whether or not
[01:38:43.180 --> 01:38:45.500] they will order the legislature.
[01:38:45.500 --> 01:38:51.140] Now, that part of it I'm still working through, but then I had another idea that popped into
[01:38:51.140 --> 01:38:57.720] my head, and that is the fact that our attorney generals and our minister of justice, they're
[01:38:57.720 --> 01:39:00.660] all officers of the court.
[01:39:00.660 --> 01:39:02.780] They're all officers of the court.
[01:39:02.780 --> 01:39:09.540] By law, they have to be officers of the court because they're the ones that preside over
[01:39:09.540 --> 01:39:17.900] the legislation that is drafted before it gets presented to the House for debate and
[01:39:17.900 --> 01:39:22.060] then voting.
[01:39:22.060 --> 01:39:30.380] So it occurred to me, if you're notifying these officers of the court that this is inconsistent
[01:39:30.380 --> 01:39:36.820] and you then make sure you put a take notice clause as of this moment forward, you're now
[01:39:36.820 --> 01:39:37.820] made aware of it.
[01:39:37.820 --> 01:39:44.260] And if you do not act in good faith and fix it, then your acts going forward will be deemed
[01:39:44.260 --> 01:39:46.580] to be acts of bad faith.
[01:39:46.580 --> 01:39:53.020] Not only are you establishing, from my perspective, a case for the courts, but you're also establishing,
[01:39:53.020 --> 01:39:58.460] from my perspective, a bar grievance against these officers in the court.
[01:39:58.460 --> 01:40:06.380] And I'm seriously contemplating putting a bar grievance against Doug Downey, the attorney
[01:40:06.380 --> 01:40:12.940] general of Ontario and right of Ontario for acts of bad faith if he doesn't conform and
[01:40:12.940 --> 01:40:22.180] start following the rule of law because Canada does recognize the rule of law.
[01:40:22.180 --> 01:40:29.060] The United States is supposed to, but they don't.
[01:40:29.060 --> 01:40:36.980] And what you're speaking to sounds very consistent with U.S. law, except we do it in a somewhat
[01:40:36.980 --> 01:40:40.780] different way.
[01:40:40.780 --> 01:40:42.980] We make constitutional challenges.
[01:40:42.980 --> 01:40:48.100] And when you make a constitutional challenge, you're required to give notice to the state
[01:40:48.100 --> 01:40:53.100] attorney general or to the federal attorney general, depending on which constitution you're
[01:40:53.100 --> 01:40:57.260] challenging so that they can come in and argue their issues.
[01:40:57.260 --> 01:41:01.380] And you're speaking to the kinds of things we'd like to go to.
[01:41:01.380 --> 01:41:04.600] So I should correct myself because you are correct.
[01:41:04.600 --> 01:41:09.980] When I say a judicial review, it would be a judicial review constitutionally.
[01:41:09.980 --> 01:41:15.300] It would have to go to His Majesty the King, the Minister of Justice, the attorney and
[01:41:15.300 --> 01:41:19.700] attorney general of Canada, and the attorney general of the province of the province you're
[01:41:19.700 --> 01:41:20.700] in.
[01:41:20.700 --> 01:41:24.620] It has to go to both attorney generals whenever you're doing a constitutional challenge.
[01:41:24.620 --> 01:41:27.900] So in that, yes, it would be the same.
[01:41:27.900 --> 01:41:34.220] But then when you stop and think about it, it is universal, it is the theory and science
[01:41:34.220 --> 01:41:35.220] of law.
[01:41:35.220 --> 01:41:40.660] The theory aspect of it is like physics, it's theoretical, it cannot be proven, but the
[01:41:40.660 --> 01:41:44.440] science aspect of it is like physics as well.
[01:41:44.440 --> 01:41:51.100] That is irrefutable, universally accepted and irrefutable is universal across the world.
[01:41:51.100 --> 01:41:56.460] The only differences that I typically see between your law and our law, other than the
[01:41:56.460 --> 01:42:01.900] minor differences of our constitutions, is that you folks will use different words and
[01:42:01.900 --> 01:42:07.420] different terms that we will use, but the formulas are still the same.
[01:42:07.420 --> 01:42:08.420] Yes.
[01:42:08.420 --> 01:42:13.100] I built a questionnaire that would emulate a lawyer.
[01:42:13.100 --> 01:42:19.940] I was talking to someone in England about it, and he said, well, you have a questionnaire
[01:42:19.940 --> 01:42:28.880] for American law, but that's not the same as English law.
[01:42:28.880 --> 01:42:37.700] My comment was an illegal left turn is an illegal left turn, no matter where you do
[01:42:37.700 --> 01:42:39.700] it.
[01:42:39.700 --> 01:42:42.900] Human beings are human beings.
[01:42:42.900 --> 01:42:48.900] Human beings have flaws and weaknesses, and every country on the planet has put together
[01:42:48.900 --> 01:42:53.260] a set of laws to address those human weakness and frailties.
[01:42:53.260 --> 01:42:56.820] They're all the same.
[01:42:56.820 --> 01:43:03.860] The only real differences are the names that you use for the laws and the laws that are
[01:43:03.860 --> 01:43:06.420] strictly political.
[01:43:06.420 --> 01:43:07.420] When I do this show…
[01:43:07.420 --> 01:43:12.460] Yes, and that's jurisprudence, the theory and science of law.
[01:43:12.460 --> 01:43:15.340] When I do this show, people call in and say, oh, is this legal?
[01:43:15.340 --> 01:43:16.340] Is that legal?
[01:43:16.340 --> 01:43:23.020] The first thing I do is go back to what would a reasonable person of ordinary prudence think
[01:43:23.020 --> 01:43:24.820] the law should be.
[01:43:24.820 --> 01:43:31.100] 95% of the time, I'm going to be dead on, and if I'm not dead on, there's a problem
[01:43:31.100 --> 01:43:34.100] with the law.
[01:43:34.100 --> 01:43:35.100] So…
[01:43:35.100 --> 01:43:37.100] Well, common law is common sense, really.
[01:43:37.100 --> 01:43:38.100] Exactly.
[01:43:38.100 --> 01:43:43.020] And because they've done this so long, we should have all the remedies in there.
[01:43:43.020 --> 01:43:45.060] We just call them different things.
[01:43:45.060 --> 01:43:46.060] When I come back…
[01:43:46.060 --> 01:43:48.780] Well, I'm going to turn the phone lines on.
[01:43:48.780 --> 01:43:54.540] So when I come back, we'll have a little more talk, and then we'll start taking questions,
[01:43:54.540 --> 01:43:55.540] taking calls.
[01:43:55.540 --> 01:44:00.540] We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.540 --> 01:44:05.220] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.220 --> 01:44:06.620] of nutrition.
[01:44:06.620 --> 01:44:10.460] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all
[01:44:10.460 --> 01:44:11.460] that.
[01:44:11.460 --> 01:44:17.060] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.060 --> 01:44:23.420] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[01:44:23.420 --> 01:44:25.620] provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.620 --> 01:44:30.500] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.500 --> 01:44:31.620] we reject.
[01:44:31.620 --> 01:44:34.140] We have come to trust young Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.140 --> 01:44:39.740] We became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.740 --> 01:44:46.060] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.060 --> 01:44:47.060] quality radio.
[01:44:47.060 --> 01:44:51.660] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.660 --> 01:44:57.220] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.220 --> 01:44:58.220] increase your income.
[01:44:58.220 --> 01:44:59.220] Order now.
[01:44:59.220 --> 01:45:00.220] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:00.220 --> 01:45:11.100] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.100 --> 01:45:14.100] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.100 --> 01:45:18.820] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.820 --> 01:45:23.100] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.100 --> 01:45:28.820] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.820 --> 01:45:34.700] It was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.700 --> 01:45:39.140] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.140 --> 01:45:43.540] the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.540 --> 01:45:49.700] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.700 --> 01:45:52.100] pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.100 --> 01:45:56.500] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.500 --> 01:45:59.500] Or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.500 --> 01:46:40.500] As we saw, so shall we read The words of nutrition from so many fruits
[01:46:40.500 --> 01:46:49.500] The words get put on all of me As we saw, so shall we read
[01:46:49.500 --> 01:47:03.620] The number one pills, wrong coins, wrong flow As we saw, so shall we read
[01:47:03.620 --> 01:47:26.620] One by one, me friend tell everybody, pass on the words of our mighty, lend a helping hand,
[01:47:26.620 --> 01:47:33.460] me say as you go along, no lay come on, me say knock you down, man, chair with the
[01:47:33.460 --> 01:47:40.900] barn, if you don't plant no seed, my friend, Lord, you better have a good breed, you better
[01:47:40.900 --> 01:47:46.660] live your life up fully, because you know me, say John, I'll sleep with you.
[01:47:46.660 --> 01:48:04.660] Portions of redemption for devotions so deep, as we sow, so shall we reap, many miles to travel,
[01:48:04.660 --> 01:48:16.660] many promises to keep, as we sow, so shall we reap.
[01:48:16.660 --> 01:48:38.660] You can't enter Zion in the darkness, you must come in the light, me say as a witness,
[01:48:38.660 --> 01:48:46.660] John, John, don't sleep, me friend, John, John, therefore we do not give up.
[01:49:09.660 --> 01:49:18.660] Oh, I'm supposed to do that? Okay, call that number is 512-646-1984.
[01:49:18.660 --> 01:49:22.660] After 15 years, I actually remember the number.
[01:49:22.660 --> 01:49:32.660] Okay, so give us a call. I did want to talk about extraordinary remedies.
[01:49:32.660 --> 01:49:38.660] I've been doing this legal reform stuff for a long time, and I started out using all the standard
[01:49:38.660 --> 01:49:44.660] tools and techniques that our governments point us to.
[01:49:44.660 --> 01:49:52.660] Oh, you can do this, you can do that, you can do the other, and none of them were worth anything.
[01:49:52.660 --> 01:49:54.660] None of them got me anywhere.
[01:49:54.660 --> 01:50:01.660] So I once filed a set of criminal complaints against all the highest judges in Texas, criminal judges
[01:50:01.660 --> 01:50:06.660] at Texas, and it got booked before a grand jury.
[01:50:06.660 --> 01:50:12.660] And I thought it was because I gave them so much difficulty, and I went down to the grand jury
[01:50:12.660 --> 01:50:18.660] with a camera crew, and I bushwhacked a judge in his courtroom and dumped the complaints on him.
[01:50:18.660 --> 01:50:21.660] I just made a nuisance of myself, and I thought that was it.
[01:50:21.660 --> 01:50:25.660] Turned out that didn't have anything to do with it.
[01:50:25.660 --> 01:50:33.660] It turned out that the district attorney was a 25-year district attorney.
[01:50:33.660 --> 01:50:35.660] He was retiring.
[01:50:35.660 --> 01:50:37.660] He was a Democrat.
[01:50:37.660 --> 01:50:42.660] All nine of these judges were Republicans.
[01:50:42.660 --> 01:50:45.660] Everything is political.
[01:50:45.660 --> 01:50:52.660] You can never expect to win your case when I'm getting some banging in the background, big time.
[01:50:52.660 --> 01:50:59.660] You can never expect to win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:50:59.660 --> 01:51:02.660] To think so is naive.
[01:51:02.660 --> 01:51:08.660] You'll only win your case when you have the politics on your side, and that's what this taught me.
[01:51:08.660 --> 01:51:13.660] So I stopped, you know, I'd look at the law, you know, we are creatures of statute here,
[01:51:13.660 --> 01:51:20.660] but I'm not naive enough to think that the law are remedies unto themselves.
[01:51:20.660 --> 01:51:21.660] Everything's political.
[01:51:21.660 --> 01:51:25.660] So how do we create political pressure?
[01:51:25.660 --> 01:51:32.660] I create political pressure by going down and setting up a judge so I can hammer him.
[01:51:32.660 --> 01:51:38.660] Ask him to do something I know he's not going to want to do so I can hammer him when he doesn't do it.
[01:51:38.660 --> 01:51:43.660] What tools of that nature do you have in Canada, Amanda?
[01:51:43.660 --> 01:51:51.660] So if you're in the court defending yourself, obviously you can file motions,
[01:51:51.660 --> 01:51:57.660] and depending on what your issue is, I do suggest you do find that rule of law.
[01:51:57.660 --> 01:52:05.660] I want to speak specifically, though, to protesters because this is something that protesters should really do some research on.
[01:52:05.660 --> 01:52:13.660] If you're called before the court because you were ticketed or you were arrested for protesting,
[01:52:13.660 --> 01:52:22.660] under our Courts of Justice Act, which is a constitutional statute, there is a section, and it's Section 137.1.
[01:52:22.660 --> 01:52:25.660] I'm just going to say that again in case anyone wants to write it down.
[01:52:25.660 --> 01:52:30.660] It's Section 137.1, Courts of Justice Act, Ontario.
[01:52:30.660 --> 01:52:35.660] Again, I always speak from the Ontario perspective because that's where I live.
[01:52:35.660 --> 01:52:42.660] What is important about that section is that while there's all these things that they can potentially charge you for,
[01:52:42.660 --> 01:52:55.660] the one thing they can't charge you for is protesting when you're out there participating in assemblies or speaking out in matters of public interest.
[01:52:55.660 --> 01:53:03.660] It actually talks about having your right to express yourself in matters of public interest.
[01:53:03.660 --> 01:53:06.660] So the thought process is this.
[01:53:06.660 --> 01:53:14.660] If you're brought before a court, not only can you request a dismissal under Section 137.1, Subsection 3,
[01:53:14.660 --> 01:53:20.660] because you're protesting and you have the legal right to protest under this Act,
[01:53:20.660 --> 01:53:30.660] why aren't people turning around and then, depending on the circumstances of their case, putting on an offense?
[01:53:30.660 --> 01:53:32.660] Because the best defense is a good offense.
[01:53:32.660 --> 01:53:35.660] So why limit yourself to asking for the dismissal?
[01:53:35.660 --> 01:53:45.660] Why not turn around and ask the court to determine whether or not the Crown Attorney's conduct is malicious?
[01:53:45.660 --> 01:53:53.660] Because they're pursuing you when all the evidence, including their own words,
[01:53:53.660 --> 01:53:59.660] acknowledges you're protesting and you have a legal right to protest and the fact that they didn't immediately withdraw it.
[01:53:59.660 --> 01:54:08.660] Then you can use the rules from the Law Society of Ontario, which is the complete rules of professional conduct,
[01:54:08.660 --> 01:54:12.660] and it says it right in there, the things that they're not allowed to do.
[01:54:12.660 --> 01:54:21.660] So when they bring forth, I mean, as everyone knows, a prosecutor is supposed to review the case,
[01:54:21.660 --> 01:54:28.660] determine whether or not they can set down, like if there's enough evidence there to pursue the case before they set it down,
[01:54:28.660 --> 01:54:36.660] or whether or not they're going to set it aside or withdraw if they, you know, no chance of motion of non-suit.
[01:54:36.660 --> 01:54:45.660] But if they decide to pursue a protest charge and they know that this rule is there and they ignore that the rule is there,
[01:54:45.660 --> 01:54:49.660] then that potentially can be considered an act of malice.
[01:54:49.660 --> 01:54:54.660] And so you can literally put on an offense and say not only do I want a dismissal,
[01:54:54.660 --> 01:55:00.660] I would like the court to determine whether or not this prosecutor coming after me for these protest charges
[01:55:00.660 --> 01:55:04.660] when it's my legal right to protest under Section 137.1.
[01:55:04.660 --> 01:55:08.660] And I'd like the court to make it determine whether or not it's an act of malice.
[01:55:08.660 --> 01:55:11.660] And if you can get the court to make that determination,
[01:55:11.660 --> 01:55:16.660] your bar grievance against that crown attorney just got a whole lot easier.
[01:55:16.660 --> 01:55:19.660] Well, Amanda, you mentioned something.
[01:55:19.660 --> 01:55:28.660] In the middle of that, you added a condition that it would be a problem if they know that that rule exists.
[01:55:28.660 --> 01:55:38.660] Maybe we can consider that they should know, they know or should know, and they're guilty whether they actually know or not.
[01:55:38.660 --> 01:55:44.660] So this is where you come in with the motion to dismiss.
[01:55:44.660 --> 01:55:51.660] And if they argue against the motion to dismiss, now they know because you've educated them.
[01:55:51.660 --> 01:55:54.660] They can't say they didn't know.
[01:55:54.660 --> 01:56:02.660] And then from there, if they continue to pursue, now you have the menstrual of balance.
[01:56:02.660 --> 01:56:04.660] Hold on, Amanda.
[01:56:04.660 --> 01:56:08.660] Brett was making a somewhat different point.
[01:56:08.660 --> 01:56:09.660] Okay.
[01:56:09.660 --> 01:56:14.660] These attorneys are not laymen.
[01:56:14.660 --> 01:56:17.660] They are learned counsel.
[01:56:17.660 --> 01:56:22.660] And they're employed because they are learned counsel.
[01:56:22.660 --> 01:56:29.660] The learned counsel to say they don't know is failure to speak with candor to the court.
[01:56:29.660 --> 01:56:32.660] They are presumed to know.
[01:56:32.660 --> 01:56:33.660] True enough.
[01:56:33.660 --> 01:56:41.660] And Section 19 of the Criminal Code of Canada, ignorance of the law is not, well, in short, is not an excuse.
[01:56:41.660 --> 01:57:01.660] So it must be presumed that since they, by statute, know the law, then their act was conscious, intentional, and in terms of mens rea, they had malicious intent.
[01:57:01.660 --> 01:57:11.660] Not only that, under their rules of professional conduct, and I'm just seeing if I can call it up here on my computer really quick, but I don't think I can.
[01:57:11.660 --> 01:57:24.660] But it's under Section 3.1 of the rules where it clearly states that an attorney must be knowledgeable in the area of law in which they are practicing.
[01:57:24.660 --> 01:57:31.660] So you guys are quite right in the sense that if they're going to be in this area, they better know the rules.
[01:57:31.660 --> 01:57:33.660] 3.1?
[01:57:33.660 --> 01:57:36.660] Sorry.
[01:57:36.660 --> 01:57:38.660] It's the rule of professional conduct.
[01:57:38.660 --> 01:57:39.660] Yeah, I know.
[01:57:39.660 --> 01:57:44.660] It's the same in the U.S., 3.1.
[01:57:44.660 --> 01:57:53.660] Section 3.1 in the professional rules of conduct in the U.S. address the same issues.
[01:57:53.660 --> 01:57:55.660] Well, there you go.
[01:57:55.660 --> 01:58:02.660] So, and I'm going to remember, I'm going to call it up so I can give it to you, so I can make sure I'm giving it to you correctly.
[01:58:02.660 --> 01:58:16.660] Because there's three sections that I have been working with in the last couple of days, and it's Section 1, which is the definition, Section 3, and then I also used part of Section 5.
[01:58:16.660 --> 01:58:18.660] So bear with me one second.
[01:58:18.660 --> 01:58:21.660] I'll call it up.
[01:58:21.660 --> 01:58:23.660] Well, all across the country.
[01:58:23.660 --> 01:58:26.660] We have a first-time caller.
[01:58:26.660 --> 01:58:32.660] We're just about to go to our sponsor break.
[01:58:32.660 --> 01:58:39.660] So, Amanda, while you put that up, we might go get those sponsors, and then we'll get back.
[01:58:39.660 --> 01:58:40.660] Wait a minute.
[01:58:40.660 --> 01:58:42.660] That's Vancouver.
[01:58:42.660 --> 01:58:43.660] That's a Canuck.
[01:58:43.660 --> 01:58:45.660] It is a Canuck.
[01:58:45.660 --> 01:58:46.660] We'll be right back.
[01:58:46.660 --> 01:58:47.660] It is.
[01:58:47.660 --> 01:58:49.660] And we'll be right back.
[01:58:49.660 --> 01:58:57.660] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:57.660 --> 01:59:06.660] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.660 --> 01:59:08.660] Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:08.660 --> 01:59:17.660] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:17.660 --> 01:59:27.660] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:27.660 --> 01:59:32.660] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:32.660 --> 01:59:47.660] This comprehensive yet compact Study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.660 --> 01:59:50.660] That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:50.660 --> 02:00:02.660] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.