ROL_2022-11-18_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500]  Spar. It's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.500]  Spar with an extra P.
[00:56.500 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.500]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.500]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.500]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.500 --> 01:17.500]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.500 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:30.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:30.500 --> 01:34.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.500 --> 01:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.500 --> 01:43.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:43.000 --> 01:46.000]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.000 --> 01:48.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.500 --> 01:58.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.500]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.500 --> 02:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.000 --> 02:15.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.500 --> 02:19.500]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[02:19.500 --> 02:22.000]  around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[02:26.000 --> 02:30.000]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.000 --> 02:33.500]  Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.500 --> 02:37.500]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.500 --> 02:38.500]  when he said,
[02:38.500 --> 02:43.500]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.500 --> 02:47.500]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.500 --> 02:51.000]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:51.000 --> 03:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:17.000 --> 03:21.000]  Well, I received my remedy today.
[03:21.000 --> 03:25.000]  It came in a box just like the thing.
[03:25.000 --> 03:28.000]  I accepted it for value right away.
[03:28.000 --> 03:32.000]  It's not sooner, not later.
[03:32.000 --> 03:40.000]  We are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every day.
[03:40.000 --> 03:47.000]  But I can take anything that belongs to me, it's good or too good to use.
[03:47.000 --> 03:54.000]  What I was good for began to work for the good.
[03:54.000 --> 03:58.000]  I know some architects.
[03:58.000 --> 04:02.000]  I know some engineers.
[04:02.000 --> 04:05.000]  They've seen the evidence.
[04:05.000 --> 04:09.000]  They know a certain things quick.
[04:09.000 --> 04:12.000]  I was a blatant deception.
[04:12.000 --> 04:16.000]  What is the nature of what you might gain?
[04:16.000 --> 04:19.000]  I see something headed straight for you.
[04:19.000 --> 04:23.000]  I think it looks just like a train.
[04:23.000 --> 04:25.000]  Okay, we are back.
[04:25.000 --> 04:33.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio on this Friday, the 18th day of November, 2024.
[04:33.000 --> 04:37.000]  And we're going to try Chris in Colorado again.
[04:37.000 --> 04:39.000]  Hello, Chris.
[04:39.000 --> 04:40.000]  Oops.
[04:40.000 --> 04:41.000]  There we go.
[04:41.000 --> 04:42.000]  Hello, Chris.
[04:42.000 --> 04:43.000]  Are you there?
[04:43.000 --> 04:44.000]  Hey, Randy.
[04:44.000 --> 04:45.000]  Got you.
[04:45.000 --> 04:47.000]  All right.
[04:47.000 --> 04:50.000]  What do you have for us today?
[04:50.000 --> 04:52.000]  Did you guys try me earlier tonight?
[04:52.000 --> 04:54.000]  Yeah, we did.
[04:54.000 --> 04:56.000]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[04:56.000 --> 04:59.000]  I tried somebody yesterday and we could hear them snoring.
[04:59.000 --> 05:01.000]  Who was that, Brett?
[05:01.000 --> 05:04.000]  Oh, I think it was Ted.
[05:04.000 --> 05:06.000]  Don't know who that was.
[05:06.000 --> 05:07.000]  I think it was Ted.
[05:07.000 --> 05:09.000]  That was embarrassing, right?
[05:09.000 --> 05:12.000]  Big ear snoring away.
[05:12.000 --> 05:14.000]  Okay, at least you weren't asleep.
[05:14.000 --> 05:16.000]  Okay, what do you have for us?
[05:16.000 --> 05:18.000]  I was trying to de-thaw frozen pipes.
[05:18.000 --> 05:21.000]  That's why I had a slight emergency.
[05:21.000 --> 05:22.000]  But I'm back.
[05:22.000 --> 05:24.000]  Okay, cool.
[05:24.000 --> 05:26.000]  So this will probably be a short call.
[05:26.000 --> 05:31.000]  But I learned a new term today because I keep hammering this question,
[05:31.000 --> 05:36.000]  trying to get to case law and rules and past experience.
[05:36.000 --> 05:39.000]  And I'm still not getting a great answer from federal attorneys,
[05:39.000 --> 05:43.000]  which means they know less than us in so many respects.
[05:43.000 --> 05:45.000]  It's amazing.
[05:45.000 --> 05:49.000]  Anyway, this phrase is called if not but for.
[05:49.000 --> 05:52.000]  And apparently, I don't know how often it's used,
[05:52.000 --> 05:54.000]  but basically if not for the actions of one,
[05:54.000 --> 05:59.000]  then there would be no necessary need for the actions of the other.
[05:59.000 --> 06:03.000]  Expofacto.
[06:03.000 --> 06:05.000]  Expofacto?
[06:05.000 --> 06:08.000]  Expofacto, yeah.
[06:08.000 --> 06:15.000]  Or you're saying something that is after the fact.
[06:15.000 --> 06:20.000]  I think he's talking about exclusivity,
[06:20.000 --> 06:26.000]  that it's caused only because of this.
[06:26.000 --> 06:29.000]  But for that, it would not have happened.
[06:29.000 --> 06:32.000]  There's a Latin term for that.
[06:32.000 --> 06:35.000]  It's not clicking in my brain.
[06:35.000 --> 06:37.000]  Okay.
[06:37.000 --> 06:39.000]  Well, it's the first time I've heard the official term.
[06:39.000 --> 06:41.000]  Therefore, they know it exists.
[06:41.000 --> 06:45.000]  I guess they're still sitting behind the bias that we cannot recover
[06:45.000 --> 06:49.000]  any other damages other than specific damages.
[06:49.000 --> 06:51.000]  So I've been looking through that.
[06:51.000 --> 06:54.000]  I had one attorney who was not – it's funny.
[06:54.000 --> 06:56.000]  I've been at this for almost two years of the case,
[06:56.000 --> 06:58.000]  a year and a half of the case in court.
[06:58.000 --> 07:01.000]  And in the first six months, I got these lawyers, you know,
[07:01.000 --> 07:02.000]  that are supposed to be helping pros say,
[07:02.000 --> 07:04.000]  oh, you're not going to make it before that far.
[07:04.000 --> 07:07.000]  Only a couple of them did that, but they've all flipped now.
[07:07.000 --> 07:11.000]  So because I'm still in court, they're like, oh, you're moving along.
[07:11.000 --> 07:12.000]  You're still here.
[07:12.000 --> 07:13.000]  Yeah.
[07:13.000 --> 07:16.000]  So now they're kind of rooting for me in some ways.
[07:16.000 --> 07:20.000]  And the one guy who said I couldn't recover many damages is now saying,
[07:20.000 --> 07:23.000]  yeah, those are all consequential damages.
[07:23.000 --> 07:27.000]  So I did – I've been trying to figure out, you know,
[07:27.000 --> 07:31.000]  mathematical things to add up and to – for all my expenses.
[07:31.000 --> 07:34.000]  I did – I asked in the Telegram channel,
[07:34.000 --> 07:37.000]  and I think, Brett, you mentioned it, just record everything.
[07:37.000 --> 07:43.000]  So a lot of my things got stolen when my storage locker got cleaned out.
[07:43.000 --> 07:44.000]  I had a box full of stuff.
[07:44.000 --> 07:47.000]  But I can still get some of it back, like a lot of hotel receipts.
[07:47.000 --> 07:50.000]  So I'm going to argue that my travel expenses,
[07:50.000 --> 07:55.000]  because there's a deduction for the IRS per mile.
[07:55.000 --> 07:58.000]  I just don't know what's reasonable there.
[07:58.000 --> 07:59.000]  There's a couple different things.
[07:59.000 --> 08:00.000]  There's business.
[08:00.000 --> 08:01.000]  You can go 60 cents.
[08:01.000 --> 08:04.000]  It used to be about 50 cents in 2018.
[08:04.000 --> 08:11.000]  And then there's like a standard deduction for travel, which is 22 cents per mile.
[08:11.000 --> 08:13.000]  I'm just nervous about this.
[08:13.000 --> 08:16.000]  I'm nervous about sitting down in front of a magistrate judge,
[08:16.000 --> 08:20.000]  and then they get all – you know, they get –
[08:20.000 --> 08:32.000]  Send me an email on the IRS issue, and I'll send it to David Lewis.
[08:32.000 --> 08:33.000]  Well, no, it's not an IRS issue.
[08:33.000 --> 08:35.000]  I'm just using it as an example.
[08:35.000 --> 08:38.000]  So I got defrauded, and my vehicle gets damaged,
[08:38.000 --> 08:42.000]  and it's an illegal issue over in Chicago, right?
[08:42.000 --> 08:46.000]  If I didn't have that matter, I wouldn't have had to travel to Chicago,
[08:46.000 --> 08:50.000]  you know, like six or seven times in order to document the illegal behavior
[08:50.000 --> 08:53.000]  in order to get remedy through the city.
[08:53.000 --> 08:58.000]  And so if I hadn't have done that work myself, the city wouldn't have done it.
[08:58.000 --> 09:01.000]  The police refused to do it, so I had to do it.
[09:01.000 --> 09:04.000]  So those are legitimate consequential damages,
[09:04.000 --> 09:08.000]  but I keep getting a 50-50 on being able to use those.
[09:08.000 --> 09:10.000]  And in federal court, they're kind of sticklers.
[09:10.000 --> 09:12.000]  They're either going to say yes or no, and then they're going to say,
[09:12.000 --> 09:14.000]  sorry, we don't have jurisdiction because you're now –
[09:14.000 --> 09:19.000]  you're no longer above $75,000 to be in our courts.
[09:19.000 --> 09:22.000]  But they haven't said that yet, so that's where I'm just trying to –
[09:22.000 --> 09:25.000]  I'm trying to find some more stuff to say, okay, yeah, you can –
[09:25.000 --> 09:26.000]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
[09:26.000 --> 09:37.000]  Do you have to be above $75,000 and something like diversity of jurisdiction?
[09:37.000 --> 09:41.000]  I thought diversity of jurisdiction was enough to get you in there.
[09:41.000 --> 09:43.000]  No, it's both.
[09:43.000 --> 09:51.000]  So diversity means citizen of another state, but also above $75,000.
[09:51.000 --> 09:54.000]  Okay, I've never filed one that low.
[09:54.000 --> 09:57.000]  That's why that was a question I'd never addressed.
[09:57.000 --> 09:58.000]  Okay.
[09:58.000 --> 10:04.000]  So you should have asked for twice as much and let them argue it down.
[10:04.000 --> 10:10.000]  I've implied it in my complaint, but well over $200,000 because, you know,
[10:10.000 --> 10:13.000]  punitive – I found some court cases where punitive is about –
[10:13.000 --> 10:16.000]  they say it's like a digit – one zero up.
[10:16.000 --> 10:18.000]  So if you have $10,000, you can ask for $100,000.
[10:18.000 --> 10:20.000]  If you have $200,000, you can ask for $200,000.
[10:20.000 --> 10:23.000]  If you can stretch it a little more, you can probably get a little bit more.
[10:23.000 --> 10:27.000]  But a 10 is – like a number of 10 to 1 is a very comfortable area.
[10:27.000 --> 10:33.000]  But I've seen 25 and 30 to 1, but there's been some reversals on some of that,
[10:33.000 --> 10:35.000]  and I've brought it down a bit.
[10:35.000 --> 10:40.000]  So now that I've proven that, you know, we have a legitimate claim,
[10:40.000 --> 10:42.000]  now I really have to prove the damages.
[10:42.000 --> 10:44.000]  And so I'm getting a little nervous because I'm in federal court.
[10:44.000 --> 10:46.000]  I thought that it's worked to my advantage.
[10:46.000 --> 10:47.000]  We're in state court.
[10:47.000 --> 10:48.000]  You can play nasty.
[10:48.000 --> 10:51.000]  You can do a lot of weird things because they're doing it themselves.
[10:51.000 --> 10:55.000]  I almost want to be back in – I almost want to be in state court now.
[10:55.000 --> 11:00.000]  But anyway, I'm just trying to justify those expenses again,
[11:00.000 --> 11:02.000]  and I'm just having a hard time.
[11:02.000 --> 11:04.000]  There's a dictionary channel.
[11:04.000 --> 11:08.000]  I get back and forth.
[11:08.000 --> 11:17.000]  So any insight on how to present my expenses that resulted from having to come back
[11:17.000 --> 11:20.000]  and do my own investigative work and do my own proving of the crime
[11:20.000 --> 11:23.000]  and documenting the crime.
[11:23.000 --> 11:28.000]  Those are actual costs, and you have receipts and such?
[11:28.000 --> 11:29.000]  I can get them.
[11:29.000 --> 11:34.000]  I lost them all in that fast, but I can get them again.
[11:34.000 --> 11:37.000]  Well, if you've got the receipts, it will be hard for them to get past it.
[11:37.000 --> 11:42.000]  Those are actual costs.
[11:42.000 --> 11:44.000]  Okay.
[11:44.000 --> 11:45.000]  I agree.
[11:45.000 --> 11:49.000]  I agree.
[11:49.000 --> 11:53.000]  And then we're going to be sitting at the poker table here probably in the next couple months.
[11:53.000 --> 11:57.000]  They really want us to sit down for a settlement conference.
[11:57.000 --> 12:02.000]  And I think we're allowed a petition to get an attorney for our time just for that.
[12:02.000 --> 12:05.000]  I think the federal court is a lot one.
[12:05.000 --> 12:10.000]  And at that table, you know, that's the other thing.
[12:10.000 --> 12:20.000]  I have to present a reasonable compromise to my initial claim amount, my initial complaint amount.
[12:20.000 --> 12:23.000]  Have you asked for a punitive?
[12:23.000 --> 12:25.000]  I have, yes.
[12:25.000 --> 12:29.000]  Okay, then you can – you have your actual costs.
[12:29.000 --> 12:31.000]  You never go below that.
[12:31.000 --> 12:36.000]  But you can haggle on the punitive.
[12:36.000 --> 12:41.000]  They're going to lowball you on their initial offer.
[12:41.000 --> 12:49.000]  And my standard response is this is not a point from which I will begin to negotiate.
[12:49.000 --> 12:52.000]  Okay.
[12:52.000 --> 12:55.000]  But this is just haggling back and forth.
[12:55.000 --> 12:56.000]  They're going to lowball you.
[12:56.000 --> 12:58.000]  You're going to highball them.
[12:58.000 --> 13:05.000]  And then you've got to figure what the judge will consider reasonable.
[13:05.000 --> 13:13.000]  Well, the magistrate has strictly allotted authority over settlement issues and settlement conferences.
[13:13.000 --> 13:16.000]  And she's the one who's going to be playing with us for a while.
[13:16.000 --> 13:23.000]  The main judge is just – he's not really participating except just to rule on amended complaints and motions and things like that.
[13:23.000 --> 13:28.000]  So they threw us right into the magistrate because they clearly want it settled.
[13:28.000 --> 13:30.000]  But I don't have to settle.
[13:30.000 --> 13:32.000]  I do not have to settle.
[13:32.000 --> 13:35.000]  I can take it all the way to trial.
[13:35.000 --> 13:38.000]  But it's going to be – I want the experience too.
[13:38.000 --> 13:39.000]  I want to sit down.
[13:39.000 --> 13:42.000]  And have you ever done a settlement conference?
[13:42.000 --> 13:43.000]  No.
[13:43.000 --> 13:46.000]  Okay.
[13:46.000 --> 13:51.000]  I want to pull one of these cards out and just say, look, how much does it already cost you?
[13:51.000 --> 13:54.000]  And how much will it cost you if we go to trial?
[13:54.000 --> 13:58.000]  And let them know that I'm aware of that.
[13:58.000 --> 13:59.000]  Good.
[13:59.000 --> 14:03.000]  Well, I have a case now that I'm setting it up just for that purpose.
[14:03.000 --> 14:18.000]  This is Victoria County. I'm doing everything to get them to come to the table and make me an offer I can't refuse.
[14:18.000 --> 14:20.000]  They'll offer me nothing.
[14:20.000 --> 14:26.000]  I'll ask for the moon and we'll see what happens.
[14:26.000 --> 14:29.000]  Let them kick it around and see where we can come to.
[14:29.000 --> 14:37.000]  And then every time they do something I don't like I'll bargrieve them again.
[14:37.000 --> 14:43.000]  Just so they remember that they want this to be over.
[14:43.000 --> 14:45.000]  Yeah, I got to start bargrieving more.
[14:45.000 --> 14:47.000]  I keep forgetting.
[14:47.000 --> 14:50.000]  The first one I did was so much fun.
[14:50.000 --> 14:56.000]  I bargrieved the son for what the father did.
[14:56.000 --> 14:58.000]  In the law firm?
[14:58.000 --> 15:00.000]  I looked up Cullen.
[15:00.000 --> 15:03.000]  I knew the name Cullen, so I looked up Cullen Law Firm.
[15:03.000 --> 15:10.000]  And there were three Cullens, Mama Cullen, Papa Cullen, and Baby Cullen.
[15:10.000 --> 15:19.000]  So I knew Papa Cullen was too smart to do something this stupid, so I bargrieved Baby Cullen.
[15:19.000 --> 15:24.000]  I doubted he was happy.
[15:24.000 --> 15:29.000]  But that may be a way to help. Have you bargrieved the lawyers?
[15:29.000 --> 15:31.000]  Not all of them, no.
[15:31.000 --> 15:33.000]  I've been trying to pick.
[15:33.000 --> 15:37.000]  They're all messing up so bad I've been trying to figure out how to hit them in the right sequence.
[15:37.000 --> 15:42.000]  I had the attorney, so when I missed that brief status hearing,
[15:42.000 --> 15:46.000]  the attorney gets on an email immediately to remind me how incompetent I was.
[15:46.000 --> 15:50.000]  But after I corrected it, he got back on another email and he says,
[15:50.000 --> 15:55.000]  be sure to CC me every single time or it will be improper.
[15:55.000 --> 15:57.000]  Well, duh, I know that.
[15:57.000 --> 16:07.000]  So I'm going to bargrieve him for what is it, unsolicited legal advice?
[16:07.000 --> 16:08.000]  I didn't ask for that.
[16:08.000 --> 16:11.000]  And he knows I know that, so why would he be such a snoot about it, right?
[16:11.000 --> 16:17.000]  So very improper.
[16:17.000 --> 16:20.000]  Okay, so actual costs, that's the terminology.
[16:20.000 --> 16:22.000]  That's the argument I can probably use in front of the judge.
[16:22.000 --> 16:24.000]  These are actual costs, Your Honor.
[16:24.000 --> 16:27.000]  I would not, if it would not be for what they did,
[16:27.000 --> 16:31.000]  I would not have to incur these costs in order to remedy this situation.
[16:31.000 --> 16:35.000]  And it also costs you your time. Your time is valuable.
[16:35.000 --> 16:38.000]  It is, yeah.
[16:38.000 --> 16:42.000]  Very, very valuable.
[16:42.000 --> 16:43.000]  Okay.
[16:43.000 --> 16:44.000]  All right.
[16:44.000 --> 16:47.000]  Hang on, about to go to our sponsors.
[16:47.000 --> 16:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[16:50.000 --> 16:53.000]  Let's see, we've got four on the board,
[16:53.000 --> 16:59.000]  so I won't give out the call-in number until we get rid of Chris here.
[16:59.000 --> 17:00.000]  Casey.
[17:00.000 --> 17:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[17:05.000 --> 17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[17:09.000 --> 17:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[17:13.000 --> 17:15.000]  and now you can win two.
[17:15.000 --> 17:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[17:19.000 --> 17:21.000]  using federal civil rights statutes,
[17:21.000 --> 17:25.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[17:25.000 --> 17:27.000]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[17:27.000 --> 17:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[17:29.000 --> 17:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:34.000 --> 17:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:39.000 --> 17:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.000 --> 17:44.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[17:44.000 --> 17:49.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.000 --> 17:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[17:57.000 --> 18:01.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[18:01.000 --> 18:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[18:05.000 --> 18:07.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[18:07.000 --> 18:09.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[18:09.000 --> 18:12.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.000 --> 18:15.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[18:15.000 --> 18:17.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[18:17.000 --> 18:19.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.000 --> 18:22.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[18:22.000 --> 18:25.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[18:25.000 --> 18:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[18:28.000 --> 18:31.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[18:31.000 --> 18:33.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[18:33.000 --> 18:35.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:35.000 --> 18:37.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[18:37.000 --> 18:40.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[18:40.000 --> 18:42.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[18:42.000 --> 18:45.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[18:45.000 --> 18:47.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[18:50.000 --> 18:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.000 --> 19:11.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[19:11.000 --> 19:38.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:38.000 --> 19:44.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Chris in Colorado.
[19:44.000 --> 19:48.000]  Okay, where were we, Chris?
[19:48.000 --> 19:49.000]  That was it.
[19:49.000 --> 19:54.000]  I was just kind of rubbing some verbal terminology on you guys
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  to make sure I could be a little more confident in my discussion with the judge.
[20:00.000 --> 20:02.000]  Okay, I'm having a little trouble today.
[20:02.000 --> 20:05.000]  I had a cold or something land on me,
[20:05.000 --> 20:12.000]  but I'm struggling a little here to even be able to think.
[20:12.000 --> 20:16.000]  Okay, so you're done, Chris?
[20:16.000 --> 20:17.000]  Yeah, I think we're good.
[20:17.000 --> 20:18.000]  Thanks, guys.
[20:18.000 --> 20:19.000]  Thank you again.
[20:19.000 --> 20:20.000]  Okay, thank you, Chris.
[20:20.000 --> 20:27.000]  Now we're going to go into Ms. Sweet Tina.
[20:27.000 --> 20:29.000]  Hello, Sweet Tina.
[20:29.000 --> 20:33.000]  You noticed I didn't say anything about being chervish,
[20:33.000 --> 20:36.000]  and I would never mention such a thing.
[20:36.000 --> 20:37.000]  Oh, really?
[20:37.000 --> 20:38.000]  I'm sure you wouldn't.
[20:38.000 --> 20:39.000]  By the way...
[20:39.000 --> 20:48.000]  Oh, I would never say chervish in the same sentence with Tina, never.
[20:48.000 --> 20:54.000]  Mr. Randy, you lie like a cheap Chinese watch.
[20:54.000 --> 20:57.000]  Okay, what do you have for us to...
[20:57.000 --> 21:00.000]  Oh, have you used that tool?
[21:00.000 --> 21:03.000]  Yes, I have been using that tool.
[21:03.000 --> 21:07.000]  It's a little difficult to get used to, but I am trying to use it.
[21:07.000 --> 21:08.000]  Good.
[21:08.000 --> 21:13.000]  I'm working on it once a day because twice a day is a little hard.
[21:13.000 --> 21:17.000]  Well, if it's hurting you much, you're pressing too hard.
[21:17.000 --> 21:19.000]  Okay, well, I'll keep working on it.
[21:19.000 --> 21:22.000]  Just till it irritates a little, not till it hurts a lot.
[21:22.000 --> 21:28.000]  I sent Tina one of these chiropractic tools I built.
[21:28.000 --> 21:36.000]  It's a tool designed to inflict copious amounts of pain on yourself with.
[21:36.000 --> 21:37.000]  And it does.
[21:37.000 --> 21:38.000]  It's true.
[21:38.000 --> 21:43.000]  It does inflict copious amounts of pain.
[21:43.000 --> 21:44.000]  Okay, what do you...
[21:44.000 --> 21:47.000]  It's written in your writing that you promised.
[21:47.000 --> 21:50.000]  So remember to send me that so I can read it.
[21:50.000 --> 21:55.000]  But then we'll go on to what I wanted to ask about.
[21:55.000 --> 21:58.000]  First of all, that guy, Greg, that was on earlier from California,
[21:58.000 --> 22:05.000]  if he wants to go against the medical establishment for all that ridiculous stuff on COVID, I will join him.
[22:05.000 --> 22:08.000]  So let him know.
[22:08.000 --> 22:09.000]  Good.
[22:09.000 --> 22:10.000]  It's crazy.
[22:10.000 --> 22:19.000]  I will be a part of any kind of lawsuit he wants to present against us, stupid medical establishment.
[22:19.000 --> 22:24.000]  Okay, before you get into your issues, I have a question about politics.
[22:24.000 --> 22:25.000]  Oh, yeah.
[22:25.000 --> 22:37.000]  What do you expect the effect of this move toward the red that California has experienced?
[22:37.000 --> 22:40.000]  First, can you explain what actually happened?
[22:40.000 --> 22:46.000]  I haven't heard the details of the election in California.
[22:46.000 --> 22:54.000]  Well, I don't know. It's an anomaly because we've been blue for so damn long.
[22:54.000 --> 23:03.000]  I just, I can't understand it, but I'm hoping it lasts and I'm hoping it spreads rapidly
[23:03.000 --> 23:10.000]  because we need to get back to the truth, the rule of law.
[23:10.000 --> 23:20.000]  We need to get away from, I think people are sick to death of the problems in San Francisco,
[23:20.000 --> 23:25.000]  the homelessness, the filth on the streets, the crime.
[23:25.000 --> 23:29.000]  You know, all I hear from people is they're sick to death of that.
[23:29.000 --> 23:36.000]  And I know personally people who are moving out of state because of those problems,
[23:36.000 --> 23:41.000]  the crime, the filth and the politics.
[23:41.000 --> 23:48.000]  It's unbelievable how many people I've talked to who are absolutely moving to Florida and Texas.
[23:48.000 --> 23:49.000]  Texas.
[23:49.000 --> 23:50.000]  Where are they going?
[23:50.000 --> 23:59.000]  Somebody proposed we put a sign out on Highway 10 near New Mexico that welcomes Californians to Texas
[23:59.000 --> 24:05.000]  and asks that they keep going until they go out the other side.
[24:05.000 --> 24:09.000]  Well, just don't bring the California Democratic policies to Texas.
[24:09.000 --> 24:11.000]  That's what you've got to tell them.
[24:11.000 --> 24:14.000]  You're welcome if you don't bring that here.
[24:14.000 --> 24:17.000]  Yeah, don't vote what you just fled.
[24:17.000 --> 24:22.000]  Yeah, don't do to Texas what you did to California.
[24:22.000 --> 24:26.000]  So what do you think the move to the right is going to do?
[24:26.000 --> 24:31.000]  Do you expect much change because of that?
[24:31.000 --> 24:33.000]  Not right away, I don't know.
[24:33.000 --> 24:35.000]  I think it's too entrenched here.
[24:35.000 --> 24:38.000]  I think it's going to be a very difficult move.
[24:38.000 --> 24:47.000]  I hope I'm surprised, but I don't hold out a lot of hope because we still have Newscum in charge.
[24:47.000 --> 24:55.000]  And he's aligned with Pelosi and all the rest of the, you know, the words I can't say on here.
[24:55.000 --> 25:02.000]  So unless we get rid of Newscum, I don't think we're going to go far.
[25:02.000 --> 25:04.000]  Well, that's depressing.
[25:04.000 --> 25:09.000]  I was hoping you was going to say, yeah, everything's going to change overnight.
[25:09.000 --> 25:15.000]  Well, I wish, but I can hope and dream.
[25:15.000 --> 25:18.000]  Anyway, I wanted to ask you a quick question.
[25:18.000 --> 25:25.000]  I've been posted a little bit on the Telegram site about the judges and their oath of office
[25:25.000 --> 25:30.000]  and the requirements, and I wanted to get your input on it
[25:30.000 --> 25:38.000]  because, you know, all public officials, including judges, have to take an oath of office
[25:38.000 --> 25:44.000]  before they enter and can, you know, do their duties of the office.
[25:44.000 --> 25:46.000]  Okay?
[25:46.000 --> 25:56.000]  So why is it that some of these judges do not have oaths of office on file
[25:56.000 --> 26:02.000]  with the Secretary of State's office, and they are required to have those?
[26:02.000 --> 26:08.000]  And does it make their rulings invalid or should it make their rulings invalid
[26:08.000 --> 26:16.000]  if they do not have a valid up-to-date oath of office?
[26:16.000 --> 26:24.000]  That would probably require a petition in core warrant.
[26:24.000 --> 26:27.000]  What is the petition in core warrant?
[26:27.000 --> 26:34.000]  Core warrant is a method for removing someone from office for bad behavior.
[26:34.000 --> 26:42.000]  You can maintain that the officer never properly occupied the office
[26:42.000 --> 26:49.000]  as they failed to meet the requirements and petition that they be removed core warrant,
[26:49.000 --> 26:58.000]  getting all of their rulings overturned would probably be next to impossible
[26:58.000 --> 27:03.000]  unless you could show that all their rulings were horribly improper
[27:03.000 --> 27:11.000]  because in doing that, you would work a horrendous harm to all of those people
[27:11.000 --> 27:17.000]  who went through the court system to seek remedy.
[27:17.000 --> 27:21.000]  It would nullify all of that.
[27:21.000 --> 27:26.000]  Well, as it should be, if they're being paid to be a judge,
[27:26.000 --> 27:30.000]  then they're too damn lazy to do what they're supposed to do.
[27:30.000 --> 27:37.000]  It says here in the 1363, each judge of a superior court, the county clerk,
[27:37.000 --> 27:41.000]  the executive officer or court administrator of the superior court,
[27:41.000 --> 27:45.000]  and the recorder shall file a copy of his or her official oath
[27:45.000 --> 27:51.000]  signed with his or her own proper signature in the office of the secretary of state
[27:51.000 --> 27:58.000]  as soon as he or she has taken and subscribed his or her own.
[27:58.000 --> 28:10.000]  Has anyone filed charges against the judge for impersonating a public official?
[28:10.000 --> 28:17.000]  I have not, but I have found that two of the judges that ruled in some of my prior cases
[28:17.000 --> 28:20.000]  did not have, well, actually more than two,
[28:20.000 --> 28:27.000]  they do not have an oath of office on record with the secretary of state.
[28:27.000 --> 28:32.000]  I have a letter from the secretary of state stating that, you know,
[28:32.000 --> 28:40.000]  after due diligence and much research, they cannot find oath of office for this list of judges.
[28:40.000 --> 28:45.000]  And I have two of them that they give me their oath of office,
[28:45.000 --> 28:50.000]  but there's a date on there that's an expiration date.
[28:50.000 --> 28:55.000]  And it's before, the expiration date is before they ruled on my matter.
[28:55.000 --> 29:01.000]  Why should they be allowed to rule if they don't follow the law?
[29:01.000 --> 29:04.000]  Because no one's challenged it.
[29:04.000 --> 29:07.000]  Well, I want to because I'm tired of it.
[29:07.000 --> 29:08.000]  Good.
[29:08.000 --> 29:12.000]  But I don't know how to challenge it because I don't want to accept their rulings
[29:12.000 --> 29:19.000]  if one of them did not even sign his order.
[29:19.000 --> 29:24.000]  That's a federal judge that did not sign his order.
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000]  Oh, wait, these are federal judges?
[29:27.000 --> 29:35.000]  You might consider filing a complaint against them with the attorney general in D.C.
[29:35.000 --> 29:36.000]  Okay.
[29:36.000 --> 29:39.000]  We'll speak to that when we come back on the other side.
[29:39.000 --> 29:44.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[29:44.000 --> 29:47.000]  Let's see, the call board's full.
[29:47.000 --> 29:49.000]  Looks like we have a first-time caller.
[29:49.000 --> 29:51.000]  So hang on.
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000]  We're going to our sponsors.
[29:53.000 --> 30:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:23.000]  Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:23.000 --> 30:48.000]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:48.000 --> 30:56.000]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:56.000 --> 31:00.000]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[31:00.000 --> 31:07.000]  A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:13.000 --> 31:16.000]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes.
[31:16.000 --> 31:21.000]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:21.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:35.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[31:35.000 --> 31:38.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:38.000 --> 31:42.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.000 --> 31:46.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[31:46.000 --> 31:52.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.000 --> 31:55.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:55.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.000 --> 32:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[32:06.000 --> 32:13.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[32:13.000 --> 32:18.000]  where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:18.000 --> 32:25.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[32:25.000 --> 32:29.000]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[32:29.000 --> 32:33.000]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:33.000 --> 32:40.000]  The second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[32:40.000 --> 32:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.000 --> 32:51.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:51.000 --> 32:57.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[32:57.000 --> 33:01.000]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:01.000 --> 33:11.000]  Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:31.000 --> 33:48.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:48.000 --> 33:54.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California.
[33:54.000 --> 33:57.000]  Okay, Tina, Oath of Office.
[33:57.000 --> 34:02.000]  We've heard on the show, we've heard a lot of people go into Oath of Office.
[34:02.000 --> 34:06.000]  And normally, that's not an issue I would care a whole lot about,
[34:06.000 --> 34:14.000]  but if you've got bad judges rendering bad rulings, it's certainly be a good thing to go after them for.
[34:14.000 --> 34:18.000]  Well, you know, I've got one here that the Phillips is here.
[34:18.000 --> 34:24.000]  His oath that was filed in 2007,
[34:24.000 --> 34:31.000]  it says for the term ending January the 7th, 2013, this is the one who didn't sign his orders.
[34:31.000 --> 34:36.000]  Wait a minute, they expect us to follow the rules, but they don't have to?
[34:36.000 --> 34:38.000]  You know, that to me is wrong.
[34:38.000 --> 34:41.000]  Yeah, not even the rules to be a judge.
[34:41.000 --> 34:44.000]  Yes, I hold them to a higher standard.
[34:44.000 --> 34:48.000]  If they can't follow the rules, why are they saying we should?
[34:48.000 --> 34:56.000]  Goes to my favorite quote, H.G. Wells wrote an outline of history.
[34:56.000 --> 35:02.000]  And in book one on speaking to the corruption of the popes during the Dark Ages,
[35:02.000 --> 35:09.000]  he very aptly observed that the giver of the law most owes the law allegiance.
[35:09.000 --> 35:14.000]  He of all beings should behave as though the law compels him,
[35:14.000 --> 35:21.000]  but it is the universal failing of mankind that what we are given to administer,
[35:21.000 --> 35:26.000]  we promptly presume we own.
[35:26.000 --> 35:30.000]  And that's exactly what's happening.
[35:30.000 --> 35:34.000]  But is it criminal or how do you address it?
[35:34.000 --> 35:40.000]  Because apart from the letter that you got from the Secretary of State, let me read this paragraph to you.
[35:40.000 --> 35:48.000]  I already read 1363A, which says they're required to file, you know, timely after they take the oath.
[35:48.000 --> 35:57.000]  So this letter, after the long list of judges that they cannot find the oath of office on file where they're supposed to file it,
[35:57.000 --> 36:01.000]  it says failure to locate an oath of office for an individual
[36:01.000 --> 36:09.000]  does not indicate that the individual is required to file an oath of office pursuant to government code section 1363.
[36:09.000 --> 36:12.000]  Didn't I just read that and it says they are?
[36:12.000 --> 36:17.000]  Or that the individual is in violation of the law for failure to file.
[36:17.000 --> 36:20.000]  Okay. Okay. Hold on.
[36:20.000 --> 36:29.000]  Are there any judges in any circumstances that are not required to have an oath of office on record?
[36:29.000 --> 36:31.000]  Not that I found.
[36:31.000 --> 36:38.000]  Every public official and every judge is required to take an oath of office to perform their duty.
[36:38.000 --> 36:40.000]  Okay. Where did you read this from?
[36:40.000 --> 36:45.000]  Where it said just because they didn't have an oath didn't mean they couldn't take the office.
[36:45.000 --> 36:53.000]  This is the letter that I got from the Secretary of State when I requested the office of the oath of office
[36:53.000 --> 36:58.000]  for all the judges in my case, both appeal judges, federal judges, state judges,
[36:58.000 --> 37:05.000]  and most all of them did not have an oath of office that could be located with the Secretary of State.
[37:05.000 --> 37:12.000]  And the Secretary of State told you this and you believed the Secretary of State?
[37:12.000 --> 37:15.000]  Well, no, I don't believe that.
[37:15.000 --> 37:23.000]  They're contradicting 1363 when they say there is no statutory or regulatory authority prescribing the filing process
[37:23.000 --> 37:26.000]  or penalties for failure to file an oath of office.
[37:26.000 --> 37:34.000]  Now, I haven't seen the penalties, but with the Secretary of State pursuant to government code section 1363.
[37:34.000 --> 37:41.000]  Therefore, the Secretary of State does not issue certificates of no record for oath of office.
[37:41.000 --> 37:50.000]  Why? 1363 clearly states that they are supposed to be filing that.
[37:50.000 --> 37:57.000]  So if the Secretary of State does not do this and does not follow through, why not?
[37:57.000 --> 38:01.000]  Well, it's just saying they're not going to certify to you, is that right?
[38:01.000 --> 38:06.000]  If they don't have it, they won't certify to you that it doesn't exist.
[38:06.000 --> 38:08.000]  Am I hearing that right?
[38:08.000 --> 38:14.000]  They cannot find it on file.
[38:14.000 --> 38:22.000]  You might consider charging the Secretary of State with temporary government document.
[38:22.000 --> 38:27.000]  If we presume that the judge does have a properly filed oath,
[38:27.000 --> 38:34.000]  then it is the duty of the Secretary of State, if that's the one they're filed with, to maintain those records.
[38:34.000 --> 38:40.000]  And if they fail to do so, if the records were put somewhere where they were not accessible,
[38:40.000 --> 38:45.000]  that's tampering with the government document.
[38:45.000 --> 38:47.000]  Well, that's what I'm seeing.
[38:47.000 --> 38:52.000]  And there's a few judges, there's only I think two of these judges, one, my most recent one,
[38:52.000 --> 38:59.000]  that has an oath of office on file that is valid for the time.
[38:59.000 --> 39:06.000]  I mean, one that was out of date is 2015 and one as 2030.
[39:06.000 --> 39:12.000]  And this is the one judge didn't ever sign his orders and his oath of office is out of date,
[39:12.000 --> 39:17.000]  according to the oath of office on file with the Secretary of State.
[39:17.000 --> 39:22.000]  They can't be that lazy to not do what they're supposed to do,
[39:22.000 --> 39:25.000]  or are they just going to say, well, I'm a judge, I don't care,
[39:25.000 --> 39:30.000]  and you shouldn't care because no matter what, I can tell you what to do.
[39:30.000 --> 39:33.000]  Well, filed against them.
[39:33.000 --> 39:38.000]  You may, you know, this is the kind of thing you take to the Fed.
[39:38.000 --> 39:46.000]  If the state refuses to rule properly, you appeal it up to the Fed.
[39:46.000 --> 39:52.000]  So I'm coming up to this appeal and I've got three of the judges here
[39:52.000 --> 39:57.000]  that the state can't find the oath of office for.
[39:57.000 --> 40:02.000]  And these are the same ones that threatened to sanction me if I kept litigating.
[40:02.000 --> 40:05.000]  How do I approach that?
[40:05.000 --> 40:10.000]  Do I file just a professional conduct complaint with the state?
[40:10.000 --> 40:12.000]  How do, what do I do?
[40:12.000 --> 40:16.000]  No, this is not, this doesn't strike me as professional conduct.
[40:16.000 --> 40:20.000]  It strikes me more as criminal.
[40:20.000 --> 40:23.000]  But how do, what criminal is it?
[40:23.000 --> 40:26.000]  Impersonating a public official.
[40:26.000 --> 40:28.000]  Okay.
[40:28.000 --> 40:32.000]  He never properly took the office, therefore he abandoned the office.
[40:32.000 --> 40:35.000]  And then he's holding himself out as a public official
[40:35.000 --> 40:42.000]  when he's not, hasn't properly taken the office.
[40:42.000 --> 40:46.000]  That sounds like it would work.
[40:46.000 --> 40:49.000]  It should get their attention.
[40:49.000 --> 40:51.000]  And where do you file that?
[40:51.000 --> 40:57.000]  Do you say they are filing it with state or the Fed?
[40:57.000 --> 41:02.000]  So where do I send that complaint, that criminal complaint?
[41:02.000 --> 41:05.000]  Well, after dealing with California,
[41:05.000 --> 41:09.000]  and as much as you've dealt with the judges in California,
[41:09.000 --> 41:15.000]  you might look at taking that to the state as a RICO.
[41:15.000 --> 41:19.000]  You have all these judges rendering bogus rulings,
[41:19.000 --> 41:22.000]  and none of them are proper judges.
[41:22.000 --> 41:30.000]  And they're denying you and others similarly situated in the due course of the laws.
[41:30.000 --> 41:32.000]  Yeah.
[41:32.000 --> 41:35.000]  Because they're required to...
[41:35.000 --> 41:39.000]  And file it in D.C.
[41:39.000 --> 41:41.000]  File in D.C.
[41:41.000 --> 41:45.000]  You can do it by email in D.C., by e-file.
[41:45.000 --> 41:55.000]  And file with the, what is it, the third court, Article III court in D.C.
[41:55.000 --> 41:58.000]  Article III court, okay.
[41:58.000 --> 42:01.000]  Yeah, because I really want to hold them accountable.
[42:01.000 --> 42:03.000]  You know, they hold us accountable.
[42:03.000 --> 42:05.000]  Why can't we hold them accountable?
[42:05.000 --> 42:07.000]  Exactly.
[42:07.000 --> 42:11.000]  You know, if you're too lazy to sign your orders, then the orders shouldn't be valid.
[42:11.000 --> 42:19.000]  If you're too lazy to file and ensure that your oath of office is filed as required with the Secretary of State,
[42:19.000 --> 42:24.000]  then you shouldn't be a judge.
[42:24.000 --> 42:26.000]  Sounds reasonable.
[42:26.000 --> 42:33.000]  And we've had a lot of people complain about it, but as far as I know, nobody's actually taking it on.
[42:33.000 --> 42:34.000]  Well...
[42:34.000 --> 42:38.000]  Or if they have, they never told us about it.
[42:38.000 --> 42:44.000]  You know, it may seem petty to some and a minor thing, but I don't think it should be a minor.
[42:44.000 --> 42:46.000]  They're required to know the law.
[42:46.000 --> 42:49.000]  They're required to keep up to date with the law.
[42:49.000 --> 42:56.000]  They're required to do certain things to have the privilege of practicing law and being a judge,
[42:56.000 --> 43:00.000]  just like the attorneys are required to take an oath,
[43:00.000 --> 43:05.000]  and they're required to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the state,
[43:05.000 --> 43:09.000]  and they're required to not to tell the truth.
[43:09.000 --> 43:13.000]  Well, they don't, and nobody holds them accountable.
[43:13.000 --> 43:17.000]  Okay, Tina, you're up.
[43:17.000 --> 43:25.000]  You have enough egregious behavior by judges to show a pattern of mistreatment
[43:25.000 --> 43:33.000]  by judges who don't have a proper oath of office and no standing to hold the office at all.
[43:33.000 --> 43:38.000]  Yes, I like that. No standing to hold the office if they have me filed.
[43:38.000 --> 43:43.000]  And this is something you might get the feds to pick up.
[43:43.000 --> 43:46.000]  Okay, well, I can try.
[43:46.000 --> 43:49.000]  Okay, do you have something for us on the other side?
[43:49.000 --> 43:52.000]  At noon, I'll let you go to assemble the floor on the other side.
[43:52.000 --> 43:55.000]  Okay, thank you.
[43:55.000 --> 44:00.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.000 --> 44:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.000 --> 44:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.000 --> 44:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.000 --> 44:25.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.000 --> 44:31.000]  Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[44:31.000 --> 44:36.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor
[44:36.000 --> 44:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:40.000 --> 44:43.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:47.000 --> 44:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:52.000 --> 44:55.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[44:55.000 --> 44:59.000]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:59.000 --> 45:01.000]  Order now.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:15.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:15.000 --> 46:25.000]  Thank you.
[46:45.000 --> 46:53.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:53.000 --> 46:56.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:56.000 --> 47:00.000]  And we've got what looks like two new first-time callers.
[47:00.000 --> 47:03.000]  Going to our first one.
[47:03.000 --> 47:08.000]  If you are in, what was it, Brett?
[47:08.000 --> 47:15.000]  San Dusky, Ohio.
[47:15.000 --> 47:18.000]  Talk to us.
[47:18.000 --> 47:19.000]  Hello, hello?
[47:19.000 --> 47:21.000]  Hello, hello.
[47:21.000 --> 47:23.000]  Give us a first name and a state.
[47:23.000 --> 47:28.000]  I'm pretty sure we looked at 419, and it's in Ohio?
[47:28.000 --> 47:30.000]  Correct.
[47:30.000 --> 47:31.000]  Correct.
[47:31.000 --> 47:38.000]  First name Lance, I just have a brief question for you just regarding judicial complaints.
[47:38.000 --> 47:42.000]  Oh, one of our favorite subjects.
[47:42.000 --> 47:43.000]  Okay.
[47:43.000 --> 47:52.000]  I have an existing court case, and in one of the hearings, the judge had basically told me,
[47:52.000 --> 47:54.000]  and I don't remember what he said word for word,
[47:54.000 --> 48:04.000]  but I was told that he did not want me to send anything into the court to the clerk's office
[48:04.000 --> 48:07.000]  with any pleadings, filings, et cetera.
[48:07.000 --> 48:14.000]  Just a tiny bit of background, I had previously fired the attorney that I had hired,
[48:14.000 --> 48:17.000]  which he didn't seem to like very much,
[48:17.000 --> 48:24.000]  and I was given what they call a court-appointed counsel, standby counsel,
[48:24.000 --> 48:31.000]  so basically I'm being told that I have to use this individual that I never did ask for,
[48:31.000 --> 48:34.000]  like I said, the standby counsel.
[48:34.000 --> 48:38.000]  Ted, Ted Scarlett, where are you?
[48:38.000 --> 48:41.000]  Ted Scarlett's the guy you need to talk to.
[48:41.000 --> 48:44.000]  He's been suing his own counsel for a long time.
[48:44.000 --> 48:47.000]  The first thing you do is bargain the crap out of both lawyers.
[48:47.000 --> 48:53.000]  The one you fired, you need to send a tort letter to the one you fired,
[48:53.000 --> 49:05.000]  notice of intent to sue for lack of ineffective assistance counsel.
[49:05.000 --> 49:16.000]  And okay, the court appointed this lawyer, this second lawyer, without your request for one?
[49:16.000 --> 49:18.000]  That is correct.
[49:18.000 --> 49:22.000]  Oh, have you filed criminally against the judge yet?
[49:22.000 --> 49:23.000]  No, I haven't.
[49:23.000 --> 49:26.000]  That's the whole point of asking the question,
[49:26.000 --> 49:30.000]  because what I was going to say in regards to a judicial complaint,
[49:30.000 --> 49:35.000]  that's the one remedy that I'm familiar with, at least I've heard of
[49:35.000 --> 49:41.000]  and I was just going to ask in this situation the effectiveness of that
[49:41.000 --> 49:46.000]  or even if that's the tool to use.
[49:46.000 --> 49:54.000]  Before we go any farther, what is the nature of your case?
[49:54.000 --> 49:59.000]  It's dealing with taxation.
[49:59.000 --> 50:01.000]  Like IRS or state?
[50:01.000 --> 50:03.000]  Yes, yes.
[50:03.000 --> 50:05.000]  No, no, no, that was either or.
[50:05.000 --> 50:08.000]  IRS or state or both?
[50:08.000 --> 50:11.000]  I'm sorry, no, it's IRS, I'm sorry.
[50:11.000 --> 50:14.000]  Oh, okay.
[50:14.000 --> 50:18.000]  First thing you need to do is talk to David Lewis.
[50:18.000 --> 50:24.000]  Did the IRS send you a, what do they call it Brad?
[50:24.000 --> 50:26.000]  Notice of deficiency?
[50:26.000 --> 50:30.000]  No, no, an assessment?
[50:30.000 --> 50:32.000]  No.
[50:32.000 --> 50:37.000]  Send a letter to the IRS and ask them to request an assessment.
[50:37.000 --> 50:40.000]  See in the code, they're required to give you an assessment.
[50:40.000 --> 50:45.000]  What they do is they ask you to do your own assessment.
[50:45.000 --> 50:49.000]  But when you ask them for an assessment, you tend to never hear from them again.
[50:49.000 --> 50:55.000]  Okay, that, next thing is talk to David Lewis.
[50:55.000 --> 51:03.000]  He's been doing this show for 15 years and he's the only tax guy I've referenced.
[51:03.000 --> 51:06.000]  He will show you some tricks.
[51:06.000 --> 51:14.000]  Is this a state court, federal court or IRS tax court that you're in?
[51:14.000 --> 51:16.000]  Federal.
[51:16.000 --> 51:21.000]  Okay, because the IRS tax court is not a court.
[51:21.000 --> 51:26.000]  They named it court, but it's not a court, it's just administrative hearing.
[51:26.000 --> 51:29.000]  They want you to think it's a court.
[51:29.000 --> 51:33.000]  So this is a federal judge.
[51:33.000 --> 51:41.000]  Okay, there's something we're not getting because I've helped a lot of people file federal actions in court,
[51:41.000 --> 51:44.000]  I filed my own and they never required me to have an attorney.
[51:44.000 --> 51:50.000]  Why are they insisting you have an attorney?
[51:50.000 --> 51:57.000]  That's the question that I don't have an answer for other than to just tell you that one of the hearing
[51:57.000 --> 52:05.000]  that we did have when this was after I had fired the attorney,
[52:05.000 --> 52:09.000]  I can just say that the judge for some reason just seemed really upset.
[52:09.000 --> 52:16.000]  He was telling me basically, that's not your job, that's my job to do something like that.
[52:16.000 --> 52:21.000]  So again, which I know that that's wrong and everything.
[52:21.000 --> 52:28.000]  Okay, when the judge starts doing that, they have a pat response, especially to federal judges.
[52:28.000 --> 52:38.000]  You just tell the judge, if he'll bend over, you'll pull that wild hair out of his behind for him.
[52:38.000 --> 52:39.000]  No?
[52:39.000 --> 52:40.000]  Okay.
[52:40.000 --> 52:41.000]  It was just a thought.
[52:41.000 --> 52:47.000]  I've never done that to a federal judge, but I'd like to watch somebody else do it.
[52:47.000 --> 52:56.000]  Okay, maybe not, but something strikes me here.
[52:56.000 --> 53:10.000]  On this channel, we are on this station, we talk to people who are generally upset or not happy with the legal system.
[53:10.000 --> 53:17.000]  And they call in to find out how they can protect themselves from bad behavior.
[53:17.000 --> 53:25.000]  Sometimes, especially in the federal court, what they're complaining about is not always bad behavior.
[53:25.000 --> 53:29.000]  When you're in the federal court, you need to watch them real carefully.
[53:29.000 --> 53:32.000]  Do you have any rulings by the judge?
[53:32.000 --> 53:35.000]  No.
[53:35.000 --> 53:50.000]  Because generally, the federal judges and generally the federal courts tend to give a lot of deference to proceeds litigants.
[53:50.000 --> 53:59.000]  So if the judge is trying to force a lawyer on you, why?
[53:59.000 --> 54:05.000]  Was the first lawyer a lawyer of your choosing?
[54:05.000 --> 54:10.000]  He was of my choosing, yes.
[54:10.000 --> 54:15.000]  Why did you fire him?
[54:15.000 --> 54:19.000]  Okay, let me take a step back and tell you why I'm asking you that.
[54:19.000 --> 54:27.000]  Most people, you know, they come on the show and they all talk about the judges as if they're all dirty rotten scoundrels.
[54:27.000 --> 54:34.000]  And I understand that as I've had a dirty rotten scoundrel or two.
[54:34.000 --> 54:38.000]  Judge Winkle in Austin, if you're listening, you're one of those.
[54:38.000 --> 54:43.000]  And Judge McBride, if he's still on the bench, he's another one of those.
[54:43.000 --> 54:50.000]  But for the most part, these higher level judges aren't like traffic court judges.
[54:50.000 --> 54:55.000]  They tend to be more straightforward and they tend to follow law.
[54:55.000 --> 55:03.000]  If the judge is ordering you to have an attorney, you might take a step back.
[55:03.000 --> 55:08.000]  And before you automatically assume that the judge is the bad guy here,
[55:08.000 --> 55:21.000]  it may be that the judge has concerns about you being able to achieve remedy without an attorney.
[55:21.000 --> 55:31.000]  What did your counsel do to give you cause to fire him or her?
[55:31.000 --> 55:36.000]  I mean, it wasn't any one particular incident or another.
[55:36.000 --> 55:39.000]  It was really just over the course of time.
[55:39.000 --> 55:47.000]  I mean, basically what was said earlier, ineffective assistance of counsel, I think is how it was said.
[55:47.000 --> 55:48.000]  Yes.
[55:48.000 --> 55:54.000]  It really is. I mean, so it just came down to everything from, for example,
[55:54.000 --> 56:00.000]  I remember asking the attorney to file something for me to the case.
[56:00.000 --> 56:07.000]  They didn't do it, wouldn't give me an explanation as to why they wouldn't do it.
[56:07.000 --> 56:09.000]  Okay. Hold on.
[56:09.000 --> 56:19.000]  Once you hire an attorney, very few attorneys will allow the litigant to file a document in the case
[56:19.000 --> 56:23.000]  that the attorney then has to adjudicate.
[56:23.000 --> 56:24.000]  That makes them crazy.
[56:24.000 --> 56:26.000]  They don't like that.
[56:26.000 --> 56:33.000]  Yeah. And we have some where I've got some documents that I've given to people
[56:33.000 --> 56:37.000]  and the lawyers look at them and they don't even understand them.
[56:37.000 --> 56:43.000]  Generally, a lawyer, if he gets into a case and an issue comes up he's not familiar with,
[56:43.000 --> 56:50.000]  he will try to find a lawyer who is familiar with it and bring that lawyer in.
[56:50.000 --> 56:59.000]  If a lawyer misargues something in the court, that can cost him his bar card.
[56:59.000 --> 57:08.000]  So we pick on judges of all people to talk about this and we're the ones who show people
[57:08.000 --> 57:16.000]  how to go after judges and prosecutors and lawyers and how to generally beat up public officials.
[57:16.000 --> 57:22.000]  But it may not always be the best methodology.
[57:22.000 --> 57:31.000]  How serious is this tax issue to your future?
[57:31.000 --> 57:39.000]  Well, I mean, certainly enough to call you up and get your take.
[57:39.000 --> 57:45.000]  Okay. Here, sometimes I get people call in, they ask me for advice.
[57:45.000 --> 57:48.000]  I can tell you how to beat them up.
[57:48.000 --> 57:53.000]  Sometimes I can tell you how to beat them up big time.
[57:53.000 --> 57:57.000]  But we owe it to be careful.
[57:57.000 --> 58:00.000]  You know, I like the idea of you beating up judges,
[58:00.000 --> 58:08.000]  but to send you out to beat up a judge that may put you in tax prison,
[58:08.000 --> 58:11.000]  I'm going to be real careful about that.
[58:11.000 --> 58:15.000]  I want to be sure that the judge is a bad guy.
[58:15.000 --> 58:18.000]  He may not be. You may not be understanding.
[58:18.000 --> 58:24.000]  Every time he renders a ruling in the federal court, they also provide a judgment.
[58:24.000 --> 58:29.000]  And a judgment is effectively findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[58:29.000 --> 58:35.000]  They tend to be much more careful than lower courts.
[58:35.000 --> 58:40.000]  There's another way to say, he'll tell you why he ruled the way he did.
[58:40.000 --> 58:44.000]  Exactly. And you should pay close attention to that.
[58:44.000 --> 58:46.000]  Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side.
[58:46.000 --> 58:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 58:57.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.000 --> 59:01.000]  and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:10.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:10.000 --> 59:13.000]  that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:21.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.000 --> 59:24.000]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.000 --> 59:27.000]  growing in Christ and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:30.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version
[59:30.000 --> 59:33.000]  and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.000 --> 59:40.000]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:44.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.000 --> 59:49.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.000 --> 59:59.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:09.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect,
[01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:11.000]  our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:17.000]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass,
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  in the name of security.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:01.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:01.000 --> 01:03:29.000]  MUSIC
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:42.040]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, and we are talking to Lance
[01:03:42.040 --> 01:03:51.520]  in Ohio, and everybody else who's listening probably perked their ears up with what I
[01:03:51.520 --> 01:03:58.680]  said to you, because generally my most fun thing to do is ask a bailiff to arrest a judge
[01:03:58.680 --> 01:03:59.680]  in the courtroom.
[01:03:59.680 --> 01:04:09.800]  Now, I go after these guys, but I pick my fights very carefully.
[01:04:09.800 --> 01:04:19.720]  If your liberty or your fortune is at stake, then I suggest we be extremely careful.
[01:04:19.720 --> 01:04:28.000]  And the fact that the judge is so against you representing yourself threw up some red
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:31.080]  flags for me.
[01:04:31.080 --> 01:04:35.440]  Lance, what kinds of...
[01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:40.160]  You had a motion you wanted the lawyer to file where you give me an idea of what the
[01:04:40.160 --> 01:04:46.120]  nature of that motion of pleading was.
[01:04:46.120 --> 01:04:57.360]  My objections to the case basically is what it was.
[01:04:57.360 --> 01:05:02.080]  The nature of the objections?
[01:05:02.080 --> 01:05:09.880]  Objection to the case itself, the proceedings, I mean, the prosecutor, et cetera, and like
[01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:20.680]  I said, the former attorney, of course, like I said, didn't file and did not even comment
[01:05:20.680 --> 01:05:25.920]  or even explain the reasoning why at the time.
[01:05:25.920 --> 01:05:31.960]  Let me explain why I asked that question that way.
[01:05:31.960 --> 01:05:44.600]  We have a lot of people out here preaching what Brett and I call patriot mythology stuff.
[01:05:44.600 --> 01:05:54.360]  They have you do things that I honestly believe this was started by the feds and kind of in
[01:05:54.360 --> 01:06:00.960]  tune with Rockefeller's notion that we keep the public chasing their tails and going after
[01:06:00.960 --> 01:06:04.920]  issues we don't care about so we can pretty well do anything we want to.
[01:06:04.920 --> 01:06:13.160]  There's a lot of patriot stuff out there that will get you put in prison.
[01:06:13.160 --> 01:06:22.280]  This man on the land stuff and the idea that you can live in this country and not be subjected
[01:06:22.280 --> 01:06:29.800]  to the laws, that they don't apply to you, that what is some of the others, Brett's status,
[01:06:29.800 --> 01:06:33.320]  you can adjust your status so you get outside the reach of the laws.
[01:06:33.320 --> 01:06:37.880]  They talk about redemption and correcting your status.
[01:06:37.880 --> 01:06:45.320]  This has got so many people put in jail and doesn't matter, you know, I do a show with
[01:06:45.320 --> 01:06:52.640]  Pastor Massad every Monday and he has hosted most of these patriot guys and he told me
[01:06:52.640 --> 01:07:00.920]  once, you know, he started Sam Kennedy, Winston Shroud, I don't remember all the others, there's
[01:07:00.920 --> 01:07:08.360]  a whole stack of them and he told me that he had never encountered anyone who had achieved
[01:07:08.360 --> 01:07:14.320]  remedy using these techniques and he was frustrated about it.
[01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:19.080]  I'm frustrated with it because it reads your stuff and it sounds good but then when I dig
[01:07:19.080 --> 01:07:24.120]  into it, I find all the case laws garbage.
[01:07:24.120 --> 01:07:29.240]  So I'm wondering who put this together and that's what caused me to wonder why the judge
[01:07:29.240 --> 01:07:33.800]  was so concerned.
[01:07:33.800 --> 01:07:42.080]  If you're not using the patriot mythology, if you're following the code and using their
[01:07:42.080 --> 01:07:49.880]  laws the way they use their laws, then we got lots of tools.
[01:07:49.880 --> 01:07:54.240]  Your lawyer is a low-hanging fruit.
[01:07:54.240 --> 01:08:01.960]  The lawyer the court is forcing on you is especially vulnerable.
[01:08:01.960 --> 01:08:06.680]  You can sue him because you have a right to counsel of your choice.
[01:08:06.680 --> 01:08:12.520]  If you didn't choose this lawyer, then this lawyer has no business interfering with your
[01:08:12.520 --> 01:08:13.520]  case.
[01:08:13.520 --> 01:08:19.240]  You can sue him directly.
[01:08:19.240 --> 01:08:20.240]  Am I making sense?
[01:08:20.240 --> 01:08:21.240]  Yes.
[01:08:21.240 --> 01:08:22.240]  Okay.
[01:08:22.240 --> 01:08:23.240]  Yes.
[01:08:23.240 --> 01:08:26.240]  Thank you for that.
[01:08:26.240 --> 01:08:33.400]  I don't do this often but I got a real bad vibe here because the judge was pushing you
[01:08:33.400 --> 01:08:35.240]  so hard to have counsel.
[01:08:35.240 --> 01:08:41.680]  I got the impression he was seeing something that made him uncomfortable and there is a
[01:08:41.680 --> 01:08:45.360]  notion out there that all the judges are no good lying criminals.
[01:08:45.360 --> 01:08:47.480]  Well, maybe they are.
[01:08:47.480 --> 01:08:51.240]  If you're in a foreclosure issue, all the judges, especially federal judges have bought
[01:08:51.240 --> 01:08:56.280]  and paid for but this is tax court.
[01:08:56.280 --> 01:09:02.400]  The judges really don't have a dog in that hunt.
[01:09:02.400 --> 01:09:09.480]  So what has the judge done that other than a point you counseled you didn't ask for?
[01:09:09.480 --> 01:09:14.480]  Brett, have you ever heard of that other than Lance, I mean Ted Scarlett?
[01:09:14.480 --> 01:09:15.480]  Ted, yeah.
[01:09:15.480 --> 01:09:19.440]  They pushed it on Ted but not usually, no.
[01:09:19.440 --> 01:09:27.160]  That was a state court in California and California is by far the most corrupt state.
[01:09:27.160 --> 01:09:35.000]  They were trying to railroad him because he caught them cheating.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:41.040]  But this is the first time I've heard of a federal judge forcing a lawyer on a client
[01:09:41.040 --> 01:09:44.040]  or on a litigant.
[01:09:44.040 --> 01:09:48.960]  Do you understand why I'm concerned?
[01:09:48.960 --> 01:09:50.960]  Yes.
[01:09:50.960 --> 01:09:58.720]  With that said, you can certainly file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge for denying
[01:09:58.720 --> 01:10:03.280]  you and your right to counsel of your choice.
[01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:08.120]  The fact that you have the right to counsel of your choice gives you the right to use
[01:10:08.120 --> 01:10:19.240]  yourself as counsel of your choice and it would appear he's denying you in that right.
[01:10:19.240 --> 01:10:21.440]  Can we talk about this off the air?
[01:10:21.440 --> 01:10:22.440]  Sure.
[01:10:22.440 --> 01:10:23.440]  Sure.
[01:10:23.440 --> 01:10:24.440]  Okay.
[01:10:24.440 --> 01:10:25.440]  Send me an email.
[01:10:25.440 --> 01:10:26.440]  Do you have my email?
[01:10:26.440 --> 01:10:29.640]  I can find it off the website.
[01:10:29.640 --> 01:10:30.640]  Yeah.
[01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:31.640]  It's randyatrouvaloradio.com.
[01:10:31.640 --> 01:10:35.840]  Let's talk about this off the air.
[01:10:35.840 --> 01:10:41.720]  I'm going to ask you some questions that's likely to piss you off big time.
[01:10:41.720 --> 01:10:47.120]  But when I'm comfortable that you're in the right place, I will show you how to give them
[01:10:47.120 --> 01:10:49.440]  a walk through the legal system.
[01:10:49.440 --> 01:10:51.440]  They will not believe.
[01:10:51.440 --> 01:10:52.440]  Okay.
[01:10:52.440 --> 01:10:53.440]  Okay.
[01:10:53.440 --> 01:10:54.440]  Yes.
[01:10:54.440 --> 01:10:57.040]  I'll send that email.
[01:10:57.040 --> 01:10:58.480]  Thank you very much.
[01:10:58.480 --> 01:10:59.480]  Thank you.
[01:10:59.480 --> 01:11:00.480]  Okay.
[01:11:00.480 --> 01:11:05.040]  Now, we're going to Jack in Texas.
[01:11:05.040 --> 01:11:07.520]  Hold on.
[01:11:07.520 --> 01:11:15.440]  We've got John in New York and we've only got Jack and John, but we've only got an hour
[01:11:15.440 --> 01:11:18.200]  left, so we may not get to you, John.
[01:11:18.200 --> 01:11:20.880]  We did have another first time caller.
[01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:21.880]  I don't know what happened.
[01:11:21.880 --> 01:11:23.960]  Another first time caller dropped off.
[01:11:23.960 --> 01:11:24.960]  Wait a minute.
[01:11:24.960 --> 01:11:27.360]  I'm jerking John's chain here.
[01:11:27.360 --> 01:11:28.360]  Yeah.
[01:11:28.360 --> 01:11:29.360]  Yeah.
[01:11:29.360 --> 01:11:34.680]  We didn't get to you last night, but we've only got an hour left, so we might not get
[01:11:34.680 --> 01:11:35.680]  to you tonight.
[01:11:35.680 --> 01:11:38.000]  Oh, our first time caller just come back.
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:39.800]  Oh, okay.
[01:11:39.800 --> 01:11:40.800]  Okay.
[01:11:40.800 --> 01:11:42.880]  We'll get to you, John.
[01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:43.880]  Don't worry about it.
[01:11:43.880 --> 01:11:51.480]  We had five callers on the board yesterday and we had one segment and three callers left.
[01:11:51.480 --> 01:11:57.880]  I got through two more than we thought we would, but we didn't get to you, and you really
[01:11:57.880 --> 01:12:00.280]  were the last one on the board.
[01:12:00.280 --> 01:12:01.280]  Okay.
[01:12:01.280 --> 01:12:02.280]  Okay.
[01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:03.280]  Yeah, usually.
[01:12:03.280 --> 01:12:04.280]  Hang on, John.
[01:12:04.280 --> 01:12:05.280]  We'll get to you.
[01:12:05.280 --> 01:12:06.280]  Okay.
[01:12:06.280 --> 01:12:07.280]  Okay.
[01:12:07.280 --> 01:12:14.080]  Okay, we pick on John a lot here, but we have fun at his expense.
[01:12:14.080 --> 01:12:19.120]  Okay, Jack, where were we?
[01:12:19.120 --> 01:12:21.760]  What do you have for us today?
[01:12:21.760 --> 01:12:22.760]  Not the new guy?
[01:12:22.760 --> 01:12:23.760]  No.
[01:12:23.760 --> 01:12:24.760]  Oh, yeah.
[01:12:24.760 --> 01:12:25.760]  Yeah, hang on.
[01:12:25.760 --> 01:12:32.000]  Let me take the new guy first, but he came on after I clicked you, but you, Jimmy, don't
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:34.280]  take a long time, so it'll probably be okay.
[01:12:34.280 --> 01:12:35.280]  All right.
[01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:36.280]  There's no problem.
[01:12:36.280 --> 01:12:37.280]  Pick the new guy.
[01:12:37.280 --> 01:12:38.280]  Okay.
[01:12:38.280 --> 01:12:39.280]  What do you have for us?
[01:12:39.280 --> 01:12:40.280]  Okay.
[01:12:40.280 --> 01:12:41.280]  Well, this is about the traffic tickets.
[01:12:41.280 --> 01:12:42.280]  So, the court date, which I thought was going to be last month, it was just one of those
[01:12:42.280 --> 01:12:43.280]  deals where they offer you a deal, and I refused to-
[01:12:43.280 --> 01:12:44.280]  Okay.
[01:12:44.280 --> 01:12:45.280]  Hold on.
[01:12:45.280 --> 01:12:46.280]  Hold on.
[01:12:46.280 --> 01:12:47.280]  That is interesting.
[01:12:47.280 --> 01:12:48.280]  Offer you a deal.
[01:12:48.280 --> 01:12:49.280]  Are you familiar with 2016?
[01:12:49.280 --> 01:13:08.280]  Are you familiar with 26.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure?
[01:13:08.280 --> 01:13:09.280]  No.
[01:13:09.280 --> 01:13:10.280]  Yeah.
[01:13:10.280 --> 01:13:17.760]  They sent you a notice to come to court.
[01:13:17.760 --> 01:13:20.760]  Did they tell you why you were ordered to court?
[01:13:20.760 --> 01:13:21.760]  Yeah.
[01:13:21.760 --> 01:13:22.760]  It was a court date.
[01:13:22.760 --> 01:13:23.760]  I was supposed to be on the court.
[01:13:23.760 --> 01:13:24.760]  Well, that's not good enough.
[01:13:24.760 --> 01:13:25.760]  Trial?
[01:13:25.760 --> 01:13:26.760]  Was it a trial?
[01:13:26.760 --> 01:13:27.760]  Pre-trial?
[01:13:27.760 --> 01:13:28.760]  What did they say?
[01:13:28.760 --> 01:13:29.760]  Arraignment?
[01:13:29.760 --> 01:13:30.760]  I believe it was a trial date.
[01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:31.760]  I mean-
[01:13:31.760 --> 01:13:32.760]  Okay.
[01:13:32.760 --> 01:13:49.200]  26.01, I'm sorry, 28.01, lists all of the things the court can order you into court
[01:13:49.200 --> 01:13:50.200]  for.
[01:13:50.200 --> 01:13:55.400]  The first one is an arraignment.
[01:13:55.400 --> 01:14:03.120]  Second one is a trial on the merits, and all the rest go to motions or pleadings before
[01:14:03.120 --> 01:14:04.120]  the court.
[01:14:04.120 --> 01:14:07.200]  Did you have motions or pleadings before the court?
[01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:08.200]  Yes.
[01:14:08.200 --> 01:14:17.320]  I have all of yours that they flipped out over and called you names and called it all
[01:14:17.320 --> 01:14:18.320]  the-
[01:14:18.320 --> 01:14:19.320]  Yes.
[01:14:19.320 --> 01:14:22.600]  At this hearing, did they hear any of those motions or pleadings?
[01:14:22.600 --> 01:14:29.120]  No, no, it was a previous hearing that they did all the rumblings.
[01:14:29.120 --> 01:14:32.400]  Oh, so they were all ruled on?
[01:14:32.400 --> 01:14:33.400]  Yes.
[01:14:33.400 --> 01:14:35.400]  They were all-
[01:14:35.400 --> 01:14:38.600]  So you had no outstanding motions before the court?
[01:14:38.600 --> 01:14:39.600]  No.
[01:14:39.600 --> 01:14:49.920]  I had a request for admissions, I think that's it right now.
[01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:53.560]  So did they hear that request for admissions?
[01:14:53.560 --> 01:14:54.560]  No.
[01:14:54.560 --> 01:14:57.560]  Okay, here's the problem.
[01:14:57.560 --> 01:15:05.760]  The very day of the trial, but I haven't had a response, it's been more than 30 days.
[01:15:05.760 --> 01:15:08.640]  Okay, so they ordered you to court.
[01:15:08.640 --> 01:15:13.960]  They can only order you to court for a trial on the merits or for motions or pleadings
[01:15:13.960 --> 01:15:17.400]  or for an arraignment or motions or pleadings before the court.
[01:15:17.400 --> 01:15:25.560]  But in this case, it's a Class C misdemeanor and 2601 says, an arraignment may be held
[01:15:25.560 --> 01:15:34.040]  in the matter of a felony or a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment.
[01:15:34.040 --> 01:15:41.000]  Class C misdemeanors in Texas are specifically excluded from an arraignment.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:51.560]  So they ordered you to court to meet with the prosecutor and play, let's make a deal.
[01:15:51.560 --> 01:15:54.680]  Am I getting that right?
[01:15:54.680 --> 01:15:59.560]  Oh, hold on, somehow you got muted.
[01:15:59.560 --> 01:16:07.040]  Okay, I'm sorry, go- no, oh, Jack's on the- he dropped off and he's back, okay.
[01:16:07.040 --> 01:16:10.040]  There we go.
[01:16:10.040 --> 01:16:11.040]  Are you back, Jack?
[01:16:11.040 --> 01:16:15.760]  Yes, I dropped off for a little bit, but I called right back.
[01:16:15.760 --> 01:16:16.760]  Okay.
[01:16:16.760 --> 01:16:18.760]  Did you get my question?
[01:16:18.760 --> 01:16:23.720]  No, go- I'll go back over it.
[01:16:23.720 --> 01:16:30.120]  They ordered you into court and you didn't have any active motions before the court.
[01:16:30.120 --> 01:16:37.000]  Under 2601, they cannot order you to court for an arraignment hearing in a Class C misdemeanor.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.440]  So they ordered you to court so you could meet with the prosecutor.
[01:16:40.440 --> 01:16:41.440]  Yeah.
[01:16:41.440 --> 01:16:48.920]  If the prosecutor wants to meet with me, he can call my secretary and make an appointment.
[01:16:48.920 --> 01:16:50.800]  Doesn't get to order me into court.
[01:16:50.800 --> 01:16:57.680]  That's simulating a legal process, 32 point- what is it, Brett?
[01:16:57.680 --> 01:17:00.200]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:09.040]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.040 --> 01:17:13.360]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:17:13.360 --> 01:17:14.680]  can win two.
[01:17:14.680 --> 01:17:19.320]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.320 --> 01:17:24.960]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:24.960 --> 01:17:29.600]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn your
[01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:33.800]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.800 --> 01:17:38.600]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.600 --> 01:17:40.760]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.760 --> 01:17:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:49.560]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:58.560]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.560 --> 01:18:00.240]  collectors now.
[01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:01.240]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.240 --> 01:18:04.520]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:07.440]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.440 --> 01:18:08.440]  I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.440 --> 01:18:13.320]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.320 --> 01:18:17.080]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.080 --> 01:18:20.480]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.480 --> 01:18:21.840]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:23.840]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:28.440]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos by ordering your supplies or
[01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:29.440]  holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.440 --> 01:18:31.520]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.520 --> 01:18:37.680]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.680 --> 01:18:43.520]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.520 --> 01:18:44.520]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.520 --> 01:18:45.520]  No.
[01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:47.040]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.040 --> 01:18:48.040]  No.
[01:18:48.040 --> 01:18:49.040]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.040 --> 01:18:50.040]  No.
[01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:51.040]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.040 --> 01:18:52.040]  Wow.
[01:18:52.040 --> 01:18:56.000]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  You're welcome.
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:47.520]  If I can't get everything I want, yeah, I need to get a range, yeah, hey, if I can't
[01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:58.240]  get everything I need, yeah, I need to get a range, yeah, hey.
[01:19:58.240 --> 01:19:59.240]  Okay.
[01:19:59.240 --> 01:20:00.240]  We are back.
[01:20:00.240 --> 01:20:06.880]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio on this Friday, the 18th day of November 2022.
[01:20:06.880 --> 01:20:10.120]  And we're talking to Jack in Texas.
[01:20:10.120 --> 01:20:18.080]  And my point is, is they ordered you to come to court to meet with the prosecutor.
[01:20:18.080 --> 01:20:21.640]  There's a lot of things they can order you to court for.
[01:20:21.640 --> 01:20:24.600]  That is not one of them.
[01:20:24.600 --> 01:20:33.120]  That is simulating a legal process violation of 30, 32 point, what, Brett, 48?
[01:20:33.120 --> 01:20:38.640]  Yeah, I think it's 32, 40, penal code.
[01:20:38.640 --> 01:20:43.560]  There's the prosecutor with it.
[01:20:43.560 --> 01:20:53.040]  When I go into a traffic court, I don't talk to prosecutors, period.
[01:20:53.040 --> 01:20:58.440]  In Highland Park, they sent me over to talk to the prosecutor.
[01:20:58.440 --> 01:20:59.720]  He said, are you Mr. Kelton?
[01:20:59.720 --> 01:21:05.040]  I said, yes, I am, but you probably don't want to talk to me.
[01:21:05.040 --> 01:21:06.040]  He said, I don't?
[01:21:06.040 --> 01:21:07.400]  I said, no, no, you do.
[01:21:07.400 --> 01:21:08.880]  I'm not here to talk to you.
[01:21:08.880 --> 01:21:10.800]  He said, well, who are you to talk to?
[01:21:10.800 --> 01:21:12.160]  I'm here to talk to the judge.
[01:21:12.160 --> 01:21:14.320]  He said, okay, go stand in that line.
[01:21:14.320 --> 01:21:16.760]  But this guy was smart.
[01:21:16.760 --> 01:21:19.880]  He didn't try to play hardball with me.
[01:21:19.880 --> 01:21:25.620]  South Lake, Texas, I went with a guy who was a truck driver and a friend of mine called
[01:21:25.620 --> 01:21:29.400]  him, was his boss, and asked me to go with him.
[01:21:29.400 --> 01:21:34.480]  And they got 58 people in there, no judge, they're calling them, the lawyer's calling
[01:21:34.480 --> 01:21:35.480]  them into the office.
[01:21:35.480 --> 01:21:42.960]  This is a female lawyer her first day, like 25, 26 years old.
[01:21:42.960 --> 01:21:46.840]  So they call this guy and he starts to go back there and I get up with him and the bailiff
[01:21:46.840 --> 01:21:47.840]  said, sir.
[01:21:47.840 --> 01:21:51.000]  He said, Mr. Kelton, he knew who I was.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  You can't go back there.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:53.720]  I said, sure I can.
[01:21:53.720 --> 01:21:54.720]  I'm his paralegal.
[01:21:54.720 --> 01:21:59.280]  I said, oh no, only the accused can go back there.
[01:21:59.280 --> 01:22:02.160]  I said, is the judge back there?
[01:22:02.160 --> 01:22:05.200]  He said, well, no, but where's the judge?
[01:22:05.200 --> 01:22:08.120]  Well, he's not here today.
[01:22:08.120 --> 01:22:12.640]  I need you to arrest the prosecutor.
[01:22:12.640 --> 01:22:17.840]  I need to go talk to my boss.
[01:22:17.840 --> 01:22:21.620]  The prosecutor had simulated a legal process.
[01:22:21.620 --> 01:22:29.480]  He subpoenaed these people to come to court to have a meeting with him.
[01:22:29.480 --> 01:22:31.480]  You can't do that.
[01:22:31.480 --> 01:22:38.320]  If he wants to be with me, he can call my secretary and set an appointment just like
[01:22:38.320 --> 01:22:39.320]  anybody else.
[01:22:39.320 --> 01:22:42.320]  You see my point, Jack?
[01:22:42.320 --> 01:22:45.120]  Yes, sir.
[01:22:45.120 --> 01:22:48.760]  Charge him with simulating the legal process.
[01:22:48.760 --> 01:22:51.320]  I take it you didn't make a deal with him?
[01:22:51.320 --> 01:22:53.360]  Oh no.
[01:22:53.360 --> 01:22:59.840]  Oh, you're such a hard man.
[01:22:59.840 --> 01:23:02.360]  You didn't want to empty your pockets for him.
[01:23:02.360 --> 01:23:03.360]  Okay.
[01:23:03.360 --> 01:23:07.840]  I'm not sure if I addressed your question, but that was just an issue I had.
[01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:08.840]  Okay.
[01:23:08.840 --> 01:23:10.840]  You go ahead and ask your question.
[01:23:10.840 --> 01:23:11.840]  Okay.
[01:23:11.840 --> 01:23:19.120]  Well, they have never responded to any of my pleadings or motions or whatever.
[01:23:19.120 --> 01:23:22.360]  So I turned in this request for admission.
[01:23:22.360 --> 01:23:24.720]  I believe it.
[01:23:24.720 --> 01:23:27.200]  They had 30 days to respond.
[01:23:27.200 --> 01:23:30.400]  I got no response so far.
[01:23:30.400 --> 01:23:31.400]  Okay.
[01:23:31.400 --> 01:23:42.160]  Your next step here is to file for, request the court to order discovery.
[01:23:42.160 --> 01:23:46.960]  But in Class C misdemeanors, they have denied you and your right to discovery.
[01:23:46.960 --> 01:24:00.080]  Well now, see the prosecutor did mention the clerk to give me discovery, but I mean, I
[01:24:00.080 --> 01:24:01.560]  don't know what the heck that would be involved.
[01:24:01.560 --> 01:24:04.560]  Well, look up the Michael Morton Act.
[01:24:04.560 --> 01:24:06.560]  I haven't gotten anything.
[01:24:06.560 --> 01:24:07.560]  I'm sorry?
[01:24:07.560 --> 01:24:12.040]  The Michael Morton Act in Texas, I forget the number on it.
[01:24:12.040 --> 01:24:13.040]  Yep.
[01:24:13.040 --> 01:24:14.040]  3914.
[01:24:14.040 --> 01:24:22.000]  Okay, that one lists all of the things the prosecutor is required to give you.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:29.880]  I was just talking to a district attorney a couple of weeks ago and he mentioned that
[01:24:29.880 --> 01:24:33.680]  that it requires us to give up everything.
[01:24:33.680 --> 01:24:39.920]  So you're required under 3914 and when they don't give it to you, that gives you great
[01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:46.200]  grounds for appeal, especially here, this could give you grounds for interlocutory.
[01:24:46.200 --> 01:24:53.280]  Well, no, this is not a dispositive ruling, so it would give you grounds for a mandamus.
[01:24:53.280 --> 01:24:54.280]  Yes.
[01:24:54.280 --> 01:25:01.440]  And in Texas, we also have, the lawyers won't tend to use this or know about it or even
[01:25:01.440 --> 01:25:09.600]  think that you should have it, but 3906 specifically says you get to do interrogatories, just like
[01:25:09.600 --> 01:25:11.660]  in civil.
[01:25:11.660 --> 01:25:24.000]  So you can send interrogatories to the other parties and witnesses and they've got to respond
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:26.120]  to you just like civil does.
[01:25:26.120 --> 01:25:31.680]  Yeah, but this is traffic under Chapter 45.
[01:25:31.680 --> 01:25:32.680]  So?
[01:25:32.680 --> 01:25:39.920]  Because 45, I think under Class C misdemeanor, you don't have a right to discovery.
[01:25:39.920 --> 01:25:42.480]  Well, I would like to see that.
[01:25:42.480 --> 01:25:47.320]  I know they like to do that, but I don't see any limits in the code for that.
[01:25:47.320 --> 01:25:52.280]  But even that, I would think the Michael Morton Act would override that.
[01:25:52.280 --> 01:25:59.640]  Well, Michael Morton Act allows the accused to have certain things and it forces them
[01:25:59.640 --> 01:26:04.200]  to give it, but 3906 adds to that.
[01:26:04.200 --> 01:26:11.200]  If Michael Morton Act orders them to give it, so there has to be some discovery.
[01:26:11.200 --> 01:26:21.400]  The only thing they're going to have is the traffic citation.
[01:26:21.400 --> 01:26:25.800]  Unless you're asking for stuff that goes to department procedures and such, what kind
[01:26:25.800 --> 01:26:30.680]  of stuff are you asking for, Jack?
[01:26:30.680 --> 01:26:31.680]  I didn't do an interrogatory.
[01:26:31.680 --> 01:26:33.680]  I did request for admissions.
[01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:45.000]  The only thing, five things I did related to the city and the police officer not having
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:49.760]  authority, no MOU.
[01:26:49.760 --> 01:26:57.240]  Have you filed my subject matter jurisdiction challenge for traffic?
[01:26:57.240 --> 01:26:58.240]  That was ignored totally.
[01:26:58.240 --> 01:26:59.240]  It was BS.
[01:26:59.240 --> 01:27:00.240]  Oh, no.
[01:27:00.240 --> 01:27:08.440]  It was BS at first, but then he looked at it and he said, oh, I have jurisdiction because
[01:27:08.440 --> 01:27:09.440]  I have jurisdiction.
[01:27:09.440 --> 01:27:10.440]  Out of the court.
[01:27:10.440 --> 01:27:11.440]  Oh, that's right.
[01:27:11.440 --> 01:27:12.440]  That should give a mandamus.
[01:27:12.440 --> 01:27:13.440]  Oh, here we go.
[01:27:13.440 --> 01:27:14.440]  There's Ted.
[01:27:14.440 --> 01:27:26.680]  Okay, who needed, Chris needed Ted.
[01:27:26.680 --> 01:27:29.680]  Who needed Ted?
[01:27:29.680 --> 01:27:38.080]  Travis Lance was the previous owner, had that in common with Ted with being pushed, having
[01:27:38.080 --> 01:27:41.800]  a prosecutor, I mean attorney pushed on him.
[01:27:41.800 --> 01:27:42.800]  Oh, okay.
[01:27:42.800 --> 01:27:44.960]  Okay, okay, back to Jack.
[01:27:44.960 --> 01:27:47.960]  We keep interrupting you.
[01:27:47.960 --> 01:27:53.480]  Okay, so your issue is discovery.
[01:27:53.480 --> 01:27:59.840]  My issue is, well, I'm not sure what they can give you for discovery.
[01:27:59.840 --> 01:28:02.040]  I mean, there isn't much to it.
[01:28:02.040 --> 01:28:06.520]  My issue, my first question is, what do I do about the request for admissions that they've
[01:28:06.520 --> 01:28:09.200]  never responded to and it's been more than 30 days?
[01:28:09.200 --> 01:28:15.960]  Okay, you file a motion to compel.
[01:28:15.960 --> 01:28:22.360]  If his motion to compel gets shut down, would a motion and limiting be appropriate?
[01:28:22.360 --> 01:28:24.040]  Motion and limiting is something else.
[01:28:24.040 --> 01:28:33.000]  Yeah, but if they didn't respond to it, you've got the presumption or it says it's deemed
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:38.340]  admitted, but they're going to try to say that he doesn't get to use his admissions
[01:28:38.340 --> 01:28:44.960]  because, oh, that's only for civil, and then he's got that extra layer of something to
[01:28:44.960 --> 01:28:45.960]  argue about.
[01:28:45.960 --> 01:28:46.960]  Yeah.
[01:28:46.960 --> 01:28:48.760]  I've been to that before.
[01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:50.720]  I'm beginning to see your point.
[01:28:50.720 --> 01:28:56.480]  Motion and limiting, for those who don't know, is a list of all the questions the prosecutor
[01:28:56.480 --> 01:28:58.720]  can't ask.
[01:28:58.720 --> 01:29:05.480]  So I can see where that would be valuable if the prosecutor is likely to ask a question
[01:29:05.480 --> 01:29:10.960]  that would depend on the documentation he refused to produce.
[01:29:10.960 --> 01:29:11.960]  Right.
[01:29:11.960 --> 01:29:19.920]  So you could ask the court to forbid the prosecutor from asking questions that went for information
[01:29:19.920 --> 01:29:28.000]  the prosecutor had and failed to produce, I think.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:32.800]  But a motion and limiting is all of the questions the other side can't ask.
[01:29:32.800 --> 01:29:36.120]  I've got a big one in this, pretty fun.
[01:29:36.120 --> 01:29:37.120]  Makes them crazy.
[01:29:37.120 --> 01:29:38.120]  Okay.
[01:29:38.120 --> 01:29:39.120]  Hang on.
[01:29:39.120 --> 01:29:46.520]  We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Brutal Law Radio.
[01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:47.880]  Won't give out the call-in numbers.
[01:29:47.880 --> 01:29:52.440]  We've got the new caller back, and then we've got Jack and Ted.
[01:29:52.440 --> 01:29:55.720]  Ted, I don't think I'll get to you today.
[01:29:55.720 --> 01:29:57.640]  We're going to run out of time.
[01:29:57.640 --> 01:29:58.640]  Hang on.
[01:29:58.640 --> 01:30:01.640]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.640 --> 01:30:04.800]  The top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[01:30:04.800 --> 01:30:10.640]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic
[01:30:10.640 --> 01:30:11.640]  blackout.
[01:30:11.640 --> 01:30:16.440]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:18.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.160 --> 01:30:21.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:26.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.760 --> 01:30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:34.520]  It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.520 --> 01:30:40.120]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.120 --> 01:30:41.860]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.860 --> 01:30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:49.920]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into
[01:30:49.920 --> 01:30:52.480]  your home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.480 --> 01:30:56.680]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric
[01:30:56.680 --> 01:30:59.840]  use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.840 --> 01:31:03.320]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast.
[01:31:03.320 --> 01:31:07.840]  If we make the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field
[01:31:07.840 --> 01:31:08.840]  day.
[01:31:08.840 --> 01:31:13.820]  Working remotely, they could tap in and blackout the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to
[01:31:13.820 --> 01:31:14.820]  our enemies.
[01:31:14.820 --> 01:31:19.040]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:19.040 --> 01:31:21.920]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[01:31:21.920 --> 01:31:23.520]  There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.520 --> 01:31:31.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.460 --> 01:31:36.840]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.840 --> 01:31:39.160]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.160 --> 01:31:43.880]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.880 --> 01:31:47.880]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.880 --> 01:31:49.360]  first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:50.800]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.800 --> 01:31:51.800]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.800 --> 01:31:53.160]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:54.160]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.160 --> 01:31:55.760]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.760 --> 01:31:58.400]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.400 --> 01:32:00.400]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.400 --> 01:32:05.760]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.760 --> 01:32:09.600]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:09.600 --> 01:32:13.560]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:16.760]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:16.760 --> 01:32:20.520]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.520 --> 01:32:24.640]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.640 --> 01:32:26.080]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.080 --> 01:32:30.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:33.760]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:33.760 --> 01:32:36.160]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.160 --> 01:32:40.160]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:40.160 --> 01:32:41.480]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.480 --> 01:32:44.760]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.760 --> 01:32:49.240]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.240 --> 01:32:51.200]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:55.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.520 --> 01:33:00.600]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:00.600 --> 01:33:07.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:07.280 --> 01:33:35.560]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, we're at Fountain Rule Law Radio, and Jack, if we answered
[01:33:35.560 --> 01:33:41.880]  your question, I'm not even sure of what it was at this point, it was about discovery
[01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:52.040]  of, okay, you asked if they don't provide discovery, then you can file a motion for
[01:33:52.040 --> 01:33:54.320]  to compel, but what else did you have?
[01:33:54.320 --> 01:34:00.680]  Well, I've got a couple on it, but getting back to this request for admission, is that
[01:34:00.680 --> 01:34:03.800]  only for a civil, then, and not for a criminal?
[01:34:03.800 --> 01:34:08.640]  Yeah, that's only, as far as I know, that's only for civil, but now we're talking about
[01:34:08.640 --> 01:34:14.440]  that on the break, and he's saying, as far as he knows, there's no distinction.
[01:34:14.440 --> 01:34:20.080]  Well, the lawyers always want to say that it's only for civil, but not one lawyer has
[01:34:20.080 --> 01:34:24.200]  ever been able to produce any legal support to show that.
[01:34:24.200 --> 01:34:28.080]  Yeah, you don't want to answer the admissions.
[01:34:28.080 --> 01:34:31.560]  It's too scary for their whole case to get destroyed before they even get a chance to
[01:34:31.560 --> 01:34:34.200]  stand around and do their little skanky dance.
[01:34:34.200 --> 01:34:41.760]  So they really want to not have these admissions exist, but they have so far never been able
[01:34:41.760 --> 01:34:46.360]  to show any legal authority for that idea, they just all say it and the judge goes along
[01:34:46.360 --> 01:34:47.360]  with it.
[01:34:47.360 --> 01:34:53.120]  Yeah, the judges in municipal courts are absolutely the worst.
[01:34:53.120 --> 01:34:58.840]  They almost never get any blowback because of dealing with people who don't know law
[01:34:58.840 --> 01:35:01.960]  and they screw them at every opportunity.
[01:35:01.960 --> 01:35:12.400]  I like to set the judge up so I can stop filing criminal charges on them, but again, what
[01:35:12.400 --> 01:35:15.800]  do we have, what's your question next?
[01:35:15.800 --> 01:35:19.040]  I'll predict the answer to that one.
[01:35:19.040 --> 01:35:21.680]  Yeah, you answered that one.
[01:35:21.680 --> 01:35:23.800]  That's all right.
[01:35:23.800 --> 01:35:32.600]  Now I had turned, I turned in criminal complaints against everybody involved to a county attorney
[01:35:32.600 --> 01:35:37.400]  and he was supposed to take it to a magistrate.
[01:35:37.400 --> 01:35:46.160]  So last time- 2.05, Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:35:46.160 --> 01:35:50.000]  Go ahead, that's the one that tells you I'm supposed to do that.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  Okay.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:57.640]  So last time I talked to you, you told me to email him and ask him what magistrate he's
[01:35:57.640 --> 01:35:58.640]  turned it into.
[01:35:58.640 --> 01:35:59.640]  I got no response.
[01:35:59.640 --> 01:36:07.280]  Then you assume he didn't do it and file against him for it.
[01:36:07.280 --> 01:36:11.960]  Is this the elected DA or an assistant?
[01:36:11.960 --> 01:36:14.920]  I believe it's an assistant.
[01:36:14.920 --> 01:36:20.240]  Good, they're going to be chumps, especially in traffic court, they're going to be just
[01:36:20.240 --> 01:36:26.320]  out of law school, weren't the highest in the class so they didn't get picked up by
[01:36:26.320 --> 01:36:27.320]  a law firm.
[01:36:27.320 --> 01:36:35.120]  They're struggling to make a living and bar grieve them into the stone age.
[01:36:35.120 --> 01:36:47.640]  So my question is, how do I find out which magistrate to ask about these criminal complaints?
[01:36:47.640 --> 01:36:50.440]  You're going to have to ask them all.
[01:36:50.440 --> 01:36:51.440]  I'm sorry?
[01:36:51.440 --> 01:36:56.160]  You have to ask all the magistrates because he can give notice to any magistrate he wants
[01:36:56.160 --> 01:36:57.160]  to.
[01:36:57.160 --> 01:36:58.160]  Okay.
[01:36:58.160 --> 01:37:03.880]  So just call the clerk or send an email to the clerk?
[01:37:03.880 --> 01:37:09.840]  Yes, ask them for a case in this name and get them to say they don't have it.
[01:37:09.840 --> 01:37:17.000]  Okay, and then when they don't have it- Well, the problem with accusing him is there
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:18.480]  are a lot of magistrates in the county.
[01:37:18.480 --> 01:37:24.600]  All the judges are magistrates, all the mayors are magistrates, and especially justices of
[01:37:24.600 --> 01:37:27.720]  the pieces, that's why they were put in place.
[01:37:27.720 --> 01:37:32.600]  But it's a trick to get them all- She doesn't even know it, but she's a magistrate
[01:37:32.600 --> 01:37:35.600]  too.
[01:37:35.600 --> 01:37:39.360]  Yep, in her capacity as a recorder.
[01:37:39.360 --> 01:37:43.200]  A district and county clerk.
[01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:53.160]  All right, so I'll find the magistrate, find out that they probably didn't issue any warrants,
[01:37:53.160 --> 01:37:54.160]  right?
[01:37:54.160 --> 01:37:57.920]  Then what do I charge the magistrate with?
[01:37:57.920 --> 01:37:58.920]  Not the magistrate.
[01:37:58.920 --> 01:38:01.040]  He don't have anything to do with it yet.
[01:38:01.040 --> 01:38:04.080]  You charge the prosecutor with tampering with the government document.
[01:38:04.080 --> 01:38:11.560]  Oh, I see, because you're saying if there's no record of it, he didn't turn it in.
[01:38:11.560 --> 01:38:12.560]  Right.
[01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:13.560]  I see.
[01:38:13.560 --> 01:38:19.160]  Okay, well what if I find that he did turn it in and the magistrate did nothing?
[01:38:19.160 --> 01:38:27.000]  Then you file against the magistrate for official misconduct for denying you access to the- denying
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:33.960]  you in your first amendment right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[01:38:33.960 --> 01:38:38.320]  Is that 39.03 to me?
[01:38:38.320 --> 01:38:44.240]  39.03 is the penal code.
[01:38:44.240 --> 01:38:45.240]  Official misconduct.
[01:38:45.240 --> 01:38:48.240]  Which one would that be?
[01:38:48.240 --> 01:38:53.240]  39.03.
[01:38:53.240 --> 01:39:00.080]  Because the magistrate was ordered to issue a warrant.
[01:39:00.080 --> 01:39:09.480]  Yes, the magistrate was ordered to issue a warrant by statute 15.09.
[01:39:09.480 --> 01:39:10.480]  Okay.
[01:39:10.480 --> 01:39:14.760]  Then what about- can I judge them with obstruction of justice?
[01:39:14.760 --> 01:39:21.840]  They're protecting- protecting officials- Yes, obstruction 36.06 or shielding 38.05.
[01:39:21.840 --> 01:39:22.840]  38.05.
[01:39:22.840 --> 01:39:25.840]  That's the one I found, 38.05.
[01:39:25.840 --> 01:39:26.840]  Okay.
[01:39:26.840 --> 01:39:33.440]  Well, that gets me started then gentlemen, I sure appreciate it.
[01:39:33.440 --> 01:39:34.440]  Okay.
[01:39:34.440 --> 01:39:35.440]  Thank you, Jack.
[01:39:35.440 --> 01:39:36.440]  Okay.
[01:39:36.440 --> 01:39:44.440]  Now we're going to go to a new caller, Michelle, it looks like, in Georgia.
[01:39:44.440 --> 01:39:47.440]  Okay, there we go.
[01:39:47.440 --> 01:39:48.440]  Hello, Michelle.
[01:39:48.440 --> 01:39:52.440]  Oh, wait a minute, hold on, I got Jack again.
[01:39:52.440 --> 01:39:53.440]  Okay.
[01:39:53.440 --> 01:39:54.440]  No, I don't.
[01:39:54.440 --> 01:39:55.440]  Let's see.
[01:39:55.440 --> 01:39:58.440]  Okay, Michelle, you're open, I got it right.
[01:39:58.440 --> 01:40:01.440]  Can you hear me?
[01:40:01.440 --> 01:40:02.440]  Yes.
[01:40:02.440 --> 01:40:03.440]  Is Michelle correct?
[01:40:03.440 --> 01:40:04.440]  Well, yes.
[01:40:04.440 --> 01:40:09.440]  Old people call me Shelly, but you can call me Michelle, either one.
[01:40:09.440 --> 01:40:10.440]  All right.
[01:40:10.440 --> 01:40:11.440]  Shelly.
[01:40:11.440 --> 01:40:12.440]  Texas.
[01:40:12.440 --> 01:40:13.440]  Shelly in Texas.
[01:40:13.440 --> 01:40:14.440]  Okay.
[01:40:14.440 --> 01:40:19.440]  That's why we ask, because it comes up with a caller ID if you're not in the database,
[01:40:19.440 --> 01:40:21.440]  and we always ask to make sure it's right.
[01:40:21.440 --> 01:40:22.440]  Good.
[01:40:22.440 --> 01:40:29.440]  So you're not Michelle in Texas, you're Shelly in, I mean, Michelle in Georgia, you're Shelly
[01:40:29.440 --> 01:40:30.440]  in Texas.
[01:40:30.440 --> 01:40:31.440]  Shelly in Texas.
[01:40:31.440 --> 01:40:32.440]  Oh, 817, I knew that.
[01:40:32.440 --> 01:40:33.440]  Oh, yeah.
[01:40:33.440 --> 01:40:34.440]  What you got?
[01:40:34.440 --> 01:40:39.440]  Yeah, I just have a question.
[01:40:39.440 --> 01:40:47.440]  I am actually a power of attorney for someone that's in federal prison, and she prepared,
[01:40:47.440 --> 01:40:54.440]  we had a tort claim prepared against one of the prosecutors, and as a power of attorney,
[01:40:54.440 --> 01:40:59.440]  you know, I have signed for her several things over the past few years.
[01:40:59.440 --> 01:41:06.440]  Well, everything was prepared, we sent it in, and now the judge is saying that it is
[01:41:06.440 --> 01:41:15.440]  illegal for me to sign anything in federal court for her, especially something like that.
[01:41:15.440 --> 01:41:21.440]  So I didn't know what to do or how to handle that, because...
[01:41:21.440 --> 01:41:23.440]  What was the nature of the document?
[01:41:23.440 --> 01:41:25.440]  Was it a criminal complaint?
[01:41:25.440 --> 01:41:28.440]  No, it's not a criminal complaint.
[01:41:28.440 --> 01:41:33.440]  It's just a tort, like a, you know, civil.
[01:41:33.440 --> 01:41:35.440]  Oh, it says civil action.
[01:41:35.440 --> 01:41:48.440]  Well, it's easy enough to remedy, just send it to the inmate on the envelope to notice
[01:41:48.440 --> 01:41:56.440]  legal documents, and then ask the inmate to ask one of the jailers to verify her signature
[01:41:56.440 --> 01:41:59.440]  on the document, and then you can file it.
[01:41:59.440 --> 01:42:00.440]  Okay.
[01:42:00.440 --> 01:42:05.440]  They are required to provide her with a notary.
[01:42:05.440 --> 01:42:10.440]  The thing is, is because they're mad at me for doing paperwork for her,
[01:42:10.440 --> 01:42:15.440]  the prison won't allow her to even speak to me.
[01:42:15.440 --> 01:42:17.440]  So she's...
[01:42:17.440 --> 01:42:20.440]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:42:20.440 --> 01:42:25.440]  They can't just be mad and do that?
[01:42:25.440 --> 01:42:28.440]  Well, in this, they don't need to speak to you, just mail it to her.
[01:42:28.440 --> 01:42:31.440]  Well, they won't even let me mail anything to her.
[01:42:31.440 --> 01:42:33.440]  I can't mail anything to her.
[01:42:33.440 --> 01:42:36.440]  Well, put somebody else's name on it.
[01:42:36.440 --> 01:42:37.440]  Yeah.
[01:42:37.440 --> 01:42:39.440]  Return address.
[01:42:39.440 --> 01:42:43.440]  Yeah, they said that anything like that, they're just going to send it right back,
[01:42:43.440 --> 01:42:45.440]  and they have.
[01:42:45.440 --> 01:42:48.440]  They send it right back, and they just say...
[01:42:48.440 --> 01:42:52.440]  We've got all these remedies just to stick the mail inspectors on them,
[01:42:52.440 --> 01:42:55.440]  postal inspectors on them.
[01:42:55.440 --> 01:43:02.440]  Well, my question is, is it against the law for me to sign for her as a proper power of attorney?
[01:43:02.440 --> 01:43:06.440]  Not that I know of.
[01:43:06.440 --> 01:43:08.440]  Yeah, I didn't think so.
[01:43:08.440 --> 01:43:10.440]  He quoted some federal...
[01:43:10.440 --> 01:43:13.440]  File criminal charges against the judge.
[01:43:13.440 --> 01:43:16.440]  Okay.
[01:43:16.440 --> 01:43:21.440]  242, 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:43:21.440 --> 01:43:26.440]  Yeah, because to me, you know, if she gave me the authority to sign for her,
[01:43:26.440 --> 01:43:31.440]  I have all authority as the proper attorney, a power of attorney.
[01:43:31.440 --> 01:43:40.440]  And charge the judge with obstruction for denying the inmate
[01:43:40.440 --> 01:43:47.440]  and right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[01:43:47.440 --> 01:43:48.440]  Yeah.
[01:43:48.440 --> 01:43:51.440]  There you go.
[01:43:51.440 --> 01:43:52.440]  Hang on.
[01:43:52.440 --> 01:43:53.440]  Hang on.
[01:43:53.440 --> 01:43:54.440]  We're about to go to break.
[01:43:54.440 --> 01:43:55.440]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:43:55.440 --> 01:44:19.440]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:25.440 --> 01:44:29.440]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:44:29.440 --> 01:44:31.440]  most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.440 --> 01:44:33.440]  We have come to trust Jungevity so much,
[01:44:33.440 --> 01:44:39.440]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.440 --> 01:44:42.440]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[01:44:42.440 --> 01:44:47.440]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.440 --> 01:44:51.440]  As you realize the benefits of Jungevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.440 --> 01:44:56.440]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:44:56.440 --> 01:44:58.440]  and increase your income.
[01:44:58.440 --> 01:45:03.440]  Order now.
[01:45:03.440 --> 01:45:06.440]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.440 --> 01:45:09.440]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:09.440 --> 01:45:14.440]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:14.440 --> 01:45:17.440]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:17.440 --> 01:45:21.440]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:21.440 --> 01:45:25.440]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.440 --> 01:45:30.440]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.440 --> 01:45:36.440]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:36.440 --> 01:45:41.440]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:41.440 --> 01:45:45.440]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.440 --> 01:45:51.440]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:51.440 --> 01:45:54.440]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:54.440 --> 01:46:03.440]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:03.440 --> 01:46:18.440]  This program is brought to you by the U.S. Department of Justice
[01:46:18.440 --> 01:46:48.400]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheelbarrow Radio, and we're talking to you
[01:46:48.400 --> 01:46:59.400]  to Shelly in Texas, unmute Shelly in Texas, okay, so the issue is they're denying this
[01:46:59.400 --> 01:47:04.480]  person in contact, how did they took you off the visitors list?
[01:47:04.480 --> 01:47:09.320]  Well, it's kind of a long story.
[01:47:09.320 --> 01:47:15.440]  I met her because I was a volunteer there years ago, and we just stayed in touch, you
[01:47:15.440 --> 01:47:21.560]  know, and I actually, you know, became her power of attorney and helped her with personal
[01:47:21.560 --> 01:47:26.000]  things in her family, and so she, this is just...
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:30.400]  Yeah, we're going to run out of time, we're real short here.
[01:47:30.400 --> 01:47:33.480]  Did you try to visit her or is this a local prison?
[01:47:33.480 --> 01:47:38.400]  Yeah, they won't let me visit her for sure, but because I used to be a volunteer there,
[01:47:38.400 --> 01:47:44.600]  but my main point is they have cut off all contact, the prison has, it wasn't the judge,
[01:47:44.600 --> 01:47:47.160]  the prison cut off all contact.
[01:47:47.160 --> 01:47:52.480]  Cut you off completely or are they cutting her off?
[01:47:52.480 --> 01:47:55.160]  Me and her, I can't send her...
[01:47:55.160 --> 01:48:01.920]  Send me the documents in an envelope, I'll put my return address out and send it.
[01:48:01.920 --> 01:48:07.880]  Okay, okay, so that she can sign it?
[01:48:07.880 --> 01:48:16.320]  Yeah, send me an email and I will send you my home address or just send it to P.O. Box
[01:48:16.320 --> 01:48:17.320]  1, Boyd, Texas.
[01:48:17.320 --> 01:48:20.320]  Is that on your website?
[01:48:20.320 --> 01:48:21.320]  No.
[01:48:21.320 --> 01:48:22.320]  Okay.
[01:48:22.320 --> 01:48:29.440]  Good, just P.O. Box 1, Boyd, 76023.
[01:48:29.440 --> 01:48:30.440]  Okay.
[01:48:30.440 --> 01:48:34.320]  There's a moral behind P.O. Box 1.
[01:48:34.320 --> 01:48:40.600]  Never make a date with your girlfriend if your wife can be listening on the extension
[01:48:40.600 --> 01:48:47.320]  and you live in a mobile home, but she might come home to a slab and three suitcases.
[01:48:47.320 --> 01:48:51.920]  Now Beachy didn't find that as funny as I did, but he gave me his P.O. Box when he left
[01:48:51.920 --> 01:48:52.920]  town.
[01:48:52.920 --> 01:48:58.440]  Okay, get that to me, I will send it in and we'll see how this shakes out.
[01:48:58.440 --> 01:48:59.440]  Okay.
[01:48:59.440 --> 01:49:00.440]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:49:00.440 --> 01:49:01.440]  Okay.
[01:49:01.440 --> 01:49:02.440]  Thank you.
[01:49:02.440 --> 01:49:09.760]  Okay, now we're going to go to somebody we've never talked to before.
[01:49:09.760 --> 01:49:13.680]  Some John guy in Texas, no, in New York.
[01:49:13.680 --> 01:49:22.320]  Hello, John in New York, straight shooter, concise, to the point, what do you got for
[01:49:22.320 --> 01:49:23.320]  us?
[01:49:23.320 --> 01:49:29.960]  Well, last night I heard you with a gentleman and he was asking questions on how to proceed
[01:49:29.960 --> 01:49:35.200]  with taking the bad guys down with regard to what he was doing.
[01:49:35.200 --> 01:49:40.120]  And that had to do with COVID and stuff like that.
[01:49:40.120 --> 01:49:48.760]  Well, one of the best sources of information that I have ever run across is Dr. David Martin,
[01:49:48.760 --> 01:49:56.200]  Dr. David, D-A-V-I-D Martin, M-A-R-T-I-N.
[01:49:56.200 --> 01:50:02.400]  Isn't that Dr. David Chrome Dome Martin?
[01:50:02.400 --> 01:50:03.400]  That's right.
[01:50:03.400 --> 01:50:04.400]  That's right.
[01:50:04.400 --> 01:50:11.200]  He does have a Chrome Dome and he's probably, and he even made a comment about it.
[01:50:11.200 --> 01:50:19.200]  He said that he was, I forget how he put it, but anyway, he explains all the different
[01:50:19.200 --> 01:50:20.200]  angles.
[01:50:20.200 --> 01:50:25.960]  You see, the pharmaceutical companies aren't really the ones that were responsible for
[01:50:25.960 --> 01:50:26.960]  all this.
[01:50:26.960 --> 01:50:29.720]  This is a government project.
[01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:35.480]  DARPA was involved and he even names the name of the company who-
[01:50:35.480 --> 01:50:36.480]  DARPA?
[01:50:36.480 --> 01:50:43.560]  DARPA, you know, yeah, the government was involved with this and the pharmaceutical
[01:50:43.560 --> 01:50:44.560]  companies are just covers.
[01:50:44.560 --> 01:50:48.760]  But DARPA is a robotics company.
[01:50:48.760 --> 01:50:52.680]  Well, they do a lot of-
[01:50:52.680 --> 01:50:55.680]  They do all kinds of things.
[01:50:55.680 --> 01:51:01.360]  So, you've got the government really behind this and they use the pharmaceutical companies
[01:51:01.360 --> 01:51:02.360]  as a cover.
[01:51:02.360 --> 01:51:06.480]  And of course, the pharmaceutical companies make billions, and I'm meaning billions of
[01:51:06.480 --> 01:51:08.560]  dollars off this project.
[01:51:08.560 --> 01:51:13.720]  Now, Dr. David Martin, I had given you his videos.
[01:51:13.720 --> 01:51:18.640]  He's got two unbelievable videos where he nails it down.
[01:51:18.640 --> 01:51:26.720]  And if you're an attorney trying to do a lawsuit, Dr. David Martin's information is just important
[01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:28.880]  as all get out.
[01:51:28.880 --> 01:51:34.600]  And you've got to pay attention to what David is saying and he says an awful lot in his
[01:51:34.600 --> 01:51:35.600]  videos.
[01:51:35.600 --> 01:51:40.240]  I'll send them to you again if you want to see them.
[01:51:40.240 --> 01:51:42.560]  And he spells it out.
[01:51:42.560 --> 01:51:51.480]  For example, you're familiar with the situation in Nuremberg.
[01:51:51.480 --> 01:51:57.040]  And now they've got the Nuremberg Code as a result where they cannot use experimental
[01:51:57.040 --> 01:52:04.240]  vaccines or experimental drugs on anybody against their will.
[01:52:04.240 --> 01:52:06.000]  And there has to be informed consent.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:14.480]  Well, when the pharmaceutical companies printed blank inserts not talking about the testing,
[01:52:14.480 --> 01:52:21.960]  the efficacy, the ingredients, and everything they're supposed to do by law, federal law.
[01:52:21.960 --> 01:52:32.720]  They broke federal law when they issued the vaccines with no inserts telling what was
[01:52:32.720 --> 01:52:37.800]  in them, how they got there, what the risks are, and so on and so forth.
[01:52:37.800 --> 01:52:40.080]  So that's not informed consent.
[01:52:40.080 --> 01:52:46.440]  Then to top it off, on top of it, there's so much to this we can't do it in even an
[01:52:46.440 --> 01:52:47.440]  hour.
[01:52:47.440 --> 01:52:49.920]  Well, we might be able to do it in an hour.
[01:52:49.920 --> 01:52:54.760]  But anyway, I'll just give you a brief overview and then I'll send you his videos.
[01:52:54.760 --> 01:52:59.120]  And then make sure you listen to every single word he says.
[01:52:59.120 --> 01:53:04.000]  If he wastes some time in one of his videos, the first seven minutes is just blah, blah,
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  blah.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  And I'll warn you about that.
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:10.800]  I'll tell you, you can listen to it, but just go through it quick.
[01:53:10.800 --> 01:53:15.120]  And then at the seven-minute mark, that's when he begins the meat and potatoes.
[01:53:15.120 --> 01:53:21.160]  So- Okay, John, have you looked at our telegram channel,
[01:53:21.160 --> 01:53:22.720]  the Masked Law Society?
[01:53:22.720 --> 01:53:27.120]  I'll say that again, the telegram channel.
[01:53:27.120 --> 01:53:29.320]  Masked Law Society.
[01:53:29.320 --> 01:53:31.520]  Masked Law Society.
[01:53:31.520 --> 01:53:36.080]  Yeah, we've got about 1,500 people on there.
[01:53:36.080 --> 01:53:40.240]  And this is their area of interest.
[01:53:40.240 --> 01:53:43.840]  Yeah.
[01:53:43.840 --> 01:53:44.840]  Send me an email.
[01:53:44.840 --> 01:53:46.920]  I'll send you a link to it.
[01:53:46.920 --> 01:53:47.920]  Okay.
[01:53:47.920 --> 01:53:50.280]  Do you have telegram?
[01:53:50.280 --> 01:53:54.480]  No, I don't know anything about it, really.
[01:53:54.480 --> 01:54:03.440]  Well, in order to get it to work, it's an app you can download to your cell phone.
[01:54:03.440 --> 01:54:09.480]  And once you have it on your cell phone, then you can load it on your computer.
[01:54:09.480 --> 01:54:13.720]  You can't load it on your computer without having it on your cell phone.
[01:54:13.720 --> 01:54:14.720]  I see.
[01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:15.720]  All right.
[01:54:15.720 --> 01:54:22.080]  And that'll make it relatively easy because when you download it to your computer, your
[01:54:22.080 --> 01:54:27.720]  computer will come up and give you one of these hashtag boxes, and you just point the
[01:54:27.720 --> 01:54:32.880]  phone at it, and it'll see it and recognize it, and it'll load right up.
[01:54:32.880 --> 01:54:34.160]  I see.
[01:54:34.160 --> 01:54:42.400]  So basically, Dr. Martin says, well, there's so much that he says, I'll just do one thing.
[01:54:42.400 --> 01:54:48.200]  The Nuremberg Code and the Geneva Convention have been violated with those vaccines.
[01:54:48.200 --> 01:54:49.200]  Why?
[01:54:49.200 --> 01:54:52.320]  Because number one, they're not vaccines at all.
[01:54:52.320 --> 01:54:56.840]  And that violates federal law, that's misrepresentation.
[01:54:56.840 --> 01:55:04.480]  And the FDA has gone in and hammered and gunned down people practically for misrepresentation
[01:55:04.480 --> 01:55:07.280]  with regard to drugs.
[01:55:07.280 --> 01:55:10.360]  They say it's one thing, and it's really something else.
[01:55:10.360 --> 01:55:11.760]  So that's what they're doing.
[01:55:11.760 --> 01:55:14.480]  They're saying it's one thing, and it's really something else.
[01:55:14.480 --> 01:55:21.200]  It's an mRNA mode of medical intervention.
[01:55:21.200 --> 01:55:28.760]  So that's one reason why they hide behind all these 1986 rules and regulations that
[01:55:28.760 --> 01:55:32.080]  I guess Mr. Slick Willie enacted.
[01:55:32.080 --> 01:55:39.240]  You see, there's so much fraud and misrepresentation involved.
[01:55:39.240 --> 01:55:45.040]  They can't hide behind that law because they violated everything up the yin-yang.
[01:55:45.040 --> 01:55:48.560]  And so the inserts were blank.
[01:55:48.560 --> 01:55:50.760]  So that's not informed consent.
[01:55:50.760 --> 01:55:56.840]  And you've got to remember, the most important thing of all, the FDA never approved the COVID
[01:55:56.840 --> 01:55:57.840]  vaccine.
[01:55:57.840 --> 01:56:01.840]  Oh, yeah, they approved it, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah.
[01:56:01.840 --> 01:56:02.960]  No, they didn't.
[01:56:02.960 --> 01:56:07.960]  It was called emergency use authorization only.
[01:56:07.960 --> 01:56:15.600]  I remember the gentleman last night mentioned that 40% deaths have gone up, 40%.
[01:56:15.600 --> 01:56:16.600]  He's right.
[01:56:16.600 --> 01:56:17.600]  That was a correct figure.
[01:56:17.600 --> 01:56:21.000]  He knows the figure, and he had it right.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:27.400]  40%, the deaths have gone up ever since they started rolling out the vaccine.
[01:56:27.400 --> 01:56:29.400]  That's not just a coincidence.
[01:56:29.400 --> 01:56:37.600]  And the blood clots, oh, Al Roker, by the way, Al Roker, he got boosted, he got shot
[01:56:37.600 --> 01:56:44.200]  up with the regular vaccine, then he got the booster, and Al Roker has COVID.
[01:56:44.200 --> 01:56:49.200]  And then I can't remember who it was that got it the second time, oh, Whoopi Goldberg.
[01:56:49.200 --> 01:56:52.200]  Yeah, and our illustrious president.
[01:56:52.200 --> 01:56:55.040]  Yeah, oh, yeah.
[01:56:55.040 --> 01:57:01.680]  So to make a long story short, there are so many ways that you can attack this as an attorney.
[01:57:01.680 --> 01:57:02.680]  It isn't funny.
[01:57:02.680 --> 01:57:11.720]  They have left themselves wide open because of all the fraud, misrepresentation, and coercion.
[01:57:11.720 --> 01:57:15.480]  Supposing you're sick, supposing you've got pneumonia, and the doctor says, I need to
[01:57:15.480 --> 01:57:23.200]  give you penicillin, penicillin and bed rest and vitamin D, and you say, I don't want it.
[01:57:23.200 --> 01:57:28.080]  Well, he can't force you, even when you're sick and dying, he cannot force you.
[01:57:28.080 --> 01:57:33.640]  So how much less can they force you when you're not sick, you don't have COVID, you don't
[01:57:33.640 --> 01:57:38.680]  have any illnesses, and they want to force an experimental vaccine on you?
[01:57:38.680 --> 01:57:41.320]  How much more right do you have to say no?
[01:57:41.320 --> 01:57:48.280]  And how much more right do they, how much less of a right do they want to force it on?
[01:57:48.280 --> 01:57:53.720]  So that's basically it, and I'll send you, but you got to listen, you really have to
[01:57:53.720 --> 01:57:58.400]  listen carefully because he's got a lot of information in there when he wants to get
[01:57:58.400 --> 01:57:59.400]  started.
[01:57:59.400 --> 01:58:00.680]  Send them to me.
[01:58:00.680 --> 01:58:06.480]  I think I've listened to both of them, but I'll make them available on the telegram
[01:58:06.480 --> 01:58:10.320]  side if they're not already up there.
[01:58:10.320 --> 01:58:15.800]  You will find a wealth of information and a lot of people there who are interested in
[01:58:15.800 --> 01:58:17.800]  litigating this subject.
[01:58:17.800 --> 01:58:20.280]  Oh yeah, absolutely.
[01:58:20.280 --> 01:58:24.440]  So that's basically it, Martin, is the key.
[01:58:24.440 --> 01:58:28.280]  Wait a minute, John, you still got 20 seconds, you've wasted.
[01:58:28.280 --> 01:58:30.480]  Okay, here we go.
[01:58:30.480 --> 01:58:31.480]  Here we go.
[01:58:31.480 --> 01:58:33.720]  Never mind, you're done.
[01:58:33.720 --> 01:58:34.720]  Thank you, John.
[01:58:34.720 --> 01:58:41.160]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, we're running out of time.
[01:58:41.160 --> 01:58:47.440]  Make sure you listen to Eddie's show at eight o'clock central, Monday nights, and us next
[01:58:47.440 --> 01:58:48.440]  week.
[01:58:48.440 --> 01:58:49.440]  Thank you for listening.
[01:58:49.440 --> 01:58:56.720]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.720 --> 01:58:57.920]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.920 --> 01:59:02.900]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.900 --> 01:59:08.560]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.560 --> 01:59:11.840]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.840 --> 01:59:20.800]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.800 --> 01:59:26.480]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.480 --> 01:59:30.360]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:32.900]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.900 --> 01:59:41.280]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.280 --> 01:59:51.520]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.520 --> 01:59:52.520]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.520 --> 02:00:12.640]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.